WEBVTT - Peter Tchir on the Markets (Radio)

0:00:00.120 --> 0:00:02.200
<v Speaker 1>Let's bring in Peter Cheer, he has head of macro

0:00:02.320 --> 0:00:06.800
<v Speaker 1>Strategy at Academy Securities to take a look at today's

0:00:06.880 --> 0:00:10.440
<v Speaker 1>volatility and markets a lot. Peter has focused on some

0:00:10.480 --> 0:00:14.520
<v Speaker 1>of the geopolitical risk that maybe markets had become a

0:00:14.560 --> 0:00:18.560
<v Speaker 1>little complacent on. Would you say that's a fair statement. Yeah,

0:00:18.560 --> 0:00:20.200
<v Speaker 1>I think it's a very fair statement. One of the

0:00:20.280 --> 0:00:23.120
<v Speaker 1>meat things about Academy Securities is we have seventeen retired

0:00:23.160 --> 0:00:26.439
<v Speaker 1>generals and admirals who serve as our geopolitical intelligence group.

0:00:26.720 --> 0:00:29.960
<v Speaker 1>We started analyzing this situation the minute occurred, and I

0:00:30.000 --> 0:00:33.240
<v Speaker 1>think this situation is no matter what happened, this is

0:00:33.240 --> 0:00:35.760
<v Speaker 1>probably going to be an impetus to give Ukraine more

0:00:35.840 --> 0:00:39.280
<v Speaker 1>weapons and better weapons. So, no matter how this all happened,

0:00:39.720 --> 0:00:41.080
<v Speaker 1>I think that that's going to play out. And what

0:00:41.200 --> 0:00:43.400
<v Speaker 1>hasn't been mentioned enough is this all happened in a

0:00:43.520 --> 0:00:46.760
<v Speaker 1>day where Ukraine is potentially without of the country is

0:00:46.800 --> 0:00:49.919
<v Speaker 1>without power, that we're devastating attacks. So I think we're

0:00:49.920 --> 0:00:52.440
<v Speaker 1>going to see an escalation from our side. I think

0:00:52.440 --> 0:00:55.600
<v Speaker 1>now this gets worse before better. Regardless of Article five

0:00:55.680 --> 0:00:58.600
<v Speaker 1>or not, this is just gonna be an escalation with

0:00:59.240 --> 0:01:02.720
<v Speaker 1>what's going on. It's rather reminiscent of the Gulf of

0:01:02.800 --> 0:01:07.080
<v Speaker 1>Tonkin incident. Yes, and I think you know, we all

0:01:07.080 --> 0:01:09.360
<v Speaker 1>talked about escalation. You wonder how do you get to

0:01:09.400 --> 0:01:11.880
<v Speaker 1>some endpoint? And I think this is what happens. We'll

0:01:11.880 --> 0:01:14.200
<v Speaker 1>do something now all of a sudden. Imagine we give

0:01:14.280 --> 0:01:16.800
<v Speaker 1>Ukraine enough long range of missiles, they do something that

0:01:16.840 --> 0:01:19.240
<v Speaker 1>hits Russian territory. So I think this gets very dangerous

0:01:19.319 --> 0:01:21.679
<v Speaker 1>right now. So the knee jerk in terms of market

0:01:21.720 --> 0:01:25.440
<v Speaker 1>reaction sell risk. I mean, we saw popping crude oil prices,

0:01:25.480 --> 0:01:28.440
<v Speaker 1>but that trade didn't seem to be durable. Is what

0:01:28.480 --> 0:01:31.280
<v Speaker 1>you're saying is that we have to reconsider that and

0:01:31.280 --> 0:01:33.400
<v Speaker 1>and maybe we're going to be dealing with one factor,

0:01:33.440 --> 0:01:37.319
<v Speaker 1>which would be higher energy prices going forward. Yeah, I

0:01:37.360 --> 0:01:39.240
<v Speaker 1>went home convincing my clients to be a little bit

0:01:39.240 --> 0:01:41.760
<v Speaker 1>short on risk. We've been very bullish. We thought the

