WEBVTT - 4/15, Part 1: Modica Monday, recapping a MASTERFUL Weekend, MLB recap, and more...

0:00:00.560 --> 0:00:03.640
<v Speaker 1>Hey, thanks for downloading the podcast, and remember, if you

0:00:03.680 --> 0:00:07.160
<v Speaker 1>want to listen live, download the I Heart Radio app,

0:00:07.240 --> 0:00:10.080
<v Speaker 1>download the tune and app and just search for Fantasy

0:00:10.240 --> 0:00:14.760
<v Speaker 1>Sports Radio Network and you could listen to this program live. Also,

0:00:14.920 --> 0:00:17.360
<v Speaker 1>if you want to watch the video of this podcast,

0:00:17.600 --> 0:00:21.000
<v Speaker 1>check us out on YouTube, on twitch, or on Periscope

0:00:21.120 --> 0:00:24.840
<v Speaker 1>and type in you guest did Fantasy Sports Network. You'll

0:00:24.880 --> 0:00:28.200
<v Speaker 1>find us there. Enjoy the show and thanks for listening.

0:00:30.200 --> 0:00:38.760
<v Speaker 1>You're listening to the Fantasy Sports Radio Network Fantasy best

0:00:38.760 --> 0:00:59.440
<v Speaker 1>Friends Forever. Yeah, this as the Fantasy best Friends Forever.

0:00:59.680 --> 0:01:03.000
<v Speaker 1>Here the Fantasy Sports Radio Network alongside Frank Stample. I

0:01:03.080 --> 0:01:07.480
<v Speaker 1>am Greg. He's going, Frankie. Hear the music playing. You

0:01:07.520 --> 0:01:11.679
<v Speaker 1>can only mean one thing. Winter is here, Greggy. Big

0:01:11.680 --> 0:01:16.040
<v Speaker 1>Game of Thrones premiere last night. I enjoyed it. Thoroughly

0:01:16.200 --> 0:01:18.960
<v Speaker 1>nice little rink labor from from Chris Pavona. We didn't

0:01:18.959 --> 0:01:20.200
<v Speaker 1>know that was I like, what things that we don't

0:01:20.200 --> 0:01:22.720
<v Speaker 1>know what's coming happens like that. I enjoyed that. Good,

0:01:22.720 --> 0:01:25.560
<v Speaker 1>good times, good times. Great weekend. Just in terms of

0:01:26.000 --> 0:01:28.560
<v Speaker 1>a great weekend, everything that was happening of the NBA

0:01:28.640 --> 0:01:32.319
<v Speaker 1>Playoffs UFC I watched Saturday was really really good as well.

0:01:32.959 --> 0:01:35.680
<v Speaker 1>Um actually did have to get my passport renewed, which

0:01:35.680 --> 0:01:37.679
<v Speaker 1>took four hours in a post office. Greg. That was

0:01:37.760 --> 0:01:40.840
<v Speaker 1>not a highlight of my weekend. But then Game of

0:01:40.880 --> 0:01:45.600
<v Speaker 1>Thrones baseball, I'm sure the Yankees sucking pleases Met Modica,

0:01:45.800 --> 0:01:47.960
<v Speaker 1>who's gonna be joining us? But outside of that, I

0:01:48.000 --> 0:01:50.720
<v Speaker 1>mean the great weekend. You literally skipped the thing that

0:01:50.760 --> 0:01:54.440
<v Speaker 1>I did for ten hours this weekend. What did you do?

0:01:54.680 --> 0:01:57.600
<v Speaker 1>Watch The Masters? Man? That was literally the number one

0:01:57.680 --> 0:02:02.000
<v Speaker 1>thing all weekend. Tiger Woods, Dude, that was with the

0:02:02.000 --> 0:02:05.720
<v Speaker 1>story of the weekend UFC. Everyone is excited about it, rightfully,

0:02:05.760 --> 0:02:08.560
<v Speaker 1>so like what it was awesome? I look, I just

0:02:08.639 --> 0:02:11.000
<v Speaker 1>I don't have much interest in gol Oh my god, man,

0:02:11.040 --> 0:02:14.000
<v Speaker 1>I watched literally from beginnings and nine thirty to two

0:02:14.160 --> 0:02:17.160
<v Speaker 1>thirty on Sunday. I woke up right for it, sat

0:02:17.200 --> 0:02:19.480
<v Speaker 1>in front of the couch, barely moved, and then Saturday

0:02:19.600 --> 0:02:22.519
<v Speaker 1>turned it on at like three o'clock. Oh my god.

0:02:22.560 --> 0:02:26.359
<v Speaker 1>It was perfect, the perfect, perfect weekend, so public to

0:02:26.360 --> 0:02:28.720
<v Speaker 1>watch the Masters. It was amazing. Watch a little baseball,

0:02:29.160 --> 0:02:32.440
<v Speaker 1>uh earlier, later watched the pill the Sixers, and the Nets.

0:02:32.639 --> 0:02:36.560
<v Speaker 1>It was an amazing sports weekend at Modica. It actually was.

0:02:36.639 --> 0:02:40.120
<v Speaker 1>I didn't get to see the Masters yesterday. I had

0:02:40.120 --> 0:02:44.399
<v Speaker 1>to record our first podcast and just doing so many things,

0:02:44.480 --> 0:02:49.040
<v Speaker 1>a little family day, palm, Sunday, driving around, So for me,

0:02:49.320 --> 0:02:52.200
<v Speaker 1>I didn't get to enjoy it. Happy for Tiger. Not

0:02:52.320 --> 0:02:55.600
<v Speaker 1>the biggest Tiger fan, but I was respect greatness, so

0:02:55.720 --> 0:02:58.440
<v Speaker 1>I'm happy he was able to accomplish that. Feed. Yeah,

0:02:58.560 --> 0:03:00.880
<v Speaker 1>it was. It was. It was awesome, man. It was

0:03:00.960 --> 0:03:03.160
<v Speaker 1>so cool. Like I was at Judy's family's house or

0:03:03.240 --> 0:03:05.440
<v Speaker 1>dad just stood up after Tiger hits the pot and

0:03:05.560 --> 0:03:08.280
<v Speaker 1>just like Greg is with his history, I'm like, yeah,

0:03:08.320 --> 0:03:10.799
<v Speaker 1>we did. It was awesome. It was. It was cool, man,

0:03:10.919 --> 0:03:13.120
<v Speaker 1>It was cool. Uh. Then I I made sure I

0:03:13.120 --> 0:03:16.560
<v Speaker 1>was home last night, plenty of time for Thrones. Sat

0:03:16.600 --> 0:03:18.600
<v Speaker 1>down and pretty much what I expected, a big set

0:03:18.639 --> 0:03:21.840
<v Speaker 1>up for the season. It was fine. You know, I

0:03:21.880 --> 0:03:24.120
<v Speaker 1>enjoyed it. I'm here for the sentimental moments. I think

0:03:24.120 --> 0:03:26.560
<v Speaker 1>a little bit more than than you were. I was

0:03:26.560 --> 0:03:28.679
<v Speaker 1>excited about, you know, everyone meeting up and stuff. It was.

0:03:28.720 --> 0:03:32.480
<v Speaker 1>It was. It was fun to watch. I enjoyed it. Um.

0:03:32.600 --> 0:03:34.840
<v Speaker 1>You know, I see a lot of people complaining on Twitter. Greg.

0:03:35.000 --> 0:03:38.720
<v Speaker 1>The only thing worse than Game of Thrones Twitter is

0:03:39.080 --> 0:03:42.640
<v Speaker 1>people complaining about Game of Thrones Twitter. Like, dude, Like

0:03:42.680 --> 0:03:45.440
<v Speaker 1>there's mute options on Twitter, Like you can mute words,

0:03:45.480 --> 0:03:49.800
<v Speaker 1>you can you can not follow people. It's like I

0:03:49.800 --> 0:03:53.080
<v Speaker 1>don't understand, Like it's either people talking about Game of

0:03:53.120 --> 0:03:57.000
<v Speaker 1>Thrones or people complaining about Game of Thrones Twitter. Very frustrating.

0:03:57.000 --> 0:03:59.920
<v Speaker 1>Honestly favorite part of Thrones last night night even Kenn

0:04:00.600 --> 0:04:04.240
<v Speaker 1>the map. The new map is ridiculous. It is awesome.

0:04:04.600 --> 0:04:06.560
<v Speaker 1>I didn't really pay enough attention to it. Oh my god.

0:04:06.920 --> 0:04:09.640
<v Speaker 1>So basically it's just winter Felt, but they go inside

0:04:10.040 --> 0:04:12.800
<v Speaker 1>in like not just over winter Felt. They go inside it,

0:04:12.880 --> 0:04:15.480
<v Speaker 1>which is awesome, and then it's just um King's landing

0:04:15.480 --> 0:04:17.960
<v Speaker 1>when they go inside and they go inside the key

0:04:18.080 --> 0:04:21.640
<v Speaker 1>f It's awesome. You gotta check it out, seriously. Yeah.

0:04:21.680 --> 0:04:23.560
<v Speaker 1>I saw people talking about it on Reddit afterwards. I

0:04:23.600 --> 0:04:25.800
<v Speaker 1>don't know if you're thinking of like being like sarcastic, right,

0:04:25.839 --> 0:04:28.400
<v Speaker 1>but I loved it. I went back and watched it

0:04:28.400 --> 0:04:30.480
<v Speaker 1>twice before I even started the show. Yeah. I might

0:04:30.520 --> 0:04:32.880
<v Speaker 1>actually just go back and rewatch the whole episode. I

0:04:33.000 --> 0:04:35.120
<v Speaker 1>think I think you need with it. You're not you're

0:04:35.240 --> 0:04:38.160
<v Speaker 1>a Throne guy, Mat I'm a big Game of Thrones guy,

0:04:38.200 --> 0:04:41.799
<v Speaker 1>I've read all the books and stuff. I was happy

0:04:41.839 --> 0:04:45.320
<v Speaker 1>with last night's episode. Fine, but I hopefully you know

0:04:45.440 --> 0:04:49.240
<v Speaker 1>from here on it's a lot more action and we

0:04:49.320 --> 0:04:52.360
<v Speaker 1>get to see how this plays out. I believe episode

0:04:52.440 --> 0:04:55.240
<v Speaker 1>three is the Battle of Winters right, the Battle of

0:04:55.279 --> 0:04:58.240
<v Speaker 1>winser Fell ithoudan very very exciting which we're all which,

0:04:58.240 --> 0:05:00.400
<v Speaker 1>to be fair, were all assuments gonna be the We

0:05:00.480 --> 0:05:03.560
<v Speaker 1>all assume it's gonna be the living versus the dead.

0:05:03.720 --> 0:05:06.200
<v Speaker 1>But theoretically the Golden Company could be there in episode

0:05:06.560 --> 0:05:08.800
<v Speaker 1>and that could be a bottle a sandwich of action.

0:05:08.880 --> 0:05:11.640
<v Speaker 1>It could totally like totally Winter from the North and

0:05:11.680 --> 0:05:14.680
<v Speaker 1>like people from the South, and then just you know what.

0:05:14.720 --> 0:05:16.520
<v Speaker 1>I also realized this is more from Matt because I

0:05:16.560 --> 0:05:18.320
<v Speaker 1>have a feeling that Frank won't know who he is.

0:05:18.680 --> 0:05:21.240
<v Speaker 1>I think you're on just looks like an older, jacked

0:05:21.279 --> 0:05:24.840
<v Speaker 1>up Joshua Jackson is what I realized, Yes, last night,

0:05:24.839 --> 0:05:30.760
<v Speaker 1>and no Pacy from I'm not a fan, but I

0:05:30.800 --> 0:05:32.440
<v Speaker 1>know who I knew you even know who he is.

0:05:32.600 --> 0:05:35.480
<v Speaker 1>He just isn't jacked up Pacy with like a must. Seriously,

0:05:36.240 --> 0:05:38.320
<v Speaker 1>I'm not crazy about the atflets they put that guy

0:05:38.400 --> 0:05:41.760
<v Speaker 1>in it's kind of like, you know, uh, wanting to

0:05:41.760 --> 0:05:45.320
<v Speaker 1>be a hipster pirate and stuff like exactly. That's exactly

0:05:45.320 --> 0:05:47.480
<v Speaker 1>my point. You're we're on the same page here. I'm

0:05:47.520 --> 0:05:49.440
<v Speaker 1>agreeing with you. Thank you, my buddy, Thank you. All right,

0:05:49.600 --> 0:05:53.279
<v Speaker 1>let's hit it some baseball from what was that's more Thrones,

0:05:53.360 --> 0:05:57.400
<v Speaker 1>all right, So let's hit this baseball, of course from

0:05:57.440 --> 0:06:01.039
<v Speaker 1>this weekend, in particularly the Weaver. Frank, I know we

0:06:01.080 --> 0:06:03.680
<v Speaker 1>actually got Clin Fraser this week rather than last week. Okay,

0:06:03.800 --> 0:06:07.200
<v Speaker 1>twenty seven and the highest other bid was seventeen. I

0:06:07.200 --> 0:06:09.279
<v Speaker 1>think I wanted to be twenty three, but whatever, four dollars,

0:06:09.279 --> 0:06:11.720
<v Speaker 1>I'm not gonna complain. We were right around the right

0:06:11.720 --> 0:06:15.520
<v Speaker 1>bids and very very happy, uh with that. But this week,

0:06:16.240 --> 0:06:18.320
<v Speaker 1>at least from my league, when you were talking about

0:06:18.400 --> 0:06:21.000
<v Speaker 1>last night, and this isn't the number one guy by

0:06:21.040 --> 0:06:22.720
<v Speaker 1>any means, that's where I wanted to start, and that's

0:06:22.720 --> 0:06:25.000
<v Speaker 1>with Mike Sirocca, because you guys, I felt a lot

0:06:25.040 --> 0:06:27.560
<v Speaker 1>of people in the industry yourself included, Frank, and in

0:06:27.640 --> 0:06:30.200
<v Speaker 1>my Homebilly, you were very very excited about Mike Saroka.

0:06:30.920 --> 0:06:34.360
<v Speaker 1>And we're trying to figure out why exactly, because he's

0:06:34.400 --> 0:06:36.360
<v Speaker 1>not in the rotation. There are no plans to call

0:06:36.400 --> 0:06:38.720
<v Speaker 1>him up to be in the rotation as as of now,

0:06:39.320 --> 0:06:43.080
<v Speaker 1>two Ussan comes up pitches like six marvelous innings, he's

0:06:43.160 --> 0:06:45.640
<v Speaker 1>locked in the rotations, Shawn Nucom gets sent down. So

0:06:45.920 --> 0:06:48.000
<v Speaker 1>I was surprised when I saw on the train last

0:06:48.080 --> 0:06:50.800
<v Speaker 1>night that you and Florio were not about being a

0:06:50.800 --> 0:06:53.240
<v Speaker 1>bunch for Tussa, but you were all about about Mike Saroka.

0:06:53.800 --> 0:06:55.680
<v Speaker 1>And I was, like I said, confused, because that was

0:06:55.720 --> 0:06:57.080
<v Speaker 1>not where I had in my head we were gonna go.

0:06:57.240 --> 0:06:59.280
<v Speaker 1>I thought, there's gonna be a long conversation how much

0:06:59.279 --> 0:07:01.159
<v Speaker 1>to we been on two on? What's the plan? And

0:07:01.200 --> 0:07:03.480
<v Speaker 1>it was Sharroca that you guys have the discussion with.

0:07:03.640 --> 0:07:07.240
<v Speaker 1>How come you're more on Sharroka than Tussan. Well, I

0:07:07.240 --> 0:07:10.120
<v Speaker 1>think the term locked into the rotation referring to two

0:07:10.200 --> 0:07:12.400
<v Speaker 1>K two san is is a very loose term right

0:07:12.440 --> 0:07:14.760
<v Speaker 1>now because it's gonna be fluid. I think the Braves

0:07:14.840 --> 0:07:17.000
<v Speaker 1>rotation could be fluid all season long. It's gonna be

0:07:17.080 --> 0:07:20.240
<v Speaker 1>very performance based, like as long as Max Freed performs well,

0:07:20.280 --> 0:07:22.840
<v Speaker 1>he'll stay in the rotation. The same thing goes for

0:07:22.840 --> 0:07:25.200
<v Speaker 1>for a two K Twossant. They sent down Seawan Nucomb

0:07:25.520 --> 0:07:28.080
<v Speaker 1>try and get him right because the command the control

0:07:28.120 --> 0:07:30.200
<v Speaker 1>has just been terrible. It's been god awful. So they

0:07:30.240 --> 0:07:32.520
<v Speaker 1>sent him down, try and get him right. And Mike

0:07:32.560 --> 0:07:35.360
<v Speaker 1>Foltonevitch is gonna be back for this team as well.

