WEBVTT - Gavet on Need for Business Leaders to Empathize

0:00:00.520 --> 0:00:04.080
<v Speaker 1>You're listening to Bloomberg Business Week with Carol Masser and

0:00:04.240 --> 0:00:07.560
<v Speaker 1>Jason Kelly on Bloomberg Radio. All right, I'm just gonna

0:00:07.560 --> 0:00:09.680
<v Speaker 1>put it out there. I have been looking forward to

0:00:09.760 --> 0:00:12.639
<v Speaker 1>this next sixty minutes of our podcast. Really excited to

0:00:12.720 --> 0:00:15.800
<v Speaker 1>about our next guest. She's a tech executive, entrepreneur, also

0:00:16.280 --> 0:00:20.200
<v Speaker 1>former CEO Russia's largest e commerce site. She oversaw global

0:00:20.239 --> 0:00:22.560
<v Speaker 1>operations of the Price Line Group. She's an advocate for

0:00:22.640 --> 0:00:27.200
<v Speaker 1>empathetic tech, former CEO at Compass. Uh. Settle into a

0:00:27.200 --> 0:00:30.280
<v Speaker 1>comfy chair as we welcome my elgove A. She is

0:00:30.280 --> 0:00:32.560
<v Speaker 1>here to talk about the world of technology. Her book

0:00:33.040 --> 0:00:37.199
<v Speaker 1>just out Trampled by Unicorns, Big text empathy problem and

0:00:37.320 --> 0:00:40.400
<v Speaker 1>really how to fix it? I added the really, Uh

0:00:40.479 --> 0:00:42.559
<v Speaker 1>it's such a relevant topic, and she joins us on

0:00:42.600 --> 0:00:45.760
<v Speaker 1>the phone in New York City. Um My yell, thank you,

0:00:46.080 --> 0:00:48.559
<v Speaker 1>so delighted to have you here with Jason and myself. Welcome,

0:00:49.560 --> 0:00:52.720
<v Speaker 1>my pleasure high Carol, Hi, Jason. So we're trying to

0:00:52.720 --> 0:00:55.080
<v Speaker 1>figure out where to stop start because there's so much

0:00:55.080 --> 0:00:59.440
<v Speaker 1>going on in humanity, humanity as it relates to technology.

0:00:59.640 --> 0:01:02.240
<v Speaker 1>Maybe let's start with why did you want to write

0:01:02.240 --> 0:01:04.680
<v Speaker 1>this book? What were you hoping, you know, to get

0:01:04.680 --> 0:01:07.160
<v Speaker 1>out there to the masses. What kind of conversation did

0:01:07.200 --> 0:01:11.280
<v Speaker 1>you want to get going. I really wanted to have

0:01:11.800 --> 0:01:14.679
<v Speaker 1>to really big conversation. I want to want to have

0:01:14.720 --> 0:01:17.319
<v Speaker 1>a conversation about where we are right now, because I

0:01:17.400 --> 0:01:19.840
<v Speaker 1>felt like a lot of what I was reading in

0:01:19.880 --> 0:01:24.959
<v Speaker 1>the media or in books was extremely one sided. It

0:01:25.120 --> 0:01:29.200
<v Speaker 1>was usually UM saying either tech is amazing or tech

0:01:29.400 --> 0:01:32.000
<v Speaker 1>is horrible. And I was reading all of that and saying, no,

0:01:32.360 --> 0:01:34.640
<v Speaker 1>there's some good, there's some bad, and there's some ugly,

0:01:35.040 --> 0:01:38.080
<v Speaker 1>and I'd like us to have a really exhausted view

0:01:38.160 --> 0:01:40.520
<v Speaker 1>on where do we stand, what are the good things

0:01:40.520 --> 0:01:42.440
<v Speaker 1>that happened, and what are the things we need to fix,

0:01:42.840 --> 0:01:45.759
<v Speaker 1>and really try to go to the core of why

0:01:45.880 --> 0:01:50.000
<v Speaker 1>we have a deficit of empathy in the technical system.

0:01:50.080 --> 0:01:53.600
<v Speaker 1>And then once we uh we align on how we

0:01:53.640 --> 0:01:56.880
<v Speaker 1>got where we are and why UM and and and

0:01:56.920 --> 0:01:59.400
<v Speaker 1>why we are where we are, then I wanted to

0:01:59.400 --> 0:02:02.919
<v Speaker 1>really focus some solutions. I'm a I'm a solution oriented person.