0:01:41.800 --> 0:01:44.120
<v Speaker 1>deflation trade was going to come through. That's been working out,

0:01:44.920 --> 0:01:47.240
<v Speaker 1>and I think the market got fixated on an article

0:01:47.319 --> 0:01:49.480
<v Speaker 1>five what this all meant. And I think the reality

0:01:49.600 --> 0:01:52.320
<v Speaker 1>is take a step back. There is no way that

0:01:52.440 --> 0:01:54.920
<v Speaker 1>Ukraine doesn't demand more weapons after this, and I think

0:01:54.920 --> 0:01:57.000
<v Speaker 1>it all likely that they get better weapons that is

0:01:57.000 --> 0:01:59.400
<v Speaker 1>going to escalate. And you saw Russia statements right there

0:01:59.400 --> 0:02:00.800
<v Speaker 1>denying they had an anything to do with this, but

0:02:00.840 --> 0:02:03.200
<v Speaker 1>they're saying, we're trying to escalate. So the moment we

0:02:03.240 --> 0:02:05.520
<v Speaker 1>do that, I think we're re entering a world of

0:02:05.520 --> 0:02:08.919
<v Speaker 1>geopolitical tensions where you just got comfortable that Putin maybe

0:02:08.960 --> 0:02:11.480
<v Speaker 1>was taking it easy, that g seemed to be pushing

0:02:11.480 --> 0:02:14.280
<v Speaker 1>Pudin towards peace, that maybe after the elections we wanted it.

0:02:14.639 --> 0:02:18.440
<v Speaker 1>I think this is a step backwards. Okay, well, let's

0:02:18.480 --> 0:02:20.480
<v Speaker 1>people have a look at what your generals may be

0:02:20.560 --> 0:02:22.760
<v Speaker 1>telling you about, you know, the loss of care Son

0:02:23.520 --> 0:02:26.880
<v Speaker 1>by the Russians, how I mean inst of all going

0:02:26.960 --> 0:02:30.680
<v Speaker 1>that badly in their view. Yes, I think the war

0:02:30.800 --> 0:02:33.280
<v Speaker 1>is going very badly in the view of our generals.

0:02:33.560 --> 0:02:37.160
<v Speaker 1>They keep making mistake after mistake. Our current base cases

0:02:37.240 --> 0:02:39.280
<v Speaker 1>what we think will happen is and this is gonna

0:02:39.280 --> 0:02:41.040
<v Speaker 1>be a little bit hard to do over radio, but

0:02:41.240 --> 0:02:43.760
<v Speaker 1>Russia needs to go east to west, and all the

0:02:43.840 --> 0:02:46.320
<v Speaker 1>rivers in the Ukraine run north south, so they need

0:02:46.360 --> 0:02:49.760
<v Speaker 1>those rivers to freeze to make a proper attack going forward.

0:02:49.960 --> 0:02:52.959
<v Speaker 1>Because Ukraine, especially with all the recent weaponry that we

0:02:53.040 --> 0:02:55.799
<v Speaker 1>give them, the high mars, etcetera. We can stop them

0:02:55.800 --> 0:02:59.520
<v Speaker 1>from crossing bridges. So Russian needs things to freeze before

0:02:59.520 --> 0:03:02.079
<v Speaker 1>they make one more launched. It's been going very badly.

0:03:02.120 --> 0:03:05.760
<v Speaker 1>They keep losing and their tactics seem awful. So if

0:03:05.840 --> 0:03:09.400
<v Speaker 1>markets have it right then, and or maybe they don't

0:03:09.400 --> 0:03:11.520
<v Speaker 1>and we need to see some kind of readjustment. Does

0:03:11.560 --> 0:03:14.919
<v Speaker 1>that necessarily mean stronger dollar, lower yields, and and a

0:03:15.000 --> 0:03:19.840
<v Speaker 1>FED that's in a much more tight situation. I think

0:03:19.840 --> 0:03:22.080
<v Speaker 1>it means lower yields, but I don't think it puts

