WEBVTT - Finders Keepers: IPO, XAI, Subs

0:00:02.720 --> 0:00:10.840
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg Audio Studios, Podcasts, Radio News. Hello and welcome to

0:00:10.840 --> 0:00:13.720
<v Speaker 1>The Money Stuff Podcast. You're a weekly podcast where we

0:00:13.760 --> 0:00:17.360
<v Speaker 1>talk about stuff related to money. I'm Matt Levian and

0:00:17.440 --> 0:00:19.480
<v Speaker 1>I write the Money Stuff column for Bloomberg Opinion.

0:00:19.720 --> 0:00:22.200
<v Speaker 2>And I'm Katie Greifeld, a reporter for Bloomberg News and

0:00:22.239 --> 0:00:23.759
<v Speaker 2>an anchor for Bloomberg Television.

0:00:25.480 --> 0:00:27.680
<v Speaker 1>That's Today. It was an all tariffs episode of The

0:00:27.680 --> 0:00:28.400
<v Speaker 1>Money suff.

0:00:30.640 --> 0:00:33.800
<v Speaker 2>I actually would be the most prepared out in any

0:00:33.840 --> 0:00:35.040
<v Speaker 2>episode that we've ever done.

0:00:36.479 --> 0:00:39.280
<v Speaker 1>We're talking about tariffs, non fought for forty eight hours.

0:00:39.320 --> 0:00:42.680
<v Speaker 2>I was actually at my Grandmam's apartment last night, or

0:00:42.720 --> 0:00:44.200
<v Speaker 2>I guess in the afternoon.

0:00:43.760 --> 0:00:44.560
<v Speaker 1>Talking about taffs.

0:00:44.640 --> 0:00:46.159
<v Speaker 2>Well, I was with my dad, and my dad and

0:00:46.159 --> 0:00:47.800
<v Speaker 2>I both were like, can we turn on the TV?

0:00:48.479 --> 0:00:51.120
<v Speaker 2>My grandma was like sure, yeah, so we watched it

0:00:51.159 --> 0:01:02.080
<v Speaker 2>with her. No, yeah, the Rose Garden. Anyway, we're not

0:01:02.120 --> 0:01:06.639
<v Speaker 2>talking about tariffs. We are talking about a conservative leaning

0:01:06.720 --> 0:01:07.720
<v Speaker 2>news network.

0:01:07.360 --> 0:01:09.479
<v Speaker 1>That in public conservative leading. Yeah.

0:01:09.560 --> 0:01:12.040
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, I don't know what news Max does. I probably should.

0:01:12.360 --> 0:01:14.000
<v Speaker 1>They're a television channel that I know.

0:01:14.120 --> 0:01:14.840
<v Speaker 2>I've never watched them.

0:01:14.880 --> 0:01:18.319
<v Speaker 1>They've take out the vast territory to the far right

0:01:18.360 --> 0:01:19.640
<v Speaker 1>of Fox News is.

0:01:19.600 --> 0:01:22.080
<v Speaker 2>My understanding of it, them, you know, and their IPO.

0:01:22.280 --> 0:01:25.400
<v Speaker 2>At one point they had a market value of over

0:01:25.520 --> 0:01:29.640
<v Speaker 2>thirty billion dollars, which had them more valuable than Fox

0:01:30.200 --> 0:01:32.040
<v Speaker 2>for a brief moments of time. The stock has since

0:01:32.080 --> 0:01:33.240
<v Speaker 2>started to come back to earth.

0:01:33.640 --> 0:01:36.479
<v Speaker 1>I don't pretend to understand this anymore. Yeah, the meme thing,

0:01:36.640 --> 0:01:38.960
<v Speaker 1>like the meme ipo thing. I think of this in

0:01:39.000 --> 0:01:41.960
<v Speaker 1>comparison to Trumpet Media and technology grew up the other

0:01:42.640 --> 0:01:47.000
<v Speaker 1>let's say, right wing media network. Maybe that also has

0:01:47.040 --> 0:01:50.560
<v Speaker 1>a very high valuation relative to its fairly low revenue

0:01:51.160 --> 0:01:55.240
<v Speaker 1>and net loss, and trump Media is owned by people

0:01:55.280 --> 0:01:59.000
<v Speaker 1>who are like, yeah, great, but like News is probably

0:01:59.040 --> 0:02:02.680
<v Speaker 1>owned by Thomas Pettif, who, in addition to being a

0:02:02.720 --> 0:02:05.520
<v Speaker 1>billionaire Republican downer, is also like a trader, you know,

0:02:05.720 --> 0:02:09.160
<v Speaker 1>Like he's the founder of Attractor Breakers, So like the ft.

0:02:09.240 --> 0:02:10.480
<v Speaker 1>You got him on the phone and he was like,

0:02:10.720 --> 0:02:13.000
<v Speaker 1>he said, he was stunned by the price. I think

0:02:13.040 --> 0:02:14.800
<v Speaker 1>newsbacks is a great company, and it's going to have

0:02:14.800 --> 0:02:16.320
<v Speaker 1>a very bread feature, but I think that it does

0:02:16.360 --> 0:02:19.000
<v Speaker 1>not warrant this high price. It was just like, you know,

0:02:19.600 --> 0:02:21.360
<v Speaker 1>in addition to being a real billionaire, he's like a

0:02:21.440 --> 0:02:23.080
<v Speaker 1>billion dollars worth of Newsmax stock.

0:02:23.200 --> 0:02:25.760
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, he owns the second largest steak. It was at

0:02:25.760 --> 0:02:29.079
<v Speaker 2>one point worth at least five point four billion dollars.

0:02:29.120 --> 0:02:30.040
<v Speaker 2>I wonder if he's sold.

0:02:30.120 --> 0:02:32.040
<v Speaker 1>I think he's locked up. Really, I think like to

0:02:32.080 --> 0:02:33.560
<v Speaker 1>ask him, like, are you going to sell? And you

0:02:33.600 --> 0:02:36.560
<v Speaker 1>know I can change before the long most big sharelders

0:02:36.560 --> 0:02:39.560
<v Speaker 1>are locked up in IPOs like that. And it's funny,

0:02:39.600 --> 0:02:41.680
<v Speaker 1>like for the same reason that the thigh prices, some

0:02:41.720 --> 0:02:44.360
<v Speaker 1>of the commentary that you'll read from enthusiasts is not

0:02:44.400 --> 0:02:46.920
<v Speaker 1>always well informed. And I read someone being like, what

0:02:47.000 --> 0:02:49.080
<v Speaker 1>will Newsmacks do with all of this capital while they

0:02:49.200 --> 0:02:51.359
<v Speaker 1>use it to become the next big media, Like they're

0:02:51.400 --> 0:02:53.200
<v Speaker 1>not getting any capital. It's just like the stock is

0:02:53.200 --> 0:02:55.440
<v Speaker 1>trading in the secondary market. You know, there's like a

0:02:55.480 --> 0:02:59.200
<v Speaker 1>real move among meme stocks that if your stock is meaning,

0:02:59.520 --> 0:03:01.920
<v Speaker 1>you should get off at the market stock offering so

0:03:01.919 --> 0:03:03.640
<v Speaker 1>you can raise money from the people who are buying

0:03:03.639 --> 0:03:06.200
<v Speaker 1>your stock in the secondary market and pushing out the price.

0:03:06.320 --> 0:03:08.000
<v Speaker 1>But you can't do that a week after your IPO

0:03:08.160 --> 0:03:10.480
<v Speaker 1>R three days after your ip Newsmax is not selling

0:03:10.480 --> 0:03:12.560
<v Speaker 1>any stock. I mean they sold stock at ten dollars

0:03:12.600 --> 0:03:15.120
<v Speaker 1>before the run in the stock. But they're not making

0:03:15.160 --> 0:03:17.320
<v Speaker 1>any money from this. This is just secondary training.

0:03:17.360 --> 0:03:20.520
<v Speaker 2>They're not making money in general. They lost seventy two

0:03:20.639 --> 0:03:21.480
<v Speaker 2>million dollars.

0:03:21.520 --> 0:03:23.400
<v Speaker 1>These are separate things. If you're a meme stock, you

0:03:23.400 --> 0:03:25.079
<v Speaker 1>don't make money in your business. Do you make money

0:03:25.120 --> 0:03:26.480
<v Speaker 1>selling stock? But they're not even doing that.

0:03:26.520 --> 0:03:28.760
<v Speaker 2>I'm old fashioned, mad, I like to go back to

0:03:28.800 --> 0:03:33.320
<v Speaker 2>the That's true. I guess it's hard to predict what

0:03:33.639 --> 0:03:36.320
<v Speaker 2>will become a meme stock. I would not have guessed

0:03:36.320 --> 0:03:38.000
<v Speaker 2>that Newsmax was a candidate.

0:03:38.120 --> 0:03:40.360
<v Speaker 1>No, not really really.

0:03:40.600 --> 0:03:44.480
<v Speaker 2>Apparently, Chris Ruddy, though the CEO, was going on like

0:03:44.560 --> 0:03:48.320
<v Speaker 2>cable news and pitching the IPO, which I didn't know.

0:03:48.400 --> 0:03:49.400
<v Speaker 2>Had I known that, maybe I.

