WEBVTT - Fantasy Football Weekly Week 10

0:00:00.080 --> 0:00:07.480
<v Speaker 1>And time now for Fantasy Football Weekly on k f

0:00:07.520 --> 0:00:12.200
<v Speaker 1>a N, presented by Devani's, your weekly source for the

0:00:12.280 --> 0:00:17.880
<v Speaker 1>nation's best fantasy speculation and advice. Fantasy Football Weekly is

0:00:17.920 --> 0:00:22.279
<v Speaker 1>also brought to you by Green Belt Premium, no name

0:00:22.400 --> 0:00:28.600
<v Speaker 1>Butcher Quality meets Honda, town Hall Family, and by the

0:00:28.800 --> 0:00:34.640
<v Speaker 1>Park Tavern. Now now along with Fanball and League Saves

0:00:34.680 --> 0:00:41.640
<v Speaker 1>Matt Harrison and Brian Johnson. Here's Paul Charchy in good morning,

0:00:41.720 --> 0:00:45.120
<v Speaker 1>and it is early morning. It's our seven am start

0:00:45.159 --> 0:00:49.080
<v Speaker 1>for Fantasy Football Weekly. Gopher kickoff is eleven o'clock. Pregame

0:00:49.080 --> 0:00:51.560
<v Speaker 1>at nine o'clock, so we are adjusted back a couple

0:00:51.640 --> 0:00:54.920
<v Speaker 1>hours before that two hours of fantasy football. Goodness. I'm

0:00:54.960 --> 0:00:58.200
<v Speaker 1>Paul Charching. My co host Brian Johnson almost as always,

0:00:58.680 --> 0:01:02.400
<v Speaker 1>can't quite say as always, the audacity to take the

0:01:02.480 --> 0:01:06.600
<v Speaker 1>one week off. And then Matt Harrison, good morning, guys,

0:01:06.800 --> 0:01:09.800
<v Speaker 1>not as much always not your rarely and they're rarely

0:01:09.840 --> 0:01:12.400
<v Speaker 1>seen three out of the next four alright, good, alright,

0:01:12.400 --> 0:01:14.160
<v Speaker 1>good do enough to change the liner for at least

0:01:14.200 --> 0:01:16.520
<v Speaker 1>three out of the next four weeks. It made sense

0:01:16.600 --> 0:01:19.480
<v Speaker 1>this morning, at least the intro. The intro made sense,

0:01:19.840 --> 0:01:22.640
<v Speaker 1>if only, if only this time, take a chance on me.

0:01:22.800 --> 0:01:26.200
<v Speaker 1>Five tough questions, premature speculation, lightning round, and we'll break

0:01:26.240 --> 0:01:30.120
<v Speaker 1>down all of the matchups. And that begins with Packers

0:01:30.280 --> 0:01:33.160
<v Speaker 1>at Bears. Matt It's got no point now where no

0:01:33.319 --> 0:01:37.440
<v Speaker 1>Packer feels safe. I have the entire Green Bay Packers

0:01:37.480 --> 0:01:41.200
<v Speaker 1>offense on the bench except for one player. That's Davante Adams,

0:01:41.240 --> 0:01:44.160
<v Speaker 1>who only gets us see number one. Wide receivers have

0:01:44.280 --> 0:01:46.400
<v Speaker 1>actually got it done against the Bears more than any

0:01:46.400 --> 0:01:49.120
<v Speaker 1>other position this year. Antonio Brown was the only wide

0:01:49.120 --> 0:01:51.640
<v Speaker 1>receiver to top a hundred yards. Jordi had seventy five

0:01:51.680 --> 0:01:53.920
<v Speaker 1>and two scores in the first meeting. Michael Thomas had

0:01:53.960 --> 0:01:57.080
<v Speaker 1>seven catches for seventy seven last week. And Adams has

0:01:57.160 --> 0:01:59.760
<v Speaker 1>taken over as the Packers lead wide receiver since Hunley

0:01:59.760 --> 0:02:02.800
<v Speaker 1>has been the quarterback. He leads the wide receiver group

0:02:02.800 --> 0:02:06.120
<v Speaker 1>and targets, catches, yards and touchdowns since Hounley took over.

0:02:06.280 --> 0:02:11.080
<v Speaker 1>This is not uncommon with with young developing quarterbacks where

0:02:11.240 --> 0:02:14.960
<v Speaker 1>they just can't go through three and four progressions, so

0:02:15.080 --> 0:02:17.880
<v Speaker 1>they go to one A and I'll throw that guy

0:02:17.960 --> 0:02:20.079
<v Speaker 1>the ball if easy, remotely open. And so I think

0:02:20.080 --> 0:02:23.000
<v Speaker 1>Adams is enjoying some of that. Yeah. The bad news

0:02:23.080 --> 0:02:24.880
<v Speaker 1>is the last time the Bears allowed to score to

0:02:24.919 --> 0:02:28.320
<v Speaker 1>a wide receiver it was against the Packers in Week four. Geez,

0:02:28.800 --> 0:02:31.440
<v Speaker 1>and they allowed four in that game. Uh. The offense

0:02:31.560 --> 0:02:34.040
<v Speaker 1>is completely struggled under Hunley, and the Bears are top

0:02:34.080 --> 0:02:36.640
<v Speaker 1>ten defense, especially at home, where they're only allowing fifteen

0:02:36.639 --> 0:02:39.840
<v Speaker 1>points per game. Huntley faces a Bears defense it's only

0:02:39.880 --> 0:02:42.799
<v Speaker 1>allowed eighty nine rushing yards total the quarterbacks this year,

0:02:42.840 --> 0:02:44.720
<v Speaker 1>and that's where a lot of his value is predicated.

0:02:44.760 --> 0:02:48.400
<v Speaker 1>So he's on the bench. Chicago's only allowed eight passing

0:02:48.440 --> 0:02:51.320
<v Speaker 1>touchdowns this year, seven rushing touchdowns in eight games, and

0:02:51.320 --> 0:02:53.560
<v Speaker 1>they held the Saints to twenty points in New Orleans

0:02:53.600 --> 0:02:56.800
<v Speaker 1>in the last game. Well, Kamara and Ingram both scored

0:02:56.840 --> 0:02:59.000
<v Speaker 1>in that game. Montgomery and Aaron Jones are not on

0:02:59.120 --> 0:03:01.959
<v Speaker 1>par with Rob without Rogers, so they're on the bench.

0:03:02.280 --> 0:03:04.920
<v Speaker 1>And that's really it for the Packers. Notice I didn't

0:03:04.919 --> 0:03:09.200
<v Speaker 1>even mention Jordy Nelson. He's just an afterthoughts in this office.

0:03:08.320 --> 0:03:12.000
<v Speaker 1>Is I know there there are people dropping Jordy out right.

0:03:12.120 --> 0:03:13.560
<v Speaker 1>I've seen it. I've seen it happen in one of

0:03:13.560 --> 0:03:16.680
<v Speaker 1>my leagues. As if someone should trade Jordy for mor

0:03:16.720 --> 0:03:19.120
<v Speaker 1>Tavis Bryant. Yeah, I saw that tweet as well. I

0:03:19.360 --> 0:03:21.760
<v Speaker 1>didn't know. I didn't know what to say either. Pick

0:03:21.840 --> 0:03:25.120
<v Speaker 1>your poison. It's not good on the Bear side. I

0:03:25.120 --> 0:03:27.200
<v Speaker 1>got one starter, and it's Jordan Howard, who gets an

0:03:27.200 --> 0:03:29.519
<v Speaker 1>A grade. The Packers are allowing a hundred and eighteen

0:03:29.600 --> 0:03:32.480
<v Speaker 1>rushing yards per game. They've given up a running back

0:03:32.520 --> 0:03:37.560
<v Speaker 1>touchdown in every game a r that's after Rogers. Howard

0:03:37.560 --> 0:03:40.400
<v Speaker 1>has had thirty six and twenty three rushing attempts in

0:03:40.440 --> 0:03:42.800
<v Speaker 1>the bears last three games. He's just getting the rock

0:03:42.840 --> 0:03:45.880
<v Speaker 1>a lot treat. Cohen is on the bench. He's droppable.

0:03:45.880 --> 0:03:48.920
<v Speaker 1>He's had exactly one catch per game. Since Mitch Drabinski

0:03:49.000 --> 0:03:51.160
<v Speaker 1>took over at quarterbacks, I thought I thought it was

0:03:51.160 --> 0:03:53.320
<v Speaker 1>gonna go the other way. I'll be honest. I'm so

0:03:53.440 --> 0:03:56.880
<v Speaker 1>used to seeing young quarterbacks dump off balls to running

0:03:56.880 --> 0:04:00.400
<v Speaker 1>backs and and you know safety safety outlet, the stuff,

0:04:00.400 --> 0:04:04.520
<v Speaker 1>security blanket stuff. Now, well, trubisky safety outlet was Zach Miller.

0:04:04.560 --> 0:04:07.320
<v Speaker 1>And while he still has two legs barely, he might

0:04:07.400 --> 0:04:11.000
<v Speaker 1>never play again. Kendall Wright hasn't topped fifty yards or

0:04:11.040 --> 0:04:13.440
<v Speaker 1>scored in Trubisky's four starts, so the rest of the

0:04:13.440 --> 0:04:16.400
<v Speaker 1>passing game, including Robinsky, is on the bench. Even if

0:04:16.440 --> 0:04:19.040
<v Speaker 1>I tell you this golden nugget of information that tomorrow

0:04:19.080 --> 0:04:24.320
<v Speaker 1>is Kendall Wright's birthday, Oh bus, he might get the

0:04:24.400 --> 0:04:29.640
<v Speaker 1>fifty yards then alright, Vikings take on the Redskins. I've

0:04:29.680 --> 0:04:33.680
<v Speaker 1>got I've got an A one A grade between both teams,

0:04:33.680 --> 0:04:36.239
<v Speaker 1>and it's for Kyle Rudolph. He has scored a touchdown

0:04:36.320 --> 0:04:38.840
<v Speaker 1>and each of his three career games against Washington, and

0:04:38.880 --> 0:04:41.560
<v Speaker 1>the Redskins have just been abused by tight ends all season.

0:04:41.880 --> 0:04:45.160
<v Speaker 1>They've allowed a league worst eight yards per game to

0:04:45.279 --> 0:04:49.120
<v Speaker 1>tight ends, and Rudolph averaging eight targets per game over

0:04:49.160 --> 0:04:51.160
<v Speaker 1>the last four weeks. Now a lot of those were

0:04:51.200 --> 0:04:54.960
<v Speaker 1>without Stefon Diggs now digs back, so that worries me

0:04:55.000 --> 0:04:57.160
<v Speaker 1>a little bit about Rudolph, But still I'm giving him

0:04:57.160 --> 0:04:59.960
<v Speaker 1>an A grade here. The rest of the Vikings starters

0:05:00.000 --> 0:05:06.640
<v Speaker 1>C grades. Adam Feland goes up against slot corner Kendall Fuller, uh,

0:05:06.800 --> 0:05:09.000
<v Speaker 1>who has been really a mixed bag here. The Redskins

0:05:09.000 --> 0:05:12.320
<v Speaker 1>have given up touchdowns and Nelson Agilare twice from the slot.

0:05:12.600 --> 0:05:14.919
<v Speaker 1>Doug Baldwin had a massive game from the slot, but

0:05:14.920 --> 0:05:17.200
<v Speaker 1>He's also Kendall Fuller has also shut down some other

0:05:17.200 --> 0:05:20.280
<v Speaker 1>good slot receivers, so it's a mixed bag here. Celand

0:05:20.320 --> 0:05:22.400
<v Speaker 1>has at least five receptions in every game, and I

0:05:22.440 --> 0:05:24.680
<v Speaker 1>still think it's it's gonna be a typical Theeling game

0:05:24.680 --> 0:05:27.599
<v Speaker 1>where you're gonna get six seven receptions eight yards and

0:05:27.600 --> 0:05:31.000
<v Speaker 1>he probably won't score. Stefan dig c gradecent healthy for

0:05:31.040 --> 0:05:32.880
<v Speaker 1>the first time and over a month and runs the

0:05:32.920 --> 0:05:34.920
<v Speaker 1>majority of his plays on the right side of the field,

0:05:34.920 --> 0:05:38.280
<v Speaker 1>which means he'll draw Josh Norman, who almost never ventures

0:05:38.320 --> 0:05:41.560
<v Speaker 1>away from that side of the field. Norman hasn't allowed

0:05:41.600 --> 0:05:45.960
<v Speaker 1>a touchdown this year, and opposing number one receivers consistently

0:05:46.160 --> 0:05:49.600
<v Speaker 1>shut down against Josh Norman. It is a tough assignment

0:05:49.640 --> 0:05:51.520
<v Speaker 1>for Steph Diggs. He goes down to a sne like

0:05:51.560 --> 0:05:55.040
<v Speaker 1>a Digs decoy. It could be it could be uh

0:05:55.080 --> 0:05:58.640
<v Speaker 1>and maybe all the better for Rudolph Jerk McKenna. Let's

0:05:58.640 --> 0:06:00.120
<v Speaker 1>stay with the passing him will trap up that at

0:06:00.120 --> 0:06:03.159
<v Speaker 1>first case. Keenum, I've got a tentative see and maybe

0:06:03.160 --> 0:06:05.200
<v Speaker 1>a bench grade here. Redskins have played a lot of

0:06:05.200 --> 0:06:08.120
<v Speaker 1>good quarterbacks and they've handled almost all of them, basically

0:06:08.120 --> 0:06:10.280
<v Speaker 1>all of them other than Carson Wentz, who has put

0:06:10.360 --> 0:06:14.920
<v Speaker 1>up two massive games against them. The average non Winsonian

0:06:15.040 --> 0:06:19.640
<v Speaker 1>game against the Redskins two hundred twenty five yards and

0:06:19.760 --> 0:06:22.719
<v Speaker 1>one touchdown. That's it, And that's almost exactly what case

0:06:22.800 --> 0:06:24.799
<v Speaker 1>Keenum gives you on a weekend and week out basis.

0:06:25.279 --> 0:06:28.200
<v Speaker 1>So to me, that's barely C grade chart. You got

0:06:28.240 --> 0:06:31.159
<v Speaker 1>your finger on the pulse of the Vikings. Is the

0:06:31.279 --> 0:06:35.400
<v Speaker 1>leash for Keenum short. Now that Teddy is back, could

0:06:35.440 --> 0:06:37.440
<v Speaker 1>not if he doesn't give away games, I think they

0:06:37.440 --> 0:06:39.960
<v Speaker 1>can even lose games as long as he's not the

0:06:40.000 --> 0:06:43.520
<v Speaker 1>three turnover guy to cause those losses. So I think he.

0:06:43.680 --> 0:06:46.600
<v Speaker 1>I think cases pretty safe actually, all right, So now

0:06:46.640 --> 0:06:48.400
<v Speaker 1>let's talk about Jack McKinnon for just a moment. Of

0:06:48.480 --> 0:06:51.719
<v Speaker 1>the last four weeks, he's averaging twenty one touches, one

0:06:52.160 --> 0:06:54.320
<v Speaker 1>six total yards, and a touchdown per game. Those are

0:06:54.360 --> 0:06:59.839
<v Speaker 1>great workhorse style numbers. Elite backs like Todd Gurley, Kareem Hunt,

0:07:00.480 --> 0:07:03.599
<v Speaker 1>Zeke Elliott have posted very big games against the Redskins,

0:07:03.640 --> 0:07:08.000
<v Speaker 1>but nobody else has. Only the big workhorse elite level

0:07:08.040 --> 0:07:11.680
<v Speaker 1>workhorse backs have gotten it done against the Redskins. You

0:07:11.720 --> 0:07:14.720
<v Speaker 1>can decide on for yourself if Jerick McKinnon belongs to

0:07:14.760 --> 0:07:18.240
<v Speaker 1>that conversation, is he in the conversation with Girly Hunt

0:07:18.240 --> 0:07:20.720
<v Speaker 1>and Elliott? Hundred six yards in a touchdown per game

0:07:20.760 --> 0:07:26.440
<v Speaker 1>would suggests he is non Girly Hunt Elliott backs against

0:07:26.440 --> 0:07:31.480
<v Speaker 1>the Redskins, nobody has topped fifty yards, So that's your downside.

0:07:32.000 --> 0:07:33.760
<v Speaker 1>I've got a C grade on Jack McKinnon. Let's go

0:07:33.800 --> 0:07:35.680
<v Speaker 1>to the Washington side, where I've got a handful of

0:07:35.680 --> 0:07:38.000
<v Speaker 1>Sea grades and that's it. Kirk Cousins comes in with

0:07:38.000 --> 0:07:40.040
<v Speaker 1>a sea There's a litany of problems for Cousins in

0:07:40.040 --> 0:07:42.840
<v Speaker 1>this matchup. Offensive line is all kinds of banged up.

0:07:42.840 --> 0:07:44.720
<v Speaker 1>I think they may only end up missing one starter,

0:07:44.800 --> 0:07:47.280
<v Speaker 1>but a bunch of guys playing hurt um. The Vikings

0:07:47.280 --> 0:07:50.320
<v Speaker 1>have an elite sacking defense that will test that offensive line.

0:07:50.320 --> 0:07:53.400
<v Speaker 1>Of course, you may be shorthanded here without Jamison Crowder,

0:07:53.440 --> 0:07:55.600
<v Speaker 1>who's shaping up as a game time decision, Jordan Reid

0:07:55.840 --> 0:07:58.280
<v Speaker 1>shaping up as a game time decision. And then there's

0:07:58.280 --> 0:08:00.520
<v Speaker 1>the matter of the Vikings secondary, which is very good anyway.

0:08:00.560 --> 0:08:03.520
<v Speaker 1>They ranked fifth and touchdown passes allowed seventh and passing

0:08:03.560 --> 0:08:06.640
<v Speaker 1>yardage allowed. A very tough game for Kirk Cousins coming.

0:08:07.120 --> 0:08:10.160
<v Speaker 1>The only part of his receiving game that I've got

0:08:10.160 --> 0:08:13.000
<v Speaker 1>a starting grade on is Vernon Davis because with without

0:08:13.080 --> 0:08:16.440
<v Speaker 1>Jordan reading the lineup, he's still been reliable. He's averaging

0:08:16.440 --> 0:08:19.440
<v Speaker 1>four catches sixty two yards in every game since the

0:08:19.480 --> 0:08:24.680
<v Speaker 1>opener read game time decision hamstring injury. But it might

0:08:24.680 --> 0:08:26.720
<v Speaker 1>not matter either way. The Vikings are very good against

0:08:26.720 --> 0:08:29.240
<v Speaker 1>tight ends. They're holding the forty five yards per game

0:08:29.240 --> 0:08:32.320
<v Speaker 1>as a position. None of top forty yards against the

0:08:32.360 --> 0:08:35.120
<v Speaker 1>Vikings since the opener suggest to see grade on Davis

0:08:35.200 --> 0:08:37.960
<v Speaker 1>and if read, actually we're healthy, implying you might even

0:08:37.960 --> 0:08:41.280
<v Speaker 1>just take him into the bench area. Darrell Prior's out.

0:08:41.320 --> 0:08:44.240
<v Speaker 1>He's collected three or fewer receptions in seven straight games.

0:08:44.720 --> 0:08:47.280
<v Speaker 1>Josh Dockson's got to average more than two catches a game.

0:08:47.480 --> 0:08:50.720
<v Speaker 1>I just that's just not enough volume. I also worried

0:08:50.720 --> 0:08:52.719
<v Speaker 1>that he's gonna see Xavier Rhads and then it's it's

0:08:52.800 --> 0:08:58.000
<v Speaker 1>game over for Josh Dockson. Lastly, go to the running game.

0:08:58.480 --> 0:09:00.920
<v Speaker 1>Rob Kelly is on the bench. He's a pure touchdown play.

0:09:00.960 --> 0:09:02.480
<v Speaker 1>He has scored three times in the last two games,

0:09:02.480 --> 0:09:04.240
<v Speaker 1>which is great, But the good news ends there. The

0:09:04.280 --> 0:09:07.240
<v Speaker 1>Vikings have only given up two rushing touchdowns all year.

0:09:07.600 --> 0:09:10.760
<v Speaker 1>They ranked third and rushing yards allowed, and Rob Kelly's

0:09:10.800 --> 0:09:14.440
<v Speaker 1>averaging two yards to carry two. I know you you

0:09:14.520 --> 0:09:17.240
<v Speaker 1>talked about it, but I'm counting six offensive linemen on

0:09:17.280 --> 0:09:21.560
<v Speaker 1>the injury report for washing. Isn't it ridiculous? Terrible? Like

0:09:21.640 --> 0:09:25.040
<v Speaker 1>all of them. Chris Thompson is normally a very safe play,

0:09:25.080 --> 0:09:28.199
<v Speaker 1>but he's also had this string of matchups against teams

0:09:28.200 --> 0:09:31.280
<v Speaker 1>that struggle against running backs through the air that ends here.

0:09:31.640 --> 0:09:36.320
<v Speaker 1>The Vikings alread elite past catching defense for running backs.

0:09:37.160 --> 0:09:38.800
<v Speaker 1>I've given out these stats a few times in a

0:09:38.800 --> 0:09:41.320
<v Speaker 1>lot of different formats. I'll do it again here. Here

0:09:41.320 --> 0:09:44.360
<v Speaker 1>are these are I'm gonna the Vikings have faced just

0:09:44.480 --> 0:09:48.320
<v Speaker 1>this litany of excellent pass catching running backs, and listen

0:09:48.360 --> 0:09:51.199
<v Speaker 1>to what they've done. Alvin Camara twenty yards through the air,

0:09:51.440 --> 0:09:56.120
<v Speaker 1>Lavan Bell four yards, Theoretic eight yards, Tarik Cohen negative

0:09:56.160 --> 0:10:00.680
<v Speaker 1>eight yards, Tie Montgomery three yards, Bunk Alan twenty nine yards,

0:10:00.960 --> 0:10:04.160
<v Speaker 1>and in their last game, Duke Johnson ten yards. So

0:10:04.200 --> 0:10:06.200
<v Speaker 1>I just I I've got to see great and Chris

0:10:06.280 --> 0:10:08.679
<v Speaker 1>Thompson just because I think it's a talent. But I

0:10:08.720 --> 0:10:11.680
<v Speaker 1>don't expect him to do very much here. Let's go

0:10:11.720 --> 0:10:13.800
<v Speaker 1>to our final matchup of this segment and it is

0:10:14.520 --> 0:10:17.920
<v Speaker 1>the New Orleans Saints taking on the Buffalo Bills. New

0:10:18.040 --> 0:10:22.240
<v Speaker 1>Orleans Saints have turned into a run first offense. What

0:10:22.320 --> 0:10:26.080
<v Speaker 1>do you think about Alvin Camara mark Ingram? Yeah, I

0:10:26.120 --> 0:10:28.120
<v Speaker 1>like Alvin Camara a little more in this game. I'm

0:10:28.120 --> 0:10:30.040
<v Speaker 1>giving him a b um. He's the league leader in

0:10:30.120 --> 0:10:32.800
<v Speaker 1>yards per carry at six point. Oh, give him more

0:10:32.840 --> 0:10:35.520
<v Speaker 1>carries please? Well, we don't like to see that. This

0:10:35.559 --> 0:10:38.439
<v Speaker 1>matchup is really about the receiving for Camara. Buffalo was

0:10:38.480 --> 0:10:41.080
<v Speaker 1>allowing running backs to catch nearly six passes per game.

