WEBVTT - Top 5 Spider-Man Scenes | #1074

0:00:21.244 --> 0:00:24.604
<v Speaker 1>Film Spotting is presented by Regal Unlimited, the all you

0:00:24.645 --> 0:00:27.565
<v Speaker 1>can watch movie subscription pass that pays for itself in

0:00:27.685 --> 0:00:31.365
<v Speaker 1>just two visits. See any standard two D movie anytime

0:00:31.725 --> 0:00:34.845
<v Speaker 1>with no blackoutdates or restrictions. Sign up now on the

0:00:34.885 --> 0:00:37.245
<v Speaker 1>Regal app or at the link in our description and

0:00:37.445 --> 0:00:41.685
<v Speaker 1>use code film spot twenty six to receive fifteen percent off.

0:00:42.805 --> 0:00:45.284
<v Speaker 2>What kind of a show you guys putting on here today?

0:00:45.405 --> 0:00:46.524
<v Speaker 1>You're not interested in art?

0:00:46.685 --> 0:00:48.364
<v Speaker 2>Now? No, Look, we're going to do this thing.

0:00:48.364 --> 0:00:48.964
<v Speaker 3>We're going to have a.

0:00:48.965 --> 0:00:54.764
<v Speaker 4>Conversation from Chicago. This is film Spotting. I'm Adam Kembinar

0:00:54.965 --> 0:00:56.084
<v Speaker 4>and I'm Josh Larson.

0:00:56.444 --> 0:01:04.085
<v Speaker 2>You are amazing. Some people don't think so, but you

0:01:04.164 --> 0:01:08.765
<v Speaker 2>are nice style am Do I get to say thank you?

0:01:08.804 --> 0:01:09.324
<v Speaker 2>This time?

0:01:09.804 --> 0:01:13.285
<v Speaker 4>With the world's Spidey sense activated, Marvel's brand new Day

0:01:13.365 --> 0:01:16.164
<v Speaker 4>opens this weekend. We take a look back at twenty

0:01:16.205 --> 0:01:19.045
<v Speaker 4>five years of the Web Slinger on screen with our

0:01:19.084 --> 0:01:20.925
<v Speaker 4>top five Spider Man scenes.

0:01:21.365 --> 0:01:24.884
<v Speaker 1>With no Power comes Great Responsibility, Let's go with that.

0:01:24.885 --> 0:01:27.325
<v Speaker 1>That more ahead on film Spotting.

0:01:34.205 --> 0:01:37.565
<v Speaker 4>Welcome to film Spotting, Josh. We are back from our

0:01:37.685 --> 0:01:43.124
<v Speaker 4>Odysseus review standalone review and our Odyssean Like Adventure, our

0:01:43.205 --> 0:01:46.965
<v Speaker 4>annual trek up to Spring Green and American Players Theater

0:01:47.125 --> 0:01:49.765
<v Speaker 4>saw some great theater, got to hang out with Sam

0:01:49.885 --> 0:01:52.405
<v Speaker 4>on the Wisconsin River, not quite as treacherous as what

0:01:52.445 --> 0:01:53.684
<v Speaker 4>Odysseus had to put up with.

0:01:54.165 --> 0:01:56.965
<v Speaker 1>It wasn't we made it. We survived. No one drifted away.

0:01:57.045 --> 0:01:59.725
<v Speaker 1>I think that's the main danger on that slow river

0:01:59.885 --> 0:02:01.925
<v Speaker 1>is you're not paying attention and before you know it,

0:02:01.965 --> 0:02:04.805
<v Speaker 1>you're one hundred yards down. But that is such a

0:02:04.805 --> 0:02:08.285
<v Speaker 1>beautiful place, and it had been a couple of years

0:02:08.325 --> 0:02:10.245
<v Speaker 1>since Debbie and I were able to get up there

0:02:10.285 --> 0:02:12.484
<v Speaker 1>with you all, so it was so good to be back.

0:02:12.525 --> 0:02:16.125
<v Speaker 1>A lot, a lot had changed all of our kids.

0:02:16.645 --> 0:02:19.365
<v Speaker 1>It's like we're walking around mostly with adults now. Yes,

0:02:20.365 --> 0:02:24.325
<v Speaker 1>and a lot had changed. Apt still doing wonderful theater.

0:02:24.525 --> 0:02:29.325
<v Speaker 1>I think Casey and Diana was maybe the best, certainly

0:02:29.365 --> 0:02:32.245
<v Speaker 1>one of the best productions we've seen I've seen since

0:02:32.245 --> 0:02:35.244
<v Speaker 1>we've been there. And uh, yeah, it was good.

0:02:35.285 --> 0:02:35.845
<v Speaker 4>It was a good time.

0:02:35.845 --> 0:02:38.524
<v Speaker 1>It already feels like it was a month or two ago,

0:02:38.565 --> 0:02:40.244
<v Speaker 1>but I know that's how the summers work.

0:02:40.285 --> 0:02:43.205
<v Speaker 4>I guess it really does. And if you really do

0:02:43.285 --> 0:02:45.404
<v Speaker 4>want to see what it was like on the Wisconsin River. Yes,

0:02:45.405 --> 0:02:48.325
<v Speaker 4>we did post a picture on the Film Spotting and

0:02:48.445 --> 0:02:51.005
<v Speaker 4>Larsen on film social media. Is you got some fine

0:02:51.005 --> 0:02:54.244
<v Speaker 4>feedback on your hat, Josh. Always always play it safe,

0:02:54.245 --> 0:02:58.364
<v Speaker 4>safety first, be prepared. Yes. Later in the show, we

0:02:58.405 --> 0:03:00.285
<v Speaker 4>will have a new poll for you asking you to

0:03:00.445 --> 0:03:04.165
<v Speaker 4>name the definitive Spider Man movie. I am eager to

0:03:04.204 --> 0:03:08.764
<v Speaker 4>see those results. Maybe it will break out along generational lines, Josh,

0:03:08.924 --> 0:03:12.285
<v Speaker 4>maybe it won't. We have a reminder that Film Spotting

0:03:12.325 --> 0:03:14.925
<v Speaker 4>is available as a video podcast. You can watch us

0:03:14.924 --> 0:03:18.605
<v Speaker 4>talk over at YouTube dot com slash film Spotting. We

0:03:18.644 --> 0:03:22.924
<v Speaker 4>are anticipating Spider Man and New Day. This is a film, Josh,

0:03:22.924 --> 0:03:26.405
<v Speaker 4>that you did just see. I believe a night or

0:03:26.445 --> 0:03:29.445
<v Speaker 4>two ago you were able to get to the critic

0:03:29.525 --> 0:03:32.765
<v Speaker 4>screening in Chicago. I am seeing it this weekend. We

0:03:32.805 --> 0:03:35.285
<v Speaker 4>do plan to talk about it next week here on

0:03:35.325 --> 0:03:40.725
<v Speaker 4>Film Spotting. So anticipatory programming, we thought why not look

0:03:40.765 --> 0:03:45.005
<v Speaker 4>back at this entire I was going to say cycle,

0:03:45.005 --> 0:03:48.765
<v Speaker 4>but there's been so many iterations and different studios making movies.

0:03:48.805 --> 0:03:50.165
<v Speaker 4>Of course, we're going to look back at all of

0:03:50.165 --> 0:03:52.045
<v Speaker 4>these Spider Man movies and see if we can cull

0:03:52.125 --> 0:03:55.525
<v Speaker 4>together our individual top five lists. I anticipated that we

0:03:55.565 --> 0:03:58.765
<v Speaker 4>would have some overlap, and it seems that we do,

0:03:59.205 --> 0:04:02.925
<v Speaker 4>and that's fine. I am eager to see where we

0:04:03.045 --> 0:04:05.525
<v Speaker 4>fall on these films and where we fall in terms

0:04:05.525 --> 0:04:08.525
<v Speaker 4>of why we like these individual scenes. So we will

0:04:08.565 --> 0:04:10.925
<v Speaker 4>get to that as we make our way through our list.

0:04:10.965 --> 0:04:15.605
<v Speaker 4>We have our top five Spider Man scenes. Any preface

0:04:16.005 --> 0:04:18.245
<v Speaker 4>to your list, just.

0:04:18.245 --> 0:04:20.885
<v Speaker 1>That this was way easier for me than our super

0:04:21.165 --> 0:04:25.485
<v Speaker 1>Man Moments list, which we just did last summer, and

0:04:25.965 --> 0:04:28.885
<v Speaker 1>the main reason for that. Spider Man has always been

0:04:29.405 --> 0:04:32.005
<v Speaker 1>my superhero. If I were asked to pick the one

0:04:32.045 --> 0:04:36.725
<v Speaker 1>that I followed the longest, been most enamored with, and

0:04:37.205 --> 0:04:39.964
<v Speaker 1>you know I mentioned before on the show, I think

0:04:40.045 --> 0:04:41.445
<v Speaker 1>that when I was a kid, this is who I

0:04:41.445 --> 0:04:43.284
<v Speaker 1>wanted to be, This is who I pretended to be.

0:04:44.245 --> 0:04:47.325
<v Speaker 1>It worked out well that for whatever reason, climbing was

0:04:47.365 --> 0:04:51.325
<v Speaker 1>my thing as a kid. You name it, trees, jungle, gyms, sheds,

0:04:51.765 --> 0:04:53.724
<v Speaker 1>if you could climb, it was I was trying to

0:04:53.765 --> 0:04:58.085
<v Speaker 1>do that. And after seeing Spider Man, yeah, I added

0:04:58.085 --> 0:05:00.244
<v Speaker 1>the walls of our home to that list and would

0:05:00.284 --> 0:05:03.245
<v Speaker 1>try to be Spider Man to my mom's sugar in

0:05:04.245 --> 0:05:08.564
<v Speaker 1>This is probably done while wearing my Spider Man under Rus,

0:05:09.005 --> 0:05:11.285
<v Speaker 1>which I know have been mentioned on the show before.

0:05:11.325 --> 0:05:13.005
<v Speaker 1>Do you think we need to explain under Rus to

0:05:13.365 --> 0:05:14.645
<v Speaker 1>younger generations at this point?

0:05:14.725 --> 0:05:17.685
<v Speaker 4>Adam, It's sad because I don't think they make him anymore, right,

0:05:17.844 --> 0:05:19.565
<v Speaker 4>And they were wonderful.

0:05:19.765 --> 0:05:23.964
<v Speaker 1>They were amazing. Yeah, they late seventies, early eighties, I

0:05:24.005 --> 0:05:28.964
<v Speaker 1>think meant sort of as pajamas or underwear. If yeah,

0:05:29.005 --> 0:05:32.804
<v Speaker 1>they met a T shirt, a T shirt top matching

0:05:32.885 --> 0:05:37.885
<v Speaker 1>bottoms in your favorite superheroes costume. Essentially, what more could

0:05:38.045 --> 0:05:40.765
<v Speaker 1>you know a seven eight year old want. I mean,

0:05:40.805 --> 0:05:44.005
<v Speaker 1>it was just wonderful. So yeah, definitely had spider Man

0:05:44.165 --> 0:05:49.005
<v Speaker 1>under Rus. And I think this was interesting compared to Superman,

0:05:49.325 --> 0:05:51.365
<v Speaker 1>where I had to do a lot of research and

0:05:51.925 --> 0:05:54.245
<v Speaker 1>kind of bring myself up to speed on the history

0:05:54.245 --> 0:05:57.404
<v Speaker 1>of this character. When we talked about doing this list,

0:05:58.045 --> 0:06:02.005
<v Speaker 1>immediately four scenes came to mind, just right in the

0:06:02.045 --> 0:06:04.245
<v Speaker 1>first conversation I had with you know, with family and

0:06:04.725 --> 0:06:07.164
<v Speaker 1>to my head as well. That's rare for me for

0:06:07.245 --> 0:06:09.165
<v Speaker 1>a top five. You know, I'll have one or two

0:06:09.725 --> 0:06:12.845
<v Speaker 1>maybe depending on the topic. And I ended up just

0:06:12.885 --> 0:06:16.484
<v Speaker 1>sticking with those four. I you know, considered others, gave

0:06:16.525 --> 0:06:18.765
<v Speaker 1>it some more thought, but it was one of those

0:06:18.765 --> 0:06:22.604
<v Speaker 1>instances where if it's you know, pop culture personal like this,

0:06:22.844 --> 0:06:25.445
<v Speaker 1>you kind of have to go with what hits you first.

0:06:25.565 --> 0:06:27.404
<v Speaker 1>And then I did a little bit of searching for

0:06:27.485 --> 0:06:30.245
<v Speaker 1>what could be my number five and I wound up

0:06:30.284 --> 0:06:33.005
<v Speaker 1>being a moment that a listener reminded me of that

0:06:34.005 --> 0:06:35.445
<v Speaker 1>I'm happy to make as a pick as well. I

0:06:35.445 --> 0:06:37.724
<v Speaker 1>think it's a great pick. So yeah, this was a

0:06:37.725 --> 0:06:38.125
<v Speaker 1>fun one.

0:06:38.165 --> 0:06:40.765
<v Speaker 4>Basically, I will get into this a little bit more

0:06:40.805 --> 0:06:44.205
<v Speaker 4>as we get into the lists. I did have to

0:06:44.205 --> 0:06:46.805
<v Speaker 4>do one piece of homework. I don't know that I

0:06:46.844 --> 0:06:49.205
<v Speaker 4>should have done this homework, Josh, but I had to

0:06:49.205 --> 0:06:52.085
<v Speaker 4>do one piece of homework because as I was preparing,

0:06:52.685 --> 0:06:55.645
<v Speaker 4>I got a little nervous. I thought, despite my love

0:06:55.925 --> 0:06:59.244
<v Speaker 4>for Spider Man, and I think we've accurately dated ourselves

0:06:59.245 --> 0:07:01.845
<v Speaker 4>here and everyone is clear. But we didn't grow up

0:07:01.885 --> 0:07:04.285
<v Speaker 4>with Spider Man movies. We grew up with Spider Man

0:07:04.365 --> 0:07:07.685
<v Speaker 4>the comic book. We grew up with Spider Man TV shows,

0:07:07.765 --> 0:07:11.205
<v Speaker 4>the animated cartoons, Justice League. So Spider Man was a

0:07:11.245 --> 0:07:16.005
<v Speaker 4>big part of our childhoods. But Superman. We had Superman

0:07:16.245 --> 0:07:20.605
<v Speaker 4>the movie that was the that was the originator of

0:07:20.645 --> 0:07:23.725
<v Speaker 4>a lot of these comic book superhero movies, and that was,

0:07:23.765 --> 0:07:26.605
<v Speaker 4>of course the first one we saw. So I think

0:07:26.645 --> 0:07:28.845
<v Speaker 4>I was a lot like you and that I immediately

0:07:28.925 --> 0:07:32.245
<v Speaker 4>became obsessed with Superman. But then Spider Man came in,

0:07:32.285 --> 0:07:36.485
<v Speaker 4>and there was something about the playfulness of Spider Man.

0:07:36.805 --> 0:07:40.925
<v Speaker 4>There was something about for me, there was the strength

0:07:41.125 --> 0:07:43.445
<v Speaker 4>despite the fact that he was such a live figure,

0:07:43.845 --> 0:07:48.165
<v Speaker 4>but he was so strong, he was so powerful that

0:07:48.165 --> 0:07:50.085
<v Speaker 4>that is something that appealed to me. And who didn't

0:07:50.165 --> 0:07:53.325
<v Speaker 4>want for whatever reason? What was it about web slinging

0:07:53.405 --> 0:07:56.085
<v Speaker 4>that just seems so cool? You just wanted to be

0:07:56.125 --> 0:07:59.605
<v Speaker 4>able to do it because it was it was shooting

0:07:59.685 --> 0:08:03.445
<v Speaker 4>something which as young boys you have to admit we're

0:08:03.525 --> 0:08:07.285
<v Speaker 4>drawn to for whatever reason. But it wasn't It wasn't destructive,

0:08:07.965 --> 0:08:10.285
<v Speaker 4>it wasn't it was a hyper aggressive.

0:08:10.405 --> 0:08:12.485
<v Speaker 1>I think that's it. And part of it is, you know,

0:08:12.565 --> 0:08:15.965
<v Speaker 1>I can remember too, just like swings, just swinging on

0:08:16.565 --> 0:08:18.325
<v Speaker 1>or the like the swing that just had the disc

0:08:18.405 --> 0:08:20.845
<v Speaker 1>on the bottom, so there was a single rope. You know,

0:08:21.285 --> 0:08:23.325
<v Speaker 1>I would rarely be sitting on that, I would be

0:08:23.405 --> 0:08:25.645
<v Speaker 1>hanging on it. And this was probably influenced by seeing

0:08:25.685 --> 0:08:28.765
<v Speaker 1>the Spider Man cartoon or something like that. I think

0:08:28.925 --> 0:08:31.445
<v Speaker 1>as we got a little older, Indiana Jones played into

0:08:31.485 --> 0:08:34.365
<v Speaker 1>this swimming from the whip. Yeah right, It's all sort

0:08:34.365 --> 0:08:38.925
<v Speaker 1>of this same motion that we gravitated towards, and then

0:08:38.965 --> 0:08:42.085
<v Speaker 1>you see this superhero doing it and it's like, oh man.

0:08:42.685 --> 0:08:47.005
<v Speaker 4>I was worried though, because I was thinking we didn't

0:08:47.045 --> 0:08:51.405
<v Speaker 4>even review, or we avoided for a long time reviewing

0:08:52.165 --> 0:08:54.645
<v Speaker 4>one of the last Spider Man movies with Tom Holland,

0:08:54.725 --> 0:08:58.045
<v Speaker 4>and I knew or I was pretty certain I hadn't

0:08:58.085 --> 0:09:00.245
<v Speaker 4>seen at least one of the Andrew Garfield There are

0:09:00.245 --> 0:09:02.645
<v Speaker 4>only two. I knew I hadn't seen at least one

0:09:02.645 --> 0:09:04.245
<v Speaker 4>of the Andrew Garfield movies, and I thought it was

0:09:04.325 --> 0:09:07.525
<v Speaker 4>possible I hadn't seen both of them because I couldn't

0:09:07.564 --> 0:09:10.285
<v Speaker 4>remember either of them. So I'm sitting here going, am

0:09:10.285 --> 0:09:11.645
<v Speaker 4>I just not going to bring up the fact that

0:09:11.684 --> 0:09:13.765
<v Speaker 4>we're doing a top five Spider Man scenes and I

0:09:13.804 --> 0:09:17.084
<v Speaker 4>don't think I've seen like three of these ten movies

0:09:17.205 --> 0:09:21.845
<v Speaker 4>or something. I'm straining credulity here. And then I did

0:09:21.845 --> 0:09:25.285
<v Speaker 4>the research and I realized that I have seen all

0:09:25.325 --> 0:09:28.445
<v Speaker 4>of these movies we did talk about, I think almost

0:09:28.525 --> 0:09:31.804
<v Speaker 4>all of them on the show. The only exception, including

0:09:31.804 --> 0:09:34.805
<v Speaker 4>the Amazing Spider Man the first Garfield Stone that was

0:09:34.885 --> 0:09:37.045
<v Speaker 4>reviewed on the show, and I did see it, just

0:09:37.125 --> 0:09:40.805
<v Speaker 4>have no recollection of it. The only one I did

0:09:40.845 --> 0:09:45.204
<v Speaker 4>not see was the Amazing Spider Man two. So the second,

0:09:45.965 --> 0:09:50.325
<v Speaker 4>the second one with Garfield and Stone rough. I did

0:09:50.325 --> 0:09:53.285
<v Speaker 4>that homework, Josh, and it will come up. It will

0:09:53.285 --> 0:09:55.285
<v Speaker 4>come up in the context of this top five. But no,

0:09:55.365 --> 0:09:58.245
<v Speaker 4>it did not make it did not make my top five.

0:09:58.285 --> 0:10:00.365
<v Speaker 4>I will just leave it at that. So now I

0:10:00.405 --> 0:10:02.365
<v Speaker 4>have now seen all of them. I'm a completist.

0:10:02.804 --> 0:10:06.165
<v Speaker 1>Good on you, good for doing your due diligence. I

0:10:06.205 --> 0:10:08.085
<v Speaker 1>look forward to your letterboxed ranking soon.

0:10:08.804 --> 0:10:13.245
<v Speaker 4>Yes, that is coming next. So let's go ahead and

0:10:13.365 --> 0:10:16.485
<v Speaker 4>jump in your number five Spider Man scene.

0:10:16.605 --> 0:10:20.564
<v Speaker 1>So yeah, this suggestion comes from a longtime listener, Jonathan Anderson,

0:10:20.765 --> 0:10:24.605
<v Speaker 1>and and it comes from Spider Man two, directed by

0:10:25.365 --> 0:10:29.605
<v Speaker 1>Sam Raimie. It's Spider Man being lifted by the crowd

0:10:29.765 --> 0:10:35.405
<v Speaker 1>in the train, and I think that particular moment is

0:10:35.485 --> 0:10:38.925
<v Speaker 1>my pick, the lifting and carrying him, But it works

0:10:38.965 --> 0:10:43.204
<v Speaker 1>because it's prefaced by this great action sequence that Raimi stages.

0:10:43.765 --> 0:10:48.125
<v Speaker 1>They're directly connected. So Toby Maguire here, Spider man's at

0:10:48.165 --> 0:10:50.925
<v Speaker 1>the front of this elevated train, high up above the city.

0:10:50.965 --> 0:10:53.365
<v Speaker 1>It's careening out of control toward the end of the track,

0:10:53.804 --> 0:10:56.765
<v Speaker 1>which essentially the track just ends there, and so if

0:10:56.804 --> 0:11:00.525
<v Speaker 1>you go past it, essentially like a cliff spider. Tries

0:11:00.525 --> 0:11:03.845
<v Speaker 1>a couple of things to stop it, eventually casting webs

0:11:03.925 --> 0:11:06.645
<v Speaker 1>onto the buildings on either side of the tracks and

0:11:06.684 --> 0:11:08.525
<v Speaker 1>then holding them with his arms as he's at the

0:11:08.645 --> 0:11:11.765
<v Speaker 1>very front, kind of turning himself into this human break,

0:11:13.645 --> 0:11:18.965
<v Speaker 1>and the effort nearly kills him. So this is when

0:11:19.005 --> 0:11:23.125
<v Speaker 1>the train stops. He succeeded, but he's completely exhausted and

0:11:23.285 --> 0:11:27.964
<v Speaker 1>loses consciousness and almost falls forward off the platform, and

0:11:27.965 --> 0:11:30.485
<v Speaker 1>that's when the passenger's hands. So the people who are

0:11:30.485 --> 0:11:32.485
<v Speaker 1>in the car they reach out of the broken windows

0:11:32.485 --> 0:11:35.005
<v Speaker 1>at the front of the train, just one and then another,

0:11:35.085 --> 0:11:37.964
<v Speaker 1>another another, and they kind of grab him and hold

0:11:38.005 --> 0:11:41.204
<v Speaker 1>him there, catch him, they save him, and then they

0:11:41.205 --> 0:11:43.684
<v Speaker 1>bring him into the car, pass him over their heads

0:11:43.725 --> 0:11:45.844
<v Speaker 1>to the back of the train where they lay him down.

