WEBVTT - Talking with Aleks Svetski - The UnCommunist Manifesto

0:00:00.080 --> 0:00:02.599
<v Speaker 1>Hey, welcome to another episode of the Mark mass Show

0:00:02.600 --> 0:00:05.600
<v Speaker 1>where we talk about the decentralized revolution. We talk about

0:00:05.600 --> 0:00:08.160
<v Speaker 1>the way the world is changing right before our very eyes,

0:00:08.200 --> 0:00:11.600
<v Speaker 1>as we're swinging from centralization to decentralization. Of course, we're

0:00:11.640 --> 0:00:15.400
<v Speaker 1>talking about bitcoin and how that changes the world. Um.

0:00:15.720 --> 0:00:18.080
<v Speaker 1>You know, I try to bring to you some education

0:00:18.120 --> 0:00:19.560
<v Speaker 1>to change the way you think. I try to bring

0:00:19.560 --> 0:00:21.560
<v Speaker 1>to you the latest breaking news each and every week

0:00:21.640 --> 0:00:24.080
<v Speaker 1>so you stay on top of this revolution as is happening,

0:00:24.120 --> 0:00:26.520
<v Speaker 1>play by play, and of course bring to you some

0:00:26.640 --> 0:00:29.280
<v Speaker 1>of my friends so you can hear some other opinions.

0:00:29.280 --> 0:00:31.280
<v Speaker 1>But just besides just to me, and that's what we

0:00:31.360 --> 0:00:34.000
<v Speaker 1>got for you. Right now, I'm in the studio with

0:00:34.040 --> 0:00:37.120
<v Speaker 1>my good friend Alex Spetzky is also the co author

0:00:37.800 --> 0:00:40.200
<v Speaker 1>of my new book that we just released this week

0:00:40.280 --> 0:00:42.839
<v Speaker 1>on Amazon. The title of the book is called The

0:00:43.080 --> 0:00:49.160
<v Speaker 1>Uncommunist Manifesto. Welcome Alex, thanks for joining me today, Mark,

0:00:49.200 --> 0:00:52.000
<v Speaker 1>thanks for having me back. But I think I'm one

0:00:52.040 --> 0:00:54.640
<v Speaker 1>of these recurring guests. You know, it's like recurring nightmare

0:00:54.760 --> 0:00:57.040
<v Speaker 1>that doesn't leave you. Alanna ha ha. Well, I guess

0:00:57.040 --> 0:00:59.480
<v Speaker 1>it depends on which way you view you view you, uh.

0:00:59.640 --> 0:01:02.440
<v Speaker 1>For many it's a pleasure and for many maybe at

0:01:02.480 --> 0:01:05.200
<v Speaker 1>is that nightmare. But so you know, something we've been

0:01:05.240 --> 0:01:07.400
<v Speaker 1>talking about for a while now and I'm just so

0:01:07.480 --> 0:01:09.759
<v Speaker 1>excited is we got this new book that we wrote

0:01:10.040 --> 0:01:13.080
<v Speaker 1>and it is out. Um it's on Amazon again. It's

0:01:13.120 --> 0:01:17.840
<v Speaker 1>The Uncommunist Manifesto. It was released on Monday. We've already

0:01:17.880 --> 0:01:23.560
<v Speaker 1>reached best seller status. So pretty excited about that. Um, exciting, right,

0:01:23.600 --> 0:01:25.400
<v Speaker 1>my my first book? Is this your first book? I

0:01:25.440 --> 0:01:28.720
<v Speaker 1>think it is right? This is yeah, we've we've both

0:01:28.720 --> 0:01:31.160
<v Speaker 1>broken our virginities this yeah, it was the first time

0:01:31.319 --> 0:01:33.800
<v Speaker 1>for each of us. And uh yeah, man, I think

0:01:33.840 --> 0:01:36.959
<v Speaker 1>we hit we hit the best seller in to our

0:01:37.200 --> 0:01:43.720
<v Speaker 1>political reads. We hit best seller in economics economic theory

0:01:44.080 --> 0:01:46.960
<v Speaker 1>for for about a day there, and there was one

0:01:46.959 --> 0:01:48.560
<v Speaker 1>other category. So we hit the best seller in a

0:01:48.600 --> 0:01:50.600
<v Speaker 1>couple of categories pretty quickly, which was good to see.

0:01:50.760 --> 0:01:54.280
<v Speaker 1>And you know, it's uh, it's it's doing well. There's

0:01:54.760 --> 0:01:56.720
<v Speaker 1>you know, the sales every single day. So we we're

0:01:56.720 --> 0:01:59.240
<v Speaker 1>just sort of seeing that book spread. And this is

0:01:59.360 --> 0:02:02.200
<v Speaker 1>over and above of what we obviously did on the

0:02:02.280 --> 0:02:05.360
<v Speaker 1>Kicks Out of Program about I think three or four

0:02:05.360 --> 0:02:09.040
<v Speaker 1>months ago. So yeah, I'm I really want to see

0:02:09.040 --> 0:02:11.040
<v Speaker 1>this message spread far and wide. It's not about the sales.

0:02:11.040 --> 0:02:14.399
<v Speaker 1>It's more about the the message getting out there because

0:02:14.400 --> 0:02:16.160
<v Speaker 1>I think we've kept it the zodcast at the time

0:02:16.280 --> 0:02:19.360
<v Speaker 1>in this book. Yeah. So, um that that first category,

0:02:19.440 --> 0:02:23.040
<v Speaker 1>the two hour read, it's an interesting category. I really

0:02:23.160 --> 0:02:24.519
<v Speaker 1>like it. Though. I know something that you and I

0:02:24.600 --> 0:02:27.840
<v Speaker 1>have talked about a lot most books today. You know,

0:02:27.880 --> 0:02:30.960
<v Speaker 1>I guess it's it's a symptom of short, short attention

0:02:31.000 --> 0:02:33.639
<v Speaker 1>spans or whatever. But um, these big books, which which

0:02:33.639 --> 0:02:36.079
<v Speaker 1>are great, Um, a lot of times they're overwhelming. They're

0:02:36.120 --> 0:02:38.359
<v Speaker 1>hard to read, and and and and there's a need

0:02:38.400 --> 0:02:40.160
<v Speaker 1>for them, there's they're great, but but a lot of

0:02:40.160 --> 0:02:43.040
<v Speaker 1>the great books of history are actually just very short.

0:02:43.440 --> 0:02:46.120
<v Speaker 1>As those books about ten thousand words, most people could

0:02:46.120 --> 0:02:48.160
<v Speaker 1>read about an hour, hour and a half. So I

0:02:48.200 --> 0:02:50.840
<v Speaker 1>think that's an important Uh, it's important for us because

0:02:50.840 --> 0:02:52.240
<v Speaker 1>if we want enough people to read it, we need

0:02:52.240 --> 0:02:55.600
<v Speaker 1>to make it easy to read, right m m. Yeah,

0:02:55.600 --> 0:02:58.960
<v Speaker 1>there's something to be said about delivering a couple good

0:02:59.000 --> 0:03:02.320
<v Speaker 1>ideas really concisely. So if you look at the classics,

0:03:02.400 --> 0:03:06.760
<v Speaker 1>like you know mcavelly, right, Nicola mcavelly, The Prince really

0:03:06.800 --> 0:03:11.840
<v Speaker 1>short book The Art of war, really short book. Balthasargreation's

0:03:12.200 --> 0:03:15.480
<v Speaker 1>book on Becoming the Best versions of from Winning Out Life.

0:03:15.480 --> 0:03:18.240
<v Speaker 1>It was a short book. I mean, the Communist Manifesto

0:03:18.760 --> 0:03:21.680
<v Speaker 1>was a short book, despite how ridiculous it was. The

0:03:21.760 --> 0:03:24.760
<v Speaker 1>Law by Frederick Bastia, short book, easy, one hour read.

0:03:24.840 --> 0:03:27.640
<v Speaker 1>So there is something to be said about a good

0:03:27.680 --> 0:03:31.400
<v Speaker 1>idea or a good couple of ideas that can be

0:03:31.480 --> 0:03:36.520
<v Speaker 1>concisely presented in something that is digestible in an hour

0:03:36.720 --> 0:03:38.960
<v Speaker 1>or two. And and I think we I think we've

0:03:38.960 --> 0:03:40.960
<v Speaker 1>done a good job here. You know, there's I think

0:03:41.400 --> 0:03:45.600
<v Speaker 1>four good solid ideas in the book that people can read,

0:03:46.120 --> 0:03:50.480
<v Speaker 1>they can take away, and I hope it helps them

0:03:50.720 --> 0:03:53.240
<v Speaker 1>kind of place a new lens in the way they

0:03:53.320 --> 0:03:56.280
<v Speaker 1>view the world. Let's let's talk through those four big ideas.

0:03:56.320 --> 0:03:58.080
<v Speaker 1>Let's start with the first one. What would you say

0:03:58.160 --> 0:04:01.160
<v Speaker 1>one of the big first big ideas is with the book. Well,

0:04:01.200 --> 0:04:02.720
<v Speaker 1>the first one is how we opened the book. So

0:04:02.840 --> 0:04:05.839
<v Speaker 1>Mark's opens his book suggesting that the struggle of all

0:04:05.960 --> 0:04:09.640
<v Speaker 1>of human history has been the struggle between the oppressor

0:04:09.640 --> 0:04:13.160
<v Speaker 1>and the oppressed, and he just arbitrarily states that the

0:04:13.240 --> 0:04:15.280
<v Speaker 1>new version of the oppressor and the oppressed is the

0:04:15.400 --> 0:04:19.520
<v Speaker 1>propertied people, so the bourgeoisie versus the unpropertied people, so

0:04:19.600 --> 0:04:23.320
<v Speaker 1>the workers, the proletariat. And it's such a like vague

0:04:23.880 --> 0:04:28.760
<v Speaker 1>arbitrary definition of like rich verse is poor. And what

0:04:28.800 --> 0:04:31.000
<v Speaker 1>we sort of come out the gates with is no,

0:04:31.000 --> 0:04:36.400
<v Speaker 1>no, no no. The struggle has always existed amongst all sorts

0:04:36.400 --> 0:04:39.760
<v Speaker 1>of different classes. I mean, the struggle exists between your

0:04:39.800 --> 0:04:42.520
<v Speaker 1>morning self and your afternoon self, between what you want

0:04:42.520 --> 0:04:44.480
<v Speaker 1>to do with work. It exists with your friends, your family,

0:04:44.520 --> 0:04:49.000
<v Speaker 1>and everyone. So we suggest that there's probably two ideas here.

