1
00:00:02,759 --> 00:00:07,000
Speaker 1: This is Bloomberg Law with June Grossel from Bloomberg Radio.

2
00:00:08,760 --> 00:00:12,080
Speaker 1: Attorney General Pam Bondi used to say that the Jeffrey

3
00:00:12,119 --> 00:00:14,800
Speaker 1: Epstein files would be released.

4
00:00:15,120 --> 00:00:18,360
Speaker 2: You know, tens of thousands of pages of documents and

5
00:00:18,560 --> 00:00:24,280
Speaker 2: hundreds and hundreds of victims of Jeffrey Epstein. So the

6
00:00:24,360 --> 00:00:28,120
Speaker 2: FBI they have been working round the clock at my directive,

7
00:00:28,160 --> 00:00:31,120
Speaker 2: at Kashptel's directive. Now Dan Bongino's there.

8
00:00:30,960 --> 00:00:34,159
Speaker 3: Who is a great asset for all of us at

9
00:00:34,200 --> 00:00:37,000
Speaker 3: the FBI as well. But yeah, we have to protect

10
00:00:37,040 --> 00:00:41,159
Speaker 3: their identity, their personal information to make sure they're safe.

11
00:00:41,360 --> 00:00:44,640
Speaker 3: But other than that, we are releasing all of these

12
00:00:44,680 --> 00:00:47,200
Speaker 3: documents as soon as we can get them redacted.

13
00:00:47,760 --> 00:00:51,280
Speaker 1: That was Bondi on Fox in March. Now the question

14
00:00:51,479 --> 00:00:55,280
Speaker 1: is whether even a congressional subpoena will make the Attorney

15
00:00:55,320 --> 00:00:58,760
Speaker 1: General release the files, particularly in light of a Wall

16
00:00:58,800 --> 00:01:03,360
Speaker 1: Street Journal report that Bondi toll President Trump. His name

17
00:01:03,400 --> 00:01:07,319
Speaker 1: appears multiple times in the finals. As pressure on the

18
00:01:07,360 --> 00:01:12,399
Speaker 1: administration to release the Epstein files grows, the Justice Department

19
00:01:12,520 --> 00:01:16,920
Speaker 1: is taking a detour, apparently casting itself as searching for

20
00:01:16,959 --> 00:01:21,680
Speaker 1: more information on the Epstein case, with Deputy Attorney General

21
00:01:21,800 --> 00:01:26,959
Speaker 1: Todd Blanche meeting today with Glaine Maxwell, Jeffrey Epstein's former

22
00:01:27,040 --> 00:01:31,520
Speaker 1: girlfriend who's serving a twenty year sentence in Florida. Joining

23
00:01:31,520 --> 00:01:35,120
Speaker 1: me is Dave Ehrenberg, former Palm Beach County State Attorney.

24
00:01:35,760 --> 00:01:40,320
Speaker 1: Dave the number two person at the Justice Department, Todd Blanche,

25
00:01:40,800 --> 00:01:44,880
Speaker 1: Trump's former criminal defense attorney, is meeting with a convicted

26
00:01:45,000 --> 00:01:51,000
Speaker 1: sex trafficker, Gallaine Maxwell, that the Justice Department successfully prosecuted,

27
00:01:51,480 --> 00:01:54,880
Speaker 1: and it comes as she's appealing her twenty twenty one conviction.

28
00:01:55,840 --> 00:01:57,360
Speaker 1: How odd is this?

29
00:01:58,520 --> 00:02:03,920
Speaker 4: It's extremely odd because generally the number two person at

30
00:02:03,960 --> 00:02:09,720
Speaker 4: the deparminative Justice doesn't conduct interviews with potential witnesses, especially

31
00:02:10,120 --> 00:02:15,240
Speaker 4: those who have already been convicted by their department of

32
00:02:15,280 --> 00:02:17,520
Speaker 4: such a serious crime. I mean, why would you ever

33
00:02:17,520 --> 00:02:20,160
Speaker 4: believe anything this woman says. He's not only a convicted

34
00:02:20,400 --> 00:02:24,360
Speaker 4: human trafficker, but she's also a liar. She was indicted

35
00:02:24,480 --> 00:02:28,919
Speaker 4: for perjury back in twenty twenty and she is someone

36
00:02:28,960 --> 00:02:32,760
Speaker 4: who is untrustworthy. But both sides want something here. She

37
00:02:33,160 --> 00:02:36,920
Speaker 4: meaning Glen Maxwell, wants a pardon from the President who's

38
00:02:37,000 --> 00:02:42,359
Speaker 4: very transactional, and President Trump wants her to exonerate him

39
00:02:42,360 --> 00:02:44,679
Speaker 4: to say that Trump had nothing to do with any

40
00:02:44,720 --> 00:02:48,119
Speaker 4: of the crimes. Now, I personally believe that Trump had

41
00:02:48,120 --> 00:02:50,959
Speaker 4: nothing to do with any of the crimes. But there's

42
00:02:50,960 --> 00:02:54,320
Speaker 4: a lot of smoke here because of Trump's name being

43
00:02:54,360 --> 00:02:56,920
Speaker 4: in the Epstein files. And you know what they say,

44
00:02:56,960 --> 00:02:59,000
Speaker 4: it's not the crime but the cover up. And the

45
00:02:59,120 --> 00:03:02,000
Speaker 4: cover up here is to prevent the release of these

46
00:03:02,040 --> 00:03:04,840
Speaker 4: files when you promised it over and over again to

47
00:03:04,919 --> 00:03:07,800
Speaker 4: your supporters. So, yes, this whole thing is extraordinary. Not

48
00:03:07,840 --> 00:03:10,040
Speaker 4: the lease of which is that the number two person

49
00:03:10,080 --> 00:03:12,799
Speaker 4: of the Department of Justice doesn't get on a plane

50
00:03:13,200 --> 00:03:15,959
Speaker 4: and get a briefcase in a notepad and start acting

51
00:03:16,080 --> 00:03:17,480
Speaker 4: like a line prosecutor.

