WEBVTT - How Turning Down Apple Changed Nigel Wilson's Life

0:00:14.240 --> 0:00:16.800
<v Speaker 1>I'm David Merritt and I'm Francing Laqua and this is

0:00:16.800 --> 0:00:19.240
<v Speaker 1>in the City, Bloombok's podcast, connecting you to the stories

0:00:19.280 --> 0:00:21.760
<v Speaker 1>and the voices at the heart of the City of London.

0:00:22.079 --> 0:00:24.800
<v Speaker 1>This week a conversation with Nigel Wilson, Legal and General's

0:00:24.840 --> 0:00:28.120
<v Speaker 1>Chief executive. But not for much longer. Yes. Earlier this year,

0:00:28.520 --> 0:00:32.000
<v Speaker 1>Nigel announces plans to retire after more than a decade

0:00:32.320 --> 0:00:35.199
<v Speaker 1>at the home of the financial services giant. Nigel is

0:00:35.240 --> 0:00:38.120
<v Speaker 1>one of the City of London's most recognizable figures. You

0:00:38.159 --> 0:00:40.840
<v Speaker 1>can be seen around town Night died in twenty twenty

0:00:40.880 --> 0:00:43.880
<v Speaker 1>two for services to financial services. Welcome to the podcast, Nigel,

0:00:43.920 --> 0:00:46.159
<v Speaker 1>Thank you and welcome back. In fact, in fact, you

0:00:46.159 --> 0:00:49.760
<v Speaker 1>were I think our first francy on our first podcast

0:00:49.840 --> 0:00:52.600
<v Speaker 1>about the leveling up agenda of the government. So thank

0:00:52.600 --> 0:00:55.440
<v Speaker 1>you for coming back. Glad to be here, Nigel. This

0:00:55.480 --> 0:00:58.080
<v Speaker 1>is quite a transition here for you, right you're about

0:00:58.080 --> 0:01:00.319
<v Speaker 1>to step down as chief executive. What are you most

0:01:00.320 --> 0:01:03.680
<v Speaker 1>proud of? I don't really think in that sort of

0:01:03.720 --> 0:01:06.319
<v Speaker 1>way that I'm busy sort of counting the things that

0:01:06.360 --> 0:01:08.600
<v Speaker 1>I'm most proud of and then ranking them or whatever.

0:01:08.959 --> 0:01:11.320
<v Speaker 1>My biggest achievement that a legal in general is having

0:01:11.440 --> 0:01:14.840
<v Speaker 1>you know, an amazing team and amazing culture and who

0:01:14.880 --> 0:01:17.080
<v Speaker 1>are you know, trying to do the right things for

0:01:17.080 --> 0:01:19.360
<v Speaker 1>the right reasons and have a real purpose And it's

0:01:19.480 --> 0:01:22.480
<v Speaker 1>very much a purpose led business which is delivered outstanding things,

0:01:22.600 --> 0:01:25.560
<v Speaker 1>not just here but across the world. You know, in

0:01:25.600 --> 0:01:29.240
<v Speaker 1>the last decade or so, how did you know when

0:01:29.280 --> 0:01:31.680
<v Speaker 1>the right time to step down was? How difficult is

0:01:31.720 --> 0:01:36.320
<v Speaker 1>that decision? Yeah? I think the decision wasn't that difficult

0:01:36.400 --> 0:01:39.960
<v Speaker 1>because you know, you know, you can try and get

0:01:40.000 --> 0:01:42.319
<v Speaker 1>the right time or a good time, and I think,

0:01:42.440 --> 0:01:43.679
<v Speaker 1>you know, it was kind of a good time and

0:01:43.720 --> 0:01:46.920
<v Speaker 1>a good process in that you know, the company can

0:01:46.959 --> 0:01:49.920
<v Speaker 1>start the search for a successor and I can start,

0:01:49.960 --> 0:01:52.720
<v Speaker 1>you know, talking to people what I do next, and

0:01:52.920 --> 0:01:54.800
<v Speaker 1>you know it's you know, it may take a year,

0:01:54.880 --> 0:01:57.680
<v Speaker 1>which is what we've said in the in the RNs,

0:01:57.800 --> 0:02:01.320
<v Speaker 1>so not something that's going to happen in the short term,

0:02:01.480 --> 0:02:05.040
<v Speaker 1>but it allows the board to really manage the succession

0:02:05.080 --> 0:02:07.320
<v Speaker 1>process with a lot of transparency and if I got

0:02:07.360 --> 0:02:10.640
<v Speaker 1>off to talk to people about some particular role or whatever,

0:02:10.800 --> 0:02:14.200
<v Speaker 1>it's understandable why I'm doing this, rather than sort of

0:02:14.240 --> 0:02:17.280
<v Speaker 1>some clandestine alferative operation in the in the background with

0:02:17.360 --> 0:02:20.720
<v Speaker 1>headlines in Bloomberg. Yeah, we would have got the scoop right,

0:02:22.480 --> 0:02:25.360
<v Speaker 1>you know. We're recording this the day after Nichola Sturgeon

0:02:25.400 --> 0:02:28.640
<v Speaker 1>announced her stepping down as First and Scotland and in

0:02:28.680 --> 0:02:32.440
<v Speaker 1>her speech she talked about this instinctive feeling of you know,

0:02:32.520 --> 0:02:35.400
<v Speaker 1>it's time to go in there. Not enough leaders have

0:02:35.639 --> 0:02:40.200
<v Speaker 1>that sort of self knowledge in the job. I have

0:02:40.680 --> 0:02:45.160
<v Speaker 1>believed that part of serving well would be to know

0:02:46.200 --> 0:02:50.200
<v Speaker 1>almost instinctively when the time is right to make weak

0:02:50.320 --> 0:02:53.160
<v Speaker 1>for someone else and when that takes Do you think

0:02:53.160 --> 0:02:55.880
<v Speaker 1>too many chief executives cling on too long? Well, there's

0:02:55.880 --> 0:02:58.040
<v Speaker 1>not much evidence to cling on too long, but in

0:02:58.320 --> 0:03:00.320
<v Speaker 1>one sense, in terms of a time sense, you know,

0:03:00.360 --> 0:03:02.560
<v Speaker 1>the average ten year of a chief executive is you know,

0:03:02.720 --> 0:03:06.160
<v Speaker 1>three to four years. And I do think people should

0:03:06.200 --> 0:03:08.000
<v Speaker 1>be thinking of more in the sort of eight to

0:03:08.080 --> 0:03:12.160
<v Speaker 1>ten years and going about developing in their business with

