WEBVTT - Impeachment The Sequel

0:00:11.880 --> 0:00:15.440
<v Speaker 1>Greetings and welcome to woke a F with me Danielle Moody.

0:00:15.600 --> 0:00:17.960
<v Speaker 1>I've been using my podcast to expand the scope of

0:00:18.000 --> 0:00:22.920
<v Speaker 1>wokeness from strictly a political lens to include art, relationships, spirituality,

0:00:22.960 --> 0:00:25.919
<v Speaker 1>and so much more. But sometimes we've still got to

0:00:25.960 --> 0:00:29.480
<v Speaker 1>talk about politics on woke a F. Daily every Thursday

0:00:29.640 --> 0:00:32.760
<v Speaker 1>is think Thursday, where I'm joined by two fabulous legal

0:00:32.760 --> 0:00:35.760
<v Speaker 1>guests to break down what's going on in law and government.

0:00:35.920 --> 0:00:38.240
<v Speaker 1>I encourage you to head over to patreon dot com

0:00:38.320 --> 0:00:41.680
<v Speaker 1>slash woke a F and subscribe for just five dollars

0:00:41.720 --> 0:00:44.720
<v Speaker 1>so that you don't miss a single enlightening conversation. But

0:00:44.840 --> 0:00:47.680
<v Speaker 1>since we are living through the historic second impeachment of

0:00:47.720 --> 0:00:50.479
<v Speaker 1>a president who's already left office, I wanted to give

0:00:50.520 --> 0:00:53.640
<v Speaker 1>you a healthy taste of this week's think Thursday discussions.

0:00:54.080 --> 0:00:57.680
<v Speaker 1>First up, former federal prosecutor Glenn Kirshner, who you may

0:00:57.760 --> 0:01:01.840
<v Speaker 1>know from MSNBC Peacock and his own Patreon show. He

0:01:01.960 --> 0:01:04.560
<v Speaker 1>reacted to the opening statements in the impeachment trial and

0:01:04.600 --> 0:01:07.399
<v Speaker 1>gave a legal breakdown of why the impeachment trial of

0:01:07.480 --> 0:01:14.800
<v Speaker 1>citizen Trump is in fact not unconstitutional. Glenn, I feel

0:01:14.800 --> 0:01:17.880
<v Speaker 1>like I don't know. For the last several months, every

0:01:17.880 --> 0:01:21.679
<v Speaker 1>week is another historic week in America. I would like

0:01:21.720 --> 0:01:24.040
<v Speaker 1>to get back to a time when we are bored,

0:01:24.360 --> 0:01:27.319
<v Speaker 1>but that is not the case yet. So we've had

0:01:27.480 --> 0:01:35.759
<v Speaker 1>now our opening statements from both the house managers impeachment managers,

0:01:35.800 --> 0:01:41.240
<v Speaker 1>as well as Donald Trump's last minute substitute B string

0:01:41.280 --> 0:01:44.640
<v Speaker 1>I guess team of lawyers. I want to get your

0:01:44.720 --> 0:01:49.600
<v Speaker 1>initial reactions before we dig in to specifics. So what

0:01:50.000 --> 0:01:54.000
<v Speaker 1>were your overall feelings on what you saw this week?

0:01:55.040 --> 0:01:59.920
<v Speaker 1>And a lot to unpack. So in Impeachment the Sequel,

0:02:00.320 --> 0:02:06.440
<v Speaker 1>Part two, I will say my first impression watching the

0:02:06.520 --> 0:02:10.280
<v Speaker 1>two teams of lawyers is if I ever need lawyers,

0:02:10.680 --> 0:02:14.880
<v Speaker 1>I'm going to Raskins, Nogoose and Cicillini. I Am not

0:02:15.120 --> 0:02:19.960
<v Speaker 1>going to showing and cast right because it really it

0:02:20.120 --> 0:02:23.800
<v Speaker 1>was embarrassing. It wasn't the B team, it was the

0:02:23.919 --> 0:02:26.880
<v Speaker 1>you know, maybe the W team. They were way down

0:02:26.880 --> 0:02:29.639
<v Speaker 1>in the alphabet. I heard Nicole Wade say she counted