52
00:03:18,040 --> 00:03:21,000
Speaker 1: Bland said he wants to know if Glaine Maxwell has

53
00:03:21,040 --> 00:03:25,280
Speaker 1: information about anyone who has committed crimes against victims. But

54
00:03:25,680 --> 00:03:28,880
Speaker 1: the Attorney General, Pam Bondi, has said that nothing in

55
00:03:28,919 --> 00:03:34,240
Speaker 1: the files warranted further investigation or prosecution. So what's going on?

56
00:03:35,040 --> 00:03:39,560
Speaker 4: This is about CYA. It's to protect Donald Trump. This

57
00:03:39,720 --> 00:03:43,440
Speaker 4: is to protect him because his name is in the files. Now,

58
00:03:43,960 --> 00:03:46,800
Speaker 4: his supporters were led to believe that anyone whose names

59
00:03:46,800 --> 00:03:48,840
Speaker 4: in the files must have committed some crimes. They were

60
00:03:48,880 --> 00:03:50,400
Speaker 4: led to believe that the number one name in the

61
00:03:50,400 --> 00:03:52,880
Speaker 4: file would be Bill Clinton, filed by Bill Gates and

62
00:03:52,920 --> 00:03:55,360
Speaker 4: then every other prominent Democrat. Of course, they were lied to,

63
00:03:56,000 --> 00:03:58,440
Speaker 4: they were made to look like fools. I mean, these

64
00:03:58,520 --> 00:04:03,480
Speaker 4: folks thrive on conspiracy theories and now they're outraged and

65
00:04:03,520 --> 00:04:06,480
Speaker 4: they're ready to revolt. So the administration is trying to

66
00:04:06,600 --> 00:04:09,560
Speaker 4: placate them further by saying, see, we'll get more information

67
00:04:09,720 --> 00:04:14,240
Speaker 4: from this disgraced, convicted human trafficker. Well, what makes you

68
00:04:14,240 --> 00:04:16,640
Speaker 4: think she'll be telling the truth? She has every incentive

69
00:04:16,680 --> 00:04:20,240
Speaker 4: to lie. She's lie before, she will lie again. Anything

70
00:04:20,279 --> 00:04:23,159
Speaker 4: that she says should be corroborated. And then if she

71
00:04:23,200 --> 00:04:25,760
Speaker 4: says something to Todd blanche who was President of Trump's

72
00:04:26,120 --> 00:04:29,800
Speaker 4: former defense lawyer, his personal defense lawyer, what makes you

73
00:04:29,839 --> 00:04:31,720
Speaker 4: think will make its way to the public if it

74
00:04:31,800 --> 00:04:35,559
Speaker 4: at all implicates Donald Trump. So this is not how

75
00:04:36,040 --> 00:04:39,960
Speaker 4: an investigation should be done. And if the administration wanted

76
00:04:40,000 --> 00:04:43,640
Speaker 4: full transparency, they should just release the file subject to

77
00:04:43,800 --> 00:04:47,560
Speaker 4: court orders and other privacy concerns involving the victims, and

78
00:04:48,040 --> 00:04:51,479
Speaker 4: then I think people would start to move on from

79
00:04:51,480 --> 00:04:55,359
Speaker 4: this story. But until that happens, this story ain't going away.

80
00:04:55,400 --> 00:04:58,560
Speaker 1: Did you think that she's talking to Blanche. If she

81
00:04:58,680 --> 00:05:00,719
Speaker 1: is talking to Blanche, do you think that she's talking

82
00:05:00,720 --> 00:05:03,240
Speaker 1: to him under some kind of agreement like queen for

83
00:05:03,320 --> 00:05:06,000
Speaker 1: a day where nothing you say is going to be

84
00:05:06,080 --> 00:05:06,920
Speaker 1: used against you.

85
00:05:08,000 --> 00:05:11,120
Speaker 4: Her lawyers would never allow her to talk to a prosecutor,

86
00:05:11,160 --> 00:05:13,640
Speaker 4: even if it's the number two person at the Department

87
00:05:13,680 --> 00:05:16,280
Speaker 4: of Justice and not aligned prosecutor. They would never let

88
00:05:16,279 --> 00:05:19,280
Speaker 4: her talk to anyone without a guarantee that she has

89
00:05:19,360 --> 00:05:22,320
Speaker 4: immunity for at least those comments on that day. So

90
00:05:22,600 --> 00:05:25,880
Speaker 4: some call it a Queen for the day. But she's

91
00:05:26,080 --> 00:05:32,320
Speaker 4: not going to jeopardize her appeal and her potential because

92
00:05:32,320 --> 00:05:34,919
Speaker 4: she has an appeal pending if she is retried. She

93
00:05:34,960 --> 00:05:37,280
Speaker 4: doesn't want this information to come back and haunt her.

94
00:05:37,320 --> 00:05:40,000
Speaker 4: So she wants something out of Donald Trump. She wants

95
00:05:40,000 --> 00:05:43,520
Speaker 4: a pardon, and she's probably going to be willing to

96
00:05:43,520 --> 00:05:46,240
Speaker 4: say anything to get it, but she doesn't want it

97
00:05:46,279 --> 00:05:48,880
Speaker 4: to come back at her in a future trial. So yes,

98
00:05:49,120 --> 00:05:51,640
Speaker 4: she will get some sort of immunity before she speaks

99
00:05:51,640 --> 00:05:54,360
Speaker 4: to Todd Blash. Now she goes before Congress, that too

100
00:05:54,400 --> 00:05:56,839
Speaker 4: will require immunity because her lawyers, I would think, would

101
00:05:56,880 --> 00:05:59,039
Speaker 4: have the same issue They don't want her to implicate

102
00:05:59,040 --> 00:06:01,120
Speaker 4: herself any more than she already has.

103
00:06:01,520 --> 00:06:04,560
Speaker 1: Her brother told The New York Post that she's compiling

104
00:06:04,680 --> 00:06:10,000
Speaker 1: new evidence pretending to allege government misconduct stemming from her trial,

105
00:06:10,120 --> 00:06:12,760
Speaker 1: to hand over to the Justice Department.

