WEBVTT - 26: How To Make Money By Betting On The U.K.’s Big Referendum

0:00:00.160 --> 0:00:02.320
<v Speaker 1>But knowledge to work and grow your business with c

0:00:02.520 --> 0:00:06.680
<v Speaker 1>i T from transportation to healthcare to manufacturing. C i

0:00:06.760 --> 0:00:10.520
<v Speaker 1>T offers commercial lending, leasing, and treasury management services for

0:00:10.600 --> 0:00:13.480
<v Speaker 1>small and middle market businesses. Learn more at c i

0:00:13.560 --> 0:00:28.200
<v Speaker 1>T dot com put Knowledge to Work. Hello and welcome

0:00:28.240 --> 0:00:31.440
<v Speaker 1>to another edition of the Odd LODs podcast. I'm Joe

0:00:31.440 --> 0:00:34.920
<v Speaker 1>wis Andthal, Managing editor at Bloomberg Markets, and I'm Tracy Alloway,

0:00:34.960 --> 0:00:38.280
<v Speaker 1>Executive editor at Bloomberg Markets. So Tracy, on our last

0:00:38.320 --> 0:00:41.480
<v Speaker 1>episode we talked a little bit about politics, and this

0:00:41.520 --> 0:00:45.680
<v Speaker 1>episode is about another political event that's coming up, the

0:00:45.800 --> 0:00:50.159
<v Speaker 1>upcoming Brexit vote. Brexit, of course, refers to this possibility

0:00:50.600 --> 0:00:54.360
<v Speaker 1>that on June three, when the UK holds its referendum,

0:00:54.400 --> 0:00:57.440
<v Speaker 1>that people might vote to leave the EU. And while

0:00:57.480 --> 0:01:01.240
<v Speaker 1>the expectation and the polls suggest that probably the UK

0:01:01.440 --> 0:01:03.880
<v Speaker 1>is going to stay in the EU, there is a

0:01:03.920 --> 0:01:08.960
<v Speaker 1>significant enough debate and doubt about this question that there's

0:01:09.080 --> 0:01:11.319
<v Speaker 1>a lot of excitement going into this vote. Have you've

0:01:11.319 --> 0:01:14.319
<v Speaker 1>been paying much attention to it, you know, obviously I'm

0:01:14.319 --> 0:01:16.880
<v Speaker 1>in market, so there's lots of people talking about the

0:01:16.920 --> 0:01:21.440
<v Speaker 1>potential impact on the financial system, on currencies, on the

0:01:21.560 --> 0:01:25.560
<v Speaker 1>unity of the EU, I also used to live in

0:01:25.600 --> 0:01:28.760
<v Speaker 1>the UK for about ten years, so I do take

0:01:28.800 --> 0:01:30.920
<v Speaker 1>a personal interest in this. So that's a long way

0:01:30.920 --> 0:01:33.920
<v Speaker 1>of saying yes, yeah, I'm really I'm really fascinated by

0:01:33.920 --> 0:01:36.600
<v Speaker 1>the story, and I just like, I just love votes, Like,

0:01:36.640 --> 0:01:38.600
<v Speaker 1>even if I don't have much of a stake in it,

0:01:38.680 --> 0:01:41.280
<v Speaker 1>anytime I hear of some big votes somewhere, it's like, oh, Philip,

0:01:41.280 --> 0:01:44.600
<v Speaker 1>your relationship. Scottish referendum. I just love the tension of

0:01:44.640 --> 0:01:47.000
<v Speaker 1>them because there's all this build up and then bam,

0:01:47.000 --> 0:01:51.200
<v Speaker 1>it's over in a second. So it's very exciting. Um

0:01:51.240 --> 0:01:54.920
<v Speaker 1>today we're going to talk kind of about this bregsit referendum,

0:01:54.920 --> 0:01:57.800
<v Speaker 1>but we're going to talk about it at a unique angle,

0:01:57.840 --> 0:02:01.160
<v Speaker 1>which is the gambling side of it. So people are

0:02:01.200 --> 0:02:04.200
<v Speaker 1>betting on whether or not Brexit will take place, right

0:02:04.240 --> 0:02:06.560
<v Speaker 1>So unlike you know in the US, we have this

0:02:06.600 --> 0:02:09.320
<v Speaker 1>sort of weird relationship with gambling where a lot of

0:02:09.320 --> 0:02:12.840
<v Speaker 1>people like to bet on things, but it's also heavily restricted.

0:02:13.080 --> 0:02:16.600
<v Speaker 1>There only select locations or select states and select things

0:02:16.639 --> 0:02:19.960
<v Speaker 1>you're allowed to bet on. In the UK, they just

0:02:20.120 --> 0:02:22.880
<v Speaker 1>love to bet on everything and it's wide out in

0:02:22.919 --> 0:02:28.080
<v Speaker 1>the open. So obviously the soccer teams. They're openly advertised

0:02:28.080 --> 0:02:29.680
<v Speaker 1>that you can bet on them. It's just much more

0:02:29.760 --> 0:02:34.119
<v Speaker 1>part of the culture, including betting on political outcomes. Right,

0:02:34.240 --> 0:02:37.240
<v Speaker 1>So I remember this from personal experience. You could go

0:02:37.280 --> 0:02:39.840
<v Speaker 1>to the bookies. You could bet on all sorts of

0:02:39.880 --> 0:02:42.400
<v Speaker 1>sports games. Obviously I did it for the World Cup

