WEBVTT - I Like Your Hate Speech

0:00:01.880 --> 0:00:06.200
<v Speaker 1>Broadcasting live from the Abraham Lincoln Radio Studio, the George

0:00:06.240 --> 0:00:10.320
<v Speaker 1>Washington Broadcast Center, Jack Armstrong and Joe Getty.

0:00:10.240 --> 0:00:17.320
<v Speaker 2>Armstrong and Getty and now he Armstrong and Getty.

0:00:24.440 --> 0:00:26.960
<v Speaker 3>All of this is happening in the background of the

0:00:27.000 --> 0:00:29.440
<v Speaker 3>big thing that the entire region is waiting for, which

0:00:29.480 --> 0:00:32.440
<v Speaker 3>is what will Israel's response to those one hundred and

0:00:32.440 --> 0:00:36.040
<v Speaker 3>eighty ballistic missiles filed by the Iranians just about two

0:00:36.080 --> 0:00:39.040
<v Speaker 3>days ago. What will that response look like? And of

0:00:39.080 --> 0:00:41.280
<v Speaker 3>course that is what is going to set the tone

0:00:41.320 --> 0:00:44.479
<v Speaker 3>and the tempo for this really region wide war that

0:00:44.520 --> 0:00:46.360
<v Speaker 3>we're now seeing. We've been talking to the past year

0:00:46.360 --> 0:00:49.600
<v Speaker 3>about the threat of the regionalization of this conflict between

0:00:49.640 --> 0:00:52.920
<v Speaker 3>Iran and Israel. Now we are seeing it in real time,

0:00:53.200 --> 0:00:55.800
<v Speaker 3>and it's up to the Israelis to determine whether or

0:00:55.840 --> 0:00:58.360
<v Speaker 3>not they are going to pummel Aron and invite a

0:00:58.440 --> 0:01:01.400
<v Speaker 3>further escalation, or they're going to restrain themselves as the

0:01:01.400 --> 0:01:03.360
<v Speaker 3>Biden administration seems to be asking them to do.

0:01:04.000 --> 0:01:07.240
<v Speaker 2>Seems to be. Joe Biden was asked specifically yesterday, should

0:01:08.319 --> 0:01:12.920
<v Speaker 2>Israel take out the nuclear facilities? Is no, No, The

0:01:13.319 --> 0:01:18.760
<v Speaker 2>response needs to be proportional, Okay, what's a proportional response

0:01:18.800 --> 0:01:22.000
<v Speaker 2>to having two hundred ballistic missiles shot at you? It

0:01:22.040 --> 0:01:25.840
<v Speaker 2>seems like seems like taking out the entire government would

0:01:25.840 --> 0:01:28.720
<v Speaker 2>be a proportional response. They're trying to take out your

0:01:28.760 --> 0:01:29.400
<v Speaker 2>biggest city.

0:01:29.840 --> 0:01:32.720
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, a major attack like that, And I'm sure Joe

0:01:32.760 --> 0:01:37.440
<v Speaker 1>Biden will say would say, well, Israel's good at shooting

0:01:37.520 --> 0:01:42.920
<v Speaker 1>down missiles, so a proportional expense is one that doesn't

0:01:42.959 --> 0:01:44.720
<v Speaker 1>do much damaging her on either.

0:01:45.319 --> 0:01:47.720
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, that's not what proportional response means. But I don't

0:01:47.720 --> 0:01:52.040
<v Speaker 2>want to get hung up on that thing again. So

0:01:52.240 --> 0:01:56.640
<v Speaker 2>we have new Joe Biden information. He was asked this morning, well,

0:01:56.680 --> 0:02:01.640
<v Speaker 2>let's listen to the clip and then we can discuss.

0:02:00.120 --> 0:02:05.400
<v Speaker 1>Health striking Iran oil facility CERNCE word discussion.

0:02:05.640 --> 0:02:07.920
<v Speaker 2>I think I think that would be a little anyway

0:02:08.240 --> 0:02:11.520
<v Speaker 2>swift plan to allow strike back against Ron.

0:02:12.120 --> 0:02:13.839
<v Speaker 3>First of all, we don't allow he is real.

0:02:13.919 --> 0:02:17.200
<v Speaker 4>We advis is real, and there's nothing going to happen today.

0:02:17.280 --> 0:02:18.399
<v Speaker 3>We'll talk about that later.

0:02:18.919 --> 0:02:21.440
<v Speaker 2>There's nothing going to happen today, which is probably not

0:02:21.560 --> 0:02:24.840
<v Speaker 2>something he should be saying, because that's not the same

0:02:25.720 --> 0:02:29.000
<v Speaker 2>being at war works. You don't like announce today today

0:02:29.000 --> 0:02:31.040
<v Speaker 2>you're in the clear, so stand down. We're not doing

0:02:31.080 --> 0:02:36.079
<v Speaker 2>anything today. That's odd, element I surprise, et cetera.

0:02:36.560 --> 0:02:39.040
<v Speaker 1>Well, and how about to straight out of that Saturday

0:02:39.120 --> 0:02:41.080
<v Speaker 1>Night Live bit the other night he hit us with

0:02:41.160 --> 0:02:42.240
<v Speaker 1>a well, I tell.

0:02:42.080 --> 0:02:43.680
<v Speaker 2>You what anyway?

0:02:44.240 --> 0:02:47.000
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, whoa, whoa, whoa. That sentence, that sentence, it started

0:02:47.040 --> 0:02:48.000
<v Speaker 1>with such promises.

0:02:48.840 --> 0:02:50.720
<v Speaker 2>What were you going to say? Well, played again. I

0:02:50.760 --> 0:02:52.200
<v Speaker 2>just want to hear that first part again and then

0:02:52.200 --> 0:02:52.800
<v Speaker 2>we'll come in here.

0:02:52.840 --> 0:02:57.400
<v Speaker 1>Michael, do you support is well striking Iran oil facilities?

0:02:57.520 --> 0:02:59.920
<v Speaker 2>Service? Word discuss?

0:03:00.360 --> 0:03:03.440
<v Speaker 5>I think I think that would be a little strip plan.

0:03:03.720 --> 0:03:07.000
<v Speaker 1>Okay, So I think that would be a little anyway.

0:03:07.520 --> 0:03:11.120
<v Speaker 2>Well, he realized he shouldn't be saying that because he

0:03:11.160 --> 0:03:14.160
<v Speaker 2>got in trouble yesterday and rightfully so for saying no

0:03:14.720 --> 0:03:17.600
<v Speaker 2>when asked if they should strike the nuclear facilities. So

0:03:17.800 --> 0:03:21.640
<v Speaker 2>today about the oil refineries, I think that would be

0:03:21.840 --> 0:03:24.520
<v Speaker 2>a little bit we're no. Just saying we're in discussion

0:03:24.560 --> 0:03:27.240
<v Speaker 2>about that obviously puts it on the table like you

0:03:27.240 --> 0:03:31.520
<v Speaker 2>think that'd be okay, which it definitely will be. And

0:03:31.560 --> 0:03:33.880
<v Speaker 2>as he was correct in saying, we don't tell them

0:03:33.880 --> 0:03:35.560
<v Speaker 2>what to do, or shouldn't be telling them what to do.

0:03:37.400 --> 0:03:40.560
<v Speaker 2>Although you know, when you give a country all their stuff,

0:03:42.040 --> 0:03:47.000
<v Speaker 2>it's kind of like if you're if you're adult child

0:03:47.120 --> 0:03:50.640
<v Speaker 2>is going to live at your house. They're adults, but

0:03:50.880 --> 0:03:56.040
<v Speaker 2>they live at your house. So it's not a lot

0:03:56.080 --> 0:04:03.600
<v Speaker 2>like that, You don't think, I well, legally we don't

0:04:03.640 --> 0:04:05.320
<v Speaker 2>have the right to tell Iszuel what to do. But

0:04:05.440 --> 0:04:07.600
<v Speaker 2>I mean, if we give them three to five billion

0:04:07.600 --> 0:04:09.200
<v Speaker 2>dollars a year and eight in the planes and the

0:04:09.240 --> 0:04:13.560
<v Speaker 2>bombs and everything like that, and rearm the velvet dome,

0:04:13.640 --> 0:04:17.960
<v Speaker 2>iron dome, I don't know where it came from for them.

0:04:18.200 --> 0:04:21.920
<v Speaker 2>We have some say.

0:04:20.520 --> 0:04:23.960
<v Speaker 1>Some yeah, but I think it's it's reminiscent of all

0:04:24.040 --> 0:04:27.920
<v Speaker 1>of us. All of us have had bosses, for instance,

0:04:27.960 --> 0:04:31.640
<v Speaker 1>that are smart and innovative and great leaders. We have

0:04:31.760 --> 0:04:35.640
<v Speaker 1>had mediocre bosses. We have had gutless, spineless bosses who've

0:04:35.640 --> 0:04:37.760
<v Speaker 1>got in the way of the productivity of the enterprise.

0:04:38.080 --> 0:04:39.760
<v Speaker 1>I don't care who you are, what the line of

0:04:39.760 --> 0:04:41.680
<v Speaker 1>work you're in, you've probably run into that sort of thing.

