WEBVTT - Oil Turns Lower With Iran-Israel Attacks 

0:00:02.720 --> 0:00:10.600
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg Audio Studios, podcasts, radio news. You're listening to the

0:00:10.600 --> 0:00:14.560
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg Intelligence Podcast. Catch us live weekdays at ten am

0:00:14.640 --> 0:00:17.880
<v Speaker 1>Eastern on Apple, Coarclay, and Android Auto with the Bloomberg

0:00:17.920 --> 0:00:21.000
<v Speaker 1>Business App. Listen on demand wherever you get your podcasts,

0:00:21.360 --> 0:00:23.120
<v Speaker 1>or watch us live on YouTube.

0:00:23.920 --> 0:00:26.520
<v Speaker 2>Taking a look at the oil market, cred prices down

0:00:26.640 --> 0:00:29.360
<v Speaker 2>by about three point seven percent on the news from

0:00:29.400 --> 0:00:32.120
<v Speaker 2>the Wall Street Journal that perhaps Aron is open to

0:00:32.280 --> 0:00:35.199
<v Speaker 2>a de escalation with Israel. Let's get more on this

0:00:35.240 --> 0:00:39.000
<v Speaker 2>with Ellen Wald, president of Transversal Consulting, joining us. Ellen

0:00:40.200 --> 0:00:43.440
<v Speaker 2>what kind of risk premium should be in the market

0:00:43.600 --> 0:00:45.560
<v Speaker 2>for at least the short term.

0:00:46.120 --> 0:00:48.720
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, I think I wouldn't be surprised between like two

0:00:48.760 --> 0:00:51.400
<v Speaker 3>and four dollars, kind of vacillating a bit. I mean,

0:00:51.400 --> 0:00:54.800
<v Speaker 3>we're definitely in a situation of much higher risk than

0:00:54.840 --> 0:00:59.200
<v Speaker 3>we were last month, but we have seen similar ish

0:00:59.240 --> 0:01:02.720
<v Speaker 3>situations and that's kind of the risk premium we saw.

0:01:03.200 --> 0:01:04.520
<v Speaker 4>I do think that.

0:01:06.240 --> 0:01:09.560
<v Speaker 3>It does depend a lot on what happens in the

0:01:09.600 --> 0:01:13.399
<v Speaker 3>Persian Gulf, other country's reactions to it, and also but

0:01:13.440 --> 0:01:15.960
<v Speaker 3>it does seem that Iran is continues to have the

0:01:16.000 --> 0:01:19.759
<v Speaker 3>ability to export oil and that's really what matters for

0:01:20.120 --> 0:01:23.920
<v Speaker 3>oil prices, whether or not these supplies are disrupted.

0:01:24.560 --> 0:01:27.759
<v Speaker 4>If they're not, then really it's just a risk premium.

0:01:27.800 --> 0:01:28.839
<v Speaker 4>It's going to go up and down.

0:01:29.240 --> 0:01:31.800
<v Speaker 3>I wouldn't be surprised if we see insurance rates for

0:01:32.560 --> 0:01:34.600
<v Speaker 3>takers go up, and that can.

0:01:34.480 --> 0:01:36.759
<v Speaker 4>Also impact prices as well.

0:01:37.200 --> 0:01:40.240
<v Speaker 3>But at the same time, you know, it's just I

0:01:40.240 --> 0:01:42.160
<v Speaker 3>think we're kind of in the in the range of

0:01:42.680 --> 0:01:45.080
<v Speaker 3>you know, maybe three four dollars.

0:01:45.400 --> 0:01:49.600
<v Speaker 5>The straits, the Straits of Hormuz that's never been closed

0:01:49.600 --> 0:01:52.360
<v Speaker 5>down in the past. Is the market as far as

0:01:52.360 --> 0:01:53.760
<v Speaker 5>you can tell when you talk to people in the industry,

0:01:53.880 --> 0:01:56.559
<v Speaker 5>are they believe that is still going to be the case,

0:01:56.680 --> 0:01:58.360
<v Speaker 5>that that's still going to be you're able to get

0:01:58.360 --> 0:02:01.280
<v Speaker 5>your oil in and out of the straight Yeah.

0:02:01.320 --> 0:02:03.440
<v Speaker 4>I think what's going on is people are.

0:02:03.440 --> 0:02:07.680
<v Speaker 3>Very jittery, and you know, every time there's any kind

0:02:07.720 --> 0:02:11.080
<v Speaker 3>of you know, military action in the Persian Gulf, that's

0:02:11.280 --> 0:02:13.760
<v Speaker 3>kind of the worst case scenario that everyone jumps to.

0:02:14.240 --> 0:02:16.240
<v Speaker 3>And I think a lot of that is a holdover

0:02:16.400 --> 0:02:19.400
<v Speaker 3>from the seventy three oil shocks, where you know, oil

0:02:19.480 --> 0:02:23.760
<v Speaker 3>was embargoed, and also from the Iran Iraq War where

0:02:23.800 --> 0:02:26.880
<v Speaker 3>there was this tanker war and essentially the US military

0:02:27.040 --> 0:02:30.920
<v Speaker 3>had to escort oil tankers out of out of the

0:02:30.919 --> 0:02:34.240
<v Speaker 3>Persian golf to ensure their safety. I don't think that

0:02:34.280 --> 0:02:36.880
<v Speaker 3>we have the same dynamic now because, first of all,

0:02:37.120 --> 0:02:40.760
<v Speaker 3>China is a really big player. China is basically the

0:02:40.840 --> 0:02:44.160
<v Speaker 3>largest customer. Asia is now the largest customer for these

0:02:44.200 --> 0:02:47.280
<v Speaker 3>Persian golf producers that includes Iran and Saudi Arabia and

0:02:47.320 --> 0:02:49.880
<v Speaker 3>other ones. And you don't want to kick the nest

0:02:50.040 --> 0:02:52.639
<v Speaker 3>when it comes to China. China is not going to

0:02:52.800 --> 0:02:55.160
<v Speaker 3>like it if their ships are disrupted, if there are

0:02:55.240 --> 0:02:59.800
<v Speaker 3>access to oil is disrupted, and so they will put

0:03:00.200 --> 0:03:04.760
<v Speaker 3>economic pressure to cool things down and to make sure

0:03:04.800 --> 0:03:09.560
<v Speaker 3>that their economic needs and desires are protected there. So

0:03:09.600 --> 0:03:11.960
<v Speaker 3>I think that's that's a new factor now that we

0:03:12.000 --> 0:03:14.400
<v Speaker 3>haven't seen that we didn't see in previous years.