0:02:42.440 --> 0:02:44.600
<v Speaker 1>in two thousand and six. I remember you could bet

0:02:44.600 --> 0:02:47.320
<v Speaker 1>on more esoteric things like like you could bet on

0:02:47.440 --> 0:02:49.680
<v Speaker 1>who the next Pope is going to be, right they

0:02:49.720 --> 0:02:51.760
<v Speaker 1>said odds for stuff like that, or whether or not

0:02:51.880 --> 0:02:54.040
<v Speaker 1>Harry Potter is going to die at the end of

0:02:54.080 --> 0:02:57.200
<v Speaker 1>the Harry Potter series. All sorts of things. And so

0:02:57.240 --> 0:03:00.920
<v Speaker 1>of course you can bet on political outcome ms in

0:03:01.000 --> 0:03:02.840
<v Speaker 1>the UK they've been doing it for a long time.

0:03:02.960 --> 0:03:07.200
<v Speaker 1>And today we're going to talk about the expert in

0:03:07.280 --> 0:03:11.200
<v Speaker 1>political betting. His name is Mike Smithson, a former politician.

0:03:11.560 --> 0:03:14.840
<v Speaker 1>He now runs the website political betting dot com and

0:03:14.880 --> 0:03:17.480
<v Speaker 1>he wrote a book specifically about how to make money

0:03:17.800 --> 0:03:21.640
<v Speaker 1>betting on politics. Interesting, so has he used his political

0:03:21.680 --> 0:03:26.400
<v Speaker 1>experience to become an experience on betting on politics? I

0:03:26.440 --> 0:03:28.480
<v Speaker 1>guess we're going to find out, and I hope we

0:03:28.520 --> 0:03:31.639
<v Speaker 1>get some tips on how we can make money getting

0:03:31.639 --> 0:03:34.120
<v Speaker 1>on politics in the future. What are the tricks to

0:03:34.240 --> 0:03:46.960
<v Speaker 1>use to beat the system? All right, Mike Smithson, you're

0:03:47.040 --> 0:03:50.200
<v Speaker 1>the editor of Political betting dot Com. Thank you very

0:03:50.280 --> 0:03:52.280
<v Speaker 1>much for joining us. They liked it to be on

0:03:52.320 --> 0:03:55.800
<v Speaker 1>the program. Thanks Mike. Uh So, Mike, tell us about

0:03:55.840 --> 0:03:59.520
<v Speaker 1>the gambling market in the UK and the upcoming Brexit referendum.

0:03:59.560 --> 0:04:03.520
<v Speaker 1>How much money are people betting on this? On this event?

0:04:04.240 --> 0:04:08.120
<v Speaker 1>This has been the biggest political betting event of all

0:04:08.200 --> 0:04:11.880
<v Speaker 1>time that I've I've certainly been doing this for about

0:04:11.880 --> 0:04:16.200
<v Speaker 1>fifteen years and we're getting on the betting exchanges, which

0:04:16.240 --> 0:04:20.080
<v Speaker 1>operates where where buyers and sellers come together. We've been

0:04:20.080 --> 0:04:23.320
<v Speaker 1>getting up to a million pounds a day being traded.

0:04:23.720 --> 0:04:27.120
<v Speaker 1>And that's extraordinary for this to be happening eight weeks

0:04:27.120 --> 0:04:29.279
<v Speaker 1>out because the election, of course takes place eight weeks

0:04:29.320 --> 0:04:33.279
<v Speaker 1>eight weeks today. And simply it's not it's it's taken

0:04:33.320 --> 0:04:38.000
<v Speaker 1>everybody by surprise this year's scale. Generally speaking with with elections,

0:04:38.040 --> 0:04:42.240
<v Speaker 1>you nobody really pays any attention on the betting markets

0:04:42.200 --> 0:04:45.240
<v Speaker 1>still in about four or five days beforehand, so this

0:04:45.360 --> 0:04:49.320
<v Speaker 1>is absolutely massive. Is it popular in terms of betting?

0:04:49.360 --> 0:04:52.719
<v Speaker 1>Because it's basically a binary outcome, it's either yes or no.

0:04:52.880 --> 0:04:55.160
<v Speaker 1>Does that make it easier to bet on or place odds?

0:04:55.200 --> 0:04:58.279
<v Speaker 1>And someone, oh, yes, it's It makes it much much

0:04:58.320 --> 0:05:01.440
<v Speaker 1>simpler because you know, there there is. It gets compared

0:05:01.480 --> 0:05:04.640
<v Speaker 1>with a general election in the UK, which are quite complicated,

0:05:04.960 --> 0:05:07.560
<v Speaker 1>where it's much harder to work out the tours might

0:05:07.600 --> 0:05:10.200
<v Speaker 1>be they won the last election on thirty six point

0:05:10.320 --> 0:05:13.280
<v Speaker 1>nine percent of the vote, so that was not so obvious.

0:05:13.279 --> 0:05:16.680
<v Speaker 1>Wherever something like this, it is blindingly obvious from the

0:05:16.720 --> 0:05:19.920
<v Speaker 1>polling which way it's going, and it's and people adjust

0:05:19.960 --> 0:05:23.000
<v Speaker 1>their bets accordingly, and there's a massive amount of polling

0:05:23.040 --> 0:05:25.800
<v Speaker 1>analysis goes on and people every new poll that comes out,

0:05:26.200 --> 0:05:28.680
<v Speaker 1>people try to look and seek to undermine it or

0:05:28.680 --> 0:05:31.400
<v Speaker 1>seek to does it reinforce their positions and so on,

0:05:32.080 --> 0:05:34.600
<v Speaker 1>and it's it's it is. It is a fascinating period.

