WEBVTT - Apple's Virtual Reality Distortion Field, with Mark Gurman

0:00:17.400 --> 0:00:20.400
<v Speaker 1>Hey, and welcome to What Future. I'm your host Joshua Topolski,

0:00:20.560 --> 0:00:23.759
<v Speaker 1>and today on the podcast, boy have we got one

0:00:23.800 --> 0:00:29.240
<v Speaker 1>for you? Boy oh boy. I'm very excited because I

0:00:29.240 --> 0:00:34.920
<v Speaker 1>have been thinking a lot about reality and how terrible

0:00:34.960 --> 0:00:38.519
<v Speaker 1>it is and how I'd like to escape it. I

0:00:38.520 --> 0:00:40.760
<v Speaker 1>feel like I'm not giving reality a good affair shake.

0:00:40.840 --> 0:00:43.400
<v Speaker 1>The truth is reality is actually pretty excellent, unless you

0:00:43.440 --> 0:00:46.120
<v Speaker 1>read the news. I don't recommend that. But there's been

0:00:46.120 --> 0:00:48.640
<v Speaker 1>a lot of talk recently about a new Apple product

0:00:48.680 --> 0:00:51.320
<v Speaker 1>that is coming out which is supposedly going to be

0:00:51.520 --> 0:00:55.160
<v Speaker 1>a headset, a thing you wear on your face that

0:00:55.240 --> 0:01:00.640
<v Speaker 1>does virtual reality and augmented reality, and suppose will have

0:01:00.760 --> 0:01:03.520
<v Speaker 1>a screen that shows your eyeballs on it when you're

0:01:03.600 --> 0:01:06.559
<v Speaker 1>using it, which sounds very normal and not dystopian at all,

0:01:06.840 --> 0:01:09.880
<v Speaker 1>and I'm sure lots of people will really enjoy that. Anyhow,

0:01:09.920 --> 0:01:11.800
<v Speaker 1>there has been a ton of great writing done by

0:01:12.080 --> 0:01:15.399
<v Speaker 1>Mark German at Bloomberg. I am a huge fan of his,

0:01:15.480 --> 0:01:17.679
<v Speaker 1>and we've got him on the show today to get

0:01:17.720 --> 0:01:20.039
<v Speaker 1>into the guts of the Apple headset and all of

0:01:20.120 --> 0:01:22.800
<v Speaker 1>what the company's working on around that. So let's get

0:01:22.840 --> 0:01:43.000
<v Speaker 1>into this conversation because I have got a lot to say.

0:01:43.080 --> 0:01:47.000
<v Speaker 1>You are like probably at the top of the pyramid

0:01:47.120 --> 0:01:51.480
<v Speaker 1>of Apple scoopers, Like you have more inside info on

0:01:51.520 --> 0:01:54.640
<v Speaker 1>this company than I think anybody has ever had in

0:01:54.680 --> 0:01:57.120
<v Speaker 1>my experience, and I've been reading, as you well know,

0:01:57.200 --> 0:01:58.880
<v Speaker 1>I've been reading and writing about this shit for a

0:01:58.920 --> 0:02:02.640
<v Speaker 1>long time. You are consistently one hundred percent correct with them,

0:02:02.640 --> 0:02:04.960
<v Speaker 1>which is or like ninety percent correct with them, which

0:02:04.960 --> 0:02:07.200
<v Speaker 1>is very rare. So first, I want to say kudos

0:02:07.200 --> 0:02:10.960
<v Speaker 1>to you for being some kind of Apple Ninja's very

0:02:10.960 --> 0:02:14.440
<v Speaker 1>strange situation. But I applaud you, Thank you. But the

0:02:14.680 --> 0:02:16.120
<v Speaker 1>reason I want to talk to you is because we

0:02:16.160 --> 0:02:20.040
<v Speaker 1>are on the precipice supposedly, as so you claim on

0:02:20.120 --> 0:02:25.919
<v Speaker 1>the precipice of Apple releasing a mixed reality headset? Does

0:02:26.040 --> 0:02:28.480
<v Speaker 1>VR and AR? Correct? Stop me if any of this

0:02:28.480 --> 0:02:31.680
<v Speaker 1>sounds incorrect. Okay, they've been working on this headset. It's

0:02:31.680 --> 0:02:33.600
<v Speaker 1>a thing you wear on your face, you wear over

0:02:33.680 --> 0:02:37.320
<v Speaker 1>your eyes. It does VR, it does AR. It is

0:02:37.520 --> 0:02:41.240
<v Speaker 1>a product that you claim that Apple is going to announce.

0:02:41.280 --> 0:02:44.120
<v Speaker 1>Tim Cook is going to announce on stage at WWDC

0:02:44.720 --> 0:02:47.359
<v Speaker 1>on June Is it fifth? Is that the date? Yeah?

0:02:47.600 --> 0:02:49.240
<v Speaker 2>June fifth, Monday, June fifth.

0:02:49.040 --> 0:02:52.040
<v Speaker 1>Literally like next week, right, Yes, just give us the

0:02:52.120 --> 0:02:54.360
<v Speaker 1>quick like where did this come from? Because I have

0:02:54.400 --> 0:02:56.600
<v Speaker 1>a lot of questions about it? Yes, you just share

0:02:56.639 --> 0:02:58.639
<v Speaker 1>whatever you think is like a good setup for this thing.

0:03:00.080 --> 0:03:03.000
<v Speaker 2>Kicked off after the Apple Watch came out in twenty fifteen.

0:03:03.040 --> 0:03:05.760
<v Speaker 2>They were sort of looking for their next idea, right.

0:03:06.120 --> 0:03:08.880
<v Speaker 2>The hardware engineering group hired a guy named Mike Rockwell,

0:03:09.240 --> 0:03:12.160
<v Speaker 2>who was the CTO of Dolby and before that was

0:03:12.200 --> 0:03:17.200
<v Speaker 2>the CTO of Avid super Into Displays, super Into VR,

0:03:17.960 --> 0:03:23.000
<v Speaker 2>super Into high quality Audio. They hired Tom Holmansen, who

0:03:23.400 --> 0:03:27.720
<v Speaker 2>was the creator of THHX, which is the studio behind

0:03:27.960 --> 0:03:31.960
<v Speaker 2>the audio from Star Wars, which is, as everyone knows,

0:03:32.440 --> 0:03:35.520
<v Speaker 2>one of the paramount reasons people love Star Wars is

0:03:35.520 --> 0:03:38.080
<v Speaker 2>because of the soundtrack, right, and so this is a

0:03:38.160 --> 0:03:41.880
<v Speaker 2>music expert, and Apple's design team at the same time

0:03:42.320 --> 0:03:46.920
<v Speaker 2>was looking at virtual reality, augmented reality head worn devices,

0:03:47.600 --> 0:03:50.400
<v Speaker 2>and you know, one thing led to another. They came

0:03:50.440 --> 0:03:53.040
<v Speaker 2>together and they started working on this device. They did

0:03:53.240 --> 0:03:58.160
<v Speaker 2>many explorations around use cases. They used Samsung Gear vrs,

0:03:58.200 --> 0:04:01.680
<v Speaker 2>they used HDC vibes, they used every Nascent and VR

0:04:01.720 --> 0:04:04.280
<v Speaker 2>headset that was available eight years ago to run demos

0:04:04.280 --> 0:04:06.520
<v Speaker 2>on demo to Tim Cook, the executive team, the board

0:04:06.560 --> 0:04:07.160
<v Speaker 2>of directors.

0:04:07.280 --> 0:04:10.200
<v Speaker 1>Right, eight years ago they started working on this.

0:04:10.200 --> 0:04:12.880
<v Speaker 2>This is eight years ago, right. And you remember when

0:04:12.880 --> 0:04:16.320
<v Speaker 2>Steve Jobs announced the original iPhone, he said, this is

0:04:16.320 --> 0:04:18.080
<v Speaker 2>a day I've been looking forward to for two and

0:04:18.080 --> 0:04:19.599
<v Speaker 2>a half years, right.

0:04:19.800 --> 0:04:20.000
<v Speaker 1>Right.

0:04:20.040 --> 0:04:22.680
<v Speaker 2>You remember when the Apple Watch was announced, they said

0:04:22.680 --> 0:04:25.039
<v Speaker 2>that was about a two to three year development process. Right,

0:04:25.120 --> 0:04:28.880
<v Speaker 2>We're talking seven eight years here. Now there's more to it,

0:04:28.960 --> 0:04:31.880
<v Speaker 2>but you know that's a long development process.

0:04:32.000 --> 0:04:33.960
<v Speaker 1>I mean, here's what I'll say. I mean, I want

0:04:33.960 --> 0:04:36.240
<v Speaker 1>to hear all this backstory, but like I mean, I'm

0:04:36.279 --> 0:04:38.160
<v Speaker 1>a little bit in disbelief, like if you're in. By

0:04:38.200 --> 0:04:40.120
<v Speaker 1>the way, your scoop record, as I said at the

0:04:40.120 --> 0:04:43.039
<v Speaker 1>top of this, is very good. So you know, it's

0:04:43.160 --> 0:04:45.400
<v Speaker 1>rare that you write something and with this much detail,

0:04:45.480 --> 0:04:47.600
<v Speaker 1>Like look at the background here that you're sharing and

0:04:47.600 --> 0:04:49.839
<v Speaker 1>the stuff that you shared in your stories on Bloomberg. Right,

0:04:50.160 --> 0:04:52.200
<v Speaker 1>And I tweeted about this. I was and a lot

0:04:52.200 --> 0:04:54.920
<v Speaker 1>of people responded to this feels like the most unlike

0:04:55.040 --> 0:04:58.159
<v Speaker 1>Apple thing that I've ever heard of. It's like the

0:04:58.240 --> 0:05:02.360
<v Speaker 1>development process, the infighting. You you wrote about the infighting there,

0:05:02.480 --> 0:05:05.400
<v Speaker 1>the fact that this is a device that sits on

0:05:05.440 --> 0:05:09.240
<v Speaker 1>your face. Apple often comes into a market and like

0:05:09.640 --> 0:05:11.040
<v Speaker 1>it's like there's a little bit of a market and

0:05:11.040 --> 0:05:12.280
<v Speaker 1>they blow it up and they turn it into a

0:05:12.360 --> 0:05:15.000
<v Speaker 1>huge market. I don't even know if there is a

0:05:15.040 --> 0:05:19.200
<v Speaker 1>market for this in a widespread way, because like, getting

0:05:19.200 --> 0:05:21.880
<v Speaker 1>people to wear anything on their face is difficult. People

0:05:21.960 --> 0:05:26.440
<v Speaker 1>get laser surgery on their eyes to avoid wearing glasses, right,

0:05:26.839 --> 0:05:28.560
<v Speaker 1>and I like glasses, Like I'm a glass.

0:05:28.360 --> 0:05:31.440
<v Speaker 2>I'll tell you so. A few years ago, they were

0:05:31.480 --> 0:05:32.920
<v Speaker 2>trying to figure out how they can get the weight

0:05:33.000 --> 0:05:35.839
<v Speaker 2>down right in the device and the overall size. So

0:05:35.880 --> 0:05:38.719
<v Speaker 2>you're kind of screw your glasses my front because you're

0:05:38.839 --> 0:05:40.159
<v Speaker 2>not going to be able to wear those and the

0:05:40.200 --> 0:05:41.640
<v Speaker 2>headset together.

0:05:41.920 --> 0:05:44.599
<v Speaker 1>Okay, I mean that alone sounds okay. See everything you're saying.

0:05:44.640 --> 0:05:47.080
<v Speaker 1>See when I hear this shit, what I think is

0:05:47.120 --> 0:05:48.680
<v Speaker 1>and this is why I'm so like I wanted to

0:05:48.720 --> 0:05:51.400
<v Speaker 1>talk to you because I this just sounds like it's

0:05:51.440 --> 0:05:52.279
<v Speaker 1>not going to happen.

0:05:52.320 --> 0:05:54.680
<v Speaker 2>Well, there's going to be a prescription system where you

0:05:54.680 --> 0:05:57.400
<v Speaker 2>pay a couple hundred bucks and you'scriptions.

0:05:57.440 --> 0:05:59.040
<v Speaker 1>Does that sound like something Apple would do?

0:05:59.400 --> 0:05:59.479
<v Speaker 2>Like?

0:05:59.560 --> 0:06:00.440
<v Speaker 1>Does it? Actually?

0:06:01.279 --> 0:06:05.520
<v Speaker 2>It does? Okay, that specific feature, yes, but if you're

0:06:05.520 --> 0:06:08.919
<v Speaker 2>asking about this device in general, the answer would be no,

0:06:09.080 --> 0:06:13.000
<v Speaker 2>this is definitely the new Apple so to speak. Right, right,

0:06:13.200 --> 0:06:16.600
<v Speaker 2>this is they're trying something new. You know, depending on

0:06:16.640 --> 0:06:19.120
<v Speaker 2>who you talk to there, there's mixed confidence in how

0:06:19.160 --> 0:06:21.280
<v Speaker 2>this thing is going to do. But I think the

0:06:21.360 --> 0:06:24.479
<v Speaker 2>through line, what most people at the company, the decision

0:06:24.480 --> 0:06:27.599
<v Speaker 2>makers have understood, is that this thing is going to

0:06:27.680 --> 0:06:31.680
<v Speaker 2>start off remarkably slow. I think even maybe slower than

0:06:31.720 --> 0:06:34.760
<v Speaker 2>the Apple Watch. Right, actually, probably much slower than the

0:06:34.760 --> 0:06:35.280
<v Speaker 2>Apple Watch.

