WEBVTT - Top 10 NFL Week 16 Player Prop Picks & Predictions (Ep. 627)

0:00:01.040 --> 0:00:03.200
<v Speaker 1>Welcome in everybody to Betting Pros. It's time to place

0:00:03.240 --> 0:00:05.240
<v Speaker 1>your bets. It is meet Joey p Joe Piez a

0:00:05.320 --> 0:00:08.240
<v Speaker 1>PA and this is VP NFL with me as ol.

0:00:08.360 --> 0:00:10.960
<v Speaker 1>Ways to talk props for Week sixteen in the NFL,

0:00:11.280 --> 0:00:14.440
<v Speaker 1>My Boys, the Undertaker, Andrew Rickson and the Welsh. Where

0:00:14.480 --> 0:00:15.800
<v Speaker 1>I could take a look at some of the Week

0:00:15.880 --> 0:00:19.200
<v Speaker 1>sixteen games that are looming, lots of playoff implications, some

0:00:19.320 --> 0:00:22.440
<v Speaker 1>standalone Saturday games. It's a good time right now. Make

0:00:22.480 --> 0:00:25.120
<v Speaker 1>sure you're subscribing to the Vetting Pros YouTube channel as well.

0:00:25.120 --> 0:00:27.160
<v Speaker 1>Make sure you're ring developed notifications because we've got all

0:00:27.160 --> 0:00:30.440
<v Speaker 1>the college football bracket stuff going on here, we got

0:00:30.520 --> 0:00:32.720
<v Speaker 1>NBA stuff going on here. We've got a lot going on.

0:00:33.120 --> 0:00:34.920
<v Speaker 1>And it was a lot going on last night, including

0:00:34.920 --> 0:00:38.080
<v Speaker 1>a free kick, something that hasn't happened in my lifetime,

0:00:38.120 --> 0:00:41.040
<v Speaker 1>your lifetime, maybe most of the people's lifetimes watching this show.

0:00:41.600 --> 0:00:44.240
<v Speaker 1>And it was cool. I liked it. It was fun.

0:00:44.920 --> 0:00:49.839
<v Speaker 1>I don't think anybody here was possibly happier than Jim Harbaugh,

0:00:49.920 --> 0:00:52.640
<v Speaker 1>who seemed to be waiting for this his entire coaching career.

0:00:52.680 --> 0:00:55.640
<v Speaker 1>In the press conference, which is pretty hilarious. So ericson

0:00:56.000 --> 0:00:57.720
<v Speaker 1>what did you think of the free kick last night

0:00:57.760 --> 0:01:00.480
<v Speaker 1>in the Chargers rebound against the Denver Broncos.

0:01:00.880 --> 0:01:03.120
<v Speaker 2>I absolutely loved it. I loved how the broadcasters talked

0:01:03.160 --> 0:01:05.319
<v Speaker 2>about did teams even practice? And the first thing Sean

0:01:05.360 --> 0:01:07.440
<v Speaker 2>Payton says after the free kicks, like, yeah, we prepared

0:01:07.480 --> 0:01:09.039
<v Speaker 2>for this every single week, we get ready for the

0:01:09.040 --> 0:01:11.560
<v Speaker 2>free kick. That hasn't love it connected in fifty years,

0:01:11.600 --> 0:01:14.000
<v Speaker 2>because of course they practiced for it. So I thought

0:01:14.040 --> 0:01:15.600
<v Speaker 2>it was fun. Anything that's think different.

0:01:15.800 --> 0:01:16.000
<v Speaker 1>I know.

0:01:16.040 --> 0:01:17.880
<v Speaker 2>I explained it to my wife and she pretended to care,

0:01:17.920 --> 0:01:19.399
<v Speaker 2>and then I knew that she was the one for

0:01:19.520 --> 0:01:22.199
<v Speaker 2>me because she's like, oh, like free kick, that sounds

0:01:22.280 --> 0:01:23.880
<v Speaker 2>kind of cool. I knew she was lying, but it

0:01:23.920 --> 0:01:26.839
<v Speaker 2>made me feel good because this hasn't happened in fifty years,

0:01:26.920 --> 0:01:28.920
<v Speaker 2>Like this is cool. And he made it too, like

0:01:28.920 --> 0:01:31.240
<v Speaker 2>if he hadn't missed it, Oh, well, that was what.

0:01:31.200 --> 0:01:33.200
<v Speaker 1>I was gonna say. Well, could you imagine that there's

0:01:33.400 --> 0:01:36.319
<v Speaker 1>like here you go, nobody's you know, rushing the kicker.

0:01:36.680 --> 0:01:39.200
<v Speaker 1>It is literally a free kick, and yet in the

0:01:39.280 --> 0:01:41.679
<v Speaker 1>back of your mind you're going, what if he misses this?

0:01:41.760 --> 0:01:44.720
<v Speaker 1>What a horrendous situation? This would be, so I mean,

0:01:44.920 --> 0:01:47.160
<v Speaker 1>let's talk about that for a second, because the incredible

0:01:47.240 --> 0:01:50.320
<v Speaker 1>high of getting that moment only to kind of have

0:01:50.400 --> 0:01:52.400
<v Speaker 1>it go by the wayside, perhaps with the way kicking

0:01:52.440 --> 0:01:54.240
<v Speaker 1>has been so terrible in twenty twenty four and I

0:01:54.280 --> 0:01:56.360
<v Speaker 1>loved the last couple of years, probably two. But he

0:01:56.360 --> 0:01:59.480
<v Speaker 1>did make it, so everything was pretty on board there.

0:01:59.520 --> 0:02:02.200
<v Speaker 1>But again, something that a lot of us didn't even

0:02:02.200 --> 0:02:05.080
<v Speaker 1>know existed and have never seen actually execute it in

0:02:05.080 --> 0:02:08.040
<v Speaker 1>our lifetimes. In nineteen seventy six, I think they said, right.

0:02:07.920 --> 0:02:09.720
<v Speaker 3>He was gonna make that. From seventy yeah, But that's

0:02:09.880 --> 0:02:12.840
<v Speaker 3>that's my only issue with this whole thing, though, is

0:02:13.000 --> 0:02:16.080
<v Speaker 3>they're talking about it. They weren't explaining it like I

0:02:16.160 --> 0:02:20.000
<v Speaker 3>get conceptually, like it's a free kick. They're like, oh man, guys,

0:02:20.200 --> 0:02:21.680
<v Speaker 3>could this be a free kick? We haven't seen this

0:02:21.680 --> 0:02:24.720
<v Speaker 3>in fifty years. Then explain it, say that all the

0:02:24.760 --> 0:02:26.680
<v Speaker 3>guys have to line up like it's an ech, like

0:02:26.720 --> 0:02:29.240
<v Speaker 3>it's a kickoff. They didn't explain any that it's going

0:02:29.320 --> 0:02:32.440
<v Speaker 3>to be put on a tea. There was literally no breakdown.

0:02:32.480 --> 0:02:34.320
<v Speaker 3>They just kept saying free kick. If there was a

0:02:34.360 --> 0:02:37.560
<v Speaker 3>drinking game, everyone is passed out and still struggling today

0:02:37.600 --> 0:02:39.359
<v Speaker 3>because they're like, oh, free kick, free kick, because you

0:02:39.360 --> 0:02:41.520
<v Speaker 3>could believe it'd be a free kick, Like what what

0:02:41.560 --> 0:02:44.080
<v Speaker 3>are we doing? What is different about the free kick?

0:02:44.160 --> 0:02:46.920
<v Speaker 3>Why is it free? Why doesn't it cost? I don't know.

0:02:47.160 --> 0:02:49.079
<v Speaker 3>I thought it was just like so overblown. And then yes,

0:02:49.120 --> 0:02:50.600
<v Speaker 3>he made it, and like I said, we'd have made

0:02:50.639 --> 0:02:52.720
<v Speaker 3>it from like seventy or seventy five. It's great.

0:02:52.760 --> 0:02:54.520
<v Speaker 2>You know there's a better that's been betting on will

0:02:54.520 --> 0:02:57.120
<v Speaker 2>there be a free kick? And every single game for

0:02:57.200 --> 0:03:01.040
<v Speaker 2>the every NFL slate finally, finally, Victoria.

0:03:01.240 --> 0:03:04.040
<v Speaker 1>I don't know if I don't know if if that even.

0:03:03.919 --> 0:03:05.000
<v Speaker 2>Broke somebody out there.

0:03:05.160 --> 0:03:07.720
<v Speaker 3>I mean, I don't think that's available. I don't I

0:03:07.720 --> 0:03:10.160
<v Speaker 3>can't remember fifty years. I don't even think the sites

0:03:10.160 --> 0:03:12.280
<v Speaker 3>would know what that is because they didn't explain it.

0:03:12.360 --> 0:03:13.840
<v Speaker 1>You could be damn sure it's gonna be on there

0:03:13.880 --> 0:03:18.440
<v Speaker 1>this week. Oh yeah, right, copycat league? All right, Before

0:03:18.480 --> 0:03:20.840
<v Speaker 1>we move on to Week sixteen, any final thoughts from

0:03:20.919 --> 0:03:23.000
<v Speaker 1>last week? Eric said, I know you were painfully close

0:03:23.040 --> 0:03:24.920
<v Speaker 1>to something. It fell just a little short, little Bryce

0:03:24.960 --> 0:03:27.519
<v Speaker 1>Young action that kind of bitch. You're in the rear end.

0:03:28.080 --> 0:03:32.000
<v Speaker 2>Yep so three and two overall, so winning week still positive.

0:03:32.120 --> 0:03:34.000
<v Speaker 2>Jalen hurts let me down. He did not throw interception

0:03:34.440 --> 0:03:37.240
<v Speaker 2>and Bryceywng came up half a yard short of the

0:03:37.320 --> 0:03:40.000
<v Speaker 2>Russian props. So that was very disappointing. And I know

0:03:40.080 --> 0:03:43.040
<v Speaker 2>that Welsh also has feelings about the Carolina Panthers that

0:03:43.080 --> 0:03:45.880
<v Speaker 2>basically were underwhelming. They were on the money line, they

0:03:45.880 --> 0:03:47.960
<v Speaker 2>were supposed to win, they lost, And I know that

0:03:48.320 --> 0:03:49.880
<v Speaker 2>Welsh also lost out on a bed because of the

0:03:49.920 --> 0:03:50.760
<v Speaker 2>Carolina Panthers.

0:03:51.080 --> 0:03:53.560
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, three and two also would have been four and

0:03:53.640 --> 0:03:56.520
<v Speaker 3>one half of a yard. Adam Thielen was fifty one

0:03:56.680 --> 0:04:00.400
<v Speaker 3>point five and he finished fifty one, so did the

0:04:00.800 --> 0:04:03.080
<v Speaker 3>end of the week three and two. It's been very

0:04:03.080 --> 0:04:07.080
<v Speaker 3>profitable over the last month or whatever. But like that

0:04:07.160 --> 0:04:10.600
<v Speaker 3>one hurt, Like the TUA process was bad. He's stuck.

