1 00:00:01,960 --> 00:00:06,200 Speaker 1: Live from our nation's capital. This is Bloomberg sound On 2 00:00:07,520 --> 00:00:11,400 Speaker 1: talking about a huge issue here is investment in marginalized community. 3 00:00:11,680 --> 00:00:14,920 Speaker 1: They want to deconstructive package and cherry pick what they 4 00:00:14,960 --> 00:00:18,119 Speaker 1: like what they don't like. China is surgeon powered with 5 00:00:18,280 --> 00:00:23,360 Speaker 1: major investments. Floomberg sound On, The insiders, the influencers, the 6 00:00:23,440 --> 00:00:27,080 Speaker 1: insides fighting has Thomas again and again that he will 7 00:00:27,280 --> 00:00:30,560 Speaker 1: unite the country. Who do you think Fiden has to 8 00:00:30,640 --> 00:00:34,919 Speaker 1: watch in terms of moderate defectors in protroductor has always 9 00:00:35,000 --> 00:00:39,320 Speaker 1: been by part of funder Bloomberg sound On on Bloomberg Radio. 10 00:00:41,440 --> 00:00:44,560 Speaker 1: I'm Jack Fitzpatrick coming up on the show today. We've 11 00:00:44,600 --> 00:00:49,000 Speaker 1: got former Ambassador to Israel Daniel Kurtzer coming on. We're 12 00:00:49,040 --> 00:00:51,280 Speaker 1: going to have to talk to him about everything happening 13 00:00:51,320 --> 00:00:56,080 Speaker 1: in Israel with apparently outgoing Prime Minister Benjamin net and Yahoo, 14 00:00:56,360 --> 00:00:59,520 Speaker 1: We've got Kevin Walling joining us. He's a democratic strategist 15 00:00:59,600 --> 00:01:02,840 Speaker 1: at Each G Creative Media, and of course, old reliable 16 00:01:02,920 --> 00:01:06,440 Speaker 1: Rick Davis, Bloomberg Politics contributor is with us for us 17 00:01:06,480 --> 00:01:10,360 Speaker 1: talking about everything happening in Israel, the latest on infrastructure 18 00:01:10,440 --> 00:01:13,319 Speaker 1: and tax negotiations, a whole lot to talk about actually 19 00:01:13,360 --> 00:01:17,119 Speaker 1: on foreign policy and President Biden's plan to block investments 20 00:01:17,120 --> 00:01:20,759 Speaker 1: in fifty nine companies with ties to the Chinese military. 21 00:01:20,920 --> 00:01:23,959 Speaker 1: But before we dive head first into everything I just listed, 22 00:01:24,120 --> 00:01:26,959 Speaker 1: let's get a market update from Charlie. Thank you very much. 23 00:01:27,040 --> 00:01:29,240 Speaker 1: Jack is back and here's what's going on. Lots of 24 00:01:29,280 --> 00:01:32,120 Speaker 1: earnings after the valve. Broadcom, one of the world's largest 25 00:01:32,160 --> 00:01:35,400 Speaker 1: chip makers, out with a polish forecast for quarterly sales, 26 00:01:35,720 --> 00:01:39,240 Speaker 1: signaling that corporations have returned to spending on their computer 27 00:01:39,360 --> 00:01:42,280 Speaker 1: networks as they open up offices up now by two 28 00:01:42,280 --> 00:01:45,520 Speaker 1: tenths of one percent After ours, Blululum and Athletic a 29 00:01:45,600 --> 00:01:48,680 Speaker 1: posting first quarter sales and an outlook for the full year, 30 00:01:48,960 --> 00:01:52,400 Speaker 1: but beat expectations as the company saw pickup in brick 31 00:01:52,440 --> 00:01:56,680 Speaker 1: and water traffic along with strong online sales. CrowdStrike boosted 32 00:01:56,720 --> 00:01:59,760 Speaker 1: it's adjusted earnings per share forecast for the full year, 33 00:02:00,040 --> 00:02:03,000 Speaker 1: the guidance beating the average ENLIS estimate shares a one 34 00:02:03,080 --> 00:02:06,480 Speaker 1: point four percent. Wall Streets focus very much on jobs. 35 00:02:06,480 --> 00:02:09,320 Speaker 1: We get the jobs report eight thirty am. Wall Street Time. 36 00:02:09,320 --> 00:02:12,720 Speaker 1: Complete coverage right here on Bloomberg Radio. Ahead of that report. 37 00:02:12,840 --> 00:02:17,120 Speaker 1: Down Thursday, equities fellows investors digested a raft of economic 38 00:02:17,200 --> 00:02:20,080 Speaker 1: data and a report President Biden may be open to 39 00:02:20,200 --> 00:02:25,480 Speaker 1: a lower corporate tax rate than SMP down fifteen drop 40 00:02:25,480 --> 00:02:28,160 Speaker 1: of four tenths of one percent to down down twenty three, 41 00:02:28,160 --> 00:02:30,480 Speaker 1: a drop of one tenth of one percent, and has 42 00:02:30,520 --> 00:02:33,440 Speaker 1: stacked down one forty want to drop there of one percent? 43 00:02:33,720 --> 00:02:37,680 Speaker 1: Tenure yield one point six two percent. I'm Charlie Pellett, 44 00:02:37,720 --> 00:02:41,320 Speaker 1: that old, reliable, and Jack is a Bloomberg Business flash. 45 00:02:41,880 --> 00:02:45,320 Speaker 1: All right, thank you, Charlie. I'm Jack Fitzpatrick here with 46 00:02:45,400 --> 00:02:50,480 Speaker 1: Bloomberg Politics contributor Rick Davis, so insightful as he often is, Rick, 47 00:02:50,560 --> 00:02:53,480 Speaker 1: I was excited to talk to you about everything happening 48 00:02:53,480 --> 00:02:56,320 Speaker 1: in Israel because of your knowledge on foreign policy issues, 49 00:02:56,320 --> 00:02:58,000 Speaker 1: even before I knew that we were going to get 50 00:02:58,000 --> 00:03:00,320 Speaker 1: a call today and just a little bit from a 51 00:03:00,360 --> 00:03:03,919 Speaker 1: former ambassador to Israel and actually a former ambassador to Egypt, 52 00:03:04,120 --> 00:03:07,639 Speaker 1: Daniel Kurtzer. While we wait for him, Rick, let's run 53 00:03:07,680 --> 00:03:10,679 Speaker 1: through the basics of what we know. Benjamin neton Yah, 54 00:03:10,680 --> 00:03:14,200 Speaker 1: who would be ousted as the Prime Minister of Israel 55 00:03:14,560 --> 00:03:18,960 Speaker 1: under a deal struck by opposition leader mostly led by 56 00:03:18,960 --> 00:03:23,400 Speaker 1: opposition leader Yayer Lapide, with a variety of other parties, 57 00:03:23,440 --> 00:03:26,560 Speaker 1: and I should emphasize a real variety of other parties 58 00:03:26,600 --> 00:03:31,480 Speaker 1: because under this deal, assuming this gets a successful vote 59 00:03:32,000 --> 00:03:35,920 Speaker 1: by the Knesset later on, the prime minister next prime 60 00:03:35,960 --> 00:03:39,680 Speaker 1: Minister would be Naftali Bennett, who actually, by a lot 61 00:03:39,720 --> 00:03:42,760 Speaker 1: of measures, appears to be more of a a nationalist, 62 00:03:42,800 --> 00:03:46,480 Speaker 1: more of a farther right UH member than net and 63 00:03:46,560 --> 00:03:50,720 Speaker 1: Yahoo himself is a person who opposes Palestinian statehood UH. 64 00:03:50,760 --> 00:03:54,040 Speaker 1: He has pushed for an annexation of portions of the 65 00:03:54,080 --> 00:03:58,520 Speaker 1: West Bank. Now I believe we have Daniel Kurtzer joining us. Daniel, 66 00:03:58,520 --> 00:04:00,680 Speaker 1: thank you so much for for come onto the show. 67 00:04:00,920 --> 00:04:03,600 Speaker 1: Really wanted somebody who could get into the details here. 68 00:04:03,760 --> 00:04:06,360 Speaker 1: Although I got to admit my first question on this 69 00:04:06,440 --> 00:04:10,960 Speaker 1: is a bit simple. This whole process of a new majority, 70 00:04:11,040 --> 00:04:14,160 Speaker 1: a new prime minister, This is subject to a vote, 71 00:04:14,360 --> 00:04:17,520 Speaker 1: and it sounds like they've got a very slim majority 72 00:04:17,680 --> 00:04:21,039 Speaker 1: in support of this. So just spell this out for me. 73 00:04:21,120 --> 00:04:23,680 Speaker 1: Is this actually going to happen? Is this a glide 74 00:04:23,680 --> 00:04:27,400 Speaker 1: path to having having a new prime minister? Is there 75 00:04:27,440 --> 00:04:30,720 Speaker 1: any risk of this falling apart at this point? Well, 76 00:04:30,760 --> 00:04:35,440 Speaker 1: the good