0:10:41.400 --> 0:10:44.240
<v Speaker 1>Camara's top five among running backs and targets, receptions, and

0:10:44.320 --> 0:10:47.000
<v Speaker 1>receiving yards. So you do the math. Camara should do

0:10:47.080 --> 0:10:49.760
<v Speaker 1>pretty well here. I don't like um mark Ingram as much.

0:10:49.760 --> 0:10:54.080
<v Speaker 1>I'm gonna give him a strong See Buffalo bottom six

0:10:54.080 --> 0:10:57.600
<v Speaker 1>and opponent rushing play percentage. Opponents are running just thirty

0:10:58.120 --> 0:11:00.319
<v Speaker 1>of the time against the Bills, and Buffalo has yet

0:11:00.320 --> 0:11:03.000
<v Speaker 1>to allow an opposing running back to reach eighty rushing yards.

0:11:03.000 --> 0:11:04.640
<v Speaker 1>So I like com here a little more than Ingram here.

0:11:04.640 --> 0:11:08.320
<v Speaker 1>But you're definitely starting both to the passing game. Uh,

0:11:08.400 --> 0:11:10.719
<v Speaker 1>let's go with to start with Drew Brees. It's no

0:11:10.800 --> 0:11:13.720
<v Speaker 1>surprise Breeze has more passing touchdowns on the road this year.

0:11:14.559 --> 0:11:17.079
<v Speaker 1>There's a surprise. Well, you just ruined my punch line

0:11:17.160 --> 0:11:20.160
<v Speaker 1>charge but yeah, sorry, I was active. Here you go again, No,

0:11:20.280 --> 0:11:24.240
<v Speaker 1>just go again. We got Wet and Bryan over here.

0:11:24.960 --> 0:11:29.400
<v Speaker 1>That is a surprise. I'm giving Breeze this to see

0:11:29.440 --> 0:11:31.199
<v Speaker 1>here though, even though he's better on the road. Now,

0:11:31.280 --> 0:11:34.000
<v Speaker 1>that's that's a joke. Of course, bad matchup Buffalo is allowed.

0:11:34.000 --> 0:11:37.400
<v Speaker 1>The third few is touchdowns passing touchdowns just seven all year.

0:11:37.440 --> 0:11:39.920
<v Speaker 1>Only one of posing quarterback has topped one passing touchdown.

0:11:40.160 --> 0:11:42.319
<v Speaker 1>Breeze could do it, but his ceiling isn't as high

0:11:42.320 --> 0:11:45.079
<v Speaker 1>as usually is. Michael Thomas will give a b You

0:11:45.160 --> 0:11:48.040
<v Speaker 1>might be borderline a if cornerback E J. Gaines misses

0:11:48.080 --> 0:11:51.560
<v Speaker 1>his third straight game, he's questionable right now. Thomas owners

0:11:51.600 --> 0:11:53.760
<v Speaker 1>are certainly hoping for that, but you're starting him either way.

0:11:53.840 --> 0:11:55.719
<v Speaker 1>I think Thomas is gonna gonna have a nice game

0:11:55.760 --> 0:11:59.520
<v Speaker 1>here too. I'm seeing him traded for nothing in a

0:11:59.559 --> 0:12:02.200
<v Speaker 1>couple of a couple of my leagues. People are really

0:12:02.200 --> 0:12:03.800
<v Speaker 1>down on him, and I don't think this is the

0:12:03.840 --> 0:12:05.720
<v Speaker 1>time to give up. No, but he's been very consistent,

0:12:05.760 --> 0:12:08.679
<v Speaker 1>has been blowing up like been very consistent. Ted Ginn

0:12:08.800 --> 0:12:12.839
<v Speaker 1>also been surprisingly consistent. Uh likely to draw trade Davious White, though,

0:12:12.840 --> 0:12:15.560
<v Speaker 1>who grades out as Pro Football focuses number ten cornerback

0:12:15.559 --> 0:12:17.880
<v Speaker 1>and coverage. He's been much better than a boom er

0:12:17.920 --> 0:12:19.760
<v Speaker 1>bust guy this year. Again has but that's kind of

0:12:19.760 --> 0:12:21.439
<v Speaker 1>what he feels like this week. I'm just giving him

0:12:21.440 --> 0:12:24.720
<v Speaker 1>a c I'm benching Brandon Coleman and Willie Snead. Snead

0:12:24.800 --> 0:12:27.559
<v Speaker 1>went from four to eighteen snaps last week. Coleman went

0:12:27.600 --> 0:12:29.800
<v Speaker 1>down from fourty gate to thirty. Maybe they meet more

0:12:29.800 --> 0:12:31.480
<v Speaker 1>in the middle of this week, but just the matchup

0:12:31.480 --> 0:12:33.319
<v Speaker 1>isn't right anyway, so I got both on the bench.

0:12:34.160 --> 0:12:36.720
<v Speaker 1>That's it for the Saints. Over to Buffalo, starting with

0:12:36.800 --> 0:12:40.280
<v Speaker 1>Lashawn McCoy. Shady returns home where he's averaging a hundred

0:12:40.280 --> 0:12:42.559
<v Speaker 1>and thirty combo yards per game dating back to the

0:12:42.559 --> 0:12:45.160
<v Speaker 1>start of last season. The Saints are allowing four point

0:12:45.200 --> 0:12:47.920
<v Speaker 1>seven yards per carry five point five yards per carry

0:12:47.960 --> 0:12:51.199
<v Speaker 1>on the road, so McCoy is an easy A. Kelvin

0:12:51.200 --> 0:12:53.599
<v Speaker 1>Benjamin Oh, I'm tended to give him a SEA, but

0:12:53.640 --> 0:12:55.760
<v Speaker 1>I'm gonna go go bench grade here and we'll wait

0:12:55.760 --> 0:12:58.280
<v Speaker 1>and see what happens. The Saints are only allowing an

0:12:58.280 --> 0:13:00.719
<v Speaker 1>average of six catches and zero touchdown per game to

0:13:00.840 --> 0:13:03.400
<v Speaker 1>wide receivers as a whole over the past three weeks.

0:13:03.679 --> 0:13:05.520
<v Speaker 1>For that reason, I have Jordan Matthews on the bench

0:13:05.559 --> 0:13:07.880
<v Speaker 1>as well. Even though safety Kenny Vecaro will miss this

0:13:07.960 --> 0:13:10.160
<v Speaker 1>game for New Orleans, I just don't see either with

0:13:10.200 --> 0:13:12.320
<v Speaker 1>a very high ceiling in this one. And Charles Clay

0:13:12.360 --> 0:13:15.560
<v Speaker 1>is supposed to make his return. UH coach Sean McDermott say,

0:13:15.640 --> 0:13:17.600
<v Speaker 1>Clay is looking really good to play on Sunday, but

0:13:17.640 --> 0:13:20.000
<v Speaker 1>the matchup isn't right here. New Orleans has allowed these

0:13:20.040 --> 0:13:22.360
<v Speaker 1>second fewest yards to opposing tight ends, So another wait

0:13:22.360 --> 0:13:24.920
<v Speaker 1>and see scenario for Clay. Even with all those bench

0:13:24.920 --> 0:13:27.960
<v Speaker 1>grades for the past catchers, I do like Tyrod Taylor.

0:13:28.000 --> 0:13:30.200
<v Speaker 1>I'm gonna give him the B on paper. The Saints

0:13:30.240 --> 0:13:32.200
<v Speaker 1>have the best past defense in the NFL over the

0:13:32.240 --> 0:13:35.280
<v Speaker 1>last five weeks, which is but they faced Saint Yeah,

0:13:35.400 --> 0:13:40.920
<v Speaker 1>Jay Cutler, Brett Hunley, Mitch Dubitsky's still still for the

0:13:41.160 --> 0:13:43.960
<v Speaker 1>by ST standards. That's amazing. It is it truly is.

0:13:44.000 --> 0:13:46.480
<v Speaker 1>But the one legit quarterback they faced during that span

0:13:46.600 --> 0:13:48.960
<v Speaker 1>was Matthew Stafford, who threw for three d twelve yards

0:13:48.960 --> 0:13:51.920
<v Speaker 1>and three touchdowns. Taylor does have some interesting weapons, and

0:13:51.960 --> 0:13:55.079
<v Speaker 1>New Orleans has given up good numbers through rushing quarterbacks.

0:13:55.360 --> 0:13:57.480
<v Speaker 1>So uh, and I got it. Has at least six

0:13:57.600 --> 0:13:59.599
<v Speaker 1>rushing attempts in all but one game this year, and

0:13:59.640 --> 0:14:01.959
<v Speaker 1>it's schoo on the ground in consecutive weeks, So I

0:14:01.960 --> 0:14:04.440
<v Speaker 1>will give him a beef, all right. Uh. You had

0:14:04.480 --> 0:14:07.080
<v Speaker 1>mentioned Charles Clay coming back. I think a lot of

0:14:07.080 --> 0:14:11.000
<v Speaker 1>the success he had had earlier was because Jordan Matthews

0:14:11.040 --> 0:14:13.560
<v Speaker 1>was out and Zay Jones had done nothing. I mean,

0:14:13.559 --> 0:14:16.200
<v Speaker 1>there was nobody else even to throw too. Now you

0:14:16.240 --> 0:14:19.640
<v Speaker 1>add in Kelvin Benjamin, and you add in Jordan Matthews

0:14:19.640 --> 0:14:22.080
<v Speaker 1>back healthy. Now Za Jones is a bigger part of

0:14:22.080 --> 0:14:25.000
<v Speaker 1>this offense, and you know Clay is still not one.

0:14:25.760 --> 0:14:28.520
<v Speaker 1>I'm not feeling Clay right now, and I don't know

0:14:28.560 --> 0:14:31.000
<v Speaker 1>that he's going to replicate the early season success he had.

0:14:31.520 --> 0:14:35.360
<v Speaker 1>Last thing I'll mention about Kelvin Benjamin. Can you remember

0:14:35.360 --> 0:14:38.080
<v Speaker 1>another time? Can you remember any time that a receiver

0:14:38.240 --> 0:14:42.160
<v Speaker 1>was traded mid season? And then was a particularly effective

0:14:42.240 --> 0:14:47.480
<v Speaker 1>fantasy receiver with the new team. I'm struggling to think

0:14:47.480 --> 0:14:50.760
<v Speaker 1>of anybody that falls into that category. It's seven am,

0:14:50.800 --> 0:14:55.960
<v Speaker 1>I'm ever traded in the history of the NFL. Uh,

0:14:56.000 --> 0:14:58.080
<v Speaker 1>It's I just think this is I think it's a

0:14:58.120 --> 0:15:02.120
<v Speaker 1>position that it It really helps to have timing with

0:15:02.160 --> 0:15:04.720
<v Speaker 1>your quarterback, to have run all the routes together and

0:15:04.720 --> 0:15:06.640
<v Speaker 1>everything else. I just think I think it's hard for

0:15:06.680 --> 0:15:11.160
<v Speaker 1>a receiver to be particularly effective after after being traded

0:15:11.200 --> 0:15:16.560
<v Speaker 1>mid season. A lot of Marshall he was traded, but

0:15:16.560 --> 0:15:17.960
<v Speaker 1>I don't remember. I don't think it was a lot

0:15:18.000 --> 0:15:20.520
<v Speaker 1>of a lot of the Buffalo coaching staff came from

0:15:20.600 --> 0:15:23.320
<v Speaker 1>Carolina and they brought him in for a reason. They

0:15:23.400 --> 0:15:25.560
<v Speaker 1>maybe it's a good locker room guy, so he might

0:15:25.600 --> 0:15:27.720
<v Speaker 1>he might fit in pretty well there right away we

0:15:27.800 --> 0:15:30.600
<v Speaker 1>give my Ley gives points for a locker room guys. Yeah,

0:15:30.640 --> 0:15:35.360
<v Speaker 1>so yeah, that'll that'll be helpful. P L R G. Yes, Yes,

0:15:36.240 --> 0:15:38.760
<v Speaker 1>when we come back, take a chance on me. Nine

0:15:38.800 --> 0:15:40.800
<v Speaker 1>players not normally and you're starting line up a bunch

0:15:40.800 --> 0:15:43.520
<v Speaker 1>of these guys on the waiver wire. If you're in

0:15:43.560 --> 0:15:45.520
<v Speaker 1>a pinch in a position you want to stay tuned

0:15:45.640 --> 0:16:03.000
<v Speaker 1>take a chance on me when we come back. Last week,

0:16:05.040 --> 0:16:09.080
<v Speaker 1>regular listener Michael Mike Croswell was nice enough to send

0:16:09.080 --> 0:16:13.800
<v Speaker 1>in a eighties John Carpenter style take a chance on me.

0:16:14.440 --> 0:16:16.400
<v Speaker 1>We played it, and now he's come back with what

0:16:16.440 --> 0:16:20.640
<v Speaker 1>he calls the Voodoo mix. Take a chance on Me.

0:16:21.560 --> 0:16:23.760
<v Speaker 1>I kind of like it. No, it's not the Voodoo mix.

0:16:23.800 --> 0:16:26.840
<v Speaker 1>I'm sorry, it's the vote Coder mix. I looked at it.

0:16:26.960 --> 0:16:29.120
<v Speaker 1>I just glanced at it. Votal. I don't seem not

0:16:29.160 --> 0:16:32.320
<v Speaker 1>positive of the vote coder is. But we must be

0:16:32.360 --> 0:16:34.600
<v Speaker 1>listening to it. I think he knows better than we do.

0:16:34.800 --> 0:16:37.720
<v Speaker 1>Must be this fancy pants keyboard we got going to think.

0:16:37.760 --> 0:16:41.320
<v Speaker 1>So it's very eighties, it's very Cassio. Let's let's jump

0:16:41.320 --> 0:16:43.680
<v Speaker 1>into the take chance on me bit. It's uh, nine

0:16:43.680 --> 0:16:45.600
<v Speaker 1>players not normally in your starting line at the beginning

0:16:45.600 --> 0:16:47.960
<v Speaker 1>of the quarterback position. Matt, you got I said I'd

0:16:47.960 --> 0:16:50.760
<v Speaker 1>never do it, but I'm going back to the Jake Cutler. Well.

0:16:51.840 --> 0:16:54.920
<v Speaker 1>The angle here is that the j Gi E subtraction

0:16:55.240 --> 0:16:58.760
<v Speaker 1>was the addition that the Dolphins sorely needed. Both Kenyan

0:16:58.840 --> 0:17:01.320
<v Speaker 1>Drake and Damian Williams are far better pass catchers and

0:17:01.360 --> 0:17:04.520
<v Speaker 1>pass protectors than a giant, and the offense is more quick,

0:17:04.600 --> 0:17:07.640
<v Speaker 1>hitting and pass oriented now is evidenced by Cutler's first

0:17:07.720 --> 0:17:11.920
<v Speaker 1>three yard games since that happened last week. It was

0:17:11.920 --> 0:17:14.040
<v Speaker 1>also the first time he threw three touchdowns in the

0:17:14.080 --> 0:17:17.760
<v Speaker 1>last three years. He completed thirty four passes last week.

0:17:17.960 --> 0:17:22.600
<v Speaker 1>A clip that's non cutl area. No five quarterbacks have

0:17:22.680 --> 0:17:25.639
<v Speaker 1>thrown for multiple touchdowns against the Panthers, his opponent this

0:17:25.680 --> 0:17:28.360
<v Speaker 1>week in the last seven games. So let's see Cutler

0:17:28.400 --> 0:17:31.959
<v Speaker 1>do it. I'd like to see Cutler do it, all right, Brian?

0:17:32.480 --> 0:17:35.159
<v Speaker 1>How did I end up with Stu Beard? Yeah? It

0:17:35.200 --> 0:17:37.520
<v Speaker 1>doesn't seem normal, does it? Well? I got Stu Beard,

0:17:37.600 --> 0:17:41.000
<v Speaker 1>Ryan Fitzpatrick at home against the Jets in the Revenge Bowl,

0:17:41.119 --> 0:17:43.959
<v Speaker 1>which I'm sure we'll talk. This is the most revengee

0:17:43.960 --> 0:17:47.080
<v Speaker 1>game of all time? Is uh? Sadly? No, no Mike

0:17:47.119 --> 0:17:49.760
<v Speaker 1>Evans for Ryan, It's Patrick. But the Jets have still

0:17:49.800 --> 0:17:52.600
<v Speaker 1>allowed the most passing touchdowns in the NFL with nineteen.

0:17:52.920 --> 0:17:56.000
<v Speaker 1>They've allowed an opponent completion percentage of sixty eight over

0:17:56.040 --> 0:17:58.040
<v Speaker 1>the last three weeks. That is just one short of

0:17:58.080 --> 0:18:01.119
<v Speaker 1>sixty nine if you're counting at home. New York has

0:18:01.160 --> 0:18:04.640
<v Speaker 1>also allowed multiple passing touchdowns in five straight games. So yeah,

0:18:04.760 --> 0:18:07.560
<v Speaker 1>Stu Beard. In an obvious revenge scenario, let's go. Josh

0:18:07.640 --> 0:18:12.760
<v Speaker 1>McCown might be the safest quarterback play this week. Also

0:18:12.960 --> 0:18:15.679
<v Speaker 1>now the Revenge Bowl. It's that's the other half of

0:18:15.680 --> 0:18:19.360
<v Speaker 1>Revenge Bowl. No two quarterbacks have ever faced each other

0:18:19.440 --> 0:18:22.840
<v Speaker 1>having played for more combined teams in the course of

0:18:22.840 --> 0:18:28.720
<v Speaker 1>their career than Josh McCown and Ryan Fitzpatrick. McCowen scored

0:18:28.800 --> 0:18:32.399
<v Speaker 1>multiple touchdowns in five straight games, and this is his

0:18:32.520 --> 0:18:34.840
<v Speaker 1>easiest opponent of the year, Tampa Bay. The Bucks ranked

0:18:34.920 --> 0:18:37.880
<v Speaker 1>thirtie and past defense giving up tutor eighty yards per game.

0:18:38.359 --> 0:18:42.920
<v Speaker 1>Opposing quarterbacks have scored in every game against the Bucks.

0:18:43.560 --> 0:18:47.080
<v Speaker 1>It's a terrific opportunity for Josh McCown to go to

0:18:47.119 --> 0:18:50.320
<v Speaker 1>the running back position. Matt, I've got Rod Smith. And

0:18:50.400 --> 0:18:54.159
<v Speaker 1>this is predicated on Ezekiel Elliott's suspension actually staying a

0:18:54.240 --> 0:18:57.479
<v Speaker 1>suspension this week. I think it's going to stay. Exchange

0:18:57.560 --> 0:19:01.280
<v Speaker 1>between now and kickoff. Atlanta, their opponent this week has

0:19:01.280 --> 0:19:04.280
<v Speaker 1>allowed the fourth most receptions to opposing running backs, and

0:19:04.359 --> 0:19:06.880
<v Speaker 1>good pass catching backs tend to have a decent day

0:19:06.880 --> 0:19:10.640
<v Speaker 1>against the Falcons. Christian McCaffrey had five catches last week

0:19:10.640 --> 0:19:13.240
<v Speaker 1>and ended up scoring on the ground. Matt Forte add

0:19:13.359 --> 0:19:16.120
<v Speaker 1>six for forty five in the air. James White had

0:19:16.119 --> 0:19:19.640
<v Speaker 1>five catches and scored time Montgomery six for seventy five

0:19:19.680 --> 0:19:22.440
<v Speaker 1>in a touch. Tarik Cohen eight for forty seven and

0:19:22.520 --> 0:19:25.159
<v Speaker 1>a touch. Rod Smith's their pass catching back. I like

0:19:25.240 --> 0:19:28.800
<v Speaker 1>him this week, all right, Ryan, I've got Cleveland's Duke

0:19:28.880 --> 0:19:32.240
<v Speaker 1>Johnson at Detroit. Opposing running backs are averaging more than

0:19:32.280 --> 0:19:35.200
<v Speaker 1>eight targets per game against the Lions, so it'snow surprise

0:19:35.280 --> 0:19:38.000
<v Speaker 1>Detroit is top twelve and receptions and yards allowed to

0:19:38.119 --> 0:19:41.280
<v Speaker 1>running backs. Duke has ten catches on twelve targets over

0:19:41.280 --> 0:19:45.080
<v Speaker 1>his last two games. Cleveland wide receivers are absolutely worthless.

0:19:45.280 --> 0:19:46.760
<v Speaker 1>I see a lot of volume through the air for

0:19:46.880 --> 0:19:50.119
<v Speaker 1>Duke in this one. Or Lean's Dark wa is my choice.

0:19:50.200 --> 0:19:52.560
<v Speaker 1>Now this is a two parter. It's also Wayne Gallman,

0:19:52.920 --> 0:19:56.280
<v Speaker 1>so I'll let you do the choosing listener on whether

0:19:56.520 --> 0:19:59.119
<v Speaker 1>Poor Lean's Dark Wall or Wayne Gollman is more applicable

0:19:59.160 --> 0:20:02.080
<v Speaker 1>for your situation. Ship probably can't find Orleans Dark one

0:20:02.080 --> 0:20:04.199
<v Speaker 1>on a lot of waiver. That's right, So and I

0:20:04.280 --> 0:20:06.800
<v Speaker 1>Wayne Goldman, there's enough to go around. Let's let's talk

0:20:06.840 --> 0:20:09.960
<v Speaker 1>about it. Forty Niners ranked thirty feet against the run,

0:20:10.760 --> 0:20:14.320
<v Speaker 1>mostly because teams are running thirty six times per game

0:20:14.359 --> 0:20:17.960
<v Speaker 1>against San Francisco. Now, the of the thirty six times,

0:20:18.440 --> 0:20:21.359
<v Speaker 1>Orleans Dark has never had more than sixteen carries in

0:20:21.400 --> 0:20:24.879
<v Speaker 1>a game this year, so that leaves twenty carries to

0:20:24.920 --> 0:20:27.119
<v Speaker 1>get spread around. They're all going to Wayne Goldman. They

0:20:27.200 --> 0:20:31.640
<v Speaker 1>might all go to Wayne Goldman, and especially if the Giants, Brian,

0:20:32.280 --> 0:20:35.199
<v Speaker 1>are able to reverse last week's blowout and be on

0:20:35.240 --> 0:20:37.560
<v Speaker 1>the other end of a blowout win against the windless

0:20:37.600 --> 0:20:41.080
<v Speaker 1>forty Niners, maybe then they go to their backup running

0:20:41.080 --> 0:20:43.640
<v Speaker 1>back Wayne Goldman and give him a bunch of work. Meanwhile,

0:20:43.720 --> 0:20:48.680
<v Speaker 1>Orleans Orleans Dark wavaging five yards per carry, So we're

0:20:48.680 --> 0:20:51.800
<v Speaker 1>excited about the prospects of both. I'm sure will do

0:20:51.840 --> 0:20:56.439
<v Speaker 1>the right thing. Retire. Did Charch just find a barber

0:20:56.520 --> 0:21:00.119
<v Speaker 1>blowout game flow for the Giants? I did? Wow? How

0:21:00.160 --> 0:21:03.280
<v Speaker 1>about that? Brian? Sorry, Matt, let's go to the wide

0:21:03.280 --> 0:21:05.760
<v Speaker 1>receiver slash tight end of position. I've got a tight

0:21:05.880 --> 0:21:08.480
<v Speaker 1>end and it's Garrett Sellec. Because it's almost too easy.