0:04:42.240 --> 0:04:46.360
<v Speaker 1>Benjamin Not in Yahoo and the Israeli people have a gutless,

0:04:46.560 --> 0:04:51.200
<v Speaker 1>spineless sugar daddy right and Joe Biden, and they are

0:04:51.279 --> 0:04:54.320
<v Speaker 1>managing upward the best they can. They cannot defer to

0:04:54.360 --> 0:04:57.080
<v Speaker 1>his wishes or it will end in defeat, so they're

0:04:57.080 --> 0:04:59.000
<v Speaker 1>trying to smooth it the best they can.

0:04:59.400 --> 0:05:03.080
<v Speaker 2>Now. From and what I understand, the sentiment is overwhelming

0:05:03.279 --> 0:05:07.360
<v Speaker 2>in Israel, even though Netanyao himself is not that popular,

0:05:07.400 --> 0:05:12.520
<v Speaker 2>although it's gone up in recent months, it's overwhelmingly popular.

0:05:12.680 --> 0:05:16.000
<v Speaker 2>The idea of hitting Iran directly really really hard. So

0:05:16.160 --> 0:05:20.159
<v Speaker 2>he's on solid political ground in his own country on

0:05:20.240 --> 0:05:22.680
<v Speaker 2>some sort of direct attack on Iran, even though our

0:05:22.720 --> 0:05:29.479
<v Speaker 2>prisons said no, or we're having discussions about well, I

0:05:29.520 --> 0:05:35.839
<v Speaker 2>don't think they should. Well anyway, these are a little anyway,

0:05:36.040 --> 0:05:41.080
<v Speaker 2>These are some major decisions like could change world history

0:05:41.160 --> 0:05:42.839
<v Speaker 2>sorts of decisions.

0:05:42.920 --> 0:05:45.080
<v Speaker 1>And these might be lead ups to decisions that are

0:05:45.120 --> 0:05:46.480
<v Speaker 1>ten times as impactful.

0:05:47.000 --> 0:05:51.039
<v Speaker 2>And the guy in charge is, well, we shouldn't. I

0:05:51.040 --> 0:05:55.560
<v Speaker 2>mean I probably oughtn't. I think they anyway?

0:05:55.839 --> 0:05:58.320
<v Speaker 1>What I don't think I'm supposed to talk about this

0:05:59.360 --> 0:06:01.680
<v Speaker 1>Jackie Jackie dead or is she here.

0:06:03.120 --> 0:06:05.360
<v Speaker 2>About our institutions now?

0:06:05.720 --> 0:06:07.920
<v Speaker 1>But he's good to go for another four years as

0:06:07.960 --> 0:06:12.320
<v Speaker 1>of like seventy days ago. Effing believe they were claiming

0:06:12.400 --> 0:06:13.359
<v Speaker 1>that with a straight face.

0:06:15.480 --> 0:06:17.880
<v Speaker 2>Oh my god, And I don't want to.

0:06:18.279 --> 0:06:21.279
<v Speaker 1>I don't want to, I mean change my words.

0:06:21.480 --> 0:06:26.200
<v Speaker 2>So I'm talking to some of Yes, I'm sorry, who's

0:06:26.200 --> 0:06:31.200
<v Speaker 2>from Amas? Wait, there's more. I'm talking to some of

0:06:31.240 --> 0:06:34.359
<v Speaker 2>about there because I've talked to several of you in

0:06:34.360 --> 0:06:38.440
<v Speaker 2>the last couple of days. I brought up the idea

0:06:38.720 --> 0:06:42.479
<v Speaker 2>of I'm concerned about who's making the decisions on a

0:06:42.480 --> 0:06:45.840
<v Speaker 2>lot of this stuff, because I think sometimes Joe Biden

0:06:45.880 --> 0:06:48.560
<v Speaker 2>is capable of being sharp and understanding what's going on

0:06:48.640 --> 0:06:51.160
<v Speaker 2>and making a decision. But I think we all agree

0:06:51.200 --> 0:06:54.120
<v Speaker 2>that there are lots of times he's not, And what

0:06:54.160 --> 0:06:57.200
<v Speaker 2>if something happens when he's not who's making the decisions?

0:06:58.240 --> 0:07:01.200
<v Speaker 2>And as with a few people who said you don't

0:07:01.240 --> 0:07:04.640
<v Speaker 2>know that, I said, no, do you? Yeah, Obama is

0:07:04.680 --> 0:07:07.839
<v Speaker 2>don't you read the news? Obama's making all the decisions

0:07:07.839 --> 0:07:10.920
<v Speaker 2>now him and Hillary. So apparently for some of you,

0:07:11.040 --> 0:07:15.320
<v Speaker 2>that's a story that's floating around somewhere that Obama and

0:07:15.400 --> 0:07:20.280
<v Speaker 2>Hillary are currently running the government. Obama I don't believe that, but.

0:07:21.280 --> 0:07:26.480
<v Speaker 1>Thank Junior always appreciated. I actually think it's you know,

0:07:26.560 --> 0:07:30.200
<v Speaker 1>a lot of Obama's team that's very influential in the

0:07:30.200 --> 0:07:31.400
<v Speaker 1>Biden White House.

0:07:31.160 --> 0:07:35.440
<v Speaker 2>It's blinking on this stuff. Probably with Sullivan discussing with

0:07:35.560 --> 0:07:38.280
<v Speaker 2>the Secretary Defense. Maybe I don't know, because I mean,

0:07:38.360 --> 0:07:40.480
<v Speaker 2>if the Secretary of State says, I think we should blank,

0:07:40.520 --> 0:07:43.160
<v Speaker 2>the Secretary of Defense might say, you don't tell me

0:07:43.160 --> 0:07:46.600
<v Speaker 2>what to do. So I don't know how to make

0:07:46.640 --> 0:07:49.280
<v Speaker 2>those decisions. That's the problem with not having you know,

0:07:49.560 --> 0:07:53.000
<v Speaker 2>the constitutional order working right now is I don't know how.

0:07:53.120 --> 0:07:55.400
<v Speaker 2>That's why I ask who's making the decisions and how,

0:07:55.440 --> 0:07:58.560
<v Speaker 2>because nobody actually has the authority. And let's think we

0:07:59.320 --> 0:08:03.800
<v Speaker 2>go ahead unless Blincoln's coming out of meetings and saying, hey,

0:08:03.840 --> 0:08:07.440
<v Speaker 2>Lloyd Austin, we need to move another aircraft carrier, or

0:08:07.480 --> 0:08:10.480
<v Speaker 2>on the orders of Joe Biden. You know, he's claiming

0:08:10.480 --> 0:08:12.240
<v Speaker 2>that Joe Biden is saying these things. I don't know.

0:08:12.320 --> 0:08:15.680
<v Speaker 1>I was just going to say, we've all seen dramas

0:08:15.680 --> 0:08:19.400
<v Speaker 1>of uh, you know, contested wills or succession at a

0:08:19.520 --> 0:08:23.960
<v Speaker 1>company or whatever, where the doddering oldster is being manipulated

0:08:24.000 --> 0:08:27.800
<v Speaker 1>by the young connivers behind the scenes. And then Totter's

0:08:27.800 --> 0:08:33.680
<v Speaker 1>out and says, yeah, I'm not going to bequeath my

0:08:33.920 --> 0:08:37.520
<v Speaker 1>estate quite yet. I've reconsidered, and everybody looks around like

0:08:37.559 --> 0:08:40.600
<v Speaker 1>they got to him somehow, they got to him because

0:08:40.600 --> 0:08:43.280
<v Speaker 1>they're manipulating the old farts, and that's what's happening at

0:08:43.280 --> 0:08:44.800
<v Speaker 1>the White House almost certainly.

0:08:44.880 --> 0:08:46.760
<v Speaker 2>So you think Jake Sullivan goes in there with the

0:08:46.760 --> 0:08:48.520
<v Speaker 2>piece of paper, could you sign this, sir? It's a

0:08:48.640 --> 0:08:50.880
<v Speaker 2>National blueberry Day and it's just important to you said,

0:08:51.240 --> 0:08:52.880
<v Speaker 2>yet it put your name there and date.

0:08:52.920 --> 0:09:00.000
<v Speaker 1>It's a aircraft. It's an aircraft carrier full of bloe.

0:09:00.679 --> 0:09:04.000
<v Speaker 1>We're gonna donate them to the Polynesians.

0:09:04.080 --> 0:09:08.000
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, Asians. They're dirt hungry keeping their cats.

0:09:08.920 --> 0:09:11.680
<v Speaker 1>And Lloyd Austin's like, what what did you do? You

0:09:11.880 --> 0:09:14.280
<v Speaker 1>conniving bastard. I'm telling you the.

0:09:14.320 --> 0:09:16.600
<v Speaker 2>Movies with his really low voice, what are you doing?

0:09:17.559 --> 0:09:23.040
<v Speaker 2>I think it's important consider carefully, Oh, the lighter side

0:09:23.040 --> 0:09:26.280
<v Speaker 2>of the run up to World War three? I hope

0:09:26.280 --> 0:09:28.839
<v Speaker 2>not hope not in here. But it's freaking weird that

0:09:28.960 --> 0:09:32.920
<v Speaker 2>we got a president that's not capable of like understanding

0:09:33.280 --> 0:09:36.120
<v Speaker 2>in any given time, what the hell's going on? Mesh

0:09:36.160 --> 0:09:38.600
<v Speaker 2>for them Inwa unless you want to get the back

0:09:41.440 --> 0:09:42.000
<v Speaker 2>I tell you what.