0:11:46.285 --> 0:11:49.445
<v Speaker 1>He doesn't have his mask on, and so a man observes,

0:11:49.645 --> 0:11:51.405
<v Speaker 1>I think this speaks to a little bit of what

0:11:51.445 --> 0:11:53.565
<v Speaker 1>you were talking about, Adam, about why were we so

0:11:53.684 --> 0:11:57.645
<v Speaker 1>drawn to this character. A man says, he's just a kid,

0:11:57.804 --> 0:12:03.285
<v Speaker 1>just a kid. He's just a kid, and all of them,

0:12:03.325 --> 0:12:07.125
<v Speaker 1>my son and I think as kids too. Obviously a teenager,

0:12:07.165 --> 0:12:10.045
<v Speaker 1>but still like this was different than Superman, who was

0:12:10.085 --> 0:12:12.085
<v Speaker 1>not only an adult but like an alien. Right, this

0:12:12.205 --> 0:12:15.125
<v Speaker 1>is a kid. So in the scene he does revive

0:12:15.325 --> 0:12:17.285
<v Speaker 1>and then a couple of really little kids they hand

0:12:17.365 --> 0:12:19.245
<v Speaker 1>him his mask and you know, promise we won't tell

0:12:19.285 --> 0:12:23.765
<v Speaker 1>anybody here. There's that contract between Spider Man and the

0:12:23.845 --> 0:12:27.045
<v Speaker 1>people that he protects, and I think that's what this

0:12:27.085 --> 0:12:31.525
<v Speaker 1>whole sequence really speaks to the intimate relationship that this

0:12:31.605 --> 0:12:36.005
<v Speaker 1>particular superhero has to the people he's protecting. And I

0:12:36.045 --> 0:12:37.885
<v Speaker 1>do think this scene. I like how they set it

0:12:37.965 --> 0:12:41.485
<v Speaker 1>up where during that whole action portion, as Spider Man

0:12:41.564 --> 0:12:44.845
<v Speaker 1>is trying different things to get the train to stop,

0:12:44.965 --> 0:12:47.325
<v Speaker 1>some of the passengers kind of get snarky with him,

0:12:47.445 --> 0:12:50.205
<v Speaker 1>like what didn't work, and there's a back and forth.

0:12:50.245 --> 0:12:53.645
<v Speaker 1>So there's already been this connection established. These aren't just

0:12:53.645 --> 0:12:58.085
<v Speaker 1>faceless victims basically, and it made me wonder, I wonder

0:12:58.125 --> 0:13:01.325
<v Speaker 1>if if Spider Man is the superhero who people in

0:13:01.405 --> 0:13:05.405
<v Speaker 1>the story feel the closest to, almost on a personal level.

0:13:05.445 --> 0:13:07.605
<v Speaker 1>I mean, he is the friendly neighborhood Spider Man, right,

0:13:07.645 --> 0:13:12.444
<v Speaker 1>it's right there, And I do think there's something unique,

0:13:12.485 --> 0:13:15.565
<v Speaker 1>maybe there's someone I'm forgetting about that where these aren't.

0:13:15.684 --> 0:13:19.605
<v Speaker 1>You know, people talk about superheroes being the contemporary, modern

0:13:19.725 --> 0:13:23.365
<v Speaker 1>day mythical guy odds, and a lot of times that's

0:13:23.405 --> 0:13:27.085
<v Speaker 1>how we think of them, right, these superior beings, but

0:13:27.125 --> 0:13:29.564
<v Speaker 1>not in the case of Spider Man, and a key

0:13:29.605 --> 0:13:32.125
<v Speaker 1>portion of that is the relationship he has with the

0:13:32.125 --> 0:13:37.445
<v Speaker 1>people on the streets that he walks and serves. So yeah,

0:13:37.485 --> 0:13:39.525
<v Speaker 1>I think that's I think it's a great pick of Jonathan's.

0:13:39.564 --> 0:13:42.405
<v Speaker 1>Definitely one of my favorite scenes among all the movies.

0:13:42.485 --> 0:13:43.925
<v Speaker 1>So I'm gonna start there.

0:13:44.525 --> 0:13:47.085
<v Speaker 4>That would have been one of the top three or

0:13:47.085 --> 0:13:49.885
<v Speaker 4>four that immediately came to mind for me, and that

0:13:49.925 --> 0:13:52.005
<v Speaker 4>I would have I would have said, am I going

0:13:52.045 --> 0:13:54.684
<v Speaker 4>with this because it it in a way seemed obvious

0:13:54.684 --> 0:13:56.565
<v Speaker 4>to me, and I mean obvious just because it was

0:13:56.645 --> 0:13:58.805
<v Speaker 4>one of the first ones I thought of. Am I

0:13:59.005 --> 0:14:02.525
<v Speaker 4>Am I giving enough thought to this for me? Or

0:14:02.605 --> 0:14:06.525
<v Speaker 4>is this a greatest hit? And it has to be

0:14:06.645 --> 0:14:09.525
<v Speaker 4>considered Josh and I am giving it an honorable mention.

0:14:10.045 --> 0:14:12.765
<v Speaker 4>It is a moving scene. And you're right about the

0:14:12.804 --> 0:14:16.444
<v Speaker 4>intimate relationship between Spider Man and the city and its

0:14:16.485 --> 0:14:19.364
<v Speaker 4>citizens is such a crucial part of these films. Obviously,

0:14:19.485 --> 0:14:22.925
<v Speaker 4>the whole saga I don't know, and I'd love to

0:14:22.925 --> 0:14:26.365
<v Speaker 4>hear from some New Yorkers on this. I don't know

0:14:26.405 --> 0:14:30.605
<v Speaker 4>as I rewatch scenes whether or not the way New

0:14:30.685 --> 0:14:35.325
<v Speaker 4>Yorkers are depicted is one of the strengths of these films.

0:14:35.765 --> 0:14:40.205
<v Speaker 4>It definitely seems to for comedic reasons. It seems to

0:14:40.805 --> 0:14:43.365
<v Speaker 4>resort to the most obvious cliches.

0:14:44.085 --> 0:14:47.725
<v Speaker 1>My guess is people would say the Spider Verse movies

0:14:47.765 --> 0:14:50.765
<v Speaker 1>get this the closest, yes, is what I would think.

0:14:50.845 --> 0:14:56.285
<v Speaker 4>That's probably that's probably it's cartoonish. Otherwise, though, so that imagery,

0:14:56.565 --> 0:15:01.125
<v Speaker 4>which which seems almost like Christ's imagery obviously, with him

0:15:01.245 --> 0:15:04.885
<v Speaker 4>being held aloft with his with his arms out as

0:15:04.925 --> 0:15:08.565
<v Speaker 4>he's being taken back in is really a stunning image.

0:15:08.605 --> 0:15:11.165
<v Speaker 4>That line about him being just a kid is one

0:15:11.205 --> 0:15:14.165
<v Speaker 4>that sticks with you. And the last thing I'll say

0:15:14.285 --> 0:15:17.965
<v Speaker 4>is that even in the really bad Spider Man movies

0:15:18.445 --> 0:15:20.965
<v Speaker 4>and some of these films that we considered are bet

0:15:22.485 --> 0:15:26.045
<v Speaker 4>there are moments like that. Maybe not on that level,

0:15:26.245 --> 0:15:27.925
<v Speaker 4>that's why this one's on your list and why it's

0:15:27.925 --> 0:15:31.165
<v Speaker 4>an honorable mention for me. But but every every one

0:15:31.205 --> 0:15:34.885
<v Speaker 4>of these movies gives you at least one visual moment

0:15:35.045 --> 0:15:37.325
<v Speaker 4>like that, that that you can that you can take

0:15:37.365 --> 0:15:40.525
<v Speaker 4>away from it. And and that's maybe that's why something

0:15:40.565 --> 0:15:43.525
<v Speaker 4>about Spider Man and these films at least stays in

0:15:43.565 --> 0:15:46.205
<v Speaker 4>our imagination and why we want to do lists like

0:15:46.245 --> 0:15:52.645
<v Speaker 4>this one. My number five is one that involves dialogue

0:15:52.925 --> 0:15:57.445
<v Speaker 4>and no no great imagery, Josh, unless you consider a

0:15:57.485 --> 0:16:02.445
<v Speaker 4>couple of really effectively deployed close ups, and I suppose

0:16:02.725 --> 0:16:05.125
<v Speaker 4>I will. I'm gonna start with a Spider Man scene

0:16:05.125 --> 0:16:08.725
<v Speaker 4>that doesn't involve anyone in a Spider Man suit, nor

0:16:08.805 --> 0:16:12.445
<v Speaker 4>anyone in any kind of superhero or super villain suit

0:16:12.525 --> 0:16:16.365
<v Speaker 4>at all. There's certainly no cgi. There's no spectacle to

0:16:16.485 --> 0:16:21.685
<v Speaker 4>it whatsoever, unless you consider watching Michael Keaton perform on

0:16:21.805 --> 0:16:27.885
<v Speaker 4>screen a spectacle. When I think of these Tom holland

0:16:28.365 --> 0:16:32.005
<v Speaker 4>mcu Spider Man movies, the scene that I have to

0:16:32.045 --> 0:16:34.205
<v Speaker 4>admit is most memorable for me. It's not any of

0:16:34.285 --> 0:16:37.245
<v Speaker 4>these big show stopping action sequences, and it's still a

0:16:37.285 --> 0:16:42.485
<v Speaker 4>treat to watch. It's the dad talk between Keaton's Adrian

0:16:42.525 --> 0:16:47.885
<v Speaker 4>Tombs and Holland's Peter Parker when he's taken his daughter

0:16:48.205 --> 0:16:50.565
<v Speaker 4>out on a date and they're in the back seat

0:16:50.605 --> 0:16:56.005
<v Speaker 4>together as Keaton's Vulture is chauffeuring them around, and he

0:16:56.085 --> 0:16:59.445
<v Speaker 4>has put together what Peter has already put together, having

0:16:59.485 --> 0:17:02.125
<v Speaker 4>recognized him because he doesn't wear a mask, that he

0:17:02.325 --> 0:17:06.085
<v Speaker 4>is the villain, he's the bad guy. But here Adrian's

0:17:06.285 --> 0:17:10.125
<v Speaker 4>putting it together that through some of the conversation that

0:17:10.205 --> 0:17:13.885
<v Speaker 4>Peter Parker, his daughter's date, is in fact his nemesis.

0:17:13.925 --> 0:17:15.405
<v Speaker 4>Now Spider Man.

0:17:15.805 --> 0:17:21.485
<v Speaker 2>Does she though no what? So she does good close

0:17:21.525 --> 0:17:24.885
<v Speaker 2>to the verst. I'd admire that I've got a few

0:17:24.885 --> 0:17:28.685
<v Speaker 2>secrets to my own. All the reasons I didn't want

0:17:28.725 --> 0:17:29.965
<v Speaker 2>my daughter to date.

0:17:31.085 --> 0:17:33.125
<v Speaker 4>Comic book villains is why I also wanted to give

0:17:33.125 --> 0:17:34.685
<v Speaker 4>a little bit of love to this scene and not

0:17:34.765 --> 0:17:36.885
<v Speaker 4>just give it to Spider Man. As we're doing our

0:17:36.925 --> 0:17:41.165
<v Speaker 4>top five Spider Man moments, Comic book villains on screen

0:17:41.405 --> 0:17:43.685
<v Speaker 4>are just so hard to pull off. When you think

0:17:43.725 --> 0:17:49.445
<v Speaker 4>about the best super hero movies period, so often aren't

0:17:49.445 --> 0:17:52.365
<v Speaker 4>the ones that are near the top of the list,

0:17:52.925 --> 0:17:55.965
<v Speaker 4>They're the ones that have the most memorable villains. It's

0:17:56.005 --> 0:17:57.725
<v Speaker 4>like three right off the top of my head. The

0:17:57.805 --> 0:18:02.485
<v Speaker 4>Dark Knight with the Joker. Eric Killmonger is one of

0:18:02.485 --> 0:18:05.805
<v Speaker 4>the great villains in Black Panther. Spider Man two. You

0:18:05.925 --> 0:18:09.005
<v Speaker 4>just talked about it, and doc oc Al for Molina

0:18:09.205 --> 0:18:12.005
<v Speaker 4>is a key part of that. And you might be

0:18:12.085 --> 0:18:15.445
<v Speaker 4>listening and saying, well, yeah, duh. The villains, they're the antagonists.

0:18:15.445 --> 0:18:17.525
<v Speaker 4>They're a huge part of the movie. They're major characters.

0:18:17.525 --> 0:18:21.205
<v Speaker 4>They're driving the action. Of course, the villains are important.

0:18:21.285 --> 0:18:23.605
<v Speaker 4>That's my point, though it should be obvious, and yet

0:18:23.605 --> 0:18:28.525
<v Speaker 4>there are plenty of examples where they the filmmakers try

0:18:28.565 --> 0:18:32.725
<v Speaker 4>to provide some psychological motivation and mostly hope the cool

0:18:32.765 --> 0:18:35.845
<v Speaker 4>effects will wow the audience. They give him a cool

0:18:35.885 --> 0:18:38.805
<v Speaker 4>suit or whatever and some cool powers and that's about it.

0:18:39.245 --> 0:18:42.445
<v Speaker 4>And this will come up again when I do bring

0:18:42.525 --> 0:18:47.165
<v Speaker 4>up the amazing Spider Man two Electro anyone. You know,

0:18:47.205 --> 0:18:49.365
<v Speaker 4>I think Electro kind of fits this bill and is

0:18:49.485 --> 0:18:52.805
<v Speaker 4>one of the reasons why no offense to Jamie Fox,

0:18:52.845 --> 0:18:55.525
<v Speaker 4>who I think gives it his best, but he is

0:18:55.565 --> 0:19:01.005
<v Speaker 4>not a good villain. And you watch this scene between

0:19:01.285 --> 0:19:05.845
<v Speaker 4>Keaton and Holland, and Keaton is just delivering what I

0:19:05.885 --> 0:19:08.685
<v Speaker 4>said at the time, was a masterclass in menace. It's

0:19:08.765 --> 0:19:12.885
<v Speaker 4>so intense without ever raising his voice. He's so scary,

0:19:13.245 --> 0:19:16.045
<v Speaker 4>despite having a smile on his face for much of

0:19:16.045 --> 0:19:19.205
<v Speaker 4>the conversation. I mean, it's a twisted smile, but it's

0:19:19.205 --> 0:19:19.645
<v Speaker 4>a smile.

0:19:20.045 --> 0:19:24.525
<v Speaker 2>The nothing. It's more important than family. You saved my

0:19:24.645 --> 0:19:27.685
<v Speaker 2>daughter's life, and I could never forget something like that.

0:19:27.805 --> 0:19:30.565
<v Speaker 2>So I'm gonna give you one chance. Are you ready?

0:19:31.645 --> 0:19:34.565
<v Speaker 2>Who walks through those doors? You forget any of this happened,

0:19:35.165 --> 0:19:40.365
<v Speaker 2>And don't you ever ever interfere with my business again,

0:19:41.365 --> 0:19:47.165
<v Speaker 2>because if you do, I'll kill you and everybody you love.

0:19:48.845 --> 0:19:51.525
<v Speaker 2>I'll kill you dead. That's what I'll do to protect

0:19:51.565 --> 0:19:52.365
<v Speaker 2>my family. Pete.

0:19:52.805 --> 0:19:57.244
<v Speaker 4>You understand villains, if you really go back and think

0:19:57.285 --> 0:20:00.765
<v Speaker 4>about him, they almost always have a grudge, of course,

0:20:01.245 --> 0:20:04.005
<v Speaker 4>against someone, and it's usually Spider Man or whoever they're

0:20:04.005 --> 0:20:08.165
<v Speaker 4>fighting or against the world, and they believe they're justified

0:20:08.165 --> 0:20:12.045
<v Speaker 4>in their actions. Why else are they doing whatever? Why

0:20:12.085 --> 0:20:15.285
<v Speaker 4>else are they doing it? Unless maybe I can't believe

0:20:15.325 --> 0:20:18.445
<v Speaker 4>I'm mentioning it again, unless maybe they're the Rhino Paul

0:20:18.485 --> 0:20:21.405
<v Speaker 4>Giamatti's character and the amazing Spider Man too. He just

0:20:21.445 --> 0:20:24.725
<v Speaker 4>seems to want to Reacavoc for no good reason. But

0:20:24.805 --> 0:20:29.765
<v Speaker 4>with the Vulture, it's very clear the Keaton tapped into

0:20:29.805 --> 0:20:32.365
<v Speaker 4>a character who just wants to take care of his

0:20:32.405 --> 0:20:36.205
<v Speaker 4>family and believes that his business has been screwed over

0:20:36.565 --> 0:20:39.525
<v Speaker 4>by the government. And when you watch the movie, it's

0:20:39.525 --> 0:20:43.045
<v Speaker 4>hard to argue with him. You absolutely understand the predicament

0:20:43.245 --> 0:20:48.405
<v Speaker 4>that he's in and you sympathize with him. He certainly

0:20:48.445 --> 0:20:50.685
<v Speaker 4>feels like, even though it's just these two guys sitting

0:20:50.685 --> 0:20:52.965
<v Speaker 4>in a car, he feels like a real threat to

0:20:53.005 --> 0:20:57.605
<v Speaker 4>Spider Man here. As a villains, he's of course a

0:20:57.645 --> 0:21:01.445
<v Speaker 4>threat despite just being a man. That's it. He's not

0:21:01.565 --> 0:21:04.965
<v Speaker 4>imbued with any special powers. He is just a man.

0:21:05.965 --> 0:21:07.885
<v Speaker 4>All of these other villains are almost all the other

0:21:07.925 --> 0:21:10.685
<v Speaker 4>villains you can think of, have been transformed in some

0:21:10.805 --> 0:21:15.165
<v Speaker 4>way and are not really human or fully human anymore.

0:21:16.205 --> 0:21:21.685
<v Speaker 4>Vulture stands out because of his humanity and you you

0:21:21.725 --> 0:21:26.405
<v Speaker 4>see it come through in his overprotectiveness of his family

0:21:27.045 --> 0:21:29.325
<v Speaker 4>in this scene. Like I said, it was one of

0:21:29.365 --> 0:21:31.245
<v Speaker 4>the first few scenes that came to mind for me,

0:21:31.405 --> 0:21:33.325
<v Speaker 4>maybe because it's one of the most recent, but of

0:21:33.365 --> 0:21:37.685
<v Speaker 4>all the MCU incarnations, this one had to be on

0:21:37.725 --> 0:21:38.485
<v Speaker 4>my list.

0:21:38.645 --> 0:21:41.765
<v Speaker 1>Yeah. It came to mind to me immediately as well, unfairly,

0:21:41.845 --> 0:21:45.405
<v Speaker 1>probably because I walked into the family room maybe two

0:21:45.525 --> 0:21:47.885
<v Speaker 1>or three weeks ago, and this was playing on the TV.

0:21:48.005 --> 0:21:50.925
<v Speaker 1>This is what my kids were watching, and I just

0:21:50.965 --> 0:21:53.125
<v Speaker 1>had to stop. I had to sit down. I had

0:21:53.165 --> 0:21:54.565
<v Speaker 1>to finish it, because.

0:21:54.245 --> 0:21:56.405
<v Speaker 4>It's really a great scene.

0:21:56.605 --> 0:21:58.244
<v Speaker 1>As a matter of fact, I've got it higher on

0:21:58.245 --> 0:22:00.285
<v Speaker 1>my list. So I'm gonna do some jumping around here

0:22:01.085 --> 0:22:05.405
<v Speaker 1>and I'll get back to my number four, and right

0:22:05.445 --> 0:22:07.405
<v Speaker 1>now talk about my number three, which is where I

0:22:07.485 --> 0:22:11.405
<v Speaker 1>have the dad talk. It is. If we have to

0:22:11.645 --> 0:22:14.405
<v Speaker 1>give a majority of the credit, it is Keaton. You're right,

0:22:14.845 --> 0:22:17.245
<v Speaker 1>this is a character, as you laid out well, so

0:22:18.685 --> 0:22:24.005
<v Speaker 1>smartly conceived and motivated, believably so. And then what Keaton

0:22:24.085 --> 0:22:27.325
<v Speaker 1>does with it, I mean, those who need cgi When

0:22:27.365 --> 0:22:32.485
<v Speaker 1>you have Michael Keaton's eyebrows, you're you're good. That's definitely

0:22:32.605 --> 0:22:36.565
<v Speaker 1>a huge part of the tension in this scene. I

0:22:36.605 --> 0:22:39.565
<v Speaker 1>do think Holland is also quite good here though, even

0:22:39.605 --> 0:22:42.125
<v Speaker 1>though it's not his moment. This is Keaton's moment. But

0:22:43.205 --> 0:22:46.525
<v Speaker 1>I like how he plays Peter trying to be cool,

0:22:47.485 --> 0:22:52.485
<v Speaker 1>but clearly not only intimidated but scared yes on a

0:22:52.565 --> 0:22:59.085
<v Speaker 1>multiple multiple reasons because of his relationship with Vulture's daughter. Right,

0:22:59.165 --> 0:23:04.325
<v Speaker 1>Laura Harrier is the actress here, and she's at the

0:23:04.325 --> 0:23:06.805
<v Speaker 1>beginning of the scene, and I love the dynamic there.

0:23:06.805 --> 0:23:09.965
<v Speaker 1>She's like, Okay, I'm gonna go go in and leave

0:23:10.005 --> 0:23:12.405
<v Speaker 1>you two alone to have your talk. And this is

0:23:12.485 --> 0:23:14.125
<v Speaker 1>I think this is what's so great about this scene

0:23:14.125 --> 0:23:17.685
<v Speaker 1>as well. Is the genius, the simple genius of the

0:23:18.205 --> 0:23:20.925
<v Speaker 1>of Spider Man Homecoming, let's say, to a lesser degree,

0:23:21.085 --> 0:23:23.365
<v Speaker 1>far from home. And I think this gets lost a

0:23:23.405 --> 0:23:25.965
<v Speaker 1>bit in No Way Home, but in Spider Man Homecoming

0:23:26.085 --> 0:23:28.885
<v Speaker 1>is that it was a high school movie first and

0:23:28.965 --> 0:23:33.925
<v Speaker 1>a Spider Man movie second, and so your emotional investment

0:23:34.405 --> 0:23:38.245
<v Speaker 1>is equally at least, let's say, in that scene, in

0:23:38.285 --> 0:23:43.645
<v Speaker 1>this familiar, uncomfortable dynamic of being, you know, a teen

0:23:43.725 --> 0:23:47.165
<v Speaker 1>couple in a car with one of your parents, and

0:23:47.325 --> 0:23:50.165
<v Speaker 1>what you're going to talk about, how your parent is

0:23:50.205 --> 0:23:52.405
<v Speaker 1>going to act, how your boyfriend or girlfriend is going

0:23:52.485 --> 0:23:56.045
<v Speaker 1>to act, however that goes Already, you've got natural anxiety,

0:23:56.365 --> 0:23:58.925
<v Speaker 1>and then the context that this story brings into it

0:23:59.005 --> 0:24:01.245
<v Speaker 1>just amps that up. And I think that's the line

0:24:01.245 --> 0:24:03.685
<v Speaker 1>that Holland plays really well in the movie overall, but

0:24:03.765 --> 0:24:08.445
<v Speaker 1>here in particular, he's anxious as the boyfriend and he's

0:24:08.485 --> 0:24:14.205
<v Speaker 1>anxious as the hero facing his nemesis here, So it

0:24:14.245 --> 0:24:16.085
<v Speaker 1>goes back to that, you know, he's just a kid

0:24:16.125 --> 0:24:20.125
<v Speaker 1>thing we already touched on, right, that's definitely at play here.