0:03:14.520 --> 0:03:15.519
<v Speaker 4>There's also a matter.

0:03:15.280 --> 0:03:19.680
<v Speaker 3>Of can they physically actually close thee of wour moves.

0:03:20.280 --> 0:03:23.120
<v Speaker 3>I would argue that it's not as easy as it

0:03:23.160 --> 0:03:24.000
<v Speaker 3>seems or as they say.

0:03:24.000 --> 0:03:25.160
<v Speaker 4>They can definitely.

0:03:24.760 --> 0:03:28.200
<v Speaker 3>Threaten ships, which can also be pretty bad, but you

0:03:28.240 --> 0:03:29.720
<v Speaker 3>can't actually close it.

0:03:30.720 --> 0:03:34.480
<v Speaker 4>Eron's not the only country that has ownership over the waters.

0:03:34.480 --> 0:03:37.520
<v Speaker 3>There and you can actually re route ships into waters

0:03:37.560 --> 0:03:41.840
<v Speaker 3>into Emirati and Amani waters. It would take some time,

0:03:42.280 --> 0:03:45.960
<v Speaker 3>and during that logistical you know, inter inter period, it

0:03:45.960 --> 0:03:48.600
<v Speaker 3>would be we'd see higher oil prices.

0:03:48.640 --> 0:03:50.840
<v Speaker 4>But I do believe it would work itself out in

0:03:50.880 --> 0:03:51.160
<v Speaker 4>the end.

0:03:51.680 --> 0:03:55.200
<v Speaker 2>And there are some spare pipeline capacity through Saudi Arabia

0:03:55.200 --> 0:03:57.400
<v Speaker 2>and the UAE to bypass the straight but it is

0:03:57.400 --> 0:04:01.000
<v Speaker 2>still relatively limited. Do we have good sense as to

0:04:01.080 --> 0:04:04.680
<v Speaker 2>whether Israel truly wants to strike oil and gas facilities.

0:04:04.720 --> 0:04:06.360
<v Speaker 2>I mean, I know over the weekend we did see

0:04:06.400 --> 0:04:09.240
<v Speaker 2>some of that, but nothing that truly disrupted production.

0:04:10.120 --> 0:04:11.360
<v Speaker 4>Right, And I think that's interesting.

0:04:11.400 --> 0:04:13.920
<v Speaker 3>I think they're really walking a very close line because

0:04:14.240 --> 0:04:18.200
<v Speaker 3>all of the facilities that they hit they hit to

0:04:18.600 --> 0:04:21.640
<v Speaker 3>gas processing plants in the South Pars gas field, they

0:04:21.720 --> 0:04:27.200
<v Speaker 3>hit a fuel depot outside of Tehran, and they hit

0:04:27.240 --> 0:04:30.919
<v Speaker 3>an oil refinery, and those all have domestic impacts because

0:04:30.960 --> 0:04:34.240
<v Speaker 3>Iran doesn't export it's natural gas. It uses it only

0:04:34.279 --> 0:04:38.880
<v Speaker 3>for you know, electricity, Domestically, Iran has to make all

0:04:38.880 --> 0:04:41.520
<v Speaker 3>of its own gasoline, et cetera. So you can see

0:04:41.520 --> 0:04:47.600
<v Speaker 3>that their strikes are designed for maximum domestic effect and

0:04:47.640 --> 0:04:50.960
<v Speaker 3>that they have not touched carg Island, which is where

0:04:51.240 --> 0:04:55.200
<v Speaker 3>the ninety percent of Iran's exports are loaded into tankers,

0:04:55.560 --> 0:05:00.360
<v Speaker 3>and they haven't touched anything that would impact Iran's exports. Now,

0:05:00.720 --> 0:05:04.440
<v Speaker 3>the question is how long can they not touch them,

0:05:04.560 --> 0:05:08.400
<v Speaker 3>either by accident or because the exports are a primary

0:05:08.440 --> 0:05:11.240
<v Speaker 3>source of Iran's funding and at a certain point you've

0:05:11.240 --> 0:05:13.919
<v Speaker 3>got to go after their funding. And so I think

0:05:14.000 --> 0:05:17.360
<v Speaker 3>that right now it's not on the table. But if

0:05:17.360 --> 0:05:20.279
<v Speaker 3>there isn't any kind of resolution to this, I wouldn't

0:05:20.279 --> 0:05:23.960
<v Speaker 3>be surprised to see them at least threaten it diplomatically

0:05:24.160 --> 0:05:25.719
<v Speaker 3>or someone down the road.

0:05:26.520 --> 0:05:31.039
<v Speaker 5>Ellen Aside from the geopolitical risk there, what is underlying demand?

0:05:31.080 --> 0:05:33.520
<v Speaker 5>What are the assumptions for underlying demand for the rest

0:05:33.560 --> 0:05:35.599
<v Speaker 5>of the year for oil and gas.

0:05:36.400 --> 0:05:37.200
<v Speaker 4>It's a good question.

0:05:37.240 --> 0:05:40.039
<v Speaker 3>I think we're in a pretty good demand situation. I

0:05:40.080 --> 0:05:42.760
<v Speaker 3>do think, you know, everyone's a little bit nervous about

0:05:42.760 --> 0:05:44.560
<v Speaker 3>whether or not there might be a recession or not.

0:05:44.640 --> 0:05:47.160
<v Speaker 3>In that case, demand can go down, but otherwise demand

0:05:47.160 --> 0:05:48.279
<v Speaker 3>seems pretty stable.

0:05:48.800 --> 0:05:51.000
<v Speaker 4>I think, you know, there can be.

0:05:50.880 --> 0:05:54.599
<v Speaker 3>Some variation depending on what happens in China or you know,

0:05:54.960 --> 0:05:56.479
<v Speaker 3>or India, but in general.

0:05:56.200 --> 0:05:59.159
<v Speaker 4>Demand's pretty stable. Supply looks good as well.