0:06:35.440 --> 0:06:37.920
<v Speaker 1>I would imagine it's going to be expensive too, right,

0:06:37.960 --> 0:06:38.600
<v Speaker 1>It's not cheap.

0:06:38.600 --> 0:06:41.039
<v Speaker 2>It's going to be expensive. It's going to be roughly

0:06:41.160 --> 0:06:45.520
<v Speaker 2>three thousand dollars. So I would say anywhere from the

0:06:45.600 --> 0:06:49.200
<v Speaker 2>high twos to the low threes. Now that's pretty you know,

0:06:49.279 --> 0:06:51.119
<v Speaker 2>eye melting. But if you look at the XR market

0:06:51.160 --> 0:06:54.599
<v Speaker 2>in general, they're probably in the Hollow Lens to Magic

0:06:54.680 --> 0:06:57.760
<v Speaker 2>Leap price range. Yeah, we know those two devices failed.

0:06:58.160 --> 0:07:00.159
<v Speaker 1>But I was going to say, Magic Leap is like

0:07:00.200 --> 0:07:03.520
<v Speaker 1>a they'll teach the story of Magical Leap in business

0:07:03.520 --> 0:07:07.520
<v Speaker 1>classes about like this vaporware company. Right, Like Magic Leap

0:07:07.560 --> 0:07:09.400
<v Speaker 1>was a company that was making a headset that people

0:07:09.400 --> 0:07:12.280
<v Speaker 1>were like, this is like magic. Literally when you put

0:07:12.280 --> 0:07:15.080
<v Speaker 1>it on, you're transported. It can do anything. It's the

0:07:15.440 --> 0:07:17.559
<v Speaker 1>it's the be all, end all, it's the next iPhone whatever.

0:07:17.600 --> 0:07:19.320
<v Speaker 1>And then the company just has fizzled out, like they'd

0:07:19.320 --> 0:07:22.400
<v Speaker 1>never been able to ship any real meaningful product, certainly

0:07:22.400 --> 0:07:26.440
<v Speaker 1>not a consumer facing product, right, Hollo lens. That's Microsoft's entrant, right,

0:07:26.480 --> 0:07:29.320
<v Speaker 1>which was a mixed reality. I mean, I think they

0:07:29.400 --> 0:07:34.120
<v Speaker 1>basically wanted to target enterprise, right. It was like a business,

0:07:34.520 --> 0:07:37.680
<v Speaker 1>a lab maybe like a warehouse type of device you

0:07:37.760 --> 0:07:41.080
<v Speaker 1>might use like for some ar assisted stuff. That's also

0:07:41.160 --> 0:07:43.160
<v Speaker 1>kind of fizzled, right, it has.

0:07:43.200 --> 0:07:45.480
<v Speaker 2>But Apple's going to shoehorn this thing into working out.

0:07:45.520 --> 0:07:47.600
<v Speaker 2>I mean that's my belief.

0:07:48.840 --> 0:07:50.880
<v Speaker 1>You think this is not only that this is going

0:07:50.920 --> 0:07:53.600
<v Speaker 1>to happen for real, you believe that that they're going

0:07:53.640 --> 0:07:54.640
<v Speaker 1>to announce this product.

0:07:54.680 --> 0:07:56.160
<v Speaker 2>I'm in trouble if they don't.

0:07:56.440 --> 0:07:59.800
<v Speaker 1>But yes, right of course, yes, But I mean, you know, listen,

0:08:00.720 --> 0:08:03.280
<v Speaker 1>the way you write it, though, is the kind of

0:08:03.280 --> 0:08:05.440
<v Speaker 1>product that they could get very close to and then

0:08:05.560 --> 0:08:07.800
<v Speaker 1>look at it, do the demo and say, you know what,

0:08:07.840 --> 0:08:10.160
<v Speaker 1>like it's not there yet, right, Like that that has

0:08:10.240 --> 0:08:11.520
<v Speaker 1>happened well.

0:08:11.240 --> 0:08:13.800
<v Speaker 2>Back to the like the more comparing the timelines on

0:08:13.880 --> 0:08:17.360
<v Speaker 2>development processes three years for the previous two products and

0:08:17.400 --> 0:08:20.560
<v Speaker 2>then eight years for this. Let's see, this has been

0:08:20.560 --> 0:08:24.160
<v Speaker 2>delayed three or four times. The original original original pipe

0:08:24.200 --> 0:08:27.600
<v Speaker 2>dream was twenty twenty. Obviously that got pushed to twenty one,

0:08:27.680 --> 0:08:30.760
<v Speaker 2>then twenty two, and then twenty three. They were going

0:08:30.800 --> 0:08:33.000
<v Speaker 2>to announce it in January, then they were gonna announce

0:08:33.000 --> 0:08:36.439
<v Speaker 2>it in the spring. Right, and here we are WWDC.

0:08:36.640 --> 0:08:39.480
<v Speaker 2>It's it's locked, It's it's locked and loaded. At this point,

0:08:40.360 --> 0:08:41.760
<v Speaker 2>I don't see any way around that.

0:08:42.240 --> 0:08:44.480
<v Speaker 1>Can you describe it like physically? Do you know? Have

0:08:44.520 --> 0:08:46.120
<v Speaker 1>you seen it? Have you tried it?

0:08:46.320 --> 0:08:48.320
<v Speaker 2>I have not tried it. I've tried the Quest three,

0:08:48.559 --> 0:08:49.680
<v Speaker 2>but I have not tried this one.

0:08:49.880 --> 0:08:52.040
<v Speaker 1>Okay, but the Quest three is not we're not talking it.

0:08:52.040 --> 0:08:54.080
<v Speaker 1>That's not in the same ballpark. No I know has

0:08:54.120 --> 0:08:56.520
<v Speaker 1>this right? So you wrote about it having an external

0:08:56.559 --> 0:08:59.120
<v Speaker 1>battery pack. First off, is that staying.

0:08:59.760 --> 0:09:02.160
<v Speaker 2>You know, like the mag Safe battery like they started

0:09:02.160 --> 0:09:03.439
<v Speaker 2>selling a few years that you can put on the

0:09:03.480 --> 0:09:06.040
<v Speaker 2>back of the iPhone anchor if you other companies sell

0:09:06.080 --> 0:09:08.760
<v Speaker 2>that looks like that about bigger. It's about the size

0:09:08.760 --> 0:09:12.800
<v Speaker 2>of an iPhone and you connected over a cable. The

0:09:12.800 --> 0:09:14.880
<v Speaker 2>cable is lodged into the battery pack, you plug it

0:09:14.920 --> 0:09:17.480
<v Speaker 2>into the headset and it goes over a wire. And

0:09:17.640 --> 0:09:21.360
<v Speaker 2>the two considerations there were safety and weight. Obviously, with

0:09:21.400 --> 0:09:23.840
<v Speaker 2>the product like this, you wanted as portable as possible

0:09:23.880 --> 0:09:26.480
<v Speaker 2>and as light as possible, right, and getting the battery

0:09:26.480 --> 0:09:29.640
<v Speaker 2>out of there was a big help in my thinking,

0:09:29.760 --> 0:09:31.959
<v Speaker 2>is even though they wanted to get the battery in

0:09:32.000 --> 0:09:34.439
<v Speaker 2>there initially, and even though for these types of products

0:09:34.440 --> 0:09:36.400
<v Speaker 2>you do want the battery to eventually be in the

0:09:37.200 --> 0:09:41.199
<v Speaker 2>frame itself. Remember the Apple Wash they launched with one

0:09:41.280 --> 0:09:45.000
<v Speaker 2>day of battery life, and the initial speculation was, oh,

0:09:45.000 --> 0:09:47.120
<v Speaker 2>over time, they're going to increase the battery life. Now sure,

0:09:47.120 --> 0:09:48.720
<v Speaker 2>ten years later we got the Apple Watch Ultro.

0:09:49.120 --> 0:09:51.800
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, it's only a little bit increased. It's like, right,

0:09:51.800 --> 0:09:53.920
<v Speaker 1>two three days instead of one. It's not that great,

0:09:54.600 --> 0:09:55.040
<v Speaker 1>that's right.

0:09:55.040 --> 0:09:57.480
<v Speaker 2>But in what they did, they had two options, right,

0:09:57.840 --> 0:10:02.800
<v Speaker 2>they had let's add to the battery life, or let's

0:10:02.800 --> 0:10:05.480
<v Speaker 2>add more and more power and functionality without reducing the

0:10:05.520 --> 0:10:06.240
<v Speaker 2>battery life.

0:10:06.400 --> 0:10:07.000
<v Speaker 1>Right.

0:10:07.160 --> 0:10:09.280
<v Speaker 2>They've done that with the iPad as well. Obviously, the

0:10:09.320 --> 0:10:11.440
<v Speaker 2>iPhone's a bit different they had to go in a

0:10:11.960 --> 0:10:14.920
<v Speaker 2>situation where they had to increase the performance and increase

0:10:14.960 --> 0:10:17.800
<v Speaker 2>battery life. Right, but I think the headset were probably

0:10:17.800 --> 0:10:21.040
<v Speaker 2>locked into this external battery situation for years to come,

0:10:21.280 --> 0:10:23.680
<v Speaker 2>and ideas people are gonna be okay with that, let's

0:10:23.679 --> 0:10:27.200
<v Speaker 2>add more performance rather than sort of taper it down

0:10:27.320 --> 0:10:30.120
<v Speaker 2>and get the battery back inside. I want to talk

0:10:30.160 --> 0:10:31.040
<v Speaker 2>about the naming thing.

0:10:30.960 --> 0:10:32.640
<v Speaker 1>For a minute though, Yeah, yeah, please do it, please

0:10:32.640 --> 0:10:33.400
<v Speaker 1>do So.

0:10:33.480 --> 0:10:37.120
<v Speaker 2>They've trademarked quite a few names, right, So, they trademarked

0:10:37.160 --> 0:10:40.920
<v Speaker 2>the name Reality one. They trademarked the name Reality Pro.

0:10:41.520 --> 0:10:46.359
<v Speaker 2>They've trademarked a few potential operating system names. They've trademarked

0:10:46.400 --> 0:10:50.559
<v Speaker 2>the name Reality OS. They've trade marked the name XROS.

0:10:50.840 --> 0:10:54.959
<v Speaker 2>They've trademarked the name Reality PROS and XR pros. Right,

0:10:55.200 --> 0:10:57.600
<v Speaker 2>here's what I can tell you for fact, Right, for fact,

0:10:57.880 --> 0:11:01.680
<v Speaker 2>the OS itself is going to be called XR OS.

0:11:02.040 --> 0:11:02.400
<v Speaker 1>Right.

0:11:02.640 --> 0:11:04.960
<v Speaker 2>They were originally going to call it Reality OS. It

0:11:05.040 --> 0:11:07.920
<v Speaker 2>was sort of the working title, so to speak. It

0:11:08.000 --> 0:11:10.319
<v Speaker 2>was your this is my next before the verbs. Right.

0:11:11.000 --> 0:11:13.760
<v Speaker 1>We don't like that, yeah, yeah, right, So it was.

0:11:13.720 --> 0:11:17.000
<v Speaker 2>Going to be Reality OS, and then last year they

0:11:17.040 --> 0:11:20.040
<v Speaker 2>moved from the working title to the real name, which

0:11:20.080 --> 0:11:23.480
<v Speaker 2>is XR OS right. Now. I think there are a

0:11:23.559 --> 0:11:25.640
<v Speaker 2>couple of reasons for that. One. I think the word

0:11:25.679 --> 0:11:32.080
<v Speaker 2>reality probably doesn't translate so cleanly internationally, right, But I

0:11:32.120 --> 0:11:34.840
<v Speaker 2>think it's a more understandable term, at least in the

0:11:34.840 --> 0:11:36.360
<v Speaker 2>English language than x R.

0:11:36.679 --> 0:11:39.360
<v Speaker 1>Right. Yeah, XR sounds like a motorcycle, right.

0:11:39.640 --> 0:11:41.720
<v Speaker 2>But it also sounds a little bit more high tech, right,

0:11:41.760 --> 0:11:44.600
<v Speaker 2>And Apples tries to sort of bridge that idea of

0:11:44.679 --> 0:11:48.079
<v Speaker 2>mixing tech with you know, mass understanding. So it's a

0:11:48.080 --> 0:11:51.640
<v Speaker 2>little odd there. But this is a highly technical product,

0:11:51.920 --> 0:11:53.800
<v Speaker 2>and I think it's initially going to appeal to a

0:11:53.880 --> 0:11:56.840
<v Speaker 2>very niche audience, So perhaps it makes sense. What they

0:11:56.880 --> 0:11:59.040
<v Speaker 2>really are trying to do is sort of, in their minds,

0:11:59.080 --> 0:12:02.000
<v Speaker 2>create this x mixed reality market, and so it would

0:12:02.040 --> 0:12:05.240
<v Speaker 2>help them own that market from a marketing standpoint, the

0:12:05.360 --> 0:12:08.880
<v Speaker 2>XR market. Back to the naming conventions, so they went

0:12:08.920 --> 0:12:12.959
<v Speaker 2>from reality OS right to XROS. And if you have

0:12:13.080 --> 0:12:16.520
<v Speaker 2>an operating system called reality OS, the logic would be

0:12:16.600 --> 0:12:19.720
<v Speaker 2>that the device itself would be called the reality right

0:12:19.840 --> 0:12:23.320
<v Speaker 2>or the Reality pro, just like the iPad runs iPad OS,

0:12:23.440 --> 0:12:26.560
<v Speaker 2>the watch, watch OS, TV t v OS et cetera. Right,

0:12:27.000 --> 0:12:32.160
<v Speaker 2>they've switched to XROS on the operating system name. Does

0:12:32.200 --> 0:12:36.359
<v Speaker 2>that mean the device is called the XR Pro running XROS.

