WEBVTT - Fed Minutes Signal Officials on Hold Until Inflation Improves

0:00:02.520 --> 0:00:07.000
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg Audio Studios, Podcasts, radio news.

0:00:08.640 --> 0:00:12.680
<v Speaker 2>This is Bloomberg Business Week, insight from the reporters and

0:00:12.800 --> 0:00:16.800
<v Speaker 2>editors that bring you America's most trusted business magazine, plus

0:00:17.000 --> 0:00:20.799
<v Speaker 2>global business, finance and tech news. The Bloomberg Business Week

0:00:20.840 --> 0:00:26.240
<v Speaker 2>Podcast with Carol Masser and Tim Stenevek on Bloomberg Radio.

0:00:26.840 --> 0:00:29.800
<v Speaker 3>And a very good afternoon everybody live on radio, TV, YouTube,

0:00:29.800 --> 0:00:32.520
<v Speaker 3>Bloomberg Originals. This is Bloomberg Business Week for this. Yeah,

0:00:32.560 --> 0:00:35.600
<v Speaker 3>it's a FED Wednesday. It is Wednesday, February nineteenth, Carol

0:00:35.640 --> 0:00:37.800
<v Speaker 3>Master Tim Stenevik. In just a moment, we're going to

0:00:37.840 --> 0:00:40.240
<v Speaker 3>get the FED minutes from the meeting, the first meeting

0:00:40.280 --> 0:00:42.400
<v Speaker 3>of twenty twenty five. It happened three weeks ago. We're

0:00:42.440 --> 0:00:45.160
<v Speaker 3>going to head to Washington, DC. In just a moment, Tim.

0:00:44.920 --> 0:00:46.920
<v Speaker 4>Yeah, we're also going inside the world of the world's

0:00:46.960 --> 0:00:48.640
<v Speaker 4>biggest online dollar store.

0:00:48.680 --> 0:00:50.319
<v Speaker 3>Off to DC we go, and that's where we find

0:00:50.360 --> 0:00:54.040
<v Speaker 3>Bloomberg News International Economics and Policy correspondent Michael McKee.

0:00:54.080 --> 0:00:56.840
<v Speaker 5>Mike, we've got some news from the minutes today as

0:00:56.840 --> 0:00:59.280
<v Speaker 5>there was a lot of discussion apparently at the last

0:00:59.320 --> 0:01:03.920
<v Speaker 5>meeting about TRAID, tariffs, banks and the balance sheet. Whilst

0:01:03.920 --> 0:01:07.399
<v Speaker 5>officials saw a strong economy with a solid labor market

0:01:07.520 --> 0:01:11.399
<v Speaker 5>and declining, if still too high inflation. They spent a

0:01:11.400 --> 0:01:15.200
<v Speaker 5>lot of time talking about potential policy changes and financial

0:01:15.240 --> 0:01:19.319
<v Speaker 5>market supervision. A number of participants suggested the recent rise

0:01:19.360 --> 0:01:23.959
<v Speaker 5>in monthly inflation was likely due to seasonal factors, noting

0:01:24.160 --> 0:01:28.080
<v Speaker 5>substantial progress before that, but potential changes to trade and

0:01:28.280 --> 0:01:32.960
<v Speaker 5>immigration policy from the new administration had the quote potential

0:01:33.000 --> 0:01:38.720
<v Speaker 5>to hinder the disinflation process. One concerning note business contacts

0:01:38.760 --> 0:01:42.000
<v Speaker 5>in a number of districts, indicated that firms would attempt

0:01:42.080 --> 0:01:46.440
<v Speaker 5>to pass on to consumers higher input costs arising from

0:01:46.520 --> 0:01:50.880
<v Speaker 5>potential tariffs. Many said companies were reporting substantial optimism about

0:01:50.880 --> 0:01:55.640
<v Speaker 5>the economic outlook given potential easing of regulations and tax cuts,

0:01:56.000 --> 0:02:01.040
<v Speaker 5>but some participants reported increased uncertainty regarding putential changes in

0:02:01.120 --> 0:02:05.960
<v Speaker 5>federal government policies. Altogether, FED officials generally pointing to upside

0:02:06.040 --> 0:02:11.480
<v Speaker 5>risks to inflation from tariffs and immigration policies, geopolitical threats,

0:02:11.639 --> 0:02:15.560
<v Speaker 5>and stronger than expected consumer spending. They worried it might

0:02:15.600 --> 0:02:19.960
<v Speaker 5>be hard to distinguish persistent changes in inflation from temporary

0:02:20.000 --> 0:02:23.920
<v Speaker 5>ones caused by policy changes. There was also discussion of

0:02:23.960 --> 0:02:28.920
<v Speaker 5>financial market vulnerabilities, including bank's reliance on reciprocal deposits, the

0:02:29.200 --> 0:02:32.800
<v Speaker 5>risk of unrealized losses at banks and non bank institutions

0:02:33.000 --> 0:02:38.320
<v Speaker 5>from any potential rise in long term interest rates, asset valuations,

0:02:38.360 --> 0:02:43.120
<v Speaker 5>and commercial real estate exposures. Several commented on concerns that

0:02:43.440 --> 0:02:47.799
<v Speaker 5>primary dealers didn't have enough intermediation capacity, and the degree

0:02:47.800 --> 0:02:52.280
<v Speaker 5>of levered presitions in the markets was concerning. Finally, on

0:02:52.400 --> 0:02:57.280
<v Speaker 5>the balance sheet, many participants suggested structuring future purposes as

0:02:57.280 --> 0:02:59.600
<v Speaker 5>they run off the balance sheet should be done in

0:02:59.639 --> 0:03:02.480
<v Speaker 5>a way that move the maturity composition of the FEDS

0:03:02.600 --> 0:03:07.000
<v Speaker 5>portfolio closer to that of the outstanding stock of treasury debt,

0:03:07.520 --> 0:03:11.120
<v Speaker 5>and various participants that's a new adverb for the FED

0:03:11.560 --> 0:03:15.640
<v Speaker 5>suggested it might be appropriate to consider pausing or slowing

0:03:16.040 --> 0:03:21.000
<v Speaker 5>balance sheet runoff until the debt ceiling is resolved. They

0:03:21.080 --> 0:03:24.240
<v Speaker 5>obviously made no decision on that and did not make

0:03:24.280 --> 0:03:27.440
<v Speaker 5>any decisions on bank supervision, but it does show they

0:03:27.480 --> 0:03:31.200
<v Speaker 5>were worried about more than just inflation at this last meeting.

0:03:31.560 --> 0:03:33.239
<v Speaker 3>All right, Mike, I feel like that there is definitely

0:03:33.240 --> 0:03:35.840
<v Speaker 3>a follow up to that various participants point that you made.

0:03:35.880 --> 0:03:38.120
<v Speaker 3>But let me just quick check on the markets. Equity

0:03:38.120 --> 0:03:40.160
<v Speaker 3>markets to S and P is up about four points.

0:03:40.320 --> 0:03:43.080
<v Speaker 3>Nazek one hundreds down is up about six points, so

0:03:43.560 --> 0:03:46.200
<v Speaker 3>a little bit of a more positive tilt, but call

0:03:46.240 --> 0:03:48.600
<v Speaker 3>it really slightly more importantly, let's get to the US

0:03:48.600 --> 0:03:51.280
<v Speaker 3>Treasury trade. We had a four to fifty five read

0:03:51.400 --> 0:03:54.880
<v Speaker 3>on the ten year. It's at four fifty four. The

0:03:55.280 --> 0:03:56.800
<v Speaker 3>five year, if I look at it was at four

0:03:56.880 --> 0:03:58.760
<v Speaker 3>thirty eight. That's where we find it short end of

0:03:58.760 --> 0:04:01.200
<v Speaker 3>the yell curve, most sensitive to what the FED may

0:04:01.360 --> 0:04:04.920
<v Speaker 3>say or do. That's exactly at where it was prior

0:04:05.160 --> 0:04:06.960
<v Speaker 3>to the FED minutes, and that's with the yield of

0:04:07.000 --> 0:04:10.480
<v Speaker 3>four to twenty eight. Hey, Mike, anything in here that

0:04:10.720 --> 0:04:14.160
<v Speaker 3>beyond the various participants or that included that would make

0:04:14.760 --> 0:04:19.039
<v Speaker 3>investors traders think differently about what the FED might do

0:04:19.920 --> 0:04:22.039
<v Speaker 3>differently from what we got at that FED meeting.

0:04:23.560 --> 0:04:26.400
<v Speaker 5>Not necessarily a monetary policy, and many of the FED

0:04:26.440 --> 0:04:29.839
<v Speaker 5>officials who've spoken since the meeting have talked about risks

0:04:29.839 --> 0:04:32.640
<v Speaker 5>from trade policy and immigration and the fact that they

0:04:32.680 --> 0:04:35.799
<v Speaker 5>don't know what they can be and they can't quantify

0:04:35.839 --> 0:04:39.840
<v Speaker 5>them at this point. The Bank supervision stuff was interesting

0:04:39.880 --> 0:04:41.760
<v Speaker 5>because there's been a lot of talk about how strong

0:04:41.800 --> 0:04:43.880
<v Speaker 5>the banks are and there's not a lot of concern

0:04:43.920 --> 0:04:46.960
<v Speaker 5>about that. At the press conference, Jay Powell talked about

0:04:47.000 --> 0:04:52.320
<v Speaker 5>how SVP was an outlier when that bank failed, but

0:04:52.640 --> 0:04:56.120
<v Speaker 5>apparently there's more concern about that. There's also been questions

0:04:56.160 --> 0:04:58.320
<v Speaker 5>about whether the FED would change its rules on the

0:04:58.360 --> 0:05:03.120
<v Speaker 5>supplementary leverage ratio. Obviously there are concerns about whether dealers

0:05:03.240 --> 0:05:07.080
<v Speaker 5>have intermediation capacity. And then, of course, finally, the balance

0:05:07.080 --> 0:05:10.560
<v Speaker 5>sheet stuff is really interesting. It's something that bond traders

0:05:10.680 --> 0:05:13.239
<v Speaker 5>and bond analysts are going to have to follow closely

0:05:13.279 --> 0:05:15.880
<v Speaker 5>because it's possible, I suppose at the next meeting, if

0:05:15.920 --> 0:05:18.920
<v Speaker 5>we don't get progress on a debt ceiling from the

0:05:19.120 --> 0:05:23.640
<v Speaker 5>administration and Congress, they might want to consider pausing the

0:05:23.720 --> 0:05:26.400
<v Speaker 5>runoff of the balance sheet until that happens.

0:05:26.720 --> 0:05:30.200
<v Speaker 4>Is it rare to get something Mike in Fed minutes

0:05:30.279 --> 0:05:35.000
<v Speaker 4>that is so not necessarily targeted, but something that specifically

0:05:35.040 --> 0:05:38.320
<v Speaker 4>calls out something that could be happening in Washington that

0:05:38.360 --> 0:05:39.359
<v Speaker 4>Congress has control of.

0:05:41.080 --> 0:05:44.240
<v Speaker 5>We don't see a lot of major policy changes from

0:05:44.279 --> 0:05:47.560
<v Speaker 5>administration to administration that would affect the economy in the

0:05:47.600 --> 0:05:52.279
<v Speaker 5>way that tariffs and immigration policy might. Tax cuts as well.

0:05:53.200 --> 0:05:56.480
<v Speaker 5>So it is unusual, but it is not an unusual

0:05:56.560 --> 0:06:00.800
<v Speaker 5>factor of Fed thinking over the last or five months,

0:06:00.839 --> 0:06:03.320
<v Speaker 5>because they've been trying to parse out what might happen

0:06:03.520 --> 0:06:06.080
<v Speaker 5>and how that might affect the economy, and we still

0:06:06.080 --> 0:06:08.880
<v Speaker 5>don't have very many details about all that. I think

0:06:09.160 --> 0:06:12.800
<v Speaker 5>we've got six different tariff announcements but only one in place,

0:06:12.839 --> 0:06:15.880
<v Speaker 5>the rest postponed for a few weeks until this or

0:06:16.000 --> 0:06:18.839
<v Speaker 5>that happens. So they really don't have an idea of

0:06:18.920 --> 0:06:21.120
<v Speaker 5>what's going to happen, but they are putting it in

0:06:21.160 --> 0:06:22.760
<v Speaker 5>the upside risks category.

0:06:22.880 --> 0:06:25.760
<v Speaker 6>Hey, one last question, Mike, So if j.

0:06:25.920 --> 0:06:28.880
<v Speaker 3>Powell was holding a press conference today off of these minutes,

0:06:28.880 --> 0:06:30.320
<v Speaker 3>what would you ask him.

0:06:30.720 --> 0:06:34.680
<v Speaker 5>Yeah, Well, since everybody else before me would probably ask

0:06:34.760 --> 0:06:37.560
<v Speaker 5>about upside risks to inflation, I'd be interested to know

0:06:37.640 --> 0:06:40.880
<v Speaker 5>more about the balance sheet and what they're really thinking there. Obviously,

0:06:40.920 --> 0:06:44.039
<v Speaker 5>the Fed when it lets them as securities roll off

0:06:44.440 --> 0:06:47.320
<v Speaker 5>up to a limit of thirty trillion thirty billion rather

0:06:47.360 --> 0:06:50.760
<v Speaker 5>a month, then the rest of the rolling off money

0:06:50.800 --> 0:06:52.920
<v Speaker 5>goes back into the treasury. And there's been a lot

0:06:52.960 --> 0:06:55.599
<v Speaker 5>of talk about the maturity curve for the treasury because

0:06:55.640 --> 0:06:59.039
<v Speaker 5>the Biden administration bought a lot of short term bills,

0:06:59.720 --> 0:07:04.000
<v Speaker 5>short term bonds, and now we're looking at longer term

0:07:04.440 --> 0:07:07.080
<v Speaker 5>perhaps losses because interest rates are going to go higher.

0:07:07.120 --> 0:07:09.080
<v Speaker 5>But the Fed is now talking about maybe we want

0:07:09.080 --> 0:07:12.360
<v Speaker 5>to go that direction. So a very interesting question ahead

0:07:12.640 --> 0:07:13.560
<v Speaker 5>for the bond market.

0:07:13.640 --> 0:07:16.680
<v Speaker 3>All right, Bloomberg News International Economics and Policy correspondent Michael

0:07:16.760 --> 0:07:20.480
<v Speaker 3>McKee out there in Washington, DC. All right, let's get

0:07:20.480 --> 0:07:22.880
<v Speaker 3>to any market reaction when it comes to the US

0:07:23.000 --> 0:07:24.440
<v Speaker 3>rates trade. And we've got a great guest for that.

0:07:24.640 --> 0:07:27.800
<v Speaker 4>Well, let's bring in Bloomberg Intelligence Chief US interest rates strategist,

0:07:27.840 --> 0:07:31.560
<v Speaker 4>Ira Jersey. He's out there at Bloomberg Intelligence headquarters in Princeton,

0:07:31.640 --> 0:07:35.160
<v Speaker 4>New Jersey. Ira, why the lack of reaction to this

0:07:35.760 --> 0:07:38.200
<v Speaker 4>to the news in the minutes from the Federal Reserve.

0:07:38.720 --> 0:07:41.200
<v Speaker 7>Because there's a lot of interesting details but nothing new.

0:07:41.880 --> 0:07:43.520
<v Speaker 7>You know. One of the one of the issues that

0:07:43.560 --> 0:07:47.640
<v Speaker 7>we get is with the chairs press conference after the

0:07:47.680 --> 0:07:50.600
<v Speaker 7>meeting is we know, you know ninety plus percent of

0:07:50.640 --> 0:07:52.600
<v Speaker 7>what's likely to be in the minute. So it's really

0:07:52.920 --> 0:07:55.120
<v Speaker 7>around the edges that you look for things. So it

0:07:55.240 --> 0:07:57.640
<v Speaker 7>is those adverbs that Mike was just talking about, So

0:07:57.680 --> 0:07:59.720
<v Speaker 7>you look at you know, were there many members that

0:07:59.800 --> 0:08:02.480
<v Speaker 7>thought something that was different than maybe what was expressed

0:08:02.480 --> 0:08:04.880
<v Speaker 7>by Jay Powell or was it just a couple right,

0:08:04.920 --> 0:08:07.800
<v Speaker 7>So that's a kind of the nuance that we get

0:08:07.840 --> 0:08:10.320
<v Speaker 7>out of the out of the minutes, you know, I'm

0:08:10.360 --> 0:08:12.520
<v Speaker 7>focusing on the minutes here looking at some of the

0:08:12.520 --> 0:08:16.400
<v Speaker 7>statements done by the SOMA portfolio manager, who's that has

0:08:16.440 --> 0:08:19.360
<v Speaker 7>to do with quantitative tightening and what they might end

0:08:19.440 --> 0:08:22.040
<v Speaker 7>up doing with the balance sheet. So there is some

0:08:22.160 --> 0:08:25.440
<v Speaker 7>interesting information in there that we didn't have before. And

0:08:25.800 --> 0:08:28.120
<v Speaker 7>obviously the FED is you know, so maybe so a

0:08:28.120 --> 0:08:30.840
<v Speaker 7>long time from stopping QT, but now we're getting a

0:08:30.880 --> 0:08:33.000
<v Speaker 7>hint as to what they might do if they end

0:08:33.080 --> 0:08:35.360
<v Speaker 7>their their asset runof quantitative tightening.