0:04:10.640 --> 0:04:13.600
<v Speaker 3>He looked awful. Some of those I'm kicking myself for

0:04:13.720 --> 0:04:17.920
<v Speaker 3>not laddering CDE Lamb CD LAMB. Cook rushed as did

0:04:18.000 --> 0:04:21.200
<v Speaker 3>Russ Wilson. He hit that one great feeling. One hurts

0:04:21.240 --> 0:04:23.080
<v Speaker 3>just a tiny bit. That's the one where you're like,

0:04:23.160 --> 0:04:25.320
<v Speaker 3>you don't even focus on you having a positive winning

0:04:25.360 --> 0:04:27.320
<v Speaker 3>weekend when you lose by a half a yard by

0:04:27.320 --> 0:04:29.520
<v Speaker 3>a guy, but both of us three and two ericson.

0:04:29.760 --> 0:04:32.120
<v Speaker 1>We'll take that, all right, just like Boe Belichick. We're

0:04:32.120 --> 0:04:34.719
<v Speaker 1>on to Cincinnati. We're on the week sixteen, and of

0:04:34.760 --> 0:04:36.719
<v Speaker 1>course we're gonna be using the prop bet cheat sheet.

0:04:36.720 --> 0:04:38.440
<v Speaker 1>If you haven't played around with it, make sure you do.

0:04:38.920 --> 0:04:40.640
<v Speaker 1>It's the best place to get all of your props.

0:04:40.640 --> 0:04:43.279
<v Speaker 1>You could take the matchups, the odds, you could sort everything, positions,

0:04:43.279 --> 0:04:45.479
<v Speaker 1>whatever you're looking for. It's so easy to find, and

0:04:45.520 --> 0:04:48.280
<v Speaker 1>you're gonna find the projections with the best line where

0:04:48.279 --> 0:04:50.479
<v Speaker 1>to bet it. It makes life so much easier. So

0:04:50.560 --> 0:04:52.160
<v Speaker 1>use the propet chia chee. Go to betting pros dot

0:04:52.160 --> 0:04:54.760
<v Speaker 1>com slash props or if you already have the app,

0:04:54.800 --> 0:04:56.760
<v Speaker 1>which you should. You should have downloaded the app anyway,

0:04:56.800 --> 0:04:58.640
<v Speaker 1>and use the free tools there for the premium side

0:04:58.680 --> 0:04:59.960
<v Speaker 1>for a couple of days. Then I mentioned it's for

0:05:00.600 --> 0:05:02.320
<v Speaker 1>and you also get the opportunity to use the prop

0:05:02.320 --> 0:05:05.120
<v Speaker 1>betchi ici there. It is an invaluable asset and something

0:05:05.160 --> 0:05:07.599
<v Speaker 1>you should be using for the rest of the NFL

0:05:07.640 --> 0:05:10.720
<v Speaker 1>season into the playoffs. All right, let's start here, Welsh.

0:05:10.800 --> 0:05:12.400
<v Speaker 1>I can't believe you're kicking things off here with the

0:05:12.440 --> 0:05:15.520
<v Speaker 1>forty nine ers, like you just just just hate yourself

0:05:15.520 --> 0:05:17.240
<v Speaker 1>that much? Is that where we're at right now? Is

0:05:17.240 --> 0:05:19.720
<v Speaker 1>that just like continuing to just beat yourself up. I mean,

0:05:19.760 --> 0:05:21.839
<v Speaker 1>just let it go. I thought you let the season go.

0:05:21.920 --> 0:05:24.240
<v Speaker 3>Last week it felt like I'm not betting that they're

0:05:24.240 --> 0:05:26.800
<v Speaker 3>gonna win, and I'm not betting Deebo Samuel, So I

0:05:26.839 --> 0:05:29.200
<v Speaker 3>don't hate myself that much. Like if I want to

0:05:29.200 --> 0:05:32.760
<v Speaker 3>hate myself, if you you want to hate yourself, bet

0:05:32.760 --> 0:05:35.279
<v Speaker 3>Deebo Samuel receiving yards or anytime I bet he.

0:05:35.279 --> 0:05:37.599
<v Speaker 1>Has one hundred down this week, I'm gonna it's just

0:05:37.640 --> 0:05:40.840
<v Speaker 1>so clear the over corrections touchdown, it's amazing.

0:05:40.960 --> 0:05:43.279
<v Speaker 3>So no, but what I am gonna and maybe it

0:05:43.320 --> 0:05:45.640
<v Speaker 3>is a little self hatred to it, but there's there's

0:05:45.680 --> 0:05:48.120
<v Speaker 3>actually just a lot of like situational stuff. Why I

0:05:48.200 --> 0:05:51.039
<v Speaker 3>like this one brock Purty over passing touchdowns one and

0:05:51.040 --> 0:05:53.360
<v Speaker 3>a half this week and it's plus money and that's

0:05:53.360 --> 0:05:55.760
<v Speaker 3>what really like I like about it. Not to mention,

0:05:55.839 --> 0:05:57.840
<v Speaker 3>we've had a lot of bad weather stuff that's been

0:05:57.880 --> 0:06:00.200
<v Speaker 3>going on recently. There's some bad weather games that are

0:06:00.240 --> 0:06:02.599
<v Speaker 3>going on this weekend. It ain't in the Dolphins in

0:06:02.640 --> 0:06:05.679
<v Speaker 3>the forty nine Ers game. It should be nice and clear.

0:06:05.760 --> 0:06:08.680
<v Speaker 3>Dolphins have given up two passing touchdowns in two of

0:06:08.720 --> 0:06:12.520
<v Speaker 3>their last three games. Rock Purty really hasn't, and that's

0:06:12.560 --> 0:06:14.600
<v Speaker 3>obviously why this is plus money. At this point, you're

0:06:14.640 --> 0:06:16.280
<v Speaker 3>throw in like the you know, bad weather game and

0:06:16.360 --> 0:06:19.280
<v Speaker 3>just the overall poor performance in general. But they're going

0:06:19.360 --> 0:06:22.400
<v Speaker 3>into a spot where Juwan Jennings thirteenth best cornerback to

0:06:22.440 --> 0:06:25.440
<v Speaker 3>wide receiver matchup this week and George Kittle graded out.

0:06:25.440 --> 0:06:27.920
<v Speaker 3>That's on PFF. By the way, George Kittle graded out

0:06:27.920 --> 0:06:31.240
<v Speaker 3>on PFF as the number one tight end from advantage standpoint.

0:06:31.400 --> 0:06:35.680
<v Speaker 3>They graded him a sixty eight percent matchup advantage per perspective.

0:06:36.680 --> 0:06:39.320
<v Speaker 3>That is twenty percent higher than the next tight end.

0:06:39.360 --> 0:06:41.640
<v Speaker 3>That's how far we are going on this one. And

0:06:41.680 --> 0:06:44.719
<v Speaker 3>then when I'm talking about, like, you know, the situational thing,

0:06:45.200 --> 0:06:47.839
<v Speaker 3>I just like that they don't have a running back.

0:06:47.960 --> 0:06:50.040
<v Speaker 3>They're down four of them. ISAA Grendo is not going

0:06:50.120 --> 0:06:52.600
<v Speaker 3>to play. You're gonna go to Patrick Taylor, maybe Abana Kanda,

0:06:52.800 --> 0:06:55.440
<v Speaker 3>maybe a little bit of Deebo Samuel. I think what

0:06:55.520 --> 0:06:58.040
<v Speaker 3>that is going to end up establishing is not an

0:06:58.240 --> 0:07:01.200
<v Speaker 3>established running game they're gone have to throw the ball,

0:07:01.480 --> 0:07:05.279
<v Speaker 3>and there's an advantage with Juwan Jennings, with George Kittle.

0:07:05.400 --> 0:07:07.640
<v Speaker 3>I like this. Dolphins are giving it up. I think

0:07:07.640 --> 0:07:10.160
<v Speaker 3>they're gonna slang it. There's also you know, Mike McDaniel,

0:07:10.240 --> 0:07:12.720
<v Speaker 3>Kyle Shanahan kind of back and forth. I actually do

0:07:12.760 --> 0:07:14.840
<v Speaker 3>think there's gonna be some points scored in this game.

0:07:14.880 --> 0:07:17.760
<v Speaker 3>But obviously I have weird blind spots sometimes with the Niners.

0:07:17.760 --> 0:07:21.640
<v Speaker 3>But plus money Brock Party on two touchdowns against the Dolphins, Yep,

0:07:21.800 --> 0:07:22.840
<v Speaker 3>that's gonna be my number one.

0:07:22.920 --> 0:07:24.400
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, and Purty for the year has been a bit

0:07:24.440 --> 0:07:26.480
<v Speaker 1>of a road warrior. Actually, he's been much better on

0:07:26.520 --> 0:07:28.600
<v Speaker 1>the road in terms of QBR and all the staffs.

0:07:28.800 --> 0:07:31.400
<v Speaker 1>So that being said, Andrew Erickson looks like you are

0:07:31.440 --> 0:07:34.640
<v Speaker 1>piggybacking on the Brock Party front as well. For Week sixteen.

0:07:35.040 --> 0:07:37.200
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, I like the over on Brock Parties passing yards

0:07:37.240 --> 0:07:39.360
<v Speaker 2>two hundred and forty two and a half passing yards.

0:07:39.800 --> 0:07:41.640
<v Speaker 2>I think that the numbers kind of suppressed just because

0:07:41.680 --> 0:07:43.880
<v Speaker 2>of the last couple of weeks where they've been bad.

0:07:44.280 --> 0:07:46.200
<v Speaker 2>He's been he had an injury he was dealing with,

0:07:46.240 --> 0:07:48.920
<v Speaker 2>He's played in a bad couple bad weather games. They're

0:07:48.920 --> 0:07:51.480
<v Speaker 2>playing in Miami, nice and sunny. It's gonna be great.

0:07:51.520 --> 0:07:53.720
<v Speaker 2>The Web's gonna be fine. There're two teams that have

0:07:53.720 --> 0:07:55.400
<v Speaker 2>been unerwhelming, but I think that they're gonna take their

0:07:55.400 --> 0:07:59.000
<v Speaker 2>frustrations out on the opposing defenses. I really think that's

0:07:59.040 --> 0:08:01.040
<v Speaker 2>gonna be the case here in the matchup. And I

0:08:01.080 --> 0:08:03.200
<v Speaker 2>think the thing to point out with Brock Purty is

0:08:03.560 --> 0:08:05.680
<v Speaker 2>so he's gone over this number in six of nine

0:08:05.720 --> 0:08:08.800
<v Speaker 2>games with George Kittle, with Debo and John Jennings like

0:08:08.800 --> 0:08:10.200
<v Speaker 2>all in the lineup. So when he has all of

0:08:10.280 --> 0:08:12.920
<v Speaker 2>his guys, even Debo to an extent like, he usually

0:08:12.920 --> 0:08:14.680
<v Speaker 2>goes over this number. And I think that you're just

0:08:14.680 --> 0:08:17.239
<v Speaker 2>getting a good value on it because of in recent

0:08:17.280 --> 0:08:19.840
<v Speaker 2>weeks where he's been under in three of four, because

0:08:19.920 --> 0:08:22.360
<v Speaker 2>of the things I pointed out injuries and weather, which

0:08:22.360 --> 0:08:23.800
<v Speaker 2>I don't think are going to be factors in this

0:08:23.840 --> 0:08:26.560
<v Speaker 2>particular matchup. And I think from a next gen stats

0:08:26.640 --> 0:08:28.480
<v Speaker 2>point of view, this is someone I was looking at.

