WEBVTT - Waiver Wire Tuesday, Monday Night recap, and more...

0:00:00.560 --> 0:00:03.640
<v Speaker 1>Hey, thanks for downloading the podcast, and remember, if you

0:00:03.680 --> 0:00:07.160
<v Speaker 1>want to listen live, download the I Heart Radio app,

0:00:07.240 --> 0:00:10.080
<v Speaker 1>download the tune and app and just search for Fantasy

0:00:10.240 --> 0:00:14.760
<v Speaker 1>Sports Radio Network and you could listen to this program live. Also,

0:00:14.920 --> 0:00:17.360
<v Speaker 1>if you want to watch the video of this podcast,

0:00:17.600 --> 0:00:21.000
<v Speaker 1>check us out on YouTube, on twitch, or on Periscope

0:00:21.120 --> 0:00:24.840
<v Speaker 1>and type in you guess did Fantasy Sports Network. You'll

0:00:24.880 --> 0:00:28.160
<v Speaker 1>find us there. Enjoy the show and thanks for listening.

0:00:30.200 --> 0:00:38.840
<v Speaker 1>You're listening to the Fantasy Sports Radio Network. Fantasy best

0:00:38.840 --> 0:00:52.880
<v Speaker 1>Friends Forever, m Do to to Do? Didn do too

0:00:53.000 --> 0:00:58.880
<v Speaker 1>to do? Didn do to to do? Did it do? Yo?

0:01:00.120 --> 0:01:04.640
<v Speaker 1>Is his the Fantasy best Friends Forever Here on the

0:01:04.640 --> 0:01:07.920
<v Speaker 1>Fantasy Sports Ring your Network alongside Frankie Stamfold. My name

0:01:07.959 --> 0:01:11.840
<v Speaker 1>is Greg Sauceman. What's going on, Frankie? Nothing? Just need

0:01:11.920 --> 0:01:14.880
<v Speaker 1>a chance to catch my breath. Greg, you keep talking

0:01:16.040 --> 0:01:19.560
<v Speaker 1>on the program. At eight It is a waiver wire Tuesday.

0:01:19.600 --> 0:01:21.920
<v Speaker 1>But you already knew that the BFS will tell you

0:01:22.000 --> 0:01:25.240
<v Speaker 1>who you need to grab at every position, but more importantly,

0:01:25.360 --> 0:01:29.039
<v Speaker 1>potentially who you need to drop. That's usually the harder question,

0:01:29.080 --> 0:01:31.080
<v Speaker 1>and that's why Frank and I are here to help

0:01:31.160 --> 0:01:33.800
<v Speaker 1>you out and to make sure that you're not making

0:01:33.800 --> 0:01:36.080
<v Speaker 1>the wrong decision as I did in both my matchups

0:01:36.080 --> 0:01:38.640
<v Speaker 1>on yes yesterday, which I would have easily won if

0:01:38.640 --> 0:01:40.679
<v Speaker 1>I would have started Robert Woods over a guy like

0:01:40.760 --> 0:01:43.520
<v Speaker 1>Kenny and Drake over a guy like Chris Hogan over

0:01:43.560 --> 0:01:46.480
<v Speaker 1>a guy like Cooper Cup, make that start wind up

0:01:46.480 --> 0:01:50.720
<v Speaker 1>winning instead? I lost difference between two and one or

0:01:50.800 --> 0:01:54.560
<v Speaker 1>three and out potentially and one and two. How are

0:01:54.600 --> 0:01:57.040
<v Speaker 1>you feeling now a little bit better? A little better?

0:01:57.280 --> 0:02:01.200
<v Speaker 1>Frank got a haircut something like that? Like, got a

0:02:01.240 --> 0:02:06.680
<v Speaker 1>beard trim as well, Frankie well groomed something like that. Sure,

0:02:07.240 --> 0:02:09.160
<v Speaker 1>so let's I'm gonna get it trimed down a little

0:02:09.160 --> 0:02:12.440
<v Speaker 1>bit more. See what happens. Let's get into mondtball here

0:02:12.480 --> 0:02:18.440
<v Speaker 1>would you think? Um? I thought everyone was obviously writing

0:02:18.440 --> 0:02:22.160
<v Speaker 1>off Ryan Fitzpatrick very early in the game. Um, no

0:02:22.280 --> 0:02:25.440
<v Speaker 1>surprise he I mean rightfully. So he had three interceptions

0:02:25.480 --> 0:02:28.799
<v Speaker 1>I believe in the first half. Um, but he turned

0:02:28.840 --> 0:02:32.079
<v Speaker 1>it around. I mean, first quarterback to have four hundred

0:02:32.520 --> 0:02:35.880
<v Speaker 1>or more passing yards in three straight games. First quarterback

0:02:35.880 --> 0:02:38.440
<v Speaker 1>in NFL history. The NFL has been around a long time.

0:02:39.520 --> 0:02:41.760
<v Speaker 1>No surprise that Ryan Fitzpatrick is the one out here?

0:02:41.800 --> 0:02:45.200
<v Speaker 1>Breaking records. It's magic. Maybe, yeah. So look he bounced

0:02:45.240 --> 0:02:49.760
<v Speaker 1>back four hundred yards, three touchdowns, three interceptions, UM, And

0:02:49.880 --> 0:02:53.280
<v Speaker 1>I think I want to question, do we want Jameis

0:02:53.320 --> 0:02:56.320
<v Speaker 1>Winston to be the starting quarterback for this team? Because

0:02:56.400 --> 0:02:59.880
<v Speaker 1>given how well Ryan Fitzpatrick has worked with the Ten

0:03:00.080 --> 0:03:02.720
<v Speaker 1>Bay Bucks weapons, whether it's Mike Evans who's got off

0:03:02.720 --> 0:03:06.919
<v Speaker 1>to a phenomenal start, Chris Godwin who was targeted double

0:03:06.919 --> 0:03:10.760
<v Speaker 1>digit times last night, UM was getting force fed targets

0:03:10.760 --> 0:03:12.919
<v Speaker 1>in the end zone as well, ended up scoring that touchdown.

0:03:13.480 --> 0:03:16.400
<v Speaker 1>Looks like he's going to be a great player as well.

0:03:16.440 --> 0:03:18.760
<v Speaker 1>Do we want Jamis Winston to come back and take

0:03:18.800 --> 0:03:20.840
<v Speaker 1>over the court of the quarterback job right here? You

0:03:20.880 --> 0:03:22.239
<v Speaker 1>know the answer to that? Quarter I mean, I don't

0:03:22.320 --> 0:03:24.880
<v Speaker 1>know why would you Why would you want that? No,

0:03:25.440 --> 0:03:28.160
<v Speaker 1>there's still something deep down inside that thinks that James

0:03:28.120 --> 0:03:31.160
<v Speaker 1>Winston has this huge upside. But I guess Ryan Fitzpatrick

0:03:31.280 --> 0:03:34.280
<v Speaker 1>is doing Yeah, well, we always wanted to. Couldn't do

0:03:34.320 --> 0:03:36.200
<v Speaker 1>any better than right It's Patrick. No, there's no way.

0:03:36.240 --> 0:03:39.400
<v Speaker 1>I mean, there's no quarterback ever that's doing better than

0:03:39.680 --> 0:03:41.600
<v Speaker 1>what Ryan Fitzpatrick is doing right now. I don't think

0:03:41.640 --> 0:03:44.360
<v Speaker 1>it's a question for fantasy owners. Dude, I really don't.

0:03:44.400 --> 0:03:47.280
<v Speaker 1>There is no question here, Like you want Rivot's Patrick

0:03:47.360 --> 0:03:52.480
<v Speaker 1>to remain the starting quarterback very obviously. Hello, it was

0:03:52.560 --> 0:03:54.760
<v Speaker 1>came back from seventeen points down in the fourth quarter,

0:03:54.840 --> 0:03:57.160
<v Speaker 1>and if it wasn't, very stupid decision in my estimation,

0:03:57.360 --> 0:04:00.240
<v Speaker 1>but jerk cutter, maybe they did. Like to me, how

0:04:00.280 --> 0:04:03.760
<v Speaker 1>do you how do you punt two minutes and seconds

0:04:03.760 --> 0:04:05.120
<v Speaker 1>ago in the game and get it? You're he just

0:04:05.360 --> 0:04:07.640
<v Speaker 1>had three brutal plays in a row. You're on your

0:04:07.640 --> 0:04:09.400
<v Speaker 1>side of the field. How do you punt if they

0:04:09.400 --> 0:04:11.880
<v Speaker 1>get two first downs? The game is over if you

0:04:11.920 --> 0:04:14.320
<v Speaker 1>hold them out of the end zone, no matter what,

0:04:14.360 --> 0:04:18.560
<v Speaker 1>you got a shot. Terrible terrible coaching. Yeah, just go

0:04:18.680 --> 0:04:21.680
<v Speaker 1>for it there. But look, if you're watching Ryan Fitzpatrick,

0:04:22.080 --> 0:04:24.040
<v Speaker 1>he almost did it again right like when they needed

0:04:24.120 --> 0:04:26.960
<v Speaker 1>him most. It's like every pass that he threw on

0:04:27.040 --> 0:04:30.400
<v Speaker 1>that final drive should have been intercepted. Like that's classic

0:04:30.480 --> 0:04:32.839
<v Speaker 1>Ryan Fitzpatrick. When the most pressure is on him, he

0:04:32.960 --> 0:04:35.159
<v Speaker 1>just like throws balls in the air like without even looking.

0:04:35.640 --> 0:04:37.800
<v Speaker 1>It's crazy. He doesn't care. On the other side of

0:04:37.839 --> 0:04:42.279
<v Speaker 1>you also stay there and get demolished in the pocket. Yeah,

0:04:42.440 --> 0:04:48.000
<v Speaker 1>he's the least on least athletic rushing quarterback that we've

0:04:48.000 --> 0:04:52.039
<v Speaker 1>ever had. Like Ryan Fitzpatrick, you don't like expected from him.

0:04:52.279 --> 0:04:54.360
<v Speaker 1>But five rushes for twenty seven yards, he's mobile to

0:04:54.400 --> 0:04:56.600
<v Speaker 1>get outside the pocket and again he's just gonna wing

0:04:56.600 --> 0:04:59.120
<v Speaker 1>it down the field on the other side of the ball. Um,

0:04:59.160 --> 0:05:02.719
<v Speaker 1>I think garbage time really saved James Conner's day. I

0:05:02.720 --> 0:05:06.360
<v Speaker 1>think before that final drive he had like fifteen yards.

0:05:06.400 --> 0:05:09.200
<v Speaker 1>He ended up with sixty one rushing yards on fifteen carries.

0:05:09.800 --> 0:05:12.520
<v Speaker 1>Was also targeted six times, five receptions for thirty or

0:05:12.520 --> 0:05:15.120
<v Speaker 1>four yards, didn't get in the end zone. But um,

0:05:15.160 --> 0:05:17.680
<v Speaker 1>you know, I thought Corey was crazy yesterday. There are

0:05:17.720 --> 0:05:19.320
<v Speaker 1>a lot of days where I think Corey is crazy,

0:05:19.360 --> 0:05:21.960
<v Speaker 1>but for good reason. Um, I thought he was crazy

0:05:22.000 --> 0:05:24.200
<v Speaker 1>when he was bringing up all these secondary wide receivers

0:05:24.240 --> 0:05:27.920
<v Speaker 1>that are like now better than their counterparts. Do you do,

0:05:28.279 --> 0:05:32.800
<v Speaker 1>Schuster now? For you know, more often than not, this

0:05:32.839 --> 0:05:36.280
<v Speaker 1>season has been better than Antonio Brown. Another game with

0:05:36.640 --> 0:05:39.880
<v Speaker 1>eleven targets, more targets and Antonio Brown, more receptions than

0:05:39.880 --> 0:05:43.359
<v Speaker 1>Antonio Brown, more than double the receiving yards and Antonio Brown,

0:05:44.080 --> 0:05:49.400
<v Speaker 1>do do? Mr? Schuster is absolutely legit I don't. We

0:05:49.480 --> 0:05:51.440
<v Speaker 1>all thought Antonio Brown was going to have a better

0:05:51.440 --> 0:05:54.640
<v Speaker 1>game than he did last night. God bless you. You

0:05:54.800 --> 0:05:57.719
<v Speaker 1>you know it's funny. We're not really funny, pretty pathetic. Actually. Um,

0:05:57.800 --> 0:06:01.000
<v Speaker 1>so I played a player pool where it's a survivor

0:06:01.080 --> 0:06:03.560
<v Speaker 1>player pool where you can't take the same player twice

0:06:03.600 --> 0:06:06.279
<v Speaker 1>throughout the season. Um there's a playoffs that start like

0:06:06.320 --> 0:06:08.560
<v Speaker 1>we twelve and all the points reset, but you still

0:06:08.600 --> 0:06:14.159
<v Speaker 1>can't take the same player twice. So last night we

0:06:14.240 --> 0:06:16.159
<v Speaker 1>had a very We had the first two good weeks,

0:06:16.200 --> 0:06:18.760
<v Speaker 1>really really strong of top twenty eight teams out of

0:06:18.800 --> 0:06:22.680
<v Speaker 1>a whole lot make the playoffs. And for the first

0:06:22.680 --> 0:06:24.960
<v Speaker 1>two weeks we were awesome at had picked really good teams.

0:06:25.720 --> 0:06:27.240
<v Speaker 1>This week, like we knew going in it was gonna

0:06:27.240 --> 0:06:30.800
<v Speaker 1>be a disaster, and it it was. So the first

0:06:30.800 --> 0:06:33.719
<v Speaker 1>two weeks we had scored and it's a true fantasy,

0:06:33.760 --> 0:06:36.200
<v Speaker 1>like a quarterback three woud receivers to running backs, tight end,

0:06:36.480 --> 0:06:39.200
<v Speaker 1>a kicker, defense, um through week Like, I mean, we

0:06:39.320 --> 0:06:41.120
<v Speaker 1>went Week one, we could play a hundred and eighty

0:06:41.120 --> 0:06:43.320
<v Speaker 1>five points or something like that. We two we had

0:06:43.360 --> 0:06:45.640
<v Speaker 1>like a hundred and sixty points something like that. So

0:06:45.720 --> 0:06:48.440
<v Speaker 1>going into Monday, night with a quarterback and a kicker

0:06:48.560 --> 0:06:56.479
<v Speaker 1>left Frank, we had seventy five points. That's very bad,

0:06:56.920 --> 0:06:59.640
<v Speaker 1>very bad. So our quarterback was Ryan Fitzpatrick and our

0:06:59.720 --> 0:07:03.599
<v Speaker 1>kicker was Chandler Canazara. And then we were talking yesterday

0:07:03.680 --> 0:07:06.479
<v Speaker 1>and I'm like, wait a minute, they both can't like

0:07:06.560 --> 0:07:08.159
<v Speaker 1>do really well. Like one of them will do well.

0:07:08.160 --> 0:07:10.080
<v Speaker 1>We should probably kick on the other team. We had

0:07:10.080 --> 0:07:12.960
<v Speaker 1>already used Ben Roethlisberger, so we had Ryan, It's Pattrick.

0:07:13.200 --> 0:07:19.200
<v Speaker 1>Let's switch Chandler Cannazaro with Chris Boswell. That worked poorly

0:07:19.520 --> 0:07:21.600
<v Speaker 1>for us. This is just a weekend of bad decisions

0:07:21.640 --> 0:07:24.760
<v Speaker 1>for Greg. So we couldn't do much right. We couldn't

0:07:24.760 --> 0:07:26.840
<v Speaker 1>do much right. I'm sorry for you, Greg. You don't

0:07:26.840 --> 0:07:28.920
<v Speaker 1>really sound sorry. You gotta sound preocupied to be honestly.