0:03:12.240 --> 0:03:14.400
<v Speaker 1>an eight to ten year horizon as opposed to trying

0:03:14.400 --> 0:03:17.200
<v Speaker 1>to get immediate impact. And there's a lot of short

0:03:17.280 --> 0:03:20.320
<v Speaker 1>termism still in business and indeed in the wider economy

0:03:20.480 --> 0:03:22.400
<v Speaker 1>here in the UK, which I think has not been

0:03:22.919 --> 0:03:28.040
<v Speaker 1>helpful for economic growth or creating value for shareholders. Dave

0:03:28.080 --> 0:03:30.400
<v Speaker 1>was doing Bloomberg speak. I just thought that Nichol student

0:03:30.639 --> 0:03:33.160
<v Speaker 1>had had enough. I don't know whether there's a point that,

0:03:33.600 --> 0:03:35.800
<v Speaker 1>you know, do you step down when you've had enough

0:03:35.960 --> 0:03:38.720
<v Speaker 1>or two years before you have enough? Is there is

0:03:38.760 --> 0:03:41.840
<v Speaker 1>there an optimal point? But I think I've gone for good,

0:03:42.040 --> 0:03:43.960
<v Speaker 1>you know, which is a good point. I mean, it's

0:03:43.960 --> 0:03:45.800
<v Speaker 1>a good point for the firm to be looking for

0:03:45.840 --> 0:03:47.560
<v Speaker 1>somebody else, and it's a good point for me to

0:03:47.600 --> 0:03:49.960
<v Speaker 1>be thinking about what's my next challenge? You know. It

0:03:50.120 --> 0:03:54.320
<v Speaker 1>wasn't trying to optimize anything, you know. I mean, in

0:03:54.320 --> 0:03:56.240
<v Speaker 1>one sense, I could have gone on for a number

0:03:56.240 --> 0:03:58.360
<v Speaker 1>of years, you know. It was there's no shareholder pressure

0:03:58.480 --> 0:04:00.760
<v Speaker 1>or do you feel a change in yourself? I don't

0:04:00.760 --> 0:04:03.480
<v Speaker 1>know whether not at all? I mean, you know, I

0:04:03.480 --> 0:04:05.800
<v Speaker 1>mean the hardest thing was actually talking to all of

0:04:05.800 --> 0:04:08.800
<v Speaker 1>my colleagues amount that I was going because I've been

0:04:08.120 --> 0:04:11.160
<v Speaker 1>an important part of their life and they've been important

0:04:11.160 --> 0:04:12.760
<v Speaker 1>part of my life for a long time. So there

0:04:12.760 --> 0:04:15.640
<v Speaker 1>were some quite emotional discussions of wearing me out actually,

0:04:16.160 --> 0:04:18.200
<v Speaker 1>and I think gosh lists come to an end and

0:04:18.600 --> 0:04:20.200
<v Speaker 1>let's get the R and S out and so I

0:04:20.279 --> 0:04:22.160
<v Speaker 1>can move on the next years of my life. I

0:04:22.200 --> 0:04:24.200
<v Speaker 1>can't have another one of these meetings, which is so

0:04:24.880 --> 0:04:27.400
<v Speaker 1>emotional because we've done well as a as a team

0:04:27.520 --> 0:04:29.640
<v Speaker 1>for a long period of time and you know, people's

0:04:29.960 --> 0:04:34.119
<v Speaker 1>careers have developed and evolved and not responsibility and accountability.

0:04:34.520 --> 0:04:36.520
<v Speaker 1>It's a big part of being a leader thinking about

0:04:36.520 --> 0:04:38.919
<v Speaker 1>succession then and how much did you time did you

0:04:38.960 --> 0:04:41.880
<v Speaker 1>dedicate to try and trying to groom the people who

0:04:41.880 --> 0:04:43.520
<v Speaker 1>would be ready to take a lot a lot of

0:04:43.520 --> 0:04:45.279
<v Speaker 1>time and so I've mentioned before I moved people around

0:04:45.360 --> 0:04:48.680
<v Speaker 1>a lot. So they've got a wide range of experiences,

0:04:48.680 --> 0:04:51.719
<v Speaker 1>not just in the UK, but they've shared American divisions,

0:04:51.720 --> 0:04:54.720
<v Speaker 1>et cetera. From an internal point of point of view,

0:04:55.080 --> 0:04:57.200
<v Speaker 1>but the board has to look excernentally as well. This

0:04:57.320 --> 0:04:59.760
<v Speaker 1>is a great job for somebody to get. You know,

0:04:59.800 --> 0:05:02.080
<v Speaker 1>we we're doing incredibly well. You know the boundary it's

0:05:02.160 --> 0:05:05.960
<v Speaker 1>very strong, and the sorts of capital to spend. But actually,

0:05:06.440 --> 0:05:08.800
<v Speaker 1>you know, people internally and we've got you know, strong

0:05:08.839 --> 0:05:11.520
<v Speaker 1>internal candidates have done you know, lots of things that

0:05:11.560 --> 0:05:15.000
<v Speaker 1>have made them you know, um, let them have a

0:05:15.000 --> 0:05:17.720
<v Speaker 1>better chance. Plus we've given them specific mentoring throughout the

0:05:17.800 --> 0:05:21.760
<v Speaker 1>last year. So actually it's not like we thought about it,

0:05:21.880 --> 0:05:24.440
<v Speaker 1>you know, three months ago. We've been thinking about it

0:05:24.520 --> 0:05:27.400
<v Speaker 1>for for a while. But again, we wanted the internal

0:05:27.400 --> 0:05:30.119
<v Speaker 1>transition to work, to work well so that people felt

0:05:30.520 --> 0:05:33.279
<v Speaker 1>as though we've given them coaching and support when we

0:05:33.360 --> 0:05:36.120
<v Speaker 1>fired the gun. Well, when did you start thinking about succession?

0:05:36.200 --> 0:05:38.240
<v Speaker 1>That this must be one of the hardest things to

0:05:38.279 --> 0:05:40.640
<v Speaker 1>think about. Even when you started his chief executive. You

0:05:40.920 --> 0:05:43.000
<v Speaker 1>had to make sure that the entity or the company

0:05:43.000 --> 0:05:47.480
<v Speaker 1>is strong. Yeah you yes, yeah, and that's been developing

0:05:47.520 --> 0:05:50.600
<v Speaker 1>internal people and also bringing in some you know, great

0:05:50.680 --> 0:05:55.159
<v Speaker 1>external people into the organization. So was that deliberate, Yes, yeah, yeah,

0:05:55.160 --> 0:05:58.920
<v Speaker 1>most things I do with deliberate, they're not. I don't

0:05:58.920 --> 0:06:04.160
<v Speaker 1>over think things. Do you think things? Do you think

0:06:04.200 --> 0:06:08.320
<v Speaker 1>there's enough talent out there in Britain to do the

0:06:08.360 --> 0:06:09.960
<v Speaker 1>sort of jobs that you've just done running these foot

0:06:09.960 --> 0:06:12.640
<v Speaker 1>three hundred companies? You say there's there's a search externally.

