Speaker 1: Let not your heart be troubled. You are listening to
Speaker 1: the Sean Hannity Radio Show podcast. If you're like me
Speaker 1: and suffer from insomnia, you know what, that's not fun.
Speaker 1: You know I tried everything I couldn't get a good
Speaker 1: night's sleep. And this is neither drug nor alcohol induced.
Speaker 1: That's right. It is my pillow. Mike Lindell invented it
Speaker 1: and he fitted me for my first my pillow, and
Speaker 1: it's changed my life. I fall asleep faster, stay asleep longer,
Speaker 1: and the good news you can too. Let go to
Speaker 1: my pillow dot com promo code Sean and take advantage
Speaker 1: of one of Mike Glendell's best offers, his special four pack.
Speaker 1: You get fifty percent off to my Pillow Premium Pillows
Speaker 1: to go Anywhere Pillows. My Pillows made in the USA,
Speaker 1: has a sixty day unconditional money back guaranteed no risk
Speaker 1: to you, and attend you warranty. You don't want to
Speaker 1: spend more sleepless nights on a pillow tossing interney that's
Speaker 1: not working for you. Just go to my pillow dot
Speaker 1: com right now, use the promo code Sean and you
Speaker 1: get Mike Glendell's special four pack. You get to my
Speaker 1: Pillow Premium Pillows to Go Anywhere pillows fifty percent off,
Speaker 1: and you'll start getting the kind of peaceful and RESTful
Speaker 1: and comfortable and deep, peeling and recrupitive sleep he'd been
Speaker 1: craving and deserve my pillow dot com promo coach Seawn
Speaker 1: all Right class huge breaking news from the New York Times.
Speaker 1: The raid. This is the headline. Maggie Haberman and Company.
Speaker 1: The raid on Trump's lawyers sought records on the Access
Speaker 1: Hollywood tape, and the judge in the case involving Cone
Speaker 1: and and Stormy Daniel said, can both sides of you
Speaker 1: go work this out? This is ridiculous And although I
Speaker 1: doubt that's gonna happen based on some of the TV
Speaker 1: appearances that I've seen by so many, anyway, glad you
Speaker 1: are with us. The President today has pretty much made
Speaker 1: it known something that I have been saying is coming,
Speaker 1: and that is that enough is enough, and the president
Speaker 1: is not gonna take it anymore. And the President is
Speaker 1: not going to be a punching bag anymore, and the
Speaker 1: President is not gonna make himself available anymore on all
Speaker 1: of this stuff. I'll get into that in a second. Uh,
Speaker 1: James Comey apparently already did his sit down as it
Speaker 1: relates to George Stephanopolis. Now think about this. George Stephanopolis,
Speaker 1: the number one Clinton sycophant in the entire news media,
Speaker 1: gets James Comey's first interview, and so they're promoting his questions.
Speaker 1: One of them is about an answer I guess that
Speaker 1: Comy gives comparing Donald Trump to a mob boss. Listen,
Speaker 1: how strange is it for you to sit here and
Speaker 1: compare the president to a mob boss? This Sunday Night
Speaker 1: on ABC had things that you know, but having said
Speaker 1: that could damage President Trump. Jeames Comey and to those
Speaker 1: who say you should have brought Hillary Clinton before grand jury,
Speaker 1: the exclusive interview, everyone will be talking about his President
Speaker 1: Trump and starting justice. Should Donald Trump be impeached? Stephanopolis
Speaker 1: Comy this Sunday night at a special time ten nins
Speaker 1: Central on ABC. Uh, you know it's always about the
Speaker 1: Carle family. It's always about the Trump crime family. What
Speaker 1: what about what about the macrime family. They call me
Speaker 1: grand family or Hillary Clinton grand family. Why is it
Speaker 1: all the Trump grand family? You know? I tell Michael
Speaker 1: I called this businesses and for Sonny yes, Donald Jr. No, Donald,
Speaker 1: don't get into this business, but they get in anyway.
Speaker 1: And look at where we are. I mean, is this
Speaker 1: really what we have? Why are you laughing? I don't
Speaker 1: think it's that good. I love him, man, it's great. Um,
Speaker 1: I mean we got Comy now comparing the President of
Speaker 1: the United States to a crime family. So which crime
Speaker 1: family you know? Which mobster is it? Is it al Capone?
Speaker 1: You know, let's see Chicago based, Uh, you know, he
Speaker 1: has it at the Campone family and and the mafia boss.
Speaker 1: Let's see gambling, prostitution, boot legging, narcotics, traffic being, robbery, bribery, murder, extortion.
Speaker 1: Pretty long list for al Capone. So let's compare the
Speaker 1: President of the United States former FBI director. You know
Speaker 1: who is most angry at Comey of everybody that I
Speaker 1: know are people in the FBI. You know who's most
Speaker 1: angry at Mueller are people in the FBI and in
Speaker 1: the intelligence community. They think this is so far of
Speaker 1: an overreach. And what they're now doing is they're creating
Speaker 1: a constitutional showdown here. And the President's not gonna take
Speaker 1: it anymore. And I'll get into his his tweets about
Speaker 1: this in just a second, or maybe we'll compare what
Speaker 1: are we comparing him? A lucky Luciano? You know, crime
Speaker 1: boss organized crime nineteen thirties. Let's see, Luciana was sentenced
Speaker 1: to thirty to fifty years in jail. You got a
Speaker 1: shorter term, by the way, many people don't know this
Speaker 1: in exchange for helping the US military during World War
Speaker 1: two and and part of that had to do with
Speaker 1: the Navy U S. Navy's plan and it's invasion of Italy.
Speaker 1: And he used some of his Italian connections, apparently according
Speaker 1: to the sources. What are we gonna compare it? Whatnot
Speaker 1: John Gotti, the head of New York Scambino crime family,
Speaker 1: and it will compare him to him. Let's see, he
Speaker 1: was charged with jury convicted Gotti of thirteen murders and
Speaker 1: a slew of other crimes after he had gotten off
Speaker 1: many many times. And god he received life in prison
Speaker 1: without the possibility of parole, and he died in prison.
Speaker 1: Let's see who maybe Frank Lucas. Remember Frank Lucas, Remember
Speaker 1: Denzel Washington and Russell Crowe. They did a great job
Speaker 1: in that movie. It was incredible about the life story
Speaker 1: of Frank Lucas. It was a big He was largely
Speaker 1: responsible for the influx of heroin into New York City
Speaker 1: in the nineteen seventies and and bringing it in direct
Speaker 1: from Vietnam with a purity that nobody had ever seen before,
Speaker 1: and a drug enforcement agency task force eventually got the
Speaker 1: best of him. He was sentenced to seventy years in prison.
Speaker 1: He actually then became best friends with the guy that
Speaker 1: put him in jail, who became a lawyer, which is
Speaker 1: an interest seeing sidebar. If you haven't watched the movie,
Speaker 1: I think it's worth watching. Um. Anyway, so this is
Speaker 1: where we are, and um it speaks volumes what we're
Speaker 1: seeing here. If you if you've got a special counsel
Speaker 1: Mueller who's now going into the president's personal attorney's office,
Speaker 1: home and hotel room and stealing everything. And then we're
Speaker 1: just being told just trust us. Really we're supposed to
Speaker 1: trust you. Well, maybe if if Comey is gonna make
Speaker 1: this characterization compare the president to a mob family and
Speaker 1: a mob boss, well then we can maybe we'll start
Speaker 1: examining the Comey crime family, and we'll start talking about, oh,
Speaker 1: him leaking privileged information, which is not allowed to do
Speaker 1: in government information to a professor at Columbia for the
Speaker 1: sole purpose that is BFF Robert Mueller get appointed, and
Speaker 1: then maybe we can talk about Comey and the chrome
Speaker 1: Collmey crime family and and the activities he had with
Speaker 1: Peter Struck when they were exonerating Ullary Clinton of multiple
Speaker 1: felonies that we all know we're committed. And then of course,
Speaker 1: I guess as part of that would be Peter Struck's lover,
Speaker 1: which of course is Lisa Page. And you got so,
Speaker 1: you got Comey, you got Struck, you got Paige part
Speaker 1: of this crime family, the Collmey crime family. And then
Speaker 1: of course we can add to that Andrew McCabe because
Speaker 1: you know they had their insurance policy plan B. If
Speaker 1: God forbid, Donald Trump won, and I guess we could
Speaker 1: probably add to the list. Loretta Lynch is part of
Speaker 1: that family. You know, we got the Obama deep state
Speaker 1: crime family. We can talk about that, We could talk
Speaker 1: about the Mueller crime family. Look at Mueller is you
Speaker 1: know here you've got Rod Rosenstein's at the top of
Speaker 1: that list. Rod Rosenstein, who himself should have been conflicted
Speaker 1: out of appointing Mueller in the first place. McCabe is
Speaker 1: a part of both families. I guess then we've got
Speaker 1: Rod Rosenstein, you know, appointing Mueller. Rod Rosenstein also which
Speaker 1: I think is pretty funny. Uh himself he's involved in
Speaker 1: in nefarious activity and God only knows what. And you
Speaker 1: know we're now getting this is now it So the
Speaker 1: president has no real option or choice here, and any
Speaker 1: lawyer that would recommend that he talked to Mueller after
Speaker 1: the crap that Mueller pulled in in the last you know,
Speaker 1: a couple of days, is out of their mind. Robert
Speaker 1: Mueller cannot be trusted. Rod Rosenstein, Okay, the guy that
Speaker 1: didn't want any information about the FISA abuse coming to
Speaker 1: fruition none. He ran interference. He's the guy that also
Speaker 1: signed off on the renewal of the FISA warrant against
Speaker 1: Carter Page. Trump associate that used what we know now
Speaker 1: know our Hillary Clinton bought and paid four lies that
Speaker 1: will put together by a foreign national to manipulate the
Speaker 1: American people in an election. They didn't tell the FISA
Speaker 1: judged the truth. That would be Rod Rosenstein, who's guilty
Speaker 1: of that. And Rod Rosenstein, you know, there's the same
Speaker 1: guy that slow walks every bit of information about FISA
Speaker 1: abuse about information involving the Clinton email server, about lying
Speaker 1: to VISA judges. Oh so, so, I guess he's got
Speaker 1: his own family. And then I guess we can look
Speaker 1: at the Clinton crime family, which is at the the
Speaker 1: nexus of everything, and we're gonna make all these mob connections.
Speaker 1: Is this is now the language that James Comey wants
Speaker 1: to use. I guess we can all use his analogy.
Speaker 1: I guess you know. And if you've got to compare
Speaker 1: the president to a mobster and a murderer and a
Speaker 1: drug dealer and somebody involved an extortion and prostitution, the
Speaker 1: only true thing is he was involved in gambling, but
Speaker 1: that was legal gambling because he did have casinos at
Speaker 1: some point in his career. Now, at this point, the
Speaker 1: president really has no choice. What what has happened here?
Speaker 1: And everybody needs to understand what's gone on here is
Speaker 1: Robert Muller was negotiating with the president's attorneys for an interview,
Speaker 1: and they want to go shating, what the terms, what
Speaker 1: the conditions would be, what the follow ups would be,
Speaker 1: what the topics would be. None of it had to
Speaker 1: do with Stormy Daniels. I can tell you my sources
Speaker 1: have confirmed that none of it had to do with
Speaker 1: Karen McDougall, none of it had to do with access Hollywood.
Speaker 1: And at the very same time Mueller is supposedly negotiating
Speaker 1: in good faith with the president's legal team, Well now
Speaker 1: we have him coordinating with the Southern District of New
Speaker 1: York to go in and raid the files of the
Speaker 1: president's personal attorney, which means they now have a deep
Speaker 1: dive into everything and anything Trump. And that basically, and
Speaker 1: I agree with Dersha which dirshy, which is a thousand
Speaker 1: percent right. Probably Michael Cohen's constitutional rights were violated just
Speaker 1: by seizing his records. And I think there's gonna now
Speaker 1: this is gonna be a long, long, protracted, never ending
Speaker 1: fight because obviously this has become a runaway trained by
Speaker 1: a rogue prosecutor that's got an agenda, and the agenda
Speaker 1: is to literally undo along with his deep state friends,
Speaker 1: a and a duly elected president and and pushed Trump
Speaker 1: out of power by any means necessary. You know, I
Speaker 1: know for a fact that they provided what unprecedented amounts
Speaker 1: of documents to Robert Muller and his team, over millions
Speaker 1: of pages documents, dozens of witnesses. They didn't assert a
Speaker 1: single privilege up to this point at all, and they
Speaker 1: haven't even threatened to do so. And then while the
Speaker 1: lawyers for Trump are preparing to meet with the Special
Speaker 1: Counsel for the interview he requested. While that's all happening,
Speaker 1: you got literally a raid going on in the home
Speaker 1: and offices of the personal attorney of the President of
Speaker 1: the United States, seizing documents on all issues that have
Speaker 1: nothing to do with Russia. And now they're leaking to
Speaker 1: the New York Times. While we're looking into the Stormy
Speaker 1: Daniels issue and the Karen McDougall issue, and we're looking
Speaker 1: into the access Holly, what does that any of this
Speaker 1: have to do with Trump Russia collusion. You do understand
Speaker 1: that the only reason that we are in this situation
Speaker 1: is because they can't find any collusion. And I do
Speaker 1: believe that they definitely, you know, want to set this
Speaker 1: president off so that he ends up firing everybody and
Speaker 1: then they can say seas obstructing justice. Never mind that
Speaker 1: the the so called justice in this case is non existent.
