WEBVTT - 1139 | MLB Draft Superlatives, Home Run Derby Preview

0:00:10.800 --> 0:00:17.799
<v Speaker 1>This time Lague Cracker.

0:00:18.960 --> 0:00:35.600
<v Speaker 2>Bring we will see you Toms the Dunner.

0:00:36.280 --> 0:00:41.440
<v Speaker 3>Welcome Laming hang Out, Welcome to the Just Baseball Show.

0:00:41.560 --> 0:00:45.240
<v Speaker 3>It is Sunday, July twelfth, and you got the three

0:00:45.280 --> 0:00:47.559
<v Speaker 3>of us that Jack McFall and Arm Late and I

0:00:47.600 --> 0:00:50.720
<v Speaker 3>am Peter Rapple. And today we are doing a twenty

0:00:50.840 --> 0:00:54.800
<v Speaker 3>twenty six home run derby preview and a recap. What

0:00:54.960 --> 0:00:58.680
<v Speaker 3>kind of superlatives about the twenty twenty six MLB Draft

0:00:58.720 --> 0:01:02.520
<v Speaker 3>Because Arm Tyler and I did a three hour stream

0:01:02.560 --> 0:01:04.600
<v Speaker 3>on the draft, So now we're going to look at

0:01:04.640 --> 0:01:09.360
<v Speaker 3>the best of most underrated picks, best value picks, a

0:01:09.360 --> 0:01:11.360
<v Speaker 3>bunch of other fun things with the draft. And it's

0:01:11.360 --> 0:01:13.920
<v Speaker 3>all brought to you by bet MGM. And if you

0:01:13.959 --> 0:01:17.120
<v Speaker 3>haven't signed up for betmgm yet, use bonus code just

0:01:17.200 --> 0:01:19.319
<v Speaker 3>Baseball when signing up and you will get up to

0:01:19.360 --> 0:01:21.920
<v Speaker 3>a fifteen hundred dollars new player offer on your first

0:01:21.920 --> 0:01:24.640
<v Speaker 3>wager with BETMGM. Here's how it works. You just download

0:01:24.640 --> 0:01:28.240
<v Speaker 3>the betmgm app and sign up using bonus code just Baseball,

0:01:28.240 --> 0:01:30.920
<v Speaker 3>Deposit at least ten bucks, and place your first wager

0:01:31.240 --> 0:01:34.120
<v Speaker 3>on any game, and if that bet loses, you'll receive

0:01:34.400 --> 0:01:38.679
<v Speaker 3>up to fifteen hundred bucks in bonus bets, and maybe,

0:01:38.959 --> 0:01:42.440
<v Speaker 3>just maybe, if you haven't made a bet on BETMGM yet,

0:01:42.680 --> 0:01:45.000
<v Speaker 3>it's the perfect time to do so. ARM for the

0:01:45.080 --> 0:01:48.400
<v Speaker 3>Home Run Derby because I built out and Jack, you'll

0:01:48.400 --> 0:01:51.520
<v Speaker 3>love this a statistical model for the Home Run Derby,

0:01:51.960 --> 0:01:57.320
<v Speaker 3>a simulation. It simulated the Derby two hundred thousand times. Nope,

0:01:57.440 --> 0:01:59.760
<v Speaker 3>you gotta do more. And what you're also going to

0:01:59.800 --> 0:02:02.680
<v Speaker 3>appreciate and I don't want to spoil it yet, but

0:02:03.000 --> 0:02:07.200
<v Speaker 3>it came to a conclusion that a person who went

0:02:07.240 --> 0:02:10.000
<v Speaker 3>to Citizens Bank Park and had eight beers and bet

0:02:10.040 --> 0:02:13.000
<v Speaker 3>On vibes would also come to that conclusion. So whether

0:02:13.040 --> 0:02:15.840
<v Speaker 3>you build out a model and simulate the Derby two

0:02:15.919 --> 0:02:18.600
<v Speaker 3>hundred thousand times, or you drink eight beers, you're going

0:02:18.639 --> 0:02:19.640
<v Speaker 3>to come to the same answer.

0:02:20.120 --> 0:02:24.600
<v Speaker 4>My preferred models usually simulate North the six hundred thousand times,

0:02:24.600 --> 0:02:29.480
<v Speaker 4>So please ask your engine to simulate it four hundred

0:02:29.480 --> 0:02:30.360
<v Speaker 4>thousand more times?

0:02:30.520 --> 0:02:31.440
<v Speaker 3>How many like?

0:02:31.680 --> 0:02:35.320
<v Speaker 4>How long did it take to simulate two hundred thousand times?

0:02:35.360 --> 0:02:38.200
<v Speaker 3>Nothing? Claude just does it immediately. So I just put

0:02:38.080 --> 0:02:40.079
<v Speaker 3>in four thousand.

0:02:40.639 --> 0:02:42.440
<v Speaker 4>I could do it, you know what, Yeah, just say

0:02:42.520 --> 0:02:45.239
<v Speaker 4>keep going, keep going, keep going until your computer starts

0:02:45.240 --> 0:02:45.880
<v Speaker 4>foaming at the.

0:02:45.800 --> 0:02:47.600
<v Speaker 1>Mouthpeter, I'm tired.

0:02:49.919 --> 0:02:51.400
<v Speaker 3>I'm going to bounce you guys through the show. I'm

0:02:51.400 --> 0:02:53.680
<v Speaker 3>going to go simulate the Derby eight hundred thousand more

0:02:53.720 --> 0:02:56.160
<v Speaker 3>times so I could get the same answer, all right,

0:02:56.200 --> 0:02:59.200
<v Speaker 3>the same answer again as if just you said that

0:03:00.000 --> 0:03:01.320
<v Speaker 3>feels like it's going to be this guy.

0:03:01.400 --> 0:03:03.639
<v Speaker 1>So it was cool, though, I'm excited to kind of

0:03:03.639 --> 0:03:07.160
<v Speaker 1>compare the thoughts and we'll contrast there. But yeah, it

0:03:07.240 --> 0:03:08.680
<v Speaker 1>is funny that it kind of took you to the

0:03:08.720 --> 0:03:13.119
<v Speaker 1>same answer that it kind of just vibes guy out

0:03:13.120 --> 0:03:15.400
<v Speaker 1>and right Field just there for a good time, was

0:03:15.440 --> 0:03:17.520
<v Speaker 1>going to go with his prediction too exactly.

0:03:17.960 --> 0:03:19.920
<v Speaker 3>I assume it's all Wilson contreras.

0:03:19.520 --> 0:03:23.880
<v Speaker 1>Right, Wilson guy. In the history of a Derby.

0:03:24.160 --> 0:03:27.440
<v Speaker 3>Wilson gatures the sneaky value sneaky value of wilskatuz. But

0:03:27.480 --> 0:03:29.720
<v Speaker 3>I'm record be betting him. So let's go over the

0:03:29.760 --> 0:03:33.440
<v Speaker 3>rules first, because this is the first year the Derby

0:03:33.480 --> 0:03:35.520
<v Speaker 3>has changed in a long time. We got used to

0:03:35.560 --> 0:03:37.680
<v Speaker 3>the timer and then they said no timer, we're changing

0:03:37.680 --> 0:03:41.280
<v Speaker 3>it again. So each hitter gets twenty swings in the

0:03:41.320 --> 0:03:45.120
<v Speaker 3>first round, and every swing counts against that total, whether

0:03:45.160 --> 0:03:47.920
<v Speaker 3>the ball leaves the yard or not. A hitter. A

0:03:48.000 --> 0:03:52.120
<v Speaker 3>hitter who homers on his final swing keeps swinging until

0:03:52.160 --> 0:03:55.920
<v Speaker 3>he makes an out. The four highest home run totals

0:03:56.000 --> 0:04:00.040
<v Speaker 3>advanced to seeded head to head semi finals, and the

0:04:00.080 --> 0:04:03.480
<v Speaker 3>two winners meet in the final with fifteen swings per

0:04:03.520 --> 0:04:06.480
<v Speaker 3>hitter in both of those rounds, and then the totals

0:04:06.560 --> 0:04:11.560
<v Speaker 3>reset each round. There are no bonus rounds and no timeouts.

0:04:11.920 --> 0:04:15.400
<v Speaker 3>First round ties are broken by the longest home run,

0:04:15.680 --> 0:04:20.400
<v Speaker 3>and the later rounds use a three swing swing off.

0:04:20.760 --> 0:04:23.400
<v Speaker 3>Any questions, no much.

0:04:23.440 --> 0:04:25.680
<v Speaker 1>My immediate thought was, all of a sudden, it feels

0:04:25.720 --> 0:04:26.920
<v Speaker 1>like age matters less.

0:04:27.000 --> 0:04:29.839
<v Speaker 3>Now, Yes, I'm with you, that was my exact thought.

0:04:30.480 --> 0:04:33.600
<v Speaker 3>And it's like the guys who I agree have more stamina.

0:04:33.680 --> 0:04:35.200
<v Speaker 3>Like I remember, we've talked about a lot of the

0:04:35.240 --> 0:04:37.680
<v Speaker 3>younger guys who have ended up winning this competition. That's

0:04:37.720 --> 0:04:41.520
<v Speaker 3>why in twenty twenty four when Taoscar won it, not

0:04:41.560 --> 0:04:43.679
<v Speaker 3>only was that you know a player in the field

0:04:43.680 --> 0:04:45.320
<v Speaker 3>that was ranked fifth or six, but he was an

0:04:45.320 --> 0:04:47.599
<v Speaker 3>older player. He was kind of the only guy to

0:04:47.680 --> 0:04:52.320
<v Speaker 3>win in this timer era that was above the age

0:04:52.360 --> 0:04:54.640
<v Speaker 3>of twenty eight years old. So now we throw all

0:04:54.640 --> 0:04:57.279
<v Speaker 3>of that out the window. We finally get to watch

0:04:57.320 --> 0:05:00.360
<v Speaker 3>guys just hit dangers. Those are the rules. We don't

0:05:00.360 --> 0:05:02.799
<v Speaker 3>have to It's not like every five seconds you're seeing

0:05:02.800 --> 0:05:04.880
<v Speaker 3>a ball fly, especially arm I know you and I

0:05:05.000 --> 0:05:07.360
<v Speaker 3>especially have been to the home run Derby now five

0:05:07.440 --> 0:05:10.640
<v Speaker 3>or six times. Jack, you two, like when the balls

0:05:10.680 --> 0:05:13.680
<v Speaker 3>are just going out so quickly, you don't get to

0:05:13.920 --> 0:05:17.160
<v Speaker 3>sit there and enjoy any of the homers. No, that

0:05:17.480 --> 0:05:18.480
<v Speaker 3>that's a huge thing.

0:05:18.520 --> 0:05:21.400
<v Speaker 4>The other thing is, you know, if you remember the

0:05:21.480 --> 0:05:24.360
<v Speaker 4>pre clock era of the home run Derby, a lot

0:05:24.360 --> 0:05:26.800
<v Speaker 4>of people get very frustrated by the sheer number of takes.

0:05:26.880 --> 0:05:28.560
<v Speaker 4>It's like, how do we get these guy to how

0:05:28.560 --> 0:05:31.680
<v Speaker 4>do we get these guys to swing more? But we

0:05:31.760 --> 0:05:34.640
<v Speaker 4>had the opportunity to try both, and I think I'd

0:05:34.680 --> 0:05:37.360
<v Speaker 4>prefer watching guys take and then watching the ball fly

0:05:37.480 --> 0:05:40.599
<v Speaker 4>as opposed to, okay, how many swings did you just

0:05:40.680 --> 0:05:41.320
<v Speaker 4>get off here?

0:05:41.400 --> 0:05:43.080
<v Speaker 3>And it's like I can't even track a baseball.

0:05:43.160 --> 0:05:46.120
<v Speaker 4>So I like it could be a lesser of two

0:05:46.200 --> 0:05:48.560
<v Speaker 4>evils type of conversation, But I think this one is

0:05:48.600 --> 0:05:50.120
<v Speaker 4>certainly the lesser of two evils.

0:05:50.400 --> 0:05:52.800
<v Speaker 1>That's the thing I agree with. Well, one also a

0:05:52.839 --> 0:05:56.839
<v Speaker 1>bad picture, which is an unfortunate circumstance, can't fully derail

0:05:57.440 --> 0:06:00.440
<v Speaker 1>a guy, like It'll still be difficult, it'll hurt you

0:06:00.480 --> 0:06:01.960
<v Speaker 1>a little bit. But when you're on a timer, like

0:06:02.240 --> 0:06:04.839
<v Speaker 1>if your pitcher can't find it, like you're you're screwed.

0:06:05.080 --> 0:06:07.640
<v Speaker 1>Your time's ticking. But now I think it's a more

0:06:07.680 --> 0:06:11.680
<v Speaker 1>relaxed setting where you get X amount of swings. I

0:06:11.680 --> 0:06:13.200
<v Speaker 1>think it at least, you know, allows a guy to

0:06:13.200 --> 0:06:14.479
<v Speaker 1>be able to find it a little bit and not

0:06:14.600 --> 0:06:16.760
<v Speaker 1>rush it. The other side is just that, Yeah, I

0:06:16.839 --> 0:06:19.600
<v Speaker 1>would more than happily watch a guy spin on a

0:06:19.600 --> 0:06:22.599
<v Speaker 1>couple balls that just aren't located well to be able

0:06:22.640 --> 0:06:24.640
<v Speaker 1>to see how far it flies and soak it in.

0:06:25.360 --> 0:06:27.800
<v Speaker 1>Then just see three in the air. It feels like

0:06:27.839 --> 0:06:29.440
<v Speaker 1>at the same time, I have no idea where to look,

0:06:29.480 --> 0:06:31.640
<v Speaker 1>and and right as you're watching it fly like that,

0:06:31.920 --> 0:06:33.960
<v Speaker 1>the next ball is on its way. So now I

0:06:34.000 --> 0:06:36.760
<v Speaker 1>think the changes are good. I'm excited about it, but

0:06:36.760 --> 0:06:39.040
<v Speaker 1>I'm also like, there's always going to be something. It

0:06:39.440 --> 0:06:41.880
<v Speaker 1>seems like it's impossible to make it perfect. So I'm

0:06:41.960 --> 0:06:44.080
<v Speaker 1>eagerly awaiting what I'm not going to like, But I'm

0:06:44.080 --> 0:06:46.840
<v Speaker 1>going to focus on the positives. I'm going to straight

0:06:46.960 --> 0:06:49.480
<v Speaker 1>what I normally do. I'm pretty fired up to figure

0:06:49.480 --> 0:06:50.960
<v Speaker 1>out what I hate too. It's like, you know what,

0:06:51.000 --> 0:06:53.280
<v Speaker 1>I decide, I hate this new thing. So I wake

0:06:53.360 --> 0:06:54.760
<v Speaker 1>up every day just getting ready to do.

0:06:55.160 --> 0:06:58.080
<v Speaker 4>What can I hate today? That's new, fresh and exciting.

0:06:58.800 --> 0:07:01.880
<v Speaker 4>So I'm glad that you did bring up arm the

0:07:01.920 --> 0:07:05.600
<v Speaker 4>pitchers right? Could they get the yips? Could they start

0:07:05.600 --> 0:07:08.920
<v Speaker 4>throwing balls? I still think and I'm curious your guys

0:07:08.960 --> 0:07:12.200
<v Speaker 4>is of this opinion. I still think it matters. Like

0:07:12.280 --> 0:07:16.280
<v Speaker 4>I think, the better the BP thrower, the more familiar

0:07:16.400 --> 0:07:19.960
<v Speaker 4>you are with said BP thrower, likely the better you're

0:07:20.120 --> 0:07:23.000
<v Speaker 4>going to do. Because you know, some guys like I

0:07:23.000 --> 0:07:25.880
<v Speaker 4>remember Pete Alonso cal Rawley last year, they won with

0:07:25.920 --> 0:07:26.360
<v Speaker 4>their dad.

0:07:26.720 --> 0:07:29.680
<v Speaker 3>This wasn't a coach who was, you know, an expert

0:07:29.720 --> 0:07:32.560
<v Speaker 3>BP thrower. This was their dad when they were used to,

0:07:33.240 --> 0:07:35.840
<v Speaker 3>you know, facing this guy throughout their entire childhood and

0:07:35.920 --> 0:07:36.680
<v Speaker 3>the middle years.

0:07:36.960 --> 0:07:38.960
<v Speaker 4>Did Alonzo win with his dad or did he win

0:07:39.040 --> 0:07:41.760
<v Speaker 4>with Iron Dave Jous who is the best BP?

0:07:42.000 --> 0:07:45.760
<v Speaker 3>It was the best BPF. Literally, he won multiple and

0:07:45.800 --> 0:07:47.680
<v Speaker 3>I think one of them was either with his dad

0:07:47.760 --> 0:07:52.160
<v Speaker 3>or his cousin. I'm nine percent sure it was a

0:07:52.200 --> 0:07:56.160
<v Speaker 3>family member, but I think that familiar exactly. I think

0:07:56.160 --> 0:07:59.720
<v Speaker 3>that familiarity matters, or a guy who's been throwing you

0:07:59.760 --> 0:08:02.880
<v Speaker 3>back practice in the cage for two years, like Kyle

0:08:02.920 --> 0:08:06.200
<v Speaker 3>Schwarber's guy. One that I think is the biggest concern

0:08:06.760 --> 0:08:10.560
<v Speaker 3>is Bryce Harper's BP pitcher. He even said that they're

0:08:10.640 --> 0:08:15.480
<v Speaker 3>going in blind. What's his name? His name is Dino Ebel,

0:08:16.120 --> 0:08:18.960
<v Speaker 3>the dad of Trey Ebl who just got drafted by

0:08:18.960 --> 0:08:20.440
<v Speaker 3>the Milwaukee Brewers.

0:08:20.520 --> 0:08:23.040
<v Speaker 4>And Brady and the third race coach of the LA Dodgers,

0:08:23.080 --> 0:08:24.560
<v Speaker 4>Dino Evil exactly.

0:08:25.360 --> 0:08:28.320
<v Speaker 3>He's a good BP thrower. But Harper even said we're

0:08:28.360 --> 0:08:31.920
<v Speaker 3>going in blind because he's never thrown to Harper in

0:08:31.960 --> 0:08:34.760
<v Speaker 3>his life. I feel like that could end up hurting

0:08:34.800 --> 0:08:36.640
<v Speaker 3>Harper thoughts.

0:08:39.200 --> 0:08:41.040
<v Speaker 1>My pushback on that when we were talking out of it before,

0:08:41.120 --> 0:08:44.480
<v Speaker 1>is that like he's kind of dialed. I feel like

0:08:44.520 --> 0:08:46.400
<v Speaker 1>on the BP, I think he's gonna be money to

0:08:46.559 --> 0:08:49.360
<v Speaker 1>throw into like generations of kids. He's gonna be nasty

0:08:49.400 --> 0:08:51.800
<v Speaker 1>with it. But there is kind of a cadence and

0:08:51.840 --> 0:08:53.960
<v Speaker 1>timing and familiarity. I'm sure that is a big part

0:08:53.960 --> 0:08:58.040
<v Speaker 1>of it, and I think that does contribute. But Dino

0:08:58.160 --> 0:08:59.520
<v Speaker 1>might be locked I don't know.

0:09:00.080 --> 0:09:01.960
<v Speaker 3>And to your point, arm Dino has thrown in the

0:09:03.080 --> 0:09:04.520
<v Speaker 3>in the home run derby before.

0:09:04.800 --> 0:09:06.640
<v Speaker 1>So that's big too. I think if you've thrown in

0:09:06.679 --> 0:09:08.800
<v Speaker 1>the derby before, like you could be a big league

0:09:08.840 --> 0:09:11.760
<v Speaker 1>third base coach, but not until the lights are on

0:09:11.800 --> 0:09:14.679
<v Speaker 1>you and there's forty thousand people there. And like your

0:09:14.960 --> 0:09:18.600
<v Speaker 1>ability to gently throw a ball over the plate, which

0:09:18.640 --> 0:09:20.800
<v Speaker 1>is I think harder than throwing it hard over the

0:09:20.800 --> 0:09:24.559
<v Speaker 1>plate from that distance, like it is basically makes or

0:09:24.600 --> 0:09:27.640
<v Speaker 1>breaks a Major League Baseball player's opportunity to win the derby.

0:09:28.000 --> 0:09:30.840
<v Speaker 1>I think it's got to be crazy, crazy, nerve racking

0:09:30.840 --> 0:09:34.080
<v Speaker 1>if you've never done it before, but you go ahead.

0:09:34.400 --> 0:09:37.280
<v Speaker 4>No, no, no, But if anybody knows nerve wracking BP,

0:09:37.440 --> 0:09:40.199
<v Speaker 4>it's probably deno Ebel, who has to throw to Otani

0:09:40.280 --> 0:09:43.000
<v Speaker 4>every day. And like, I understand that it's not in

0:09:43.000 --> 0:09:46.000
<v Speaker 4>a public setting, but if you're throwing to Otani constantly,

0:09:46.000 --> 0:09:47.960
<v Speaker 4>and you're throwing to Freeman and Mets, you better be

0:09:48.080 --> 0:09:51.360
<v Speaker 4>locked in. And I feel good about a Dodger BP

0:09:51.520 --> 0:09:52.560
<v Speaker 4>thrower throwing to Harper.

0:09:52.880 --> 0:09:56.840
<v Speaker 3>So it's funny. Like my statistical bottle, two hundred thousand simulations,

0:09:56.880 --> 0:09:58.440
<v Speaker 3>I had to rank them, and the rest of the

0:09:58.480 --> 0:10:01.200
<v Speaker 3>guys have pretty good BP throwers, So I ranked Harper's

0:10:01.240 --> 0:10:03.440
<v Speaker 3>guy last because they've never thrown to each other. But

0:10:03.559 --> 0:10:04.680
<v Speaker 3>generally speaking, I don't.

0:10:04.559 --> 0:10:07.240
<v Speaker 4>Wait, you had to rank the throwers for Claude, rank

0:10:07.320 --> 0:10:09.959
<v Speaker 4>the throwers. Let's man, no, no, do it three hundred

0:10:09.960 --> 0:10:11.040
<v Speaker 4>thousand more times and then we'll.

0:10:10.920 --> 0:10:12.480
<v Speaker 1>Start some more times.