0:21:08.560 --> 0:21:12.000
<v Speaker 1>It's the Giants that they're playing and everyone knows that

0:21:12.080 --> 0:21:14.160
<v Speaker 1>they suck against tight ends, to the tune that they've

0:21:14.160 --> 0:21:17.800
<v Speaker 1>allowed a tight end touchdown every game this season. And

0:21:18.440 --> 0:21:21.679
<v Speaker 1>George Kittle, the normal starting tight end, is out. So

0:21:21.800 --> 0:21:25.320
<v Speaker 1>Garrett Sellek, who's virtually unowned in any league, is sitting

0:21:25.320 --> 0:21:28.879
<v Speaker 1>there with the best tight end matchup of all of

0:21:28.920 --> 0:21:32.199
<v Speaker 1>all time, of all time. It's I mean, if you

0:21:32.240 --> 0:21:34.320
<v Speaker 1>were to look just at the defensive part of it,

0:21:34.320 --> 0:21:37.399
<v Speaker 1>it probably is the best tight end matchup of all time.

0:21:37.440 --> 0:21:40.840
<v Speaker 1>I'm confident in the twenty three year history of this show,

0:21:41.240 --> 0:21:44.240
<v Speaker 1>we've never had a team rolling on a ten game

0:21:44.400 --> 0:21:48.840
<v Speaker 1>tight end touchdown a loud streak ever, correct, Bryan, all right,

0:21:48.880 --> 0:21:51.040
<v Speaker 1>let's stay with tight ends, and I'm going with Houston.

0:21:51.160 --> 0:21:54.560
<v Speaker 1>C jt Dorwitz at the Rams. CJ is coming off

0:21:54.640 --> 0:21:57.360
<v Speaker 1>i R after suffering a concussion in week one. He's

0:21:57.359 --> 0:22:01.439
<v Speaker 1>expected to quote play a lot. So that's good news, uh,

0:22:02.000 --> 0:22:05.440
<v Speaker 1>and then their story three game history together. C J

0:22:05.600 --> 0:22:08.399
<v Speaker 1>Fedorowit's and Tom Savage are a duo more deadly than

0:22:08.480 --> 0:22:11.080
<v Speaker 1>Dalton and Wade, whoa also a great place to grab

0:22:11.080 --> 0:22:13.280
<v Speaker 1>an old fashioned had the well I do like that place.

0:22:13.400 --> 0:22:16.720
<v Speaker 1>But anyways, CJ caught four passes for forty six yards

0:22:16.760 --> 0:22:19.040
<v Speaker 1>for forty six yards from Savage in Week one before

0:22:19.040 --> 0:22:21.639
<v Speaker 1>getting hurt early in the third quarter. Last year, he

0:22:21.720 --> 0:22:23.720
<v Speaker 1>was the only Texan receiver to see at least seven

0:22:23.760 --> 0:22:27.480
<v Speaker 1>targets in both of Savages starts. So he's his favorite option.

0:22:27.800 --> 0:22:29.960
<v Speaker 1>And I'll see lots of volume on Sunday against the Rimps,

0:22:30.040 --> 0:22:32.760
<v Speaker 1>and he's going to play a lot and play quote

0:22:32.920 --> 0:22:37.439
<v Speaker 1>a lot market down. Never have more ringing endorsement. I

0:22:37.480 --> 0:22:42.040
<v Speaker 1>am going with Tampa Bay receiver Adam Humphries. Evans is out.

0:22:42.200 --> 0:22:44.200
<v Speaker 1>Tom fres is going to get more targets. But even

0:22:44.200 --> 0:22:48.240
<v Speaker 1>more importantly, he faces Buster Screen, who ranks nineties or

0:22:48.280 --> 0:22:51.440
<v Speaker 1>Busted Screen doors we'd like to call him, or we've

0:22:51.480 --> 0:22:53.879
<v Speaker 1>called him Custer Screen as well. We've been picking on

0:22:54.080 --> 0:22:58.600
<v Speaker 1>Fuster Screen for year. Absolutely ranks seven at the cornerback

0:22:58.640 --> 0:23:01.840
<v Speaker 1>position by Pro Football. Folks. Get this, The last three

0:23:01.840 --> 0:23:05.000
<v Speaker 1>slot receivers to face the Jets and Screen all have

0:23:05.280 --> 0:23:08.280
<v Speaker 1>all score touchdowns and they've all topped seventy four yards.

0:23:09.000 --> 0:23:11.840
<v Speaker 1>That's a liability in the defense we can exploit, folks.

0:23:11.880 --> 0:23:18.160
<v Speaker 1>Adam Humble, Adam Humphries gets the screen pass. That's right. Uh,

0:23:18.160 --> 0:23:20.440
<v Speaker 1>We'll take a break when we come back. More matchups

0:23:20.440 --> 0:23:23.320
<v Speaker 1>to get to, including Chargers taking on the Jaguars. Do

0:23:23.359 --> 0:23:27.639
<v Speaker 1>you dare start anybody from the passing game from San Diego?

0:23:27.720 --> 0:23:31.200
<v Speaker 1>Find out when we come back. You're distinct of Fantasy

0:23:31.280 --> 0:23:43.080
<v Speaker 1>Football Weekly on the Fan. Welcome back to the show.

0:23:43.080 --> 0:23:46.000
<v Speaker 1>It is Fantasy Football Weekly on the Fan. Paul Church

0:23:46.080 --> 0:23:48.840
<v Speaker 1>and Brian Johnson, Matt Harrison with you. We're in a

0:23:48.960 --> 0:23:51.040
<v Speaker 1>roll up our sleeves on a bunch of matchups and

0:23:51.359 --> 0:23:53.040
<v Speaker 1>try to work in maybe a call or two to

0:23:53.119 --> 0:23:55.720
<v Speaker 1>the people nice enough to sit on hold and listen

0:23:55.760 --> 0:24:02.639
<v Speaker 1>through the show. First matchup, it's the Chargers against the Jaguars.

0:24:02.760 --> 0:24:07.120
<v Speaker 1>Jaguars rank number one against the pass They've given up

0:24:07.400 --> 0:24:12.280
<v Speaker 1>one passing touchdown in their last five games, not one

0:24:12.400 --> 0:24:16.439
<v Speaker 1>per game, one passing touchdown in their last five games.

0:24:16.840 --> 0:24:18.880
<v Speaker 1>That means if you spread that out over season, they're

0:24:18.920 --> 0:24:22.399
<v Speaker 1>gonna they're averaging like three point two passing touchdowns on

0:24:22.520 --> 0:24:25.639
<v Speaker 1>the season. That is correct for the Jaguars. Can you

0:24:25.680 --> 0:24:29.399
<v Speaker 1>possibly start any of your Chargers no the passing games

0:24:29.440 --> 0:24:32.200
<v Speaker 1>on the bench, and that includes Philip Rivers and Keenan Allen.

0:24:32.720 --> 0:24:35.280
<v Speaker 1>The Jags have only allowed one touchdown to a wide

0:24:35.280 --> 0:24:37.439
<v Speaker 1>receiver all year. That was way back in Week one

0:24:37.480 --> 0:24:40.679
<v Speaker 1>against DeAndre Hopkins, so Allen's not in play. Hunter Henry

0:24:40.720 --> 0:24:43.119
<v Speaker 1>as the best matchup, as the Jags have allowed three

0:24:43.320 --> 0:24:46.280
<v Speaker 1>times as many touchdowns to tight ends as wide receivers.

0:24:46.680 --> 0:24:49.359
<v Speaker 1>That would be three uh, but Henry's the target totals

0:24:49.359 --> 0:24:51.639
<v Speaker 1>have just been erratic seven five and two in the

0:24:51.680 --> 0:24:54.000
<v Speaker 1>last three games. The only guy to start on the

0:24:54.040 --> 0:24:56.280
<v Speaker 1>Charger side is Melvin Gordon, who gets an A. Through

0:24:56.320 --> 0:24:59.000
<v Speaker 1>their first six games, the Jaguars have allowed six backs

0:24:59.040 --> 0:25:02.440
<v Speaker 1>to top nine dr three of them hit triple digits,

0:25:02.480 --> 0:25:05.600
<v Speaker 1>and they they only held the Colts and Bengals backfields

0:25:05.640 --> 0:25:07.720
<v Speaker 1>under those marks in the last two weeks. But that's

0:25:07.760 --> 0:25:11.560
<v Speaker 1>as impressive as Don Trump maxing out a two character

0:25:11.640 --> 0:25:15.719
<v Speaker 1>tweet right there. Let's go to the Jaguar side. Leonard

0:25:15.720 --> 0:25:18.080
<v Speaker 1>four Nette. He gets an A grade. He hasn't played

0:25:18.080 --> 0:25:20.440
<v Speaker 1>in three weeks due to injury, then a buy, then

0:25:20.480 --> 0:25:23.520
<v Speaker 1>a team photo. The prior three weeks he was averaging

0:25:23.560 --> 0:25:25.680
<v Speaker 1>a hundred and fifty five total yards and one point

0:25:25.720 --> 0:25:28.159
<v Speaker 1>three touchdowns per game, and the Chargers are allowing a

0:25:28.240 --> 0:25:30.560
<v Speaker 1>hundred and thirty five yards per game to running backs.

0:25:30.600 --> 0:25:32.919
<v Speaker 1>That's second worst in the league. So he's the A.

0:25:33.280 --> 0:25:36.480
<v Speaker 1>But the passing games on the bench Blake Bortles uh.

0:25:36.520 --> 0:25:38.960
<v Speaker 1>The Chargers have held five of eight quarterbacks to one

0:25:39.119 --> 0:25:41.720
<v Speaker 1>or zero touchdown passes this season. Tom Brady is the

0:25:41.720 --> 0:25:45.040
<v Speaker 1>only one to top to fifty against the Chargers. Marquis

0:25:45.119 --> 0:25:46.879
<v Speaker 1>Lee is on the bench. He's the only wide receiver

0:25:46.960 --> 0:25:49.639
<v Speaker 1>has been worth anything on this roster. There's a remote

0:25:49.640 --> 0:25:52.320
<v Speaker 1>possibility that we could see D. D. Westbrook soon. But

0:25:52.440 --> 0:25:55.560
<v Speaker 1>Marquis Lee draws Casey Hayward, who's only allowed eight teen

0:25:55.640 --> 0:26:01.160
<v Speaker 1>catches this season to per game. So that's it, nicely done.

0:26:01.520 --> 0:26:03.399
<v Speaker 1>Did I hit the minute mark? I wasn't timeing? He

0:26:03.440 --> 0:26:05.280
<v Speaker 1>thought you were gonna time me. No, you didn't say

0:26:05.280 --> 0:26:08.040
<v Speaker 1>you wanted to be time Do you want to be timed? Brian?

0:26:09.280 --> 0:26:11.840
<v Speaker 1>I mean I can work this out if you'd like. Uh.

0:26:11.960 --> 0:26:14.679
<v Speaker 1>Cleveland takes on the Detroit Lions. Can you do that

0:26:14.720 --> 0:26:17.200
<v Speaker 1>in one minute? Yes? Or no? On your market set?

0:26:17.280 --> 0:26:21.320
<v Speaker 1>Go h I say that, I say, crow L, I'm

0:26:21.320 --> 0:26:23.200
<v Speaker 1>gonna give him a seat. Now. This is way too

0:26:23.280 --> 0:26:27.160
<v Speaker 1>distract you gotta do it, um uh cro L. What's

0:26:27.160 --> 0:26:30.760
<v Speaker 1>finally useful from a fan? It's I can't do this? Yes,

0:26:31.400 --> 0:26:34.240
<v Speaker 1>our thirty second reviewers do it all the time. All right,

0:26:34.359 --> 0:26:36.440
<v Speaker 1>it's a bad matchup for crow l. Detroit is right

0:26:36.520 --> 0:26:39.040
<v Speaker 1>top ten against the run by Football Outsiders d v

0:26:39.240 --> 0:26:41.720
<v Speaker 1>o A and only two running backs up topped seventy

0:26:41.760 --> 0:26:46.080
<v Speaker 1>six yards against the Lions. Uh, they're much easier thrown

0:26:46.160 --> 0:26:49.440
<v Speaker 1>off right now. Taking is like, I feel like the

0:26:49.480 --> 0:26:52.520
<v Speaker 1>place is gonna explode. Um, I like do Johnson more

0:26:52.560 --> 0:26:54.239
<v Speaker 1>than that? I say crow wel that's plays. Might take

0:26:54.240 --> 0:26:56.840
<v Speaker 1>a chance on me running back. The wide receivers are

0:26:56.840 --> 0:26:59.520
<v Speaker 1>on the bench. Over the last three games, six Cleveland

0:26:59.600 --> 0:27:02.000
<v Speaker 1>wide receive eivers have combined for twenty three catches and

0:27:02.040 --> 0:27:04.520
<v Speaker 1>two forty nine yards. That's not even an average of

0:27:04.600 --> 0:27:06.800
<v Speaker 1>eight catches and eighty five yards per game for the

0:27:06.840 --> 0:27:10.000
<v Speaker 1>whole unit. They're just dreadful. And Joku, David and Joeku

0:27:10.080 --> 0:27:12.480
<v Speaker 1>was on the bench. Decent matchup for tight ends, but

0:27:12.520 --> 0:27:14.159
<v Speaker 1>in Joko has got the top three catches in the

0:27:14.200 --> 0:27:16.840
<v Speaker 1>game and has preached the fifty yard mark just once. Uh,

0:27:18.040 --> 0:27:19.840
<v Speaker 1>you didn't even get through half of the matchup in

0:27:19.960 --> 0:27:26.160
<v Speaker 1>sixty seconds. That was nerve racking. He would never make

0:27:26.200 --> 0:27:28.639
<v Speaker 1>it on Video Games Weekly. That's what I've learned here.

0:27:28.720 --> 0:27:30.640
<v Speaker 1>You have to tell me that the tik tiking was coming.

0:27:30.680 --> 0:27:33.119
<v Speaker 1>I wasn't prepared for that. You are a radio professional.

0:27:33.600 --> 0:27:36.000
<v Speaker 1>You are paid to execute this show. We expect you

0:27:36.080 --> 0:27:37.560
<v Speaker 1>to be able to do it with a ticking sound

0:27:37.600 --> 0:27:39.840
<v Speaker 1>in the background. You could have just taken off the headphones.

0:27:40.240 --> 0:27:41.520
<v Speaker 1>I don't think I'm paid enough to do it with

0:27:41.600 --> 0:27:44.280
<v Speaker 1>the ticking sound in the background. That's too hard. DeShone

0:27:44.320 --> 0:27:47.800
<v Speaker 1>geyser on the bench. Okay, over to Detroit. Golden eight,

0:27:47.880 --> 0:27:50.560
<v Speaker 1>gonna get eight Golden Tate, canna give him an a?

0:27:50.680 --> 0:27:53.240
<v Speaker 1>I am so on tilt right now. Tate his top

0:27:53.320 --> 0:27:55.960
<v Speaker 1>ten and receiving yards among wide receivers. You're obviously starting

0:27:56.040 --> 0:27:59.320
<v Speaker 1>him against the Browns. Marvin Jones almost want to give

0:27:59.359 --> 0:28:00.920
<v Speaker 1>him an a. It wasn't for the fact that he'll

0:28:01.000 --> 0:28:04.080
<v Speaker 1>draw a top cover corner. Jason mccordy Jones one of

0:28:04.119 --> 0:28:06.000
<v Speaker 1>my one of my sleepers in the preseason. By the way,

0:28:06.040 --> 0:28:07.879
<v Speaker 1>if you want to fire up that peacock if he's awake.

0:28:08.320 --> 0:28:10.840
<v Speaker 1>Over the last four weeks, Jones is fourth among wide

0:28:10.840 --> 0:28:13.679
<v Speaker 1>receivers and yards and first in touchdowns. That's even more

0:28:13.720 --> 0:28:19.320
<v Speaker 1>impressive considering he had his by during that span. Uh now, right,

0:28:19.359 --> 0:28:20.920
<v Speaker 1>now you don't mind, you don't mind talking to the

0:28:20.960 --> 0:28:24.280
<v Speaker 1>peacock sound when it's all about you. I'm so used

0:28:24.320 --> 0:28:27.760
<v Speaker 1>to that. Okay, that's true. Alright, uh man, there's a

0:28:27.840 --> 0:28:29.680
<v Speaker 1>certain tight end I really want to mention in this

0:28:29.800 --> 0:28:34.879
<v Speaker 1>matchup for Detroit. Can I know Darren Fells? Believe you

0:28:34.920 --> 0:28:38.560
<v Speaker 1>had Darren Fells doubly It's it's it's I'm not recommending

0:28:38.640 --> 0:28:40.560
<v Speaker 1>him in seasonal he's started a standard bench. But on

0:28:40.600 --> 0:28:42.320
<v Speaker 1>a site like fan ball where he's coming in cheap.

0:28:42.400 --> 0:28:46.240
<v Speaker 1>Oh yeah, Ebron against the Browns, I would use Fanballs

0:28:46.360 --> 0:28:49.560
<v Speaker 1>triple tight end set to get Ebron, no doubt, no doubt.

0:28:49.960 --> 0:28:53.840
<v Speaker 1>Matt Stafful, idiot, Matt Stafford. Want to do a head

0:28:53.880 --> 0:28:56.959
<v Speaker 1>to head? Yes, all right, you have to use Ebron

0:28:57.080 --> 0:28:59.800
<v Speaker 1>and your triple tight end stack. Deal, all right, decent

0:28:59.880 --> 0:29:02.600
<v Speaker 1>you link later, Matt Stafford. Gonna give him in a

0:29:02.880 --> 0:29:05.880
<v Speaker 1>Cleveland has allowed sixteen passing touchdowns on the season, which

0:29:05.960 --> 0:29:07.840
<v Speaker 1>is tied for third most in the league. Stafford has

0:29:07.880 --> 0:29:09.520
<v Speaker 1>thrown for three or more yards in each of the

0:29:09.640 --> 0:29:11.920
<v Speaker 1>last three games. He's an easy a. I'm here to abdul.

0:29:11.960 --> 0:29:13.800
<v Speaker 1>I'm just gonna give him a CE fumbled in some

0:29:13.920 --> 0:29:15.960
<v Speaker 1>key spots last week. It's hard to trust him in

0:29:16.000 --> 0:29:19.080
<v Speaker 1>fantasy and now reality. Cleveland has actually ranked number one

0:29:19.080 --> 0:29:21.320
<v Speaker 1>against the run by Football Outsiders, and it's not because

0:29:21.360 --> 0:29:23.960
<v Speaker 1>teams aren't running against them. They are top twelve and

0:29:24.040 --> 0:29:27.280
<v Speaker 1>carries against, but bottom five and yards allowed. That means

0:29:27.320 --> 0:29:29.240
<v Speaker 1>they are a legit run defense. So I'm not liking

0:29:29.280 --> 0:29:32.080
<v Speaker 1>to Abdula here and THEO Rittic I still can't do it.

0:29:32.200 --> 0:29:34.440
<v Speaker 1>He's on the bench as well. He's basically been benchable

0:29:34.480 --> 0:29:37.360
<v Speaker 1>all year. You might as well start THEO huxable at

0:29:37.400 --> 0:29:45.080
<v Speaker 1>this point. That was very impressive. I came right off

0:29:45.080 --> 0:29:47.520
<v Speaker 1>the top of the head. Really, I can't tell you

0:29:47.600 --> 0:29:50.360
<v Speaker 1>didn't put hours and hours of work out of that. Uh.

0:29:50.600 --> 0:29:53.800
<v Speaker 1>The yards per carry Cleveland is still number one in

0:29:53.880 --> 0:29:57.280
<v Speaker 1>opposing yards per carry at two point nine. That's it.

0:29:57.800 --> 0:30:00.760
<v Speaker 1>They are sneaky good run defense. Giants take on the

0:30:00.840 --> 0:30:04.400
<v Speaker 1>forty niners already told you Orleans Darkwa and Wayne Goldman.

0:30:04.440 --> 0:30:06.680
<v Speaker 1>Where my code take a chance on me running backs.

0:30:06.720 --> 0:30:08.280
<v Speaker 1>I want to see you do this with the ticking.

0:30:08.760 --> 0:30:12.120
<v Speaker 1>Come on, do you think that's gonna phase a seasoned

0:30:12.240 --> 0:30:15.600
<v Speaker 1>radio like? Yeah, it doesn't mean I don't think I

0:30:15.640 --> 0:30:17.120
<v Speaker 1>can get the matchup in under one minute. But I

0:30:17.160 --> 0:30:20.160
<v Speaker 1>didn't say I could. All right, let's go to the

0:30:20.240 --> 0:30:22.600
<v Speaker 1>passing game. After a nice start to the season, the

0:30:23.320 --> 0:30:26.440
<v Speaker 1>defenses regressed badly in their last seven games. They've allowed

0:30:26.520 --> 0:30:30.640
<v Speaker 1>either multiple touchdown passes or more than three hundred passing

0:30:30.720 --> 0:30:33.200
<v Speaker 1>yards in every game. And here's Eli Manning who comes

0:30:33.240 --> 0:30:35.520
<v Speaker 1>in short handed for a month. He's played all these

0:30:35.560 --> 0:30:38.600
<v Speaker 1>good defenses, yet he's still thrown at least one touchdown

0:30:38.680 --> 0:30:40.520
<v Speaker 1>in every game since the opener. And this is the

0:30:40.560 --> 0:30:43.520
<v Speaker 1>easiest matchup since Week four when he faced Tampa and

0:30:43.600 --> 0:30:46.000
<v Speaker 1>he rolled up two yards and two scores and that one.

0:30:46.200 --> 0:30:49.400
<v Speaker 1>So I like Eli Manning. A B grade on Eli Manning,

0:30:49.600 --> 0:30:51.760
<v Speaker 1>And if I like Manning means I like his really

0:30:51.840 --> 0:30:55.800
<v Speaker 1>only two receiving options first, Sterling Shepherd. He was targeted

0:30:55.920 --> 0:31:00.080
<v Speaker 1>nine times last week nin and the Giants don't have

0:31:00.080 --> 0:31:01.840
<v Speaker 1>a lot of other options in the passing game. Only

0:31:01.920 --> 0:31:05.000
<v Speaker 1>two teams have allowed more passing touchdowns than the forty

0:31:05.080 --> 0:31:09.360
<v Speaker 1>Niners and their slot corner Kwan Williams, who will be

0:31:09.440 --> 0:31:15.280
<v Speaker 1>guarding Shepherd, primarily ranks as cornerback one hundred twelve by

0:31:15.360 --> 0:31:19.720
<v Speaker 1>Pro Football Focus. I believe one fifteen is the total

0:31:19.880 --> 0:31:25.880
<v Speaker 1>number that they've got. Evan Ingram isn't a great and

0:31:25.920 --> 0:31:27.920
<v Speaker 1>by the way, Shepherds will be great. A grade for

0:31:27.960 --> 0:31:30.280
<v Speaker 1>Evan Ingram on the season, the forty nine is are

0:31:30.280 --> 0:31:32.720
<v Speaker 1>a top ten defensive against tight ends, but they've given

0:31:32.800 --> 0:31:35.440
<v Speaker 1>up a touchdown to the position in three straight weeks.

