WEBVTT - Chuck’s Commentary - Trump Is Setting Up A Midterm DISASTER For Republicans + America Needs To Side With Democracy In Iran

0:00:00.080 --> 0:00:02.360
<v Speaker 1>This episode of the Chuck Todcast is brought to you

0:00:02.400 --> 0:00:06.240
<v Speaker 1>by Wild Grain. Wild Grain is the first bake from

0:00:06.400 --> 0:00:11.280
<v Speaker 1>frozen subscription box for sour dough breads, arteisonal pastries, and

0:00:11.320 --> 0:00:14.800
<v Speaker 1>fresh pastas, plus all the items conveniently baked in twenty

0:00:14.800 --> 0:00:18.759
<v Speaker 1>five minutes or less. Unlike many store brought options, Wild

0:00:18.840 --> 0:00:21.880
<v Speaker 1>Grain uses some simple ingredients you can pronounce and a

0:00:22.040 --> 0:00:25.480
<v Speaker 1>slow fermentation process that can be a lot easier on

0:00:25.520 --> 0:00:28.080
<v Speaker 1>your belly, little gut health there right, and richer in

0:00:28.200 --> 0:00:32.600
<v Speaker 1>nutrients antioxidants. There's also no preservatives and no shortcuts. The

0:00:32.640 --> 0:00:35.800
<v Speaker 1>Wild Grain boxes are fully customizable. In addition to their

0:00:35.880 --> 0:00:38.920
<v Speaker 1>variety box, they have a gluten free box, a vegan box,

0:00:39.200 --> 0:00:42.559
<v Speaker 1>and a new protein box. I will tell you I

0:00:42.600 --> 0:00:44.960
<v Speaker 1>have done the gluten free box. I have done it

0:00:44.960 --> 0:00:48.600
<v Speaker 1>a second time. I have also used the code, the

0:00:48.680 --> 0:00:52.040
<v Speaker 1>todcast code. If you use the promo code toodcast at checkout,

0:00:52.080 --> 0:00:55.640
<v Speaker 1>you get thirty dollars off. I've already used it as

0:00:55.680 --> 0:00:58.880
<v Speaker 1>a gift to somebody else who loves this bread. It

0:00:59.000 --> 0:01:02.560
<v Speaker 1>is hard to find good gluten free bread. It is fantastic.

0:01:02.720 --> 0:01:05.720
<v Speaker 1>They give you step by step instructions. I really dig this.

0:01:06.520 --> 0:01:09.760
<v Speaker 1>There is nothing like having an artesion bakery in your

0:01:09.800 --> 0:01:12.560
<v Speaker 1>freezer to chase away the winter chill. Now is the

0:01:12.560 --> 0:01:15.920
<v Speaker 1>best time to stay in and enjoy some comforting homemade

0:01:15.920 --> 0:01:19.479
<v Speaker 1>meals with Wild Grain. I obviously highly recommend it. It

0:01:19.520 --> 0:01:22.240
<v Speaker 1>is worth giving Wild Grain to try. Right now. Wildgrain

0:01:22.319 --> 0:01:24.919
<v Speaker 1>is offering my listeners thirty dollars off your first box

0:01:25.040 --> 0:01:28.720
<v Speaker 1>plus free croyissants for life. Come on when you go

0:01:28.800 --> 0:01:32.959
<v Speaker 1>to wildgrain dot com slash podcast to start your subscription today.

0:01:33.040 --> 0:01:36.360
<v Speaker 1>That's thirty dollars off your first box and free croissants

0:01:36.360 --> 0:01:39.640
<v Speaker 1>for life when you visit wildgrain dot com slash podcast,

0:01:39.800 --> 0:01:43.640
<v Speaker 1>or simply use the promo code podcast at checkout. This

0:01:43.680 --> 0:01:51.040
<v Speaker 1>is a sponsor I absolutely embrace, so use that code. Well.

0:01:51.200 --> 0:01:55.720
<v Speaker 1>Happy hangover Monday, the day after the super Bowl, and

0:01:55.800 --> 0:01:59.600
<v Speaker 1>don't worry. The NFL is working on the idea of

0:01:59.720 --> 0:02:03.560
<v Speaker 1>another week to the season so that they officially take

0:02:03.600 --> 0:02:07.040
<v Speaker 1>over President's Day weekend for the super Bowl. And you

0:02:07.040 --> 0:02:09.680
<v Speaker 1>can see where it goes. Super Bowl Sunday we get

0:02:09.720 --> 0:02:16.040
<v Speaker 1>President's Day off, because what's more American than that. The

0:02:16.080 --> 0:02:20.399
<v Speaker 1>super Bowl itself, well, it kind of, it kind of went.

0:02:20.520 --> 0:02:23.000
<v Speaker 1>It kind of went. The conventional wisdom I mean, when

0:02:23.040 --> 0:02:26.280
<v Speaker 1>a sort of amateur like me is out there on

0:02:26.360 --> 0:02:28.040
<v Speaker 1>the record saying I think this game's going to be

0:02:28.040 --> 0:02:30.680
<v Speaker 1>like twenty to six. Well, you know, I missed a

0:02:30.680 --> 0:02:32.280
<v Speaker 1>few points here or there, but it kind of went

0:02:32.360 --> 0:02:34.720
<v Speaker 1>exactly how we thought that Seattle would. Just so what

0:02:34.760 --> 0:02:38.079
<v Speaker 1>they've done all year. They kind of grind teams down

0:02:38.639 --> 0:02:41.880
<v Speaker 1>and you're like, oh my god, we can't catch up

0:02:42.080 --> 0:02:46.240
<v Speaker 1>when you're playing them, They're just there is a relentlessness there.

0:02:46.720 --> 0:02:48.720
<v Speaker 1>I'll say this, I got to give credit to the

0:02:48.760 --> 0:02:53.320
<v Speaker 1>Pats defense. They Seattle could have blown this game open

0:02:53.360 --> 0:02:56.920
<v Speaker 1>in the first half, and they made it. You know,

0:02:57.040 --> 0:03:00.320
<v Speaker 1>Darnald missed a couple of throws by that much, a

0:03:00.400 --> 0:03:03.880
<v Speaker 1>couple of great plays by the defensive backfield at Christian Gonzales.

0:03:04.600 --> 0:03:08.799
<v Speaker 1>That was impressive. But at the end of the day, man,

0:03:09.400 --> 0:03:13.320
<v Speaker 1>you cannot The Patriots tried to do something that no

0:03:13.400 --> 0:03:15.280
<v Speaker 1>team had ever done in a Super Bowl. They try

0:03:15.320 --> 0:03:17.280
<v Speaker 1>to win a Super Bowl without a left side of

0:03:17.320 --> 0:03:21.720
<v Speaker 1>their offensive line. I know they were actual physical human beings.

0:03:22.840 --> 0:03:25.399
<v Speaker 1>Perhaps I think they were. I wasn't live at the game,

0:03:25.440 --> 0:03:28.320
<v Speaker 1>but if you told me that was just a green

0:03:28.400 --> 0:03:31.800
<v Speaker 1>screen for their left tackle, because my god, poor Drake

0:03:31.880 --> 0:03:37.040
<v Speaker 1>May I mean running for his life. It is what

0:03:37.080 --> 0:03:41.080
<v Speaker 1>it is. That was the fear going into this game.

0:03:41.160 --> 0:03:43.840
<v Speaker 1>Is that's what we'd expect, but that's what it was.

0:03:43.880 --> 0:03:47.280
<v Speaker 1>But come on, for us football fans are not Patriots fans.

0:03:48.000 --> 0:03:50.040
<v Speaker 1>Did we really want to see them just make it

0:03:50.120 --> 0:03:52.760
<v Speaker 1>this easy to get back and win and winning super bowls?

0:03:52.760 --> 0:03:55.840
<v Speaker 1>That it couldn't be this easy. They should be happy

0:03:55.880 --> 0:03:58.880
<v Speaker 1>they're going to be contenders again when they get an

0:03:58.880 --> 0:04:02.720
<v Speaker 1>offensive line. That's a great defense. It's a well coached team.

0:04:03.240 --> 0:04:04.960
<v Speaker 1>But you got to give your hats off to the

0:04:05.000 --> 0:04:09.600
<v Speaker 1>Seattle defense. Unbelievable. Kenneth Walker was unbelievable. Before those last

0:04:09.600 --> 0:04:13.400
<v Speaker 1>couple of touchdown passes, Kenneth Walker was looking like the

0:04:13.520 --> 0:04:17.760
<v Speaker 1>MVP in that front. But look, Sam Donald, he made

0:04:17.760 --> 0:04:20.320
<v Speaker 1>a few throws that you're like, you know, when you're

0:04:20.360 --> 0:04:23.599
<v Speaker 1>a Sam Donald fan, I didn't. I imagine there's a

0:04:23.640 --> 0:04:26.880
<v Speaker 1>lot of no, no, no, no, no yes when it comes

0:04:26.880 --> 0:04:30.840
<v Speaker 1>to Donald, but there it is. Kudos to the Seahawks,

0:04:32.839 --> 0:04:36.560
<v Speaker 1>it was. This is one of those years where it

0:04:36.640 --> 0:04:39.320
<v Speaker 1>felt like the NFC was just that much better and

0:04:39.360 --> 0:04:44.440
<v Speaker 1>the Super Bowl produced kind of exactly how the season went.

0:04:45.000 --> 0:04:48.279
<v Speaker 1>The AFC was weaker and a bit of a jumbled mess.

0:04:48.320 --> 0:04:52.159
<v Speaker 1>The NFC was stronger with Seattle constantly on top, and

0:04:52.440 --> 0:04:54.760
<v Speaker 1>we got the scroll. They got a few things on

0:04:54.839 --> 0:04:58.520
<v Speaker 1>the non football playing side. First of all, look love

0:04:58.560 --> 0:05:02.400
<v Speaker 1>Mike Turrico, consider him a friend. He had one of

0:05:02.440 --> 0:05:05.240
<v Speaker 1>my favorite calls of the night when he talked about

0:05:05.240 --> 0:05:08.159
<v Speaker 1>the rocket scientist jumping onto the field. I just thought

0:05:08.160 --> 0:05:11.640
<v Speaker 1>that was a I love that. That's what he That's

0:05:11.680 --> 0:05:14.360
<v Speaker 1>how he referred to the guy that whatever happened on

0:05:14.400 --> 0:05:16.800
<v Speaker 1>the field. Obviously, those of us not there live don't

0:05:16.800 --> 0:05:21.479
<v Speaker 1>know what the interruption was, but I liked the shout

0:05:21.480 --> 0:05:25.479
<v Speaker 1>out to rocket scientists, bad bunny. The Super Bowl party,

0:05:25.480 --> 0:05:28.480
<v Speaker 1>I was at everybody's like, well, that was interesting, and

0:05:29.080 --> 0:05:30.800
<v Speaker 1>as somebody who grew up in Miami, it was very

0:05:30.800 --> 0:05:34.680
<v Speaker 1>familiar to me. I enjoyed sort of the tour of

0:05:34.960 --> 0:05:39.400
<v Speaker 1>Latin culture and the Puerto Rican culture, you know, going

0:05:39.440 --> 0:05:42.440
<v Speaker 1>through the dominoes and the weddings and the cantinnaras and

0:05:42.480 --> 0:05:45.160
<v Speaker 1>all that stuff. I thought that was a nice little touch.

0:05:45.240 --> 0:05:49.599
<v Speaker 1>But I have no doubt that there'll be a lot

0:05:49.640 --> 0:05:54.320
<v Speaker 1>of dumb social media takes on this. But if you're

0:05:54.360 --> 0:05:57.520
<v Speaker 1>the NFL, you were there to expand your fan base,

0:05:58.279 --> 0:06:02.000
<v Speaker 1>to continue this outreach to Latin America, and Bad Bunny

0:06:02.000 --> 0:06:04.719
<v Speaker 1>did the job. I think that the NFL was hoping

0:06:04.720 --> 0:06:09.200
<v Speaker 1>that he would do on that front. I'm sure if

0:06:09.240 --> 0:06:11.080
<v Speaker 1>you're trying to find out how popular it was, my

0:06:11.120 --> 0:06:13.240
<v Speaker 1>guess is, if you like Trump, you didn't like Bad Money,

0:06:13.240 --> 0:06:14.839
<v Speaker 1>And if you didn't like Trump, you said, wow, that

0:06:14.920 --> 0:06:20.120
<v Speaker 1>was terrific. You know, not everybody's a Bad Bunny fan,

0:06:20.200 --> 0:06:23.359
<v Speaker 1>but I get what he was trying to do. I

0:06:23.360 --> 0:06:27.400
<v Speaker 1>thought it was interesting, I thought it was unique, and

0:06:27.440 --> 0:06:33.000
<v Speaker 1>I thought it was worth watching. On that the commercials,

0:06:33.839 --> 0:06:37.120
<v Speaker 1>I'm just creeped out by the d aging. I'm sorry

0:06:37.160 --> 0:06:41.360
<v Speaker 1>that weird Eccinity ad with Jurassic Park and all. I'd

0:06:41.480 --> 0:06:44.719
<v Speaker 1>rather see all those actors as they are now, give

0:06:44.760 --> 0:06:46.120
<v Speaker 1>them to me with all their gray hair. It might

0:06:46.160 --> 0:06:50.359
<v Speaker 1>even be funnier if they did that. But all of

0:06:50.400 --> 0:06:52.479
<v Speaker 1>the d aging, and it was in a few ads.

0:06:52.480 --> 0:06:55.960
<v Speaker 1>It wasn't just that one. It was oh, the Goodwill Hunt,

0:06:56.000 --> 0:07:01.680
<v Speaker 1>the dunkin Donuts ad with everybody looking d aged except

0:07:01.720 --> 0:07:05.360
<v Speaker 1>for Brady, which I guess was the Brady was always

0:07:05.360 --> 0:07:10.720
<v Speaker 1>sort of Benjamin Button. Anyway, Again, I know all these guys,

0:07:10.800 --> 0:07:13.600
<v Speaker 1>have these all these great new tools to mess with

0:07:13.640 --> 0:07:16.720
<v Speaker 1>thanks to AI, thanks to d aging, but eh, a

0:07:16.720 --> 0:07:22.440
<v Speaker 1>little overused. I'm a little creeped out about it. I'm intrigued.

0:07:22.440 --> 0:07:23.560
<v Speaker 1>I didn't know there was going to be a Once

0:07:23.600 --> 0:07:26.840
<v Speaker 1>upon a Time in Hollywood sequel, so call me intrigued

0:07:26.880 --> 0:07:29.200
<v Speaker 1>on that. So thank you super Bowl commercial for that.

0:07:30.280 --> 0:07:33.720
<v Speaker 1>And finally, I guess this was I said it would

0:07:33.760 --> 0:07:35.720
<v Speaker 1>be the year of the AI ad. There were certainly

0:07:35.760 --> 0:07:45.120
<v Speaker 1>AI companies and teases and and different AI agents being advertised.

0:07:45.320 --> 0:07:47.360
<v Speaker 1>It felt like, my guess is just like what we

0:07:47.400 --> 0:07:50.920
<v Speaker 1>saw during the Crypto super Bowl a couple of years ago,

0:07:51.600 --> 0:07:53.840
<v Speaker 1>and we had our Internet super Bowl way back when

0:07:55.680 --> 0:07:59.360
<v Speaker 1>half of those AI agents that advertised in this super

0:07:59.360 --> 0:08:02.080
<v Speaker 1>Bowl will not be in existence in what three years?

0:08:02.720 --> 0:08:04.760
<v Speaker 1>What should we make the over under that two and

0:08:04.760 --> 0:08:08.320
<v Speaker 1>a half years that some of these companies will no

0:08:08.400 --> 0:08:13.040
<v Speaker 1>longer be be relevant or be ever heard of, or

0:08:13.200 --> 0:08:15.080
<v Speaker 1>some of these things the only time we'll ever hear

0:08:15.120 --> 0:08:18.560
<v Speaker 1>from them might actually be the Super Bowl ad you

0:08:18.600 --> 0:08:24.720
<v Speaker 1>watched last night. But all in all, I'm sad that

0:08:24.760 --> 0:08:27.400
<v Speaker 1>football season's over. I am a huge football fan. I

0:08:27.440 --> 0:08:30.600
<v Speaker 1>love it, but hey, let's turn to basketball. We got

0:08:30.640 --> 0:08:33.200
<v Speaker 1>the All Star weekend. Next weekend, we got the best

0:08:33.200 --> 0:08:37.200
<v Speaker 1>part of college basketball coming up, so I know how

0:08:37.240 --> 0:08:38.960
<v Speaker 1>I'm going to be spending a lot of my evenings

0:08:39.080 --> 0:08:42.120
<v Speaker 1>over the next over the next few weeks. And as

0:08:42.160 --> 0:08:45.720
<v Speaker 1>I told you before, I love the Olympics. So there.

0:08:45.760 --> 0:08:49.160
<v Speaker 1>So look, we got through the Super Bowl without two

0:08:49.360 --> 0:08:53.080
<v Speaker 1>without any political disruption, which is kind of nice. And

0:08:53.120 --> 0:08:55.760
<v Speaker 1>I barely made it through the Super Bowl without one

0:08:56.040 --> 0:08:59.520
<v Speaker 1>Cali disruption from my dog. All right, so let's get

0:08:59.520 --> 0:09:02.199
<v Speaker 1>focused on the show ahead. Let me give you a

0:09:02.280 --> 0:09:05.760
<v Speaker 1>quick little table of contents. I've got a few things

0:09:05.800 --> 0:09:09.600
<v Speaker 1>to say about the about the weekend that was with

0:09:09.679 --> 0:09:16.480
<v Speaker 1>Donald Trump, both the European essentially the Europeans at the

0:09:16.520 --> 0:09:22.720
<v Speaker 1>Olympics expressing their expressing their opinion about Team USA and

0:09:22.760 --> 0:09:25.680
<v Speaker 1>how humiliating that was for US Americans watching on TV

0:09:25.840 --> 0:09:28.800
<v Speaker 1>and live. We'll get to that. We've got the Donald

0:09:28.800 --> 0:09:32.840
<v Speaker 1>Trump racist meme. And what's interesting about that story is,

0:09:33.160 --> 0:09:34.559
<v Speaker 1>like with a lot of things with Donald Trump, I

0:09:35.320 --> 0:09:38.480
<v Speaker 1>don't know how we're surprised or shocked that he does

0:09:38.559 --> 0:09:42.040
<v Speaker 1>something that's racist, that he either shares a post that's

0:09:42.160 --> 0:09:48.280
<v Speaker 1>racist or implies something that is racist. And you know,

0:09:48.880 --> 0:09:51.600
<v Speaker 1>there's always this question, is he you know, he always

0:09:51.600 --> 0:09:53.839
<v Speaker 1>wants to say I'm the least racist person. But as

0:09:53.960 --> 0:09:56.080
<v Speaker 1>there was a great debate line back in twenty eighteen,

0:09:56.120 --> 0:09:58.880
<v Speaker 1>I think it's Andrew Gillham to Ronda Santis, I don't

0:09:58.880 --> 0:10:00.800
<v Speaker 1>know if you're racist, but a lot of racist people

0:10:00.800 --> 0:10:06.560
<v Speaker 1>think you're racist. The point is this consistency of Donald

0:10:06.559 --> 0:10:10.839
<v Speaker 1>Trump that whenever sort of there's a line, he's willing

0:10:10.880 --> 0:10:13.959
<v Speaker 1>to cross it and be on the side of those

0:10:14.520 --> 0:10:16.240
<v Speaker 1>that would be accused of being racist. But we're going

0:10:16.280 --> 0:10:18.400
<v Speaker 1>to get to that in a minute. I also have

0:10:18.559 --> 0:10:22.439
<v Speaker 1>the most underreported story last week that is is a

0:10:22.720 --> 0:10:27.320
<v Speaker 1>huge consequence to campaign twenty twenty six and why perhaps

0:10:28.480 --> 0:10:32.480
<v Speaker 1>we can call the election right now. We can, at

0:10:32.559 --> 0:10:34.520
<v Speaker 1>least on the House side, that we can call it

0:10:34.640 --> 0:10:39.839
<v Speaker 1>right now. I will explain statistically why that is later

0:10:39.960 --> 0:10:47.080
<v Speaker 1>in this episode, but let's get started with the fallout

0:10:47.120 --> 0:10:50.920
<v Speaker 1>from Donald Trump and the racist meme attacking the Obamas,

0:10:51.559 --> 0:10:55.200
<v Speaker 1>because you know, whenever we have these incidents with him,

0:10:56.480 --> 0:10:59.160
<v Speaker 1>because these are very frequent, right, you can go down

0:10:59.200 --> 0:11:01.280
<v Speaker 1>the litany of lists. We can go back all the

0:11:01.320 --> 0:11:04.080
<v Speaker 1>way to twenty fifteen. Frankly, with Donald Trump, you can

0:11:04.080 --> 0:11:05.800
<v Speaker 1>go all the way back to the eighties in the

0:11:05.840 --> 0:11:07.960
<v Speaker 1>Central Park five. Actually, if you want, you can go.

0:11:08.200 --> 0:11:11.199
<v Speaker 1>When it comes to race and the questions of racism,

0:11:11.200 --> 0:11:12.800
<v Speaker 1>you go all the way back to the early seventies

0:11:12.840 --> 0:11:14.360
<v Speaker 1>when he had to go hire a lawyer named Roy

0:11:14.400 --> 0:11:20.320
<v Speaker 1>Cone because the Nixon government, the Nixon led Justice Department,

0:11:20.400 --> 0:11:29.120
<v Speaker 1>was investigating his father's firm, essentially for bias in how

0:11:29.160 --> 0:11:34.160
<v Speaker 1>they rented and sold houses and apartments in suburban New

0:11:34.240 --> 0:11:38.679
<v Speaker 1>York City. So the point is the accusation of racism.