0:05:59.360 --> 0:06:01.880
<v Speaker 3>I don't think we're We're not in an oversupplied situation

0:06:03.320 --> 0:06:06.480
<v Speaker 3>at this point, or like not a massive oversupplied situation,

0:06:07.200 --> 0:06:10.200
<v Speaker 3>but likewise we're not under supplied either, And so I

0:06:10.200 --> 0:06:11.920
<v Speaker 3>think prices.

0:06:11.560 --> 0:06:14.119
<v Speaker 4>Seem to be pretty good for where they are.

0:06:14.640 --> 0:06:17.080
<v Speaker 3>And I don't think unless you know, I don't think

0:06:17.160 --> 0:06:21.840
<v Speaker 3>that this issue in the Middle East, provided that it

0:06:21.880 --> 0:06:26.120
<v Speaker 3>remains within kind of the confines where Iranian oil exports

0:06:26.160 --> 0:06:30.520
<v Speaker 3>aren't hurt and Iran doesn't try to obstruct any other

0:06:30.640 --> 0:06:34.080
<v Speaker 3>oil exports, that I don't see that we shouldn't really

0:06:34.160 --> 0:06:37.120
<v Speaker 3>hit one hundred dollars a barrel, for example, because of this.

0:06:37.680 --> 0:06:39.680
<v Speaker 4>I think that that's not realistic.

0:06:39.400 --> 0:06:42.280
<v Speaker 2>So different than what we would have seen ten years ago,

0:06:42.839 --> 0:06:45.599
<v Speaker 2>all fifteen years ago. Allen, before you let you go,

0:06:46.120 --> 0:06:48.240
<v Speaker 2>what are the Saudi's doing right now? How are they

0:06:48.240 --> 0:06:50.040
<v Speaker 2>involved or not in these discussions?

0:06:51.120 --> 0:06:53.719
<v Speaker 4>The Saudis are probably involved.

0:06:53.720 --> 0:06:57.040
<v Speaker 3>I wouldn't be surprised if they're talking to Russia because

0:06:57.040 --> 0:06:59.279
<v Speaker 3>they're very keen. They'd love to be, you know, help

0:06:59.320 --> 0:07:03.560
<v Speaker 3>broker some sort of a deal here. They are privately

0:07:03.720 --> 0:07:07.799
<v Speaker 3>very happy that Israel attacked Iran's nuclear facilities. They don't

0:07:07.839 --> 0:07:10.720
<v Speaker 3>want Iran having a nuclear weapon either, but they're not

0:07:10.760 --> 0:07:13.480
<v Speaker 3>going to say that out loud in private. They you know,

0:07:13.520 --> 0:07:17.000
<v Speaker 3>they in public they are condemning Israel's attacks, but basically

0:07:17.000 --> 0:07:20.520
<v Speaker 3>there I'd say they're focused on keeping their oil supplies,

0:07:21.280 --> 0:07:24.000
<v Speaker 3>you know, going, and kind of to have.

0:07:24.040 --> 0:07:24.840
<v Speaker 4>A low profile.

0:07:25.880 --> 0:07:27.680
<v Speaker 6>All Right, Allen, thank you so much. We appreciate it

0:07:27.720 --> 0:07:28.240
<v Speaker 6>as always.

0:07:28.240 --> 0:07:31.320
<v Speaker 5>Ellen Wall the president of Transversal Consulting and a senior

0:07:31.320 --> 0:07:33.000
<v Speaker 5>fellow with the Atlantic Council.

0:07:34.720 --> 0:07:38.440
<v Speaker 1>You're listening to the Bloomberg Intelligence Podcast. Catch us live

0:07:38.520 --> 0:07:41.880
<v Speaker 1>weekdays at ten am Eastern on Applecarplay and Android Auto

0:07:42.000 --> 0:07:45.080
<v Speaker 1>with the Bloomberg Business App. Listen on demand wherever you

0:07:45.120 --> 0:07:48.120
<v Speaker 1>get your podcasts, or watch us live on YouTube.

0:07:48.720 --> 0:07:50.520
<v Speaker 2>Let's get to the markets here with the SMP up

0:07:50.600 --> 0:07:53.440
<v Speaker 2>over one percent, Fill Orlando, chief equity market strategist and

0:07:53.440 --> 0:07:57.040
<v Speaker 2>head of client portfolio Management in Federating Hermes joins us.

0:07:57.040 --> 0:07:58.320
<v Speaker 7>So Phil I was out Friday.

0:07:58.920 --> 0:08:01.720
<v Speaker 2>If I pretended Friday Day happened, the equity markets in

0:08:01.760 --> 0:08:04.240
<v Speaker 2>the exact same place it was when it closed on Thursday,

0:08:04.520 --> 0:08:07.240
<v Speaker 2>What do I make of that? When there is actual

0:08:07.440 --> 0:08:09.600
<v Speaker 2>severe geopolitical risk out there?

0:08:10.400 --> 0:08:14.640
<v Speaker 8>Well as as your previous guests just talked about I

0:08:14.640 --> 0:08:20.160
<v Speaker 8>guess there's an assumption that is dissettling, as the Israeli

0:08:20.320 --> 0:08:24.760
<v Speaker 8>attack of Iran was. Maybe Iran this is going to

0:08:24.800 --> 0:08:29.040
<v Speaker 8>force them to the bargaining table. Point number one, point

0:08:29.120 --> 0:08:32.720
<v Speaker 8>number two. Look at what transpired in the energy market

0:08:33.280 --> 0:08:35.559
<v Speaker 8>that in the first you know, four or five months

0:08:35.559 --> 0:08:38.560
<v Speaker 8>of the year, crude oil went from eighty dollars a

0:08:38.559 --> 0:08:41.600
<v Speaker 8>barrel down to fifty five. Then we spiked up to

0:08:41.679 --> 0:08:45.600
<v Speaker 8>seventy seven dollars on Friday, and now we're back down

0:08:45.679 --> 0:08:48.320
<v Speaker 8>to seventy two dollars. And if you think about what's

0:08:48.360 --> 0:08:50.920
<v Speaker 8>gone on behind the scenes, we were talking about this

0:08:51.000 --> 0:08:55.440
<v Speaker 8>at our morning meeting today. Over the last couple of months,

0:08:55.480 --> 0:09:02.280
<v Speaker 8>the Saudis spurred OPEK to sort of oversupply the market

0:09:02.520 --> 0:09:04.400
<v Speaker 8>with a lot of crude oil. In each the last

0:09:04.400 --> 0:09:08.199
<v Speaker 8>two or three months. In the United States, very quietly,

0:09:08.720 --> 0:09:12.720
<v Speaker 8>we have increased the size of our strategic petroleum reserve.