0:02:29.760 --> 0:02:33.160
<v Speaker 1>him up, counted Trump's defense teams up. This is the

0:02:33.280 --> 0:02:39.200
<v Speaker 1>seventh defense teams he's had and over the last four years. Yes,

0:02:39.639 --> 0:02:42.080
<v Speaker 1>and he's clearly scraping the bottom of the barrel. So

0:02:42.440 --> 0:02:45.000
<v Speaker 1>it was an embarrassment, and even some of the Republican

0:02:45.080 --> 0:02:50.639
<v Speaker 1>senators said it was an embarrassment. So look, the presentation

0:02:50.960 --> 0:02:57.239
<v Speaker 1>by the three House managers the prosecutors in substance was powerful.

0:02:57.360 --> 0:02:59.880
<v Speaker 1>It was you know, they hit the right legal notes,

0:03:00.040 --> 0:03:03.240
<v Speaker 1>the right factual notes, the right procedural notes, and most

0:03:03.280 --> 0:03:08.120
<v Speaker 1>importantly from an old career trial prosecutor, the right emotional notes.

0:03:08.880 --> 0:03:13.240
<v Speaker 1>You know, the opening montage was put together chronologically in

0:03:13.280 --> 0:03:16.280
<v Speaker 1>a way that I hadn't seen it done before, relating

0:03:16.480 --> 0:03:20.280
<v Speaker 1>kind of almost in real time, how the insurrection unfolded,

0:03:20.320 --> 0:03:23.680
<v Speaker 1>and importantly how it was inspired by Donald Trump. Then

0:03:23.680 --> 0:03:27.720
<v Speaker 1>when the defense team started its presentation, you know, it

0:03:27.760 --> 0:03:30.720
<v Speaker 1>was laughable. But I'll try to leave all the jokes aside.

0:03:30.720 --> 0:03:33.840
<v Speaker 1>That the problem that they had, and they really didn't

0:03:33.880 --> 0:03:36.640
<v Speaker 1>handle it well, is that there are there are two

0:03:36.880 --> 0:03:42.240
<v Speaker 1>enormous hurdles for them to overcome argument that the Constitution

0:03:42.360 --> 0:03:45.920
<v Speaker 1>doesn't allow us to try at a Senate impeachment trial

0:03:46.280 --> 0:03:48.920
<v Speaker 1>a former president who was impeached while he was president.

0:03:49.240 --> 0:03:52.440
<v Speaker 1>The first is the plain language of the Constitution. It

0:03:52.520 --> 0:03:57.080
<v Speaker 1>says that the Senate shall have the power to try

0:03:57.680 --> 0:04:03.200
<v Speaker 1>all impeachments period there's no footnote, there's no caveat, there's

0:04:03.200 --> 0:04:05.840
<v Speaker 1>no asterisk that said the Senate shall have the power

0:04:05.840 --> 0:04:10.520
<v Speaker 1>to try all impeachments unless the president resigned or was

0:04:10.560 --> 0:04:14.119
<v Speaker 1>out of office right quick before the trial kicked off. Right,

0:04:14.760 --> 0:04:18.520
<v Speaker 1>it's a silly argument that the Constitution prohibits it, because

0:04:18.520 --> 0:04:23.760
<v Speaker 1>the contrary is true. The Constitution expressly provides for it

0:04:24.120 --> 0:04:28.960
<v Speaker 1>with no caveats. The second is so the plain language

0:04:28.960 --> 0:04:33.080
<v Speaker 1>of the Constitution kills the defense argument. But the second

0:04:33.160 --> 0:04:36.039
<v Speaker 1>is precedent. When we talk about precedent, Danielle, as you know,

0:04:36.279 --> 0:04:39.919
<v Speaker 1>we're usually talking about court cases, Right, the Supreme Court

0:04:40.000 --> 0:04:43.320
<v Speaker 1>has said X Y and Z, and that's why X

0:04:43.480 --> 0:04:47.080
<v Speaker 1>Y and Z is precedent. Well, because there's this thing

0:04:47.120 --> 0:04:51.520
<v Speaker 1>called the political question doctrine, which says courts are not

0:04:51.640 --> 0:04:56.960
<v Speaker 1>permitted to touch to decide to litigate uniquely political questions

0:04:57.240 --> 0:05:01.559
<v Speaker 1>like impeachment. There will never be court precedent, Supreme Court

0:05:01.680 --> 0:05:04.800
<v Speaker 1>or otherwise on the ins and outs of an impeachment

0:05:04.920 --> 0:05:08.320
<v Speaker 1>hearing because it's a political question. So what do we do.

