WEBVTT - 6. Troubled Queen

0:00:02.759 --> 0:00:06.600
<v Speaker 1>It's a cliche truism that any time a sympathetic victim

0:00:06.800 --> 0:00:10.440
<v Speaker 1>disappears or is killed, there beatified by the press and

0:00:10.560 --> 0:00:14.560
<v Speaker 1>the public. So and so was innocent and kind. They

0:00:14.640 --> 0:00:20.320
<v Speaker 1>loved animals, They smiled all the time, the angelic aura descends.

0:00:20.720 --> 0:00:26.400
<v Speaker 1>They are good and our villains quiet, angry, a loner,

0:00:26.760 --> 0:00:30.680
<v Speaker 1>a weirdo. They wore black, and there's always that one

0:00:30.720 --> 0:00:34.720
<v Speaker 1>neighbor who just knew something was off. What we choose

0:00:34.880 --> 0:00:38.960
<v Speaker 1>to remember about someone, especially someone we don't personally know,

0:00:39.560 --> 0:00:42.920
<v Speaker 1>often depends more on the circumstances of their death or

0:00:43.000 --> 0:00:47.800
<v Speaker 1>disappearance than on who they actually were. That bipolar framework,

0:00:48.040 --> 0:00:51.680
<v Speaker 1>good versus evil flattens the missing and the dead into

0:00:51.720 --> 0:00:56.760
<v Speaker 1>two dimensional caricatures, robbing them of context. With this case,

0:00:57.040 --> 0:01:00.880
<v Speaker 1>you might ask, well, why dig into snakehouse life? I

0:01:00.960 --> 0:01:04.920
<v Speaker 1>get it, But who she was? She was a hero,

0:01:05.280 --> 0:01:09.840
<v Speaker 1>a victim, a dichotomy, aren't we all in the absence

0:01:09.880 --> 0:01:13.360
<v Speaker 1>of evidence. What's most important to me is that Sna

0:01:13.959 --> 0:01:18.520
<v Speaker 1>is missing, not was is. If there's a non nine

0:01:18.560 --> 0:01:23.280
<v Speaker 1>eleven explanation for her disappearance, which is possible, it's a

0:01:23.360 --> 0:01:27.320
<v Speaker 1>disservice to write her off as a saint Boom case closed.

0:01:28.000 --> 0:01:31.200
<v Speaker 1>I think it's important to look at sna to really

0:01:31.280 --> 0:01:34.520
<v Speaker 1>look at her, not for the sake of sensationalism, not

0:01:34.600 --> 0:01:39.640
<v Speaker 1>to judge her, to understand her, to understand why alternative

0:01:39.680 --> 0:01:50.360
<v Speaker 1>explanations makes sense, or to rule them out. From my

0:01:50.400 --> 0:01:53.920
<v Speaker 1>Heart Radio, this is missing on nine eleven, The story

0:01:53.960 --> 0:01:56.440
<v Speaker 1>of one woman who vanished on the eve of history

0:01:56.800 --> 0:01:59.720
<v Speaker 1>and my quest to find her. I'm your host, John

0:01:59.760 --> 0:02:30.960
<v Speaker 1>wall Sack. The speculation about snay House sexuality about her

0:02:31.000 --> 0:02:34.359
<v Speaker 1>love life started when her younger brother John told n

0:02:34.480 --> 0:02:37.520
<v Speaker 1>y p D Detective Richard Stark that shortly before nine

0:02:37.600 --> 0:02:41.040
<v Speaker 1>eleven he walked in on snay Hat having sex with

0:02:41.120 --> 0:02:45.200
<v Speaker 1>his girlfriend. John later denied telling that to Stark. In fact,

0:02:45.240 --> 0:02:49.400
<v Speaker 1>he denied even speaking to Stark. Ever, Stark laughed when

0:02:49.440 --> 0:02:51.720
<v Speaker 1>I told him this, Why would he make it up?

0:02:52.639 --> 0:02:57.400
<v Speaker 1>When that accusation became public, tabloids ran wild with headlines

0:02:57.480 --> 0:03:01.680
<v Speaker 1>like nine eleven trist twist is snay How bisexual? Was

0:03:01.720 --> 0:03:05.760
<v Speaker 1>she a lesbian? Was she having affairs? People close to

0:03:05.760 --> 0:03:08.920
<v Speaker 1>Snayhawk confirmed to me that she did have relationships with

0:03:08.960 --> 0:03:13.200
<v Speaker 1>both men and women, and she did have affairs. At first,

0:03:13.400 --> 0:03:16.080
<v Speaker 1>I thought Ron and sna Ha had some kind of

0:03:16.080 --> 0:03:20.760
<v Speaker 1>open marriage, but no, Ron wasn't cool with it. As

0:03:20.760 --> 0:03:24.880
<v Speaker 1>for snay haus sexuality, who cares. I don't know how

0:03:24.919 --> 0:03:28.480
<v Speaker 1>she identified, so I'm not going to label her end

0:03:28.480 --> 0:03:32.639
<v Speaker 1>of story. But the state of her marriage, well, yeah,

0:03:32.720 --> 0:03:36.640
<v Speaker 1>that matters, because nobody knows where sne Ha stayed the

0:03:36.760 --> 0:03:40.360
<v Speaker 1>night of September t with whom, or why she didn't

0:03:40.400 --> 0:03:44.280
<v Speaker 1>tell anyone where she was going to piece together her

0:03:44.320 --> 0:03:48.200
<v Speaker 1>final hours if she died, we need to answer those questions.

0:03:49.920 --> 0:03:54.040
<v Speaker 1>Earlier this year, I interviewed one of sna has former supervisors,

0:03:54.080 --> 0:03:56.320
<v Speaker 1>a doctor who agreed to speak with me on the

0:03:56.320 --> 0:03:59.320
<v Speaker 1>condition that I refer to her only as Dr E.

0:04:00.240 --> 0:04:03.720
<v Speaker 1>Dr E met snay in two thousand at Cabrini Medical

0:04:03.800 --> 0:04:09.000
<v Speaker 1>Center in Manhattan. Snay was extremely brilliant, she said, charming

0:04:09.440 --> 0:04:13.320
<v Speaker 1>and manipulative, someone who seemed to have problems with both

0:04:13.400 --> 0:04:18.200
<v Speaker 1>mental illness and substance abuse. Dr E speculated that snay

0:04:18.240 --> 0:04:22.880
<v Speaker 1>Ha was bipolar, repeatedly describing her as quote hyper sexual.