0:07:29.000 --> 0:07:32.600
<v Speaker 1>Do you think it's troubling that Judice Smith Schuster is

0:07:32.640 --> 0:07:38.679
<v Speaker 1>out performing Antonio Brown right now? Troublieve the Antonio Brown owner? Yeah? Yeah,

0:07:38.880 --> 0:07:42.000
<v Speaker 1>we all thought that Juju Smith Schuster was going to

0:07:42.040 --> 0:07:45.200
<v Speaker 1>be the one affected by Antonio Brown. I remember when

0:07:45.200 --> 0:07:47.720
<v Speaker 1>we were having all these arguments, when Michael Florida was

0:07:47.760 --> 0:07:50.160
<v Speaker 1>still around. You guys were telling me all these stats

0:07:50.160 --> 0:07:52.800
<v Speaker 1>about how Judice Smith Schuster only went off when Antonio

0:07:52.840 --> 0:07:54.360
<v Speaker 1>Brown was out of the lineup, and it was true,

0:07:54.760 --> 0:07:57.800
<v Speaker 1>and we were worried about in games that Antonio Brown

0:07:57.840 --> 0:08:02.640
<v Speaker 1>plays Jujuice Smith Schuster, I was gonna take hit. And

0:08:02.720 --> 0:08:05.080
<v Speaker 1>now coming into the year, it seems like Antonio Brown

0:08:05.200 --> 0:08:07.040
<v Speaker 1>is the one that's taking a hit because Judic mis

0:08:07.120 --> 0:08:11.120
<v Speaker 1>Schuster is frankly outperforming him. I saw I saw a

0:08:11.120 --> 0:08:15.400
<v Speaker 1>stat from Graham Barfield um impairing the games that Jujics

0:08:15.400 --> 0:08:18.360
<v Speaker 1>miss Schuster has played without Levan Bell, and those are

0:08:18.440 --> 0:08:21.800
<v Speaker 1>games where he's gone completely off. I don't want to

0:08:21.800 --> 0:08:26.160
<v Speaker 1>say that the trust is gone between Antonio Brown and

0:08:26.200 --> 0:08:29.000
<v Speaker 1>Ben Roethlisberger, but they're not. Only we're not on the

0:08:29.040 --> 0:08:32.240
<v Speaker 1>same page. Multiple times last night, what it called a

0:08:32.280 --> 0:08:34.920
<v Speaker 1>deep a deep route down the left side, like a

0:08:35.000 --> 0:08:39.280
<v Speaker 1>comeback route like Antonio Brown normally knows. When it turned

0:08:39.280 --> 0:08:41.199
<v Speaker 1>around was last third down of the game, and he

0:08:41.280 --> 0:08:43.240
<v Speaker 1>just kept going, just kept going. And then you don't

0:08:43.520 --> 0:08:46.199
<v Speaker 1>see that between those two, No question about it hasn't

0:08:46.240 --> 0:08:51.040
<v Speaker 1>happened with Juju. There is is growing friendship, love, trust,

0:08:51.120 --> 0:08:53.160
<v Speaker 1>whatever you want to call it when it comes to

0:08:53.200 --> 0:08:55.480
<v Speaker 1>Judice to the Schuster that is there. I think it's

0:08:55.520 --> 0:09:00.680
<v Speaker 1>absolutely possible that Juju is taking this role. Yes, So

0:09:00.720 --> 0:09:03.360
<v Speaker 1>that sweet that I mentioned from Grand Barfield. It's Judician

0:09:03.400 --> 0:09:06.480
<v Speaker 1>Schuster's updated receiving lines in games without Levi on Bell

0:09:06.840 --> 0:09:10.079
<v Speaker 1>nine one and one on ten targets five for one,

0:09:10.160 --> 0:09:14.440
<v Speaker 1>nineteen eleven targets, thirteen for one and one nineteen targets,

0:09:15.120 --> 0:09:17.800
<v Speaker 1>nine for one, sixteen on eleven targets. That was last

0:09:17.840 --> 0:09:20.719
<v Speaker 1>night and that span. Juju averages nine receptions per game

0:09:21.160 --> 0:09:23.480
<v Speaker 1>d twenty four point three yards game twelve point eight

0:09:23.520 --> 0:09:25.880
<v Speaker 1>targets per game when Levion Bell is not in the lineup.

0:09:25.960 --> 0:09:29.120
<v Speaker 1>Levion Bell is clearly not the h James Conner is

0:09:29.160 --> 0:09:33.720
<v Speaker 1>clearly not the receiving threat that Levian Bell was obviously

0:09:33.760 --> 0:09:35.480
<v Speaker 1>when he was in the lineup. Like, he still gets

0:09:35.480 --> 0:09:37.760
<v Speaker 1>targets and receptions more so than other running backs, but

0:09:37.800 --> 0:09:40.120
<v Speaker 1>not to the level that Levion Bell did. Yeah, you know,

0:09:40.200 --> 0:09:43.120
<v Speaker 1>it's it's interesting. James Conner probably had his weakest game

0:09:43.200 --> 0:09:45.840
<v Speaker 1>of the season, probably did had his weakest game of

0:09:45.880 --> 0:09:47.720
<v Speaker 1>the season last night. Do you think this brings any

0:09:47.800 --> 0:09:50.320
<v Speaker 1>urgency for then to get Levam Bell to show up?

0:09:50.960 --> 0:09:54.400
<v Speaker 1>Now they won the game, So yeah, I mean it

0:09:54.480 --> 0:09:56.200
<v Speaker 1>was a lot closer than it should have been. We

0:09:56.200 --> 0:09:58.800
<v Speaker 1>were sweating that one out, which if you listen to

0:09:58.880 --> 0:10:00.880
<v Speaker 1>us yesterday, we said we liked the Steelers, and we

0:10:00.880 --> 0:10:02.400
<v Speaker 1>said not to touch you over under because it was

0:10:02.440 --> 0:10:05.080
<v Speaker 1>gonna be close. And it was on that when it

0:10:05.120 --> 0:10:06.840
<v Speaker 1>was thirty twenty, I was like, all right, you know,

0:10:06.880 --> 0:10:08.880
<v Speaker 1>if the Steelers can hold the Bucks, will field go here,

0:10:09.440 --> 0:10:12.440
<v Speaker 1>we'll get it right three maybe the game can end

0:10:12.440 --> 0:10:14.480
<v Speaker 1>that way. But they scored a touchdown and then that

0:10:14.520 --> 0:10:17.640
<v Speaker 1>gives me. But it was close, yeah, absolutely over under.

0:10:17.679 --> 0:10:20.360
<v Speaker 1>The over runder was closed quite obviously. Um, and we

0:10:20.520 --> 0:10:22.800
<v Speaker 1>like we like to Steelers. We were I means I went, oh,

0:10:22.880 --> 0:10:24.880
<v Speaker 1>I means I went to one of my picks. Great,

0:10:26.400 --> 0:10:28.800
<v Speaker 1>and I got Peyton Barbara wrong, but I got right. Yeah.

0:10:28.840 --> 0:10:30.400
<v Speaker 1>So that's where I actually went to Google look up.

0:10:30.440 --> 0:10:32.920
<v Speaker 1>So Barbara started off running the ball well average four

0:10:32.920 --> 0:10:35.360
<v Speaker 1>point one yards for carry, eight carries thirty three yards.

0:10:35.360 --> 0:10:39.559
<v Speaker 1>Obviously got game scripted. Jaquiz Rodgers was by the way, brutal,

0:10:39.800 --> 0:10:42.360
<v Speaker 1>brutal running the ball, brutal pass blocking the ball. I

0:10:42.400 --> 0:10:45.240
<v Speaker 1>don't understand it. I don't understand why he that just

0:10:45.280 --> 0:10:47.120
<v Speaker 1>tells you how low they are and Ronald Jones right

0:10:47.120 --> 0:10:49.480
<v Speaker 1>now that he is not active to the point where

0:10:49.480 --> 0:10:51.920
<v Speaker 1>they have ja Quiz Rodgers just running into the back

0:10:51.960 --> 0:10:54.520
<v Speaker 1>of his offensive line. Um not pass blocking well as

0:10:54.559 --> 0:10:57.760
<v Speaker 1>you mentioned, and then on the target that was a

0:10:57.760 --> 0:10:59.640
<v Speaker 1>pick six. I don't think that was his fault overall,

0:11:00.160 --> 0:11:02.640
<v Speaker 1>Like Ryan Fitzpatrick just overthrew him a little bit, but

0:11:02.760 --> 0:11:06.080
<v Speaker 1>he was involved in that play as well. Yeah, I

0:11:06.080 --> 0:11:07.960
<v Speaker 1>guess so. I think that Ronald Jones and I thought

0:11:07.960 --> 0:11:10.520
<v Speaker 1>maybe it was made sense. You have to hold them

0:11:10.520 --> 0:11:13.600
<v Speaker 1>onto longer or say goodbye. I thought that he would

0:11:13.600 --> 0:11:16.200
<v Speaker 1>be a surprise active for this game. Maybe give him

0:11:16.200 --> 0:11:18.719
<v Speaker 1>a few times, get him involved, you know, sprinkle him

0:11:18.720 --> 0:11:21.000
<v Speaker 1>in with the let all of America and the rest

0:11:21.040 --> 0:11:23.480
<v Speaker 1>of the world get a little taste of Ronald Jones.

0:11:23.520 --> 0:11:25.800
<v Speaker 1>But that obviously did not happen. I've had a lot

0:11:25.840 --> 0:11:28.760
<v Speaker 1>of people asking me how long do I think Ryan

0:11:28.760 --> 0:11:30.720
<v Speaker 1>Fitzpatrick is going to hold onto the job, and I

0:11:30.760 --> 0:11:34.079
<v Speaker 1>think it's a pretty impossible question. Answer. Yeah, it's a

0:11:34.160 --> 0:11:36.439
<v Speaker 1>very impossible question. Answer. He hasn't for Week four, that's

0:11:36.440 --> 0:11:39.040
<v Speaker 1>already been announced. Week five will be the answering. I

0:11:39.080 --> 0:11:42.280
<v Speaker 1>think it will be the first game where Ryan Fitzpatrick

0:11:42.360 --> 0:11:45.120
<v Speaker 1>is Ryan Fitzpatrick and that really like causes them to lose.

0:11:45.360 --> 0:11:49.719
<v Speaker 1>That's where you're gonna start hearing the murmurs. Right, who

0:11:49.760 --> 0:11:52.440
<v Speaker 1>do you live this week? Do you know? I could

0:11:53.920 --> 0:11:58.280
<v Speaker 1>here facing the Bears in Chicago, so that came not

0:11:58.480 --> 0:12:00.560
<v Speaker 1>be a great one tough game. But we'll say this,

0:12:00.840 --> 0:12:04.360
<v Speaker 1>their offenses put up twenty seven I know right, it's

0:12:04.360 --> 0:12:06.600
<v Speaker 1>Patrick through three interceptions, did not look good at times

0:12:06.640 --> 0:12:09.080
<v Speaker 1>last night. You put up twenty seven points a game

0:12:09.880 --> 0:12:13.199
<v Speaker 1>probably not coming out. Oh absolutely, if he does that again,

0:12:13.600 --> 0:12:16.040
<v Speaker 1>then it won't. If he does that again, they should

0:12:16.040 --> 0:12:17.600
<v Speaker 1>either win against the Bears because I don't know if

0:12:17.600 --> 0:12:19.920
<v Speaker 1>the Bears can keep up with them, or they'll lose

0:12:19.920 --> 0:12:23.079
<v Speaker 1>because their defense was absolutely terrible. Ye could definitely be

0:12:23.120 --> 0:12:26.000
<v Speaker 1>a possibility easily. Uh. The NFC South by the Way,

0:12:26.040 --> 0:12:28.400
<v Speaker 1>Tampa Bay, New Orleans, Carolina all sit at two in one,

0:12:28.440 --> 0:12:32.000
<v Speaker 1>Atlanta one game back at one and two. We should

0:12:32.360 --> 0:12:35.319
<v Speaker 1>also note that the matchups they've had, we know now

0:12:35.360 --> 0:12:37.880
<v Speaker 1>that the Saints defense is terrible, Like it is back

0:12:37.920 --> 0:12:40.400
<v Speaker 1>to being the Saints defense from two years ago and

0:12:40.679 --> 0:12:43.320
<v Speaker 1>every other year that Drew Brees was their quarterback. And

0:12:43.920 --> 0:12:45.080
<v Speaker 1>I think the same thing could be said for the

0:12:45.080 --> 0:12:48.600
<v Speaker 1>Pittsburgh Steelers too. They're just not good. So those are

0:12:48.600 --> 0:12:50.760
<v Speaker 1>teams that you really want to attack. When we see

0:12:50.760 --> 0:12:53.720
<v Speaker 1>those high over under totals game totals for the against

0:12:53.720 --> 0:12:56.240
<v Speaker 1>the Steelers and against the Saints, those games are gonna

0:12:56.240 --> 0:12:59.560
<v Speaker 1>be shootouts. Um, Philadelphia, I think that was a game

0:12:59.640 --> 0:13:03.000
<v Speaker 1>where Ryan Fitzpatrick really showed out there. They still do

0:13:03.040 --> 0:13:05.679
<v Speaker 1>have some deficiencies against the past. We know how good

0:13:05.720 --> 0:13:08.120
<v Speaker 1>their front seven is. They limit the run all the time,

0:13:08.280 --> 0:13:09.800
<v Speaker 1>but that was still impressive to do that against the

0:13:09.800 --> 0:13:13.320
<v Speaker 1>Eagles defense. I thought so. I thought so too. Um,

0:13:13.480 --> 0:13:16.440
<v Speaker 1>Pittsburgh next week has Baltimore, which is it was an

0:13:16.440 --> 0:13:18.800
<v Speaker 1>interesting spot. It has McDonald obviously had a huge game

0:13:19.360 --> 0:13:22.800
<v Speaker 1>last night. Jesse James was extremely quiet after his huge

0:13:22.840 --> 0:13:27.599
<v Speaker 1>game the week before. Um. Yeah, so I don't I

0:13:27.600 --> 0:13:30.319
<v Speaker 1>don't know what to make it necessarily, Antonio Brown. Um,

0:13:30.320 --> 0:13:33.320
<v Speaker 1>going forward, it's gonna all have from the NFL ball.

0:13:33.320 --> 0:13:37.200
<v Speaker 1>I'm kind of just dragging now. Yeah, Dealers and Bucks.

0:13:37.440 --> 0:13:40.120
<v Speaker 1>It's over. We're on to week four where we finally

0:13:40.160 --> 0:13:43.320
<v Speaker 1>get two teams on by the Washington Football team and

0:13:43.360 --> 0:13:45.959
<v Speaker 1>the Carolina Panthers. Carolina Washington on by which means the

0:13:45.960 --> 0:13:49.959
<v Speaker 1>BFS have to start Dak Prescot. That might be correct,

0:13:50.160 --> 0:13:53.600
<v Speaker 1>and we have no a Dream Peterson, so we're screwed. Really,

0:13:53.840 --> 0:13:56.880
<v Speaker 1>that's that's an issue. I'm looking at our team. I'm

0:13:56.880 --> 0:13:58.400
<v Speaker 1>looking at our team now. So you're gonna have to

0:13:58.440 --> 0:14:01.120
<v Speaker 1>find ways to replace Christian mccaffe and we're gonna do

0:14:01.200 --> 0:14:03.320
<v Speaker 1>a Waiver Wire episode today. But there's not a lot

0:14:03.360 --> 0:14:07.640
<v Speaker 1>of fresh converses Detroit. You're in the line up. Nice? Great?

0:14:07.880 --> 0:14:12.080
<v Speaker 1>Oh you start Aaron Jones. I don't have a choice.

