WEBVTT - How to Work with Someone You Hate

0:00:00.400 --> 0:00:02.320
<v Speaker 1>When it comes to work, there's plenty of things to

0:00:02.320 --> 0:00:07.520
<v Speaker 1>annoy us, the open office plan, long commutes, too many emails.

0:00:07.520 --> 0:00:10.039
<v Speaker 1>But for a lot of people, the most annoying part

0:00:10.080 --> 0:00:13.800
<v Speaker 1>of the workplace is other people. But we all have

0:00:13.840 --> 0:00:16.120
<v Speaker 1>to get along. So how do you deal with people

0:00:16.160 --> 0:00:30.960
<v Speaker 1>you hate at work? This is game plan. Hi. I'm

0:00:30.960 --> 0:00:34.440
<v Speaker 1>francesco Leavie and I'm Rebecca Greenfield. And this week we

0:00:34.479 --> 0:00:37.400
<v Speaker 1>are going to talk about everyone we hate at the office.

0:00:37.800 --> 0:00:40.320
<v Speaker 1>Just kidding, we're not, but we are. We are going

0:00:40.360 --> 0:00:43.480
<v Speaker 1>to talk about some of the types of people that

0:00:44.080 --> 0:00:47.879
<v Speaker 1>it's easy to become enemies with at work. Um. And

0:00:47.960 --> 0:00:52.120
<v Speaker 1>before we get into it, I have a disclaimer. We

0:00:52.680 --> 0:00:56.720
<v Speaker 1>uh interview a guest this week whose book title has

0:00:56.760 --> 0:00:59.160
<v Speaker 1>a profane word in it, and we can't really talk

0:00:59.160 --> 0:01:01.240
<v Speaker 1>about the book without using the words, so we're going

0:01:01.280 --> 0:01:03.639
<v Speaker 1>to use it a lot. So maybe this isn't want

0:01:03.680 --> 0:01:06.080
<v Speaker 1>to listen to with kids. Let's start with why we

0:01:06.200 --> 0:01:09.120
<v Speaker 1>end up hating people at work. I think work as

0:01:09.160 --> 0:01:13.360
<v Speaker 1>a microcosm for society as a whole. You know, you

0:01:13.400 --> 0:01:16.560
<v Speaker 1>have a group of people thrown together and we all

0:01:16.640 --> 0:01:20.520
<v Speaker 1>have to exist together, and inevitably their only conflict. Yeah,

0:01:20.560 --> 0:01:22.560
<v Speaker 1>and I think though in other parts of your life

0:01:22.560 --> 0:01:25.120
<v Speaker 1>you do have a little bit more choice in who

0:01:25.240 --> 0:01:27.880
<v Speaker 1>you're in that society with. So, like I mean, I

0:01:27.920 --> 0:01:30.479
<v Speaker 1>mentioned at the very top the open office, but that's

0:01:30.520 --> 0:01:33.520
<v Speaker 1>like a little powder keg in its own way, because

0:01:33.560 --> 0:01:36.960
<v Speaker 1>everybody's sort of really in each other's face. You can

0:01:37.080 --> 0:01:39.039
<v Speaker 1>see everyone, you can hear everyone, and then it's the

0:01:39.040 --> 0:01:42.640
<v Speaker 1>people that you're around there. Ideally they're selected for how

0:01:42.680 --> 0:01:45.000
<v Speaker 1>good they are at their jobs, not necessarily how well

0:01:45.000 --> 0:01:48.960
<v Speaker 1>they get along with you. Yeah, it almost seems like

0:01:49.120 --> 0:01:54.760
<v Speaker 1>the workplace is designed for maximum annoyance with people. Yeah. Yeah,

0:01:54.800 --> 0:01:57.120
<v Speaker 1>and then you throw in, you know, some work stress.

0:01:57.240 --> 0:01:59.320
<v Speaker 1>Sometimes you have long hours, you might have to work

0:01:59.320 --> 0:02:01.480
<v Speaker 1>on a project with when and it's just like too

0:02:01.600 --> 0:02:06.000
<v Speaker 1>much contact, stressful situations and people who are all different

0:02:06.000 --> 0:02:08.440
<v Speaker 1>personality types and might not get along, or you're competing

0:02:08.480 --> 0:02:12.959
<v Speaker 1>interests and agendas that might contradict someone else's. Yeah, that

0:02:13.000 --> 0:02:16.080
<v Speaker 1>goes to your like microcosm of society theory. It's like

0:02:16.120 --> 0:02:19.359
<v Speaker 1>a little feudal land where everyone's trying to advance their

0:02:19.360 --> 0:02:22.360
<v Speaker 1>own kingdom. That reminds me of like the Leviathan or

0:02:22.400 --> 0:02:26.480
<v Speaker 1>something I was going to say, a Game of Thrones,

0:02:26.520 --> 0:02:30.600
<v Speaker 1>but yeah, no, no, no, literary I like it. So

0:02:30.639 --> 0:02:33.480
<v Speaker 1>you develop coping strategies for dealing with people you don't like,

0:02:33.760 --> 0:02:35.919
<v Speaker 1>or you should. I mean, I don't know how good

0:02:35.960 --> 0:02:37.960
<v Speaker 1>I am at it, but one thing I tend to

0:02:38.000 --> 0:02:42.760
<v Speaker 1>do is vent. Do you find venting helpful? I am

0:02:42.760 --> 0:02:46.200
<v Speaker 1>a master ventor? Yeah? I mean do you vent to

0:02:46.280 --> 0:02:49.160
<v Speaker 1>people in your personal life or just like other people

0:02:49.200 --> 0:02:51.920
<v Speaker 1>at work about the people that you both don't like?

0:02:52.160 --> 0:02:55.240
<v Speaker 1>Or it's hard because to vent to people at work,

0:02:55.280 --> 0:02:58.640
<v Speaker 1>you have to know where their allegiances are. You know,

0:02:58.680 --> 0:03:01.160
<v Speaker 1>you have to feel out if it's okay to gossip

0:03:01.200 --> 0:03:04.799
<v Speaker 1>with them about the person near you who you think

0:03:04.919 --> 0:03:07.960
<v Speaker 1>is evil. But once you what, Once you do do

0:03:08.000 --> 0:03:10.839
<v Speaker 1>that and you've like caught their you know, I roll

0:03:10.880 --> 0:03:12.680
<v Speaker 1>at the meeting and you feel like it's kind of

0:03:12.680 --> 0:03:15.240
<v Speaker 1>safe to talk to them. I feel like often for

0:03:15.280 --> 0:03:18.280
<v Speaker 1>me venting at work, it starts out good because it's like, oh,

0:03:18.320 --> 0:03:20.839
<v Speaker 1>finally I found somebody who agrees with me that this

0:03:20.880 --> 0:03:24.639
<v Speaker 1>person is really annoying in meetings. But then you can

0:03:24.760 --> 0:03:27.079
<v Speaker 1>go so far with it that it becomes like that

0:03:27.120 --> 0:03:29.840
<v Speaker 1>becomes your whole relationship with that person that all you

0:03:29.880 --> 0:03:32.280
<v Speaker 1>ever do is complain about people and then suddenly there's

0:03:32.280 --> 0:03:35.960
<v Speaker 1>like a negative tinge to it. Yes. Um. And of

0:03:36.000 --> 0:03:39.960
<v Speaker 1>course there's research on gossiping at work and it's kind

0:03:39.960 --> 0:03:42.960
<v Speaker 1>of mixed. Um. Some of it has found that gossiping

0:03:43.000 --> 0:03:45.120
<v Speaker 1>can be good for the workplace, which makes me feel

0:03:45.120 --> 0:03:48.000
<v Speaker 1>a lot better because like I'm really you know, participating

0:03:48.040 --> 0:03:50.320
<v Speaker 1>in work and making it a better place. But one

0:03:50.360 --> 0:03:53.160
<v Speaker 1>of those studies looked at how gossiping can be good

0:03:53.320 --> 0:03:56.480
<v Speaker 1>if it's a way to increase information flow in an

0:03:56.560 --> 0:03:59.960
<v Speaker 1>organization where there isn't very much so like your manager

0:04:00.160 --> 0:04:03.880
<v Speaker 1>isn't doing a good job communicating things to you. If

0:04:03.960 --> 0:04:06.520
<v Speaker 1>the underlings gossip about it, it can make it a

