WEBVTT - Epstein Files Meltdown & Climate Change 

0:00:02.759 --> 0:00:07.000
<v Speaker 1>This is Bloomberg Law with June Grossel from Bloomberg Radio.

0:00:08.760 --> 0:00:12.080
<v Speaker 1>Attorney General Pam Bondi used to say that the Jeffrey

0:00:12.119 --> 0:00:14.800
<v Speaker 1>Epstein files would be released.

0:00:15.120 --> 0:00:18.360
<v Speaker 2>You know, tens of thousands of pages of documents and

0:00:18.560 --> 0:00:24.280
<v Speaker 2>hundreds and hundreds of victims of Jeffrey Epstein. So the

0:00:24.360 --> 0:00:28.120
<v Speaker 2>FBI they have been working round the clock at my directive,

0:00:28.160 --> 0:00:31.120
<v Speaker 2>at Kashptel's directive. Now Dan Bongino's there.

0:00:30.960 --> 0:00:34.159
<v Speaker 3>Who is a great asset for all of us at

0:00:34.200 --> 0:00:37.000
<v Speaker 3>the FBI as well. But yeah, we have to protect

0:00:37.040 --> 0:00:41.159
<v Speaker 3>their identity, their personal information to make sure they're safe.

0:00:41.360 --> 0:00:44.640
<v Speaker 3>But other than that, we are releasing all of these

0:00:44.680 --> 0:00:47.200
<v Speaker 3>documents as soon as we can get them redacted.

0:00:47.760 --> 0:00:51.280
<v Speaker 1>That was Bondi on Fox in March. Now the question

0:00:51.479 --> 0:00:55.280
<v Speaker 1>is whether even a congressional subpoena will make the Attorney

0:00:55.320 --> 0:00:58.760
<v Speaker 1>General release the files, particularly in light of a Wall

0:00:58.800 --> 0:01:03.360
<v Speaker 1>Street Journal report that Bondi toll President Trump. His name

0:01:03.400 --> 0:01:07.319
<v Speaker 1>appears multiple times in the finals. As pressure on the

0:01:07.360 --> 0:01:12.399
<v Speaker 1>administration to release the Epstein files grows, the Justice Department

0:01:12.520 --> 0:01:16.920
<v Speaker 1>is taking a detour, apparently casting itself as searching for

0:01:16.959 --> 0:01:21.680
<v Speaker 1>more information on the Epstein case, with Deputy Attorney General

0:01:21.800 --> 0:01:26.959
<v Speaker 1>Todd Blanche meeting today with Glaine Maxwell, Jeffrey Epstein's former

0:01:27.040 --> 0:01:31.520
<v Speaker 1>girlfriend who's serving a twenty year sentence in Florida. Joining

0:01:31.520 --> 0:01:35.120
<v Speaker 1>me is Dave Ehrenberg, former Palm Beach County State Attorney.

0:01:35.760 --> 0:01:40.320
<v Speaker 1>Dave the number two person at the Justice Department, Todd Blanche,

0:01:40.800 --> 0:01:44.880
<v Speaker 1>Trump's former criminal defense attorney, is meeting with a convicted

0:01:45.000 --> 0:01:51.000
<v Speaker 1>sex trafficker, Gallaine Maxwell, that the Justice Department successfully prosecuted,

0:01:51.480 --> 0:01:54.880
<v Speaker 1>and it comes as she's appealing her twenty twenty one conviction.

0:01:55.840 --> 0:01:57.360
<v Speaker 1>How odd is this?

0:01:58.520 --> 0:02:03.920
<v Speaker 4>It's extremely odd because generally the number two person at

0:02:03.960 --> 0:02:09.720
<v Speaker 4>the deparminative Justice doesn't conduct interviews with potential witnesses, especially

0:02:10.120 --> 0:02:15.240
<v Speaker 4>those who have already been convicted by their department of

0:02:15.280 --> 0:02:17.520
<v Speaker 4>such a serious crime. I mean, why would you ever

0:02:17.520 --> 0:02:20.160
<v Speaker 4>believe anything this woman says. He's not only a convicted

0:02:20.400 --> 0:02:24.360
<v Speaker 4>human trafficker, but she's also a liar. She was indicted

0:02:24.480 --> 0:02:28.919
<v Speaker 4>for perjury back in twenty twenty and she is someone

0:02:28.960 --> 0:02:32.760
<v Speaker 4>who is untrustworthy. But both sides want something here. She

0:02:33.160 --> 0:02:36.920
<v Speaker 4>meaning Glen Maxwell, wants a pardon from the President who's

0:02:37.000 --> 0:02:42.359
<v Speaker 4>very transactional, and President Trump wants her to exonerate him

0:02:42.360 --> 0:02:44.679
<v Speaker 4>to say that Trump had nothing to do with any

0:02:44.720 --> 0:02:48.119
<v Speaker 4>of the crimes. Now, I personally believe that Trump had

0:02:48.120 --> 0:02:50.959
<v Speaker 4>nothing to do with any of the crimes. But there's

0:02:50.960 --> 0:02:54.320
<v Speaker 4>a lot of smoke here because of Trump's name being

0:02:54.360 --> 0:02:56.920
<v Speaker 4>in the Epstein files. And you know what they say,

0:02:56.960 --> 0:02:59.000
<v Speaker 4>it's not the crime but the cover up. And the

0:02:59.120 --> 0:03:02.000
<v Speaker 4>cover up here is to prevent the release of these

0:03:02.040 --> 0:03:04.840
<v Speaker 4>files when you promised it over and over again to

0:03:04.919 --> 0:03:07.800
<v Speaker 4>your supporters. So, yes, this whole thing is extraordinary. Not

0:03:07.840 --> 0:03:10.040
<v Speaker 4>the lease of which is that the number two person

0:03:10.080 --> 0:03:12.799
<v Speaker 4>of the Department of Justice doesn't get on a plane

0:03:13.200 --> 0:03:15.959
<v Speaker 4>and get a briefcase in a notepad and start acting

0:03:16.080 --> 0:03:17.480
<v Speaker 4>like a line prosecutor.