0:10:12.720 --> 0:10:15.400
<v Speaker 3>I think the best the best BP thrower, Junior camer

0:10:15.480 --> 0:10:17.599
<v Speaker 3>Arrow's got a good one. They got through to the

0:10:18.200 --> 0:10:21.079
<v Speaker 3>Randy Rose Arena when he finishes the runner up, and

0:10:21.160 --> 0:10:24.439
<v Speaker 3>through to Cameron Arrow himself last year when camen Aro

0:10:24.520 --> 0:10:26.800
<v Speaker 3>was the runner up. So that's my number one ranked

0:10:26.800 --> 0:10:29.240
<v Speaker 3>BP thrower. I love the derby.

0:10:30.040 --> 0:10:31.319
<v Speaker 1>I don't know does he have what it takes to

0:10:31.360 --> 0:10:33.360
<v Speaker 1>push him across the finish line. It doesn't sound like.

0:10:33.440 --> 0:10:35.920
<v Speaker 3>A lot of runner ups. Maybe shy Dokam tri sim

0:10:36.360 --> 0:10:38.120
<v Speaker 3>some of the gatorade too, or is it just the

0:10:38.200 --> 0:10:41.120
<v Speaker 3>hitters that get it during the timeout? Some of these

0:10:41.120 --> 0:10:44.000
<v Speaker 3>pictures may need some gatorade but no timer, so again

0:10:44.040 --> 0:10:45.400
<v Speaker 3>they get to take their time a little bit.

0:10:45.880 --> 0:10:46.880
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, no doubt.

0:10:47.120 --> 0:10:49.520
<v Speaker 3>That was a very entertating segment about BP throwers. Let's

0:10:49.520 --> 0:10:51.079
<v Speaker 3>talk about whom you actually think is going to win

0:10:51.120 --> 0:10:53.120
<v Speaker 3>the Derby? Talk about who we think is going to

0:10:53.160 --> 0:10:56.000
<v Speaker 3>win the Derby? Arm where are you out here?

0:10:57.000 --> 0:11:00.320
<v Speaker 1>This is, as Peyton said a couple episodes ago, this

0:11:00.440 --> 0:11:02.960
<v Speaker 1>is like the ball Knower's Derby, And Jack and I speculated,

0:11:03.000 --> 0:11:04.520
<v Speaker 1>like who could fill the last couple of spots. We

0:11:04.600 --> 0:11:06.760
<v Speaker 1>knew it would be Schwarber, and we thought very confidently

0:11:06.800 --> 0:11:08.560
<v Speaker 1>that it would be Harper as well. We get those two.

0:11:09.200 --> 0:11:11.480
<v Speaker 1>I would not have thought that Murakami would be in

0:11:11.480 --> 0:11:14.679
<v Speaker 1>this thing, and I think that brings a really fun element.

0:11:15.360 --> 0:11:17.559
<v Speaker 1>We talked about it. Peter and I talked about it

0:11:17.600 --> 0:11:20.680
<v Speaker 1>a little bit before we hit record of like maybe

0:11:20.760 --> 0:11:24.040
<v Speaker 1>he hasn't played in a while, but I think, as

0:11:24.080 --> 0:11:25.960
<v Speaker 1>Peter brought this point up, like, I think it actually

0:11:26.000 --> 0:11:29.040
<v Speaker 1>works in his favor one because he's gonna feel fresh

0:11:29.080 --> 0:11:32.240
<v Speaker 1>and feel good. But too, there's no chance that Murakami's

0:11:32.240 --> 0:11:34.360
<v Speaker 1>in this thing if he's not feeling great, Like even

0:11:34.360 --> 0:11:36.720
<v Speaker 1>if the hammy was a little tight, I don't think

0:11:36.800 --> 0:11:40.280
<v Speaker 1>he's doing this thing. So I just think now this field,

0:11:40.320 --> 0:11:43.760
<v Speaker 1>how ridiculous it is, and the age thing not mattering

0:11:43.800 --> 0:11:47.360
<v Speaker 1>as much. It's really hard to not kind of stray

0:11:47.400 --> 0:11:51.000
<v Speaker 1>back towards or drift back towards the vets and like

0:11:51.040 --> 0:11:54.240
<v Speaker 1>a Schwarber or even when Otako was younger. I just

0:11:54.280 --> 0:11:56.079
<v Speaker 1>think this setting, all of a sudden is pretty exciting

0:11:56.120 --> 0:11:59.080
<v Speaker 1>because his swing is just scrooved for just balls in

0:11:59.120 --> 0:12:03.160
<v Speaker 1>the air hard consistently, and I think it could work

0:12:03.200 --> 0:12:05.760
<v Speaker 1>really well from Murakami as well. But Schwerbur in the

0:12:05.800 --> 0:12:08.440
<v Speaker 1>bank with this format's going to be tough too. But

0:12:08.480 --> 0:12:09.679
<v Speaker 1>I'm excited about Murakami.

0:12:10.160 --> 0:12:12.640
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, real quick on the Murakami thing, and Jack, I'm

0:12:12.640 --> 0:12:15.920
<v Speaker 3>curious to your thoughts on this too. It's you can

0:12:16.000 --> 0:12:17.800
<v Speaker 3>kind of there's two forks in the road and you

0:12:17.920 --> 0:12:20.959
<v Speaker 3>go either direction with mun To Taka Murakami. One is

0:12:21.440 --> 0:12:24.200
<v Speaker 3>he's only played three games since you returned from the IL,

0:12:24.559 --> 0:12:26.560
<v Speaker 3>and now he has to go do this home run derby,

0:12:26.800 --> 0:12:30.280
<v Speaker 3>even though he has done I think two in Japan.

0:12:30.320 --> 0:12:32.360
<v Speaker 3>I know he's done one. I think it's two in Japan,

0:12:32.679 --> 0:12:36.920
<v Speaker 3>but he's ever done one Stateside. Obviously, completely new rules

0:12:37.520 --> 0:12:40.520
<v Speaker 3>after the injury, he's not going to do all that well,

0:12:41.200 --> 0:12:44.040
<v Speaker 3>or you could look at it, he's the freshest he

0:12:44.120 --> 0:12:46.760
<v Speaker 3>has come back. He clearly is healthy because the white

0:12:46.760 --> 0:12:49.480
<v Speaker 3>socks are playing him, and he agreed to do the derby.

0:12:49.760 --> 0:12:51.760
<v Speaker 3>Even though it's not much of a stamina game, you

0:12:51.800 --> 0:12:54.760
<v Speaker 3>still have to have some stamina to be punishing baseball's

0:12:54.760 --> 0:12:57.240
<v Speaker 3>four hundred and forty feet out of the ballpark, right,

0:12:57.320 --> 0:13:00.599
<v Speaker 3>So which way do you lean on, murra Commy, Is

0:13:00.640 --> 0:13:04.080
<v Speaker 3>that the health thing is actually completely overblown and he's

0:13:04.120 --> 0:13:06.440
<v Speaker 3>the freshest or do you think it actually will affect

0:13:06.480 --> 0:13:09.679
<v Speaker 3>him during the derby? Before I answer this question, does

0:13:09.679 --> 0:13:11.120
<v Speaker 3>this sound awful? Right now?

0:13:11.240 --> 0:13:13.880
<v Speaker 4>I'm at the Fort Lauernale Hollywood International Airport, So why

0:13:13.880 --> 0:13:15.920
<v Speaker 4>don't you guys talk a little bit about more about

0:13:15.920 --> 0:13:18.480
<v Speaker 4>the rest of the field, and I'll chime in, Actually, no,

0:13:18.559 --> 0:13:20.480
<v Speaker 4>never mind, they're not done. You guys talk a little

0:13:20.480 --> 0:13:22.280
<v Speaker 4>bit more about the rest of the field, and then

0:13:22.360 --> 0:13:24.880
<v Speaker 4>when they do decide to shut up on the speakers,

0:13:25.200 --> 0:13:26.240
<v Speaker 4>I will jump up six.

0:13:26.480 --> 0:13:26.800
<v Speaker 1>All right.

0:13:26.840 --> 0:13:29.920
<v Speaker 3>I assumed that Jack agrees with you, and I are

0:13:30.120 --> 0:13:31.720
<v Speaker 3>that I don't think the health is going to affect

0:13:31.800 --> 0:13:34.920
<v Speaker 3>him that much, So I do like Murakami. I also

0:13:34.960 --> 0:13:37.640
<v Speaker 3>think that Jack Haglion is going to be a problem. Yeah,

0:13:37.760 --> 0:13:41.080
<v Speaker 3>I think that Jack Haglion because again, I think again,

0:13:41.320 --> 0:13:43.840
<v Speaker 3>we should focus on left handed bats. At a citizens

0:13:43.880 --> 0:13:47.560
<v Speaker 3>Bank Park, per baseball Savon's park factor one fifteen for

0:13:47.600 --> 0:13:51.200
<v Speaker 3>homers for lefties, one oh five for righties. Generally speaking,

0:13:51.760 --> 0:13:54.600
<v Speaker 3>citizens Bank Park plays better for the left handed bats,

0:13:54.679 --> 0:13:58.800
<v Speaker 3>especially power wise, and per our friends at Ballpark, Palell

0:13:59.440 --> 0:14:01.600
<v Speaker 3>about eight to ten mile on our winds blowing out

0:14:01.640 --> 0:14:04.440
<v Speaker 3>to right center, so the wind is helping the lefties.

0:14:04.920 --> 0:14:09.400
<v Speaker 3>The stadium already helps the lefties and all the lefties

0:14:09.400 --> 0:14:13.000
<v Speaker 3>that this competition rake right. So you've got a couple

0:14:13.080 --> 0:14:15.600
<v Speaker 3>ritings who might have to overcome a couple of deficiencies

0:14:15.640 --> 0:14:16.920
<v Speaker 3>that the lefties get in their favor.

0:14:17.040 --> 0:14:20.800
<v Speaker 4>Check I cut the field in half for myself. Personally,

0:14:20.920 --> 0:14:25.880
<v Speaker 4>I view four as legit, legit contenders, and I guess

0:14:25.880 --> 0:14:29.200
<v Speaker 4>Schwarber's in there too. The guy that is number five

0:14:29.240 --> 0:14:31.640
<v Speaker 4>for me, like I think Jordan Walker could put together

0:14:31.800 --> 0:14:34.080
<v Speaker 4>some crazy swings, I don't know if he's gonna win

0:14:34.160 --> 0:14:36.480
<v Speaker 4>this whole thing. The guy that I keep coming back

0:14:36.520 --> 0:14:39.120
<v Speaker 4>to but is outside the top four for me is

0:14:39.160 --> 0:14:41.120
<v Speaker 4>Ben Rice, Like I think Ben Rice can have a

0:14:41.200 --> 0:14:45.160
<v Speaker 4>really solid showing in this derby, but he's five for me.

0:14:45.320 --> 0:14:48.520
<v Speaker 4>And the four legit contenders that I feel like are

0:14:48.560 --> 0:14:53.480
<v Speaker 4>coming into this are Schwarber, Murakami, Caglione, and Junior. I

0:14:53.560 --> 0:14:56.240
<v Speaker 4>understand that it's more favorable to a left handed hitter,

0:14:56.320 --> 0:14:58.880
<v Speaker 4>but at the end of the day, Junior is Junior.

0:14:59.040 --> 0:15:01.800
<v Speaker 4>What we've seen from him and these swings, man, it

0:15:01.840 --> 0:15:04.800
<v Speaker 4>could be absolutely ridiculous, But I think Kagleiann's a really

0:15:04.840 --> 0:15:05.240
<v Speaker 4>good shout.

0:15:05.320 --> 0:15:05.680
<v Speaker 1>Right now.

0:15:06.120 --> 0:15:09.240
<v Speaker 3>I think Murri Kami is my pick, but I don't

0:15:09.280 --> 0:15:11.960
<v Speaker 3>feel really good about that. Well, the model feels pretty

0:15:11.960 --> 0:15:13.760
<v Speaker 3>good about that. I got a number two, Jack, You

0:15:13.800 --> 0:15:16.920
<v Speaker 3>and the model you're simulating everything. Wow, how what was he?

0:15:17.040 --> 0:15:20.520
<v Speaker 4>Like sixty five thousand simulations came out to Murakami or no?

0:15:20.560 --> 0:15:24.400
<v Speaker 4>Like so the eighth number eight on the totem pole.

0:15:24.480 --> 0:15:26.360
<v Speaker 4>How many of the two hundred thousand did he win?

0:15:26.600 --> 0:15:31.760
<v Speaker 3>Derby? That is a good question, So let me scroll on,

0:15:31.920 --> 0:15:32.920
<v Speaker 3>Like what was the deviation?

0:15:33.080 --> 0:15:35.000
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, it is in terms a good question, like was

0:15:35.040 --> 0:15:37.600
<v Speaker 1>there someone that was just so cooked? But there's no

0:15:37.640 --> 0:15:38.480
<v Speaker 1>way because they're all.

0:15:38.520 --> 0:15:42.600
<v Speaker 4>Like Wilson Contreras won fourteen Derbys of the two hundred thousand.

0:15:42.840 --> 0:15:45.080
<v Speaker 3>I mean, phi Philly's fans aren't gonna like this.

0:15:45.240 --> 0:15:45.640
<v Speaker 1>Harper?

0:15:47.200 --> 0:15:50.920
<v Speaker 3>How many did Harper win for the two hundred Harper one.

0:15:52.720 --> 0:15:55.840
<v Speaker 3>Now I'm trying to give you a percentage. It's like

0:15:56.520 --> 0:16:00.360
<v Speaker 3>five point five percent. Five point five percent.

0:16:00.480 --> 0:16:03.520
<v Speaker 4>Okay, it's like the it's like SpongeBob trying to pass

0:16:03.520 --> 0:16:06.560
<v Speaker 4>his boating exam. You needed seven hundred, you got six.

0:16:07.600 --> 0:16:10.920
<v Speaker 3>That's what the coming in coming in seventh. I had Wilson,

0:16:10.920 --> 0:16:15.680
<v Speaker 3>Cantreras coming in sixth, Ben Rice, then Jordan Walker, and

0:16:15.760 --> 0:16:20.440
<v Speaker 3>my top four were CAGs, Murakami, Cameron Aro and Schwarber.

0:16:20.440 --> 0:16:25.120
<v Speaker 3>But it's actually ranked Schwarber number one, Murakami number two,

0:16:26.200 --> 0:16:28.960
<v Speaker 3>Caglione number three, camon Arow number four.

0:16:30.320 --> 0:16:32.720
<v Speaker 1>It's hard to argue against that. I do like I

0:16:32.760 --> 0:16:37.720
<v Speaker 1>do like the order there I do. There's I want

0:16:37.720 --> 0:16:39.720
<v Speaker 1>to go Schwarber, and there's part of me that like

0:16:39.800 --> 0:16:42.720
<v Speaker 1>I could see it just going, oh gosh, of course

0:16:42.720 --> 0:16:44.400
<v Speaker 1>it was Schwarber, and we watch him win with the

0:16:44.440 --> 0:16:46.720
<v Speaker 1>bank behind him, and just it's just this most like

0:16:47.640 --> 0:16:49.680
<v Speaker 1>I don't want to say predictable, but just kind of

0:16:49.720 --> 0:16:51.960
<v Speaker 1>chalk situation that would be amazing to see. At the

0:16:52.000 --> 0:16:54.080
<v Speaker 1>same time, but I also could see it just Harper

0:16:54.160 --> 0:16:56.240
<v Speaker 1>is like, you think that guy's gonna go down without

0:16:56.240 --> 0:16:58.200
<v Speaker 1>a fight, Like it's one that I think, like you

0:16:58.240 --> 0:17:03.200
<v Speaker 1>can't fully value the just dog in that guy and

0:17:03.240 --> 0:17:05.680
<v Speaker 1>how bad he's gonna want it, Like I think Bryce

0:17:05.720 --> 0:17:08.879
<v Speaker 1>Harper really will want this bad and I think that

0:17:08.920 --> 0:17:11.639
<v Speaker 1>part's gonna make it fascinating. And also the part that, like,

0:17:12.600 --> 0:17:15.600
<v Speaker 1>he's a guy that is just so consistent with his swing,

0:17:15.920 --> 0:17:18.520
<v Speaker 1>and I just think about an MVP in this kind

0:17:18.520 --> 0:17:20.680
<v Speaker 1>of setting, he could kind of get into a rhythm

0:17:20.720 --> 0:17:22.919
<v Speaker 1>here where he's just putting them out pretty consistently. So

0:17:23.359 --> 0:17:26.760
<v Speaker 1>I do I agree with the top end. I think

0:17:26.800 --> 0:17:29.120
<v Speaker 1>I'd put Harper a couple of spots up, but maybe

0:17:29.119 --> 0:17:30.520
<v Speaker 1>that's just because he's Bryce Harper.

0:17:30.600 --> 0:17:33.120
<v Speaker 3>It's so funny. Yeah, real quick.

0:17:33.160 --> 0:17:35.479
<v Speaker 4>I mean, you remember the run that Harper went on

0:17:35.560 --> 0:17:37.720
<v Speaker 4>in Washington. Obviously he was a much younger version of

0:17:37.720 --> 0:17:39.439
<v Speaker 4>Bryce Harper at that time when he won the derby

0:17:39.440 --> 0:17:42.199
<v Speaker 4>in Washington, But like you remember the end of some

0:17:42.320 --> 0:17:45.199
<v Speaker 4>of his rounds in Washington where it was rinse and

0:17:45.240 --> 0:17:49.680
<v Speaker 4>repeat identical, like ballflight was identical. He was just peppering

0:17:49.720 --> 0:17:52.600
<v Speaker 4>it was it was, to Arm's point, like the exact

0:17:52.760 --> 0:17:56.200
<v Speaker 4>same thing like eight times at the end of these rounds.

0:17:57.080 --> 0:18:00.560
<v Speaker 3>I think what the model is failing to count for

0:18:00.840 --> 0:18:02.760
<v Speaker 3>is that dog in them? And I think that's what

0:18:02.800 --> 0:18:05.280
<v Speaker 3>models always fail to do. That's why models every single

0:18:05.280 --> 0:18:07.639
<v Speaker 3>season when we do our win totals episode arm the

0:18:07.680 --> 0:18:09.919
<v Speaker 3>Brewers are every year like eighty one and a half,

0:18:10.359 --> 0:18:12.200
<v Speaker 3>We're like, what, that's why you got to touch grass

0:18:12.200 --> 0:18:15.040
<v Speaker 3>and watch the game exactly so here. But here's the

0:18:15.040 --> 0:18:17.720
<v Speaker 3>thing about Bryce Harper, Right, you look at the stack

0:18:17.800 --> 0:18:20.560
<v Speaker 3>cast outa from this year, like he doesn't have the

0:18:20.600 --> 0:18:23.400
<v Speaker 3>power that he used to. So we're kind of relying

0:18:23.440 --> 0:18:26.560
<v Speaker 3>on with Harper compared to the rest of the field, because,

0:18:26.600 --> 0:18:28.000
<v Speaker 3>I mean, this is a collection of some of the

0:18:28.000 --> 0:18:30.560
<v Speaker 3>greatest power hitters in all of baseball. And Bryce Harper

0:18:30.640 --> 0:18:32.320
<v Speaker 3>is having a great season. But he has twenty home

0:18:32.400 --> 0:18:34.000
<v Speaker 3>runs for a reason. Right, He's not going to hit

0:18:34.040 --> 0:18:37.680
<v Speaker 3>forty five jacks this year. He's a really, really good hinter,

0:18:37.760 --> 0:18:40.760
<v Speaker 3>but I wouldn't even say that home runs are necessarily

0:18:41.080 --> 0:18:44.000
<v Speaker 3>his game at this point compared to everybody else. I mean,

0:18:44.040 --> 0:18:46.520
<v Speaker 3>I've Ben Rice finishing six and he's got twenty nine

0:18:46.600 --> 0:18:50.040
<v Speaker 3>jacks this year. Wilson controlls per Ballpark. Powell has the

0:18:50.080 --> 0:18:53.119
<v Speaker 3>most no doubter home runs. It's the most that have

0:18:53.160 --> 0:18:55.800
<v Speaker 3>gone over four hundred and twenty feet this year, so

0:18:56.000 --> 0:18:58.680
<v Speaker 3>and then Jordan Walker, Jack Haglion and the rest. It's

0:18:58.720 --> 0:19:03.879
<v Speaker 3>like he just doesn't compare batted ball data wise to

0:19:04.119 --> 0:19:08.040
<v Speaker 3>these guys. It is just it's Harper in Philly. Yeah,

0:19:08.080 --> 0:19:11.080
<v Speaker 3>so I'm not even really debating you because saying the

0:19:11.080 --> 0:19:15.960
<v Speaker 3>words Harper and Philly at the derby, I do like it.

0:19:16.640 --> 0:19:18.679
<v Speaker 3>I did bet him to get bounced in the first round, though,

0:19:18.720 --> 0:19:20.600
<v Speaker 3>I will admit bounce walkers round.

0:19:21.080 --> 0:19:23.399
<v Speaker 1>Walker's ability to move the bat at just such an

0:19:23.400 --> 0:19:25.479
<v Speaker 1>elite level. I mean, if not for Junior Commonero, he's

0:19:25.520 --> 0:19:28.560
<v Speaker 1>the guy that's moving the bad consistently the fastest in

0:19:29.160 --> 0:19:31.680
<v Speaker 1>Major League Baseball right now, with an average bat speed

0:19:31.760 --> 0:19:34.040
<v Speaker 1>north of seventy nine. Him and Junior are the only

0:19:34.040 --> 0:19:36.959
<v Speaker 1>two guys in that department. So that part of it,

0:19:37.000 --> 0:19:40.000
<v Speaker 1>I think there's gonna be a way that Jordan Walker

0:19:40.000 --> 0:19:42.919
<v Speaker 1>inserts himself into this in terms of maybe he has

0:19:42.960 --> 0:19:45.000
<v Speaker 1>one of the longest home runs, maybe he has like

0:19:45.520 --> 0:19:49.840
<v Speaker 1>a really good round. I just I can't overlook Jordan

0:19:49.920 --> 0:19:52.440
<v Speaker 1>Walker in this whole thing, and I just think he's

0:19:52.480 --> 0:19:54.639
<v Speaker 1>going to give you a nice little run, even he

0:19:54.680 --> 0:19:56.199
<v Speaker 1>might have a just a really good first round, and

0:19:56.200 --> 0:19:58.120
<v Speaker 1>it's like just he gets beaten by a better round.