0:07:35.840 --> 0:07:38.040
<v Speaker 1>So there's a lot of moving parts for the Braves rotation,

0:07:38.040 --> 0:07:41.080
<v Speaker 1>but ultimately I believe whoever performs well is going to

0:07:41.200 --> 0:07:43.200
<v Speaker 1>be in this rotation. I don't know if that anyone's

0:07:43.200 --> 0:07:45.000
<v Speaker 1>a lock. I don't know that Julio toron'so lock for

0:07:45.000 --> 0:07:48.160
<v Speaker 1>this rotation either, but it's gonna be very performance based,

0:07:48.200 --> 0:07:50.880
<v Speaker 1>and if I'm just looking at it based on skills,

0:07:50.920 --> 0:07:54.960
<v Speaker 1>who has the best skills? Um. I loved Mikesaroka last season.

0:07:55.000 --> 0:07:57.480
<v Speaker 1>I'm not going to back off of him now. He's

0:07:57.520 --> 0:07:59.680
<v Speaker 1>made two starts in the minors so far, his first

0:07:59.800 --> 0:08:02.480
<v Speaker 1>one on his second one wasn't as good four earned

0:08:02.520 --> 0:08:04.040
<v Speaker 1>runs in four and a third endings, but his first

0:08:04.040 --> 0:08:06.840
<v Speaker 1>one five perfect endings with seven strikeouts. He has always

0:08:06.840 --> 0:08:08.320
<v Speaker 1>been a guy who gets a ton of ground balls

0:08:08.360 --> 0:08:10.640
<v Speaker 1>as well. So me personally, if I think it's a

0:08:10.640 --> 0:08:13.560
<v Speaker 1>fluid rotation and ultimately talent will win out, and that

0:08:13.560 --> 0:08:15.760
<v Speaker 1>that's who's gonna end up in this rotation, and that

0:08:15.840 --> 0:08:18.360
<v Speaker 1>leads me to believe that at some point Mike Sarroka

0:08:18.480 --> 0:08:20.480
<v Speaker 1>is going to be in this rotation. And it's not

0:08:20.520 --> 0:08:22.520
<v Speaker 1>a knock on Tuk Tuson. I like him a lot.

0:08:23.080 --> 0:08:24.840
<v Speaker 1>I don't like him enough to bid the you know

0:08:24.880 --> 0:08:27.080
<v Speaker 1>twelve to fifteen percent that people were bidding on him

0:08:27.160 --> 0:08:30.400
<v Speaker 1>last night, because as high as the strikeout upside is

0:08:30.760 --> 0:08:33.880
<v Speaker 1>still have a lot of concerns regarding command with him.

0:08:34.040 --> 0:08:36.640
<v Speaker 1>He walks a lot of guys as well. So he's

0:08:36.760 --> 0:08:39.040
<v Speaker 1>a high upside picture, but there's also a very low

0:08:39.040 --> 0:08:42.080
<v Speaker 1>floor based on based on his command. So I like Toussan,

0:08:42.240 --> 0:08:43.600
<v Speaker 1>but I like so Rocca a little bit more. How

0:08:43.600 --> 0:08:45.000
<v Speaker 1>do you reread? How do you break this down? Matt?

0:08:45.040 --> 0:08:49.120
<v Speaker 1>Between two Tussan, I think Frank Kittle a lot of

0:08:49.120 --> 0:08:52.200
<v Speaker 1>good points here saying that it's fluid. It's very fluid.

0:08:52.200 --> 0:08:55.760
<v Speaker 1>I think there's two spots for three people. That's Tousan

0:08:56.480 --> 0:09:00.440
<v Speaker 1>Ahfried and I'm like Frank lest year. I've been on

0:09:00.520 --> 0:09:04.960
<v Speaker 1>Saroka everywhere, owned them everywhere. Unfortunately, you know, he was

0:09:04.960 --> 0:09:08.280
<v Speaker 1>shut down the shoulder. I was excited again for him

0:09:08.360 --> 0:09:11.520
<v Speaker 1>this season. I think he's major league ready to be

0:09:11.679 --> 0:09:14.839
<v Speaker 1>a starting pitcher. I think they're best if he can,

0:09:14.920 --> 0:09:19.280
<v Speaker 1>if he can be the guy they're anticipating, I think

0:09:19.280 --> 0:09:22.560
<v Speaker 1>he works best for them. Freed has a lot of upside,

0:09:23.640 --> 0:09:26.160
<v Speaker 1>but the jury is still out on him to sign

0:09:26.320 --> 0:09:29.439
<v Speaker 1>for me. I'm not sure. I'm not sure what he

0:09:29.520 --> 0:09:34.359
<v Speaker 1>truly is. Is he more of a middle relief inning picture,

0:09:34.400 --> 0:09:37.359
<v Speaker 1>you know, like those multiple innings you get the high strikeouts,

0:09:38.080 --> 0:09:40.640
<v Speaker 1>or can he really be a starting pitcher. I know

0:09:40.760 --> 0:09:43.400
<v Speaker 1>some people feel he's definitely going to be a starting picture.

0:09:43.840 --> 0:09:47.280
<v Speaker 1>Some people feel, you know, it's maybe not gonna end

0:09:47.320 --> 0:09:49.880
<v Speaker 1>up that way. So the jury is still out. I

0:09:49.920 --> 0:09:53.720
<v Speaker 1>love Sarroka. I found out though. The interesting thing was

0:09:53.760 --> 0:09:57.760
<v Speaker 1>two weeks ago actual people bidding on Sarrocca, and I

0:09:57.760 --> 0:09:59.480
<v Speaker 1>thought I was like, wow, I thought I had time,

0:09:59.760 --> 0:10:02.280
<v Speaker 1>And last week, wherever he was available, I did scoop

0:10:02.360 --> 0:10:05.560
<v Speaker 1>him up. Yeah, people are all over here, Mike Saroka

0:10:06.040 --> 0:10:08.880
<v Speaker 1>um grabbing him. Now the own of my team leaves

0:10:08.880 --> 0:10:11.120
<v Speaker 1>my Great Fantasy Based Romitational, my main event. He was

0:10:11.120 --> 0:10:14.040
<v Speaker 1>already owning both of those. Uh, he got scooped up

0:10:14.120 --> 0:10:18.520
<v Speaker 1>last night in G S T as well. I believe yes,

0:10:18.559 --> 0:10:20.600
<v Speaker 1>he went for he only went for four bucks head

0:10:20.600 --> 0:10:22.640
<v Speaker 1>of a thousand, so maybe we should have been a

0:10:22.679 --> 0:10:24.679
<v Speaker 1>little bit more aggressive on that, but we chose to

0:10:24.679 --> 0:10:26.720
<v Speaker 1>to pick up jeff'son margin over Mike Sarroka. He does

0:10:26.760 --> 0:10:28.840
<v Speaker 1>have the job for now. We'll see what happens there.

0:10:28.880 --> 0:10:30.280
<v Speaker 1>It's interesting because when I wanted to pick up to

0:10:30.679 --> 0:10:32.480
<v Speaker 1>last night you you were kind of all about Greg.

0:10:32.520 --> 0:10:35.000
<v Speaker 1>You're you're being very shortsighted about this, and like, you're right,

0:10:35.040 --> 0:10:38.160
<v Speaker 1>I am being shortsighted because I know you're staying on brand,

0:10:38.400 --> 0:10:42.679
<v Speaker 1>which appreciate the consistency. And question question if two key

0:10:42.800 --> 0:10:46.240
<v Speaker 1>two shot didn't come in Saturday night, what would you

0:10:46.280 --> 0:10:48.439
<v Speaker 1>be this excited? Even if they said he's gonna be

0:10:48.440 --> 0:10:50.679
<v Speaker 1>in the rotation, but he didn't pitch Saturday night that

0:10:50.880 --> 0:10:54.920
<v Speaker 1>I loved seven was seven strikeouts and shut out ball.

0:10:55.640 --> 0:10:58.840
<v Speaker 1>Oh great, But I don't know what he truly is

0:10:58.920 --> 0:11:02.040
<v Speaker 1>going forward? Well, so so I I want to I

0:11:02.040 --> 0:11:04.880
<v Speaker 1>would not be this excited, No, for sure, Matt, but

0:11:05.000 --> 0:11:07.880
<v Speaker 1>I but I would be excited. I remember he had

0:11:07.920 --> 0:11:11.200
<v Speaker 1>some hype buildings for him throughout the spring. People wanted

0:11:11.240 --> 0:11:13.520
<v Speaker 1>to be and he finally got this opportunity right towards

0:11:13.520 --> 0:11:15.600
<v Speaker 1>the beginning of the season. So I would have been

0:11:15.640 --> 0:11:17.160
<v Speaker 1>if if you would have told me right away he's

0:11:17.160 --> 0:11:19.480
<v Speaker 1>in the rotation, I would have been excited. I really

0:11:19.520 --> 0:11:21.880
<v Speaker 1>think so, and I think most people would be excited.

0:11:21.880 --> 0:11:23.640
<v Speaker 1>I agree with you on that, but not as excited.

0:11:23.679 --> 0:11:28.200
<v Speaker 1>I don't know that well to percent of fab in

0:11:28.280 --> 0:11:32.440
<v Speaker 1>some leagues. He went for a hundred and thirty three

0:11:32.440 --> 0:11:35.160
<v Speaker 1>dollars in my main event last night, so in our

0:11:35.200 --> 0:11:37.040
<v Speaker 1>main event that that Matt Modiga plays in as well,

0:11:37.080 --> 0:11:39.160
<v Speaker 1>so people were regressive. The backup bid was seventy five

0:11:39.160 --> 0:11:41.720
<v Speaker 1>dollars on him, but you know that's probably where the

0:11:41.760 --> 0:11:44.920
<v Speaker 1>ranking would have been. If he didn't pitch in that

0:11:44.960 --> 0:11:47.240
<v Speaker 1>relief and pitch that well, you know, he probably would

0:11:47.240 --> 0:11:49.600
<v Speaker 1>have been in that, you know, definitely, But you know,

0:11:49.760 --> 0:11:51.840
<v Speaker 1>because he pitched as well as he did, and people

0:11:52.000 --> 0:11:53.960
<v Speaker 1>remember the last thing they saw. He goes for more

0:11:54.000 --> 0:11:55.800
<v Speaker 1>than I think the other thing that I gives maybe

0:11:55.800 --> 0:11:57.679
<v Speaker 1>a little bit hesitant on Serrocca, and I know talent

0:11:57.760 --> 0:12:00.800
<v Speaker 1>was out. I completely understand that, and they he'll wind

0:12:00.800 --> 0:12:03.280
<v Speaker 1>out spending the majority of the season in the rotation,

0:12:03.640 --> 0:12:05.160
<v Speaker 1>as you kind of believe it. I know you believe

0:12:05.200 --> 0:12:10.040
<v Speaker 1>that as well. But Sean Nucom maybe back next before Saroca,

0:12:10.240 --> 0:12:13.040
<v Speaker 1>Right Like, there's no guarantee that Sirocca is the next

0:12:13.040 --> 0:12:15.560
<v Speaker 1>guy up for Atlanta. There's no guarantee for anybody in

0:12:15.559 --> 0:12:18.240
<v Speaker 1>this sortation. Definitely not spoke about this Friday, Kevin Gausman.

0:12:18.360 --> 0:12:20.440
<v Speaker 1>I don't think he's very good. I don't think Kevin

0:12:20.440 --> 0:12:23.160
<v Speaker 1>Gosman like me personally. You're you're not in on him either.

0:12:23.480 --> 0:12:25.320
<v Speaker 1>He's a two pitch pitcher. He relies on the splitter

0:12:25.360 --> 0:12:28.040
<v Speaker 1>a ton. I don't think he's that good. So who's

0:12:28.040 --> 0:12:30.080
<v Speaker 1>like if he struggles, who's to say he doesn't get

0:12:30.080 --> 0:12:32.439
<v Speaker 1>moved to long relief in the minors or whatever it

0:12:32.520 --> 0:12:34.160
<v Speaker 1>might be. I don't think anyone is a lock for

0:12:34.160 --> 0:12:37.080
<v Speaker 1>this sortation. I agree, and that's why I don't necessarily

0:12:37.120 --> 0:12:39.400
<v Speaker 1>break the bank for Tussan or for Sarocca. To be

0:12:39.440 --> 0:12:42.360
<v Speaker 1>honest with you, but if Sirocca performs well like we

0:12:42.400 --> 0:12:44.920
<v Speaker 1>think he could, just given you know, the strikeout upside

0:12:44.920 --> 0:12:46.160
<v Speaker 1>we think he has and the fact that he gets

0:12:46.160 --> 0:12:49.520
<v Speaker 1>as many groundballs as he does, I might go as

0:12:49.559 --> 0:12:51.040
<v Speaker 1>far as say he might be the best picture one

0:12:51.200 --> 0:12:53.960
<v Speaker 1>like in this rotation. Once, once it's all said and done,

0:12:53.960 --> 0:12:55.880
<v Speaker 1>he might be the best picture in this rotation, Max

0:12:55.880 --> 0:12:59.079
<v Speaker 1>street Man. I like Max free to, but for another

0:12:59.080 --> 0:13:04.160
<v Speaker 1>two pitch picture. Freddy Freeman was really talking on Max Freed.

0:13:04.559 --> 0:13:06.520
<v Speaker 1>And the thing with Suroka now is you can get

0:13:06.600 --> 0:13:08.920
<v Speaker 1>him cheap, Like in the last couple of weeks, you're

0:13:08.960 --> 0:13:12.439
<v Speaker 1>getting him for basically nothing. I mean, I've seen to sapings,

0:13:12.480 --> 0:13:16.199
<v Speaker 1>like Frank said, throughout, I've seen as high as two

0:13:16.280 --> 0:13:18.280
<v Speaker 1>hundred a little over that, and I thought that was

0:13:18.320 --> 0:13:20.840
<v Speaker 1>a little crazy. I was bidding on Tucson. Don't get

0:13:20.880 --> 0:13:22.760
<v Speaker 1>me wrong with like, I don't like Toussan. I'm just

0:13:23.080 --> 0:13:26.000
<v Speaker 1>trying to make an argument here. Yeah, and and and

0:13:26.040 --> 0:13:28.200
<v Speaker 1>I appreciate it. And then you go um with Max

0:13:28.240 --> 0:13:31.120
<v Speaker 1>Freed and and all these guys at the Braves. But

0:13:31.559 --> 0:13:33.480
<v Speaker 1>these guys are right. If Siroga is still out there

0:13:33.520 --> 0:13:36.440
<v Speaker 1>in year league and he's not costing you anything, you know,

0:13:37.320 --> 0:13:39.040
<v Speaker 1>now was the time. Now was the time if you

0:13:39.080 --> 0:13:41.520
<v Speaker 1>have the bench spot to a bench spot available for

0:13:41.600 --> 0:13:43.760
<v Speaker 1>you to stash him. Before we move on to the Braves,

0:13:43.800 --> 0:13:46.000
<v Speaker 1>that you want to mention Arronasiskayana hits the d L

0:13:46.280 --> 0:13:48.679
<v Speaker 1>with right shoulder inflammation. As we've seen with a guy

0:13:48.720 --> 0:13:52.800
<v Speaker 1>like Dylan Patances right shoulder inflammation or Luis Savarino right shoulder.

0:13:52.800 --> 0:13:54.800
<v Speaker 1>Information can last a while because I have to figure

0:13:54.800 --> 0:13:57.960
<v Speaker 1>out why it's inflamed. And he had at least similar

0:13:58.000 --> 0:14:00.160
<v Speaker 1>issues last season. I believe it was the same exact

0:14:00.000 --> 0:14:02.679
<v Speaker 1>act injury, which means a J. Mints A taking over

0:14:02.720 --> 0:14:05.280
<v Speaker 1>as the closer in Atlanta for now. If he's available,

0:14:05.280 --> 0:14:07.719
<v Speaker 1>he's must add Frank. Yeah, absolutely, You're not going to

0:14:07.800 --> 0:14:10.040
<v Speaker 1>be available in any fifteen team leagues. But you know

0:14:10.760 --> 0:14:12.680
<v Speaker 1>a big majority of people that listen to the show

0:14:12.720 --> 0:14:14.600
<v Speaker 1>play in twelve team leagues. He might have been out there.