0:08:35.400 --> 0:08:37.440
<v Speaker 3>Well, are you, like Mike, that you would want if

0:08:37.480 --> 0:08:39.559
<v Speaker 3>you were posing a question to j Powell if there

0:08:39.600 --> 0:08:41.760
<v Speaker 3>was a press conference after the FED minutes like there

0:08:41.800 --> 0:08:44.560
<v Speaker 3>is after the FED decision, would you ask about the

0:08:44.559 --> 0:08:46.280
<v Speaker 3>balance sheet? Is there something else you'd want to know?

0:08:46.320 --> 0:08:47.959
<v Speaker 3>Based on the headlines we've gotten.

0:08:49.280 --> 0:08:51.760
<v Speaker 7>Probably mostly about the balance sheet at this point, because

0:08:51.800 --> 0:08:54.479
<v Speaker 7>we know and some of the interesting statements in there,

0:08:54.520 --> 0:08:58.160
<v Speaker 7>you know, did follow up is as you were talking

0:08:58.160 --> 0:08:59.960
<v Speaker 7>about a moment ago. There have been a lot of

0:09:00.040 --> 0:09:02.160
<v Speaker 7>speakers since the meeting, right so, and most of those

0:09:02.200 --> 0:09:04.400
<v Speaker 7>speakers have said we can be patient, we can wait,

0:09:05.000 --> 0:09:07.880
<v Speaker 7>you know, there's risks of the upside. There was one

0:09:07.960 --> 0:09:11.120
<v Speaker 7>interesting headline that came over the terminal, and I have

0:09:11.160 --> 0:09:13.000
<v Speaker 7>not yet read it in the minutes. Obviously, the minutes

0:09:13.000 --> 0:09:16.160
<v Speaker 7>were like thirty pages long, so it's taken a little while.

0:09:16.520 --> 0:09:20.320
<v Speaker 7>But they did say, like, you know, until inflation starts

0:09:20.360 --> 0:09:22.920
<v Speaker 7>to move more toward their goal, they can be patient

0:09:22.920 --> 0:09:26.559
<v Speaker 7>and wait. So I think, while not exactly new, I

0:09:26.600 --> 0:09:29.760
<v Speaker 7>think that that was just a confirmation that members of

0:09:29.760 --> 0:09:32.600
<v Speaker 7>the feder Reserve are happy with where rates are given

0:09:32.720 --> 0:09:36.640
<v Speaker 7>the overall economic environment that we've been seeing in a

0:09:36.640 --> 0:09:38.720
<v Speaker 7>lot of the data, particularly that inflation data.

0:09:38.800 --> 0:09:42.600
<v Speaker 4>If we do indeed see policies from the Trump administration

0:09:42.640 --> 0:09:47.440
<v Speaker 4>that are indeed inflationary tariffs, immigration policy, is it a

0:09:47.440 --> 0:09:50.199
<v Speaker 4>realistic thing to say I read that the next move

0:09:50.200 --> 0:09:51.600
<v Speaker 4>from the Fed could be a move higher.

0:09:53.320 --> 0:09:56.040
<v Speaker 7>Well, I think that depends in what everything else is

0:09:56.040 --> 0:09:58.679
<v Speaker 7>doing in the economy, right, because the Federal Reserve, unlike

0:09:58.760 --> 0:10:01.480
<v Speaker 7>most other central banks, have their dual mandate, right so,

0:10:01.520 --> 0:10:03.640
<v Speaker 7>I think there's two things. Is one they have been

0:10:03.679 --> 0:10:05.720
<v Speaker 7>harping and some members have been harping on the on

0:10:05.760 --> 0:10:09.280
<v Speaker 7>the idea that they're not near the neutral rate, that

0:10:09.400 --> 0:10:11.240
<v Speaker 7>for some reason, a lot of members of the Federal

0:10:11.240 --> 0:10:13.440
<v Speaker 7>Reserve think that the neutral rate is probably closer to

0:10:13.720 --> 0:10:16.000
<v Speaker 7>two and a half or three percent instead of four percent.

0:10:16.280 --> 0:10:18.440
<v Speaker 7>I actually think it's closer to three and three quarters

0:10:18.480 --> 0:10:20.679
<v Speaker 7>or four So I think we're probably pretty close to that.

0:10:21.040 --> 0:10:23.080
<v Speaker 7>But there's a difference of opinion, right because it's not

0:10:23.120 --> 0:10:25.640
<v Speaker 7>something you can observe ex ante. You have to wait

0:10:25.720 --> 0:10:27.840
<v Speaker 7>until events happen, and you only know if you were

0:10:27.840 --> 0:10:30.200
<v Speaker 7>at the neutral rate, you know, at some time in

0:10:30.240 --> 0:10:33.719
<v Speaker 7>the past when you look at history. So I do

0:10:33.760 --> 0:10:37.679
<v Speaker 7>think that the Fed itself is going to have to

0:10:37.840 --> 0:10:41.720
<v Speaker 7>think about you know, hey, you know, what does do

0:10:41.840 --> 0:10:45.079
<v Speaker 7>tariffs mean for inflation in the long term and the

0:10:45.120 --> 0:10:48.000
<v Speaker 7>short term? And if inflation does go up and inflation

0:10:48.080 --> 0:10:51.439
<v Speaker 7>expectations rise, and the and the job market is still okay,

0:10:51.480 --> 0:10:53.520
<v Speaker 7>then the Fed will sit on their hands and maybe

0:10:53.520 --> 0:10:56.000
<v Speaker 7>they will hike. But it's more likely that you get

0:10:56.000 --> 0:10:58.440
<v Speaker 7>tariffs and then you also have maybe some job losses,

0:10:58.720 --> 0:11:00.839
<v Speaker 7>and that means that the Fed has decide, hey, are

0:11:00.840 --> 0:11:03.520
<v Speaker 7>we going to ease a little bit to take back

0:11:03.840 --> 0:11:07.240
<v Speaker 7>to ease monetary policy in order to try to support

0:11:07.240 --> 0:11:09.560
<v Speaker 7>the job market, or do we just you know, try

0:11:09.559 --> 0:11:11.760
<v Speaker 7>to push against these Tara fled inflation.

0:11:11.920 --> 0:11:14.559
<v Speaker 3>Hey, just to wrap up, Ira, So you know, as

0:11:14.600 --> 0:11:17.600
<v Speaker 3>your research that you guys that you put out today,

0:11:17.880 --> 0:11:20.480
<v Speaker 3>you say you think there is a non trivial risk

0:11:20.960 --> 0:11:23.640
<v Speaker 3>that the FED may need to increase rates to stema

0:11:23.679 --> 0:11:27.720
<v Speaker 3>climbate inflation expectations market and traders not pricing that in

0:11:27.800 --> 0:11:28.320
<v Speaker 3>yet in your.

0:11:28.280 --> 0:11:32.599
<v Speaker 7>View, Yeah, so the market is not pricing it in.

0:11:32.679 --> 0:11:35.520
<v Speaker 7>There's a very small chance and some options markets that

0:11:35.920 --> 0:11:39.240
<v Speaker 7>the FED reserve might hike one time over the next year.

0:11:39.840 --> 0:11:42.000
<v Speaker 7>I think that's probably too low. Like, it's still not

0:11:42.040 --> 0:11:43.959
<v Speaker 7>our base case. Like our base case is that the

0:11:44.000 --> 0:11:46.840
<v Speaker 7>Fed's on hold for the next twelve months. But I

0:11:46.880 --> 0:11:49.320
<v Speaker 7>think that the market is underpricing the risk that the

0:11:49.360 --> 0:11:50.280
<v Speaker 7>FED might have to hike.

0:11:50.559 --> 0:11:52.520
<v Speaker 3>All right, Gonna leave it there. Hey, listen, Ira, thank

0:11:52.520 --> 0:11:55.320
<v Speaker 3>you so much, so appreciate it reaction to what we saw.

0:11:55.360 --> 0:11:56.120
<v Speaker 6>Of course, Ira.

0:11:56.080 --> 0:11:58.600
<v Speaker 3>Jersey's chief US interest rate strategist. Here at our Bloomberg

0:11:58.640 --> 0:12:01.520
<v Speaker 3>intelligence team out there at the headquarters in Princeton.

0:12:03.000 --> 0:12:06.560
<v Speaker 2>You're listening to the Bloomberg Business Week Podcast. Catch us

0:12:06.640 --> 0:12:10.079
<v Speaker 2>live weekday afternoons from two to five pm Eastern Listen

0:12:10.120 --> 0:12:13.640
<v Speaker 2>on Apple CarPlay and Android Auto with the Bloomberg Business app,

0:12:13.800 --> 0:12:16.439
<v Speaker 2>or watch us live on YouTube.

0:12:16.679 --> 0:12:19.400
<v Speaker 3>We'll head to its homepage and you will be bombarded

0:12:19.800 --> 0:12:23.520
<v Speaker 3>with random items Foux leather car seat covers, frog costumes

0:12:23.520 --> 0:12:24.120
<v Speaker 3>for cats.

0:12:24.120 --> 0:12:24.520
<v Speaker 4>I even know.

0:12:24.800 --> 0:12:25.880
<v Speaker 6>I think Tim just bought some.

0:12:26.720 --> 0:12:28.840
<v Speaker 4>I don't have the cat, but the frog costume.

0:12:28.520 --> 0:12:32.800
<v Speaker 3>Sounds great, knock off handbag supplements, whatever, and also a

0:12:32.880 --> 0:12:36.360
<v Speaker 3>flurry of banners, countdown timers and prize wheels, hawking deals,

0:12:37.160 --> 0:12:39.800
<v Speaker 3>price drops and limited time offers. These are the words

0:12:39.840 --> 0:12:42.800
<v Speaker 3>of our own Spencer so Far. I mean, this is Tim.

0:12:42.960 --> 0:12:44.200
<v Speaker 3>The world of tea moves.

0:12:44.280 --> 0:12:44.439
<v Speaker 8>Yeah.

0:12:44.440 --> 0:12:47.000
<v Speaker 4>In just two years, it's become the world's biggest online

0:12:47.080 --> 0:12:49.960
<v Speaker 4>dollar storys days Bloomberg Big Take. It's a deep dive

0:12:50.000 --> 0:12:52.680
<v Speaker 4>into the company and how it got ensnared in President

0:12:52.720 --> 0:12:55.960
<v Speaker 4>Trump's trade war with the tell. We welcome back Bloomberg

0:12:55.960 --> 0:12:58.280
<v Speaker 4>News Tech and e commerce reporter Spencer Sofer. He joins

0:12:58.320 --> 0:13:01.679
<v Speaker 4>us from our Seattle bureau. Spencer, I feel like I'm

0:13:01.679 --> 0:13:03.360
<v Speaker 4>in the minority because I'm not like a big team

0:13:03.440 --> 0:13:06.800
<v Speaker 4>of person I've never used TIMU. I had no idea

0:13:07.320 --> 0:13:10.000
<v Speaker 4>that the growth of TIMO over the last couple of

0:13:10.040 --> 0:13:13.480
<v Speaker 4>years is a direct result on what happened during Trump's

0:13:13.600 --> 0:13:14.360
<v Speaker 4>first term.

0:13:14.559 --> 0:13:15.280
<v Speaker 6>How did it happen?

0:13:17.200 --> 0:13:19.440
<v Speaker 9>Yes, So during Trump's first term, if you remember, he

0:13:19.480 --> 0:13:24.880
<v Speaker 9>imposed these big tariffs on China in particular, and so

0:13:25.920 --> 0:13:30.320
<v Speaker 9>that basically made this demnimous loophole, which has been a

0:13:30.320 --> 0:13:33.320
<v Speaker 9>thing for you know, for nearly a century now, But

0:13:33.520 --> 0:13:36.280
<v Speaker 9>there's this tariff loophole that lets you ship in individual

0:13:36.360 --> 0:13:39.960
<v Speaker 9>packages from China. As long as something a package is

0:13:39.960 --> 0:13:42.640
<v Speaker 9>worth less than eight hundred dollars, it can come into

0:13:42.720 --> 0:13:45.240
<v Speaker 9>the US for free. So all of a sudden, this

0:13:45.320 --> 0:13:49.920
<v Speaker 9>shipping method is much more attractive as opposed to you know, traditionally,

0:13:49.960 --> 0:13:52.040
<v Speaker 9>if you go to a store, you buy something on Amazon,

0:13:52.440 --> 0:13:56.079
<v Speaker 9>it most likely came in a cargo container into a port,

0:13:56.640 --> 0:13:59.240
<v Speaker 9>and you know, tariffs were set will be assessed on that.

0:13:59.679 --> 0:14:02.400
<v Speaker 9>With team who's sending in an individual package to a

0:14:02.480 --> 0:14:05.480
<v Speaker 9>US shopper kind of factory direct, it slides in below

0:14:05.480 --> 0:14:07.199
<v Speaker 9>those tariffs. And that's one thing that gave him a

0:14:07.240 --> 0:14:09.000
<v Speaker 9>big price advantage.

0:14:09.080 --> 0:14:12.600
<v Speaker 3>And then during the Trump administration specifically like where because

0:14:12.800 --> 0:14:16.840
<v Speaker 3>we're didn't Various presidents kind of keep raising the amount.

0:14:17.520 --> 0:14:20.160
<v Speaker 9>Yeah, the dominimus has always been there. The loophole's always

0:14:20.200 --> 0:14:23.480
<v Speaker 9>been there. Wish dot Com benefited from it years ago.

0:14:23.840 --> 0:14:26.760
<v Speaker 9>What happened, though, was Trump didn't do anything about Dominimus.

0:14:27.080 --> 0:14:29.880
<v Speaker 9>Trump imposed these new tariffs, so all of a sudden,

0:14:29.880 --> 0:14:32.360
<v Speaker 9>that existing loophole became that much more valuable.

0:14:33.160 --> 0:14:36.200
<v Speaker 4>Is that existing loophole at risk right now? There's a

0:14:36.240 --> 0:14:39.560
<v Speaker 4>lot of confusion over what happens to this loophole in

0:14:39.600 --> 0:14:41.280
<v Speaker 4>this latest round of tariffs.

0:14:42.200 --> 0:14:44.480
<v Speaker 9>Yeah, so Trump said he was going to eliminate the loophole,

0:14:44.520 --> 0:14:46.560
<v Speaker 9>but then he backtracked because you can't just do it

0:14:46.600 --> 0:14:49.360
<v Speaker 9>with like a stroke of a pen. Realized that the agencies,

0:14:49.840 --> 0:14:54.080
<v Speaker 9>particularly like Customs and Border Protection need time to figure

0:14:54.120 --> 0:14:55.560
<v Speaker 9>out a plan and come up with a plan to

0:14:55.600 --> 0:14:57.840
<v Speaker 9>how to handle this volume because we're talking about four

0:14:57.840 --> 0:14:59.200
<v Speaker 9>million packages a day.

0:14:59.480 --> 0:15:02.880
<v Speaker 8>And to the and to the US through this loophole.

0:15:03.680 --> 0:15:06.920
<v Speaker 9>And so, yes, he he signaled that he wants to

0:15:06.960 --> 0:15:09.760
<v Speaker 9>eliminate it, but exactly how that's going to be and

0:15:09.760 --> 0:15:13.400
<v Speaker 9>whether there's still some loophole, maybe a smaller loophole or

0:15:13.680 --> 0:15:16.400
<v Speaker 9>a different loophole, or just no loophole we don't really

0:15:16.400 --> 0:15:18.000
<v Speaker 9>know until we see exactly how this is going to

0:15:18.000 --> 0:15:18.600
<v Speaker 9>be implemented.

0:15:18.720 --> 0:15:21.600
<v Speaker 4>Spencer, you mentioned this as part of a nearly century

0:15:21.640 --> 0:15:25.880
<v Speaker 4>old tax loophole. The people who put this tax loophole

0:15:25.960 --> 0:15:30.840
<v Speaker 4>into effect, they weren't thinking about cat costumes, including.

0:15:30.640 --> 0:15:32.520
<v Speaker 7>Broad costumes, soames.

0:15:32.080 --> 0:15:35.520
<v Speaker 4>Were maybe they were coming from China. What's the history here.

0:15:36.240 --> 0:15:39.239
<v Speaker 9>Yeah, when you when you think about demonimous, what demonimous

0:15:39.320 --> 0:15:42.360
<v Speaker 9>in Latin translates to something of such marginal value to

0:15:42.400 --> 0:15:46.000
<v Speaker 9>be insignificant, Okay. And so when it generally applies to

0:15:46.040 --> 0:15:49.080
<v Speaker 9>is someone returning and the origins of it someone returning

0:15:49.080 --> 0:15:52.440
<v Speaker 9>from a vacation from another country. They've got, you know,

0:15:52.520 --> 0:15:54.760
<v Speaker 9>loot in their suitcase. Maybe you got some T shirts,

0:15:54.800 --> 0:15:56.480
<v Speaker 9>some gifts for your family, that kind of thing.