0:04:49.080 --> 0:04:53.520
<v Speaker 1>One is that the struggle is between the the collective

0:04:54.000 --> 0:04:57.240
<v Speaker 1>and you know, this sort of coercive nature of the

0:04:57.279 --> 0:05:00.280
<v Speaker 1>madness of crowds, and the individual who wants to claim

0:05:00.320 --> 0:05:05.200
<v Speaker 1>autonomy and be sovereign and assert his will. So that's

0:05:05.240 --> 0:05:07.919
<v Speaker 1>kind of one access of the struggle. And then the

0:05:07.920 --> 0:05:10.200
<v Speaker 1>other one is what I would think is the deepest

0:05:10.200 --> 0:05:16.359
<v Speaker 1>struggle in living life and attaining any form of wealth

0:05:16.440 --> 0:05:21.919
<v Speaker 1>or resources, which is the choice between acquiring said resources

0:05:21.960 --> 0:05:25.720
<v Speaker 1>through cooperative means or through coercive means, or another way

0:05:25.720 --> 0:05:29.680
<v Speaker 1>to put that, through economic means, which is the cooperative method,

0:05:30.000 --> 0:05:33.479
<v Speaker 1>or through political means, which is the coercive method, And

0:05:33.520 --> 0:05:35.200
<v Speaker 1>I think that is sort of like one of the

0:05:35.200 --> 0:05:37.120
<v Speaker 1>first things we come out the gate with is that

0:05:37.120 --> 0:05:39.320
<v Speaker 1>that's the real struggle. Like it's not about you know,

0:05:39.360 --> 0:05:42.920
<v Speaker 1>one group versus another, It's about do you, you know,

0:05:42.960 --> 0:05:45.360
<v Speaker 1>move forward in life by beating someone over their head

0:05:45.400 --> 0:05:48.920
<v Speaker 1>and taking their stuff or do you uh co operate

0:05:49.000 --> 0:05:51.400
<v Speaker 1>with it? So is that the real struggle? So is

0:05:51.440 --> 0:05:53.960
<v Speaker 1>that regardless of what other class to maybe and so

0:05:54.040 --> 0:05:57.640
<v Speaker 1>he arbitrary defines two different classes rich and poor. Today

0:05:57.720 --> 0:06:00.919
<v Speaker 1>cultural Marxism says we're all pitted against each other different racist,

0:06:00.960 --> 0:06:04.360
<v Speaker 1>sex as, genders, etcetera. But then are you saying that,

0:06:04.920 --> 0:06:09.320
<v Speaker 1>then regardless of which class or which identity you fall within,

0:06:09.720 --> 0:06:11.960
<v Speaker 1>you can still decide whether you want to be collaborative

0:06:12.040 --> 0:06:14.640
<v Speaker 1>or coercive, if you want to work with each other

0:06:14.720 --> 0:06:19.080
<v Speaker 1>or not. Well, let's let's think about it. So, you know,

0:06:19.160 --> 0:06:26.720
<v Speaker 1>you're One of the beauties of economics is that historically,

0:06:26.760 --> 0:06:31.320
<v Speaker 1>anthropologically biologically speaking, we humans have always formed some sort

0:06:31.360 --> 0:06:33.120
<v Speaker 1>of tribe and we've got like an in group in

0:06:33.160 --> 0:06:36.280
<v Speaker 1>an outgroup. And traditionally the way we've dealt within groups

0:06:36.320 --> 0:06:39.640
<v Speaker 1>and out groups is that we've we have quite animosity.

0:06:39.640 --> 0:06:42.960
<v Speaker 1>We have animity with people in the outgroup, and we

0:06:43.040 --> 0:06:46.360
<v Speaker 1>have some sort of homogeneity and you know, more communal

0:06:46.520 --> 0:06:49.239
<v Speaker 1>relationship with people in the in group. And you need

0:06:49.240 --> 0:06:52.440
<v Speaker 1>that sort of variation because not everyone's the same. We

0:06:52.480 --> 0:06:56.120
<v Speaker 1>have different values, we have different likes and desires, etcetera. Now,

0:06:56.360 --> 0:06:59.800
<v Speaker 1>what economics allows us to do, what trade, what what

0:07:00.080 --> 0:07:04.800
<v Speaker 1>racition allows us to do, is we can actually maintain

0:07:04.880 --> 0:07:07.240
<v Speaker 1>these in groups. We can maintain some homogeneity, but we

0:07:07.279 --> 0:07:10.440
<v Speaker 1>can cooperate. We can trade with people that we may

0:07:10.440 --> 0:07:14.440
<v Speaker 1>not like, that we may not want to be in

0:07:14.480 --> 0:07:18.480
<v Speaker 1>the same group with. And we can also live as

0:07:18.520 --> 0:07:21.880
<v Speaker 1>more multidimensional beings, meaning that we can be part of

0:07:21.920 --> 0:07:24.080
<v Speaker 1>all sorts of different groups. And that's a big piece.

0:07:24.280 --> 0:07:26.560
<v Speaker 1>We need something from another group, yeah, exactly, we need

0:07:26.600 --> 0:07:29.360
<v Speaker 1>something from someone else, we just trade, we cooperate, and

0:07:29.800 --> 0:07:33.840
<v Speaker 1>that's like a pillar of uh, you know, a functional

0:07:33.920 --> 0:07:38.559
<v Speaker 1>civilization versus going and just taking other people's stuff. Yeah,

0:07:38.600 --> 0:07:41.560
<v Speaker 1>because you think you deserve. Yeah, Like, I mean I

0:07:41.640 --> 0:07:43.920
<v Speaker 1>have like my friends I serve with, and like that's

0:07:43.920 --> 0:07:45.920
<v Speaker 1>a whole culture on its own, and like if you're

0:07:45.960 --> 0:07:47.960
<v Speaker 1>either in or you're out on that sort of culture,

0:07:48.040 --> 0:07:50.680
<v Speaker 1>that's like pretty deep to get into that and you're

0:07:50.840 --> 0:07:52.440
<v Speaker 1>you're either on the outside or you're on the inside

0:07:52.440 --> 0:07:54.000
<v Speaker 1>of that. But then like I have different friends that

0:07:54.040 --> 0:07:55.640
<v Speaker 1>I might go ride mountain bikes with or and then

0:07:55.640 --> 0:07:56.680
<v Speaker 1>I have a different set of friends that I got

0:07:56.720 --> 0:07:59.119
<v Speaker 1>write your Bikes with. They're a little bit more open,

0:07:59.280 --> 0:08:01.400
<v Speaker 1>not as not as tight en it as the surfer group.

0:08:01.400 --> 0:08:03.720
<v Speaker 1>But they're completely different group of people. But I want

0:08:03.720 --> 0:08:05.400
<v Speaker 1>to align with the motocross people. I want to alyn

0:08:05.400 --> 0:08:07.400
<v Speaker 1>with the surf people. Then I have like my business friends,

0:08:07.440 --> 0:08:09.120
<v Speaker 1>so that we have like the bitcoin crowd, and I

0:08:09.160 --> 0:08:10.840
<v Speaker 1>have all my bitcoin people and we'll go hang out

0:08:10.840 --> 0:08:12.440
<v Speaker 1>with them. And those are just different groups and I

0:08:12.480 --> 0:08:14.000
<v Speaker 1>could align with any one of them, but I don't

0:08:14.000 --> 0:08:15.760
<v Speaker 1>want to be static and stuck in any one of

0:08:15.760 --> 0:08:19.320
<v Speaker 1>those groups either. M hmm. Kind of like that, right.

0:08:20.280 --> 0:08:27.400
<v Speaker 1>So I think that malleability or that trans transmutability is important.