0:08:28.560 --> 0:08:30.520
<v Speaker 2>So the Dolphins have played cover two at the fifth

0:08:30.600 --> 0:08:32.840
<v Speaker 2>highest rate in the NFL this season, and if you

0:08:32.840 --> 0:08:35.160
<v Speaker 2>look at what Party has done against that type of coverage,

0:08:35.320 --> 0:08:37.760
<v Speaker 2>nine point two yards per attempt against cover two, third

0:08:37.800 --> 0:08:39.560
<v Speaker 2>most in the NFL. So I think they're just gonna

0:08:39.640 --> 0:08:41.439
<v Speaker 2>let it rip their down to their fourth string running back.

0:08:41.520 --> 0:08:43.480
<v Speaker 2>Is this going to be Patrick Taylor? Twenty carries? Now?

0:08:43.800 --> 0:08:46.360
<v Speaker 2>This is hey. Let's rip it with Brock Purdy. Let's

0:08:46.360 --> 0:08:48.439
<v Speaker 2>beat up on this Dolphin. I mean Aaron Rodgers three

0:08:48.440 --> 0:08:50.120
<v Speaker 2>for three dy yards against the Dolphins. Steve Is the

0:08:50.200 --> 0:08:52.599
<v Speaker 2>guy hasn't done it since the Ronald Reagan administration. Come on,

0:08:53.760 --> 0:08:56.880
<v Speaker 2>So I like Purdy, so handholding with Welsh here. Perty's

0:08:56.880 --> 0:08:58.680
<v Speaker 2>gonna have himself a day, all right?

0:08:58.720 --> 0:09:01.920
<v Speaker 1>So Brock Purty looking pretty good for week sixteen. Let's

0:09:01.960 --> 0:09:05.160
<v Speaker 1>talk about an investment in the New York Giants. Yes,

0:09:05.720 --> 0:09:10.559
<v Speaker 1>that's correct, the New York Giants. So again you got

0:09:10.559 --> 0:09:12.680
<v Speaker 1>to convince me here on this. Drew Lock's playing quarterback.

0:09:12.720 --> 0:09:14.000
<v Speaker 1>I mean, if you can't invest in Drew Lock and

0:09:14.040 --> 0:09:15.760
<v Speaker 1>the Giants at this point, what can you invest in?

0:09:16.080 --> 0:09:18.040
<v Speaker 1>Let's talk about Milik Neighbors. The number for name is

0:09:18.040 --> 0:09:21.000
<v Speaker 1>sixty seven and a half. You think Drew Lock can

0:09:21.040 --> 0:09:24.079
<v Speaker 1>get this to an over Let's talk about the why? Yeah?

0:09:24.080 --> 0:09:26.720
<v Speaker 3>Well, I mean why as we have gotten there? He

0:09:26.760 --> 0:09:28.880
<v Speaker 3>has hit this in three straight games. You're talking about

0:09:28.920 --> 0:09:32.080
<v Speaker 3>Milik Neighbors over receiving yard sixty seven and a half.

0:09:32.120 --> 0:09:35.400
<v Speaker 3>He has hit this three straight games while receiving thirty

0:09:35.720 --> 0:09:39.000
<v Speaker 3>seven targets over that time in a row. No but

0:09:39.120 --> 0:09:42.920
<v Speaker 3>thirty seven targets. Falcons giving up the tenth most receiving

0:09:42.960 --> 0:09:45.360
<v Speaker 3>yards to wide receivers so far this year. Falcons have

0:09:45.360 --> 0:09:47.800
<v Speaker 3>also given up, if you care about this, the top

0:09:47.840 --> 0:09:50.760
<v Speaker 3>five most fantasy points to wide receivers over the last month.

0:09:50.920 --> 0:09:53.360
<v Speaker 3>And this is a big volume play, So you know,

0:09:53.360 --> 0:09:56.080
<v Speaker 3>I'm tempted always with the receptions, way more than you

0:09:56.120 --> 0:09:58.480
<v Speaker 3>guys on some of these things, and I have some

0:09:58.520 --> 0:10:01.600
<v Speaker 3>fun reception stuff coming up here. But with this one,

0:10:01.800 --> 0:10:04.800
<v Speaker 3>that pure set of volume against a Falcons defense. Like

0:10:04.800 --> 0:10:07.800
<v Speaker 3>I said, tenth most receiving yards given up overall. We

0:10:07.840 --> 0:10:10.080
<v Speaker 3>know he's getting targets. He's had double digit targets in

0:10:10.120 --> 0:10:13.319
<v Speaker 3>three straight games. He is hitting these numbers. Don't think

0:10:13.360 --> 0:10:14.920
<v Speaker 3>this is a great team, but also think they're gonna

0:10:14.920 --> 0:10:16.319
<v Speaker 3>be playing from behind. Even though you do have a

0:10:16.360 --> 0:10:18.880
<v Speaker 3>rookie quarterback in there and Michael Pennock's starting, I think

0:10:18.920 --> 0:10:20.839
<v Speaker 3>he's going to be efficient and that just leads to

0:10:20.880 --> 0:10:23.840
<v Speaker 3>them doing more throwing, so always going to Malik Neighbors.

0:10:24.040 --> 0:10:27.480
<v Speaker 3>This is a relatively low number. Anything under seventy I

0:10:27.480 --> 0:10:30.760
<v Speaker 3>think is playable. As each yard went down, I felt

0:10:30.760 --> 0:10:33.760
<v Speaker 3>more comfortable. Sixty seven was a fantastic marker. So sixty

0:10:33.800 --> 0:10:36.800
<v Speaker 3>seven and a half over for Elik Neighbors. That's number two.

0:10:36.800 --> 0:10:37.760
<v Speaker 3>But I get the hesitation.

0:10:38.240 --> 0:10:41.800
<v Speaker 1>Last week Darnold Mooney was disappointing this week he has

0:10:42.160 --> 0:10:45.280
<v Speaker 1>for quarterbacks, So perhaps Michael Pennix, who did have a

0:10:45.320 --> 0:10:48.480
<v Speaker 1>pensant in Washington for making a big plays. You know,

0:10:48.600 --> 0:10:50.360
<v Speaker 1>whenever there's like a big throw to you made in

0:10:50.360 --> 0:10:52.000
<v Speaker 1>a big moment, he is never afraid of it, which

0:10:52.000 --> 0:10:53.480
<v Speaker 1>is something I love about Michael Penicks. And I was

0:10:53.520 --> 0:10:55.160
<v Speaker 1>kind of a defender of Michael Pennix a lot last

0:10:55.200 --> 0:10:57.200
<v Speaker 1>year in a lot of shows, and I enjoy watching

0:10:57.320 --> 0:10:59.440
<v Speaker 1>play quarterback, and I think this is a unique opportunity

0:10:59.440 --> 0:11:02.480
<v Speaker 1>against the bad team for him to play through the

0:11:02.480 --> 0:11:03.800
<v Speaker 1>nerves a little bit in the first half and then

0:11:03.840 --> 0:11:06.160
<v Speaker 1>maybe settled in. But there's definitely some big play potential

0:11:06.160 --> 0:11:07.520
<v Speaker 1>in there. And I know Andrew you and I have

0:11:07.600 --> 0:11:10.959
<v Speaker 1>mentioned before maybe looking for the over on the biggest

0:11:11.160 --> 0:11:14.320
<v Speaker 1>pass yardage in a single play for Michael Pennock's being

0:11:14.320 --> 0:11:16.640
<v Speaker 1>an interesting one because he does have that big playability

0:11:16.840 --> 0:11:18.760
<v Speaker 1>looking for the over on his yards. But there's also

0:11:18.760 --> 0:11:21.080
<v Speaker 1>a receiver that you feel has a good prop this

0:11:21.120 --> 0:11:22.960
<v Speaker 1>week is Darnal Mooney. Let's talk about him.

0:11:23.240 --> 0:11:25.240
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, Donald Mooney's gonna go over fifty two and a

0:11:25.280 --> 0:11:27.480
<v Speaker 2>half receiving arts because they're just They're gonna let it

0:11:27.559 --> 0:11:30.040
<v Speaker 2>rip with Michael Pennix too. They're gonna show everybody why

0:11:30.080 --> 0:11:33.000
<v Speaker 2>they took this guy where they did, because this matchup

0:11:33.120 --> 0:11:37.199
<v Speaker 2>is chef's kiss for deep ball receivers. Giants defense ranks

0:11:37.280 --> 0:11:39.880
<v Speaker 2>dead lass and EPA per target on passes of twenty

0:11:39.880 --> 0:11:41.439
<v Speaker 2>plus air yards and something that I want to point

0:11:41.440 --> 0:11:43.680
<v Speaker 2>out about last week's matchup, the Raiders have been good

0:11:43.720 --> 0:11:46.439
<v Speaker 2>defending the deep ball, so that kind of played into

0:11:46.640 --> 0:11:49.720
<v Speaker 2>why Donald Mooney was so disappointing. Also considering Kirk Cousins

0:11:49.760 --> 0:11:51.240
<v Speaker 2>at his quarterback, and they decided to run the ball

0:11:51.240 --> 0:11:53.720
<v Speaker 2>a million times and never throw. So that's the only

0:11:53.800 --> 0:11:55.600
<v Speaker 2>way this beats me would be they just don't get

0:11:55.679 --> 0:11:58.600
<v Speaker 2>enough volume. But Mooney's not a volume based receiver. He

0:11:58.679 --> 0:12:01.319
<v Speaker 2>is a big play special and no defense has been

0:12:01.360 --> 0:12:04.240
<v Speaker 2>worse at guarding the deep ball than the New York Giants,

0:12:04.280 --> 0:12:06.520
<v Speaker 2>So honestly, it would not surprise me. All they go hard,

0:12:06.559 --> 0:12:08.520
<v Speaker 2>play action the first play of the game and they

0:12:08.600 --> 0:12:11.439
<v Speaker 2>just rocket it down the field to Darnell Mooney get

0:12:11.440 --> 0:12:14.000
<v Speaker 2>the crowd fired up in Atlanta for their new rookie quarterback.

0:12:14.800 --> 0:12:17.079
<v Speaker 2>I think that the main takeaways from this game is

0:12:17.120 --> 0:12:19.280
<v Speaker 2>going to be, well, they should have started Michael Penix

0:12:19.320 --> 0:12:19.760
<v Speaker 2>months ago.

0:12:20.320 --> 0:12:22.520
<v Speaker 1>Well, but that's the problem is like that could be

0:12:22.520 --> 0:12:24.480
<v Speaker 1>the takeaway against the New York Football Giant. Yeah.

0:12:24.520 --> 0:12:26.839
<v Speaker 2>Ye, clearly wa wave blown out of proportion and we're

0:12:26.840 --> 0:12:28.880
<v Speaker 2>gonna be fading the Falcons the week after, trying.

