WEBVTT - Tech Selloff and Apple's Game Plan

0:00:02.240 --> 0:00:05.600
<v Speaker 1>From the heart of where innovation, money and power live,

0:00:06.360 --> 0:00:10.879
<v Speaker 1>in Silicon Valley and beyond. This is Bloomberg technology with

0:00:10.960 --> 0:00:27.040
<v Speaker 1>Emily Jay. I'm at Ludlow in New York in Emily Chang.

0:00:27.080 --> 0:00:30.040
<v Speaker 1>This is Bloomberg Technology. Coming up in the next hour.

0:00:30.160 --> 0:00:33.160
<v Speaker 1>A major sell off hits tech and the markets at large,

0:00:33.400 --> 0:00:37.200
<v Speaker 1>nearing two lows. Will have the latest in a moment. Plus,

0:00:37.560 --> 0:00:40.400
<v Speaker 1>apple is jumping into the sports industry, from the Super

0:00:40.440 --> 0:00:44.640
<v Speaker 1>Bowl halftime show and NFL Sunday ticket to tonight's potentially

0:00:44.720 --> 0:00:48.080
<v Speaker 1>historic Major League baseball broadcast. We're talking about how the

0:00:48.120 --> 0:00:52.600
<v Speaker 1>company is eating away at traditional TV's most coveted assets.

0:00:53.320 --> 0:00:55.960
<v Speaker 1>and NASA hopes to launch the Artemis Mission to the

0:00:56.000 --> 0:00:59.200
<v Speaker 1>moon next week. We'll get the latest from our space reporter,

0:00:59.680 --> 0:01:02.320
<v Speaker 1>Laura Grush. We'll get to that in a moment, but

0:01:02.400 --> 0:01:05.759
<v Speaker 1>first let's talk markets. Friday was rough a sell off,

0:01:05.760 --> 0:01:08.640
<v Speaker 1>and risk your assets deepened as spheres of a global

0:01:08.680 --> 0:01:12.040
<v Speaker 1>recession intensified. Tech was not spared, with the NASDAC on

0:01:12.600 --> 0:01:16.080
<v Speaker 1>falling to its lowest level since June, the SMP touching

0:01:16.120 --> 0:01:20.200
<v Speaker 1>two year lows and wall streets fear gauge soaring toward

0:01:20.240 --> 0:01:22.440
<v Speaker 1>a three month high, joining me to go over this

0:01:22.680 --> 0:01:25.399
<v Speaker 1>less than happy and to the week. Who else but

0:01:25.480 --> 0:01:28.560
<v Speaker 1>bloom bows, Casey Gray felt? I'll ask you again, how

0:01:28.600 --> 0:01:31.839
<v Speaker 1>are you? I'm all tired. It was an intense day

0:01:31.920 --> 0:01:34.200
<v Speaker 1>to an intense week. I remember there was a fed

0:01:34.319 --> 0:01:35.840
<v Speaker 1>meeting all the way back on Wednesday. It feels like

0:01:35.880 --> 0:01:37.720
<v Speaker 1>a year ago. Let's go back to basics. There was

0:01:37.720 --> 0:01:40.160
<v Speaker 1>a fed meeting on Wednesday. The Fed raised rates by

0:01:40.160 --> 0:01:43.800
<v Speaker 1>seventy five basis points and the dot plot, the four

0:01:43.920 --> 0:01:46.920
<v Speaker 1>court cast, showed four point four percent rates by the

0:01:46.959 --> 0:01:50.480
<v Speaker 1>end of the year, four point six rates further out,

0:01:51.440 --> 0:01:54.520
<v Speaker 1>the terminal rate. Exactly? Why have markets reacted like this? Well,

0:01:54.600 --> 0:01:57.240
<v Speaker 1>Jeron power is pretty clear on Wednesday that this wouldn't

0:01:57.280 --> 0:02:00.560
<v Speaker 1>be a painless process. That big, aggressive vision up in

0:02:00.600 --> 0:02:04.080
<v Speaker 1>the dark plot. That's going to cause pain for the economy.

0:02:04.120 --> 0:02:07.120
<v Speaker 1>That's causing pain for the market. But today was especially

0:02:07.200 --> 0:02:10.600
<v Speaker 1>dramatic because it actually started over in England, and you

0:02:10.639 --> 0:02:14.080
<v Speaker 1>would liz trust's government unvel, I believe, the biggest tax

0:02:14.120 --> 0:02:19.760
<v Speaker 1>const since two this is into a economy that's already

0:02:19.800 --> 0:02:22.720
<v Speaker 1>dealing with ultra hot inflation. You have a very aggressive

0:02:22.760 --> 0:02:25.000
<v Speaker 1>Bank of England and again, if you think about the

0:02:25.000 --> 0:02:28.440
<v Speaker 1>global tightening that's going on. This is just another crank

0:02:28.639 --> 0:02:33.120
<v Speaker 1>tighter and that fear was definitely present across global assets.

0:02:33.160 --> 0:02:36.120
<v Speaker 1>So there was just another thing to add anxiety to

0:02:36.120 --> 0:02:37.840
<v Speaker 1>the market. So I'M gonna look at this chart on

0:02:37.880 --> 0:02:41.240
<v Speaker 1>the Bloomberg terminal, which shows the kind of decline we've

0:02:41.240 --> 0:02:44.120
<v Speaker 1>seen in tech stocks in particular, but also the push

0:02:44.200 --> 0:02:47.360
<v Speaker 1>higher in real yields. And we keep talking about the Fed.

0:02:47.480 --> 0:02:49.600
<v Speaker 1>Every week I'm here with Emily Chang, I'm talking about

0:02:49.639 --> 0:02:52.920
<v Speaker 1>the Fed. We talk about it because higher rates discount

0:02:52.960 --> 0:02:56.440
<v Speaker 1>the present value of future profits for tech stocks. But

0:02:56.520 --> 0:02:59.520
<v Speaker 1>it seems like a one to punch for the audience.

0:02:59.560 --> 0:03:01.640
<v Speaker 1>I just did a one too and it looks great

0:03:01.760 --> 0:03:04.919
<v Speaker 1>and you're exactly right. So you're using some C F

0:03:05.000 --> 0:03:07.680
<v Speaker 1>A terms here, but they're really important, and that real yield,

0:03:07.720 --> 0:03:10.280
<v Speaker 1>the fact that real yields have screened high again, the

0:03:10.360 --> 0:03:14.240
<v Speaker 1>yield that you get on bonds after accounting for inflation.

0:03:14.639 --> 0:03:19.119
<v Speaker 1>That is sort of the basis for valuing other assets,

0:03:19.200 --> 0:03:21.440
<v Speaker 1>and the fact that you are seeing those really yield

0:03:21.520 --> 0:03:25.160
<v Speaker 1>scream higher. That has a lot of implications for duration

0:03:25.280 --> 0:03:28.680
<v Speaker 1>heavy stocks such as tech stocks, those growth stocks, where

0:03:28.720 --> 0:03:31.160
<v Speaker 1>a lot of those cash flows are expected in the future.

0:03:31.560 --> 0:03:34.440
<v Speaker 1>They're worth less when you have that discount raycle and

0:03:34.480 --> 0:03:38.320
<v Speaker 1>speaking about growth, the fear is about slow down in

0:03:38.360 --> 0:03:41.280
<v Speaker 1>global growth. That's almost the other punch right that the

0:03:41.280 --> 0:03:43.440
<v Speaker 1>other consequences of the Fed is that actually, even if

0:03:43.480 --> 0:03:45.640
<v Speaker 1>you're a megacap tech stock like an apple and Amazon,

0:03:45.640 --> 0:03:48.640
<v Speaker 1>we've seen declines in those that the world's a different

0:03:48.640 --> 0:03:51.800
<v Speaker 1>place now, the economy slowing down and they might suffer

0:03:52.160 --> 0:03:55.120
<v Speaker 1>the other fear, so to speak, the fear games fear

0:03:55.240 --> 0:03:57.480
<v Speaker 1>here vix. Talk to me about the Vicks. We don't

0:03:57.520 --> 0:03:59.600
<v Speaker 1>cover it as much on the tech show, but briefly

0:03:59.600 --> 0:04:01.800
<v Speaker 1>explain what it is and what that is. So the VIX.

0:04:01.840 --> 0:04:05.440
<v Speaker 1>It's looking at expectations for volatility for the next thirty

0:04:05.520 --> 0:04:08.200
<v Speaker 1>days and it's been a bit of a frusting, frustrating

0:04:08.240 --> 0:04:10.680
<v Speaker 1>indicator to watch because if you look at the Vix,

0:04:10.760 --> 0:04:15.120
<v Speaker 1>it's been relattively low. I mean it was getting back

0:04:15.160 --> 0:04:18.560
<v Speaker 1>to thirties today, but it's been very low relative to

0:04:18.600 --> 0:04:21.120
<v Speaker 1>some of the levels that we saw during the pandemic

0:04:21.520 --> 0:04:24.279
<v Speaker 1>during the past two years. And you compare that to

0:04:24.320 --> 0:04:26.320
<v Speaker 1>what we've actually seen in the equity market, it doesn't

0:04:26.320 --> 0:04:28.839
<v Speaker 1>feel like it's matched the reality on the ground. But

0:04:28.880 --> 0:04:30.800
<v Speaker 1>you are starting to see some movement in the vix.

0:04:30.839 --> 0:04:33.360
<v Speaker 1>Today it got to a three month high, so some

0:04:33.440 --> 0:04:35.279
<v Speaker 1>of that fear is starting to show up in the

0:04:35.320 --> 0:04:37.839
<v Speaker 1>vix and what's been a very orderly sell off thus far.

0:04:38.240 --> 0:04:41.840
<v Speaker 1>It's the weekend. You can take a rest. The Fed

0:04:41.920 --> 0:04:45.400
<v Speaker 1>speak to come. Fed speak to come. My sources tell me,

0:04:45.520 --> 0:04:49.760
<v Speaker 1>Romaine postic specifically, that there's thirteen unique fed speakers next week.

0:04:49.800 --> 0:04:51.680
<v Speaker 1>This is going to be important to watch. Even if

0:04:51.720 --> 0:04:54.040
<v Speaker 1>you're a tech investor, you should keep an eye on

0:04:54.080 --> 0:04:56.160
<v Speaker 1>the Fed speak because it's going to be interesting to

0:04:56.200 --> 0:04:58.960
<v Speaker 1>see what any sort of message, any sort of crumbs,

0:04:58.960 --> 0:05:01.799
<v Speaker 1>they leave about how they feel about this market reaction.