0:08:27.400 --> 0:08:30.480
<v Speaker 1>And then this is why identity politics doesn't work, because

0:08:30.560 --> 0:08:33.800
<v Speaker 1>what happens is we And this is probably another big

0:08:33.800 --> 0:08:35.719
<v Speaker 1>idea of the book, and this is maybe not a

0:08:35.800 --> 0:08:40.959
<v Speaker 1>unique idea, but it's that one must define an individual

0:08:41.400 --> 0:08:47.680
<v Speaker 1>by their individual behavior, not the skin, color, tone, or

0:08:47.920 --> 0:08:51.280
<v Speaker 1>supposed group that they're in. And then blanket extend that

0:08:51.720 --> 0:08:54.679
<v Speaker 1>to the individual themselves, because that number one, it's unfair

0:08:54.720 --> 0:08:56.960
<v Speaker 1>on the individual. But number two, it's just false. It's

0:08:57.000 --> 0:09:00.280
<v Speaker 1>just it's just not how it works. Yeah, I want

0:09:00.320 --> 0:09:03.040
<v Speaker 1>to I want to explore how this fits into maybe

0:09:03.080 --> 0:09:04.839
<v Speaker 1>some of the what I talked about on the on

0:09:04.880 --> 0:09:07.520
<v Speaker 1>the radio, which is this decentralized revolution. So this is

0:09:07.840 --> 0:09:12.320
<v Speaker 1>obviously it's a centralizing theory of Marxism, and I think

0:09:12.320 --> 0:09:14.560
<v Speaker 1>we're pushing back on individualism, which is more of a

0:09:14.640 --> 0:09:17.040
<v Speaker 1>decentralizing theories. We'll talk about that in a minute. You're

0:09:17.080 --> 0:09:19.360
<v Speaker 1>listening to the Mark ma Show. We're talking about, of course,

0:09:19.400 --> 0:09:22.200
<v Speaker 1>each and every week, the decentralized Revolution. We're talking about

0:09:22.040 --> 0:09:25.440
<v Speaker 1>it to the lens of politics, finance, and technology. And

0:09:25.480 --> 0:09:27.640
<v Speaker 1>I'm in the studio right now with Alex Fetzki talking

0:09:27.640 --> 0:09:30.040
<v Speaker 1>about the brand new book, The Uncommonist Manifesto and how

0:09:30.040 --> 0:09:32.000
<v Speaker 1>it fits into that. We're back with more in a minute.

0:09:32.000 --> 0:09:34.439
<v Speaker 1>Don't go away, we'll be right back. All right, Welcome back.

0:09:34.440 --> 0:09:36.760
<v Speaker 1>You are listening to the Mark mo Show talking about

0:09:36.760 --> 0:09:39.920
<v Speaker 1>the decentralized Revolution, talking about the way the world is

0:09:40.000 --> 0:09:44.199
<v Speaker 1>swinging from a central system into a decentralized system. Of course,

0:09:44.200 --> 0:09:46.880
<v Speaker 1>we're talking about bitcoin and looking at through the lens

0:09:46.880 --> 0:09:49.719
<v Speaker 1>of politics, finance, and technology. And today I'm in the

0:09:49.760 --> 0:09:51.680
<v Speaker 1>studio with Alex Fetzki. You can find on on Twitter

0:09:51.760 --> 0:09:55.040
<v Speaker 1>at s Fetzky Rights. He's the co author of my

0:09:55.200 --> 0:09:57.560
<v Speaker 1>new book. Were co authors together in the new book

0:09:57.559 --> 0:10:02.000
<v Speaker 1>called The Uncommunist Manifesto, and I talked about these topics

0:10:02.040 --> 0:10:04.560
<v Speaker 1>through the lens of politics, finance, and technology. And the

0:10:04.600 --> 0:10:07.840
<v Speaker 1>original Communist Manifesto is of course talking about that is

0:10:08.120 --> 0:10:11.600
<v Speaker 1>one of the most read books in political science, politics

0:10:11.720 --> 0:10:15.280
<v Speaker 1>and economics. UM. It doesn't talk about technology, but it

0:10:15.320 --> 0:10:17.840
<v Speaker 1>was written at a time when technology was changing the world,

0:10:18.240 --> 0:10:20.240
<v Speaker 1>and so I think it hits on those three levers.

0:10:21.240 --> 0:10:24.480
<v Speaker 1>And we've rewritten that book to come up with some

0:10:24.559 --> 0:10:27.839
<v Speaker 1>better ideas for this. UM. You know, Alex, one thing

0:10:27.880 --> 0:10:29.640
<v Speaker 1>that I've seen. I just did this big video on

0:10:29.640 --> 0:10:31.959
<v Speaker 1>my YouTube channel and I talked about how these E

0:10:32.160 --> 0:10:37.720
<v Speaker 1>s G narratives are nothing new and how um the

0:10:37.720 --> 0:10:39.760
<v Speaker 1>attack we've seen on Sri Lanka with the farmers and

0:10:39.880 --> 0:10:42.680
<v Speaker 1>fertilizers specifically in the farmland and owns in Holland and

0:10:42.679 --> 0:10:45.000
<v Speaker 1>now even just to Judeau in Canada, and it's the

0:10:45.000 --> 0:10:47.199
<v Speaker 1>same thing. And then I showed how the same thing

0:10:47.240 --> 0:10:50.760
<v Speaker 1>happened in Stalin when he attacked the farmers and took

0:10:50.760 --> 0:10:52.280
<v Speaker 1>away their ability to go food, And the same thing

0:10:52.280 --> 0:10:54.400
<v Speaker 1>with Mao and you always attacked the farmers and take

0:10:54.400 --> 0:10:57.600
<v Speaker 1>away their food, and then what happens people start to death. Um,

0:10:57.600 --> 0:10:59.320
<v Speaker 1>And I get all these comments and the saying, yeah,

0:10:59.360 --> 0:11:02.960
<v Speaker 1>but you're you have this understanding of socialism and communism

0:11:03.040 --> 0:11:05.240
<v Speaker 1>that you're talking about communism, you're not talking about socialism,

0:11:05.280 --> 0:11:10.840
<v Speaker 1>and they want to go into that type of I'm like, look, man, communism, socialism, fascism,

0:11:10.920 --> 0:11:12.880
<v Speaker 1>whatever you want to call it, it's all the same

0:11:12.880 --> 0:11:16.520
<v Speaker 1>to me, collectivism. I mean, what's what's your take on that? Yeah,

0:11:16.520 --> 0:11:22.040
<v Speaker 1>it's all a centralizing tendency. Now, you look at where

0:11:22.040 --> 0:11:25.760
<v Speaker 1>does centralization work, and it's a it's a it's a

0:11:25.760 --> 0:11:31.560
<v Speaker 1>function of scale. In the home you have, like you know,

0:11:31.600 --> 0:11:36.280
<v Speaker 1>the father is the centralizing force. He is the the breadwinner,

0:11:36.440 --> 0:11:40.520
<v Speaker 1>the you know, the prime property owner, and within his domain,

0:11:41.520 --> 0:11:45.920
<v Speaker 1>he has the perfect right to tell his children, you know,

0:11:45.960 --> 0:11:47.800
<v Speaker 1>what to do, what they can't do, et cetera, particularly

0:11:47.800 --> 0:11:50.840
<v Speaker 1>when they're growing up. Now, as the children become adults,

0:11:51.600 --> 0:11:54.760
<v Speaker 1>the owners starts to fall on them to become the

0:11:54.840 --> 0:11:57.600
<v Speaker 1>decision makers of their own lives and then take their

0:11:57.679 --> 0:12:02.680
<v Speaker 1>life outside of that domain. Right now, Centralization sort of

0:12:02.720 --> 0:12:08.320
<v Speaker 1>implies that the constituents that you're managing don't have the

0:12:08.360 --> 0:12:11.480
<v Speaker 1>maturity to make decisions on their own. And this is

0:12:11.520 --> 0:12:15.480
<v Speaker 1>one of the big takeaways of whether it's socialism, communism,

0:12:15.600 --> 0:12:17.480
<v Speaker 1>or all of them, that they're all predicated on this

0:12:17.559 --> 0:12:21.880
<v Speaker 1>idea that without some sort of authority in the middle

0:12:22.440 --> 0:12:25.120
<v Speaker 1>um you people would die of starvation, like you know,

0:12:25.480 --> 0:12:27.520
<v Speaker 1>kind of and and Frederick Bastia talks about this in

0:12:27.600 --> 0:12:31.760
<v Speaker 1>his book. It's like these the bureaucrats of the politicos

0:12:31.760 --> 0:12:34.960
<v Speaker 1>out there just have this sense that if they didn't

0:12:35.000 --> 0:12:37.400
<v Speaker 1>grow the food, we would somehow die of starvation, Like

0:12:37.440 --> 0:12:39.360
<v Speaker 1>if they didn't tell us what to wear, like we

0:12:39.360 --> 0:12:41.800
<v Speaker 1>would all be running around naked. If they didn't know

0:12:41.840 --> 0:12:44.439
<v Speaker 1>tell us to build houses and you know, build regulations

0:12:44.440 --> 0:12:46.319
<v Speaker 1>with that stuff, we would somehow be Well. We see

0:12:46.360 --> 0:12:48.680
<v Speaker 1>it even even today, where it's all these people that

0:12:48.679 --> 0:12:51.439
<v Speaker 1>are like, well, if the government doesn't doesn't doesn't tax

0:12:51.520 --> 0:12:53.400
<v Speaker 1>us and steal our money, who's going to help the poor,

0:12:53.400 --> 0:12:56.760
<v Speaker 1>Who's going to help the less fortunate? Same same thing, Yeah,

0:12:57.000 --> 0:13:01.959
<v Speaker 1>it is it's the like we never it's I think

0:13:02.000 --> 0:13:05.240
<v Speaker 1>it's tied to just the I think it's a pathology

0:13:05.480 --> 0:13:09.320
<v Speaker 1>of of the of the person. Right. So people who

0:13:09.640 --> 0:13:12.080
<v Speaker 1>and you've used this example before, it's like someone who

0:13:12.120 --> 0:13:16.640
<v Speaker 1>wouldn't help a poor person themselves then projects that on

0:13:16.679 --> 0:13:20.480
<v Speaker 1>the rest of the world and assumes that no one would. Um. Also,

0:13:20.679 --> 0:13:23.680
<v Speaker 1>people who lack self discipline and self control, like you

0:13:23.720 --> 0:13:26.200
<v Speaker 1>look at these people and you know the casting guy

0:13:26.320 --> 0:13:31.400
<v Speaker 1>from the international settlements, like he's a he's a physical

0:13:31.440 --> 0:13:35.400
<v Speaker 1>example of lack of self control. And they project this

0:13:35.679 --> 0:13:39.680
<v Speaker 1>own internal inability to maintain and manage their own lives

0:13:39.720 --> 0:13:42.760
<v Speaker 1>on everybody else, and then they try and impose control.

