1 00:00:02,520 --> 00:00:09,160 Speaker 1: Bloomberg Audio Studios, podcasts, radio news. Eric Rosngrin joins us 2 00:00:09,200 --> 00:00:13,840 Speaker 1: right now, former Federal Reserve President of Boston, and Eric, 3 00:00:13,840 --> 00:00:16,080 Speaker 1: I do want to start off with the general idea 4 00:00:16,400 --> 00:00:19,720 Speaker 1: of what the FED can do next, given the economic 5 00:00:19,800 --> 00:00:22,720 Speaker 1: data that we've seen that seems to suggests a labor 6 00:00:22,720 --> 00:00:26,720 Speaker 1: market influx but still stable, and inflation well still a 7 00:00:26,800 --> 00:00:30,000 Speaker 1: question mark, but not necessarily hot as it was just 8 00:00:30,040 --> 00:00:30,840 Speaker 1: a year or so ago. 9 00:00:33,080 --> 00:00:36,680 Speaker 2: Yeah, so I agree with you that the conditions for 10 00:00:37,040 --> 00:00:41,319 Speaker 2: easing right now are not nearly as strong as they 11 00:00:41,400 --> 00:00:46,080 Speaker 2: might have been a quarter ago. The CPI at two 12 00:00:46,159 --> 00:00:52,520 Speaker 2: point seven percent is substantially above the two percent inflation target. 13 00:00:52,800 --> 00:00:56,600 Speaker 2: It was two point seven last month as well, and 14 00:00:57,480 --> 00:00:59,920 Speaker 2: if you look at the PCE measure of inflation is 15 00:01:00,080 --> 00:01:04,720 Speaker 2: been gradually rising. So the result is that the inflation 16 00:01:04,880 --> 00:01:08,520 Speaker 2: news has not been such that you can have a 17 00:01:08,560 --> 00:01:10,640 Speaker 2: great deal of confidence if the Fed's going to get 18 00:01:10,680 --> 00:01:13,880 Speaker 2: back to target, particularly as you note they've missed their 19 00:01:13,880 --> 00:01:18,119 Speaker 2: two percent target for almost five years. On the labor 20 00:01:18,200 --> 00:01:22,160 Speaker 2: market side, there were only fifty thousand jobs created, but 21 00:01:22,240 --> 00:01:24,640 Speaker 2: that's the average that we've seen over the last year, 22 00:01:25,280 --> 00:01:28,480 Speaker 2: and part of that is because of immigration, with much 23 00:01:28,520 --> 00:01:32,000 Speaker 2: less immigration, we don't have as much growth in the 24 00:01:32,040 --> 00:01:34,920 Speaker 2: labor force. In fact, labor force has been pretty much flat, 25 00:01:35,360 --> 00:01:38,600 Speaker 2: and so fifty thousand jobs isn't that far out of 26 00:01:38,640 --> 00:01:41,639 Speaker 2: the ordinary given the slow growth in the labor force. 27 00:01:42,480 --> 00:01:46,000 Speaker 2: The unemployment rates at four point four percent, that's very 28 00:01:46,000 --> 00:01:48,840 Speaker 2: close to what the FED thinks it will be in 29 00:01:48,880 --> 00:01:51,040 Speaker 2: the long run. It's a little bit above, but only 30 00:01:51,080 --> 00:01:53,840 Speaker 2: a little bit above. So I think that the Fed 31 00:01:53,960 --> 00:01:57,040 Speaker 2: is well situated to wait and see and see if 32 00:01:57,040 --> 00:02:01,200 Speaker 2: the economy picks up. There is reasonable weave that next 33 00:02:01,280 --> 00:02:05,200 Speaker 2: year GDP will be stronger. Fiscal policy is going to 34 00:02:05,200 --> 00:02:10,280 Speaker 2: be stimulative because we're running large deficits. The Big Beautiful 35 00:02:10,320 --> 00:02:16,680 Speaker 2: Bill included investment credits that encourage investment and also has 36 00:02:16,760 --> 00:02:21,160 Speaker 2: lower taxes for helping consumers out. So I think the 37 00:02:21,200 --> 00:02:24,880 Speaker 2: conditions for reasonable growth next year are there, and so 38 00:02:25,040 --> 00:02:27,560 Speaker 2: as long as that actually pans out, there's really no 39 00:02:27,680 --> 00:02:30,959 Speaker 2: reason for the Fed to change the level of rates. 