WEBVTT - From the Vault: Anthology of Horror, Volume 2

0:00:05.720 --> 0:00:08.320
<v Speaker 1>Hey, welcome to Stuff to Blow Your Mind. My name

0:00:08.360 --> 0:00:11.440
<v Speaker 1>is Robert Lamb and I'm Joe McCormick, and it's Saturday

0:00:11.760 --> 0:00:17.000
<v Speaker 1>vault time, folks. This episode originally aired on October nineteen,

0:00:17.440 --> 0:00:21.640
<v Speaker 1>and it is our Anthology of Horror volume two. That's right.

0:00:22.280 --> 0:00:25.720
<v Speaker 1>I mean we'll introduce this in the episode itself, but briefly,

0:00:26.000 --> 0:00:28.800
<v Speaker 1>this is you know and Thought TV anthology episodes that

0:00:28.840 --> 0:00:31.320
<v Speaker 1>are horror themed. We take them, we use them as

0:00:31.320 --> 0:00:34.160
<v Speaker 1>a springboard to talk about science. This was the second

0:00:34.200 --> 0:00:37.280
<v Speaker 1>one in this series, and we'll be sharing the third

0:00:37.280 --> 0:00:39.159
<v Speaker 1>one in the series as a vault episode in the

0:00:39.159 --> 0:00:41.720
<v Speaker 1>weeks ahead, and hey, might even get an all new

0:00:41.920 --> 0:00:48.000
<v Speaker 1>fourth volume. We'll see what we can put together. Welcome

0:00:48.040 --> 0:00:49.680
<v Speaker 1>to Stuff to Blow Your Mind, a production of I

0:00:49.760 --> 0:00:59.080
<v Speaker 1>Heart Radios How Stuff Works. Hello, Welcome to Stuff to

0:00:59.160 --> 0:01:02.280
<v Speaker 1>Blow Your Mind, and my name is Robert Gooley Lamb.

0:01:02.520 --> 0:01:05.680
<v Speaker 1>I am Corrosive Joseph McCormick, and we are here with

0:01:05.720 --> 0:01:09.280
<v Speaker 1>our producer death Nicholas Johnson. Yes, and it is that

0:01:09.360 --> 0:01:12.319
<v Speaker 1>time again. Uh, it's it's been a year since we

0:01:12.440 --> 0:01:16.279
<v Speaker 1>did Anthology of Horror volume one, and so we're about

0:01:16.319 --> 0:01:21.680
<v Speaker 1>to assault you with Anthology of Horror volume two, and

0:01:21.680 --> 0:01:24.120
<v Speaker 1>then guess what the episode after this, He's going to

0:01:24.160 --> 0:01:28.039
<v Speaker 1>be Anthology of Horror volume three. It's not an anthology

0:01:28.120 --> 0:01:31.000
<v Speaker 1>unless they're at least three volume exactly. So yeah, I've

0:01:31.000 --> 0:01:34.160
<v Speaker 1>been looking forward to this all year pretty much, Robert.

0:01:34.200 --> 0:01:36.640
<v Speaker 1>I know the back corners of your brain are just

0:01:36.920 --> 0:01:41.520
<v Speaker 1>full of cobwebs made of old horror anthology TV episodes.

0:01:41.880 --> 0:01:44.880
<v Speaker 1>Every time we get talking about this, you dredge something

0:01:44.959 --> 0:01:47.920
<v Speaker 1>up from the void, something you saw on TV as

0:01:47.960 --> 0:01:50.520
<v Speaker 1>a kid. Am I wrong about this? Pretty much? Because

0:01:50.720 --> 0:01:52.640
<v Speaker 1>when I was a kid, I watched a lot of television,

0:01:52.760 --> 0:01:56.080
<v Speaker 1>and of the various joyfully weird things that were on

0:01:56.160 --> 0:02:01.560
<v Speaker 1>television reruns or syndicated horror and oology shows were one

0:02:01.560 --> 0:02:03.520
<v Speaker 1>of the best because you never knew exactly what you're

0:02:03.560 --> 0:02:05.960
<v Speaker 1>going to get each episode. It's an anthology. So each

0:02:05.960 --> 0:02:09.840
<v Speaker 1>episode of something like The Twilight Zone or Night Gallery

0:02:10.040 --> 0:02:13.160
<v Speaker 1>or Outer Limits or Tales from the Crypt, each one

0:02:13.240 --> 0:02:15.880
<v Speaker 1>is its own thing, its own world. It has its

0:02:15.880 --> 0:02:20.440
<v Speaker 1>own cast, its own monster or threat or sci fi weirdness,

0:02:20.840 --> 0:02:25.200
<v Speaker 1>and it's completely encapsulated. I love especially some of these

0:02:25.200 --> 0:02:27.960
<v Speaker 1>are really good. Actually, the Twilight Zone I think is

0:02:28.280 --> 0:02:30.680
<v Speaker 1>even better than a lot of people remember, and I

0:02:30.680 --> 0:02:33.440
<v Speaker 1>think a lot of times it's because The Twilight Zone

0:02:33.600 --> 0:02:35.480
<v Speaker 1>was not an hour long show, or I think maybe

0:02:35.480 --> 0:02:37.760
<v Speaker 1>it was in one of its later seasons which turned

0:02:37.800 --> 0:02:40.360
<v Speaker 1>out to be disastrous. I mean, you know, this is

0:02:40.360 --> 0:02:44.480
<v Speaker 1>a type twentysomething minute short story. It's it's a good

0:02:44.520 --> 0:02:47.400
<v Speaker 1>way not to get bogged down and stuff that doesn't

0:02:47.440 --> 0:02:50.040
<v Speaker 1>matter with when you're not going into like in depth

0:02:50.160 --> 0:02:54.040
<v Speaker 1>character storytelling, but you're like exploring high level premises. Yeah,

0:02:54.120 --> 0:02:56.040
<v Speaker 1>you know, it's it's more it's more in line with

0:02:56.520 --> 0:02:58.320
<v Speaker 1>certainly some of the short stories you you know, the

0:02:58.320 --> 0:03:00.799
<v Speaker 1>classic short stories you think of a say like Philip K. Dick,

0:03:01.120 --> 0:03:03.400
<v Speaker 1>where it's it's really about rolling out a cool idea,

0:03:03.919 --> 0:03:06.720
<v Speaker 1>maybe a cool twist or a shock, but mostly about

0:03:06.800 --> 0:03:09.880
<v Speaker 1>you know, to make you think about something. And uh, yeah,

0:03:09.960 --> 0:03:12.960
<v Speaker 1>so I I love a really great episode of an

0:03:12.960 --> 0:03:15.320
<v Speaker 1>anthology show. Certainly, like you said, some of those Twilight

0:03:15.440 --> 0:03:18.760
<v Speaker 1>Zones hold up amazingly. Well, we're gonna be talking about

0:03:18.760 --> 0:03:21.600
<v Speaker 1>one of my favorites of all time today. Yeah, but

0:03:21.639 --> 0:03:25.440
<v Speaker 1>then also some of the worst examples. I have one show,

0:03:25.520 --> 0:03:26.880
<v Speaker 1>and this is a show I didn't I don't think

0:03:26.919 --> 0:03:29.919
<v Speaker 1>I even watched when it came on, but Perversions of Science.

0:03:30.800 --> 0:03:33.640
<v Speaker 1>It was sci fi sort of spinoff of Tales from

0:03:33.680 --> 0:03:37.640
<v Speaker 1>the Crypt and uh, I haven't watched fully sleazy, but

0:03:37.880 --> 0:03:41.840
<v Speaker 1>very like future smooth. Yeah. Yeah, lots of cursing, some

0:03:41.920 --> 0:03:44.800
<v Speaker 1>gratuitous nudity, but like a lot of these shows, often

0:03:45.040 --> 0:03:48.520
<v Speaker 1>tremendous talent packed into each episode, like some great actors,

0:03:49.080 --> 0:03:54.000
<v Speaker 1>some great directors. Um. So every horror anthology show, I

0:03:54.000 --> 0:03:56.120
<v Speaker 1>feel like the ones that i've I look back on

0:03:56.160 --> 0:03:58.480
<v Speaker 1>finally are the ones I haven't even seen yet. Uh,

0:03:58.560 --> 0:04:01.400
<v Speaker 1>there's so many treasures to ever. I watched so many

0:04:01.440 --> 0:04:05.800
<v Speaker 1>of these things. It's very specifically on Beach Hotel cable.

0:04:06.440 --> 0:04:08.520
<v Speaker 1>This is what I remember. Yeah, it was like I

0:04:08.520 --> 0:04:11.240
<v Speaker 1>watched Mystery Science Theater three thousand that way. I mean,

0:04:11.280 --> 0:04:13.360
<v Speaker 1>I guess basically when my family went to the beach,

0:04:13.400 --> 0:04:15.000
<v Speaker 1>everybody else would be out in the sun and I'd

0:04:15.040 --> 0:04:17.880
<v Speaker 1>be watching the sci fi channel. But that's how you

0:04:17.920 --> 0:04:22.599
<v Speaker 1>see reruns of Monsters, which is a show that I

0:04:22.600 --> 0:04:27.080
<v Speaker 1>had completely forgotten about until you you sent me something

0:04:27.120 --> 0:04:29.520
<v Speaker 1>about it the other day and I was looking at

0:04:29.520 --> 0:04:31.640
<v Speaker 1>the images from the opening credits and I was like,

0:04:31.680 --> 0:04:35.360
<v Speaker 1>oh my god, yes, that's way back in there. Somewhere

0:04:35.600 --> 0:04:38.320
<v Speaker 1>deep in the recesses of my mind. This is there.

0:04:38.440 --> 0:04:41.279
<v Speaker 1>I've seen it before, all right, Well, before we get

0:04:41.360 --> 0:04:44.760
<v Speaker 1>more properly into into monsters, I just want to tell everybody,

0:04:44.800 --> 0:04:47.279
<v Speaker 1>like what the basic format here is. If you haven't

0:04:47.320 --> 0:04:49.479
<v Speaker 1>heard one of our anthority of horror episodes before, or

0:04:49.520 --> 0:04:53.760
<v Speaker 1>the creepy Pasta episodes that preceded it, the idea is, uh,

0:04:54.080 --> 0:04:56.480
<v Speaker 1>we're gonna grab a few in in each episode. We're

0:04:56.480 --> 0:04:59.880
<v Speaker 1>gonna each grab one episode of a horror anthology show.

0:05:00.120 --> 0:05:02.039
<v Speaker 1>We're gonna tell you what it's about, remind you what

0:05:02.080 --> 0:05:03.840
<v Speaker 1>it's about if you've seen it before, and then we're

0:05:03.839 --> 0:05:07.159
<v Speaker 1>gonna break down some of the ideas involved there, you know,

0:05:07.200 --> 0:05:11.320
<v Speaker 1>some of the science of the thing, whatever it happens

0:05:11.320 --> 0:05:12.839
<v Speaker 1>to to be, even if we have to shoehorn it

0:05:12.880 --> 0:05:15.560
<v Speaker 1>a little bit. And uh, and that's where the fun

0:05:15.680 --> 0:05:18.440
<v Speaker 1>is exactly. We are nothing if not experts at dragging

0:05:18.480 --> 0:05:23.479
<v Speaker 1>deep thoughts out of strangely shallow places. Yes. Uh again,

0:05:23.920 --> 0:05:26.120
<v Speaker 1>We're gonna also go to some I think some rather

0:05:26.160 --> 0:05:29.800
<v Speaker 1>deep waters in these twilight zones. Yeah, so let's begin

0:05:29.880 --> 0:05:33.520
<v Speaker 1>with monsters. Okay. This This ran for three seasons from

0:05:34.400 --> 0:05:37.039
<v Speaker 1>eight through ninete and I think I only caught it

0:05:37.120 --> 0:05:39.920
<v Speaker 1>once at like my aunt's house back in the day,

0:05:40.000 --> 0:05:41.640
<v Speaker 1>and I don't even know if it was in syndication

0:05:41.800 --> 0:05:44.200
<v Speaker 1>or on the Sci Fi channel after it had finished

0:05:44.200 --> 0:05:47.200
<v Speaker 1>its run. But today you can find all of it

0:05:47.240 --> 0:05:50.039
<v Speaker 1>on Amazon Prime. You can find a lot of the episodes,

0:05:50.080 --> 0:05:53.880
<v Speaker 1>maybe all of them just on YouTube. But but yeah,

0:05:53.880 --> 0:05:55.599
<v Speaker 1>it's like a lot of these shows, it's a wealth

0:05:55.640 --> 0:05:58.799
<v Speaker 1>of talent and weirdness. I was wondering how many people

0:05:58.880 --> 0:06:02.200
<v Speaker 1>were hoping that this show would have disappeared into history forever,

0:06:02.600 --> 0:06:05.120
<v Speaker 1>only to have the digital age to revive all of

0:06:05.160 --> 0:06:10.039
<v Speaker 1>these old things that these actors did. Yeah, yeah, possible. Possibly, Yeah,

0:06:10.080 --> 0:06:12.840
<v Speaker 1>because there you see some some interesting people show up

0:06:12.920 --> 0:06:16.680
<v Speaker 1>in Monsters for instance. Uh, you know you have you

0:06:16.720 --> 0:06:20.760
<v Speaker 1>have some great authors like Dan Simons shows up tom

0:06:20.800 --> 0:06:24.200
<v Speaker 1>Noonan shows up writing and directing like a couple of episodes,

0:06:24.600 --> 0:06:29.360
<v Speaker 1>Tony Shalub shows up, Gina Gershaun, Steve U Simmy in

0:06:29.440 --> 0:06:32.679
<v Speaker 1>an excellent pig Monster related episode that I won't spoil

0:06:32.760 --> 0:06:35.719
<v Speaker 1>for anybody. Oh man, we were just talking about pig Monsters. Yeah,

0:06:35.880 --> 0:06:38.279
<v Speaker 1>and this is a great pig Monster episode. I gotta

0:06:38.360 --> 0:06:40.560
<v Speaker 1>dive in. But yeah, this show is kind of a

0:06:40.560 --> 0:06:43.400
<v Speaker 1>spiritual successor to Tails from the Dark Side, which one

0:06:44.120 --> 0:06:46.080
<v Speaker 1>eighty eight, which I did see a lot of and

0:06:46.160 --> 0:06:49.720
<v Speaker 1>was traumatized to times by as a child. Uh. And

0:06:49.960 --> 0:06:52.760
<v Speaker 1>the Monsters featured many of the same people, and again

0:06:52.839 --> 0:06:55.880
<v Speaker 1>an incredible opening sequence, like a lot of these anthologies

0:06:56.080 --> 0:06:59.880
<v Speaker 1>shows had, in which a humorous family of monsters settled

0:06:59.880 --> 0:07:03.120
<v Speaker 1>in to watch TV together, I believe, right before they

0:07:03.160 --> 0:07:06.039
<v Speaker 1>start watching their show, the mother monster shows up with

0:07:06.080 --> 0:07:09.000
<v Speaker 1>a dish full of something she's been cooking, and the

0:07:09.120 --> 0:07:15.480
<v Speaker 1>child monster declares, candied critters, Yeah, it's it's cheesy, it's great. Uh,

0:07:15.520 --> 0:07:17.880
<v Speaker 1>and then it and then you proceed into some new

0:07:17.960 --> 0:07:21.000
<v Speaker 1>story that's going to center around a monster. And usually

0:07:21.040 --> 0:07:24.640
<v Speaker 1>that's like really cool practical effects too. So these episodes

0:07:25.440 --> 0:07:28.120
<v Speaker 1>it can be a little hokey intentionally, so at times

0:07:28.200 --> 0:07:30.360
<v Speaker 1>that the music is a little weird, this kind of

0:07:31.040 --> 0:07:34.640
<v Speaker 1>sense music that I even have trouble loving at times,

0:07:34.760 --> 0:07:37.880
<v Speaker 1>like synthetic saxophone music. You've got a very open heart

0:07:37.920 --> 0:07:42.240
<v Speaker 1>for synth. Yeah, but great cast, cool monster and Uh.