0:19:58.160 --> 0:19:59.480
<v Speaker 1>I think we're just going to see a good showing

0:19:59.520 --> 0:20:02.399
<v Speaker 1>from Jordan, but I wanted to shout that out. I

0:20:02.440 --> 0:20:05.320
<v Speaker 1>think Murakami has a chance to do something really special here,

0:20:05.520 --> 0:20:07.720
<v Speaker 1>and that's where I keep going back to. But soa

0:20:07.760 --> 0:20:11.520
<v Speaker 1>can CAGs, and so can Schwarber. So my mind goes everywhere,

0:20:11.520 --> 0:20:12.520
<v Speaker 1>and I think this is going to be one of

0:20:12.560 --> 0:20:14.240
<v Speaker 1>the most competitive journeys we've ever had.

0:20:15.240 --> 0:20:17.800
<v Speaker 3>I agree, But Jack, what I was going back to

0:20:17.840 --> 0:20:20.760
<v Speaker 3>the beginning, right, you simulated two hundred thousand times, you

0:20:20.880 --> 0:20:23.200
<v Speaker 3>drink eight beers and you go to Citizens Bank Park,

0:20:23.280 --> 0:20:26.080
<v Speaker 3>and they all come to the same conclusion. Schwar bombs

0:20:26.080 --> 0:20:29.440
<v Speaker 3>Warber at the Yeah, Schwarber at the bank. Because I'm

0:20:29.440 --> 0:20:31.960
<v Speaker 3>also looking at you know, from even a betting angle,

0:20:32.000 --> 0:20:35.240
<v Speaker 3>Schwarber is the odds on favorite, but my model says

0:20:35.280 --> 0:20:38.240
<v Speaker 3>he should be like the definitive favorite, like he's even

0:20:38.320 --> 0:20:41.680
<v Speaker 3>undervalued because they're trying to balance the odds across the rest.

0:20:41.760 --> 0:20:44.200
<v Speaker 3>Like I think Ben Rice is even overvalued. I think

0:20:44.200 --> 0:20:47.119
<v Speaker 3>Wilson Gatreroz is overvalued. I think Bryce Harper is overvalued.

0:20:47.200 --> 0:20:50.280
<v Speaker 3>I think Jeordan Walker is overvalued. And in most simulations,

0:20:51.720 --> 0:20:54.879
<v Speaker 3>Kyle Schuber wins it. So I'm going with Schwarber exactly.

0:20:54.960 --> 0:20:57.400
<v Speaker 3>That met like the guy at the top. See you're

0:20:57.440 --> 0:20:58.840
<v Speaker 3>the guy at the top right now.

0:20:59.400 --> 0:21:02.879
<v Speaker 4>Yeah, you're the guys. It's the it's the Bell curve.

0:21:03.440 --> 0:21:06.359
<v Speaker 4>It's the dumb It's the dumb. All lies in the

0:21:06.520 --> 0:21:10.639
<v Speaker 4>middle being angry the bell curve meme. Everybody in the

0:21:10.640 --> 0:21:12.359
<v Speaker 4>middle is like, oh, I hate this. There are so

0:21:12.359 --> 0:21:15.359
<v Speaker 4>many different ways this could go like that.

0:21:15.480 --> 0:21:17.600
<v Speaker 3>And then it's like, no, it's just schwar bobs in Philly.

0:21:17.640 --> 0:21:18.840
<v Speaker 3>So Kylee s Forwarber is my pick.

0:21:20.440 --> 0:21:23.360
<v Speaker 1>I as much as I want to kind of make

0:21:23.400 --> 0:21:26.200
<v Speaker 1>the same pick, I really do think Schwarber is is

0:21:26.280 --> 0:21:29.480
<v Speaker 1>kind of the most likely scenario there. But for the

0:21:29.520 --> 0:21:33.040
<v Speaker 1>sake of being different different, I'm gonna go I'm gonna

0:21:33.040 --> 0:21:36.359
<v Speaker 1>go Murrakami here. I think Markami puts on a special

0:21:36.400 --> 0:21:37.600
<v Speaker 1>show Jack.

0:21:37.640 --> 0:21:40.080
<v Speaker 4>For the sake of copying Orham, I'm sticking with my

0:21:40.160 --> 0:21:40.960
<v Speaker 4>Murrakami pick.

0:21:41.359 --> 0:21:46.840
<v Speaker 3>I like Murakami. Can I ben on a runner up? Yeah?

0:21:47.160 --> 0:21:47.560
<v Speaker 1>Do whatever?

0:21:47.680 --> 0:21:50.720
<v Speaker 3>Junior I think I think Junior is the runner up again.

0:21:51.880 --> 0:21:54.159
<v Speaker 3>The way Junior backspins Baseball's like that was something that

0:21:54.240 --> 0:21:55.920
<v Speaker 3>I think I've said that on the podcast now four

0:21:56.000 --> 0:22:00.160
<v Speaker 3>or five, maybe seven thousand times. Dude, backspins baseball's differently,

0:22:00.280 --> 0:22:01.760
<v Speaker 3>the batspeed is out of control.

0:22:02.440 --> 0:22:06.040
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, and it's just did you account for average spin

0:22:06.160 --> 0:22:08.359
<v Speaker 1>orientation on in your model?

0:22:08.840 --> 0:22:13.520
<v Speaker 3>Every number? Every number, even numbers that haven't been invented yet. Really,

0:22:13.920 --> 0:22:15.320
<v Speaker 3>I can't tell you. I'd have to kill you.

0:22:17.480 --> 0:22:21.080
<v Speaker 1>I think that. Yeah, I cank got into my head.

0:22:21.119 --> 0:22:23.399
<v Speaker 1>I'm going Schwarber, but I'm going Marikkami.

0:22:23.920 --> 0:22:25.080
<v Speaker 3>How does how does claude work?

0:22:25.119 --> 0:22:25.199
<v Speaker 1>Like?

0:22:25.200 --> 0:22:27.840
<v Speaker 3>Could you text me a link to this prompt? And

0:22:27.920 --> 0:22:32.320
<v Speaker 3>I could just like, yes, absolutely, yeah, please text me

0:22:32.400 --> 0:22:34.959
<v Speaker 3>the link to. I was telling ARM two, like making

0:22:35.000 --> 0:22:38.359
<v Speaker 3>this model is more fun than actually betting the Derby.

0:22:39.160 --> 0:22:41.720
<v Speaker 4>It's like it's like the people that love fantasy mock drafts, right,

0:22:41.760 --> 0:22:43.159
<v Speaker 4>it's fantasy mock draft season.

0:22:44.440 --> 0:22:47.040
<v Speaker 3>Oh that's a love it. In comparison though, it's like

0:22:47.320 --> 0:22:49.680
<v Speaker 3>mock draft is your actual drafter for you're all nervous,

0:22:49.800 --> 0:22:51.600
<v Speaker 3>but the mock draft you're doing through all these different

0:22:51.640 --> 0:22:55.080
<v Speaker 3>scenarios that it's so much fun. So I'm going with Schwarber, Arms,

0:22:55.080 --> 0:22:57.840
<v Speaker 3>go with Mrkkami, Jack's going with Mark COMMI I will

0:22:57.840 --> 0:22:59.880
<v Speaker 3>pick a runner up as well. I kind of want

0:22:59.880 --> 0:23:02.840
<v Speaker 3>to go with Murrakami, but I also want to go

0:23:02.880 --> 0:23:05.119
<v Speaker 3>with CAGs, so to be different, I'll go with Kags

0:23:05.160 --> 0:23:05.920
<v Speaker 3>as my runner up.

0:23:06.119 --> 0:23:09.280
<v Speaker 1>N nice. Yeah, I think Schwarmrsu Murakami and what could

0:23:09.280 --> 0:23:12.360
<v Speaker 1>be an all time showdown would be special.

0:23:12.400 --> 0:23:14.879
<v Speaker 3>I hope the bracket sets up that way. I agree,

0:23:15.280 --> 0:23:17.280
<v Speaker 3>So make sure to go check out the Home Run derby. Obviously,

0:23:17.320 --> 0:23:19.159
<v Speaker 3>if you're watching the show, you're probably gonna watch the

0:23:19.200 --> 0:23:21.600
<v Speaker 3>Home Run Derby and also check us out at Other

0:23:21.720 --> 0:23:27.199
<v Speaker 3>Half Brewing the day after the derby, Tuesday, July fourteenth,

0:23:27.240 --> 0:23:30.560
<v Speaker 3>at seven pm Eastern. The boys are going to be

0:23:30.560 --> 0:23:33.920
<v Speaker 3>at Other Half Brewing five dollars select beers. That should

0:23:33.920 --> 0:23:35.800
<v Speaker 3>be enough to get you out there, but we're also

0:23:35.840 --> 0:23:37.960
<v Speaker 3>going to be live MB trivia. We're going to be

0:23:37.960 --> 0:23:40.600
<v Speaker 3>given out prizes. The Marine Layer Pod guys are going

0:23:40.600 --> 0:23:42.680
<v Speaker 3>to be there at the entire Just Baseball staff. A

0:23:42.760 --> 0:23:46.320
<v Speaker 3>bunch of people have rsvped already to head out to

0:23:46.520 --> 0:23:50.040
<v Speaker 3>our event. Again. It's at Other Half Brewing in Philly

0:23:50.480 --> 0:23:55.280
<v Speaker 3>Tuesday July fourteenth, from seven pm to eleven pm. We

0:23:55.400 --> 0:23:58.800
<v Speaker 3>hope to see everybody there all right, Arm and I

0:23:58.840 --> 0:24:03.360
<v Speaker 3>are going to talk about drafts superlatives, and Jack has

0:24:03.440 --> 0:24:06.040
<v Speaker 3>to go take a flight, so he won't talk about

0:24:06.040 --> 0:24:08.400
<v Speaker 3>the draft with us, but it's going to be really

0:24:08.440 --> 0:24:10.960
<v Speaker 3>fun and podcast p I'm curious that we can hear

0:24:11.000 --> 0:24:13.840
<v Speaker 3>from our friends from Hampton Farms before we talk about

0:24:13.840 --> 0:24:14.280
<v Speaker 3>the draft.

0:24:15.280 --> 0:24:18.199
<v Speaker 1>The best power hitters in the game pride themselves on

0:24:18.240 --> 0:24:21.600
<v Speaker 1>swinging hard and maximizing exsit velocity, and they can't do

0:24:21.720 --> 0:24:25.600
<v Speaker 1>that without muscle. Hampton Farms in shell peanuts are a

0:24:25.640 --> 0:24:29.160
<v Speaker 1>great source of protein, with seven grams in every serving,

0:24:29.400 --> 0:24:32.199
<v Speaker 1>America's number one brand of in shell peanuts gives you

0:24:32.240 --> 0:24:35.040
<v Speaker 1>the fuel and strength you need to attack your day

0:24:35.480 --> 0:24:39.119
<v Speaker 1>like the pros. Hampton Farms peanuts fun to crack, better

0:24:39.200 --> 0:24:41.760
<v Speaker 1>to eat, find a bag in your produce atile or

0:24:41.800 --> 0:24:45.880
<v Speaker 1>take twenty five percent off online at Hamptonfarms dot com

0:24:45.920 --> 0:24:50.040
<v Speaker 1>with code just Baseball. That's one word, just baseball for

0:24:50.160 --> 0:24:51.440
<v Speaker 1>twenty five percent off.

0:24:52.880 --> 0:24:58.040
<v Speaker 3>Arm Draft superlatives. So, like we said at the beginning

0:24:58.080 --> 0:25:00.760
<v Speaker 3>of the show, we did a three hour live stream.

0:25:00.920 --> 0:25:05.040
<v Speaker 3>We went through every single pick with our thoughts, and

0:25:05.080 --> 0:25:06.840
<v Speaker 3>now we've had some time to kind of sit with

0:25:06.880 --> 0:25:12.439
<v Speaker 3>these opinions. Right. Yeah, And I'm really excited because we

0:25:12.680 --> 0:25:16.320
<v Speaker 3>have the biggest winner of the draft, the biggest head

0:25:16.440 --> 0:25:19.760
<v Speaker 3>scratcher pick, because you made a really good point when

0:25:19.760 --> 0:25:24.600
<v Speaker 3>we were talking about the topics. Everybody wants to talk about, Oh,

0:25:24.680 --> 0:25:28.200
<v Speaker 3>this team lost the draft or this pick was terrible.

0:25:28.760 --> 0:25:32.520
<v Speaker 3>We have no idea. Let's not pretend, folks, that we

0:25:32.640 --> 0:25:36.760
<v Speaker 3>have any idea how this eighteen year old high schooler

0:25:37.160 --> 0:25:40.680
<v Speaker 3>is going to develop at the time. Could we disagree

0:25:41.880 --> 0:25:46.439
<v Speaker 3>is the away from consensus? Sure? Sure, but we're not

0:25:46.480 --> 0:25:48.560
<v Speaker 3>going to call it a bad pick because we don't

0:25:48.600 --> 0:25:50.399
<v Speaker 3>know what the team saw that maybe we don't have

0:25:50.480 --> 0:25:51.040
<v Speaker 3>access to.

0:25:51.600 --> 0:25:53.199
<v Speaker 1>That's the biggest thing. I was going to say, Like,

0:25:54.240 --> 0:25:55.720
<v Speaker 1>we might be right. I might be right if I

0:25:55.720 --> 0:25:59.520
<v Speaker 1>don't like the pick, but they know that player more

0:25:59.520 --> 0:26:01.800
<v Speaker 1>intimately than I do, so maybe there's something they know.

0:26:01.880 --> 0:26:04.520
<v Speaker 1>So we could say it's a head scratcher. But yeah,

0:26:04.560 --> 0:26:06.800
<v Speaker 1>I just can't subscribe to like you're the loser of

0:26:06.840 --> 0:26:09.640
<v Speaker 1>the thing that we don't even have any results yet

0:26:09.640 --> 0:26:11.840
<v Speaker 1>of how it may go exactly.

0:26:12.040 --> 0:26:14.560
<v Speaker 3>And so we have the best value pick, we have

0:26:14.600 --> 0:26:17.800
<v Speaker 3>the best fit, we have the most underrated pick. We

0:26:17.880 --> 0:26:20.199
<v Speaker 3>have the highest ceiling of a player in this draft

0:26:20.280 --> 0:26:23.560
<v Speaker 3>and also the highest floor. We also have quickest MLB

0:26:23.800 --> 0:26:28.399
<v Speaker 3>and the biggest boom or bust prospect. So arm let's

0:26:28.400 --> 0:26:31.199
<v Speaker 3>start at the top. Who was the biggest winner of

0:26:31.240 --> 0:26:32.600
<v Speaker 3>the twenty twenty six draft.

0:26:33.160 --> 0:26:35.520
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, I gotta go with it with a chalky answer,

0:26:35.560 --> 0:26:37.720
<v Speaker 1>and I'm going to go with the team that had,

0:26:37.840 --> 0:26:40.959
<v Speaker 1>you know, bonus pool allocation that was like the size

0:26:40.960 --> 0:26:43.160
<v Speaker 1>of the GDP of like a small country. And it's

0:26:43.160 --> 0:26:45.399
<v Speaker 1>the Chicago White Sox. You had the number one overall pick,

0:26:45.640 --> 0:26:49.560
<v Speaker 1>but then you also have just a ridiculous amount of

0:26:49.600 --> 0:26:51.240
<v Speaker 1>bonus pool money. Right, they go out and they make

0:26:51.280 --> 0:26:53.720
<v Speaker 1>that trade, They trade Jacob Gonzalez, they get the compa

0:26:53.840 --> 0:26:56.399
<v Speaker 1>pick to add a couple more million, you know, into

0:26:56.480 --> 0:26:59.640
<v Speaker 1>their bonus pool, to put it over twenty million dollars.

0:27:00.040 --> 0:27:01.440
<v Speaker 1>What do they do? They go out, they take the

0:27:01.520 --> 0:27:04.000
<v Speaker 1>number one player in the class or you know what

0:27:04.280 --> 0:27:06.920
<v Speaker 1>viewed by many as the number one player in the class.

0:27:07.080 --> 0:27:10.760
<v Speaker 1>Then they go out and get a bunch of high upside,

0:27:10.880 --> 0:27:13.680
<v Speaker 1>exciting prepsters beyond that where you'll get land and tell

0:27:13.720 --> 0:27:15.800
<v Speaker 1>me which was like a shoe in to be added

0:27:15.840 --> 0:27:17.320
<v Speaker 1>to the fold. Of course, son of Jim, tell me

0:27:17.520 --> 0:27:19.000
<v Speaker 1>cole Prose's a guy that I think a lot of

0:27:19.040 --> 0:27:20.879
<v Speaker 1>people are excited about and they're gonna have to pay

0:27:20.880 --> 0:27:23.320
<v Speaker 1>a pretty penny to be able to add Alex Weinngartner,

0:27:23.520 --> 0:27:27.520
<v Speaker 1>another prepster from Jersey that has tons of upside that

0:27:27.560 --> 0:27:29.760
<v Speaker 1>they're excited to be able to sign, and again won't

0:27:29.800 --> 0:27:33.440
<v Speaker 1>come cheap. There's several other prepsters that they took within

0:27:33.480 --> 0:27:36.120
<v Speaker 1>the first fifteen picks that they are able to use

0:27:36.359 --> 0:27:40.080
<v Speaker 1>their all time bonus pool, you know, bonus pool value

0:27:40.200 --> 0:27:42.720
<v Speaker 1>to be able to sign these guys away from college commitments.

0:27:42.960 --> 0:27:46.800
<v Speaker 1>You have, again one of the more accomplished college bats

0:27:46.800 --> 0:27:48.520
<v Speaker 1>at the top, one of the best shortstop prospects we've

0:27:48.520 --> 0:27:51.240
<v Speaker 1>seen in a very long time, and then you've got

0:27:51.320 --> 0:27:54.439
<v Speaker 1>all of these high upside high school kids behind that

0:27:54.440 --> 0:27:57.000
<v Speaker 1>that I think is really really exciting, mixing some college

0:27:57.040 --> 0:27:59.000
<v Speaker 1>pieces as well. But I think just the way of

0:27:59.040 --> 0:28:01.600
<v Speaker 1>balancing out number one pick in the draft with a

0:28:01.640 --> 0:28:04.320
<v Speaker 1>ton of high upside prepsters, it's hard to argue against

0:28:04.320 --> 0:28:06.960
<v Speaker 1>the White Sox being the team that you know, brought

0:28:06.960 --> 0:28:09.080
<v Speaker 1>in the most talent to their organization. And that's what

0:28:09.119 --> 0:28:10.720
<v Speaker 1>twenty and a half million dollars can do.

0:28:10.720 --> 0:28:12.800
<v Speaker 3>For you, one hundred percent. And I also loved the

0:28:12.880 --> 0:28:16.120
<v Speaker 3>pick of Joey Voulsko. He's pitched trut of the University

0:28:16.200 --> 0:28:18.440
<v Speaker 3>of Georgia. He was one of my favorite pitchers to

0:28:18.480 --> 0:28:20.320
<v Speaker 3>watch last year in college baseball, and I was shocked

0:28:20.320 --> 0:28:22.639
<v Speaker 3>to see him go at pick seventy seven. But I

0:28:22.680 --> 0:28:25.040
<v Speaker 3>also think there was the biggest loser that we didn't mention,

0:28:25.200 --> 0:28:30.400
<v Speaker 3>and it's Rob Manfred when he mispronounced Rock Chalouski Arm.

0:28:30.480 --> 0:28:34.639
<v Speaker 3>He's the Commissioner of Baseball and he's mispronouncing the number

0:28:34.680 --> 0:28:38.200
<v Speaker 3>one pick and what I guess was the number one

0:28:38.200 --> 0:28:40.640
<v Speaker 3>pick for what the last year, and he messes up

0:28:40.640 --> 0:28:43.320
<v Speaker 3>his name. Dude. I mean, it's inexcuseable.

0:28:43.400 --> 0:28:45.560
<v Speaker 1>It's crazy because we were at the Futures Games day

0:28:45.560 --> 0:28:48.720
<v Speaker 1>and they put up like a highlight reel like we're

0:28:48.760 --> 0:28:51.840
<v Speaker 1>just promoting the draft in the recent picks, and like

0:28:52.320 --> 0:28:55.840
<v Speaker 1>very obviously, they didn't show the one to one pick.

0:28:55.920 --> 0:28:58.280
<v Speaker 1>They went straight to like the number two pick, which

0:28:58.400 --> 0:29:01.920
<v Speaker 1>was you know, him saying, here's Grady Emerson or whoever

0:29:01.920 --> 0:29:04.040
<v Speaker 1>it was like with the number two pick, is Grady Emerson.

0:29:04.240 --> 0:29:07.240
<v Speaker 1>The fact that for the remainder of time now, like

0:29:07.280 --> 0:29:10.120
<v Speaker 1>any Rock Cholaski edit that the White Socks do, or

0:29:10.160 --> 0:29:11.920
<v Speaker 1>that any team does, or you know that the league

0:29:11.960 --> 0:29:14.040
<v Speaker 1>wants to do, and it's so classic. You always see

0:29:14.040 --> 0:29:16.440
<v Speaker 1>like where it all began, right with the number one

0:29:16.480 --> 0:29:19.240
<v Speaker 1>pick and it's Rock Chowlaski, and then it goes into

0:29:19.280 --> 0:29:20.680
<v Speaker 1>the minor leagues and the majors and you see the

0:29:20.680 --> 0:29:22.400
<v Speaker 1>whole progression, like we've seen those types of edits with

0:29:22.400 --> 0:29:24.080
<v Speaker 1>Bobby Witt and all these different guys all the time

0:29:24.800 --> 0:29:28.400
<v Speaker 1>that you can't do that beyond that. And obviously Rock

0:29:28.480 --> 0:29:30.160
<v Speaker 1>was thrilled. He saw him get so emotional and it

0:29:30.200 --> 0:29:33.000
<v Speaker 1>was just a special time for him regardless. But dude,

0:29:33.080 --> 0:29:35.240
<v Speaker 1>this is the most special, like one of the most

0:29:35.240 --> 0:29:37.600
<v Speaker 1>special days of his entire life, maybe the most at

0:29:37.600 --> 0:29:40.920
<v Speaker 1>this point for him. And you're the commission Major League Baseball.