0:24:20.245 --> 0:24:23.045
<v Speaker 1>I think the best about these Holland movies are the

0:24:23.045 --> 0:24:28.445
<v Speaker 1>way they kind of capture the acute anxiety of that. So, yeah,

0:24:28.445 --> 0:24:30.765
<v Speaker 1>totally with you there. My number three pick is the

0:24:30.885 --> 0:24:31.485
<v Speaker 1>dad talk.

0:24:31.845 --> 0:24:35.085
<v Speaker 2>Now you're going in there, you show my daughter a

0:24:35.085 --> 0:24:38.845
<v Speaker 2>good time, Okay, just not too good.

0:24:39.925 --> 0:24:43.285
<v Speaker 4>Part of the fun of that scene as a viewer

0:24:43.885 --> 0:24:47.965
<v Speaker 4>is the way it plays with our expectations and our

0:24:48.085 --> 0:24:55.525
<v Speaker 4>understanding of these familiar scenes. And that's a familiar cultural scene,

0:24:56.165 --> 0:24:58.965
<v Speaker 4>whether we've been involved in it ourselves or not. We

0:24:59.085 --> 0:25:03.365
<v Speaker 4>understand the dad talk, as the dad in that scene

0:25:03.405 --> 0:25:05.285
<v Speaker 4>even refers to it, I'm going to have the dad talk,

0:25:05.325 --> 0:25:07.405
<v Speaker 4>and the daughter knows what that means as she gets

0:25:07.445 --> 0:25:12.965
<v Speaker 4>out of the car, and it doesn't go the way

0:25:13.605 --> 0:25:17.805
<v Speaker 4>it should go at all, So it subverts that. But

0:25:17.885 --> 0:25:27.605
<v Speaker 4>then also it subverts the superhero villain hero conversation confrontation

0:25:27.725 --> 0:25:30.685
<v Speaker 4>scene because There are plenty of examples in those movies

0:25:31.005 --> 0:25:34.285
<v Speaker 4>where and in Spider Man movies where one of the

0:25:34.365 --> 0:25:37.005
<v Speaker 4>two in the scene is kind of on to the

0:25:37.045 --> 0:25:40.365
<v Speaker 4>other and their real identity, and so they have that

0:25:40.565 --> 0:25:43.445
<v Speaker 4>teasing conversation where they're kind of trying to suss it

0:25:43.525 --> 0:25:46.725
<v Speaker 4>out or they're prodding the other one a little bit,

0:25:46.765 --> 0:25:49.725
<v Speaker 4>but it doesn't really go anywhere. They don't actually they

0:25:49.725 --> 0:25:53.605
<v Speaker 4>don't say it. They don't bluntly say what they're really

0:25:53.645 --> 0:25:57.045
<v Speaker 4>thinking and feeling, and they don't actually call the other

0:25:57.125 --> 0:26:00.565
<v Speaker 4>person out on it. And in this scene, they just

0:26:01.165 --> 0:26:04.965
<v Speaker 4>he just puts the pleasantries completely aside and does that.

0:26:05.005 --> 0:26:07.405
<v Speaker 4>So I think it it just confounds our expectations in

0:26:07.445 --> 0:26:11.165
<v Speaker 4>that way and a really in a really great way.

0:26:12.205 --> 0:26:14.565
<v Speaker 4>You may have already seen it, Josh, but I need

0:26:14.605 --> 0:26:17.445
<v Speaker 4>to go see Spider Man Brand New day in order

0:26:17.485 --> 0:26:20.205
<v Speaker 4>to review it here next week on the show. That's

0:26:20.245 --> 0:26:23.725
<v Speaker 4>one I am excited to see in the theater. Have

0:26:24.245 --> 0:26:26.565
<v Speaker 4>a couple of kids in my house actually who are

0:26:26.765 --> 0:26:29.205
<v Speaker 4>excited to see the new Spider Man movie as well,

0:26:29.405 --> 0:26:33.085
<v Speaker 4>so I'll have company for that one. It will be

0:26:33.085 --> 0:26:35.285
<v Speaker 4>fun to watch that now through the lens of having

0:26:35.365 --> 0:26:38.885
<v Speaker 4>revisited all of these films and thinking about some things

0:26:38.925 --> 0:26:39.565
<v Speaker 4>in common.

0:26:40.085 --> 0:26:43.445
<v Speaker 1>There are definitely some callbacks to a few of the

0:26:43.485 --> 0:26:45.805
<v Speaker 1>moments we talked about.

0:26:45.925 --> 0:26:48.805
<v Speaker 4>The Invite is the big movie I still haven't caught

0:26:48.845 --> 0:26:51.485
<v Speaker 4>in the theater, and you can still see that at

0:26:51.525 --> 0:26:54.005
<v Speaker 4>Regal Cinemas. And here's one more I'm gonna call out

0:26:54.205 --> 0:26:56.725
<v Speaker 4>because we were just in Spring Green and we were

0:26:56.725 --> 0:26:59.605
<v Speaker 4>hanging out seeing some theater with our producer, Sam, and

0:26:59.645 --> 0:27:02.525
<v Speaker 4>he talked about a musical that I've never seen any

0:27:02.565 --> 0:27:07.325
<v Speaker 4>kind of production of. It's playing on the big screen,

0:27:07.845 --> 0:27:14.165
<v Speaker 4>hades Town the musical. Sam swears by how good this

0:27:14.285 --> 0:27:18.885
<v Speaker 4>musical is. And this stars the original Broadway cast Hadestown

0:27:18.925 --> 0:27:22.365
<v Speaker 4>the Musical available now on the big screen, and you

0:27:22.405 --> 0:27:26.085
<v Speaker 4>can see that for free with Regal Unlimited, the all

0:27:26.125 --> 0:27:28.645
<v Speaker 4>you can watch movie subscription pass that pays for itself

0:27:28.685 --> 0:27:31.725
<v Speaker 4>in just two visits. If you sign up for Regal Unlimited,

0:27:32.045 --> 0:27:34.605
<v Speaker 4>just use the code film Spot twenty six to get

0:27:34.645 --> 0:27:39.445
<v Speaker 4>fifteen percent off. Regal Unlimited is the only truly limitless

0:27:39.445 --> 0:27:42.565
<v Speaker 4>movie subscription pass. You can see any standard two D

0:27:42.685 --> 0:27:45.725
<v Speaker 4>movie anytime with no blockout dates or restrictions, and you

0:27:45.765 --> 0:27:48.885
<v Speaker 4>don't just save money on tickets. You also save on snacks.

0:27:49.245 --> 0:27:53.365
<v Speaker 4>You get ten percent off all non alcoholic concessions. Again,

0:27:53.525 --> 0:27:55.645
<v Speaker 4>just sign up now in the regal app or at

0:27:55.725 --> 0:27:59.125
<v Speaker 4>the link in our podcast notes and use code film

0:27:59.125 --> 0:28:08.605
<v Speaker 4>Spot twenty six to get your discount. So we've got

0:28:08.605 --> 0:28:12.325
<v Speaker 4>your number five, we've got my number five, and we've

0:28:12.325 --> 0:28:14.485
<v Speaker 4>got your number three. That means then we do have

0:28:14.525 --> 0:28:17.045
<v Speaker 4>to go back to my number four, and we're going

0:28:17.125 --> 0:28:22.485
<v Speaker 4>to stick with recent vintage Spider Man. And this is

0:28:22.525 --> 0:28:26.845
<v Speaker 4>from Spider Man into the Spider Verse, and the sequence

0:28:27.085 --> 0:28:32.325
<v Speaker 4>is my name is Peter B. Parker Jake Johnson when

0:28:32.885 --> 0:28:37.885
<v Speaker 4>we learn about the backstory of his character, and I

0:28:37.925 --> 0:28:41.165
<v Speaker 4>guess this is this is what I'm looking for or

0:28:41.205 --> 0:28:44.125
<v Speaker 4>something that I need from these scenes in order to

0:28:44.125 --> 0:28:49.405
<v Speaker 4>make my list. Anyway, Josh, that subversion of expectations. We're

0:28:49.445 --> 0:28:52.365
<v Speaker 4>not used to seeing Spider Man with the five o'clock

0:28:52.445 --> 0:28:56.205
<v Speaker 4>shadow or with the B in his name, so something's

0:28:56.205 --> 0:28:59.565
<v Speaker 4>a little bit off. Our spider sense is tingling a little.

0:28:59.725 --> 0:29:03.445
<v Speaker 4>But he more or less looks like the Spider Man

0:29:03.525 --> 0:29:08.645
<v Speaker 4>we know from the movies. Everything's checking out. He even says,

0:29:09.165 --> 0:29:12.925
<v Speaker 4>let's do this one last time, suggesting that he's gonna

0:29:12.925 --> 0:29:15.245
<v Speaker 4>give us the familiar yarn. Let's just bring you up

0:29:15.285 --> 0:29:18.205
<v Speaker 4>to speed. But it's everything you already know. And as

0:29:18.205 --> 0:29:21.925
<v Speaker 4>he's saying it, the story in the imagery lines up,

0:29:22.045 --> 0:29:24.805
<v Speaker 4>including a scene we may hear about later, right the

0:29:24.885 --> 0:29:29.085
<v Speaker 4>upside down kiss, the famous upside down kiss with MJ

0:29:30.205 --> 0:29:35.245
<v Speaker 4>and his dialogue. The narration includes, you see, I saved

0:29:35.245 --> 0:29:38.605
<v Speaker 4>the city, fell in love. Okay, I got married. Well

0:29:38.645 --> 0:29:41.165
<v Speaker 4>that's that's maybe a new wrinkle. But I can buy

0:29:41.205 --> 0:29:45.045
<v Speaker 4>that saved the city some more, maybe too much. I'm

0:29:45.085 --> 0:29:48.645
<v Speaker 4>still I'm still buying this. I'm thinking, congratulations, Spidey. I'm glad.

0:29:48.725 --> 0:29:51.885
<v Speaker 4>I'm glad things worked out. You fell in love, and then.

0:29:52.085 --> 0:29:54.365
<v Speaker 3>I'm pretty sure you know the rest. You see, I

0:29:54.405 --> 0:29:57.125
<v Speaker 3>saved the city, fell in love, I got married, saved

0:29:57.125 --> 0:30:00.085
<v Speaker 3>the city some more, maybe too much. My marriage got testy,

0:30:00.365 --> 0:30:03.245
<v Speaker 3>made some dicey money choices. Don't invest in a spider

0:30:03.285 --> 0:30:06.605
<v Speaker 3>themed restaurant. Then, like fifteen years past, bob blah blah,

0:30:06.645 --> 0:30:09.005
<v Speaker 3>super barn. I broke my back, A drunk flew into

0:30:09.045 --> 0:30:12.045
<v Speaker 3>my face. I buried at May. My wife and I

0:30:12.125 --> 0:30:14.765
<v Speaker 3>split up, but I handled it like a chap.

0:30:16.365 --> 0:30:19.525
<v Speaker 4>It's the it's the part about the marriage getting testy

0:30:20.085 --> 0:30:23.965
<v Speaker 4>and making some see money choices and him warning us

0:30:24.045 --> 0:30:28.485
<v Speaker 4>Josh to not invest in any Spider themed restaurants. Did

0:30:28.525 --> 0:30:31.525
<v Speaker 4>you know, Josh, that seahorses mate for life. I can't

0:30:31.565 --> 0:30:34.445
<v Speaker 4>imagine a seahorse seeing another seahorse and making it work.

0:30:35.165 --> 0:30:41.285
<v Speaker 4>This this is funny stuff, genuinely funny stuff. And even

0:30:41.365 --> 0:30:46.845
<v Speaker 4>though those movies, these superhero movies, are largely about the

0:30:46.885 --> 0:30:51.845
<v Speaker 4>conflict between between two identities, trying to reconcile being a

0:30:51.885 --> 0:30:55.725
<v Speaker 4>hero versus just being a man, I don't think any

0:30:55.765 --> 0:30:59.965
<v Speaker 4>of us actually do really consider the possibility that any

0:31:00.005 --> 0:31:02.365
<v Speaker 4>of these, any of these heroes are ever going to

0:31:02.405 --> 0:31:06.405
<v Speaker 4>be washed up. And so this movie makes us think

0:31:06.445 --> 0:31:12.645
<v Speaker 4>about that, and the ironic jextapositions of the visuals and

0:31:12.765 --> 0:31:16.485
<v Speaker 4>Peter's narration. I remember seeing as in the theater and

0:31:16.605 --> 0:31:19.445
<v Speaker 4>lack good out loud at it, but I handled it

0:31:19.525 --> 0:31:22.245
<v Speaker 4>like a champ. And he's sobbing in the shower, And

0:31:22.605 --> 0:31:24.445
<v Speaker 4>no matter how many times I get hit, I always

0:31:24.485 --> 0:31:27.165
<v Speaker 4>get back up, and he's just, you know, crouched in bed,

0:31:27.685 --> 0:31:34.325
<v Speaker 4>completely despondent. The way too that Jake Johnson lowers his

0:31:34.445 --> 0:31:37.525
<v Speaker 4>voice at the beginning. He's talking in that normal kind

0:31:37.525 --> 0:31:39.885
<v Speaker 4>of Jake Johnson way. But then when he says the

0:31:39.925 --> 0:31:41.725
<v Speaker 4>one and Only Spider.

0:31:41.365 --> 0:31:44.485
<v Speaker 3>Man, the one and only Spider.

0:31:44.085 --> 0:31:47.645
<v Speaker 4>Man, as if he knows as the character, he has

0:31:47.725 --> 0:31:51.605
<v Speaker 4>to say it with some authority, but he also he

0:31:51.645 --> 0:31:54.765
<v Speaker 4>also means it. It's not just out of some sense

0:31:54.765 --> 0:31:59.485
<v Speaker 4>of duty, it's not performative. He wants to put that

0:31:59.605 --> 0:32:03.605
<v Speaker 4>authority behind it. I think that's why Johnson is so

0:32:03.725 --> 0:32:05.885
<v Speaker 4>perfect in that role as Peter B. Parker, is that

0:32:05.925 --> 0:32:09.645
<v Speaker 4>he is inherently an ironic actor. There's always an element

0:32:09.805 --> 0:32:13.885
<v Speaker 4>of winking at the audience, but he does not overplay

0:32:13.925 --> 0:32:17.965
<v Speaker 4>it at all. There is something still deeply genuine that

0:32:18.045 --> 0:32:21.125
<v Speaker 4>he brings to certainly this character. And I think a

0:32:21.205 --> 0:32:25.805
<v Speaker 4>scene for me maybe a microcosm of Spider Verse, where

0:32:25.845 --> 0:32:31.085
<v Speaker 4>I remember not only finding it legitimately hilarious, but also

0:32:31.285 --> 0:32:35.805
<v Speaker 4>I was shaking my head at how the filmmakers took something,

0:32:36.205 --> 0:32:40.325
<v Speaker 4>took a narrative and took imagery that was so familiar

0:32:40.765 --> 0:32:42.285
<v Speaker 4>and made it feel brand new.

0:32:42.565 --> 0:32:46.605
<v Speaker 1>Yeah. That quality of Jake Johnson's performance I think works

0:32:46.685 --> 0:32:49.125
<v Speaker 1>really well with the progression you get in this scene

0:32:49.165 --> 0:32:51.725
<v Speaker 1>because it does start out, as you were saying, with

0:32:51.765 --> 0:32:54.405
<v Speaker 1>the familiar things and showing us what we knew or

0:32:54.405 --> 0:32:58.045
<v Speaker 1>we've heard in other iterations. And then there's the slight diversion.

0:32:58.085 --> 0:33:01.285
<v Speaker 1>He starts to use euphemisms right like the money thing.

0:33:01.325 --> 0:33:04.085
<v Speaker 1>He doesn't exactly say what happened. It's way worse than

0:33:04.125 --> 0:33:07.365
<v Speaker 1>the phrase uses. And then, as you said, by the

0:33:07.405 --> 0:33:10.325
<v Speaker 1>time the scene comes to its end, what he's saying

0:33:10.405 --> 0:33:13.125
<v Speaker 1>is exactly the opposite of all we're seeing. So that

0:33:13.245 --> 0:33:16.725
<v Speaker 1>vocal quality works well with this progression towards complete denial

0:33:16.845 --> 0:33:20.485
<v Speaker 1>that the visuals that the visuals are giving us. Yes,

0:33:20.565 --> 0:33:24.005
<v Speaker 1>so smart, such a smart movie, able to be funny

0:33:24.005 --> 0:33:27.525
<v Speaker 1>and thrilling in so many ways. And you know, even

0:33:27.565 --> 0:33:31.805
<v Speaker 1>this character I think works well because he is a

0:33:31.845 --> 0:33:35.325
<v Speaker 1>supporting character to this larger story we're telling, and so

0:33:35.365 --> 0:33:38.805
<v Speaker 1>we can get these qualities before they become rote or

0:33:38.845 --> 0:33:42.045
<v Speaker 1>too familiar or too much of a joke. Instead, they're

0:33:42.085 --> 0:33:46.365
<v Speaker 1>informing the larger narrative in crucial ways but also really

0:33:46.485 --> 0:33:50.525
<v Speaker 1>entertaining ones like this scene. All right, so I need

0:33:50.565 --> 0:33:54.205
<v Speaker 1>to jump back to my number four to get us

0:33:54.245 --> 0:33:58.365
<v Speaker 1>back on track here, and I have a bit of

0:33:58.365 --> 0:34:02.245
<v Speaker 1>a cheat here. I did this with Superman two. This

0:34:02.605 --> 0:34:05.325
<v Speaker 1>is going to be a title sequence in theme song.

0:34:05.445 --> 0:34:09.125
<v Speaker 1>I am choosing that from the Spider Man animated series

0:34:09.165 --> 0:34:13.805
<v Speaker 1>that ran from nineteen sixty seven to nineteen seventy. With

0:34:13.965 --> 0:34:16.285
<v Speaker 1>the Superman list we did, I chose the opening for

0:34:16.325 --> 0:34:20.165
<v Speaker 1>those Fleischer Studios shorts from nineteen forty one. A listener

0:34:21.205 --> 0:34:23.045
<v Speaker 1>me in on those, and I ended up watching I

0:34:23.045 --> 0:34:25.884
<v Speaker 1>don't know how many, because they were just fascinating and

0:34:25.925 --> 0:34:29.405
<v Speaker 1>had that great opening sequence. And part of my reasoning

0:34:29.445 --> 0:34:32.325
<v Speaker 1>for picking it there is because that sequence from nineteen

0:34:32.365 --> 0:34:36.245
<v Speaker 1>forty one cemented crucial qualities of the Superman character in

0:34:36.285 --> 0:34:39.364
<v Speaker 1>our collective imagination. And I think this one, even though

0:34:39.365 --> 0:34:43.404
<v Speaker 1>it's borrowing quite heavily from the comic books, this did

0:34:43.485 --> 0:34:47.325
<v Speaker 1>so in the late sixties and onward. I mean we

0:34:47.325 --> 0:34:50.285
<v Speaker 1>were watching this adam not during its initial run. We

0:34:50.325 --> 0:34:54.364
<v Speaker 1>would have been watching this maybe ten years after on reruns, right,

0:34:54.765 --> 0:34:58.245
<v Speaker 1>but it had been I'm sure playing the whole time

0:34:58.365 --> 0:35:02.645
<v Speaker 1>for multiple generations of kids. So if you look at

0:35:02.645 --> 0:35:04.364
<v Speaker 1>the Spider Man, if you look at Spider Man as

0:35:04.365 --> 0:35:07.364
<v Speaker 1>a character basically debuting in a Marvel comic in sixty two,

0:35:07.805 --> 0:35:10.925
<v Speaker 1>got his first solo series in sixty three, and obviously

0:35:10.925 --> 0:35:14.725
<v Speaker 1>that's set the foundation for the character. But for me,

0:35:14.925 --> 0:35:18.205
<v Speaker 1>born in seventy four. I think this was my first

0:35:19.005 --> 0:35:22.245
<v Speaker 1>encounter with Spider Man. That would be my my guests.

0:35:22.325 --> 0:35:25.725
<v Speaker 1>I didn't really read comic books for whatever reason, until

0:35:25.805 --> 0:35:29.404
<v Speaker 1>I was an adult, actually, and so this Spider Man

0:35:29.445 --> 0:35:33.725
<v Speaker 1>cartoon was my first encounter, and I was locked in

0:35:34.765 --> 0:35:38.045
<v Speaker 1>That opening has everything I wanted and had. The swinging

0:35:38.245 --> 0:35:43.485
<v Speaker 1>you talked about, the web slinging, radioactive blood. Sure, I

0:35:43.485 --> 0:35:46.485
<v Speaker 1>probably had no idea what that meant, but sure sounds great.

0:35:47.205 --> 0:35:51.685
<v Speaker 1>And yeah, lots and lots and lots of climbing. And

0:35:51.725 --> 0:35:55.445
<v Speaker 1>I think this also captures equality that is a crucial

0:35:55.445 --> 0:35:58.565
<v Speaker 1>one for Spider Man, beyond his youth. But maybe related

0:35:59.605 --> 0:36:04.325
<v Speaker 1>that's emphasized here. He was friendly. He was a friendly

0:36:04.645 --> 0:36:08.165
<v Speaker 1>Spider Man. The lyrics are telling us this, but the

0:36:08.325 --> 0:36:11.925
<v Speaker 1>image I'll never forget. It's this great little bit, kind

0:36:11.925 --> 0:36:14.965
<v Speaker 1>of a winking bit in this opening credit sequence where

0:36:15.005 --> 0:36:17.325
<v Speaker 1>he's swinging through the air and we get a close

0:36:17.405 --> 0:36:19.605
<v Speaker 1>up and he just waves to the you know, quote

0:36:19.645 --> 0:36:23.404
<v Speaker 1>unquote camera waving, we've met me, you know, like six

0:36:23.565 --> 0:36:27.404
<v Speaker 1>or seven year old me. However old I was. There

0:36:27.485 --> 0:36:30.404
<v Speaker 1>was this superhero who paused in his heroics to give

0:36:30.445 --> 0:36:37.325
<v Speaker 1>me a little ways Snyder Man Steiner, So it's a

0:36:37.365 --> 0:36:40.525
<v Speaker 1>delightful piece of Spider Man iconography. It still resonates today.

0:36:40.685 --> 0:36:43.205
<v Speaker 1>This is where the Spider Man pointing at himself meme

0:36:43.285 --> 0:36:45.605
<v Speaker 1>comes from. So I did have to have it on

0:36:45.725 --> 0:36:47.685
<v Speaker 1>my list, even though it's from a TV series.

0:36:48.205 --> 0:36:51.245
<v Speaker 4>Yeah, watching that clip just a little bit earlier today

0:36:51.325 --> 0:36:55.605
<v Speaker 4>definitely took me back. Talk about a way nostalgia. It

0:36:55.725 --> 0:36:59.605
<v Speaker 4>did bring me back to my childhood. My number three

0:37:00.645 --> 0:37:03.565
<v Speaker 4>is from Spider Man two, Sam Raimi spider Man two,

0:37:03.965 --> 0:37:08.445
<v Speaker 4>and it's the Planetarium Party. I have to give credit

0:37:09.085 --> 0:37:12.205
<v Speaker 4>to the host of Film Spotting SVU, one of the

0:37:12.405 --> 0:37:16.005
<v Speaker 4>hosts of Film Spotting SVU, Matt Singer for reminding me

0:37:16.725 --> 0:37:20.005
<v Speaker 4>of this scene and the way I was reminded of

0:37:20.125 --> 0:37:25.885
<v Speaker 4>this scene Josh Is via our upcoming episode of movie Deathmatch.