0:11:38.720 --> 0:11:42.720
<v Speaker 1>The question about whether he was racially tolerant or not,

0:11:42.840 --> 0:11:45.160
<v Speaker 1>or racially accepting or not, has been hovering over Donald

0:11:45.160 --> 0:11:49.520
<v Speaker 1>Trump for his entire adult life. He leans sometimes, it

0:11:49.600 --> 0:11:54.360
<v Speaker 1>seems as if he leans into racist tropes almost as

0:11:54.400 --> 0:11:56.520
<v Speaker 1>a way to quote. Maybe he thinks he's owning the

0:11:56.559 --> 0:12:02.199
<v Speaker 1>Libs or he's somehow giving fuel to his base. I

0:12:02.240 --> 0:12:04.160
<v Speaker 1>think sometimes he insults his own base. I think he

0:12:04.240 --> 0:12:08.120
<v Speaker 1>thinks that deep down that the MAGA base is all racists.

0:12:08.520 --> 0:12:12.439
<v Speaker 1>So that's why he plays to it, which if you

0:12:12.520 --> 0:12:15.920
<v Speaker 1>believe it is in his agenda, but you're not racist,

0:12:15.920 --> 0:12:20.000
<v Speaker 1>should offend you. And I think that that was so.

0:12:20.200 --> 0:12:23.400
<v Speaker 1>The what I took away from this story was not

0:12:23.480 --> 0:12:27.000
<v Speaker 1>that Donald Trump did this. Of course Donald Trump did this, right,

0:12:27.040 --> 0:12:32.400
<v Speaker 1>That is not the news. What was new and important

0:12:32.520 --> 0:12:36.600
<v Speaker 1>to chronicle in this story was the immediate reactions of

0:12:36.600 --> 0:12:39.480
<v Speaker 1>people like Tim Scott, who said, this is the most

0:12:39.559 --> 0:12:41.559
<v Speaker 1>racist thing that's come out of this White House. By

0:12:41.559 --> 0:12:44.640
<v Speaker 1>the way, that phrasing was fascinating, right, talk about a

0:12:44.679 --> 0:12:47.920
<v Speaker 1>guy you'd like to put under a polygraph and say, huh,

0:12:47.960 --> 0:12:50.400
<v Speaker 1>you're implying you've seen other racist things come out of

0:12:50.400 --> 0:12:53.000
<v Speaker 1>this White House. Right by saying this is the most racist.

0:12:53.200 --> 0:12:55.600
<v Speaker 1>He didn't say this was the only racist thing that

0:12:55.640 --> 0:12:58.640
<v Speaker 1>came out of this White House. So that's of note.

0:12:58.720 --> 0:13:01.040
<v Speaker 1>Let's just say I listened to words very carefully, and

0:13:01.120 --> 0:13:07.360
<v Speaker 1>yes I part sentences too much. So assuming the other

0:13:07.520 --> 0:13:12.960
<v Speaker 1>aspect of this was watching how many other Republicans decided

0:13:13.000 --> 0:13:15.240
<v Speaker 1>to go in on that, and there was the weasel words.

0:13:15.440 --> 0:13:18.520
<v Speaker 1>I can't imagine he did this. It must have been

0:13:18.520 --> 0:13:21.480
<v Speaker 1>a staffer, right, these staffers that apparently are up as

0:13:21.559 --> 0:13:26.280
<v Speaker 1>late as he is. To the President's credit, he essentially

0:13:26.760 --> 0:13:32.240
<v Speaker 1>while he didn't he's essentially admitted he did it. He's now,

0:13:32.360 --> 0:13:35.640
<v Speaker 1>I think, claiming he didn't see it all the way through.

0:13:35.679 --> 0:13:38.080
<v Speaker 1>So we didn't see how it was ending. It's how

0:13:38.120 --> 0:13:40.680
<v Speaker 1>he wants to go. But it's it's interesting that he

0:13:41.040 --> 0:13:46.880
<v Speaker 1>kind of, you know, reversed the bus that that the

0:13:47.440 --> 0:13:51.000
<v Speaker 1>that ran over the staffer that everybody decided, whoever this

0:13:51.280 --> 0:13:54.120
<v Speaker 1>imaginary staffer was that did it. One would assume it's

0:13:54.160 --> 0:13:58.600
<v Speaker 1>the caddy Dan Scavino, who supposedly runs all the social

0:13:58.600 --> 0:14:01.559
<v Speaker 1>media accounts from time to time, but they never did

0:14:01.840 --> 0:14:04.240
<v Speaker 1>say his name. It was sort of implied, but it

0:14:04.280 --> 0:14:06.800
<v Speaker 1>was Donald Trump's way of bringing back the PUS. But

0:14:07.040 --> 0:14:10.480
<v Speaker 1>the point was, and this goes back to something I

0:14:10.520 --> 0:14:15.679
<v Speaker 1>wrote on Substack last fall, which was the cracks are

0:14:15.720 --> 0:14:20.400
<v Speaker 1>beginning to show in the Trump coalition. Well, I don't

0:14:20.440 --> 0:14:22.680
<v Speaker 1>know if a week's gone by where the cracks haven't

0:14:22.720 --> 0:14:26.680
<v Speaker 1>gotten deeper, where you haven't had another Republican either decide

0:14:26.720 --> 0:14:29.360
<v Speaker 1>not to seek reelection or decide to back away in

0:14:29.400 --> 0:14:33.440
<v Speaker 1>some way. The comfort that more Republicans have in criticizing

0:14:33.520 --> 0:14:37.200
<v Speaker 1>him publicly, in questioning him publicly. Look, I'm not going

0:14:37.240 --> 0:14:40.200
<v Speaker 1>to sit here and say it's an avalanche of criticism

0:14:40.240 --> 0:14:43.200
<v Speaker 1>coming from Republicans, but you are starting to see that

0:14:43.240 --> 0:14:45.720
<v Speaker 1>more of them realize they're the ones that are going

0:14:45.760 --> 0:14:48.000
<v Speaker 1>to be on the ballot. The future of the party

0:14:48.080 --> 0:14:50.440
<v Speaker 1>is in their hands because Donald Trump doesn't care about

0:14:50.440 --> 0:14:52.560
<v Speaker 1>the future of the party. And you throw in the

0:14:52.560 --> 0:14:56.280
<v Speaker 1>fact that I know to say Donald Trump had ever

0:14:56.400 --> 0:15:01.440
<v Speaker 1>had a filter, it might be might be an understatement.

0:15:01.520 --> 0:15:05.440
<v Speaker 1>But here's what we do know. As people age, whatever

0:15:05.520 --> 0:15:08.520
<v Speaker 1>filter they have goes away. So he didn't have much

0:15:08.520 --> 0:15:13.040
<v Speaker 1>of a filter before. But it's but it's possible Donald

0:15:13.080 --> 0:15:16.520
<v Speaker 1>Trump five years ago might have might have had some

0:15:17.320 --> 0:15:20.120
<v Speaker 1>little voice in his head to say, don't retweet that

0:15:20.240 --> 0:15:26.280
<v Speaker 1>Obama Obama racist meme. And this time there's no right

0:15:26.320 --> 0:15:28.640
<v Speaker 1>He's that he's living in his He's living in a

0:15:28.720 --> 0:15:32.400
<v Speaker 1>cocoon that seems to be even more self serving than

0:15:32.440 --> 0:15:35.360
<v Speaker 1>ever before. He does not seem to appear like when

0:15:35.360 --> 0:15:39.680
<v Speaker 1>he was asked about Jadie Vance getting booed at the

0:15:39.760 --> 0:15:43.560
<v Speaker 1>Olympics during the opening ceremonies, he seemed to feign surprised

0:15:43.560 --> 0:15:45.760
<v Speaker 1>by that. Maybe that's his way of spinning, or maybe

0:15:45.800 --> 0:15:48.760
<v Speaker 1>he really is in this cocoon that he doesn't realize

0:15:48.800 --> 0:15:52.560
<v Speaker 1>how unpopular his administration is, how unpopular he is, and

0:15:52.600 --> 0:15:55.440
<v Speaker 1>how unpopular jd Vance is growing, but particularly in Europe.

0:15:55.480 --> 0:15:58.840
<v Speaker 1>If he doesn't understand Teddy Vance has gone to Europe

0:15:58.840 --> 0:16:01.520
<v Speaker 1>and attacked Europe every different way. He has attacked the

0:16:01.520 --> 0:16:04.280
<v Speaker 1>culture of Western Europe. He is he essentially said, you're

0:16:04.320 --> 0:16:08.280
<v Speaker 1>bringing all this on yourself, and and he has gone

0:16:08.280 --> 0:16:14.480
<v Speaker 1>there to to to give aid and comfort to all

0:16:14.560 --> 0:16:17.240
<v Speaker 1>of these right wing movements that are very offensive to

0:16:17.280 --> 0:16:20.840
<v Speaker 1>a lot of Western Europeans, particularly the ones that go

0:16:20.880 --> 0:16:25.560
<v Speaker 1>to the Olympics that can afford to travel. Let's just

0:16:25.600 --> 0:16:29.160
<v Speaker 1>say this ain't a jade Van's crowd, and it's you know,

0:16:29.200 --> 0:16:32.480
<v Speaker 1>it's I would caution the president to be careful attacking

0:16:32.520 --> 0:16:37.040
<v Speaker 1>Americans who American athletes who speak out. This is the

0:16:37.160 --> 0:16:40.080
<v Speaker 1>age we live in. And I have to say I've

0:16:40.080 --> 0:16:42.320
<v Speaker 1>been impressed. The athletes are all trying to walk a line.

0:16:42.360 --> 0:16:45.560
<v Speaker 1>You can see it. But it's uncomfortable. It's no fun

0:16:46.080 --> 0:16:48.800
<v Speaker 1>to be an American overseas. And no, I have no

0:16:48.960 --> 0:16:52.480
<v Speaker 1>doubt there are other athletes in the in the village

0:16:52.840 --> 0:16:56.080
<v Speaker 1>giving American athletes grief that there is a cold shoulder.

0:16:57.360 --> 0:17:00.000
<v Speaker 1>You talk to any Americans to travel overseas right now,

0:17:00.600 --> 0:17:03.560
<v Speaker 1>it is uncomfortable. It's much worse than it was during

0:17:03.560 --> 0:17:09.520
<v Speaker 1>the Iraq War. So it is. It wouldn't surprise me

0:17:11.560 --> 0:17:14.200
<v Speaker 1>that when you sort of look at why Trump doesn't

0:17:14.240 --> 0:17:17.280
<v Speaker 1>see how bad things are going for him, that because

0:17:17.320 --> 0:17:20.200
<v Speaker 1>they've created this safe space in the Oval Office for

0:17:20.320 --> 0:17:23.240
<v Speaker 1>him and they sort of block out any negative news,

0:17:23.400 --> 0:17:27.680
<v Speaker 1>only show him like pieces of polls that give him

0:17:27.800 --> 0:17:30.320
<v Speaker 1>aid and comfort, but they don't show him the big pictures.

0:17:30.320 --> 0:17:37.199
<v Speaker 1>So he really doesn't know how bad things are. It

0:17:37.280 --> 0:17:39.760
<v Speaker 1>only is going to lead for him to do more mistakes.

0:17:39.760 --> 0:17:41.719
<v Speaker 1>I mean you want to if you want evidence by

0:17:41.760 --> 0:17:44.920
<v Speaker 1>the way of the filter being totally and completely gone,

0:17:45.119 --> 0:17:47.159
<v Speaker 1>just look go back and look at that performance at

0:17:47.160 --> 0:17:51.040
<v Speaker 1>the National Prayer Breakfast where he was just awful and attacking,

0:17:51.200 --> 0:17:56.720
<v Speaker 1>just attacking Democrats, saying democrats aren't can't be religious people.

0:17:56.800 --> 0:18:01.359
<v Speaker 1>It was just it couldn't have been more American and

0:18:01.440 --> 0:18:06.800
<v Speaker 1>certainly more anti First Amendment than what he did. But

0:18:06.880 --> 0:18:09.080
<v Speaker 1>I do think it's important to note how much he

0:18:09.119 --> 0:18:12.000
<v Speaker 1>has put his party in jeopardy just in these first

0:18:12.119 --> 0:18:15.919
<v Speaker 1>six weeks of this calendar year. Right, the year began

0:18:16.000 --> 0:18:18.760
<v Speaker 1>with the Madua extradition, which looked like it was going

0:18:18.800 --> 0:18:20.959
<v Speaker 1>to be a good news story for him. Right, it

0:18:21.040 --> 0:18:26.520
<v Speaker 1>was an impressive military operation. They extracted Madureau out and

0:18:26.560 --> 0:18:30.560
<v Speaker 1>it seemed as if they made it seem relatively easy,

0:18:30.600 --> 0:18:35.200
<v Speaker 1>and as a military operation, it was relatively easy. Now

0:18:36.240 --> 0:18:39.679
<v Speaker 1>he is now botching the aftermath, right, he is not

0:18:39.840 --> 0:18:45.280
<v Speaker 1>interested in standing up democracy. He has rejected the democratic

0:18:45.320 --> 0:18:51.120
<v Speaker 1>elected leaders in Venezuela and not endorsed them. He went

0:18:51.119 --> 0:18:55.320
<v Speaker 1>ahead and accepted that peace prize from MS Machado, which

0:18:55.359 --> 0:18:59.280
<v Speaker 1>is still one of the most It's not surprising, but

0:18:59.359 --> 0:19:02.600
<v Speaker 1>still seems so brazen and I can't believe he did it.

0:19:03.960 --> 0:19:05.959
<v Speaker 1>But I say this because beginning with then, and if

0:19:06.000 --> 0:19:07.840
<v Speaker 1>you think about it, there hasn't been a week that

0:19:07.880 --> 0:19:10.879
<v Speaker 1>hasn't gone by, if not more, where he has said

0:19:11.359 --> 0:19:15.120
<v Speaker 1>or done something that has put Republicans on the defensive.

0:19:15.200 --> 0:19:18.199
<v Speaker 1>It's one thing to see, right the left get upset

0:19:18.240 --> 0:19:19.600
<v Speaker 1>and the media and you can say, okay, this is

0:19:19.640 --> 0:19:22.560
<v Speaker 1>partisan back and forth. But the distinction I want to

0:19:22.600 --> 0:19:25.440
<v Speaker 1>make here is, like what we saw with the Obama

0:19:25.520 --> 0:19:30.320
<v Speaker 1>racist me the Obviously there was plenty of outrage from

0:19:30.359 --> 0:19:32.760
<v Speaker 1>people on the left and in the center, but to

0:19:32.960 --> 0:19:38.679
<v Speaker 1>see elected Republicans express public outrage and the type of

0:19:38.680 --> 0:19:42.520
<v Speaker 1>Republicans that did these weren't the liberal Republicans that always

0:19:42.520 --> 0:19:46.480
<v Speaker 1>criticized Trump, right, like you're Lisa Murkowski's perhaps you're Don

0:19:46.520 --> 0:19:49.960
<v Speaker 1>Bacons and folks like that. It was no or Tom

0:19:50.000 --> 0:19:53.440
<v Speaker 1>Tillis who has become more comfortable criticizing Trump of late.

0:19:53.840 --> 0:19:57.280
<v Speaker 1>It was Tim Scott, right, it was Roger Wicker. It

0:19:57.359 --> 0:20:02.120
<v Speaker 1>was Pete Ricketts, who, by the way, in an increasingly

0:20:02.280 --> 0:20:06.720
<v Speaker 1>more competitive US Senate race, Tim Scott, head of the NRSC,

0:20:07.280 --> 0:20:10.960
<v Speaker 1>who just delivered some dire warnings to his Senate Republican

0:20:11.000 --> 0:20:14.280
<v Speaker 1>conference that hey, Trump's approval ratings are a huge problem,

0:20:14.520 --> 0:20:16.639
<v Speaker 1>and the Senate is really in play. And oh, by

0:20:16.680 --> 0:20:19.560
<v Speaker 1>the way, it may not matter who they nominate in Texas,

0:20:20.160 --> 0:20:22.960
<v Speaker 1>it's going to be a competitive race and a money suck.

0:20:23.119 --> 0:20:25.960
<v Speaker 1>So look in each individual case. And by the way,

0:20:26.040 --> 0:20:28.920
<v Speaker 1>Roger Wicker, I think is just speaking out because he's

0:20:28.920 --> 0:20:33.919
<v Speaker 1>got an extraordinarily large African American constituency in Mississippi. But

0:20:33.960 --> 0:20:35.920
<v Speaker 1>if you wanted to put it in pure political terms,

0:20:35.960 --> 0:20:39.000
<v Speaker 1>there's also a potentially competitive US Senate seat there. It's

0:20:39.040 --> 0:20:42.280
<v Speaker 1>not his seat, it's Sydney hind Smith, the other Senate

0:20:42.320 --> 0:20:45.399
<v Speaker 1>seat there. So you could say the three of them

0:20:45.440 --> 0:20:48.879
<v Speaker 1>all have their own political motivations to speak out and

0:20:49.480 --> 0:20:53.840
<v Speaker 1>not wanting to be seen as silent co conspirators to

0:20:53.880 --> 0:20:59.560
<v Speaker 1>Trump's racism. But that's just the latest. Right, last week,

0:21:00.040 --> 0:21:02.600
<v Speaker 1>did I lead my what did I lead the show

0:21:02.600 --> 0:21:07.680
<v Speaker 1>with the corruption from the corruption story from the Wall

0:21:07.680 --> 0:21:14.919
<v Speaker 1>Street Journal that had a the UAE essentially as a

0:21:14.920 --> 0:21:20.480
<v Speaker 1>government invest in the National Security Advisor, the UAE invest

0:21:20.520 --> 0:21:24.479
<v Speaker 1>in Trump's company for Trump's kids, company's crypto company four

0:21:24.560 --> 0:21:27.080
<v Speaker 1>days before the inauguration, and of course it leads to

0:21:27.119 --> 0:21:32.040
<v Speaker 1>a foreign policy change. It is at least half a

0:21:32.200 --> 0:21:35.840
<v Speaker 1>billion dollars in investment, one hundred and thirty million dollars

0:21:35.880 --> 0:21:39.119
<v Speaker 1>in direct cash to the Trump's literally just cash. And

0:21:39.160 --> 0:21:42.280
<v Speaker 1>as Andrew McCarthy, this conservative legal analyst that writes for

0:21:42.320 --> 0:21:46.480
<v Speaker 1>The National Review, said, you know who was extraordinarily critical

0:21:46.480 --> 0:21:51.360
<v Speaker 1>of sort of the mixing the bidens did of the professional,

0:21:51.760 --> 0:21:56.119
<v Speaker 1>the personal, the political, and the family with Hunter Biden

0:21:56.240 --> 0:22:01.480
<v Speaker 1>and Joe Biden. He said this, this is literally exponentially worse,

0:22:02.160 --> 0:22:05.560
<v Speaker 1>uh and at a at another level of corrupt. So

0:22:05.600 --> 0:22:07.960
<v Speaker 1>if you were outraged by the corruption of of of

0:22:08.040 --> 0:22:11.200
<v Speaker 1>Joe Biden and thought that it may have reached in

0:22:11.400 --> 0:22:14.760
<v Speaker 1>the level of impeachment, what Andrew McCarthy is arguing, and

0:22:14.800 --> 0:22:19.680
<v Speaker 1>again conservatively right, This is the conservative National review legal

0:22:19.720 --> 0:22:24.760
<v Speaker 1>ailis this he said, is literally he said, add a

0:22:24.800 --> 0:22:28.280
<v Speaker 1>couple of zeros of worse to this. Okay, not one zero,

0:22:28.400 --> 0:22:31.680
<v Speaker 1>a couple of zeros when it comes to this, because

0:22:31.680 --> 0:22:35.680
<v Speaker 1>the actual financial corruption is unbelievable, and the direct policy

0:22:35.800 --> 0:22:41.240
<v Speaker 1>changes that came from you know, following the actual transactions,

0:22:41.520 --> 0:22:45.679
<v Speaker 1>you know, you didn't quite see it as crystal clear

0:22:46.200 --> 0:22:48.520
<v Speaker 1>with the purchase of the Hunter Biden paintings and all

0:22:48.560 --> 0:22:52.439
<v Speaker 1>of that. It was a little less directly related to

0:22:52.520 --> 0:22:57.000
<v Speaker 1>actual policy changes with Trump. Right, there's no there's no subtlety.

0:22:57.800 --> 0:23:00.280
<v Speaker 1>H And that was another point that McCarthy made. That's

0:23:00.359 --> 0:23:02.840
<v Speaker 1>just that was last week, right in the week before

0:23:02.880 --> 0:23:05.600
<v Speaker 1>we had this second killing of an American citizen by

0:23:05.680 --> 0:23:10.640
<v Speaker 1>ICE agents in Minneapolis, right two different weekends, essentially due

0:23:10.640 --> 0:23:14.399
<v Speaker 1>to that, where again Republicans were criticizing the policy and

0:23:14.400 --> 0:23:18.240
<v Speaker 1>feeling uncomfortable on this Abu Dhabi investment. Many Republicans aren't

0:23:18.240 --> 0:23:20.919
<v Speaker 1>saying a word, but you now have Republican legal analysts

0:23:20.960 --> 0:23:23.640
<v Speaker 1>who can't look away and have to realize that, hey, this,

0:23:24.240 --> 0:23:27.200
<v Speaker 1>if you thought Biden, what the Bidens did between Hunter

0:23:27.240 --> 0:23:29.560
<v Speaker 1>Biden Joe Biden was corrupt, then what the Trumps are

0:23:29.600 --> 0:23:35.560
<v Speaker 1>doing is historic in its level of corruption. There's the

0:23:35.600 --> 0:23:38.439
<v Speaker 1>bizarre raid of Fulton County and the votes. There's the

0:23:39.160 --> 0:23:43.760
<v Speaker 1>talk about federalizing elections, which the most anti small sea

0:23:43.840 --> 0:23:46.800
<v Speaker 1>conservative thing you could come up with. The thing is

0:23:46.920 --> 0:23:50.280
<v Speaker 1>all of this. If I brought up Greenland and the

0:23:50.440 --> 0:23:56.800
<v Speaker 1>controversy that sort of Royal Davos, and essentially it's arguably

0:23:56.840 --> 0:23:59.200
<v Speaker 1>it is Greenland that has helped you unite Europe against

0:23:59.280 --> 0:24:02.199
<v Speaker 1>the United States, which of course triggered Canada to go

0:24:02.240 --> 0:24:03.920
<v Speaker 1>do a trade deal with China that we had been

0:24:03.960 --> 0:24:07.880
<v Speaker 1>hoping that they wouldn't do when it came to our

0:24:07.960 --> 0:24:12.399
<v Speaker 1>concerns about sovereignty and security when it involves China. So again,

0:24:12.640 --> 0:24:17.000
<v Speaker 1>everything I've just discussed has all taken place since January third.