0:03:22.120 --> 0:03:25.000
<v Speaker 1>the FED dealing with inflation. Right. If we see oil

0:03:25.080 --> 0:03:27.760
<v Speaker 1>prices go up because of a renewed focus on the war,

0:03:28.560 --> 0:03:30.720
<v Speaker 1>I don't think the FED reacts to that right. Traditionally

0:03:30.760 --> 0:03:34.120
<v Speaker 1>the FED actually eases into war. So I don't think

0:03:34.440 --> 0:03:38.880
<v Speaker 1>higher oil prices trigger FED inflation response. They figure they

0:03:38.920 --> 0:03:41.240
<v Speaker 1>trigger more a FED. Hey, we have to see where

0:03:41.240 --> 0:03:43.000
<v Speaker 1>this is all headed, one way or the other. I

0:03:43.000 --> 0:03:45.320
<v Speaker 1>think this escalates the end game, whether it's a good

0:03:45.360 --> 0:03:48.000
<v Speaker 1>or bad endgame, whether maybe everyone finally pushes people to

0:03:48.000 --> 0:03:49.760
<v Speaker 1>the table, so there could be a good result, but

0:03:49.760 --> 0:03:52.240
<v Speaker 1>I think right now worse and then let's see how

0:03:52.240 --> 0:03:56.120
<v Speaker 1>the people respond. I'm going to keep on talking about this,

0:03:56.280 --> 0:03:58.840
<v Speaker 1>but at the end of the day, it's the way

0:03:58.880 --> 0:04:01.440
<v Speaker 1>to conclude. This may well have to be some kind

0:04:01.440 --> 0:04:05.840
<v Speaker 1>of face saving for Vladimir Putin. Yes, I think in

0:04:05.880 --> 0:04:08.040
<v Speaker 1>the end what we want to avoid is where he

0:04:08.120 --> 0:04:10.880
<v Speaker 1>feels that he has to I hate to say the term,

0:04:10.880 --> 0:04:13.400
<v Speaker 1>but go nuclear. We don't want him to see feel

0:04:13.480 --> 0:04:16.240
<v Speaker 1>so panicked that he loses, and I think some negotiation

0:04:16.320 --> 0:04:19.159
<v Speaker 1>has to occur where Ukraine maybe has to give up something,

0:04:19.160 --> 0:04:21.160
<v Speaker 1>which I think Zelensky is going to be very reluctant

0:04:21.160 --> 0:04:23.360
<v Speaker 1>to do, but maybe just has to get to old listen,

0:04:23.400 --> 0:04:26.360
<v Speaker 1>we cannot keep supporting you in this way, give up

0:04:26.480 --> 0:04:30.200
<v Speaker 1>something so Putent can go home peacefully. And it's really

0:04:30.200 --> 0:04:33.359
<v Speaker 1>crucial right now as Ukraine's facing a as we mentioned earlier,

0:04:34.040 --> 0:04:38.440
<v Speaker 1>huge electrical power shortages, which as you face winner, that's

0:04:38.440 --> 0:04:40.880
<v Speaker 1>not something we can do. But as the sanctions ramp up,

0:04:40.920 --> 0:04:42.839
<v Speaker 1>I think there's a lot of evidence that it's going

0:04:42.880 --> 0:04:45.599
<v Speaker 1>to hurt us the West collectively more than it hurts Russia.

0:04:45.839 --> 0:04:47.920
<v Speaker 1>So maybe we want to avoid those sanctions as well.

0:04:48.000 --> 0:04:51.039
<v Speaker 1>So peace seems the best outcome. And maybe this is that,

0:04:51.240 --> 0:04:53.320
<v Speaker 1>you know, one step backwards before we get the two

0:04:53.360 --> 0:04:55.800
<v Speaker 1>steps forward much more in the way of headwind I'm

0:04:55.839 --> 0:04:58.839
<v Speaker 1>imagining for Europe's economy. Play that out for me, What

0:04:58.880 --> 0:05:03.000
<v Speaker 1>does that look like? Yeah, I think Europe. It felt