0:03:18.040 --> 0:03:21.000
<v Speaker 1>Bland said he wants to know if Glaine Maxwell has

0:03:21.040 --> 0:03:25.280
<v Speaker 1>information about anyone who has committed crimes against victims. But

0:03:25.680 --> 0:03:28.880
<v Speaker 1>the Attorney General, Pam Bondi, has said that nothing in

0:03:28.919 --> 0:03:34.240
<v Speaker 1>the files warranted further investigation or prosecution. So what's going on?

0:03:35.040 --> 0:03:39.560
<v Speaker 4>This is about CYA. It's to protect Donald Trump. This

0:03:39.720 --> 0:03:43.440
<v Speaker 4>is to protect him because his name is in the files. Now,

0:03:43.960 --> 0:03:46.800
<v Speaker 4>his supporters were led to believe that anyone whose names

0:03:46.800 --> 0:03:48.840
<v Speaker 4>in the files must have committed some crimes. They were

0:03:48.880 --> 0:03:50.400
<v Speaker 4>led to believe that the number one name in the

0:03:50.400 --> 0:03:52.880
<v Speaker 4>file would be Bill Clinton, filed by Bill Gates and

0:03:52.920 --> 0:03:55.360
<v Speaker 4>then every other prominent Democrat. Of course, they were lied to,

0:03:56.000 --> 0:03:58.440
<v Speaker 4>they were made to look like fools. I mean, these

0:03:58.520 --> 0:04:03.480
<v Speaker 4>folks thrive on conspiracy theories and now they're outraged and

0:04:03.520 --> 0:04:06.480
<v Speaker 4>they're ready to revolt. So the administration is trying to

0:04:06.600 --> 0:04:09.560
<v Speaker 4>placate them further by saying, see, we'll get more information

0:04:09.720 --> 0:04:14.240
<v Speaker 4>from this disgraced, convicted human trafficker. Well, what makes you

0:04:14.240 --> 0:04:16.640
<v Speaker 4>think she'll be telling the truth? She has every incentive

0:04:16.680 --> 0:04:20.240
<v Speaker 4>to lie. She's lie before, she will lie again. Anything

0:04:20.279 --> 0:04:23.159
<v Speaker 4>that she says should be corroborated. And then if she

0:04:23.200 --> 0:04:25.760
<v Speaker 4>says something to Todd blanche who was President of Trump's

0:04:26.120 --> 0:04:29.800
<v Speaker 4>former defense lawyer, his personal defense lawyer, what makes you

0:04:29.839 --> 0:04:31.720
<v Speaker 4>think will make its way to the public if it

0:04:31.800 --> 0:04:35.559
<v Speaker 4>at all implicates Donald Trump. So this is not how

0:04:36.040 --> 0:04:39.960
<v Speaker 4>an investigation should be done. And if the administration wanted

0:04:40.000 --> 0:04:43.640
<v Speaker 4>full transparency, they should just release the file subject to

0:04:43.800 --> 0:04:47.560
<v Speaker 4>court orders and other privacy concerns involving the victims, and

0:04:48.040 --> 0:04:51.479
<v Speaker 4>then I think people would start to move on from

0:04:51.480 --> 0:04:55.359
<v Speaker 4>this story. But until that happens, this story ain't going away.

0:04:55.400 --> 0:04:58.560
<v Speaker 1>Did you think that she's talking to Blanche. If she

0:04:58.680 --> 0:05:00.719
<v Speaker 1>is talking to Blanche, do you think that she's talking

0:05:00.720 --> 0:05:03.240
<v Speaker 1>to him under some kind of agreement like queen for

0:05:03.320 --> 0:05:06.000
<v Speaker 1>a day where nothing you say is going to be

0:05:06.080 --> 0:05:06.920
<v Speaker 1>used against you.

0:05:08.000 --> 0:05:11.120
<v Speaker 4>Her lawyers would never allow her to talk to a prosecutor,

0:05:11.160 --> 0:05:13.640
<v Speaker 4>even if it's the number two person at the Department

0:05:13.680 --> 0:05:16.280
<v Speaker 4>of Justice and not aligned prosecutor. They would never let

0:05:16.279 --> 0:05:19.280
<v Speaker 4>her talk to anyone without a guarantee that she has

0:05:19.360 --> 0:05:22.320
<v Speaker 4>immunity for at least those comments on that day. So

0:05:22.600 --> 0:05:25.880
<v Speaker 4>some call it a Queen for the day. But she's

0:05:26.080 --> 0:05:32.320
<v Speaker 4>not going to jeopardize her appeal and her potential because

0:05:32.320 --> 0:05:34.919
<v Speaker 4>she has an appeal pending if she is retried. She

0:05:34.960 --> 0:05:37.280
<v Speaker 4>doesn't want this information to come back and haunt her.

0:05:37.320 --> 0:05:40.000
<v Speaker 4>So she wants something out of Donald Trump. She wants

0:05:40.000 --> 0:05:43.520
<v Speaker 4>a pardon, and she's probably going to be willing to

0:05:43.520 --> 0:05:46.240
<v Speaker 4>say anything to get it, but she doesn't want it

0:05:46.279 --> 0:05:48.880
<v Speaker 4>to come back at her in a future trial. So yes,

0:05:49.120 --> 0:05:51.640
<v Speaker 4>she will get some sort of immunity before she speaks

0:05:51.640 --> 0:05:54.360
<v Speaker 4>to Todd Blash. Now she goes before Congress, that too

0:05:54.400 --> 0:05:56.839
<v Speaker 4>will require immunity because her lawyers, I would think, would

0:05:56.880 --> 0:05:59.039
<v Speaker 4>have the same issue They don't want her to implicate

0:05:59.040 --> 0:06:01.120
<v Speaker 4>herself any more than she already has.

0:06:01.520 --> 0:06:04.560
<v Speaker 1>Her brother told The New York Post that she's compiling

0:06:04.680 --> 0:06:10.000
<v Speaker 1>new evidence pretending to allege government misconduct stemming from her trial,

0:06:10.120 --> 0:06:12.760
<v Speaker 1>to hand over to the Justice Department.