0:02:03.000 --> 0:02:06.560
<v Speaker 1>I'm very optimistic in general, and I wanted to have

0:02:06.680 --> 0:02:09.520
<v Speaker 1>a conversation about what we can do and we being

0:02:09.560 --> 0:02:13.839
<v Speaker 1>a very broad we like we the tech executive tech

0:02:13.919 --> 0:02:17.480
<v Speaker 1>employees that the group I belonged to, I mean worked

0:02:17.480 --> 0:02:20.960
<v Speaker 1>in tex for fifteen years. But we as also as users,

0:02:21.400 --> 0:02:25.000
<v Speaker 1>we as investors, we as governments and regulators, and I

0:02:25.040 --> 0:02:27.000
<v Speaker 1>thought that there was a role for every one of

0:02:27.120 --> 0:02:32.720
<v Speaker 1>us to play in really making tech UM an instrument

0:02:32.840 --> 0:02:35.720
<v Speaker 1>to advance humanity even more than it has been so far.

0:02:36.480 --> 0:02:38.440
<v Speaker 1>So let's talk about the deficit if we can have

0:02:38.480 --> 0:02:41.880
<v Speaker 1>the starting point, Because you know what you point out

0:02:41.919 --> 0:02:45.320
<v Speaker 1>in this book, we have all really seen I feel like,

0:02:45.400 --> 0:02:50.200
<v Speaker 1>come to the fore in a troubling way, especially over

0:02:50.320 --> 0:02:53.399
<v Speaker 1>the past few years. Even before I think we entered

0:02:53.440 --> 0:02:58.600
<v Speaker 1>into this broader social and societal reckoning around inequality, we

0:02:58.720 --> 0:03:00.960
<v Speaker 1>knew there was a problem in tech. How do we

0:03:01.000 --> 0:03:06.960
<v Speaker 1>get here? Well, that's a big question. UM. I think

0:03:07.000 --> 0:03:13.000
<v Speaker 1>that we got here through a complex set of um

0:03:14.080 --> 0:03:18.440
<v Speaker 1>of things related to tech. I think tech is very

0:03:18.560 --> 0:03:23.200
<v Speaker 1>insular from a cultural perspective, was very strong tribal myaths.

0:03:23.240 --> 0:03:26.880
<v Speaker 1>I talked in my book about many of them. One

0:03:26.919 --> 0:03:30.040
<v Speaker 1>of them is what I call the Steve job syndrome. Uh,

0:03:30.080 --> 0:03:33.320
<v Speaker 1>this idea that to be a genius you somehow have

0:03:33.440 --> 0:03:35.080
<v Speaker 1>to be a jerk. Like the two are kind of

0:03:35.240 --> 0:03:39.800
<v Speaker 1>really related. UH. This idea that technology is neutral, UM,

0:03:40.160 --> 0:03:43.840
<v Speaker 1>the myaths of perfect meritocracy, Like if you raised throughout

0:03:43.880 --> 0:03:46.880
<v Speaker 1>the ranks of technology, it's because you're that good at

0:03:46.880 --> 0:03:49.360
<v Speaker 1>your job, and the your n this is because you're

0:03:49.360 --> 0:03:51.200
<v Speaker 1>not that good at your job. And so that really

0:03:51.280 --> 0:03:56.080
<v Speaker 1>created an industry which in many aspects is very closed

0:03:56.280 --> 0:03:58.800
<v Speaker 1>UM and had a hard time because of a lack

0:03:58.840 --> 0:04:01.320
<v Speaker 1>of diversity, has a hard time to be empathetic to

0:04:01.400 --> 0:04:03.960
<v Speaker 1>the rest of the world. And when you're not empathetic,

0:04:04.440 --> 0:04:07.200
<v Speaker 1>it becomes hard for you to really understand the impact

0:04:07.240 --> 0:04:09.880
<v Speaker 1>that you're having on the world. So that's one very strong,

0:04:10.680 --> 0:04:12.920
<v Speaker 1>very strong issue. The second one I've just mentioned it

0:04:12.960 --> 0:04:17.040
<v Speaker 1>is the lack of diversity, women represent less and assertive

0:04:17.120 --> 0:04:20.359
<v Speaker 1>management UH and tech roles in big tech UH and

0:04:20.480 --> 0:04:23.599
<v Speaker 1>racial minorities in general less than ten percent of management

0:04:24.120 --> 0:04:27.160
<v Speaker 1>UH and way less than ten percent in text so

0:04:27.440 --> 0:04:30.400
<v Speaker 1>tech tech jobs. And then I think the last one

0:04:31.000 --> 0:04:36.719
<v Speaker 1>is UM what I would call a lack of accountability UM.