0:05:08.520 --> 0:05:12.279
<v Speaker 1>We look to historical precedent, we look to political precedent,

0:05:12.480 --> 0:05:16.000
<v Speaker 1>we look to procedural precedent, and we have all of

0:05:16.000 --> 0:05:20.400
<v Speaker 1>that because this exact thing has been done before in

0:05:20.400 --> 0:05:24.599
<v Speaker 1>our nation's history multiple times. And people have probably heard

0:05:24.600 --> 0:05:28.960
<v Speaker 1>about the Marquee case. In eighteen seventy six, the Secretary

0:05:29.000 --> 0:05:33.159
<v Speaker 1>of War, William bell Napp, he was impeached. He resigned

0:05:33.200 --> 0:05:36.080
<v Speaker 1>because he didn't want the Senate to try his impeachment case.

0:05:36.120 --> 0:05:39.440
<v Speaker 1>What did the Senate do? They tried his impeachment case

0:05:39.800 --> 0:05:43.160
<v Speaker 1>even though he had resigned. So in our nation's history

0:05:43.400 --> 0:05:47.000
<v Speaker 1>there is political precedent for the Senate to do exactly

0:05:47.040 --> 0:05:50.279
<v Speaker 1>what the Senate is doing. Those are two big deal

0:05:51.000 --> 0:05:56.120
<v Speaker 1>pieces of information or evidence or precedent that control this thing,

0:05:56.279 --> 0:06:00.440
<v Speaker 1>the Constitution and our nation's history. And the Defense did

0:06:00.440 --> 0:06:04.040
<v Speaker 1>nothing to talk about that. All they did was they

0:06:04.080 --> 0:06:07.279
<v Speaker 1>were rambling. I don't know what they did. It was

0:06:07.400 --> 0:06:11.679
<v Speaker 1>absurd and frankly obscene. And but here's the thing, Danielle,

0:06:11.680 --> 0:06:16.559
<v Speaker 1>because we both saw it. Forty four spineless Republicans took

0:06:16.640 --> 0:06:21.479
<v Speaker 1>the jurisdictional out we talk about in law enforcement, giving

0:06:21.560 --> 0:06:25.040
<v Speaker 1>a suspect and out, like when we're trying to get

0:06:25.040 --> 0:06:28.800
<v Speaker 1>a suspect in a homicide interrogation to admit that he's

0:06:28.839 --> 0:06:31.120
<v Speaker 1>the one who killed the victim. But he didn't want

0:06:31.120 --> 0:06:33.040
<v Speaker 1>to admit it, doesn't want to admit it, we give

0:06:33.080 --> 0:06:35.960
<v Speaker 1>him an out. The out is usually a self defense out. Well,

0:06:35.960 --> 0:06:39.119
<v Speaker 1>you know that guy had a gun, that guy you killed,

0:06:39.200 --> 0:06:40.919
<v Speaker 1>and I heard he was going to pull it on you,

0:06:41.040 --> 0:06:43.359
<v Speaker 1>so you kind of had to kill him in self defense.

0:06:43.560 --> 0:06:45.880
<v Speaker 1>And then the suspect you can see the wheels turning.

