WEBVTT - AMD Earnings, UK AI Summit, The Fed & Valuations

0:00:01.800 --> 0:00:02.520
<v Speaker 1>From Marhart.

0:00:02.640 --> 0:00:07.080
<v Speaker 2>We're Innovation, Money and Power Collie in Silicon Valley, NBN.

0:00:07.440 --> 0:00:11.480
<v Speaker 3>This is Bloomberg Technology with Caroline Hyde and Ed Ludlow.

0:00:25.280 --> 0:00:27.680
<v Speaker 4>I'm Caroline Heyde of Bloomberg's world headquarters in New York,

0:00:29.040 --> 0:00:30.720
<v Speaker 4>and I'm an adler in San Francisco.

0:00:30.840 --> 0:00:33.000
<v Speaker 5>This is Bloomberg Technology coming up.

0:00:33.080 --> 0:00:36.199
<v Speaker 4>Amd rallies on AI optimism, as the company says it's

0:00:36.280 --> 0:00:39.680
<v Speaker 4>artificial intelligence chip will generate billions next year.

0:00:40.440 --> 0:00:43.239
<v Speaker 3>Plus, the UK Summit on AI Safety is underway in

0:00:43.280 --> 0:00:46.800
<v Speaker 3>London with attendees including Kamala Harris and Elon Musk. Will

0:00:46.800 --> 0:00:50.000
<v Speaker 3>bring you the big takeaways and interviews from the event, and.

0:00:49.880 --> 0:00:52.159
<v Speaker 4>We'll push you ahead to the Federal Reserve rate decision

0:00:52.200 --> 0:00:54.440
<v Speaker 4>due out later this afternoon and look at the central

0:00:54.480 --> 0:00:57.800
<v Speaker 4>banks impact on you guess, the AI startups. But first

0:00:57.840 --> 0:01:00.720
<v Speaker 4>let's check in on these markets, because well, we do

0:01:00.840 --> 0:01:03.480
<v Speaker 4>have some movement ahead of the all important decision, but

0:01:03.520 --> 0:01:05.320
<v Speaker 4>many are thinking, yes, rate's going to stay at that

0:01:05.400 --> 0:01:07.880
<v Speaker 4>twenty two year high for yet another month. We're seeing

0:01:07.880 --> 0:01:10.160
<v Speaker 4>the NASTAC up some seven tens of percent. Maybe it's

0:01:10.160 --> 0:01:13.360
<v Speaker 4>actually some of the economic data, Ed that's weighing on. Well,

0:01:13.360 --> 0:01:15.200
<v Speaker 4>the bad news being good news once more, if we're

0:01:15.200 --> 0:01:17.800
<v Speaker 4>seeing some of those factory orders coming in worse than expected,

0:01:17.840 --> 0:01:20.600
<v Speaker 4>if we're seeing jobless claims actually just ticking up more, indeed,

0:01:20.680 --> 0:01:24.360
<v Speaker 4>job openings starting to open up a little bit, maybe

0:01:24.360 --> 0:01:25.920
<v Speaker 4>this is something that we're trying to get, this mixed

0:01:25.959 --> 0:01:28.080
<v Speaker 4>picture of where the economy is really going. Whatever the case,

0:01:28.080 --> 0:01:30.399
<v Speaker 4>we're seeing some buoyancy in tech. We're seeing some boyancy

0:01:30.440 --> 0:01:32.959
<v Speaker 4>in the bomb market, yields falling that of course as

0:01:33.000 --> 0:01:34.959
<v Speaker 4>we get a hint that actually will see a slowing

0:01:35.000 --> 0:01:37.400
<v Speaker 4>of pace of growth in the amount of bonds that

0:01:37.440 --> 0:01:39.800
<v Speaker 4>will be issued on the long dated end by the

0:01:39.880 --> 0:01:42.720
<v Speaker 4>US Treasury, so lack of supply means yiels fall down.

0:01:42.760 --> 0:01:44.760
<v Speaker 4>We're seeing the VIX indexs just lower a little bit.

0:01:44.760 --> 0:01:48.560
<v Speaker 4>There's some calming over, of course, still concerns over geopolitics.

0:01:48.600 --> 0:01:50.440
<v Speaker 4>Move on to what's happening in the world the crypto though,

0:01:50.480 --> 0:01:53.280
<v Speaker 4>because on the day, even as VIX pulls back, options

0:01:53.280 --> 0:01:55.040
<v Speaker 4>protection maybe lower a bit. Even though we heard the

0:01:55.080 --> 0:01:57.280
<v Speaker 4>Apple maybe ticking up a little bit ahead of its earnings,

0:01:57.320 --> 0:01:59.200
<v Speaker 4>we're looking at crypto just on the downside by about

0:01:59.200 --> 0:02:01.360
<v Speaker 4>a percentage point. This as we see the dollar treading

0:02:01.360 --> 0:02:02.760
<v Speaker 4>water at thirty four thousand the end.

0:02:02.800 --> 0:02:05.520
<v Speaker 5>What are you watching on the micraft AMD?

0:02:05.760 --> 0:02:07.640
<v Speaker 3>This is the big technology story of the day, at

0:02:07.720 --> 0:02:10.600
<v Speaker 3>least from a market mover perspective. We're up always eight percent,

0:02:10.680 --> 0:02:13.639
<v Speaker 3>on track for the biggest jump since May. The story

0:02:13.919 --> 0:02:18.160
<v Speaker 3>the MII three hundred. AMD's AI accelerator on track to

0:02:18.240 --> 0:02:21.160
<v Speaker 3>start production and shipments in the final three months of

0:02:21.200 --> 0:02:24.640
<v Speaker 3>the year. Four hundred million dollars of revenue in the

0:02:24.680 --> 0:02:28.200
<v Speaker 3>current period coming from its AI accelerator two billion dollars

0:02:28.200 --> 0:02:30.840
<v Speaker 3>of revenue the company season four year twenty four, and

0:02:30.919 --> 0:02:33.640
<v Speaker 3>AMD is saying this will be the fastest of its

0:02:33.680 --> 0:02:36.360
<v Speaker 3>products to ever hit one billion dollars of revenue. This

0:02:36.520 --> 0:02:39.760
<v Speaker 3>is the direct competitor to Nvidia's h one hundred. We're

0:02:39.800 --> 0:02:43.200
<v Speaker 3>talking about a GPU that ships is an assemble component

0:02:43.440 --> 0:02:47.640
<v Speaker 3>for hyperscalers, data centers, and large AI startups to train

0:02:48.120 --> 0:02:52.520
<v Speaker 3>LM's large language models and foundation models. And that's despite

0:02:52.639 --> 0:02:55.360
<v Speaker 3>giving its current period forecast five point eight billion to

0:02:55.400 --> 0:02:58.919
<v Speaker 3>six point four billion dollars, the midpoint of that range

0:02:58.960 --> 0:03:01.960
<v Speaker 3>was below Street Can census. The concern for them separately

0:03:02.320 --> 0:03:04.800
<v Speaker 3>is a slow down in gaming CHIT sales, but AI

0:03:04.919 --> 0:03:07.280
<v Speaker 3>to the rescue and It's funny because the stock fell

0:03:07.320 --> 0:03:10.320
<v Speaker 3>in after hours during the earning school, it was week

0:03:10.400 --> 0:03:12.720
<v Speaker 3>during pre market trading, and it's gone off like a

0:03:12.800 --> 0:03:15.160
<v Speaker 3>rocket during the main session this Wednesday in Certaly.

0:03:15.200 --> 0:03:18.280
<v Speaker 4>Has let's stelve into someone who's perhaps benefiting from the rocket.

0:03:18.560 --> 0:03:21.280
<v Speaker 4>Evana de Leskas, with our CIO of Spear invested AMD

0:03:21.360 --> 0:03:25.239
<v Speaker 4>a key holding. I'm interested in how you balance out

0:03:25.360 --> 0:03:28.200
<v Speaker 4>that narrative that there is weakness, particularly in Europe when

0:03:28.200 --> 0:03:30.799
<v Speaker 4>you're coming to desire to get into industrial chips. There

0:03:30.840 --> 0:03:34.120
<v Speaker 4>is worry about China, but AI is still the bright spot.

0:03:35.200 --> 0:03:37.800
<v Speaker 6>That's right, Caroline. So we see AI as a pretty

0:03:37.800 --> 0:03:40.880
<v Speaker 6>big opportunity. And it's not just on the GPU side

0:03:40.880 --> 0:03:45.120
<v Speaker 6>for AMD, it's across the board data center spending. So

0:03:45.480 --> 0:03:48.840
<v Speaker 6>we believe they're going to benefit from this YouTube the Milano,

0:03:49.120 --> 0:03:52.680
<v Speaker 6>but also from their CPUs as well, like the Berghama

0:03:52.680 --> 0:03:55.160
<v Speaker 6>and Gene And that was really the big surprise this quarter.

0:03:55.560 --> 0:03:59.920
<v Speaker 6>Investors had expected that AMD's guidance was very aggressive for

0:04:00.080 --> 0:04:02.640
<v Speaker 6>the second half of this year, but they were able

0:04:02.680 --> 0:04:06.120
<v Speaker 6>to deliver and guide to still fifty percent growth for

0:04:06.280 --> 0:04:08.040
<v Speaker 6>the data center segment overall.

0:04:08.200 --> 0:04:10.240
<v Speaker 4>Now thinking more about a two billion run right by

0:04:10.240 --> 0:04:12.640
<v Speaker 4>the end of it. I'm interested as to whether you

0:04:12.720 --> 0:04:16.320
<v Speaker 4>think these two players and Video and AMD are going

0:04:16.360 --> 0:04:18.919
<v Speaker 4>to be the ones that take all. Whether the market

0:04:19.000 --> 0:04:21.000
<v Speaker 4>is going to be so large that vast the time

0:04:21.080 --> 0:04:22.839
<v Speaker 4>of one hundred and fifty billion or so that we

0:04:22.880 --> 0:04:25.120
<v Speaker 4>can still see entrance taking market share.

0:04:25.720 --> 0:04:29.239
<v Speaker 6>So we do see new entrants coming in. However, AMD

0:04:29.320 --> 0:04:31.720
<v Speaker 6>and in Nvidia have the early start, so they're going

0:04:31.760 --> 0:04:34.280
<v Speaker 6>to be able to capture significant part of the market share.

0:04:34.560 --> 0:04:36.960
<v Speaker 6>We're going to see some of the cloud vendors develop

0:04:37.000 --> 0:04:39.839
<v Speaker 6>their own solutions as well, so we see them benefiting

0:04:40.080 --> 0:04:44.400
<v Speaker 6>from this trend. Amazon has some new products that they're introducing,

0:04:44.720 --> 0:04:48.040
<v Speaker 6>but in Nvidia NAMD will be able to capture a

0:04:48.120 --> 0:04:50.680
<v Speaker 6>big part of market share as their first movers in

0:04:50.680 --> 0:04:51.600
<v Speaker 6>this market.

0:04:52.080 --> 0:04:54.680
<v Speaker 3>If our AMD shares are up eight percent, as I said,

0:04:54.680 --> 0:04:56.680
<v Speaker 3>on track for the biggest jump since May, and a

0:04:56.680 --> 0:05:00.160
<v Speaker 3>lot of the cell side talking about the Mi three

0:05:00.240 --> 0:05:00.920
<v Speaker 3>hundred being the.

0:05:01.040 --> 0:05:02.240
<v Speaker 5>Catalyst for the stock.