0:04:23.480 --> 0:04:25.680
<v Speaker 1>She said that snay Haaw tried to sleep with both

0:04:25.760 --> 0:04:29.919
<v Speaker 1>her and her ex husband. Snay Haw was artistic and

0:04:30.000 --> 0:04:34.640
<v Speaker 1>an excellent writer. Dr E liked. She described her as

0:04:34.800 --> 0:04:39.000
<v Speaker 1>quote like a stoner According to Dr E, snay Hall

0:04:39.120 --> 0:04:41.800
<v Speaker 1>was not the doctor type. She didn't want to be

0:04:41.839 --> 0:04:45.280
<v Speaker 1>a doctor. Dr E said that at least once snay

0:04:45.320 --> 0:04:48.839
<v Speaker 1>Ha showed up to work intoxicated. She described her as

0:04:48.960 --> 0:04:51.760
<v Speaker 1>a binge, a holic. She also said, and this is

0:04:51.839 --> 0:04:54.680
<v Speaker 1>something I heard from many other people, that snay Hawk

0:04:54.680 --> 0:04:58.839
<v Speaker 1>could be quote off, not appropriate and vulgar. That she

0:04:59.000 --> 0:05:03.840
<v Speaker 1>casually and frequently used words like pussy and inappropriate situations

0:05:04.360 --> 0:05:07.800
<v Speaker 1>to dry. It seemed that snay how I was unhappy,

0:05:07.839 --> 0:05:11.240
<v Speaker 1>that she was trying to escape something. She seemed troubled

0:05:11.880 --> 0:05:15.120
<v Speaker 1>during her time with me. She just seemed troubled, unhappy

0:05:15.120 --> 0:05:17.520
<v Speaker 1>at times, you know, a little bit of a loner.

0:05:17.640 --> 0:05:21.080
<v Speaker 1>I would say, what was her personality like? Like if

0:05:21.080 --> 0:05:22.760
<v Speaker 1>you could she word to walk into the room and

0:05:22.839 --> 0:05:25.800
<v Speaker 1>start speaking with you, what was she like as outspoken,

0:05:26.440 --> 0:05:30.960
<v Speaker 1>sometimes using curse words, you know, a little outspoken. Sometimes

0:05:31.400 --> 0:05:34.880
<v Speaker 1>you get the feeling that it was worth shock value.

0:05:35.640 --> 0:05:41.880
<v Speaker 1>So can you describe her to me? Physically beautiful Indian, petite,

0:05:42.240 --> 0:05:49.919
<v Speaker 1>dark shiny hair, glossy, light, dark skinned and so and

0:05:50.040 --> 0:05:54.680
<v Speaker 1>you say intelligent? Um, extreme intelligence, not that it was

0:05:54.760 --> 0:05:59.479
<v Speaker 1>always used in the course of her work day. Um,

0:05:59.520 --> 0:06:02.800
<v Speaker 1>because wasn't always into her work. Is the feeling that

0:06:02.839 --> 0:06:05.800
<v Speaker 1>I got. What do you mean by that? She would

0:06:05.839 --> 0:06:09.880
<v Speaker 1>show up, Um, not prepared to work is what I

0:06:09.920 --> 0:06:12.560
<v Speaker 1>would say, not prepared to work and didn't do her

0:06:12.600 --> 0:06:15.840
<v Speaker 1>homework in order to do her work. Did you get

0:06:15.880 --> 0:06:19.200
<v Speaker 1>the feeling that she wanted to be a doctor? Absolutely not.

0:06:19.480 --> 0:06:21.839
<v Speaker 1>She did not, and actually she had voiced it to

0:06:21.880 --> 0:06:26.159
<v Speaker 1>me on many occasions. Kind of felt pushed into it. Um,

0:06:26.200 --> 0:06:30.640
<v Speaker 1>maybe there's some other social pressures, family pressures. I'm not sure,

0:06:31.000 --> 0:06:33.200
<v Speaker 1>but she kind of felt pushed into it and didn't

0:06:33.240 --> 0:06:35.040
<v Speaker 1>feel it was a good fit for her. She's more

0:06:35.080 --> 0:06:38.320
<v Speaker 1>on the artistic side, you see, artistic side. Was she

0:06:38.360 --> 0:06:42.400
<v Speaker 1>into painting? Writing? What was she into writing? Beautifully? Writing?

0:06:42.520 --> 0:06:46.920
<v Speaker 1>Also drawing, sketching things like that? Did she ever make

0:06:46.960 --> 0:06:50.039
<v Speaker 1>you any art? She didn't make me art, but she

0:06:50.160 --> 0:06:52.760
<v Speaker 1>was very generous and the fact that I'm not a

0:06:52.760 --> 0:06:55.240
<v Speaker 1>good writer, so she volunteered and invited me to her

0:06:55.240 --> 0:06:59.960
<v Speaker 1>apartment to help me with one of a writing assignment

0:07:00.000 --> 0:07:03.560
<v Speaker 1>it that I needed for a type of application. So

0:07:03.640 --> 0:07:06.600
<v Speaker 1>did she edit for you or well? I basically told

0:07:06.600 --> 0:07:09.000
<v Speaker 1>her what I wanted to say, and the way that

0:07:09.040 --> 0:07:12.200
<v Speaker 1>she had of writing it was a very poetic, you know,

0:07:12.400 --> 0:07:16.680
<v Speaker 1>almost like pros. Did she tell you at any point

0:07:16.760 --> 0:07:21.760
<v Speaker 1>that she was thinking about quitting medicine? The feeling I got,

0:07:21.880 --> 0:07:23.960
<v Speaker 1>and then in addition to the things she'd say about

0:07:23.960 --> 0:07:26.920
<v Speaker 1>I don't want to be here, gave me the idea

0:07:27.000 --> 0:07:30.040
<v Speaker 1>that she wishes there were way out but kind of

0:07:30.080 --> 0:07:32.160
<v Speaker 1>feeling trapped, and she was like, I don't want to

0:07:32.160 --> 0:07:36.040
<v Speaker 1>be here. So it's almost like I understood it as

0:07:36.040 --> 0:07:40.840
<v Speaker 1>she's feeling trapped for whatever reason. Um, what do you

0:07:40.880 --> 0:07:46.960
<v Speaker 1>think happened to her? It's my opinion. It's always been

0:07:46.960 --> 0:07:50.120
<v Speaker 1>my opinion since I heard about nine eleven and I

0:07:50.400 --> 0:07:54.160
<v Speaker 1>had seen some documentary on television and I thought, Oh,

0:07:54.320 --> 0:07:57.360
<v Speaker 1>she finally got what she wanted. She got away. I

0:07:57.400 --> 0:07:59.800
<v Speaker 1>feel like she was unhappy in her marriage. Just that

0:08:00.120 --> 0:08:04.960
<v Speaker 1>my opinion based on her actions. And I felt like

0:08:05.280 --> 0:08:08.200
<v Speaker 1>she's the type of person that was so so incredibly

0:08:08.280 --> 0:08:11.400
<v Speaker 1>smart that if she wanted something to happen, she could

0:08:11.440 --> 0:08:15.120
<v Speaker 1>make it happen. So, UM, I don't feel like she

0:08:15.240 --> 0:08:17.720
<v Speaker 1>was a victim of nine eleven, but that's just my opinion.

0:08:17.920 --> 0:08:21.720
<v Speaker 1>I feel like she may be alive somewhere. Do you

0:08:21.760 --> 0:08:25.800
<v Speaker 1>think she had the intelligence to just pull something like that?