0:04:06.560 --> 0:04:10.640
<v Speaker 1>better workplace. Oh that sounds sort of sad. Yeah, it's

0:04:10.680 --> 0:04:13.640
<v Speaker 1>like it's good in bad workplaces. The places where the

0:04:13.680 --> 0:04:17.760
<v Speaker 1>gossip is bad is where employees are so cynical about

0:04:17.760 --> 0:04:21.279
<v Speaker 1>work that all they do is gossip and it can

0:04:21.320 --> 0:04:24.440
<v Speaker 1>harm their productivity, which I also feel. Yeah, I feel

0:04:24.440 --> 0:04:27.279
<v Speaker 1>like the first kind of gossiping, where it's like information sharing,

0:04:27.360 --> 0:04:29.440
<v Speaker 1>can can maybe lead to the second kind, like the

0:04:29.520 --> 0:04:33.039
<v Speaker 1>good kind can become of that kind. So gossiping is

0:04:33.080 --> 0:04:36.520
<v Speaker 1>not a catch all solution. Um. And also you probably

0:04:36.520 --> 0:04:40.599
<v Speaker 1>need different strategies for dealing with different types of enemies

0:04:40.640 --> 0:04:42.839
<v Speaker 1>at work. The worst person to not get along with

0:04:42.839 --> 0:04:45.480
<v Speaker 1>at work, I think is your boss, So you can

0:04:45.520 --> 0:04:48.080
<v Speaker 1>be a bad boss in a few ways. I find

0:04:48.360 --> 0:04:52.280
<v Speaker 1>it's really hard to deal with absentee managers. Like this

0:04:52.360 --> 0:04:54.080
<v Speaker 1>is something that sounds like it should be kind of

0:04:54.200 --> 0:04:56.599
<v Speaker 1>nice because it's like, oh, the cats away. You know,

0:04:56.880 --> 0:04:59.400
<v Speaker 1>your boss doesn't care what you do, but actually it

0:04:59.440 --> 0:05:01.480
<v Speaker 1>can get in the way of projects getting done. It

0:05:01.520 --> 0:05:03.440
<v Speaker 1>can end up making you look bad. And it's like

0:05:03.640 --> 0:05:05.400
<v Speaker 1>when you have a boss who supposed to be helping

0:05:05.400 --> 0:05:08.760
<v Speaker 1>you understand what your job is and how well you're doing,

0:05:08.880 --> 0:05:12.200
<v Speaker 1>and they're not there for you in that way. It

0:05:12.360 --> 0:05:16.200
<v Speaker 1>just for me, it just makes me so frustrated and

0:05:16.320 --> 0:05:20.440
<v Speaker 1>kind of depressed. Yeah, I think having an absentee boss

0:05:20.640 --> 0:05:23.560
<v Speaker 1>makes you good at being an absentee employee, which is

0:05:23.720 --> 0:05:26.320
<v Speaker 1>could be nice sometimes, like if you want to take

0:05:26.360 --> 0:05:28.479
<v Speaker 1>a long weekend and not have anyone noticed, but it

0:05:28.520 --> 0:05:31.799
<v Speaker 1>doesn't make you good at work now. And most people

0:05:31.839 --> 0:05:33.680
<v Speaker 1>I think, like want to make something of their time

0:05:33.720 --> 0:05:36.239
<v Speaker 1>when they're at work. But then there's the complete opposite

0:05:36.240 --> 0:05:40.680
<v Speaker 1>of the absentee manager, and that's the micro manager um

0:05:40.720 --> 0:05:42.920
<v Speaker 1>which I don't think anybody likes like I've never heard

0:05:42.920 --> 0:05:47.080
<v Speaker 1>anybody say, like my ideal work environment to be micro managed. Um.

0:05:47.240 --> 0:05:50.560
<v Speaker 1>But to me, when people micro manage, when people just

0:05:50.600 --> 0:05:52.880
<v Speaker 1>like get in your business about every single thing you're doing,

0:05:53.120 --> 0:05:55.400
<v Speaker 1>it's a sign they don't trust you. And they also

0:05:55.800 --> 0:05:58.120
<v Speaker 1>it's a weird attitude to go into work with that,

0:05:58.279 --> 0:06:01.680
<v Speaker 1>Like all of the people who report to you are

0:06:01.760 --> 0:06:03.920
<v Speaker 1>kind of secretly trying to get one over on you,

0:06:03.920 --> 0:06:05.960
<v Speaker 1>you know, like they want to be laid on deadlines

0:06:06.000 --> 0:06:07.919
<v Speaker 1>and they want to you know, they're not acting in

0:06:07.960 --> 0:06:10.200
<v Speaker 1>good faith and they don't have good reasons for not

0:06:10.240 --> 0:06:12.960
<v Speaker 1>getting things done on time. And I'd rather just trust

0:06:13.000 --> 0:06:15.359
<v Speaker 1>people and occasionally be like, Okay, there's a thing that

0:06:15.400 --> 0:06:17.520
<v Speaker 1>you need to get better at. I was reading about

0:06:17.520 --> 0:06:21.880
<v Speaker 1>one workplace where micro managing was to the extreme. It

0:06:21.920 --> 0:06:26.279
<v Speaker 1>made me so uncomfortable. But the boss made his employees

0:06:26.279 --> 0:06:28.040
<v Speaker 1>tell them when they were going to lunch. He got

0:06:28.040 --> 0:06:30.159
<v Speaker 1>mad at them when they stepped away from their desks

0:06:30.240 --> 0:06:35.000
<v Speaker 1>or saw that their chat light went red. Um. But

0:06:35.120 --> 0:06:38.800
<v Speaker 1>also rewarded employees for ratting each other out and give

0:06:38.839 --> 0:06:41.760
<v Speaker 1>people five dollar bonus as for calling out bad behavior.

0:06:42.160 --> 0:06:47.960
<v Speaker 1>What that's exactly the kind of like untrusting environment that micromanaging.

0:06:48.040 --> 0:06:50.520
<v Speaker 1>So's I hate that that sounds terrible. But the two

0:06:50.600 --> 0:06:53.560
<v Speaker 1>types of bosses you're talking about fall into like the

0:06:53.680 --> 0:06:57.839
<v Speaker 1>two types of bad boss categories that UM researchers have found.

0:06:57.839 --> 0:07:01.920
<v Speaker 1>So there's like the dysfunctional bad boss, which I think

0:07:02.000 --> 0:07:03.919
<v Speaker 1>is kind of the absent team manager. It's like a

0:07:03.920 --> 0:07:06.560
<v Speaker 1>bad boss who's just bad at their job. And then

0:07:06.600 --> 0:07:08.880
<v Speaker 1>there's what they call the dark bad boss, which is

0:07:08.960 --> 0:07:11.160
<v Speaker 1>kind of like the evil bad boss, which to me

0:07:11.280 --> 0:07:14.840
<v Speaker 1>is kind of what the micro manager is ye machiavellian

0:07:15.120 --> 0:07:18.640
<v Speaker 1>or someone who has bad intentions, Like I think you

0:07:18.640 --> 0:07:20.520
<v Speaker 1>can solve a lot of those problems as a manager

0:07:20.520 --> 0:07:22.440
<v Speaker 1>by just feeling like you and your team are all

0:07:22.440 --> 0:07:25.000
<v Speaker 1>sort of working towards the same goal on a team.

0:07:25.280 --> 0:07:27.760
<v Speaker 1>On a team. So let's talk about some other kinds

0:07:27.920 --> 0:07:31.360
<v Speaker 1>of enemies or people we hate at work, because it's

0:07:31.360 --> 0:07:33.480
<v Speaker 1>not just your boss's, right, the people you work with

0:07:33.800 --> 0:07:37.400
<v Speaker 1>you also end up hating. Often. I have their kind

0:07:37.480 --> 0:07:39.920
<v Speaker 1>person who just likes everybody. I guess there are those

0:07:39.960 --> 0:07:44.280
<v Speaker 1>people I have a particular dislike for this one type

0:07:44.280 --> 0:07:47.120
<v Speaker 1>of person that I am going to call the trophy collector.

0:07:47.880 --> 0:07:51.200
<v Speaker 1>This is somebody who basically only does the work that

0:07:51.320 --> 0:07:55.600
<v Speaker 1>is the most visible, so will perform being good at work.