0:05:01.839 --> 0:05:05.760
<v Speaker 1>If you go back to after Jackson Hole, this speech

0:05:05.800 --> 0:05:08.719
<v Speaker 1>that Jeron Powell gave, markets puked in the aftermath of

0:05:08.760 --> 0:05:11.159
<v Speaker 1>that and then you actually had minneapolis fed President Neil

0:05:11.240 --> 0:05:13.919
<v Speaker 1>Kash cary say that he was happy to see that

0:05:14.080 --> 0:05:16.000
<v Speaker 1>market reaction. I don't know if we're going to get

0:05:16.000 --> 0:05:19.159
<v Speaker 1>anything as explicit as that, but any sort of hints

0:05:19.200 --> 0:05:23.159
<v Speaker 1>along that line, that line would be very interesting. Puke,

0:05:23.760 --> 0:05:26.600
<v Speaker 1>what a happy way to end the week. Bloomberg's Katie Greifeld,

0:05:27.080 --> 0:05:38.920
<v Speaker 1>thank you very much. Apple has become a serious threat

0:05:39.120 --> 0:05:42.840
<v Speaker 1>to traditional cable providers propped up by live sports. Three

0:05:42.839 --> 0:05:45.680
<v Speaker 1>major storylines are playing out that could make apple a

0:05:45.720 --> 0:05:49.599
<v Speaker 1>real player in sports broadcasting. Apple TV has only aired

0:05:49.720 --> 0:05:52.640
<v Speaker 1>MLB Games for a few months, but tonight it could

0:05:52.640 --> 0:05:56.080
<v Speaker 1>have record viewership, with Aaron Judge One home run away

0:05:56.400 --> 0:06:00.560
<v Speaker 1>from MLB history. Apple Music will become the title sponsor

0:06:00.800 --> 0:06:03.960
<v Speaker 1>of the Super Bowl halftime show, taking over from Pepsi,

0:06:04.240 --> 0:06:06.840
<v Speaker 1>and Apple is in talks with the NFL to take

0:06:06.920 --> 0:06:10.320
<v Speaker 1>the AAL assets Sunday ticket package from direct TV and

0:06:10.360 --> 0:06:14.000
<v Speaker 1>a deal that could top two point five billion dollars.

0:06:14.240 --> 0:06:16.440
<v Speaker 1>Here's how crucial this could be for apple. A recent

0:06:16.520 --> 0:06:20.880
<v Speaker 1>survey of NFL fans found that forty percent of them

0:06:20.920 --> 0:06:24.960
<v Speaker 1>definitely will or are likely to subscribe to Sunday ticket

0:06:24.960 --> 0:06:28.159
<v Speaker 1>went offered by a major streaming provider. Here to discuss

0:06:28.240 --> 0:06:31.600
<v Speaker 1>is Bloomberg's apple reporter, Mark German, and Bloomberg business of

0:06:31.640 --> 0:06:35.200
<v Speaker 1>sports reporter Brandon Sapienza. Brandon, I'm gonna Start with you.

0:06:35.520 --> 0:06:39.039
<v Speaker 1>Big Game Friday night and it matters for a guy

0:06:39.080 --> 0:06:42.880
<v Speaker 1>called Aaron judge and it matters for Apple TV. Set

0:06:42.880 --> 0:06:44.960
<v Speaker 1>the stage for us. Why do we care? Well, I

0:06:45.000 --> 0:06:47.440
<v Speaker 1>mean Aaron Judge Could Tai Roger Marris with the sixty

0:06:47.480 --> 0:06:50.240
<v Speaker 1>one time run. Obviously that's really big news. Yankee fans

0:06:50.240 --> 0:06:52.479
<v Speaker 1>have been waiting a long season to see that happen,

0:06:52.920 --> 0:06:54.719
<v Speaker 1>but they might not get I'll get the chance to

0:06:54.720 --> 0:06:56.880
<v Speaker 1>do that tonight. So a lot of them are really upset.

0:06:56.920 --> 0:06:59.480
<v Speaker 1>They've personally attest to that they might not get the

0:06:59.560 --> 0:07:01.960
<v Speaker 1>chance to do the mock. Give us the specifics. Hey,

0:07:02.080 --> 0:07:04.799
<v Speaker 1>what is the deal that apple has with Major League Baseball?

0:07:06.000 --> 0:07:07.760
<v Speaker 1>So for the past few weeks, as you said, or

0:07:07.760 --> 0:07:09.760
<v Speaker 1>a few months I should say, through the Apple TV

0:07:09.840 --> 0:07:12.640
<v Speaker 1>APP on all of the supported devices, apple has aired

0:07:12.640 --> 0:07:15.880
<v Speaker 1>two MLB Games every Friday night. They put the schedules

0:07:15.880 --> 0:07:18.440
<v Speaker 1>out a few weeks in advance. It just so happens

0:07:18.440 --> 0:07:21.760
<v Speaker 1>that this agreed upon game featuring the Yankees and Aaron

0:07:21.840 --> 0:07:24.480
<v Speaker 1>judge tonight. That's the game that everyone in New York

0:07:24.520 --> 0:07:27.000
<v Speaker 1>wants to see and because of that agreement it won't

0:07:27.040 --> 0:07:29.520
<v Speaker 1>be aired on the Y S network. That's the local

0:07:29.560 --> 0:07:32.440
<v Speaker 1>network in New York. So if Brandon wants to watch that,

0:07:32.520 --> 0:07:34.240
<v Speaker 1>he won't be able to unless he signs up for

0:07:34.240 --> 0:07:38.080
<v Speaker 1>Apple TV. Now the positive year is that this goes

0:07:38.080 --> 0:07:40.520
<v Speaker 1>against some speculation I've seen, you don't actually have to

0:07:40.520 --> 0:07:42.480
<v Speaker 1>pay for it right. Some people thought you had to

0:07:42.520 --> 0:07:44.720
<v Speaker 1>pay the four day nine per month for Apple TV

0:07:44.800 --> 0:07:47.560
<v Speaker 1>plus to actually view it. That's not the case. Still,

0:07:47.800 --> 0:07:50.520
<v Speaker 1>the MLB deal is free. At some point, though, I

0:07:50.560 --> 0:07:52.880
<v Speaker 1>think they'll charge for it. But for tonight you really

0:07:52.920 --> 0:07:55.000
<v Speaker 1>just need an apple TV APP or access to the

0:07:55.000 --> 0:07:57.200
<v Speaker 1>APP in order to watch the game. Jens, I wanted

0:07:57.280 --> 0:07:59.960
<v Speaker 1>to get the mood music out there across New York.

0:08:00.000 --> 0:08:01.840
<v Speaker 1>So what did I do? I took to twitter and

0:08:01.920 --> 0:08:05.239
<v Speaker 1>I did a twitter poll and I asked Yankees Fans,

0:08:05.520 --> 0:08:09.560
<v Speaker 1>Major League baseball fans, WHO's watching the game tonight on

0:08:09.640 --> 0:08:12.640
<v Speaker 1>Apple TV plus? That's the results. Now, okay, Pinch your

0:08:12.680 --> 0:08:17.400
<v Speaker 1>salt here. It's not exactly scientific. Around six votes, but no,

0:08:18.000 --> 0:08:20.160
<v Speaker 1>forty three point five PC. I guess a lot of

0:08:20.160 --> 0:08:22.920
<v Speaker 1>people are going to go and see it themselves in person.

0:08:23.320 --> 0:08:25.760
<v Speaker 1>But if you are a Yankees fan or you're a

0:08:25.800 --> 0:08:30.800
<v Speaker 1>baseball fan, brandon, it's a complicated season. Yeah, what do

0:08:30.840 --> 0:08:33.360
<v Speaker 1>you need to do across the season if you live

0:08:33.360 --> 0:08:35.160
<v Speaker 1>in the state, in New York to Actually Watch a game?

0:08:35.320 --> 0:08:36.719
<v Speaker 1>So if you live in the city of New York,

0:08:36.720 --> 0:08:39.800
<v Speaker 1>you're actually for services to get you a Yankee game.

0:08:39.920 --> 0:08:42.200
<v Speaker 1>So either you need one of to view one of

0:08:42.200 --> 0:08:45.280
<v Speaker 1>the PEACR Games. Need Peacock, then you need Amazon TV,

0:08:45.480 --> 0:08:48.560
<v Speaker 1>Amazon prime. They needed a cable network or something that

0:08:48.600 --> 0:08:51.160
<v Speaker 1>has access to the yes network, which I think is

0:08:51.200 --> 0:08:54.679
<v Speaker 1>only direct TV stream in the case of if you

0:08:54.720 --> 0:08:57.079
<v Speaker 1>want to stream if you're unplugged from cable. And then

0:08:57.120 --> 0:08:59.520
<v Speaker 1>obviously you need apple TV, which I know, as Mark said,

0:08:59.520 --> 0:09:01.640
<v Speaker 1>it is free, but for a lot of fans it's

0:09:01.640 --> 0:09:03.360
<v Speaker 1>a lot of services and a lot of money that

0:09:03.400 --> 0:09:05.520
<v Speaker 1>may need to be laid out and it's it's obviously

0:09:05.600 --> 0:09:10.800
<v Speaker 1>not ideal in this inflationary environment. Mark, what is Apple's

0:09:11.640 --> 0:09:15.280
<v Speaker 1>play here? What is their strategy with sports more broadly,

0:09:15.280 --> 0:09:18.440
<v Speaker 1>because it's not just baseball. So you heard that problem,

0:09:18.440 --> 0:09:20.800
<v Speaker 1>the brandon outline where you need four different services to

0:09:20.840 --> 0:09:24.800
<v Speaker 1>catch all your Nikee Games? Right, that's not alone for MLB. Right,

0:09:24.840 --> 0:09:27.720
<v Speaker 1>I'm an NBA Fan. Sometimes you need lead pass. Sometimes

0:09:27.760 --> 0:09:30.360
<v Speaker 1>for the Lakers you need spectrum sports net, sometimes you

0:09:30.400 --> 0:09:33.800
<v Speaker 1>need ESPN. Right. And so apple's ideal world is you

0:09:33.840 --> 0:09:36.160
<v Speaker 1>throw all that away, right, you subscribe for one price

0:09:36.160 --> 0:09:38.679
<v Speaker 1>every month and you get every game you want across

0:09:38.760 --> 0:09:41.719
<v Speaker 1>every different sports league and they're gradually heading there. Right

0:09:41.760 --> 0:09:44.880
<v Speaker 1>this MLB partnership just the beginning. You mentioned the talks