0:24:17.320 --> 0:24:21.639
<v Speaker 1>We are at this is February ninth, folks, and I

0:24:21.680 --> 0:24:24.320
<v Speaker 1>say a week hasn't gone by. It seems like every

0:24:24.359 --> 0:24:28.880
<v Speaker 1>there's at least two major incidents a week where Trump

0:24:28.960 --> 0:24:32.119
<v Speaker 1>either says something or does something that's putting Republicans on

0:24:32.160 --> 0:24:35.160
<v Speaker 1>the defensive, that is urging Republicans to have to speak out.

0:24:36.480 --> 0:24:42.120
<v Speaker 1>This is a growing electoral disaster, and I don't think

0:24:42.240 --> 0:24:49.760
<v Speaker 1>folks fully appreciate what's coming. This episode of the Chuck

0:24:49.800 --> 0:24:52.439
<v Speaker 1>Podcast is being brought to you by Quints. As you know,

0:24:52.520 --> 0:24:55.520
<v Speaker 1>a well built wardrobe is about the pieces that work together,

0:24:55.640 --> 0:24:58.199
<v Speaker 1>hold up over time, and frankly allow you to be

0:24:58.480 --> 0:25:02.800
<v Speaker 1>flexible and sort of business. It's casual to say social casual.

0:25:02.960 --> 0:25:06.320
<v Speaker 1>Quins does this really well. They have premium material, thoughtful design,

0:25:06.520 --> 0:25:09.440
<v Speaker 1>and some everyday staples that feel easy to wear, easy

0:25:09.480 --> 0:25:12.440
<v Speaker 1>to rely on even as the weather shifts. I've got

0:25:12.480 --> 0:25:15.239
<v Speaker 1>some sweaters from Quints. I love them. I can use

0:25:15.280 --> 0:25:17.320
<v Speaker 1>them for here on the podcast. I can do a

0:25:17.359 --> 0:25:20.000
<v Speaker 1>business meeting with them. They have every day essentials. I

0:25:20.040 --> 0:25:22.480
<v Speaker 1>love the quality so far. It's lasting really well. I've

0:25:22.480 --> 0:25:24.960
<v Speaker 1>had it for a while. They have organic cotton sweaters,

0:25:25.000 --> 0:25:28.120
<v Speaker 1>polos for every occasion. They have some nice jackets, including

0:25:28.160 --> 0:25:30.879
<v Speaker 1>you know, lighter jackets as things I hope warm up

0:25:30.880 --> 0:25:32.840
<v Speaker 1>at some point down here in the mid Atlantic. The

0:25:32.880 --> 0:25:34.960
<v Speaker 1>list goes on. All of it is built to hold

0:25:35.040 --> 0:25:37.600
<v Speaker 1>up for you to wear this stuff all the time, right,

0:25:37.840 --> 0:25:40.040
<v Speaker 1>Not just something you pull out once a quarter to

0:25:40.080 --> 0:25:42.640
<v Speaker 1>look nice at work, now stuff that you might wear

0:25:42.680 --> 0:25:45.240
<v Speaker 1>every week. They only partner with factories that meet some

0:25:45.359 --> 0:25:49.919
<v Speaker 1>rigorous standards for crashmanship and ethical product bottom line, I

0:25:49.960 --> 0:25:52.639
<v Speaker 1>wear it, I'm happy. It's been really good. It isn't

0:25:52.800 --> 0:25:56.480
<v Speaker 1>going to break the bank, So refresh your wardrobe with Quints.

0:25:56.640 --> 0:26:00.160
<v Speaker 1>Go to quins dot com slash chuck for free ship

0:26:00.400 --> 0:26:02.760
<v Speaker 1>on your order and a three hundred and sixty five

0:26:02.920 --> 0:26:05.840
<v Speaker 1>day opportunity to return it. Now available in Canada too.

0:26:05.920 --> 0:26:11.320
<v Speaker 1>That's qui NC dot com slash chuck, free shipping, three

0:26:11.359 --> 0:26:15.800
<v Speaker 1>hundred and sixty five day returns quints dot com slash chuck.

0:26:16.680 --> 0:26:19.320
<v Speaker 1>Do you hate hangovers, We'll say goodbye to hangovers. Out

0:26:19.320 --> 0:26:21.880
<v Speaker 1>of Office gives you the social buzz without the next

0:26:21.960 --> 0:26:24.239
<v Speaker 1>day regret. Their best selling out of Office gummies were

0:26:24.280 --> 0:26:27.160
<v Speaker 1>designed to provide a mild, relaxing buzz, boost your mood

0:26:27.240 --> 0:26:30.800
<v Speaker 1>and enhance creativity and relaxation. With five different strengths, you

0:26:30.840 --> 0:26:33.040
<v Speaker 1>can tailor the dose to fit your vibe, from a

0:26:33.119 --> 0:26:37.840
<v Speaker 1>gentle one point five milligram microdose to their newest fifteen

0:26:37.880 --> 0:26:41.960
<v Speaker 1>milligram gummy for a more elevated experience. Their THHC beverages

0:26:42.000 --> 0:26:45.159
<v Speaker 1>and gummies are a modern, mindful alternative to a glass

0:26:45.200 --> 0:26:47.400
<v Speaker 1>of wine or a cocktail. And I'll tell you this,

0:26:47.600 --> 0:26:50.560
<v Speaker 1>I've given up booze. I don't like the hangovers, I

0:26:50.840 --> 0:26:54.199
<v Speaker 1>prefer the gummy experience. Soul is a wellness brand that

0:26:54.280 --> 0:26:57.760
<v Speaker 1>believes feeling good should be fun and easy. Soul specializes

0:26:57.800 --> 0:27:01.439
<v Speaker 1>in delicious HEMP derived THCHC, and CBD products, all designed

0:27:01.480 --> 0:27:04.520
<v Speaker 1>to boost your mood and simply help you unwind. So

0:27:04.600 --> 0:27:06.840
<v Speaker 1>if you struggle to switch off at night, Sol also

0:27:06.880 --> 0:27:09.879
<v Speaker 1>has a variety of products specifically designed to just simply

0:27:09.920 --> 0:27:12.359
<v Speaker 1>help you get a better night's sleep, including their top

0:27:12.440 --> 0:27:16.560
<v Speaker 1>selling Sleepy gummies. It's a fan favorite for deep restorative sleep.

0:27:16.800 --> 0:27:19.000
<v Speaker 1>So bring on the good vibes and treat yourself to

0:27:19.040 --> 0:27:22.800
<v Speaker 1>Soul today. Right now, Soul is offering my audience thirty

0:27:22.840 --> 0:27:25.920
<v Speaker 1>percent off your entire order, So go to getsold dot

0:27:25.960 --> 0:27:30.000
<v Speaker 1>Com use the promo code toodcast. Don't forget that code.

0:27:30.160 --> 0:27:34.840
<v Speaker 1>That's getsold dot Com promo code toodcast for thirty percent off.

0:27:39.000 --> 0:27:43.800
<v Speaker 1>So that brings me to what I think is the

0:27:43.880 --> 0:27:48.080
<v Speaker 1>most underreported story from last week. Obviously the Obama racist beme.

0:27:48.560 --> 0:27:50.640
<v Speaker 1>We have the Abu Dhabi story. You have the fear

0:27:50.640 --> 0:27:54.000
<v Speaker 1>of federalizing elections. Those arguably those three stories all got

0:27:54.000 --> 0:27:58.360
<v Speaker 1>more attention last week than the milestone that was reached

0:28:00.119 --> 0:28:04.680
<v Speaker 1>week when we got our fiftieth and fifty first incumbent

0:28:05.119 --> 0:28:09.280
<v Speaker 1>member of Congress deciding not to run for reelection in

0:28:09.320 --> 0:28:13.480
<v Speaker 1>twenty twenty six. This marks now we are inching ever

0:28:13.560 --> 0:28:19.359
<v Speaker 1>closer to the highest ever open seat total in a

0:28:19.440 --> 0:28:25.600
<v Speaker 1>midterm year basically since World War Two. Okay, in twenty eighteen,

0:28:25.640 --> 0:28:29.520
<v Speaker 1>there were fifty five members of Congress who chose not

0:28:29.640 --> 0:28:33.240
<v Speaker 1>to return. Either they didn't seek reelection or they decided

0:28:33.280 --> 0:28:35.919
<v Speaker 1>to go seek higher office, but they did not seek reelection.

0:28:36.000 --> 0:28:40.160
<v Speaker 1>We are sitting now at fifty one. There's still most

0:28:40.200 --> 0:28:43.240
<v Speaker 1>of the filing deadlines have not yet passed. We haven't

0:28:43.240 --> 0:28:45.760
<v Speaker 1>had the California filing deadline pass, and we know there's

0:28:45.760 --> 0:28:47.920
<v Speaker 1>going to be a handful of Republicans likely that walk

0:28:47.960 --> 0:28:50.720
<v Speaker 1>away because of the remap. We have the Virginia remap

0:28:50.800 --> 0:28:53.280
<v Speaker 1>that's likely to happen, that's going to lead to some retirements.

0:28:53.440 --> 0:28:55.920
<v Speaker 1>We've got the Florida remap that's likely to lead to

0:28:55.960 --> 0:28:58.000
<v Speaker 1>some retirement. So we are well on our way. The

0:28:58.040 --> 0:29:03.120
<v Speaker 1>all time record, by the way, is sixty five open

0:29:03.160 --> 0:29:05.120
<v Speaker 1>seats going into an election year, and that was back

0:29:05.120 --> 0:29:09.720
<v Speaker 1>in nineteen ninety two. That was a confluence of circumstances.

0:29:09.720 --> 0:29:11.840
<v Speaker 1>It was a reapportionment year, so you had your typical

0:29:12.360 --> 0:29:14.160
<v Speaker 1>you had that, but it was the first time that

0:29:14.200 --> 0:29:19.360
<v Speaker 1>the Justice Department insisted on majority minority districts in certain

0:29:19.400 --> 0:29:24.280
<v Speaker 1>Southern states, which even led to a more upheaval in

0:29:24.440 --> 0:29:26.880
<v Speaker 1>how the maps were drawn all over the country, but

0:29:26.960 --> 0:29:31.280
<v Speaker 1>particularly in the South. And you also that was the

0:29:31.600 --> 0:29:34.120
<v Speaker 1>if you did not if you chose to retire that year.

0:29:34.120 --> 0:29:36.120
<v Speaker 1>There was one other loophole which encouraged a lot of

0:29:36.120 --> 0:29:38.840
<v Speaker 1>incumbents to leave office at nineteen ninety two and not

0:29:38.880 --> 0:29:41.400
<v Speaker 1>seek reelection. If you left in nineteen ninety two, you

0:29:41.440 --> 0:29:44.240
<v Speaker 1>got to keep whatever leftover campaign money you had, and

0:29:44.280 --> 0:29:46.040
<v Speaker 1>you got to keep it and make it your money.

0:29:46.040 --> 0:29:48.600
<v Speaker 1>You could turn it into an ioa or investment fund literally.

0:29:49.600 --> 0:29:51.920
<v Speaker 1>But if you chose to stay, you no longer it

0:29:52.000 --> 0:29:56.640
<v Speaker 1>was no longer legal for you to make campaign money

0:29:56.680 --> 0:30:01.120
<v Speaker 1>your own money. That's right, folks. It used to be

0:30:00.000 --> 0:30:04.520
<v Speaker 1>members of Congress could take their campaign treasury and when

0:30:04.520 --> 0:30:07.320
<v Speaker 1>they were done running, they could pocket whatever was left.

0:30:08.120 --> 0:30:11.840
<v Speaker 1>That was perfectly legal. Now if you pocket it, at

0:30:11.880 --> 0:30:14.040
<v Speaker 1>least you have to come up with dummy corporations and

0:30:14.160 --> 0:30:22.400
<v Speaker 1>charge your campaign account invented items for reimbursement in order

0:30:22.480 --> 0:30:25.040
<v Speaker 1>to try to get that money, but before you could

0:30:25.080 --> 0:30:27.800
<v Speaker 1>just pocket it. So that's why ninety two is sort

0:30:27.800 --> 0:30:30.520
<v Speaker 1>of an outlier. But the real important story is for

0:30:30.600 --> 0:30:33.479
<v Speaker 1>a mid term cycle. And I've gone back and studied

0:30:33.480 --> 0:30:37.000
<v Speaker 1>this since nineteen fifty four at fifty one open seats.

0:30:37.040 --> 0:30:40.920
<v Speaker 1>Right now, we are only four away from the modern

0:30:40.920 --> 0:30:43.240
<v Speaker 1>record of fifty five, which was twenty eighteen, which led

0:30:43.240 --> 0:30:46.000
<v Speaker 1>to a forty seat pickup for the out party. We're

0:30:46.000 --> 0:30:47.840
<v Speaker 1>going to pass that. The question is how close to

0:30:47.880 --> 0:30:53.320
<v Speaker 1>sixty five will we get? So how did we get there? All? Right?

0:30:53.360 --> 0:30:56.400
<v Speaker 1>The latest two names, right, it didn't make what didn't

0:30:56.440 --> 0:30:59.080
<v Speaker 1>make huge news? You didn't see it on any cable news.

0:30:59.160 --> 0:31:03.960
<v Speaker 1>Chiron was Barry Loudermilk of Georgia, Mark Emmedi of Nevada.

0:31:04.000 --> 0:31:09.880
<v Speaker 1>Both Republicans and Republican solid Republican seats. They're unlikely to

0:31:12.720 --> 0:31:14.840
<v Speaker 1>see de You know, they were going to likely win

0:31:14.920 --> 0:31:17.800
<v Speaker 1>reelection had they chosen to run. But what's interesting about

0:31:17.800 --> 0:31:19.880
<v Speaker 1>both of them, and it's part of a larger trend

0:31:19.880 --> 0:31:21.800
<v Speaker 1>I want to get into. Both were elected before Donald

0:31:21.800 --> 0:31:25.840
<v Speaker 1>Trump took office, and both fit a growing category of

0:31:25.920 --> 0:31:29.280
<v Speaker 1>Republican retirees that I call the exhaustion caucus. These are

0:31:29.320 --> 0:31:31.880
<v Speaker 1>members who are no longer looking for a promotion in politics,

0:31:31.960 --> 0:31:33.880
<v Speaker 1>right running for governor, running for Senate, running for some

0:31:33.960 --> 0:31:36.160
<v Speaker 1>over the office. They're just looking for an exit, right.

0:31:36.320 --> 0:31:40.200
<v Speaker 1>Ludermoak was elected in twenty fourteen and started serving in

0:31:40.240 --> 0:31:43.240
<v Speaker 1>January twenty fifteen. In fact, in his statement announcing his retirement,

0:31:43.240 --> 0:31:47.600
<v Speaker 1>he leaned into the citizen legislator idea. Representing people in Congress,

0:31:47.640 --> 0:31:49.160
<v Speaker 1>he said is a service, not a career, and he

0:31:49.200 --> 0:31:52.040
<v Speaker 1>talked about focusing on family, being a husband and a grandfather.

0:31:52.080 --> 0:31:53.560
<v Speaker 1>He didn't come up and just try to light the

0:31:53.560 --> 0:31:57.360
<v Speaker 1>place on fire. Amedi has represented that second district in Nevada.

0:31:57.960 --> 0:32:01.560
<v Speaker 1>He won a twenty eleven special election. He's the lone

0:32:01.600 --> 0:32:04.719
<v Speaker 1>Republican in the Nevada delegation. And he framed his decision

0:32:04.760 --> 0:32:07.960
<v Speaker 1>as passing the torch after roughly fifteen years in Washington,

0:32:08.440 --> 0:32:10.719
<v Speaker 1>and he said it's time he announced early because they

0:32:10.720 --> 0:32:12.800
<v Speaker 1>have a later filing deadline. Want to give others time

0:32:13.120 --> 0:32:16.480
<v Speaker 1>to step up. And again, this is the one congressional

0:32:16.520 --> 0:32:19.720
<v Speaker 1>seat that represents basically everything in Nevada that is in

0:32:19.720 --> 0:32:24.240
<v Speaker 1>the Las Vegas media market. Essentially. Now, look, they don't

0:32:24.240 --> 0:32:26.880
<v Speaker 1>seem like guys that are plotting a comeback. They're just done.

0:32:28.000 --> 0:32:31.080
<v Speaker 1>And I think that distinction matters, because the most revealing

0:32:31.120 --> 0:32:34.480
<v Speaker 1>thing to think about in these retirements is that there's

0:32:34.960 --> 0:32:38.920
<v Speaker 1>clearly two different forces operating here at once, particularly when

0:32:38.960 --> 0:32:42.240
<v Speaker 1>it comes to motivating what certain Republicans try to degree do.

0:32:42.640 --> 0:32:44.720
<v Speaker 1>Because you have now we're up to I believe, twenty

0:32:44.800 --> 0:32:48.000
<v Speaker 1>nine Republicans who have announced that they're not seeking reelection,

0:32:48.440 --> 0:32:50.960
<v Speaker 1>About half are running for another office, and about half

0:32:51.040 --> 0:32:54.640
<v Speaker 1>are just walking away. Right that group that's walking away,

0:32:54.840 --> 0:32:57.480
<v Speaker 1>they're tired, tired of the grind, tired of the incentives.

0:32:57.640 --> 0:33:00.600
<v Speaker 1>A lot of them don't like the performative, the way

0:33:00.680 --> 0:33:03.680
<v Speaker 1>political theater now is the dominant force of American politics

0:33:03.920 --> 0:33:07.160
<v Speaker 1>that you don't get any credit for doing legislating. Of course,

0:33:07.160 --> 0:33:09.520
<v Speaker 1>the other group is leaving because you know, they just

0:33:09.680 --> 0:33:11.800
<v Speaker 1>always had viewed the House as a stepping stone, and

0:33:11.840 --> 0:33:13.080
<v Speaker 1>this is going to be a bad year to be

0:33:13.120 --> 0:33:15.080
<v Speaker 1>an incumbent Republican, so you might as well go up

0:33:15.120 --> 0:33:17.320
<v Speaker 1>and out because maybe you can set yourself up for

0:33:17.400 --> 0:33:20.400
<v Speaker 1>another office two or four years down the road. Now,

0:33:20.440 --> 0:33:23.040
<v Speaker 1>it's going to create a massive experience gap at some point,

0:33:23.160 --> 0:33:25.600
<v Speaker 1>right we are seeing a massive churn, and so there's

0:33:25.600 --> 0:33:27.440
<v Speaker 1>going to be a lot of institutional memories that go

0:33:27.520 --> 0:33:30.560
<v Speaker 1>away because the longtime members are the committee chairs that

0:33:30.600 --> 0:33:33.640
<v Speaker 1>are leaving the institutional memory types when they walk out

0:33:33.640 --> 0:33:36.080
<v Speaker 1>the door. You don't just lose votes, you lose people

0:33:36.080 --> 0:33:39.800
<v Speaker 1>who know how to legislate, how to negotiate, frankly, how

0:33:39.880 --> 0:33:43.400
<v Speaker 1>to work across the aisle, even in this dysfunctional atmosphere.

0:33:44.400 --> 0:33:45.960
<v Speaker 1>And what it will mean is we're going to have

0:33:45.960 --> 0:33:48.360
<v Speaker 1>a House it's likely to be more political, more partisan,

0:33:48.400 --> 0:33:52.240
<v Speaker 1>more junior, more ambitious, more online, which means less functional.

0:33:53.000 --> 0:33:58.320
<v Speaker 1>So it's you know, we'll wait to see what this

0:33:58.360 --> 0:34:00.480
<v Speaker 1>Congress looks like in twenty twenty seven, but that's a

0:34:00.720 --> 0:34:05.000
<v Speaker 1>likely problem. So fifty one, Why does fifty one open

0:34:05.000 --> 0:34:08.080
<v Speaker 1>seats matter beyond being just a big number? And why

0:34:08.080 --> 0:34:12.000
<v Speaker 1>am I now essentially saying, hey, you can call it now.