news is that there are signed coalition agreements 77 00:04:35,480 --> 00:04:40,200 Speaker 1: among these eight parties, which if the Cannet that the 78 00:04:40,240 --> 00:04:46,200 Speaker 1: Israeli Parliament endorses this set of agreement, would represent a 79 00:04:46,240 --> 00:04:51,159 Speaker 1: new government. The questionable news is that the connected vote 80 00:04:51,680 --> 00:04:54,760 Speaker 1: might not take place for another eleven or twelve days, 81 00:04:55,600 --> 00:04:59,680 Speaker 1: during which time the current Prime Minister, Benjamin antan Yahoo 82 00:05:00,200 --> 00:05:04,040 Speaker 1: will pull out all stops from his playbook to try 83 00:05:04,080 --> 00:05:08,680 Speaker 1: to tear individuals away from especially the right wing parties 84 00:05:09,160 --> 00:05:13,839 Speaker 1: in this potential coalition and thereby deny them the majority 85 00:05:13,880 --> 00:05:19,320 Speaker 1: in the kinnessence. So it's certainly not over yet, But Nintanille, 86 00:05:19,360 --> 00:05:22,320 Speaker 1: who should be more worried today than any time in 87 00:05:22,320 --> 00:05:27,240 Speaker 1: the past twelve years. Sure, Now, from a US perspective, 88 00:05:27,560 --> 00:05:32,280 Speaker 1: how do you anticipate the Biden administration approaches this especially? 89 00:05:32,720 --> 00:05:35,640 Speaker 1: You know, they've been in a clearly a challenging position 90 00:05:35,680 --> 00:05:39,919 Speaker 1: with everything that's happened with Israel and Palestine previously. But 91 00:05:40,240 --> 00:05:45,240 Speaker 1: knowing that the Prime Minister is I guess likely to 92 00:05:45,320 --> 00:05:49,080 Speaker 1: be ousted and replaced, but I guess a a strong 93 00:05:49,279 --> 00:05:52,720 Speaker 1: opposition figure, there seems to be a lot of uncertainty. 94 00:05:52,760 --> 00:05:56,000 Speaker 1: How would you imagine the Biden administration approaches everything happening 95 00:05:56,000 --> 00:06:00,880 Speaker 1: in Israel? Well, they won't articulated this way, but there's 96 00:06:00,920 --> 00:06:03,720 Speaker 1: going to be a real sigh of relief should this 97 00:06:03,880 --> 00:06:08,040 Speaker 1: coalition in fact become the government. Remember that President Biden 98 00:06:08,120 --> 00:06:12,279 Speaker 1: spent eight years as Vice president during the Obama administration 99 00:06:12,480 --> 00:06:16,359 Speaker 1: when there was nothing but tension between President Obama and 100 00:06:16,360 --> 00:06:20,919 Speaker 1: Prime Minister Natanya who uh personal tension, political tension with 101 00:06:21,040 --> 00:06:25,960 Speaker 1: Nintanya who courting the Republicans over the Democrats working behind 102 00:06:26,040 --> 00:06:30,360 Speaker 1: the President's back. So in one respect, this will be 103 00:06:30,400 --> 00:06:35,520 Speaker 1: an easier coalition to deal with because the Israeli parties 104 00:06:35,960 --> 00:06:37,640 Speaker 1: are going to go out of their way to try 105 00:06:37,680 --> 00:06:40,920 Speaker 1: to tell the Democrats that we love you too, not 106 00:06:41,040 --> 00:06:43,760 Speaker 1: just the Republicans. On the other hand, on the two 107 00:06:43,800 --> 00:06:48,719 Speaker 1: issues where there are substantive differences, Iran and the occupied territories, 108 00:06:49,200 --> 00:06:53,160 Speaker 1: there will still be challenges ahead, but probably a little 109 00:06:53,200 --> 00:06:58,640 Speaker 1: bit easier for the administration to handle. Sure, Now, could 110 00:06:58,640 --> 00:07:00,760 Speaker 1: you tell us, ambassador about a little bit of the 111 00:07:00,880 --> 00:07:05,839 Speaker 1: history between the US and the relevant players here, because 112 00:07:05,880 --> 00:07:09,240 Speaker 1: I believe Secretary of State Anthony B. Lincoln, in his 113 00:07:09,400 --> 00:07:13,720 Speaker 1: recent trip to the Middle East met with yaher Lapide 114 00:07:14,120 --> 00:07:17,560 Speaker 1: but not uh enof Tally Bennett. How much of a 115 00:07:17,600 --> 00:07:21,119 Speaker 1: personal relationship is there, whether from the Secretary of State 116 00:07:21,200 --> 00:07:24,400 Speaker 1: or the President, or anyone in the high up in 117 00:07:24,400 --> 00:07:30,520 Speaker 1: the U. S Government with the new principal players in Israel. Well, B. 118 00:07:30,520 --> 00:07:34,240 Speaker 1: Lincoln is here to protocol. After all, Lapide had been 119 00:07:34,280 --> 00:07:37,520 Speaker 1: given a mandate by the President of Israel to try 120 00:07:37,560 --> 00:07:41,600 Speaker 1: to form a coalition, and therefore it was acceptable for B. 121 00:07:41,640 --> 00:07:44,320 Speaker 1: Lincoln to meet with him. But I'm not aware that 122 00:07:44,400 --> 00:07:49,680 Speaker 1: there are pre existing relationships between senior administration officials and 123 00:07:49,720 --> 00:07:54,720 Speaker 1: almost anyone else in this UH coalition that's emerging, except 124 00:07:55,440 --> 00:07:58,960 Speaker 1: for the Defense Minister Benny Gainst, who was the current 125 00:07:59,000 --> 00:08:02,520 Speaker 1: Defense Minister and has been in that role for the 126 00:08:02,560 --> 00:08:08,320 Speaker 1: past almost three years, and our defense establishment. We probably 127 00:08:08,360 --> 00:08:11,640 Speaker 1: don't know Bennett all that well. UH. We certainly don't 128 00:08:11,640 --> 00:08:15,240 Speaker 1: know some of the leaders of the smaller parties, including 129 00:08:15,760 --> 00:08:19,000 Speaker 1: the first time that an Israeli Our party has entered 130 00:08:19,000 --> 00:08:21,320 Speaker 1: the coalition. So there's going to be a lot of 131 00:08:21,520 --> 00:08:25,200 Speaker 1: introductions necessary. Ambassadors, wondering if I could follow up on 132 00:08:25,200 --> 00:08:28,400 Speaker 1: a point you were making just a minute ago about Iran. UH, 133 00:08:28,480 --> 00:08:31,760 Speaker 1: does this give if this government sticks, and of course 134 00:08:31,800 --> 00:08:33,760 Speaker 1: you you point out that we have twelve days of 135 00:08:33,840 --> 00:08:37,520 Speaker 1: uncertainty there. But if it does stick, Um, doesn't the 136 00:08:37,640 --> 00:08:41,240 Speaker 1: dynamic here give the Biden administration and opening to try 137 00:08:41,280 --> 00:08:45,080 Speaker 1: and work their will on a new Iran deal, where 138 00:08:45,120 --> 00:08:48,480 Speaker 1: before Prime Minister Nitt Yahoo was a real obstruction to that. 139 00:08:50,000 --> 00:08:52,679 Speaker 1: You know, I think that's true, except with the fact 140 00:08:52,720 --> 00:08:56,479 Speaker 1: that Iran is on the eve of its own elections 141 00:08:56,640 --> 00:08:59,720 Speaker 1: in the next couple of weeks and the position of 142 00:08:59,760 --> 00:09:04,760 Speaker 1: the Anians in the negotiations in Vienna has hardened rather considerably. 