0:03:49.360 --> 0:03:50.520
<v Speaker 1>Would to a TV channel.

0:03:50.760 --> 0:03:54.040
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, that's true, but he was going on others, not

0:03:54.080 --> 0:03:58.480
<v Speaker 2>Bloomberg News. To the best of my knowledge. On the podcast,

0:03:58.800 --> 0:04:02.480
<v Speaker 2>I that's true, Chris Heiretti, if you're listening, I want

0:04:02.520 --> 0:04:04.840
<v Speaker 2>to talk a little bit about the mechanics of this IPO.

0:04:05.000 --> 0:04:07.440
<v Speaker 2>I was chatting with Bailey Lipschultz Bloomberg News about this.

0:04:07.520 --> 0:04:11.440
<v Speaker 2>He's my go to guy. Yeah, on funky things. He

0:04:11.440 --> 0:04:15.440
<v Speaker 2>also covers IPOs, which is a really poetic intersection. So

0:04:15.520 --> 0:04:20.039
<v Speaker 2>this was a regulation A plus it's a mini ipo.

0:04:20.080 --> 0:04:21.040
<v Speaker 1>Okay, mini ipo?

0:04:21.200 --> 0:04:23.960
<v Speaker 2>Yeah yeah, I didn't know that. And the reason I

0:04:23.960 --> 0:04:26.760
<v Speaker 2>found out is because I have another Matt in my

0:04:26.839 --> 0:04:29.080
<v Speaker 2>professional life. His name is Matt Miller, and he was like, wow,

0:04:29.160 --> 0:04:32.720
<v Speaker 2>the bank must have really mispriced this. And Billy made

0:04:32.720 --> 0:04:36.239
<v Speaker 2>the good point that because it's a reggae plus ipo,

0:04:36.400 --> 0:04:38.240
<v Speaker 2>they can only raise up to seventy five million, So

0:04:38.240 --> 0:04:40.679
<v Speaker 2>it's not like this was mispriced or anything.

0:04:41.480 --> 0:04:46.800
<v Speaker 1>I mean, you can solve your shares. Who are the banks?

0:04:47.520 --> 0:04:52.080
<v Speaker 2>Oh, I'm so excited. Do you ask Digital Offering LLC? Oh? Yeah, yeah,

0:04:52.320 --> 0:04:55.400
<v Speaker 2>Business Insider. I don't think you've seen this yet. Business Insider,

0:04:55.600 --> 0:04:58.360
<v Speaker 2>just as we're talking about this on a Thursday, published

0:04:58.360 --> 0:05:02.880
<v Speaker 2>a story titled Meet the tiny investment bank behind Newsmax's

0:05:03.080 --> 0:05:07.920
<v Speaker 2>rip roaring stock debut. Laguna Beach, California based Digital Offering

0:05:08.080 --> 0:05:11.120
<v Speaker 2>LLC was the bank behind this. Can I tell you

0:05:11.160 --> 0:05:12.039
<v Speaker 2>more facts about them?

0:05:12.520 --> 0:05:14.640
<v Speaker 1>I want to hear all of the facts about them.

0:05:14.720 --> 0:05:17.960
<v Speaker 2>I'll tell you at least three. They have ten full

0:05:18.000 --> 0:05:22.880
<v Speaker 2>time registered banker, three of whom act as principal investment bankers.

0:05:23.360 --> 0:05:27.000
<v Speaker 2>They typically advise companies valued at a billion dollars or less.

0:05:27.200 --> 0:05:29.440
<v Speaker 2>Those are actually all the facts I have. But I

0:05:29.480 --> 0:05:33.719
<v Speaker 2>have a quote from Mark Alenowitz. I hope I'm saying

0:05:33.720 --> 0:05:36.880
<v Speaker 2>his name correctly. He's a managing director there. He said,

0:05:36.880 --> 0:05:40.360
<v Speaker 2>the Newsmax, as you might predict, has been huge for them.

0:05:40.880 --> 0:05:43.320
<v Speaker 2>The small cap community knows who we are, but the

0:05:43.320 --> 0:05:46.400
<v Speaker 2>rest of Wall Street didn't. But now they're on the map.

0:05:47.040 --> 0:05:49.400
<v Speaker 1>So I'm still highly open the idea that the bank's

0:05:49.400 --> 0:05:51.200
<v Speaker 1>miss priced today because like I used to be an

0:05:51.200 --> 0:05:53.520
<v Speaker 1>equity capital markets banker, I think of like, well you

0:05:53.560 --> 0:05:55.680
<v Speaker 1>do an IPO is you go out to institutional accounts

0:05:55.680 --> 0:05:57.800
<v Speaker 1>and you build a book of institutional accounts and you

0:05:57.839 --> 0:06:00.320
<v Speaker 1>put some stuff with retail. But you go to an

0:06:00.320 --> 0:06:02.520
<v Speaker 1>institution and you're like, well we lost seventy million dollars

0:06:02.520 --> 0:06:04.760
<v Speaker 1>one hundred seventy million over revenue. There's some cap to

0:06:04.800 --> 0:06:07.919
<v Speaker 1>the valuation you're going to get, right, And if you

0:06:08.160 --> 0:06:10.839
<v Speaker 1>trade on the secondary market to retail, there is not

0:06:11.000 --> 0:06:12.880
<v Speaker 1>that cap or any cap right, Like you can be

0:06:12.920 --> 0:06:15.640
<v Speaker 1>a thirty billion dollar company for briefly if you have

0:06:15.760 --> 0:06:20.200
<v Speaker 1>those kind of numbers. And so if you go to

0:06:20.800 --> 0:06:23.359
<v Speaker 1>institutional investors and say this is going to be a

0:06:23.400 --> 0:06:25.239
<v Speaker 1>memes talks that are prising it at two hundred dollars,

0:06:25.600 --> 0:06:27.839
<v Speaker 1>they will laugh at you. By the way, I don't

0:06:27.839 --> 0:06:29.320
<v Speaker 1>want to say black Ben tried that, but like.

0:06:29.440 --> 0:06:31.840
<v Speaker 2>A little bit, a little bit friend of the show.

0:06:31.720 --> 0:06:35.480
<v Speaker 1>Front of the show, Black they did it. But I

0:06:35.480 --> 0:06:37.120
<v Speaker 1>don't think that's the case here because the Reggae plus

0:06:37.200 --> 0:06:39.000
<v Speaker 1>offering done by a small bank might have been you know,

0:06:39.120 --> 0:06:40.840
<v Speaker 1>it was for the small cap community. It's not like

0:06:40.880 --> 0:06:44.240
<v Speaker 1>they're selling this to fidelity necessarily. Yeah, so maybe they

0:06:44.240 --> 0:06:46.640
<v Speaker 1>did misprice it as a meme matter. I don't know.

0:06:47.000 --> 0:06:49.520
<v Speaker 2>I don't know. Well, it'll be interesting to see their

0:06:49.560 --> 0:06:53.440
<v Speaker 2>follow up to the newsmac's debut digital offering LLC.

0:06:53.960 --> 0:06:57.560
<v Speaker 1>It does feel like a real golden age for like

0:06:57.600 --> 0:06:59.960
<v Speaker 1>a certain sort of like banker who is happy to

0:07:00.040 --> 0:07:03.920
<v Speaker 1>work with memestock companies. Right, stuff going on? Does it

0:07:04.279 --> 0:07:07.119
<v Speaker 1>going on that, like, you know, not necessarily everything wants

0:07:07.160 --> 0:07:07.840
<v Speaker 1>to be doing.

0:07:08.000 --> 0:07:09.720
<v Speaker 2>I don't know, I feel like the golden age might

0:07:09.760 --> 0:07:13.240
<v Speaker 2>have been twenty twenty one, like these are like the

0:07:13.960 --> 0:07:17.120
<v Speaker 2>kind of thing or yeah, obviously you're still having some

0:07:17.200 --> 0:07:20.080
<v Speaker 2>memes stock IPOs, but there's just not a lot of

0:07:20.120 --> 0:07:21.720
<v Speaker 2>IPOs and I don't know.

0:07:21.760 --> 0:07:24.960
<v Speaker 1>A lot of that's right, looking at a relative golden

0:07:25.000 --> 0:07:27.800
<v Speaker 1>age for the yeah memes stock bankers compared to the

0:07:27.880 --> 0:07:30.960
<v Speaker 1>you know, large cap it's true tech bankers.

0:07:31.080 --> 0:07:35.400
<v Speaker 2>Everyone else could talk about circle you know what to

0:07:36.160 --> 0:07:40.480
<v Speaker 2>also in IPOs, this one hasn't happened yet, but it's

0:07:40.520 --> 0:07:44.440
<v Speaker 2>going to theoretically circle of stable coin fame has filed

0:07:44.440 --> 0:07:45.000
<v Speaker 2>for an IPO.

0:07:45.080 --> 0:07:46.880
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, they filed like a long time ago, but their

0:07:47.120 --> 0:07:50.000
<v Speaker 1>filing became public this day. They filed like under yeah,

0:07:50.040 --> 0:07:53.360
<v Speaker 1>another special IPO rule, which is you can file confidentially,

0:07:53.400 --> 0:07:56.120
<v Speaker 1>but now they're unconfidential, so you can read their filings.