Speaker 1: It's a witch hunt anyway. The President had a lot
Speaker 1: of hard hitting tweets today, said so much fake news
Speaker 1: about what's going on in the White House. But things
Speaker 1: are very calm, very calculated. Big focus on open and
Speaker 1: fair trade in China, the coming North Korea meeting, and
Speaker 1: of course the vicious gas attack in Syria. President tweets
Speaker 1: it feels great to have John Bolton and Larry Cutlo onboard.
Speaker 1: We're doing things nobody thought was possible. Despite the never
Speaker 1: ending and corrupt Russia investigation, which takes tremendous time and focus,
Speaker 1: well now it's gone way beyond what its mandate is,
Speaker 1: and with the approval of Rod Rosenstein once again, which
Speaker 1: raises questions about, well, what what can be done about
Speaker 1: Rod Rosenstein will get to that in a second, anyway.
Speaker 1: And the President goes on and he says, no collusion,
Speaker 1: no obstruction other than I fight back, you know, Trey
Speaker 1: Gaudy one. So this isn't how innocent people act. And
Speaker 1: I'm like, yeah, that's how innocent people act. They screen
Speaker 1: they're innocent anyway. So now they do the unthinkable. They
Speaker 1: raid a lawyer's office for information. Very bad. And then
Speaker 1: now we have a situation the President tweeted out about
Speaker 1: Russia now vowing to shoot down any and all missiles
Speaker 1: that might be fired at Syria and retaliation for the
Speaker 1: gas attack against that as innocent men, women and children.
Speaker 1: So now the presidents saying, get ready Russia, because they
Speaker 1: will be coming nice new and smart missiles is what
Speaker 1: he's talking about. You shouldn't be partners with a gas
Speaker 1: killing animal who kills his people and enjoys it. And
Speaker 1: the President says, our relationship with Russia is now worse
Speaker 1: than it's ever been and that includes the Cold War.
Speaker 1: What a statement that is, think about it. And he
Speaker 1: goes on to say there's no reason for this. Russia
Speaker 1: needs us to help with their economy, something that would
Speaker 1: be very easy to do. We need all nations working
Speaker 1: together and stop the arms raised question mark, And he
Speaker 1: says much of the bad blood with Russia is caused
Speaker 1: by the fake and corrupt Russia investigation headed up by
Speaker 1: the old Democratic loyalists we've been pointing out, or people
Speaker 1: that work for Obama. The deep state. Mother is the
Speaker 1: most conflicted of all, except for Rosenstein, who signed the
Speaker 1: FISA renewal and the call me letter. It's all true,
Speaker 1: no collusion, So they go crazy. That's about it. No collusion.
Speaker 1: They've gone nuts, and now we're being of a former
Speaker 1: FBI director comparing the president to a mom boss. I
Speaker 1: can't you cannot make this up. But now, what what
Speaker 1: it's gonna be is this is gonna be a year
Speaker 1: two years of NonStop war, political war in the country.
Speaker 1: And by the way, we'll hamper the ability of the
Speaker 1: president to do his job, which hurts the American people
Speaker 1: all because a few people in the higher echelons of
Speaker 1: power are protecting themselves, not handing over documents related to
Speaker 1: their investigations, and doing anything possible to get anything on
Speaker 1: Trump to distract from all of the real issues that
Speaker 1: we know occurred. Well, this is a pretty good sign
Speaker 1: that something is going on in Syria. Russian warships in
Speaker 1: spite of Moscow vowing to shoot down any American missiles
Speaker 1: that might be fired on Syria. Well, now we have
Speaker 1: a report that eleven Russian destroyers and guided missile carriers
Speaker 1: have now fled Russia's major naval port in Syria, likely
Speaker 1: to avoid being destroyed in what has an expected US
Speaker 1: cruise missile attack in response to Syria's use of poison
Speaker 1: against Does anyone never noticed that Donald Trump, all the
Speaker 1: times that he confronts, let's say, North Korea, China, Russia,
Speaker 1: they always backed down. And that that's something that the
Speaker 1: left never seemed to understand in their lives, you know,
Speaker 1: And that's why I, you know, at this point now
Speaker 1: that you know, call me is viewing Donald Trump as
Speaker 1: I never wanted Donald Jr. To get into this business ever.
Speaker 1: It was always to be the carly on My business,
Speaker 1: not the Trump business. And now he's in and they
Speaker 1: can't get up, uh now, all right, so we'll use that.
Speaker 1: Let's see then, I guess we could talk about McCabe
Speaker 1: and Rosenstein and Baker and call Me himself, you know,
Speaker 1: all part of a big crime family. And Struck and
Speaker 1: Page are a part of the big crime fam Bruce
Speaker 1: Or and his wife Nellie is. Maybe we'll put Jennie
Speaker 1: Ray in the crime family. And Andrew Weisman is definitely
Speaker 1: in the crime family. And obviously Mueller's in the crime family.
Speaker 1: And let's see, who else are we gonna put in
Speaker 1: this crime family? Oh, Christopher Steele. Hillary Clinton, Well we
Speaker 1: have a whole separate crime family. The Clinton crime family
Speaker 1: is the worst. They their tactics are brutal. The amount
Speaker 1: of blood check twenty five to the top of the air.
Speaker 1: How do you let Hillary Clinton get away with destroying
Speaker 1: subpoena emails, the leading them, acid washing them, bleach bit,
Speaker 1: hard drives the whole bit, hammers devices, and uh, on
Speaker 1: top of all of it, violating, Uh, you're not allowed
Speaker 1: to mishandle classified top secret special access program information. By
Speaker 1: the way, and you know all these foreign intelligence agencies
Speaker 1: hacked into that mom and pop shop server that means
Speaker 1: Russia had classified top secret special access programming information. Yeah,
Speaker 1: the hostile Russia. That one, Uh, China that means North Korea,
Speaker 1: that means Iran. Who else did Yeah, thank you, Hillary did.
Speaker 1: But so she gets away with all of that. Come
Speaker 1: and company, me, the grand family, the Clinton grand family.
Speaker 1: It's like a bunch of breados. Then nobody here's like.
Speaker 1: Nobody's like Michael. I never want to don jr Oh
Speaker 1: Michael to get into this business. I warned them. I said,
Speaker 1: no politics, this is not okay. Well now it's going
Speaker 1: this way. House Freedom called this member and Chairman Mark
Speaker 1: Meadows and Jim Jordan are out there saying, you know what,
Speaker 1: We're gonna hold these top officials in the Justice Department
Speaker 1: and contempt at Congress, starting with Rod Rosenstein for stonewalling
Speaker 1: on the documents, not listening to subpoena's ignoring them pertaining
Speaker 1: to the FBI surveillance abuse scandal, adding that they're gonna
Speaker 1: they would back their threat by the House Intelligence Committee
Speaker 1: Chairman Devon Newness to impeach the FBI Director, Christopher Ray
Speaker 1: for the same offense. Now they're rating Michael Cohn's home
Speaker 1: office and hotel room. But yet Congress they get away
Speaker 1: with not handing over subpoena documents, which constitutionally they are
Speaker 1: they have to do. So now they have what to
Speaker 1: day is to save their jobs. This is gonna get interesting.
Speaker 1: Rohn de Santa say in the House, will pursue contempt
Speaker 1: charges against the Department of Justice if we don't have
Speaker 1: documents by tomorrow. A lot of people look, even Joe
Speaker 1: de Jennifer was saying the you know, all these anti
Speaker 1: Trumper's Rosenstein Ray, they're they're leading a soft coup against
Speaker 1: the president. They want to undo an election. I've been
Speaker 1: telling you and I've been right. I wish I was wrong,
Speaker 1: and now we've got call me calling the president of
Speaker 1: mob boss called me. The celebrity Alan Dersho had said
Speaker 1: it really well yesterday, but he said Tom just stop.
Speaker 1: What are you doing? Just stop? So we're gonna have
Speaker 1: to see what happens in the middle of this where
Speaker 1: waiting and watching. We expect to strike on Syria probably
Speaker 1: anytime soon, and you've got stuckure we need to protect Mueller. No,
Speaker 1: we don't. Actually, this is driving the left and sane
Speaker 1: because there's absolutely zero doubt that the president has the
Speaker 1: right to fire Mueller. Is it the wise thing to
Speaker 1: do politically? No, And Sarah Huckabee Sanders said yesterday reminded
Speaker 1: them that it was the Obama administration Solicitor General Neil
Speaker 1: Kate Towel, who was one of the authors of the
Speaker 1: pertinent pertinent regulations that we're talking about here, and it's
Speaker 1: pretty much a fad to completely. All the president asked
Speaker 1: to do is take one, you know, executive action, and
Speaker 1: he can fire all of them, including Mueller and Rosenstein
Speaker 1: and company. I saw that Dan Abrahams, who runs Law
Speaker 1: News and Media it he was on Good Morning America
Speaker 1: with Hillary BFF Georgie Stephanopolis and anyway, he said that
Speaker 1: if Mike Michael Cohen is likely to be indicted and
Speaker 1: that the case uh, in that case, the president will
Speaker 1: certainly pardon him. We all know that the power of
Speaker 1: the pardon is absolute. I didn't even thought about it
Speaker 1: till I've read that today. But that's a good point.
Speaker 1: So we're gonna end up doing this for nothing, and
Speaker 1: we have so McConnell is actually saying legislation and protect
Speaker 1: Mueller is not needed. Paul Ryan just has had enough.
Speaker 1: He said, I'm retiring at the end of this term. Senate.
Speaker 1: GOP leaders. You have even people like believe it or not,
Speaker 1: Charles Grasslely pushing to protect Muller. Y Mueller has gone rogue.
Speaker 1: This is a runaway train. This is off the rails.
Speaker 1: This is stuff that we never thought we'd see happen
Speaker 1: in this country. Now this has moved into the Access
Speaker 1: Hollywood tape Karen McDougall, and apparently Stormy is now a
Speaker 1: witness for Robert Mueller's special counsel. Alright, so now what
Speaker 1: the president has no choice. Obviously they don't want to
Speaker 1: negotiate in good faith. So now he's gonna go to
Speaker 1: war and will We'll see what happens. And the President
Speaker 1: ken directly fire Mueller. I don't think he should at
Speaker 1: this point. That's what they want him to do. That's
Speaker 1: what they're praying that he does. The only one that
Speaker 1: seems to have it right in the Senator is Ram
Speaker 1: Paul that this is a witch hunt and he abused
Speaker 1: as a thirty. The other person that got that right
Speaker 1: was Alan Dershowitz, A told old witch hunt and um
Speaker 1: what does any of this have to do with Russia collusion?
Speaker 1: I love this headline NBC News Stormy Daniels is cooperating
Speaker 1: with the Feds producing probing Trump's attorney for Stormy Daniels.
Speaker 1: They're talking about what an in kind a possibility of
Speaker 1: an inkind campaign contribution? Is there anything else? Now? They're
Speaker 1: even talking about taxi medallions. I'm saying taxi manute, what
Speaker 1: are you talking about? Um? So, Mark Meadows, I think
Speaker 1: is pretty clear that that Sessions, Rosenstein and should be
Speaker 1: in held in contempt and Ray be impeached here. And
Speaker 1: I don't think they're messing around either. How is it
Speaker 1: we only get information on some crimes? And how does
Speaker 1: Hillary get away with all the crimes? The double standard
Speaker 1: is annoying? All right? Chris and Sussex, New Jersey. Chris,
Speaker 1: how are you? You're on the Sean Hannity Show. What's up?
Speaker 1: My friend? How are you, buddy? Listen? Being retired from
Speaker 1: law enforcement, I gathered some intelligence on James Colemey. You see,
Speaker 1: I happen to work in al in Dale, New Jersey,
Speaker 1: which is his hometown. And it was interesting because I
Speaker 1: came across the information that, being that the whole family
Speaker 1: is unusually tall, they took full advantage of what they
Speaker 1: call hight privilege by sitting in the front row at
Speaker 1: church and depriving people in the back to see the priest.
Speaker 1: And it was very um it was very unkind of
Speaker 1: them to do that. They could have sat anywhere, and
Speaker 1: a lot of people had bad things to say about
Speaker 1: James Collmey just for that reason. You know, the people
Speaker 1: that now are most critical to James call me and
Speaker 1: this whole, this whole witch hunt that I know or
Speaker 1: FBI people, and they feel like they're entire their entire
Speaker 1: life's work. I know you're cracking up at this guy
Speaker 1: talking about but Chris, you gotta say it again, it's historical.
Speaker 1: So people are because he's blocking the priest. Is that
Speaker 1: what's happening at your church? They can't even listen to
Speaker 1: the homily because he's blocking the view. He's blocking the view.
