WEBVTT - Chuck’s Commentary - Is Trump Prepping The U.S. For War With Venezuela? + This Week In History + Ask Chuck

0:00:04.800 --> 0:00:07.600
<v Speaker 1>Hello there, Happy Monday, and welcome to another episode of

0:00:07.640 --> 0:00:13.119
<v Speaker 1>the Chuck Toodcast. Today. I hope you've enjoyed your first

0:00:13.440 --> 0:00:17.239
<v Speaker 1>full double dose of football Week two, of college football

0:00:17.280 --> 0:00:19.959
<v Speaker 1>Week one of the NFL football football football. I'm not

0:00:20.040 --> 0:00:23.960
<v Speaker 1>footballed out. I really never get footballed out unless I'm

0:00:24.000 --> 0:00:28.400
<v Speaker 1>watching some version of the UFL. And even then I

0:00:28.440 --> 0:00:30.720
<v Speaker 1>find myself watching one quarter of that in March when

0:00:30.760 --> 0:00:35.000
<v Speaker 1>I'm missing college and pro football. You know, it's interesting.

0:00:35.000 --> 0:00:38.559
<v Speaker 1>I also my guest over the weekend for my new

0:00:38.600 --> 0:00:43.559
<v Speaker 1>sphere show is Chris Murphy, Democratic senator from Connecticut, somebody

0:00:43.560 --> 0:00:49.440
<v Speaker 1>who wants to go harder at Donald Trump pre twenty

0:00:49.479 --> 0:00:53.159
<v Speaker 1>twenty five was I think if some people were watching him,

0:00:53.159 --> 0:00:55.000
<v Speaker 1>they say he wants to move to the left. He

0:00:55.000 --> 0:00:57.400
<v Speaker 1>wants to be a bit more to the left of

0:00:57.480 --> 0:00:59.959
<v Speaker 1>left of center wherever the party is. If the main

0:01:00.160 --> 0:01:03.480
<v Speaker 1>if you know, if you just put a number on it, right,

0:01:04.360 --> 0:01:06.759
<v Speaker 1>one hundred is sort of Joe Mansion on the scale

0:01:06.760 --> 0:01:10.880
<v Speaker 1>of Democrats. Zero is Bernie Sanders. Chris Murphy wanted to

0:01:10.920 --> 0:01:13.920
<v Speaker 1>be somewhere close to the fifty yard line, but closer

0:01:13.959 --> 0:01:16.320
<v Speaker 1>to Bernie rather than closer to Mansion. And I say

0:01:16.319 --> 0:01:18.800
<v Speaker 1>this and that the Chris Murphy I encountered as a

0:01:18.800 --> 0:01:22.560
<v Speaker 1>guy who clearly is interested in trying to improve the

0:01:22.600 --> 0:01:25.400
<v Speaker 1>Democratic brand, would like to be a leader of the party,

0:01:25.959 --> 0:01:28.000
<v Speaker 1>is looking to see if there's an appetite for him

0:01:28.000 --> 0:01:30.160
<v Speaker 1>to run for president. He did not sort of shy

0:01:30.200 --> 0:01:32.800
<v Speaker 1>away from any of those questions. But what was interesting

0:01:32.920 --> 0:01:37.240
<v Speaker 1>was how he really said, Look, the Democratic Party's got

0:01:37.280 --> 0:01:40.240
<v Speaker 1>to figure out how to win voters that are much

0:01:40.280 --> 0:01:43.520
<v Speaker 1>more conservative on cultural issues, that there is more of

0:01:43.560 --> 0:01:46.280
<v Speaker 1>a common bond on economic issues, and something you'll hear

0:01:46.280 --> 0:01:49.040
<v Speaker 1>from Abdul say ed that's else I ed, that's an

0:01:49.160 --> 0:01:51.320
<v Speaker 1>argument he's making. It's an argument he made in his

0:01:51.320 --> 0:01:54.640
<v Speaker 1>first candidate campaign for office in twenty eighteen. Same argument

0:01:54.640 --> 0:01:58.720
<v Speaker 1>he's making there, that the economic pain is shared sort

0:01:58.720 --> 0:02:02.720
<v Speaker 1>of on the ideological spec and that one way to

0:02:03.160 --> 0:02:06.520
<v Speaker 1>sort of put Democrats and independent voters and maybe even

0:02:06.600 --> 0:02:13.840
<v Speaker 1>some skeptical working class Republicans is to focus on economic

0:02:13.919 --> 0:02:17.880
<v Speaker 1>issues and also security issues. Don't shy away from the

0:02:17.880 --> 0:02:19.640
<v Speaker 1>security issues. What do I mean by the security issues,

0:02:19.680 --> 0:02:22.720
<v Speaker 1>Whether it's the border and get a little tougher on immigration,

0:02:23.840 --> 0:02:27.919
<v Speaker 1>or it's law and order in the cities, And it's

0:02:28.000 --> 0:02:31.800
<v Speaker 1>all about whether how are you careful not to take

0:02:31.880 --> 0:02:34.440
<v Speaker 1>the bait that the White House clearly is setting up

0:02:34.440 --> 0:02:37.160
<v Speaker 1>here at the White House absolutely does not want to

0:02:37.160 --> 0:02:39.040
<v Speaker 1>have a discussion about the economy right now, doesn't want

0:02:39.040 --> 0:02:42.920
<v Speaker 1>to have a discussion about tariffs in particular, doesn't want

0:02:42.919 --> 0:02:44.560
<v Speaker 1>to have a discussion about Epstein, doesn't want to have

0:02:44.560 --> 0:02:48.440
<v Speaker 1>a discussion about Ukraine and Russia. What they do, what

0:02:48.480 --> 0:02:51.480
<v Speaker 1>they would love to do, is continue to sort of

0:02:52.040 --> 0:02:57.520
<v Speaker 1>bait Democrats into pushing back at the White House on

0:02:57.600 --> 0:03:01.960
<v Speaker 1>the issue of how aggressive should these should these tactics

0:03:02.000 --> 0:03:05.840
<v Speaker 1>when it comes to the cities, how aggressive is too aggressive?

0:03:06.280 --> 0:03:09.720
<v Speaker 1>What is And there's no doubt that the ridiculous social

0:03:09.760 --> 0:03:13.400
<v Speaker 1>media memes that the President has already retweeted, sort of

0:03:13.480 --> 0:03:18.200
<v Speaker 1>him doing an Apocalypse Now parody when it comes to Chicago,

0:03:19.880 --> 0:03:23.080
<v Speaker 1>it got the intended response, right, which was it got

0:03:24.400 --> 0:03:28.119
<v Speaker 1>the entire sort of Illinois pushback, whether it was JB.

0:03:28.200 --> 0:03:31.040
<v Speaker 1>Pritz Or as governor or others that it was the

0:03:31.080 --> 0:03:33.880
<v Speaker 1>intended pushback that they wanted, which was this was over

0:03:33.919 --> 0:03:37.800
<v Speaker 1>the top. And there's no doubt the public does not

0:03:38.200 --> 0:03:41.320
<v Speaker 1>like the tactics. We continue to see polling that says

0:03:41.320 --> 0:03:43.400
<v Speaker 1>they don't want to see the National Guard go in.

0:03:43.440 --> 0:03:45.680
<v Speaker 1>But when you look at the two parties and you

0:03:45.720 --> 0:03:48.400
<v Speaker 1>say which party seems to be more concerned about law

0:03:48.440 --> 0:03:51.080
<v Speaker 1>and order, the Republicans are winning this argument, and they're

0:03:51.120 --> 0:03:54.240
<v Speaker 1>winning it big time. And that's why it is interesting

0:03:54.320 --> 0:03:58.520
<v Speaker 1>to watch how the different mayors handle this. Right I'm

0:03:58.560 --> 0:04:00.840
<v Speaker 1>intrigued by what they're doing in Mayor Maryland, where I

0:04:01.080 --> 0:04:03.760
<v Speaker 1>or the governor said, hey, we don't want any federal reinforcements,

0:04:03.760 --> 0:04:05.720
<v Speaker 1>but we're going to help Baltimore and we're going to

0:04:05.800 --> 0:04:09.520
<v Speaker 1>help with some state reinforcements. You've got a Mariel Bowser

0:04:09.840 --> 0:04:12.320
<v Speaker 1>who was saying, Hey, I welcome the federal intervention. I

0:04:12.320 --> 0:04:15.680
<v Speaker 1>don't like the masked ICE agents because that's pretty undemocratic

0:04:15.680 --> 0:04:18.840
<v Speaker 1>and un American. But for the most part, I appreciate

0:04:19.040 --> 0:04:24.400
<v Speaker 1>the extra resources in order to allow the police to

0:04:24.440 --> 0:04:27.320
<v Speaker 1>focus where they need to focus, versus other cities that

0:04:27.360 --> 0:04:30.400
<v Speaker 1>are thinking about a wholesale pushback on this. And I

0:04:30.400 --> 0:04:34.400
<v Speaker 1>think you know, there is nothing the administration wants more

0:04:34.440 --> 0:04:37.920
<v Speaker 1>than a showdown in Chicago. Now, does that mean rolling

0:04:37.960 --> 0:04:41.520
<v Speaker 1>over on civil libertarian issues. I don't think anybody is

0:04:41.560 --> 0:04:44.800
<v Speaker 1>suggesting rolling over on these issues. The question is can

0:04:44.880 --> 0:04:47.200
<v Speaker 1>you take the issue away from it's like, look, we're

0:04:47.200 --> 0:04:49.760
<v Speaker 1>focused on this too. We're trying to do it within

0:04:49.800 --> 0:04:55.440
<v Speaker 1>the constitution, rather than only fighting the constitutional grounds and saying, hey,

0:04:55.480 --> 0:04:59.719
<v Speaker 1>everything is fine and saying, look at how great these

0:04:59.760 --> 0:05:05.280
<v Speaker 1>trends are. There's got to be sort of somewhere in

0:05:05.360 --> 0:05:10.560
<v Speaker 1>between here because when you look at it, that perception

0:05:10.680 --> 0:05:14.480
<v Speaker 1>and reality are blurred here, and it's going to be

0:05:14.600 --> 0:05:18.040
<v Speaker 1>really hard to win that larger argument. And it is Look,

0:05:18.800 --> 0:05:21.000
<v Speaker 1>at some point, it may be they use a tactic

0:05:21.040 --> 0:05:24.240
<v Speaker 1>that goes too far and it will implode on them

0:05:24.279 --> 0:05:27.640
<v Speaker 1>both politically and then some and I do think that

0:05:27.640 --> 0:05:30.839
<v Speaker 1>that in the long term they're a I mean, just

0:05:30.920 --> 0:05:37.240
<v Speaker 1>look at their trial balloon on trying to attack transgender

0:05:37.279 --> 0:05:39.640
<v Speaker 1>Americans and take away their rights when it comes to

0:05:40.080 --> 0:05:45.159
<v Speaker 1>two guns created a fascinating coalition that said you can't

0:05:45.160 --> 0:05:48.480
<v Speaker 1>do that, that that's unconstitutional, that that essentially the gun

0:05:48.560 --> 0:05:50.960
<v Speaker 1>rights groups going that that's a slippery slope. But it's

0:05:50.960 --> 0:05:55.920
<v Speaker 1>also an acknowledgment that this idea of trying to label,

0:05:56.360 --> 0:05:59.720
<v Speaker 1>I mean, I think the two most dangerous things rhetorically

0:05:59.760 --> 0:06:02.000
<v Speaker 1>that we've heard from some on the right are the

0:06:02.080 --> 0:06:06.839
<v Speaker 1>attempt to label transgender Americans and lump them in with

0:06:06.920 --> 0:06:10.400
<v Speaker 1>mental illness. That's what clearly the Justice Department was trying

0:06:10.440 --> 0:06:12.679
<v Speaker 1>to do in order to get at that issue of guns.