0:13:42.840 --> 0:13:48.520
<v Speaker 1>So they have this very low ah faith or belief

0:13:49.280 --> 0:13:53.640
<v Speaker 1>in the intelligence, the capability, and the ingenuity of the

0:13:53.720 --> 0:13:56.680
<v Speaker 1>human species in general. So they believe they're morons. Everyone's

0:13:56.679 --> 0:14:00.240
<v Speaker 1>a moron. So we need to build a a pig

0:14:00.240 --> 0:14:06.520
<v Speaker 1>pen essentially and cattle them all in. Um ridiculous, you know. Um,

0:14:06.800 --> 0:14:10.520
<v Speaker 1>I think I think there's some truth to that though, Right,

0:14:10.559 --> 0:14:13.280
<v Speaker 1>So the majority of people don't think through these things

0:14:13.320 --> 0:14:17.200
<v Speaker 1>and and and maybe can't make the best decisions. Um,

0:14:17.240 --> 0:14:18.920
<v Speaker 1>But that doesn't mean we should force them to I

0:14:18.960 --> 0:14:22.320
<v Speaker 1>think maybe it's through like influence, So influence I made

0:14:22.360 --> 0:14:26.920
<v Speaker 1>the statement before, like influence versus power. So like, um,

0:14:26.960 --> 0:14:29.160
<v Speaker 1>I could be in the best shape in the world,

0:14:29.320 --> 0:14:32.800
<v Speaker 1>and I could be living that as an example, and

0:14:32.920 --> 0:14:35.800
<v Speaker 1>anybody who would like to model what I've done with

0:14:35.840 --> 0:14:38.640
<v Speaker 1>my physical fitness for example, Hey, here's my plan, and

0:14:38.680 --> 0:14:42.400
<v Speaker 1>you're welcome to have it. But I'm not forcing anybody

0:14:42.440 --> 0:14:45.880
<v Speaker 1>to participate in that. So I think that's influence. And

0:14:46.520 --> 0:14:48.080
<v Speaker 1>but then if if we go a little bit further,

0:14:48.200 --> 0:14:50.000
<v Speaker 1>so then you talked about like in a household sit

0:14:50.040 --> 0:14:52.640
<v Speaker 1>a little bit further, Let's say that I started a

0:14:52.760 --> 0:14:55.480
<v Speaker 1>new community and I said, well, anybody's in this community,

0:14:55.480 --> 0:14:58.480
<v Speaker 1>I want them to be athletes because we get together

0:14:58.520 --> 0:15:01.440
<v Speaker 1>on weekends and we do sporting events whatever, um. And

0:15:01.440 --> 0:15:04.320
<v Speaker 1>then so I could control maybe this one area, but

0:15:04.600 --> 0:15:07.960
<v Speaker 1>I'm not forcing anybody because people could willingly opt into that.

0:15:08.280 --> 0:15:09.920
<v Speaker 1>But then they could also opt out of that at

0:15:09.960 --> 0:15:13.360
<v Speaker 1>the same time. So if it's done on a smaller scale,

0:15:13.400 --> 0:15:15.760
<v Speaker 1>then you think it's okay if people are able to

0:15:15.760 --> 0:15:21.360
<v Speaker 1>opt out. Influence is an interesting thing. We're always influencing someone.

0:15:21.720 --> 0:15:26.800
<v Speaker 1>I think leaders particularly defined by having a greater influence

0:15:27.360 --> 0:15:30.520
<v Speaker 1>of more people than non leaders, right. I think that, like,

0:15:30.560 --> 0:15:32.480
<v Speaker 1>if we had to really distill what the definition of

0:15:32.480 --> 0:15:34.160
<v Speaker 1>a leader is, that's what it is. It's someone who

0:15:34.920 --> 0:15:38.160
<v Speaker 1>shows by example and has influence over others. And they

0:15:38.160 --> 0:15:42.280
<v Speaker 1>say the best leaders lead from behind. They lead by example, right,

0:15:42.480 --> 0:15:46.520
<v Speaker 1>not by in front? Uh No, well from behind right,

0:15:46.600 --> 0:15:49.160
<v Speaker 1>leading by example, like by by being the servant, right.

0:15:49.160 --> 0:15:52.440
<v Speaker 1>I mean if you look at in in front, whatever

0:15:52.480 --> 0:15:54.520
<v Speaker 1>you want to call it, but not from on top,

0:15:54.720 --> 0:15:57.280
<v Speaker 1>but maybe side by side. Right, So even if you

0:15:57.280 --> 0:15:59.880
<v Speaker 1>look at the you know, look throughout history, like the

0:16:00.080 --> 0:16:03.680
<v Speaker 1>king would typically go into battle with the people, so

0:16:04.000 --> 0:16:05.640
<v Speaker 1>whatever you want to call it, and I guess they

0:16:05.680 --> 0:16:07.920
<v Speaker 1>would kind of lead from behind. But what I meant

0:16:08.000 --> 0:16:13.040
<v Speaker 1>is by example as opposed to by decree. Correct, And

0:16:13.360 --> 0:16:16.440
<v Speaker 1>that example piece I mean that ties into ideas like

0:16:16.440 --> 0:16:19.360
<v Speaker 1>skin in the game, et cetera. Is that it's not

0:16:19.800 --> 0:16:22.840
<v Speaker 1>making a decision and enforcing something on somebody else. Like

0:16:22.880 --> 0:16:25.280
<v Speaker 1>I just saw a video clip that came out about

0:16:25.360 --> 0:16:29.320
<v Speaker 1>the the guy and I don't even know how I

0:16:29.320 --> 0:16:32.960
<v Speaker 1>should mention this, but it's the World Economic for not

0:16:33.000 --> 0:16:35.640
<v Speaker 1>the World Economic From but the World Health Organization. Who's

0:16:35.680 --> 0:16:40.680
<v Speaker 1>the Ethiopian Yeah, that's it, and they literally just asked him,

0:16:40.680 --> 0:16:44.520
<v Speaker 1>They're like, you know, have you taken your doos yet?

0:16:44.600 --> 0:16:48.320
<v Speaker 1>And his response was that I'm Ethiopian, I come from

0:16:48.320 --> 0:16:51.080
<v Speaker 1>a poor country, and because it's not available there yet,

0:16:51.080 --> 0:16:54.840
<v Speaker 1>I've decided not to. You've got to be kidding me.

0:16:57.440 --> 0:17:01.400
<v Speaker 1>So so, but that that's that's leading, non example, right,

0:17:01.440 --> 0:17:04.200
<v Speaker 1>and that that's that's not leading. That is literally decree.

0:17:04.280 --> 0:17:08.359
<v Speaker 1>That is literally what we know deep down is fake

0:17:08.400 --> 0:17:11.640
<v Speaker 1>and fraudulent. But that's sort of how the power structures

0:17:11.640 --> 0:17:16.440
<v Speaker 1>are arranged at the moment. Yeah, crazy, you know one

0:17:16.480 --> 0:17:21.040
<v Speaker 1>thing that you know one thing that I'm encouraged for

0:17:21.040 --> 0:17:22.880
<v Speaker 1>this book, And I think the point we gave it

0:17:22.960 --> 0:17:25.360
<v Speaker 1>is actually a matter of fact, just today, based off

0:17:25.359 --> 0:17:27.159
<v Speaker 1>of that video I put out the other day. Just

0:17:27.240 --> 0:17:28.639
<v Speaker 1>today I got somebody who hit me up in the

0:17:28.720 --> 0:17:31.200
<v Speaker 1>d M S and said, um, hey, I was talking

0:17:31.240 --> 0:17:33.760
<v Speaker 1>to my buddy, I'll talk to someone I know, and

0:17:33.840 --> 0:17:36.520
<v Speaker 1>they were telling me that they think communism is such

0:17:36.520 --> 0:17:40.080
<v Speaker 1>a better system and I was completely shocked. They would

0:17:40.080 --> 0:17:42.760
<v Speaker 1>say that, could you give me a couple of talking

0:17:42.800 --> 0:17:46.240
<v Speaker 1>points that I should come back with. Okay, well you

0:17:46.280 --> 0:17:49.359
<v Speaker 1>could start with what you were shocked by, Like what

0:17:49.520 --> 0:17:51.760
<v Speaker 1>is that you know, like start there, but like people

0:17:51.800 --> 0:17:56.080
<v Speaker 1>just can't even seem to grasp um these topics or

0:17:56.119 --> 0:17:58.919
<v Speaker 1>how to go through them. I haven't responded to him

0:17:58.920 --> 0:18:00.359
<v Speaker 1>me yet, but maybe we could talk through some of

0:18:00.400 --> 0:18:02.119
<v Speaker 1>that stuff when we get back. You're listening to the

0:18:02.160 --> 0:18:04.399
<v Speaker 1>Mark Moa Show. We're talking about the Decentralized Revolution. I'm

0:18:04.400 --> 0:18:07.719
<v Speaker 1>in the studio with Alex Fetzki, my co author of

0:18:07.760 --> 0:18:11.200
<v Speaker 1>the brand new book, the The Uncommunist Manifesto on Amazon

0:18:11.400 --> 0:18:13.119
<v Speaker 1>right now this week. Check it out. We'll be back

0:18:13.160 --> 0:18:15.359
<v Speaker 1>with that more in a minute. Don't go away, all right,

0:18:15.359 --> 0:18:17.560
<v Speaker 1>welcome back. You are listening to the Mark Moa Show.