0:07:56.000 --> 0:07:58.160
<v Speaker 1>You know, we'll send out emails about all the great

0:07:58.160 --> 0:07:59.880
<v Speaker 1>things they've done, or we'll do something if they know

0:08:00.080 --> 0:08:02.480
<v Speaker 1>it's going to get them accolades or if people in

0:08:02.840 --> 0:08:06.000
<v Speaker 1>in you know, higher up positions are going to notice it.

0:08:06.120 --> 0:08:08.800
<v Speaker 1>And those people also tend to kind of slack off

0:08:08.800 --> 0:08:11.360
<v Speaker 1>on the work that's behind the scenes, because a lot

0:08:11.400 --> 0:08:15.320
<v Speaker 1>of getting real work done is doing stuff that goes

0:08:15.400 --> 0:08:18.120
<v Speaker 1>unrewarded and also helping out your colleagues. Like you see

0:08:18.160 --> 0:08:20.280
<v Speaker 1>somebody's underwater and you're just like, hey, I can take

0:08:20.280 --> 0:08:22.520
<v Speaker 1>that over for you. You're not going to necessarily get

0:08:22.560 --> 0:08:25.160
<v Speaker 1>praised for doing that. Your colleague might even get the credit,

0:08:25.560 --> 0:08:28.080
<v Speaker 1>but over time it sort of evens out and you

0:08:28.080 --> 0:08:30.160
<v Speaker 1>you're working in good faith. But these there's a certain

0:08:30.160 --> 0:08:32.600
<v Speaker 1>type of person where it's like it makes it even

0:08:32.679 --> 0:08:35.680
<v Speaker 1>worse that they don't do that because they're getting celebrated

0:08:35.800 --> 0:08:38.080
<v Speaker 1>for all of this really high profile stuff that they

0:08:38.120 --> 0:08:40.560
<v Speaker 1>are doing. When I've worked with people like that in

0:08:40.559 --> 0:08:43.200
<v Speaker 1>the past, it has driven me crazy. It kind of

0:08:43.240 --> 0:08:46.280
<v Speaker 1>reminds me of this advice that you see a lot online,

0:08:46.440 --> 0:08:49.080
<v Speaker 1>which is like nobody's going to remember you for the

0:08:49.120 --> 0:08:52.000
<v Speaker 1>emails you sent, like they'll remember you for the things

0:08:52.000 --> 0:08:54.720
<v Speaker 1>that your name is on. And I get that advice

0:08:54.720 --> 0:08:56.480
<v Speaker 1>where it's like, you know, don't you don't need to

0:08:56.520 --> 0:08:59.040
<v Speaker 1>put all of your work into writing emails. But it's

0:08:59.080 --> 0:09:03.079
<v Speaker 1>also like sometimes work that nobody sees as part of work,

0:09:03.240 --> 0:09:06.880
<v Speaker 1>and yeah, it sucks. It's like you have to be

0:09:06.920 --> 0:09:09.000
<v Speaker 1>a particular type of person who's willing to pick up

0:09:09.040 --> 0:09:11.920
<v Speaker 1>that work. But but you know, the office doesn't move

0:09:11.920 --> 0:09:13.600
<v Speaker 1>forward unless there are people who are willing to do

0:09:13.679 --> 0:09:16.640
<v Speaker 1>that invisible work. I don't like that person. So those

0:09:16.679 --> 0:09:18.760
<v Speaker 1>are some types of people that annoy us at work.

0:09:18.800 --> 0:09:23.200
<v Speaker 1>But what about the ultimate work enemy, the asshole? Like

0:09:23.320 --> 0:09:27.640
<v Speaker 1>this is a very broad and yes profane word. Uh,

0:09:27.760 --> 0:09:29.720
<v Speaker 1>that could mean a lot of things. So we want

0:09:29.720 --> 0:09:33.079
<v Speaker 1>to break down what we're talking about when we say

0:09:33.120 --> 0:09:36.840
<v Speaker 1>someone's an asshole and figure out how you can survive

0:09:36.880 --> 0:09:43.120
<v Speaker 1>working with them. So we consulted an expert. Bob Sutton

0:09:43.440 --> 0:09:47.600
<v Speaker 1>is a professor of organizational behavior at Stanford. He wrote

0:09:47.679 --> 0:09:51.600
<v Speaker 1>the widely acclaimed book The No Asshole Rule and just

0:09:51.800 --> 0:09:57.839
<v Speaker 1>came out with its follow up, The Asshole Survival Guide.

0:09:59.160 --> 0:10:02.680
<v Speaker 1>So let's jump right, and what is your definition of

0:10:02.720 --> 0:10:07.199
<v Speaker 1>an asshole? Oh, so, my definition of an asshole is

0:10:07.320 --> 0:10:09.800
<v Speaker 1>kind of at your ear and in your brain, not

0:10:09.880 --> 0:10:13.880
<v Speaker 1>at the other person's mouth or whatever. It's a it's

0:10:13.920 --> 0:10:18.880
<v Speaker 1>that feeling that someone has left you feeling uh demeaned,

0:10:19.040 --> 0:10:24.679
<v Speaker 1>de energized, uh disrespected, oppressed. They make you feel like dirt.

0:10:25.080 --> 0:10:29.160
<v Speaker 1>That's my definition. Yeah, so that sounds like a personal

0:10:29.240 --> 0:10:33.400
<v Speaker 1>upfront is what makes some it's very personal, yes, And

0:10:33.400 --> 0:10:36.560
<v Speaker 1>and the reason that I define it that way is

0:10:36.800 --> 0:10:42.840
<v Speaker 1>there's so many different behaviors in so many different organizational cultures.

0:10:43.640 --> 0:10:47.400
<v Speaker 1>Um that, um, what's bad behavior in one might be

0:10:47.520 --> 0:10:51.040
<v Speaker 1>good behavior in the other. So just let's just take interrupting.

0:10:51.679 --> 0:10:55.360
<v Speaker 1>There's some organizational cultures where you just stop and you

0:10:55.440 --> 0:10:58.600
<v Speaker 1>let the other person talk and you don't interrupt. And

0:10:58.640 --> 0:11:01.640
<v Speaker 1>then there's ones that are sort of crazy businesses type

0:11:01.760 --> 0:11:03.520
<v Speaker 1>where if you're not interrupting, you don't get in your

0:11:03.520 --> 0:11:07.959
<v Speaker 1>word edgewise. And so whether or not you're feeling hurt

0:11:08.280 --> 0:11:11.520
<v Speaker 1>is a big part of it. We could list behaviors

0:11:11.520 --> 0:11:14.920
<v Speaker 1>that are asshole behaviors. We could talk about there's different

0:11:15.040 --> 0:11:18.000
<v Speaker 1>kind of things that tend to set people off, but

0:11:18.360 --> 0:11:21.000
<v Speaker 1>but to me, owning your feelings is a big part

0:11:21.040 --> 0:11:23.080
<v Speaker 1>of it. It's a little bit in the eye of

0:11:23.120 --> 0:11:26.560
<v Speaker 1>the beholder. Um. You mentioned in your book that that

0:11:26.679 --> 0:11:31.520
<v Speaker 1>there's kind of a assholes finished first mythology. Where do

0:11:31.559 --> 0:11:34.400
<v Speaker 1>you think that came from? And and is there any

0:11:34.400 --> 0:11:38.280
<v Speaker 1>truth to it? Yes, there is, Um. I would start

0:11:38.320 --> 0:11:41.000
<v Speaker 1>with the headline that if you're an asshole and a winner,

0:11:41.160 --> 0:11:43.440
<v Speaker 1>you're still a loser in my book, because you're doing

0:11:43.480 --> 0:11:46.720
<v Speaker 1>so much damage to other people. The there's a very

0:11:46.760 --> 0:11:49.679
<v Speaker 1>specific kind of situation where people finish first if they

0:11:49.880 --> 0:11:52.719
<v Speaker 1>leave others feeling to mean, to deenergize when it's a

0:11:52.800 --> 0:11:56.760
<v Speaker 1>zero sum game, and and the way we play the

0:11:56.800 --> 0:11:59.840
<v Speaker 1>game is by just stomping on others. So to use

0:11:59.880 --> 0:12:03.320
<v Speaker 1>a examples of cultures, uh, the old Merrill Lynch culture,

0:12:03.440 --> 0:12:07.080
<v Speaker 1>the old Microsoft culture. That's how the game was played there.

0:12:08.040 --> 0:12:11.800
<v Speaker 1>But the problem is that's the way that individuals get ahead.