0:09:13.520 --> 0:09:16.320
<v Speaker 8>From three hundred and fifty million barrels at the beginning

0:09:16.360 --> 0:09:18.960
<v Speaker 8>of the year, we're now a little over four hundred

0:09:19.040 --> 0:09:21.840
<v Speaker 8>million barrels. I think on our way back to peak

0:09:21.880 --> 0:09:24.800
<v Speaker 8>capacity at about seven hundred and twenty million barrels. So

0:09:26.120 --> 0:09:28.760
<v Speaker 8>you wonder whether or not the United States and the

0:09:28.800 --> 0:09:35.680
<v Speaker 8>Saudis anticipated what transpired on Friday, or maybe had advanced

0:09:35.800 --> 0:09:38.680
<v Speaker 8>noticed that something might happen, and it might not be

0:09:38.720 --> 0:09:41.320
<v Speaker 8>a bad idea to, you know, make sure that there's

0:09:41.360 --> 0:09:45.480
<v Speaker 8>some fruit on hand in case there is some problems

0:09:45.520 --> 0:09:49.240
<v Speaker 8>with the Straits of Hormuz or the Uranians take their

0:09:49.240 --> 0:09:52.880
<v Speaker 8>oil up the market or whatever. And it looks like

0:09:53.200 --> 0:09:56.040
<v Speaker 8>things are reasonably stable. And so as a result of

0:09:56.040 --> 0:10:00.240
<v Speaker 8>the markets sort of bouncing back today, you know, the

0:10:00.280 --> 0:10:04.160
<v Speaker 8>benefit of having had the weekend to think through, you know,

0:10:04.240 --> 0:10:05.479
<v Speaker 8>last Friday's developments.

0:10:06.600 --> 0:10:08.440
<v Speaker 5>Phil, it's been if you look at the charter of

0:10:08.480 --> 0:10:10.480
<v Speaker 5>the s and P five hundred year to date, talk

0:10:10.520 --> 0:10:14.040
<v Speaker 5>about a v bottom and recovery here, like we should

0:10:14.080 --> 0:10:15.439
<v Speaker 5>talk about for the economy.

0:10:16.160 --> 0:10:16.560
<v Speaker 6>I don't know.

0:10:16.600 --> 0:10:18.920
<v Speaker 5>I was kind of surprised that we went down as much,

0:10:18.960 --> 0:10:21.200
<v Speaker 5>and now I'm equally surprised that we came back as

0:10:21.280 --> 0:10:22.960
<v Speaker 5>much and how quickly it all happened.

0:10:23.440 --> 0:10:24.840
<v Speaker 6>You're an old pro what do you make of what

0:10:24.880 --> 0:10:25.800
<v Speaker 6>we've seen here? To date?

0:10:26.600 --> 0:10:31.319
<v Speaker 8>Markets tend to overshoot on both sides, and we were

0:10:31.360 --> 0:10:37.400
<v Speaker 8>disappointed with the market's response to the Liberation Day chaos.

0:10:37.480 --> 0:10:41.520
<v Speaker 8>But look, frankly, the Trump administration did a poor job

0:10:41.760 --> 0:10:48.000
<v Speaker 8>in orchestrating the implementation of that tariff announcement. So the market,

0:10:48.160 --> 0:10:51.440
<v Speaker 8>in the absence of any knowledge, you know, responded appropriately

0:10:51.520 --> 0:10:54.120
<v Speaker 8>down fifteen percent in the space of a week. And

0:10:54.160 --> 0:10:56.679
<v Speaker 8>then once we had a better sense of how that

0:10:56.880 --> 0:11:00.920
<v Speaker 8>was going to work, along with how is the economy doing,

0:11:01.440 --> 0:11:04.440
<v Speaker 8>the market rebounded back to what, you know, we felt

0:11:04.440 --> 0:11:08.040
<v Speaker 8>were more reasonable levels of valuation. Remember, Paul, we talked

0:11:08.040 --> 0:11:11.120
<v Speaker 8>about this down in Washington a couple of weeks ago.

0:11:11.600 --> 0:11:13.720
<v Speaker 8>Our full year forecast for the S and P this

0:11:13.800 --> 0:11:16.720
<v Speaker 8>year is still sixty five hundred. We're sitting now a

0:11:16.760 --> 0:11:20.240
<v Speaker 8>little bit over six thousand, So we've still got you know,

0:11:20.440 --> 0:11:24.640
<v Speaker 8>five hundred points, you know, maybe eight or nine percent

0:11:24.679 --> 0:11:27.760
<v Speaker 8>of potential appreciation over the course of the back half

0:11:27.800 --> 0:11:31.720
<v Speaker 8>of the year. So there's more room for the market

0:11:31.760 --> 0:11:35.280
<v Speaker 8>to continue to grind higher if the fundamentals continue to

0:11:35.280 --> 0:11:36.000
<v Speaker 8>fall into place.

0:11:37.120 --> 0:11:40.200
<v Speaker 2>What's the safety right now? Are bonds portraying the safe

0:11:40.240 --> 0:11:41.280
<v Speaker 2>haven bid or does it have.

0:11:41.280 --> 0:11:41.760
<v Speaker 7>To be gold?

0:11:43.720 --> 0:11:46.280
<v Speaker 8>Well, Gold's been the safe haven play for a while,

0:11:46.440 --> 0:11:53.400
<v Speaker 8>and given any concerns about geopolitical risk or inflation, gold

0:11:53.480 --> 0:11:55.480
<v Speaker 8>is the play, and so having a little bit of

0:11:55.480 --> 0:11:59.320
<v Speaker 8>gold in your portfolio. I can't. I can't. I don't

0:11:59.360 --> 0:12:02.720
<v Speaker 8>have any problem with a client taking that position. But

0:12:02.840 --> 0:12:06.920
<v Speaker 8>certainly if you think that there's going to be slower

0:12:06.960 --> 0:12:14.240
<v Speaker 8>economic growth, certainly bond should rally. Treasuries historically are great

0:12:14.240 --> 0:12:18.360
<v Speaker 8>safety play. You know, we think the treasury yields benchmark

0:12:18.400 --> 0:12:21.360
<v Speaker 8>ten's are probably going to grind down towards four percent

0:12:21.760 --> 0:12:23.960
<v Speaker 8>over the balance of the year. So I don't have

0:12:24.000 --> 0:12:28.280
<v Speaker 8>a problem with investors holding both treasuries and gold as

0:12:28.320 --> 0:12:31.959
<v Speaker 8>sort of safe havens, given you know, the complete uncertainty

0:12:32.000 --> 0:12:35.160
<v Speaker 8>and volatility of what you know. We've we've watched over

0:12:35.200 --> 0:12:36.400
<v Speaker 8>the last seventy two hours.