0:14:14.600 --> 0:14:16.880
<v Speaker 1>I think you have to be aggressive. It's his job

0:14:16.960 --> 0:14:19.440
<v Speaker 1>to lose, unless, of course, the Braves get in on

0:14:19.720 --> 0:14:22.600
<v Speaker 1>Craig Kimbrill bidding once once June comes around, when the

0:14:22.720 --> 0:14:25.720
<v Speaker 1>draft compensation gets lifted from him. But for now, it's

0:14:25.800 --> 0:14:28.240
<v Speaker 1>a J mentor's job to lose. And uh, you know

0:14:28.840 --> 0:14:30.880
<v Speaker 1>Rodi's vis kay. You know, I've I've read some really

0:14:30.920 --> 0:14:33.160
<v Speaker 1>pessimistic reports regarding this injury. He could be out a

0:14:33.200 --> 0:14:35.600
<v Speaker 1>long long time, So I think it's a J mentor's

0:14:35.640 --> 0:14:38.520
<v Speaker 1>job right now. Yeahs, you gotta be aggressive. I have

0:14:38.600 --> 0:14:40.400
<v Speaker 1>to be aggressive with a J. Mintjo and just like

0:14:40.440 --> 0:14:43.120
<v Speaker 1>I was last summer with Mintor, because if this guy

0:14:43.560 --> 0:14:46.400
<v Speaker 1>is out for a while, Mintjer may not relinquish this job.

0:14:46.440 --> 0:14:47.960
<v Speaker 1>This is what we said last year, and he's gonna

0:14:48.000 --> 0:14:49.800
<v Speaker 1>have an opportunity this year. This is one of those

0:14:49.880 --> 0:14:52.400
<v Speaker 1>rare instances, Matt. I know we always speculate on who

0:14:52.400 --> 0:14:54.840
<v Speaker 1>the closer could be. If a closer goes down where

0:14:54.880 --> 0:14:57.360
<v Speaker 1>you know it's Mintor, there aren't any question marks like

0:14:57.520 --> 0:15:01.840
<v Speaker 1>this is the guy. I agree right now right it's

0:15:01.920 --> 0:15:05.080
<v Speaker 1>a j mentor, like Frank said, be aggressive. My thing

0:15:05.200 --> 0:15:09.280
<v Speaker 1>is is just now the perfect opportunity for Greg Kimball

0:15:09.360 --> 0:15:13.160
<v Speaker 1>to get the homecoming. Certainly possible, certainly possible. But you

0:15:13.240 --> 0:15:15.400
<v Speaker 1>also when you mentioned the Braves, you probably you mentioned

0:15:15.440 --> 0:15:17.880
<v Speaker 1>Kaiko too. Even they're all the questions they have about

0:15:17.880 --> 0:15:19.880
<v Speaker 1>their rotation, there could be a spot for Kaiko and

0:15:20.080 --> 0:15:23.560
<v Speaker 1>or Kimberle. There's a few spots where where Dallas Kaiko

0:15:23.680 --> 0:15:25.680
<v Speaker 1>could end up. I think you know San Diego they've

0:15:25.760 --> 0:15:28.280
<v Speaker 1>they've talked about it as well. You know they're making

0:15:28.600 --> 0:15:31.680
<v Speaker 1>do with guys like Eric Lauer for now and your

0:15:31.720 --> 0:15:35.960
<v Speaker 1>favorite Nick Vicious margat Vicious over there, which you know, look,

0:15:36.000 --> 0:15:38.200
<v Speaker 1>I don't have a ton of faith in regarding him.

0:15:38.280 --> 0:15:41.160
<v Speaker 1>They have Paddock, obviously, they have Matt strom Strom bounced

0:15:41.160 --> 0:15:44.280
<v Speaker 1>back in his most recent start, but they don't really

0:15:44.320 --> 0:15:46.360
<v Speaker 1>have a veteran that they can lean on. And I

0:15:46.400 --> 0:15:47.840
<v Speaker 1>think it would make a lot of sense for Dallas

0:15:47.880 --> 0:15:49.960
<v Speaker 1>Kaiko to end up with a team like San Diego,

0:15:50.040 --> 0:15:52.000
<v Speaker 1>especially if they want to be aggressive, which they have been.

0:15:52.080 --> 0:15:54.640
<v Speaker 1>You know, uh Fernando Tati Junior starting the year in

0:15:54.680 --> 0:15:56.800
<v Speaker 1>the majors. Do they really want to make a push

0:15:56.840 --> 0:15:58.920
<v Speaker 1>for a wild card spot or even the division. I

0:15:58.960 --> 0:16:01.000
<v Speaker 1>think Dallas Kaiki make might make a lot of sense

0:16:01.560 --> 0:16:04.080
<v Speaker 1>for a team like San Diego. And he was floating

0:16:04.120 --> 0:16:07.000
<v Speaker 1>around on a few fifteen teamers. He wasn't available in

0:16:07.040 --> 0:16:09.560
<v Speaker 1>any of mine. But our buddy Florio texted us and

0:16:09.600 --> 0:16:13.280
<v Speaker 1>said he'd been seventy nine dollars on on Dallas Kaiko

0:16:13.320 --> 0:16:15.480
<v Speaker 1>because he was available in one of his fifteen team leagues.

0:16:15.600 --> 0:16:19.320
<v Speaker 1>The next closest bid Greg One. That's a terrible feeling,

0:16:19.320 --> 0:16:23.360
<v Speaker 1>man hate, but I look, I can't blame him for

0:16:23.400 --> 0:16:26.000
<v Speaker 1>being aggressive on Kaiko. I mean in the team league,

0:16:26.320 --> 0:16:28.280
<v Speaker 1>you know, seven pcent. I don't. I don't think it's terrible,

0:16:28.320 --> 0:16:33.720
<v Speaker 1>but wow, sucks I don't think you can give me

0:16:33.760 --> 0:16:37.440
<v Speaker 1>too heartbroken about that. He really I know. Look, it's

0:16:37.520 --> 0:16:40.080
<v Speaker 1>human nature. We hate to see that the run up

0:16:40.120 --> 0:16:42.880
<v Speaker 1>bid was so low where we overbid, but you got

0:16:42.960 --> 0:16:47.000
<v Speaker 1>your guy. That's always gotta be your goal. It's very

0:16:47.120 --> 0:16:50.040
<v Speaker 1>difficult to try and nail these things, especially in competitive

0:16:50.080 --> 0:16:52.920
<v Speaker 1>fifteen teams. Hunter Dozer was a guy that you know,

0:16:53.120 --> 0:16:56.080
<v Speaker 1>I missed that everywhere last night I definitely do and

0:16:56.480 --> 0:16:59.280
<v Speaker 1>just and I was in on up was in a

0:16:59.320 --> 0:17:01.800
<v Speaker 1>hundred doze or to uh and in our main event, Greg,

0:17:01.840 --> 0:17:04.639
<v Speaker 1>he goes for a hundred and twenty seven dollars. Why

0:17:04.680 --> 0:17:07.800
<v Speaker 1>don't you explain to everybody why Hunter Doser was so

0:17:07.920 --> 0:17:11.000
<v Speaker 1>popular this weekend. Yes, it's a very small sample size.

0:17:11.040 --> 0:17:12.920
<v Speaker 1>Everything is. I'll tell you more about it over the break.

0:17:12.960 --> 0:17:15.439
<v Speaker 1>But he's made strides in terms of his bad at

0:17:15.440 --> 0:17:17.760
<v Speaker 1>ball data this year, and he's striking out less two

0:17:17.800 --> 0:17:20.160
<v Speaker 1>so and he has the prospect pedigree. He's been around

0:17:20.160 --> 0:17:22.640
<v Speaker 1>a while. But I think there's lots of like. There's

0:17:22.640 --> 0:17:27.520
<v Speaker 1>also reason he's getting more playing time now very day. Goodbye, Ryan,

0:17:27.560 --> 0:17:30.359
<v Speaker 1>all right, say right, we'll come back more of the

0:17:30.359 --> 0:17:32.280
<v Speaker 1>waiver wire and we're baseball come out next to me

0:17:39.760 --> 0:17:44.040
<v Speaker 1>Daily rodo dot com. Learned from the game's best DFS players.

0:17:44.560 --> 0:17:48.639
<v Speaker 1>We don't just give you advice. We play every day,

0:17:49.119 --> 0:17:53.440
<v Speaker 1>all major sports, all year round. We never stopped industry

0:17:53.480 --> 0:17:57.359
<v Speaker 1>leading DFS tools and custom projections, and now the Daily

0:17:57.400 --> 0:18:01.280
<v Speaker 1>roado dot Com Optimizer. In minutes, build an optimized line

0:18:01.320 --> 0:18:04.399
<v Speaker 1>up for cash games and tourneys. Learn from the game's

0:18:04.440 --> 0:18:09.680
<v Speaker 1>best DFS players. Join Daily roado dot com. The following

0:18:09.680 --> 0:18:14.919
<v Speaker 1>ad contains shocking material. Listener discretion is advised. Is someone

0:18:14.960 --> 0:18:18.080
<v Speaker 1>in your family playing at a dangerous game of Russian Roulette?

0:18:18.240 --> 0:18:21.920
<v Speaker 1>Over forty three thousand people die a year from drug overdose.

0:18:22.160 --> 0:18:25.960
<v Speaker 1>A hundred and twenty people a day, five people every hour,

0:18:26.320 --> 0:18:31.639
<v Speaker 1>one person every twelve minutes. Eight thousand people die every

0:18:31.720 --> 0:18:35.240
<v Speaker 1>year from alcohol abuse. Over two hundred and forty people

0:18:35.280 --> 0:18:39.119
<v Speaker 1>a day, ten an hour, one person every six minutes.

0:18:39.640 --> 0:18:43.159
<v Speaker 1>Somebody you know, maybe next learn how to help someone

0:18:43.280 --> 0:18:47.560
<v Speaker 1>you love get away from the drugs, alcohol, and bad influences.

0:18:47.760 --> 0:18:49.879
<v Speaker 1>With the f m l A, people can take a

0:18:49.960 --> 0:18:52.600
<v Speaker 1>leave of absence from their job and still keep it.

0:18:52.880 --> 0:18:56.200
<v Speaker 1>Call now and learn how we can help you. Eight

0:18:56.359 --> 0:19:01.160
<v Speaker 1>six six eight four nine six to one age six

0:19:01.200 --> 0:19:05.120
<v Speaker 1>six four eight four nine six two one. That's age

0:19:05.200 --> 0:19:10.280
<v Speaker 1>six six four eight four ninety six. Fantasy Sports Today,

0:19:10.440 --> 0:19:11.880
<v Speaker 1>Elo him and As. I mean a lot of people

0:19:11.880 --> 0:19:14.280
<v Speaker 1>talk about La Guerrero and he's gonna be a great player.

0:19:14.359 --> 0:19:16.440
<v Speaker 1>But if I was in a dynasty league, I think

0:19:16.440 --> 0:19:19.560
<v Speaker 1>I'd rather have him and As over Guerrero. Just when

0:19:19.600 --> 0:19:22.040
<v Speaker 1>you look at but you look at Guerrero's body type,

0:19:22.240 --> 0:19:24.800
<v Speaker 1>and to me, he looks like eventually he might eventually

0:19:24.840 --> 0:19:28.160
<v Speaker 1>turn it too, maybe a d H a tremendous hitting

0:19:28.200 --> 0:19:31.200
<v Speaker 1>th H. But Elo hit him him and As seems

0:19:31.200 --> 0:19:34.720
<v Speaker 1>to have you know all the tools. Saturdays, eight am

0:19:34.760 --> 0:19:38.520
<v Speaker 1>Eastern on the Fantasy Sports networking on your popular podcast providers.

0:19:44.440 --> 0:19:47.639
<v Speaker 1>I love when the Vota paid attention. It's the best,

0:19:48.240 --> 0:19:50.679
<v Speaker 1>it really is. He was right on the money. He

0:19:50.720 --> 0:19:51.960
<v Speaker 1>was right on the money. We game with Throw and

0:19:52.000 --> 0:19:55.320
<v Speaker 1>Starts program and then giving us the Dawson's Creek intro

0:19:55.720 --> 0:19:59.440
<v Speaker 1>when I mentioned Joshua Jackson Pacy from Dawson's Creek. Will

0:19:59.440 --> 0:20:02.560
<v Speaker 1>you be singing today's introad? A few out a view

0:20:02.560 --> 0:20:06.040
<v Speaker 1>your question. They don't sing, so I'm trying, please stop singing.

0:20:06.119 --> 0:20:08.639
<v Speaker 1>So I'm trying to, you know, give the people what

0:20:08.680 --> 0:20:10.840
<v Speaker 1>they want. There you go. We're now a show of

0:20:10.840 --> 0:20:12.679
<v Speaker 1>the people, and we've always been a show of the

0:20:12.680 --> 0:20:15.600
<v Speaker 1>people except for when you're seeing hey, Greg in the

0:20:15.680 --> 0:20:18.679
<v Speaker 1>next couple of days. Though, I may have something that

0:20:18.720 --> 0:20:21.199
<v Speaker 1>you're going to be it's a little surprised, um, But

0:20:21.520 --> 0:20:24.919
<v Speaker 1>that singing thing, yeah, it's probably not gonna happen my birthday.

0:20:25.000 --> 0:20:28.000
<v Speaker 1>My birthday passed though, Chris So no, no, no, no,

0:20:28.040 --> 0:20:30.400
<v Speaker 1>that's no, that's fine. It's for the show, all right.

0:20:31.320 --> 0:20:34.000
<v Speaker 1>For karaoke. We're gonna have to do a like a

0:20:34.040 --> 0:20:36.720
<v Speaker 1>team building outing to karaoke and you can get it

0:20:36.720 --> 0:20:39.080
<v Speaker 1>all out there. Greg. You know, I don't get it's

0:20:39.119 --> 0:20:41.200
<v Speaker 1>for eventually a Christmas party and know we still haven't

0:20:41.200 --> 0:20:46.119
<v Speaker 1>waiting on that. Moving on, just saying moving on. The

0:20:46.240 --> 0:20:49.640
<v Speaker 1>hun a hundred does are Yeah. I mentioned what he's

0:20:49.640 --> 0:20:52.000
<v Speaker 1>doing with his bad and ball data. The hard hit

0:20:52.119 --> 0:20:54.479
<v Speaker 1>rate up this year again, small sample size only has

0:20:54.520 --> 0:20:58.040
<v Speaker 1>thirty six bad balls. Hard hit rate. The average eggs

0:20:58.040 --> 0:21:01.000
<v Speaker 1>of last ninety three point six isles per hour. That's

0:21:01.080 --> 0:21:03.399
<v Speaker 1>up from eighty nine miles per hour last season. Launch

0:21:03.440 --> 0:21:05.840
<v Speaker 1>angles up a little bit, as well as batting averages

0:21:05.840 --> 0:21:08.479
<v Speaker 1>to fifty six, which is fine, but according to Baseball Savant.

0:21:08.680 --> 0:21:11.760
<v Speaker 1>They haven't expected batting average at two nine two greg,

0:21:11.840 --> 0:21:15.760
<v Speaker 1>So there's a lot to like regarding Hunter Dozer right now.

0:21:15.800 --> 0:21:18.960
<v Speaker 1>The strikeout rate last year this year down to sixteen

0:21:19.560 --> 0:21:21.400
<v Speaker 1>really small sample size, Let's see if he can keep

0:21:21.400 --> 0:21:24.600
<v Speaker 1>it up. But so far he's made some significant gains

0:21:24.680 --> 0:21:27.160
<v Speaker 1>at the dish this season. I wanted to be aggressive

0:21:27.160 --> 0:21:28.920
<v Speaker 1>on him. I know, you know, I'm not gonna go

0:21:28.920 --> 0:21:30.720
<v Speaker 1>over a hundred dollars for a guy like hundred Dozer.

0:21:30.760 --> 0:21:32.720
<v Speaker 1>I was gonna spend you know, four to six percent

0:21:32.840 --> 0:21:34.879
<v Speaker 1>something like that, and I had a bit of forty

0:21:34.880 --> 0:21:37.439
<v Speaker 1>three dollars. He goes for a hundred and twenty seven

0:21:37.720 --> 0:21:39.800
<v Speaker 1>in our main event at forty three dollar backup bid.

0:21:40.280 --> 0:21:42.600
<v Speaker 1>That was the next closest bid, which was my bid.

