WEBVTT - Arm Disappoints with Outlook, Vanguard Slashes Fees

0:00:00.840 --> 0:00:05.080
<v Speaker 1>From the heart of where innovation, money and power collide

0:00:05.360 --> 0:00:10.640
<v Speaker 1>in Silicon Valley and beyond. This is Bloomberg Technology with

0:00:10.800 --> 0:00:15.480
<v Speaker 1>Caroline Hyde and Ed Ludlow.

0:00:26.480 --> 0:00:29.160
<v Speaker 2>Like from New York, I'm Caroline Hyde and I'm Jackie

0:00:29.160 --> 0:00:30.360
<v Speaker 2>Devalis in San Francisco.

0:00:30.440 --> 0:00:32.520
<v Speaker 3>This is Bloomberg Technology coming up.

0:00:32.840 --> 0:00:36.360
<v Speaker 4>Arm shares are down after a conservative forecast. We get

0:00:36.400 --> 0:00:40.239
<v Speaker 4>the CEO's take on the strength of smartphone and AI demand,

0:00:40.600 --> 0:00:44.239
<v Speaker 4>plus Roadblock shares slump after users and engagement slide. We

0:00:44.320 --> 0:00:46.800
<v Speaker 4>dissect the worst cell of since May, and the CEO

0:00:46.800 --> 0:00:49.800
<v Speaker 4>of Vanguard joins to discuss the company's record fee cuts

0:00:49.840 --> 0:00:52.720
<v Speaker 4>for dozens of mutual funds and ets. But first we

0:00:52.800 --> 0:00:55.920
<v Speaker 4>look at these broader markets. Right now, we're wobbling around

0:00:56.000 --> 0:00:56.720
<v Speaker 4>gains and losses.

0:00:56.720 --> 0:00:57.720
<v Speaker 3>On the NASAQ one hundred.

0:00:57.760 --> 0:00:59.720
<v Speaker 4>More broadly muted, we're up just about a tenth of

0:00:59.760 --> 0:01:02.440
<v Speaker 4>a There are some big moves when you look underneath

0:01:02.480 --> 0:01:04.720
<v Speaker 4>the hood and video on the points upside. Here on

0:01:04.760 --> 0:01:07.200
<v Speaker 4>the downside, we're a little bit anxious about TESLO. Get

0:01:07.240 --> 0:01:09.120
<v Speaker 4>into that later, but move on to see what the

0:01:09.120 --> 0:01:12.319
<v Speaker 4>individual moves are from an earnings perspective. Qui com off

0:01:12.360 --> 0:01:14.120
<v Speaker 4>by four point eight percent one of the biggest points

0:01:14.200 --> 0:01:16.679
<v Speaker 4>drags to the downside. Look, they managed to beat in

0:01:16.760 --> 0:01:18.399
<v Speaker 4>terms of earnings, they've beate in.

0:01:18.400 --> 0:01:19.280
<v Speaker 3>Terms of forecast.

0:01:19.480 --> 0:01:21.720
<v Speaker 4>But the outlook for the smartphone market is where it

0:01:21.800 --> 0:01:25.520
<v Speaker 4>does into investor anxiety. Are we flatlining only seeing flat

0:01:25.560 --> 0:01:26.760
<v Speaker 4>to single digit growth there?

0:01:27.040 --> 0:01:27.120
<v Speaker 5>That?

0:01:27.240 --> 0:01:29.600
<v Speaker 4>Of course smartphone anxiety does feed in a little bit

0:01:29.760 --> 0:01:32.920
<v Speaker 4>to armholdings as well. Key chip designer out there of

0:01:32.959 --> 0:01:34.360
<v Speaker 4>course down some four percent.

0:01:34.720 --> 0:01:37.080
<v Speaker 3>Look, they too beat the street on earnings, on.

0:01:37.080 --> 0:01:39.720
<v Speaker 4>Earnings for share basis, you look at revenue dialing up

0:01:39.720 --> 0:01:40.679
<v Speaker 4>almost twenty percent.

0:01:40.920 --> 0:01:42.160
<v Speaker 3>But again it's a world a.

0:01:42.160 --> 0:01:45.680
<v Speaker 4>Conservative forecast and what this means not only for smartphones,

0:01:45.760 --> 0:01:48.000
<v Speaker 4>but what it means for AI demand as well. We've

0:01:48.000 --> 0:01:51.000
<v Speaker 4>got to get to it with Arms CEO Rene Haas,

0:01:51.040 --> 0:01:53.440
<v Speaker 4>who joins us now. And I put it to you,

0:01:53.440 --> 0:01:56.440
<v Speaker 4>you've been out everywhere at the moment. There's deals being

0:01:56.480 --> 0:01:58.240
<v Speaker 4>done of course, a soft bank and open AI that

0:01:58.280 --> 0:02:01.280
<v Speaker 4>will dig into. But what a this forecast and what

0:02:01.320 --> 0:02:03.480
<v Speaker 4>it signals for your business? Is it just you being

0:02:03.520 --> 0:02:05.320
<v Speaker 4>conservative as a newly public company.

0:02:06.720 --> 0:02:10.440
<v Speaker 6>Thanks Kerley and appreciate you having me on this morning. Yeah,

0:02:10.440 --> 0:02:13.600
<v Speaker 6>I don't know if I agree with the dialogue. Muted forecast.

0:02:14.240 --> 0:02:19.280
<v Speaker 6>We beat our projections for Q three and we actually

0:02:19.360 --> 0:02:23.440
<v Speaker 6>raise guidance for Q four and for the year, and

0:02:23.480 --> 0:02:26.560
<v Speaker 6>we're looking at about four billion dollars of annual revenue,

0:02:26.960 --> 0:02:29.160
<v Speaker 6>which is about twenty five percent.

0:02:28.960 --> 0:02:30.160
<v Speaker 5>Increase over the last year.

0:02:30.560 --> 0:02:33.440
<v Speaker 6>So we're super happy with the trajectory of the business

0:02:33.440 --> 0:02:34.360
<v Speaker 6>and super happy.

0:02:34.080 --> 0:02:34.720
<v Speaker 5>With the performance.

0:02:35.440 --> 0:02:38.960
<v Speaker 3>Maybe just investors are too exuberant.

0:02:39.000 --> 0:02:41.239
<v Speaker 4>They're too exuberant around the fact that you've already said

0:02:41.280 --> 0:02:43.920
<v Speaker 4>your compute platform is going to help open ai and

0:02:44.000 --> 0:02:47.480
<v Speaker 4>SoftBank make good on their Advanced Enterprise AI, the optimism

0:02:47.480 --> 0:02:50.079
<v Speaker 4>around your AI future, as well as how integral you

0:02:50.120 --> 0:02:53.239
<v Speaker 4>are to smartphones. So is it that are people too

0:02:53.280 --> 0:02:55.320
<v Speaker 4>excited about the AI opportunity here.

0:02:57.240 --> 0:02:59.440
<v Speaker 6>I'm going to try to decouple what the market is

0:02:59.440 --> 0:03:01.760
<v Speaker 6>saying about it results and just talk about the results

0:03:01.919 --> 0:03:05.280
<v Speaker 6>in general, which we are again incredibly pleased by. We

0:03:05.320 --> 0:03:08.600
<v Speaker 6>are seeing extremely strong demand for our products across the board.

0:03:09.200 --> 0:03:11.960
<v Speaker 6>We had record royalties. We were up twenty three percent

0:03:12.040 --> 0:03:16.200
<v Speaker 6>year on year. Our Version nine compute subsystems, which drive

0:03:16.240 --> 0:03:19.720
<v Speaker 6>higher world tier rates. We're just growing faster than the market,

0:03:19.960 --> 0:03:22.919
<v Speaker 6>which is what we told investors when we went public

0:03:22.960 --> 0:03:25.240
<v Speaker 6>back in analyst day A year and a half ago plus,

0:03:25.760 --> 0:03:29.440
<v Speaker 6>So yeah, we're not seeing any slow down demand quite frankly, Carolin.

0:03:29.440 --> 0:03:32.480
<v Speaker 6>In fact, we're seeing an acceleration in it, particularly driven

0:03:32.480 --> 0:03:36.040
<v Speaker 6>by all things around artificial intelligence Renee.

0:03:36.480 --> 0:03:39.160
<v Speaker 2>Speaking of future growth, one of the things that ARM

0:03:39.240 --> 0:03:43.800
<v Speaker 2>is also banking on is its high profile partnership in Stargate,

0:03:44.040 --> 0:03:46.200
<v Speaker 2>and you're a big player in that. Could you kind

0:03:46.200 --> 0:03:49.680
<v Speaker 2>of tell us what investors can expect this year to

0:03:49.800 --> 0:03:51.120
<v Speaker 2>gain from that venture.

0:03:52.480 --> 0:03:54.800
<v Speaker 6>I can say, broadly speaking, the way you think about

0:03:54.800 --> 0:03:58.520
<v Speaker 6>Stargate is it's an infrastructure project unlike any other five

0:03:58.560 --> 0:04:02.360
<v Speaker 6>hundred billion dollars one hundred billion dollars will spend initially,

0:04:02.800 --> 0:04:05.280
<v Speaker 6>and these are to build out the world's largest AI

0:04:05.400 --> 0:04:08.600
<v Speaker 6>data centers for training and inference. We are the key

0:04:08.640 --> 0:04:10.640
<v Speaker 6>technology partner around CPU.

0:04:10.720 --> 0:04:11.560
<v Speaker 5>We're the only.

0:04:11.440 --> 0:04:15.120
<v Speaker 6>CPU technology partner that was named, which is terrific obviously

0:04:15.120 --> 0:04:18.680
<v Speaker 6>for us. One can imagine going forward a lot of

0:04:18.800 --> 0:04:22.240
<v Speaker 6>opportunity for technology innovation there. But in a near term

0:04:22.680 --> 0:04:25.120
<v Speaker 6>we'll be linked with the Grace Blackwell ship using the

0:04:25.240 --> 0:04:28.400
<v Speaker 6>Gray CPU which is ARM based and the Blackwell GPU,

0:04:28.400 --> 0:04:31.920
<v Speaker 6>which is video based. But these large frontier models are

0:04:31.920 --> 0:04:34.839
<v Speaker 6>going to require Jackie a huge amount of power for

0:04:35.000 --> 0:04:38.080
<v Speaker 6>training and inference, and we're just so excited about being

0:04:38.080 --> 0:04:39.680
<v Speaker 6>involved in this. It's going to be fantastic.

0:04:40.640 --> 0:04:43.039
<v Speaker 2>Well, at the same time, this project also kind of

0:04:43.080 --> 0:04:47.160
<v Speaker 2>puts you in the middle of this US China tech rivalry.

0:04:47.320 --> 0:04:49.920
<v Speaker 2>You're at the front lines of it, being the top

0:04:49.960 --> 0:04:53.159
<v Speaker 2>supplier to American AI companies. And I'm curious if you

0:04:53.200 --> 0:04:56.960
<v Speaker 2>think that perhaps tying your fortunes so closely to Opening

0:04:57.040 --> 0:04:57.839
<v Speaker 2>Eye is a risk.

0:04:59.320 --> 0:05:01.000
<v Speaker 6>I'm not sure I think about it quite that way.

0:05:01.279 --> 0:05:05.159
<v Speaker 6>Open Ai is a fantastic partner. Arguably, they're the leader

0:05:05.400 --> 0:05:08.160
<v Speaker 6>at the moment in terms of adoption of chat, GPT

0:05:08.400 --> 0:05:12.080
<v Speaker 6>and their APIs and their enterprise suite. We work with everyone,

0:05:12.120 --> 0:05:14.200
<v Speaker 6>though we work very closely with Google, we work closely

0:05:14.279 --> 0:05:17.800
<v Speaker 6>with Meta Aws, you know all the partners. But we're

0:05:17.920 --> 0:05:20.760
<v Speaker 6>very thrilled to be involved with open Ai. They have phenomenal.