0:06:45.920 --> 0:06:49.400
<v Speaker 1>They're like, that's right, I killed him in self defense. Well, no,

0:06:49.480 --> 0:06:51.680
<v Speaker 1>you didn't, because the facts don't support that. But I'm

0:06:51.720 --> 0:06:54.599
<v Speaker 1>glad we've now gotten over the hurdle of the fact

0:06:54.600 --> 0:06:57.760
<v Speaker 1>that you killed him. Let's continue the interrogation. It's called

0:06:57.839 --> 0:07:01.960
<v Speaker 1>giving him an out. The forty four senators took the

0:07:02.080 --> 0:07:07.000
<v Speaker 1>jurisdictional out and let me finish, not finish our conversation,

0:07:07.080 --> 0:07:11.760
<v Speaker 1>but finish on this. You've heard this said in various ways,

0:07:11.800 --> 0:07:14.080
<v Speaker 1>one hundred times by lawyers. You know, the lawyers. I'm

0:07:14.120 --> 0:07:17.800
<v Speaker 1>not crazy about lawyers myself. Yeah, you've heard us say,

0:07:17.960 --> 0:07:20.240
<v Speaker 1>we got the law on our side, Pound on the

0:07:20.320 --> 0:07:22.400
<v Speaker 1>law right when we've got the facts on our side,

0:07:22.440 --> 0:07:25.360
<v Speaker 1>Pound on the facts, when we've gotten either on our side,

0:07:26.080 --> 0:07:30.080
<v Speaker 1>pound on the table, make some noise distract. I'm going

0:07:30.120 --> 0:07:32.960
<v Speaker 1>to add one line based on what I saw yesterday.

0:07:33.040 --> 0:07:34.840
<v Speaker 1>If you don't have the law on your side, and

0:07:34.920 --> 0:07:37.880
<v Speaker 1>you don't have the facts on your side, then pound

0:07:38.280 --> 0:07:44.080
<v Speaker 1>on partisanship and cowardice and weakness, because nothing resonates with

0:07:44.120 --> 0:07:50.520
<v Speaker 1>those Republican senators like partisanship, cowardice, and weakness. And forty

0:07:50.640 --> 0:07:56.600
<v Speaker 1>four of them took the out and that is despicable.

0:07:56.600 --> 0:07:59.960
<v Speaker 1>It's unpatriotic. And if they are willing to sign up

0:08:00.440 --> 0:08:03.280
<v Speaker 1>for insurrection, what the heck else are they willing to

0:08:03.320 --> 0:08:08.000
<v Speaker 1>sign up for? This week on woke af Daily's Think

0:08:08.040 --> 0:08:12.320
<v Speaker 1>Thursday show, I was also joined by legal analyst Midwind Charles,

0:08:12.360 --> 0:08:16.080
<v Speaker 1>founder of Midwind Charles and Associates. Midwind tour into Trump's

0:08:16.080 --> 0:08:19.280
<v Speaker 1>clown car legal team and the absurdity of Mitch McConnell

0:08:19.280 --> 0:08:22.320
<v Speaker 1>delayed the Senate and impeachment hearing until after Trump had

0:08:22.400 --> 0:08:25.160
<v Speaker 1>left office, only to claim that holding the trial after

0:08:25.200 --> 0:08:28.600
<v Speaker 1>he left office would be unconstitutional. I love talking with

0:08:28.680 --> 0:08:31.840
<v Speaker 1>Midwind because, like me, she cuts through the bullshit. So

0:08:31.920 --> 0:08:34.679
<v Speaker 1>be sure to check out our full thirty minute conversation

0:08:34.800 --> 0:08:40.120
<v Speaker 1>at patreon dot com slash woke af With respect to

0:08:40.160 --> 0:08:43.560
<v Speaker 1>the attorneys who were representing Donald Trump, who quite literally

0:08:44.040 --> 0:08:46.920
<v Speaker 1>deserve no respect but please go ahead. It seems as

0:08:46.920 --> 0:08:50.679
<v Speaker 1>though they got their law degrees at Trump University. That

0:08:50.880 --> 0:08:53.760
<v Speaker 1>was not. First of all, that was not lawyering. It

0:08:53.880 --> 0:08:57.920
<v Speaker 1>was incoherent, it was unorganized, it was unclear what points

0:08:57.920 --> 0:09:01.040
<v Speaker 1>they were trying to make, and most importantly, they didn't

0:09:01.040 --> 0:09:04.800
<v Speaker 1>even address the very valid points that the House managers

0:09:04.840 --> 0:09:08.080
<v Speaker 1>made in their opening, which is, if we don't go