0:12:36.880 --> 0:12:39.000
<v Speaker 2>Does it make sense to have a Reality Pro running

0:12:39.120 --> 0:12:40.720
<v Speaker 2>XROS or does it make more sense to have an

0:12:40.840 --> 0:12:44.720
<v Speaker 2>XR pro running XROS? What Apple release a product called

0:12:44.720 --> 0:12:47.360
<v Speaker 2>the XR Pro, Like the mass consumer is not going

0:12:47.440 --> 0:12:51.160
<v Speaker 2>to know what XR pro means? Right? And so those

0:12:51.240 --> 0:12:53.560
<v Speaker 2>are the questions I'd like to see answered, which will

0:12:53.559 --> 0:12:57.080
<v Speaker 2>obviously be answered. It's WWDC, Right, That's what's been on

0:12:57.120 --> 0:12:57.800
<v Speaker 2>my mind lately.

0:12:58.120 --> 0:13:02.439
<v Speaker 1>That's interesting. XR is I mean presumably that means mixed reality, right?

0:13:02.480 --> 0:13:04.520
<v Speaker 1>Is that what we're supposed to be XR is? Or

0:13:04.640 --> 0:13:07.280
<v Speaker 1>I mean x has usually not used the mixed but

0:13:07.480 --> 0:13:11.640
<v Speaker 1>crossed reality, mixed reality whatever let's call it. That makes

0:13:11.679 --> 0:13:14.560
<v Speaker 1>sense in a global way of describing it, right, like

0:13:14.840 --> 0:13:17.840
<v Speaker 1>the for the format. Forget about whether they call it

0:13:17.880 --> 0:13:21.120
<v Speaker 1>reality or XR. Look, I've seen a lot of really

0:13:21.120 --> 0:13:23.760
<v Speaker 1>impressive demos of mixed reality, and I'm sure you have

0:13:23.800 --> 0:13:25.680
<v Speaker 1>as well. I've seen a lot of and no doubt

0:13:25.720 --> 0:13:27.680
<v Speaker 1>Apple can do this better than anybody. Like, I'm not

0:13:27.760 --> 0:13:31.800
<v Speaker 1>questioning that they can't execute something that's a better product, right,

0:13:31.840 --> 0:13:34.520
<v Speaker 1>we know that they can. They can take a smartphone,

0:13:34.559 --> 0:13:36.040
<v Speaker 1>You've seen a million of them, and they can make

0:13:36.080 --> 0:13:39.520
<v Speaker 1>it something really special and really like cohesive. What I

0:13:39.600 --> 0:13:42.040
<v Speaker 1>wonder though, in what's sort of not in your in

0:13:42.120 --> 0:13:47.319
<v Speaker 1>that bigger piece, is a question about the consumer aspect

0:13:47.360 --> 0:13:51.439
<v Speaker 1>of it, the relationship to consumer desire. Listen, as a

0:13:51.480 --> 0:13:54.400
<v Speaker 1>guy who's tried all the VR headsets, was unbelievably excited

0:13:54.400 --> 0:13:57.000
<v Speaker 1>about Oculus when they first appeared. Was like the biggest

0:13:57.080 --> 0:14:00.320
<v Speaker 1>fan in the world. I've dreamed of VR my whole life.

0:14:00.360 --> 0:14:03.080
<v Speaker 1>Like all of the experiences have not only have they

0:14:03.120 --> 0:14:06.360
<v Speaker 1>been like ultimately sort of impressive, but disappointing in the

0:14:06.400 --> 0:14:09.640
<v Speaker 1>long run. What I found is like, oh, wearing this

0:14:09.679 --> 0:14:12.880
<v Speaker 1>thing on my head and being removed from reality and

0:14:12.920 --> 0:14:16.319
<v Speaker 1>having these experiences, it's a very kind of like singular

0:14:16.480 --> 0:14:19.320
<v Speaker 1>private experience that you can only do once in a while.

0:14:19.920 --> 0:14:21.960
<v Speaker 1>And I'm a nerd, Okay, remember I'm one of the

0:14:21.960 --> 0:14:24.640
<v Speaker 1>biggest fucking nerds in the world. They also make me

0:14:24.720 --> 0:14:27.480
<v Speaker 1>motion sick, Okay, Like, those experiences.

0:14:27.040 --> 0:14:29.280
<v Speaker 2>Have problems, right, I don't want to get too tmi.

0:14:29.520 --> 0:14:33.520
<v Speaker 2>But the first time I tried the quest this was

0:14:33.560 --> 0:14:38.000
<v Speaker 2>the original quest. I had lunch before using it. It

0:14:38.080 --> 0:14:40.560
<v Speaker 2>wasn't so pretty and so, oh my god, you really

0:14:40.600 --> 0:14:43.960
<v Speaker 2>got to get the IPD correct right, the pupil distance.

0:14:43.760 --> 0:14:45.600
<v Speaker 1>Right, you have to the latency has to be But

0:14:45.680 --> 0:14:48.240
<v Speaker 1>even then, I don't know that. Like you still are

0:14:48.360 --> 0:14:50.640
<v Speaker 1>challenged by lots of different things. But so this is

0:14:50.680 --> 0:14:54.480
<v Speaker 1>the thing, Like I understand consumers wear watches, right, Like

0:14:54.520 --> 0:14:56.280
<v Speaker 1>I can make an art. I can hear the argument

0:14:56.360 --> 0:14:59.160
<v Speaker 1>at Apple like, hey, they wear these things in their wrists, right,

0:14:59.360 --> 0:15:00.800
<v Speaker 1>maybe more people I would wear it if we could

0:15:00.800 --> 0:15:02.560
<v Speaker 1>give them a reason to put it on. You know,

0:15:02.600 --> 0:15:04.480
<v Speaker 1>there's already health trackers. We know that's a big market.

0:15:04.480 --> 0:15:06.920
<v Speaker 1>We could bite into that market. There's already a watch market.

0:15:07.000 --> 0:15:08.360
<v Speaker 1>It's a big market. We know we could bite into

0:15:08.400 --> 0:15:10.880
<v Speaker 1>that market. Maybe not everybody wants to wear the Apple Watch,

0:15:10.920 --> 0:15:12.880
<v Speaker 1>but we can bring people around over time, and they

0:15:12.880 --> 0:15:14.720
<v Speaker 1>certainly did. Like I'm one of those people's like I

0:15:14.760 --> 0:15:16.480
<v Speaker 1>don't want I don't need it, And then I was like, wow,

0:15:16.640 --> 0:15:17.440
<v Speaker 1>I love wearing it.

0:15:17.480 --> 0:15:18.720
<v Speaker 2>I was the same, I could believe it or not.

0:15:18.800 --> 0:15:20.920
<v Speaker 2>I didn't wear an Apple Watch until the series five.

0:15:21.400 --> 0:15:23.480
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, I mean I tried a couple of them, and

0:15:23.520 --> 0:15:25.200
<v Speaker 1>I was like, it's not for me. I wore regular

0:15:25.200 --> 0:15:27.960
<v Speaker 1>analog watches, and then like the last couple of years,

0:15:28.000 --> 0:15:30.440
<v Speaker 1>I was started wearing a garment for exercise and I

0:15:30.480 --> 0:15:32.280
<v Speaker 1>was like oh. When the Aultra came out, I was like, Okay,

0:15:32.280 --> 0:15:43.840
<v Speaker 1>this is like actually what I want. Yeah, But here's

0:15:43.840 --> 0:15:46.720
<v Speaker 1>the thing I am not hearing or seeing. And I

0:15:46.760 --> 0:15:48.600
<v Speaker 1>say this as a person who would love to see

0:15:48.800 --> 0:15:52.480
<v Speaker 1>a real broad consumer use case. I feel like when

0:15:52.480 --> 0:15:54.760
<v Speaker 1>you write about it, it feels like this product from

0:15:55.200 --> 0:15:58.520
<v Speaker 1>that era that you describe as like which where the

0:15:58.680 --> 0:16:01.760
<v Speaker 1>HCC is getting into it and quest is coming, you know, meta,

0:16:02.160 --> 0:16:05.240
<v Speaker 1>it buys oculus and they start doing question and again

0:16:05.280 --> 0:16:07.600
<v Speaker 1>and I get it. Samsung was trying to do VR stuff.

0:16:07.640 --> 0:16:10.280
<v Speaker 1>It's like many many years ago. This feels like a

0:16:10.280 --> 0:16:13.480
<v Speaker 1>product from a time when the excitement around that still

0:16:13.480 --> 0:16:15.360
<v Speaker 1>seem new and like possible.

0:16:15.520 --> 0:16:15.760
<v Speaker 2>Right.

0:16:15.960 --> 0:16:19.640
<v Speaker 1>I don't think consumers have embraced these products and even

0:16:19.680 --> 0:16:22.840
<v Speaker 1>want them. And so what is Apple saying internally or

0:16:22.840 --> 0:16:24.880
<v Speaker 1>what are they how are they testing internally? I know

0:16:24.880 --> 0:16:27.280
<v Speaker 1>they're like the consumer doesn't know what it wants or whatever,

0:16:27.360 --> 0:16:29.560
<v Speaker 1>but can you give me some color on like what's

0:16:29.600 --> 0:16:32.520
<v Speaker 1>going on with their relationship to a consumer audience for this.

0:16:33.240 --> 0:16:34.880
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, I mean that is a good question. You know,

0:16:34.920 --> 0:16:36.560
<v Speaker 2>if you pull one hundred people on the street to

0:16:36.560 --> 0:16:38.240
<v Speaker 2>ask them if this is something that they're going to

0:16:38.360 --> 0:16:40.040
<v Speaker 2>use on a daily basis, the number is going to

0:16:40.080 --> 0:16:43.440
<v Speaker 2>probably be incredibly small. What I think is that they

0:16:43.480 --> 0:16:46.760
<v Speaker 2>see this as a very very long term thing, like

0:16:47.640 --> 0:16:51.320
<v Speaker 2>ten years long term. And one thing I believe they're

0:16:51.320 --> 0:16:53.240
<v Speaker 2>going to try to do is position it as quote,

0:16:53.240 --> 0:16:55.960
<v Speaker 2>the future of the computer. I think they see this

0:16:56.000 --> 0:16:59.960
<v Speaker 2>as something that's a Mac replacement or an iPad replacement,

0:17:00.280 --> 0:17:02.800
<v Speaker 2>So maybe five years from now you won't own a Mac,

0:17:03.120 --> 0:17:07.400
<v Speaker 2>you'll own a headset instead. I say that as being

0:17:07.440 --> 0:17:09.360
<v Speaker 2>around long enough to know how many people were saying

0:17:09.400 --> 0:17:13.119
<v Speaker 2>that about the iPad, and I know very few people

0:17:13.200 --> 0:17:16.760
<v Speaker 2>personally who've transitioned from a Mac to an iPad. Fully,

0:17:16.920 --> 0:17:19.880
<v Speaker 2>I will say there are millions of people who have right,

0:17:20.240 --> 0:17:22.479
<v Speaker 2>so don't get me wrong, but I think it's going

0:17:22.560 --> 0:17:24.840
<v Speaker 2>to play out similarly to that. I mean, the best

0:17:24.960 --> 0:17:27.679
<v Speaker 2>estimates that I'm hearing are the most optimistic estimates I'm hearing.

0:17:28.080 --> 0:17:30.399
<v Speaker 2>Is this bringing in about twenty five billion a year

0:17:30.440 --> 0:17:33.119
<v Speaker 2>in revenue. That puts it on part the iPad and

0:17:33.160 --> 0:17:36.200
<v Speaker 2>the Apple Watch, which is not nothing. It's not nothing

0:17:36.240 --> 0:17:38.760
<v Speaker 2>for Apple to show growth that's good enough. They're going

0:17:38.840 --> 0:17:41.159
<v Speaker 2>to make a big return on this investment. Within a

0:17:41.200 --> 0:17:43.760
<v Speaker 2>few years. They're going to become the market leader in

0:17:43.960 --> 0:17:47.640
<v Speaker 2>XR in terms of unit sales and revenue probably within

0:17:47.880 --> 0:17:51.639
<v Speaker 2>six months, or revenue within six months. Unit sales probably

0:17:51.640 --> 0:17:55.360
<v Speaker 2>not as quickly. So you know, from a market standpoint,

0:17:55.520 --> 0:17:57.920
<v Speaker 2>it's going to be a success out of the gate.