0:31:35.480 --> 0:31:38.200
<v Speaker 1>And here comes Ingram who has scored a touchdown in

0:31:38.400 --> 0:31:43.440
<v Speaker 1>three straight weeks. He's averaging nine targets nine times over

0:31:43.480 --> 0:31:45.400
<v Speaker 1>the last five weeks and that is not going to

0:31:45.520 --> 0:31:48.080
<v Speaker 1>change here. Let's go to the San Francisco side. You

0:31:48.160 --> 0:31:51.120
<v Speaker 1>gotta be great in Carlos High, averaging over eighteen touches

0:31:51.160 --> 0:31:53.000
<v Speaker 1>per game, and he'll get the bulk of the work

0:31:53.000 --> 0:31:55.760
<v Speaker 1>against the Giants, who ranked twenty four and rushing yards allowed,

0:31:55.960 --> 0:31:59.600
<v Speaker 1>and they've given up over one hundred fifteen total yards

0:31:59.640 --> 0:32:05.120
<v Speaker 1>to back in every single game this season. Nine. That

0:32:05.280 --> 0:32:08.720
<v Speaker 1>is right, That's exactly right. Uh. Matt Breed is just

0:32:08.800 --> 0:32:11.200
<v Speaker 1>an afterthought in this offense now. And I've actually got

0:32:11.320 --> 0:32:14.200
<v Speaker 1>some C grades on the passing game, because Brian, your

0:32:14.240 --> 0:32:17.080
<v Speaker 1>giants stink against the past all of a sudden, all

0:32:17.120 --> 0:32:20.280
<v Speaker 1>of a sudden. Other than that part, uh C J.

0:32:20.440 --> 0:32:23.920
<v Speaker 1>Bethard C grade, he's his rushing prowess helps make him

0:32:23.960 --> 0:32:27.320
<v Speaker 1>a plausible by week fill and he's averaging thirty rushing

0:32:27.400 --> 0:32:29.600
<v Speaker 1>yards per game. On the ground, he scored twice in

0:32:29.640 --> 0:32:32.280
<v Speaker 1>the in three full games. But his arm can ship

0:32:32.360 --> 0:32:33.960
<v Speaker 1>in a little something here too. The Giants have allowed

0:32:34.120 --> 0:32:38.920
<v Speaker 1>multiple passing touchdowns or three passing yards and five consecutive

0:32:38.960 --> 0:32:42.920
<v Speaker 1>games rolling into this one. And during that stretch, quarterbacks

0:32:42.960 --> 0:32:47.480
<v Speaker 1>have averaged just under three touchdowns per game. So even

0:32:47.520 --> 0:32:50.200
<v Speaker 1>if c J. Bethard is half that good, that's one

0:32:50.240 --> 0:32:53.280
<v Speaker 1>and a half touchdowns. We'll we'll take that. That earns

0:32:53.320 --> 0:32:57.080
<v Speaker 1>you a C grade around here. Since week four, the

0:32:57.160 --> 0:33:00.200
<v Speaker 1>Giants are the NFL's worst past defense. So CJ about

0:33:00.280 --> 0:33:03.600
<v Speaker 1>Room of the Sea, and then you mentioned Gerrit's Garrett

0:33:03.600 --> 0:33:05.880
<v Speaker 1>Sellek was you take a chance on your receiver slash

0:33:05.960 --> 0:33:08.200
<v Speaker 1>tight end? And then Markus God is the only the

0:33:08.240 --> 0:33:10.280
<v Speaker 1>guy with a pulse. He gets a C grade as well.

0:33:10.760 --> 0:33:13.480
<v Speaker 1>Since c J. Bethard took over, goodwin leads to forty

0:33:13.560 --> 0:33:16.760
<v Speaker 1>niners and targets he had eight last week. Of course,

0:33:16.880 --> 0:33:20.560
<v Speaker 1>Pierre Garsona's out, the Giants get to North Jenkins back

0:33:20.680 --> 0:33:22.920
<v Speaker 1>from suspension team and duce suspension. What do you do

0:33:23.040 --> 0:33:24.920
<v Speaker 1>by the way giant, do we, Brian, what do you

0:33:25.160 --> 0:33:27.239
<v Speaker 1>we know? What he did? Uh? He laughed at Ben

0:33:27.360 --> 0:33:30.240
<v Speaker 1>mcadoo's hair. Do so suspend? And then apparently I'm gonna

0:33:30.240 --> 0:33:34.040
<v Speaker 1>get suspended? Don't you know? I would say that he

0:33:34.440 --> 0:33:37.880
<v Speaker 1>Uh he besmirched the integrity of Ben mcadoo's barber. But

0:33:38.160 --> 0:33:42.040
<v Speaker 1>Benmark mcadoo's barber is a Tupperware bowl, so he probably didn't.

0:33:43.200 --> 0:33:45.200
<v Speaker 1>They have a lot five wide receiver touchdowns in the

0:33:45.280 --> 0:33:48.000
<v Speaker 1>last two games. Your Giants have in seven wide receivers

0:33:48.040 --> 0:33:50.160
<v Speaker 1>have hit at least fifty yards in the last three weeks.

0:33:50.240 --> 0:33:53.160
<v Speaker 1>Think about that, three games, seven different receivers have hit

0:33:53.200 --> 0:33:56.120
<v Speaker 1>fifty yards. Goodwin is going to do that? There's Uh,

0:33:56.640 --> 0:33:59.760
<v Speaker 1>he remains a C grade. I think we had time

0:33:59.760 --> 0:34:01.320
<v Speaker 1>to time for one more. Let me look at our time,

0:34:01.360 --> 0:34:04.400
<v Speaker 1>our clock kind of I got this, all right? You

0:34:04.480 --> 0:34:08.480
<v Speaker 1>think you can do Steelers colts reasonably reasonably quickly? Maybe

0:34:08.600 --> 0:34:11.120
<v Speaker 1>all right? Uh, you don't want to commit to anything,

0:34:11.120 --> 0:34:15.480
<v Speaker 1>I understand. Levan Bell is this week's fantasy Fonzie, Right,

0:34:15.560 --> 0:34:20.399
<v Speaker 1>Brian the easiest day of them all? Uh. Antonio Brown

0:34:20.480 --> 0:34:23.200
<v Speaker 1>also in a last year on Thanksgiving against Vante Davis,

0:34:23.239 --> 0:34:25.640
<v Speaker 1>Brown had nine yards and three touchdowns. But there's no

0:34:25.719 --> 0:34:29.239
<v Speaker 1>more Vante Davis Juju smith Schuster. He's getting a b.

0:34:29.440 --> 0:34:31.680
<v Speaker 1>Juju got his driver's license in the bye week after

0:34:31.800 --> 0:34:34.000
<v Speaker 1>torching the Lions for a hundred and ninety three yards

0:34:34.040 --> 0:34:36.680
<v Speaker 1>in a touchdown. Before the bye, the Colts have allowed

0:34:36.719 --> 0:34:39.320
<v Speaker 1>the most yards in the NFL to opposing wide receivers,

0:34:39.640 --> 0:34:42.680
<v Speaker 1>and they've allowed a league high forty four completions of

0:34:42.760 --> 0:34:46.320
<v Speaker 1>twenty yards or more. So Smith Schusters would be almost

0:34:46.360 --> 0:34:49.120
<v Speaker 1>went to Martavis Bryant, but I have him on the bench.

0:34:49.560 --> 0:34:52.200
<v Speaker 1>He hasn't topped fifty yards since Week two, and he

0:34:52.280 --> 0:34:54.680
<v Speaker 1>could say something stupid at any time and get benched

0:34:54.680 --> 0:34:57.279
<v Speaker 1>halfway through the game, maybe on Instagram during the game

0:34:57.440 --> 0:35:02.359
<v Speaker 1>about how lousy Juju smith Schuster probably um Ben Roethlisberger.

0:35:02.400 --> 0:35:04.200
<v Speaker 1>I gotta be on him. Three of the last five

0:35:04.280 --> 0:35:07.160
<v Speaker 1>quarterbacks to face the Colts of top three yards but

0:35:07.320 --> 0:35:10.399
<v Speaker 1>no quarterbacks top two touchdowns against Indie this year. It's

0:35:10.400 --> 0:35:12.520
<v Speaker 1>pretty easy to run on them and they don't need

0:35:12.600 --> 0:35:14.640
<v Speaker 1>to pass that much to the game flow. Could have

0:35:14.760 --> 0:35:18.080
<v Speaker 1>Levian Bell touch on the ball thirty times plus over

0:35:18.200 --> 0:35:20.400
<v Speaker 1>on the Colt side. It's a bench festival. T Y

0:35:20.520 --> 0:35:22.560
<v Speaker 1>Hilton's on the bench. Maybe it's a bold call to

0:35:22.560 --> 0:35:24.560
<v Speaker 1>put Hilton on the bench at home, where he's raked

0:35:24.640 --> 0:35:28.080
<v Speaker 1>for years, but this season he's totally matchup dependent. He's

0:35:28.160 --> 0:35:30.720
<v Speaker 1>topped a hundred yards in three games this season against

0:35:30.800 --> 0:35:33.920
<v Speaker 1>the Browns, the forty Niners, and last week against the Texans,

0:35:34.000 --> 0:35:37.040
<v Speaker 1>whose defense is just garbage right now. In his other

0:35:37.160 --> 0:35:41.000
<v Speaker 1>six games, he's averaging two point five catches, thirty three

0:35:41.080 --> 0:35:45.880
<v Speaker 1>yards and no scores. Any competent defense whatsoever has just

0:35:45.960 --> 0:35:49.080
<v Speaker 1>locked him down. The Steelers have held every wide receiver

0:35:49.280 --> 0:35:52.320
<v Speaker 1>this year to sixty one yards are less. That's crazy.

0:35:52.480 --> 0:35:55.359
<v Speaker 1>It's it's just nuts Frank Gore and Marlon Mack around

0:35:55.400 --> 0:35:57.960
<v Speaker 1>the bench. Max pass protection troubles are keeping him off

0:35:58.000 --> 0:36:00.400
<v Speaker 1>the field. He allowed two sacks last week, one of

0:36:00.440 --> 0:36:02.880
<v Speaker 1>which turned into a fumble and a touchdown for the Texans.

0:36:03.239 --> 0:36:05.360
<v Speaker 1>That means he's not getting as many touches as Frank

0:36:05.400 --> 0:36:08.200
<v Speaker 1>Gore and really no back his top to forty eight

0:36:08.280 --> 0:36:10.520
<v Speaker 1>rush yards or scored against the Steelers in the last

0:36:10.560 --> 0:36:12.920
<v Speaker 1>three weeks, so it's a bad matchup for sets on

0:36:13.000 --> 0:36:15.360
<v Speaker 1>the bench. Stafford was the only quarterback to top to

0:36:15.520 --> 0:36:18.440
<v Speaker 1>fifty against the Steelers this season. Andy Dalton is the

0:36:18.480 --> 0:36:21.320
<v Speaker 1>only one who's thrown for two scores, and Jack Doyle,

0:36:21.360 --> 0:36:24.239
<v Speaker 1>who might be the bright spot on that offense, he's

0:36:24.280 --> 0:36:26.040
<v Speaker 1>on the bench to no tight end is top to

0:36:26.080 --> 0:36:29.200
<v Speaker 1>fifty eight yards against the Steelers this season. Only Tyler

0:36:29.360 --> 0:36:33.040
<v Speaker 1>Croft and Adam Shaheen have scored a touchdown from the

0:36:33.120 --> 0:36:36.520
<v Speaker 1>tight end position this year against the Steelers. It's just

0:36:36.640 --> 0:36:40.000
<v Speaker 1>a bad matchup for the Colts. They're all Adam Shaheen,

0:36:40.000 --> 0:36:43.160
<v Speaker 1>by the way. They gotta start playing him in Chicago. Left,

0:36:43.920 --> 0:36:45.480
<v Speaker 1>we'll go to the phone lines. We got a couple

0:36:45.520 --> 0:36:49.200
<v Speaker 1>of people a bit nice enough to hold Genie. Hello, Hi,

0:36:49.480 --> 0:36:53.560
<v Speaker 1>come hi guysa week and you guys told me to

0:36:53.600 --> 0:36:55.719
<v Speaker 1>start golf over cam and that was a great call.

0:36:55.800 --> 0:36:58.160
<v Speaker 1>And I'm wondering, do I do that again this week?

0:36:59.440 --> 0:37:02.000
<v Speaker 1>Goff camp? Is this going to be a weekly call

0:37:03.960 --> 0:37:07.520
<v Speaker 1>every week? Not frek, I have got five spots higher. Yeah,

0:37:07.560 --> 0:37:09.279
<v Speaker 1>We're gonna get into that matchup a little later. And

0:37:09.320 --> 0:37:11.600
<v Speaker 1>I've got good things to say about golf. I would

0:37:11.600 --> 0:37:14.960
<v Speaker 1>I agree. I've got golf is my number six quarterback

0:37:15.040 --> 0:37:18.200
<v Speaker 1>for this week. I like him. Good luck, Jennie, anything else,

0:37:18.280 --> 0:37:20.400
<v Speaker 1>because it's lightning round you could actually ask more than

0:37:20.480 --> 0:37:23.799
<v Speaker 1>one question. It's not late round. That's what I love

0:37:23.840 --> 0:37:27.360
<v Speaker 1>about it. Um. I started Baldwin on Thursday night, and

0:37:27.400 --> 0:37:29.520
<v Speaker 1>I have to pick one of these four. You've only

0:37:29.600 --> 0:37:31.520
<v Speaker 1>talked about two of them so far. So I have

0:37:31.640 --> 0:37:36.799
<v Speaker 1>punches Sterling, Shepherd, you do and Robbie Anderson. What would

0:37:36.800 --> 0:37:39.080
<v Speaker 1>you do? Well? If you're looking for the home run ball,

0:37:39.120 --> 0:37:41.440
<v Speaker 1>I think you go Juju Well, I think you go

0:37:41.560 --> 0:37:44.440
<v Speaker 1>Shepherd against the forty niners. And you like Robbie Anderson

0:37:44.480 --> 0:37:46.840
<v Speaker 1>as well. I like Robbie Anderson, and You've got a

0:37:46.880 --> 0:37:49.640
<v Speaker 1>lot of good options. I would take Shepherd out of

0:37:49.680 --> 0:37:52.439
<v Speaker 1>that group. Personally, I think I would do You'll see

0:37:52.480 --> 0:37:55.160
<v Speaker 1>the most targets. Thank you, Jeannie, appreciate the call. Will

0:37:55.200 --> 0:37:58.239
<v Speaker 1>work in one more. Ben, you've been on hold since

0:37:58.280 --> 0:37:59.960
<v Speaker 1>the beginning of the show. Thank you for your patients

0:38:00.040 --> 0:38:04.560
<v Speaker 1>as well. Hey, guys, appreciate it. Um. All right, I

0:38:04.680 --> 0:38:08.239
<v Speaker 1>kind of got screwed with the Zeke taking over eventually,

0:38:08.440 --> 0:38:12.440
<v Speaker 1>which obviously we were all kind of expecting. So uh,

0:38:12.640 --> 0:38:16.959
<v Speaker 1>two of these three, Um, I'm currently playing Kenyan Drake

0:38:17.040 --> 0:38:21.360
<v Speaker 1>and Funchs Or do I do like a rod Smith

0:38:21.680 --> 0:38:26.280
<v Speaker 1>McGuire and the Jets or Dan Lewis, Uh Davante Booker,

0:38:26.600 --> 0:38:30.279
<v Speaker 1>Mark Davis Bryant are sitting in free agency, and well,

0:38:30.320 --> 0:38:33.279
<v Speaker 1>I have Kenyan Drake and Damian Williams on the bench

0:38:33.400 --> 0:38:35.799
<v Speaker 1>this week, and I actually do like Funchs a little

0:38:35.840 --> 0:38:39.120
<v Speaker 1>bit in this matchup. Uh, you listed so many guys

0:38:39.200 --> 0:38:43.080
<v Speaker 1>that I lost track of. Sorry, sorry McGuire from the

0:38:43.160 --> 0:38:47.879
<v Speaker 1>Jets or Dan Lewis. Yeah, neither of those are really

0:38:48.000 --> 0:38:51.400
<v Speaker 1>doing much for me now. Uh yeah, I think Funci

0:38:51.560 --> 0:38:54.719
<v Speaker 1>is the play. Then okay, can do one one quick?

0:38:54.960 --> 0:38:58.680
<v Speaker 1>Yes you can. McCowen or cousins. I have to drop

0:38:59.040 --> 0:39:01.560
<v Speaker 1>since I was a Zeke owner, I got Rod Smith

0:39:02.560 --> 0:39:05.279
<v Speaker 1>or I could drop like a mirror dollah for to

0:39:05.360 --> 0:39:10.440
<v Speaker 1>do what from McCown. Yeah, yeah, from McCown, I have

0:39:10.640 --> 0:39:13.680
<v Speaker 1>cousins on my team. I'm looking at trying to get

0:39:13.719 --> 0:39:16.719
<v Speaker 1>a slight upgrade. Well, I think Josh is actually a

0:39:16.719 --> 0:39:20.120
<v Speaker 1>pretty big upgrade this week in particular. But I you know,

0:39:20.200 --> 0:39:22.200
<v Speaker 1>as as a Zke owner, I don't recommend you drop

0:39:22.400 --> 0:39:24.440
<v Speaker 1>Rod Smith. I think you could drop that duel at

0:39:24.480 --> 0:39:27.239
<v Speaker 1>this point, as he's almost a sabotage drop candidate as well.

0:39:27.239 --> 0:39:30.560
<v Speaker 1>It's just name value alone. He's not living up to it. Yeah,

0:39:31.280 --> 0:39:34.200
<v Speaker 1>all right, thanks, Ben, appreciate the call. When we come back,

0:39:35.080 --> 0:39:38.880
<v Speaker 1>five Hot Questions the Devani's five Hot questions, see if

0:39:38.880 --> 0:39:40.239
<v Speaker 1>you can go five and not with our panel of

0:39:40.280 --> 0:39:45.040
<v Speaker 1>experts when we return. You're listening to Fantasy Football Weekly

0:39:45.400 --> 0:40:06.920
<v Speaker 1>on the Fan. Welcomer show is Fantasy Football Weekly on

0:40:07.040 --> 0:40:10.080
<v Speaker 1>the Fan. Paul Churchi and Brian Johnson Matt Harrison with you.

0:40:10.920 --> 0:40:14.600
<v Speaker 1>Good morning. You found us two hours well, no three

0:40:14.680 --> 0:40:19.080
<v Speaker 1>hours early, uh, in response to the early Gopher game today.

0:40:19.200 --> 0:40:22.040
<v Speaker 1>Let's face that everybody's listening to this on a podcast, right, yeah,

0:40:22.200 --> 0:40:24.840
<v Speaker 1>pretty much everybody's podcasting it. And if you are, we

0:40:25.000 --> 0:40:28.080
<v Speaker 1>are very grateful because we had to reset our are

0:40:28.719 --> 0:40:30.680
<v Speaker 1>I didn't really like it. It wasn't our choice, by

0:40:30.760 --> 0:40:34.640
<v Speaker 1>the way, but the podcast, the whole podcast feed had

0:40:34.680 --> 0:40:37.680
<v Speaker 1>to be totally changed, so we wiped out years and

0:40:37.880 --> 0:40:41.600
<v Speaker 1>years of reviews and rankings all got flushed. We had

0:40:41.800 --> 0:40:44.759
<v Speaker 1>a like a four point nine five out of ten

0:40:45.239 --> 0:40:47.760
<v Speaker 1>out of five, four nine, five out of five ranking,

0:40:47.880 --> 0:40:50.759
<v Speaker 1>and all that got flushed. So we really appreciate people

0:40:50.760 --> 0:40:53.799
<v Speaker 1>who take the time to to rate and review the show.

0:40:55.480 --> 0:41:01.719
<v Speaker 1>It sounds funny. Question number one, first, I bet I

0:41:01.760 --> 0:41:04.320
<v Speaker 1>guess I should explain the sabotage drop before I do

0:41:04.440 --> 0:41:06.360
<v Speaker 1>the hot question number one. For people that don't know,

0:41:06.520 --> 0:41:09.319
<v Speaker 1>the sabotage drop is when you drop a brand name,

0:41:09.400 --> 0:41:12.120
<v Speaker 1>a player who you think is going to perform badly

0:41:12.280 --> 0:41:14.239
<v Speaker 1>for all or most of the rest of the year,

0:41:14.719 --> 0:41:17.120
<v Speaker 1>so that your opponents will pick them up and then

0:41:17.440 --> 0:41:21.719
<v Speaker 1>mistakenly start that guy. You should have said, listen, all y'all, yeah,

0:41:21.920 --> 0:41:25.040
<v Speaker 1>listen all y'all. Yeah, it's and you gotta play Beastie

0:41:25.080 --> 0:41:28.160
<v Speaker 1>Boys while making a sabotage drop. It's a great point. Oh,

0:41:28.400 --> 0:41:30.960
<v Speaker 1>that have been perfect. Next time we'll do better. You

0:41:31.040 --> 0:41:36.759
<v Speaker 1>can boys sabotage on YouTube. Thank you. It's a good

0:41:36.840 --> 0:41:41.600
<v Speaker 1>song anyway, great video, great video. Personally, I can't stand it,

0:41:41.960 --> 0:41:44.759
<v Speaker 1>and I know you planned it. I like sabotage and

0:41:45.040 --> 0:41:48.480
<v Speaker 1>I also like the rare, the almost totally unlistened to

0:41:49.680 --> 0:41:53.440
<v Speaker 1>jazz album by the Beastie Boys that they released. Or

0:41:53.520 --> 0:41:56.440
<v Speaker 1>it's not all instrumental all instrumental gez No, it's not

0:41:56.600 --> 0:42:01.439
<v Speaker 1>Richard gs. I forgot about that Hot question Number one.

0:42:02.080 --> 0:42:08.120
<v Speaker 1>Do you sabotage drop Will Fuller? Matt Yes, it looks

0:42:08.200 --> 0:42:12.600
<v Speaker 1>like Fuller was completely touchdown dependent anyway, and that was

0:42:12.680 --> 0:42:15.799
<v Speaker 1>dependent on Deshaun Watson throwing the ball. And now it's

0:42:15.840 --> 0:42:18.120
<v Speaker 1>Tom Savage and he's not going to throw three touchdowns

0:42:18.200 --> 0:42:20.759
<v Speaker 1>per game. If Savage can throw one per game, it's

0:42:20.760 --> 0:42:23.799
<v Speaker 1>going to go to DeAndre Hopkins or c J. Fedorowitz.

