1 00:00:00,080 --> 00:00:03,640 Speaker 1: President Trump has made cracking down on illegal immigration a 2 00:00:03,720 --> 00:00:07,040 Speaker 1: hallmark of his administration. Now he's turning his attention to 3 00:00:07,120 --> 00:00:11,119 Speaker 1: legal immigration, putting his support behind legislation that would dramatically 4 00:00:11,160 --> 00:00:15,160 Speaker 1: cut legal immigration levels over the next decade and evaluate 5 00:00:15,320 --> 00:00:20,360 Speaker 1: visa applications on a points based merit system. This competitive 6 00:00:20,400 --> 00:00:26,080 Speaker 1: application process will favor applicants who can speak English, financially 7 00:00:26,120 --> 00:00:30,840 Speaker 1: support themselves and their families, and demonstrate skills that will 8 00:00:30,880 --> 00:00:35,880 Speaker 1: contribute to our economy. The bill was introduced by Republican 9 00:00:35,920 --> 00:00:39,720 Speaker 1: Senators David Purdue of Georgia and Tom Cotton of Arkansas 10 00:00:39,760 --> 00:00:43,040 Speaker 1: in February, but has gained little traction in the Senate. 11 00:00:43,400 --> 00:00:48,360 Speaker 1: Both Democrats and Republicans criticized it Yesterday. Republican Senator Lindsey 12 00:00:48,400 --> 00:00:52,720 Speaker 1: Graham of South Carolina said agriculture and tourism are the 13 00:00:52,760 --> 00:00:56,280 Speaker 1: top two industries in his state and rely on immigrants. 14 00:00:56,920 --> 00:00:58,880 Speaker 1: You just don't want every Green card holder to be 15 00:00:58,920 --> 00:01:02,320 Speaker 1: a computer engineer, because the the economy of America is 16 00:01:02,360 --> 00:01:05,479 Speaker 1: more than just computer and hot tay. The US Chamber 17 00:01:05,520 --> 00:01:08,720 Speaker 1: of Commerce is cutting legal immigration by half, as this 18 00:01:08,880 --> 00:01:12,360 Speaker 1: bill would do in about ten years, would do serious 19 00:01:12,440 --> 00:01:16,679 Speaker 1: damage to the economy. Joining me are Kevin Appleby, Senior 20 00:01:16,720 --> 00:01:20,600 Speaker 1: director of International Migration Policy at the Center for Migration Studies, 21 00:01:20,640 --> 00:01:24,760 Speaker 1: and David Beer, immigration policy analyst at the Cato Institute. 22 00:01:25,400 --> 00:01:29,920 Speaker 1: Kevin explained the changes to the immigration system that this 23 00:01:30,000 --> 00:01:36,520 Speaker 1: bill would enact well as was mentioned in the prologue there, 24 00:01:36,720 --> 00:01:40,680 Speaker 1: it would cut legal immigration or green card levels by 25 00:01:40,720 --> 00:01:44,840 Speaker 1: at least half, if not more, would would severely impact 26 00:01:45,080 --> 00:01:49,120 Speaker 1: of family units of family immigration as well as employment 27 00:01:49,440 --> 00:01:54,960 Speaker 1: um and would undercut, certainly undercut our economy growing going forward. 28 00:01:55,320 --> 00:01:59,440 Speaker 1: It also would reduce refugee admissions to fifty thousand, leaving 29 00:02:00,080 --> 00:02:02,520 Speaker 1: tens of thousands over the next several years in danger. 30 00:02:02,640 --> 00:02:05,400 Speaker 1: And it also eliminates a program called the Diversity Visa 31 00:02:05,440 --> 00:02:10,520 Speaker 1: Lottery program which is enacted in and it would allow 32 00:02:10,600 --> 00:02:14,040 Speaker 1: our immigrant population to be more diverse from countries that 33 00:02:14,520 --> 00:02:19,600 Speaker 1: otherwise wouldn't have that opportunity, David, do we heard Senator 34 00:02:19,760 --> 00:02:25,040 Speaker 1: Graham and immigration advocance also who criticized the proposal, saying 35 00:02:25,120 --> 00:02:29,880 Speaker 