0:06:13.120 --> 0:06:16.760
<v Speaker 1>That's going to be a losing argument. I like to

0:06:16.760 --> 0:06:22.479
<v Speaker 1>think that there's given that there is zero accepted science

0:06:22.520 --> 0:06:25.279
<v Speaker 1>on this. And then the second is who you designate

0:06:25.320 --> 0:06:28.560
<v Speaker 1>a terrorist organization? And who do you designate as terrorists?

0:06:28.560 --> 0:06:32.160
<v Speaker 1>And you hear Stephen Miller's rhetoric increasingly tries to call

0:06:32.240 --> 0:06:35.719
<v Speaker 1>sort of people that disagree with them on the left,

0:06:36.360 --> 0:06:40.680
<v Speaker 1>equate them, uses the T word and terrorists and it

0:06:40.720 --> 0:06:42.880
<v Speaker 1>doesn't take much. I mean, if you look at the

0:06:43.000 --> 0:06:46.200
<v Speaker 1>rationale that's being used by the administration and targeting that

0:06:46.279 --> 0:06:50.400
<v Speaker 1>ship outside Venezuela, it all began with the State Department

0:06:50.640 --> 0:06:56.280
<v Speaker 1>designation of the cartel designating at a terrorist. That isn't

0:06:56.680 --> 0:06:59.200
<v Speaker 1>It's not an Act of Congress that makes that decision.

0:06:59.200 --> 0:07:04.240
<v Speaker 1>It's essentially an an interpretation of the current administration. How

0:07:04.279 --> 0:07:06.120
<v Speaker 1>far are they going to go with that? Right? How

0:07:06.200 --> 0:07:07.760
<v Speaker 1>much are they going to go with that? And this

0:07:07.880 --> 0:07:09.600
<v Speaker 1>is going to get and I want to get at

0:07:09.640 --> 0:07:13.000
<v Speaker 1>this debate here in a minute, but this gets at

0:07:13.040 --> 0:07:17.040
<v Speaker 1>the when it comes to these law and order issues,

0:07:17.080 --> 0:07:21.960
<v Speaker 1>and when it comes to these immigration sort of aggressive tactics,

0:07:23.040 --> 0:07:25.080
<v Speaker 1>the White House is not going to back down, especially

0:07:25.120 --> 0:07:28.880
<v Speaker 1>since it is the only thing they're doing, the only

0:07:28.920 --> 0:07:32.360
<v Speaker 1>thing they're doing where there is positive poll response from

0:07:32.360 --> 0:07:36.200
<v Speaker 1>the public. The base loves it and is more devoted

0:07:36.200 --> 0:07:40.320
<v Speaker 1>than ever, and the goals themselves are seen as goals

0:07:40.320 --> 0:07:42.920
<v Speaker 1>that the public wants and those want to see. Again,

0:07:43.080 --> 0:07:48.440
<v Speaker 1>it's the tactics that are disagreed with, but when political

0:07:48.440 --> 0:07:52.920
<v Speaker 1>opponents read that disagreement, they sometimes interpret it that it's

0:07:52.920 --> 0:07:56.120
<v Speaker 1>the policy as well. Is also unpopular when it appears

0:07:56.120 --> 0:07:58.720
<v Speaker 1>to be just the tactics. And this is why I'm

0:07:58.760 --> 0:08:01.760
<v Speaker 1>intrigued by how Governor more has been handling this versus

0:08:01.760 --> 0:08:05.080
<v Speaker 1>some of these versus Governor Pritzker, and I think it's

0:08:05.920 --> 0:08:09.600
<v Speaker 1>it absolutely is worth a twenty twenty eight comparison. There.

0:08:12.240 --> 0:08:15.880
<v Speaker 1>There's no doubt the base wants some fight, right And

0:08:15.920 --> 0:08:17.680
<v Speaker 1>this is something I talked with Chris Murphy. This is

0:08:17.680 --> 0:08:21.880
<v Speaker 1>why a government shut down is almost a given right

0:08:21.920 --> 0:08:26.040
<v Speaker 1>now it given everything that's going on in Washington. So

0:08:27.240 --> 0:08:30.320
<v Speaker 1>and Pritzker certainly sees what Gavin Newsom is doing. There's

0:08:30.320 --> 0:08:33.120
<v Speaker 1>no doubt if you show some fight the base is

0:08:33.120 --> 0:08:35.640
<v Speaker 1>going to reward you to a point. The question is

0:08:35.640 --> 0:08:38.200
<v Speaker 1>how do you tactically do it without also keeping yourself

0:08:38.200 --> 0:08:43.840
<v Speaker 1>electable In twenty twenty eight with swing voters and Pritzker

0:08:43.880 --> 0:08:46.480
<v Speaker 1>is coming across a bit in denial about the problem

0:08:46.559 --> 0:08:49.280
<v Speaker 1>in Chicago versus A Wes Moore saying, look, we know

0:08:49.360 --> 0:08:51.240
<v Speaker 1>there's more work to do. We just don't think you

0:08:51.280 --> 0:08:55.319
<v Speaker 1>should use unconstitutional means to do it. That is politically

0:08:56.440 --> 0:09:03.959
<v Speaker 1>a much smarter place to be. But I understand you

0:09:04.320 --> 0:09:06.080
<v Speaker 1>sort of need to do both. You need to fight

0:09:06.160 --> 0:09:08.760
<v Speaker 1>on the civil libertarian grounds, make sure all the stuff

0:09:08.800 --> 0:09:11.120
<v Speaker 1>gets forced through the courts. I think I'm one of

0:09:11.120 --> 0:09:14.840
<v Speaker 1>those people that you know, that's what these interest groups

0:09:15.240 --> 0:09:17.920
<v Speaker 1>are good at doing, and sort of forcing judicial review

0:09:17.960 --> 0:09:22.080
<v Speaker 1>over controversial policies, and forcing judicial review is something that

0:09:22.120 --> 0:09:25.000
<v Speaker 1>I think if you have a weak legislative branch, which

0:09:25.000 --> 0:09:27.920
<v Speaker 1>we do right now, the only really recourse that you

0:09:28.000 --> 0:09:31.840
<v Speaker 1>have besides protests in the ballot box is judicial in

0:09:31.880 --> 0:09:35.520
<v Speaker 1>some sort of judicial review. So you can do that

0:09:35.679 --> 0:09:41.280
<v Speaker 1>and at the same time accentuate policies that respond to

0:09:41.320 --> 0:09:45.240
<v Speaker 1>what the electorate is seeing. But it sort of takes

0:09:45.280 --> 0:09:49.760
<v Speaker 1>me to I guess the which is an eternal challenge

0:09:49.760 --> 0:09:53.360
<v Speaker 1>with the Trump administration is that, you know, if you

0:09:53.400 --> 0:09:58.000
<v Speaker 1>look at everything that's that sort of front and center

0:09:58.120 --> 0:10:03.840
<v Speaker 1>right now with the administration, any one of those stories

0:10:03.880 --> 0:10:06.800
<v Speaker 1>could be the dominating story for an entire week, and

0:10:06.840 --> 0:10:10.120
<v Speaker 1>it would make everything else sort of disappear. We've seen this, right,

0:10:10.160 --> 0:10:14.400
<v Speaker 1>the Epstein Files being the best example of a story

0:10:14.400 --> 0:10:19.600
<v Speaker 1>that can just totally consume everything. Well, we're in the

0:10:19.640 --> 0:10:23.320
<v Speaker 1>middle of apparently launching a war against Venezuela, right, We've

0:10:23.360 --> 0:10:27.280
<v Speaker 1>stationed F thirty five's in the Caribbean. We've already blown

0:10:27.360 --> 0:10:29.120
<v Speaker 1>up a ship, and I'm going to get to that.

0:10:29.240 --> 0:10:33.840
<v Speaker 1>Because that debate, I think it opened up and gave

0:10:33.920 --> 0:10:36.839
<v Speaker 1>us a preview of what could be a fascinating debate

0:10:36.880 --> 0:10:40.520
<v Speaker 1>on the right in twenty twenty eight between the Rand

0:10:40.600 --> 0:10:42.960
<v Speaker 1>Paul wing of what's left of the libertarian wing of

0:10:42.960 --> 0:10:48.280
<v Speaker 1>the Republican Party and the JD Vance and the rhetorica.

0:10:48.400 --> 0:10:51.040
<v Speaker 1>He used that basically, the ends, what I'm calling an

0:10:51.120 --> 0:10:55.760
<v Speaker 1>ends justifies the means ideology, which borders on authoritarianism. If

0:10:55.800 --> 0:10:58.000
<v Speaker 1>the goal is to destroy these cartels, then so what

0:10:58.040 --> 0:11:01.000
<v Speaker 1>if you bomb them? So what if we don't due process?

0:11:01.080 --> 0:11:02.679
<v Speaker 1>So what if we don't make the case to the

0:11:02.720 --> 0:11:07.960
<v Speaker 1>world what we're doing. You know, once we start ignoring

0:11:11.520 --> 0:11:15.640
<v Speaker 1>international norms that the United States helped set, that the

0:11:15.760 --> 0:11:18.959
<v Speaker 1>United States over decades has helped champion, when we want

0:11:18.960 --> 0:11:20.800
<v Speaker 1>to set those aside, we're just going to blow up

0:11:20.840 --> 0:11:24.480
<v Speaker 1>a ship. I mean, why we didn't board the ship.

0:11:25.160 --> 0:11:27.000
<v Speaker 1>There's a whole bunch of things to go with the

0:11:27.080 --> 0:11:31.360
<v Speaker 1>story with Venezuela. One. If you're going to designate them

0:11:31.360 --> 0:11:33.680
<v Speaker 1>a terrorist organization, get out there and make the case.

0:11:33.679 --> 0:11:35.800
<v Speaker 1>The administration has not made a public case about this

0:11:38.240 --> 0:11:42.200
<v Speaker 1>sort of When you think about all the criticism of

0:11:42.200 --> 0:11:45.320
<v Speaker 1>the Bush administration, of the second Bush administration during the

0:11:45.320 --> 0:11:48.920
<v Speaker 1>first decade of the century over the Iraq War, you

0:11:48.960 --> 0:11:50.800
<v Speaker 1>know what they did do. They went in front of

0:11:50.800 --> 0:11:52.920
<v Speaker 1>the United Nations to make the case. They went in

0:11:52.960 --> 0:11:56.360
<v Speaker 1>front of the American people to make a case. Multiple times.

0:11:57.679 --> 0:11:59.760
<v Speaker 1>They put out the evidence that they claim that they have.