0:09:08.160 --> 0:09:11.840
<v Speaker 1>forward with this trial, you are effectively setting the precedent

0:09:12.280 --> 0:09:14.960
<v Speaker 1>for a president to go on a crime spree the

0:09:15.080 --> 0:09:18.840
<v Speaker 1>last week or week before he or she leaves office

0:09:18.840 --> 0:09:22.000
<v Speaker 1>and there would be no accountability. They didn't even address that,

0:09:22.040 --> 0:09:24.400
<v Speaker 1>and to me, that's one of the strongest arguments as

0:09:24.440 --> 0:09:29.160
<v Speaker 1>to why having this trial is constitutional. It is appropriate.

0:09:29.520 --> 0:09:33.720
<v Speaker 1>And following the opening, the Senate did vote going forward

0:09:33.800 --> 0:09:37.800
<v Speaker 1>in favor of this being constitutional, with I think six

0:09:37.880 --> 0:09:41.640
<v Speaker 1>Republicans joining in with all the Democrats. And I also

0:09:41.679 --> 0:09:44.520
<v Speaker 1>find that surprising because I'm like, why would Republicans who

0:09:44.600 --> 0:09:48.920
<v Speaker 1>love power cast a vote that would limit their power?

0:09:49.520 --> 0:09:52.040
<v Speaker 1>But then again, they have never been a party to

0:09:52.120 --> 0:09:54.520
<v Speaker 1>live by precedent. They have never been a party to

0:09:54.559 --> 0:09:58.120
<v Speaker 1>be consistent. We know this with the Amy Cody Barrett

0:09:58.160 --> 0:10:02.320
<v Speaker 1>hearing versus the refusal to have a hearing from Mary Garland.

0:10:02.679 --> 0:10:06.400
<v Speaker 1>But I just thought the presentation by Trump's attorneys was abysmal.

0:10:06.960 --> 0:10:10.520
<v Speaker 1>It was not helpful. There are some arguments that could

0:10:10.520 --> 0:10:13.400
<v Speaker 1>have been made that would have been favorable to Donald

0:10:13.400 --> 0:10:15.520
<v Speaker 1>Trump that would be reasonable. I'm not saying that they

0:10:15.559 --> 0:10:18.920
<v Speaker 1>would be persuasive, but there were reasonable arguments to make.

0:10:19.000 --> 0:10:22.120
<v Speaker 1>For example, is it fair that someone should be held

0:10:22.160 --> 0:10:26.480
<v Speaker 1>responsible for the actions of someone else? Right? A reasonable argument.

0:10:26.960 --> 0:10:29.800
<v Speaker 1>They didn't really even make those kinds of arguments. Yes,

0:10:29.840 --> 0:10:33.160
<v Speaker 1>they talked about First Amendment, but they didn't drive home

0:10:33.280 --> 0:10:37.400
<v Speaker 1>this idea, the danger of holding someone responsible for the

0:10:37.480 --> 0:10:42.200
<v Speaker 1>conduct of someone else. So I just couldn't even quite

0:10:42.240 --> 0:10:45.480
<v Speaker 1>understand what was happening as I listened to the two attorneys.

0:10:45.480 --> 0:10:47.480
<v Speaker 1>It didn't make any sense to me. I mean, at

0:10:47.520 --> 0:10:50.360
<v Speaker 1>one point I tweeted and I said, literally, someone tell

0:10:50.440 --> 0:10:52.800
<v Speaker 1>me what is happening? Because I didn't go to law school, right,

0:10:53.000 --> 0:10:55.800
<v Speaker 1>and so I always ask for clarification what I don't

0:10:55.880 --> 0:10:59.360
<v Speaker 1>understand shit, And everyone was just like, I'm watching it too,

0:10:59.440 --> 0:11:01.959
<v Speaker 1>and I don't know. I have no idea what we're

0:11:01.960 --> 0:11:04.560
<v Speaker 1>looking at, and I don't know what I'm looking at.