0:09:42.040 --> 0:09:46.440
<v Speaker 1>The Mullas are quaking in their slippers whatever they weardals

0:09:46.480 --> 0:09:48.000
<v Speaker 1>hearing that sort of forcefulness.

0:09:49.320 --> 0:09:51.360
<v Speaker 2>It's interesting that so much of the world wears pretty

0:09:51.400 --> 0:09:59.320
<v Speaker 2>much only sandals only. Ah, it's warm there hot, that's it.

0:09:59.320 --> 0:10:03.480
<v Speaker 1>Your feet get all gamy. You don't want that. How

0:10:03.520 --> 0:10:07.000
<v Speaker 1>about a lovely croc for the ayatola. It's got the

0:10:07.000 --> 0:10:11.199
<v Speaker 1>all ventilation holes. They might rock them behind the scenes.

0:10:10.960 --> 0:10:12.400
<v Speaker 2>Where's that Satan's own shoe.

0:10:13.400 --> 0:10:16.240
<v Speaker 1>It's Western decadence, no doubt, but they got them. They

0:10:16.240 --> 0:10:18.719
<v Speaker 1>got them. It's like the all the hypocrisy. Oh, we're

0:10:18.760 --> 0:10:22.199
<v Speaker 1>a devout scholar. I just happen to have seventeen fourteen

0:10:22.240 --> 0:10:24.360
<v Speaker 1>year old wives, right and.

0:10:24.480 --> 0:10:26.520
<v Speaker 2>Crocs, So you think they walk out and sandals and

0:10:26.520 --> 0:10:28.520
<v Speaker 2>then behind the scenes, Ah, back into my crocs.

0:10:28.559 --> 0:10:32.640
<v Speaker 1>Woo. I wish I could not sporting three hundred dollars

0:10:32.720 --> 0:10:36.000
<v Speaker 1>loafers or whatever Western suits.

0:10:36.400 --> 0:10:40.360
<v Speaker 2>Right, dang it, what a situation. So that was just

0:10:40.400 --> 0:10:42.160
<v Speaker 2>a little bit ago that Joe Biden was asked that

0:10:42.320 --> 0:10:45.080
<v Speaker 2>and how much I mean, this is this is the

0:10:45.280 --> 0:10:48.520
<v Speaker 2>biggest international story in the world right now. How hard

0:10:48.640 --> 0:10:50.280
<v Speaker 2>is Israel going to hit Iran?

0:10:51.559 --> 0:10:57.040
<v Speaker 1>And the President's a little anyway.

0:10:56.840 --> 0:11:01.319
<v Speaker 2>We're still discussing that. I don't know, it's a well anyway,

0:11:02.320 --> 0:11:06.720
<v Speaker 2>but it's not gonna happen today. Wow, that was unhelpful.

0:11:07.400 --> 0:11:13.120
<v Speaker 2>All three half sentences were incredibly unhelpful. Yeah, wow, all right,

0:11:13.320 --> 0:11:17.839
<v Speaker 2>we got a lot more on the way.

0:11:18.800 --> 0:11:21.959
<v Speaker 4>Another shocking story coming out of Lebanon that's breaking right now.

0:11:22.120 --> 0:11:26.280
<v Speaker 4>Pagers belonging to members of Hesbola were simultaneously detonated, and

0:11:26.400 --> 0:11:29.640
<v Speaker 4>walkie talkies all over the country began exploding in another

0:11:29.679 --> 0:11:33.080
<v Speaker 4>wave of what appears to be Israeli retaliations, but just

0:11:33.200 --> 0:11:36.839
<v Speaker 4>moments ago, in a truly surreal twist, the rectums of

0:11:36.880 --> 0:11:39.600
<v Speaker 4>goats all over the country exploded at the same time,

0:11:39.679 --> 0:11:43.000
<v Speaker 4>killing an additional one thy eight hundred people and injuring

0:11:43.120 --> 0:11:47.240
<v Speaker 4>thousands of others, as well as killing countless goats. PETA

0:11:47.320 --> 0:11:49.840
<v Speaker 4>has just issued a statement denouncing the actions of the

0:11:49.840 --> 0:11:53.600
<v Speaker 4>IDF for senselessly killing all those goats. However, you'd have

0:11:53.640 --> 0:11:56.040
<v Speaker 4>to think if the IDF was behind this, they may

0:11:56.040 --> 0:11:57.760
<v Speaker 4>have been doing those goats a huge favor.

0:12:00.760 --> 0:12:06.880
<v Speaker 1>How long is that is artificial intelligence generated a fake report?

0:12:07.480 --> 0:12:10.679
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, exactly. You may have played that in violation of

0:12:10.720 --> 0:12:12.479
<v Speaker 2>the state law of California.

0:12:12.760 --> 0:12:16.440
<v Speaker 1>The Gavin News gosh, yeah, the anti parody law.

0:12:16.559 --> 0:12:18.640
<v Speaker 2>That was not Jake Tapper, you know, that fits in

0:12:18.720 --> 0:12:22.360
<v Speaker 2>perfectly with this, did you We didn't talk about John

0:12:22.480 --> 0:12:24.440
<v Speaker 2>Kerry's speech that he gave the other day at the

0:12:24.480 --> 0:12:28.600
<v Speaker 2>World the Economic Forum about the First Amendment, right, and

0:12:28.679 --> 0:12:33.320
<v Speaker 2>it's really quite amazing. Rather than I'm reading from Jonathan

0:12:33.320 --> 0:12:37.280
<v Speaker 2>Turley's piece in the New York Post today, rather than

0:12:37.360 --> 0:12:42.559
<v Speaker 2>extole the benefits of the democratic liberty versus dictatorships and oligarchs,

0:12:42.840 --> 0:12:47.120
<v Speaker 2>John Kerry, presidential candidate in two thousand and four, former

0:12:47.160 --> 0:12:50.360
<v Speaker 2>Secretary of State called the First Amendment of the United

0:12:50.360 --> 0:12:54.160
<v Speaker 2>States Constitution a major block to keeping people from believing

0:12:54.200 --> 0:12:57.320
<v Speaker 2>the wrong things. Here's the quote. You know, there's a

0:12:57.360 --> 0:12:59.679
<v Speaker 2>lot of discussion. I won't talk like John Cary the

0:12:59.679 --> 0:13:02.080
<v Speaker 2>whole time that would it would be kind of fun.

0:13:02.559 --> 0:13:04.600
<v Speaker 2>You know, there's a lot of discussion now about how

0:13:04.640 --> 0:13:08.760
<v Speaker 2>you curb those entities in order to guarantee that you're

0:13:08.800 --> 0:13:11.800
<v Speaker 2>going to have some accountability on facts. But look, if

0:13:11.840 --> 0:13:14.240
<v Speaker 2>people only get to one source, and the source they

0:13:14.240 --> 0:13:16.440
<v Speaker 2>go to is sick and you know, has an agenda

0:13:16.679 --> 0:13:19.840
<v Speaker 2>and they're putting out disinformation, our First Amendment stands as

0:13:19.880 --> 0:13:21.880
<v Speaker 2>a major block to be able to just you know,

0:13:22.160 --> 0:13:25.440
<v Speaker 2>hammer it out of existence. So what we need is

0:13:25.480 --> 0:13:28.120
<v Speaker 2>to win the ground, win the right to govern by

0:13:28.160 --> 0:13:31.120
<v Speaker 2>hopefully winning enough votes that you're free to be able

0:13:31.160 --> 0:13:35.840
<v Speaker 2>to implement change. So Jonathan Turley writes, the freedom to

0:13:35.880 --> 0:13:38.360
<v Speaker 2>be won in this election is to liberate officials who

0:13:38.480 --> 0:13:42.280
<v Speaker 2>look like him, who look like himself, can set about

0:13:42.280 --> 0:13:45.560
<v Speaker 2>controlling what can be said, read or heard. Carry insisted

0:13:45.600 --> 0:13:47.520
<v Speaker 2>that the problem with social media is that the one

0:13:47.559 --> 0:13:52.080
<v Speaker 2>who is controlling what they can say or read needs

0:13:52.120 --> 0:13:57.319
<v Speaker 2>to be dealt with. I I so, do you understand

0:13:57.360 --> 0:14:02.959
<v Speaker 2>what the the powerful like John Kerry and some others

0:14:02.960 --> 0:14:05.680
<v Speaker 2>are saying, what their vision of the First Amendment is

0:14:07.440 --> 0:14:07.920
<v Speaker 2>in their way?