0:07:42.320 --> 0:07:44.400
<v Speaker 1>The episode I'm going to talk about today is one

0:07:44.440 --> 0:07:47.960
<v Speaker 1>titled Far Below. And the reason I was so excited

0:07:48.000 --> 0:07:50.400
<v Speaker 1>I didn't even know they'd covered this, but Far Below

0:07:51.080 --> 0:07:56.080
<v Speaker 1>is one of my favorite short stories by Robert Barbour Johnson,

0:07:56.120 --> 0:07:59.920
<v Speaker 1>who lived nineteen o seven through seven. Uh, this is

0:08:00.160 --> 0:08:02.760
<v Speaker 1>like a Weird Tales era story that I read years

0:08:02.760 --> 0:08:05.240
<v Speaker 1>and years ago, and I've just I've lived my entire

0:08:05.280 --> 0:08:08.520
<v Speaker 1>life up until like this week, having no idea that

0:08:08.560 --> 0:08:11.840
<v Speaker 1>anybody had ever adapted it. So so I was instantly

0:08:11.880 --> 0:08:13.920
<v Speaker 1>excited and I and I said, all right, I've got

0:08:13.920 --> 0:08:16.920
<v Speaker 1>to cover this. So it takes place in the deepest

0:08:16.960 --> 0:08:19.680
<v Speaker 1>depths of the New York subway system, one of my

0:08:19.720 --> 0:08:22.640
<v Speaker 1>favorite places anyway, and you have a you have a

0:08:22.640 --> 0:08:26.000
<v Speaker 1>special segment of city services that wage an endless campaign

0:08:26.000 --> 0:08:29.280
<v Speaker 1>against the ghouls that burrow up from the depths. It's

0:08:29.320 --> 0:08:32.120
<v Speaker 1>a it's a haunting tale. The positions them as workers

0:08:32.120 --> 0:08:35.240
<v Speaker 1>in a dark and human place against an inhuman enemy,

0:08:35.320 --> 0:08:37.080
<v Speaker 1>and they all are on the risk of losing their

0:08:37.080 --> 0:08:41.400
<v Speaker 1>own humanity in the process. So this season two adaptation

0:08:41.679 --> 0:08:43.880
<v Speaker 1>of Far Below has a lot going for it. So

0:08:43.920 --> 0:08:46.120
<v Speaker 1>not only do you have Johnson's short story as the

0:08:46.240 --> 0:08:48.840
<v Speaker 1>you know, the the inspiration for it. It was adapted

0:08:48.840 --> 0:08:52.360
<v Speaker 1>for the screen by Michael McDowell, the screenwriter who gave

0:08:52.400 --> 0:08:56.320
<v Speaker 1>us Beetlejuice, The Nightmare Before Christmas, and perhaps to a

0:08:56.360 --> 0:08:59.520
<v Speaker 1>lesser extent, Thinner. Two out of three ain't bad. Yeah.

0:08:59.679 --> 0:09:03.560
<v Speaker 1>Plus it's directed by the legendary producer Deborah Hill, whoa

0:09:03.920 --> 0:09:06.680
<v Speaker 1>Deborah Hill of like John Carpenter movie fame. Yeah Yeah,

0:09:06.720 --> 0:09:10.360
<v Speaker 1>longtime collab collaborator and producer of John Carpenter's films such

0:09:10.400 --> 0:09:13.679
<v Speaker 1>as Halloween, Halloween to the Fog, Halloween three, Season of

0:09:13.720 --> 0:09:17.160
<v Speaker 1>the Witch, Yes, Escape from New York, Escape from l A.

0:09:17.520 --> 0:09:20.640
<v Speaker 1>She also produced Clue, The Dead Zone, The Fisher King,

0:09:20.960 --> 0:09:24.439
<v Speaker 1>and Big Top Peeweek. So, but this was one of

0:09:24.480 --> 0:09:28.200
<v Speaker 1>the only two things she ever directed. So I was instantly,

0:09:28.240 --> 0:09:31.600
<v Speaker 1>you know, intrigued. And then the cast is small but

0:09:31.679 --> 0:09:35.079
<v Speaker 1>pretty fun. In that veteran actor Barry Nelson places his

0:09:35.200 --> 0:09:39.840
<v Speaker 1>character Dr. Vernon Rathmore Barry Nelson was he in Planet

0:09:39.880 --> 0:09:43.360
<v Speaker 1>of the Vampires? Oh, he might have been. Maybe you

0:09:43.400 --> 0:09:45.360
<v Speaker 1>can do a quick look up on that while I

0:09:45.640 --> 0:09:48.080
<v Speaker 1>cover some of other things he was in. Uh, you know,

0:09:48.120 --> 0:09:50.559
<v Speaker 1>he's one of these character actress that was in everything.

0:09:50.600 --> 0:09:53.160
<v Speaker 1>A lot of TV work back in the day. A

0:09:53.200 --> 0:09:56.520
<v Speaker 1>few classic horror anthology shows as well, like Twilight Zone,

0:09:56.600 --> 0:09:59.920
<v Speaker 1>Suspense and The Alfred Hitchcock hour, but I think most

0:10:00.000 --> 0:10:03.360
<v Speaker 1>people will probably remember him from Stanley Kubrick's The Shining,

0:10:03.679 --> 0:10:07.120
<v Speaker 1>in which he played Ullman opposite Jack Nicholson in the

0:10:07.240 --> 0:10:11.000
<v Speaker 1>job interview scene. That's correct that I was also mistaken

0:10:11.040 --> 0:10:13.560
<v Speaker 1>Planet of the Vampire, says Barry Sullivan. Okay, different bar

0:10:13.600 --> 0:10:15.199
<v Speaker 1>They were like there are a lot of Berriers back

0:10:15.240 --> 0:10:20.160
<v Speaker 1>in the day. Um. So the adaptation itself is pretty fun.

0:10:20.280 --> 0:10:23.040
<v Speaker 1>It introduces a new twist, and they opted to present

0:10:23.200 --> 0:10:25.559
<v Speaker 1>the Ghoules, which are not really referred to as such

0:10:25.600 --> 0:10:28.480
<v Speaker 1>if I remember correctly. They present them much more like

0:10:28.640 --> 0:10:31.720
<v Speaker 1>the more Locks from the nineteen sixty adaptation of HD

0:10:31.840 --> 0:10:34.680
<v Speaker 1>Wells The Time Machine, which I think is a fine choice.

0:10:34.720 --> 0:10:37.840
<v Speaker 1>You know, you need some sort of subterranean humanoid but

0:10:37.960 --> 0:10:40.160
<v Speaker 1>in human creature. If you're not gonna go for like

0:10:40.240 --> 0:10:42.520
<v Speaker 1>what I imagine is the straight up Google or perhaps

0:10:42.559 --> 0:10:45.720
<v Speaker 1>sort of the dog like love crafty and goul, than

0:10:45.880 --> 0:10:49.520
<v Speaker 1>I think a Morelock is a solid choice. Now, I

0:10:49.520 --> 0:10:51.520
<v Speaker 1>want to know more about the the ghouls in the

0:10:51.600 --> 0:10:53.800
<v Speaker 1>story in the in the segment, are I mean, are

0:10:53.840 --> 0:10:57.320
<v Speaker 1>they sort of the grave flesh eating scavengers we we

0:10:57.400 --> 0:11:00.560
<v Speaker 1>know of as gools? Um? Not so, I mean, there's

0:11:00.600 --> 0:11:06.040
<v Speaker 1>clearly an inspiration from Pigman's model the Lovecraft story, in

0:11:06.080 --> 0:11:09.360
<v Speaker 1>which ghoules are bubbling out from the like the underworld,

0:11:09.840 --> 0:11:14.120
<v Speaker 1>um and uh and potentially corrupting mortal minds. Like, clearly

0:11:14.160 --> 0:11:15.480
<v Speaker 1>that was part of the inspiration. That's part of the

0:11:15.520 --> 0:11:18.360
<v Speaker 1>world from which the story emerges. But in in the

0:11:18.360 --> 0:11:20.720
<v Speaker 1>story itself and in the adaptation, it's more like these

0:11:20.720 --> 0:11:23.960
<v Speaker 1>are creatures. They are wandering up from the depths like

0:11:24.040 --> 0:11:27.480
<v Speaker 1>we've It's kind of a tolken Esque idea of if

0:11:27.559 --> 0:11:29.920
<v Speaker 1>we've dug too far into the earth, and now these

0:11:29.960 --> 0:11:32.880
<v Speaker 1>things are coming up, and we have to stop them

0:11:32.920 --> 0:11:36.080
<v Speaker 1>because they're going to continue to pick off subway workers

0:11:36.520 --> 0:11:40.000
<v Speaker 1>and you know, vagrants and then eventually other people, and

0:11:40.000 --> 0:11:42.000
<v Speaker 1>if we don't keep them in check, they will just

0:11:42.160 --> 0:11:44.640
<v Speaker 1>overwhelm us. This is funny. I was just reading The

0:11:44.679 --> 0:11:48.160
<v Speaker 1>Two Towers in the chapter where Gandalf explains what happens after,

0:11:48.400 --> 0:11:50.640
<v Speaker 1>you know, after he plunged down, after the Balaragi says,

0:11:50.640 --> 0:11:53.040
<v Speaker 1>they went into the depths of the earth, far below

0:11:53.040 --> 0:11:55.599
<v Speaker 1>where any you know, the thing that lives above, and

0:11:55.679 --> 0:11:58.040
<v Speaker 1>it is the abode of slimy things and things that

0:11:58.120 --> 0:12:01.319
<v Speaker 1>cannot be named yes, and and indeed these are these

0:12:01.320 --> 0:12:04.680
<v Speaker 1>are some of those nameless things. So on the subject

0:12:04.720 --> 0:12:06.800
<v Speaker 1>of Google's, we of course have an entire episode in

0:12:06.840 --> 0:12:10.040
<v Speaker 1>the Vault about the idea of Google's. We've talked at

0:12:10.160 --> 0:12:12.640
<v Speaker 1>length as well about life underground and the effects of

0:12:12.720 --> 0:12:15.400
<v Speaker 1>human life underground, and so I don't want to retread

0:12:15.440 --> 0:12:17.960
<v Speaker 1>on much of that content. It's it's definitely there and

0:12:18.000 --> 0:12:21.080
<v Speaker 1>we love it. And if you want more subterranean humans

0:12:21.080 --> 0:12:24.160
<v Speaker 1>and Googles, go check those episodes out. But I did

0:12:24.200 --> 0:12:26.480
<v Speaker 1>find a line of the inquiry on this that I

0:12:26.520 --> 0:12:30.880
<v Speaker 1>think is pretty solid. So we have an underground war

0:12:31.040 --> 0:12:35.679
<v Speaker 1>in a great modern metropolis against inhuman enemy that rises

0:12:35.720 --> 0:12:38.920
<v Speaker 1>from the depths, and yet these more lockesque creatures are

0:12:38.960 --> 0:12:41.560
<v Speaker 1>drawn up to feed on humans, the humans that have

0:12:41.720 --> 0:12:45.520
<v Speaker 1>overpopulated this region. They seem to feast on vagrant and

0:12:45.559 --> 0:12:48.200
<v Speaker 1>subway workers, and would feast on far more of the

0:12:48.240 --> 0:12:51.760
<v Speaker 1>populace if not for the efforts of Dr Rathmore and

0:12:51.920 --> 0:12:55.640
<v Speaker 1>his you know, basically, the premises auditors have come to

0:12:55.720 --> 0:12:58.160
<v Speaker 1>check him out because his department is seems to be

0:12:58.200 --> 0:13:02.920
<v Speaker 1>way overfunded, way were armed, and the outsiders asking why

0:13:02.920 --> 0:13:04.240
<v Speaker 1>do you need all these weapons? Why do you need

0:13:04.280 --> 0:13:06.840
<v Speaker 1>all this funding, and and then the story is about

0:13:06.920 --> 0:13:11.000
<v Speaker 1>presenting exactly why this funding is needed. But basically, in

0:13:11.080 --> 0:13:14.360
<v Speaker 1>this fight, uh, the fictional characters are far below have

0:13:14.440 --> 0:13:18.200
<v Speaker 1>much in common with those who battle various organisms that

0:13:18.240 --> 0:13:21.480
<v Speaker 1>we label pests in the real world. And the most

0:13:21.520 --> 0:13:25.199
<v Speaker 1>obvious parallel is the rat, the true citizen of the

0:13:25.200 --> 0:13:27.960
<v Speaker 1>subway tunnels exactly. I mean when you go down there

0:13:28.000 --> 0:13:30.800
<v Speaker 1>to take a train, they're not in your way or

0:13:30.880 --> 0:13:33.400
<v Speaker 1>you know, getting into your stuff. You're in their world.

0:13:33.559 --> 0:13:37.360
<v Speaker 1>You're just a guest. Yeah. Now, to be sure, a

0:13:37.400 --> 0:13:39.760
<v Speaker 1>single rat can be a problem even in a you know,

0:13:39.760 --> 0:13:43.160
<v Speaker 1>a sort of a prehistoric, precity sense of human existence.

0:13:43.679 --> 0:13:46.199
<v Speaker 1>And the same can be said of same mosquitoes. Uh,

0:13:46.280 --> 0:13:49.200
<v Speaker 1>you know, they both can spread or help spread pathogens. Uh.

0:13:49.240 --> 0:13:50.880
<v Speaker 1>The same can be said of something like the locust.

0:13:51.480 --> 0:13:54.080
<v Speaker 1>But but all these examples of our organisms as well,

0:13:54.080 --> 0:13:56.560
<v Speaker 1>that can become an even greater problem when they are

0:13:56.600 --> 0:14:01.480
<v Speaker 1>imbalanced by human activity. So let's let's think about the

0:14:01.559 --> 0:14:05.120
<v Speaker 1>rat as biologists Ken Appland put it quoted in the

0:14:05.200 --> 0:14:09.040
<v Speaker 1>Case for Leaving City Rats Alone by Becca Cudmore for Nautilus.

0:14:09.520 --> 0:14:15.320
<v Speaker 1>Rats are disruption specialists, so they thrive in disrupted ecosystems,

0:14:15.800 --> 0:14:19.240
<v Speaker 1>they spill into unbalanced realms and carve out a kingdom

0:14:19.280 --> 0:14:22.360
<v Speaker 1>for themselves. And he points out that the very few

0:14:22.440 --> 0:14:25.440
<v Speaker 1>wild animals have done this quite as well as the

0:14:25.560 --> 0:14:29.640
<v Speaker 1>rats in the human world without undergoing domestication. That's an

0:14:29.640 --> 0:14:33.880
<v Speaker 1>interesting point. Yeah, so we we think about organisms that

0:14:33.960 --> 0:14:37.400
<v Speaker 1>can successfully thrive at the edges of human civilization. You've

0:14:37.440 --> 0:14:41.080
<v Speaker 1>you've got two main versions. You've got those that become

0:14:41.200 --> 0:14:44.440
<v Speaker 1>tame and and eventually get bred by humans, like dogs

0:14:44.520 --> 0:14:47.440
<v Speaker 1>or farm animals or even cats, which are a little

0:14:47.440 --> 0:14:51.680
<v Speaker 1>bit wilder versions wilder but still definitely domesticated. Yeah. Then

0:14:51.720 --> 0:14:54.280
<v Speaker 1>you've got the ones that are just sort of destroyed

0:14:54.400 --> 0:14:57.160
<v Speaker 1>by our presence, which are i'd say maybe the majority

0:14:57.640 --> 0:15:00.640
<v Speaker 1>of animals, and like when we change an ecosystem, they suffer.

0:15:00.840 --> 0:15:02.840
<v Speaker 1>And then yeah, you've got this third category, the ones

0:15:02.920 --> 0:15:06.200
<v Speaker 1>we think of as unwelcome survivors in our environments. Yeah,

0:15:06.240 --> 0:15:09.640
<v Speaker 1>because you've disrupted everything. But this is an organism that

0:15:09.760 --> 0:15:12.480
<v Speaker 1>thrives on disruption. They can go right in there and

0:15:12.520 --> 0:15:15.240
<v Speaker 1>find a place for itself. You know, all the rat

0:15:15.560 --> 0:15:19.120
<v Speaker 1>needs is a is a is a place to borrow

0:15:19.440 --> 0:15:22.760
<v Speaker 1>fifty grams of calorie rich or moderately calorie rich food

0:15:23.120 --> 0:15:26.440
<v Speaker 1>per day and some water to drink. Um. And they

0:15:26.480 --> 0:15:28.680
<v Speaker 1>they're going to find that they're going to find an

0:15:28.680 --> 0:15:32.160
<v Speaker 1>abundance of that in our environments. I mean in our garbage,

0:15:32.200 --> 0:15:34.440
<v Speaker 1>in our in our you know, in our refuse, and

0:15:34.560 --> 0:15:38.200
<v Speaker 1>in the in the leavings of our civilization, and for

0:15:38.320 --> 0:15:41.160
<v Speaker 1>all of our domesticated minions, for all of our traps

0:15:41.160 --> 0:15:45.600
<v Speaker 1>and our poisons. Rats still rule cities like New York City.