0:42:24.080 --> 0:42:28.440
<v Speaker 1>Hopkins is averaged twenty four targets, not averaged. He's had

0:42:28.480 --> 0:42:31.240
<v Speaker 1>twenty four targets and six quarters. He's averaging four targets

0:42:31.360 --> 0:42:34.560
<v Speaker 1>per quarter from Tom Savage, he's getting all the work.

0:42:34.960 --> 0:42:39.680
<v Speaker 1>Let's jam up a roster spot with Will or Will Fuller. Yeah,

0:42:40.120 --> 0:42:43.279
<v Speaker 1>there we go. You didn't get You should have listened

0:42:43.280 --> 0:42:45.120
<v Speaker 1>to this ahead of time. Who knows where the cursing

0:42:45.239 --> 0:42:48.040
<v Speaker 1>might be. Yeah, well, let's hope not. But this one's

0:42:48.120 --> 0:42:50.040
<v Speaker 1>this one's pretty clean. I think it is pretty I've

0:42:50.040 --> 0:42:52.800
<v Speaker 1>heard on the radio many times, although that might be

0:42:52.840 --> 0:42:55.000
<v Speaker 1>a radio I didn't know if if this is Brian,

0:42:56.000 --> 0:42:59.080
<v Speaker 1>I'm telling you all. Let a right. Uh yeah, I

0:42:59.120 --> 0:43:01.279
<v Speaker 1>got nothing much to really add here. Um, there are

0:43:01.320 --> 0:43:04.120
<v Speaker 1>some major roadblocks on fuller schedule to in Baltimore and

0:43:04.200 --> 0:43:07.120
<v Speaker 1>Jacksonville and key points of the fantasy season. So yeah,

0:43:07.200 --> 0:43:09.399
<v Speaker 1>he he was catching a touchdown on every other pass

0:43:09.480 --> 0:43:12.440
<v Speaker 1>with DeShawn Watson that was a production that wasn't sustainable.

0:43:12.719 --> 0:43:14.839
<v Speaker 1>It certainly is not with Tom Savage at the Helm.

0:43:15.280 --> 0:43:19.200
<v Speaker 1>I'm gonna say not yet. And here's why I got.

0:43:19.400 --> 0:43:21.200
<v Speaker 1>I got two starts with him, and one of them

0:43:21.280 --> 0:43:23.880
<v Speaker 1>is in the first week of the playoffs. Week eleven

0:43:24.040 --> 0:43:27.280
<v Speaker 1>is Arizona. Patrick Peterson is gonna be on DeAndre Hopkins

0:43:27.320 --> 0:43:28.920
<v Speaker 1>and we all know the number two receiver, and those

0:43:28.960 --> 0:43:30.560
<v Speaker 1>games get fed. I want him for that game, but

0:43:30.640 --> 0:43:34.520
<v Speaker 1>most importantly Week fourteen against San Francisco, first week in

0:43:34.600 --> 0:43:37.200
<v Speaker 1>my playoffs, I'm gonna go win that first game in

0:43:37.280 --> 0:43:39.880
<v Speaker 1>my playoffs with Will Fuller, and then I'm gonna do

0:43:40.000 --> 0:43:43.440
<v Speaker 1>the sabotage drop week fifteen. Leading into the Week fifteen

0:43:43.520 --> 0:43:48.680
<v Speaker 1>game He's got Jacksonville and Pittsburgh. Think about how juicy

0:43:48.880 --> 0:43:52.560
<v Speaker 1>that sabotaged drop is gonna be. After the Week fourteen

0:43:52.640 --> 0:43:56.600
<v Speaker 1>thrashing against San Francisco, you drop him, some fool picks

0:43:56.680 --> 0:44:02.040
<v Speaker 1>him up against Jacksonville or Pits. That's the timing for

0:44:02.120 --> 0:44:06.040
<v Speaker 1>the sabotage drop on Will Fuller. Not yet, you can

0:44:06.120 --> 0:44:10.680
<v Speaker 1>just keep the shop hot. Question number two, Can I

0:44:10.800 --> 0:44:16.440
<v Speaker 1>sabotage drop DeMarco Murray, Brian Listen all of y'all. This

0:44:16.680 --> 0:44:20.400
<v Speaker 1>is not a sabotage. No, I am not sabotage dropping

0:44:20.440 --> 0:44:23.600
<v Speaker 1>DeMarco Murray. He did slow and noticeably in the second

0:44:23.640 --> 0:44:25.800
<v Speaker 1>half last season, but last year he had a hundred

0:44:25.840 --> 0:44:29.120
<v Speaker 1>and sixty carries through his first eight games. This year,

0:44:29.200 --> 0:44:32.120
<v Speaker 1>he has only carries through his first eight games. He

0:44:32.280 --> 0:44:34.800
<v Speaker 1>is practicing in full after suffering a minor knee injury

0:44:34.920 --> 0:44:36.960
<v Speaker 1>last week. I'm just holding on to him because we

0:44:37.000 --> 0:44:39.080
<v Speaker 1>have Pittsburgh and Indian the next two weeks. Those are

0:44:39.120 --> 0:44:42.400
<v Speaker 1>great matchups for Murray. I'm not too excited about Houston

0:44:42.480 --> 0:44:44.840
<v Speaker 1>and in Arizona in the following weeks. But then there's

0:44:44.920 --> 0:44:47.800
<v Speaker 1>that was San Francisco forty Niners again in week fifteen

0:44:47.840 --> 0:44:51.439
<v Speaker 1>for DeMarco Murray. So I am holding. Despite Derrick Henry

0:44:51.480 --> 0:44:54.040
<v Speaker 1>eating to his workload, He's still a viable option, although

0:44:54.080 --> 0:44:57.400
<v Speaker 1>not in Elite one anymore. Brian hit all my points,

0:44:57.560 --> 0:45:00.800
<v Speaker 1>but also they get the Rams and the Fantasy playoffs,

0:45:00.840 --> 0:45:03.040
<v Speaker 1>and the Rams have been really bad against running backs

0:45:03.120 --> 0:45:06.160
<v Speaker 1>this year too, so two great matchups in the Fantasy

0:45:06.160 --> 0:45:10.280
<v Speaker 1>playoffs for DeMarco Murray. That's why you cannot sabotage dropping.

0:45:10.600 --> 0:45:13.000
<v Speaker 1>He's been worse than most people realize. In eight games

0:45:13.080 --> 0:45:17.080
<v Speaker 1>this year, he's had six flat out bad games out

0:45:17.120 --> 0:45:19.440
<v Speaker 1>of eight where you almost certainly wish you had not

0:45:19.640 --> 0:45:22.840
<v Speaker 1>started him. Six out of eight times. Here's DeMarco Murray's

0:45:22.840 --> 0:45:28.840
<v Speaker 1>average game. Forty nine rushing yards, fourteen receiving yards, and

0:45:29.000 --> 0:45:32.480
<v Speaker 1>a quarter of a touchdown. That's it. So what you're

0:45:32.520 --> 0:45:36.840
<v Speaker 1>saying is you sabotage drafted him. You sabotage yourself. And

0:45:36.960 --> 0:45:39.560
<v Speaker 1>to Brian's point, Brian was all over this in the preseason.

0:45:39.920 --> 0:45:45.560
<v Speaker 1>He was banging the drum to avoid DeMarco Murray's so

0:45:45.680 --> 0:45:48.640
<v Speaker 1>many sounds right now, there's so much happening right now.

0:45:48.680 --> 0:45:50.960
<v Speaker 1>They the basic boy, you should have put a peacock

0:45:51.040 --> 0:45:55.200
<v Speaker 1>in that song. I thought that sounded fantastic. Um. Your

0:45:55.239 --> 0:45:59.320
<v Speaker 1>ideal scenario, though, is to trade DeMarco Murray to the

0:45:59.360 --> 0:46:01.920
<v Speaker 1>Henry owner. Let that guy deal with this headache on

0:46:01.960 --> 0:46:03.560
<v Speaker 1>who to start or just start in both. You said

0:46:03.640 --> 0:46:05.960
<v Speaker 1>you you can play this angle. You don't have to

0:46:06.040 --> 0:46:08.279
<v Speaker 1>pick which one. You can start them both the rest

0:46:08.320 --> 0:46:11.560
<v Speaker 1>of the way. But if you can't trade him, yes,

0:46:11.840 --> 0:46:14.759
<v Speaker 1>DeMarco Murray is sabotage droppable. I think there's only two

0:46:14.800 --> 0:46:16.920
<v Speaker 1>games on the schedule where I feel like I can

0:46:17.040 --> 0:46:19.680
<v Speaker 1>reasonably start somebody who's bad six out of eight times,

0:46:19.960 --> 0:46:23.359
<v Speaker 1>and that's Indian, San Francisco and the San Francisco games.

0:46:23.400 --> 0:46:25.240
<v Speaker 1>Week fifteen, I'm already get knocked out of the playoffs,

0:46:25.239 --> 0:46:27.399
<v Speaker 1>so we got a start in week fourteen. Oh wait,

0:46:28.000 --> 0:46:32.879
<v Speaker 1>but week fourteen is the rim hot question number three,

0:46:33.840 --> 0:46:37.879
<v Speaker 1>Which of the Eagles backs, if any, will emerge as

0:46:38.040 --> 0:46:43.120
<v Speaker 1>the most reliable fantasy starter? Matt, I was very happy

0:46:43.160 --> 0:46:45.560
<v Speaker 1>to see that you put if any on there. I'm

0:46:45.560 --> 0:46:48.120
<v Speaker 1>going to take that if any option and say none

0:46:48.160 --> 0:46:51.080
<v Speaker 1>of the above. I think that the Eagles will model

0:46:51.120 --> 0:46:53.040
<v Speaker 1>the running game the rest of the season after what

0:46:53.200 --> 0:46:55.680
<v Speaker 1>the Patriots do. From here on out, you'll see both

0:46:55.719 --> 0:46:58.880
<v Speaker 1>the giant blunt splitting touches, keeping them fresh for what

0:46:59.040 --> 0:47:01.640
<v Speaker 1>they hope is a deep la off run Corey Clement

0:47:01.719 --> 0:47:04.520
<v Speaker 1>and Wendel smallwater there to steal receptions and be change

0:47:04.560 --> 0:47:07.200
<v Speaker 1>of pace. Guys, I'm avoiding the whole running game here,

0:47:07.239 --> 0:47:09.600
<v Speaker 1>if I can. I think a gi just muddled muddied

0:47:09.640 --> 0:47:13.040
<v Speaker 1>the waters there. M hmm, Tony, can I get some

0:47:13.120 --> 0:47:18.880
<v Speaker 1>cypress hill while we discuss Lagarrett blunt? Please? It's and

0:47:18.960 --> 0:47:22.399
<v Speaker 1>it's not close here Lagarrett wants he's pretty bad. He's bad.

0:47:22.600 --> 0:47:25.640
<v Speaker 1>Despite his four point six yards per carry that sounds impressive,

0:47:25.719 --> 0:47:27.680
<v Speaker 1>it is not. When you take away his sixty eight

0:47:27.760 --> 0:47:30.120
<v Speaker 1>yard run against the Chargers, He's averaging just four yards

0:47:30.160 --> 0:47:32.200
<v Speaker 1>per carry. But wait, la Garrett one is good at

0:47:32.239 --> 0:47:36.320
<v Speaker 1>the stripe, right the negative ghost Rider. He is not

0:47:36.440 --> 0:47:39.520
<v Speaker 1>good at this stripe. He has eight attempts inside the

0:47:39.680 --> 0:47:43.120
<v Speaker 1>vibe for negative five yards in one touchdown. He is

0:47:43.200 --> 0:47:47.279
<v Speaker 1>the Snickel Fritz of running backs. Yes, nice, I don't

0:47:47.280 --> 0:47:49.840
<v Speaker 1>know what that means, but I'm assuming it's a cypress

0:47:49.880 --> 0:47:57.120
<v Speaker 1>hill repper have van Alright. In the old days and

0:47:57.200 --> 0:48:01.320
<v Speaker 1>in the harsher crueler days of Fantasy Football Weekly, we

0:48:01.400 --> 0:48:04.560
<v Speaker 1>would never have injected the if any into this. It

0:48:04.600 --> 0:48:07.600
<v Speaker 1>would have just laid there like a trap waiting to spring.

0:48:08.320 --> 0:48:11.239
<v Speaker 1>But for some reason, we're in a kinder, gentler time now,

0:48:11.440 --> 0:48:13.360
<v Speaker 1>and I threw the off any into the question and

0:48:13.480 --> 0:48:16.000
<v Speaker 1>really tipped my hand. The answer is none of these guys.

0:48:16.280 --> 0:48:18.520
<v Speaker 1>Last week is a great example of how frustrating this

0:48:18.640 --> 0:48:22.200
<v Speaker 1>timeshare is going to be. Even though the running game

0:48:22.239 --> 0:48:26.000
<v Speaker 1>was very successful in a blowout victory over Denver, they

0:48:26.080 --> 0:48:28.640
<v Speaker 1>ran the ball thirty seven times, which is not normal

0:48:28.680 --> 0:48:37.600
<v Speaker 1>for any team. Here's your here's your carries split twelve, nine, eight,

0:48:38.280 --> 0:48:42.880
<v Speaker 1>and five between four guys. And that's in a thirty

0:48:43.120 --> 0:48:48.480
<v Speaker 1>seven carry game, which is extremely unusual most games, it's

0:48:48.520 --> 0:48:50.560
<v Speaker 1>gonna be far less than that for all of them.

0:48:51.200 --> 0:48:53.879
<v Speaker 1>And here's the first problem, by the way. Problem number

0:48:53.920 --> 0:48:55.880
<v Speaker 1>one is, even if we were to just give you

0:48:55.960 --> 0:48:59.480
<v Speaker 1>the twelve, the nine, and the eight carries, that's not

0:48:59.719 --> 0:49:02.719
<v Speaker 1>enough to be successful. Twelve, nine and eight isn't enough.

0:49:02.880 --> 0:49:05.279
<v Speaker 1>We know that we need running backs to get the

0:49:05.320 --> 0:49:08.800
<v Speaker 1>ball more than that. The second problem is, I defy

0:49:08.920 --> 0:49:10.880
<v Speaker 1>listeners right now, tell me who is the twelve and

0:49:10.880 --> 0:49:12.799
<v Speaker 1>who is the nine and who is the eight? From

0:49:12.920 --> 0:49:16.960
<v Speaker 1>last week's box score from the Eagles? Can you correctly

0:49:17.000 --> 0:49:20.879
<v Speaker 1>assign those running backs to those spots? And if you can't,

0:49:21.440 --> 0:49:22.840
<v Speaker 1>that tells you everything you need to know about the

0:49:22.880 --> 0:49:25.440
<v Speaker 1>frustration you're going to have on a weekend and week out. Basis,

0:49:26.520 --> 0:49:29.800
<v Speaker 1>most weeks, somebody, some one of these running backs is

0:49:29.840 --> 0:49:32.040
<v Speaker 1>gonna have a good game. Good luck starting out who

0:49:32.080 --> 0:49:34.680
<v Speaker 1>it's gonna be. Most of the time, you're not gonna

0:49:34.719 --> 0:49:36.960
<v Speaker 1>know until after the game is over, and at that

0:49:37.080 --> 0:49:43.000
<v Speaker 1>point it is too late. Des hot question number four.

0:49:43.520 --> 0:49:44.919
<v Speaker 1>At the end of the day, are we gonna wish

0:49:44.960 --> 0:49:50.600
<v Speaker 1>we'd just dropped Jamis Winston now, Brian. Uh, Obviously we're

0:49:50.600 --> 0:49:53.320
<v Speaker 1>talking redraft leagues. Uh, and I'm gonna say yes, what

0:49:53.440 --> 0:49:55.600
<v Speaker 1>I hear shut down for a couple of weeks and

0:49:55.840 --> 0:49:59.239
<v Speaker 1>visiting Dr James Andrews. None of that bodes well for

0:49:59.640 --> 0:50:02.759
<v Speaker 1>a rebec, especially when you're dealing with a shoulder injury. Uh.

0:50:02.880 --> 0:50:05.279
<v Speaker 1>And Tampa Bay looks to be a noncontender. There's no

0:50:05.440 --> 0:50:08.080
<v Speaker 1>there's no reason to rush Winston back. Uh. They're on

0:50:08.239 --> 0:50:11.319
<v Speaker 1>by next week, then at Atlanta at Green Bay. Those

0:50:11.360 --> 0:50:13.120
<v Speaker 1>are decent matchups. So we don't even know if he's

0:50:13.120 --> 0:50:15.759
<v Speaker 1>gonna be playing then. And I don't know that's a

0:50:15.800 --> 0:50:18.040
<v Speaker 1>dead roster spot right now. So basically I am dropping

0:50:18.040 --> 0:50:21.439
<v Speaker 1>Winston right now. Tony can I get snoop doggs drop

0:50:21.480 --> 0:50:25.840
<v Speaker 1>it like it's hot. It's not really if you're in

0:50:25.880 --> 0:50:28.840
<v Speaker 1>a one quarterback league, I drop him. According to Fanball

0:50:28.920 --> 0:50:32.200
<v Speaker 1>strength of schedule calculator, they don't have another matchup left

0:50:32.280 --> 0:50:35.200
<v Speaker 1>on the on the docket against a bad defense. It's

0:50:35.239 --> 0:50:37.759
<v Speaker 1>all the middle of the packer Worse, his shoulder might

0:50:37.800 --> 0:50:39.960
<v Speaker 1>not be right until next season. There's gonna be a

0:50:40.040 --> 0:50:42.040
<v Speaker 1>new coach in Tampa next year. The locker room is

0:50:42.040 --> 0:50:44.480
<v Speaker 1>a mess. There's the hard knocks hangover, and I don't

0:50:44.480 --> 0:50:47.320
<v Speaker 1>want to try to eat any more. W's with Jamis Winston.

0:50:47.960 --> 0:50:51.600
<v Speaker 1>He visited Dr Andrews and that's never good. Sam Bradford

0:50:51.600 --> 0:50:54.920
<v Speaker 1>found himself on I R after visiting Dr Andrews as

0:50:55.080 --> 0:50:58.480
<v Speaker 1>as he was hobbling out of the lobby. That's how

0:50:58.560 --> 0:51:01.640
<v Speaker 1>factor I are, Andrew. That's right, Dr I R Andrews.

0:51:02.200 --> 0:51:05.600
<v Speaker 1>Um it suggests that team doctors don't like what they're seeing,

0:51:05.719 --> 0:51:07.719
<v Speaker 1>so they fly them off to Dr Andrews to see

0:51:07.719 --> 0:51:10.520
<v Speaker 1>if they can find some angle that they that they

0:51:10.840 --> 0:51:14.040
<v Speaker 1>haven't been able to find themselves. Um. I think Jamis

0:51:14.080 --> 0:51:16.120
<v Speaker 1>doesn't play for at least several weeks, and it's already

0:51:16.200 --> 0:51:18.000
<v Speaker 1>lost season for the Bucks right there. Two and six.

0:51:18.239 --> 0:51:20.640
<v Speaker 1>They're not going to the playoffs. And there's a very

0:51:20.719 --> 0:51:24.280
<v Speaker 1>real chance that even if he could play, let's advance

0:51:24.320 --> 0:51:27.000
<v Speaker 1>the clock three four weeks, week thirteen, a week fourteen,

0:51:27.800 --> 0:51:29.160
<v Speaker 1>they might say, you know what, we don't want to

0:51:29.160 --> 0:51:31.239
<v Speaker 1>go Andrew Luck on this thing. We don't want to

0:51:31.320 --> 0:51:33.960
<v Speaker 1>take a bad take a shoulder injury and make it

0:51:34.080 --> 0:51:36.880
<v Speaker 1>worse and then lose the next season, which would be

0:51:36.920 --> 0:51:40.000
<v Speaker 1>a very reasonable concern. Luck played on a bad shoulder

0:51:40.040 --> 0:51:42.200
<v Speaker 1>for far too long and you end up losing the

0:51:42.280 --> 0:51:45.719
<v Speaker 1>next season. And to your point earlier, the schedule is

0:51:45.800 --> 0:51:49.040
<v Speaker 1>not favorable. I got one favorable matchup left the whole way,

0:51:49.160 --> 0:51:51.040
<v Speaker 1>and all the rest are to your point, middle to

0:51:51.080 --> 0:51:54.239
<v Speaker 1>pack or worse. At the end of the day, you're

0:51:54.239 --> 0:52:00.640
<v Speaker 1>gonna wish you'd just dropped Jamis Winston hot Question number five.

0:52:01.040 --> 0:52:04.640
<v Speaker 1>Should Gronk owners implement the rarely used tight end handcuff

0:52:04.760 --> 0:52:07.959
<v Speaker 1>and nab mar tell Us Bennett Matt No. We thought

0:52:08.040 --> 0:52:10.279
<v Speaker 1>this would work out last year, but Bennett only showed

0:52:10.360 --> 0:52:12.880
<v Speaker 1>up in a couple of rare games in which Gronk

0:52:13.160 --> 0:52:18.120
<v Speaker 1>was active but injured, where Gronk was playing decoy. The

0:52:18.239 --> 0:52:21.480
<v Speaker 1>games which Gronk didn't play, Bennett wasn't involved. The games

0:52:21.520 --> 0:52:24.720
<v Speaker 1>which Gronk did play and was healthy, Bennett wasn't involved.

0:52:24.960 --> 0:52:28.399
<v Speaker 1>Plus the shoulder injury may still require surgery. That's why

0:52:28.480 --> 0:52:31.280
<v Speaker 1>the Packers cut him, because Bennett wanted to have season

0:52:31.440 --> 0:52:34.359
<v Speaker 1>ending surgery on his shoulder, and I don't know how

0:52:34.440 --> 0:52:36.440
<v Speaker 1>he passed the physical in New England and he's going

0:52:36.520 --> 0:52:40.640
<v Speaker 1>to play now, So no, don't pick him up. All right, Bryan,

0:52:41.320 --> 0:52:44.000
<v Speaker 1>nothing to add, full agreement there, I'll have this. He's

0:52:44.040 --> 0:52:47.240
<v Speaker 1>not good. You know, I liked him in the preseason.

0:52:47.320 --> 0:52:50.000
<v Speaker 1>I really thought that with Aaron Rodgers and the best

0:52:50.040 --> 0:52:52.200
<v Speaker 1>tight end Aaron Rodgers ever had, I really thought that

0:52:52.239 --> 0:52:53.960
<v Speaker 1>Bennett was going to be good. I rostered him on

0:52:54.360 --> 0:52:57.600
<v Speaker 1>several of my several of my own leagues, so I've

0:52:57.640 --> 0:53:02.040
<v Speaker 1>watched him very closely. He dropped passes, he appeared to

0:53:02.080 --> 0:53:04.799
<v Speaker 1>be in the wrong spot, he did nothing after the catch.

0:53:04.960 --> 0:53:08.000
<v Speaker 1>There's nothing to see here with Martelli s. Bennett. He

0:53:08.160 --> 0:53:10.880
<v Speaker 1>is all names and all He's all names and all excuses.