106
00:06:13,400 --> 00:06:18,280
Speaker 4: Every criminal defendant believes that there's government misconduct for their case,

107
00:06:18,360 --> 00:06:22,040
Speaker 4: especially if you're convicted. So yeah, she's going to compile

108
00:06:22,160 --> 00:06:25,480
Speaker 4: her evidence. Meanwhile, she had any real evidence that could

109
00:06:25,520 --> 00:06:28,400
Speaker 4: be of use to the government to release the victims

110
00:06:28,400 --> 00:06:30,560
Speaker 4: and to the public, she would have done so already

111
00:06:30,600 --> 00:06:32,800
Speaker 4: because now she's facing twenty years in prison. She's not

112
00:06:32,839 --> 00:06:35,440
Speaker 4: getting out until she's seventy five years old at the earliest.

113
00:06:36,240 --> 00:06:39,839
Speaker 4: And so if she didn't have the goods back then,

114
00:06:40,279 --> 00:06:42,479
Speaker 4: why would we believe she has the goods now. I

115
00:06:42,480 --> 00:06:45,120
Speaker 4: think there's a desperate woman who was willing to say anything.

116
00:06:45,760 --> 00:06:48,600
Speaker 4: She'll do anything for a pardon. She does not want

117
00:06:48,600 --> 00:06:53,400
Speaker 4: to spend her next decade or so behind bars. She's

118
00:06:53,400 --> 00:06:56,760
Speaker 4: not used to this lifestyle. She's used to the high life,

119
00:06:56,800 --> 00:07:00,440
Speaker 4: life of privilege, life of prestige, and now she's the

120
00:07:00,480 --> 00:07:03,239
Speaker 4: only one being locked up for the whole Jeffrey Epstein

121
00:07:03,600 --> 00:07:05,480
Speaker 4: saga because Jeffrey Epstein killed himself.

122
00:07:06,640 --> 00:07:12,600
Speaker 1: Dave about the congressional subpoena. The House Overside Chair Republican

123
00:07:12,720 --> 00:07:16,480
Speaker 1: James Comer has subpoenaed Maxwell for a deposition. In what

124
00:07:16,560 --> 00:07:20,720
Speaker 1: circumstances would her lawyer allow her to testify? How would

125
00:07:20,800 --> 00:07:23,600
Speaker 1: that kind of testimony help her at all?

126
00:07:24,760 --> 00:07:28,760
Speaker 4: It will help her if she publicly exonerates President Trump.

127
00:07:29,040 --> 00:07:31,600
Speaker 4: It will help her get a pardon. That's what she's

128
00:07:31,640 --> 00:07:35,560
Speaker 4: aiming for. She wants either a pardon a commutation. She

129
00:07:35,720 --> 00:07:38,560
Speaker 4: wants the Department of Justice to not retry the case

130
00:07:38,600 --> 00:07:40,720
Speaker 4: if she wins on her appeal, which is going before

131
00:07:40,720 --> 00:07:43,440
Speaker 4: the Supreme Court. So there are things that Trump can

132
00:07:43,480 --> 00:07:46,240
Speaker 4: offer her, and that's why she'll be doing this. Otherwise,

133
00:07:46,240 --> 00:07:47,920
Speaker 4: there's no reason for her to be doing this. I mean,

134
00:07:48,440 --> 00:07:53,000
Speaker 4: she's a convicted human trafficker, she's a proven liar. She's

135
00:07:53,040 --> 00:07:57,960
Speaker 4: a criminal. And for the Magabase, which thinks that Jeffrey

136
00:07:57,960 --> 00:08:01,040
Speaker 4: Epstein is Satan himself, to me how they're willing to

137
00:08:01,400 --> 00:08:04,800
Speaker 4: roll out the red carpet for Satan's accomplice.

138
00:08:05,400 --> 00:08:09,400
Speaker 1: The House Oversight sub Committee voted Wednesday to subpoena the

139
00:08:09,480 --> 00:08:14,080
Speaker 1: DOJ for the Epstein files. And they're not only looking

140
00:08:14,080 --> 00:08:18,560
Speaker 1: for the files, but also communications between former Biden officials

141
00:08:19,120 --> 00:08:24,360
Speaker 1: and the Justice Department related to the Epstein matter. Well,

142
00:08:24,400 --> 00:08:27,600
Speaker 1: the Justice Department hand them over, especially now that the

143
00:08:27,640 --> 00:08:32,360
Speaker 1: Wall Street Journal has reported that Bondie and Blanche informed

144
00:08:32,360 --> 00:08:36,520
Speaker 1: the President in May that his name appears multiple times

145
00:08:36,559 --> 00:08:37,840
Speaker 1: in the Epstein files.

146
00:08:38,720 --> 00:08:42,640
Speaker 4: Oh, the Department of Justice is not giving Congress anything

147
00:08:42,760 --> 00:08:45,679
Speaker 4: with Donald Trump's name in it. So if they give

148
00:08:45,760 --> 00:08:48,040
Speaker 4: up the Epstein file, maybe will be a redacted version

149
00:08:48,040 --> 00:08:50,240
Speaker 4: of it. But they're not going to do anything to

150
00:08:50,280 --> 00:08:53,000
Speaker 4: harm the Boss. I mean, that's why the folks are

151
00:08:53,040 --> 00:08:55,560
Speaker 4: there to begin with. That's why Donald Trump put his

152
00:08:55,640 --> 00:08:59,280
Speaker 4: two defense lawyers at top positions at the Department of Justice.

153
00:08:59,280 --> 00:09:01,600
Speaker 4: That's why I picked the loyalists like Pam Bondi to

154
00:09:01,600 --> 00:09:05,120
Speaker 4: be Attorney General. He doesn't want this thing to get

155
00:09:05,160 --> 00:09:07,480
Speaker 4: out of hand and get a mind of its own.

156
00:09:07,520 --> 00:09:09,840
Speaker 4: That's why he's not going to appoint a special counsel.