0:05:20.279 --> 0:05:24.400
<v Speaker 4>Technology, Renee, We're going to lean into that China US

0:05:24.480 --> 0:05:27.560
<v Speaker 4>story deep seek extraordinary.

0:05:27.240 --> 0:05:29.280
<v Speaker 3>The push and pull it has in the narratives.

0:05:29.520 --> 0:05:32.400
<v Speaker 4>Can you explain as to whether you think we are

0:05:32.480 --> 0:05:35.240
<v Speaker 4>going to need as much compute as we all foresaw before.

0:05:36.520 --> 0:05:39.440
<v Speaker 6>Oh, I think unquestionably, Caroline, And in fact I think

0:05:39.760 --> 0:05:41.920
<v Speaker 6>even more than we probably have been thought about. So

0:05:42.600 --> 0:05:44.919
<v Speaker 6>why is that, Well, if you look at what deep

0:05:44.960 --> 0:05:47.400
<v Speaker 6>Seek has done, which is an amazing by the way

0:05:47.440 --> 0:05:51.159
<v Speaker 6>piece of work they've done what's called distillation, and distillation

0:05:51.360 --> 0:05:54.360
<v Speaker 6>is building on top of an existing frontier model, which

0:05:54.440 --> 0:05:58.440
<v Speaker 6>takes lots of power and lots of compute to generate.

0:05:58.520 --> 0:06:02.200
<v Speaker 6>If you think about GPT four which was hundreds of megawatts,

0:06:03.000 --> 0:06:06.560
<v Speaker 6>GBT five sixty seven, these are in the gigawats. So

0:06:06.880 --> 0:06:09.520
<v Speaker 6>even though you may have models that can distill or

0:06:09.520 --> 0:06:12.880
<v Speaker 6>build a con the frontier models, the frontier models still

0:06:12.880 --> 0:06:15.280
<v Speaker 6>need a lot of power. And then with that that

0:06:15.360 --> 0:06:18.159
<v Speaker 6>drives a huge demand for inference, which is really where

0:06:18.160 --> 0:06:21.919
<v Speaker 6>the larger use loads are. And more efficient inference means

0:06:21.960 --> 0:06:26.480
<v Speaker 6>you can drive AI to much smaller devices, to smartphones, earbuds,

0:06:27.360 --> 0:06:30.960
<v Speaker 6>devices that don't have a lot of capability for power.

0:06:31.279 --> 0:06:33.760
<v Speaker 6>It's great for armed because that's where we are today,

0:06:33.839 --> 0:06:35.720
<v Speaker 6>is where we exist, and now you can run those

0:06:35.760 --> 0:06:39.039
<v Speaker 6>AI workloads on the CPU. So I think actually, what

0:06:39.120 --> 0:06:41.520
<v Speaker 6>deep seat proves is that we're just going to see

0:06:41.560 --> 0:06:43.919
<v Speaker 6>an even more accelerant towards towards compute.

0:06:45.040 --> 0:06:47.800
<v Speaker 2>Well, on that front, you know you have a significant

0:06:47.800 --> 0:06:51.479
<v Speaker 2>business in China. Are you concerned at all about perhaps

0:06:51.839 --> 0:06:56.440
<v Speaker 2>how the slowing smartphone business might affect Arm's future growth.

0:06:58.000 --> 0:06:59.080
<v Speaker 5>Yeah, it's a great question.

0:06:59.200 --> 0:07:01.400
<v Speaker 6>And you know again and what we've seen in smartphones

0:07:01.480 --> 0:07:05.240
<v Speaker 6>with your single digits type of growth, we're in the

0:07:05.360 --> 0:07:08.480
<v Speaker 6>double digits growth in terms of royalties, in some cases

0:07:08.520 --> 0:07:09.479
<v Speaker 6>twenty percent growth.

0:07:09.480 --> 0:07:10.560
<v Speaker 5>And why is that?

0:07:11.240 --> 0:07:14.200
<v Speaker 6>We're putting more technology into these phones, our version nine,

0:07:14.240 --> 0:07:18.280
<v Speaker 6>our compute subsystems drive higher royalty rates, So we're just

0:07:18.320 --> 0:07:21.320
<v Speaker 6>growing faster than the market, and particularly in the premium segment,

0:07:21.360 --> 0:07:24.640
<v Speaker 6>which requires more and more compute. So while the units

0:07:24.640 --> 0:07:27.040
<v Speaker 6>have been slowed in some areas, it actually hasn't impacted

0:07:27.080 --> 0:07:27.640
<v Speaker 6>us very much.

0:07:27.720 --> 0:07:29.000
<v Speaker 5>Just look at our record royalties.

0:07:29.840 --> 0:07:31.720
<v Speaker 6>To have this kind of number in a market where

0:07:31.720 --> 0:07:35.240
<v Speaker 6>people think things are slowing down, just phenomenal record royalties.

0:07:35.320 --> 0:07:36.400
<v Speaker 3>Upside in licensing.

0:07:36.680 --> 0:07:38.560
<v Speaker 4>I would just want to get to the litigation if

0:07:38.600 --> 0:07:41.160
<v Speaker 4>I'm met here, Naam, and briefly, perhaps it hasn't gone

0:07:41.280 --> 0:07:42.520
<v Speaker 4>the way that you thought with Qualcom.

0:07:42.600 --> 0:07:44.160
<v Speaker 3>What does it mean for the future earnings?

0:07:45.600 --> 0:07:49.320
<v Speaker 6>Really, there's no impact on future earnings, Caroline. The trial

0:07:49.400 --> 0:07:51.600
<v Speaker 6>was a mistrial on one of the verdicts, so the

0:07:51.640 --> 0:07:54.240
<v Speaker 6>dispute is still open. But to your question, in terms

0:07:54.240 --> 0:07:56.560
<v Speaker 6>of the future forecast, we have no impact whatsoever.

0:08:00.120 --> 0:08:03.360
<v Speaker 2>Rene Ha, CEO of ARM, thank you for joining us.

0:08:03.440 --> 0:08:06.160
<v Speaker 2>Coming up more with tech earnings with a Yako yoshioga

0:08:06.200 --> 0:08:09.640
<v Speaker 2>from Wealth and here the speaker Caroline, let some quick.

0:08:09.480 --> 0:08:12.200
<v Speaker 4>Check on some other earnings that we've had on deck.

0:08:12.320 --> 0:08:15.600
<v Speaker 4>Peloton is one of them. No, I'm afraid revenue is down,

0:08:15.680 --> 0:08:19.560
<v Speaker 4>but profitability is better. A new management team managed to

0:08:19.800 --> 0:08:22.960
<v Speaker 4>lift the optimism around this name. We're fourteen percent higher,

0:08:23.000 --> 0:08:25.160
<v Speaker 4>but it's only trading at eight dollars sixty eight from

0:08:25.200 --> 0:08:35.760
<v Speaker 4>New York, San Francisco. This's a Bloomberg Technology.

0:08:38.080 --> 0:08:41.000
<v Speaker 2>Back to earnings with roadblocks out this morning and reporting

0:08:41.080 --> 0:08:43.720
<v Speaker 2>daily active users for the fourth quarter that fell short

0:08:43.800 --> 0:08:47.120
<v Speaker 2>of estimates. Let's bring in Bloomberg Cecilia Denastasio to break

0:08:47.160 --> 0:08:50.200
<v Speaker 2>down the numbers. Cecilia break it down for us what

0:08:50.360 --> 0:08:52.880
<v Speaker 2>went wrong here that ultimately spooped investors.

0:08:54.559 --> 0:08:57.640
<v Speaker 7>After many quarters of growth and daily active users, Roeblocks

0:08:57.720 --> 0:09:02.760
<v Speaker 7>unfortunately reported a disap winning decline in how many people

0:09:02.800 --> 0:09:06.520
<v Speaker 7>are accessing the platform in the last quarter. In an

0:09:06.559 --> 0:09:11.200
<v Speaker 7>earnings call today, Roblox's chief financial officer partially attributed that

0:09:11.280 --> 0:09:17.280
<v Speaker 7>decline to Roblox's ban in Turkey over concerns over child safety.

0:09:17.360 --> 0:09:21.600
<v Speaker 4>And what's interesting is child safety affecting Turkey? Of course

0:09:21.640 --> 0:09:24.360
<v Speaker 4>the key country here, But it wasn't long ago that

0:09:24.400 --> 0:09:27.760
<v Speaker 4>Hindenburg research acuse roadblocks have also inflating user numbers and

0:09:27.880 --> 0:09:30.880
<v Speaker 4>time played. Is there any hint that read across in

0:09:30.960 --> 0:09:31.880
<v Speaker 4>these numbers, Cecilia.

0:09:32.840 --> 0:09:36.199
<v Speaker 7>Lots of analysts have cast doubt on those allegations against

0:09:36.320 --> 0:09:39.800
<v Speaker 7>Roblox's user number inflation. Unfortunately, I don't have anything original

0:09:39.880 --> 0:09:44.319
<v Speaker 7>to report on that currently, but Roblox's growth has been

0:09:44.600 --> 0:09:48.360
<v Speaker 7>pretty consistent for a long time. People are very disappointed

0:09:48.600 --> 0:09:49.120
<v Speaker 7>by these.

0:09:49.000 --> 0:09:53.560
<v Speaker 2>Results, Cecilia. What's competition looking like in this space?

0:09:55.480 --> 0:09:56.000
<v Speaker 8>Sure so?

0:09:56.280 --> 0:09:56.760
<v Speaker 9>Right now?

0:09:56.920 --> 0:10:00.160
<v Speaker 7>Growth in the games industry broadly is very challenged. The

0:10:00.200 --> 0:10:03.480
<v Speaker 7>cost of developing Triple A games, your Spider Man's, you

0:10:03.520 --> 0:10:07.600
<v Speaker 7>Know Your overwatches is skyrocketing, and at the same time

0:10:08.040 --> 0:10:10.800
<v Speaker 7>a lot of investors are seeing potential in user generated

0:10:10.840 --> 0:10:13.840
<v Speaker 7>games like the ones that people create on roadblocks. These

0:10:13.880 --> 0:10:16.720
<v Speaker 7>games are often created by amateurs or by very small

0:10:16.760 --> 0:10:20.200
<v Speaker 7>teams using tools that the companies themselves provide. Epic Games,

0:10:20.240 --> 0:10:23.320
<v Speaker 7>which makes Fortnite, has its own platform along these lines.

0:10:23.120 --> 0:10:26.560
<v Speaker 4>As well, and some of them get sold for an

0:10:26.600 --> 0:10:27.480
<v Speaker 4>awful lot of money.

0:10:27.600 --> 0:10:30.079
<v Speaker 3>Cecilia Denastasio, it's great to have you. Thank you for

0:10:30.160 --> 0:10:31.120
<v Speaker 3>running us through roadblocks.

0:10:31.160 --> 0:10:33.720
<v Speaker 4>Let's get more earnings takeaways with Ioko Yoshioka is with

0:10:33.800 --> 0:10:35.920
<v Speaker 4>us for for any manager at the Wealth Enhancement Group.

0:10:36.280 --> 0:10:39.320
<v Speaker 4>And there's been so much to digest. One theme that

0:10:39.320 --> 0:10:44.400
<v Speaker 4>seems to be running through is AI anxiety and smartphone anxiety,

0:10:44.600 --> 0:10:45.920
<v Speaker 4>and I just want to bring up with what we're

0:10:45.920 --> 0:10:48.760
<v Speaker 4>seeing with qualcomon ARMED today and to worry about smartphones

0:10:48.760 --> 0:10:49.640
<v Speaker 4>flatlining and what.

