1 00:00:00,960 --> 00:00:02,960 Speaker 1: Hey, this is Buck Sexton and you're listening to the 2 00:00:03,040 --> 00:00:06,160 Speaker 1: Tutor Dixon Podcast, part of the Clay Travers and Buck 3 00:00:06,240 --> 00:00:07,640 Speaker 1: Sexton podcast network. 4 00:00:09,280 --> 00:00:12,240 Speaker 2: Welcome to the Tutor Dixon Podcast. You may have heard 5 00:00:12,320 --> 00:00:16,480 Speaker 2: about this United Auto Workers strike. Well, now Ford has 6 00:00:16,520 --> 00:00:20,079 Speaker 2: decided to halt moving forward with their battery plant. And 7 00:00:20,200 --> 00:00:22,120 Speaker 2: my guest today would tell you this is a good 8 00:00:22,120 --> 00:00:25,080 Speaker 2: thing because of the connection to the Chinese Communist Party. 9 00:00:25,400 --> 00:00:29,280 Speaker 2: Congressman Mike Gallagher, who represents Wisconsin's eighth district and serves 10 00:00:29,320 --> 00:00:32,560 Speaker 2: as chairman of the Select Committee. I'm the Chinese Communist Party, 11 00:00:32,800 --> 00:00:34,680 Speaker 2: joins me today. Welcome Congressman. 12 00:00:34,800 --> 00:00:35,680 Speaker 3: It's great to be with you. 13 00:00:35,960 --> 00:00:38,120 Speaker 2: It's great to have you here in the midst of this. 14 00:00:38,159 --> 00:00:39,880 Speaker 2: I mean, we've been talking about this for a while. 15 00:00:39,960 --> 00:00:44,120 Speaker 2: This is called cattle. It came to Michigan. Even Governor 16 00:00:44,200 --> 00:00:47,040 Speaker 2: Youngkin said I won't have this in Virginia because I 17 00:00:47,040 --> 00:00:49,479 Speaker 2: don't want the connection to the Chinese Communist Party. But 18 00:00:49,760 --> 00:00:52,040 Speaker 2: Gretchen Whitmer, the governor of Michigan, said no, no, we 19 00:00:52,040 --> 00:00:54,240 Speaker 2: welcome them here. We want Ford to be able to 20 00:00:54,280 --> 00:00:58,440 Speaker 2: partner with them. But now this snafu with the auto 21 00:00:58,520 --> 00:01:02,760 Speaker 2: workers strikings, it seems to have cost forward a little 22 00:01:03,440 --> 00:01:06,399 Speaker 2: pause on moving forward with plants in the state of Michigan. 23 00:01:06,400 --> 00:01:07,959 Speaker 2: But you would say this is a good thing. Can 24 00:01:07,959 --> 00:01:10,720 Speaker 2: you explain to us what your concern is with cattle? 25 00:01:11,040 --> 00:01:12,000 Speaker 4: Well quickly. 26 00:01:12,120 --> 00:01:15,800 Speaker 5: I think it's important to understand where cattle emerged from, 27 00:01:15,800 --> 00:01:18,560 Speaker 5: because I think it kind of provides a microcosm into 28 00:01:18,680 --> 00:01:20,680 Speaker 5: our entire fraud. 29 00:01:20,520 --> 00:01:23,600 Speaker 3: Economic relationship with the Chinese Communist Party. 30 00:01:23,680 --> 00:01:25,560 Speaker 4: The original technology. 31 00:01:25,040 --> 00:01:28,440 Speaker 5: Was actually developed in America at the University of Texas 32 00:01:28,480 --> 00:01:30,680 Speaker 5: and then at MIT, and it was a company called 33 00:01:30,720 --> 00:01:35,760 Speaker 5: A one two three that received massive state and federal subsidies. 34 00:01:35,800 --> 00:01:39,400 Speaker 5: The Obama administration gave it millions and millions of dollars, 35 00:01:39,440 --> 00:01:42,000 Speaker 5: and yet it still found its way into bankruptcy. 36 00:01:42,240 --> 00:01:44,800 Speaker 4: You're talking about battery technology, Yeah. 37 00:01:44,720 --> 00:01:49,000 Speaker 5: Battery technology company A one two three, and then Cattle 38 00:01:49,120 --> 00:01:52,559 Speaker 5: purchased the company, and then Cattle, because it has even 39 00:01:52,640 --> 00:01:56,320 Speaker 5: more generous subsidies from the state from the Chinese Communist 40 00:01:56,320 --> 00:01:59,240 Speaker 5: Party about four hundred million dollars in twenty twenty two, 41 00:01:59,760 --> 00:02:03,160 Speaker 5: was able to survive and become really a dominant battery 42 00:02:03,240 --> 00:02:06,400 Speaker 5: company globally. So this kind of tells you everything you 43 00:02:06,440 --> 00:02:09,160 Speaker 5: need to know about what China has done to our economy, 44 00:02:09,200 --> 00:02:12,919 Speaker 5: specifically the industrial Midwest, like states like yours and mine 45 00:02:13,480 --> 00:02:15,640 Speaker 5: over the last two decades, which is because of a 46 00:02:15,680 --> 00:02:20,840 Speaker 5: mix of aggressive practices like intellectual property theft, because of 47 00:02:21,040 --> 00:02:26,200 Speaker 5: subsidies from the state, it's able to compete on an 48 00:02:26,280 --> 00:02:30,040 Speaker 5: unlevel playing field with American companies, steal our best technology 49 00:02:30,400 --> 00:02:31,919 Speaker 5: and then dominate critical. 50 00:02:31,560 --> 00:02:33,079 Speaker 3: Supply chains and critical industries. 51 00:02:33,120 --> 00:02:36,240 Speaker 5: So now fast forward to the present day and the risk, 52 00:02:36,480 --> 00:02:38,320 Speaker 5: and I went to Detroit and I met with Ford, 53 00:02:38,360 --> 00:02:40,440 Speaker 5: and I met with a variety of automakers there to 54 00:02:40,440 --> 00:02:44,640 Speaker 5: express my concern. The risk, in my opinion, is taking 55 00:02:44,680 --> 00:02:48,320 Speaker 5: Cattle's dominant position in the global battery market and making 56 00:02:48,320 --> 00:02:51,880 Speaker 5: it even more dominant. And you have to understand that 57 00:02:51,919 --> 00:02:55,040 Speaker 5: with that dominance, the Chinese Communist Party could weaponize it 58 00:02:55,400 --> 00:02:57,920 Speaker 5: going forward. Imagine if we found ourselves in a confrontation 59 00:02:58,040 --> 00:03:01,480 Speaker 5: with China over Taiwan threatened to cut off the export 60 00:03:01,680 --> 00:03:04,000 Speaker 5: of batteries or shut down certain facilities, it could bring 61 00:03:04,080 --> 00:03:06,360 Speaker 5: us to our knees. They've threatened to do that in 62 00:03:06,400 --> 00:03:09,040 Speaker 5: the early parts of the pandemic with advanced pharmaceutical ingredients. 