0:06:13.320 --> 0:06:18.400
<v Speaker 1>Do we have enough stars to platform to do these

0:06:18.480 --> 0:06:21.840
<v Speaker 1>sorts of jobs? I think we answer that we're not

0:06:21.960 --> 0:06:24.720
<v Speaker 1>developed enough talent at a bought a macro level, at

0:06:24.720 --> 0:06:30.479
<v Speaker 1>a micro level across the across the UK. And I

0:06:30.520 --> 0:06:33.760
<v Speaker 1>think that's something that you know, everyone should be thinking about,

0:06:33.920 --> 0:06:37.240
<v Speaker 1>is you know, how do we develop more talent in

0:06:37.279 --> 0:06:39.080
<v Speaker 1>the UK so that people can step up and do

0:06:39.160 --> 0:06:40.880
<v Speaker 1>bigger jobs. Is that you know, we've got some of

0:06:40.920 --> 0:06:43.280
<v Speaker 1>the best universes in the world. People come here to

0:06:43.320 --> 0:06:45.920
<v Speaker 1>have their education, but why are we not developing enough

0:06:45.920 --> 0:06:48.120
<v Speaker 1>to step up to run these big comforcause, I was

0:06:48.120 --> 0:06:50.480
<v Speaker 1>doing a topping out ceremony at Oxford yesterday, which is

0:06:50.880 --> 0:06:55.279
<v Speaker 1>one of our big projects, four billion pound project, and

0:06:55.440 --> 0:06:57.560
<v Speaker 1>we were talking about the same thing as we produced

0:06:57.560 --> 0:07:01.640
<v Speaker 1>this incredible amount of people out of our brilliant universities,

0:07:01.680 --> 0:07:05.040
<v Speaker 1>including Oxford. You know, but how many of them rise

0:07:05.160 --> 0:07:09.560
<v Speaker 1>to you know, really important jobs in business? And have

0:07:09.720 --> 0:07:13.360
<v Speaker 1>we really solved business well enough into university graduates? And

0:07:13.560 --> 0:07:16.880
<v Speaker 1>you know, once they graduate, is that something that they

0:07:17.880 --> 0:07:20.120
<v Speaker 1>look upon as a as a realistic goal that they

0:07:20.160 --> 0:07:22.720
<v Speaker 1>could become, you know, a chief executive of a futsye

0:07:22.800 --> 0:07:25.360
<v Speaker 1>hundred company. But what makes a difference between someone that

0:07:25.400 --> 0:07:28.120
<v Speaker 1>becomes a chief executive and doesn't So is it aspiration

0:07:28.160 --> 0:07:30.960
<v Speaker 1>to become chief executive or is it resilience? I've heard,

0:07:31.000 --> 0:07:33.720
<v Speaker 1>you know, you hear that you can have two people,

0:07:34.160 --> 0:07:39.600
<v Speaker 1>same qualifications, same smarts, same intellect, but it's resilience through

0:07:39.600 --> 0:07:41.800
<v Speaker 1>the tough times that will make one succeed, not the other.

0:07:41.920 --> 0:07:44.320
<v Speaker 1>But that's when you learn as well, you know, success

0:07:44.360 --> 0:07:47.040
<v Speaker 1>as a poor teacher, whereas when things go wrong you

0:07:47.160 --> 0:07:49.320
<v Speaker 1>have to accept they've gone wrong and then really study

0:07:49.360 --> 0:07:53.000
<v Speaker 1>and learn what happened why. And resilience is the most

0:07:53.080 --> 0:07:57.920
<v Speaker 1>underrated you know attribute to people don't really recognize in

0:07:58.040 --> 0:08:00.560
<v Speaker 1>others and they don't teach it very well, although coach

0:08:00.640 --> 0:08:04.800
<v Speaker 1>it very well or make people very self aware. Compartmentalization

0:08:04.920 --> 0:08:07.240
<v Speaker 1>is a really important part of that process because you

0:08:07.240 --> 0:08:10.640
<v Speaker 1>can chop your life into different bits and then you

0:08:10.680 --> 0:08:13.880
<v Speaker 1>know not all things will go well all of the time,

0:08:13.960 --> 0:08:16.240
<v Speaker 1>but you're not sort of cross contaminating other parts of

0:08:16.280 --> 0:08:19.080
<v Speaker 1>your life because one part isn't going so well, and

0:08:19.520 --> 0:08:21.560
<v Speaker 1>you know, nobody's life all the parts of their life

0:08:21.640 --> 0:08:23.160
<v Speaker 1>is going to go well at the same time, so

0:08:23.160 --> 0:08:25.400
<v Speaker 1>you've got to have this sort of cross resilience. You know,

0:08:25.480 --> 0:08:28.280
<v Speaker 1>you're only as happy as your least happy child. Actually

0:08:28.280 --> 0:08:32.079
<v Speaker 1>this I love that basically, but that's true, and so

0:08:33.320 --> 0:08:36.000
<v Speaker 1>you know, but if you worry endlessly about your least

0:08:36.000 --> 0:08:38.480
<v Speaker 1>happy child whilst you're at work, then you know you've

0:08:38.480 --> 0:08:41.800
<v Speaker 1>become unproductive. But you know when you get home you

0:08:42.000 --> 0:08:43.719
<v Speaker 1>really have to worry about at least happy child and

0:08:43.800 --> 0:08:45.840
<v Speaker 1>make sure they're get a bit happier so everybody else

0:08:45.960 --> 0:08:48.480
<v Speaker 1>is happy. Think thinking a little bit about what you

0:08:48.640 --> 0:08:51.480
<v Speaker 1>was talking about the skills gap in Britain again and

0:08:51.840 --> 0:08:55.360
<v Speaker 1>just remembering our conversation last year around leveling up and

0:08:55.360 --> 0:08:58.480
<v Speaker 1>you're very passionate about that subject. It's part of the problem.