157
00:09:10,240 --> 00:09:12,800
Speaker 4: People said, we should have a special counsel. Yeah, well,

158
00:09:12,880 --> 00:09:15,240
Speaker 4: I remember Bill Clinton had a special counsel. You remember

159
00:09:15,280 --> 00:09:19,480
Speaker 4: Janerino stepped aside and had Kenneth Starr investigate Whitewater. Well,

160
00:09:19,559 --> 00:09:23,240
Speaker 4: the investigation in Whitewater became an investigation into Monica Lewinsky

161
00:09:23,280 --> 00:09:26,319
Speaker 4: and led to Bill Clinton's impeachment. Donald Trump doesn't want

162
00:09:26,320 --> 00:09:28,240
Speaker 4: to go down that road. He wants to button this

163
00:09:28,240 --> 00:09:31,600
Speaker 4: thing up. But the irony is in his attempt to

164
00:09:31,679 --> 00:09:35,480
Speaker 4: cut this off at its knees, he has prolonged the agony.

165
00:09:36,120 --> 00:09:38,040
Speaker 4: It's not the crime, it's the cover up. And it

166
00:09:38,040 --> 00:09:39,679
Speaker 4: looks like there's been a cover up here, at least

167
00:09:39,679 --> 00:09:42,040
Speaker 4: the many in the public, which is why people are

168
00:09:42,040 --> 00:09:42,960
Speaker 4: still talking about this.

169
00:09:43,640 --> 00:09:47,640
Speaker 1: Does Congress have any levers to pull to force the

170
00:09:47,760 --> 00:09:48,840
Speaker 1: Justice Department on this?

171
00:09:49,600 --> 00:09:52,720
Speaker 4: They can subpoena the documents and then go to court,

172
00:09:52,760 --> 00:09:55,280
Speaker 4: but you really think the Republicans in Congress are going

173
00:09:55,320 --> 00:09:57,680
Speaker 4: to go to court to fight the Republicans and the

174
00:09:57,760 --> 00:10:01,160
Speaker 4: executive branch. One thing we've learned from this is that

175
00:10:01,240 --> 00:10:04,360
Speaker 4: when the going gets tough, they roll over, They turn

176
00:10:04,440 --> 00:10:08,360
Speaker 4: tail and run away. This Congress has a masculated itself

177
00:10:08,640 --> 00:10:11,360
Speaker 4: to the executive branch. And I know they're starting to

178
00:10:11,360 --> 00:10:14,839
Speaker 4: sense penisn't ask questions about this because their base demands it.

179
00:10:14,880 --> 00:10:16,880
Speaker 4: Both They'll only go so far. Donald Trump is the

180
00:10:16,960 --> 00:10:19,800
Speaker 4: leader of their party, and when Donald Trump wants something

181
00:10:20,000 --> 00:10:21,720
Speaker 4: badly enough, he gets it.

182
00:10:22,000 --> 00:10:25,440
Speaker 1: Coming up next, why a Florida judge decided not to

183
00:10:25,480 --> 00:10:28,800
Speaker 1: release the transcripts. This is Bloomberg. I've been talking to

184
00:10:28,880 --> 00:10:32,320
Speaker 1: Dave Ehrenberg, former Palm Beach County state attorney, about the

185
00:10:32,320 --> 00:10:36,680
Speaker 1: pressure on the Trump administration to release the Jeffrey Epstein files.

186
00:10:37,480 --> 00:10:40,480
Speaker 1: Let's talk about the grand jury transcripts first. You can

187
00:10:40,520 --> 00:10:45,360
Speaker 1: explain why the transcripts will not reveal client lists or

188
00:10:45,400 --> 00:10:49,360
Speaker 1: any of the other things that the conspiracy theorists are

189
00:10:49,400 --> 00:10:50,040
Speaker 1: looking for.

190
00:10:50,960 --> 00:10:54,680
Speaker 4: The grand jury transcripts are just a portion of the

191
00:10:54,679 --> 00:10:57,400
Speaker 4: portion of what people are looking for. See what they

192
00:10:57,400 --> 00:10:59,559
Speaker 4: wanted the Epstein files. They want the names of these

193
00:10:59,559 --> 00:11:02,960
Speaker 4: third parts parties who allegedly were involved with human trafficking.

194
00:11:03,040 --> 00:11:07,120
Speaker 4: Who were these girls trafficked too, That's what people are seeking.

195
00:11:07,600 --> 00:11:10,680
Speaker 4: That's not going to be in the grand jury transcripts,

196
00:11:10,920 --> 00:11:13,040
Speaker 4: especially redacted once. It's not going to be in there.

197
00:11:13,600 --> 00:11:16,440
Speaker 4: So it's pretty much a distraction that the administration is

198
00:11:16,480 --> 00:11:18,960
Speaker 4: just seeking these grand jury transcripts and we come on.

199
00:11:19,280 --> 00:11:21,160
Speaker 4: First of all, they're not going to get him. The

200
00:11:21,280 --> 00:11:23,880
Speaker 4: judges will reject it, and then they can blame the judiciary,

201
00:11:23,880 --> 00:11:26,000
Speaker 4: which is part of the strategy because if there's one

202
00:11:26,040 --> 00:11:28,720
Speaker 4: group that the MAGA world hates more than the media,

203
00:11:28,800 --> 00:11:31,960
Speaker 4: it's the judiciary. It's judges. So that was actually a

204
00:11:32,000 --> 00:11:34,120
Speaker 4: smart move I thought by Trump to put the focus

205
00:11:34,120 --> 00:11:35,640
Speaker 4: on the judges. But it's still not going to work.

206
00:11:35,679 --> 00:11:38,520
Speaker 4: It's not going to satisfy the MAGA base who've been

207
00:11:38,760 --> 00:11:41,559
Speaker 4: led to believe there's this client list and that you

208
00:11:41,720 --> 00:11:46,120
Speaker 4: have this democratic conspiracy to have a child sex trafficking green. Well,

209
00:11:46,320 --> 00:11:48,120
Speaker 4: it's a different role when you go from being a

210
00:11:48,120 --> 00:11:50,360
Speaker 4: blogger to being in government. When you're in government, you

211
00:11:50,400 --> 00:11:52,720
Speaker 4: got to produce. When you're a blogger, you can say

212
00:11:52,720 --> 00:11:55,720
Speaker 4: whatever you want and never be held accountable for it.