0:09:44.880 --> 0:09:47.640
<v Speaker 1>to the NFL for Sunday ticket, just the beginning. The

0:09:47.760 --> 0:09:50.240
<v Speaker 1>MLS deal. It's a ten year deal. That's a component

0:09:50.240 --> 0:09:53.280
<v Speaker 1>of it. I think they'll eventually go after the NBA, college,

0:09:53.559 --> 0:09:56.600
<v Speaker 1>Maybe High School Sports, who knows? They want everything. They

0:09:56.640 --> 0:09:59.319
<v Speaker 1>want one single monthly price. Build your own all the

0:09:59.400 --> 0:10:01.920
<v Speaker 1>card system them where you can pay, you know, x

0:10:01.960 --> 0:10:05.560
<v Speaker 1>amount for M MLB, NBA, NFL. Pay a different price

0:10:05.600 --> 0:10:08.960
<v Speaker 1>for this. Build your own packages as standalone apple originals,

0:10:08.960 --> 0:10:12.280
<v Speaker 1>non sports package. They want to own everything right and

0:10:12.280 --> 0:10:14.319
<v Speaker 1>this has been a big week for them. Those talks

0:10:14.320 --> 0:10:17.400
<v Speaker 1>are ongoing. You mentioned that deal for about fifty million

0:10:17.679 --> 0:10:20.280
<v Speaker 1>where they're going to be replacing Pepsi right as a

0:10:20.320 --> 0:10:23.959
<v Speaker 1>sponsor for the, you know, halftime game right at the

0:10:24.000 --> 0:10:26.720
<v Speaker 1>Super Bowl. That's a big way to get apple's brand

0:10:26.720 --> 0:10:29.360
<v Speaker 1>out there, make more sports fans familiar with the apple brand,

0:10:29.559 --> 0:10:32.920
<v Speaker 1>apple music, apple TV, etcetera. And of course the situation

0:10:32.920 --> 0:10:35.199
<v Speaker 1>that brandon outline tonight. That's going to get the apple

0:10:35.280 --> 0:10:38.679
<v Speaker 1>name out there for a lot more people. And obviously

0:10:38.720 --> 0:10:41.719
<v Speaker 1>this Aeron Joe Situation is perfect marketing for apple and

0:10:41.760 --> 0:10:44.400
<v Speaker 1>apples are going to give in and let yes, Co

0:10:44.600 --> 0:10:47.240
<v Speaker 1>stream the game, that chart you see on your screen.

0:10:47.280 --> 0:10:50.760
<v Speaker 1>So a global audience seems so important, right. Apple's budget

0:10:50.800 --> 0:10:56.160
<v Speaker 1>six billion for streaming in prime video, fifteen billion brandon.

0:10:56.280 --> 0:11:01.560
<v Speaker 1>Isn't just inevitable the Apple Amazon streaming giants come to

0:11:01.640 --> 0:11:06.240
<v Speaker 1>dominate sports television? Absolutely. I mean, when you think about

0:11:06.280 --> 0:11:10.000
<v Speaker 1>who owns all these products, who owns an apple product?

0:11:10.080 --> 0:11:12.640
<v Speaker 1>Who owns a subscription to Amazon prime, you're talking about

0:11:12.640 --> 0:11:14.560
<v Speaker 1>a lot of people, with tens of millions of people,

0:11:14.960 --> 0:11:17.640
<v Speaker 1>and all of these people are also motivated by more

0:11:17.800 --> 0:11:20.760
<v Speaker 1>and more quality content, turning to streaming, turning off from

0:11:20.800 --> 0:11:23.400
<v Speaker 1>cable and just focusing all their attention and their money there.

0:11:23.679 --> 0:11:27.680
<v Speaker 1>So it is inevitable. Let's talk about apple mark and

0:11:27.720 --> 0:11:31.360
<v Speaker 1>its efforts around the NFL and halftime show for the

0:11:31.400 --> 0:11:34.680
<v Speaker 1>Super Bowl. Right. This is not a play for the broadcasting,

0:11:35.360 --> 0:11:39.200
<v Speaker 1>this is a play for advertising. This is a pure

0:11:39.200 --> 0:11:42.280
<v Speaker 1>advertising way, pure way to get their brand out there.

0:11:42.360 --> 0:11:45.240
<v Speaker 1>This is a five year deal. Obviously, anyone who watches

0:11:45.280 --> 0:11:47.560
<v Speaker 1>the Super Bowl knows that Pepsi has sponsored them for

0:11:47.600 --> 0:11:49.880
<v Speaker 1>many years now. Apple is going to be the forefront

0:11:49.920 --> 0:11:52.640
<v Speaker 1>of that and you can just probably imagine that Tim Cook,

0:11:53.080 --> 0:11:55.280
<v Speaker 1>Eddie Que, their head of services, you know, a lot

0:11:55.320 --> 0:11:57.080
<v Speaker 1>of their team will probably be there. You'll see them

0:11:57.120 --> 0:12:00.360
<v Speaker 1>on camera there. They'll see their brand plasted everywhere. They'll

0:12:00.360 --> 0:12:02.640
<v Speaker 1>make a whole big deal about it. I'm interested to

0:12:02.640 --> 0:12:04.040
<v Speaker 1>see if they're going to get back in the game

0:12:04.040 --> 0:12:07.080
<v Speaker 1>of making commercials right for the Super Bowl, something they

0:12:07.080 --> 0:12:10.440
<v Speaker 1>did many, many years ago, obviously with the original MC

0:12:10.720 --> 0:12:12.559
<v Speaker 1>but they haven't really done much of that since then.

0:12:12.960 --> 0:12:15.400
<v Speaker 1>So I think this is a big branding opportunity for apple.

0:12:15.480 --> 0:12:17.960
<v Speaker 1>And despite all the cash they have on hand right

0:12:18.200 --> 0:12:21.240
<v Speaker 1>a hundred billion plus. You know, fifty million dollars still

0:12:21.240 --> 0:12:23.760
<v Speaker 1>fifty million dollars. So I think they see this as

0:12:23.880 --> 0:12:26.280
<v Speaker 1>a significant way to put their foot down and say hey,

0:12:26.280 --> 0:12:29.000
<v Speaker 1>we're here too for sports. Uh. And I think Brandon's

0:12:29.040 --> 0:12:31.760
<v Speaker 1>point about all these other services is also pretty interesting.

0:12:32.240 --> 0:12:34.280
<v Speaker 1>And what's really cool about Apple TV is they have

0:12:34.320 --> 0:12:37.079
<v Speaker 1>a feature called Apple TV channels. Right, so, let's say

0:12:37.120 --> 0:12:41.040
<v Speaker 1>Amazon or another provider, Peacock Brandon mentioned, they get some

0:12:41.280 --> 0:12:44.480
<v Speaker 1>really cool deal with one of the major sports leagues. Potentially,

0:12:44.480 --> 0:12:47.000
<v Speaker 1>maybe that could be tapped through in Apple TV. So

0:12:47.040 --> 0:12:49.600
<v Speaker 1>the Apple TV APP you can access to apple services,

0:12:49.640 --> 0:12:53.079
<v Speaker 1>apple partnerships, but maybe those from NBC and Amazon and

0:12:53.120 --> 0:12:55.600
<v Speaker 1>the likes of those as well. Mark, you've got your

0:12:55.600 --> 0:12:57.440
<v Speaker 1>finger on the Pulic of Apple, not just in the

0:12:57.480 --> 0:13:00.600
<v Speaker 1>product perspective, but it kind of brewed a strategy. So

0:13:00.679 --> 0:13:03.839
<v Speaker 1>talk to me about Sunday ticket in NFL. Is Tim

0:13:03.920 --> 0:13:07.320
<v Speaker 1>Cook and Co really willing to just keep spending that

0:13:07.400 --> 0:13:11.160
<v Speaker 1>cash because they got cash to burn? They have a

0:13:11.200 --> 0:13:13.199
<v Speaker 1>lot of cash and they want to use that cash

0:13:13.240 --> 0:13:15.400
<v Speaker 1>to make even more cash, right and so right now

0:13:15.440 --> 0:13:18.959
<v Speaker 1>they're making about twenty billion dollars a quarter right on services,

0:13:19.080 --> 0:13:22.839
<v Speaker 1>about eighty billion dollars per year. Imagine that investment, that

0:13:22.920 --> 0:13:25.240
<v Speaker 1>two and a half billion dollar investment, what that will

0:13:25.280 --> 0:13:27.920
<v Speaker 1>do for apple's bottom line. Right. Maybe one day we'll

0:13:27.960 --> 0:13:32.000
<v Speaker 1>be talking about nine billion or hundred billion dollar annual

0:13:32.040 --> 0:13:35.199
<v Speaker 1>income from services, with NFL just the beginning of that.

0:13:35.200 --> 0:13:37.360
<v Speaker 1>That's a big deal. And, as we all know, NFL

0:13:37.400 --> 0:13:39.920
<v Speaker 1>Sunday games. That's the Holy Grail, not only of the

0:13:40.080 --> 0:13:42.880
<v Speaker 1>NFL for football, but the holy grail of all of sports.

0:13:43.160 --> 0:13:45.760
<v Speaker 1>Right even the NBA doesn't want to broadcast their games

0:13:45.960 --> 0:13:48.560
<v Speaker 1>to go up against Sunday games from the NFL. So

0:13:48.640 --> 0:13:51.320
<v Speaker 1>I think that would be pretty, pretty big for the company. Hey,

0:13:51.360 --> 0:13:54.280
<v Speaker 1>how often does it come down to cash on cash,

0:13:54.880 --> 0:13:58.199
<v Speaker 1>on cash? Boom bugs, malt gum and and Brandon Sapienza.

0:13:58.640 --> 0:14:00.520
<v Speaker 1>Thanks to you both, and be sure order to catch

0:14:00.600 --> 0:14:03.319
<v Speaker 1>the lineup tonight at seven pm New York time. It's

0:14:03.320 --> 0:14:06.760
<v Speaker 1>our new show focused on the sports betting industry. Tonight,

0:14:06.800 --> 0:14:10.880
<v Speaker 1>former Dallas Cowboys Dez Bryant joins the program coming up,

0:14:10.880 --> 0:14:13.640
<v Speaker 1>we'll take a look at the resurgence in climate focused

0:14:13.679 --> 0:14:17.720
<v Speaker 1>investing as companies and governments doubled down on lightening their

0:14:17.720 --> 0:14:22.320
<v Speaker 1>carbon footprints. Our discussion with climate focus firm voyage a ventures. Next,

0:14:22.760 --> 0:14:39.960
<v Speaker 1>this is Bloomberg. This Week is climate week in New York,

0:14:39.960 --> 0:14:43.200
<v Speaker 1>with the summit bringing together international leaders from business, government

0:14:43.240 --> 0:14:47.240
<v Speaker 1>and civil society to showcase global climate action. So let's

0:14:47.240 --> 0:14:49.720
<v Speaker 1>wrap the week up with voyage adventures, a new firm

0:14:49.760 --> 0:14:52.080
<v Speaker 1>that's raised a hundred million dollars for its first fund,

0:14:52.120 --> 0:14:56.880
<v Speaker 1>backing tech startups working on things like decarbonizing transportation, energy

0:14:56.960 --> 0:15:00.840
<v Speaker 1>systems and foods and materials production, to own name a few.