63 00:03:09,280 --> 00:03:11,640 Speaker 5: So for that and many other reasons, I thought the 64 00:03:11,720 --> 00:03:13,160 Speaker 5: deal was very risky. 65 00:03:13,840 --> 00:03:16,120 Speaker 2: I think that was our big shock when we hit 66 00:03:16,160 --> 00:03:18,920 Speaker 2: the pandemic. All of the things that we are reliant 67 00:03:18,960 --> 00:03:22,320 Speaker 2: on from China, but I think pharmaceuticals were the biggest 68 00:03:22,480 --> 00:03:25,600 Speaker 2: eye opener for people because I come from the manufacturing world, 69 00:03:25,639 --> 00:03:29,560 Speaker 2: so I had seen even US building military vehicles that 70 00:03:29,600 --> 00:03:31,920 Speaker 2: were waiting on a few pieces to come in from China, 71 00:03:32,040 --> 00:03:34,400 Speaker 2: you know, and we're going I mean, eighty percent by 72 00:03:34,440 --> 00:03:36,920 Speaker 2: America is still you can't get one hundred percent of 73 00:03:36,920 --> 00:03:39,920 Speaker 2: a vehicle, you know, this is still pretty scary. But 74 00:03:40,040 --> 00:03:44,400 Speaker 2: then when you actually threaten people's healthcare, everybody takes that 75 00:03:44,480 --> 00:03:46,800 Speaker 2: a little differently. But it seems us as we've gotten 76 00:03:46,840 --> 00:03:49,839 Speaker 2: away from the pandemic, it's sort of the fear of 77 00:03:50,080 --> 00:03:53,080 Speaker 2: not having these capabilities in the United States solely for 78 00:03:53,200 --> 00:03:56,120 Speaker 2: the United States has sort of worn off. But we 79 00:03:56,200 --> 00:03:59,240 Speaker 2: had this happened, this came to Michigan. We had people 80 00:03:59,280 --> 00:04:02,440 Speaker 2: saying that this is a Chinese company. Ford came out 81 00:04:02,480 --> 00:04:04,640 Speaker 2: and said, no, no, we're going to take care of this. 82 00:04:04,680 --> 00:04:07,280 Speaker 2: It's going to be us. I think something you said 83 00:04:07,320 --> 00:04:10,120 Speaker 2: to me was fascinating just now. You said that we 84 00:04:10,360 --> 00:04:13,640 Speaker 2: developed this technology and it went to China. So are 85 00:04:13,640 --> 00:04:17,960 Speaker 2: you saying that the technology of batteries for this type 86 00:04:17,960 --> 00:04:22,200 Speaker 2: of electric vehicle was developed in the United States. But 87 00:04:23,279 --> 00:04:25,160 Speaker 2: we look at this and we see that China has 88 00:04:25,200 --> 00:04:28,400 Speaker 2: complete control over these rare earth minerals, over the process. 89 00:04:28,520 --> 00:04:30,120 Speaker 2: How did we lose that control? 90 00:04:30,640 --> 00:04:35,360 Speaker 5: Well, the story about rare earths is I think really 91 00:04:35,640 --> 00:04:38,320 Speaker 5: a story about stupid regulation in. 92 00:04:38,839 --> 00:04:41,840 Speaker 3: The United States and self defeating regulation. 93 00:04:41,480 --> 00:04:44,640 Speaker 5: Because the rare earths, if you studied the deposits internationally, 94 00:04:45,040 --> 00:04:48,440 Speaker 5: they're not rare. We have enormous deposits of critical minerals 95 00:04:48,520 --> 00:04:51,680 Speaker 5: rare earths. The problem is we've effectively made it illegal 96 00:04:52,040 --> 00:04:53,960 Speaker 5: to mine those deposits. 97 00:04:53,440 --> 00:04:54,839 Speaker 3: And process those deposits. 98 00:04:54,839 --> 00:04:57,600 Speaker 5: We have basically one national champion, a company called MP 99 00:04:57,760 --> 00:05:01,320 Speaker 5: Materials that sits on the California about a border that 100 00:05:01,400 --> 00:05:04,440 Speaker 5: was grandfathered in and thus able to continue to mind. 101 00:05:04,480 --> 00:05:07,479 Speaker 5: They're trying to build a processing facility in Texas, but 102 00:05:07,480 --> 00:05:09,200 Speaker 5: it's extraordinarily difficult. 103 00:05:09,200 --> 00:05:09,920 Speaker 4: In Minnesota. 104 00:05:10,040 --> 00:05:12,040 Speaker 5: We have enormous deposits for a lot of the critical 105 00:05:12,080 --> 00:05:15,560 Speaker 5: minerals we need, but over time we just we built 106 00:05:15,760 --> 00:05:20,839 Speaker 5: an ossified, onerous regulatory environment. There are environmental concerns with 107 00:05:20,960 --> 00:05:24,479 Speaker 5: the processes involved. I get that But the thing I 108 00:05:24,480 --> 00:05:27,680 Speaker 5: think you're even your center Left America needs to understand 109 00:05:28,120 --> 00:05:30,039 Speaker 5: is that we would do it much cleaner in the 110 00:05:30,120 --> 00:05:32,760 Speaker 5: United States than almost anywhere else in the world, and 111 00:05:32,839 --> 00:05:33,799 Speaker 5: certainly in China. 112 00:05:34,040 --> 00:05:36,520 Speaker 2: Well, are aren't they really getting these out of Africa 113 00:05:36,640 --> 00:05:39,359 Speaker 2: using children for labor there? I mean, because that's what 114 00:05:39,360 --> 00:05:42,440 Speaker 2: we're hearing. So maybe I'm telling tales out of school. 115 00:05:42,480 --> 00:05:44,280 Speaker 2: But if that's the case, I feel like this is 116 00:05:44,320 --> 00:05:45,320 Speaker 2: something we should talk about. 