0:15:56.800 --> 0:15:57.080
<v Speaker 8>You know.

0:15:57.440 --> 0:15:59.880
<v Speaker 9>Without the deminimous loophole, you'd have to pay tariffs on

0:15:59.880 --> 0:16:02.400
<v Speaker 9>that because you're bringing in a product of you know,

0:16:02.440 --> 0:16:05.120
<v Speaker 9>from another country of origin, and the duties would apply.

0:16:05.400 --> 0:16:07.840
<v Speaker 9>But they realized, look, we don't want customs agents bugging

0:16:07.880 --> 0:16:10.960
<v Speaker 9>every person coming back into the country about what's in

0:16:11.000 --> 0:16:13.240
<v Speaker 9>their suitcase. So they set this cap, which is currently

0:16:13.280 --> 0:16:16.200
<v Speaker 9>eight hundred dollars, which is a fairly generous one.

0:16:16.520 --> 0:16:19.400
<v Speaker 8>So that's what it was intended for.

0:16:19.480 --> 0:16:21.760
<v Speaker 9>But then you enter the age of e commerce and

0:16:21.800 --> 0:16:25.120
<v Speaker 9>crosswater e commerce, and suddenly you have this big loophole

0:16:25.160 --> 0:16:26.720
<v Speaker 9>where the same rule applies.

0:16:26.880 --> 0:16:29.320
<v Speaker 8>If if Tim orders that cat.

0:16:29.120 --> 0:16:32.480
<v Speaker 9>Costume on Timu and it's only twenty dollars or whatever,

0:16:32.520 --> 0:16:34.920
<v Speaker 9>it can come in under that loophole and it gives

0:16:34.960 --> 0:16:37.640
<v Speaker 9>you a price advantage over say, brick and mortar stores

0:16:37.640 --> 0:16:39.080
<v Speaker 9>that are bringing products in in bulk.

0:16:39.240 --> 0:16:41.640
<v Speaker 3>I think he definitely has one under his desk. Hey, Spencer,

0:16:41.760 --> 0:16:43.480
<v Speaker 3>you know, I got to be honestly, tried to put

0:16:43.480 --> 0:16:44.360
<v Speaker 3>a costume on a cat.

0:16:45.280 --> 0:16:48.000
<v Speaker 6>They're not dogs. I having a dog, Yeah, they're not dogs.

0:16:48.120 --> 0:16:50.480
<v Speaker 6>Also slippery, Yeah, hey Spencer.

0:16:50.560 --> 0:16:53.160
<v Speaker 3>I think what's interesting is I said to Tim, you know,

0:16:53.840 --> 0:16:55.800
<v Speaker 3>as Timu has popped up and we were reading your story,

0:16:55.800 --> 0:16:57.200
<v Speaker 3>I'm like, have you shot there? And He's like, no,

0:16:57.480 --> 0:17:01.080
<v Speaker 3>I haven't shopped there. But it's massive, fifty million other

0:17:01.240 --> 0:17:04.720
<v Speaker 3>US shoppers. Do remind everybody about the size and scope

0:17:04.760 --> 0:17:06.840
<v Speaker 3>of this because I feel like, if we talk about Amazon,

0:17:06.840 --> 0:17:10.400
<v Speaker 3>everybody knows who Amazon is, but Timo is pretty impressive

0:17:10.440 --> 0:17:13.400
<v Speaker 3>and its growth is really impressive even versus Amazon.

0:17:14.840 --> 0:17:17.120
<v Speaker 8>Yeah, so in just a few years.

0:17:17.840 --> 0:17:21.119
<v Speaker 9>Timu this year is expected to surpass thirty billion in

0:17:22.720 --> 0:17:25.200
<v Speaker 9>gross merchandise value, basically the value of all the goods

0:17:25.240 --> 0:17:26.320
<v Speaker 9>they sell in the US.

0:17:26.520 --> 0:17:27.320
<v Speaker 8>That's a milestone.

0:17:27.320 --> 0:17:30.320
<v Speaker 9>It took Amazon more than a decade to make and

0:17:30.600 --> 0:17:32.320
<v Speaker 9>team Who's going to do that in about three years?

0:17:32.520 --> 0:17:35.360
<v Speaker 9>And the fifty million shoppers is you know, bigger than eBay,

0:17:35.560 --> 0:17:39.480
<v Speaker 9>bigger than Walmart. So it's second, really second only to

0:17:39.560 --> 0:17:40.560
<v Speaker 9>Amazon at this point.

0:17:42.240 --> 0:17:45.840
<v Speaker 4>What are people buying there? Because it's not you know,

0:17:45.920 --> 0:17:49.280
<v Speaker 4>in the sense of Amazon. Amazon's known for getting stuff

0:17:49.400 --> 0:17:52.959
<v Speaker 4>quickly to your doorstep. That's really what they're priding themselves

0:17:53.000 --> 0:17:54.800
<v Speaker 4>on when it comes to prime as you know, Spencer,

0:17:55.040 --> 0:17:56.600
<v Speaker 4>what are people buying on Timu and how has it

0:17:56.680 --> 0:17:57.760
<v Speaker 4>changed the way that people shop.

0:17:59.560 --> 0:18:02.520
<v Speaker 9>It's a little bit of everything, but generally you can think, Okay,

0:18:02.520 --> 0:18:04.639
<v Speaker 9>it's gonna be it's likely going to be something small,

0:18:04.760 --> 0:18:07.640
<v Speaker 9>something light, even though you can find like a bulldozer

0:18:07.680 --> 0:18:10.719
<v Speaker 9>on Team Move believe it or not. But generally, generally

0:18:10.760 --> 0:18:13.840
<v Speaker 9>people are buying things that are small, maybe apparel, small

0:18:13.920 --> 0:18:18.000
<v Speaker 9>kitchen appliances. I've shopped on there a bit. I do

0:18:18.040 --> 0:18:20.120
<v Speaker 9>a lot of do it yourself projects. I bought some

0:18:20.160 --> 0:18:24.800
<v Speaker 9>tools on there. It's generally smaller, smaller items. Arts and

0:18:24.840 --> 0:18:28.000
<v Speaker 9>crafts are are popular on there. Things for like a party,

0:18:28.040 --> 0:18:30.360
<v Speaker 9>if you're throwing a party, it's popular on there. I've

0:18:30.400 --> 0:18:32.359
<v Speaker 9>heard of a lot of teachers who will maybe shop

0:18:32.400 --> 0:18:35.399
<v Speaker 9>there as opposed to going to Dollar Tree or something

0:18:35.440 --> 0:18:38.080
<v Speaker 9>to get you know, gifts for the for their students,

0:18:38.119 --> 0:18:41.119
<v Speaker 9>to motivate them, that kind of thing. So there's a

0:18:41.160 --> 0:18:44.000
<v Speaker 9>whole variety of reasons and a whole bunch of things

0:18:44.080 --> 0:18:45.880
<v Speaker 9>you can you can buy on there, but it can

0:18:45.960 --> 0:18:46.879
<v Speaker 9>be very, very random.

0:18:47.040 --> 0:18:49.199
<v Speaker 4>Can trast the experience a little bit with Amazon, not

0:18:49.240 --> 0:18:52.160
<v Speaker 4>the experience of actually using the website or using the app,

0:18:52.280 --> 0:18:55.160
<v Speaker 4>more so the experience of how stuff gets to your

0:18:55.160 --> 0:18:59.280
<v Speaker 4>doorstep because Amazon has built up this network of distribution

0:18:59.400 --> 0:19:01.960
<v Speaker 4>centers that have employees throughout the country trying to get

0:19:01.960 --> 0:19:04.199
<v Speaker 4>that product close to you very quickly. It's already in

0:19:04.240 --> 0:19:06.879
<v Speaker 4>the US, even if it was made in China or

0:19:06.920 --> 0:19:09.720
<v Speaker 4>in another country. How does something get to you from Timo.

0:19:11.119 --> 0:19:15.200
<v Speaker 9>Yeah, so TIMU and they're shifting based on this tariff

0:19:15.359 --> 0:19:17.439
<v Speaker 9>loophole being changed, and they could see that coming, but

0:19:17.520 --> 0:19:21.800
<v Speaker 9>initially you know, generally it's coming from a factory in

0:19:21.920 --> 0:19:24.679
<v Speaker 9>China to a warehouse in China, and then packed in

0:19:24.680 --> 0:19:27.119
<v Speaker 9>that warehouse in China and then put on a plane

0:19:27.560 --> 0:19:31.399
<v Speaker 9>into maybe JFK or LAX and then to your house.

0:19:31.800 --> 0:19:34.879
<v Speaker 9>So it might take a week ten days. But that

0:19:35.400 --> 0:19:38.520
<v Speaker 9>contrast with Amazon, where they call it like forward deployed.

0:19:38.920 --> 0:19:41.800
<v Speaker 9>You know, the inventory is already in the United States

0:19:41.800 --> 0:19:43.800
<v Speaker 9>before you even order it, and that's why they can

0:19:43.840 --> 0:19:46.040
<v Speaker 9>get it to you so quickly. So what Tim Wu's

0:19:46.080 --> 0:19:49.560
<v Speaker 9>proven is, you know, hey, Amazon, you're big on two

0:19:49.600 --> 0:19:52.520
<v Speaker 9>day delivery, one day delivery, same day delivery. We're finding

0:19:52.520 --> 0:19:55.359
<v Speaker 9>customers out there that are patient if you give them

0:19:55.400 --> 0:19:58.560
<v Speaker 9>a good deal, and they really can beat Amazon and

0:19:58.560 --> 0:20:00.800
<v Speaker 9>a lot of other retailers on their price and people

0:20:00.800 --> 0:20:02.520
<v Speaker 9>are willing to wait for those discounts.

0:20:02.600 --> 0:20:04.359
<v Speaker 3>Well, that's what I thought was also interesting in terms

0:20:04.400 --> 0:20:07.120
<v Speaker 3>of this story that you did. You know, you talk

0:20:07.200 --> 0:20:10.520
<v Speaker 3>about how they really tapped into i think one of

0:20:10.600 --> 0:20:13.439
<v Speaker 3>the founders it was of Tim Wu's parent PDD, the

0:20:13.520 --> 0:20:16.600
<v Speaker 3>rise of the budget conscious consumer, and so they really

0:20:16.600 --> 0:20:19.560
<v Speaker 3>tapped into that and something that Amazon has definitely noticed

0:20:19.600 --> 0:20:21.720
<v Speaker 3>as well.

0:20:21.920 --> 0:20:25.320
<v Speaker 9>Yeah, I mean, if you think about the timing of it, right,

0:20:25.400 --> 0:20:28.680
<v Speaker 9>they came right after the pandemic when people were just

0:20:28.880 --> 0:20:32.639
<v Speaker 9>willing to shop virtually anywhere because people were so desperate

0:20:32.680 --> 0:20:35.000
<v Speaker 9>to get things during the pandemic, so any hesitation about

0:20:35.000 --> 0:20:37.280
<v Speaker 9>a new site kind of went away. That was the

0:20:37.359 --> 0:20:39.800
<v Speaker 9>last thing change in habits. Then we got hit with inflation,

0:20:39.920 --> 0:20:41.320
<v Speaker 9>so all of a sudden, people are like, hey, where

0:20:41.320 --> 0:20:44.160
<v Speaker 9>can I find a deal? So TU struck that nerve

0:20:44.560 --> 0:20:48.840
<v Speaker 9>and yeah, it's just they had the timing right. It

0:20:48.880 --> 0:20:50.440
<v Speaker 9>was the right product at the right time.

0:20:51.720 --> 0:20:54.160
<v Speaker 4>I'm interested in what happens in China, not just at

0:20:54.160 --> 0:20:56.640
<v Speaker 4>these products, but not just when these products are made,

0:20:56.680 --> 0:20:59.680
<v Speaker 4>but at a place like PDD. The story does dive

0:20:59.680 --> 0:21:00.680
<v Speaker 4>into that a little bit.

0:21:03.000 --> 0:21:04.080
<v Speaker 8>About PDD.

0:21:04.440 --> 0:21:08.000
<v Speaker 9>Basically they had luck in China what they called the

0:21:08.040 --> 0:21:11.200
<v Speaker 9>forgotten consumer. So you know, Ali Babo was long the

0:21:11.600 --> 0:21:16.840
<v Speaker 9>leading e commerce company in China, and they, similar to Amazon,

0:21:16.880 --> 0:21:20.080
<v Speaker 9>they really focused on urban areas and more affluent urban customers,

0:21:20.320 --> 0:21:22.800
<v Speaker 9>and PDD said, look, let's let's focus on people the

0:21:22.840 --> 0:21:25.800
<v Speaker 9>more rural areas that still want deals, and a lot

0:21:25.840 --> 0:21:28.400
<v Speaker 9>of it was kind of a group on esque buying environment,

0:21:28.480 --> 0:21:31.119
<v Speaker 9>like you would you you would buy collectively with a

0:21:31.119 --> 0:21:33.679
<v Speaker 9>group of other people to get better, better discounts and

0:21:33.720 --> 0:21:36.120
<v Speaker 9>so that's kind of the origins there, But then they

0:21:36.280 --> 0:21:39.680
<v Speaker 9>they're applying that you know, similar philosophy in the US,

0:21:39.800 --> 0:21:42.919
<v Speaker 9>looking for the folks, you know, things that maybe they

0:21:43.000 --> 0:21:45.080
<v Speaker 9>want that they can't buy or at prices they can't find.

0:21:45.240 --> 0:21:47.920
<v Speaker 4>Spencer, will they be able to deliver on this if

0:21:47.960 --> 0:21:49.320
<v Speaker 4>that tax loophole goes away?

0:21:50.760 --> 0:21:52.840
<v Speaker 8>That's a great question, and that's what everyone's wondering.

0:21:52.840 --> 0:21:57.080
<v Speaker 9>They've already been preparing for it by by uh, you know,

0:21:57.119 --> 0:21:59.480
<v Speaker 9>getting more warehouse space in the US and having more

0:21:59.480 --> 0:22:04.040
<v Speaker 9>inventory in the US and even cultivating relationships with US

0:22:04.040 --> 0:22:06.560
<v Speaker 9>based merchants. So it looks like they're already gearing up

0:22:06.560 --> 0:22:09.320
<v Speaker 9>towards that. And then exactly how these terrorists play out.

0:22:09.480 --> 0:22:13.560
<v Speaker 9>I mean, these things generally, aren't you know, one catastrophic

0:22:13.760 --> 0:22:17.000
<v Speaker 9>ending to everybody. There's gonna be some people who navigate

0:22:17.040 --> 0:22:20.320
<v Speaker 9>it and survive. We might see further delineation in the categories.

0:22:20.320 --> 0:22:22.960
<v Speaker 9>Maybe some categories survive and others don't. But I don't

0:22:22.960 --> 0:22:25.120
<v Speaker 9>think we've seen the last of Team moved here.

0:22:25.240 --> 0:22:26.640
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, And I got to just say, just to wrap

0:22:26.720 --> 0:22:29.360
<v Speaker 3>up just kind about a minute here, Spencer, is that

0:22:29.880 --> 0:22:33.160
<v Speaker 3>you write about the culture of the company of PDD

0:22:33.480 --> 0:22:35.240
<v Speaker 3>and Timu and.

0:22:35.440 --> 0:22:37.960
<v Speaker 6>Sound like in there, that's all I'm saying.

0:22:38.200 --> 0:22:40.160
<v Speaker 3>Sounds like there's some long working days and that they

0:22:40.400 --> 0:22:43.760
<v Speaker 3>will not give up easily. Just some insight into the

0:22:43.760 --> 0:22:44.560
<v Speaker 3>company's culture.

0:22:46.040 --> 0:22:46.960
<v Speaker 8>Yeah, well they they.

0:22:48.440 --> 0:22:51.000
<v Speaker 9>Say eleven eleven six, which is kind of a playoff

0:22:51.040 --> 0:22:53.480
<v Speaker 9>of Ali Baba's nine to nine to six. Basically, people

0:22:53.480 --> 0:22:56.400
<v Speaker 9>working eleven am to eleven pm, six days a week,

0:22:56.720 --> 0:22:58.280
<v Speaker 9>you know, long ruling hours.

0:22:58.480 --> 0:23:00.560
<v Speaker 8>It's hard to fall them for that.

0:23:00.640 --> 0:23:02.520
<v Speaker 9>I mean, I'm sure you can find examples of that

0:23:02.560 --> 0:23:07.840
<v Speaker 9>in the US, but yes, it's known for, you know, uh,

0:23:08.119 --> 0:23:11.480
<v Speaker 9>hiring smart people and motivating them with money. But they're gonna,

0:23:11.480 --> 0:23:13.040
<v Speaker 9>they're gonna earn it. They're gonna, they're gonna work their

0:23:13.040 --> 0:23:13.520
<v Speaker 9>tails off.

0:23:13.800 --> 0:23:15.959
<v Speaker 6>All Right, We're gonna leave it there. Hey, Spencer, thank

0:23:16.000 --> 0:23:17.520
<v Speaker 6>you so much. Glad we could get some time with you.