Speaker 1: This is exactly what he was doing. He knew full
Speaker 1: well what he was doing too. And people actually tried
Speaker 1: to get to church earlier to obtain the front row
Speaker 1: seats that he used to occupy by and it just
Speaker 1: it was closing dissension and the church. We know what
Speaker 1: the problem is. Comey has so many sins. He's got
Speaker 1: to get in there earlier. Jesus Christ can't get to
Speaker 1: them all. That's the problem. You're welcome, all right. I'm
Speaker 1: glad you two have a great little thing going on here.
Speaker 1: All right. Chris is in Atlanta News Talk WSP. Chris says,
Speaker 1: I'm lying. What am I lying about? It says let me?
Speaker 1: Can you hear me? I can hear your fine? Go ahead,
Speaker 1: let me let me tell you what you're lying about.
Speaker 1: You know the truth. There's the truth and has nothing
Speaker 1: to do with right or left. Let me let me
Speaker 1: tell you. All right, I asked you a question. Tell
Speaker 1: me where I'm lying, and stop wasting our time. Go ahead,
Speaker 1: I'm telling you the answer, all right. Whenever the cop,
Speaker 1: whenever a cop uh shoot and on our man, or
Speaker 1: something happens in the side of the cops involving always
Speaker 1: say don't rush to judgment. Judgment, all evidence come in. Okay,
Speaker 1: Now wait a minute, but this is a difference. We've
Speaker 1: now had over fourteen months, in some cases fifteen and
Speaker 1: sixteen months worth of investigations on this. Can you give
Speaker 1: me a single shred of evidence related to Trump Russia collusion? Anything?
Speaker 1: What is it? Investigation? Okay, So again I repeat, sixteen months.
Speaker 1: Look at what the country's being long on. Look at
Speaker 1: what the country is being put through. Now we're invading
Speaker 1: the homes of personal attorneys of the president in the
Speaker 1: United States, and the New York Times is writing about
Speaker 1: well Muller is investigating, uh, the access Hollywood tape, Stormy
Speaker 1: Daniels and Karen McDougall. Do you think there's any information
Speaker 1: about collusion with any of those people, any information about Russian?
Speaker 1: Answer you think Stormy Daniels has information about Russia collusion?
Speaker 1: If you'll let me answer, If you let what does
Speaker 1: Stormy have on Russia collusion? I am trying to answer.
Speaker 1: The Russia investigation is not over. Okay, Now you're a
Speaker 1: broken record. You've already said that. I'm asking you in
Speaker 1: fifteen months, sixteen months, we have nothing. As a matter
Speaker 1: of fact, let's don't take my word for let's listen
Speaker 1: to Democrats saying we have nothing. But Mr Clapper then
Speaker 1: went on to say that to his knowledge, there was
Speaker 1: no evidence of collusion between members of the Trump campaign
Speaker 1: and the Russians. We did not conclude any evidence in
Speaker 1: our report. And when I say our report, that is
Speaker 1: the n s, A, FBI, and CIA with my office
Speaker 1: the Director of National Intelligence, that had anything any reflection
Speaker 1: of collusion between the members of Trump campaign and the Russians.
Speaker 1: There was no evidence of that in our report. Was
Speaker 1: Mr Clapper wrong when he said that, I think he's
Speaker 1: right about characterizing the report which you all have read.
Speaker 1: We did not include any evidence in our report. And
Speaker 1: I say our that's n s, A, FBI, and CIA
Speaker 1: with my office of Director of Nation Intelligence that had
Speaker 1: anything that had any reflection of collusion between members of
Speaker 1: the Trump campaign and the Russians. There was no of
Speaker 1: that included in our Have you seen anything either intelligence briefings,
Speaker 1: through intelligence briefings, anything to back up any of the
Speaker 1: accusations that you have made. They have the documentation that
Speaker 1: they did the hacking. The hacking and on some of us,
Speaker 1: you know, put the collusion though illusion. We have not
Speaker 1: do you have evidence that there was in fact collusion
Speaker 1: between Trump associates and Russia during the campaign. Not at
Speaker 1: this time, have you seen anything that suggests any collusion
Speaker 1: between the Russians and the Trump campaign. Well, there's an
Speaker 1: awful lot of smoke there, let's put it that way.
Speaker 1: People that might have said they were involved, to what
Speaker 1: extent they were involved in, what extent the president might
Speaker 1: have known about these people or whatever. There's nothing there
Speaker 1: from that standpoint that we have seen directly linking our
Speaker 1: president to any of that. Did evidence exist of collusion, coordination,
Speaker 1: conspiracy between the Trump campaign and Russian state a ters
Speaker 1: at the time you learned of efforts. I don't know
Speaker 1: whether or not such collusion, that's your term, such collusion existed.
Speaker 1: I don't know. The big questions, of course, is is
Speaker 1: there any evidence of collusion you have seen yet? Is
Speaker 1: there There is a lot of smoke. We hadn't smoking
Speaker 1: gun at this point, but there is a lot of smoke.
Speaker 1: There's smoke, alright, I got I can go on forever, Chris,
Speaker 1: after sixteen months, So all right, now, my next question
Speaker 1: is those are democrats? And my next I have I
Speaker 1: have my next question. Tell me how Stormy Daniels is
Speaker 1: connected to Russia collusion. Go the Russia collusion investigation on
Speaker 1: Donald Trump. Okay you now, now you've said it ten times.
Speaker 1: Here's my question. How you said to me that Stormy
Speaker 1: Daniels is somehow related to Russia collusion? Tell me? How
Speaker 1: are I got to say? Goodbye? Okay, okay, you know
Speaker 1: what it is. You want? You want this. You're like
Speaker 1: the media. You want this to be. Who's so bad?
Speaker 1: You don't care what it's gonna take to get there.
Speaker 1: You don't care if you shread the Constitution. You don't care.
Speaker 1: You don't give a flying rip that that this now
Speaker 1: is occupying, literally tearing the country apart. You don't care
Speaker 1: what Greg Jared said about seizing a lawyer's files in
Speaker 1: an effort. Is that a total affront to the system
Speaker 1: of justice we have. It's extremely unprincipled. This is so
Speaker 1: far outside the scope of Mueller's investigation. You sound silly
Speaker 1: trying to defend that. So you know, at this point,
Speaker 1: I suspect this is all an effort to provoke the
Speaker 1: President into fighting against you know, the special counsel and
Speaker 1: maybe maybe firing him. Anyway, all right, give me, I'll
Speaker 1: give you one more chance, all right, do you have
Speaker 1: any evidence that Stormy as any Russia collusion knowledge the
Speaker 1: Russia investigation? Okay, I didn't lie. The Russia investigation is
Speaker 1: obviously not over, but it's gone into the weeds. And
Speaker 1: at the end of the day, I keep saying saying
Speaker 1: that this is well outside the mandate, and you're proving
Speaker 1: my point. You know, when the president, you know that
Speaker 1: this is the most conflicted and corrupt group of people
Speaker 1: we've ever seen. And that means Muller, that means Comy,
Speaker 1: that means Mr Trumps at crime Boss. He's a uh.
Speaker 1: I told him, I said, don't be like freddo be
Speaker 1: more like Michael. Michael's our guy, don Jr. I never
Speaker 1: wanted this for you. So when you know that's just
Speaker 1: the truth, anybody that is watching you have a right
Speaker 1: to be disgusted at what's going on here. It's not
Speaker 1: a crime to engage in contact to make somebody go away,
Speaker 1: or to have a contract with Stormy Daniels. You know,
Speaker 1: I will tell you that this is now gonna go
Speaker 1: on for years because I would never recommend that the
Speaker 1: President go anywhere near Mueller and Weissman and his merry
Speaker 1: band of Obama Hillary donors, people that have been excoriated
Speaker 1: by judges for withholding exculpatory evidence. People that have multiple
Speaker 1: times put innocent people in jail, people that have been
Speaker 1: overturned nine zero in the Supreme Court, people that have
Speaker 1: been held in judgments of over a hundred million dollars
Speaker 1: because of their behavior. Uh, people that lost tens of
Speaker 1: thousands of jobs because of there there's zealous overreach in
Speaker 1: past cases. That's the team that they put together, that's
Speaker 1: the Muller team, and they're doing the same thing that
Speaker 1: they've always done. Patterns of behavior repeat themselves, and that's
Speaker 1: what's happening alright. Eight nine one Shawn new Gingrich, he's livid,
Speaker 1: apoplectic over what happened with Michael Cohen's office. This is
Speaker 1: pretty amazing. Alan Dershowitz, So he said to me in
Speaker 1: last Night and Tonight that Robert Mueller's Stormy Daniels swat
Speaker 1: team had rated the offices of a lawyer who worked
Speaker 1: for a Democratic president of the the a c l U
Speaker 1: would be on every network raising Hell, well, not only
Speaker 1: is the a c l U not complaining about the
Speaker 1: rate on my Cocoin's office, they're defending it, which is
Speaker 1: what I've always known, is that the a c l
Speaker 1: U is conflicted out on all things liberal. Anyway, the
Speaker 1: American Civil Liberties Union published a you know, pretty bizarre
Speaker 1: opinion piece by their legal director, you know, and defending
Speaker 1: the FBI raid, of course, because it's anti Trump. The
Speaker 1: five forces against Trump I've been warning about the media,
Speaker 1: the Democratic Party, weak Republicans, never Trumpers, and of course
Speaker 1: the infamous deep state. I think now people understand what
Speaker 1: I've been talking about, all right, New King Rich is
Speaker 1: apoplectic about it. He's next. It's eight hundred nine four one, Shawn,
Speaker 1: if you want to be a part of the program
Speaker 1: and joining us now. And some pretty strong words that
Speaker 1: I read former Speaker of the House New Gingridge on
Speaker 1: this raid of the president's personal attorneys, home, hotel room,
Speaker 1: and his offices. How are you, sir, well, I'm doing well,
Speaker 1: and I listen. Meant every single strong word that I said,
Speaker 1: particularly when you go all the way back to Paul
Speaker 1: Maniford and his wife in their pajamas at three o'clock
Speaker 1: in the morning, waking up to have the door broken
Speaker 1: in by folks who turn out to be the U. S. Government.
Speaker 1: I mean this, this is this is the behavior of
Speaker 1: a police state, not the behavior of a free country. Well,
Speaker 1: let's start with where this now has gone. Um if
Speaker 1: I think you're still in Europe, but um, and you
Speaker 1: probably haven't seen Maggie Haberman and companies big report in
Speaker 1: the New York Times at the rate on Trump's lawyers
Speaker 1: sought records on the Access Hollywood tape. This on top
Speaker 1: of now Stormy Daniels is now apparently a witness for
Speaker 1: the Special Counsel in the prosecution and cooperating along with
Speaker 1: Karen McDougall. I thought this was about Trump Russia collusion,
Speaker 1: and I don't see. Let me let me be blunt
Speaker 1: here for a second. This is about Rob Rosenstein totally
Speaker 1: completely failing to do his job. Failing. Uh, there's no
Speaker 1: grounds for an independent council looking into Russia to turn
Speaker 1: around and decide, oh, he has the right to look
Speaker 1: into everything that There's an old Stalin quote of the
Speaker 1: KGB agent who said, you show me the man, I'll
Speaker 1: find you the crime. Well, that's the opposite of the
Speaker 1: rule of law. And what we're watching right now is
Speaker 1: a group of left wing lawyers in a department which
Speaker 1: gave nine of his campaign donations to Hillary Clinton. Uh,
Speaker 1: who have gone after President Trump and everybody near him
Speaker 1: in a way which just contrasted with how much they
Speaker 1: protected Hillary Clinton and everyone near her. And any reasonable
Speaker 1: American understands that the very concept of the rule of
Speaker 1: law is under threat now, and it's under threat from
Speaker 1: the Justice Department, which is out of control and which
Speaker 1: has refused to turn over documents for four months to
Speaker 1: the Congress, has yet to release a report that was
Speaker 1: due in February about the number two guy in Justice
Speaker 1: who has fired McNabb, has failed to release the document
Speaker 1: that was due in um in March about Comey, who's
Speaker 1: about to go off on a self aggrandizing, self serving
Speaker 1: book tour. By the way, you know today we're supposed
Speaker 1: to be reasonable and call me is calling Trump a
Speaker 1: mob boss? Did you hear about that? I did hear
Speaker 1: about that, and I think it just didn't Let's be
Speaker 1: let's be really clear here. Comey is a self serving
Speaker 1: person who we now know and this is a real
Speaker 1: surprise to me when I read it yesterday. We now
Speaker 1: know in nineteen In two thousand and seven, collaborated with
Speaker 1: Chuck Schumer to deliberately embarrassed George W. Bush, who had
Speaker 1: appointed Comy, and and the National View had an article which,
Speaker 1: step by step took apart any plausible excuse for believing
Speaker 1: that Comey is a serious citizen trying to do his
Speaker 1: job and really outline in a case for which he
Speaker 1: is somebody who is consistently manipulate, laded his way, and
Speaker 1: and focused on his own self aggrandizement. Uh. And I
Speaker 1: think this this kind of stuff. By the way, I
Speaker 1: will say everywer that Craig Shirley has written a stunning
Speaker 1: article on the case of of the Justice Department deep
Speaker 1: state versus Conservatives, going back to Reagan and then to
Speaker 1: Bush one, and then to Bush too. Uh And and
Speaker 1: you go through step by step by step, And you
Speaker 1: mean to realize that there's this continual pattern of the
Speaker 1: left wing civil servants doing everything they can to undermine
Speaker 1: and cripple conservatives. Do you have any doubt now that
Speaker 1: this is an effort to overthrow a duly elected president. No,
Speaker 1: I think. I think what you're seeing is an effort
Speaker 1: to have a judicial coup data by a group of
Speaker 1: people who are so deeply bitterly opposed to the president
Speaker 1: that they will do anything to get him and by
Speaker 1: an elite news meet, which is equally deeply opposed to President.