0:10:49.520 --> 0:10:51.199
<v Speaker 3>That means for some of these chip providers.

0:10:51.760 --> 0:10:53.079
<v Speaker 4>What do you make of it, Iaco, I know you

0:10:53.120 --> 0:10:55.280
<v Speaker 4>don't hold qualcommon arm, but what would you make about

0:10:55.280 --> 0:10:55.760
<v Speaker 4>the readA.

0:10:55.600 --> 0:10:57.960
<v Speaker 3>Cross sure so high?

0:10:58.040 --> 0:11:02.760
<v Speaker 10>Caroline? You know, in terms of the overall AI environment,

0:11:02.840 --> 0:11:05.480
<v Speaker 10>I think we're focused on both the short term and

0:11:05.520 --> 0:11:08.440
<v Speaker 10>the long term. Right in the short term for companies

0:11:08.480 --> 0:11:11.679
<v Speaker 10>like Qualcom, you know, they're really impacted by the handset

0:11:11.800 --> 0:11:14.920
<v Speaker 10>slow down. However, you know, I think if you look

0:11:15.000 --> 0:11:18.040
<v Speaker 10>out longer term and where they're going to play is

0:11:18.120 --> 0:11:21.240
<v Speaker 10>really in that you know, inference side, or you know

0:11:21.480 --> 0:11:25.880
<v Speaker 10>where the chips will be able to be in smaller

0:11:25.920 --> 0:11:29.920
<v Speaker 10>devices as the ARM CEO talked about, and things like

0:11:30.080 --> 0:11:33.920
<v Speaker 10>new form factors with like metas ray band glasses. These

0:11:33.920 --> 0:11:37.679
<v Speaker 10>are going to be where you know, Qualcom might have

0:11:37.800 --> 0:11:41.120
<v Speaker 10>additional you know, exposure to which would be a positive

0:11:41.120 --> 0:11:41.800
<v Speaker 10>for Qualcom.

0:11:42.080 --> 0:11:44.839
<v Speaker 4>It's interesting the best points contributor on the day is

0:11:44.880 --> 0:11:47.520
<v Speaker 4>in video and there's a note out of JP Morgan saying, actually,

0:11:47.960 --> 0:11:51.199
<v Speaker 4>like these deep Seak moves, this less compute necessary is

0:11:51.200 --> 0:11:53.560
<v Speaker 4>actually going to win out for them from an inference perspective.

0:11:53.800 --> 0:11:55.560
<v Speaker 4>So where have you come out on this whole divide

0:11:55.559 --> 0:11:57.720
<v Speaker 4>as to whether companies should be spending a lot on

0:11:57.800 --> 0:11:58.680
<v Speaker 4>AIF structure.

0:12:00.080 --> 0:12:03.559
<v Speaker 10>So I think the arms race is on and that

0:12:03.840 --> 0:12:06.280
<v Speaker 10>most companies are going to spend in order to make

0:12:06.280 --> 0:12:10.480
<v Speaker 10>sure that they have all the primary models set, all

0:12:10.520 --> 0:12:13.880
<v Speaker 10>the frontier models that ARM talked about, and then it's

0:12:13.920 --> 0:12:16.600
<v Speaker 10>going to be how best to access you know, all

0:12:16.640 --> 0:12:20.400
<v Speaker 10>the efficiencies that Deep Seek brought are going to be

0:12:20.480 --> 0:12:23.160
<v Speaker 10>you know, explored by many companies. And so I think

0:12:23.200 --> 0:12:27.080
<v Speaker 10>there's a lot of ways to play AI. And you know,

0:12:27.160 --> 0:12:30.400
<v Speaker 10>we're still trying to figure out what the landscape is

0:12:30.400 --> 0:12:34.160
<v Speaker 10>really going to look like, and it's accelerating. It's just

0:12:34.280 --> 0:12:39.120
<v Speaker 10>moving so quickly. You know, every month there's something new on.

0:12:39.080 --> 0:12:41.960
<v Speaker 2>The cloud computing front. We've already seen some mixed numbers

0:12:42.000 --> 0:12:46.280
<v Speaker 2>coming from the hyperscalers Alphabet, Microsoft. What are you expecting

0:12:47.200 --> 0:12:49.360
<v Speaker 2>when Amazon reports later today?

0:12:50.559 --> 0:12:53.760
<v Speaker 10>Sure, so I think everybody's focused again on what the

0:12:53.840 --> 0:12:57.960
<v Speaker 10>Capex guide might be, any sort of color commentary on Capex.

0:12:58.320 --> 0:13:02.320
<v Speaker 10>You know, everybody's looking at that Capex trajectory to see,

0:13:02.400 --> 0:13:05.840
<v Speaker 10>you know, is everybody getting that return.

0:13:05.559 --> 0:13:06.480
<v Speaker 3>On that spend.

0:13:06.880 --> 0:13:09.720
<v Speaker 10>But you know, I think the demand for cloud computing

0:13:09.800 --> 0:13:13.120
<v Speaker 10>continues to increase, and so it makes sense from a

0:13:13.120 --> 0:13:16.440
<v Speaker 10>long term perspective for many of these hyperscalers to continue

0:13:16.480 --> 0:13:19.040
<v Speaker 10>to spend on increasing capacity in the cloud.

0:13:20.080 --> 0:13:22.800
<v Speaker 2>Speaking of demand, one of the things that always surprised

0:13:22.800 --> 0:13:25.600
<v Speaker 2>me about Alphabet's cloud unit is that it had a

0:13:25.600 --> 0:13:29.240
<v Speaker 2>good chunk of business coming from smaller, more nimble AI startups,

0:13:29.679 --> 0:13:31.400
<v Speaker 2>And with some of the numbers that it put out,

0:13:31.400 --> 0:13:34.360
<v Speaker 2>I'm curious if you are thinking if that kind of demand,

0:13:34.360 --> 0:13:37.079
<v Speaker 2>if that vector of growth has kind of run its course.

0:13:38.520 --> 0:13:39.240
<v Speaker 3>I don't think so.

0:13:39.440 --> 0:13:43.080
<v Speaker 10>I think AI is still so relatively new that I

0:13:43.120 --> 0:13:46.280
<v Speaker 10>think there's going to be new innovative players that are

0:13:46.320 --> 0:13:49.600
<v Speaker 10>going to want to access you know, that that AI

0:13:49.800 --> 0:13:55.640
<v Speaker 10>platform through Google, Google or through Microsoft or AWS. I think,

0:13:55.760 --> 0:13:58.720
<v Speaker 10>you know, there's going to be different companies that explore

0:13:58.760 --> 0:14:01.760
<v Speaker 10>different platforms just see what's best for them.

0:14:02.360 --> 0:14:06.320
<v Speaker 4>What's so interesting is Amazon has been making its own chips,

0:14:06.880 --> 0:14:10.200
<v Speaker 4>and so too Alphabet. Actually, even though it shares fell

0:14:10.240 --> 0:14:13.199
<v Speaker 4>on its earnings, broad Com sword because of the CAPEX

0:14:13.720 --> 0:14:16.440
<v Speaker 4>spending and what it means for chip makers for some

0:14:16.480 --> 0:14:19.280
<v Speaker 4>of these cloud computing companies. What do you make of

0:14:19.360 --> 0:14:27.160
<v Speaker 4>how the getting into the vertically AI focus.

0:14:24.760 --> 0:14:28.560
<v Speaker 10>In terms of the overall spend, I think, you know,

0:14:28.600 --> 0:14:32.800
<v Speaker 10>it's just going to continue. That spend going to a

0:14:32.840 --> 0:14:37.320
<v Speaker 10>lot of these you know, chip makers, so whether it's

0:14:37.400 --> 0:14:41.880
<v Speaker 10>Nvidia or Broadcom. Eventually it will come to Qualcomm as well.

0:14:42.520 --> 0:14:45.000
<v Speaker 10>But I think it's going to continue. You know, there's

0:14:45.040 --> 0:14:49.240
<v Speaker 10>so many ways to access AI and build it out.

0:14:49.880 --> 0:14:52.800
<v Speaker 10>I think that it's going to continue to develop over

0:14:52.840 --> 0:14:53.600
<v Speaker 10>the long term.

0:14:54.240 --> 0:14:57.160
<v Speaker 4>The thing that everyone's trying to wrestle with is the valuations.

0:14:57.480 --> 0:15:00.240
<v Speaker 4>So with all this optimism, arm trades that are undred

0:15:00.320 --> 0:15:03.200
<v Speaker 4>times future ournings. Maybe that's why it pulls back from

0:15:03.240 --> 0:15:06.960
<v Speaker 4>the day on what the market says is slightly muted forecasts.

0:15:07.120 --> 0:15:09.440
<v Speaker 4>What do you make of the valuation levels since the

0:15:09.520 --> 0:15:11.480
<v Speaker 4>sell off from deep seacone and video for example.

0:15:12.360 --> 0:15:15.600
<v Speaker 10>Well, and I think that's why Qualcomm's valuation is pretty

0:15:15.640 --> 0:15:18.120
<v Speaker 10>interesting here. You know, it's still in the you know,

0:15:18.400 --> 0:15:21.280
<v Speaker 10>mid teens, low double digits, and you know, I think

0:15:21.520 --> 0:15:24.320
<v Speaker 10>that if you look out far enough, you'll see that

0:15:24.360 --> 0:15:27.520
<v Speaker 10>there's potentially, you know, a lot more growth coming for

0:15:27.640 --> 0:15:31.040
<v Speaker 10>Qualcom in the future. However, you know, you have to

0:15:31.040 --> 0:15:33.480
<v Speaker 10>look at the valuations both in the near term. Nvidia

0:15:33.520 --> 0:15:37.600
<v Speaker 10>does trade at high valuations as well, but again, if

0:15:37.640 --> 0:15:40.640
<v Speaker 10>the buildout continues, if you're really going to need to

0:15:40.720 --> 0:15:45.120
<v Speaker 10>continue to spend so much both you know, Broadcom and Nvidia,

0:15:45.560 --> 0:15:47.840
<v Speaker 10>and probably you know, the earnings are going to grow

0:15:47.880 --> 0:15:48.600
<v Speaker 10>and catch up with a.

0:15:48.680 --> 0:15:53.120
<v Speaker 2>Multiple Ayako Yoshioka from the Wealth Enhancement Group, thank you

0:15:53.160 --> 0:16:00.280
<v Speaker 2>for joining us.

0:16:01.280 --> 0:16:04.120
<v Speaker 4>Elon Musk, who of course leads President Trump's government cost

0:16:04.200 --> 0:16:08.240
<v Speaker 4>cutting efforts, will determine himself if there are conflicts of

0:16:08.280 --> 0:16:11.920
<v Speaker 4>interest between his work reviewing federal spending and his overlapping

0:16:11.920 --> 0:16:14.520
<v Speaker 4>empire of six companies. So all, according to the White

0:16:14.520 --> 0:16:16.920
<v Speaker 4>House's bring in. Bloomberg News's reporter and co host of

0:16:16.960 --> 0:16:19.520
<v Speaker 4>the elon Ink podcast, Max Chafkins. So he's going to

0:16:19.600 --> 0:16:20.440
<v Speaker 4>be his own policeman.

0:16:20.840 --> 0:16:22.080
<v Speaker 9>He's going to be his own policeman.