0:34:12.040 --> 0:34:15.000
<v Speaker 1>The Democrats have one, They're gonna win the House. It

0:34:15.040 --> 0:34:19.120
<v Speaker 1>would take an historical set of events that we have

0:34:19.239 --> 0:34:22.120
<v Speaker 1>no idea what they would look like for this not

0:34:22.239 --> 0:34:25.279
<v Speaker 1>to be the case. Because open seats always behave like

0:34:25.320 --> 0:34:27.680
<v Speaker 1>a political accelerant. Right when a seat is open, the

0:34:27.719 --> 0:34:31.799
<v Speaker 1>incumbent advantage disappears. National environment matters, more, money matters more,

0:34:31.960 --> 0:34:34.799
<v Speaker 1>Candidate quality matters more. Historically, when open seats pile up early,

0:34:35.320 --> 0:34:36.920
<v Speaker 1>it tends to mean one of two things. Either the

0:34:36.960 --> 0:34:40.480
<v Speaker 1>majority party is bracing for impact or the members closest

0:34:40.520 --> 0:34:42.600
<v Speaker 1>to the ground are seeing something coming that everyone else

0:34:42.680 --> 0:34:46.360
<v Speaker 1>is still denying. And the other tell, of course, is

0:34:46.360 --> 0:34:50.000
<v Speaker 1>that it's February. February. Retirements are the early warning system.

0:34:50.080 --> 0:34:53.399
<v Speaker 1>If you're already at fifty one now, it suggests there's

0:34:53.440 --> 0:34:56.640
<v Speaker 1>a lot of quiet quitting still sitting on people's desks.

0:34:56.719 --> 0:34:59.279
<v Speaker 1>So let's talk about records, because this is where people

0:34:59.320 --> 0:35:02.200
<v Speaker 1>can get sloppy. As I said, the modern mid mid

0:35:02.400 --> 0:35:05.799
<v Speaker 1>term era benchmark, and then there's the all time benchmark.

0:35:07.719 --> 0:35:11.800
<v Speaker 1>The modern benchmarks midterms since nineteen fifty four, the cycles

0:35:11.840 --> 0:35:15.040
<v Speaker 1>with the huge retirement waves in the television era nineteen

0:35:15.080 --> 0:35:18.480
<v Speaker 1>ninety four, twenty ten, twenty eighteen. Those are my modern

0:35:18.560 --> 0:35:22.399
<v Speaker 1>reference points. And when retirement numbers start approaching that neighborhood

0:35:22.920 --> 0:35:26.759
<v Speaker 1>forty plus, history usually points in one direction, trouble for

0:35:26.800 --> 0:35:29.600
<v Speaker 1>the party in power, right, And if you extend the

0:35:29.680 --> 0:35:35.080
<v Speaker 1>lens beyond the midterms, you have to use nineteen ninety two.

0:35:35.120 --> 0:35:39.840
<v Speaker 1>Is that modern is that modern high of retirement, sixty

0:35:40.000 --> 0:35:44.279
<v Speaker 1>five House members choosing not to run again. And as

0:35:44.320 --> 0:35:47.360
<v Speaker 1>I told you, there was a variety of reasons why

0:35:47.719 --> 0:35:50.200
<v Speaker 1>that created such a massive shake up. It was still

0:35:50.239 --> 0:35:51.800
<v Speaker 1>to this day over there, I think, where there was

0:35:51.800 --> 0:35:54.080
<v Speaker 1>one hundred and ten new members of Congress, and it

0:35:54.120 --> 0:35:56.920
<v Speaker 1>also led to then seventy three more new members of

0:35:56.920 --> 0:36:00.640
<v Speaker 1>Congress the following cycle in a four year cycle really

0:36:01.200 --> 0:36:04.120
<v Speaker 1>basically cycled out. Anybody that was left from the fifties

0:36:04.120 --> 0:36:07.880
<v Speaker 1>and sixties in Congress was sort of really totally cycled

0:36:07.880 --> 0:36:17.680
<v Speaker 1>out by nineteen ninety four. So now I want to

0:36:17.719 --> 0:36:20.680
<v Speaker 1>be mindful of the fact that nothing is statistically sound

0:36:20.719 --> 0:36:22.279
<v Speaker 1>here that I'm gonna say, right, when you only have

0:36:23.120 --> 0:36:27.080
<v Speaker 1>when you only have like fifteen incidentss to use, right,

0:36:27.160 --> 0:36:29.920
<v Speaker 1>you can't say this is statistically sound. But I do

0:36:29.960 --> 0:36:33.440
<v Speaker 1>think the patterns matter here a lot. So in the

0:36:33.480 --> 0:36:35.439
<v Speaker 1>spirit of that argument, I'm gonna frame it this way.

0:36:37.000 --> 0:36:41.960
<v Speaker 1>Once you see the number of open seats get over twenty,

0:36:42.200 --> 0:36:46.560
<v Speaker 1>just twenty, it becomes extremely difficult for the majority party

0:36:46.600 --> 0:36:49.600
<v Speaker 1>to hold the line because open seats are the proxy

0:36:49.640 --> 0:36:52.239
<v Speaker 1>for vulnerability and opportunity. Well, guess what we're now over

0:36:52.680 --> 0:36:57.759
<v Speaker 1>fifty with essentially too with essentially about sixty percent of

0:36:57.800 --> 0:37:01.520
<v Speaker 1>them being Republican, it's about two one. Here is where

0:37:01.520 --> 0:37:05.520
<v Speaker 1>we're sitting at now. Open seats aren't a cause for

0:37:05.600 --> 0:37:09.480
<v Speaker 1>the wave, but they're the early warning sign that the

0:37:09.520 --> 0:37:13.320
<v Speaker 1>ground is shifting and that you have some longtime incumbents

0:37:13.320 --> 0:37:15.799
<v Speaker 1>reading tea leaves deciding they'd rather leave on their own

0:37:15.880 --> 0:37:19.479
<v Speaker 1>terms than get swept out and humiliated. And then there's

0:37:19.640 --> 0:37:23.200
<v Speaker 1>always one other piece to the puzzle. Presidential approval. Open

0:37:23.239 --> 0:37:26.200
<v Speaker 1>seats are the engine. Presidential approval rating is the fuel.

0:37:26.560 --> 0:37:29.560
<v Speaker 1>The president is popular, the party can sometimes blunt losses

0:37:29.880 --> 0:37:32.719
<v Speaker 1>the president is unpopular, especially if they're just sitting below

0:37:32.800 --> 0:37:35.800
<v Speaker 1>fifty percent approval, and Donald Trump hasn't seen forty five.

0:37:36.000 --> 0:37:39.520
<v Speaker 1>It seems like in four months, let alone fifty. Midterms

0:37:39.560 --> 0:37:43.040
<v Speaker 1>usually then become nationalized and become a national referendum. So

0:37:43.080 --> 0:37:45.720
<v Speaker 1>you have a president's approval ratings sitting in the low forties,

0:37:45.760 --> 0:37:49.520
<v Speaker 1>which look a lot like Bush going into six, Obama

0:37:49.600 --> 0:37:53.759
<v Speaker 1>going into fourteen and ten, frankly, and Bill Clinton going

0:37:53.760 --> 0:37:58.800
<v Speaker 1>in to nineteen ninety four. So, putting all this together,

0:37:58.880 --> 0:38:01.080
<v Speaker 1>here's why this story is in face. It's accelerating we've

0:38:01.120 --> 0:38:04.000
<v Speaker 1>entered the most volatile period for retirements, late winter to

0:38:04.080 --> 0:38:08.359
<v Speaker 1>spring wind decision window. Members are looking at fundraising, the map,

0:38:08.400 --> 0:38:10.399
<v Speaker 1>the mood, their own lives, and of course all these

0:38:10.440 --> 0:38:14.200
<v Speaker 1>redistricting threats as well, and they're all deciding whether it's

0:38:14.200 --> 0:38:15.600
<v Speaker 1>worth it. Do they want to get to know a

0:38:15.640 --> 0:38:18.759
<v Speaker 1>new constituency for a cycle that may not go very well.

0:38:19.320 --> 0:38:21.319
<v Speaker 1>I think we know the answer to that. And if

0:38:21.360 --> 0:38:23.279
<v Speaker 1>you want to know where the next tranch of names

0:38:23.360 --> 0:38:25.480
<v Speaker 1>is likely to come from on the retirement watch list,

0:38:25.800 --> 0:38:27.799
<v Speaker 1>there's a couple of states where maps are in motion,

0:38:27.920 --> 0:38:31.360
<v Speaker 1>Florida and Virginia. Right DeSantis has a special session in

0:38:31.400 --> 0:38:33.839
<v Speaker 1>April where he wants to focus on redrawing the map,

0:38:33.880 --> 0:38:37.000
<v Speaker 1>try to pick up four or five seats of more

0:38:37.040 --> 0:38:40.520
<v Speaker 1>seats that are more Republican, seeing if he can somehow

0:38:40.560 --> 0:38:44.120
<v Speaker 1>squeeze more Republican districts out of that map. I'm skeptical,

0:38:44.200 --> 0:38:46.200
<v Speaker 1>but they think they can get a couple, especially if

0:38:46.200 --> 0:38:48.440
<v Speaker 1>the Voting Rights Act essentially gets swept away by the

0:38:48.440 --> 0:38:53.200
<v Speaker 1>Supreme Courts. But when you're shaking up that map, it's

0:38:53.239 --> 0:38:55.960
<v Speaker 1>likely to lead to retirements. We hadn't thought about even

0:38:56.000 --> 0:38:59.160
<v Speaker 1>some incumbents. If it creates an incumbent incumbent fight stuff

0:38:59.200 --> 0:39:02.680
<v Speaker 1>like that. Then, of course Virginia where Democrats are pushing

0:39:02.719 --> 0:39:05.960
<v Speaker 1>for a mechanism to enable new maps, right, there's going

0:39:06.000 --> 0:39:10.200
<v Speaker 1>to be a special constitutional amendment election in order to

0:39:10.200 --> 0:39:13.720
<v Speaker 1>get permission. And if they do that, they may eliminate

0:39:13.719 --> 0:39:17.680
<v Speaker 1>four Republican incumbents and most of them likely won't try

0:39:17.719 --> 0:39:21.880
<v Speaker 1>to seek re elections. So we're sitting at fifty one

0:39:21.960 --> 0:39:25.560
<v Speaker 1>right now. The likelihood that this grows to over fifty five,

0:39:25.600 --> 0:39:28.080
<v Speaker 1>which was the number that was hit in eighteen when

0:39:28.120 --> 0:39:30.960
<v Speaker 1>Democrats then the out party, won over forty seats, then

0:39:31.000 --> 0:39:33.919
<v Speaker 1>you see where this is going, right, We already see

0:39:33.920 --> 0:39:37.600
<v Speaker 1>the Houses already showing signs of high volatility. Majority party

0:39:37.680 --> 0:39:42.439
<v Speaker 1>is bleeding its incumbency advantage. And oh, by the way,

0:39:42.480 --> 0:39:45.680
<v Speaker 1>what happened over the weekend? Two more special elections we're

0:39:45.760 --> 0:39:49.000
<v Speaker 1>in very red And yes they're state legislative elections. Yes

0:39:49.040 --> 0:39:52.000
<v Speaker 1>they're special elections happening on a weekend, And yes, the

0:39:52.080 --> 0:39:55.160
<v Speaker 1>Democrats have more voters who pay more attention to these

0:39:55.360 --> 0:39:59.720
<v Speaker 1>special elections and Republicans do. Okay, Well, that means Democrats

0:39:59.760 --> 0:40:02.200
<v Speaker 1>are pay attention. It means Democrats are more fired up

0:40:02.719 --> 0:40:06.560
<v Speaker 1>and you know, we're seeing another weekend of over performance

0:40:06.600 --> 0:40:10.720
<v Speaker 1>by Democrats in legislative districts that Trump carried by double digits.

0:40:10.840 --> 0:40:13.200
<v Speaker 1>And it seems like another you know, this is like

0:40:13.440 --> 0:40:16.439
<v Speaker 1>you know, another plane land safely at national right. It's

0:40:16.440 --> 0:40:18.840
<v Speaker 1>happening with such frequency it's hard to call it news.

0:40:18.880 --> 0:40:23.680
<v Speaker 1>It's almost like that continuation. So you all, this is happening.

0:40:24.800 --> 0:40:28.600
<v Speaker 1>You've got open seats hitting critical territory. And like I said,

0:40:28.600 --> 0:40:32.520
<v Speaker 1>we've got I looked it up. There's another and this

0:40:32.600 --> 0:40:38.279
<v Speaker 1>is this is intriguing here, there's another one, two, three, four, five, six,

0:40:38.280 --> 0:40:40.840
<v Speaker 1>seventy eight, nine, ten, eleven, twelve, thirteen, fourteen, fifteen, sixteen,

0:40:40.840 --> 0:40:42.920
<v Speaker 1>seventy eighteen, nineteen, twenty twenty one to two, twenty three,

0:40:42.920 --> 0:40:45.760
<v Speaker 1>twenty four to twenty five, twenty six, twight seven. Okay,

0:40:45.840 --> 0:40:50.839
<v Speaker 1>there's another twenty seven Republican incumbents sitting in districts where

0:40:50.880 --> 0:40:54.319
<v Speaker 1>Donald Trump received fifty nine percent or less into twenty

0:40:54.320 --> 0:40:56.719
<v Speaker 1>twenty four presidential vote. And I've put the market fifty

0:40:56.800 --> 0:41:00.319
<v Speaker 1>nine percent I think now given the over performance, given

0:41:00.360 --> 0:41:04.440
<v Speaker 1>Trump's approval ratings, and frankly is just terrible leadership right

0:41:04.480 --> 0:41:07.920
<v Speaker 1>now of the party on messaging anybody sitting in a

0:41:07.960 --> 0:41:12.520
<v Speaker 1>fifty nine percent Trump district or less should be scared nestless. Okay,

0:41:12.719 --> 0:41:16.279
<v Speaker 1>they should be feeling it a lot. Well, there's these

0:41:16.680 --> 0:41:18.560
<v Speaker 1>Republicans I was just telling you about. There's a big

0:41:18.640 --> 0:41:21.480
<v Speaker 1>chunk of California Republicans. That filing deadline is March six.

0:41:22.080 --> 0:41:25.280
<v Speaker 1>Some Georgia Republicans sit in there. Do any more throat

0:41:25.520 --> 0:41:29.680
<v Speaker 1>decide to do that. Wisconsin's filing deadline, Michigan's filing deadline,

0:41:31.400 --> 0:41:33.480
<v Speaker 1>there's a New York filing deadline in May, which you

0:41:33.480 --> 0:41:37.719
<v Speaker 1>could see it change a little bit. So this is

0:41:37.760 --> 0:41:41.560
<v Speaker 1>a list that's likely to grow. And again I go

0:41:41.680 --> 0:41:45.719
<v Speaker 1>back every single here. You could just look at this.

0:41:45.960 --> 0:41:48.840
<v Speaker 1>I put together these different midterm charts. So twenty eighteen

0:41:48.960 --> 0:41:52.520
<v Speaker 1>fifty five open seats the out party, the Democrats, gained

0:41:52.680 --> 0:41:57.160
<v Speaker 1>forty seats, flip control. Right. In twenty twenty two, there

0:41:57.160 --> 0:42:01.080
<v Speaker 1>were forty nine open seats, Republicans nine seats, and they

0:42:01.120 --> 0:42:04.760
<v Speaker 1>flipped control. Nineteen ninety four, there were forty eight open seats,

0:42:05.080 --> 0:42:08.960
<v Speaker 1>Republicans netted fifty two overall and flipped control. Twenty ten,

0:42:09.120 --> 0:42:14.000
<v Speaker 1>thirty eight open seats, Republicans gained sixty three flipped control.

0:42:14.239 --> 0:42:17.960
<v Speaker 1>Two thousand and six, thirty one open seats, Democrats gained

0:42:17.960 --> 0:42:22.960
<v Speaker 1>thirty one seats and flipped control. Nineteen fifty eight, there

0:42:22.960 --> 0:42:28.239
<v Speaker 1>were twenty eight open seats, Democrats gained forty eight. They

0:42:28.239 --> 0:42:30.600
<v Speaker 1>already held control, they were already in charge, but they

0:42:30.600 --> 0:42:33.640
<v Speaker 1>netted another forty eight. Nineteen eighty two, a similar situation.

0:42:33.760 --> 0:42:36.080
<v Speaker 1>There were twenty four open seats, So I just gave

0:42:36.120 --> 0:42:41.120
<v Speaker 1>you in the midterms in order there right, every single one,

0:42:41.320 --> 0:42:44.359
<v Speaker 1>twenty four and above, going back to nineteen fifty four

0:42:44.400 --> 0:42:50.720
<v Speaker 1>to midterms, and the out party always gained seats, and

0:42:50.880 --> 0:42:54.080
<v Speaker 1>many times it flipped. Most of the time it flipped

0:42:54.080 --> 0:42:57.759
<v Speaker 1>control of the House. So the point is, at this

0:42:57.920 --> 0:43:02.880
<v Speaker 1>point in time, it is hard to come up with

0:43:02.880 --> 0:43:06.360
<v Speaker 1>a scenario where Republicans are going to hold the House.

0:43:07.120 --> 0:43:12.160
<v Speaker 1>Every historical marker says otherwise. The only two times where

0:43:12.200 --> 0:43:14.360
<v Speaker 1>the party in power was able to do well is

0:43:14.360 --> 0:43:17.760
<v Speaker 1>when the two when presidential approval was over sixty percent

0:43:17.800 --> 0:43:21.280
<v Speaker 1>Bill Clinton in nineteen ninety eight and George W. Bush

0:43:21.360 --> 0:43:24.040
<v Speaker 1>in two thousand and two. That was post nine to eleven.

0:43:24.080 --> 0:43:29.200
<v Speaker 1>Nineteen ninety eight was the Monica backlash, where Clinton's personal

0:43:29.280 --> 0:43:32.080
<v Speaker 1>rating was in the toilet, but his professional rating was

0:43:32.239 --> 0:43:34.960
<v Speaker 1>sky high. It was this weird. The voter was almost

0:43:35.200 --> 0:43:37.400
<v Speaker 1>like stubborn about it. No, we don't like Clinton, and

0:43:37.520 --> 0:43:39.400
<v Speaker 1>yes we love the job he's doing. It was like

0:43:39.560 --> 0:43:43.680
<v Speaker 1>we were It was this fascinating split in the way

0:43:43.760 --> 0:43:47.239
<v Speaker 1>polling was registering. No, people were looking for a way

0:43:47.280 --> 0:43:51.239
<v Speaker 1>to express personal disgust at what Trump, at what Clinton did,

0:43:51.800 --> 0:43:55.120
<v Speaker 1>but they didn't. But they wanted to make it clear

0:43:55.160 --> 0:43:57.279
<v Speaker 1>they didn't want him thrown out of office over it. Right,

0:43:57.320 --> 0:44:00.480
<v Speaker 1>And so you would see this dichotomy in the where

0:44:00.520 --> 0:44:04.399
<v Speaker 1>his favorable rating, his personal favorable rating was upside down,

0:44:04.640 --> 0:44:08.040
<v Speaker 1>but his professional rating was through the roof. The point

0:44:08.080 --> 0:44:11.520
<v Speaker 1>is those are the two exceptions. Now ask yourself, what's

0:44:11.520 --> 0:44:14.640
<v Speaker 1>Donald Trump going to do between now and November to

0:44:14.840 --> 0:44:21.680
<v Speaker 1>somehow get a sixty percent joberating? Is it improbable? Yes,

0:44:21.760 --> 0:44:24.040
<v Speaker 1>I'm never gonna say anything's impossible in the Trump earrow,

0:44:24.120 --> 0:44:33.799
<v Speaker 1>that's for sure. But the point is massive unexpected outside

0:44:33.880 --> 0:44:39.400
<v Speaker 1>events like you know, aliens landing, you know in the Arctic,

0:44:39.520 --> 0:44:41.960
<v Speaker 1>I mean, you know, whatever it is, like, it is

0:44:42.440 --> 0:44:49.120
<v Speaker 1>stuff you cannot you cannot say is a feasible likely

0:44:49.280 --> 0:44:55.520
<v Speaker 1>event to happen? Right? So, and of course what's really

0:44:55.600 --> 0:45:00.880
<v Speaker 1>happening right now with Donald Trump, is he is epitomizing

0:45:01.000 --> 0:45:04.960
<v Speaker 1>the saying that I love to quote from Haley Barber,

0:45:05.360 --> 0:45:09.160
<v Speaker 1>the long time Republican operative and governor of Mississippi, who'd

0:45:09.160 --> 0:45:12.200
<v Speaker 1>love to and I think it's somebody else's expression first.

0:45:12.200 --> 0:45:15.319
<v Speaker 1>But good gets better and bad gets worse. And as

0:45:15.400 --> 0:45:19.160
<v Speaker 1>we're seeing with Donald Trump, that is getting worse every week. Right.

0:45:19.560 --> 0:45:23.000
<v Speaker 1>It feels like every week he throws another log on

0:45:23.160 --> 0:45:28.160
<v Speaker 1>the let me piss off more than half the country bonfire.

0:45:28.920 --> 0:45:34.040
<v Speaker 1>And that's why you're seeing more and more Republicans figure

0:45:34.040 --> 0:45:36.040
<v Speaker 1>out a way to push back. Some say it publicly,

0:45:36.840 --> 0:45:40.400
<v Speaker 1>some choose not to file for reelection, and others may

0:45:40.440 --> 0:45:44.799
<v Speaker 1>be contemplating doing either of those things. Because if they

0:45:44.840 --> 0:45:48.080
<v Speaker 1>want to speak out but they think it'll backfire, then

0:45:48.080 --> 0:45:51.680
<v Speaker 1>my guess is they walk away if they assess their

0:45:51.719 --> 0:45:58.040
<v Speaker 1>political situation and decide maybe they can survive by going

0:45:58.080 --> 0:46:00.840
<v Speaker 1>after Trump. Maybe he's becoming more unpopular. Maybe the Epstein

0:46:00.880 --> 0:46:02.919
<v Speaker 1>files have left to Mark by the way, I didn't

0:46:02.920 --> 0:46:06.239
<v Speaker 1>even get to the Epstein files. Right, That's like the

0:46:06.280 --> 0:46:11.360
<v Speaker 1>other none of that has gotten any better for him either.