0:11:59.840 --> 0:12:02.839
<v Speaker 1>Now now it turned out to be wrong. It turned

0:12:02.880 --> 0:12:07.000
<v Speaker 1>out to be bad intelligence. And we've had a debate

0:12:07.040 --> 0:12:10.719
<v Speaker 1>about whether it was intentional miss you know, whether the

0:12:11.920 --> 0:12:16.800
<v Speaker 1>public and the and Congress was intentionally misled, or if

0:12:16.840 --> 0:12:22.760
<v Speaker 1>it was just simply bad interpretation of intelligence. Regardless, he

0:12:22.920 --> 0:12:26.200
<v Speaker 1>just didn't go into a rock before getting a vote

0:12:26.240 --> 0:12:30.120
<v Speaker 1>in Congress. This is you know, you know, it's interesting

0:12:30.280 --> 0:12:33.600
<v Speaker 1>and I can't help but looking at his what's going

0:12:33.600 --> 0:12:36.000
<v Speaker 1>on here with Venezuela here in the moment and sort

0:12:36.000 --> 0:12:38.240
<v Speaker 1>of see it as sort of, you know, Trump just

0:12:38.400 --> 0:12:41.080
<v Speaker 1>glorifies the eighties, right, he glorifies sort of two decades,

0:12:41.120 --> 0:12:43.200
<v Speaker 1>the fifties, in the eighties, right, he kind of wishes

0:12:43.520 --> 0:12:46.160
<v Speaker 1>all energy. He's trying to turn the Kennedy Center into

0:12:46.200 --> 0:12:50.439
<v Speaker 1>some sort of combination of the two. Right, that that

0:12:50.880 --> 0:12:56.319
<v Speaker 1>sort of glorifies those decades. But in the eighties there

0:12:56.320 --> 0:13:01.920
<v Speaker 1>were sort of two. There were two sort of moments

0:13:01.960 --> 0:13:04.679
<v Speaker 1>where the United States played bully a little bit with

0:13:04.800 --> 0:13:10.080
<v Speaker 1>a small country. Right. We had Granada, where where Reagan

0:13:10.120 --> 0:13:14.000
<v Speaker 1>went there in a sort of overnight deal. It was

0:13:14.040 --> 0:13:19.520
<v Speaker 1>seemed to be a bit over the top, some loose

0:13:19.600 --> 0:13:23.360
<v Speaker 1>connection to communists in Cuba, but it was a pretty

0:13:23.360 --> 0:13:27.880
<v Speaker 1>aggressive action for but it was almost it was quote

0:13:27.960 --> 0:13:30.400
<v Speaker 1>unquote sending a message and it was in and it

0:13:30.440 --> 0:13:34.880
<v Speaker 1>was out, and it was a quick success, so fast

0:13:34.920 --> 0:13:39.840
<v Speaker 1>before Congress could really belch clear their throat. And then

0:13:39.840 --> 0:13:43.240
<v Speaker 1>there was George H. W. Bush and the and the

0:13:43.400 --> 0:13:47.240
<v Speaker 1>essentially the seizing of Noriega. And I guess you could

0:13:48.000 --> 0:13:50.920
<v Speaker 1>kind of put this what is going on here in

0:13:51.000 --> 0:13:54.880
<v Speaker 1>Venezuela with what was done with Panama, where Noriega was

0:13:56.080 --> 0:13:58.880
<v Speaker 1>appeared to be a part of the drug trade. We

0:13:58.880 --> 0:14:02.120
<v Speaker 1>were trying to crack down down on various ways that

0:14:02.200 --> 0:14:05.520
<v Speaker 1>drugs were getting into the United States, and here was,

0:14:05.800 --> 0:14:09.960
<v Speaker 1>you know, a puppet in Panama who was once sort

0:14:09.960 --> 0:14:12.120
<v Speaker 1>of a puppet for the United States or for the West.

0:14:12.240 --> 0:14:14.280
<v Speaker 1>And I'm being a little over the top with the

0:14:14.360 --> 0:14:16.040
<v Speaker 1>use of the word puppet here, but the point was

0:14:16.240 --> 0:14:19.520
<v Speaker 1>there was a time he was our ally and then

0:14:19.960 --> 0:14:23.080
<v Speaker 1>he got himself engrossed in the drug trade. And so

0:14:23.200 --> 0:14:30.240
<v Speaker 1>we sort of did a military ish operation, right to

0:14:30.280 --> 0:14:34.560
<v Speaker 1>go get noriek and hold them and hold him to

0:14:34.600 --> 0:14:38.560
<v Speaker 1>account for his role in the drug trade. So Trump

0:14:38.640 --> 0:14:41.760
<v Speaker 1>sent followed the war powers. You know, he's got to

0:14:41.880 --> 0:14:46.440
<v Speaker 1>send within a quick period of time. He's got to

0:14:46.600 --> 0:14:50.200
<v Speaker 1>send within twenty four hours his justification for the attack.

0:14:50.280 --> 0:14:53.760
<v Speaker 1>And here's and he writes the Senate President pro ten

0:14:53.800 --> 0:14:56.120
<v Speaker 1>which in this case is Juck Grassley in the Speaker

0:14:56.120 --> 0:14:58.840
<v Speaker 1>of the House, which is Mike Johnson, And here's the

0:14:58.920 --> 0:15:01.080
<v Speaker 1>letter because the letter's not got enough attention, because I

0:15:01.160 --> 0:15:03.880
<v Speaker 1>right to apprise you military action taken on September second,

0:15:03.880 --> 0:15:06.440
<v Speaker 1>twenty twenty five in the Caribbean Sea, and of the

0:15:06.440 --> 0:15:09.800
<v Speaker 1>potential for further such actions. And then he writes this

0:15:09.920 --> 0:15:13.080
<v Speaker 1>extraordinarily violent drug trafficking cartels that the United States is

0:15:13.120 --> 0:15:17.200
<v Speaker 1>designated as terrorist organizations. Again, the United States has designated

0:15:17.200 --> 0:15:20.960
<v Speaker 1>as terroist organizations have wrought devastating consequences on American communities

0:15:20.960 --> 0:15:23.520
<v Speaker 1>for decades, causing the deaths of tens of thousands of

0:15:23.600 --> 0:15:26.040
<v Speaker 1>United States citizens each year and threatening our national security

0:15:26.040 --> 0:15:28.440
<v Speaker 1>and our foreign policy interests both at home and abroad.

0:15:28.680 --> 0:15:31.960
<v Speaker 1>These organizations have evolved into complex structures with the financial

0:15:32.000 --> 0:15:36.120
<v Speaker 1>means and paramilitary capabilities needed to operate with impunity, engaging

0:15:36.120 --> 0:15:38.920
<v Speaker 1>in violence and terrorism that threaten the United States and

0:15:39.000 --> 0:15:42.640
<v Speaker 1>destabilize other nations in our own hemisphere. Friendly foreign nations

0:15:42.640 --> 0:15:46.920
<v Speaker 1>have made significant efforts to combat these organizations, suffering significant

0:15:46.920 --> 0:15:49.440
<v Speaker 1>losses of life due to organized violence at the hands

0:15:49.480 --> 0:15:53.440
<v Speaker 1>of the groups designated as terrorist organizations. But these groups

0:15:53.480 --> 0:15:57.280
<v Speaker 1>are now transnational and operate throughout the Western hemisphere. In

0:15:57.360 --> 0:16:00.000
<v Speaker 1>the face of the inability or unwillingness of some state

0:16:00.240 --> 0:16:02.920
<v Speaker 1>in the region to address the continuing threat to the

0:16:03.040 --> 0:16:07.440
<v Speaker 1>United States and its persons and interests emanating from their territories.

0:16:07.800 --> 0:16:10.080
<v Speaker 1>We have now reached a critical point where we must

0:16:10.120 --> 0:16:13.360
<v Speaker 1>meet this threat to our citizens and our most vital

0:16:13.480 --> 0:16:20.000
<v Speaker 1>national interests with the United States military force in self defense. Accordingly,

0:16:20.040 --> 0:16:22.400
<v Speaker 1>at my direction, on September two, twenty twenty five, the

0:16:22.480 --> 0:16:25.360
<v Speaker 1>United States Forces struck a vessel at a location beyond

0:16:25.440 --> 0:16:28.520
<v Speaker 1>the territorial seas of any nation that was assessed to

0:16:28.560 --> 0:16:31.720
<v Speaker 1>be affiliated with a designated terrorist organization and to be

0:16:31.760 --> 0:16:35.000
<v Speaker 1>engaged in illicit drug trafficking activities. It is not possible

0:16:35.280 --> 0:16:37.840
<v Speaker 1>at this time to know the full scope and duration

0:16:37.920 --> 0:16:41.320
<v Speaker 1>of military operations that will be necessary. United States Forces

0:16:41.400 --> 0:16:45.400
<v Speaker 1>remained postured to carry out further military operations. I am

0:16:45.400 --> 0:16:47.800
<v Speaker 1>providing this report as part of my efforts to keep

0:16:47.800 --> 0:16:50.960
<v Speaker 1>the Congress fully informed. Well, I'm not sure there was

0:16:51.040 --> 0:16:53.760
<v Speaker 1>much fully informed there. If you look any any signs

0:16:53.760 --> 0:17:00.320
<v Speaker 1>at Donald J. Trump again, So you take this this gang,

0:17:00.320 --> 0:17:03.680
<v Speaker 1>they've they've taken this Venezuelan national gang of a lot

0:17:03.720 --> 0:17:06.800
<v Speaker 1>of Venezuelan national gang and they've designated a terrorist organization.

0:17:09.280 --> 0:17:14.000
<v Speaker 1>And then because it's a terrorist organization. Essentially, you see him,

0:17:14.000 --> 0:17:16.360
<v Speaker 1>he's making the case, Hey, they're beyond this is They're

0:17:16.400 --> 0:17:20.240
<v Speaker 1>not a nation state, They're not one nation. He's not.

0:17:21.320 --> 0:17:24.400
<v Speaker 1>It's fascinating that he does not mention the word Venezuela here,

0:17:26.680 --> 0:17:29.240
<v Speaker 1>because if if he was talking about a country, he'd

0:17:29.280 --> 0:17:33.880
<v Speaker 1>have to go to Congress. But they're trying to make

0:17:33.960 --> 0:17:36.520
<v Speaker 1>the case that this is this is not about a

0:17:36.520 --> 0:17:39.200
<v Speaker 1>specific country, but a specific country hasn't done any work,

0:17:39.240 --> 0:17:41.920
<v Speaker 1>and therefore there's a threat to the United States and

0:17:42.320 --> 0:17:46.840
<v Speaker 1>taking out this ship, not boarding it, not sending the

0:17:46.880 --> 0:17:52.080
<v Speaker 1>message that way, not arresting these individuals or boarding the

0:17:52.200 --> 0:17:56.479
<v Speaker 1>ship or frankly, to make sure you know what you know,

0:17:58.560 --> 0:18:01.119
<v Speaker 1>they quote just decided to send message. This is what

0:18:01.240 --> 0:18:05.840
<v Speaker 1>Secretary Review said. And again, I know politically this is

0:18:05.880 --> 0:18:08.560
<v Speaker 1>going to seem popular and justifies the means we're getting

0:18:08.640 --> 0:18:13.200
<v Speaker 1>rid of these bad Narco traffickers. This is good Venezuela.

0:18:13.280 --> 0:18:19.000
<v Speaker 1>If Maduro's upset, this is good. But we have a constitution,

0:18:20.480 --> 0:18:25.800
<v Speaker 1>we have a process. We're sitting here behaving no different

0:18:25.840 --> 0:18:31.600
<v Speaker 1>than Putin's been behaving in his region. He designated Ukraine

0:18:31.720 --> 0:18:34.919
<v Speaker 1>is essentially a threat like this. They were not he

0:18:35.080 --> 0:18:38.280
<v Speaker 1>used the word Nazis, and all of this has been

0:18:38.440 --> 0:18:43.520
<v Speaker 1>his rationale for invading this country in their own sort

0:18:43.560 --> 0:18:49.359
<v Speaker 1>of again claiming some version of self defense. This is

0:18:49.880 --> 0:18:53.280
<v Speaker 1>the same crap that Putin's pulling, except he's not in

0:18:53.280 --> 0:18:57.280
<v Speaker 1>a democracy. And we are show us your evidence that

0:18:57.359 --> 0:18:59.320
<v Speaker 1>you knew what was on that boat before you blew

0:18:59.359 --> 0:19:02.600
<v Speaker 1>it up. You just decided to blow it up. Are

0:19:02.600 --> 0:19:05.240
<v Speaker 1>they going to share this intelligence when we have a

0:19:05.320 --> 0:19:09.040
<v Speaker 1>Congress that's acting as if it is an equal, coequal

0:19:09.080 --> 0:19:13.080
<v Speaker 1>branch of government, there'd be some immediate hearings. I haven't

0:19:13.080 --> 0:19:18.040
<v Speaker 1>heard anything. It's been crickets on this, and it appears

0:19:18.240 --> 0:19:23.640
<v Speaker 1>we're going to do more. And it's interesting, you know,

0:19:23.480 --> 0:19:27.800
<v Speaker 1>you see the political fallout from this was, you know,

0:19:27.880 --> 0:19:30.720
<v Speaker 1>Jade Vance is sort of the social media defender, mainstream

0:19:30.760 --> 0:19:33.520
<v Speaker 1>social media defender. Trump does this crazy truth social posts

0:19:33.520 --> 0:19:36.040
<v Speaker 1>that you make it into sort of mainstream social media