0:14:12.800 --> 0:14:15.640
<v Speaker 1>Start Aaron Jones and Jamal Williams. Always fun, Greg, We

0:14:15.640 --> 0:14:18.600
<v Speaker 1>could do that. We can also start Frank Gore. Yeah,

0:14:18.679 --> 0:14:21.360
<v Speaker 1>good times. You start mark mark ingram On on a

0:14:21.440 --> 0:14:25.160
<v Speaker 1>suspension might do better than Frank Gore had similar fantasy

0:14:25.160 --> 0:14:28.880
<v Speaker 1>production last week. That's true. Yeah, so the bodies do

0:14:28.960 --> 0:14:31.120
<v Speaker 1>start this week Thursday. That football man with the rams

0:14:31.120 --> 0:14:32.840
<v Speaker 1>of the Bikings that is tough as the guy that

0:14:32.880 --> 0:14:35.600
<v Speaker 1>owns Robert Woods and Cooper Cup. I don't know what

0:14:35.760 --> 0:14:39.960
<v Speaker 1>to do. Yeah, I mean, I'm gonna continue to say

0:14:40.040 --> 0:14:41.720
<v Speaker 1>what I've said. Oh year, I think Cooper Cup is

0:14:41.760 --> 0:14:43.560
<v Speaker 1>the safest of all of them when they go up

0:14:43.600 --> 0:14:46.520
<v Speaker 1>against teams that have strong outside cornerbacks. Which the Vikings

0:14:46.560 --> 0:14:49.440
<v Speaker 1>obviously do with Xavier Rhodes and Trey Wayne. So I'm

0:14:49.440 --> 0:14:51.080
<v Speaker 1>going to continue to ride that. I think Cooper Cup

0:14:51.120 --> 0:14:55.160
<v Speaker 1>is the safest guy. But again, Robert Woods and Brandon Cooks,

0:14:55.200 --> 0:14:57.960
<v Speaker 1>they're kind of proving that their matchup proof regardless, right

0:14:57.960 --> 0:14:59.440
<v Speaker 1>Like if a team tries to shut them down one,

0:14:59.640 --> 0:15:01.600
<v Speaker 1>then are just gonna go to Robert Wood a ton,

0:15:01.640 --> 0:15:03.680
<v Speaker 1>which is what we saw last week. And Brandon Cooks

0:15:03.680 --> 0:15:05.480
<v Speaker 1>by all means still did not have a bad game.

0:15:05.640 --> 0:15:07.680
<v Speaker 1>No he didn't. They all have safe floors and they

0:15:07.880 --> 0:15:09.960
<v Speaker 1>have are proving now that they all have big ceilings

0:15:10.000 --> 0:15:11.840
<v Speaker 1>as well. You know, It's really interesting is the other side,

0:15:11.880 --> 0:15:13.760
<v Speaker 1>right Marcus Peters Oup tune to four weeks. I keeps

0:15:13.800 --> 0:15:18.320
<v Speaker 1>to leave potentially done for the year. Absolutely brutal injuries

0:15:18.360 --> 0:15:20.840
<v Speaker 1>in the secondary for the Rams, and if their defense

0:15:20.920 --> 0:15:22.400
<v Speaker 1>is letting up points, it's only going to be good

0:15:22.440 --> 0:15:24.160
<v Speaker 1>for the offense. You're just gonna have to keep pushing

0:15:24.200 --> 0:15:27.200
<v Speaker 1>and pushing and pushing. And I know taking the over

0:15:27.280 --> 0:15:29.520
<v Speaker 1>on a Thursday night game, especially at fourty nine and

0:15:29.520 --> 0:15:31.880
<v Speaker 1>a half, seems crazy, but I think there's gonna be

0:15:31.920 --> 0:15:33.560
<v Speaker 1>some point scored in this game. I think the Vikings

0:15:33.600 --> 0:15:35.480
<v Speaker 1>are going to bounce back in a big way. I

0:15:35.480 --> 0:15:37.920
<v Speaker 1>mean to get embarrassed against the Buffalo Bills the way

0:15:37.920 --> 0:15:41.080
<v Speaker 1>that they did. We spoke about it yesterday. How that's

0:15:41.120 --> 0:15:45.480
<v Speaker 1>the biggest upset in like twenty three, TWI years something

0:15:45.480 --> 0:15:48.640
<v Speaker 1>like that. And especially with those Rams cornerbacks out, greg,

0:15:48.640 --> 0:15:50.960
<v Speaker 1>I think Adam Feeling and Stefon Diggs are going to

0:15:51.000 --> 0:15:53.960
<v Speaker 1>be in for big games. Not only that, the Rams

0:15:54.000 --> 0:15:57.280
<v Speaker 1>haven't been great at shutting down tight ends this year either. Um,

0:15:58.040 --> 0:16:00.360
<v Speaker 1>so yeah, it looks like all three of the main

0:16:00.520 --> 0:16:03.520
<v Speaker 1>pass catching options in Minnesota are going to be in

0:16:03.640 --> 0:16:07.560
<v Speaker 1>four productive weeks on Thursday against the Los Angeles Rams. Yeah,

0:16:07.600 --> 0:16:12.800
<v Speaker 1>it's it'll be obviously something you're gonna have to monitor. Um,

0:16:12.880 --> 0:16:14.720
<v Speaker 1>it's just tough for me, man, I am not gonna

0:16:14.720 --> 0:16:15.840
<v Speaker 1>know what to do. I'm not gonna know what to

0:16:15.840 --> 0:16:17.240
<v Speaker 1>do with that. I'm not gonna know what to do

0:16:17.360 --> 0:16:20.600
<v Speaker 1>with Just start both start both friends wide receivers. Why

0:16:20.640 --> 0:16:23.760
<v Speaker 1>wouldn't you? Who else do you play? The Vikings have

0:16:25.200 --> 0:16:30.600
<v Speaker 1>Calmen Ridley, Kay, who else? It's just a team where

0:16:30.640 --> 0:16:33.080
<v Speaker 1>you have bad flex options. Oh, this is a good team.

0:16:33.440 --> 0:16:34.880
<v Speaker 1>This is this one and two. It's like it's a

0:16:34.920 --> 0:16:37.480
<v Speaker 1>good team though, Like I put, this is a good

0:16:37.480 --> 0:16:39.360
<v Speaker 1>one and too, I have a bunch of points. I

0:16:39.720 --> 0:16:41.360
<v Speaker 1>feel good about this team. The other one, there's just

0:16:41.400 --> 0:16:43.760
<v Speaker 1>no hope you're gonna start Jordan Wilkins again this week.

0:16:43.880 --> 0:16:48.760
<v Speaker 1>I can't start start sending out those Odell Beckham for

0:16:48.800 --> 0:16:51.600
<v Speaker 1>three player trades and yesterday man I proposed I told

0:16:51.640 --> 0:16:53.560
<v Speaker 1>you you were around with the yesterday when I was

0:16:53.560 --> 0:16:56.760
<v Speaker 1>proposing trades, I proposed good trades Odell Beckam, Rackina now

0:16:56.800 --> 0:17:01.280
<v Speaker 1>and Marshall Marshawn Lynch fair trade. Yeah, I'd say that

0:17:01.480 --> 0:17:04.920
<v Speaker 1>that's I'd probably if I was the other owner, I'd

0:17:04.920 --> 0:17:07.000
<v Speaker 1>probably want another piece and return just something he wanted

0:17:07.000 --> 0:17:09.639
<v Speaker 1>me to throw. Ronald Jones, I said sure, So are

0:17:09.640 --> 0:17:11.480
<v Speaker 1>you gonna do it? I said yes, and then he

0:17:11.520 --> 0:17:14.439
<v Speaker 1>has to said yes to think about it. Okay, sleep on.

0:17:14.520 --> 0:17:18.399
<v Speaker 1>It is that Max? No, that's not Max. Waiver wire

0:17:18.760 --> 0:17:21.640
<v Speaker 1>pulls money if he hasn't even left data break. We'll

0:17:21.680 --> 0:17:24.560
<v Speaker 1>take into the wavor wire, particularly the rod receivers running Max.

0:17:24.720 --> 0:17:31.360
<v Speaker 1>What's your way next? Daily rodo dot Com learned from

0:17:31.359 --> 0:17:34.680
<v Speaker 1>the game's best DFS players. We don't just give you

0:17:34.760 --> 0:17:39.880
<v Speaker 1>premier advice. We played every day all major sports all

0:17:40.000 --> 0:17:43.919
<v Speaker 1>year round. We never stopped industry leading DFS tools and

0:17:44.000 --> 0:17:48.280
<v Speaker 1>custom projections, and now the Daily Roado dot Com optimized

0:17:48.560 --> 0:17:52.280
<v Speaker 1>in minutes building optimize line for cash games and turneys

0:17:52.640 --> 0:17:56.240
<v Speaker 1>learned from the game's best DFS players joined Daily Roado

0:17:56.520 --> 0:18:09.040
<v Speaker 1>dot Com. I thought we banned the song from the

0:18:09.080 --> 0:18:13.840
<v Speaker 1>show We Want to Pick with Bi Bona. We banned it.

0:18:14.640 --> 0:18:17.040
<v Speaker 1>He said, We're not doing it. He said, We're not

0:18:17.080 --> 0:18:21.919
<v Speaker 1>doing this get knocked in that again. People wanted, people

0:18:22.000 --> 0:18:23.879
<v Speaker 1>wanted us to do this as a theme, and we

0:18:23.880 --> 0:18:26.240
<v Speaker 1>were just like, absolutely not. Do you not remember that

0:18:26.280 --> 0:18:30.480
<v Speaker 1>whole thing, Frank Craig that I remember. I do not

0:18:30.600 --> 0:18:34.160
<v Speaker 1>remember this song being banned, but I'll never play it again.

0:18:34.200 --> 0:18:36.760
<v Speaker 1>I apologize, thank you, Thank you very much. Chriss. I

0:18:36.760 --> 0:18:38.560
<v Speaker 1>wasn't I wasn't mad at you. I was just you know,

0:18:38.600 --> 0:18:40.159
<v Speaker 1>I didn't I never said you were mad at I

0:18:40.200 --> 0:18:43.359
<v Speaker 1>just didn't want Frank to start singing and then get

0:18:43.440 --> 0:18:46.159
<v Speaker 1>knocked in that. Ds I is celebrating twenty years is

0:18:46.160 --> 0:18:48.280
<v Speaker 1>the industry's biggest and save us betting site. They have

0:18:48.359 --> 0:18:51.439
<v Speaker 1>great customer service, fast, easy payment, winnings. You play virtually

0:18:51.480 --> 0:18:53.320
<v Speaker 1>every sport at met D s I with hundreds of

0:18:53.320 --> 0:18:56.400
<v Speaker 1>wagering options, including live in game wagering on all major

0:18:56.440 --> 0:18:58.960
<v Speaker 1>sporting events, where you can make your play and any

0:18:59.000 --> 0:19:01.439
<v Speaker 1>time during the game. Bet ds eyes now offering up

0:19:01.480 --> 0:19:03.800
<v Speaker 1>to a thousand dollar bonus on your first deposit when

0:19:03.800 --> 0:19:06.600
<v Speaker 1>you use the promo code f and T s Y.

0:19:06.680 --> 0:19:09.760
<v Speaker 1>That's bet ds dot Com. The promo code is f

0:19:10.040 --> 0:19:12.720
<v Speaker 1>and T s Y, So head on over to bet

0:19:12.800 --> 0:19:16.960
<v Speaker 1>ds I and start winning today. Back with you here

0:19:16.960 --> 0:19:22.560
<v Speaker 1>on the Fantasy Best Friends Forever Fantasy Sports Radio Network, Frankie,

0:19:23.600 --> 0:19:25.119
<v Speaker 1>I want at the end of the wide receiver ads

0:19:25.160 --> 0:19:26.880
<v Speaker 1>for this week, and I was talking to you during

0:19:26.880 --> 0:19:29.960
<v Speaker 1>the break about a particular one in Arizona. Josh Rosen's

0:19:29.960 --> 0:19:32.160
<v Speaker 1>the starting quarterback for the Cardinals. We knew that much.

0:19:33.240 --> 0:19:36.800
<v Speaker 1>Does is show an imp an uptick in production from

0:19:36.840 --> 0:19:40.720
<v Speaker 1>Larry Fitzgerald? Quite possibly, sure, But what I'm most interested

0:19:40.760 --> 0:19:46.680
<v Speaker 1>in is Christian Kirk is pretty much available everywhere, right,

0:19:46.680 --> 0:19:51.560
<v Speaker 1>Like we're talking of leagues or so, how much you

0:19:51.560 --> 0:19:55.000
<v Speaker 1>spending on Christian Kirk in the waighbor wider, especially in

0:19:55.080 --> 0:19:58.000
<v Speaker 1>deeper leagues where he's likely the best option available. I'm

0:19:58.040 --> 0:20:00.320
<v Speaker 1>willing to go as high as seven or eight percent

0:20:00.400 --> 0:20:04.560
<v Speaker 1>of my remaining fab budget um because I'm interested in

0:20:04.560 --> 0:20:06.359
<v Speaker 1>what he could do. With Josh Rosen, we spoke about

0:20:06.359 --> 0:20:09.000
<v Speaker 1>this a lot last year and the year before. Whenever

0:20:09.040 --> 0:20:11.560
<v Speaker 1>we get a backup quarterback or a rookie quarterback coming in,

0:20:11.880 --> 0:20:14.160
<v Speaker 1>who's going to get an opportunity to start? You want

0:20:14.160 --> 0:20:16.080
<v Speaker 1>to see who? Did they get to work with a

0:20:16.119 --> 0:20:18.359
<v Speaker 1>lot throughout the preseason when they were running with the two's,

0:20:18.680 --> 0:20:21.080
<v Speaker 1>that's gonna be Christian Kirk. Josh Rosen worked a lot

0:20:21.119 --> 0:20:23.840
<v Speaker 1>with him. They're both rookie players obviously coming in they

0:20:23.880 --> 0:20:27.760
<v Speaker 1>were They had rookie minicamp together. So basically as long

0:20:27.800 --> 0:20:31.480
<v Speaker 1>as they've been professionals with the Arizona Cardinals, they've worked together.

0:20:31.640 --> 0:20:34.880
<v Speaker 1>And Christian kirkerk saw an uptick last week. He played

0:20:34.920 --> 0:20:37.880
<v Speaker 1>seventy percent of the offensive snaps. He's actually gotten better,

0:20:37.960 --> 0:20:41.639
<v Speaker 1>which with each passing week so far to this NFL season,

0:20:41.800 --> 0:20:43.879
<v Speaker 1>I will say that he his seventy four percent of

0:20:43.920 --> 0:20:46.240
<v Speaker 1>snaps was still third on the team, behind both Chad

0:20:46.280 --> 0:20:49.800
<v Speaker 1>Williams and Larry Fitzgerald, but he led them in Week

0:20:49.840 --> 0:20:53.200
<v Speaker 1>three and targets with eight receptions with seven receiving yards

0:20:53.240 --> 0:20:56.280
<v Speaker 1>with ninety air yards with seventy one, which is interesting,

0:20:56.359 --> 0:20:59.800
<v Speaker 1>and in yards after the catch with thirty two, It's

0:20:59.800 --> 0:21:01.960
<v Speaker 1>still seems like Larry Fitzgerald is going to play the

0:21:01.960 --> 0:21:05.040
<v Speaker 1>snap the slot for this team, playing forty five of

0:21:05.119 --> 0:21:08.120
<v Speaker 1>fifty two of his snaps inside the slot. Christian Kirk,

0:21:08.200 --> 0:21:10.480
<v Speaker 1>that was a position that he played most in college.

0:21:10.520 --> 0:21:12.399
<v Speaker 1>He played as a slot receiver when he was at

0:21:12.440 --> 0:21:15.640
<v Speaker 1>Texas A and m fourteen of forty five snaps this

0:21:15.720 --> 0:21:19.160
<v Speaker 1>week in the slot. So it reminds me a little bit.

0:21:19.200 --> 0:21:24.440
<v Speaker 1>And I saw I believe it was. I think it

0:21:24.600 --> 0:21:28.359
<v Speaker 1>was was it It was either Grand Barfield or Scott.