0:07:56.560 --> 0:07:59.000
<v Speaker 2>Got some numbers. One hundred and fifty six million dollars,

0:07:59.200 --> 0:08:01.520
<v Speaker 2>that's their net in. That's on revenue of one point

0:08:01.640 --> 0:08:05.160
<v Speaker 2>six eight billion dollars in twenty twenty four. My only

0:08:05.600 --> 0:08:08.920
<v Speaker 2>simple question for you is how does the stable coin

0:08:09.000 --> 0:08:11.360
<v Speaker 2>make money? Is that just because they're backed.

0:08:11.000 --> 0:08:15.720
<v Speaker 1>By how they're making Yeah, that's it. So oh yeah,

0:08:15.720 --> 0:08:17.440
<v Speaker 1>it's the best business in the world. And it's actually like,

0:08:17.600 --> 0:08:19.400
<v Speaker 1>it was surprising to me that their margins are so low,

0:08:19.440 --> 0:08:22.200
<v Speaker 1>and it's it's a little interesting why their margins aren't

0:08:22.200 --> 0:08:24.520
<v Speaker 1>one hundred percent. Yeah, but no they make money by

0:08:24.560 --> 0:08:27.200
<v Speaker 1>like they take tens of billions of dollars of deposits

0:08:27.200 --> 0:08:30.120
<v Speaker 1>from customers. You know, I read about this. They don't

0:08:30.160 --> 0:08:34.560
<v Speaker 1>directly put it in T bills because I think my

0:08:34.679 --> 0:08:36.920
<v Speaker 1>explanation would be like that is too much of like

0:08:36.960 --> 0:08:40.560
<v Speaker 1>a banking function or a financial services function, and they're

0:08:40.600 --> 0:08:42.640
<v Speaker 1>like a fintech. So what they do is they take

0:08:42.640 --> 0:08:43.800
<v Speaker 1>all the money and they put it in a black

0:08:43.840 --> 0:08:46.160
<v Speaker 1>Rock money market fund that puts it in T bills.

0:08:46.280 --> 0:08:46.880
<v Speaker 2>That's amazing.

0:08:46.920 --> 0:08:48.520
<v Speaker 1>Effectively, they put it in T bills and they pay

0:08:48.559 --> 0:08:51.080
<v Speaker 1>black Rock to be a sort of like adults custodian

0:08:51.120 --> 0:08:53.240
<v Speaker 1>in their T bills. Yeah, they put someone in bank accounts,

0:08:53.240 --> 0:08:55.040
<v Speaker 1>but it's like eighty five percent T bills. They say

0:08:55.080 --> 0:08:56.920
<v Speaker 1>they make a discount to sover, but they kind of

0:08:56.920 --> 0:09:02.439
<v Speaker 1>make T bill rits and then they pay as a

0:09:02.480 --> 0:09:06.480
<v Speaker 1>first cut zero percent interest to their customers. Now it's

0:09:06.480 --> 0:09:09.559
<v Speaker 1>like quite right, it's basically right. So they're making you know,

0:09:10.640 --> 0:09:13.480
<v Speaker 1>four percent or so on tens of billions of dollars,

0:09:13.600 --> 0:09:15.520
<v Speaker 1>and that might be a slight exaggeration, but it's like,

0:09:15.559 --> 0:09:18.120
<v Speaker 1>you know, they're making a lot of money, and then

0:09:18.679 --> 0:09:20.080
<v Speaker 1>where does it go? I mean some of it is

0:09:20.080 --> 0:09:22.079
<v Speaker 1>like they have expenses because they are a tech company.

0:09:22.120 --> 0:09:25.760
<v Speaker 1>They're building for sure, technological infrastructure to transfer stable coins

0:09:25.840 --> 0:09:29.280
<v Speaker 1>on the blockchain, et cetera, outside et cetera. Another big

0:09:29.320 --> 0:09:31.640
<v Speaker 1>part of it is like everyone knows this is a

0:09:31.679 --> 0:09:35.000
<v Speaker 1>good business model. It's not quite it's quite a business

0:09:35.000 --> 0:09:36.680
<v Speaker 1>a winner take all business model, but it's a little

0:09:36.679 --> 0:09:38.679
<v Speaker 1>bit like you want to be the most liquid stable coin,

0:09:39.000 --> 0:09:42.160
<v Speaker 1>and so they are paying platforms to be like a

0:09:42.200 --> 0:09:44.680
<v Speaker 1>preferred stable coin, so like they're the stable coin of coinbase,

0:09:45.080 --> 0:09:48.240
<v Speaker 1>and like there's a partnership with coinbase, and if their

0:09:48.600 --> 0:09:50.679
<v Speaker 1>coins are held on coin Base, like they're paying Coinbase

0:09:50.679 --> 0:09:52.480
<v Speaker 1>a lot of the interest. Right, They're paying fees to

0:09:52.520 --> 0:09:55.360
<v Speaker 1>buyance to be on binance, So there's some amount of like,

0:09:55.920 --> 0:09:57.520
<v Speaker 1>you know, this is a good business, and so the

0:09:57.559 --> 0:09:59.920
<v Speaker 1>customer acquisition cost is kind of they're paying something.

0:10:00.440 --> 0:10:02.079
<v Speaker 2>But it feels like it's only a good business when

0:10:02.160 --> 0:10:02.720
<v Speaker 2>rates are high.

0:10:03.280 --> 0:10:07.400
<v Speaker 1>So, right, it's such an interesting business because it's stumbled

0:10:07.400 --> 0:10:10.040
<v Speaker 1>into being a good business. It started. The stable coin

0:10:10.080 --> 0:10:13.120
<v Speaker 1>business started when rates were low, and everyone was like, well,

0:10:13.280 --> 0:10:15.240
<v Speaker 1>it's fine if we don't get paid interest, because it

0:10:15.360 --> 0:10:16.880
<v Speaker 1>was interested. You know, you don't get interest on our

0:10:16.880 --> 0:10:20.120
<v Speaker 1>savings accounts, on our money market account. So it's fine. Yeah,

0:10:20.200 --> 0:10:21.640
<v Speaker 1>And now the rates are high and you do get

0:10:21.679 --> 0:10:25.200
<v Speaker 1>interest on your money market account, and the stablegin issuers

0:10:25.240 --> 0:10:30.079
<v Speaker 1>are raking in money, and there are reasons that you

0:10:30.160 --> 0:10:33.920
<v Speaker 1>can't just easily natively get that interest on your stable coin. Yeah.

0:10:33.960 --> 0:10:37.720
<v Speaker 1>Think one reason is, like you know, that's like historically

0:10:37.800 --> 0:10:39.680
<v Speaker 1>not how it developed, and like you know, the biggest

0:10:39.720 --> 0:10:42.760
<v Speaker 1>stablekind issuers have ever liquidity advantage and they don't want

0:10:42.760 --> 0:10:45.560
<v Speaker 1>to pay interest. But another reason is, like there's securities,

0:10:45.559 --> 0:10:47.480
<v Speaker 1>a lot problems with doing it. If you were paying

0:10:47.520 --> 0:10:49.040
<v Speaker 1>interest on a stable clin it's not in like the

0:10:49.200 --> 0:10:51.400
<v Speaker 1>sort of crypto e gray area where it's probably fine.

0:10:51.440 --> 0:10:53.880
<v Speaker 1>It's a money market fund and it's security. And I

0:10:53.960 --> 0:10:56.000
<v Speaker 1>mean this is at least the sec theory as of

0:10:56.480 --> 0:10:59.920
<v Speaker 1>four months ago. And one thing that I have written

0:11:00.160 --> 0:11:02.600
<v Speaker 1>for a long time is that clearly people are going

0:11:02.760 --> 0:11:06.800
<v Speaker 1>to just start issuing interest sparing stable coins that are

0:11:06.880 --> 0:11:09.440
<v Speaker 1>you know, registered money market funds that trade on a blockchain.

0:11:09.920 --> 0:11:11.880
<v Speaker 1>And if you look at the Circle IPO documents, like

0:11:11.960 --> 0:11:14.199
<v Speaker 1>they talk about that, like they have an issuer that

0:11:14.320 --> 0:11:16.720
<v Speaker 1>does that that has like a small money market fund

0:11:17.040 --> 0:11:20.559
<v Speaker 1>and they are doing essentially an intersparing stable coin that

0:11:20.600 --> 0:11:24.000
<v Speaker 1>you can convert into like their regular coin. And they

0:11:24.120 --> 0:11:25.959
<v Speaker 1>kind of hint and I'm sure that there will be

0:11:26.040 --> 0:11:28.000
<v Speaker 1>more of that and like ultimately some of this, like

0:11:28.600 --> 0:11:31.079
<v Speaker 1>free money, will be returned to customers.

0:11:31.640 --> 0:11:33.880
<v Speaker 2>Why am I thinking of black Rock and Securitized don't

0:11:33.920 --> 0:11:35.040
<v Speaker 2>they have something everyone has?

0:11:35.240 --> 0:11:38.920
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, has a tokenized market fund circle I think owns

0:11:39.440 --> 0:11:41.960
<v Speaker 1>a company that does it in addition to like having

0:11:42.200 --> 0:11:45.080
<v Speaker 1>their stablegoin money out of black Rock fund. Yeah, everyone's

0:11:45.080 --> 0:11:48.280
<v Speaker 1>doing it. Franklin Templeton did it, like in twenty nineteen.