0:08:25.880 --> 0:08:30.760
<v Speaker 1>Off on the spot and then some how many people

0:08:30.800 --> 0:08:32.959
<v Speaker 1>have you met in your life that you would say

0:08:33.280 --> 0:08:36.120
<v Speaker 1>had that kind of ability? If you're you're smart, you're

0:08:36.120 --> 0:08:39.439
<v Speaker 1>a doctor, I would say maybe three, and she was

0:08:39.480 --> 0:08:42.760
<v Speaker 1>one of the three, right, Like a genius mind, you know,

0:08:44.120 --> 0:08:46.480
<v Speaker 1>I guess to to kind of dig a little bit

0:08:46.480 --> 0:08:50.000
<v Speaker 1>into that when you say a genius mind, are really intelligent? Again,

0:08:50.080 --> 0:08:52.959
<v Speaker 1>you know, let's say all doctors are intelligent, but obviously

0:08:53.040 --> 0:08:56.439
<v Speaker 1>around a lot of intelligent, smart people. Very different when

0:08:56.440 --> 0:08:59.760
<v Speaker 1>I say intelligence, and I also say like socially, she

0:09:00.000 --> 0:09:03.800
<v Speaker 1>would read the room. She could read people. Um. I

0:09:03.840 --> 0:09:06.120
<v Speaker 1>feel like when a person can read people, you're able

0:09:06.160 --> 0:09:10.760
<v Speaker 1>to manipulate them if you want to. So, yes, the

0:09:10.840 --> 0:09:14.400
<v Speaker 1>ability to get things done that she wanted done very persuasive.

0:09:15.640 --> 0:09:17.840
<v Speaker 1>Did you know her as a friend or was it

0:09:17.880 --> 0:09:22.679
<v Speaker 1>purely professional? Both? Like I wouldn't say friend friend but acquaintance.

0:09:22.720 --> 0:09:25.839
<v Speaker 1>I mean, she's a very kind person. She was nice

0:09:25.840 --> 0:09:30.160
<v Speaker 1>to me, generous, um. But we didn't spend much time

0:09:30.200 --> 0:09:33.360
<v Speaker 1>together outside the office, so to speak. But the time

0:09:33.400 --> 0:09:36.040
<v Speaker 1>we did spend it was nice. Did she have a

0:09:36.040 --> 0:09:39.360
<v Speaker 1>lot of friends, like I had said earlier, a bit

0:09:39.400 --> 0:09:43.040
<v Speaker 1>of a loner? I know she was married, So sometimes

0:09:43.800 --> 0:09:46.760
<v Speaker 1>doctors in residency don't hang out with other residents as

0:09:46.840 --> 0:09:50.320
<v Speaker 1>much if they're married. So you didn't know like any

0:09:50.360 --> 0:09:53.720
<v Speaker 1>anyone that you guys mutually knew was like a close

0:09:53.760 --> 0:09:56.920
<v Speaker 1>friend of hers or I really, if you asked me

0:09:56.960 --> 0:09:59.520
<v Speaker 1>to name her best friend, I wouldn't have a clue.

0:10:00.320 --> 0:10:03.240
<v Speaker 1>So what was she like at work as a resident?

0:10:03.280 --> 0:10:07.360
<v Speaker 1>What were her duties? And well, how good was she

0:10:07.480 --> 0:10:11.320
<v Speaker 1>at her job? I feel like she was efficient and

0:10:11.400 --> 0:10:13.720
<v Speaker 1>she got her job done, but it was in a

0:10:13.760 --> 0:10:17.840
<v Speaker 1>troubled way in my opinion, because sometimes, like I said,

0:10:17.880 --> 0:10:20.520
<v Speaker 1>she would show up to work and not prepared, but

0:10:20.600 --> 0:10:22.679
<v Speaker 1>she was always able to do what she wanted to

0:10:22.720 --> 0:10:25.160
<v Speaker 1>do in a quick amount of time. So other doctors

0:10:25.160 --> 0:10:28.440
<v Speaker 1>may all take all day to get it done and

0:10:28.559 --> 0:10:31.120
<v Speaker 1>she'd be in and out. She is efficient when she

0:10:31.200 --> 0:10:34.520
<v Speaker 1>wanted to be. When you say not prepared, what did

0:10:34.559 --> 0:10:39.840
<v Speaker 1>you personally witness I witnessed alcohol in her breath and

0:10:39.920 --> 0:10:44.400
<v Speaker 1>one occasion and had to send her home only one time.

0:10:45.000 --> 0:10:49.640
<v Speaker 1>That occasion was regarding alcohol. Other occasions were just really

0:10:49.679 --> 0:10:54.319
<v Speaker 1>ill prepared. Um, did you get the feeling or did

0:10:54.360 --> 0:10:58.120
<v Speaker 1>you have knowledge that she dealt with mental illness and

0:10:58.360 --> 0:11:03.720
<v Speaker 1>or sustained substance of use. I believe that there could

0:11:03.720 --> 0:11:07.320
<v Speaker 1>have been some besides the alcohol. I don't have any

0:11:07.360 --> 0:11:11.600
<v Speaker 1>proof of that. Did you get the feeling that she

0:11:11.679 --> 0:11:15.040
<v Speaker 1>was happy at Gabrini No? No, Like I said earlier,

0:11:15.120 --> 0:11:19.600
<v Speaker 1>definitely not. And it became more obvious as the year

0:11:19.679 --> 0:11:22.640
<v Speaker 1>went on. You know, it's early in the beginning. Everybody's

0:11:22.679 --> 0:11:27.079
<v Speaker 1>kind of excited. It became very obvious that if she

0:11:27.120 --> 0:11:29.240
<v Speaker 1>would either show up light or she would show up

0:11:29.280 --> 0:11:31.720
<v Speaker 1>with alcohol in her breath at one time, but that

0:11:31.800 --> 0:11:35.000
<v Speaker 1>was on the time eye witnessed. I don't know. I

0:11:35.040 --> 0:11:38.560
<v Speaker 1>know there were of other issues, like in an academic

0:11:38.679 --> 0:11:44.520
<v Speaker 1>nature and also um inappropriate behavior the chief residents were

0:11:44.559 --> 0:11:46.880
<v Speaker 1>called I'm aware of, but I don't have the details.

0:11:46.920 --> 0:11:51.480
<v Speaker 1>Just inappropriate behavior towards attending staff, like male attending staff.

0:11:51.800 --> 0:11:56.079
<v Speaker 1>I know that we were called, UH to also get involved,

0:11:56.480 --> 0:12:00.760
<v Speaker 1>and when attending physician UH felt very uncomfortable on at

0:12:00.800 --> 0:12:04.440
<v Speaker 1>her advances and we had to ask her to leave

0:12:04.480 --> 0:12:09.480
<v Speaker 1>the office. Was that something that you saw repeatedly? So

0:12:09.720 --> 0:12:13.240
<v Speaker 1>these are isolated incidents, but more than one, so I

0:12:13.240 --> 0:12:16.199
<v Speaker 1>don't know, not multiply, you know, more than one, Huh.