0:05:34.720 --> 0:05:36.960
<v Speaker 1>All right. Let's back up a minute, because to an

0:05:36.960 --> 0:05:41.360
<v Speaker 1>American audience, the idea that politics is a big thing

0:05:41.480 --> 0:05:45.719
<v Speaker 1>where people openly bed and openly tracked the gambling odds

0:05:45.839 --> 0:05:48.600
<v Speaker 1>is a weird thing. What's the history of political betting

0:05:48.960 --> 0:05:51.880
<v Speaker 1>in the UK? How did political events come to be

0:05:52.000 --> 0:05:56.080
<v Speaker 1>this thing that professional bookmakers and gamblers took interest in

0:05:57.040 --> 0:05:59.680
<v Speaker 1>a fact it goes back for century a couple of

0:05:59.680 --> 0:06:03.160
<v Speaker 1>century is that a better used to be illegal except

0:06:03.200 --> 0:06:07.880
<v Speaker 1>on race courses, but you would have a certain bookmakers

0:06:08.000 --> 0:06:11.120
<v Speaker 1>were able to operate this again that in the nineteenth

0:06:11.120 --> 0:06:14.720
<v Speaker 1>century were able to operate credit accounts, and what would

0:06:14.720 --> 0:06:17.960
<v Speaker 1>happen is that within the sort of London clubs people

0:06:18.000 --> 0:06:20.719
<v Speaker 1>would be placing pets and that would be that would

0:06:20.720 --> 0:06:23.240
<v Speaker 1>be sort of legal. But the big thing that where

0:06:23.240 --> 0:06:27.600
<v Speaker 1>it took off was in ninety one when betting betting

0:06:27.640 --> 0:06:31.599
<v Speaker 1>over the counter in shops, betting for virtually everybody was

0:06:31.640 --> 0:06:35.080
<v Speaker 1>made legal and since then it is exploded. And of

0:06:35.080 --> 0:06:39.080
<v Speaker 1>course what people love doing is matching their own predictions

0:06:39.120 --> 0:06:42.160
<v Speaker 1>of an outcome by putting their money on and risking

0:06:42.320 --> 0:06:45.400
<v Speaker 1>risking their cash on it. Joe was telling me earlier

0:06:45.440 --> 0:06:48.880
<v Speaker 1>in the segment that you actually used to be in politics.

0:06:48.920 --> 0:06:52.240
<v Speaker 1>You were with the Liberal Democrats. Can you maybe make

0:06:52.279 --> 0:06:55.200
<v Speaker 1>the connection between being in politics and then going on

0:06:55.600 --> 0:06:59.840
<v Speaker 1>to actually become an expert on political betting? Oh? Yes,

0:06:59.880 --> 0:07:03.480
<v Speaker 1>I think you understand the dynamics of elections a lot more.

0:07:03.960 --> 0:07:07.000
<v Speaker 1>You understand the sorts of people who votes. So for instance,

0:07:07.040 --> 0:07:09.960
<v Speaker 1>at the moment that The critical thing is turn out.

0:07:10.320 --> 0:07:13.080
<v Speaker 1>We don't know clearly how many people are going to

0:07:13.120 --> 0:07:17.400
<v Speaker 1>turn out, but we do know that from my experience

0:07:17.400 --> 0:07:19.320
<v Speaker 1>on the ground and I just stop being in politics

0:07:19.920 --> 0:07:23.840
<v Speaker 1>twenty years ago, is that people who voted in previous

0:07:23.840 --> 0:07:26.480
<v Speaker 1>elections are the ones that most likely to vote in

0:07:26.560 --> 0:07:29.560
<v Speaker 1>future elections. And if you've got a history of never voting,

0:07:29.600 --> 0:07:31.560
<v Speaker 1>then the chances are you're not you're going to be

0:07:31.760 --> 0:07:34.800
<v Speaker 1>less likely to vote in the coming election. So all

0:07:34.840 --> 0:07:38.120
<v Speaker 1>the polling analysis is really based on that's that's that

0:07:38.280 --> 0:07:42.200
<v Speaker 1>sort of that sort of thing. Generally speaking, UK pollsters asked,

0:07:42.280 --> 0:07:43.960
<v Speaker 1>you know, could you rate on a scale of one

0:07:44.000 --> 0:07:46.360
<v Speaker 1>to tend whether whether or not you're likely to vote

0:07:46.440 --> 0:07:49.960
<v Speaker 1>or not? And there are And what we're finding is

0:07:50.040 --> 0:07:53.559
<v Speaker 1>that a lot more people who are saying they're voted

0:07:53.680 --> 0:07:57.760
<v Speaker 1>they want to vote leave I'll say, are saying that.