0:16:22.120 --> 0:16:24.400
<v Speaker 11>And you know, while this is news because we've been

0:16:24.400 --> 0:16:26.480
<v Speaker 11>wondering all along, what is the plan here? I mean,

0:16:26.560 --> 0:16:30.440
<v Speaker 11>Musk has six companies, He is somebody who is his

0:16:30.640 --> 0:16:33.120
<v Speaker 11>empire's rife with conflicts of interest. So it was kind

0:16:33.120 --> 0:16:34.920
<v Speaker 11>of interesting to see how the White House was going

0:16:34.960 --> 0:16:37.560
<v Speaker 11>to handle this, and we're learning basically they're not going

0:16:37.600 --> 0:16:40.520
<v Speaker 11>to handle They're going to let Elon use his judgment,

0:16:40.720 --> 0:16:42.160
<v Speaker 11>which I think was the plan all along.

0:16:42.240 --> 0:16:43.080
<v Speaker 9>And I think.

0:16:42.920 --> 0:16:46.240
<v Speaker 11>Even listening to things that President Trump said when he

0:16:46.280 --> 0:16:48.920
<v Speaker 11>was on the Camp Trent pain Trail made clear that

0:16:49.080 --> 0:16:51.440
<v Speaker 11>part of the point here is the fact that Elon

0:16:51.520 --> 0:16:54.000
<v Speaker 11>Musk has these conflicts of interest. You know, Trump talked

0:16:54.040 --> 0:16:57.160
<v Speaker 11>all about Mars that that is a thing that would

0:16:57.360 --> 0:17:01.280
<v Speaker 11>necessarily involve some of Elon Musk's company. So so yeah,

0:17:01.280 --> 0:17:04.399
<v Speaker 11>we're sort of learning something that I think was pretty clear,

0:17:04.480 --> 0:17:05.720
<v Speaker 11>but we didn't know for sure.

0:17:06.800 --> 0:17:07.080
<v Speaker 9>Max.

0:17:07.119 --> 0:17:09.480
<v Speaker 2>I want to talk about the tech because Elon Musk

0:17:09.520 --> 0:17:11.680
<v Speaker 2>has said that he wants to use AI to find

0:17:11.720 --> 0:17:15.359
<v Speaker 2>cost savings, and he's already mining through medicare and medicaid

0:17:15.400 --> 0:17:18.040
<v Speaker 2>data in search of fraud and abuse. Do we know

0:17:18.160 --> 0:17:20.520
<v Speaker 2>if this is something he could use his own company

0:17:20.760 --> 0:17:21.840
<v Speaker 2>XAI to do.

0:17:22.440 --> 0:17:24.800
<v Speaker 9>We don't know what software they're using.

0:17:24.920 --> 0:17:27.080
<v Speaker 11>It would not surprise me at all if he was

0:17:27.200 --> 0:17:31.480
<v Speaker 11>using some modified version of GROC or you know, some

0:17:31.720 --> 0:17:35.040
<v Speaker 11>some software that he has developed, or is that you know,

0:17:35.119 --> 0:17:37.280
<v Speaker 11>is somehow associated with another one of his companies.

0:17:37.720 --> 0:17:39.040
<v Speaker 9>Musk has done this all the time.

0:17:39.040 --> 0:17:42.320
<v Speaker 11>We've seen you know, SpaceX engineers shuttled into Twitter.

0:17:42.800 --> 0:17:44.880
<v Speaker 9>We're seeing you know, people from his.

0:17:45.200 --> 0:17:49.240
<v Speaker 11>Business Empire now attached in various ways to this doje effort.

0:17:49.480 --> 0:17:53.040
<v Speaker 11>So yes, and of course that raises, you know, interesting questions.

0:17:53.040 --> 0:17:55.879
<v Speaker 11>Where is this data being stored? Are they taking the

0:17:55.960 --> 0:18:01.639
<v Speaker 11>proper precautions. We've definitely seen critics, including you know employees,

0:18:01.720 --> 0:18:04.560
<v Speaker 11>government employees, as well as some of their unions, raise

0:18:04.680 --> 0:18:08.080
<v Speaker 11>questions about this, you know, saying basically, is Elon Musk

0:18:08.520 --> 0:18:11.280
<v Speaker 11>taking enough care of our private data?

0:18:11.359 --> 0:18:14.280
<v Speaker 4>I wonder if investors are wondering whether they're taking enough

0:18:14.320 --> 0:18:18.840
<v Speaker 4>care of his fiduciaries responsibility to Tesla. It's currently down

0:18:19.080 --> 0:18:21.440
<v Speaker 4>almost ten percent on the beginning of the year.

0:18:21.800 --> 0:18:23.400
<v Speaker 3>We're training the lowest since December.

0:18:23.800 --> 0:18:26.200
<v Speaker 4>And meanwhile, he got byd in China announcing that it's

0:18:26.200 --> 0:18:29.359
<v Speaker 4>getting into autonomous vehicles potentially, and Tesla takes another hit.

0:18:29.520 --> 0:18:29.680
<v Speaker 9>Well.

0:18:29.680 --> 0:18:31.600
<v Speaker 11>So, if two things are definitely true, one is that

0:18:31.640 --> 0:18:34.280
<v Speaker 11>Elon Musk for sure is distracted. I mean, you know,

0:18:34.600 --> 0:18:37.440
<v Speaker 11>I understand that he has like an endless amount of

0:18:37.440 --> 0:18:39.920
<v Speaker 11>attention span. He's able to be very good at video

0:18:39.960 --> 0:18:42.439
<v Speaker 11>games while running sales companies. But if you look, he

0:18:42.480 --> 0:18:44.960
<v Speaker 11>has spent a ton of time in Washington, He's essentially

0:18:44.960 --> 0:18:47.400
<v Speaker 11>been parked there in recent weeks.

0:18:47.560 --> 0:18:50.639
<v Speaker 9>He's tweeting all day and all night about Doge.

0:18:51.160 --> 0:18:53.200
<v Speaker 11>That said, so in that sense, you might say, wow,

0:18:53.320 --> 0:18:55.040
<v Speaker 11>like these he's really distracted.

0:18:55.080 --> 0:18:56.240
<v Speaker 9>He's taking his eye off the ball.

0:18:56.520 --> 0:18:59.199
<v Speaker 11>On the other hand, there are clear ways that his

0:18:59.320 --> 0:19:02.800
<v Speaker 11>companies can benefit from this partnership, and I think most

0:19:02.800 --> 0:19:05.399
<v Speaker 11>investors understand that. And if you turn back the clock

0:19:05.440 --> 0:19:08.480
<v Speaker 11>on that stock chart to like the beginning of November,

0:19:08.560 --> 0:19:09.359
<v Speaker 11>you'll see that.

0:19:09.280 --> 0:19:10.960
<v Speaker 9>The stock is still way up.

0:19:11.040 --> 0:19:14.840
<v Speaker 11>So I think, yeah, some of the enthusiasms, some of

0:19:14.600 --> 0:19:17.679
<v Speaker 11>the sense that oh my god, this Trump trade is

0:19:17.720 --> 0:19:20.199
<v Speaker 11>like a home run, has worn off, although there are

0:19:20.240 --> 0:19:23.760
<v Speaker 11>definitely still people who see this as beneficial to Musk

0:19:23.920 --> 0:19:24.840
<v Speaker 11>and his companies.

0:19:25.560 --> 0:19:28.680
<v Speaker 3>That's Bloomberg's match. Chafkin, thanks for joining us.

0:19:28.920 --> 0:19:29.080
<v Speaker 5>Now.

0:19:29.160 --> 0:19:30.440
<v Speaker 3>Today's Tech in.

0:19:30.400 --> 0:19:33.480
<v Speaker 2>Depth newsletter takes a look at two different approaches in

0:19:33.520 --> 0:19:37.440
<v Speaker 2>Silicon Valley on defense and war in Europe. Bloomberg's Mark

0:19:37.480 --> 0:19:38.399
<v Speaker 2>Bergen has more.

0:19:38.880 --> 0:19:39.120
<v Speaker 9>Mark.

0:19:39.359 --> 0:19:43.000
<v Speaker 2>How are these conversations different in defense tech between the

0:19:43.119 --> 0:19:44.560
<v Speaker 2>US and Europe.

0:19:45.720 --> 0:19:47.280
<v Speaker 9>Yeah, I mean I was sort of jumping off.

0:19:47.280 --> 0:19:49.920
<v Speaker 12>We saw a really interesting hire this week from Andresa

0:19:49.960 --> 0:19:53.480
<v Speaker 12>in their American Dynamism Fund, which is their tech defense fund.

0:19:53.520 --> 0:19:56.600
<v Speaker 12>They hired Daniel Penny, who was Gross Perraps most famous

0:19:56.800 --> 0:19:59.920
<v Speaker 12>as he was involved in that choking incident in the subway.

0:20:00.080 --> 0:20:02.199
<v Speaker 12>He was cleared of homicide but kind of became this

0:20:02.320 --> 0:20:04.320
<v Speaker 12>cause celebrat and as far as they know, he's a

0:20:04.320 --> 0:20:07.120
<v Speaker 12>marine veteran. Didn't have it a track record as an investor,

0:20:07.440 --> 0:20:10.000
<v Speaker 12>but clearly something that vice We saw Vice President JD

0:20:10.119 --> 0:20:12.160
<v Speaker 12>Van's tweet about his excitement about this hire.

0:20:12.520 --> 0:20:15.040
<v Speaker 9>It's a signal for that firm, which.

0:20:14.840 --> 0:20:17.959
<v Speaker 12>Has been kind of really leading the vanguard of They

0:20:18.040 --> 0:20:21.560
<v Speaker 12>named the fund American Dynamism that they're leading in on

0:20:21.600 --> 0:20:26.320
<v Speaker 12>this new era of reforming the Pentagon. This proximity between

0:20:27.119 --> 0:20:30.640
<v Speaker 12>the Pentagon and Silicon Valley and in many ways this

0:20:30.680 --> 0:20:33.639
<v Speaker 12>is something that's very different than what's operated in the past,

0:20:33.680 --> 0:20:36.760
<v Speaker 12>where the Silicon valley and venture capitalists didn't really think

0:20:36.760 --> 0:20:38.000
<v Speaker 12>about global borders.

0:20:38.720 --> 0:20:41.960
<v Speaker 4>It's interesting David Ullivitch I interviewed a few weeks ago

0:20:42.040 --> 0:20:44.480
<v Speaker 4>Catherin Boyle also leading that over at A sixteen Z,

0:20:44.600 --> 0:20:48.040
<v Speaker 4>and they have been leaning into defense side Androil for example,

0:20:48.080 --> 0:20:51.600
<v Speaker 4>they're looking at nuclear security. What's interesting though, is last

0:20:51.600 --> 0:20:53.679
<v Speaker 4>time I saw it, A sixteen Z was pulling out

0:20:53.800 --> 0:20:55.719
<v Speaker 4>of London and it's office space there. So what does

0:20:55.760 --> 0:20:58.000
<v Speaker 4>that mean in terms of looking at bringing this across

0:20:58.000 --> 0:20:58.600
<v Speaker 4>the Atlantic.

0:21:00.080 --> 0:21:01.960
<v Speaker 12>Yeah, so, I mean to be clear that they shut

0:21:01.960 --> 0:21:04.439
<v Speaker 12>down their office, their first and only outside the US

0:21:04.720 --> 0:21:07.200
<v Speaker 12>that was a crypto investing arm. They still are making

0:21:07.200 --> 0:21:09.960
<v Speaker 12>some investments in Europe. They have a big position in Mistral,

0:21:10.040 --> 0:21:11.959
<v Speaker 12>the French AI company as far as I know, though,

0:21:12.000 --> 0:21:14.800
<v Speaker 12>they haven't made any investments on the defense side here,

0:21:15.080 --> 0:21:19.119
<v Speaker 12>where you've seen others like General Catalyst. Even Sequoia we've

0:21:19.200 --> 0:21:22.639
<v Speaker 12>reported has been looking. General Catalysts has been fairly aggressive

0:21:22.960 --> 0:21:25.760
<v Speaker 12>in defense in Europe. I mean, it's really interesting. Great

0:21:25.760 --> 0:21:28.240
<v Speaker 12>where Europe is in the middle of this war with Russia.