117 00:05:45,520 --> 00:05:47,880 Speaker 5: Yeah, well, they're also using If you sort of examine 118 00:05:47,880 --> 00:05:52,560 Speaker 5: the supply chain for solar panel subcomponents and battery subcomponents, 119 00:05:52,600 --> 00:05:54,960 Speaker 5: a lot of it goes back to the Shinjang Autonomous 120 00:05:54,960 --> 00:05:58,640 Speaker 5: Region where there is an ongoing genocide. And that's not 121 00:05:58,720 --> 00:06:01,360 Speaker 5: just my determination, that's the determination of both the Trump 122 00:06:01,400 --> 00:06:05,839 Speaker 5: administration and the Biden administration. And I think at a minimum, 123 00:06:05,839 --> 00:06:08,200 Speaker 5: if a company like Ford is going to do a 124 00:06:08,279 --> 00:06:12,200 Speaker 5: deal using Inflation Reduction Act dollars taxpayer dollars with a 125 00:06:12,240 --> 00:06:15,520 Speaker 5: company like Cattle, they should be forced to answer hard 126 00:06:15,560 --> 00:06:19,200 Speaker 5: questions about Cattle's problematic history when it comes to its 127 00:06:19,240 --> 00:06:23,040 Speaker 5: connection to Shinjang and forced labor in Shinjang Autonomous Region. 128 00:06:23,080 --> 00:06:25,160 Speaker 5: So this is really the irony and tragedy of our 129 00:06:25,360 --> 00:06:29,080 Speaker 5: entire the entire energy policy under the Biden administration, we're 130 00:06:29,120 --> 00:06:32,279 Speaker 5: surrendering what should be one of our greatest advantages relative 131 00:06:32,320 --> 00:06:35,200 Speaker 5: to China right now, which is our energy abundance, and 132 00:06:35,200 --> 00:06:38,680 Speaker 5: we're going to make ourselves more dependent on China for batteries, 133 00:06:38,720 --> 00:06:43,000 Speaker 5: battery subcomponents, and in the process implicate ourselves in egregious 134 00:06:43,040 --> 00:06:46,080 Speaker 5: human rights a bass. This is actually why John Kerry 135 00:06:46,240 --> 00:06:50,000 Speaker 5: was lobbying against the Wiger Force Labor Prevention Act because 136 00:06:50,040 --> 00:06:53,000 Speaker 5: he was afraid that the Weiger Force Labor Prevention Act 137 00:06:53,000 --> 00:06:56,640 Speaker 5: would compromise our ability to get solar paneled subcomponents out 138 00:06:56,640 --> 00:06:58,960 Speaker 5: of Shinjang in China. The whole thing is absurd in 139 00:06:59,000 --> 00:07:02,239 Speaker 5: its self defeating and it's a set of massive geopolitical advantage. 140 00:07:01,960 --> 00:07:07,840 Speaker 2: How actually advantageous are solar panels because suddenly we're hearing 141 00:07:07,960 --> 00:07:10,840 Speaker 2: that there are there's a lot of energy that goes 142 00:07:10,920 --> 00:07:14,120 Speaker 2: into producing them. They actually have chemicals that are running 143 00:07:14,160 --> 00:07:17,240 Speaker 2: off the panels into seeping into the ground. Are any 144 00:07:17,320 --> 00:07:20,200 Speaker 2: of these risks true? Are we just finding this out? 145 00:07:20,440 --> 00:07:23,160 Speaker 2: And are we creating what we're calling clean energy that 146 00:07:23,280 --> 00:07:26,120 Speaker 2: actually once we get into it and we have usage 147 00:07:26,120 --> 00:07:28,280 Speaker 2: for several years, we find out maybe not so clean. 148 00:07:28,840 --> 00:07:29,920 Speaker 4: I think that's a great point. 149 00:07:29,960 --> 00:07:32,920 Speaker 5: I've seen compelling analysis to suggest that if you examine 150 00:07:32,920 --> 00:07:35,240 Speaker 5: the entire sort of life cycle what it takes to 151 00:07:35,320 --> 00:07:38,280 Speaker 5: build not just a battery, but an entire or a 152 00:07:38,320 --> 00:07:42,200 Speaker 5: solar panel, or a battery, an entire electric vehicle, on balance, 153 00:07:42,240 --> 00:07:44,080 Speaker 5: it's not much better, if. 154 00:07:43,920 --> 00:07:46,280 Speaker 3: Better at all, for the environment. 155 00:07:46,360 --> 00:07:48,760 Speaker 5: Took me when you take into account the mining processes 156 00:07:48,800 --> 00:07:51,760 Speaker 5: and some of the other negative externalities. The other question 157 00:07:51,800 --> 00:07:54,560 Speaker 5: I always ask myself, though, let's just consider it a 158 00:07:54,640 --> 00:07:59,920 Speaker 5: fully formed electric vehicle. For example, where does the electric 159 00:08:00,080 --> 00:08:08,040 Speaker 5: city come from? It's largely yeah, exactly, So listen, honestly, 160 00:08:08,080 --> 00:08:11,240 Speaker 5: if someone wants to buy an electric vehicle, that's cool. 161 00:08:11,880 --> 00:08:14,040 Speaker 4: I drove a Tesla once. It was very fun. 162 00:08:15,120 --> 00:08:17,880 Speaker 5: But I just don't think I, as a taxpayer or 163 00:08:17,960 --> 00:08:21,880 Speaker 5: my constituents in Northeast Wisconsin, should be forced to subsidize 164 00:08:21,920 --> 00:08:26,480 Speaker 5: that decision, particularly if there's not clear and convincing evidence 165 00:08:26,800 --> 00:08:29,000 Speaker 5: that it's better for the environment. When it comes to 166 00:08:29,040 --> 00:08:31,840 Speaker 5: the environment, when it comes to climate change, the path 167 00:08:31,840 --> 00:08:33,240 Speaker 5: forward to me is obvious. 168 00:08:33,280 --> 00:08:34,920 Speaker 4: It's to invest in all of the above. 169 00:08:34,960 --> 00:08:39,080 Speaker 5: Policy that has to include nuclear technology. And the fact 170 00:08:39,200 --> 00:08:42,280 Speaker 5: is the left currently will not discuss nuclear technology. But 171 00:08:42,360 --> 00:08:46,520 Speaker 5: right now the Chinese are investing in advanced nuclear microreactor technology. 172 00:08:46,760 --> 00:08:48,240 Speaker 4: And if we don't wake up, we're going to find 173 00:08:48,240 --> 00:08:49,199 Speaker 4: ourselves on the wrong. 174 00:08:49,080 --> 00:08:51,199 Speaker 5: End of that supply chain as well, in the same 175 00:08:51,240 --> 00:08:53,160 Speaker 5: way on the wrong end of the battery supply chain. 176 00:08:53,240 --> 00:08:55,920 Speaker 2: Let's take a quick commercial break. We'll continue next on 177 00:08:55,960 --> 00:09:02,840 Speaker 2: the Tutor Dixon Podcast. We look at what's happening with 178 00:09:02,960 --> 00:09:05,440 Speaker 2: China right now. I think that there are a lot 179 00:09:05,520 --> 00:09:07,839 Speaker 2: of folks who are sounding the alarm. We've heard this 180 00:09:07,920 --> 00:09:11,120 Speaker 2: for several years now that China is really looking to 181 00:09:11,200 --> 00:09:12,079 Speaker 2: take over the world. 