0:06:13.400 --> 0:06:18.280
<v Speaker 4>Every criminal defendant believes that there's government misconduct for their case,

0:06:18.360 --> 0:06:22.040
<v Speaker 4>especially if you're convicted. So yeah, she's going to compile

0:06:22.160 --> 0:06:25.480
<v Speaker 4>her evidence. Meanwhile, she had any real evidence that could

0:06:25.520 --> 0:06:28.400
<v Speaker 4>be of use to the government to release the victims

0:06:28.400 --> 0:06:30.560
<v Speaker 4>and to the public, she would have done so already

0:06:30.600 --> 0:06:32.800
<v Speaker 4>because now she's facing twenty years in prison. She's not

0:06:32.839 --> 0:06:35.440
<v Speaker 4>getting out until she's seventy five years old at the earliest.

0:06:36.240 --> 0:06:39.839
<v Speaker 4>And so if she didn't have the goods back then,

0:06:40.279 --> 0:06:42.479
<v Speaker 4>why would we believe she has the goods now. I

0:06:42.480 --> 0:06:45.120
<v Speaker 4>think there's a desperate woman who was willing to say anything.

0:06:45.760 --> 0:06:48.600
<v Speaker 4>She'll do anything for a pardon. She does not want

0:06:48.600 --> 0:06:53.400
<v Speaker 4>to spend her next decade or so behind bars. She's

0:06:53.400 --> 0:06:56.760
<v Speaker 4>not used to this lifestyle. She's used to the high life,

0:06:56.800 --> 0:07:00.440
<v Speaker 4>life of privilege, life of prestige, and now she's the

0:07:00.480 --> 0:07:03.239
<v Speaker 4>only one being locked up for the whole Jeffrey Epstein

0:07:03.600 --> 0:07:05.480
<v Speaker 4>saga because Jeffrey Epstein killed himself.

0:07:06.640 --> 0:07:12.600
<v Speaker 1>Dave about the congressional subpoena. The House Overside Chair Republican

0:07:12.720 --> 0:07:16.480
<v Speaker 1>James Comer has subpoenaed Maxwell for a deposition. In what

0:07:16.560 --> 0:07:20.720
<v Speaker 1>circumstances would her lawyer allow her to testify? How would

0:07:20.800 --> 0:07:23.600
<v Speaker 1>that kind of testimony help her at all?

0:07:24.760 --> 0:07:28.760
<v Speaker 4>It will help her if she publicly exonerates President Trump.

0:07:29.040 --> 0:07:31.600
<v Speaker 4>It will help her get a pardon. That's what she's

0:07:31.640 --> 0:07:35.560
<v Speaker 4>aiming for. She wants either a pardon a commutation. She

0:07:35.720 --> 0:07:38.560
<v Speaker 4>wants the Department of Justice to not retry the case

0:07:38.600 --> 0:07:40.720
<v Speaker 4>if she wins on her appeal, which is going before

0:07:40.720 --> 0:07:43.440
<v Speaker 4>the Supreme Court. So there are things that Trump can

0:07:43.480 --> 0:07:46.240
<v Speaker 4>offer her, and that's why she'll be doing this. Otherwise,

0:07:46.240 --> 0:07:47.920
<v Speaker 4>there's no reason for her to be doing this. I mean,

0:07:48.440 --> 0:07:53.000
<v Speaker 4>she's a convicted human trafficker, she's a proven liar. She's

0:07:53.040 --> 0:07:57.960
<v Speaker 4>a criminal. And for the Magabase, which thinks that Jeffrey

0:07:57.960 --> 0:08:01.040
<v Speaker 4>Epstein is Satan himself, to me how they're willing to

0:08:01.400 --> 0:08:04.800
<v Speaker 4>roll out the red carpet for Satan's accomplice.

0:08:05.400 --> 0:08:09.400
<v Speaker 1>The House Oversight sub Committee voted Wednesday to subpoena the

0:08:09.480 --> 0:08:14.080
<v Speaker 1>DOJ for the Epstein files. And they're not only looking

0:08:14.080 --> 0:08:18.560
<v Speaker 1>for the files, but also communications between former Biden officials

0:08:19.120 --> 0:08:24.360
<v Speaker 1>and the Justice Department related to the Epstein matter. Well,

0:08:24.400 --> 0:08:27.600
<v Speaker 1>the Justice Department hand them over, especially now that the

0:08:27.640 --> 0:08:32.360
<v Speaker 1>Wall Street Journal has reported that Bondie and Blanche informed

0:08:32.360 --> 0:08:36.520
<v Speaker 1>the President in May that his name appears multiple times

0:08:36.559 --> 0:08:37.840
<v Speaker 1>in the Epstein files.

0:08:38.720 --> 0:08:42.640
<v Speaker 4>Oh, the Department of Justice is not giving Congress anything

0:08:42.760 --> 0:08:45.679
<v Speaker 4>with Donald Trump's name in it. So if they give

0:08:45.760 --> 0:08:48.040
<v Speaker 4>up the Epstein file, maybe will be a redacted version

0:08:48.040 --> 0:08:50.240
<v Speaker 4>of it. But they're not going to do anything to

0:08:50.280 --> 0:08:53.000
<v Speaker 4>harm the Boss. I mean, that's why the folks are

0:08:53.040 --> 0:08:55.560
<v Speaker 4>there to begin with. That's why Donald Trump put his

0:08:55.640 --> 0:08:59.280
<v Speaker 4>two defense lawyers at top positions at the Department of Justice.

0:08:59.280 --> 0:09:01.600
<v Speaker 4>That's why I picked the loyalists like Pam Bondi to

0:09:01.600 --> 0:09:05.120
<v Speaker 4>be Attorney General. He doesn't want this thing to get

0:09:05.160 --> 0:09:07.480
<v Speaker 4>out of hand and get a mind of its own.

0:09:07.520 --> 0:09:09.840
<v Speaker 4>That's why he's not going to appoint a special counsel.