0:14:07.960 --> 0:14:11.320
<v Speaker 1>I think I think the problem And just as an aside,

0:14:11.440 --> 0:14:15.360
<v Speaker 1>it's funny, I have prepared a First AMENDMENTEE segment next segment,

0:14:15.360 --> 0:14:17.120
<v Speaker 1>which is perfect. I'll talk about it for days. But

0:14:17.600 --> 0:14:23.920
<v Speaker 1>I honestly think and it's hard for normal people like

0:14:24.080 --> 0:14:27.080
<v Speaker 1>y'all and like ourselves. I think to picture having this

0:14:27.160 --> 0:14:32.080
<v Speaker 1>sort of hubris. John Carry actually thinks he and his

0:14:32.240 --> 0:14:38.680
<v Speaker 1>ilk have the wisdom, the knowledge, and the well they

0:14:38.680 --> 0:14:42.040
<v Speaker 1>can be trusted with the power of censorship because they'll

0:14:42.080 --> 0:14:45.080
<v Speaker 1>just censor the things that ought to be censored. They

0:14:45.080 --> 0:14:48.440
<v Speaker 1>will just censor misinformation and disinformation to keep the poor fool.

0:14:48.520 --> 0:14:51.440
<v Speaker 1>So he mentioned, who just see one source from being

0:14:51.480 --> 0:14:53.960
<v Speaker 1>misled by the evil doers, We'll give us that right

0:14:54.040 --> 0:14:54.840
<v Speaker 1>and we'll protect you.

0:14:55.520 --> 0:14:59.360
<v Speaker 2>Carrie went on to say that now mostly free speech,

0:14:59.440 --> 0:15:03.640
<v Speaker 2>now most protects corporate interests and threatens essential jobs of

0:15:03.680 --> 0:15:07.120
<v Speaker 2>the state, such as protecting national security and the safety

0:15:07.160 --> 0:15:08.480
<v Speaker 2>and privacy of its citizens.

0:15:10.880 --> 0:15:11.320
<v Speaker 1>Wow.

0:15:12.520 --> 0:15:17.720
<v Speaker 2>Wow, So free speech only protects corporate interests, but the

0:15:17.760 --> 0:15:21.800
<v Speaker 2>government and of course the citizens who belove their government,

0:15:22.840 --> 0:15:25.520
<v Speaker 2>are being screwed by free speech somehow.

0:15:25.520 --> 0:15:27.920
<v Speaker 1>Right, the free speech is getting in the way of

0:15:27.960 --> 0:15:33.000
<v Speaker 1>the security of the state, that is what he said.

0:15:33.440 --> 0:15:33.840
<v Speaker 2>Wow.

0:15:35.120 --> 0:15:41.280
<v Speaker 1>And whether it is deliberate evil doing or just that

0:15:41.360 --> 0:15:48.880
<v Speaker 1>sort of hubristic, you know, naive self regard, I don't know, you.

0:15:48.880 --> 0:15:51.240
<v Speaker 2>Know, maybe it fits in with like the moderators on

0:15:51.400 --> 0:15:53.960
<v Speaker 2>the debate the other night, or the last couple of debates,

0:15:54.000 --> 0:15:58.960
<v Speaker 2>where it's amazing to me that intelligent people can be

0:15:59.120 --> 0:16:03.800
<v Speaker 2>so blind did by their beliefs, that they are fully

0:16:03.840 --> 0:16:06.720
<v Speaker 2>in the camp of our side is all good and

0:16:06.800 --> 0:16:09.120
<v Speaker 2>right and honest, and the other side is evil and awful.

0:16:09.600 --> 0:16:13.160
<v Speaker 2>And it makes perfectly good sense as a decent, law abiding,

0:16:13.280 --> 0:16:15.920
<v Speaker 2>smart person to put my thumb on the scale for

0:16:16.000 --> 0:16:18.440
<v Speaker 2>the side that is good and honest and decent and

0:16:18.520 --> 0:16:21.400
<v Speaker 2>against the side that is evil. And you know, Margaret

0:16:21.440 --> 0:16:25.280
<v Speaker 2>Brennan and O'Donell and so many others seem to believe that,

0:16:25.320 --> 0:16:27.280
<v Speaker 2>and John Carey believes that, Well, I'm on the side

0:16:27.320 --> 0:16:29.240
<v Speaker 2>that is good as honest, and we never abuse our

0:16:29.280 --> 0:16:32.280
<v Speaker 2>power or do anything wrong or lie, so of course

0:16:32.280 --> 0:16:35.560
<v Speaker 2>we can make that decision. What are you even talking about.

0:16:35.080 --> 0:16:38.280
<v Speaker 1>The nightmare of everybody's rights being taken away during COVID, Well,

0:16:38.320 --> 0:16:42.400
<v Speaker 1>the data changed. We didn't hear about the schools in

0:16:42.400 --> 0:16:43.960
<v Speaker 1>Sweden are intent with?

0:16:44.120 --> 0:16:46.960
<v Speaker 2>I think I've had an epiphany, a slow and coming.

0:16:48.840 --> 0:16:50.480
<v Speaker 2>Can you sum it up for us, Well, just that

0:16:50.520 --> 0:16:53.280
<v Speaker 2>these people actually freaking believe that they are on the

0:16:53.320 --> 0:16:55.120
<v Speaker 2>side of what is right and good and that they

0:16:55.200 --> 0:16:57.680
<v Speaker 2>never do wrong, which.

0:16:57.400 --> 0:17:01.000
<v Speaker 1>Is what makes them so scary. Seal Lewis's famous quote

0:17:01.040 --> 0:17:04.520
<v Speaker 1>about the worst sort of oppression is the person who

0:17:04.520 --> 0:17:06.240
<v Speaker 1>believes they're doing it for your own good.

0:17:06.440 --> 0:17:09.360
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, that is what makes it so scary. They actually

0:17:09.440 --> 0:17:10.000
<v Speaker 2>believe it.

0:17:10.840 --> 0:17:14.639
<v Speaker 3>Or on this theme, the car Strong and Getty, some

0:17:14.720 --> 0:17:17.800
<v Speaker 3>business news CVS just and as they're laying off nearly

0:17:17.920 --> 0:17:20.320
<v Speaker 3>three thousand workers in an effort.

0:17:20.000 --> 0:17:23.000
<v Speaker 2>To cut costs. Now, every CVS pharmacy will just have

0:17:23.000 --> 0:17:25.119
<v Speaker 2>a pumpkin bucket filled with pills and as.

0:17:25.000 --> 0:17:27.320
<v Speaker 1>Time as says, please take one.

0:17:28.240 --> 0:17:34.480
<v Speaker 2>That's interesting. Yeah, I uh, I don't think I can

0:17:34.520 --> 0:17:36.919
<v Speaker 2>get any trouble for saying this. So is that the

0:17:36.960 --> 0:17:40.200
<v Speaker 2>CVS One time and because I got one near my house,

0:17:40.280 --> 0:17:42.520
<v Speaker 2>so I used it because it was just so handy

0:17:42.560 --> 0:17:44.879
<v Speaker 2>being a couple of blocks away, especially with the number

0:17:44.880 --> 0:17:49.680
<v Speaker 2>of prescriptions we have in my family. Ah, but is

0:17:49.720 --> 0:17:51.080
<v Speaker 2>there one time and I was getting it's just like

0:17:51.080 --> 0:17:54.440
<v Speaker 2>a ridiculous price for this one prescription, and the person said,

0:17:54.680 --> 0:17:56.800
<v Speaker 2>the pharmacists behind the counter, see, can I talk to

0:17:56.840 --> 0:17:58.720
<v Speaker 2>you for a second. She comes out around we go

0:17:58.760 --> 0:18:00.800
<v Speaker 2>over to the side and she said, you could get

0:18:00.800 --> 0:18:05.160
<v Speaker 2>this at Costco for like eighty cents. Oh. I said, okay,

0:18:05.160 --> 0:18:08.280
<v Speaker 2>thanks for the tip, and I started using the Costco pharmacy.

0:18:08.320 --> 0:18:10.960
<v Speaker 2>It's the best pharmacy there is is the Costco pharmacy

0:18:10.960 --> 0:18:15.560
<v Speaker 2>that I've ever used. Fast friendly, you get somebody on

0:18:15.600 --> 0:18:17.240
<v Speaker 2>the phone right away if you ever have to call.

0:18:17.320 --> 0:18:19.800
<v Speaker 2>The prices. I just I'm not getting paid for this.

0:18:19.880 --> 0:18:21.760
<v Speaker 2>Its just been my personal experience as a guy who

0:18:21.760 --> 0:18:23.160
<v Speaker 2>has lots of prescriptions.

0:18:24.160 --> 0:18:26.720
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, I just don't. Well, we can talk off the airs,

0:18:26.720 --> 0:18:28.679
<v Speaker 1>can I say, doesn't our health plan tell us to

0:18:28.720 --> 0:18:30.000
<v Speaker 1>go to some place?

0:18:30.240 --> 0:18:30.480
<v Speaker 2>Yes?

0:18:31.160 --> 0:18:33.439
<v Speaker 1>Makes us go to a variety of places. Yeah, and

0:18:33.480 --> 0:18:37.000
<v Speaker 1>everybody makes money. Yeah, right, so that's something that.

0:18:37.080 --> 0:18:42.080
<v Speaker 2>The person at CBS pulled me aside. Oh, yes, good

0:18:42.080 --> 0:18:43.840
<v Speaker 2>for her, it's very nice for she cared more about

0:18:43.880 --> 0:18:49.160
<v Speaker 2>you know, me than her business apparently.