213
00:11:55,760 --> 00:11:58,160
Speaker 4: And that's a lesson that Caspitel and Dan Begino and

214
00:11:58,160 --> 00:11:58,880
Speaker 4: others are learning.

215
00:11:59,200 --> 00:12:02,440
Speaker 1: The Florida said judge has already declined to release the

216
00:12:02,480 --> 00:12:04,800
Speaker 1: transcripts on what grounds.

217
00:12:05,000 --> 00:12:07,720
Speaker 4: There are grand jury secrecy rules and you can't get

218
00:12:07,800 --> 00:12:12,600
Speaker 4: the grand jury transcripts unless you have an exception under

219
00:12:13,000 --> 00:12:15,800
Speaker 4: the federal law, and there's no exception here just because

220
00:12:15,800 --> 00:12:18,600
Speaker 4: the public wants to see it. Also, you need to

221
00:12:18,640 --> 00:12:21,199
Speaker 4: go to victims and get their permission and approvals, but

222
00:12:21,280 --> 00:12:23,480
Speaker 4: the administration didn't do that. They just went right to

223
00:12:23,480 --> 00:12:25,240
Speaker 4: the judge because it was about the show. It wasn't

224
00:12:25,240 --> 00:12:27,480
Speaker 4: about to go. It was about the show. They wanted

225
00:12:27,480 --> 00:12:30,640
Speaker 4: the public to think that they were doing something about transparency.

226
00:12:30,720 --> 00:12:33,400
Speaker 4: But the judge rule, as we all expected, the judge

227
00:12:33,400 --> 00:12:36,280
Speaker 4: the rule. But even if the judge did produce these

228
00:12:36,520 --> 00:12:39,400
Speaker 4: grand jury transcripts, I mean, it's really, as I said,

229
00:12:39,440 --> 00:12:42,400
Speaker 4: just a portion of what the public wants. The public

230
00:12:42,440 --> 00:12:46,120
Speaker 4: wants names. Grand jury transcripts wouldn't produce those names of

231
00:12:46,200 --> 00:12:49,680
Speaker 4: third parties. It would just be the testimony that was

232
00:12:49,720 --> 00:12:53,200
Speaker 4: written down and the exhibits that were provided inside the

233
00:12:53,200 --> 00:12:57,319
Speaker 4: secret grand jury that led to Epstein's indictment. It's not

234
00:12:57,360 --> 00:13:03,160
Speaker 4: going to be what implicates uncharged third parties. And so

235
00:13:03,400 --> 00:13:06,559
Speaker 4: if you are waiting for the grand jury transcripts to

236
00:13:06,640 --> 00:13:10,040
Speaker 4: answer your at Jeffrey Epstein questions, you'll be waiting a

237
00:13:10,080 --> 00:13:10,720
Speaker 4: long time.

238
00:13:11,880 --> 00:13:15,520
Speaker 1: There are still two judges in New York considering the

239
00:13:15,520 --> 00:13:19,520
Speaker 1: government's requests to release the grand jury transcripts in the

240
00:13:19,520 --> 00:13:24,679
Speaker 1: Epstein and Maxwell cases. They're taking more time and requesting

241
00:13:24,720 --> 00:13:28,400
Speaker 1: more information. What do you think they're just not, you know,

242
00:13:28,480 --> 00:13:31,479
Speaker 1: denying them out of hand and saying grand jury secrecy.

243
00:13:32,720 --> 00:13:36,120
Speaker 4: The rules up there in that circuit in New York

244
00:13:36,280 --> 00:13:41,079
Speaker 4: are a little better for the public to get access

245
00:13:41,240 --> 00:13:44,920
Speaker 4: to grand jury transcripts. There's there's a slight opening. It's

246
00:13:44,960 --> 00:13:48,640
Speaker 4: not impossible. It's hard, but it's not impossible. So there's

247
00:13:48,679 --> 00:13:50,880
Speaker 4: an outside chance that could happen up there. But as

248
00:13:50,920 --> 00:13:54,240
Speaker 4: I said, even if you get them, they're going to

249
00:13:54,240 --> 00:13:56,560
Speaker 4: be disappointing. They're going to be largely a nothing burger

250
00:13:56,600 --> 00:14:00,720
Speaker 4: of people, and it probably suits Trump more if the

251
00:14:00,800 --> 00:14:03,840
Speaker 4: judges just reject the request, then Trump can say, see,

252
00:14:03,840 --> 00:14:07,319
Speaker 4: I tried, I try to be transparent. Blame those unelected

253
00:14:07,600 --> 00:14:09,880
Speaker 4: liberal judges, even though he may have appointed some of them.

254
00:14:09,880 --> 00:14:13,240
Speaker 4: But you can just blame the people wearing the black

255
00:14:13,280 --> 00:14:15,760
Speaker 4: ropes who get lifetime appointments and carry the gabble. Much

256
00:14:15,800 --> 00:14:19,560
Speaker 4: easier to do than to turn and shine the flashlight

257
00:14:19,600 --> 00:14:20,120
Speaker 4: on yourself.

258
00:14:20,680 --> 00:14:23,640
Speaker 1: And I want to get your reaction to the Trump

259
00:14:23,680 --> 00:14:31,080
Speaker 1: administration falsely claiming that President Obama deliberately manufactured and politicized

260
00:14:31,120 --> 00:14:35,640
Speaker 1: intelligence reports about Russian interference in the twenty sixteen election.

261
00:14:36,040 --> 00:14:37,840
Speaker 1: I don't know how we got back to this point.

262
00:14:38,280 --> 00:14:39,400
Speaker 1: Do you know what this is about?

