WEBVTT - MLB: Leading Off June 10th, 2022 (Ep. 529) 0:00:00.640 --> 0:00:17.200 McNasty, let's play ball. Welcome in everybody to fantasy Bros. 0:00:17.280 --> 0:00:19.640 This is leading Off, brought to you by Bet MGM, 0:00:19.720 --> 0:00:22.599 the King of sports folks. It's me Joey p Joe 0:00:22.600 --> 0:00:24.680 piece Appia with me is the Welsh, and of course 0:00:24.760 --> 0:00:27.920 it's you Jo. That's right, baby, Let's go. It's a 0:00:27.960 --> 0:00:30.920 baseball fun Friday. We got home run calls, we got 0:00:31.080 --> 0:00:36.919 a losing streak snapped by Shohei Otani single handedly grabbing 0:00:36.960 --> 0:00:39.560 the Angels by the haunches and willing them to victory 0:00:39.680 --> 0:00:42.599 last night, and a new leader in the American League. Say, 0:00:42.680 --> 0:00:46.240 young race, how you doing? Welsh? Welcome to the program, buddy. 0:00:46.280 --> 0:00:48.479 Look at all these pitching performances from last night. 0:00:48.720 --> 0:00:50.479 Look at all the did you say haunches? 0:00:50.600 --> 0:00:53.800 By the way, what a haunch word by the haunches. 0:00:54.280 --> 0:00:57.720 What an absolute word, A plus effort for the haunches. 0:00:57.800 --> 0:01:01.000 He has lots and lots of pitching performers and says, uh, 0:01:01.560 --> 0:01:03.680 point out my guy, Shane McClanahan, what did I say. 0:01:03.880 --> 0:01:05.280 I want to go back and do the math. I 0:01:05.360 --> 0:01:07.800 want to start it fresh. Or somebody in the Peanuts 0:01:07.840 --> 0:01:09.680 and Cracker Jacks wants to help me. I want to 0:01:09.720 --> 0:01:12.640 go back, and I want to track the Shane McClanahan 0:01:12.800 --> 0:01:14.160 caves to how many times. 0:01:13.959 --> 0:01:17.360 He's hit it and do the whole season to you know, 0:01:17.480 --> 0:01:18.240 work through my magic. 0:01:18.360 --> 0:01:21.200 Like I said, would how much money could you make 0:01:21.240 --> 0:01:24.119 from a profit standpoint of taking his case every single 0:01:24.280 --> 0:01:28.360 time the over as he smashed it again and continues 0:01:28.480 --> 0:01:31.520 to dominate. Love me some Shane McClanahan. But we don't 0:01:31.560 --> 0:01:34.319 have to talk only about him and those k props. 0:01:34.959 --> 0:01:38.000 Well, I mean, we could certainly start there, because as 0:01:38.120 --> 0:01:41.360 of this morning, he's now gone ahead of Justin Verlander, 0:01:41.360 --> 0:01:44.720 which I think is still preposterous to tell you, it's 0:01:44.720 --> 0:01:46.720 a huge trap. I think it's the time. If you 0:01:46.800 --> 0:01:49.160 haven't bet Verlander, this is the time to go and 0:01:49.240 --> 0:01:52.320 bet Verlander. I'm telling you right now. Uh, that's that's 0:01:52.360 --> 0:01:55.840 what I would do. That is I look, I'm just telling. 0:01:55.640 --> 0:01:56.800 You what I would look like. 0:01:58.520 --> 0:02:00.080 I will pull them up right now, we're going to 0:02:00.120 --> 0:02:03.960 take a look at them. But I feel like, once again, 0:02:04.320 --> 0:02:08.360 you know you're talking about you're talking about every time 0:02:08.440 --> 0:02:10.840 somebody has a good performance, somebody leapfrogging somebody else. That's 0:02:10.840 --> 0:02:15.400 a very dangerous thing. So although mcclanahan's been great, and 0:02:15.520 --> 0:02:18.360 he has been. I think you know you're looking right 0:02:18.400 --> 0:02:21.000 now justin Verlander is still the consensus leader of plus 0:02:21.040 --> 0:02:24.440 four hundred. Clanahan's plus five hundred on FanDuel. That's changed 0:02:24.440 --> 0:02:27.600 on Fandel he's plus three sixty and Verlander's plus four 0:02:27.600 --> 0:02:29.800 to ten now, which I think is a foolish thing. 0:02:30.120 --> 0:02:32.680 They're really trapping us. But you haven't gotten into Verlander. 