0:15:46.280 --> 0:15:48.840
<v Speaker 1>In previous episodes, I think we've even talked about rats

0:15:48.920 --> 0:15:52.040
<v Speaker 1>societies in New York City, And yeah, there are sort

0:15:52.040 --> 0:15:56.200
<v Speaker 1>of separate subcultures of rats within the cities that that

0:15:56.280 --> 0:15:59.000
<v Speaker 1>they occupy. Yes, and that's gonna that's indeed gonna become

0:15:59.120 --> 0:16:01.600
<v Speaker 1>very important to or in just a minute. Okay, the

0:16:01.720 --> 0:16:05.440
<v Speaker 1>rat was already perfectly evolved to do all of this. Uh,

0:16:05.480 --> 0:16:08.560
<v Speaker 1>they were stealing from other organisms before us. Most likely,

0:16:09.160 --> 0:16:11.920
<v Speaker 1>we just continue to offer more and more to steal,

0:16:12.080 --> 0:16:16.480
<v Speaker 1>creating waste, disruption and hiding places everywhere we go. And

0:16:16.520 --> 0:16:20.480
<v Speaker 1>of course we went absolutely everywhere, bringing rats in our wake.

0:16:21.480 --> 0:16:26.640
<v Speaker 1>Becca Cudmore's article, however, deals mostly with the Vancouver rat Project,

0:16:26.880 --> 0:16:31.200
<v Speaker 1>which points out that some experts identify the potential dangers

0:16:31.440 --> 0:16:35.120
<v Speaker 1>posed by fighting back against the rat occupation too hard.

0:16:35.600 --> 0:16:37.720
<v Speaker 1>And part of it comes down to this, to the

0:16:37.800 --> 0:16:43.400
<v Speaker 1>disruption of these stable rat colonies. Uh, these these stable areas,

0:16:43.480 --> 0:16:47.440
<v Speaker 1>these little little pocket civilizations that the rats have established

0:16:47.680 --> 0:16:51.240
<v Speaker 1>in these disrupted ecosystems. These are some of the key

0:16:51.280 --> 0:16:54.240
<v Speaker 1>points that have been made. First of all, drive rats

0:16:54.280 --> 0:16:56.880
<v Speaker 1>out of one home or block and into another home

0:16:56.960 --> 0:16:59.760
<v Speaker 1>or block, and you might be spreading rat pathogens that

0:17:00.080 --> 0:17:05.080
<v Speaker 1>otherwise be quarantined within this stable group. Oh yeah. Plus,

0:17:05.240 --> 0:17:08.080
<v Speaker 1>urban rats have a garbage based diet, meaning that they

0:17:08.080 --> 0:17:11.119
<v Speaker 1>absorb a lot of bacteria, and this is often place

0:17:11.440 --> 0:17:14.720
<v Speaker 1>specific bacteria. It's tied to the building, to the people

0:17:14.760 --> 0:17:17.520
<v Speaker 1>that live in that particular building. Drive them out and

0:17:17.600 --> 0:17:22.800
<v Speaker 1>you spread these particular bacteria elsewhere. You're stirring the pot, right,

0:17:23.359 --> 0:17:26.119
<v Speaker 1>and then rats in one area will wage bloody war

0:17:26.200 --> 0:17:29.399
<v Speaker 1>against any stranger rat that arrives. This applies to New

0:17:29.480 --> 0:17:31.719
<v Speaker 1>York City as well, where I've read and I think

0:17:31.760 --> 0:17:34.040
<v Speaker 1>we've talked about this before about how a native rat

0:17:34.080 --> 0:17:36.960
<v Speaker 1>population tends to do a decent job of fighting off

0:17:37.080 --> 0:17:40.280
<v Speaker 1>rat invasions that come in on ships, etcetera. Um, And

0:17:40.400 --> 0:17:43.119
<v Speaker 1>so it's a perpetual turf war. But these turf wars,

0:17:43.400 --> 0:17:46.160
<v Speaker 1>especially when you stir them up by fighting back against

0:17:46.160 --> 0:17:50.359
<v Speaker 1>the rats too hard, potentially, uh, those turf war wars

0:17:50.400 --> 0:17:53.679
<v Speaker 1>spill rat blood. They cause rats to urinate out of fear,

0:17:54.280 --> 0:17:56.680
<v Speaker 1>and so what we get is a mix of rat

0:17:56.720 --> 0:18:01.000
<v Speaker 1>blood and rat urine and rat gut contents real which

0:18:01.040 --> 0:18:04.920
<v Speaker 1>is brew. In fact, Kaylee Buyers of the Vancouver Rat

0:18:04.920 --> 0:18:08.840
<v Speaker 1>Project points out that these brawls allow bacteria to converge,

0:18:09.000 --> 0:18:12.399
<v Speaker 1>to mix and potentially create new disease. It's bacteria that

0:18:12.400 --> 0:18:16.760
<v Speaker 1>wouldn't otherwise interact with each other, are pooled together, swap

0:18:16.880 --> 0:18:21.360
<v Speaker 1>genes and form new diseases, such as a methocillin resistant

0:18:21.680 --> 0:18:24.840
<v Speaker 1>staff or m r S. A. Oh wow, I didn't

0:18:24.840 --> 0:18:27.080
<v Speaker 1>even think about that as a consequence of another thing

0:18:27.080 --> 0:18:29.879
<v Speaker 1>we've talked about before, of course, horizontal gene transfer between

0:18:29.920 --> 0:18:33.480
<v Speaker 1>single celled organisms like bacteria. You know, if one acquires

0:18:33.480 --> 0:18:37.520
<v Speaker 1>a useful adaptation and say resisting a certain antibiotic, they

0:18:37.560 --> 0:18:41.560
<v Speaker 1>can share that gene for that adaptation via a sort

0:18:41.600 --> 0:18:45.159
<v Speaker 1>of analogy of bacterial sex. It's not sexual reproduction, but

0:18:45.400 --> 0:18:47.840
<v Speaker 1>they can take part of their genome and just put

0:18:47.880 --> 0:18:51.119
<v Speaker 1>it in another bacterium. Yeah, so we have a situation

0:18:51.160 --> 0:18:54.600
<v Speaker 1>where we disrupted the environment. Organism that thrives and disruption

0:18:54.680 --> 0:18:57.960
<v Speaker 1>is moved in, and then if we attempt to remove

0:18:58.320 --> 0:19:01.280
<v Speaker 1>that organism, we bring more this eruption into the scenario,

0:19:01.640 --> 0:19:05.840
<v Speaker 1>We bring more more chaos. Uh So the idea of

0:19:05.840 --> 0:19:10.280
<v Speaker 1>of fixing these probably becomes more of a hard problem

0:19:11.080 --> 0:19:14.760
<v Speaker 1>of dealing with these rat infestations. Uh So. Anyway, not

0:19:14.760 --> 0:19:16.760
<v Speaker 1>not to say that we shouldn't fight against rats and

0:19:16.840 --> 0:19:19.159
<v Speaker 1>keep them from living too high on the hog, but

0:19:19.600 --> 0:19:22.240
<v Speaker 1>we got here through disruption, so we shouldn't be surprised

0:19:22.280 --> 0:19:26.000
<v Speaker 1>if there are consequences for disrupting it further totally. And

0:19:26.000 --> 0:19:28.080
<v Speaker 1>if you're going to fight a secret war against the ghouls,

0:19:28.200 --> 0:19:31.000
<v Speaker 1>well then perhaps it's worth fighting. Uh you know, at

0:19:31.000 --> 0:19:34.200
<v Speaker 1>a perpetual stalemate, right White turn a cold war into

0:19:34.200 --> 0:19:37.240
<v Speaker 1>a hot war, exactly. All Right, I'm gonna have more

0:19:37.280 --> 0:19:40.240
<v Speaker 1>about the war against rats and potentially ghouls here in

0:19:40.240 --> 0:19:43.120
<v Speaker 1>a second, but first let's talk go an ad break here.

0:19:43.280 --> 0:19:48.919
<v Speaker 1>All right, all right, we're back to city rats the

0:19:49.040 --> 0:19:52.320
<v Speaker 1>ghouls of the real world. Yeah, and comparing it to

0:19:52.440 --> 0:19:56.240
<v Speaker 1>that episode of Monsters far Below based on a beloved

0:19:56.440 --> 0:20:00.880
<v Speaker 1>ghoule short story. Uh. So here's another thing to think

0:20:00.880 --> 0:20:04.639
<v Speaker 1>about here. Uh. We've talked about how rats spread with

0:20:04.760 --> 0:20:09.439
<v Speaker 1>human civilization, and there's such a highly successful organism, and

0:20:09.520 --> 0:20:11.040
<v Speaker 1>yet there are a few areas of the world that

0:20:11.080 --> 0:20:13.919
<v Speaker 1>have remained essentially rat free, the most notable of which

0:20:14.359 --> 0:20:19.280
<v Speaker 1>is the Canadian province of Alberta. Uh. It's virtually free

0:20:19.480 --> 0:20:22.760
<v Speaker 1>of the Norway rat. Uh. Now, while rats do turn

0:20:22.840 --> 0:20:25.440
<v Speaker 1>up from time to time, brought in through traditional means,

0:20:25.480 --> 0:20:27.320
<v Speaker 1>you know, they come in, you know, on a shipment

0:20:27.560 --> 0:20:31.160
<v Speaker 1>or or so forth, but the province has been very

0:20:31.200 --> 0:20:34.800
<v Speaker 1>proactive in squashing these flare ups to hold onto that

0:20:34.880 --> 0:20:38.199
<v Speaker 1>rat free championship that they've that they've earned. You know,

0:20:38.440 --> 0:20:41.040
<v Speaker 1>I have been to Alberta. Actually, I have been to

0:20:41.520 --> 0:20:44.160
<v Speaker 1>the city of Calgary and and driven around in there,

0:20:44.240 --> 0:20:48.200
<v Speaker 1>and I never noticed roving teams of anti rat sorcerers,

0:20:48.400 --> 0:20:52.040
<v Speaker 1>rat exorcists of any kind. And so, so what's the secret? Yeah,

0:20:52.359 --> 0:20:55.000
<v Speaker 1>that's like everybody's next question. How did they get rat free?

0:20:55.040 --> 0:20:56.960
<v Speaker 1>What they do? What can I do to get that

0:20:57.000 --> 0:20:59.840
<v Speaker 1>in my city? Well, basically they were just able to

0:21:00.040 --> 0:21:03.600
<v Speaker 1>heat the rats out before they moved in, which I

0:21:03.640 --> 0:21:05.920
<v Speaker 1>think lines up rather nicely with the story of far

0:21:06.000 --> 0:21:08.439
<v Speaker 1>below the idea of keep the ghouls from boiling up

0:21:08.440 --> 0:21:11.480
<v Speaker 1>into New York City because once they're up, there's no

0:21:11.480 --> 0:21:13.879
<v Speaker 1>getting rid of them. Announce of prevention is worth a

0:21:13.920 --> 0:21:16.960
<v Speaker 1>pound of cure. Yeah. So basically this is how it

0:21:17.000 --> 0:21:20.000
<v Speaker 1>went went down. The Norway rat arrived in North America

0:21:20.040 --> 0:21:24.880
<v Speaker 1>and roughly seventeen seventy five keyports cities never had a chance.

0:21:25.560 --> 0:21:29.199
<v Speaker 1>But from there they gradually spread across the continent, and

0:21:29.240 --> 0:21:32.760
<v Speaker 1>that took time for certain areas. The rats didn't enter

0:21:32.800 --> 0:21:36.560
<v Speaker 1>eastern Saskatchewan until the nineteen twenties, and according to Alberta's

0:21:36.600 --> 0:21:39.800
<v Speaker 1>official website on their history of rat control, the rats

0:21:39.840 --> 0:21:42.520
<v Speaker 1>continue to spread northwest at a rate of fifteen miles

0:21:42.600 --> 0:21:45.800
<v Speaker 1>or twenty four kilometers per year. So they first reached

0:21:45.800 --> 0:21:50.480
<v Speaker 1>the eastern border of Alberta in nineteen fifty and that's

0:21:50.520 --> 0:21:53.159
<v Speaker 1>where they stopped them with rat control measures, keeping the

0:21:53.200 --> 0:21:56.720
<v Speaker 1>province and its cities free of the furry invaders. And

0:21:56.880 --> 0:22:00.000
<v Speaker 1>uh and that also includes its largest city, Calgary. Basically,

0:22:00.040 --> 0:22:03.040
<v Speaker 1>they realized the threat to all levels of human activities,

0:22:03.119 --> 0:22:05.480
<v Speaker 1>especially agriculture, you know, which there was a lot of,

0:22:05.960 --> 0:22:08.400
<v Speaker 1>which is why the Department of Agriculture did a lot

0:22:08.440 --> 0:22:12.359
<v Speaker 1>of the heavy lifting, especially early on, but legislation also

0:22:12.480 --> 0:22:16.080
<v Speaker 1>mandated control of tests by quote every person and every

0:22:16.200 --> 0:22:21.040
<v Speaker 1>level of government like county clerks or yeah, well, I mean,

0:22:21.840 --> 0:22:24.399
<v Speaker 1>I mean essentially, like they basically they've spread the message

0:22:24.400 --> 0:22:27.359
<v Speaker 1>to absolutely everyone, and then every municipality had to have

0:22:27.400 --> 0:22:31.520
<v Speaker 1>a pest control inspector. A control zone was established. And

0:22:31.520 --> 0:22:34.200
<v Speaker 1>and this is good far below hinges in part in

0:22:34.240 --> 0:22:38.159
<v Speaker 1>the idea that a bureaucratic outsider, uh, you know, like

0:22:38.240 --> 0:22:40.919
<v Speaker 1>most of the world has no idea about the Google threat.

0:22:41.160 --> 0:22:44.320
<v Speaker 1>The whole tale is his education into the reality of

0:22:44.359 --> 0:22:48.960
<v Speaker 1>the struggle against the ghouls. And Alberta's efforts actually mirrored

0:22:48.960 --> 0:22:51.760
<v Speaker 1>this in some to some degree. They had to. They

0:22:51.800 --> 0:22:55.520
<v Speaker 1>sought to enlist the population against the rap threat, you know,

0:22:55.560 --> 0:22:58.720
<v Speaker 1>to build up, you know, the public awareness. So they

0:22:58.720 --> 0:23:01.639
<v Speaker 1>had to educate the pub like about rats. Most people

0:23:01.640 --> 0:23:04.720
<v Speaker 1>in Alberta had never seen a rat before. It's hard

0:23:04.720 --> 0:23:09.600
<v Speaker 1>to imagine. Yeah, so Alberta's so Alberta agriculture educators traveled

0:23:09.600 --> 0:23:14.080
<v Speaker 1>around with preserved rats specimens to inform the public. There's

0:23:14.119 --> 0:23:19.679
<v Speaker 1>a fabulous photocolored photographs that the Alberta's website includes of

0:23:19.760 --> 0:23:23.320
<v Speaker 1>these educators on a farm in Alberta with a bunch

0:23:23.320 --> 0:23:26.480
<v Speaker 1>of preserved rats, not in a container, just laid out

0:23:26.760 --> 0:23:29.359
<v Speaker 1>on the grass. There's a child holding one up by

0:23:29.400 --> 0:23:31.760
<v Speaker 1>the tail, and they're just saying, like, these are rats.

0:23:31.880 --> 0:23:33.480
<v Speaker 1>This is why you need to be vigilant about. This

0:23:33.520 --> 0:23:34.919
<v Speaker 1>is what you need to look out for. It's like

0:23:34.960 --> 0:23:39.280
<v Speaker 1>teaching New Zealanders about squirrels. Yeah, I guess so, um,

0:23:39.320 --> 0:23:41.840
<v Speaker 1>and I mean, what better way than the physical thing itself.