Speaker 1: I talked to Silver reporters today, and every time I
Speaker 1: would say to them, show me one time when someone
Speaker 1: close to Hillary Clinton had their home broken in the
Speaker 1: three in the morning, Show me one time when we've
Speaker 1: had the kind of intense persecution that we're getting here
Speaker 1: and you can't find it. It doesn't exist. People were
Speaker 1: protected over and over. Here's what we we do know
Speaker 1: is that we know that Hillary violated eighteen USC. Seven
Speaker 1: ninety three. She misshandled classified, top secret special access programming
Speaker 1: information when she put it on that mom and pop
Speaker 1: shop server in a bathroom closet. We know that if
Speaker 1: if new ging Rich ever deleted thirty three thousand subpoena
Speaker 1: at email and acid washes hard drive with bleach bid
Speaker 1: and beat up his devices where these emails may have
Speaker 1: gone to h meaning blackberries and iPhones, that you would
Speaker 1: be arrested for obstructing justice. Uh, but it was called
Speaker 1: But but then you've got this the same players here,
Speaker 1: You've got Comey. Now, look at Comey. He's the guy
Speaker 1: that told Donald Trump that the dossier was unverified and salacious.
Speaker 1: In January. But in October sixteen, they had no problem
Speaker 1: using that salacious, unverified dossier as the bulk of information
Speaker 1: to get a FISA warrant to spy on a Trump
Speaker 1: campaign associate. And now we see that they were able
Speaker 1: to get inside the Trump campaign back door. Now they're
Speaker 1: getting into Trump's businesses back door by doing this raid,
Speaker 1: as Alan Dersho had said, a violation of Michael Cohen's
Speaker 1: constitutional rights, and now they'll have access to everything Trump
Speaker 1: at this point, well, and and then I plant asty
Speaker 1: for a second, and I thought dershy was last night
Speaker 1: on your show was just brilliant, And I thought you
Speaker 1: were doing the country a real service by learning a
Speaker 1: man of that stature, that background. As a Hartvard law professor,
Speaker 1: layout I got this is not somebody do you think
Speaker 1: that normally as pro Trump, But he does believe in
Speaker 1: the constitution, he does believe in the rule of law.
Speaker 1: In at least point half, there's a general principle, at
Speaker 1: least an Autobos reid that if the process of getting
Speaker 1: the evidence is tainted, the evidence is inadmissible. Well, there
Speaker 1: were no grounds for Moller to be getting any kind
Speaker 1: of evidence on the topics for which they're going after Cohen.
Speaker 1: So when he turns over this information, what's the legitimate
Speaker 1: ground for this? When? Why? Why is he allowed to
Speaker 1: do this? Yeah, we're told they'll have a taint team principle.
Speaker 1: You know, I've been trying to warn people. Everybody if
Speaker 1: you remember when Comey was appointed, you know, nearly a
Speaker 1: year ago. Now, everybody is such a good guy. And
Speaker 1: then I look at the team that he put together,
Speaker 1: all Clinton, Hillary Obama donors and his pit bull with
Speaker 1: The New York Times describes Robert Mueller's pit bull a
Speaker 1: guy by the name of Andrew Weissman. And I've been
Speaker 1: talking about, Oh, this is the guy that costs tens
Speaker 1: of thousands of Americans their job because he was over
Speaker 1: zealous in the end Ron case Anderson Accounting case. Tens
Speaker 1: of thousands of people lost their job. He lost in
Speaker 1: the Supreme Court was over turn nine zero. He put
Speaker 1: four merrial executives in jail for a year that was
Speaker 1: overturned by the Fifth Circuit Circuit. He's been excoriated by
Speaker 1: judges for withholding exculpatory evidence. And Robert Mueller when he
Speaker 1: was working in Boston and his team was working with
Speaker 1: a confidential FBI informant close to Whitey Bulger. Whitey Bulger
Speaker 1: was committing murders. Four innocent people went to jail in
Speaker 1: that case. Two of them died in jail. They were
Speaker 1: found innocent and over a hundred million dollars paid later.
Speaker 1: And again we're dealing with exculpatory evidence withheld. So I'm looking.
Speaker 1: I kept saying, anybody to listen, I don't trust Muller.
Speaker 1: He's not the man beyond reproach that everybody said, look
Speaker 1: at the team he hired. Why would you ever hire
Speaker 1: Andrew Weissman to be a janitor at this point with
Speaker 1: anything to do with the law. Well, I have to
Speaker 1: confess that has often happened. You were ahead of me
Speaker 1: when Mona was first appointed. I tweeted that I thought,
Speaker 1: given his reputation, people should you know, relax and given
Speaker 1: the benefit of doubt. And then like you, uh, as
Speaker 1: I watched he was hiring, I just thought, this is crazy,
Speaker 1: that this this verge is on insane. I don't think
Speaker 1: he has a single pro Trump lawyer on his entire team.
Speaker 1: He doesn't now if if if you know, if Comey
Speaker 1: had put together and invested investigatory group on Hillary Clinton,
Speaker 1: that had only hardline conservative Republicans, the left would have
Speaker 1: gone crazy, and the Times would have gone crazy, CBS
Speaker 1: News would have gone crazy. But we're watching what as
Speaker 1: I think, I mean, the president's right to say to
Speaker 1: which hunt this this president who is in the middle
Speaker 1: of achieving extraordinary things. The lowest unemployment rate maybe in
Speaker 1: over a generation, the Chinese beginning to back down on
Speaker 1: trade violations, the North Koreans offering to to negotiate on
Speaker 1: nuclear weapons, huge amount of deregulation. Conservative judges attack sets
Speaker 1: that are fueling economic growth, the lowest black unemployment rate.
Speaker 1: I think maybe in American history, you and I are
Speaker 1: the only two people in America to ever talk about
Speaker 1: it besides the President. What do you think of market, Well,
Speaker 1: nobody cares. Obviously in the media, they don't say one
Speaker 1: good thing about the president. They're they're all they're all
Speaker 1: locked into this obsessive, compulsive hatred that they have for
Speaker 1: the president. What about Mark Meadows and Jim Jordan's They're
Speaker 1: now saying that sessions in Rosenstein will be held in
Speaker 1: contempt if they don't hand over documents, and Race should
Speaker 1: be impeached. What do you think, Well, I think, first
Speaker 1: of all, they absolutely are right to hold them in contempt.
Speaker 1: And I noticed that we also had Chairman nonez uh say,
Speaker 1: I think yesterday that he was moving towards thinking they
Speaker 1: should be impeached. Uh. And look, I think you people
Speaker 1: need to ask a simple question. What is it that
Speaker 1: the Justice Department has learned that is so terrible that
Speaker 1: it has to be covered up? And why is it
Speaker 1: that for four months? Is it because of bureaucracy, slow
Speaker 1: and stupid? It's because they know there's so much bad
Speaker 1: stuff in these documents that they're desperate to avoid release him.
Speaker 1: And and uh, you know, I think I think this
Speaker 1: is a huge deal. Um. You know, as you know,
Speaker 1: I've done a course on defending America, and of course
Speaker 1: I have an entire section of the rule of law,
Speaker 1: and I cannot overstay for our audience. If we lose
Speaker 1: the ability to have a genuine rule of law and
Speaker 1: we degenerate like Venezuela into a country where we have
Speaker 1: the rule of personalities, we have lost everything that we
Speaker 1: once thought America was totally agree with that statement. Now
Speaker 1: I guess the question is, well, the president can't trust
Speaker 1: Robert Mueller. He can't sit down and talk with this guy.
Speaker 1: They've been duplicitors in their negotiations. So the only option
Speaker 1: I see for the president is to hire the best
Speaker 1: lawyers and fight like hell and use the bully pulpit
Speaker 1: that he has to combat this. If he fires Mueller,
Speaker 1: then God only knows what's going to happen in the country. Yeah,
Speaker 1: I think that would split the Republican Party and lead
Speaker 1: the chaos. I am. I'm opposed to Farenweller, but I
Speaker 1: think there are things the president to do that are
Speaker 1: much more clever than what he's been doing. First of all,
Speaker 1: his lawyers that have sent a simple letter and all
Speaker 1: of that says, you know, we're very willing to consider
Speaker 1: having an interview. Tell us what crimes you're investigating? What what?
Speaker 1: What is this interview about? What? We Apparently, up until
Speaker 1: the I heard just before the rate of Michael Cohen
Speaker 1: that that's what they were all doing, that the president
Speaker 1: was cooperative. They've never evoked executive privilege at any point.
Speaker 1: They've handed over millions of documents. I understand it. And
Speaker 1: apparently there's no good will here on the other side.
Speaker 1: This is a now witch hunt. Of course there's not.
Speaker 1: The other side is a lynch mom designed to destroy
Speaker 1: the president. But I think there's a very powerful question
Speaker 1: to ask more, what's the crime you're investigating? What what
Speaker 1: what is it you want to talk to the president?
Speaker 1: What to tell us in advance? What is it you
Speaker 1: think as a crime here? Because Muller had a very
Speaker 1: specific instruction, you're supposed to look into Russia and in
Speaker 1: the weather or not this Russian collusion. And then idiotically
Speaker 1: Rosenstein or maybe deliberately, willfully and cleverly Rosenstein added a
Speaker 1: little clause that says, in any other matter that you
Speaker 1: come across, ye, all right, stay right there. I have
Speaker 1: a prosecutor who can who can look at everything in
Speaker 1: your entire life to find out whether there isn't something
Speaker 1: that they can get you on. That is the end
Speaker 1: of a free society. Former Speaker of the House, Now,
Speaker 1: King rich Um, I'll put this all in one last question. Now,
Speaker 1: going forward, knowing what we know, what should the president do?
Speaker 1: Ryan is now out as Speaker at the end of
Speaker 1: the year. What what should the Republican Party be doing?
Speaker 1: In your view? Well, those are two very different questions.
Speaker 1: But let me just say first of all that everybody
Speaker 1: on the Republican side, starting with the President, should systematically
Speaker 1: really work on this whole issue of Justice Department corruption,
Speaker 1: Justice Department cover up, Justice Department being out of control
Speaker 1: and being breaking the law. Because if we win that
Speaker 1: argument by September, if it's clear that the problem wasn't
Speaker 1: Donald J. Trump, the problem was a sick institution who
Speaker 1: save many of its money to Hillary Clinton, which was
Speaker 1: consistently protecting Clinton and consistently doing things that were inappropriate
Speaker 1: to the president. Nined states, I think we were not.
Speaker 1: We are dramatically stronger in September and October. And then second,
Speaker 1: I think that that Kevin McCarthy and Steves Police and
Speaker 1: the others who are going to pick up the banner
Speaker 1: with Paul Ryan's re chairman, they need to work with
Speaker 1: the President and with the center Republicans, And we need
Speaker 1: to have a sixty ninety day campaign starting in probably
Speaker 1: middle August that draws a vivid, sharp contrast between who
Speaker 1: we are and who the left is. Uh, just just
Speaker 1: take the economic growth we should be in every African
Speaker 1: American community every day pointing out this is the lowest
Speaker 1: black unemployment in history. Isn't that a good thing? Wouldn't
Speaker 1: you like that a party that actually brought you jobs
Speaker 1: instead of the party that brought you food stamps. When
Speaker 1: we got to have the guests to go to every
Speaker 1: American win the campaign. You you will remember when I
Speaker 1: first ran, the year I finally won, I was behind
Speaker 1: seven in September. When George W. Bush ran as vice president,
Speaker 1: he was behind by nineteen points in May and one
Speaker 1: by eight points in October or November, which means one
Speaker 1: and every four Americans switched their position. Campaign's matter, and
Speaker 1: we can't wage a six or eight month campaign. There's
Speaker 1: the elite media hates us so much and they're going
Speaker 1: to distort an attack everything we're doing so strongly, but
Speaker 1: we just need to tee up about a sixty to
Speaker 1: nine day campaign. And you'll remember, because you were there.
Speaker 1: We did not launch the contract with America until mid
Speaker 1: September because we knew if we can launched it too
Speaker 1: early that the New York Times and others would destroy it.