143 00:09:05,440 --> 00:09:08,040 Speaker 1: So on the one hand, one would think that this 144 00:09:08,080 --> 00:09:11,480 Speaker 1: would be a more propitious time for the administration to 145 00:09:12,160 --> 00:09:15,920 Speaker 1: cut the deal, to go back into the nuclear chord uh, 146 00:09:15,960 --> 00:09:19,960 Speaker 1: and to try to deal then with the aftermath of 147 00:09:20,000 --> 00:09:23,040 Speaker 1: that with the Israeli government. But we might not get 148 00:09:23,080 --> 00:09:26,800 Speaker 1: to that nuclear chord because of the internal Iranian politics, 149 00:09:27,240 --> 00:09:31,600 Speaker 1: which means this could drag on for some time. Ambassador, 150 00:09:31,640 --> 00:09:36,480 Speaker 1: I want to double back on your characterization of the 151 00:09:36,600 --> 00:09:40,920 Speaker 1: US probably breathing a sigh of relief here. Is there 152 00:09:40,960 --> 00:09:45,120 Speaker 1: a reason could you explain why does the presence of 153 00:09:45,360 --> 00:09:50,720 Speaker 1: Naftali Bennett as apparently the next prime minister for two 154 00:09:50,800 --> 00:09:56,959 Speaker 1: years before Yare Lapide would take over. Uh, my understanding, 155 00:09:57,040 --> 00:09:59,600 Speaker 1: and I'm a layman compared to you, obviously on this 156 00:09:59,640 --> 00:10:02,360 Speaker 1: My under standing is he's he's not too much of 157 00:10:02,360 --> 00:10:06,320 Speaker 1: a moderate or how would you characterize the stances of 158 00:10:06,480 --> 00:10:10,640 Speaker 1: Bennett and and why why is he not going to 159 00:10:10,720 --> 00:10:12,760 Speaker 1: make things more difficult for the US for the next 160 00:10:12,800 --> 00:10:16,760 Speaker 1: two years in your opinion, Well, Bennett personally and the 161 00:10:16,760 --> 00:10:20,600 Speaker 1: members of his party are actually further to the right, 162 00:10:20,760 --> 00:10:24,559 Speaker 1: if we could call it that. Then Prime Minister Netanyahu 163 00:10:25,360 --> 00:10:29,720 Speaker 1: uh no interest in the two state solution. UH. Bennett 164 00:10:29,760 --> 00:10:34,040 Speaker 1: has advocated for Palestinian autonomy, meaning they wouldn't get an 165 00:10:34,080 --> 00:10:38,840 Speaker 1: independent state. So if Bennett were an independent actor here, 166 00:10:39,760 --> 00:10:42,800 Speaker 1: it would be a tougher moment for the administration. But 167 00:10:42,960 --> 00:10:46,440 Speaker 1: this is a wall to wall coalition that includes UH 168 00:10:46,840 --> 00:10:51,440 Speaker 1: three parties way to the left of Bennett, the Arid 169 00:10:51,520 --> 00:10:56,880 Speaker 1: Party were on, the Merits Party, which is a socialist 170 00:10:56,960 --> 00:11:00,360 Speaker 1: party of sorts, and the Israeli Labor Party, as well 171 00:11:00,400 --> 00:11:03,360 Speaker 1: as two other parties that are to his left, although 172 00:11:03,480 --> 00:11:07,239 Speaker 1: more centrists, meaning the Blue and White Party and Lapete's 173 00:11:07,320 --> 00:11:13,920 Speaker 1: own UH party. So you have this this UH strange 174 00:11:13,960 --> 00:11:20,199 Speaker 1: combination of parties with very different viewpoints that are going 175 00:11:20,240 --> 00:11:24,160 Speaker 1: to constrain then its independence of action just in order 176 00:11:24,160 --> 00:11:27,920 Speaker 1: to keep the coalition together and for that reason alone, 177 00:11:28,000 --> 00:11:30,400 Speaker 1: there may be some hope that it will be a 178 00:11:30,440 --> 00:11:35,679 Speaker 1: moderating impact on than its own tendencies. Ambassa, It's nice 179 00:11:35,679 --> 00:11:38,319 Speaker 1: to see that there's another country that has more complexity 180 00:11:38,320 --> 00:11:41,480 Speaker 1: around their domestic political situation than maybe the US does 181 00:11:41,600 --> 00:11:44,120 Speaker 1: these days. I wanted to ask you about how this 182 00:11:44,240 --> 00:11:47,400 Speaker 1: might impact the region. We saw in the recent years 183 00:11:48,160 --> 00:11:51,240 Speaker 1: a lot of peace initiatives, the Abraham Act chords signed 184 00:11:51,480 --> 00:11:55,760 Speaker 1: throughout the region with Israel um primission. Ninyat made it 185 00:11:55,920 --> 00:11:59,520 Speaker 1: his signature initiative to open up relations with a lot 186 00:11:59,600 --> 00:12:04,280 Speaker 1: of the goal Uh countries UM. And then came the 187 00:12:04,440 --> 00:12:08,400 Speaker 1: fight between them and Hamas UH and and now the elections. 188 00:12:08,720 --> 00:12:13,479 Speaker 1: Does this have a salutary effect on those new relationships 189 00:12:13,480 --> 00:12:15,960 Speaker 1: in the region or do you see them actually being 190 00:12:16,040 --> 00:12:19,120 Speaker 1: part of the infrastructure now that can help hold all 191 00:12:19,160 --> 00:12:23,520 Speaker 1: these things together. Well, I think the relationships with the 192 00:12:23,520 --> 00:12:28,800 Speaker 1: Arab states are pretty solid, and they relate to Israel 193 00:12:28,920 --> 00:12:33,240 Speaker 1: not so much suits and personally. Uh. These were four 194 00:12:33,280 --> 00:12:35,360 Speaker 1: countries that we're looking for a little bit of an 195 00:12:35,360 --> 00:12:41,120 Speaker 1: anchor against the Iranian aggressive activities in the region. They 196 00:12:41,120 --> 00:12:46,240 Speaker 1: wanted access to Israeli high tech and other benefits, intelligence 197 00:12:46,280 --> 00:12:48,720 Speaker 1: and so forth. That they could get from Israel. So 198 00:12:48,760 --> 00:12:51,360 Speaker 1: I don't think the change of government for Arab states 199 00:12:51,520 --> 00:12:54,960 Speaker 1: is going to make much of a difference. Uh And frankly, 200 00:12:55,440 --> 00:12:57,800 Speaker 1: and unfortunately, I don't think it's going to make much 201 00:12:57,800 --> 00:13:01,679 Speaker 1: of a difference with Palestinians, where this recent war has 202 00:13:01,720 --> 00:13:04,439 Speaker 1: taken struct a toll that they're going to be very 203 00:13:04,440 --> 00:13:08,439 Speaker 1: skeptical of any Israeli government, including this one. Ambassador, thank 204 00:13:08,480 --> 00:13:11,840 Speaker 1: you so much for joining us. That was Ambassador Daniel Kurtzert. 205 00:13:11,920 --> 00:13:16,440 Speaker 1: I am Jack Fitzpatrick here with Bloomberg Politics contributor Rick Davis. 206 00:13:16,480 --> 00:13:19,600 Speaker 1: We're going to be joined by Kevin Walling, democratic strategist 207 00:13:19,640 --> 00:13:23,120 Speaker 1: at h G Creative Media, talking about everything in foreign 208 00:13:23,160 --> 00:13:28,559 Speaker 1: policy and infrastructure negotiations. Speaking of infrastructure and tax negotiations. 209 00:13:28,640 --> 00:13:33,920 Speaker 1: Earlier today, my colleague David Weston interviewed House Majority Whip 210 00:13:34,440 --> 00:13:37,640 Speaker 1: Jim Clyburn and they talked about the need for an 211 00:13:37,679 --> 00:13:40,480 Speaker 1: infrastructure deal and whether Democrats are going to need to 212 00:13:40,520 --> 00:13:43,320 Speaker 1: go it alone. Let's play the sound on that. From 213 00:13:43,360 --> 00:13:45,360 Speaker 1: your point of view, how are we doing on getting 214 00:13:45,360 --> 00:13:49,040 Speaker 1: this infrastructure bill done? Well, we are all still negotiating. 215 00:13:49,200 --> 00:13:53,120 Speaker 1: And I don't blame Biden for attention to do that. 216 00:13:53,960 --> 00:13:56,920 Speaker 1: I don't not know whether or not he's making much progress, 217 00:13:57,640 --> 00:13:59,880 Speaker 1: but you ought to make the f He promised you 218 00:13:59,880 --> 00:14:02,640 Speaker 1: American people that he would do what he could to 219 00:14:02,640 --> 00:14:05,760 Speaker 1: reach across the aisle, to try to do thinking a 220 00:14:05,880 --> 00:14:09,960 Speaker 1: bipartisans way. So he must give it his best definite 221 00:14:10,480 --> 00:14:13,240 Speaker 1: And now I think the American people can see if 222 00:14:13,280 --> 00:14:17,480 Speaker 1: the other side is being a bit uh, let's just 223 00:14:17,520 --> 00:14:21,640 Speaker 1: sit reticent in doing so. Most people who talked to 224 00:14:21,720 --> 00:14:23,920 Speaker 1: us say that time sort of a wasting So there 225 00:14:23,960 --> 00:14:25,960 Speaker 1: will come a time perhaps when they have to either 226 00:14:26,000 --> 00:14:28,600 Speaker 1: fish or cut bait. When is that time when the 227 00:14:28,600 --> 00:14:30,680 Speaker 1: President may have to decide whether to go it without 228 00:14:31,000 --> 00:14:33,160 Speaker 1: the Republicans or to go or to stick with it 229 00:14:33,160 --> 00:14:35,960 Speaker 1: biparterisan approach. Well, I won't say we're wasting time. I 230 00:14:36,040 --> 00:14:38,520 Speaker 1: might say be running out of time, but I don't 231 00:14:38,560 --> 00:14:41,680 Speaker 1: think it's ever a waste of time to try to communicate. 