0:11:48.360 --> 0:11:50.839
<v Speaker 1>I watched their Recognize one remember that, Yeah, And I

0:11:50.960 --> 0:11:53.319
<v Speaker 1>was like, why is it not called the Benjamin And

0:11:53.440 --> 0:11:54.280
<v Speaker 1>no one had a good answer.

0:11:55.080 --> 0:11:58.200
<v Speaker 2>I am excited to see how this is received when

0:11:58.360 --> 0:12:02.640
<v Speaker 2>it eventually does become public, because I know, you know,

0:12:02.679 --> 0:12:06.400
<v Speaker 2>you think about all the other like crypto equities. I

0:12:06.559 --> 0:12:08.880
<v Speaker 2>imagine this is going to trade similarly to the price

0:12:08.920 --> 0:12:11.240
<v Speaker 2>of bitcoin, even though maybe it shouldn't if it's I mean,

0:12:11.280 --> 0:12:13.800
<v Speaker 2>it's really just a money market fund with a lot

0:12:13.840 --> 0:12:16.160
<v Speaker 2>of I mean, like you know, as a first cut.

0:12:16.200 --> 0:12:17.760
<v Speaker 1>Their business is kind of like what is the market

0:12:17.840 --> 0:12:20.600
<v Speaker 1>cap of like their coins outstanding and like the market

0:12:20.640 --> 0:12:22.760
<v Speaker 1>cap of stable coins outstanding does have a lot to

0:12:22.840 --> 0:12:24.440
<v Speaker 1>do with like demand for crypto.

0:12:24.679 --> 0:12:26.959
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, that's true. It's not as direct though, as like

0:12:28.400 --> 0:12:32.120
<v Speaker 2>no micro strategy owns a ton of points, so it's

0:12:32.160 --> 0:12:34.080
<v Speaker 2>not exactly a proxy. It's obviously not.

0:12:34.160 --> 0:12:36.360
<v Speaker 1>A pricy for bitcoin. I always think about like Golden

0:12:36.440 --> 0:12:38.480
<v Speaker 1>used to say that, like their business is at on

0:12:38.600 --> 0:12:41.160
<v Speaker 1>global GDP, and like the stable grend business is a

0:12:41.240 --> 0:12:44.000
<v Speaker 1>bet on like crypto GDP. Right, like if if crypto

0:12:44.120 --> 0:12:46.040
<v Speaker 1>is booming, like there will be more demand for stable

0:12:46.120 --> 0:12:49.520
<v Speaker 1>clins Now they're separately like a competitive dynamic and table

0:12:49.559 --> 0:12:51.600
<v Speaker 1>coins where like they might lose out to other stable coins.

0:12:51.840 --> 0:12:55.280
<v Speaker 1>And there's like the business model of like we get

0:12:55.400 --> 0:12:58.440
<v Speaker 1>interest and don't pay. Interest might be compressed and they

0:12:58.520 --> 0:13:00.880
<v Speaker 1>might have to pay more interest, like you know probably

0:13:00.920 --> 0:13:03.560
<v Speaker 1>speaking like the more crypto there is, the more people

0:13:03.600 --> 0:13:04.560
<v Speaker 1>will want their stable colin.

0:13:04.720 --> 0:13:07.160
<v Speaker 2>I wonder like what the pitch to buy circle shares is,

0:13:07.520 --> 0:13:09.320
<v Speaker 2>especially if we have billions.

0:13:09.000 --> 0:13:10.719
<v Speaker 1>Of dollars we get paid interest.

0:13:10.440 --> 0:13:12.880
<v Speaker 2>That we don't pay, interest rates go down, Like what's

0:13:12.920 --> 0:13:13.520
<v Speaker 2>the point.

0:13:13.800 --> 0:13:16.599
<v Speaker 1>The pitch is? Like we are building the future of

0:13:17.120 --> 0:13:20.000
<v Speaker 1>financial infrastructure, Like there's like the real upside case is

0:13:20.080 --> 0:13:23.920
<v Speaker 1>like five years, the way that you normally pay for

0:13:24.040 --> 0:13:28.840
<v Speaker 1>stuff will be with a regulated US stable clin instead

0:13:28.880 --> 0:13:32.160
<v Speaker 1>of venmo or credit cards or checks or whatever. You

0:13:32.240 --> 0:13:36.319
<v Speaker 1>will boop some circle coins to someone, right, Like, that's

0:13:36.320 --> 0:13:37.080
<v Speaker 1>the upside case.

0:13:37.160 --> 0:13:39.000
<v Speaker 2>It's kind of coin to think we'll still be here

0:13:39.040 --> 0:13:57.600
<v Speaker 2>in five years. Yeah, right, man. You know we were

0:13:57.640 --> 0:14:06.040
<v Speaker 2>talking about right leaning like social media networks boy x X,

0:14:06.240 --> 0:14:11.240
<v Speaker 2>Twitter x X now part of x a I holdings. Yes, man,

0:14:11.520 --> 0:14:13.840
<v Speaker 2>so I obviously immediately thought of you on.

0:14:15.480 --> 0:14:19.040
<v Speaker 1>The chronic layer of Elon Musk's mergers and this technically.

0:14:19.320 --> 0:14:24.000
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, I thought about texting you, but I was it

0:14:24.120 --> 0:14:24.480
<v Speaker 2>was done.

0:14:24.880 --> 0:14:29.560
<v Speaker 1>You spared me, right. I remember saying that it seems like.

0:14:30.720 --> 0:14:32.840
<v Speaker 2>This though, isn't like that huge of a deal, Like

0:14:32.960 --> 0:14:35.520
<v Speaker 2>this didn't rock your world as much as some might

0:14:35.600 --> 0:14:36.360
<v Speaker 2>have expected it to.

0:14:36.640 --> 0:14:38.720
<v Speaker 1>It's the biggest mn A deal this year. Yeah, and

0:14:38.800 --> 0:14:43.320
<v Speaker 1>the second biggest, actually maybe the first biggest is Elon

0:14:43.400 --> 0:14:46.920
<v Speaker 1>Musk's very biggest I mean like from like the Bloomberg table,

0:14:47.120 --> 0:14:51.600
<v Speaker 1>which counts announced deals including announced hostile deals. And the

0:14:51.680 --> 0:14:54.880
<v Speaker 1>biggest deal this year is Elon's deal to BioPen Ai,

0:14:55.120 --> 0:14:56.880
<v Speaker 1>which is not a deal. It's just a bid, and

0:14:56.960 --> 0:14:59.640
<v Speaker 1>it's not it's not really a bit, it's a piece

0:14:59.680 --> 0:15:02.120
<v Speaker 1>of warm. It's hard. But the second biggest is this deal,

0:15:02.160 --> 0:15:05.480
<v Speaker 1>which is a let's say forty five billion dollar acquisition

0:15:05.680 --> 0:15:08.520
<v Speaker 1>or like a you know, one hundred and twenty five

0:15:08.600 --> 0:15:11.840
<v Speaker 1>billion dollar total enterprise value of the all stock merger.

0:15:12.360 --> 0:15:15.240
<v Speaker 1>It's pretty big deal, except it's like, you know, it's

0:15:15.240 --> 0:15:17.760
<v Speaker 1>two companies he owns, or now one company that owns.

0:15:18.480 --> 0:15:20.560
<v Speaker 2>I want to talk about valuations a little bit sure,

0:15:20.760 --> 0:15:23.680
<v Speaker 2>because it kind of feels like the Xai valuation. You

0:15:23.720 --> 0:15:24.920
<v Speaker 2>could poke a lot of holes in it.

0:15:25.360 --> 0:15:29.640
<v Speaker 1>So a couple of things. So XAI, the Ai company,

0:15:30.520 --> 0:15:34.240
<v Speaker 1>bought x the Twitter company, in an all stock deal.

0:15:35.080 --> 0:15:37.360
<v Speaker 1>So xa I assumed let's say twelve million dollars of

0:15:37.520 --> 0:15:41.320
<v Speaker 1>Twitter debt, and it paid let's say thirty three billion

0:15:41.360 --> 0:15:46.560
<v Speaker 1>dollars of stock for x What is thirty three billion

0:15:46.600 --> 0:15:47.520
<v Speaker 1>dollars worth of stock?

0:15:47.600 --> 0:15:47.720
<v Speaker 2>Mean?

0:15:47.840 --> 0:15:51.160
<v Speaker 1>Well, it means if you value Xai at eighty billion dollars,

0:15:51.720 --> 0:15:54.480
<v Speaker 1>then you give Twitter, you know, thirty three eightieths of that,

0:15:55.120 --> 0:15:58.960
<v Speaker 1>and that's thirty three billion dollars worth of stock. You

0:15:59.040 --> 0:16:02.320
<v Speaker 1>don't have to believe eitheraluation. What actually happened was that, like,

0:16:02.640 --> 0:16:05.960
<v Speaker 1>they merged at a ratio, right, the people who owned

0:16:06.240 --> 0:16:09.760
<v Speaker 1>Xai got eighty one hundred and thirteen so of the company,

0:16:09.800 --> 0:16:11.960
<v Speaker 1>and the people who owned Twitter got thirty three hundred

0:16:11.960 --> 0:16:15.160
<v Speaker 1>and thirteens of the company. And that was the ratio

0:16:15.240 --> 0:16:17.400
<v Speaker 1>that happened. They could have been worth eighty dollars and

0:16:17.560 --> 0:16:19.240
<v Speaker 1>thirty three dollars right, or they could have been worth

0:16:19.720 --> 0:16:22.120
<v Speaker 1>eighty billion dollars and thirty three billion dollars or any

0:16:22.160 --> 0:16:24.560
<v Speaker 1>other number in that ratio. So you don't have to

0:16:24.640 --> 0:16:28.480
<v Speaker 1>believe the valuations. And it's interesting, like the last round

0:16:28.480 --> 0:16:30.880
<v Speaker 1>where Xai raised cash, it was like, I think at

0:16:30.880 --> 0:16:32.520
<v Speaker 1>a fifty one billion.