0:23:42.080 --> 0:23:44.480
<v Speaker 1>But on top of that, there were conferences, there were posters,

0:23:44.480 --> 0:23:46.840
<v Speaker 1>there were pamphlets, you know, some of these like straight

0:23:46.920 --> 0:23:51.159
<v Speaker 1>up propaganda posters about the terror of the rat. They

0:23:51.200 --> 0:23:54.159
<v Speaker 1>advocated the use of poisons to fight back, though they

0:23:54.160 --> 0:23:56.639
<v Speaker 1>also had to bring in outside experts to help them,

0:23:56.680 --> 0:24:00.280
<v Speaker 1>because again, most Alberta residents had no experience with cats,

0:24:00.520 --> 0:24:03.760
<v Speaker 1>and that includes experience fighting them. Uh So they were

0:24:03.760 --> 0:24:06.320
<v Speaker 1>able to battle the rat infestations along the eastern border

0:24:06.359 --> 0:24:09.399
<v Speaker 1>and keep them mostly within ten to twenty kilometers of

0:24:09.440 --> 0:24:12.800
<v Speaker 1>the border, and the program continues today in an altered

0:24:12.840 --> 0:24:15.639
<v Speaker 1>but still effective form. It's actually illegal to own a

0:24:15.680 --> 0:24:19.080
<v Speaker 1>pet rat in the province. You've got to be a zoo,

0:24:19.160 --> 0:24:23.360
<v Speaker 1>a university, or a recognized research institution. Uh there's also

0:24:23.440 --> 0:24:27.400
<v Speaker 1>a rat hotline where you report rat and flare ups

0:24:27.400 --> 0:24:29.760
<v Speaker 1>in case, you know they when they do occur. But

0:24:29.840 --> 0:24:32.600
<v Speaker 1>one of the problems is that, again most Alberta residents

0:24:32.760 --> 0:24:36.119
<v Speaker 1>don't have a good eye for rats. Hello, and extremely

0:24:36.160 --> 0:24:39.800
<v Speaker 1>tiny dog just ran across my kitchen floor. Well, what

0:24:39.840 --> 0:24:43.240
<v Speaker 1>happens if they end up reporting muskrats, gophers, ground squirrels

0:24:43.240 --> 0:24:46.280
<v Speaker 1>and other similar organisms and then you know, the rat

0:24:46.320 --> 0:24:48.160
<v Speaker 1>police come out to check and they're like, oh, those

0:24:48.200 --> 0:24:50.399
<v Speaker 1>are not rats, those are muskrats. Uh, you know, we

0:24:50.400 --> 0:24:54.200
<v Speaker 1>can't really do anything about that. Uh. By the way,

0:24:54.400 --> 0:24:58.040
<v Speaker 1>to come back to monsters, the anthology series If if

0:24:58.040 --> 0:25:00.760
<v Speaker 1>you're wondering if there is an episod out of monsters

0:25:00.760 --> 0:25:05.440
<v Speaker 1>that expressly concerns rats, there is. There's one called Stressed Environment,

0:25:05.720 --> 0:25:08.679
<v Speaker 1>in which a female scientist who spent twelve years raising

0:25:08.760 --> 0:25:11.320
<v Speaker 1>rats in a stressed environment, uh, you know, in the

0:25:11.359 --> 0:25:15.560
<v Speaker 1>hopes of evolving their intelligence, faces to the terrifying results

0:25:15.560 --> 0:25:18.840
<v Speaker 1>of your experiment. It stars Carol Linley, and it has

0:25:18.840 --> 0:25:21.680
<v Speaker 1>stop motion rats that end up using spears against their

0:25:21.720 --> 0:25:25.960
<v Speaker 1>human captors. Smart rats. Indeed, so this whole thing from

0:25:25.960 --> 0:25:30.120
<v Speaker 1>far below about this team of bureaucratic professionals who work

0:25:30.200 --> 0:25:33.320
<v Speaker 1>for the city who have to go underground to fight

0:25:33.560 --> 0:25:36.320
<v Speaker 1>the uh, the menace coming up from below. Of course,

0:25:36.320 --> 0:25:39.120
<v Speaker 1>in the story it's ghouls. You've got the analogy to rats,

0:25:39.160 --> 0:25:41.320
<v Speaker 1>but I can't help but think of the fat bergs.

0:25:42.000 --> 0:25:44.840
<v Speaker 1>The people up above are completely oblivious to the fact

0:25:44.920 --> 0:25:48.520
<v Speaker 1>that there are workers down beneath the streets, in the tunnels,

0:25:48.520 --> 0:25:52.280
<v Speaker 1>in the darkness, waging battle against a monster that lives

0:25:52.320 --> 0:25:55.640
<v Speaker 1>down there. And of course the agglomerations of fats, oils,

0:25:55.720 --> 0:25:59.919
<v Speaker 1>grease and wet wipes and various fibrous substances that clagge

0:26:00.200 --> 0:26:03.879
<v Speaker 1>kilometers of sewers, especially in places like England and or

0:26:03.960 --> 0:26:06.720
<v Speaker 1>I guess the UK more broadly, but also in US cities.

0:26:07.080 --> 0:26:10.840
<v Speaker 1>It seems like another perfect analogy for the wars being

0:26:10.880 --> 0:26:13.120
<v Speaker 1>waged on our behalf below our feet that we don't

0:26:13.119 --> 0:26:17.000
<v Speaker 1>even think about. Yeah, you create this vast, unnatural underworld,

0:26:17.440 --> 0:26:20.440
<v Speaker 1>and it's going to it it's gonna end up potentially

0:26:20.480 --> 0:26:25.120
<v Speaker 1>being populated by by opportunistic organisms or you know, they're

0:26:25.119 --> 0:26:28.840
<v Speaker 1>gonna be situations where things like fat burgs emerge and

0:26:28.880 --> 0:26:31.000
<v Speaker 1>you need people to go wage war against them. If

0:26:31.000 --> 0:26:32.560
<v Speaker 1>you want to learn more about fat Birgs. We have

0:26:32.560 --> 0:26:34.760
<v Speaker 1>a whole episode about them from earlier this year that

0:26:34.800 --> 0:26:37.639
<v Speaker 1>you can check out. So that was Monsters. Sub Monsters

0:26:37.680 --> 0:26:40.639
<v Speaker 1>I think falls more in the you know, the category

0:26:40.880 --> 0:26:44.200
<v Speaker 1>of fun but often kind of a little bit cheesy

0:26:44.920 --> 0:26:47.480
<v Speaker 1>when it comes to horror anthology shows. But again, some

0:26:47.560 --> 0:26:49.720
<v Speaker 1>of the like one of the big names, one of

0:26:49.760 --> 0:26:52.560
<v Speaker 1>them the classier names in horror anthology is of course

0:26:52.600 --> 0:26:56.320
<v Speaker 1>the classic Twilight Zone, right uh. And so there there's

0:26:56.359 --> 0:26:58.720
<v Speaker 1>so many great episodes of the Twilight Zone that really

0:26:58.760 --> 0:27:03.000
<v Speaker 1>do pose interesting questions that still remain interesting today. I mean,

0:27:03.000 --> 0:27:06.160
<v Speaker 1>there are some that also have kind of hokey premises

0:27:06.200 --> 0:27:08.000
<v Speaker 1>that don't hold up. But I want to talk about

0:27:08.000 --> 0:27:10.679
<v Speaker 1>one that I really think does hold up and is

0:27:10.720 --> 0:27:13.680
<v Speaker 1>still more and more mind blowing the more you think

0:27:13.720 --> 0:27:16.119
<v Speaker 1>about it, and yet at the same time has an

0:27:16.160 --> 0:27:19.840
<v Speaker 1>incredibly simple premise. I feel like this is a great

0:27:19.880 --> 0:27:22.760
<v Speaker 1>example of a story premise getting a lot of bang

0:27:22.800 --> 0:27:24.720
<v Speaker 1>for its buck. And so this is one of my

0:27:24.760 --> 0:27:27.879
<v Speaker 1>favorite episodes of the Twilight Zone. Originally aired in nineteen

0:27:27.960 --> 0:27:31.480
<v Speaker 1>fifty nine, and it's called shadow Play. So in the

0:27:31.520 --> 0:27:33.920
<v Speaker 1>beginning of this episode of The Twilight Zone, a man

0:27:34.080 --> 0:27:38.320
<v Speaker 1>named Adam Grant is awaiting the verdict. After being put

0:27:38.359 --> 0:27:42.080
<v Speaker 1>on trial for murder, the juror's return from deliberation and

0:27:42.119 --> 0:27:45.880
<v Speaker 1>they proclaim him guilty, and then the judge sentences him

0:27:45.920 --> 0:27:49.680
<v Speaker 1>to death by the electric chair. But as he's being sentenced,

0:27:50.200 --> 0:27:54.240
<v Speaker 1>Grant begins to laugh hysterically, and in a fit of

0:27:54.359 --> 0:27:57.800
<v Speaker 1>rage and frustration, he runs around the courtroom yelling at people,

0:27:58.160 --> 0:28:01.200
<v Speaker 1>not again. You can't do it to me again. You'll

0:28:01.240 --> 0:28:05.480
<v Speaker 1>all die. Uh So in his jail cell, Grant starts

0:28:05.520 --> 0:28:08.640
<v Speaker 1>talking with his roommates about how this has all happened

0:28:08.640 --> 0:28:13.040
<v Speaker 1>to him before the trial, the sentencing, the imprisonment, and

0:28:13.080 --> 0:28:16.440
<v Speaker 1>the execution have all happened to him a thousand times,

0:28:16.480 --> 0:28:20.920
<v Speaker 1>but not as reality, always as a nightmare. Grant says,

0:28:21.080 --> 0:28:24.200
<v Speaker 1>he's in a dream right now, and at the moment

0:28:24.240 --> 0:28:27.920
<v Speaker 1>of his electrocution, he's going to wake up screaming back

0:28:27.960 --> 0:28:31.080
<v Speaker 1>in reality. And because it's always been a dream in

0:28:31.080 --> 0:28:33.679
<v Speaker 1>the past, this time it must be a dream too.

0:28:34.000 --> 0:28:37.040
<v Speaker 1>So he tells everybody he can, don't let them send

0:28:37.040 --> 0:28:40.280
<v Speaker 1>me to the chair, because when I die, I'll wake up,

0:28:40.600 --> 0:28:43.400
<v Speaker 1>and when I wake up, you'll all die because I'll

0:28:43.480 --> 0:28:47.040
<v Speaker 1>stop dreaming you. Then there's this newspaper reporter who was

0:28:47.080 --> 0:28:50.240
<v Speaker 1>present at Grant's trial, and he starts to become a

0:28:50.280 --> 0:28:53.920
<v Speaker 1>little worried that he is, in fact, maybe only being

0:28:54.080 --> 0:28:57.840
<v Speaker 1>dreamed by Grant, and if Grant wakes up, he and

0:28:57.880 --> 0:29:01.360
<v Speaker 1>everybody else in the world will see to exist. So

0:29:01.400 --> 0:29:03.240
<v Speaker 1>he gets drunk and he goes to the house of

0:29:03.280 --> 0:29:05.560
<v Speaker 1>his friend, who's the district attorney who was in the

0:29:05.600 --> 0:29:09.479
<v Speaker 1>courtroom also who presented the case against Grant, and the

0:29:09.480 --> 0:29:13.400
<v Speaker 1>newspaper reporter begins to beg the district attorney to stay

0:29:13.440 --> 0:29:16.200
<v Speaker 1>the execution, and the d A of course, thinks this

0:29:16.320 --> 0:29:19.840
<v Speaker 1>is preposterous, obviously, but the more his friend talks to

0:29:19.920 --> 0:29:22.600
<v Speaker 1>him about it, the more doubts begin to creep in,

0:29:22.720 --> 0:29:25.920
<v Speaker 1>however much he tries to resist them. Doesn't the world

0:29:25.960 --> 0:29:30.440
<v Speaker 1>ever feel just not quite real? Isn't it sometimes just

0:29:30.600 --> 0:29:34.880
<v Speaker 1>too perfect or just too full of too many coincidences?

0:29:35.400 --> 0:29:37.880
<v Speaker 1>I think most people can actually identify with having this

0:29:37.960 --> 0:29:41.520
<v Speaker 1>feeling every now and then about their own lives. Yeah, yeah,

0:29:41.520 --> 0:29:45.120
<v Speaker 1>I mean especially we've talked before about some about coincidence,

0:29:45.240 --> 0:29:47.280
<v Speaker 1>you know, and how we would do a whole episode

0:29:47.320 --> 0:29:49.440
<v Speaker 1>to it, I believe, and and how we can over

0:29:49.520 --> 0:29:52.320
<v Speaker 1>interpret that or at least that there's some vast conspiracy

0:29:52.320 --> 0:29:54.040
<v Speaker 1>of foot well. I mean, this is what led like

0:29:54.120 --> 0:29:57.440
<v Speaker 1>Carl Young to believe in this concept of synchronicity, that

0:29:57.520 --> 0:30:00.600
<v Speaker 1>there could be that there was a connecting inciple in

0:30:00.680 --> 0:30:04.720
<v Speaker 1>reality that was not based on physical causation but was

0:30:04.800 --> 0:30:08.680
<v Speaker 1>based on like, based on meaning. Essentially, that events could

0:30:08.720 --> 0:30:12.080
<v Speaker 1>be not caused by one another, but connected to one

0:30:12.120 --> 0:30:14.640
<v Speaker 1>another through meaning. And this is why we have this

0:30:14.960 --> 0:30:18.200
<v Speaker 1>feeling that there are too many coincidences in our lives now.

0:30:18.240 --> 0:30:22.000
<v Speaker 1>But anyway, so after this moment, the District Attorney agrees

0:30:22.040 --> 0:30:24.560
<v Speaker 1>to go speak to Grant in the prison before the

0:30:24.600 --> 0:30:29.480
<v Speaker 1>execution takes place. Grant expects him before he arrives, and

0:30:29.560 --> 0:30:32.720
<v Speaker 1>the d A tries to interrogate Grant on his theory.

0:30:32.720 --> 0:30:34.800
<v Speaker 1>He tries to convince him that it couldn't be true.

0:30:34.840 --> 0:30:37.720
<v Speaker 1>It's not possible that you are dreaming all this and

0:30:37.760 --> 0:30:40.239
<v Speaker 1>we're just in your dream. The d A says, like,

0:30:40.280 --> 0:30:42.800
<v Speaker 1>what you mean to tell me that my family, my friends,

0:30:42.880 --> 0:30:45.400
<v Speaker 1>everybody in this city, in this state, everybody in the

0:30:45.440 --> 0:30:49.320
<v Speaker 1>world is just living inside your dream. And Grant says,

0:30:49.400 --> 0:30:53.280
<v Speaker 1>a dream builds its own world, and the d A asks, well,

0:30:53.360 --> 0:30:55.040
<v Speaker 1>how can I be a part of your dream if

0:30:55.080 --> 0:30:58.960
<v Speaker 1>I sleep and dream myself every night. And then Grant says,

0:30:59.000 --> 0:31:01.360
<v Speaker 1>in this great line, you only sleep and dream because

0:31:01.400 --> 0:31:04.920
<v Speaker 1>I dream you that way. So Grant is then headed

0:31:04.960 --> 0:31:07.440
<v Speaker 1>to the electric chair at midnight, and the d A

0:31:07.600 --> 0:31:10.040
<v Speaker 1>is faced with this choice. Should he call the governor

0:31:10.280 --> 0:31:13.920
<v Speaker 1>to get a stay of execution? But that would be ridiculous,

0:31:13.960 --> 0:31:17.320
<v Speaker 1>wouldn't it? But he has doubts. I'm not going to

0:31:17.400 --> 0:31:20.320
<v Speaker 1>spoil the ending beyond that, but I will say my

0:31:20.480 --> 0:31:23.600
<v Speaker 1>favorite part of this episode, aside from the great performance

0:31:23.640 --> 0:31:26.280
<v Speaker 1>by Dennis Weaver as Adam Grant, is is in the

0:31:26.320 --> 0:31:28.840
<v Speaker 1>middle part of the episode. It's the part where the

0:31:28.920 --> 0:31:31.400
<v Speaker 1>doubts begin to set in for the reporter and the

0:31:31.520 --> 0:31:34.959
<v Speaker 1>d A and the other prisoners on Grant's row. I

0:31:35.000 --> 0:31:39.040
<v Speaker 1>feel like this story at once raises several of the deepest,

0:31:39.160 --> 0:31:43.200
<v Speaker 1>most challenging questions at the core of metaphysics, psychology, and

0:31:43.200 --> 0:31:46.360
<v Speaker 1>the philosophy of mind, questions like how do you know

0:31:46.520 --> 0:31:49.640
<v Speaker 1>for sure that other people in the outside world are real?

0:31:50.200 --> 0:31:53.000
<v Speaker 1>And how do you know your current experience is real

0:31:53.080 --> 0:31:54.960
<v Speaker 1>as opposed to a dream? How do you know you're

0:31:54.960 --> 0:31:58.280
<v Speaker 1>not dreaming right now? And then I think that the

0:31:58.320 --> 0:32:01.080
<v Speaker 1>most mind blowing question from it, of course, is that

0:32:01.120 --> 0:32:02.920
<v Speaker 1>if you're one of these other people in the story,

0:32:02.960 --> 0:32:05.120
<v Speaker 1>like the d a or the reporter, how do you

0:32:05.200 --> 0:32:08.600
<v Speaker 1>know that you're real? Could you, in fact be an

0:32:08.640 --> 0:32:12.680
<v Speaker 1>imaginary person in somebody else's dream. And of course, with

0:32:12.760 --> 0:32:14.920
<v Speaker 1>that last question, you may think the answer is just

0:32:15.000 --> 0:32:18.320
<v Speaker 1>obviously self evidently no. I think it's probably no, but

0:32:18.360 --> 0:32:19.960
<v Speaker 1>it might not be as cut and dry as we

0:32:20.080 --> 0:32:21.960
<v Speaker 1>might hope. I want to come back to that in

0:32:21.960 --> 0:32:25.800
<v Speaker 1>a minute. Yeah, I watched this episode this morning, and yeah,

0:32:25.800 --> 0:32:28.040
<v Speaker 1>it's it's really good. It's it's one of the again,

0:32:28.360 --> 0:32:30.720
<v Speaker 1>a lot of these Twilight Zone episodes, they hold up

0:32:30.760 --> 0:32:33.760
<v Speaker 1>so well, the shot and like stunning black and white. Uh.