0:23:17.520 --> 0:23:21.280
<v Speaker 3>Spencer Soaper, technology and e commerce reporter here at Bloomberg News,

0:23:21.359 --> 0:23:24.040
<v Speaker 3>joining us from our bureau in Seattle. This is the

0:23:24.080 --> 0:23:25.000
<v Speaker 3>Bloomberg Big Take Today.

0:23:25.080 --> 0:23:27.520
<v Speaker 4>Everybody check it out at a Bloomberg dot com slash

0:23:27.560 --> 0:23:30.119
<v Speaker 4>a Big Take and also at Bloomberg dot com slash

0:23:30.160 --> 0:23:30.920
<v Speaker 4>and BusinessWeek.

0:23:32.720 --> 0:23:36.480
<v Speaker 2>This is the Bloomberg Business Week podcast. Listen live each

0:23:36.520 --> 0:23:39.840
<v Speaker 2>weekday starting at two pm Eastern on Applecarplay and the

0:23:39.880 --> 0:23:42.720
<v Speaker 2>Android Auto with the Bloomberg Business app. You can also

0:23:42.880 --> 0:23:46.200
<v Speaker 2>listen live on Amazon Alexa from our flagship New York station,

0:23:46.680 --> 0:23:49.280
<v Speaker 2>Just Say Alexa played Bloomberg eleven thirty.

0:23:50.600 --> 0:23:50.760
<v Speaker 10>Well.

0:23:50.800 --> 0:23:54.000
<v Speaker 3>More than one hundred million people are facing frigid conditions

0:23:54.040 --> 0:23:56.640
<v Speaker 3>across the eastern and central United States, and that includes

0:23:56.680 --> 0:24:00.520
<v Speaker 3>the entire state of Texas as an Arctic black threatens

0:24:00.520 --> 0:24:04.040
<v Speaker 3>to break low temperature records. The Electric Reliability Council of

0:24:04.080 --> 0:24:07.239
<v Speaker 3>Texas that's the state's grid operator, said electricity demand will

0:24:07.280 --> 0:24:10.159
<v Speaker 3>jump in the coming days, but it expects to be

0:24:10.240 --> 0:24:12.320
<v Speaker 3>able to meet the spike in consumption.

0:24:12.840 --> 0:24:13.040
<v Speaker 7>Now.

0:24:13.080 --> 0:24:15.960
<v Speaker 3>Regulators and lawmakers have moved to bolster the state's power

0:24:16.000 --> 0:24:18.840
<v Speaker 3>system after the grid collapsed during a series of winter

0:24:18.880 --> 0:24:21.600
<v Speaker 3>storms back in twenty twenty one, killing hundreds of people

0:24:21.880 --> 0:24:23.840
<v Speaker 3>as homes and businesses were left in the dark.

0:24:24.119 --> 0:24:27.280
<v Speaker 6>Someone who knows a lot about the grid system.

0:24:27.000 --> 0:24:29.280
<v Speaker 3>Overall in the United States, but in particular the Texas

0:24:29.320 --> 0:24:31.959
<v Speaker 3>State grid, is our next guest. Zach Dell is co

0:24:32.000 --> 0:24:34.320
<v Speaker 3>founder and CEO based power company. He joins us from

0:24:34.400 --> 0:24:36.719
<v Speaker 3>the Bloomberg News Bureau in Houston, Zach. Great to have

0:24:36.800 --> 0:24:41.680
<v Speaker 3>you here with us. Let's start with Texas. So known

0:24:41.760 --> 0:24:44.359
<v Speaker 3>of course for oil and drilling, it's a leader to

0:24:44.520 --> 0:24:47.320
<v Speaker 3>though in renewables like wind and solar. Tell us first

0:24:47.359 --> 0:24:49.600
<v Speaker 3>of all about the power mix in the Lone Star

0:24:49.640 --> 0:24:52.440
<v Speaker 3>state and the economic models for selling electricity. What should

0:24:52.520 --> 0:24:55.639
<v Speaker 3>kind of the investing audience understand about the state of

0:24:55.640 --> 0:24:56.720
<v Speaker 3>Texas well.

0:24:56.840 --> 0:25:00.720
<v Speaker 1>Texas is the energy capital of the country, the country

0:25:00.720 --> 0:25:04.760
<v Speaker 1>in renewable generation. We have more wind and more so

0:25:04.960 --> 0:25:07.600
<v Speaker 1>or than almost anywhere in the country, and that's because

0:25:07.640 --> 0:25:09.480
<v Speaker 1>Texas is the middle of the wind corridor, it's in

0:25:09.520 --> 0:25:11.240
<v Speaker 1>the middle of the sun Belt, and it's a great

0:25:11.240 --> 0:25:15.000
<v Speaker 1>place to develop energy infrastructure. It's a free market, it's

0:25:15.040 --> 0:25:17.679
<v Speaker 1>a deregulated energy market for the most part. Or COT

0:25:18.560 --> 0:25:21.400
<v Speaker 1>is one of the largest electricity markets in the country,

0:25:21.560 --> 0:25:23.960
<v Speaker 1>and so it's a great place to build energy technology.

0:25:24.119 --> 0:25:25.320
<v Speaker 8>That's why we've decided.

0:25:25.040 --> 0:25:27.840
<v Speaker 1>To start the company here in Texas. But it's also

0:25:28.160 --> 0:25:30.720
<v Speaker 1>a part of the country that's seen incredible population growth,

0:25:30.960 --> 0:25:34.280
<v Speaker 1>it's seen incredible growth in heavy industry, and that's put

0:25:34.320 --> 0:25:36.760
<v Speaker 1>a lot of stress on the grid, and so we

0:25:36.800 --> 0:25:40.480
<v Speaker 1>started the company to increase our capacity for energy consumption

0:25:40.560 --> 0:25:42.640
<v Speaker 1>and add resources to the power grid in the form

0:25:42.720 --> 0:25:46.439
<v Speaker 1>of distributed battery storage to help absorb some of that growth,

0:25:46.680 --> 0:25:50.840
<v Speaker 1>absorb from that demand, and set us up for a

0:25:50.880 --> 0:25:53.880
<v Speaker 1>future of energy abundance and human prosperity here in the state.

0:25:54.119 --> 0:25:56.960
<v Speaker 4>Zach explain where exactly the company lives on the grid

0:25:56.960 --> 0:25:59.920
<v Speaker 4>in the sense of Okay, it's not necessarily a utility,

0:26:00.040 --> 0:26:03.800
<v Speaker 4>it's not necessarily an energy provider. How do you define

0:26:03.800 --> 0:26:05.359
<v Speaker 4>it exactly?

0:26:05.400 --> 0:26:08.240
<v Speaker 1>So we are a distributed energy technology company, So we

0:26:08.320 --> 0:26:11.840
<v Speaker 1>deploy our storage assets on the grid edge on site

0:26:11.960 --> 0:26:15.680
<v Speaker 1>with our customers. So we install batteries on homes today,

0:26:16.560 --> 0:26:19.080
<v Speaker 1>customers sign up for base power, we go install our

0:26:19.119 --> 0:26:21.159
<v Speaker 1>battery on their home. When the grid is up and running.

0:26:21.160 --> 0:26:23.000
<v Speaker 1>We use that battery to support the power grid in

0:26:23.040 --> 0:26:25.240
<v Speaker 1>times of high demand. When the grid goes down. The

0:26:25.240 --> 0:26:27.720
<v Speaker 1>customer gets that battery to protect their home from power averages.

0:26:28.520 --> 0:26:30.159
<v Speaker 3>Well and tell us about it. Like a customer that

0:26:30.240 --> 0:26:33.479
<v Speaker 3>signs up sack exactly what are they getting. They're getting batteries, right,

0:26:33.480 --> 0:26:36.720
<v Speaker 3>and there's installation that's involved. I'm curious about how it works.

0:26:36.800 --> 0:26:38.800
<v Speaker 3>What they get. My understanding is the batteries are big.

0:26:38.880 --> 0:26:40.760
<v Speaker 3>What it costs give me, give us an idea.

0:26:41.600 --> 0:26:44.320
<v Speaker 1>Yes, So customers sign up and pay four ninety five

0:26:44.400 --> 0:26:47.439
<v Speaker 1>upfront and sixteen dollars a month and get all the

0:26:47.480 --> 0:26:50.280
<v Speaker 1>benefits of home backup protection without the high upfront cost

0:26:50.359 --> 0:26:54.080
<v Speaker 1>of buying a large generator or buying a traditional home battery.

0:26:54.119 --> 0:26:57.000
<v Speaker 1>So we install a battery that's twenty five kilod hours

0:26:57.000 --> 0:26:58.880
<v Speaker 1>for one system, and you can you can get two

0:26:58.880 --> 0:27:01.160
<v Speaker 1>systems installed which get you to fifty kilo at hours,

0:27:01.359 --> 0:27:03.720
<v Speaker 1>which will protect your home for up to one to

0:27:03.760 --> 0:27:05.600
<v Speaker 1>two days, depending on the size of the home and

0:27:05.680 --> 0:27:07.639
<v Speaker 1>the event of a power out. So you get a

0:27:07.680 --> 0:27:10.760
<v Speaker 1>really large battery for really low upfront cost and a

0:27:10.800 --> 0:27:13.119
<v Speaker 1>low monthly fee, cheaper than a gym membership, cheaper than

0:27:13.119 --> 0:27:16.879
<v Speaker 1>a Netflix subscription, cheaper than Amazon Prime. And when the

0:27:16.920 --> 0:27:20.760
<v Speaker 1>grid's up and running, you're buying your electricity from us,

0:27:20.880 --> 0:27:22.560
<v Speaker 1>We're able to save you ten to twenty percent a

0:27:22.560 --> 0:27:24.520
<v Speaker 1>month on power, and when the grid goes down, you

0:27:24.520 --> 0:27:27.160
<v Speaker 1>get to protect your home, keep that fridge going, keep

0:27:27.160 --> 0:27:29.760
<v Speaker 1>your AC running, keep your lights on, and keep your

0:27:29.760 --> 0:27:30.359
<v Speaker 1>family safe.

0:27:30.560 --> 0:27:32.600
<v Speaker 4>Zach, we're talking about this in the context of Texas,

0:27:32.600 --> 0:27:34.000
<v Speaker 4>of course, and a lot of focus has been on

0:27:34.000 --> 0:27:38.320
<v Speaker 4>Texas's grid also California's grid another state that comes into focus.

0:27:38.320 --> 0:27:40.960
<v Speaker 4>Any plans to expand to California.

0:27:41.000 --> 0:27:41.480
<v Speaker 7>Absolutely.

0:27:41.800 --> 0:27:43.639
<v Speaker 1>We hope to be in all fifty states over the

0:27:43.640 --> 0:27:46.280
<v Speaker 1>next couple of years, and we're working to partner with

0:27:46.320 --> 0:27:49.320
<v Speaker 1>some of the regulated utilities in states like California that

0:27:49.359 --> 0:27:52.040
<v Speaker 1>don't have a deregulated energy market. Texas is an amazing

0:27:52.040 --> 0:27:54.440
<v Speaker 1>place to start the business because the vast majority of

0:27:54.440 --> 0:27:57.840
<v Speaker 1>the state, about eighty percent, is deregulated. So we are

0:27:57.880 --> 0:28:00.320
<v Speaker 1>actually a retail actor provider and a battery develop heloper.

0:28:00.480 --> 0:28:02.399
<v Speaker 1>So we sell power directly to the homeowner and then

0:28:02.400 --> 0:28:04.399
<v Speaker 1>we own and operate the batteries on site. In a

0:28:04.440 --> 0:28:09.320
<v Speaker 1>state like California, you have regulator utilities like LEDWP and

0:28:09.440 --> 0:28:13.639
<v Speaker 1>PGNE that have kind of geographic monopolies over certain areas,

0:28:13.680 --> 0:28:16.560
<v Speaker 1>and so we'll partner directly with those regulated utilities provide

0:28:16.560 --> 0:28:19.640
<v Speaker 1>our hardware and software to them to enter those markets.

0:28:19.800 --> 0:28:21.880
<v Speaker 3>And from what I understand too, Zach, that the success

0:28:21.920 --> 0:28:24.160
<v Speaker 3>of the company's contingent on more and more people right

0:28:24.280 --> 0:28:26.960
<v Speaker 3>signing up, Right, you need to kind of have a network.

0:28:28.400 --> 0:28:32.439
<v Speaker 1>Well, not necessarily, we're able to operate our batteries at

0:28:32.480 --> 0:28:35.280
<v Speaker 1>the individual level, so we don't necessarily there's not like

0:28:35.320 --> 0:28:37.920
<v Speaker 1>traditional network effect benefits to more people signing up, but

0:28:37.960 --> 0:28:41.320
<v Speaker 1>obviously benefit businesses benefit from scale, and we benefit from

0:28:41.320 --> 0:28:43.800
<v Speaker 1>scale in the same ways. But it's not like the

0:28:43.840 --> 0:28:45.880
<v Speaker 1>system doesn't work well if a couple people in the

0:28:45.880 --> 0:28:49.280
<v Speaker 1>neighborhood have it. There's really no meaningful difference if you're

0:28:49.320 --> 0:28:51.040
<v Speaker 1>the only one in your neighborhood or everyone in your

0:28:51.040 --> 0:28:53.520
<v Speaker 1>neighborhood has based power all right.

0:28:53.360 --> 0:28:55.840
<v Speaker 3>So if you're as an individual, there's no difference. But

0:28:56.720 --> 0:28:59.360
<v Speaker 3>what do you get out of building that scale?

0:29:00.680 --> 0:29:03.360
<v Speaker 1>Well, we benefit from scale, just like most businesses benefit

0:29:03.360 --> 0:29:05.200
<v Speaker 1>from scale. So we have economies of scale on the

0:29:05.200 --> 0:29:08.719
<v Speaker 1>supply chain side, on the engineering side, building out our

0:29:08.720 --> 0:29:12.280
<v Speaker 1>team our resources. The larger we get, the lower the

0:29:12.280 --> 0:29:14.440
<v Speaker 1>cost that we can provide to the customer. So our

0:29:14.440 --> 0:29:17.280
<v Speaker 1>goals and businesses to develop a compounding cost advantage to

0:29:17.360 --> 0:29:20.200
<v Speaker 1>vertical integration. So we develop our own batteries, we develop

0:29:20.200 --> 0:29:22.440
<v Speaker 1>our own software, we manage the insulation, we sell power

0:29:22.440 --> 0:29:24.560
<v Speaker 1>directly with the homeowner, and by doing all those things,

0:29:24.600 --> 0:29:26.880
<v Speaker 1>we can drive the cost down for the customer and

0:29:26.920 --> 0:29:29.360
<v Speaker 1>deliver the most affordable and most reliable power.

0:29:29.440 --> 0:29:31.560
<v Speaker 3>Right Because from what I understand too you're monitoring what

0:29:31.680 --> 0:29:34.040
<v Speaker 3>the prices of energy, and so when it goes down,

0:29:34.120 --> 0:29:35.520
<v Speaker 3>you guys are filling up the batteries.

0:29:35.520 --> 0:29:38.200
<v Speaker 8>Correct, that's right, hey, Zach.

0:29:39.160 --> 0:29:41.600
<v Speaker 4>If a power company sees what you're doing right now

0:29:41.640 --> 0:29:43.520
<v Speaker 4>and says, wait a second, that's a really good idea.

0:29:43.560 --> 0:29:46.880
<v Speaker 4>What's to stop con ED or PGNE on California from

0:29:47.000 --> 0:29:49.080
<v Speaker 4>basically replicating what you're doing, but they already have the

0:29:49.120 --> 0:29:50.280
<v Speaker 4>relationship with the customer.

0:29:51.360 --> 0:29:53.640
<v Speaker 1>Well, it's very hard. You have to become an expert

0:29:53.800 --> 0:29:59.120
<v Speaker 1>in battery hardware engineering, power electronics, supply chain operations. You

0:29:59.160 --> 0:30:00.880
<v Speaker 1>have to deploy these batter on site, you have to

0:30:00.880 --> 0:30:02.560
<v Speaker 1>interface directly with the customers, you have to build a

0:30:02.600 --> 0:30:06.280
<v Speaker 1>consumer brand. There's a lot of interesting and challenging distributed

0:30:06.320 --> 0:30:08.320
<v Speaker 1>systems software problems that you have to solve to deploy

0:30:08.320 --> 0:30:10.880
<v Speaker 1>this technology. So we're really excited to partner with those

0:30:10.960 --> 0:30:14.680
<v Speaker 1>utilities and help them deploy battery technology in their service territories.

0:30:15.040 --> 0:30:17.320
<v Speaker 1>As you guys know, these investor owned utilities are not

0:30:17.560 --> 0:30:19.800
<v Speaker 1>incentivized to invest money in op X in R and

0:30:19.880 --> 0:30:22.400
<v Speaker 1>D their capecks driven businesses. They earn a regulated way

0:30:22.400 --> 0:30:24.680
<v Speaker 1>to return on their capex, and so their incentive is

0:30:24.720 --> 0:30:28.320
<v Speaker 1>really to deploy capex and their service territory, and you know,

0:30:28.360 --> 0:30:31.000
<v Speaker 1>they add that into their rate base and that kind

0:30:31.000 --> 0:30:33.480
<v Speaker 1>of influences what they end up charging the end consumer.