0:08:58.520 --> 0:08:59.880
<v Speaker 1>You were just at Oxford. I mean, we have this

0:09:00.160 --> 0:09:03.720
<v Speaker 1>concentration of excellence in this kind of triangle of Oxford,

0:09:03.720 --> 0:09:06.360
<v Speaker 1>Cambridge and London. We haven't done enough, have we to

0:09:06.400 --> 0:09:09.559
<v Speaker 1>spread the skills or the centers of excellence all around

0:09:09.559 --> 0:09:11.720
<v Speaker 1>Preson No, I think that's true. I mean, you know,

0:09:12.080 --> 0:09:15.360
<v Speaker 1>in big picture terms were of law growth, law productivity,

0:09:15.440 --> 0:09:19.160
<v Speaker 1>low wage economy fought by political infighting and so you

0:09:19.200 --> 0:09:22.440
<v Speaker 1>know the political genders is massive over here where you know,

0:09:22.640 --> 0:09:25.600
<v Speaker 1>relentlessly on the news it's nearly always negative. It's very

0:09:25.640 --> 0:09:28.839
<v Speaker 1>London centric and you know people don't get out enough

0:09:28.920 --> 0:09:31.200
<v Speaker 1>to to look you know, what's the real potential of

0:09:31.320 --> 0:09:35.560
<v Speaker 1>Edinburgh or Newcastle, law Manchester or Birmingham, and they've fallen behind.

0:09:35.960 --> 0:09:37.839
<v Speaker 1>You've always Nigel given us a lot of time talking

0:09:37.880 --> 0:09:40.360
<v Speaker 1>about leveling up and things that are very dear and

0:09:40.360 --> 0:09:42.360
<v Speaker 1>it's very clear when we hear you speak that are

0:09:42.480 --> 0:09:44.920
<v Speaker 1>very Jersey heart. Would you go into politics? Do think

0:09:45.320 --> 0:09:48.400
<v Speaker 1>it's interesting what is politics? If politics is having a

0:09:49.679 --> 0:09:52.880
<v Speaker 1>you know, functional role in government, then that's not, as

0:09:52.920 --> 0:09:56.640
<v Speaker 1>you know, particularly appealing. But if politics is defined as

0:09:56.840 --> 0:10:00.480
<v Speaker 1>delivering you know, economically and socially useful outcomes a large

0:10:00.480 --> 0:10:02.760
<v Speaker 1>part of the population, then you know, I'm clearly in

0:10:02.800 --> 0:10:05.280
<v Speaker 1>the latter camp and not in the former camp. You know,

0:10:05.760 --> 0:10:07.840
<v Speaker 1>do I want to be you know, the Minister of

0:10:07.880 --> 0:10:12.520
<v Speaker 1>Trade or defense or education city and then the city minister? No? I,

0:10:12.920 --> 0:10:15.240
<v Speaker 1>you know, I don't particularly want to do that, But

0:10:15.480 --> 0:10:17.080
<v Speaker 1>you know, do I want to be a champion for

0:10:17.160 --> 0:10:20.920
<v Speaker 1>leveling up across the UK and various components of that. Absolutely?

0:10:21.520 --> 0:10:23.200
<v Speaker 1>You know. Do I want to write about that in

0:10:23.240 --> 0:10:26.560
<v Speaker 1>a more academic way going forward, Absolutely, given all of

0:10:26.600 --> 0:10:29.280
<v Speaker 1>the knowledge that I have, an experience that I have

0:10:29.480 --> 0:10:33.360
<v Speaker 1>around that that's sort of unfinished business from my previous

0:10:33.440 --> 0:10:37.640
<v Speaker 1>academic career, which I dropped many years ago to pursuers

0:10:37.640 --> 0:10:39.160
<v Speaker 1>and this is where you're going to pursue your energies.

0:10:39.360 --> 0:10:42.599
<v Speaker 1>It's so academia, but with a kind of public policy agenda.

0:10:42.720 --> 0:10:44.840
<v Speaker 1>That's part of what I want to do going forward.

0:10:44.960 --> 0:10:48.360
<v Speaker 1>You know, I definitely want to have a direct impact on,

0:10:48.679 --> 0:10:50.640
<v Speaker 1>you know, the lives of people. You know, I want

0:10:50.640 --> 0:10:52.880
<v Speaker 1>to finish off while I started, which is teaching. You know,

0:10:52.960 --> 0:10:56.079
<v Speaker 1>I love teaching at m I T and previously in

0:10:56.280 --> 0:10:58.400
<v Speaker 1>Essex when I was in the UK. But I now

0:10:58.480 --> 0:11:00.880
<v Speaker 1>have a lot more life experience, a lot more relevance

0:11:00.920 --> 0:11:03.640
<v Speaker 1>I think for the students and can be more ambitious

0:11:03.640 --> 0:11:06.080
<v Speaker 1>at aspirational for them, saying you know, this is how

0:11:06.080 --> 0:11:09.000
<v Speaker 1>you get to these jobs. Do you think chief executives,

0:11:09.440 --> 0:11:13.560
<v Speaker 1>you know foot see listed companies think enough about giving back,

0:11:13.600 --> 0:11:16.319
<v Speaker 1>about leveling up, about making a real difference. I think

0:11:16.320 --> 0:11:18.280
<v Speaker 1>I'd like everybody to think a bit more about it.

0:11:18.360 --> 0:11:21.240
<v Speaker 1>I think there's, you know, the theoretical framework that you

0:11:21.280 --> 0:11:24.600
<v Speaker 1>know Michael and Andy developed with with some help, but

0:11:24.960 --> 0:11:27.240
<v Speaker 1>it is just a theoretical framework. You know, what matters

0:11:27.320 --> 0:11:31.040
<v Speaker 1>is the outcomes, and you measure stuff buy outcomes, and

0:11:31.160 --> 0:11:34.600
<v Speaker 1>you know we haven't delivered enough good, economically sourced, useful

0:11:34.600 --> 0:11:37.959
<v Speaker 1>outcomes across across Why do people not think about it more?

0:11:38.320 --> 0:11:40.000
<v Speaker 1>I don't know what I mean I know what I do.

0:11:40.440 --> 0:11:42.320
<v Speaker 1>It's always you know, how do why do other people not?

0:11:43.800 --> 0:11:46.000
<v Speaker 1>Part of the reason I have sort of long term

0:11:46.160 --> 0:11:48.840
<v Speaker 1>views about stuff, and you know, even when i'm you know,

0:11:48.960 --> 0:11:51.160
<v Speaker 1>and I want to change things over a period of time,

0:11:51.720 --> 0:11:54.080
<v Speaker 1>most people are working on a quartity and thinking on

0:11:54.120 --> 0:11:56.400
<v Speaker 1>a quartity basis. Or look, how numbers are terrible, inquar

0:11:56.520 --> 0:11:58.280
<v Speaker 1>what can we do next quarter to get them back up?