0:53:11.000 --> 0:53:14.600
<v Speaker 1>All martellis S. Bennett is at this point, let's work

0:53:14.640 --> 0:53:17.839
<v Speaker 1>in one quick matchup. That would be Jets at Buccaneers. Hey,

0:53:17.920 --> 0:53:22.640
<v Speaker 1>that's me. I gotta find its hold on flipping pages.

0:53:22.880 --> 0:53:24.680
<v Speaker 1>Here we go. What's the what's the revenge song we

0:53:24.719 --> 0:53:27.919
<v Speaker 1>should be playing? Uh? There's a system of a down

0:53:28.040 --> 0:53:30.640
<v Speaker 1>song called revenge. You I don't know if it's clean.

0:53:31.560 --> 0:53:34.439
<v Speaker 1>I don't either, probably not. Um, yeah, I've got nothing

0:53:34.480 --> 0:53:36.400
<v Speaker 1>for that revenge. I'm sure there are a lot of

0:53:36.480 --> 0:53:38.200
<v Speaker 1>great revenge songs. I can't think of any of the

0:53:38.239 --> 0:53:40.200
<v Speaker 1>top of my head. It is. It's only eight twelve.

0:53:40.640 --> 0:53:43.400
<v Speaker 1>I can't be expected to be an encyclopedia of musical knowledge.

0:53:43.440 --> 0:53:47.360
<v Speaker 1>At eight twelve in the morning, Jets take on the Buccaneers.

0:53:47.400 --> 0:53:49.319
<v Speaker 1>On the Jet side, Josh mccowns might take a chance

0:53:49.360 --> 0:53:51.400
<v Speaker 1>to me quarterback, but that it doesn't end there if

0:53:51.440 --> 0:53:53.959
<v Speaker 1>I like, and by the way, a grade on Josh

0:53:54.040 --> 0:53:58.520
<v Speaker 1>McCown he's my number eight quarterback this week. I love

0:53:58.640 --> 0:54:01.319
<v Speaker 1>him as a described earlier. Let's stick with other parts

0:54:01.320 --> 0:54:04.080
<v Speaker 1>of the passing game. Robby Anderson a B grade. He's

0:54:04.120 --> 0:54:06.800
<v Speaker 1>taken over as the Jets top receivers, now scored in

0:54:06.880 --> 0:54:10.839
<v Speaker 1>three straight games. He's averaging almost sixteen yards per catch,

0:54:11.080 --> 0:54:13.240
<v Speaker 1>and he gets a great matchup against a Buck secondary

0:54:13.320 --> 0:54:16.480
<v Speaker 1>that's given up eleven touchdowns to opposing receivers. That is

0:54:16.560 --> 0:54:20.200
<v Speaker 1>the second most touchdowns to receivers in the league. I

0:54:20.320 --> 0:54:23.400
<v Speaker 1>also like running opposite him. Jermaine Curse with a C grade.

0:54:23.880 --> 0:54:25.759
<v Speaker 1>He's a low volume guy, curses, but he has a

0:54:25.840 --> 0:54:29.440
<v Speaker 1>touchdown score and has mentioned Tampa Bay secondary give me

0:54:29.480 --> 0:54:31.560
<v Speaker 1>up the second most wide receiver touchdowns. So it feels

0:54:31.560 --> 0:54:34.440
<v Speaker 1>like it all comes together here. All but three of

0:54:34.560 --> 0:54:40.279
<v Speaker 1>the wide receiver touchdowns they have allowed have oh yeah,

0:54:43.320 --> 0:54:46.400
<v Speaker 1>number one revenge. There you go, this is what I

0:54:46.440 --> 0:54:48.160
<v Speaker 1>was gonna play. And then google the list and it's

0:54:48.200 --> 0:54:53.400
<v Speaker 1>that top revenge. So Uncle Joe is Dave Coolier going

0:54:53.440 --> 0:54:57.279
<v Speaker 1>to be at this game? All but three of the

0:54:57.320 --> 0:55:00.239
<v Speaker 1>wide receiver touchdowns that the Bucks have allowed if gone

0:55:00.280 --> 0:55:03.680
<v Speaker 1>to non number one receivers, So that again works in

0:55:03.760 --> 0:55:06.440
<v Speaker 1>Jermaine Curse his favor for a long time, Jermaine of

0:55:06.520 --> 0:55:08.400
<v Speaker 1>this week, As you guys know, Jamaine Curse was might

0:55:08.440 --> 0:55:10.800
<v Speaker 1>take a chance of a receiver, and I only pivoted

0:55:10.840 --> 0:55:13.680
<v Speaker 1>to Adam Adam Humphrey because I think Adam humphreeze, so

0:55:13.680 --> 0:55:16.319
<v Speaker 1>I think he is a deeper selection. How though they're

0:55:16.320 --> 0:55:18.960
<v Speaker 1>most perfectly good and they're both on the available on

0:55:18.960 --> 0:55:23.239
<v Speaker 1>the waiver wire. Is this the one that involves a

0:55:23.320 --> 0:55:26.160
<v Speaker 1>movie theater at some point? Okay, that happened already. That

0:55:26.200 --> 0:55:28.920
<v Speaker 1>already happened. Okay, normally you'd think it cats that I

0:55:29.000 --> 0:55:32.439
<v Speaker 1>missed it, talked right through it. Austin Seferian Jenkins while

0:55:32.440 --> 0:55:35.560
<v Speaker 1>I was staying with the passing game. Revenge Game. Well yeah,

0:55:35.640 --> 0:55:39.480
<v Speaker 1>and of Revenge Angle has averaged only three catches for

0:55:39.640 --> 0:55:42.520
<v Speaker 1>twenty three yards the last three weeks, which is which

0:55:42.560 --> 0:55:44.720
<v Speaker 1>has gotta be worrisome. Is heads into a matchup against

0:55:44.760 --> 0:55:47.200
<v Speaker 1>his former team. The Bucks have allowed the third fewest

0:55:47.280 --> 0:55:49.640
<v Speaker 1>yards per game to opposing tight ends. He is a

0:55:49.800 --> 0:55:53.120
<v Speaker 1>C grade. Let's go to the running game. Matt Forte

0:55:53.239 --> 0:55:55.759
<v Speaker 1>is out. Belal Powell is a B grade. He'll get

0:55:55.800 --> 0:55:57.960
<v Speaker 1>the majority of the work. He's been very reliable in

0:55:58.040 --> 0:56:00.600
<v Speaker 1>that scenario over the past two years. When he gets

0:56:00.640 --> 0:56:04.680
<v Speaker 1>all the work, he's really good. Five of the six

0:56:05.080 --> 0:56:09.439
<v Speaker 1>non Forte games games that Fote missed, Powell put up big,

0:56:09.640 --> 0:56:13.600
<v Speaker 1>big numbers. Last week Alvin Kamara rolled up eighty four

0:56:13.719 --> 0:56:17.160
<v Speaker 1>receiving yards against Tampa Bay, and the week before that,

0:56:17.520 --> 0:56:20.920
<v Speaker 1>Christian McCaffrey rolled up fifty receiving yards. Paulo is a

0:56:21.120 --> 0:56:24.040
<v Speaker 1>good dual threat. This week he gets a B grade.

0:56:24.239 --> 0:56:27.360
<v Speaker 1>I'm putting Elijah McGuire on the bench. I don't know

0:56:27.800 --> 0:56:29.759
<v Speaker 1>you could in a pinch, you could play him. But

0:56:29.840 --> 0:56:31.879
<v Speaker 1>even with Forte out, I'm worried he doesn't do enough

0:56:31.880 --> 0:56:33.480
<v Speaker 1>and he hasn't top more than two point three yards

0:56:33.520 --> 0:56:35.520
<v Speaker 1>per cary since way back in Week four. I got

0:56:35.560 --> 0:56:37.719
<v Speaker 1>all the good day to today it was a homecoming

0:56:37.800 --> 0:56:43.400
<v Speaker 1>game for blal Powell from Wakeland, Florida, just east of Tampa.

0:56:45.360 --> 0:56:47.600
<v Speaker 1>All right, let's go to the Tampa Bay side. Uh,

0:56:48.160 --> 0:56:50.720
<v Speaker 1>Ryan Fitzpatrick was Bryant's take a chance on the quarterback.

0:56:51.200 --> 0:56:53.600
<v Speaker 1>Some people are a little bit concerned after years there

0:56:53.680 --> 0:56:55.799
<v Speaker 1>is the revenge angle. Some people who look concerned after

0:56:55.920 --> 0:56:59.800
<v Speaker 1>years of throwing to the the players in green that

0:57:00.120 --> 0:57:02.960
<v Speaker 1>Stu Beard will be a little disoriented and will and

0:57:03.040 --> 0:57:05.880
<v Speaker 1>known for his interceptions anyway, will again throw to the

0:57:05.920 --> 0:57:08.080
<v Speaker 1>players in green. Well, if he's known for his interceptions,

0:57:08.120 --> 0:57:10.960
<v Speaker 1>he'll probably avoid the players in green. Maybe that's it

0:57:12.239 --> 0:57:15.719
<v Speaker 1>double reverse psychology. Uh. Deshaun Jackson was already seeing a

0:57:15.800 --> 0:57:18.480
<v Speaker 1>decent target number with at least six in every game

0:57:18.800 --> 0:57:20.880
<v Speaker 1>heading into last week, and he'll get more. With Mike

0:57:20.960 --> 0:57:23.919
<v Speaker 1>Evans out, Jackson's got a very winnable matchup against Jets

0:57:24.000 --> 0:57:27.280
<v Speaker 1>cornerbacks Justin Burris and Darryl Roberts, and the Jets have

0:57:27.360 --> 0:57:30.280
<v Speaker 1>allowed the fourth most receiving yards, second most touchdowns to

0:57:30.360 --> 0:57:33.640
<v Speaker 1>whiteouts to Seawan Jackson, B grade here, I already gave

0:57:33.680 --> 0:57:35.560
<v Speaker 1>you Adam Humphreys as might take a chance on me

0:57:35.760 --> 0:57:39.520
<v Speaker 1>wide receiver in this matchup Cameron brad also a B grade.

0:57:39.920 --> 0:57:41.880
<v Speaker 1>He's going up against the Jets team that's allowed the

0:57:41.960 --> 0:57:44.960
<v Speaker 1>sixth most yards and tenth most receptions the tight ends,

0:57:45.320 --> 0:57:49.440
<v Speaker 1>and this note from ESPN Ryan Fitzpatrick's got the league's

0:57:49.520 --> 0:57:55.920
<v Speaker 1>top passer rating when targeting tight ends since nineteen touchdowns

0:57:56.080 --> 0:57:58.840
<v Speaker 1>two tight ends, zero interceptions to tight ends. Think I

0:57:58.920 --> 0:58:01.280
<v Speaker 1>passed that one onto you. Camer is going to be

0:58:01.920 --> 0:58:03.920
<v Speaker 1>the best tight end in the league this week. I

0:58:04.160 --> 0:58:06.520
<v Speaker 1>just like it. You're throwing down the gauntlet. Last guy

0:58:06.600 --> 0:58:10.360
<v Speaker 1>will mention Doug Martin just eight carries for seven yards

0:58:10.480 --> 0:58:12.520
<v Speaker 1>last week, but the Bucks fell behind early in the game.

0:58:12.560 --> 0:58:14.760
<v Speaker 1>Script went upside down. Martin is gonna get a lot

0:58:14.840 --> 0:58:17.040
<v Speaker 1>more work this week. With Winston out and Evans out.

0:58:17.240 --> 0:58:19.320
<v Speaker 1>He faces a Jets team that's allowed the tenth most

0:58:19.400 --> 0:58:22.200
<v Speaker 1>rushing yards. They've allowed just one rushing touchdown though in

0:58:22.240 --> 0:58:26.000
<v Speaker 1>the past seven games. Doug Martin ce grade is startable,

0:58:26.040 --> 0:58:27.919
<v Speaker 1>but only at a C level. When we come back,

0:58:28.520 --> 0:58:31.800
<v Speaker 1>wrap up some more of our matchups, including Texans taking

0:58:31.880 --> 0:58:34.800
<v Speaker 1>on the Rams. Can you start any part of the

0:58:34.920 --> 0:58:38.400
<v Speaker 1>Texans passing game? Find out when we come back. Your

0:58:38.480 --> 0:59:16.240
<v Speaker 1>distinct of Fantasy Football weekly on the fan Welcome back

0:59:16.280 --> 0:59:19.280
<v Speaker 1>to the show Fantasy Football Weekly on Fan Culture and

0:59:19.320 --> 0:59:22.360
<v Speaker 1>Brian Johnson Matt Harrison with you. Plenty of matchups to

0:59:22.440 --> 0:59:24.360
<v Speaker 1>get to over the course of this segment and then

0:59:24.520 --> 0:59:29.320
<v Speaker 1>uh last segment, Lightning Round Premature speculation coming up next.

0:59:29.440 --> 0:59:33.480
<v Speaker 1>Let's see Texans take on the Rams. Brian Ram, secondary's

0:59:33.600 --> 0:59:36.960
<v Speaker 1>pretty good in the Texans quarterback is really bad. What

0:59:37.040 --> 0:59:40.400
<v Speaker 1>do you make of the passing game in this matchup? Yeah,

0:59:40.480 --> 0:59:44.360
<v Speaker 1>I mean you're still starring DeAndre Hopkins as une Everyone

0:59:44.480 --> 0:59:46.520
<v Speaker 1>probably already knows he only gets a bee though he

0:59:46.640 --> 0:59:49.040
<v Speaker 1>has seen twenty four targets in a game and a half.

0:59:49.480 --> 0:59:52.880
<v Speaker 1>With Tom Savage at quarterback, that's sixteen targets a game. Uh,

0:59:53.080 --> 0:59:55.080
<v Speaker 1>he'll probably see double digits in this one. But the

0:59:55.200 --> 0:59:57.920
<v Speaker 1>Rams have only allowed four wide receiver touchdowns all seasons.

0:59:57.920 --> 1:00:00.760
<v Speaker 1>So don't get your hopes too high with Hopkins this week.

1:00:01.280 --> 1:00:03.360
<v Speaker 1>And you probably shouldn't have any hopes for will Fuller.

1:00:03.480 --> 1:00:06.080
<v Speaker 1>I'll give him a very very tentative see just to

1:00:06.120 --> 1:00:08.960
<v Speaker 1>see if you can actually don't put him on the bench.

1:00:09.040 --> 1:00:12.360
<v Speaker 1>Screw it. Targets last week alright, had just two catches.

1:00:12.560 --> 1:00:15.240
<v Speaker 1>Savage is not good. Uh. The one thing that maybe

1:00:15.280 --> 1:00:17.440
<v Speaker 1>going for that Fuller has going for him is all

1:00:17.520 --> 1:00:19.800
<v Speaker 1>four touchdowns that the Rams have allowed to wide receivers

1:00:19.840 --> 1:00:22.840
<v Speaker 1>have gone to secondary options. But I'm just not liking

1:00:22.920 --> 1:00:25.080
<v Speaker 1>him a lot with Savage under center. Are you saying

1:00:25.120 --> 1:00:28.080
<v Speaker 1>Savage is not macho? Yeah? I'm not even gonna voice

1:00:28.120 --> 1:00:31.520
<v Speaker 1>in this one. I'm just so no one knowing likes

1:00:31.560 --> 1:00:34.240
<v Speaker 1>Tom Savage right now? Who has? And he's stock in

1:00:34.280 --> 1:00:36.800
<v Speaker 1>the Texans. I do like c J. Fiedoroitz, so he

1:00:36.880 --> 1:00:39.000
<v Speaker 1>just might take a chance of a receiver. Giants tight

1:00:39.080 --> 1:00:41.240
<v Speaker 1>ends a twelve targets against the Rams last week, so

1:00:41.360 --> 1:00:44.280
<v Speaker 1>Fedor Wooz could see some volume Tom Savages on the bench.

1:00:44.520 --> 1:00:46.400
<v Speaker 1>The Rams are top ten against the past with having

1:00:46.440 --> 1:00:48.800
<v Speaker 1>just a hundred seventy six yards per game over their

1:00:48.800 --> 1:00:52.200
<v Speaker 1>past five games, just five total passing touchdowns during that span,

1:00:52.640 --> 1:00:55.160
<v Speaker 1>and I'll give Lamar Miller as ce. The Rams are

1:00:55.240 --> 1:00:57.880
<v Speaker 1>fifth worst against the run. Miller is a borderline b

1:00:58.120 --> 1:01:00.520
<v Speaker 1>but he just doesn't put up big numbers. I know,

1:01:00.640 --> 1:01:02.920
<v Speaker 1>threat from the passing game, no threat from the passing game.

1:01:02.960 --> 1:01:05.920
<v Speaker 1>I threw allowing four point six yards per carry. Are

1:01:05.960 --> 1:01:08.080
<v Speaker 1>the Rams only two teams have failed to rush for

1:01:08.080 --> 1:01:10.520
<v Speaker 1>a hundred yards or score a touchdown against them this year,

1:01:10.840 --> 1:01:14.080
<v Speaker 1>so Miller is certainly startable. Over to his counterpart at

1:01:14.120 --> 1:01:16.400
<v Speaker 1>running back on the l A side, Todd Gurley gets

1:01:16.400 --> 1:01:19.360
<v Speaker 1>an A despite Houston being ranked second against the run,

1:01:19.800 --> 1:01:21.560
<v Speaker 1>But when you look further into that, they faced the

1:01:21.640 --> 1:01:26.600
<v Speaker 1>uninspiring backfields of Cincinnati, New England, Cleveland, Seattle in Indianapolis

1:01:26.720 --> 1:01:30.080
<v Speaker 1>lately girly averaging touches and a hundred twenty eight combo

1:01:30.200 --> 1:01:33.720
<v Speaker 1>yards per game. He's an obvious bell cow auto start. Um.

1:01:33.920 --> 1:01:35.920
<v Speaker 1>I like the receivers for sure. For l A. I'm

1:01:35.960 --> 1:01:38.760
<v Speaker 1>gonna give each one of the Sammy Watkins, Robert Woods

1:01:38.800 --> 1:01:42.520
<v Speaker 1>and Cooper Cup. Uh. We'll start with what Watkins great

1:01:42.600 --> 1:01:45.680
<v Speaker 1>matchup here? Probably the high Watkins probably has the highest

1:01:45.680 --> 1:01:48.160
<v Speaker 1>ceiling but certainly the lowest floor. But the Texans have

1:01:48.240 --> 1:01:51.120
<v Speaker 1>allowed five different wide receivers to top fifty yards and

1:01:51.200 --> 1:01:53.400
<v Speaker 1>three to top one hundred yards over the last two

1:01:53.480 --> 1:01:56.080
<v Speaker 1>games alone. So you gotta like Robert Woods, who leads

1:01:56.080 --> 1:01:58.880
<v Speaker 1>the rams and targets receptions and receiving yards, and and

1:01:59.040 --> 1:02:01.400
<v Speaker 1>Robert Woods is a bol so you're this is the

1:02:01.520 --> 1:02:04.880
<v Speaker 1>highest scoring offense in the NFL. And Robert Woods leads

1:02:04.960 --> 1:02:07.760
<v Speaker 1>the team and targets receptions and yards, and he's available

1:02:07.880 --> 1:02:12.400
<v Speaker 1>right now on that team. Well, well, I think he

1:02:12.440 --> 1:02:14.480
<v Speaker 1>only has the two touchdowns he scored last week. I

1:02:14.600 --> 1:02:17.840
<v Speaker 1>think he might have three. But yeah, it's you know,

1:02:17.960 --> 1:02:20.440
<v Speaker 1>it's ridiculous that he's available in so many leagues. Anybody

1:02:20.480 --> 1:02:23.280
<v Speaker 1>else think this could be the Watkins breakout game? It's

1:02:23.320 --> 1:02:26.920
<v Speaker 1>worth rolling it kind of is. He's so overdue for

1:02:27.000 --> 1:02:31.080
<v Speaker 1>a big game and uh, Cooper cup real quick second

1:02:31.160 --> 1:02:33.080
<v Speaker 1>in the NFL and red zone targets. He's certainly is

1:02:33.080 --> 1:02:35.000
<v Speaker 1>a factor there, So I like him as well. Uh,

1:02:35.240 --> 1:02:37.920
<v Speaker 1>you can't and you can start Tyler Higbee. I'll give

1:02:38.000 --> 1:02:40.600
<v Speaker 1>him to see. The Texans are the sixth worst defense

1:02:40.600 --> 1:02:43.080
<v Speaker 1>against tight ends, allowing six catches and sixty two yards

1:02:43.120 --> 1:02:45.600
<v Speaker 1>per game to the position. And for all these reasons,

1:02:45.720 --> 1:02:49.480
<v Speaker 1>Jared Goff and obvious a Houston has allowed has allowed

1:02:49.520 --> 1:02:51.400
<v Speaker 1>four of the last six quarterbacks they face to go

1:02:51.480 --> 1:02:54.000
<v Speaker 1>over three yards and throw for multiple touchdowns. The two

1:02:54.080 --> 1:02:56.960
<v Speaker 1>that didn't were Kevin Hogan and the Marcus Mariotta Matt

1:02:57.120 --> 1:03:01.280
<v Speaker 1>Castle combo. A couple of weeks ago, the way the

1:03:01.320 --> 1:03:04.040
<v Speaker 1>way that you were ended that sense, it sounded like

1:03:04.080 --> 1:03:07.600
<v Speaker 1>there might be more so the other team, but then

1:03:09.320 --> 1:03:11.680
<v Speaker 1>I won't do the Texans again. Thank you. We already

1:03:11.720 --> 1:03:14.520
<v Speaker 1>we already survived that one once. It's early Cowboys take

1:03:14.560 --> 1:03:16.480
<v Speaker 1>on the Falcons. No Zeke. What do you think of

1:03:16.520 --> 1:03:19.920
<v Speaker 1>the running back situation there, Matt? Just in case if

1:03:20.000 --> 1:03:22.439
<v Speaker 1>Zeke is suddenly not suspended, I just want to mention

1:03:22.560 --> 1:03:26.480
<v Speaker 1>he's an a start. Thank you. Uh. I'm I got

1:03:26.520 --> 1:03:28.880
<v Speaker 1>Alfred Morris and Darren McFadden on the bench. If that

1:03:28.960 --> 1:03:30.760
<v Speaker 1>doesn't change, I think you're headed for a three headed

1:03:30.800 --> 1:03:34.880
<v Speaker 1>rushing attack. Morris will probably end up with around twelve touches.