0:12:12.200 --> 0:12:15.360
<v Speaker 1>And all the evidence is that if you stomp on

0:12:15.440 --> 0:12:18.040
<v Speaker 1>others on the way to the top, you undermine the

0:12:18.120 --> 0:12:22.679
<v Speaker 1>performance of the people around you and your overall organization.

0:12:23.600 --> 0:12:27.080
<v Speaker 1>So sometimes winners do finish first, but they end up

0:12:27.120 --> 0:12:31.320
<v Speaker 1>running loser organizations and creating losers around them. You mentioned

0:12:31.320 --> 0:12:34.560
<v Speaker 1>that some things might make one person feel demeaned or

0:12:34.559 --> 0:12:38.680
<v Speaker 1>insulted or in another company just be the company culture

0:12:38.760 --> 0:12:40.360
<v Speaker 1>or the way people talk to each other. And it's fine.

0:12:40.800 --> 0:12:43.600
<v Speaker 1>So how do you, as an individual determine how bad

0:12:43.640 --> 0:12:45.960
<v Speaker 1>the problem is if you think you have a that's really,

0:12:46.600 --> 0:12:50.720
<v Speaker 1>um an interesting question. And by nature this is human psychology.

0:12:50.720 --> 0:12:54.320
<v Speaker 1>There's subjectivity to it. And uh, to me, there's the

0:12:54.360 --> 0:12:57.319
<v Speaker 1>cultural part and then there's the part that you sort

0:12:57.320 --> 0:12:59.840
<v Speaker 1>of own. The cultural part we've already talked about is

0:12:59.840 --> 0:13:02.440
<v Speaker 1>that an insult in one culture is just everyday life

0:13:02.480 --> 0:13:05.000
<v Speaker 1>and the other and the other part is that some

0:13:05.160 --> 0:13:10.600
<v Speaker 1>of us are more thin skinned than others. The fact is, Uh,

0:13:10.920 --> 0:13:12.640
<v Speaker 1>my wife used to be managing partner of a large

0:13:12.679 --> 0:13:15.160
<v Speaker 1>law firm, and her advice is, uh, if you're going

0:13:15.200 --> 0:13:17.400
<v Speaker 1>to survive in a large law firm, you better have

0:13:17.440 --> 0:13:20.120
<v Speaker 1>a pretty thick skin because you're just not gonna make

0:13:20.160 --> 0:13:22.199
<v Speaker 1>it because people are gonna insult you, they're gonna ignore you,

0:13:22.200 --> 0:13:23.880
<v Speaker 1>your clients are gonna yell you. This is what it's

0:13:23.920 --> 0:13:26.319
<v Speaker 1>like being a large lawyer in a large law firm.

0:13:26.360 --> 0:13:27.920
<v Speaker 1>But I don't know if you were going to work

0:13:27.920 --> 0:13:32.240
<v Speaker 1>in a yoga studio. Such behavior might not be quite

0:13:32.360 --> 0:13:35.240
<v Speaker 1>as as I think that's why lawyers open yoga studios.

0:13:35.240 --> 0:13:39.120
<v Speaker 1>But that's another that's another side story. Um So, so

0:13:39.160 --> 0:13:42.839
<v Speaker 1>there's that part. And for me, the main way in

0:13:42.960 --> 0:13:45.360
<v Speaker 1>a lot of the problem when you have asshole problems

0:13:46.040 --> 0:13:48.679
<v Speaker 1>is to have people in your life who essentially can

0:13:48.679 --> 0:13:51.080
<v Speaker 1>tell you whether you're crazy or not in a lot

0:13:51.120 --> 0:13:53.800
<v Speaker 1>of ways, whether or not you have an asshole problem

0:13:53.840 --> 0:13:55.800
<v Speaker 1>and should do something about it. A lot of it

0:13:55.840 --> 0:13:59.120
<v Speaker 1>is having friends co workers around you who can help

0:13:59.160 --> 0:14:01.240
<v Speaker 1>you assess your souation. You should run it by your

0:14:01.360 --> 0:14:04.680
<v Speaker 1>your inner circle and make sure that you're you're checking

0:14:04.720 --> 0:14:08.000
<v Speaker 1>whether your feelings are accurate. Yeah, and and also it's

0:14:08.040 --> 0:14:11.560
<v Speaker 1>this notion that, um sometimes there's a problem where somebody

0:14:11.600 --> 0:14:13.080
<v Speaker 1>is treating you like dirt and they just hate you

0:14:13.920 --> 0:14:16.880
<v Speaker 1>and they're nice to everybody else, and I would call

0:14:16.960 --> 0:14:20.160
<v Speaker 1>that you've kind of got an interpersonal conflict problem. Or

0:14:20.520 --> 0:14:22.880
<v Speaker 1>one of the biggest problems is you've got an equal

0:14:22.880 --> 0:14:26.280
<v Speaker 1>opportunity asshole, or somebody who just doesn't like women, or

0:14:26.400 --> 0:14:30.080
<v Speaker 1>just doesn't like people who aren't white or something, And

0:14:30.120 --> 0:14:33.160
<v Speaker 1>then you've got a different sort of problem than if

0:14:33.200 --> 0:14:35.640
<v Speaker 1>it's just somebody who is out to get you, which

0:14:35.720 --> 0:14:39.760
<v Speaker 1>happens sometimes in life. You mentioned earlier though that there

0:14:39.800 --> 0:14:43.800
<v Speaker 1>are generic asshole behaviors. Can you get into some of

0:14:43.800 --> 0:14:46.880
<v Speaker 1>those things? I would break it into three categories. The

0:14:46.960 --> 0:14:51.120
<v Speaker 1>first category is open, kind of in your face, treating

0:14:51.160 --> 0:14:53.840
<v Speaker 1>you like dirt, so the flick cigarette or or calling

0:14:53.880 --> 0:14:57.800
<v Speaker 1>you an obscenity would do. The second backstabbing in the

0:14:57.800 --> 0:15:00.960
<v Speaker 1>book is a local Silicon Valley see Oh interviewed, and

0:15:01.000 --> 0:15:04.600
<v Speaker 1>he described how he had a grip. So what would

0:15:04.600 --> 0:15:07.400
<v Speaker 1>be is this guy, yes, boss, I'll do whatever you want.

0:15:07.440 --> 0:15:10.440
<v Speaker 1>That's a great idea, and then he would bad mouth

0:15:10.480 --> 0:15:12.840
<v Speaker 1>the boss and screw up the implementation of it and

0:15:12.840 --> 0:15:16.000
<v Speaker 1>then go blame somebody else. So so that's that kind

0:15:16.000 --> 0:15:18.160
<v Speaker 1>of asshole and and that requires a different kind of

0:15:18.200 --> 0:15:21.440
<v Speaker 1>situation because you kind of got to do recognizance um.

0:15:21.640 --> 0:15:24.800
<v Speaker 1>And then the third kind are people who treat you

0:15:24.840 --> 0:15:28.040
<v Speaker 1>as if you're a completely irrelevant object. Is if you're

0:15:28.080 --> 0:15:31.240
<v Speaker 1>part of the furniture. And and if you have a

0:15:31.280 --> 0:15:33.400
<v Speaker 1>boss or a co worker who just treat you like

0:15:33.440 --> 0:15:37.480
<v Speaker 1>you're invisible, that's actually really painful that you don't matter

0:15:37.520 --> 0:15:40.840
<v Speaker 1>at all. One of the solutions that you suggest in

0:15:40.840 --> 0:15:44.440
<v Speaker 1>your book is just to quit. And I wonder why.

0:15:44.560 --> 0:15:46.880
<v Speaker 1>I mean, it's not always possible to quit, but what

0:15:47.040 --> 0:15:50.040
<v Speaker 1>it is. Why does that solution not not seem available

0:15:50.080 --> 0:15:52.400
<v Speaker 1>to people? First of all, there's there are some people

0:15:52.400 --> 0:15:55.680
<v Speaker 1>who really can't quit. So one of the examples have

0:15:55.760 --> 0:15:57.880
<v Speaker 1>in the book is a woman who is clerking for

0:15:57.920 --> 0:15:59.760
<v Speaker 1>a federal judge and was one year into a two

0:15:59.840 --> 0:16:02.080
<v Speaker 1>year clerkship and she looked at her option that just

0:16:02.240 --> 0:16:05.280
<v Speaker 1>wasn't gonna work. But then there's the kind of people

0:16:05.440 --> 0:16:10.960
<v Speaker 1>who have are in denial. Next year, it'll get better. Um,

0:16:11.080 --> 0:16:13.760
<v Speaker 1>she's promised me she's gonna stop do it doing it

0:16:13.840 --> 0:16:15.760
<v Speaker 1>even though your boss has promised to you that she's

0:16:15.760 --> 0:16:17.960
<v Speaker 1>gonna stop screaming at you twenty five times? So why

0:16:18.000 --> 0:16:21.040
<v Speaker 1>would they stop the twenty six times? My favorite one?