0:02:32.800 --> 0:02:34.480 Just watch this market. This is the time to do it, 0:02:34.880 --> 0:02:38.000 because again McLanahan has to be the guy who you know, 0:02:38.200 --> 0:02:41.079 carries over to the second half too. To really prove it. 0:02:41.160 --> 0:02:42.840 The Rays have to continue to be a good team. 0:02:42.880 --> 0:02:45.200 It's something Offensively, they have a lot of problems. So 0:02:45.760 --> 0:02:47.639 I'm not saying mcclanahan's not great. He was one of 0:02:47.639 --> 0:02:49.840 my favorite pitchers coming into the season. He's been awesome. 0:02:50.360 --> 0:02:52.560 But I think this little leap frog that he took 0:02:52.600 --> 0:02:54.160 on the FanDuel side at least, because if we look 0:02:54.160 --> 0:02:57.519 at the consensus line, it's Verlander still ahead, but in 0:02:57.600 --> 0:03:00.239 that one spot it's changed on Fandel, I think that 0:03:00.360 --> 0:03:01.160 was very interesting. 0:03:01.720 --> 0:03:03.640 Yeah, I mean, I don't The one thing I agree 0:03:03.639 --> 0:03:06.040 with you on, especially on this is like, this is 0:03:06.120 --> 0:03:08.919 not the time to bet Shane McClanahan, like, I think 0:03:08.960 --> 0:03:11.359 that's kind of passed, and I am interested in the 0:03:11.480 --> 0:03:14.200 values on these because there's a lot of volatility. There's 0:03:14.200 --> 0:03:16.320 a ton of volatility that could follow a guy like him. 0:03:16.400 --> 0:03:19.400 But you know what, listen, he is the case. This 0:03:19.480 --> 0:03:22.160 is I love this from qualified pictures. If you're just 0:03:22.200 --> 0:03:25.440 looking at overall K percentage, he is the leader. There's 0:03:25.440 --> 0:03:28.519 actually only a five pictures with a thirty percent K percentage. Again, 0:03:28.639 --> 0:03:32.280 of qualified big names, McClanahan is the leader. There is 0:03:32.560 --> 0:03:37.160 no bigger gap than between one and two, where there 0:03:37.240 --> 0:03:40.560 is almost a three percent gap. Shane McClanahan thirty five 0:03:40.600 --> 0:03:43.440 point five percent K percentage thirty two point seven for 0:03:43.560 --> 0:03:47.280 Dylan Cecar's number two. And of those top five, nobody 0:03:47.360 --> 0:03:51.280 has a lower walk percentage than Shane McClanahan at forty 0:03:51.400 --> 0:03:55.080 four point seven, and that gives him the number one 0:03:55.200 --> 0:03:59.040 qualified K minus walk percentage in the league by almost 0:03:59.600 --> 0:04:03.280 five points. Number two is twenty six percent, So you're 0:04:03.320 --> 0:04:06.120 minusing the walk percentage by K percentage of Corbyn Burns 0:04:06.560 --> 0:04:10.040 thirty point eight almost five for Shay McClanahan. 0:04:10.760 --> 0:04:12.040 That boy is good. 0:04:12.720 --> 0:04:16.800 That boy good, he good. That's mine now, no earned 0:04:17.760 --> 0:04:21.920 two hits nine k's for him last night. Other notable 0:04:22.200 --> 0:04:25.559 performances show Tany finally snapping the fourteen game losing streaks, 0:04:25.560 --> 0:04:27.240 so we don't have to talk about the what if 0:04:27.279 --> 0:04:30.200 they break the record kind of stuff. Garrett Cole making 0:04:30.240 --> 0:04:32.280 some history too. Gave up back to back to back 0:04:32.400 --> 0:04:35.599 home runs yesterday. Five home runs and a no decision, 0:04:35.720 --> 0:04:37.880 So a wacky start for Garrett Cole yesterday. 0:04:38.160 --> 0:04:40.119 Can I interject for one second please? 