0:18:17.560 --> 0:18:20.520
<v Speaker 1>We're talking about the decentralized Revolution. Of course, I'm talking

0:18:20.560 --> 0:18:24.440
<v Speaker 1>about bitcoin. I'm looking at it through the lens of politics, finance,

0:18:24.440 --> 0:18:28.200
<v Speaker 1>and technology. And today I'm in the studio with Alex Fetzki,

0:18:28.359 --> 0:18:30.800
<v Speaker 1>is my co author on a brand new book we

0:18:30.880 --> 0:18:33.600
<v Speaker 1>released this week. It's on Amazon, go check it out.

0:18:33.640 --> 0:18:37.920
<v Speaker 1>It's called The Uncommunist Manifesto, not not the Communist It's

0:18:38.000 --> 0:18:42.320
<v Speaker 1>the Uncommunist Manifesto. And it's a book that's been written

0:18:42.680 --> 0:18:46.760
<v Speaker 1>about politics, finance, and technology, but from a different lens,

0:18:46.840 --> 0:18:50.159
<v Speaker 1>so to speak, more of a philosophical lens. Now Alex

0:18:50.240 --> 0:18:53.840
<v Speaker 1>before before the break, we're talking about um people who

0:18:54.040 --> 0:18:56.800
<v Speaker 1>um they hear they hear people saying that, oh, Marxism

0:18:56.920 --> 0:19:01.439
<v Speaker 1>or communism is so great. Um, and uh, maybe they

0:19:01.480 --> 0:19:04.359
<v Speaker 1>think it's not, but they're not really sure why it's

0:19:04.400 --> 0:19:07.640
<v Speaker 1>not or how to respond to that. And I think

0:19:07.680 --> 0:19:09.879
<v Speaker 1>this book, I think is is are The goal is

0:19:09.920 --> 0:19:11.560
<v Speaker 1>to kind of wake people up to better ideas and

0:19:11.560 --> 0:19:13.800
<v Speaker 1>give them some of that. But what would you say

0:19:13.840 --> 0:19:18.120
<v Speaker 1>to somebody who's like asking some questions like that? Well,

0:19:18.160 --> 0:19:22.199
<v Speaker 1>I think I think there's a couple things that people

0:19:22.200 --> 0:19:25.640
<v Speaker 1>who trying to assert communism and socialism is a good

0:19:25.640 --> 0:19:28.880
<v Speaker 1>idea generally cling to. And one that came to mind

0:19:28.880 --> 0:19:30.320
<v Speaker 1>as we were talking, and I'm just going to give

0:19:30.320 --> 0:19:31.520
<v Speaker 1>it a name. I'm going to call it the Star

0:19:31.560 --> 0:19:39.639
<v Speaker 1>Trek syndrome. Is this fantasy that somehow technological evolution is

0:19:39.680 --> 0:19:42.520
<v Speaker 1>going to transform everything and will come to this utopian

0:19:43.240 --> 0:19:46.680
<v Speaker 1>version of the future where we don't need money anymore. Like,

0:19:46.840 --> 0:19:49.240
<v Speaker 1>why would you need money when you have that what's

0:19:49.240 --> 0:19:52.760
<v Speaker 1>that the replicator right in Star Trek? You put anything

0:19:52.760 --> 0:19:56.359
<v Speaker 1>in there and it creates it for you. And what

0:19:57.520 --> 0:20:02.119
<v Speaker 1>that sort of utopian dream fails to realize is that

0:20:02.160 --> 0:20:05.280
<v Speaker 1>there's a thing, a pistik little thing called time, and

0:20:06.400 --> 0:20:11.520
<v Speaker 1>time flows uni directionally like it flows forward, and that's

0:20:11.560 --> 0:20:15.919
<v Speaker 1>the one thing you can't stop, pause, rewind, at least

0:20:16.440 --> 0:20:19.040
<v Speaker 1>not for the next hundred thousand years. Maybe we'll figure

0:20:19.040 --> 0:20:21.320
<v Speaker 1>out teleportation one day, but you know that that's a

0:20:21.400 --> 0:20:23.560
<v Speaker 1>very different world. So for now, for the next hundred

0:20:23.600 --> 0:20:26.639
<v Speaker 1>thousand years, let's just assume that time is fixed and

0:20:26.720 --> 0:20:29.159
<v Speaker 1>finite and it's moving in a certain direction, and as

0:20:29.240 --> 0:20:33.480
<v Speaker 1>a result, we are going to need to prioritize things.

0:20:33.480 --> 0:20:35.440
<v Speaker 1>So even if we could, let's say, in the next

0:20:35.560 --> 0:20:39.760
<v Speaker 1>hundred years, create the replicator for the next years, beyond

0:20:39.760 --> 0:20:42.920
<v Speaker 1>that years, we're still going to have the issue of time.

0:20:42.960 --> 0:20:45.320
<v Speaker 1>So it's still even if we had complete abundance of

0:20:45.400 --> 0:20:47.560
<v Speaker 1>energy and materials, we would still need to order things

0:20:47.600 --> 0:20:51.320
<v Speaker 1>in some sense, so we still need to have correct

0:20:52.040 --> 0:20:55.520
<v Speaker 1>This is once again why the existence of something like

0:20:55.600 --> 0:20:59.960
<v Speaker 1>money is necessary. Like the technology of money enables us

0:21:00.080 --> 0:21:04.520
<v Speaker 1>prioritize And how do we utilize that technology. Well, we

0:21:04.680 --> 0:21:09.760
<v Speaker 1>utilize it as a means to get information in the marketplace,

0:21:09.840 --> 0:21:12.200
<v Speaker 1>which is prices, and the only way to do that

0:21:12.680 --> 0:21:17.680
<v Speaker 1>is to enable the information flow to occur freely. Communism

0:21:17.760 --> 0:21:20.320
<v Speaker 1>wants to do away with all of that, get away,

0:21:20.600 --> 0:21:24.280
<v Speaker 1>do away with prices, set everything stagnant, and create this

0:21:24.359 --> 0:21:28.879
<v Speaker 1>perfectly engineered closed system that doesn't involve prices, economics and

0:21:28.920 --> 0:21:33.080
<v Speaker 1>all of this. They're living in a fantasy land. They

0:21:33.119 --> 0:21:35.960
<v Speaker 1>think that we can live outside of the bounds of time,

0:21:36.480 --> 0:21:38.560
<v Speaker 1>never gonna happen. It just doesn't work like that. So

0:21:38.560 --> 0:21:41.639
<v Speaker 1>so the very premises, and I think this sort of

0:21:42.920 --> 0:21:45.479
<v Speaker 1>whether you read Marks's work or whether you read any

0:21:45.520 --> 0:21:50.120
<v Speaker 1>socialist communist people that have come after him, they all

0:21:50.800 --> 0:21:54.600
<v Speaker 1>seem to basically be these utopians that think that we

0:21:54.680 --> 0:22:01.640
<v Speaker 1>can somehow escape the physical constraints of reality and live

0:22:01.840 --> 0:22:06.360
<v Speaker 1>outside of these, uh you know, these very real bounds,

0:22:06.600 --> 0:22:09.400
<v Speaker 1>and and they don't work. So everything kind of stems

0:22:09.440 --> 0:22:12.600
<v Speaker 1>them down from there. It's like whether it's you know,

0:22:12.680 --> 0:22:15.639
<v Speaker 1>the stupid ideas like the rich get richer and the

0:22:15.640 --> 0:22:18.959
<v Speaker 1>pool get poorer somehow in capitalism, you know, we need

0:22:19.000 --> 0:22:21.520
<v Speaker 1>communism to fix that, like everything else has to break down,

0:22:21.520 --> 0:22:23.840
<v Speaker 1>which we can dig into those, but I think that's

0:22:23.840 --> 0:22:27.160
<v Speaker 1>the first point is that the utopian and they don't

0:22:27.200 --> 0:22:28.919
<v Speaker 1>understand that time is always going to be here and

0:22:28.960 --> 0:22:31.320
<v Speaker 1>we have to contend with that somehow. I think, just

0:22:31.560 --> 0:22:33.959
<v Speaker 1>right off the bat, the utopian there's no such thing

0:22:34.000 --> 0:22:38.080
<v Speaker 1>as that, because what my idea of utopia isn't your

0:22:38.119 --> 0:22:41.560
<v Speaker 1>idea of utopia? Maybe, so like what I want is

0:22:41.640 --> 0:22:45.639
<v Speaker 1>utopia you hate? For example, like I might want my

0:22:45.720 --> 0:22:47.359
<v Speaker 1>idea of utopia might be on might be on a

0:22:47.400 --> 0:22:50.200
<v Speaker 1>beautiful beach with like huge surf, but a lot of

0:22:50.200 --> 0:22:51.840
<v Speaker 1>people hate the beach and that would be hell for

0:22:51.880 --> 0:22:53.800
<v Speaker 1>them to be on the beach, right or for example,

0:22:53.920 --> 0:22:57.320
<v Speaker 1>So um, right off the bat, we just know that, um,

0:22:57.800 --> 0:23:01.120
<v Speaker 1>and I think what that? What that right? Their highlights

0:23:01.320 --> 0:23:05.239
<v Speaker 1>is back to the individual versus the collective. I might

0:23:05.359 --> 0:23:07.680
<v Speaker 1>love the beach, you might hate it. And so if

0:23:07.720 --> 0:23:10.520
<v Speaker 1>we assume that we're all the same, there's your your

0:23:10.520 --> 0:23:15.080
<v Speaker 1>fallacy right off the bat. Um I saw this morning.