232 00:14:42,080 --> 00:14:45,080 Speaker 1: I believe very strongly that we all to keep the 233 00:14:45,160 --> 00:14:49,600 Speaker 1: lines of communist ucastion open, but I don't think we 234 00:14:49,680 --> 00:14:54,360 Speaker 1: should uh run the risk of not getting something done 235 00:14:54,760 --> 00:14:58,520 Speaker 1: because the other side is not cooperated. Right now, they 236 00:14:58,520 --> 00:15:01,920 Speaker 1: are not cooperating. But Joe Biden knows that very well. 237 00:15:02,480 --> 00:15:05,000 Speaker 1: He was there in two thousand and nine as vice 238 00:15:05,040 --> 00:15:08,680 Speaker 1: president when they did this song and dance Pitt Barack 239 00:15:08,720 --> 00:15:12,040 Speaker 1: Obama and refused to give the man the kind of 240 00:15:12,120 --> 00:15:16,600 Speaker 1: support that he was deserving of, and Joe Biden suffered 241 00:15:17,200 --> 00:15:19,760 Speaker 1: along with the rest of the people in the country. 242 00:15:20,120 --> 00:15:23,640 Speaker 1: He is not going to allow that to happen again. 243 00:15:24,000 --> 00:15:26,960 Speaker 1: There has been a July for deadline, talked about it. 244 00:15:27,000 --> 00:15:29,240 Speaker 1: When I get something done? Is that still operative? To 245 00:15:29,320 --> 00:15:33,760 Speaker 1: use the word that is frequently used in Washington, well, 246 00:15:33,880 --> 00:15:37,680 Speaker 1: I know, I hate to put dates on things. I 247 00:15:37,720 --> 00:15:40,480 Speaker 1: think that, Uh, they've got people up there. They don't 248 00:15:40,480 --> 00:15:43,200 Speaker 1: know their timetable much better than I do. They know 249 00:15:43,240 --> 00:15:45,800 Speaker 1: what they're planning to do, they know when they've got 250 00:15:45,800 --> 00:15:48,160 Speaker 1: to do it. We're gonna leave for the so called 251 00:15:48,200 --> 00:15:53,080 Speaker 1: August break at the end of July, and so I 252 00:15:53,160 --> 00:15:57,440 Speaker 1: suspect that the President would like to have something on 253 00:15:57,600 --> 00:16:01,440 Speaker 1: his desk before he goes out and off. We're talking 254 00:16:01,440 --> 00:16:04,160 Speaker 1: about spending more money, federal government money. Let's talk about 255 00:16:04,160 --> 00:16:06,080 Speaker 1: how we spent the last under the Cares Act. Because 256 00:16:06,120 --> 00:16:08,560 Speaker 1: I know that you are particularly involved an investigation of 257 00:16:08,600 --> 00:16:11,360 Speaker 1: the Southern Corporation in which there are some del balance 258 00:16:11,440 --> 00:16:13,240 Speaker 1: now you sent some letters to Department of Defense and 259 00:16:13,400 --> 00:16:16,760 Speaker 1: Department Treasury tell us about that. Well, Uh, this so 260 00:16:16,880 --> 00:16:23,440 Speaker 1: called Yellow Corporation has a very spotty record. Uh. They 261 00:16:23,480 --> 00:16:28,400 Speaker 1: received a seven hundred million dollar loan. UH, and it's 262 00:16:28,600 --> 00:16:32,280 Speaker 1: very questionable as well not they were they're serving of 263 00:16:32,360 --> 00:16:40,560 Speaker 1: that loan. Even UH Secretary Manugin himself uh said that 264 00:16:40,680 --> 00:16:46,200 Speaker 1: loan had problems, but they gave it to them anyway. 265 00:16:46,360 --> 00:16:50,160 Speaker 1: And we are looking to see whether or not fraud 266 00:16:50,280 --> 00:16:55,560 Speaker 1: and abuse took place here because not just because of us. Uh. 267 00:16:55,600 --> 00:16:59,720 Speaker 1: If you look at the history the Justice Department of Justice, 268 00:17:00,200 --> 00:17:03,800 Speaker 1: they've been suing them uh for overcharging the Department of 269 00:17:03,800 --> 00:17:07,680 Speaker 1: Defense over a period of seven years. And so if 270 00:17:07,720 --> 00:17:10,639 Speaker 1: you look out a comfortive with that record, uh, and 271 00:17:10,760 --> 00:17:13,879 Speaker 1: you look at the application and you look see something 272 00:17:14,240 --> 00:17:17,520 Speaker 1: a bit dubious, and you do it anyway, then it 273 00:17:17,600 --> 00:17:22,000 Speaker 1: says to me that your part and possil of the problem. 274 00:17:22,520 --> 00:17:26,560 Speaker 1: So the previous administration did not do a good job 275 00:17:27,160 --> 00:17:31,320 Speaker 1: of vetting people making sure that the Cares Act money 276 00:17:31,960 --> 00:17:37,800 Speaker 1: was spent properly. And my select subcommittee has the responsibility 277 00:17:38,640 --> 00:17:41,600 Speaker 1: of looking into all of these matters and making some 278 00:17:41,720 --> 00:17:45,480 Speaker 1: determination as to whether or not there's fraud and abuse 279 00:17:45,800 --> 00:17:50,000 Speaker 1: taking place, and as I always say, we are trying 280 00:17:50,040 --> 00:17:53,880 Speaker 1: to make sure that this money is spent efficiently, effectively, 281 00:17:54,400 --> 00:17:58,480 Speaker 1: and equitably. And I put fairness in that as well. 282 00:17:59,119 --> 00:18:01,960 Speaker 1: So Congress money, if in fact your investigation turns out 283 00:18:02,119 --> 00:18:05,960 Speaker 1: that it was not given appropriately, there were perhaps misreption 284 00:18:06,000 --> 00:18:08,320 Speaker 1: centations made, is there any hope of recouping the seven 285 00:18:08,400 --> 00:18:11,440 Speaker 1: hundred million dollars. Well, I'll leave it up to those 286 00:18:11,480 --> 00:18:15,639 Speaker 1: people who are responsible for doing that. Our responsibility is 287 00:18:15,680 --> 00:18:18,720 Speaker 1: to find the facts. When we get the facts, we 288 00:18:18,760 --> 00:18:23,600 Speaker 1: will submit them to the proper authoritists. Uh, and we'll 289 00:18:23,640 --> 00:18:27,040 Speaker 1: see what happens. Uh. So I'm not gonna get ahead 290 00:18:27,600 --> 00:18:30,960 Speaker 1: of myself on this. I'm gonna just continue to do 291 00:18:31,840 --> 00:18:34,639 Speaker 1: what we authorized to do, and then we'll see what 292 00:18:34,720 --> 00:18:39,639 Speaker 1: the other agencies that have a different portfolio do with 293 00:18:39,680 --> 00:18:42,159 Speaker 1: the information content. Are there any other companies that are 294 00:18:42,200 --> 00:18:47,760 Speaker 1: like the Southern Corporation at this point? Yes, there are companies. 295 00:18:48,680 --> 00:18:51,920 Speaker 1: I will make it an announcements about them today, But 296 00:18:52,080 --> 00:18:55,399 Speaker 1: this is not the only one by a lun shot, 297 00:18:57,160 --> 00:19:00,480 Speaker 1: all right. That was Bloomberg's David Weston within an exclusive 298 00:19:00,520 --> 00:19:03,560 Speaker 1: interview this morning with House Majority with James Clyburne with 299 00:19:03,600 --> 00:19:07,359 Speaker 1: a little spin forward on maybe future investigations on where 300 00:19:07,440 --> 00:19:10,520 Speaker 1: all the COVID money has gone. I am Jack Fitzpatrick. 