0:11:04.920 --> 0:11:08.679
<v Speaker 1>You know, what was striking to me is Claire McCaskill

0:11:08.920 --> 0:11:13.080
<v Speaker 1>on MSNBC. She said something that has stood out to

0:11:13.120 --> 0:11:17.479
<v Speaker 1>me this week, which was that in any other situation,

0:11:19.120 --> 0:11:22.720
<v Speaker 1>law firms, the top law firms in the country, would

0:11:22.760 --> 0:11:26.360
<v Speaker 1>be clamoring to represent the president of the United States,

0:11:26.400 --> 0:11:31.000
<v Speaker 1>because representing the president of the United States is essentially

0:11:31.040 --> 0:11:36.680
<v Speaker 1>a career making moment, like presenting before the Supreme Court, right,

0:11:36.840 --> 0:11:39.800
<v Speaker 1>like it is a career making moment. So what does

0:11:39.840 --> 0:11:43.440
<v Speaker 1>it say that what we know to this point Donald

0:11:43.440 --> 0:11:49.560
<v Speaker 1>Trump has gone through seven different defense teams and now essentially, yes,

0:11:49.800 --> 0:11:53.199
<v Speaker 1>I guess Trump University produced Trump Law School, because that's

0:11:53.240 --> 0:11:56.640
<v Speaker 1>where these folks have come from. Because it looked like

0:11:57.200 --> 0:12:00.400
<v Speaker 1>it didn't even look like a Barnum and Bailey circus.

0:12:00.520 --> 0:12:04.240
<v Speaker 1>It looked like a circus put on by like a

0:12:04.400 --> 0:12:06.640
<v Speaker 1>toddler in dogs like I don't even you know, it

0:12:06.720 --> 0:12:11.559
<v Speaker 1>just didn't It didn't make any sense. And when I watched,

0:12:11.600 --> 0:12:16.560
<v Speaker 1>I wanted to get your reaction to Senator Cassidy, right,

0:12:16.679 --> 0:12:21.280
<v Speaker 1>the only surprise out of the band of forty four

0:12:21.360 --> 0:12:25.520
<v Speaker 1>Republicans who decided that insurrection is absolutely what they're doubling

0:12:25.559 --> 0:12:28.080
<v Speaker 1>down on. They can bullshit all they want and say

0:12:28.080 --> 0:12:31.440
<v Speaker 1>that Oh, it was unconstitutional. Note wasn't Mitch McConnell holding

0:12:31.480 --> 0:12:34.160
<v Speaker 1>up Merritt Garland's seat for three hundred and sixty three

0:12:34.240 --> 0:12:39.000
<v Speaker 1>days that was unconstitutional? This no, especially the fact that

0:12:39.040 --> 0:12:42.920
<v Speaker 1>Mitch McConnell had the option to bring this trial when

0:12:43.040 --> 0:12:45.520
<v Speaker 1>Donald Trump was still in office, which is when he

0:12:45.559 --> 0:12:48.079
<v Speaker 1>was impeached in the House, but chose not to. Right.

0:12:48.640 --> 0:12:51.439
<v Speaker 1>So it's like, oh, it's too late to impeach him,

0:12:51.520 --> 0:12:54.320
<v Speaker 1>and now it was too early to impeach him, right.

0:12:54.559 --> 0:13:00.760
<v Speaker 1>And we know that Mitch McConnell is very kayle of

0:13:01.000 --> 0:13:04.560
<v Speaker 1>holding a hearing and ramming through whatever it is issue

0:13:04.559 --> 0:13:07.520
<v Speaker 1>it is that he wants and exhibit as is the

0:13:07.520 --> 0:13:10.520
<v Speaker 1>Amy Coney Barrett hearing. So the idea that there wasn't

0:13:10.679 --> 0:13:12.959
<v Speaker 1>enough time it couldn't have been done because I believe

0:13:13.000 --> 0:13:15.360
<v Speaker 1>the vote in the House to impeach Donald Trump was

0:13:15.440 --> 0:13:19.000
<v Speaker 1>January thirteenth, so he had what seven more days until

0:13:19.120 --> 0:13:21.920
<v Speaker 1>the end of his term in transition. So we know,

0:13:22.280 --> 0:13:25.439
<v Speaker 1>as we know from the Amy Coney Barrett that if

0:13:25.480 --> 0:13:28.839
<v Speaker 1>Mitch McConnell really wanted to have that trial, he could