0:11:58.360 --> 0:12:00.360
<v Speaker 1>Or whatever. It's your point about the you know, terms

0:12:00.400 --> 0:12:03.040
<v Speaker 1>of CEO. If you've got three years in that job,

0:12:03.559 --> 0:12:06.040
<v Speaker 1>you've got to do. You've got to deliver shareholder returns.

0:12:06.040 --> 0:12:07.800
<v Speaker 1>You're not going to think about the next decade, or yeah,

0:12:07.840 --> 0:12:09.600
<v Speaker 1>we have to think about the next decade. That's the

0:12:09.640 --> 0:12:13.480
<v Speaker 1>thing that the mindset changed with SIME. For politics, you know,

0:12:14.160 --> 0:12:17.560
<v Speaker 1>I do people players politics where has actually been a

0:12:17.600 --> 0:12:20.360
<v Speaker 1>politicians start with the other way around, the other way around,

0:12:20.600 --> 0:12:23.000
<v Speaker 1>which is wrong. And I think in business, you know,

0:12:23.200 --> 0:12:28.600
<v Speaker 1>short term profits become too important to focus whereas you know,

0:12:28.720 --> 0:12:30.320
<v Speaker 1>you want to say, you know, I've got a ten

0:12:30.400 --> 0:12:31.920
<v Speaker 1>year of you and this is where I want to

0:12:32.120 --> 0:12:35.200
<v Speaker 1>reposition the business over time, and I think that is

0:12:35.200 --> 0:12:38.439
<v Speaker 1>a will result in more success and actually saying don't

0:12:38.440 --> 0:12:41.080
<v Speaker 1>worry I'll get this sorted out in the next six months,

0:12:41.120 --> 0:12:44.800
<v Speaker 1>on amends twelve months. And you want to bring in talent,

0:12:44.840 --> 0:12:47.000
<v Speaker 1>you want to develop talent. That just takes a long time.

0:12:47.200 --> 0:12:49.160
<v Speaker 1>One of the things that the chief executive might say

0:12:49.160 --> 0:12:51.240
<v Speaker 1>as well, I've got to deliver these returns. I've got

0:12:51.240 --> 0:12:53.480
<v Speaker 1>these these shareholds. Of course, you're around a company which

0:12:53.480 --> 0:12:56.760
<v Speaker 1>is a massive shareholder and an investor in corporate Britain. Yeah,

0:12:57.040 --> 0:12:59.240
<v Speaker 1>it does something need to shift in the way that

0:13:00.240 --> 0:13:04.360
<v Speaker 1>fifty hundred companies are owned and the relationship shareholders understand

0:13:04.360 --> 0:13:07.000
<v Speaker 1>that ironically that actually it ticks ticks a long time.

0:13:07.160 --> 0:13:10.440
<v Speaker 1>It's the it's the marginal shareholder, if you're lying, who

0:13:10.520 --> 0:13:13.080
<v Speaker 1>makes the most noise because they're based so much of

0:13:13.120 --> 0:13:15.960
<v Speaker 1>their job is based on their quarterly performance, and they

0:13:16.120 --> 0:13:19.560
<v Speaker 1>lose assets very quickly, and those are the marginal assets.

0:13:19.640 --> 0:13:22.720
<v Speaker 1>But the biggest shareholders are looking for long term returns

0:13:22.720 --> 0:13:25.680
<v Speaker 1>because we have sticky customers and we're enormous now we're

0:13:25.679 --> 0:13:30.760
<v Speaker 1>all huge companies, and but we want long term returns

0:13:30.800 --> 0:13:34.000
<v Speaker 1>over a decade, not short term returns over a quarter.

0:13:34.880 --> 0:13:39.360
<v Speaker 1>On paper, we've got a very business sort of centered government. Now,

0:13:39.440 --> 0:13:42.520
<v Speaker 1>obviously we've been through this amazing that this week gold Yeah,

0:13:42.559 --> 0:13:46.160
<v Speaker 1>exactly this week plaically. But you know, the term oil

0:13:46.200 --> 0:13:50.439
<v Speaker 1>of last summer was obviously remarkable and noted all around

0:13:50.440 --> 0:13:53.800
<v Speaker 1>the world. But we've got a prime Minister who worked

0:13:53.800 --> 0:13:58.120
<v Speaker 1>at Golden Sacks, worked in California. It's talked about the

0:13:58.200 --> 0:14:00.679
<v Speaker 1>sort of startup Briton that he wants to create, and

0:14:00.679 --> 0:14:03.240
<v Speaker 1>we've got a Chancellor who's also a businessman. Do you

0:14:03.320 --> 0:14:06.560
<v Speaker 1>think that's the right team to push through some of

0:14:06.559 --> 0:14:09.400
<v Speaker 1>these big structural changes in this economy that you're talking about.

0:14:09.440 --> 0:14:10.720
<v Speaker 1>I think I think they're a good team. I think

0:14:10.760 --> 0:14:13.120
<v Speaker 1>we're looking at them. Both political leaders are the good

0:14:13.160 --> 0:14:17.480
<v Speaker 1>people and of course apicially and Kia very good people

0:14:17.480 --> 0:14:20.400
<v Speaker 1>and want to deliver you know, good outcomes across the

0:14:20.520 --> 0:14:22.960
<v Speaker 1>UK and recognize that will take here. As you know,

0:14:23.400 --> 0:14:25.920
<v Speaker 1>he hasn't got long is the problem in he's like

0:14:25.960 --> 0:14:28.480
<v Speaker 1>a two year chief executive, right and maybe even less

0:14:28.480 --> 0:14:30.520
<v Speaker 1>maybe Les, Yeah, I mean that's the whole problem is

0:14:30.560 --> 0:14:33.600
<v Speaker 1>that people are thinking, you know, and you can't change

0:14:33.600 --> 0:14:36.040
<v Speaker 1>things quick enough in Britain because the planning and the

0:14:36.120 --> 0:14:40.120
<v Speaker 1>policy changes just take too long and therefore you end

0:14:40.200 --> 0:14:43.040
<v Speaker 1>up doing you know, odd things. You know, we very

0:14:43.120 --> 0:14:46.200
<v Speaker 1>rarely do strategic taxes. We always do stealth taxes. You know,

0:14:46.160 --> 0:14:48.160
<v Speaker 1>if there's a shortage, we never think about, you know,

0:14:48.200 --> 0:14:50.680
<v Speaker 1>what's the right thing to do over a ten year horizon.