0:21:28.400 --> 0:21:30.280
<v Speaker 1>I think it was Scott Barrett. Scott Barrett was speaking

0:21:30.280 --> 0:21:33.320
<v Speaker 1>about how it reminds him of Nelson Aglar. Nelson Aglo

0:21:33.359 --> 0:21:34.840
<v Speaker 1>was courts to the outside when he first came into

0:21:34.880 --> 0:21:36.600
<v Speaker 1>the league and he was really not good. And the

0:21:36.600 --> 0:21:38.960
<v Speaker 1>when he's allowed to play the slot again last year,

0:21:39.440 --> 0:21:41.879
<v Speaker 1>he excelled in that. So I do worry about that

0:21:41.920 --> 0:21:43.959
<v Speaker 1>with Kirk, but I like the fact that he has

0:21:44.040 --> 0:21:46.959
<v Speaker 1>familiarity with Josh rosen Um, so I'm willing to go

0:21:47.000 --> 0:21:50.000
<v Speaker 1>as high as seven eight percent. I think he among

0:21:50.040 --> 0:21:52.119
<v Speaker 1>all these wide receivers. We're gonna talk about is the

0:21:52.160 --> 0:21:54.760
<v Speaker 1>most widely available and as a guy who can contribute

0:21:54.800 --> 0:21:59.480
<v Speaker 1>right away. Yeah, so I think ultimately your theory of

0:21:59.640 --> 0:22:01.879
<v Speaker 1>the back the backup quarterback with the backup wide receiver,

0:22:02.200 --> 0:22:05.600
<v Speaker 1>it makes sense. You grow together, and certainly early around rookies,

0:22:05.640 --> 0:22:08.720
<v Speaker 1>they probably have a room together and practicing together, um

0:22:08.760 --> 0:22:10.880
<v Speaker 1>since the beginning, and I think there is something there.

0:22:10.920 --> 0:22:13.320
<v Speaker 1>You saw it, Christian Kirk targeted a few times when

0:22:13.400 --> 0:22:15.880
<v Speaker 1>Josh Rosen came in on that last drive of the game.

0:22:16.119 --> 0:22:18.720
<v Speaker 1>Now it's certainly easier to use your tight end to

0:22:18.840 --> 0:22:21.280
<v Speaker 1>use your veteran wide receiver and Larry Fitzgerald and a

0:22:21.359 --> 0:22:23.639
<v Speaker 1>Ricky Seals Jones. I think that makes sense for me

0:22:23.680 --> 0:22:25.960
<v Speaker 1>when it comes to video. Christian Kirk, I'm only in

0:22:26.080 --> 0:22:27.520
<v Speaker 1>a bit a few dollars. I think there's some better

0:22:27.520 --> 0:22:30.080
<v Speaker 1>wide receivers that are out there. I'm not blowing the budget.

0:22:30.119 --> 0:22:32.240
<v Speaker 1>I'm not buying into the Cardinals offense all of a

0:22:32.240 --> 0:22:37.399
<v Speaker 1>sudden exploding because I don't think it will. Um. I

0:22:37.400 --> 0:22:39.240
<v Speaker 1>don't think the offense is going to be worse with

0:22:39.359 --> 0:22:41.360
<v Speaker 1>Josh Rosen than it was. It can't be. It can't be.

0:22:41.720 --> 0:22:44.960
<v Speaker 1>Josh coming into Week three with the Cardinals offense had

0:22:45.000 --> 0:22:48.440
<v Speaker 1>scored six points. Sam Bradford was not throwing the ball

0:22:48.480 --> 0:22:50.440
<v Speaker 1>downfield at all. I think he was throwing the ball

0:22:50.480 --> 0:22:52.720
<v Speaker 1>more behind the line of scrimmage, and he was actually

0:22:53.320 --> 0:22:55.600
<v Speaker 1>beyond the line of scrimmage. So he was literally just

0:22:55.640 --> 0:22:58.080
<v Speaker 1>a checkdown king, a guy who got paid twenty million

0:22:58.119 --> 0:23:00.320
<v Speaker 1>dollars in the off season to come in and just

0:23:00.400 --> 0:23:02.440
<v Speaker 1>check the ball down. For the Arizona Cardinals, it's a

0:23:02.480 --> 0:23:04.760
<v Speaker 1>bad job by them. I will agree with you that

0:23:04.920 --> 0:23:07.639
<v Speaker 1>it's still not an ideal offense. Their offensive line is

0:23:07.680 --> 0:23:10.239
<v Speaker 1>not great. Um, So Josh Rosen's gonna see a lot

0:23:10.240 --> 0:23:13.439
<v Speaker 1>of pressure, especially in his first career start against the

0:23:13.520 --> 0:23:16.640
<v Speaker 1>Chicago Bears on the road. So I'm not saying I'm

0:23:16.640 --> 0:23:18.639
<v Speaker 1>gonna get Christian Kirk in my lineup right away, but

0:23:18.680 --> 0:23:20.399
<v Speaker 1>he's a guy I want to pick up and see

0:23:20.440 --> 0:23:23.399
<v Speaker 1>what report is like with Josh Orden has a starting quarterback.

0:23:23.480 --> 0:23:25.720
<v Speaker 1>We talked about rapport, and we talked about waiting and seeing.

0:23:25.760 --> 0:23:27.440
<v Speaker 1>You can no longer wait and see on a guy

0:23:27.440 --> 0:23:29.720
<v Speaker 1>like Tyler boy because A J. Green heard his groin

0:23:30.320 --> 0:23:31.840
<v Speaker 1>at the end or the really the beginning of the

0:23:31.840 --> 0:23:34.560
<v Speaker 1>second half UM in Week number three, and Tyler boyd

0:23:34.600 --> 0:23:37.280
<v Speaker 1>went off his first career a hundred yard game, UM,

0:23:37.600 --> 0:23:39.560
<v Speaker 1>and that's a lot of that was with a J.

0:23:39.720 --> 0:23:42.240
<v Speaker 1>Green in the line of Tyler boy has certainly emerged

0:23:42.280 --> 0:23:45.520
<v Speaker 1>this year for the Cincinnati Bengals, and yet according to

0:23:45.560 --> 0:23:48.880
<v Speaker 1>CBS Leagues, he's only owned in under thirty percent of leagues.

0:23:49.040 --> 0:23:52.920
<v Speaker 1>People were not buying in frank last week. Now he

0:23:53.040 --> 0:23:55.240
<v Speaker 1>cost you know too, three four or five, six, seven

0:23:55.280 --> 0:23:58.080
<v Speaker 1>eight dollars last week. Now you're in the double digits

0:23:58.119 --> 0:23:59.720
<v Speaker 1>because costing you over ten percent of your budgets to

0:23:59.720 --> 0:24:02.920
<v Speaker 1>go out and get Tyler Boyd. Now this week, Boyd

0:24:02.960 --> 0:24:05.359
<v Speaker 1>is one of those waiver wire finds that desperate for me,

0:24:05.400 --> 0:24:07.240
<v Speaker 1>Like I wasn't a flex and it's been enough on

0:24:07.320 --> 0:24:09.040
<v Speaker 1>him last week. I'm gonna check my bid when when

0:24:09.040 --> 0:24:11.520
<v Speaker 1>you start talking. But it's been enough and I didn't

0:24:11.560 --> 0:24:14.000
<v Speaker 1>get a Tyler Boyd who now is the number one

0:24:14.000 --> 0:24:17.280
<v Speaker 1>wide receiver for Cincinnati. UM with a J. Green out

0:24:17.320 --> 0:24:19.879
<v Speaker 1>if he is out. But certainly his mark is made

0:24:19.920 --> 0:24:22.760
<v Speaker 1>with the Bengals, yes, for sure. And I was aggressive

0:24:22.800 --> 0:24:25.200
<v Speaker 1>on him on him last week in the Flex League.

0:24:25.200 --> 0:24:27.879
<v Speaker 1>I spent thirteen dollars on him in a one dollar budget.

0:24:27.960 --> 0:24:31.040
<v Speaker 1>So I believe we said anywhere from like nine to

0:24:31.160 --> 0:24:34.680
<v Speaker 1>eleven percent last week on him. That number this week

0:24:34.760 --> 0:24:37.199
<v Speaker 1>is going to grow to over he went, gonna have

0:24:37.240 --> 0:24:39.800
<v Speaker 1>to be he went in my league last week just

0:24:39.800 --> 0:24:41.720
<v Speaker 1>for example, like I said, seven dollars right over that

0:24:41.800 --> 0:24:44.680
<v Speaker 1>seven eight range I had been three. Now it's cost

0:24:44.720 --> 0:24:47.479
<v Speaker 1>me in a major way. Yeah, it's again, it's gonna go.

0:24:47.520 --> 0:24:50.000
<v Speaker 1>You're gonna have to spend twenty percent if you want

0:24:50.000 --> 0:24:51.840
<v Speaker 1>to get him. He has twenty one targets on the season.

0:24:51.880 --> 0:24:54.640
<v Speaker 1>Greg that's eighteen percent of the target share last week.

0:24:54.680 --> 0:24:57.639
<v Speaker 1>A hundred and thirty two yards. I thought this was

0:24:57.680 --> 0:25:00.879
<v Speaker 1>really interesting. A D thirteen air yards, thirty nine yards

0:25:00.880 --> 0:25:03.320
<v Speaker 1>after the catch, sixteen point one a dot. So he's

0:25:03.320 --> 0:25:05.600
<v Speaker 1>working both in the slot and on the outside, but

0:25:05.640 --> 0:25:08.199
<v Speaker 1>he's not being used as just a traditional slot receiver

0:25:08.280 --> 0:25:11.159
<v Speaker 1>that runs quick slants and runs routes close to the

0:25:11.200 --> 0:25:13.720
<v Speaker 1>line of scrimmage. He's being used down the field. They're

0:25:13.720 --> 0:25:16.480
<v Speaker 1>targeting him on deep passes as well. You can see

0:25:16.480 --> 0:25:18.280
<v Speaker 1>that in his area yards and and in his A

0:25:18.440 --> 0:25:21.960
<v Speaker 1>dot all all of those categories lead the Bengals in

0:25:22.040 --> 0:25:24.600
<v Speaker 1>Week three. That was obviously with A. J. Green a

0:25:24.600 --> 0:25:27.040
<v Speaker 1>little bit banged up, but it will say his targets

0:25:27.040 --> 0:25:29.760
<v Speaker 1>were still just at seven last week. On the season,

0:25:29.800 --> 0:25:31.840
<v Speaker 1>he does have twenty one targets eighteen percent of the

0:25:31.840 --> 0:25:34.120
<v Speaker 1>target shore. That's second on the team, but last week

0:25:34.160 --> 0:25:38.320
<v Speaker 1>he was behind Giovanni Bernard, Tyler Eiffort, A J. Green Um.

0:25:38.359 --> 0:25:40.720
<v Speaker 1>But I'm still willing to go as high as twenty

0:25:41.160 --> 0:25:44.680
<v Speaker 1>if you really really need the wide receiver help um,

0:25:44.720 --> 0:25:46.880
<v Speaker 1>and especially with A J. Green banged up this week.

0:25:46.960 --> 0:25:49.080
<v Speaker 1>I know that A J. Green wants to play because

0:25:49.080 --> 0:25:52.240
<v Speaker 1>he's going back home in Atlanta where he played college

0:25:52.240 --> 0:25:55.000
<v Speaker 1>ball at Georgia, and him and Julio Jones have kind

0:25:55.040 --> 0:25:56.920
<v Speaker 1>of been compared to each other as long as they've

0:25:56.920 --> 0:25:58.600
<v Speaker 1>been in the league. They were in the same draft together.

0:25:58.720 --> 0:26:00.560
<v Speaker 1>So I know A J. Green wants to it out there,

0:26:01.119 --> 0:26:03.439
<v Speaker 1>but groin injuries are really, really tricky. I don't know

0:26:03.480 --> 0:26:05.480
<v Speaker 1>that he's going to be able to And if A J.

0:26:05.600 --> 0:26:09.919
<v Speaker 1>Green can't go, Tyler Boyd crazy enough to say you

0:26:10.000 --> 0:26:11.880
<v Speaker 1>might be a top twenty four wide receiver this week.

0:26:11.880 --> 0:26:13.960
<v Speaker 1>Greig based on all the injuries to the to the

0:26:14.000 --> 0:26:21.640
<v Speaker 1>Falcon secondary. As you see the Corey Parson from then

0:26:21.680 --> 0:26:24.240
<v Speaker 1>starts talking to me. A lot of cameras producer Corey

0:26:24.240 --> 0:26:26.760
<v Speaker 1>Parson joining the show and there you go. Producer Corey

0:26:26.800 --> 0:26:32.480
<v Speaker 1>Parson has a nice ring to it. It's unbelievable Corey

0:26:32.560 --> 0:26:35.520
<v Speaker 1>Parson on the Ones and two. But you're right A J. Green, Um,

0:26:35.840 --> 0:26:37.840
<v Speaker 1>those groin injuries do tend to linger. Will hear more

0:26:37.840 --> 0:26:41.280
<v Speaker 1>about them from Inside Injuries on Thursday with Virginia and

0:26:41.359 --> 0:26:44.280
<v Speaker 1>with Dr a Um. Tyler Boyd the number one guy

0:26:44.280 --> 0:26:46.359
<v Speaker 1>out there. I said, it's gonna cost you quite a

0:26:46.400 --> 0:26:49.919
<v Speaker 1>bit of money probably, I think of your budget at

0:26:49.920 --> 0:26:52.760
<v Speaker 1>this point. If you're hurting for wide receiver, I'm willing

0:26:52.800 --> 0:26:54.800
<v Speaker 1>to go as high in my budget makes sense. I

0:26:54.800 --> 0:26:56.480
<v Speaker 1>think I think you have to be Corey on the

0:26:56.480 --> 0:26:59.280
<v Speaker 1>Frenzy yesterday started out a show saying, listen, Tyler Boyd

0:26:59.720 --> 0:27:05.000
<v Speaker 1>is is the guy in Cincinnati. A J. Green Old news, Oh,

0:27:05.160 --> 0:27:08.400
<v Speaker 1>Corey Pawson that a lot of things to Julio Jones

0:27:08.440 --> 0:27:12.199
<v Speaker 1>has done. Also, Calvin Realley better than Julio Jones. Absolutely,

0:27:12.800 --> 0:27:14.879
<v Speaker 1>it might be better than maybe the more information like that.

0:27:14.960 --> 0:27:17.159
<v Speaker 1>You have to check out fantas football friends, because your

0:27:17.160 --> 0:27:20.400
<v Speaker 1>way about a half hour from now. Um, Calvial really

0:27:20.480 --> 0:27:22.119
<v Speaker 1>let's spak about him. He's on the lot He's on

0:27:22.480 --> 0:27:26.840
<v Speaker 1>and stashed pretty much everywhere right or so leagues. I

0:27:26.840 --> 0:27:28.680
<v Speaker 1>would say, if he is available in ten team leagues

0:27:28.680 --> 0:27:29.800
<v Speaker 1>and one, do you go out and pick him up

0:27:29.880 --> 0:27:32.000
<v Speaker 1>nuber two, how much you spending? Yeah? Absolutely, he's a

0:27:32.080 --> 0:27:35.359
<v Speaker 1>must owned player. Like I was mentioning yesterday when people

0:27:35.359 --> 0:27:37.919
<v Speaker 1>were asking me ken both him and Julio Jones have

0:27:37.960 --> 0:27:40.800
<v Speaker 1>value together. I think that's absolutely possible. Julio Jones is

0:27:40.800 --> 0:27:43.240
<v Speaker 1>still a wide receiver one for fantasy, and I'm pushing

0:27:43.240 --> 0:27:45.639
<v Speaker 1>Calvin Ridley inside my top thirty six. I think he

0:27:45.760 --> 0:27:48.600
<v Speaker 1>is a viable wide receiver three. Now, he still might

0:27:48.720 --> 0:27:52.160
<v Speaker 1>be boom or busty because Mohammed Sanu is playing more

0:27:52.160 --> 0:27:55.280
<v Speaker 1>snaps in him, but Alvin Ridley is getting targeted more

0:27:56.160 --> 0:27:58.280
<v Speaker 1>of the target share over the last two weeks at

0:27:58.359 --> 0:28:00.760
<v Speaker 1>his second most on the team, behind only Julio Jones.