0:21:28.440 --> 0:21:31.320
<v Speaker 12>You go to these events in Europe, you hear constantly

0:21:31.320 --> 0:21:33.920
<v Speaker 12>about Russia and they need to defend itself. And then

0:21:34.000 --> 0:21:35.919
<v Speaker 12>you have events in the US and I think the

0:21:35.960 --> 0:21:38.680
<v Speaker 12>focus has been shifted to China and Taiwan.

0:21:39.240 --> 0:21:42.240
<v Speaker 4>And meanwhile Palent his own sales internationally were lower in

0:21:42.560 --> 0:21:45.080
<v Speaker 4>weakness in Europe. Matt Bergen, it's great to have you

0:21:45.280 --> 0:21:48.439
<v Speaker 4>go read his Tech in Depth newsletter. In's course from

0:21:48.440 --> 0:21:51.280
<v Speaker 4>Bloomberg's journalists around the world. You can subscribe at blomberg

0:21:51.320 --> 0:22:01.479
<v Speaker 4>dot com slash Newsletters. Welcome back to bloombag Technology. I'm

0:22:01.520 --> 0:22:04.679
<v Speaker 4>Caroline hid in New York. Now, Vanguard has slashed the

0:22:04.720 --> 0:22:08.080
<v Speaker 4>fees for dozens of its mutual funds and ETFs this week,

0:22:08.240 --> 0:22:10.600
<v Speaker 4>in a record move that sent a shockwave through the

0:22:10.640 --> 0:22:14.320
<v Speaker 4>asset management industry. The reduction is the largest Vanguard has

0:22:14.359 --> 0:22:17.200
<v Speaker 4>ever undertaken. For more now on the impact on black

0:22:17.240 --> 0:22:20.720
<v Speaker 4>Rock on Invesco, Bloomberg's Katie Greifeld is standing by for more.

0:22:20.800 --> 0:22:26.000
<v Speaker 8>Katie, we welcome now our TV and radio audiences worldwide,

0:22:26.040 --> 0:22:28.600
<v Speaker 8>and please to say We're joined by Vanguard CEO Salem

0:22:28.680 --> 0:22:32.520
<v Speaker 8>Ramji in an exclusive conversation Slim, great to have you

0:22:32.600 --> 0:22:35.360
<v Speaker 8>with us. So we all saw the report to be here, Katie,

0:22:35.480 --> 0:22:38.080
<v Speaker 8>thank you. We saw the ripple effects from Monday's move,

0:22:38.119 --> 0:22:42.600
<v Speaker 8>and your average female is just seven basis points across

0:22:42.640 --> 0:22:45.520
<v Speaker 8>your line of the industry average for contexts forty four

0:22:45.560 --> 0:22:47.600
<v Speaker 8>basis points set the scene for us.

0:22:47.640 --> 0:22:52.440
<v Speaker 13>Why now, well, you know, in one sense, I will

0:22:52.480 --> 0:22:54.880
<v Speaker 13>say Monday was a pretty joyous day here at Vanguard,

0:22:55.840 --> 0:22:59.080
<v Speaker 13>and it was joyous figures. It really is a reaffirmation

0:22:59.119 --> 0:23:03.159
<v Speaker 13>of our business model. We're owned by our clients, and

0:23:03.200 --> 0:23:07.520
<v Speaker 13>so as a result, as we gain scale economies here

0:23:07.560 --> 0:23:10.200
<v Speaker 13>at the company, we share those back with our clients.

0:23:10.640 --> 0:23:12.760
<v Speaker 13>And that's not just been true since Monday, It's been

0:23:12.760 --> 0:23:16.560
<v Speaker 13>true since nineteen seventy five, since when we founded the company.

0:23:16.560 --> 0:23:20.560
<v Speaker 13>And so this was continuing on a two thousand price

0:23:20.600 --> 0:23:23.320
<v Speaker 13>cuts I think by our tally as of last week

0:23:23.960 --> 0:23:27.840
<v Speaker 13>now it's twenty one hundred and sixty eight price cuts.

0:23:27.920 --> 0:23:31.280
<v Speaker 13>And that's been part of the proposition that investors have

0:23:31.359 --> 0:23:33.160
<v Speaker 13>had with Vanguard for decades.

0:23:33.800 --> 0:23:36.080
<v Speaker 8>And so Salim, I think I'm asking on part of

0:23:36.119 --> 0:23:39.120
<v Speaker 8>your competitors but also investors as well, when I ask

0:23:39.520 --> 0:23:42.679
<v Speaker 8>how low can fees go? You're at seven basis points

0:23:43.000 --> 0:23:44.760
<v Speaker 8>right now? Where is the possible floor?

0:23:44.800 --> 0:23:45.040
<v Speaker 5>Here.

0:23:47.080 --> 0:23:50.879
<v Speaker 13>Well, you know, we don't price products as loss leaders.

0:23:51.320 --> 0:23:54.639
<v Speaker 13>We're not looking to you know, price abnormally low in

0:23:54.720 --> 0:23:58.600
<v Speaker 13>order to get somebody into a higher cost other service.

0:23:59.280 --> 0:24:01.520
<v Speaker 13>And so we really look at it across the board

0:24:01.560 --> 0:24:04.080
<v Speaker 13>in terms of our scale economies. We want to deliver

0:24:04.280 --> 0:24:09.000
<v Speaker 13>great quality and great performance, and I think that the

0:24:09.040 --> 0:24:13.360
<v Speaker 13>thing that sometimes gets lost in the mix. Obviously, index

0:24:13.400 --> 0:24:16.560
<v Speaker 13>prices have been coming down for quite some time, led

0:24:16.600 --> 0:24:20.919
<v Speaker 13>by us over the past several decades. But sometimes it

0:24:20.920 --> 0:24:25.280
<v Speaker 13>gets confused that we were all about index. We're actually

0:24:25.320 --> 0:24:28.360
<v Speaker 13>about active and index. And really, if you go back

0:24:28.359 --> 0:24:32.040
<v Speaker 13>to our origins, what Bogel was against was high fees,

0:24:32.720 --> 0:24:37.520
<v Speaker 13>and so active management at a low fee can really

0:24:37.560 --> 0:24:41.600
<v Speaker 13>outperform over the long term if delivered with the right quality.

0:24:42.040 --> 0:24:45.520
<v Speaker 13>That was Bogel's hypothesis in the seventies and eighties, And

0:24:45.600 --> 0:24:47.439
<v Speaker 13>if you look at our track record, even just in

0:24:47.520 --> 0:24:52.000
<v Speaker 13>something like active fixed income, the empirical evidence backs up

0:24:52.000 --> 0:24:55.240
<v Speaker 13>that hypothesis that he had way back then. Ninety one

0:24:55.280 --> 0:24:58.960
<v Speaker 13>percent of our active fixed income outperforms its peers over

0:24:59.000 --> 0:25:01.879
<v Speaker 13>the past ten years. And one of the reasons why

0:25:02.440 --> 0:25:05.480
<v Speaker 13>is because we price it at just over ten basis points,

0:25:06.480 --> 0:25:08.840
<v Speaker 13>and so at a very low fee. And you know,

0:25:08.880 --> 0:25:11.600
<v Speaker 13>when you speak to our fixed income team, to Sarah Devereux,

0:25:11.640 --> 0:25:15.879
<v Speaker 13>our CIO, and our teams who run our active fixed income,

0:25:16.720 --> 0:25:20.040
<v Speaker 13>part of the reason they're able to outperform is they

0:25:20.040 --> 0:25:22.679
<v Speaker 13>have a much lower headwind from higher fees, and so

0:25:22.680 --> 0:25:25.600
<v Speaker 13>they're able to take risks in a much better and

0:25:25.640 --> 0:25:28.680
<v Speaker 13>more disciplined way. And so what this is really about

0:25:28.840 --> 0:25:33.119
<v Speaker 13>is not just about delivering high quality index management, but

0:25:33.200 --> 0:25:37.600
<v Speaker 13>it's really about delivering high quality investment management at a

0:25:37.680 --> 0:25:39.480
<v Speaker 13>very low fee. And I think whether you're looking at

0:25:39.520 --> 0:25:42.720
<v Speaker 13>active fixed income or whether you're looking at index fixed

0:25:42.760 --> 0:25:45.320
<v Speaker 13>income or index equities, that's really what we've been.

0:25:45.240 --> 0:25:47.320
<v Speaker 8>About, right, Well, Selma, you make the point that a

0:25:47.359 --> 0:25:49.680
<v Speaker 8>lot of people probably think of Vanguard and they don't

0:25:49.720 --> 0:25:53.240
<v Speaker 8>think of active. And you do, have, of course active

0:25:53.240 --> 0:25:55.879
<v Speaker 8>funds out there, but it's a pretty small percentage of

0:25:55.880 --> 0:25:58.280
<v Speaker 8>your overall lineup. Especially if you take a look at

0:25:58.320 --> 0:26:01.000
<v Speaker 8>the ETF side of things, we expect to see more

0:26:01.080 --> 0:26:02.399
<v Speaker 8>active fund launches from you.

0:26:04.440 --> 0:26:06.960
<v Speaker 13>Yeah, you know, our active management the first Vanguard funds

0:26:06.960 --> 0:26:09.879
<v Speaker 13>are actually active funds if you go back to the

0:26:09.880 --> 0:26:14.760
<v Speaker 13>seventies and both we manage our active fixed income within Vanguard.

0:26:15.200 --> 0:26:19.040
<v Speaker 13>We have a whole range of partners subadvisors that we

0:26:19.119 --> 0:26:23.800
<v Speaker 13>work with for our fundamental active equities, and they're unified

0:26:23.800 --> 0:26:26.240
<v Speaker 13>by the principle of being high quality at a low price.

0:26:27.280 --> 0:26:30.679
<v Speaker 13>And yeah, Katie, you already have seen us doing a

0:26:30.680 --> 0:26:34.080
<v Speaker 13>lot more in active ETFs and I think you've seen

0:26:34.119 --> 0:26:38.359
<v Speaker 13>that pick up over the past several months, and I

0:26:38.359 --> 0:26:41.200
<v Speaker 13>hope and expect that that will continue over the next

0:26:41.760 --> 0:26:43.320
<v Speaker 13>you know, this year and next.

0:26:43.160 --> 0:26:45.640
<v Speaker 8>Year, all right, so we'll keep an eye out for that.

0:26:45.800 --> 0:26:47.800
<v Speaker 8>You were talking a little bit about, of course, how

0:26:47.920 --> 0:26:51.760
<v Speaker 8>the ownership structure works at Vanguard. How basically all a

0:26:51.800 --> 0:26:54.080
<v Speaker 8>lot of the extra cash, the extra assets that you

0:26:54.160 --> 0:26:57.439
<v Speaker 8>generate are funneled towards these fee cuts. But I'm curious

0:26:57.480 --> 0:27:00.280
<v Speaker 8>from where you sit, how do you balance slow boring

0:27:00.359 --> 0:27:03.439
<v Speaker 8>fees versus investing in the business. What does that decision

0:27:03.480 --> 0:27:04.080
<v Speaker 8>tree look like.

0:27:06.080 --> 0:27:09.800
<v Speaker 13>Yeah, it's something we do very carefully here. And you know,

0:27:10.080 --> 0:27:13.520
<v Speaker 13>this week is all about our fee cuts and giving

0:27:13.560 --> 0:27:15.639
<v Speaker 13>back to our clients in the form of lower fees.

0:27:16.400 --> 0:27:20.120
<v Speaker 13>We've also stepped up our investments in things like technology.