0:17:58.520 --> 0:18:01.080
<v Speaker 2>Apple standpoint, it's going to be a flop out of

0:18:01.119 --> 0:18:04.760
<v Speaker 2>the gate, I think, but eventually be hugely successful. Like

0:18:04.840 --> 0:18:07.280
<v Speaker 2>I really believe in this long term you do because

0:18:07.280 --> 0:18:09.240
<v Speaker 2>of the investment, Yeah, I do. The ga Apple's not

0:18:09.240 --> 0:18:10.720
<v Speaker 2>going to give up on this, right, even if it

0:18:10.720 --> 0:18:13.240
<v Speaker 2>takes five ten years. They're going to shoehorn this thing

0:18:13.920 --> 0:18:15.760
<v Speaker 2>till it works out. You know, the price is going

0:18:15.800 --> 0:18:18.119
<v Speaker 2>to come down eventually too. You're going to get new

0:18:18.160 --> 0:18:20.760
<v Speaker 2>features like cellular. There are going to be big enough

0:18:20.760 --> 0:18:23.640
<v Speaker 2>improvements and a big marketing budget behind it to get

0:18:23.680 --> 0:18:25.960
<v Speaker 2>people interested in this. Right, They're going to make a

0:18:25.960 --> 0:18:28.080
<v Speaker 2>whole big deal about this thing in Apple retail stores.

0:18:28.080 --> 0:18:30.320
<v Speaker 2>It's going to drive foot traffic. They're going to try

0:18:30.359 --> 0:18:32.840
<v Speaker 2>selling other products to people who are just coming in

0:18:32.840 --> 0:18:36.160
<v Speaker 2>to try this thing on. It'll be a big marketing exer,

0:18:36.240 --> 0:18:36.359
<v Speaker 2>so a.

0:18:36.359 --> 0:18:39.760
<v Speaker 1>Lot of accessories, I'm sure a lot of accessories. Right. So,

0:18:39.920 --> 0:18:42.159
<v Speaker 1>like everything you're describing sounds very app right, and I

0:18:42.200 --> 0:18:44.760
<v Speaker 1>think like the long the long play is possible, right,

0:18:44.800 --> 0:18:46.600
<v Speaker 1>They definitely like the I mean, I've had a good

0:18:46.600 --> 0:18:50.000
<v Speaker 1>example of something that has never found a perfect home,

0:18:50.000 --> 0:18:52.480
<v Speaker 1>but definitely there's a big market for it. And they've

0:18:52.480 --> 0:18:55.399
<v Speaker 1>created that market really for tablets, right, right, And I

0:18:55.440 --> 0:18:58.919
<v Speaker 1>think you're right, Like I've grown to become an iPad user,

0:18:59.080 --> 0:19:01.560
<v Speaker 1>and in fact, they just released some greats that like Logic,

0:19:01.880 --> 0:19:05.359
<v Speaker 1>the music software that has been Mac only for a

0:19:05.400 --> 0:19:07.720
<v Speaker 1>really long time. They were a music guy before this, right,

0:19:07.760 --> 0:19:08.680
<v Speaker 1>I used to produce music.

0:19:08.760 --> 0:19:10.840
<v Speaker 2>Right, I'm curious what you think, Well, I'll.

0:19:10.680 --> 0:19:12.360
<v Speaker 1>Tell you what I think. I think it's fucking amazing.

0:19:12.520 --> 0:19:14.520
<v Speaker 1>And I have been sitting on my iPad at night,

0:19:14.600 --> 0:19:18.200
<v Speaker 1>like in my downtime, making music in Logic. Now there's

0:19:18.240 --> 0:19:19.919
<v Speaker 1>some stuff that's like a little bit yanky because it's

0:19:19.960 --> 0:19:23.320
<v Speaker 1>like the iPad the way it works is just weird

0:19:23.400 --> 0:19:25.280
<v Speaker 1>for things where you need lots of windows, like it

0:19:25.359 --> 0:19:27.800
<v Speaker 1>just doesn't want to do that. But like in terms

0:19:27.840 --> 0:19:30.840
<v Speaker 1>of a tool. It's like unbelievably powerful and really really

0:19:30.880 --> 0:19:32.600
<v Speaker 1>good for what it's like what you want it to be.

0:19:32.680 --> 0:19:34.520
<v Speaker 2>And I think it's going to work in the headset.

0:19:34.640 --> 0:19:36.440
<v Speaker 2>I think that app run in the headset.

0:19:36.680 --> 0:19:39.400
<v Speaker 1>So that sounds like a super fun like I can see,

0:19:39.520 --> 0:19:41.520
<v Speaker 1>like listen, I mean Jaron Lanier, who is the guy

0:19:41.560 --> 0:19:45.120
<v Speaker 1>who basically invented VR, who's written about technology for years,

0:19:45.119 --> 0:19:47.720
<v Speaker 1>for decades and decades, he's really like become like a

0:19:47.760 --> 0:19:51.919
<v Speaker 1>philosopher when it comes to this technology. Originally, you know,

0:19:52.000 --> 0:19:54.760
<v Speaker 1>kind of created VR for this purpose of working in

0:19:54.800 --> 0:19:56.560
<v Speaker 1>a larger space, Like he was dealing with these really

0:19:56.640 --> 0:19:58.560
<v Speaker 1>large numbers that you couldn't look out on a monitor.

0:19:59.200 --> 0:20:02.560
<v Speaker 1>So I see the commercial applications there, right, I can

0:20:02.600 --> 0:20:04.960
<v Speaker 1>see like there's going to be places, like I said,

0:20:05.000 --> 0:20:07.920
<v Speaker 1>where hollow Lens was maybe targeting, or where magic Leap

0:20:07.920 --> 0:20:09.760
<v Speaker 1>hope to target where I can see more of a

0:20:09.800 --> 0:20:13.960
<v Speaker 1>retail or commercial application. What's so weird to me though,

0:20:14.080 --> 0:20:17.520
<v Speaker 1>is if you look at the landscape of today, right

0:20:18.119 --> 0:20:20.800
<v Speaker 1>so peak COVID, I'd see this as being a really

0:20:20.840 --> 0:20:23.359
<v Speaker 1>attractive product, right like when we were had peak COVID,

0:20:23.359 --> 0:20:26.360
<v Speaker 1>when everybody was at home we had lockdowns, we had

0:20:26.440 --> 0:20:28.800
<v Speaker 1>like everybody was scared to kind of go out and socialize.

0:20:28.840 --> 0:20:31.160
<v Speaker 1>Like I think that's when you know, that's when Facebook

0:20:31.200 --> 0:20:33.800
<v Speaker 1>tried to kind of capture with their metaverse bullshit. They

0:20:33.880 --> 0:20:36.360
<v Speaker 1>kind of tried to capture this moment of like, hey,

0:20:36.400 --> 0:20:38.280
<v Speaker 1>we're going to all move to this different kind of

0:20:38.320 --> 0:20:41.560
<v Speaker 1>like way of communicating and computing and working and blah

0:20:41.560 --> 0:20:43.800
<v Speaker 1>blah blah. But I feel like if you look at

0:20:43.800 --> 0:20:46.280
<v Speaker 1>the hit rate now again and maybe this Apple sees

0:20:46.359 --> 0:20:49.119
<v Speaker 1>that as a market opportunity, it feels like such an

0:20:49.280 --> 0:20:54.080
<v Speaker 1>off key entry. Like we've seen so many versions of

0:20:54.080 --> 0:20:56.840
<v Speaker 1>this that had been really rejected and in fact, like

0:20:57.600 --> 0:21:01.280
<v Speaker 1>none surprisingly, but Facebook's huge pivot was basically rejected as

0:21:01.320 --> 0:21:04.159
<v Speaker 1>this concept of the metaverse and being more like what

0:21:04.240 --> 0:21:06.800
<v Speaker 1>I see from society. And frankly, what Tim Cook has

0:21:06.840 --> 0:21:11.080
<v Speaker 1>actually said at many intervals on stage is like people

0:21:11.160 --> 0:21:14.600
<v Speaker 1>want less of this, like of this stuff in their life.

0:21:14.600 --> 0:21:17.840
<v Speaker 1>They want to be less immersed in technology. When they

0:21:17.840 --> 0:21:19.399
<v Speaker 1>talked about the watch, they were like, we want you

0:21:19.440 --> 0:21:21.280
<v Speaker 1>to be less distracted by your phone and you can

0:21:21.320 --> 0:21:23.000
<v Speaker 1>get up on your you know, do your thing. You

0:21:23.000 --> 0:21:26.040
<v Speaker 1>can just glance at your watch and all this it

0:21:26.160 --> 0:21:28.119
<v Speaker 1>just feels like it flies in the face of And

0:21:28.160 --> 0:21:29.760
<v Speaker 1>Tim Cook was a big part of this, right, Like

0:21:29.800 --> 0:21:32.160
<v Speaker 1>he pushed this, This is like his product in some way,

0:21:32.680 --> 0:21:34.960
<v Speaker 1>he wanted this to happen. I mean, he runs the company.

0:21:35.600 --> 0:21:37.400
<v Speaker 1>This doesn't feel like it flies in the face of

0:21:37.440 --> 0:21:40.199
<v Speaker 1>everything that, like the industry has told us and that

0:21:40.240 --> 0:21:41.760
<v Speaker 1>consumers have told us about this.

0:21:42.520 --> 0:21:45.760
<v Speaker 2>Yes, but I think one of the most fundamental aspects

0:21:45.800 --> 0:21:48.879
<v Speaker 2>from early on in development was how you make VR

0:21:49.000 --> 0:21:52.760
<v Speaker 2>socially acceptable and how you take people in VR without

0:21:52.760 --> 0:21:55.320
<v Speaker 2>removing them from the real world. And there's a few

0:21:55.320 --> 0:21:58.760
<v Speaker 2>tricks they have up their sleeve on that. One is

0:21:58.840 --> 0:22:02.040
<v Speaker 2>this external display that they've been working on from the

0:22:02.119 --> 0:22:05.320
<v Speaker 2>very beginning for the headset, where it's essentially you can

0:22:05.400 --> 0:22:07.879
<v Speaker 2>see you have this front ole a display and you

0:22:07.920 --> 0:22:10.800
<v Speaker 2>see the person's eyes who's wearing it, and so like

0:22:11.160 --> 0:22:14.040
<v Speaker 2>it's sort of like they're there or not there.

0:22:14.880 --> 0:22:17.720
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, I mean this sounds insane, right, Like just hearing

0:22:17.760 --> 0:22:20.159
<v Speaker 1>you describe that, you're saying that on the outside of

0:22:19.920 --> 0:22:23.679
<v Speaker 1>these basically look like ski goggles, right right, this device

0:22:23.760 --> 0:22:26.280
<v Speaker 1>is something like that you're saying on the outside surface

0:22:26.320 --> 0:22:28.560
<v Speaker 1>of it, is it covering the whole surface of the

0:22:28.560 --> 0:22:30.040
<v Speaker 1>outside the screen.

0:22:30.160 --> 0:22:33.280
<v Speaker 2>Do you know the screen A portion of it, Yeah,

0:22:33.359 --> 0:22:35.320
<v Speaker 2>where your eyes would be, and you can you know

0:22:35.320 --> 0:22:38.240
<v Speaker 2>you're moving your eyes and you can you know you're blinking.

0:22:38.440 --> 0:22:40.960
<v Speaker 1>And so there's cameras inside of the there's some kind

0:22:40.960 --> 0:22:43.000
<v Speaker 1>of camera inside of the goggles that are tracking your

0:22:43.040 --> 0:22:43.760
<v Speaker 1>eye movements.

0:22:44.080 --> 0:22:45.480
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, eye tracking, right.

0:22:45.320 --> 0:22:47.359
<v Speaker 1>And so then it's showing people on the outside. So

0:22:47.800 --> 0:22:50.120
<v Speaker 1>do they think that you'd be walking around in public

0:22:50.160 --> 0:22:51.120
<v Speaker 1>wearing this headset?

0:22:51.640 --> 0:22:53.919
<v Speaker 2>There was a demo internally, and not only that, that

0:22:53.960 --> 0:22:55.640
<v Speaker 2>you would wear it to a party, which I think

0:22:55.720 --> 0:22:56.440
<v Speaker 2>is ridiculous.

0:22:56.480 --> 0:22:58.480
<v Speaker 1>But I mean, this is the thing, Like, think about

0:22:58.480 --> 0:23:00.320
<v Speaker 1>a bunch of people at a party wearing the things

0:23:00.320 --> 0:23:04.680
<v Speaker 1>on their face and try to imagine a desire there.

0:23:04.880 --> 0:23:05.480
<v Speaker 2>I would leave.

0:23:05.560 --> 0:23:07.959
<v Speaker 1>Now, I'm kidding right now, you probably, I mean, if

0:23:08.000 --> 0:23:10.640
<v Speaker 1>you didn't have one, you certainly would leave. Right, That's

0:23:10.680 --> 0:23:11.760
<v Speaker 1>the point, right.

0:23:11.840 --> 0:23:13.720
<v Speaker 2>I don't think they're gonna they're going to try to

0:23:13.760 --> 0:23:16.280
<v Speaker 2>make this socially acceptable. The other thing they've done from

0:23:16.320 --> 0:23:19.320
<v Speaker 2>a technology standpoint, it is a it's a VR headset,

0:23:19.920 --> 0:23:22.440
<v Speaker 2>but they've shoehorned AR into there as a very core

0:23:22.480 --> 0:23:25.600
<v Speaker 2>component of it. Because you have these dozen external cameras

0:23:26.160 --> 0:23:28.240
<v Speaker 2>and you have the crown on the Apple Watch. You

0:23:28.240 --> 0:23:31.960
<v Speaker 2>have a bigger version of that on the headset, right.