0:46:11.520 --> 0:46:14.239
<v Speaker 1>It may be sullying the Clintons Bill Clinton a little bit.

0:46:14.280 --> 0:46:17.880
<v Speaker 1>By the way, I still don't I don't under you know,

0:46:17.960 --> 0:46:20.960
<v Speaker 1>other than Republicans wanting to attach Hillary Clinton to anything

0:46:21.000 --> 0:46:22.960
<v Speaker 1>that they can attach her to. I do not understand

0:46:22.960 --> 0:46:26.799
<v Speaker 1>why she's being asked to testify on anything Epstein. Right.

0:46:26.800 --> 0:46:28.440
<v Speaker 1>There's nothing in the files in any case she was

0:46:28.480 --> 0:46:31.440
<v Speaker 1>ever on the planes, ever did anything, et cetera. I

0:46:31.480 --> 0:46:34.680
<v Speaker 1>guess they'll say, well, she must have had some played

0:46:34.719 --> 0:46:37.319
<v Speaker 1>some part in the Clinton Foundation and the relationship with

0:46:37.360 --> 0:46:41.719
<v Speaker 1>Gallaine Maxwell, even that seems beyond tenuous at best. She

0:46:41.920 --> 0:46:47.000
<v Speaker 1>was a sitting senator at the time, So I don't

0:46:47.000 --> 0:46:49.000
<v Speaker 1>get that one. I don't see Melinda Gates being called

0:46:49.040 --> 0:46:52.959
<v Speaker 1>up to find out what she knew about about Bill

0:46:52.960 --> 0:46:56.960
<v Speaker 1>Gates's relationships with Jeffrey Epstein, Right, We don't see any

0:46:57.000 --> 0:46:59.320
<v Speaker 1>of that. So that seems to be a head scratcher

0:47:00.200 --> 0:47:02.640
<v Speaker 1>on that one. And we'll see if that that's one

0:47:02.680 --> 0:47:06.080
<v Speaker 1>of those that I would say to mister comer, be

0:47:06.120 --> 0:47:10.000
<v Speaker 1>careful what you ask for, Be careful of what you're

0:47:10.000 --> 0:47:13.040
<v Speaker 1>doing there. You want to talk about something that's more

0:47:13.120 --> 0:47:17.520
<v Speaker 1>likely to blow up in your face than somehow create

0:47:17.560 --> 0:47:22.920
<v Speaker 1>political deflection for Trump. It's playing games like this with

0:47:23.040 --> 0:47:27.560
<v Speaker 1>trying to We're trying to target Hillary Clinton in particular.

0:47:28.360 --> 0:47:30.719
<v Speaker 1>Just you know, I know you think she's so unpopular,

0:47:30.760 --> 0:47:35.480
<v Speaker 1>it doesn't matter what you do. I'd watch it. I

0:47:36.000 --> 0:47:40.279
<v Speaker 1>think there's that's something I would be extraordinarily careful with.

0:47:45.600 --> 0:47:47.759
<v Speaker 1>This episode of the Chuck Podcast is brought to you

0:47:47.800 --> 0:47:50.560
<v Speaker 1>by American Financing. Let's be honest, the math just isn't

0:47:50.560 --> 0:47:53.480
<v Speaker 1>adding up lately. Between the grocery store and those skyrocketing

0:47:53.480 --> 0:47:56.239
<v Speaker 1>insurance premiums, even with a steady job, more families are

0:47:56.280 --> 0:47:58.960
<v Speaker 1>being forced to rely on high interest credit cards to

0:47:59.080 --> 0:48:02.280
<v Speaker 1>cover expenses. So if you're a homeowner caught in this cycle,

0:48:02.400 --> 0:48:05.480
<v Speaker 1>carrying balances with interest rates in the twenties, frankly even

0:48:05.520 --> 0:48:07.560
<v Speaker 1>the thirties, it's time to get some relief. Right now,

0:48:07.600 --> 0:48:09.719
<v Speaker 1>mortgage rates are at a three year low, and my

0:48:09.760 --> 0:48:13.200
<v Speaker 1>friends at American Financing are helping homeowners pay off that

0:48:13.400 --> 0:48:17.040
<v Speaker 1>high interest debt at rates in the low fives. Their

0:48:17.160 --> 0:48:20.640
<v Speaker 1>salary based mortgage consultants don't just push loans on you,

0:48:20.680 --> 0:48:24.720
<v Speaker 1>they build exit strategies from debts. On average, they're saving

0:48:24.760 --> 0:48:27.440
<v Speaker 1>their customers eight hundred dollars a month. So if you

0:48:27.480 --> 0:48:30.400
<v Speaker 1>start today, you may even delay the next two mortgage payments.

0:48:30.480 --> 0:48:33.160
<v Speaker 1>There are no upfront fees or obligations. To find out

0:48:33.200 --> 0:48:36.960
<v Speaker 1>how much you can save America's Home for home loans

0:48:37.120 --> 0:48:41.759
<v Speaker 1>is American Financing eight six six eight eight five ten

0:48:41.960 --> 0:48:45.640
<v Speaker 1>eighty one. That's eight six six eight eight five ten

0:48:45.800 --> 0:48:51.759
<v Speaker 1>eighty one or Americanfinancing dot net slash The Chuck Todcast.

0:48:52.080 --> 0:48:57.680
<v Speaker 1>Important disclaimer NMLS one A, two three three four NMLS

0:48:57.960 --> 0:49:01.839
<v Speaker 1>Consumer Access dot Org APR for rates in the five

0:49:01.960 --> 0:49:04.680
<v Speaker 1>start at six point one ninety six percent for well

0:49:04.760 --> 0:49:08.040
<v Speaker 1>qualified buyers. Call eight six six eight eight five one

0:49:08.160 --> 0:49:11.400
<v Speaker 1>zero eight one for details about credit costs and terms,

0:49:11.600 --> 0:49:16.839
<v Speaker 1>or Americanfinancing dot net slash The Chuck Podcast. Having good

0:49:16.880 --> 0:49:20.920
<v Speaker 1>life insurance is incredibly important. I know from personal experience.

0:49:21.160 --> 0:49:23.479
<v Speaker 1>I was sixteen when my father passed away. We didn't

0:49:23.480 --> 0:49:26.520
<v Speaker 1>have any money. He didn't leave us in the best shape.

0:49:26.640 --> 0:49:30.920
<v Speaker 1>My mother single mother, now widow. Myself sixteen trying to

0:49:30.920 --> 0:49:32.520
<v Speaker 1>figure out how am I going to pay for college

0:49:33.040 --> 0:49:36.080
<v Speaker 1>and lo and behold, my dad had one life insurance

0:49:36.080 --> 0:49:39.040
<v Speaker 1>policy that we found wasn't a lot, but it was

0:49:39.080 --> 0:49:42.200
<v Speaker 1>important at the time, and it's why I was able

0:49:42.280 --> 0:49:45.640
<v Speaker 1>to go to college. Little did he know how important

0:49:45.640 --> 0:49:49.480
<v Speaker 1>that would be in that moment. Well, guess what. That's

0:49:49.520 --> 0:49:51.760
<v Speaker 1>why I am here to tell you about Etho's life.

0:49:52.200 --> 0:49:54.560
<v Speaker 1>They can provide you with peace of mind knowing your

0:49:54.600 --> 0:49:57.880
<v Speaker 1>family is protected even if the worst comes to pass.

0:49:58.280 --> 0:50:01.520
<v Speaker 1>Ethos is an online platform that makes getting life insurance

0:50:01.560 --> 0:50:04.640
<v Speaker 1>fast and easy, all designed to protect your family's future

0:50:04.680 --> 0:50:08.200
<v Speaker 1>in minutes, not months. There's no complicated process, and it's

0:50:08.320 --> 0:50:12.520
<v Speaker 1>one hundred percent online. There's no medical exam require you

0:50:12.600 --> 0:50:15.080
<v Speaker 1>just answer a few health questions online. You can get

0:50:15.080 --> 0:50:16.840
<v Speaker 1>a quote in as little as ten minutes, and you

0:50:16.880 --> 0:50:20.600
<v Speaker 1>can get same day coverage without ever leaving your home.

0:50:21.280 --> 0:50:23.160
<v Speaker 1>You can get up to three million dollars in coverage

0:50:23.200 --> 0:50:25.239
<v Speaker 1>and some policies start as low as two dollars a

0:50:25.320 --> 0:50:28.600
<v Speaker 1>day that would be billed monthly. As of March twenty

0:50:28.640 --> 0:50:31.640
<v Speaker 1>twenty five, Business Insider named Ethos the number one no

0:50:31.760 --> 0:50:36.160
<v Speaker 1>medical exam instant life insurance provider. So protect your family

0:50:36.640 --> 0:50:39.440
<v Speaker 1>with life insurance from Ethos. Get your free quoted at

0:50:39.440 --> 0:50:43.720
<v Speaker 1>ethos dot com slash chuck. So again, that's Ethos dot

0:50:43.760 --> 0:50:48.359
<v Speaker 1>com slash chuck. Application times may vary and the rates

0:50:48.400 --> 0:50:51.720
<v Speaker 1>themselves may vary as well, but trust me. Life Insurance

0:50:51.800 --> 0:50:54.480
<v Speaker 1>is something you should really think about it, especially if

0:50:54.520 --> 0:50:59.880
<v Speaker 1>you've got a growing family. By the way, one of

0:50:59.920 --> 0:51:05.120
<v Speaker 1>the things that I wouldn't mind hearing from you the viewers.

0:51:05.160 --> 0:51:08.680
<v Speaker 1>We love suggest booking suggestions. We get plenty of booking

0:51:09.320 --> 0:51:13.239
<v Speaker 1>people throwing stuff our way. But if there are specific

0:51:14.560 --> 0:51:20.480
<v Speaker 1>candidates or individuals or historians you'd like to hear on

0:51:20.520 --> 0:51:24.520
<v Speaker 1>the podcast, don't be shy. Let us know. Ask Chuck

0:51:24.600 --> 0:51:28.160
<v Speaker 1>at thechucktodcast dot com. Yes, the same place that you

0:51:28.239 --> 0:51:32.680
<v Speaker 1>send all your brilliant pieces of email and analysis and

0:51:32.760 --> 0:51:37.680
<v Speaker 1>questions to me that I'd love to read and absorb.

0:51:37.920 --> 0:51:41.480
<v Speaker 1>But please use that address if you've got any other

0:51:41.520 --> 0:51:43.360
<v Speaker 1>folks you'd like to see as My goal is to

0:51:43.400 --> 0:51:46.719
<v Speaker 1>try to between now and the filing deadline for the

0:51:46.800 --> 0:51:49.120
<v Speaker 1>Iowa Caucuses if they are indeed first in the nation

0:51:49.200 --> 0:51:52.560
<v Speaker 1>come January of twenty twenty seven, I hope everybody of

0:51:52.640 --> 0:51:55.360
<v Speaker 1>consequence that's running for president that I get to spend

0:51:55.600 --> 0:51:59.680
<v Speaker 1>thirty to forty five minutes here with us. So with that,

0:52:01.640 --> 0:52:04.719
<v Speaker 1>one quick addendum before I get to the Toddcast time

0:52:04.760 --> 0:52:08.160
<v Speaker 1>Machine event for this week, and that is it's like

0:52:08.200 --> 0:52:11.000
<v Speaker 1>a little we had a little coda to the Washington

0:52:11.000 --> 0:52:16.040
<v Speaker 1>post event. Will Lewis the publisher in name only, I

0:52:16.040 --> 0:52:18.480
<v Speaker 1>guess because he was nowhere to be found at the

0:52:18.480 --> 0:52:20.960
<v Speaker 1>announcement of the layoffs. He was nowhere to be found

0:52:20.960 --> 0:52:24.560
<v Speaker 1>in frankly the last nine months of the newsroom itself.

0:52:25.480 --> 0:52:28.560
<v Speaker 1>A photo showed up of him at the Super Bowl

0:52:29.239 --> 0:52:31.440
<v Speaker 1>at one of the pre parties on the red carpet

0:52:31.440 --> 0:52:35.960
<v Speaker 1>for NFL honors. And let's say that suddenly an email

0:52:36.600 --> 0:52:41.120
<v Speaker 1>resignation statement showed up and a lot of inboxes come Saturday.

0:52:41.440 --> 0:52:44.800
<v Speaker 1>I believe it was Saturday morning that a very abrupt

0:52:44.880 --> 0:52:47.520
<v Speaker 1>he thanked Jeff Bezos and walked away, had nothing to

0:52:47.560 --> 0:52:49.640
<v Speaker 1>say about the journalists that he oversaw for a couple

0:52:49.680 --> 0:52:52.880
<v Speaker 1>of years. So will lewis cementing his place as the

0:52:53.040 --> 0:52:56.240
<v Speaker 1>single worst publisher in the history of the Washington Post.

0:52:56.360 --> 0:53:00.560
<v Speaker 1>So congratulations mister Lewis on that. And probably you know,

0:53:00.920 --> 0:53:05.000
<v Speaker 1>unhire should be seen in journalism circles. It's completely unhirable,

0:53:05.560 --> 0:53:10.560
<v Speaker 1>just completely unhirable to run. To run an enterprise. He might,

0:53:11.040 --> 0:53:13.880
<v Speaker 1>he might have some smart things to say about trend

0:53:13.880 --> 0:53:16.960
<v Speaker 1>lines and what's happening, but a manager of people and

0:53:17.000 --> 0:53:19.440
<v Speaker 1>a leader of people, he is not. Uh, And I

0:53:19.480 --> 0:53:23.799
<v Speaker 1>think that that is obvious. Look, it's it's it is.

0:53:24.120 --> 0:53:27.200
<v Speaker 1>It's really weird to be sort of, you know, our

0:53:27.280 --> 0:53:31.880
<v Speaker 1>fourth day five without essentially without the Washington Post, because

0:53:31.880 --> 0:53:35.080
<v Speaker 1>I know, yes, there's national reporter still doing good work,

0:53:35.120 --> 0:53:37.120
<v Speaker 1>there's a congressional team that's still doing good work, and

0:53:37.160 --> 0:53:40.560
<v Speaker 1>I don't want to I don't want to shit on them, Okay,

0:53:41.080 --> 0:53:44.240
<v Speaker 1>but you know, the Washington Post is going to slowly,

0:53:45.360 --> 0:53:50.520
<v Speaker 1>essentially fade into more is relevant in Washington as Politico,

0:53:50.560 --> 0:53:54.879
<v Speaker 1>which is there's nothing wrong professional professionally, political punch bowl

0:53:54.920 --> 0:53:58.000
<v Speaker 1>relevant professionally, the Washington Post will be relatant as a

0:53:58.120 --> 0:54:00.680
<v Speaker 1>member and a leader of the of the DMV in

0:54:00.719 --> 0:54:06.120
<v Speaker 1>this community, it's over. That's what's dead, and the idea

0:54:06.160 --> 0:54:08.600
<v Speaker 1>that they don't care about local sports, which is just

0:54:08.600 --> 0:54:11.759
<v Speaker 1>such an important part of the community. So it's in

0:54:11.800 --> 0:54:17.240
<v Speaker 1>that vein that I have a you know, sometimes sometimes

0:54:17.239 --> 0:54:19.480
<v Speaker 1>I have interesting business ideas that I don't share with

0:54:19.520 --> 0:54:22.799
<v Speaker 1>you because I'm working on them myself. And then sometimes

0:54:22.920 --> 0:54:26.200
<v Speaker 1>there are things that are above my pay grade, you know,

0:54:27.360 --> 0:54:30.840
<v Speaker 1>and instead feel like something a challenge that should be

0:54:30.880 --> 0:54:35.120
<v Speaker 1>issued publicly. So here's my public challenge to the three

0:54:35.160 --> 0:54:38.320
<v Speaker 1>major sports owners of the Washington, DC market, Mark Lerner,

0:54:38.320 --> 0:54:41.279
<v Speaker 1>who runs the Nationals, Ted Leons's owner of both the

0:54:41.320 --> 0:54:44.400
<v Speaker 1>Caps and the Wizards, and Josh Harris, owner of the

0:54:44.480 --> 0:54:51.240
<v Speaker 1>Washington Commanders. You three have an enormous interest in having

0:54:51.280 --> 0:54:56.480
<v Speaker 1>a local and regional news organization that is trusted, that

0:54:56.640 --> 0:54:59.960
<v Speaker 1>is frankly a bit of a cheerleader to the local

0:55:00.040 --> 0:55:02.480
<v Speaker 1>sports teams, even if they are will every once in

0:55:02.480 --> 0:55:05.719
<v Speaker 1>a while attack all of you for doing crappy things

0:55:05.719 --> 0:55:07.520
<v Speaker 1>as owners every once in a while because we fans

0:55:07.600 --> 0:55:09.840
<v Speaker 1>might get upset at you because we want to spend

0:55:09.880 --> 0:55:12.279
<v Speaker 1>your money in ways that you don't want to spend

0:55:12.320 --> 0:55:15.640
<v Speaker 1>your money. My tongue is I'm going hard in cheek

0:55:15.680 --> 0:55:18.560
<v Speaker 1>here a little bit, but you get my point. But

0:55:18.600 --> 0:55:22.840
<v Speaker 1>you you know, if your teams don't get attention and

0:55:22.880 --> 0:55:25.239
<v Speaker 1>people don't know what you're up to, then maybe you

0:55:25.239 --> 0:55:27.200
<v Speaker 1>have a harder time selling season tickets and maybe have

0:55:27.239 --> 0:55:29.560
<v Speaker 1>a harder time selling single game tickets, maybe have a

0:55:29.600 --> 0:55:34.279
<v Speaker 1>harder time letting people know that Taylor Swift's coming to

0:55:34.360 --> 0:55:40.600
<v Speaker 1>the new RFK or Bad Bunny's coming to the Capitol

0:55:40.600 --> 0:55:46.240
<v Speaker 1>One Arena. And I say this because both Josh Harris

0:55:46.280 --> 0:55:48.480
<v Speaker 1>and Ted Leones is in particular. I don't know the

0:55:48.520 --> 0:55:52.040
<v Speaker 1>history of Mark Learner's investments, but both have invested in

0:55:52.400 --> 0:55:54.680
<v Speaker 1>media organizations in the past. Josh Harris has been a

0:55:55.560 --> 0:55:59.239
<v Speaker 1>funder and has made money off of investments on new

0:55:59.320 --> 0:56:01.600
<v Speaker 1>startups and the By the way, I want to throw

0:56:01.640 --> 0:56:05.839
<v Speaker 1>my uh Mark iin into this conversation. He's another sort

0:56:05.840 --> 0:56:08.000
<v Speaker 1>of major player in the Washington sports market. He's one

0:56:08.000 --> 0:56:11.759
<v Speaker 1>of the I think minority owners and investors and the

0:56:11.760 --> 0:56:15.120
<v Speaker 1>commanders owns. I think he's very involved in the in

0:56:15.120 --> 0:56:18.040
<v Speaker 1>the professional tennis league that's here, and I believe in

0:56:18.080 --> 0:56:20.279
<v Speaker 1>some of the soccer franchise as well. So and he's

0:56:20.320 --> 0:56:23.160
<v Speaker 1>also very much a what I'd say is a member

0:56:23.160 --> 0:56:26.799
<v Speaker 1>of the Washington community and in some ways of more

0:56:26.880 --> 0:56:31.000
<v Speaker 1>vocal than some of his other fellow sports investors there.

0:56:31.040 --> 0:56:33.440
<v Speaker 1>So I should have included Mark iin into this, but

0:56:34.480 --> 0:56:36.879
<v Speaker 1>I'm saying it publicly. You guys know how to get

0:56:36.880 --> 0:56:38.759
<v Speaker 1>a hold of me, So I'm happy to help out

0:56:38.800 --> 0:56:41.200
<v Speaker 1>in any way possible. But I think it's your your

0:56:41.640 --> 0:56:46.480
<v Speaker 1>best interests to come help fund. Whether it's d MV today,

0:56:46.920 --> 0:56:51.200
<v Speaker 1>maybe it's a sports vertical at first, sports local culture.

0:56:51.719 --> 0:56:58.000
<v Speaker 1>The point is, you guys have the resources to do this.

0:57:00.520 --> 0:57:02.560
<v Speaker 1>Don't hire Will Lewis to do it. That would be

0:57:02.600 --> 0:57:07.920
<v Speaker 1>my number one piece of advice. But beyond that, I

0:57:07.960 --> 0:57:10.920
<v Speaker 1>hope you have an open door for whether it's myself,

0:57:10.960 --> 0:57:13.480
<v Speaker 1>whether it's my friend Kara Swisher. And speaking of Kara Swisher,

0:57:13.520 --> 0:57:16.000
<v Speaker 1>she's my guest this week on my Newsphere program Sunday

0:57:16.040 --> 0:57:18.360
<v Speaker 1>Night with Chuck Todd. And I'll just put it this way.

0:57:19.680 --> 0:57:23.320
<v Speaker 1>If you enjoy hearing sentences that include Jeff Bezos in

0:57:23.360 --> 0:57:25.720
<v Speaker 1>the F word, you're gonna love this Kara Swisher interview.

0:57:27.120 --> 0:57:29.320
<v Speaker 1>She doesn't hold anything back. She's got a lot of

0:57:29.320 --> 0:57:32.200
<v Speaker 1>strong opinions, and she knows these people better than any

0:57:32.440 --> 0:57:34.760
<v Speaker 1>other person. And by the way, if you want to

0:57:34.800 --> 0:57:37.360
<v Speaker 1>know for care, if it's personal, Yes, it is her

0:57:37.400 --> 0:57:43.320
<v Speaker 1>first job, mailroom inside the Washington Post, so it's personal

0:57:43.360 --> 0:57:45.919
<v Speaker 1>for her. But she has a lot of smart ideas here.