263
00:14:39,760 --> 00:14:42,840
Speaker 4: Yeah, it's about distraction. It's to take your mind off

264
00:14:42,880 --> 00:14:47,560
Speaker 4: of the Jeffrey Epstein situation. So he has Pulsey Gabbert,

265
00:14:47,600 --> 00:14:50,600
Speaker 4: who has no business being in government. Quite frankly, she's

266
00:14:50,600 --> 00:14:52,920
Speaker 4: a hack. She's not qualified to be the director of

267
00:14:53,000 --> 00:14:56,000
Speaker 4: D and I, and she's doing Pulsy Gabbert things by

268
00:14:56,960 --> 00:15:00,880
Speaker 4: creating a story out of nothing. Even what she produced

269
00:15:01,320 --> 00:15:04,800
Speaker 4: doesn't show what she says it shows. All shows is

270
00:15:04,800 --> 00:15:09,120
Speaker 4: that Russia did not manipulate votes. They did not change

271
00:15:09,120 --> 00:15:12,000
Speaker 4: the outcome of the election by the voting. But they did,

272
00:15:12,080 --> 00:15:15,160
Speaker 4: and it's been proven over and over again, even by

273
00:15:15,280 --> 00:15:18,680
Speaker 4: the report by Senator Marco Rubio's Senate Intelligence Committee that

274
00:15:18,760 --> 00:15:21,320
Speaker 4: Russia did interfere with the election. They had a favorite

275
00:15:21,320 --> 00:15:25,000
Speaker 4: in the election, Donald Trump, and they had a strategy

276
00:15:25,040 --> 00:15:30,360
Speaker 4: that they implemented to get involved through spreading disinformation. But

277
00:15:30,400 --> 00:15:32,560
Speaker 4: they didn't hack into voting machines. So I don't know

278
00:15:32,600 --> 00:15:35,400
Speaker 4: what this thing is about that Tulsa Gabbert is trying

279
00:15:35,440 --> 00:15:38,760
Speaker 4: to show, except it's nothing except for a distraction on

280
00:15:38,800 --> 00:15:42,800
Speaker 4: the Jeffrey Epstein matter and approves why Tulsa Gabbard is

281
00:15:43,120 --> 00:15:44,200
Speaker 4: unfit for office.

282
00:15:44,520 --> 00:15:49,600
Speaker 1: Obama spokesman said these bizarre allegations are ridiculous and a

283
00:15:49,640 --> 00:15:52,840
Speaker 1: weak attempt at distraction. I mean, this is not the

284
00:15:52,880 --> 00:15:55,320
Speaker 1: first time that Trump has attacked Obama.

285
00:15:55,920 --> 00:15:58,800
Speaker 4: Well, that's how he built his political career by claiming

286
00:15:58,840 --> 00:16:02,680
Speaker 4: that Obama born in Kenya. This is why the magabase

287
00:16:02,840 --> 00:16:06,840
Speaker 4: is so upset about this latest conspiracy theory, because they

288
00:16:07,080 --> 00:16:11,000
Speaker 4: were led to believe that there are conspiracies under every

289
00:16:11,680 --> 00:16:15,880
Speaker 4: mattress in DC, whether it's Obama being from Kenya, or

290
00:16:15,920 --> 00:16:18,440
Speaker 4: the election of twenty twenty being stolen, or Jeffrey Epstein

291
00:16:18,680 --> 00:16:21,520
Speaker 4: being part of a Democrat at cabal. But as the

292
00:16:22,080 --> 00:16:26,960
Speaker 4: conspiracy theories get destroyed, the magabases is starting to wonder

293
00:16:27,080 --> 00:16:31,600
Speaker 4: if they've been misled, if they've been made to look

294
00:16:31,680 --> 00:16:37,000
Speaker 4: like fools, And they're understandably point their finger at their

295
00:16:37,040 --> 00:16:39,920
Speaker 4: own team because their own team is the one who

296
00:16:39,960 --> 00:16:40,800
Speaker 4: has led them astray.

297
00:16:41,560 --> 00:16:44,360
Speaker 1: Turning to other legal news, one of the world's most

298
00:16:44,560 --> 00:16:48,560
Speaker 1: vulnerable countries to the fallout from climate change has won

299
00:16:48,600 --> 00:16:52,920
Speaker 1: a landmark legal battle, giving countries new ammunition to pursue

300
00:16:52,960 --> 00:16:57,040
Speaker 1: some of the planet's biggest emitters. Joining me is environmental

301
00:16:57,120 --> 00:17:01,360
Speaker 1: law expert Michael Girard, director of Columbia Law schools Saban

302
00:17:01,480 --> 00:17:05,400
Speaker 1: Center for Climate Change Law, tell us about this decision

303
00:17:05,480 --> 00:17:07,840
Speaker 1: by the International Court of Justice.

304
00:17:08,320 --> 00:17:11,879
Speaker 5: So the International Court of Justice just issued a unanimous

305
00:17:11,880 --> 00:17:16,320
Speaker 5: opinion by all fourteen of its judges on climate change.

306
00:17:16,640 --> 00:17:20,120
Speaker 5: The decision said that climate change is a grave threat

307
00:17:20,200 --> 00:17:25,879
Speaker 5: to humankind and many elements of international law require every

308
00:17:25,920 --> 00:17:29,920
Speaker 5: country to act very strongly to try to fight climate change.

309
00:17:30,119 --> 00:17:32,240
Speaker 1: And tell us about the case that was brought to

310
00:17:32,440 --> 00:17:33,359
Speaker 1: years ago by.

311
00:17:33,280 --> 00:17:37,200
Speaker 5: Vanuatu vano Watu, which is one of the small island

312
00:17:37,280 --> 00:17:41,280
Speaker 5: nations in the Pacific that is really endangered by subl rise,

313
00:17:41,359 --> 00:17:46,159
Speaker 5: who was able to organize an international effort and persuade

314
00:17:46,160 --> 00:17:50,680
Speaker 5: the UN General Assembly to send to the International Court

315
00:17:50,720 --> 00:17:53,879
Speaker 5: of Justice in the Hague questions about what are the

316
00:17:53,920 --> 00:17:59,399
Speaker 5: obligations of countries to reduce their greenhouse assmentions and among

317
00:17:59,440 --> 00:18:03,480
Speaker 5: other things, to save small island states and everybody else

318
00:18:03,520 --> 00:18:05,480
Speaker 5: from the ravages of climate change.