0:23:31.840 --> 0:23:33.320
<v Speaker 1>So it's like that. And it's like the headphones. I

0:23:33.359 --> 0:23:36.200
<v Speaker 1>have the big yeah Apple they have that big crown

0:23:36.240 --> 0:23:37.920
<v Speaker 1>on them to adjust volume and stuff.

0:23:38.000 --> 0:23:40.880
<v Speaker 2>Right, So it's like going between VR and AR mode, right,

0:23:40.960 --> 0:23:42.840
<v Speaker 2>and so you are seeing right.

0:23:43.080 --> 0:23:45.320
<v Speaker 1>Oh, you can dial it. You can dial it to

0:23:45.480 --> 0:23:48.320
<v Speaker 1>by degrees in and out. Oh is that the idea?

0:23:48.560 --> 0:23:50.560
<v Speaker 2>I don't know. I was described to me as on

0:23:50.720 --> 0:23:51.119
<v Speaker 2>or off.

0:23:51.280 --> 0:23:53.359
<v Speaker 1>Oh really, okay, because I was thinking like, actually, it's

0:23:53.359 --> 0:23:55.400
<v Speaker 1>a cool idea. If you could go, like I want,

0:23:55.440 --> 0:23:59.280
<v Speaker 1>like sixty percent you know, virtual reality and forty percent

0:23:59.359 --> 0:24:00.800
<v Speaker 1>you know, real or whatever. I don't know.

0:24:00.920 --> 0:24:03.320
<v Speaker 2>Just that that I don't know that actually would make sense.

0:24:03.320 --> 0:24:05.160
<v Speaker 1>I mean, it's a dial it's just my thought. Yeah,

0:24:05.200 --> 0:24:06.040
<v Speaker 1>well that too.

0:24:06.119 --> 0:24:09.320
<v Speaker 2>But also the idea of XR being a spectrum as

0:24:09.400 --> 0:24:11.560
<v Speaker 2>much VR as you want or as much AR as

0:24:11.600 --> 0:24:13.359
<v Speaker 2>you want, that would make a lot of sense to

0:24:13.400 --> 0:24:16.520
<v Speaker 2>me too. I think most people will probably use it

0:24:16.560 --> 0:24:19.239
<v Speaker 2>in VR mode, but you have the AR mode there too, right.

0:24:19.440 --> 0:24:22.280
<v Speaker 2>I think that it's going to be a really interesting

0:24:22.280 --> 0:24:24.800
<v Speaker 2>differentiator from the competition, like I was using the Quest

0:24:24.880 --> 0:24:26.720
<v Speaker 2>three the other day. There's no dial to go in

0:24:26.800 --> 0:24:29.800
<v Speaker 2>and out of vr AR. It's like a sending.

0:24:30.119 --> 0:24:31.760
<v Speaker 1>I mean, on the Quest you can switch into a

0:24:31.800 --> 0:24:34.440
<v Speaker 1>mode where you're to a pass through mode right as

0:24:35.040 --> 0:24:36.880
<v Speaker 1>flipping a dial on the top of the headset.

0:24:37.160 --> 0:24:39.119
<v Speaker 2>That's going to be something every headset maker is going

0:24:39.200 --> 0:24:40.960
<v Speaker 2>to take, you know, for sure.

0:24:41.359 --> 0:24:43.040
<v Speaker 1>And it would have to I mean presumably would have

0:24:43.040 --> 0:24:44.720
<v Speaker 1>to be able like if they imagine people at a

0:24:44.720 --> 0:24:47.520
<v Speaker 1>party with this, then the view it gives you has

0:24:47.600 --> 0:24:49.840
<v Speaker 1>to be as like close to one to one of

0:24:49.880 --> 0:24:52.399
<v Speaker 1>your vision as like you have when you're not wearing

0:24:52.400 --> 0:24:54.600
<v Speaker 1>the headset, right, because like otherwise you're going to be

0:24:54.600 --> 0:24:57.440
<v Speaker 1>bumping into shit and like you know, falling on things.

0:24:57.440 --> 0:24:59.399
<v Speaker 1>Because like you need to be able to see, like

0:24:59.520 --> 0:25:02.320
<v Speaker 1>imagine walking around and you don't have like perfect vision,

0:25:02.480 --> 0:25:04.280
<v Speaker 1>like you can't see the law or whatever.

0:25:04.440 --> 0:25:06.119
<v Speaker 2>Put it this way, I used the Quest three. This

0:25:06.200 --> 0:25:07.679
<v Speaker 2>was a prototype. By the way, this thing's not being

0:25:07.680 --> 0:25:11.639
<v Speaker 2>announced for several months. I used the Quest three and

0:25:11.720 --> 0:25:15.920
<v Speaker 2>it was pretty on point in terms of what you're describing,

0:25:15.960 --> 0:25:17.960
<v Speaker 2>being able to walk and see what you're doing.

0:25:18.840 --> 0:25:22.720
<v Speaker 1>That has two cameras, okay, right, this has a dozen.

0:25:22.760 --> 0:25:25.160
<v Speaker 2>Roughly a dozen, so I would say anywhere between ten

0:25:25.200 --> 0:25:28.080
<v Speaker 2>to fourteen, right, And so you're talking about three to

0:25:28.160 --> 0:25:31.640
<v Speaker 2>five x performance of something that, to me, someone who

0:25:31.720 --> 0:25:34.760
<v Speaker 2>uses this stuff was pretty damn good, right, and talking

0:25:34.760 --> 0:25:37.080
<v Speaker 2>about the metaproduct, and so this is going to be

0:25:37.240 --> 0:25:39.399
<v Speaker 2>this is going to be unbelievable. People who have demoed

0:25:39.400 --> 0:25:42.080
<v Speaker 2>this thing like is rocked off their socks. I mean,

0:25:42.080 --> 0:25:43.160
<v Speaker 2>they've been blown away.

0:25:43.440 --> 0:25:45.320
<v Speaker 1>See here's the thing. It's like, I believe that Apple

0:25:45.359 --> 0:25:47.720
<v Speaker 1>can execute on something like this better than anybody. Like

0:25:47.720 --> 0:25:50.560
<v Speaker 1>that's what I was saying earlier, like the thing that

0:25:50.720 --> 0:25:52.440
<v Speaker 1>just breaks my brain. I don't mean to keep coming

0:25:52.440 --> 0:25:53.760
<v Speaker 1>back to it, but it's just like I just like,

0:25:53.800 --> 0:25:56.960
<v Speaker 1>I'm like, even in the best executed sense, there's so

0:25:57.080 --> 0:26:00.840
<v Speaker 1>many things that are off putting about this. And again

0:26:00.880 --> 0:26:03.439
<v Speaker 1>I say this as a person who desires to be

0:26:03.480 --> 0:26:05.600
<v Speaker 1>able to have these experiences, like I think this is

0:26:05.600 --> 0:26:08.480
<v Speaker 1>a cool technology that we haven't yet seen the end of.

0:26:08.560 --> 0:26:13.520
<v Speaker 1>But I personally have gotten a little bit deflated in

0:26:13.600 --> 0:26:17.120
<v Speaker 1>terms of like what it can provide, not just because

0:26:17.280 --> 0:26:19.520
<v Speaker 1>the experience has been bad or not as good as

0:26:19.560 --> 0:26:24.840
<v Speaker 1>I would hope, but because societally, like culturally, I feel

0:26:24.880 --> 0:26:30.400
<v Speaker 1>like we are all feeling really burnt on being inside

0:26:30.440 --> 0:26:33.800
<v Speaker 1>the box, right, being inside this thing here that we're

0:26:33.840 --> 0:26:36.560
<v Speaker 1>talking on and looking at this thing all day long, right,

0:26:36.680 --> 0:26:39.240
<v Speaker 1>being immersed has become a thing that I think for

0:26:39.280 --> 0:26:41.920
<v Speaker 1>a lot of people. I mean, listen, you're much younger

0:26:41.960 --> 0:26:44.120
<v Speaker 1>than me. I'm an old man now, I'll be dead

0:26:44.119 --> 0:26:46.600
<v Speaker 1>at any day now. But you know, like having lived

0:26:46.600 --> 0:26:48.800
<v Speaker 1>through the boom of this stuff of like the social

0:26:48.840 --> 0:26:52.280
<v Speaker 1>media era and the phone era, I'm like, yeah, like

0:26:52.320 --> 0:26:56.640
<v Speaker 1>I kind of want less of it. And Apple is saying, okay,

0:26:56.800 --> 0:26:59.800
<v Speaker 1>but what if you put your entire fucking face inside

0:26:59.840 --> 0:27:02.440
<v Speaker 1>of it all the time? Right? That's kind of like their

0:27:02.480 --> 0:27:04.520
<v Speaker 1>bat here, which seems weird to me.

0:27:05.200 --> 0:27:07.880
<v Speaker 2>It's scary, it's scary. I mean, they do make these

0:27:07.880 --> 0:27:09.720
<v Speaker 2>comments about like you said, they want you to lose it,

0:27:09.840 --> 0:27:12.400
<v Speaker 2>use your devices less. They don't want you using these things.

0:27:12.440 --> 0:27:13.680
<v Speaker 2>They don't want you to be addicted to them. But

0:27:13.680 --> 0:27:15.280
<v Speaker 2>if people weren't addicted to them and using them as

0:27:15.320 --> 0:27:17.240
<v Speaker 2>much as they did, they wouldn't be making they wouldn't

0:27:17.240 --> 0:27:19.240
<v Speaker 2>be a three trillion dollar company, right, So there is

0:27:19.280 --> 0:27:22.320
<v Speaker 2>some nuance there, right, They want to toe that line.

0:27:22.760 --> 0:27:25.359
<v Speaker 2>You know, what I heard from a few people is

0:27:25.400 --> 0:27:27.560
<v Speaker 2>that at the get go of this project, you know,

0:27:27.840 --> 0:27:32.000
<v Speaker 2>Apple had serious reservations and considerations internally about creating a

0:27:32.000 --> 0:27:34.639
<v Speaker 2>product that would run counter to this idea we're talking about.

0:27:34.720 --> 0:27:35.040
<v Speaker 1>Right.

0:27:35.080 --> 0:27:37.840
<v Speaker 2>They didn't want to create something that would keep people

0:27:37.840 --> 0:27:40.879
<v Speaker 2>out of the real world. And one idea that they

0:27:40.880 --> 0:27:42.879
<v Speaker 2>came up with internally was this argument that if we

0:27:42.920 --> 0:27:45.800
<v Speaker 2>don't do it and do it in a responsible way,

0:27:46.119 --> 0:27:49.360
<v Speaker 2>this external display, the mixed reality focus, someone else will

0:27:49.400 --> 0:27:53.040
<v Speaker 2>do it poorly and you know, hurt society. Now, right,

0:27:53.320 --> 0:27:58.320
<v Speaker 2>that's that opinion. It's a preventative measure, right Yeah, No, yeah,

0:27:58.760 --> 0:28:01.320
<v Speaker 2>buy it at Walgreens. No, But that's one end of

0:28:01.320 --> 0:28:03.879
<v Speaker 2>the spectrum. The other idea here is if Apple doesn't

0:28:03.920 --> 0:28:07.200
<v Speaker 2>do this, Amazon, Meta, Google, someone else will come with

0:28:07.280 --> 0:28:10.159
<v Speaker 2>a VR headset and destroy Apple in that market. Like

0:28:10.200 --> 0:28:14.400
<v Speaker 2>Apple was hurting smart speakers and voice assistants and such, right.

0:28:14.359 --> 0:28:16.080
<v Speaker 1>The speaker thing I was thinking of when you were

0:28:16.080 --> 0:28:18.080
<v Speaker 1>saying how they stick with stuff long term, Like.

0:28:18.520 --> 0:28:20.320
<v Speaker 2>They just continued that after a year.

0:28:20.680 --> 0:28:23.800
<v Speaker 1>Right. There are places where Apple tries to fight and

0:28:24.600 --> 0:28:28.639
<v Speaker 1>doesn't ever really gain a footholder. Just for for whatever reason,

0:28:28.680 --> 0:28:33.760
<v Speaker 1>they can't get the fit right, Like there's something about

0:28:34.400 --> 0:28:36.840
<v Speaker 1>the market doesn't want their version of it. It's too

0:28:36.880 --> 0:28:38.440
<v Speaker 1>you know, so it's like, well, I just.

0:28:38.360 --> 0:28:40.040
<v Speaker 2>They totally screwed up at the home pod at the

0:28:40.080 --> 0:28:42.160
<v Speaker 2>get go right. And if you think about you know,

0:28:42.600 --> 0:28:44.520
<v Speaker 2>it depends how you look at these things. If you

0:28:44.560 --> 0:28:47.360
<v Speaker 2>consider the home pod a major product category, that could

0:28:47.400 --> 0:28:50.000
<v Speaker 2>have been in the same vein as you know, the iPhone,

0:28:50.080 --> 0:28:53.080
<v Speaker 2>the iPod, right, the iPad, the mac right, I consider

0:28:53.120 --> 0:28:56.720
<v Speaker 2>it more in the accessories category, something akin to like

0:28:56.720 --> 0:28:58.640
<v Speaker 2>an Apple TV or air pods.

0:28:58.760 --> 0:29:00.000
<v Speaker 1>It's smaller, it's smaller.

0:29:00.320 --> 0:29:02.920
<v Speaker 2>They okay, that was a five six year development process.

0:29:02.960 --> 0:29:05.840
<v Speaker 2>Also because there were numerous times where they were thinking,

0:29:05.880 --> 0:29:08.040
<v Speaker 2>let's not do it, let's do it. They had many delays.