0:32:34.360 --> 0:32:36.560
<v Speaker 1>These you know, I guess at times the acting might

0:32:36.640 --> 0:32:38.680
<v Speaker 1>feel a little dated to what you might have today,

0:32:38.680 --> 0:32:41.959
<v Speaker 1>but it's it's all really solid. Also, this episode was

0:32:42.320 --> 0:32:47.040
<v Speaker 1>adapted in the revival of The Twilight Zone, starring Peter

0:32:47.160 --> 0:32:51.680
<v Speaker 1>Coyote Uh in The Elite. Yeah, I haven't either, but

0:32:51.680 --> 0:32:53.640
<v Speaker 1>but I looked it up and I was like, oh, yeah,

0:32:53.640 --> 0:32:56.680
<v Speaker 1>there's Peter Cody. And then of course this episode was

0:32:56.720 --> 0:32:59.400
<v Speaker 1>written by Charles Beaumont, who is one of like the

0:32:59.520 --> 0:33:03.360
<v Speaker 1>legendary names of the Twilight Zone. You have a number

0:33:03.400 --> 0:33:06.920
<v Speaker 1>of killer episodes. Yeah, it's really really good. Uh, it's

0:33:06.960 --> 0:33:11.400
<v Speaker 1>a really tight, well told story. Um, and I highly recommended,

0:33:11.440 --> 0:33:13.040
<v Speaker 1>And in fact, I was just I was watching it

0:33:13.080 --> 0:33:15.680
<v Speaker 1>on Netflix. So the Twilight Zones all on Netflix right now,

0:33:15.720 --> 0:33:17.120
<v Speaker 1>so you can go look it up if you've got

0:33:17.160 --> 0:33:19.560
<v Speaker 1>a subscription, and it's also on Hulu, I believe, if

0:33:19.560 --> 0:33:22.480
<v Speaker 1>anyone wishes to watch them there. But there's tons of

0:33:22.520 --> 0:33:25.080
<v Speaker 1>Twilight Zone awaiting you. I always forget just how many

0:33:25.120 --> 0:33:27.240
<v Speaker 1>episodes of the show they did. I think there's like

0:33:27.320 --> 0:33:30.640
<v Speaker 1>thirty six episodes in the first season, and not all

0:33:30.680 --> 0:33:33.120
<v Speaker 1>of them are great, but a striking number of them

0:33:33.120 --> 0:33:35.720
<v Speaker 1>are great. Yeah. Yeah, Well, maybe we should take a

0:33:35.800 --> 0:33:37.760
<v Speaker 1>quick break and when we come back, we can address

0:33:37.800 --> 0:33:44.840
<v Speaker 1>these questions about dreams and being all right, we awaken

0:33:44.880 --> 0:33:47.200
<v Speaker 1>you from the dream of advertising and back into the

0:33:47.240 --> 0:33:50.160
<v Speaker 1>reality of our episode. All right, So I think we

0:33:50.200 --> 0:33:52.480
<v Speaker 1>should deal with some of the questions I was just

0:33:52.520 --> 0:33:55.719
<v Speaker 1>posing that are raised by this episode of The Twilight Zone. Uh.

0:33:55.760 --> 0:33:57.320
<v Speaker 1>And the first one I think would be the most

0:33:57.320 --> 0:34:00.720
<v Speaker 1>basic question, how do you know that you're entire life

0:34:00.800 --> 0:34:03.080
<v Speaker 1>hasn't been a dream? How do you know that the

0:34:03.120 --> 0:34:06.960
<v Speaker 1>people you interact with aren't just figments of your imagination.

0:34:07.920 --> 0:34:10.399
<v Speaker 1>I think we all assume that other people are real

0:34:10.480 --> 0:34:12.799
<v Speaker 1>and independent, or at least you probably should assume that

0:34:13.360 --> 0:34:16.680
<v Speaker 1>the outside world really exists, will it will continue after

0:34:16.760 --> 0:34:19.000
<v Speaker 1>I die and so forth. But it's harder than you

0:34:19.080 --> 0:34:22.719
<v Speaker 1>might expect to prove this with certainty. Uh though, I

0:34:22.760 --> 0:34:26.400
<v Speaker 1>think almost nobody actually holds this view. If you actually

0:34:26.440 --> 0:34:29.239
<v Speaker 1>were to believe that your mind is the only thing

0:34:29.280 --> 0:34:31.400
<v Speaker 1>that exists, and the rest of the outside world and

0:34:31.440 --> 0:34:34.000
<v Speaker 1>all the people of it, they're just merely products of

0:34:34.040 --> 0:34:36.839
<v Speaker 1>your imagination or your dream or whatever, this is known

0:34:36.880 --> 0:34:39.719
<v Speaker 1>as sollipsism, and to be more specific, I think it

0:34:39.719 --> 0:34:43.560
<v Speaker 1>would be metaphysical solipsism, metaphysical meaning this is how the

0:34:43.600 --> 0:34:47.600
<v Speaker 1>world is, as opposed to something like methodological solipsism, which

0:34:47.600 --> 0:34:50.080
<v Speaker 1>you might say is one of the tools of Saint Descartes,

0:34:50.080 --> 0:34:52.080
<v Speaker 1>who I'll talk about in a minute, which would just

0:34:52.120 --> 0:34:55.360
<v Speaker 1>mean like solipsism might be a useful philosophical tool for

0:34:55.400 --> 0:34:58.160
<v Speaker 1>a moment. And by the way, listeners who are fans

0:34:58.200 --> 0:35:01.279
<v Speaker 1>of the excellence sitcom The Good Play will recognize this

0:35:01.400 --> 0:35:04.200
<v Speaker 1>is one of the philosophies that is currently being explored

0:35:04.239 --> 0:35:07.319
<v Speaker 1>in season three. Oh yeah, yeah, I haven't gotten there yet.

0:35:07.440 --> 0:35:09.560
<v Speaker 1>I think I only did season one. Does it stay good?

0:35:09.920 --> 0:35:12.759
<v Speaker 1>Oh yeah, it it just gets better. They do a

0:35:12.800 --> 0:35:18.560
<v Speaker 1>really good job of mixing it up and defying expectations. Uh. Yeah,

0:35:18.680 --> 0:35:21.640
<v Speaker 1>but I do want to stress I think solipsis um

0:35:21.640 --> 0:35:24.399
<v Speaker 1>is one of those points of view that especially can

0:35:24.400 --> 0:35:26.879
<v Speaker 1>be frustrating to normal people because you can point out

0:35:26.960 --> 0:35:29.320
<v Speaker 1>that it's really hard to disprove, and that can create

0:35:29.320 --> 0:35:32.759
<v Speaker 1>the false impression that, like, some philosophers actually believe this.

0:35:32.840 --> 0:35:36.200
<v Speaker 1>I don't think any philosophers actually believe in solipsism, but

0:35:36.280 --> 0:35:39.280
<v Speaker 1>it's one of those weird edge cases, right that everybody

0:35:39.320 --> 0:35:41.399
<v Speaker 1>just sort of accepts that you have to leap over

0:35:41.480 --> 0:35:44.439
<v Speaker 1>it with an axiomatic assumption. I can't prove it. I'll

0:35:44.480 --> 0:35:47.120
<v Speaker 1>just assume the outside world is real and other people

0:35:47.120 --> 0:35:49.719
<v Speaker 1>are conscious, right, because if you give you if you

0:35:49.760 --> 0:35:52.920
<v Speaker 1>were to believe this, like things get pointless or silly

0:35:53.000 --> 0:35:55.640
<v Speaker 1>or dangerous really quickly. Right. Yeah, of course, I mean

0:35:55.680 --> 0:35:58.759
<v Speaker 1>it's not a disprove But there's a funny implication of

0:35:58.800 --> 0:36:03.600
<v Speaker 1>instability that follows from the assumption of metaphysical solipsis um. Uh.

0:36:03.640 --> 0:36:05.840
<v Speaker 1>And it would go like this, if you're actually a

0:36:05.840 --> 0:36:09.640
<v Speaker 1>metaphysical solipsist. You believe nothing that you experience as real.

0:36:09.760 --> 0:36:12.200
<v Speaker 1>None of the other people actually exist, Uh, they're just

0:36:12.239 --> 0:36:15.080
<v Speaker 1>figments of your imagination or something like that. What would

0:36:15.080 --> 0:36:17.680
<v Speaker 1>be the point of telling anybody about it? Just like

0:36:17.760 --> 0:36:20.680
<v Speaker 1>for your own amusement? Like would any of the imaginary

0:36:20.760 --> 0:36:24.640
<v Speaker 1>people you interact with benefit from you explaining why you

0:36:24.719 --> 0:36:28.120
<v Speaker 1>think that solipsism is true? Now for me, I guess

0:36:28.200 --> 0:36:31.080
<v Speaker 1>the two reasons to tell people come to mind, though,

0:36:31.160 --> 0:36:33.640
<v Speaker 1>though neither is really grounded in the reality of living

0:36:33.640 --> 0:36:36.919
<v Speaker 1>within a dream. On one hand, you know, what better

0:36:36.960 --> 0:36:39.480
<v Speaker 1>way to dismiss the stressors in your life than to

0:36:39.560 --> 0:36:42.360
<v Speaker 1>tell them they're but figments of your imagination, right to

0:36:42.440 --> 0:36:44.759
<v Speaker 1>go to full Scrooge on them. But you'd also have

0:36:44.800 --> 0:36:46.759
<v Speaker 1>to tell that to all the people you like and love,

0:36:47.200 --> 0:36:49.960
<v Speaker 1>and and that though is actually more attractive than one

0:36:50.040 --> 0:36:54.680
<v Speaker 1>might think. I mean, this is essentially an exercise of detachment.

0:36:55.000 --> 0:36:57.960
<v Speaker 1>Buddhist and Hindu teaching speak to the importance of freeing

0:36:57.960 --> 0:37:02.279
<v Speaker 1>ourselves from the chains attachment. Both chains of iron, you know,

0:37:02.400 --> 0:37:05.319
<v Speaker 1>chains to two things that are less desirable, but also

0:37:05.400 --> 0:37:09.560
<v Speaker 1>chains of gold. Uh, change to the things in life

0:37:09.600 --> 0:37:12.520
<v Speaker 1>that we love or or or give us, you know,

0:37:12.760 --> 0:37:15.359
<v Speaker 1>stability and peace. We have to free ourselves from our

0:37:15.360 --> 0:37:19.000
<v Speaker 1>hates and our loves and connect with the true underlying

0:37:19.120 --> 0:37:23.520
<v Speaker 1>reality of Brahmin and uh and and so you know,

0:37:23.560 --> 0:37:25.840
<v Speaker 1>that feels a little on par with what we're talking

0:37:25.880 --> 0:37:28.600
<v Speaker 1>about here. So I think some of the incarnations of

0:37:28.600 --> 0:37:31.880
<v Speaker 1>this philosophy has realized in like Hinduism. I think especially

0:37:32.719 --> 0:37:36.400
<v Speaker 1>I recall them being even more radical than sollipsism, actually

0:37:36.719 --> 0:37:39.319
<v Speaker 1>and saying not only is the not only is all

0:37:39.360 --> 0:37:42.560
<v Speaker 1>of the sense data of the outside world potentially an illusion,

0:37:42.600 --> 0:37:45.520
<v Speaker 1>but also the self is potentially an illusion. So it's

0:37:45.560 --> 0:37:47.720
<v Speaker 1>not it's not that I am the only thing that exists,

0:37:47.719 --> 0:37:51.160
<v Speaker 1>but maybe even I don't exist. Yeah, and I think

0:37:51.160 --> 0:37:53.480
<v Speaker 1>we're going to get into even more of this continue.

0:37:53.760 --> 0:37:56.200
<v Speaker 1>But then again, since almost nobody who thinks about it

0:37:56.200 --> 0:37:58.840
<v Speaker 1>seriously is tempted to believe in sollipsism, I think we

0:37:58.880 --> 0:38:01.839
<v Speaker 1>can just like use the axiomatic pole vault and jump

0:38:01.880 --> 0:38:04.200
<v Speaker 1>over the question. Yeah, I mean, I guess we don't

0:38:04.239 --> 0:38:08.200
<v Speaker 1>even really follow into full blown solop sisum via social media,

0:38:08.440 --> 0:38:12.279
<v Speaker 1>in which we all have, like you know, we have

0:38:13.080 --> 0:38:16.279
<v Speaker 1>a carefully maintained version of ourselves, an unreal version of

0:38:16.320 --> 0:38:19.960
<v Speaker 1>ourselves that interacts with unreal versions of other people, like

0:38:20.000 --> 0:38:22.680
<v Speaker 1>it's just a bunch of masks, and uh, you know,

0:38:22.840 --> 0:38:24.880
<v Speaker 1>I think if anything we're going to lead us to

0:38:24.920 --> 0:38:28.120
<v Speaker 1>like this full blown solipsism, it would be that. Yeah. Well,

0:38:28.160 --> 0:38:30.200
<v Speaker 1>I mean there's there are plenty of ways the word

0:38:30.239 --> 0:38:33.000
<v Speaker 1>salop sisum is used that aren't exactly the same. I mean,

0:38:33.040 --> 0:38:34.799
<v Speaker 1>I think one thing you're getting on there is like

0:38:35.040 --> 0:38:39.000
<v Speaker 1>people often do behave very solipsistic lee on on social media.

0:38:39.040 --> 0:38:41.400
<v Speaker 1>But that's more in the sense of not necessarily not

0:38:41.520 --> 0:38:45.320
<v Speaker 1>believing that other minds exist or that the outside worlds exists,

0:38:45.360 --> 0:38:49.759
<v Speaker 1>but just acting as if you only care about yourselves. True. Yeah, yeah,

0:38:49.760 --> 0:38:51.840
<v Speaker 1>So it's it's beyond that. It's not just I'm the

0:38:51.880 --> 0:38:55.240
<v Speaker 1>only one that matters, or that everybody is that everybody

0:38:55.239 --> 0:38:58.839
<v Speaker 1>else only matters insofar as their attention to me. It's

0:38:58.880 --> 0:39:02.080
<v Speaker 1>that they are not real. They are all figments of

0:39:02.200 --> 0:39:05.319
<v Speaker 1>my mind. They are all but a dream. All right.

0:39:05.320 --> 0:39:07.600
<v Speaker 1>So we're gonna jump over this question. If somebody actually

0:39:07.600 --> 0:39:10.560
<v Speaker 1>holds metaphysical solipsism, I can't disprove them. I'm just gonna

0:39:10.560 --> 0:39:14.040
<v Speaker 1>push them in a ditch. Um, So we go onto

0:39:14.040 --> 0:39:16.720
<v Speaker 1>the next thing. Which is maybe a more vexing problem,

0:39:16.760 --> 0:39:19.719
<v Speaker 1>which is the problem with Cartesian skepticism. How do you

0:39:19.800 --> 0:39:22.840
<v Speaker 1>know that your experience right now, in this very moment

0:39:23.000 --> 0:39:26.160
<v Speaker 1>is real and not a dream? In shadow Play, Grant

0:39:26.239 --> 0:39:29.520
<v Speaker 1>repeatedly explores this question. He's looking for clues in the

0:39:29.520 --> 0:39:33.680
<v Speaker 1>opposite direction, trying to notice details about his environment that

0:39:33.800 --> 0:39:36.640
<v Speaker 1>would tell him he's in a dream. He'll point out, Hey,

0:39:36.680 --> 0:39:39.000
<v Speaker 1>this thing doesn't make sense. That must mean I'm in

0:39:39.040 --> 0:39:41.840
<v Speaker 1>a dream. They wouldn't put that right there. They wouldn't

0:39:41.920 --> 0:39:43.960
<v Speaker 1>let you have this in there. They wouldn't you know,

0:39:44.000 --> 0:39:46.799
<v Speaker 1>this wouldn't be scheduled in this way. Why am I?

0:39:46.880 --> 0:39:49.960
<v Speaker 1>Why am I getting executed the same day I got sentence?

0:39:50.080 --> 0:39:52.600
<v Speaker 1>That doesn't make any sense. I must be in a dream.

0:39:52.880 --> 0:39:55.160
<v Speaker 1>Why are steaks being cooked in the oven? That sort

0:39:55.160 --> 0:39:57.759
<v Speaker 1>of thing. That's a good one. No, I think that's

0:39:57.760 --> 0:40:03.640
<v Speaker 1>just the nine But yeah, nineteen fifties culinary culture in America,

0:40:03.640 --> 0:40:07.680
<v Speaker 1>it might be a largely bad dream. Uh so uh.