0:21:42.920 --> 0:21:45.360
<v Speaker 1>So I wasn't on a hundred Dozer, but I wasn't

0:21:45.400 --> 0:21:47.199
<v Speaker 1>willing to break the bank form not Evel, where are

0:21:47.200 --> 0:21:50.640
<v Speaker 1>you a Hunter Doser? He was one of my sleepers

0:21:50.680 --> 0:21:53.880
<v Speaker 1>this season. He's a guy I owning, uh pretty much

0:21:53.920 --> 0:21:57.040
<v Speaker 1>all my Draft Champion leagues and a guy I should

0:21:57.040 --> 0:21:59.840
<v Speaker 1>have probably acquired last week. I would have got him

0:21:59.840 --> 0:22:03.720
<v Speaker 1>for nothing, you know, pretty much nothing, And this week

0:22:03.760 --> 0:22:06.680
<v Speaker 1>I put in say four bids are so a little

0:22:06.760 --> 0:22:10.159
<v Speaker 1>less a little more, and I really wasn't close in

0:22:10.200 --> 0:22:12.480
<v Speaker 1>the majority. I think I got him in one or two,

0:22:12.960 --> 0:22:15.760
<v Speaker 1>but I pretty much bid on him and almost all

0:22:17.440 --> 0:22:21.080
<v Speaker 1>So people are in on hunterd Doser obviously, people hoping

0:22:21.440 --> 0:22:25.000
<v Speaker 1>uh that he will h has learned has the sample

0:22:25.040 --> 0:22:27.840
<v Speaker 1>size will go bigger and the consistency will remain with

0:22:27.920 --> 0:22:30.680
<v Speaker 1>a guy like hundred Doser. So of the other top

0:22:30.720 --> 0:22:32.720
<v Speaker 1>bids that I saw this week, and you guys in

0:22:32.800 --> 0:22:36.480
<v Speaker 1>comment on them. As we continue on Ruenna's alias in

0:22:36.640 --> 0:22:38.480
<v Speaker 1>r G S T League, Frank went for a hundred

0:22:38.520 --> 0:22:42.920
<v Speaker 1>twenty seven dollars O come. People are desperate for saves.

0:22:42.960 --> 0:22:45.240
<v Speaker 1>Obviously they see him pick up a saved this past

0:22:45.280 --> 0:22:47.360
<v Speaker 1>week as well. That was a game where the game

0:22:47.440 --> 0:22:49.680
<v Speaker 1>was tied when Anthony Sporzact pitched in the eighth inning

0:22:49.680 --> 0:22:52.440
<v Speaker 1>and then Ronan Slias comes in in the ninth and

0:22:52.440 --> 0:22:54.760
<v Speaker 1>and picks up a save there. So people are just

0:22:54.760 --> 0:22:57.119
<v Speaker 1>trying to find saves anyway that they could. I understand that,

0:22:57.160 --> 0:22:58.919
<v Speaker 1>you know, you take a few speculative ads. I mean,

0:22:58.920 --> 0:23:01.080
<v Speaker 1>I wasn't gonna be very aggressive on him because I

0:23:01.119 --> 0:23:03.840
<v Speaker 1>still do think that Anthony Swarzak is the main closure.

0:23:03.880 --> 0:23:06.639
<v Speaker 1>I mean, maybe they make lies in a little bit,

0:23:06.680 --> 0:23:08.520
<v Speaker 1>you know, if there's a a bunch of lefties coming up.

0:23:08.560 --> 0:23:11.080
<v Speaker 1>So I get it, you know, you try and take

0:23:11.119 --> 0:23:13.200
<v Speaker 1>a stabbt getting ten to twelve saves something like that

0:23:13.840 --> 0:23:16.160
<v Speaker 1>out of him. But me personally, I still think Anthony

0:23:16.200 --> 0:23:19.719
<v Speaker 1>Swarzak is the guy until maybe around the trade deadline

0:23:19.720 --> 0:23:21.879
<v Speaker 1>if they end up ultimately moving him. But I think

0:23:21.920 --> 0:23:24.879
<v Speaker 1>it's war Zak for now. I agree, what other what

0:23:25.000 --> 0:23:27.120
<v Speaker 1>other names here, Matt, were you in on this week?

0:23:27.119 --> 0:23:29.040
<v Speaker 1>Because I'm kind of going down, uh one of our

0:23:29.080 --> 0:23:32.680
<v Speaker 1>fifteen team league list, nothing really is standing out to me.

0:23:32.720 --> 0:23:34.960
<v Speaker 1>I'll give you some names that Frankie, Frankie and I've

0:23:34.960 --> 0:23:36.959
<v Speaker 1>been on. But who are your targets this week? Who

0:23:37.000 --> 0:23:38.879
<v Speaker 1>are the biggest targets in your in your big leagues?

0:23:39.600 --> 0:23:44.040
<v Speaker 1>I think in UM as far as you know, arms

0:23:44.160 --> 0:23:46.879
<v Speaker 1>not closures now. But I think the one guy was

0:23:46.960 --> 0:23:51.520
<v Speaker 1>Nick Anderson. I mean, he has a path where you

0:23:51.560 --> 0:23:54.320
<v Speaker 1>can see him closing at some point for the Marlins,

0:23:54.480 --> 0:23:56.520
<v Speaker 1>and I did that path could come sooner than later.

0:23:56.800 --> 0:24:00.640
<v Speaker 1>I believe he's currently reading all relief pictures and strikeout percentage,

0:24:01.280 --> 0:24:04.760
<v Speaker 1>so He's somebody I would definitely want to get. I

0:24:04.800 --> 0:24:08.760
<v Speaker 1>really didn't get many shares because it depended upon the situation.

0:24:08.800 --> 0:24:11.640
<v Speaker 1>Who I had, you know, first, as a conditional bid

0:24:11.720 --> 0:24:13.600
<v Speaker 1>that I mean starting pitching more, that I need to

0:24:13.680 --> 0:24:17.000
<v Speaker 1>hit her all that stuff. But he's somebody that I

0:24:17.080 --> 0:24:21.439
<v Speaker 1>would be wanting to require now on the cheap for

0:24:21.520 --> 0:24:24.800
<v Speaker 1>the possibility. That's really the way to do it in

0:24:25.119 --> 0:24:28.960
<v Speaker 1>obtaining shapes, get the guys before their name the closer. Yeah,

0:24:29.000 --> 0:24:31.159
<v Speaker 1>and and Florio brought this up to us yesterday when

0:24:31.160 --> 0:24:32.920
<v Speaker 1>we're kind of going through GSC and trying to figure

0:24:32.920 --> 0:24:34.320
<v Speaker 1>out who we want to bid on. Obviously, we have

0:24:34.400 --> 0:24:37.400
<v Speaker 1>the three man team, so we get perspectives from all over,

0:24:37.440 --> 0:24:39.840
<v Speaker 1>but he mentioned Nick Anderson as well, and rightfully so, Man,

0:24:40.000 --> 0:24:43.360
<v Speaker 1>I mean the cap for nine, uh, right around nineteen uh.

0:24:43.359 --> 0:24:46.200
<v Speaker 1>He's he's been awesome to this point. He's got sixteen strikeouts,

0:24:46.200 --> 0:24:49.040
<v Speaker 1>sixteen strikeouts in seven and two thirds endings. I mean,

0:24:49.320 --> 0:24:51.879
<v Speaker 1>the guy has just been absolutely ridiculous of swinging strike rate,

0:24:52.000 --> 0:24:54.919
<v Speaker 1>is up getting hitters to chase as well. He's predominantly

0:24:54.960 --> 0:24:57.959
<v Speaker 1>a fastball slider pitcher, but he's been the best reliever

0:24:58.040 --> 0:25:01.080
<v Speaker 1>in the Marlins pens start the year. So definitely definitely

0:25:01.080 --> 0:25:05.119
<v Speaker 1>a pathway to saving opportunities here or Nick and I

0:25:05.160 --> 0:25:06.879
<v Speaker 1>agree with that one. I had a few small bids

0:25:07.080 --> 0:25:10.640
<v Speaker 1>in on him. I had like a twelve eighteen dollar

0:25:10.720 --> 0:25:13.119
<v Speaker 1>bid in two different locations. He ended up going for

0:25:13.160 --> 0:25:15.080
<v Speaker 1>over seventy. I mean, I wasn't gonna do that that

0:25:15.080 --> 0:25:17.760
<v Speaker 1>that's very very aggressive in my opinion, but I do it.

0:25:17.800 --> 0:25:19.239
<v Speaker 1>Did have a few small bids, I didn't get them

0:25:19.240 --> 0:25:22.920
<v Speaker 1>anywhere though I didn't wasn't really a wirator. I guess

0:25:22.920 --> 0:25:25.159
<v Speaker 1>I'm not. I don't know. I think our leagues. I

0:25:25.160 --> 0:25:27.760
<v Speaker 1>don't feel overly desperate for saves at the moment. Maybe

0:25:27.800 --> 0:25:30.360
<v Speaker 1>that's where I'm at. So I haven't felt the needs

0:25:30.359 --> 0:25:32.000
<v Speaker 1>to go out and get him a name that we

0:25:32.040 --> 0:25:34.399
<v Speaker 1>have speculated on Frank, and we talked about him briefly

0:25:34.520 --> 0:25:36.160
<v Speaker 1>last week. We picked him up. You know, I think

0:25:36.359 --> 0:25:38.560
<v Speaker 1>g s T. We grabbed him and it was Eric

0:25:38.600 --> 0:25:41.480
<v Speaker 1>Thames or very very little and you talked about Matt

0:25:41.480 --> 0:25:44.040
<v Speaker 1>how last week you could have grabbed Hunter Doser for nothing.

0:25:44.400 --> 0:25:46.720
<v Speaker 1>That's basically when we grabbed Eric Thames for this week.

0:25:46.720 --> 0:25:49.560
<v Speaker 1>We cast this thirteen dollars and we saw last year

0:25:50.720 --> 0:25:53.840
<v Speaker 1>Hayes's Aguilar steal the job from Eric Thames and run

0:25:53.840 --> 0:25:56.840
<v Speaker 1>away with it. This year, has Aguilar has struggled out

0:25:56.880 --> 0:25:59.400
<v Speaker 1>of the gate, Is it possible that Eric Thames can

0:25:59.440 --> 0:26:03.159
<v Speaker 1>just get his job act, I mean it's a possibility.

0:26:03.200 --> 0:26:08.119
<v Speaker 1>I think they're gonna give uh Agilar a longer leash.

0:26:08.160 --> 0:26:10.800
<v Speaker 1>I mean, look, Thames would be really good if he

0:26:11.040 --> 0:26:14.919
<v Speaker 1>if he had an opportunity, you know, and was you know,

0:26:14.960 --> 0:26:18.720
<v Speaker 1>as that situational hitter, that matchup guy. We know the

0:26:18.760 --> 0:26:21.400
<v Speaker 1>power is real, you know, we know the power is real.

0:26:21.520 --> 0:26:24.720
<v Speaker 1>We know the balls juice. We know Miller Park, if fly,

0:26:24.960 --> 0:26:27.720
<v Speaker 1>you know, is a very hit or friendly park, so

0:26:28.680 --> 0:26:31.240
<v Speaker 1>you know, couldn't happen. Yes, But I think right, I

0:26:31.320 --> 0:26:34.040
<v Speaker 1>like the spec I like the way you're thinking on it.

0:26:34.400 --> 0:26:37.520
<v Speaker 1>But I think Aguilar has a longer leash, and I

0:26:37.560 --> 0:26:40.840
<v Speaker 1>think I agree with Matodika here. Uh we didn't mention

0:26:40.880 --> 0:26:42.760
<v Speaker 1>that we actually own Hayes Tolar in this league, so

0:26:42.760 --> 0:26:44.520
<v Speaker 1>we kind of wanted to lost town a little bit

0:26:44.560 --> 0:26:46.680
<v Speaker 1>and having both Brewers guys in case anything were to

0:26:46.720 --> 0:26:50.600
<v Speaker 1>happen to Aglar, who's been really unlucky to start the year.

0:26:50.640 --> 0:26:53.320
<v Speaker 1>I mean he's batting one fifty six. Has expected batting

0:26:53.359 --> 0:26:56.440
<v Speaker 1>average according to Baseball Savant two fifty two, which is

0:26:56.520 --> 0:26:58.120
<v Speaker 1>basically in the range that he was in last year.

0:26:58.119 --> 0:27:00.560
<v Speaker 1>He had a two fifty seven last year, striking out

0:27:00.600 --> 0:27:02.560
<v Speaker 1>a lot less. This season, he's walking more. This is

0:27:02.560 --> 0:27:05.680
<v Speaker 1>all hazers, Aglar, so, I think better days are coming.

0:27:05.720 --> 0:27:07.960
<v Speaker 1>And obviously, hitting in Miller Park, it's a great environment

0:27:07.960 --> 0:27:10.359
<v Speaker 1>to hid in. Um So, we basically just wanted to

0:27:10.400 --> 0:27:12.960
<v Speaker 1>lock down having both of these Brewers guys. But you know,

0:27:13.040 --> 0:27:16.359
<v Speaker 1>looking into Eric Thames, you know, there's a lot of

0:27:16.359 --> 0:27:17.960
<v Speaker 1>warning signs to me. He has like a forty eight

0:27:17.960 --> 0:27:20.520
<v Speaker 1>percent strikeout rate Greg um you know, and like a

0:27:20.560 --> 0:27:25.000
<v Speaker 1>sixty nine percent flyball right, So it basically two outcomes here,

0:27:25.119 --> 0:27:27.120
<v Speaker 1>strike out or just trying to hit a home run,

0:27:27.240 --> 0:27:28.680
<v Speaker 1>trying to lift the ball and hit a fly ball.

0:27:28.960 --> 0:27:30.760
<v Speaker 1>He's not walking, he has a zero percent of walker.

0:27:30.840 --> 0:27:32.320
<v Speaker 1>He doesn't have a walk rate. He doesn't have a

0:27:32.320 --> 0:27:34.800
<v Speaker 1>walk on the year. So this is basically just trying

0:27:34.800 --> 0:27:37.120
<v Speaker 1>to lock down both. But it's not like Eric Thames

0:27:37.160 --> 0:27:40.640
<v Speaker 1>has been that much better than no he he obviously hasn't.

0:27:40.920 --> 0:27:43.400
<v Speaker 1>I am happy in GST. We changed both our catchers out,

0:27:43.400 --> 0:27:47.360
<v Speaker 1>which was nice we get rid of Beefcatsto and who

0:27:47.359 --> 0:27:51.000
<v Speaker 1>else do we have? Um? It was we had, yeah, well,

0:27:51.080 --> 0:27:54.959
<v Speaker 1>Chris Ianeta, the Terrible Catchers. We dropped them both for

0:27:55.200 --> 0:27:58.720
<v Speaker 1>Josh Beagley and Christian Baskets. Who has hit today? Playing

0:27:58.800 --> 0:28:01.639
<v Speaker 1>second base? Today? Kid you not for the bus and

0:28:01.720 --> 0:28:04.480
<v Speaker 1>Red Sox. He's playing second and Blake's Whiteheart is catching.

0:28:04.760 --> 0:28:09.240
<v Speaker 1>Why I think they wanted to give dustin Majoria about

0:28:09.240 --> 0:28:13.920
<v Speaker 1>new yet off. I don't have anything, man, I don't

0:28:14.119 --> 0:28:18.359
<v Speaker 1>give me that baby. Well, we're never gonna use Christian

0:28:18.359 --> 0:28:22.159
<v Speaker 1>Baskets in the second base right now? Enough? All right?

0:28:22.520 --> 0:28:24.880
<v Speaker 1>I was interested that I thought Luis Eirias at three

0:28:24.880 --> 0:28:27.479
<v Speaker 1>bucks a very good bid in RS. Before we move

0:28:27.520 --> 0:28:30.000
<v Speaker 1>on from the Catches, I do want to ask Modica Matt,

0:28:30.040 --> 0:28:31.879
<v Speaker 1>were you in on Josh Familey anywhere? What have you

0:28:31.920 --> 0:28:34.240
<v Speaker 1>seen from him? Do you like the games he's made?

0:28:34.440 --> 0:28:36.680
<v Speaker 1>He's had some power, know in the minor leagues a

0:28:36.680 --> 0:28:38.960
<v Speaker 1>couple of years ago he hit like nineteen homers or

0:28:38.960 --> 0:28:41.120
<v Speaker 1>something like that, so he's got a little bit of power.