0:18:49.520 --> 0:18:53.840
<v Speaker 1>And the executives at CVS has figured out what branch

0:18:53.880 --> 0:18:56.560
<v Speaker 1>that is. And she is now out of work and

0:18:56.600 --> 0:18:59.080
<v Speaker 1>crying softly on her couch at home. Well else, she

0:18:59.200 --> 0:19:03.200
<v Speaker 1>just lost her home thanks to Jack. So, continuing our

0:19:03.359 --> 0:19:07.040
<v Speaker 1>free speech theme, thought this was just great. It's a

0:19:07.080 --> 0:19:10.440
<v Speaker 1>couple of different things. But the free press talking about

0:19:10.440 --> 0:19:13.520
<v Speaker 1>a lot of powerful, well educationd well educated people don't

0:19:13.560 --> 0:19:19.360
<v Speaker 1>understand how free speech works. For example, Tim Walls at

0:19:19.359 --> 0:19:22.440
<v Speaker 1>Tuesday's vice presidential debate, the Minnesota governor said the First

0:19:22.480 --> 0:19:25.960
<v Speaker 1>Amendment does not cover hate speech or yelling fire in

0:19:26.040 --> 0:19:29.160
<v Speaker 1>a crowded theater. Wrong on both counts.

0:19:30.040 --> 0:19:31.479
<v Speaker 2>And I'm a knucklehead at times.

0:19:31.760 --> 0:19:39.360
<v Speaker 1>Right, So it doesn't protect hate speech is an assertion

0:19:39.480 --> 0:19:42.120
<v Speaker 1>you hear ten thousand times a day on America's college campuses.

0:19:42.280 --> 0:19:45.159
<v Speaker 1>That is absolutely patently false. One person's hate speech is

0:19:45.160 --> 0:19:49.480
<v Speaker 1>another person's legitimate criticism. And just anybody who ever claims

0:19:49.480 --> 0:19:52.040
<v Speaker 1>that to you know you are dealing with either a

0:19:52.119 --> 0:19:55.360
<v Speaker 1>muttonhead or a neo Marxist, and reject them.

0:19:55.400 --> 0:20:00.040
<v Speaker 2>I like your hate speech. Probably I hate you, I

0:20:00.080 --> 0:20:00.800
<v Speaker 2>really hate you.

0:20:01.040 --> 0:20:04.800
<v Speaker 1>That is hate speech. Yes. In fact, if you run

0:20:04.800 --> 0:20:07.000
<v Speaker 1>into a person making that claim, I suggest you knock

0:20:07.080 --> 0:20:09.800
<v Speaker 1>them down and run away from them as quickly as possible.

0:20:10.119 --> 0:20:13.080
<v Speaker 1>But the other part that I thought was so very interesting,

0:20:13.119 --> 0:20:16.000
<v Speaker 1>and once again it's our our good friends at thefire

0:20:16.119 --> 0:20:19.400
<v Speaker 1>dot org used to be the Foundation for individual Rights

0:20:19.400 --> 0:20:21.239
<v Speaker 1>and education. Now it's just the what do they call

0:20:21.280 --> 0:20:26.119
<v Speaker 1>themselves foundation for in visual rights? Excellent? I can't remember

0:20:26.119 --> 0:20:28.120
<v Speaker 1>what the E stands for in fire anymore, but they

0:20:28.119 --> 0:20:30.560
<v Speaker 1>are crusaders for the First Amendment and I love them

0:20:30.560 --> 0:20:37.880
<v Speaker 1>for that. Wow. Wow, inappropriate and inaccurate. But you need

0:20:37.960 --> 0:20:41.440
<v Speaker 1>to be silenced anyway. I thought this was so interesting

0:20:42.520 --> 0:20:45.160
<v Speaker 1>in a discussion about the riot at the US Capitol, walstl.

0:20:45.280 --> 0:20:46.600
<v Speaker 1>Vanstir limus free speech.

0:20:46.800 --> 0:20:48.520
<v Speaker 2>You can't, you know, fire in a crowded theater.

0:20:48.760 --> 0:20:54.120
<v Speaker 1>That's the test that's the Supreme Court test. Well, as

0:20:54.200 --> 0:20:57.239
<v Speaker 1>usual with the old coach, he only has half an

0:20:57.280 --> 0:21:00.360
<v Speaker 1>idea what the hell he's talking about? But what's lead

0:21:00.400 --> 0:21:04.119
<v Speaker 1>at times that you've heard expressed a thousand times in

0:21:04.160 --> 0:21:06.760
<v Speaker 1>your life, that you can't yell fire in a crowded theater.

0:21:08.040 --> 0:21:11.399
<v Speaker 1>That that's the Supreme Court's test for unprotected speech is

0:21:11.400 --> 0:21:15.280
<v Speaker 1>both wild, widely held and dead wrong. That phrase comes

0:21:15.280 --> 0:21:18.960
<v Speaker 1>from Justice the infamous Justice for Justice Oliver Wendell Holmes

0:21:19.560 --> 0:21:23.439
<v Speaker 1>in a nineteen nineteen opinion called Shank versus Us and writes,

0:21:23.480 --> 0:21:25.600
<v Speaker 1>fire it's a testament to the power of a well

0:21:25.600 --> 0:21:27.960
<v Speaker 1>turned phrase that we're still hearing it more than one

0:21:28.040 --> 0:21:32.200
<v Speaker 1>hundred years later. Stop and think, can it possibly be true?

0:21:32.280 --> 0:21:35.200
<v Speaker 1>You can't shout fire in a crowded theater? Well, if

0:21:35.240 --> 0:21:38.400
<v Speaker 1>there is a fire, or you really think there is one,

0:21:38.600 --> 0:21:40.520
<v Speaker 1>do you need to be quiet about it? Must you

0:21:40.600 --> 0:21:42.920
<v Speaker 1>remain silent as you race to pull the fire alarm?

0:21:43.320 --> 0:21:44.399
<v Speaker 1>Of course not, that's absurd.

0:21:44.520 --> 0:21:47.800
<v Speaker 2>Well, first of all, I always believe that I've heard

0:21:47.800 --> 0:21:49.280
<v Speaker 2>it my whole life, and I always thought that was

0:21:49.320 --> 0:21:52.119
<v Speaker 2>the test I heard. Sarah Isger of The Dispatch do

0:21:52.200 --> 0:21:54.840
<v Speaker 2>a long piece on this probably similar to what you're

0:21:54.840 --> 0:21:57.560
<v Speaker 2>about to read, like a year ago or something. She said,

0:21:57.600 --> 0:22:01.280
<v Speaker 2>nothing makes me crazier as a Then somebody's saying you

0:22:01.280 --> 0:22:03.760
<v Speaker 2>can't yell fire in a crowded theater. It's not true,

0:22:03.760 --> 0:22:05.159
<v Speaker 2>and I thought it's not. So I listened to the

0:22:05.160 --> 0:22:07.600
<v Speaker 2>whole thing, but I believed it my whole life, and

0:22:07.800 --> 0:22:10.840
<v Speaker 2>I always assumed it meant if there's not a fire,

0:22:11.240 --> 0:22:13.960
<v Speaker 2>not you're not allowed to yell. If there's a fire,

0:22:14.480 --> 0:22:15.520
<v Speaker 2>that would be really awful.

0:22:16.040 --> 0:22:16.879
<v Speaker 1>Well, right, we're working on.

0:22:17.800 --> 0:22:18.640
<v Speaker 2>Is the word.

0:22:19.160 --> 0:22:22.040
<v Speaker 1>But that premise leaves out some crucial details, which is

0:22:22.119 --> 0:22:25.760
<v Speaker 1>precisely why that's not what Justice Holmes wrote. What he

0:22:25.840 --> 0:22:29.000
<v Speaker 1>did write was this, the most stringent protection of free

0:22:29.040 --> 0:22:32.080
<v Speaker 1>speech would not protect a man in falsely shouting fire

0:22:32.160 --> 0:22:37.200
<v Speaker 1>in a theater and causing a panic. Notice the two qualifications.

0:22:37.680 --> 0:22:41.040
<v Speaker 1>The shout of fire has to be false if there

0:22:41.080 --> 0:22:43.240
<v Speaker 1>were fire, a good reasona believe there was, the prohibsion

0:22:43.240 --> 0:22:45.280
<v Speaker 1>does not apply. And don't worry, there's even more to

0:22:45.320 --> 0:22:45.760
<v Speaker 1>it than that.

0:22:45.960 --> 0:22:46.280
<v Speaker 2>Honor.

0:22:46.440 --> 0:22:48.480
<v Speaker 1>Can you be punished if you falsely shout fire in

0:22:48.600 --> 0:22:51.920
<v Speaker 1>a theater? But there is no panic. That means people

0:22:51.960 --> 0:22:56.440
<v Speaker 1>whose alert simply caused no panickers safe from prosecution as.

0:22:56.280 --> 0:22:57.360
<v Speaker 2>For thoroughness's sake.