0:12:17.000 --> 0:12:20.959
<v Speaker 1>So one of the allegations after she disappeared was that

0:12:21.200 --> 0:12:24.640
<v Speaker 1>she was having affairs, that she was sleeping with men,

0:12:24.720 --> 0:12:28.600
<v Speaker 1>sleeping with women. Um, did she ever confide in you

0:12:28.679 --> 0:12:32.520
<v Speaker 1>or did you ever see anything to substantiate any of that? Well,

0:12:32.640 --> 0:12:35.559
<v Speaker 1>I felt on one occasion that she was very sexual

0:12:35.640 --> 0:12:39.720
<v Speaker 1>towards me in an inappropriate way for our relationship. And

0:12:39.840 --> 0:12:45.160
<v Speaker 1>in addition, my husband at the time also felt like

0:12:45.280 --> 0:12:48.199
<v Speaker 1>she was being very sexual towards him on one occasion

0:12:48.280 --> 0:12:52.360
<v Speaker 1>and including one of his friends. So there were a

0:12:52.400 --> 0:12:57.160
<v Speaker 1>couple occasions where she was just completely inappropriate. Can you

0:12:57.200 --> 0:13:00.960
<v Speaker 1>elaborate just what we wish witnessed? You know what we

0:13:01.000 --> 0:13:03.760
<v Speaker 1>witnessed our time with her, Like I said, just being

0:13:04.240 --> 0:13:08.559
<v Speaker 1>sexual or making sexual advances towards married men, and another

0:13:09.960 --> 0:13:13.480
<v Speaker 1>towards you towards your ex husband. What specifically, though, are

0:13:13.520 --> 0:13:17.240
<v Speaker 1>you comfortable saying or he did not go into detail

0:13:17.280 --> 0:13:22.080
<v Speaker 1>about he was very upset about it and towards you. Yeah,

0:13:22.120 --> 0:13:27.760
<v Speaker 1>I'd rather not to say. So. You your gut feeling

0:13:27.840 --> 0:13:33.000
<v Speaker 1>is that she is alive, absolutely, Like I don't. I

0:13:33.200 --> 0:13:36.800
<v Speaker 1>just uh, maybe there's a tiny part left that I

0:13:36.840 --> 0:13:39.479
<v Speaker 1>would think maybe she's not. It would be really unfortunate.

0:13:40.400 --> 0:13:45.839
<v Speaker 1>She was a talent um, but I just knowing her personality,

0:13:46.440 --> 0:13:51.160
<v Speaker 1>I came to that conclusion. If she is somehow magically

0:13:51.160 --> 0:13:53.439
<v Speaker 1>out there listening to this, what would you tell her?

0:13:54.640 --> 0:13:56.800
<v Speaker 1>I hope she's happy. That's what I would tell her.

0:13:56.840 --> 0:14:00.839
<v Speaker 1>I hope she's happy. It really blew me away that

0:14:01.080 --> 0:14:05.720
<v Speaker 1>Dr E, a logical, intelligent person who knew snay who

0:14:05.760 --> 0:14:11.160
<v Speaker 1>supervised her, thinks she's alive. She's not alone. Every single

0:14:11.240 --> 0:14:14.199
<v Speaker 1>person I interviewed, and I mean every person who knew

0:14:14.240 --> 0:14:18.000
<v Speaker 1>snay Ha personally accept her family told me they don't

0:14:18.040 --> 0:14:21.600
<v Speaker 1>think nine eleven is the answer. They blame either foul

0:14:21.640 --> 0:14:24.920
<v Speaker 1>play or they think she ran away and is alive.

0:14:50.480 --> 0:14:52.920
<v Speaker 1>In June of two thousand one, there was an incident

0:14:53.160 --> 0:14:57.320
<v Speaker 1>where the police were called to a bar where snay

0:14:57.400 --> 0:15:01.720
<v Speaker 1>Ha and um, one of your colleagues, we're out with

0:15:01.800 --> 0:15:05.160
<v Speaker 1>a group from Cabrini. Were you there? It was not No.

0:15:05.440 --> 0:15:08.960
<v Speaker 1>I just I'm aware of the incident though, and so

0:15:09.520 --> 0:15:12.760
<v Speaker 1>the allegation that snay How made was that your colleague

0:15:12.880 --> 0:15:17.200
<v Speaker 1>assaulted her, and then she recanted that allegation. Obviously I

0:15:17.240 --> 0:15:21.080
<v Speaker 1>wasn't there, so I feel uncomfortable passing any kind of

0:15:21.200 --> 0:15:23.400
<v Speaker 1>judgment whether or not it was true, but she recanted

0:15:23.400 --> 0:15:25.960
<v Speaker 1>to the police and then she was charged um with

0:15:26.040 --> 0:15:30.560
<v Speaker 1>making a false accusation. Do you have any doubt that

0:15:30.600 --> 0:15:34.040
<v Speaker 1>the accusation was false? You believe at all? Do you

0:15:34.360 --> 0:15:36.760
<v Speaker 1>believe the allegation that she made that she was assaulted

0:15:36.760 --> 0:15:39.840
<v Speaker 1>by your colleague? No, I don't. I don't. I just

0:15:39.920 --> 0:15:43.440
<v Speaker 1>don't believe it because the person that she was accusing

0:15:43.520 --> 0:15:47.240
<v Speaker 1>at the time was a close personal friend as well

0:15:47.280 --> 0:15:52.080
<v Speaker 1>as colleague. So that being said, knowing the personality types,

0:15:52.160 --> 0:15:54.760
<v Speaker 1>what would be more apt to happen? Would I say

0:15:54.840 --> 0:15:59.040
<v Speaker 1>that it was probably a false statement. On June one,

0:15:59.200 --> 0:16:03.640
<v Speaker 1>two thousand only eight two days before eleven, snay went

0:16:03.680 --> 0:16:08.160
<v Speaker 1>out with co workers to a bar near Cabrini. At

0:16:08.200 --> 0:16:11.440
<v Speaker 1>the bar, she said one of her male supervisors followed

0:16:11.480 --> 0:16:14.680
<v Speaker 1>her into a bathroom, pushed himself onto her, and tried

0:16:14.720 --> 0:16:19.160
<v Speaker 1>to kiss her. She said that she shoved the doctor away. Coincidentally,

0:16:19.400 --> 0:16:22.960
<v Speaker 1>at the time, snay Haw, the doctor ron, and the

0:16:23.040 --> 0:16:27.080
<v Speaker 1>doctor's wife all lived in the same apartment building, a

0:16:27.120 --> 0:16:31.000
<v Speaker 1>building for medical residents. They actually lived on the same floor,

0:16:31.480 --> 0:16:34.000
<v Speaker 1>according to the n y p D. The night of

0:16:34.040 --> 0:16:37.360
<v Speaker 1>the alleged assault, snayhow went back to the doctor's apartment,

0:16:37.640 --> 0:16:41.120
<v Speaker 1>pushed open his door, sat on his couch, and refused

0:16:41.240 --> 0:16:45.280
<v Speaker 1>to leave. The Next day, after filing an official complaint,

0:16:45.520 --> 0:16:49.640
<v Speaker 1>she allegedly called the doctor's wife three times, despite repeated

0:16:49.680 --> 0:16:53.280
<v Speaker 1>request that she stopped calling. According to the n y

0:16:53.400 --> 0:16:56.320
<v Speaker 1>p D, a few days after that, snay Haaw called

0:16:56.320 --> 0:17:00.280
<v Speaker 1>the doctor five times at work. She said, and this

0:17:00.360 --> 0:17:02.880
<v Speaker 1>is written in all caps and the report I obtained

0:17:03.200 --> 0:17:05.800
<v Speaker 1>quote if you don't want to speak to me, I'm

0:17:05.840 --> 0:17:07.439
<v Speaker 1>going to funk you up when I see you in

0:17:07.480 --> 0:17:13.560
<v Speaker 1>the street. Finally, according to NYPD records, on June two one,

0:17:13.880 --> 0:17:18.320
<v Speaker 1>five days after the alleged assault, snay recanted. She told

0:17:18.320 --> 0:17:22.320
<v Speaker 1>a detective that quote, she was not sexually abused. This

0:17:22.400 --> 0:17:25.800
<v Speaker 1>is why I'm not naming the doctors say accused of assault.