0:07:57.800 --> 0:08:01.360
<v Speaker 1>But if you then analyze the back ground where they

0:08:01.440 --> 0:08:04.280
<v Speaker 1>come from, are you their socio economic groups, you discover

0:08:04.600 --> 0:08:07.000
<v Speaker 1>that they are the most least likely to vote it

0:08:07.040 --> 0:08:09.320
<v Speaker 1>to vote in elections. So you've got to sort of

0:08:09.360 --> 0:08:13.880
<v Speaker 1>balance that down. And that's that's where a debate with

0:08:14.040 --> 0:08:16.520
<v Speaker 1>people like me, where it comes down to what's the

0:08:16.560 --> 0:08:20.800
<v Speaker 1>turn it going to be so from your expert analysis

0:08:20.840 --> 0:08:23.320
<v Speaker 1>and having watched these things so far, where do you

0:08:23.400 --> 0:08:26.400
<v Speaker 1>stand based on the polling and what you read into

0:08:26.400 --> 0:08:28.400
<v Speaker 1>the polling? See Mike. This is the point at which

0:08:28.480 --> 0:08:32.080
<v Speaker 1>Joe asked you for betting toes um Well and and

0:08:32.080 --> 0:08:35.079
<v Speaker 1>and yeah and how do so? What do you see

0:08:35.120 --> 0:08:38.640
<v Speaker 1>as the likely outcome of the Brexit referendum? And be

0:08:39.559 --> 0:08:42.960
<v Speaker 1>do does your assessment match up with the current adds? Well?

0:08:43.000 --> 0:08:45.440
<v Speaker 1>First of all, as my own gambling is, I tend

0:08:45.480 --> 0:08:48.720
<v Speaker 1>to bet on betting, So if I think that there

0:08:48.760 --> 0:08:51.640
<v Speaker 1>will be a move towards leaving the betting, then I

0:08:51.679 --> 0:08:53.319
<v Speaker 1>will get on there so I'll be able to get

0:08:53.320 --> 0:08:55.679
<v Speaker 1>out of that position later. So it's not it's not

0:08:55.760 --> 0:08:59.079
<v Speaker 1>just a complete simple thing betting on an overall outcome.

0:08:59.400 --> 0:09:04.199
<v Speaker 1>But my reading at the moment is that probably we're

0:09:04.240 --> 0:09:07.240
<v Speaker 1>going to vote to stay in the in the European Union,

0:09:08.280 --> 0:09:11.960
<v Speaker 1>but I wouldn't be totally totally certain of that, and

0:09:12.040 --> 0:09:16.439
<v Speaker 1>currently the markets make it about a probability, which I

0:09:16.480 --> 0:09:19.119
<v Speaker 1>think is about right. So you mentioned something very important

0:09:19.160 --> 0:09:21.319
<v Speaker 1>that's different from how most people in the US think

0:09:21.360 --> 0:09:24.680
<v Speaker 1>of betting, which is that when you place a bet

0:09:24.760 --> 0:09:28.000
<v Speaker 1>on leave or stay. These you have a tradeable asset,

0:09:28.080 --> 0:09:29.640
<v Speaker 1>so it's not just that you have to hold on

0:09:29.720 --> 0:09:31.760
<v Speaker 1>to it and wait till the outcome. But if the

0:09:31.800 --> 0:09:34.720
<v Speaker 1>odds move nicely in the favor of your bed before

0:09:34.760 --> 0:09:37.240
<v Speaker 1>then you can lay it off and take a profit

0:09:37.360 --> 0:09:39.960
<v Speaker 1>before the ultimate results. So it's really much more like

0:09:40.040 --> 0:09:43.160
<v Speaker 1>a trading than just a pure buy a ticket and

0:09:43.200 --> 0:09:47.120
<v Speaker 1>then wait until the outcome. That's precisely and as a

0:09:47.160 --> 0:09:51.560
<v Speaker 1>result of modern betting systems and certainly online systems, those

0:09:51.640 --> 0:09:54.880
<v Speaker 1>complexitis can be handled and handled very well. And that's

0:09:54.920 --> 0:09:57.280
<v Speaker 1>that's one reason that one of the things really given

0:09:57.280 --> 0:10:01.400
<v Speaker 1>a boost to a political betting, that the ability to

0:10:01.400 --> 0:10:03.960
<v Speaker 1>to be able to take a view one day, make

0:10:04.040 --> 0:10:06.880
<v Speaker 1>a profit three or four days later, and then perhaps

0:10:06.960 --> 0:10:09.360
<v Speaker 1>bet the other side of the week after. Now you

0:10:09.440 --> 0:10:14.640
<v Speaker 1>mentioned the extraordinary um, the extraordinary monetary volume of Brexit

0:10:15.000 --> 0:10:18.080
<v Speaker 1>vetting betting on this referendum, and of course there are

0:10:18.080 --> 0:10:24.600
<v Speaker 1>a large economic ramifications, financial ramifications, ramifications for sterling the

0:10:24.640 --> 0:10:28.600
<v Speaker 1>currency specifically, is there much hedging going on, so people

0:10:28.600 --> 0:10:32.400
<v Speaker 1>are trying to hedge a certain position in the currency

0:10:32.520 --> 0:10:36.760
<v Speaker 1>market with a binary bet and somehow exploit an opportunity

0:10:37.280 --> 0:10:40.920
<v Speaker 1>a discrepancy between the two. I think that there is

0:10:40.960 --> 0:10:43.359
<v Speaker 1>that going on at the moment, and I think increasingly

0:10:43.440 --> 0:10:46.680
<v Speaker 1>that that that will take place. I mean, to my mind,

0:10:46.720 --> 0:10:49.559
<v Speaker 1>one of the best indicators it actually the value of

0:10:49.600 --> 0:10:51.400
<v Speaker 1>the pound against the dollar and the value of the

0:10:51.440 --> 0:10:54.880
<v Speaker 1>pound against the your bow. And if there is a

0:10:54.960 --> 0:10:59.240
<v Speaker 1>confidence that they that that we will vote for remain,

0:10:59.640 --> 0:11:02.760
<v Speaker 1>then seems to increase the increase the value. And I certainly,

0:11:02.960 --> 0:11:05.400
<v Speaker 1>in terms of my own tracking, I watch I watch

0:11:05.440 --> 0:11:08.599
<v Speaker 1>those Curvency screens as well as I watch other screens.