0:04:40.360 --> 0:04:42.240 I did put out one of the reasons the Peanuts 0:04:42.240 --> 0:04:44.200 and cracker Jack should be following me on Twitter at 0:04:44.360 --> 0:04:47.320 is that the Welsh was After the show, I decided 0:04:47.600 --> 0:04:51.000 we needed to take that poll of the songs to 0:04:51.120 --> 0:04:52.920 the streets. We need to take it to the streets, 0:04:53.160 --> 0:04:55.520 and I tweeted out and actually there's still a little 0:04:55.600 --> 0:04:57.640 not that it matters at this point. Time to vote, 0:04:57.920 --> 0:05:01.280 I said, the debate, what should we do? I say 0:05:01.360 --> 0:05:05.440 cartoons songs, Joseph's Taylor Swift songs, and sixty two point 0:05:05.560 --> 0:05:09.000 five percent of people said go with the cartoon TV 0:05:09.120 --> 0:05:09.640 show song. 0:05:09.800 --> 0:05:12.719 So just want to say a bunch of nerdy guys 0:05:12.800 --> 0:05:15.280 want to go with the with the songs from their 0:05:15.400 --> 0:05:18.400 childhood of cartoons. And not the pretty girl. They're just 0:05:18.480 --> 0:05:20.880 intimidated by the thought of walking up to a Taylor 0:05:20.920 --> 0:05:23.320 Swift song. So come on, I mean, I mean, like 0:05:23.400 --> 0:05:23.960 I said. 0:05:23.800 --> 0:05:27.720 It couldn't even one more the focus You couldn't. I 0:05:27.720 --> 0:05:30.800 don't think I could. I think I would recognize them. Oh, 0:05:30.880 --> 0:05:32.360 this is what I could do. I could be like 0:05:33.080 --> 0:05:34.760 a I know that one. I heard that one. That's 0:05:34.760 --> 0:05:36.600 the best I could do with this. I don't think 0:05:36.880 --> 0:05:39.159 off the top of my head, there's not one song 0:05:39.240 --> 0:05:40.599 that comes to mind of Taylor Swift. 0:05:41.600 --> 0:05:43.080 She's prolific, that's all. 0:05:43.160 --> 0:05:45.360 Singing all right, sing it well? 0:05:45.480 --> 0:05:47.560 I mean, so what you want to did you shake 0:05:47.600 --> 0:05:48.760 it off? You want to do playing? Oh? 0:05:48.800 --> 0:05:50.440 Shake it off? Okay, shake it off. I should have 0:05:50.440 --> 0:05:50.680 known that. 0:05:50.760 --> 0:05:52.840 I mean, come on, come on, baby, let's go. And 0:05:52.880 --> 0:05:55.440 I see Chris has now entered our producer because he 0:05:55.520 --> 0:05:58.480 didn't put the home run board in. I talked to Ethan. 0:05:58.520 --> 0:06:00.480 I already put it in there because I and see it. 0:06:00.560 --> 0:06:02.520 So I got you, Chris. You can go back, you know, 0:06:02.640 --> 0:06:03.840 go back to your nap or Chris. 0:06:03.880 --> 0:06:06.200 What is Chris think TV shows or Taylor Swift? 0:06:07.600 --> 0:06:09.320 Knowing Chris, I think he's going Taylor swift. 0:06:09.400 --> 0:06:10.880 You can put it in the private chat if you want. 0:06:11.000 --> 0:06:15.800 Chris Bobby Wit steals two bases Thursday on the O's. 0:06:16.560 --> 0:06:18.920 Joey gallohomers twice in that Yankee game. Again, that Yankee 0:06:18.960 --> 0:06:21.520 game was wild Byron Buxton had two dingers in that game. 0:06:21.960 --> 0:06:25.680 Trevor Larnick lunched a ball that hasn't landed yet. Clay 0:06:25.720 --> 0:06:27.920 Holmes did get his ninth save though, So a lot 0:06:28.000 --> 0:06:30.680 of stuff going on there. Some injury news to get 0:06:30.720 --> 0:06:32.239 to as well. We'll get to that in a second 0:06:32.279 --> 0:06:35.000 before we do. Jose Ramirez also up to fifteen on 0:06:35.120 --> 0:06:39.640 the board as well. Steven Strasburg, well, he's back and 0:06:39.800 --> 0:06:43.240 he gave up seven runs in his season debut. What 0:06:43.360 --> 0:06:46.200 are your takeaways from the first start for Steven Strasbourg, who, 0:06:46.240 --> 0:06:47.880 in all fairness, has not pitch at the big league 0:06:47.960 --> 0:06:50.040 level in a while. He might feel healthy, but he 0:06:50.200 --> 0:06:52.880 certainly doesn't look like Steven Strasburg, at least not yesterday. 0:06:53.200 --> 0:06:55.880 Well, at least my bets were in about his performance. 0:06:55.960 --> 0:06:59.960 It was just about him pitching. My thoughts he pitched, 0:07:01.720 --> 0:07:03.479 he didn't get hurt immediately. 0:07:04.040 --> 0:07:06.600 Those are Wow, that is a low bar. 0:07:07.279 --> 0:07:08.920 That is a very little good things. 