0:16:21.160 --> 0:16:23.760
<v Speaker 1>And I'm one of mine. I just have to finish

0:16:23.760 --> 0:16:27.920
<v Speaker 1>this one project, and there's always another project. But Um,

0:16:28.320 --> 0:16:31.440
<v Speaker 1>the fact is that although I'm very careful to give

0:16:31.480 --> 0:16:33.600
<v Speaker 1>people the advice, my main advice about quitting is don't

0:16:33.600 --> 0:16:36.160
<v Speaker 1>be stupid, don't burn your bridges, and don't quit if

0:16:36.200 --> 0:16:40.040
<v Speaker 1>you can't feed your children or something like that. Um.

0:16:40.120 --> 0:16:42.320
<v Speaker 1>But um, the way I think about it is. It's

0:16:42.360 --> 0:16:45.280
<v Speaker 1>sort of like people say quitters should be punished, but

0:16:45.560 --> 0:16:48.000
<v Speaker 1>if somebody's hitting you with a hammer, maybe you should

0:16:48.000 --> 0:16:49.720
<v Speaker 1>walk away from it and not walk back into that

0:16:49.760 --> 0:16:51.720
<v Speaker 1>room where you're being hit with a hammer. So there's

0:16:51.760 --> 0:16:53.920
<v Speaker 1>a point where it might be time to quit. But

0:16:54.080 --> 0:16:56.040
<v Speaker 1>my motto is, don't be stupid about it. Try to

0:16:56.040 --> 0:16:57.760
<v Speaker 1>figure out what your options are, and don't burn your

0:16:57.800 --> 0:17:00.960
<v Speaker 1>bridges and less than necessary. I there are other coping

0:17:01.000 --> 0:17:04.160
<v Speaker 1>mechanisms that you said. Just before getting to the point

0:17:04.160 --> 0:17:07.320
<v Speaker 1>of quitting. There's lots of things you can do. So

0:17:07.560 --> 0:17:10.119
<v Speaker 1>there's one set of strategies that I call a distancing

0:17:10.200 --> 0:17:13.280
<v Speaker 1>or avoidance strategy. So to me, it's kind of like

0:17:13.720 --> 0:17:16.919
<v Speaker 1>the asshole ism is kryptonite and your goal is to

0:17:17.080 --> 0:17:21.840
<v Speaker 1>avoid as much exposure to it as possible. So leaving

0:17:21.920 --> 0:17:25.720
<v Speaker 1>meetings early would be an example. Uh. I don't buy

0:17:25.720 --> 0:17:28.640
<v Speaker 1>into the general notion that Steve Jobs was always an asshole. Nonetheless,

0:17:28.680 --> 0:17:30.840
<v Speaker 1>somebody told me who worked for him for years, that

0:17:30.880 --> 0:17:32.960
<v Speaker 1>he always would make sure not to sit next to

0:17:33.000 --> 0:17:35.280
<v Speaker 1>Steve during meetings or to get an elevator with him.

0:17:35.440 --> 0:17:39.359
<v Speaker 1>There's also one of my favorite techniques is uh I

0:17:39.440 --> 0:17:42.800
<v Speaker 1>call it the rhythm method, but it's the notion that, um,

0:17:42.920 --> 0:17:44.600
<v Speaker 1>if you've got some in your life who wants to

0:17:44.640 --> 0:17:46.200
<v Speaker 1>meet with you a lot and send you all these

0:17:46.240 --> 0:17:49.800
<v Speaker 1>emails and they're like really nasty, uh, that what you

0:17:49.920 --> 0:17:52.960
<v Speaker 1>do is you kind of meet as rarely as possible

0:17:53.359 --> 0:17:57.000
<v Speaker 1>and wait for those six or seven emails, wait maybe

0:17:57.040 --> 0:17:58.560
<v Speaker 1>a week or two in the answer them all at once.

0:17:59.480 --> 0:18:01.400
<v Speaker 1>And that as a couple of things when it reduces

0:18:01.400 --> 0:18:04.440
<v Speaker 1>your exposure. The other thing is, and we haven't talked

0:18:04.560 --> 0:18:06.760
<v Speaker 1>much about different sort of assholes, but there's a certain

0:18:06.840 --> 0:18:10.159
<v Speaker 1>type of assholes probably once of Mackabellian personality. If you

0:18:10.200 --> 0:18:14.000
<v Speaker 1>look at the research who they're not clueless. The reason

0:18:14.040 --> 0:18:16.119
<v Speaker 1>they treat you like dirt is that their their brain

0:18:16.200 --> 0:18:18.880
<v Speaker 1>lights up when they see you suffer. And if you've

0:18:18.920 --> 0:18:21.680
<v Speaker 1>got that sort of asshole like giving them less reinforcement,

0:18:21.720 --> 0:18:24.560
<v Speaker 1>it's just like giving a rap fewer pellets that at

0:18:24.600 --> 0:18:29.520
<v Speaker 1>least you're slowing the reinforcement. So so there's those kinds

0:18:29.560 --> 0:18:32.879
<v Speaker 1>and then there's a whole another set of of coping

0:18:32.880 --> 0:18:36.400
<v Speaker 1>mechanisms that are based on kind of cognitive behavioral therapy,

0:18:36.480 --> 0:18:38.800
<v Speaker 1>which is you can't change your environment, but you change

0:18:38.840 --> 0:18:41.960
<v Speaker 1>the way that you perceive it. So a couple of

0:18:42.040 --> 0:18:46.080
<v Speaker 1>quick examples. One of my favorite ones, which is evidence based,

0:18:46.160 --> 0:18:50.040
<v Speaker 1>is called temporal distancing, and what that means is when

0:18:50.080 --> 0:18:52.240
<v Speaker 1>somebody is treating you like there. It could be a customer,

0:18:52.720 --> 0:18:55.959
<v Speaker 1>it could be a year into a two year internship.

0:18:56.560 --> 0:18:59.760
<v Speaker 1>You imagine that, um, it's in the future, and your

0:18:59.760 --> 0:19:01.840
<v Speaker 1>look back on it, it's not so bad. So by

0:19:01.840 --> 0:19:05.240
<v Speaker 1>shifting time focus that helps. And then the other one

0:19:05.640 --> 0:19:09.160
<v Speaker 1>is finding some way to become more emotionally detached from

0:19:09.200 --> 0:19:10.920
<v Speaker 1>it so you kind of feel like you're not there.

0:19:11.440 --> 0:19:13.320
<v Speaker 1>One of my favorite stories one of my friends, her

0:19:13.359 --> 0:19:17.439
<v Speaker 1>name's Becky Margiotta, UM, and so Becky when she was

0:19:17.800 --> 0:19:19.920
<v Speaker 1>a first year plead at West Point. So if you

0:19:19.960 --> 0:19:21.840
<v Speaker 1>know west Point, they're gonna yell at you and hayes

0:19:21.880 --> 0:19:25.320
<v Speaker 1>you every day. And Becky's is the eighties, and yet

0:19:25.440 --> 0:19:28.400
<v Speaker 1>every day some upper classmen would walk up to her

0:19:28.800 --> 0:19:30.639
<v Speaker 1>and asked her what was on the front page of

0:19:30.680 --> 0:19:32.200
<v Speaker 1>the New York Times that day, and if she couldn't

0:19:32.240 --> 0:19:34.119
<v Speaker 1>recite it, she'd get screamed at and told how stupid

0:19:34.119 --> 0:19:36.680
<v Speaker 1>she was. And the way that she coped with it

0:19:37.240 --> 0:19:41.280
<v Speaker 1>was by imagining that these people were clever comedians and

0:19:41.320 --> 0:19:43.840
<v Speaker 1>she just thought they were so funny. So it was

0:19:43.880 --> 0:19:46.080
<v Speaker 1>sort of like watching a movie and not taking it personally.