0:23:15.080 --> 0:23:17.280
<v Speaker 1>There's a little bit on different subject, but back to

0:23:17.400 --> 0:23:20.360
<v Speaker 1>kind of like these laws of the universe. Um. There

0:23:20.440 --> 0:23:23.880
<v Speaker 1>is a cryptocurrency a game called Acts Infinity. I don't

0:23:23.880 --> 0:23:25.479
<v Speaker 1>know if you've heard of that. Actually Infinity. It got

0:23:25.480 --> 0:23:29.080
<v Speaker 1>really popular um last year and in this brand new

0:23:29.240 --> 0:23:33.520
<v Speaker 1>category called play to Earn, And basically, you play games

0:23:33.720 --> 0:23:37.920
<v Speaker 1>and you earn money. You earned cryptocurrency, so I could

0:23:38.080 --> 0:23:41.840
<v Speaker 1>UM in this game, I go mine for gold, for example,

0:23:42.119 --> 0:23:45.920
<v Speaker 1>So I got to buy UM picks and shovels. UM

0:23:46.000 --> 0:23:47.800
<v Speaker 1>I earned them by plane. And then I take the

0:23:47.800 --> 0:23:49.200
<v Speaker 1>picks and shovels and I can go earn gold. And

0:23:49.280 --> 0:23:52.000
<v Speaker 1>I earned these tokens, these cryptocurrency tokens, and then I

0:23:52.040 --> 0:23:55.400
<v Speaker 1>can go exchange those cryptocurrency tokens for money, like on exchange.

0:23:56.119 --> 0:23:59.520
<v Speaker 1>And they've they've they cracked the code and this act Infinity.

0:23:59.560 --> 0:24:01.639
<v Speaker 1>It blew up and the game got so popular, and

0:24:01.640 --> 0:24:04.119
<v Speaker 1>then in like the Philippines or wherever, they were like

0:24:04.240 --> 0:24:07.439
<v Speaker 1>hiring teams to start spending time playing video games to

0:24:07.480 --> 0:24:10.800
<v Speaker 1>earn money. And all these vcs put all this money

0:24:10.840 --> 0:24:14.840
<v Speaker 1>into the game and they finally found a way where

0:24:14.840 --> 0:24:20.440
<v Speaker 1>people can get paid for their time playing games. Wow,

0:24:20.600 --> 0:24:22.680
<v Speaker 1>how cool. Well it worked out pretty good for a

0:24:22.720 --> 0:24:24.640
<v Speaker 1>year until the Ponzi scheme right out, and now there's

0:24:24.640 --> 0:24:26.000
<v Speaker 1>no money to pay any of these people, and the

0:24:26.040 --> 0:24:28.560
<v Speaker 1>whole thing has fallen apart. And I was like, of

0:24:28.600 --> 0:24:30.840
<v Speaker 1>course it did. I've been seeing this the whole time

0:24:30.920 --> 0:24:33.840
<v Speaker 1>because they're like, but people finally were getting paid for

0:24:33.840 --> 0:24:37.840
<v Speaker 1>their time playing games, but nobody values that nobody's gonna

0:24:37.920 --> 0:24:41.480
<v Speaker 1>pay them. So like they were earning money in the game,

0:24:41.520 --> 0:24:44.960
<v Speaker 1>but it was being pumped in by vcas and they vcs.

0:24:45.080 --> 0:24:47.520
<v Speaker 1>I mean it raised whatever, hundreds of millions of dollars

0:24:47.640 --> 0:24:49.920
<v Speaker 1>from some of these top firms A sixteen or whatever, right,

0:24:50.520 --> 0:24:53.719
<v Speaker 1>and it's like these people, how far is that from reality?

0:24:54.040 --> 0:24:57.679
<v Speaker 1>Like but but yet we're continue to play being plagued

0:24:57.720 --> 0:25:00.880
<v Speaker 1>by that in real time. It seems like well it's

0:25:01.000 --> 0:25:07.359
<v Speaker 1>I mean that last bit real time. So the reality

0:25:07.400 --> 0:25:09.800
<v Speaker 1>today is not too far off from that game. You know,

0:25:09.880 --> 0:25:15.080
<v Speaker 1>You've got these politicians that basically there, Yeah, they played pretend.

0:25:15.359 --> 0:25:17.840
<v Speaker 1>It's like, yeah, just just change the number here and

0:25:17.880 --> 0:25:19.880
<v Speaker 1>you know, put a signature there and I'll say this

0:25:19.960 --> 0:25:23.880
<v Speaker 1>and make this promise here, and like all of it

0:25:23.920 --> 0:25:27.080
<v Speaker 1>is just like one big magic show. You know, it's

0:25:27.080 --> 0:25:30.160
<v Speaker 1>like a Las Vegas show and or or a game

0:25:30.280 --> 0:25:33.280
<v Speaker 1>you know in the Philippines, and you know, nothing really matters.

0:25:33.320 --> 0:25:36.080
<v Speaker 1>It's not real. And I've just finished the new article

0:25:36.119 --> 0:25:38.960
<v Speaker 1>that I'm writing for this year's edition of the Bitcoin Times.

0:25:39.000 --> 0:25:40.720
<v Speaker 1>It's going to be the Austrian edition, and I talk

0:25:40.800 --> 0:25:44.000
<v Speaker 1>about how bitcoin is the thing that makes Austrian economics

0:25:44.359 --> 0:25:47.240
<v Speaker 1>possible in a practical sense, not just the theoretical sense.

0:25:47.320 --> 0:25:50.960
<v Speaker 1>And you know in there I talk about like the

0:25:51.080 --> 0:25:55.240
<v Speaker 1>communist ideas are much like the Kingsian ideas, and that

0:25:55.800 --> 0:26:00.560
<v Speaker 1>they they're they're based on this premise of first of all,

0:26:00.600 --> 0:26:06.000
<v Speaker 1>like entropy. Like remember Keynsian was like, uh, it doesn't

0:26:06.000 --> 0:26:08.200
<v Speaker 1>matter because in the long run, world dead anyway, right,

0:26:08.600 --> 0:26:12.840
<v Speaker 1>you know, communism is academic justification for entropy. They're they're

0:26:12.840 --> 0:26:17.080
<v Speaker 1>all kind of all anti life modalities of thinking. And

0:26:17.119 --> 0:26:19.240
<v Speaker 1>it's like it doesn't matter, you know, just like let's

0:26:19.240 --> 0:26:21.199
<v Speaker 1>just burn it all up, let's use it now and

0:26:21.320 --> 0:26:23.959
<v Speaker 1>two kids and just change the ledger, change the school

0:26:24.240 --> 0:26:26.680
<v Speaker 1>print a little bit more money, uh, you know, right

0:26:26.720 --> 0:26:29.320
<v Speaker 1>in your regulation and pretend it didn't happen. And and

0:26:29.400 --> 0:26:31.800
<v Speaker 1>all based off of the premise of getting getting something

0:26:31.880 --> 0:26:35.640
<v Speaker 1>for nothing. That's it. Yeah, and that just doesn't work

0:26:35.800 --> 0:26:38.160
<v Speaker 1>in the universe. Sorry, there's no like the second lawn.

0:26:38.480 --> 0:26:42.199
<v Speaker 1>Thermodynamics holds irrespective of what politicians want to think. And

0:26:42.280 --> 0:26:45.640
<v Speaker 1>all of nature that's not humans knows that I read

0:26:45.640 --> 0:26:47.119
<v Speaker 1>a thing. I think it was just last week. And

0:26:47.160 --> 0:26:50.080
<v Speaker 1>it's like the gazelle wakes up every morning knowing if

0:26:50.080 --> 0:26:53.600
<v Speaker 1>it doesn't run faster than the fastest lion, it's dead.

0:26:54.040 --> 0:26:55.760
<v Speaker 1>And the lion wakes up in the morning knowing if

0:26:55.800 --> 0:26:58.800
<v Speaker 1>it doesn't run faster than the slowest gazelle, it's dead

0:26:59.440 --> 0:27:02.240
<v Speaker 1>and natured owes that. All right, ants save up for

0:27:02.280 --> 0:27:04.840
<v Speaker 1>the winter. We can see aunts in the Bible, it says, uh,

0:27:05.000 --> 0:27:07.679
<v Speaker 1>we can even learn lessons from the ant, you sluggard, Like,

0:27:08.320 --> 0:27:11.200
<v Speaker 1>look how it's stores. It's well, look out stores. It's

0:27:11.359 --> 0:27:13.880
<v Speaker 1>food for the winter. You know. So the whole all

0:27:14.080 --> 0:27:16.399
<v Speaker 1>all the world knows that. But somehow humans think we

0:27:16.400 --> 0:27:19.520
<v Speaker 1>can continually cheat that. Um, but we're continuing to uh

0:27:19.880 --> 0:27:22.280
<v Speaker 1>come back and see that that. Nope, as a matter

0:27:22.280 --> 0:27:24.879
<v Speaker 1>of fact, reality can smack us in the face. Um.

0:27:24.880 --> 0:27:26.720
<v Speaker 1>You're listening to the Marketma show. We're talking about the

0:27:26.720 --> 0:27:29.959
<v Speaker 1>decentralized revolution through the lens of politics, finance, and technology.

0:27:30.200 --> 0:27:32.320
<v Speaker 1>I'm in the studio with Alex Fetzky and we're talking

0:27:32.320 --> 0:27:34.280
<v Speaker 1>about our brand new book we just released called The

0:27:34.440 --> 0:27:38.080
<v Speaker 1>Uncommunist Manifesto. It's on Amazon this week. Check it out.

0:27:38.440 --> 0:27:40.400
<v Speaker 1>We'll be back with more talking about the book and

0:27:40.440 --> 0:27:42.720
<v Speaker 1>how it's decentralized in the world in a minute. Don't

0:27:42.720 --> 0:27:44.680
<v Speaker 1>go away, and we'll right back. All right, welcome back.