0:05:02.320 --> 0:05:07.479
<v Speaker 3>Right, your ETF includes both AMD and Nvidia. The Mi

0:05:07.720 --> 0:05:11.360
<v Speaker 3>three hundred is a direct competitor to the H one hundred,

0:05:11.400 --> 0:05:13.680
<v Speaker 3>which is already out there in the real world in volume.

0:05:14.080 --> 0:05:15.320
<v Speaker 5>So how do you play this?

0:05:15.600 --> 0:05:19.159
<v Speaker 3>How do you consider the composition of the ETF going forward.

0:05:19.800 --> 0:05:23.000
<v Speaker 6>So we see data center as a trillion dollar market

0:05:23.040 --> 0:05:25.680
<v Speaker 6>that is going to need upgrading, right, so we see

0:05:25.720 --> 0:05:30.080
<v Speaker 6>opportunities for multiple players. The shares of Nvidia have styled

0:05:30.120 --> 0:05:34.400
<v Speaker 6>out recently due to China concerns and also people just

0:05:34.560 --> 0:05:38.279
<v Speaker 6>being cautious on the AI being hype versus reality. But

0:05:38.400 --> 0:05:41.760
<v Speaker 6>we do believe that we are going to see significant investments,

0:05:41.800 --> 0:05:43.800
<v Speaker 6>and we do think that these companies are going to

0:05:43.800 --> 0:05:47.320
<v Speaker 6>be able to compound at over fifty percent GIGER over

0:05:47.360 --> 0:05:48.400
<v Speaker 6>the next few years.

0:05:49.960 --> 0:05:53.000
<v Speaker 3>The story of Nvidia over the course of twenty twenty

0:05:53.000 --> 0:05:55.479
<v Speaker 3>three is a stock up almost one hundred and ninety percent,

0:05:56.000 --> 0:06:00.839
<v Speaker 3>So you expect AMD's stock to track like Nvidia story

0:06:00.880 --> 0:06:02.799
<v Speaker 3>did with the h one hundred if they can prove

0:06:02.920 --> 0:06:05.560
<v Speaker 3>that they can scale up mi I three hundred in

0:06:05.600 --> 0:06:07.480
<v Speaker 3>the same way that Nvidia did.

0:06:08.240 --> 0:06:11.320
<v Speaker 6>Well in Nvidia really got oversold at some point in

0:06:11.360 --> 0:06:13.400
<v Speaker 6>the cycle, so a lot of what you're seeing here

0:06:13.440 --> 0:06:16.600
<v Speaker 6>in terms of the move is from really depressed levels.

0:06:16.920 --> 0:06:19.799
<v Speaker 6>So we do see similar upsite from here for both

0:06:19.920 --> 0:06:21.760
<v Speaker 6>in Nvidia in and AMD.

0:06:23.000 --> 0:06:25.240
<v Speaker 4>I mean, what's really interesting is, of course you set

0:06:25.320 --> 0:06:28.360
<v Speaker 4>up and launched sprx in large part to find the

0:06:28.440 --> 0:06:32.200
<v Speaker 4>undervalued areas of particularly B to B industrial use of tech.

0:06:33.279 --> 0:06:36.120
<v Speaker 4>Talk to us from a macro perspective geographically, where you

0:06:36.200 --> 0:06:38.919
<v Speaker 4>are worried about because there was serious signs of some

0:06:39.040 --> 0:06:42.200
<v Speaker 4>European slowdown is not going to be long lasting. Do

0:06:42.240 --> 0:06:44.880
<v Speaker 4>we think that that can be offset by the satiable

0:06:44.880 --> 0:06:46.440
<v Speaker 4>demand for artificial intelligence?

0:06:46.880 --> 0:06:49.920
<v Speaker 6>Yeah, well, Caroline. Interestingly, technology is going to be one

0:06:50.000 --> 0:06:53.840
<v Speaker 6>of the least sensitive to the economy sectors. So while

0:06:53.839 --> 0:06:56.039
<v Speaker 6>you're going to see some movement like, for example, in

0:06:56.080 --> 0:06:59.520
<v Speaker 6>consumer technology, we see some downside in autos. We're seeing

0:06:59.520 --> 0:07:02.279
<v Speaker 6>a lot of negative data points on the EV side.

0:07:02.640 --> 0:07:06.760
<v Speaker 6>We saw similar impact on semiconductor companies that sell to autos.

0:07:06.839 --> 0:07:09.520
<v Speaker 6>So we believe that consumer is going to be where

0:07:09.600 --> 0:07:11.960
<v Speaker 6>the downside is going to be in the near term

0:07:12.040 --> 0:07:15.720
<v Speaker 6>here driven by the economy and really high interest rates.

0:07:16.360 --> 0:07:18.360
<v Speaker 6>So those areas of the economy are going to be

0:07:18.400 --> 0:07:22.120
<v Speaker 6>more sensitive and that's what we are avoiding. However, enterprise

0:07:22.320 --> 0:07:25.960
<v Speaker 6>just went through a down cycle in spending. Companies already

0:07:25.960 --> 0:07:28.840
<v Speaker 6>cut their budgets to a pretty low level, so we

0:07:28.960 --> 0:07:32.960
<v Speaker 6>see those comps being pretty favorable position going into twenty

0:07:33.000 --> 0:07:37.560
<v Speaker 6>twenty four. So areas like cloud data infrastructure, cybersecurity. We

0:07:37.600 --> 0:07:40.320
<v Speaker 6>think those are going to be good areas to be

0:07:40.360 --> 0:07:41.920
<v Speaker 6>into it next year.

0:07:42.920 --> 0:07:45.040
<v Speaker 3>Ivan, I always wanted to ask you how much you

0:07:45.160 --> 0:07:47.760
<v Speaker 3>nerd out, how deep you go on the details on

0:07:47.840 --> 0:07:49.920
<v Speaker 3>a product like this. Right, we're going to look at

0:07:49.960 --> 0:07:52.840
<v Speaker 3>some pictures of the Mi three hundred. You know, a

0:07:52.840 --> 0:07:55.200
<v Speaker 3>lot of the work in the market this morning is

0:07:55.240 --> 0:07:57.920
<v Speaker 3>based on what Lisa Sue had to say. Do you

0:07:58.040 --> 0:08:00.960
<v Speaker 3>go through the specs of these semikinduct and go with

0:08:01.000 --> 0:08:03.760
<v Speaker 3>your own conviction call based on deep research or do

0:08:03.840 --> 0:08:06.600
<v Speaker 3>you just go based on the commentary of executives.

0:08:07.600 --> 0:08:11.160
<v Speaker 6>So we do very fundamental deep research, and what where

0:08:11.200 --> 0:08:15.120
<v Speaker 6>we differentiate ourselves is that we read data across the

0:08:15.240 --> 0:08:17.960
<v Speaker 6>value chain. So we're going to be talking to companies

0:08:18.040 --> 0:08:20.680
<v Speaker 6>like Microsoft that are going to be partnering with companies

0:08:20.720 --> 0:08:24.000
<v Speaker 6>like Nvidia. We're talking to smaller cap companies that sell

0:08:24.280 --> 0:08:28.440
<v Speaker 6>liquid cooling to the data center segment, that are selling

0:08:28.520 --> 0:08:31.800
<v Speaker 6>casings to the data center segment. So we gather these

0:08:31.880 --> 0:08:35.520
<v Speaker 6>data points from multiple sources and that gives us confidence

0:08:35.559 --> 0:08:38.600
<v Speaker 6>in where the data center spending cycle is going. So

0:08:38.640 --> 0:08:42.440
<v Speaker 6>it really is not about just following what management is saying.

0:08:42.800 --> 0:08:45.680
<v Speaker 6>Is really trying to understand how they're positioned in the

0:08:45.720 --> 0:08:48.760
<v Speaker 6>ecosystem by getting data points from the supply chain.

0:08:49.080 --> 0:08:52.199
<v Speaker 4>Even doing that sort of deep research touts shore cet development.

0:08:52.240 --> 0:08:56.760
<v Speaker 4>Millennium Global companies with global perspectives give us the global

0:08:56.800 --> 0:08:58.840
<v Speaker 4>take on how much MPD is going to be exposed

0:08:58.920 --> 0:09:02.400
<v Speaker 4>to China and the continues when it comes to top

0:09:02.760 --> 0:09:04.240
<v Speaker 4>in technology, Well.

0:09:04.200 --> 0:09:06.160
<v Speaker 6>China is going to be a big risk to both

0:09:06.280 --> 0:09:09.520
<v Speaker 6>AMD and Nvidia, and we're going to see how the geopolitics.

0:09:09.520 --> 0:09:12.760
<v Speaker 6>We don't necessarily make geopolitical calls, so we're going to

0:09:12.800 --> 0:09:15.440
<v Speaker 6>see how that evolves over the next few years. But

0:09:15.480 --> 0:09:18.559
<v Speaker 6>it's a pretty large market and both the AM and

0:09:18.760 --> 0:09:21.120
<v Speaker 6>VDIA are very well positioned there because they're really the

0:09:21.120 --> 0:09:25.360
<v Speaker 6>only game in town. And the consumer side in China

0:09:25.480 --> 0:09:28.400
<v Speaker 6>of enterprise companies is pretty large and there are pretty

0:09:28.400 --> 0:09:31.920
<v Speaker 6>big consumers of this product. So if they're shut down

0:09:32.000 --> 0:09:35.720
<v Speaker 6>from this market, we do see the upside going maybe

0:09:35.760 --> 0:09:39.839
<v Speaker 6>five years out being really cupped and we see earning

0:09:39.920 --> 0:09:42.480
<v Speaker 6>stalling out then. But for the next three years, we

0:09:42.600 --> 0:09:49.640
<v Speaker 6>do see strong demand just from US domestic hyperscalers and enterprises.

0:09:49.679 --> 0:09:53.960
<v Speaker 6>We've not really seen enterprises participate in this cycle yet,

0:09:54.080 --> 0:09:57.120
<v Speaker 6>so we do see pretty significant near terms upset in

0:09:57.160 --> 0:09:58.280
<v Speaker 6>the next two to three years.

0:09:58.880 --> 0:10:01.320
<v Speaker 3>Vana de la Lasco Beer invest great to catch up

0:10:01.360 --> 0:10:03.559
<v Speaker 3>with you, and thank you for that technical expertise as well.

0:10:03.559 --> 0:10:10.880
<v Speaker 5>We appreciate it.

0:10:12.240 --> 0:10:15.760
<v Speaker 4>The UK Summit on AI Safety is underway, and earlier

0:10:15.920 --> 0:10:18.440
<v Speaker 4>on Bloomberg caught up with the CEO of Google's Deep

0:10:18.480 --> 0:10:21.400
<v Speaker 4>Mind about the future benefits of artificial intelligence to stick

0:10:21.440 --> 0:10:21.760
<v Speaker 4>a listen.

0:10:22.600 --> 0:10:24.240
<v Speaker 7>I think the message that we bring is one of

0:10:24.240 --> 0:10:27.200
<v Speaker 7>cautious optimism. Obviously, we're working on this technology because we

0:10:27.320 --> 0:10:29.440
<v Speaker 7>think it'll be one of the most beneficial technologies to

0:10:29.520 --> 0:10:33.679
<v Speaker 7>society ever. But it does come with attending risks, as

0:10:33.720 --> 0:10:36.360
<v Speaker 7>all transformative technologies do, and I think we need to

0:10:36.400 --> 0:10:39.120
<v Speaker 7>take those seriously, ranging from the near term risk to

0:10:39.640 --> 0:10:43.120
<v Speaker 7>the longer term technological risks, and I think we need

0:10:43.160 --> 0:10:46.080
<v Speaker 7>to start an international dialogue about that now. So it's

0:10:46.080 --> 0:10:47.840
<v Speaker 7>fantastic to see this happening in the summit, and.