0:12:28.679 --> 0:12:30.199
<v Speaker 1>To think who they play next week? Ericson, do you

0:12:30.240 --> 0:12:33.160
<v Speaker 1>know if the okay? So it's really it's not gonna

0:12:33.160 --> 0:12:35.400
<v Speaker 1>make a difference. We're all gonna get excited about Michael Pennis.

0:12:35.400 --> 0:12:36.920
<v Speaker 1>Maybe too much money.

0:12:36.920 --> 0:12:39.160
<v Speaker 3>Can I ask, is there any temptation I was looking

0:12:39.240 --> 0:12:41.960
<v Speaker 3>as you were starting this to play the longest reception

0:12:42.080 --> 0:12:44.200
<v Speaker 3>for Darnell Mooney just because you know you did have

0:12:44.240 --> 0:12:47.000
<v Speaker 3>that donut. Fifty two yards is a pretty aggressive marker

0:12:47.080 --> 0:12:49.480
<v Speaker 3>off of that. Twenty two and a half is the

0:12:49.520 --> 0:12:53.600
<v Speaker 3>longest reception for Darnell Mooney. Boy, that feels kind of good. Ericson,

0:12:54.080 --> 0:12:56.280
<v Speaker 3>would that be something that you would suggest I would

0:12:56.320 --> 0:12:58.040
<v Speaker 3>do if someone is scared to be off of the

0:12:58.080 --> 0:12:59.199
<v Speaker 3>donut for mooney.

0:12:59.320 --> 0:13:00.720
<v Speaker 2>I think both make a lot of sense.

0:13:00.960 --> 0:13:03.000
<v Speaker 1>If you like the biggest total, then you might as

0:13:03.000 --> 0:13:05.560
<v Speaker 1>well continue with the overrun receiving two. That's just good logic.

0:13:05.600 --> 0:13:08.880
<v Speaker 2>I feel like, I mean, I haven't particularly dove into

0:13:08.880 --> 0:13:12.319
<v Speaker 2>the longest receptions prop market this year, but I think

0:13:12.360 --> 0:13:14.360
<v Speaker 2>that your point is very spot on.

0:13:14.400 --> 0:13:16.320
<v Speaker 3>I think I've only done one on this show and

0:13:16.400 --> 0:13:19.160
<v Speaker 3>hit it Withdvante. It was under twenty.

0:13:19.160 --> 0:13:20.640
<v Speaker 1>He does a lot of those on the Thursday nights,

0:13:20.960 --> 0:13:23.360
<v Speaker 1>of course, he loves. Last night was the first time

0:13:23.400 --> 0:13:25.199
<v Speaker 1>in like five years that Gus Edwards had a run

0:13:25.200 --> 0:13:27.199
<v Speaker 1>for more than ten yards, and of course that was

0:13:27.240 --> 0:13:28.760
<v Speaker 1>one of our prop bets yesterday and then he had

0:13:28.760 --> 0:13:30.360
<v Speaker 1>that big run and it was just we were just

0:13:30.440 --> 0:13:31.319
<v Speaker 1>laughing about it last week.

0:13:31.320 --> 0:13:33.120
<v Speaker 2>I got hurting that game too. We're like, oh, we're good,

0:13:33.160 --> 0:13:34.439
<v Speaker 2>We're good to go, and he comes in.

0:13:34.440 --> 0:13:38.040
<v Speaker 3>He text me He's like, I had Gus Edwards Underyard's

0:13:38.320 --> 0:13:40.160
<v Speaker 3>longest rush of five.

0:13:42.280 --> 0:13:44.800
<v Speaker 1>And still nothing on Michael Pennock's rushing yards as of

0:13:44.880 --> 0:13:46.719
<v Speaker 1>right now on Friday recording is like keep looking for

0:13:46.800 --> 0:13:49.120
<v Speaker 1>rushing yards for Pennix. I don't know what they're going

0:13:49.160 --> 0:13:51.400
<v Speaker 1>to say it at. It could be a wide range.

0:13:51.800 --> 0:13:53.040
<v Speaker 1>I think the number is going to be a little

0:13:53.080 --> 0:13:54.480
<v Speaker 1>lower than it should be in that first shot out

0:13:54.480 --> 0:13:55.880
<v Speaker 1>of the gate. I would take the over on that too.

0:13:55.920 --> 0:13:57.640
<v Speaker 1>I think he's gonna get out in space a little bit.

0:13:57.880 --> 0:13:59.679
<v Speaker 1>At one point, something's gonna break down. He's gonna have

0:13:59.679 --> 0:14:01.240
<v Speaker 1>a run for at least ten yards, and if he

0:14:01.240 --> 0:14:03.520
<v Speaker 1>has one more over there, I think you're looking at

0:14:03.520 --> 0:14:05.440
<v Speaker 1>somewhere around twenty yards. I think rushing for him potentially

0:14:05.440 --> 0:14:08.000
<v Speaker 1>in this game against the Giants. All right, let's move

0:14:08.080 --> 0:14:10.280
<v Speaker 1>on to the next pick, and just a quick reminder too,

0:14:10.320 --> 0:14:11.880
<v Speaker 1>you can always follow all of our picks too on

0:14:11.960 --> 0:14:13.800
<v Speaker 1>betting Pros. Just put our name in the search tab

0:14:13.800 --> 0:14:16.480
<v Speaker 1>and you can follow Welsh ericson myself and look at

0:14:16.480 --> 0:14:17.720
<v Speaker 1>all the things that we're in on this week. For

0:14:17.760 --> 0:14:19.440
<v Speaker 1>better or worse, we're having fun here. This is what

0:14:19.480 --> 0:14:22.040
<v Speaker 1>we do. Let's talk about a Saturday game here. I'll

0:14:22.040 --> 0:14:24.800
<v Speaker 1>talk about the Baltimore Ravens year. And you've got a

0:14:24.800 --> 0:14:27.120
<v Speaker 1>prop in a running back, but it ain't Dereck Henry.

0:14:27.200 --> 0:14:29.880
<v Speaker 1>It's just as Hill Welsh for receiving yards eighteen and

0:14:29.880 --> 0:14:31.440
<v Speaker 1>a half. So let's chat about this one.

0:14:31.760 --> 0:14:34.440
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, I love this one. Eighteen and a half receiving

0:14:34.520 --> 0:14:37.560
<v Speaker 3>yards on Justice Hill caught four passes or more in

0:14:37.600 --> 0:14:39.480
<v Speaker 3>three of his last four games. He has hit this

0:14:39.760 --> 0:14:43.040
<v Speaker 3>number in two of his last four. Has beat this

0:14:43.160 --> 0:14:46.400
<v Speaker 3>number seven times this year, and by the way, he

0:14:46.520 --> 0:14:49.280
<v Speaker 3>beat this number against the Steelers earlier this year. Steelers

0:14:49.320 --> 0:14:51.880
<v Speaker 3>are giving up or have given up this number to

0:14:52.120 --> 0:14:55.120
<v Speaker 3>four of the last five running backs that they've played.

0:14:55.520 --> 0:14:58.400
<v Speaker 3>And this is the formula, especially with any of these

0:14:58.480 --> 0:15:00.600
<v Speaker 3>running backs that are not Derek Henry. Love to throw

0:15:00.600 --> 0:15:03.720
<v Speaker 3>the ball to Justice Hill. I'm taking yards over receptions

0:15:03.720 --> 0:15:05.360
<v Speaker 3>in this point, and I believe it's at two and

0:15:05.440 --> 0:15:07.400
<v Speaker 3>a half on the receptions that it might push to

0:15:07.440 --> 0:15:10.080
<v Speaker 3>three and a half because they do throw on the ball. Also,

0:15:11.000 --> 0:15:15.840
<v Speaker 3>if you are a believer in the Lamar Jackson struggles

0:15:15.960 --> 0:15:19.880
<v Speaker 3>kryptonite of the Pittsburgh Steelers, even better because then he's

0:15:19.920 --> 0:15:21.880
<v Speaker 3>going to be less efficient, They're not going to be

0:15:21.920 --> 0:15:24.560
<v Speaker 3>moving the ball. You're gonna have a closer game, and

0:15:24.560 --> 0:15:26.960
<v Speaker 3>you're gonna have more dump offs to Justice Hill. Plus

0:15:27.120 --> 0:15:29.600
<v Speaker 3>you know, like Deck Henry is a monster, but the

0:15:29.640 --> 0:15:33.240
<v Speaker 3>Pittsburgh Steelers are a pretty tough run defense. Don't be

0:15:33.320 --> 0:15:35.320
<v Speaker 3>shocked when you see a little bit more Justice Hill

0:15:35.480 --> 0:15:37.480
<v Speaker 3>and they start moving to a passing game. God forbid,

0:15:37.520 --> 0:15:39.720
<v Speaker 3>the Steelers were to get up in this game. But again,

0:15:39.840 --> 0:15:42.280
<v Speaker 3>he hit this against the Steelers before. This is his

0:15:42.440 --> 0:15:47.160
<v Speaker 3>primary role in the Baltimore Ravens offense. I love this

0:15:47.240 --> 0:15:49.760
<v Speaker 3>one under twenty eighteen and a half is the over.

0:15:50.160 --> 0:15:52.280
<v Speaker 3>Maybe you see it move a tiny bit more. One

0:15:52.280 --> 0:15:52.960
<v Speaker 3>of my favorites.

0:15:53.080 --> 0:15:55.440
<v Speaker 1>All Right, the New York Jets and Rams are gonna

0:15:55.440 --> 0:15:57.920
<v Speaker 1>face off this weekend, and last time we saw Matthew Stafford,

0:15:58.000 --> 0:16:00.880
<v Speaker 1>things didn't look all that good. However, despite the fact

0:16:00.920 --> 0:16:03.480
<v Speaker 1>he's coming off his second worst passing total of the

0:16:03.520 --> 0:16:06.280
<v Speaker 1>season last week, just one hundred and sixty yards. The

0:16:06.320 --> 0:16:08.240
<v Speaker 1>only week that was lower than that was Week seven

0:16:08.280 --> 0:16:11.200
<v Speaker 1>against Las Vegas, where he's at one fifty four. You're confident,

0:16:11.240 --> 0:16:15.200
<v Speaker 1>Matthew Stafford. Now, the Jets have been a top eight

0:16:15.360 --> 0:16:18.080
<v Speaker 1>or so defense in terms of receiving yards given up.

0:16:18.200 --> 0:16:20.880
<v Speaker 1>So why are you looking for that bounce back this week?

0:16:20.960 --> 0:16:22.880
<v Speaker 1>Is it's just the motivation here of Stafford and the

0:16:22.960 --> 0:16:25.840
<v Speaker 1>Rams to make that final playoff push.

0:16:26.080 --> 0:16:28.640
<v Speaker 2>Well, lately, the Jets haven't been that great against quarterbacks.