0:07:08.960 --> 0:07:12.040 By the way that man Byron buckson, I'm starting to 0:07:12.080 --> 0:07:14.560 get hot. Don't let that man get hot. Don't don't 0:07:14.640 --> 0:07:16.720 let that man get hot, and let me change the 0:07:16.800 --> 0:07:18.640 vibe of this show for a couple of weeks. 0:07:18.760 --> 0:07:21.800 Just don't let it happen, all right. 0:07:21.880 --> 0:07:24.840 So Nelson Cruise was scratch from the lineup with back tightness. 0:07:25.240 --> 0:07:28.280 Tyler Stevenson goes on the aisle with a thumb so 0:07:28.520 --> 0:07:30.400 again hurt at the beginning of the air, hurt again. 0:07:30.840 --> 0:07:32.840 Mike Trout though, is hoping to return today, so keep 0:07:32.840 --> 0:07:35.120 an eye on that in your daily lineup, leagues. And 0:07:35.200 --> 0:07:37.200 then Garrett Whitlock is deal with a hip issue, so 0:07:37.280 --> 0:07:38.960 that's not great. So that explains a little bit maybe 0:07:39.000 --> 0:07:41.600 of the drop off recently. Chris Saiale, though, for Boston, 0:07:42.200 --> 0:07:46.760 returning to a reliever initially is a possibility. So there 0:07:46.840 --> 0:07:49.160 you have it. So Chris saale perhaps just trying to 0:07:49.240 --> 0:07:52.040 get back and help the team. And look, the Red 0:07:52.120 --> 0:07:55.160 Sox have turned things around in the last month after 0:07:55.240 --> 0:07:58.160 a terrible April. They've certainly, you know, kind of found 0:07:58.200 --> 0:08:01.960 themselves pulled themselves up by their haunches. If you a 0:08:02.000 --> 0:08:02.680 lot of haunt you know. 0:08:02.880 --> 0:08:05.120 You know, I'd be interested in. I wonder if the 0:08:05.200 --> 0:08:07.640 team would go how they use him. 0:08:07.640 --> 0:08:09.920 Would they use him back in that opener role like 0:08:10.000 --> 0:08:13.040 they've done in the past, or do you do what 0:08:13.240 --> 0:08:15.560 Joey wants for to Grom and do you go put 0:08:15.640 --> 0:08:18.080 him in a closing spot. I mean Chris Sale over 0:08:18.200 --> 0:08:20.760 one inning or two. That's an interesting thing. You can 0:08:20.760 --> 0:08:22.560 almost use him like Hater a couple of years ago. 0:08:22.760 --> 0:08:25.280 You could have him be the fireman for Boston. He's 0:08:25.320 --> 0:08:27.800 the guy that closes out games instead of flipping him 0:08:27.840 --> 0:08:29.239 and doing the opener. 0:08:29.360 --> 0:08:31.480 I think that would be so much more value. If 0:08:31.520 --> 0:08:34.640 you're gonna relieve Chris Sale praising, if you're gonna. 0:08:34.400 --> 0:08:36.720 Do that, put him in that role where he can 0:08:36.760 --> 0:08:39.520 be a fireman and shut out these games when your 0:08:39.520 --> 0:08:40.640 bullpen's a little suckers. 0:08:40.920 --> 0:08:43.079 Don't open him up on games. We don't need that. 0:08:43.280 --> 0:08:45.719 That closer thing has been a problem. What I think 0:08:45.800 --> 0:08:48.200 they might do personally is I think they might piggyback 0:08:48.280 --> 0:08:51.360 him and Whitlock together and then eventually make that turn 0:08:51.480 --> 0:08:53.839 to Whitlock going back into the closer role and Sale 0:08:53.840 --> 0:08:55.439 taking over in the rotation. Because I don't think you're 0:08:55.440 --> 0:08:58.240 paying I think you're paying sale too much right now 0:08:58.840 --> 0:09:01.360 to close games and you're still kind of from behind. 0:09:01.400 --> 0:09:03.120 Whereas with the met situation, when I said with the 0:09:03.200 --> 0:09:05.280 grom before, you know, a couple of months ago, that 0:09:05.400 --> 0:09:07.959 thought process with I'm hey, look, you've got a bunch 0:09:08.000 --> 0:09:10.480 of starting pitchers already, You're already in the first place, 0:09:10.559 --> 0:09:13.720 You're already, you know, the best team in baseball deep 0:09:14.240 --> 0:09:16.480 in terms of like both sides of the ball and 0:09:16.559 --> 0:09:19.520 everything you can do. Uh, it'll at least in that conversation, 0:09:20.160 --> 0:09:22.079 I think that's kind of where that thought process goes. 0:09:22.120 --> 0:09:24.240 But like, look, if the sale became a closer to that, 0:09:24.280 --> 0:09:26.559 wouldn't shock me. At this point, nothing shocks me. It's 0:09:27.640 --> 0:09:28.440 healthy and contributing. 