0:30:33.760 --> 0:30:35.200
<v Speaker 1>Our business is a little bit different. We're an R

0:30:35.200 --> 0:30:37.880
<v Speaker 1>and D driven business. We develop technology and we bet

0:30:37.880 --> 0:30:39.720
<v Speaker 1>that technology is going to benefit the customer and we

0:30:39.800 --> 0:30:42.760
<v Speaker 1>benefit downstream of that. And so we think that we're

0:30:42.960 --> 0:30:45.200
<v Speaker 1>an obvious partner or some of these regulated utilities as

0:30:45.280 --> 0:30:47.520
<v Speaker 1>kind of an R and D partner where we can

0:30:47.560 --> 0:30:49.720
<v Speaker 1>develop technology and then we can go deploy that technology

0:30:49.720 --> 0:30:52.280
<v Speaker 1>in their service territory. They benefit, we benefit, and the

0:30:52.320 --> 0:30:53.440
<v Speaker 1>homeowner benefits as well.

0:30:53.440 --> 0:30:55.600
<v Speaker 3>I am also curious are you profitable or how many

0:30:55.600 --> 0:30:57.040
<v Speaker 3>states do you think you have to build, you know,

0:30:57.120 --> 0:30:59.960
<v Speaker 3>reach out to or expand to before you are profitable.

0:31:01.080 --> 0:31:03.720
<v Speaker 1>I don't think about it as a number of states number.

0:31:03.760 --> 0:31:06.240
<v Speaker 1>It's really about building the fleet and getting to scale.

0:31:06.360 --> 0:31:08.360
<v Speaker 1>And so, you know, we started the company a little

0:31:08.440 --> 0:31:10.800
<v Speaker 1>under two years ago. We launched a product in May.

0:31:10.840 --> 0:31:12.840
<v Speaker 1>We've been scaling rapidly. We're doing on the order of

0:31:12.840 --> 0:31:15.400
<v Speaker 1>twenty battery installation of the day. We'll continue to scale

0:31:15.480 --> 0:31:18.479
<v Speaker 1>up at a faster and faster rate and move outside

0:31:18.480 --> 0:31:21.160
<v Speaker 1>of Texas, in states like California and other states across

0:31:21.160 --> 0:31:23.560
<v Speaker 1>the country, and you know, we think there's a really

0:31:23.560 --> 0:31:27.040
<v Speaker 1>attractive kind of economic proposition for the business going forward.

0:31:27.080 --> 0:31:29.560
<v Speaker 3>Hey, Zach, we'd be remiss. Your dad, Michael dal iconic

0:31:29.640 --> 0:31:32.040
<v Speaker 3>in the tech world. This isn't the first company you've founded.

0:31:32.080 --> 0:31:35.000
<v Speaker 3>You've worked at pe Giant Blackstone, also an investor at

0:31:35.000 --> 0:31:39.560
<v Speaker 3>Thrive Capital. They of course founded by Josh Kushner. They've

0:31:39.640 --> 0:31:43.000
<v Speaker 3>invested in your company. I am curious about growing up,

0:31:43.160 --> 0:31:45.120
<v Speaker 3>you know, with your dad. How did your dad influence you?

0:31:47.120 --> 0:31:48.960
<v Speaker 1>Well, I think, you know, I'm the luckiest guy in

0:31:49.000 --> 0:31:51.640
<v Speaker 1>the world. I've got the most incredible CEO coaches as

0:31:51.640 --> 0:31:55.080
<v Speaker 1>my dad. We're extremely close. We talk all the time.

0:31:55.680 --> 0:31:57.920
<v Speaker 1>He's not an investor in the business, but he's a

0:31:58.000 --> 0:32:02.000
<v Speaker 1>very close advisor and confidant and and friend. And you know,

0:32:02.040 --> 0:32:03.800
<v Speaker 1>I think people always ask me, like, oh, why do

0:32:03.800 --> 0:32:05.440
<v Speaker 1>you want to start a company? And I think it's

0:32:05.520 --> 0:32:07.360
<v Speaker 1>kind of a silly question because I got to see

0:32:07.360 --> 0:32:09.200
<v Speaker 1>my dad, you know, live his dream and continue to

0:32:09.200 --> 0:32:11.560
<v Speaker 1>live his dreams. He's still a CEO of Dell. He

0:32:11.600 --> 0:32:14.400
<v Speaker 1>gets to play the most interesting game at the highest level.

0:32:15.240 --> 0:32:17.040
<v Speaker 1>And you know, I aspire to do that too. So

0:32:17.560 --> 0:32:19.880
<v Speaker 1>he's an inspiration. He's he's a hero, he's a role model.

0:32:20.280 --> 0:32:22.360
<v Speaker 1>And people like Josh and some of the folks at

0:32:22.360 --> 0:32:23.960
<v Speaker 1>Blackstone that I've gotten a chance to work with in

0:32:24.000 --> 0:32:27.600
<v Speaker 1>my career have have been kind of similarly inspiring to me.

0:32:27.720 --> 0:32:31.160
<v Speaker 1>So I'm really excited to follow in his footsteps and

0:32:31.440 --> 0:32:35.040
<v Speaker 1>you know, try to build something really important for the world.

0:32:35.320 --> 0:32:37.280
<v Speaker 4>You said he's not an investor in the company, Zachy,

0:32:37.400 --> 0:32:40.120
<v Speaker 4>yet we could say, yeah, are you out there planning

0:32:40.120 --> 0:32:40.920
<v Speaker 4>to raise more money?

0:32:42.120 --> 0:32:44.640
<v Speaker 1>We will raise more capital as the business skills. Yes,

0:32:44.720 --> 0:32:46.440
<v Speaker 1>for sure. I joke with him that, you know, he's

0:32:46.440 --> 0:32:48.080
<v Speaker 1>a late stage investor, so if he wants to invest,

0:32:48.120 --> 0:32:49.280
<v Speaker 1>he's gonna have to pay a high price.

0:32:50.400 --> 0:32:53.800
<v Speaker 3>Well done, You've learned well, as they would say, Hey, listen,

0:32:54.040 --> 0:32:55.840
<v Speaker 3>stay in touch. Let us know I as you continue

0:32:55.880 --> 0:32:58.280
<v Speaker 3>to expand and build out, stay in touch and love

0:32:58.320 --> 0:33:01.240
<v Speaker 3>to get some updates. Sechedal Co found under and CEO

0:33:01.280 --> 0:33:03.560
<v Speaker 3>based power company. Joining us from our Houston bureau.

0:33:04.520 --> 0:33:07.880
<v Speaker 2>You are listening to the Bloomberg Business Week podcast. Catch

0:33:07.960 --> 0:33:11.200
<v Speaker 2>us live weekday afternoons from two to five pm Eastern

0:33:11.320 --> 0:33:13.840
<v Speaker 2>Listen on Apple CarPlay and the Android auto with the

0:33:13.840 --> 0:33:17.520
<v Speaker 2>Bloomberg Business app or watch us live on YouTube.

0:33:18.240 --> 0:33:21.240
<v Speaker 4>Taryl Investor's still focused on what's the com regarding tariffs.

0:33:21.280 --> 0:33:24.080
<v Speaker 4>President Trump mentioned the possibility of tariffs of twenty five

0:33:24.120 --> 0:33:27.760
<v Speaker 4>percent on autos and pharmaceuticals just yesterday.

0:33:28.120 --> 0:33:31.320
<v Speaker 11>Some of the biggest companies in the world, and because

0:33:31.360 --> 0:33:34.360
<v Speaker 11>of what we're doing economically and through tariffs and taxas

0:33:34.360 --> 0:33:38.360
<v Speaker 11>and incentives, they want to come back into the United States.

0:33:38.440 --> 0:33:42.000
<v Speaker 2>Have you decided specifically what the auto tariff rain should be.

0:33:42.200 --> 0:33:45.920
<v Speaker 11>Yeah, I probably will tell you that on April second,

0:33:46.400 --> 0:33:48.600
<v Speaker 11>but it'll be in the neighborhood of twenty five percent.

0:33:48.720 --> 0:33:50.760
<v Speaker 11>We want to give them time to come in because,

0:33:50.800 --> 0:33:52.800
<v Speaker 11>as you know, when they come into the United States

0:33:52.840 --> 0:33:55.520
<v Speaker 11>and they have their plant or factory here, there is

0:33:55.520 --> 0:33:58.360
<v Speaker 11>no tariffs. So we want to give them a little

0:33:58.360 --> 0:33:58.960
<v Speaker 11>bit of a chance.

0:33:59.280 --> 0:34:01.400
<v Speaker 4>Well, they have the press in just yesterday at mar

0:34:01.480 --> 0:34:04.200
<v Speaker 4>Lago talking the latest on tariffs. We continue our talk

0:34:04.200 --> 0:34:08.440
<v Speaker 4>on tariffs and macro affecting the business and financial market environment,

0:34:08.880 --> 0:34:11.040
<v Speaker 4>this time with the head of Ignite. It makes software

0:34:11.080 --> 0:34:14.239
<v Speaker 4>for enterprise companies to secure and manage massive amounts of data.

0:34:14.280 --> 0:34:16.560
<v Speaker 4>The companies raised one hundred and forty million dollars in

0:34:16.600 --> 0:34:20.319
<v Speaker 4>metric capital from Google Ventures, Kleiner Perkins, Goldman Sachs and

0:34:20.360 --> 0:34:23.760
<v Speaker 4>others and accounts companies such as Red Bull, Steve Madden

0:34:24.120 --> 0:34:26.480
<v Speaker 4>and Beyontech as customers.

0:34:27.000 --> 0:34:28.719
<v Speaker 3>Great to have you here with us, Fanied. You know,

0:34:28.880 --> 0:34:31.239
<v Speaker 3>let's let's get to it in terms of what we

0:34:31.320 --> 0:34:34.280
<v Speaker 3>continue to get from President Trump and the White House

0:34:34.320 --> 0:34:37.040
<v Speaker 3>regarding tariffs, and again a lot to be known in

0:34:37.120 --> 0:34:41.279
<v Speaker 3>terms of the actuality of what gets imposed and for

0:34:41.360 --> 0:34:45.120
<v Speaker 3>how long. How do you see it as what might

0:34:45.160 --> 0:34:47.680
<v Speaker 3>be the reality of tariffs in your world.

0:34:49.120 --> 0:34:51.439
<v Speaker 10>Hey, Carol Love in my world, you know, I'm talking

0:34:51.480 --> 0:34:54.440
<v Speaker 10>about We are a software as a service provider. So

0:34:54.520 --> 0:34:58.200
<v Speaker 10>anything that impacts IP systems, whether it's servers, networking gear,

0:34:58.400 --> 0:35:01.840
<v Speaker 10>data center components, those would be the ones that I

0:35:01.880 --> 0:35:05.360
<v Speaker 10>would be most interested in, not the autos or pharaceuticals,

0:35:05.440 --> 0:35:09.240
<v Speaker 10>although there's always a cascading impact if there's a general inflation.

0:35:10.920 --> 0:35:14.040
<v Speaker 10>Now I know the numbers on the tariff side keep

0:35:14.080 --> 0:35:17.480
<v Speaker 10>ratcheting up. New announcements are coming out regularly. So a

0:35:17.520 --> 0:35:19.279
<v Speaker 10>couple of tuesdays back, I think there was a ten

0:35:19.320 --> 0:35:24.360
<v Speaker 10>percent tariff announced for this class of hardware. So the

0:35:24.480 --> 0:35:29.960
<v Speaker 10>question is if the underlying data center equipment becomes more expensive,

0:35:29.960 --> 0:35:32.160
<v Speaker 10>and keep in mind a lot of a lot of

0:35:32.200 --> 0:35:35.560
<v Speaker 10>it is made in China. Will that have an impact

0:35:35.640 --> 0:35:39.480
<v Speaker 10>on the ultimate end user solutions that companies like ourselves provide.

0:35:39.640 --> 0:35:45.640
<v Speaker 10>I don't think so, because these costing preases can be

0:35:45.680 --> 0:35:49.600
<v Speaker 10>absorbed by the providers, including companies like ourselves, with some

0:35:49.719 --> 0:35:53.120
<v Speaker 10>impact to the gross margin, but it's not significant yet

0:35:53.680 --> 0:35:56.440
<v Speaker 10>unless these numbers start crossing into twenty five percent or

0:35:56.480 --> 0:36:00.000
<v Speaker 10>higher territory. Until then, I would say I'm pretty sang

0:36:00.080 --> 0:36:01.680
<v Speaker 10>whine about it.

0:36:01.840 --> 0:36:06.560
<v Speaker 4>Is the concern, though, compounded when you think about your customers.

0:36:06.560 --> 0:36:09.200
<v Speaker 4>I mentioned Red Bull, Steve Madden, BEYONCEK just a few

0:36:09.200 --> 0:36:12.560
<v Speaker 4>of your customers. Steve Madden a company that I would

0:36:12.600 --> 0:36:17.200
<v Speaker 4>imagine makes products in China. If they're hit with bigger tariffs,

0:36:17.960 --> 0:36:19.680
<v Speaker 4>then what happens to the amount that they're able to

0:36:19.719 --> 0:36:21.200
<v Speaker 4>spend on services such as yours?

0:36:22.320 --> 0:36:22.440
<v Speaker 9>Oh?

0:36:22.480 --> 0:36:25.719
<v Speaker 10>Absolutely, I think you actually use the right word compounding,

0:36:25.760 --> 0:36:31.560
<v Speaker 10>because ultimately any cost increases for our own customers. Steve

0:36:31.560 --> 0:36:34.200
<v Speaker 10>Madden is a great example. I mean, the fact remains

0:36:34.239 --> 0:36:37.239
<v Speaker 10>that despite all the effort to move manufacturing out of

0:36:37.320 --> 0:36:40.719
<v Speaker 10>China to countries like Vietnam, to Malaysia and even to

0:36:40.760 --> 0:36:44.080
<v Speaker 10>some in India. China is still the factory of the world.

0:36:44.760 --> 0:36:48.640
<v Speaker 10>So it's absolutely normal to assume that if they are

0:36:48.680 --> 0:36:52.560
<v Speaker 10>going to experience cost increases, they being the companies that

0:36:52.600 --> 0:36:55.919
<v Speaker 10>you mentioned, Steve Madden or whoever else, they will pass

0:36:55.920 --> 0:36:58.160
<v Speaker 10>it down to the customers. If they can't, it eats

0:36:58.200 --> 0:37:01.279
<v Speaker 10>up in the gross margin. If they don't want to

0:37:01.320 --> 0:37:04.160
<v Speaker 10>pass the cost down, then they'll squeez supplies like ourselves.

0:37:04.239 --> 0:37:07.320
<v Speaker 10>So there is absolutely a trickle down or rather compounding effect,

0:37:07.320 --> 0:37:08.440
<v Speaker 10>as you eloquently put it.

0:37:09.200 --> 0:37:11.279
<v Speaker 3>We are talking with finiche and co founder and CEO

0:37:11.320 --> 0:37:15.319
<v Speaker 3>of Ignite. He's joining us from Mountain View, California. What

0:37:15.400 --> 0:37:18.120
<v Speaker 3>about global supply chains? Do you think that they will

0:37:18.120 --> 0:37:22.359
<v Speaker 3>be potentially changed forever? Again, devil in the details when

0:37:22.360 --> 0:37:25.600
<v Speaker 3>it comes to the particulars around tariffs, what they are on,

0:37:26.000 --> 0:37:27.920
<v Speaker 3>how large they are, and how long they last. But

0:37:28.040 --> 0:37:31.319
<v Speaker 3>having said that, I do wonder about the psyche that's

0:37:31.400 --> 0:37:34.600
<v Speaker 3>changing within the business environment, thinking we need to get

0:37:34.640 --> 0:37:37.680
<v Speaker 3>out of this mess. Who knows, whether it's this administration

0:37:37.840 --> 0:37:39.960
<v Speaker 3>or what's to come, that maybe we need to have

0:37:40.000 --> 0:37:42.880
<v Speaker 3>our global supply chains or our supply chain in the

0:37:42.920 --> 0:37:45.800
<v Speaker 3>same market that we're selling and is that even possible.

0:37:46.600 --> 0:37:48.840
<v Speaker 10>Carol, That's a very interesting thing. One is the aspiration

0:37:48.920 --> 0:37:51.719
<v Speaker 10>and there is the ground reality. The fact is, for

0:37:51.760 --> 0:37:54.799
<v Speaker 10>decades and decades we have been relying no matter what

0:37:54.800 --> 0:37:57.960
<v Speaker 10>the industry is, whether it's furniture or pharmaceutical or bulgrugs,

0:37:58.400 --> 0:38:00.560
<v Speaker 10>China is, as I said, the factory of the world,

0:38:01.200 --> 0:38:04.000
<v Speaker 10>and to try to shift out of China will take

0:38:04.560 --> 0:38:08.640
<v Speaker 10>a lot longer than what we might assume. Now, there's

0:38:08.680 --> 0:38:11.120
<v Speaker 10>certain things which are fairly fungible that you can switch

0:38:11.120 --> 0:38:14.080
<v Speaker 10>out quite quickly, but the entire supply chain, all the

0:38:14.120 --> 0:38:17.600
<v Speaker 10>way from component suppliers if I'm talking about manufacturing to

0:38:17.680 --> 0:38:21.720
<v Speaker 10>subassembly makers to the final product makers, they're all in China,

0:38:22.440 --> 0:38:25.359
<v Speaker 10>and you can take piece meals of that out over time.