0:09:10.240 --> 0:09:12.800
<v Speaker 4>People said, we should have a special counsel. Yeah, well,

0:09:12.880 --> 0:09:15.240
<v Speaker 4>I remember Bill Clinton had a special counsel. You remember

0:09:15.280 --> 0:09:19.480
<v Speaker 4>Janerino stepped aside and had Kenneth Starr investigate Whitewater. Well,

0:09:19.559 --> 0:09:23.240
<v Speaker 4>the investigation in Whitewater became an investigation into Monica Lewinsky

0:09:23.280 --> 0:09:26.319
<v Speaker 4>and led to Bill Clinton's impeachment. Donald Trump doesn't want

0:09:26.320 --> 0:09:28.240
<v Speaker 4>to go down that road. He wants to button this

0:09:28.240 --> 0:09:31.600
<v Speaker 4>thing up. But the irony is in his attempt to

0:09:31.679 --> 0:09:35.480
<v Speaker 4>cut this off at its knees, he has prolonged the agony.

0:09:36.120 --> 0:09:38.040
<v Speaker 4>It's not the crime, it's the cover up. And it

0:09:38.040 --> 0:09:39.679
<v Speaker 4>looks like there's been a cover up here, at least

0:09:39.679 --> 0:09:42.040
<v Speaker 4>the many in the public, which is why people are

0:09:42.040 --> 0:09:42.960
<v Speaker 4>still talking about this.

0:09:43.640 --> 0:09:47.640
<v Speaker 1>Does Congress have any levers to pull to force the

0:09:47.760 --> 0:09:48.840
<v Speaker 1>Justice Department on this?

0:09:49.600 --> 0:09:52.720
<v Speaker 4>They can subpoena the documents and then go to court,

0:09:52.760 --> 0:09:55.280
<v Speaker 4>but you really think the Republicans in Congress are going

0:09:55.320 --> 0:09:57.680
<v Speaker 4>to go to court to fight the Republicans and the

0:09:57.760 --> 0:10:01.160
<v Speaker 4>executive branch. One thing we've learned from this is that

0:10:01.240 --> 0:10:04.360
<v Speaker 4>when the going gets tough, they roll over, They turn

0:10:04.440 --> 0:10:08.360
<v Speaker 4>tail and run away. This Congress has a masculated itself

0:10:08.640 --> 0:10:11.360
<v Speaker 4>to the executive branch. And I know they're starting to

0:10:11.360 --> 0:10:14.839
<v Speaker 4>sense penisn't ask questions about this because their base demands it.

0:10:14.880 --> 0:10:16.880
<v Speaker 4>Both They'll only go so far. Donald Trump is the

0:10:16.960 --> 0:10:19.800
<v Speaker 4>leader of their party, and when Donald Trump wants something

0:10:20.000 --> 0:10:21.720
<v Speaker 4>badly enough, he gets it.

0:10:22.000 --> 0:10:25.440
<v Speaker 1>Coming up next, why a Florida judge decided not to

0:10:25.480 --> 0:10:28.800
<v Speaker 1>release the transcripts. This is Bloomberg. I've been talking to

0:10:28.880 --> 0:10:32.320
<v Speaker 1>Dave Ehrenberg, former Palm Beach County state attorney, about the

0:10:32.320 --> 0:10:36.680
<v Speaker 1>pressure on the Trump administration to release the Jeffrey Epstein files.

0:10:37.480 --> 0:10:40.480
<v Speaker 1>Let's talk about the grand jury transcripts first. You can

0:10:40.520 --> 0:10:45.360
<v Speaker 1>explain why the transcripts will not reveal client lists or

0:10:45.400 --> 0:10:49.360
<v Speaker 1>any of the other things that the conspiracy theorists are

0:10:49.400 --> 0:10:50.040
<v Speaker 1>looking for.

0:10:50.960 --> 0:10:54.680
<v Speaker 4>The grand jury transcripts are just a portion of the

0:10:54.679 --> 0:10:57.400
<v Speaker 4>portion of what people are looking for. See what they

0:10:57.400 --> 0:10:59.559
<v Speaker 4>wanted the Epstein files. They want the names of these

0:10:59.559 --> 0:11:02.960
<v Speaker 4>third parts parties who allegedly were involved with human trafficking.

0:11:03.040 --> 0:11:07.120
<v Speaker 4>Who were these girls trafficked too, That's what people are seeking.

0:11:07.600 --> 0:11:10.680
<v Speaker 4>That's not going to be in the grand jury transcripts,

0:11:10.920 --> 0:11:13.040
<v Speaker 4>especially redacted once. It's not going to be in there.

0:11:13.600 --> 0:11:16.440
<v Speaker 4>So it's pretty much a distraction that the administration is

0:11:16.480 --> 0:11:18.960
<v Speaker 4>just seeking these grand jury transcripts and we come on.

0:11:19.280 --> 0:11:21.160
<v Speaker 4>First of all, they're not going to get him. The

0:11:21.280 --> 0:11:23.880
<v Speaker 4>judges will reject it, and then they can blame the judiciary,

0:11:23.880 --> 0:11:26.000
<v Speaker 4>which is part of the strategy because if there's one

0:11:26.040 --> 0:11:28.720
<v Speaker 4>group that the MAGA world hates more than the media,

0:11:28.800 --> 0:11:31.960
<v Speaker 4>it's the judiciary. It's judges. So that was actually a

0:11:32.000 --> 0:11:34.120
<v Speaker 4>smart move I thought by Trump to put the focus

0:11:34.120 --> 0:11:35.640
<v Speaker 4>on the judges. But it's still not going to work.

0:11:35.679 --> 0:11:38.520
<v Speaker 4>It's not going to satisfy the MAGA base who've been

0:11:38.760 --> 0:11:41.559
<v Speaker 4>led to believe there's this client list and that you

0:11:41.720 --> 0:11:46.120
<v Speaker 4>have this democratic conspiracy to have a child sex trafficking green. Well,

0:11:46.320 --> 0:11:48.120
<v Speaker 4>it's a different role when you go from being a

0:11:48.120 --> 0:11:50.360
<v Speaker 4>blogger to being in government. When you're in government, you

0:11:50.400 --> 0:11:52.720
<v Speaker 4>got to produce. When you're a blogger, you can say

0:11:52.720 --> 0:11:55.720
<v Speaker 4>whatever you want and never be held accountable for it.