0:04:36.880 --> 0:04:41.599
<v Speaker 1>And it's because we we as as tech people, we

0:04:41.720 --> 0:04:44.800
<v Speaker 1>believe so strongly that we were on our path on

0:04:44.880 --> 0:04:47.720
<v Speaker 1>the past to change the world that if there were

0:04:47.760 --> 0:04:50.400
<v Speaker 1>some bumps on the road, if there were some mistake made,

0:04:50.440 --> 0:04:52.960
<v Speaker 1>it didn't really matter because we were working towards the

0:04:52.960 --> 0:04:56.120
<v Speaker 1>greater good. And I think because of that, and then

0:04:56.240 --> 0:04:59.320
<v Speaker 1>also the fact that the regulator didn't always understand what

0:04:59.360 --> 0:05:01.760
<v Speaker 1>it is that we we're doing, and I think the

0:05:02.240 --> 0:05:07.360
<v Speaker 1>users got really amazed by all the free services that

0:05:07.400 --> 0:05:09.920
<v Speaker 1>they get that that they got. I think the combination

0:05:09.960 --> 0:05:13.120
<v Speaker 1>of all of that created this environment where UH tech

0:05:13.160 --> 0:05:15.920
<v Speaker 1>companies could pretty much do anything they wanted without having

0:05:16.000 --> 0:05:19.039
<v Speaker 1>to really be accountable. And that's obviously changing now. But

0:05:19.120 --> 0:05:22.200
<v Speaker 1>I think if you combine this cultural installarity, the lack

0:05:22.240 --> 0:05:25.400
<v Speaker 1>of diversity, and the lack of accountability, you end up

0:05:25.520 --> 0:05:27.720
<v Speaker 1>where we are right now. So somebody like we've got

0:05:27.720 --> 0:05:29.360
<v Speaker 1>about a minute or so left and then we've got

0:05:29.360 --> 0:05:30.839
<v Speaker 1>to do some news. We're gonna come back and talk

0:05:30.920 --> 0:05:33.640
<v Speaker 1>some more. UM my help. But so somebody like a

0:05:33.680 --> 0:05:40.400
<v Speaker 1>Mark Zuckerberg good bad? How do you see him? Um?

0:05:40.520 --> 0:05:42.840
<v Speaker 1>I think every person has some good and some bad.

0:05:42.920 --> 0:05:46.640
<v Speaker 1>I think it's clearly a business business genius, and it's

0:05:46.720 --> 0:05:50.080
<v Speaker 1>really strong at building a one in a lifetime company.

0:05:50.960 --> 0:05:54.000
<v Speaker 1>I think, to use the wording that one of my

0:05:54.040 --> 0:05:57.680
<v Speaker 1>previous company, dcg UH used, there may be some areas

0:05:57.680 --> 0:06:02.640
<v Speaker 1>for improvements around empathy in connection to people. Yeah. My,

0:06:02.920 --> 0:06:05.240
<v Speaker 1>I have to tell you the cover is phenomenal. It's

0:06:05.360 --> 0:06:10.200
<v Speaker 1>so striking and uh, really attention grabbing. So congratulations on

0:06:10.480 --> 0:06:14.120
<v Speaker 1>that as well. So let's talk solutions. Uh, what's the

0:06:14.200 --> 0:06:16.919
<v Speaker 1>first step here? What's the easy, low hanging fruit to

0:06:17.040 --> 0:06:20.919
<v Speaker 1>try and be more empathetic when it comes to big tech? So,

0:06:21.080 --> 0:06:23.480
<v Speaker 1>given your audience, I want to start by saying, I'm

0:06:23.480 --> 0:06:26.720
<v Speaker 1>a capitalist at hard I'm not advocating for empathy just

0:06:26.800 --> 0:06:28.920
<v Speaker 1>because it's all going to make us feel good. I'm

0:06:28.920 --> 0:06:31.720
<v Speaker 1>advocating for empathy because I believe it's good for business.