0:28:01.040 --> 0:28:05.399
<v Speaker 1>But during that span, greg Calvin Ridley thirteen targets, eleven receptions,

0:28:05.520 --> 0:28:10.000
<v Speaker 1>two ten yards, four touchdowns, fifty seven point two PPR points.

0:28:10.119 --> 0:28:13.040
<v Speaker 1>Julio Jones during that same stretch he has more targets.

0:28:13.080 --> 0:28:15.640
<v Speaker 1>If you play in a point per target league, yeah,

0:28:15.640 --> 0:28:18.359
<v Speaker 1>you'll be great with Julio Jones ten receptions. That's one

0:28:18.440 --> 0:28:21.760
<v Speaker 1>lesson Calvin Redley. A hundred and sixty yards. That's fifty

0:28:21.960 --> 0:28:25.760
<v Speaker 1>receiving yards lesson Calvin Redley. You don't need you don't

0:28:25.760 --> 0:28:27.960
<v Speaker 1>need me to tell you this. He has zero touchdowns

0:28:28.080 --> 0:28:32.080
<v Speaker 1>his twenty six PPR points that is thirty one less

0:28:32.160 --> 0:28:35.600
<v Speaker 1>PPR points over the last two weeks. Calvin really absolutely

0:28:35.640 --> 0:28:37.440
<v Speaker 1>needs to be owned, even in a ten team league.

0:28:37.480 --> 0:28:39.320
<v Speaker 1>If he's available in your league, I'm going his highest

0:28:39.320 --> 0:28:43.000
<v Speaker 1>thirty percent of my budget. Greg absolutely loving him. They

0:28:43.080 --> 0:28:46.640
<v Speaker 1>drafted him for a reason, and the fact brought it up.

0:28:46.680 --> 0:28:48.560
<v Speaker 1>You did bring it up. You said they do this

0:28:49.120 --> 0:28:51.760
<v Speaker 1>Roddy White and Julio Jones. They drafted Julio Jones to

0:28:51.920 --> 0:28:54.640
<v Speaker 1>be the successor to Roddy whitep. That's exactly what they did,

0:28:54.760 --> 0:28:57.760
<v Speaker 1>and they still had successful Fantasy years together. I'm not

0:28:57.800 --> 0:28:59.640
<v Speaker 1>here to tell you that Calvin Ridley is just all

0:28:59.640 --> 0:29:01.440
<v Speaker 1>of a sudden gonna take over Julio Jones and be

0:29:01.440 --> 0:29:04.640
<v Speaker 1>the wide receiver one on the team. What can happen

0:29:04.960 --> 0:29:06.600
<v Speaker 1>in two or three years from now? It certainly could,

0:29:06.800 --> 0:29:08.840
<v Speaker 1>and both guys can be Fantasy viable together. We've seen

0:29:08.840 --> 0:29:12.520
<v Speaker 1>it done before. Greg. Now, other wide receivers that could

0:29:12.600 --> 0:29:16.600
<v Speaker 1>be out there this week. Mike Williams on the list

0:29:17.200 --> 0:29:19.200
<v Speaker 1>percent of leagus. I know people love Mike Williams, You, sir,

0:29:19.440 --> 0:29:21.160
<v Speaker 1>love Mike Williams or one of the one of those

0:29:21.200 --> 0:29:25.200
<v Speaker 1>guys Corey mentioned. Keenan Allen is somebody yesterday that falling

0:29:25.240 --> 0:29:27.640
<v Speaker 1>by the wayside, right, Mike Williams stepping up the number

0:29:27.640 --> 0:29:30.120
<v Speaker 1>one wide receiver. We're not just talking yesterday about training

0:29:30.160 --> 0:29:32.920
<v Speaker 1>for Keenan Allen. Um, you said, is he the guy?

0:29:33.320 --> 0:29:35.520
<v Speaker 1>If you're philing? You literally asked me if Philip Rivers

0:29:35.920 --> 0:29:37.800
<v Speaker 1>is in the red zone, are you throwing it keen

0:29:37.880 --> 0:29:40.040
<v Speaker 1>now and or Mike Williams. And my response was, probably

0:29:40.080 --> 0:29:43.040
<v Speaker 1>Mike Williams. If Mike Williams is out there for you

0:29:43.040 --> 0:29:47.240
<v Speaker 1>to spend, I think he's right in the same range

0:29:47.280 --> 0:29:48.880
<v Speaker 1>as the rest of these guys. I don't know that

0:29:48.920 --> 0:29:51.240
<v Speaker 1>he has the same opportunity, but he's gonna be in

0:29:51.240 --> 0:29:54.360
<v Speaker 1>that range. He should be owned in more than forty

0:29:54.400 --> 0:29:56.520
<v Speaker 1>eight percent of leagues, should be owned intent team leagues,

0:29:56.600 --> 0:29:58.440
<v Speaker 1>and should be own in twelve team leagues because he

0:29:58.480 --> 0:30:02.160
<v Speaker 1>does have immense upside. I don't think he's actually going

0:30:02.200 --> 0:30:04.560
<v Speaker 1>to supplant Keenan Allen because they play different roles on

0:30:04.560 --> 0:30:06.720
<v Speaker 1>their team totally. Obviously, Keenan Allen is still the go

0:30:06.800 --> 0:30:09.520
<v Speaker 1>to guy. He's dominating targets for this team, but he's

0:30:09.560 --> 0:30:12.440
<v Speaker 1>more of the possession guy. He's the guy that Philip

0:30:12.520 --> 0:30:14.880
<v Speaker 1>Rivers leans on more often. But what we're seeing Mike

0:30:14.920 --> 0:30:19.480
<v Speaker 1>Williams takeover is that he has he has thirteen less

0:30:19.520 --> 0:30:22.200
<v Speaker 1>targets on the season than Keenan Allen, yet he has

0:30:22.200 --> 0:30:24.680
<v Speaker 1>twenty more air yards this year, so he's being targeted

0:30:24.680 --> 0:30:27.080
<v Speaker 1>more so as he down the field. Threat We're seeing

0:30:27.080 --> 0:30:29.360
<v Speaker 1>guys like Travis Benjamin kind of fall by the wayside.

0:30:29.360 --> 0:30:31.840
<v Speaker 1>He's not really playing much anymore. His snaps are going

0:30:32.000 --> 0:30:35.120
<v Speaker 1>way down. For the Los Angeles Chargers. Tyro Williams is

0:30:35.160 --> 0:30:39.400
<v Speaker 1>still playing more than Mike Williams, which is annoying honestly,

0:30:39.720 --> 0:30:42.600
<v Speaker 1>but he is not being targeted as as much as

0:30:42.640 --> 0:30:45.640
<v Speaker 1>Mike Williams down the field. He's not being targeted more overall,

0:30:45.760 --> 0:30:48.760
<v Speaker 1>and Mike Williams um is being targeted in the red zone.

0:30:48.880 --> 0:30:51.280
<v Speaker 1>He has three red zone targets to Keenan Allen's four,

0:30:51.520 --> 0:30:55.280
<v Speaker 1>but obviously has the the three targets, I mean the

0:30:55.280 --> 0:30:57.600
<v Speaker 1>three touchdowns this year, and I believe Keenan Allen only

0:30:57.680 --> 0:31:01.280
<v Speaker 1>has one UM, but Mike Himes is playing more overall

0:31:01.280 --> 0:31:04.160
<v Speaker 1>over the past two weeks, Week one of the snaps

0:31:04.360 --> 0:31:09.120
<v Speaker 1>Weeks two nice sixty seven point three in weeks three,

0:31:09.160 --> 0:31:11.280
<v Speaker 1>I kind of I want to see Mike Williams start

0:31:11.320 --> 0:31:13.960
<v Speaker 1>to supplant Tyer Williams though, and get that up until

0:31:13.960 --> 0:31:16.960
<v Speaker 1>the percent of the snaps, which I think will happen

0:31:17.000 --> 0:31:18.480
<v Speaker 1>the more of the season goes on. I agree with

0:31:18.520 --> 0:31:20.200
<v Speaker 1>I agree with that the more he gets his legs

0:31:20.280 --> 0:31:23.120
<v Speaker 1>under a little bit, the more comfortable that Philip Rivers

0:31:23.480 --> 0:31:25.520
<v Speaker 1>feels throwing him like it was a man child. Though

0:31:25.520 --> 0:31:27.800
<v Speaker 1>you absolutely like both of his touchdowns that he scored

0:31:27.880 --> 0:31:30.400
<v Speaker 1>this week. I'm watching in my house. I'm like, this

0:31:30.440 --> 0:31:34.360
<v Speaker 1>guy is unstoppable because if if you're game planning to

0:31:34.400 --> 0:31:37.720
<v Speaker 1>stop the charters, who do you stop? You're gonna try

0:31:37.720 --> 0:31:39.920
<v Speaker 1>and stop Keenan Allen, who would be a PPR monster

0:31:40.000 --> 0:31:42.320
<v Speaker 1>and rack up easily, you know, ten to fifteen receptions

0:31:42.320 --> 0:31:44.200
<v Speaker 1>on you if you wanted to, if Philip Vers wants

0:31:44.240 --> 0:31:46.240
<v Speaker 1>to go that route, or they could throw the ball

0:31:46.400 --> 0:31:49.320
<v Speaker 1>double digit times to Melvin Gordon and Austin Ekeler. So

0:31:49.360 --> 0:31:50.880
<v Speaker 1>who do you try and stop? You try and stop

0:31:50.880 --> 0:31:53.480
<v Speaker 1>all these other weapons. Mike Williams is gonna have single covers,

0:31:53.560 --> 0:31:57.360
<v Speaker 1>and I saw that when that happens in the red zone, especially,

0:31:57.960 --> 0:31:59.520
<v Speaker 1>no one's gonna be able to stop him one on one.

0:31:59.520 --> 0:32:02.080
<v Speaker 1>He's a six four wide receiver who runs good routes,

0:32:02.200 --> 0:32:04.040
<v Speaker 1>has strong hands, and he can jump out of the gym.

0:32:04.200 --> 0:32:06.040
<v Speaker 1>This is the reason why he was drafted as the

0:32:06.360 --> 0:32:09.720
<v Speaker 1>what six or seventh overall player last year. I'll go

0:32:09.760 --> 0:32:11.640
<v Speaker 1>as far as to say he might have more value

0:32:11.640 --> 0:32:14.440
<v Speaker 1>than Corey Davis right now ready, who was being drafted

0:32:14.560 --> 0:32:16.800
<v Speaker 1>five rounds earlier. I agree with that. Mike Williams Corey

0:32:16.840 --> 0:32:19.280
<v Speaker 1>Davis taken essentially back to back in last year's draft.

0:32:19.640 --> 0:32:22.320
<v Speaker 1>People love Corey Davis Nan Child as well, but his

0:32:22.400 --> 0:32:24.920
<v Speaker 1>quarterback situation, his offense, it's not great. Now. There are

0:32:24.920 --> 0:32:27.000
<v Speaker 1>times this week, by the way, that Corey Davis looked

0:32:27.040 --> 0:32:29.480
<v Speaker 1>really good, like get the ball in his hands and

0:32:29.480 --> 0:32:32.640
<v Speaker 1>he can make some stuff happen. The offense is is

0:32:32.680 --> 0:32:35.520
<v Speaker 1>not the offensive The Chargers have, just not Corey Davis

0:32:35.560 --> 0:32:37.280
<v Speaker 1>in that spot. It may be very very different. It's

0:32:37.320 --> 0:32:40.840
<v Speaker 1>Blaine Gabbert or a Marcus Mariotta dealing with a nerve

0:32:40.920 --> 0:32:43.200
<v Speaker 1>issue which we really don't know much about. They're clearly

0:32:43.240 --> 0:32:44.880
<v Speaker 1>not going to throw the ball down the field. That

0:32:45.000 --> 0:32:47.720
<v Speaker 1>is where Corey Davis would excel. But if you look

0:32:47.720 --> 0:32:50.680
<v Speaker 1>at the Titans offense, no pass catcher is excelling on

0:32:50.720 --> 0:32:54.160
<v Speaker 1>the seam right now. It's not Richard Matthews, it's not

0:32:54.160 --> 0:32:57.160
<v Speaker 1>Taiwan Taylor, it's not John lu Smith. Like their offense

0:32:57.160 --> 0:32:59.960
<v Speaker 1>is just absolutely abysmal, and they're actually competing in game

0:33:00.040 --> 0:33:04.000
<v Speaker 1>just because their defense is playing great. Now other wide

0:33:04.000 --> 0:33:07.640
<v Speaker 1>receivers that are out there that I drive I talk

0:33:07.720 --> 0:33:10.280
<v Speaker 1>the last week about dropping story. Shepherd said that with you.

0:33:10.280 --> 0:33:13.160
<v Speaker 1>I said that to you. Every everywhere had a really

0:33:13.200 --> 0:33:15.040
<v Speaker 1>really good game, and I think it's a direct result

0:33:15.120 --> 0:33:18.800
<v Speaker 1>to Evan Ingram getting hurt. Now Ingram well, here more

0:33:18.800 --> 0:33:21.840
<v Speaker 1>about him, certainly on Thursday with Dry and Virginia as well.

0:33:22.080 --> 0:33:23.840
<v Speaker 1>They're week he's week to week. He's not day to day.

0:33:24.040 --> 0:33:25.920
<v Speaker 1>He's weeks to week. He's not gonna play this weekend,

0:33:26.080 --> 0:33:29.000
<v Speaker 1>may not play next weekend either. That means Shepherd's value

0:33:29.080 --> 0:33:30.960
<v Speaker 1>is going off. But if he was dropped, probably worth

0:33:31.000 --> 0:33:33.520
<v Speaker 1>picking back up, especially in the short term. I will

0:33:33.520 --> 0:33:35.360
<v Speaker 1>say that I don't think he has as much upside

0:33:35.360 --> 0:33:37.360
<v Speaker 1>as any of the other wide receivers we talked about.

0:33:37.880 --> 0:33:40.760
<v Speaker 1>He probably has more upside than a guy like Christian

0:33:40.840 --> 0:33:45.400
<v Speaker 1>Kirk just because of the Arizona Cardinals offense. But yeah,

0:33:45.480 --> 0:33:48.560
<v Speaker 1>it's a direct correlation to Evan Ingram going down and

0:33:48.680 --> 0:33:50.600
<v Speaker 1>Sterling Shepherd just stepping up. And this is what we've

0:33:50.640 --> 0:33:52.760
<v Speaker 1>said before the season. Greg, the reason why I didn't

0:33:52.760 --> 0:33:54.960
<v Speaker 1>like Evan Ingram is because there's too many mouths to feed,

0:33:55.080 --> 0:33:57.840
<v Speaker 1>and we've seen that already. On the year, he's been inconsistent.

0:33:57.920 --> 0:34:00.280
<v Speaker 1>He scored a garbage time touchdown against the Cowboy Ways,

0:34:00.320 --> 0:34:03.200
<v Speaker 1>But Odell Beckham and Sae Kwon Barkley are clearly going

0:34:03.240 --> 0:34:05.680
<v Speaker 1>to touch the ball most in this offense, There's no

0:34:05.760 --> 0:34:08.640
<v Speaker 1>question about that. And then on a week to week basis,

0:34:08.719 --> 0:34:10.560
<v Speaker 1>is either going to be Shepherd or Ingram. What if

0:34:10.640 --> 0:34:13.239
<v Speaker 1>Ingram's out. Shepherd is clearly the number three guy in

0:34:13.280 --> 0:34:15.279
<v Speaker 1>the offense, and he saw him score the touchdown this

0:34:15.320 --> 0:34:17.680
<v Speaker 1>past week, and that's because defenses are trying to stop

0:34:17.680 --> 0:34:21.040
<v Speaker 1>players like Odell Beckham and Sae Kwon Barkley. There's been

0:34:21.080 --> 0:34:23.520
<v Speaker 1>two players that have been targeted inside the ten yard

0:34:23.560 --> 0:34:26.200
<v Speaker 1>line for the Giants is here. One of those targets

0:34:26.239 --> 0:34:27.839
<v Speaker 1>has gone to set Kwon Barkley. The other has gone

0:34:27.840 --> 0:34:30.319
<v Speaker 1>to Sterling Shepherd. That's what resulted in touchdown this past week.