Speaker 1: So I think good advice. I think we can win
Speaker 1: the campaign. Alright till the top of the hour nine
Speaker 1: for one, Shawn told free telephone number, you want to
Speaker 1: be a part of the program. Now. We're also watching
Speaker 1: other stories today like oh okay, the President tweeting out,
Speaker 1: Uh that yeah we've got new weapons, and yeah it's
Speaker 1: coming and Syria is gonna be punished for what they
Speaker 1: did to innocent men, women and children. Uh. A lot
Speaker 1: of the propaganda coming out of Russia has been, well,
Speaker 1: this has got to be the rebels, and we had
Speaker 1: a lot of people on last night that countered that saying, well,
Speaker 1: number one, they don't have the means to deliver those weapons,
Speaker 1: and nobody was even certain that they even had access
Speaker 1: to the weapons. And meanwhile, assad has a history of
Speaker 1: using the weapons. Anyway, what are military options? What's likely
Speaker 1: to happen? Here? We have Dr Sebastian Gorkas with us,
Speaker 1: and also Scott Julinger is a congressional candidate for the
Speaker 1: ninth district in Pennsylvania. Retired CIA operative and Russian intel
Speaker 1: operations z ex perty knows a thing or two about
Speaker 1: Russian lies and propaganda. And welcome both of you to
Speaker 1: the program. And I'll begin with you Scott. Apparently you
Speaker 1: speak Russian, you worked in the CIA all these years,
Speaker 1: and UH also understand how the Russians work. Uh. Is
Speaker 1: Vladimir Putin lying on behalf of Syrian dictator Assan? I think,
Speaker 1: I think it's highly likely. First of all, we already
Speaker 1: basically with the use of the chemical weapons. We know
Speaker 1: that his promise to President Obama in to help the
Speaker 1: Syrians get rid of their chemical weapons obviously didn't didn't work.
Speaker 1: It was yet another Russian lie. And so now he's
Speaker 1: threatening to take down some of our Tomahawk missiles should
Speaker 1: we decided to launch a strike. So, really, Vladimir Prutin
Speaker 1: is just showing a typical Russian resolve and an ability
Speaker 1: to try to hit above his weight. But really Russia
Speaker 1: is not in the driver's seat in this situation, all right.
Speaker 1: So the question is, would the rebels have even the
Speaker 1: means to, or the weapons and the means to deliver
Speaker 1: those weapons, to launch chemical weapons on innocent men, women,
Speaker 1: and children, or if you were to give a percentage
Speaker 1: of certainty, what are the odds that, in fact it
Speaker 1: was a sadds regime. I think it's extremely unlikely that
Speaker 1: any rebel forces, as as much in disarray as they
Speaker 1: are would be able to remotely be able to deploy
Speaker 1: such weapons. It just it just doesn't seem possible at all.
Speaker 1: And we have, as you said, we have as odds
Speaker 1: history of using them before and um So, it's it's highly,
Speaker 1: highly unlikely that the rebels are responsible for anything like this,
Speaker 1: And it's typical Russian disinformation to constantly throw out other
Speaker 1: narratives to kind of disrupt the story. They did this
Speaker 1: before during the shootdown of the Malaysian airline over Ukraine.
Speaker 1: And this is something taken from their standard playbook of
Speaker 1: putting out disinformation to confuse the West. Yeah, Dr Gorka,
Speaker 1: let me go to you and ask you very simply,
Speaker 1: what about Moscow's vow to shoot down any missiles that
Speaker 1: the US fires? Would vladimirn't be that stupid, No, he wouldn't. Uh.
Speaker 1: Their paper tiger. If you look at the money that
Speaker 1: they spend on defense, if you look at the size
Speaker 1: of their GDP, they are literally a shadow of their
Speaker 1: former selves in the Soviet Union. The last thing they
Speaker 1: try to convince us that they have a supermissile system,
Speaker 1: what did they used to convince us? A video and
Speaker 1: it's almost a decade old, with a cheap animation that's
Speaker 1: been on YouTube for at least six years. Uh, It's
Speaker 1: it's a lot of propaganda, misinformation. They may try to
Speaker 1: do something, but it will be a pathetic attempt at
Speaker 1: comparison to our capabilities. Here's the president's comments. Dr Gorkery said,
Speaker 1: so much fake news about what's going on in the
Speaker 1: White House. We're being very calm, calculated and a big
Speaker 1: focus on open and fair trade with China, the coming
Speaker 1: North Korea meeting, and of course the vicious gas attacks
Speaker 1: in Syria. Feels great to have John Bolton and Larry
Speaker 1: Cutlow on board. We're doing things that nobody thought was possible,
Speaker 1: despite the never ending and Russia investigation, which takes tremendous
Speaker 1: time and focus, no collusion, no obstruction other than I
Speaker 1: fight back. And so now they do the unthinkable raid
Speaker 1: the offices of my lawyer for information, which is bad.
Speaker 1: And then he says Russia vows to shoot down any
Speaker 1: and all missiles fired at Syria. He says, get ready Russia,
Speaker 1: because they'll becoming nice, new smart and you shouldn't be
Speaker 1: partners with a gas killing animal who kills people and
Speaker 1: enjoys it. And he said, our relationship with Russia is
Speaker 1: now worse than it's ever been, and that includes the
Speaker 1: Cold War. There's no reason for this. Russia needs to
Speaker 1: help with their needs, help with their economy, something that
Speaker 1: would be very easy to do, and we need all
Speaker 1: nations to work together stop the arms race. And then
Speaker 1: the last thing he said is, you know, there's so
Speaker 1: much bad blood with Russia caused by the fake and
Speaker 1: corrupt Russia investigation headed up by all the Democratic loyalists
Speaker 1: or people that work for Obama. Muller is most conflicted
Speaker 1: of all except Rosenstein, who signed the feisen Komi letter
Speaker 1: no collusion. They go crazy, What do you make a
Speaker 1: ball that he's tying it all in together. I think
Speaker 1: that's part with the most important thing. And I really hope,
Speaker 1: you know, we can pick this up and run with
Speaker 1: this on our side, on the good guys. Um, So,
Speaker 1: we are potentially in a situation where America is going
Speaker 1: to take military action because of this chemical weapons attack,
Speaker 1: and Russia says they're going to shoot down our missiles.
Speaker 1: What does that do for the Russia collusion? That if Sean,
Speaker 1: it's a great point. What does it do answer your
Speaker 1: own question? Right? It just kills it well. But he's
Speaker 1: already proven that because he's taken all these But so
Speaker 1: Mueller should resign today if we have the Russian government
Speaker 1: saying they're going to take military action against the president
Speaker 1: of the United States, response to that attack, then there
Speaker 1: can be no Russian collusion. So that's number one. Number two,
Speaker 1: he's absolutely right in what he's saying. Just look at
Speaker 1: the fact of who's on the team with John Bolton,
Speaker 1: with Pompeo still at c i A, with UH General
Speaker 1: Maddis now Secretary Madis at Defense, with General Dunford, Chief
Speaker 1: of chaing with the joint chiefs. We have the a
Speaker 1: team that literally how to imagine a better team to
Speaker 1: deal with this crisis. So America is in good hands
Speaker 1: and assad Putin Iran they're going to be having some
Speaker 1: sleepless nights. I can assure you that short. Let's say
Speaker 1: it's probably happening even as we speak, Scott, let me
Speaker 1: go back to you, and let's go back to Putin.
Speaker 1: Why would Vladimir Putin well really throw his surrogue its
Speaker 1: more than Putin himself Moscow vowing to shoot down any
Speaker 1: missiles that are fired. Why would they be defending the
Speaker 1: use of chemical weapons against innocent men, women and children?
Speaker 1: And what does it mean? And do you think Putin
Speaker 1: would be capable of at least attempting to shoot out
Speaker 1: of the sky at American missile I think that you
Speaker 1: know Putin is sort have backed himself into a coiner
Speaker 1: with all of his threats and in over the past
Speaker 1: several years, the West, until President Trump came along, the
Speaker 1: West was basically buying into his game at this point.
Speaker 1: Now he's out issuing empty threats to basically maintain some
Speaker 1: credibility in front of his Syrian allies. Now he's probably
Speaker 1: he's gonna be coming up short this time because you know,
Speaker 1: his his anti aircraft missile systems are going to have
Speaker 1: may take down some Tomahawks, but they're really at best,
Speaker 1: but they're not going to be able to blunt an
Speaker 1: American attack. And plus you have the British and the
Speaker 1: French possibly responding as well. So Russia is just doubling
Speaker 1: down on it's becoming a pariah in the international community.
Speaker 1: You know, they just had the diplomatic um um expulsions
Speaker 1: of their diplomats worldwide, and so Russia is really having
Speaker 1: a hard time with his credibility on the world stage
Speaker 1: right now. All right, So then what does Putin really do?
Speaker 1: I mean, because Putin's economy isn't a bit of a
Speaker 1: shambles now and and their number one of the basis
Speaker 1: of their economy is pretty much energy, and with America
Speaker 1: now moving towards energy and the pen oh, that's gonna
Speaker 1: help not only the United States, but it's also probably
Speaker 1: over time gonna wean Western Europe off their dependency of Putin.
Speaker 1: If he ever went rogue and shut down, they are
Speaker 1: turned off the spickets to Western Europe. Right. I think
Speaker 1: Putin will continue to sound off very loudly, but over
Speaker 1: time you're going to see as he continues to run
Speaker 1: up against the President's resolved, he's going to start toning
Speaker 1: down his rhetoric. And then I wouldn't be surprised if
Speaker 1: several months from now then they start putting out some
Speaker 1: feelers or maybe slowly disengaging themselves from the Syrian regime.
Speaker 1: Perhaps he can't overtly do it because that would be
Speaker 1: admitting defeat and that would be a major blow to
Speaker 1: Russian prestige, but I can see him doing that slowly
Speaker 1: on the behind, on the back lines, you know, you know,
Speaker 1: secret lines of communication and all, as he continues to
Speaker 1: be outflanked by the Trump administration. Yeah, um, you know,
Speaker 1: I I gotta say this. I mean, look at China
Speaker 1: blinking for example, I mean, nobody pays attention China on
Speaker 1: intellectual property, China on on imports of automobiles and and
Speaker 1: so on, and tariffs and so many other issues. The
Speaker 1: President of China basically gives into the president's demand. Everyone
Speaker 1: was predicting, Oh, China is uh to. China is never
Speaker 1: going to give in to the president. This is going
Speaker 1: to start a trade ward. Well, it's not a trade war.
Speaker 1: We're gonna get better, free or fairer trade. Dr Gorka.
Speaker 1: It's really quite stunning if you think about the fact
Speaker 1: that this is a man who just a week ago
Speaker 1: voted himself president for life. So he really is, you know,
Speaker 1: the new communist emperor of Chinists. But as you said,
Speaker 1: he blinked, He blinked three times, and instead of a
Speaker 1: trade well, what we have is China understanding that there
Speaker 1: has been a global reset, not not a badly translated,
Speaker 1: translated plastic button Hillary Lives gives the Kremlin, but a
Speaker 1: true global reset when the President announced that we are
Speaker 1: going to have fair trade and we're not going to
Speaker 1: continue business as usual in ways that Latin nations like
Speaker 1: Signer that suppressed the value of their currency, that used
Speaker 1: underhand means exploit their membership of the w T O
Speaker 1: that is not going to be allowed to undermine national
Speaker 1: interests and to steal the jobs in the intellectual property
Speaker 1: from the United States. So it's it's just the first
Speaker 1: sign of surrender that the plan of the president to
Speaker 1: reset the global economic system is already working. Short. Yeah,
Speaker 1: so it seems like, now, let me go back to
Speaker 1: your expertise. Guard in your time in the CIA and
Speaker 1: with Russia. I know that Devin Noon has warned President
Speaker 1: Obama at the time in hey, Russia has in the
Speaker 1: past they have tried to create chaos and so discord
Speaker 1: in the country when it comes to our elections. He
Speaker 1: warned specifically about Uh, then we had the d n
Speaker 1: C hack that took place. Um, but I wouldn't begin
Speaker 1: to tell anybody where all that information came from. When
Speaker 1: I interviewed Wiki Leagues founder Julian Assans, he said it
Speaker 1: wasn't Russia, it was no state party. But you know,
Speaker 1: with Hillary Clinton's email server, you know on this mom
Speaker 1: in this mom and pop shop bathroom closet, isn't it
Speaker 1: likely that Russia, China, North Korea, Iran and other hostile
Speaker 1: actors that they all had access to everything in there.
Speaker 1: There's no there is no question at all that that
Speaker 1: absolutely happened. You have to remember, I mean these countries
Speaker 1: regularly assault are classified email systems that state dot gov,
Speaker 1: you know, the State Department, or c I or n SCA.
Speaker 1: They're constantly hacking into very secure networks. So the idea,
Speaker 1: the concept that Hillary Clinton's private bathroom server would not
Speaker 1: have been penetrated by at least half a dozen Intel
Speaker 1: services is laughable. If Apple James Comey and his original
Speaker 1: exoneration letter before he took it out, had in there
Speaker 1: that foreign entities had hacked into her server and then
Speaker 1: protecting her and not prosecuting her. Part of it was
Speaker 1: that he took that out exactly. And and and one
Speaker 1: thing you remember, as you said many times, Seawan, you
Speaker 1: the hard working line officers in the FBI and the CIA,
Speaker 1: in the n s A trust me, they are outraged
Speaker 1: at this type of you know, uh bifurcated law. You know,
Speaker 1: one set of laws for the for the regular people
Speaker 1: like us, and another set of laws for the higher ups.