0:06:31.800 --> 0:06:35.520
<v Speaker 1>And in my book I talk about a research or

0:06:35.560 --> 0:06:39.520
<v Speaker 1>study that was done that demonstrated that empathetic company conscious

0:06:39.560 --> 0:06:44.000
<v Speaker 1>companies outperformed the SMP five index by a factor of ten.

0:06:44.680 --> 0:06:48.640
<v Speaker 1>So it is actually really good for business. Uh. Now,

0:06:48.680 --> 0:06:51.240
<v Speaker 1>what can't be done? A lot of things can be done.

0:06:51.320 --> 0:06:54.239
<v Speaker 1>It can be done by the leaders inside the company.

0:06:54.320 --> 0:06:58.840
<v Speaker 1>Like at Microsoft. I think it's been an unbelievable an

0:06:58.920 --> 0:07:01.880
<v Speaker 1>unbelievable model role model for what can't be done in

0:07:02.000 --> 0:07:06.120
<v Speaker 1>terms of putting empathy and basically people caring for people

0:07:06.480 --> 0:07:09.159
<v Speaker 1>in everything you do. Starting with the mission, the vision,

0:07:09.279 --> 0:07:13.240
<v Speaker 1>the values, of the company, and then continuing with things

0:07:13.280 --> 0:07:15.760
<v Speaker 1>like how do you recruit more empathetic people, how do

0:07:15.800 --> 0:07:18.760
<v Speaker 1>you make sure that you give them a voice, how

0:07:18.800 --> 0:07:22.120
<v Speaker 1>to use change your processes, your decision processes so that

0:07:23.040 --> 0:07:25.760
<v Speaker 1>the impact that you're having not just on your immediate

0:07:25.800 --> 0:07:28.160
<v Speaker 1>customers but also on the world around you are actually

0:07:28.240 --> 0:07:30.640
<v Speaker 1>taken into account. So there's a ton of things that

0:07:30.680 --> 0:07:33.680
<v Speaker 1>can be done. No silver Bulleitz, but like a pretty

0:07:33.720 --> 0:07:38.840
<v Speaker 1>long list. Um. And then it goes outside the leadership

0:07:38.840 --> 0:07:41.480
<v Speaker 1>team or the employees. He goes to the boards and

0:07:41.520 --> 0:07:44.240
<v Speaker 1>the investors, the public market, the net back in the

0:07:44.280 --> 0:07:47.440
<v Speaker 1>New York stock stock extras have a huge impact on

0:07:47.520 --> 0:07:49.840
<v Speaker 1>the way companies are being are being run. And then

0:07:49.840 --> 0:07:52.239
<v Speaker 1>it goes all the way to the regulator, the media,

0:07:52.600 --> 0:07:54.960
<v Speaker 1>the consumer. And so my book just basically go chapter

0:07:55.400 --> 0:07:57.840
<v Speaker 1>chapter by chapters for every one of these takeholders and

0:07:57.960 --> 0:08:00.600
<v Speaker 1>just say, hey, here is ten twenty fifty things that

0:08:00.640 --> 0:08:04.760
<v Speaker 1>you could potentially try to do. Can every tech company

0:08:04.960 --> 0:08:11.520
<v Speaker 1>be run this way, have empathy and be successful? That

0:08:11.680 --> 0:08:14.680
<v Speaker 1>is an extremely smart question. I believe that they all

0:08:14.840 --> 0:08:17.280
<v Speaker 1>should do it that way. I think that for some

0:08:17.360 --> 0:08:19.760
<v Speaker 1>of them it's going to be a massive challenge because

0:08:19.760 --> 0:08:23.400
<v Speaker 1>of the culture they have inside and what it would

0:08:23.400 --> 0:08:25.680
<v Speaker 1>mean in terms of changing their business model and the

0:08:25.680 --> 0:08:28.640
<v Speaker 1>way they make money. I do believe though, and again