0:17:26.240 --> 0:17:28.119
<v Speaker 1>I did reach out to him, but he did not

0:17:28.240 --> 0:17:33.359
<v Speaker 1>respond to interview requests anyway. After snayha recanted, she was

0:17:33.480 --> 0:17:36.880
<v Speaker 1>charged with one count of second degree criminal trustpass, two

0:17:36.880 --> 0:17:40.080
<v Speaker 1>counts of second degree aggravated harassment, one count of third

0:17:40.080 --> 0:17:43.440
<v Speaker 1>degree assault, one count of third degree falsely reporting an incident,

0:17:43.720 --> 0:17:47.960
<v Speaker 1>and three counts of second degree harassment. D NYPD arrested

0:17:48.000 --> 0:17:52.040
<v Speaker 1>snay Haa. She spent one night in jail. This is

0:17:52.080 --> 0:17:55.960
<v Speaker 1>when Ron and snay Ha hired attorney Mark Friedberg. This

0:17:56.040 --> 0:17:59.200
<v Speaker 1>is why Sna was in criminal court on the morning

0:17:59.200 --> 0:18:03.040
<v Speaker 1>of September ten, two thousand one, hours before she disappeared.

0:18:03.320 --> 0:18:07.200
<v Speaker 1>DIDNA have any enemies? I don't know of any. I

0:18:07.480 --> 0:18:12.080
<v Speaker 1>wouldn't know, but nobody from any kind of advances or

0:18:12.160 --> 0:18:15.040
<v Speaker 1>anything that happened at the with anybody at Cabrini. Who

0:18:15.040 --> 0:18:18.879
<v Speaker 1>would have I mean, for example, like what your colleague

0:18:19.040 --> 0:18:23.879
<v Speaker 1>who she accused, could be considered an enemy, right, No,

0:18:24.119 --> 0:18:26.479
<v Speaker 1>I wouldn't. He's the type of person that you know

0:18:26.840 --> 0:18:28.919
<v Speaker 1>is above a law. I mean, not above law, is

0:18:29.000 --> 0:18:32.239
<v Speaker 1>by the law. And um. What I would say is

0:18:32.480 --> 0:18:34.760
<v Speaker 1>he's kind of straight and narrow. That's what I mean,

0:18:34.840 --> 0:18:38.400
<v Speaker 1>like by the law, not a law. Um. And so

0:18:38.480 --> 0:18:40.960
<v Speaker 1>I feel like once it's something is resolved that he

0:18:41.000 --> 0:18:44.119
<v Speaker 1>would move on because he was more career oriented than

0:18:45.119 --> 0:18:48.200
<v Speaker 1>did he tell you that? Did he describe what happened?

0:18:48.200 --> 0:18:50.360
<v Speaker 1>Did he was? He really upset at the whole thing.

0:18:50.800 --> 0:18:54.280
<v Speaker 1>I did not get the details. I just remember him

0:18:54.400 --> 0:18:58.080
<v Speaker 1>confiding to me that he had these allegations against him

0:18:58.280 --> 0:19:01.400
<v Speaker 1>snake House housemend Ron late her said she was miserable

0:19:01.480 --> 0:19:04.880
<v Speaker 1>at Cabrini In May two thousand one, Cabrini let her

0:19:04.880 --> 0:19:09.359
<v Speaker 1>contract expire. Technically she wasn't fired, but for all intents

0:19:09.359 --> 0:19:12.840
<v Speaker 1>and purposes, she was. One of the things that uh

0:19:13.520 --> 0:19:17.119
<v Speaker 1>Snaeha and Ron said after something how left Cabrini was

0:19:17.160 --> 0:19:22.160
<v Speaker 1>that there was an issue of racism and sexism at Cabrini,

0:19:22.200 --> 0:19:26.800
<v Speaker 1>that it was very much a male dominated place, and

0:19:26.880 --> 0:19:30.359
<v Speaker 1>that they felt, in part that her contract was not

0:19:30.480 --> 0:19:33.960
<v Speaker 1>renewed um out of a sense of racism towards her

0:19:34.080 --> 0:19:37.159
<v Speaker 1>and possibly a sense of sexism. Did you did you

0:19:37.200 --> 0:19:39.720
<v Speaker 1>see that? Do you do you think there's any legitimacy

0:19:39.760 --> 0:19:43.680
<v Speaker 1>to that claim? I can't think of anything further from

0:19:43.680 --> 0:19:47.920
<v Speaker 1>the truth. I actually recall, first of all, I think

0:19:47.960 --> 0:19:50.800
<v Speaker 1>there were two female chief residents in one male, so

0:19:50.840 --> 0:19:55.280
<v Speaker 1>that's not male damnonate dominated. And then also the residency

0:19:55.359 --> 0:20:03.000
<v Speaker 1>staff included vast ray you know, a different cultures and

0:20:03.760 --> 0:20:07.600
<v Speaker 1>different races. Um. I remember just one instance after nine eleven,

0:20:07.600 --> 0:20:10.400
<v Speaker 1>and there was a guy from Afghanistan and the staff

0:20:10.480 --> 0:20:13.960
<v Speaker 1>just enveloped him and hugged him and baked cookies for him,

0:20:13.960 --> 0:20:18.360
<v Speaker 1>and you know, just absolutely the opposite. You know, there

0:20:18.400 --> 0:20:21.480
<v Speaker 1>were so many different races a lot of Hispanics though

0:20:22.040 --> 0:20:26.840
<v Speaker 1>people from Puerto Rico as well. Um, I cannot remember.

0:20:27.000 --> 0:20:29.280
<v Speaker 1>And also I was kind of in awe of that

0:20:29.440 --> 0:20:32.320
<v Speaker 1>at this place was very cohesive. People just kind of

0:20:32.400 --> 0:20:36.040
<v Speaker 1>rallied around each other. And you didn't see the clicks

0:20:36.280 --> 0:20:38.760
<v Speaker 1>that I had seen in other either groups or offices

0:20:38.880 --> 0:20:41.439
<v Speaker 1>or hospitals, and you might see, like, you know, this

0:20:41.520 --> 0:20:45.520
<v Speaker 1>group stays together, this nationality stays together. It was completely

0:20:45.920 --> 0:20:50.200
<v Speaker 1>the opposite. So you are working there as a woman

0:20:50.240 --> 0:20:53.560
<v Speaker 1>in a supervisory capacity. You didn't have any issues none.

0:20:54.320 --> 0:20:56.639
<v Speaker 1>Did you ever meet her husband? Raw just a couple

0:20:56.640 --> 0:20:59.720
<v Speaker 1>of times, like very briefly, Like I couldn't really comment

0:20:59.800 --> 0:21:02.159
<v Speaker 1>one on him except for his appearance kind of a

0:21:02.200 --> 0:21:06.840
<v Speaker 1>little bit shy. So she seemed very outgoing and cool,

0:21:06.920 --> 0:21:10.399
<v Speaker 1>and he was kind of what quiet, quiet, shy, maybe

0:21:10.400 --> 0:21:16.480
<v Speaker 1>a little nerdy to me? Smart? Smart? Did stay, however,

0:21:16.560 --> 0:21:19.120
<v Speaker 1>confide anything else in you? Did she talk about her family?