0:19:36.240 --> 0:19:39.239
<v Speaker 1>with retreats and all this stuff. But Vance is the

0:19:39.240 --> 0:19:44.200
<v Speaker 1>one he actively is on there, and he basically said

0:19:44.680 --> 0:19:46.520
<v Speaker 1>he thought this was the highest and best use of

0:19:46.560 --> 0:19:50.159
<v Speaker 1>the military. And he had this back and forth with

0:19:50.320 --> 0:19:56.120
<v Speaker 1>an anti Trump, a guy named Brian Crassenstein and who

0:19:56.160 --> 0:19:58.560
<v Speaker 1>denounced the strike. Then called it a war crime, and

0:19:58.600 --> 0:20:00.560
<v Speaker 1>then Vance just simply wrote back, I don't give a

0:20:00.600 --> 0:20:04.320
<v Speaker 1>shit what you call it. Well, what's interesting about that statement,

0:20:05.600 --> 0:20:10.200
<v Speaker 1>because again, what we did and our lack of rationale

0:20:10.200 --> 0:20:14.240
<v Speaker 1>and our lack of justification before we did the attack

0:20:14.280 --> 0:20:16.560
<v Speaker 1>and just waiting until after the fact, because we have

0:20:16.640 --> 0:20:20.160
<v Speaker 1>to take the Trump administration's word for this. His word

0:20:20.280 --> 0:20:22.920
<v Speaker 1>is not good with the American people. At best. It's

0:20:23.000 --> 0:20:25.800
<v Speaker 1>forty percent of the country that accept accept things he says,

0:20:25.800 --> 0:20:29.440
<v Speaker 1>a face value majority does not. Certainly a majority of

0:20:29.440 --> 0:20:35.720
<v Speaker 1>the world does not. So Vance basically says, I don't

0:20:35.720 --> 0:20:39.040
<v Speaker 1>give a shit. And that's when Rand Paul jumps in,

0:20:39.160 --> 0:20:43.360
<v Speaker 1>Republican senator from Kentucky, who's, of course more of a libertarian,

0:20:43.720 --> 0:20:49.040
<v Speaker 1>and he's certainly somebody who believes that Congress has a

0:20:49.080 --> 0:20:52.840
<v Speaker 1>lot more authority to exert when it comes to military decisions,

0:20:54.240 --> 0:20:58.800
<v Speaker 1>and he called that statement, what a despicable and thoughtless

0:21:00.720 --> 0:21:04.800
<v Speaker 1>sentiment it is to glorify killing someone without a trial.

0:21:06.400 --> 0:21:08.240
<v Speaker 1>And that was the point he even said, it was

0:21:08.280 --> 0:21:11.639
<v Speaker 1>really interesting. He goes, I should read you the whole tweet.

0:21:11.640 --> 0:21:13.280
<v Speaker 1>Some of you may have seen it, but let me

0:21:13.320 --> 0:21:16.320
<v Speaker 1>read you the whole tweet. JD. I don't give a shit.

0:21:16.359 --> 0:21:19.600
<v Speaker 1>Advance says, killing people he accuses of a crime is

0:21:19.640 --> 0:21:22.480
<v Speaker 1>the quote highest and best use of the military unquote.

0:21:23.000 --> 0:21:25.480
<v Speaker 1>And then Paul goes here, he goes, did he ever

0:21:25.520 --> 0:21:27.879
<v Speaker 1>read to kill a mockingbird? Did he ever wonder what

0:21:28.000 --> 0:21:32.040
<v Speaker 1>might happen if the accused were immediately executed without trial

0:21:32.119 --> 0:21:36.359
<v Speaker 1>or representation? And then the next sentence, which has gotten

0:21:36.400 --> 0:21:40.520
<v Speaker 1>some mainstream play. What a despicable and thoughtless sentiment it

0:21:40.600 --> 0:21:46.840
<v Speaker 1>is to glorify killing someone without a trial. So look,

0:21:46.880 --> 0:21:49.960
<v Speaker 1>I don't expect this current makeup of Congress to engage

0:21:49.960 --> 0:21:52.280
<v Speaker 1>in this, right, I mean part of the problem. Again,

0:21:52.320 --> 0:21:54.800
<v Speaker 1>this is the whole. The Trump administration does five or

0:21:54.840 --> 0:21:57.840
<v Speaker 1>six things that deserve extra scrutiny. In messing with the

0:21:57.840 --> 0:22:00.520
<v Speaker 1>independence of the FED is another one. The use of

0:22:00.560 --> 0:22:04.399
<v Speaker 1>the military as domestic police officers is one. Then there's

0:22:04.520 --> 0:22:09.479
<v Speaker 1>this and essentially conducting military action against a foreign country.

0:22:10.640 --> 0:22:13.800
<v Speaker 1>We didn't say it here that it's Venezuela. Venezuela sees

0:22:13.840 --> 0:22:16.159
<v Speaker 1>it as an attack. So are we at war with Venezuela?

0:22:16.200 --> 0:22:18.240
<v Speaker 1>Are we about to go to war? Are we about

0:22:18.280 --> 0:22:20.959
<v Speaker 1>to do regime change? Now? Trump was smart enough some lawyer,

0:22:21.119 --> 0:22:23.440
<v Speaker 1>his White House Council got to him. He did not

0:22:23.600 --> 0:22:25.679
<v Speaker 1>go down that road. He can be very sloppy with

0:22:25.720 --> 0:22:28.560
<v Speaker 1>his argument with his statements sometimes, but he did not

0:22:28.640 --> 0:22:31.800
<v Speaker 1>say anything about that. He said no, no, no, because

0:22:31.800 --> 0:22:34.879
<v Speaker 1>the minute he says that, then he essentially lied in

0:22:34.880 --> 0:22:37.560
<v Speaker 1>in the statement of Congress when he informed them based

0:22:37.600 --> 0:22:41.320
<v Speaker 1>on the Warpowers Act. So this is one of those stories.

0:22:41.359 --> 0:22:46.080
<v Speaker 1>It should be consuming Washington in a world without social

0:22:46.119 --> 0:22:50.520
<v Speaker 1>media algorithms that are more obsessed about Jeffrey Epstein. And

0:22:50.560 --> 0:22:53.040
<v Speaker 1>I sit here and I understand this, But when you

0:22:53.080 --> 0:22:56.080
<v Speaker 1>look at all the stories that we're all dealing with

0:22:56.200 --> 0:23:02.159
<v Speaker 1>right now, it's still Jeffrey Epstein that seems to be

0:23:02.320 --> 0:23:06.679
<v Speaker 1>where traditional media is trying to go because it trends better,

0:23:06.880 --> 0:23:10.000
<v Speaker 1>or because social media algorithms report it. Whatever it is.

0:23:10.000 --> 0:23:13.560
<v Speaker 1>This has totally warped the news cycle a little bit.

0:23:14.119 --> 0:23:17.440
<v Speaker 1>This issue with Venezuela should be first and foremost right now.

0:23:17.800 --> 0:23:21.479
<v Speaker 1>The economy is right there, and law enforcement in our cities,

0:23:21.520 --> 0:23:27.240
<v Speaker 1>these sort of collectively here, this is sort of challenges

0:23:27.320 --> 0:23:31.280
<v Speaker 1>to the constitution right in front of our face, right

0:23:31.320 --> 0:23:35.920
<v Speaker 1>in front of our face, and most of the obsession

0:23:35.960 --> 0:23:40.080
<v Speaker 1>and the coverage and even political attention elected leaders, where

0:23:40.119 --> 0:23:44.080
<v Speaker 1>are they gravitating to? They're not gravitating towards many of

0:23:44.119 --> 0:23:50.760
<v Speaker 1>these stories on this anyway. But what have we learned

0:23:50.800 --> 0:23:54.320
<v Speaker 1>from sort of all of this? Over the weekend, we'll

0:23:54.320 --> 0:23:56.800
<v Speaker 1>say this a vance Rand Paul primary is going to

0:23:56.840 --> 0:23:59.160
<v Speaker 1>be fascinating, it's going to be interesting, and it's going

0:23:59.200 --> 0:24:03.200
<v Speaker 1>to be nasty. We'll see how far we get there.

0:24:03.200 --> 0:24:10.240
<v Speaker 1>We'll see whether Rand Paul his what his political standing

0:24:10.240 --> 0:24:15.160
<v Speaker 1>looks like in two years. But he's now. It's interesting

0:24:15.160 --> 0:24:19.160
<v Speaker 1>to me watching him. He is been a bit more

0:24:19.200 --> 0:24:21.920
<v Speaker 1>combative with the Trump administration. He doesn't do it as

0:24:22.000 --> 0:24:25.280
<v Speaker 1>much sort of on the floor of the Senate, and

0:24:25.320 --> 0:24:29.359
<v Speaker 1>he's not really been you know, it's not like he's organic.

0:24:29.520 --> 0:24:30.800
<v Speaker 1>It's not like he went out of his way to

0:24:30.840 --> 0:24:33.160
<v Speaker 1>try to get more people to stop the one Big

0:24:33.200 --> 0:24:34.880
<v Speaker 1>Beautiful Bill, even though he wasn't a fan of it.

0:24:36.600 --> 0:24:41.480
<v Speaker 1>But he does seem to be carving out a place

0:24:41.760 --> 0:24:43.359
<v Speaker 1>he's trying to He's going to try to make an

0:24:43.359 --> 0:24:46.719
<v Speaker 1>ideological argument. Now, the question is whether the party is

0:24:46.760 --> 0:24:49.120
<v Speaker 1>interested in an ideological debate or this is a cult

0:24:49.119 --> 0:24:53.000
<v Speaker 1>of personality debate. And I think, you know, Rand Paul

0:24:53.040 --> 0:24:55.359
<v Speaker 1>was hoping to have this ideological debate in twenty fifteen,

0:24:55.600 --> 0:24:57.520
<v Speaker 1>and a guy came down the escalator and turned it

0:24:57.560 --> 0:25:00.600
<v Speaker 1>into a cult of personality debate and the rest his history.

0:25:13.160 --> 0:25:15.800
<v Speaker 1>All Right, I told you before I get to my

0:25:15.840 --> 0:25:20.679
<v Speaker 1>little sports page for the week, I'm day viewing a

0:25:20.680 --> 0:25:24.040
<v Speaker 1>new segment, and I am calling this segment this Week

0:25:24.040 --> 0:25:26.879
<v Speaker 1>in History, basically your history and Chuck Todd's history lesson.

0:25:28.880 --> 0:25:33.120
<v Speaker 1>One of the things that I find shocking is how

0:25:33.200 --> 0:25:36.920
<v Speaker 1>often I see, really, you know, this current generation, whether

0:25:36.960 --> 0:25:40.520
<v Speaker 1>it's political reporters, elected officials, sometimes how little they know

0:25:40.600 --> 0:25:45.600
<v Speaker 1>about information about things that happen in the twentieth century. Now,

0:25:45.720 --> 0:25:47.080
<v Speaker 1>not everything I'm going to do is this going to

0:25:47.080 --> 0:25:50.520
<v Speaker 1>be twentieth century. But each week I'm going to be

0:25:50.560 --> 0:25:55.800
<v Speaker 1>looking for an event that happened in that week sometime

0:25:55.840 --> 0:25:59.480
<v Speaker 1>in the last one hundred years, and we're going to

0:25:59.520 --> 0:26:05.200
<v Speaker 1>do a quickly explainer about it and go from there.