182 00:09:12,400 --> 00:09:14,880 Speaker 1: That would start with invading Taiwan. 183 00:09:15,360 --> 00:09:19,160 Speaker 2: What does a war between the US and China over 184 00:09:19,280 --> 00:09:21,240 Speaker 2: an invasion of Taiwan look like? 185 00:09:21,320 --> 00:09:22,960 Speaker 1: Because we've heard people. 186 00:09:22,679 --> 00:09:25,360 Speaker 2: On both sides say, oh, they're not actually going to 187 00:09:25,360 --> 00:09:27,040 Speaker 2: do that, they want at risk that. But I've talked 188 00:09:27,080 --> 00:09:30,480 Speaker 2: to generals who say, you're dealing with a person who 189 00:09:30,520 --> 00:09:33,760 Speaker 2: is truly a dictator. This is someone who will do anything. 190 00:09:34,080 --> 00:09:35,800 Speaker 2: So what are the risks, What are the risks? What 191 00:09:35,840 --> 00:09:36,440 Speaker 2: does it look like? 192 00:09:36,640 --> 00:09:40,560 Speaker 5: Well, first on the tendency for particularly financial elites to 193 00:09:40,640 --> 00:09:42,480 Speaker 5: discount the likelihood of an invasion. 194 00:09:42,559 --> 00:09:43,600 Speaker 4: I think one of the things. 195 00:09:43,480 --> 00:09:46,760 Speaker 5: We learned in Ukraine is that when dictators or are 196 00:09:46,760 --> 00:09:49,160 Speaker 5: people in systems that are different than ours, tell you 197 00:09:49,200 --> 00:09:52,480 Speaker 5: they're going to do somethings, you should probably take it seriously. 198 00:09:53,520 --> 00:09:55,640 Speaker 5: And we just tend to do something called mirror imaging, 199 00:09:55,640 --> 00:09:58,880 Speaker 5: where we graft our own value structure onto other regimes, 200 00:09:58,920 --> 00:10:02,160 Speaker 5: and therefore it seems unthinkable. Oh, of course US in 201 00:10:02,240 --> 00:10:05,600 Speaker 5: Ping would never invade Taiwan. It would be incredibly difficult 202 00:10:05,600 --> 00:10:08,360 Speaker 5: and incredibly costly. But particularly when you're dealing with a 203 00:10:08,400 --> 00:10:10,680 Speaker 5: Marxist Leninist regime where there's just not a lot of 204 00:10:10,760 --> 00:10:13,800 Speaker 5: robust feedback loops, he could decide to do something for 205 00:10:13,880 --> 00:10:17,120 Speaker 5: reasons that seemed irrational to us, but could seem entirely 206 00:10:17,200 --> 00:10:21,160 Speaker 5: rational for his primary goal, which is regime and party preservation. 207 00:10:21,600 --> 00:10:25,240 Speaker 5: What it would look like, in short, it would be horrific. 208 00:10:26,040 --> 00:10:29,880 Speaker 5: We fought wars in Afghanistan in Iraq for two decades. 209 00:10:30,320 --> 00:10:34,680 Speaker 5: One aircraft carrier is sunk in a war with China 210 00:10:34,679 --> 00:10:38,040 Speaker 5: over Taiwan, and it would almost equal the casualties. 211 00:10:37,520 --> 00:10:38,880 Speaker 3: Over twenty years of war in Iraq. 212 00:10:38,920 --> 00:10:42,480 Speaker 5: In Afghanistan, the financial implications would be severe. 213 00:10:42,480 --> 00:10:43,319 Speaker 4: We just did a wargame. 214 00:10:43,360 --> 00:10:45,600 Speaker 5: I took the Select Committee on the CCP to New 215 00:10:45,679 --> 00:10:48,520 Speaker 5: York and we did a wargame with major financial elites, 216 00:10:48,679 --> 00:10:52,040 Speaker 5: and you're talking trillions of dollars lost, even in the 217 00:10:52,080 --> 00:10:55,600 Speaker 5: lowest end scenario like a blockade. So the punchline for 218 00:10:55,640 --> 00:10:58,480 Speaker 5: all of this is that given the risks, given the costs, 219 00:10:58,520 --> 00:11:01,199 Speaker 5: and given the potential that it could esc beyond conventional 220 00:11:01,200 --> 00:11:04,400 Speaker 5: war into nuclear war like we're talking World War III, 221 00:11:04,760 --> 00:11:07,679 Speaker 5: we should be moving heaven and earth to prevent the war. 222 00:11:08,160 --> 00:11:11,439 Speaker 5: In the first place, we need to put in place 223 00:11:11,520 --> 00:11:15,880 Speaker 5: a deterrence by denial posture such that Xi Jinping concludes 224 00:11:16,200 --> 00:11:20,000 Speaker 5: that he cannot achieve his lifelong ambition and reunifying Taiwan, 225 00:11:20,040 --> 00:11:23,680 Speaker 5: as he calls it, with the mainland is his lifelong objective. 226 00:11:23,720 --> 00:11:27,240 Speaker 5: But right now the Pentagon's moving too slow. We're just 227 00:11:27,320 --> 00:11:31,040 Speaker 5: not We're not even rebuilding some of the critical munitions 228 00:11:31,040 --> 00:11:34,120 Speaker 5: that we're expending in Ukraine, munitions that would be relevant 229 00:11:34,120 --> 00:11:36,280 Speaker 5: in Taiwan. And that's what really worries me. The balance 230 00:11:36,320 --> 00:11:39,520 Speaker 5: of power continues to trend less in our favor, in 231 00:11:39,600 --> 00:11:41,280 Speaker 5: more of the favor of the CCP. The final thing 232 00:11:41,320 --> 00:11:43,080 Speaker 5: I'm saying, and I'll sorry, I'm sorry to go on, 233 00:11:43,760 --> 00:11:45,920 Speaker 5: is what we're seeing in China right now with the 234 00:11:45,920 --> 00:11:50,000 Speaker 5: People's Liberation Army is really the biggest military build up 235 00:11:50,640 --> 00:11:53,520 Speaker 5: in peacetime military build up at least since World War Two. 236 00:11:53,600 --> 00:11:55,240 Speaker 1: Right, The largest navy in the world. 237 00:11:55,040 --> 00:11:57,439 Speaker 4: Is something, and not even that you're you're totally right. 