0:12:37.360 --> 0:12:39.600
<v Speaker 5>Phil, thanks so much. Always appreciate getting a few minutes

0:12:39.640 --> 0:12:41.880
<v Speaker 5>of your time. Phil Orlando. He's a chief equity market

0:12:41.880 --> 0:12:45.720
<v Speaker 5>strategist and had a client portfolio Management and Federated Hermes

0:12:46.440 --> 0:12:49.240
<v Speaker 5>joining us there, and we spoke to Phil when we

0:12:49.240 --> 0:12:50.760
<v Speaker 5>were down in Washington a few weeks ago.

0:12:50.840 --> 0:12:52.000
<v Speaker 8>He was there as well.

0:12:53.800 --> 0:12:57.440
<v Speaker 1>You're listening to the Bloomberg Intelligence Podcast. Catch us live

0:12:57.600 --> 0:13:00.640
<v Speaker 1>weekdays at ten am Eastern on alf o'clock and Android

0:13:00.679 --> 0:13:04.000
<v Speaker 1>Auto with the Bloomberg Business app. Listen on demand wherever

0:13:04.040 --> 0:13:07.160
<v Speaker 1>you get your podcasts, or watch us live on YouTube.

0:13:07.640 --> 0:13:09.439
<v Speaker 7>We're also, of course paying attention was happening at the

0:13:09.440 --> 0:13:09.840
<v Speaker 7>G seven.

0:13:09.840 --> 0:13:12.440
<v Speaker 2>We're waiting for biladeral meeting to begin between President Trump

0:13:12.840 --> 0:13:16.960
<v Speaker 2>and Canadian Prime Minister Mark Carney. Also reports indicate that

0:13:17.000 --> 0:13:20.280
<v Speaker 2>President Trump and Germany's A Chancellor Frederick Mertz will be

0:13:20.320 --> 0:13:23.600
<v Speaker 2>meeting this morning as well at the G seven. So

0:13:23.640 --> 0:13:26.319
<v Speaker 2>we'll bring you all of those headlines of course as

0:13:26.440 --> 0:13:27.240
<v Speaker 2>they cross.

0:13:27.400 --> 0:13:27.640
<v Speaker 8>All right.

0:13:27.679 --> 0:13:29.640
<v Speaker 2>Want to get to the news though, of the last

0:13:29.640 --> 0:13:32.720
<v Speaker 2>few days, and that's what's happening with Iran and Israel.

0:13:32.800 --> 0:13:35.120
<v Speaker 7>Lots of different reports coming out right now.

0:13:35.200 --> 0:13:39.040
<v Speaker 2>Israel's continuing to strike despite reports that iron would like

0:13:39.120 --> 0:13:42.280
<v Speaker 2>to de escalate. They've exchanged fire now for the fourth

0:13:42.320 --> 0:13:46.080
<v Speaker 2>consecutive day. And this then raises the possibility and the

0:13:46.200 --> 0:13:48.199
<v Speaker 2>risk of and all out war that could drag the

0:13:48.240 --> 0:13:50.200
<v Speaker 2>rest of the Middle East as well as Western nations

0:13:50.240 --> 0:13:53.720
<v Speaker 2>into it. Ned Lazarus is Associate Professor of International Affairs

0:13:53.960 --> 0:13:58.240
<v Speaker 2>at George Washington University, joining US now, professor, what is

0:13:58.360 --> 0:14:02.160
<v Speaker 2>your base case now, uh, and what is the biggest risk?

0:14:04.200 --> 0:14:09.280
<v Speaker 9>Well, I think you brought in an important development, which

0:14:09.360 --> 0:14:13.360
<v Speaker 9>is that there are reports that Iran, through other channels,

0:14:13.360 --> 0:14:18.559
<v Speaker 9>through Arab Arab neighbors UH. And also I've heard through Cyprus,

0:14:19.120 --> 0:14:22.800
<v Speaker 9>is attempting to send messages UH to to return to

0:14:22.920 --> 0:14:27.080
<v Speaker 9>negotiations and to and to de escalate UH and to

0:14:27.480 --> 0:14:30.040
<v Speaker 9>uh you know, according to some reports, is floating the

0:14:30.080 --> 0:14:33.480
<v Speaker 9>idea that it will become more flexible in its stance

0:14:33.560 --> 0:14:40.560
<v Speaker 9>on UH enriching uranium UH and UH nuclear development. So this,

0:14:41.240 --> 0:14:45.520
<v Speaker 9>if correct, this is a signal that Israel's strikes are

0:14:46.200 --> 0:14:52.400
<v Speaker 9>being felt acutely by the regime which previously had you know,

0:14:52.480 --> 0:14:55.560
<v Speaker 9>really seem seemed to be dragging out its talks with

0:14:55.600 --> 0:15:00.000
<v Speaker 9>the Trump administration, not in any way willing to uh

0:15:00.200 --> 0:15:05.000
<v Speaker 9>uh compromise on its desire to enrich uranium to very

0:15:05.080 --> 0:15:07.880
<v Speaker 9>high levels UH and to maintain the option to break

0:15:07.880 --> 0:15:11.120
<v Speaker 9>out to you know, uh nuclear weaponization.

0:15:13.000 --> 0:15:13.640
<v Speaker 4>UH.