0:26:05.440 --> 0:26:09.600
<v Speaker 1>So this week, and by week is September eighth through

0:26:09.640 --> 0:26:13.040
<v Speaker 1>the fourteenth. That's the window. And each week it'll be

0:26:13.119 --> 0:26:15.359
<v Speaker 1>Monday through the Sunday. That's the window. I'm going to

0:26:15.400 --> 0:26:18.800
<v Speaker 1>choose each week. Well, September eighth, nineteen seventy four is

0:26:18.800 --> 0:26:25.080
<v Speaker 1>one of the more momentous occasions in the history of

0:26:25.160 --> 0:26:29.000
<v Speaker 1>American of the American legal system. On October eight, nineteen

0:26:29.040 --> 0:26:33.560
<v Speaker 1>seventy four, just one month after Richard Nixon's resignation, the

0:26:33.600 --> 0:26:36.919
<v Speaker 1>new President Gerald Ford issued a full and preemptive pardon

0:26:37.200 --> 0:26:40.600
<v Speaker 1>for all federal crimes that Richard Nixon quote committed or

0:26:40.600 --> 0:26:44.639
<v Speaker 1>may have committed during his presidency. The decision at the

0:26:44.640 --> 0:26:49.160
<v Speaker 1>time was unprecedented, it was controversial, and it was probably

0:26:49.200 --> 0:26:53.919
<v Speaker 1>the defining moment of Ford's very short presidency. My longtime mentor,

0:26:53.960 --> 0:26:57.520
<v Speaker 1>Doug Bailey may rest in peace. I don't think he's

0:26:58.440 --> 0:27:02.080
<v Speaker 1>I worry sometimes he sees what's happening right now. It's

0:27:02.119 --> 0:27:05.639
<v Speaker 1>not a he's not at the piece he would like

0:27:05.680 --> 0:27:10.560
<v Speaker 1>to be at. But Doug Bailey was Gerald Ford sort

0:27:10.560 --> 0:27:13.840
<v Speaker 1>of chief, one of his chief media strategists in that

0:27:13.880 --> 0:27:19.119
<v Speaker 1>seventy six campaign. And when you look at all of

0:27:19.160 --> 0:27:22.120
<v Speaker 1>the baggage that Nixon was carrying into that campaign, inflation

0:27:22.280 --> 0:27:28.720
<v Speaker 1>was a big one, right, Stagflation. Being Nixon's vice president,

0:27:28.920 --> 0:27:31.679
<v Speaker 1>it was the part. It was the part, and they

0:27:31.720 --> 0:27:33.399
<v Speaker 1>came with it. Look, when you only lose by a

0:27:33.400 --> 0:27:36.920
<v Speaker 1>percentage point in the national popular vote. It's pretty easy

0:27:37.240 --> 0:27:39.760
<v Speaker 1>to look at anything and say, oh, jeezs Bob Dole

0:27:39.800 --> 0:27:42.400
<v Speaker 1>hadn't accused the Democratic Party of starting World War Two,

0:27:42.440 --> 0:27:47.280
<v Speaker 1>that would have maybe that was worth a point, maybe,

0:27:48.560 --> 0:27:52.960
<v Speaker 1>but that the umbrella issue that was hanging over the head.

0:27:53.160 --> 0:27:55.320
<v Speaker 1>Why did Jimmy Carter end up the nominee not somebody

0:27:55.359 --> 0:27:58.160
<v Speaker 1>else in the Democratic Party because he was completely from

0:27:58.160 --> 0:28:03.400
<v Speaker 1>outside Washington of faith right, So it was Nixon informed

0:28:03.400 --> 0:28:08.320
<v Speaker 1>the entire political environment at the time, and he lost

0:28:08.320 --> 0:28:09.960
<v Speaker 1>for the part. Now here was the case for the

0:28:10.000 --> 0:28:14.119
<v Speaker 1>part at the time. Ford made the argument for national

0:28:14.160 --> 0:28:17.639
<v Speaker 1>healing right, our long national nightmare, although that was mixing

0:28:17.680 --> 0:28:20.199
<v Speaker 1>my speeches there, but essentially that was the message. He

0:28:20.320 --> 0:28:23.359
<v Speaker 1>argued the country needed to move beyond Watergate focus on

0:28:23.400 --> 0:28:25.920
<v Speaker 1>the economic and the Cold War challenges that were very

0:28:26.000 --> 0:28:29.199
<v Speaker 1>real in the seventies. This country was very We had

0:28:29.880 --> 0:28:33.800
<v Speaker 1>really crappy economy, so that was a problem, and there

0:28:33.840 --> 0:28:36.679
<v Speaker 1>was a real belief that a war with Russia with

0:28:36.800 --> 0:28:39.440
<v Speaker 1>the Soviet Union wasn't it if it was simply a win.

0:28:41.960 --> 0:28:47.320
<v Speaker 1>Another case for it was that the there would have

0:28:47.320 --> 0:28:50.160
<v Speaker 1>been endless trials. And this is the political reason for

0:28:50.280 --> 0:28:52.080
<v Speaker 1>if you're Ford or you're the Ford White House. It

0:28:52.080 --> 0:28:55.160
<v Speaker 1>would have been a complete utter distraction. The prosecution would

0:28:55.240 --> 0:28:58.560
<v Speaker 1>have dominated his presidency, and it would have probably destabilized

0:28:58.600 --> 0:29:03.400
<v Speaker 1>our politics. How well did the Trump trials? How did

0:29:03.400 --> 0:29:05.560
<v Speaker 1>the country handle that he wasn't a city in as

0:29:05.600 --> 0:29:12.840
<v Speaker 1>a former president. Accepting the pardon meant that Nixon sort

0:29:12.880 --> 0:29:16.640
<v Speaker 1>of confessed that that was one of the other arguments

0:29:16.400 --> 0:29:20.520
<v Speaker 1>that the pardon worked. By accepting the pardon, Nixon implied

0:29:20.560 --> 0:29:24.440
<v Speaker 1>guilt under Urdick versus the United States in nineteen fifteen,

0:29:24.840 --> 0:29:27.200
<v Speaker 1>which is as if you accept the pardon, essentially you're

0:29:27.200 --> 0:29:34.040
<v Speaker 1>accepting you committed some crime. Now the quest and it's

0:29:34.440 --> 0:29:36.680
<v Speaker 1>and in two thousand and one he got the Kennedy

0:29:36.720 --> 0:29:41.080
<v Speaker 1>family gave him the Profile and Courage Award because it

0:29:41.120 --> 0:29:44.280
<v Speaker 1>has been interpreted as if that it was politically courageous

0:29:45.600 --> 0:29:48.760
<v Speaker 1>because Ford did it even though he knew would hurt

0:29:48.800 --> 0:29:52.560
<v Speaker 1>him politically, but he acted for what he viewed was

0:29:52.600 --> 0:29:56.840
<v Speaker 1>the greater good. I think you could easily look at

0:29:56.840 --> 0:29:58.360
<v Speaker 1>it as that he was trying to do what was

0:29:58.400 --> 0:30:01.640
<v Speaker 1>in the best interests of the Ford presidency, which was

0:30:01.680 --> 0:30:06.320
<v Speaker 1>to get all things Nixon behind him. So I think

0:30:06.360 --> 0:30:09.240
<v Speaker 1>it's sort of I really think It depends where you

0:30:09.360 --> 0:30:13.560
<v Speaker 1>sit on whether it was a courageous argument putting country

0:30:13.600 --> 0:30:17.280
<v Speaker 1>over party, or did you put his presidency over the

0:30:17.360 --> 0:30:21.040
<v Speaker 1>rule of law as well? Right, But that to me's

0:30:21.080 --> 0:30:24.480
<v Speaker 1>debate points now, well, the arguments against the pardon, both

0:30:24.480 --> 0:30:27.160
<v Speaker 1>at the time and today are pretty much the same.

0:30:27.880 --> 0:30:31.760
<v Speaker 1>The pardon meant you're going to lose accountability, right, that

0:30:31.880 --> 0:30:35.240
<v Speaker 1>it undermined the principle that no one is above the law,

0:30:35.240 --> 0:30:39.200
<v Speaker 1>even the president, and that by issuing this pardon we

0:30:39.440 --> 0:30:43.640
<v Speaker 1>essentially said political leaders are immune from the basic laws

0:30:43.680 --> 0:30:47.520
<v Speaker 1>of prosecutions because of who you know. Right. I certainly

0:30:47.520 --> 0:30:51.200
<v Speaker 1>think that over time this isn't aged. Well, I'm giving

0:30:51.200 --> 0:30:53.840
<v Speaker 1>it away where I sort of lean on this, And

0:30:53.880 --> 0:30:55.560
<v Speaker 1>there was a time twenty years ago I might have

0:30:55.680 --> 0:30:59.800
<v Speaker 1>argued that I might have accepted the historical verdict that said, oh,

0:30:59.840 --> 0:31:01.160
<v Speaker 1>this was the right thing to do. It he of

0:31:01.200 --> 0:31:08.160
<v Speaker 1>the country allowed us to move on. But it's set

0:31:08.200 --> 0:31:13.400
<v Speaker 1>a dangerous president, and I think now, in hindsight, we

0:31:13.480 --> 0:31:18.320
<v Speaker 1>have decided that trying to get political accountability is too hard.

0:31:19.480 --> 0:31:22.640
<v Speaker 1>Right now, Look, I do think the founders were right

0:31:22.760 --> 0:31:25.400
<v Speaker 1>that the best place to put a president on trial

0:31:25.520 --> 0:31:29.840
<v Speaker 1>was in the United States, Senate, the Democrats, not just

0:31:29.880 --> 0:31:33.480
<v Speaker 1>the Democrats, Republicans obviously in the second one that was

0:31:33.520 --> 0:31:37.040
<v Speaker 1>attempted with Trump twice, and he was acquitted in that

0:31:37.160 --> 0:31:40.840
<v Speaker 1>court twice. Now I could argue that that should have

0:31:41.000 --> 0:31:45.960
<v Speaker 1>probably preempted that when you know, that was the where

0:31:45.960 --> 0:31:50.800
<v Speaker 1>the Founder said a president, an elected president, is held accountable.

0:31:51.880 --> 0:31:59.640
<v Speaker 1>And I could make the case in hindsight that all

0:31:59.680 --> 0:32:02.680
<v Speaker 1>those other independent jurisdiction sort of laid down their arms,

0:32:02.800 --> 0:32:06.560
<v Speaker 1>if you know, that was the most appropriate place to

0:32:06.640 --> 0:32:08.640
<v Speaker 1>try to hold them accountable was in the United States.

0:32:12.840 --> 0:32:16.320
<v Speaker 1>But had Ford never pardoned Nixon and we'd had a

0:32:16.360 --> 0:32:21.160
<v Speaker 1>trial and he had been convicted and had served time,

0:32:22.480 --> 0:32:24.840
<v Speaker 1>Here's what we don't know, right there was an assumption

0:32:24.920 --> 0:32:29.640
<v Speaker 1>that somehow it might have it might have created, it

0:32:29.720 --> 0:32:32.880
<v Speaker 1>might have turned him into a political martyr in some cases.

0:32:33.480 --> 0:32:38.360
<v Speaker 1>I guess we're seeing an alternative universe here in Brazil

0:32:39.440 --> 0:32:46.120
<v Speaker 1>right where instead of letting it go with Bolsonaro, the

0:32:46.200 --> 0:32:49.160
<v Speaker 1>current administration is deciding to go ahead with a prosecution

0:32:49.240 --> 0:32:53.640
<v Speaker 1>on Bolsnaro and banning him from the ballot and all

0:32:53.680 --> 0:32:57.160
<v Speaker 1>those things that come with it. Perhaps that's what could

0:32:57.160 --> 0:33:02.160
<v Speaker 1>have been done with Nixon, was our system strong enough

0:33:02.160 --> 0:33:06.880
<v Speaker 1>to handle it. Ford's decision implies that he didn't think

0:33:07.040 --> 0:33:09.520
<v Speaker 1>the country was going to be able to handle it.