0:09:28.760 --> 0:09:30.160 I really like the idea I'm in. 0:09:30.280 --> 0:09:32.560 I'm into like the piggybacking if you've got a lot 0:09:32.600 --> 0:09:34.520 of depth, like what the Padres were going to do, 0:09:34.679 --> 0:09:36.520 and it looks a little silly now, but they were 0:09:36.559 --> 0:09:38.200 going to do that with Clevenger and Gore. And at 0:09:38.240 --> 0:09:39.480 this point you got to find a way to make 0:09:39.520 --> 0:09:41.520 them all work, even if you go to six or 0:09:41.559 --> 0:09:45.240 you maintain a six. But I disagree that Sale makes 0:09:45.280 --> 0:09:47.800 too much money close out games. I mean, they've lost 0:09:47.960 --> 0:09:50.840 games by Matt Barnes being crapped. True this year, they've 0:09:51.080 --> 0:09:53.160 like that is a huge need that there's a if 0:09:53.240 --> 0:09:55.679 you here's my point though, if you are not going 0:09:55.760 --> 0:09:58.800 to commit to Chris Sales starting games, are you really 0:09:58.880 --> 0:10:02.520 better piggyback him two or three innings with Garrett Whitlock 0:10:02.640 --> 0:10:05.679 or you better just saying Chris Sale is going to 0:10:05.760 --> 0:10:08.520 be our dominant close out when we get there, and 0:10:08.640 --> 0:10:11.559 we can take him to maybe three innings to finish 0:10:11.640 --> 0:10:14.440 out the back half of games. I like that idea 0:10:14.559 --> 0:10:16.640 for them, and then maybe they can put focus on 0:10:16.679 --> 0:10:18.719 a trade of just getting one more starter to come in. 0:10:19.760 --> 0:10:22.200 He could be hater like here, I mean the amount 0:10:22.240 --> 0:10:25.400 of bullpen change that could happen over major League Baseball. 0:10:25.400 --> 0:10:27.640 I mean, like, you know, Clay Holmes is dominating. I 0:10:27.720 --> 0:10:30.320 think that guy, if he sticks in that role without Chapman, 0:10:30.400 --> 0:10:33.120 could be a top five closer. Chris Sale could do 0:10:33.320 --> 0:10:35.160 that same thing, and you could do it a couple 0:10:35.240 --> 0:10:37.480 times a week. I kind of I'm super into that, 0:10:38.480 --> 0:10:40.480 definitely over the stupid opener thing. 0:10:40.559 --> 0:10:41.480 I don't want that for him. 0:10:41.880 --> 0:10:43.160 Yeah, I don't want to do the opener thing. 0:10:43.200 --> 0:10:43.880 It's valueless. 0:10:43.880 --> 0:10:47.840 Okay, Well, I mean it depends on Also, if Chris Sale, 0:10:47.920 --> 0:10:50.360 you know, well, you're a closer, you might pitch a 0:10:50.400 --> 0:10:52.040 few days in a row. I don't know if that's 0:10:52.120 --> 0:10:53.880 the relief role they want him in, Like if it's 0:10:53.920 --> 0:10:55.760 a scheduled relief role when you know he's going to 0:10:55.800 --> 0:10:58.200 be pitching three innings because he's building up stamina. Okay, 0:10:58.679 --> 0:11:01.320 I understand that you'd rather him do that every fifth 0:11:01.360 --> 0:11:02.640 day at the big league level and give you big 0:11:02.720 --> 0:11:04.800 league innings as supposed to giving you triple A innings 0:11:04.840 --> 0:11:07.440 and rehab starts. That I understand. I feel like that's 0:11:07.480 --> 0:11:10.120 what they're saying. But maybe they should open themselves up 0:11:10.120 --> 0:11:13.560 to other opportunities. With Pavetta's pitch very well recently, if 0:11:13.600 --> 0:11:15.959 all these been pretty good, I mean, you can make 0:11:16.000 --> 0:11:17.839 that case. But personally, I think they're going to go 0:11:17.920 --> 0:11:20.079 put him back in the starter role. So but the 0:11:20.200 --> 0:11:23.120 nice thing is if if he gets enough I don't know, 0:11:23.240 --> 0:11:25.199 depending on your league, in the way it's all functioning, 0:11:25.559 --> 0:11:27.880 if somehow he ends up qualifying it relief pitcher because 0:11:27.880 --> 0:11:30.200 he gets enough appearances there, like if they if they 0:11:30.360 --> 0:11:32.760 kind of extend this over a month, I don't know, man, 0:11:32.800 --> 0:11:33.719 that's kind of interesting all. 0:11:33.679 --> 0:11:35.360 Of a sudden, and then he starts Yeah, then he 0:11:35.400 --> 0:11:38.120 would be one of those cheat code guys. Like imagine 0:11:38.160 --> 0:11:40.760 all these points, leagues and stuff with Louis Severino and 0:11:40.880 --> 0:11:43.240 Michael Kopek at the RP spot we talked about in 0:11:43.280 --> 0:11:45.480 the draft season. Those are the two biggest cheat codes 0:11:45.880 --> 0:11:48.280 instead of having closers, and you could be rocking both 0:11:48.280 --> 0:11:48.800 those guys and. 0:11:48.840 --> 0:11:51.000 You could throw sale into that mix. That'd be nice. Yeah, 0:11:51.080 --> 0:11:51.400 I dig it. 0:11:51.760 --> 0:11:54.040 Yeah. And of course all of that news came from 0:11:54.120 --> 0:11:57.440 the Fantasy Pro's news desk, which Mike Mayer wants us 0:11:57.520 --> 0:11:59.600 to obviously plug. 0:12:01.120 --> 0:12:07.319 Write down that RL everybody, we have a clickable one 0:12:07.360 --> 0:12:08.959 in there. That's not well, I guess we're got to 0:12:08.960 --> 0:12:09.640 copy and paste it. 0:12:10.400 --> 0:12:13.439 It's alright, all right. Before we move on to a 0:12:13.559 --> 0:12:16.160 lot of the heroes of the night, the hero of 0:12:16.320 --> 0:12:19.760 the grill is obviously Omaha Steaks, and you need to 0:12:19.840 --> 0:12:22.079 go get the Dad's Want Steaks package. You don't have 0:12:22.160 --> 0:12:24.280 that much time left to order it before Father's Day, 0:12:24.280 --> 0:12:26.520 so you better get on this today. Use the promo 0:12:26.559 --> 0:12:27.959 code leading off. What you do is you go to 0:12:28.040 --> 0:12:30.560 Omaha Steaks dot com type leading off in the search bar, 0:12:30.760 --> 0:12:32.120 Now I love a lot of people would check out 0:12:32.520 --> 0:12:34.559 trying to put leading off in. I've heard about this. 0:12:35.160 --> 0:12:36.839 It's in the search bar, and it's gonna take you 0:12:36.880 --> 0:12:39.680 to a beautiful landing page for the Dad Wants Steaks package. 0:12:39.880 --> 0:12:41.880 And for ninety nine bucks, you're gonna get the bacon 0:12:41.880 --> 0:12:44.640 wrap files, you're gonna get the jumbo Franks, you're gonna 0:12:44.679 --> 0:12:47.120 get the air chill boneless chicken breast, you're gonna get 0:12:47.120 --> 0:12:49.240 the caramel apple tartlet's, and you're gonna get eight free 0:12:49.280 --> 0:12:52.440 steak burgers. Baby, because you're using that promo code leading off. 0:12:52.520 --> 0:12:54.319 But do it in the search bar when you go 0:12:54.360 --> 0:12:56.520 to Almaha Steaks dot com. It's very important you do that. 0:12:57.200 --> 0:13:00.959 The almost staks are delicious, high quality meat, everything vacuum sealed, 0:13:01.000 --> 0:13:03.839 Everything is packed really well. And look, I mean, it 0:13:03.920 --> 0:13:05.800 makes a nice gift for yourself, a nice gift for 0:13:05.880 --> 0:13:07.880 your dad, a nice gift for any dad out there, 0:13:08.360 --> 0:13:11.360 or just anyone out there. So please go out there, 0:13:11.800 --> 0:13:14.360 go get yourself something nice and have some fun grilling. 0:13:14.400 --> 0:13:16.680 It's a beautiful day out there, hopefully the weekend, whether 0:13:16.679 --> 0:13:19.600 it's nice, and get that Omaha Steaks against Omaha Steaks 0:13:19.840 --> 0:13:22.560 dot com in the search bar, put in the promo 0:13:22.640 --> 0:13:25.760 code leading off. That's one word because Omaha steaks naturally 0:13:25.840 --> 0:13:29.079 age for the ultimate tenderness, juiciness and flavor, just like Welsh. 