238 00:11:57,480 --> 00:11:59,600 Speaker 5: It's bigger than ours by forty one hulls, and so 239 00:11:59,640 --> 00:12:02,920 Speaker 5: the navy nerds and I'm technically naval officer marine, so 240 00:12:02,920 --> 00:12:05,600 Speaker 5: I can call them nerds, We'll say, but our ships 241 00:12:05,600 --> 00:12:09,520 Speaker 5: are more capable. Well, at some point, quantity has a 242 00:12:09,600 --> 00:12:11,960 Speaker 5: quality all of its own, and their most advanced ships 243 00:12:11,960 --> 00:12:14,200 Speaker 5: are quite capable. And it's actually they have the three 244 00:12:14,280 --> 00:12:16,600 Speaker 5: largest navies in the world if you factor in their 245 00:12:16,640 --> 00:12:19,400 Speaker 5: coastguard and their maritime militia, both of which would be 246 00:12:19,480 --> 00:12:22,040 Speaker 5: relevant to an invasion of Taiwan. So it's incredibly troubling, 247 00:12:22,320 --> 00:12:24,240 Speaker 5: which is why we need to We need to invest 248 00:12:24,240 --> 00:12:27,760 Speaker 5: in a more lethal and capable military before it's too late. 249 00:12:27,920 --> 00:12:28,640 Speaker 1: Let me ask you this. 250 00:12:28,679 --> 00:12:31,480 Speaker 2: So we were speaking to some folks in the know, 251 00:12:31,679 --> 00:12:36,280 Speaker 2: and they say that Joe Biden had committed or the 252 00:12:36,320 --> 00:12:40,320 Speaker 2: Taiwan had actually purchased jets from US. The purchase went through. 253 00:12:40,480 --> 00:12:43,520 Speaker 2: We have the money, we were supposed to deliver the jets. 254 00:12:43,800 --> 00:12:47,080 Speaker 2: Joe Biden can put them on hold without getting approval 255 00:12:47,440 --> 00:12:50,640 Speaker 2: from Congress. He can't cancel the order. But now these 256 00:12:50,720 --> 00:12:53,080 Speaker 2: jets have been on hold for three years. We don't 257 00:12:53,120 --> 00:12:56,080 Speaker 2: actually know what's happening. Did they go to Ukraine? Is 258 00:12:56,240 --> 00:13:01,440 Speaker 2: sending munitions and weapons over to Ukraine? Depleting us in 259 00:13:01,480 --> 00:13:04,439 Speaker 2: a way that it makes us vulnerable for China going 260 00:13:04,480 --> 00:13:07,640 Speaker 2: into Taiwan. What does all of this mean when you 261 00:13:07,679 --> 00:13:10,520 Speaker 2: see that Joe Biden is going against Congress holding jets 262 00:13:10,559 --> 00:13:12,360 Speaker 2: and nobody seems to know about this. 263 00:13:12,960 --> 00:13:15,679 Speaker 5: Well, I think it reveals something obvious, which is our 264 00:13:15,840 --> 00:13:19,000 Speaker 5: entire foreign military sales process is broken. 265 00:13:18,920 --> 00:13:19,640 Speaker 4: Beyond the jets. 266 00:13:19,640 --> 00:13:23,520 Speaker 5: Look at since twenty fifteen, we've developed a nearly twenty 267 00:13:23,640 --> 00:13:28,240 Speaker 5: billion dollar backlog of items that have been approved and 268 00:13:28,400 --> 00:13:32,480 Speaker 5: purchased by Taiwan but not delivered. And quite honestly, what's 269 00:13:32,480 --> 00:13:35,160 Speaker 5: even more important than jets? I mean twenty billion dollars. 270 00:13:35,200 --> 00:13:37,360 Speaker 5: I mean some of these go back to twenty fifteen 271 00:13:38,040 --> 00:13:40,480 Speaker 5: for anti ship missiles, which I would argue are even 272 00:13:40,559 --> 00:13:44,720 Speaker 5: more relevant to deterring a Chinese invasion of Taiwan than 273 00:13:44,840 --> 00:13:46,880 Speaker 5: fancy jets that sit on a runway and might get 274 00:13:46,880 --> 00:13:49,760 Speaker 5: blown up in the first hours of a war. Anti 275 00:13:49,760 --> 00:13:53,080 Speaker 5: ship missiles, harpoon anti ship missiles, some of these aren't 276 00:13:53,080 --> 00:13:55,800 Speaker 5: going to arrive until twenty twenty seven. That's going to 277 00:13:55,880 --> 00:13:59,360 Speaker 5: be too late. It's crazy the backlog that has been delivered. 278 00:13:59,400 --> 00:14:02,480 Speaker 5: We have heart poons in our own stockpiles that we're 279 00:14:02,480 --> 00:14:04,160 Speaker 5: going to put into deep storage. 280 00:14:04,400 --> 00:14:05,360 Speaker 3: It's called d milling. 281 00:14:05,400 --> 00:14:08,480 Speaker 5: We pay money in order to kind of deactivate them 282 00:14:08,480 --> 00:14:10,720 Speaker 5: when we put them into a storage shed somewhere. 283 00:14:10,760 --> 00:14:12,920 Speaker 3: I'm simplifying, but that's effectively what happens. 284 00:14:13,600 --> 00:14:16,760 Speaker 5: We could take those, we could maguiver them for lack 285 00:14:16,800 --> 00:14:19,680 Speaker 5: of a better term, and deliver those to Taiwan. All 286 00:14:19,720 --> 00:14:23,320 Speaker 5: it takes is a little bit of creativity and leadership 287 00:14:23,360 --> 00:14:26,400 Speaker 5: from the Department of Defense. Ask for the question between 288 00:14:26,520 --> 00:14:30,120 Speaker 5: Ukraine and Taiwan. In certain systems, Yes, they're needed in 289 00:14:30,120 --> 00:14:33,120 Speaker 5: both Ukraine and Taiwan, but harpoons, for example, are more 290 00:14:33,160 --> 00:14:36,000 Speaker 5: relevant in Taiwan than Ukraine. However, if we don't, as 291 00:14:36,040 --> 00:14:39,080 Speaker 5: I alluded to before, learn the lesson of Ukraine in 292 00:14:39,160 --> 00:14:44,720 Speaker 5: order to rebuild our stockpiles of critical missiles, critical munitions, 293 00:14:45,120 --> 00:14:47,680 Speaker 5: then we're going to be in a very difficult situation 294 00:14:48,040 --> 00:14:51,920 Speaker 5: in both Taiwan and Ukraine, because that's the lesson. Really, 295 00:14:52,400 --> 00:14:55,360 Speaker 5: we went through so many of these munitions early in 296 00:14:55,400 --> 00:14:57,800 Speaker 5: the war in Ukraine because for years we just don't 297 00:14:58,120 --> 00:15:00,760 Speaker 5: These are less sexy items that not to get the 298 00:15:00,800 --> 00:15:03,400 Speaker 5: same attention as a fancy jet, and so they don't 299 00:15:03,400 --> 00:15:06,160 Speaker 5: get the budget priority. But really, for a modest investment 300 00:15:06,200 --> 00:15:08,680 Speaker 5: of money relative to the overall Pentagon budget, we're talking 301 00:15:08,720 --> 00:15:11,640 Speaker 5: ten billion dollars a year, you could rebuild our arsenal 302 00:15:11,640 --> 00:15:14,720 Speaker 5: of deterrence and in the process give us a better. 