0:27:44.720 --> 0:27:46.720
<v Speaker 1>You're listening to the Markma Show. We're talking about the

0:27:46.720 --> 0:27:50.679
<v Speaker 1>decentralized Revolution, how the world is changing right before our

0:27:50.760 --> 0:27:53.400
<v Speaker 1>very eyes. Of course, we're talking about bitcoin and looking

0:27:53.400 --> 0:27:56.000
<v Speaker 1>at through the lens of politics, finance, and technology. I'm

0:27:56.000 --> 0:27:58.439
<v Speaker 1>in the studio today with Alex Fetzki. He's my co

0:27:58.600 --> 0:28:01.720
<v Speaker 1>author of the new book we just released and published

0:28:01.840 --> 0:28:04.600
<v Speaker 1>this week on Amazon. Go check it out, write it down.

0:28:04.680 --> 0:28:08.359
<v Speaker 1>It's called The Uncommunist Manifesto, not the Communist It's the

0:28:08.560 --> 0:28:12.320
<v Speaker 1>Uncommunist Manifesto. It's already hit best seller categories and we're

0:28:12.320 --> 0:28:14.560
<v Speaker 1>looking for people to help keep pushing it forward. So

0:28:14.680 --> 0:28:18.800
<v Speaker 1>check it out. Um, Alex. Before the break, I was saying, how, um,

0:28:18.840 --> 0:28:21.240
<v Speaker 1>you know, we keep trying to get something for nothing,

0:28:21.880 --> 0:28:24.960
<v Speaker 1>which um, but but reality keeps smacking us in the face. Now,

0:28:25.640 --> 0:28:28.399
<v Speaker 1>we also made the case for capitalism, which I think

0:28:28.440 --> 0:28:30.520
<v Speaker 1>a lot of people, um, right off the bat are

0:28:30.520 --> 0:28:32.760
<v Speaker 1>probably h they don't like that. As a matter of fact,

0:28:33.640 --> 0:28:34.960
<v Speaker 1>I told you this video I just put out. I

0:28:35.000 --> 0:28:37.600
<v Speaker 1>got a lot of comments and oh but capitalism has

0:28:37.880 --> 0:28:40.520
<v Speaker 1>um led to all these problems and capitalism has left

0:28:40.520 --> 0:28:42.880
<v Speaker 1>all these people behind and cat right, but but there's

0:28:42.920 --> 0:28:45.160
<v Speaker 1>this misunderstanding. So we so we break that down in

0:28:45.200 --> 0:28:48.080
<v Speaker 1>the book um and so I think that in itself

0:28:48.200 --> 0:28:51.920
<v Speaker 1>is worth the read. But but the put back to

0:28:52.000 --> 0:28:56.360
<v Speaker 1>the something for nothing peace. So as humans and we

0:28:56.480 --> 0:28:59.680
<v Speaker 1>make the case that that capitalism is just natural, we're

0:28:59.720 --> 0:29:04.600
<v Speaker 1>just trying to do more with less. Um. So it

0:29:04.840 --> 0:29:08.200
<v Speaker 1>is the human drive for something for nothing. Instead of

0:29:08.240 --> 0:29:11.320
<v Speaker 1>making ten trips carrying one brick at a time, how

0:29:11.360 --> 0:29:14.200
<v Speaker 1>about if I just make a wheelbarrow and carry ten

0:29:14.240 --> 0:29:17.520
<v Speaker 1>bricks at once. And so we're always trying to get

0:29:17.960 --> 0:29:22.000
<v Speaker 1>not necessarily something for nothing, but more for less. M hm.

0:29:22.480 --> 0:29:25.840
<v Speaker 1>So I mean, are those two things almost the same

0:29:25.880 --> 0:29:29.920
<v Speaker 1>but one is just a little detached from reality? Well

0:29:29.920 --> 0:29:32.040
<v Speaker 1>it is. It's and this this is where wisdom and

0:29:32.080 --> 0:29:35.920
<v Speaker 1>maturity come in, right, And this is where all of

0:29:35.920 --> 0:29:39.440
<v Speaker 1>these tendencies, like even greed for example, has a has

0:29:39.480 --> 0:29:42.080
<v Speaker 1>a light and a shadow. If there's one thing I

0:29:42.160 --> 0:29:46.080
<v Speaker 1>learned from reading Young's work was that all of these

0:29:48.480 --> 0:29:51.760
<v Speaker 1>examples of our personality and our desires and everything, like

0:29:51.840 --> 0:29:54.760
<v Speaker 1>our energy has a light and a shadow. And the

0:29:54.840 --> 0:29:58.720
<v Speaker 1>question is how are we manifesting it. The desire to

0:29:58.760 --> 0:30:01.400
<v Speaker 1>get something for nothing is always going to exist. We

0:30:01.560 --> 0:30:06.120
<v Speaker 1>were always trying to economize because remember time and energy

0:30:06.160 --> 0:30:09.600
<v Speaker 1>are scarce, like material resources are scarce. Like that. There

0:30:10.840 --> 0:30:16.480
<v Speaker 1>we want to we have a deep seated spiritual biological

0:30:16.840 --> 0:30:20.440
<v Speaker 1>it's in our dna to try and use things more efficiently,

0:30:20.720 --> 0:30:24.160
<v Speaker 1>down to the very bugs in the ground and the

0:30:24.200 --> 0:30:27.680
<v Speaker 1>fishes in the sea, like everything is trying to economize somehow.

0:30:28.160 --> 0:30:32.440
<v Speaker 1>It's it's what we do. The question is when we

0:30:32.520 --> 0:30:35.440
<v Speaker 1>start lying to ourselves. So like there's a there's a

0:30:35.480 --> 0:30:40.560
<v Speaker 1>difference between an innovation that you know, create that uses leverage,

0:30:40.560 --> 0:30:43.400
<v Speaker 1>you know, like a pulley or a lever that uses

0:30:43.560 --> 0:30:47.640
<v Speaker 1>leverage to give you an advantage in order to move

0:30:47.800 --> 0:30:53.440
<v Speaker 1>more weight across space for example, or power across time,

0:30:53.480 --> 0:30:58.440
<v Speaker 1>et cetera. That's very different doing that than m than

0:30:58.840 --> 0:31:02.160
<v Speaker 1>building a fake level of a and pretending I moved

0:31:02.240 --> 0:31:04.000
<v Speaker 1>something and then just writing on a piece of paper

0:31:04.000 --> 0:31:06.200
<v Speaker 1>and telling someone I did it because behind the scenes

0:31:06.240 --> 0:31:09.680
<v Speaker 1>the work didn't actually occur. Um And that's sort of

0:31:10.480 --> 0:31:12.520
<v Speaker 1>you know, there's a difference between a lie and an

0:31:12.560 --> 0:31:16.840
<v Speaker 1>actual uh an increase in the efficient and the effective

0:31:17.720 --> 0:31:23.040
<v Speaker 1>output of something. They both stem from the same desire though, Yeah, yeah,

0:31:23.080 --> 0:31:25.680
<v Speaker 1>so it's it's it's that it's that desire, But I

0:31:25.720 --> 0:31:28.240
<v Speaker 1>love how you said it. It's about maturity, So we

0:31:28.360 --> 0:31:30.560
<v Speaker 1>start to have we we have to learn most most

0:31:30.600 --> 0:31:32.600
<v Speaker 1>of us have to learn as we grow up what

0:31:32.880 --> 0:31:35.640
<v Speaker 1>is achievable, what we can really do, and what we

0:31:35.680 --> 0:31:38.080
<v Speaker 1>can't do. And so we're always trying to do more

0:31:38.120 --> 0:31:40.760
<v Speaker 1>with less economized as you said it, But then we

0:31:40.800 --> 0:31:42.640
<v Speaker 1>also have to know where those bounds are and the

0:31:42.640 --> 0:31:49.640
<v Speaker 1>difference of reality. UM so so good point. Um. You

0:31:49.680 --> 0:31:52.800
<v Speaker 1>talked about four main thought ideas that we had in

0:31:52.840 --> 0:31:55.280
<v Speaker 1>the book. Um, let's talk about a couple of other ones,

0:31:55.280 --> 0:31:58.040
<v Speaker 1>like why should people go get this book? What are

0:31:58.040 --> 0:31:59.400
<v Speaker 1>a couple of things they could get from this that

0:31:59.480 --> 0:32:02.480
<v Speaker 1>might help, um, go talk to other people, have conversations,

0:32:02.480 --> 0:32:06.040
<v Speaker 1>to see the world differently. Yeah. I think the other

0:32:06.040 --> 0:32:09.400
<v Speaker 1>big one was you mentioned it already, capitalism is. I

0:32:09.440 --> 0:32:15.000
<v Speaker 1>think we have a very novel approach to defining capitalism.

0:32:15.080 --> 0:32:18.120
<v Speaker 1>And what we did was most people get stuck in

0:32:19.120 --> 0:32:23.680
<v Speaker 1>the argument and the frame or the the Overton window

0:32:23.720 --> 0:32:26.280
<v Speaker 1>of trying to argue capitalism as a political modalities like

0:32:26.280 --> 0:32:29.080
<v Speaker 1>capitalism is, you know, on the right and socialism is

0:32:29.080 --> 0:32:31.800
<v Speaker 1>on the left. And we kind of came in there

0:32:31.800 --> 0:32:35.000
<v Speaker 1>and just said no, no, no, Capitalism is just the process.

0:32:35.040 --> 0:32:39.080
<v Speaker 1>It's you know, if we define capital as the scarce stuff,

0:32:39.120 --> 0:32:42.040
<v Speaker 1>so time, energy, and natural resources, and then if we

0:32:42.080 --> 0:32:46.680
<v Speaker 1>sort of define metaphysical capitalist like ideas and reputation, right

0:32:46.880 --> 0:32:51.720
<v Speaker 1>like that, like these things, like the metaphysical stuff is

0:32:51.720 --> 0:32:53.960
<v Speaker 1>is not as scarce, like you know, we can have

0:32:54.000 --> 0:32:56.240
<v Speaker 1>as many ideas as we want, but there is something

0:32:56.320 --> 0:32:59.000
<v Speaker 1>unique about them, like the way we put them together, etcetera.