0:10:47.840 --> 0:10:51.040
<v Speaker 8>There is divergence from policymakers, but there's also divergence and

0:10:51.120 --> 0:10:53.920
<v Speaker 8>quite passionate splits within your own community.

0:10:53.960 --> 0:10:54.920
<v Speaker 5>You're very aware of this.

0:10:55.080 --> 0:10:58.520
<v Speaker 8>The head of AI at Meta Anderkut saying name checking

0:10:58.559 --> 0:11:02.359
<v Speaker 8>in saying you're them hungering, there's maybe regulatory capture.

0:11:02.040 --> 0:11:02.880
<v Speaker 5>Going on here.

0:11:03.640 --> 0:11:07.360
<v Speaker 8>Your response to that critique, because ya, look isn't alone.

0:11:07.360 --> 0:11:10.679
<v Speaker 8>There are others who say, quote unquote, that is preposterous

0:11:10.720 --> 0:11:13.640
<v Speaker 8>to talk about some of these existential risks fearmongering. Is

0:11:13.679 --> 0:11:15.640
<v Speaker 8>that what you're doing, Dennis, though, of course not.

0:11:15.760 --> 0:11:18.360
<v Speaker 7>And there's equal luminaries on the other side of the

0:11:18.400 --> 0:11:22.440
<v Speaker 7>camp as well, including some of Yan's fellow Cheering Award winners,

0:11:23.040 --> 0:11:24.400
<v Speaker 7>And we've all known each other for a long time

0:11:24.440 --> 0:11:28.439
<v Speaker 7>actually for the academic community, and as far as sort

0:11:28.440 --> 0:11:30.920
<v Speaker 7>of regulatory capture and other things, I think that's pretty preposterous.

0:11:30.920 --> 0:11:33.120
<v Speaker 7>We've been myself and Shane Leger, one of my other

0:11:33.160 --> 0:11:35.280
<v Speaker 7>co founders of d Mine, have been talking about AI

0:11:35.320 --> 0:11:37.600
<v Speaker 7>safety since we were post docs and academics in two

0:11:37.600 --> 0:11:41.199
<v Speaker 7>thousand and nine, so before we'd even started our companies.

0:11:41.640 --> 0:11:45.160
<v Speaker 7>So I think it's comes from a genuine, actually uncertainty

0:11:45.480 --> 0:11:49.079
<v Speaker 7>around where the technology can go. It's more enormously powerful,

0:11:49.160 --> 0:11:50.760
<v Speaker 7>we know, and that's why we all work our whole

0:11:50.800 --> 0:11:52.880
<v Speaker 7>lives on it, all of us. We think it can

0:11:52.920 --> 0:11:56.480
<v Speaker 7>being incredible benefits to science and medicine and climate and

0:11:56.600 --> 0:11:59.920
<v Speaker 7>environment and can actually help us and help society face

0:12:00.040 --> 0:12:03.240
<v Speaker 7>of our greatest challenges and solve some of those challenges.

0:12:03.600 --> 0:12:07.120
<v Speaker 7>But you know, in terms of where the technology is

0:12:07.120 --> 0:12:09.040
<v Speaker 7>going to go and the capabilities that will have, there's

0:12:09.040 --> 0:12:11.280
<v Speaker 7>a lot of uncertainty around that, and I think it's good.

0:12:11.280 --> 0:12:15.120
<v Speaker 7>There's disagreement and even amongst the academic fraternity, and that

0:12:15.280 --> 0:12:17.320
<v Speaker 7>just shows you that's why we have to proceed with

0:12:17.400 --> 0:12:19.480
<v Speaker 7>cautious optimism. You know, we want to make sure we

0:12:19.520 --> 0:12:22.080
<v Speaker 7>get the benefits of the innovation and the promise that

0:12:22.120 --> 0:12:26.400
<v Speaker 7>the technology clearly holds. But we've got to be doing

0:12:26.440 --> 0:12:29.280
<v Speaker 7>a responsible way, I would say, using a scientific method,

0:12:29.520 --> 0:12:33.000
<v Speaker 7>trying to have as much foresight on the technology as possible,

0:12:33.080 --> 0:12:36.480
<v Speaker 7>so we predict ahead of time what the unintended consequences

0:12:36.559 --> 0:12:36.800
<v Speaker 7>might be.

0:12:37.120 --> 0:12:39.320
<v Speaker 8>I guess for some it's the emphasis, and the Deputy

0:12:39.320 --> 0:12:42.480
<v Speaker 8>Prime Minister himself, speaking to us earlier, said this is

0:12:42.559 --> 0:12:45.200
<v Speaker 8>very much the summit focused on frontier technology, so the

0:12:45.240 --> 0:12:47.280
<v Speaker 8>next models, the deep mind and others may be going

0:12:47.280 --> 0:12:49.800
<v Speaker 8>out with the next twelve months or so. Others would say, look,

0:12:49.880 --> 0:12:52.040
<v Speaker 8>we need to focus on the more prosaic risks of

0:12:52.080 --> 0:12:54.280
<v Speaker 8>the here and now, the misinformation.

0:12:53.840 --> 0:12:54.679
<v Speaker 1>Data security.

0:12:55.840 --> 0:12:59.280
<v Speaker 8>Those issues are not being given enough weight with the

0:12:59.320 --> 0:13:00.600
<v Speaker 8>critics would say.

0:13:00.400 --> 0:13:02.240
<v Speaker 7>Yeah, I don't agree with that. I mean I think

0:13:02.280 --> 0:13:05.960
<v Speaker 7>that that Actually, even in the summit, there's many sessions

0:13:06.000 --> 0:13:08.000
<v Speaker 7>on the near term Rizz and all of us in

0:13:08.040 --> 0:13:11.400
<v Speaker 7>the frontier labs are also thinking a lot about near

0:13:11.520 --> 0:13:12.960
<v Speaker 7>term harms and how to mitigate those.

0:13:14.840 --> 0:13:17.559
<v Speaker 3>Demss Hassi bis CEO of Google Deep Mind there. Bloomberg's

0:13:17.559 --> 0:13:20.440
<v Speaker 3>Tom McKenzie joins us now from the ground at the

0:13:20.440 --> 0:13:23.720
<v Speaker 3>AI summit, of course, conducted that conversation. It's kind of

0:13:23.760 --> 0:13:27.440
<v Speaker 3>like a who's who in the world of AI. Elon

0:13:27.559 --> 0:13:32.000
<v Speaker 3>Musk is there, right, Tom. But from a political perspective,

0:13:32.600 --> 0:13:35.880
<v Speaker 3>the world's leaders have not turned up. So how much

0:13:35.960 --> 0:13:39.000
<v Speaker 3>is Richie Schunach leaning in on Elon Musk of all

0:13:39.040 --> 0:13:40.560
<v Speaker 3>people being there?

0:13:41.000 --> 0:13:43.280
<v Speaker 8>Well, Elon Musk, certainly. Look a lot of your friends

0:13:43.440 --> 0:13:46.120
<v Speaker 8>and Caroline are on the ground today. Sam Moltman's here,

0:13:46.160 --> 0:13:48.440
<v Speaker 8>of course, have opened AI. Elon Musk is here, Eric

0:13:48.440 --> 0:13:51.360
<v Speaker 8>Schmidt is here. You have deep minds, demsocivists, of course,

0:13:51.440 --> 0:13:53.320
<v Speaker 8>so they already have bought the power lists in terms

0:13:53.320 --> 0:13:56.640
<v Speaker 8>of those driving the innovation within technology. But you're right, Look,

0:13:56.679 --> 0:14:00.000
<v Speaker 8>there's on the edges maybe a little bit of disappointment

0:14:00.200 --> 0:14:02.160
<v Speaker 8>that you don't have the French president here, that you

0:14:02.160 --> 0:14:05.560
<v Speaker 8>don't have the German chancellor, but I will suppress this.

0:14:05.679 --> 0:14:08.120
<v Speaker 8>The UK government, they say, look, we're actually pretty relaxed.

0:14:08.120 --> 0:14:10.760
<v Speaker 8>You've got vonder lyon the European Commissioned President, You've got

0:14:10.800 --> 0:14:12.680
<v Speaker 8>the Vice President of the United States kind of house

0:14:13.160 --> 0:14:16.280
<v Speaker 8>is here, You've got the Japanese representation, you've got Chinese representation.

0:14:16.360 --> 0:14:19.000
<v Speaker 8>So they would say, look, the leaders are here, and

0:14:19.240 --> 0:14:22.560
<v Speaker 8>crucially those executives are here in al must certainly helps

0:14:22.680 --> 0:14:25.000
<v Speaker 8>the UK and it's kind of pr efforts, certainly, And

0:14:25.000 --> 0:14:26.720
<v Speaker 8>what they have mons achieve is sign off on this

0:14:26.800 --> 0:14:29.600
<v Speaker 8>communic A twenty eight different nations. And that's no mean

0:14:29.640 --> 0:14:32.000
<v Speaker 8>feet right, getting China on board with the US, with

0:14:32.040 --> 0:14:34.200
<v Speaker 8>the UK on signing off on the need to protect

0:14:34.600 --> 0:14:37.040
<v Speaker 8>against what they describe as these catastrophic risks.

0:14:37.640 --> 0:14:40.720
<v Speaker 4>Yeah, and there was much made of China being part

0:14:40.760 --> 0:14:43.720
<v Speaker 4>of this conversation, but it needs to be a global agreement,

0:14:43.760 --> 0:14:46.400
<v Speaker 4>a global narrative. If we're going to have guardrails here, Tom,

0:14:46.680 --> 0:14:48.440
<v Speaker 4>what do you expect to actually be coming out in

0:14:48.560 --> 0:14:52.960
<v Speaker 4>terms of hard regulatory policy? Already We've been hearing from

0:14:52.960 --> 0:14:56.120
<v Speaker 4>the US already enacting in executive order for example.

0:14:57.240 --> 0:14:59.520
<v Speaker 8>Yeah, so you've you've got the Communica, which is a

0:14:59.600 --> 0:15:03.160
<v Speaker 8>consent census around protecting against some of these risks.

0:15:03.200 --> 0:15:04.920
<v Speaker 5>But that's all it is. It's a consensus.

0:15:04.920 --> 0:15:08.600
<v Speaker 8>There's no regulatory concrete action that comes on the back

0:15:08.640 --> 0:15:10.800
<v Speaker 8>of this. They'll be hoping that that follows. In six

0:15:10.840 --> 0:15:13.080
<v Speaker 8>months time, South Korea will host their summit, then six

0:15:13.080 --> 0:15:15.760
<v Speaker 8>months after that it'll be France. But look, you're absolutely right.

0:15:15.760 --> 0:15:17.800
<v Speaker 8>There is a divergent picture when it comes to the

0:15:17.840 --> 0:15:21.320
<v Speaker 8>regulatory response, whether that is the euai AT that they

0:15:21.320 --> 0:15:23.480
<v Speaker 8>hope to put into lawn next year, or the executive

0:15:23.480 --> 0:15:26.800
<v Speaker 8>action of the US or China's own regulatory regime. And

0:15:26.840 --> 0:15:29.560
<v Speaker 8>it's interesting because you speak to certain people like Demis,

0:15:29.800 --> 0:15:33.720
<v Speaker 8>but also Inflection CEO as well, the Inflection AIICO saying, look,

0:15:33.920 --> 0:15:36.200
<v Speaker 8>we need to have kind of a global oversight body

0:15:36.240 --> 0:15:37.800
<v Speaker 8>and others push back on that. We spoke to the

0:15:37.800 --> 0:15:40.440
<v Speaker 8>Senior Vice President and IBM said, that's just not going

0:15:40.520 --> 0:15:41.960
<v Speaker 8>to happen. You're not going to be able to get

0:15:41.960 --> 0:15:45.040
<v Speaker 8>that global consensus. You need to work through the agencies

0:15:45.080 --> 0:15:48.040
<v Speaker 8>that already exist. So look, there are divisions in terms

0:15:48.080 --> 0:15:51.440
<v Speaker 8>of that regulatory framework. How it works the implementation, but

0:15:51.440 --> 0:15:54.680
<v Speaker 8>there are also divisions amongst executives themselves, take executives in

0:15:54.760 --> 0:15:57.440
<v Speaker 8>terms of how you define risks and how you define

0:15:57.800 --> 0:15:59.960
<v Speaker 8>the regulations that are needed to contain some of them.