0:15:00.920 --> 0:15:03.360
<v Speaker 1>Let's say all about this with the CO founders and

0:15:03.360 --> 0:15:07.400
<v Speaker 1>managing partners, Sierra Peterson and Sarah's classic, joining me now.

0:15:07.800 --> 0:15:11.120
<v Speaker 1>Sarah I'll start with you. Climate Week. A whole week

0:15:11.240 --> 0:15:17.200
<v Speaker 1>the world is watching to events like this really induced change. Yeah,

0:15:17.280 --> 0:15:20.040
<v Speaker 1>I mean climate week is, I think, a good illustration

0:15:20.120 --> 0:15:23.480
<v Speaker 1>of the unparalleled momentum we've seen in this past year

0:15:24.000 --> 0:15:28.160
<v Speaker 1>in recognizing the opportunity in addressing climate change and climate

0:15:28.160 --> 0:15:32.400
<v Speaker 1>stabilization through investment and the policy that has shown up

0:15:32.400 --> 0:15:34.840
<v Speaker 1>in a major way in the United States to do so.

0:15:34.840 --> 0:15:38.160
<v Speaker 1>So every week it's climate week in some way. Sarah,

0:15:38.200 --> 0:15:41.240
<v Speaker 1>I think what I find so fascinating, especially in private markets,

0:15:41.280 --> 0:15:45.000
<v Speaker 1>venture capital, you're putting money in a portfolio of companies.

0:15:45.000 --> 0:15:46.880
<v Speaker 1>Some of them will make it, some of them won't,

0:15:47.200 --> 0:15:49.080
<v Speaker 1>and a lot of these ideas they always seem a

0:15:49.080 --> 0:15:52.640
<v Speaker 1>bit nascent, right. They always seem like things with great promise.

0:15:52.720 --> 0:15:57.800
<v Speaker 1>How do you decide to where you deploy capital? Yeah,

0:15:57.800 --> 0:16:00.840
<v Speaker 1>so we invest in companies building product and services that

0:16:00.920 --> 0:16:04.240
<v Speaker 1>are positioned to decarbonize some aspect of the global economy.

0:16:04.640 --> 0:16:07.880
<v Speaker 1>And these are the world's biggest markets for talking about energy,

0:16:08.000 --> 0:16:12.000
<v Speaker 1>food and materials, production, transportation. And what we recognized, and

0:16:12.080 --> 0:16:14.520
<v Speaker 1>part of the reason that we started voyager now when

0:16:14.560 --> 0:16:19.280
<v Speaker 1>we did, is that many of these foundational technologies are

0:16:19.320 --> 0:16:22.880
<v Speaker 1>reaching the point where they are cheaper and better performing

0:16:22.920 --> 0:16:25.320
<v Speaker 1>than their fossil field incumbents. Sore, of course, seeing this

0:16:25.800 --> 0:16:27.840
<v Speaker 1>in the area of electric vehicles, where the total cost

0:16:27.840 --> 0:16:30.640
<v Speaker 1>of ownership of light duty vehicle is less than that

0:16:31.080 --> 0:16:33.680
<v Speaker 1>of a combustion engine vehicle and the performance is better.

0:16:34.080 --> 0:16:36.920
<v Speaker 1>And so we look for opportunities in these expanding markets

0:16:36.920 --> 0:16:43.360
<v Speaker 1>where foundational technologies are positioned to Outcompete, in the near term,

0:16:43.440 --> 0:16:45.880
<v Speaker 1>in the next few years or even today, their fossil

0:16:45.920 --> 0:16:48.920
<v Speaker 1>field incumbents. And I think it's important to recognize these

0:16:48.920 --> 0:16:54.040
<v Speaker 1>technologies will continue to get better over time and the

0:16:54.080 --> 0:16:57.320
<v Speaker 1>fossil fuel based incumbents will continue to be ever more

0:16:57.400 --> 0:17:00.320
<v Speaker 1>or less competitive. Sarah, let me as see that question

0:17:00.360 --> 0:17:04.159
<v Speaker 1>in reverse. Where are you not investing? Where do you

0:17:04.240 --> 0:17:10.160
<v Speaker 1>not put your money within climate carbon reduction? And why? Yeah,

0:17:10.200 --> 0:17:13.960
<v Speaker 1>certainly so. We are an early stage venture capital firm.

0:17:14.040 --> 0:17:17.439
<v Speaker 1>So as a venture capital firm, we seek investments that

0:17:17.560 --> 0:17:21.560
<v Speaker 1>have a venture scale return profile. There are plenty of

0:17:21.600 --> 0:17:26.040
<v Speaker 1>opportunities for investing in the overall transition away from an

0:17:26.080 --> 0:17:31.400
<v Speaker 1>unsustainable and carbon intensive economy around the world. There are

0:17:31.480 --> 0:17:36.280
<v Speaker 1>infrastructure investments to be made. There are certainly interesting opportunities

0:17:36.320 --> 0:17:39.280
<v Speaker 1>to invest in the carbon markets themselves. We are investing

0:17:39.280 --> 0:17:43.080
<v Speaker 1>in early stage technology companies that hold, as I said,

0:17:43.480 --> 0:17:47.000
<v Speaker 1>an interesting and venture scale return profile. Out of fund one,

0:17:47.080 --> 0:17:50.240
<v Speaker 1>for example, we look for companies that we believe, through

0:17:50.280 --> 0:17:52.920
<v Speaker 1>a single investment, can return the entire hundred million dollar

0:17:53.000 --> 0:17:57.520
<v Speaker 1>fund through that investment. So you both raise around hundred

0:17:57.520 --> 0:18:00.600
<v Speaker 1>million in April, I believe. I want just take a

0:18:00.640 --> 0:18:03.800
<v Speaker 1>look on the screen at some of those backing you guys,

0:18:03.840 --> 0:18:09.280
<v Speaker 1>some of your lps, really interesting names from industry, for example.

0:18:09.600 --> 0:18:12.000
<v Speaker 1>You know one being Jeff M Ol of GE, Long

0:18:12.119 --> 0:18:16.240
<v Speaker 1>Time at G, one of these great big American companies,

0:18:16.440 --> 0:18:18.560
<v Speaker 1>and we talked in the intro about how climate week

0:18:18.840 --> 0:18:24.000
<v Speaker 1>brings together policymakers business. When you look across corporate America

0:18:24.240 --> 0:18:27.240
<v Speaker 1>at a General Electric for example, do you think that

0:18:27.280 --> 0:18:31.399
<v Speaker 1>they are a doing enough, Sarah, but be doing the

0:18:31.520 --> 0:18:38.080
<v Speaker 1>right things with their investment? Yeah, many companies are recognizing

0:18:38.119 --> 0:18:41.120
<v Speaker 1>the opportunity in the transition and they're seizing the opportunity.

0:18:41.280 --> 0:18:45.679
<v Speaker 1>I think certainly not every company is and all companies

0:18:45.720 --> 0:18:48.960
<v Speaker 1>could be doing more. What it's difficult to recognize is

0:18:49.000 --> 0:18:52.520
<v Speaker 1>that once technology is hit in flection points where they

0:18:52.600 --> 0:18:56.399
<v Speaker 1>are better performing and less expensive than the technology paradigm

0:18:56.440 --> 0:18:59.320
<v Speaker 1>they're replacing, they continue to get better and they can

0:18:59.359 --> 0:19:01.720
<v Speaker 1>continue to get are at a faster rate, and so

0:19:01.800 --> 0:19:05.480
<v Speaker 1>we think these transitions will happen linearly. In reality, they

0:19:05.520 --> 0:19:08.159
<v Speaker 1>actually can happen much, much faster than that, and so

0:19:08.320 --> 0:19:11.240
<v Speaker 1>timelines and inflection points that feel like they might be

0:19:11.320 --> 0:19:15.840
<v Speaker 1>twenty years out in decarbonization, in the transition from combustion

0:19:16.000 --> 0:19:19.920
<v Speaker 1>to clean electricity, might actually be happening in ten years

0:19:20.000 --> 0:19:23.080
<v Speaker 1>or five years. And corporations that don't prepare for that

0:19:23.680 --> 0:19:26.639
<v Speaker 1>UH and then, are not ready for what is potentially

0:19:26.680 --> 0:19:29.879
<v Speaker 1>the most rapid transition of economic activity the world has

0:19:29.880 --> 0:19:32.080
<v Speaker 1>ever seen, are not only going to be at risk

0:19:32.160 --> 0:19:33.840
<v Speaker 1>for their business, but they're also going to miss out

0:19:33.920 --> 0:19:36.840
<v Speaker 1>on a fifty trillion dollar opportunity. Sarah, it's been a

0:19:36.840 --> 0:19:40.480
<v Speaker 1>really interestingly digging into the actual technologies, the things that

0:19:41.000 --> 0:19:43.960
<v Speaker 1>the founders are trying to improve. Talk to me about

0:19:44.000 --> 0:19:46.840
<v Speaker 1>some of your portfolio companies, the areas and the technologies

0:19:46.840 --> 0:19:50.639
<v Speaker 1>that you're most excited about. Yeah, so we invest in

0:19:50.840 --> 0:19:55.000
<v Speaker 1>foundational decarbonization, that is, the technologies that are poised to

0:19:55.040 --> 0:19:59.680
<v Speaker 1>de carbonized big swaws to the global economy. These are mobility,

0:20:00.320 --> 0:20:05.560
<v Speaker 1>energy itself, food materials production, the built environment. We are

0:20:05.640 --> 0:20:09.840
<v Speaker 1>backing companies that are poised to, should they succeed in

0:20:09.880 --> 0:20:13.639
<v Speaker 1>these markets, really address emissions at scale across the global economy,