0:57:45.960 --> 0:57:49.040
<v Speaker 1>And I think we and it's not just about the

0:57:49.080 --> 0:57:51.280
<v Speaker 1>Washington Post that we spent We talk about the tech

0:57:51.320 --> 0:57:54.240
<v Speaker 1>titans in general and whether there are any good guys

0:57:54.320 --> 0:57:57.200
<v Speaker 1>in Silicon Valley. Here's the good news. She thinks there's

0:57:57.200 --> 0:57:59.520
<v Speaker 1>at least one good guy there. I'm not going to

0:57:59.560 --> 0:58:03.040
<v Speaker 1>tell you is here. Go check it out on newsphere.

0:58:03.280 --> 0:58:06.080
<v Speaker 1>So just wanted to do that little coda on the

0:58:06.160 --> 0:58:08.000
<v Speaker 1>Washington Post. Given how much time I spent on it

0:58:08.080 --> 0:58:13.800
<v Speaker 1>last week, it's still pretty painful to realize that what

0:58:14.000 --> 0:58:15.800
<v Speaker 1>just happened to the Washington Post, and then to see

0:58:15.800 --> 0:58:18.440
<v Speaker 1>the will Lewis thing. I mean, it was deserved, right.

0:58:18.520 --> 0:58:23.400
<v Speaker 1>Whether Bezos fired him out of just a pr pr necessity,

0:58:24.120 --> 0:58:26.480
<v Speaker 1>it was necessary. It gives Matt Murray a chance at

0:58:26.600 --> 0:58:31.200
<v Speaker 1>maybe rallying the remaining troops there. And look, I'll say

0:58:31.200 --> 0:58:35.040
<v Speaker 1>what I said last week, I feel for him on this,

0:58:35.160 --> 0:58:36.880
<v Speaker 1>and you know, some of you look, he made his

0:58:36.880 --> 0:58:43.160
<v Speaker 1>own bed, so you know, yes, but he's there to

0:58:43.240 --> 0:58:48.040
<v Speaker 1>execute strategy. And the fact that the owner and the

0:58:48.080 --> 0:58:50.680
<v Speaker 1>publisher didn't have the guts to be the face of

0:58:50.720 --> 0:58:53.240
<v Speaker 1>this tells you who they are, tells you a lot

0:58:53.240 --> 0:58:57.360
<v Speaker 1>about their character. And that's what I think has been

0:58:57.600 --> 0:58:59.800
<v Speaker 1>the most damning thing about all of this. All Right,

0:59:01.080 --> 0:59:10.680
<v Speaker 1>let's go back into time. It's time machine time. So

0:59:11.240 --> 0:59:14.560
<v Speaker 1>where are we going in history? I kind of want

0:59:14.600 --> 0:59:17.480
<v Speaker 1>sound effects, right, we'll get there. So where are we going?

0:59:17.560 --> 0:59:20.959
<v Speaker 1>We're going to go to February eleventh, nineteen seventy nine,

0:59:21.760 --> 0:59:26.760
<v Speaker 1>It's the day the Iranian monarchy collapsed. The Shaw's government fell,

0:59:26.880 --> 0:59:30.200
<v Speaker 1>military declared neutrality in Iran, and a revolution that had

0:59:30.200 --> 0:59:32.919
<v Speaker 1>been building for more than a century finally broke through.

0:59:33.480 --> 0:59:36.120
<v Speaker 1>What followed was the creation of the Islamic Republic and

0:59:36.200 --> 0:59:41.040
<v Speaker 1>authoritarian theocracy, one of the most consequential ruptures in US

0:59:41.160 --> 0:59:45.480
<v Speaker 1>foreign policy, still shaping the Middle East today, global energy markets,

0:59:45.520 --> 0:59:50.200
<v Speaker 1>and American politics. And as questions once again swirl about

0:59:50.240 --> 0:59:55.400
<v Speaker 1>the future of Iran's regime, it's worth remembering something clearly

0:59:55.480 --> 0:59:58.080
<v Speaker 1>at the outset as we go into this time machine.

0:59:58.080 --> 1:00:00.840
<v Speaker 1>The Iranian Revolution did not come out of nowhere, and

1:00:00.920 --> 1:00:04.280
<v Speaker 1>America was not a bystander in it all right. So

1:00:04.360 --> 1:00:07.720
<v Speaker 1>to understand how we got to February nineteen seventy nine

1:00:07.880 --> 1:00:12.640
<v Speaker 1>and the Ayatola Khamane becoming essentially a dictator of Iran,

1:00:13.200 --> 1:00:16.080
<v Speaker 1>we have to go back a lot further. Iran didn't

1:00:16.120 --> 1:00:19.200
<v Speaker 1>suddenly appear in the twentieth century. For thousands of years,

1:00:19.240 --> 1:00:21.320
<v Speaker 1>of course, it was known to the outside world as Persian,

1:00:21.760 --> 1:00:27.400
<v Speaker 1>one of the oldest continuous state traditions on Earth, and

1:00:27.440 --> 1:00:30.200
<v Speaker 1>the monarchy in Persia was not some modern invention either.

1:00:30.320 --> 1:00:32.520
<v Speaker 1>By the time of World War one. Iran had been

1:00:32.600 --> 1:00:37.720
<v Speaker 1>ruled by kings for centuries, most recently under the Kajar dynasty,

1:00:38.360 --> 1:00:41.760
<v Speaker 1>which took power in seventeen ninety four. In fact, even

1:00:41.800 --> 1:00:45.480
<v Speaker 1>the title Sha itself matters here. It's not Islamic. It's

1:00:45.480 --> 1:00:48.800
<v Speaker 1>a Persian word, ancient Persian, and it dates back more

1:00:48.840 --> 1:00:53.920
<v Speaker 1>than twenty five hundred years. The fuller imperior title is Shahanshah,

1:00:54.400 --> 1:00:59.040
<v Speaker 1>which literally means king of kings. So when Iranians overthrew

1:00:59.080 --> 1:01:02.680
<v Speaker 1>the Shaw eighteen seventy nine, they weren't just rejecting a

1:01:02.720 --> 1:01:05.760
<v Speaker 1>modern autocrat, and by the way, that last Shaw was

1:01:05.840 --> 1:01:08.600
<v Speaker 1>an autocrat, I'll get to that. They were rejecting a

1:01:08.640 --> 1:01:13.160
<v Speaker 1>pre Islamic royal tradition that stretched back to the antiquity era.

1:01:13.880 --> 1:01:17.040
<v Speaker 1>This wasn't just political upheaval. It was a civilization break.

1:01:17.880 --> 1:01:21.320
<v Speaker 1>In nineteen thirty five, Iran's ruler asked foreign governments to

1:01:21.480 --> 1:01:25.440
<v Speaker 1>stop using Persia and adopt the name Iran instead. It

1:01:25.480 --> 1:01:29.200
<v Speaker 1>was a nationalist gesture meant to assert sovereignty and create

1:01:29.200 --> 1:01:32.800
<v Speaker 1>a modern identity. It wasn't the creation of a new country,

1:01:32.840 --> 1:01:34.560
<v Speaker 1>but it was a demand to be seen on its

1:01:34.600 --> 1:01:39.479
<v Speaker 1>own terms. So we all need that little history lesson

1:01:39.480 --> 1:01:41.840
<v Speaker 1>every now and then, So now we place a rain

1:01:41.880 --> 1:01:44.120
<v Speaker 1>into its regional context and just sort of a little

1:01:44.120 --> 1:01:47.160
<v Speaker 1>bit of the backstory here on Iran. In the early

1:01:47.160 --> 1:01:50.440
<v Speaker 1>twentieth century, during World War One, Persia was officially neutral,

1:01:51.440 --> 1:01:54.640
<v Speaker 1>but neutrality never did protect it as a country. Its

1:01:54.720 --> 1:01:58.320
<v Speaker 1>territory was repeatedly violated by the Russians, the British, and

1:01:58.400 --> 1:02:01.640
<v Speaker 1>at times even the Ottoman forces. Persia was never part

1:02:01.680 --> 1:02:04.160
<v Speaker 1>of the Ottoman Empire. That's an important note. Historically it

1:02:04.200 --> 1:02:07.880
<v Speaker 1>was often the chief rival to the Ottomans, particularly along

1:02:07.960 --> 1:02:11.920
<v Speaker 1>sectarian lines. We had the Sunni Ottoman rule versus the

1:02:11.960 --> 1:02:16.760
<v Speaker 1>Shia Persian identity right Sunni Shia, something that's been there

1:02:16.840 --> 1:02:20.520
<v Speaker 1>from nearly the beginning of Islam. The lesson Iranians absorbed

1:02:20.560 --> 1:02:23.760
<v Speaker 1>from World War One, though, was a harsh one. Neutrality

1:02:24.320 --> 1:02:27.600
<v Speaker 1>does not stop great powers from using your country as

1:02:27.640 --> 1:02:31.760
<v Speaker 1>a chessboard. So at the same time, the Ottoman Empire

1:02:31.800 --> 1:02:33.400
<v Speaker 1>collapsed at the end of the war, and it gave

1:02:33.440 --> 1:02:39.480
<v Speaker 1>birth largely through a European mandate system new states like Iraq, Syria,

1:02:39.800 --> 1:02:43.800
<v Speaker 1>and Lebanon. Right. Iraq, for example, emerged as a British

1:02:43.880 --> 1:02:47.360
<v Speaker 1>backed monarchy in the early nineteen twenties, and it gained

1:02:47.400 --> 1:02:52.080
<v Speaker 1>full independence in nineteen thirty two. So Iran is sitting

1:02:52.080 --> 1:02:56.439
<v Speaker 1>there watching its neighbors be invented by outside powers while

1:02:56.480 --> 1:03:00.000
<v Speaker 1>struggling to preserve its own independence in a world dominated

1:03:00.280 --> 1:03:06.800
<v Speaker 1>by empires. What's interesting is this Iran did not passively

1:03:06.880 --> 1:03:10.680
<v Speaker 1>accept monarchy as destiny. In fact, just the opposite. In

1:03:10.760 --> 1:03:17.240
<v Speaker 1>nineteen oh six, Persia experienced a constitutional revolution. It produced

1:03:17.240 --> 1:03:22.360
<v Speaker 1>a written constitution, a parliament. The majills, I hope I

1:03:22.400 --> 1:03:26.280
<v Speaker 1>get that jealous and I have no doubt, and I

1:03:27.640 --> 1:03:30.400
<v Speaker 1>will mess up some of these pronunciations of some of

1:03:30.440 --> 1:03:33.400
<v Speaker 1>these Persian words. My apologies, but essentially it was a

1:03:33.400 --> 1:03:36.960
<v Speaker 1>parliament and limits on royal authority. This was one of

1:03:36.960 --> 1:03:39.720
<v Speaker 1>the earliest constitutional movements in the Middle East. There's a

1:03:39.800 --> 1:03:44.800
<v Speaker 1>real small d democratic tradition inside of Iran. Iran had

1:03:44.800 --> 1:03:49.240
<v Speaker 1>a They did this decades before many of its neighbors,

1:03:50.040 --> 1:03:53.480
<v Speaker 1>but it was fragile. Iranian politics became defined by a

1:03:53.480 --> 1:03:59.960
<v Speaker 1>persistent tension monarchy, secular reformers, religious authorities, and foreign powers,

1:04:00.360 --> 1:04:03.400
<v Speaker 1>and they were all always pulling around in different direction.

1:04:04.160 --> 1:04:08.320
<v Speaker 1>Tension has never disappeared. It simply evolves in different ways

1:04:08.400 --> 1:04:10.840
<v Speaker 1>over times. And we're seeing it play out at the moment.

1:04:11.600 --> 1:04:14.800
<v Speaker 1>So in the nineteen twenties you had Resa Shah pa Lavi.

1:04:15.920 --> 1:04:20.520
<v Speaker 1>He sees power and eventually crowned himself. Shaw His project

1:04:20.600 --> 1:04:27.480
<v Speaker 1>was modernization, centralizing the state, building infrastructure, weakening the religious authority,

1:04:27.560 --> 1:04:34.240
<v Speaker 1>clerical authority, and enforcing secularism. But it was modernization from above,

1:04:34.440 --> 1:04:40.960
<v Speaker 1>enforced by coercion. Parliamentary democracy was weakened, political pluralism shrank,

1:04:42.160 --> 1:04:45.440
<v Speaker 1>the monarchy reasserted itself as the center of gravity. So

1:04:45.960 --> 1:04:47.840
<v Speaker 1>we can look at it and say, well, great, they

1:04:47.840 --> 1:04:51.640
<v Speaker 1>were modernized, they were westernizing, but they were essentially beating

1:04:51.720 --> 1:04:56.160
<v Speaker 1>people into modernizing. Right. It was not a democratic move

1:04:56.240 --> 1:05:00.760
<v Speaker 1>to modernization, and it meant that Resia sh Shaw's project

1:05:00.840 --> 1:05:04.480
<v Speaker 1>also came across as nationalists. He was attempting to reduce

1:05:04.520 --> 1:05:08.560
<v Speaker 1>British and Russian influence. Of course, that independence would not last.

1:05:10.480 --> 1:05:13.160
<v Speaker 1>The most important Hinge point before in nineteen seventy nine

1:05:13.200 --> 1:05:17.360
<v Speaker 1>comes in the early fifties. By then Iran had another Shaw,

1:05:17.720 --> 1:05:22.800
<v Speaker 1>Riza Shaw's son, Mohammed Riza Pahlavi, and a democratic chosen

1:05:22.840 --> 1:05:27.320
<v Speaker 1>prime minister by the name of Mohammed Mozadek. Well, Mozadek

1:05:27.520 --> 1:05:31.440
<v Speaker 1>the prime minister moved to nationalize Iran's oil industry. At

1:05:31.480 --> 1:05:33.680
<v Speaker 1>the time, it was an attempt to challenge the British

1:05:33.680 --> 1:05:40.080
<v Speaker 1>dominance and over their oil economy and asserting their own sovereignty. Well,

1:05:40.160 --> 1:05:44.400
<v Speaker 1>guess what the Brits panicked called Warfares intensified and in

1:05:44.480 --> 1:05:48.439
<v Speaker 1>nineteen fifty three, the United States and the UK back

1:05:48.520 --> 1:05:52.920
<v Speaker 1>the coup that removed the prime minister. So here's what

1:05:52.960 --> 1:05:56.800
<v Speaker 1>happened next. The coup didn't just restore the Shaw, it

1:05:56.880 --> 1:06:02.000
<v Speaker 1>also transformed him from a constitutional monarch into the central

1:06:02.080 --> 1:06:05.720
<v Speaker 1>pillar of the state. And so yes, the United States

1:06:05.720 --> 1:06:09.840
<v Speaker 1>effectively helped rip up a fragile parliamentary democracy in favor

1:06:09.880 --> 1:06:13.880
<v Speaker 1>of a more centralized, more authoritarian and at the time,

1:06:13.920 --> 1:06:18.000
<v Speaker 1>because this was the Cold War, a more pro Western monarchy.

1:06:18.840 --> 1:06:21.680
<v Speaker 1>It was what was in America's national interests that mattered

1:06:21.720 --> 1:06:25.640
<v Speaker 1>more than what was in the small d democracy interests.

1:06:26.160 --> 1:06:28.400
<v Speaker 1>This is an important point to understand. This is why

1:06:29.280 --> 1:06:31.520
<v Speaker 1>a lot of things we did in the fifties and

1:06:31.640 --> 1:06:34.040
<v Speaker 1>sixties in the name of the Cold War and dealing

1:06:34.040 --> 1:06:37.640
<v Speaker 1>with the Soviets created a lot of anti americanism around

1:06:37.720 --> 1:06:41.280
<v Speaker 1>the world. This is one of them. So from Washington's

1:06:41.280 --> 1:06:43.840
<v Speaker 1>perspective at the time, right, Hey, this was all about

1:06:43.840 --> 1:06:49.320
<v Speaker 1>stability and anti communism, pure and symbol From Tehran's perspective

1:06:49.400 --> 1:06:52.960
<v Speaker 1>and the perspective of quite a few individuals, it was

1:06:52.960 --> 1:06:55.760
<v Speaker 1>about lost sovereignty. So from that moment on, the Shah

1:06:55.760 --> 1:06:59.920
<v Speaker 1>in the United States became politically intertwined in the Iranian imagination.

1:07:00.520 --> 1:07:05.400
<v Speaker 1>Opposition to the Shah increasingly meant opposition to America. And

1:07:05.440 --> 1:07:08.400
<v Speaker 1>this is where the long fuze toward nineteen seventy nine

1:07:08.520 --> 1:07:13.720
<v Speaker 1>is let the Shaw modernized rapidly, expanding education, advancing women's rights,

1:07:13.720 --> 1:07:17.440
<v Speaker 1>pouring oil wealth into development. All that's good stuff. But

1:07:17.520 --> 1:07:21.280
<v Speaker 1>the modernization was paired with repression. There was censorship, a

1:07:21.360 --> 1:07:25.920
<v Speaker 1>powerful secret police. They crushed descent, and they were really

1:07:25.960 --> 1:07:29.240
<v Speaker 1>tough on those that were overly religious. And it all

1:07:29.280 --> 1:07:33.800
<v Speaker 1>came with visible American back in Regionally, Orion stood apart

1:07:33.920 --> 1:07:37.160
<v Speaker 1>because while you had Arab states experiencing cups and military

1:07:37.240 --> 1:07:40.040
<v Speaker 1>rule and pan Arab nationalism all over the place, Egypt

1:07:40.120 --> 1:07:44.320
<v Speaker 1>under Nassar Syrian, Iraq under the Baptist regimes, Iran was

1:07:44.400 --> 1:07:48.280
<v Speaker 1>actually the pillar of America's Middle East strategy in the

1:07:48.320 --> 1:07:54.120
<v Speaker 1>Gulf region. That alignment bought power, and it also planted

1:07:54.120 --> 1:07:57.640
<v Speaker 1>some rage. And this is the environment in which a

1:07:57.680 --> 1:08:03.720
<v Speaker 1>man named Ayatola rulej Hala Komene. Yes that Komenee emerges

1:08:03.760 --> 1:08:09.480
<v Speaker 1>as a symbol of the resistance. Here's an important clarification

1:08:09.520 --> 1:08:15.160
<v Speaker 1>in history. Komene did not flee Iran. Comeni was arrested, released,

1:08:15.360 --> 1:08:18.400
<v Speaker 1>and then banished from the country. In the early sixties,

1:08:18.479 --> 1:08:22.639
<v Speaker 1>Comene openly denounced the Shaw's reforms and crucially attacked Iran's

1:08:22.680 --> 1:08:26.519
<v Speaker 1>relationship with the United States, particularly laws that granted US

1:08:26.640 --> 1:08:31.080
<v Speaker 1>personnel legal immunity inside of Iran. Remember this came up

1:08:31.080 --> 1:08:35.640
<v Speaker 1>again during our in the attempt to build a democracy

1:08:35.640 --> 1:08:40.960
<v Speaker 1>in Iraq that giving immunity to outside forces is never

1:08:41.000 --> 1:08:44.679
<v Speaker 1>popular domestically wherever you are. Well. The Shaw had options

1:08:44.680 --> 1:08:46.800
<v Speaker 1>and what to do with Komene. He could imprison him.

1:08:47.000 --> 1:08:49.400
<v Speaker 1>He could have executed him, or he could have silenced

1:08:49.439 --> 1:08:53.040
<v Speaker 1>him another way. Executing him risk turning him into a martyr.

1:08:53.840 --> 1:08:56.479
<v Speaker 1>So the Shaw decided to expel. First it was to Turkey,

1:08:57.439 --> 1:08:59.640
<v Speaker 1>then it was to Iraq, and eventually he'd end up

1:08:59.640 --> 1:09:04.040
<v Speaker 1>in France. Well, exile was a mistake because while exile

1:09:04.120 --> 1:09:07.519
<v Speaker 1>was meant as an attempt to neutralize komene Instead, he

1:09:07.600 --> 1:09:12.599
<v Speaker 1>kind of professionalized his movement and gave him gave him

1:09:12.640 --> 1:09:17.400
<v Speaker 1>more rhetorical power from Paris. In exile, Komeney gained something

1:09:17.439 --> 1:09:20.840
<v Speaker 1>no opposition figure inside Iran could safely have had at

1:09:20.840 --> 1:09:25.360
<v Speaker 1>the time, global media access without fear of arrest. So

1:09:25.439 --> 1:09:27.960
<v Speaker 1>he unifies the opposition, and there was a by the

1:09:28.000 --> 1:09:30.960
<v Speaker 1>way the opposition in Iran was dispersed. Here wasn't just

1:09:31.640 --> 1:09:36.920
<v Speaker 1>the theocrats that were against him, right, So Coomane unifies

1:09:36.960 --> 1:09:39.400
<v Speaker 1>the opposition and he frames it as a resistance not

1:09:39.479 --> 1:09:43.000
<v Speaker 1>just on religious terms, but also moral terms, and he

1:09:43.080 --> 1:09:48.439
<v Speaker 1>positioned clerical rule as authentic national liberation. So on February first,

1:09:48.520 --> 1:09:53.240
<v Speaker 1>nineteen seventy nine, Comeni returns to Tehran to thousands of

1:09:53.320 --> 1:09:57.040
<v Speaker 1>cheering crowds. Ten days later his February eleventh, and the

1:09:57.080 --> 1:10:00.360
<v Speaker 1>monarchy officially collapses. The revolution that toppled the SHAW at

1:10:00.360 --> 1:10:03.920
<v Speaker 1>the moment was broad based. There were secular liberals, there

1:10:03.960 --> 1:10:10.320
<v Speaker 1>were leftists, students, merchants, clerics. But the revolution didn't end

1:10:10.680 --> 1:10:14.479
<v Speaker 1>when the regimes fall. They end when power consolidates, and

1:10:14.520 --> 1:10:19.040
<v Speaker 1>the most organized faction was the clerical one, and they won.