Speaker 1: I mean, we all have the same clearance. We all
Speaker 1: had the same clearances. And I've known people who were
Speaker 1: severely punished for violations that were one iota of what
Speaker 1: Hillary Clinton has been guilty of and many other people
Speaker 1: in the Obama administration and the rank and file, hardworking people.
Speaker 1: Now they're furious. Community are outraged. One of the reasons
Speaker 1: we're learning so much about the deep state and and
Speaker 1: the abuse of power is because of the good people
Speaker 1: that work in the FBI and the intel community. All Right,
Speaker 1: morand Scott Yulinger when we come back. Also Dr Sebastian Gorka,
Speaker 1: when we get back. Eight one Sean is our toll
Speaker 1: free telephone number. Sarah Carter David Show will be joining
Speaker 1: us coming up at the top of the next hour,
Speaker 1: and your calls as we continue. Glad your willis right.
Speaker 1: As we continue with Fox News contribut the Dr. Sebastian Gorker,
Speaker 1: Scott Uhlinger, by the way, who is a candidate for
Speaker 1: the ninth Congressional district in Pennsylvania. Former CIA or retired
Speaker 1: CIA operative. How many years were you in the CIA
Speaker 1: UM It was a total of sixteen seawan and I
Speaker 1: had some military time as well. So I had a
Speaker 1: full career at the CIA, and I retired from there
Speaker 1: as a station chief. Yeah, and so what can you
Speaker 1: tell us in terms of Russia, because Russia Russia. Russia.
Speaker 1: I don't know how the Muller investigation went from Russian collusion,
Speaker 1: how they ignored Hillary paying for Russian government lies to
Speaker 1: influence the election, and then that phony dossier that was
Speaker 1: put together by a foreign national, Christopher Steele, that got
Speaker 1: the Russian lies then presented before as a cord A
Speaker 1: hold different issue. But what can you tell us about
Speaker 1: the mindset we keep hearing about? You know, all of
Speaker 1: all of these you know, I T hackings and robots
Speaker 1: and discord that has been sown by Russia. How long
Speaker 1: has this been going on? Russia has been attempting to
Speaker 1: influence elections worldwide for many, many years. However, know their efforts,
Speaker 1: their efforts in this past election were relatively pitiful. It's
Speaker 1: just that the Democrats, because of their crushing defeat, they
Speaker 1: seek to hang blame for the entire election on this
Speaker 1: Russian on this Russian interference, which has always existed and
Speaker 1: there's always been a very minor part of our elections history.
Speaker 1: So it's just it's just another false narrative that the
Speaker 1: Democrats like to put out. All right, you guys are
Speaker 1: doing some events together real quick. I'll give you, you know,
Speaker 1: twenty seconds Dr Gorka, tell us what you guys are
Speaker 1: up to. Yeah, so you know, for full disclosure, I'm
Speaker 1: endorsing several candidates around the country, from Kelly Ward to
Speaker 1: Scott individuals that I really see following the make America
Speaker 1: Great Again agenda. And I was very very delighted to
Speaker 1: what was it, Scott ten days ago give my foot
Speaker 1: indorsement to his campaign and I'll be traveling to Pennsylvania
Speaker 1: to spread that message of make America great again. Well,
Speaker 1: I share your endorsement, and Scott you have mine as well,
Speaker 1: unless it hurts you, then I'll pull it back. Okay, no, no,
Speaker 1: thank you. Mun joined the voters, the voters in where
Speaker 1: I live in Pennsylvania, the ninth District, are very conservative folks, Seawan,
Speaker 1: and believe me, uh, there's a lot of people listening
Speaker 1: in right now who are big fans. All right, thanks
Speaker 1: so much, guys. Well listen, we're gonna follow your campaign
Speaker 1: throughout and we wish you all the best. Hey, right
Speaker 1: here for our final news round up and information overload
Speaker 1: in the final hour of the Sean Hannity Show. Well,
Speaker 1: I can just tell you that we're not going to
Speaker 1: just holding contempt. We will have a plan to holding
Speaker 1: contempt and to impeach, to impeach Christopher A. Absolutely, but
Speaker 1: there is no discussions, not last week out, the week
Speaker 1: before that, and not even yesterday about firing Rosenstein. You know, really,
Speaker 1: at this particular point, I think that it's members of
Speaker 1: Congress who have a bigger problem with Rod Rosenstein myself
Speaker 1: included that he's not giving us the documents and he's
Speaker 1: not doing his job. And if he's not going to
Speaker 1: do the job, he needs to go and find one
Speaker 1: that he will do. And so the frustration with the
Speaker 1: a G and the Deputy a G is probably more
Speaker 1: a focus of Congress, uh and it it probably makes
Speaker 1: the president's dissatisfaction paleing. Should adventure you guys hold them
Speaker 1: in contempt absolutely, I think at this particular point they
Speaker 1: have not complied with a subpoena, they should be held
Speaker 1: in contempt. And if they can't get it right, you know,
Speaker 1: here we are. It's interesting here we are today and
Speaker 1: I met with the new person that they have at
Speaker 1: d o J. They can't tell us how many documents
Speaker 1: that are going to deliver, when they're going to deliver it,
Speaker 1: how they redact you Those are three questions that they've
Speaker 1: had five months to answer and they can't answer it.
Speaker 1: It's appalling. But last night's impeaching Christopher Ray is that's
Speaker 1: something that's certainly that's that's in the toolbox, and at
Speaker 1: this particular point, hopefully they will comply long before we
Speaker 1: have to go that route. But it's in the in
Speaker 1: the toolbox that we have. They're certainly contempt of Congress
Speaker 1: is the first step. This rate of the president's private
Speaker 1: attorney and his office and his home and as he
Speaker 1: was staying in a hotel. I guess because of construction
Speaker 1: that you say violated the constitutional rights. Professor, Well, you
Speaker 1: can't just go and sweep up all lawyer client privileged
Speaker 1: information and then give it over to some FBI agent
Speaker 1: or a low ranking um U S attorney and say
Speaker 1: we'll go through it and the stuff that isn't privileged
Speaker 1: turn over to the prosecutors. The stuff that is privileged,
Speaker 1: well you can read it and you can study it,
Speaker 1: but you can't give it the prosecutors. The fourth and
Speaker 1: sixth Amendment don't just protect against use of evidence in
Speaker 1: a criminal trial, they protect privacy. Imagine if instead of
Speaker 1: going into layal client privilege, they tape recorded a person's
Speaker 1: confession to his priest or rabbi, or went into somebody's
Speaker 1: home and recorded conversations with his wife, or conversations between
Speaker 1: a doctor and a patient. The lawyer client privilege is
Speaker 1: as sacrosanct as that, and there has to be a
Speaker 1: very very good reason before any prosecutor should have a
Speaker 1: right to look at some much material. All right. That
Speaker 1: was Alan Dershowitz last night about the raid on Michael Cohen,
Speaker 1: the private attorney of Donald Trump, and saying it was unconstitutional.
Speaker 1: Prior to that, you heard from Devin Newness. Yeah, he
Speaker 1: has a plan and he's gonna hold Rod Rosenstein Christopher
Speaker 1: Ray in contempt and perhaps even get to the impeachment
Speaker 1: of them if they don't give them the documents they
Speaker 1: have requested. Mark Meadows echoing that point and Uh, anyway,
Speaker 1: so joining us now to discuss and debate all these
Speaker 1: new developments. Sarah Carter, investigative reporter, journalist, Fox News Channel,
Speaker 1: David Shown, civil rights criminal defense attorney. Uh, let's start
Speaker 1: on the legal side of of this. Do you agree
Speaker 1: with Professor Dershowitz and others that I have spoken to
Speaker 1: about this raid on Michael Cohen's office? And home, and
Speaker 1: and in his hotel room. Uh. What do you think, David. Uh?
Speaker 1: Not only do I agree with him, I think, quite frankly,
Speaker 1: with all due respect to him to his responses for
Speaker 1: two mild everyone in the country should be outraged by
Speaker 1: what happen, and everyone considering going to seek the advice
Speaker 1: of a lawyer should be concerned. Uh. Probably has their
Speaker 1: rights chilled now as a result of this um. The
Speaker 1: attorney client privileges the oldest privilege that we recognize in
Speaker 1: the law. The attorney client privileges at stake here, work
Speaker 1: product privileges at stake. And I don't know Mr Cohen's
Speaker 1: continuing relationship with the President. There may be some executive
Speaker 1: privilege at stake here. But what we do know, focusing
Speaker 1: on the attorney client privileges, it should deter it will
Speaker 1: deter anybody else from seeking Mr Cohen's advice, and it
Speaker 1: ruins him in a sense. But it goes far beyond that. Look,
Speaker 1: the Justice Department, for a reason, has in its manual
Speaker 1: a several multi part uh cent of requirements before a
Speaker 1: lawyer's office can be searched like this UM, very stringent
Speaker 1: has to have the approval from upstairs. And we know
Speaker 1: now the New York Times has claiming the rate on
Speaker 1: Michael Cohen sought records on the Access Hollywood tape accent.
Speaker 1: So now we've gone from Calloo Asian with Russia, to
Speaker 1: Stormy to a playboy model Karen MacDougall, and now to
Speaker 1: the Access Hollywood tape. And I would argue that this
Speaker 1: backdoor into everything and anything Donald Trump is a fishing
Speaker 1: expedition beyond anything we've ever seen in our lives. Uh right, right,
Speaker 1: and has to be emphasized. But I'll tell you this,
Speaker 1: Mr Trump's lawyers must be proactive on this. Um. You
Speaker 1: know I made the point earlier. Mr Trump has his
Speaker 1: privilege at stake here. He shouldn't worry at this point
Speaker 1: about public relations, any of this extraneous talk from people.
Speaker 1: He has to clearly stand up for his rights um
Speaker 1: or risk a waiver. He must insist that there's absolutely
Speaker 1: no access by anyone in the Justice Department to these documents.
Speaker 1: And that's been done in the Southern District of New
Speaker 1: York before in a case where a woman who was
Speaker 1: representing terrorists, Lynn Stewart, She herself was convicted of assisting
Speaker 1: to terrorism, but they when they rated her office. The
Speaker 1: judge in the Southern District of New York, over the
Speaker 1: objection of the U. S. Attorney, required that the do
Speaker 1: you trust that that whoever is designated to filter out
Speaker 1: what is non essential or non related? Uh, make sure
Speaker 1: that it's not tainted in any way? Do you trust
Speaker 1: that person? Because I inherently do not have that trust
Speaker 1: your Is that absolutely right? No? And neither did the
Speaker 1: judge in the Southern District of Lynn Stewart's case. The
Speaker 1: Justice Department, the U. S. Attorney is off as they're said, well,
Speaker 1: we have a tainked team, a privileged team, they'll go
Speaker 1: through it. And the judge said, absolutely not. You don't
Speaker 1: look at a single document. You put those documents under steal,
Speaker 1: You provide a copy to the defendant, to the target
Speaker 1: of your search, and we're going to point a special master.
Speaker 1: They appointed the well known criminal defense lawyer at that time,
Speaker 1: Gary Enough, to tell us to review all of the
Speaker 1: documents for privilege, make an initial analysis of privilege before
Speaker 1: anyone in the government looks at any of those documents.
Speaker 1: We don't know who looked at what. Now, how do
Speaker 1: they minimize their search, which they're required to do. Did
Speaker 1: they go through the documents and read them well, Sarah Carter,
Speaker 1: that raises a lot of issues, but more importantly, you know,
Speaker 1: dovetail these two issue us together. You know, here you
Speaker 1: have thirty six hundred documents handed over as it relates
Speaker 1: to FISA abuse, the exoneration before investigation. We still haven't
Speaker 1: gotten the i G report as it relates to the
Speaker 1: the handling of the Clinton e mail investigation. We have
Speaker 1: a FISA judge led to and we can't get any
Speaker 1: information because Rod rosen Steina appointed Mueller, who also signed
Speaker 1: off on the phony uh FISA application with trumped up information,
Speaker 1: with trumped up lies that Hillary paid for. You know,
Speaker 1: the whole thing is beyond incestuous here. And I was
Speaker 1: going to say, you know, it's not only uh Mr Shoen,
Speaker 1: Mr David Shown and Alan Dershowitz and others who are
Speaker 1: upset about this in the legal side, but FBI. I
Speaker 1: can't tell you how many former and senior FBI agents
Speaker 1: I've spoken with today that our outrage. Some of them
Speaker 1: who just contacted me to to just complain, to say
Speaker 1: they've they've never seen anything like this. One of them
Speaker 1: said to me, you know, I was going to give
Speaker 1: Mueller the benefit it of the doubt. I was going
Speaker 1: to give them the benefit of the doubt until I
Speaker 1: saw what happened with attorney client privilege, until I saw
Speaker 1: this raid on Cohen's office, And I can tell you now,
Speaker 1: I am one hundred certain this is a witch hunt,
Speaker 1: which makes me wonder Sean, I hope the attorneys are
Speaker 1: listening to David shown right now. I hope they're they're
Speaker 1: listening to their legal rights of what they can do
Speaker 1: to protect the president's privileged information with the attorney, which
Speaker 1: his attorney, Michael Cohen, because this is exactly it. And
Speaker 1: I've talked to these FBI agents. They know what's going
Speaker 1: down here. They said there is no way that they
Speaker 1: should trust them with all of that information. They're not
Speaker 1: just looking for an access Hollywood tape. If you look
Speaker 1: at the New York Time story, they're very clear. They
Speaker 1: collected everything. They collected tax documents, they collected emails, they
Speaker 1: collected just everything they could get their hands. They got
Speaker 1: everything everything about everybody's private life, confidential deals, business dealings,
Speaker 1: everything that it was involved in in every way, shape,
Speaker 1: matter of form. And now we've got James Comey comparing
Speaker 1: Donald Trump to a mob boss really, we're gonna now
Speaker 1: compare Are we going to compare him to a murderer
Speaker 1: like Al Capone or Lucky Luciano or John Gotti or
Speaker 1: you know, Frank Lucas. Where do where does this end?