0:28:41.120 --> 0:28:42.640
<v Speaker 1>It's a good oakland A's line of two. Were you

0:28:42.680 --> 0:28:45.480
<v Speaker 1>in on Josh Fagley anywhere? I'm gonna put a couple

0:28:45.480 --> 0:28:48.000
<v Speaker 1>of small bids that really wasn't gonna know above like

0:28:48.520 --> 0:28:51.680
<v Speaker 1>a seven to eleven dollar range, was you know the

0:28:51.720 --> 0:28:56.720
<v Speaker 1>market I was paying for Fegley. Interestingly enough, Mitch Garber

0:28:56.880 --> 0:28:59.440
<v Speaker 1>was available in a couple of leagues. You weren't forty

0:28:59.760 --> 0:29:02.360
<v Speaker 1>dollars in one. I had a thirty one dollar bit

0:29:02.440 --> 0:29:06.600
<v Speaker 1>on that one missed out, got swyhearted another. But yeah, look,

0:29:06.640 --> 0:29:10.160
<v Speaker 1>if if you own like, uh, the Nick Hunley types

0:29:10.240 --> 0:29:12.160
<v Speaker 1>of the world and all that the ion net is

0:29:12.760 --> 0:29:15.640
<v Speaker 1>and Fagley was out there, I totally get being aggressive.

0:29:16.400 --> 0:29:18.640
<v Speaker 1>I got Josh Fagley for a thirty three bucks in

0:29:18.640 --> 0:29:23.520
<v Speaker 1>the main event. The next closest bid was it is

0:29:23.600 --> 0:29:28.320
<v Speaker 1>what it is, the second catcher. But it's about need.

0:29:28.560 --> 0:29:30.680
<v Speaker 1>It's about you know, you needed to catch or you

0:29:30.720 --> 0:29:34.680
<v Speaker 1>need to upgrade the position, and that thirty bucks it

0:29:34.800 --> 0:29:37.320
<v Speaker 1>could really it has worked it for you in my opinion,

0:29:37.560 --> 0:29:39.640
<v Speaker 1>to the guy that maybe really didn't need it and

0:29:39.720 --> 0:29:42.120
<v Speaker 1>only went three. Yeah, so I had Carson Kelly as

0:29:42.160 --> 0:29:45.280
<v Speaker 1>my as my second catcher, which very interesting situation for

0:29:45.360 --> 0:29:47.840
<v Speaker 1>the Diamondbacks, right, so they trade for Carson Kelly. I

0:29:47.920 --> 0:29:49.959
<v Speaker 1>thought he's gonna have the opportunity to play every day,

0:29:49.960 --> 0:29:52.160
<v Speaker 1>and even with Alex Villa going on the DL, Greg,

0:29:52.640 --> 0:29:54.239
<v Speaker 1>he's still not playing every day. I mean, John Ryan

0:29:54.280 --> 0:29:55.880
<v Speaker 1>Murphy is still getting a lot of playing time for

0:29:56.080 --> 0:29:58.440
<v Speaker 1>four the Diamondbacks. So I ended up dropping him. I

0:29:58.480 --> 0:30:00.840
<v Speaker 1>picked up Fegley for it was actual thirty two bucks.

0:30:01.400 --> 0:30:03.280
<v Speaker 1>But yeah, I mean he's performed well. The hard hit

0:30:03.360 --> 0:30:06.600
<v Speaker 1>rate is up. I mean well at the Oakland A's

0:30:06.960 --> 0:30:09.320
<v Speaker 1>lineup is a very deep one too. It's not the

0:30:09.360 --> 0:30:12.160
<v Speaker 1>best hitting environment. But you know, I get him as

0:30:12.240 --> 0:30:14.520
<v Speaker 1>my second casher. I'm fine with that. I also I

0:30:14.600 --> 0:30:17.480
<v Speaker 1>picked up Chris Davis. Let you see, for eight bucks.

0:30:17.760 --> 0:30:21.360
<v Speaker 1>He's my utility player. I'm hoping that I kipt lightning

0:30:21.400 --> 0:30:24.360
<v Speaker 1>in a bottle here. Greg, it's just a hot weekend.

0:30:24.520 --> 0:30:27.520
<v Speaker 1>It's a small model, man, if you can cash it,

0:30:27.680 --> 0:30:30.400
<v Speaker 1>Oh my god, I did one hundred dozer. I was

0:30:30.480 --> 0:30:32.840
<v Speaker 1>in a Dan Vogel box was available in our in

0:30:32.920 --> 0:30:35.120
<v Speaker 1>our main event, he goes for four hundred and forty

0:30:35.160 --> 0:30:37.640
<v Speaker 1>four dollars. I think I had a hundred and thirteen

0:30:37.680 --> 0:30:40.080
<v Speaker 1>dollar bid. I wasn't expecting to get him. I figured

0:30:40.120 --> 0:30:42.080
<v Speaker 1>someone was gonna be much more aggressive, and rightfully so.

0:30:42.280 --> 0:30:43.960
<v Speaker 1>But he went for a four forty four. The next

0:30:43.960 --> 0:30:46.959
<v Speaker 1>closest bid was one seventy one, So you know, put

0:30:47.000 --> 0:30:49.360
<v Speaker 1>that in perspective. But Matt, you know, has has referenced

0:30:49.360 --> 0:30:50.720
<v Speaker 1>that you want to get your guys, you really want

0:30:50.800 --> 0:30:52.360
<v Speaker 1>vogel Box, you gotta spend up to get him. So

0:30:52.880 --> 0:30:54.560
<v Speaker 1>that's what someone did in our main event. You know,

0:30:54.640 --> 0:30:57.400
<v Speaker 1>I wasn't. I was one willing to give up, work

0:30:57.480 --> 0:31:00.720
<v Speaker 1>up a third or two fifths of my fab budget

0:31:00.800 --> 0:31:03.920
<v Speaker 1>left for for Dan Volga. He was really the he

0:31:04.040 --> 0:31:06.080
<v Speaker 1>was the top guy if he was still available, I

0:31:06.160 --> 0:31:08.480
<v Speaker 1>thought so too, and Vogle Black and whether Clint Frasier

0:31:08.520 --> 0:31:09.680
<v Speaker 1>was still out there as well. I know that was

0:31:09.720 --> 0:31:15.000
<v Speaker 1>suber aggressive on him. Uh last week, Um, trying to

0:31:15.040 --> 0:31:18.800
<v Speaker 1>go through the g d D League. Now, Frank and

0:31:18.880 --> 0:31:21.120
<v Speaker 1>go over some of the big waiver wire guys here

0:31:22.240 --> 0:31:26.120
<v Speaker 1>and see who went. What do you make Matt Oh,

0:31:26.320 --> 0:31:28.400
<v Speaker 1>I've seen him picking a cold places. Adam Wayne right,

0:31:28.480 --> 0:31:30.320
<v Speaker 1>I know he's ugly the first star, it's gotten better

0:31:30.400 --> 0:31:32.040
<v Speaker 1>the back next to what do you think of him?

0:31:33.560 --> 0:31:35.720
<v Speaker 1>I do have him on a couple of teams. There

0:31:36.000 --> 0:31:38.600
<v Speaker 1>was a couple of thirty round selections. On the twenty

0:31:38.720 --> 0:31:42.160
<v Speaker 1>ninth round. Uh, he's off of one and I do

0:31:42.360 --> 0:31:45.280
<v Speaker 1>think I have him on two others still. I think

0:31:45.400 --> 0:31:51.080
<v Speaker 1>right now he is you know, border borderline roster bull

0:31:51.280 --> 0:31:54.800
<v Speaker 1>and depended upon you know what the matchup is and stuff,

0:31:55.680 --> 0:31:58.560
<v Speaker 1>you can roll him out there. I mean, I see

0:31:58.640 --> 0:32:01.800
<v Speaker 1>people excited about like Jorge Lopez. I'll start Adam Wayne

0:32:01.880 --> 0:32:03.480
<v Speaker 1>right over him. Every Yeah, every day. Well you're the

0:32:03.520 --> 0:32:06.680
<v Speaker 1>Jorge Lopez guy, right, you excited about Joregal Lopez. Yeah,

0:32:07.040 --> 0:32:09.280
<v Speaker 1>mild excitement here for Jorge Lopez, who has a two

0:32:09.320 --> 0:32:10.960
<v Speaker 1>star week this week. He's going up against the White

0:32:11.000 --> 0:32:14.680
<v Speaker 1>Sox and the Yankees. And I mentioned that the underlying skills,

0:32:14.720 --> 0:32:17.840
<v Speaker 1>the swinging strike rate, it's a little bit over league average. Look,

0:32:17.880 --> 0:32:19.920
<v Speaker 1>he's not blowing anyone away. The case for nine are

0:32:19.920 --> 0:32:21.600
<v Speaker 1>not great, the walks for nine haven't been great, but

0:32:22.120 --> 0:32:24.280
<v Speaker 1>I think the arsenal is decent. He throws like an

0:32:24.320 --> 0:32:26.800
<v Speaker 1>eighty seven mile per hour slider and the whiff rate

0:32:26.880 --> 0:32:29.320
<v Speaker 1>is actually up on that. He did have prospect pedigree

0:32:29.320 --> 0:32:31.760
<v Speaker 1>in the past. He was a top pitching pitching prospect

0:32:31.800 --> 0:32:33.760
<v Speaker 1>for the Brewers a couple of years ago. But he's

0:32:33.800 --> 0:32:36.239
<v Speaker 1>bounced around. He hasn't he hasn't been great until now,

0:32:36.320 --> 0:32:38.600
<v Speaker 1>he's been all right. So in deeper leagues, you know,

0:32:38.640 --> 0:32:41.200
<v Speaker 1>as a two star pitcher, I was looking into him,

0:32:41.640 --> 0:32:44.440
<v Speaker 1>Adam Wayne Right. I just don't know what he offers

0:32:44.680 --> 0:32:46.400
<v Speaker 1>at this point, right, like he's probably gonna have like

0:32:46.480 --> 0:32:48.720
<v Speaker 1>a low four's e r ray. I agree with Matt

0:32:48.800 --> 0:32:50.680
<v Speaker 1>that maybe in the right matchup you can stream him,

0:32:51.240 --> 0:32:53.440
<v Speaker 1>but me personally, I'll go the other way. I know

0:32:53.520 --> 0:32:56.040
<v Speaker 1>Matt said he would use Wayne right over Lopez. Um,

0:32:56.240 --> 0:32:58.280
<v Speaker 1>I'm I'm a little intrigued by Jorge Lopez. So I

0:32:58.280 --> 0:32:59.520
<v Speaker 1>want to see what he does this week. I don't

0:32:59.560 --> 0:33:01.880
<v Speaker 1>know if I, you know, technically throw him in there

0:33:01.960 --> 0:33:03.400
<v Speaker 1>right away, but I did pick him up in a

0:33:03.480 --> 0:33:05.920
<v Speaker 1>few deeper leagues as a speculative bad just to see

0:33:06.000 --> 0:33:07.800
<v Speaker 1>if there's anything here with him. You know, when he

0:33:07.840 --> 0:33:10.080
<v Speaker 1>pitches at home in Kansas City, it's a good ballpark,

0:33:10.560 --> 0:33:13.000
<v Speaker 1>and he did have some pedigree, So I have some

0:33:13.160 --> 0:33:15.280
<v Speaker 1>interest in Jorge Lopez. Two more names I wanted to

0:33:15.320 --> 0:33:17.400
<v Speaker 1>bring up to you, Matt before we hit the break here.

0:33:17.440 --> 0:33:20.920
<v Speaker 1>That's Hunter Renfro for San Diego. Inside our gd D

0:33:21.200 --> 0:33:24.920
<v Speaker 1>he went for sixteen bucks out of a hundred. The

0:33:25.040 --> 0:33:27.800
<v Speaker 1>question really isn't about run for his talents, but that

0:33:27.880 --> 0:33:30.640
<v Speaker 1>playing time, but the injuries in San Diego, he could

0:33:30.680 --> 0:33:33.600
<v Speaker 1>play every day and we know the powers there. Yeah,

0:33:33.680 --> 0:33:36.680
<v Speaker 1>I will. I think sixteen dollars is a fair bid.

0:33:36.920 --> 0:33:40.080
<v Speaker 1>I want to own him or Fran mill Rays. Like

0:33:40.200 --> 0:33:43.080
<v Speaker 1>you said, it's just about the opportunity of playing time.

0:33:43.440 --> 0:33:45.520
<v Speaker 1>Can they get it? You know, you know it's look

0:33:45.600 --> 0:33:49.120
<v Speaker 1>where three weeks into the season, not even and you

0:33:49.200 --> 0:33:51.360
<v Speaker 1>know maybe there's gonna be some trades down the road

0:33:51.440 --> 0:33:54.480
<v Speaker 1>to Uh, Fran mill Rays was available one of my

0:33:54.680 --> 0:33:59.040
<v Speaker 1>really big leagues, and I did like nine on him,

0:33:59.640 --> 0:34:02.360
<v Speaker 1>not really needing the outfielder there, but I wanted the

0:34:02.480 --> 0:34:06.720
<v Speaker 1>talent and he went for over. Like, yeah, I'm with

0:34:06.800 --> 0:34:09.080
<v Speaker 1>you on friend Milrays too. I tweeted this out yesterday

0:34:09.120 --> 0:34:12.920
<v Speaker 1>Greg Drink regarding the hitters who have the biggest difference

0:34:12.960 --> 0:34:15.600
<v Speaker 1>between their batting average and expected batting average who start

0:34:15.680 --> 0:34:18.640
<v Speaker 1>the season. Friend Milrays was the top one heading into

0:34:18.800 --> 0:34:23.160
<v Speaker 1>yesterday's Action batting average and a three forty nine expected

0:34:23.200 --> 0:34:26.200
<v Speaker 1>batting average. So better days are coming for him. Uh,

0:34:26.920 --> 0:34:28.719
<v Speaker 1>you know, he's He's played a lot of the time,

0:34:28.840 --> 0:34:30.960
<v Speaker 1>the majority of the time this year for the San

0:34:31.040 --> 0:34:34.359
<v Speaker 1>Diego Padres. They're trying to get creative. Manuel Margot another one.

0:34:34.400 --> 0:34:36.160
<v Speaker 1>If he was available in twelve team leagues, I would

0:34:36.160 --> 0:34:38.239
<v Speaker 1>say go out there and be aggressive on him. He's

0:34:38.239 --> 0:34:40.360
<v Speaker 1>off to a solid start this season, and he hit

0:34:40.400 --> 0:34:42.840
<v Speaker 1>his second home run yesterday, a leadoff home run against

0:34:42.880 --> 0:34:46.000
<v Speaker 1>Zack Frankie. But has an interesting power speed combination. People

0:34:46.000 --> 0:34:48.040
<v Speaker 1>are so ready to write off Manuel Marco. The guy

0:34:48.080 --> 0:34:50.640
<v Speaker 1>is still only twenty four years old, Greg, so you know,

0:34:50.719 --> 0:34:54.480
<v Speaker 1>he's been playing every game since April seven, he's been

0:34:54.520 --> 0:34:56.200
<v Speaker 1>in the line up. They're giving him an opportunity. So

0:34:56.960 --> 0:34:58.839
<v Speaker 1>I like this padres outfield, and I think a lot

0:34:58.880 --> 0:35:01.279
<v Speaker 1>of people did with you. Were worried about the playing time.

0:35:01.400 --> 0:35:03.719
<v Speaker 1>But now you eliminate one guy with Frankie Cordero who

0:35:03.719 --> 0:35:06.000
<v Speaker 1>went on the I l and you know, things start

0:35:06.080 --> 0:35:08.200
<v Speaker 1>to work themselves out a little a little bit here.

0:35:08.320 --> 0:35:11.279
<v Speaker 1>So if Marco or friend Murrays were available, I would

0:35:11.280 --> 0:35:13.319
<v Speaker 1>I would be very aggressive on either one. I very

0:35:13.400 --> 0:35:16.640
<v Speaker 1>much agree I. I was with you a few weeks ago,

0:35:16.719 --> 0:35:18.359
<v Speaker 1>and anymore go then I wanted to take a shot

0:35:18.400 --> 0:35:20.160
<v Speaker 1>on him. If he can find the playing time, playing

0:35:20.200 --> 0:35:22.400
<v Speaker 1>times there, uh, he won't probably cost as much as

0:35:22.400 --> 0:35:24.000
<v Speaker 1>a guy like Hunter Renfro. So that's why I like

0:35:24.200 --> 0:35:27.239
<v Speaker 1>Manuel Margot if he's out there. One more name before

0:35:27.280 --> 0:35:30.400
<v Speaker 1>the break, Matt, and that's Miss Morland, who hits in

0:35:30.400 --> 0:35:32.200
<v Speaker 1>the middle of that Red Sox order. There's always the

0:35:32.200 --> 0:35:34.560
<v Speaker 1>time every year where I feel like I'm after Moreland. Uh,

0:35:34.640 --> 0:35:36.720
<v Speaker 1>it's earlier rather than later. Now he went for about

0:35:36.760 --> 0:35:39.719
<v Speaker 1>eight dollars to our guy Ian Coln inside the g

0:35:39.920 --> 0:35:43.520
<v Speaker 1>D League. Are you in on Miss Moreland? Yeah, for

0:35:43.840 --> 0:35:46.720
<v Speaker 1>things you said, He's hits in the heart of that lineup.