0:21:19.280 --> 0:21:22.080
<v Speaker 1>Did she do? I know it's been twenty years and

0:21:22.800 --> 0:21:24.480
<v Speaker 1>it's it's been a while now, but do you have

0:21:24.480 --> 0:21:28.200
<v Speaker 1>any clear memories. I just remember her confiding in me

0:21:28.600 --> 0:21:33.000
<v Speaker 1>about not being happy in her current position, feeling pressured,

0:21:33.040 --> 0:21:35.159
<v Speaker 1>whether there was pressure or not from her family, but

0:21:35.240 --> 0:21:38.080
<v Speaker 1>feeling pressured to become a doctor and then realizing she

0:21:38.119 --> 0:21:41.280
<v Speaker 1>didn't really want to become one is what she confided

0:21:41.320 --> 0:21:44.760
<v Speaker 1>in me. Also about in her marriage, she just she

0:21:44.880 --> 0:21:49.080
<v Speaker 1>wasn't that happy. I didn't get many details, just not

0:21:49.960 --> 0:21:54.080
<v Speaker 1>feeling like that was maybe the one. Did she ever

0:21:54.160 --> 0:21:57.760
<v Speaker 1>tell you that she was thinking about leaving or running off? No,

0:21:58.160 --> 0:22:01.600
<v Speaker 1>so she never did give me any future plans. But

0:22:02.440 --> 0:22:09.520
<v Speaker 1>I did see an increase in UM, irregular behavior, inappropriate behavior,

0:22:09.600 --> 0:22:12.000
<v Speaker 1>So it was like from zero and then just kept

0:22:12.200 --> 0:22:16.640
<v Speaker 1>increasing over the last few months before she left. Uh

0:22:16.640 --> 0:22:21.160
<v Speaker 1>like a person you might call a person who's um

0:22:21.200 --> 0:22:24.880
<v Speaker 1>a little bit chaotic or maybe not have everything together,

0:22:26.359 --> 0:22:29.720
<v Speaker 1>who was getting worse. In the middle of our interview,

0:22:30.000 --> 0:22:33.040
<v Speaker 1>Dry pulled out her cell phone, dialed her ex husband

0:22:33.240 --> 0:22:37.080
<v Speaker 1>and put him on speaker. I asked him about snay Haa.

0:22:37.400 --> 0:22:40.480
<v Speaker 1>His description was so similar to Dr Ease that I

0:22:40.560 --> 0:22:43.680
<v Speaker 1>suspected they spoke before I got there, But he said

0:22:43.720 --> 0:22:47.359
<v Speaker 1>they didn't. He spoke freely, but didn't want his voice

0:22:47.440 --> 0:22:50.520
<v Speaker 1>to appear on the show, so we're using an actor.

0:22:51.160 --> 0:22:54.760
<v Speaker 1>She was a pretty girl. I think she was trying

0:22:54.760 --> 0:22:57.840
<v Speaker 1>to escape the life that she had. I don't think

0:22:57.880 --> 0:23:00.520
<v Speaker 1>she was happy with her life at that point, meaning

0:23:01.160 --> 0:23:03.439
<v Speaker 1>not that she would take her life, but almost like

0:23:03.480 --> 0:23:06.199
<v Speaker 1>someone who's forced to do something like maybe become a

0:23:06.240 --> 0:23:11.159
<v Speaker 1>doctor and married, and just wasn't happy in everything that

0:23:11.240 --> 0:23:14.280
<v Speaker 1>was going on in her world at the time. He

0:23:14.520 --> 0:23:17.199
<v Speaker 1>and doctor He lived in an apartment building across the

0:23:17.240 --> 0:23:21.240
<v Speaker 1>street from Ron and Snah. He said repeatedly that Snayhouse

0:23:21.240 --> 0:23:24.760
<v Speaker 1>seemed unhappy. I've always worked in sales my whole life

0:23:25.320 --> 0:23:30.119
<v Speaker 1>and am very much a people person, and I read

0:23:30.160 --> 0:23:32.840
<v Speaker 1>that right away on her. I just remember her not

0:23:32.880 --> 0:23:36.720
<v Speaker 1>being happy with her life, and I know she disappeared.

0:23:37.040 --> 0:23:39.080
<v Speaker 1>I'm not saying that she I don't think she would

0:23:39.119 --> 0:23:42.080
<v Speaker 1>take her life. She wasn't that type of unhappy. More,

0:23:42.240 --> 0:23:44.720
<v Speaker 1>she just wanted to change her life. She wanted to

0:23:44.800 --> 0:23:48.919
<v Speaker 1>change a big change, a major change. And do I

0:23:48.960 --> 0:23:51.320
<v Speaker 1>think she was suicidal or anything like that because she

0:23:51.400 --> 0:23:54.960
<v Speaker 1>was unhappy, Absolutely not. I think she loved life, she

0:23:55.160 --> 0:23:57.840
<v Speaker 1>just wasn't happy with the type of work, just her

0:23:57.840 --> 0:24:00.600
<v Speaker 1>whole situation at that point in her life, in that

0:24:00.640 --> 0:24:03.439
<v Speaker 1>time frame. I kind of thought when she disappeared, I

0:24:03.440 --> 0:24:05.919
<v Speaker 1>thought maybe she had done that on purpose, because it

0:24:05.960 --> 0:24:09.720
<v Speaker 1>was a way out. The last time he and dry saw.

0:24:09.800 --> 0:24:13.160
<v Speaker 1>Snay Ha was around May two thousand one when snay

0:24:13.160 --> 0:24:17.320
<v Speaker 1>House contract that Cabrini ended. After Cabrini, snay Hawk got

0:24:17.320 --> 0:24:20.280
<v Speaker 1>a job at St. Vincent's medical Center on Staten Island,

0:24:20.520 --> 0:24:23.520
<v Speaker 1>where she worked for only ten weeks before nine eleven.

0:24:24.000 --> 0:24:28.280
<v Speaker 1>According to retired NYPD detective Richard Stark, snay has struggled

0:24:28.280 --> 0:24:31.679
<v Speaker 1>there too. By nine eleven, he said she was on

0:24:31.880 --> 0:24:36.320
<v Speaker 1>modified duty. This is yet another point of contention between

0:24:36.359 --> 0:24:40.080
<v Speaker 1>snay House family and the NYPD. Ron said that snay

0:24:40.119 --> 0:24:43.760
<v Speaker 1>Ha was happy at St. Vincent's, everything was fine. As

0:24:43.760 --> 0:24:47.119
<v Speaker 1>to her mental health, he testified that she was not depressed,

0:24:47.520 --> 0:24:51.119
<v Speaker 1>but he also testified that sna was seeing a therapist,

0:24:51.640 --> 0:24:55.320
<v Speaker 1>and on September two thousand one, when he filed a

0:24:55.320 --> 0:24:59.480
<v Speaker 1>complaint with the NYPD, Ron immediately noted that Snayhau was

0:24:59.520 --> 0:25:02.639
<v Speaker 1>taking to Russian medication and that she was a victim

0:25:02.680 --> 0:25:07.640
<v Speaker 1>of sexual assault, indicating he was worried about her mental state. Later,

0:25:07.920 --> 0:25:11.159
<v Speaker 1>he testified that right after nine eleven he looked for

0:25:11.160 --> 0:25:16.200
<v Speaker 1>snay and psychiatric institutions because quote, maybe she saw something

0:25:16.240 --> 0:25:20.200
<v Speaker 1>that just damaged her mind. On the other hand, Ken

0:25:20.200 --> 0:25:23.919
<v Speaker 1>go ont Ron's a private investigator testified that he found

0:25:24.000 --> 0:25:27.840
<v Speaker 1>quote no information that Miss Philip was depressed or upset.