0:16:28.680 --> 0:16:30.920
<v Speaker 2>For the last five quarterbacks the Jets have faced have

0:16:31.080 --> 0:16:33.080
<v Speaker 2>given up two hundred and sixty five passing yards at

0:16:33.120 --> 0:16:35.360
<v Speaker 2>least hit that number. And we look at Stafford and

0:16:35.400 --> 0:16:36.920
<v Speaker 2>what he's done when he's had his guys this year,

0:16:36.960 --> 0:16:39.760
<v Speaker 2>between Pupkin, Deakua and Cooper Cup, gone over this number

0:16:39.760 --> 0:16:42.720
<v Speaker 2>and seven of his last nine starts. Now, obviously last

0:16:42.720 --> 0:16:46.000
<v Speaker 2>week didn't work out. All of my prize picks pick'ems

0:16:46.040 --> 0:16:48.160
<v Speaker 2>all burned to flames because I was paying rock perty

0:16:48.200 --> 0:16:50.600
<v Speaker 2>with Matthew Stafford. Oh this is a lock, baby. They

0:16:50.640 --> 0:16:53.120
<v Speaker 2>got all their guys and then the weather had different ideas.

0:16:53.120 --> 0:16:54.360
<v Speaker 2>But I'm going right back to it because I don't

0:16:54.360 --> 0:16:56.280
<v Speaker 2>think that the process was terrible. When they've had their

0:16:56.280 --> 0:16:59.120
<v Speaker 2>healthy guys receivers this year, they've been going over this

0:16:59.200 --> 0:17:01.960
<v Speaker 2>passing yards not afraid of the Jets six most deep

0:17:01.960 --> 0:17:04.720
<v Speaker 2>passes face this season. And I think an interesting way

0:17:04.720 --> 0:17:06.879
<v Speaker 2>to play this actually is with the over on Cooper

0:17:06.920 --> 0:17:09.239
<v Speaker 2>Cup and his receiving yards, because every time Stafford has

0:17:09.240 --> 0:17:11.800
<v Speaker 2>gone over this number, he's brought Cooper Cup along for

0:17:11.880 --> 0:17:14.320
<v Speaker 2>the ride. And you look at the Jets worst defense

0:17:14.480 --> 0:17:16.680
<v Speaker 2>against slot receivers this season. So if you want a

0:17:16.720 --> 0:17:19.720
<v Speaker 2>little bit of a bigger payout, pair Matthew Stafford with

0:17:19.760 --> 0:17:22.680
<v Speaker 2>Cooper Cup and a little bit of correlated parlay action.

0:17:23.240 --> 0:17:25.120
<v Speaker 1>All right, let's get to the fourth pick for everybody

0:17:25.160 --> 0:17:27.359
<v Speaker 1>here and well, for this next one, you've got a

0:17:27.359 --> 0:17:29.639
<v Speaker 1>little duo action. Let's talk about this. You seem very

0:17:29.680 --> 0:17:31.199
<v Speaker 1>excited about this one, so I want to hear it.

0:17:31.640 --> 0:17:33.960
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, yeah, the next two I'm going to be throwing

0:17:34.000 --> 0:17:36.920
<v Speaker 3>at you. I'm switching stuff up for some fun here.

0:17:36.960 --> 0:17:39.280
<v Speaker 3>But I'm gonna drop I don't know if I've done

0:17:39.320 --> 0:17:41.440
<v Speaker 3>this this year because I used to do this last year.

0:17:41.800 --> 0:17:46.440
<v Speaker 3>I'm dropping a reception parlay. Nothing crazy. Two players who've

0:17:46.480 --> 0:17:48.879
<v Speaker 3>got some juice numbers, and the reason they're juiced is

0:17:48.880 --> 0:17:53.280
<v Speaker 3>because everybody likes them. We are pairing Cuba Hubbard receptions

0:17:53.359 --> 0:17:56.600
<v Speaker 3>with Jalen Warren receptions, and we are getting over two

0:17:56.680 --> 0:18:00.680
<v Speaker 3>and a half each plus one essentially one fifty fifty six.

0:18:00.720 --> 0:18:02.720
<v Speaker 3>I had it. The number is going to vary when

0:18:02.720 --> 0:18:05.840
<v Speaker 3>you guys lock it in if you do. Cardinals are

0:18:05.840 --> 0:18:08.639
<v Speaker 3>giving up the tenth most receptions to running backs on

0:18:08.680 --> 0:18:11.160
<v Speaker 3>the year and the fifth most over the last month,

0:18:11.480 --> 0:18:13.800
<v Speaker 3>So this is a Chuba thing. Cuba has caught four

0:18:14.160 --> 0:18:17.800
<v Speaker 3>two straight games and three of his last five bank

0:18:18.040 --> 0:18:19.919
<v Speaker 3>Now we move to Jalen who has hit this in

0:18:19.960 --> 0:18:23.560
<v Speaker 3>three of his last five games, including four against Baltimore Ravens.

0:18:23.800 --> 0:18:26.359
<v Speaker 3>Baltimore has given up the eighth most receptions to running

0:18:26.400 --> 0:18:29.960
<v Speaker 3>backs on the year, and the Jalen Warren one is

0:18:30.000 --> 0:18:32.200
<v Speaker 3>probably my most confident play if someone wanted to mess

0:18:32.200 --> 0:18:34.600
<v Speaker 3>around with it, just simply because I don't think the

0:18:34.600 --> 0:18:37.040
<v Speaker 3>Steelers are going to be able to really successfully run

0:18:37.119 --> 0:18:39.880
<v Speaker 3>against this team. Jalen Warren is the better running back

0:18:40.040 --> 0:18:42.600
<v Speaker 3>they're gonna throw to him. He caught four against Baltimore.

0:18:42.920 --> 0:18:45.360
<v Speaker 3>It's at two and a half with Big Juice. Don't

0:18:45.440 --> 0:18:49.600
<v Speaker 3>love to play like minus one sixty five's individually, but

0:18:49.760 --> 0:18:52.200
<v Speaker 3>I do love pairing these two guys together. Tuba seems

0:18:52.200 --> 0:18:54.880
<v Speaker 3>a tiny bit more risky, but you know, hitting those

0:18:54.920 --> 0:18:57.640
<v Speaker 3>in the last two since Brooks has been out, he

0:18:57.720 --> 0:19:00.000
<v Speaker 3>is the top dog. Even when he struggles and dis

0:19:00.080 --> 0:19:03.520
<v Speaker 3>points me in fantasy and betting last week, He's going

0:19:03.560 --> 0:19:05.880
<v Speaker 3>to get back to it laying out why you can

0:19:05.920 --> 0:19:07.600
<v Speaker 3>do that against the Cardinals. So two and a half

0:19:07.640 --> 0:19:11.879
<v Speaker 3>receptions on both Jalen and Cuba get plus money, little

0:19:11.880 --> 0:19:12.840
<v Speaker 3>reception parlay.

0:19:13.160 --> 0:19:16.159
<v Speaker 1>All right, let's go to New England. Here the Patriots

0:19:16.440 --> 0:19:18.399
<v Speaker 1>going to get their ass kicked by the Buffalo Bills.

0:19:18.480 --> 0:19:21.080
<v Speaker 1>But the one to think about the Bills the defense

0:19:21.080 --> 0:19:23.639
<v Speaker 1>continues to give up just points after points after points.

0:19:23.680 --> 0:19:26.000
<v Speaker 1>So how do we translate that into a wager that

0:19:26.080 --> 0:19:27.840
<v Speaker 1>makes sense with the Patriots side of things?

0:19:27.880 --> 0:19:30.320
<v Speaker 2>Andrew, I'm chasing the trend because we've been betting on

0:19:30.359 --> 0:19:33.560
<v Speaker 2>this all year long. Bet on running back receiving props

0:19:33.560 --> 0:19:36.200
<v Speaker 2>against the Buffalo Bills. I brought to the table last

0:19:36.200 --> 0:19:37.760
<v Speaker 2>week Dave Montgomery, and he hit it and he got

0:19:37.760 --> 0:19:39.520
<v Speaker 2>injured in that game, but it didn't even matter because

0:19:39.520 --> 0:19:41.760
<v Speaker 2>he still went over his receiving yards and it actually

0:19:41.760 --> 0:19:45.000
<v Speaker 2>moved up to before closer to kickoffs. So for me,

0:19:45.280 --> 0:19:48.040
<v Speaker 2>Romandre Stevenson looking at his receiving yards, he's gone over

0:19:48.080 --> 0:19:49.679
<v Speaker 2>twelve and a half receiving yards in five of his

0:19:49.760 --> 0:19:52.360
<v Speaker 2>last seven games. And like I said, Bill's defense top

0:19:52.400 --> 0:19:54.639
<v Speaker 2>three most yards, catches and targets to running backs this

0:19:54.720 --> 0:19:56.960
<v Speaker 2>season allowed. In the passing game, we know the Patriots

0:19:56.960 --> 0:19:58.960
<v Speaker 2>are going to be throwing a negative game script, and

0:19:59.000 --> 0:20:00.800
<v Speaker 2>I think that reminder. I mean on the first drive,

0:20:00.960 --> 0:20:02.960
<v Speaker 2>so over twelve and a half receiving yards for me

0:20:03.080 --> 0:20:04.720
<v Speaker 2>against the Buffalo Bills for Remandre.

0:20:05.440 --> 0:20:08.000
<v Speaker 1>Okay, so Remandre is on the ticket as well. Let's

0:20:08.000 --> 0:20:10.080
<v Speaker 1>do one more and then we'll get to the touchdown calls.

0:20:10.600 --> 0:20:15.359
<v Speaker 1>Let's talk about those Eagles. Jalen Hurts obviously continue to

0:20:15.400 --> 0:20:17.359
<v Speaker 1>push this team forward right now. The Eagles I think

0:20:17.359 --> 0:20:18.840
<v Speaker 1>are in the driver's seat, to tell you the truth,

0:20:18.880 --> 0:20:22.080
<v Speaker 1>for this conference. I think they went at the line

0:20:22.119 --> 0:20:24.240
<v Speaker 1>on both sides of the football. They can run the football.

0:20:24.359 --> 0:20:26.840
<v Speaker 1>You play defense, run the football. That's usually a good formula.

0:20:26.960 --> 0:20:28.440
<v Speaker 1>So what do we want to do this week when

0:20:28.440 --> 0:20:29.800
<v Speaker 1>it comes to Jalen Hurts and the Eagles?

0:20:29.800 --> 0:20:32.600
<v Speaker 3>Welsh So we're going to do the thing that feels

0:20:32.600 --> 0:20:34.919
<v Speaker 3>scariest with Jalen Hurts, and we're going to go with

0:20:35.000 --> 0:20:38.120
<v Speaker 3>passing touchdowns. This is my I don't think I've ever

0:20:38.160 --> 0:20:41.760
<v Speaker 3>done something like this. This is a variant of a

0:20:41.800 --> 0:20:44.760
<v Speaker 3>passing touchdown ladder that we're going to play. So the

0:20:44.800 --> 0:20:46.960
<v Speaker 3>main play here, and I'll tell you why I got

0:20:46.960 --> 0:20:49.720
<v Speaker 3>so excited, but the main play here is over one

0:20:49.880 --> 0:20:53.879
<v Speaker 3>point five passing touchdowns because it was plus and is

0:20:54.280 --> 0:20:57.679
<v Speaker 3>plus one seventy five, so almost two to one for

0:20:57.760 --> 0:20:59.960
<v Speaker 3>that to hit. Jalen Hurts has hit this in two

0:21:00.000 --> 0:21:03.199
<v Speaker 3>two straight games. Aj Brown is currently being given the

0:21:03.280 --> 0:21:06.080
<v Speaker 3>seventh best wide receiver quarnerback matchup where we're looking at

0:21:06.160 --> 0:21:08.399
<v Speaker 3>him in general and that offense being able to pass.