0:29:41.000 --> 0:29:42.600
<v Speaker 1>The only thing you have to do is just pronounce

0:29:42.640 --> 0:29:44.440
<v Speaker 1>his name. Right. It's just like a basic human right.

0:29:44.480 --> 0:29:47.760
<v Speaker 1>We have just to pronounce our names, right. I think

0:29:47.800 --> 0:29:51.400
<v Speaker 1>that is one of the most embarrassing faux pause I

0:29:51.440 --> 0:29:54.080
<v Speaker 1>can remember the commissioner of any sport in a long time,

0:29:54.120 --> 0:29:55.480
<v Speaker 1>and it may not seem like that big of a deal,

0:29:55.600 --> 0:29:58.600
<v Speaker 1>but this was like the obvious one to one candidate,

0:29:58.680 --> 0:30:00.440
<v Speaker 1>and if it didn't go one, you he was going

0:30:00.440 --> 0:30:03.720
<v Speaker 1>in the top three picks. Has he never said his

0:30:03.840 --> 0:30:07.240
<v Speaker 1>name once until that point? What? What happened? How does

0:30:07.280 --> 0:30:09.640
<v Speaker 1>that happen? I think it's inexcusable and to me, like,

0:30:10.680 --> 0:30:13.240
<v Speaker 1>I can't think of a justification for it other than

0:30:13.680 --> 0:30:14.760
<v Speaker 1>Manfred just didn't care.

0:30:16.400 --> 0:30:18.560
<v Speaker 3>I think that's the biggest blunder since the twenty twenty

0:30:18.600 --> 0:30:22.760
<v Speaker 3>four All Star Game when that woman's saying the national anthem.

0:30:23.240 --> 0:30:25.720
<v Speaker 3>Remember that was that the frigging no. Do you remember

0:30:25.720 --> 0:30:28.400
<v Speaker 3>when the woman was intoxicating?

0:30:28.480 --> 0:30:31.360
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, yeah, she was not, she was Yeah. That was bad.

0:30:32.320 --> 0:30:32.880
<v Speaker 1>That was bad.

0:30:33.080 --> 0:30:36.160
<v Speaker 3>Yeah. I think that is the biggest blunder since then

0:30:36.400 --> 0:30:38.640
<v Speaker 3>on the public stage of an MLB event.

0:30:39.000 --> 0:30:43.320
<v Speaker 1>Better or worse than calling the World Series Trophy a

0:30:43.360 --> 0:30:44.080
<v Speaker 1>hunk of metal.

0:30:46.800 --> 0:30:48.960
<v Speaker 3>I think it's the same. It's just all garbage. It's

0:30:49.040 --> 0:30:50.720
<v Speaker 3>just all horrible looks for everybody.

0:30:51.120 --> 0:30:52.040
<v Speaker 1>I think it's worse.

0:30:54.040 --> 0:30:55.800
<v Speaker 3>It might be worse. I mean they're all bad. It's

0:30:55.840 --> 0:30:59.280
<v Speaker 3>like they're all zero out of tens the number one,

0:30:59.440 --> 0:31:01.800
<v Speaker 3>they're all zero. Yeah, it's the number one pick. I

0:31:01.800 --> 0:31:04.360
<v Speaker 3>don't know what. I can't believe they did that or

0:31:04.600 --> 0:31:07.480
<v Speaker 3>Rob Manford did that? All right? My biggest winner was

0:31:07.480 --> 0:31:09.960
<v Speaker 3>also the White Sox for basically everything that you said.

0:31:10.240 --> 0:31:12.680
<v Speaker 3>When you have the most bonus pull money, you pick

0:31:12.800 --> 0:31:17.760
<v Speaker 3>number one overall, the fan base goes wild. That's the

0:31:17.760 --> 0:31:20.200
<v Speaker 3>biggest winner of the draft. There were plenty of other winners.

0:31:20.240 --> 0:31:22.160
<v Speaker 3>A lot of teams had really good drafts. Was there

0:31:22.200 --> 0:31:23.760
<v Speaker 3>any that off the top of your mind, Like, I'm

0:31:23.800 --> 0:31:25.840
<v Speaker 3>sure the White Sox were the biggest winner, but there

0:31:25.880 --> 0:31:27.080
<v Speaker 3>was plenty of winners.

0:31:27.400 --> 0:31:29.840
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, you know, I loved Oakland or oh, I love

0:31:29.880 --> 0:31:33.959
<v Speaker 1>the Athletics draft. You know, Drew Burris slipping quote unquote

0:31:33.960 --> 0:31:35.840
<v Speaker 1>to eight might sound crazy to say slip, but I

0:31:35.920 --> 0:31:38.080
<v Speaker 1>just I just love what he's able to bring to

0:31:38.120 --> 0:31:39.720
<v Speaker 1>the table. And I think he's a guy that you

0:31:39.840 --> 0:31:41.840
<v Speaker 1>should have won a couple of picks earlier so to

0:31:41.880 --> 0:31:43.480
<v Speaker 1>be able to get him. And then Mason Edwards to

0:31:43.560 --> 0:31:47.000
<v Speaker 1>grab you know, the lefty there at the forty seventh pick,

0:31:47.120 --> 0:31:49.000
<v Speaker 1>and then gave Gackle, Like, I just love their top

0:31:49.040 --> 0:31:51.200
<v Speaker 1>three picks a lot. I think Roman Martin's a sneaky

0:31:51.200 --> 0:31:53.680
<v Speaker 1>guy that they got in the fourth round. You know,

0:31:53.880 --> 0:31:56.520
<v Speaker 1>it's kind of a little bit shocky college guys, but

0:31:56.640 --> 0:31:58.680
<v Speaker 1>I think all guys that they were very happy and

0:31:58.760 --> 0:32:01.000
<v Speaker 1>fortunate to have kind of like and where they landed.

0:32:01.040 --> 0:32:05.040
<v Speaker 1>So I really liked the Athletics draft, and I even thought,

0:32:05.120 --> 0:32:08.520
<v Speaker 1>you know that the Brewers as always like they're going

0:32:08.600 --> 0:32:10.160
<v Speaker 1>to have and we're gonna talk about them a little

0:32:10.160 --> 0:32:12.400
<v Speaker 1>bit more because there's some overlap here. But the tray

0:32:12.480 --> 0:32:15.680
<v Speaker 1>Evil fit is cool because you know, his brother Brady

0:32:15.760 --> 0:32:17.760
<v Speaker 1>is you know, really been tearing it up in the

0:32:17.760 --> 0:32:20.200
<v Speaker 1>Brewer system, and I know they love him Strasneider will

0:32:20.200 --> 0:32:21.480
<v Speaker 1>talk about a little bit later we but to be

0:32:21.480 --> 0:32:23.680
<v Speaker 1>able to get him in the second round a knack

0:32:23.760 --> 0:32:25.440
<v Speaker 1>with their fifth round pick was exciting. I know there's

0:32:25.440 --> 0:32:28.160
<v Speaker 1>several other picks that Tyler was really bullish on as well.

0:32:28.200 --> 0:32:30.400
<v Speaker 1>The Brewers always do quite a good job. But it

0:32:30.440 --> 0:32:33.280
<v Speaker 1>was funny going through it. You know, every team's process

0:32:33.280 --> 0:32:35.920
<v Speaker 1>has just become so refined that you can look at

0:32:35.920 --> 0:32:38.440
<v Speaker 1>every draft and kind of understand what they were thinking,

0:32:38.440 --> 0:32:39.960
<v Speaker 1>how they were approaching it, and you know, kind of

0:32:39.960 --> 0:32:41.440
<v Speaker 1>get behind it. Yeah.

0:32:41.480 --> 0:32:45.680
<v Speaker 3>Absolutely, And sorry, I just got thrown off a little

0:32:45.680 --> 0:32:47.920
<v Speaker 3>bit because my computer is about to die. Folks were

0:32:47.920 --> 0:32:50.080
<v Speaker 3>in Philly. You know, things are a little bit messed up.

0:32:50.080 --> 0:32:52.000
<v Speaker 3>We're trying to give you the best live stream possible.

0:32:52.160 --> 0:32:54.400
<v Speaker 3>But before I plug in my laptop. Let's talk about

0:32:54.440 --> 0:32:57.920
<v Speaker 3>the biggest head scratcher, biggest head scratcher in this draft,

0:32:58.920 --> 0:33:02.640
<v Speaker 3>the pick that just made you you don't understand. It's

0:33:02.640 --> 0:33:05.200
<v Speaker 3>not like it's a bad pick, because again, I don't

0:33:05.200 --> 0:33:06.880
<v Speaker 3>think any of us can call anything a bad pick

0:33:06.920 --> 0:33:09.320
<v Speaker 3>at this point. We already talked about that. But the

0:33:09.360 --> 0:33:12.200
<v Speaker 3>move the draft pick that just made you go, what.

0:33:13.640 --> 0:33:16.280
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, and you know like he could age really well.

0:33:16.560 --> 0:33:20.000
<v Speaker 1>And I would venture to guess that the I know

0:33:20.040 --> 0:33:23.800
<v Speaker 1>that the the Royals love Zion Rose, and so maybe

0:33:23.800 --> 0:33:26.400
<v Speaker 1>there's something there that that they see and and I

0:33:26.440 --> 0:33:28.400
<v Speaker 1>mean I what I do see with Zion Rose at

0:33:28.440 --> 0:33:31.280
<v Speaker 1>six overall is he's one of the better bat to

0:33:31.320 --> 0:33:34.560
<v Speaker 1>ball guys that we saw in this draft. My concern is,

0:33:35.360 --> 0:33:37.280
<v Speaker 1>while he's a good athlete, there's not a ton of

0:33:37.320 --> 0:33:40.000
<v Speaker 1>defensive value yet. I think there's there's some some hope

0:33:40.040 --> 0:33:41.800
<v Speaker 1>that he can maybe move over to center and give

0:33:41.840 --> 0:33:45.240
<v Speaker 1>you value there. But my concern with Rose is as

0:33:45.280 --> 0:33:46.960
<v Speaker 1>good as he is back to ball wise, I don't

0:33:46.960 --> 0:33:49.280
<v Speaker 1>know how much confidence I have in the consistency quality

0:33:49.280 --> 0:33:52.000
<v Speaker 1>of contact. Wise, he's not as good at being able

0:33:52.080 --> 0:33:54.680
<v Speaker 1>or to consistently pull the ball as you'd probably like

0:33:54.720 --> 0:33:56.560
<v Speaker 1>to see, and I think that limits him some. I

0:33:56.560 --> 0:33:58.680
<v Speaker 1>think that results in a lot more like inside out

0:33:58.680 --> 0:34:02.240
<v Speaker 1>swings and then you probably want to see. I do

0:34:02.320 --> 0:34:04.240
<v Speaker 1>have some concern that it's just gonna be an uphill

0:34:04.280 --> 0:34:06.280
<v Speaker 1>battle for Rose compared to some of the other guys

0:34:06.280 --> 0:34:07.880
<v Speaker 1>that were drafted in that range to get to that

0:34:07.920 --> 0:34:10.719
<v Speaker 1>three plus war plateau. He has tools, I know, the

0:34:10.760 --> 0:34:14.880
<v Speaker 1>makeup is lauded incredibly well. People really like what he

0:34:14.920 --> 0:34:16.919
<v Speaker 1>brings to the table. He's obviously a winner, Like there's

0:34:16.960 --> 0:34:19.080
<v Speaker 1>a lot of intangibles to like. But when you look

0:34:19.080 --> 0:34:20.760
<v Speaker 1>at what the Royals did after that, because you imagine

0:34:20.760 --> 0:34:22.399
<v Speaker 1>that's a big savings pick, Like a lot of people

0:34:22.440 --> 0:34:25.920
<v Speaker 1>thought that the Royals may get Rose with their thirtieth

0:34:26.000 --> 0:34:29.640
<v Speaker 1>overall selection, there wasn't like that clear, clear, clear cut,

0:34:29.960 --> 0:34:33.160
<v Speaker 1>you know, overslot guy that I think compensates for I

0:34:33.480 --> 0:34:35.200
<v Speaker 1>rab was a good pick. Like there's a couple other

0:34:35.239 --> 0:34:39.040
<v Speaker 1>guys that I know, you know, Tyler had mentioned, we're intriguing,

0:34:39.080 --> 0:34:40.960
<v Speaker 1>like Kendon Johnson. I'm sure he's going to get an

0:34:41.000 --> 0:34:43.439
<v Speaker 1>overslot deal. There's a couple other guys that you could

0:34:43.440 --> 0:34:44.840
<v Speaker 1>look at and say are probably going to get an

0:34:44.920 --> 0:34:47.560
<v Speaker 1>overslot deal. But at the same time, I don't know

0:34:47.600 --> 0:34:50.000
<v Speaker 1>if there was that clear cut man they were able

0:34:50.000 --> 0:34:51.759
<v Speaker 1>to snag him like they were able to get you

0:34:52.200 --> 0:34:54.000
<v Speaker 1>get by him down to the fourth round. Like you

0:34:54.040 --> 0:34:56.399
<v Speaker 1>google the Red Sox. What they do is Shaffner. There's

0:34:56.400 --> 0:34:58.279
<v Speaker 1>a couple guys that they bought down that I think

0:34:58.320 --> 0:35:00.800
<v Speaker 1>made it make a lot of sense with the Royals,

0:35:01.080 --> 0:35:03.759
<v Speaker 1>at least at this present moment, I don't see that

0:35:04.160 --> 0:35:06.160
<v Speaker 1>to make it make sense to go Zion Rose at

0:35:06.239 --> 0:35:08.440
<v Speaker 1>number six when you had some of the guys that

0:35:08.440 --> 0:35:10.360
<v Speaker 1>were available on the board, including you know, like a

0:35:10.440 --> 0:35:13.080
<v Speaker 1>Drew Burris or an Eric Booth.

0:35:13.920 --> 0:35:17.319
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, no, I think that is the answer. But if

0:35:17.320 --> 0:35:21.440
<v Speaker 3>I were to get a second pick in there, I

0:35:21.440 --> 0:35:23.759
<v Speaker 3>think I would go with the Mets taking Carson Wiggins.

0:35:24.080 --> 0:35:28.839
<v Speaker 3>And basically I'm looking at Tyler Jennings, who does such

0:35:28.880 --> 0:35:31.480
<v Speaker 3>a great job again at just baseball dot Com made

0:35:31.520 --> 0:35:34.480
<v Speaker 3>a big board of three hundred and thirteen prospects, and

0:35:34.520 --> 0:35:36.439
<v Speaker 3>with the twenty seventh pick in the draft, the Mets

0:35:36.520 --> 0:35:39.160
<v Speaker 3>drafted Carson Wiggins. He is ranked one hundred and forty

0:35:39.239 --> 0:35:42.879
<v Speaker 3>third on Tyler's big board. And it's not me necessarily

0:35:43.000 --> 0:35:45.240
<v Speaker 3>just looking at the big board and seeing the biggest difference.

0:35:45.840 --> 0:35:48.640
<v Speaker 3>It's also like this guy pitched at Arkansas and he's

0:35:48.719 --> 0:35:52.920
<v Speaker 3>mostly a two pitch guy. He's got this buzzsawv of fastball.

0:35:52.960 --> 0:35:54.719
<v Speaker 3>He's got a great fastball, there's no doubt about it.

0:35:54.760 --> 0:35:58.640
<v Speaker 3>That's I'm sure what Dave Stearnson company saw and said

0:35:58.680 --> 0:36:00.719
<v Speaker 3>we can build off that. Right now, he's kind of

0:36:00.760 --> 0:36:03.319
<v Speaker 3>working with a fastball that's in the upper nine. He's

0:36:03.360 --> 0:36:05.520
<v Speaker 3>even touched one hundred miles an hour and a really

0:36:05.520 --> 0:36:10.040
<v Speaker 3>really good slider. However, he only sometimes will toss in

0:36:10.080 --> 0:36:13.719
<v Speaker 3>a curveball, and he has major command issues. So you're

0:36:13.760 --> 0:36:17.359
<v Speaker 3>talking about a guy who has huge reliever risk in

0:36:17.400 --> 0:36:21.760
<v Speaker 3>the first round. And it's not reliever risk just because

0:36:21.760 --> 0:36:24.719
<v Speaker 3>he has command issues, but he has four pitches. It's

0:36:24.880 --> 0:36:28.160
<v Speaker 3>double reliever risk because he really only has two pitches.

0:36:28.800 --> 0:36:30.880
<v Speaker 3>And I just felt like at that part of the

0:36:31.000 --> 0:36:34.279
<v Speaker 3>draft again, it confused me. Could he go to the

0:36:34.320 --> 0:36:37.400
<v Speaker 3>Mets and they turn him around completely, They give him

0:36:37.440 --> 0:36:39.600
<v Speaker 3>one or two more pitches and they will find the

0:36:39.600 --> 0:36:42.120
<v Speaker 3>command and that fastball really plays up and he ends

0:36:42.160 --> 0:36:45.920
<v Speaker 3>up being a steal Absolutely. But at the current moment,

0:36:46.640 --> 0:36:49.279
<v Speaker 3>looking at Tyler's Big Board, ranked one hundred and forty three.

0:36:49.600 --> 0:36:52.520
<v Speaker 3>Watching him at Arkansas just be inconsistent and the command

0:36:52.600 --> 0:36:55.319
<v Speaker 3>was not there, knowing he has two pitches, I was

0:36:55.400 --> 0:36:59.200
<v Speaker 3>surprised to see him go again twenty seventh overall.

0:37:00.000 --> 0:37:03.279
<v Speaker 1>And I think another part of that equation was that

0:37:03.320 --> 0:37:05.759
<v Speaker 1>the health side a little bit clearly the Mets, who

0:37:05.840 --> 0:37:08.719
<v Speaker 1>have let medicals stop them from signing their first round

0:37:08.719 --> 0:37:10.279
<v Speaker 1>pick in the past. We'll see what happens here, but

0:37:10.400 --> 0:37:13.560
<v Speaker 1>I'd imagine that they're gonna They're gonna sign Wiggins. Yeah,

0:37:13.840 --> 0:37:17.120
<v Speaker 1>they clearly feel okay about it. There's a fun temple

0:37:17.239 --> 0:37:18.600
<v Speaker 1>to start with when you've got the heater. But I

0:37:18.640 --> 0:37:21.359
<v Speaker 1>agree with the time that he's missed with the lack

0:37:21.400 --> 0:37:25.000
<v Speaker 1>of polish. Overall, the Mets see something, and you know,

0:37:25.000 --> 0:37:27.960
<v Speaker 1>with pitchers especially like things changed so quickly as you

0:37:28.000 --> 0:37:30.640
<v Speaker 1>alluded to, so it could make sense quite quickly. But

0:37:30.719 --> 0:37:34.240
<v Speaker 1>at this present moment, I do agree that it could

0:37:34.320 --> 0:37:37.520
<v Speaker 1>seem like it may not be the best value at

0:37:37.520 --> 0:37:40.919
<v Speaker 1>this point because I also know that that Tyler didn't

0:37:40.920 --> 0:37:42.799
<v Speaker 1>love the Robbins pick either, and so it's like, if

0:37:42.800 --> 0:37:45.480
<v Speaker 1>you didn't flank that with a pick that maybe made

0:37:45.480 --> 0:37:47.000
<v Speaker 1>it make sense. If it's a savings pick on the

0:37:47.040 --> 0:37:49.279
<v Speaker 1>top as well, it can become a little bit more

0:37:49.280 --> 0:37:50.960
<v Speaker 1>of a head scratcher, exactly.

0:37:51.040 --> 0:37:53.000
<v Speaker 3>Let's move over to the next one, which is the

0:37:53.040 --> 0:37:56.719
<v Speaker 3>best value pick in the draft? Right? You know, we

0:37:56.719 --> 0:37:58.799
<v Speaker 3>could dive into the fifth and sixth round, but I'm

0:37:58.800 --> 0:38:01.200
<v Speaker 3>sure we're likely going to be focusing still on the

0:38:01.239 --> 0:38:03.320
<v Speaker 3>first couple of rounds unless you want to go deeper.

0:38:03.360 --> 0:38:05.200
<v Speaker 3>But who is your best value pick?

0:38:05.280 --> 0:38:05.440
<v Speaker 1>Right?

0:38:05.480 --> 0:38:08.040
<v Speaker 3>We're looking at was this guy draft in the second

0:38:08.080 --> 0:38:10.080
<v Speaker 3>you thought he should have gone to the first, you know,

0:38:10.239 --> 0:38:13.239
<v Speaker 3>signing bonus everything. Best value pick?

0:38:13.840 --> 0:38:17.080
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, I think it's probably Sawyer Strasneider just lent into

0:38:17.120 --> 0:38:20.759
<v Speaker 1>the Brewers where he did in the second round. With Strasneider,

0:38:20.960 --> 0:38:23.240
<v Speaker 1>I just I feel like there's a very exciting skill

0:38:23.280 --> 0:38:25.239
<v Speaker 1>set here. There's a little bit of concern that he

0:38:25.280 --> 0:38:27.200
<v Speaker 1>may swing and miss, but now you put him in

0:38:27.239 --> 0:38:29.839
<v Speaker 1>this organization with the Brewers that have just done such

0:38:29.880 --> 0:38:33.160
<v Speaker 1>an incredible job at developing hitters, and hey, you think

0:38:33.200 --> 0:38:35.319
<v Speaker 1>about that fit too. We're gonna talk about fit, but

0:38:35.520 --> 0:38:37.840
<v Speaker 1>just in general, you're getting a guy that I thought

0:38:37.840 --> 0:38:40.279
<v Speaker 1>was a top twenty player in the class, and you

0:38:40.280 --> 0:38:42.360
<v Speaker 1>could make a case was maybe a top fifteen player

0:38:42.400 --> 0:38:43.880
<v Speaker 1>in this class. I thought was one of the more

0:38:43.920 --> 0:38:46.680
<v Speaker 1>exciting of those Tier two bats, and you get him

0:38:46.680 --> 0:38:50.480
<v Speaker 1>at sixty six. I think that's a really good value

0:38:50.560 --> 0:38:54.719
<v Speaker 1>pick there by the Brewers, who just consistently draft quite well.