0:14:50.800 --> 0:14:53.280
<v Speaker 1>It's what we need to do very quickly to get

0:14:53.320 --> 0:14:56.760
<v Speaker 1>some money money in. You know, the planning systems, you

0:14:56.800 --> 0:14:59.840
<v Speaker 1>know desperately need to reform in the UK. The whole

0:15:00.000 --> 0:15:03.120
<v Speaker 1>of the pensions industry needs reform in the UK. But

0:15:03.160 --> 0:15:07.240
<v Speaker 1>these are multi year projects. And you know, whether you

0:15:07.440 --> 0:15:09.960
<v Speaker 1>get people like myself to work on those multi year

0:15:10.040 --> 0:15:13.520
<v Speaker 1>projects and help get them passed without having to the

0:15:13.600 --> 0:15:18.240
<v Speaker 1>timetable of a political party to support them is is

0:15:18.240 --> 0:15:21.120
<v Speaker 1>a very interesting question. I think, going going forward, what

0:15:21.120 --> 0:15:28.600
<v Speaker 1>would labor do. I don't know what l E talks with. No, No,

0:15:28.680 --> 0:15:30.720
<v Speaker 1>I like them as well. I think they're good people

0:15:30.760 --> 0:15:33.240
<v Speaker 1>trying to do a good job. So we're fortunate and

0:15:33.360 --> 0:15:36.280
<v Speaker 1>we've got you know, people who are quite similar in

0:15:36.280 --> 0:15:39.080
<v Speaker 1>many ways about what they want to see as the outcome,

0:15:39.640 --> 0:15:42.120
<v Speaker 1>and it's the outcome that matters and their pro business

0:15:42.280 --> 0:15:44.640
<v Speaker 1>and their pro business which is good. And I think

0:15:44.640 --> 0:15:47.960
<v Speaker 1>they are pro business, which is good because you know,

0:15:48.240 --> 0:15:51.760
<v Speaker 1>business is the Whether these policies have to be delivered,

0:15:51.960 --> 0:15:54.720
<v Speaker 1>and you know it's the delivery part of stuff that

0:15:55.120 --> 0:15:58.400
<v Speaker 1>has been lacking in so many areas across the UK

0:15:59.040 --> 0:16:02.320
<v Speaker 1>such a long period of time. You know, we you know,

0:16:02.480 --> 0:16:05.880
<v Speaker 1>DC pensions desperately need reforming in Britain so that they're

0:16:05.880 --> 0:16:09.040
<v Speaker 1>competitive with you know, the four or one case in America,

0:16:09.080 --> 0:16:11.640
<v Speaker 1>but also the Swiss system, the Australian system, the French system,

0:16:11.760 --> 0:16:15.560
<v Speaker 1>all of whom have modernized pension system because we've not

0:16:15.640 --> 0:16:18.600
<v Speaker 1>had you know, anybody in government for assicient long, soficiently

0:16:18.640 --> 0:16:21.920
<v Speaker 1>long to drive through read real change. So we need

0:16:22.120 --> 0:16:26.160
<v Speaker 1>long termism that people have collectively bought into and to

0:16:26.240 --> 0:16:28.320
<v Speaker 1>really make a difference. So if you had a seven

0:16:28.400 --> 0:16:33.200
<v Speaker 1>year tenure as prime minister, you've mentioned planning pensions, what

0:16:33.720 --> 0:16:36.360
<v Speaker 1>would be the biggest priority beyond your intron like day one?

0:16:36.920 --> 0:16:40.080
<v Speaker 1>I think those take a tiny amount of time to

0:16:40.200 --> 0:16:43.120
<v Speaker 1>really sort them out properly by getting everybody in the

0:16:43.200 --> 0:16:46.360
<v Speaker 1>room to collaborate whatever. But I would see myself as

0:16:46.400 --> 0:16:49.120
<v Speaker 1>the advisor to the prime minister, not the prime minister.

0:16:50.200 --> 0:16:52.720
<v Speaker 1>That's too difficult a job and it's a very overly

0:16:52.800 --> 0:16:56.000
<v Speaker 1>demanding job. Whereas you know, I can be you know,

0:16:56.080 --> 0:16:59.359
<v Speaker 1>deep subject matter experts on things and actually help facilitate

0:16:59.480 --> 0:17:04.439
<v Speaker 1>change in the UK. But you know, the education system still,

0:17:04.560 --> 0:17:07.800
<v Speaker 1>you know, it's brilliant for the elite but actually under

0:17:07.880 --> 0:17:10.280
<v Speaker 1>really talented, but it's not good enough for everyone else.

0:17:10.280 --> 0:17:13.639
<v Speaker 1>And just recognizing that, you know, we need a massive

0:17:13.680 --> 0:17:17.639
<v Speaker 1>amount of investment, both from internally, from the pension funds

0:17:17.760 --> 0:17:21.119
<v Speaker 1>who've got five trillion of assets, but actually you know

0:17:21.160 --> 0:17:24.600
<v Speaker 1>foreign direct investment that stays for a long period of time.

0:17:24.720 --> 0:17:27.480
<v Speaker 1>You know, you know, our car industry is gradually eking away,

0:17:27.560 --> 0:17:32.440
<v Speaker 1>the city's gradually shrinking, and these things we need to correct.

0:17:32.760 --> 0:17:35.119
<v Speaker 1>Through the years, You've had many headlines and papers. Were

0:17:35.160 --> 0:17:38.000
<v Speaker 1>there any that you were unhappy about? It was one

0:17:38.000 --> 0:17:42.119
<v Speaker 1>in particular where we were labeled as dull but worthy.

0:17:42.359 --> 0:17:44.959
<v Speaker 1>That was the headline, dull still but worthy. So I

0:17:45.000 --> 0:17:47.240
<v Speaker 1>was really upset about what did your wife think that? Well,

0:17:47.400 --> 0:17:50.840
<v Speaker 1>well she knew that was true, but there's not there

0:17:50.920 --> 0:17:54.080
<v Speaker 1>was not my image of myself and so but actually

0:17:54.119 --> 0:17:57.520
<v Speaker 1>a few footy hundred CEOs, particularly in the financial service

0:17:57.600 --> 0:18:00.720
<v Speaker 1>called me up and said, amazing, headlight out. I would

0:18:00.760 --> 0:18:02.960
<v Speaker 1>I would love that dream of that right, dream of

0:18:03.040 --> 0:18:09.080
<v Speaker 1>that was classes, But it was the dulness bit and

0:18:09.640 --> 0:18:12.159
<v Speaker 1>which was really really I never think of myself as

0:18:12.160 --> 0:18:17.400
<v Speaker 1>a dull person, but obviously sometimes I am. I'm sure

0:18:17.400 --> 0:18:20.280
<v Speaker 1>shareholders what were very happy about that as long as

0:18:20.320 --> 0:18:24.119
<v Speaker 1>it was incrementally returned it well, they were, they were happy.