0:13:29.360 --> 0:13:33.760 You know, I would tell tell you not so a 0:13:34.120 --> 0:13:37.880 naturally I would tell you also, think of it like this. Mentally, 0:13:38.400 --> 0:13:41.520 you could have a family reunion and feed your entire 0:13:41.760 --> 0:13:44.880 family reunion with this box for the price of filling 0:13:44.960 --> 0:13:45.800 up your gas tank. 0:13:46.200 --> 0:13:46.520 That's it. 0:13:46.679 --> 0:13:47.280 That is the thing. 0:13:47.679 --> 0:13:51.679 I have a truck that horrifically maybe bad idea. I 0:13:51.800 --> 0:13:53.959 filled my tank up the other day, first time in 0:13:54.040 --> 0:13:57.959 quite a bit over one hundred dollars, and I was like, okay, 0:13:58.120 --> 0:14:00.800 what are we doing here? For less than filling up 0:14:00.920 --> 0:14:05.000 my tank, you can get an entire box of meat, 0:14:05.240 --> 0:14:07.760 all of meat in the world. You can have set 0:14:07.800 --> 0:14:09.719 you up for like a month, or you could have 0:14:09.800 --> 0:14:10.480 a tank of gas. 0:14:12.160 --> 0:14:14.360 Wonky Penguin suggest that, like I put the crown off 0:14:14.400 --> 0:14:17.199 for BETMGM, I should like slap myself with a with 0:14:17.320 --> 0:14:19.400 a t bone or something in order to do I 0:14:19.520 --> 0:14:20.240 wish we were in the. 0:14:20.240 --> 0:14:26.200 Same studio and I could sign up for that doing it. 0:14:26.960 --> 0:14:28.920 You would not be the first. All right, let's talk 0:14:28.920 --> 0:14:31.240 about some other of the awards too. I want to 0:14:31.280 --> 0:14:32.920 talk about this because this is a good point in 0:14:32.960 --> 0:14:36.480 the year to start discussing this. I have already officially 0:14:36.960 --> 0:14:39.040 cash out of any other thing that I had. I 0:14:39.120 --> 0:14:41.040 only had I think Bobby Witt, and I had a 0:14:41.080 --> 0:14:43.960 little small piece of Joe Ryan for American League Rookie 0:14:43.960 --> 0:14:46.440 of the Year. It's all on Julio. Julio's gonna be 0:14:46.440 --> 0:14:48.520 a minus number this time. Next week it's plus one 0:14:48.600 --> 0:14:51.720 sixty five consensus. Fox bet still has it at plus 0:14:51.800 --> 0:14:55.200 two twenty five. Betmgm's going to plus one forty. So 0:14:55.760 --> 0:14:57.480 go ahead and find the best one you can. But 0:14:57.640 --> 0:15:00.440 Julio is my guy. I made a hefty investment Julio. 0:15:00.520 --> 0:15:03.600 I'm a little side piece investment after the rocky April 0:15:03.720 --> 0:15:06.520 just in case I've already gotten out of those reinvested 0:15:06.520 --> 0:15:08.560 them into Julio, even though it's late in the game, 0:15:08.600 --> 0:15:10.520 because I do believe wells this race is going away. 0:15:10.600 --> 0:15:13.680 Do you agree, I'm not well No, I don't necessarily agree. 0:15:13.760 --> 0:15:16.560 I do agree. It is Julio right now. It is Julio. 0:15:16.680 --> 0:15:18.280 I mean, and we know what's so funny. 0:15:18.320 --> 0:15:22.440 It's like, remember what we were doing the whole bold predictions, 0:15:22.640 --> 0:15:24.400 and the one I had was for Bobby Witt, and 0:15:24.520 --> 0:15:26.120 it would be he would running away with it, and 0:15:26.200 --> 0:15:28.240 it happens to be Julio. You know, fifty to fifty 0:15:28.320 --> 0:15:30.760 chants on those the only thing I would throw out 0:15:30.840 --> 0:15:34.120 to you. I agree with Julia, that's a smart money bet. 0:15:34.440 --> 0:15:39.240 But I might for just a couple bucks on Bobby 0:15:39.280 --> 0:15:41.160 Witt at this point, just stole a couple more bases. 0:15:41.200 --> 0:15:43.440 He's got ten stolen bases, seven homers on the earth. 