0:11:08.640 --> 0:11:11.520
<v Speaker 1>So I have a sort of existential question, which is,

0:11:11.920 --> 0:11:15.840
<v Speaker 1>you know, it's all very fun and interesting to watch

0:11:16.760 --> 0:11:20.760
<v Speaker 1>the Brexit betting, and we're seeing lots of money exchanging

0:11:20.840 --> 0:11:25.360
<v Speaker 1>hands based on this referendum, But is there any social

0:11:25.520 --> 0:11:30.840
<v Speaker 1>value to political betting because people often people often characterize

0:11:30.880 --> 0:11:33.600
<v Speaker 1>the stock market as sometimes a bit of a casino.

0:11:33.679 --> 0:11:37.400
<v Speaker 1>People are essentially gambling on the likelihood of companies succeeding

0:11:37.520 --> 0:11:39.440
<v Speaker 1>or not. But at least you can say that the

0:11:39.480 --> 0:11:44.720
<v Speaker 1>stock market is diverting money into actual capital, whereas this

0:11:45.360 --> 0:11:49.280
<v Speaker 1>is pure, pure bedding. Yes, um, I don't think there's

0:11:49.280 --> 0:11:52.520
<v Speaker 1>any social value at all. I think it's just providing

0:11:52.960 --> 0:11:56.120
<v Speaker 1>a means whereby people can bet back up their own

0:11:56.120 --> 0:12:01.240
<v Speaker 1>opinion by risking their own cash and wear their amounts. Yeah,

0:12:02.200 --> 0:12:06.080
<v Speaker 1>I can't see any social facular at all. Thank you, Mike.

0:12:06.240 --> 0:12:08.320
<v Speaker 1>We'll be right back with you. But first a quick

0:12:08.360 --> 0:12:15.960
<v Speaker 1>word from a sponsor, but knowledge to work and grow

0:12:16.000 --> 0:12:19.640
<v Speaker 1>your business with c i T from transportation to healthcare

0:12:19.679 --> 0:12:23.240
<v Speaker 1>to manufacturing. C i T offers commercial lending, leasing, and

0:12:23.280 --> 0:12:27.240
<v Speaker 1>treasury management services for small and middle market businesses. Learn

0:12:27.280 --> 0:12:30.160
<v Speaker 1>more at c i T dot com put knowledge to Work.

0:12:40.320 --> 0:12:43.720
<v Speaker 1>We're back with Mike Smithson, uh, the editor of Political

0:12:43.840 --> 0:12:47.840
<v Speaker 1>Betting dot com. So we've talked about this upcoming referendum

0:12:47.840 --> 0:12:50.319
<v Speaker 1>and what the odds are saying. Do you have any

0:12:51.000 --> 0:12:54.720
<v Speaker 1>great examples of the markets having gotten it totally wrong

0:12:54.760 --> 0:12:58.480
<v Speaker 1>in the past, or uh, something in history that really

0:12:58.520 --> 0:13:01.640
<v Speaker 1>struck you as a particular the important or pivotal moment

0:13:01.760 --> 0:13:06.240
<v Speaker 1>for political betting in the UK. Yes, Certainly to the

0:13:06.320 --> 0:13:10.840
<v Speaker 1>last UK general election in two thousand and fifteen, none

0:13:10.880 --> 0:13:13.840
<v Speaker 1>of the all the markets pointed to. Perhaps the tour

0:13:14.000 --> 0:13:16.920
<v Speaker 1>is the Conservatives certainly winning most seats in the House

0:13:16.960 --> 0:13:20.320
<v Speaker 1>of Commons, but it was very much a long shot

0:13:20.400 --> 0:13:23.680
<v Speaker 1>that they that that Cameron could win an overall majority,

0:13:23.880 --> 0:13:26.480
<v Speaker 1>which of course he did. And in fact, even even

0:13:26.679 --> 0:13:29.040
<v Speaker 1>when the results were coming in, when the exit polls

0:13:29.040 --> 0:13:33.760
<v Speaker 1>were coming in, you could still get an overall majority.

0:13:33.840 --> 0:13:36.200
<v Speaker 1>Was just rated as a ten percent chance, and it

0:13:36.240 --> 0:13:38.640
<v Speaker 1>took a lot more results to coming before it turned

0:13:38.640 --> 0:13:41.679
<v Speaker 1>and people realize that, in fact the Conservatives were going

0:13:41.720 --> 0:13:43.840
<v Speaker 1>to win a majority. That was just that was just

0:13:43.920 --> 0:13:47.439
<v Speaker 1>a year ago. So this this, this, this does happen.

0:13:47.679 --> 0:13:52.040
<v Speaker 1>We also know that that people with an interest of

0:13:52.120 --> 0:13:55.720
<v Speaker 1>trying to influence betting prices in order to create a

0:13:55.800 --> 0:14:00.280
<v Speaker 1>sense of momentum. We saw that with the two uson

0:14:00.280 --> 0:14:05.200
<v Speaker 1>and twelve the White House race. When the old Irish

0:14:05.600 --> 0:14:08.520
<v Speaker 1>Exchange in Trade, which I don't think it exists any longer,

0:14:09.000 --> 0:14:11.280
<v Speaker 1>where where where the the the amount of money that

0:14:11.360 --> 0:14:14.320
<v Speaker 1>was going on Romney was simply out of keeping what

0:14:14.360 --> 0:14:16.680
<v Speaker 1>the polls were saying, and was also out of keeping.