0:16:00.200 --> 0:16:00.400
<v Speaker 9>RIK.

0:16:00.640 --> 0:16:02.680
<v Speaker 8>So the gap is huge at a time of course,

0:16:02.680 --> 0:16:04.680
<v Speaker 8>when we know the innovation is coming through at a

0:16:04.760 --> 0:16:06.600
<v Speaker 8>very rapid pace, whole load.

0:16:06.480 --> 0:16:08.080
<v Speaker 4>Of so much true to be done. There's a couple

0:16:08.040 --> 0:16:10.280
<v Speaker 4>of more days. Of course, it's today, it is tomorrow,

0:16:10.320 --> 0:16:13.360
<v Speaker 4>and of course it's all important. X discussion going on

0:16:13.720 --> 0:16:16.480
<v Speaker 4>between Enol Musk and Mishi Sunac after the event. Tom

0:16:16.520 --> 0:16:18.680
<v Speaker 4>McKenzie on the ground for us over there in buckingham Shaw.

0:16:18.720 --> 0:16:21.520
<v Speaker 4>We thank him very much for it. Meanwhile, coming up funding,

0:16:21.600 --> 0:16:25.760
<v Speaker 4>an AI scientist, former Google CEO actually is in the

0:16:25.840 --> 0:16:27.520
<v Speaker 4>UK at the moment. He's also been lending a hand

0:16:27.560 --> 0:16:30.280
<v Speaker 4>to a nonprofit with ambitious plans to build an aisystem

0:16:30.320 --> 0:16:33.360
<v Speaker 4>capable of scientific research. We have more on that next.

0:16:33.520 --> 0:16:34.080
<v Speaker 5>Ed, what's you got?

0:16:34.840 --> 0:16:37.000
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, just a real quick look at shares of Wayfair,

0:16:37.040 --> 0:16:38.920
<v Speaker 3>another one that had been lower and then suddenly book

0:16:39.160 --> 0:16:42.120
<v Speaker 3>Off it goes higher, up five percent, and lists really

0:16:42.160 --> 0:16:44.840
<v Speaker 3>impressed with the profitability in the e commerce context. In

0:16:44.880 --> 0:16:48.640
<v Speaker 3>the fintech context, with this stock up five point four percent.

0:16:48.720 --> 0:17:08.239
<v Speaker 3>This has been bog technology. Here's talking tech first Up.

0:17:08.280 --> 0:17:11.160
<v Speaker 3>We Work shares slumping by as much as fifty percent

0:17:11.240 --> 0:17:14.160
<v Speaker 3>today after a Wall Street Journal report about its plans

0:17:14.400 --> 0:17:17.240
<v Speaker 3>to file for bankruptcy. A spokesperson for the company said

0:17:17.440 --> 0:17:22.200
<v Speaker 3>it would quote not comment on speculation and interest. Internet

0:17:22.200 --> 0:17:25.479
<v Speaker 3>companies in Southeast Asia, like seeing Grabber, facing their slowest

0:17:25.480 --> 0:17:29.399
<v Speaker 3>growth in years. Researchers say online spending is expected to

0:17:29.480 --> 0:17:32.119
<v Speaker 3>rise by eleven percent this year, but down from twenty

0:17:32.119 --> 0:17:34.760
<v Speaker 3>percent a year earlier, in its lowest rate going back

0:17:34.800 --> 0:17:37.320
<v Speaker 3>to twenty seventeen. This comes as consumers in the region

0:17:37.600 --> 0:17:40.639
<v Speaker 3>pull back on their spending. Plus, new emails shown in

0:17:40.680 --> 0:17:44.400
<v Speaker 3>the DOJ lawsuit against Google are shedding new light about

0:17:44.400 --> 0:17:48.200
<v Speaker 3>the blurry line between search and advertising. In twenty nineteen,

0:17:48.600 --> 0:17:51.800
<v Speaker 3>the former head of Google Search raised concerns that his

0:17:52.000 --> 0:17:55.520
<v Speaker 3>team was quote getting too involved with ads. After Google

0:17:55.720 --> 0:18:00.600
<v Speaker 3>internally declared a code yellow amid revenue concern, speculators world

0:18:00.800 --> 0:18:03.560
<v Speaker 3>that its search team has sometimes been pulled into the

0:18:03.600 --> 0:18:06.879
<v Speaker 3>advertising side of the business. Google has pushed back on

0:18:06.960 --> 0:18:08.200
<v Speaker 3>that very IDEA.

0:18:07.960 --> 0:18:10.840
<v Speaker 4>Caroline Now, speaking of Google, the former CEO of that

0:18:10.960 --> 0:18:13.600
<v Speaker 4>business Searchmith, but he's mentioned further into the non profit

0:18:13.640 --> 0:18:16.959
<v Speaker 4>space by lending his funds his expertise to an AIPAD

0:18:17.000 --> 0:18:20.760
<v Speaker 4>research initiative called Future House, who mergs Jacki Davilas joins

0:18:20.840 --> 0:18:23.560
<v Speaker 4>us in Washington with a great story all about Basically,

0:18:24.080 --> 0:18:28.040
<v Speaker 4>they're assuming that the scientific process in and of itself

0:18:28.480 --> 0:18:31.080
<v Speaker 4>needs to be accelerated by AI, not just the actual

0:18:31.119 --> 0:18:34.000
<v Speaker 4>finding of scientific breakthroughs, that's very Caroline.

0:18:34.280 --> 0:18:37.199
<v Speaker 10>What Future House really wants to do here is not

0:18:37.760 --> 0:18:43.400
<v Speaker 10>just advanced breakthroughs like the alpha fold protein folding breakthrough

0:18:43.440 --> 0:18:45.320
<v Speaker 10>that we saw in the last couple of years that

0:18:45.400 --> 0:18:49.760
<v Speaker 10>really cracked open AI's potential in science. What Future House

0:18:49.760 --> 0:18:53.480
<v Speaker 10>wants to do is actually advanced the process itself. Now,

0:18:53.840 --> 0:18:55.400
<v Speaker 10>a lot of us kind of have to go back

0:18:55.440 --> 0:18:58.439
<v Speaker 10>to that high school, you know, laboratory where we were

0:18:58.480 --> 0:19:01.640
<v Speaker 10>learning about how to create a hyphe doing the research,

0:19:01.680 --> 0:19:04.280
<v Speaker 10>and then ultimately testing that. But there's a lot of

0:19:04.359 --> 0:19:07.640
<v Speaker 10>bottlenecks here that Future House says they can solve, starting

0:19:07.680 --> 0:19:11.439
<v Speaker 10>with the ability to make new hypotheses at a greater

0:19:11.560 --> 0:19:15.000
<v Speaker 10>scale and much faster, perhaps more accurate than humans can.

0:19:15.280 --> 0:19:16.840
<v Speaker 10>And the way they want to do that is with

0:19:16.920 --> 0:19:19.479
<v Speaker 10>this AI scientist, So they plan to kind of build

0:19:19.760 --> 0:19:23.440
<v Speaker 10>their own AI system that can ingest thousands and thousands

0:19:23.480 --> 0:19:26.160
<v Speaker 10>of papers at a much bigger scale than a human

0:19:26.200 --> 0:19:30.479
<v Speaker 10>scientist can, and eventually start to semi autonomously come up

0:19:30.480 --> 0:19:31.800
<v Speaker 10>with hypotheses of its own.

0:19:31.960 --> 0:19:34.040
<v Speaker 3>What's interesting about this story is there are loads of

0:19:34.080 --> 0:19:37.320
<v Speaker 3>startups and big companies working on applying AI and the

0:19:37.400 --> 0:19:41.000
<v Speaker 3>sciences by technology farmer drug discovery. This is a non

0:19:41.119 --> 0:19:44.639
<v Speaker 3>profit and it's focused in academia. Tell us who the

0:19:44.680 --> 0:19:46.280
<v Speaker 3>people are behind Future House.

0:19:46.160 --> 0:19:49.560
<v Speaker 10>Jackie that was by design ed Now, of course, Eric

0:19:49.600 --> 0:19:53.320
<v Speaker 10>Schmidt is by far the largest backer here. The organization

0:19:53.440 --> 0:19:55.360
<v Speaker 10>plans to have is backing for at least the first

0:19:55.440 --> 0:19:59.440
<v Speaker 10>five years. It expects to spend about twenty million dollars

0:19:59.480 --> 0:20:02.000
<v Speaker 10>in the next her up until next and a lot

0:20:02.000 --> 0:20:04.760
<v Speaker 10>of that funding is going to go to talent and

0:20:04.800 --> 0:20:08.159
<v Speaker 10>building what's called a wet laboratory, much like what we

0:20:08.200 --> 0:20:10.720
<v Speaker 10>would see in an academic institution or even some of

0:20:10.760 --> 0:20:14.320
<v Speaker 10>these industry led research labs. But the reason it's a

0:20:14.359 --> 0:20:16.880
<v Speaker 10>nonprofit is because it doesn't want to have the pressure

0:20:17.080 --> 0:20:19.880
<v Speaker 10>to make money or pump out products, and so that's

0:20:19.920 --> 0:20:22.840
<v Speaker 10>where you have Eric Schmidt saying he wants the incentives

0:20:22.880 --> 0:20:26.960
<v Speaker 10>really aligned to advance the research itself, not having its

0:20:27.000 --> 0:20:30.840
<v Speaker 10>attention diverted by you know, other priorities that perhaps might

0:20:30.880 --> 0:20:32.840
<v Speaker 10>come from investors or the market itself.

0:20:33.000 --> 0:20:35.560
<v Speaker 5>All Right, thanks to Bloombox. Jackie Dablos out in DC.

0:20:35.760 --> 0:20:44.800
<v Speaker 4>Then welcome back to blom meg Technology.

0:20:44.800 --> 0:20:47.240
<v Speaker 3>I'm Caroline Heard in New York and I'm ed Ludlow

0:20:47.280 --> 0:20:49.959
<v Speaker 3>in San Francisco. A quick check in on European markets.

0:20:49.960 --> 0:20:52.080
<v Speaker 3>The equities market in Europe has just closed.

0:20:52.160 --> 0:20:52.960
<v Speaker 5>The stock six.

0:20:52.800 --> 0:20:55.600
<v Speaker 3>Hundred Europe, which is kind of this continent wide gauge

0:20:55.600 --> 0:20:58.159
<v Speaker 3>of equities up for a third straight day seven ten

0:20:58.200 --> 0:21:00.199
<v Speaker 3>to one percent. A lot of the trading that's going

0:21:00.200 --> 0:21:02.399
<v Speaker 3>on in Europe, or did go on in Europe throughout

0:21:02.400 --> 0:21:05.159
<v Speaker 3>Wednesday session was kind of ahead of the Fed, a

0:21:05.240 --> 0:21:08.840
<v Speaker 3>drum beat to and treading water towards this afternoon's FED decision,

0:21:08.880 --> 0:21:11.800
<v Speaker 3>because of course Fed and rates policy has an impact

0:21:11.840 --> 0:21:14.000
<v Speaker 3>on the global economy. But there was also some pulled

0:21:14.040 --> 0:21:16.119
<v Speaker 3>back in some of the sort of benchmark European yields.