0:05:03.040 --> 0:05:04.919
<v Speaker 1>like Europe was just turning the corner right. More and

0:05:04.920 --> 0:05:07.400
<v Speaker 1>more analysts, including myself, were saying, Okay, maybe they've done

0:05:07.520 --> 0:05:09.839
<v Speaker 1>enough to make it through this winter. Maybe we're okay,

0:05:10.600 --> 0:05:12.839
<v Speaker 1>And now that feels off the table, right. If there's

0:05:12.880 --> 0:05:15.599
<v Speaker 1>this friction, it's problematic. And the other thing, which I

0:05:15.600 --> 0:05:18.159
<v Speaker 1>haven't mentioned, comes up often when you talk, especially with

0:05:18.160 --> 0:05:22.200
<v Speaker 1>our geopolitical history, is the force migration that's gone on

0:05:22.400 --> 0:05:25.800
<v Speaker 1>in Europe is unseen since World War Two, and at

0:05:25.839 --> 0:05:27.640
<v Speaker 1>times it's probably even worse than World War Two. Right,

0:05:27.640 --> 0:05:30.719
<v Speaker 1>we've displaced five to eight million Ukrainians into Western Europe.

0:05:30.720 --> 0:05:33.200
<v Speaker 1>The longer this war goes on, the harder it's going

0:05:33.200 --> 0:05:35.440
<v Speaker 1>to be for them to return. The more destruction that

0:05:35.480 --> 0:05:38.800
<v Speaker 1>goes on to their old property, their apartments, harder for

0:05:38.839 --> 0:05:40.880
<v Speaker 1>them to return. So that's yet another reason I think

0:05:40.880 --> 0:05:43.120
<v Speaker 1>we need to sit down and get some sort of

0:05:43.200 --> 0:05:45.640
<v Speaker 1>truce that maybe gets put in just enough that we

0:05:45.680 --> 0:05:47.640
<v Speaker 1>can get out of this. But let's move away from

0:05:47.640 --> 0:05:49.680
<v Speaker 1>the missile strike and and just talk about what it's

0:05:49.680 --> 0:05:51.840
<v Speaker 1>going on in terms of how you see the global

0:05:51.880 --> 0:05:54.839
<v Speaker 1>economy panning out, how you see inflation at the moment,

0:05:54.880 --> 0:05:58.359
<v Speaker 1>and whether it's peaked or not. I think inflations peaked.

0:05:58.400 --> 0:06:00.800
<v Speaker 1>I think it's rolling over very quickly. And some of

0:06:00.760 --> 0:06:02.840
<v Speaker 1>it's obvious, right the higher interest rates. I think the

0:06:02.920 --> 0:06:05.279
<v Speaker 1>US economy was more leveraged to raise than people expected.

0:06:05.279 --> 0:06:07.760
<v Speaker 1>You're seeing it in housing, you're seeing it in autos.

0:06:08.920 --> 0:06:11.400
<v Speaker 1>I think the job's number we might have to come back,

0:06:11.480 --> 0:06:14.159
<v Speaker 1>because that's the one remaining issue. The other part, to

0:06:14.200 --> 0:06:16.800
<v Speaker 1>me has been the wealth effect, the complete wealth destruction

0:06:16.839 --> 0:06:19.600
<v Speaker 1>that's gone on, and where I'm really focused. I think

0:06:19.600 --> 0:06:22.880
<v Speaker 1>it's very different. This time. It was very concentrated wealth creation,

0:06:23.120 --> 0:06:25.880
<v Speaker 1>and it was the disruptive companies. It was the crypto companies,

0:06:26.200 --> 0:06:28.719
<v Speaker 1>and I see it as threefold. One the companies themselves,

0:06:28.880 --> 0:06:30.719
<v Speaker 1>so they were able to raise money, and they spent

0:06:30.800 --> 0:06:33.880
<v Speaker 1>that money aggressively, their employees, their stock options were worth

0:06:33.880 --> 0:06:36.120
<v Speaker 1>a lot of money. They were spending that money. And

0:06:36.160 --> 0:06:38.760
<v Speaker 1>then just the casual investor is working very well. All