0:27:20.920 --> 0:27:23.520
<v Speaker 13>That's something that really began about two three years ago

0:27:24.040 --> 0:27:27.800
<v Speaker 13>and is continuing this year and next year, because we're

0:27:27.800 --> 0:27:30.840
<v Speaker 13>always trying to balance making sure that we've got high

0:27:30.920 --> 0:27:34.960
<v Speaker 13>quality products at a low cost and we're delivering the

0:27:35.000 --> 0:27:37.600
<v Speaker 13>right level of service to clients. We're investing in newer

0:27:37.640 --> 0:27:41.240
<v Speaker 13>technologies to make our investing even more efficient, to make

0:27:41.280 --> 0:27:44.159
<v Speaker 13>our client interfaces even more efficient. So that's always a

0:27:44.160 --> 0:27:46.119
<v Speaker 13>balancing act here at Vanguard, just like it is at

0:27:46.119 --> 0:27:48.800
<v Speaker 13>many companies in terms of how do we think for

0:27:48.880 --> 0:27:51.680
<v Speaker 13>the near term and how do we think for the

0:27:51.840 --> 0:27:55.119
<v Speaker 13>medium to longer term. But I'd say one of the

0:27:55.160 --> 0:27:57.520
<v Speaker 13>beauties of Vanguard. I think part of the original genius

0:27:57.520 --> 0:28:01.600
<v Speaker 13>of Vanguard is that when you know we've got a surplus,

0:28:01.680 --> 0:28:04.159
<v Speaker 13>after we've looked at the important investments we need to

0:28:04.160 --> 0:28:08.120
<v Speaker 13>make back in things like technology, the way we give

0:28:08.240 --> 0:28:10.439
<v Speaker 13>back to our owners is through lower fees. And I

0:28:10.440 --> 0:28:12.600
<v Speaker 13>think that's the Vanguard effect that you've been seeing for

0:28:12.680 --> 0:28:14.760
<v Speaker 13>decades all across the company.

0:28:15.160 --> 0:28:18.160
<v Speaker 8>Yeah, that Vanguard effect obviously a good news story for

0:28:18.200 --> 0:28:20.879
<v Speaker 8>your investors, maybe not for your competitors. But I do

0:28:20.960 --> 0:28:22.600
<v Speaker 8>want to talk about the future, and I want to

0:28:22.640 --> 0:28:26.119
<v Speaker 8>talk specifically about private markets and alts. One of the

0:28:26.200 --> 0:28:28.520
<v Speaker 8>big take stories that we have on the terminal right

0:28:28.560 --> 0:28:31.080
<v Speaker 8>now is about PIMCO and fears that PIMCO might be

0:28:31.080 --> 0:28:33.760
<v Speaker 8>falling behind in alts because you take a look at

0:28:33.800 --> 0:28:35.800
<v Speaker 8>the industry right now and a lot of your peers

0:28:36.040 --> 0:28:40.040
<v Speaker 8>have invested heavily in alts in privates to scale up there.

0:28:40.360 --> 0:28:42.800
<v Speaker 8>What is your plan when it comes to those areas

0:28:43.040 --> 0:28:45.080
<v Speaker 8>and do you fear that you're a little bit behind

0:28:45.120 --> 0:28:45.560
<v Speaker 8>right now?

0:28:47.600 --> 0:28:50.520
<v Speaker 13>Well one of the again one of the great benefits

0:28:50.520 --> 0:28:52.720
<v Speaker 13>of our business model, if you go back to the

0:28:52.760 --> 0:28:56.840
<v Speaker 13>origin we had subadvisors. You know, for example, at our

0:28:56.840 --> 0:29:01.440
<v Speaker 13>beginning we are and are still subs by Wellington Management,

0:29:02.280 --> 0:29:06.000
<v Speaker 13>which is still our largest subadvisor today. And so where

0:29:06.040 --> 0:29:10.680
<v Speaker 13>we don't have capabilities within kind of vanguard, we've long

0:29:10.720 --> 0:29:12.560
<v Speaker 13>had an ability to partner.

0:29:12.160 --> 0:29:12.960
<v Speaker 5>With other firms.

0:29:13.520 --> 0:29:17.200
<v Speaker 13>To date, we've generally done that in fundamental active equities,

0:29:18.320 --> 0:29:21.400
<v Speaker 13>but we can do it in things like private markets,

0:29:21.440 --> 0:29:24.480
<v Speaker 13>and there's lots of discussions and explorations we have underway

0:29:25.120 --> 0:29:28.000
<v Speaker 13>to see what's possible. But you know, our north star

0:29:28.560 --> 0:29:32.920
<v Speaker 13>is always about what's right for our clients, and it's

0:29:32.960 --> 0:29:36.640
<v Speaker 13>making sure that whatever it is we do inactive in

0:29:36.640 --> 0:29:40.520
<v Speaker 13>index ourselves or with others, that we keep in mind

0:29:40.560 --> 0:29:43.360
<v Speaker 13>that we're about simplicity, We're about low cost and we're

0:29:43.360 --> 0:29:46.040
<v Speaker 13>about long term returns, and I think that there are

0:29:46.120 --> 0:29:48.840
<v Speaker 13>constructs that will allow private markets to fit in that.

0:29:49.800 --> 0:29:52.000
<v Speaker 13>But that's really part of the exploration that we're doing

0:29:52.000 --> 0:29:53.720
<v Speaker 13>because whatever it is we do, we want to do

0:29:53.760 --> 0:29:56.160
<v Speaker 13>it the Vanguard way, and we want to do it

0:29:56.160 --> 0:29:59.480
<v Speaker 13>in a way that's well suited to our client base,

0:29:59.520 --> 0:30:01.680
<v Speaker 13>which is really looking to us for a certain set

0:30:01.720 --> 0:30:04.800
<v Speaker 13>of things that we've consistently delivered over the years.

0:30:05.000 --> 0:30:06.760
<v Speaker 8>All right, Seleem got to leave it there. I really

0:30:06.840 --> 0:30:09.960
<v Speaker 8>appreciate you taking the time. That is Vanguard's CEO Selim

0:30:10.040 --> 0:30:11.360
<v Speaker 8>Ramj back to.

0:30:11.320 --> 0:30:13.560
<v Speaker 3>You, Katie.

0:30:13.640 --> 0:30:16.000
<v Speaker 4>We get a quick check on these markets. Great interview.

0:30:16.240 --> 0:30:18.800
<v Speaker 4>Let's dig into what's happening in technology right now because.

0:30:18.680 --> 0:30:19.680
<v Speaker 3>Nasak just clinging on too.

0:30:19.720 --> 0:30:21.760
<v Speaker 4>Gains only by about a tenth of percent on the

0:30:21.840 --> 0:30:24.440
<v Speaker 4>higher side, and video powers us up from a points perspective,

0:30:24.480 --> 0:30:26.720
<v Speaker 4>as maybe JP Morgan wais in and says, hey, maybe

0:30:26.760 --> 0:30:29.040
<v Speaker 4>these open source deep seat models on as bad as

0:30:29.040 --> 0:30:30.520
<v Speaker 4>we thought. But you move on to what's happening on

0:30:30.560 --> 0:30:33.520
<v Speaker 4>the downside, and Qualcomm a key significant draw down in

0:30:33.560 --> 0:30:34.280
<v Speaker 4>a points perspective.

0:30:34.280 --> 0:30:35.560
<v Speaker 3>We're off almost five percent.

0:30:35.960 --> 0:30:38.040
<v Speaker 4>This is the worst day that's November the twentieth for

0:30:38.080 --> 0:30:41.080
<v Speaker 4>the stock, even as they managed to beat expectations when

0:30:41.120 --> 0:30:43.440
<v Speaker 4>they come for their earnings in revenue and in earnings

0:30:43.440 --> 0:30:45.920
<v Speaker 4>for share revenue up some eighteen percent. But we're worried

0:30:45.920 --> 0:30:48.760
<v Speaker 4>about the future of the smartphone market, to which Qualcom

0:30:48.760 --> 0:30:51.800
<v Speaker 4>of course is so exposed. Skyworks also on the downside,

0:30:51.960 --> 0:30:55.480
<v Speaker 4>after we see its issues around iPhone representing eighty five

0:30:55.520 --> 0:30:58.080
<v Speaker 4>percent of its business more broadly, and they're having to

0:30:58.160 --> 0:31:00.600
<v Speaker 4>reduce the content loss that they're seeing at the moment.

0:31:00.680 --> 0:31:03.400
<v Speaker 4>iPhone content lost to Skyworks work by twenty four percent.

0:31:03.840 --> 0:31:07.800
<v Speaker 2>Jackie coming up as demand for China's deep so you

0:31:07.840 --> 0:31:12.480
<v Speaker 2>can other open eye source AI models skyrocket, National security

0:31:12.480 --> 0:31:16.160
<v Speaker 2>concerns emerge. We speak to Ben Harberg of Core Values Alpha.

0:31:16.440 --> 0:31:32.080
<v Speaker 2>This is Bloomberg. The rise of AI chatbots and what

0:31:32.120 --> 0:31:36.400
<v Speaker 2>they can bring to productivity is spurring enthusiasm across global industries.

0:31:36.520 --> 0:31:39.680
<v Speaker 2>Bloomberg spoke with riied Hoffman of Greylock Partners. Here's what

0:31:39.720 --> 0:31:42.320
<v Speaker 2>he had to say about utilizing AI in the workforce.

0:31:43.600 --> 0:31:47.320
<v Speaker 14>I actually think programming skill jobs aren't going out the door.

0:31:47.360 --> 0:31:49.600
<v Speaker 14>I think there's human application, but I think it's also

0:31:49.680 --> 0:31:53.200
<v Speaker 14>human application of like EQ as well. So the fact

0:31:53.240 --> 0:31:56.800
<v Speaker 14>that you have a for example, say a medical assistant

0:31:56.880 --> 0:31:58.720
<v Speaker 14>that can help you with something, or a coach that

0:31:58.800 --> 0:32:00.640
<v Speaker 14>might be able to talk to something, doesn't mean you

0:32:00.640 --> 0:32:01.640
<v Speaker 14>don't want a human coach.

0:32:01.960 --> 0:32:03.360
<v Speaker 9>It's more coaches, the better.

0:32:03.680 --> 0:32:05.560
<v Speaker 3>Greid Hoffman of green Up partners there.

0:32:05.680 --> 0:32:07.560
<v Speaker 4>And of course, with the rise of AI chatbots with

0:32:07.640 --> 0:32:10.760
<v Speaker 4>open source models, China based Deep Seek of course is

0:32:10.760 --> 0:32:13.440
<v Speaker 4>actually having to restrict access to its models. Is demand

0:32:13.480 --> 0:32:16.400
<v Speaker 4>overwhelmed server capacity? More in the future of AI open

0:32:16.440 --> 0:32:18.280
<v Speaker 4>source models tech competition with China.

0:32:18.400 --> 0:32:19.640
<v Speaker 3>We're joined by Ben Harveack.

0:32:19.800 --> 0:32:22.080
<v Speaker 4>He is founder at Core Values Alpha and managing partner

0:32:22.120 --> 0:32:24.080
<v Speaker 4>of Nova Capital, which has a call two billion dollars

0:32:24.080 --> 0:32:27.400
<v Speaker 4>in assets under management. We also know that you oversee

0:32:27.400 --> 0:32:29.960
<v Speaker 4>a greater China growth ETF, so we're here for all

0:32:29.960 --> 0:32:33.320
<v Speaker 4>of your expertise. And ultimately, was Deep seekersputneck moment.

0:32:33.240 --> 0:32:34.480
<v Speaker 5>I think it was. I think you know.