0:25:29.560 --> 0:25:34.160
<v Speaker 1>It's hard, maybe even impossible, to reconcile these statements. Say

0:25:34.520 --> 0:25:37.600
<v Speaker 1>was happy, she was seeing a therapist, she was in

0:25:37.640 --> 0:25:41.320
<v Speaker 1>a good place mentally, she was on depression meds. She

0:25:41.480 --> 0:25:44.960
<v Speaker 1>was not suicidal, but her husband searched for her in

0:25:45.000 --> 0:25:49.880
<v Speaker 1>psychiatric hospitals, worried that she saw something eleven that made

0:25:49.880 --> 0:26:20.280
<v Speaker 1>her snap. By Ron's own account, Snay was dealing with depression,

0:26:20.600 --> 0:26:23.720
<v Speaker 1>she was seeing a therapist, and she was taking medication.

0:26:24.160 --> 0:26:27.000
<v Speaker 1>And Ron was concerned enough about snay has mental state

0:26:27.280 --> 0:26:30.800
<v Speaker 1>that he looked for her in psychiatric hospitals. At the

0:26:30.840 --> 0:26:34.000
<v Speaker 1>beginning of this show, I said, there are four possible

0:26:34.080 --> 0:26:37.440
<v Speaker 1>logical explanations as to what may have happened to Snay

0:26:37.480 --> 0:26:43.800
<v Speaker 1>Haaven murder, suicide that she ran off. In my opinion,

0:26:44.160 --> 0:26:48.679
<v Speaker 1>only one can be written off right away. Suicide. It

0:26:48.760 --> 0:26:52.800
<v Speaker 1>makes no sense to me or anyone I interviewed. Snay

0:26:52.840 --> 0:26:56.080
<v Speaker 1>have very well may have been depressed, but I mean

0:26:56.280 --> 0:27:01.439
<v Speaker 1>so are Brazilian other people. Let's say she did die suicide, Well,

0:27:01.600 --> 0:27:05.680
<v Speaker 1>where is her body? She lived in Manhattan. Maybe you're

0:27:05.720 --> 0:27:08.480
<v Speaker 1>thinking she just jumped off a bridge into a river,

0:27:08.840 --> 0:27:12.199
<v Speaker 1>the Hudson or the East. But that makes no sense

0:27:12.480 --> 0:27:16.160
<v Speaker 1>because again, her body was never found, and the bodies

0:27:16.160 --> 0:27:18.480
<v Speaker 1>of people who die by jumping off of bridges in

0:27:18.520 --> 0:27:22.960
<v Speaker 1>New York typically are found. I asked Detective Stark if

0:27:23.000 --> 0:27:26.960
<v Speaker 1>he thinks anything other than nine eleven, including suicide, makes

0:27:27.000 --> 0:27:30.040
<v Speaker 1>any sense today. Do you think there's a possibility that

0:27:30.080 --> 0:27:34.440
<v Speaker 1>there's possibly an alternate explanation other than nine eleven? Do

0:27:34.480 --> 0:27:38.520
<v Speaker 1>you think there's any possibility of suicide, foul play, or

0:27:38.560 --> 0:27:42.120
<v Speaker 1>that she ran off or do you feel personally satisfied

0:27:42.160 --> 0:27:45.560
<v Speaker 1>with eleven as the as the most likely answer? I

0:27:45.600 --> 0:27:48.200
<v Speaker 1>feel personally satisfied at nine eleven because she would have

0:27:48.240 --> 0:27:51.320
<v Speaker 1>turned up by now a DNA, she was found in

0:27:51.359 --> 0:27:54.920
<v Speaker 1>the river, which which is you know, well she went

0:27:54.960 --> 0:27:57.960
<v Speaker 1>in the river, she definitely would have been found. Think

0:27:58.000 --> 0:28:02.080
<v Speaker 1>about what we know. Snay spent the afternoon of the

0:28:02.160 --> 0:28:06.880
<v Speaker 1>day she disappeared repotting orchids, cleaning her apartment and talking

0:28:06.920 --> 0:28:10.040
<v Speaker 1>to her mom via instant messenger. Then she went to

0:28:10.040 --> 0:28:14.399
<v Speaker 1>a department store. After that, what she jumped off a

0:28:14.440 --> 0:28:18.560
<v Speaker 1>bridge and was never found. I don't think so. So Again,

0:28:18.800 --> 0:28:22.439
<v Speaker 1>in my opinion, out of the four possible explanations about

0:28:22.440 --> 0:28:25.480
<v Speaker 1>what could have happened to snay Ha. Suicide is the

0:28:25.480 --> 0:28:31.399
<v Speaker 1>easiest to rule out. September seven, two thousand one, the

0:28:31.480 --> 0:28:36.560
<v Speaker 1>Friday before snay House, mom Onto visits her her apartment

0:28:36.840 --> 0:28:40.040
<v Speaker 1>near the World Trade Center. Ron has to work, so

0:28:40.120 --> 0:28:43.240
<v Speaker 1>snay Ha and Anso hang out all night. They have

0:28:43.440 --> 0:28:47.920
<v Speaker 1>Chinese food, walk around Battery Park, and watch the movie

0:28:48.120 --> 0:28:52.800
<v Speaker 1>The Portrait of a Lady I Should probably never marry.

0:28:53.160 --> 0:28:56.000
<v Speaker 1>Is getting a great deal, but it's giving up other chances.

0:28:56.600 --> 0:29:03.320
<v Speaker 1>Just what usual chances in danger. In the movie, Isabel Archer,

0:29:03.400 --> 0:29:06.560
<v Speaker 1>played by the everluminescent Nicole Kitman, ends up in a

0:29:06.600 --> 0:29:11.240
<v Speaker 1>bad marriage with a man in Florence, Italy. Coincidentally, Florence

0:29:11.320 --> 0:29:14.400
<v Speaker 1>is where lived in the nineties when she took time

0:29:14.400 --> 0:29:17.440
<v Speaker 1>off from med school to paint. It's also where Ron

0:29:17.560 --> 0:29:20.480
<v Speaker 1>proposed to her, and it's where she dreamed of living.

0:29:21.280 --> 0:29:24.520
<v Speaker 1>In the Portrait of a Lady, Isabel's cousin warns her,

0:29:24.720 --> 0:29:28.200
<v Speaker 1>and I'm quoting Wikipedia here that she's quote giving up

0:29:28.200 --> 0:29:31.320
<v Speaker 1>her dreams to be in a cage with a worthless husband.