0:06:38.839 --> 0:06:40.560
<v Speaker 1>that's gone down. So I think that's gonna be a

0:06:40.600 --> 0:06:43.120
<v Speaker 1>huge drag in the economy. I think it's gonna infect technology,

0:06:43.400 --> 0:06:46.280
<v Speaker 1>it's gonna affect semis, etcetera. But one pushback I get

0:06:46.320 --> 0:06:49.359
<v Speaker 1>to my view that inflation is really topped out is

0:06:49.360 --> 0:06:52.080
<v Speaker 1>people are looking at jobs, and I see two things

0:06:52.120 --> 0:06:55.560
<v Speaker 1>about that. One is, traditionally jobs are very lagging indicator,

0:06:55.800 --> 0:06:57.560
<v Speaker 1>and I think it's gonna be more liking this time

0:06:57.560 --> 0:07:00.359
<v Speaker 1>than we've ever seen before, partly because HR people have

0:07:00.400 --> 0:07:02.080
<v Speaker 1>spent the last year and a half trying to hire

0:07:02.279 --> 0:07:04.359
<v Speaker 1>and have been unable to hire. They are not going

0:07:04.400 --> 0:07:06.120
<v Speaker 1>to allow people to get fired. They're going to figure

0:07:06.120 --> 0:07:08.840
<v Speaker 1>out other ways to cut costs before firing. So jobs

0:07:08.920 --> 0:07:10.600
<v Speaker 1>is going to be the last lay to drop, and

0:07:10.640 --> 0:07:12.640
<v Speaker 1>I think that starts happening. And when you look at

0:07:12.640 --> 0:07:17.000
<v Speaker 1>some of the discommunities between household versus establishment versus birth

0:07:17.040 --> 0:07:21.640
<v Speaker 1>death models, I think we're prepared actually to see a big,

0:07:21.680 --> 0:07:24.800
<v Speaker 1>shockingly not good number in this next job's report. So

0:07:24.840 --> 0:07:27.560
<v Speaker 1>that's why I think inflations rolled over. I think it's problematic.

0:07:27.840 --> 0:07:30.040
<v Speaker 1>I think markets can be happy briefly that we go

0:07:30.120 --> 0:07:32.720
<v Speaker 1>through a soft landing type scenario, but I think soon

0:07:32.720 --> 0:07:35.320
<v Speaker 1>we're gonna start pricing in a hard landing. Hard landing,

0:07:35.320 --> 0:07:38.360
<v Speaker 1>and what about earnings disappointments. Are we going to see

0:07:38.360 --> 0:07:41.640
<v Speaker 1>a lot in the way of that. Yes, I think

0:07:41.680 --> 0:07:44.640
<v Speaker 1>we're already struggling. One thing, You look at some of

0:07:44.640 --> 0:07:46.400
<v Speaker 1>the companies that are laying off people, and they're laying

0:07:46.440 --> 0:07:48.560
<v Speaker 1>off people at what seems like an awkward time. Right,

0:07:48.560 --> 0:07:50.760
<v Speaker 1>We're usually coming into one of the most robust business

0:07:50.760 --> 0:07:52.960
<v Speaker 1>seasons in the US and you get companies that are

0:07:53.000 --> 0:07:56.480
<v Speaker 1>involved in that area letting people go. I think the

0:07:56.600 --> 0:07:59.960
<v Speaker 1>f X volatially is problematic, but more importantly, everywhere I look,

0:08:00.120 --> 0:08:03.920
<v Speaker 1>people are having sales. Right, it's off this off that

0:08:04.200 --> 0:08:07.040
<v Speaker 1>I think retail is still struggling. The service industry has

0:08:07.080 --> 0:08:08.800
<v Speaker 1>done very well. But what I can't tell with the

0:08:08.800 --> 0:08:11.760
<v Speaker 1>service industry whether this is a one time effect coming

0:08:11.840 --> 0:08:14.760
<v Speaker 1>to the US holiday season and it dissipates after year