1:10:19.760 --> 1:10:22.040
<v Speaker 1>So what followed was not just a change of rulers,

1:10:22.240 --> 1:10:25.839
<v Speaker 1>but a new governing model. They called it an Islamic republic,

1:10:26.600 --> 1:10:30.280
<v Speaker 1>a theocracy fused with state power, something the region and

1:10:30.320 --> 1:10:36.040
<v Speaker 1>the world actually had never seen before. Now you may

1:10:36.080 --> 1:10:38.800
<v Speaker 1>be wondering when did the hostage crisis begin. So, the

1:10:38.920 --> 1:10:42.800
<v Speaker 1>US embassy hostage crisis actually didn't happen immediately with the

1:10:42.800 --> 1:10:45.200
<v Speaker 1>start of the revolution in February of seventy nine. It

1:10:45.240 --> 1:10:48.080
<v Speaker 1>came nine months later, in November of seventy nine. But

1:10:48.160 --> 1:10:51.120
<v Speaker 1>it flowed directly from everything that came before, memories of

1:10:51.160 --> 1:10:56.080
<v Speaker 1>fifty three, fear of American interference and the revolutionary need

1:10:56.160 --> 1:10:58.639
<v Speaker 1>to define itself against an external enemy, and the United

1:10:58.680 --> 1:11:01.680
<v Speaker 1>States was an easy target because of our history with

1:11:01.800 --> 1:11:05.000
<v Speaker 1>the country, and from that moment on US Iran relations

1:11:05.040 --> 1:11:09.559
<v Speaker 1>froze into hostility. So what lessons should we take away

1:11:09.560 --> 1:11:11.400
<v Speaker 1>from this, Well, we're in the middle of something here

1:11:11.400 --> 1:11:14.960
<v Speaker 1>that we may help foment another revolution in Iran. We

1:11:14.960 --> 1:11:17.200
<v Speaker 1>may be more active on this one, as active as

1:11:17.200 --> 1:11:18.960
<v Speaker 1>we were in nineteen fifty three. Now this time we

1:11:19.000 --> 1:11:21.000
<v Speaker 1>may be on the side of the people. We were

1:11:21.000 --> 1:11:22.559
<v Speaker 1>not on the side of the people in fifty three.

1:11:23.160 --> 1:11:24.400
<v Speaker 1>We were not on the side of the people in

1:11:24.439 --> 1:11:26.439
<v Speaker 1>seventy nine. This time we might be on the side

1:11:26.479 --> 1:11:28.599
<v Speaker 1>of the people. That's the one thing that's different here,

1:11:28.880 --> 1:11:31.760
<v Speaker 1>and maybe that means a different outcome, But it is

1:11:31.800 --> 1:11:36.640
<v Speaker 1>a warning about foreign intervention, right, and modernization without legitimacy,

1:11:36.800 --> 1:11:40.280
<v Speaker 1>and what happens when democracy is sacrificed for stability. And

1:11:40.320 --> 1:11:42.360
<v Speaker 1>in fact, when you hear the story of the Shah

1:11:42.360 --> 1:11:44.680
<v Speaker 1>and the fifties and sixties, I can't help but think

1:11:44.680 --> 1:11:48.479
<v Speaker 1>of NBS in Saudi Arabia. Right, Oh, hey, there's good news,

1:11:48.520 --> 1:11:51.800
<v Speaker 1>he's modernizing, he's given women rights. But at the same time,

1:11:51.800 --> 1:11:56.360
<v Speaker 1>there's still censorship. Right, there's still very little, you know,

1:11:56.400 --> 1:12:01.160
<v Speaker 1>there's still terrible human rights violations, particularly when anybody violates

1:12:01.479 --> 1:12:04.880
<v Speaker 1>the law. So it is there's a lot of lessons

1:12:04.920 --> 1:12:07.880
<v Speaker 1>to take away from this So America. We can't say

1:12:07.960 --> 1:12:10.880
<v Speaker 1>it created the Iranian revolution alone, but it did help

1:12:10.960 --> 1:12:14.479
<v Speaker 1>destroy the alternative that might have prevented it. And that's

1:12:14.479 --> 1:12:16.080
<v Speaker 1>the hardest left in them all. When you weaken a

1:12:16.120 --> 1:12:20.439
<v Speaker 1>democracy to protect your own interests. We actively weakened a

1:12:20.479 --> 1:12:26.720
<v Speaker 1>democracy in nineteen fifty three. You don't eliminate the instability,

1:12:26.840 --> 1:12:32.160
<v Speaker 1>you simply delay it. So as we decide how involved,

1:12:32.160 --> 1:12:35.679
<v Speaker 1>we're going to get and what's happening in Iran. And

1:12:35.760 --> 1:12:38.600
<v Speaker 1>you know, look, I look at you. I think that

1:12:38.920 --> 1:12:44.000
<v Speaker 1>whenever we're on the side a small d democracy, that

1:12:44.120 --> 1:12:46.599
<v Speaker 1>usually ends up at a better place than when we're

1:12:46.640 --> 1:12:49.160
<v Speaker 1>just on the side of helping somebody who's just simply

1:12:49.760 --> 1:12:52.880
<v Speaker 1>on our side in a larger fight against some other

1:12:53.080 --> 1:12:57.680
<v Speaker 1>foreign power. And the Cold War created those types of relationships.

1:12:58.040 --> 1:13:01.480
<v Speaker 1>The fear of China is creating those type transactional relationships.

1:13:01.840 --> 1:13:05.120
<v Speaker 1>But these transactional relationships, and this is right. Donald Trump

1:13:05.200 --> 1:13:07.360
<v Speaker 1>wants to make America. You know, when he talks about

1:13:07.400 --> 1:13:09.519
<v Speaker 1>making America great again, he wants to go back to

1:13:09.720 --> 1:13:18.720
<v Speaker 1>nineteen fifty style kind of imperialistic like foreign policy approach, right,

1:13:19.439 --> 1:13:22.000
<v Speaker 1>and all of that bitness in the ass in Latin America,

1:13:22.400 --> 1:13:25.080
<v Speaker 1>all of this is bitness in the ass in the

1:13:25.080 --> 1:13:29.960
<v Speaker 1>Middle East. Transactional politics without some sort of small the

1:13:30.200 --> 1:13:35.680
<v Speaker 1>democratic moral code is never going to create long term

1:13:35.720 --> 1:13:40.080
<v Speaker 1>stability or security for us here in the United States.

1:13:40.520 --> 1:13:53.240
<v Speaker 1>So with that, there's your time machine. All right, let's

1:13:53.240 --> 1:13:59.240
<v Speaker 1>get to some questions. Ask Chuck, if Trump continues to

1:13:59.280 --> 1:14:01.080
<v Speaker 1>claim you when the twenty twenty election, wouldn't that make

1:14:01.080 --> 1:14:05.280
<v Speaker 1>the potential twenty twenty four run unconstitutional two determinants. I

1:14:05.280 --> 1:14:07.320
<v Speaker 1>love how you're thinking. If you somehow approved he was

1:14:07.680 --> 1:14:09.760
<v Speaker 1>the rightful winner in twenty twenty, wouldn't that undermine the

1:14:09.800 --> 1:14:12.000
<v Speaker 1>legality of a future term and even weaken his legal

1:14:12.040 --> 1:14:14.439
<v Speaker 1>protections side to the presidency just seems like a self

1:14:14.479 --> 1:14:19.640
<v Speaker 1>defeating argument. You know, this reminds me of a of

1:14:19.680 --> 1:14:22.800
<v Speaker 1>a of a rule I used to have I meet

1:14:22.840 --> 1:14:25.000
<v Speaker 1>the press meetings with my staff, when we have these

1:14:25.080 --> 1:14:28.920
<v Speaker 1>daily meetings about the editorial day, I'd say we've banned

1:14:29.080 --> 1:14:36.320
<v Speaker 1>logic in the Trump era. And because what you're making,

1:14:36.520 --> 1:14:40.640
<v Speaker 1>you're taking a news story and applying logic to it,

1:14:40.680 --> 1:14:44.000
<v Speaker 1>and say, well, doesn't this mean this Donald Trump has

1:14:44.080 --> 1:14:48.000
<v Speaker 1>never allowed logic to get in the way of a

1:14:48.040 --> 1:14:51.320
<v Speaker 1>good narrative, right of a good owned the libs mean

1:14:51.560 --> 1:14:56.439
<v Speaker 1>of a good attempt at not having to admit defeat right.

1:14:56.920 --> 1:15:03.639
<v Speaker 1>And so everything you're saying is correct. But that isn't

1:15:03.680 --> 1:15:06.000
<v Speaker 1>what he's up to here, right, We know what he's

1:15:06.160 --> 1:15:09.880
<v Speaker 1>really up to here. This is just continuing to try

1:15:09.880 --> 1:15:17.480
<v Speaker 1>to continuing to try to sort of undermine more legitimacy

1:15:17.479 --> 1:15:20.439
<v Speaker 1>of more institutions, and the more institutions I mean, if

1:15:20.439 --> 1:15:24.479
<v Speaker 1>he is able to fully undermine the entire election system,

1:15:24.479 --> 1:15:27.479
<v Speaker 1>which is what he's attempting to do here with twenty twenty,

1:15:28.880 --> 1:15:33.840
<v Speaker 1>then everything he would do to question the midterms and

1:15:33.920 --> 1:15:40.920
<v Speaker 1>anything like that becomes then natural or normalized because of

1:15:40.920 --> 1:15:42.559
<v Speaker 1>what he's done with twenty twenty. So this is what

1:15:42.600 --> 1:15:45.439
<v Speaker 1>makes what he's doing so dangerous. Here. He's trying to

1:15:45.479 --> 1:15:49.599
<v Speaker 1>sort of legitimize interfering with future elections, right, and he's

1:15:49.720 --> 1:15:54.360
<v Speaker 1>desperate to try to find even you know, even the

1:15:54.400 --> 1:15:58.479
<v Speaker 1>illusion of evidence to reinforce his beliefs about what happened

1:15:58.520 --> 1:16:03.000
<v Speaker 1>twenty twenty. And they look, it's clear they're manufacturing pretext here.

1:16:02.160 --> 1:16:07.479
<v Speaker 1>They have not legitimized a single fact. I mean, you

1:16:07.560 --> 1:16:11.200
<v Speaker 1>go to this about twenty twenty. He's only gone after Georgia.

1:16:11.280 --> 1:16:14.240
<v Speaker 1>By the way, let's I've gone in another place. Let's

1:16:14.240 --> 1:16:17.360
<v Speaker 1>say he magically somehow figures out that he won Georgia,

1:16:18.960 --> 1:16:20.960
<v Speaker 1>he still doesn't have enough electoral votes to prove that

1:16:21.000 --> 1:16:23.880
<v Speaker 1>he won in twenty twenty. There's still other states. He

1:16:23.920 --> 1:16:25.840
<v Speaker 1>hasn't been able to find the votes in Arizona, he

1:16:25.840 --> 1:16:27.479
<v Speaker 1>hasn't been able to find the votes in Nevada. He

1:16:27.479 --> 1:16:29.120
<v Speaker 1>hasn't be able to find the votes in Wisconsin, he

1:16:29.120 --> 1:16:30.680
<v Speaker 1>hasn't been able to find the votes in Michigan, he

1:16:30.720 --> 1:16:34.120
<v Speaker 1>hasn't made to find the votes in Pennsylvania. So but

1:16:34.200 --> 1:16:37.040
<v Speaker 1>again that's logic. This is not about logic, right, I mean,

1:16:37.080 --> 1:16:40.320
<v Speaker 1>he thinks if he can somehow find anything that becomes

1:16:40.360 --> 1:16:46.439
<v Speaker 1>believable behind his delusional followers on this, it allows him

1:16:46.520 --> 1:16:51.240
<v Speaker 1>not to declare any victory about twenty twenty, but then

1:16:51.280 --> 1:16:56.360
<v Speaker 1>he will use that as a way to legitimize likely

1:16:56.439 --> 1:16:59.240
<v Speaker 1>using the government to interfere in the actual elections themselves

1:16:59.240 --> 1:17:02.760
<v Speaker 1>in twenty twenty six, twenty twenty eight. Now I say

1:17:02.760 --> 1:17:04.920
<v Speaker 1>that in that I still don't believe he can effectively

1:17:04.960 --> 1:17:07.040
<v Speaker 1>do that. I think there's enough checks and balances in

1:17:07.080 --> 1:17:09.240
<v Speaker 1>the states. I think it's not going to happen. And

1:17:09.280 --> 1:17:13.920
<v Speaker 1>I think that, you know, I vacillate between being worried

1:17:13.920 --> 1:17:15.880
<v Speaker 1>and laughing at these attempts that he's doing. I think

1:17:15.880 --> 1:17:19.640
<v Speaker 1>he's making just an absolute fool of himself. And more importantly,

1:17:19.920 --> 1:17:22.880
<v Speaker 1>I mean, I mean literally the laughing stock of the

1:17:22.880 --> 1:17:25.800
<v Speaker 1>intelligence community is Tulsa Gabbert, Right, but she has been

1:17:26.920 --> 1:17:31.479
<v Speaker 1>I will say that she must be beyond humiliation which

1:17:31.520 --> 1:17:34.439
<v Speaker 1>means she has her own sort of delusions about all

1:17:34.479 --> 1:17:42.360
<v Speaker 1>of this. But it's it's whenever you apply logic to

1:17:42.400 --> 1:17:45.719
<v Speaker 1>anyone of Trump's arguments, they fall apart completely, which means

1:17:45.960 --> 1:17:49.760
<v Speaker 1>it's never been about logic all right. Next question comes

1:17:49.760 --> 1:17:51.840
<v Speaker 1>from Luke Hey. Thanks for tackling the issue of sports betting.

1:17:51.840 --> 1:17:53.760
<v Speaker 1>I've seen it devastate families, and I refuse to work

1:17:53.760 --> 1:17:56.759
<v Speaker 1>for gambling platforms because of the ethical concerns. My question

1:17:56.840 --> 1:17:59.439
<v Speaker 1>is about professional ethics. It people with integrity keep quitting

1:17:59.520 --> 1:18:03.160
<v Speaker 1>problematic institutions. Do those spaces just get worse? Is it

1:18:03.200 --> 1:18:05.320
<v Speaker 1>better to stay and try to limit the damage from within?

1:18:05.720 --> 1:18:07.800
<v Speaker 1>I'm torn between sticking to my moral line or trying

1:18:07.800 --> 1:18:11.160
<v Speaker 1>to be sand in the gears from the inside. Loops, Well,

1:18:11.280 --> 1:18:15.719
<v Speaker 1>welcome to what a lot of prosecutors, career prosecutors are

1:18:16.120 --> 1:18:19.400
<v Speaker 1>contemplating at the Justice Department, What a lot of career

1:18:19.479 --> 1:18:23.919
<v Speaker 1>form policy folks are thinking about at the State Department.

1:18:24.240 --> 1:18:28.720
<v Speaker 1>What many career military particularly for one, two and three

1:18:28.760 --> 1:18:35.160
<v Speaker 1>star generals, high ranking admirals. You know that this is

1:18:36.760 --> 1:18:44.400
<v Speaker 1>this is this is a huge dilemma, you know, I don't.

1:18:44.439 --> 1:18:46.160
<v Speaker 1>I think everybody's got their own line, So I'm not

1:18:46.160 --> 1:18:49.880
<v Speaker 1>going to tell you what your line should be. I'll

1:18:49.920 --> 1:18:52.000
<v Speaker 1>just tell you what my line is. If I feel

1:18:52.040 --> 1:18:56.680
<v Speaker 1>like I can be effective, not just being sand in

1:18:56.720 --> 1:19:00.559
<v Speaker 1>the gears right and doing you know, feeling like I

1:19:00.560 --> 1:19:03.160
<v Speaker 1>have to sneakily upend things, but I feel like I

1:19:03.200 --> 1:19:07.600
<v Speaker 1>can turn the tide, I can report what needs to

1:19:07.640 --> 1:19:11.040
<v Speaker 1>be reported or whatever it is, then it is worth

1:19:11.080 --> 1:19:14.479
<v Speaker 1>sticking around. If you feel like your position can prevent

1:19:16.479 --> 1:19:19.840
<v Speaker 1>the worst things to happen, and you say to yourself, well, hey,

1:19:20.720 --> 1:19:22.519
<v Speaker 1>you know, I just have to do it for nine

1:19:22.560 --> 1:19:25.800
<v Speaker 1>months until we get new leadership. Right, That's why it

1:19:26.000 --> 1:19:30.000
<v Speaker 1>to me. I would advise somebody at the Justice Department,

1:19:30.000 --> 1:19:32.320
<v Speaker 1>in somebody the state department to stick it out right,

1:19:32.800 --> 1:19:34.479
<v Speaker 1>believe in the democracy. You don't have to believe in

1:19:34.560 --> 1:19:37.160
<v Speaker 1>the administration. You can believe in the democracy that there

1:19:37.200 --> 1:19:41.280
<v Speaker 1>will be you know that bad There are good stewards

1:19:41.320 --> 1:19:45.840
<v Speaker 1>and bad stewards, but there'll be another steward. Because I

1:19:45.880 --> 1:19:48.080
<v Speaker 1>do think on the political side and in the public

1:19:48.120 --> 1:19:51.559
<v Speaker 1>service sector, the more good actors that leave, they will

1:19:51.560 --> 1:19:53.840
<v Speaker 1>only be filled with bad actors and it will only

1:19:53.880 --> 1:19:57.559
<v Speaker 1>get worse than it might be irreparable. Right, So on

1:19:57.640 --> 1:20:06.080
<v Speaker 1>the private sector side. I think it's a harder call, right.

1:20:07.000 --> 1:20:09.160
<v Speaker 1>It's one thing to be stand in the gears to

1:20:09.200 --> 1:20:12.599
<v Speaker 1>another thing. If you're literally working against the business interests

1:20:12.600 --> 1:20:16.719
<v Speaker 1>of the company, and if they're not committing illegal acts,

1:20:17.200 --> 1:20:19.240
<v Speaker 1>then I think it is better to quit on moral

1:20:19.280 --> 1:20:22.519
<v Speaker 1>and ethical grounds, but do so publicly say why you're

1:20:22.560 --> 1:20:28.640
<v Speaker 1>doing it. To do it silently, then it's ineffective. You know,

1:20:28.800 --> 1:20:31.559
<v Speaker 1>speak out, become a whistleblower, right, become the person that

1:20:31.600 --> 1:20:33.560
<v Speaker 1>worked for the tobacco companies to talk about all that

1:20:33.880 --> 1:20:36.400
<v Speaker 1>you know, or the person that worked at Meta and

1:20:36.760 --> 1:20:40.320
<v Speaker 1>saw everything that Facebook was doing to sort of weaponize

1:20:40.520 --> 1:20:44.880
<v Speaker 1>the likes and the algorithms and stuff. You know. But

1:20:44.920 --> 1:20:47.679
<v Speaker 1>I guess that's where I would go. I think it's

1:20:48.320 --> 1:20:51.240
<v Speaker 1>I think if you're in the if you work for government,

1:20:52.920 --> 1:20:55.920
<v Speaker 1>I think you're obligated to stick it out. I think

1:20:55.960 --> 1:20:58.240
<v Speaker 1>if you work in the private sector and you have

1:20:58.280 --> 1:21:02.479
<v Speaker 1>ethical and moral quandary, is I think then it's you know,

1:21:02.560 --> 1:21:10.719
<v Speaker 1>I probably would be on the side of make it.

1:21:10.720 --> 1:21:12.759
<v Speaker 1>It would be easier for me to support you walking

1:21:13.000 --> 1:21:15.760
<v Speaker 1>than not walking, But I wouldn't do it quietly. If

1:21:15.800 --> 1:21:18.200
<v Speaker 1>you want to, if you want to try to effect change,

1:21:18.280 --> 1:21:25.120
<v Speaker 1>you know now if there can if you think you

1:21:25.160 --> 1:21:27.920
<v Speaker 1>know there is a reason to stay is if you

1:21:27.920 --> 1:21:30.080
<v Speaker 1>think they're doing something illegal and you need to gather

1:21:30.160 --> 1:21:34.679
<v Speaker 1>evidence and and and become a whistleblower. That's that's yet

1:21:34.680 --> 1:21:39.439
<v Speaker 1>another motivation to potentially stay if you truly believe something

1:21:39.479 --> 1:21:47.519
<v Speaker 1>illegal is taking place. All right, appreciate the question, Luke,

1:21:47.560 --> 1:21:51.400
<v Speaker 1>and you know there's no easy answers on those things.

1:21:51.720 --> 1:21:53.519
<v Speaker 1>Next question comes from Tyler. Hey, I saw your video

1:21:54.000 --> 1:21:56.200
<v Speaker 1>on the state's Democrats might put in play by twenty

1:21:56.200 --> 1:21:58.320
<v Speaker 1>thirty two. I'm curious why Mississippi wasn't on your list.

1:21:58.320 --> 1:22:01.320
<v Speaker 1>It's clearly it's nearly for percent African American and often

1:22:01.360 --> 1:22:04.080
<v Speaker 1>shows more Blue counties than other Southern states. Couldn't increasing

1:22:04.120 --> 1:22:06.920
<v Speaker 1>registration and turn out among African American voters make it competitive.