1: that slashing legal immigration would hurt industries such as agriculture 36 00:02:30,160 --> 00:02:34,240 Speaker 1: and harm the economy because it would result in labor 37 00:02:34,280 --> 00:02:38,799 Speaker 1: shortages in lower wage jobs that Americans generally don't want. 38 00:02:40,120 --> 00:02:44,239 Speaker 1: Do you agree with that. Yeah, absolutely, you think it's 39 00:02:44,360 --> 00:02:49,200 Speaker 1: just completely ignorant to believe that all the jobs in 40 00:02:49,200 --> 00:02:52,880 Speaker 1: the economy are going to be college educated, college degree 41 00:02:52,960 --> 00:02:56,400 Speaker 1: holding tight positions. If you get rid of all of 42 00:02:56,440 --> 00:03:01,440 Speaker 1: the uh maids and get of all the people working 43 00:03:01,440 --> 00:03:03,760 Speaker 1: in the back of the restaurant, someone's going to have 44 00:03:03,840 --> 00:03:07,560 Speaker 1: to fill those positions, and you're gonna be really downgrading 45 00:03:07,880 --> 00:03:13,360 Speaker 1: America's workforce. You're gonna start forcing Americans out of you know, 46 00:03:13,560 --> 00:03:17,760 Speaker 1: managerial positions and force them to the back of the restaurant, 47 00:03:18,040 --> 00:03:21,200 Speaker 1: require them to be the dishwasher. You're going to require 48 00:03:21,240 --> 00:03:23,880 Speaker 1: them to be the cook instead of the guy who's 49 00:03:23,960 --> 00:03:29,040 Speaker 1: running the business. And so really, the the motivation behind 50 00:03:29,639 --> 00:03:34,120 Speaker 1: having a system in which all immigrants are college degree 51 00:03:34,200 --> 00:03:39,360 Speaker 1: holders is really misplaced once you start thinking about how 52 00:03:39,400 --> 00:03:43,600 Speaker 1: it would actually play out in the real economy. Kevin, 53 00:03:43,840 --> 00:03:47,400 Speaker 1: can I can I quick just just tow two other 54 00:03:47,520 --> 00:03:51,960 Speaker 1: trends that really make this the wrong direction. Our population 55 00:03:52,080 --> 00:03:55,160 Speaker 1: is aging, and the number of US citizens will be 56 00:03:55,280 --> 00:03:58,720 Speaker 1: at retirement age will double untill over eighties seven million 57 00:03:58,840 --> 00:04:02,320 Speaker 1: by twenties six. And at the same time, our replacement 58 00:04:02,400 --> 00:04:06,119 Speaker 1: level we're barely at replacement level in terms of fertility rates. 59 00:04:06,200 --> 00:04:09,280 Speaker 1: So in terms of US citizen population, we're going to 60 00:04:09,360 --> 00:04:12,080 Speaker 1: see a gap moving forward, and that will leave a 61 00:04:12,080 --> 00:04:16,120 Speaker 1: big gap in the workforce as well. And I'll ask 62 00:04:16,200 --> 00:04:20,360 Speaker 1: this first of you, Kevin, is there any evidence to 63 00:04:20,480 --> 00:04:24,080 Speaker 1: support the idea that this is going to help the economy. 64 00:04:24,160 --> 00:04:28,200 Speaker 1: When Stephen Miller, the White House aid was asked this 65 00:04:28,320 --> 00:04:34,080 Speaker 1: yesterday his he had no response. Well, I mean, there 66 00:04:34,120 --> 00:04:37,200 Speaker 1: are a couple of studies that have been produced by 67 00:04:37,360 --> 00:04:41,599 Speaker 1: those who wrote this legislation, restrictionist groups like uh Fair 68 00:04:41,600 --> 00:04:46,240 Speaker 1: in Numbers USA who draw that conclusion, but more reputable 69 00:04:46,400 --> 00:04:49,039 Speaker 1: sources such as the National Academy of Sciences and even 70 00:04:49,040 --> 00:04:52,880 Speaker 1: the Cato Institute have found it then migrants complement the 71 00:04:52,960 --> 00:04:57,400 Speaker 1: US workforce and helped