0:32:59.120 --> 0:33:03.680
<v Speaker 1>So if these, if these are capital capitalism is about

0:33:03.720 --> 0:33:07.360
<v Speaker 1>how best to use them, and the two forcing functions

0:33:07.400 --> 0:33:11.800
<v Speaker 1>that we discussed in the book efficacy and efficiency. It's like,

0:33:11.840 --> 0:33:15.640
<v Speaker 1>so doing more with less and doing the right thing

0:33:16.000 --> 0:33:20.800
<v Speaker 1>is what efficacy is. And if we think about capitalism

0:33:20.800 --> 0:33:23.360
<v Speaker 1>through that lens, what we come to realize is that

0:33:23.440 --> 0:33:25.880
<v Speaker 1>we've been doing this since the beginning of time. And

0:33:25.920 --> 0:33:27.480
<v Speaker 1>I think we've said this on the show before, but

0:33:28.040 --> 0:33:31.560
<v Speaker 1>capitalism is just since we first realized that we needed

0:33:31.560 --> 0:33:37.200
<v Speaker 1>to more efficiently acquire food, and we know created stone

0:33:37.240 --> 0:33:40.080
<v Speaker 1>tools to break food apart or to throw it at

0:33:40.120 --> 0:33:42.440
<v Speaker 1>an animal and you know, cut down the amount of

0:33:42.720 --> 0:33:46.480
<v Speaker 1>energy we use in chasing the animal, and you know,

0:33:46.520 --> 0:33:48.560
<v Speaker 1>someone else creates a fire, and you know, if I've

0:33:48.560 --> 0:33:51.120
<v Speaker 1>caught the animal, and we share the animal and share

0:33:51.120 --> 0:33:53.360
<v Speaker 1>the fire, etcetera. Like there's division of labor. So like

0:33:53.400 --> 0:33:57.120
<v Speaker 1>we're always doing this. The question is is, like how

0:33:57.160 --> 0:34:01.280
<v Speaker 1>do the political bounds that sit around the process of capitalism,

0:34:01.280 --> 0:34:03.240
<v Speaker 1>like how much do they suffocate it? And you know,

0:34:03.280 --> 0:34:05.959
<v Speaker 1>we can kind of think of the political bounds as

0:34:06.000 --> 0:34:09.239
<v Speaker 1>the bank of the river, and capitalism is the flow

0:34:09.280 --> 0:34:11.800
<v Speaker 1>of the river. It's the flow of the energy it's happening.

0:34:12.280 --> 0:34:14.920
<v Speaker 1>Do we constrict it to the point that, you know,

0:34:14.960 --> 0:34:17.120
<v Speaker 1>the river runs dry? And that's what you see in

0:34:18.080 --> 0:34:22.880
<v Speaker 1>communists or centrally planned modalities, is that we we trip

0:34:23.000 --> 0:34:26.879
<v Speaker 1>over each other, creating all sorts of regulations because we

0:34:26.880 --> 0:34:30.640
<v Speaker 1>we haven't thought about where the wealth is actually coming from.

0:34:30.680 --> 0:34:32.600
<v Speaker 1>And then we try and control it and direct it

0:34:32.640 --> 0:34:35.080
<v Speaker 1>and shift the flow of the stream, and then all

0:34:35.120 --> 0:34:36.840
<v Speaker 1>of a sudden, we've destroyed the river and there's no

0:34:36.880 --> 0:34:39.440
<v Speaker 1>more water flowing, and we're wondering, oh, it's the fault

0:34:39.480 --> 0:34:43.480
<v Speaker 1>of capitalism because there's no more water flowing here. Yeah,

0:34:43.480 --> 0:34:46.600
<v Speaker 1>we see examples of that. You know. Uh, Bernie Sanders

0:34:46.719 --> 0:34:49.600
<v Speaker 1>is I'm running on a pro socialist platform. I want

0:34:49.600 --> 0:34:52.160
<v Speaker 1>to redistribute all the wealth, but yet per the capitalist

0:34:52.160 --> 0:34:55.000
<v Speaker 1>system the book says, he's written, he's become multimillionaire and

0:34:55.040 --> 0:34:57.640
<v Speaker 1>owns all these houses. That's the capitalist system that he's

0:34:57.920 --> 0:35:00.800
<v Speaker 1>talking against. Her or AOC who still you know, pushing

0:35:00.800 --> 0:35:04.040
<v Speaker 1>the socialist platform tax the rich and you know, in capitalism.

0:35:04.080 --> 0:35:06.920
<v Speaker 1>But yet she sells like T shirts for sixty bucks

0:35:06.960 --> 0:35:09.480
<v Speaker 1>on her website or whatever, right, like not just cheap

0:35:09.520 --> 0:35:11.920
<v Speaker 1>T shirts, like premium T shirts. That that's capitalism. And

0:35:11.960 --> 0:35:15.200
<v Speaker 1>so to your point, um, they they push back on

0:35:15.239 --> 0:35:16.840
<v Speaker 1>these things, they say, we don't need these things, but

0:35:16.920 --> 0:35:20.799
<v Speaker 1>they don't really understand how those things make this integral part.

0:35:21.239 --> 0:35:24.520
<v Speaker 1>And I would agree. Just to get this understand of

0:35:24.560 --> 0:35:29.239
<v Speaker 1>capitalism as we laid out, I think is probably one

0:35:29.320 --> 0:35:31.000
<v Speaker 1>of the I have to say, one of the most

0:35:31.040 --> 0:35:33.960
<v Speaker 1>important lessons in the book, because you really have to

0:35:34.160 --> 0:35:37.600
<v Speaker 1>understand how the world works, and you have to understand

0:35:37.719 --> 0:35:40.400
<v Speaker 1>the different types of capital. To your point, that we

0:35:40.440 --> 0:35:44.120
<v Speaker 1>all have everybody has capital, and then how do we

0:35:44.200 --> 0:35:45.880
<v Speaker 1>use those and then how does that work in the

0:35:45.960 --> 0:35:49.719
<v Speaker 1>greater ecosystem? And this is really uh you know, uh

0:35:49.920 --> 0:35:52.480
<v Speaker 1>first principles type thinking that then you can start to

0:35:52.520 --> 0:35:55.440
<v Speaker 1>formulate your own ideas off of as opposed to just

0:35:55.480 --> 0:35:57.880
<v Speaker 1>out there parody and headlines that you hear from Bernie Sanders.

0:35:57.920 --> 0:35:59.879
<v Speaker 1>Another thing that I saw in all these comments this week,

0:36:00.160 --> 0:36:03.640
<v Speaker 1>again because I just made these videos about socialism and collectivism,

0:36:04.239 --> 0:36:07.560
<v Speaker 1>but they would say, oh, but those Scandinavian countries are

0:36:07.719 --> 0:36:09.600
<v Speaker 1>are a socialist and look how good they are. But

0:36:09.920 --> 0:36:12.080
<v Speaker 1>all those so all those scaninan countries tell you we

0:36:12.160 --> 0:36:15.400
<v Speaker 1>are not socialist countries. They push back on that, and

0:36:15.440 --> 0:36:17.360
<v Speaker 1>so I think you need to have that better understanding.

0:36:17.440 --> 0:36:20.839
<v Speaker 1>In the book. We we have a matrix, and so

0:36:20.880 --> 0:36:24.080
<v Speaker 1>we actually have UM all the different forms of what

0:36:24.120 --> 0:36:28.759
<v Speaker 1>people think capitalism is, whether that's crony ism or colonialism,

0:36:28.840 --> 0:36:31.799
<v Speaker 1>or people say capitalism led to slavery. We have all

0:36:31.880 --> 0:36:34.200
<v Speaker 1>these different forms in there, and let me show really

0:36:34.200 --> 0:36:36.800
<v Speaker 1>what capitalism is, what it is and what it isn't

0:36:36.840 --> 0:36:38.799
<v Speaker 1>and then we compare it against all these what we

0:36:38.840 --> 0:36:42.239
<v Speaker 1>call phantom variations of capitalism. And I think just that

0:36:42.440 --> 0:36:47.080
<v Speaker 1>lesson alone UM is worth the book on itself. UM.

0:36:47.120 --> 0:36:48.560
<v Speaker 1>And then if you if you get the book on Amazon,

0:36:48.640 --> 0:36:50.879
<v Speaker 1>make sure to come back to our website Uncommunist dot

0:36:50.920 --> 0:36:53.520
<v Speaker 1>com and uh, then you can get access to a

0:36:53.520 --> 0:36:58.080
<v Speaker 1>bunch of extra materials behind the scenes, commentary, discussions, um

0:36:58.160 --> 0:37:00.359
<v Speaker 1>download all the charts, graphs, etcetera, so much to more.

0:37:00.680 --> 0:37:02.520
<v Speaker 1>You're listening to the Mark Moas Show. We're talking about,

0:37:02.560 --> 0:37:04.960
<v Speaker 1>of course, each and every week, the Decentralized Revolution, talking

0:37:04.960 --> 0:37:07.880
<v Speaker 1>about the way Bitcoin is changing the world. I'm in

0:37:07.880 --> 0:37:10.759
<v Speaker 1>the studio with Alex Swetzky, my co author of the

0:37:10.800 --> 0:37:14.040
<v Speaker 1>brand new book The Uncommon Manifesto on Amazon check it out.

0:37:14.400 --> 0:37:15.960
<v Speaker 1>That's what we got. Thanks for listening today.