0:35:47.040 --> 0:35:49.520
<v Speaker 1>He's on the strong side of the platoon. I have

0:35:49.719 --> 0:35:52.920
<v Speaker 1>him on a couple of teams, another guy like you know,

0:35:53.160 --> 0:35:56.560
<v Speaker 1>late twenties, thirties round draft pick or you could get

0:35:56.760 --> 0:36:01.320
<v Speaker 1>on waivers for nothing. So look, he's got power, we

0:36:01.440 --> 0:36:05.360
<v Speaker 1>know that. And that lineup. Look, the Red Shocks are

0:36:05.400 --> 0:36:07.279
<v Speaker 1>gonna get hot. The Red Shocks are not a you know,

0:36:07.520 --> 0:36:10.640
<v Speaker 1>three intent team or whatever the hell they are. No,

0:36:10.800 --> 0:36:12.799
<v Speaker 1>they're not. They're not a three intent team, and they'll

0:36:13.000 --> 0:36:16.200
<v Speaker 1>certainly get hot. Probably the Yankees this week, Frank, Yeah, rightfully,

0:36:16.320 --> 0:36:18.800
<v Speaker 1>so with the with the pictures that there, the Yankees

0:36:18.840 --> 0:36:20.920
<v Speaker 1>are throwing out there right now, just can't do anything right.

0:36:21.000 --> 0:36:24.080
<v Speaker 1>But regarding Mitch Moreland, look, he's batting third in the

0:36:24.120 --> 0:36:27.200
<v Speaker 1>Red Sox lineup, he's already got five homers. You know,

0:36:27.440 --> 0:36:29.080
<v Speaker 1>like if you started him for any of that, like

0:36:29.160 --> 0:36:31.000
<v Speaker 1>you feel great about it. Maybe he doesn't play against

0:36:31.040 --> 0:36:33.759
<v Speaker 1>left handed pitching every single time, but you know what,

0:36:33.840 --> 0:36:35.520
<v Speaker 1>he's gonna give you between a two fifty and two

0:36:35.560 --> 0:36:38.319
<v Speaker 1>sixty bantning average right around there. He's got a little

0:36:38.360 --> 0:36:40.480
<v Speaker 1>bit of pop. The r B I S can certainly

0:36:40.520 --> 0:36:42.160
<v Speaker 1>help you out as long as he plays and he's

0:36:42.160 --> 0:36:44.480
<v Speaker 1>batting third. I thought it was interesting for the Red

0:36:44.560 --> 0:36:46.520
<v Speaker 1>Sox early on in the season they were trying out

0:36:46.600 --> 0:36:49.239
<v Speaker 1>Rafie Devers adding third, and what do you know, a

0:36:49.280 --> 0:36:51.120
<v Speaker 1>couple of weeks into the season, they're already pushing him

0:36:51.120 --> 0:36:53.279
<v Speaker 1>down to bat six. So it's like, why would you

0:36:53.320 --> 0:36:55.160
<v Speaker 1>try something all spring and and give a guy a shot?

0:36:55.239 --> 0:36:56.759
<v Speaker 1>And it's like, I know they're getting off to a

0:36:56.800 --> 0:36:59.279
<v Speaker 1>slow start, but you just you don't really give him

0:36:59.280 --> 0:37:02.000
<v Speaker 1>time to work through it. So it's interesting. Look, yeah,

0:37:02.040 --> 0:37:03.600
<v Speaker 1>as long as Mitch Moore and petting third for the

0:37:03.680 --> 0:37:07.400
<v Speaker 1>Red Sox, the perfectly fine corner infielder utility, you've got

0:37:07.400 --> 0:37:09.040
<v Speaker 1>a little bit of pop definitely helps with the RVF.

0:37:09.120 --> 0:37:11.200
<v Speaker 1>Al right's he good break when we come back, we'll

0:37:11.200 --> 0:37:13.640
<v Speaker 1>go over some to start pitchers with that Modiga here

0:37:14.040 --> 0:37:17.520
<v Speaker 1>and we'll break down the week with the Elemo five

0:37:17.560 --> 0:37:19.920
<v Speaker 1>game on Patriots Day of Boston. If not, we'll give

0:37:19.960 --> 0:37:21.600
<v Speaker 1>it two star pitchers and let you know what we think.

0:37:21.680 --> 0:37:24.000
<v Speaker 1>It's Fantasy best Friends forever on the Fantasy Sports right

0:37:24.000 --> 0:37:32.680
<v Speaker 1>your network. The Fantasy Sports Network is ready to take

0:37:32.719 --> 0:37:35.240
<v Speaker 1>you out to the ball game. Our experts and analysts

0:37:35.239 --> 0:37:37.680
<v Speaker 1>are following the Boys of Summer through all one and

0:37:37.760 --> 0:37:40.080
<v Speaker 1>six and two games. Talk the two thousand nine MLB

0:37:40.200 --> 0:37:43.440
<v Speaker 1>season with the best fantasy baseball analysis in the industry.

0:37:43.520 --> 0:37:45.520
<v Speaker 1>Catch the latest news and notes every day to help

0:37:45.560 --> 0:37:48.560
<v Speaker 1>you win your fantasy leagues and Georgia Best Tournaments. Will

0:37:48.680 --> 0:37:51.440
<v Speaker 1>always want you back listening and watching the Fantasy Sports

0:37:51.480 --> 0:37:53.319
<v Speaker 1>Network on the f and T s Y Radio app

0:37:53.400 --> 0:37:55.279
<v Speaker 1>and the f N T s Y YouTube channel. The

0:37:55.400 --> 0:37:58.600
<v Speaker 1>Fantasy Sports Network where we're root root rooting for your

0:37:58.719 --> 0:38:03.200
<v Speaker 1>fantasy baseball team. Yah Maurice Allen two thousand and fifteen,

0:38:03.239 --> 0:38:06.520
<v Speaker 1>two thousands and sixteen European Long Drive Tour Champion, two

0:38:06.600 --> 0:38:14.480
<v Speaker 1>thousand seventeen World Number one Me personally, I keep my

0:38:14.560 --> 0:38:20.120
<v Speaker 1>game face on me all the time, especially coming out

0:38:20.160 --> 0:38:23.960
<v Speaker 1>with the bucker leaving the range or even leaving the poorts.

0:38:25.600 --> 0:38:28.200
<v Speaker 1>What's your story? Go to game face, grouping dot com

0:38:28.280 --> 0:38:30.840
<v Speaker 1>from all your athletic facial wipes and body cleansing needs

0:38:33.480 --> 0:38:36.440
<v Speaker 1>Scout Fantasy Sports. I'm a big Mets fan and I

0:38:36.760 --> 0:38:39.279
<v Speaker 1>killed them a lot. Sometimes I'm kind of more on

0:38:39.400 --> 0:38:42.000
<v Speaker 1>the pessimistic side. But but for them to keep Alonzo

0:38:42.080 --> 0:38:44.160
<v Speaker 1>on this roster and immediately hit him at the tuer

0:38:44.200 --> 0:38:46.960
<v Speaker 1>spot in day one has been huge. I mean, you laugh,

0:38:47.040 --> 0:38:48.719
<v Speaker 1>It could be a difference maker down the stretch. Could

0:38:48.719 --> 0:38:50.440
<v Speaker 1>you imagine they didn't have Alonso in the lineup now

0:38:50.680 --> 0:38:52.480
<v Speaker 1>and he was in the minor leagues putting up the

0:38:52.560 --> 0:38:54.520
<v Speaker 1>numbers he's doing now in the minor league. I mean,

0:38:54.560 --> 0:38:57.000
<v Speaker 1>he's helped the Mets win some games weekdays to the

0:38:57.040 --> 0:38:59.120
<v Speaker 1>four pm Easter and on the Fantasy Sports Network and

0:38:59.160 --> 0:39:02.360
<v Speaker 1>on your popular cast providers can't get enough fantasy football.

0:39:02.560 --> 0:39:06.480
<v Speaker 1>Rhoto Experts has launched their NFL three Fantasy Football package,

0:39:06.480 --> 0:39:09.560
<v Speaker 1>which includes the best math based seasonal projections and rankings

0:39:09.600 --> 0:39:12.920
<v Speaker 1>available anywhere on the Internet. Davis Madigan the Roto Experts

0:39:12.960 --> 0:39:16.320
<v Speaker 1>are providing dynasty season long betting, best Ball and NFL

0:39:16.440 --> 0:39:18.440
<v Speaker 1>Draft content every day of the year to give you

0:39:18.520 --> 0:39:21.359
<v Speaker 1>an edge regardless of what type of fantasy football you play.

0:39:21.560 --> 0:39:24.080
<v Speaker 1>Say Timber sent a Roperts dot com with the promo

0:39:24.160 --> 0:39:26.560
<v Speaker 1>code V and T s y It's the NFL three

0:39:27.239 --> 0:39:41.360
<v Speaker 1>Fantasy Football package only at rhoto Experts dot com. The

0:39:41.600 --> 0:39:46.240
<v Speaker 1>Boston Marathon almost just had like a photo finish. It's crazy.

0:39:47.280 --> 0:39:51.160
<v Speaker 1>Two guys back to back winning it all. Super impressive.

0:39:53.080 --> 0:39:55.480
<v Speaker 1>Are they? I don't know who they? I don't know,

0:39:55.480 --> 0:40:03.160
<v Speaker 1>I don't know them, but cool, I thought, Um, all right,

0:40:03.560 --> 0:40:07.080
<v Speaker 1>take your tax refund and swim the fences. Playing DFS baseball,

0:40:07.120 --> 0:40:09.200
<v Speaker 1>you gotta get a tax refund order to swim defences.

0:40:09.320 --> 0:40:12.279
<v Speaker 1>When Daily Rotor dot com become the eighth Daily Road

0:40:12.280 --> 0:40:15.040
<v Speaker 1>to a lot of optimizer user to a million dollars

0:40:15.080 --> 0:40:17.319
<v Speaker 1>on fandel or draft Kings in a tournament, or become

0:40:17.320 --> 0:40:19.279
<v Speaker 1>one of the countless number of people who have won

0:40:19.360 --> 0:40:25.120
<v Speaker 1>thousands using Now anybody mb using the Daily Road tell

0:40:25.120 --> 0:40:27.839
<v Speaker 1>you optimizer. If you're playing MLB dfs and not using

0:40:27.880 --> 0:40:30.000
<v Speaker 1>Daily Order dot Com, you're doing it wrong. Enter the

0:40:30.040 --> 0:40:32.200
<v Speaker 1>promo code F and T S Wyford Temper said, discount

0:40:32.200 --> 0:40:34.400
<v Speaker 1>and you'll get a lot of let's projected ownership percentages,

0:40:34.560 --> 0:40:38.399
<v Speaker 1>whether updates, fantasy projections, the that all use Daily Road

0:40:38.400 --> 0:40:41.280
<v Speaker 1>to a lot of optimizers because they've produced not just thousands,

0:40:41.480 --> 0:40:45.160
<v Speaker 1>but millions of dollars in DFS winnings. It's twenty nineteen

0:40:45.280 --> 0:40:47.880
<v Speaker 1>lb Daily Rodo Premium package, Daily Order dot Com. Use

0:40:47.960 --> 0:40:50.319
<v Speaker 1>promo code fnc s Y and get your temper cent

0:40:50.400 --> 0:40:52.880
<v Speaker 1>discount today. All right, Matt, I know there's a name

0:40:52.920 --> 0:40:54.520
<v Speaker 1>that Frank wanted to ask you about. You grabbed in

0:40:54.560 --> 0:40:56.800
<v Speaker 1>the main event, and that was my man from Miami,

0:40:57.520 --> 0:41:05.239
<v Speaker 1>Austin Howard Dean. What were you thinking? Uh, he was

0:41:05.320 --> 0:41:08.520
<v Speaker 1>probably a thig third on my list, So you know

0:41:08.840 --> 0:41:11.719
<v Speaker 1>you have conditional bids after your top bid. He's gonna

0:41:11.719 --> 0:41:15.319
<v Speaker 1>be playing every day, they called him up. Uh, you'll

0:41:15.360 --> 0:41:19.880
<v Speaker 1>have a spot and in fifteen team leagues, guys that

0:41:19.960 --> 0:41:23.640
<v Speaker 1>will have at bats in a good part of the order. Eventually.

0:41:23.719 --> 0:41:26.520
<v Speaker 1>I don't see him, you know, batting in the bottom

0:41:26.600 --> 0:41:28.520
<v Speaker 1>end of that lineup all year. I don't see that

0:41:28.719 --> 0:41:32.560
<v Speaker 1>as the possibility. So for what is it four percent

0:41:32.719 --> 0:41:35.800
<v Speaker 1>or so to take a shot missed out of my

0:41:35.920 --> 0:41:39.440
<v Speaker 1>other two options. Uh, So you know, we'll see what

0:41:39.520 --> 0:41:42.080
<v Speaker 1>happens there. It's funny. I actually watched a lot of

0:41:42.120 --> 0:41:44.840
<v Speaker 1>Austin Dean oddly this weekend, Frankie, because I was in

0:41:44.920 --> 0:41:47.600
<v Speaker 1>Philly and the Marlins were playing Film Get Crushed, and

0:41:48.239 --> 0:41:51.480
<v Speaker 1>I was watching Zac Get crossed. Yes, yes, yes, I was,

0:41:52.160 --> 0:41:54.640
<v Speaker 1>um and Austin Deine give me the every day right

0:41:54.680 --> 0:41:56.840
<v Speaker 1>field with this. Isn't Peter O'Brien down, not right on her?

0:41:57.000 --> 0:42:00.040
<v Speaker 1>Doesn't Peter O'Brien down. And Austin Dean's get all of

0:42:00.080 --> 0:42:02.279
<v Speaker 1>playing time that there in Miami, and they don't really

0:42:02.360 --> 0:42:05.200
<v Speaker 1>hit all that much. But deems to me part of

0:42:05.239 --> 0:42:07.600
<v Speaker 1>the middle of it, so we'll see. He's a deeper

0:42:07.640 --> 0:42:09.279
<v Speaker 1>league ad. I don't have any problems with him in

0:42:09.320 --> 0:42:12.000
<v Speaker 1>fifteen teamers obviously, and only anyone who has a job

0:42:12.040 --> 0:42:14.520
<v Speaker 1>should be owned. He's got a tweety one career batting

0:42:14.560 --> 0:42:16.600
<v Speaker 1>average in the minors. He was hitting three seventy five

0:42:16.680 --> 0:42:19.920
<v Speaker 1>this year. You get three forty five with p s

0:42:20.040 --> 0:42:22.560
<v Speaker 1>last year in the minors between double A and triple A.

0:42:22.719 --> 0:42:25.200
<v Speaker 1>So I think if you're picking them up, you're really

0:42:25.440 --> 0:42:27.719
<v Speaker 1>banking on the batting average here plays in the big park,

0:42:27.840 --> 0:42:30.440
<v Speaker 1>but maybe a lot of those turned into uh, get

0:42:30.480 --> 0:42:32.040
<v Speaker 1>a lot of gap shots. Get a lot of doubles

0:42:32.080 --> 0:42:35.280
<v Speaker 1>out of Austin Dean. Only twelve homers and two stone bases,

0:42:35.400 --> 0:42:38.359
<v Speaker 1>so modest pop. But I think what you really wanted

0:42:38.360 --> 0:42:39.640
<v Speaker 1>to him is batting average and in the fact that

0:42:39.640 --> 0:42:41.480
<v Speaker 1>he's gonna play every day, Greg, I don't have a

0:42:41.480 --> 0:42:43.480
<v Speaker 1>problem with int deep believe. Okay, So there you go

0:42:43.760 --> 0:42:45.680
<v Speaker 1>with Austin Dean. Let's get into some of the two

0:42:45.719 --> 0:42:48.600
<v Speaker 1>start pitchers for this we hopefully your ladders have not

0:42:48.719 --> 0:42:51.799
<v Speaker 1>locked yet. If you go by the gate, the team

0:42:51.960 --> 0:42:53.879
<v Speaker 1>that plays not just the first game of the day.

0:42:54.120 --> 0:42:57.200
<v Speaker 1>I want to begin with Nick Pavetta, who many people

0:42:57.200 --> 0:42:59.279
<v Speaker 1>were high on coming into this year. Matt the then

0:42:59.360 --> 0:43:02.239
<v Speaker 1>I faces the men and he's in Colorado. Certainly two starts.