0:40:07.920 --> 0:40:11.680
<v Speaker 1>The seventeenth century French philosopher, scientists mathematician Renee des Card,

0:40:11.760 --> 0:40:14.799
<v Speaker 1>of course, was famously concerned with this question in a

0:40:14.800 --> 0:40:17.440
<v Speaker 1>lot of his philosophical works, such as his meditations on

0:40:17.520 --> 0:40:22.680
<v Speaker 1>first philosophy, uh, having doubts about philosophy that gave primacy

0:40:22.760 --> 0:40:25.440
<v Speaker 1>to the evidence of our senses. So like, if I

0:40:25.480 --> 0:40:27.880
<v Speaker 1>assume is a starting point that I'm sitting in a

0:40:27.960 --> 0:40:31.440
<v Speaker 1>chair in a studio talking into a microphone, I could

0:40:31.480 --> 0:40:34.680
<v Speaker 1>turn out to be completely wrong, because I already know.

0:40:34.840 --> 0:40:37.719
<v Speaker 1>There have been thousands of times in my life when

0:40:37.719 --> 0:40:40.720
<v Speaker 1>I was a hundred percent convinced that I was really

0:40:40.920 --> 0:40:45.560
<v Speaker 1>physically in my elementary school lunchline next to Foghorn Leghorn,

0:40:46.000 --> 0:40:49.080
<v Speaker 1>or on a boat headed to Greenland wearing a I

0:40:49.120 --> 0:40:51.480
<v Speaker 1>don't know, a Superman cape or something, only to wake

0:40:51.560 --> 0:40:53.840
<v Speaker 1>up and realize that I was actually asleep in my

0:40:53.880 --> 0:40:57.839
<v Speaker 1>bed dreaming. And I was totally convinced in the moment. Yeah,

0:40:57.840 --> 0:41:00.839
<v Speaker 1>I mean, granted, it's it's it's west version of us

0:41:00.840 --> 0:41:03.000
<v Speaker 1>to a certain extent, Like we there are things that

0:41:03.120 --> 0:41:05.279
<v Speaker 1>we're not picking up on that we would otherwise pick

0:41:05.400 --> 0:41:07.319
<v Speaker 1>up on a lot of the times, but within the

0:41:07.320 --> 0:41:10.399
<v Speaker 1>context of the dream, we buy it as our reality. Well, yeah,

0:41:10.600 --> 0:41:12.600
<v Speaker 1>that's one of the things. So you say that, and

0:41:12.640 --> 0:41:17.560
<v Speaker 1>I agree with you. There is a textural difference to dreams. Dreams,

0:41:18.120 --> 0:41:21.480
<v Speaker 1>you know, are waking reality. Doesn't feel like a dream, right.

0:41:21.800 --> 0:41:26.320
<v Speaker 1>Dreams are hazy and ethereal and and absurd in ways

0:41:26.360 --> 0:41:28.960
<v Speaker 1>that we don't notice in the moment. And my surroundings

0:41:29.040 --> 0:41:31.520
<v Speaker 1>right now feel very lucid and solid, right, And it

0:41:31.520 --> 0:41:35.120
<v Speaker 1>feels like there's a qualitative difference, right, of course, until

0:41:35.160 --> 0:41:37.200
<v Speaker 1>we start really looking at how we observe the world

0:41:37.360 --> 0:41:41.440
<v Speaker 1>right exactly, Yes, there does seem to be a qualitative difference,

0:41:41.680 --> 0:41:46.440
<v Speaker 1>But maybe dreams only seem hazy and ethereal in comparison

0:41:46.800 --> 0:41:51.280
<v Speaker 1>in retrospect, because in the moment, doesn't a dream often

0:41:51.320 --> 0:41:55.160
<v Speaker 1>feel exactly as solid and lucid as real life. I've

0:41:55.200 --> 0:41:58.759
<v Speaker 1>actually had a number of dreams I recall that almost

0:41:58.920 --> 0:42:01.640
<v Speaker 1>became a lucid dream, and the sequence goes pretty much

0:42:01.640 --> 0:42:04.600
<v Speaker 1>like this. Every time in the dream, I think, wait

0:42:04.640 --> 0:42:07.920
<v Speaker 1>a second, I'm dreaming, aren't I? And then I look

0:42:07.960 --> 0:42:10.520
<v Speaker 1>around and I test my surroundings. Doesn't this seem like

0:42:10.560 --> 0:42:13.120
<v Speaker 1>a dream? Doesn't anything seem out of place? Can I

0:42:13.200 --> 0:42:16.600
<v Speaker 1>fly that kind of thing? And whenever this happens, I conclude,

0:42:16.680 --> 0:42:20.000
<v Speaker 1>oh no, everything around me is normal. I can't fly

0:42:20.480 --> 0:42:23.360
<v Speaker 1>totally real and lucid. This must be real and not

0:42:23.480 --> 0:42:26.239
<v Speaker 1>a dream. I don't know if you've ever had this experience,

0:42:26.680 --> 0:42:29.640
<v Speaker 1>mine is similar. But what happens with me is I'll

0:42:29.680 --> 0:42:31.880
<v Speaker 1>realize it's a dream, and I'll be like this annoying,

0:42:31.880 --> 0:42:34.200
<v Speaker 1>And generally it's an annoying dream. It's something that's it's

0:42:34.239 --> 0:42:36.480
<v Speaker 1>not a full blown nightmare, but it's like it's annoying.

0:42:36.800 --> 0:42:39.200
<v Speaker 1>I realize it's a dream, and then I just fall

0:42:39.280 --> 0:42:41.920
<v Speaker 1>back into it anyway, like like as if it's just

0:42:42.719 --> 0:42:46.000
<v Speaker 1>I don't know that, and that in itself is frustrating.

0:42:46.000 --> 0:42:47.879
<v Speaker 1>It's like, I I woke from the dream, I could

0:42:47.880 --> 0:42:49.600
<v Speaker 1>have why didn't I go lucid at that point? Now?

0:42:49.640 --> 0:42:52.000
<v Speaker 1>Instead I just kind of shrugged and went right back

0:42:52.000 --> 0:42:54.080
<v Speaker 1>into the same old crap. Well, this is one of

0:42:54.080 --> 0:42:57.040
<v Speaker 1>the things that the studies of dreams have found is

0:42:57.080 --> 0:43:02.040
<v Speaker 1>that our critical reasoning abilities are extremely limited in dreams.

0:43:02.480 --> 0:43:06.640
<v Speaker 1>Dreams suppress certain kinds of brain function, especially the types

0:43:06.719 --> 0:43:10.120
<v Speaker 1>of brain function that cause us to question our surroundings

0:43:10.400 --> 0:43:14.480
<v Speaker 1>and think critically about sense data, which of course inherently

0:43:14.520 --> 0:43:18.600
<v Speaker 1>makes us very prone to thinking dreams are reality even

0:43:18.960 --> 0:43:21.040
<v Speaker 1>I don't know. I mean, it's hard to know how

0:43:21.080 --> 0:43:23.680
<v Speaker 1>real they really seem in the moment, except for the

0:43:23.719 --> 0:43:27.080
<v Speaker 1>fact that we feel like they're real right, like well,

0:43:27.120 --> 0:43:29.439
<v Speaker 1>like one bit of sort of folk wisdom is often

0:43:29.440 --> 0:43:31.840
<v Speaker 1>thrown around. It's like, oh, well, letters are backwards and

0:43:31.920 --> 0:43:34.279
<v Speaker 1>dreams you can't read text in dreams or you know,

0:43:34.320 --> 0:43:36.239
<v Speaker 1>something like that. I don't think that's true. I don't

0:43:36.280 --> 0:43:38.480
<v Speaker 1>think so either. But I have had situations where I've

0:43:38.560 --> 0:43:41.360
<v Speaker 1>been reading something in a dream and it's difficult. But

0:43:41.520 --> 0:43:44.240
<v Speaker 1>my experience and then that is like, this is difficult

0:43:44.239 --> 0:43:46.719
<v Speaker 1>to read. I must be dreaming. It's more, this is

0:43:46.760 --> 0:43:49.839
<v Speaker 1>difficult to read. What's wrong? You know? I don't think

0:43:49.840 --> 0:43:53.719
<v Speaker 1>about it about the dream answer being the solution, right.

0:43:53.760 --> 0:43:56.960
<v Speaker 1>And so this whole dream problem is one way of

0:43:56.960 --> 0:44:00.399
<v Speaker 1>getting to the position sometimes known as Cartesian skepticism, named

0:44:00.400 --> 0:44:05.880
<v Speaker 1>after Descartes, and also affecting our our mail about Carnie Uh.

0:44:06.200 --> 0:44:09.680
<v Speaker 1>Since dreams and also hallucinations such as the kind generated

0:44:09.719 --> 0:44:12.880
<v Speaker 1>by a this figure, Decard imagines this evil demon who

0:44:12.960 --> 0:44:15.520
<v Speaker 1>wants to deceive him with false visions of the world.

0:44:15.840 --> 0:44:18.319
<v Speaker 1>Since they demonstrate that it's possible for us to be

0:44:18.400 --> 0:44:22.200
<v Speaker 1>totally convinced of perceptions about the outside world while also

0:44:22.239 --> 0:44:25.480
<v Speaker 1>being ad percent wrong. Descartes thinks, you know, we should

0:44:25.480 --> 0:44:28.360
<v Speaker 1>doubt all of our perceptions unless we justify them in

0:44:28.400 --> 0:44:32.279
<v Speaker 1>a logically airtight way, And of course, descartes ultimate justification

0:44:32.360 --> 0:44:34.719
<v Speaker 1>for the evidence of his of his senses, invokes a

0:44:34.840 --> 0:44:38.280
<v Speaker 1>benevolent God who wouldn't trick him. But is there any

0:44:38.320 --> 0:44:41.280
<v Speaker 1>non theological way to get around this? And he tells

0:44:41.440 --> 0:44:45.120
<v Speaker 1>or tests to separate dreaming life from waking life. There

0:44:45.120 --> 0:44:47.399
<v Speaker 1>have been philosophers who have looked into this and tried

0:44:47.440 --> 0:44:49.760
<v Speaker 1>to come up with here's how you tell the difference.

0:44:50.160 --> 0:44:53.120
<v Speaker 1>The English philosopher John Locke thought he had one. He

0:44:53.160 --> 0:44:56.400
<v Speaker 1>had one that was pain. Right. Blocke said, you can't

0:44:56.440 --> 0:44:59.360
<v Speaker 1>feel pain in a dream like you can in waking life,

0:45:00.080 --> 0:45:02.480
<v Speaker 1>and that's your easy way to tell the difference. Right.

0:45:02.520 --> 0:45:05.880
<v Speaker 1>So maybe if you think you're in a dream, I

0:45:05.920 --> 0:45:07.879
<v Speaker 1>don't know, poke your finger with a needle and see

0:45:07.880 --> 0:45:10.480
<v Speaker 1>if it actually hurts, and if it does, you're awake,

0:45:10.520 --> 0:45:13.160
<v Speaker 1>and if it doesn't, you're in a dream. But twentieth

0:45:13.200 --> 0:45:17.560
<v Speaker 1>century psychology research has found this is not true. This

0:45:17.600 --> 0:45:20.440
<v Speaker 1>is this before we get the whole pinch me situation.

0:45:20.600 --> 0:45:23.320
<v Speaker 1>Oh yeah, I think it may very well be. Yeah, yeah,

0:45:23.360 --> 0:45:25.799
<v Speaker 1>that's interesting. I hadn't thought about that. Yeah, pinch me.

0:45:25.840 --> 0:45:28.600
<v Speaker 1>See if I'm dreaming. I think this would not actually

0:45:28.960 --> 0:45:31.120
<v Speaker 1>due to the research though. I think this would not

0:45:31.200 --> 0:45:33.719
<v Speaker 1>actually be a full proof test, because people do, in

0:45:33.800 --> 0:45:36.600
<v Speaker 1>fact sometimes report the impression that they have felt pain

0:45:36.680 --> 0:45:40.080
<v Speaker 1>in dreams. Just one example is a nine study in

0:45:40.080 --> 0:45:42.840
<v Speaker 1>the journal Sleep by Nielsen at all uh and to

0:45:42.880 --> 0:45:45.600
<v Speaker 1>read a couple of quotes from them, uh quote. Some

0:45:45.640 --> 0:45:48.520
<v Speaker 1>studies indicate that pain is rare and it may be

0:45:48.520 --> 0:45:52.960
<v Speaker 1>beyond the representational capability of dreaming. However, the present study

0:45:53.040 --> 0:45:57.560
<v Speaker 1>describes experiences of dreamed pain that were reported incidentally in

0:45:57.600 --> 0:46:02.279
<v Speaker 1>experiments on the effects of somato since restimulation administered during

0:46:02.400 --> 0:46:05.759
<v Speaker 1>rapid eye movement sleep. The results indicate that although pain

0:46:05.880 --> 0:46:08.600
<v Speaker 1>is rare in dreams, it is nevertheless compatible with the

0:46:08.640 --> 0:46:13.759
<v Speaker 1>representational code of dreaming advantage Freddy Krueger, Right. And this

0:46:13.800 --> 0:46:16.640
<v Speaker 1>actually comes out comes through in shadow play. Right. There's

0:46:16.680 --> 0:46:19.840
<v Speaker 1>a part where uh, where Grant talks about going to

0:46:19.960 --> 0:46:21.880
<v Speaker 1>the electric chair and how he doesn't want to be

0:46:21.920 --> 0:46:24.960
<v Speaker 1>sent there to die again, and somebody's arguing with them.

0:46:25.000 --> 0:46:27.239
<v Speaker 1>They say, if you're just dreaming, you won't feel it,

0:46:27.280 --> 0:46:29.680
<v Speaker 1>but he says, no, Wait, I mean when you dream

0:46:29.760 --> 0:46:33.040
<v Speaker 1>something bad, doesn't it doesn't it terrify you. Doesn't it

0:46:33.120 --> 0:46:35.400
<v Speaker 1>hurt when it happens in the dream? Yeah? I mean

0:46:35.440 --> 0:46:39.320
<v Speaker 1>I'm struggling to think of examples from my own remembered

0:46:39.360 --> 0:46:42.960
<v Speaker 1>dreams in which I experienced physical pain, But but yeah,

0:46:43.000 --> 0:46:45.080
<v Speaker 1>it sounds completely possible. I'd be interested to hear from

0:46:45.080 --> 0:46:47.520
<v Speaker 1>any listeners who have had dreams in which they have

0:46:47.600 --> 0:46:50.440
<v Speaker 1>felt pain. Yeah. They also acknowledged that it might not

0:46:50.480 --> 0:46:52.799
<v Speaker 1>be very common, but it does appear to happen. So

0:46:52.960 --> 0:46:56.640
<v Speaker 1>I think it looks like the scientific research disproved lock here. Now,

0:46:56.640 --> 0:46:58.480
<v Speaker 1>there was another test I came across, and it was

0:46:58.520 --> 0:47:01.960
<v Speaker 1>that the American philosop of for Norman Malcolm wrote a

0:47:01.960 --> 0:47:04.840
<v Speaker 1>couple of influential works about dreaming in the nineteen fifties

0:47:05.320 --> 0:47:07.400
<v Speaker 1>in which he argued that dreams could be put to

0:47:07.440 --> 0:47:11.240
<v Speaker 1>the test of quote a principle of coherence. So the ideas,

0:47:11.320 --> 0:47:15.040
<v Speaker 1>do the events of your present circumstances connect logically with

0:47:15.120 --> 0:47:17.920
<v Speaker 1>the preceding events and the rest of your life? So

0:47:18.080 --> 0:47:21.800
<v Speaker 1>if you are currently having a sword fight with Christoph Lambert,

0:47:22.120 --> 0:47:24.279
<v Speaker 1>why are you having that sword fight? How did you

0:47:24.320 --> 0:47:28.359
<v Speaker 1>get there? Does the sequence of events make sense to you? Uh?

0:47:28.400 --> 0:47:30.359
<v Speaker 1>And this is kind of similar to the test used

0:47:30.360 --> 0:47:32.719
<v Speaker 1>in the movie Inception, when you ask how did I

0:47:32.760 --> 0:47:35.799
<v Speaker 1>get here? Right, the characters do that there to see

0:47:35.800 --> 0:47:38.359
<v Speaker 1>if they're dreaming. If you find you can't recall how

0:47:38.400 --> 0:47:41.200
<v Speaker 1>you got where you are, this allows you to realize

0:47:41.200 --> 0:47:43.920
<v Speaker 1>that the present moment does not connect coherently with the

0:47:43.920 --> 0:47:46.920
<v Speaker 1>rest of your past, and thus you're probably dreaming. But

0:47:46.960 --> 0:47:49.480
<v Speaker 1>then again, I'm not sure this is a full proof test.