0:22:57.400 --> 0:23:00.119
<v Speaker 1>Also note that Holmes phrase doesn't touch on whether the

0:23:00.000 --> 0:23:03.040
<v Speaker 1>theaters crowded. You wouldn't get a free pass to falsely

0:23:03.160 --> 0:23:07.560
<v Speaker 1>Panica theater that's only half full either. So and here's

0:23:07.640 --> 0:23:08.800
<v Speaker 1>where it gets interesting.

0:23:09.440 --> 0:23:11.960
<v Speaker 2>That's interesting. So five month theater and there's just three

0:23:12.000 --> 0:23:14.919
<v Speaker 2>of us there. We're watching a very unpopular movie months

0:23:14.920 --> 0:23:16.760
<v Speaker 2>after it came out. There's just three of us in there.

0:23:16.840 --> 0:23:19.320
<v Speaker 2>It's ridiculously cold because they have the air conditioners set

0:23:19.359 --> 0:23:23.160
<v Speaker 2>for a crowd. And I help fire and people say, yeah,

0:23:23.200 --> 0:23:25.159
<v Speaker 2>I thought a shot of smoke too, And everybody just

0:23:25.200 --> 0:23:26.080
<v Speaker 2>gets up and walks out.

0:23:26.080 --> 0:23:27.959
<v Speaker 1>At regular smail, I reckon, we ought to go. This

0:23:28.040 --> 0:23:32.399
<v Speaker 1>movie sucks anyway, right exactly. But again, here's where it

0:23:32.400 --> 0:23:37.160
<v Speaker 1>gets really interesting. So what exactly did Shank do? Because

0:23:37.200 --> 0:23:42.440
<v Speaker 1>he lost unanimously the Supreme Court case, the decision famously

0:23:42.480 --> 0:23:47.399
<v Speaker 1>written by Justice Holmes, he wrote and distributed a pamphlet

0:23:47.560 --> 0:23:51.800
<v Speaker 1>urging Americans to peacefully resist being drafted to fight into

0:23:51.800 --> 0:23:52.560
<v Speaker 1>World War One.

0:23:53.119 --> 0:23:54.960
<v Speaker 2>That's all. That's all he did.

0:23:55.880 --> 0:23:58.879
<v Speaker 1>The true insidiousness of the fire in the crowded theater

0:23:58.960 --> 0:24:01.600
<v Speaker 1>phrase is the way that from the very beginning. It's

0:24:01.640 --> 0:24:04.919
<v Speaker 1>been wielded to justify censorship of a broad range of

0:24:04.960 --> 0:24:08.520
<v Speaker 1>speech that has nothing to do with fires or theaters.

0:24:10.359 --> 0:24:14.639
<v Speaker 1>His pamphlet, it's two pages, were headed long lived the

0:24:14.680 --> 0:24:18.040
<v Speaker 1>Constitution of the United States. Wake up, America, your liberties

0:24:18.040 --> 0:24:22.120
<v Speaker 1>are in danger. Assert your rights, quoted the Thirteenth Amendment,

0:24:22.160 --> 0:24:26.200
<v Speaker 1>which abolished slavery. Labeled the draft a form of involuntary

0:24:26.280 --> 0:24:30.600
<v Speaker 1>servitude and was quite well reasoned, whether you'd agree with

0:24:30.640 --> 0:24:34.920
<v Speaker 1>it or not. In a democracy, in a democratic country,

0:24:34.920 --> 0:24:36.680
<v Speaker 1>each man must have the right to stay whether he's

0:24:36.680 --> 0:24:39.399
<v Speaker 1>willing to join the army. It also said conscription laws

0:24:39.440 --> 0:24:41.880
<v Speaker 1>belong to a bygone age. That's a quote, and urged

0:24:41.960 --> 0:24:44.600
<v Speaker 1>recipients quote to write your congressman and tell him you

0:24:44.680 --> 0:24:48.040
<v Speaker 1>want the law repealed. Do not submit to intimidation. You

0:24:48.080 --> 0:24:50.399
<v Speaker 1>have a right to appeal to any law.

0:24:51.280 --> 0:24:52.200
<v Speaker 2>And for that.

0:24:53.320 --> 0:24:56.719
<v Speaker 1>He was convicted of three counts of violating the Espionage

0:24:56.720 --> 0:25:01.320
<v Speaker 1>Act of nineteen seventeen served six months in jail because

0:25:01.359 --> 0:25:04.000
<v Speaker 1>the Supreme Court said, well, he said, this is a

0:25:04.040 --> 0:25:07.919
<v Speaker 1>clear and present danger. It's like shouting fire in a

0:25:07.960 --> 0:25:13.200
<v Speaker 1>crowded theater. When what he said was one hundred percent

0:25:13.600 --> 0:25:20.960
<v Speaker 1>defensible under the First Amendment, the point being obviously reasonable

0:25:21.160 --> 0:25:27.040
<v Speaker 1>sounding standards and examples are used from the beginning to

0:25:27.160 --> 0:25:29.480
<v Speaker 1>outlaw speech. This one hundred percent defensive.

0:25:29.600 --> 0:25:33.359
<v Speaker 2>So he I'd forgotten that he was. He lost that

0:25:33.440 --> 0:25:36.480
<v Speaker 2>case that a lot of there are a lot of

0:25:36.480 --> 0:25:39.560
<v Speaker 2>things that are happening, particularly in the early early twentieth century,

0:25:39.640 --> 0:25:45.639
<v Speaker 2>that are awful, and the idea that things were better

0:25:45.680 --> 0:25:47.680
<v Speaker 2>back in the day and you know, going the wrong

0:25:47.720 --> 0:25:52.000
<v Speaker 2>direction on every front is not true. You know, you

0:25:52.080 --> 0:25:54.080
<v Speaker 2>back to the days when that sort of thing was happening.

0:25:54.359 --> 0:25:56.919
<v Speaker 2>But I'm trying to think, first of all, in the

0:25:56.920 --> 0:25:59.040
<v Speaker 2>debate the other night, why did Walls bring that up?

0:25:59.040 --> 0:26:03.560
<v Speaker 2>What was his point? What? How did he apply the

0:26:04.000 --> 0:26:06.080
<v Speaker 2>fire theater? Did it have to do?

0:26:06.160 --> 0:26:09.280
<v Speaker 1>I think with social media and the need for social

0:26:09.320 --> 0:26:13.040
<v Speaker 1>media to enforce the dictates of the government to ban

0:26:13.240 --> 0:26:16.639
<v Speaker 1>disinformation and misinformation. I don't remember he was holding the

0:26:17.119 --> 0:26:19.800
<v Speaker 1>big platforms responsible for misinformation.

0:26:19.880 --> 0:26:21.080
<v Speaker 2>And then I was trying to think, when have I

0:26:21.080 --> 0:26:22.840
<v Speaker 2>ever used it before? Like I said, up until a

0:26:22.920 --> 0:26:26.320
<v Speaker 2>year ago, and I'm old, I've believed it my whole life.

0:26:29.920 --> 0:26:32.359
<v Speaker 2>Well it's it's true, though, right I can yell fire,

0:26:35.480 --> 0:26:38.159
<v Speaker 2>Well if I if I what what happens if you

0:26:38.160 --> 0:26:40.440
<v Speaker 2>get if I'm in a crowded theater and I ye'll.

0:26:40.280 --> 0:26:43.440
<v Speaker 1>Think the thread that was not the key point.

0:26:43.680 --> 0:26:45.119
<v Speaker 2>Well, I know, I know, I know, I know, but

0:26:45.119 --> 0:26:47.720
<v Speaker 2>I'm trying to get So if I yell fire in

0:26:47.800 --> 0:26:49.639
<v Speaker 2>a crowded theater and there is a panic and there

0:26:49.680 --> 0:26:53.440
<v Speaker 2>was not a fire, I have committed a crime. Yes,

0:26:53.880 --> 0:26:55.440
<v Speaker 2>since she caused a panic.

0:26:56.000 --> 0:27:01.280
<v Speaker 1>You certainly could be held civilly liable.

0:27:02.280 --> 0:27:04.320
<v Speaker 2>But I'm trying to think in what cases did I

0:27:04.359 --> 0:27:06.919
<v Speaker 2>ever use Have I ever used that argument? I'm not

0:27:06.920 --> 0:27:08.960
<v Speaker 2>sure I have. I think it might just be something

0:27:08.960 --> 0:27:10.879
<v Speaker 2>I heard and thought was interesting, and I believe my

0:27:10.880 --> 0:27:12.800
<v Speaker 2>whole life, I'm not sure I've ever used the argument.

0:27:13.640 --> 0:27:15.879
<v Speaker 2>And it's just an.