0:11:55.760 --> 0:11:58.160
<v Speaker 4>And that's a lesson that Caspitel and Dan Begino and

0:11:58.160 --> 0:11:58.880
<v Speaker 4>others are learning.

0:11:59.200 --> 0:12:02.440
<v Speaker 1>The Florida said judge has already declined to release the

0:12:02.480 --> 0:12:04.800
<v Speaker 1>transcripts on what grounds.

0:12:05.000 --> 0:12:07.720
<v Speaker 4>There are grand jury secrecy rules and you can't get

0:12:07.800 --> 0:12:12.600
<v Speaker 4>the grand jury transcripts unless you have an exception under

0:12:13.000 --> 0:12:15.800
<v Speaker 4>the federal law, and there's no exception here just because

0:12:15.800 --> 0:12:18.600
<v Speaker 4>the public wants to see it. Also, you need to

0:12:18.640 --> 0:12:21.199
<v Speaker 4>go to victims and get their permission and approvals, but

0:12:21.280 --> 0:12:23.480
<v Speaker 4>the administration didn't do that. They just went right to

0:12:23.480 --> 0:12:25.240
<v Speaker 4>the judge because it was about the show. It wasn't

0:12:25.240 --> 0:12:27.480
<v Speaker 4>about to go. It was about the show. They wanted

0:12:27.480 --> 0:12:30.640
<v Speaker 4>the public to think that they were doing something about transparency.

0:12:30.720 --> 0:12:33.400
<v Speaker 4>But the judge rule, as we all expected, the judge

0:12:33.400 --> 0:12:36.280
<v Speaker 4>the rule. But even if the judge did produce these

0:12:36.520 --> 0:12:39.400
<v Speaker 4>grand jury transcripts, I mean, it's really, as I said,

0:12:39.440 --> 0:12:42.400
<v Speaker 4>just a portion of what the public wants. The public

0:12:42.440 --> 0:12:46.120
<v Speaker 4>wants names. Grand jury transcripts wouldn't produce those names of

0:12:46.200 --> 0:12:49.680
<v Speaker 4>third parties. It would just be the testimony that was

0:12:49.720 --> 0:12:53.200
<v Speaker 4>written down and the exhibits that were provided inside the

0:12:53.200 --> 0:12:57.319
<v Speaker 4>secret grand jury that led to Epstein's indictment. It's not

0:12:57.360 --> 0:13:03.160
<v Speaker 4>going to be what implicates uncharged third parties. And so

0:13:03.400 --> 0:13:06.559
<v Speaker 4>if you are waiting for the grand jury transcripts to

0:13:06.640 --> 0:13:10.040
<v Speaker 4>answer your at Jeffrey Epstein questions, you'll be waiting a

0:13:10.080 --> 0:13:10.720
<v Speaker 4>long time.

0:13:11.880 --> 0:13:15.520
<v Speaker 1>There are still two judges in New York considering the

0:13:15.520 --> 0:13:19.520
<v Speaker 1>government's requests to release the grand jury transcripts in the

0:13:19.520 --> 0:13:24.679
<v Speaker 1>Epstein and Maxwell cases. They're taking more time and requesting

0:13:24.720 --> 0:13:28.400
<v Speaker 1>more information. What do you think they're just not, you know,

0:13:28.480 --> 0:13:31.479
<v Speaker 1>denying them out of hand and saying grand jury secrecy.

0:13:32.720 --> 0:13:36.120
<v Speaker 4>The rules up there in that circuit in New York

0:13:36.280 --> 0:13:41.079
<v Speaker 4>are a little better for the public to get access

0:13:41.240 --> 0:13:44.920
<v Speaker 4>to grand jury transcripts. There's there's a slight opening. It's

0:13:44.960 --> 0:13:48.640
<v Speaker 4>not impossible. It's hard, but it's not impossible. So there's

0:13:48.679 --> 0:13:50.880
<v Speaker 4>an outside chance that could happen up there. But as

0:13:50.920 --> 0:13:54.240
<v Speaker 4>I said, even if you get them, they're going to

0:13:54.240 --> 0:13:56.560
<v Speaker 4>be disappointing. They're going to be largely a nothing burger

0:13:56.600 --> 0:14:00.720
<v Speaker 4>of people, and it probably suits Trump more if the

0:14:00.800 --> 0:14:03.840
<v Speaker 4>judges just reject the request, then Trump can say, see,

0:14:03.840 --> 0:14:07.319
<v Speaker 4>I tried, I try to be transparent. Blame those unelected

0:14:07.600 --> 0:14:09.880
<v Speaker 4>liberal judges, even though he may have appointed some of them.

0:14:09.880 --> 0:14:13.240
<v Speaker 4>But you can just blame the people wearing the black

0:14:13.280 --> 0:14:15.760
<v Speaker 4>ropes who get lifetime appointments and carry the gabble. Much

0:14:15.800 --> 0:14:19.560
<v Speaker 4>easier to do than to turn and shine the flashlight

0:14:19.600 --> 0:14:20.120
<v Speaker 4>on yourself.

0:14:20.680 --> 0:14:23.640
<v Speaker 1>And I want to get your reaction to the Trump

0:14:23.680 --> 0:14:31.080
<v Speaker 1>administration falsely claiming that President Obama deliberately manufactured and politicized

0:14:31.120 --> 0:14:35.640
<v Speaker 1>intelligence reports about Russian interference in the twenty sixteen election.

0:14:36.040 --> 0:14:37.840
<v Speaker 1>I don't know how we got back to this point.

0:14:38.280 --> 0:14:39.400
<v Speaker 1>Do you know what this is about?