0:43:02.280 --> 0:43:06.719
<v Speaker 1>You're not exactly thrilled about. You gonna start Prevent this week. No,

0:43:08.560 --> 0:43:10.759
<v Speaker 1>I will not be starting Nick Pivetta this week. I

0:43:10.840 --> 0:43:13.800
<v Speaker 1>highlighted into my article over at the Athletic yesterday. I

0:43:13.880 --> 0:43:17.480
<v Speaker 1>did two start pictures every week. And look, I'm not

0:43:17.600 --> 0:43:20.160
<v Speaker 1>cutting him in any twelve or fifteen leagues. I mean

0:43:20.200 --> 0:43:23.040
<v Speaker 1>definitely not fifteen, And even in the twelve. If you

0:43:23.200 --> 0:43:26.400
<v Speaker 1>had believed in him prior, you gotta give him more

0:43:26.440 --> 0:43:29.120
<v Speaker 1>than three starts. I did a tweet last week on

0:43:29.320 --> 0:43:33.000
<v Speaker 1>Louis Castillo, Zach Wheeler and after get the third Jamison

0:43:33.080 --> 0:43:36.080
<v Speaker 1>Tye on you know after their first month, what they

0:43:36.120 --> 0:43:39.280
<v Speaker 1>were able to do rest of the season. Granted, Provetta

0:43:39.400 --> 0:43:42.839
<v Speaker 1>has not looked good the Phillies radio broadcast, which I'm

0:43:42.840 --> 0:43:45.480
<v Speaker 1>becoming a real good fan of. Uh they said it

0:43:45.600 --> 0:43:47.680
<v Speaker 1>best and it's been the theme early on. Provetta did

0:43:47.719 --> 0:43:51.200
<v Speaker 1>not bring his swing and miss stuff. He almost salvaged

0:43:51.840 --> 0:43:54.919
<v Speaker 1>that start on whatever the middle of the week last

0:43:54.920 --> 0:43:57.400
<v Speaker 1>week where he went up getting dreamed. But when you

0:43:57.440 --> 0:43:59.760
<v Speaker 1>give a pitch to the picture, you know, Jeremy Hellison

0:43:59.840 --> 0:44:01.840
<v Speaker 1>k get a hit off of you, you could have

0:44:01.880 --> 0:44:03.800
<v Speaker 1>had a one to three inning. It turned into you know,

0:44:04.040 --> 0:44:07.000
<v Speaker 1>a four run any or more. So I think there's

0:44:07.040 --> 0:44:09.840
<v Speaker 1>talent there. I'm not bailing on it. Look at the

0:44:09.920 --> 0:44:12.120
<v Speaker 1>state of pitching, you know, the further you go down,

0:44:12.160 --> 0:44:15.439
<v Speaker 1>look at these guys you're streaming. One week, everybody loves

0:44:15.480 --> 0:44:19.799
<v Speaker 1>Spencer Turnbull, then they don't love him. So I think

0:44:19.840 --> 0:44:22.440
<v Speaker 1>you got a better on talent from now. Let it

0:44:22.600 --> 0:44:28.040
<v Speaker 1>win out and go from there. It's one thing I

0:44:28.080 --> 0:44:31.320
<v Speaker 1>don't actually love to fill his radio broadcasting because I thought, like,

0:44:31.480 --> 0:44:34.720
<v Speaker 1>way too horsh for me. It's like every radio broadcast

0:44:34.840 --> 0:44:38.320
<v Speaker 1>is home erge. I don't disagree with at least what

0:44:38.360 --> 0:44:40.480
<v Speaker 1>I was listening. They weren't pulling any punches. Oh I was.

0:44:40.920 --> 0:44:43.000
<v Speaker 1>I did not like it. Like I was listening actually

0:44:43.160 --> 0:44:46.279
<v Speaker 1>all into the train yesterday, and the color guy was

0:44:46.360 --> 0:44:48.400
<v Speaker 1>just like, oh, I got a really good feeling I got.

0:44:48.520 --> 0:44:50.359
<v Speaker 1>I got a good feeling about Gene. You got good

0:44:50.400 --> 0:44:53.320
<v Speaker 1>at bath here against it was like, what is that

0:44:53.480 --> 0:44:55.359
<v Speaker 1>he goes? Let the stats say that. I'm just telling

0:44:55.360 --> 0:44:57.319
<v Speaker 1>you my feeling about Gene. Jean's gonna end it right

0:44:57.360 --> 0:45:00.640
<v Speaker 1>here like this is weird. I was that the event

0:45:00.719 --> 0:45:02.879
<v Speaker 1>that he actually hit the home run now even cool.

0:45:03.200 --> 0:45:05.200
<v Speaker 1>I didn't know he he and he. I didn't know

0:45:05.280 --> 0:45:08.520
<v Speaker 1>that years. Oh that's so funny. No, no, no, no,

0:45:08.680 --> 0:45:12.920
<v Speaker 1>it was not a batter two before that. Yeah, we

0:45:13.000 --> 0:45:15.720
<v Speaker 1>had a feeling. Was a little later regarding Nick Pavetta

0:45:15.960 --> 0:45:18.560
<v Speaker 1>fifteen team leagues, I agree. I I can't cut him there.

0:45:19.160 --> 0:45:20.840
<v Speaker 1>I don't want to cut him after three starts in

0:45:20.840 --> 0:45:22.359
<v Speaker 1>a twelve team league. I'm just saying it's a little

0:45:22.360 --> 0:45:23.719
<v Speaker 1>bit tougher there because you see a lot of these

0:45:23.800 --> 0:45:26.279
<v Speaker 1>guys were performing on the waiver wire and and you

0:45:26.320 --> 0:45:28.120
<v Speaker 1>want to pick him up. I think it's a little

0:45:28.120 --> 0:45:30.640
<v Speaker 1>bit harder. Um. I agree. Look, if you try, if

0:45:30.680 --> 0:45:33.320
<v Speaker 1>you drafted Nick Pavetta, it's obviously for the skills you

0:45:33.440 --> 0:45:36.360
<v Speaker 1>you want them to win out. Um, so try your

0:45:36.400 --> 0:45:38.479
<v Speaker 1>best to be patient. I'm starting to get a little

0:45:38.480 --> 0:45:41.480
<v Speaker 1>bit of a John Gray vibe right from from Nick Pavetta.

0:45:41.760 --> 0:45:44.239
<v Speaker 1>Where it's you know, is he always gonna be a

0:45:44.320 --> 0:45:46.719
<v Speaker 1>guy where the peripherals are much better than the e

0:45:47.000 --> 0:45:49.560
<v Speaker 1>r A. He pitches in a tough ballpark and Citizens Bank,

0:45:49.760 --> 0:45:52.040
<v Speaker 1>it's obviously not to the same level of corpse field.

0:45:52.120 --> 0:45:54.560
<v Speaker 1>But no, last year four four point seven seven ear a,

0:45:54.680 --> 0:45:57.560
<v Speaker 1>we see the strikeouts, we see the command is solid,

0:45:57.719 --> 0:45:59.120
<v Speaker 1>and the fact that he had a three point four

0:45:59.160 --> 0:46:00.960
<v Speaker 1>two x fit and we all right, well, he's got

0:46:01.040 --> 0:46:03.160
<v Speaker 1>to get better. Well this year only three starts from

0:46:03.160 --> 0:46:04.879
<v Speaker 1>the nine point four or five year a three point

0:46:04.960 --> 0:46:06.840
<v Speaker 1>nine eight x five. Is this a guy that's just

0:46:06.960 --> 0:46:10.640
<v Speaker 1>always gonna have better peripherals than his actual numbers? I

0:46:10.680 --> 0:46:12.960
<v Speaker 1>don't know, Like we do have a sample size of

0:46:13.000 --> 0:46:16.880
<v Speaker 1>three innings at this point regarding Nick Pavetta, But you know,

0:46:16.920 --> 0:46:19.040
<v Speaker 1>at some point I got to see him put it together. Uh,

0:46:19.239 --> 0:46:22.480
<v Speaker 1>you know, met for for for ess and g's here

0:46:23.680 --> 0:46:25.320
<v Speaker 1>those who are listening and watching at home, and you

0:46:25.360 --> 0:46:28.840
<v Speaker 1>figure out what's are would you rather have Nick Pavetta

0:46:29.000 --> 0:46:34.640
<v Speaker 1>or EDWARDO. Rodriguez. I had them pretty much, uh, neck

0:46:34.719 --> 0:46:36.560
<v Speaker 1>and neck. They were part of the six pack of

0:46:36.800 --> 0:46:43.640
<v Speaker 1>upside arms bumped and disappointed so far. You know, I

0:46:43.840 --> 0:46:47.239
<v Speaker 1>probably there slight lean Pivetta. I had him a couple

0:46:47.239 --> 0:46:50.319
<v Speaker 1>of spots higher. I mean, it's pretty much a very

0:46:50.360 --> 0:46:53.319
<v Speaker 1>close coin to I think Edward Rodriguez is a very

0:46:53.440 --> 0:46:56.520
<v Speaker 1>talented picture who unfortunately hasn't made him to stay healthy.

0:46:56.760 --> 0:47:01.000
<v Speaker 1>Had the bed knee, got the surgery, expected good things

0:47:01.040 --> 0:47:04.439
<v Speaker 1>out of Rodriguez, and like I said, these guys we're

0:47:04.560 --> 0:47:07.279
<v Speaker 1>seeing have a good starter or two we get all

0:47:07.360 --> 0:47:11.320
<v Speaker 1>excited about. You know, the guy Thornton in the in Toronto.

0:47:12.000 --> 0:47:13.600
<v Speaker 1>You know, just because you have a lot of swinging

0:47:13.719 --> 0:47:16.600
<v Speaker 1>mrs in one game doesn't mean that he's going to

0:47:16.760 --> 0:47:19.520
<v Speaker 1>translate for the rest of the season. And look, I

0:47:20.040 --> 0:47:23.239
<v Speaker 1>think that John Gray Camp is a really good one, Frank,

0:47:23.520 --> 0:47:26.280
<v Speaker 1>And I think you know, maybe that is the case.

0:47:26.840 --> 0:47:29.479
<v Speaker 1>But you have a bench too, and he's on my bench.

0:47:29.560 --> 0:47:32.360
<v Speaker 1>This week. Uh, you know a guy like Pavetta. I know,

0:47:32.560 --> 0:47:35.040
<v Speaker 1>people after the first couple of starts for I Rod

0:47:35.120 --> 0:47:36.960
<v Speaker 1>were like, he's on my bench, and I'm like, you

0:47:37.080 --> 0:47:40.719
<v Speaker 1>can't do it. I know last week we went a

0:47:40.760 --> 0:47:42.920
<v Speaker 1>little back and forth on Zach Wheeler. I'm like, you

0:47:43.080 --> 0:47:46.520
<v Speaker 1>can't sit Wheeler. You you invested too much on him.

0:47:46.719 --> 0:47:49.480
<v Speaker 1>He's not at course field. You gotta roll with him.

0:47:50.000 --> 0:47:52.120
<v Speaker 1>You know, some of these guys, you're gonna start him over.

0:47:53.000 --> 0:47:57.000
<v Speaker 1>It's it's gonna backfire the majority of times. Sometimes. Yeah,

0:47:57.120 --> 0:47:59.680
<v Speaker 1>if you have like you're a fifth or six starter

0:47:59.760 --> 0:48:01.319
<v Speaker 1>and you want to take a shot on these two

0:48:01.400 --> 0:48:03.400
<v Speaker 1>start guys or these guys that are coming off a

0:48:03.440 --> 0:48:05.759
<v Speaker 1>good start, I understand it. But I think in the

0:48:05.840 --> 0:48:07.600
<v Speaker 1>long one, you gotta at least give him a month

0:48:07.719 --> 0:48:11.520
<v Speaker 1>or so. In my opinion. The reason I asked because

0:48:11.520 --> 0:48:14.000
<v Speaker 1>I actually traded Nick Pavetta to Greg in our in

0:48:14.080 --> 0:48:18.239
<v Speaker 1>our home, our work ley here for Eduardo Rodriguez. So

0:48:18.760 --> 0:48:21.399
<v Speaker 1>I was able to read pure I think that's very fair. Yeah,

0:48:21.400 --> 0:48:22.759
<v Speaker 1>I was able to read the rewards of the third

0:48:22.800 --> 0:48:26.360
<v Speaker 1>start while I was like, did not that he was

0:48:26.600 --> 0:48:29.879
<v Speaker 1>very very bad? It's not it's two star pitchers. Let's

0:48:29.880 --> 0:48:32.600
<v Speaker 1>continue all of the two start pictures. Frank Um, and

0:48:32.640 --> 0:48:35.680
<v Speaker 1>we mentioned a water Rodriguez. What about Derrick Rodriguez who

0:48:35.719 --> 0:48:39.640
<v Speaker 1>faces Washington and Pittsburgh this week, dek Arriez for the

0:48:39.680 --> 0:48:42.600
<v Speaker 1>San Francisco Giants matter. Are you on him this week? No,

0:48:42.719 --> 0:48:45.319
<v Speaker 1>I'm not. And look, he's only giving up one walk

0:48:45.360 --> 0:48:48.760
<v Speaker 1>in three starts. That's excellent. Uh. To me, he's upside

0:48:48.840 --> 0:48:51.800
<v Speaker 1>is a four A four e R a picture outside

0:48:51.840 --> 0:48:54.239
<v Speaker 1>of an excellent spin rate on his curve ball. I

0:48:54.360 --> 0:48:58.160
<v Speaker 1>think he's an average picture or an adequate picture, even

0:48:58.320 --> 0:49:02.920
<v Speaker 1>I've changed our turn and picture at best. I'm not

0:49:03.000 --> 0:49:04.759
<v Speaker 1>gonna roll with him. I don't think the strike an

0:49:04.840 --> 0:49:08.520
<v Speaker 1>upside is there to gamble on. So I wasn't a

0:49:08.640 --> 0:49:12.240
<v Speaker 1>Rodriguez guy coming into the season, and I'm not gambling

0:49:12.320 --> 0:49:15.080
<v Speaker 1>on him right now. I didn't have any shares of

0:49:15.600 --> 0:49:18.000
<v Speaker 1>de rod as well, Greggy, I will say this, or

0:49:18.000 --> 0:49:19.960
<v Speaker 1>you're playing a daily transactions league. I like him for

0:49:20.040 --> 0:49:22.960
<v Speaker 1>the start against the Pittsburgh Pirates in Pittsburgh. I do

0:49:23.080 --> 0:49:27.680
<v Speaker 1>agree that he's probably mostly a an average picture in

0:49:27.760 --> 0:49:30.280
<v Speaker 1>baseball that gets saved by the fact that he pitches

0:49:30.360 --> 0:49:33.720
<v Speaker 1>in San Francisco, which is a huge park. But regarding

0:49:33.840 --> 0:49:35.600
<v Speaker 1>his two starts this week, I believe both of them

0:49:35.640 --> 0:49:42.040
<v Speaker 1>are on the road at Washington and Pittsburgh, so you know,

0:49:42.640 --> 0:49:45.920
<v Speaker 1>they're still regarded as as more picture friendly parks, but

0:49:46.120 --> 0:49:49.400
<v Speaker 1>obviously not as good as San Francisco and Washington is

0:49:49.480 --> 0:49:51.160
<v Speaker 1>you know, obviously they're swinging the hot pads to start

0:49:51.200 --> 0:49:53.720
<v Speaker 1>the year, so you're playing a daily league. I wouldn't

0:49:53.800 --> 0:49:56.120
<v Speaker 1>use them against Washington, maybe against Pittsburgh, but overall I

0:49:56.120 --> 0:49:59.400
<v Speaker 1>wouldn't use them either. My arguably favorite to start picture

0:49:59.480 --> 0:50:02.440
<v Speaker 1>here these week is Kyle Gibson, who faces Toronto and

0:50:02.680 --> 0:50:05.920
<v Speaker 1>is in Baltimore. Uh. The fantasy community has a love

0:50:05.960 --> 0:50:08.319
<v Speaker 1>hate relationship with Kyle Gibson. Do you love him where

0:50:08.320 --> 0:50:12.600
<v Speaker 1>you hate him? I love him for what I want

0:50:12.719 --> 0:50:16.120
<v Speaker 1>him to be. Which was my replacement for Rick Porcello

0:50:16.239 --> 0:50:17.920
<v Speaker 1>this year because he was he was going a hundred

0:50:17.960 --> 0:50:20.680
<v Speaker 1>pitchs later and for like two dollars for a buck

0:50:20.760 --> 0:50:22.800
<v Speaker 1>or two in auctions. I thought he could give you

0:50:22.880 --> 0:50:25.640
<v Speaker 1>that hundred and eighty innings or more, you know, maybe

0:50:25.680 --> 0:50:28.759
<v Speaker 1>closer to two hundred, possibly give you the strikeouts of

0:50:28.840 --> 0:50:31.160
<v Speaker 1>say a hundred and eighty, which he's gonna give you

0:50:31.200 --> 0:50:33.960
<v Speaker 1>strike ats for volume in the innings pitched. It hasn't

0:50:34.000 --> 0:50:36.839
<v Speaker 1>translated early on. I still believe it, but I don't

0:50:36.840 --> 0:50:39.080
<v Speaker 1>know if he's getting this to start now. Of course,

0:50:39.600 --> 0:50:43.359
<v Speaker 1>now that Martine Perez is pitching tonight and I think

0:50:43.440 --> 0:50:46.520
<v Speaker 1>they have him for Saturday, and now I'm seeing Cole

0:50:46.640 --> 0:50:49.520
<v Speaker 1>Stewart as a possibility on Sunday. That's one of the

0:50:49.600 --> 0:50:52.600
<v Speaker 1>frustrations about this, trying to do this two start week

0:50:52.960 --> 0:50:55.440
<v Speaker 1>in March or eight in the month of April. I

0:50:55.480 --> 0:50:57.520
<v Speaker 1>can't wait for this month to be over. With these

0:50:57.560 --> 0:50:59.920
<v Speaker 1>off days and rainouts and teams being able to move

0:51:00.040 --> 0:51:02.840
<v Speaker 1>some things around. That meeting of fish starter, it becomes

0:51:03.080 --> 0:51:07.080
<v Speaker 1>uh confusion. It's a tough one, Greg, because I really

0:51:07.160 --> 0:51:09.080
<v Speaker 1>like the matchups and we we just don't know as

0:51:09.120 --> 0:51:10.719
<v Speaker 1>of right now whether or not he's going to have

0:51:10.880 --> 0:51:14.359
<v Speaker 1>that that two star week. I use CBS and they

0:51:14.440 --> 0:51:16.000
<v Speaker 1>kind of they you know, they project to the best

0:51:16.040 --> 0:51:18.640
<v Speaker 1>of their ability to figure out who's a two star pitcher.