0:38:25.400 --> 0:38:28.840
<v Speaker 10>But we are looking at a multi decade effort across

0:38:28.840 --> 0:38:31.439
<v Speaker 10>the board, across all industries, if I were to generalize.

0:38:31.800 --> 0:38:34.160
<v Speaker 10>So we'll have to live with the fact that our

0:38:34.239 --> 0:38:39.360
<v Speaker 10>dependence in China is not getting diluted or reduced in

0:38:39.440 --> 0:38:41.920
<v Speaker 10>the foreseable future. And when I say forcable future, I'm

0:38:41.920 --> 0:38:43.799
<v Speaker 10>talking about at least for the next five years.

0:38:44.960 --> 0:38:49.719
<v Speaker 4>So, given given your experience running this company, the other

0:38:49.800 --> 0:38:54.440
<v Speaker 4>experience that you've had in Silicon Valley and understanding supply

0:38:54.600 --> 0:38:58.520
<v Speaker 4>chains of hardware. Do we have as a country the

0:38:58.640 --> 0:39:03.040
<v Speaker 4>United States, what it takes to to compel companies to

0:39:03.160 --> 0:39:05.840
<v Speaker 4>build these products in the United States? Do we have

0:39:05.920 --> 0:39:08.000
<v Speaker 4>that technology? Do we have that ability?

0:39:09.680 --> 0:39:11.799
<v Speaker 10>You know, you ask a very difficult question because it

0:39:11.840 --> 0:39:13.840
<v Speaker 10>depends on what are you referring to. So, for instance,

0:39:13.880 --> 0:39:16.560
<v Speaker 10>are we trying to replicate a TSMC here, and you know,

0:39:16.560 --> 0:39:21.200
<v Speaker 10>all the efforts underway. In fact, there's a lot more noise,

0:39:21.239 --> 0:39:24.400
<v Speaker 10>especially around with the news of Intel yesterday, with Broadcom

0:39:24.440 --> 0:39:28.000
<v Speaker 10>TSMC looking at them. But the honest answer is the

0:39:28.040 --> 0:39:30.920
<v Speaker 10>intellectual capital is still ours. We are the ones who

0:39:31.520 --> 0:39:33.000
<v Speaker 10>owned the R and D. We are the ones who

0:39:33.080 --> 0:39:36.200
<v Speaker 10>owned the design. Now, if you are a Cisco or

0:39:36.239 --> 0:39:39.600
<v Speaker 10>an Arista, you are getting the manufacturing done by your

0:39:39.600 --> 0:39:46.959
<v Speaker 10>contract manufacturers like JABL Filextronix, Selectron. Bringing those manufacturing capabilities

0:39:47.000 --> 0:39:51.439
<v Speaker 10>in house is non trivial. But given it's our own

0:39:51.760 --> 0:39:56.080
<v Speaker 10>intellectual capital, manufacturing prowess is still within our hands. It's

0:39:56.120 --> 0:39:59.680
<v Speaker 10>the investment and the will and the most important thing

0:39:59.680 --> 0:40:02.280
<v Speaker 10>that people don't talk about finding the talent or grooming

0:40:02.360 --> 0:40:04.680
<v Speaker 10>the talent with vocational skills is going to be critical,

0:40:05.000 --> 0:40:07.279
<v Speaker 10>but it can be done. But I would say you're

0:40:07.320 --> 0:40:10.120
<v Speaker 10>talking about a decade or so where art depends on

0:40:10.239 --> 0:40:12.759
<v Speaker 10>China becomes less and less. It won't be any time

0:40:12.760 --> 0:40:13.320
<v Speaker 10>in the future.

0:40:14.360 --> 0:40:17.080
<v Speaker 3>Hey, you know, while we have you Vanit, you guys

0:40:17.320 --> 0:40:21.600
<v Speaker 3>are all about data. You have been invested, You've received

0:40:21.680 --> 0:40:25.719
<v Speaker 3>venture capital from Google Ventures, Kleana Perkins, Goldman Sachs, kind

0:40:25.719 --> 0:40:28.440
<v Speaker 3>of a who's who when it comes to tech investing,

0:40:28.480 --> 0:40:32.799
<v Speaker 3>certainly impressive investors. The AI craze that we are in

0:40:32.920 --> 0:40:38.640
<v Speaker 3>year two in counting, Chatchipt, deep Seek. You know, everyone's

0:40:38.640 --> 0:40:41.080
<v Speaker 3>still talking about AI, but it is also kind of

0:40:41.080 --> 0:40:45.720
<v Speaker 3>interesting how deep seek has maybe disrupted the conversation around AI.

0:40:45.840 --> 0:40:47.920
<v Speaker 6>If you will tell us about the.

0:40:47.880 --> 0:40:51.640
<v Speaker 3>Demands for your services and what insight you have in

0:40:51.680 --> 0:40:56.680
<v Speaker 3>this kind of build out to ll MS and AI,

0:40:56.840 --> 0:40:59.000
<v Speaker 3>this next way that's been you know, as I said

0:40:59.000 --> 0:41:00.279
<v Speaker 3>two years in counting.

0:41:01.480 --> 0:41:04.360
<v Speaker 10>My first statement would be is a little radical. I

0:41:04.400 --> 0:41:08.480
<v Speaker 10>would promply say that the hype cycle on AI is

0:41:08.520 --> 0:41:11.439
<v Speaker 10>the highest of any tech trend that I've ever seen.

0:41:11.480 --> 0:41:13.320
<v Speaker 10>And just to remind you, I've been in the valley

0:41:13.360 --> 0:41:14.640
<v Speaker 10>for thirty two years.

0:41:15.040 --> 0:41:16.160
<v Speaker 7>I've seen fads.

0:41:15.880 --> 0:41:19.319
<v Speaker 10>Come and go crypto web three. Oh you name it right,

0:41:19.880 --> 0:41:22.560
<v Speaker 10>but right now the crescendo in the news, and in fact,

0:41:22.600 --> 0:41:25.240
<v Speaker 10>the joke is, you know, we get these daily newsletters

0:41:25.280 --> 0:41:28.239
<v Speaker 10>about investments. Today I was looking at one and I

0:41:28.280 --> 0:41:33.080
<v Speaker 10>saw eleven investments or fundraises announced, sorry, eleven fourteen. Each

0:41:33.120 --> 0:41:36.239
<v Speaker 10>of them led AI driven, this, AI driven that, AI

0:41:36.320 --> 0:41:38.719
<v Speaker 10>driven something. So you clearly know that we are the

0:41:38.719 --> 0:41:41.120
<v Speaker 10>peak of the hype cycle. But if you leave aside

0:41:41.480 --> 0:41:45.760
<v Speaker 10>the hiphe aspect of it, the reality is customers. In fact,

0:41:46.160 --> 0:41:47.879
<v Speaker 10>as I speak, right next to me is a big

0:41:47.880 --> 0:41:50.799
<v Speaker 10>conference room. We have one of our largest customers. There's

0:41:50.800 --> 0:41:53.600
<v Speaker 10>CIO sitting with fourteen members of my team, and this

0:41:53.680 --> 0:41:56.279
<v Speaker 10>is one of the largest advertising companies in the world.

0:41:56.360 --> 0:41:59.120
<v Speaker 10>I can't name them. And the whole conversation is about

0:41:59.160 --> 0:42:01.080
<v Speaker 10>AI and of course all the things we are doing

0:42:01.120 --> 0:42:04.520
<v Speaker 10>along with other providers, they're leveraging. So the challenge is

0:42:04.800 --> 0:42:07.520
<v Speaker 10>to be very simple. There is a huge value to

0:42:07.520 --> 0:42:10.680
<v Speaker 10>be delivered with a slew of these generative AI capabilities.

0:42:10.760 --> 0:42:13.439
<v Speaker 10>Open Eyes just one of the providers. But the big

0:42:13.480 --> 0:42:16.720
<v Speaker 10>problem is the value expectation that your customers have today

0:42:17.560 --> 0:42:20.640
<v Speaker 10>versus the value delivery i e. The capabilities we are providing.

0:42:20.920 --> 0:42:24.960
<v Speaker 10>There's a big gap, and therefore people are wanting that

0:42:25.040 --> 0:42:27.959
<v Speaker 10>gap to diminish before it becomes commonplace. But I still

0:42:28.000 --> 0:42:31.240
<v Speaker 10>maintain all the AI capabilities that we are talking about

0:42:31.280 --> 0:42:33.480
<v Speaker 10>that are being invented as we speak, or will be

0:42:33.560 --> 0:42:35.960
<v Speaker 10>rolled out in the next two years. Take my word

0:42:36.000 --> 0:42:38.640
<v Speaker 10>for it, they'll become commoditized. People would expect that to

0:42:38.680 --> 0:42:42.640
<v Speaker 10>be included in your product. Over time. What differentiates you

0:42:42.800 --> 0:42:44.560
<v Speaker 10>or the premium they're willing to pay, will be a

0:42:44.640 --> 0:42:47.640
<v Speaker 10>much higher value stack of services. But it's a journey

0:42:47.840 --> 0:42:50.279
<v Speaker 10>and we are on that. So the problem is real,

0:42:50.560 --> 0:42:53.279
<v Speaker 10>the solutions are real, but the hype cycle is absolutely

0:42:53.320 --> 0:42:55.360
<v Speaker 10>at the zenith, more than anything I've seen before.

0:42:55.520 --> 0:42:58.279
<v Speaker 4>It sounds like, though, this time is different words I

0:42:58.280 --> 0:43:02.239
<v Speaker 4>should never say, so trying to get you to say them. Yes,

0:43:02.320 --> 0:43:04.640
<v Speaker 4>it's time to learn it than the dot com bubble.

0:43:05.640 --> 0:43:08.359
<v Speaker 10>Yeah, I would not say that. You know you've heard

0:43:08.400 --> 0:43:13.080
<v Speaker 10>that phrase before. This time is different. No, it's just

0:43:13.160 --> 0:43:16.120
<v Speaker 10>like you know, you hear about companies being formed in

0:43:16.160 --> 0:43:18.680
<v Speaker 10>the last week or so with illustrious names. They don't

0:43:18.719 --> 0:43:21.360
<v Speaker 10>have a business model defined yet, but people are planking

0:43:22.040 --> 0:43:24.200
<v Speaker 10>billions of dollars in their fundraise just because of the

0:43:24.239 --> 0:43:26.919
<v Speaker 10>pedigree of some of these individuals, and not to take

0:43:26.960 --> 0:43:30.800
<v Speaker 10>anything away from them, this is a classical hype cycle

0:43:30.960 --> 0:43:35.160
<v Speaker 10>where anything ai especially when you're talking about llms, if

0:43:35.200 --> 0:43:38.799
<v Speaker 10>you're talking about big data centers. The amount of money

0:43:38.840 --> 0:43:42.160
<v Speaker 10>being poured into this is crazy. Now, will it have

0:43:42.239 --> 0:43:44.640
<v Speaker 10>its value, of course it will, but it will not

0:43:44.719 --> 0:43:47.879
<v Speaker 10>be commensurate with the expectations that are being created right now.

0:43:49.520 --> 0:43:54.200
<v Speaker 3>Wait, so, okay, is it just because it's not there

0:43:54.360 --> 0:43:57.520
<v Speaker 3>yet and that the hype will become a reality in

0:43:57.800 --> 0:43:59.399
<v Speaker 3>maybe two years or.

0:43:59.320 --> 0:44:02.480
<v Speaker 6>Is it that the high just hype and you are

0:44:02.600 --> 0:44:03.600
<v Speaker 6>the two factors.

0:44:03.880 --> 0:44:07.160
<v Speaker 10>Yeah, so it's a very good question. I still maintain

0:44:07.239 --> 0:44:12.160
<v Speaker 10>that the value that these technologies will provide are absolutely insane,

0:44:12.920 --> 0:44:14.920
<v Speaker 10>even for the things our own engineers build. When I

0:44:14.920 --> 0:44:18.279
<v Speaker 10>get to play with them, I'm like, holy whatever, this

0:44:18.520 --> 0:44:21.280
<v Speaker 10>is great. Sorry for that.

0:44:21.280 --> 0:44:21.480
<v Speaker 8>That's it.

0:44:21.600 --> 0:44:24.920
<v Speaker 10>But my belief is that a lot of these technologies

0:44:25.000 --> 0:44:29.040
<v Speaker 10>will become commonplace. They'll become commoditized, So expecting people to

0:44:29.080 --> 0:44:32.719
<v Speaker 10>pay premium prices is going to be a chimera. People

0:44:32.760 --> 0:44:34.920
<v Speaker 10>will say, hey, I get it from this vendor and

0:44:34.920 --> 0:44:36.879
<v Speaker 10>that vendor, so why are you charging me extra? Four

0:44:36.920 --> 0:44:38.879
<v Speaker 10>dollars six dollars eight dollars by use it per month.

0:44:39.320 --> 0:44:43.880
<v Speaker 10>That will go away. But also the expectation that customers

0:44:43.920 --> 0:44:47.120
<v Speaker 10>are having about AI delivering and being a panacea for

0:44:47.280 --> 0:44:50.160
<v Speaker 10>all the problems they're dealing with without human interaction or

0:44:50.200 --> 0:44:53.359
<v Speaker 10>the classical word is AGI. We are years and years

0:44:53.360 --> 0:44:55.800
<v Speaker 10>away from that. So that is where the hype cycle

0:44:56.120 --> 0:44:58.440
<v Speaker 10>and the gap between what we deliver is very high.

0:44:58.480 --> 0:45:02.839
<v Speaker 10>Ist what I'm alluding to. But I think this technology

0:45:03.080 --> 0:45:05.160
<v Speaker 10>is here to stay. I mean, Web three oh has

0:45:05.200 --> 0:45:07.960
<v Speaker 10>its renaissance. You can see the cryptos back again with

0:45:08.000 --> 0:45:10.960
<v Speaker 10>the vengeance. So I'm saying that AI will be there

0:45:11.080 --> 0:45:15.840
<v Speaker 10>generated AI, but the value hype versus the value delivery,

0:45:15.920 --> 0:45:20.319
<v Speaker 10>that gap will diminish. And also the price expectation we

0:45:20.400 --> 0:45:22.640
<v Speaker 10>have as vendors that you'll pay me this much. We'll

0:45:22.640 --> 0:45:25.520
<v Speaker 10>have to get grounded into reality that people will pay

0:45:25.880 --> 0:45:28.400
<v Speaker 10>but not as what we're expecting. So all the investments

0:45:28.440 --> 0:45:31.080
<v Speaker 10>we are making right now in order to get the return,

0:45:31.440 --> 0:45:34.040
<v Speaker 10>there'll be some let's say, realignment.

0:45:34.560 --> 0:45:39.879
<v Speaker 4>What makes you say that we're so far from AGI.

0:45:40.640 --> 0:45:48.399
<v Speaker 10>You know, expecting very simply stated, having technology today which

0:45:48.440 --> 0:45:52.360
<v Speaker 10>can reduce the human interaction for low level task in

0:45:52.440 --> 0:45:56.759
<v Speaker 10>accounting or generating memos or creating a media brief or

0:45:56.760 --> 0:46:01.040
<v Speaker 10>even an advertisement that's there, but having it to the

0:46:01.080 --> 0:46:04.480
<v Speaker 10>point where no human curation is needed or human interaction

0:46:04.560 --> 0:46:07.759
<v Speaker 10>is needed, and have the faith and belief between you

0:46:07.840 --> 0:46:10.840
<v Speaker 10>as a provider to say I can just let the

0:46:10.920 --> 0:46:15.920
<v Speaker 10>machine or the GENAI capability deliver the end product that

0:46:16.080 --> 0:46:18.120
<v Speaker 10>is not going to be there. It's not there today,

0:46:18.200 --> 0:46:20.360
<v Speaker 10>it won't be there for a long time. So lights

0:46:20.400 --> 0:46:23.680
<v Speaker 10>out automation is possible in certain industries, but for the

0:46:23.760 --> 0:46:26.560
<v Speaker 10>kind of things I'm talking about, where can you invent

0:46:27.320 --> 0:46:32.200
<v Speaker 10>or have a protein marker for some disease, run through

0:46:32.320 --> 0:46:34.919
<v Speaker 10>a complete AI related pipeline and not have a human

0:46:34.960 --> 0:46:38.160
<v Speaker 10>intervened impossible. Of course, there'll be clinical trials for that.

0:46:38.480 --> 0:46:41.120
<v Speaker 10>But even in our world of software, I don't think

0:46:41.120 --> 0:46:43.000
<v Speaker 10>our software is at a point today or two years

0:46:43.040 --> 0:46:45.200
<v Speaker 10>from now where somebody could say, let's use the soft

0:46:45.320 --> 0:46:48.280
<v Speaker 10>software and let it solve the problem the complete workflow

0:46:48.480 --> 0:46:51.000
<v Speaker 10>with no human looking into it. So that's my reference

0:46:51.000 --> 0:46:51.600
<v Speaker 10>about AGI.