0:08:28.680 --> 0:08:31.520
<v Speaker 1>I I I a quoted that that study. I do

0:08:31.640 --> 0:08:33.520
<v Speaker 1>believe that in the long term, if you want to

0:08:33.559 --> 0:08:36.880
<v Speaker 1>build a profitable, sustainable business that is going to be

0:08:37.000 --> 0:08:39.319
<v Speaker 1>still around not five years from non o ten years

0:08:39.360 --> 0:08:41.400
<v Speaker 1>from now, but like a hundred years from now, it's

0:08:41.400 --> 0:08:44.199
<v Speaker 1>just you have to It would be completely insane as

0:08:44.200 --> 0:08:47.200
<v Speaker 1>a business leader to not make sure that you care

0:08:47.200 --> 0:08:49.640
<v Speaker 1>about the impact that you have on on the world.

0:08:50.520 --> 0:08:52.240
<v Speaker 1>But do you know what I'm saying right Like? You

0:08:52.320 --> 0:08:54.600
<v Speaker 1>just do wonder, Like I I think Jason and I

0:08:54.640 --> 0:08:57.560
<v Speaker 1>would you know, handily agree with you that this is

0:08:57.600 --> 0:09:00.000
<v Speaker 1>the way to do things. And I think younger employed

0:09:00.080 --> 0:09:02.640
<v Speaker 1>ease care about this a lot more. But I just

0:09:02.679 --> 0:09:05.760
<v Speaker 1>do wonder. I think it's going to be really hard. Look,

0:09:05.760 --> 0:09:08.160
<v Speaker 1>I mean the very honest sensory. I think among big

0:09:08.160 --> 0:09:10.839
<v Speaker 1>tech there as there are some companies for which is

0:09:10.880 --> 0:09:13.720
<v Speaker 1>going to be painful but possible. I think there are

0:09:13.720 --> 0:09:17.200
<v Speaker 1>some companies for which is going to be incredibly difficult,

0:09:17.360 --> 0:09:20.520
<v Speaker 1>and they may not just have the resistance to pain

0:09:20.559 --> 0:09:22.679
<v Speaker 1>and the will to make that happen, which by the way,

0:09:22.800 --> 0:09:25.360
<v Speaker 1>means that they may actually be forced in one way

0:09:25.440 --> 0:09:29.280
<v Speaker 1>or another again, either by the users, the advertisers, which

0:09:29.320 --> 0:09:31.640
<v Speaker 1>also are very powerful, or at the end of the day,

0:09:31.640 --> 0:09:35.720
<v Speaker 1>the regulators. And I advocated in my book that I'd

0:09:35.840 --> 0:09:38.720
<v Speaker 1>much rather for the industry to self regulate. I don't.

0:09:38.760 --> 0:09:41.400
<v Speaker 1>I live in in Russia and in China. I know

0:09:41.520 --> 0:09:43.920
<v Speaker 1>first time what it is to have an overbearing government.

0:09:44.040 --> 0:09:46.839
<v Speaker 1>I definitely do not want that. But at the same time,

0:09:46.880 --> 0:09:50.320
<v Speaker 1>staff regulation has never worked in any industry, and so

0:09:50.520 --> 0:09:53.920
<v Speaker 1>the challenge these days is really about finding the right balance.

0:09:53.960 --> 0:09:56.680
<v Speaker 1>And I think we'll go faster to that finding that

0:09:56.800 --> 0:10:00.800
<v Speaker 1>right balance if big tech actually texts accountability and really

0:10:00.840 --> 0:10:04.520
<v Speaker 1>really start thinking about how to put humanity front and center. Well,

0:10:04.520 --> 0:10:07.360
<v Speaker 1>and my l and you know better than we do

0:10:07.480 --> 0:10:11.640
<v Speaker 1>that tech, especially here certainly over the last ten twenty years,

0:10:11.880 --> 0:10:14.960
<v Speaker 1>has really set the tone for so many types of companies,

0:10:15.200 --> 0:10:17.360
<v Speaker 1>even beyond the text fear. I mean, we all look

0:10:17.400 --> 0:10:21.319
<v Speaker 1>to Silicon Valley and its ideals in many ways for inspiration.