Speaker 1: Let's talk about the mob. Let's talk about that. Comparing
Speaker 1: Donald Trump to a mob boss. Well, this is what
Speaker 1: I got from an FBI agent. He said, you know
Speaker 1: anything about pre indictment investigations. He compared them to the mob,
Speaker 1: but worse, they have full control, They have full authority
Speaker 1: with no oversight over them. He said, Look, you can't
Speaker 1: even fight back because then the government would accuse you
Speaker 1: of obstructing them if you fight back in a pre
Speaker 1: indictment investigation. He said, So that's what you got to
Speaker 1: just lay back and take it from the government. And
Speaker 1: then you have an x FBI director Comey, who basically
Speaker 1: lied under oath, who leaked information information that was government
Speaker 1: information from his memo to a professor friend to then
Speaker 1: have it leaked to the New York Times with the
Speaker 1: hopes and he said this himself of calling on a
Speaker 1: special prosecutor to go after the president, apparently apparently successful.
Speaker 1: And that's the point here, David shown is that the
Speaker 1: deep state has been successful, and I think that Sarah's
Speaker 1: an analogy is dead on accurate. You fight back and
Speaker 1: you want to defend yourself, and the first thing they
Speaker 1: keep screaming, bloody murder is obstruction of justice. You know,
Speaker 1: people are like Tray Gouty saying, well, this is not
Speaker 1: how innocent people act. And I'm like, that's exactly how
Speaker 1: innocent people act. They fight back and defend themselves. You're right,
Speaker 1: and Sarah's right as always. But the the what's so
Speaker 1: shocking here is the two sets of standards for everything
Speaker 1: to do with the investigation of Mr. Trump. Listen right now,
Speaker 1: you've got even Senator Grassle and Congressman Ryan saying, oh, well,
Speaker 1: you know, Muller, no one should think about firing Mr Mueller.
Speaker 1: That should be sacrosanct. You're talking about passing a bill
Speaker 1: in Congress now to protect the special counsel. Let's be
Speaker 1: We're about this, and it hasn't been said enough. The
Speaker 1: regulations regarding the federal regulations regarding special counsel were developed
Speaker 1: under President Clinton. They were sold to Congress by Holder
Speaker 1: Reno and a guy named Neil Cadiell. Those guidelines specifically
Speaker 1: built in the power of the president under Article two
Speaker 1: to fire the special prosecutor through the Justice Department. So
Speaker 1: it's the Justice Department functionary who has to do it.
Speaker 1: But they recognized and they built in and the commentary
Speaker 1: makes clear the president retains that power. But the way
Speaker 1: to do it in this case, I believe is, again,
Speaker 1: as we said before, examine Mr Rosen's team. What is
Speaker 1: sacrosanct about having this person in this position the executive?
Speaker 1: The president was elected by the people to be the executive.
Speaker 1: Article two of the Constitution means something when it says something.
Speaker 1: These people served in his agencies. Should he find you're
Speaker 1: you're saying that needs to go? Of course, I mean
Speaker 1: that's every That's right, stay right there. We'll we'll pick
Speaker 1: that up when we get back, all right, As we
Speaker 1: continue with David Shone and with Sarah Carter eight hundred
Speaker 1: nine one, Shauna is a toll free telephone number, alright.
Speaker 1: So a lot of this comes down is Rod Rosenstein
Speaker 1: conflicted out of this. How does Rod Rosenstein us Hillary's
Speaker 1: bought and paid for Dassier. He's part of the renewal
Speaker 1: of this phony PISA application that lied to and omitted
Speaker 1: critical information before PISA judges, and then he also appoints
Speaker 1: Robert Mueller. How is he even there, Sarah Carter? Yeah, well,
Speaker 1: we'll have to ask Attorney General Jeff Sessions. Right, We're
Speaker 1: gonna have to ask people what's going on here, because
Speaker 1: there's there's a lot more questions than there are answers.
Speaker 1: And you know, and we know that at least I
Speaker 1: do from talking to a number of sources, that it
Speaker 1: was Rod Rosenstein that signed off on this, you know this,
Speaker 1: this warrant to go after Cohen. Now, I've been hearing
Speaker 1: a couple of different stories as to whether Sessions knew
Speaker 1: or not. I have been told that he was unaware
Speaker 1: that this was going to come down. That concerns me
Speaker 1: because I think that as the Atorney General, you should
Speaker 1: be aware. I know there's other concerns with within the
Speaker 1: Department of Justice, the fact that when they do turn
Speaker 1: over information to Congress, it's so highly redacted. And they
Speaker 1: were told that the only things that we're going to
Speaker 1: be redacted, particularly in those text messages where you know
Speaker 1: things about their relationship, their family, and then we come
Speaker 1: to find out, oh no, wait a minute, they've been redacting, Um,
Speaker 1: the information on Judge Rudy Contraris. They have been redacting
Speaker 1: names of other players I have heard within the Obama
Speaker 1: administration that we're discussed in those texts. And now you
Speaker 1: have Congress, you know, fighting tooth and nail to continue
Speaker 1: their investigations to get the information that they need to
Speaker 1: inform the American public as well as themselves about what's
Speaker 1: going on here. You have a Justice Department and an FBI,
Speaker 1: by the way, that is struggling to keep that from
Speaker 1: the public eye and fighting them tooth and nail, which
Speaker 1: brings us right back to Chairman Nuniz in the House
Speaker 1: Intelligence Committee, and they're big fight right now to just
Speaker 1: hit this electronic communication, this less than two page document
Speaker 1: that's going to explain how they opened this investigation into
Speaker 1: this alleged collusion between the Trump campaign and Russia, which,
Speaker 1: by the way, there is absolutely no evidence of whatsoever.
Speaker 1: And that's what this entire Special Council is supposed to
Speaker 1: stand on. And David, that's such a good point. There's
Speaker 1: no evidence, which I guess is now while we're talking about,
Speaker 1: you know, records on Stormy Karen McDougall and on the
Speaker 1: Access Hollywood tapes. Right listen, if you let anybody dig
Speaker 1: long enough and far enough to try to make some
Speaker 1: kind of criminal case out of some kinds of documents.
Speaker 1: As they said, you can indict a ham Salwich. That's
Speaker 1: not what we should be about, um in this country.
Speaker 1: But is it possible to impeache Rod Rosen? State? And
Speaker 1: should Congress do that? I don't know if Congress should
Speaker 1: take that action. It's not shouldn't be necessary. The president
Speaker 1: is but too in business. It's his discretion. Rosen Steve,
Speaker 1: you think the president should fire Rod Rosen's what's the
Speaker 1: fallout from that? There's there's political fall up, there's no question,
Speaker 1: But there's also mueller fall out because Mueller was appointed
Speaker 1: by Rosenstein. Doesn't Mueller then get go deaf com five?
Speaker 1: And and I guess maybe he'll look for Donald Trump's
Speaker 1: first girlfriend money was fourteen? Right? I think what you do,
Speaker 1: remember Mueller is subject to Rosenstein or to the person
Speaker 1: in that position, the acting attorney General's um, alright, I
Speaker 1: gonna have to let this go. I listened a lot
Speaker 1: more on this tonight. We'll see you both tonight on Hannity. Uh,
Speaker 1: it is outrageous. And then James Colemy, you know, comparing
Speaker 1: the president to a mob boss. Now do you understand
Speaker 1: this is a fishing expedition? Your calls next? How strange
Speaker 1: is it for you to sit here and compare the
Speaker 1: president to a mob boss? This Sunday Night on ABC
Speaker 1: and things that you know but having said they could
Speaker 1: damage President Trump. Jeemes Cooley and to those who say
Speaker 1: you should have brought Hillary Clinton before a grand jury,
Speaker 1: the exclusive interview. Everyone will be talking about this President Trump.
Speaker 1: It's starting justice. Should Donald Trump be impeached? Stephan Opolis
Speaker 1: come this Sunday night at a special time ten Nins
Speaker 1: Central on BBC. Yes, the best friend that the Clintons
Speaker 1: ever had that was involved in the war room. Let's
Speaker 1: give the first interview of James Comey calling Donald Trump
Speaker 1: up mob boss. And let's uh, I never I never
Speaker 1: wanted this for Michael Sunny Sunnay is odd, but Michael
Speaker 1: I never understood. Michael is still good for this life. Ah,
Speaker 1: that's a mom you know. But the mob family, the
Speaker 1: Trump grand family, we've got to watch out for that.
Speaker 1: Never mind the Clinton mob family, never mind the come
Speaker 1: mob family, never never mind the mother mom fever and
Speaker 1: always come Binn to the Carleon. And it comes down
Speaker 1: to the Trump grand family. That's all they want to arrest.
Speaker 1: Nobody else is why are you all laughing in there?
Speaker 1: What's it's not that good? Moonshine really got? I didn't
Speaker 1: have any moonshine today. By the way, I'm noticing the
Speaker 1: moonshine goes down dramatically every single day. Who's drinking the
Speaker 1: moonshine in there? Listen, there's a lot of Muller corruption
Speaker 1: and every time Muller says a lie, we drink. So
Speaker 1: it's gonna go quickly because Mullin never shuts. Apparently everybody,
Speaker 1: everybody likes the moonshine in there, which is interesting. So
Speaker 1: let me get this straight. So hold on, hold on?
Speaker 1: Can I say thank you to them? Can I finish first?
Speaker 1: Can I? Did you want to host a show? I'm sorry?
Speaker 1: Go ahead, hold right ahead. I'm reclaiming my time here,
Speaker 1: go ahead. We want to give a shout out the
Speaker 1: tiny twiny of the Tale of Robertson Tennessee, mellow moon moonshine?
Speaker 1: Are they the ones that sent us those day? Sent
Speaker 1: about twenty eight bottles of moonshine? So thank you? Fine,
Speaker 1: I only see five, So I only got, Like I said,
Speaker 1: Mueller has been lying a lot. We've been very busy.
Speaker 1: So who took the other? You know, two bottles? There
Speaker 1: was a Muller party, three bottles. I was counting though
Speaker 1: not okay, so well they took you. They sent twenty
Speaker 1: eight bottles of moonshine. Being hyperbolic. I'm just kidding. And
Speaker 1: they and they do have Kentucky Clear, which they have
Speaker 1: Kentucky Clear. They have a proof. I want to give
Speaker 1: a shot out to Tiny the master distiller. You also
Speaker 1: love his overalls and amazing by the way, he could
Speaker 1: be could be a character on our favorite show, Duck Dynasty.
Speaker 1: He's got a feather in his cap as far as
Speaker 1: I'm concerned, he's alright in my book. And we want
Speaker 1: to send the shot out to somebody who was listening
Speaker 1: the Southern recipe small Batch. They sent pork rins because
Speaker 1: Sewan is obsessed with pork crimes. Pork rins, But did
Speaker 1: you ever watch pork rins getting made? Its disgusting. It's
Speaker 1: not disgusting. You you need to google how to listen
Speaker 1: to me. Listen. You've got to google making pork crins
Speaker 1: because they do the little it'sy bitsy squares and then
Speaker 1: they drop him and went boom, and they blow up
Speaker 1: bigger than a kernel of popcorn. It's amazing, an amazing process.
Speaker 1: In the five minutes of free time, Linda has a day.
Speaker 1: You want her to go on YouTube and like pork crines. Listen.
Speaker 1: I love poor crimes and they're delicious and they've got
Speaker 1: a texture that is to die for. And what they
Speaker 1: do is they take pigskin and they fry it. That's
Speaker 1: what they do. So back to my thank you, which
Speaker 1: was the original points Southern recipe, small batch be adventurous,
Speaker 1: low carb, gluten free made with some flour oil. It's
Speaker 1: sent from Mark and he said, Sean, we hope these
Speaker 1: make your mouth happy. Good snacking Mark, So thank you Mark.
Speaker 1: Everybody is sending us moonshine and pork rhymes. We're gonna
Speaker 1: be fat and happy. I look forward to it. Listen.