0:21:16.119 --> 0:21:18.520
<v Speaker 3>We're looking at the German ten year burned two point

0:21:18.720 --> 0:21:21.320
<v Speaker 3>seventy five percent on its yield, and euro dollar slipping

0:21:21.359 --> 0:21:23.920
<v Speaker 3>for a euro against the dollar for a second straight day.

0:21:23.920 --> 0:21:25.320
<v Speaker 5>Remember for one week only.

0:21:25.359 --> 0:21:27.480
<v Speaker 3>We're checking in on these European markets because of the

0:21:27.480 --> 0:21:30.040
<v Speaker 3>time difference and how exciting it is, Caroline, and.

0:21:30.040 --> 0:21:33.280
<v Speaker 4>Indeed it is all kind of dictated by US macro policy.

0:21:33.359 --> 0:21:35.320
<v Speaker 4>Let's dig in on what's happening in the US markets

0:21:35.400 --> 0:21:38.440
<v Speaker 4>right now. We are up wells seven tenser percent, let's

0:21:38.440 --> 0:21:40.960
<v Speaker 4>call it on the Nastak one hundred. Interesting desire to

0:21:40.960 --> 0:21:43.680
<v Speaker 4>be getting into technology names on a day where perhaps

0:21:43.680 --> 0:21:46.960
<v Speaker 4>we had some mixed data coming out from the US.

0:21:47.000 --> 0:21:49.480
<v Speaker 4>I mean, overall, we're trying to be reading the tea

0:21:49.520 --> 0:21:52.160
<v Speaker 4>leaves of what's been disclosed. When it comes to job openings,

0:21:52.200 --> 0:21:56.399
<v Speaker 4>actually climbing, the US factory gauge slumping. Nevertheless, some movement

0:21:56.440 --> 0:21:58.600
<v Speaker 4>towards some of the tech names Bitcoin. On the downside,

0:21:58.680 --> 0:22:01.760
<v Speaker 4>the dollar stays flat, but we do remain at about

0:22:01.760 --> 0:22:04.520
<v Speaker 4>thirty four thousand elevated level US tending yield though. This

0:22:04.560 --> 0:22:07.880
<v Speaker 4>is what to watch while markets rallying twelve basis points

0:22:07.920 --> 0:22:10.119
<v Speaker 4>to the downside. This is the Treasury said it will

0:22:10.119 --> 0:22:12.600
<v Speaker 4>sell one hundred and twelve billion dollars in longer term securities,

0:22:12.680 --> 0:22:15.560
<v Speaker 4>actually sort of slowing that growth of issuance. But notably,

0:22:15.560 --> 0:22:17.320
<v Speaker 4>we are thinking that the Federal Reserve is going to

0:22:17.320 --> 0:22:20.000
<v Speaker 4>be holding those interest rates steady and a twenty two

0:22:20.240 --> 0:22:23.240
<v Speaker 4>year high. Of course in their meeting today, maybe they

0:22:23.280 --> 0:22:25.959
<v Speaker 4>could hike later in the year. What does that policy

0:22:26.040 --> 0:22:28.520
<v Speaker 4>mean for sort of hearts and minds in terms of

0:22:28.600 --> 0:22:31.399
<v Speaker 4>allocating capital, tools, technology names in private sector and the

0:22:31.400 --> 0:22:34.360
<v Speaker 4>public sector. We want to discuss the FED conversation. It's implication,

0:22:34.480 --> 0:22:36.560
<v Speaker 4>but again for AI investors and how should they be

0:22:36.640 --> 0:22:39.240
<v Speaker 4>thinking about monetary policy. And pleased to say, Joe Chow's

0:22:39.280 --> 0:22:41.040
<v Speaker 4>with us. He's the co founder and managing partner over

0:22:41.040 --> 0:22:43.879
<v Speaker 4>at Millennia Capital, and someone who worked with the FED

0:22:44.320 --> 0:22:47.760
<v Speaker 4>knows how to think about the implications of valuations of companies.

0:22:48.119 --> 0:22:50.560
<v Speaker 4>And you actually think, look, this AI, some call it

0:22:50.600 --> 0:22:52.520
<v Speaker 4>a mini bubble, is not a bubble if you're looking

0:22:52.520 --> 0:22:54.400
<v Speaker 4>at where interest rates ultimately.

0:22:53.920 --> 0:22:57.720
<v Speaker 11>Are exactly and in our view the AI super second

0:22:57.760 --> 0:23:00.439
<v Speaker 11>which just starting this year, this is year one, and

0:23:00.520 --> 0:23:02.680
<v Speaker 11>that the bubble is not going to peak or burst

0:23:02.720 --> 0:23:04.600
<v Speaker 11>for like the ten years in Nerview. There's a couple

0:23:04.600 --> 0:23:07.080
<v Speaker 11>of reasons for why. If you look at historical tech

0:23:07.080 --> 0:23:09.400
<v Speaker 11>bubbles like the crypto we had ten to twelve years

0:23:09.440 --> 0:23:12.080
<v Speaker 11>of loose monster policy, and in two thousand and one

0:23:12.119 --> 0:23:14.640
<v Speaker 11>when the dotcom bubble burst it we had ten years

0:23:14.640 --> 0:23:18.320
<v Speaker 11>of fiscal policy fiscal surplus. So usually these tech bubbles,

0:23:18.359 --> 0:23:20.840
<v Speaker 11>InnoVision bubbles tend to form when you have one of

0:23:20.840 --> 0:23:26.760
<v Speaker 11>these following conditions. Loose Mountter policy, strong markets. We're strong economy,

0:23:26.840 --> 0:23:29.880
<v Speaker 11>and in twenty twenty three we have anything but that

0:23:30.040 --> 0:23:33.240
<v Speaker 11>we have time Mountter policy. With QT we have a

0:23:33.320 --> 0:23:36.040
<v Speaker 11>very difficult market. And my point is, if AI has

0:23:36.119 --> 0:23:40.400
<v Speaker 11>been this bigger important, then imagine when the FEN normalizes

0:23:40.560 --> 0:23:44.199
<v Speaker 11>and when the markets kind of resume, then that how

0:23:44.240 --> 0:23:45.639
<v Speaker 11>big AA bubble could become.

0:23:46.320 --> 0:23:48.720
<v Speaker 4>I'm interested. You're obviously backing some of the key names

0:23:48.720 --> 0:23:50.399
<v Speaker 4>that we talked a lot about on the show, the

0:23:50.440 --> 0:23:53.200
<v Speaker 4>coheres of this world, the stability AIS, and there's some

0:23:53.240 --> 0:23:55.639
<v Speaker 4>management concerns with that business. I'm interesting now one a

0:23:55.720 --> 0:23:58.520
<v Speaker 4>day where we see Olive AI, for example, once worth

0:23:58.760 --> 0:24:01.040
<v Speaker 4>four billion dollars valuation in twenty twenty one when it

0:24:01.119 --> 0:24:03.760
<v Speaker 4>last raised some funds and now it basically sales off

0:24:03.800 --> 0:24:06.119
<v Speaker 4>folts of the business and has to fold. What is

0:24:06.119 --> 0:24:09.040
<v Speaker 4>this distinguishing factor between companies that can't make it through

0:24:09.440 --> 0:24:10.440
<v Speaker 4>and companies that can.

0:24:11.040 --> 0:24:13.280
<v Speaker 11>Yeah, So you know, I've been having these conversations with

0:24:13.320 --> 0:24:15.800
<v Speaker 11>a lot of investors and founders. So basically I've been

0:24:15.840 --> 0:24:19.440
<v Speaker 11>asked what is AI, and I said, AI is software squared.

0:24:19.880 --> 0:24:23.440
<v Speaker 11>Think about how big impact internet and software have had

0:24:23.440 --> 0:24:26.159
<v Speaker 11>on our lives, business and consumer lives as can be

0:24:26.440 --> 0:24:28.879
<v Speaker 11>much much bigger. So by the same token you can

0:24:29.080 --> 0:24:31.480
<v Speaker 11>you can you can value a software company on a

0:24:31.600 --> 0:24:35.000
<v Speaker 11>price to revenue, on a price to growth profit e

0:24:35.040 --> 0:24:37.360
<v Speaker 11>bit of free cash to LTV CACT and all these

0:24:37.359 --> 0:24:40.359
<v Speaker 11>operating metrics. You would value an AI company by the

0:24:40.359 --> 0:24:43.119
<v Speaker 11>same token, and you would value kind of like the

0:24:43.160 --> 0:24:45.960
<v Speaker 11>company based on long term DCF and so yes, some

0:24:46.000 --> 0:24:49.560
<v Speaker 11>of these AI companies are overvalued, but that's because they're

0:24:49.600 --> 0:24:52.639
<v Speaker 11>growing fast, so the growth rate price the earnings earnings

0:24:52.680 --> 0:24:56.920
<v Speaker 11>growth or revene growth is justified, or because the total

0:24:56.960 --> 0:24:59.880
<v Speaker 11>addressing market is big, or there's such a strong mode.

0:25:00.160 --> 0:25:02.000
<v Speaker 11>So some of the companies that you know are not

0:25:02.160 --> 0:25:05.320
<v Speaker 11>sustainable may not exemplify one of those our characteristics.

0:25:05.440 --> 0:25:07.879
<v Speaker 3>Joe, Caroline and I were reflecting this morning on a

0:25:07.960 --> 0:25:10.119
<v Speaker 3>conversation we kind of had throughout the year, but it

0:25:10.240 --> 0:25:14.680
<v Speaker 3>started within a COSTLA that ninety percent of these new startups.

0:25:14.720 --> 0:25:16.760
<v Speaker 3>In other words, ones that were founded this year in

0:25:16.800 --> 0:25:20.199
<v Speaker 3>the AI domain won't survive. But I kind of like

0:25:21.040 --> 0:25:23.879
<v Speaker 3>it's a conversation that I've always had covering bench capital. Right,

0:25:23.920 --> 0:25:26.680
<v Speaker 3>you look at your portfolio, aren't ninety percent of they're

0:25:26.680 --> 0:25:27.840
<v Speaker 3>not going to make it anyway?

0:25:29.200 --> 0:25:31.800
<v Speaker 11>That's the power leventry capital is not every company is

0:25:31.840 --> 0:25:33.760
<v Speaker 11>going to make it. But when I take a step

0:25:33.760 --> 0:25:35.960
<v Speaker 11>back and I work at the ecosystem, you know, I'm

0:25:36.000 --> 0:25:39.840
<v Speaker 11>really really excited about this juncture where AI has really

0:25:39.880 --> 0:25:42.960
<v Speaker 11>introduced a lot of life back back into the ecosystem,

0:25:43.080 --> 0:25:45.560
<v Speaker 11>where AI has created this whole new green field in

0:25:45.560 --> 0:25:48.360
<v Speaker 11>which many new companies will be born and there will

0:25:48.359 --> 0:25:51.480
<v Speaker 11>be many useful applications LBW built in cancer research, in

0:25:51.520 --> 0:25:55.639
<v Speaker 11>healthcare services and et cetera. And so not every company

0:25:55.680 --> 0:25:57.439
<v Speaker 11>is going to make it where the ones. But you know,

0:25:57.640 --> 0:25:59.919
<v Speaker 11>I compare this twenty twenty three moments. It's sort of

0:26:00.000 --> 0:26:02.600
<v Speaker 11>where we were in twenty ten for the cloud, and

0:26:02.640 --> 0:26:04.600
<v Speaker 11>twenty ten was when we were coming out of the GFC,

0:26:04.680 --> 0:26:07.119
<v Speaker 11>when markets were recovering, and maybe the.