303 00:15:14,600 --> 00:15:16,400 Speaker 3: Chance of avoiding a war in the first place. 304 00:15:16,800 --> 00:15:19,520 Speaker 2: Let's take a quick commercial break. We'll continue next on 305 00:15:19,560 --> 00:15:26,520 Speaker 2: the Tutor Dixon Podcast. We've heard a few different theories 306 00:15:26,560 --> 00:15:28,760 Speaker 2: on Ukraine. Of course, we have the folks that say 307 00:15:28,800 --> 00:15:31,640 Speaker 2: we shouldn't do anything in Ukraine at all. We should 308 00:15:31,800 --> 00:15:34,120 Speaker 2: they this is their fight, we shouldn't get involved in it. 309 00:15:34,160 --> 00:15:36,360 Speaker 2: We have folks who are saying, I mean, Nikki Haley 310 00:15:36,400 --> 00:15:38,560 Speaker 2: has come out and said I would never give money 311 00:15:38,560 --> 00:15:40,520 Speaker 2: to Ukraine, but I would give them weapons, and I 312 00:15:40,560 --> 00:15:42,640 Speaker 2: would give them what they need to fight a war. 313 00:15:42,920 --> 00:15:44,600 Speaker 2: And then you have other folks who are saying, just 314 00:15:44,640 --> 00:15:46,680 Speaker 2: continue to push the money through, push the money through, 315 00:15:46,720 --> 00:15:49,880 Speaker 2: push the money through. And some people feel like that's untraceable. 316 00:15:49,880 --> 00:15:52,760 Speaker 2: We don't really know what's happening. Our taxpayer dollars are 317 00:15:52,760 --> 00:15:55,640 Speaker 2: going over there. We don't really know what's happening. When 318 00:15:55,680 --> 00:15:58,920 Speaker 2: you look at the situation with Ukraine, certainly it is 319 00:15:59,120 --> 00:16:01,560 Speaker 2: a voll little situation. They get through Ukraine, they go 320 00:16:01,600 --> 00:16:04,720 Speaker 2: to Poland, and we know that Putin has been talking 321 00:16:04,760 --> 00:16:08,960 Speaker 2: to Jijiping, we know they've been talking to North Korea. 322 00:16:09,320 --> 00:16:12,720 Speaker 2: You get a ran China, North Korea, and Russia together. 323 00:16:13,120 --> 00:16:17,800 Speaker 2: That's a pretty dangerous combination. So how serious is the 324 00:16:17,920 --> 00:16:21,320 Speaker 2: situation in Ukraine and what should the American people be 325 00:16:21,400 --> 00:16:24,000 Speaker 2: thinking when it comes to supporting Ukraine. 326 00:16:24,120 --> 00:16:25,040 Speaker 4: It's very serious. 327 00:16:25,800 --> 00:16:28,640 Speaker 5: It could still escalate in ways that we should be 328 00:16:29,200 --> 00:16:34,360 Speaker 5: cognizant of. I understand the skepticism in the Republican Party 329 00:16:34,400 --> 00:16:37,200 Speaker 5: when it comes to Ukraine, and I don't dismiss it, 330 00:16:37,440 --> 00:16:38,920 Speaker 5: and a lot of it I think comes from the 331 00:16:38,920 --> 00:16:40,360 Speaker 5: Democratic Well two things. 332 00:16:40,360 --> 00:16:42,360 Speaker 4: I think the absence of. 333 00:16:42,320 --> 00:16:45,920 Speaker 5: A coherent plan from the Biden administration or the inability 334 00:16:45,920 --> 00:16:49,240 Speaker 5: of the President himself to articulate what the end state is, 335 00:16:49,440 --> 00:16:51,560 Speaker 5: which is not great, and in fact, at the same 336 00:16:51,600 --> 00:16:54,200 Speaker 5: time they're blaming Republicans for holding up Ukraine funding. 337 00:16:54,640 --> 00:16:57,520 Speaker 4: They went to the G twenty and released a water down. 338 00:16:57,360 --> 00:17:00,200 Speaker 5: Statement that was basically a gift to Russia's So that 339 00:17:00,200 --> 00:17:05,399 Speaker 5: doesn't do a lot to generate support for continued Ukraine funding. 340 00:17:05,440 --> 00:17:08,679 Speaker 5: So I understand that skepticism, and I would say, no 341 00:17:08,680 --> 00:17:11,160 Speaker 5: one should get a blank check, right Our own military 342 00:17:11,200 --> 00:17:12,240 Speaker 5: doesn't get a blank check. 343 00:17:12,640 --> 00:17:14,880 Speaker 4: The Ukraine's military, it doesn't get. 344 00:17:14,760 --> 00:17:15,280 Speaker 3: A blank check. 345 00:17:15,359 --> 00:17:17,160 Speaker 5: My wife doesn't get a blank Well, my wife gets 346 00:17:17,160 --> 00:17:21,520 Speaker 5: a blank check. But other than that, nobody like, yeah, yeah, exactly, 347 00:17:22,320 --> 00:17:25,280 Speaker 5: scratch that for the record, yeah exactly. 348 00:17:28,480 --> 00:17:31,359 Speaker 4: But so there needs to be robust oversight. 349 00:17:31,480 --> 00:17:33,600 Speaker 5: We need to have a full accounting of all the 350 00:17:33,640 --> 00:17:36,560 Speaker 5: weapons we provided thus far in a sense that they're 351 00:17:36,600 --> 00:17:40,480 Speaker 5: being used well and responsibly, and then we can consider future. 352 00:17:40,119 --> 00:17:41,920 Speaker 3: Packages of clinical assistance. 