0:29:08.200 --> 0:29:12.000
<v Speaker 2>They screwed up twofold pricing, three point fifty out the door,

0:29:12.680 --> 0:29:19.800
<v Speaker 2>awful decision, right yep iPhone exclusive serie exclusive, no app integration,

0:29:20.920 --> 0:29:22.920
<v Speaker 2>no ecosystem. I mean that was just.

0:29:23.040 --> 0:29:26.360
<v Speaker 1>Are you describing describing the headset right now? Well, high

0:29:26.360 --> 0:29:27.240
<v Speaker 1>price point out.

0:29:27.120 --> 0:29:28.760
<v Speaker 2>Of the gates, high price point out of the gate.

0:29:28.800 --> 0:29:30.920
<v Speaker 1>It's definitely not going to work with anybody else's device, right,

0:29:30.960 --> 0:29:32.520
<v Speaker 1>You're not going to able to use an Android phone.

0:29:32.520 --> 0:29:34.560
<v Speaker 2>With this, it's not going to work with anyone else's device,

0:29:35.200 --> 0:29:37.320
<v Speaker 2>but it is going to run a million iPad apps

0:29:37.320 --> 0:29:38.840
<v Speaker 2>when you take it out of the box, and so

0:29:39.680 --> 0:29:41.600
<v Speaker 2>they are not going to have a content issue, and

0:29:41.640 --> 0:29:44.200
<v Speaker 2>from day one they're going to have the biggest XR

0:29:44.880 --> 0:29:47.040
<v Speaker 2>app ecosystem of any provider.

0:29:47.800 --> 0:29:49.200
<v Speaker 1>I got to tell you, I mean, I'm just I

0:29:49.280 --> 0:29:51.120
<v Speaker 1>was thinking through this. Like you mentioned that they were

0:29:51.120 --> 0:29:54.520
<v Speaker 1>talking about doing logic. It's a studio app. It is

0:29:54.560 --> 0:29:58.040
<v Speaker 1>something that people use in professional studios to produce music.

0:29:58.040 --> 0:30:00.280
<v Speaker 1>Probably most of the music you listen to, either pro

0:30:00.360 --> 0:30:03.280
<v Speaker 1>Tools or Logic is where they people produce it. So

0:30:03.480 --> 0:30:05.520
<v Speaker 1>you're saying they just brought it to the iPad. You're saying,

0:30:05.560 --> 0:30:07.880
<v Speaker 1>now they can take that and expand it to XR

0:30:08.560 --> 0:30:11.200
<v Speaker 1>and create. Presumably you're in the headset and you can

0:30:11.240 --> 0:30:13.320
<v Speaker 1>see your score. You can see what you're working on

0:30:13.400 --> 0:30:15.760
<v Speaker 1>from like the beginning of a ten minute song to

0:30:15.800 --> 0:30:17.440
<v Speaker 1>the end of it in one glance.

0:30:17.560 --> 0:30:20.160
<v Speaker 2>Right, all right, let me take a step back. First,

0:30:20.200 --> 0:30:25.400
<v Speaker 2>iPad launched Okay, two options for apps, full scale iPad apps,

0:30:26.000 --> 0:30:28.320
<v Speaker 2>iPhone app to x moon't run on the iPad, right,

0:30:28.760 --> 0:30:31.280
<v Speaker 2>and the iPhone only apps died pretty quickly because they

0:30:31.280 --> 0:30:31.920
<v Speaker 2>were crappy.

0:30:32.040 --> 0:30:33.080
<v Speaker 1>I don't like where this is going.

0:30:33.600 --> 0:30:35.600
<v Speaker 2>It was a thing, right, and so this is going

0:30:35.640 --> 0:30:38.360
<v Speaker 2>to be a much better version of that. It'll run

0:30:38.360 --> 0:30:40.040
<v Speaker 2>your iPad os apps out of the box.

0:30:40.280 --> 0:30:42.680
<v Speaker 1>But you're saying like it'll run up. You're saying it'll

0:30:42.760 --> 0:30:46.080
<v Speaker 1>run a window. It'll run a window, right, and then

0:30:47.160 --> 0:30:48.200
<v Speaker 1>that's interesting.

0:30:47.880 --> 0:30:50.320
<v Speaker 2>Right, But if the developer wants to create a native,

0:30:50.400 --> 0:30:54.440
<v Speaker 2>native XR version of that app, they can do that also.

0:30:54.560 --> 0:30:57.800
<v Speaker 1>Right, right, So it's like an operating system literally in

0:30:57.840 --> 0:31:00.719
<v Speaker 1>the sense that I will be able to open and

0:31:00.800 --> 0:31:04.840
<v Speaker 1>look at like multiple iPad apps running as I would

0:31:04.840 --> 0:31:06.640
<v Speaker 1>see them, or some variation of how I would see

0:31:06.640 --> 0:31:10.920
<v Speaker 1>them on an iPad, like a in a windowed scenario essentially,

0:31:10.960 --> 0:31:13.800
<v Speaker 1>but then possibly like at a later day. Okay, so

0:31:13.800 --> 0:31:17.720
<v Speaker 1>so I can So that's really interesting. I mean again,

0:31:17.960 --> 0:31:19.360
<v Speaker 1>but here's the thing. What I was going to say

0:31:19.440 --> 0:31:22.400
<v Speaker 1>is last night I was in my living room. I

0:31:22.440 --> 0:31:24.560
<v Speaker 1>was messing around with logic. I had my headphones on

0:31:24.680 --> 0:31:26.640
<v Speaker 1>and I had noise cancelation on, right, so I couldn't

0:31:26.640 --> 0:31:29.880
<v Speaker 1>hear anything, that's just hearing. And my wife walked in

0:31:30.000 --> 0:31:33.120
<v Speaker 1>the living room and I literally jumped because I didn't

0:31:33.120 --> 0:31:35.080
<v Speaker 1>know she was there and I looked up and there

0:31:35.080 --> 0:31:37.040
<v Speaker 1>was like a person standing there, and I fucking jumped,

0:31:37.280 --> 0:31:38.600
<v Speaker 1>you know. And then I was like, Okay, well, I

0:31:38.640 --> 0:31:41.760
<v Speaker 1>can't sit in the room with her listening to my

0:31:41.960 --> 0:31:44.560
<v Speaker 1>like logic project I'm working on while she's like trying

0:31:44.560 --> 0:31:47.200
<v Speaker 1>to talk to me or we're like, you know, you know, going, hey,

0:31:47.240 --> 0:31:49.360
<v Speaker 1>we should watch a show or something. Like. You can't

0:31:49.360 --> 0:31:52.240
<v Speaker 1>be in a room with noise cancelation unless you expressly

0:31:52.280 --> 0:31:54.840
<v Speaker 1>want to shut the world out, right, Like, I'm sure

0:31:54.880 --> 0:31:57.760
<v Speaker 1>you've used noise cancelation on your on your AirPods and

0:31:57.800 --> 0:32:00.360
<v Speaker 1>you know what I'm talking about. This is like noise

0:32:00.440 --> 0:32:06.360
<v Speaker 1>cancelation for your fucking eyes, I assume additionally for your ears, right, Like,

0:32:06.400 --> 0:32:09.800
<v Speaker 1>so I'm trying to imagine that same scenario, right, but

0:32:09.840 --> 0:32:11.480
<v Speaker 1>like you're sitting in it. You're sitting in a room,

0:32:11.600 --> 0:32:14.520
<v Speaker 1>you're doing something, You're totally isolated from people in that room.

0:32:14.880 --> 0:32:17.600
<v Speaker 1>It's such a weird vulnerability that I just feel like,

0:32:18.560 --> 0:32:20.960
<v Speaker 1>I don't know, does Apple really think people want that?

0:32:21.240 --> 0:32:24.600
<v Speaker 1>Like do people want that? I guess I don't know.

0:32:24.760 --> 0:32:27.480
<v Speaker 2>I personally, you know, I'm a nerd like you I'll

0:32:27.480 --> 0:32:30.680
<v Speaker 2>be first in line, right, not freaking wait to try it.

0:32:30.720 --> 0:32:32.560
<v Speaker 1>We'll buy it. Don't get me wrong, I'm going to

0:32:32.600 --> 0:32:35.840
<v Speaker 1>buy it and use it because I'm a total like gonna,

0:32:36.080 --> 0:32:38.320
<v Speaker 1>I'm a total freak for this shit. But like, right,

0:32:38.800 --> 0:32:41.000
<v Speaker 1>but I have I have quests, and I have all

0:32:41.040 --> 0:32:43.400
<v Speaker 1>kinds of other stuff, and you know, like it comes

0:32:43.640 --> 0:32:46.520
<v Speaker 1>comes out occasionally, but it's just a very unusual experience.

0:32:46.720 --> 0:32:49.720
<v Speaker 2>That's exactly right. My question is is how long until

0:32:49.760 --> 0:32:51.920
<v Speaker 2>this thing is charging on a daily basis on my

0:32:51.960 --> 0:32:54.760
<v Speaker 2>desk rather than being used? How long until it turns

0:32:54.760 --> 0:32:57.840
<v Speaker 2>into uh, you know, something that just sits there and

0:32:58.040 --> 0:32:58.720
<v Speaker 2>gathers dust.

0:33:09.120 --> 0:33:11.280
<v Speaker 1>Here's an interesting anecdote and I think maybe speaks to

0:33:11.280 --> 0:33:14.080
<v Speaker 1>this question about immersion. Yeah, I started to use my

0:33:14.120 --> 0:33:16.760
<v Speaker 1>iPad more in the evenings when I wasn't working because

0:33:16.800 --> 0:33:19.720
<v Speaker 1>I wanted to have an experience that made me less

0:33:19.840 --> 0:33:25.000
<v Speaker 1>immersed in like the windowed noisiness of a laptop. Right,

0:33:25.040 --> 0:33:27.480
<v Speaker 1>Like on my laptop, I've got like Gmail open, I've

0:33:27.480 --> 0:33:29.400
<v Speaker 1>got Twitter open, I've got all this shit, and everything's

0:33:29.440 --> 0:33:32.200
<v Speaker 1>like pinging, there's all this noise, and on an iPad

0:33:32.240 --> 0:33:35.440
<v Speaker 1>it's like very singular. You're like when I'm working on

0:33:35.520 --> 0:33:37.760
<v Speaker 1>logic on the iPad. You know, I'm in like do

0:33:37.880 --> 0:33:40.280
<v Speaker 1>not Disturb, and it's like everything is gone. There's no

0:33:40.360 --> 0:33:42.800
<v Speaker 1>other windows, there's no little pop ups. It's like very

0:33:43.040 --> 0:33:45.520
<v Speaker 1>and you know, for even for browsing or watching shit

0:33:45.600 --> 0:33:47.840
<v Speaker 1>on YouTube. I do like I'll just go into that

0:33:47.920 --> 0:33:50.320
<v Speaker 1>kind of like singular sort of focused zone. It's like

0:33:50.320 --> 0:33:54.600
<v Speaker 1>a bigger workspace, but it's like less noisy and less

0:33:54.600 --> 0:33:57.160
<v Speaker 1>immersive than being in a computer in the sense you know,

0:33:57.400 --> 0:33:59.080
<v Speaker 1>it will take time. I agree with you, but.

0:33:59.600 --> 0:34:01.400
<v Speaker 2>I'm us it. By the way, I was a big

0:34:01.440 --> 0:34:06.120
<v Speaker 2>iPad user until the m one computer started coming out, Yeah,

0:34:06.200 --> 0:34:10.400
<v Speaker 2>because the Intel machines were so crappy and slow and fans.

0:34:10.440 --> 0:34:12.520
<v Speaker 2>I was like, I need to get anything horrible battery, Yeah,

0:34:12.520 --> 0:34:13.400
<v Speaker 2>I need to use the iPad.

0:34:13.520 --> 0:34:13.719
<v Speaker 1>Yeah.

0:34:13.760 --> 0:34:17.440
<v Speaker 2>But since I've had this m one Max MacBook Pro,

0:34:17.640 --> 0:34:19.880
<v Speaker 2>the iPad is not as useful because I actually can

0:34:19.920 --> 0:34:21.160
<v Speaker 2>get stuff done on this now.

0:34:21.640 --> 0:34:23.640
<v Speaker 1>So but I want to talk about that. Actually, like

0:34:23.680 --> 0:34:25.600
<v Speaker 1>this brings us to an interesting point about all of this,

0:34:25.680 --> 0:34:28.399
<v Speaker 1>which is like we are very much in the Tim

0:34:28.480 --> 0:34:30.440
<v Speaker 1>Cook era here. I mean, there's no question that.

0:34:30.719 --> 0:34:32.439
<v Speaker 2>We're deep in the Tim Cook era.

0:34:32.680 --> 0:34:35.880
<v Speaker 1>He's not gonna be CEO forever. Obviously he's not that old,

0:34:35.920 --> 0:34:37.680
<v Speaker 1>but you know there's going to be a CEO after

0:34:37.760 --> 0:34:40.759
<v Speaker 1>Tim Cook. This could be his big like moment, right.