0:37:26.285 --> 0:37:29.565
<v Speaker 4>This will drop in listener's feed if you follow film Spotting,

0:37:29.605 --> 0:37:32.484
<v Speaker 4>it will drop in your feed. On Monday, August third,

0:37:33.005 --> 0:37:35.525
<v Speaker 4>with Brand New Day coming out, we did a death

0:37:35.605 --> 0:37:38.845
<v Speaker 4>match between what a lot of people contend are the

0:37:38.925 --> 0:37:43.325
<v Speaker 4>two best Spider Man movies, Old School Spider Man two

0:37:43.965 --> 0:37:48.605
<v Speaker 4>and New School Into the Spider Verse. Matt advocating for

0:37:48.765 --> 0:37:53.924
<v Speaker 4>Spider Man two. Daisy Rosario defending into the Spider Verse.

0:37:54.085 --> 0:37:56.484
<v Speaker 4>Had a really great conversation about it. Again, that show

0:37:56.685 --> 0:37:59.965
<v Speaker 4>will be coming into your feed soon. Matt mentions a

0:38:00.005 --> 0:38:02.845
<v Speaker 4>scene from Spider Man two, and when I was scanning

0:38:02.925 --> 0:38:04.885
<v Speaker 4>through the movie and I went back and broke this

0:38:05.005 --> 0:38:08.765
<v Speaker 4>scene down, I knew it had to be on my list.

0:38:08.845 --> 0:38:10.365
<v Speaker 4>And the reason why Matt brought it up in the

0:38:10.405 --> 0:38:14.365
<v Speaker 4>context of Deathmatch is he was mentioning how during this

0:38:14.525 --> 0:38:21.645
<v Speaker 4>scene you really recognize Sam Raimi's sadistic tendencies as a director,

0:38:21.725 --> 0:38:24.805
<v Speaker 4>how they really come out. And we'll get into that,

0:38:25.245 --> 0:38:28.565
<v Speaker 4>because this is the scene that's this big high society

0:38:28.685 --> 0:38:31.885
<v Speaker 4>gala and Peter has been hired by j Jonah Jamison

0:38:32.325 --> 0:38:35.525
<v Speaker 4>to be the photographer for the event. There is a

0:38:35.685 --> 0:38:42.725
<v Speaker 4>lot of story unfolding here. Harry Osborne and Peter are

0:38:42.885 --> 0:38:46.885
<v Speaker 4>fighting about Spider Man. Peter is watching MJ. He doesn't

0:38:46.925 --> 0:38:49.125
<v Speaker 4>know it when he gets there, but Peter is watching

0:38:49.285 --> 0:38:54.725
<v Speaker 4>MJ get engaged to another man, John Jamison, and it

0:38:54.885 --> 0:38:59.005
<v Speaker 4>all could have just unfolded, rendering all of that drama

0:38:59.605 --> 0:39:03.485
<v Speaker 4>with a very dramatic expression, like I honestly could have

0:39:03.565 --> 0:39:06.805
<v Speaker 4>picked this scene Josh forgetting all the sadistic stuff and

0:39:07.125 --> 0:39:09.725
<v Speaker 4>just focusing on this moment. It could be a top

0:39:09.805 --> 0:39:13.725
<v Speaker 4>five contender just for the moment, the dramatic expression of

0:39:13.885 --> 0:39:18.285
<v Speaker 4>Peter's torment when he has to watch MJ descend the

0:39:18.365 --> 0:39:23.125
<v Speaker 4>staircase with John hearing about this perfect man, and then

0:39:23.245 --> 0:39:27.485
<v Speaker 4>seeing her so happy, well seemingly happy as she comes

0:39:27.525 --> 0:39:30.844
<v Speaker 4>down the stairs, and the way camera and editing work

0:39:30.925 --> 0:39:36.365
<v Speaker 4>together kind of swirling around him to show how devastated

0:39:37.045 --> 0:39:42.165
<v Speaker 4>he is. It's very, very effective. But where this scene

0:39:42.325 --> 0:39:45.605
<v Speaker 4>really becomes special for me is that it could have

0:39:45.725 --> 0:39:47.364
<v Speaker 4>just been all that. It could have been just about

0:39:47.365 --> 0:39:51.605
<v Speaker 4>showing his heartache and devastation. But what layers does Sam

0:39:51.685 --> 0:39:55.445
<v Speaker 4>Raimi add being Sam Rami and I assume it's a

0:39:55.565 --> 0:39:59.725
<v Speaker 4>Ramie touch here because it could have been written into

0:39:59.725 --> 0:40:02.885
<v Speaker 4>the script by David cap But not only do I

0:40:02.925 --> 0:40:05.685
<v Speaker 4>trust Matt Singer at least in giving the credit to Ramy,

0:40:05.805 --> 0:40:09.205
<v Speaker 4>it also is part of it, Josh. Where there's no dialogue,

0:40:09.285 --> 0:40:11.965
<v Speaker 4>it's all just physical action that happens. So here again,

0:40:12.005 --> 0:40:14.605
<v Speaker 4>I'm going to give the credit to Ramie in the blocking.

0:40:15.605 --> 0:40:18.125
<v Speaker 4>Think about everything that is going wrong for Peter at

0:40:18.165 --> 0:40:21.325
<v Speaker 4>this point in the movie, beyond his best friend hating

0:40:21.725 --> 0:40:25.605
<v Speaker 4>both him and Spider Man two parts of him and

0:40:26.165 --> 0:40:31.405
<v Speaker 4>MJ forsaking him for another guy. He's doubting whether he

0:40:31.525 --> 0:40:34.445
<v Speaker 4>should continue to be a superhero at all, and his

0:40:34.685 --> 0:40:39.125
<v Speaker 4>powers are fading, like he's at this low point, the

0:40:39.205 --> 0:40:43.605
<v Speaker 4>lowest point he could possibly be. How does Ramie portray

0:40:43.725 --> 0:40:48.165
<v Speaker 4>the emotional ringer that Peter is going through, How everything

0:40:49.045 --> 0:40:51.964
<v Speaker 4>he wants seems to be just out of his reach,

0:40:52.365 --> 0:40:57.364
<v Speaker 4>How he is both part of society but also excluded

0:40:57.445 --> 0:41:02.605
<v Speaker 4>from it. Well, the whole sequence begins with him walking

0:41:02.725 --> 0:41:07.165
<v Speaker 4>into the party and seeing one last ordeure on a

0:41:07.285 --> 0:41:10.885
<v Speaker 4>tray and reaching for it, and right as he reaches

0:41:10.925 --> 0:41:14.525
<v Speaker 4>for it, someone else comes along and grabs it. So

0:41:14.645 --> 0:41:16.884
<v Speaker 4>there you go. He he can't get just that little

0:41:16.965 --> 0:41:23.045
<v Speaker 4>treat that he wants. Okay, fine, he sees we have

0:41:23.205 --> 0:41:26.165
<v Speaker 4>that great mini sequence where he sees MJ arm in

0:41:26.325 --> 0:41:31.245
<v Speaker 4>arm with this perfect man, it seems John. So he

0:41:31.405 --> 0:41:37.565
<v Speaker 4>goes outside another waitress walking around with the tray. This

0:41:37.725 --> 0:41:41.085
<v Speaker 4>one Rainy shoots it so it's at his exact eye level,

0:41:41.205 --> 0:41:44.405
<v Speaker 4>like almost beckoning him to come over and take it.

0:41:45.405 --> 0:41:48.765
<v Speaker 4>One more on the tray, same thing, someone grabs it

0:41:49.085 --> 0:41:51.444
<v Speaker 4>just before, Like he can't even get a bite of food.

0:41:51.485 --> 0:41:54.125
<v Speaker 4>Here at this party, Josh, It's it's that bad. So

0:41:54.245 --> 0:41:57.645
<v Speaker 4>now he's having a conversation outside with MJ. And she

0:41:57.925 --> 0:42:00.364
<v Speaker 4>tells him off how this is just not going to work,

0:42:00.445 --> 0:42:02.565
<v Speaker 4>that she has to move on, that she's going to

0:42:02.645 --> 0:42:04.925
<v Speaker 4>have to, you know, go with this this other you

0:42:05.005 --> 0:42:09.445
<v Speaker 4>know why she's going with this other man and another

0:42:09.965 --> 0:42:12.964
<v Speaker 4>A waiter passes by and and they have one drink

0:42:13.365 --> 0:42:15.165
<v Speaker 4>and it seems like a fancy drink, you know, it's

0:42:15.165 --> 0:42:18.005
<v Speaker 4>got a little teaky hut or something in it, and

0:42:18.165 --> 0:42:21.645
<v Speaker 4>he reaches for it parched, goes to take large gulp

0:42:22.285 --> 0:42:26.605
<v Speaker 4>and it's an empty it's somebody's empty glass. He can't

0:42:26.645 --> 0:42:32.045
<v Speaker 4>even get his thirst satisfied there in the moment, And

0:42:33.365 --> 0:42:35.405
<v Speaker 4>as if that wasn't bad enough, we get that followed

0:42:35.445 --> 0:42:40.045
<v Speaker 4>by the indignity of Harry slapping him twice, and then

0:42:40.085 --> 0:42:42.844
<v Speaker 4>he has to take a photo of the newly engaged

0:42:44.005 --> 0:42:48.325
<v Speaker 4>MJ and John. So, I don't know, satist might be

0:42:48.405 --> 0:42:52.485
<v Speaker 4>putting it mildly. Rady's a monster when you watch the

0:42:52.565 --> 0:42:55.285
<v Speaker 4>scene in terms of the way he treats Peter Parker

0:42:55.685 --> 0:42:58.605
<v Speaker 4>over the course of this four or five minutes, it's

0:42:58.885 --> 0:43:04.125
<v Speaker 4>it's kind of horrible, but also undeniably funny watching poor

0:43:04.245 --> 0:43:08.685
<v Speaker 4>Peter at all, these little steps get denied when the

0:43:08.765 --> 0:43:11.844
<v Speaker 4>poor guy just wants like a crabcake and a drink

0:43:11.925 --> 0:43:14.885
<v Speaker 4>of whatever is in that in that glass. But that

0:43:15.605 --> 0:43:20.245
<v Speaker 4>that's the sensibility that, like I said, almost certainly wasn't

0:43:20.285 --> 0:43:25.965
<v Speaker 4>in the script, that an imaginative director like Raymi brings

0:43:26.005 --> 0:43:28.525
<v Speaker 4>to those films. That makes those first those first two

0:43:28.605 --> 0:43:31.165
<v Speaker 4>films in particular, but parts of the third film as well,

0:43:31.205 --> 0:43:32.485
<v Speaker 4>that makes those films so special.

0:43:33.005 --> 0:43:36.285
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, and the comic aspect is related to, you know, slapstick.

0:43:36.325 --> 0:43:40.605
<v Speaker 1>There's a slapstick element, maybe a slower, slower pace slapstick

0:43:40.645 --> 0:43:42.805
<v Speaker 1>going on here, which I think of as a part

0:43:42.845 --> 0:43:46.125
<v Speaker 1>of Raymie's style as well. And yeah, can't wait hear

0:43:46.165 --> 0:43:50.565
<v Speaker 1>that episode with Matt we should repeat and mentioned maybe

0:43:50.685 --> 0:43:53.485
<v Speaker 1>to plug more his book Spider Man Marvel Spider Man

0:43:54.005 --> 0:43:55.565
<v Speaker 1>from Amazing to Spectacular.

0:43:55.765 --> 0:43:56.685
<v Speaker 4>It's really I.

0:43:56.725 --> 0:43:58.924
<v Speaker 1>Mean, there's so much information in it, but it looks

0:43:58.925 --> 0:44:00.965
<v Speaker 1>beautiful too. And I remember when that came out a

0:44:01.085 --> 0:44:02.964
<v Speaker 1>number of years ago. That was when I was trying

0:44:03.005 --> 0:44:06.085
<v Speaker 1>to get my younger daughter into Spider Man, so bought

0:44:06.165 --> 0:44:09.565
<v Speaker 1>that for her to move her along. It's a really

0:44:09.605 --> 0:44:10.045
<v Speaker 1>great book.

0:44:12.365 --> 0:44:16.205
<v Speaker 4>Before we get to our top two, we would like

0:44:16.325 --> 0:44:18.325
<v Speaker 4>to remind you that you can find all of our

0:44:18.365 --> 0:44:20.725
<v Speaker 4>picks and all of our top five lists over at

0:44:20.725 --> 0:44:23.845
<v Speaker 4>our time five archive Filmspotting dot Net. Just click on

0:44:24.005 --> 0:44:25.885
<v Speaker 4>lists right there at the top of the page. We

0:44:25.925 --> 0:44:29.365
<v Speaker 4>also do link to these scenes whenever we do have

0:44:29.405 --> 0:44:31.844
<v Speaker 4>the clips available, and I think with all of our

0:44:32.085 --> 0:44:35.285
<v Speaker 4>picks for this list, the scenes are available if you'd

0:44:35.365 --> 0:44:40.365
<v Speaker 4>like to watch along as we discuss them. Let's also

0:44:40.685 --> 0:44:44.605
<v Speaker 4>take a minute, Josh to thank the Film Spotting Family

0:44:45.045 --> 0:44:49.965
<v Speaker 4>membership is the single largest support source of support for

0:44:50.045 --> 0:44:52.805
<v Speaker 4>the show. It does keep us doing what we've been

0:44:52.885 --> 0:44:57.325
<v Speaker 4>doing for over twenty one years, and we normally shout

0:44:57.365 --> 0:44:59.445
<v Speaker 4>out a couple of Film Spotting Family members. We will

0:44:59.485 --> 0:45:02.605
<v Speaker 4>get back to doing that, but we wanted to highlight

0:45:02.885 --> 0:45:07.525
<v Speaker 4>again Summer Madness, Summer Film Spotting Family madness, the best

0:45:07.605 --> 0:45:11.245
<v Speaker 4>of the nineteen twenties and thirties. When we left off,

0:45:11.285 --> 0:45:14.125
<v Speaker 4>I think maybe we were announcing the play and round,

0:45:14.285 --> 0:45:17.285
<v Speaker 4>but with our week off we did have Round one.

0:45:17.605 --> 0:45:21.285
<v Speaker 4>It played out and we should give some prop I

0:45:21.365 --> 0:45:24.245
<v Speaker 4>suppose to the selection committee in this case myself and Sam,

0:45:24.645 --> 0:45:28.565
<v Speaker 4>because all the favorites won as I thought would happen.

0:45:29.365 --> 0:45:32.605
<v Speaker 4>Sure it wasn't a case of any major upsets here.

0:45:32.725 --> 0:45:34.725
<v Speaker 4>We did have the favorites advance, though there were a

0:45:34.845 --> 0:45:39.445
<v Speaker 4>couple close matchups. That does mean that round two is

0:45:39.685 --> 0:45:43.645
<v Speaker 4>live as we are recording this. There are eight matchups then,

0:45:44.165 --> 0:45:49.085
<v Speaker 4>and that includes the Wizard of Oz versus Chaplain's Modern Times,

0:45:49.405 --> 0:45:52.765
<v Speaker 4>Metropolis versus King Kong, the Passion of Joan of Arc

0:45:52.885 --> 0:45:56.765
<v Speaker 4>versus Bringing Up Baby. I mean I can vote fairly

0:45:56.845 --> 0:45:58.005
<v Speaker 4>easily in all three of those.

0:45:58.085 --> 0:46:01.885
<v Speaker 1>What about you, Well, this is basically asking me to

0:46:02.045 --> 0:46:04.685
<v Speaker 1>rethink and agonize over my sit and sound top ten

0:46:04.765 --> 0:46:08.444
<v Speaker 1>of all time less right in the constantly shifting order,

0:46:08.645 --> 0:46:13.525
<v Speaker 1>because I believe Wizard of Oz, Modern Times, King Kong, Metropolis.

0:46:14.325 --> 0:46:16.445
<v Speaker 1>I think all four of those have either been on

0:46:18.045 --> 0:46:21.365
<v Speaker 1>my top ten of all time list or circling that

0:46:21.685 --> 0:46:24.765
<v Speaker 1>honor in the various iterations we've done over the years

0:46:25.445 --> 0:46:29.725
<v Speaker 1>on the show here. So I don't know how to

0:46:29.845 --> 0:46:32.965
<v Speaker 1>start thinking about this. I'm going to need a little

0:46:33.005 --> 0:46:37.205
<v Speaker 1>bit of a little bit of time. I can say

0:46:38.805 --> 0:46:40.965
<v Speaker 1>Passion of Joan of Arc versus Bringing Up Baby. That's

0:46:41.005 --> 0:46:44.005
<v Speaker 1>the easy one for me because I only like bringing

0:46:44.125 --> 0:46:47.925
<v Speaker 1>up baby, Whereas Passion of Joan of Arc. You know

0:46:48.245 --> 0:46:51.925
<v Speaker 1>that it's all timer. So that's an easy answer for me.

0:46:52.005 --> 0:46:53.125
<v Speaker 1>I don't know where I'm going to go with the

0:46:53.205 --> 0:46:56.165
<v Speaker 1>other ones, how to even begin thinking about it, which

0:46:56.285 --> 0:46:57.925
<v Speaker 1>is I suppose why we do this thing?

0:46:58.525 --> 0:47:01.885
<v Speaker 4>Yeah, well that's part of it, and certainly a reason

0:47:01.925 --> 0:47:06.765
<v Speaker 4>why we do Madness proper on the show. We've always

0:47:06.805 --> 0:47:11.965
<v Speaker 4>said is discovery. Even though sometimes we're talking about movies,

0:47:12.045 --> 0:47:15.045
<v Speaker 4>you would think everyone knows when we've been doing more

0:47:15.165 --> 0:47:18.965
<v Speaker 4>recent decades, as we go farther back, it is about

0:47:20.005 --> 0:47:23.965
<v Speaker 4>sharing titles that maybe some of our audience hasn't seen,

0:47:24.005 --> 0:47:26.364
<v Speaker 4>and in some cases we haven't seen, and we're doing

0:47:26.405 --> 0:47:29.245
<v Speaker 4>the homework that we need to do as well. So

0:47:29.525 --> 0:47:33.325
<v Speaker 4>case in point, David Colb, a listener who is a

0:47:33.325 --> 0:47:38.085
<v Speaker 4>Film Spotting family member participating in this Madness and had

0:47:38.125 --> 0:47:42.125
<v Speaker 4>a comment in the Film Spotting discord that we wanted

0:47:42.165 --> 0:47:43.885
<v Speaker 4>to share and this, Josh, you can read it. This

0:47:44.765 --> 0:47:48.525
<v Speaker 4>is an example. It's an interesting query that we can

0:47:48.645 --> 0:47:52.085
<v Speaker 4>just throw out to Film Spotting listeners to consider. But

0:47:52.205 --> 0:47:55.845
<v Speaker 4>also I think it just speaks to why we do tournaments,

0:47:56.205 --> 0:48:00.605
<v Speaker 4>silly madness tournaments like this because of a reaction that

0:48:00.765 --> 0:48:02.485
<v Speaker 4>David could have to a film like the Passion of

0:48:02.605 --> 0:48:03.085
<v Speaker 4>Joan of Arc.

0:48:03.685 --> 0:48:05.685
<v Speaker 1>David says, I caught up with the Passion of Joan

0:48:05.725 --> 0:48:08.245
<v Speaker 1>of Arc for this tournament, and I'm confident I will

0:48:08.285 --> 0:48:10.965
<v Speaker 1>be voting for it as long as it survives. One

0:48:11.005 --> 0:48:13.805
<v Speaker 1>of my all time great home viewing experiences in a

0:48:13.845 --> 0:48:16.045
<v Speaker 1>film I could see putting in my letterbox top four.

0:48:16.085 --> 0:48:19.125
<v Speaker 1>At some point that said, a significant part of my

0:48:19.245 --> 0:48:21.725
<v Speaker 1>love for the film was the score that cris Uses,

0:48:21.805 --> 0:48:24.885
<v Speaker 1>which is a nineteen nineties classical work performed by the

0:48:25.005 --> 0:48:28.725
<v Speaker 1>voices of Light Ensemble that was written to accompany the film.

0:48:29.245 --> 0:48:31.325
<v Speaker 1>For the purposes of this tournament, how do you all

0:48:31.485 --> 0:48:35.685
<v Speaker 1>evaluate silent films that have soundtracks that were written much later?

0:48:36.245 --> 0:48:38.965
<v Speaker 1>Is it possible to separate these aspects of the film,

0:48:39.045 --> 0:48:39.965
<v Speaker 1>and if so, should we?

0:48:40.645 --> 0:48:40.844
<v Speaker 4>Well?

0:48:41.445 --> 0:48:44.725
<v Speaker 1>Thank you David for participating and yet taking the time

0:48:44.765 --> 0:48:48.365
<v Speaker 1>to watch Joan of Arc. This is a question that

0:48:48.405 --> 0:48:51.725
<v Speaker 1>has long bedeviled me, and I've avoided trying to come

0:48:51.805 --> 0:48:56.045
<v Speaker 1>up with a conclusive answer because oftentimes, when you're trying

0:48:56.045 --> 0:49:00.085
<v Speaker 1>to track down older films like this, you're viewing options

0:49:00.365 --> 0:49:05.725
<v Speaker 1>are limited, let alone your score options. But I think

0:49:05.765 --> 0:49:08.965
<v Speaker 1>it's a really important question and I'm sure a film

0:49:09.125 --> 0:49:14.925
<v Speaker 1>historian would have a decisive opinion on it. I think

0:49:15.005 --> 0:49:19.765
<v Speaker 1>my instinct usually if I'm looking for options, is if

0:49:19.805 --> 0:49:23.125
<v Speaker 1>there is any sort of original now with silent films,

0:49:23.165 --> 0:49:26.085
<v Speaker 1>of course there's no like original original, right, but if

0:49:26.085 --> 0:49:30.925
<v Speaker 1>there has been historical work done where this piece was

0:49:31.045 --> 0:49:35.885
<v Speaker 1>often used to accompany, you know, the earliest screenings of

0:49:35.925 --> 0:49:39.325
<v Speaker 1>the silent film that we can go back and actually pinpoint,

0:49:39.645 --> 0:49:41.605
<v Speaker 1>then I would go with that just kind of be

0:49:42.085 --> 0:49:47.245
<v Speaker 1>sort of a purist historically, But there are many films

0:49:47.325 --> 0:49:51.645
<v Speaker 1>that older films that have used contemporary scores in the

0:49:51.725 --> 0:49:55.765
<v Speaker 1>way the one David is talking about that probably work

0:49:56.045 --> 0:50:00.885
<v Speaker 1>better and sound better and serve the story better. So

0:50:01.525 --> 0:50:04.205
<v Speaker 1>I don't know if the historical purity route is necessarily

0:50:04.285 --> 0:50:06.485
<v Speaker 1>the best defense it.

0:50:07.045 --> 0:50:10.725
<v Speaker 4>It is so tough. But maybe this is obvious and

0:50:10.805 --> 0:50:14.325
<v Speaker 4>not really what David is getting into, because I understand

0:50:14.405 --> 0:50:19.005
<v Speaker 4>as you're suggesting there's a larger philosophical conundrum here. But

0:50:19.245 --> 0:50:23.405
<v Speaker 4>for the purposes of something like Madness, your choice is

0:50:24.085 --> 0:50:26.045
<v Speaker 4>your choice, and it's what you're limited to. It may

0:50:26.125 --> 0:50:28.765
<v Speaker 4>simply be a case that if you only have access

0:50:28.965 --> 0:50:31.885
<v Speaker 4>to something like the Criterion version of it with the

0:50:31.925 --> 0:50:36.845
<v Speaker 4>score and for our arbitrary needs, you're weighing it against

0:50:36.885 --> 0:50:39.445
<v Speaker 4>the Adventures of Robin Hood, and you watch both films

0:50:39.485 --> 0:50:42.205
<v Speaker 4>and you have to pick one that that you like more.