301 00:19:10,600 --> 00:19:14,000 Speaker 1: I'm here with Bloomberg Politics contributor Rick Davis, and joining 302 00:19:14,119 --> 00:19:16,920 Speaker 1: us on the line now is Kevin Walling. He's a 303 00:19:16,960 --> 00:19:20,479 Speaker 1: democratic strategist at h G Creative Media and also a 304 00:19:20,520 --> 00:19:25,199 Speaker 1: former Biden campaign surrogate. Now, Kevin. Earlier we heard from 305 00:19:25,520 --> 00:19:30,040 Speaker 1: Daniel Kurtzer, a former ambassador to Israel, who explained everything 306 00:19:30,080 --> 00:19:32,840 Speaker 1: we needed to know about Israel, and one thing that 307 00:19:32,960 --> 00:19:35,440 Speaker 1: stood out to me, and I'm curious where what your 308 00:19:35,480 --> 00:19:40,280 Speaker 1: expectations are on this is uh. The ambassador said, Look, 309 00:19:40,320 --> 00:19:43,040 Speaker 1: this is probably going to lead the US side, the 310 00:19:43,080 --> 00:19:47,120 Speaker 1: Biden administration to breathe a sigh of relief, even though Uh, 311 00:19:47,160 --> 00:19:50,560 Speaker 1: the next prime minister would be by many accounts more 312 00:19:50,760 --> 00:19:53,320 Speaker 1: conservative or more nationalists, however you want to put it, 313 00:19:53,560 --> 00:19:58,320 Speaker 1: then Prime Minister net and Yahoo, I'm I'm curious with 314 00:19:58,359 --> 00:20:02,560 Speaker 1: all that in mind, with the the uncertainty about how 315 00:20:02,600 --> 00:20:06,199 Speaker 1: the next few years look in Israel, what what is 316 00:20:06,280 --> 00:20:10,159 Speaker 1: your anticipation How do you anticipate the Biden administration would 317 00:20:10,200 --> 00:20:14,520 Speaker 1: approach everything there? Yeah, Jack, Rick, it's gonna be back 318 00:20:14,560 --> 00:20:16,720 Speaker 1: with you all. I really enjoyed the conversation with the 319 00:20:16,760 --> 00:20:19,680 Speaker 1: former investador. Uh. And you know, it's any question as 320 00:20:19,680 --> 00:20:21,960 Speaker 1: to what will actually take place, you know, I I 321 00:20:21,960 --> 00:20:25,159 Speaker 1: certainly wouldn't count bb net and Yahoo out. Uh. You know, 322 00:20:25,240 --> 00:20:28,560 Speaker 1: he's clinging on for dear life. You know, he vowed 323 00:20:28,600 --> 00:20:31,840 Speaker 1: today tonight to keep pushing against this agreement. But you know, 324 00:20:31,880 --> 00:20:35,000 Speaker 1: it's fascinating to me to see eight different political parties 325 00:20:35,119 --> 00:20:39,000 Speaker 1: with the far less the far right united in this coalition. 326 00:20:39,160 --> 00:20:41,480 Speaker 1: It's certainly going to be I think, you know, very 327 00:20:41,520 --> 00:20:44,480 Speaker 1: interesting dynamics with how the Biden administration will approach this 328 00:20:44,640 --> 00:20:47,640 Speaker 1: new kind of, for lack of a better word, unity government, uh, 329 00:20:47,680 --> 00:20:50,800 Speaker 1: in the coming days and weeks. Jen Psaki was asked 330 00:20:50,800 --> 00:20:52,719 Speaker 1: about that today from the podium, and she kind of 331 00:20:52,720 --> 00:20:55,879 Speaker 1: deferred and said, you know, we'll let the Israelis decide 332 00:20:55,920 --> 00:20:58,520 Speaker 1: for themselves in terms of the government going forward and 333 00:20:58,640 --> 00:21:01,280 Speaker 1: kind of a hands off approach. Uh. You know, obviously 334 00:21:01,440 --> 00:21:05,199 Speaker 1: the former guy Donald Trump would have likely expressed his 335 00:21:05,240 --> 00:21:08,120 Speaker 1: support very clearly. Uh. So it's kind of a change 336 00:21:08,160 --> 00:21:10,399 Speaker 1: in pace with the Biden administration taking kind of a 337 00:21:10,400 --> 00:21:14,600 Speaker 1: backwards look at what's going on in the state of Israel. Yeah, 338 00:21:14,640 --> 00:21:16,880 Speaker 1: you're making a good point. I think the Biden administration 339 00:21:16,960 --> 00:21:20,960 Speaker 1: clearly has to try to play it safe, not swing 340 00:21:21,000 --> 00:21:24,199 Speaker 1: wildly here. Now I'm curious, Rick, what you made of 341 00:21:24,240 --> 00:21:29,080 Speaker 1: this the anticipation that this, as Kevin said, very diverse 342 00:21:29,200 --> 00:21:34,560 Speaker 1: coalition left right and center, seemingly would have a moderating 343 00:21:34,640 --> 00:21:37,600 Speaker 1: effect on the person who is supposed to be the 344 00:21:37,640 --> 00:21:41,520 Speaker 1: next prime minister, not Tally Bennett, who does not really 345 00:21:41,520 --> 00:21:44,119 Speaker 1: want to see a two state solution. It sounds like, 346 00:21:44,440 --> 00:21:47,720 Speaker 1: do you buy the former ambassador's explanation that when you 347 00:21:47,760 --> 00:21:50,080 Speaker 1: have such a broad coalition that's going to be a 348 00:21:50,119 --> 00:21:52,119 Speaker 1: moderating effect on him or what? Rick, what are your 349 00:21:52,119 --> 00:21:55,280 Speaker 1: expectations for the person who appears to be in line 350 00:21:55,320 --> 00:21:57,719 Speaker 1: to be the next Prime minister of Israel? Yeah? This 351 00:21:57,800 --> 00:22:00,919 Speaker 1: is uh, what Kevin said is true. This is MAGA 352 00:22:01,000 --> 00:22:03,840 Speaker 1: meets AOC in the same coalition. How do you keep 353 00:22:03,920 --> 00:22:07,000 Speaker 1: that group together? I mean, that's more likely to start 354 00:22:07,040 --> 00:22:10,760 Speaker 1: a fight than with hamas Um So Benn, it's got Benn, 355 00:22:10,760 --> 00:22:13,280 Speaker 1: it's got a limited mandate, right, I mean he's got 356 00:22:13,280 --> 00:22:17,399 Speaker 1: to keep a coalition together that's incredibly diverse. Uh, and 357 00:22:17,440 --> 00:22:20,680 Speaker 1: he's going to do it in a free fire political 358 00:22:20,720 --> 00:22:25,400 Speaker 1: exercise by uh former prime minister. If they take over 359 00:22:25,560 --> 00:22:28,320 Speaker 1: the post b bing nitt Yahoo, He's not going to 360 00:22:28,440 --> 00:22:31,159 Speaker 1: leave this alone, and so the challenge is going to 361 00:22:31,240 --> 00:22:33,199 Speaker 1: be steep, and it will probably have to have a 362 00:22:33,280 --> 00:22:37,639 Speaker 1: moderating influence because Bennett is uh arguably more conservative than 363 00:22:37,680 --> 00:22:40,399 Speaker 1: being nint Yahoo, but he rules a coalition with people 364 00:22:40,400 --> 00:22:43,560 Speaker 1: who are diametrically opposed to many of those nintin Yahoo policies, 365 00:22:43,640 --> 00:22:46,879 Speaker 1: and so um, you know, maybe it's a moment in 366 00:22:46,880 --> 00:22:49,040 Speaker 1: time where people will put their country interests ahead of 367 00:22:49,040 --> 00:22:51,919 Speaker 1: their political interests. I think that's the notion around this 368 00:22:52,040 --> 00:22:55,320 Speaker 1: coalition is that we can't keep having elections. They've had, 369 00:22:55,440 --> 00:22:57,800 Speaker 1: you know, numerous elections over a short period of time 370 00:22:58,119 --> 00:23:02,119 Speaker 1: and it has not resulted in a positive domestic situation. 