0:34:40.840 --> 0:34:43.960
<v Speaker 1>The era of Tim Cook produced this product, But the

0:34:43.960 --> 0:34:47.360
<v Speaker 1>era of Tim Cook has produced a lot of middling

0:34:48.440 --> 0:34:53.640
<v Speaker 1>just okay, not that exciting me too, products that feel like,

0:34:53.840 --> 0:34:56.960
<v Speaker 1>you know, like like Apple music is It's fine. You know,

0:34:57.000 --> 0:35:00.560
<v Speaker 1>it didn't change the world. It didn't destroy Spot, it

0:35:00.600 --> 0:35:03.680
<v Speaker 1>didn't you know, it's didn't iTunes the situation, right, It

0:35:03.719 --> 0:35:06.360
<v Speaker 1>wasn't like one day we're all got our rios and

0:35:06.400 --> 0:35:09.400
<v Speaker 1>then the next day nobody is using anything but iTunes.

0:35:10.400 --> 0:35:13.160
<v Speaker 1>The lack of definition of this feels very of a

0:35:13.239 --> 0:35:15.520
<v Speaker 1>type of Tim Cook sort of product. Not to say

0:35:15.520 --> 0:35:17.520
<v Speaker 1>that that and you mentioned this in your article that

0:35:17.560 --> 0:35:19.840
<v Speaker 1>he's not a product guy. So can you talk a

0:35:19.880 --> 0:35:21.680
<v Speaker 1>little bit about how this is like a part of

0:35:21.719 --> 0:35:24.520
<v Speaker 1>his legacy if you know what type of legacy he

0:35:24.560 --> 0:35:26.480
<v Speaker 1>would have like in a post Tim Cook era.

0:35:26.680 --> 0:35:30.480
<v Speaker 2>Well, I really think they see this as the third

0:35:30.719 --> 0:35:34.880
<v Speaker 2>major new computing paradigm in Apple's history, right, the first

0:35:34.920 --> 0:35:39.360
<v Speaker 2>one being the Mac, the second one really being the iPhone,

0:35:39.600 --> 0:35:41.960
<v Speaker 2>with the Apple Watch of the iPad as an extension

0:35:42.040 --> 0:35:43.960
<v Speaker 2>of that. Like I would say, you know, the Mac

0:35:44.080 --> 0:35:46.440
<v Speaker 2>is one, the iPhone is two, and the iPad and

0:35:46.520 --> 0:35:49.160
<v Speaker 2>watch are two A and two B, right, And then

0:35:49.160 --> 0:35:52.200
<v Speaker 2>I really think this is number three, right. I think

0:35:52.239 --> 0:35:54.759
<v Speaker 2>they really believe that the future of computing could be

0:35:54.840 --> 0:36:00.000
<v Speaker 2>living in these mixed reality environments. Certainly more immersive, it's

0:36:00.080 --> 0:36:02.520
<v Speaker 2>certainly brings a lot of power with it. There's a

0:36:02.560 --> 0:36:05.000
<v Speaker 2>lot more flexibility in the types of apps you can use,

0:36:05.320 --> 0:36:07.240
<v Speaker 2>there's a lot more ways that you can actually interact

0:36:07.239 --> 0:36:10.960
<v Speaker 2>with your content. But it is so early stage one.

0:36:11.040 --> 0:36:13.280
<v Speaker 2>I mean it really I think could take ten years

0:36:13.600 --> 0:36:16.480
<v Speaker 2>to take off. And I think if they successfully create

0:36:16.560 --> 0:36:19.360
<v Speaker 2>this XR market, because let's be honest, it's really nascent,

0:36:19.440 --> 0:36:22.480
<v Speaker 2>it basically doesn't exist, and they take it into how

0:36:22.520 --> 0:36:26.239
<v Speaker 2>people use computers in the future instead of laptops and desktops, right,

0:36:26.360 --> 0:36:28.719
<v Speaker 2>or instead of iPads and phones, I think that's a

0:36:28.719 --> 0:36:32.920
<v Speaker 2>pretty cool legacy. Right. It's also an extremely big bet

0:36:32.960 --> 0:36:35.880
<v Speaker 2>because there is a very high chance that never happens

0:36:35.920 --> 0:36:39.080
<v Speaker 2>and it doesn't work out. On the other hand, Apple

0:36:39.160 --> 0:36:42.440
<v Speaker 2>has so much market cachet and has so much money

0:36:42.520 --> 0:36:45.879
<v Speaker 2>and so many resources that I think that this thing.

0:36:45.960 --> 0:36:50.720
<v Speaker 2>Becoming a massive, massive failure would not break the company.

0:36:50.760 --> 0:36:54.759
<v Speaker 2>But I think this being a big hit would do

0:36:55.360 --> 0:36:57.160
<v Speaker 2>wonders for the company.

0:36:56.840 --> 0:36:59.520
<v Speaker 1>Like you would change that the path of where they're

0:36:59.600 --> 0:37:02.560
<v Speaker 1>focused like pretty much for the future, right, it.

0:37:02.560 --> 0:37:05.239
<v Speaker 2>Would change a lot. It would change a lot. And

0:37:05.320 --> 0:37:08.400
<v Speaker 2>so I think that is one aspect of it. Another

0:37:08.440 --> 0:37:09.879
<v Speaker 2>part of it that I don't think people are talking

0:37:09.920 --> 0:37:11.759
<v Speaker 2>about enough, and I tried to flick at this through

0:37:11.760 --> 0:37:15.399
<v Speaker 2>my articles in this conversation, is the app situation, right.

0:37:15.520 --> 0:37:18.560
<v Speaker 2>I think the idea is that the Apple user of

0:37:18.600 --> 0:37:21.280
<v Speaker 2>Tim Cook's dream has all of these products, the phone,

0:37:21.320 --> 0:37:25.399
<v Speaker 2>the watch, the iPad, the Mac, et cetera, right right

0:37:25.480 --> 0:37:28.680
<v Speaker 2>at the headset, and you have one app that can

0:37:28.760 --> 0:37:31.520
<v Speaker 2>run across the ecosystem. So whatever Apple device you're on,

0:37:31.800 --> 0:37:34.560
<v Speaker 2>you can run any app you have in a different form.

0:37:34.760 --> 0:37:36.440
<v Speaker 2>You can run logic on your Mac, you can run

0:37:36.440 --> 0:37:38.760
<v Speaker 2>logic on your iPad, you can run logic on your headset,

0:37:38.880 --> 0:37:40.960
<v Speaker 2>you can I message from your watch, from your headset,

0:37:41.000 --> 0:37:43.400
<v Speaker 2>your phone, whatever, and it all just integrates together.

0:37:43.800 --> 0:37:45.960
<v Speaker 1>And that's their biggest that's their biggest asset when you

0:37:46.040 --> 0:37:48.440
<v Speaker 1>get down to it, Like obviously the hardware or the

0:37:48.480 --> 0:37:52.279
<v Speaker 1>software that the acumen, a building, and but like the

0:37:52.320 --> 0:37:55.239
<v Speaker 1>way all of these things work together is ultimately at

0:37:55.239 --> 0:37:59.160
<v Speaker 1>the core of Apples sort of mastery of this industry.

0:37:59.200 --> 0:38:00.200
<v Speaker 1>It's like, but it's a.

0:38:00.080 --> 0:38:03.200
<v Speaker 2>Double edged sword. It's a double edged sword because this

0:38:03.280 --> 0:38:05.080
<v Speaker 2>has been a Timcook thing. I mean, Steve Jobs are

0:38:05.080 --> 0:38:07.120
<v Speaker 2>sort of laying the groundwork for that with iCloud and

0:38:07.160 --> 0:38:09.799
<v Speaker 2>the initial post PC devices as they called it. But

0:38:09.840 --> 0:38:12.360
<v Speaker 2>that's really been a thing, this Timcook era has been pushing.

0:38:12.360 --> 0:38:14.560
<v Speaker 2>I don't mean to credit him specifically, but it has

0:38:14.680 --> 0:38:17.080
<v Speaker 2>been his company the last decade and change, so you know,

0:38:17.120 --> 0:38:20.600
<v Speaker 2>we'll credit leadership to that it has. It's a double

0:38:20.680 --> 0:38:24.920
<v Speaker 2>edged sword because it necessitates Apple doing everything because if

0:38:24.960 --> 0:38:30.280
<v Speaker 2>they miss one potential major consumer technology category, you break

0:38:30.320 --> 0:38:32.839
<v Speaker 2>the ecosystem. The example I like to give is, let's

0:38:32.880 --> 0:38:38.200
<v Speaker 2>say Amazon comes out with an amazing AR headset. Apple

0:38:38.239 --> 0:38:41.200
<v Speaker 2>doesn't have one. Right, everyone wants to buy this Amazon

0:38:41.400 --> 0:38:44.200
<v Speaker 2>ar headset. Then they get exposed to other Amazon products,

0:38:44.200 --> 0:38:46.839
<v Speaker 2>whether it's the Amazon tablets, the Amazon phone, if they

0:38:46.880 --> 0:38:48.360
<v Speaker 2>bring that back to the e buds.

0:38:48.160 --> 0:38:51.960
<v Speaker 1>Right, Right, it's all about ecosystem sort of dominates.

0:38:52.040 --> 0:38:52.160
<v Speaker 2>Right.

0:38:52.200 --> 0:38:54.239
<v Speaker 1>It's like, you don't just want one product, you want

0:38:54.239 --> 0:38:55.640
<v Speaker 1>to be inside of the entire thing.

0:38:56.000 --> 0:38:59.000
<v Speaker 2>So the reliance by Apple on this idea where you're

0:38:59.040 --> 0:39:02.839
<v Speaker 2>owning the whole ecosystem, if they miss one element of it, right,

0:39:03.000 --> 0:39:05.480
<v Speaker 2>even though the HomePod was a complete failure, that's why

0:39:05.480 --> 0:39:07.879
<v Speaker 2>they had to do a HomePod and try a HomePod right, right.

0:39:07.920 --> 0:39:10.000
<v Speaker 2>And so their bet is if the technology industry is

0:39:10.000 --> 0:39:12.160
<v Speaker 2>going to push into headsets, they have to have one too,

0:39:12.200 --> 0:39:14.400
<v Speaker 2>because if they miss on that, yeah, one crack in

0:39:14.400 --> 0:39:18.080
<v Speaker 2>the ecosystem could cost them big time across their other products.

0:39:18.440 --> 0:39:21.560
<v Speaker 1>But you see, you actually just raised an interesting point

0:39:21.560 --> 0:39:23.520
<v Speaker 1>that I meant to bring up earlier and I wanted

0:39:23.520 --> 0:39:26.920
<v Speaker 1>to talk about before we ended. This is what's so interesting,

0:39:27.000 --> 0:39:29.479
<v Speaker 1>Like you're talking about the ecosystem, you're talking about Apple

0:39:29.600 --> 0:39:31.680
<v Speaker 1>missing things. And I think that like one of the

0:39:32.080 --> 0:39:35.839
<v Speaker 1>blind spots Apple has had in some ways historically has

0:39:35.880 --> 0:39:39.040
<v Speaker 1>been things like the Internet and search and these like

0:39:39.239 --> 0:39:43.040
<v Speaker 1>large sort of like online projects that like look at

0:39:43.080 --> 0:39:45.719
<v Speaker 1>maps for instance, right, Like they've they've been playing for

0:39:45.840 --> 0:39:48.120
<v Speaker 1>years playing catch up to Google in all of these

0:39:48.239 --> 0:39:50.320
<v Speaker 1>areas of just like they're like, hey, we just didn't

0:39:50.320 --> 0:39:52.560
<v Speaker 1>see this, we didn't put any money into it. My

0:39:52.640 --> 0:39:54.959
<v Speaker 1>understanding wasn't I feel like this has been said before.

0:39:54.960 --> 0:39:57.920
<v Speaker 1>Steve Jobs actually didn't like the Internet. He wasn't like

0:39:57.960 --> 0:39:59.719
<v Speaker 1>a fan of being online, and like so a lot

0:39:59.760 --> 0:40:02.160
<v Speaker 1>of us were kind of built with like not online

0:40:02.160 --> 0:40:04.960
<v Speaker 1>as a component. But I'm looking now at the landscape,

0:40:04.960 --> 0:40:08.239
<v Speaker 1>and I'm looking at what is the emergent moment that

0:40:08.480 --> 0:40:11.239
<v Speaker 1>is happening. And listen, we're not done with any of

0:40:11.280 --> 0:40:13.160
<v Speaker 1>this stuff yet. We're at the very early endings of

0:40:13.160 --> 0:40:15.120
<v Speaker 1>a lot of this technology that we're starting to see.

0:40:15.360 --> 0:40:17.200
<v Speaker 1>But if you look at what's happening with AI right now,

0:40:17.239 --> 0:40:20.080
<v Speaker 1>for instance, right in these large models, you know whether

0:40:20.120 --> 0:40:23.920
<v Speaker 1>it's mid journey or open AI. Obviously you see Microsoft,

0:40:23.960 --> 0:40:27.080
<v Speaker 1>you see Google now suddenly getting into this like huge

0:40:27.200 --> 0:40:33.640
<v Speaker 1>race for dominance in computing that goes beyond the known

0:40:33.800 --> 0:40:36.000
<v Speaker 1>space that I think we've been in right a type

0:40:36.000 --> 0:40:40.280
<v Speaker 1>of computing that is about us interacting with the machine

0:40:40.280 --> 0:40:43.880
<v Speaker 1>in a way that is naturalistic and responsive, beyond anything

0:40:43.920 --> 0:40:46.239
<v Speaker 1>I think we could have imagined even ten years ago.