0:38:54.719 --> 0:38:56.960
<v Speaker 1>But the bat speed stands out to me. The bats

0:38:57.000 --> 0:38:59.319
<v Speaker 1>of ball. Again, there is some with concern, but the

0:38:59.360 --> 0:39:03.640
<v Speaker 1>contact right was right there with like a Ace Reese

0:39:04.000 --> 0:39:06.799
<v Speaker 1>and Tyler Bell, And so when you look at it

0:39:06.800 --> 0:39:10.279
<v Speaker 1>from that perspective, like you got him a lot later

0:39:10.320 --> 0:39:12.560
<v Speaker 1>than those guys, I think he's a better athlete than

0:39:12.560 --> 0:39:15.560
<v Speaker 1>he's getting credit for. Might give him some running center,

0:39:15.560 --> 0:39:18.000
<v Speaker 1>but ultimately I think you play a solid corner the Armstrong.

0:39:18.480 --> 0:39:20.240
<v Speaker 1>I just feel like the some of this guy's parts

0:39:20.280 --> 0:39:22.480
<v Speaker 1>are are are quite good, and I was so very

0:39:22.520 --> 0:39:25.799
<v Speaker 1>surprised to see him slide out of that first round.

0:39:25.800 --> 0:39:27.400
<v Speaker 1>And I do wonder if maybe the Brewers was able

0:39:27.440 --> 0:39:29.040
<v Speaker 1>to buy him down a little bit there with the

0:39:29.320 --> 0:39:30.319
<v Speaker 1>evil pick at the top.

0:39:30.800 --> 0:39:33.520
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, we're gonna get two best fits soon. And I

0:39:33.560 --> 0:39:35.480
<v Speaker 3>really love the fit with sort of show center with

0:39:35.520 --> 0:39:38.640
<v Speaker 3>the Brewers because I think there is hit tool concerns there.

0:39:39.280 --> 0:39:41.799
<v Speaker 3>Who's pretty good at teaching guys how to hit. Yeah,

0:39:42.000 --> 0:39:43.879
<v Speaker 3>Milwaukee Berds, they might be the best at it. Right,

0:39:44.040 --> 0:39:47.080
<v Speaker 3>the way they turned around Andrew Vaughn turned around a

0:39:47.160 --> 0:39:49.839
<v Speaker 3>number of guys, I mean, right, they get, you know,

0:39:50.400 --> 0:39:53.000
<v Speaker 3>a bunch of praise and deservedly so for turning around

0:39:53.040 --> 0:39:55.360
<v Speaker 3>all these pitchers. They're doing the same with the bats,

0:39:55.840 --> 0:39:58.759
<v Speaker 3>like Garrett Mitchell has been banged up and hurt and

0:39:59.280 --> 0:40:02.759
<v Speaker 3>incredibly consistent, but he just keeps getting better and better. Right,

0:40:02.760 --> 0:40:04.960
<v Speaker 3>They've turned around a number of guys. So for a

0:40:04.960 --> 0:40:07.200
<v Speaker 3>guy with hit tool concerns, with a lot of other tools,

0:40:07.719 --> 0:40:10.200
<v Speaker 3>to go over to the Brewers, it's hard not to

0:40:10.200 --> 0:40:14.759
<v Speaker 3>really like that one. My mine is another really good

0:40:14.840 --> 0:40:17.880
<v Speaker 3>organization with a guy that we talked about at length

0:40:18.640 --> 0:40:22.400
<v Speaker 3>on the draft stream. That's Bo Lawrence, Bo Lawrence whatever.

0:40:22.480 --> 0:40:24.800
<v Speaker 3>All I know is he's six for five, two hundred pounds,

0:40:25.600 --> 0:40:28.279
<v Speaker 3>and he's got a really really smooth swing. He's a

0:40:28.320 --> 0:40:32.080
<v Speaker 3>prep guy. But I think, and you correct me if

0:40:32.120 --> 0:40:35.280
<v Speaker 3>I'm wrong, here are the fact that he's an older eighteen,

0:40:35.680 --> 0:40:38.839
<v Speaker 3>that he's nineteen years old. Do you think that these

0:40:38.960 --> 0:40:41.560
<v Speaker 3>draft models who are trying to get guys in their

0:40:41.640 --> 0:40:46.120
<v Speaker 3>organizations younger and younger maybe overlooked him just because in

0:40:46.200 --> 0:40:49.439
<v Speaker 3>terms of the prep guys he's one of the older players.

0:40:50.600 --> 0:40:52.800
<v Speaker 1>It's it's interesting because, like even then, I feel like,

0:40:52.840 --> 0:40:56.440
<v Speaker 1>if you're on the right side of of nineteen, it's

0:40:56.520 --> 0:40:59.480
<v Speaker 1>such a crazy phrase to say you're generally going to

0:40:59.560 --> 0:41:02.200
<v Speaker 1>be five, but maybe that could bake into it. I

0:41:02.239 --> 0:41:04.120
<v Speaker 1>do know even a matter of a few months does

0:41:04.239 --> 0:41:08.520
<v Speaker 1>sway these draft models, generally speaking. But I think that

0:41:08.680 --> 0:41:11.000
<v Speaker 1>was a heck of a grab there for the Dodgers,

0:41:11.000 --> 0:41:14.200
<v Speaker 1>and I had him as my most underrated pick because

0:41:14.239 --> 0:41:16.520
<v Speaker 1>there's kind of an overlap there, because I mean, when

0:41:16.719 --> 0:41:19.839
<v Speaker 1>with Laurns, you're getting somebody that is six foot five

0:41:20.040 --> 0:41:23.240
<v Speaker 1>with a great feel to hit, that already has shown

0:41:23.280 --> 0:41:26.279
<v Speaker 1>improved athleticism, which you don't typically see for a guy

0:41:26.320 --> 0:41:29.440
<v Speaker 1>that's that lanky and big for his size. You just

0:41:29.480 --> 0:41:32.040
<v Speaker 1>see like the awkward baby draft thing. Instead, you have

0:41:32.080 --> 0:41:34.360
<v Speaker 1>a really smooth swing and a guy that's continued to

0:41:34.360 --> 0:41:36.359
<v Speaker 1>develop and move his feet better on the left side

0:41:36.400 --> 0:41:38.439
<v Speaker 1>of the infield. Probably gonna play third base, but looks

0:41:38.440 --> 0:41:39.880
<v Speaker 1>like he's gonna have a chance to stick there and

0:41:39.880 --> 0:41:42.560
<v Speaker 1>provide some value there. And then you think about how

0:41:42.600 --> 0:41:45.520
<v Speaker 1>much power he can grow into with such an easy

0:41:45.560 --> 0:41:47.799
<v Speaker 1>and smooth swing as he just continues to fill out

0:41:47.800 --> 0:41:49.759
<v Speaker 1>and yeah, just kind of generate a little bit more

0:41:49.800 --> 0:41:52.799
<v Speaker 1>whip and this could be a very fun combination of

0:41:52.880 --> 0:41:55.600
<v Speaker 1>hit and power. And you talk about an organization that

0:41:55.640 --> 0:41:59.319
<v Speaker 1>can help maximize that, I think you're gonna Seelronce be

0:41:59.320 --> 0:42:01.880
<v Speaker 1>able to get a lot more out of his base

0:42:01.960 --> 0:42:04.719
<v Speaker 1>and just to tap into more juice in an organization

0:42:04.800 --> 0:42:07.560
<v Speaker 1>like the Dodgers, who is just just consistently helped their players.

0:42:07.239 --> 0:42:11.000
<v Speaker 3>Do that, Dodgers getting value picks. I bet it's making

0:42:11.040 --> 0:42:15.000
<v Speaker 3>everybody in the YouTube chat just squirm. Thank you everybody

0:42:15.080 --> 0:42:17.880
<v Speaker 3>joining live here on YouTube. Hopefully you guys enjoyed the

0:42:17.960 --> 0:42:20.400
<v Speaker 3>draft stream yesterday and you're currently enjoying this dream. The

0:42:20.400 --> 0:42:22.839
<v Speaker 3>best way to support this dream for absolutely free, all

0:42:22.880 --> 0:42:25.560
<v Speaker 3>we ask just smash the like bundon and subscribe. And

0:42:25.600 --> 0:42:28.319
<v Speaker 3>if you're listening after the fact on audio, best way

0:42:28.360 --> 0:42:31.040
<v Speaker 3>to support the show for free is to leave a

0:42:31.200 --> 0:42:34.919
<v Speaker 3>five star review. All right, let's get over to best fit.

0:42:35.360 --> 0:42:37.960
<v Speaker 3>So a player like we've kind of already talked about

0:42:38.000 --> 0:42:40.000
<v Speaker 3>some of these guys where you know, it might be

0:42:40.040 --> 0:42:42.799
<v Speaker 3>a profile that has a problem, but they go to

0:42:42.840 --> 0:42:46.839
<v Speaker 3>an organization that's the best at fixing that problem. Arm

0:42:46.840 --> 0:42:48.880
<v Speaker 3>who's your best fit of the draft.

0:42:49.200 --> 0:42:52.120
<v Speaker 1>So for me, I want a little bit different from

0:42:52.239 --> 0:42:54.000
<v Speaker 1>that path because I do have a couple of guys

0:42:54.040 --> 0:42:55.920
<v Speaker 1>I didn't kind of fit that mold, and like Strasnider

0:42:56.000 --> 0:42:58.480
<v Speaker 1>is one of those. But in terms of the best fit,

0:42:58.600 --> 0:43:01.120
<v Speaker 1>I just thought about like kind of needing each other.

0:43:01.239 --> 0:43:04.920
<v Speaker 1>And I go to Jackson, Flora with the San Francisco Giants,

0:43:04.960 --> 0:43:07.040
<v Speaker 1>and you have a Bay Area kid. You have the

0:43:07.040 --> 0:43:09.880
<v Speaker 1>top right hander in the class and the top pitcher

0:43:09.880 --> 0:43:13.480
<v Speaker 1>in the class comfortably, and you have a Giants organization

0:43:14.200 --> 0:43:17.640
<v Speaker 1>that really needs pitching help. I mean, and we talk

0:43:17.680 --> 0:43:19.640
<v Speaker 1>about not really drafting on need shore, but like when

0:43:19.680 --> 0:43:21.480
<v Speaker 1>you think about the fit and what he brings to

0:43:21.520 --> 0:43:25.359
<v Speaker 1>this organization immediately, we just put out our Giants' top

0:43:25.360 --> 0:43:29.680
<v Speaker 1>fifteen prospects and they have two right handed pitching prospects

0:43:29.680 --> 0:43:32.840
<v Speaker 1>in the top fifteen, both are at low A. So

0:43:32.920 --> 0:43:34.480
<v Speaker 1>when you bring in a guy that could kind of

0:43:34.520 --> 0:43:36.959
<v Speaker 1>immediately you get assign him straight to the Texas League

0:43:37.000 --> 0:43:40.240
<v Speaker 1>to double A and just watch him overwhelm hitters. Also,

0:43:40.920 --> 0:43:44.880
<v Speaker 1>the fastball is clearly plus, the sleeper is gross, and

0:43:44.920 --> 0:43:47.239
<v Speaker 1>he has two variations of that breaking ball ones that

0:43:47.400 --> 0:43:50.320
<v Speaker 1>a little bit harder as well. That looks like it's gross,

0:43:50.600 --> 0:43:52.919
<v Speaker 1>and then you have a kick change that's developing as well.

0:43:53.080 --> 0:43:55.160
<v Speaker 1>I mean, he's just comfortably going to be the best

0:43:55.160 --> 0:43:58.560
<v Speaker 1>pitching prospect in that system. And their next best pitching

0:43:58.560 --> 0:44:01.640
<v Speaker 1>prospect is a righty with a nasty sweeper and a

0:44:01.640 --> 0:44:04.600
<v Speaker 1>good fastball and Kinder Martinez, but again he's at low A.

0:44:04.880 --> 0:44:07.120
<v Speaker 1>So I love what Flora brings there as a Bay

0:44:07.160 --> 0:44:10.279
<v Speaker 1>Area kid, and I'm sure he's thrilled to be, you know,

0:44:10.360 --> 0:44:13.240
<v Speaker 1>in that organization. It just felt like both both sides,

0:44:13.400 --> 0:44:14.680
<v Speaker 1>it just matched up perfectly.

0:44:15.080 --> 0:44:19.319
<v Speaker 3>I love that I tried to find a guy who

0:44:20.400 --> 0:44:23.919
<v Speaker 3>you know, has a couple of issues, but the team

0:44:23.960 --> 0:44:26.040
<v Speaker 3>that he went to are going to be able to

0:44:26.080 --> 0:44:29.480
<v Speaker 3>resolve those. And I thought a perfect example of that

0:44:29.600 --> 0:44:33.000
<v Speaker 3>was Liam Peterson going to the Cleveland Guardians. Because Liam

0:44:33.040 --> 0:44:37.200
<v Speaker 3>Peterson watching him at Florida, I was always just perpetually

0:44:37.239 --> 0:44:39.680
<v Speaker 3>disappointed in him, And I don't mean it in a

0:44:39.719 --> 0:44:43.520
<v Speaker 3>bad way. It's just because I saw so much talent.

0:44:44.400 --> 0:44:47.120
<v Speaker 3>He has incredible stuff. If you look at some of

0:44:47.160 --> 0:44:50.160
<v Speaker 3>these stuff plus models, like our friend Lance Brazowski put

0:44:50.200 --> 0:44:52.680
<v Speaker 3>out his top arms in this draft and it was

0:44:52.760 --> 0:44:55.840
<v Speaker 3>Jackson Flora one, and it was Liam Peterson two. And

0:44:55.880 --> 0:44:57.880
<v Speaker 3>a big reason why is he was noting you know,

0:44:58.120 --> 0:45:00.880
<v Speaker 3>all the different offerings that he has. You know, his

0:45:00.960 --> 0:45:03.400
<v Speaker 3>ability to spin the baseball. He's got a great fastball.

0:45:03.440 --> 0:45:06.040
<v Speaker 3>He just has really good stuff, but the command can

0:45:06.080 --> 0:45:08.360
<v Speaker 3>get a little bit out of whack right even control

0:45:08.400 --> 0:45:11.320
<v Speaker 3>within the zone, he's just simply not throwing strikes forget command.

0:45:11.600 --> 0:45:14.160
<v Speaker 3>Control goes out the window with him sometimes. And at

0:45:14.160 --> 0:45:16.680
<v Speaker 3>the University of Florida, they don't have the best pitching

0:45:16.680 --> 0:45:19.600
<v Speaker 3>development generally when looking at some of the top programs

0:45:19.840 --> 0:45:22.279
<v Speaker 3>in college baseball. So I just feel like it is

0:45:22.320 --> 0:45:27.080
<v Speaker 3>a guy who could be great and who just brought

0:45:27.120 --> 0:45:30.439
<v Speaker 3>him in the Cleveland Guardians, one of the best organizations

0:45:30.480 --> 0:45:33.600
<v Speaker 3>for pitching development. So I was actually curious where Peterson

0:45:33.680 --> 0:45:35.920
<v Speaker 3>was going to go in this draft because I thought, oh,

0:45:35.920 --> 0:45:38.560
<v Speaker 3>if he goes to a team that doesn't have great development,

0:45:39.239 --> 0:45:40.799
<v Speaker 3>I don't know how well it's going to work. But

0:45:40.840 --> 0:45:43.000
<v Speaker 3>once he landed with the Guardians, if everyone was watching

0:45:43.040 --> 0:45:45.560
<v Speaker 3>the draft stream, if you saw me smile, that was

0:45:45.600 --> 0:45:48.560
<v Speaker 3>my biggest smile from the whole draft, because I thought

0:45:48.600 --> 0:45:51.680
<v Speaker 3>that is perfect. Put him there and the Guardians are

0:45:51.719 --> 0:45:53.799
<v Speaker 3>going to make him a frontline guy, So I thought

0:45:53.840 --> 0:45:56.360
<v Speaker 3>that fit was perfect, perfect.

0:45:56.880 --> 0:45:58.840
<v Speaker 1>I like that one on a good shout from coach

0:45:58.880 --> 0:46:02.319
<v Speaker 1>TK get me a good correction on me Giants double

0:46:02.360 --> 0:46:04.279
<v Speaker 1>A is not in the Texas League. What am I

0:46:04.320 --> 0:46:08.640
<v Speaker 1>doing here? I'm supposed to know minor league ball.

0:46:06.480 --> 0:46:10.800
<v Speaker 3>I love our chat some of the smartest people and

0:46:10.920 --> 0:46:12.480
<v Speaker 3>especially in our discord too. And if you want to

0:46:12.520 --> 0:46:16.040
<v Speaker 3>continue to talk draft stuff, you know Derby All Star Weekend,

0:46:16.200 --> 0:46:18.279
<v Speaker 3>everything up until the deadline. It's a perfect time to

0:46:18.360 --> 0:46:20.120
<v Speaker 3>join our discord again, which you can find in the

0:46:20.160 --> 0:46:23.040
<v Speaker 3>episode description. But special shout out to our chat smartest

0:46:23.040 --> 0:46:25.759
<v Speaker 3>baseball people out there, no doubt about it. All Right,

0:46:25.800 --> 0:46:29.479
<v Speaker 3>So we still have most underrated pick, highest ceiling, highest floor,

0:46:29.560 --> 0:46:33.879
<v Speaker 3>quickest to MLB, and the biggest boom or bust prospect.

0:46:33.960 --> 0:46:36.600
<v Speaker 3>But podcast P I think it's a good time to

0:46:36.920 --> 0:46:40.360
<v Speaker 3>hear one last time from our friends at Hampton Farms Peanuts.

0:46:40.880 --> 0:46:45.640
<v Speaker 3>So let's talk about the most underrated pick in the

0:46:45.680 --> 0:46:51.080
<v Speaker 3>twenty twenty six MLB draft. I can go first, Let

0:46:51.080 --> 0:46:55.000
<v Speaker 3>me go first. Why not let me first? I went

0:46:55.160 --> 0:46:58.359
<v Speaker 3>with Cam Fluky to the Detroit Tigers, and they might

0:46:58.400 --> 0:47:01.360
<v Speaker 3>not seem underrated, but here's my take. I think he

0:47:01.440 --> 0:47:04.719
<v Speaker 3>ends up being the best pitcher from this draft. That's

0:47:04.760 --> 0:47:05.040
<v Speaker 3>the take.

0:47:05.160 --> 0:47:06.719
<v Speaker 1>Better than Flora.

0:47:06.800 --> 0:47:08.520
<v Speaker 3>I don't think he's better than Flora now.

0:47:08.760 --> 0:47:10.200
<v Speaker 1>No, like you think he's gonna be better than Flora.

0:47:10.239 --> 0:47:11.600
<v Speaker 3>I think he's going to be better than Flora. I

0:47:11.600 --> 0:47:13.239
<v Speaker 3>see a lot of Tyler glass Now in his game,

0:47:13.640 --> 0:47:17.680
<v Speaker 3>because first of all, I think he has potentially electric fastball.

0:47:17.920 --> 0:47:19.920
<v Speaker 3>But the problem is and the reason why he dropped

0:47:19.960 --> 0:47:22.600
<v Speaker 3>a little bit. I mean, this was starting pitcher one

0:47:22.800 --> 0:47:27.600
<v Speaker 3>going into the college baseball season, but unfortunately he got injured,

0:47:27.680 --> 0:47:31.520
<v Speaker 3>came back, was a little bit inconsistent, But we know pitchers,

0:47:31.680 --> 0:47:34.719
<v Speaker 3>these guys get hurt. But this guy just has stupid,

0:47:34.760 --> 0:47:37.120
<v Speaker 3>loud stuff. And you see that curveball that is very

0:47:37.160 --> 0:47:39.320
<v Speaker 3>similar to Glass now, which the one that just falls

0:47:39.320 --> 0:47:41.400
<v Speaker 3>off the table. But he also has this mid eighties

0:47:41.440 --> 0:47:44.279
<v Speaker 3>to high eighties slider that I've also seen work really well,

0:47:44.320 --> 0:47:46.080
<v Speaker 3>and he's even danced around with a change up a

0:47:46.080 --> 0:47:50.040
<v Speaker 3>little bit. I mean there's potentially four offerings high nineties heater,

0:47:50.480 --> 0:47:53.600
<v Speaker 3>and he's a big guy extension down the mound. Like

0:47:53.680 --> 0:47:59.120
<v Speaker 3>I think that the injury and post injury inconsistencies dropped

0:47:59.200 --> 0:48:01.680
<v Speaker 3>him down the board. But if he came out and

0:48:01.760 --> 0:48:05.000
<v Speaker 3>had the season that I think people were expecting before

0:48:05.080 --> 0:48:07.680
<v Speaker 3>the injury. This guy could have been taken number one,

0:48:08.160 --> 0:48:10.840
<v Speaker 3>not overall over Rock as the number one pitcher in

0:48:10.920 --> 0:48:14.160
<v Speaker 3>this draft. So the fact that he fell to twenty three,

0:48:14.640 --> 0:48:17.040
<v Speaker 3>and you look at the numbers two right, the numbers,

0:48:17.320 --> 0:48:21.000
<v Speaker 3>the surface level era numbers, they don't jump out at anyone.

0:48:21.040 --> 0:48:23.200
<v Speaker 3>I saw Tigers fans being like, Scott Harris took what

0:48:23.719 --> 0:48:26.960
<v Speaker 3>a guy with a mid four zra Like what? And

0:48:27.000 --> 0:48:31.120
<v Speaker 3>I'm thinking to myself, I think Scott Harris crushed this pick.

0:48:31.200 --> 0:48:33.160
<v Speaker 3>I love Cam Fluke. I think he will end up

0:48:33.200 --> 0:48:34.680
<v Speaker 3>being the best pitcher from this draft.

0:48:35.200 --> 0:48:40.239
<v Speaker 1>If Scott Harris deviated from prep, a prep hitter with

0:48:40.320 --> 0:48:43.160
<v Speaker 1>a college right handed arm, I think there's something he's

0:48:43.200 --> 0:48:46.120
<v Speaker 1>really liking here, and I would imagine that he probably

0:48:46.239 --> 0:48:49.000
<v Speaker 1>was their best player available at that point. I would

0:48:49.080 --> 0:48:51.680
<v Speaker 1>just that's pure conjecture, but just knowing how Harris has

0:48:51.719 --> 0:48:55.560
<v Speaker 1>typically approached the draft and just generally not being an

0:48:55.640 --> 0:49:00.120
<v Speaker 1>archetype that he goes after as as frequently, I do

0:49:00.120 --> 0:49:02.040
<v Speaker 1>you agree that this is probably somebody that they were

0:49:02.120 --> 0:49:04.280
<v Speaker 1>very excited to add. And I think the secondary command

0:49:04.360 --> 0:49:06.000
<v Speaker 1>is going to be an important thing to monitor. But

0:49:06.040 --> 0:49:09.360
<v Speaker 1>it's not that the secondaries aren't good. There. The gyro

0:49:09.480 --> 0:49:11.600
<v Speaker 1>slider looks like it can be a good bridge pitch,

0:49:11.640 --> 0:49:14.000
<v Speaker 1>and as you mentioned, like the curve ball is a banger.