371 00:23:02,240 --> 00:23:05,080 Speaker 1: So um uh, we'll see how long this lasts. It 372 00:23:05,080 --> 00:23:07,520 Speaker 1: wouldn't surprise me that they're going to wind up in 373 00:23:07,600 --> 00:23:12,200 Speaker 1: elections again sometime soon. But in the meantime, it does 374 00:23:12,440 --> 00:23:14,840 Speaker 1: I think give a break to the Biden administration. This 375 00:23:14,960 --> 00:23:18,760 Speaker 1: was an unwelcome intrusion into their foreign policy strategy. They 376 00:23:18,800 --> 00:23:21,440 Speaker 1: didn't want to have to deal with a mini war 377 00:23:21,520 --> 00:23:24,160 Speaker 1: in the Middle East and so, uh, if this can 378 00:23:24,240 --> 00:23:26,919 Speaker 1: keep that from rearing up again, I think it'll be 379 00:23:26,960 --> 00:23:31,240 Speaker 1: considered positive in Washington. So let's broaden the scope scope 380 00:23:31,240 --> 00:23:34,760 Speaker 1: a little bit. On foreign policy, Rick, I'm I'm curious 381 00:23:34,800 --> 00:23:37,440 Speaker 1: what you're looking forward to in the next What is 382 00:23:37,480 --> 00:23:40,480 Speaker 1: it a week and a half from now? First? Were 383 00:23:40,600 --> 00:23:43,360 Speaker 1: we heard today that President Biden is going to meet 384 00:23:43,400 --> 00:23:48,760 Speaker 1: with Turkish President Air Towan on June during his Europe trip. 385 00:23:49,000 --> 00:23:51,520 Speaker 1: At the end of that, Biden is going to meet 386 00:23:51,520 --> 00:23:54,480 Speaker 1: with Vladimir Putin. That news broke earlier, but today it 387 00:23:54,560 --> 00:23:57,320 Speaker 1: came up that Biden does plan to raise this issue 388 00:23:57,720 --> 00:24:02,120 Speaker 1: of hackers that maybe op rating out of Russia. Recently 389 00:24:02,160 --> 00:24:04,960 Speaker 1: we we heard not only about the Colonial pipeline hack, 390 00:24:05,000 --> 00:24:09,000 Speaker 1: but the JBS meat processor hack. Uh. What is on 391 00:24:09,240 --> 00:24:14,560 Speaker 1: your radar? Rick? Obviously those are two big uh newsmakers. 392 00:24:14,560 --> 00:24:16,480 Speaker 1: How do how do you think this goes? I can't 393 00:24:16,480 --> 00:24:20,560 Speaker 1: imagine that that Europe trip on the whole keeps things 394 00:24:20,600 --> 00:24:23,480 Speaker 1: sort of quiet and uh and and predictable for the 395 00:24:23,480 --> 00:24:26,879 Speaker 1: Biden administration. What are you looking for holistically in the 396 00:24:26,880 --> 00:24:28,719 Speaker 1: next week and a half or so on foreign policy 397 00:24:28,760 --> 00:24:31,399 Speaker 1: for Biden? Yeah? I think in both those situations you 398 00:24:31,480 --> 00:24:35,240 Speaker 1: just mentioned, um, you know, with Urdawan in Turkey, and 399 00:24:35,240 --> 00:24:38,720 Speaker 1: and and and and Vladimir Putin, They're gonna have to 400 00:24:38,760 --> 00:24:41,399 Speaker 1: find where the boundaries are because the last thing I 401 00:24:41,440 --> 00:24:45,679 Speaker 1: think that this administration wants to do is returned to 402 00:24:45,760 --> 00:24:49,280 Speaker 1: some kind of cold war status with with the Russians 403 00:24:49,440 --> 00:24:53,280 Speaker 1: and potentially, um, you know, get into a situation where 404 00:24:53,280 --> 00:24:56,480 Speaker 1: they can't have a constructive dialogue in Turkey. Turkey is 405 00:24:56,480 --> 00:25:00,720 Speaker 1: a member of NATO. We've had enormous bad run with them, UH, 406 00:25:01,040 --> 00:25:06,480 Speaker 1: most notable and sort of UH exemplified by UH Urdawan's 407 00:25:06,600 --> 00:25:09,800 Speaker 1: last visit to Washington where one of his bodyguards assaulted 408 00:25:09,800 --> 00:25:12,760 Speaker 1: in a protester. I mean, it's just really bad karma 409 00:25:13,160 --> 00:25:15,960 Speaker 1: in the relationship with Turkey and and and and Yet 410 00:25:16,160 --> 00:25:19,000 Speaker 1: as a regional ally, it's really important and we find 411 00:25:19,000 --> 00:25:22,000 Speaker 1: a way to deal with those guys on on on 412 00:25:22,040 --> 00:25:26,240 Speaker 1: the hack UH, increased UH sanctions are on the table, 413 00:25:26,520 --> 00:25:28,880 Speaker 1: and and Biden's going to have to deliver a very 414 00:25:28,920 --> 00:25:33,320 Speaker 1: strong message to Putin that that this is now one 415 00:25:33,320 --> 00:25:35,480 Speaker 1: of the top issues, and he's going to have to 416 00:25:35,480 --> 00:25:38,760 Speaker 1: wrestle it as a domestic issue because it's it's really 417 00:25:39,280 --> 00:25:43,840 Speaker 1: affecting the functioning of our infrastructure, especially impacted by the 418 00:25:43,880 --> 00:25:48,680 Speaker 1: Colonial pipeline attacked by Dark Side, a Russian based hacking group. 419 00:25:48,760 --> 00:25:51,879 Speaker 1: So I think this is going to be a fascinating month. 420 00:25:52,400 --> 00:25:54,840 Speaker 1: Normally the summer is pretty quiet, but not this summer. 421 00:25:57,920 --> 00:26:04,080 Speaker 1: This is Bloomberg Owned on on Bloomberg Radio. I'm Jack Fitzpatrick. 422 00:26:04,320 --> 00:26:08,040 Speaker 1: It's a Thursday afternoon. I'm here with Rick Davis, Bloomberg 423 00:26:08,080 --> 00:26:12,680 Speaker 1: Politics contributor, and we've got Kevin Walling, democratic strategist at 424 00:26:12,880 --> 00:26:16,639 Speaker 1: h G Creative Media on with us. We've got to 425 00:26:16,680 --> 00:26:19,359 Speaker 1: talk about the person who seems to be the man 426 00:26:19,400 --> 00:26:21,639 Speaker 1: of the hour. Just about all the time, we've been 427 00:26:21,680 --> 00:26:26,720 Speaker 1: talking so much about the centrality of Senator Joe Mansion, uh, 428 00:26:26,880 --> 00:26:32,439 Speaker 1: Democrat of West Virginia on infrastructure, negotiations, on taxes. Have 429 00:26:32,520 --> 00:26:34,840 Speaker 1: you guys seen this? Uh this this became a little 430 00:26:34,840 --> 00:26:37,240 Speaker 1: bit of a Twitter thing. It's a picture of what 431 00:26:37,320 --> 00:26:40,160 Speaker 1: looks like a futuristic city with people flying around saying 432 00:26:40,160 --> 00:26:42,679 Speaker 1: this is going to be West Virginia when Democrats are 433 00:26:42,720 --> 00:26:45,959 Speaker 1: done with all their earmarks that Joe Mansion gets. Um. 434 00:26:46,400 --> 00:26:50,399 Speaker 1: Rick tell me about Joe Mansion not only though on 435 00:26:50,520 --> 00:26:52,800 Speaker 1: infrastructure and taxes, but I think he probably is going 436 00:26:52,840 --> 00:26:57,320 Speaker 1: to play a central role on almost anything else Democrats 437 00:26:57,359 --> 00:27:00,119 Speaker 1: want to do. On on voting rights, it's set or 438 00:27:00,200 --> 00:27:05,240 Speaker 1: uh what At what point does do Democrats just crown 439 00:27:05,440 --> 00:27:09,399 Speaker 1: Joe Mansion almost the leader and the decider, the arbiter 440 00:27:09,520 --> 00:27:11,879 Speaker 1: of what they're able to get done. Yeah. I recall 441 00:27:11,920 --> 00:27:15,280 Speaker 1: after the Georgia elections where we realized for the first 442 00:27:15,320 --> 00:27:18,280 Speaker 1: time we were going to have a fifty fifty Senate um, 443 00:27:18,480 --> 00:27:20,760 Speaker 1: everybody sort of pulled out their guide book and discovered 444 00:27:20,800 --> 00:27:24,000 Speaker 1: Joe mentioned as a center from West Virginia who really was, 445 00:27:24,160 --> 00:27:28,399 Speaker 1: you know, the most moderate uh slash conservative Democratic senator 446 00:27:28,480 --> 00:27:31,520 Speaker 1: and realized that he was going to be the fifty 447 00:27:31,560 --> 00:27:34,960 Speaker 1: first vote on almost every major issue. And now we 448 00:27:35,000 --> 00:27:39,240 Speaker 1: see it happening. We see his importance on the current debate. 449 00:27:39,640 --> 00:27:43,320 Speaker 1: Even his UH co star from West Virginia, shelleymore Capital, 450 00:27:43,440 --> 00:27:47,159 Speaker 1: is the lead negotiator for the Republicans and uh and 451 00:27:47,200 --> 00:27:50,480 Speaker 1: without Joe Mansion's acquiescence, the Democrats can't move forward on 452 00:27:50,520 --> 00:27:53,000 Speaker 1: a deal. And in the same on voting rights. I mean, 453 00:27:53,080 --> 00:27:56,560 Speaker 1: he's been a stickler on the Democrats very high priority 454 00:27:56,640 --> 00:27:59,000 Speaker 1: voting rights bill, a way to combat what's happening at 455 00:27:59,000 --> 00:28:01,920 Speaker 1: the state level. By the g O P. And they 456 00:28:01,920 --> 00:28:03,840 Speaker 1: can't get him to budge and they can't move that 457 00:28:03,920 --> 00:28:07,600 Speaker 1: bill without his support. With it, they get what they want. 458 00:28:08,080 --> 00:28:12,400 Speaker 1: So I think that that that he's been very circumspect on, 459 00:28:12,680 --> 00:28:14,480 Speaker 1: you know, saying what he would and wouldn't be for 460 00:28:14,840 --> 00:28:18,199 Speaker 1: until the deal is cut. But I can't imagine a 461 00:28:18,240 --> 00:28:22,360 Speaker 1: more important person in Washington right now than Senator Joe Mansion. Well, 462 00:28:22,440 --> 00:28:26,639 Speaker 1: and speaking of the the voting rights issue and how 463 00:28:26,680 --> 00:28:29,840 Speaker 1: everything could hinge on Mansion on voting rights, uh, in 464 00:28:29,880 --> 00:28:33,800 Speaker 1: addition to infrastructure, Kevin, I mean, voting rights doesn't seem 465 00:28:33,880 --> 00:28:37,080 Speaker 1: like something that Democrats can do on their own anyway. 