0:50:42.925 --> 0:50:46.325
<v Speaker 4>All you can do is go off the version of

0:50:46.405 --> 0:50:48.565
<v Speaker 4>The Passion of Joan of Arc that you saw, and

0:50:49.325 --> 0:50:51.685
<v Speaker 4>I don't need to overthink it any more any more

0:50:51.765 --> 0:50:54.485
<v Speaker 4>than that. I think we always want to default to

0:50:55.445 --> 0:50:58.285
<v Speaker 4>as close to original versions as we can find of something.

0:50:58.405 --> 0:51:05.205
<v Speaker 4>But if it proves to be too difficult, I don't

0:51:05.245 --> 0:51:07.765
<v Speaker 4>know what else you can do. Right, So it is

0:51:08.245 --> 0:51:12.005
<v Speaker 4>a very interesting question, and I haven't had a chance

0:51:12.085 --> 0:51:13.925
<v Speaker 4>yet to look. I'm curious what people in the Film

0:51:13.965 --> 0:51:17.565
<v Speaker 4>Spotting Family discord have had to say in response to David.

0:51:17.685 --> 0:51:20.245
<v Speaker 4>I will check that out. Other Film Spotting Family members

0:51:20.325 --> 0:51:22.045
<v Speaker 4>can do that as well well, because they have access

0:51:22.525 --> 0:51:25.285
<v Speaker 4>to that discord, they have access to the tournament, they

0:51:25.325 --> 0:51:28.924
<v Speaker 4>get other benefits like our Film Spotting Family newsletter where

0:51:29.085 --> 0:51:33.485
<v Speaker 4>these matchups and the polls go live every week. You

0:51:33.565 --> 0:51:35.765
<v Speaker 4>can get access to all of this stuff, including our

0:51:35.805 --> 0:51:39.924
<v Speaker 4>monthly bonus shows, for as little as five dollars a month,

0:51:39.965 --> 0:51:42.605
<v Speaker 4>and we do have a current promotion going on now

0:51:42.765 --> 0:51:44.965
<v Speaker 4>where it's even less than that through the month of

0:51:45.005 --> 0:51:47.605
<v Speaker 4>August our Summer promotion, and all you have to do

0:51:47.765 --> 0:51:51.365
<v Speaker 4>is use the promo code Summer. You'll get twenty percent

0:51:51.445 --> 0:51:55.885
<v Speaker 4>off any Film Spotting Family membership. That's any monthly or

0:51:56.005 --> 0:51:59.325
<v Speaker 4>annual membership twenty percent off through August. Just use the

0:51:59.405 --> 0:52:03.245
<v Speaker 4>promo code Summer. We thank all of our Film Spotting

0:52:03.285 --> 0:52:16.765
<v Speaker 4>Family members for their support. A couple of quick notes

0:52:16.805 --> 0:52:20.365
<v Speaker 4>before we round out our top five Spider Man scenes.

0:52:20.365 --> 0:52:23.125
<v Speaker 4>We have two more picks left. You brought to my

0:52:23.245 --> 0:52:28.125
<v Speaker 4>attention a really fine article by Richard Roper talking about

0:52:28.325 --> 0:52:30.125
<v Speaker 4>something I don't know how many of our listeners are

0:52:30.205 --> 0:52:32.725
<v Speaker 4>aware of. They've maybe heard about it a little bit

0:52:32.885 --> 0:52:37.925
<v Speaker 4>over the years, this mysterious Lake Street screening room that

0:52:38.245 --> 0:52:40.965
<v Speaker 4>the two of us have both had the honor, quite frankly,

0:52:41.085 --> 0:52:46.005
<v Speaker 4>the privilege of sitting in. And it does seem it's

0:52:46.085 --> 0:52:49.725
<v Speaker 4>maybe not imminent. We don't know the exact route it's

0:52:49.765 --> 0:52:51.485
<v Speaker 4>going to take or what the timing is going to be,

0:52:51.645 --> 0:52:54.884
<v Speaker 4>but it does certainly seem based on Richard Roper's article,

0:52:54.925 --> 0:52:56.685
<v Speaker 4>which we will link to in our show notes if

0:52:56.685 --> 0:52:58.365
<v Speaker 4>you would like to read it, it does seem like

0:52:59.245 --> 0:53:02.404
<v Speaker 4>the Lake Street Screening Room may be no more, which

0:53:02.485 --> 0:53:04.605
<v Speaker 4>is really sad to think of when you consider all

0:53:04.685 --> 0:53:07.685
<v Speaker 4>the history that is in that room. So this may

0:53:07.765 --> 0:53:10.085
<v Speaker 4>be a little inside baseball, but hey, this is a

0:53:10.165 --> 0:53:13.205
<v Speaker 4>film criticism show and it's something that we did want

0:53:13.245 --> 0:53:15.085
<v Speaker 4>to spend a minute on. We have to.

0:53:15.205 --> 0:53:18.165
<v Speaker 1>The history is so rich. This article by Richard Roper

0:53:18.925 --> 0:53:22.765
<v Speaker 1>is really good, just very reflective, and based on my

0:53:22.925 --> 0:53:27.125
<v Speaker 1>experience attending there over the I guess decades, now captures

0:53:27.165 --> 0:53:28.925
<v Speaker 1>it quite well. So we'll link to it. It's at

0:53:29.005 --> 0:53:32.965
<v Speaker 1>roderibert dot com. Appropriately because this was the home of

0:53:33.125 --> 0:53:36.965
<v Speaker 1>Roger Ebert and Gene Siskel from the early newspaper years,

0:53:37.245 --> 0:53:43.965
<v Speaker 1>all throughout their television show. And I do remember when

0:53:44.045 --> 0:53:46.685
<v Speaker 1>I first got a chance to go, probably mid to

0:53:46.805 --> 0:53:50.765
<v Speaker 1>late nineties, maybe a forty seat, it's probably in the article.

0:53:51.005 --> 0:53:53.565
<v Speaker 1>I should should know this offhand, but not a very

0:53:53.605 --> 0:53:56.285
<v Speaker 1>big room. And when I got a chance to go,

0:53:56.685 --> 0:53:59.765
<v Speaker 1>writing a freelance movie review for a newspaper, feeling like

0:53:59.845 --> 0:54:03.844
<v Speaker 1>I was entering the Holy of holies because they were

0:54:03.885 --> 0:54:07.364
<v Speaker 1>all there, Ebert and Ciscol, but also at the time

0:54:07.525 --> 0:54:12.325
<v Speaker 1>Michael Wilmington Chicago Tribune critic as well, alongside Ciscol, Jonathan

0:54:12.445 --> 0:54:16.325
<v Speaker 1>Rosenbaum Chicago Reader critic. I mean people I had been

0:54:16.565 --> 0:54:20.924
<v Speaker 1>had grown up reading religiously, and here I was sitting

0:54:21.405 --> 0:54:26.885
<v Speaker 1>in an intimidatingly small screening room with them, And so

0:54:27.085 --> 0:54:30.805
<v Speaker 1>it was that. It was also just the idiosyncratic nature

0:54:30.845 --> 0:54:34.125
<v Speaker 1>of it. It's in this high rise, you know, sixteen

0:54:34.205 --> 0:54:38.085
<v Speaker 1>middle sixteenth floor of an unassuming high rise, which I

0:54:38.165 --> 0:54:40.405
<v Speaker 1>think the building's being sold, which is why the occasion

0:54:40.485 --> 0:54:43.565
<v Speaker 1>for this article or has been sold. And yeah, you

0:54:43.725 --> 0:54:45.924
<v Speaker 1>just walked in and you'd go up and there would

0:54:45.925 --> 0:54:47.805
<v Speaker 1>be this room and there'd be all these folks and

0:54:48.485 --> 0:54:52.525
<v Speaker 1>you'd get to watch these movies in advance. And it's faded.

0:54:52.805 --> 0:54:53.005
<v Speaker 2>You know.

0:54:53.285 --> 0:54:55.245
<v Speaker 1>I think I've only been there once, maybe within the

0:54:55.365 --> 0:54:59.605
<v Speaker 1>last year or so. More screenings are being held just

0:54:59.805 --> 0:55:03.924
<v Speaker 1>in you know, larger theater chains around the city. And yeah,

0:55:04.005 --> 0:55:07.884
<v Speaker 1>the quality is the other thing of the presentation though.

0:55:08.285 --> 0:55:12.805
<v Speaker 1>And Richard Roper interviews Steve Kraus, who's been the projectionists

0:55:12.845 --> 0:55:16.605
<v Speaker 1>and really the running the whole space all this time,

0:55:17.245 --> 0:55:19.205
<v Speaker 1>and you just knew that it was going to be

0:55:19.845 --> 0:55:24.285
<v Speaker 1>pristine or what the format, and that's something you know,

0:55:24.445 --> 0:55:28.205
<v Speaker 1>when you're going to a wider chain for press screenings,

0:55:28.285 --> 0:55:32.285
<v Speaker 1>you don't always get Let's just say the framing for

0:55:32.365 --> 0:55:35.765
<v Speaker 1>the Odyssey press screening was a little bit, you know,

0:55:35.925 --> 0:55:38.765
<v Speaker 1>it wasn't quite even on the screen. It wasn't disastrous.

0:55:38.845 --> 0:55:41.725
<v Speaker 1>We got the whole picture, but just being there reminded

0:55:41.765 --> 0:55:43.325
<v Speaker 1>me again of what you would get from the Lake

0:55:43.365 --> 0:55:45.605
<v Speaker 1>Street screening room. So yeah, I don't know if were

0:55:45.645 --> 0:55:48.205
<v Speaker 1>we ever there together, Adam. I think by the time

0:55:48.245 --> 0:55:50.165
<v Speaker 1>I was doing the show, it was being used less

0:55:50.205 --> 0:55:53.045
<v Speaker 1>and less, but I'm sure there were a couple instances

0:55:53.125 --> 0:55:54.325
<v Speaker 1>where we caught something there.

0:55:54.525 --> 0:55:58.685
<v Speaker 4>Absolutely there were, And it's so funny how over the

0:55:58.805 --> 0:56:02.605
<v Speaker 4>years now it's hard to remember exactly how many times,

0:56:02.685 --> 0:56:06.365
<v Speaker 4>but I know for sure because I remember referencing and

0:56:06.445 --> 0:56:08.285
<v Speaker 4>this doesn't happen very often that I do this, but

0:56:08.365 --> 0:56:12.885
<v Speaker 4>I remember referencing the muted response to the Grand Budapest

0:56:13.005 --> 0:56:15.285
<v Speaker 4>Hotel the first time I reviewed it, and it was

0:56:15.365 --> 0:56:18.325
<v Speaker 4>the critics response in the room, and we were all

0:56:18.405 --> 0:56:21.445
<v Speaker 4>together watching it in the Lake Street screen room the

0:56:21.485 --> 0:56:24.685
<v Speaker 4>first time I saw that movie, I think two thousand

0:56:24.685 --> 0:56:29.125
<v Speaker 4>and late two thousand and six, early two thousand and seven,

0:56:29.245 --> 0:56:30.645
<v Speaker 4>so just about a year and a half or two

0:56:30.725 --> 0:56:34.925
<v Speaker 4>years into film spotting was when we finally did get

0:56:35.005 --> 0:56:41.325
<v Speaker 4>access to that room and absolutely feeling like you had arrived,

0:56:41.765 --> 0:56:44.725
<v Speaker 4>And you especially felt like you'd arrived when you walk

0:56:44.805 --> 0:56:47.685
<v Speaker 4>in and there's Roger Ebert, and no one had to

0:56:47.765 --> 0:56:51.245
<v Speaker 4>tell you that that was his place in the back.

0:56:52.245 --> 0:56:55.965
<v Speaker 4>You knew that, you knew that if he was sitting there,

0:56:56.085 --> 0:56:58.364
<v Speaker 4>that had to be his spot, and he was going

0:56:58.445 --> 0:57:01.685
<v Speaker 4>to sit there every time, and you would not ever

0:57:02.365 --> 0:57:06.245
<v Speaker 4>dare to sit in that seat. And I did pretty

0:57:06.325 --> 0:57:09.205
<v Speaker 4>much always find a seat just in like the third

0:57:09.325 --> 0:57:12.125
<v Speaker 4>row middle. But that's the other thing about this that

0:57:12.165 --> 0:57:14.605
<v Speaker 4>I did want to mention, Josh, is that I think

0:57:15.005 --> 0:57:17.005
<v Speaker 4>when you hear about this place and you think about

0:57:17.045 --> 0:57:20.325
<v Speaker 4>like Ciskel and Ebert being here at this private screening

0:57:20.365 --> 0:57:23.005
<v Speaker 4>room for critics, the image in your mind you talk

0:57:23.005 --> 0:57:25.125
<v Speaker 4>about the great presentation, which it was, the image in

0:57:25.165 --> 0:57:31.805
<v Speaker 4>your mind is of this pristine, immaculate sort of place.

0:57:32.845 --> 0:57:36.005
<v Speaker 4>And it's not that it was run down or tawdry

0:57:36.125 --> 0:57:39.085
<v Speaker 4>or anything, but it also always felt to me just

0:57:39.405 --> 0:57:43.405
<v Speaker 4>very working class and just very much a space where

0:57:43.965 --> 0:57:47.485
<v Speaker 4>working working critics for there to see the movie they

0:57:47.565 --> 0:57:50.885
<v Speaker 4>had to see and then go do the work that

0:57:50.965 --> 0:57:53.045
<v Speaker 4>they had to do in response to that movie. It

0:57:53.165 --> 0:57:57.365
<v Speaker 4>wasn't it wasn't there to be some howload movie house.

0:57:57.485 --> 0:58:00.565
<v Speaker 4>It was. It was there to project to you a

0:58:01.445 --> 0:58:04.605
<v Speaker 4>good picture and good sound and a comfortable seat.

0:58:05.365 --> 0:58:05.725
<v Speaker 2>It was not.

0:58:05.925 --> 0:58:07.965
<v Speaker 1>It was not gilded, and there was a lot of

0:58:08.005 --> 0:58:10.525
<v Speaker 1>food being brought in. No I can remember, you know,

0:58:10.765 --> 0:58:13.805
<v Speaker 1>in my heyday when I was, you know, working as

0:58:13.845 --> 0:58:16.445
<v Speaker 1>a daily critic, I would see three in a day.

0:58:16.845 --> 0:58:20.285
<v Speaker 1>You'd have fifteen minutes between the ten am got out

0:58:20.725 --> 0:58:23.525
<v Speaker 1>and the twelve fifteen would start to run down to

0:58:23.565 --> 0:58:25.725
<v Speaker 1>a hot dog stand and bring it back up before

0:58:25.765 --> 0:58:28.045
<v Speaker 1>the next one started. So there's a lot of crinkling

0:58:28.125 --> 0:58:30.285
<v Speaker 1>of papers, and yeah, you're right. It was not like

0:58:30.405 --> 0:58:34.045
<v Speaker 1>this haloed museum, which was part of its charm. And

0:58:34.525 --> 0:58:38.085
<v Speaker 1>it's interesting you mentioned that about the hush reception to

0:58:38.085 --> 0:58:40.765
<v Speaker 1>Grand Budapest Hotel. You know, one of the things I

0:58:40.845 --> 0:58:44.325
<v Speaker 1>do appreciate about these larger screenings we have more often now,

0:58:44.845 --> 0:58:47.805
<v Speaker 1>often with audiences who have won tickets to see it,

0:58:48.525 --> 0:58:52.405
<v Speaker 1>is that there's not that sort of and this didn't

0:58:52.445 --> 0:58:56.365
<v Speaker 1>always happen, but that sort of reserved air of caution

0:58:57.005 --> 0:58:58.925
<v Speaker 1>that would definitely be in that room. And I was

0:58:58.965 --> 0:59:01.005
<v Speaker 1>a part of it. Like you know, especially when you're new,

0:59:01.605 --> 0:59:06.165
<v Speaker 1>you don't want your your reactions to be heard by

0:59:06.285 --> 0:59:09.365
<v Speaker 1>Roger because what if he's not feeling the same, you know,

0:59:09.565 --> 0:59:11.405
<v Speaker 1>So you're dealing with that sort of thing. And I

0:59:11.445 --> 0:59:13.685
<v Speaker 1>think that just kind of became or people just wanted

0:59:13.685 --> 0:59:16.845
<v Speaker 1>to keep their reactions close, you know, not let it known,

0:59:17.125 --> 0:59:18.805
<v Speaker 1>let it be known how they feel about the movie,

0:59:19.205 --> 0:59:22.365
<v Speaker 1>which is maybe one of the downs sides of a

0:59:22.485 --> 0:59:24.765
<v Speaker 1>situation like that compared to a bigger theater where you

0:59:24.805 --> 0:59:27.765
<v Speaker 1>could let loose a little bit. But yet, you know,

0:59:27.805 --> 0:59:31.285
<v Speaker 1>there probably won't be anything like it again, just the

0:59:31.325 --> 0:59:35.285
<v Speaker 1>way media has gone and you know, film film.

0:59:35.125 --> 0:59:36.125
<v Speaker 4>Reviewing and.

0:59:37.765 --> 0:59:42.605
<v Speaker 1>The whole the whole process has changed. There's you know,

0:59:42.685 --> 0:59:45.725
<v Speaker 1>as many influencers as critics at some of these screenings now,

0:59:46.365 --> 0:59:49.005
<v Speaker 1>which is fine, but it's just a different it's a

0:59:49.165 --> 0:59:51.645
<v Speaker 1>whole different experience than what could be had at the

0:59:51.725 --> 0:59:53.085
<v Speaker 1>Lake Street Screening Room for sure.

0:59:53.845 --> 0:59:56.845
<v Speaker 4>Again, we will link to the article in our show notes.

0:59:56.885 --> 0:59:59.885
<v Speaker 4>It is a very interesting read if you're curious to

1:00:00.005 --> 1:00:02.925
<v Speaker 4>check out Richard Roper's piece. We now move on to

1:00:03.605 --> 1:00:06.765
<v Speaker 4>our deeply flawed film spotting poll. It probably is deeply

1:00:06.845 --> 1:00:09.525
<v Speaker 4>flawed because we don't need all of these choices, but

1:00:09.645 --> 1:00:12.285
<v Speaker 4>we're going to give them to you anyway. Your task

1:00:12.485 --> 1:00:16.045
<v Speaker 4>is to choose one and only one Spider Man film.

1:00:16.325 --> 1:00:19.285
<v Speaker 4>I guess that's how we do it. We're applying it's

1:00:19.405 --> 1:00:24.085
<v Speaker 4>unwritten here, but it is implicit that the Incinerator is

1:00:24.405 --> 1:00:28.085
<v Speaker 4>at work here, Josh behind the scenes, and only one

1:00:28.125 --> 1:00:30.325
<v Speaker 4>of these movies survive. So which one is it? In

1:00:30.485 --> 1:00:31.445
<v Speaker 4>chronological order?

1:00:31.525 --> 1:00:34.685
<v Speaker 1>The options are, Yeah, the Incinerator has a generator, so

1:00:34.805 --> 1:00:38.565
<v Speaker 1>it's never offline. Okay, So our option Spider Man two

1:00:38.605 --> 1:00:41.005
<v Speaker 1>thousand and two, Spider Man two from two thousand and four,

1:00:41.845 --> 1:00:46.565
<v Speaker 1>into the Spider Verse, Spider Man Homecoming, and then across

1:00:46.725 --> 1:00:49.405
<v Speaker 1>the Spider Verse. So there's a couple of challenges here.

1:00:49.485 --> 1:00:51.925
<v Speaker 1>We are going to include the option of other as well.

1:00:52.205 --> 1:00:55.365
<v Speaker 1>For you Andrew Garfield fans, there's two things you have

1:00:55.445 --> 1:00:59.845
<v Speaker 1>to decide. Am I going Spider Verse or live action?

1:01:00.645 --> 1:01:05.885
<v Speaker 1>And then among that choice, which live Action or which

1:01:05.925 --> 1:01:10.605
<v Speaker 1>Spider Verse I'm gonna I'm I'm still thinking my way

1:01:10.725 --> 1:01:13.965
<v Speaker 1>through this, so give me, give me twenty seconds or so.

1:01:15.205 --> 1:01:17.725
<v Speaker 4>Do you have Do you have any Yeah, I can

1:01:17.805 --> 1:01:20.005
<v Speaker 4>banter a little bit, but I'm just going to stall

1:01:20.125 --> 1:01:22.045
<v Speaker 4>as well because I've been thinking about this. But I

1:01:22.125 --> 1:01:24.685
<v Speaker 4>was thinking about it before we'd even come to this

1:01:24.765 --> 1:01:26.965
<v Speaker 4>poll question, just as I was doing the top five list,

1:01:27.005 --> 1:01:31.645
<v Speaker 4>because I feel like I'm a little bit on the

1:01:31.725 --> 1:01:34.445
<v Speaker 4>outside when it comes to the conventional wisdom on this,

1:01:35.845 --> 1:01:39.165
<v Speaker 4>and that is that there's a reason why we picked

1:01:39.445 --> 1:01:43.365
<v Speaker 4>for movie Deathmatch, and we did consider what various people

1:01:43.445 --> 1:01:45.565
<v Speaker 4>had to say and consult various lists. There's a reason

1:01:45.605 --> 1:01:50.605
<v Speaker 4>why we picked to represent the live action, we picked

1:01:50.645 --> 1:01:53.165
<v Speaker 4>Spider Man two, and there's a reason why we picked

1:01:53.685 --> 1:01:55.805
<v Speaker 4>into the Spider Verse. Now, part of picking into the

1:01:55.845 --> 1:01:58.285
<v Speaker 4>Spider Verse may have actually had to do with it

1:01:58.445 --> 1:02:03.485
<v Speaker 4>being the first animated one, and so it felt revolutionary,

1:02:03.565 --> 1:02:07.125
<v Speaker 4>and Spider Man two actually felt more like the culmination,

1:02:07.365 --> 1:02:10.405
<v Speaker 4>the pinnacle of what Raymie was doing. I'm not going

1:02:10.485 --> 1:02:12.365
<v Speaker 4>to get into it anymore than that, but that's my

1:02:12.845 --> 1:02:18.245
<v Speaker 4>quick armchair assessment for me, And I want to note

1:02:18.725 --> 1:02:21.485
<v Speaker 4>I have not rewatched, other than scanning scenes for the

1:02:21.565 --> 1:02:24.565
<v Speaker 4>top five. I have not sat and rewatched in one

1:02:24.645 --> 1:02:28.845
<v Speaker 4>sitting fully focused taking notes for a review Spider Man two.

1:02:29.285 --> 1:02:33.365
<v Speaker 4>But I have done that fairly recently with well fairly recently,

1:02:33.525 --> 1:02:36.765
<v Speaker 4>like eight years ago or whenever it was for Spider

1:02:36.885 --> 1:02:38.725
<v Speaker 4>not eight years ago, three years ago four years ago

1:02:38.805 --> 1:02:41.725
<v Speaker 4>for Spider Man, for Spider Man the Original, right, because

1:02:41.765 --> 1:02:45.325
<v Speaker 4>it's twentieth anniversary in twenty twenty two, So that is

1:02:45.685 --> 1:02:48.365
<v Speaker 4>that is lingering in my mind. But my point is

1:02:48.645 --> 1:02:50.725
<v Speaker 4>is that when I think about those first two movies,

1:02:51.085 --> 1:02:53.285
<v Speaker 4>I feel like the conventional wisdom is that Spider Man

1:02:53.365 --> 1:02:57.645
<v Speaker 4>two is the greater achievement and Spider Man the first

1:02:57.725 --> 1:03:01.805
<v Speaker 4>one is the one that is stronger. In my memory.