319
00:18:05,640 --> 00:18:10,440
Speaker 1: The ICJ doesn't have the power to enforce the decision

320
00:18:10,560 --> 00:18:14,479
Speaker 1: on its own. US is among the countries that doesn't

321
00:18:14,880 --> 00:18:18,879
Speaker 1: automatically recognize its legal authority. So what weight does this

322
00:18:19,160 --> 00:18:19,879
Speaker 1: opinion have.

323
00:18:20,760 --> 00:18:24,480
Speaker 5: That's right, the ICJ opinions in this kind of case

324
00:18:24,520 --> 00:18:27,720
Speaker 5: our advisory. They don't have enforcement power. Many countries of

325
00:18:27,760 --> 00:18:32,760
Speaker 5: the world do take the ICJ's decisions seriously, and we've

326
00:18:32,800 --> 00:18:36,480
Speaker 5: already seen in quite a few countries around the world

327
00:18:36,480 --> 00:18:40,520
Speaker 5: decisions by their own courts saying that their governments aren't

328
00:18:40,520 --> 00:18:43,119
Speaker 5: doing enough. I think we'll see a lot more of

329
00:18:43,240 --> 00:18:46,480
Speaker 5: those kinds of lawsuits all around the world. We'll see

330
00:18:46,520 --> 00:18:51,160
Speaker 5: more lawsuits brought by environmental groups and others in their

331
00:18:51,280 --> 00:18:55,160
Speaker 5: national courts saying that under the ICJ opinion and other

332
00:18:55,440 --> 00:18:59,119
Speaker 5: legal doctrines, those countries are not doing enough to produce

333
00:18:59,160 --> 00:19:01,840
Speaker 5: their green ask gas missions, and that could lead to

334
00:19:02,840 --> 00:19:07,200
Speaker 5: enforcement by those national courts against those national governments.

335
00:19:07,760 --> 00:19:09,840
Speaker 1: Last year, at least two hundred and twenty six new

336
00:19:09,920 --> 00:19:14,879
Speaker 1: climate cases were brought. Are those mostly against countries? Are

337
00:19:14,920 --> 00:19:18,560
Speaker 1: they against you know, corporations? You know? Where are they

338
00:19:18,560 --> 00:19:19,480
Speaker 1: bringing these suits?

339
00:19:19,840 --> 00:19:22,600
Speaker 5: They're mostly against countries, but very few of them are

340
00:19:22,680 --> 00:19:24,880
Speaker 5: what we call strategic litigation, that is trying to get

341
00:19:24,920 --> 00:19:28,560
Speaker 5: the country to act more broadly, Most of those lawsuits

342
00:19:28,560 --> 00:19:33,800
Speaker 5: are concerning particular projects or our particular small actions. But

343
00:19:33,840 --> 00:19:38,119
Speaker 5: we have seen strategic cases that are ordering countries to

344
00:19:38,160 --> 00:19:46,080
Speaker 5: do more. We saw them in successful cases the Netherlands, Germany, France, Mexico, Nepal, Brazil,

345
00:19:47,280 --> 00:19:51,720
Speaker 5: South Africa. Most recently Hungary, several other countries all around

346
00:19:51,720 --> 00:19:54,320
Speaker 5: the world. We're seeing these kinds of cases, these kinds

347
00:19:54,359 --> 00:19:57,480
Speaker 5: of decisions from the courts, and I think now we'll

348
00:19:57,520 --> 00:19:58,600
Speaker 5: see more of them.

349
00:19:58,760 --> 00:20:01,720
Speaker 1: And our countries complain vying with the results of these

350
00:20:01,840 --> 00:20:03,960
Speaker 1: cases when they're decided.

351
00:20:04,080 --> 00:20:08,280
Speaker 5: Not necessarily that's a very good question. We've seen that

352
00:20:08,560 --> 00:20:12,879
Speaker 5: the countries are doing something but not necessarily enough, and

353
00:20:13,040 --> 00:20:16,280
Speaker 5: frequently the plaintives go back to court to try to

354
00:20:16,320 --> 00:20:20,320
Speaker 5: seek more specific enforcement. So the decisions do have a

355
00:20:20,359 --> 00:20:24,280
Speaker 5: positive effect, but they're not completely solving the problem.

356
00:20:24,920 --> 00:20:27,960
Speaker 1: Are there other international courts that are taking a stand

357
00:20:28,040 --> 00:20:30,119
Speaker 1: on climate Yes.

358
00:20:30,280 --> 00:20:32,160
Speaker 5: In the last year and a half or so, we've

359
00:20:32,200 --> 00:20:35,960
Speaker 5: seen decisions from the European Court of Human Rights, the

360
00:20:36,000 --> 00:20:40,040
Speaker 5: Inter American Court of Human Rights, and the International Tribunal

361
00:20:40,119 --> 00:20:43,040
Speaker 5: on the Law of the Sea, and all three of

362
00:20:43,080 --> 00:20:47,520
Speaker 5: those international tribunals also said that the countries have an

363
00:20:47,560 --> 00:20:51,280
Speaker 5: obligation to reduce their green ass gas emissions and otherwise

364
00:20:51,320 --> 00:20:52,679
Speaker 5: address climate change.

365
00:20:52,960 --> 00:20:57,840
Speaker 1: Is litigation the best way forward for climate activists or

366
00:20:57,880 --> 00:21:00,240
Speaker 1: negotiations ongoing anywhere?

367
00:21:00,720 --> 00:21:03,840
Speaker 5: I wouldn't say that litigation is necessarily the best way.

368
00:21:03,920 --> 00:21:06,800
Speaker 5: I think the best way is to try to get

369
00:21:06,800 --> 00:21:10,960
Speaker 5: politicians to pass and implement strong laws, but in few

370
00:21:11,000 --> 00:21:14,960
Speaker 5: countries as that actually happens. So litigation is one important

371
00:21:14,960 --> 00:21:17,879
Speaker 5: part of the toolkit. It's not the biggest part, but

372
00:21:17,920 --> 00:21:20,000
Speaker 5: it's one important part, and it just became a lot

373
00:21:20,080 --> 00:21:22,000
Speaker 5: stronger with yesterday's decision.

374
00:21:22,240 --> 00:21:25,879
Speaker 1: As far as the United States and the Trump administration,

375
00:21:26,520 --> 00:21:32,400
Speaker 1: how has the Trump administration impacted the environment and environmental protections?