466 00:28:37,080 --> 00:28:40,320 Speaker 1: Maybe there's frustration right now with Mansion saying we've got 467 00:28:40,320 --> 00:28:43,480 Speaker 1: to have bipartisan talks on infrastructure because there's the assumption 468 00:28:43,840 --> 00:28:46,440 Speaker 1: that Democrats could do a lot of that in a 469 00:28:46,520 --> 00:28:49,720 Speaker 1: partisan way with the budget process budget reconciliation. But I 470 00:28:49,720 --> 00:28:52,520 Speaker 1: don't think they could really do much on voting rights 471 00:28:52,760 --> 00:28:56,080 Speaker 1: without bipartisans support. So, I mean, Kevin, do you do 472 00:28:56,120 --> 00:29:00,240 Speaker 1: you see Mansion as the central figure on that kind 473 00:29:00,240 --> 00:29:03,000 Speaker 1: of thing as he has been on a fiscal issue 474 00:29:03,040 --> 00:29:07,320 Speaker 1: like infrastructure. Absolutely, Jack, And the Rick's point is a 475 00:29:07,360 --> 00:29:09,440 Speaker 1: good one. I mean talk about his state delegation hitting 476 00:29:09,440 --> 00:29:12,280 Speaker 1: above its weight between Joe mansion and chilling more capital 477 00:29:12,360 --> 00:29:14,959 Speaker 1: from from West Virginia and harkins back to when Probert 478 00:29:15,000 --> 00:29:17,480 Speaker 1: Herb was the majority leader in every new building built 479 00:29:17,520 --> 00:29:19,440 Speaker 1: in West Virginia was built by the said I think 480 00:29:19,480 --> 00:29:22,640 Speaker 1: for decades. Um. But you know, to to your point, 481 00:29:22,720 --> 00:29:25,000 Speaker 1: you know, it's a fifty fifties split obviously with budget 482 00:29:25,000 --> 00:29:28,800 Speaker 1: reconciliation on an infrastructure package if these talks uh collapse. 483 00:29:28,880 --> 00:29:31,640 Speaker 1: But you're absolutely right, you know, in terms of h 484 00:29:31,960 --> 00:29:34,720 Speaker 1: S one, HR one, the For the People Act that 485 00:29:35,400 --> 00:29:37,800 Speaker 1: addresses a lot of these concerns on the national level 486 00:29:37,960 --> 00:29:41,320 Speaker 1: level with voting right, that's got to be most likely 487 00:29:41,360 --> 00:29:46,520 Speaker 1: a bipartisan vote H for anything regarding those kinds of issues, 488 00:29:46,520 --> 00:29:49,440 Speaker 1: And that's what Joe mentioned has pushed for Kirsen Cinema. 489 00:29:50,040 --> 00:29:54,400 Speaker 1: His colleague from Arizona is supportive of HR one S one, 490 00:29:54,840 --> 00:29:57,920 Speaker 1: but not obviously blowing up the filibuster because of that truth. 491 00:29:57,920 --> 00:30:02,000 Speaker 1: Asked this week again about that and and climbed to, uh, 492 00:30:02,040 --> 00:30:04,720 Speaker 1: you know, talk about blowing up the filibuster. So these 493 00:30:04,800 --> 00:30:08,480 Speaker 1: kinds of non financial related issues to certainly have to 494 00:30:08,520 --> 00:30:11,360 Speaker 1: have some kind of bipartisan support to you know that 495 00:30:11,400 --> 00:30:14,320 Speaker 1: sixty vote market. Yeah. I had to raise this because 496 00:30:14,360 --> 00:30:17,320 Speaker 1: I really just want to know ultimately, how many school 497 00:30:17,400 --> 00:30:20,640 Speaker 1: gyms or parking facilities are going to be named the 498 00:30:21,080 --> 00:30:27,320 Speaker 1: Joseph Mansion the third uh gymnasium or or parking parking structure. 499 00:30:27,640 --> 00:30:31,080 Speaker 1: By the way, guys, I had to mention, as Charlie 500 00:30:31,120 --> 00:30:34,320 Speaker 1: Pellett did in the update earlier, Uh, the death of 501 00:30:34,480 --> 00:30:38,600 Speaker 1: f Lee Bailey, who is the defense attorney? Uh you 502 00:30:38,600 --> 00:30:41,200 Speaker 1: know the actually the headline on the Bloomberg terminal as 503 00:30:41,240 --> 00:30:45,360 Speaker 1: f Lee Bailey defender of the famous and notorious dies 504 00:30:46,000 --> 00:30:49,440 Speaker 1: at eighties seven. He had clients such as O. J. 505 00:30:49,600 --> 00:30:52,680 Speaker 1: Simpson had to had to touch on this, Rick, can 506 00:30:52,720 --> 00:30:56,400 Speaker 1: you some up how how is this? How is he 507 00:30:56,440 --> 00:30:59,440 Speaker 1: going to be remembered? I think probably a legacy dominated 508 00:30:59,480 --> 00:31:02,600 Speaker 1: by the Simin trial. But can you reflect on on 509 00:31:03,080 --> 00:31:06,960 Speaker 1: I mean, this seems like something that clearly was a 510 00:31:07,000 --> 00:31:09,920 Speaker 1: person who was sort of dominant in the zeitgeist to 511 00:31:10,040 --> 00:31:12,719 Speaker 1: some extent in in the nineties. What are your thoughts 512 00:31:13,160 --> 00:31:15,360 Speaker 1: of this news? Jack, You're so right, I mean I 513 00:31:15,400 --> 00:31:17,920 Speaker 1: grew up with ef Lee Bailey. I mean he was 514 00:31:18,480 --> 00:31:21,800 Speaker 1: an important public figure from the time I started watching 515 00:31:21,840 --> 00:31:25,440 Speaker 1: the evening news with my parents. Uh he he he 516 00:31:25,520 --> 00:31:29,560 Speaker 1: was notorious too. You described just perfectly because the first 517 00:31:29,600 --> 00:31:31,880 Speaker 1: instance that I recall of him, he was he was 518 00:31:32,680 --> 00:31:36,920 Speaker 1: representing the commander of a military unit that that did 519 00:31:37,000 --> 00:31:39,480 Speaker 1: something that has been settled to history called the Melee 520 00:31:39,640 --> 00:31:44,000 Speaker 1: massacre in Vietnam in night and and and American soldiers 521 00:31:44,040 --> 00:31:47,520 Speaker 1: killed five hundred villagers one day, and and the commander 522 00:31:47,560 --> 00:31:50,040 Speaker 1: was put for trial. And guess who his lawyer was, 523 00:31:50,160 --> 00:31:53,640 Speaker 1: ef Lee Bailey. Everybody deserved a good lawyer, and ef 524 00:31:53,720 --> 00:31:57,240 Speaker 1: Lee Bailey was was was taking a very unpopular stand 525 00:31:57,920 --> 00:32:01,760 Speaker 1: by representing this commander, and yet made enormous amount of 526 00:32:02,120 --> 00:32:05,480 Speaker 1: press and attention uh in that in that case, and 527 00:32:05,480 --> 00:32:07,400 Speaker 1: and it only went from there. I mean, you don't 528 00:32:07,400 --> 00:32:09,600 Speaker 1: have to look very far in history to see his 529 00:32:09,680 --> 00:32:13,360 Speaker 1: fingerprints on almost every one of the really high profile 530 00:32:14,040 --> 00:32:18,400 Speaker 1: legal cases, uh throughout that the next five decades. And 531 00:32:18,480 --> 00:32:21,120 Speaker 1: so his his loss is an end of an era. 532 00:32:21,720 --> 00:32:23,680 Speaker 1: Uh And and maybe a lot of people will say 533 00:32:23,680 --> 00:32:25,800 Speaker 1: that's one era that we just as soon forget about, 534 00:32:26,680 --> 00:32:30,360 Speaker 1: right right, they think the end of an era. It's 535 00:32:30,400 --> 00:32:33,200 Speaker 1: hard to sum up the legacy, but the the end 536 00:32:33,200 --> 00:32:37,360 Speaker 1: of an era whether you're you're got positive or negative feelings, 537 00:32:38,200 --> 00:32:40,280 Speaker 1: very significant. Had to raise that. By the way, I 538 00:32:40,680 --> 00:32:43,120 Speaker 1: want to touch on one other thing that came up today. 