0:15:43.440 --> 0:15:45.760 The average isn't there. It is a garbage team. 0:15:45.960 --> 0:15:47.840 Mariners aren't doing nice spells much better, but it's like 0:15:48.360 --> 0:15:49.000 nine hundred. 0:15:49.000 --> 0:15:51.960 Well they're both garbage teams. But the difference is Julio 0:15:52.280 --> 0:15:57.200 has highlight reels. He is I completely the difference, and 0:15:57.280 --> 0:15:59.680 I think that's what's capturing. And Bobby Wood's a great 0:15:59.720 --> 0:16:03.600 base but Julio has a certain flair. He's got that weird, 0:16:03.800 --> 0:16:06.800 that yasie o puigue factor, that fun to watch factor, 0:16:06.960 --> 0:16:09.880 you know, like he is sometimes people are just entertaining 0:16:09.920 --> 0:16:11.160 when they play BASEBALLO. 0:16:11.200 --> 0:16:13.200 He's absolutely electric. I'm just saying that matters. 0:16:13.480 --> 0:16:17.080 You've got a rookie on June tenth, who is projecting 0:16:17.520 --> 0:16:20.520 to be a twenty twenty five guy still, and it's not. 0:16:20.720 --> 0:16:21.720 Just Julio Rodriguez. 0:16:21.760 --> 0:16:24.400 My only point is is if I, let's just say 0:16:24.400 --> 0:16:26.040 I had one hundred bucks and I was going to 0:16:26.080 --> 0:16:29.040 dedicate it all to Rookie of the Year, betting seventy 0:16:29.120 --> 0:16:30.680 five of it, I would want to. 0:16:30.680 --> 0:16:31.880 Put on Julio Rodriguez. 0:16:32.080 --> 0:16:34.480 But I'm about twenty five of that on Bobby Wit 0:16:34.600 --> 0:16:37.440 at nine to one right now, just in case the 0:16:37.680 --> 0:16:38.720 second half starts going. 0:16:38.840 --> 0:16:41.240 Bobby Witt is that type of guy for sure. Julio 0:16:41.320 --> 0:16:42.160 Rodriguez is. 0:16:42.200 --> 0:16:44.600 Showing us exactly who he should be, and you know 0:16:44.760 --> 0:16:47.440 the weird calls earlier in the season, That's how I 0:16:47.440 --> 0:16:49.360 would approach us. There's nobody else I would go with. 0:16:49.480 --> 0:16:52.000 Julio's a smart bet. That's the primary money, and you 0:16:52.080 --> 0:16:53.720 know what, you might be right that it gets to 0:16:54.600 --> 0:16:57.200 it gets to minus money here soon. But Bobby WIT's 0:16:57.240 --> 0:16:58.640 just a little too enticing for me. 0:16:58.720 --> 0:17:02.680 In that race National League MVP, it's still Mookie Bets 0:17:02.720 --> 0:17:04.840 at plus two ninety and the consensus on betting pros 0:17:04.920 --> 0:17:08.880 Manny Machado's at plus four to twenty, so is Paul 0:17:08.960 --> 0:17:12.320 Goldschmid Harper is at nine to fifty range still Pete 0:17:12.320 --> 0:17:14.879 Alonzo's twelve to one in some spots. Other places have 0:17:14.960 --> 0:17:16.720 dropped him down to eight fifty, which I see, so 0:17:16.800 --> 0:17:19.840 there's a big variance there. I still feel like Alonzo 0:17:19.880 --> 0:17:23.400 and a Kune are lurking in this race and Mookie bets. 0:17:23.520 --> 0:17:26.959 Just again, I haven't made a big investment on Nation 0:17:27.040 --> 0:17:29.199 League MVP yet. I cash out of Harper because once 0:17:29.440 --> 0:17:31.479 once the manager gets fired, it's real tough to then 0:17:31.520 --> 0:17:32.920 think that, Okay, this team is going to be really 0:17:32.920 --> 0:17:35.160 good the rest of the year. It rarely happens. Yeah, 0:17:35.160 --> 0:17:37.320 I mean I would think with Otani, now that's worried 0:17:37.359 --> 0:17:38.800 me too. In the American League, to be ones, if. 0:17:38.760 --> 0:17:40.800 You had the ability to cash out, it's smart because 0:17:40.840 --> 0:17:44.160 you could get back in in theory like a better price. 0:17:44.440 --> 0:17:47.359 I would not discount Harper, you know, Goldie is the 0:17:47.440 --> 0:17:48.879 one I would feel a little bit better about. 0:17:48.920 --> 0:17:50.480 I mean, he is on the sole reasons. 0:17:50.520 --> 0:17:52.879