0:47:49.520 --> 0:47:51.840
<v Speaker 1>It might be a sort of helpful test, but it

0:47:51.880 --> 0:47:54.040
<v Speaker 1>doesn't get you to the right answer all the time.

0:47:54.440 --> 0:47:56.680
<v Speaker 1>We know that the dreaming mind state, again, as we

0:47:56.680 --> 0:48:00.600
<v Speaker 1>were saying earlier, greatly reduces critical reasoning capacity is and

0:48:00.640 --> 0:48:05.560
<v Speaker 1>it often seems to short circuit logical inquiries with false answers. Right,

0:48:05.880 --> 0:48:08.080
<v Speaker 1>So you might ask a question that would be a

0:48:08.080 --> 0:48:10.960
<v Speaker 1>good question if you could really think it through to

0:48:11.000 --> 0:48:12.920
<v Speaker 1>get to the bottom of whether you're dreaming or not.

0:48:13.000 --> 0:48:15.760
<v Speaker 1>But in your dreaming state, you don't think it through

0:48:15.880 --> 0:48:18.319
<v Speaker 1>very well, right, You don't have full control of your

0:48:18.360 --> 0:48:21.920
<v Speaker 1>critical thinking. So that's a self reflective question like that

0:48:22.000 --> 0:48:23.759
<v Speaker 1>might not be helpful. Right, So, as far as I

0:48:23.800 --> 0:48:26.880
<v Speaker 1>can tell, no one has introduced an airtight test to

0:48:26.920 --> 0:48:30.239
<v Speaker 1>tell the difference between a dream and reality. Waking life

0:48:30.280 --> 0:48:32.759
<v Speaker 1>of course seems real enough. It doesn't feel the way

0:48:32.840 --> 0:48:36.279
<v Speaker 1>dreams feel in retrospect and our memories of them, but

0:48:36.400 --> 0:48:39.480
<v Speaker 1>that still doesn't help us achieve certainty in the moment.

0:48:39.960 --> 0:48:42.080
<v Speaker 1>And then this year gets us to one final thing,

0:48:42.120 --> 0:48:44.640
<v Speaker 1>which I think is the weirdest place we might go

0:48:44.680 --> 0:48:48.120
<v Speaker 1>about dreams. This is the crazy part of shadow play.

0:48:48.160 --> 0:48:51.560
<v Speaker 1>Grant tells people around him that if he's sent to

0:48:51.600 --> 0:48:55.080
<v Speaker 1>the electric chair, he's going to wake up from his nightmare,

0:48:55.400 --> 0:48:59.160
<v Speaker 1>and if he wakes up, everybody in the world will die,

0:48:59.600 --> 0:49:03.800
<v Speaker 1>because this entire world is nothing more than his dream.

0:49:03.840 --> 0:49:06.399
<v Speaker 1>And this is my favorite part of the episode. So

0:49:06.840 --> 0:49:09.759
<v Speaker 1>on one hand, you might think, well, what would it matter.

0:49:09.840 --> 0:49:11.600
<v Speaker 1>You know the people that you imagine in your dream

0:49:11.640 --> 0:49:14.280
<v Speaker 1>are not conscious. Of course, there are many different ways

0:49:14.280 --> 0:49:16.799
<v Speaker 1>to fear death, but one common neurosis here is the

0:49:16.840 --> 0:49:20.040
<v Speaker 1>anxiety of being snuffed out right, of no longer existing,

0:49:20.440 --> 0:49:23.600
<v Speaker 1>of their being a permanent end your conscious experience. And

0:49:23.640 --> 0:49:26.080
<v Speaker 1>if the people in Grants dream are not conscious, there's

0:49:26.120 --> 0:49:28.480
<v Speaker 1>nothing for them to be afraid of, no experience to

0:49:28.560 --> 0:49:30.759
<v Speaker 1>exist in the first place, and thus nothing to come

0:49:30.800 --> 0:49:34.240
<v Speaker 1>to an end. But in the story they do seem afraid.

0:49:34.680 --> 0:49:37.040
<v Speaker 1>The ones who start to doubt their reality. They don't

0:49:37.080 --> 0:49:39.680
<v Speaker 1>want to be snuffed out. And this story seems to

0:49:39.719 --> 0:49:42.520
<v Speaker 1>imply that they actually do have minds that they want

0:49:42.560 --> 0:49:45.279
<v Speaker 1>to live on. They don't want to be blinked out

0:49:45.280 --> 0:49:49.319
<v Speaker 1>of existence by alterations in Grant's brain activity. And this

0:49:49.400 --> 0:49:53.120
<v Speaker 1>is also the only part of the story that's actually fantastical,

0:49:53.200 --> 0:49:56.799
<v Speaker 1>because otherwise the story isn't even fantasy or science fiction, Like,

0:49:56.840 --> 0:49:59.239
<v Speaker 1>it's just perfectly plausible, right that a man has the

0:49:59.280 --> 0:50:02.120
<v Speaker 1>same night or over and over. Uh. And I want

0:50:02.160 --> 0:50:05.040
<v Speaker 1>to take this idea seriously for just a moment, could

0:50:05.120 --> 0:50:08.719
<v Speaker 1>you the conscious entity with a mind, the person you

0:50:08.760 --> 0:50:14.280
<v Speaker 1>are now actually be a person in someone else's dream

0:50:14.280 --> 0:50:17.560
<v Speaker 1>to spare some similarities to the simulation argument that we've

0:50:17.560 --> 0:50:20.080
<v Speaker 1>discussed on the show in the past. Yeah, yeah, the

0:50:20.120 --> 0:50:23.560
<v Speaker 1>idea that that the reality we're experiencing now is a

0:50:23.600 --> 0:50:27.440
<v Speaker 1>simulation created by a far future society that's currently just

0:50:28.080 --> 0:50:32.600
<v Speaker 1>really excited about the idea of the right um that

0:50:32.760 --> 0:50:36.319
<v Speaker 1>we really want to simulate nineteen again. Oh thank god

0:50:36.360 --> 0:50:38.600
<v Speaker 1>for that. Well, look at I mean, look at our

0:50:38.840 --> 0:50:42.600
<v Speaker 1>cycles of nostalgia, right, I mean, look at some of

0:50:42.640 --> 0:50:45.719
<v Speaker 1>our video games simulated worlds that we get into going

0:50:45.760 --> 0:50:47.640
<v Speaker 1>back to you know, like an Old West setting or

0:50:47.680 --> 0:50:52.560
<v Speaker 1>a hard boiled detective world or the nineteen eighties, etcetera.

0:50:52.600 --> 0:50:56.000
<v Speaker 1>So it's it's not impossible. But but just as Grant

0:50:56.120 --> 0:50:59.920
<v Speaker 1>argues that the perfection of one's life is an argument

0:51:00.080 --> 0:51:02.719
<v Speaker 1>for simulation, like this is too perfect, it's it's too

0:51:02.760 --> 0:51:05.560
<v Speaker 1>you know, there's something wrong here. I believe there was

0:51:05.560 --> 0:51:07.720
<v Speaker 1>a character in one of I. N. N. Banks culture

0:51:07.760 --> 0:51:10.200
<v Speaker 1>novels who observed that the world is just too full

0:51:10.239 --> 0:51:13.120
<v Speaker 1>of viciousness to be a simulation. That this must be

0:51:13.200 --> 0:51:16.759
<v Speaker 1>the base reality, because who would dream it up otherwise. Now,

0:51:16.760 --> 0:51:19.480
<v Speaker 1>I suppose that's kind of interesting, uh, to to think though,

0:51:19.480 --> 0:51:22.000
<v Speaker 1>that these are the thoughts attributed to a character within

0:51:22.040 --> 0:51:24.759
<v Speaker 1>a fictional sci fi novel. But still I think it's

0:51:24.760 --> 0:51:27.640
<v Speaker 1>an interesting point. Right. But then again, like what kind

0:51:27.640 --> 0:51:29.480
<v Speaker 1>of frame of reference do we have if we have

0:51:29.520 --> 0:51:32.680
<v Speaker 1>no memory or no understanding of the world outside of

0:51:32.680 --> 0:51:36.520
<v Speaker 1>the simulation? Right? But I mean thinking about one way

0:51:36.560 --> 0:51:39.080
<v Speaker 1>to think about the idea of being a simulation in

0:51:39.160 --> 0:51:42.520
<v Speaker 1>a computer program is that you are being dreamed by

0:51:42.560 --> 0:51:47.120
<v Speaker 1>the computer. Uh. Now, one hurdle to the simulation argument

0:51:47.120 --> 0:51:50.680
<v Speaker 1>has always been is it possible for a computer to

0:51:50.800 --> 0:51:54.480
<v Speaker 1>generate and host conscious minds. We don't know. It's impossible.

0:51:54.520 --> 0:51:57.279
<v Speaker 1>It's often assumed to be possible, but we just don't

0:51:57.280 --> 0:52:00.080
<v Speaker 1>really know. The only thing we can be relative of

0:52:00.200 --> 0:52:03.680
<v Speaker 1>least certain works to generate and host consciousness is a brain.

0:52:04.160 --> 0:52:06.680
<v Speaker 1>We know for sure they can do that, because your

0:52:06.760 --> 0:52:09.600
<v Speaker 1>brain is doing it right now, right. But here's where,

0:52:09.640 --> 0:52:12.680
<v Speaker 1>in some respects, the possibility of living in someone else's

0:52:12.680 --> 0:52:16.960
<v Speaker 1>stream becomes more plausible, maybe than living in a computer simulation.

0:52:17.520 --> 0:52:21.360
<v Speaker 1>We know a brain can generate at least one conscious mind.

0:52:22.160 --> 0:52:26.319
<v Speaker 1>Who says it can't generate more than one. There have

0:52:26.360 --> 0:52:29.440
<v Speaker 1>been a number of experiments in fact and observations and

0:52:29.480 --> 0:52:32.719
<v Speaker 1>neuroscience too, especially throughout the twentieth century, that have led

0:52:32.880 --> 0:52:36.120
<v Speaker 1>some experts to believe it might be possible to have

0:52:36.200 --> 0:52:41.080
<v Speaker 1>at least two distinct conscious minds occupying the same brain.

0:52:41.800 --> 0:52:44.520
<v Speaker 1>One big example, of of course, is something we've covered

0:52:44.560 --> 0:52:46.440
<v Speaker 1>on the show in the past. We did I think

0:52:46.440 --> 0:52:48.400
<v Speaker 1>a two part episode about it that you can look up,

0:52:48.560 --> 0:52:52.000
<v Speaker 1>and it's the split brain experiments. These were the originally

0:52:52.040 --> 0:52:55.440
<v Speaker 1>experiments done by Roger's Ferry and Michael Gazaniga in the

0:52:55.480 --> 0:52:58.759
<v Speaker 1>middle of the twentieth century, and they dealt with epilepsy

0:52:58.800 --> 0:53:03.480
<v Speaker 1>patients of people who suffered really intense seizures and no

0:53:03.560 --> 0:53:06.400
<v Speaker 1>other treatment worked, and so the treatment that they eventually

0:53:06.400 --> 0:53:09.800
<v Speaker 1>went in for was known as a total corpus callistotomy,

0:53:10.280 --> 0:53:13.040
<v Speaker 1>a severing of the corpus colossum, which is a bundle

0:53:13.040 --> 0:53:16.560
<v Speaker 1>of nerve fiber that connects the two hemispheres of the brain.

0:53:17.239 --> 0:53:21.200
<v Speaker 1>And the procedure apparently worked pretty well. When you sever

0:53:21.320 --> 0:53:24.759
<v Speaker 1>that the corpus colosum, it does help to stave off

0:53:24.840 --> 0:53:27.799
<v Speaker 1>these these horrible seizures. But there were a lot of

0:53:27.880 --> 0:53:30.719
<v Speaker 1>interesting side effects that made the people who underwent this

0:53:30.800 --> 0:53:35.879
<v Speaker 1>procedure very valuable to neuroscience research. For example, to give

0:53:35.880 --> 0:53:39.800
<v Speaker 1>a very short version, you could show in some experiments

0:53:39.840 --> 0:53:43.880
<v Speaker 1>that the part of the brain that talks, which appears

0:53:43.920 --> 0:53:46.920
<v Speaker 1>to be primarily in most people, the left hemisphere of

0:53:46.960 --> 0:53:51.080
<v Speaker 1>the brain, which is capable of speech, could not explain

0:53:51.719 --> 0:53:55.239
<v Speaker 1>what the right hemisphere was doing. And so if you

0:53:55.320 --> 0:53:59.200
<v Speaker 1>show an image to only the part of the visual

0:53:59.320 --> 0:54:02.040
<v Speaker 1>field that can next to the right hemisphere of the

0:54:02.040 --> 0:54:05.360
<v Speaker 1>brain and controls only one of the hands, the hand

0:54:05.520 --> 0:54:09.799
<v Speaker 1>controlled mostly by that hemisphere of the brain could do

0:54:10.080 --> 0:54:13.560
<v Speaker 1>things like select an object that was associated with the

0:54:13.600 --> 0:54:16.960
<v Speaker 1>image displayed in that part of the visual field. But

0:54:17.120 --> 0:54:20.840
<v Speaker 1>then the person talking against speech is thought to be

0:54:20.880 --> 0:54:24.440
<v Speaker 1>mostly generated by the left hemisphere, couldn't explain in a

0:54:24.520 --> 0:54:28.719
<v Speaker 1>logical way why that object was chosen, and that in

0:54:28.800 --> 0:54:32.840
<v Speaker 1>many experiments like it led some researchers to an obvious question.

0:54:33.440 --> 0:54:37.480
<v Speaker 1>Is it possible that both hemispheres in split brain patients

0:54:37.719 --> 0:54:43.040
<v Speaker 1>are conscious but separately conscious within the same skull In

0:54:43.080 --> 0:54:47.799
<v Speaker 1>some sense, could there be two conscious minds within one brain? Yeah,

0:54:47.880 --> 0:54:50.520
<v Speaker 1>it's one of the This is a total like real

0:54:50.600 --> 0:54:54.279
<v Speaker 1>life Twilight Zone scenario we've we've thought about before on

0:54:54.280 --> 0:54:57.040
<v Speaker 1>the show, Like maybe by virtue of once being one,

0:54:57.719 --> 0:54:59.799
<v Speaker 1>like there's still like each one still thinks they are

0:54:59.880 --> 0:55:03.080
<v Speaker 1>the one, but they are too. Yeah. Well, and another

0:55:03.120 --> 0:55:04.920
<v Speaker 1>thing that would be very creepy is, again because of

0:55:04.960 --> 0:55:09.800
<v Speaker 1>the localization of speech function in the brain, maybe only

0:55:10.000 --> 0:55:13.800
<v Speaker 1>one of these can really talk to the outside world

0:55:13.840 --> 0:55:15.799
<v Speaker 1>and the other one just can't really. It can still

0:55:15.840 --> 0:55:19.719
<v Speaker 1>act with the body, but it can't generate complex sentences

0:55:19.880 --> 0:55:23.000
<v Speaker 1>or anything, which would be an obvious asymmetry in which

0:55:23.040 --> 0:55:25.960
<v Speaker 1>one of the conscious minds within the brain gets represented

0:55:25.960 --> 0:55:28.560
<v Speaker 1>to the outside world. One of them has no mouth

0:55:28.680 --> 0:55:31.520
<v Speaker 1>and cannot scream now. I definitely want to acknowledge that

0:55:31.600 --> 0:55:34.839
<v Speaker 1>I think our picture of this has been somewhat complicated

0:55:34.880 --> 0:55:37.160
<v Speaker 1>by more recent research. I think we do talk about

0:55:37.160 --> 0:55:38.920
<v Speaker 1>the center split brain episodes if you want to go

0:55:39.200 --> 0:55:42.880
<v Speaker 1>revisit those and and see more detail. But our picture

0:55:43.160 --> 0:55:46.160
<v Speaker 1>on how information might or might not be shared between

0:55:46.200 --> 0:55:49.160
<v Speaker 1>brain brain hemispheres, even in the cases of a full

0:55:49.520 --> 0:55:53.200
<v Speaker 1>corpus calisotomy, seems to have been complicated by recent studies.