539 00:32:43,240 --> 00:32:47,960 Speaker 1: Earlier today, the President announced he is signing an order 540 00:32:48,160 --> 00:32:52,800 Speaker 1: blocking the investment in fifty nine companies tied to China's military. 541 00:32:52,840 --> 00:32:57,160 Speaker 1: This is a an amendment of a Trump move, but 542 00:32:57,240 --> 00:33:00,040 Speaker 1: actually an expansion of the number of of come and 543 00:33:00,160 --> 00:33:03,160 Speaker 1: he's blocked. They were relying on one report by d 544 00:33:03,280 --> 00:33:06,920 Speaker 1: O D. Now the Treasury will do another report. This affects, obviously, 545 00:33:06,960 --> 00:33:12,160 Speaker 1: I think unsurprisingly companies like Huawei, major telecom companies in China. 546 00:33:12,440 --> 00:33:16,160 Speaker 1: Kevin I, I I want to get your take on it. 547 00:33:16,280 --> 00:33:20,480 Speaker 1: Actually seems like Biden ended up being more of a 548 00:33:20,600 --> 00:33:23,880 Speaker 1: China hawk in this move than Trump was with the 549 00:33:23,880 --> 00:33:27,080 Speaker 1: initial move, where at least it's more companies affected. Is 550 00:33:27,160 --> 00:33:29,880 Speaker 1: that the result in your mind, is that the result 551 00:33:30,000 --> 00:33:33,280 Speaker 1: of some sort of political pressure on Biden. He seems 552 00:33:33,280 --> 00:33:36,040 Speaker 1: to face a lot of pressure not backing down on China. 553 00:33:36,240 --> 00:33:38,320 Speaker 1: What's the logic that you think went into this kind 554 00:33:38,320 --> 00:33:41,680 Speaker 1: of move. Yeah, it's a good question, Jack. Of course, 555 00:33:41,720 --> 00:33:45,760 Speaker 1: it builds on the the executive order by the previous 556 00:33:45,800 --> 00:33:49,680 Speaker 1: administration under Donald Trump. You know, China is actually something 557 00:33:49,720 --> 00:33:53,360 Speaker 1: that actually unites Republicans and Democrats. We're seeing you know, 558 00:33:53,400 --> 00:33:56,800 Speaker 1: Marco Rubio, Mark Kelly, Liz Cheney in a letter, you know, 559 00:33:56,800 --> 00:33:59,680 Speaker 1: pushing the administration to do more in terms of identifying 560 00:33:59,680 --> 00:34:01,960 Speaker 1: these these as part of this order. And it could 561 00:34:01,960 --> 00:34:05,400 Speaker 1: be a rare kind of strike of bipartisanship assigned from 562 00:34:05,440 --> 00:34:09,560 Speaker 1: these ongoing conversations on infrastructure with the China question, and 563 00:34:09,560 --> 00:34:13,480 Speaker 1: it's you know, not just in terms of military uh investments, 564 00:34:13,520 --> 00:34:16,520 Speaker 1: but obviously the president has raised the issue of human rights. 565 00:34:16,800 --> 00:34:18,759 Speaker 1: You know, you're seeing the administration you know, speak out 566 00:34:18,760 --> 00:34:20,520 Speaker 1: a bit more in terms of the origins of the 567 00:34:20,680 --> 00:34:22,719 Speaker 1: of COVID nineteen so against This is kind of an 568 00:34:22,760 --> 00:34:25,719 Speaker 1: interesting issue because again it's one of these rare kind 569 00:34:25,719 --> 00:34:27,759 Speaker 1: of bipartisan moments that we're seeing play out. It was 570 00:34:27,840 --> 00:34:31,480 Speaker 1: support of the administration. Yeah, Rick, were you surprised by that? 571 00:34:31,600 --> 00:34:35,160 Speaker 1: And you know, I'm curious. I know there there was 572 00:34:35,239 --> 00:34:39,200 Speaker 1: the thought that the original Trump move may not have 573 00:34:39,440 --> 00:34:42,239 Speaker 1: had a lot of legal backing and it could have 574 00:34:42,280 --> 00:34:45,279 Speaker 1: been struck down in court and maybe uh, doing this 575 00:34:45,360 --> 00:34:49,880 Speaker 1: new report through Treasury solidifies it legally. But Biden probably 576 00:34:49,880 --> 00:34:54,000 Speaker 1: could have gone with something similar a similar number of companies, 577 00:34:54,080 --> 00:34:58,120 Speaker 1: rather than a significant increase in companies getting investment blocked 578 00:34:58,200 --> 00:35:01,719 Speaker 1: Chinese companies. Uh, what do you what's your your reasoning 579 00:35:01,800 --> 00:35:04,360 Speaker 1: here for for this move by Biden? Rick, Yeah, some 580 00:35:04,480 --> 00:35:06,879 Speaker 1: of the some of it is exactly what you describe, Jack, 581 00:35:06,960 --> 00:35:09,680 Speaker 1: I mean a move to try and perfect the legal language. 582 00:35:09,960 --> 00:35:13,320 Speaker 1: I think court court had either put pressure on or 583 00:35:13,360 --> 00:35:15,799 Speaker 1: thrown out a couple of the designations because they didn't 584 00:35:15,800 --> 00:35:20,960 Speaker 1: fit a court requirement, UH, legal requirement. So some of 585 00:35:21,000 --> 00:35:22,440 Speaker 1: it was to perfect that, and some of it was 586 00:35:22,520 --> 00:35:25,520 Speaker 1: to send a message right that that that our policy 587 00:35:25,840 --> 00:35:28,959 Speaker 1: is going to be consistent with China. He's not going 588 00:35:29,080 --> 00:35:32,080 Speaker 1: to uh President Biden's not going to get soft on 589 00:35:32,200 --> 00:35:34,560 Speaker 1: China all of a sudden, which was a criticism that 590 00:35:34,680 --> 00:35:38,759 Speaker 1: the president uh labeled on him during the campaign. Right, 591 00:35:39,080 --> 00:35:41,239 Speaker 1: if we're gonna end things on a lighter note, I 592 00:35:41,400 --> 00:35:46,040 Speaker 1: just this is too strange not to mention. AP reported 593 00:35:46,080 --> 00:35:48,600 Speaker 1: today a New Mexico sheriff who's running for mayor of 594 00:35:48,680 --> 00:35:52,440 Speaker 1: Albuquerque was interrupted on stage at a campaign event by 595 00:35:52,480 --> 00:35:56,840 Speaker 1: a flying drone with let's say an adult toy attached 596 00:35:56,880 --> 00:35:59,719 Speaker 1: to it, and also a man who punched him. Uh, 597 00:36:00,000 --> 00:36:02,400 Speaker 1: have you guys, seen anything stranger when the lead doesn't 598 00:36:02,440 --> 00:36:05,720 Speaker 1: even lead with the guy getting punched at a campaign event, 599 00:36:05,920 --> 00:36:07,880 Speaker 1: can you guys think of anything straight? Rick, have you 600 00:36:07,880 --> 00:36:10,239 Speaker 1: seen anything stranger than that in your career? No? And 601 00:36:10,320 --> 00:36:12,920 Speaker 1: if you want to find strange things, always focus on 602 00:36:12,960 --> 00:36:15,920 Speaker 1: the sheriff's race because they are the most interesting races 603 00:36:15,920 --> 00:36:18,400 Speaker 1: in any state. Oh but well, I moved to the 604 00:36:18,800 --> 00:36:22,200 Speaker 1: DC from Maricopa County, Arizona, so I have to have 605 00:36:22,280 --> 00:36:26,560 Speaker 1: to agree with you on sheriff politics. Guys. That's that's 606 00:36:26,600 --> 00:36:29,560 Speaker 1: just about it for us. On a Thursday afternoon, Thank 607 00:36:29,560 --> 00:36:32,880 Speaker 1: you again to former Ambassador to Israel Daniel Kurtzer for 608 00:36:32,960 --> 00:36:36,560 Speaker 1: joining us and walking through everything happening in Israel. Rick Davis, 609 00:36:36,560 --> 00:36:39,920 Speaker 1: Bloomberg Politics contributor Kevin Walling, thank you for joining us. 610 00:36:40,080 --> 00:36:43,279 Speaker 1: A Democratic strategist at h G Creative Media. That's it 611 00:36:43,320 --> 00:36:46,040 Speaker 1: for me. I'm Jack Fitzpatrick. This is Bloomberg