0:49:14.480 --> 0:49:17.320
<v Speaker 1>The challenge is those bangers can be hard to land consistently,

0:49:17.360 --> 0:49:20.440
<v Speaker 1>so just finding he has some more consistency with that

0:49:20.480 --> 0:49:22.919
<v Speaker 1>will be big for Fluki. It's a long arm action,

0:49:23.080 --> 0:49:24.880
<v Speaker 1>so you know, it might just be the way he

0:49:24.920 --> 0:49:26.200
<v Speaker 1>throws and he can time it up, and he has

0:49:26.239 --> 0:49:28.400
<v Speaker 1>shown the ability to time it up pretty consistently in

0:49:28.440 --> 0:49:31.320
<v Speaker 1>the past, getting hurt I think really through a wrench

0:49:31.480 --> 0:49:33.640
<v Speaker 1>in his progress and of course in his draft stock.

0:49:33.719 --> 0:49:36.000
<v Speaker 1>But there's a guy that could absolutely be a monster,

0:49:36.120 --> 0:49:39.920
<v Speaker 1>And in terms of upside, it's hard to argue that

0:49:39.960 --> 0:49:42.520
<v Speaker 1>there's another one, maybe outside of Rojas, because you'reeting a

0:49:42.520 --> 0:49:45.719
<v Speaker 1>prep left to you throws fuel, but that has more upside.

0:49:46.040 --> 0:49:48.279
<v Speaker 1>The way, if you look at Flora and Rojas, the

0:49:48.280 --> 0:49:50.920
<v Speaker 1>next time that has the most upside is comfortably Fluky,

0:49:51.000 --> 0:49:53.240
<v Speaker 1>and I don't think there's anybody else that's close.

0:49:53.719 --> 0:49:56.800
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, So I love the pick Fluke did the Tigers,

0:49:56.800 --> 0:49:59.480
<v Speaker 3>and a reason why I called it underrated is, you know,

0:49:59.600 --> 0:50:02.640
<v Speaker 3>post everyone's giving their takes. I didn't hear one freaking

0:50:02.680 --> 0:50:05.600
<v Speaker 3>take about cam Fluki and then yeah, I'm looking at

0:50:05.600 --> 0:50:07.520
<v Speaker 3>Tigers fans and they don't like the pick. I'm like,

0:50:07.560 --> 0:50:08.080
<v Speaker 3>what the hell?

0:50:08.440 --> 0:50:09.200
<v Speaker 1>I loved the pick.

0:50:09.239 --> 0:50:11.000
<v Speaker 3>It was one of my favorite picks, So I thought

0:50:11.040 --> 0:50:13.240
<v Speaker 3>it's underrated for me for based on what I'm seeing.

0:50:13.239 --> 0:50:15.480
<v Speaker 3>Maybe some other Tigers fans are loving it. Maybe I

0:50:15.560 --> 0:50:17.799
<v Speaker 3>just didn't see some people also saying that they love it.

0:50:18.120 --> 0:50:21.600
<v Speaker 3>But yeah, rating fell for me. I totally hear that.

0:50:21.680 --> 0:50:24.080
<v Speaker 1>I didn't really see many opinions at all.

0:50:25.239 --> 0:50:26.840
<v Speaker 3>I love the pick, and that's.

0:50:26.680 --> 0:50:29.120
<v Speaker 1>The thing for me, going back to you know, the

0:50:29.120 --> 0:50:31.239
<v Speaker 1>player we already mentioned and Bogloran, so I don't want

0:50:31.239 --> 0:50:33.719
<v Speaker 1>to go too deep into it again. But maybe part

0:50:33.719 --> 0:50:35.160
<v Speaker 1>of it's because just no one wants to see the

0:50:35.160 --> 0:50:39.040
<v Speaker 1>Dodgers succeed, but you know, and maybe Dodgers fans in

0:50:39.080 --> 0:50:41.279
<v Speaker 1>particular probably very excited about this. But to be able

0:50:41.360 --> 0:50:44.560
<v Speaker 1>to get Lauren's at forty, I think is really exciting.

0:50:44.560 --> 0:50:46.680
<v Speaker 1>Not often do you get a high school bat with

0:50:46.840 --> 0:50:49.239
<v Speaker 1>the relatively higher for than most high school bats that

0:50:49.280 --> 0:50:52.480
<v Speaker 1>you see in the high ceiling. To put in that organization,

0:50:52.560 --> 0:50:55.200
<v Speaker 1>I think it's just so exciting. I thought he was

0:50:55.239 --> 0:50:57.160
<v Speaker 1>a top twenty, you know player in this class. I

0:50:57.160 --> 0:50:58.279
<v Speaker 1>thought he's a guy that could have went in the

0:50:58.320 --> 0:51:00.759
<v Speaker 1>middle of the first round. So the fact that the

0:51:00.800 --> 0:51:02.600
<v Speaker 1>Dodgers are able to get him there at forty when

0:51:02.719 --> 0:51:04.480
<v Speaker 1>you know they're not working we're talking about bonus pools,

0:51:04.480 --> 0:51:07.000
<v Speaker 1>they're not working with too much. They're they're very limited

0:51:07.000 --> 0:51:09.120
<v Speaker 1>because of you know, the restrictions that come with spending

0:51:09.120 --> 0:51:10.480
<v Speaker 1>as much money as they do. Like that was their

0:51:10.520 --> 0:51:12.640
<v Speaker 1>first selection. And with your first selection, when you got

0:51:12.760 --> 0:51:14.200
<v Speaker 1>to wait to pick forty and then by the way,

0:51:14.200 --> 0:51:16.000
<v Speaker 1>you're not going to pick again till pick one thirty two,

0:51:16.200 --> 0:51:17.680
<v Speaker 1>and then you're not gonna pick again to pick two

0:51:17.760 --> 0:51:20.279
<v Speaker 1>twenty three, you really are hoping that you're gonna get

0:51:20.280 --> 0:51:23.240
<v Speaker 1>somebody to land into your lap there. And and also

0:51:23.280 --> 0:51:24.839
<v Speaker 1>like they're gonna have to make the numbers work because

0:51:24.840 --> 0:51:26.520
<v Speaker 1>they don't have a big bonus pool and I don't

0:51:26.520 --> 0:51:29.160
<v Speaker 1>think Alron's is going to be signing for anything less

0:51:29.200 --> 0:51:31.719
<v Speaker 1>than at least the full slot value there. So I

0:51:31.719 --> 0:51:34.839
<v Speaker 1>think it's a it was an underrated selection that you know,

0:51:35.120 --> 0:51:37.400
<v Speaker 1>when you have a class like this, you might they

0:51:37.440 --> 0:51:39.359
<v Speaker 1>might be able to snipe a couple of players in

0:51:39.400 --> 0:51:41.960
<v Speaker 1>those later round because if they're the freaking Dodgers and

0:51:42.000 --> 0:51:43.359
<v Speaker 1>they have so many scouts and they do a good

0:51:43.400 --> 0:51:46.160
<v Speaker 1>job on that front. But I think with the draft

0:51:46.239 --> 0:51:49.120
<v Speaker 1>like this, like Laurns can can make or break it

0:51:49.160 --> 0:51:51.239
<v Speaker 1>in a lot of ways because they just again they

0:51:51.239 --> 0:51:53.759
<v Speaker 1>have one pick in the top one thirty, and so

0:51:53.840 --> 0:51:55.600
<v Speaker 1>the fact that it's a guy like Arons that fell

0:51:55.719 --> 0:51:58.160
<v Speaker 1>to them, I think is it's really underrated at how

0:51:58.239 --> 0:52:00.000
<v Speaker 1>much he can end up making this draft class.

0:52:00.600 --> 0:52:02.520
<v Speaker 3>Let's go to the highest ceiling. And my answer is

0:52:02.560 --> 0:52:04.200
<v Speaker 3>going to be quick because I think I've said this

0:52:04.239 --> 0:52:07.239
<v Speaker 3>one eighty thousand times. I think Von Lackey could be JT.

0:52:07.360 --> 0:52:10.120
<v Speaker 3>Real Muto with power, with more power. And we were

0:52:10.160 --> 0:52:12.360
<v Speaker 3>even talking about it on the couch last night and

0:52:13.280 --> 0:52:16.640
<v Speaker 3>Peyton goes, so you think von Lackey can be a

0:52:16.680 --> 0:52:18.359
<v Speaker 3>Hall of Famer And I go, I don't know about

0:52:18.360 --> 0:52:22.279
<v Speaker 3>hall of famer and he goes, JT. Real Muto with

0:52:22.320 --> 0:52:24.400
<v Speaker 3>more power as a hall of Famer, and then I

0:52:24.440 --> 0:52:26.160
<v Speaker 3>give him a little smile and I'm like, yeah, I

0:52:26.160 --> 0:52:28.160
<v Speaker 3>think he could be a Hall of Famer. I freaking

0:52:28.280 --> 0:52:31.239
<v Speaker 3>love Von Lackey. So Von Lackey again last year hit

0:52:31.280 --> 0:52:33.640
<v Speaker 3>three ninety seven with a twelve ninety one OPS at

0:52:33.640 --> 0:52:36.640
<v Speaker 3>the catcher position for the Minnesota Twins, and he was

0:52:36.680 --> 0:52:39.640
<v Speaker 3>a brick wall behind home plate. You knew when you

0:52:39.680 --> 0:52:42.720
<v Speaker 3>were facing Georgia Tech you were not stealing a base.

0:52:42.880 --> 0:52:46.920
<v Speaker 3>Why Von Lackey shuts down running games and he also

0:52:47.120 --> 0:52:50.879
<v Speaker 3>shuts down pass balls and wild pitches. Nothing gets by

0:52:50.920 --> 0:52:53.879
<v Speaker 3>this guy. Now, the framing, that's something that's the next

0:52:53.880 --> 0:52:56.000
<v Speaker 3>point that needs to develop. But over the last five

0:52:56.080 --> 0:52:58.960
<v Speaker 3>years watching college baseball, I would say he's the second

0:52:59.000 --> 0:53:03.719
<v Speaker 3>best defense and defender at the catching position behind Caden Bodined.

0:53:03.800 --> 0:53:06.480
<v Speaker 3>I think he's that level of a defender, and if

0:53:06.520 --> 0:53:09.960
<v Speaker 3>I think he improves receiving wise, this guy could go

0:53:10.000 --> 0:53:12.040
<v Speaker 3>win a Gold Glove. And then we get to the

0:53:12.120 --> 0:53:17.160
<v Speaker 3>offense where it's freakish, freakish baseball abilities, Like I love

0:53:17.239 --> 0:53:20.840
<v Speaker 3>the way that you were breaking it down where you

0:53:20.840 --> 0:53:22.839
<v Speaker 3>know what, instead of saying you broke it down, why

0:53:22.840 --> 0:53:23.560
<v Speaker 3>he's to break it down?

0:53:23.920 --> 0:53:26.040
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, I mean, he's just he's a guy that just

0:53:26.239 --> 0:53:28.520
<v Speaker 1>was a late bloomer in baseball in general, like under

0:53:28.560 --> 0:53:31.960
<v Speaker 1>recruited and really broke out two years ago and then

0:53:32.000 --> 0:53:33.640
<v Speaker 1>followed it up with the year that he had this year.

0:53:33.640 --> 0:53:35.480
<v Speaker 1>And I think the biggest thing is you just kind

0:53:35.480 --> 0:53:37.360
<v Speaker 1>of see an athlete going out there and just competing.

0:53:37.800 --> 0:53:39.880
<v Speaker 1>I don't think there's a ton of focus on mechanics,

0:53:40.000 --> 0:53:42.520
<v Speaker 1>and I think he's refined them a bunch for sure

0:53:42.800 --> 0:53:45.160
<v Speaker 1>as he's played more. But it's just a really good

0:53:45.200 --> 0:53:47.040
<v Speaker 1>athlete going out there and just doing his thing. And

0:53:47.080 --> 0:53:49.160
<v Speaker 1>I think guys he continues to refine the mechanics more

0:53:49.160 --> 0:53:51.160
<v Speaker 1>and more, it's only going to help him. But you

0:53:51.200 --> 0:53:53.480
<v Speaker 1>just see the athleticism in the box. It's a huge gather.

0:53:53.840 --> 0:53:55.680
<v Speaker 1>It gets to like his front foot's almost touching his

0:53:55.760 --> 0:53:58.239
<v Speaker 1>back foot, but he's still able to just control his

0:53:58.360 --> 0:54:02.280
<v Speaker 1>weight so well. He's able to hold backside and adjust,

0:54:02.440 --> 0:54:05.240
<v Speaker 1>and the feel for the barrel, I mean, it's just pretty.

0:54:05.600 --> 0:54:08.480
<v Speaker 1>It's just so impressive that a guy that again just

0:54:08.520 --> 0:54:09.719
<v Speaker 1>kind of looks like he's going up there and playing

0:54:09.719 --> 0:54:12.000
<v Speaker 1>wof fotball has the body control that he has. And

0:54:12.040 --> 0:54:13.719
<v Speaker 1>I do think there's gonna be some some little things

0:54:13.760 --> 0:54:16.439
<v Speaker 1>to simplifies he gets the pro ball, maybe the gather

0:54:16.480 --> 0:54:18.239
<v Speaker 1>doesn't need to be that pronounced. He can find the

0:54:18.280 --> 0:54:20.640
<v Speaker 1>back hip and coil a little bit more easily without

0:54:20.640 --> 0:54:22.960
<v Speaker 1>such a big move. Maybe the hands don't move as late,

0:54:23.080 --> 0:54:25.279
<v Speaker 1>but I think that's part of the intrigue with the

0:54:25.360 --> 0:54:27.080
<v Speaker 1>von Lackiez. He just kind of looks like he's going

0:54:27.080 --> 0:54:29.680
<v Speaker 1>out there and playing and making it look so good

0:54:29.760 --> 0:54:30.439
<v Speaker 1>despite that.

0:54:30.680 --> 0:54:34.959
<v Speaker 3>One hundred percent so I and again I say g Chrumuto,

0:54:35.480 --> 0:54:38.279
<v Speaker 3>not because because of the defense, but also because of

0:54:38.320 --> 0:54:42.120
<v Speaker 3>the sneaky speed right stole what fifteen sixteen bases last

0:54:42.160 --> 0:54:45.000
<v Speaker 3>year for Georgia Tech. Like he's a good runner, he's

0:54:45.040 --> 0:54:48.240
<v Speaker 3>got stupid juice. He has very similar batted ball metrics

0:54:48.480 --> 0:54:52.480
<v Speaker 3>to Rockchulowski, who also has stupid juice. And he also

0:54:52.840 --> 0:54:55.480
<v Speaker 3>has a high ceiling as well, and went number one overall,

0:54:55.560 --> 0:54:58.520
<v Speaker 3>getting the highest bonus for a number one pick in

0:54:58.600 --> 0:55:01.839
<v Speaker 3>the history of the draft. And they're very similar. And

0:55:02.040 --> 0:55:03.880
<v Speaker 3>I think that Von Lackey could end up being a

0:55:03.920 --> 0:55:07.719
<v Speaker 3>better catcher defensively than Rok Chulowski is a shortstop. And

0:55:07.719 --> 0:55:09.600
<v Speaker 3>that's not even saying that Rock Chilowski is a bad

0:55:09.600 --> 0:55:11.960
<v Speaker 3>defender at shortstop. That's not even saying he's average. I

0:55:12.000 --> 0:55:14.080
<v Speaker 3>think he's gonna be really good. I just think Von

0:55:14.160 --> 0:55:16.960
<v Speaker 3>Lackey could be a difference maker behind the plate and

0:55:17.000 --> 0:55:20.400
<v Speaker 3>then the makeup. I think it's Adie Graad makeup. Seriously,

0:55:20.520 --> 0:55:23.399
<v Speaker 3>He's like one of my favorite personalities I've ever seen,

0:55:23.680 --> 0:55:25.960
<v Speaker 3>Like the way his Georgia Tech teammates talk about him,

0:55:26.040 --> 0:55:28.360
<v Speaker 3>Drew Burris when they finally lost that last game and

0:55:28.360 --> 0:55:31.160
<v Speaker 3>he's speaking about Von Lackey and his postgame presser, and

0:55:31.239 --> 0:55:34.120
<v Speaker 3>before he could even talk about Lackey, he started choking

0:55:34.200 --> 0:55:37.000
<v Speaker 3>up about how much he meant to him, like and

0:55:37.080 --> 0:55:39.319
<v Speaker 3>Drew Burris is the leader, like he said, he's his

0:55:39.560 --> 0:55:43.399
<v Speaker 3>favorite player he's ever watched, Like Von Lackey, I think

0:55:43.600 --> 0:55:45.640
<v Speaker 3>is just I'm in love with the man. I'm in

0:55:45.640 --> 0:55:47.279
<v Speaker 3>love with him, and I'm not afraid to say it.

0:55:47.440 --> 0:55:50.359
<v Speaker 1>So now I do see I do see him as

0:55:50.440 --> 0:55:52.080
<v Speaker 1>kind of an orc shifter in the way that he

0:55:52.120 --> 0:55:55.040
<v Speaker 1>goes about his business and as a catcher and the

0:55:55.080 --> 0:55:57.960
<v Speaker 1>culture you know that just there's all these things that

0:55:58.000 --> 0:55:59.480
<v Speaker 1>I think you look at and you say, that's it's

0:55:59.480 --> 0:56:02.680
<v Speaker 1>really exciting to bring this guy into your organization. And uh,

0:56:03.280 --> 0:56:05.880
<v Speaker 1>just beyond that, even if he doesn't reach his ceiling offensively,

0:56:05.960 --> 0:56:08.080
<v Speaker 1>with the defensive prowess he has, with the ability to

0:56:08.840 --> 0:56:12.200
<v Speaker 1>just carry himself at a high level and I think

0:56:12.239 --> 0:56:14.239
<v Speaker 1>he's going to grow into a really good just just

0:56:14.600 --> 0:56:17.480
<v Speaker 1>pitch caller, just game manager, however you want to call it.

0:56:17.520 --> 0:56:19.040
<v Speaker 1>He just seems like he checks all the boxes that

0:56:19.080 --> 0:56:19.960
<v Speaker 1>you want out of a catcher.

0:56:20.360 --> 0:56:22.600
<v Speaker 3>What about you, who has the highest ceiling?

0:56:23.600 --> 0:56:26.480
<v Speaker 1>I gotta go with with Eric Booth Junior. I think

0:56:26.480 --> 0:56:29.000
<v Speaker 1>when you have a player like this, where you have

0:56:29.000 --> 0:56:31.719
<v Speaker 1>an elite runner with plus defense in center field and

0:56:32.000 --> 0:56:34.719
<v Speaker 1>he's flashed comfortably above average power as well from the

0:56:34.760 --> 0:56:37.440
<v Speaker 1>left side, I mean, I think this has got to

0:56:37.520 --> 0:56:40.120
<v Speaker 1>be the highest ceiling if everything comes together the swing

0:56:40.160 --> 0:56:42.680
<v Speaker 1>mechanics and use some refining. I think there's you can

0:56:42.719 --> 0:56:43.960
<v Speaker 1>see in the video like there's a little bit of

0:56:43.960 --> 0:56:46.239
<v Speaker 1>a hitch in the swing. But even with that, his

0:56:46.280 --> 0:56:48.080
<v Speaker 1>bats of ball has been as good as any prepster

0:56:48.200 --> 0:56:49.800
<v Speaker 1>in the class. And I think it's only going to

0:56:49.880 --> 0:56:52.080
<v Speaker 1>improve as that kind of hitch as he brings his

0:56:52.160 --> 0:56:54.200
<v Speaker 1>hands down lad and and a little bit of a

0:56:54.239 --> 0:56:58.120
<v Speaker 1>flat path gets smoothed out. You've seen rags of losses

0:56:58.160 --> 0:57:00.800
<v Speaker 1>that are comfortably above average. He's physical. His dad played

0:57:00.800 --> 0:57:03.239
<v Speaker 1>football and I think was a record breaking like kick

0:57:03.280 --> 0:57:07.640
<v Speaker 1>returner in college. You can see the explosiveness. You can

0:57:07.680 --> 0:57:11.440
<v Speaker 1>see the twitch and you pair of that with impact defensively,

0:57:11.840 --> 0:57:14.160
<v Speaker 1>the ability to impact the baseball, a good feel for

0:57:14.200 --> 0:57:15.799
<v Speaker 1>the barrel, and it's like, this guy could be a

0:57:15.800 --> 0:57:18.040
<v Speaker 1>five tool star if it all comes together.

0:57:18.480 --> 0:57:21.560
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, I love the pick. And I remember I was

0:57:21.640 --> 0:57:24.600
<v Speaker 3>running some of my pro comps by Tyler and I

0:57:24.680 --> 0:57:26.880
<v Speaker 3>was like, is it crazy to say he's kind of

0:57:26.880 --> 0:57:29.880
<v Speaker 3>like Corbin Carroll? And Tyler goes, no, not really, right

0:57:29.920 --> 0:57:32.880
<v Speaker 3>if he achieves that ceiling that we're talking about with

0:57:32.920 --> 0:57:35.680
<v Speaker 3>the explosion at the plate, the ton of speed on

0:57:35.720 --> 0:57:38.640
<v Speaker 3>the base is the ability to defend the position, But

0:57:38.680 --> 0:57:40.840
<v Speaker 3>we're talking about ceiling, and now we're going to talk

0:57:40.840 --> 0:57:46.200
<v Speaker 3>about floor, like who has the highest floor? Mine is simple.