0:55:53.200 --> 0:55:55.480
<v Speaker 1>I remember there was one we talked about by researcher

0:55:55.560 --> 0:55:58.560
<v Speaker 1>named I think a Ya or Pinto who uh did

0:55:58.640 --> 0:56:01.440
<v Speaker 1>research undercutting the idea that there could be two conscious

0:56:01.480 --> 0:56:04.440
<v Speaker 1>minds within the same brain. Um. I feel like this

0:56:04.480 --> 0:56:06.560
<v Speaker 1>is an issue that that's not fully settled and is

0:56:06.560 --> 0:56:09.360
<v Speaker 1>still full of like weird mysteries that we don't know

0:56:09.400 --> 0:56:12.960
<v Speaker 1>exactly what's going on. Another example from neuroscience case history

0:56:13.640 --> 0:56:16.759
<v Speaker 1>that has been taken as possible evidence that there could

0:56:16.800 --> 0:56:20.240
<v Speaker 1>be multiple conscious minds within the same brain, as the

0:56:20.239 --> 0:56:23.840
<v Speaker 1>the idea of alien hand syndrome, where you know, hands

0:56:23.920 --> 0:56:27.960
<v Speaker 1>may interfere with one another's behaviors as if they're guided

0:56:27.960 --> 0:56:31.560
<v Speaker 1>by different wills. So one hand tries to button up

0:56:31.600 --> 0:56:34.759
<v Speaker 1>a shirt, the other hand, tries to unbutton the shirt. Now,

0:56:34.800 --> 0:56:36.960
<v Speaker 1>I want to stress that there is by no means

0:56:37.040 --> 0:56:40.240
<v Speaker 1>proof or even necessarily strong evidence that there are multiple

0:56:40.280 --> 0:56:43.680
<v Speaker 1>consciousness is within the same brain, because again, you can't

0:56:43.760 --> 0:56:47.080
<v Speaker 1>know for sure that there's consciousness anywhere unless somebody tells

0:56:47.080 --> 0:56:49.480
<v Speaker 1>you that they have consciousness. Right, I mean, that's the

0:56:49.520 --> 0:56:52.319
<v Speaker 1>inherent problem leading back to the solve sism issue to

0:56:52.320 --> 0:56:54.640
<v Speaker 1>begin with. Right. But but again I also have to

0:56:54.640 --> 0:56:56.480
<v Speaker 1>to throw in, you know, we we have to be

0:56:56.520 --> 0:56:59.680
<v Speaker 1>careful about the idea of thinking about like the unity

0:57:00.080 --> 0:57:02.960
<v Speaker 1>of self for the yes, yes, yes, is it? Is it?

0:57:03.680 --> 0:57:05.280
<v Speaker 1>I think the more you look at it, this idea

0:57:05.320 --> 0:57:10.000
<v Speaker 1>that there is one central unchanging you in there is

0:57:10.040 --> 0:57:13.640
<v Speaker 1>a fallacy and one that we we still have a

0:57:13.640 --> 0:57:16.160
<v Speaker 1>lot of trouble with when it seems like the more

0:57:16.680 --> 0:57:20.760
<v Speaker 1>reasonable explanation is that first of all, you're an entity

0:57:20.760 --> 0:57:22.920
<v Speaker 1>of perfessional change, but also there is kind of a

0:57:23.000 --> 0:57:27.040
<v Speaker 1>chorus of of of of yourself in there. Yeah. And

0:57:27.120 --> 0:57:29.880
<v Speaker 1>one interpretation that that brings together a lot of the

0:57:29.920 --> 0:57:34.600
<v Speaker 1>sceneroscience is the interpreter theory and interpretation is the interpreter theory.

0:57:35.000 --> 0:57:38.760
<v Speaker 1>The interpreter theory of Michael Kazaniga, one of the researchers

0:57:38.920 --> 0:57:42.120
<v Speaker 1>involved in in the split brain experiments, where he's got

0:57:42.120 --> 0:57:43.840
<v Speaker 1>this idea that there's sort of a region of your

0:57:43.880 --> 0:57:47.120
<v Speaker 1>brain that's associated with the speech production parts of your

0:57:47.120 --> 0:57:52.320
<v Speaker 1>brain that is there to unify brain phenomena you know,

0:57:52.400 --> 0:57:54.680
<v Speaker 1>that are disparate in the beginning, and it's sort of

0:57:55.120 --> 0:57:58.960
<v Speaker 1>its job is to tell one unified, coherent story to

0:57:59.160 --> 0:58:02.520
<v Speaker 1>you about what's happening throughout your brain. So it takes

0:58:02.560 --> 0:58:05.440
<v Speaker 1>all these disparate plot threads and says, here's how I'll

0:58:05.440 --> 0:58:08.400
<v Speaker 1>finish up the story. Uh, and then and that creates

0:58:08.440 --> 0:58:10.680
<v Speaker 1>the sense of you. Your sense of self is generated

0:58:10.680 --> 0:58:13.520
<v Speaker 1>by this sort of like a concatenation process in the

0:58:13.560 --> 0:58:16.320
<v Speaker 1>interpreter part of the brain. But to come back to

0:58:16.360 --> 0:58:19.200
<v Speaker 1>the idea of multiple consciousness is in the same head

0:58:19.200 --> 0:58:21.560
<v Speaker 1>and maybe the idea of being someone else's dream. I've

0:58:21.600 --> 0:58:24.120
<v Speaker 1>had this idea before. Again, this is not something that

0:58:24.160 --> 0:58:27.040
<v Speaker 1>I would argue is strongly indicated by evidence, just a

0:58:27.120 --> 0:58:30.200
<v Speaker 1>very strange possibility that seems hard to rule out on

0:58:30.240 --> 0:58:33.520
<v Speaker 1>the basis of any evidence I'm aware of. What if

0:58:33.600 --> 0:58:39.000
<v Speaker 1>the process of imagining the workings of other minds involves

0:58:39.040 --> 0:58:44.760
<v Speaker 1>the low resolution simulation of separate conscious minds. What if

0:58:45.000 --> 0:58:47.919
<v Speaker 1>when you're trying to understand somebody else's behavior, you trying

0:58:47.920 --> 0:58:50.320
<v Speaker 1>to understand, you know, why did Jeff say what he said,

0:58:50.840 --> 0:58:53.680
<v Speaker 1>and so you imagine his thought processes, Or when you're

0:58:53.680 --> 0:58:56.840
<v Speaker 1>trying to write dialogue for a fictional character. What if,

0:58:56.880 --> 0:58:59.880
<v Speaker 1>in cases like this you're practicing theory of mind, the

0:59:00.120 --> 0:59:04.800
<v Speaker 1>brain temporarily carves out a bit of its consciousness potential

0:59:05.240 --> 0:59:08.880
<v Speaker 1>to devote to this imagined person in order to better

0:59:08.920 --> 0:59:13.040
<v Speaker 1>simulate their behavior. Interesting, Yeah, yeah, I mean in many

0:59:13.120 --> 0:59:17.040
<v Speaker 1>cases it would, especially if it's a perceived enemy. Right,

0:59:17.080 --> 0:59:19.280
<v Speaker 1>It's probably gonna be a rather simple model. You know,

0:59:19.360 --> 0:59:23.840
<v Speaker 1>it's you're you're reducing them to like, you know, cartoon

0:59:24.000 --> 0:59:27.680
<v Speaker 1>villain levels of of impulse and desire. But I mean

0:59:28.040 --> 0:59:31.000
<v Speaker 1>there's no limiting it just two enemies. I mean, in

0:59:31.400 --> 0:59:34.439
<v Speaker 1>any case, whenever you try to imagine somebody, you don't

0:59:34.440 --> 0:59:38.120
<v Speaker 1>know exactly everything your brain is doing to create that

0:59:38.200 --> 0:59:42.240
<v Speaker 1>simulation of them within you. Right, Like even the people

0:59:42.280 --> 0:59:45.200
<v Speaker 1>we know they the best in our lives. For instance,

0:59:45.200 --> 0:59:48.160
<v Speaker 1>our you know, our our you know, uh, you know

0:59:48.600 --> 0:59:51.920
<v Speaker 1>life partners, you know or you know, loved ones, family members,

0:59:52.080 --> 0:59:56.240
<v Speaker 1>really close friends, we might have a more robust simulation

0:59:56.320 --> 0:59:58.800
<v Speaker 1>of them in our theory VR theory of mind, but

0:59:58.880 --> 1:00:02.440
<v Speaker 1>it is still just a model of how their mind

1:00:02.480 --> 1:00:05.200
<v Speaker 1>works and what they want and how they think. Yeah,

1:00:05.240 --> 1:00:07.560
<v Speaker 1>it's our best guess, it's our I mean, it's not

1:00:07.640 --> 1:00:10.160
<v Speaker 1>their brain, it's our brain trying to do it. And

1:00:10.240 --> 1:00:12.880
<v Speaker 1>if this were the case, you could be, in some

1:00:12.960 --> 1:00:18.640
<v Speaker 1>sense creating separate conscious people in your head whenever you

1:00:18.680 --> 1:00:21.560
<v Speaker 1>try to analyze a friend's behavior, or write a scene

1:00:21.600 --> 1:00:24.520
<v Speaker 1>for a character in a story, or dream about a

1:00:24.560 --> 1:00:27.439
<v Speaker 1>district attorney sitting across from you in a prison cell.

1:00:27.880 --> 1:00:30.720
<v Speaker 1>Now you might say, well, if they're all generated by

1:00:30.840 --> 1:00:33.840
<v Speaker 1>your brain, they're all you. I mean, anatomically, they are

1:00:33.880 --> 1:00:37.440
<v Speaker 1>all you. They're all made by your body. The other

1:00:37.760 --> 1:00:39.640
<v Speaker 1>side of this, too, is like when you read a novel,

1:00:39.800 --> 1:00:42.400
<v Speaker 1>yeah exactly, I mean, in any time you imagine a person.

1:00:42.520 --> 1:00:45.960
<v Speaker 1>I wonder if this is possible, if there's any validity

1:00:46.000 --> 1:00:49.720
<v Speaker 1>to some of these alternative theories of dual consciousness. For example,

1:00:49.760 --> 1:00:53.720
<v Speaker 1>you know, uh, Michael Gazzaniga's left brain interpreter theory. Perhaps

1:00:53.880 --> 1:00:56.720
<v Speaker 1>the part of your brain that talks and interprets and

1:00:56.760 --> 1:01:00.000
<v Speaker 1>seems to be in charge makes meaning of the self

1:00:59.840 --> 1:01:04.000
<v Speaker 1>is not aware that the same brain is also generating

1:01:04.160 --> 1:01:09.720
<v Speaker 1>little conscious simulations of people partitioned from the interpreter and

1:01:09.760 --> 1:01:13.240
<v Speaker 1>the rest of the self. Yeah, yeah, I mean it

1:01:13.280 --> 1:01:15.680
<v Speaker 1>makes me think. For instance, I've read a fair amount

1:01:15.720 --> 1:01:17.680
<v Speaker 1>of Carl Sagan. I love picking up a Carl Sagan

1:01:17.720 --> 1:01:20.880
<v Speaker 1>book and reading it. Uh, you know, it gives me comfort.

1:01:20.920 --> 1:01:23.400
<v Speaker 1>And as as such, I do kind of have like

1:01:23.440 --> 1:01:26.600
<v Speaker 1>a tiny Carl Sagan in my brain, like an idea

1:01:26.760 --> 1:01:29.920
<v Speaker 1>of Sagan that is kind of walking around in there

1:01:30.040 --> 1:01:33.040
<v Speaker 1>or maybe summoned. But the really mind blowing idea is

1:01:33.080 --> 1:01:36.400
<v Speaker 1>what if that little Carl Sagan has an experience? What

1:01:36.480 --> 1:01:39.440
<v Speaker 1>if there's something that it's like to be that simulated

1:01:39.480 --> 1:01:42.160
<v Speaker 1>Carl Sagan. What if he gets into an argument with

1:01:42.200 --> 1:01:44.720
<v Speaker 1>the little Terence McKenna in my head? Right, I mean,

1:01:44.760 --> 1:01:47.240
<v Speaker 1>it's still your brain, it's still all the tissue in

1:01:47.320 --> 1:01:50.080
<v Speaker 1>your head. But what if there's something in there that's

1:01:50.080 --> 1:01:53.440
<v Speaker 1>a little Carl Sagan simulated by your mind sometimes that

1:01:53.520 --> 1:01:57.640
<v Speaker 1>has its own wants, the desires, experiences. Now, again, I

1:01:58.000 --> 1:02:01.000
<v Speaker 1>recognize that this is way out there and aculative territory,

1:02:01.040 --> 1:02:03.520
<v Speaker 1>and I do not claim that there is strong evidence

1:02:03.600 --> 1:02:06.240
<v Speaker 1>for this, but it is one of those strange things

1:02:06.280 --> 1:02:08.680
<v Speaker 1>that I'm trying to think of reasons to rule it out,

1:02:08.920 --> 1:02:12.840
<v Speaker 1>and I can't. Uh So, if this seemingly weird scenario

1:02:12.920 --> 1:02:15.240
<v Speaker 1>were the case, would there be any way to know

1:02:15.400 --> 1:02:20.200
<v Speaker 1>for sure that you weren't a conscious, low resolution simulation

1:02:20.240 --> 1:02:23.880
<v Speaker 1>of a mind inside a brain ruled by the tyrannical

1:02:23.960 --> 1:02:26.120
<v Speaker 1>dictator mind that could blink you in and out of

1:02:26.160 --> 1:02:29.520
<v Speaker 1>existence by the whims of a dream or imagination. Well,

1:02:29.520 --> 1:02:33.040
<v Speaker 1>that sounds like a theological model there. Yeah. Fortunately, again,

1:02:33.080 --> 1:02:35.200
<v Speaker 1>I don't think there's any strong evidence this is the case.

1:02:35.480 --> 1:02:39.520
<v Speaker 1>Sleep tight. All right, Well, there you have it. That

1:02:39.680 --> 1:02:43.160
<v Speaker 1>is uh Anthology of Horror volume two, And if you

1:02:43.240 --> 1:02:45.160
<v Speaker 1>loved it, you don't have to wait an entire year.

1:02:45.200 --> 1:02:47.560
<v Speaker 1>You just have to wait a couple of days for

1:02:47.600 --> 1:02:50.840
<v Speaker 1>the next installment, because we're gonna be back with Anthology

1:02:50.840 --> 1:02:54.200
<v Speaker 1>of Horror Volume three, in which show will look at

1:02:54.280 --> 1:02:57.120
<v Speaker 1>an episode of The Outer Limits and an episode of

1:02:57.160 --> 1:03:01.000
<v Speaker 1>the Simpson's Treehouse of Horror. I can't wait. In the meantime,

1:03:01.000 --> 1:03:02.560
<v Speaker 1>if you want to check out other episodes of Stuff

1:03:02.560 --> 1:03:03.800
<v Speaker 1>to Bow your Mind, heading it over to Stuff to

1:03:03.800 --> 1:03:06.640
<v Speaker 1>Blow your Mind dot com. That's where you will find them.

1:03:06.720 --> 1:03:08.760
<v Speaker 1>And oh see, what else can you do? You can

1:03:08.880 --> 1:03:12.720
<v Speaker 1>find the show wherever you find podcasts, rate, interview, subscribe.

1:03:12.720 --> 1:03:15.080
<v Speaker 1>That's a great way to help check out our other show, Invention.

1:03:15.560 --> 1:03:17.720
<v Speaker 1>Uh it's an Invention pod dot com and is that

1:03:17.800 --> 1:03:20.480
<v Speaker 1>it is available everywhere as well. And if you want

1:03:20.520 --> 1:03:22.560
<v Speaker 1>to interact with other fans of the show, you can

1:03:22.560 --> 1:03:25.080
<v Speaker 1>go to our Facebook group that is the Stuff to

1:03:25.120 --> 1:03:28.200
<v Speaker 1>Blow Your Mind discussion the module Huge Things. As always

1:03:28.240 --> 1:03:32.040
<v Speaker 1>to our excellent audio producer Death Nicholas Johnson. If you

1:03:32.040 --> 1:03:34.200
<v Speaker 1>would like to get in touch with us with feedback

1:03:34.280 --> 1:03:36.760
<v Speaker 1>on this episode or any other, to suggest a topic

1:03:36.840 --> 1:03:38.680
<v Speaker 1>for the future, or just to say hello, you can

1:03:38.720 --> 1:03:41.800
<v Speaker 1>email us at contact at stuff to Blow your Mind

1:03:41.960 --> 1:03:51.240
<v Speaker 1>dot com. Stuff to Blow Your Mind is a production

1:03:51.280 --> 1:03:53.800
<v Speaker 1>of iHeart Radio's How Stuff Works. For more podcasts from

1:03:53.800 --> 1:03:56.600
<v Speaker 1>my heart Radio is at the iHeart Radio app, Apple Podcasts,

1:03:56.720 --> 1:04:07.080
<v Speaker 1>or wherever you listen to your favorite shows. Lit by

1:04:07.120 --> 1:04:13.960
<v Speaker 1>point four point four Foo