0:20:13.680 --> 0:20:17.360
<v Speaker 1>and I put fully reflects that. We invest in software companies,

0:20:17.480 --> 0:20:21.359
<v Speaker 1>we invest in deep technology companies, we invest in biotechnology

0:20:21.400 --> 0:20:25.639
<v Speaker 1>companies and all our positioned to compete with the fast

0:20:25.760 --> 0:20:30.960
<v Speaker 1>field paradigms of prior technology based on price and performance,

0:20:31.000 --> 0:20:35.280
<v Speaker 1>belong right. Voyager Co founders and managing partners, Sierra Peterson

0:20:35.600 --> 0:20:39.439
<v Speaker 1>and Sarah's classic. Thank you very much. Now Nicola, founded

0:20:39.480 --> 0:20:42.520
<v Speaker 1>Trevor Milton, had an odd reaction when shares plummeted on

0:20:42.560 --> 0:20:46.760
<v Speaker 1>their NASDAC debut. Back in Milton was, quote, hyper focused

0:20:46.760 --> 0:20:48.880
<v Speaker 1>on the company's stock price, so much so that when

0:20:48.920 --> 0:20:52.760
<v Speaker 1>the shares fell five on their first trading day of June,

0:20:52.840 --> 0:20:55.480
<v Speaker 1>he thought something was wrong with the NASDAK. Durors his

0:20:55.560 --> 0:20:59.280
<v Speaker 1>criminal fraud trial were told CFO can brady testified that

0:20:59.359 --> 0:21:03.440
<v Speaker 1>he explained to Milton the decline was simply supply and demand,

0:21:03.520 --> 0:21:07.440
<v Speaker 1>but Milton insisted brady contact the exchange. Brady told jurors

0:21:07.520 --> 0:21:10.080
<v Speaker 1>that it was a constant battle to get Milton, the

0:21:10.119 --> 0:21:13.359
<v Speaker 1>company's biggest shareholder, to focus on building long term value

0:21:13.480 --> 0:21:18.280
<v Speaker 1>rather than obsess over retail investors and stock price fluctuations.

0:21:18.960 --> 0:21:21.920
<v Speaker 1>And Ford has begun the largest factory project in its

0:21:21.920 --> 0:21:25.399
<v Speaker 1>one hundred and nineteen year history. The automaker has started

0:21:25.400 --> 0:21:28.840
<v Speaker 1>construction of its five point six billion dollar electric vehicle

0:21:28.920 --> 0:21:33.560
<v Speaker 1>manufacturing complex in western Tennessee. It's known as Blue Oval City.

0:21:33.600 --> 0:21:37.680
<v Speaker 1>By six thousand workers were expected to be building electric

0:21:37.720 --> 0:21:40.280
<v Speaker 1>pickup trucks and the batteries that power them in a

0:21:40.400 --> 0:21:52.920
<v Speaker 1>joint venture with South Korea's SK innovation. Now market loads

0:21:52.960 --> 0:21:55.199
<v Speaker 1>for the year are in sight after this week's sell off.

0:21:55.240 --> 0:21:58.000
<v Speaker 1>All three major indices dropped this week after the Fed

0:21:58.080 --> 0:22:01.760
<v Speaker 1>seventy five basis point hike and signaled higher rates will remain.

0:22:01.880 --> 0:22:05.440
<v Speaker 1>Tech was not spared. Our next guest says there could

0:22:05.440 --> 0:22:08.920
<v Speaker 1>be some bright spots along with challenges for everyone from

0:22:08.960 --> 0:22:12.960
<v Speaker 1>startup founders to chief executives. David Crawford is partner at

0:22:13.000 --> 0:22:16.440
<v Speaker 1>Bain and company as well as its global head of technology.

0:22:17.200 --> 0:22:19.280
<v Speaker 1>David the week that was what do you make of

0:22:19.320 --> 0:22:23.560
<v Speaker 1>what's going on in the world? Well, good question, I think. Um,

0:22:24.359 --> 0:22:27.520
<v Speaker 1>thanks for the question. I think we we see long term.

0:22:27.520 --> 0:22:30.000
<v Speaker 1>You know, Innovation and growth in the tech sector. That said,

0:22:30.640 --> 0:22:34.320
<v Speaker 1>we've already seen our clients swallow kind of equity and

0:22:34.960 --> 0:22:39.000
<v Speaker 1>reduction this year. That's mostly been multiple adjustment. The second

0:22:39.000 --> 0:22:41.639
<v Speaker 1>half of the year, we think, is actually about sorting

0:22:41.640 --> 0:22:44.760
<v Speaker 1>out how much demand pulls back. We we believe there

0:22:44.760 --> 0:22:47.720
<v Speaker 1>are major disruptions from supply chain as well as war

0:22:47.920 --> 0:22:50.879
<v Speaker 1>and now the recessionary effects of a demand pullback which,

0:22:50.960 --> 0:22:53.679
<v Speaker 1>as we look into our client base, we think that's

0:22:53.680 --> 0:22:55.560
<v Speaker 1>actually going to be revealed to be more substantial than

0:22:55.600 --> 0:22:59.760
<v Speaker 1>people think and surprise the markets more so. Volatility is

0:22:59.800 --> 0:23:02.920
<v Speaker 1>a US word again. The world is volatile, the markets

0:23:02.920 --> 0:23:06.919
<v Speaker 1>of volatile, but you see an opportunity to do what

0:23:07.000 --> 0:23:12.320
<v Speaker 1>you call kickstarting the rebuild. What do you mean by that?

0:23:14.000 --> 0:23:16.360
<v Speaker 1>What we talk about is that in a downturn there

0:23:16.440 --> 0:23:20.400
<v Speaker 1>is opportunity and particularly if you can be an incumbent

0:23:20.560 --> 0:23:23.520
<v Speaker 1>or someone who is strong in your sector, there's a

0:23:23.520 --> 0:23:26.560
<v Speaker 1>flight to quality. It creates more opportunities for you to grow.

0:23:26.760 --> 0:23:28.639
<v Speaker 1>It creates more opportunities for you to do m and a,

0:23:28.720 --> 0:23:31.600
<v Speaker 1>it creates more opportunities to do do deals. But there's

0:23:31.600 --> 0:23:33.919
<v Speaker 1>a process of managing through the downturn such that you

0:23:33.960 --> 0:23:37.240
<v Speaker 1>can gain share and gain market position. It's kind of

0:23:37.240 --> 0:23:39.080
<v Speaker 1>a double edged sword right were, especially when we talk

0:23:39.080 --> 0:23:42.639
<v Speaker 1>about growth equity, because a lot of these innovators they

0:23:42.640 --> 0:23:46.040
<v Speaker 1>need cash, they need money to to grow, to expand

0:23:46.040 --> 0:23:48.719
<v Speaker 1>what they're doing. But if you're an investor, that carries

0:23:48.840 --> 0:23:52.640
<v Speaker 1>risk in this environment. So how do you pass that? Yeah,

0:23:52.680 --> 0:23:56.520
<v Speaker 1>great question. We see growth equity as a direct result

0:23:56.560 --> 0:24:00.400
<v Speaker 1>of the unique innovative conditions in the tech sector today.

0:24:00.760 --> 0:24:02.719
<v Speaker 1>It turns out that the markets have put down, over

0:24:02.720 --> 0:24:07.120
<v Speaker 1>the last decade, enormous amounts of cloud computing, pervasive connectivity,

0:24:07.160 --> 0:24:09.639
<v Speaker 1>GPS infrastructure at center and it's created an environment in

0:24:09.640 --> 0:24:13.360
<v Speaker 1>which new companies can be built and scaled extremely rapidly.

0:24:13.840 --> 0:24:16.480
<v Speaker 1>And if you understand that playbook, you can invest behind

0:24:16.520 --> 0:24:19.640
<v Speaker 1>it with a growth equity formula that is extraordinarily high,

0:24:19.760 --> 0:24:23.960
<v Speaker 1>high payback Um. So I think that formula has not

0:24:24.040 --> 0:24:26.439
<v Speaker 1>gone away, those conditions have not gone away. We're going

0:24:26.480 --> 0:24:30.280
<v Speaker 1>to have to work through these uh, these uh difficult environment,

0:24:30.359 --> 0:24:32.000
<v Speaker 1>you know, in the next six to twelve months, but

0:24:32.040 --> 0:24:34.280
<v Speaker 1>after that I think we'll have a return of the

0:24:34.320 --> 0:24:37.480
<v Speaker 1>same extraordinary innovation conditions. David was showing a lot of

0:24:37.480 --> 0:24:39.840
<v Speaker 1>red on the screen on a year to date basis

0:24:39.840 --> 0:24:43.280
<v Speaker 1>and equity markets on a weekly basis. But it's Friday.

0:24:43.520 --> 0:24:46.679
<v Speaker 1>Let's let's think about the positive, the opportunity, and I

0:24:46.720 --> 0:24:49.960
<v Speaker 1>enjoyed your latest research right because you're talking about specific areas,

0:24:50.240 --> 0:24:52.800
<v Speaker 1>the role of web three in rewriting the rules of

0:24:52.920 --> 0:24:58.080
<v Speaker 1>digital user identity, you're excited about ai in customer success.

0:24:58.119 --> 0:25:01.840
<v Speaker 1>How do you convince invested that now is the time

0:25:02.320 --> 0:25:06.960
<v Speaker 1>to deploy capital to those areas? Yeah, I think it's

0:25:06.960 --> 0:25:11.000
<v Speaker 1>been interesting to watch equity multiple adjustments. The hardest hit

0:25:11.240 --> 0:25:14.159
<v Speaker 1>by far have been the smaller companies with the extraordinarily

0:25:14.240 --> 0:25:17.000
<v Speaker 1>high growth rates. There's been a flight to quality and

0:25:17.080 --> 0:25:21.200
<v Speaker 1>that just makes a number of extraordinarily innovative and important, frankly,

0:25:21.240 --> 0:25:24.480
<v Speaker 1>assets available at much cheaper prices than it would have

0:25:24.520 --> 0:25:28.720
<v Speaker 1>been otherwise. So I guess we would say innovation is

0:25:28.800 --> 0:25:31.800
<v Speaker 1>very much alive. We're looking down the barrel of a

0:25:31.840 --> 0:25:34.680
<v Speaker 1>massive growth in the metaverse, web three dot o being

0:25:34.920 --> 0:25:38.400
<v Speaker 1>one piece of that Um, and we just think that

0:25:38.920 --> 0:25:43.080
<v Speaker 1>this transitional effect creates opportunities for smart players to make

0:25:43.119 --> 0:25:45.359
<v Speaker 1>good bets. David, I'm going to bring up a chart

0:25:45.400 --> 0:25:49.520
<v Speaker 1>which I saw in your research which shows the growth

0:25:49.640 --> 0:25:54.800
<v Speaker 1>of growth equity relative to public markets, equity venture capital,

0:25:55.560 --> 0:25:58.320
<v Speaker 1>and what we see in terms of buyouts in the market.