0:57:47.520 --> 0:57:49.840
<v Speaker 3>I would be shocked if Rock Schwlowski isn't at least

0:57:49.840 --> 0:57:52.720
<v Speaker 3>a pretty good big leaguer, Like, you know, I think

0:57:52.920 --> 0:57:55.160
<v Speaker 3>you talked about some of the slight concerns that you

0:57:55.240 --> 0:57:57.280
<v Speaker 3>have with his swing a little bit. That hitch that

0:57:57.360 --> 0:58:02.520
<v Speaker 3>he has, isn't that his only issue? I think defensively,

0:58:02.520 --> 0:58:04.680
<v Speaker 3>he's going to feel this position. He's got a good arm,

0:58:04.720 --> 0:58:07.560
<v Speaker 3>He's always had a ton of power at every stop

0:58:07.600 --> 0:58:10.320
<v Speaker 3>he's gone through, Like he's been one of the best

0:58:10.360 --> 0:58:13.440
<v Speaker 3>players in college baseball now for a while, in you know,

0:58:13.560 --> 0:58:17.120
<v Speaker 3>only a few short years, he's just done everything that's

0:58:17.160 --> 0:58:20.800
<v Speaker 3>been asked of him and put up stupid numbers at

0:58:20.880 --> 0:58:23.840
<v Speaker 3>every stop. Like this is the guy. He's the number

0:58:23.840 --> 0:58:27.520
<v Speaker 3>one overall pick. I think I'm not saying his floor

0:58:27.680 --> 0:58:33.160
<v Speaker 3>is Dansby. It's not, because again you never know with

0:58:33.240 --> 0:58:35.919
<v Speaker 3>number one overall picks, we never know. But I feel

0:58:35.960 --> 0:58:38.720
<v Speaker 3>like his thirtieth percentile outcomes dance Py Swants and who

0:58:38.800 --> 0:58:41.080
<v Speaker 3>signed a one hundred and seventy five million dollar contract.

0:58:41.840 --> 0:58:43.680
<v Speaker 3>And I'm not saying I think Von Lucky is a

0:58:43.720 --> 0:58:46.680
<v Speaker 3>higher ceiling. I think Grady Emerson potentially is a higher ceiling.

0:58:47.040 --> 0:58:50.360
<v Speaker 3>But if we're talking about floor, he is a big leaguer,

0:58:50.640 --> 0:58:52.080
<v Speaker 3>I mean, and I think he's a good one.

0:58:52.560 --> 0:58:55.680
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, when you defend the position like that, and then

0:58:55.920 --> 0:58:59.000
<v Speaker 1>you look at what he's been able to do just

0:58:59.120 --> 0:59:01.320
<v Speaker 1>offensively in his track record. Right, this is a guy

0:59:01.400 --> 0:59:06.640
<v Speaker 1>that was a top two ish round pick prospect out

0:59:06.640 --> 0:59:09.440
<v Speaker 1>of high school and then he goes to UCLA and

0:59:09.600 --> 0:59:11.840
<v Speaker 1>just puts up in a thousand ops in three years,

0:59:12.360 --> 0:59:15.160
<v Speaker 1>you know, well, above average contact right stand out, EV's

0:59:15.160 --> 0:59:17.440
<v Speaker 1>a good feel for the strike zone, like he has

0:59:17.520 --> 0:59:19.400
<v Speaker 1>the pedigree, and he's been one of the more you know,

0:59:19.560 --> 0:59:24.280
<v Speaker 1>I think I would say well followed prospects in a

0:59:24.320 --> 0:59:27.320
<v Speaker 1>while that you look at and you just say, you

0:59:27.480 --> 0:59:29.840
<v Speaker 1>keep putting up these these these high bars for him,

0:59:29.840 --> 0:59:31.560
<v Speaker 1>and he just keeps meeting them. And that's always going

0:59:31.600 --> 0:59:34.000
<v Speaker 1>to happen anytime a guy's a legit draft prospecting him

0:59:34.000 --> 0:59:35.960
<v Speaker 1>aout Dylan Cruz, right, and like Dylan Cruise is kind

0:59:35.960 --> 0:59:38.480
<v Speaker 1>of a guy that's not reaching his median outcome right now,

0:59:38.680 --> 0:59:40.480
<v Speaker 1>and even then, I think what we're seeing this year

0:59:40.840 --> 0:59:42.959
<v Speaker 1>is like, even if he's in his twentyeth thirtieth percent

0:59:43.080 --> 0:59:45.080
<v Speaker 1>our outcome, he's still going to be a big ligger

0:59:45.080 --> 0:59:48.880
<v Speaker 1>for a little while. I for a while with Rock Chulawski,

0:59:48.920 --> 0:59:51.200
<v Speaker 1>he's just you have the track record that he has

0:59:51.240 --> 0:59:53.920
<v Speaker 1>as a top high school guy going to college, having

0:59:53.960 --> 0:59:56.640
<v Speaker 1>the success that he's had. And my one gripe, I

0:59:56.640 --> 0:59:59.480
<v Speaker 1>guess right, the little nitpick that you can have with

0:59:59.640 --> 1:00:03.000
<v Speaker 1>him is some of the little swing mechanic aspects, and

1:00:03.120 --> 1:00:05.440
<v Speaker 1>I think it could cause you know, how late the

1:00:05.520 --> 1:00:08.040
<v Speaker 1>hands have to come back up and where the barrel tips.

1:00:08.240 --> 1:00:10.200
<v Speaker 1>He could cause a little bit of challenges maybe on

1:00:10.240 --> 1:00:12.360
<v Speaker 1>stuff in I don't love like how he gets so

1:00:12.640 --> 1:00:15.040
<v Speaker 1>deep into his base two strikes, But even with all

1:00:15.080 --> 1:00:17.320
<v Speaker 1>of that, he put up some of the better, you know,

1:00:17.480 --> 1:00:19.880
<v Speaker 1>contact traits of these top bats in the class. He

1:00:20.000 --> 1:00:22.840
<v Speaker 1>put up ridiculous eggs, velosities. We saw him consistently slug,

1:00:23.160 --> 1:00:25.640
<v Speaker 1>and I mean he has the ability to manipulate his

1:00:25.800 --> 1:00:27.720
<v Speaker 1>swing in his path to you know.

1:00:28.160 --> 1:00:28.840
<v Speaker 3>Make it work.

1:00:29.040 --> 1:00:31.160
<v Speaker 1>Like there's times where he's getting crowded inside and he

1:00:31.200 --> 1:00:32.600
<v Speaker 1>can just pull his hands in and almost put a

1:00:32.600 --> 1:00:34.760
<v Speaker 1>half swing and punch a ball still over the wall

1:00:34.800 --> 1:00:37.080
<v Speaker 1>and left field. There's times where pitches are breaking away

1:00:37.080 --> 1:00:38.400
<v Speaker 1>and he's a little bit late and he can still

1:00:38.480 --> 1:00:40.600
<v Speaker 1>just shoot it the other way. And then when he

1:00:40.680 --> 1:00:43.760
<v Speaker 1>gets his A plus swing off like it is incredibly impressive.

1:00:43.840 --> 1:00:46.200
<v Speaker 1>So the ability to just just kind of maneuver and

1:00:46.280 --> 1:00:48.120
<v Speaker 1>manipulate with his swing tells me that I think he

1:00:48.200 --> 1:00:51.760
<v Speaker 1>can make those little refinements to smooth things out and

1:00:51.840 --> 1:00:54.919
<v Speaker 1>make it translate more quickly to upper level baseball, because

1:00:54.920 --> 1:00:56.840
<v Speaker 1>you know he's going to be challenged quite quickly. And

1:00:56.880 --> 1:00:59.040
<v Speaker 1>then when you are a defender like he is a shortstop,

1:00:59.600 --> 1:01:01.720
<v Speaker 1>you have a good chance to you know, I think

1:01:01.840 --> 1:01:04.920
<v Speaker 1>kind of reach that danceby Swanson outcome, which would be

1:01:04.920 --> 1:01:07.840
<v Speaker 1>a really good player. Like I think that's a really solid, solid,

1:01:07.960 --> 1:01:10.880
<v Speaker 1>solid outcome. Of course you're dreaming on, you know, a

1:01:11.000 --> 1:01:12.920
<v Speaker 1>perennial All Star when you take a guy at this

1:01:13.080 --> 1:01:15.320
<v Speaker 1>one one. But I also think you got a really

1:01:15.320 --> 1:01:17.480
<v Speaker 1>good chance at just having a multi win shortsot for

1:01:17.520 --> 1:01:18.880
<v Speaker 1>a long time. There you go.

1:01:19.040 --> 1:01:20.640
<v Speaker 3>Who's your highest floor is?

1:01:20.720 --> 1:01:20.760
<v Speaker 2>That?

1:01:20.960 --> 1:01:21.320
<v Speaker 3>Is it rock?

1:01:21.760 --> 1:01:22.960
<v Speaker 1>That's mine? There you go.

1:01:23.840 --> 1:01:25.960
<v Speaker 3>So we still have two more. We have Quickest to

1:01:26.000 --> 1:01:29.120
<v Speaker 3>the big leagues and the biggest boom er Bus prospect.

1:01:29.800 --> 1:01:32.120
<v Speaker 3>Talk about what's going on with our friends at Lydd's.

1:01:33.000 --> 1:01:35.040
<v Speaker 1>Got a pretty cool event coming up, Yes, we do,

1:01:35.360 --> 1:01:38.120
<v Speaker 1>hanging out with Ryan Howard. If you're here in Philly,

1:01:38.560 --> 1:01:41.760
<v Speaker 1>come on and check it out Monday July thirteenth at

1:01:41.920 --> 1:01:46.280
<v Speaker 1>ten am at the Lydds Fashion Hall District or the

1:01:46.320 --> 1:01:49.640
<v Speaker 1>district mall excuse me, Lydd's Fashion District Mall excuse me.

1:01:49.720 --> 1:01:52.560
<v Speaker 1>There's a lot of buzzwords in there. But excited. Monday

1:01:52.640 --> 1:01:54.720
<v Speaker 1>July thirteenth at ten am you can meet Ryan Howard.

1:01:54.880 --> 1:01:57.400
<v Speaker 1>I believe we'll be able to get some signatures, get

1:01:57.440 --> 1:01:59.040
<v Speaker 1>a picture with him, one of the two. It'll be

1:01:59.120 --> 1:02:00.960
<v Speaker 1>pretty fun. But I'm very much looking forward to that

1:02:00.960 --> 1:02:02.840
<v Speaker 1>We're gonna film some content with him. I mean, this

1:02:03.000 --> 1:02:06.000
<v Speaker 1>is a guy that tormented my Marlins when I was

1:02:06.040 --> 1:02:09.040
<v Speaker 1>growing up watching him him launch fifty homers. I think

1:02:09.120 --> 1:02:11.000
<v Speaker 1>this is one of the guys that just kind of

1:02:11.320 --> 1:02:13.080
<v Speaker 1>channels to the childhood there. So if you're out here

1:02:13.120 --> 1:02:15.600
<v Speaker 1>in Philly, come meet Ryan Howard, come hang out with

1:02:15.720 --> 1:02:19.480
<v Speaker 1>us July thirteenth, ten am at the Lydds Fashion District Mall.

1:02:19.840 --> 1:02:21.520
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, it's gonna be a ton of fun guys again

1:02:21.640 --> 1:02:26.320
<v Speaker 3>Lydd's Fashion District Mall in Philly, ten am on Monday.

1:02:26.960 --> 1:02:31.640
<v Speaker 3>All right, quickest to MLB Mine again will be somewhat quick.

1:02:32.800 --> 1:02:37.400
<v Speaker 3>The Blue Jays drafted Cole Carlin out of Arizona State

1:02:38.080 --> 1:02:40.640
<v Speaker 3>in the first round, and I was looking at some

1:02:40.840 --> 1:02:46.920
<v Speaker 3>quotes afterwards and they said that he has two October pitches.

1:02:48.320 --> 1:02:51.040
<v Speaker 3>Now what does that mean? Well, Cole Carlin's a bitcher

1:02:51.080 --> 1:02:55.080
<v Speaker 3>out of Arizona State. Heater like you wouldn't believe. I mean,

1:02:55.160 --> 1:02:57.320
<v Speaker 3>this can he he can from the left side. He

1:02:57.360 --> 1:02:59.840
<v Speaker 3>could rattle it up to triple digits. He's touching in

1:03:00.160 --> 1:03:03.480
<v Speaker 3>high nineties right. It is a big time heater and

1:03:03.560 --> 1:03:06.040
<v Speaker 3>he's got an excellent slider as well. I mean podcast

1:03:06.080 --> 1:03:07.840
<v Speaker 3>p is putting it on the screen. That's him hitting

1:03:07.960 --> 1:03:10.920
<v Speaker 3>one oh one. You know when he's got this dirty

1:03:11.040 --> 1:03:14.040
<v Speaker 3>slider again high eighties, is even touched in the low nineties,

1:03:14.360 --> 1:03:16.720
<v Speaker 3>And I agree with him. And I was thinking to myself,

1:03:17.000 --> 1:03:20.520
<v Speaker 3>why did they say two pitches for October? And I

1:03:20.640 --> 1:03:23.480
<v Speaker 3>do remember that the Royals brought up their draft pick

1:03:23.720 --> 1:03:26.280
<v Speaker 3>as a pitcher, another left who ended up pitching for

1:03:26.440 --> 1:03:28.680
<v Speaker 3>them in the playoffs. Now, I'm not saying the Blue

1:03:28.760 --> 1:03:30.920
<v Speaker 3>Jays are going to make the playoffs, but what I

1:03:31.000 --> 1:03:34.080
<v Speaker 3>am saying is it is wide open and the Blue

1:03:34.160 --> 1:03:37.480
<v Speaker 3>Jays could also use a left handed reliever. So I

1:03:37.560 --> 1:03:41.080
<v Speaker 3>would not be surprised if Cole Carlin is called up

1:03:41.320 --> 1:03:43.920
<v Speaker 3>this season if the Blue Jays need him late, just

1:03:44.000 --> 1:03:48.600
<v Speaker 3>because he has those two pitches. Right now, I'm just saying,

1:03:49.200 --> 1:03:51.439
<v Speaker 3>in terms of quickest to the big leagues, I'm calling

1:03:51.520 --> 1:03:53.880
<v Speaker 3>my shot on that one. He pitches for the Blue

1:03:53.960 --> 1:03:56.760
<v Speaker 3>Jays this season. This season, I hope the.

1:03:56.760 --> 1:03:59.800
<v Speaker 1>Blue Jays can can kind of nestle their way back

1:03:59.840 --> 1:04:03.280
<v Speaker 1>in the hunt to make that possible too. So who's

1:04:03.320 --> 1:04:06.040
<v Speaker 1>your pick for fastest of the big leagues? Quickest of

1:04:06.080 --> 1:04:08.120
<v Speaker 1>the big leagues. Yes, yeah, I still got to go

1:04:08.280 --> 1:04:11.360
<v Speaker 1>Rock Scholowski. Yeah, I know it's a boring pick. Again,

1:04:11.720 --> 1:04:15.320
<v Speaker 1>I just I I look at his skill set, I

1:04:15.400 --> 1:04:16.880
<v Speaker 1>look at what the way that you're gonna have to

1:04:16.960 --> 1:04:18.640
<v Speaker 1>challenge this guy pretty quickly. I know people have made

1:04:18.640 --> 1:04:20.720
<v Speaker 1>the comments, go oh, I didn't hit that well against

1:04:20.720 --> 1:04:25.720
<v Speaker 1>Friday starters. Whatever, I promise you like, he's gonna be fine.

1:04:26.280 --> 1:04:29.480
<v Speaker 1>And I really do think like the White Sox hitting

1:04:29.520 --> 1:04:32.200
<v Speaker 1>infrastructure has changed a lot, and I do think that

1:04:32.280 --> 1:04:34.640
<v Speaker 1>this is a situation where if there are some slight

1:04:34.720 --> 1:04:37.160
<v Speaker 1>adjustments to make, like, the White Sucks are finally in

1:04:37.160 --> 1:04:38.480
<v Speaker 1>a position where I think they can do that. And

1:04:38.520 --> 1:04:40.640
<v Speaker 1>I think that starts at the top of Showman Derek S.

1:04:40.640 --> 1:04:42.840
<v Speaker 1>Sherman and what he's done, but all the way down,

1:04:43.120 --> 1:04:45.120
<v Speaker 1>I do think the White Sox have the infrastructure now

1:04:45.200 --> 1:04:47.840
<v Speaker 1>to just kind of help a Rock Scholowski make those

1:04:48.080 --> 1:04:50.440
<v Speaker 1>minor tweaks. The gloves there already so you don't have

1:04:50.480 --> 1:04:51.840
<v Speaker 1>to really worry about that. And the thing is, like

1:04:52.440 --> 1:04:54.800
<v Speaker 1>with Rock, I think those final little stretch, like the

1:04:55.560 --> 1:04:59.120
<v Speaker 1>final couple pieces to putting it all together offensively can

1:04:59.200 --> 1:05:01.080
<v Speaker 1>happen at the Big League because there's so many different

1:05:01.080 --> 1:05:02.600
<v Speaker 1>ways that he can impact the game. And this is

1:05:02.640 --> 1:05:04.640
<v Speaker 1>an offense that bangs, like you don't need Rock to

1:05:04.640 --> 1:05:06.200
<v Speaker 1>get up there and be a lead off hitter right away.

1:05:06.640 --> 1:05:09.120
<v Speaker 1>Now you can get up there and hit the bottom

1:05:09.120 --> 1:05:11.320
<v Speaker 1>of the order, defend, and eventually he's gonna be a

1:05:11.360 --> 1:05:12.919
<v Speaker 1>guy that's in the heart of your order. That's the goal.

1:05:13.280 --> 1:05:15.120
<v Speaker 1>But for a White Sox team that you know wants

1:05:15.160 --> 1:05:18.240
<v Speaker 1>to be competitive and I think can be, it is

1:05:18.360 --> 1:05:20.600
<v Speaker 1>right now obviously and can be throughout next year as well. Like,

1:05:20.680 --> 1:05:21.959
<v Speaker 1>that's gonna be a guy that I think they would

1:05:22.080 --> 1:05:24.960
<v Speaker 1>they would love to have involved there. So look, I

1:05:25.040 --> 1:05:27.400
<v Speaker 1>mean there's there's some things front office wise, I'm not

1:05:27.560 --> 1:05:29.880
<v Speaker 1>totally bought into Chris Getz and all of that, But

1:05:29.960 --> 1:05:32.640
<v Speaker 1>I like Showman. I like what they've done on the

1:05:32.760 --> 1:05:35.600
<v Speaker 1>hitting side, and I think Julawski is gonna benefit from

1:05:35.600 --> 1:05:36.760
<v Speaker 1>that because of how close he's going to be to

1:05:36.760 --> 1:05:38.120
<v Speaker 1>the big leagues immediately, and I think they're going to

1:05:38.120 --> 1:05:39.600
<v Speaker 1>want to get him more and kind of directly with

1:05:39.680 --> 1:05:43.200
<v Speaker 1>the Showman more quickly. How he fits in will be interesting.

1:05:43.480 --> 1:05:45.280
<v Speaker 1>I think, you know, there's gonna be some some things

1:05:45.320 --> 1:05:47.120
<v Speaker 1>that have to move around, but obviously you make things

1:05:47.160 --> 1:05:49.800
<v Speaker 1>happen for him, and I think we see him right

1:05:49.840 --> 1:05:51.400
<v Speaker 1>at the start of next year. I think there's a

1:05:51.440 --> 1:05:53.760
<v Speaker 1>really good chance that we could see him early next season.

1:05:54.280 --> 1:05:57.640
<v Speaker 3>Wow, let's go to our biggest boom or bust prospect,

1:05:58.240 --> 1:06:00.920
<v Speaker 3>and you already kind of talked about Eric book Junior,

1:06:01.200 --> 1:06:03.720
<v Speaker 3>who got drafted to the Orioles, and I still do

1:06:03.880 --> 1:06:06.960
<v Speaker 3>think there's some potential bust to his profile. I lean

1:06:07.040 --> 1:06:09.360
<v Speaker 3>more towards boom. I really like him as a prospect,

1:06:09.760 --> 1:06:13.040
<v Speaker 3>but I think Jacob Lombard dropping to the Marlins was

1:06:13.120 --> 1:06:15.840
<v Speaker 3>kind of indicative of that profile where it is big

1:06:15.920 --> 1:06:18.960
<v Speaker 3>time boom or bust. And even Tyler brought him up

1:06:19.120 --> 1:06:22.840
<v Speaker 3>on the draft stream where you know, he kind of

1:06:22.880 --> 1:06:25.040
<v Speaker 3>compared him to Elijah Green, the draft pick by the

1:06:25.160 --> 1:06:27.360
<v Speaker 3>Nationals a few years ago. It was currently kind of

1:06:27.360 --> 1:06:31.920
<v Speaker 3>struggling in Higa, where it's this guy with major, major tools.

1:06:32.440 --> 1:06:35.800
<v Speaker 3>I mean, Lombard is a fantastic defender, He's got a

1:06:35.920 --> 1:06:38.480
<v Speaker 3>ton of juice at the plate. He's even a solid

1:06:38.560 --> 1:06:41.880
<v Speaker 3>runner as well, but the hit tool concern right, and

1:06:41.960 --> 1:06:43.800
<v Speaker 3>I think that's what a lot of teams were looking

1:06:43.840 --> 1:06:46.400
<v Speaker 3>at where he was potentially mocked at number four to

1:06:46.480 --> 1:06:48.880
<v Speaker 3>the Giants. He was mocked at number five, he was

1:06:48.960 --> 1:06:51.720
<v Speaker 3>mocked at number six, and I think it was somewhat

1:06:51.800 --> 1:06:54.920
<v Speaker 3>surprising to see him fall down to fourteen, But then

1:06:55.000 --> 1:06:58.960
<v Speaker 3>with a guy of his talent magnitude, getting him at

1:06:59.080 --> 1:07:03.040
<v Speaker 3>fourteen is definitely worth the try. Like generally, I love

1:07:03.120 --> 1:07:04.800
<v Speaker 3>the pick for the Marlins. I actually think it was

1:07:04.840 --> 1:07:08.560
<v Speaker 3>one of the better value picks. But this is the guy.