0:34:30.360 --> 0:34:32.920
<v Speaker 1>There you go, There you go, Sterling Shepherd the number

0:34:32.960 --> 0:34:37.400
<v Speaker 1>three option when Evan Ingram isn't around, and ultimately number

0:34:37.400 --> 0:34:39.120
<v Speaker 1>three is so bad in an offense that should be

0:34:39.200 --> 0:34:41.319
<v Speaker 1>able to move the ball. I agree, he's way below

0:34:41.400 --> 0:34:43.200
<v Speaker 1>all these other guys who talked about the Mike Williams

0:34:43.200 --> 0:34:45.120
<v Speaker 1>and Tyler boys. That Calvin Ridley is the world of

0:34:45.280 --> 0:34:48.800
<v Speaker 1>Sterling Shepherd. Certainly worth talking about some other wide receivers

0:34:48.840 --> 0:34:50.719
<v Speaker 1>before we hit the break, Let's go to Green Bay

0:34:50.719 --> 0:34:53.200
<v Speaker 1>and talk about Geronimo Allison. You talk about from number

0:34:53.239 --> 0:34:57.239
<v Speaker 1>three targets, Donald Allison's probably the number three, maybe number four,

0:34:57.440 --> 0:34:59.759
<v Speaker 1>depending on where you value Randall Cobb. But he's a

0:34:59.880 --> 0:35:03.120
<v Speaker 1>three just score touchdown really any week when Aaron Rodgers

0:35:03.120 --> 0:35:05.040
<v Speaker 1>is throwing the ball. That's why I like to draft him,

0:35:05.280 --> 0:35:07.319
<v Speaker 1>and that's why I think he's probably worth picking up.

0:35:07.320 --> 0:35:10.160
<v Speaker 1>I think he's a good bench guy, probably good bye guy. Yeah,

0:35:10.200 --> 0:35:12.880
<v Speaker 1>he absolutely is. And you know I was watching um

0:35:13.080 --> 0:35:17.080
<v Speaker 1>the lineup lock Live show on on Sunday morning, and Corey,

0:35:17.120 --> 0:35:20.960
<v Speaker 1>to his credit, said that Donalmo Allison is a week in,

0:35:21.080 --> 0:35:24.200
<v Speaker 1>week outstarter in PPR, and it doesn't it surprises you,

0:35:24.239 --> 0:35:26.799
<v Speaker 1>but he's had at least twelve PPR points in each

0:35:26.840 --> 0:35:29.120
<v Speaker 1>of his first three games. Um, you still want to

0:35:29.160 --> 0:35:31.040
<v Speaker 1>see those targets come up. He's third on the team

0:35:31.160 --> 0:35:33.520
<v Speaker 1>in terms of targets share ryandad cops getting targeted a

0:35:33.560 --> 0:35:36.200
<v Speaker 1>lot still and that's annoying for Geronimo Allison owners. But

0:35:36.280 --> 0:35:38.400
<v Speaker 1>Allison right now is the one that's actually putting up

0:35:38.400 --> 0:35:41.800
<v Speaker 1>the points. So I would still rank him behind Bridley

0:35:41.880 --> 0:35:46.440
<v Speaker 1>Boyd and Mike Williams, probably ahead of Sterling Shephard just

0:35:46.440 --> 0:35:48.520
<v Speaker 1>because he's the number three in a better offense in green.

0:35:48.560 --> 0:35:51.239
<v Speaker 1>But I agree with that. Jordy Nelson's owned six percent

0:35:51.239 --> 0:35:54.359
<v Speaker 1>of fantasy leagues. Frank he picking him up? No, Yeah,

0:35:55.040 --> 0:35:59.239
<v Speaker 1>out of the running backs go top. Next, there's only

0:35:59.239 --> 0:36:01.839
<v Speaker 1>one place to listen into the best fantasy advice, and

0:36:01.880 --> 0:36:04.839
<v Speaker 1>that's the Fantasy Sports Radio Network. By downloading the fan

0:36:04.840 --> 0:36:06.920
<v Speaker 1>t s Y Radio Network app, you'll be blessed with

0:36:07.000 --> 0:36:09.919
<v Speaker 1>having the top fantasy experts bright in your pocket. You'll

0:36:09.920 --> 0:36:12.880
<v Speaker 1>get award winning and entertaining programs like The Road to Experts,

0:36:13.000 --> 0:36:17.240
<v Speaker 1>Let's cocka Doodle do It, Fantasy Best Friends Forever, Carton

0:36:17.320 --> 0:36:21.600
<v Speaker 1>and Friends, Yeah Part, and so much more. I'm saying,

0:36:21.640 --> 0:36:23.640
<v Speaker 1>download the f and T s Y Sports Radio Network

0:36:23.640 --> 0:36:26.319
<v Speaker 1>app now and take the most trusted fantasy experts with

0:36:26.400 --> 0:36:31.160
<v Speaker 1>you wherever you go. Back with you here on the

0:36:31.200 --> 0:36:36.319
<v Speaker 1>Fantasy Best Friends Forever Fantasy Sports Radio Network, and you

0:36:36.360 --> 0:36:38.920
<v Speaker 1>can head on over right now Daily rotor dot com.

0:36:38.960 --> 0:36:42.120
<v Speaker 1>It is the industry's leading daily fantasy site that has

0:36:42.160 --> 0:36:45.840
<v Speaker 1>produced seven separate FANDUL and draft kings, million dollar tournament winners,

0:36:46.160 --> 0:36:50.759
<v Speaker 1>and millions more in smaller prizes for callous subscribers. Once there,

0:36:50.800 --> 0:36:53.719
<v Speaker 1>you're gonna click click on go Premium, use the same

0:36:53.800 --> 0:36:57.000
<v Speaker 1>daily fantasy line optimizer. That's how Daily Rotor customers achieve

0:36:57.080 --> 0:36:59.439
<v Speaker 1>such remarkable success. You're right, Corey. After you write these

0:36:59.719 --> 0:37:02.080
<v Speaker 1>and if it's sports wagering you're into, click on a

0:37:02.080 --> 0:37:04.279
<v Speaker 1>new sports betting tab. We'll be able to use the

0:37:04.320 --> 0:37:07.000
<v Speaker 1>same tools that'll produce all those daily fantasy winnings for

0:37:07.080 --> 0:37:09.799
<v Speaker 1>money line picks, picks against the spread, game totals, and

0:37:09.800 --> 0:37:12.759
<v Speaker 1>player props. Go to Daily Roader dot com entering the

0:37:12.760 --> 0:37:14.799
<v Speaker 1>promo code F fan T S Y and you'll get

0:37:14.800 --> 0:37:18.320
<v Speaker 1>a special discount. Daily Roader dot com, the industry's website

0:37:18.520 --> 0:37:25.319
<v Speaker 1>where millionaires are made. Literally, who's that? I guess as

0:37:25.360 --> 0:37:27.680
<v Speaker 1>good as mine. Alright, So someone dude just walked in here.

0:37:28.200 --> 0:37:31.240
<v Speaker 1>Corey the bouncer did not do his job. It seems

0:37:31.880 --> 0:37:34.479
<v Speaker 1>Um weaves a friend with Mike. He's kind of looking around.

0:37:34.640 --> 0:37:37.960
<v Speaker 1>So I'll figure it out after the program figured out.

0:37:38.360 --> 0:37:39.960
<v Speaker 1>Figure it out. No a deal. Are there any other

0:37:40.000 --> 0:37:41.799
<v Speaker 1>wide receivers you want to mention? Frank before we move on?

0:37:42.800 --> 0:37:48.799
<v Speaker 1>I listed Antonio Callaway just owned he was targeted. I

0:37:48.800 --> 0:37:50.680
<v Speaker 1>believe it was double digit times last week and that

0:37:50.840 --> 0:37:54.200
<v Speaker 1>Thursday night game. And this goes back to the whether

0:37:54.239 --> 0:37:56.080
<v Speaker 1>you believe he was a backup or a starter all

0:37:56.120 --> 0:37:58.120
<v Speaker 1>along in training camp, but he was likely working with

0:37:58.160 --> 0:38:01.480
<v Speaker 1>Baker Mayfield a lot so ring the preseason. And Jarvis

0:38:01.560 --> 0:38:03.759
<v Speaker 1>Landry has his role on the team, he has that

0:38:03.880 --> 0:38:07.000
<v Speaker 1>Antonio Brown role in the Todd Haley offense, so he's

0:38:07.000 --> 0:38:10.799
<v Speaker 1>going to easily be the most targeted player on this team.

0:38:11.360 --> 0:38:14.239
<v Speaker 1>But I think Antonio Callaway has a role Um, and

0:38:14.280 --> 0:38:17.520
<v Speaker 1>given how accurate Baker Mayfield was I mean, the most

0:38:17.560 --> 0:38:20.920
<v Speaker 1>accurate quarterback in college history in all three levels of

0:38:20.920 --> 0:38:23.800
<v Speaker 1>the past game down the field as well. Antonio Callaway

0:38:23.840 --> 0:38:27.040
<v Speaker 1>is gonna have some value here. He's behind everyone that

0:38:27.080 --> 0:38:34.520
<v Speaker 1>we've mentioned except for would you rather have Calaware Kirk? Yeah,

0:38:34.560 --> 0:38:37.400
<v Speaker 1>I think I agree with you, But it's close. It's close,

0:38:37.560 --> 0:38:40.319
<v Speaker 1>But yeah, he's Uh. If all those other guys are

0:38:40.320 --> 0:38:44.960
<v Speaker 1>owned from Ridley, Mike Williams, Jernimo Allison, and if Callaway

0:38:45.040 --> 0:38:47.839
<v Speaker 1>is available, because he's only I think he's a guy

0:38:47.880 --> 0:38:51.160
<v Speaker 1>worth mentioning. Yeah, I completely completely agree with all of that.

0:38:51.280 --> 0:38:52.719
<v Speaker 1>Let me get some players to drop. You asked me

0:38:52.719 --> 0:38:55.200
<v Speaker 1>a good one during the break. Mike Williams is out there.

0:38:55.680 --> 0:39:00.000
<v Speaker 1>You're dropping Mike. You're dropping Corey Davis or Mike Williams. Yeah.

0:39:00.040 --> 0:39:02.959
<v Speaker 1>Someone in YouTube chat just asked the same question about

0:39:03.040 --> 0:39:05.040
<v Speaker 1>both Mike Willams and Calvin Ridley, and I said I

0:39:05.040 --> 0:39:07.840
<v Speaker 1>would tyler him in there too. I would drop Corey

0:39:07.920 --> 0:39:13.279
<v Speaker 1>Davis to certainly get Calvin Ridley right now. I do

0:39:13.320 --> 0:39:15.960
<v Speaker 1>it from Mike Williams, I would. I mean, how long

0:39:15.960 --> 0:39:18.960
<v Speaker 1>can you wait into a fantasy season, especially you know,

0:39:19.000 --> 0:39:21.560
<v Speaker 1>if you're dying for a win. Look, if you drafted

0:39:21.560 --> 0:39:23.279
<v Speaker 1>Corey Davis in the fifth or sixth round where he

0:39:23.320 --> 0:39:25.600
<v Speaker 1>was going and you probably need help at the wide

0:39:25.600 --> 0:39:28.840
<v Speaker 1>receiver position right now. You can't afford to wait. Ideally,

0:39:28.880 --> 0:39:30.759
<v Speaker 1>I would want to hold onto him. I still think

0:39:30.800 --> 0:39:33.120
<v Speaker 1>that he has upside based on everything that we've seen

0:39:33.160 --> 0:39:35.759
<v Speaker 1>from this Titans offense. It's just not clicking right now.

0:39:35.760 --> 0:39:38.480
<v Speaker 1>Blaine Gabbert Marcus Mariota with the injury. Uh, they're not

0:39:38.520 --> 0:39:40.680
<v Speaker 1>throwing the ball down the field. They're not getting creative

0:39:40.680 --> 0:39:43.080
<v Speaker 1>with Corey Davis, something that we thought that they would

0:39:43.080 --> 0:39:46.879
<v Speaker 1>be doing, but it just hasn't worked out. So I'll

0:39:46.920 --> 0:39:49.040
<v Speaker 1>take the production of what you're getting out of all

0:39:49.120 --> 0:39:50.920
<v Speaker 1>three of those other guys right now than what you're

0:39:50.920 --> 0:39:54.000
<v Speaker 1>getting out of Corey Davis. Listen, the fact is meber

0:39:54.040 --> 0:39:56.120
<v Speaker 1>Got Mariota can barely group of football. I don't mean

0:39:56.160 --> 0:39:58.920
<v Speaker 1>that to say that like haphazardly, like he's having trouble

0:39:59.040 --> 0:40:00.880
<v Speaker 1>doing it. He's not gonna be able to throw it

0:40:00.920 --> 0:40:03.279
<v Speaker 1>down field because he's not gonna be able to have

0:40:03.480 --> 0:40:05.880
<v Speaker 1>the touch on it, and marks Mariot to really relies

0:40:05.920 --> 0:40:08.320
<v Speaker 1>on touch. I'm very, very worried about the value of

0:40:08.320 --> 0:40:13.279
<v Speaker 1>a guy like Corey Davis. Um Chris Hogan. He's talking

0:40:13.280 --> 0:40:15.440
<v Speaker 1>about him yesterday and I got some responses. He's like,

0:40:15.480 --> 0:40:18.240
<v Speaker 1>come on, you're not actually dropping Chris Hogan. Chris Hogan

0:40:18.320 --> 0:40:20.200
<v Speaker 1>versus all the guys, the top guys that we mentioned.

0:40:20.320 --> 0:40:23.040
<v Speaker 1>I'll leave Christian Kirk and Antonio Callaway out of there

0:40:23.040 --> 0:40:24.960
<v Speaker 1>because I don't think you're doing that, but Mike Williams,

0:40:25.040 --> 0:40:27.759
<v Speaker 1>Calvin Ridley, and Tyler Boyd the top three options. We'd

0:40:27.800 --> 0:40:31.680
<v Speaker 1>say all the waiver wire this week, potentially dropping Chris

0:40:31.719 --> 0:40:35.840
<v Speaker 1>Hogan for those guys. I could see doing it in

0:40:35.880 --> 0:40:37.480
<v Speaker 1>a ten team league, because that's those are the only

0:40:37.560 --> 0:40:40.120
<v Speaker 1>leagues where I could see these guys being available, But

0:40:40.200 --> 0:40:42.960
<v Speaker 1>even in a twelve teamer Again, it's similar to Corey Davis,

0:40:43.000 --> 0:40:44.680
<v Speaker 1>not to the same extent, because I still think that

0:40:44.719 --> 0:40:46.719
<v Speaker 1>Chris Hogan has more upside because he plays in the

0:40:46.719 --> 0:40:49.600
<v Speaker 1>Patriots offense, and we saw that last year, even with

0:40:49.640 --> 0:40:51.960
<v Speaker 1>Brandon Cooks around, even with Gronk around, even with James

0:40:51.960 --> 0:40:54.839
<v Speaker 1>White catching passes YEP. The first nine games that Chris

0:40:54.840 --> 0:40:58.680
<v Speaker 1>Hogan played last year, he was a top fifteen wide receiver.