0:14:16.679 --> 0:14:21.040
<v Speaker 1>We watched what the London based exchange were showing and

0:14:21.080 --> 0:14:23.880
<v Speaker 1>there was a quite a large arbitration opportunity. If you

0:14:23.920 --> 0:14:25.560
<v Speaker 1>wanted to get involved in that. It was just going

0:14:25.600 --> 0:14:29.640
<v Speaker 1>to ask how big is that cross exchange arbitrage of

0:14:29.720 --> 0:14:35.000
<v Speaker 1>different contracts and different trading platforms. That's certainly, it's certainly possible,

0:14:35.120 --> 0:14:38.680
<v Speaker 1>it's certainly there, but you've got to act extremely quickly

0:14:38.880 --> 0:14:42.160
<v Speaker 1>in order because deefinitely speaking, a good position like that

0:14:42.200 --> 0:14:45.280
<v Speaker 1>won't last very long. Though we we we did get

0:14:45.720 --> 0:14:49.200
<v Speaker 1>some quite extraordinary betting moves on this on the referendum

0:14:49.360 --> 0:14:52.360
<v Speaker 1>about last week or the week before last, when the

0:14:52.400 --> 0:14:55.960
<v Speaker 1>contrary to where the poles were going, the the leavers

0:14:56.080 --> 0:14:59.000
<v Speaker 1>the leaf the leavers were seeing a huge amount of

0:14:59.000 --> 0:15:03.400
<v Speaker 1>money going on them, and then then that sort of ceased,

0:15:03.400 --> 0:15:07.240
<v Speaker 1>and of course in order to if the if you're

0:15:07.280 --> 0:15:11.240
<v Speaker 1>putting forward a bet that's offering value to the other

0:15:11.560 --> 0:15:14.480
<v Speaker 1>the other side that's greater than that perhaps it should be,

0:15:14.720 --> 0:15:16.880
<v Speaker 1>then people obviously just sweep it up. It's just a

0:15:16.960 --> 0:15:21.680
<v Speaker 1>normal market operating well. So, speaking of discrepancies across betting platforms,

0:15:21.720 --> 0:15:25.640
<v Speaker 1>how do the bookies actually make their odds for things

0:15:25.680 --> 0:15:28.520
<v Speaker 1>that are often not that clear cut? We're talking about

0:15:28.560 --> 0:15:31.920
<v Speaker 1>a wide variety of outcomes, right, Well, there are two

0:15:31.920 --> 0:15:35.440
<v Speaker 1>sorts of bookmakers in certainly in the UK there were

0:15:35.440 --> 0:15:38.880
<v Speaker 1>those which have an exchange which actually seek to bring back,

0:15:39.200 --> 0:15:42.120
<v Speaker 1>bring forward to people who want to make a bet together.

0:15:42.200 --> 0:15:47.280
<v Speaker 1>It's all super fast and operated online. Uh and that

0:15:47.400 --> 0:15:49.880
<v Speaker 1>that that's that's one thing where the other sorts of

0:15:49.880 --> 0:15:52.680
<v Speaker 1>where you've got traditional bookmakers who work out and try

0:15:52.720 --> 0:15:55.080
<v Speaker 1>to thick work out what the odds are. They will

0:15:55.120 --> 0:15:58.160
<v Speaker 1>put odds up, but they will see if if if

0:15:58.160 --> 0:16:00.200
<v Speaker 1>they've if they've got it's wrong, they'll find a lot

0:16:00.240 --> 0:16:03.000
<v Speaker 1>of people coming onto them if or they'll find that

0:16:03.040 --> 0:16:05.920
<v Speaker 1>nobody's interested in the prices they're offering. So it's in

0:16:05.960 --> 0:16:07.800
<v Speaker 1>fact it's working in the same way so that the

0:16:08.120 --> 0:16:11.440
<v Speaker 1>odds will eventually work out in terms of what what

0:16:11.440 --> 0:16:14.000
<v Speaker 1>what the market is wanting. So one of the things

0:16:14.000 --> 0:16:16.720
<v Speaker 1>that always comes up when we discuss these kinds of markets,

0:16:16.720 --> 0:16:19.960
<v Speaker 1>they're always people who say all they do is track

0:16:20.040 --> 0:16:23.480
<v Speaker 1>conventional wisdom. They don't have any sort of particular They

0:16:23.480 --> 0:16:26.640
<v Speaker 1>don't offer us any particular insight. Others say, are the

0:16:26.680 --> 0:16:29.800
<v Speaker 1>markets are the clearest signal we have? Where do you

0:16:29.840 --> 0:16:32.520
<v Speaker 1>come down on this? Do markets do they usually get

0:16:32.560 --> 0:16:35.960
<v Speaker 1>it right? Are they what is their track record as

0:16:36.000 --> 0:16:39.200
<v Speaker 1>being a tool to forecast what's actually going to happen?