0:33:11.520 --> 0:33:14.080
<v Speaker 1>But this was one of those cases where if you know,

0:33:14.200 --> 0:33:18.120
<v Speaker 1>and I go back to if you don't trust the voters,

0:33:18.160 --> 0:33:20.520
<v Speaker 1>and what are we doing with this experiment anyway? Right,

0:33:20.600 --> 0:33:23.320
<v Speaker 1>like the argument about the Constitutional convention. Oh no, if

0:33:23.360 --> 0:33:26.520
<v Speaker 1>you do that, there might be some people who who

0:33:26.560 --> 0:33:29.680
<v Speaker 1>may have some wacko wacko ideas that they introduce. Yeah,

0:33:29.960 --> 0:33:34.880
<v Speaker 1>welcome to America. Okay, we we have people on every

0:33:34.960 --> 0:33:38.280
<v Speaker 1>single notch of the political spectrum. Of course, there's going

0:33:38.360 --> 0:33:41.600
<v Speaker 1>to be all sorts of but there's a process, and

0:33:41.680 --> 0:33:43.760
<v Speaker 1>there's there's a process that should make it so that

0:33:43.800 --> 0:33:50.680
<v Speaker 1>it's fairly mainstream. But the minute you start making decisions

0:33:50.680 --> 0:33:55.320
<v Speaker 1>that take away the ability of the American voter or

0:33:55.360 --> 0:34:01.680
<v Speaker 1>the American system to do its thing, to essentially usurped

0:34:01.680 --> 0:34:05.960
<v Speaker 1>the democratic process, which is what Ford did. I think

0:34:05.960 --> 0:34:09.040
<v Speaker 1>it turns out, especially given what we've gone through over

0:34:09.040 --> 0:34:15.239
<v Speaker 1>the last decade, that despite what was over time and

0:34:15.280 --> 0:34:19.200
<v Speaker 1>what's interesting pulling over time right at the time, a

0:34:19.280 --> 0:34:22.839
<v Speaker 1>majority of the country, including according to an exit poll

0:34:22.880 --> 0:34:25.400
<v Speaker 1>in the seventy six presidential race, a majority of the

0:34:25.440 --> 0:34:28.120
<v Speaker 1>country thought the pardon was wrong. Fifty five percent thought

0:34:28.120 --> 0:34:32.160
<v Speaker 1>it was a mistake. By the early eighties, it was

0:34:32.200 --> 0:34:35.759
<v Speaker 1>sort of a split decision. In eighty six, it was

0:34:35.800 --> 0:34:38.280
<v Speaker 1>the first time any pole ever showed a majority support

0:34:38.560 --> 0:34:41.520
<v Speaker 1>for the part. Part of that may have been sort of,

0:34:41.560 --> 0:34:44.120
<v Speaker 1>you know, Reagan's popularity helped the country had sort of

0:34:44.719 --> 0:34:47.960
<v Speaker 1>moved sort of into center right situation. Maybe that is

0:34:48.000 --> 0:34:52.720
<v Speaker 1>why Nixon had sort of rehabbed himself, had become mister

0:34:52.800 --> 0:34:56.560
<v Speaker 1>foreign dignitary, if you will, writing books, mister foreign policy advisor.

0:34:56.840 --> 0:35:00.000
<v Speaker 1>A few months later, Bill Clinton, you know, I remember

0:35:00.000 --> 0:35:02.719
<v Speaker 1>when Bill Clinton made the trek to visit with former

0:35:02.760 --> 0:35:09.839
<v Speaker 1>President Nixon before he died. But I think when you

0:35:10.040 --> 0:35:12.799
<v Speaker 1>think about the situation we're in now, where it's not

0:35:12.920 --> 0:35:15.000
<v Speaker 1>clear there's a rule of lawe where we've now had

0:35:15.080 --> 0:35:18.160
<v Speaker 1>a president, we've had a fear that presidents would issue

0:35:18.200 --> 0:35:23.200
<v Speaker 1>preemptive pardons, and out of fear of a president weaponizing

0:35:23.239 --> 0:35:26.840
<v Speaker 1>the legal system, a president went ahead and issued a

0:35:26.880 --> 0:35:30.400
<v Speaker 1>preemptive pardon for a bunch of his family members. And

0:35:30.400 --> 0:35:33.360
<v Speaker 1>I'm referring, of course, to Joe Biden. Does any of

0:35:33.400 --> 0:35:36.239
<v Speaker 1>this happen without the initial decision by Gerald Ford to

0:35:36.280 --> 0:35:41.759
<v Speaker 1>pardon Richard Nixon. Some of you may say, obviously the

0:35:41.800 --> 0:35:46.480
<v Speaker 1>best I think the best outcome would have been. I

0:35:46.520 --> 0:35:48.480
<v Speaker 1>don't think the former president of the United States should

0:35:48.480 --> 0:35:51.600
<v Speaker 1>serve time. I might have drawn the line on that.

0:35:54.320 --> 0:35:57.359
<v Speaker 1>You commute the sentence, but you let you make him

0:35:57.360 --> 0:36:00.560
<v Speaker 1>go under on trial, you go through that whole process.

0:36:03.480 --> 0:36:08.360
<v Speaker 1>Then you commute the sentence. You see if he's guilty

0:36:08.440 --> 0:36:12.759
<v Speaker 1>or not. He should have his due process. Nixon never

0:36:12.800 --> 0:36:19.640
<v Speaker 1>got his due process. So I think it. You know,

0:36:19.680 --> 0:36:26.560
<v Speaker 1>it's interesting the Ford pardon for the longest period of time,

0:36:26.920 --> 0:36:30.959
<v Speaker 1>aged very well, and I think when we look back

0:36:31.000 --> 0:36:33.320
<v Speaker 1>on it, and I look back on it and everything

0:36:33.360 --> 0:36:38.680
<v Speaker 1>I did when you it is just this. This was

0:36:38.719 --> 0:36:42.600
<v Speaker 1>the wrong action at the wrong time, in the wrong country.

0:36:45.880 --> 0:36:49.560
<v Speaker 1>You know it just it is if if you believe

0:36:49.600 --> 0:36:53.120
<v Speaker 1>in the rule of law, you should have let it

0:36:53.160 --> 0:36:58.920
<v Speaker 1>work its will. That everything about our system is supposed

0:36:58.920 --> 0:37:05.560
<v Speaker 1>to make us different, including that, but instead that pardon. Essentially,

0:37:05.880 --> 0:37:09.040
<v Speaker 1>what we've done is that was the beginning of treating

0:37:09.040 --> 0:37:12.880
<v Speaker 1>the presidency like a monarchy where they're kind of untouchable.

0:37:14.160 --> 0:37:17.960
<v Speaker 1>All right, there's your history lesson. It was September eighth,

0:37:18.480 --> 0:37:23.080
<v Speaker 1>nineteen seventy four that this pardon was issued, and fifty

0:37:23.080 --> 0:37:26.279
<v Speaker 1>one years later, Let's just say I think it's now

0:37:26.280 --> 0:37:30.680
<v Speaker 1>a stain unpresidential decision making. Joe Ford was a good man,

0:37:31.960 --> 0:37:36.560
<v Speaker 1>no doubt about it. This was a patriot, but they

0:37:36.560 --> 0:37:40.080
<v Speaker 1>made the wrong call. All right, my quick little Before

0:37:40.080 --> 0:37:44.439
<v Speaker 1>I get to a few questions, you gotta understand how

0:37:44.920 --> 0:37:48.600
<v Speaker 1>how I viewed college football. I mean, is it is

0:37:48.719 --> 0:37:52.200
<v Speaker 1>for me? It's everything. So I watched every second of

0:37:52.239 --> 0:37:55.400
<v Speaker 1>the Miami Bethune Cookman game. Here are things that made

0:37:55.440 --> 0:37:58.640
<v Speaker 1>me extraordinarily excited. First of all, they unleashed the offense

0:37:58.680 --> 0:38:02.080
<v Speaker 1>a little bit. Carson had zip on his ball. It

0:38:02.160 --> 0:38:05.200
<v Speaker 1>now makes me think that the Notre Dame game plan

0:38:05.400 --> 0:38:08.440
<v Speaker 1>was very conservative, was very careful, and this is an

0:38:08.440 --> 0:38:12.600
<v Speaker 1>offense that is very likely to get better as they

0:38:12.640 --> 0:38:15.000
<v Speaker 1>keep adding more things. So let's just say I am

0:38:15.040 --> 0:38:19.480
<v Speaker 1>cautiously enthusiastic. Miami plays at the University of South Florida

0:38:19.560 --> 0:38:25.360
<v Speaker 1>next week, which is just upended poor Sunbup Billy Billy Napier,

0:38:25.400 --> 0:38:26.960
<v Speaker 1>the coach of the Gators. I just find that they'd

0:38:27.000 --> 0:38:29.359
<v Speaker 1>be the funniest nickname for it. That's one of those

0:38:29.400 --> 0:38:31.120
<v Speaker 1>I'm not gonna explain if you know, you know, but

0:38:31.200 --> 0:38:34.880
<v Speaker 1>sunbout poor sunbup Billy losing to a group of five teams,

0:38:34.880 --> 0:38:37.080
<v Speaker 1>and South Florida may be the best group of five teams.

0:38:37.080 --> 0:38:40.880
<v Speaker 1>Maybe not? Is Boise State any good? You know? The

0:38:40.960 --> 0:38:43.359
<v Speaker 1>thing that I had to remind my own son right,

0:38:43.520 --> 0:38:46.840
<v Speaker 1>is LSU any good? Clemson was losing to Troy. We

0:38:46.920 --> 0:38:50.680
<v Speaker 1>don't know who's good or not yet. I think Miami's good.

0:38:51.680 --> 0:38:56.640
<v Speaker 1>I think Florida State's good. I think Ohio State's good.

0:38:56.680 --> 0:38:59.359
<v Speaker 1>I think Penn State's good. Looks like Texas is going

0:38:59.400 --> 0:39:03.239
<v Speaker 1>to be pretty good. What about Alabama? Alabama? Man, they

0:39:03.320 --> 0:39:05.680
<v Speaker 1>they certainly got their act together. And yes, it was,

0:39:05.920 --> 0:39:09.719
<v Speaker 1>you know, against the little sisters, you know, and there's

0:39:09.840 --> 0:39:11.600
<v Speaker 1>week two has a lot of little Sisters of the

0:39:11.600 --> 0:39:15.439
<v Speaker 1>poor games. It's amazing how many, how many, how many

0:39:15.440 --> 0:39:18.360
<v Speaker 1>teams the Little Sisters play. It's one of my favorite

0:39:18.360 --> 0:39:20.879
<v Speaker 1>cliches to use in college football. So you're gonna hear

0:39:20.880 --> 0:39:26.680
<v Speaker 1>me do it a lot. But I uh. The couple

0:39:26.719 --> 0:39:28.920
<v Speaker 1>other things that jumped out of me from over the

0:39:28.920 --> 0:39:34.960
<v Speaker 1>weekend was I was bummed to see what happened with Duke. Financially,

0:39:35.600 --> 0:39:37.560
<v Speaker 1>I had I had a good week that would have

0:39:37.560 --> 0:39:40.640
<v Speaker 1>been fantastic had my my friend Manny Diaz, the head

0:39:40.640 --> 0:39:43.720
<v Speaker 1>coach of the Duke Blue Devils, had showed up. But man,

0:39:43.840 --> 0:39:45.919
<v Speaker 1>every time I turned around, they were turning the ball over.

0:39:47.040 --> 0:39:51.920
<v Speaker 1>That is one of the biggest misleading finals of the weekend.

0:39:51.920 --> 0:39:55.560
<v Speaker 1>Be very careful, assuming you know for sure that Illinois

0:39:55.680 --> 0:39:59.360
<v Speaker 1>is good and is the new Indiana they were. Duke

0:39:59.480 --> 0:40:04.440
<v Speaker 1>gave away so many possessions in that game, So be careful,

0:40:05.000 --> 0:40:07.280
<v Speaker 1>be very very careful. And then I have to close

0:40:07.280 --> 0:40:09.759
<v Speaker 1>with the disappointment of my one of my new teams.