353 00:17:42,280 --> 00:17:43,920 Speaker 5: The second thing I would say is I do think 354 00:17:43,960 --> 00:17:48,399 Speaker 5: it's fair for us to encourage, indeed demand, that certain 355 00:17:48,400 --> 00:17:52,520 Speaker 5: European countries, particularly the Western European countries, step up and 356 00:17:52,560 --> 00:17:55,320 Speaker 5: if they're uncomfortable in terms of providing weapons, they can 357 00:17:55,359 --> 00:17:59,240 Speaker 5: fill the gap when it comes to humanitarian assistance, and 358 00:17:59,560 --> 00:18:02,200 Speaker 5: you know they can pay the teacher pensions in Ukraine 359 00:18:02,240 --> 00:18:05,320 Speaker 5: while we provide the weapons. The third point is most important, 360 00:18:05,520 --> 00:18:07,280 Speaker 5: I think, which is what I alluded to before, which 361 00:18:07,320 --> 00:18:10,159 Speaker 5: is that this should be an opportunity for us to 362 00:18:10,280 --> 00:18:14,680 Speaker 5: fix the deficiencies in our own munitions and industrial base, 363 00:18:14,760 --> 00:18:17,600 Speaker 5: our defense industrial base, so that we are in a 364 00:18:17,600 --> 00:18:20,760 Speaker 5: better position to deter a war in other theaters. When 365 00:18:20,760 --> 00:18:23,040 Speaker 5: it comes to the connection between Taiwan and Ukraine, yes, 366 00:18:23,080 --> 00:18:24,919 Speaker 5: I do believe that we have to take this no 367 00:18:25,040 --> 00:18:29,840 Speaker 5: limits partnership between She and Putin seriously. The one thing, however, 368 00:18:30,080 --> 00:18:33,720 Speaker 5: that makes our our that makes it impossible for us 369 00:18:34,119 --> 00:18:38,560 Speaker 5: to execute our war plans with respect to Taiwan is 370 00:18:38,600 --> 00:18:42,760 Speaker 5: if Russia launched a simultaneous attack against NATO. And right 371 00:18:42,760 --> 00:18:45,439 Speaker 5: now I believe we've degraded the Russian military in Ukraine 372 00:18:45,520 --> 00:18:49,640 Speaker 5: such that they're conventional military threat to NATO is non existent. 373 00:18:49,720 --> 00:18:52,359 Speaker 5: So I actually believe that if we can shape the 374 00:18:52,480 --> 00:18:58,119 Speaker 5: outcome in Ukraine in a way that protects the integrity 375 00:18:58,160 --> 00:19:00,359 Speaker 5: of Ukraine. Obviously, I don't think Crimea is going back 376 00:19:00,359 --> 00:19:02,840 Speaker 5: to U Grane ay time soon, and also induces panic 377 00:19:02,880 --> 00:19:06,320 Speaker 5: in Beijing, we can actually enhance our geopolitical position. I 378 00:19:06,320 --> 00:19:08,679 Speaker 5: get that it's a difficult balance to strike with us 379 00:19:08,720 --> 00:19:09,920 Speaker 5: the nature of geopolitics. 380 00:19:10,359 --> 00:19:12,240 Speaker 2: Do you think that the rest of the world thinks 381 00:19:12,280 --> 00:19:14,680 Speaker 2: that a Joe Biden is capable of this? I mean, 382 00:19:14,680 --> 00:19:16,800 Speaker 2: we see him at the G twenty saying that he 383 00:19:16,880 --> 00:19:20,760 Speaker 2: needs to go to bed. We see him fumbling names constantly. 384 00:19:20,840 --> 00:19:24,800 Speaker 2: He doesn't seem to be in command. He's walking with 385 00:19:25,000 --> 00:19:30,440 Speaker 2: a Zelenski through the Rose Garden and Zelensky is dressed down. 386 00:19:30,680 --> 00:19:33,439 Speaker 2: It seems very much like we are being controlled by 387 00:19:33,480 --> 00:19:36,520 Speaker 2: other people. I would say most people are feeling like that. 388 00:19:36,760 --> 00:19:38,840 Speaker 2: But what is your sense on the world stage. 389 00:19:39,000 --> 00:19:42,560 Speaker 5: I hate to be maybe rude or uncharitable to the 390 00:19:42,560 --> 00:19:45,280 Speaker 5: commander in chief, but I mean Biden he's just too old. 391 00:19:45,880 --> 00:19:48,320 Speaker 5: I mean, he's just clearly lost a step. And what 392 00:19:48,359 --> 00:19:51,880 Speaker 5: we saw in Vietnam I think further proved that point. 393 00:19:51,920 --> 00:19:54,720 Speaker 5: And so I do think it undermines the credibility of 394 00:19:54,760 --> 00:19:57,800 Speaker 5: our deterrent posture when you have a commander in chief 395 00:19:58,040 --> 00:20:01,440 Speaker 5: that says contradictory thing. For example, what he said in 396 00:20:01,520 --> 00:20:04,360 Speaker 5: Vietnam was troubling. I mean, he went out there and said, well, 397 00:20:04,400 --> 00:20:08,200 Speaker 5: don't worry about China. China has economic problems and therefore 398 00:20:08,240 --> 00:20:10,120 Speaker 5: it's less likely they're going to invade Taiwan. 399 00:20:10,880 --> 00:20:13,520 Speaker 1: Okay said he'd like to see them succeed. 400 00:20:13,760 --> 00:20:16,760 Speaker 5: I'm like, yeah, yeah, what signal does that send to 401 00:20:16,760 --> 00:20:18,879 Speaker 5: our allies? What signal does this send to our allies 402 00:20:18,920 --> 00:20:23,240 Speaker 5: in Asia in particular? But honestly, like the reverse could 403 00:20:23,320 --> 00:20:28,960 Speaker 5: be true. As China experiences domestic economic and demographic problems, 404 00:20:29,520 --> 00:20:32,679 Speaker 5: they could get more aggressive on the world stage. Rights 405 00:20:32,760 --> 00:20:35,960 Speaker 5: It's called diversionary war theory. So for the presidents go 406 00:20:35,960 --> 00:20:39,520 Speaker 5: out there and say that really undermines our deterrent posture. 407 00:20:39,680 --> 00:20:43,679 Speaker 5: And Biden I did the math on this recently. I 408 00:20:43,720 --> 00:20:46,360 Speaker 5: believe Biden is so old that he's not even a boomer. 409 00:20:46,520 --> 00:20:49,040 Speaker 5: I think he's a member of the silent generation. In fact, 410 00:20:49,160 --> 00:20:52,760 Speaker 5: Biden is older than the People's Republic of China itself, 411 00:20:52,840 --> 00:20:55,120 Speaker 5: which was established in nineteen forty nine, and I think 412 00:20:55,160 --> 00:20:58,360 Speaker 5: Biden was established in nineteen forty nineteen forty two. 413 00:20:58,440 --> 00:20:59,720 Speaker 4: So I'm biased. 414 00:20:59,720 --> 00:21:02,440 Speaker 5: I get us as a relatively younger member of Congress, 415 00:21:02,440 --> 00:21:02,960 Speaker 5: but I'd like. 416 00:21:02,920 --> 00:21:04,200 Speaker 3: To see a generational shift. 417 00:21:04,240 --> 00:21:08,160 Speaker 5: And one final point, I'm sorry, go on, really, maybe 418 00:21:08,280 --> 00:21:13,880 Speaker 5: A more fair criticism is that the Biden administration's revival 419 00:21:14,320 --> 00:21:19,040 Speaker 5: of diplomatic and economic engagement with China as really the 420 00:21:19,080 --> 00:21:24,320 Speaker 5: foundation of our foreign policy is naive. It's misguided, it's counterproductive. 