0:26:07.119 --> 0:26:07.920
<v Speaker 5>Two thousand and two moment.

0:26:07.960 --> 0:26:11.080
<v Speaker 11>And so the companies that do that will stay, that

0:26:11.119 --> 0:26:13.640
<v Speaker 11>will survive this sort of kind of wash out our

0:26:13.720 --> 0:26:16.320
<v Speaker 11>poise to stay and you're seeing some of the most

0:26:16.359 --> 0:26:19.080
<v Speaker 11>impressive growth numbers from open AI, from n RAPPID, from cohere,

0:26:19.480 --> 0:26:22.119
<v Speaker 11>and we're really confident to say that the aida markets

0:26:22.119 --> 0:26:24.119
<v Speaker 11>are to stay and that it's going to have a

0:26:24.200 --> 0:26:26.280
<v Speaker 11>huge impact on our business consumer lives.

0:26:26.960 --> 0:26:28.960
<v Speaker 3>There's been a debate this week about what's going to

0:26:28.960 --> 0:26:32.439
<v Speaker 3>be bigger for global financial markets, the FED this afternoon

0:26:32.800 --> 0:26:35.440
<v Speaker 3>or Apple earnings on Thursday evening.

0:26:36.480 --> 0:26:37.600
<v Speaker 5>Let's stick with the FED.

0:26:38.240 --> 0:26:40.720
<v Speaker 3>If you are a venture capitalist or you're a long

0:26:40.840 --> 0:26:45.120
<v Speaker 3>term private investor, why do you care about monetary policy?

0:26:45.240 --> 0:26:48.320
<v Speaker 3>Why do you track rates in the direction to travel

0:26:48.359 --> 0:26:48.879
<v Speaker 3>for rates?

0:26:49.320 --> 0:26:52.479
<v Speaker 11>Well, there's two things. One is venture capital assets are

0:26:52.520 --> 0:26:54.679
<v Speaker 11>just equities and that's no different than public equities. It's

0:26:54.720 --> 0:26:57.639
<v Speaker 11>just that public equities trade, you know, move every mill second,

0:26:57.640 --> 0:27:00.119
<v Speaker 11>but venture capital ascess don't move. But if you're you

0:27:00.200 --> 0:27:03.120
<v Speaker 11>see you need to understand where rates are, where discount

0:27:03.200 --> 0:27:06.239
<v Speaker 11>rates are going, and what the exit markets will look like.

0:27:06.400 --> 0:27:09.960
<v Speaker 11>And that's going to impact sort of evaluations your portfolio.

0:27:10.359 --> 0:27:13.920
<v Speaker 11>And the secondly is is you know, let me say

0:27:13.920 --> 0:27:16.280
<v Speaker 11>this now that the FED is done, where you're done

0:27:16.480 --> 0:27:18.439
<v Speaker 11>and you know in my view, the only direction the

0:27:18.480 --> 0:27:20.560
<v Speaker 11>federal funds rate is going to go absent any sort

0:27:20.560 --> 0:27:23.440
<v Speaker 11>of blackswan events in the next few years is downwards.

0:27:23.480 --> 0:27:25.199
<v Speaker 11>You know, when now we're at five point five and

0:27:25.200 --> 0:27:28.000
<v Speaker 11>a little bit higher, you know, absent you know, blackswan events,

0:27:28.040 --> 0:27:29.680
<v Speaker 11>the federal funds rate will kind of go down from

0:27:29.720 --> 0:27:31.400
<v Speaker 11>five to five and a half, maybe three to four percent,

0:27:31.440 --> 0:27:34.399
<v Speaker 11>maybe maybe two percent, And so we're discount rates to

0:27:34.760 --> 0:27:38.320
<v Speaker 11>kind of compress by twenty pips points twenty pips. That's

0:27:38.359 --> 0:27:42.240
<v Speaker 11>going to leave to equity valuation expansion, and that's going

0:27:42.240 --> 0:27:45.560
<v Speaker 11>to be a healthy movement for the public markets in

0:27:45.560 --> 0:27:48.440
<v Speaker 11>tech and private markets and comparables. So you know, that's

0:27:48.440 --> 0:27:50.360
<v Speaker 11>why we're really decided about this juncture is the FA's

0:27:50.359 --> 0:27:53.520
<v Speaker 11>almost done, we're starting a new business cycle, and AI

0:27:53.600 --> 0:27:56.119
<v Speaker 11>is really introduced a lot of new activities in the market,

0:27:56.800 --> 0:27:58.719
<v Speaker 11>and so this may be actually want to be one

0:27:58.720 --> 0:27:59.920
<v Speaker 11>of the best comet to invest in AI.

0:28:00.119 --> 0:28:02.560
<v Speaker 3>That is an answer that I think Caroline addresses a

0:28:02.600 --> 0:28:04.960
<v Speaker 3>lot of the questions that are global technology. Audience has

0:28:05.000 --> 0:28:07.680
<v Speaker 3>Joe Chow and Leniar Capital. Great to ab back on

0:28:07.720 --> 0:28:10.320
<v Speaker 3>Bloomberg Technology. Thank you coming up here on the show

0:28:10.320 --> 0:28:13.760
<v Speaker 3>will continue the conversation on AI and talk regulation and

0:28:13.880 --> 0:28:16.720
<v Speaker 3>investment in the space. That's the next conversation, Caro.

0:28:16.960 --> 0:28:19.480
<v Speaker 4>Meanwhile, let's talk about desire to be spending money on

0:28:19.600 --> 0:28:23.080
<v Speaker 4>big deals. Some news crossing the wire that will endeavor.

0:28:23.359 --> 0:28:25.840
<v Speaker 4>You know, the company of talent agency and behind an

0:28:25.880 --> 0:28:28.520
<v Speaker 4>ultimate fighting champion as well, but a private equity firm,

0:28:28.560 --> 0:28:30.320
<v Speaker 4>silver Lake, is turning to its closest partner in the

0:28:30.320 --> 0:28:32.680
<v Speaker 4>Middle East to back one of its own largest ever

0:28:32.800 --> 0:28:35.480
<v Speaker 4>buyout deal proposals. The pfirm is and talks to team

0:28:35.600 --> 0:28:38.719
<v Speaker 4>with Abu Dab's well Fun Mumbadulla in a potential takeover

0:28:38.760 --> 0:28:40.760
<v Speaker 4>of Endeavor. Just check out the shares popping two and

0:28:40.800 --> 0:28:43.280
<v Speaker 4>a half percent Endeavor so far. Not commenting this is

0:28:43.320 --> 0:29:01.920
<v Speaker 4>bloombog technology Now. Business officials told a Senate panel on

0:29:02.080 --> 0:29:05.040
<v Speaker 4>artificial intelligence that Congress must take a more active role

0:29:05.080 --> 0:29:07.600
<v Speaker 4>in regulating the use of AI, particularly in the workplace,

0:29:07.920 --> 0:29:10.080
<v Speaker 4>so more and how the technology is impacting the workforce.

0:29:10.120 --> 0:29:12.200
<v Speaker 4>That's just bring in Bloombergs to a Constancy's got a

0:29:12.200 --> 0:29:15.040
<v Speaker 4>great story reading on at the moment. The myriad of

0:29:15.400 --> 0:29:18.240
<v Speaker 4>state by state, region by region rules that are coming in.

0:29:18.280 --> 0:29:20.239
<v Speaker 4>I think of here in New York in particular, but

0:29:20.320 --> 0:29:22.800
<v Speaker 4>nothing from a federal level that's protecting the worker, right.

0:29:23.280 --> 0:29:27.000
<v Speaker 9>Right, So, and that's what these these folks from the

0:29:27.040 --> 0:29:29.920
<v Speaker 9>business community were really calling for, because if you have

0:29:30.040 --> 0:29:33.959
<v Speaker 9>this patchwork of local and state regulations, it can make

0:29:34.000 --> 0:29:38.280
<v Speaker 9>it really difficult for companies who are developing new technologies

0:29:38.360 --> 0:29:40.600
<v Speaker 9>to figure out how to how to even proceed. So

0:29:40.960 --> 0:29:44.480
<v Speaker 9>some some folks were calling for federal action on this,

0:29:44.640 --> 0:29:47.480
<v Speaker 9>on this in particular, looking at AI and hiring. I

0:29:47.480 --> 0:29:49.560
<v Speaker 9>think that's a big one. And as you mentioned, there's

0:29:49.560 --> 0:29:53.560
<v Speaker 9>a New York City law looking at bias in AI

0:29:54.480 --> 0:29:59.800
<v Speaker 9>software that you know, in order to regulate those sorts

0:29:59.840 --> 0:30:02.800
<v Speaker 9>of of programs being used for employment decisions.

0:30:02.960 --> 0:30:06.240
<v Speaker 4>Now there in comes the ongoing issue with regulation and

0:30:06.280 --> 0:30:09.240
<v Speaker 4>new technology, which is do you stifle innovation? How much

0:30:09.280 --> 0:30:11.640
<v Speaker 4>you're seeing this put in the push being discussed at

0:30:11.680 --> 0:30:12.600
<v Speaker 4>a Congress.

0:30:12.280 --> 0:30:14.680
<v Speaker 9>Level, Yeah, so that was a big part of the

0:30:14.720 --> 0:30:16.720
<v Speaker 9>conversation at the hearing yesterday.

0:30:17.360 --> 0:30:18.880
<v Speaker 6>And I think that.

0:30:18.800 --> 0:30:21.600
<v Speaker 9>There are you know, it's it's really tough for lawmakers

0:30:21.640 --> 0:30:23.680
<v Speaker 9>to figure out how to proceed here because I think

0:30:23.680 --> 0:30:27.239
<v Speaker 9>that there are, you know, arguments on both sides that

0:30:28.400 --> 0:30:31.120
<v Speaker 9>you know, on one side, folks say that you know,

0:30:31.240 --> 0:30:34.720
<v Speaker 9>AI has holds a lot of risk for workers and

0:30:34.960 --> 0:30:38.880
<v Speaker 9>may even result in displacement of people's jobs on a

0:30:38.960 --> 0:30:41.640
<v Speaker 9>large scale. And then on the other side, people say

0:30:41.800 --> 0:30:43.959
<v Speaker 9>that's really not going to happen. You know, we're going

0:30:44.000 --> 0:30:47.080
<v Speaker 9>to see people shifting into new jobs, We're going to

0:30:47.080 --> 0:30:51.080
<v Speaker 9>see people learning new skills, and so it's hard to

0:30:51.160 --> 0:30:54.840
<v Speaker 9>know for Congress at this point in particular, you know,

0:30:55.000 --> 0:30:57.960
<v Speaker 9>how exactly they should proceed, how tightly they should be

0:30:57.960 --> 0:31:01.360
<v Speaker 9>regulating versus letting that companies do their.

0:31:01.200 --> 0:31:04.400
<v Speaker 4>Own thing, the ongoing debate. Joe Constance is great to

0:31:04.400 --> 0:31:06.640
<v Speaker 4>have you, thank you very much indeed on that important story,

0:31:06.640 --> 0:31:08.400
<v Speaker 4>and it's something that's been discussed in the UK right

0:31:08.440 --> 0:31:08.840
<v Speaker 4>now as well.