0:40:09.800 --> 0:40:11.080
<v Speaker 1>The way we look at it, anytime I have a

0:40:11.160 --> 0:40:13.520
<v Speaker 1>family connection, that becomes one of my teams that I

0:40:13.600 --> 0:40:15.239
<v Speaker 1>keep an eye on and I try to root for

0:40:15.280 --> 0:40:17.600
<v Speaker 1>as long as they're not playing Miami. So Florida State

0:40:17.680 --> 0:40:20.759
<v Speaker 1>is now back in there. That's my wife, Alum. I

0:40:20.760 --> 0:40:24.600
<v Speaker 1>have now family connections to Auburn, So I'm i'm I'm

0:40:24.640 --> 0:40:26.640
<v Speaker 1>trying to be nice and not say bad things about

0:40:26.920 --> 0:40:30.600
<v Speaker 1>coach Freeze. Obviously I've got I'm paying money over at

0:40:30.640 --> 0:40:35.080
<v Speaker 1>SMU these days that oh can't blow it to score lyad.

0:40:35.800 --> 0:40:38.000
<v Speaker 1>As I said to my son, SMU has the offense

0:40:38.040 --> 0:40:40.680
<v Speaker 1>of a playoff team, But the defense of a group

0:40:40.719 --> 0:40:45.239
<v Speaker 1>of five teams, so that but fear not, SMU fans,

0:40:45.880 --> 0:40:48.759
<v Speaker 1>they're spending real money. They're going to be in the

0:40:48.760 --> 0:40:52.160
<v Speaker 1>top tier. They lost a whole bunch of great defensive

0:40:52.200 --> 0:40:56.719
<v Speaker 1>linemen to the NFL, so that's why they were so

0:40:56.840 --> 0:40:58.560
<v Speaker 1>poorous and it was so easy to run on them.

0:40:59.040 --> 0:41:01.840
<v Speaker 1>They'll fix this, maybe not this season, maybe not in

0:41:01.920 --> 0:41:04.400
<v Speaker 1>time to be playoff contender, but still don't sleep on

0:41:04.480 --> 0:41:08.359
<v Speaker 1>them because they can score a lot of points and

0:41:08.400 --> 0:41:11.040
<v Speaker 1>it can be an exciting game. By the way, my

0:41:11.080 --> 0:41:13.960
<v Speaker 1>favorite game might have been the Kansas Missouri game, the

0:41:14.120 --> 0:41:17.720
<v Speaker 1>old border war. Speaking of history lessons, I would encourage

0:41:17.719 --> 0:41:20.799
<v Speaker 1>you to take a look at the history of that.

0:41:21.080 --> 0:41:24.120
<v Speaker 1>I mean, it really was. When they first started playing,

0:41:25.040 --> 0:41:28.319
<v Speaker 1>blood was really bad. It was Civil War blood, like

0:41:28.600 --> 0:41:32.759
<v Speaker 1>the actual Civil War type of disputes. Still that was

0:41:32.800 --> 0:41:36.040
<v Speaker 1>still lingering when that rivalry began. So always fun when

0:41:36.080 --> 0:41:37.880
<v Speaker 1>you see a rivalry that hadn't been going on for

0:41:37.920 --> 0:41:41.279
<v Speaker 1>a while come back like that. That's what makes college

0:41:41.280 --> 0:41:44.080
<v Speaker 1>football great. That's why I love college football so much,

0:41:44.120 --> 0:41:46.439
<v Speaker 1>and that's why I wish the two major conferences weren't

0:41:46.440 --> 0:41:49.120
<v Speaker 1>trying to squeeze everybody else of this all right, I'm

0:41:49.160 --> 0:41:52.279
<v Speaker 1>off my quick sports soapbox. So with that, let's take

0:41:52.280 --> 0:41:56.440
<v Speaker 1>a few questions, sneak in some mess chuck ass chuck.

0:42:00.960 --> 0:42:03.640
<v Speaker 1>All right, I've gone all along with my little history

0:42:03.640 --> 0:42:07.719
<v Speaker 1>thing today, so I'll probably do the lion's share of

0:42:07.960 --> 0:42:11.600
<v Speaker 1>question answering for the Thursday episode, but let me sneak

0:42:11.640 --> 0:42:15.040
<v Speaker 1>in a couple here this week. First question comes from

0:42:15.080 --> 0:42:19.840
<v Speaker 1>overseas Dublin, Ireland. Comes from Danny Oh, Danny Boy from Dublin, Ireland.

0:42:19.840 --> 0:42:22.000
<v Speaker 1>Thank you very much, love the podcast. I don't think

0:42:22.040 --> 0:42:24.680
<v Speaker 1>Putin could handle Trump the way you suggested. He knows

0:42:24.719 --> 0:42:27.680
<v Speaker 1>Trump would spin even a short CeaseFire's proof of his influence.

0:42:27.880 --> 0:42:30.439
<v Speaker 1>Putin granted a ceasefire because I asked him, and Trump

0:42:30.480 --> 0:42:33.719
<v Speaker 1>would never stop boasting about it. That would quickly become magadogma,

0:42:33.920 --> 0:42:36.439
<v Speaker 1>which would be excruciating for Putin, worse than any short

0:42:36.440 --> 0:42:38.600
<v Speaker 1>lived credit he'd get for the ceasefire. Thoughts, keep up

0:42:38.600 --> 0:42:40.680
<v Speaker 1>the good work. It's an interesting way to look at it.

0:42:40.680 --> 0:42:44.000
<v Speaker 1>But here's the other thing Putin has made him look ridiculous. Right,

0:42:44.320 --> 0:42:46.520
<v Speaker 1>look at what Putin is doing now with Ukraine. He

0:42:46.640 --> 0:42:49.960
<v Speaker 1>is being more aggressive. He is going after government officials,

0:42:49.960 --> 0:42:52.960
<v Speaker 1>he's gone after European officials, He's gone after places in

0:42:53.160 --> 0:42:56.440
<v Speaker 1>Ukraine that haven't been touched before. He's doing it with impunity,

0:42:56.440 --> 0:43:00.319
<v Speaker 1>and the United States is sitting here in silence. And

0:43:00.360 --> 0:43:06.160
<v Speaker 1>that I mean, look, I go back. I think, you know,

0:43:06.800 --> 0:43:10.560
<v Speaker 1>I am surprised that Putin didn't try to strengthen Trump,

0:43:11.120 --> 0:43:13.919
<v Speaker 1>the perception of Trump by giving him a short cease fire.

0:43:13.960 --> 0:43:16.120
<v Speaker 1>That's why I think this is one of those if

0:43:16.120 --> 0:43:21.520
<v Speaker 1>you're the if you're the KGB operative portion of Putin's brain, right,

0:43:22.280 --> 0:43:26.080
<v Speaker 1>you give a little something so that the Europeans are

0:43:26.120 --> 0:43:30.839
<v Speaker 1>of no choice. But now by totally snubbing, he is

0:43:30.880 --> 0:43:36.000
<v Speaker 1>potentially making it. It's making it harder for Trump to

0:43:36.120 --> 0:43:40.239
<v Speaker 1>somehow defend Putin and serve as this buffer that he's

0:43:40.280 --> 0:43:43.680
<v Speaker 1>been serving as against the West. And I think, I mean,

0:43:43.719 --> 0:43:46.680
<v Speaker 1>you're going to have h Look, you've a whole bunch

0:43:46.680 --> 0:43:49.600
<v Speaker 1>of Republican senators who are spineless about going up against

0:43:49.640 --> 0:43:52.920
<v Speaker 1>Trump on all these other things, but they are willing

0:43:52.960 --> 0:43:56.520
<v Speaker 1>to to to get tough on Russia, and I'm Putin.

0:43:57.360 --> 0:44:00.680
<v Speaker 1>I think it's inevitable that this is coming. Uh, But

0:44:00.760 --> 0:44:02.960
<v Speaker 1>I do think this has been what what when you

0:44:03.040 --> 0:44:05.600
<v Speaker 1>just look at it as far as you know, people

0:44:05.640 --> 0:44:07.320
<v Speaker 1>like to say, oh, Putin is such a chess player.

0:44:07.400 --> 0:44:11.440
<v Speaker 1>It's not a chess move. This is sort of dumb checkers.

0:44:12.120 --> 0:44:14.839
<v Speaker 1>He's just counting on Trump being weak and right now

0:44:14.880 --> 0:44:18.680
<v Speaker 1>Trump is extraordinarily weak, and that's a you know, and

0:44:18.719 --> 0:44:24.560
<v Speaker 1>that has emboldened that weakness is emboldened Putin. Now, if

0:44:24.560 --> 0:44:28.560
<v Speaker 1>you want to talk about political messaging, I don't know

0:44:28.600 --> 0:44:31.560
<v Speaker 1>where the where the opposition to this is in the

0:44:31.640 --> 0:44:34.200
<v Speaker 1>in in you know, it's it's it's sort of there.

0:44:34.480 --> 0:44:36.360
<v Speaker 1>But the way to go after Trump on this is

0:44:36.400 --> 0:44:40.440
<v Speaker 1>he is weak. Putin has spit. He is He has

0:44:40.600 --> 0:44:43.480
<v Speaker 1>done what Jalen Carter did to Dak Prescott. He has

0:44:43.680 --> 0:44:51.400
<v Speaker 1>literally spit on Trump's red tie. And Trump's not can

0:44:51.440 --> 0:44:55.879
<v Speaker 1>do anything about it, not a thing, all right? Next

0:44:55.960 --> 0:44:58.880
<v Speaker 1>question Sandro from Italy. Wow, we have a we have

0:44:58.880 --> 0:45:01.320
<v Speaker 1>a theme today. Hello check Sandro, a listener from Italy.

0:45:01.840 --> 0:45:04.240
<v Speaker 1>The reason Epstein File's discussion made me think about public

0:45:04.280 --> 0:45:07.560
<v Speaker 1>trust in victims. Watching the Depth versus Herd trial at seventeen,

0:45:07.640 --> 0:45:11.439
<v Speaker 1>I saw how misogynistic attacks and online trolling dehumanized Herd,

0:45:11.800 --> 0:45:14.600
<v Speaker 1>turning serious abuse allegations into jokes and fueling a one

0:45:14.600 --> 0:45:17.840
<v Speaker 1>sided narrative. I worry Epstein's victims could face similar treatment,

0:45:17.880 --> 0:45:21.320
<v Speaker 1>defamation suits, tax and credibility, and a loss of political support.

0:45:21.600 --> 0:45:24.360
<v Speaker 1>Why do female victims and even female politicians face this

0:45:24.440 --> 0:45:27.360
<v Speaker 1>dehumanization while Trump has avoided the same level of scrutiny

0:45:27.520 --> 0:45:33.080
<v Speaker 1>from the media. Thanks well, I think he's gotten I

0:45:33.080 --> 0:45:35.240
<v Speaker 1>don't know if I agree that he hasn't gotten scrutiny

0:45:35.239 --> 0:45:37.640
<v Speaker 1>from the media. I think he's gotten scrutiny from the media.

0:45:37.680 --> 0:45:42.120
<v Speaker 1>That's not the issue. The question is why doesn't it stick? Right?

0:45:42.320 --> 0:45:45.080
<v Speaker 1>Why do these things stick to others but it doesn't

0:45:45.120 --> 0:45:48.200
<v Speaker 1>to him? Now, in part, he's got all sorts, you know.

0:45:48.960 --> 0:45:51.440
<v Speaker 1>Part of it is, you know he's he is mister distraction,

0:45:51.880 --> 0:45:53.960
<v Speaker 1>and everybody always thinking, so this is a distraction for

0:45:54.040 --> 0:45:58.080
<v Speaker 1>this there's no one thing that's a distraction specifically for

0:45:58.120 --> 0:46:01.680
<v Speaker 1>another thing. It is this is how he wants. He

0:46:01.719 --> 0:46:05.480
<v Speaker 1>wants seven things, seven balls in the air, so that

0:46:05.560 --> 0:46:09.319
<v Speaker 1>it looks like he's there's always something going on, and

0:46:09.440 --> 0:46:11.600
<v Speaker 1>you know he can do is and and and it

0:46:11.640 --> 0:46:14.640
<v Speaker 1>has allowed them what what what second term Trump is?