0:16:32.280 --> 0:16:35.520
<v Speaker 2>It was fifty one billion in December. You did point

0:16:35.520 --> 0:16:38.440
<v Speaker 2>out that in mid February, Bloomberg reported that Xai was

0:16:38.680 --> 0:16:41.760
<v Speaker 2>canvassing potential investors for a ten billion dollar funding round

0:16:41.800 --> 0:16:45.120
<v Speaker 2>that would value it at seventy five billion dollars. But

0:16:45.560 --> 0:16:46.480
<v Speaker 2>I think that happened.

0:16:47.360 --> 0:16:51.480
<v Speaker 1>X raised money recently at a you know, I've been

0:16:51.520 --> 0:16:53.360
<v Speaker 1>saying thirty three and forty five thirty three million dollar

0:16:53.400 --> 0:16:56.880
<v Speaker 1>equity evaluation, forty five billion dollars enterprise eye, Like that

0:16:57.040 --> 0:17:00.520
<v Speaker 1>was a weird round. And one thing about it is

0:17:00.520 --> 0:17:04.840
<v Speaker 1>like Elon Musk put in some money, and in hindsight,

0:17:05.480 --> 0:17:07.080
<v Speaker 1>you could sort of be like, well, they were doing

0:17:07.160 --> 0:17:09.440
<v Speaker 1>that to like print a trade at that price, so

0:17:09.520 --> 0:17:13.240
<v Speaker 1>they could justify doing the merger at that price, because

0:17:13.280 --> 0:17:15.240
<v Speaker 1>like you know, there was like talk of like X

0:17:15.320 --> 0:17:17.399
<v Speaker 1>being down fifty percent from where he bought it, and

0:17:17.440 --> 0:17:19.200
<v Speaker 1>I think it's nice for him to close it out

0:17:19.680 --> 0:17:22.119
<v Speaker 1>at the price that he paid for it. Yeah, but

0:17:22.280 --> 0:17:23.960
<v Speaker 1>like you know, you don't have to believe any of

0:17:23.960 --> 0:17:27.639
<v Speaker 1>those valuations because in a rough sense, like what happened

0:17:27.680 --> 0:17:30.680
<v Speaker 1>here was that Elon Musk owns two companies and he's

0:17:30.720 --> 0:17:33.159
<v Speaker 1>mushed them into one company. It doesn't matter what the

0:17:33.240 --> 0:17:36.000
<v Speaker 1>valuation was. Now that's not quite true because there are

0:17:36.680 --> 0:17:39.720
<v Speaker 1>minority shareolders in both companies, but like they're like along

0:17:39.800 --> 0:17:41.600
<v Speaker 1>for the ride. They don't they don't get us say

0:17:41.640 --> 0:17:43.399
<v Speaker 1>that they're not going to complain about the valuations of

0:17:43.440 --> 0:17:44.000
<v Speaker 1>any of these things.

0:17:44.160 --> 0:17:46.880
<v Speaker 2>So I mean, are there any anti trust concerns here

0:17:47.000 --> 0:17:47.320
<v Speaker 2>at all?

0:17:47.440 --> 0:17:50.960
<v Speaker 1>Like ABC anything I mentioned, Like you know, usually you

0:17:51.400 --> 0:17:53.720
<v Speaker 1>have some delay between signing and closing because you have

0:17:53.800 --> 0:17:57.280
<v Speaker 1>to like fill out anti trust forms. But someone pointed

0:17:57.320 --> 0:17:59.159
<v Speaker 1>out they're both owned by the same guy. Anyway, So

0:17:59.200 --> 0:18:02.280
<v Speaker 1>there's really no antigie concerns in many respects. The thing

0:18:02.359 --> 0:18:04.600
<v Speaker 1>to say I had this deal is those companies were

0:18:04.640 --> 0:18:09.320
<v Speaker 1>already the same company, So it doesn't really matter for antitrust,

0:18:09.400 --> 0:18:12.840
<v Speaker 1>or for fiduciary duties, or for valuation or for anything

0:18:12.880 --> 0:18:14.880
<v Speaker 1>else that they're emerging, Right, It's just like, yeah, sure,

0:18:14.920 --> 0:18:17.920
<v Speaker 1>it's like he's reshuffling the paperwork for his own companies. Yeah.

0:18:18.200 --> 0:18:19.520
<v Speaker 1>The one thing I'll say is, like why did he

0:18:19.760 --> 0:18:22.879
<v Speaker 1>merge them? One possible answer is that these are kind

0:18:22.920 --> 0:18:25.520
<v Speaker 1>of the same business and so like one reason that

0:18:25.880 --> 0:18:28.600
<v Speaker 1>I think Elon Musk has a bunch of separate companies

0:18:28.680 --> 0:18:30.920
<v Speaker 1>for all of the different ideas is like you want

0:18:30.960 --> 0:18:33.000
<v Speaker 1>to have like the companies have some focus and have

0:18:34.040 --> 0:18:37.280
<v Speaker 1>the employees of these companies have shares or options in

0:18:37.359 --> 0:18:39.399
<v Speaker 1>like their one companies. They're really motivated to do a

0:18:39.440 --> 0:18:41.560
<v Speaker 1>good job for that one company. And so like Tesla

0:18:41.640 --> 0:18:44.320
<v Speaker 1>and SpaceX are doing different things, so like move people

0:18:44.359 --> 0:18:46.480
<v Speaker 1>between them, but like you want to pay the Tesla

0:18:46.520 --> 0:18:49.240
<v Speaker 1>people in Tesla options and the SpaceX people and SpaceX options.

0:18:50.359 --> 0:18:52.520
<v Speaker 1>And I think that like there was a reason to

0:18:52.640 --> 0:18:55.600
<v Speaker 1>separate x and XAI because like AI was really hot

0:18:56.080 --> 0:18:58.280
<v Speaker 1>and he wanted to like raise money and like get

0:18:58.880 --> 0:19:02.880
<v Speaker 1>employees and pressed doing AI. But like increasingly I think

0:19:02.960 --> 0:19:06.800
<v Speaker 1>that they're the same business, which is that you collect

0:19:06.800 --> 0:19:09.600
<v Speaker 1>a lot of data like natural language of data and

0:19:09.840 --> 0:19:15.720
<v Speaker 1>information from the Twitter user corpus, right, and then you

0:19:15.880 --> 0:19:20.120
<v Speaker 1>feed that into models that are built by AI engineers

0:19:20.160 --> 0:19:23.640
<v Speaker 1>who work at XAI, and then you produce a large

0:19:23.680 --> 0:19:26.000
<v Speaker 1>language model you distribute through Twitter, right, Like their model

0:19:26.040 --> 0:19:26.800
<v Speaker 1>is distributed. It's like a.

0:19:28.600 --> 0:19:31.119
<v Speaker 2>I know what GROC is is because of Twitter obviously,

0:19:31.280 --> 0:19:32.359
<v Speaker 2>but that's like that's not weird.

0:19:32.400 --> 0:19:35.360
<v Speaker 1>Like every AA company is different, like trying to figure

0:19:35.359 --> 0:19:37.359
<v Speaker 1>out business models, but like a lot of stuff is

0:19:37.440 --> 0:19:40.080
<v Speaker 1>like there's a consumer distribution right where like open ai

0:19:40.680 --> 0:19:43.800
<v Speaker 1>among other products, sells access to you know, you could

0:19:43.840 --> 0:19:46.160
<v Speaker 1>like subscribe and have chat GPT, right and you pay

0:19:46.440 --> 0:19:48.960
<v Speaker 1>the fee every month to have like the consumer version

0:19:48.960 --> 0:19:52.040
<v Speaker 1>of Chat GPT and GROC is like that, and like

0:19:52.119 --> 0:19:54.480
<v Speaker 1>their distribution is through X and so it's increasing and

0:19:54.520 --> 0:19:55.920
<v Speaker 1>it's like this is the same business. It's like the

0:19:55.960 --> 0:19:58.000
<v Speaker 1>inputs and like the outputs are through X and like

0:19:58.080 --> 0:20:00.720
<v Speaker 1>the model in the middle has done through so like

0:20:00.800 --> 0:20:02.680
<v Speaker 1>everyone should be kind of working for the same goals.

0:20:02.720 --> 0:20:04.800
<v Speaker 1>And like motivated the same way. So we should merge

0:20:04.800 --> 0:20:08.160
<v Speaker 1>it so that like the employees are getting incentivized, yeah,

0:20:08.240 --> 0:20:09.080
<v Speaker 1>to help the whole system.