0:40:59.080 --> 0:41:01.200
<v Speaker 1>So he doesn't need a huge target share in order

0:41:01.239 --> 0:41:03.600
<v Speaker 1>to be viable for Fantasy he's a guy that can,

0:41:03.680 --> 0:41:05.600
<v Speaker 1>you know, if everything's working out, give you six dyrds

0:41:05.600 --> 0:41:08.400
<v Speaker 1>and a touchdown every single week. Might not have crazy outside,

0:41:08.640 --> 0:41:12.200
<v Speaker 1>but he's still he has a safe floor, or at

0:41:12.239 --> 0:41:15.600
<v Speaker 1>least he did last year. But what he's doing so

0:41:15.680 --> 0:41:22.040
<v Speaker 1>far this season, Calvin Ridley, Mike Williams, and Tyler Boyd

0:41:22.200 --> 0:41:25.960
<v Speaker 1>all have established roles on their team and they're producing

0:41:26.040 --> 0:41:28.760
<v Speaker 1>right now, and Chris Hogan is not. So with guys

0:41:28.760 --> 0:41:31.200
<v Speaker 1>like Julian Edelman and Josh Gordon on the men on

0:41:31.280 --> 0:41:33.839
<v Speaker 1>the way back, I think the outlook for those other

0:41:33.880 --> 0:41:36.400
<v Speaker 1>three players just looks better right now, and especially if

0:41:36.440 --> 0:41:38.640
<v Speaker 1>you need the help again, if you start oh in

0:41:38.680 --> 0:41:40.799
<v Speaker 1>three or one and two, you're kind of like you're

0:41:40.800 --> 0:41:43.560
<v Speaker 1>back against the against the wall. You can't afford to

0:41:43.600 --> 0:41:45.760
<v Speaker 1>wait on guys like Chris Hogan and Corey Davis forever

0:41:46.080 --> 0:41:48.240
<v Speaker 1>you need to win, and especially if those wide receivers

0:41:48.239 --> 0:41:51.120
<v Speaker 1>are available. I would do it, But similar to Corey Davis,

0:41:51.120 --> 0:41:54.080
<v Speaker 1>I wouldn't want to drop Chris Hogan obviously, no, you

0:41:54.120 --> 0:41:56.239
<v Speaker 1>know how high it was on him. But if you

0:41:56.320 --> 0:41:57.840
<v Speaker 1>need to win, then you have to pick up players

0:41:57.840 --> 0:41:59.680
<v Speaker 1>who are producing. I'll say this, I'll do it. For

0:41:59.840 --> 0:42:02.799
<v Speaker 1>y your Boyd for sure, because I think Tyler Boyd

0:42:02.880 --> 0:42:05.160
<v Speaker 1>right now, especially depending on how hurt aj Green is

0:42:05.200 --> 0:42:07.920
<v Speaker 1>because the number one option in the offense numer number one.

0:42:09.680 --> 0:42:12.279
<v Speaker 1>I'll do it everywhere for that. I don't know that

0:42:12.320 --> 0:42:14.360
<v Speaker 1>I could do it for Calarudley and Mike Williams quite

0:42:14.440 --> 0:42:17.840
<v Speaker 1>yet in a twelve team league atempting league. Fine Tea,

0:42:18.040 --> 0:42:20.520
<v Speaker 1>I don't think I could pull that trigger. But how

0:42:20.520 --> 0:42:22.800
<v Speaker 1>good do you feel about starting Chris Hogan this week?

0:42:22.840 --> 0:42:26.239
<v Speaker 1>After another dud? Again? It's been off on like Week

0:42:26.280 --> 0:42:29.160
<v Speaker 1>one was terrible, and he scored two touchdowns against the Jaguars,

0:42:29.200 --> 0:42:31.200
<v Speaker 1>and that's what his upside can be. He he could

0:42:31.239 --> 0:42:33.760
<v Speaker 1>be matchup proof because he has Tom Brady as his quarterback.

0:42:33.920 --> 0:42:36.880
<v Speaker 1>Then last week against the Detroit Lions, he laid another egg.

0:42:37.200 --> 0:42:39.719
<v Speaker 1>This week he's going up against the Miami Dolphins secondary,

0:42:39.880 --> 0:42:42.960
<v Speaker 1>which has been phenomenal this year. Greg Xavier Howard, a

0:42:42.960 --> 0:42:46.080
<v Speaker 1>guy that I've consistently brought up, is now shadowing opposing

0:42:46.080 --> 0:42:48.439
<v Speaker 1>wide receivers. He did so last week against the Marii

0:42:48.480 --> 0:42:51.359
<v Speaker 1>Cooper and he shut him down and they and they

0:42:51.400 --> 0:42:55.120
<v Speaker 1>have Minka Fitzpatrick now too, who is extremely versatile. He

0:42:55.120 --> 0:42:57.480
<v Speaker 1>could play in the slot as a nickel corner. He

0:42:57.480 --> 0:43:00.000
<v Speaker 1>could play as a safety. He did that last week feeling,

0:43:00.000 --> 0:43:02.000
<v Speaker 1>and as a starting safety, you can use as a safety,

0:43:02.000 --> 0:43:04.840
<v Speaker 1>as a corner or a cornerback. This Dolphins defense is legit.

0:43:05.120 --> 0:43:07.080
<v Speaker 1>They have a good defensive line, they have good pass

0:43:07.200 --> 0:43:09.840
<v Speaker 1>rushers and Robert Quinn and Cameron Wake and they have

0:43:09.880 --> 0:43:11.880
<v Speaker 1>an underrated secondary. Right now, how great you are you

0:43:11.880 --> 0:43:14.279
<v Speaker 1>gonna feel about starting Chris Hogan this week? Not great,

0:43:15.400 --> 0:43:17.240
<v Speaker 1>I'm telling you right now, I'm gonna have Mike Williams

0:43:17.280 --> 0:43:19.800
<v Speaker 1>ranked higher going up against the San Francisco forty Niners defense,

0:43:19.880 --> 0:43:22.319
<v Speaker 1>which is gonna be without Richard Sherman. Call really ranked

0:43:22.360 --> 0:43:25.120
<v Speaker 1>higher as well. I will because in a game against

0:43:25.320 --> 0:43:27.080
<v Speaker 1>and I'm gonna have Tyler Boyd ranked hire as well,

0:43:27.120 --> 0:43:30.000
<v Speaker 1>even if A J. Green plays. The Bengals and the

0:43:30.000 --> 0:43:32.200
<v Speaker 1>Falcons right now are at fifty one and a half

0:43:32.239 --> 0:43:34.680
<v Speaker 1>at their over under. Let's the second highest over under

0:43:34.719 --> 0:43:37.600
<v Speaker 1>behind only the Chiefs. We're facing the Broncos just because

0:43:37.840 --> 0:43:39.560
<v Speaker 1>the Chiefs have to have the highest over under every

0:43:39.560 --> 0:43:42.080
<v Speaker 1>single week. Of course, they're scoring nearly forty points game

0:43:42.120 --> 0:43:45.040
<v Speaker 1>every single game, But that Falcons and Bengals game is

0:43:45.080 --> 0:43:49.200
<v Speaker 1>gonna be an absolute shootout from both sides. I think

0:43:49.200 --> 0:43:52.280
<v Speaker 1>there's gonna be points scored on both sides on um

0:43:52.320 --> 0:43:54.840
<v Speaker 1>to some running backs before we have a video feed

0:43:54.880 --> 0:43:58.040
<v Speaker 1>here another really here, we talked about Buck Allen every week.

0:43:58.440 --> 0:43:59.840
<v Speaker 1>I don't kind of want I don't really want to

0:43:59.840 --> 0:44:02.520
<v Speaker 1>get into it again, buck Allen. You mentioned Chris Ivory here.

0:44:02.560 --> 0:44:05.880
<v Speaker 1>Depending on the genis availability for this weekend. You know,

0:44:06.239 --> 0:44:09.960
<v Speaker 1>running back is an absolute crash right now. There's nothing,

0:44:10.040 --> 0:44:12.719
<v Speaker 1>there's nothing to add from the Eagles. Guys like you

0:44:12.760 --> 0:44:14.600
<v Speaker 1>don't want to get involved in Wendel Smallwood. Even if

0:44:14.680 --> 0:44:16.759
<v Speaker 1>Coleman is somehow available, I don't think he would be.

0:44:16.960 --> 0:44:20.080
<v Speaker 1>But j j I is expecting to be back this week,

0:44:20.120 --> 0:44:23.000
<v Speaker 1>as is Darren Sprowls. I think Peterson actually said yesterday

0:44:23.680 --> 0:44:27.640
<v Speaker 1>just a complete Eagles jumbled up running back situation, which

0:44:27.680 --> 0:44:29.799
<v Speaker 1>is really why I was not high on a Ji

0:44:30.280 --> 0:44:33.640
<v Speaker 1>coming into the season. And then Buck Allen once again.

0:44:33.760 --> 0:44:36.240
<v Speaker 1>You know I spoke about him yesterday. He's scoring touchdowns,

0:44:36.239 --> 0:44:38.279
<v Speaker 1>he's getting to go line work, but he's getting like

0:44:38.360 --> 0:44:41.399
<v Speaker 1>twenty yards a game. He's gonna have a game where

0:44:41.400 --> 0:44:43.520
<v Speaker 1>he doesn't score a touchdown. The guy isn't gonna score

0:44:43.719 --> 0:44:47.080
<v Speaker 1>sixteen or twenty touchdowns this year. So in the game

0:44:47.120 --> 0:44:48.839
<v Speaker 1>where he doesn't score a touchdown, he's gonna give you

0:44:48.880 --> 0:44:52.480
<v Speaker 1>twenty to thirty yards maybe you know, three or four receptions,

0:44:53.040 --> 0:44:55.360
<v Speaker 1>and he's not gonna do anything else. So he actually

0:44:55.360 --> 0:44:58.239
<v Speaker 1>played more snaps than Alex Collins this past week in

0:44:58.239 --> 0:44:59.920
<v Speaker 1>a game that's set up well for Alex Collins. So

0:45:00.560 --> 0:45:02.120
<v Speaker 1>I don't really know what else to say about that.

0:45:02.360 --> 0:45:04.239
<v Speaker 1>What look, Allen should be own if you're an Alex

0:45:04.280 --> 0:45:07.120
<v Speaker 1>Collins owner, no question, no question about it. Now as

0:45:07.120 --> 0:45:10.200
<v Speaker 1>we get into tight end and defenses, yere for a moment,

0:45:11.640 --> 0:45:17.480
<v Speaker 1>Tyler Efforts probably the number one tight end I don't

0:45:17.480 --> 0:45:19.880
<v Speaker 1>want to own right now out of these dudes on

0:45:19.920 --> 0:45:24.200
<v Speaker 1>the list. Um, he got involved. Obviously CUM is still involved.

0:45:24.440 --> 0:45:27.160
<v Speaker 1>But I think Tyler Eifert woke up a little bit

0:45:27.200 --> 0:45:30.440
<v Speaker 1>this week, which is nice. Yes, he certainly did. He

0:45:30.560 --> 0:45:33.080
<v Speaker 1>easily had his best game of the season. Um, he

0:45:33.160 --> 0:45:36.239
<v Speaker 1>was the second most targeted player on the team for

0:45:36.280 --> 0:45:39.080
<v Speaker 1>the Bengals this week. So that's what we wanted to see. Um, Well,

0:45:39.080 --> 0:45:41.040
<v Speaker 1>not if you're Tyler Boyd owner, but overall, if you

0:45:41.080 --> 0:45:43.480
<v Speaker 1>like Tyler Eifert and his upside for the season. You

0:45:43.520 --> 0:45:45.360
<v Speaker 1>wanted to see him bounce back and get some targets

0:45:45.360 --> 0:45:47.680
<v Speaker 1>in this game, and that's exactly what he did. And again,

0:45:47.760 --> 0:45:50.520
<v Speaker 1>we're gonna just keep We're gonna keep pounding this Falcons

0:45:50.680 --> 0:45:53.560
<v Speaker 1>and Bengals game all week long. But we just saw

0:45:54.280 --> 0:45:57.400
<v Speaker 1>Ben Watson have like seventy yards receiving on five receptions

0:45:57.480 --> 0:46:01.080
<v Speaker 1>against the Falcons defense. So um, and they lost their

0:46:01.239 --> 0:46:04.759
<v Speaker 1>top safety, they lost both safeties, actually, they lost their

0:46:04.760 --> 0:46:07.800
<v Speaker 1>top cover linebacker. They lost Dion Jones, Kiano O'Neil, and

0:46:07.880 --> 0:46:10.319
<v Speaker 1>Ricardo Allen. Those are the guys who are normally gonna

0:46:10.360 --> 0:46:14.520
<v Speaker 1>be faced with with guarding tight ends. And now Tyler

0:46:14.520 --> 0:46:16.080
<v Speaker 1>Eiffert seems like he's going to be in for a

0:46:16.080 --> 0:46:18.280
<v Speaker 1>good matchup this week against the Falcons. So I agree

0:46:18.280 --> 0:46:19.879
<v Speaker 1>with you, but I think that there are some other

0:46:19.920 --> 0:46:22.480
<v Speaker 1>interesting names out there, just to name a few. Ben

0:46:22.520 --> 0:46:26.120
<v Speaker 1>Watson thirty on going up against the Giants UH this week,

0:46:26.160 --> 0:46:28.760
<v Speaker 1>and we know what their woes were last year against

0:46:28.800 --> 0:46:31.000
<v Speaker 1>guardian tight ends. They've been better this year for sure,

0:46:31.160 --> 0:46:33.239
<v Speaker 1>but they haven't really faced a team that utilizes the

0:46:33.280 --> 0:46:35.400
<v Speaker 1>tight end all that much. So I think Ben Watson

0:46:35.440 --> 0:46:39.279
<v Speaker 1>is sneaky if you've lost Evan ingram Um and Vance

0:46:39.360 --> 0:46:41.319
<v Speaker 1>McDonald as well is another one. I think this is

0:46:41.320 --> 0:46:43.680
<v Speaker 1>a frustrating situation because weekend and week out, how do

0:46:43.719 --> 0:46:46.040
<v Speaker 1>we know if it's Jesse James, if it's Vance McDonald.

0:46:46.400 --> 0:46:48.920
<v Speaker 1>I think the team wants Jesse James to be the

0:46:48.920 --> 0:46:51.439
<v Speaker 1>blocking tight end and Vance McDonald to be that pass

0:46:51.520 --> 0:46:55.360
<v Speaker 1>catching tight end um who can be versatile as a

0:46:55.400 --> 0:46:58.040
<v Speaker 1>receiver lining up at the line of scrimmage as well.

0:46:58.360 --> 0:47:00.480
<v Speaker 1>That's obviously why they traded for him, So I think

0:47:00.520 --> 0:47:03.800
<v Speaker 1>he has upside um. And then there's also Dallas Goddard.

0:47:03.800 --> 0:47:05.239
<v Speaker 1>Shout out to Jim Day, who has been a huge

0:47:05.320 --> 0:47:09.640
<v Speaker 1>Dallas Goddard film all year long. Just played had it

0:47:09.719 --> 0:47:12.680
<v Speaker 1>up here fifty five snaps in Week three, which was

0:47:12.760 --> 0:47:15.800
<v Speaker 1>by far a season high. He played seventeen in each

0:47:16.000 --> 0:47:18.399
<v Speaker 1>of weeks one and two, played fifty five this week.

0:47:18.400 --> 0:47:20.439
<v Speaker 1>That was sixty seven percent of the snaps he called.

0:47:20.640 --> 0:47:23.160
<v Speaker 1>He was targeted seven times, called all seven scored a

0:47:23.200 --> 0:47:25.960
<v Speaker 1>touchdown as well. So if Alston Jeffrey is not back

0:47:26.000 --> 0:47:28.080
<v Speaker 1>this week for the Eagles, I think Dallas Goddard is

0:47:28.080 --> 0:47:30.520
<v Speaker 1>going to be a moorderline uh tight end one again

0:47:30.520 --> 0:47:31.880
<v Speaker 1>this week. Yeah, I think it could be definitely a

0:47:31.880 --> 0:47:34.600
<v Speaker 1>sneaky play with Dallas Goddard essentially as the wide receiver

0:47:34.800 --> 0:47:37.560
<v Speaker 1>three there in Philadelphia, behind zach Ertz and behind Nelson.