1:22:06.920 --> 1:22:10.040
<v Speaker 1>Would love to hear your thoughts. I think I did

1:22:10.080 --> 1:22:12.800
<v Speaker 1>mention that Mississippi's on my next round of lists. I

1:22:12.800 --> 1:22:15.400
<v Speaker 1>think I believe it's in that and as you know,

1:22:15.520 --> 1:22:21.000
<v Speaker 1>I keep talking about the Mississippi as Democrats search for

1:22:21.080 --> 1:22:23.719
<v Speaker 1>more Senate seats to put in play in the twenty

1:22:23.760 --> 1:22:25.840
<v Speaker 1>six cycle that I think Mississippi should be one of

1:22:25.880 --> 1:22:29.000
<v Speaker 1>those states for all it's exactly the reason you lay

1:22:29.000 --> 1:22:31.400
<v Speaker 1>out right. I think Mississippi, into a lesser extent, South

1:22:31.400 --> 1:22:33.920
<v Speaker 1>Carolina is the other state in the South where there's

1:22:33.920 --> 1:22:40.080
<v Speaker 1>clearly an un activated African American vote, either underregistrated in

1:22:40.120 --> 1:22:43.280
<v Speaker 1>the rural counties in Mississippi and South Carolina or just

1:22:43.520 --> 1:22:46.960
<v Speaker 1>under campaigned. Right, I've I've spent a lot of time

1:22:48.680 --> 1:22:52.160
<v Speaker 1>a couple of cycles ago, we were doing some some

1:22:52.240 --> 1:22:56.120
<v Speaker 1>of our counties to watch and before the twenty sixteen

1:22:56.200 --> 1:22:58.040
<v Speaker 1>cycle or for the twenty twenty cycle, one of the

1:22:58.080 --> 1:23:00.240
<v Speaker 1>counties I wanted to focus on was one of the

1:23:00.280 --> 1:23:03.840
<v Speaker 1>African rural African American majority African American counties on the

1:23:03.880 --> 1:23:07.519
<v Speaker 1>border of North and South Carolina. And how that the

1:23:07.560 --> 1:23:10.640
<v Speaker 1>one time Barack Obama that Democrats carried North Carolina in

1:23:10.680 --> 1:23:13.040
<v Speaker 1>the twenty first century. Barack Obama was on the ballot

1:23:13.120 --> 1:23:16.160
<v Speaker 1>the first time, and he did a great job of

1:23:16.200 --> 1:23:18.880
<v Speaker 1>activating the rural African American vote. North Carolina in twenty

1:23:18.920 --> 1:23:20.840
<v Speaker 1>oh eight did not do as good of a job

1:23:20.840 --> 1:23:22.640
<v Speaker 1>in twenty twelve, and they didn't carry the state, but

1:23:22.640 --> 1:23:25.080
<v Speaker 1>they did in twenty oh eight. The point is, I

1:23:25.200 --> 1:23:28.680
<v Speaker 1>do think that one of the reasons why Democrats have

1:23:28.760 --> 1:23:33.000
<v Speaker 1>been slow at seeing the opportunity in Mississippi is that

1:23:33.040 --> 1:23:36.360
<v Speaker 1>they're blind on rural on rural America, right. You know,

1:23:36.479 --> 1:23:40.280
<v Speaker 1>their inability to get support from rural whites isn't due

1:23:40.280 --> 1:23:43.320
<v Speaker 1>to just rural whites, it's all over. It explains why

1:23:43.680 --> 1:23:49.439
<v Speaker 1>rural Hispanics lean right in Texas, rural blacks are. While

1:23:49.439 --> 1:23:53.040
<v Speaker 1>they don't necessarily lean right in the South, they're less

1:23:53.240 --> 1:24:00.400
<v Speaker 1>supportive of Democrats than urban African Americans. So yes, I

1:24:00.439 --> 1:24:03.240
<v Speaker 1>do believe Mississippi should be in that if you expanded

1:24:03.280 --> 1:24:04.880
<v Speaker 1>it out to the top ten states they should be

1:24:04.880 --> 1:24:07.920
<v Speaker 1>focused on. I think it's six or seven on that list,

1:24:08.640 --> 1:24:13.639
<v Speaker 1>and they need to. But it's a multi year project

1:24:13.680 --> 1:24:17.040
<v Speaker 1>in Mississippi because there's a lot particularly in rural America,

1:24:17.200 --> 1:24:20.240
<v Speaker 1>rural Black America, rural Wide America, and rural Hispanic America.

1:24:20.400 --> 1:24:23.080
<v Speaker 1>Democrats have stopped showing up over the last twenty years

1:24:23.439 --> 1:24:28.439
<v Speaker 1>and they have to reverse that trend. Next question comes

1:24:28.479 --> 1:24:34.000
<v Speaker 1>from Charles Davis. Great name, Charles, Love to know, Charles, Charlie, Chuck, Chaz,

1:24:34.120 --> 1:24:37.439
<v Speaker 1>Chad you what's your favorite of all of our The

1:24:39.680 --> 1:24:42.080
<v Speaker 1>insane amount of nicknames that can come out of the

1:24:42.160 --> 1:24:45.400
<v Speaker 1>name Charles. But I digress. It says, thanks for your

1:24:45.520 --> 1:24:47.600
<v Speaker 1>recent podcast of the Kenny Center. It really resonated. I

1:24:47.600 --> 1:24:49.880
<v Speaker 1>believe Trump and his allies are following authoritariing playbook, but

1:24:49.920 --> 1:24:52.680
<v Speaker 1>they underestimated the resolve of cities like Minneapolis and the

1:24:52.680 --> 1:24:55.840
<v Speaker 1>power of grassroots resistance. The militarization of police and the

1:24:55.840 --> 1:24:58.800
<v Speaker 1>behavior of ICE agents are deeply concerning in tragedies like

1:24:58.840 --> 1:25:00.600
<v Speaker 1>the deaths of Renee Good and Alex Preddie show this

1:25:00.680 --> 1:25:02.800
<v Speaker 1>takes serve my country in many ways, and I've never

1:25:02.840 --> 1:25:07.559
<v Speaker 1>been more worried or more hopeful that Americans are waking up.

1:25:07.600 --> 1:25:09.439
<v Speaker 1>I voted our most of my life. Trump ended that

1:25:09.520 --> 1:25:12.080
<v Speaker 1>no more, and I enjoy your podcast. Keep the good work. Look,

1:25:12.160 --> 1:25:16.080
<v Speaker 1>I appreciate you writing this note, And obviously it's not

1:25:16.080 --> 1:25:19.000
<v Speaker 1>really a question, but it's a statement that I'll want

1:25:19.000 --> 1:25:21.960
<v Speaker 1>to refer have a lot of people refer to when

1:25:21.960 --> 1:25:27.240
<v Speaker 1>they start to feel bleak. You know, what he's doing

1:25:27.320 --> 1:25:30.320
<v Speaker 1>is not popular. That's sort of the point of the

1:25:30.600 --> 1:25:33.679
<v Speaker 1>opening of this podcast. Republicans don't like what he's doing.

1:25:34.040 --> 1:25:36.200
<v Speaker 1>In the words of John dan Forth, aren't we better

1:25:36.240 --> 1:25:41.200
<v Speaker 1>than this? Right? Jack dan Forth thought the Republican Party

1:25:42.560 --> 1:25:46.240
<v Speaker 1>had had more morals than than it does under Donald Trump,

1:25:46.800 --> 1:25:49.160
<v Speaker 1>and had any sort of ethical lines that they would draw,

1:25:49.240 --> 1:25:55.160
<v Speaker 1>and they don't. But nobody likes this, you know, and

1:25:55.400 --> 1:25:57.599
<v Speaker 1>it goes back to, you know, the whole, the whole.

1:25:57.680 --> 1:25:59.320
<v Speaker 1>I do think there are a lot of people who

1:25:59.360 --> 1:26:03.320
<v Speaker 1>supported Trump who don't like being seen as racist like Trump.

1:26:04.479 --> 1:26:10.080
<v Speaker 1>And it's you know, I always say this about Trump.

1:26:10.320 --> 1:26:14.320
<v Speaker 1>Everybody has their own line, and Trump crosses it at

1:26:14.360 --> 1:26:19.040
<v Speaker 1>different times. It sounds like Charles for you, he crossed

1:26:19.080 --> 1:26:22.680
<v Speaker 1>the line a while ago, as I always say for

1:26:22.760 --> 1:26:26.920
<v Speaker 1>Liz jad he didn't cross the line until January sixth, right,

1:26:27.360 --> 1:26:30.000
<v Speaker 1>But when he crossed that line, man, she was out,

1:26:30.160 --> 1:26:35.320
<v Speaker 1>and she was out loudly. John Bolton was out, probably

1:26:35.320 --> 1:26:39.280
<v Speaker 1>sooner than most people thought he'd be out. Mike Pence, Right,

1:26:39.320 --> 1:26:41.360
<v Speaker 1>you see where I'm going here. Everybody has their line

1:26:41.400 --> 1:26:45.839
<v Speaker 1>at different moments. Looks like Rand Paul has a line,

1:26:46.160 --> 1:26:48.879
<v Speaker 1>looks like Thomas Massey has a line, looks like Marjorie

1:26:48.880 --> 1:26:51.720
<v Speaker 1>Taylor Green has a line. And three years ago, if

1:26:51.760 --> 1:26:53.400
<v Speaker 1>I said every republic has a line, some of you

1:26:53.479 --> 1:26:55.400
<v Speaker 1>might have said, well, Marjorie, there's no line for Marjorie

1:26:55.400 --> 1:27:00.160
<v Speaker 1>Taylor Green. Yes, there is. Everybody has a line, and

1:27:00.200 --> 1:27:02.719
<v Speaker 1>I think and this is what I think you're right about,

1:27:02.720 --> 1:27:07.240
<v Speaker 1>which is, you know, not all of these stories impact

1:27:07.560 --> 1:27:11.320
<v Speaker 1>everybody the same way, but a lot of people are

1:27:11.360 --> 1:27:13.920
<v Speaker 1>impacted by at least one of these stories in the

1:27:13.960 --> 1:27:17.280
<v Speaker 1>same way. And that's why he's got approval ratings that

1:27:17.360 --> 1:27:21.160
<v Speaker 1>at best are in the low forties. That's why we're

1:27:21.400 --> 1:27:25.000
<v Speaker 1>on the verge of having a record number of lawmakers

1:27:25.040 --> 1:27:27.920
<v Speaker 1>say I'm out of Trump's Washington, get me out of here.

1:27:28.560 --> 1:27:30.600
<v Speaker 1>By the way, you know, it's interesting about these retirees,

1:27:31.760 --> 1:27:38.280
<v Speaker 1>right those that there's about thirty retirements Republican retirees so

1:27:38.400 --> 1:27:42.680
<v Speaker 1>far this cycle, Essentially half of them are retiring to

1:27:42.760 --> 1:27:44.439
<v Speaker 1>run for higher office, and the other half of them

1:27:44.479 --> 1:27:47.360
<v Speaker 1>are just walking away from politics. Well, the lion's share

1:27:47.360 --> 1:27:49.160
<v Speaker 1>of those that are just walking away from politics all

1:27:49.200 --> 1:27:53.120
<v Speaker 1>Republicans elected before twenty sixteen. Those that are doing the

1:27:53.200 --> 1:27:56.519
<v Speaker 1>upper out are just about all Republicans elected twenty sixteen

1:27:56.600 --> 1:28:02.559
<v Speaker 1>or later. The old Republican Party that accommodated Trump. More

1:28:02.600 --> 1:28:06.200
<v Speaker 1>and more of them are having trouble accommodating him. And

1:28:06.320 --> 1:28:10.080
<v Speaker 1>like I said, every week somebody he crosses the line

1:28:10.200 --> 1:28:15.120
<v Speaker 1>for somebody else. He is not gaining any new support.

1:28:15.360 --> 1:28:21.800
<v Speaker 1>Every week Donald Trump loses more support. Next question comes

1:28:21.840 --> 1:28:25.439
<v Speaker 1>from Rico from Sequoia National Forest. All right, well, here

1:28:25.439 --> 1:28:27.479
<v Speaker 1>we are two big baseball fans gearing up for another

1:28:27.479 --> 1:28:29.200
<v Speaker 1>on hundred and sixty two game season. But I still

1:28:29.200 --> 1:28:31.479
<v Speaker 1>can't get over what I think is the dumbest rule

1:28:31.520 --> 1:28:33.559
<v Speaker 1>in sports, the intentional walk of teams want to pitch

1:28:33.600 --> 1:28:36.080
<v Speaker 1>around guys like Otanni. Fine, but make it cost two

1:28:36.080 --> 1:28:39.080
<v Speaker 1>bases instead of one. I like where you're going there.

1:28:39.240 --> 1:28:41.280
<v Speaker 1>MLBE keeps talking about speeding up the game. So why

1:28:41.280 --> 1:28:44.080
<v Speaker 1>not fix this? What say you keep the cowardice or

1:28:44.240 --> 1:28:49.720
<v Speaker 1>change the rule? Wow? Two bases for intentional walks? You

1:28:49.760 --> 1:28:55.800
<v Speaker 1>know I could see I could buy into that. You know,

1:28:56.280 --> 1:29:02.400
<v Speaker 1>maybe it's something like you get it. You can't you

1:29:02.439 --> 1:29:08.439
<v Speaker 1>can only intentionally walk a player once again, and and

1:29:09.479 --> 1:29:12.479
<v Speaker 1>you know you can so because I think what's first

1:29:12.479 --> 1:29:14.040
<v Speaker 1>of all, it's bad for the fans, right, we want

1:29:14.080 --> 1:29:16.040
<v Speaker 1>to see Otani hit. So let's just you know, I

1:29:16.040 --> 1:29:17.880
<v Speaker 1>remember this with Bonds too, but let's just say it

1:29:17.880 --> 1:29:21.040
<v Speaker 1>with Otani. You know, you know, Tani is like, you know,

1:29:21.240 --> 1:29:23.880
<v Speaker 1>a version of the NBA on the road, right, you know,

1:29:24.000 --> 1:29:27.439
<v Speaker 1>NBA in the regular season and Lakers come to town.

1:29:27.439 --> 1:29:30.080
<v Speaker 1>All right, I want to see Lebron. Oh, Lebron's resting tonight,

1:29:30.240 --> 1:29:32.679
<v Speaker 1>you know, you know, with the with the with the

1:29:32.760 --> 1:29:34.560
<v Speaker 1>with the minute. So it's not very fan friendly. And

1:29:34.600 --> 1:29:36.599
<v Speaker 1>you spend all this money, you think take your kid

1:29:36.640 --> 1:29:38.439
<v Speaker 1>to see Lebron the one time a year that Lebron

1:29:38.479 --> 1:29:40.479
<v Speaker 1>shows up, particularly if you're in the Eastern Conference. Right,

1:29:41.040 --> 1:29:44.559
<v Speaker 1>So nobody wants to go to a game all excited

1:29:44.560 --> 1:29:46.280
<v Speaker 1>to see Otani play for the first time, only to

1:29:46.280 --> 1:29:51.559
<v Speaker 1>see him intentionally walk three times. So I think an

1:29:51.600 --> 1:29:53.519
<v Speaker 1>addendum I would make to your rule is I think

1:29:53.520 --> 1:29:57.240
<v Speaker 1>it's one that you can't intentionally walk any player more

1:29:57.280 --> 1:30:00.200
<v Speaker 1>than once a game. And if you do I want

1:30:00.240 --> 1:30:04.920
<v Speaker 1>to intentionally walk, it's it's it's two. It's two bases,

1:30:07.880 --> 1:30:11.200
<v Speaker 1>I think. I guess I look at it this way.

1:30:11.280 --> 1:30:14.679
<v Speaker 1>Rico and my dog here has a very strong opinion

1:30:14.680 --> 1:30:17.400
<v Speaker 1>about this too. Speaking of intentional walks, she would like

1:30:17.439 --> 1:30:21.800
<v Speaker 1>to be intentionally walked. Right after I finished taping this episode.

1:30:21.880 --> 1:30:24.759
<v Speaker 1>But I think I don't think you will get support

1:30:24.800 --> 1:30:27.599
<v Speaker 1>for just doing all intentional walks two bases. But I

1:30:27.640 --> 1:30:31.599
<v Speaker 1>do think if you make it one per game per player,

1:30:32.520 --> 1:30:34.599
<v Speaker 1>that might be a better way to do things, all right,

1:30:34.640 --> 1:30:38.960
<v Speaker 1>last question, Like I said, I gotta intentionally walk Cali

1:30:40.080 --> 1:30:42.439
<v Speaker 1>just wanted to toss out a new name that scandal

1:30:42.520 --> 1:30:46.280
<v Speaker 1>headlines Okay, here it is, the Abu Dhabi crypto affair,

1:30:47.160 --> 1:30:52.639
<v Speaker 1>all right, the Maga coin con okay, the shake Steak

1:30:52.800 --> 1:30:57.760
<v Speaker 1>scandal kind of sizzling, right if the words sizzle in there, right,

1:30:58.479 --> 1:31:01.120
<v Speaker 1>hope one of these sticks best. Chase from Little Rock, Arkansas.

1:31:02.000 --> 1:31:05.120
<v Speaker 1>He claims it's he keeps saying the five Timers Club, Chase.

1:31:05.160 --> 1:31:07.160
<v Speaker 1>I think we're up to six or seven Timers Club

1:31:07.280 --> 1:31:10.800
<v Speaker 1>on this. So well, there it is. That's a good

1:31:10.800 --> 1:31:13.479
<v Speaker 1>way to end this, end this episode. Let's see what

1:31:13.479 --> 1:31:16.400
<v Speaker 1>you guys come up with. He's trying Abu Dhabi crypto affair,

1:31:17.479 --> 1:31:24.920
<v Speaker 1>the Maga coin con, and the Shakesteak scandal and Chase.

1:31:25.000 --> 1:31:29.559
<v Speaker 1>I would probably say, let's go back to the drawing boarder.

1:31:29.600 --> 1:31:31.880
<v Speaker 1>Let's get some more nominees out there. That's all I'm saying.

1:31:31.920 --> 1:31:34.320
<v Speaker 1>Let's get some Let's get some more nominees out there.

1:31:35.760 --> 1:31:39.640
<v Speaker 1>So with that, hey, listen, I I'm going to be

1:31:40.640 --> 1:31:43.280
<v Speaker 1>a cheerleader for one thing, and that's Team USA. I

1:31:43.400 --> 1:31:49.800
<v Speaker 1>love you know, I give my old, my old, my

1:31:49.880 --> 1:31:51.880
<v Speaker 1>old workplace, a lot of grief on what they've done

1:31:51.920 --> 1:31:54.120
<v Speaker 1>to the new side of things. I'm not gonna walk,

1:31:54.280 --> 1:31:59.240
<v Speaker 1>I'm not gonna relitigate what's happened on that front. I

1:31:59.360 --> 1:32:01.960
<v Speaker 1>just want to give a lot of kudos and credit

1:32:02.000 --> 1:32:04.439
<v Speaker 1>to the coverage of the Olympics by my old employer.

1:32:04.439 --> 1:32:07.599
<v Speaker 1>I think IBC Sports do a terrific job. They have finally,

1:32:07.720 --> 1:32:10.120
<v Speaker 1>I think, and you saw it with the last you

1:32:10.200 --> 1:32:14.639
<v Speaker 1>really saw it in twenty twenty four, with the gold

1:32:14.760 --> 1:32:17.559
<v Speaker 1>Zone and everything they've done. But they have really figured

1:32:17.600 --> 1:32:22.200
<v Speaker 1>out I mean the Olympics and this streaming moment, right like,

1:32:22.240 --> 1:32:24.559
<v Speaker 1>if you talk about a sporting event that was built

1:32:24.680 --> 1:32:26.639
<v Speaker 1>for this moment that we live in where you can

1:32:26.720 --> 1:32:30.040
<v Speaker 1>just go find your sport, find your stream, the gold Zone.

1:32:30.439 --> 1:32:33.760
<v Speaker 1>If you actually want to watch the Olympics for competition,

1:32:34.200 --> 1:32:37.680
<v Speaker 1>you can just watch a stream that does that. You know.

1:32:37.720 --> 1:32:40.200
<v Speaker 1>If you do want the stories and sort of the

1:32:40.200 --> 1:32:42.599
<v Speaker 1>soap opera part of the Olympics that the network always

1:32:42.640 --> 1:32:45.559
<v Speaker 1>gives you, you can do that too. But I just

1:32:46.000 --> 1:32:51.080
<v Speaker 1>will say that I am there's no qualification here, guys.

1:32:51.200 --> 1:32:55.960
<v Speaker 1>It's fantastic. I love what's being done. I love the coverage.

1:32:57.240 --> 1:33:02.280
<v Speaker 1>It breaks my heart that Team USA and Team Israel

1:33:02.280 --> 1:33:04.160
<v Speaker 1>gets booed as hard as they are right now in Europe.

1:33:05.439 --> 1:33:08.760
<v Speaker 1>That that hurts, right, I wish I but I also

1:33:08.840 --> 1:33:11.720
<v Speaker 1>understand it. And the only word of warning I'd give

1:33:11.760 --> 1:33:14.800
<v Speaker 1>to my friends at NBC Sports is, you know, I

1:33:14.840 --> 1:33:17.400
<v Speaker 1>get you want to try to make the games about

1:33:17.400 --> 1:33:24.120
<v Speaker 1>the games. There's there's there's avoiding politics, but then they're

1:33:24.160 --> 1:33:27.920
<v Speaker 1>censoring it. Be careful of walking that line. I'm all

1:33:27.960 --> 1:33:31.160
<v Speaker 1>for avoiding it. You want to showcase the games, but

1:33:31.200 --> 1:33:35.320
<v Speaker 1>be careful censoring. I think it's important for the audience

1:33:35.360 --> 1:33:40.200
<v Speaker 1>to know how unpopular an American official is. If there

1:33:40.320 --> 1:33:43.439
<v Speaker 1>is a moment that that happens, all right with that,

1:33:43.720 --> 1:33:44.720
<v Speaker 1>I'll see in forty eight nine,