0:16:39.440 --> 0:16:42.200
<v Speaker 1>I think the best example of that were in two

0:16:42.200 --> 0:16:45.880
<v Speaker 1>thousand and fourteen September we had the refermendum in Scotland

0:16:46.200 --> 0:16:51.400
<v Speaker 1>on Scotland going for independence, and about ten days before that,

0:16:52.160 --> 0:16:55.360
<v Speaker 1>suddenly we have polls which were showing that the vote

0:16:55.360 --> 0:16:59.600
<v Speaker 1>would be for independence. Remember that, And what was interesting

0:16:59.720 --> 0:17:02.480
<v Speaker 1>is that the betting markets hardly turned on that, but

0:17:02.800 --> 0:17:07.439
<v Speaker 1>hardly any movement, and and and I think that that

0:17:07.760 --> 0:17:10.200
<v Speaker 1>represented that there was a different view being taken by

0:17:10.240 --> 0:17:13.520
<v Speaker 1>gamblers compared with what the polls were showing people. So

0:17:13.600 --> 0:17:16.159
<v Speaker 1>the pundits were losing their heads, but the gamblers stayed

0:17:16.160 --> 0:17:19.000
<v Speaker 1>cool and got it right, I think, so, yes, I know,

0:17:19.160 --> 0:17:21.600
<v Speaker 1>I remember on that one I was I tried to

0:17:22.160 --> 0:17:24.480
<v Speaker 1>I saw that pole. I thought, well, everybody's going to

0:17:24.520 --> 0:17:28.920
<v Speaker 1>be wanting to bet on Scottish such as getting independence.

0:17:29.520 --> 0:17:32.639
<v Speaker 1>And unfortunately the market didn't move and never had a

0:17:32.720 --> 0:17:35.720
<v Speaker 1>chance to take advantage of Alright, so we just have

0:17:35.920 --> 0:17:38.720
<v Speaker 1>a few minutes left. So let's say someone wants to

0:17:38.760 --> 0:17:42.720
<v Speaker 1>get into political betting. Obviously it would take a long

0:17:42.800 --> 0:17:45.960
<v Speaker 1>time for anyone to match your years of experience and

0:17:46.000 --> 0:17:49.000
<v Speaker 1>watching markets. But give us a few tips as a

0:17:49.000 --> 0:17:52.800
<v Speaker 1>as a pro in this area. What are some things

0:17:52.880 --> 0:17:55.400
<v Speaker 1>that people can do to improve their chances of success

0:17:55.480 --> 0:17:59.520
<v Speaker 1>in these markets. The most important thing is to disregard

0:17:59.760 --> 0:18:04.000
<v Speaker 1>your own what your own desires are, and it's very

0:18:04.080 --> 0:18:07.640
<v Speaker 1>easy to think I want to I want Barack Obama

0:18:07.680 --> 0:18:10.880
<v Speaker 1>to win, I want Donald Trump to win. You've got

0:18:10.920 --> 0:18:14.640
<v Speaker 1>to disregard that completely, and that is that is quite challenging,

0:18:14.640 --> 0:18:18.760
<v Speaker 1>because that the chances are. You will then interpret all

0:18:18.800 --> 0:18:21.200
<v Speaker 1>the evidence in line with what your what what your

0:18:21.200 --> 0:18:24.080
<v Speaker 1>desires are. That's the most important thing, and a lot

0:18:24.119 --> 0:18:27.720
<v Speaker 1>of people find that very difficult to do. Uh. Secondly,

0:18:27.760 --> 0:18:31.160
<v Speaker 1>you've really got to be watching for value. It's when

0:18:31.720 --> 0:18:34.480
<v Speaker 1>something comes up and you think, wow, that's a that's

0:18:34.480 --> 0:18:37.639
<v Speaker 1>a good price. You think something's ten percent chance, and

0:18:37.680 --> 0:18:39.720
<v Speaker 1>you find that the bets of the pricing on it

0:18:39.760 --> 0:18:42.760
<v Speaker 1>is only making it a five chance, then you've got

0:18:42.800 --> 0:18:46.080
<v Speaker 1>a value bet. And that's that that happened. That happens

0:18:46.119 --> 0:18:50.320
<v Speaker 1>all the time. Um So it's it's it's looking at it,

0:18:50.600 --> 0:18:54.040
<v Speaker 1>making your own objective assessment of what you think that

0:18:54.080 --> 0:18:57.880
<v Speaker 1>the chances of this event happening, and then looking at

0:18:57.880 --> 0:19:00.680
<v Speaker 1>the betting price. And if if your assessment it's better

0:19:00.760 --> 0:19:02.720
<v Speaker 1>them the price that you can get from the bookies,

0:19:02.760 --> 0:19:04.760
<v Speaker 1>then you you obviously bet. If it's not, then you

0:19:04.840 --> 0:19:08.560
<v Speaker 1>don't any anything else. We're just about out of time.

0:19:08.600 --> 0:19:14.520
<v Speaker 1>One last tip for people, UM, be careful. That's probably

0:19:14.520 --> 0:19:17.960
<v Speaker 1>the best advice, isn't it? All right? Mike Smithson and

0:19:18.000 --> 0:19:20.680
<v Speaker 1>thank you so much. This is a fascinating topic and

0:19:20.760 --> 0:19:24.680
<v Speaker 1>a fascinating lens through which we can watch the Breggsit

0:19:24.760 --> 0:19:28.120
<v Speaker 1>vote over the coming weeks. Really appreciate you sharing your

0:19:28.160 --> 0:19:39.959
<v Speaker 1>experience on this topic with us. So, Tracy, are you

0:19:40.040 --> 0:19:44.040
<v Speaker 1>going to place a wager on the upcoming breggs A referendum? Uh?