0:31:08.880 --> 0:31:11.840
<v Speaker 3>In it is and that's the topic of discussion in

0:31:11.840 --> 0:31:14.880
<v Speaker 3>today's VC Spotlight. We're going to hone in on investing

0:31:14.880 --> 0:31:17.640
<v Speaker 3>in art official intelligence, but with the context that right

0:31:17.640 --> 0:31:20.160
<v Speaker 3>now in the United Kingdom there is an AI summit

0:31:20.240 --> 0:31:23.280
<v Speaker 3>underway joining us. James Wise, a partner at Borders and

0:31:23.400 --> 0:31:26.800
<v Speaker 3>Capital big presence in the UK and Europe. Ben what

0:31:26.920 --> 0:31:29.720
<v Speaker 3>does the summit like this actually mean, James, for the

0:31:29.800 --> 0:31:33.600
<v Speaker 3>ecosystem of startups working on AI in the UK. In particular,

0:31:33.880 --> 0:31:37.480
<v Speaker 3>is there any actually tangible action that will come in

0:31:37.520 --> 0:31:38.800
<v Speaker 3>supporting that industry.

0:31:38.960 --> 0:31:40.760
<v Speaker 1>Well, overall it's a very positive thing, right.

0:31:40.800 --> 0:31:43.520
<v Speaker 2>We want to see international collaboration, we want to see

0:31:43.600 --> 0:31:48.000
<v Speaker 2>regulation that's clear and forward thinking. But obviously our aperature

0:31:48.000 --> 0:31:50.560
<v Speaker 2>here is really how is this going to affect entrepreneurs

0:31:50.600 --> 0:31:53.000
<v Speaker 2>on a day to day basis coming into the market

0:31:53.040 --> 0:31:54.880
<v Speaker 2>and their ability to raise capital.

0:31:55.200 --> 0:31:57.520
<v Speaker 1>And what we're looking at is how will.

0:31:57.400 --> 0:32:00.640
<v Speaker 2>Regulation of models or access to the tools open source

0:32:00.680 --> 0:32:04.240
<v Speaker 2>solutions affect the desire of entrepreneurs to try innovating in

0:32:04.240 --> 0:32:07.360
<v Speaker 2>this space and the ability of investors to really make

0:32:07.360 --> 0:32:09.200
<v Speaker 2>a difference and help build big businesses.

0:32:09.200 --> 0:32:14.280
<v Speaker 3>Here, what this summit has done is literally put in

0:32:14.280 --> 0:32:17.440
<v Speaker 3>front of the camera the talent in the UK, you know,

0:32:17.920 --> 0:32:21.640
<v Speaker 3>deep mind being the obvious example. Are there any particular

0:32:21.680 --> 0:32:25.200
<v Speaker 3>advantages or strengths that you feel the UK has in

0:32:25.240 --> 0:32:27.960
<v Speaker 3>the field of artificial intelligence, be it academic or be

0:32:28.040 --> 0:32:29.040
<v Speaker 3>it the private sector.

0:32:30.200 --> 0:32:33.479
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, that we have a broad range of software successes right,

0:32:33.480 --> 0:32:37.240
<v Speaker 2>whether it's in fintech, or it's in detech or even

0:32:37.320 --> 0:32:39.920
<v Speaker 2>in the life sciences. And actually what we're seeing is

0:32:40.080 --> 0:32:44.520
<v Speaker 2>research and AI now proliferating through inter industrial applications and

0:32:44.560 --> 0:32:47.120
<v Speaker 2>being taken up by leading software businesses to make a

0:32:47.120 --> 0:32:47.640
<v Speaker 2>difference for.

0:32:47.680 --> 0:32:49.600
<v Speaker 1>Users and ultimately that's what matters.

0:32:49.880 --> 0:32:52.760
<v Speaker 2>Having people here is fantastic, but making sure that they

0:32:52.800 --> 0:32:54.480
<v Speaker 2>work on an international level is still.

0:32:54.280 --> 0:32:55.080
<v Speaker 1>Going to be important.

0:32:55.280 --> 0:32:57.320
<v Speaker 2>You know, the UK is a great market, but when

0:32:57.360 --> 0:32:59.720
<v Speaker 2>we invest in businesses here, we're not investing in UK

0:32:59.760 --> 0:33:02.080
<v Speaker 2>business to win in the UK. We want them to

0:33:02.080 --> 0:33:04.880
<v Speaker 2>be impactful on the global scale, and that's why having

0:33:04.920 --> 0:33:08.880
<v Speaker 2>something like the Global AI Safety Summit is incredibly beneficial.

0:33:09.160 --> 0:33:12.600
<v Speaker 4>It's interesting, of course, summary investments include Writer and we've

0:33:12.640 --> 0:33:16.600
<v Speaker 4>interviewed founder of that business who's permanently jetting across from

0:33:16.680 --> 0:33:20.480
<v Speaker 4>London to SF and back building a global AI business.

0:33:20.560 --> 0:33:23.000
<v Speaker 4>One of valuations like James in the UK, because we're

0:33:23.000 --> 0:33:25.080
<v Speaker 4>just talking about how they're pretty elevated here in the US.

0:33:25.240 --> 0:33:27.880
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, well, look, the amount of money from venture investors

0:33:27.920 --> 0:33:30.479
<v Speaker 2>going into AI has grown significantly in the UK over

0:33:30.440 --> 0:33:32.840
<v Speaker 2>the last year. It's grown by about seventy percent. AI

0:33:32.880 --> 0:33:35.360
<v Speaker 2>has now just overtaken fintech this year in terms of

0:33:35.360 --> 0:33:38.320
<v Speaker 2>the main area that vcs are putting dollars, and obviously

0:33:38.360 --> 0:33:41.560
<v Speaker 2>that creates competition and it drives up valuations for early

0:33:41.560 --> 0:33:45.160
<v Speaker 2>stage investments. I think what's different about AI investing right

0:33:45.200 --> 0:33:49.120
<v Speaker 2>now versus some software valuations driven maybe a couple of

0:33:49.200 --> 0:33:52.240
<v Speaker 2>years ago, is that revenues are really following right There

0:33:52.280 --> 0:33:55.440
<v Speaker 2>is incredible demand both at the enterprise level and at

0:33:55.440 --> 0:33:58.440
<v Speaker 2>the consumer level for these new tools. Now we need

0:33:58.480 --> 0:34:01.200
<v Speaker 2>to make sure that demand convert into usage and that

0:34:01.320 --> 0:34:03.640
<v Speaker 2>people really get benefit out of it. But a lot

0:34:03.680 --> 0:34:06.480
<v Speaker 2>of the high valuations you're seeing are actually underpinned by

0:34:06.760 --> 0:34:08.080
<v Speaker 2>very fast growing revenues.

0:34:08.880 --> 0:34:11.839
<v Speaker 4>I put to you a question that we just had

0:34:11.880 --> 0:34:14.880
<v Speaker 4>a chat with Joe Chaw about, and there's one company,

0:34:14.920 --> 0:34:16.279
<v Speaker 4>for example. We're starting to get a view of these

0:34:16.320 --> 0:34:19.719
<v Speaker 4>companies actually failing now. We had Olive AI, one of

0:34:19.719 --> 0:34:22.040
<v Speaker 4>these companies that was worth four billion back in twenty

0:34:22.040 --> 0:34:23.680
<v Speaker 4>twenty one and is now selling off parts of the

0:34:23.680 --> 0:34:27.400
<v Speaker 4>business and basically unwinding. How do you discern a mote?

0:34:27.560 --> 0:34:29.719
<v Speaker 4>How do you decide which company is the one that's

0:34:29.760 --> 0:34:32.200
<v Speaker 4>going to be able to push through when a lot

0:34:32.239 --> 0:34:35.520
<v Speaker 4>of the firepowerin AI is costly and ends up being

0:34:35.560 --> 0:34:38.000
<v Speaker 4>owned by some of the big oligopolies. Shall we say?

0:34:38.320 --> 0:34:38.520
<v Speaker 5>Yeah?

0:34:38.520 --> 0:34:40.480
<v Speaker 1>And AI is an incredibly broad term, right.

0:34:40.520 --> 0:34:42.640
<v Speaker 2>What we've seen over the last year is an explosion

0:34:42.640 --> 0:34:45.600
<v Speaker 2>in the capabilities of generative AI, and in fact that's

0:34:45.640 --> 0:34:48.440
<v Speaker 2>completely ruined the business models of some businesses that were

0:34:48.440 --> 0:34:51.640
<v Speaker 2>building their own models at scale, and so there's going

0:34:51.719 --> 0:34:53.440
<v Speaker 2>to be disruption, there will be failures.

0:34:53.680 --> 0:34:53.840
<v Speaker 7>You know.

0:34:53.920 --> 0:34:55.880
<v Speaker 2>What we're looking for right now in a period of

0:34:56.040 --> 0:34:59.760
<v Speaker 2>very fast technical change and innovation are founders and product

0:34:59.760 --> 0:35:02.359
<v Speaker 2>team so who can adapt and deploy these new technologies

0:35:02.600 --> 0:35:05.040
<v Speaker 2>to find ways to really bring the value for the customers.

0:35:05.239 --> 0:35:07.360
<v Speaker 2>You know, I think you did a great summary earlier

0:35:07.360 --> 0:35:09.600
<v Speaker 2>of AMD's new earnings and forecasts.

0:35:09.600 --> 0:35:10.959
<v Speaker 1>We all know the storage.

0:35:10.760 --> 0:35:13.480
<v Speaker 2>VideA right now, a lot of the value is being

0:35:13.520 --> 0:35:16.200
<v Speaker 2>captured at that level, at the cloud level, with the

0:35:16.280 --> 0:35:18.160
<v Speaker 2>hyperscalers or with the chip producers.

0:35:18.400 --> 0:35:19.560
<v Speaker 1>What we're looking for is the.

0:35:19.480 --> 0:35:22.720
<v Speaker 2>Businesses who can navigate through this changing landscape and capture

0:35:22.800 --> 0:35:26.279
<v Speaker 2>value by providing services to people. James, you raise a

0:35:26.280 --> 0:35:28.680
<v Speaker 2>really good point because many of the founders at Caroline

0:35:28.719 --> 0:35:30.279
<v Speaker 2>and I speak to you, the first thing they think

0:35:30.320 --> 0:35:33.759
<v Speaker 2>about when they wake up literally is compute. It's expensive

0:35:33.800 --> 0:35:37.440
<v Speaker 2>and it's hard to secure. The UK startups have access

0:35:37.480 --> 0:35:38.360
<v Speaker 2>to that compute.

0:35:38.600 --> 0:35:39.880
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, it is a challenge.

0:35:39.920 --> 0:35:42.800
<v Speaker 2>You know, the UK locally has about a sixth or

0:35:42.920 --> 0:35:44.360
<v Speaker 2>sixth in the world in terms of the amount of

0:35:44.360 --> 0:35:47.120
<v Speaker 2>compute that has nationally well behind the US and China.

0:35:47.840 --> 0:35:50.680
<v Speaker 1>However, you know, we do have some local centers.

0:35:50.680 --> 0:35:53.160
<v Speaker 2>We've just announced in the UK funding for an exoscale

0:35:53.680 --> 0:35:56.800
<v Speaker 2>computing center as well, which will help, and international funds

0:35:56.800 --> 0:35:59.480
<v Speaker 2>like Bolderton have relationships with the likes of end VideA

0:35:59.520 --> 0:36:02.800
<v Speaker 2>and others so that we can provide access to cloud.