0:25:59.119 --> 0:26:02.199
<v Speaker 1>What is this story that this chart is telling on

0:26:02.240 --> 0:26:07.000
<v Speaker 1>our screens? Yeah, great question. The basic story there is

0:26:07.080 --> 0:26:12.719
<v Speaker 1>the extraordinary growth of the growth equity investor trunch, you know,

0:26:12.960 --> 0:26:16.080
<v Speaker 1>and growth equity is not a new concept, but it's

0:26:16.080 --> 0:26:19.160
<v Speaker 1>it's meant to be targeted at a life stage that

0:26:19.320 --> 0:26:22.399
<v Speaker 1>you know, is going from, uh, you know, stability to

0:26:22.600 --> 0:26:26.240
<v Speaker 1>scale and, as I mentioned before, we just think it

0:26:26.320 --> 0:26:30.000
<v Speaker 1>reflects the growth here. Has Grown to of total capital deployed.

0:26:30.000 --> 0:26:33.160
<v Speaker 1>That's extraordinary. It's doubled since the last two years. So

0:26:33.760 --> 0:26:38.119
<v Speaker 1>we just think it reflects the conditions of innovation that

0:26:38.240 --> 0:26:42.720
<v Speaker 1>are ever present in tech right now. The pervasive availability

0:26:43.000 --> 0:26:50.080
<v Speaker 1>of cloud computing, of Um connectivity, of Ai, of technologies,

0:26:50.119 --> 0:26:54.000
<v Speaker 1>payment systems, you name it, just allows a good concept

0:26:54.119 --> 0:26:58.680
<v Speaker 1>to be created and scaled extremely rapidly and investors have

0:26:58.760 --> 0:27:01.320
<v Speaker 1>sort of bad out. They've actually that into a great business.

0:27:01.960 --> 0:27:04.199
<v Speaker 1>If you're an investor anywhere in the world in the

0:27:04.280 --> 0:27:07.159
<v Speaker 1>last two years you've done a bit of reading about

0:27:07.240 --> 0:27:11.520
<v Speaker 1>semiconductors and the global chip industry. Everyone is trying to

0:27:11.560 --> 0:27:14.600
<v Speaker 1>become an expert on the chip industry. Where do you

0:27:14.760 --> 0:27:19.359
<v Speaker 1>see the health of the chip industry in terms of supply,

0:27:19.480 --> 0:27:22.080
<v Speaker 1>bottle Max, but but also the story has turned so

0:27:22.200 --> 0:27:27.840
<v Speaker 1>quickly to demand. Yeah, the chips story is is a

0:27:27.920 --> 0:27:31.120
<v Speaker 1>multifaceted one. It's started out two and a half years

0:27:31.160 --> 0:27:34.719
<v Speaker 1>ago with the auto industry canceling is, its its orders

0:27:34.720 --> 0:27:38.359
<v Speaker 1>and those orders being reallocated to keep factories full. Um,

0:27:38.440 --> 0:27:41.640
<v Speaker 1>when the economy recovered more quickly than people thought, there

0:27:41.720 --> 0:27:45.200
<v Speaker 1>was just no availability because the factories protect themselves by backfilling.

0:27:45.760 --> 0:27:49.080
<v Speaker 1>Since then it's become, you know, an extraordinary story of

0:27:49.160 --> 0:27:56.480
<v Speaker 1>global disruption that occurs as, uh, individual players lose their orders, underproduced, overproduced, etcetera,

0:27:56.560 --> 0:27:59.600
<v Speaker 1>and it shows us that how dependent we really are

0:27:59.680 --> 0:28:01.879
<v Speaker 1>on hips. And it's not just leading edge chips, it's

0:28:01.960 --> 0:28:05.879
<v Speaker 1>chips at all Um at all places within in the

0:28:05.880 --> 0:28:09.400
<v Speaker 1>node progression of the fabrication and that is also, of course,

0:28:09.440 --> 0:28:12.639
<v Speaker 1>shone a light on the relationship between the United States

0:28:12.640 --> 0:28:14.600
<v Speaker 1>and China, and I know that your research is touched

0:28:14.600 --> 0:28:17.280
<v Speaker 1>on that as well. Yeah, there's a whole another layer

0:28:17.280 --> 0:28:19.560
<v Speaker 1>to this story, which is that, you know, the world

0:28:19.600 --> 0:28:22.600
<v Speaker 1>has found itself extremely dependent on a small number of

0:28:22.680 --> 0:28:24.920
<v Speaker 1>companies to produce these some of which, one of which

0:28:25.119 --> 0:28:28.560
<v Speaker 1>is very important, is Taiwan. Semiconductor in Taiwan and to

0:28:28.640 --> 0:28:31.600
<v Speaker 1>the extent Um there's a single point of failure in

0:28:31.600 --> 0:28:35.160
<v Speaker 1>your supply chain. Uh. This chip shortage has really highlighted

0:28:35.200 --> 0:28:39.440
<v Speaker 1>for folks how how dependent they really are on that

0:28:39.560 --> 0:28:42.680
<v Speaker 1>single company, and many companies are looking to diverse five.

0:28:43.360 --> 0:28:46.680
<v Speaker 1>With all that in mind, give me the David Crawford

0:28:46.680 --> 0:28:53.000
<v Speaker 1>projection for three in the world of tech. Yeah, simple,

0:28:53.680 --> 0:28:55.520
<v Speaker 1>in any of the back end of three will be

0:28:55.560 --> 0:28:58.360
<v Speaker 1>about innovation and Growth and and sorting out how to

0:28:58.360 --> 0:29:01.080
<v Speaker 1>win here. I think the next six to eight months

0:29:01.080 --> 0:29:05.680
<v Speaker 1>will be working through the disruptions that we're experiencing now, Um,

0:29:05.680 --> 0:29:08.880
<v Speaker 1>and those include everything from the Geo political environment too,

0:29:08.960 --> 0:29:11.320
<v Speaker 1>as you describe the supply chain shortages, one of which

0:29:11.400 --> 0:29:15.520
<v Speaker 1>is the chip shortage, Um, as well as the recessionary

0:29:15.520 --> 0:29:18.719
<v Speaker 1>effect of demand pulled back. All Right, David Crawford, partner

0:29:18.760 --> 0:29:22.000
<v Speaker 1>at Bain and company and head of its global technology practice.

0:29:22.040 --> 0:29:36.320
<v Speaker 1>Thank you. Time for our crypts I report, and today

0:29:36.520 --> 0:29:38.560
<v Speaker 1>we take a look at what we call oracles so

0:29:38.600 --> 0:29:42.000
<v Speaker 1>around crypto contribute to Shinali Bashak is here with our

0:29:42.040 --> 0:29:44.280
<v Speaker 1>guest Shal take it away. Thank you, ed. We're going

0:29:44.320 --> 0:29:46.640
<v Speaker 1>to talk to Mike K Hill. He's the Pith Data

0:29:46.760 --> 0:29:50.560
<v Speaker 1>Association director, and we're going to talk about oracles here,

0:29:50.600 --> 0:29:54.320
<v Speaker 1>because data is hard to combine the traditional financial system.

0:29:54.360 --> 0:29:56.400
<v Speaker 1>It's hard to combine in crypto because it's such a

0:29:56.480 --> 0:30:00.120
<v Speaker 1>vast landscape. So when we're talking about Oracles, what do

0:30:00.160 --> 0:30:02.800
<v Speaker 1>you really mean and what does it mean for the

0:30:02.880 --> 0:30:06.400
<v Speaker 1>universe of smart contracts that need that external data from

0:30:06.760 --> 0:30:10.840
<v Speaker 1>the real world services that really provide that gateway Um,

0:30:10.880 --> 0:30:14.160
<v Speaker 1>to each other? Sure, first out, thanks so much for

0:30:14.200 --> 0:30:17.680
<v Speaker 1>having me. On block chains, as you mentioned, we've got

0:30:17.720 --> 0:30:22.600
<v Speaker 1>smart contracts and the smart contracts will execute rules based

0:30:23.400 --> 0:30:26.560
<v Speaker 1>decision criteria that can move something of value. So it

0:30:26.560 --> 0:30:29.960
<v Speaker 1>could be bitcoins, it could be ethereum Um, and when

0:30:29.960 --> 0:30:32.640
<v Speaker 1>they are doing this, there's no third party intermediary that's

0:30:32.680 --> 0:30:35.320
<v Speaker 1>going to make any judgment calls. So they're dependent upon

0:30:35.640 --> 0:30:38.680
<v Speaker 1>the inputs and that inputs come from data Um, and

0:30:38.760 --> 0:30:42.160
<v Speaker 1>so that data is that the quality of that data

0:30:42.200 --> 0:30:46.520
<v Speaker 1>is paramount, and so oracle networks provide a way to

0:30:46.600 --> 0:30:49.520
<v Speaker 1>get high quality data. It's very trustworthy, and the way

0:30:49.520 --> 0:30:53.160
<v Speaker 1>that they do that is by having multiple contributors distribute

0:30:53.160 --> 0:30:55.760
<v Speaker 1>that data directly on chain and it becomes very robust

0:30:55.840 --> 0:30:59.880
<v Speaker 1>and resilient. Now how does this really help big institution

0:31:00.000 --> 0:31:04.040
<v Speaker 1>and high frequency traders really engage with the crypto universe

0:31:04.120 --> 0:31:07.480
<v Speaker 1>with a lot more rigor? Yeah, so what's really cool

0:31:07.480 --> 0:31:10.320
<v Speaker 1>about the pith network is it has attracted some of

0:31:10.320 --> 0:31:13.600
<v Speaker 1>the largest trading firms and exchanges to contribute their data

0:31:13.640 --> 0:31:17.240
<v Speaker 1>directly onto blockchain. We think about the pith network as

0:31:17.320 --> 0:31:21.400
<v Speaker 1>being really high quality infrastructure that can power the next

0:31:21.440 --> 0:31:25.840
<v Speaker 1>generation of decentralized applications empower the growth of web three.