0:21:08.640 --> 0:21:12.359
<v Speaker 3>The Commanders have given up six touchdowns receiving over the

0:21:12.440 --> 0:21:15.919
<v Speaker 3>last month. Commanders also have given up the second least

0:21:16.119 --> 0:21:18.400
<v Speaker 3>fantasy points just running out fantasy points for a second

0:21:18.440 --> 0:21:20.639
<v Speaker 3>to running backs over the last month, and the least

0:21:21.000 --> 0:21:24.560
<v Speaker 3>rushing yards. So if the running game is taken away

0:21:24.600 --> 0:21:27.240
<v Speaker 3>a little bit, they're going to be passing more. Hurts.

0:21:27.960 --> 0:21:29.280
<v Speaker 3>This is my other stat I'm going to throw out

0:21:29.280 --> 0:21:33.240
<v Speaker 3>here for a second, so that ends that over two touchdowns.

0:21:33.400 --> 0:21:35.000
<v Speaker 3>He's hitting it. By the way, if you remember, the

0:21:35.000 --> 0:21:37.480
<v Speaker 3>Commanders were just like absolutely atrocious at the beginning of

0:21:37.480 --> 0:21:40.920
<v Speaker 3>the year. I love this spot now. I got all

0:21:40.960 --> 0:21:44.160
<v Speaker 3>giddy when I was looking at his numbers because I've

0:21:44.200 --> 0:21:48.480
<v Speaker 3>been peeking around at three touchdowns and his three touchdown

0:21:48.920 --> 0:21:54.040
<v Speaker 3>number is plus seven fifty this week, plus seven to fifty.

0:21:54.080 --> 0:21:57.240
<v Speaker 3>So take all of the two touchdowns stuff we talked about,

0:21:57.280 --> 0:22:00.359
<v Speaker 3>it's great matchup Commanders. They had the five time touchdown

0:22:00.400 --> 0:22:02.480
<v Speaker 3>giving up game earlier in the year. Pick all of

0:22:02.520 --> 0:22:04.920
<v Speaker 3>that stuff in there. Just a fun little anecdotal thing

0:22:04.920 --> 0:22:07.880
<v Speaker 3>in here. This is a sprinkle bet. This isn't anything crazy.

0:22:07.960 --> 0:22:11.240
<v Speaker 3>I bet you know my full unit size on Jalen Hurts.

0:22:11.400 --> 0:22:13.160
<v Speaker 3>Do a little bit of sprinkle when it's plus seven

0:22:13.200 --> 0:22:15.960
<v Speaker 3>to fifty. But just as an anecdotal thing. Hurts every

0:22:16.040 --> 0:22:19.160
<v Speaker 3>year of his career has had at least one game

0:22:19.240 --> 0:22:21.439
<v Speaker 3>of throwing three or more touchdowns every single year of

0:22:21.440 --> 0:22:25.040
<v Speaker 3>his career except for this year. Things are starting to

0:22:25.040 --> 0:22:28.720
<v Speaker 3>turn around. They're passing the ball better divisional game, by

0:22:28.760 --> 0:22:30.880
<v Speaker 3>the way. I think he's got for the last four

0:22:30.960 --> 0:22:34.520
<v Speaker 3>years three career games against Washington where he's thrown three

0:22:34.600 --> 0:22:37.120
<v Speaker 3>or more touchdowns in a game. This is a game

0:22:37.160 --> 0:22:40.520
<v Speaker 3>where the passing side gets right. Two touchdowns is the

0:22:40.560 --> 0:22:43.240
<v Speaker 3>play almost two to one. Little bit of a sprinkle

0:22:43.280 --> 0:22:46.240
<v Speaker 3>on three touchdowns at seven and a half to one

0:22:46.440 --> 0:22:48.959
<v Speaker 3>for Jalen Hurts against the Commanders.

0:22:48.720 --> 0:22:52.159
<v Speaker 1>I love it. Does the AJ Brown ankle give you

0:22:52.240 --> 0:22:53.879
<v Speaker 1>any pause whatsoever on this?

0:22:54.359 --> 0:22:55.440
<v Speaker 3>If he's active? It doesn't.

0:22:55.600 --> 0:22:57.680
<v Speaker 2>Okay, there you go, Oh, I would say too. So

0:22:57.720 --> 0:22:59.680
<v Speaker 2>it's actually interested actually looking at some of the receivers

0:22:59.680 --> 0:23:01.360
<v Speaker 2>for the because I was thinking about, Okay, if he's

0:23:01.359 --> 0:23:03.680
<v Speaker 2>throwing multiple touchdowns, who's it going to? And right now,

0:23:03.760 --> 0:23:05.760
<v Speaker 2>I don't know if this is injury related. It must

0:23:05.760 --> 0:23:08.480
<v Speaker 2>be because you're getting plus nine fifty on Davonta Smith

0:23:08.520 --> 0:23:11.600
<v Speaker 2>two touchdowns versus A J. Brown at plus eleven hundred.

0:23:12.200 --> 0:23:15.520
<v Speaker 2>I also know that this time around, Latimore is gonna

0:23:15.520 --> 0:23:17.679
<v Speaker 2>be active for the Commanders and they're probably gonna put

0:23:17.720 --> 0:23:20.919
<v Speaker 2>him on AJ Brown. So I kind of like some

0:23:21.000 --> 0:23:21.399
<v Speaker 2>of these.

0:23:21.359 --> 0:23:22.879
<v Speaker 3>Oh so you're turning this into a dvante.

0:23:23.359 --> 0:23:25.320
<v Speaker 2>I kind of like, where's the ball gonna go? I

0:23:25.400 --> 0:23:27.600
<v Speaker 2>don't know. I mean AJB was last week right like

0:23:27.640 --> 0:23:31.080
<v Speaker 2>that was his big So like I'm thinking Calcata, I'm

0:23:31.080 --> 0:23:31.720
<v Speaker 2>thinking about that.

0:23:32.040 --> 0:23:33.959
<v Speaker 3>How about another obvious one. How about another obvious one

0:23:33.960 --> 0:23:37.280
<v Speaker 3>that I didn't even talk about in here, Saquon Barkley

0:23:37.560 --> 0:23:40.600
<v Speaker 3>Barkley if they're yeah, but if Saquon Barkley is also

0:23:40.640 --> 0:23:42.919
<v Speaker 3>not able to completely do this through the ground, as

0:23:43.040 --> 0:23:45.880
<v Speaker 3>Washington has locked it down over the last month, Saquon

0:23:45.960 --> 0:23:49.000
<v Speaker 3>Barkley is also the option. So I know exactly what

0:23:49.040 --> 0:23:51.840
<v Speaker 3>you're saying here, and again the three touchdowns is the

0:23:51.920 --> 0:23:54.359
<v Speaker 3>risky thing. I don't think you should go anything nuts.

0:23:54.400 --> 0:23:56.400
<v Speaker 3>I didn't go nuts with it. I love the two

0:23:56.480 --> 0:24:00.800
<v Speaker 3>touchdowns here, AJ Brown, maybe not AJ Brown love the

0:24:00.800 --> 0:24:03.480
<v Speaker 3>two touchdowns. To me, it's a sprinkle on the three

0:24:03.480 --> 0:24:07.639
<v Speaker 3>touchdowns because that is such a massively massively.

0:24:07.240 --> 0:24:09.320
<v Speaker 2>It is also a cookie season, so got to get

0:24:09.320 --> 0:24:09.800
<v Speaker 2>those sprinkles.

0:24:09.840 --> 0:24:11.639
<v Speaker 1>Then there you go sprinkle.

0:24:12.040 --> 0:24:14.199
<v Speaker 3>I met someone that said they don't like sprinkle like.

0:24:14.240 --> 0:24:16.600
<v Speaker 3>They were like, not like, just like I don't like sprinkles,

0:24:16.600 --> 0:24:19.520
<v Speaker 3>but we're like sprinkles ruined cookies, And I was like,

0:24:19.680 --> 0:24:20.960
<v Speaker 3>what they ruined?

0:24:21.200 --> 0:24:23.439
<v Speaker 1>Wrong with you? Get out of it, Get out of

0:24:23.440 --> 0:24:28.800
<v Speaker 1>this country. What's wrong with you? You know, like sprinkles ruin.

0:24:28.880 --> 0:24:31.560
<v Speaker 3>I mean you cannot like them, but they don't ruin Erickson.

0:24:32.119 --> 0:24:33.439
<v Speaker 1>The last one you're going to talk about is one

0:24:33.440 --> 0:24:36.280
<v Speaker 1>that I've already bet. I've got a parlay as well.

0:24:36.280 --> 0:24:38.240
<v Speaker 1>It's one of my favorites of the week. It's the

0:24:38.320 --> 0:24:42.080
<v Speaker 1>Jared Goff passing yardage total. You got a two fifty

0:24:42.080 --> 0:24:44.520
<v Speaker 1>five and a half. You're going under. I'm going under.

0:24:44.880 --> 0:24:46.280
<v Speaker 1>I'm with you. I think this game is going to

0:24:46.320 --> 0:24:49.440
<v Speaker 1>get a little gross. Golf outside historically has not been good.

0:24:49.480 --> 0:24:52.479
<v Speaker 1>The the injuries to the defense. I just you know,

0:24:52.800 --> 0:24:55.800
<v Speaker 1>I have my concerns here that this is going to

0:24:55.840 --> 0:24:58.520
<v Speaker 1>be kind of just a weird, gross in division game,

0:24:58.760 --> 0:25:03.080
<v Speaker 1>and I think it's unfortunate, and I think it might

0:25:03.080 --> 0:25:04.600
<v Speaker 1>be a game that maybe you don't want to watch

0:25:04.600 --> 0:25:07.040
<v Speaker 1>that much of. But in terms of investing, I think

0:25:07.080 --> 0:25:08.440
<v Speaker 1>this is the way to do it. And you seem

0:25:08.440 --> 0:25:09.040
<v Speaker 1>to agree.

0:25:09.320 --> 0:25:11.400
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, I mean, I mean, I'm fading Jared Goff, who

0:25:11.400 --> 0:25:14.879
<v Speaker 2>oblivion this week in fantasy. I'm like ten spots below

0:25:14.920 --> 0:25:17.600
<v Speaker 2>ECR on Jared Goff. I'm telling everybody to say, Jared Goff, Yeah,

0:25:17.600 --> 0:25:19.040
<v Speaker 2>I get through five touchdowns last week? You know who

0:25:19.040 --> 0:25:21.000
<v Speaker 2>through five touchdowns a week before they played the Bears,

0:25:21.000 --> 0:25:22.560
<v Speaker 2>Sam Darnold. You know what he didn't do the next

0:25:22.600 --> 0:25:25.280
<v Speaker 2>time he played the Bears, didn't throw over five touchdowns again.