0:15:14.080 --> 0:15:20.200
<v Speaker 9>Whether this will actually lead to a cease fire, I

0:15:20.200 --> 0:15:24.360
<v Speaker 9>think I would say that's unlikely for the moment. I

0:15:24.360 --> 0:15:30.000
<v Speaker 9>think Israel initiated this uh uh this attack because of

0:15:30.360 --> 0:15:34.600
<v Speaker 9>an opportunity that it was time limited and a threat

0:15:34.680 --> 0:15:38.680
<v Speaker 9>that was time limited. So Israel sensed also from reports

0:15:38.680 --> 0:15:43.720
<v Speaker 9>of the International Inspectors that Iran was moving towards uh

0:15:43.920 --> 0:15:46.960
<v Speaker 9>you know, nuclear breakout or the ability to move quickly

0:15:47.000 --> 0:15:51.160
<v Speaker 9>to nuclear breakout. And Israel also has an opportunity because

0:15:52.000 --> 0:15:57.040
<v Speaker 9>Iran's entire strategy of maintaining these uh you know, this

0:15:57.200 --> 0:16:02.080
<v Speaker 9>network of regional proxies that could inflict damage on Israel

0:16:02.120 --> 0:16:04.760
<v Speaker 9>in this kind of conflict had been weakend. Israel had

0:16:04.760 --> 0:16:09.840
<v Speaker 9>taken Hasbellah out of the out of the war, essentially

0:16:09.880 --> 0:16:14.560
<v Speaker 9>out of commission. The Syrian regime of Asad collapsed because

0:16:15.080 --> 0:16:18.720
<v Speaker 9>of what Israel did to Hasbelah in essence, and Iran

0:16:19.600 --> 0:16:25.600
<v Speaker 9>lost its ability to effectively defend its airspace when Israel

0:16:25.720 --> 0:16:31.200
<v Speaker 9>responded effectively, if more quietly, to previous rounds of Iranian

0:16:31.440 --> 0:16:35.800
<v Speaker 9>missile barrages. So there's a time limited opportunity, and I

0:16:35.800 --> 0:16:39.960
<v Speaker 9>think Israel is going to maximize the damage that it

0:16:40.000 --> 0:16:42.800
<v Speaker 9>can inflict on Iran's nuclear program and its regime.

0:16:43.280 --> 0:16:44.960
<v Speaker 6>Ned would they even take it even further?

0:16:45.040 --> 0:16:48.120
<v Speaker 5>I mean, if I'm Israel, I'm on a roll here,

0:16:48.320 --> 0:16:51.160
<v Speaker 5>I mean everywhere. Look, I've been very aggressive, I've been

0:16:51.280 --> 0:16:54.840
<v Speaker 5>very successful. You just mentioned some of the successes Israel's

0:16:54.840 --> 0:16:57.560
<v Speaker 5>had against some of its enemies and the proxies and

0:16:57.600 --> 0:16:57.960
<v Speaker 5>so on.

0:16:58.480 --> 0:17:00.960
<v Speaker 6>So I press my bets here and look for.

0:17:00.960 --> 0:17:04.600
<v Speaker 5>Something bigger and around, whether it's regime change or really

0:17:04.960 --> 0:17:08.200
<v Speaker 5>really just decimating their military capabilities.

0:17:09.440 --> 0:17:12.879
<v Speaker 9>I think the ladder. Yes, I think right now, uh,

0:17:13.240 --> 0:17:16.600
<v Speaker 9>you know, the the Israeli Air Force is probably busy

0:17:16.720 --> 0:17:19.359
<v Speaker 9>both with trying to do what it can to the

0:17:19.720 --> 0:17:24.639
<v Speaker 9>you know, to the to to uh undermine the nuclear program,

0:17:25.440 --> 0:17:27.960
<v Speaker 9>but also very much I think the Israeli Air Force

0:17:28.040 --> 0:17:32.800
<v Speaker 9>is trying to take out the missile capacities because Iran

0:17:33.000 --> 0:17:36.920
<v Speaker 9>is certainly able to you know, to damage Israel. They've

0:17:37.000 --> 0:17:40.040
<v Speaker 9>killed twenty four Israelis in uh, you know, a series

0:17:40.119 --> 0:17:44.359
<v Speaker 9>of late night missile barrages that you know, their their

0:17:44.359 --> 0:17:48.320
<v Speaker 9>capacity to fire. They can fire enough huge just you know,

0:17:48.400 --> 0:17:51.560
<v Speaker 9>massive missiles that all of the Israeli air defenses cannot

0:17:51.880 --> 0:17:57.359
<v Speaker 9>hermetically prevent hits. And they've hit Tel Aviv, they've hit Haifa,

0:17:57.400 --> 0:18:01.760
<v Speaker 9>they've hit an oil refinery. So Iran is capable of

0:18:01.800 --> 0:18:05.720
<v Speaker 9>doing damage and is doing damage in a way that

0:18:06.400 --> 0:18:09.760
<v Speaker 9>you know, is painful for Israelis. The Israel obviously has

0:18:09.800 --> 0:18:12.680
<v Speaker 9>a tremendous military advantage and they are able to get

0:18:12.760 --> 0:18:16.240
<v Speaker 9>strategic Iranian sites right. So yes, I think they will

0:18:16.240 --> 0:18:18.560
<v Speaker 9>continue and I think what they are hoping to do

0:18:18.640 --> 0:18:22.400
<v Speaker 9>is really reduces Iran's capacity. Yeah, get to strike back.

0:18:22.560 --> 0:18:24.359
<v Speaker 7>Yeah, we gotta leave it there. Thanks very much.

0:18:24.400 --> 0:18:26.919
<v Speaker 2>Nand Laser, Associate Professor of the National Affairs at George

0:18:26.960 --> 0:18:27.960
<v Speaker 2>Washington University.

0:18:29.720 --> 0:18:33.440
<v Speaker 1>You're listening to the Bloomberg Intelligence Podcast. Catch us live

0:18:33.520 --> 0:18:36.600
<v Speaker 1>weekdays at ten am Eastern on Apple, Cocklay and Android

0:18:36.600 --> 0:18:39.920
<v Speaker 1>Auto with the Bloomberg Business App. Listen on demand wherever

0:18:39.960 --> 0:18:43.080
<v Speaker 1>you get your podcasts, or watch us live on YouTube.

0:18:43.840 --> 0:18:46.320
<v Speaker 5>All right, this is the gig here for the airspace

0:18:46.359 --> 0:18:49.280
<v Speaker 5>and airline industry. They get together every year and they

0:18:49.320 --> 0:18:53.480
<v Speaker 5>alternate between London, outside of London and in Paris, always

0:18:53.520 --> 0:18:56.440
<v Speaker 5>in June, plenty of rose flowing, and they never meet

0:18:56.480 --> 0:18:57.960
<v Speaker 5>in like sheboygan in January.