40 00:02:31,440 --> 00:02:33,200 Speaker 1: There has been sort of a parlor game going on 41 00:02:33,280 --> 00:02:35,600 Speaker 1: right now in financial markets, the idea that one way 42 00:02:35,680 --> 00:02:38,399 Speaker 1: or another we are going to see more accommodative policy 43 00:02:38,520 --> 00:02:41,240 Speaker 1: out of the FED this year, largely because of the 44 00:02:41,280 --> 00:02:45,600 Speaker 1: political factors here, whether it is the formal replacement of J. Powell, 45 00:02:46,160 --> 00:02:49,440 Speaker 1: it is expected departure date later this year in May, 46 00:02:49,520 --> 00:02:52,440 Speaker 1: or maybe potentially sooner than that. But just overall, the 47 00:02:52,480 --> 00:02:55,239 Speaker 1: idea that you have a White House it seems emboldened 48 00:02:55,560 --> 00:02:58,639 Speaker 1: in its desire to continue jaw boning where it thinks 49 00:02:58,680 --> 00:03:01,799 Speaker 1: monetary policies should go. Well, Eric, I know I heard 50 00:03:01,800 --> 00:03:04,120 Speaker 1: from all these former FED members that say, look, you 51 00:03:04,120 --> 00:03:06,640 Speaker 1: go into that room, you focus on the data, not 52 00:03:06,760 --> 00:03:08,920 Speaker 1: the politics going on down the street out of the 53 00:03:08,919 --> 00:03:11,440 Speaker 1: White House. This just feels a little bit different here 54 00:03:11,480 --> 00:03:12,639 Speaker 1: in twenty twenty six, though. 55 00:03:14,440 --> 00:03:17,560 Speaker 2: Well, I agree with the commentators that have said that 56 00:03:17,600 --> 00:03:20,480 Speaker 2: the FED tends to focus on the data, but it 57 00:03:20,480 --> 00:03:24,400 Speaker 2: does matter who's in positions to make the decisions. And 58 00:03:24,440 --> 00:03:29,040 Speaker 2: so J. Powell's term ends in May, and assuming that 59 00:03:29,120 --> 00:03:32,920 Speaker 2: the administration comes up with someone to replace Jay and 60 00:03:32,960 --> 00:03:37,280 Speaker 2: it gets sent that person gets Senate confirmation, the Administration's 61 00:03:37,320 --> 00:03:40,080 Speaker 2: made clear that they're not going to point somebody who 62 00:03:40,160 --> 00:03:45,520 Speaker 2: doesn't believe that interest rates should drop quite significantly, which 63 00:03:45,520 --> 00:03:49,000 Speaker 2: has been clearly expressed by the President. So I think 64 00:03:49,120 --> 00:03:53,120 Speaker 2: most of the optimism for interest rates coming down assumes 65 00:03:53,200 --> 00:03:55,680 Speaker 2: that it's going to happen in the second half the year, 66 00:03:56,560 --> 00:04:00,920 Speaker 2: when there's a new FED share in place, Well, it's 67 00:04:00,960 --> 00:04:04,520 Speaker 2: still a committee decision. Whoever gets picked has to have 68 00:04:04,640 --> 00:04:08,080 Speaker 2: enough credibility and has to have strong enough arguments that 69 00:04:08,120 --> 00:04:12,360 Speaker 2: he convinces a majority of the FOMC to vote their way. 70 00:04:12,920 --> 00:04:15,320 Speaker 2: So it's still not a slam dunk. Even with the 71 00:04:15,400 --> 00:04:20,880 Speaker 2: new FED share that rates actually declined, particularly if the 72 00:04:20,960 --> 00:04:27,520 Speaker 2: administration jaw boning and potential legal challenges raise concerns about 73 00:04:27,600 --> 00:04:30,839 Speaker 2: federal reserve