Speaker 1: I'm thinking that, you know, now that we're in those
Speaker 1: war I just can't get over that we have an
Speaker 1: FBI X director here that is saying and comparing the
Speaker 1: president to let's see what al capone? Al Capone, it's
Speaker 1: always the family and the Trump family. It's never the
Speaker 1: Muller call me Clinton family. Is you being sick? Helping
Speaker 1: you do this. I'm thinking, if you're if you keep
Speaker 1: that ravoice, you got another career. Uh is my voice raspy. Still,
Speaker 1: I can't even tell um really. So we're gonna we're
Speaker 1: gonna compare gamblers and gambling, prostitution, bootlegging, drug trafficking, bribery, extortion, murder,
Speaker 1: and and all the like. We're gonna compare the president
Speaker 1: to that. And that's your former FBI director, you know,
Speaker 1: the very same guy that literally was involved in so
Speaker 1: many different crimes himself from you know, releasing information that
Speaker 1: was privileged with the President seeking the his BFF Robert
Speaker 1: Mueller to be the special counsel. If I'm Robert Mueller
Speaker 1: and I'm seeing what Comby is doing, what I'm saying
Speaker 1: this is a disaster because now people see that this
Speaker 1: is a witch hunt. Between that and invading the lawyer's
Speaker 1: offices and home and grabbing every record on Donald Trump
Speaker 1: they can, and now looking at Access Hollywood, Stormy Daniels
Speaker 1: and Karen McDougall that I'm sure that Stormy has a
Speaker 1: lot to offer on Ushia interference. I'm sure Karen McDougall,
Speaker 1: the former Playboy Playmate of the Year, she has probably
Speaker 1: a ton of information on Vladimir and I've got to
Speaker 1: believe the Access Hollywood tape that's gonna reveal everything that
Speaker 1: we've ever wanted to know. It's unbelievable. This is a
Speaker 1: witch hunt and a fishing expedition and started in large
Speaker 1: part by a guy that thinks that Donald Trump is
Speaker 1: a mob boss murderer. Who. Okay, Well, we're gonna put
Speaker 1: together tonight something that I think everybody's gonna like. Well,
Speaker 1: if that's the analogy that everybody wants to use, then
Speaker 1: let's make it applicable across the board. And we'll put
Speaker 1: up our chart of the Mueller crime family, the Comey
Speaker 1: crime family, and the Hillary Clinton crime family. Are you
Speaker 1: doing a six hour special tonight? Uh, that's how much
Speaker 1: time you needs. I'm gonna try. I'm gonna try and
Speaker 1: do it quickly. And let's remember that it was Bob
Speaker 1: Muller over there that when he was back in his
Speaker 1: days in Boston didn't want to talk about white bolter,
Speaker 1: talk about having real contacts to the mob, talk about
Speaker 1: when literally hide and where the bodies are buried. I
Speaker 1: want to take a look at his about the four
Speaker 1: guys that went to jail over those whitey buldr. You
Speaker 1: know what, that would be a great interview, wouldn't it
Speaker 1: they ever felt compelled to talk again, I would love
Speaker 1: to hear what they went through. Why don't we ask
Speaker 1: those two people that live because two of them actually
Speaker 1: died in prison. Yes I'm aware, but their family suffered
Speaker 1: along with them million dollars. Why don't we find that's
Speaker 1: a great idea. Why don't we find I have to
Speaker 1: give a hatchet to Ethan on that Ethan had that
Speaker 1: idea first? Okay, why don't we want Why are we
Speaker 1: giving credit out? Because that's what we do here. We
Speaker 1: play fair here on the Sean Hannity Show, unlike Crime Family.
Speaker 1: All right, so why don't we get also get the
Speaker 1: four Meryl executives that were put in jail by Andrew Weissman.
Speaker 1: I'm sure they mull I'm sure Mulla would love to
Speaker 1: harry all those story. I'm serious. We ought to. Let's
Speaker 1: put those families on, right, We'll have a little storm
Speaker 1: of our own. It'll be fantastic. We'll call it. Uh well,
Speaker 1: that would be the come Crime Family and the Mueller
Speaker 1: Crime and Manifesto. Let's take a look into it. Clinton
Speaker 1: crime family. Fantastic. All right. Now it's only about the
Speaker 1: car Elms and the Trump grand family. What about the
Speaker 1: Mala grand family. I never wanted Michael to get into
Speaker 1: this business. I never wanted Donald to get into this Yeah,
Speaker 1: all right. I think it's the worst invitation of Marlon
Speaker 1: Brando ever. You actually do a pretty good job. I mean,
Speaker 1: I tell you, when you think, like when you do
Speaker 1: that stupid Clinton joke at you're speaking events, it's upsetting.
Speaker 1: But this is good. What's upsetting I want to talk
Speaker 1: to don't do it. It wasn't an invitation. Wasn't an invitation.
Speaker 1: I'll give you a tour back stage and everything on anything.
Speaker 1: The worst part is you think that joke is appropriated
Speaker 1: eleven in the morning and I'm looking at you like
Speaker 1: new stop. And I didn't do it. At the last
Speaker 1: event you tried, you got real close. I didn't do it.
Speaker 1: And then you said, you know what, the cliff is
Speaker 1: looking kind of high. I'm not gonna There wasn't enough
Speaker 1: drinking in the room by this And Joe Lieberman's wife
Speaker 1: had four glasses. Yeah, because you knew you you knew
Speaker 1: the whole speech. You're sitting there and you're like marking off. Yeah, check,
Speaker 1: check check. That's really all right. Let's go to Marshall,
Speaker 1: who wants to suck up to Linda and Gainesville, Florida. Marshall,
Speaker 1: what's going on? Why do you want to suck up
Speaker 1: to Linda? Everybody does? John? Yes, sir, yes, me irish brother,
Speaker 1: I am. I am about to regard. I'm about to vomit.
Speaker 1: Reggitation is out. I don't know how long I have
Speaker 1: to talk, so I'll try to talk faster. But I'm
Speaker 1: to the point of vomiting, and I've got to lighten
Speaker 1: this up. Okay, So to get to the important things first,
Speaker 1: Linda and Lauren are angels. You need to quit overworking them.
Speaker 1: You need to put them on a pedestal and worship them.
Speaker 1: They are angels. We love you, Marcell. Okay, I'm gonna
Speaker 1: put them on a pedestal and worship them and not
Speaker 1: ask them to work anymore. Marble, Well, with all due
Speaker 1: respect you, you have no idea. I treat everybody on
Speaker 1: my staff very well, do I not? That's a question.
Speaker 1: Thumbs up doesn't answer that Ethan. Ethan has a really
Speaker 1: high pedestal. Actually, why not put you? Do I not
Speaker 1: take good care of you in every way imaginable. Can
Speaker 1: you just go along with can't you just say you
Speaker 1: know what, hey washel my boss, shean, He's really good
Speaker 1: to all of us. Why don't you do that. It's
Speaker 1: a shame that you try to sound like me because
Speaker 1: you don't. All right, Lauren is not even gonna defend me. Really,
Speaker 1: it's one thing to treat us well, it's another thing
Speaker 1: to treat us like the angels that we are like
Speaker 1: a princess. Okay. I don't worship at the feet of
Speaker 1: any human being, thank god. Well, see that's your first mistake.
Speaker 1: All right, Well that's where I'm staying. Uh, thank you, Marshall.
Speaker 1: I got it. Oh, crazy surfer Die goes surfing every
Speaker 1: day out in Hawaii. How are you, hey, Aloha? What's
Speaker 1: going on out in Hawaii? What you know? I guess
Speaker 1: you're out there surfing away at this noon part of
Speaker 1: your day. Oh and actually you would love it. I
Speaker 1: was diving this week and I fall to eig sharks.
Speaker 1: Yeah great, that's why I'll never go surface. I thought,
Speaker 1: if you going like Sarah at these starts, going up
Speaker 1: for this baseball of fish and I don't think Oh man,
Speaker 1: Sean would love this, You would absolutely love it, Okay.
Speaker 1: And how many shark bites take place every year out
Speaker 1: in Hawaii? You know, they don't really bite divers, so
Speaker 1: have they, But they do attack people, yes or no,
Speaker 1: they do. But October is our you know, bite season
Speaker 1: here because the mama tiger sharks or you know, very
Speaker 1: spicy then and they tend to bite people in October.
Speaker 1: So why are you You're really safe in October? Chances
Speaker 1: are you going to be fine? All right? Quick comments, die,
Speaker 1: we gotta roll. What's on your mind today? Well? You know,
Speaker 1: I was very happy to see Mr dersuitg on your
Speaker 1: show last night on Hannity. Have much respect for him
Speaker 1: standing up for the world wall and the Constitution rather
Speaker 1: than being a straight partisan on these issues. You know
Speaker 1: that this Cohen Rey, it's it's I'm disturbed at the
Speaker 1: number of of people that are not freethinking and able
Speaker 1: to use common sense with these issues. Um, they just
Speaker 1: kind of soak up whatever media narrative is of the day. Um.
Speaker 1: And I don't think that Trump should by take debate
Speaker 1: and fire Muller and seen on this either, because I
Speaker 1: mean it's almost like that's what the media wants him
Speaker 1: to do, Like, I don't know, you're gonna debate it
Speaker 1: all day long. I'm sure, but uh, I don't know's
Speaker 1: just the great thing to do. Everything in the news
Speaker 1: seems to be a narrative that I'm getting tired of it. Well,
Speaker 1: I gotta tell you it's gonna be a bumpy ride
Speaker 1: because now it's basically a declaration of war on the
Speaker 1: presidency and frankly, the American people who elected the president, um,
Speaker 1: they're now pulling out every stop, every single thing that
Speaker 1: they can possibly do to bring him down. All right,
Speaker 1: surfer died. Thank you, South Carolina. Marios standing by. What's up, Mario?
Speaker 1: How are you very great? Thank you for thinking my call.
Speaker 1: I got a couple of three things that I want
Speaker 1: to talk about. What is Sessions needs to go. Sessions
Speaker 1: needs to go. He's part of the deep state. He's
Speaker 1: not representing Trump to where he should be. So what
Speaker 1: we need is to get his number, give us his
Speaker 1: telephone number, whether it's in Washington, his home, whatever. We
Speaker 1: got to get rid of him. And the only way
Speaker 1: we can do it is we put a plan together,
Speaker 1: call him and just wear him out and get rid
Speaker 1: of him. The other one is the bait and switch
Speaker 1: program that Molapold with the South New York Attorney wonderful game. However,
Speaker 1: I guess that all of a sudden moves to Comey's deal,
Speaker 1: and Comey now all of a sudden loses his his
Speaker 1: attorney client privilege, which would means that we can ask
Speaker 1: him or go into the attorney's deal and find out
Speaker 1: what is really going on and get that piece of
Speaker 1: it done. Let me, let me, let me tell you this,
Speaker 1: the ship is sailed. And the ship has sailed because
Speaker 1: you've got an unrestrained, out of control, uh rogue prosecutor
Speaker 1: that has hell bent on hurting this president and and
Speaker 1: getting to the point where he can write a narrative
Speaker 1: of impeachment. And they're gonna try and do it anyway
Speaker 1: they can, and they're gonna push and push and push.
Speaker 1: And you know, the good thing is as you've got
Speaker 1: members of Congress now like Mark Meadows and some others,
Speaker 1: and Jim Jordan's saying, you know what, We're not gonna
Speaker 1: take it anymore, and they're now urging you know that
Speaker 1: Sessions Rosenstein be held in contempt and Brayby impeached, and
Speaker 1: we got a whole new team in there, which I
Speaker 1: don't think it is a bad idea. Let them do
Speaker 1: their job right, thinks they are wrapping up here for today.
Speaker 1: We got an amazing show tonight nineties on the Fox
Speaker 1: News Channel. One of the things if if James Comey
Speaker 1: now on the eve of his big publicity book tour
Speaker 1: and his I'm arrogant, I was right, uh, and I
Speaker 1: didn't commit any crimes and I shouldn't be investigated tour. Okay,
Speaker 1: Well we'll get into that tonight. Because if Trump's a
Speaker 1: mob boss, to that mean there's the Cally crime family
Speaker 1: and the Mueller crime family and the Rosenstein crime family,
Speaker 1: and oh does that also mean that the Clinton crime
Speaker 1: family exists. We'll get into all of that. Joe to Jenneva,
Speaker 1: Alan Dershowitzer on tonight, Sarah Carter, Michelle Malkin tonight, Congressman
Speaker 1: Mark Meadows tonight, Lara Logan of sixty Minutes, Greg Jared
Speaker 1: Sebastian Gorka. Right, So that's all coming up tonight. The
Speaker 1: best information you will get. I promise you the mainstream
Speaker 1: media won't be getting into this because the mainstream media, Oh,
Speaker 1: they're gonna be talking about Stormy and McDougal and they'll
Speaker 1: be talking about, oh, the access Hollywood tape, believe it
Speaker 1: or not, and taxi medallions because that's where their mindset is.
Speaker 1: You know, what does any of this have to do
Speaker 1: with Russia collusion? Anyway, we'll see it tonight at nine.
Speaker 1: Thank you for being with us. Back here tomorrow