1:03:02.605 --> 1:03:06.405
<v Speaker 4>There are scenes that are have have stayed with me

1:03:07.045 --> 1:03:11.045
<v Speaker 4>Josh in a greater way, and I feel like it

1:03:11.405 --> 1:03:14.165
<v Speaker 4>it has edged out Spider Man two for me if

1:03:14.165 --> 1:03:16.525
<v Speaker 4>I'm just picking between them. So I'm off on that.

1:03:16.765 --> 1:03:21.005
<v Speaker 4>And here's where I'm off on the animated films, especially

1:03:21.205 --> 1:03:22.845
<v Speaker 4>if you look at which I did, if you look

1:03:22.925 --> 1:03:26.645
<v Speaker 4>back at my notes for those two films, I have

1:03:27.005 --> 1:03:30.205
<v Speaker 4>way more interesting things to say and in my mind,

1:03:30.325 --> 1:03:34.525
<v Speaker 4>deeper things to say about across the Spider Verse than

1:03:34.565 --> 1:03:37.525
<v Speaker 4>I do into the Spider Verse. Across the Spider Verse

1:03:37.965 --> 1:03:42.325
<v Speaker 4>connected with me and resonated with me in a way

1:03:42.405 --> 1:03:45.325
<v Speaker 4>more meaningful way than into the Spider Verse did. Now,

1:03:45.405 --> 1:03:48.205
<v Speaker 4>maybe maybe I just saw it on a better day

1:03:48.925 --> 1:03:51.365
<v Speaker 4>and I was more in tune to what was happening

1:03:51.405 --> 1:03:55.085
<v Speaker 4>and I was paying closer attention, but I can't change

1:03:55.125 --> 1:03:57.685
<v Speaker 4>that I had the deeper reaction to across the Spider Verse.

1:03:57.725 --> 1:04:00.845
<v Speaker 4>So I feel like in both cases, I'm I'm going

1:04:00.885 --> 1:04:02.045
<v Speaker 4>against the grain a little bit.

1:04:02.685 --> 1:04:05.765
<v Speaker 1>I think you're right that consensus would stay, would say

1:04:05.965 --> 1:04:08.445
<v Speaker 1>not overall, But between the live action Spider Man two,

1:04:09.445 --> 1:04:11.405
<v Speaker 1>I'm not sure. I don't have a good sense for

1:04:11.605 --> 1:04:16.205
<v Speaker 1>which Spider Verse is considered better. It might be across,

1:04:16.925 --> 1:04:19.205
<v Speaker 1>as you're saying, I'm going to lean on, and I

1:04:19.285 --> 1:04:21.445
<v Speaker 1>know it's not in the language here we just presented,

1:04:21.525 --> 1:04:25.925
<v Speaker 1>but somewhere maybe it was in slack somewhere. I think

1:04:26.365 --> 1:04:32.725
<v Speaker 1>Sam used the word definitive, and I'm latching onto that

1:04:33.245 --> 1:04:35.965
<v Speaker 1>because I found it very helpful. Okay, it's gonna help

1:04:36.005 --> 1:04:41.285
<v Speaker 1>me weave a path towards my choice here. I think

1:04:41.445 --> 1:04:44.405
<v Speaker 1>one of these Spider Verse films are probably better as

1:04:44.565 --> 1:04:50.005
<v Speaker 1>films just in terms of the inventiveness, the craft. The

1:04:51.565 --> 1:04:53.845
<v Speaker 1>and the live action have these, but the level at

1:04:53.885 --> 1:04:59.725
<v Speaker 1>which it's operating inventedness, craft, visual elements, and balance of

1:05:00.005 --> 1:05:03.965
<v Speaker 1>action and humor. One of those is probably the better film.

1:05:04.445 --> 1:05:07.925
<v Speaker 1>But I'm gonna stick with definitive and for me, neither

1:05:07.965 --> 1:05:11.045
<v Speaker 1>of those is possible. Those are the movies we need now.

1:05:11.165 --> 1:05:14.765
<v Speaker 1>Where we've been churning our way through superheroes, let alone

1:05:14.805 --> 1:05:18.565
<v Speaker 1>Spider Man for decades. Now, we need those types of

1:05:18.685 --> 1:05:23.925
<v Speaker 1>movies now that are rethinking the entire superhero project in

1:05:24.165 --> 1:05:28.685
<v Speaker 1>very smart and entertaining ways. Not exhaustive ways, which we've

1:05:28.685 --> 1:05:32.445
<v Speaker 1>also seen elsewhere, but definitive for me. I go back

1:05:32.445 --> 1:05:35.125
<v Speaker 1>to the live action and I do as well as

1:05:35.205 --> 1:05:37.885
<v Speaker 1>you go back to the First Spider Man. I just

1:05:38.085 --> 1:05:41.205
<v Speaker 1>think it's where and maybe we should get back to

1:05:41.245 --> 1:05:43.485
<v Speaker 1>our list soon because I think we'll be talking about

1:05:43.485 --> 1:05:46.765
<v Speaker 1>this with one of the picks. It's where what I

1:05:46.885 --> 1:05:52.125
<v Speaker 1>had been waiting for my whole life to see on

1:05:52.205 --> 1:05:55.325
<v Speaker 1>the big screen and hoping they wouldn't mess it up,

1:05:55.965 --> 1:05:57.805
<v Speaker 1>And not only did they not mess it up, but

1:05:57.925 --> 1:06:01.565
<v Speaker 1>they actually made it work. And so that's why I'm

1:06:01.605 --> 1:06:03.765
<v Speaker 1>going to go back to the first First Spider Man.

1:06:05.325 --> 1:06:08.925
<v Speaker 4>That is where I'm going to vote as well. Spider Man,

1:06:09.165 --> 1:06:11.525
<v Speaker 4>we would like to know your thoughts. Can't wait to

1:06:11.525 --> 1:06:13.085
<v Speaker 4>see how this one comes out. You can vote in

1:06:13.125 --> 1:06:15.925
<v Speaker 4>that poll and leave a comment. We'll share your feedback

1:06:16.045 --> 1:06:18.845
<v Speaker 4>here in a couple of weeks. Vote at film spotting

1:06:19.365 --> 1:06:33.045
<v Speaker 4>dot net. Let's do then transition Josh very smoothly back

1:06:33.125 --> 1:06:36.725
<v Speaker 4>into our top five, and honestly based on the conversation

1:06:36.845 --> 1:06:39.085
<v Speaker 4>we just had. I don't know that it could go

1:06:39.245 --> 1:06:42.165
<v Speaker 4>any smoother, at least with my top two picks, but

1:06:42.925 --> 1:06:46.285
<v Speaker 4>we have a listener. Voicemail came in just under the wire,

1:06:47.605 --> 1:06:50.285
<v Speaker 4>and I think it will help us because it will

1:06:50.405 --> 1:06:55.325
<v Speaker 4>make this list feel complete. It will allow us to

1:06:55.365 --> 1:06:59.245
<v Speaker 4>feel like we gave every Spider Man his due. It

1:06:59.445 --> 1:07:04.365
<v Speaker 4>turns out that there is some love for Andrew Garfield

1:07:04.485 --> 1:07:09.805
<v Speaker 4>Spider Man, and it comes from a bona fide expert

1:07:10.765 --> 1:07:13.925
<v Speaker 4>on Spider Man. Let's go ahead and hear the credentials

1:07:14.325 --> 1:07:16.805
<v Speaker 4>and the choice of Drew Jeffries I.

1:07:16.845 --> 1:07:20.405
<v Speaker 5>Film Spotting, longtime listener at Drew Jeffries here. So I

1:07:20.565 --> 1:07:24.405
<v Speaker 5>teach a university class on superhero films. I'm also the

1:07:24.565 --> 1:07:27.725
<v Speaker 5>author of an academic book called Comic Book Film Style,

1:07:28.525 --> 1:07:30.845
<v Speaker 5>but perhaps more pertinention of this week's top five. I

1:07:31.005 --> 1:07:33.685
<v Speaker 5>also have that meme with the two Spider Man pointing

1:07:33.725 --> 1:07:36.405
<v Speaker 5>at each other literally tattooed on my body. I have

1:07:36.485 --> 1:07:39.645
<v Speaker 5>one Spider Man on each sigh. So when I found

1:07:39.645 --> 1:07:42.325
<v Speaker 5>out y'all were doing your top five Spider Man scenes,

1:07:42.525 --> 1:07:44.845
<v Speaker 5>I knew I had to send in a quick note.

1:07:45.685 --> 1:07:48.205
<v Speaker 5>Now I have love for every iteration of Spider Man,

1:07:48.325 --> 1:07:51.285
<v Speaker 5>but the Andrew Garfield of a Stone Amazing Spider Man

1:07:51.445 --> 1:07:54.805
<v Speaker 5>is actually at the top of my list in part.

1:07:54.885 --> 1:07:56.885
<v Speaker 5>I just find their chemistry as a couple to be

1:07:57.365 --> 1:08:00.925
<v Speaker 5>so undeniable. I'd actually put them at number one on

1:08:01.245 --> 1:08:05.325
<v Speaker 5>my personal list of movie couples, full stop.

1:08:05.405 --> 1:08:06.045
<v Speaker 4>And no offense.

1:08:06.085 --> 1:08:09.965
<v Speaker 2>But you're wrong. You're wrong about us being on different paths,

1:08:10.285 --> 1:08:11.885
<v Speaker 2>on different paths from my path.

1:08:13.525 --> 1:08:15.045
<v Speaker 4>And you're always going to be my path.

1:08:15.565 --> 1:08:17.885
<v Speaker 5>But I'm going with a more traditional Spider scene for

1:08:18.005 --> 1:08:21.285
<v Speaker 5>my pick, which is a swing scene across New York's city.

1:08:21.765 --> 1:08:25.005
<v Speaker 5>This one comes towards the end of the movie. Spider's hurt.

1:08:25.245 --> 1:08:26.885
<v Speaker 5>He needs a bit of help to swing over to

1:08:26.925 --> 1:08:29.525
<v Speaker 5>Oscorp to save the day, and wouldn't you know it,

1:08:29.885 --> 1:08:35.525
<v Speaker 5>the cranes reconstructing the city all start slowly turning inward,

1:08:35.925 --> 1:08:39.085
<v Speaker 5>giving our guys something to swing from. Cue the waterworks

1:08:39.125 --> 1:08:43.445
<v Speaker 5>for me. Every damn time superhero movies are so bound

1:08:43.565 --> 1:08:45.285
<v Speaker 5>up with the post nine to eleven moment, But this

1:08:45.445 --> 1:08:50.245
<v Speaker 5>scene really beautifully articulates the United we stand eCos instead

1:08:50.245 --> 1:08:53.925
<v Speaker 5>of just restaging the attacks themselves as movies like Batman

1:08:54.005 --> 1:08:57.285
<v Speaker 5>Begins or The Avengers or A Man of Steel would do. Anyway,

1:08:57.645 --> 1:08:59.285
<v Speaker 5>I can't wait to hear your picks.

1:08:59.645 --> 1:09:03.245
<v Speaker 4>Thanks guys, there it is Andrew Garfield, Mark Webb. Spider

1:09:03.325 --> 1:09:05.885
<v Speaker 4>Man's They're not going to come up in any of

1:09:06.005 --> 1:09:09.285
<v Speaker 4>our top two picks, but Drew did get that choice

1:09:09.365 --> 1:09:12.805
<v Speaker 4>in and I don't think you can argue with his credentials.

1:09:12.845 --> 1:09:15.205
<v Speaker 4>I think he makes a compelling choice there. And I

1:09:15.245 --> 1:09:17.485
<v Speaker 4>said it earlier, Josh that even the bad ones, and

1:09:17.565 --> 1:09:20.445
<v Speaker 4>I don't think the Amazing Spider Man the first one

1:09:20.525 --> 1:09:24.725
<v Speaker 4>is necess sssarily one of the bad ones. It may

1:09:24.805 --> 1:09:26.845
<v Speaker 4>not be one of the better ones, but it's not

1:09:26.965 --> 1:09:29.325
<v Speaker 4>a it's not a terrible movie. But it has a

1:09:29.485 --> 1:09:32.285
<v Speaker 4>moment like that, And Drew is right, it has a

1:09:32.445 --> 1:09:35.564
<v Speaker 4>moment like that, a nice visual moment like that where

1:09:35.605 --> 1:09:40.005
<v Speaker 4>those cranes come together and you go, oh, a Spider

1:09:40.085 --> 1:09:42.684
<v Speaker 4>Man movie can give me a nice a nice touch

1:09:43.525 --> 1:09:45.685
<v Speaker 4>like that with that character. And it speaks to what

1:09:45.805 --> 1:09:49.485
<v Speaker 4>you said earlier, that intimate connection between Spider Man and

1:09:49.605 --> 1:09:51.125
<v Speaker 4>the citizenry of New York.

1:09:51.645 --> 1:09:54.325
<v Speaker 1>Well, thank you for the voicemail, Drew, but where's the photo?

1:09:54.685 --> 1:09:57.565
<v Speaker 1>I mean, I'm not saying I don't believe you, but

1:09:58.205 --> 1:10:01.365
<v Speaker 1>when we did our top five tattoos tattoos we would

1:10:01.405 --> 1:10:04.885
<v Speaker 1>get we were flooded with braver souls who have guts

1:10:04.965 --> 1:10:08.085
<v Speaker 1>their movie tattoo tattoos. They would send pictures.

1:10:08.165 --> 1:10:09.685
<v Speaker 4>So it's coming now.

1:10:10.125 --> 1:10:13.165
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, yeah, let's uh talk about something for the film

1:10:13.205 --> 1:10:15.605
<v Speaker 1>Spotting Family Discord can't wait to see it.

1:10:15.765 --> 1:10:18.885
<v Speaker 4>I like it. Thank you address, Yeah, you know the

1:10:18.965 --> 1:10:22.925
<v Speaker 4>email address. We do a cpreciate the feedback. Let's get

1:10:22.965 --> 1:10:26.644
<v Speaker 4>to our final two choices, Josh, your number two Spider

1:10:26.725 --> 1:10:27.365
<v Speaker 4>Man scene.

1:10:28.085 --> 1:10:30.604
<v Speaker 1>Let's get back to praise for two thousand and two's

1:10:31.125 --> 1:10:35.485
<v Speaker 1>Spider Man and it's the upside Down kiss. When I

1:10:36.005 --> 1:10:39.525
<v Speaker 1>started rewatching and researching this pick at him because I

1:10:39.565 --> 1:10:41.485
<v Speaker 1>knew it was going to be on my list, I

1:10:41.645 --> 1:10:44.965
<v Speaker 1>really expected to find out that the scene, or at

1:10:45.045 --> 1:10:47.325
<v Speaker 1>least the image at least this image was pulled from

1:10:47.485 --> 1:10:50.365
<v Speaker 1>a comic book run at one point that I wasn't

1:10:50.925 --> 1:10:55.045
<v Speaker 1>aware of, but apparently not. What I did find was

1:10:55.405 --> 1:10:59.325
<v Speaker 1>a twenty twenty two Ringer article that was a deep

1:10:59.485 --> 1:11:03.765
<v Speaker 1>dive just on this scene, written by Jake kring Shriefels,

1:11:04.365 --> 1:11:07.445
<v Speaker 1>and in there they talk. He talks a little bit

1:11:07.525 --> 1:11:10.085
<v Speaker 1>about how the scene came about, doesn't mention that it

1:11:10.125 --> 1:11:13.325
<v Speaker 1>appeared in the comics, a comic run earlier. Maybe a

1:11:13.445 --> 1:11:16.325
<v Speaker 1>listener might know of something similar that they can share.

1:11:17.125 --> 1:11:19.085
<v Speaker 1>We'll link to this as well if you want all

1:11:19.165 --> 1:11:22.005
<v Speaker 1>the details on this deep dive. But basically, the moment

1:11:22.085 --> 1:11:26.925
<v Speaker 1>arose after director Sam Raimi scrap plans to film a

1:11:27.005 --> 1:11:31.005
<v Speaker 1>fairly standard kiss a top Rockefeller Center, and so they

1:11:31.045 --> 1:11:34.325
<v Speaker 1>were looking for another option, and second unit director and

1:11:34.365 --> 1:11:39.325
<v Speaker 1>storyboard artist Doug Leffler thought about some earlier jobs he'd

1:11:39.365 --> 1:11:42.325
<v Speaker 1>been on. Earlier work he had done that featured characters

1:11:42.445 --> 1:11:46.485
<v Speaker 1>falling into the frame, and so that was in his

1:11:46.605 --> 1:11:49.764
<v Speaker 1>mind and he started sketching out possibilities, and he sketched

1:11:49.765 --> 1:11:51.765
<v Speaker 1>out the basics for this scene. So this is Toby

1:11:51.845 --> 1:11:56.005
<v Speaker 1>Maguire's Peter lowering himself next to Kristen Dunns Mary Jane

1:11:56.125 --> 1:11:57.925
<v Speaker 1>in this rainy alley.

1:11:58.405 --> 1:12:00.085
<v Speaker 2>You have a knack for getting in trouble.

1:12:00.925 --> 1:12:02.525
<v Speaker 3>You have a knack for saving my life.

1:12:03.405 --> 1:12:06.005
<v Speaker 1>I think I had a superhero stocker. I was in

1:12:06.085 --> 1:12:10.845
<v Speaker 1>the neighborhood and I can't really say much better why

1:12:10.925 --> 1:12:15.005
<v Speaker 1>this works than what kring Shreefels does in this article.

1:12:15.045 --> 1:12:16.485
<v Speaker 1>So let me quote here. If this is in the

1:12:16.605 --> 1:12:19.605
<v Speaker 1>Ringer within the context of the story, the scene is

1:12:19.645 --> 1:12:23.045
<v Speaker 1>a cathartic release for Peter Parker, a rare opportunity to

1:12:23.165 --> 1:12:26.085
<v Speaker 1>embrace his dual identity and be vulnerable with the girl

1:12:26.205 --> 1:12:28.845
<v Speaker 1>he loves. On a much larger scale, It's one of

1:12:28.885 --> 1:12:32.205
<v Speaker 1>the most iconic and romantic kisses in Hollywood history. A

1:12:32.365 --> 1:12:37.285
<v Speaker 1>unique and asymmetrical composition of rain soaked interlocked lips, never

1:12:37.565 --> 1:12:41.685
<v Speaker 1>seen before on the big screen. So I have this

1:12:41.765 --> 1:12:44.764
<v Speaker 1>at number two. I do think this is another element

1:12:44.805 --> 1:12:49.885
<v Speaker 1>of the character, is the romantic nature. And the only

1:12:49.965 --> 1:12:53.205
<v Speaker 1>thing I'll say about Brand New Day is that is

1:12:53.285 --> 1:12:56.445
<v Speaker 1>definitely explored. If this is something you love about the

1:12:56.485 --> 1:13:00.085
<v Speaker 1>Spider Man and Peter Parker character, that is definitely explored

1:13:00.085 --> 1:13:01.725
<v Speaker 1>in the new movie in Brand New Day. What that

1:13:01.925 --> 1:13:05.885
<v Speaker 1>means for this iteration of the character. But here, yeah,

1:13:06.045 --> 1:13:10.365
<v Speaker 1>it is the composition and what it means in terms

1:13:10.405 --> 1:13:13.205
<v Speaker 1>of character. And you have when you think of this

1:13:13.365 --> 1:13:17.925
<v Speaker 1>in terms of all the versions of Spider Man, it

1:13:18.045 --> 1:13:20.045
<v Speaker 1>is such a unique I mean, this idea of a

1:13:20.125 --> 1:13:23.925
<v Speaker 1>Spider Man and so many unique visual possibilities. It would

1:13:24.005 --> 1:13:27.485
<v Speaker 1>be easy to just stop there and say the things

1:13:27.565 --> 1:13:29.525
<v Speaker 1>we started with as kids, like wouldn't it be cool

1:13:29.525 --> 1:13:31.725
<v Speaker 1>to see him swinging across the screen? We got it,

1:13:32.085 --> 1:13:36.125
<v Speaker 1>We're good. But to take that next step and imagine

1:13:36.165 --> 1:13:42.205
<v Speaker 1>ways for those visual possibilities to echo thematic ideas, to

1:13:42.365 --> 1:13:48.365
<v Speaker 1>echo emotional beats, to capture character qualities. That's when you're

1:13:48.405 --> 1:13:52.685
<v Speaker 1>really working at a higher level of artistry, and in

1:13:52.765 --> 1:13:55.725
<v Speaker 1>a single shot, really, I mean, there's a lot going

1:13:55.805 --> 1:13:58.205
<v Speaker 1>on here that goes into this. I think Kirsten Duntz

1:13:58.285 --> 1:14:01.165
<v Speaker 1>makes this a pretty sexy scene in the way she

1:14:01.285 --> 1:14:05.245
<v Speaker 1>plays it actually, so the actors are definitely involved in

1:14:05.325 --> 1:14:08.645
<v Speaker 1>making this work, but just in a single shot in

1:14:08.725 --> 1:14:12.965
<v Speaker 1>the framing, to be able to invest it, infuse it

1:14:13.125 --> 1:14:17.725
<v Speaker 1>with so much emotion and thematic purpose for me, makes it,

1:14:18.285 --> 1:14:20.005
<v Speaker 1>you know, could easily be the number one for a

1:14:20.045 --> 1:14:23.445
<v Speaker 1>lot of people, probably their number one Spider Man Scener moment.

1:14:24.165 --> 1:14:25.165
<v Speaker 1>I have it here at number two.

1:14:25.885 --> 1:14:27.925
<v Speaker 4>Yeah, tough not to put on my list. It's an

1:14:27.925 --> 1:14:30.765
<v Speaker 4>honorable mention, It's what I was trying to say. Or

1:14:30.885 --> 1:14:34.085
<v Speaker 4>we'll go back to with your number five. I believe

1:14:34.125 --> 1:14:36.805
<v Speaker 4>the stopping the train moment there are some moments, there

1:14:36.805 --> 1:14:41.325
<v Speaker 4>are reasons why you consider them Mount Rushmore type moments.

1:14:41.405 --> 1:14:43.564
<v Speaker 4>They belong on that list. And from the Train, Josh,

1:14:43.605 --> 1:14:46.085
<v Speaker 4>it's not just them them holding him, but even when

1:14:46.125 --> 1:14:49.205
<v Speaker 4>he when he faints in their their hands right, hold him,

1:14:49.485 --> 1:14:54.485
<v Speaker 4>hold him up. And and here that that image is

1:14:54.685 --> 1:14:58.005
<v Speaker 4>so vivid, and and I understand why the Ringer has

1:14:58.365 --> 1:15:00.485
<v Speaker 4>devoted an entire article to it. I think for a

1:15:00.565 --> 1:15:03.805
<v Speaker 4>lot of people, You're right, it probably is the number

1:15:03.885 --> 1:15:09.485
<v Speaker 4>one scene that said everything you just articulated about it

1:15:10.005 --> 1:15:15.525
<v Speaker 4>in terms of composition being so important and taking the

1:15:15.725 --> 1:15:24.684
<v Speaker 4>unique visual possibilities of a spider Cara so perfectly. Even better,

1:15:24.805 --> 1:15:29.605
<v Speaker 4>I think applies to my number two. It's like the

1:15:29.725 --> 1:15:34.165
<v Speaker 4>filmmakers here in Spider Man Across the Spider Verse said

1:15:34.845 --> 1:15:39.005
<v Speaker 4>let's take that moment, and maybe they did, Josh, because

1:15:39.005 --> 1:15:43.365
<v Speaker 4>it also involves characters who are upside down. They took

1:15:43.485 --> 1:15:47.205
<v Speaker 4>that moment and said, how can we extend this even more?