0:18:58.000 --> 0:19:00.440
<v Speaker 6>I know, right, So George Version is over there every year.

0:19:00.440 --> 0:19:02.159
<v Speaker 5>I send them over there and he goes and I

0:19:02.160 --> 0:19:04.280
<v Speaker 5>don't know. But this is where the big deals happen,

0:19:04.600 --> 0:19:07.320
<v Speaker 5>I mean some big orders. And right now Airbus is

0:19:07.359 --> 0:19:10.680
<v Speaker 5>dominating the story as it looks like Boeing is sitting

0:19:10.760 --> 0:19:13.439
<v Speaker 5>out here as they deal with the crash of the

0:19:13.480 --> 0:19:17.040
<v Speaker 5>Air India flight. Kate Duffy joins us Bloomberg Aviation reporter

0:19:17.240 --> 0:19:20.880
<v Speaker 5>on this Paris air Show again, I'm looking at your reporting, Kate.

0:19:21.040 --> 0:19:25.639
<v Speaker 5>Along with sid and Lean, Airbus dominates air shows. Boeing

0:19:25.680 --> 0:19:28.880
<v Speaker 5>sits out the order Freenzing tell us about what Airbus

0:19:28.920 --> 0:19:29.200
<v Speaker 5>is doing.

0:19:30.280 --> 0:19:32.880
<v Speaker 10>Yeah, absolutely, I mean this has been a big win

0:19:33.000 --> 0:19:35.560
<v Speaker 10>for air Bus currently in the show. So we've had

0:19:36.080 --> 0:19:39.640
<v Speaker 10>order from Avilease which have signed for some A three

0:19:39.720 --> 0:19:43.840
<v Speaker 10>fifty freighters and a three twenty family jets. Also Riad

0:19:43.920 --> 0:19:47.919
<v Speaker 10>Air order for fifty Airbus wide body jets and a

0:19:47.960 --> 0:19:51.639
<v Speaker 10>lot as well a Polish airline for forty eight twenties.

0:19:51.720 --> 0:19:54.400
<v Speaker 10>And as you say, Boeing has really stepped back from

0:19:54.480 --> 0:19:56.840
<v Speaker 10>the Paris Air Show this year following the seven eight

0:19:57.400 --> 0:20:00.919
<v Speaker 10>seven eight seven crash last week, so no orders have

0:20:01.040 --> 0:20:06.040
<v Speaker 10>been announced and executives are really slim in attendance or

0:20:06.160 --> 0:20:08.959
<v Speaker 10>Berg obviously canceled and they've rolled back any sort of

0:20:09.240 --> 0:20:12.600
<v Speaker 10>commercial announcements as they focus on really finding out what

0:20:12.760 --> 0:20:15.879
<v Speaker 10>happened with their India crash.

0:20:16.240 --> 0:20:20.840
<v Speaker 2>So how much of Airbus's triumph is Boeing issues like

0:20:20.880 --> 0:20:23.359
<v Speaker 2>what we saw with the seven eighty seven and Air India,

0:20:23.400 --> 0:20:25.359
<v Speaker 2>and how much of it is just like everything was

0:20:25.440 --> 0:20:27.639
<v Speaker 2>kind of going in this direction anyway, and Boeing just

0:20:27.680 --> 0:20:29.399
<v Speaker 2>has so much runway to make up.

0:20:30.520 --> 0:20:32.800
<v Speaker 10>No, I think it was definitely a cause of what

0:20:32.920 --> 0:20:36.240
<v Speaker 10>happened last week. There were potentially orders in the works,

0:20:36.840 --> 0:20:40.000
<v Speaker 10>but this is all down to sort of what happened

0:20:40.160 --> 0:20:44.439
<v Speaker 10>and executives taking the decision to not really take up

0:20:44.480 --> 0:20:47.440
<v Speaker 10>the limelight this week just because of the crash and

0:20:47.920 --> 0:20:52.480
<v Speaker 10>the consequent deaths that did happen. So yeah, there could

0:20:52.480 --> 0:20:55.000
<v Speaker 10>be orders further down the line, but at the moment,

0:20:55.040 --> 0:20:57.960
<v Speaker 10>their main focus is trying to sort of sort out

0:20:57.960 --> 0:20:59.160
<v Speaker 10>the situation in India.

0:21:00.680 --> 0:21:03.880
<v Speaker 5>So announcing big orders at these air shows is one thing.

0:21:04.119 --> 0:21:07.480
<v Speaker 5>Actually delivering the planes is another. And it's not just

0:21:07.520 --> 0:21:12.160
<v Speaker 5>bowing that Scott problems. Airbus has some production issues as well.

0:21:12.160 --> 0:21:14.119
<v Speaker 5>Can you highlight kind of where Airbus is today in

0:21:14.240 --> 0:21:16.280
<v Speaker 5>terms of their deliverables.

0:21:17.520 --> 0:21:20.679
<v Speaker 10>Yeah, absolutely, I mean Airbus is also struggling just as

0:21:20.760 --> 0:21:23.240
<v Speaker 10>much as Boeing is with the supply chain at the moment.

0:21:23.680 --> 0:21:27.520
<v Speaker 10>Is something that's happening across all airlines. You know, they

0:21:27.600 --> 0:21:30.879
<v Speaker 10>are struggling to get in these deliveries and whether it

0:21:30.920 --> 0:21:33.520
<v Speaker 10>be sort of wide bodies or narrow bodies, that is

0:21:33.560 --> 0:21:35.000
<v Speaker 10>the real pinch point at the moment.

0:21:36.520 --> 0:21:38.480
<v Speaker 7>What do you think is well in general?

0:21:38.960 --> 0:21:40.720
<v Speaker 2>I know this is the place where they unveil everything

0:21:40.720 --> 0:21:43.520
<v Speaker 2>that's cool, and it's always good, happy talk and all that.

0:21:43.600 --> 0:21:45.760
<v Speaker 2>But how is the aviation industry doing?

0:21:47.200 --> 0:21:49.000
<v Speaker 7>Abe engine is doing well at the moment.