0:13:28.840 --> 0:13:32.280
<v Speaker 1>have done it because we saw how quickly and how

0:13:32.400 --> 0:13:36.480
<v Speaker 1>swift the Amy Coney Barrett hearings were done so the art,

0:13:36.559 --> 0:13:39.640
<v Speaker 1>so whatever argument it is that he had to delay

0:13:39.679 --> 0:13:44.440
<v Speaker 1>the trial isn't credible. And again, like I said earlier,

0:13:44.679 --> 0:13:48.199
<v Speaker 1>bad faith, right, the idea, the idea that you would

0:13:48.200 --> 0:13:51.360
<v Speaker 1>delay a trial. And then when it comes time to

0:13:51.480 --> 0:13:53.840
<v Speaker 1>vote as to the idea that you would delay a

0:13:53.840 --> 0:13:56.240
<v Speaker 1>trial such that by the time it happens, Trump is

0:13:56.280 --> 0:13:59.240
<v Speaker 1>no longer in office. And then a vote comes up

0:13:59.280 --> 0:14:01.920
<v Speaker 1>as to whether it is constitutional to go through with

0:14:01.960 --> 0:14:04.600
<v Speaker 1>the trial because he's no longer in office, and you

0:14:04.720 --> 0:14:07.960
<v Speaker 1>vote no when you are the reason as to why

0:14:08.000 --> 0:14:11.320
<v Speaker 1>the trial is happening when he's no longer in office. Again,

0:14:11.480 --> 0:14:16.000
<v Speaker 1>bad faith, bad faith, not someone with integrity, not someone

0:14:16.040 --> 0:14:19.080
<v Speaker 1>with character, and not someone who can be trusted when

0:14:19.080 --> 0:14:22.920
<v Speaker 1>they give their word. And I hope Democrats learn from this.

0:14:22.960 --> 0:14:26.040
<v Speaker 1>I don't know how many times they have to see

0:14:26.400 --> 0:14:30.840
<v Speaker 1>Mitch McConnell and Republicans do this and still try to

0:14:30.880 --> 0:14:35.720
<v Speaker 1>deal with them in anticipation that maybe one day this

0:14:35.760 --> 0:14:38.840
<v Speaker 1>will be the thing to get them to act with

0:14:39.840 --> 0:14:46.640
<v Speaker 1>good faith. Based on the willingness of forty four Republican

0:14:46.680 --> 0:14:49.480
<v Speaker 1>senators to stand with their dear leader instead of the law,

0:14:49.560 --> 0:14:52.840
<v Speaker 1>it looks like Donald Trump will be acquitted a second time,

0:14:53.120 --> 0:14:55.400
<v Speaker 1>but we need to have these conversations to point out

0:14:55.440 --> 0:14:59.160
<v Speaker 1>the lies, hypocrisy, and treason of the Republican Party. If

0:14:59.160 --> 0:15:01.600
<v Speaker 1>you know me, you know I call out the bullshit

0:15:01.760 --> 0:15:04.680
<v Speaker 1>every chance I get. So to hear me and all

0:15:04.720 --> 0:15:07.440
<v Speaker 1>my fabulous woke guests pop off five days a week.

0:15:07.600 --> 0:15:12.280
<v Speaker 1>Subscribe at patreon dot com slash woke af five dollars

0:15:12.280 --> 0:15:15.160
<v Speaker 1>a month get to you five amazing one hour shows

0:15:15.200 --> 0:15:19.200
<v Speaker 1>every single week, including think Thursdays, Woke Wednesdays, and my

0:15:19.240 --> 0:15:22.480
<v Speaker 1>favorite feel good Fridays. You don't want to miss any

0:15:22.520 --> 0:15:25.000
<v Speaker 1>of the wokeness I'm bringing, and once your friends hear it,

0:15:25.160 --> 0:15:29.040
<v Speaker 1>they won't either. So share the love until next time.

0:15:29.200 --> 0:15:31.800
<v Speaker 1>Power to the people and to all the people. Power,

0:15:32.080 --> 0:15:34.120
<v Speaker 1>get woke and stay woke as fuck.