0:18:24.280 --> 0:18:26.320
<v Speaker 1>What would it take for you to accept another big

0:18:26.359 --> 0:18:28.600
<v Speaker 1>foot see one. I'm not going to do that. You know,

0:18:28.600 --> 0:18:33.240
<v Speaker 1>I've decided that not yet. You're not ever. You know

0:18:33.280 --> 0:18:36.600
<v Speaker 1>the unfinished business from earlier parts of my life that

0:18:36.359 --> 0:18:40.080
<v Speaker 1>I that I had intended to go too much earlier

0:18:40.119 --> 0:18:43.040
<v Speaker 1>in my original regional plan was, you know, do twenty

0:18:43.119 --> 0:18:45.240
<v Speaker 1>years in business, you know, go to McKinsey and all

0:18:45.280 --> 0:18:47.600
<v Speaker 1>the rest of its. Learn a lot very quickly in McKinsey. Then,

0:18:47.920 --> 0:18:49.639
<v Speaker 1>so this is teaching, you want to go back to

0:18:49.680 --> 0:18:52.880
<v Speaker 1>teaching of coarencing outcomes. I think it's really it's really

0:18:52.880 --> 0:18:53.920
<v Speaker 1>what I want to do. And I'm going to do

0:18:54.000 --> 0:18:55.800
<v Speaker 1>some more sport. You know, I love playing sports. You

0:18:55.800 --> 0:18:58.360
<v Speaker 1>know I lived university life. You know it's intellectually curious

0:18:58.359 --> 0:19:00.480
<v Speaker 1>and enjoyed sports. This is the perfect take place for

0:19:00.480 --> 0:19:04.520
<v Speaker 1>me to go. Regrets to be you just don't have

0:19:04.520 --> 0:19:07.720
<v Speaker 1>the same influence and I respect one hundred percent respect academics. Yeah,

0:19:07.920 --> 0:19:10.280
<v Speaker 1>and policy advisors. But if you're you know, the chief

0:19:10.280 --> 0:19:14.200
<v Speaker 1>executive of the biggest footsy one hundred company, you're you're

0:19:14.200 --> 0:19:16.000
<v Speaker 1>going to have more skin in the game and more influence.

0:19:16.040 --> 0:19:19.320
<v Speaker 1>We have parlticians. Yes, no, I think that's true. I

0:19:19.359 --> 0:19:22.320
<v Speaker 1>do think that's true, But but it's not that, you know,

0:19:22.560 --> 0:19:24.600
<v Speaker 1>can I do another rule where I have a huge

0:19:24.640 --> 0:19:27.960
<v Speaker 1>amount of influence? And that's the challenge I'm setting setting

0:19:28.000 --> 0:19:32.119
<v Speaker 1>myself where I'm not in some ways constrained by you know,

0:19:32.480 --> 0:19:34.840
<v Speaker 1>the legal and general position on stuff because we you know,

0:19:34.880 --> 0:19:37.399
<v Speaker 1>we own you know, every footsie hundred company and etcetera

0:19:38.600 --> 0:19:41.119
<v Speaker 1>is And that's one of my personal goals. What's the

0:19:41.200 --> 0:19:43.720
<v Speaker 1>rule that would give me huge amount of satisfaction where

0:19:43.720 --> 0:19:47.359
<v Speaker 1>I could deliver outcomes, not reports which sit on the shelf,

0:19:47.359 --> 0:19:51.320
<v Speaker 1>but actually outcomes which will result in much better solutions

0:19:51.320 --> 0:19:53.840
<v Speaker 1>for the UK and change the culture so that we

0:19:53.960 --> 0:19:56.200
<v Speaker 1>become you know, this is the vision, this is the

0:19:56.280 --> 0:19:58.040
<v Speaker 1>north start, and this is how we're going to get there.

0:19:58.040 --> 0:19:59.520
<v Speaker 1>And it's not going to be linear, it's going to

0:19:59.520 --> 0:20:02.080
<v Speaker 1>be up and but actually, you know, people have the

0:20:02.160 --> 0:20:05.080
<v Speaker 1>confidence in that you have the capability to get there,

0:20:05.160 --> 0:20:07.280
<v Speaker 1>and you build the team that believes they're going to

0:20:07.320 --> 0:20:09.720
<v Speaker 1>get there. And if you if you're going to advise

0:20:09.760 --> 0:20:13.359
<v Speaker 1>committees and advise politicians, how domestic are you that some

0:20:13.400 --> 0:20:16.440
<v Speaker 1>of these trends you mentioned the dwindling city here, dwindling

0:20:16.520 --> 0:20:19.439
<v Speaker 1>car industry, that these things really can be reversed. I

0:20:19.480 --> 0:20:21.560
<v Speaker 1>think there can be. Ellengy is a good example of

0:20:21.600 --> 0:20:23.479
<v Speaker 1>that is that you know, we would you know, not

0:20:23.520 --> 0:20:27.119
<v Speaker 1>doing well you know, in the after the after the

0:20:27.119 --> 0:20:29.960
<v Speaker 1>financial crisis, and we've done you know very well, you know,

0:20:30.080 --> 0:20:31.840
<v Speaker 1>very well across the world and you know, become a

0:20:31.880 --> 0:20:36.320
<v Speaker 1>globally trusted brand and that having that credential and the

0:20:36.320 --> 0:20:38.560
<v Speaker 1>credibility as a consequence that I think it's very very

0:20:38.560 --> 0:20:41.280
<v Speaker 1>important to me when you're talking about you know, the need,

0:20:41.359 --> 0:20:44.080
<v Speaker 1>the need for change, and you know, even yesterday in

0:20:44.119 --> 0:20:46.800
<v Speaker 1>Oxford or in two weeks ago in Sunderland and Newcastle

0:20:46.840 --> 0:20:48.520
<v Speaker 1>which is where I was. You know, we've been at

0:20:48.560 --> 0:20:52.479
<v Speaker 1>these things for ten years and people see the transformational change.