0:51:18.800 --> 0:51:22.000
<v Speaker 1>So I believe it was Toronto and Baltimore. Those are

0:51:22.080 --> 0:51:24.640
<v Speaker 1>pretty damn good matchups, right Like, if you can't start

0:51:24.719 --> 0:51:26.839
<v Speaker 1>Kyle Gibson for a two star week against those two,

0:51:27.080 --> 0:51:29.640
<v Speaker 1>when are you gonna start this guy. So he hasn't

0:51:29.719 --> 0:51:31.239
<v Speaker 1>been great to start start the year. He actually got

0:51:31.239 --> 0:51:33.640
<v Speaker 1>blown up against the Royals and then also did not

0:51:33.719 --> 0:51:36.239
<v Speaker 1>perform well against the Mets. He's giving up a ton

0:51:36.280 --> 0:51:38.480
<v Speaker 1>of walks, but again, uh, you know, if you can't

0:51:38.520 --> 0:51:41.080
<v Speaker 1>use them against Baltimore in Toronto, especially in a deeper league,

0:51:41.320 --> 0:51:45.080
<v Speaker 1>when using him, I tend to agree that's only the

0:51:45.160 --> 0:51:47.520
<v Speaker 1>only time I'm going to use really any of these guys.

0:51:48.040 --> 0:51:52.080
<v Speaker 1>For the Minnesota Twinkies coming up, we get to this

0:51:52.200 --> 0:51:54.919
<v Speaker 1>is a really interesting one. He joked about it last Friday.

0:51:54.920 --> 0:51:57.440
<v Speaker 1>That was you, Darvish, because he faces Miami, and in

0:51:57.560 --> 0:52:00.160
<v Speaker 1>Miami you're gonna start him. He also faces Ares on it,

0:52:00.239 --> 0:52:02.359
<v Speaker 1>so it's a two star picture. Obviously you're gonna play him.

0:52:02.719 --> 0:52:05.120
<v Speaker 1>What are your thoughts thus farmat on you, dar Wish

0:52:05.200 --> 0:52:09.000
<v Speaker 1>or what you've seen from him. It's been disappointing though

0:52:09.280 --> 0:52:13.000
<v Speaker 1>he did have on the last start zero wooks, so

0:52:13.120 --> 0:52:15.280
<v Speaker 1>you gotta take You gotta look for civil linings everywhere,

0:52:15.400 --> 0:52:19.279
<v Speaker 1>so you gotta try. So yeah, zero walks and that

0:52:19.400 --> 0:52:22.520
<v Speaker 1>was progress the point where you, Darvish to me, I

0:52:22.560 --> 0:52:25.000
<v Speaker 1>wrote the semi piece, if you own him, this is

0:52:25.040 --> 0:52:28.080
<v Speaker 1>a much start. If you're not gonna start him this week,

0:52:28.680 --> 0:52:30.960
<v Speaker 1>then why is he on your roster? There's you don't

0:52:31.040 --> 0:52:33.759
<v Speaker 1>have there's no justification for him not to be here.

0:52:33.920 --> 0:52:39.680
<v Speaker 1>He's at Miami and I forget the second start, but yeah,

0:52:39.920 --> 0:52:42.520
<v Speaker 1>so you have to roll him out in this two

0:52:42.560 --> 0:52:45.880
<v Speaker 1>start week hopefully you know, he had to figure some

0:52:46.000 --> 0:52:49.719
<v Speaker 1>things out, maybe mechanically. You know, that first start was horrific,

0:52:50.160 --> 0:52:53.359
<v Speaker 1>but it's gotten incrementally better, I'll say, you know, trying

0:52:53.360 --> 0:52:56.239
<v Speaker 1>to look for that. You know, always stay positive spin.

0:52:56.840 --> 0:52:59.680
<v Speaker 1>So yeah, you Darvish is if I own him, he's

0:52:59.680 --> 0:53:01.919
<v Speaker 1>definitely my line up this week. I have one share

0:53:01.920 --> 0:53:04.239
<v Speaker 1>of you, Darvish. Greg. I was hesitant, but I did

0:53:04.320 --> 0:53:06.400
<v Speaker 1>put him in the lineup. And I think it's just

0:53:06.440 --> 0:53:09.719
<v Speaker 1>a little bit different regarding Darvish because you know, he's

0:53:09.760 --> 0:53:11.640
<v Speaker 1>coming back from the injury at the slow start and

0:53:11.680 --> 0:53:13.719
<v Speaker 1>spring training, so he's still kind of ramping up. Like,

0:53:14.320 --> 0:53:16.759
<v Speaker 1>if I could afford to wait, I would rather see

0:53:16.880 --> 0:53:19.799
<v Speaker 1>him build himself up and kind of work himself into

0:53:20.560 --> 0:53:23.480
<v Speaker 1>some kind of form, hopefully a good form here, So

0:53:24.520 --> 0:53:26.640
<v Speaker 1>personally I would want to be patient. But just like

0:53:26.719 --> 0:53:29.239
<v Speaker 1>that start against the Marlins is so enticing, So I

0:53:29.320 --> 0:53:32.400
<v Speaker 1>owned him in one spot I started him, So I

0:53:32.480 --> 0:53:35.320
<v Speaker 1>guess I agree Greg get him in there. But you know,

0:53:36.400 --> 0:53:38.400
<v Speaker 1>if you had the luxury of waiting and you had

0:53:38.400 --> 0:53:40.560
<v Speaker 1>a good enough rotation, I would kind of just you know,

0:53:40.600 --> 0:53:42.760
<v Speaker 1>want to see him get worked up and and slowly

0:53:42.800 --> 0:53:44.919
<v Speaker 1>build himself back up. One other name we talked about

0:53:45.040 --> 0:53:47.000
<v Speaker 1>Frank last week was Tyler Molly, who face it off

0:53:47.000 --> 0:53:49.680
<v Speaker 1>against the Dodgers and the Padres this week. Molly's like

0:53:50.120 --> 0:53:52.120
<v Speaker 1>a league average guy, but people have been excited about

0:53:52.160 --> 0:53:54.439
<v Speaker 1>him for a little while. A little prospect pedigree here

0:53:54.960 --> 0:53:57.680
<v Speaker 1>it was Tyler Molly got met Oh, this is what

0:53:57.760 --> 0:53:59.200
<v Speaker 1>I'll say, This is what I wrote about him the

0:53:59.239 --> 0:54:02.480
<v Speaker 1>top of my head. He's become finishing relevant again. And

0:54:02.760 --> 0:54:07.080
<v Speaker 1>you know he's got like a strikeout rate ground ball

0:54:08.200 --> 0:54:10.960
<v Speaker 1>that's great. You know, that's everything you want, the walk

0:54:11.000 --> 0:54:14.279
<v Speaker 1>percentages and had to control. But then you look at

0:54:14.320 --> 0:54:17.000
<v Speaker 1>the flip side. I believe that, you know, he's got

0:54:17.120 --> 0:54:20.719
<v Speaker 1>that really low babbitt the hard strand rate. This is

0:54:20.800 --> 0:54:24.279
<v Speaker 1>not a week I'm gonna be using Mally in a

0:54:24.360 --> 0:54:28.400
<v Speaker 1>deeper league. Yes, I would roster him. I don't think

0:54:28.440 --> 0:54:30.879
<v Speaker 1>I want to roll him out this week, though, Yeah,

0:54:30.880 --> 0:54:33.000
<v Speaker 1>I agree, and I actually watched his last start against

0:54:33.040 --> 0:54:35.719
<v Speaker 1>the Marlins. He has that strand rate, the left on

0:54:35.760 --> 0:54:39.400
<v Speaker 1>base percentage that Modique is talking about, so he wiggles

0:54:39.440 --> 0:54:42.000
<v Speaker 1>out of some trouble, I'll put it that way. I remember,

0:54:42.280 --> 0:54:45.720
<v Speaker 1>I believe he had first and second against the Marlins

0:54:45.760 --> 0:54:47.960
<v Speaker 1>early on in that game and got saved by a phenomenal,

0:54:48.040 --> 0:54:51.719
<v Speaker 1>phenomenal diving stop by Jose Glaciers, which ultimately ended up

0:54:51.760 --> 0:54:53.880
<v Speaker 1>saving him. And the walks have actually been up a

0:54:53.880 --> 0:54:55.200
<v Speaker 1>little bit more this year. You look at his minor

0:54:55.280 --> 0:54:57.560
<v Speaker 1>league numbers, he didn't walk anyone, but in the majors

0:54:57.840 --> 0:55:00.759
<v Speaker 1>he's been walking more people. So it's something that he

0:55:00.880 --> 0:55:02.880
<v Speaker 1>has to get right. That's starting against the Dodgers just

0:55:03.000 --> 0:55:06.600
<v Speaker 1>really scares me too, So I think owning him is

0:55:06.640 --> 0:55:09.239
<v Speaker 1>like a speculative player deeper league, or just leaving him

0:55:09.239 --> 0:55:10.960
<v Speaker 1>on your scout list for now, I think makes sense.

0:55:11.040 --> 0:55:13.120
<v Speaker 1>But I'm with Matt, I'm not starting him. That that's

0:55:13.120 --> 0:55:15.320
<v Speaker 1>starting against the Dodgers really worries me. I agree with that,

0:55:15.480 --> 0:55:19.240
<v Speaker 1>but he's he's certainly a watchless guy for I'm attention

0:55:19.520 --> 0:55:22.920
<v Speaker 1>based on the strikeout for ending and the groundball rate

0:55:22.960 --> 0:55:25.880
<v Speaker 1>being over fifty percent. I agree with all those factors

0:55:26.239 --> 0:55:28.840
<v Speaker 1>that Modeca mentioned. It's just the match against the Dodgers

0:55:28.880 --> 0:55:30.480
<v Speaker 1>scares me. But yes, you should. You should be paying

0:55:30.480 --> 0:55:32.840
<v Speaker 1>attention to him to see, you know, look if he

0:55:32.960 --> 0:55:35.400
<v Speaker 1>performs well against the Dodgers, and yeah, I think that's

0:55:35.480 --> 0:55:37.480
<v Speaker 1>kind of like, uh, that's giving you a green light

0:55:37.560 --> 0:55:38.960
<v Speaker 1>there that all right, maybe we could trust this guy

0:55:38.960 --> 0:55:42.680
<v Speaker 1>a little bit more. Yeah, absolutely, Matt, What do you

0:55:42.760 --> 0:55:44.360
<v Speaker 1>what's going on in the athletic this week? What do

0:55:44.400 --> 0:55:48.439
<v Speaker 1>you what do people pay attention to? Uh? To start week,

0:55:48.880 --> 0:55:52.360
<v Speaker 1>two Star Pictures is up podcast with two Star Pictures

0:55:52.480 --> 0:55:54.560
<v Speaker 1>is up as well and hitting Planner, so you know,

0:55:54.600 --> 0:55:57.160
<v Speaker 1>get a chance to check that out. And remember, chaos

0:55:57.480 --> 0:56:00.279
<v Speaker 1>is a ladder. Chaos is a lot of didn't we

0:56:00.320 --> 0:56:04.000
<v Speaker 1>get to do Thrones recaps each and every Monday. It's fun,

0:56:04.480 --> 0:56:07.120
<v Speaker 1>especially for the crazy episodes because you know that they're coming.

0:56:07.239 --> 0:56:09.960
<v Speaker 1>You know they're coming. Greg, there's well, there's five episodes left.

0:56:10.400 --> 0:56:11.920
<v Speaker 1>Next week is also an hour, and then I think

0:56:11.960 --> 0:56:14.319
<v Speaker 1>they all incrementally get higher, like it was like an

0:56:14.360 --> 0:56:16.040
<v Speaker 1>hour of twenty minutes. I think there's one that's like

0:56:16.080 --> 0:56:18.680
<v Speaker 1>closer to ninety minutes as well, So there's a lot

0:56:18.800 --> 0:56:21.520
<v Speaker 1>that still needs to happen between you know, a war

0:56:21.600 --> 0:56:24.640
<v Speaker 1>against the White Walkers and a war against Searcy. There's

0:56:24.640 --> 0:56:26.480
<v Speaker 1>a lot that needs to happen in these next five episodes.

0:56:26.520 --> 0:56:29.040
<v Speaker 1>And it's gonna be fun to get a little recap here. Yeah,

0:56:29.080 --> 0:56:32.200
<v Speaker 1>it's gonna be a good time. It was nice, like everyone,

0:56:33.360 --> 0:56:35.080
<v Speaker 1>I think it was good last night, right, everyone gets

0:56:35.080 --> 0:56:36.279
<v Speaker 1>like talked to each other and see each other the

0:56:36.320 --> 0:56:38.120
<v Speaker 1>first time in a while. You know, it's only gonna good.

0:56:38.160 --> 0:56:41.320
<v Speaker 1>Dad Hill from here. We've talked about this in the

0:56:41.360 --> 0:56:44.960
<v Speaker 1>pit a ton and I wouldn't mind if just everyone dies. Sure,

0:56:45.160 --> 0:56:47.680
<v Speaker 1>I just want to see chaos Modica, like you know,

0:56:47.840 --> 0:56:49.440
<v Speaker 1>I wanna. I want to cry. I want to be

0:56:49.520 --> 0:56:52.040
<v Speaker 1>emotional during the final season. I want to see crazy

0:56:52.080 --> 0:56:53.719
<v Speaker 1>stuff happened. I don't know, you know what. I might

0:56:53.760 --> 0:56:55.120
<v Speaker 1>be alone, but you know what, I don't want to say.

0:56:55.239 --> 0:56:57.520
<v Speaker 1>I don't need to see Danny and John snow riding

0:56:57.640 --> 0:56:59.719
<v Speaker 1>dragons kissing each other. That's why I don't need riding

0:56:59.719 --> 0:57:03.440
<v Speaker 1>each other. I would do That was awful. That was

0:57:03.520 --> 0:57:07.200
<v Speaker 1>like high school exactly exactly. Why do be of like

0:57:07.480 --> 0:57:11.600
<v Speaker 1>how to train a dragn not great? Not great? Net.

0:57:11.680 --> 0:57:14.759
<v Speaker 1>We're replacing Matt Modica with Chris Ventcher. We'll do that next, Matt,

0:57:14.800 --> 0:57:16.200
<v Speaker 1>we'll talk to you next this week. We'll be back

0:57:16.280 --> 0:57:17.160
<v Speaker 1>right back, ethless