1:03:35.160 --> 1:03:37.760
<v Speaker 1>McFadden will probably get six to eight. Rod Smith is

1:03:37.800 --> 1:03:39.479
<v Speaker 1>to take a chance on me, guy that I would

1:03:39.520 --> 1:03:41.919
<v Speaker 1>want to play. I think I'll think McFadden even gets

1:03:41.960 --> 1:03:44.120
<v Speaker 1>the sixth eight. I think that's Rod Smith. Now it

1:03:44.200 --> 1:03:46.000
<v Speaker 1>could be. I think Smith's gonna be second in the

1:03:46.120 --> 1:03:48.560
<v Speaker 1>in the in the eating order, he may be second

1:03:48.600 --> 1:03:50.640
<v Speaker 1>in command. But Deak Prescott I think is the best

1:03:50.760 --> 1:03:53.200
<v Speaker 1>runner in this game. He gets an a. The Falcons

1:03:53.240 --> 1:03:55.920
<v Speaker 1>have allowed the tenth most rushing yards to the quarterback

1:03:55.960 --> 1:03:58.800
<v Speaker 1>position this year, and maybe the lack of Zeke and

1:03:58.840 --> 1:04:01.280
<v Speaker 1>an injury to dead his forces Dak to call his

1:04:01.320 --> 1:04:03.520
<v Speaker 1>own number near the goal line this week. In fact,

1:04:03.640 --> 1:04:06.560
<v Speaker 1>you know what, I'm gonna call it, Dak Prescott rushing

1:04:06.640 --> 1:04:09.440
<v Speaker 1>touchdown this week. I think he leads all quarterbacks in

1:04:09.520 --> 1:04:14.760
<v Speaker 1>rushing yardage this year. Dez Bryant slash Terrence Williams. If healthy,

1:04:15.760 --> 1:04:18.040
<v Speaker 1>des is a B. Williams is a SEA. But both

1:04:18.080 --> 1:04:21.320
<v Speaker 1>are dealing with ankle injuries. If Bryant doesn't go, Williams

1:04:21.520 --> 1:04:23.840
<v Speaker 1>might be bumped up to a B. If both don't go,

1:04:24.280 --> 1:04:27.040
<v Speaker 1>I'm gonna look at Bryce Butler, who's averaging eighteen point

1:04:27.120 --> 1:04:29.800
<v Speaker 1>six yards per carry, and he's caught five touchdowns from

1:04:29.880 --> 1:04:32.720
<v Speaker 1>Dak over the last two years. If either is ruled out,

1:04:32.840 --> 1:04:35.640
<v Speaker 1>I'll move Butler up to a SEA. But if both go,

1:04:35.880 --> 1:04:38.120
<v Speaker 1>I don't think that I'd play him. Dak Prescott is

1:04:38.160 --> 1:04:41.480
<v Speaker 1>six the monst quarterbacks in rushing yards. Sorry, not even

1:04:41.520 --> 1:04:45.200
<v Speaker 1>close to first. Incorrect. We're not gonna where he's number

1:04:45.240 --> 1:04:48.560
<v Speaker 1>one rushing touchdown. There we go. Four rushing touchdowns for

1:04:48.640 --> 1:04:52.480
<v Speaker 1>Dak Prescott one five this week, maybe even six, not

1:04:52.800 --> 1:04:55.960
<v Speaker 1>six touchdowns this week. No, I might get number five

1:04:56.000 --> 1:04:58.800
<v Speaker 1>and number six. We're not gonna chase Cole Beasley's two

1:04:58.840 --> 1:05:01.080
<v Speaker 1>red zone touchdown past is last week because he only

1:05:01.160 --> 1:05:04.240
<v Speaker 1>has eleven targets over the last three games and Jason

1:05:04.280 --> 1:05:06.320
<v Speaker 1>Witten is on the bench. It's true that injuries and

1:05:06.360 --> 1:05:08.840
<v Speaker 1>suspensions could mean a few more looks for Witten, but

1:05:08.960 --> 1:05:11.680
<v Speaker 1>he's facing a defense that's allowing four catches and forty

1:05:11.720 --> 1:05:15.320
<v Speaker 1>eight yards to tight ends this season. On the Atlanta side,

1:05:15.400 --> 1:05:17.920
<v Speaker 1>I got Davante Freeman with a B and Tevin Coleman

1:05:17.960 --> 1:05:20.080
<v Speaker 1>with a C. Freeman has been held to twelve or

1:05:20.160 --> 1:05:23.280
<v Speaker 1>fewer carries in every game since Week four. That's kind

1:05:23.280 --> 1:05:26.280
<v Speaker 1>of surprising. And Dallas is only allowing eighty rush yards

1:05:26.320 --> 1:05:29.400
<v Speaker 1>per game to the running back position. Still, the Cowboys

1:05:29.440 --> 1:05:32.320
<v Speaker 1>are allowing the seventh most receptions and receiving yards to

1:05:32.400 --> 1:05:35.160
<v Speaker 1>rush to running backs, and I thought that i'd find

1:05:35.240 --> 1:05:38.360
<v Speaker 1>Tevin Coleman was leading more more of the receiving categories.

1:05:38.520 --> 1:05:42.320
<v Speaker 1>It's like completely even just about by like one or

1:05:42.400 --> 1:05:45.320
<v Speaker 1>two in every category. So that's why Freeman gets the

1:05:45.400 --> 1:05:48.120
<v Speaker 1>B and Coleman gets the SEA because Freeman just gets

1:05:48.160 --> 1:05:51.160
<v Speaker 1>more touches. Matt Ryan gets a B. It's a home

1:05:51.240 --> 1:05:53.920
<v Speaker 1>game against the bottom ten defense. Dallas has allowed the

1:05:54.040 --> 1:05:57.000
<v Speaker 1>tenth most passing touchdowns in the eighth worst passer rating

1:05:57.080 --> 1:06:00.640
<v Speaker 1>in the league. Defensively, Julio Jones gets an A. Do

1:06:00.720 --> 1:06:03.440
<v Speaker 1>you think Julio Jones is thinking fondly of his season

1:06:03.520 --> 1:06:06.560
<v Speaker 1>high hundred and eighteen yards last week? I think he's

1:06:06.600 --> 1:06:09.400
<v Speaker 1>thinking of the easiest touchdown pass that ever dropped in

1:06:09.480 --> 1:06:13.240
<v Speaker 1>the world. He's he's got a revenge game against himself

1:06:13.360 --> 1:06:15.320
<v Speaker 1>this week, and he's going to score a touchdown this week.

1:06:15.840 --> 1:06:18.280
<v Speaker 1>Mohammedson new I'm giving a B to the Cowboys have

1:06:18.400 --> 1:06:21.680
<v Speaker 1>been specifically bad against slot receivers and woos running about

1:06:21.720 --> 1:06:25.520
<v Speaker 1>two thirds of his routes from the slot. Uh Larry Fitzgerald,

1:06:25.600 --> 1:06:28.640
<v Speaker 1>Jamison Crowder, Cooper cup Sterling Shepherd all had big days

1:06:28.680 --> 1:06:31.200
<v Speaker 1>out of the slot against the Cowboys. Lastly, I'll mention

1:06:31.280 --> 1:06:35.080
<v Speaker 1>Austin Hooper. He's not a good play because his name

1:06:35.240 --> 1:06:39.160
<v Speaker 1>is not Travis Kelsey. Non. Travis Kelsey tight ends have

1:06:39.360 --> 1:06:42.000
<v Speaker 1>only scored once this year against the Cowboys, and Dallas

1:06:42.080 --> 1:06:46.120
<v Speaker 1>hasn't allowed Non Kelsey's two top fifty two yards this season.

1:06:46.240 --> 1:06:49.400
<v Speaker 1>So did Jason Ken Jason Kelsey do against He didn't

1:06:49.440 --> 1:06:51.920
<v Speaker 1>do that. Well, OK, it's not even a matter. You

1:06:52.240 --> 1:06:54.000
<v Speaker 1>can't just be a Kelsey, you have to be a

1:06:54.120 --> 1:06:58.680
<v Speaker 1>Travis Kelsey. That's true. At that Bengals take on the Titans,

1:06:59.480 --> 1:07:02.520
<v Speaker 1>I think we squeeze. Uh uh, Nope, We're not gonna

1:07:02.520 --> 1:07:04.280
<v Speaker 1>do it. We're gonna take a break, and when we

1:07:04.360 --> 1:07:07.720
<v Speaker 1>come back Bengals taking on the Titans, we'll tell you

1:07:07.760 --> 1:07:09.360
<v Speaker 1>if you can, if you can go back to the

1:07:09.400 --> 1:07:13.080
<v Speaker 1>well with Andy Dalton after the crappy, crappy game he

1:07:13.160 --> 1:07:17.280
<v Speaker 1>put up against the Jaguars. When we return your distinctive

1:07:17.360 --> 1:07:35.800
<v Speaker 1>Fantasy Football Weekly on the Fan, Welcome back to the show.

1:07:36.080 --> 1:07:40.840
<v Speaker 1>Final segments of Fantasy Football Weekly. I'm the fans. Let's

1:07:41.160 --> 1:07:45.240
<v Speaker 1>let's knock down our last couple of Oh jeez, yeah,

1:07:45.280 --> 1:07:47.720
<v Speaker 1>we have three matchups to go. We gotta zip through

1:07:47.800 --> 1:07:51.520
<v Speaker 1>these Bengals taking on the Titans. Uh aj Green's and

1:07:51.560 --> 1:07:53.800
<v Speaker 1>obviously I'm not gonna expand on that. We'll go to

1:07:53.960 --> 1:07:56.280
<v Speaker 1>Andy Dalton, who was a b prior to running into

1:07:56.400 --> 1:08:00.440
<v Speaker 1>the Jacksonville buzz saw last week, and they humble everybody.

1:08:00.960 --> 1:08:03.720
<v Speaker 1>He was averaging. Dalton was averaging two hundred forty yards

1:08:03.840 --> 1:08:06.960
<v Speaker 1>and two point two touchdowns in the Bill Laser offensive

1:08:07.000 --> 1:08:11.040
<v Speaker 1>coordinator era. He faced the Titans defense that's seen some

1:08:11.160 --> 1:08:13.800
<v Speaker 1>of the worst quarterbacking in the league of late Joe

1:08:13.880 --> 1:08:17.160
<v Speaker 1>Flacco and DeShawn Kaiser and Cody Kessler and Jacoby Brissette

1:08:17.160 --> 1:08:21.040
<v Speaker 1>and Jake Cutler. The last two competent quarterbacks that the

1:08:21.160 --> 1:08:25.000
<v Speaker 1>Titans faced, Deshaun Watson and Russell Wilson each through for

1:08:25.240 --> 1:08:28.880
<v Speaker 1>four touchdowns against the Titans secondary. I think Dalton's sitting

1:08:28.880 --> 1:08:31.320
<v Speaker 1>on potentially a very nice game here. B grade for him,

1:08:31.880 --> 1:08:36.000
<v Speaker 1>B grade for Tyler Croft. He has successfully replaced Tyler

1:08:36.120 --> 1:08:38.920
<v Speaker 1>Eiffort in the over the last five weeks. He's averaged

1:08:39.160 --> 1:08:42.040
<v Speaker 1>four catches fifty two yards and he's caught almost a

1:08:42.120 --> 1:08:45.719
<v Speaker 1>touchdown per game. That is solid tight end production. Production

1:08:45.760 --> 1:08:47.479
<v Speaker 1>in a year where it's hard to find that he

1:08:47.840 --> 1:08:51.120
<v Speaker 1>faces an average tight end Titans defense against tight ends.

1:08:51.479 --> 1:08:53.400
<v Speaker 1>But I think there's a game plan here that's going

1:08:53.439 --> 1:08:56.720
<v Speaker 1>to be strongly emphasizing the passing game, which brings us

1:08:56.760 --> 1:08:59.479
<v Speaker 1>to Joe Mixon and why he's only a C grade here.

1:08:59.680 --> 1:09:02.439
<v Speaker 1>Ay he's averaging just two point nine yards per carry,

1:09:02.479 --> 1:09:05.760
<v Speaker 1>which is brutal. He has top sixty rushing yards one

1:09:05.880 --> 1:09:08.599
<v Speaker 1>time all year, and the Titans, coming with a good

1:09:08.720 --> 1:09:14.200
<v Speaker 1>run defense, their top ten in rushing touchdowns allowed yards

1:09:14.280 --> 1:09:17.120
<v Speaker 1>per rush against They're giving up just three point four

1:09:17.240 --> 1:09:20.439
<v Speaker 1>yards per carry. Jeremy Hill is out for this game,

1:09:20.520 --> 1:09:22.200
<v Speaker 1>and that does help makes it a little bit. If

1:09:22.280 --> 1:09:23.840
<v Speaker 1>there are any goal line carries to be had, he

1:09:23.840 --> 1:09:25.960
<v Speaker 1>would get them. And that's largely why he gets a

1:09:26.000 --> 1:09:29.600
<v Speaker 1>C grade here. And if I'm nervous about mixing, I

1:09:29.720 --> 1:09:32.000
<v Speaker 1>like his backup Giovanni Bernard, even less he's on the bench.

1:09:32.080 --> 1:09:34.120
<v Speaker 1>Let's go to the Tennessee side of this or I've

1:09:34.160 --> 1:09:36.040
<v Speaker 1>got a handful of Sea grades, and that is it

1:09:36.439 --> 1:09:39.479
<v Speaker 1>will start with the passing game. Marcus Mariotte is actually

1:09:39.520 --> 1:09:42.439
<v Speaker 1>on the bench. It's a tough matchup against Cincinnati. They

1:09:42.479 --> 1:09:45.719
<v Speaker 1>ranked third in passing yards allowed opposing quarterbacks averaging barely

1:09:45.800 --> 1:09:50.840
<v Speaker 1>one touchdown per game against the Cincinnati Bengals. Now is

1:09:50.880 --> 1:09:53.760
<v Speaker 1>Hamsting is healed, um, But I don't think the legs

1:09:53.840 --> 1:09:56.080
<v Speaker 1>help here. The the Bengals have seen a bunch of

1:09:56.160 --> 1:09:59.479
<v Speaker 1>mobile quarterbacks this year, Aaron Rodgers and DeShawn Kyser and

1:09:59.560 --> 1:10:05.040
<v Speaker 1>Tyrode Tailor and Jacoby Brissette, and they averaged ten scoreless

1:10:05.240 --> 1:10:08.160
<v Speaker 1>rushing yards. So you're only gonna get what Marcus Mariota's

1:10:08.200 --> 1:10:09.800
<v Speaker 1>arm can give you. And I don't think it's gonna

1:10:09.800 --> 1:10:12.680
<v Speaker 1>be that much. That's part of why Corey Davis is

1:10:12.720 --> 1:10:15.280
<v Speaker 1>down to a sea level. Got his feet what last

1:10:15.360 --> 1:10:18.439
<v Speaker 1>week after missing seven games and knocked some rustoff. Kind

1:10:18.479 --> 1:10:20.840
<v Speaker 1>Of like him because he should match up against Adam Jones,

1:10:20.840 --> 1:10:23.840
<v Speaker 1>who Pro Football Focus ranks as their ninety one cornerback.

1:10:24.160 --> 1:10:29.400
<v Speaker 1>Richard Matthews barely a C grade here right side receivers,

1:10:29.439 --> 1:10:32.040
<v Speaker 1>which he primarily is. I've had some luck because they're

1:10:32.040 --> 1:10:35.920
<v Speaker 1>getting Drake Kirkpatrick, who ranks at Pro football Focus. So

1:10:36.720 --> 1:10:39.599
<v Speaker 1>I'm lukewarm on Richard Matthews, but you know his bed.

1:10:39.680 --> 1:10:43.320
<v Speaker 1>He's sixty seventy yards every game, and that's not so bad.

1:10:43.800 --> 1:10:47.559
<v Speaker 1>Delaney Walker gets a C grade. Cincinnatis allowed a forty

1:10:47.720 --> 1:10:49.960
<v Speaker 1>nine yard game or better to tight ends in three

1:10:50.000 --> 1:10:51.880
<v Speaker 1>straight games. I like that. Walker is still not close

1:10:51.960 --> 1:10:55.360
<v Speaker 1>to healthy, though he has seen four or more targets

1:10:55.400 --> 1:10:57.800
<v Speaker 1>every game, so volume alone might be okay here, but

1:10:58.240 --> 1:11:01.040
<v Speaker 1>hasn't scored a touchdown this season. None for your guy,

1:11:01.120 --> 1:11:04.320
<v Speaker 1>mat Delaney Walker. Last night, I dropped him in several leagues.

1:11:04.479 --> 1:11:06.599
<v Speaker 1>I don't blame me. He's not my guy anymore. Murray

1:11:06.680 --> 1:11:09.160
<v Speaker 1>and Henry the running backs for Tennessee are on the bench.

1:11:09.600 --> 1:11:13.600
<v Speaker 1>Murray narrowly outtouched Henry last week, but Henry got the touchdowns.

1:11:13.640 --> 1:11:16.280
<v Speaker 1>And every week we talked about this in five hot questions.

1:11:16.360 --> 1:11:19.000
<v Speaker 1>It's it's always a nightmare to figure out who it's

1:11:19.000 --> 1:11:21.400
<v Speaker 1>going to be. It's a it's a timeshare, and it's

1:11:21.439 --> 1:11:24.840
<v Speaker 1>a Cincinnati defense that's only allowed d rusher and only

1:11:24.920 --> 1:11:29.200
<v Speaker 1>two rushing scores all season. So I don't know how

1:11:29.280 --> 1:11:31.559
<v Speaker 1>you find I don't know how you could guess which one,

1:11:31.640 --> 1:11:33.599
<v Speaker 1>if either is going to get anything done this week.

1:11:33.680 --> 1:11:39.840
<v Speaker 1>So let's avoid both. Next Patriots taking on the Broncos. Uh,

1:11:40.040 --> 1:11:42.000
<v Speaker 1>normally we would just say start all your Patriots, but

1:11:42.040 --> 1:11:43.840
<v Speaker 1>it's a tricky matchup. What do you think it's a

1:11:43.840 --> 1:11:46.640
<v Speaker 1>little tricky. Start with Tom Brady, who gets to be uh,

1:11:47.000 --> 1:11:49.800
<v Speaker 1>pretty pretty bad history against the Broncos, who last year

1:11:49.800 --> 1:11:52.679
<v Speaker 1>allowed a mean or twelve passing touchdowns. This year, they've

1:11:52.680 --> 1:11:55.679
<v Speaker 1>allowed sixteen passing touchdowns so far, though only two teams

1:11:55.720 --> 1:11:58.599
<v Speaker 1>have allowed more than that. So Brady, you're gonna start him. Obviously,

1:11:59.080 --> 1:12:01.519
<v Speaker 1>You're definitely starting Bob Gronkowski, though he gets an A.

1:12:02.120 --> 1:12:04.160
<v Speaker 1>In his last four meetings with Denver, he has finished

1:12:04.200 --> 1:12:06.639
<v Speaker 1>with no fewer than eighty eight yards and a touchdown.

1:12:06.920 --> 1:12:09.280
<v Speaker 1>When that's your bad game, eight eight yards in a touchdown,

1:12:09.360 --> 1:12:11.080
<v Speaker 1>you're you're in You're in a good spot. Denver is

1:12:11.080 --> 1:12:13.400
<v Speaker 1>allowed the second most receiving yards and fourth most catches,

1:12:13.439 --> 1:12:15.960
<v Speaker 1>So Gronk is an easy start. Brandon Cooks not not

1:12:16.120 --> 1:12:18.519
<v Speaker 1>so easy. Even with Chris Hogan out, he has been

1:12:18.600 --> 1:12:21.479
<v Speaker 1>ruled out. The Broncos have allowed the fewest receptions and

1:12:21.600 --> 1:12:23.479
<v Speaker 1>yards to wide receivers this year. They have a lot

1:12:23.520 --> 1:12:26.280
<v Speaker 1>of fair amount of touchdowns, but Cooks really hasn't made

1:12:26.280 --> 1:12:28.040
<v Speaker 1>a factor in the realm and not at all, So

1:12:28.160 --> 1:12:29.960
<v Speaker 1>I'm not liking this match up a whole lot for him.

1:12:30.000 --> 1:12:32.720
<v Speaker 1>I'm really not liking it for Damni m Amndola. If

1:12:32.760 --> 1:12:35.120
<v Speaker 1>he even plays with that shoulder injury, he'll see a

1:12:35.160 --> 1:12:38.400
<v Speaker 1>lot of Chris Harris and the slot. So I got

1:12:38.439 --> 1:12:40.479
<v Speaker 1>Amundola on the bench, and I'm not getting cute with

1:12:40.479 --> 1:12:43.760
<v Speaker 1>Philip Dorset or anything like that. With Chris Hogan out, Uh,

1:12:44.000 --> 1:12:45.920
<v Speaker 1>it doesn't get much better for the running backs. I

1:12:45.920 --> 1:12:49.360
<v Speaker 1>didn't give Dion Lewis and James White both the sea. Uh.

1:12:49.640 --> 1:12:52.040
<v Speaker 1>Speaking to Lewis, he led the team and carries for

1:12:52.400 --> 1:12:54.559
<v Speaker 1>the third straight week last week. He's averaging four point

1:12:54.600 --> 1:12:56.920
<v Speaker 1>seven yards per carry. But Denver is giving up the

1:12:56.960 --> 1:12:58.720
<v Speaker 1>fourth the US yards per game to running backs and

1:12:58.760 --> 1:13:00.599
<v Speaker 1>have only allowed three rushing touch downs on the years

1:13:00.600 --> 1:13:02.599
<v Speaker 1>of Not a great matchup for lewis not a great

1:13:02.640 --> 1:13:06.200
<v Speaker 1>matchup for James White either, but um Denver has surrendered

1:13:06.240 --> 1:13:08.320
<v Speaker 1>three scores through the air to running backs, which is

1:13:08.360 --> 1:13:10.080
<v Speaker 1>tied for the second most in the league. And James

1:13:10.160 --> 1:13:12.639
<v Speaker 1>White has seen eight red zone targets, which is tied

1:13:12.680 --> 1:13:15.519
<v Speaker 1>for second among running backs. And Mike Gilsli real quick

1:13:15.720 --> 1:13:18.720
<v Speaker 1>on the bench obviously, hasn't scored since Week two and

1:13:18.800 --> 1:13:21.200
<v Speaker 1>has just two carries from inside the five yard line

1:13:21.240 --> 1:13:23.160
<v Speaker 1>in the six games since then. He is just I

1:13:23.200 --> 1:13:26.240
<v Speaker 1>think he's been dropped in mostly and uh quickly to

1:13:26.439 --> 1:13:28.800
<v Speaker 1>Denver's side to Mary's Thomas gets it be. New England

1:13:28.840 --> 1:13:31.240
<v Speaker 1>has allowed these second most yards per game to wide receivers.

1:13:31.280 --> 1:13:33.720
<v Speaker 1>They've also given up either one hundred yards or a

1:13:33.840 --> 1:13:36.120
<v Speaker 1>touchdown to a wide receiver in every game this season.

1:13:36.600 --> 1:13:39.080
<v Speaker 1>Uh Manuel Sander is gonna give him a c despite

1:13:39.120 --> 1:13:41.800
<v Speaker 1>only catching one ball from Brock Oswiler last week. New

1:13:41.840 --> 1:13:44.120
<v Speaker 1>England allows these second most yards per game two receivers

1:13:44.160 --> 1:13:46.360
<v Speaker 1>as I just said, and the fourth most plays of

1:13:46.439 --> 1:13:48.720
<v Speaker 1>twenty plus yards, so Sanders should be more of a

1:13:48.760 --> 1:13:51.960
<v Speaker 1>factor here. I'm benching brock Oswiler despite the fact New

1:13:52.000 --> 1:13:54.519
<v Speaker 1>England has allowed three nine yards and two touchdowns per

1:13:54.640 --> 1:13:57.800
<v Speaker 1>game to opposing quarterbacks. He's brock Oswiler. He's on the bench.