0:21:49.000 --> 0:21:50.800
<v Speaker 10>I mean, what we're seeing here is a lot of

0:21:50.840 --> 0:21:56.280
<v Speaker 10>EVETEL companies, that's the electric vertical takeoff and landing firms,

0:21:57.040 --> 0:22:01.919
<v Speaker 10>displaying and flying their aircraft around and having lots of

0:22:01.920 --> 0:22:06.040
<v Speaker 10>interviews with the press, and that includes vertical aerospace and archer.

0:22:07.040 --> 0:22:07.920
<v Speaker 7>What we've seen is.

0:22:07.880 --> 0:22:12.200
<v Speaker 10>That they are particularly interested in sort of pointing their

0:22:12.240 --> 0:22:17.200
<v Speaker 10>aircraft towards the defense sector and selling that to defense

0:22:17.240 --> 0:22:19.520
<v Speaker 10>as they see sort of the growth in Europe that

0:22:19.640 --> 0:22:24.200
<v Speaker 10>is coming from the defense industry. We're also seeing, as

0:22:24.200 --> 0:22:29.560
<v Speaker 10>you say, lots of defense companies present. So it's doing well.

0:22:31.119 --> 0:22:33.359
<v Speaker 6>So how has the town changed?

0:22:33.359 --> 0:22:35.840
<v Speaker 5>Because now I might take a meeting if I'm an

0:22:35.880 --> 0:22:38.879
<v Speaker 5>aerospace company with I don't know Italy, because now it

0:22:38.880 --> 0:22:41.840
<v Speaker 5>looks like they're going to have to spend more on defense, Germany.

0:22:41.440 --> 0:22:42.119
<v Speaker 6>And all the others.

0:22:42.800 --> 0:22:46.399
<v Speaker 5>Is there are different meetings taking place between I don't know,

0:22:46.840 --> 0:22:48.760
<v Speaker 5>the contractors themselves in various countries.

0:22:50.080 --> 0:22:52.680
<v Speaker 10>Yeah, there's lots of meetings taking place. I mean, we've

0:22:52.680 --> 0:22:56.280
<v Speaker 10>seen executives on the ground, such as air Burski and FOURY,

0:22:57.320 --> 0:23:01.640
<v Speaker 10>also Talz and Leonardo as well. What we're watching there,

0:23:01.640 --> 0:23:05.680
<v Speaker 10>for example, is the possible space merger between those three

0:23:06.000 --> 0:23:08.720
<v Speaker 10>and what could come of that. There's a huge space

0:23:08.800 --> 0:23:12.240
<v Speaker 10>hub just further down the air show at the moment,

0:23:12.800 --> 0:23:16.919
<v Speaker 10>so that's interesting. That's the first time they've done it.

0:23:17.000 --> 0:23:20.600
<v Speaker 10>We've also got the Ariane five on site, lots of

0:23:20.760 --> 0:23:25.399
<v Speaker 10>planes on display, people walking around, private jets, people walking

0:23:25.440 --> 0:23:29.359
<v Speaker 10>onto helicopters and also sitting in the fighter jets too.

0:23:30.200 --> 0:23:32.880
<v Speaker 10>But yeah, there are lots of business meetings happening. We're

0:23:32.880 --> 0:23:36.400
<v Speaker 10>speaking to defense executives, they're meeting with other defense companies.

0:23:36.600 --> 0:23:39.000
<v Speaker 10>So there's lots of collaboration in Europe. There's lots of

0:23:39.080 --> 0:23:44.080
<v Speaker 10>cooperation and partnerships happening and possibly you know, chances of

0:23:44.200 --> 0:23:45.920
<v Speaker 10>M and A happening in the near future too.

0:23:46.200 --> 0:23:47.600
<v Speaker 7>Really, that's quite interesting.

0:23:48.040 --> 0:23:50.520
<v Speaker 2>What about US defense companies, Like, if Europe wants to

0:23:50.600 --> 0:23:52.720
<v Speaker 2>ram up its defense budget, do they really want to

0:23:52.720 --> 0:23:55.440
<v Speaker 2>do that with US companies when there's still terriff issues.

0:23:56.440 --> 0:23:59.000
<v Speaker 10>I think that is a struggle at the moment, you know,

0:23:59.040 --> 0:24:01.800
<v Speaker 10>we're sort of hearing that the potentially there is more,

0:24:01.840 --> 0:24:04.320
<v Speaker 10>there is more growth in Europe, and I think European

0:24:04.359 --> 0:24:06.760
<v Speaker 10>companies want to find out more, you know what are

0:24:06.800 --> 0:24:09.160
<v Speaker 10>the companies are out there to beef up their portfolios.

0:24:09.760 --> 0:24:14.280
<v Speaker 10>For example, we spoke with Honeywell yesterday and they have

0:24:14.359 --> 0:24:17.520
<v Speaker 10>a lot of components on fighter jets and they were

0:24:17.560 --> 0:24:20.800
<v Speaker 10>saying that they are looking at sort of M and

0:24:20.880 --> 0:24:26.080
<v Speaker 10>A in and across Europe and also expanding their own

0:24:26.160 --> 0:24:30.040
<v Speaker 10>existing capabilities as well, so factories in the UK, Germany

0:24:30.160 --> 0:24:30.800
<v Speaker 10>and Poland.

0:24:33.280 --> 0:24:36.840
<v Speaker 5>Oh well there, okay, all right, very good. We'll make

0:24:36.840 --> 0:24:38.960
<v Speaker 5>that a nice easy spot to get out. Kate Duffy

0:24:39.359 --> 0:24:42.400
<v Speaker 5>Bloomberg Aviation Report on the Paris Air Show in Paris.

0:24:43.040 --> 0:24:47.720
<v Speaker 1>This is the Bloomberg Intelligence Podcast, available on Apple, Spotify,

0:24:47.960 --> 0:24:51.400
<v Speaker 1>and anywhere else you get your podcasts. Listen live each

0:24:51.440 --> 0:24:55.399
<v Speaker 1>weekday ten am to nooneisterne on Bloomberg dot com, the

0:24:55.480 --> 0:24:59.359
<v Speaker 1>iHeartRadio app, tune In, and the Bloomberg Business App. You

0:24:59.359 --> 0:25:02.679
<v Speaker 1>can also watch us live every weekday on YouTube and

0:25:02.880 --> 0:25:04.840
<v Speaker 1>always on the Bloomberg terminal