0:25:25.280 --> 0:25:27.760
<v Speaker 2>So I'm not chasing last week's box or I'm looking

0:25:27.800 --> 0:25:30.440
<v Speaker 2>at this matchup and traditionally Jared Goff when he goes

0:25:30.480 --> 0:25:33.159
<v Speaker 2>outside in the cold, there's also about a little bit

0:25:33.160 --> 0:25:36.080
<v Speaker 2>of precipitation now in the forecast in Chicago. I want

0:25:36.080 --> 0:25:37.879
<v Speaker 2>no part of Jared Goff. And this number is just

0:25:38.359 --> 0:25:40.520
<v Speaker 2>massive two hundred and fifty five and a half passing

0:25:40.600 --> 0:25:43.440
<v Speaker 2>yards again on the road this season, so this includes

0:25:43.520 --> 0:25:46.800
<v Speaker 2>just Dome road games as well. He's been fifty percent

0:25:46.840 --> 0:25:49.200
<v Speaker 2>at this number. He already faced the Bears this year,

0:25:49.240 --> 0:25:51.320
<v Speaker 2>and he was under this number when the one time

0:25:51.320 --> 0:25:53.800
<v Speaker 2>he played outside this year, he was under one hundred

0:25:53.800 --> 0:25:55.840
<v Speaker 2>and fifty passing yards. So why is his number at

0:25:55.840 --> 0:25:59.600
<v Speaker 2>two hundred and fifty five passing yards? I don't get it,

0:25:59.680 --> 0:26:01.359
<v Speaker 2>and I know Garrett Goff is gonna rup it in

0:26:01.359 --> 0:26:04.159
<v Speaker 2>my face probably, but I don't care. I think that

0:26:04.200 --> 0:26:05.880
<v Speaker 2>this game is going to be gross. Like you said,

0:26:05.920 --> 0:26:08.800
<v Speaker 2>the total is forty eight points. I just think it's

0:26:08.800 --> 0:26:12.000
<v Speaker 2>out of control. I don't know why it's so high,

0:26:12.080 --> 0:26:14.240
<v Speaker 2>but yeah, I'm going to bet against Jared Goff this

0:26:14.280 --> 0:26:17.600
<v Speaker 2>week and the Fantasy Football Semifinals, taking me under on

0:26:17.600 --> 0:26:19.880
<v Speaker 2>his passing yards and we'll see how it goes.

0:26:20.240 --> 0:26:22.399
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, I also think that I'm on raw after that

0:26:22.520 --> 0:26:24.800
<v Speaker 1>huge week two people are gonna be running to bet

0:26:24.880 --> 0:26:26.520
<v Speaker 1>him again, and I don't know. I would be looking

0:26:26.520 --> 0:26:28.280
<v Speaker 1>more for the under on his too. Maybe we're wrong,

0:26:28.480 --> 0:26:30.360
<v Speaker 1>Maybe Gough has really turned the corner on these things.

0:26:30.400 --> 0:26:34.000
<v Speaker 1>But historically speaking, those numbers it's a really big data

0:26:34.040 --> 0:26:36.240
<v Speaker 1>set that suggests that this could be a rougher day

0:26:36.240 --> 0:26:37.639
<v Speaker 1>for the Lions. Do I think they're gonna lose to

0:26:37.680 --> 0:26:38.080
<v Speaker 1>the Bears.

0:26:38.119 --> 0:26:38.199
<v Speaker 3>No?

0:26:38.280 --> 0:26:40.560
<v Speaker 1>Do I think it's gonna be a gross game. It's

0:26:40.640 --> 0:26:42.840
<v Speaker 1>very possible. I think it's definitely in the range of outcomes.

0:26:42.840 --> 0:26:44.520
<v Speaker 1>As our friend Derek Brown likes to say, all right,

0:26:44.560 --> 0:26:46.959
<v Speaker 1>let's get to the touchdowns. And of course, if you're

0:26:47.000 --> 0:26:48.800
<v Speaker 1>looking for an edge when you're betting touchdowns, go to

0:26:48.840 --> 0:26:51.359
<v Speaker 1>betting pros dot com slash touchdown. That's easy to remember,

0:26:51.400 --> 0:26:54.600
<v Speaker 1>and check out the touchdown score a report. The report

0:26:54.640 --> 0:26:58.120
<v Speaker 1>compares anytime touchdown stats to prop bets, odds, and projections

0:26:58.160 --> 0:27:00.639
<v Speaker 1>to help identify the best anytime touch bets that you

0:27:00.640 --> 0:27:03.680
<v Speaker 1>can make. So again betting pros dot com slash touchdown

0:27:04.000 --> 0:27:07.240
<v Speaker 1>for the latest touchdown bet analysis. I'm going with B

0:27:07.680 --> 0:27:11.040
<v Speaker 1>T J for one of my picks today plus one

0:27:11.160 --> 0:27:14.480
<v Speaker 1>sixty five Mac Jones. Baby, Look, this is really more,

0:27:14.920 --> 0:27:16.800
<v Speaker 1>you know against the Raiders than anything else. I think

0:27:16.840 --> 0:27:18.600
<v Speaker 1>this is a good matchup here that mac Jones could

0:27:18.640 --> 0:27:21.399
<v Speaker 1>be useful yet again, and last week, look, he's been

0:27:21.400 --> 0:27:23.440
<v Speaker 1>showing you since he's taken over that he could find

0:27:23.480 --> 0:27:26.800
<v Speaker 1>BTJ in these spots. Strangers banged up too, So I

0:27:26.800 --> 0:27:29.360
<v Speaker 1>think BTJ is kind of the only hope right now.

0:27:29.400 --> 0:27:31.960
<v Speaker 1>He's the Obi wan Kenobi of this offense. And then

0:27:32.240 --> 0:27:34.879
<v Speaker 1>I've already picked the Tennessee Titans. I think at an upset,

0:27:34.960 --> 0:27:36.439
<v Speaker 1>I think the Titans. I don't know why, I just

0:27:36.480 --> 0:27:38.080
<v Speaker 1>got this weird feel and I was like, oh, yeah,

0:27:38.080 --> 0:27:40.119
<v Speaker 1>it's just the Cole's just the colts man. The Colts

0:27:40.160 --> 0:27:42.160
<v Speaker 1>find ways to lose games every single week, and Anthony

0:27:42.200 --> 0:27:45.160
<v Speaker 1>Richardson's just all over the place. Titans play a little defense,

0:27:45.840 --> 0:27:48.760
<v Speaker 1>and I think with Mason Rudolph back, there's two bets here.

0:27:48.760 --> 0:27:50.600
<v Speaker 1>With wide receivers, you could take one of the two.

0:27:51.119 --> 0:27:52.840
<v Speaker 1>Whatever floats your boat, you could take both of them

0:27:52.880 --> 0:27:57.200
<v Speaker 1>because they're both plus one eighty NWY for life, Nick Westbrookkaine,

0:27:57.280 --> 0:27:59.400
<v Speaker 1>who has been a little touchdown drought lately, he's due,

0:27:59.760 --> 0:28:02.200
<v Speaker 1>and Calvin Ridley a plus one to eighty as well,

0:28:02.280 --> 0:28:04.200
<v Speaker 1>So you could take one or both. But I think

0:28:04.240 --> 0:28:06.720
<v Speaker 1>Mason Rudolph is going to surprise some people and in

0:28:06.800 --> 0:28:09.440
<v Speaker 1>some super flex leagues maybe garry some people to the finals,

0:28:09.440 --> 0:28:11.200
<v Speaker 1>believe it or not, because people have been desperate for

0:28:11.240 --> 0:28:13.720
<v Speaker 1>some quarterbacks. I can, You're gonna get fifteen points against

0:28:13.760 --> 0:28:17.159
<v Speaker 1>the Colts. Yes, yes he can. So we'll see how

0:28:17.160 --> 0:28:21.120
<v Speaker 1>that goes. Welsh, let's talk about your touchdown calls four

0:28:21.160 --> 0:28:21.880
<v Speaker 1>week sixteen.

0:28:22.520 --> 0:28:24.960
<v Speaker 3>Well, I'm gonna pair what I talked about with Brock Party.

0:28:24.960 --> 0:28:27.960
<v Speaker 3>I'm gonna move over to George Kittle. Love the matchup,

0:28:28.359 --> 0:28:31.640
<v Speaker 3>the best offensive advantage, and George Kittle is a touchdown

0:28:31.720 --> 0:28:34.040
<v Speaker 3>magnet in general. Brock Prig really, I mean as much

0:28:34.040 --> 0:28:36.320
<v Speaker 3>as like the deep option of what Juwan Jennings does,

0:28:36.359 --> 0:28:38.800
<v Speaker 3>George Kittle almost at all times like the number one

0:28:38.840 --> 0:28:41.800
<v Speaker 3>option for Rock Party. So I'm gonna go within anytime

0:28:41.840 --> 0:28:44.360
<v Speaker 3>touchdown on George Kittle in that nice weather plus one

0:28:44.520 --> 0:28:48.280
<v Speaker 3>fifty five and my deep play here three to one,

0:28:49.040 --> 0:28:52.000
<v Speaker 3>give me Craig Reynolds, Craig Wrent without David Montgomery. Craig

0:28:52.040 --> 0:28:55.160
<v Speaker 3>Reynolds comes in probably going to see a little bit

0:28:55.240 --> 0:28:57.120
<v Speaker 3>of that. I don't think he's gonna just take in

0:28:57.280 --> 0:29:00.200
<v Speaker 3>the David Montgomery touches that team let's taken to be

0:29:00.200 --> 0:29:02.000
<v Speaker 3>silly Gooses are not going to do that. You're gonna

0:29:02.040 --> 0:29:03.880
<v Speaker 3>just give more run to Jamiir Gibbs. But don't be

0:29:03.920 --> 0:29:07.080
<v Speaker 3>surprised when Jamiir Gibbs gets them to the line and

0:29:07.120 --> 0:29:09.880
<v Speaker 3>then in comes Craig Reynolds from the two playing that

0:29:10.000 --> 0:29:12.880
<v Speaker 3>David Montgomery after Gibbs had the hole drive and everyone

0:29:13.160 --> 0:29:16.040
<v Speaker 3>screams and complains about the vulturing. I'll take a three

0:29:16.080 --> 0:29:18.200
<v Speaker 3>to one in that Bears matchup. You guys keep talking

0:29:18.200 --> 0:29:21.080
<v Speaker 3>about as well, Bears garbage against the run. So that's

0:29:21.080 --> 0:29:22.960
<v Speaker 3>the play if Jared GoF if the lines are gonna

0:29:22.960 --> 0:29:26.080
<v Speaker 3>win the game, the total is so high, Jared God's

0:29:26.080 --> 0:29:29.200
<v Speaker 3>gonna stink, a mon Rob Saint Brown's gonna stink. Someone

0:29:29.280 --> 0:29:31.520
<v Speaker 3>has to be good. Jamiir Gibbs is clearly going to

0:29:31.560 --> 0:29:33.360
<v Speaker 3>be good. You can also run against his team. Craig

0:29:33.360 --> 0:29:35.200
<v Speaker 3>Renolds is going to get an opportunity. So three to

0:29:35.240 --> 0:29:38.040
<v Speaker 3>one on his touchdown call. That's my favorite deeper play

0:29:38.240 --> 0:29:39.360
<v Speaker 3>really like the Reynolds won a lot.