0:32:34.560 --> 0:32:39.920
<v Speaker 15>It challenged this hubris and this impenetrability of American AI leadership.

0:32:39.960 --> 0:32:40.880
<v Speaker 9>And the scary thing.

0:32:40.800 --> 0:32:42.800
<v Speaker 15>Was we already saw the Chinese kind of tacking global

0:32:42.800 --> 0:32:45.560
<v Speaker 15>market share when it came to all the kind of

0:32:45.560 --> 0:32:49.959
<v Speaker 15>next generation technologies being electric vehicles, drones, solar panels, and

0:32:50.000 --> 0:32:52.720
<v Speaker 15>this was really the last holdout, and so with that

0:32:52.800 --> 0:32:54.800
<v Speaker 15>bubble being pierced, I think we need to now put

0:32:54.800 --> 0:32:57.520
<v Speaker 15>our foot on the gas and re examine our own

0:32:57.560 --> 0:33:01.400
<v Speaker 15>capabilities and how do we continue to lead in that market?

0:33:02.760 --> 0:33:06.120
<v Speaker 2>Ben, what's the starting point here? What should companies be

0:33:06.200 --> 0:33:08.520
<v Speaker 2>focused on in the wake of deep Seat. We're hearing

0:33:08.560 --> 0:33:11.840
<v Speaker 2>a lot of talk about expanding infrastructure. You saw open

0:33:11.880 --> 0:33:14.640
<v Speaker 2>AI and veil new models just a couple of days

0:33:14.760 --> 0:33:17.280
<v Speaker 2>after the news hit. What should be the focus for

0:33:17.360 --> 0:33:18.520
<v Speaker 2>AI startups in the US?

0:33:18.920 --> 0:33:21.080
<v Speaker 15>I think a space race is great for a competition,

0:33:21.120 --> 0:33:24.040
<v Speaker 15>and it's great for American innovation, and so I hope

0:33:24.040 --> 0:33:26.320
<v Speaker 15>we don't take this as a slight instead use it

0:33:26.320 --> 0:33:29.960
<v Speaker 15>as a motivator. Obviously, AI is a discipline that requires

0:33:29.960 --> 0:33:36.280
<v Speaker 15>a huge interdisciplinary kind of collaboration across energy, talent, technology,

0:33:36.680 --> 0:33:41.400
<v Speaker 15>regulatory availability and all you know, and the open source

0:33:41.480 --> 0:33:43.600
<v Speaker 15>nature of models, and so my view is that this

0:33:43.640 --> 0:33:45.400
<v Speaker 15>has to be a whole country effort. We should be

0:33:45.480 --> 0:33:48.360
<v Speaker 15>looking at this more as a Manhattan Project two point zero,

0:33:48.400 --> 0:33:50.200
<v Speaker 15>where we bring all those factors to bear. And I

0:33:50.200 --> 0:33:53.400
<v Speaker 15>think that the new Trump administration is really looking hard,

0:33:53.400 --> 0:33:56.080
<v Speaker 15>particularly at the regulatory front. How do we stimulate that

0:33:56.240 --> 0:33:57.920
<v Speaker 15>and support on the energy front. You heard this one

0:33:57.960 --> 0:34:02.840
<v Speaker 15>hundred billion dollar number coming out of Open AI and others.

0:34:03.000 --> 0:34:05.240
<v Speaker 15>So I think we need to bring all those together

0:34:05.760 --> 0:34:07.160
<v Speaker 15>and to put our foot on the gas.

0:34:07.600 --> 0:34:10.279
<v Speaker 4>You were pretty heavily involved in the Trump campaign. Are

0:34:10.280 --> 0:34:11.360
<v Speaker 4>they asking you for advice?

0:34:12.280 --> 0:34:15.520
<v Speaker 15>I've done my best, So I've certainly believed that in

0:34:16.000 --> 0:34:17.719
<v Speaker 15>the current environment, we need to put our foot on

0:34:17.760 --> 0:34:20.560
<v Speaker 15>the gas when it comes to extending American technology leadership,

0:34:20.560 --> 0:34:23.480
<v Speaker 15>and that is an interdisciplinary process. Requires that we bring

0:34:23.520 --> 0:34:31.120
<v Speaker 15>together immigration, energy rethinking, education of course, permitting and regulatory reform,

0:34:31.160 --> 0:34:33.680
<v Speaker 15>and subsidies and technology, and so we have to bring

0:34:33.719 --> 0:34:35.319
<v Speaker 15>all these things to bear. And so my advice to

0:34:35.360 --> 0:34:37.600
<v Speaker 15>them has to kind of draw down these walls of

0:34:37.600 --> 0:34:42.320
<v Speaker 15>bureaucracy and siloed different departments and instead kind of get interdisciplinary,

0:34:42.640 --> 0:34:45.439
<v Speaker 15>interagency working groups together. We don't just need a ZAR

0:34:45.520 --> 0:34:48.400
<v Speaker 15>for AI and crypto, We need zars for shipbuilding, drones,

0:34:48.480 --> 0:34:49.960
<v Speaker 15>hypersonic missiles, et cetera.

0:34:50.440 --> 0:34:53.840
<v Speaker 4>What's so interesting about the Great China Growth etf The

0:34:53.920 --> 0:34:55.560
<v Speaker 4>tagline if you go on to have a look, is

0:34:55.560 --> 0:34:59.080
<v Speaker 4>it accessing China alpha without compromising American national security or

0:34:59.120 --> 0:34:59.960
<v Speaker 4>American values.

0:35:00.680 --> 0:35:01.799
<v Speaker 3>How do you.

0:35:01.920 --> 0:35:05.840
<v Speaker 4>Invest in a BYD when suddenly news of potentially BYD

0:35:05.920 --> 0:35:08.760
<v Speaker 4>having autonomous vehicles sends TESA shares down and the biggest

0:35:08.760 --> 0:35:09.680
<v Speaker 4>points drag on the day.

0:35:09.880 --> 0:35:10.080
<v Speaker 5>Yeah.

0:35:10.120 --> 0:35:11.960
<v Speaker 15>So our strapline from a year and a half ago,

0:35:12.000 --> 0:35:13.840
<v Speaker 15>which I think we preempted the market a bit, was

0:35:13.840 --> 0:35:16.960
<v Speaker 15>America First Equities investing. We know people still wanted to

0:35:17.000 --> 0:35:18.400
<v Speaker 15>access China, and we knew one of the things that

0:35:18.480 --> 0:35:20.120
<v Speaker 15>was scaring them away from China was a fear that

0:35:20.200 --> 0:35:22.080
<v Speaker 15>they would be investing in companies that might show up

0:35:22.080 --> 0:35:24.440
<v Speaker 15>on a blacklist or a gray list. We also identified

0:35:24.440 --> 0:35:27.399
<v Speaker 15>their biggest competitor, k Web was CCP owned, so it's

0:35:27.440 --> 0:35:31.080
<v Speaker 15>owned by CICC, which is an SOE asset manager of

0:35:31.080 --> 0:35:33.239
<v Speaker 15>the Chinese government. And so we first determined that we

0:35:33.239 --> 0:35:35.320
<v Speaker 15>could be American owned entity and so we wouldn't have

0:35:35.320 --> 0:35:38.080
<v Speaker 15>any influence from the Chinese government. Second, we'd filter our

0:35:38.160 --> 0:35:40.880
<v Speaker 15>equities by looking at what was coming out of Congress,

0:35:40.880 --> 0:35:43.640
<v Speaker 15>what was coming out of Treasury and Commerce in terms

0:35:43.680 --> 0:35:46.399
<v Speaker 15>of entities lists, gray lists, and then we would even

0:35:46.440 --> 0:35:48.800
<v Speaker 15>go a step further and bring in former government officials

0:35:48.800 --> 0:35:50.520
<v Speaker 15>to kind of vet these names and ensure that they

0:35:50.520 --> 0:35:53.560
<v Speaker 15>weren't compromising American national security or value. So working with

0:35:53.600 --> 0:35:58.160
<v Speaker 15>the PLA, working with organizations that were involved in slave labor,

0:35:58.160 --> 0:36:00.920
<v Speaker 15>some other form of American values.

0:36:01.840 --> 0:36:04.920
<v Speaker 2>Ben, let's stick with your point about access to China.

0:36:05.080 --> 0:36:08.240
<v Speaker 2>Do you expect this administration to take a tougher stance

0:36:08.719 --> 0:36:13.080
<v Speaker 2>on curtailing VC's ability to invest in Chinese companies?

0:36:13.719 --> 0:36:16.160
<v Speaker 15>I think it will. So they call that the Overseas

0:36:16.160 --> 0:36:19.960
<v Speaker 15>Investment Program the OIP coming out of Treasury. I think

0:36:19.960 --> 0:36:21.919
<v Speaker 15>that that program needs to be expanded and be made

0:36:21.920 --> 0:36:24.880
<v Speaker 15>more concrete. Over the Biden administration, it was more of

0:36:24.880 --> 0:36:27.960
<v Speaker 15>a reporting mechanism certain something that dissuaded a lot of capital,

0:36:28.000 --> 0:36:31.160
<v Speaker 15>but didn't specifically restrict it. I do believe that American

0:36:31.160 --> 0:36:34.000
<v Speaker 15>money should be used to develop American innovation, and so

0:36:34.680 --> 0:36:36.479
<v Speaker 15>to the extent that we can keep money at home

0:36:36.520 --> 0:36:39.000
<v Speaker 15>and use it to build the next generation of open ais,

0:36:39.080 --> 0:36:42.560
<v Speaker 15>the next generation of electric vehicles, of drone companies, of

0:36:42.600 --> 0:36:46.440
<v Speaker 15>next generation military defense, that's a critical use of that capital.

0:36:46.400 --> 0:36:48.480
<v Speaker 15>And so I hope to see that program made more

0:36:48.480 --> 0:36:51.399
<v Speaker 15>concrete and expanded. At the same time, I think China

0:36:51.440 --> 0:36:53.080
<v Speaker 15>and the United States are going to be in better

0:36:53.160 --> 0:36:55.440
<v Speaker 15>kind of collaboration when it comes to just day to

0:36:55.520 --> 0:36:58.759
<v Speaker 15>day business dynamics, because there's a lot of the intractable

0:36:58.800 --> 0:37:01.360
<v Speaker 15>issues and fears that were kind of getting in the

0:37:01.400 --> 0:37:05.040
<v Speaker 15>way and wedging during the last administration are no longer there,

0:37:05.040 --> 0:37:07.200
<v Speaker 15>and this is much more of a dollars and cents conversation.

0:37:08.440 --> 0:37:12.840
<v Speaker 2>Well, sticking with policy here, immigration and H ONEB visas

0:37:12.840 --> 0:37:14.680
<v Speaker 2>are also a bit up in the air as it

0:37:14.719 --> 0:37:17.799
<v Speaker 2>relates to AI. AI depends a lot on those two

0:37:17.920 --> 0:37:20.680
<v Speaker 2>things to be able to fuel its pipeline of talent.

0:37:20.880 --> 0:37:22.280
<v Speaker 3>A lot of this talent is coming from.

0:37:22.160 --> 0:37:25.200
<v Speaker 2>Outside the US. Do you think that the administration's position

0:37:25.640 --> 0:37:28.439
<v Speaker 2>could actually undercut our efforts to stain the lead in AI.

0:37:29.160 --> 0:37:30.759
<v Speaker 15>There's clearly a bit of a split here, and we

0:37:30.760 --> 0:37:32.640
<v Speaker 15>saw that battle a few weeks ago that really played

0:37:32.640 --> 0:37:34.920
<v Speaker 15>out over Twitter, and the President i think reaffirmed his

0:37:35.000 --> 0:37:37.239
<v Speaker 15>commitment to the H one B one program. I think

0:37:37.320 --> 0:37:38.919
<v Speaker 15>we need to look at that as a stop gap.