0:19:46.119 --> 0:19:48.920
<v Speaker 1>And I thought that was brilliant. Those strategies are fascinating.

0:19:48.960 --> 0:19:51.000
<v Speaker 1>So much about how we work is just learning how

0:19:51.000 --> 0:19:54.320
<v Speaker 1>to not take things personally. Um, you have another strategy

0:19:54.359 --> 0:19:58.560
<v Speaker 1>that you you I think we're writing about in terms

0:19:58.600 --> 0:20:02.760
<v Speaker 1>of the type of asshole who treats you, like the

0:20:02.800 --> 0:20:05.760
<v Speaker 1>furniture that you mentioned earlier, which is hiding in plain sight?

0:20:05.960 --> 0:20:09.360
<v Speaker 1>Can you explain what that is? Ah? Well, so one

0:20:09.400 --> 0:20:11.080
<v Speaker 1>way to think about it, this is actually research on

0:20:11.160 --> 0:20:14.880
<v Speaker 1>t s A agents. And one of the things that

0:20:15.000 --> 0:20:17.960
<v Speaker 1>you'll do if there's you're in an asshole intensive environment

0:20:18.000 --> 0:20:20.440
<v Speaker 1>and let's going through the security screening might be it's

0:20:20.480 --> 0:20:25.200
<v Speaker 1>a very asshole intensive environment. And sometimes in those situations,

0:20:25.320 --> 0:20:27.760
<v Speaker 1>you just don't want to be noticed, so you're sort

0:20:27.760 --> 0:20:30.080
<v Speaker 1>of the strategy is to sort of embrace if there's

0:20:30.119 --> 0:20:33.280
<v Speaker 1>a if there's a neglectful manager, say, the strategy is

0:20:33.280 --> 0:20:36.240
<v Speaker 1>sort of to embrace not being noticed because you might

0:20:36.240 --> 0:20:41.520
<v Speaker 1>be in for worse. Absolutely, um And and that's also

0:20:41.560 --> 0:20:43.640
<v Speaker 1>one of the classic things. And I don't know they've

0:20:43.680 --> 0:20:45.480
<v Speaker 1>been in a workplace like this, but I have where

0:20:45.880 --> 0:20:48.840
<v Speaker 1>part of the executive assistance job is to tell you

0:20:49.240 --> 0:20:51.280
<v Speaker 1>when the boss is coming and whether the boss is

0:20:51.280 --> 0:20:54.680
<v Speaker 1>in a bad mood or not. And under those situations,

0:20:54.760 --> 0:20:56.560
<v Speaker 1>you just want to be at your desk and not

0:20:56.640 --> 0:20:59.200
<v Speaker 1>be noticed if he or she is storming through sort

0:20:59.200 --> 0:21:02.320
<v Speaker 1>of flaming rebody. So one of those situations, we're not

0:21:02.359 --> 0:21:04.520
<v Speaker 1>being noticed when an asshole is in the mood is

0:21:04.560 --> 0:21:06.840
<v Speaker 1>a pretty good defense move. Some of the t s A.

0:21:07.400 --> 0:21:10.520
<v Speaker 1>Folks would say that they would try to dress in

0:21:10.640 --> 0:21:13.399
<v Speaker 1>unflashy ways not to become too interesting at work so

0:21:13.440 --> 0:21:15.240
<v Speaker 1>they wouldn't be noticed by their supervisor. Some of the

0:21:15.240 --> 0:21:19.360
<v Speaker 1>research brought that out. Listening to some of the strategies,

0:21:19.960 --> 0:21:22.600
<v Speaker 1>it sounds hard sometimes like you have to reframe your

0:21:22.760 --> 0:21:26.080
<v Speaker 1>entire way of looking at things. Do you have any

0:21:26.119 --> 0:21:29.639
<v Speaker 1>coping mechanisms for people who just want to, you know,

0:21:29.920 --> 0:21:32.080
<v Speaker 1>take care of themselves when they're in this situation. You

0:21:32.200 --> 0:21:35.439
<v Speaker 1>can't become resilient and strong and the perfect person who

0:21:35.600 --> 0:21:39.280
<v Speaker 1>isn't scared of an asshole. Well, I think that all

0:21:39.280 --> 0:21:43.160
<v Speaker 1>of us are reasonably scared of of assholes, and um

0:21:44.400 --> 0:21:47.960
<v Speaker 1>for me, if if you can't uh do the reframing

0:21:48.000 --> 0:21:50.320
<v Speaker 1>is very difficult. That cognitive behavioral therapy, although it works,

0:21:50.359 --> 0:21:53.240
<v Speaker 1>takes a while and having people who can support you

0:21:53.240 --> 0:21:55.800
<v Speaker 1>and it helps. But that's why I go back to

0:21:55.920 --> 0:21:59.520
<v Speaker 1>a lot of the strategies where you're simply avoiding the

0:21:59.560 --> 0:22:02.640
<v Speaker 1>amount of contact that you have with the asshole, hopefully

0:22:02.680 --> 0:22:05.359
<v Speaker 1>that will help. And then and then the other sort

0:22:05.400 --> 0:22:08.400
<v Speaker 1>of thing. And there's there's interesting research on temporary detachment.

0:22:09.000 --> 0:22:11.080
<v Speaker 1>If you can just for example, and all of us,

0:22:11.119 --> 0:22:12.720
<v Speaker 1>like we have our phones and we can't resist looking

0:22:12.720 --> 0:22:15.639
<v Speaker 1>at our phones. If you cannot look at your email

0:22:15.720 --> 0:22:19.800
<v Speaker 1>and not think about your job during the we can

0:22:19.840 --> 0:22:22.439
<v Speaker 1>detach that. There's pretty good evidence that people can separate

0:22:22.480 --> 0:22:25.240
<v Speaker 1>from work, um have better mental health than those of

0:22:25.280 --> 0:22:27.240
<v Speaker 1>us who are always on twenty four hours a day,

0:22:27.240 --> 0:22:29.199
<v Speaker 1>which is more and more difficult for all of us.

0:22:29.240 --> 0:22:32.400
<v Speaker 1>Of course, Yeah, we talked about that a lot, um,

0:22:32.480 --> 0:22:35.280
<v Speaker 1>the need to do that. I just want to wrap

0:22:35.359 --> 0:22:38.359
<v Speaker 1>up with one final question. Um, from all of this

0:22:38.440 --> 0:22:40.520
<v Speaker 1>work you've done, all the research you've reviewed on the

0:22:40.520 --> 0:22:42.520
<v Speaker 1>different types of people who can make your life miserable,

0:22:42.880 --> 0:22:45.840
<v Speaker 1>why do you think we end up working with so

0:22:45.880 --> 0:22:48.400
<v Speaker 1>many people like this? Why does so many assholes welc

0:22:48.440 --> 0:22:53.040
<v Speaker 1>among us? Uh? Well, I some of it you could

0:22:53.400 --> 0:22:55.840
<v Speaker 1>lead to personality, but I think a lot of it

0:22:55.960 --> 0:22:58.040
<v Speaker 1>is because of the nature of the workplaces we have

0:22:59.080 --> 0:23:01.840
<v Speaker 1>these days. In particul ler but in general. You think

0:23:01.840 --> 0:23:05.320
<v Speaker 1>about it. If you want to create a laboratory experiment

0:23:05.359 --> 0:23:09.040
<v Speaker 1>where you create jerks, what do you do? Uh well,

0:23:09.119 --> 0:23:12.879
<v Speaker 1>you put people under time pressure. You create differences between

0:23:12.920 --> 0:23:15.920
<v Speaker 1>the rich and the poor. For me, the analogy is

0:23:15.960 --> 0:23:17.639
<v Speaker 1>kind of getting on an airplane. You can see it

0:23:17.680 --> 0:23:20.840
<v Speaker 1>all happening. Uh well, you squeeze people close together in

0:23:20.880 --> 0:23:25.960
<v Speaker 1>that case, um and um. And then there's this contagion

0:23:26.080 --> 0:23:29.480
<v Speaker 1>problem that when when we see assholes, we catch the disease.