0:14:39.760 --> 0:14:42.840
<v Speaker 4>Yeah, it's about distraction. It's to take your mind off

0:14:42.880 --> 0:14:47.560
<v Speaker 4>of the Jeffrey Epstein situation. So he has Pulsey Gabbert,

0:14:47.600 --> 0:14:50.600
<v Speaker 4>who has no business being in government. Quite frankly, she's

0:14:50.600 --> 0:14:52.920
<v Speaker 4>a hack. She's not qualified to be the director of

0:14:53.000 --> 0:14:56.000
<v Speaker 4>D and I, and she's doing Pulsy Gabbert things by

0:14:56.960 --> 0:15:00.880
<v Speaker 4>creating a story out of nothing. Even what she produced

0:15:01.320 --> 0:15:04.800
<v Speaker 4>doesn't show what she says it shows. All shows is

0:15:04.800 --> 0:15:09.120
<v Speaker 4>that Russia did not manipulate votes. They did not change

0:15:09.120 --> 0:15:12.000
<v Speaker 4>the outcome of the election by the voting. But they did,

0:15:12.080 --> 0:15:15.160
<v Speaker 4>and it's been proven over and over again, even by

0:15:15.280 --> 0:15:18.680
<v Speaker 4>the report by Senator Marco Rubio's Senate Intelligence Committee that

0:15:18.760 --> 0:15:21.320
<v Speaker 4>Russia did interfere with the election. They had a favorite

0:15:21.320 --> 0:15:25.000
<v Speaker 4>in the election, Donald Trump, and they had a strategy

0:15:25.040 --> 0:15:30.360
<v Speaker 4>that they implemented to get involved through spreading disinformation. But

0:15:30.400 --> 0:15:32.560
<v Speaker 4>they didn't hack into voting machines. So I don't know

0:15:32.600 --> 0:15:35.400
<v Speaker 4>what this thing is about that Tulsa Gabbert is trying

0:15:35.440 --> 0:15:38.760
<v Speaker 4>to show, except it's nothing except for a distraction on

0:15:38.800 --> 0:15:42.800
<v Speaker 4>the Jeffrey Epstein matter and approves why Tulsa Gabbard is

0:15:43.120 --> 0:15:44.200
<v Speaker 4>unfit for office.

0:15:44.520 --> 0:15:49.600
<v Speaker 1>Obama spokesman said these bizarre allegations are ridiculous and a

0:15:49.640 --> 0:15:52.840
<v Speaker 1>weak attempt at distraction. I mean, this is not the

0:15:52.880 --> 0:15:55.320
<v Speaker 1>first time that Trump has attacked Obama.

0:15:55.920 --> 0:15:58.800
<v Speaker 4>Well, that's how he built his political career by claiming

0:15:58.840 --> 0:16:02.680
<v Speaker 4>that Obama born in Kenya. This is why the magabase

0:16:02.840 --> 0:16:06.840
<v Speaker 4>is so upset about this latest conspiracy theory, because they

0:16:07.080 --> 0:16:11.000
<v Speaker 4>were led to believe that there are conspiracies under every

0:16:11.680 --> 0:16:15.880
<v Speaker 4>mattress in DC, whether it's Obama being from Kenya, or

0:16:15.920 --> 0:16:18.440
<v Speaker 4>the election of twenty twenty being stolen, or Jeffrey Epstein

0:16:18.680 --> 0:16:21.520
<v Speaker 4>being part of a Democrat at cabal. But as the

0:16:22.080 --> 0:16:26.960
<v Speaker 4>conspiracy theories get destroyed, the magabases is starting to wonder

0:16:27.080 --> 0:16:31.600
<v Speaker 4>if they've been misled, if they've been made to look

0:16:31.680 --> 0:16:37.000
<v Speaker 4>like fools, And they're understandably point their finger at their

0:16:37.040 --> 0:16:39.920
<v Speaker 4>own team because their own team is the one who

0:16:39.960 --> 0:16:40.800
<v Speaker 4>has led them astray.

0:16:41.560 --> 0:16:44.360
<v Speaker 1>Turning to other legal news, one of the world's most

0:16:44.560 --> 0:16:48.560
<v Speaker 1>vulnerable countries to the fallout from climate change has won

0:16:48.600 --> 0:16:52.920
<v Speaker 1>a landmark legal battle, giving countries new ammunition to pursue

0:16:52.960 --> 0:16:57.040
<v Speaker 1>some of the planet's biggest emitters. Joining me is environmental

0:16:57.120 --> 0:17:01.360
<v Speaker 1>law expert Michael Girard, director of Columbia Law schools Saban

0:17:01.480 --> 0:17:05.400
<v Speaker 1>Center for Climate Change Law, tell us about this decision

0:17:05.480 --> 0:17:07.840
<v Speaker 1>by the International Court of Justice.

0:17:08.320 --> 0:17:11.879
<v Speaker 5>So the International Court of Justice just issued a unanimous

0:17:11.880 --> 0:17:16.320
<v Speaker 5>opinion by all fourteen of its judges on climate change.

0:17:16.640 --> 0:17:20.120
<v Speaker 5>The decision said that climate change is a grave threat

0:17:20.200 --> 0:17:25.879
<v Speaker 5>to humankind and many elements of international law require every

0:17:25.920 --> 0:17:29.920
<v Speaker 5>country to act very strongly to try to fight climate change.

0:17:30.119 --> 0:17:32.240
<v Speaker 1>And tell us about the case that was brought to

0:17:32.440 --> 0:17:33.359
<v Speaker 1>years ago by.

0:17:33.280 --> 0:17:37.200
<v Speaker 5>Vanuatu vano Watu, which is one of the small island

0:17:37.280 --> 0:17:41.280
<v Speaker 5>nations in the Pacific that is really endangered by subl rise,

0:17:41.359 --> 0:17:46.159
<v Speaker 5>who was able to organize an international effort and persuade

0:17:46.160 --> 0:17:50.680
<v Speaker 5>the UN General Assembly to send to the International Court

0:17:50.720 --> 0:17:53.879
<v Speaker 5>of Justice in the Hague questions about what are the

0:17:53.920 --> 0:17:59.399
<v Speaker 5>obligations of countries to reduce their greenhouse assmentions and among

0:17:59.440 --> 0:18:03.480
<v Speaker 5>other things, to save small island states and everybody else

0:18:03.520 --> 0:18:05.480
<v Speaker 5>from the ravages of climate change.