0:37:38.960 --> 0:37:41.560
<v Speaker 15>Clearly one of America's greatest advantages that we attracted the

0:37:41.560 --> 0:37:45.240
<v Speaker 15>world's best minds to our shores through our university system,

0:37:45.520 --> 0:37:48.160
<v Speaker 15>but education as a whole in America needs to be reformed.

0:37:48.160 --> 0:37:50.000
<v Speaker 15>We need to look at maybe, for instance, the German

0:37:50.040 --> 0:37:53.440
<v Speaker 15>model of trade schools, hulk Schule's gymnaseums, where we split

0:37:53.520 --> 0:37:56.240
<v Speaker 15>kids off much earlier and send them to trade schools

0:37:56.239 --> 0:37:58.279
<v Speaker 15>where they can learn a lot of those tooling and

0:37:58.400 --> 0:38:00.840
<v Speaker 15>mechanic type roles that can be brought to bear in

0:38:00.920 --> 0:38:04.320
<v Speaker 15>these next generation technologies, be it defense, American kind of

0:38:04.320 --> 0:38:06.839
<v Speaker 15>smart manufacturing, et cetera. And so I think we need

0:38:06.880 --> 0:38:08.880
<v Speaker 15>to look deeply at education as a whole and not

0:38:09.000 --> 0:38:11.440
<v Speaker 15>just rely on foreign talent as a stopgap, but think

0:38:11.440 --> 0:38:14.600
<v Speaker 15>about how we start training American born citizens for next

0:38:14.640 --> 0:38:16.320
<v Speaker 15>generation technology enabled roles.

0:38:16.840 --> 0:38:20.640
<v Speaker 4>What's interesting is when you were saying you foresaw almost

0:38:20.680 --> 0:38:24.000
<v Speaker 4>this America first idea of investing in China, you understood

0:38:24.080 --> 0:38:25.759
<v Speaker 4>what was potentially going to end up on a gray

0:38:25.760 --> 0:38:28.279
<v Speaker 4>list or a blacklist, but you love and Tencent was

0:38:28.280 --> 0:38:30.640
<v Speaker 4>put on a blacklist. Do sometimes we throw babies out

0:38:30.640 --> 0:38:33.719
<v Speaker 4>with bathwater when we're looking at what is really a

0:38:33.840 --> 0:38:36.720
<v Speaker 4>Chinese military challenge to the United States.

0:38:36.880 --> 0:38:39.560
<v Speaker 15>There are certainly companies that have dual use technologies and

0:38:39.560 --> 0:38:43.560
<v Speaker 15>that have very broad array of different discipline. So, for instance, Alibaba,

0:38:43.719 --> 0:38:45.600
<v Speaker 15>well it's known as an e commerce player, also has

0:38:45.640 --> 0:38:47.600
<v Speaker 15>their own cloud business that bumps up against the likes

0:38:47.640 --> 0:38:51.000
<v Speaker 15>of Amazon, Tencent has cloud, some of them have geospatial

0:38:51.040 --> 0:38:53.040
<v Speaker 15>and other kind of forms of engineering, and so this

0:38:53.160 --> 0:38:55.360
<v Speaker 15>is a constantly evolving process. And that's exactly why we

0:38:55.360 --> 0:38:57.719
<v Speaker 15>think you need an active management because you can't sit

0:38:57.760 --> 0:38:59.640
<v Speaker 15>on an index and just trade these equities. So we've

0:38:59.640 --> 0:39:00.880
<v Speaker 15>got to be able to move in and out of

0:39:00.920 --> 0:39:04.320
<v Speaker 15>them as we think see things coming out of DoD Congress,

0:39:04.400 --> 0:39:04.840
<v Speaker 15>et cetera.

0:39:05.160 --> 0:39:08.480
<v Speaker 4>Natest you might have been exposed if Dominimus was something

0:39:08.520 --> 0:39:11.040
<v Speaker 4>you'd been depending on for some of these e commerce

0:39:11.080 --> 0:39:14.600
<v Speaker 4>players in China. Are we likely to see barriers put

0:39:14.680 --> 0:39:18.080
<v Speaker 4>up to Chinese trade ever more? But even just me

0:39:18.120 --> 0:39:20.239
<v Speaker 4>as a consumer trying to access cheaper goods.

0:39:20.040 --> 0:39:22.360
<v Speaker 15>Well, I think the dominimous kind of tax loophole was

0:39:22.360 --> 0:39:25.600
<v Speaker 15>something that needed to be closed. She and obviously tim

0:39:25.640 --> 0:39:28.040
<v Speaker 15>Wu and others are really putting a lot of American

0:39:28.040 --> 0:39:29.960
<v Speaker 15>companies out of business or eating their market share, be

0:39:30.000 --> 0:39:31.000
<v Speaker 15>it Amazon.

0:39:30.920 --> 0:39:33.279
<v Speaker 9>Or the likes. I think that was doing okay, right,

0:39:33.480 --> 0:39:34.160
<v Speaker 9>they're doing fine.

0:39:34.160 --> 0:39:36.040
<v Speaker 15>But even some of these smaller offline stores I think

0:39:36.040 --> 0:39:37.680
<v Speaker 15>are having some of that market share now eaten by

0:39:37.680 --> 0:39:39.880
<v Speaker 15>the likes of Timu, and they're building their own fulfilled

0:39:39.880 --> 0:39:42.560
<v Speaker 15>by Amazon models. So definitely we want to favor or

0:39:42.600 --> 0:39:44.719
<v Speaker 15>have a level playing field, and so that you know,

0:39:44.760 --> 0:39:47.560
<v Speaker 15>this affects Amazon as well. I think a lot of

0:39:47.400 --> 0:39:50.000
<v Speaker 15>the impact of that that was already baked in the

0:39:50.120 --> 0:39:53.240
<v Speaker 15>actual numbers coming out of tim WU aren't necessarily included

0:39:53.280 --> 0:39:55.960
<v Speaker 15>in PDDs kind of projections, I think, And so our

0:39:56.000 --> 0:39:57.879
<v Speaker 15>view is that PDD is still a strong name even

0:39:57.920 --> 0:40:00.640
<v Speaker 15>in spite of these these new Dominimus regulations.

0:40:01.760 --> 0:40:05.239
<v Speaker 2>That's Ben Harberg of Core Values Alpha. Thanks for joining us.

0:40:06.520 --> 0:40:09.480
<v Speaker 2>Looking ahead to after the closing bell today, Amazon is

0:40:09.520 --> 0:40:12.120
<v Speaker 2>slated to report its earnings and is expected to report

0:40:12.120 --> 0:40:15.560
<v Speaker 2>that revenue grow ten percent in the fourth quarter. Bloomberg's

0:40:15.600 --> 0:40:17.080
<v Speaker 2>Ryan Westellica joins us.

0:40:17.120 --> 0:40:18.880
<v Speaker 3>Now for more, Ryan.

0:40:18.800 --> 0:40:22.960
<v Speaker 2>Aws is the cloud computing titan. What are investors expecting

0:40:23.000 --> 0:40:24.120
<v Speaker 2>to see from that unit today?

0:40:25.320 --> 0:40:26.360
<v Speaker 9>Hey, thanks for having me.

0:40:26.520 --> 0:40:28.719
<v Speaker 16>I think people are expecting a pretty strong quarter, but

0:40:28.760 --> 0:40:30.919
<v Speaker 16>it does come in the wake of disappointments from both

0:40:30.960 --> 0:40:33.960
<v Speaker 16>Microsoft and Alphabet, which are number two and three in

0:40:34.040 --> 0:40:36.359
<v Speaker 16>the sector. So sorting a little bit of a more

0:40:36.400 --> 0:40:39.279
<v Speaker 16>cautious uh, you know, you know lead up going into

0:40:39.280 --> 0:40:39.960
<v Speaker 16>these results.

0:40:40.600 --> 0:40:43.239
<v Speaker 4>It's interesting that that likely to have committed more than

0:40:43.280 --> 0:40:45.800
<v Speaker 4>seventy billion in CAPEX for this year and even more

0:40:46.160 --> 0:40:46.719
<v Speaker 4>going forward.

0:40:46.719 --> 0:40:47.560
<v Speaker 3>To be comfortable with the.

0:40:47.520 --> 0:40:49.200
<v Speaker 4>Amount of spending on AI build out.

0:40:50.360 --> 0:40:52.520
<v Speaker 16>Well, we've seen so many other companies come out and

0:40:52.560 --> 0:40:55.359
<v Speaker 16>really lift their targets. Alphabet earlier in the week, Meta

0:40:55.440 --> 0:40:58.080
<v Speaker 16>not too long ago, Microsoft, These are all the major

0:40:58.160 --> 0:41:01.320
<v Speaker 16>cloud hyperscalers, and it wouldn't be surprising to see Amazon

0:41:01.360 --> 0:41:03.719
<v Speaker 16>do a similar kind of boost. Although you know, some

0:41:03.760 --> 0:41:06.040
<v Speaker 16>of these were like, you know, fifty percent more than

0:41:06.040 --> 0:41:07.880
<v Speaker 16>people were expecting. Whether we see something like that I

0:41:07.880 --> 0:41:09.840
<v Speaker 16>think would be pretty shocking, but it wouldn't be surprising

0:41:09.840 --> 0:41:11.960
<v Speaker 16>to see them bring up their caffects at least somewhat.

0:41:12.200 --> 0:41:14.719
<v Speaker 4>We were just talking to Ben Harberg about Deminimus and

0:41:14.760 --> 0:41:17.360
<v Speaker 4>the impact on Chinese competition for Amazon from an e

0:41:17.360 --> 0:41:20.120
<v Speaker 4>commerce perspective. Briefly, Ryan, what we hear about how it

0:41:20.160 --> 0:41:22.680
<v Speaker 4>will impact the business, the duties on Chinese rivals.

0:41:23.960 --> 0:41:25.400
<v Speaker 9>I'm very curious to see that.

0:41:25.480 --> 0:41:27.319
<v Speaker 16>So far, we haven't seen too much reaction in the

0:41:27.360 --> 0:41:29.440
<v Speaker 16>stock to the idea of you know, a trade war

0:41:29.520 --> 0:41:31.680
<v Speaker 16>or tariffs against China or something like that, but certainly

0:41:31.680 --> 0:41:34.440
<v Speaker 16>to the extent that we see less competition from these

0:41:34.480 --> 0:41:37.840
<v Speaker 16>lower price rivals. That's certainly a good thing for Amazon

0:41:37.880 --> 0:41:39.839
<v Speaker 16>and its e commerce market share where it is, of course,

0:41:39.880 --> 0:41:41.680
<v Speaker 16>you know, still major player here in the States.

0:41:42.000 --> 0:41:44.400
<v Speaker 4>Bloomberg's ran place. Selka, It's great to have you on.

0:41:44.680 --> 0:41:45.480
<v Speaker 4>Thank you, thank you.

0:41:45.719 --> 0:41:45.879
<v Speaker 5>Now.

0:41:45.920 --> 0:41:48.000
<v Speaker 4>That does it for this edition of Bloomberg Technology. You

0:41:48.040 --> 0:41:50.440
<v Speaker 4>do not want to forget to check out our podcast.

0:41:50.480 --> 0:41:52.040
<v Speaker 4>You can find it on the terminal as well as

0:41:52.080 --> 0:41:55.000
<v Speaker 4>online on Apple, Spotify, and iHeart and tune into the

0:41:55.040 --> 0:41:57.040
<v Speaker 4>Earnings after the bell Amazon across the deck.

0:41:57.320 --> 0:42:02.759
<v Speaker 3>This is Bloomberg Technology, who took them