0:29:39.400 --> 0:29:41.880
<v Speaker 1>All right, let's go real deep here because somebody's due

0:29:41.920 --> 0:29:44.360
<v Speaker 1>Andrew Erickson and you're the guy to break him out.

0:29:44.440 --> 0:29:46.320
<v Speaker 1>I feel it, I feel it in my bones.

0:29:46.400 --> 0:29:49.960
<v Speaker 2>Let's go, baby, they're wrong. Just early. Trey McBride going

0:29:50.000 --> 0:29:51.760
<v Speaker 2>back to the well here. He's going to score a

0:29:51.760 --> 0:29:53.880
<v Speaker 2>touchdown this week and I think he's gonna score touchdowns

0:29:53.880 --> 0:29:56.400
<v Speaker 2>in bunches because the Carolina Panthers have allowed the most

0:29:56.440 --> 0:29:59.920
<v Speaker 2>touchdowns to tight ends this season. This is so clearly

0:30:00.040 --> 0:30:02.320
<v Speaker 2>on the Cardinals mind every time they talk about Train McBride,

0:30:02.480 --> 0:30:04.800
<v Speaker 2>like man s guy's every touchdowns. Cal Murray talking about

0:30:04.840 --> 0:30:06.440
<v Speaker 2>in an interview like yeah, we got to get eighty

0:30:06.440 --> 0:30:08.320
<v Speaker 2>five in the end zone, like it has to happen,

0:30:08.400 --> 0:30:11.160
<v Speaker 2>and what better defense do it than against the Carolina Panthers,

0:30:11.200 --> 0:30:13.680
<v Speaker 2>who are the kings of allowing the regression to hit.

0:30:13.920 --> 0:30:16.760
<v Speaker 2>Twenty twenty two, Joe Mixon couldn't score touchdown play. The

0:30:16.800 --> 0:30:20.040
<v Speaker 2>Panthers scored five five touchdowns at the end of the season,

0:30:20.080 --> 0:30:23.600
<v Speaker 2>Mike Evans was terrible all year. Long plays the Panthers

0:30:23.760 --> 0:30:26.920
<v Speaker 2>scores three touchdowns. This is the spot where guys blow

0:30:27.000 --> 0:30:30.080
<v Speaker 2>up in regression hits going in all in on Trede McBride.

0:30:30.080 --> 0:30:32.520
<v Speaker 2>I want first touchdown, I want two touchdowns, I want

0:30:32.560 --> 0:30:36.000
<v Speaker 2>three touchdowns. I want it all So Trey McBride, I'm

0:30:36.040 --> 0:30:38.080
<v Speaker 2>all in, and you'll know how my day is going around.

0:30:38.200 --> 0:30:41.080
<v Speaker 3>It just became varuc assault. He's like, I want it.

0:30:41.800 --> 0:30:46.080
<v Speaker 1>Fathera, I want to trade McBride touchdown now, Father, I

0:30:46.200 --> 0:30:50.320
<v Speaker 1>want Father, I don't want one. I want the insual thing. Andrew,

0:30:50.360 --> 0:30:52.960
<v Speaker 1>whatever you want there, we won't get it for you.

0:30:53.040 --> 0:30:55.680
<v Speaker 1>Off sutly get it for you. Depressing is gonna be

0:30:55.680 --> 0:30:57.760
<v Speaker 1>if he doesn't get a touchdown, by the.

0:30:57.760 --> 0:31:00.400
<v Speaker 2>Way, and I'm gonna be very sad, and we'll.

0:31:00.240 --> 0:31:02.520
<v Speaker 1>Give us another tight end just to have some more

0:31:02.560 --> 0:31:03.040
<v Speaker 1>fun here.

0:31:03.120 --> 0:31:04.880
<v Speaker 2>So I guess, I guess I'm pushing back on you

0:31:04.920 --> 0:31:07.280
<v Speaker 2>because you like the Titan Again. I've I've kind of

0:31:07.320 --> 0:31:09.800
<v Speaker 2>come full like one to eighty on the Titans. I

0:31:09.800 --> 0:31:11.840
<v Speaker 2>think earlier in the week, I think on the live show,

0:31:11.880 --> 0:31:13.200
<v Speaker 2>I talked about I like the Colts, and then I

0:31:13.280 --> 0:31:16.280
<v Speaker 2>dove more into the matchup and I can't back Colts

0:31:16.360 --> 0:31:19.160
<v Speaker 2>like like the I like the Titans too. I just know,

0:31:19.320 --> 0:31:21.680
<v Speaker 2>I feel I know what to expect with Mason Rudolf. Again,

0:31:21.720 --> 0:31:23.920
<v Speaker 2>It's Christmas season, Mason Rudolf. It's a great story. Yah

0:31:24.000 --> 0:31:25.960
<v Speaker 2>YadA yadayah. So, but I wish to.

0:31:26.040 --> 0:31:28.040
<v Speaker 1>Give every December to save the day.

0:31:28.840 --> 0:31:31.160
<v Speaker 2>I'm going a different route with the receivers. I like

0:31:31.240 --> 0:31:34.400
<v Speaker 2>chickakng wo as the anytime touchdown beds. So he's plus

0:31:34.400 --> 0:31:36.760
<v Speaker 2>four hundred to score so you're getting a longer odds,

0:31:36.760 --> 0:31:39.440
<v Speaker 2>and the receivers Tyler Boyd is hurt. Nick westburg Kini

0:31:39.520 --> 0:31:40.760
<v Speaker 2>is also banged up, so I don't even know if

0:31:40.760 --> 0:31:42.840
<v Speaker 2>those guys are going to play. And he had thirteen

0:31:42.840 --> 0:31:44.960
<v Speaker 2>targets last week if you include all the penalties, he

0:31:45.000 --> 0:31:47.320
<v Speaker 2>had eight from Mason Rudolph, so he's been on a

0:31:47.320 --> 0:31:49.760
<v Speaker 2>heater last couple of weeks. The Colts have also been

0:31:49.800 --> 0:31:52.280
<v Speaker 2>a team where I know they're favored, but they've actually

0:31:52.320 --> 0:31:55.120
<v Speaker 2>given up a lot of first touchdowns to the opposing team.

0:31:55.240 --> 0:31:57.720
<v Speaker 2>So you can get Chicka kon Kua pretty bonkers odds

0:31:57.760 --> 0:32:00.000
<v Speaker 2>for first touchdown score if Mason Ruff looks to him

0:32:00.080 --> 0:32:03.120
<v Speaker 2>and three starts Mason Rudolph. Because I remember this very

0:32:03.200 --> 0:32:06.000
<v Speaker 2>vividly for betting on the Titans. They scored in the

0:32:06.000 --> 0:32:08.120
<v Speaker 2>first quarter in all three of the games that he started.

0:32:08.760 --> 0:32:11.200
<v Speaker 2>The scripted drive they have with Mason Rudolph works, and

0:32:11.200 --> 0:32:13.239
<v Speaker 2>then they just don't score after that. So I think

0:32:13.240 --> 0:32:15.600
<v Speaker 2>there's a lot of first touchdown opportunities with this Tennessee

0:32:15.640 --> 0:32:18.280
<v Speaker 2>Titans offense, which is another reason why I can't back

0:32:18.320 --> 0:32:20.560
<v Speaker 2>the Colts, and I like the Titans panship with the

0:32:20.600 --> 0:32:21.200
<v Speaker 2>upset as well.

0:32:21.440 --> 0:32:23.000
<v Speaker 1>I got a weird feeling and we're gonna see some

0:32:23.000 --> 0:32:25.840
<v Speaker 1>oddities in week sixteen. It's just I don't know. I

0:32:25.880 --> 0:32:29.360
<v Speaker 1>think yesterday kind of I feel like Thursday night football. Sometimes.

0:32:29.400 --> 0:32:31.040
<v Speaker 1>Every now and then we'll set the tone for how

0:32:31.080 --> 0:32:32.880
<v Speaker 1>the rest of the week is gonna go. Like, would

0:32:32.880 --> 0:32:35.800
<v Speaker 1>it shocked me if the Giants somehow beat the Falcons now,

0:32:35.920 --> 0:32:37.680
<v Speaker 1>it would have shocked me. If Tennessee Titans one, no,

0:32:37.840 --> 0:32:40.000
<v Speaker 1>it shocked me. If the Caroline Panthers one no. None

0:32:40.000 --> 0:32:41.600
<v Speaker 1>of those things would shock me at all this week.

0:32:41.960 --> 0:32:44.880
<v Speaker 1>So buckle up, everybody, it's gonna be a fun ride

0:32:44.920 --> 0:32:48.120
<v Speaker 1>week sixteen. Here things are not done at all. Have

0:32:48.200 --> 0:32:51.040
<v Speaker 1>a great weekend, everybody watching the football. We'll be back again,

0:32:51.080 --> 0:32:53.400
<v Speaker 1>of course next week for more action. Don't forget to

0:32:53.400 --> 0:32:55.800
<v Speaker 1>subscribe to Betting Pros wherever you get your podcasts, and

0:32:55.800 --> 0:32:58.560
<v Speaker 1>of course to the YouTube channel as well, and of

0:32:58.600 --> 0:33:01.000
<v Speaker 1>course drop your comments below pixel you make it. What's

0:33:01.000 --> 0:33:02.760
<v Speaker 1>your favorite prop of the week, We want to hear you.

0:33:03.480 --> 0:33:05.760
<v Speaker 1>And don't forget to ring that bell for notification, so

0:33:05.800 --> 0:33:07.719
<v Speaker 1>you know every time a piece of content drops here

0:33:07.760 --> 0:33:09.680
<v Speaker 1>on the channel, that'll do it for us. But the

0:33:09.720 --> 0:33:11.880
<v Speaker 1>story of the game goes on for the Welsh and

0:33:11.880 --> 0:33:14.960
<v Speaker 1>Andrew ericson I'm Joey P. We'll see you next time. Kids,

0:33:15.400 --> 0:33:17.840
<v Speaker 1>I want it now. Father.

0:33:19.360 --> 0:33:21.960
<v Speaker 4>Thanks for listening to the Betting Pros podcast. If you

0:33:22.040 --> 0:33:24.400
<v Speaker 4>love the show, the best freeway to support us is

0:33:24.400 --> 0:33:27.840
<v Speaker 4>by leaving a positive review on Apple Podcasts or Spotify.

0:33:28.120 --> 0:33:30.720
<v Speaker 4>Follow us on x and TikTok at Betting Pros and

0:33:30.840 --> 0:33:34.520
<v Speaker 4>Instagram at betting Pros NFL. Also subscribe to our YouTube

0:33:34.560 --> 0:33:38.040
<v Speaker 4>channel at YouTube dot com slash Betting Pros.