0:23:29.520 --> 0:23:32.640
<v Speaker 1>It spreads like a common cold. So in some ways

0:23:32.720 --> 0:23:35.879
<v Speaker 1>are Oh, and then we communicate online rather we have

0:23:35.920 --> 0:23:38.720
<v Speaker 1>eye contact. Right now, when you don't have eye contact,

0:23:38.880 --> 0:23:41.159
<v Speaker 1>there's a bunch of evidence that we have less empathy

0:23:41.200 --> 0:23:44.359
<v Speaker 1>for people, and it makes people nasty. So, um, if

0:23:44.359 --> 0:23:47.280
<v Speaker 1>you're spending all day on slack, even working with people

0:23:47.320 --> 0:23:49.560
<v Speaker 1>who are in the same space as you, and you

0:23:49.600 --> 0:23:51.000
<v Speaker 1>don't get up and look them in the eye, that

0:23:51.080 --> 0:23:55.400
<v Speaker 1>causes problems. So in some ways we are creating workplaces

0:23:55.680 --> 0:23:58.960
<v Speaker 1>that are almost perfect. Petrie disk dishes for assholes, and

0:23:58.960 --> 0:24:00.480
<v Speaker 1>you kind of got to remember or to have some

0:24:00.520 --> 0:24:03.399
<v Speaker 1>empathy and human contact and eye contact, and maybe we

0:24:03.400 --> 0:24:05.600
<v Speaker 1>could bring down the problem a little bit. You know why.

0:24:05.640 --> 0:24:07.640
<v Speaker 1>There's something kind of helpful about that we're not necessarily

0:24:07.680 --> 0:24:11.119
<v Speaker 1>all such bad people. It's just the environment with the

0:24:11.240 --> 0:24:15.160
<v Speaker 1>system game. Well, Bob, thank you so much for taking

0:24:15.160 --> 0:24:25.480
<v Speaker 1>the time to talk about this. Is it kind of

0:24:25.520 --> 0:24:31.280
<v Speaker 1>sounds like we're all assholes. We all in certain times

0:24:31.480 --> 0:24:35.639
<v Speaker 1>can exhibit asshole behavior um and that the conditions of

0:24:35.680 --> 0:24:39.159
<v Speaker 1>the workplays make that very likely, and that you're not

0:24:39.200 --> 0:24:42.880
<v Speaker 1>necessarily working with someone who is this thing, but you're

0:24:42.960 --> 0:24:45.680
<v Speaker 1>in a situation with somebody who's acting like this thing.

0:24:45.800 --> 0:24:49.080
<v Speaker 1>And I think that's helpful in dealing with these people. Yeah,

0:24:49.280 --> 0:24:53.639
<v Speaker 1>Like one person's asshole is another person's perfectly fine colleague.

0:24:53.800 --> 0:24:57.320
<v Speaker 1>And I think realizing that we are that way to

0:24:57.359 --> 0:24:59.439
<v Speaker 1>other people can maybe help us develop a little bit

0:24:59.480 --> 0:25:03.600
<v Speaker 1>of empathy for them as one coping strategy. Like they're

0:25:03.600 --> 0:25:06.200
<v Speaker 1>not a monster, they're just in a situation that's making

0:25:06.200 --> 0:25:08.240
<v Speaker 1>them act this way, or at least it makes it

0:25:08.320 --> 0:25:11.639
<v Speaker 1>more manageable to deal with this situation if it's not

0:25:11.680 --> 0:25:14.720
<v Speaker 1>this person with this personality type, but somebody who's just

0:25:14.800 --> 0:25:17.680
<v Speaker 1>acting away for a specific reason. I also thought maybe

0:25:18.359 --> 0:25:22.200
<v Speaker 1>the whole idea of leaving your job seems a little

0:25:22.200 --> 0:25:25.040
<v Speaker 1>extreme if we're going to think of assholes this way. Yeah,

0:25:25.080 --> 0:25:26.919
<v Speaker 1>I agree, now that we know how common it is,

0:25:26.960 --> 0:25:29.520
<v Speaker 1>and like how many different types of people you're almost

0:25:29.560 --> 0:25:33.120
<v Speaker 1>guaranteed not to get along with at work, leaving seems

0:25:33.160 --> 0:25:36.080
<v Speaker 1>impractical for every single job. Of course, if you're in

0:25:36.080 --> 0:25:40.439
<v Speaker 1>a toxic workplace, one of your only solutions for really

0:25:40.600 --> 0:25:43.919
<v Speaker 1>making your life better maybe to leave um and we

0:25:43.960 --> 0:25:46.119
<v Speaker 1>did a whole episode on toxic workplaces, which you can

0:25:46.200 --> 0:25:49.560
<v Speaker 1>check out if that's your situation. But short of that,

0:25:49.840 --> 0:25:52.800
<v Speaker 1>you should probably try and find some coping strategies. Yeah.

0:25:52.840 --> 0:25:55.480
<v Speaker 1>I think one of those coping strategies is understanding that

0:25:55.560 --> 0:25:58.159
<v Speaker 1>you are going to be in situations at work with

0:25:58.200 --> 0:26:00.359
<v Speaker 1>people who you don't like and sometimes you well aren't

0:26:00.359 --> 0:26:02.320
<v Speaker 1>going to be nice to each other, and you can't

0:26:02.359 --> 0:26:04.440
<v Speaker 1>control other people, so you need to learn how to

0:26:05.600 --> 0:26:08.080
<v Speaker 1>deal with those situations yourself or change the way you

0:26:08.119 --> 0:26:11.800
<v Speaker 1>see it. It's kind of like therapy for free. It's

0:26:11.800 --> 0:26:16.280
<v Speaker 1>free therapy. You're welcome, and now it's time for half

0:26:16.280 --> 0:26:22.399
<v Speaker 1>big takes, halfy fake takes. You can leave us a

0:26:22.480 --> 0:26:24.440
<v Speaker 1>voicemail and let us know what your half Bay take

0:26:24.560 --> 0:26:27.960
<v Speaker 1>is by calling two one to six seven zero one six.

0:26:28.520 --> 0:26:31.399
<v Speaker 1>This week, we had a caller follow up on my

0:26:31.560 --> 0:26:34.600
<v Speaker 1>half Bay take from last week about how men don't

0:26:34.600 --> 0:26:39.440
<v Speaker 1>know the difference between skirts and dresses. Hard Rebecca High

0:26:39.480 --> 0:26:47.240
<v Speaker 1>Francesca I was calling response to your dresses versus skirts?

0:26:47.359 --> 0:26:51.240
<v Speaker 1>Uh issue. I do think there's a male equivalent of

0:26:51.280 --> 0:26:55.080
<v Speaker 1>that confusion or problem, which is that sometimes I come

0:26:55.119 --> 0:26:58.520
<v Speaker 1>to work wearing a jacket or a blazer, and uh,

0:26:58.800 --> 0:27:03.040
<v Speaker 1>I'm told suit, which is a very nice compliment. But

0:27:03.480 --> 0:27:06.160
<v Speaker 1>sometimes I think to myself, well, I'm not I didn't

0:27:06.160 --> 0:27:09.639
<v Speaker 1>come to work wearing a suit just for a jacket. Uh.

0:27:09.760 --> 0:27:13.040
<v Speaker 1>So you know, it seems like some people men and women, Uh,

0:27:13.240 --> 0:27:16.399
<v Speaker 1>I don't wantly think about or know the difference between

0:27:16.480 --> 0:27:19.840
<v Speaker 1>a suit and a jacket. I guess, um, But it's

0:27:19.840 --> 0:27:22.000
<v Speaker 1>two thousand and seventeen, so you know you can't really

0:27:22.040 --> 0:27:25.280
<v Speaker 1>be super upset about that way. Thanks for a great podcast.

0:27:25.400 --> 0:27:26.919
<v Speaker 1>I just thought i'd call in and and relate to that.

0:27:27.480 --> 0:27:30.480
<v Speaker 1>Keep up your really great work. By this is on point.

0:27:31.240 --> 0:27:34.399
<v Speaker 1>He's totally right. This is the exact male equivalent of

0:27:34.960 --> 0:27:38.399
<v Speaker 1>skirts versus dresses. I didn't really know, so now I know,

0:27:38.480 --> 0:27:40.280
<v Speaker 1>Thank you you didn't know. I mean, I feel like

0:27:40.320 --> 0:27:42.320
<v Speaker 1>I kind of knew, but I'm sure I've I have

0:27:42.440 --> 0:27:44.879
<v Speaker 1>made that mistake, like maybe I've said suit jacket? Is

0:27:44.920 --> 0:27:47.320
<v Speaker 1>suit jacket a thing you can say? I don't know?