0:31:26.240 --> 0:31:29.400
<v Speaker 1>So it's really the tooling that large trading firms and

0:31:29.440 --> 0:31:33.560
<v Speaker 1>exchanges come to expect to make this institutional grade so

0:31:33.600 --> 0:31:36.720
<v Speaker 1>that they can participate in future. You know, it's interesting

0:31:36.760 --> 0:31:38.680
<v Speaker 1>because when you think about how it used to work,

0:31:38.880 --> 0:31:43.000
<v Speaker 1>data is proprietary. Data is something that not a lot

0:31:43.000 --> 0:31:45.560
<v Speaker 1>of people like to traditionally share. So what do these

0:31:45.600 --> 0:31:48.160
<v Speaker 1>firms get out of it by starting to share data

0:31:48.200 --> 0:31:52.560
<v Speaker 1>and starting to amass more data altogether? That's a great question.

0:31:52.680 --> 0:31:55.600
<v Speaker 1>So there's a reward mechanism within the pith network where

0:31:55.840 --> 0:31:59.440
<v Speaker 1>the data providers are incentivized to provide that data on

0:31:59.560 --> 0:32:02.920
<v Speaker 1>chain Um. And what has been very exciting is, in

0:32:02.960 --> 0:32:06.880
<v Speaker 1>a similar capacity to how AIRBNB has enabled an entire

0:32:06.960 --> 0:32:11.680
<v Speaker 1>new inventory of places to stay. The Pith Network has

0:32:11.840 --> 0:32:15.880
<v Speaker 1>opened up and unlocked reserves of data that came from

0:32:15.880 --> 0:32:19.800
<v Speaker 1>trading firms that never ever distributed it for external use before. Um.

0:32:19.840 --> 0:32:23.280
<v Speaker 1>Some of the participants include jump trading, Jane Street Susquehanna,

0:32:23.560 --> 0:32:25.640
<v Speaker 1>and they're contributing their data directly on Shane and this

0:32:25.720 --> 0:32:28.800
<v Speaker 1>is something they've never once have used externally before. So

0:32:28.840 --> 0:32:31.160
<v Speaker 1>it's very cool. Mike, you used to work at Morgan

0:32:31.240 --> 0:32:33.200
<v Speaker 1>Stanley and you know, when you look at this kind

0:32:33.200 --> 0:32:35.640
<v Speaker 1>of high frequency trading world, all those companies that you

0:32:35.720 --> 0:32:39.080
<v Speaker 1>said that you work with, like Jane Street Susquehannah, why

0:32:39.240 --> 0:32:42.760
<v Speaker 1>is it that high frequency trading firms are more likely

0:32:42.840 --> 0:32:46.120
<v Speaker 1>to engage with this universe then a large firm like

0:32:46.280 --> 0:32:49.040
<v Speaker 1>Morgan Stanley? You see some of those big houses starting

0:32:49.080 --> 0:32:52.840
<v Speaker 1>to trade in Crypto, but it's really at the margins. Yeah,

0:32:52.880 --> 0:32:55.000
<v Speaker 1>I agree. I think that the first movers tend to

0:32:55.040 --> 0:32:59.800
<v Speaker 1>be ones that have um smaller committees around where they

0:32:59.800 --> 0:33:02.920
<v Speaker 1>can enter into markets. Um. So these are really the

0:33:03.000 --> 0:33:06.280
<v Speaker 1>nimble firms, Um, the ones that get in early. They're

0:33:06.320 --> 0:33:09.640
<v Speaker 1>comfortable with both the cryptography risk as well as potentially

0:33:09.640 --> 0:33:12.960
<v Speaker 1>some regulatory risks. Um, and then navigating that landscape is

0:33:13.000 --> 0:33:15.080
<v Speaker 1>never easy, but it's a calculated risk that they have

0:33:15.160 --> 0:33:17.080
<v Speaker 1>to take. For the banks, I think that they need

0:33:17.120 --> 0:33:20.200
<v Speaker 1>to get a little bit more comfortable with the caliber

0:33:20.240 --> 0:33:21.800
<v Speaker 1>and the scale of risks that they're going to get

0:33:21.800 --> 0:33:23.480
<v Speaker 1>into and I think they're making a lot of progress,

0:33:23.480 --> 0:33:25.600
<v Speaker 1>as you mentioned Um, and we will expect to see

0:33:25.600 --> 0:33:27.360
<v Speaker 1>them come in over time. And what would it take,

0:33:27.600 --> 0:33:30.760
<v Speaker 1>do you think, for decentralized finance to do everything that

0:33:30.760 --> 0:33:34.640
<v Speaker 1>you would see in the traditional financial system? Yeah, I

0:33:34.640 --> 0:33:36.640
<v Speaker 1>think it's going to take a lot of development Um.

0:33:36.640 --> 0:33:40.160
<v Speaker 1>There's some things that crypto does really well, which is like,

0:33:40.320 --> 0:33:43.720
<v Speaker 1>you know, sending things around the world of value Um,

0:33:43.760 --> 0:33:46.920
<v Speaker 1>with low friction Um and low fees Um. And then

0:33:46.920 --> 0:33:50.000
<v Speaker 1>there's some things that in centralized finance it does really well,

0:33:50.080 --> 0:33:54.080
<v Speaker 1>for instance, privacy. Everything is fully public on on blockchains

0:33:54.080 --> 0:33:57.239
<v Speaker 1>and that's not necessarily the best thing for um like

0:33:57.280 --> 0:34:00.800
<v Speaker 1>a trading engine, or for Um to send like your

0:34:00.920 --> 0:34:03.360
<v Speaker 1>Benmo account and have everything to be public Um. So

0:34:03.400 --> 0:34:05.920
<v Speaker 1>I think that we're going to see better technology emerge

0:34:06.400 --> 0:34:10.880
<v Speaker 1>Um and this infrastructure tooling is really designed to allow

0:34:10.960 --> 0:34:14.520
<v Speaker 1>people to build stuff and build stuff that can compete

0:34:14.560 --> 0:34:16.520
<v Speaker 1>with the real world of centralized follow ups I'd love

0:34:16.520 --> 0:34:19.200
<v Speaker 1>for you to talk about your work also with certain blockchains,

0:34:19.239 --> 0:34:22.200
<v Speaker 1>particularly Salana. Of course we've come off the merge. We're

0:34:22.200 --> 0:34:25.719
<v Speaker 1>talking a little earlier this week down totally, Yakovenko, you know,

0:34:25.800 --> 0:34:28.000
<v Speaker 1>what is it? What kind of data do you have?

0:34:28.120 --> 0:34:31.480
<v Speaker 1>What kind of decisions are you making as this ecosystem

0:34:31.560 --> 0:34:36.240
<v Speaker 1>evolves to know what's going to be more dominant moving forward? Yeah,

0:34:36.600 --> 0:34:39.000
<v Speaker 1>so pith started its life about a year ago on

0:34:39.440 --> 0:34:43.719
<v Speaker 1>the Salanta blockchain and it became very quickly the canonical

0:34:43.880 --> 0:34:47.840
<v Speaker 1>oracle to be used on chain over the applications or

0:34:47.880 --> 0:34:51.640
<v Speaker 1>securing their data with that network. Um, and it is

0:34:51.640 --> 0:34:54.640
<v Speaker 1>now going multi chain and it's really just if you

0:34:54.640 --> 0:34:58.440
<v Speaker 1>think about these chains being similar to operating systems, you

0:34:58.480 --> 0:35:01.440
<v Speaker 1>want to have the best possible toolings to attract users

0:35:01.440 --> 0:35:04.279
<v Speaker 1>to build applications on these operating systems, Um, and so

0:35:04.400 --> 0:35:07.759
<v Speaker 1>having pith available on chain is a very important component

0:35:08.239 --> 0:35:10.800
<v Speaker 1>um for these these layer ones to compete with one another.

0:35:10.840 --> 0:35:13.240
<v Speaker 1>So it goes to all the E v M chains

0:35:13.280 --> 0:35:16.880
<v Speaker 1>now and will extend to the new ones, some with

0:35:17.640 --> 0:35:21.440
<v Speaker 1>competitive aspects, to Salona, using different languages as well. I

0:35:21.480 --> 0:35:24.000
<v Speaker 1>have to admit, Mike, a data oracle sounds a bit

0:35:24.160 --> 0:35:28.239
<v Speaker 1>like a mythical creature. So what exactly what is the

0:35:28.280 --> 0:35:30.759
<v Speaker 1>function that you serve in this community? What kind of

0:35:30.880 --> 0:35:33.480
<v Speaker 1>data are we talking about here? You know what is

0:35:33.480 --> 0:35:37.120
<v Speaker 1>the ultimate goal? Yeah, it does sound like a mythical creature.

0:35:37.160 --> 0:35:39.520
<v Speaker 1>The name does come from Greek pathology and pith comes

0:35:39.560 --> 0:35:42.600
<v Speaker 1>from Pythia, so there are ties in there. But today

0:35:43.680 --> 0:35:48.600
<v Speaker 1>the fifth data Um Spans the sector of Crypto, US equities,

0:35:48.840 --> 0:35:51.480
<v Speaker 1>F X, metals Um. So you've got a bit of everything.