0:19:44.480 --> 0:19:49.399
<v Speaker 1>You know, I don't feel a lot of well, I

0:19:49.400 --> 0:19:52.439
<v Speaker 1>don't feel much of an urge to put my money

0:19:52.520 --> 0:19:54.840
<v Speaker 1>where my mind is. I did think it was interesting

0:19:54.840 --> 0:19:59.639
<v Speaker 1>that Mike brought up this idea that one of the

0:19:59.680 --> 0:20:01.879
<v Speaker 1>things people have to watch out for the most is

0:20:01.920 --> 0:20:05.000
<v Speaker 1>to avoid sort of confirmation bias and the idea that

0:20:05.119 --> 0:20:07.600
<v Speaker 1>they want to put money on the people that they

0:20:07.680 --> 0:20:10.600
<v Speaker 1>want to see in power. Yeah. I also am fascinated

0:20:10.600 --> 0:20:13.960
<v Speaker 1>by how big this particular market has gotten. And I mean,

0:20:14.000 --> 0:20:16.200
<v Speaker 1>there's no way to know for sure, but it does

0:20:16.280 --> 0:20:19.320
<v Speaker 1>seem to make sense that for people who have a

0:20:19.400 --> 0:20:23.199
<v Speaker 1>significant financial stake in the outcome of this referendum, that

0:20:23.320 --> 0:20:26.480
<v Speaker 1>the size and liquidity of this market not for huge players,

0:20:26.520 --> 0:20:29.560
<v Speaker 1>but for smaller players, you might want to place a

0:20:29.600 --> 0:20:33.240
<v Speaker 1>wager to sort of head your exposure to a brexit. Right.

0:20:33.280 --> 0:20:36.080
<v Speaker 1>I do like the idea that there's a secondary market,

0:20:36.160 --> 0:20:40.280
<v Speaker 1>there's all this arbitrage going on. It's really financialized. Actually, yeah, no,

0:20:40.400 --> 0:20:42.000
<v Speaker 1>that's really cool, and that's one of the things that

0:20:42.080 --> 0:20:46.000
<v Speaker 1>just generally seems cooler about betting in the UK versus Vegas.

0:20:46.400 --> 0:20:49.119
<v Speaker 1>In the in Vegas, obviously you place a bed at

0:20:49.119 --> 0:20:50.600
<v Speaker 1>a sports book and then you walk away and you

0:20:50.640 --> 0:20:52.840
<v Speaker 1>see the outcome. But it seems so much more fun

0:20:53.200 --> 0:20:55.439
<v Speaker 1>if you could then have this very liquid market to

0:20:55.520 --> 0:21:00.600
<v Speaker 1>trade that ticket, to arbitrage across multiple trading player forums,

0:21:00.600 --> 0:21:05.040
<v Speaker 1>to invest, to make a bet with the expectation that

0:21:05.080 --> 0:21:07.120
<v Speaker 1>you're not going to win, but that at some point

0:21:07.119 --> 0:21:08.919
<v Speaker 1>the odds will move in your favor and then you

0:21:08.920 --> 0:21:11.399
<v Speaker 1>can sell it to all kinds of It just seems

0:21:11.480 --> 0:21:13.639
<v Speaker 1>very fun to me, right, And I know I asked

0:21:13.680 --> 0:21:17.200
<v Speaker 1>if there was a social value to this kind of speculation,

0:21:17.520 --> 0:21:20.560
<v Speaker 1>and Mike was pretty upfront saying no, not really, it's

0:21:20.600 --> 0:21:24.080
<v Speaker 1>basically pure gambling. But I do like the idea that

0:21:24.119 --> 0:21:26.840
<v Speaker 1>he brought up about how this can have a predictive

0:21:26.920 --> 0:21:31.280
<v Speaker 1>value and sometimes it does indicate things better than some

0:21:31.359 --> 0:21:34.439
<v Speaker 1>other more traditional indicators. And of course I think if

0:21:34.440 --> 0:21:36.879
<v Speaker 1>you looked at a lot of Wall Street products and

0:21:36.920 --> 0:21:39.719
<v Speaker 1>ask the social value question, you would have just as

0:21:39.720 --> 0:21:42.280
<v Speaker 1>hard of a time coming up with very true, telling answer.

0:21:42.280 --> 0:21:44.960
<v Speaker 1>All right, well that is this edition of odd LODs.

0:21:45.040 --> 0:21:47.920
<v Speaker 1>Thank you very much for listening. I'm Joe Wisn't though

0:21:47.960 --> 0:21:51.119
<v Speaker 1>you can find me on Twitter at the Stalwart, and

0:21:51.160 --> 0:21:54.480
<v Speaker 1>I'm Tracy Alloway. I'm on Twitter at Tracy Alloway. Thanks

0:21:54.520 --> 0:22:07.120
<v Speaker 1>for listening. Put knowledge to work and grow your business

0:22:07.119 --> 0:22:11.199
<v Speaker 1>with c i T. From transportation to healthcare to manufacturing.

0:22:11.400 --> 0:22:14.800
<v Speaker 1>C i T offers commercial lending, leasing, and treasury management

0:22:14.840 --> 0:22:18.159
<v Speaker 1>services for small and middle market businesses. Learn more at

0:22:18.200 --> 0:22:20.680
<v Speaker 1>c i T dot com. Put Knowledge to Work.