produce jobs immigrant workers over time, 72 00:04:57,800 --> 00:05:01,560 Speaker 1: and don't take jobs away for the vast majority of 73 00:05:01,680 --> 00:05:05,839 Speaker 1: US US citizens. So to say that it's really it's 74 00:05:05,920 --> 00:05:08,120 Speaker 1: it's based on the whole bill is really based on 75 00:05:08,160 --> 00:05:12,640 Speaker 1: a faulty premise, because that's really not the case. I've 76 00:05:12,640 --> 00:05:16,159 Speaker 1: been talking with Kevin Appleby, senior director of International Migration 77 00:05:16,240 --> 00:05:19,240 Speaker 1: Policy at the Center for Migration Studies, and David Beer, 78 00:05:19,320 --> 00:05:24,640 Speaker 1: immigration policy analysts at the Cato Institute, about the immigration 79 00:05:24,880 --> 00:05:28,960 Speaker 1: bill that President Trump is supporting. It was introduced originally 80 00:05:28,960 --> 00:05:34,240 Speaker 1: by two Republican senators in February, and this bill would 81 00:05:34,279 --> 00:05:38,119 Speaker 1: award points. It's a merit based system, award points based 82 00:05:38,160 --> 00:05:42,800 Speaker 1: on education, ability to speak English, high paying job offers, age, 83 00:05:42,960 --> 00:05:49,120 Speaker 1: record of achievement, and entrepreneurial initiative. David, it sounds so 84 00:05:49,480 --> 00:05:53,000 Speaker 1: fluid and unstructured, sort of like being graded in school. 85 00:05:53,080 --> 00:05:54,560 Speaker 1: You never know how the teacher is going to go. 86 00:05:55,080 --> 00:05:57,800 Speaker 1: How would like the record of achievement be measured? And 87 00:05:57,839 --> 00:06:02,600 Speaker 1: suppose you have an immigration officer grades on a curve. Well, 88 00:06:02,600 --> 00:06:07,039 Speaker 1: it's a really strange system. And um, it really should 89 00:06:07,080 --> 00:06:11,240 Speaker 1: be first stated that the bill does not increased skilled 90 00:06:11,360 --> 00:06:15,479 Speaker 1: immigration at all. There are no more visas in this bill, 91 00:06:16,080 --> 00:06:19,560 Speaker 1: uh for people coming to work in the United States 92 00:06:19,680 --> 00:06:23,239 Speaker 1: than under current laws. So it's just wrong to characterize 93 00:06:23,279 --> 00:06:29,039 Speaker 1: this bill as being a prioritization of skilled people. Uh. 94 00:06:29,040 --> 00:06:32,120 Speaker 1: It just create a new way to select them, and 95 00:06:32,200 --> 00:06:35,960 Speaker 1: that way is very strange. So you know, for example, uh, 96 00:06:36,040 --> 00:06:40,200 Speaker 1: simply being aged six is worth nearly twice as much 97 00:06:40,480 --> 00:06:43,720 Speaker 1: as being an entrepreneur who invests one point for a 98 00:06:43,839 --> 00:06:49,080 Speaker 1: million dollars in their US business. Um. So the calculation 99 00:06:49,200 --> 00:06:53,200 Speaker 1: that they're trying to do here really doesn't accord with 100 00:06:53,520 --> 00:06:57,320 Speaker 1: what we would consider merit in a purely economic sense 101 00:06:57,880 --> 00:07:01,919 Speaker 1: of the word. And I was mentioned a Pew Research Center. 102 00:07:02,120 --> 00:07:06,320 Speaker 1: It said that in immigrants who arrived in the past 103 00:07:06,400 --> 00:07:09,280 Speaker 1: five years held a college degree that's much higher than 104 00:07:09,320 --> 00:07:13,720 Speaker 1: the of non immigrants in the US, and eighteen percent 105 00:07:14,080 --> 00:07:18,680 Speaker 1: held an advanced degree, also much higher than the US average. So, Kevin, 106 00:07:19,160 --> 00:07:24,880 Speaker 1: what is the point of this system, this bill? Um, 107 00:07:24,920 --> 00:07:30,560 Speaker 1: It's it's really