0:35:51.640 --> 0:35:54.120
<v Speaker 1>You can see the price of apple updating on chain

0:35:54.160 --> 0:35:57.040
<v Speaker 1>every four in the middle seconds and being used by

0:35:57.080 --> 0:35:59.440
<v Speaker 1>anybody Um. But you can go on on the website

0:35:59.480 --> 0:36:02.040
<v Speaker 1>and see this information. We expected to have that scale

0:36:02.040 --> 0:36:04.160
<v Speaker 1>out other categories that people are interested in using them

0:36:04.160 --> 0:36:06.279
<v Speaker 1>in smart contracts. I'm with you. If you can make

0:36:06.560 --> 0:36:09.800
<v Speaker 1>mythical creatures to make foreign exchange sound all the more exciting,

0:36:09.920 --> 0:36:12.200
<v Speaker 1>I am in for that. Mike Cahill, that's the CEO

0:36:12.360 --> 0:36:15.480
<v Speaker 1>of Pith Data Association. Thank you so much. Ed Back

0:36:15.520 --> 0:36:27.560
<v Speaker 1>to you. Thanks, Tony Mythical let's talk about space. NASA

0:36:27.600 --> 0:36:30.120
<v Speaker 1>said earlier today the long awaited launch of its space

0:36:30.360 --> 0:36:34.279
<v Speaker 1>launch system is still possible next week after a successful

0:36:34.360 --> 0:36:39.800
<v Speaker 1>fueling test on Wednesday. But bad weather is on the horizon. Meantime,

0:36:40.040 --> 0:36:43.920
<v Speaker 1>we might also be closer to SPACEX, is starship conducting

0:36:44.280 --> 0:36:47.120
<v Speaker 1>in orbit or test launch, just not as close as

0:36:47.160 --> 0:36:49.879
<v Speaker 1>you might think. To wrap the week in space, Bloomberg's

0:36:49.960 --> 0:36:53.120
<v Speaker 1>Lauren grush joins me on set in New York. Yes,

0:36:53.600 --> 0:36:57.120
<v Speaker 1>let's start with sls. What is going on? That's a

0:36:57.160 --> 0:36:59.440
<v Speaker 1>great question, something I'm kind of trying to wrap my

0:36:59.440 --> 0:37:02.640
<v Speaker 1>head around as well. So yes, NASA is trying for

0:37:02.719 --> 0:37:06.040
<v Speaker 1>their third launch attempt of the space launch system, the

0:37:06.080 --> 0:37:09.600
<v Speaker 1>first who had been scrubbed for various technical reasons, and

0:37:09.920 --> 0:37:15.840
<v Speaker 1>they gave an update today. They're still targeting Tuesday septem however,

0:37:16.160 --> 0:37:20.160
<v Speaker 1>as you mentioned, a tropical storm or tropical tropical depression

0:37:20.800 --> 0:37:23.600
<v Speaker 1>is brewing off the coast of South America. The latest

0:37:23.640 --> 0:37:27.080
<v Speaker 1>forecast shows it heading straight towards Florida. All sorts of

0:37:27.160 --> 0:37:30.680
<v Speaker 1>emergencies are being declared over there, so it's not looking

0:37:30.719 --> 0:37:33.879
<v Speaker 1>good weatherwise. NASA says they are they're keeping an eye

0:37:33.880 --> 0:37:37.160
<v Speaker 1>on it. They're still tracking towards a launch, but they'll

0:37:37.200 --> 0:37:40.680
<v Speaker 1>make a decision, hopefully by tomorrow morning or early afternoon,

0:37:40.880 --> 0:37:44.120
<v Speaker 1>if they need to roll the rocket back from its

0:37:44.200 --> 0:37:47.200
<v Speaker 1>launchpad into the hangar. So Wednesday was kind of key.

0:37:47.320 --> 0:37:50.480
<v Speaker 1>I think we have some video of it, this fueling test. Yes,

0:37:51.080 --> 0:37:54.320
<v Speaker 1>what is that? So Um, during their second launch attempt

0:37:54.400 --> 0:37:57.320
<v Speaker 1>they had a hydrogen leak and they found they needed

0:37:57.320 --> 0:38:01.200
<v Speaker 1>to replace a component on the rocket, and then what

0:38:01.280 --> 0:38:03.520
<v Speaker 1>they wanted to do was to test if that that

0:38:03.640 --> 0:38:05.879
<v Speaker 1>worth that they had done had actually worked, and so

0:38:05.920 --> 0:38:09.160
<v Speaker 1>what they did on Wednesday was basically simulate what they

0:38:09.200 --> 0:38:11.960
<v Speaker 1>do on launch day by filling the rocket with propellant

0:38:12.320 --> 0:38:15.520
<v Speaker 1>and making sure that there weren't any leaks. Unfortunately, there

0:38:15.560 --> 0:38:18.360
<v Speaker 1>were some leaks that propped up during that test, but

0:38:18.600 --> 0:38:21.720
<v Speaker 1>they were able to push past them after some troubleshooting

0:38:21.960 --> 0:38:24.799
<v Speaker 1>and they were able to successfully fuel the rocket just

0:38:24.920 --> 0:38:27.279
<v Speaker 1>as they would on a launch day. So they said

0:38:27.280 --> 0:38:30.040
<v Speaker 1>that they met all of their objectives despite those issues,

0:38:30.440 --> 0:38:32.960
<v Speaker 1>and so they're still they're ready to go. They want

0:38:32.960 --> 0:38:35.120
<v Speaker 1>to launch this thing, but there seems to be all

0:38:35.120 --> 0:38:38.919
<v Speaker 1>these different varia questions. Are you ready to go? I've

0:38:39.000 --> 0:38:42.200
<v Speaker 1>gone to Florida twice now. I'm ready to book my

0:38:42.280 --> 0:38:44.839
<v Speaker 1>ticket for the third time, but I would prefer not

0:38:44.920 --> 0:38:47.200
<v Speaker 1>to go in the in the path that there is

0:38:47.200 --> 0:38:50.040
<v Speaker 1>a serious reason why we're paying attention to this launch, right,

0:38:50.120 --> 0:38:53.359
<v Speaker 1>which is there a bigger goals ultimately? What are those

0:38:53.360 --> 0:38:55.320
<v Speaker 1>bigger goals? I think we have a map which shows

0:38:55.800 --> 0:38:59.920
<v Speaker 1>if and when this mission launches, it's for a reason, right.

0:39:00.160 --> 0:39:04.439
<v Speaker 1>So sls is part of NASA's plan called Artemis, which

0:39:04.480 --> 0:39:07.600
<v Speaker 1>is this big, ambitious program to send the first woman,

0:39:07.640 --> 0:39:10.240
<v Speaker 1>in the first person of color to the moon, and

0:39:10.320 --> 0:39:12.600
<v Speaker 1>this is just the first step. So what they want

0:39:12.600 --> 0:39:15.759
<v Speaker 1>to do with Artemis one this mission is show that

0:39:16.280 --> 0:39:18.800
<v Speaker 1>the S L S, and it's in NASA's Deep Space

0:39:19.200 --> 0:39:21.759
<v Speaker 1>Ryan crew capsule, can actually work. There won't be any

0:39:21.800 --> 0:39:23.879
<v Speaker 1>people on board, but they want to send it around

0:39:23.920 --> 0:39:26.279
<v Speaker 1>the moon to just kind of have this demonstration so

0:39:26.320 --> 0:39:28.880
<v Speaker 1>that when they do put people on board they're confident

0:39:28.960 --> 0:39:31.799
<v Speaker 1>that they'll be safe. Lauren, this week Elon Musk has

0:39:31.840 --> 0:39:36.880
<v Speaker 1>been tweetingcker and one of the things that he tweeted

0:39:36.960 --> 0:39:39.440
<v Speaker 1>was in response to a question on starship and when

0:39:39.480 --> 0:39:45.000
<v Speaker 1>starship will do its first orbital test flight. He says

0:39:45.640 --> 0:39:48.960
<v Speaker 1>November seems highly likely. We will have two boosters and

0:39:48.960 --> 0:39:53.759
<v Speaker 1>ships ready for orbital flight by then with full stack production.

0:39:54.800 --> 0:39:58.000
<v Speaker 1>What does that mean? Well, I if you've been following

0:39:58.040 --> 0:40:00.560
<v Speaker 1>Elon's tweets, which I'm sure you have. He does like

0:40:00.680 --> 0:40:05.319
<v Speaker 1>to make very aspirational goals for his flights. So you know,

0:40:05.360 --> 0:40:08.200
<v Speaker 1>I think he said earlier when March it was ready,

0:40:08.280 --> 0:40:11.840
<v Speaker 1>maybe April. I think back in even he said it

0:40:11.840 --> 0:40:14.680
<v Speaker 1>would be launching in six months. So every time he

0:40:14.719 --> 0:40:17.080
<v Speaker 1>gives us a launch date I take it with, you know,

0:40:17.600 --> 0:40:22.480
<v Speaker 1>a boulder sized grain of salt. However, that said, SPACEX

0:40:22.520 --> 0:40:25.600
<v Speaker 1>has been been making great progress on starship development. They

0:40:25.640 --> 0:40:29.959
<v Speaker 1>had recently had a seven engine raptor static fire next

0:40:30.040 --> 0:40:32.960
<v Speaker 1>the back. Next big goal would be to static fire

0:40:33.440 --> 0:40:36.000
<v Speaker 1>thirty three of those engines and that's that's a lot

0:40:36.040 --> 0:40:38.920
<v Speaker 1>of engines at once. So there'll be a lot of flames.

0:40:39.239 --> 0:40:42.800
<v Speaker 1>They've also been prone to set the Boca Chica area

0:40:42.960 --> 0:40:46.040
<v Speaker 1>around them on fire sometimes when that happens. So we'll

0:40:46.120 --> 0:40:48.360
<v Speaker 1>we'll be keeping an eye on that and once that happens,

0:40:48.400 --> 0:40:51.360
<v Speaker 1>then I think will be realistically getting closer. And to

0:40:51.480 --> 0:40:54.000
<v Speaker 1>end Friday on a positive note, I understand that there's

0:40:54.000 --> 0:40:58.560
<v Speaker 1>a meteor headling, headling, hurtling towards earth, but that we're

0:40:58.600 --> 0:41:01.200
<v Speaker 1>not in danger. Even so, NASA, we're going to try

0:41:01.280 --> 0:41:04.680
<v Speaker 1>and crash land something into it so it's not hurtling

0:41:04.719 --> 0:41:09.080
<v Speaker 1>towards earth. It's it's completely fine, completely benign. It's the

0:41:09.160 --> 0:41:13.320
<v Speaker 1>dark mission. NASA is testing out a method for potentially

0:41:13.440 --> 0:41:16.319
<v Speaker 1>nudging asteroids out of the way if we ever were

0:41:16.320 --> 0:41:18.480
<v Speaker 1>to find one coming towards earth in the future. So

0:41:18.520 --> 0:41:21.200
<v Speaker 1>this is just a test. Nobody needs to worry, no

0:41:21.239 --> 0:41:24.120
<v Speaker 1>one needs to, you know, pack up and head for

0:41:24.160 --> 0:41:27.719
<v Speaker 1>the hills, though I don't know if you'd be safe there. Um. No,

0:41:27.920 --> 0:41:29.520
<v Speaker 1>this is just a test, and what they're doing is

0:41:29.520 --> 0:41:34.120
<v Speaker 1>they're intentionally sending a spacecraft into an asteroid to nudge

0:41:34.120 --> 0:41:36.000
<v Speaker 1>it off of its course and then that way, if

0:41:36.040 --> 0:41:37.879
<v Speaker 1>we were to ever have an asteroid headed our way

0:41:37.880 --> 0:41:40.319
<v Speaker 1>that we knew about, that could just, you know, make

0:41:40.360 --> 0:41:43.840
<v Speaker 1>it veer away from Earth safely. This is just a test.

0:41:43.880 --> 0:41:46.040
<v Speaker 1>Blunt Bergs, Lauren Grush, thank you.