0:46:51.680 --> 0:46:54.080
<v Speaker 3>To be honest, Hey, listen, I really appreciate this, We

0:46:54.160 --> 0:46:54.960
<v Speaker 3>really appreciate this.

0:46:55.040 --> 0:46:57.640
<v Speaker 6>I'm getting your perspective. And one last question, then.

0:46:57.520 --> 0:47:01.919
<v Speaker 3>So if everything may take a few years to work

0:47:01.960 --> 0:47:05.080
<v Speaker 3>out in terms of the investments that have gone into

0:47:05.640 --> 0:47:10.120
<v Speaker 3>an Nvidia and others. Is it a case that that

0:47:10.200 --> 0:47:12.640
<v Speaker 3>may not make sense or that will make sense because

0:47:12.680 --> 0:47:15.400
<v Speaker 3>that's part of the infrastructure build that will still be

0:47:15.480 --> 0:47:18.280
<v Speaker 3>there in years to come. But whether it's an open

0:47:18.320 --> 0:47:21.799
<v Speaker 3>AI or someone else who leads in this what you

0:47:21.840 --> 0:47:25.960
<v Speaker 3>say might be a commoditized business going forward, that's TBD

0:47:26.200 --> 0:47:27.040
<v Speaker 3>to be determined.

0:47:28.320 --> 0:47:29.920
<v Speaker 10>Yeah, you know, this is a little bit about my

0:47:29.960 --> 0:47:32.480
<v Speaker 10>pay grade because you're bringing into the fix and shovel

0:47:32.520 --> 0:47:35.520
<v Speaker 10>business of Nvidia versus you know, the gold yeah from

0:47:35.560 --> 0:47:39.840
<v Speaker 10>the other guy. The relevance of Nvidia, I don't see diminishing,

0:47:39.880 --> 0:47:42.080
<v Speaker 10>except that they will be more competitors. It's a nature

0:47:42.120 --> 0:47:44.040
<v Speaker 10>of the beast, right, they cannot have this market all

0:47:44.080 --> 0:47:48.040
<v Speaker 10>to themselves. But also the providers, whether it's you say,

0:47:48.040 --> 0:47:51.080
<v Speaker 10>open AI or Anthropic or Mistral or so many of

0:47:51.200 --> 0:47:55.640
<v Speaker 10>their Google Gemini, they will of course keep up leveling

0:47:55.719 --> 0:47:59.319
<v Speaker 10>the value delivery of what they're providing or the value

0:47:59.360 --> 0:48:02.440
<v Speaker 10>chain of what they're doing livering. But a lot of

0:48:02.560 --> 0:48:06.920
<v Speaker 10>technology that they are investing in today compared to what

0:48:06.960 --> 0:48:09.320
<v Speaker 10>the other party is developing, they'll become almost similar and

0:48:09.320 --> 0:48:13.160
<v Speaker 10>therefore commoditized. So the arms raised to be the best

0:48:13.160 --> 0:48:17.080
<v Speaker 10>of providing the best LLM. That's going to be very expensive,

0:48:17.560 --> 0:48:20.800
<v Speaker 10>and at some point there'll be some I keep scrambling

0:48:20.800 --> 0:48:23.360
<v Speaker 10>for the right word, there'll be some realignment or readjustment

0:48:23.400 --> 0:48:25.719
<v Speaker 10>on expectations, even from the investor perspective.

0:48:26.719 --> 0:48:29.480
<v Speaker 4>Hey, Carol said it was the last question. But I

0:48:29.560 --> 0:48:31.040
<v Speaker 4>can't come on our air and I can't ask you

0:48:31.040 --> 0:48:32.720
<v Speaker 4>this question. When's the IPO happening?

0:48:33.880 --> 0:48:39.480
<v Speaker 10>I can go there, I can't, Well, you could. One

0:48:39.480 --> 0:48:42.160
<v Speaker 10>thing I can say is I've done this company very

0:48:42.160 --> 0:48:45.279
<v Speaker 10>differently coming from the valley. So you mentioned I've raised

0:48:45.280 --> 0:48:47.440
<v Speaker 10>one hundred and forty two million, but also I would

0:48:47.480 --> 0:48:50.600
<v Speaker 10>like to add the last round came in twenty eighteen.

0:48:50.920 --> 0:48:55.319
<v Speaker 10>Any raised, Yeah, and we don't plan to raise any

0:48:56.000 --> 0:48:58.440
<v Speaker 10>private financing in that way because we have been cash

0:48:58.480 --> 0:49:01.640
<v Speaker 10>flow positive with improving EBIT margins. But at the same time,

0:49:02.360 --> 0:49:05.080
<v Speaker 10>I take a lot of pride in saying that I've

0:49:05.120 --> 0:49:08.600
<v Speaker 10>never built a company which is insanely high growth with

0:49:08.719 --> 0:49:11.920
<v Speaker 10>insanely high losses. The very high losses, it's predictable, durable

0:49:11.960 --> 0:49:16.640
<v Speaker 10>growth with improving cash flow mechanics, improving even the margin,

0:49:16.719 --> 0:49:20.640
<v Speaker 10>so more sustainable and hopefully the markets will reward us

0:49:21.040 --> 0:49:23.919
<v Speaker 10>in whatever the outcome is, IPO being one of them.

0:49:24.239 --> 0:49:28.200
<v Speaker 3>Well, we certainly appreciate your time and the expertise and

0:49:28.640 --> 0:49:31.279
<v Speaker 3>kind of industry knowledge that comes with thirty years in

0:49:31.320 --> 0:49:32.040
<v Speaker 3>Silicon Valley.

0:49:32.440 --> 0:49:33.160
<v Speaker 6>Thank you so much.

0:49:33.239 --> 0:49:36.640
<v Speaker 3>Vanite Jane, co founder and CEO of Ignite, joining us

0:49:36.680 --> 0:49:38.000
<v Speaker 3>there from Mountain View, California.

0:49:38.040 --> 0:49:38.640
<v Speaker 6>In the thick of it.

0:49:38.960 --> 0:49:40.560
<v Speaker 4>Hey, we're in the thick of it when it comes

0:49:40.560 --> 0:49:42.439
<v Speaker 4>to the trade. Today, we got about twenty minutes until

0:49:42.480 --> 0:49:45.040
<v Speaker 4>the closed. The Nasdaq flat right now, so we're off

0:49:45.040 --> 0:49:47.680
<v Speaker 4>our best sessions, best levels of the day during this session.

0:49:47.719 --> 0:49:50.239
<v Speaker 4>The S and P five hundred of about two tenths

0:49:50.239 --> 0:49:52.880
<v Speaker 4>of one percent as we speak, while the Dow is

0:49:52.960 --> 0:49:54.680
<v Speaker 4>up one tenth of one percent.

0:49:54.840 --> 0:49:56.680
<v Speaker 3>All right, I am curious to see what our next

0:49:56.680 --> 0:49:58.440
<v Speaker 3>guest has to say, especially when it comes to the

0:49:58.440 --> 0:50:01.000
<v Speaker 3>semi space. Take a name like Tell was up sixteen

0:50:01.000 --> 0:50:04.600
<v Speaker 3>percent yesterday, down six percent today. It's an area he

0:50:04.640 --> 0:50:07.040
<v Speaker 3>certainly has been looking at. JJ Kinahan is back with

0:50:07.080 --> 0:50:10.640
<v Speaker 3>the CEO of Tasty Trade at IG, joining us from Chicago.

0:50:11.120 --> 0:50:11.400
<v Speaker 6>JJ.

0:50:11.520 --> 0:50:14.479
<v Speaker 3>Good to have you here, well, great to have you here.

0:50:14.760 --> 0:50:18.960
<v Speaker 3>Let's start big broad and macro in terms of the environment.

0:50:19.760 --> 0:50:20.879
<v Speaker 3>How do you see it right now?

0:50:22.360 --> 0:50:24.600
<v Speaker 12>Well, you know, obviously when you're at all time highs,

0:50:24.680 --> 0:50:27.799
<v Speaker 12>it's something that it continues to be a market that

0:50:27.840 --> 0:50:30.200
<v Speaker 12>people look for bad news and you can get it

0:50:30.280 --> 0:50:33.240
<v Speaker 12>pointed out all day long. Yet the market just seems

0:50:33.280 --> 0:50:37.040
<v Speaker 12>to be resilient and continues to just go higher and hire.

0:50:37.440 --> 0:50:40.400
<v Speaker 12>I thought it was a real maybe breath of fresh

0:50:40.400 --> 0:50:44.360
<v Speaker 12>air and encouraging for retail investors today when in the

0:50:44.400 --> 0:50:46.560
<v Speaker 12>FED notes they said, well, we're really not sure what's

0:50:46.600 --> 0:50:48.920
<v Speaker 12>going to happen with the tariffs and what effect that

0:50:48.960 --> 0:50:51.600
<v Speaker 12>will have on the economy, And I think that it's like,

0:50:51.719 --> 0:50:55.200
<v Speaker 12>while you're just expressing what really everybody else seems to

0:50:55.200 --> 0:50:57.680
<v Speaker 12>be saying. But in the meantime, you know, I look

0:50:57.719 --> 0:51:00.840
<v Speaker 12>at our clients, they continue to just buy the market.

0:51:00.920 --> 0:51:04.240
<v Speaker 12>It's interesting. One of the stocks that they've come back

0:51:04.280 --> 0:51:07.319
<v Speaker 12>to after sort of maybe not being a bit out

0:51:07.360 --> 0:51:10.000
<v Speaker 12>of favor, if you will, until the last couple of

0:51:10.000 --> 0:51:12.440
<v Speaker 12>weeks where we've seen you know, almost eighty percent of

0:51:12.440 --> 0:51:15.840
<v Speaker 12>the activity be bullish is actually Apple not quite a semiconductor,

0:51:16.200 --> 0:51:19.760
<v Speaker 12>but of course one that's been a lot of people's portfolios,

0:51:20.160 --> 0:51:22.400
<v Speaker 12>not maybe as much of a traded stock as it

0:51:22.440 --> 0:51:25.399
<v Speaker 12>is just an investing stock. And it's really interesting how

0:51:25.440 --> 0:51:29.360
<v Speaker 12>the buying there has picked up pretty significantly over the

0:51:29.440 --> 0:51:31.919
<v Speaker 12>last few weeks, when some of the other Magnificent seven

0:51:31.960 --> 0:51:33.040
<v Speaker 12>haven't been quite as interesting.

0:51:33.200 --> 0:51:36.840
<v Speaker 4>Okay, we're talking in Nvidia, we talked meta platforms. You

0:51:36.920 --> 0:51:41.520
<v Speaker 4>mentioned Apple JJ. Caterpillar is an interesting name on your list.

0:51:41.600 --> 0:51:43.520
<v Speaker 4>Your clients are bullish on cat. What's going on?

0:51:43.800 --> 0:51:47.040
<v Speaker 12>Yeah, that's really not a name we talk about very often,

0:51:47.160 --> 0:51:48.880
<v Speaker 12>is it. So you know, a stock that's had a

0:51:48.880 --> 0:51:52.160
<v Speaker 12>little bit of trouble and kind of turning things back

0:51:52.200 --> 0:51:56.040
<v Speaker 12>around the other way. And so with that one again,

0:51:56.160 --> 0:52:01.200
<v Speaker 12>maybe a bit also of a vote that we're going

0:52:01.280 --> 0:52:05.520
<v Speaker 12>to continue with a lot of these infrastructure plays with

0:52:04.440 --> 0:52:08.879
<v Speaker 12>the new president, et cetera. So all that I think

0:52:08.960 --> 0:52:11.040
<v Speaker 12>is adding up to this. Again, when I see a

0:52:11.120 --> 0:52:15.320
<v Speaker 12>name like Caterpillar on our list of most bullish stocks,

0:52:15.520 --> 0:52:18.319
<v Speaker 12>the one thing that does make me happy about that

0:52:18.840 --> 0:52:22.319
<v Speaker 12>is it shows that we're continuing to spread out from

0:52:22.600 --> 0:52:24.680
<v Speaker 12>just the mag seven. If you think about a year

0:52:24.680 --> 0:52:26.640
<v Speaker 12>ago when we were talking about these rallies, we were

0:52:26.680 --> 0:52:29.880
<v Speaker 12>talking about primarily the mag seven stocks. Now you're talking

0:52:29.920 --> 0:52:33.200
<v Speaker 12>about a lot more stocks being involved, and let's face it,

0:52:33.239 --> 0:52:37.840
<v Speaker 12>the average retail trader, not necessarily Caterpillar making the list

0:52:37.960 --> 0:52:41.120
<v Speaker 12>of good volumes and people having a high interest in it.

0:52:42.239 --> 0:52:46.560
<v Speaker 3>All right, so names another name you don't like Starbucks,

0:52:46.600 --> 0:52:48.520
<v Speaker 3>which we know who has a new CEO.

0:52:48.840 --> 0:52:50.200
<v Speaker 4>I don't know if he doesn't like them.

0:52:52.000 --> 0:52:53.800
<v Speaker 6>Do you buy coffee from Starbucks?

0:52:53.840 --> 0:52:56.760
<v Speaker 12>I'm drinking, I have a cup here as we speak.

0:52:56.840 --> 0:52:58.160
<v Speaker 4>Okay, all right, just check it out.

0:52:58.200 --> 0:53:00.440
<v Speaker 6>Wait, so do as I say, not as I do?

0:53:00.640 --> 0:53:01.439
<v Speaker 6>Is that kind of a thing.

0:53:01.840 --> 0:53:05.920
<v Speaker 3>So Starbucks, we know, high profile CEO came from Chipotle,

0:53:06.400 --> 0:53:09.000
<v Speaker 3>Brian Nicol. We've talked to him a lot, was really

0:53:09.040 --> 0:53:12.439
<v Speaker 3>instrumental in terms of driving growth, getting them focused on

0:53:13.000 --> 0:53:17.920
<v Speaker 3>the digital side of the business at Chipotle, now at Starbucks,

0:53:17.960 --> 0:53:20.799
<v Speaker 3>and he's making some changes. But you don't, you're not

0:53:20.920 --> 0:53:21.600
<v Speaker 3>so keen on it.

0:53:21.640 --> 0:53:22.040
<v Speaker 6>How come?

0:53:22.800 --> 0:53:24.880
<v Speaker 12>Well, I think we've seen an incredible run up in

0:53:24.880 --> 0:53:27.239
<v Speaker 12>the stock since he's been named CEO. Let's face it,

0:53:27.280 --> 0:53:30.880
<v Speaker 12>and you know, give credit where it's due. The anticipation

0:53:31.000 --> 0:53:33.000
<v Speaker 12>of what he was going to do, followed by you

0:53:33.080 --> 0:53:36.560
<v Speaker 12>know who doesn't love the ac DC thunderstruck as their

0:53:36.640 --> 0:53:41.720
<v Speaker 12>commercials and the brand new commercial. It's very catchy and narrowing.

0:53:41.760 --> 0:53:45.319
<v Speaker 12>The menu fantastic. But I think that there was this,

0:53:45.880 --> 0:53:49.239
<v Speaker 12>you know, sense as he took over people immediately. It

0:53:49.280 --> 0:53:52.480
<v Speaker 12>took a few weeks, but once some of the employee

0:53:52.520 --> 0:53:56.040
<v Speaker 12>issues that settled down, the stock pretty quickly followed suit.

0:53:56.080 --> 0:53:59.040
<v Speaker 12>In anticipation of this. Now it's a matter of okay,

0:53:59.239 --> 0:54:02.920
<v Speaker 12>will the execution all the way down the line follow

0:54:03.280 --> 0:54:06.279
<v Speaker 12>what's going to happen with the announcements and with them

0:54:06.280 --> 0:54:10.719
<v Speaker 12>trying to do this obviously incredibly successful ceo where he's

0:54:10.760 --> 0:54:13.480
<v Speaker 12>been in the past, can he take that magic again?

0:54:13.800 --> 0:54:17.239
<v Speaker 12>We saw them talking about opening five hundred news stores yesterday,

0:54:17.600 --> 0:54:20.520
<v Speaker 12>so again there is a lot perhaps to like there.

0:54:20.800 --> 0:54:24.279
<v Speaker 12>But I also think that when you have this kind

0:54:24.280 --> 0:54:27.160
<v Speaker 12>of run, you're at an all time high in the market,

0:54:27.360 --> 0:54:29.960
<v Speaker 12>what people start to look for is, okay, those that

0:54:30.000 --> 0:54:32.960
<v Speaker 12>have run, maybe time to let lighten up, or even

0:54:33.000 --> 0:54:35.480
<v Speaker 12>to take the other side of and look for some

0:54:35.520 --> 0:54:37.799
<v Speaker 12>of the more beaten down stocks or stocks that have

0:54:37.880 --> 0:54:41.719
<v Speaker 12>had trouble participating in this upward move. And again, Starbucks

0:54:41.760 --> 0:54:43.520
<v Speaker 12>has had a pretty good run for the last four

0:54:43.560 --> 0:54:44.160
<v Speaker 12>or five months.