0:20:09.280 --> 0:20:11.560
<v Speaker 2>Well, it's a nice reminder that like nothing truly matters.

0:20:11.640 --> 0:20:15.920
<v Speaker 2>And I guess that my experience on X as a

0:20:16.040 --> 0:20:18.560
<v Speaker 2>user won't change, So I'm not particularly fussed about this.

0:20:18.640 --> 0:20:21.080
<v Speaker 2>I do want to go to the second element in your.

0:20:21.160 --> 0:20:23.280
<v Speaker 1>People were like, you know, like I wrote about this,

0:20:23.359 --> 0:20:24.440
<v Speaker 1>I got a lot of people have been like, but

0:20:24.560 --> 0:20:26.639
<v Speaker 1>now they're going to like steal all your data. They

0:20:26.680 --> 0:20:28.600
<v Speaker 1>are It's like they already were, like they all like

0:20:28.640 --> 0:20:31.879
<v Speaker 1>the commercial relationship like already existed X. I was already

0:20:31.920 --> 0:20:34.879
<v Speaker 1>paying X for like data and distribution, and like it

0:20:34.960 --> 0:20:38.520
<v Speaker 1>was already standing all your data sort of using all

0:20:38.560 --> 0:20:40.520
<v Speaker 1>of your data for sure. So there's no there's no

0:20:40.680 --> 0:20:41.760
<v Speaker 1>real change, I don't think.

0:20:42.000 --> 0:20:43.760
<v Speaker 2>I do want to go to the second element in

0:20:43.840 --> 0:20:47.760
<v Speaker 2>the Musk Mars conglomerate that you penned. You're right, nothing

0:20:47.840 --> 0:20:50.000
<v Speaker 2>is permanent, and if one of the company succeeds while

0:20:50.119 --> 0:20:53.919
<v Speaker 2>another one has some temporary struggles, the winner can subsidize

0:20:54.000 --> 0:20:58.760
<v Speaker 2>or buy the loser. Talking about Musk's portfolio of different companies, this.

0:20:58.880 --> 0:21:02.320
<v Speaker 1>Is like Tesla acquired Solar City years ago and a

0:21:02.400 --> 0:21:04.600
<v Speaker 1>deal that people suit over and they kind of kind

0:21:04.640 --> 0:21:06.560
<v Speaker 1>of looked like a ballout of some Yeah.

0:21:06.520 --> 0:21:09.720
<v Speaker 2>Well you could see the reverse logic and like Tesla

0:21:09.960 --> 0:21:13.280
<v Speaker 2>buying Xai in a distant reality because Tesla is really

0:21:13.760 --> 0:21:16.200
<v Speaker 2>in the hurt locker. But I don't think Xai could

0:21:16.200 --> 0:21:19.480
<v Speaker 2>buy Tesla. It still has a market cap of something.

0:21:19.560 --> 0:21:21.920
<v Speaker 1>They're saying buying it would be a merger. Merger, would

0:21:21.920 --> 0:21:25.280
<v Speaker 1>be a stock merger, and I think it would be

0:21:25.640 --> 0:21:28.280
<v Speaker 1>hard for a number of reasons, one of which is,

0:21:28.320 --> 0:21:30.160
<v Speaker 1>like I just made the case that x and xaire

0:21:30.240 --> 0:21:32.399
<v Speaker 1>the same business. Yes, this is a different business.

0:21:32.600 --> 0:21:33.240
<v Speaker 2>Yes that's true.

0:21:33.359 --> 0:21:35.480
<v Speaker 1>He's overlap or you're doing AI stuff to make the

0:21:35.560 --> 0:21:37.639
<v Speaker 1>self driving cars, but it's a pretty different business.

0:21:37.840 --> 0:21:39.439
<v Speaker 2>Hasn't he said that he wants Tesla to be an

0:21:39.480 --> 0:21:40.119
<v Speaker 2>AI company.

0:21:40.760 --> 0:21:43.359
<v Speaker 1>I might, Well, it is an AI self driving car

0:21:43.400 --> 0:21:46.080
<v Speaker 1>comp company, but it's very different, you know, but the

0:21:46.400 --> 0:21:49.040
<v Speaker 1>way there's some overlap, but it's not the same business

0:21:49.080 --> 0:21:52.280
<v Speaker 1>model or distribution. But then also like this deal is

0:21:52.320 --> 0:21:56.119
<v Speaker 1>so easy because they're private companies. M M. There are

0:21:56.200 --> 0:21:58.359
<v Speaker 1>shoulders other than him and both of these companies, but

0:21:58.480 --> 0:22:01.359
<v Speaker 1>like they're there because they him. They're not going to complain.

0:22:01.880 --> 0:22:04.920
<v Speaker 1>Dessa is a different situation, right, Like, every shareholder in

0:22:05.600 --> 0:22:08.840
<v Speaker 1>XAI or x is there because they like trust Elon

0:22:08.960 --> 0:22:11.760
<v Speaker 1>Musk and they want him to do stuff right, and

0:22:11.880 --> 0:22:14.159
<v Speaker 1>they will give him a lot of leeway to do

0:22:14.200 --> 0:22:18.080
<v Speaker 1>the stuff he thinks is good. Many vocal retail investors

0:22:18.680 --> 0:22:21.119
<v Speaker 1>vocal institutional investors too, and Tesla are like that, but

0:22:21.240 --> 0:22:23.600
<v Speaker 1>not all of them. No, Like, the one thing that

0:22:23.720 --> 0:22:26.400
<v Speaker 1>exists in Tesla is there are people who like really

0:22:26.480 --> 0:22:29.520
<v Speaker 1>don't like Elon Musk who will buy Tesla stock in

0:22:29.720 --> 0:22:31.959
<v Speaker 1>order to be able to complain about Elon Musk. Right,

0:22:32.119 --> 0:22:34.040
<v Speaker 1>Like I read this week about the controller of the

0:22:34.080 --> 0:22:37.679
<v Speaker 1>City of New York, Right, Like New York Pension funds

0:22:37.920 --> 0:22:41.080
<v Speaker 1>own a lot of Tesla stock. This is not because

0:22:41.080 --> 0:22:43.000
<v Speaker 1>they're huge Elon Musk fans, right, Some of it is

0:22:43.000 --> 0:22:46.119
<v Speaker 1>because they're like sort of indexy. Yeah, but also you

0:22:46.400 --> 0:22:48.320
<v Speaker 1>just do it to be like, I'll keep an eye

0:22:48.359 --> 0:22:50.840
<v Speaker 1>on that Elon Musk character. All own some of his stock,

0:22:51.200 --> 0:22:53.240
<v Speaker 1>and so like the controllers sent a letter to like

0:22:53.320 --> 0:22:56.320
<v Speaker 1>the legal department of the pension fund saying we should

0:22:56.359 --> 0:23:01.520
<v Speaker 1>sue Elon Musk because he is distracted by his role

0:23:01.840 --> 0:23:05.800
<v Speaker 1>in the government, and he is advocating policies that are

0:23:05.840 --> 0:23:08.520
<v Speaker 1>bad for Tesla, and like you know, they're like you say,

0:23:08.560 --> 0:23:10.600
<v Speaker 1>Tesla's in the hard locker. It's because like you know,

0:23:10.720 --> 0:23:13.040
<v Speaker 1>there's like boycotts and and stuff because people don't like.

0:23:14.359 --> 0:23:15.119
<v Speaker 2>That's one part of it.

0:23:15.200 --> 0:23:16.760
<v Speaker 1>But yeah, yeah, sure, right right.

0:23:16.800 --> 0:23:20.199
<v Speaker 2>The ha'd some pretty ugly delivery numbers, which I think some.

0:23:20.280 --> 0:23:23.080
<v Speaker 1>People, including the control of this city of New York,

0:23:23.119 --> 0:23:26.240
<v Speaker 1>would say is in part due to slackening demand because

0:23:26.840 --> 0:23:28.720
<v Speaker 1>people are mad at Elon Musk's politics.

0:23:28.800 --> 0:23:32.000
<v Speaker 2>Right, I'm also anti EV, and I think that I

0:23:32.000 --> 0:23:34.359
<v Speaker 2>don't know they've reached their addressable market on the.

0:23:34.720 --> 0:23:37.159
<v Speaker 1>Side, all right, But like if you think about the

0:23:37.200 --> 0:23:39.000
<v Speaker 1>people who are like in the addressable market or like

0:23:39.040 --> 0:23:40.840
<v Speaker 1>people are like I love an EV and the people

0:23:40.880 --> 0:23:44.240
<v Speaker 1>who are like I also love far right politics, like

0:23:44.680 --> 0:23:47.440
<v Speaker 1>you know, there's some disjunction there anyway, though, So like

0:23:47.560 --> 0:23:51.240
<v Speaker 1>the New York might sue for like securities fraud for doage,

0:23:51.359 --> 0:23:54.439
<v Speaker 1>which is you know, a real everything is security. But anyway,

0:23:54.520 --> 0:23:57.840
<v Speaker 1>my point is only that Tesla, if it were to

0:23:58.000 --> 0:24:01.320
<v Speaker 1>merge with XAI, would be all SARTs of lawsuits that

0:24:01.359 --> 0:24:03.200
<v Speaker 1>you don't have when it's all private companies.