0:18:05.640 --> 0:18:10.440
<v Speaker 1>The ICJ doesn't have the power to enforce the decision

0:18:10.560 --> 0:18:14.479
<v Speaker 1>on its own. US is among the countries that doesn't

0:18:14.880 --> 0:18:18.879
<v Speaker 1>automatically recognize its legal authority. So what weight does this

0:18:19.160 --> 0:18:19.879
<v Speaker 1>opinion have.

0:18:20.760 --> 0:18:24.480
<v Speaker 5>That's right, the ICJ opinions in this kind of case

0:18:24.520 --> 0:18:27.720
<v Speaker 5>our advisory. They don't have enforcement power. Many countries of

0:18:27.760 --> 0:18:32.760
<v Speaker 5>the world do take the ICJ's decisions seriously, and we've

0:18:32.800 --> 0:18:36.480
<v Speaker 5>already seen in quite a few countries around the world

0:18:36.480 --> 0:18:40.520
<v Speaker 5>decisions by their own courts saying that their governments aren't

0:18:40.520 --> 0:18:43.119
<v Speaker 5>doing enough. I think we'll see a lot more of

0:18:43.240 --> 0:18:46.480
<v Speaker 5>those kinds of lawsuits all around the world. We'll see

0:18:46.520 --> 0:18:51.160
<v Speaker 5>more lawsuits brought by environmental groups and others in their

0:18:51.280 --> 0:18:55.160
<v Speaker 5>national courts saying that under the ICJ opinion and other

0:18:55.440 --> 0:18:59.119
<v Speaker 5>legal doctrines, those countries are not doing enough to produce

0:18:59.160 --> 0:19:01.840
<v Speaker 5>their green ask gas missions, and that could lead to

0:19:02.840 --> 0:19:07.200
<v Speaker 5>enforcement by those national courts against those national governments.

0:19:07.760 --> 0:19:09.840
<v Speaker 1>Last year, at least two hundred and twenty six new

0:19:09.920 --> 0:19:14.879
<v Speaker 1>climate cases were brought. Are those mostly against countries? Are

0:19:14.920 --> 0:19:18.560
<v Speaker 1>they against you know, corporations? You know? Where are they

0:19:18.560 --> 0:19:19.480
<v Speaker 1>bringing these suits?

0:19:19.840 --> 0:19:22.600
<v Speaker 5>They're mostly against countries, but very few of them are

0:19:22.680 --> 0:19:24.880
<v Speaker 5>what we call strategic litigation, that is trying to get

0:19:24.920 --> 0:19:28.560
<v Speaker 5>the country to act more broadly, Most of those lawsuits

0:19:28.560 --> 0:19:33.800
<v Speaker 5>are concerning particular projects or our particular small actions. But

0:19:33.840 --> 0:19:38.119
<v Speaker 5>we have seen strategic cases that are ordering countries to

0:19:38.160 --> 0:19:46.080
<v Speaker 5>do more. We saw them in successful cases the Netherlands, Germany, France, Mexico, Nepal, Brazil,

0:19:47.280 --> 0:19:51.720
<v Speaker 5>South Africa. Most recently Hungary, several other countries all around

0:19:51.720 --> 0:19:54.320
<v Speaker 5>the world. We're seeing these kinds of cases, these kinds

0:19:54.359 --> 0:19:57.480
<v Speaker 5>of decisions from the courts, and I think now we'll

0:19:57.520 --> 0:19:58.600
<v Speaker 5>see more of them.

0:19:58.760 --> 0:20:01.720
<v Speaker 1>And our countries complain vying with the results of these

0:20:01.840 --> 0:20:03.960
<v Speaker 1>cases when they're decided.

0:20:04.080 --> 0:20:08.280
<v Speaker 5>Not necessarily that's a very good question. We've seen that

0:20:08.560 --> 0:20:12.879
<v Speaker 5>the countries are doing something but not necessarily enough, and

0:20:13.040 --> 0:20:16.280
<v Speaker 5>frequently the plaintives go back to court to try to

0:20:16.320 --> 0:20:20.320
<v Speaker 5>seek more specific enforcement. So the decisions do have a

0:20:20.359 --> 0:20:24.280
<v Speaker 5>positive effect, but they're not completely solving the problem.

0:20:24.920 --> 0:20:27.960
<v Speaker 1>Are there other international courts that are taking a stand

0:20:28.040 --> 0:20:30.119
<v Speaker 1>on climate Yes.

0:20:30.280 --> 0:20:32.160
<v Speaker 5>In the last year and a half or so, we've

0:20:32.200 --> 0:20:35.960
<v Speaker 5>seen decisions from the European Court of Human Rights, the

0:20:36.000 --> 0:20:40.040
<v Speaker 5>Inter American Court of Human Rights, and the International Tribunal

0:20:40.119 --> 0:20:43.040
<v Speaker 5>on the Law of the Sea, and all three of

0:20:43.080 --> 0:20:47.520
<v Speaker 5>those international tribunals also said that the countries have an

0:20:47.560 --> 0:20:51.280
<v Speaker 5>obligation to reduce their green ass gas emissions and otherwise

0:20:51.320 --> 0:20:52.679
<v Speaker 5>address climate change.

0:20:52.960 --> 0:20:57.840
<v Speaker 1>Is litigation the best way forward for climate activists or

0:20:57.880 --> 0:21:00.240
<v Speaker 1>negotiations ongoing anywhere?

0:21:00.720 --> 0:21:03.840
<v Speaker 5>I wouldn't say that litigation is necessarily the best way.

0:21:03.920 --> 0:21:06.800
<v Speaker 5>I think the best way is to try to get

0:21:06.800 --> 0:21:10.960
<v Speaker 5>politicians to pass and implement strong laws, but in few

0:21:11.000 --> 0:21:14.960
<v Speaker 5>countries as that actually happens. So litigation is one important

0:21:14.960 --> 0:21:17.879
<v Speaker 5>part of the toolkit. It's not the biggest part, but

0:21:17.920 --> 0:21:20.000
<v Speaker 5>it's one important part, and it just became a lot

0:21:20.080 --> 0:21:22.000
<v Speaker 5>stronger with yesterday's decision.

0:21:22.240 --> 0:21:25.879
<v Speaker 1>As far as the United States and the Trump administration,

0:21:26.520 --> 0:21:32.400
<v Speaker 1>how has the Trump administration impacted the environment and environmental protections?