0:08:14.840 --> 0:08:17.000
<v Speaker 1>end or it doesn't. I lean towards that this is

0:08:17.040 --> 0:08:19.560
<v Speaker 1>going to dissipate. So I see the economy rolling over,

0:08:20.160 --> 0:08:23.320
<v Speaker 1>higher rates playing a price, and this wealth effect, this

0:08:23.600 --> 0:08:27.920
<v Speaker 1>pure wealth destruction we've seen in disruptive companies and crypto

0:08:28.160 --> 0:08:31.720
<v Speaker 1>having a much bigger effect than people realize. I've got

0:08:31.760 --> 0:08:35.520
<v Speaker 1>to ask you this question, how far is now uh

0:08:36.840 --> 0:08:39.120
<v Speaker 1>crypto being Well, let's just put in another way, how

0:08:39.160 --> 0:08:42.239
<v Speaker 1>badly damage is crypto being as a consequence of the

0:08:42.480 --> 0:08:45.640
<v Speaker 1>f t X debuclet. So I think it has a

0:08:45.640 --> 0:08:47.560
<v Speaker 1>lot more way to go down. It's I would not

0:08:47.640 --> 0:08:51.000
<v Speaker 1>touch bitcoin until it's well below ten thousand. Clearly we're

0:08:51.000 --> 0:08:53.320
<v Speaker 1>getting little bounces. But you know, I talk a lot

0:08:53.360 --> 0:08:55.840
<v Speaker 1>about there's two ways to lose money. One is you

0:08:55.880 --> 0:08:58.520
<v Speaker 1>buy an asset that goes down in price, and that's

0:08:58.640 --> 0:09:00.559
<v Speaker 1>we all do that, right, It's been in possible year

0:09:00.600 --> 0:09:03.040
<v Speaker 1>this in many respects with you about bond stocks. It

0:09:03.080 --> 0:09:05.600
<v Speaker 1>didn't matter, it was easy to lose money. One problem

0:09:05.600 --> 0:09:07.640
<v Speaker 1>with losing money on some of these crypto investments is

0:09:07.679 --> 0:09:09.360
<v Speaker 1>you don't even really have a good floor. You don't

0:09:09.400 --> 0:09:11.599
<v Speaker 1>understand what it could be, as we saw, say with

0:09:11.640 --> 0:09:15.080
<v Speaker 1>the FTT token. The other way you lose money is

0:09:15.160 --> 0:09:17.520
<v Speaker 1>you give your money to someone to hold and they

0:09:17.520 --> 0:09:19.800
<v Speaker 1>don't return it to you or can't return it to you.

0:09:20.120 --> 0:09:22.280
<v Speaker 1>And that's what just went on with ft X by

0:09:22.320 --> 0:09:24.680
<v Speaker 1>the looks of it, right So, and it happened earlier

0:09:24.679 --> 0:09:27.360
<v Speaker 1>this year with Celsius, and that to me is really

0:09:27.400 --> 0:09:29.960
<v Speaker 1>hard because with enough due diligence, you feel you could

0:09:30.000 --> 0:09:32.240
<v Speaker 1>ultimately trust someone that you give your money to and

0:09:32.320 --> 0:09:36.040
<v Speaker 1>until that gets resolved, I don't see institutional investors coming

0:09:36.040 --> 0:09:38.400
<v Speaker 1>to this market. In fact, I see people fleeing this

0:09:38.480 --> 0:09:41.000
<v Speaker 1>market because you can't even trust if you get your

0:09:41.000 --> 0:09:44.320
<v Speaker 1>decision to buy crypto right, that you get your returns back,

0:09:44.400 --> 0:09:47.360
<v Speaker 1>and that's a big issue. Peter, thank you so much

0:09:47.360 --> 0:09:49.920
<v Speaker 1>for joining. Is always a pleasure, never a chue. Peter Cheer,

0:09:50.000 --> 0:09:53.280
<v Speaker 1>the head of macro strategy Academy Security, is getting his

0:09:53.320 --> 0:09:55.040
<v Speaker 1>take on the markets and more.