and independence and make some of the voting 74 00:04:30,880 --> 00:04:35,159 Speaker 2: members want to be sure that the economic conditions justify 75 00:04:35,200 --> 00:04:35,560 Speaker 2: a move. 76 00:04:35,880 --> 00:04:40,560 Speaker 1: Well, given the DOJ subpoenas into Pale ostensibly into Pal's 77 00:04:40,560 --> 00:04:44,280 Speaker 1: handling other renovations of the FED building, given the Supreme 78 00:04:44,400 --> 00:04:48,719 Speaker 1: or Court argument scheduled to start next week involving Lisa Cook, 79 00:04:48,800 --> 00:04:52,120 Speaker 1: and the power of the President to actually remove a 80 00:04:52,200 --> 00:04:56,119 Speaker 1: FED governor, seemingly at will I am curious Eric about 81 00:04:56,160 --> 00:04:59,360 Speaker 1: this idea of fedder independence and whether we should really 82 00:04:59,360 --> 00:05:01,440 Speaker 1: start looking at this is the beginning of the end, 83 00:05:01,760 --> 00:05:05,880 Speaker 1: particularly given the comments out of the three former FED 84 00:05:05,960 --> 00:05:09,800 Speaker 1: chiefs yesterday, their statement that they sign the support today 85 00:05:09,839 --> 00:05:14,680 Speaker 1: that we saw from monetary policy officials overseas, as well 86 00:05:14,720 --> 00:05:17,839 Speaker 1: as executives like JP Morgan CEO Jamie Diamond. 87 00:05:19,480 --> 00:05:24,680 Speaker 2: Yeah, so FED independence is critically important. Normally, losing FED 88 00:05:28,520 --> 00:05:31,479 Speaker 2: is something that happens in third world countries where either 89 00:05:31,520 --> 00:05:34,160 Speaker 2: they're having trouble managing your deficit and want to get 90 00:05:34,200 --> 00:05:38,160 Speaker 2: the interest rates down to make it easier to issue debt, 91 00:05:39,200 --> 00:05:42,280 Speaker 2: or they're trying to get interest rates down because they 92 00:05:42,360 --> 00:05:45,400 Speaker 2: think it will help them get elected in the upcoming election. 93 00:05:46,400 --> 00:05:50,359 Speaker 2: The Federal Reserve was constructed to be pretty independent from 94 00:05:50,480 --> 00:05:53,360 Speaker 2: the rest of government so that this kind of political 95 00:05:53,400 --> 00:05:57,000 Speaker 2: business cycle doesn't actually occur in the United States. So 96 00:05:57,080 --> 00:06:00,720 Speaker 2: to the extent that various actions by the end administration 97 00:06:01,760 --> 00:06:05,800 Speaker 2: undermine the belief that the FED will stay independent, it 98 00:06:05,880 --> 00:06:08,839 Speaker 2: will make harder for the next chair to actually lower 99 00:06:08,880 --> 00:06:14,120 Speaker 2: interest rates convince people that they are truly independent, and 100 00:06:14,240 --> 00:06:17,240 Speaker 2: runs the risk if people start becoming concerned that the 101 00:06:17,279 --> 00:06:21,400 Speaker 2: FED no longer is going to focus on inflation, that 102 00:06:21,560 --> 00:06:23,920 Speaker 2: even if interest rates go down at the short end, 103 00:06:24,520 --> 00:06:27,159 Speaker 2: the long end will go up as people become concerned 104 00:06:27,160 --> 00:06:30,880 Speaker 2: that the policies will generate ongoing inflation higher than what 105 00:06:30,960 --> 00:06:32,039 Speaker 2: we've historically had. 106 00:06:32,960 --> 00:06:34,880 Speaker 1: All Right, Eric, I have to leave. They always appreciate 107 00:06:34,880 --> 00:06:37,240 Speaker 1: getting your comments here. Eric rosen Grand, of course, former 108 00:06:37,279 --> 00:06:39,880 Speaker 1: president of the Federal Reserve Bank of Boston,