0:29:31.920 --> 0:29:39.000
<v Speaker 1>In the end, Isabel flees her husband The Portrait of

0:29:39.040 --> 0:29:42.080
<v Speaker 1>a Lady Do You know where you're going, Isabel Archer,

0:29:42.760 --> 0:29:46.720
<v Speaker 1>and I find it very pleasant not to know. After

0:29:46.760 --> 0:29:50.640
<v Speaker 1>the movie, snay On Anzu go to sleep. The next morning,

0:29:50.720 --> 0:29:54.360
<v Speaker 1>around seven or eight am, Ron gets home, Anto sees

0:29:54.400 --> 0:29:58.440
<v Speaker 1>him walks through the door. That day, Ron, snay Ha,

0:29:58.720 --> 0:30:02.000
<v Speaker 1>and Anto talk for a while, then take another walk

0:30:02.080 --> 0:30:07.080
<v Speaker 1>around Battery Park. Then Onto goes home and Ron and

0:30:07.120 --> 0:30:12.400
<v Speaker 1>snay Hawk go to a party where Ron plays guitar. Sunday,

0:30:12.520 --> 0:30:16.960
<v Speaker 1>September nine, forty eight hours until the world changes, Ron

0:30:16.960 --> 0:30:20.400
<v Speaker 1>and Snayhaw roller blade. They start cleaning their apartment and

0:30:20.480 --> 0:30:24.200
<v Speaker 1>snay How uses an entire roll of film to photograph orchids.

0:30:25.040 --> 0:30:27.640
<v Speaker 1>This is how snay Hou's final weekend played out the

0:30:27.720 --> 0:30:31.640
<v Speaker 1>day's leading up to nine and nine eleven. As to

0:30:31.720 --> 0:30:35.760
<v Speaker 1>her state of mind that weekend, two people offered different opinions.

0:30:36.240 --> 0:30:39.760
<v Speaker 1>Snay House mom Onto said that Snayhow was in very

0:30:39.800 --> 0:30:43.840
<v Speaker 1>good spirits, talking about kids and starting a family, but

0:30:43.920 --> 0:30:46.680
<v Speaker 1>one of snay house friends said that she was brooding

0:30:47.120 --> 0:30:51.000
<v Speaker 1>angry with the doctors at Cabrini. So, like so much else,

0:30:51.440 --> 0:30:56.160
<v Speaker 1>contradictions and no clarity. But even if snay Haw was

0:30:56.360 --> 0:31:00.720
<v Speaker 1>brooding and angry, suicide still does not make sense. There's

0:31:00.720 --> 0:31:04.120
<v Speaker 1>no body. That's what this comes down to. So I

0:31:04.160 --> 0:31:09.040
<v Speaker 1>think we can safely rule out suicide. What's harder to

0:31:09.120 --> 0:31:14.680
<v Speaker 1>rule out is foul play. Next time on missing on

0:31:14.760 --> 0:31:18.440
<v Speaker 1>nine eleven, are open that he possibly did something to

0:31:18.560 --> 0:31:20.360
<v Speaker 1>him that was that was on the table too in

0:31:20.360 --> 0:31:25.720
<v Speaker 1>the beginning homework. Did you see or speak with snay

0:31:25.800 --> 0:31:28.800
<v Speaker 1>Haa in the days leading up to nine eleven? If so,

0:31:29.320 --> 0:31:31.760
<v Speaker 1>you can reach us by phone at one eight three

0:31:31.840 --> 0:31:36.000
<v Speaker 1>three new tips that's one eight three three six three

0:31:36.080 --> 0:31:40.600
<v Speaker 1>nine eight four seven seven again one eight three three

0:31:41.000 --> 0:31:44.640
<v Speaker 1>six three nine eight four seven seven, or you can

0:31:44.680 --> 0:31:47.480
<v Speaker 1>reach us via email at tips at I heeart media

0:31:47.560 --> 0:31:50.960
<v Speaker 1>dot com. That's tips T I P s at I

0:31:51.080 --> 0:31:55.160
<v Speaker 1>heeart media dot com. If you're having thoughts about suicide,

0:31:55.360 --> 0:31:59.120
<v Speaker 1>please call the National Suicide Prevention Lifeline at one eight

0:31:59.240 --> 0:32:04.040
<v Speaker 1>hundred two seven three talk. That's one two seven three

0:32:04.480 --> 0:32:08.440
<v Speaker 1>eight to five five. If you can, please donate to

0:32:08.480 --> 0:32:13.160
<v Speaker 1>the lifeline. Go to Suicide Prevention Lifeline dot org slash donate.

0:32:13.720 --> 0:32:18.080
<v Speaker 1>Also in this episode, we discussed the conflict between Snak,

0:32:18.200 --> 0:32:21.640
<v Speaker 1>who said she was sexually assaulted, and the NYPD, who

0:32:21.640 --> 0:32:26.200
<v Speaker 1>said she recanted. Studies show that sometimes sexual assault victims

0:32:26.240 --> 0:32:30.160
<v Speaker 1>we can't under pressure from law enforcement lacking additional information,

0:32:30.440 --> 0:32:32.800
<v Speaker 1>I don't think it's my place to judge either snay

0:32:32.840 --> 0:32:35.880
<v Speaker 1>HAA or the NYPD, which is why I told you

0:32:35.960 --> 0:32:38.880
<v Speaker 1>only what I know what I found in official records.

0:32:39.600 --> 0:32:42.600
<v Speaker 1>Ben Bollen is our executive producer. Paul Decan is our

0:32:42.640 --> 0:32:46.880
<v Speaker 1>supervising producer, Chris Brown is our assistant producer, Seth Nicholas

0:32:46.920 --> 0:32:50.600
<v Speaker 1>Johnson is our producer. Sam T. Garden is our research assistant,

0:32:50.840 --> 0:32:54.040
<v Speaker 1>and I'm your host and executive producer John Walsack. Cover

0:32:54.200 --> 0:32:57.239
<v Speaker 1>art by Pam Peacock. Special thanks to Tamika Campbell at

0:32:57.240 --> 0:33:00.520
<v Speaker 1>iHeart and to Christoph Zappery in New Orleans. So thank

0:33:00.520 --> 0:33:03.320
<v Speaker 1>you to Dr E, her husband, Detective Richard Stark, and

0:33:03.400 --> 0:33:07.120
<v Speaker 1>ASoP Rock. Original theme music by ASoP Rock. Check out

0:33:07.120 --> 0:33:10.960
<v Speaker 1>Asop's website at ASoP rock dot com. Dr E's ex

0:33:11.040 --> 0:33:14.160
<v Speaker 1>husband voiced by Chandler Mays. You can find me on

0:33:14.200 --> 0:33:17.960
<v Speaker 1>Twitter at at John wallzac j O n W A

0:33:18.280 --> 0:33:21.600
<v Speaker 1>L c z A K. If you like this show,

0:33:21.920 --> 0:33:24.720
<v Speaker 1>check out our first season, Missing in Alaska, about the

0:33:24.800 --> 0:33:29.000
<v Speaker 1>nineteen seventy two disappearance of two congressmen. Missing on nine eleven,

0:33:29.120 --> 0:33:37.480
<v Speaker 1>is a co production of I Heart Radio and Greenfork Media.