0:40:46.840 --> 0:40:49.160
<v Speaker 1>And by the way, Siri is a good example of

0:40:49.200 --> 0:40:52.359
<v Speaker 1>where Apple tried to get into this like assistant game.

0:40:52.400 --> 0:40:55.640
<v Speaker 1>They obviously have a huge foothold there, but everybody knows

0:40:56.360 --> 0:40:59.120
<v Speaker 1>that Siri is worse at everything than many of the

0:40:59.160 --> 0:41:03.600
<v Speaker 1>other assistants, notably Google's assistant right, And so to me,

0:41:03.840 --> 0:41:08.319
<v Speaker 1>like a bold, exciting Apple has got it figured out

0:41:08.320 --> 0:41:10.680
<v Speaker 1>for the future or has sees a pathway forward would

0:41:10.719 --> 0:41:15.160
<v Speaker 1>be something like Apple announces it has acquired open ai, right,

0:41:15.440 --> 0:41:18.200
<v Speaker 1>or Apple has built an AI that is far more

0:41:18.239 --> 0:41:22.080
<v Speaker 1>sophisticated but also focused on privacy and respecting copyright and

0:41:22.080 --> 0:41:24.520
<v Speaker 1>all this other stuff that people are worried about. And

0:41:24.600 --> 0:41:26.720
<v Speaker 1>yet what I see is, this is what's so odd

0:41:26.719 --> 0:41:29.920
<v Speaker 1>to me about this this headset, is that it feels

0:41:29.920 --> 0:41:33.080
<v Speaker 1>like the industry and the Internet and its users are

0:41:33.080 --> 0:41:36.160
<v Speaker 1>going in one direction over here to a different new

0:41:36.239 --> 0:41:38.480
<v Speaker 1>thing that is it's not and I don't think it's

0:41:38.600 --> 0:41:40.640
<v Speaker 1>just hype. I think part of it is like there's

0:41:40.640 --> 0:41:42.600
<v Speaker 1>something underpinning that that's very real.

0:41:42.520 --> 0:41:42.880
<v Speaker 2>I agree.

0:41:42.920 --> 0:41:46.560
<v Speaker 1>Whereas Apple's over here going into this again almost this

0:41:46.680 --> 0:41:52.880
<v Speaker 1>like internal inside the box, not really about outside, not

0:41:52.920 --> 0:41:55.480
<v Speaker 1>really about the Internet, not in some ways even about

0:41:56.520 --> 0:41:58.320
<v Speaker 1>being able to be social. And it just feels like

0:41:58.360 --> 0:42:00.759
<v Speaker 1>these two really divergent paths, and I I I just wonder,

0:42:00.880 --> 0:42:02.839
<v Speaker 1>like does that fit anywhere into this, like the AI

0:42:02.880 --> 0:42:06.720
<v Speaker 1>stuff that's happening and is there any from your sense

0:42:06.960 --> 0:42:08.759
<v Speaker 1>anywhere at Apple or that's starting to be like a

0:42:08.800 --> 0:42:11.799
<v Speaker 1>conversation because it feels like they're missing something right now right.

0:42:12.239 --> 0:42:15.200
<v Speaker 2>I've seen a few people point this out where the

0:42:15.280 --> 0:42:18.839
<v Speaker 2>industry is heading into AI and Apple is a week

0:42:18.840 --> 0:42:22.120
<v Speaker 2>away from heading into XR. Right, two diverging paths, and

0:42:22.160 --> 0:42:25.040
<v Speaker 2>that's certainly true. The way I look at it sort

0:42:25.080 --> 0:42:27.040
<v Speaker 2>of off the cuff here because I haven't given it

0:42:27.280 --> 0:42:32.680
<v Speaker 2>much thought. The XR situation is a platform. AI is

0:42:33.840 --> 0:42:37.919
<v Speaker 2>in my opinion, more feature than platform, and I think

0:42:37.960 --> 0:42:42.040
<v Speaker 2>AI is something that they play very heavily on XR,

0:42:42.480 --> 0:42:44.719
<v Speaker 2>So I don't think it's two different paths. I think

0:42:44.760 --> 0:42:47.239
<v Speaker 2>the two can go together. On the top of my head,

0:42:47.280 --> 0:42:49.280
<v Speaker 2>I can't come up with the most interesting use cases

0:42:49.320 --> 0:42:52.480
<v Speaker 2>for AI in XR, but certainly Apple needs to get

0:42:52.480 --> 0:42:56.000
<v Speaker 2>the ball rolling. I think these chat bots that you see,

0:42:56.280 --> 0:42:58.680
<v Speaker 2>like the chat GPT stuff, Yeah, this is weird, but

0:42:58.719 --> 0:43:00.759
<v Speaker 2>I call it like raw AI. It's like a raw

0:43:00.800 --> 0:43:04.359
<v Speaker 2>implementation of what artificial intelligence can do. And I think

0:43:04.400 --> 0:43:07.799
<v Speaker 2>what Apple does is they take these raw technologies and

0:43:07.840 --> 0:43:09.440
<v Speaker 2>they apply them.

0:43:09.640 --> 0:43:09.839
<v Speaker 1>Right.

0:43:09.960 --> 0:43:12.799
<v Speaker 2>It's like if you look up the definition of technology

0:43:13.080 --> 0:43:17.960
<v Speaker 2>right in Mirriam Webster. I believe the definition is applied sciences, right.

0:43:18.560 --> 0:43:23.160
<v Speaker 2>I think chat GPT's science. I think technology is applied science.

0:43:23.560 --> 0:43:27.800
<v Speaker 2>And I think the ultimate way of showing AI's power

0:43:27.920 --> 0:43:30.560
<v Speaker 2>is applying that. And so if Apple is able to

0:43:30.600 --> 0:43:34.240
<v Speaker 2>take AI and apply it to real world use cases, right,

0:43:34.320 --> 0:43:36.719
<v Speaker 2>to make things easier, to make things better, I think

0:43:36.719 --> 0:43:40.000
<v Speaker 2>that's where AI can really shine. I think Microsoft, from

0:43:40.040 --> 0:43:42.120
<v Speaker 2>the little I've seen so far of what they've shown,

0:43:42.200 --> 0:43:44.600
<v Speaker 2>these things like Copilot, these things that can assist you

0:43:44.640 --> 0:43:46.920
<v Speaker 2>in day to day development of things, I think that's

0:43:46.960 --> 0:43:48.920
<v Speaker 2>where AI can really shine. So I think Microsoft is

0:43:48.960 --> 0:43:51.920
<v Speaker 2>doing a great job. THEAI stuff you're starting to see

0:43:51.920 --> 0:43:54.640
<v Speaker 2>in Google Search and bar and being and such. I

0:43:54.640 --> 0:43:56.880
<v Speaker 2>think that's happening there. I think we're a couple of

0:43:56.920 --> 0:43:59.600
<v Speaker 2>years away from Apple really showing some big news in AI.

0:43:59.680 --> 0:44:02.919
<v Speaker 2>I'm not anticipating rights they had a five year lead,

0:44:02.960 --> 0:44:04.640
<v Speaker 2>another five years behind, right, and so.

0:44:05.000 --> 0:44:06.719
<v Speaker 1>Well, that's the thing is like they feels like they're

0:44:06.719 --> 0:44:08.719
<v Speaker 1>always playing ketchup in these areas that actually end up

0:44:08.760 --> 0:44:12.560
<v Speaker 1>to be huge, huge, like massively important moments in computing.

0:44:12.600 --> 0:44:15.200
<v Speaker 1>It's not to say, look, Apple's like the most valuable

0:44:15.239 --> 0:44:17.279
<v Speaker 1>company in the world, right, like you can't knock. You

0:44:17.280 --> 0:44:19.200
<v Speaker 1>can't be like, well they're bad at business or something.

0:44:19.200 --> 0:44:19.640
<v Speaker 1>That's not it.

0:44:19.680 --> 0:44:20.520
<v Speaker 2>They're doing something right.

0:44:20.520 --> 0:44:22.319
<v Speaker 1>They're doing something right, So like you have to be

0:44:22.320 --> 0:44:24.560
<v Speaker 1>inclined to go like, well, maybe they've got a good

0:44:24.600 --> 0:44:26.880
<v Speaker 1>idea with the headset, but yeah, it just feels like

0:44:26.920 --> 0:44:30.000
<v Speaker 1>it's interesting because because when I was reading your writing

0:44:30.080 --> 0:44:31.719
<v Speaker 1>on this, and there's so much of it that's so

0:44:31.719 --> 0:44:34.000
<v Speaker 1>good and I encourage everybody listen to go and read it,

0:44:34.800 --> 0:44:38.520
<v Speaker 1>but like it just feels like a weird almost an artifact.

0:44:38.640 --> 0:44:42.279
<v Speaker 1>And so I guess their challenge here will be can

0:44:42.320 --> 0:44:46.120
<v Speaker 1>they make something that feels like yesterday's sort of tech

0:44:46.239 --> 0:44:50.480
<v Speaker 1>or yesterday's future feel like tomorrow's You know.

0:44:51.040 --> 0:44:54.480
<v Speaker 2>I think yes, because that future never took off, right,

0:44:54.520 --> 0:44:56.080
<v Speaker 2>I mean I think they really believe that it never

0:44:56.160 --> 0:44:58.439
<v Speaker 2>took off, And you know, based on the tech that's

0:44:58.480 --> 0:45:00.359
<v Speaker 2>going to be in there, I really think it's going

0:45:00.400 --> 0:45:03.680
<v Speaker 2>to blow the water off of anything. I mean, it's

0:45:03.719 --> 0:45:08.120
<v Speaker 2>it's extremely powerful, extremely advanced device. The bigger question to

0:45:08.120 --> 0:45:10.120
<v Speaker 2>me is do people really want that and are people

0:45:10.200 --> 0:45:12.080
<v Speaker 2>going to be sold on that? And I think that's

0:45:12.160 --> 0:45:14.880
<v Speaker 2>something that's going to take time. I certainly could be

0:45:14.880 --> 0:45:17.040
<v Speaker 2>sold on it. But you know I haven't used it, right,

0:45:17.080 --> 0:45:18.839
<v Speaker 2>I haven't played with these things for an extended period

0:45:18.880 --> 0:45:19.160
<v Speaker 2>of time.

0:45:19.280 --> 0:45:21.520
<v Speaker 1>So you claim right, So I claim you claim. Mark.

0:45:21.719 --> 0:45:23.560
<v Speaker 2>We're actually talking to you from one right now and

0:45:23.600 --> 0:45:25.719
<v Speaker 2>it has this in feat right there.

0:45:25.920 --> 0:45:27.400
<v Speaker 1>That's that's fucking amazing.

0:45:27.880 --> 0:45:29.120
<v Speaker 2>I mean, how cool would it be if we were

0:45:29.160 --> 0:45:30.920
<v Speaker 2>doing this in virtual reality where it felt like we

0:45:30.920 --> 0:45:32.600
<v Speaker 2>were in the same living room together, right?

0:45:32.640 --> 0:45:34.600
<v Speaker 1>Well, would it be cool? That's a question. I think

0:45:34.640 --> 0:45:37.560
<v Speaker 1>that I have done that. I have done podcasts in

0:45:37.640 --> 0:45:41.960
<v Speaker 1>virtual reality and it was but this was like five, six,

0:45:42.080 --> 0:45:44.800
<v Speaker 1>seven years ago. It was like shit, you know, yeah,

0:45:44.840 --> 0:45:46.080
<v Speaker 1>what would it be like? I guess we're going to

0:45:46.120 --> 0:45:48.719
<v Speaker 1>find out in a few days. Mark, listen, I know

0:45:48.719 --> 0:45:50.600
<v Speaker 1>you got to go. Thank you so much for doing this.

0:45:50.719 --> 0:45:51.440
<v Speaker 2>Thanks for having me.

0:45:51.520 --> 0:45:53.840
<v Speaker 1>It's this a brilliant conversation, super interesting. You got to

0:45:53.840 --> 0:45:55.880
<v Speaker 1>come back. We're going to talk more about all of

0:45:55.960 --> 0:45:58.799
<v Speaker 1>the unearthed secrets that you've that you've gotten into because

0:45:58.800 --> 0:46:00.000
<v Speaker 1>it's fascinating stuff.

0:46:00.160 --> 0:46:01.680
<v Speaker 2>Thank you. And if I can just give a shout

0:46:01.680 --> 0:46:04.040
<v Speaker 2>out anyone wants to read more, it's Bloomberg dot com

0:46:04.040 --> 0:46:06.479
<v Speaker 2>slash power on or Twitter dot com slash Mark Erman

0:46:06.840 --> 0:46:08.880
<v Speaker 2>and thanks Josh. It was an honor to bear with

0:46:08.920 --> 0:46:10.239
<v Speaker 2>you and looking forward to next time.

0:46:10.640 --> 0:46:18.920
<v Speaker 1>Thanks for joining. Well that is our show. I mean,

0:46:18.960 --> 0:46:21.880
<v Speaker 1>there are several hundred more hours of conversation I would

0:46:21.920 --> 0:46:24.040
<v Speaker 1>like to have with Mark, but we all have things

0:46:24.080 --> 0:46:28.239
<v Speaker 1>we've got to do. Anyhow, we will be back next

0:46:28.239 --> 0:46:33.280
<v Speaker 1>week with more what future as you know, and as always,

0:46:33.560 --> 0:46:35.800
<v Speaker 1>I wish you and your family the very best