unclear. Um. The President mentioned Canada and Australia. Well, 108 00:07:30,560 --> 00:07:33,560 Speaker 1: we're not Canada last time I checked the map, and 109 00:07:33,560 --> 00:07:37,520 Speaker 1: we're certainly not Australia. And he's trying to put their 110 00:07:37,560 --> 00:07:39,880 Speaker 1: system and impose it on an economy that's one of 111 00:07:40,000 --> 00:07:42,600 Speaker 1: the largest economy in the world and the most diverse 112 00:07:42,760 --> 00:07:45,640 Speaker 1: economy in the world, where you can't just have one 113 00:07:45,680 --> 00:07:48,960 Speaker 1: size sets all. So it's really a head scratcher in 114 00:07:49,000 --> 00:07:54,920 Speaker 1: a lot of ways. I think, frankly, it's driven by ideology, um, 115 00:07:54,960 --> 00:07:59,080 Speaker 1: by some in the administration who basically want to limit 116 00:07:59,120 --> 00:08:01,480 Speaker 1: the number of immigrants that come here and want to 117 00:08:01,800 --> 00:08:04,040 Speaker 1: limit the type of immigrants that want to come here. 118 00:08:04,080 --> 00:08:08,400 Speaker 1: I think that's really what's behind this legislation. Well, yesterday 119 00:08:08,600 --> 00:08:10,920 Speaker 1: President Trump also said they're not going to come in 120 00:08:10,960 --> 00:08:15,120 Speaker 1: and immediately go and collect welfare. But under a welfare 121 00:08:15,160 --> 00:08:19,520 Speaker 1: reform bill signed by Bill Clinton, legal immigrants are already 122 00:08:19,560 --> 00:08:24,960 Speaker 1: barred from receiving government benefits for five years or longer. David, 123 00:08:25,880 --> 00:08:29,760 Speaker 1: what happens to For example, the Trump organization has asked 124 00:08:29,760 --> 00:08:33,439 Speaker 1: for dozens of H two B visas for foreign workers 125 00:08:33,440 --> 00:08:37,080 Speaker 1: at two of Trump's private clubs in Florida, including Themorrow 126 00:08:37,600 --> 00:08:42,000 Speaker 1: Lago Resort. What about those kinds of visas that are 127 00:08:42,040 --> 00:08:45,480 Speaker 1: they affected by this? No, this really only deals with 128 00:08:45,679 --> 00:08:49,280 Speaker 1: people who are coming to the country permanently for permanent residencies, 129 00:08:49,320 --> 00:08:54,120 Speaker 1: So it doesn't affect those guest worker visas that the 130 00:08:54,200 --> 00:08:58,800 Speaker 1: Trump organization has used in the past, and Trump, to 131 00:08:58,960 --> 00:09:04,120 Speaker 1: his credit, actually defended his use of those visas UH 132 00:09:04,200 --> 00:09:09,520 Speaker 1: during his campaign during a primary debate. In fact, so Uh, 133 00:09:09,720 --> 00:09:14,640 Speaker 1: he understands that the economy does need immigrants, but perhaps 134 00:09:14,640 --> 00:09:18,160 Speaker 1: he only understands it on behalf of his individual businesses 135 00:09:18,320 --> 00:09:22,640 Speaker 1: rather than taking overall of you of the economy and 136 00:09:22,720 --> 00:09:26,600 Speaker 1: understanding that other businesses would also have needs for more 137 00:09:26,760 --> 00:09:34,920 Speaker 1: longer term UH positions. Um Kevin, what is going to 138 00:09:35,200 --> 00:09:38,400 Speaker 1: happen in for example, there was a lot of other 139 00:09:39,040 --> 00:09:42,079 Speaker 1: there are a lot of other priorities for the president 140 00:09:42,320 --> 00:09:46,760 Speaker 1: and Congress. Is this Does this bill have any chance 141 00:09:47,080 --> 00:09:52,680 Speaker 1: of going forward? Well, any bill that's in Congress has 142 00:09:52,760 --> 00:09:55,959 Speaker 1: some percentage of chance, but um, and you have to 143 00:09:56,000 --> 00:09:58,880 Speaker 1: always prepare that a bill like this could move either 144 00:09:59,559 --> 00:10:03,080 Speaker 1: on a opriations bill or there may be momentum towards 145 00:10:03,080 --> 00:10:06,240 Speaker 1: some sort of immigration package which includes, for example, the 146 00:10:06,320 --> 00:10:09,679 Speaker 1: Dream Act. And of course the administration and the sponsors 147 00:10:09,679 --> 00:10:12,000 Speaker 1: would insist on some of the provisions of this bill. 148 00:10:12,559 --> 00:10:15,760 Speaker 1: But as you said, there's a full plate in Congress. 149 00:10:15,800 --> 00:10:18,560 Speaker 1: There's not a big appetite for immigration reform right now, 150 00:10:19,120 --> 00:10:22,520 Speaker 1: so and they've got big budget issues, so I think, 151 00:10:22,600 --> 00:10:25,760 Speaker 1: you know they won't turn to this anytime soon, and 152 00:10:25,800 --> 00:10:28,040 Speaker 1: then you come to the mid terms. I don't think 153 00:10:28,040 --> 00:10:29,520 Speaker 1: the likely it is high that this is going to 154 00:10:29,600 --> 00:10:31,320 Speaker 1: see the light of the day. But you know, you 155 00:10:31,440 --> 00:10:33,760 Speaker 1: never say never. You always have to be vigilant about 156 00:10:34,240 --> 00:10:36,680 Speaker 1: these types of things that may move when you don't 157 00:10:36,720 --> 00:10:39,360 Speaker 1: expect them. And David, what's your take on whether or 158 00:10:39,400 --> 00:10:42,680 Speaker 1: not this is going to move forward? Well, I don't 159 00:10:42,679 --> 00:10:46,000 Speaker 1: see any Democrats signing on to this. So as long 160 00:10:46,040 --> 00:10:49,720 Speaker 1: as the filibuster remains in effect, Uh, you're not gonna 161 00:10:49,800 --> 00:10:52,800 Speaker 1: see this bill moving forward in the Senate. And you've 162 00:10:52,800 --> 00:10:57,000 Speaker 1: had several Republicans already criticize it. Uh, So you know, 163 00:10:57,040 --> 00:10:59,040 Speaker 1: the idea that it's going to move forward in its 164 00:10:59,080 --> 00:11:04,160 Speaker 1: current form at ly uh is very small. And also, Kevin, 165 00:11:04,360 --> 00:11:08,360 Speaker 1: there were business groups and the US Chamber of Commerce 166 00:11:08,400 --> 00:11:12,559 Speaker 1: in particular, saying it would do serious damage to the economy. 167 00:11:13,440 --> 00:11:16,120 Speaker 1: Which groups are there that are supporting this? In about 168 00:11:16,160 --> 00:11:21,560 Speaker 1: thirty seconds, well, I think the restrictionist groups are supporting it. UM, 169 00:11:21,880 --> 00:11:26,640 Speaker 1: the Federation of Americans, Immigration Reform Numbers USA. UM, you 170 00:11:26,640 --> 00:11:31,679 Speaker 1: know the groups that Steve Bannon associates with who basically 171 00:11:31,720 --> 00:11:35,120 Speaker 1: just want lower levels of immigrants in the country, and 172 00:11:35,120 --> 00:11:38,800 Speaker 1: and they're looking to create a system that deports a 173 00:11:38,960 --> 00:11:41,760 Speaker 1: large number of immigrants. That they're they're really the forces 174 00:11:41,840 --> 00:11:45,920 Speaker 1: behind it. But I otherwise I don't see other groups 175 00:11:46,120 --> 00:11:49,880 Speaker 1: come out and have supported this this film all right, 176 00:11:49,880 --> 00:11:53,200 Speaker 1: Thank you both, including business, Thank you both being here. 177 00:11:53,800 --> 00:11:57,200 Speaker 1: Kevin Applebe, Senior director of International Migration Policy at the 178 00:11:57,200 --> 00:12:00,960 Speaker 1: Center from Migration Studies and dated Theer Immigration Policy Analysts 179 00:12:00,960 --> 00:12:02,319 Speaker 1: at the Cato Institute