0:27:15.800 --> 0:27:18.720
<v Speaker 1>Expression that there is some speech that can be regulated,

0:27:18.760 --> 0:27:22.920
<v Speaker 1>and then is used too to start regulating speech. Yeah,

0:27:22.960 --> 0:27:26.480
<v Speaker 1>And the problem is it's always used improperly and you know,

0:27:26.600 --> 0:27:34.040
<v Speaker 1>and overused interestingly enough, Oliver Weldell Holmes himself backtracked. He

0:27:34.160 --> 0:27:39.679
<v Speaker 1>backpedaled not too long after that and said, you know,

0:27:40.359 --> 0:27:44.440
<v Speaker 1>against peculiar or dangerous peculiar to war the principles of

0:27:44.480 --> 0:27:47.159
<v Speaker 1>the right to free speech is anyway, But it sounded

0:27:47.160 --> 0:27:50.159
<v Speaker 1>like he was admitting he made a mistake. And finally,

0:27:50.160 --> 0:27:53.160
<v Speaker 1>in the nineteen sixty nine case Brandenburg versus Ohio, in

0:27:53.200 --> 0:27:58.320
<v Speaker 1>which KKK leader AKKK leader was convicted for promising revengeance

0:27:58.920 --> 0:28:01.879
<v Speaker 1>against the government in a speech before a small crowd

0:28:01.880 --> 0:28:05.760
<v Speaker 1>of media and clan nut jobs, the Supreme Court pulled

0:28:05.760 --> 0:28:09.000
<v Speaker 1>the plug on shank the original case to discarding its

0:28:09.040 --> 0:28:11.359
<v Speaker 1>clear and present danger tests, the Court replaced it with

0:28:11.359 --> 0:28:14.399
<v Speaker 1>a new test for unlawful incitement. To be punishable, speech

0:28:14.480 --> 0:28:18.600
<v Speaker 1>must be quote directed to inciting or producing imminent lawless

0:28:18.680 --> 0:28:22.960
<v Speaker 1>action and be quote likely to incite or produce such action.

0:28:25.320 --> 0:28:27.080
<v Speaker 2>So then you got I wish I remembered all these

0:28:27.080 --> 0:28:28.800
<v Speaker 2>I've read about these so many times, but I'm not

0:28:28.800 --> 0:28:30.399
<v Speaker 2>good at committing this stuff to memory. And then you

0:28:30.440 --> 0:28:33.240
<v Speaker 2>got the course out of San Francisco with the guy

0:28:33.240 --> 0:28:35.520
<v Speaker 2>who had the F word on his jacket, I think,

0:28:36.040 --> 0:28:37.520
<v Speaker 2>and whether or not he was allowed to be in

0:28:37.560 --> 0:28:39.280
<v Speaker 2>a courtroom with that, and that became a big thing

0:28:39.280 --> 0:28:42.800
<v Speaker 2>in the Supreme Court, I believe ruled Yeah, again, it's

0:28:43.080 --> 0:28:45.960
<v Speaker 2>not cool, it's indelicate. We wish you wouldn't, but it's

0:28:46.000 --> 0:28:46.760
<v Speaker 2>not against the law.

0:28:47.520 --> 0:28:52.680
<v Speaker 1>And there are very, very vanishingly few limitations on the

0:28:52.680 --> 0:28:54.280
<v Speaker 1>First Amendment that are legitimate.

0:28:55.320 --> 0:29:00.600
<v Speaker 2>How do you deal with people who wear obnoxious shirts

0:29:00.640 --> 0:29:04.280
<v Speaker 2>in public? You just hope social pressure deals with it

0:29:04.320 --> 0:29:09.920
<v Speaker 2>over time. Hit him with a bat, which would happen someplaces. Yeah,

0:29:10.040 --> 0:29:11.520
<v Speaker 2>get out of here, their kids.

0:29:11.320 --> 0:29:17.600
<v Speaker 1>Around, Yeah, social pressure call them nasty names. From now on,

0:29:17.680 --> 0:29:19.400
<v Speaker 1>I don't go to many movies, but every movie I

0:29:19.400 --> 0:29:20.840
<v Speaker 1>go to, I'm gonna yell fire at the top of

0:29:20.880 --> 0:29:24.400
<v Speaker 1>my lungs, just to make a point. And then I'm

0:29:24.400 --> 0:29:26.920
<v Speaker 1>gonna say you know, originally, let me tell you about

0:29:27.120 --> 0:29:30.400
<v Speaker 1>nineteen nineteen. This is an interesting story. If you've ever

0:29:30.480 --> 0:29:34.120
<v Speaker 1>wanted to co host a radio show slash podcast, reach

0:29:34.160 --> 0:29:35.280
<v Speaker 1>out to me, Joe Ketty.

0:29:37.480 --> 0:29:40.680
<v Speaker 2>So you're at Barbi two, the reckoning or whatever and.

0:29:42.920 --> 0:29:47.400
<v Speaker 1>Barbie two, the barbining, the pinkinning.

0:29:47.560 --> 0:29:52.480
<v Speaker 2>There you go, Yes, three tries. What finished strong?

0:29:52.600 --> 0:29:58.880
<v Speaker 6>Next New York, theyre Eric Adams blearned the federal bribery

0:29:58.920 --> 0:30:02.560
<v Speaker 6>case against him. May Wan prosecutor said additional charges against

0:30:02.640 --> 0:30:05.960
<v Speaker 6>Adams are possible and new defendants are likely, telling the

0:30:06.040 --> 0:30:10.240
<v Speaker 6>judge we're moving quickly. One possible new charge witness tampering,

0:30:10.280 --> 0:30:13.240
<v Speaker 6>After prosecutors said they have evidence. Adams told a witness

0:30:13.280 --> 0:30:16.120
<v Speaker 6>to lie. Prosecutor said the witness was given a clear

0:30:16.160 --> 0:30:18.680
<v Speaker 6>message from the defendant they should not tell the truth

0:30:18.720 --> 0:30:21.160
<v Speaker 6>to the FBI. The mayor asked the judge to hold

0:30:21.200 --> 0:30:23.840
<v Speaker 6>a trial by March. He says he fully intends to

0:30:23.960 --> 0:30:26.440
<v Speaker 6>be on the ballot for re election a year from now.

0:30:26.960 --> 0:30:28.840
<v Speaker 2>Yeah. So I meant to grab the audio because it

0:30:28.880 --> 0:30:31.480
<v Speaker 2>was kind of entertaining. Yesterday, Eric Adams came out and

0:30:32.840 --> 0:30:34.920
<v Speaker 2>talked to a crowd of supporters, and then there was

0:30:34.960 --> 0:30:38.080
<v Speaker 2>a giant crowd there, and he walked up to the

0:30:38.120 --> 0:30:41.400
<v Speaker 2>podium and said, they're trying to keep me down. They're

0:30:41.400 --> 0:30:43.600
<v Speaker 2>trying to keep you down, and everybody was cheering, and

0:30:43.640 --> 0:30:46.880
<v Speaker 2>we're gonna fight whoa. I mean, he had a lot

0:30:46.880 --> 0:30:49.560
<v Speaker 2>of support right there from people who just think, you know,

0:30:49.760 --> 0:30:53.720
<v Speaker 2>the man, somebody's out to get him. But then you

0:30:53.760 --> 0:30:56.120
<v Speaker 2>combine that with both Jonathan Turley and the Wall Street

0:30:56.160 --> 0:30:58.680
<v Speaker 2>Journal saying, eh, they don't have a very good case here.

0:30:59.160 --> 0:31:02.240
<v Speaker 2>I'm thinking he's both guilty and going to get away

0:31:02.240 --> 0:31:02.520
<v Speaker 2>with it.

0:31:03.560 --> 0:31:07.520
<v Speaker 1>And being railroaded. Can you be railroaded if you're guilty? Yeah,

0:31:07.840 --> 0:31:11.400
<v Speaker 1>Selective prosecution of the sort of things lots of politicians

0:31:11.480 --> 0:31:14.800
<v Speaker 1>do it seemed a little egregious to me, the whole

0:31:15.200 --> 0:31:16.920
<v Speaker 1>guilty ship with Turkey and everything.

0:31:16.920 --> 0:31:20.080
<v Speaker 2>But I wouldn't say he's guilty of a crime. I

0:31:20.080 --> 0:31:21.560
<v Speaker 2>don't know that he's guilty of a crime. I think

0:31:21.560 --> 0:31:25.000
<v Speaker 2>he's guilty of doing things we don't want our politicians

0:31:25.040 --> 0:31:30.600
<v Speaker 2>to do, taking ridiculous gifts from people to give them favors.

0:31:30.640 --> 0:31:33.080
<v Speaker 2>I don't like that, but he certainly might not be

0:31:33.080 --> 0:31:35.800
<v Speaker 2>guilty of a crime. That's the problem the whole that's

0:31:35.800 --> 0:31:39.120
<v Speaker 2>the way the whole politics thing works. So it's really difficult.

0:31:39.160 --> 0:31:41.760
<v Speaker 2>That's why it's so hard to prosecute bribery.

0:31:43.200 --> 0:31:45.240
<v Speaker 1>Well, right, the quid pro quote, there's got to be

0:31:45.280 --> 0:31:49.120
<v Speaker 1>a quo there, and speeding up the fire inspections is

0:31:49.160 --> 0:31:50.760
<v Speaker 1>just not the sort of thing that gets me up

0:31:50.760 --> 0:31:52.480
<v Speaker 1>at arms. I'm not saying I approve of it, and

0:31:52.520 --> 0:31:55.120
<v Speaker 1>I think the guy's half a crook and he's a crackpot.