0:24:03.880 --> 0:24:07.080
<v Speaker 2>That's true. Well, I guess it would make more sense

0:24:07.119 --> 0:24:09.399
<v Speaker 2>with SpaceX since they both make things that go fast.

0:24:09.520 --> 0:24:12.240
<v Speaker 2>But that's a gross over simplification.

0:24:12.440 --> 0:24:14.240
<v Speaker 1>There was that time I think all the time that

0:24:14.480 --> 0:24:17.640
<v Speaker 1>Elion must treated that the next Tess the model would

0:24:17.640 --> 0:24:20.399
<v Speaker 1>have rocket posters and be able to fly, And like

0:24:20.680 --> 0:24:22.920
<v Speaker 1>there were articles that were like, how feasible? Is this

0:24:23.560 --> 0:24:30.040
<v Speaker 1>just a public company saying this stuff? And you know

0:24:30.440 --> 0:24:31.920
<v Speaker 1>this is like seven years ago?

0:24:32.280 --> 0:24:34.960
<v Speaker 2>Did he mean it back when it happened things mattered

0:24:35.040 --> 0:24:35.359
<v Speaker 2>back then?

0:24:36.600 --> 0:24:36.719
<v Speaker 1>Well?

0:24:36.800 --> 0:24:39.200
<v Speaker 2>No, no, a little bit seven years ago.

0:24:40.760 --> 0:24:43.520
<v Speaker 1>I actually don't know, might be any number of years ago.

0:24:43.640 --> 0:24:44.639
<v Speaker 1>It's more than three in.

0:24:44.720 --> 0:24:49.640
<v Speaker 2>Less than fifteen pre pandemic. That's why I think about things.

0:25:03.119 --> 0:25:04.919
<v Speaker 1>Should we talk about substitute teachers?

0:25:05.240 --> 0:25:08.879
<v Speaker 2>We absolutely should. Have you seen lately what substituted teachers

0:25:08.920 --> 0:25:09.760
<v Speaker 2>in Maryland are making?

0:25:11.560 --> 0:25:12.520
<v Speaker 1>Seven million dollar.

0:25:14.160 --> 0:25:16.359
<v Speaker 2>Louise? What are we doing?

0:25:16.760 --> 0:25:19.440
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, So there's a story about like a Maryland state

0:25:19.480 --> 0:25:22.040
<v Speaker 1>audit of like the Prince George's County school system that

0:25:22.160 --> 0:25:28.000
<v Speaker 1>found various administrative errors, sloppiness, And the one that I

0:25:28.200 --> 0:25:31.600
<v Speaker 1>was drawn to is that a substitute teacher taught for

0:25:31.680 --> 0:25:35.480
<v Speaker 1>like three days, and they entered this teacher's information into

0:25:35.520 --> 0:25:38.040
<v Speaker 1>the system to some them like a you know, check

0:25:38.119 --> 0:25:40.560
<v Speaker 1>for their few days of work. And they put the

0:25:40.640 --> 0:25:44.280
<v Speaker 1>teacher's ID number into the hours worked field, and the

0:25:44.400 --> 0:25:46.240
<v Speaker 1>ID number had more digits than you want in the

0:25:46.280 --> 0:25:48.280
<v Speaker 1>hours work field. And so they sent the person a

0:25:48.400 --> 0:25:52.159
<v Speaker 1>check for seven million dollars. And they noticed that fifty

0:25:52.280 --> 0:25:56.639
<v Speaker 1>days later and asked for it back, and the teacher

0:25:56.680 --> 0:25:59.920
<v Speaker 1>gave it back. And I just like to do it.

0:26:00.040 --> 0:26:04.000
<v Speaker 1>Imagine what this person did. You've seen this person on

0:26:04.240 --> 0:26:06.879
<v Speaker 1>the gender of the teacher. I imagine what the teacher

0:26:07.000 --> 0:26:09.840
<v Speaker 1>did in those fifty days, and so do my readers.

0:26:10.240 --> 0:26:12.960
<v Speaker 1>There's a lot of emails about this. Most of them

0:26:13.480 --> 0:26:15.760
<v Speaker 1>were to the effect of, you take that money, you

0:26:15.840 --> 0:26:18.560
<v Speaker 1>put it in a money market fund. Fifty days later,

0:26:18.640 --> 0:26:20.640
<v Speaker 1>when they ask for the money back, you give it back,

0:26:21.359 --> 0:26:24.960
<v Speaker 1>and you keep the thirty to fifty thousand dollars spending

0:26:25.000 --> 0:26:28.000
<v Speaker 1>exactly how you count the tens of thousand dollars of

0:26:28.080 --> 0:26:31.080
<v Speaker 1>interest is yours to keep. You're briefly the owner of

0:26:31.119 --> 0:26:33.439
<v Speaker 1>seven million dollars. But you you know, you can collect

0:26:33.480 --> 0:26:35.920
<v Speaker 1>interest on seven million dollars, and it's a meaningful amount

0:26:35.920 --> 0:26:36.160
<v Speaker 1>of money.

0:26:36.240 --> 0:26:37.600
<v Speaker 2>Absolutely, that's like.

0:26:37.640 --> 0:26:40.240
<v Speaker 1>The most reasonable thing that you can do with it.

0:26:40.480 --> 0:26:42.040
<v Speaker 1>The other thing that someone sent me was like, you

0:26:42.080 --> 0:26:43.760
<v Speaker 1>should go to a trading firm. This is someone who

0:26:43.800 --> 0:26:46.399
<v Speaker 1>works like a trading firm. He's like, you should go

0:26:46.440 --> 0:26:48.800
<v Speaker 1>to like an insurance company or trading firm and buy

0:26:49.000 --> 0:26:51.120
<v Speaker 1>insurance on this. You should be like, I will give

0:26:51.160 --> 0:26:53.200
<v Speaker 1>you this person's had like three and a half million dollars,

0:26:53.600 --> 0:26:55.720
<v Speaker 1>three and a half million dollars, and if they come

0:26:55.960 --> 0:26:57.920
<v Speaker 1>to me for the money back, you give them seven

0:26:57.960 --> 0:27:00.119
<v Speaker 1>million dollars, and if they don't, you keep the three

0:27:00.119 --> 0:27:01.879
<v Speaker 1>and a half million dollars. So you're paying an insurance

0:27:01.960 --> 0:27:03.240
<v Speaker 1>rooom for. Are they going to ask you for the

0:27:03.280 --> 0:27:05.880
<v Speaker 1>money back? Now? I don't think any trading firm would

0:27:05.880 --> 0:27:08.640
<v Speaker 1>do that at fifty percent odds, But you could give

0:27:08.640 --> 0:27:12.359
<v Speaker 1>them like six point eight million dollars and someone might

0:27:12.400 --> 0:27:14.160
<v Speaker 1>take that trade and then you keep the two hundred thousand.

0:27:14.200 --> 0:27:16.159
<v Speaker 1>You know, the trade you can do.

0:27:16.359 --> 0:27:19.399
<v Speaker 2>Maybe I would love to know what this person actually did,

0:27:19.480 --> 0:27:21.840
<v Speaker 2>though I don't think that we can get this person

0:27:21.920 --> 0:27:22.879
<v Speaker 2>on the podcast out.

0:27:22.760 --> 0:27:25.600
<v Speaker 1>On their checking account for Are you sure? No, that's sure?

0:27:26.040 --> 0:27:28.280
<v Speaker 2>I mean, this is the whole point of what we're reading.

0:27:28.320 --> 0:27:31.280
<v Speaker 2>But you are magic seven million dollars, You're just an

0:27:31.359 --> 0:27:33.560
<v Speaker 2>ordinary person. You just leave it in your checking account.

0:27:34.080 --> 0:27:38.119
<v Speaker 1>You weren't magic, you were mistakenly paid it. Yeah, Now

0:27:38.520 --> 0:27:40.320
<v Speaker 1>there's a range of things you can do. You can

0:27:40.440 --> 0:27:42.760
<v Speaker 1>call the school system and be like, you mistakenly paid

0:27:42.800 --> 0:27:46.200
<v Speaker 1>me seven million dollars. Teachers seems not to have done that.

0:27:46.800 --> 0:27:48.720
<v Speaker 1>There's a number where I would do that. You know,

0:27:48.880 --> 0:27:51.760
<v Speaker 1>if I was accidentally paid, you know, an extra two

0:27:51.880 --> 0:27:54.480
<v Speaker 1>hundred dollars, I would probably call. Really I don't know,

0:27:54.680 --> 0:27:55.439
<v Speaker 1>I mean, but.

0:27:55.480 --> 0:27:57.040
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, I don't think I would have noticed.

0:27:58.359 --> 0:28:00.439
<v Speaker 1>If I were accidentally paid an amount that I noticed,

0:28:00.800 --> 0:28:03.760
<v Speaker 1>but that would not materially change my life, like really

0:28:03.800 --> 0:28:05.880
<v Speaker 1>materially change my life. I would probably call and be like, hey,

0:28:06.160 --> 0:28:08.840
<v Speaker 1>I'm a nice person, let's sort this error out. But

0:28:08.960 --> 0:28:11.159
<v Speaker 1>it's not really does like, let's see where.