0:46:14.840 --> 0:46:20.040
<v Speaker 1>Guys like to Stephen Miller and others have figured out

0:46:20.040 --> 0:46:22.919
<v Speaker 1>how to use the fog of Trump set a fog

0:46:22.960 --> 0:46:26.600
<v Speaker 1>of war, right, using the fog of Trump to sort

0:46:26.600 --> 0:46:30.440
<v Speaker 1>of manipulate and take advantage of him and get him

0:46:30.480 --> 0:46:35.080
<v Speaker 1>to do things in extraordinarily aggressive actions, like what he's

0:46:35.080 --> 0:46:40.080
<v Speaker 1>doing right now in Venezuela. But I would argue, I mean,

0:46:40.239 --> 0:46:45.800
<v Speaker 1>my goodness, I mean the singling out Trump's misogynistic behavior

0:46:45.800 --> 0:46:50.480
<v Speaker 1>and his character. I mean the entire Access Hollywood tape.

0:46:50.520 --> 0:46:52.759
<v Speaker 1>I mean, we had a And I think that's the

0:46:52.800 --> 0:46:55.120
<v Speaker 1>problem sometimes with our politics. You know, you have such

0:46:55.160 --> 0:47:01.480
<v Speaker 1>a high profile moment like that, and it dominates a

0:47:01.600 --> 0:47:05.000
<v Speaker 1>couple of weeks of the final four weeks of that campaign,

0:47:06.680 --> 0:47:08.440
<v Speaker 1>and then there's this sense so we got by it,

0:47:08.560 --> 0:47:11.560
<v Speaker 1>so don't ever worry about using it again. Like there's

0:47:11.600 --> 0:47:15.360
<v Speaker 1>this weird mindset in political campaigns that once you survive,

0:47:16.480 --> 0:47:20.759
<v Speaker 1>if you get elected, and the attacks thrown at you

0:47:20.880 --> 0:47:24.040
<v Speaker 1>don't stick enough to cause you enough to win that election,

0:47:24.160 --> 0:47:26.120
<v Speaker 1>to cause you to lose that election, and you win

0:47:27.080 --> 0:47:30.240
<v Speaker 1>for whatever reason, political opponents stop using the same material

0:47:30.239 --> 0:47:32.560
<v Speaker 1>they think, well, we can't like. And there is an

0:47:32.600 --> 0:47:37.280
<v Speaker 1>old news thing, right that has been effective for Corpa

0:47:37.360 --> 0:47:39.279
<v Speaker 1>politicians in the past've been able to say, oh, that's

0:47:39.280 --> 0:47:44.279
<v Speaker 1>old news. I don't know why we're bringing that up. Well,

0:47:44.320 --> 0:47:46.120
<v Speaker 1>I know why you're bringing it up, because it deserves

0:47:46.120 --> 0:47:48.440
<v Speaker 1>to be brought up. But the point is is that

0:47:49.360 --> 0:47:53.360
<v Speaker 1>because it's it's part of trying to figure out what

0:47:53.480 --> 0:47:57.480
<v Speaker 1>makes these politicians stick. But you're right, I mean, this

0:47:57.560 --> 0:47:59.720
<v Speaker 1>hasn't gotten the same and I think in some ways,

0:47:59.760 --> 0:48:03.000
<v Speaker 1>you know, so those that don't like Trump have their

0:48:03.000 --> 0:48:06.200
<v Speaker 1>point of view. Those that do have decided to compartmentalize this.

0:48:07.280 --> 0:48:09.080
<v Speaker 1>You know, it goes to it's sort of like why

0:48:09.080 --> 0:48:13.280
<v Speaker 1>did the character attacks. It's funny they never worked against Clinton,

0:48:13.360 --> 0:48:15.279
<v Speaker 1>the Democrats when Clinton was in office, but when he

0:48:15.320 --> 0:48:18.760
<v Speaker 1>was leaving office, the sort of the character stuck, stuck

0:48:18.800 --> 0:48:21.200
<v Speaker 1>a little bit the gore, and he had to figure

0:48:21.200 --> 0:48:23.600
<v Speaker 1>out a way to distance himself from it. Right, it

0:48:23.640 --> 0:48:24.880
<v Speaker 1>was like the country was like, we're not going to

0:48:24.960 --> 0:48:28.440
<v Speaker 1>do it again. And that's why I am skeptical of

0:48:28.560 --> 0:48:31.080
<v Speaker 1>behaving like Trump. That the answer that I think the

0:48:31.120 --> 0:48:35.640
<v Speaker 1>next president wins because they're they have higher they have

0:48:35.680 --> 0:48:38.600
<v Speaker 1>a higher they have perceived higher character than Trump. I

0:48:38.600 --> 0:48:41.000
<v Speaker 1>say perceived, because you can have people that can hold

0:48:41.000 --> 0:48:45.080
<v Speaker 1>themselves up as high character and they're they're hiding low character. Tendencies.

0:48:45.719 --> 0:48:49.120
<v Speaker 1>But my assumption is the public doesn't want this kind

0:48:49.200 --> 0:48:53.080
<v Speaker 1>of self enrichment, amoral and immoral behavior out of their

0:48:53.160 --> 0:48:56.520
<v Speaker 1>chief executives. I just I don't buy that. All right,

0:48:56.560 --> 0:49:00.680
<v Speaker 1>I'm gonna steak in one more question here, uh, and

0:49:00.719 --> 0:49:02.880
<v Speaker 1>this one comes, We're going to go stateside here, Adam

0:49:02.880 --> 0:49:05.440
<v Speaker 1>in Minneapolis, he said, I love hearing your discussion on

0:49:05.480 --> 0:49:08.239
<v Speaker 1>the best comedy Satirical writers a while back and was

0:49:08.360 --> 0:49:10.680
<v Speaker 1>very excited to hear you conclude with Trey Parker and

0:49:10.719 --> 0:49:12.960
<v Speaker 1>Matt Stone in South Park. Curious to hear if you

0:49:13.000 --> 0:49:18.360
<v Speaker 1>have tuned into the current season a spoiler alert. I have. Personally,

0:49:18.440 --> 0:49:20.440
<v Speaker 1>I had to spit out my drink moment when I

0:49:20.440 --> 0:49:22.399
<v Speaker 1>saw Trump with the classics that I'm cut out face

0:49:22.440 --> 0:49:25.480
<v Speaker 1>and voice. Love to hear any thoughts on the political

0:49:25.520 --> 0:49:33.160
<v Speaker 1>salience of the direction this season best, Adam, Well, it's

0:49:33.200 --> 0:49:36.839
<v Speaker 1>interesting because you know, they're they're they're to me, they're

0:49:36.880 --> 0:49:42.000
<v Speaker 1>calling card. Over the last decade has really been on

0:49:39.800 --> 0:49:49.000
<v Speaker 1>on trying to sort of call out cultural hypocrisy from

0:49:49.000 --> 0:49:54.040
<v Speaker 1>both from the woke left and the grievance right, and

0:49:53.680 --> 0:49:58.360
<v Speaker 1>Andy they've so effectively, I think culturally still even in

0:49:58.400 --> 0:50:03.279
<v Speaker 1>these episodes I think have mocked both quite well. You know,

0:50:03.320 --> 0:50:07.080
<v Speaker 1>It's funny. What I've noticed is that the coverage of

0:50:07.760 --> 0:50:11.000
<v Speaker 1>each South Park episode is almost done exclusively through the

0:50:11.040 --> 0:50:15.759
<v Speaker 1>prism of Trump. But I thought I thought the uh

0:50:18.560 --> 0:50:23.520
<v Speaker 1>I thought the last episode or no, I think it

0:50:23.520 --> 0:50:25.760
<v Speaker 1>was two episodes ago, the one that featured Tim Cook

0:50:27.920 --> 0:50:29.960
<v Speaker 1>was as much about the tech world and the sort

0:50:29.960 --> 0:50:31.920
<v Speaker 1>of the bowing down. Anyway, the point is is that

0:50:32.000 --> 0:50:35.799
<v Speaker 1>I think, what's I again, They're They're not They're not

0:50:35.960 --> 0:50:41.279
<v Speaker 1>late leaving anything untouched here at all. But it is

0:50:41.320 --> 0:50:44.360
<v Speaker 1>a direct There's no doubt this is a direct response

0:50:44.440 --> 0:50:47.320
<v Speaker 1>to sort of what I would say is almost maga

0:50:48.000 --> 0:50:53.600
<v Speaker 1>and and sort of a morality of Trump. But look,

0:50:53.640 --> 0:50:58.160
<v Speaker 1>it's been let's just say, they've done things that I

0:50:58.200 --> 0:51:01.360
<v Speaker 1>can't even feel like I can repeat. Obviously I could.

0:51:01.400 --> 0:51:04.200
<v Speaker 1>There's you know, this is the world of independent media.

0:51:04.280 --> 0:51:08.280
<v Speaker 1>We can do what we want, but it feels next

0:51:08.600 --> 0:51:12.720
<v Speaker 1>level over the top. But then I could also argue

0:51:12.719 --> 0:51:14.680
<v Speaker 1>that in this day and age, in order for anything

0:51:14.719 --> 0:51:19.520
<v Speaker 1>to break through the algorithms and break through in some ways,

0:51:20.160 --> 0:51:23.680
<v Speaker 1>do you have to go that far. So there's there's

0:51:23.680 --> 0:51:26.400
<v Speaker 1>a there's a part of me that you know we have,

0:51:26.600 --> 0:51:30.399
<v Speaker 1>really I don't think we have fully appreciated how much

0:51:30.440 --> 0:51:34.280
<v Speaker 1>we've sort of gotten rid of every guard rail possible

0:51:34.320 --> 0:51:38.600
<v Speaker 1>when it comes to sort of political satire and commentary.

0:51:39.280 --> 0:51:42.879
<v Speaker 1>There's pretty much there's no line, there's no guardrail, there's

0:51:42.880 --> 0:51:49.440
<v Speaker 1>no norm, and some of it is funny, but we're

0:51:49.480 --> 0:51:52.600
<v Speaker 1>actually doing what I would say is real satire, because

0:51:52.640 --> 0:51:55.359
<v Speaker 1>the best satire should make you a little uncomfortable before

0:51:55.360 --> 0:51:59.319
<v Speaker 1>it makes you laugh. And I think this season South

0:51:59.400 --> 0:52:04.840
<v Speaker 1>Park is making you a little bit uncomfortable just before

0:52:04.880 --> 0:52:10.399
<v Speaker 1>you laugh. All right with that, I think we can

0:52:10.440 --> 0:52:13.359
<v Speaker 1>put a pin in this episode. Appreciate you out there.

0:52:13.360 --> 0:52:16.920
<v Speaker 1>We've been by the way, response has been terrific, and

0:52:17.480 --> 0:52:22.040
<v Speaker 1>people are out of their August doldrums. That's exciting. I'm

0:52:22.040 --> 0:52:27.759
<v Speaker 1>having the I'm enjoying this, enjoying this medium, appreciate the

0:52:27.960 --> 0:52:31.320
<v Speaker 1>opportunity it gives me to sort of complete whole thoughts

0:52:31.360 --> 0:52:34.000
<v Speaker 1>and to sort of do, as Trump likes to say,

0:52:34.000 --> 0:52:36.560
<v Speaker 1>my own little weave about sort of how I'm watching

0:52:36.560 --> 0:52:41.359
<v Speaker 1>the current American political system as it potentially unravels in

0:52:41.360 --> 0:52:45.279
<v Speaker 1>front of our very eyes, and so I feel like

0:52:45.480 --> 0:52:48.440
<v Speaker 1>chronicling this almost on a daily basis is necessary as

0:52:48.440 --> 0:52:51.560
<v Speaker 1>we figure out how we can navigate our way out

0:52:51.640 --> 0:52:55.000
<v Speaker 1>of this mess, and so with that, I will upload

0:52:55.040 --> 0:53:00.360
<v Speaker 1>again in approximately forty eight hours. Y