1:07:08.560 --> 1:07:10.720
<v Speaker 3>If he figures it out offensively with the hit tool,

1:07:11.640 --> 1:07:13.600
<v Speaker 3>I mean you're looking at a potential five tool player,

1:07:14.000 --> 1:07:16.880
<v Speaker 3>and if he doesn't, you can be looking at Elijah Green. Yeah,

1:07:17.000 --> 1:07:18.640
<v Speaker 3>not why I think he's the biggest boom er Bus

1:07:18.760 --> 1:07:19.680
<v Speaker 3>prospect in this draft.

1:07:20.040 --> 1:07:22.360
<v Speaker 1>I think it's a great shout because I think he's

1:07:22.400 --> 1:07:25.160
<v Speaker 1>as tooled up as is just about anybody. And that's

1:07:25.200 --> 1:07:28.120
<v Speaker 1>the exciting part. The power speed combination that you could

1:07:28.160 --> 1:07:30.320
<v Speaker 1>get from Lombard is nuts. But yeah, the biggest concern

1:07:30.440 --> 1:07:33.000
<v Speaker 1>is hit tool and that's where you can you look

1:07:33.000 --> 1:07:35.680
<v Speaker 1>at like a Connor Griffin. And the biggest concern with

1:07:35.760 --> 1:07:38.520
<v Speaker 1>Connor Griffin was hit tool. Nobody had any questions about

1:07:38.760 --> 1:07:41.520
<v Speaker 1>the tools otherwise, and obviously Connor Griffin's on a little

1:07:41.520 --> 1:07:43.640
<v Speaker 1>bit of a different level. But you know, at the

1:07:43.720 --> 1:07:46.280
<v Speaker 1>time there was some concerns about the hit tool, and

1:07:46.320 --> 1:07:49.440
<v Speaker 1>that's why he slid a little bit. And you look

1:07:49.480 --> 1:07:52.200
<v Speaker 1>at Lombard, that is the one question. No one is

1:07:52.320 --> 1:07:55.680
<v Speaker 1>questioning the raw ability in the up side there. So, yeah,

1:07:55.720 --> 1:07:57.720
<v Speaker 1>there's a world where he could be an all star

1:07:57.880 --> 1:07:59.920
<v Speaker 1>level player, and there's a world where he could stop

1:08:00.080 --> 1:08:01.600
<v Speaker 1>out in the minor leagues. And you can say that

1:08:01.640 --> 1:08:03.720
<v Speaker 1>about just about anybody in the first round. But I

1:08:03.760 --> 1:08:05.360
<v Speaker 1>don't think to this degree, and I'm with you, I

1:08:05.440 --> 1:08:07.760
<v Speaker 1>think this is this is one of the wider ranges

1:08:07.800 --> 1:08:09.840
<v Speaker 1>of outcomes that you have in the draft. But that's

1:08:09.840 --> 1:08:14.240
<v Speaker 1>also why you make that pick at six or five,

1:08:14.320 --> 1:08:16.479
<v Speaker 1>which was still a very big possibility. You're okay with it,

1:08:16.560 --> 1:08:18.400
<v Speaker 1>but you're you're a little on edge. You're like, oh,

1:08:18.880 --> 1:08:21.519
<v Speaker 1>this is a wide delta here. But when you have

1:08:21.600 --> 1:08:23.400
<v Speaker 1>a player like this fall to you, you know, like

1:08:23.439 --> 1:08:26.000
<v Speaker 1>where the Marlins were able to get him at fourteen,

1:08:26.439 --> 1:08:28.200
<v Speaker 1>now you're more than willing to take that risk right

1:08:28.240 --> 1:08:30.479
<v Speaker 1>middle of the first round. That upside You don't often

1:08:30.479 --> 1:08:32.320
<v Speaker 1>get players are that kind of upside at fourteen, You're

1:08:32.360 --> 1:08:34.280
<v Speaker 1>gonna roll that dice. But it just seemed like the

1:08:34.320 --> 1:08:37.880
<v Speaker 1>teams you know ahead of that weren't quite willing to

1:08:38.040 --> 1:08:41.000
<v Speaker 1>risk the downside for the upside exactly.

1:08:41.040 --> 1:08:42.519
<v Speaker 3>And I assume he was your pick as well, or

1:08:42.560 --> 1:08:44.000
<v Speaker 3>did you have a different boomer Bus guy.

1:08:44.479 --> 1:08:45.719
<v Speaker 1>I gotta go Justin Lebron.

1:08:46.080 --> 1:08:47.439
<v Speaker 3>Okay, yeah, that's a good one too, Guys.

1:08:47.760 --> 1:08:51.519
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, this because Justin Lebron is a boomer Bus player

1:08:51.680 --> 1:08:57.080
<v Speaker 1>on both sides of the game, offensively and defensively. Offensively

1:08:57.439 --> 1:09:01.160
<v Speaker 1>like he has the tools to be a really productive hitter.

1:09:01.600 --> 1:09:05.200
<v Speaker 1>This guy entered the season as a potential one to

1:09:05.280 --> 1:09:09.080
<v Speaker 1>one candidate and finished the regular season and entered the

1:09:09.120 --> 1:09:11.439
<v Speaker 1>draft as one of the most polarizing players in the class.

1:09:12.120 --> 1:09:15.080
<v Speaker 1>So we still saw him land to the to the

1:09:15.160 --> 1:09:17.960
<v Speaker 1>Reds and in the middle of the first round roughly.

1:09:18.600 --> 1:09:21.840
<v Speaker 1>But I had no idea where this guy was gonna land.

1:09:21.880 --> 1:09:24.679
<v Speaker 1>And when I threw fewers out to people, you would

1:09:24.680 --> 1:09:27.200
<v Speaker 1>get answers all over the map. And I can't remember

1:09:27.680 --> 1:09:30.880
<v Speaker 1>a player like this polarizing in a little bit. And

1:09:30.960 --> 1:09:32.800
<v Speaker 1>the big part of that is because, I mean, you

1:09:32.840 --> 1:09:36.000
<v Speaker 1>saw what he did in his sophomore year, and he

1:09:36.120 --> 1:09:37.960
<v Speaker 1>saw the flashes, and you think, oh, if your builds

1:09:37.960 --> 1:09:39.720
<v Speaker 1>on that, My gosh, this guy could could easily be,

1:09:39.960 --> 1:09:41.360
<v Speaker 1>you know, one of the top players in the in

1:09:41.439 --> 1:09:46.280
<v Speaker 1>the class overall. But with the flashes of excitement. Offensively

1:09:46.360 --> 1:09:48.519
<v Speaker 1>in the twitch and the bat speed, you saw forty

1:09:48.600 --> 1:09:51.840
<v Speaker 1>percent whift rate this season on breaking balls, you saw

1:09:52.000 --> 1:09:57.120
<v Speaker 1>just some non competitive swings against higher quality secondaries. And

1:09:57.200 --> 1:09:58.920
<v Speaker 1>then on the on the on the defensive side of things,

1:09:59.560 --> 1:10:02.639
<v Speaker 1>there's all of the tools to be a plus defender

1:10:02.880 --> 1:10:04.360
<v Speaker 1>and you look at me say, wow, this guy could

1:10:04.360 --> 1:10:07.679
<v Speaker 1>be awesome. He makes some acrobatic plays and difficult throws

1:10:07.720 --> 1:10:09.960
<v Speaker 1>of different angles and the range is so impressive. And

1:10:09.960 --> 1:10:12.560
<v Speaker 1>then other times he's sitting back on balls and just

1:10:12.960 --> 1:10:16.280
<v Speaker 1>they're eating them up, and you're like, what's going on here?

1:10:16.600 --> 1:10:19.479
<v Speaker 1>He made eighteen errors this season, And you see a

1:10:19.520 --> 1:10:21.600
<v Speaker 1>guy with the tools to be plus but booting the

1:10:21.720 --> 1:10:24.200
<v Speaker 1>routine and you just kind of like hit in your head,

1:10:24.240 --> 1:10:26.320
<v Speaker 1>You're like, what what's the deal here? In his drafter

1:10:26.439 --> 1:10:29.599
<v Speaker 1>is ops drops one hundred and fifty points. So that's

1:10:29.640 --> 1:10:32.920
<v Speaker 1>where with Lebron, like you've seen flashes of what could

1:10:32.960 --> 1:10:36.320
<v Speaker 1>be a really special player, but you've also seen frustration

1:10:36.560 --> 1:10:39.479
<v Speaker 1>in both sides of the game. So there's a world

1:10:39.479 --> 1:10:41.439
<v Speaker 1>where you hit to hit a parlay and it's you know,

1:10:41.760 --> 1:10:44.560
<v Speaker 1>a well above average bat and a plus shortstop. I

1:10:44.600 --> 1:10:46.200
<v Speaker 1>think a lot of things have to go right. But

1:10:46.280 --> 1:10:49.360
<v Speaker 1>then there's also a world where he's frustrating defensively and

1:10:49.400 --> 1:10:51.040
<v Speaker 1>whiffing all the time against secondaries.

1:10:52.080 --> 1:10:55.200
<v Speaker 3>I totally agree with you. I think Justin Lebron absolutely

1:10:55.320 --> 1:10:57.920
<v Speaker 3>is one of the most polarizing players in this entire draft.

1:10:59.040 --> 1:11:01.760
<v Speaker 3>But I feel like, and I know that you know,

1:11:02.080 --> 1:11:05.320
<v Speaker 3>we already finished all of our things on our docket,

1:11:05.840 --> 1:11:09.360
<v Speaker 3>but we would be remiss if we didn't talk about

1:11:09.720 --> 1:11:11.760
<v Speaker 3>the second pick in the MLB Draft and the fifth

1:11:11.760 --> 1:11:14.559
<v Speaker 3>pick in the MLB Draft, Grady Emerson to the Rays.

1:11:14.720 --> 1:11:17.599
<v Speaker 3>I mean, you said that this is your favorite player

1:11:17.680 --> 1:11:22.080
<v Speaker 3>in the draft, So we can't go the podcast, a

1:11:22.240 --> 1:11:25.719
<v Speaker 3>draft recap podcast without talking about these two picks. Because

1:11:25.880 --> 1:11:28.639
<v Speaker 3>when we were watching film, you also love Derek Curle.

1:11:28.720 --> 1:11:30.400
<v Speaker 3>So I want to hand it over to you to

1:11:30.439 --> 1:11:32.880
<v Speaker 3>talk about Grady Emerson to the Rays at number two

1:11:33.280 --> 1:11:36.320
<v Speaker 3>and Derek Curle to the Pirates at number five.

1:11:36.920 --> 1:11:40.799
<v Speaker 1>Yeah. I absolutely love Emerson. That's that's my top overall

1:11:40.840 --> 1:11:42.720
<v Speaker 1>player in the class. And I just I think this

1:11:42.840 --> 1:11:45.080
<v Speaker 1>is going to be another high school kid that just Rakes.

1:11:45.439 --> 1:11:47.840
<v Speaker 1>His swing is so advanced for his age, but he's

1:11:47.880 --> 1:11:50.320
<v Speaker 1>also I think has more juice in there than he's

1:11:50.320 --> 1:11:52.280
<v Speaker 1>getting credit for it. He reminds me so much of

1:11:52.560 --> 1:11:56.120
<v Speaker 1>and there's no relation but Cole Emerson, where the field

1:11:56.160 --> 1:11:59.240
<v Speaker 1>to hit is just stand out, it's just natural. And

1:11:59.360 --> 1:12:02.120
<v Speaker 1>then the two some kind of variables are how much

1:12:02.160 --> 1:12:04.320
<v Speaker 1>power does the ultimately grow into and what's the defense

1:12:04.360 --> 1:12:06.720
<v Speaker 1>going to look like? And I think Grady Emerson is

1:12:06.720 --> 1:12:09.559
<v Speaker 1>ahead of where Colt was defensively, but Colt is now

1:12:09.640 --> 1:12:12.360
<v Speaker 1>proven that he can be, you know, solid everyday defensive shortstop.

1:12:12.520 --> 1:12:15.160
<v Speaker 1>I think Grady the defense can be trained a little

1:12:15.200 --> 1:12:18.400
<v Speaker 1>bit more right like he could be an above average shortstop.

1:12:18.439 --> 1:12:20.479
<v Speaker 1>And if that's part of his game there, then the

1:12:20.520 --> 1:12:22.920
<v Speaker 1>biggest question becomes how much powers in there. I think

1:12:22.960 --> 1:12:25.400
<v Speaker 1>the hit can be plus if it's above average you know,

1:12:25.600 --> 1:12:28.640
<v Speaker 1>power to pair like, it's going to be a very

1:12:28.760 --> 1:12:30.880
<v Speaker 1>well rounded profile that's going to be difficult to book.

1:12:30.880 --> 1:12:32.960
<v Speaker 1>A hole in the makeup is really impressive. The way

1:12:32.960 --> 1:12:35.560
<v Speaker 1>he goes about his business, there's shades of like the

1:12:35.640 --> 1:12:37.439
<v Speaker 1>Jojo Parker side of things too, where I just think

1:12:37.439 --> 1:12:40.439
<v Speaker 1>he's gonna hit and hit and hit and with Jojo,

1:12:40.560 --> 1:12:42.960
<v Speaker 1>you don't have quite I think the range and the

1:12:43.040 --> 1:12:45.880
<v Speaker 1>quickness that Grady Emerson has. So if you have an

1:12:45.880 --> 1:12:48.880
<v Speaker 1>above average shortstop with just the feel to hit the

1:12:48.960 --> 1:12:51.639
<v Speaker 1>power potential that I think is being undersold, I think

1:12:51.680 --> 1:12:53.960
<v Speaker 1>Emerson has it has the ability to be just above

1:12:54.000 --> 1:12:57.280
<v Speaker 1>average tools across the board highlighted by what could be

1:12:57.479 --> 1:12:58.760
<v Speaker 1>just a plus hit tool.

1:12:59.600 --> 1:13:03.920
<v Speaker 3>And when I arrived from the airport, I walked into

1:13:04.080 --> 1:13:06.559
<v Speaker 3>our Airbnb and all of you guys are sitting around

1:13:06.720 --> 1:13:09.080
<v Speaker 3>and you got your laptop open, and I said, what

1:13:09.120 --> 1:13:11.719
<v Speaker 3>are you looking at. You're like, I'm watching Derek Currila

1:13:11.800 --> 1:13:14.280
<v Speaker 3>hit and I was like, what do you see? And

1:13:14.360 --> 1:13:17.080
<v Speaker 3>You're like, he's so hitterish. I love this guy, and

1:13:17.160 --> 1:13:19.040
<v Speaker 3>then he ends up going number five overall. And during

1:13:19.080 --> 1:13:20.600
<v Speaker 3>our draft room, I look right over at you and

1:13:20.640 --> 1:13:23.200
<v Speaker 3>I'm like, they took your guy. They took your guy.

1:13:24.160 --> 1:13:27.120
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, I just in a class where there was just

1:13:27.240 --> 1:13:29.800
<v Speaker 1>kind of unknown and like the outside of the rock

1:13:29.880 --> 1:13:32.280
<v Speaker 1>Emerson Lackey tier at the top and yeah, you can

1:13:32.320 --> 1:13:34.439
<v Speaker 1>maybe shadow just Eric Booth in the ceiling, and I

1:13:34.479 --> 1:13:37.840
<v Speaker 1>think you could throw Buris in there. But outside of

1:13:37.880 --> 1:13:41.160
<v Speaker 1>those guys, I think there's like Okay, there's a little

1:13:41.160 --> 1:13:42.800
<v Speaker 1>bit of swing and miss. Here's this guy gonna hit enough.

1:13:43.280 --> 1:13:44.960
<v Speaker 1>You know what kind of defensive value are going to

1:13:45.000 --> 1:13:46.840
<v Speaker 1>are you going to get? Curriel looks like you can

1:13:46.880 --> 1:13:49.040
<v Speaker 1>give you above average defense and center and this might

1:13:49.120 --> 1:13:50.960
<v Speaker 1>be the best bat to ball guy in the draft.

1:13:50.960 --> 1:13:53.519
<v Speaker 1>And I know the contact rates like are are probably

1:13:53.560 --> 1:13:55.519
<v Speaker 1>really similar to like his ion rows. But for me,

1:13:56.000 --> 1:13:58.280
<v Speaker 1>Curriel's bat to ball is going to translate to you know,

1:13:58.680 --> 1:14:01.240
<v Speaker 1>more hits, at least at this where the swing is

1:14:01.320 --> 1:14:03.439
<v Speaker 1>more geared for you know, I think loft to all

1:14:03.560 --> 1:14:07.040
<v Speaker 1>fields despite him not being a big power guy. That again,

1:14:07.080 --> 1:14:09.000
<v Speaker 1>I think he can go get it in center field

1:14:09.240 --> 1:14:11.280
<v Speaker 1>and you're seeing him at least be what I think

1:14:11.280 --> 1:14:13.400
<v Speaker 1>could be an above average defender your pair of that

1:14:13.520 --> 1:14:15.960
<v Speaker 1>with just such a good feel for the barrel, it's

1:14:16.000 --> 1:14:18.000
<v Speaker 1>tough to beat him inside. He can shoot balls. The

1:14:18.080 --> 1:14:21.040
<v Speaker 1>other way, he can I think, surprise you with a

1:14:21.160 --> 1:14:23.439
<v Speaker 1>little bit more thumped than expected. And if he's able

1:14:23.439 --> 1:14:26.120
<v Speaker 1>to sneak out eight to ten homers with the ability

1:14:26.160 --> 1:14:28.880
<v Speaker 1>to split the gaps all the time both ways, spoil

1:14:29.000 --> 1:14:31.320
<v Speaker 1>tough pitches, feel for the zone and just overall feel

1:14:31.360 --> 1:14:33.720
<v Speaker 1>for the barrel. This is such a high probability big

1:14:33.800 --> 1:14:36.639
<v Speaker 1>leaguer with the ability to stick in center as well,

1:14:37.000 --> 1:14:40.120
<v Speaker 1>that I could totally understand why the pirates said, Hey,

1:14:40.240 --> 1:14:41.880
<v Speaker 1>he might not have the ceiling as some of these

1:14:41.920 --> 1:14:43.840
<v Speaker 1>other guys, but we'll take him at five and be

1:14:43.920 --> 1:14:44.519
<v Speaker 1>happy about it.

1:14:45.120 --> 1:14:48.320
<v Speaker 3>So that's our draft recap, and we didn't talk about

1:14:48.360 --> 1:14:51.320
<v Speaker 3>every pick, but if you're curious our thoughts on every pick,

1:14:51.479 --> 1:14:54.120
<v Speaker 3>check out our YouTube channel. We did a three and

1:14:54.160 --> 1:14:56.120
<v Speaker 3>a half I think it was three hours and fifteen

1:14:56.160 --> 1:15:00.479
<v Speaker 3>minute live stream where it's arm, it's myself, it's Tyler Jennings,

1:15:01.120 --> 1:15:03.439
<v Speaker 3>is ahead of amateur scouting here at Just Baseball talking

1:15:03.520 --> 1:15:07.360
<v Speaker 3>through every single pick. So and because I love you all,

1:15:07.600 --> 1:15:11.200
<v Speaker 3>I timestamped that entire three hour thing so you can

1:15:11.240 --> 1:15:14.800
<v Speaker 3>even score right to your team's player. If we didn't

1:15:14.840 --> 1:15:16.200
<v Speaker 3>mention it, I thought we got through a ton of

1:15:16.240 --> 1:15:18.040
<v Speaker 3>picks and this one I had a lot of fun.

1:15:18.120 --> 1:15:20.600
<v Speaker 3>Hopefully you did too, and I hope that everybody in

1:15:20.640 --> 1:15:23.360
<v Speaker 3>our YouTube comments section did as well. The best way

1:15:23.400 --> 1:15:25.679
<v Speaker 3>to support the Just Baseball Show is to make sure

1:15:25.720 --> 1:15:28.360
<v Speaker 3>that you smash the like button and hit that big

1:15:28.479 --> 1:15:31.599
<v Speaker 3>red subscribe button. And for all the audio folks leaving

1:15:31.640 --> 1:15:34.280
<v Speaker 3>a five star review is the best way to help

1:15:34.320 --> 1:15:36.840
<v Speaker 3>out the show. Before we end ARM, let's quickly shout

1:15:36.920 --> 1:15:40.160
<v Speaker 3>out Other Half Brewing are event on Tuesday for the

1:15:40.280 --> 1:15:43.360
<v Speaker 3>All Star Game again at Other Half Brewing seven to

1:15:43.479 --> 1:15:46.880
<v Speaker 3>eleven PM, five dollars beers. Folks coming out with us.

1:15:47.080 --> 1:15:50.439
<v Speaker 3>Drink five dollar beers. Then you get MLB trivia and prizes,

1:15:50.680 --> 1:15:53.680
<v Speaker 3>watch the Alctar game together, come on down and then

1:15:54.080 --> 1:15:58.120
<v Speaker 3>on Monday, we're doing a meet and greet with Philly

1:15:58.200 --> 1:16:03.360
<v Speaker 3>Starr Ryan Howard at ten am. And that is Podcast P.

1:16:03.479 --> 1:16:04.760
<v Speaker 3>You're going to have to put the graphic up. I

1:16:04.880 --> 1:16:06.960
<v Speaker 3>just forget the name of this mall. It's the Lydds

1:16:07.160 --> 1:16:09.960
<v Speaker 3>Fashion District Mall, Monday at.

1:16:09.920 --> 1:16:12.160
<v Speaker 1>The Fashion District Mall. But I keep reading the sentence

1:16:12.280 --> 1:16:14.720
<v Speaker 1>Lidd's Fashion District Mall too, and I keep saying that.

1:16:15.200 --> 1:16:17.920
<v Speaker 3>What we do know It's Monday, July thirteenth at ten

1:16:18.080 --> 1:16:23.000
<v Speaker 3>am the Lids store at the Fashion District Mall in Philly,

1:16:23.600 --> 1:16:27.920
<v Speaker 3>Meet and greet with Ryan Howard. Special shout out also

1:16:28.000 --> 1:16:31.160
<v Speaker 3>to Podcast P for brilliant producing once again for arm Layton.

1:16:31.520 --> 1:16:34.599
<v Speaker 3>I'm Peter Apple. We'll see you live here on YouTube

1:16:34.640 --> 1:16:36.920
<v Speaker 3>one thirty pm Eastern on Tuesday, we're going to do

1:16:37.000 --> 1:16:40.280
<v Speaker 3>home Run derby recap Ulstar game preview. We'll think about

1:16:40.360 --> 1:16:42.800
<v Speaker 3>something else, but until then, with that, thank you for