0:28:11.040 --> 0:28:13.639
<v Speaker 2>This goes, right, See, I'm the exact opposite of you.

0:28:13.880 --> 0:28:15.920
<v Speaker 2>If it was it's hard to do this without talking

0:28:15.960 --> 0:28:19.240
<v Speaker 2>about numbers. If it was seven million dollars, I would

0:28:19.240 --> 0:28:21.720
<v Speaker 2>probably call because that is so egregiously an error. There's

0:28:21.760 --> 0:28:23.600
<v Speaker 2>like no way I'm going to be able to keep this.

0:28:23.760 --> 0:28:26.960
<v Speaker 2>If it was far less than that, like not enough

0:28:27.000 --> 0:28:29.239
<v Speaker 2>to change my life, but enough that I could might.

0:28:31.359 --> 0:28:36.359
<v Speaker 2>If it was enough to buy worth a young Greenborough horse,

0:28:36.640 --> 0:28:38.880
<v Speaker 2>I would probably not call about it.

0:28:39.520 --> 0:28:42.680
<v Speaker 1>But like that, when you spend it on the horse,

0:28:43.600 --> 0:28:45.040
<v Speaker 1>you would like the next day go out and buy

0:28:45.080 --> 0:28:45.440
<v Speaker 1>a horse.

0:28:45.760 --> 0:28:47.760
<v Speaker 2>Well, I'd have to find the horse first, you know, Okay,

0:28:49.240 --> 0:28:50.320
<v Speaker 2>like while you're.

0:28:50.280 --> 0:28:52.280
<v Speaker 1>Test riding, there's a good chance that the last for

0:28:52.320 --> 0:28:52.840
<v Speaker 1>the money bag.

0:28:53.360 --> 0:28:57.080
<v Speaker 2>That's true. That's true. I wouldn't spend it immediately, but

0:28:57.120 --> 0:28:58.200
<v Speaker 2>I would start the process.

0:28:58.480 --> 0:29:01.320
<v Speaker 1>The choice is not like you call and say, hey,

0:29:01.360 --> 0:29:03.760
<v Speaker 1>there's an error here, or you keep the money forever. Yeah,

0:29:03.880 --> 0:29:06.080
<v Speaker 1>Like there's the vast middle ground if you don't call

0:29:06.200 --> 0:29:08.360
<v Speaker 1>and you worry, right, which is what this person did, right,

0:29:08.520 --> 0:29:09.640
<v Speaker 1>that's not keeping that money.

0:29:09.680 --> 0:29:13.000
<v Speaker 2>I probably would not spend it immediately, like in any situation,

0:29:13.160 --> 0:29:15.720
<v Speaker 2>but I'm not really an impulse sure.

0:29:15.960 --> 0:29:19.040
<v Speaker 1>My favorite reader email about this, yeah, came from someone

0:29:19.040 --> 0:29:22.360
<v Speaker 1>who worked at a bank and got overpaid. He was

0:29:22.480 --> 0:29:24.920
<v Speaker 1>mistakenly paid like a bonus or something, and it was

0:29:24.960 --> 0:29:26.840
<v Speaker 1>like not seven million dollars, but it was. I think

0:29:26.880 --> 0:29:28.120
<v Speaker 1>he was like a young person. I don't know. It

0:29:28.240 --> 0:29:31.800
<v Speaker 1>was tens of thousands of dollars, and he says he

0:29:31.920 --> 0:29:36.360
<v Speaker 1>consulted an employment layer and learned about the time period

0:29:36.400 --> 0:29:39.520
<v Speaker 1>for letches, which is a legal concept of like basically,

0:29:40.360 --> 0:29:42.240
<v Speaker 1>how long do you have to wait before you don't

0:29:42.240 --> 0:29:43.720
<v Speaker 1>have to worry about anymore. It's like a statute of

0:29:43.720 --> 0:29:46.520
<v Speaker 1>limitations for stuff like this. And the lawyer told him

0:29:46.560 --> 0:29:52.400
<v Speaker 1>it was six years. Wow. He waited out the six years.

0:29:52.560 --> 0:29:52.840
<v Speaker 2>Wow.

0:29:53.240 --> 0:29:55.360
<v Speaker 1>And he's like at the end, I threw a claim

0:29:55.400 --> 0:29:58.720
<v Speaker 1>has lapsed party. That's awesome because they didn't ask.

0:29:58.600 --> 0:30:01.760
<v Speaker 2>The money bag man. That is a great email. But

0:30:01.920 --> 0:30:02.560
<v Speaker 2>like I just.

0:30:02.640 --> 0:30:07.040
<v Speaker 1>Imagine like the mindset of like this money has been

0:30:07.080 --> 0:30:11.080
<v Speaker 1>mistakenly deposited my account. Let me ask a lawyer, like

0:30:11.200 --> 0:30:15.800
<v Speaker 1>I reade one's about the city group error and one, yeah,

0:30:15.840 --> 0:30:17.960
<v Speaker 1>I know when they send the nine hundred million dollars

0:30:17.960 --> 0:30:19.680
<v Speaker 1>to Hedgehunds that were mad at them, and the Hedgehts

0:30:19.760 --> 0:30:22.440
<v Speaker 1>kept it. I wrote about the Hedgehunds consulting finders keepers

0:30:22.520 --> 0:30:24.520
<v Speaker 1>lawyers because like they did actually like bring a claim,

0:30:24.600 --> 0:30:26.440
<v Speaker 1>being like no, we're allowed to keep the money. But

0:30:26.560 --> 0:30:28.880
<v Speaker 1>like there are finders keepers layers out there in the world,

0:30:28.880 --> 0:30:31.040
<v Speaker 1>and you can consult one and be like you have

0:30:31.240 --> 0:30:33.239
<v Speaker 1>six years. If you get through six years, you can

0:30:33.320 --> 0:30:34.640
<v Speaker 1>keep the money. And he did.

0:30:34.920 --> 0:30:36.640
<v Speaker 2>I would love to have gone to that party.

0:30:36.800 --> 0:30:38.160
<v Speaker 1>That sounds like a party.

0:30:38.240 --> 0:30:40.160
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, that's a good theme. I love a theme. That's

0:30:40.200 --> 0:30:41.760
<v Speaker 2>a good one. It's a good man.

0:30:42.400 --> 0:30:47.360
<v Speaker 1>It's not I got a mistaken bonus. It's six years later.

0:30:47.400 --> 0:30:49.680
<v Speaker 1>They haven't asked for my mistaken bonus back. It's so good.

0:30:50.320 --> 0:30:52.440
<v Speaker 2>I wonder if you told the bank, oh, it's not.

0:30:52.920 --> 0:30:55.200
<v Speaker 1>That's a good point. Probably not, but now they know

0:30:55.480 --> 0:30:56.960
<v Speaker 1>I should say this is not legally pace.

0:30:56.960 --> 0:30:58.600
<v Speaker 2>I have no idea what the city group.

0:31:01.280 --> 0:31:03.240
<v Speaker 1>I know that would be too perfect. Hi. Yeah, yeah,

0:31:04.240 --> 0:31:10.320
<v Speaker 1>siting here. Check. And that was the Money Stuff Podcast.

0:31:10.520 --> 0:31:12.440
<v Speaker 2>I'm Matt Levian and I'm Katie Greifeld.

0:31:12.880 --> 0:31:14.920
<v Speaker 1>You can find my work by subscribing to the Money

0:31:14.960 --> 0:31:16.000
<v Speaker 1>Stuff newsletter.

0:31:15.720 --> 0:31:18.040
<v Speaker 2>On Bloomberg dot com, and you can find me on

0:31:18.160 --> 0:31:21.640
<v Speaker 2>Bloomberg TV every day on Open Interest between nine to

0:31:21.720 --> 0:31:22.760
<v Speaker 2>eleven am Eastern.

0:31:23.240 --> 0:31:24.959
<v Speaker 1>We'd love to hear from you. You can send an

0:31:25.000 --> 0:31:28.120
<v Speaker 1>email to money Pod at Bloomberg dot net, ask us

0:31:28.160 --> 0:31:29.640
<v Speaker 1>a question and we might answer it on air.

0:31:29.840 --> 0:31:32.000
<v Speaker 2>You can also subscribe to our show wherever you're listening

0:31:32.080 --> 0:31:34.080
<v Speaker 2>right now and leave us a review it helps more

0:31:34.120 --> 0:31:34.960
<v Speaker 2>people find the show.

0:31:35.720 --> 0:31:38.480
<v Speaker 1>The Money Stuff Podcast is produced by Anna Maserakus and

0:31:38.600 --> 0:31:39.680
<v Speaker 1>Moses onam Ar.

0:31:39.720 --> 0:31:42.040
<v Speaker 2>Thea music was composed by Blake Maples.

0:31:41.960 --> 0:31:44.560
<v Speaker 1>Brandon, Francis Nudimens, our executive producer.

0:31:44.400 --> 0:31:46.520
<v Speaker 2>And Stage Bauman is Bloomberg's head of podcasts.

0:31:46.880 --> 0:31:49.200
<v Speaker 1>Thanks for listening to The Money Stuff Podcast. We'll be

0:31:49.280 --> 0:31:50.720
<v Speaker 1>back next week with more stuff