1:13:58.320 --> 1:14:01.200
<v Speaker 1>So c J. Anderson Patriots of bottom ten against running

1:14:01.200 --> 1:14:03.439
<v Speaker 1>backs in and have allowed at least eighty total yards

1:14:03.680 --> 1:14:05.599
<v Speaker 1>to each of the last four backs that they faced.

1:14:05.680 --> 1:14:08.719
<v Speaker 1>But CJ's is loo bad. He's average a meter thirty

1:14:08.720 --> 1:14:11.320
<v Speaker 1>eight rushing yards per game over his last four. His

1:14:11.439 --> 1:14:14.560
<v Speaker 1>snap count has dropped for seven straight weeks, and I

1:14:14.680 --> 1:14:16.840
<v Speaker 1>like DeVante Booker more. Now he gets the sea, He's

1:14:16.840 --> 1:14:19.160
<v Speaker 1>gonna leap frogs TJ on the depth chart. In this game.

1:14:19.560 --> 1:14:22.240
<v Speaker 1>He's averaging four targets per game over his last four,

1:14:22.479 --> 1:14:25.320
<v Speaker 1>He's averaging five yards per carry. New England is allowing

1:14:25.360 --> 1:14:27.560
<v Speaker 1>nearly six catches per game, so Booker can be a

1:14:27.640 --> 1:14:30.320
<v Speaker 1>PPR helper here. Alright, Let's go to our final matchup,

1:14:30.360 --> 1:14:32.800
<v Speaker 1>and that's the Dolphins at the Panthers. Matt, you already

1:14:32.840 --> 1:14:35.880
<v Speaker 1>told us you like quarterback Jay Cutler, and this one, yeah,

1:14:37.000 --> 1:14:39.080
<v Speaker 1>I do like to quarterback Jay Cutler. He he got

1:14:39.160 --> 1:14:41.200
<v Speaker 1>a b out of me. I got bees on DeVante

1:14:41.280 --> 1:14:43.800
<v Speaker 1>Parker and Jarvis Landry as well. Parker is finally healthy

1:14:43.840 --> 1:14:47.040
<v Speaker 1>and we have a kindler gentler Cutler chucking him the

1:14:47.080 --> 1:14:50.000
<v Speaker 1>ball everywhere. They might be a spread offense soon. Parker

1:14:50.080 --> 1:14:53.320
<v Speaker 1>has eight or more targets in every game that he's

1:14:53.360 --> 1:14:56.000
<v Speaker 1>finished this season, and he's hit the sixty nine yard

1:14:56.120 --> 1:14:59.080
<v Speaker 1>mark in each of his four complete games. Landry's at

1:14:59.120 --> 1:15:01.639
<v Speaker 1>double digit target in every game but to the season

1:15:01.880 --> 1:15:04.240
<v Speaker 1>and at least five receptions in every game this year

1:15:04.280 --> 1:15:06.559
<v Speaker 1>and scored in four of his last five. They're both

1:15:06.640 --> 1:15:08.760
<v Speaker 1>volume plays, and I think Cutler is going to throw

1:15:08.840 --> 1:15:12.160
<v Speaker 1>in this one. The running game Kenyan Drake and Damien Williams.

1:15:12.200 --> 1:15:15.000
<v Speaker 1>I got him on the bench. They're splitting touches almost evenly,

1:15:15.439 --> 1:15:17.920
<v Speaker 1>fifteen to thirteen in favor of Drake last week. And

1:15:17.960 --> 1:15:19.600
<v Speaker 1>as much as I like both of these guys in

1:15:19.640 --> 1:15:23.040
<v Speaker 1>a PPR format, this isn't the matchup. Tarik Cohen had

1:15:23.080 --> 1:15:25.880
<v Speaker 1>one seventy yard reception against the Panthers earlier this season.

1:15:26.080 --> 1:15:28.759
<v Speaker 1>If you take that away, the Panthers are only allowing

1:15:28.840 --> 1:15:31.320
<v Speaker 1>thirty three receiving yards per game to running back, so

1:15:31.360 --> 1:15:33.800
<v Speaker 1>they're both on the bench. Over on the other side,

1:15:33.880 --> 1:15:38.479
<v Speaker 1>Christian McCaffrey is the fantasy unicorn because he's strange, mystical.

1:15:38.960 --> 1:15:40.640
<v Speaker 1>I don't know how to feel about him, but he

1:15:40.720 --> 1:15:43.840
<v Speaker 1>makes magic happen. He's got at least five catches in

1:15:43.960 --> 1:15:47.679
<v Speaker 1>five straight games, but only sixty five total yards per game.

1:15:47.800 --> 1:15:50.439
<v Speaker 1>But he scored in three of his last five. And

1:15:50.520 --> 1:15:53.960
<v Speaker 1>the Panthers are trying to distribute the vacated Calvin Benjamin targets,

1:15:54.000 --> 1:15:56.200
<v Speaker 1>and a lot of them are going mccatholicks. They're also

1:15:56.320 --> 1:16:00.840
<v Speaker 1>vacating James Jonathan Stewart carries after the two fumbles, and

1:16:00.880 --> 1:16:03.000
<v Speaker 1>he's averaging like two yards a carry. I think they

1:16:03.040 --> 1:16:06.880
<v Speaker 1>should send Jonathan Stewart on a vacucit and and because

1:16:07.040 --> 1:16:09.000
<v Speaker 1>his age seems to have caught him caught up with him.

1:16:09.040 --> 1:16:11.639
<v Speaker 1>He's averaging under two yards per carry in his last

1:16:11.720 --> 1:16:14.679
<v Speaker 1>five games. Cam Newton, I'm giving him a B grade.

1:16:14.720 --> 1:16:17.280
<v Speaker 1>Over his last six games, he's averaging nine carries and

1:16:17.360 --> 1:16:20.120
<v Speaker 1>fifty rushing yards per game. He's actually their best running back.

1:16:20.800 --> 1:16:23.200
<v Speaker 1>He has twice as many rushing touchdowns as the rest

1:16:23.240 --> 1:16:26.360
<v Speaker 1>of the team. Combined. Granted it's only four to two,

1:16:26.520 --> 1:16:30.360
<v Speaker 1>but that's still something. He's only averaging five passing yards

1:16:30.400 --> 1:16:32.439
<v Speaker 1>per game, but it's the rushing that's making you money here,

1:16:32.479 --> 1:16:35.000
<v Speaker 1>and so Newton's will be And Devin Funcious is the

1:16:35.080 --> 1:16:37.040
<v Speaker 1>last guy I'll mention. I give him a B grade.

1:16:37.240 --> 1:16:40.439
<v Speaker 1>All three of Funcioses touchdowns came in two games in

1:16:40.520 --> 1:16:44.040
<v Speaker 1>which Carolina scored twenty seven or more points. So when

1:16:44.080 --> 1:16:47.479
<v Speaker 1>they're scoring in bunches, you start funches. And the Dolphins

1:16:47.520 --> 1:16:50.479
<v Speaker 1>have allowed twenty seven or more points in three straight games,

1:16:51.000 --> 1:16:53.080
<v Speaker 1>So this is going to be another one of those games.

1:16:53.320 --> 1:16:55.200
<v Speaker 1>Funcius is going to score this week. Now. We talked

1:16:55.200 --> 1:16:56.920
<v Speaker 1>about it last week, and you gotta pick your spots

1:16:56.960 --> 1:17:00.400
<v Speaker 1>with Funchius, and this might be a good one. Premature

1:17:00.439 --> 1:17:02.760
<v Speaker 1>speculation is the only thing between now and lightning round.

1:17:03.040 --> 1:17:04.320
<v Speaker 1>This is the bit where we tell you a guy

1:17:04.360 --> 1:17:05.680
<v Speaker 1>to pick up now that we think he's gonna be

1:17:05.680 --> 1:17:07.920
<v Speaker 1>a hot waiver wired next week. Brian, who you got

1:17:08.800 --> 1:17:10.719
<v Speaker 1>kind of a hail Mary, But let's go with Dante

1:17:11.000 --> 1:17:15.479
<v Speaker 1>Dante Foreman Anta the Anta foreman who is the backup

1:17:15.640 --> 1:17:19.280
<v Speaker 1>currently for Lamar Miller is still in Houston. Basically, if

1:17:19.320 --> 1:17:22.920
<v Speaker 1>a Lamar Miller injury happens, Foreman is gonna be a

1:17:22.960 --> 1:17:26.280
<v Speaker 1>factor starting Week fourteen. He has San Francisco, Jacksonville, and

1:17:26.320 --> 1:17:29.320
<v Speaker 1>Pittsburgh goes with three plus matchups. Foreman did have double

1:17:29.360 --> 1:17:31.479
<v Speaker 1>digit carries in his last two full games, and Miller

1:17:31.560 --> 1:17:35.040
<v Speaker 1>faded last year, so why not? All right, I got

1:17:35.120 --> 1:17:37.559
<v Speaker 1>this guy that you may have drafted first overall named

1:17:37.640 --> 1:17:40.439
<v Speaker 1>David Johnson. The cast came off his wrist on Monday.

1:17:40.840 --> 1:17:43.880
<v Speaker 1>Online doctors are saying recovery from this injury is tricky

1:17:44.000 --> 1:17:46.360
<v Speaker 1>due to all the small bones and ligaments in the wrist,

1:17:46.520 --> 1:17:50.120
<v Speaker 1>but Johnson said he wants to play, even if they're

1:17:50.160 --> 1:17:52.640
<v Speaker 1>out of playoff contention. He wants to get in and

1:17:52.720 --> 1:17:55.720
<v Speaker 1>get reps. And it was a hand injury, not a

1:17:55.920 --> 1:17:58.400
<v Speaker 1>leg injury, so he should be fresh when he comes back.

1:17:58.439 --> 1:18:00.200
<v Speaker 1>He should be able to hit the ground running. I'm

1:18:00.240 --> 1:18:02.880
<v Speaker 1>giving you two guys that came that got injured and

1:18:02.920 --> 1:18:04.920
<v Speaker 1>placed and I are early in the season, are now

1:18:05.000 --> 1:18:08.880
<v Speaker 1>coming off, Greg Olsen Danny Woodhead, both guys that will

1:18:08.960 --> 1:18:14.120
<v Speaker 1>immediately go into starting roster spots and both of them available.

1:18:14.160 --> 1:18:18.320
<v Speaker 1>Woodhead comes back next week, Olsen comes back the week after.

1:18:18.960 --> 1:18:20.880
<v Speaker 1>All right, let's go to Lightning Round. You know the

1:18:20.920 --> 1:18:24.840
<v Speaker 1>bit one question between two players and that is it.

1:18:25.840 --> 1:18:29.479
<v Speaker 1>We're very strict about that around here, Steve. Welcome to

1:18:29.520 --> 1:18:35.160
<v Speaker 1>the show. Thank you for your patience. Steve. Hello, Hi,

1:18:35.360 --> 1:18:41.719
<v Speaker 1>what have you got? Hello? This is Lightning Round? Yes? Oh, question,

1:18:42.120 --> 1:18:46.000
<v Speaker 1>that's fine too for it. Um, my friend offered Kareem

1:18:46.080 --> 1:18:51.519
<v Speaker 1>hunt for Hunt for Hide. Hunt is not scored in

1:18:52.160 --> 1:18:56.120
<v Speaker 1>six weeks now. Hi, Hide's kind of a sneaky play.

1:18:56.200 --> 1:18:58.519
<v Speaker 1>He's been doing really well at as of the last

1:18:58.560 --> 1:19:02.680
<v Speaker 1>three weeks and it pains me to do it, but

1:19:02.760 --> 1:19:05.519
<v Speaker 1>I think I like Hide better. All right, thank you,

1:19:05.600 --> 1:19:14.880
<v Speaker 1>Steve e. Hello, Hey, alright, Schuster. Oh, let's go with

1:19:15.080 --> 1:19:17.080
<v Speaker 1>Juju in this one. I think I would do in

1:19:17.160 --> 1:19:19.880
<v Speaker 1>the matchup. It's gonna be a good dreams Jujuc. They

1:19:19.920 --> 1:19:24.160
<v Speaker 1>had a turtle in the gang for me. Mike. Hello, Hey, guys,

1:19:24.680 --> 1:19:29.040
<v Speaker 1>just a quick questioner and pr I'm sorry Copper who

1:19:29.160 --> 1:19:32.120
<v Speaker 1>I'm here? Abdullah, Abdullah, we'll take up We're you know,

1:19:32.160 --> 1:19:34.840
<v Speaker 1>I think we're all pretty down at Abdullah. Yeah, Ben

1:19:35.280 --> 1:19:40.640
<v Speaker 1>your next. Hey, guys, four point ppr lea. Um. I

1:19:40.760 --> 1:19:42.880
<v Speaker 1>want to know if you guys would and I have

1:19:43.040 --> 1:19:48.280
<v Speaker 1>Alfred Morris would you release Zeke Elliott or would him

1:19:48.600 --> 1:19:53.680
<v Speaker 1>knowing that what's coming back for just the other handcuffs

1:19:54.280 --> 1:19:57.559
<v Speaker 1>on the cowboy. I'm not as high on Woodhead as

1:19:57.920 --> 1:20:02.000
<v Speaker 1>as Churches, so I think I'd drop Woodhead and go

1:20:02.200 --> 1:20:05.200
<v Speaker 1>Rod Smith, who's going to be playing the Woodhead role

1:20:05.920 --> 1:20:09.760
<v Speaker 1>on a better offense. Ken, I'm sorry I accidentally dropped you.

1:20:09.960 --> 1:20:12.880
<v Speaker 1>I apologize for that. Please call back Mike. Hello, you're next?

1:20:13.920 --> 1:20:21.479
<v Speaker 1>You guys? Uh Goodwin or a hump oh to two

1:20:21.520 --> 1:20:24.639
<v Speaker 1>guys I gave. I gave c grades to today. Humphries

1:20:24.680 --> 1:20:28.040
<v Speaker 1>are Goodwin non PPR. I would go Humphries and PPR.

1:20:28.120 --> 1:20:30.360
<v Speaker 1>I'm going Goodwin with the big play potential in the

1:20:30.640 --> 1:20:35.360
<v Speaker 1>standards of Goodwin. Arthur, you are next, Yeah, half point

1:20:35.439 --> 1:20:42.240
<v Speaker 1>PPR lex position Latavius Murray or jud Smith. Latavius Murray

1:20:42.320 --> 1:20:45.840
<v Speaker 1>is not He's not even rosterable, So let's let's move on.

1:20:46.080 --> 1:20:51.240
<v Speaker 1>Not even rosterable. Wow, our guy Jrrek McKinnon's the guy.

1:20:51.320 --> 1:20:55.040
<v Speaker 1>He is better every way. Lottavius, We're not going to

1:20:55.080 --> 1:20:58.439
<v Speaker 1>get into it. Taco, you're next. They got standards staring

1:20:58.560 --> 1:21:04.160
<v Speaker 1>Brady or job right. I can't put Brady on the

1:21:04.280 --> 1:21:06.800
<v Speaker 1>bench even against Denver. I've got him close, but I

1:21:06.840 --> 1:21:15.160
<v Speaker 1>got Brady ahead. Ben your next, Ben Abdullah or Alfred Morris.

1:21:16.360 --> 1:21:18.160
<v Speaker 1>All I heard was Abdula and I was gonna say

1:21:18.200 --> 1:21:21.559
<v Speaker 1>the other guy, whoever? Other guy is? All right, Corey,

1:21:21.640 --> 1:21:28.800
<v Speaker 1>you're next guy? What's going on? Humphries or Jordy Nels.

1:21:29.320 --> 1:21:31.880
<v Speaker 1>Humphrey or Jordy Nels come to this? Yeah, and I'm

1:21:31.920 --> 1:21:34.720
<v Speaker 1>starting Adam Humphries over Jordy Nels. I agree, and yeah

1:21:34.720 --> 1:21:37.160
<v Speaker 1>it has It's come to this for Jordy, who has

1:21:37.200 --> 1:21:40.200
<v Speaker 1>been virtually phased out of the Brett Hundley is a

1:21:40.280 --> 1:21:43.680
<v Speaker 1>sabotage drop that maybe maybe that'll be a preview of

1:21:43.760 --> 1:21:47.240
<v Speaker 1>next week's show. We'll find out John your next ppr

1:21:47.760 --> 1:21:52.080
<v Speaker 1>Juju or Robbie Anderson. Oh, I gotta go to chart

1:21:52.160 --> 1:21:54.160
<v Speaker 1>on this one. Do you do you like Rabbi Anderson

1:21:54.200 --> 1:21:56.760
<v Speaker 1>that much more? I love Robbie. I like Juju quite

1:21:56.760 --> 1:21:59.680
<v Speaker 1>a bit, but I'll defer I think he said it

1:21:59.720 --> 1:22:03.160
<v Speaker 1>was a pr ly too and Anderson. Juju Smith is

1:22:03.640 --> 1:22:05.960
<v Speaker 1>not a high volume guy. He's a low volume. He's

1:22:05.960 --> 1:22:08.920
<v Speaker 1>a higher upside guy that I think that I don't

1:22:08.920 --> 1:22:12.000
<v Speaker 1>even know about that. So all the advantages are to

1:22:12.120 --> 1:22:16.840
<v Speaker 1>Robby Anderson. I think so, Mikey, you're next, Marlene dark One.

1:22:19.240 --> 1:22:22.000
<v Speaker 1>You gotta go dark one against the Niners. We talked

1:22:22.040 --> 1:22:25.320
<v Speaker 1>about all the Vikings just shutting down running backs through

1:22:25.360 --> 1:22:33.240
<v Speaker 1>the air this year. David your next, David? I hello, Yes,

1:22:33.400 --> 1:22:40.840
<v Speaker 1>Alfred Morris or Doug Martin. I'm gonna take Doug more.

1:22:40.920 --> 1:22:42.880
<v Speaker 1>I think they both got B grades from US. I'm

1:22:42.880 --> 1:22:44.880
<v Speaker 1>gonna take Doug Martin because it'll get all the work.

1:22:44.920 --> 1:22:47.000
<v Speaker 1>I don't have to sweat a much of a time

1:22:47.040 --> 1:22:49.200
<v Speaker 1>share there. I know Peyton Barber got a bunch of

1:22:49.240 --> 1:22:51.320
<v Speaker 1>work last week, but that was in a blowout loss,

1:22:51.439 --> 1:22:53.640
<v Speaker 1>and I don't think that's indicative. Ron Smith's gonna have

1:22:53.680 --> 1:22:55.920
<v Speaker 1>a better game than Alfred Morris. Yeah, I'm put I

1:22:55.960 --> 1:22:59.320
<v Speaker 1>put Alfred Morris on the bench. Okay, I like Morris

1:22:59.360 --> 1:23:02.120
<v Speaker 1>more than two has done it. Dave, you're a final

1:23:02.160 --> 1:23:07.519
<v Speaker 1>caller today. Hey, I love the show. Or Shepherd in

1:23:07.560 --> 1:23:13.320
<v Speaker 1>a standard league? Uh, Sterling Shepherd's got terrific upside. I

1:23:13.479 --> 1:23:17.800
<v Speaker 1>like I got Parker with the B grade. So matchup, Carolina, Yeah,

1:23:17.840 --> 1:23:21.160
<v Speaker 1>it's a much tougher matchup. Let's take Sterling Shepherd nine

1:23:21.240 --> 1:23:25.519
<v Speaker 1>targets last week and his first game back nine times.

1:23:26.479 --> 1:23:28.000
<v Speaker 1>H If you missed any part of the show, please

1:23:28.040 --> 1:23:31.599
<v Speaker 1>check out the podcast and people listening right now. Most

1:23:31.680 --> 1:23:33.720
<v Speaker 1>of you missed every part of the show because we

1:23:33.760 --> 1:23:36.960
<v Speaker 1>started seven o'clock, so we hid Tony. When's the podcast

1:23:37.040 --> 1:23:38.960
<v Speaker 1>going out? Soon as we're done. As soon as we're done,

1:23:39.080 --> 1:23:42.519
<v Speaker 1>so the podcast will be available promptly. Best of luck

1:23:42.560 --> 1:23:44.960
<v Speaker 1>for this week, and again, speaking of the podcast, always

1:23:45.000 --> 1:23:48.439
<v Speaker 1>grateful for people who take the time to leave reviews

1:23:48.520 --> 1:23:51.679
<v Speaker 1>and ratings. Many thanks for a decade long sponsored Grainbell

1:23:51.720 --> 1:23:54.639
<v Speaker 1>Premium and our week nine winner, Ben Letty, will see

1:23:54.720 --> 1:23:57.479
<v Speaker 1>you at the man He's winners Bank, but go for

1:23:57.560 --> 1:24:01.080
<v Speaker 1>pregame coming up next. Barrera back with you for Jack

1:24:01.160 --> 1:24:04.160
<v Speaker 1>Dennon and the gang at Metropolitan Ford. And given this

1:24:04.280 --> 1:24:07.559
<v Speaker 1>is November, you're gonna hear about some fancy Black Friday

1:24:07.640 --> 1:24:10.639
<v Speaker 1>deals early and often. Jack Dennon, meanwhile, we'll cut through

1:24:10.680 --> 1:24:12.960
<v Speaker 1>the bowl with this. He needs to move his two

1:24:13.000 --> 1:24:15.639
<v Speaker 1>thousand seventeens to make room for the two thousand eighteens,

1:24:15.800 --> 1:24:18.360
<v Speaker 1>which is why this is the absolute best time to

1:24:18.439 --> 1:24:21.240
<v Speaker 1>buy a new vehicle. That's pretty straightforward, no and all

1:24:21.360 --> 1:24:24.639
<v Speaker 1>good for you. It's precisely why they are offering zero

1:24:24.800 --> 1:24:27.960
<v Speaker 1>percent for seventy two months on most in stock two

1:24:28.040 --> 1:24:31.559
<v Speaker 1>thousand seventeen models. Metropolitan Ford has over five hundred new

1:24:31.680 --> 1:24:35.400
<v Speaker 1>vehicles and nearly two hundred used vehicles available. Always the

1:24:35.439 --> 1:24:38.519
<v Speaker 1>best selection, best price, and the best financing. They want

1:24:38.600 --> 1:24:41.120
<v Speaker 1>your vehicle and they'll pay top dollar, which is why

1:24:41.200 --> 1:24:44.439
<v Speaker 1>they purchase more customer vehicles than anyone in town. And

1:24:44.479 --> 1:24:46.759
<v Speaker 1>don't forget about their state of the art quick lane service.

1:24:46.920 --> 1:24:49.439
<v Speaker 1>The thirty minute oil change is simple and fast, all

1:24:49.520 --> 1:24:52.679
<v Speaker 1>makes and models, no appointment needed. Check out Metropolitan Ford

1:24:52.720 --> 1:24:55.320
<v Speaker 1>dot com or better yet, go see Jack for nine

1:24:55.640 --> 1:24:59.040
<v Speaker 1>and Highway five at Eden Prairie. Metropolitan Ford selling customer

1:24:59.120 --> 1:25:01.479
<v Speaker 1>satisfaction and fun, not just cars,