1:15:47.565 --> 1:15:55.685
<v Speaker 4>Extend the emotional and thematic possibilities of that imagery. And

1:15:56.845 --> 1:15:59.205
<v Speaker 4>when you think about these films, so the moment is

1:15:59.685 --> 1:16:02.965
<v Speaker 4>Miles and Gwen at the Williamsburg clock Tower in Across

1:16:03.005 --> 1:16:07.125
<v Speaker 4>the Spider Verse. In both of the films. There's plenty

1:16:07.165 --> 1:16:13.285
<v Speaker 4>of examples of impressive animation, thrilling imagery, great action moments,

1:16:13.565 --> 1:16:18.045
<v Speaker 4>but also just great compositions where you recognize the artists

1:16:18.085 --> 1:16:21.564
<v Speaker 4>responsible for these films are elevating the craft and as

1:16:21.605 --> 1:16:24.445
<v Speaker 4>you said earlier talking about the poll questions, that maybe

1:16:24.485 --> 1:16:27.565
<v Speaker 4>in some ways these are even just better films. But

1:16:27.805 --> 1:16:34.485
<v Speaker 4>for me, the single scene that best harnesses those capabilities

1:16:34.725 --> 1:16:39.765
<v Speaker 4>is this scene. It's a reunion scene. It's been I

1:16:39.805 --> 1:16:41.925
<v Speaker 4>think like a year and a half since these two

1:16:42.045 --> 1:16:46.725
<v Speaker 4>characters last saw each other, so they're catching up, they're

1:16:46.805 --> 1:16:49.564
<v Speaker 4>feeling each other out, but they also know each other

1:16:49.725 --> 1:16:52.005
<v Speaker 4>so well. They know each other in a way like

1:16:52.245 --> 1:16:55.165
<v Speaker 4>great friends do, and people who are connected the way

1:16:55.205 --> 1:16:58.845
<v Speaker 4>they are, they know each other uniquely. There's also that

1:16:58.965 --> 1:17:02.485
<v Speaker 4>other dynamic at play where Miles has a crush on Gwen.

1:17:03.405 --> 1:17:07.604
<v Speaker 4>Daniel Pemberton's score is so lovely. During this sequence, they're

1:17:07.805 --> 1:17:11.405
<v Speaker 4>high above the city. They're in this fantasy sort of realm,

1:17:11.845 --> 1:17:15.245
<v Speaker 4>and everything about it captures the way you feel when

1:17:15.285 --> 1:17:18.765
<v Speaker 4>you're seeing someone special to you who you haven't seen

1:17:18.845 --> 1:17:22.965
<v Speaker 4>in a long time. And the director justsic Kay Thompson,

1:17:23.245 --> 1:17:25.844
<v Speaker 4>he seems to want to keep it grounded in character.

1:17:26.525 --> 1:17:30.685
<v Speaker 4>It's not about showing off with the animation, but it

1:17:30.845 --> 1:17:36.445
<v Speaker 4>is about trying to heighten that that sensation, this fantasy

1:17:36.525 --> 1:17:40.924
<v Speaker 4>sort of feeling, this special feeling that these two characters

1:17:41.045 --> 1:17:44.885
<v Speaker 4>have when they're together. And the first time we see them,

1:17:46.285 --> 1:17:48.965
<v Speaker 4>it is kind of subtle, right because they're they're vertical

1:17:49.005 --> 1:17:51.205
<v Speaker 4>in the frame. The first time we see them together,

1:17:51.525 --> 1:17:55.205
<v Speaker 4>it feels like a normal shot. So you and your

1:17:55.285 --> 1:17:58.844
<v Speaker 4>dead it's a little off because the horizon is also vertical,

1:17:58.925 --> 1:18:02.165
<v Speaker 4>and we're not used to seeing horizons be vertical, and

1:18:02.445 --> 1:18:04.604
<v Speaker 4>we can kind of start to put together that, oh,

1:18:04.725 --> 1:18:08.205
<v Speaker 4>they must be walking sideways in a way that only

1:18:08.405 --> 1:18:12.245
<v Speaker 4>characters like they could do. And then when Gwen starts

1:18:12.325 --> 1:18:17.005
<v Speaker 4>walking backwards along the dome and we with the camera

1:18:17.365 --> 1:18:21.285
<v Speaker 4>follow her, almost like we're on a roller coaster, but

1:18:21.405 --> 1:18:24.925
<v Speaker 4>a gentle roller coaster that's going over the edge with her.

1:18:25.645 --> 1:18:28.005
<v Speaker 4>It's one of those kind of take your breath away moments,

1:18:28.045 --> 1:18:31.445
<v Speaker 4>but not again, not in a roller coaster drop. Take

1:18:31.485 --> 1:18:34.405
<v Speaker 4>your breath away just kind of eases you into it.

1:18:35.005 --> 1:18:38.564
<v Speaker 4>It's it's really something. And then there's that incredible one

1:18:38.685 --> 1:18:42.925
<v Speaker 4>hundred and eighty degree move that that follows her as

1:18:43.005 --> 1:18:45.725
<v Speaker 4>she moves to the underside of the ledge and she's

1:18:45.765 --> 1:18:49.205
<v Speaker 4>standing upside down, and I honestly just love the tilt up.

1:18:49.285 --> 1:18:51.724
<v Speaker 4>Then that we get where Miles is standing on top

1:18:52.125 --> 1:18:55.965
<v Speaker 4>and she's sitting up upside down, and it's still keeping

1:18:56.085 --> 1:18:59.485
<v Speaker 4>some distance between them, because I think it's still about

1:19:00.125 --> 1:19:01.925
<v Speaker 4>he is still trying to figure out how to kind

1:19:01.965 --> 1:19:06.845
<v Speaker 4>of move into her space and how to fully reconnect

1:19:06.925 --> 1:19:09.365
<v Speaker 4>with each other. So there's still some distance between them.

1:19:09.445 --> 1:19:11.645
<v Speaker 4>But then he does move closer and he joins her,

1:19:12.205 --> 1:19:15.245
<v Speaker 4>and they spend the next the next few minutes together

1:19:15.565 --> 1:19:17.564
<v Speaker 4>talking while sitting upside down.

1:19:18.725 --> 1:19:22.925
<v Speaker 2>Just a really emotionally intelligent guy beyond my years.

1:19:25.685 --> 1:19:29.445
<v Speaker 4>Some of the lines of dialogue in that scene while

1:19:29.445 --> 1:19:31.885
<v Speaker 4>they're sitting there or just about to sit there together,

1:19:32.365 --> 1:19:37.725
<v Speaker 4>I think, really explain the motivation for the sequence and

1:19:37.765 --> 1:19:42.285
<v Speaker 4>the way it's portrayed. At one point, Miles says, well,

1:19:42.325 --> 1:19:44.645
<v Speaker 4>maybe some things are supposed to be just for us,

1:19:45.245 --> 1:19:47.925
<v Speaker 4>and she says, how many people could you talk to

1:19:48.085 --> 1:19:50.845
<v Speaker 4>about this stuff? Speaking to again that special connection, how

1:19:50.885 --> 1:19:55.885
<v Speaker 4>they are Obviously they're different, and there aren't there aren't

1:19:55.925 --> 1:19:59.365
<v Speaker 4>a lot of people who have their special skills and

1:19:59.685 --> 1:20:05.525
<v Speaker 4>they need each other and if they are, then these

1:20:05.605 --> 1:20:09.325
<v Speaker 4>types of figures who are going to have an experience

1:20:09.605 --> 1:20:13.125
<v Speaker 4>that are just the experience is just for them, and

1:20:13.725 --> 1:20:16.165
<v Speaker 4>they're going to talk about things that only they can

1:20:16.205 --> 1:20:18.565
<v Speaker 4>talk about. Well, it makes sense that they would do

1:20:18.685 --> 1:20:21.644
<v Speaker 4>it in an environment, in in a way that only

1:20:21.805 --> 1:20:25.605
<v Speaker 4>they can do, that only they can have, in a

1:20:25.725 --> 1:20:28.965
<v Speaker 4>moment that only they can share, which is them high

1:20:29.005 --> 1:20:33.884
<v Speaker 4>above the city sitting upside down. So the whole sequence

1:20:33.925 --> 1:20:37.525
<v Speaker 4>for me evokes that that they're having together, this singular

1:20:38.085 --> 1:20:41.365
<v Speaker 4>experience that is just for them, and then because of that,

1:20:41.565 --> 1:20:45.565
<v Speaker 4>we as viewers, it almost feels like a privilege that

1:20:45.645 --> 1:20:47.405
<v Speaker 4>we get to be a part of it. It feels

1:20:47.525 --> 1:20:50.724
<v Speaker 4>that intimate that we get to sit there and listen

1:20:50.805 --> 1:20:53.525
<v Speaker 4>in on the conversation that they get to have. I

1:20:53.565 --> 1:20:57.845
<v Speaker 4>did find a place, Josh where the production designer said,

1:20:58.125 --> 1:21:00.724
<v Speaker 4>and I should find his full name. His last name's O'Keefe.

1:21:00.965 --> 1:21:04.085
<v Speaker 4>But he talks about the artist Peter Chan, who did

1:21:04.125 --> 1:21:07.165
<v Speaker 4>the majority of work on the sequence. He says, he

1:21:07.245 --> 1:21:09.445
<v Speaker 4>did such a fantastic job. Peters an artist that we

1:21:09.525 --> 1:21:12.605
<v Speaker 4>traditionally use for the most colorful scenes possible because he

1:21:12.685 --> 1:21:14.925
<v Speaker 4>has this ability to handle a wide variety of colors

1:21:14.965 --> 1:21:17.285
<v Speaker 4>for the scene, however, I challenged him to work with

1:21:17.405 --> 1:21:20.045
<v Speaker 4>a more limited palette and pay very close attention to

1:21:20.165 --> 1:21:23.245
<v Speaker 4>the sensitivity of the sequence. There are lots and lots

1:21:23.285 --> 1:21:26.285
<v Speaker 4>of very subtle but huge shifts happening here. The city

1:21:26.405 --> 1:21:29.764
<v Speaker 4>never feels too flat or boring. Although it feels magical

1:21:29.805 --> 1:21:33.045
<v Speaker 4>and romantic, it's not telling you directly. The visuals are

1:21:33.125 --> 1:21:36.845
<v Speaker 4>letting you feel the romanticism of the moment quietly, and

1:21:36.965 --> 1:21:41.125
<v Speaker 4>I think that I think that does get to part

1:21:41.165 --> 1:21:45.605
<v Speaker 4>of why that scene works. Again, for all of its showiness,

1:21:45.685 --> 1:21:47.365
<v Speaker 4>in some way, if you think about the way the

1:21:47.485 --> 1:21:51.405
<v Speaker 4>camera is following the characters and that upside down things

1:21:51.405 --> 1:21:54.605
<v Speaker 4>are happening, it is so quiet at the end of

1:21:54.605 --> 1:21:57.125
<v Speaker 4>the day, it is still such a quiet, beautiful scene.

1:21:58.165 --> 1:22:01.804
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, there is a real sunset seeping through the cloud

1:22:01.925 --> 1:22:05.125
<v Speaker 1>sense of the color here that that quote brings to mind.

1:22:05.125 --> 1:22:08.564
<v Speaker 1>If listeners have not seen this scene, you really got

1:22:08.685 --> 1:22:10.725
<v Speaker 1>to check it out. We'll link to it in our

1:22:10.765 --> 1:22:12.805
<v Speaker 1>show notes, as we will for I think all the

1:22:12.845 --> 1:22:16.245
<v Speaker 1>scenes for our picks, because it's kind of hard to describe, right,

1:22:17.925 --> 1:22:19.925
<v Speaker 1>but for all the reasons you laid out, and a

1:22:20.005 --> 1:22:22.325
<v Speaker 1>few more are get to this is why I have

1:22:22.925 --> 1:22:25.805
<v Speaker 1>being Upside Down with Spider Gwen as my number one.

1:22:25.925 --> 1:22:29.485
<v Speaker 1>I have it ahead of the Kiss. It's just mesmerizing

1:22:29.685 --> 1:22:34.405
<v Speaker 1>and moving. Astute listeners will also remember I had it

1:22:34.485 --> 1:22:37.085
<v Speaker 1>actually as my most moving moment at our twenty twenty

1:22:37.125 --> 1:22:39.965
<v Speaker 1>three rap party, and so obviously it was going to

1:22:40.005 --> 1:22:41.405
<v Speaker 1>be on this list. It was just a matter of

1:22:41.445 --> 1:22:44.885
<v Speaker 1>where do I rank it with the others, and once

1:22:44.965 --> 1:22:47.805
<v Speaker 1>I watched all of them again, I had to put

1:22:47.845 --> 1:22:49.765
<v Speaker 1>it at the top. I do think to your point

1:22:49.805 --> 1:22:54.684
<v Speaker 1>about the dialogue SHIMIEK Moore as Miles Here and Hailey

1:22:54.725 --> 1:22:58.085
<v Speaker 1>Steinfeld as Spider Gwen, I do think they're giving really

1:22:58.125 --> 1:23:02.245
<v Speaker 1>good performances, and the character animation with him moving his

1:23:02.365 --> 1:23:05.645
<v Speaker 1>hands slightly towards her is just so astute. So in

1:23:05.765 --> 1:23:08.205
<v Speaker 1>terms of performance, it's wonderful, But it really is a

1:23:08.245 --> 1:23:11.245
<v Speaker 1>lot of what you were talking about, the visuals accentuating

1:23:11.325 --> 1:23:14.325
<v Speaker 1>those emotions. I even like. I think the only thing

1:23:14.365 --> 1:23:16.644
<v Speaker 1>I'll mention that you didn't I don't think you mentioned

1:23:16.725 --> 1:23:20.285
<v Speaker 1>Gwen's ponytail. How she puts her hair in a ponytail

1:23:20.325 --> 1:23:23.884
<v Speaker 1>at the start, but then when the whole screen flips,

1:23:25.485 --> 1:23:30.685
<v Speaker 1>essentially she looks like she's sitting upright, but her ponytail

1:23:31.245 --> 1:23:33.845
<v Speaker 1>is poking way up in the air because of gravity, right.

1:23:33.925 --> 1:23:38.005
<v Speaker 1>So it's just it's clever. It's also orientating for us

1:23:38.205 --> 1:23:41.884
<v Speaker 1>as the audience is It's like, it's okay, it's functional,

1:23:41.965 --> 1:23:44.965
<v Speaker 1>but also like really kind of funny and cute. And

1:23:45.085 --> 1:23:47.365
<v Speaker 1>then and then to have the skyline in the background

1:23:47.805 --> 1:23:50.965
<v Speaker 1>be upside down with that happening, it's like, Okay, I

1:23:51.725 --> 1:23:54.845
<v Speaker 1>I really I what's happening here? But okay, I think

1:23:54.885 --> 1:23:57.565
<v Speaker 1>I know what's happening here, and your brain is is

1:23:57.725 --> 1:24:02.405
<v Speaker 1>registering all that and it does, you know, it's dizzying

1:24:02.405 --> 1:24:04.805
<v Speaker 1>and oddly beautiful, but it does speak to what you're

1:24:04.845 --> 1:24:09.005
<v Speaker 1>talking about their unique experiences. These are two teens whose

1:24:09.085 --> 1:24:14.405
<v Speaker 1>worlds have been completely upended literally and you know, thematically

1:24:14.645 --> 1:24:17.604
<v Speaker 1>turned upside down, and this is what they're talking about here,

1:24:17.725 --> 1:24:21.325
<v Speaker 1>the stresses, the pressures of these having these power and

1:24:21.405 --> 1:24:24.805
<v Speaker 1>what it means for their family relationships and their personal relationships,

1:24:25.925 --> 1:24:32.325
<v Speaker 1>and to yeah, to have that represented by the imagery alone,

1:24:32.405 --> 1:24:36.564
<v Speaker 1>I really, you know, I didn't think the movies could

1:24:36.685 --> 1:24:39.085
<v Speaker 1>find a way to top the comic book cool and

1:24:39.205 --> 1:24:43.245
<v Speaker 1>emotionality of The Upside Down Kiss, But I think this.

1:24:43.605 --> 1:24:46.445
<v Speaker 1>I think this scene from across the Spider Verse manages it.

1:24:46.685 --> 1:24:48.525
<v Speaker 1>So yeah, number one for me.

1:24:50.885 --> 1:24:56.005
<v Speaker 4>I guess I'm proving here why I did pick Spider

1:24:56.085 --> 1:24:59.644
<v Speaker 4>Man two thousand and two though as my definitive Spider

1:24:59.725 --> 1:25:02.125
<v Speaker 4>Man in the poll question, because when it came down

1:25:02.285 --> 1:25:05.724
<v Speaker 4>to going with a number one scene, I did resort

1:25:05.885 --> 1:25:09.205
<v Speaker 4>back to Sam Raimi's two thousand and two Spider Man

1:25:09.925 --> 1:25:16.805
<v Speaker 4>and I went with Peter discovering his powers. And I

1:25:16.885 --> 1:25:19.684
<v Speaker 4>do think there's a lot here, Josh in the scene

1:25:20.325 --> 1:25:24.845
<v Speaker 4>that it reflects here again Sam Raimi's sensibilities as a

1:25:24.925 --> 1:25:28.205
<v Speaker 4>director and how he applies them to this character. Why

1:25:28.285 --> 1:25:31.965
<v Speaker 4>these movies work so well, Starting with Peter looking down

1:25:32.005 --> 1:25:34.765
<v Speaker 4>at his hand and that extreme close up of his

1:25:34.925 --> 1:25:41.644
<v Speaker 4>fingertips with the microscopic hairs, it literally makes his superpowers tactile,

1:25:42.365 --> 1:25:45.245
<v Speaker 4>which is something we complain about, is these superhero movies

1:25:45.325 --> 1:25:49.764
<v Speaker 4>not feeling that way, not feeling real, not feeling tangible.

1:25:50.565 --> 1:25:52.445
<v Speaker 4>Here's where I said I was going to maybe mention

1:25:53.605 --> 1:25:56.005
<v Speaker 4>the Amazing Spider Man two again, the movie I needed

1:25:56.045 --> 1:26:00.165
<v Speaker 4>to catch up with, and I watched it as my

1:26:00.325 --> 1:26:02.885
<v Speaker 4>last film so I could cross off all these Spider

1:26:02.965 --> 1:26:08.205
<v Speaker 4>Man movies it's definitely the worst of all of them.

1:26:08.725 --> 1:26:11.805
<v Speaker 4>I would say, without revisiting all of them, I would

1:26:11.805 --> 1:26:14.845
<v Speaker 4>say it's the worst of them. And I bring it

1:26:14.925 --> 1:26:19.645
<v Speaker 4>up in this context, Josh, because with my respects to

1:26:19.765 --> 1:26:23.325
<v Speaker 4>our listener Drew, who said is that these movies on

1:26:23.445 --> 1:26:26.725
<v Speaker 4>the whole work and that he really likes Gwen and

1:26:28.165 --> 1:26:32.005
<v Speaker 4>Peter as Emma Stone and Andrew Garfield portray them. I

1:26:32.045 --> 1:26:33.845
<v Speaker 4>don't really have a problem with them, but I did

1:26:33.925 --> 1:26:37.325
<v Speaker 4>spend most of the movie making that face. Dennis Leary

1:26:37.445 --> 1:26:39.925
<v Speaker 4>makes the whole movie when he appears as the ghost

1:26:40.005 --> 1:26:43.325
<v Speaker 4>of Policemen Past, who just appears every now and again

1:26:43.845 --> 1:26:45.365
<v Speaker 4>with that scolding face.

1:26:45.445 --> 1:26:46.685
<v Speaker 1>Where he just got about him.

1:26:47.085 --> 1:26:50.765
<v Speaker 4>He just appears and scowls at I hope he got

1:26:50.845 --> 1:26:53.525
<v Speaker 4>paid well to do that, like for just one day

1:26:53.565 --> 1:26:55.724
<v Speaker 4>of work, just stand in front of a green screen

1:26:55.805 --> 1:26:58.165
<v Speaker 4>or whatever and scowl at Tom Holland or nobody. He

1:26:58.285 --> 1:27:00.485
<v Speaker 4>was probably scowling it or not Tom Holland Andrew Garfield,

1:27:00.525 --> 1:27:02.764
<v Speaker 4>he probably was scowling at nobody. I do hope Dennis

1:27:02.805 --> 1:27:05.405
<v Speaker 4>Leary got paid well for that day. That's how I

1:27:05.525 --> 1:27:09.965
<v Speaker 4>felt mostly disappointed watching this movie. And my biggest disappointment

1:27:10.285 --> 1:27:15.325
<v Speaker 4>was maybe that at no point did I feel not

1:27:15.525 --> 1:27:17.725
<v Speaker 4>just during the set pieces, the major set pieces, but

1:27:17.885 --> 1:27:21.725
<v Speaker 4>during any single moment of Spider Man being Spider Man.

1:27:22.845 --> 1:27:25.485
<v Speaker 4>At no point did I feel like I believed it.

1:27:26.245 --> 1:27:31.165
<v Speaker 4>At every turn, the effects jolted me out of my

1:27:31.285 --> 1:27:35.405
<v Speaker 4>suspension of disbelief. It felt like they had to apply

1:27:35.645 --> 1:27:41.644
<v Speaker 4>some kind of computer, computerized moment, computer generated effect at

1:27:41.765 --> 1:27:47.165
<v Speaker 4>every single leap or wall climb, whatever it was, and

1:27:47.285 --> 1:27:50.445
<v Speaker 4>it took me out of it at every turn. And

1:27:51.205 --> 1:27:55.525
<v Speaker 4>here Rainy is signaling to you, these hands are about

1:27:55.565 --> 1:27:58.325
<v Speaker 4>to walk up the wall and you're gonna watch it. Yeah,

1:27:58.405 --> 1:28:01.925
<v Speaker 4>it's gonna be great. This is a fun sequence. It's

1:28:01.965 --> 1:28:05.125
<v Speaker 4>a funny sequence, but I think it's so memorable in

1:28:05.245 --> 1:28:08.645
<v Speaker 4>part two because of the layers that Raymie brings to it.

1:28:09.085 --> 1:28:11.965
<v Speaker 4>You don't need a PhD in child psychology to read

1:28:12.005 --> 1:28:17.685
<v Speaker 4>Spider Man as a metaphor for puberty and adolescents with

1:28:18.245 --> 1:28:22.325
<v Speaker 4>sudden physical transformations and the way that can be scary

1:28:22.605 --> 1:28:27.325
<v Speaker 4>for young boys. And not surprisingly with Rainy, this sequence

1:28:27.365 --> 1:28:30.925
<v Speaker 4>starts with some ominousness. It's in this dark kind of

1:28:30.965 --> 1:28:33.845
<v Speaker 4>alley out of the sun, and he looks up and

1:28:33.885 --> 1:28:37.005
<v Speaker 4>sees the Spider in the web crawling around and there's

1:28:37.085 --> 1:28:39.405
<v Speaker 4>barbed wire right next to it, and the Danny Elfman

1:28:39.525 --> 1:28:42.445
<v Speaker 4>score even heightens that a little bit. And then when

1:28:42.525 --> 1:28:49.684
<v Speaker 4>Peter initially starts crawling up the wall slowly, it doesn't

1:28:49.765 --> 1:28:52.845
<v Speaker 4>feel like this joyous thing. It actually feels like something

1:28:52.885 --> 1:28:56.045
<v Speaker 4>out of a horror movie where a scary monster starts

1:28:56.125 --> 1:28:59.564
<v Speaker 4>crawling slowly toward the main character and then picks up speed.