0:47:37.600 --> 0:47:39.959
<v Speaker 1>Idealor so, I think that could be, as I said,

0:47:40.120 --> 0:47:43.879
<v Speaker 1>a sneaky play there, Um players to drop. We're here's

0:47:43.880 --> 0:47:45.880
<v Speaker 1>the defenses. When we wrap up, I want to do

0:47:45.880 --> 0:47:48.440
<v Speaker 1>this before we have to sign off. YouTube players to drop.

0:47:49.520 --> 0:47:52.040
<v Speaker 1>You've listed a whole bunch here. None of the drain

0:47:52.040 --> 0:47:56.000
<v Speaker 1>interesting to me. No, they're not. Because Robby and d J. Moore,

0:47:56.120 --> 0:47:58.200
<v Speaker 1>John Ross, Anthony Miller. You're dropping all of them, not

0:47:58.239 --> 0:48:00.400
<v Speaker 1>thinking about it, like you're dropping for anybody that's that

0:48:00.560 --> 0:48:02.919
<v Speaker 1>These aren't but their own. They're still own in twelve

0:48:02.920 --> 0:48:04.480
<v Speaker 1>teen weeks. So that's why I wanted to mention them.

0:48:04.600 --> 0:48:07.799
<v Speaker 1>Drop them all. Robby Anderson, Duke Johnson, Peregarson, d J. Moore,

0:48:07.920 --> 0:48:10.879
<v Speaker 1>John Ross, Anthony Miller, you're dropping every single one of them. Fine,

0:48:11.000 --> 0:48:13.240
<v Speaker 1>let me get to the harder ones, right. Imagine yesterday

0:48:13.280 --> 0:48:15.759
<v Speaker 1>we medged today earlier. Chris Hogan and Corey Davis. I

0:48:15.800 --> 0:48:18.560
<v Speaker 1>think those are really interesting. Rex Burkhead, I think he's dropbable.

0:48:18.960 --> 0:48:22.040
<v Speaker 1>I agree with you, Brandon, Marshall, I think he's dropable.

0:48:22.080 --> 0:48:25.080
<v Speaker 1>I agree with you. That was kind of all had

0:48:25.120 --> 0:48:29.600
<v Speaker 1>to like lined up. Well, we're in ingredients. Look Rex Burkehead,

0:48:30.520 --> 0:48:33.120
<v Speaker 1>what we said about him yesterday, right, Sony Michelle saw

0:48:33.200 --> 0:48:35.600
<v Speaker 1>Moore snaps this week. Um, he was being used really

0:48:35.600 --> 0:48:38.000
<v Speaker 1>as the early down guy. He had fifteen carries in

0:48:38.040 --> 0:48:43.000
<v Speaker 1>that game, rushed for about fifty yards. Um. Rex Burkhead

0:48:43.080 --> 0:48:45.360
<v Speaker 1>is banged up right now and just doesn't really seem

0:48:45.400 --> 0:48:47.880
<v Speaker 1>to fit what the Patriots are doing. If they are

0:48:47.920 --> 0:48:49.520
<v Speaker 1>playing with the lead and they want to run the ball,

0:48:49.560 --> 0:48:51.200
<v Speaker 1>I think it's gonna be a lot of Sony Michelle

0:48:51.480 --> 0:48:54.040
<v Speaker 1>and otherwise it's just James White doing everything else. We

0:48:54.080 --> 0:48:56.719
<v Speaker 1>even saw James White get some carries in that game late, um,

0:48:56.800 --> 0:48:58.800
<v Speaker 1>and he's obviously the past catcher out of the backfield.

0:48:58.960 --> 0:49:01.440
<v Speaker 1>We thought Rex Burkehead wou be that Dion Louis Mold,

0:49:01.760 --> 0:49:03.400
<v Speaker 1>that he can do a little bit of everything. But

0:49:03.520 --> 0:49:06.240
<v Speaker 1>I think this injury is hurting him more than people

0:49:06.239 --> 0:49:08.920
<v Speaker 1>are more than they are leading on um, which is

0:49:08.960 --> 0:49:11.440
<v Speaker 1>why he left that game. I just don't think he

0:49:11.480 --> 0:49:18.920
<v Speaker 1>has much value in Is DeVante Parker droppable or any

0:49:19.000 --> 0:49:23.719
<v Speaker 1>of the wide receivers we mentioned today, Yes, absolutely, even

0:49:24.840 --> 0:49:27.960
<v Speaker 1>even Callaway and Christian Kirk. I would say just because

0:49:28.280 --> 0:49:31.200
<v Speaker 1>the Dolphins target share right now, people don't realize Jachem

0:49:31.239 --> 0:49:34.279
<v Speaker 1>Grant leads this team and target so it's just it's

0:49:34.280 --> 0:49:37.680
<v Speaker 1>another frustrating situation. It's really a wide receiver by committee

0:49:37.719 --> 0:49:39.520
<v Speaker 1>is which is what I've seen. Fantasy Twitter kind of

0:49:39.560 --> 0:49:42.760
<v Speaker 1>referred to it as Kenny Stills. That's why it's so frustrating.

0:49:42.800 --> 0:49:44.120
<v Speaker 1>With Kenny Stills, You're not going to know when to

0:49:44.120 --> 0:49:46.080
<v Speaker 1>start him because he's only getting five targets a week,

0:49:46.160 --> 0:49:49.279
<v Speaker 1>but he's catching these long touchdowns. So, um, whether it's

0:49:49.560 --> 0:49:52.880
<v Speaker 1>Jachim Grant, Albert Wilson, Kenny Stills, DeVante Parker on a

0:49:52.880 --> 0:49:55.440
<v Speaker 1>weekend week out, you're not gonna know that's gonna do

0:49:55.520 --> 0:49:57.719
<v Speaker 1>it for us. On the video stream, we're gonna sign

0:49:57.760 --> 0:50:00.720
<v Speaker 1>off YouTube now. We will of course be back tomorrow.

0:50:00.840 --> 0:50:03.719
<v Speaker 1>Come up next Fantasy for Ball Frenzy, Corey Parson, Jim

0:50:03.840 --> 0:50:07.040
<v Speaker 1>Day and Chris Ventra for the next five minutes. Will

0:50:07.080 --> 0:50:09.880
<v Speaker 1>go of course on the radio and finish out our podcast,

0:50:10.160 --> 0:50:14.200
<v Speaker 1>which you can hear on iTunes, SoundCloud, Spotify, wherever you

0:50:14.239 --> 0:50:16.080
<v Speaker 1>listen to your podcast. You can find us, give us

0:50:16.120 --> 0:50:19.640
<v Speaker 1>five stars, leave a comment, and most importantly subscribe. We

0:50:19.680 --> 0:50:27.880
<v Speaker 1>really appreciate it. Frankie, can you drop Yeah, I don't know,

0:50:31.200 --> 0:50:37.120
<v Speaker 1>You've got nothing went over the street. So what I

0:50:37.160 --> 0:50:40.000
<v Speaker 1>wrote down this week is the Seahawks at the Arizona Cardinals,

0:50:40.160 --> 0:50:43.000
<v Speaker 1>obviously going up against the rookie quarterback. The Seahawks are

0:50:43.040 --> 0:50:44.799
<v Speaker 1>starting to get healthy now and had a big week

0:50:44.880 --> 0:50:47.680
<v Speaker 1>last week against Dak Prescott and the Cowboys. The Cleveland

0:50:47.719 --> 0:50:50.640
<v Speaker 1>Browns are still only owning six percent of leagues and

0:50:51.000 --> 0:50:53.279
<v Speaker 1>the Oakland Raiders are in the bottom five in terms

0:50:53.360 --> 0:50:57.720
<v Speaker 1>of offense points scored on the season, so their offense

0:50:57.800 --> 0:50:59.680
<v Speaker 1>is not moving well right now, even if their home

0:51:00.040 --> 0:51:02.920
<v Speaker 1>in the black hole. I think the Browns defense has

0:51:02.960 --> 0:51:04.800
<v Speaker 1>proved to us that they are legit at this point.

0:51:05.040 --> 0:51:07.440
<v Speaker 1>And this is just a really deep just based on

0:51:07.480 --> 0:51:09.400
<v Speaker 1>the matchup. The Cowboys are not scoring a lot of

0:51:09.400 --> 0:51:11.600
<v Speaker 1>points right now. Dak Prescott is turning the ball over.

0:51:12.000 --> 0:51:14.799
<v Speaker 1>I wrote the Detroit Lions in because they looked much

0:51:14.800 --> 0:51:17.680
<v Speaker 1>improved last week against New England Patriots. From Tom Brady,

0:51:17.800 --> 0:51:20.240
<v Speaker 1>there you go, and I think it's very very interesting.

0:51:20.280 --> 0:51:22.520
<v Speaker 1>I like the Packers um against the Bills I think

0:51:22.560 --> 0:51:24.880
<v Speaker 1>they're gonna be They're gonna be out there. The Lions

0:51:24.880 --> 0:51:28.000
<v Speaker 1>obviously looked improved against the Patriots, Um, like you said.

0:51:28.320 --> 0:51:30.360
<v Speaker 1>And the Browns are good defense. That's just what it

0:51:30.480 --> 0:51:34.760
<v Speaker 1>is they are. I mean, Myles Garrett is a freak

0:51:34.760 --> 0:51:37.640
<v Speaker 1>of nature. To have Ogan Joby on the defensive line

0:51:37.800 --> 0:51:40.439
<v Speaker 1>was absolutely getting it done right now. To Denzel Ward

0:51:40.520 --> 0:51:43.319
<v Speaker 1>is playing the part of a top five pick in

0:51:43.360 --> 0:51:45.160
<v Speaker 1>the NFL draft. He was the fourth overall pick and

0:51:45.320 --> 0:51:48.000
<v Speaker 1>and really does look the part to this point in

0:51:48.000 --> 0:51:50.520
<v Speaker 1>the season. So they have some pieces on defense there.

0:51:50.760 --> 0:51:53.399
<v Speaker 1>Like I feel like we should just mention quarterbacks quick

0:51:54.120 --> 0:51:58.000
<v Speaker 1>just because Jimmy Garoppolo went down. Um, and if these

0:51:58.000 --> 0:52:00.800
<v Speaker 1>guys are available, I think Andy dall Alton leads the

0:52:00.880 --> 0:52:05.880
<v Speaker 1>charge totally. It's been is it for the week or

0:52:06.000 --> 0:52:08.359
<v Speaker 1>for the season. Do you think Baker Mayfield has more

0:52:08.480 --> 0:52:12.640
<v Speaker 1>season long value than Andy Dalton? I don't know. It's

0:52:12.640 --> 0:52:15.080
<v Speaker 1>fun like Andy Dalton, It's definitely more fun. I'm not

0:52:15.080 --> 0:52:16.839
<v Speaker 1>going to dispute that at all. Like you don't want

0:52:16.840 --> 0:52:19.000
<v Speaker 1>to own Andy Dalton. You don't see much upside there,

0:52:19.239 --> 0:52:21.600
<v Speaker 1>but he's the QB twelve on the season so far.

0:52:21.719 --> 0:52:24.719
<v Speaker 1>And I referenced the numbers since Bill Laser has taken

0:52:24.719 --> 0:52:27.280
<v Speaker 1>over as the offensive coordinator last year, it's now seventeen games.

0:52:27.719 --> 0:52:30.640
<v Speaker 1>It's something like last week it was thirty one touchdowns

0:52:30.680 --> 0:52:32.640
<v Speaker 1>and nine interceptions, so I think he had two and two.

0:52:32.640 --> 0:52:35.520
<v Speaker 1>So it's like thirty three touchdowns and eleven interceptions over

0:52:35.600 --> 0:52:38.960
<v Speaker 1>his last seventeen games. That's pretty efficient and he's getting

0:52:38.960 --> 0:52:41.800
<v Speaker 1>it done in this Bill Laser offense. So multiple touchdown

0:52:41.840 --> 0:52:44.320
<v Speaker 1>passes in four straight games dating back to last season

0:52:44.320 --> 0:52:47.239
<v Speaker 1>for Andy Dalton are gonna keep just hammering this game

0:52:47.280 --> 0:52:48.840
<v Speaker 1>against the Falcons. I think there's gonna be a lot

0:52:48.840 --> 0:52:51.600
<v Speaker 1>of points scored um and that Falcons defense has allowed

0:52:51.640 --> 0:52:54.879
<v Speaker 1>three hundred and thirty five passing yards and three touchdowns

0:52:54.920 --> 0:52:57.120
<v Speaker 1>in back to back games. So I like Andy Dalton

0:52:57.160 --> 0:52:59.839
<v Speaker 1>for this week more than more than Ryan tannehim more

0:52:59.880 --> 0:53:01.760
<v Speaker 1>than Baker Mayfield, and I think I like him most

0:53:01.960 --> 0:53:03.920
<v Speaker 1>for the season long as well. Well. It's not the

0:53:03.920 --> 0:53:06.320
<v Speaker 1>sexiest option. I'll agree with you now, it's not, but

0:53:06.360 --> 0:53:08.279
<v Speaker 1>I understand. I understand where you're coming from. If you

0:53:08.280 --> 0:53:10.480
<v Speaker 1>need Jimmy g and Andy Dalton certainly got on the

0:53:10.480 --> 0:53:13.000
<v Speaker 1>waiver y or maybe he started bleak Bortles last week

0:53:13.239 --> 0:53:15.840
<v Speaker 1>we thought was a great matchup. You were streaming quarterbacks

0:53:15.960 --> 0:53:20.400
<v Speaker 1>that didn't work out for you. Mayfield, Dalton my favorite too. Um,

0:53:20.480 --> 0:53:23.080
<v Speaker 1>Josh Allen, Josh Rosen. Quarterback leagues, you're out there. You

0:53:23.160 --> 0:53:25.600
<v Speaker 1>picked up Josh Allen, like you said last week, So

0:53:26.200 --> 0:53:28.400
<v Speaker 1>they're starting quarterbacks two quarterback league. You have to be

0:53:28.440 --> 0:53:31.680
<v Speaker 1>old Baker. Mayfield might not have been owned because you

0:53:31.719 --> 0:53:33.880
<v Speaker 1>know he wasn't starting so right. People might have not

0:53:33.960 --> 0:53:36.759
<v Speaker 1>rostered him so obviously in two quarterback leagues or in

0:53:36.800 --> 0:53:38.799
<v Speaker 1>super Flex, you're gonna be blowing some fab this week

0:53:38.840 --> 0:53:42.120
<v Speaker 1>on Baker on Josh Rosen or on Josh Allen, Josh Allon.

0:53:42.160 --> 0:53:45.080
<v Speaker 1>Don't forget sneaky legs man. He can he can run

0:53:45.200 --> 0:53:47.000
<v Speaker 1>and he showed that last week when he heard a

0:53:47.040 --> 0:53:49.560
<v Speaker 1>defender in the middle of the field. Um, he was

0:53:49.600 --> 0:53:51.799
<v Speaker 1>impressive both throwing and Russia. That's gonna do it for us.

0:53:51.800 --> 0:53:54.759
<v Speaker 1>Fantasy Football Frenzy is up next the Corey Parson, Jim

0:53:54.840 --> 0:53:57.080
<v Speaker 1>Day and Chris Bensher. My name is Greg Sousman. Thank

0:53:57.080 --> 0:53:59.200
<v Speaker 1>you so much for watching and listening. The Fantasy best

0:53:59.200 --> 0:54:01.520
<v Speaker 1>Friends Forever A he stampled two. We'll do it all

0:54:01.520 --> 0:54:06.960
<v Speaker 1>again tomorrow, we hope, m hmm.