0:10:22.559 --> 0:10:26.400
<v Speaker 1>Totally sorry, I mean there's been a transformative driver of

0:10:26.480 --> 0:10:29.920
<v Speaker 1>the world in general. So and again to start to

0:10:30.080 --> 0:10:31.600
<v Speaker 1>go back to what I was saying at the beginning

0:10:31.640 --> 0:10:34.040
<v Speaker 1>for good, for bet and ugly, I think we shouldn't

0:10:34.760 --> 0:10:38.960
<v Speaker 1>completely discount the fact that they have actually really really

0:10:39.000 --> 0:10:42.400
<v Speaker 1>helped millions, ignal hundreds of millions of people in many

0:10:42.440 --> 0:10:45.079
<v Speaker 1>aspects of their life. So that's very positive. What what

0:10:45.120 --> 0:10:48.280
<v Speaker 1>I want is to make sure that it's continues that

0:10:48.360 --> 0:10:51.719
<v Speaker 1>way and all the negative impact that is being surfaced

0:10:51.720 --> 0:10:56.800
<v Speaker 1>more and more is actually taken I mean taken under control. Again.

0:10:57.000 --> 0:10:59.280
<v Speaker 1>Can I just ask you real quickly and something, Jason,

0:10:59.280 --> 0:11:01.680
<v Speaker 1>I've talked a lot about TikTok I just got about

0:11:01.720 --> 0:11:04.120
<v Speaker 1>a minute or so left. I mean, the pushback against

0:11:04.120 --> 0:11:06.800
<v Speaker 1>the US is that a good thing? Does that make sense?

0:11:06.920 --> 0:11:09.880
<v Speaker 1>Does should we? Should the US be taking a stand

0:11:10.040 --> 0:11:15.280
<v Speaker 1>on companies like this? So my general view is that

0:11:15.679 --> 0:11:19.760
<v Speaker 1>the rule of government is to give um, to give guidelines,

0:11:19.960 --> 0:11:23.000
<v Speaker 1>and not so much to be involving a very specific deals.

0:11:23.280 --> 0:11:26.160
<v Speaker 1>I think TikTok is is just at the beginning that

0:11:26.240 --> 0:11:28.320
<v Speaker 1>death hasn't really settled, so it's hard to have a

0:11:28.320 --> 0:11:30.959
<v Speaker 1>definitive view on the final impact. I would I would

0:11:30.960 --> 0:11:34.080
<v Speaker 1>be very cautious, as I say, in having government going

0:11:34.120 --> 0:11:38.560
<v Speaker 1>to give into business into business deals, because governments at

0:11:38.640 --> 0:11:40.360
<v Speaker 1>least in the West don't really have a good track

0:11:40.440 --> 0:11:43.360
<v Speaker 1>record kind of thing, and it's something we're critical about

0:11:43.440 --> 0:11:48.520
<v Speaker 1>other governments where you're so involved. Yeah, exactly as you

0:11:48.559 --> 0:11:51.080
<v Speaker 1>say that your experience in China and Russia has taught

0:11:51.120 --> 0:11:54.000
<v Speaker 1>you that better than anything. Alright, my elegravate, Thank you

0:11:54.080 --> 0:11:57.200
<v Speaker 1>so much. Congratulations. It is your launch day for this book,

0:11:57.200 --> 0:12:00.199
<v Speaker 1>Trampled by Unicorns, big text empathy problem and how to

0:12:00.240 --> 0:12:02.640
<v Speaker 1>fix it. I think it's so telling that a book

0:12:02.760 --> 0:12:07.120
<v Speaker 1>is out here in that has the word empathy in it.

0:12:07.280 --> 0:12:11.240
<v Speaker 1>I mean, like, not productivity, not managing your time better,

0:12:11.640 --> 0:12:15.280
<v Speaker 1>not success, but empathy. I think that's very notable. Yeah,

0:12:15.320 --> 0:12:17.679
<v Speaker 1>I have I have not heard that right in all

0:12:17.679 --> 0:12:20.320
<v Speaker 1>the discussions that we have. It's a very different way

0:12:20.360 --> 0:12:22.640
<v Speaker 1>of thinking about it, but an important when we hear

0:12:22.640 --> 0:12:25.439
<v Speaker 1>about culture a lot, but empathy is a whole different level.

0:12:25.520 --> 0:12:27.760
<v Speaker 1>And you're right, Jason, very very important.