0:20:52.520 --> 0:20:54.560
<v Speaker 1>You know, there's a million square feet we built in

0:20:54.680 --> 0:20:57.600
<v Speaker 1>Cardiff for regenerating Cardiff. Now, if I'd gone to my

0:20:57.640 --> 0:20:59.480
<v Speaker 1>shareholders ten years ago and said, by the way, I'm

0:20:59.480 --> 0:21:01.639
<v Speaker 1>going to build them onion square feet in Cardiff that

0:21:01.720 --> 0:21:05.960
<v Speaker 1>have been calling the chairman straight away? What does you

0:21:06.040 --> 0:21:07.680
<v Speaker 1>mean by doing it? But it was a you get

0:21:07.720 --> 0:21:09.240
<v Speaker 1>to a doll that leads to a door. You know,

0:21:09.280 --> 0:21:12.959
<v Speaker 1>you become successful and then you you that success breed success,

0:21:12.960 --> 0:21:15.800
<v Speaker 1>You build momentum. Have you mentioned sport? I mean, you

0:21:15.840 --> 0:21:19.199
<v Speaker 1>know one era that hasn't shrunk is the football. You know,

0:21:19.240 --> 0:21:21.919
<v Speaker 1>it's a bit by far the biggest league. What can

0:21:21.960 --> 0:21:27.000
<v Speaker 1>we learn economy? Yeah? It sat out to us the

0:21:27.040 --> 0:21:31.639
<v Speaker 1>Super Bowl at half time? Boy, was there wrong a

0:21:31.640 --> 0:21:34.440
<v Speaker 1>little about American football? Would you run would you run

0:21:34.480 --> 0:21:36.920
<v Speaker 1>a Premier League? No? I'm not interested in I got

0:21:36.920 --> 0:21:39.159
<v Speaker 1>offered that many many, many years ago and decided that

0:21:39.200 --> 0:21:42.840
<v Speaker 1>actually that was just just it's it's not not a job.

0:21:42.920 --> 0:21:46.400
<v Speaker 1>I love watching football, but doesn't mean I want to,

0:21:46.480 --> 0:21:50.000
<v Speaker 1>you know, be involved in the management of a football

0:21:50.520 --> 0:21:52.120
<v Speaker 1>And I was going to ask you that the best

0:21:52.160 --> 0:21:54.040
<v Speaker 1>piece of advice you would give to your successor, but

0:21:54.040 --> 0:21:57.080
<v Speaker 1>actually gonna ask you the worst piece of advice that

0:21:57.160 --> 0:22:00.520
<v Speaker 1>you could give your successor. I think you know, building

0:22:00.560 --> 0:22:02.560
<v Speaker 1>the teams is the is the key. You know people

0:22:02.600 --> 0:22:04.480
<v Speaker 1>we always say people are the key, but you really

0:22:04.520 --> 0:22:07.240
<v Speaker 1>got to believe that people are the key. Um, and

0:22:07.840 --> 0:22:10.560
<v Speaker 1>be confident that you've got you know this, this north

0:22:10.600 --> 0:22:15.120
<v Speaker 1>star and convinced, you know, internally, externally everybody that that's

0:22:15.119 --> 0:22:17.639
<v Speaker 1>the right thing to do. And worst piece of advice.

0:22:18.680 --> 0:22:20.680
<v Speaker 1>Don't know whether I don't know. I don't know whether

0:22:20.680 --> 0:22:22.919
<v Speaker 1>I give worst advice, the worst piece of advice someone's

0:22:22.960 --> 0:22:28.000
<v Speaker 1>given you. Travel more, I don't have more coffee? Yea, yeah, yeah,

0:22:28.920 --> 0:22:32.000
<v Speaker 1>run a football club, I like, I don't remember like

0:22:32.040 --> 0:22:33.600
<v Speaker 1>bad advice, if you know what I mean. I domin

0:22:33.720 --> 0:22:39.320
<v Speaker 1>out there searching for bad advice around around stuff. Um.

0:22:39.359 --> 0:22:42.480
<v Speaker 1>I was approached about being the CFO of Apple years

0:22:42.480 --> 0:22:47.679
<v Speaker 1>ago and I turned it down. Why it's not a

0:22:47.680 --> 0:22:50.480
<v Speaker 1>bad decision because it's some everybody, my friends in the

0:22:50.560 --> 0:22:55.639
<v Speaker 1>head don't disagree that it's terrible to wait. It's a

0:22:55.640 --> 0:22:57.960
<v Speaker 1>long time ago, So don't go don't don't go there.

0:22:57.800 --> 0:23:01.479
<v Speaker 1>You're asking, you know, the exactly public. It's a long

0:23:01.600 --> 0:23:05.840
<v Speaker 1>long time ago. But I mean, do you wait, do

0:23:05.880 --> 0:23:07.520
<v Speaker 1>you have a pinch in your stomach every time you

0:23:07.520 --> 0:23:09.919
<v Speaker 1>buy an iPhone? No? No, no, no, it's not. It

0:23:10.000 --> 0:23:12.320
<v Speaker 1>was I learned a lot about that, is that. What

0:23:12.680 --> 0:23:14.399
<v Speaker 1>I what I learned was, you know, do your own

0:23:14.480 --> 0:23:17.680
<v Speaker 1>research yourself, and you know when I joined Ellen g

0:23:17.800 --> 0:23:20.360
<v Speaker 1>had done tons of research on it, saw this huge potential,

0:23:20.440 --> 0:23:23.360
<v Speaker 1>and I made my own mind up. But rather than

0:23:23.600 --> 0:23:26.440
<v Speaker 1>sort of listen to people who are supposedly experts but

0:23:26.480 --> 0:23:29.480
<v Speaker 1>actually hadn't done a deep dive on where the company

0:23:29.480 --> 0:23:32.120
<v Speaker 1>could be. Nigel, thank you so much, Thank you, thank you,

0:23:35.119 --> 0:23:37.320
<v Speaker 1>thanks for listening to this week's in the City. We'll

0:23:37.320 --> 0:23:39.320
<v Speaker 1>be back next week, but in the meantime, if you

0:23:39.400 --> 0:23:41.959
<v Speaker 1>like our show, please head on over to Apple Podcasts

0:23:42.040 --> 0:23:45.760
<v Speaker 1>or wherever you listen to podcasts, rate review, and subscribe.

0:23:45.880 --> 0:23:48.280
<v Speaker 1>This episode was hosted by me David Merritt and me

0:23:48.400 --> 0:23:51.960
<v Speaker 1>Franci Laqua. It was produced by Summersadi, additional editing by

0:23:51.960 --> 0:23:54.960
<v Speaker 1>Blake Maples and special thanks to Nigel Wilson.