0:21:32.720 --> 0:21:36.040
<v Speaker 5>Well, the Trump administration is basically a denying climate change,

0:21:36.080 --> 0:21:37.840
<v Speaker 5>or at least that they have to do anything about it.

0:21:38.040 --> 0:21:42.600
<v Speaker 5>They're working very hard to stop all of the actions

0:21:42.640 --> 0:21:47.360
<v Speaker 5>that had been taken under previous administrations to control climate change.

0:21:47.600 --> 0:21:51.840
<v Speaker 5>They again withdrew from the Paris Climate Agreement. So the

0:21:51.880 --> 0:21:55.520
<v Speaker 5>Trump administration is very much moving backwards on all of this.

0:21:56.200 --> 0:22:00.320
<v Speaker 1>Let's say that after Trump's term ends, there as a

0:22:00.520 --> 0:22:04.840
<v Speaker 1>president who is more concerned about the environment. Can the

0:22:04.840 --> 0:22:07.840
<v Speaker 1>Trump administration's actions be easily reversed.

0:22:08.200 --> 0:22:11.200
<v Speaker 5>They can be reversed, but it will take time. Of course.

0:22:11.200 --> 0:22:14.760
<v Speaker 5>In the first Trump administration they moved backwards, although not

0:22:14.840 --> 0:22:17.440
<v Speaker 5>as faster as quickly, and then when Biden came in,

0:22:17.720 --> 0:22:20.320
<v Speaker 5>they did reverse of that and secured passage of the

0:22:20.320 --> 0:22:25.840
<v Speaker 5>Inflation Reduction Act, which Congress has now partly revoked. One

0:22:25.880 --> 0:22:29.600
<v Speaker 5>of the big problems is loss of staff, loss of expertise,

0:22:29.760 --> 0:22:33.640
<v Speaker 5>loss of scientific capability. That'll take some time to rebuild.

0:22:33.880 --> 0:22:37.240
<v Speaker 5>So the legal issues most of us can be restored,

0:22:37.800 --> 0:22:41.359
<v Speaker 5>but actually regaining the momentum is going to take time.

0:22:41.640 --> 0:22:43.840
<v Speaker 5>We will have lost a lot of time that we

0:22:43.920 --> 0:22:44.360
<v Speaker 5>don't have.

0:22:45.000 --> 0:22:48.520
<v Speaker 1>What can environmental activists do is it file suits to

0:22:48.600 --> 0:22:51.160
<v Speaker 1>try to slow down the Trump administration.

0:22:51.680 --> 0:22:54.080
<v Speaker 5>Yes, and there's already a lot of that, and quite

0:22:54.080 --> 0:22:57.800
<v Speaker 5>a few of those lossits have had early successes in

0:22:57.840 --> 0:23:00.480
<v Speaker 5>the district court, serve in quite a few preliminary injunctions

0:23:00.520 --> 0:23:04.280
<v Speaker 5>granted against what the Trump administration is doing. And those

0:23:04.480 --> 0:23:07.879
<v Speaker 5>states that still care about climate change are doing a

0:23:07.880 --> 0:23:11.960
<v Speaker 5>lot in New York, California, Massachusetts, Washington, Illinois, several other

0:23:12.000 --> 0:23:16.359
<v Speaker 5>states are acting on their own to reduce their emissions.

0:23:16.760 --> 0:23:18.600
<v Speaker 5>But I think the most important thing that needs to

0:23:18.640 --> 0:23:21.760
<v Speaker 5>be done is is that nepolling place is to elect

0:23:21.840 --> 0:23:25.640
<v Speaker 5>officials at every level, federal, state, and local, who really

0:23:25.680 --> 0:23:27.440
<v Speaker 5>are going to act on climate change.

0:23:27.720 --> 0:23:32.840
<v Speaker 1>I mean, how do climate deniers even support their position?

0:23:33.480 --> 0:23:37.000
<v Speaker 5>Yeah, I mean there's a small handful of climate deniers

0:23:37.080 --> 0:23:39.280
<v Speaker 5>or climate not so batters, as I call them, are

0:23:39.280 --> 0:23:42.120
<v Speaker 5>out there, several of whom have just been hired by

0:23:42.160 --> 0:23:46.359
<v Speaker 5>the federal government to advise them. They're complete outliers in

0:23:46.400 --> 0:23:48.440
<v Speaker 5>the scientific community, but there are a few of those

0:23:48.480 --> 0:23:51.600
<v Speaker 5>out there, and there are some news media outlets that

0:23:51.680 --> 0:23:54.960
<v Speaker 5>put that out. Nobody has the nerve. No lawyer goes

0:23:55.000 --> 0:23:58.520
<v Speaker 5>to court denying climate change. They know that that would

0:23:58.520 --> 0:24:01.040
<v Speaker 5>be a real loser, but we still see that in

0:24:01.240 --> 0:24:04.240
<v Speaker 5>the political arena and in some media outlets.

0:24:04.520 --> 0:24:07.840
<v Speaker 1>Thanks so much. That's Michael Gerard, director of Columbia Law

0:24:07.840 --> 0:24:11.919
<v Speaker 1>school Saban Center for Climate Change Law. And that's it

0:24:12.000 --> 0:24:14.560
<v Speaker 1>for this edition of The Bloomberg Law Show. Remember you

0:24:14.600 --> 0:24:17.080
<v Speaker 1>can always get the latest legal news on our Bloomberg

0:24:17.160 --> 0:24:20.800
<v Speaker 1>Law podcasts. You can find them on Apple Podcasts, Spotify,

0:24:20.960 --> 0:24:26.000
<v Speaker 1>and at www dot Bloomberg dot com, slash podcast, Slash Law,

0:24:26.400 --> 0:24:29.000
<v Speaker 1>and remember to tune into The Bloomberg Law Show every

0:24:29.040 --> 0:24:32.960
<v Speaker 1>weeknight at ten pm Wall Street Time. I'm June Grosso

0:24:33.080 --> 0:24:34.679
<v Speaker 1>and you're listening to Bloomberg