0:27:47.640 --> 0:27:50.920
<v Speaker 1>The fact the fact that we don't know shows that, um,

0:27:50.960 --> 0:27:53.399
<v Speaker 1>we have reached complete gender equality when it comes to

0:27:53.480 --> 0:27:58.679
<v Speaker 1>ignorance about clothing items. Um. Also, I have found a

0:27:58.680 --> 0:28:00.639
<v Speaker 1>lot of men who do know the difference between skirts

0:28:00.640 --> 0:28:03.240
<v Speaker 1>and dresses over the past week. So I'm I'm sticking

0:28:03.240 --> 0:28:05.040
<v Speaker 1>with my happy take. I still think it's a problem,

0:28:05.080 --> 0:28:08.320
<v Speaker 1>but it's a problem for men and for women. Becca,

0:28:08.920 --> 0:28:11.560
<v Speaker 1>what take do you have that is too hot for

0:28:11.680 --> 0:28:17.160
<v Speaker 1>prime time? I recently wrote an Amtrak train and so

0:28:17.359 --> 0:28:19.200
<v Speaker 1>this is where that take comes from. And my hat

0:28:19.240 --> 0:28:26.280
<v Speaker 1>big take is that everything should have assigned seats. M Um.

0:28:26.280 --> 0:28:29.600
<v Speaker 1>When you are boarding an Amtrak train that is that

0:28:29.720 --> 0:28:32.200
<v Speaker 1>all crowded, which most of them are very crowded. It

0:28:32.359 --> 0:28:34.520
<v Speaker 1>is so stressful to try to find seats, especially if

0:28:34.520 --> 0:28:38.360
<v Speaker 1>you're with another person, and it's just like, why aren't

0:28:38.400 --> 0:28:41.080
<v Speaker 1>there assign seats like on an airplane? I don't understand,

0:28:41.400 --> 0:28:43.480
<v Speaker 1>and technology should be able to solve any problems you

0:28:43.520 --> 0:28:45.360
<v Speaker 1>can think of about this. But it's not just the

0:28:45.440 --> 0:28:47.320
<v Speaker 1>train that I think this would be better for. I

0:28:47.360 --> 0:28:49.920
<v Speaker 1>was wondering if this went beyond. Does have you been

0:28:49.960 --> 0:28:52.480
<v Speaker 1>to the movie theaters with a signed seats? They're usually

0:28:52.520 --> 0:28:55.480
<v Speaker 1>the fancy ones with like reclining seats. It's great. You

0:28:55.480 --> 0:28:57.360
<v Speaker 1>don't have to get to the movies half an hour

0:28:57.400 --> 0:28:59.120
<v Speaker 1>early to make sure you don't sit in the front row.

0:28:59.240 --> 0:29:01.280
<v Speaker 1>You know your seat is you get to sit there.

0:29:01.560 --> 0:29:05.200
<v Speaker 1>I don't understand why this is not just everywhere. Yeah,

0:29:05.240 --> 0:29:07.560
<v Speaker 1>they should put you in charge, and you should reorganize.

0:29:08.080 --> 0:29:13.760
<v Speaker 1>Leaving my career in journalism. It's just it's so have

0:29:13.880 --> 0:29:16.160
<v Speaker 1>you ever been on amtrack and tried to find a

0:29:16.200 --> 0:29:21.040
<v Speaker 1>seat together with one? It's terrible and rude. Yeah, and

0:29:21.120 --> 0:29:23.400
<v Speaker 1>movies like I prefer going to movies on my own

0:29:23.560 --> 0:29:25.520
<v Speaker 1>for the specific reason that it's so hard to find

0:29:25.520 --> 0:29:27.160
<v Speaker 1>two good seats next to each other, but you can

0:29:27.160 --> 0:29:31.760
<v Speaker 1>find one seat always, all right, FANTASTICA what's your hat? Pig?

0:29:31.760 --> 0:29:35.520
<v Speaker 1>Take mine? Is that? People? And it's it's a proposed

0:29:35.760 --> 0:29:40.440
<v Speaker 1>for this week's episode. I think people overuse the word nice.

0:29:41.480 --> 0:29:43.920
<v Speaker 1>I'm so on board with us. Oh really, so okay.

0:29:43.920 --> 0:29:46.760
<v Speaker 1>So I think people say nice when they just mean

0:29:46.880 --> 0:29:52.000
<v Speaker 1>someone is kind of polite or doesn't aggressively get in

0:29:52.040 --> 0:29:56.960
<v Speaker 1>your face about things. But I think that nice is

0:29:57.040 --> 0:30:00.600
<v Speaker 1>actually really a high compliment, Like you should call somebody

0:30:00.720 --> 0:30:03.840
<v Speaker 1>nice when there's someone who genuinely cares about other people,

0:30:03.880 --> 0:30:05.960
<v Speaker 1>that should be the criteria. And I often hear people

0:30:05.960 --> 0:30:08.440
<v Speaker 1>that I work with described as nice, and I'm like,

0:30:08.520 --> 0:30:11.000
<v Speaker 1>are they nice or are they just sort of well

0:30:11.040 --> 0:30:14.960
<v Speaker 1>spoken or polite or you know, nottings on time people

0:30:15.080 --> 0:30:19.800
<v Speaker 1>use it, and I hear a little bit of a insult. Yeah,

0:30:19.800 --> 0:30:22.680
<v Speaker 1>she's nice, it's nice. That means like you lack other qualities.

0:30:22.680 --> 0:30:25.560
<v Speaker 1>I actually think being genuinely nice it's pretty hard and

0:30:25.560 --> 0:30:27.560
<v Speaker 1>it's a It's a quality I think we should treasure.

0:30:27.880 --> 0:30:32.360
<v Speaker 1>When I was in high school, I used to say,

0:30:33.400 --> 0:30:36.000
<v Speaker 1>just because she's nice doesn't mean she's cool, which I

0:30:36.040 --> 0:30:38.320
<v Speaker 1>think gets at this problem. I realized it's kind of

0:30:38.320 --> 0:30:40.520
<v Speaker 1>a flip thing to say, but whatever, you're a teen,

0:30:41.480 --> 0:30:43.360
<v Speaker 1>but it does get at that thing where it's like

0:30:44.280 --> 0:30:46.800
<v Speaker 1>nice is not nice is kind of meaningless At this point,

0:30:47.000 --> 0:30:49.320
<v Speaker 1>it's lost its meaning. But yeah, that's a little bit

0:30:49.320 --> 0:30:51.280
<v Speaker 1>of a different point than mine. Okay, I mean I

0:30:51.400 --> 0:30:54.240
<v Speaker 1>both have feelings about nice. I think nice has lost it.

0:30:54.280 --> 0:30:58.560
<v Speaker 1>I think we should restore the meaning to nice, make

0:30:58.640 --> 0:31:06.160
<v Speaker 1>nice nice again. This has been half bake takes, half

0:31:06.200 --> 0:31:09.720
<v Speaker 1>baked takes. Thanks for listening to our show. You can

0:31:09.760 --> 0:31:12.520
<v Speaker 1>find me on Twitter at Francesca Today and I'm at

0:31:12.640 --> 0:31:17.280
<v Speaker 1>RZ Greenfield. And if you want more of us, go

0:31:17.520 --> 0:31:21.640
<v Speaker 1>subscribe to our newsletter at Bloomberg dot com slash Newsletters. Um.

0:31:21.680 --> 0:31:23.960
<v Speaker 1>If you have thoughts, tweet at us or call and

0:31:24.040 --> 0:31:26.760
<v Speaker 1>leave a voicemail at two on to six seven zero

0:31:26.800 --> 0:31:29.520
<v Speaker 1>one six. If you like this show, head on over

0:31:29.560 --> 0:31:31.720
<v Speaker 1>to Apple Podcasts where ever you listen and rate and

0:31:31.800 --> 0:31:35.840
<v Speaker 1>review and subscribe. We read every single one. This show

0:31:35.840 --> 0:31:39.360
<v Speaker 1>was produced by Liz Smith and Magnus hendricksonkad of podcast

0:31:39.520 --> 0:31:52.200
<v Speaker 1>is now me see you next week? Just do I

0:31:52.280 --> 0:31:55.320
<v Speaker 1>have to do the acting again? Do you think Leslie

0:31:55.400 --> 0:32:00.280
<v Speaker 1>acting again? Okay, acting, I'm really good at act saying

0:32:00.680 --> 0:32:01.520
<v Speaker 1>de do do do