0:54:44.239 --> 0:54:46.840
<v Speaker 4>Hey JJ, a member of the Bloomberg Business week audience

0:54:46.840 --> 0:54:49.759
<v Speaker 4>getting in touch. He wants to know about a view

0:54:49.920 --> 0:54:54.359
<v Speaker 4>on equities moving forward. Given we're likely going to see

0:54:54.440 --> 0:54:58.200
<v Speaker 4>government layoffs, Inflation, as the Federal Reserve has said, is

0:54:58.400 --> 0:55:01.400
<v Speaker 4>sticky consumer that is weakening.

0:55:01.680 --> 0:55:05.239
<v Speaker 12>What do you see. I still see US equities as

0:55:05.280 --> 0:55:08.719
<v Speaker 12>the best game in the world, so to speak. So

0:55:08.920 --> 0:55:10.960
<v Speaker 12>people are going to have to put their money somewhere

0:55:11.000 --> 0:55:13.520
<v Speaker 12>and they're always going to be looking for return. So,

0:55:13.719 --> 0:55:17.960
<v Speaker 12>you know, I've just returned from some overseas trips and

0:55:18.000 --> 0:55:22.080
<v Speaker 12>it really is amazing to me how everyone is looking

0:55:22.120 --> 0:55:25.080
<v Speaker 12>to get their money into the US to be part

0:55:25.160 --> 0:55:28.680
<v Speaker 12>of the US markets. Right now, we see inflation all

0:55:28.719 --> 0:55:32.600
<v Speaker 12>of you know, in different spots of the world, creeping up,

0:55:32.640 --> 0:55:35.120
<v Speaker 12>if you will. I think the part that is going

0:55:35.160 --> 0:55:37.239
<v Speaker 12>to be the most interesting is going to be the

0:55:37.400 --> 0:55:39.600
<v Speaker 12>terrific side of this and what's going to be the

0:55:39.640 --> 0:55:41.920
<v Speaker 12>longer term effect in terms of costs. You know, you

0:55:42.000 --> 0:55:44.520
<v Speaker 12>had some of the housing stocks released this morning and

0:55:44.520 --> 0:55:47.640
<v Speaker 12>some of their fears around what this could mean for

0:55:48.440 --> 0:55:51.520
<v Speaker 12>the cost of housing, particularly brand new housing, and how

0:55:51.560 --> 0:55:54.799
<v Speaker 12>so many of them had to give away already incentives

0:55:54.840 --> 0:55:57.120
<v Speaker 12>to get the houses sold. What does that mean at

0:55:57.120 --> 0:56:00.160
<v Speaker 12>the price of lumber and steal, and even things like

0:56:00.239 --> 0:56:02.839
<v Speaker 12>insulation goes up in the future, that's going to make

0:56:02.880 --> 0:56:06.319
<v Speaker 12>it much more difficult. But with all that said, when

0:56:06.320 --> 0:56:08.600
<v Speaker 12>I look around the rest of the world and the competition,

0:56:09.080 --> 0:56:11.440
<v Speaker 12>there isn't much else that is competing with that on

0:56:11.560 --> 0:56:14.319
<v Speaker 12>a worldwide scale, So it still seems to be the

0:56:14.360 --> 0:56:17.479
<v Speaker 12>best best bet in town, if you will.

0:56:17.600 --> 0:56:17.799
<v Speaker 8>Well.

0:56:17.800 --> 0:56:21.319
<v Speaker 3>But just to the point that our listener sent in

0:56:21.760 --> 0:56:24.120
<v Speaker 3>his question, I mean, if you look at the MSCI

0:56:24.400 --> 0:56:27.759
<v Speaker 3>World x US Index, so take out the United States,

0:56:27.920 --> 0:56:31.040
<v Speaker 3>it's up more than seven percent, seven point four. If

0:56:31.080 --> 0:56:34.279
<v Speaker 3>I look at MSCI World INDECKS, which includes the US,

0:56:34.360 --> 0:56:36.640
<v Speaker 3>it's up about five percent s and p's up about

0:56:36.640 --> 0:56:39.360
<v Speaker 3>four percent. So we know, we've all been talking about

0:56:39.360 --> 0:56:41.440
<v Speaker 3>the start to the year where markets outside of the

0:56:41.520 --> 0:56:44.319
<v Speaker 3>United States are outperforming, and maybe it's a case of

0:56:44.360 --> 0:56:46.799
<v Speaker 3>just they've been so beaten down, so undervalued. But you

0:56:46.840 --> 0:56:50.440
<v Speaker 3>don't think that trade continues, that outperformance continues.

0:56:51.400 --> 0:56:53.720
<v Speaker 12>I think it's the more we start to see tariffs

0:56:53.800 --> 0:56:56.479
<v Speaker 12>come up, the more we start to see inflationary pressures rise,

0:56:56.760 --> 0:56:58.520
<v Speaker 12>the harder it gets on the rest of the world.

0:56:58.520 --> 0:57:03.280
<v Speaker 12>In my opinion, because of the you know, to your point,

0:57:03.560 --> 0:57:05.960
<v Speaker 12>some of This, I think is people who are like, Okay,

0:57:06.200 --> 0:57:08.840
<v Speaker 12>where can I go next? Just as I talked about

0:57:09.320 --> 0:57:13.200
<v Speaker 12>the US market expanding out from the Magnificent seven. To me,

0:57:13.320 --> 0:57:17.520
<v Speaker 12>the natural derivative of that is to say, what other

0:57:17.600 --> 0:57:20.080
<v Speaker 12>markets can I go to that have been beaten up?

0:57:20.520 --> 0:57:24.520
<v Speaker 12>But in my experience what happens is those markets that

0:57:24.680 --> 0:57:28.120
<v Speaker 12>tend to go up very quickly, especially if you believe

0:57:28.200 --> 0:57:31.480
<v Speaker 12>that you know, the rally may be pausing for a

0:57:31.520 --> 0:57:34.280
<v Speaker 12>while or correcting for a while, they tend to go

0:57:34.360 --> 0:57:37.120
<v Speaker 12>the other way very quickly. Also in our perform on

0:57:37.160 --> 0:57:39.840
<v Speaker 12>the downside as well as the upside. That's not to

0:57:39.880 --> 0:57:42.360
<v Speaker 12>say that you can't get better returned, but I do

0:57:42.400 --> 0:57:44.960
<v Speaker 12>think you have to take into the account. What's the

0:57:45.080 --> 0:57:48.760
<v Speaker 12>volatility you're going to take in by doing that, in

0:57:48.800 --> 0:57:51.360
<v Speaker 12>my opinion's much higher almost everywhere else in the world

0:57:51.400 --> 0:57:52.520
<v Speaker 12>than it is in the US right now.

0:57:52.560 --> 0:57:55.760
<v Speaker 4>What's the biggest risk that the market faces right now?

0:57:55.760 --> 0:57:57.479
<v Speaker 4>I mean, we're I don't want to say we price

0:57:57.520 --> 0:57:59.440
<v Speaker 4>for perfection, because who knows if that's the case, but

0:57:59.520 --> 0:58:02.800
<v Speaker 4>we are hovering around records. What's what what could derail

0:58:02.840 --> 0:58:03.400
<v Speaker 4>this rally?

0:58:04.240 --> 0:58:04.479
<v Speaker 7>Well?

0:58:04.520 --> 0:58:08.720
<v Speaker 12>I think the you know, the fear of the fear

0:58:08.760 --> 0:58:11.920
<v Speaker 12>of the unknown is always out there. Of course, it

0:58:12.040 --> 0:58:17.000
<v Speaker 12>really does seem amazing that we've been able to quell

0:58:17.160 --> 0:58:22.280
<v Speaker 12>some of the uh you know, countries having issues, which

0:58:22.320 --> 0:58:25.640
<v Speaker 12>makes me think that inflation is going to be the

0:58:25.800 --> 0:58:28.720
<v Speaker 12>number one thing that we're going to have a problem

0:58:28.760 --> 0:58:32.240
<v Speaker 12>with because as you also mentioned, yes, there does appear

0:58:32.280 --> 0:58:35.920
<v Speaker 12>to be not only government uh employment maybe in question.

0:58:36.200 --> 0:58:38.560
<v Speaker 12>But let's face it, I think that what you're starting

0:58:38.560 --> 0:58:42.640
<v Speaker 12>to see from starting with technology companies is do we

0:58:42.720 --> 0:58:45.560
<v Speaker 12>need as many people as we used to, particularly as

0:58:45.640 --> 0:58:48.920
<v Speaker 12>AI comes into use. And I'm not ripping AI is

0:58:49.040 --> 0:58:53.280
<v Speaker 12>taking away jobs, but every time we've seen new technology

0:58:53.400 --> 0:58:55.800
<v Speaker 12>in the short term it does take away jobs and

0:58:55.840 --> 0:58:59.720
<v Speaker 12>in the long term it expands jobs significantly, but where

0:58:59.720 --> 0:59:02.000
<v Speaker 12>at a point where we may see higher costs for

0:59:02.080 --> 0:59:04.880
<v Speaker 12>things at the same time some job being eliminated, and

0:59:04.920 --> 0:59:10.320
<v Speaker 12>so that combination I think does have an opportunity to

0:59:10.400 --> 0:59:14.240
<v Speaker 12>slow the economy down pretty significantly. And as we all know,

0:59:14.360 --> 0:59:17.080
<v Speaker 12>you know the Mike Tyson line, the thing that knocks

0:59:17.200 --> 0:59:18.960
<v Speaker 12>the punch of knocks you out is the one you

0:59:19.040 --> 0:59:21.919
<v Speaker 12>don't see. So who knows what else could be out there?

0:59:22.920 --> 0:59:24.680
<v Speaker 3>Hey, one name that we often spend a lot of

0:59:24.680 --> 0:59:27.040
<v Speaker 3>time talking about and I just want to go back

0:59:27.040 --> 0:59:30.120
<v Speaker 3>to we know we talked about the mag seven Apple

0:59:30.160 --> 0:59:32.360
<v Speaker 3>and I'm just looking at it's just a little changed

0:59:32.440 --> 0:59:35.440
<v Speaker 3>on the day new phone that came out today. It's

0:59:35.440 --> 0:59:38.280
<v Speaker 3>down about two percent for the year overall. But when

0:59:38.320 --> 0:59:41.800
<v Speaker 3>it comes to Apple, you're bullish on Apple. What in

0:59:41.800 --> 0:59:44.560
<v Speaker 3>particular are the catalysts or is it just a continuation

0:59:45.360 --> 0:59:48.400
<v Speaker 3>of what they're known for, or is there something in particular.

0:59:48.440 --> 0:59:49.480
<v Speaker 6>The iPhone sixteen E.

0:59:49.640 --> 0:59:52.800
<v Speaker 3>Available in white and black starting at five ninety nine,

0:59:53.600 --> 0:59:55.080
<v Speaker 3>available starting February twenty eight.

0:59:55.120 --> 0:59:58.640
<v Speaker 6>That's the headlines. I mean, our Mark Herman hasn't very thanks, Okay,

0:59:58.840 --> 0:59:59.880
<v Speaker 6>I thought I was hearing a.

1:00:01.440 --> 1:00:03.760
<v Speaker 3>Brought to you by anyway, but no, we've been waiting

1:00:03.800 --> 1:00:05.640
<v Speaker 3>for this and our Mark German has been talking about

1:00:05.680 --> 1:00:07.000
<v Speaker 3>it a lot. And so that was just some of

1:00:07.040 --> 1:00:10.520
<v Speaker 3>the headlines that came out late morning. What is it

1:00:10.520 --> 1:00:11.120
<v Speaker 3>about Apple?

1:00:11.880 --> 1:00:14.000
<v Speaker 12>So you know what's really interesting if I look at Apple.

1:00:14.680 --> 1:00:16.360
<v Speaker 12>Let's back up a little bit. Let's talk about Apple

1:00:16.400 --> 1:00:17.680
<v Speaker 12>over the last two years for a second, if you

1:00:17.720 --> 1:00:20.480
<v Speaker 12>don't mind, so think about it, maybe even more maybe

1:00:20.520 --> 1:00:22.720
<v Speaker 12>spears think about that whole by the dip mentality that

1:00:22.760 --> 1:00:25.200
<v Speaker 12>we all experienced for a year and a half or so.

1:00:25.720 --> 1:00:28.080
<v Speaker 12>Apple was the first stock that by the dip started

1:00:28.120 --> 1:00:31.560
<v Speaker 12>with and everybody's like Apple, Apple, Apple. What happened over

1:00:31.560 --> 1:00:35.280
<v Speaker 12>the last six to nine months, Apple kind of fell

1:00:35.280 --> 1:00:37.120
<v Speaker 12>out of favor a lot more with the retail investor,

1:00:37.160 --> 1:00:39.320
<v Speaker 12>which is really interesting, and it had never experienced anything

1:00:39.360 --> 1:00:41.320
<v Speaker 12>like that, since it's become more of a you know,

1:00:41.400 --> 1:00:44.680
<v Speaker 12>quote unquote major stock, and so that had switched over

1:00:44.720 --> 1:00:47.880
<v Speaker 12>to Microsoft as the company people bought first whenever there

1:00:47.960 --> 1:00:51.000
<v Speaker 12>was times of trouble. Now we're seeing a lot of

1:00:51.000 --> 1:00:53.040
<v Speaker 12>different stocks. You know, when Tesla had the big sell

1:00:53.080 --> 1:00:56.000
<v Speaker 12>off a few weeks ago, Netflix, we're seeing that the

1:00:56.120 --> 1:00:59.360
<v Speaker 12>times that retail investors will step in and buy stocks

1:00:59.440 --> 1:01:01.800
<v Speaker 12>like that, that or trusted. I think what's happened to

1:01:01.840 --> 1:01:04.960
<v Speaker 12>Apple over the last four months is kind of where

1:01:05.000 --> 1:01:07.120
<v Speaker 12>we started the segment. Okay, we're right in your all

1:01:07.160 --> 1:01:10.440
<v Speaker 12>time highs. What could upset us overall? And so I

1:01:10.440 --> 1:01:12.880
<v Speaker 12>think one of the reasons that people have become more

1:01:12.920 --> 1:01:16.200
<v Speaker 12>attracted to Apple overall is exactly what you said, you

1:01:16.320 --> 1:01:18.360
<v Speaker 12>know what the products are. I don't think there's anything

1:01:18.680 --> 1:01:23.560
<v Speaker 12>that's so brand new, you know, yes, Ai, it's great

1:01:23.760 --> 1:01:26.160
<v Speaker 12>to have on there, et cetera. But I don't think

1:01:26.160 --> 1:01:29.360
<v Speaker 12>that's the primary reason people are buying their phones. They're

1:01:29.360 --> 1:01:31.960
<v Speaker 12>buying their phones because they know the reliability. They're buying

1:01:32.000 --> 1:01:34.960
<v Speaker 12>them because they know what they're getting overall, and when

1:01:35.000 --> 1:01:38.520
<v Speaker 12>people are unsure, they go to products they know, they

1:01:38.520 --> 1:01:41.080
<v Speaker 12>go to names they know. Apple is still a very

1:01:41.160 --> 1:01:44.200
<v Speaker 12>very trusted name by most people, and so there has

1:01:44.360 --> 1:01:48.280
<v Speaker 12>been I won't say that people have gotten more socious overall,

1:01:48.400 --> 1:01:49.800
<v Speaker 12>but toward that they have got.

1:01:49.600 --> 1:01:51.520
<v Speaker 3>Over or if they live in the master household and

1:01:51.600 --> 1:01:54.040
<v Speaker 3>their child of the master household, they don't have a

1:01:54.120 --> 1:01:58.919
<v Speaker 3>choice because it's an Apple household. If I found mine,

1:01:58.960 --> 1:02:01.680
<v Speaker 3>I found mine, but again it would be Apple. Yeah,

1:02:03.200 --> 1:02:05.240
<v Speaker 3>just saying this is what kind of happens you get

1:02:05.360 --> 1:02:06.760
<v Speaker 3>entrenched to within the network.

1:02:06.960 --> 1:02:07.240
<v Speaker 6>JJ.

1:02:07.320 --> 1:02:11.360
<v Speaker 3>Thanks Jjkinahan, Chief executive Officer, Tasty Trade and IG joining

1:02:11.440 --> 1:02:12.600
<v Speaker 3>us from Chicago.

1:02:13.480 --> 1:02:18.320
<v Speaker 2>This is the Bloomberg Business Week podcast, available on Apple, Spotify,

1:02:18.440 --> 1:02:22.120
<v Speaker 2>and anywhere else you get your podcasts. Listen live weekday

1:02:22.200 --> 1:02:26.200
<v Speaker 2>afternoons from two to five pm Eastern on Bloomberg dot Com,

1:02:26.240 --> 1:02:30.160
<v Speaker 2>the iHeartRadio app, tune In, and the Bloomberg Business App.

1:02:30.360 --> 1:02:33.200
<v Speaker 2>You can also watch us live every weekday on YouTube

1:02:33.360 --> 1:02:35.520
<v Speaker 2>and always on the Bloomberg Terminal