376
00:21:32,720 --> 00:21:36,040
Speaker 5: Well, the Trump administration is basically a denying climate change,

377
00:21:36,080 --> 00:21:37,840
Speaker 5: or at least that they have to do anything about it.

378
00:21:38,040 --> 00:21:42,600
Speaker 5: They're working very hard to stop all of the actions

379
00:21:42,640 --> 00:21:47,360
Speaker 5: that had been taken under previous administrations to control climate change.

380
00:21:47,600 --> 00:21:51,840
Speaker 5: They again withdrew from the Paris Climate Agreement. So the

381
00:21:51,880 --> 00:21:55,520
Speaker 5: Trump administration is very much moving backwards on all of this.

382
00:21:56,200 --> 00:22:00,320
Speaker 1: Let's say that after Trump's term ends, there as a

383
00:22:00,520 --> 00:22:04,840
Speaker 1: president who is more concerned about the environment. Can the

384
00:22:04,840 --> 00:22:07,840
Speaker 1: Trump administration's actions be easily reversed.

385
00:22:08,200 --> 00:22:11,200
Speaker 5: They can be reversed, but it will take time. Of course.

386
00:22:11,200 --> 00:22:14,760
Speaker 5: In the first Trump administration they moved backwards, although not

387
00:22:14,840 --> 00:22:17,440
Speaker 5: as faster as quickly, and then when Biden came in,

388
00:22:17,720 --> 00:22:20,320
Speaker 5: they did reverse of that and secured passage of the

389
00:22:20,320 --> 00:22:25,840
Speaker 5: Inflation Reduction Act, which Congress has now partly revoked. One

390
00:22:25,880 --> 00:22:29,600
Speaker 5: of the big problems is loss of staff, loss of expertise,

391
00:22:29,760 --> 00:22:33,640
Speaker 5: loss of scientific capability. That'll take some time to rebuild.

392
00:22:33,880 --> 00:22:37,240
Speaker 5: So the legal issues most of us can be restored,

393
00:22:37,800 --> 00:22:41,359
Speaker 5: but actually regaining the momentum is going to take time.

394
00:22:41,640 --> 00:22:43,840
Speaker 5: We will have lost a lot of time that we

395
00:22:43,920 --> 00:22:44,360
Speaker 5: don't have.

396
00:22:45,000 --> 00:22:48,520
Speaker 1: What can environmental activists do is it file suits to

397
00:22:48,600 --> 00:22:51,160
Speaker 1: try to slow down the Trump administration.

398
00:22:51,680 --> 00:22:54,080
Speaker 5: Yes, and there's already a lot of that, and quite

399
00:22:54,080 --> 00:22:57,800
Speaker 5: a few of those lossits have had early successes in

400
00:22:57,840 --> 00:23:00,480
Speaker 5: the district court, serve in quite a few preliminary injunctions

401
00:23:00,520 --> 00:23:04,280
Speaker 5: granted against what the Trump administration is doing. And those

402
00:23:04,480 --> 00:23:07,879
Speaker 5: states that still care about climate change are doing a

403
00:23:07,880 --> 00:23:11,960
Speaker 5: lot in New York, California, Massachusetts, Washington, Illinois, several other

404
00:23:12,000 --> 00:23:16,359
Speaker 5: states are acting on their own to reduce their emissions.

405
00:23:16,760 --> 00:23:18,600
Speaker 5: But I think the most important thing that needs to

406
00:23:18,640 --> 00:23:21,760
Speaker 5: be done is is that nepolling place is to elect

407
00:23:21,840 --> 00:23:25,640
Speaker 5: officials at every level, federal, state, and local, who really

408
00:23:25,680 --> 00:23:27,440
Speaker 5: are going to act on climate change.

409
00:23:27,720 --> 00:23:32,840
Speaker 1: I mean, how do climate deniers even support their position?

410
00:23:33,480 --> 00:23:37,000
Speaker 5: Yeah, I mean there's a small handful of climate deniers

411
00:23:37,080 --> 00:23:39,280
Speaker 5: or climate not so batters, as I call them, are

412
00:23:39,280 --> 00:23:42,120
Speaker 5: out there, several of whom have just been hired by

413
00:23:42,160 --> 00:23:46,359
Speaker 5: the federal government to advise them. They're complete outliers in

414
00:23:46,400 --> 00:23:48,440
Speaker 5: the scientific community, but there are a few of those

415
00:23:48,480 --> 00:23:51,600
Speaker 5: out there, and there are some news media outlets that

416
00:23:51,680 --> 00:23:54,960
Speaker 5: put that out. Nobody has the nerve. No lawyer goes

417
00:23:55,000 --> 00:23:58,520
Speaker 5: to court denying climate change. They know that that would

418
00:23:58,520 --> 00:24:01,040
Speaker 5: be a real loser, but we still see that in

419
00:24:01,240 --> 00:24:04,240
Speaker 5: the political arena and in some media outlets.

420
00:24:04,520 --> 00:24:07,840
Speaker 1: Thanks so much. That's Michael Gerard, director of Columbia Law

421
00:24:07,840 --> 00:24:11,919
Speaker 1: school Saban Center for Climate Change Law. And that's it

422
00:24:12,000 --> 00:24:14,560
Speaker 1: for this edition of The Bloomberg Law Show. Remember you

423
00:24:14,600 --> 00:24:17,080
Speaker 1: can always get the latest legal news on our Bloomberg

424
00:24:17,160 --> 00:24:20,800
Speaker 1: Law podcasts. You can find them on Apple Podcasts, Spotify,

425
00:24:20,960 --> 00:24:26,000
Speaker 1: and at www dot Bloomberg dot com, slash podcast, Slash Law,

426
00:24:26,400 --> 00:24:29,000
Speaker 1: and remember to tune into The Bloomberg Law Show every

427
00:24:29,040 --> 00:24:32,960
Speaker 1: weeknight at ten pm Wall Street Time. I'm June Grosso

428
00:24:33,080 --> 00:24:34,679
Speaker 1: and you're listening to Bloomberg