421 00:21:25,000 --> 00:21:27,680 Speaker 5: We've had four Cabinet secretaries go to Beijing in the 422 00:21:27,720 --> 00:21:29,520 Speaker 5: last few months. We have nothing to show for it. 423 00:21:29,520 --> 00:21:32,600 Speaker 5: All we've done is slow the defense of action we 424 00:21:32,640 --> 00:21:36,440 Speaker 5: need to take to defend ourselves against Chinese Communist Party aggression. 425 00:21:36,440 --> 00:21:39,720 Speaker 5: And so that policy choice honestly worries me even more. 426 00:21:40,040 --> 00:21:42,640 Speaker 2: You know, I always find it fascinating to see all 427 00:21:42,680 --> 00:21:45,280 Speaker 2: of these people come out and defend China. And obviously 428 00:21:45,280 --> 00:21:47,960 Speaker 2: we've been talking about cattle here in Michigan. We've also 429 00:21:48,000 --> 00:21:51,320 Speaker 2: been talking about Goshen in Michigan, and so we've hit 430 00:21:51,359 --> 00:21:55,159 Speaker 2: pretty hard on having CCP operatives in our state. I 431 00:21:55,240 --> 00:21:59,119 Speaker 2: do not want the Chinese Communist Party in one of 432 00:21:59,160 --> 00:22:02,240 Speaker 2: our states that has our highest resource of water, right, 433 00:22:02,359 --> 00:22:04,359 Speaker 2: I just don't want that. But I don't want them 434 00:22:04,400 --> 00:22:06,840 Speaker 2: in our state regardless, and so we've gotten a lot 435 00:22:06,880 --> 00:22:09,960 Speaker 2: of criticism for that. But it shocks me that we 436 00:22:10,000 --> 00:22:13,320 Speaker 2: don't have people like Lebron James and these bleeding heart 437 00:22:13,359 --> 00:22:16,720 Speaker 2: liberals coming out and saying, how could you possibly get 438 00:22:16,760 --> 00:22:20,119 Speaker 2: in bed with a country that commits the human rights 439 00:22:20,119 --> 00:22:23,000 Speaker 2: offenses that happen in China. I mean, even if you 440 00:22:23,040 --> 00:22:26,200 Speaker 2: were a little naive to what they do and it's ugly, 441 00:22:26,480 --> 00:22:28,320 Speaker 2: but even if you were a naive to the child 442 00:22:28,440 --> 00:22:29,680 Speaker 2: labor and everything else. 443 00:22:29,480 --> 00:22:31,359 Speaker 1: You saw what happened in COVID. 444 00:22:31,400 --> 00:22:33,240 Speaker 2: I mean, we all have those images in our minds 445 00:22:33,280 --> 00:22:35,200 Speaker 2: of people being stuffed on the side of the road 446 00:22:35,480 --> 00:22:37,760 Speaker 2: with the guys in the full white outfits, and. 447 00:22:37,720 --> 00:22:40,359 Speaker 1: They're like, what happened to that person that gets thrown 448 00:22:40,400 --> 00:22:42,560 Speaker 1: in the back of a van? And you're like, I mean. 449 00:22:42,840 --> 00:22:46,080 Speaker 2: It's not funny, it's we really don't know what they 450 00:22:46,119 --> 00:22:49,040 Speaker 2: did to people who had COVID, and no one is 451 00:22:49,119 --> 00:22:52,119 Speaker 2: willing to actually dig deep into that. So I just 452 00:22:52,119 --> 00:22:54,680 Speaker 2: think I appreciate what you do every day. I appreciate 453 00:22:54,760 --> 00:22:57,280 Speaker 2: the fact that you talk truth to what's happening with 454 00:22:57,359 --> 00:23:00,840 Speaker 2: the Chinese Communist Party and the dangers the United States 455 00:23:00,840 --> 00:23:03,040 Speaker 2: of America, and honestly that you are willing to come 456 00:23:03,040 --> 00:23:06,240 Speaker 2: out and speak truth about what's happening in the White House. 457 00:23:06,280 --> 00:23:08,080 Speaker 2: So I thank you, thank you for being on the 458 00:23:08,119 --> 00:23:11,359 Speaker 2: podcast here today. Congressman Gallagher. We're going to catch up 459 00:23:11,359 --> 00:23:13,240 Speaker 2: with you again because I know more is going to 460 00:23:13,280 --> 00:23:16,080 Speaker 2: happen with these Chinese plants that are coming into the country. 461 00:23:16,520 --> 00:23:18,480 Speaker 4: Well, it was a real pleasure to be with you. 462 00:23:19,200 --> 00:23:22,359 Speaker 5: I don't often say nice things about Michiganders, and I 463 00:23:22,400 --> 00:23:27,359 Speaker 5: have to remind you that Michigan stole the Upper Peninsula 464 00:23:27,480 --> 00:23:31,440 Speaker 5: from Wisconsin. There was a war between Michigan and Ohio 465 00:23:31,480 --> 00:23:33,520 Speaker 5: over Toledo, and Congress sold it. 466 00:23:33,720 --> 00:23:35,880 Speaker 2: Andrew Jackson, I was going to say, well, what did 467 00:23:35,920 --> 00:23:37,080 Speaker 2: you think we wanted Toledo? 468 00:23:37,440 --> 00:23:41,920 Speaker 5: Yeah, exactly, but we got robbed of territory that should 469 00:23:41,960 --> 00:23:45,040 Speaker 5: be Wisconsin territory. So I've made it my life's ambition 470 00:23:45,200 --> 00:23:47,359 Speaker 5: to take it back. That's my actual objective. 471 00:23:48,880 --> 00:23:52,840 Speaker 2: But there is a bit of a war still between 472 00:23:52,840 --> 00:23:55,399 Speaker 2: Ohio and Michigan. Not sure if you've heard it, but 473 00:23:55,560 --> 00:23:56,760 Speaker 2: it continues today. 474 00:23:57,800 --> 00:23:59,000 Speaker 4: Well, thank you so much for that. 475 00:23:59,080 --> 00:24:01,720 Speaker 2: Might be just on football teas, but yes, thank you 476 00:24:01,760 --> 00:24:03,840 Speaker 2: and thank you all for joining us on the Tutor 477 00:24:03,880 --> 00:24:07,200 Speaker 2: Dixon Podcast. For this episode and others, check out Tutordison 478 00:24:07,280 --> 00:24:11,080 Speaker 2: podcast dot com or go to the iHeartRadio app, Apple Podcasts, 479 00:24:11,160 --> 00:24:13,520 Speaker 2: or wherever you get your podcasts and join us next time, 480 00:24:13,640 --> 00:24:14,359 Speaker 2: have a blessed ding