1:29:00.005 --> 1:29:02.165
<v Speaker 4>But then once he fully realizes what he can do,

1:29:03.005 --> 1:29:11.005
<v Speaker 4>that's where the excitement begins. And I suppose watching that sequence, Josh,

1:29:11.445 --> 1:29:14.085
<v Speaker 4>the only part for me watching it again multiple times

1:29:14.125 --> 1:29:17.125
<v Speaker 4>you could be really nitpicky about is how real a

1:29:17.245 --> 1:29:20.605
<v Speaker 4>couple of those jumps felt from the aerial shots. But

1:29:20.685 --> 1:29:27.045
<v Speaker 4>otherwise I bought every single amazing move Peter pulls off. There.

1:29:27.485 --> 1:29:31.285
<v Speaker 4>It completely holds up, and the webs and the webs

1:29:31.365 --> 1:29:34.645
<v Speaker 4>slinging feel real and don't feel like any kind of

1:29:34.805 --> 1:29:39.925
<v Speaker 4>computer generated effect. He's a kid, acting like a kid

1:29:40.245 --> 1:29:43.564
<v Speaker 4>like you believe a kid would act, discovering these powers

1:29:43.965 --> 1:29:46.085
<v Speaker 4>and going back to where we began. Every single one

1:29:46.165 --> 1:29:50.884
<v Speaker 4>of us who aspired to be Spider Man, who dreamed

1:29:50.925 --> 1:29:55.685
<v Speaker 4>about this moment, suddenly actually getting bitten by the radioactive

1:29:55.725 --> 1:29:58.165
<v Speaker 4>Spider that when we put on our under roofs and thought,

1:29:58.205 --> 1:30:01.005
<v Speaker 4>if only I could actually sling webs and crawl up

1:30:01.045 --> 1:30:06.005
<v Speaker 4>the walls. In this moment, Raymie brought that to life

1:30:06.045 --> 1:30:09.685
<v Speaker 4>for us. He delivered the confusion but also the exhilaration

1:30:10.125 --> 1:30:14.644
<v Speaker 4>that we imagined when we were kids, and I suppose

1:30:14.765 --> 1:30:17.005
<v Speaker 4>that is a big part of why it will always

1:30:17.045 --> 1:30:19.885
<v Speaker 4>be this movie. That scene in particular, that's a big

1:30:19.965 --> 1:30:21.765
<v Speaker 4>reason why this will be the diff of Spider Man

1:30:21.845 --> 1:30:22.045
<v Speaker 4>for me.

1:30:22.725 --> 1:30:27.125
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, I remember watching this in a press screening. Wasn't

1:30:27.125 --> 1:30:29.245
<v Speaker 1>at the Lake Street screening room, but in a press screening,

1:30:29.685 --> 1:30:32.725
<v Speaker 1>and my immediate reaction when this scene happened was they

1:30:32.805 --> 1:30:36.205
<v Speaker 1>did it because you'd been hearing about this movie being

1:30:36.245 --> 1:30:41.005
<v Speaker 1>in development for so long and I didn't know if

1:30:41.045 --> 1:30:43.764
<v Speaker 1>it could work until we saw the scene of Peter

1:30:43.925 --> 1:30:48.445
<v Speaker 1>actually trying out his powers and they pulled it off.

1:30:48.565 --> 1:30:50.845
<v Speaker 1>It absolutely worked. It was thrilling, it was funny as

1:30:50.885 --> 1:30:53.885
<v Speaker 1>the character should be. All the things you said, it's

1:30:53.965 --> 1:30:57.005
<v Speaker 1>my number six, it's you know, the top honorable mention

1:30:57.165 --> 1:31:02.205
<v Speaker 1>for me. I think it captures the genial enthusiasm, which

1:31:02.285 --> 1:31:06.205
<v Speaker 1>is a core trade of the character as well. Sometimes

1:31:06.325 --> 1:31:08.085
<v Speaker 1>some of these movies try a little too hard to

1:31:08.165 --> 1:31:11.925
<v Speaker 1>force that into fights here and there, but it's perfect

1:31:12.005 --> 1:31:16.125
<v Speaker 1>for this sequence where Peter's response is yes, confused, maybe

1:31:16.165 --> 1:31:20.205
<v Speaker 1>a little nervous, but mostly this genial enthusiasm. And you

1:31:20.325 --> 1:31:23.165
<v Speaker 1>mentioned the Elphan score. The best part of it is

1:31:24.125 --> 1:31:26.445
<v Speaker 1>when he starts crawling up that wall, the way the

1:31:26.645 --> 1:31:31.405
<v Speaker 1>music inches the wall with him with him. So yeah,

1:31:32.045 --> 1:31:34.885
<v Speaker 1>just just a really great scene and my top honorable mention.

1:31:35.645 --> 1:31:38.845
<v Speaker 4>Those are our top five Spider Man scenes. We would

1:31:38.845 --> 1:31:41.365
<v Speaker 4>love to hear your picks or any other comments about

1:31:41.365 --> 1:31:43.525
<v Speaker 4>the show. You can email us feedback at film spotting

1:31:43.565 --> 1:31:45.765
<v Speaker 4>dot net. Once again, you can find all of our

1:31:45.885 --> 1:31:48.725
<v Speaker 4>choices and links to the scenes at film spotting dot

1:31:48.805 --> 1:31:51.605
<v Speaker 4>net just by clicking on lists right there at the

1:31:51.725 --> 1:31:55.285
<v Speaker 4>top of the page. Josh, you did list one of

1:31:55.325 --> 1:31:57.564
<v Speaker 4>your honorable mentions for us already. Do you have any

1:31:57.685 --> 1:31:58.805
<v Speaker 4>others you would like to throw in?

1:31:59.405 --> 1:32:01.045
<v Speaker 1>Well, I feel like I should give a bone to

1:32:01.125 --> 1:32:04.005
<v Speaker 1>the Andrew Garfield fans. I mean, you know, Drew Drew

1:32:04.085 --> 1:32:07.125
<v Speaker 1>came to his defense, but you've just you've been scared

1:32:07.205 --> 1:32:11.685
<v Speaker 1>by your your amazing Spider Graw experience. So how about this?

1:32:12.085 --> 1:32:14.125
<v Speaker 1>And it speaks to some of the things we've been

1:32:14.165 --> 1:32:16.685
<v Speaker 1>talking about. But in The Amazing Spider Man, there's a

1:32:16.765 --> 1:32:20.925
<v Speaker 1>rescue sequence where Spider Man convinces a kid who is

1:32:21.125 --> 1:32:23.285
<v Speaker 1>is in a car that's dangling from a bridge and

1:32:23.325 --> 1:32:26.045
<v Speaker 1>he's trying to convince him to climb out and you know,

1:32:26.445 --> 1:32:28.644
<v Speaker 1>come to him, come to safety, and the kid is scared,

1:32:29.125 --> 1:32:32.085
<v Speaker 1>and what he does to convince him is he takes

1:32:32.485 --> 1:32:35.205
<v Speaker 1>his masks and gives it to the kid and says,

1:32:35.245 --> 1:32:37.445
<v Speaker 1>it'll make you strong. And I think that, you know,

1:32:37.605 --> 1:32:40.405
<v Speaker 1>it's a really nice moment that also speaks to the

1:32:40.445 --> 1:32:42.525
<v Speaker 1>intimacy that we've touched on. So I would say that

1:32:43.725 --> 1:32:47.604
<v Speaker 1>for the Andrew Garfield run, I feel like I need

1:32:47.685 --> 1:32:51.605
<v Speaker 1>to acknowledge the Spider Men reunion that takes place in

1:32:51.725 --> 1:32:56.005
<v Speaker 1>Spider Man No Way Home. I think that's not a

1:32:56.085 --> 1:32:58.685
<v Speaker 1>super successful I mean I liked it okay, but a

1:32:58.725 --> 1:33:02.205
<v Speaker 1>super successful Spider Man movie. And maybe it's a little

1:33:02.245 --> 1:33:05.965
<v Speaker 1>hokey that all of the previous Spider Man come to

1:33:06.205 --> 1:33:09.325
<v Speaker 1>join Tom Holland. But if you are a completist or

1:33:09.365 --> 1:33:15.485
<v Speaker 1>you have a long history with this character, I'm sorry, it's.

1:33:14.605 --> 1:33:15.205
<v Speaker 4>Kind of cool.

1:33:15.405 --> 1:33:16.885
<v Speaker 1>I mean what they asked the actors to do is

1:33:16.965 --> 1:33:18.885
<v Speaker 1>kind of lame, but the idea is cool enough. Okay,

1:33:18.965 --> 1:33:22.365
<v Speaker 1>So let's say that the opening of Spider Man Across

1:33:22.445 --> 1:33:27.605
<v Speaker 1>the Universe is essentially a mini Spider Gwen movie, and

1:33:28.245 --> 1:33:31.765
<v Speaker 1>it's wonderful. You talked about the color work in the

1:33:31.845 --> 1:33:35.885
<v Speaker 1>scene we both picked with Miles and Spider Gwen. But this,

1:33:36.525 --> 1:33:39.085
<v Speaker 1>I think of that sequence where she's having that fight

1:33:39.205 --> 1:33:42.684
<v Speaker 1>with her father and the background walls just start dripping

1:33:42.805 --> 1:33:46.965
<v Speaker 1>like water colors. Incredible. Yeah, I think I'll go with

1:33:47.045 --> 1:33:48.564
<v Speaker 1>those for my honorable mentions.

1:33:48.965 --> 1:33:50.764
<v Speaker 4>Yeah, we have covered a lot of the same ground.

1:33:50.845 --> 1:33:55.045
<v Speaker 4>Because I already mentioned to the run your list the

1:33:55.125 --> 1:33:58.485
<v Speaker 4>upside down kiss scene stopping the train Spider Gwen was

1:33:58.525 --> 1:34:00.325
<v Speaker 4>one that stood out to me that opening.

1:34:01.285 --> 1:34:03.685
<v Speaker 5>And you know what I do.

1:34:05.165 --> 1:34:08.564
<v Speaker 4>Or I am willing to give a nod to Peters

1:34:09.085 --> 1:34:14.045
<v Speaker 4>reuniting in the latest Spider Man movie. Which one is

1:34:14.085 --> 1:34:16.165
<v Speaker 4>that again? No Way Home? Is that what we're calling that?

1:34:16.405 --> 1:34:19.845
<v Speaker 4>No Way Home? Yes? From twenty twenty one. In terms

1:34:19.925 --> 1:34:23.005
<v Speaker 4>of one or two, the didn't mention. I do have

1:34:23.525 --> 1:34:27.885
<v Speaker 4>a moment that I called out during our Spider Man conversation,

1:34:28.325 --> 1:34:35.245
<v Speaker 4>our twenty year anniversary conversation where Aunt May chides Willem Dafoe,

1:34:35.325 --> 1:34:39.045
<v Speaker 4>who I think is great, chides Willem Dafoe's Norman Osborne.

1:34:39.085 --> 1:34:41.205
<v Speaker 4>I can't remember exactly what he says, but he says

1:34:41.285 --> 1:34:44.604
<v Speaker 4>something that she gives him a little slap on the wrist,

1:34:44.805 --> 1:34:46.485
<v Speaker 4>and the way she does it and the way he

1:34:46.685 --> 1:34:49.925
<v Speaker 4>reacts to it he doesn't like. He doesn't like the

1:34:50.005 --> 1:34:53.685
<v Speaker 4>way she puts him in his place he's not used to.

1:34:53.765 --> 1:34:56.805
<v Speaker 4>That is really is really great into the Spider verse.

1:34:56.845 --> 1:35:00.405
<v Speaker 4>I mean, this is one of those iconic Mount Rushmore moments,

1:35:00.445 --> 1:35:02.885
<v Speaker 4>perhaps as well, but the Leap of Faith is another

1:35:03.245 --> 1:35:08.405
<v Speaker 4>great visual and and thematic moment as well. I thought, Josh,

1:35:08.485 --> 1:35:12.765
<v Speaker 4>that I would and I did the research here. I

1:35:12.885 --> 1:35:16.205
<v Speaker 4>thought that I would be able to find something from

1:35:16.925 --> 1:35:19.724
<v Speaker 4>This was going to be my off the beaten path surprise,

1:35:19.885 --> 1:35:22.405
<v Speaker 4>Josh Pick. You know you went with the I should

1:35:22.405 --> 1:35:25.925
<v Speaker 4>have known it was coming now. It's a trend. But

1:35:26.205 --> 1:35:28.565
<v Speaker 4>just as you went with the theme music or the

1:35:28.845 --> 1:35:32.525
<v Speaker 4>opening theme moment, I thought, here's where I'm gonna surprise Josh.

1:35:32.685 --> 1:35:36.365
<v Speaker 4>I'm gonna even though this isn't that risky here or whatever,

1:35:37.205 --> 1:35:40.405
<v Speaker 4>that much of a surprise, I'm gonna go with a

1:35:40.525 --> 1:35:44.564
<v Speaker 4>Spider Man moment from one of the Avengers movies or Captain.

1:35:44.565 --> 1:35:46.005
<v Speaker 1>I thought about that, Yeah, right.

1:35:46.805 --> 1:35:49.085
<v Speaker 4>And I went back and watched every scene I could

1:35:49.125 --> 1:35:51.764
<v Speaker 4>get my hand on. I thought, surely one of these scenes,

1:35:51.845 --> 1:35:55.685
<v Speaker 4>the relationship between him and Tony Stark, they have such

1:35:55.725 --> 1:35:59.525
<v Speaker 4>a bond, fun that they have such a bond, And

1:35:59.765 --> 1:36:03.125
<v Speaker 4>and and who doesn't love Tony Stark? Who doesn't love

1:36:03.205 --> 1:36:05.925
<v Speaker 4>Robert Downey Jr. I'm I'm surely going to find a

1:36:06.005 --> 1:36:09.165
<v Speaker 4>scene that I love. It's gonna jog my memory and

1:36:09.205 --> 1:36:11.245
<v Speaker 4>I'm gonna I'm gonna feel like I have to put

1:36:11.285 --> 1:36:13.125
<v Speaker 4>this in my top five. And not only did I

1:36:13.245 --> 1:36:15.604
<v Speaker 4>not find a scene from Civil War or Infinity War

1:36:15.725 --> 1:36:18.845
<v Speaker 4>or Endgame that made my top five. I this is

1:36:18.885 --> 1:36:20.965
<v Speaker 4>the honorable mention I'm giving it is that I really

1:36:21.085 --> 1:36:23.644
<v Speaker 4>couldn't find one, a single scene from any of those movies.

1:36:23.725 --> 1:36:27.205
<v Speaker 1>Joshua is that he does appear in the Avengers.

1:36:27.485 --> 1:36:30.644
<v Speaker 4>He appears in those movies. So maybe that's some feedback

1:36:30.725 --> 1:36:34.645
<v Speaker 4>I'm I'm looking for from listeners in general. But you

1:36:34.685 --> 1:36:36.805
<v Speaker 4>can give us any feedback on the list, But specifically,

1:36:37.885 --> 1:36:40.205
<v Speaker 4>is there something Is there a key scene from many

1:36:40.205 --> 1:36:42.005
<v Speaker 4>of those and I know I know there's there's the

1:36:42.085 --> 1:36:45.604
<v Speaker 4>death scene, and there's the there's the life. But those

1:36:45.645 --> 1:36:46.564
<v Speaker 4>don't stand out to me.

1:36:48.085 --> 1:36:50.564
<v Speaker 1>In the moment and in the context. I think they're

1:36:50.765 --> 1:36:53.045
<v Speaker 1>I think they're very effective. I think his return is

1:36:53.165 --> 1:36:56.085
<v Speaker 1>quite moving, and I think his presence what he brings

1:36:56.845 --> 1:36:59.925
<v Speaker 1>just even as a character to that battle scene, it's

1:36:59.965 --> 1:37:02.125
<v Speaker 1>like at an airport or something like that. Right, Yeah,

1:37:02.805 --> 1:37:07.245
<v Speaker 1>in Civil War, I think is a nice there's some

1:37:07.365 --> 1:37:10.685
<v Speaker 1>nice levity there with what else we're getting. So I

1:37:10.765 --> 1:37:13.205
<v Speaker 1>think he's quite good and a welcome presence in all

1:37:13.245 --> 1:37:16.325
<v Speaker 1>those movies. I just didn't have anything from them that

1:37:16.405 --> 1:37:19.365
<v Speaker 1>could rival, you know, the ricks that we made.

1:37:19.885 --> 1:37:23.365
<v Speaker 4>Okay, what's again our top five Spider Man scenes? Email

1:37:23.485 --> 1:37:28.165
<v Speaker 4>us yours feedback at film spotting dot net, Josh, that's

1:37:28.205 --> 1:37:28.564
<v Speaker 4>our show.

1:37:29.845 --> 1:37:31.885
<v Speaker 1>If you want to find Adam in the show on

1:37:32.085 --> 1:37:36.045
<v Speaker 1>social media, you can find them on Instagram, Facebook, letterbox, YouTube,

1:37:36.085 --> 1:37:39.245
<v Speaker 1>and blue Sky. At film Spotting, I'm at those places

1:37:39.445 --> 1:37:43.764
<v Speaker 1>at larsen on Film. We are independently produced and listeners supported.

1:37:43.885 --> 1:37:47.925
<v Speaker 1>You can support the show for twenty percent off right

1:37:48.005 --> 1:37:52.325
<v Speaker 1>now by joining the film Spotting Family at filmspottingfamily dot com.

1:37:53.005 --> 1:37:56.684
<v Speaker 1>Just use the code summer to get your twenty percent off.

1:37:57.045 --> 1:37:58.445
<v Speaker 1>If you do that, you'll be able to listen to

1:37:58.725 --> 1:38:00.805
<v Speaker 1>the show early and ad free. You'll also get monthly

1:38:00.845 --> 1:38:03.885
<v Speaker 1>bonus episodes, a weekly newsletter, and access to the entire

1:38:04.005 --> 1:38:07.085
<v Speaker 1>show archive. For show t shirts and other merch go

1:38:07.165 --> 1:38:09.405
<v Speaker 1>to film spotting dot net slash shop.

1:38:10.165 --> 1:38:13.604
<v Speaker 4>Out in limited release this weekend is I Want Your Sex,

1:38:13.725 --> 1:38:17.245
<v Speaker 4>the new movie from director Greg Araki, with Olivia Wilde

1:38:17.365 --> 1:38:20.405
<v Speaker 4>and Cooper Hoffman. Friend of the show, Mitchell bo Pray

1:38:20.445 --> 1:38:23.285
<v Speaker 4>at Letterbox says, a rocky, sex filled riff on something

1:38:23.445 --> 1:38:25.805
<v Speaker 4>like The Lady Eve or Ball of Fire. Okay, I

1:38:25.925 --> 1:38:29.725
<v Speaker 4>was interested, now at more interested. Boyhood is being re

1:38:29.925 --> 1:38:34.604
<v Speaker 4>released unfortunately only in Alamo drafthouse theaters and other independent chains.

1:38:34.645 --> 1:38:38.005
<v Speaker 4>It does say, other independent chains, but not one near me. Josh,

1:38:38.085 --> 1:38:42.285
<v Speaker 4>I can't see that beloved film of mine back in theaters.

1:38:42.485 --> 1:38:45.965
<v Speaker 4>The Kidnapping of Arabella is a new film from Italian

1:38:46.005 --> 1:38:50.845
<v Speaker 4>writer director Carolina Cavali. Friend of the show Robert Daniel says,

1:38:51.365 --> 1:38:54.085
<v Speaker 4>and you can't say this isn't intriguing. What if Roy

1:38:54.165 --> 1:38:56.724
<v Speaker 4>Anderson made Thelma and Louise.

1:38:59.685 --> 1:39:01.525
<v Speaker 1>I'm gonna need a few minutes, take a.

1:39:01.525 --> 1:39:05.644
<v Speaker 4>Minute to process that one. Okay, we know Roy Anderson's

1:39:05.645 --> 1:39:08.405
<v Speaker 4>worked fairly well. So yeah, Sheep in the Box. This

1:39:08.525 --> 1:39:11.564
<v Speaker 4>is the latest from Hirikazu Korata. Big year for Sheep

1:39:11.885 --> 1:39:14.805
<v Speaker 4>at the Movies, a near future set film about a

1:39:14.845 --> 1:39:19.085
<v Speaker 4>family raising a humanoid robot as a sun at the

1:39:19.165 --> 1:39:23.125
<v Speaker 4>music Box, Korata, I am, I am interested? Out wide

1:39:23.365 --> 1:39:26.565
<v Speaker 4>is spider Man brand new day, So next week you

1:39:26.685 --> 1:39:30.765
<v Speaker 4>can't expect more Spider Man talk. We will get to

1:39:31.165 --> 1:39:34.245
<v Speaker 4>the latest Spider Man movie starring Tom Holland next week.

1:39:34.325 --> 1:39:36.604
<v Speaker 4>In the Film Spotting Feed, that's our show on Friday

1:39:36.685 --> 1:39:39.885
<v Speaker 4>Monday is episode three of the movie Deathmatch. It is

1:39:39.965 --> 1:39:43.485
<v Speaker 4>a lot of spidery. Sorry, hopefully you'll be interested. Great

1:39:43.565 --> 1:39:46.845
<v Speaker 4>conversation though, Matt Singer and Daisy Rosario about spider Man

1:39:46.925 --> 1:39:50.285
<v Speaker 4>two and into the spider Verse. See which one gets

1:39:50.365 --> 1:39:53.045
<v Speaker 4>crowned the definitive Spider Man movie. It's going to be

1:39:53.085 --> 1:39:55.485
<v Speaker 4>one of those two. Host Chris Klemack has to be

1:39:56.005 --> 1:39:59.405
<v Speaker 4>the judge and make that tough call and Josh, that's

1:39:59.485 --> 1:40:01.965
<v Speaker 4>it because it's break time for the next picture show.

1:40:02.005 --> 1:40:04.805
<v Speaker 4>In Film Spotting SVU, I guess they've earned it.

1:40:07.165 --> 1:40:09.644
<v Speaker 1>Sure, yeah, yeah they do. They do deserve a break.

1:40:10.405 --> 1:40:12.925
<v Speaker 1>Film Spotting is produced by Golden Joe Toso and Sam

1:40:13.085 --> 1:40:16.165
<v Speaker 1>Van Holgren. Without Sam and Golden Joe, this show wouldn't go.

1:40:16.605 --> 1:40:20.125
<v Speaker 1>Our production assistant is Sophiekempanar special thanks to everyone at

1:40:20.245 --> 1:40:24.885
<v Speaker 1>wbeasy Chicago. More information is available at wbez dot org.

1:40:25.285 --> 1:40:26.804
<v Speaker 1>For film Spotty, I'm Josh.

1:40:26.685 --> 1:40:29.405
<v Speaker 4>Larson and I'm Adam Kempinar. Thanks for listening.

1:40:29.645 --> 1:40:33.965
<v Speaker 2>This conversation can serve no purpose anymore. Good Bye,