0:36:03.120 --> 0:36:06.360
<v Speaker 2>You know, this weekend in London we're providing access to

0:36:06.760 --> 0:36:09.160
<v Speaker 2>three hundred hackers. I think it's the biggest hackathon in

0:36:09.239 --> 0:36:15.720
<v Speaker 2>the agathon con Alert two tools for free of charge,

0:36:15.719 --> 0:36:17.920
<v Speaker 2>you know, subsidized byers and the providers to help them

0:36:17.960 --> 0:36:20.239
<v Speaker 2>start getting on the scale and learning how to use

0:36:20.280 --> 0:36:22.600
<v Speaker 2>these tools. And I think things like that, and things

0:36:22.640 --> 0:36:24.640
<v Speaker 2>like deals with en Video here in the UK means

0:36:24.680 --> 0:36:27.440
<v Speaker 2>that entrepreneurs here can compete and lead in the field.

0:36:27.719 --> 0:36:30.440
<v Speaker 3>Remember to invite us to your hackathons. James Wise of

0:36:30.520 --> 0:36:33.040
<v Speaker 3>Borders and Capital, thank you very much. Like coming out

0:36:33.040 --> 0:36:43.319
<v Speaker 3>there on the show. Meta set to be hit by

0:36:43.320 --> 0:36:46.400
<v Speaker 3>a privacy crackdown in the EU over its trove of

0:36:46.480 --> 0:36:49.800
<v Speaker 3>personal data that it uses to target users with ads.

0:36:49.840 --> 0:36:52.600
<v Speaker 5>Join us more. Our Big Tech editor Bloomberg.

0:36:52.200 --> 0:36:55.040
<v Speaker 3>Sarah Fryer, So, the mechanics of this are interesting and important.

0:36:55.560 --> 0:36:58.200
<v Speaker 3>What they're saying as you can't take the data from

0:36:58.239 --> 0:37:01.480
<v Speaker 3>your big platforms and use it in how you target

0:37:01.520 --> 0:37:02.680
<v Speaker 3>those users with ads.

0:37:03.200 --> 0:37:06.040
<v Speaker 12>Right, they're saying that the data collection at this scale

0:37:06.120 --> 0:37:10.000
<v Speaker 12>at which Meta has done it across Facebook, Instagram and

0:37:10.200 --> 0:37:14.040
<v Speaker 12>a Messenger is beyond what consumers have agreed.

0:37:13.640 --> 0:37:14.080
<v Speaker 5>To and.

0:37:15.600 --> 0:37:18.479
<v Speaker 12>Takes away their choice. And so what Meta has done

0:37:18.520 --> 0:37:22.839
<v Speaker 12>is they've operated or they've released this free version, this

0:37:23.000 --> 0:37:27.560
<v Speaker 12>ad free version, thinking that that would satisfy regulators and say,

0:37:27.719 --> 0:37:30.240
<v Speaker 12>you know, we're giving users a choice here, they don't

0:37:30.280 --> 0:37:34.160
<v Speaker 12>have to have ads. It's a sort of calculated move

0:37:34.200 --> 0:37:36.600
<v Speaker 12>on metas part, but because people probably won't use that

0:37:36.640 --> 0:37:42.200
<v Speaker 12>one that said, regulators aren't sure that that necessarily satisfies them,

0:37:42.200 --> 0:37:46.000
<v Speaker 12>and Meta saying that, you know, they have had discussions

0:37:46.040 --> 0:37:49.040
<v Speaker 12>over the course of many months trying to get to

0:37:49.080 --> 0:37:51.560
<v Speaker 12>a place where they can still operate in Europe, but

0:37:52.120 --> 0:37:53.719
<v Speaker 12>it looks a little tenuous right.

0:37:53.640 --> 0:37:56.480
<v Speaker 4>Now, Meta saying this statement is so white, Sarah. They've

0:37:56.480 --> 0:37:58.040
<v Speaker 4>been aware of this plan for weeks and we were

0:37:58.040 --> 0:38:00.000
<v Speaker 4>already fully engaged with them to arrive at a statisfy

0:38:00.040 --> 0:38:04.400
<v Speaker 4>factory outcomfortable parties. But the band is unjustifiably ignores that careful,

0:38:04.520 --> 0:38:08.160
<v Speaker 4>robust regulatory process. So when next, Because this is really

0:38:08.200 --> 0:38:11.399
<v Speaker 4>stemming from Norway, right, they've already come down in this way.

0:38:11.400 --> 0:38:14.440
<v Speaker 4>They're already getting fines on a daily basis. How harsh

0:38:14.440 --> 0:38:15.040
<v Speaker 4>could this get?

0:38:16.320 --> 0:38:18.000
<v Speaker 12>I mean it could It could be something that we

0:38:18.040 --> 0:38:21.759
<v Speaker 12>see in all of Europe. We could see that this

0:38:21.880 --> 0:38:26.200
<v Speaker 12>ad free version gets maybe deeper scrutiny as to whether

0:38:26.280 --> 0:38:30.160
<v Speaker 12>it collects data. Still, I think, you know, users aren't

0:38:30.200 --> 0:38:32.960
<v Speaker 12>is concerned about whether they have ads or not compared

0:38:33.000 --> 0:38:36.640
<v Speaker 12>to how much data is taken from them. So so

0:38:36.760 --> 0:38:39.560
<v Speaker 12>I think that that's that's what will come to next.

0:38:39.960 --> 0:38:44.120
<v Speaker 12>Already Meta has pulled back from Europe. Remember that Threads,

0:38:44.280 --> 0:38:48.240
<v Speaker 12>the new Instagram platform, wasn't launched there, so they are

0:38:48.440 --> 0:38:51.600
<v Speaker 12>they are trying to be a little bit more cautious

0:38:51.640 --> 0:38:54.320
<v Speaker 12>in the region, and that's difficult for the company because

0:38:54.680 --> 0:38:57.800
<v Speaker 12>it is one of their more lucrative ad regions around

0:38:57.800 --> 0:38:58.200
<v Speaker 12>the world.

0:38:58.920 --> 0:39:01.520
<v Speaker 4>So far, great to break that down. We thank you

0:39:01.560 --> 0:39:05.560
<v Speaker 4>the ongoing focus of regulators on Meta. Meanwhile, let's talk

0:39:05.600 --> 0:39:07.360
<v Speaker 4>about regulation here in the US when it comes to

0:39:07.400 --> 0:39:09.759
<v Speaker 4>crypto and indeed, while a trial that's going on we

0:39:09.800 --> 0:39:11.840
<v Speaker 4>all know the Crypto Ford trial of FTX coming to

0:39:11.840 --> 0:39:15.080
<v Speaker 4>a close this week. After Sam mcmnfred finished testifying, prosecu

0:39:15.239 --> 0:39:18.160
<v Speaker 4>just make their final pitch to the jury promotion. Alibassek

0:39:18.360 --> 0:39:20.960
<v Speaker 4>is going to be back at the courthouse tomorrow and

0:39:21.040 --> 0:39:23.239
<v Speaker 4>people have been like getting there at one to two

0:39:23.280 --> 0:39:25.239
<v Speaker 4>in the morning. May seem to get into this courthouse.

0:39:25.800 --> 0:39:28.120
<v Speaker 4>What are we anticipating. How quickly could any sort of

0:39:28.200 --> 0:39:29.120
<v Speaker 4>judgment be made him?

0:39:29.680 --> 0:39:31.799
<v Speaker 13>Well, it could be as early as the end of

0:39:31.800 --> 0:39:34.320
<v Speaker 13>this week, it could go into next week in theory

0:39:34.360 --> 0:39:36.520
<v Speaker 13>here because the jury has to deliberate, but they are

0:39:36.600 --> 0:39:38.799
<v Speaker 13>looking to get to a conclusion. What you're going through

0:39:38.800 --> 0:39:40.840
<v Speaker 13>today is we have Sam mcmanfried who wrapped up his

0:39:40.880 --> 0:39:44.000
<v Speaker 13>own testimony just yesterday, and now today you're watching the

0:39:44.000 --> 0:39:47.959
<v Speaker 13>prosecution really come in with closing remarks using Sam Bankmanfried's

0:39:47.960 --> 0:39:50.840
<v Speaker 13>own testimony against him. So what they are now saying

0:39:51.239 --> 0:39:54.040
<v Speaker 13>is you saw him come in early to his own defense,

0:39:54.320 --> 0:39:57.520
<v Speaker 13>very clear worded, very clear headed, and a day later

0:39:57.560 --> 0:40:01.640
<v Speaker 13>you saw him walk into the prosecution stumble over many definitions,

0:40:01.640 --> 0:40:05.160
<v Speaker 13>stumbling over many things that the prosecution put right in

0:40:05.200 --> 0:40:09.000
<v Speaker 13>front of him, books articles as to what he had said,

0:40:09.160 --> 0:40:13.600
<v Speaker 13>and then watching him either not remember or deny what

0:40:13.719 --> 0:40:15.759
<v Speaker 13>has been written or said about him.

0:40:16.320 --> 0:40:20.880
<v Speaker 3>What was SBF's defense beyond basically saying I wasn't a

0:40:20.960 --> 0:40:21.840
<v Speaker 3>very good CEO.

0:40:23.400 --> 0:40:25.759
<v Speaker 13>Well, that's the main defense, isn't it. This idea that

0:40:25.800 --> 0:40:27.920
<v Speaker 13>they didn't have the right risk management in place. And

0:40:27.960 --> 0:40:30.400
<v Speaker 13>the idea here was not just that, you know, he

0:40:30.480 --> 0:40:32.279
<v Speaker 13>wasn't a very good CEO, but he was trying to

0:40:32.320 --> 0:40:36.800
<v Speaker 13>show that he wasn't actually there or responsible for certain

0:40:36.840 --> 0:40:40.160
<v Speaker 13>amounts of the decisions made over at Alameda while Caroline

0:40:40.160 --> 0:40:42.759
<v Speaker 13>Ellison was running it. That's the distance he tried to

0:40:42.800 --> 0:40:46.120
<v Speaker 13>create from himself, because remember, he's trying to convince a jury,

0:40:46.280 --> 0:40:48.800
<v Speaker 13>many of which were not aware of what had happened

0:40:48.800 --> 0:40:51.279
<v Speaker 13>the last year a couple of years at FTX. Were

0:40:51.320 --> 0:40:53.160
<v Speaker 13>not aware of many of the inner workings of the

0:40:53.200 --> 0:40:55.719
<v Speaker 13>crypto industry, and we're not aware of a lot of

0:40:56.080 --> 0:40:58.040
<v Speaker 13>you know, what was allowed and what was not allowed

0:40:58.080 --> 0:41:00.960
<v Speaker 13>in terms of margin loans, as he has said, Alameda

0:41:01.000 --> 0:41:03.839
<v Speaker 13>had taken from FTX. But the prosecution is coming down

0:41:03.920 --> 0:41:08.600
<v Speaker 13>hard and going against him in terms of the discrepancies

0:41:08.640 --> 0:41:11.800
<v Speaker 13>in how he had shown what had happened over in FTX.

0:41:12.280 --> 0:41:14.920
<v Speaker 4>Shanana Bess can be back at that courthouse in New York.

0:41:15.000 --> 0:41:17.200
<v Speaker 4>We thanka Meanwhile, that does it for this suggation of

0:41:17.200 --> 0:41:18.319
<v Speaker 4>BlueBag technology today.

0:41:19.280 --> 0:41:20.239
<v Speaker 5>Shout out podcasts.

0:41:20.239 --> 0:41:22.799
<v Speaker 3>Wherever you get your podcasts, we have it everywhere from

0:41:22.880 --> 0:41:24.000
<v Speaker 3>SF in New York City.

0:41:24.400 --> 0:41:26.080
<v Speaker 5>This is Bloomberg technology