0:31:55.240 --> 0:31:58.000
<v Speaker 2>But even if it's much much bigger than that, how

0:31:58.040 --> 0:32:01.280
<v Speaker 2>do you unless you have in print somewhere, I wouldn't

0:32:01.360 --> 0:32:05.400
<v Speaker 2>have given you this dam under any circumstances except for

0:32:05.440 --> 0:32:07.560
<v Speaker 2>the fact that you gave me that plane. I mean,

0:32:07.640 --> 0:32:12.440
<v Speaker 2>unless you've got that, there's always a plausible reason that

0:32:12.480 --> 0:32:15.000
<v Speaker 2>you went ahead and signed off on the dam or

0:32:15.040 --> 0:32:17.720
<v Speaker 2>the inspection cleared or whatever.

0:32:19.040 --> 0:32:22.320
<v Speaker 1>I like lakes better than rivers. Rivers they just run

0:32:22.440 --> 0:32:24.440
<v Speaker 1>right away from you. I like to look at the water.

0:32:24.520 --> 0:32:25.440
<v Speaker 1>So I built a dam.

0:32:25.520 --> 0:32:27.640
<v Speaker 2>And we've all seen tons of examples of that. At

0:32:27.680 --> 0:32:29.800
<v Speaker 2>the example I used the other day, they couldn't get

0:32:29.800 --> 0:32:33.360
<v Speaker 2>Obamacare going, which changed healthcare for all of us for

0:32:33.400 --> 0:32:36.400
<v Speaker 2>the rest of our lives, until they got that senator

0:32:36.440 --> 0:32:39.200
<v Speaker 2>from Nebraska to sign on. So they offered him a

0:32:39.240 --> 0:32:43.720
<v Speaker 2>whole bunch of stuff in an omnibus bill to get

0:32:43.760 --> 0:32:46.840
<v Speaker 2>him on board. And she said, yes, Well, how is

0:32:46.920 --> 0:32:51.920
<v Speaker 2>that different than Turkey flying air adams around? Not a

0:32:51.920 --> 0:32:53.959
<v Speaker 2>lot different, Not a whole lot different.

0:32:54.760 --> 0:33:00.320
<v Speaker 1>No, No, indeed, And if you include the fact that

0:33:00.400 --> 0:33:04.600
<v Speaker 1>so much of policy has a positive or negative effect

0:33:04.640 --> 0:33:07.280
<v Speaker 1>on the very stocks that these people are fond of trading,

0:33:07.400 --> 0:33:10.280
<v Speaker 1>ask Nancy Pelosi about that. I mean, then you really

0:33:10.320 --> 0:33:14.160
<v Speaker 1>get into a pole. Hey, if you can vote for this,

0:33:15.040 --> 0:33:18.600
<v Speaker 1>which is really going to help the corn futures in

0:33:18.640 --> 0:33:22.320
<v Speaker 1>my district, I'll get you that bridge and then we'll have,

0:33:22.680 --> 0:33:24.640
<v Speaker 1>you know, the stock prices go up for this other

0:33:24.640 --> 0:33:29.080
<v Speaker 1>stuff we're invested in this Yes winning. Speaking of stock prices,

0:33:29.120 --> 0:33:31.560
<v Speaker 1>I guess oil briefly spiked. I don't know if it'll

0:33:31.640 --> 0:33:35.720
<v Speaker 1>stay spiked on Joe Biden's weird answer.

0:33:35.400 --> 0:33:40.960
<v Speaker 5>About attacking noil refiners in Iran. Oh my God, admit

0:33:41.040 --> 0:33:46.040
<v Speaker 5>me chorus to this history. Who prologue like your humble.

0:33:45.760 --> 0:33:51.640
<v Speaker 1>Patients, prey gently to hear, kindly, to judge the final

0:33:51.680 --> 0:33:53.560
<v Speaker 1>thoughts of Armstrong and Getty.

0:33:53.680 --> 0:33:56.080
<v Speaker 2>Here's your host for final thoughts, heyez Joe Getty.

0:33:56.600 --> 0:33:58.400
<v Speaker 1>Hey, let's get a final thought from everybody on the

0:33:58.440 --> 0:34:00.640
<v Speaker 1>crew to wrap things up for the day. Gleangelow, our

0:34:00.720 --> 0:34:03.920
<v Speaker 1>technical director, will lead the way. Michael final thought. Yeah,

0:34:03.960 --> 0:34:05.560
<v Speaker 1>I don't eat a lot of sweets anymore, but I

0:34:05.560 --> 0:34:08.880
<v Speaker 1>did have one the other day. It's chocolate chip cheesecake. Whoa,

0:34:09.120 --> 0:34:12.040
<v Speaker 1>it was a very small piece. Man Oh, that could

0:34:12.080 --> 0:34:16.840
<v Speaker 1>be my last meal I've ever. You know, get the

0:34:16.840 --> 0:34:18.480
<v Speaker 1>death penalty, that's gonna be my last.

0:34:18.719 --> 0:34:20.200
<v Speaker 2>It's good to have a plan in case you get

0:34:20.280 --> 0:34:21.319
<v Speaker 2>the death penalty.

0:34:21.760 --> 0:34:24.200
<v Speaker 1>I think we all have that plan, which is odd

0:34:24.800 --> 0:34:28.480
<v Speaker 1>since we're all fairly peaceful people. Katie Green are esteemed Newswoman.

0:34:28.520 --> 0:34:31.560
<v Speaker 1>As a final thought, Katie all right, Michael, if you're into.

0:34:31.320 --> 0:34:37.360
<v Speaker 3>That cheesecake factory Adam's Peanut butter cup fudge ripple, Hi.

0:34:39.840 --> 0:34:42.680
<v Speaker 1>The diabean is you can take a bite.

0:34:43.400 --> 0:34:43.799
<v Speaker 5>Come on.

0:34:45.560 --> 0:34:47.879
<v Speaker 1>Yes, I'm here to help you, Michael, not undermine you.

0:34:47.920 --> 0:34:49.759
<v Speaker 1>Like the rest of these runs, I could run it off.

0:34:49.960 --> 0:34:53.880
<v Speaker 2>That's exactly That sounds pretty good, Katie Jack. A final

0:34:53.920 --> 0:34:56.200
<v Speaker 2>thought for us, Yeah, there's a lot of reasons to

0:34:56.480 --> 0:34:59.200
<v Speaker 2>uh want to live a long life, be around for

0:34:59.280 --> 0:35:01.960
<v Speaker 2>my kids, et cetera. But I want to live long

0:35:02.080 --> 0:35:06.240
<v Speaker 2>enough to see the books written when people are finally

0:35:06.280 --> 0:35:09.799
<v Speaker 2>honest about this period of Joe Biden being president, who

0:35:09.880 --> 0:35:12.279
<v Speaker 2>is running things and making decisions and how often was

0:35:12.320 --> 0:35:13.480
<v Speaker 2>he completely out of it?

0:35:15.000 --> 0:35:17.200
<v Speaker 1>Kamala loses Those books will be out within a year.

0:35:17.960 --> 0:35:22.040
<v Speaker 1>I think my final thought is, and I know it's odd,

0:35:22.080 --> 0:35:24.760
<v Speaker 1>but a friend of mine, my neighbor, had a brush

0:35:24.840 --> 0:35:28.239
<v Speaker 1>with death the other day and I've reached out to

0:35:28.280 --> 0:35:30.279
<v Speaker 1>him and you know, let him know we're very, very

0:35:30.280 --> 0:35:32.360
<v Speaker 1>happy it ended the way it did.

0:35:32.480 --> 0:35:35.680
<v Speaker 2>But have you ever dealt with that? How can I?

0:35:35.760 --> 0:35:40.479
<v Speaker 1>Because it has its after effects? What should I say

0:35:40.480 --> 0:35:42.240
<v Speaker 1>to the guy? Is that what would be helpful?

0:35:42.280 --> 0:35:43.120
<v Speaker 2>What's not helpful?

0:35:43.320 --> 0:35:45.960
<v Speaker 1>Mail Bag at Armstrong and Getty dot com.

0:35:46.440 --> 0:35:49.799
<v Speaker 2>That's super glad you're around. That's a good question. We

0:35:49.880 --> 0:35:54.600
<v Speaker 2>will see you tomorrow. God bless America. I'm strong and get.

0:35:54.360 --> 0:35:56.440
<v Speaker 4>You some absolutely stunning remarks.

0:35:56.520 --> 0:35:59.600
<v Speaker 2>He but never gave it.

0:36:00.280 --> 0:36:03.640
<v Speaker 4>Even the particular field and particularly of harsh attacks.

0:36:03.680 --> 0:36:06.000
<v Speaker 1>It's one hundred on the crazy meter. Everyone knows that.

0:36:06.400 --> 0:36:09.120
<v Speaker 3>Really, do want to ask you about your leadership qualities.

0:36:09.239 --> 0:36:11.840
<v Speaker 2>I've become friends with school shooters and from that I

0:36:11.960 --> 0:36:14.200
<v Speaker 2>learned I'm a knucklehead at times. Well, let me tell

0:36:14.239 --> 0:36:15.680
<v Speaker 2>you he's gotta go to hell.

0:36:16.160 --> 0:36:18.480
<v Speaker 1>No, gentlemen, there's a lot to discuss.

0:36:18.520 --> 0:36:20.160
<v Speaker 2>We have to move on. Thank you all very much,

0:36:20.760 --> 0:36:22.040
<v Speaker 2>Armstrong and Getty