WEBVTT - Intel Wins Big Incentives and Huawei Risks Sanctions

0:00:01.600 --> 0:00:05.280
<v Speaker 1>From the Heart where Innovation, money and power Collie in

0:00:05.400 --> 0:00:06.880
<v Speaker 1>Silicon Vallet NBN.

0:00:07.200 --> 0:00:11.280
<v Speaker 2>This is Bloomberg Technology with Caroline Hyde and Ed Ludlow.

0:00:24.360 --> 0:00:27.200
<v Speaker 3>I'm Caroline Heider Bloomberg's Worlday quarters in New York, and

0:00:27.240 --> 0:00:28.800
<v Speaker 3>I'm Ed Ludlow in San Francisco.

0:00:28.880 --> 0:00:30.440
<v Speaker 4>In this is Bloomberg Technology.

0:00:30.600 --> 0:00:34.080
<v Speaker 3>Coming up, we'll talk all things chips as Intel wins

0:00:34.120 --> 0:00:37.040
<v Speaker 3>nearly twenty million dollars of incentives from the US government.

0:00:37.360 --> 0:00:42.000
<v Speaker 5>Plus the Biden administration weighs sanctions on Huawei's secretive chip

0:00:42.280 --> 0:00:45.760
<v Speaker 5>network as the US seeks to curtail China's tech ambitions.

0:00:45.960 --> 0:00:49.159
<v Speaker 3>And look, we've got to talk IPOs Reddit tomorrow. The

0:00:49.200 --> 0:00:51.840
<v Speaker 3>company and shareholders guiding that they could price the offering

0:00:52.120 --> 0:00:55.400
<v Speaker 3>at the top of its marketed ranger, above Astera Labs.

0:00:55.480 --> 0:00:58.280
<v Speaker 3>The CEO joins US later as we expect to pop

0:00:58.360 --> 0:00:59.040
<v Speaker 3>in those shares.

0:00:59.240 --> 0:01:01.480
<v Speaker 6>Exclusive report at from Bloombog.

0:01:01.520 --> 0:01:04.480
<v Speaker 3>The US is considering blacklisting a number of Chinese semiconductor

0:01:04.520 --> 0:01:08.000
<v Speaker 3>firms linked to Huawei. That's after the telecom giant, of course,

0:01:08.040 --> 0:01:10.000
<v Speaker 3>made that significant technological breakthrough.

0:01:10.040 --> 0:01:11.520
<v Speaker 6>It seemed like last year.

0:01:11.880 --> 0:01:13.959
<v Speaker 3>According to sources, We've got to get into it with

0:01:14.000 --> 0:01:17.800
<v Speaker 3>Bloomberg's executive editor for US Government, Michael Shephard.

0:01:17.920 --> 0:01:19.640
<v Speaker 6>Michael, it's great to have you on the show. And

0:01:19.959 --> 0:01:20.840
<v Speaker 6>perhaps we've.

0:01:20.640 --> 0:01:23.839
<v Speaker 3>Seen the reading of the tea leies anticipating yet further

0:01:23.920 --> 0:01:25.319
<v Speaker 3>action on Chinese names.

0:01:25.600 --> 0:01:28.280
<v Speaker 7>Well, I think you're right. What we're seeing is an

0:01:28.319 --> 0:01:33.520
<v Speaker 7>extension of the Biden administration's push to keep China's chip

0:01:33.560 --> 0:01:40.360
<v Speaker 7>making and technological pursuit in check. We have already seen

0:01:40.400 --> 0:01:44.120
<v Speaker 7>them negotiating with the Netherlands, with Japan, with South Korea,

0:01:44.160 --> 0:01:47.280
<v Speaker 7>and other countries to try to prevent China from acquiring

0:01:47.319 --> 0:01:50.240
<v Speaker 7>the gear needed to make those advanced chips like the

0:01:50.240 --> 0:01:53.600
<v Speaker 7>one that we saw Huawei deploy in that phone last summer.

0:01:53.840 --> 0:01:56.040
<v Speaker 7>What was interesting is that the US was caught by

0:01:56.120 --> 0:01:59.920
<v Speaker 7>surprise back then with that particular model of phone, which

0:02:00.000 --> 0:02:03.960
<v Speaker 7>had a seven nanometer chip that was a semiconductor that

0:02:04.000 --> 0:02:06.760
<v Speaker 7>the US had previously thought was out of China's reach.

0:02:07.240 --> 0:02:10.880
<v Speaker 7>And Huawei, remember, has also been in the US cross

0:02:10.919 --> 0:02:13.400
<v Speaker 7>heres for quite some time, for nearly a decade.

0:02:14.680 --> 0:02:15.000
<v Speaker 4>Michael.

0:02:15.000 --> 0:02:18.680
<v Speaker 5>We're just showing the list of Chinese domestic chip names

0:02:19.000 --> 0:02:22.840
<v Speaker 5>that the US, according to our sources, is considering sanctioning.

0:02:22.919 --> 0:02:27.440
<v Speaker 5>Swayshore pst CXMT, the d ram maker. What they all

0:02:27.480 --> 0:02:30.840
<v Speaker 5>have in common, based on my understanding of the reporting,

0:02:31.280 --> 0:02:35.000
<v Speaker 5>is existing ties to Huawei, either they're an affiliate of

0:02:35.040 --> 0:02:39.520
<v Speaker 5>Huawei or Huawei has basically been using those companies to

0:02:39.639 --> 0:02:42.720
<v Speaker 5>try and get access to chip making equipment to which

0:02:42.800 --> 0:02:46.280
<v Speaker 5>Huawei is banned or sanctioned from accessing.

0:02:47.840 --> 0:02:50.960
<v Speaker 7>Well, you're right, Huawei has been on the so called

0:02:51.160 --> 0:02:55.080
<v Speaker 7>entity list, this blacklist since twenty nineteen, and that prohibits

0:02:55.200 --> 0:02:59.519
<v Speaker 7>any US company from selling technology to Huawei unless it

0:02:59.560 --> 0:03:02.960
<v Speaker 7>could spell permission from the Commerce Department. And the concern

0:03:03.080 --> 0:03:05.000
<v Speaker 7>is that while we may have been able to develop

0:03:05.080 --> 0:03:08.200
<v Speaker 7>this advanced chip that I just mentioned by using some

0:03:08.240 --> 0:03:11.600
<v Speaker 7>of these companies as proxies to help get some of

0:03:11.639 --> 0:03:15.160
<v Speaker 7>the technology it needed to make that leap. And so

0:03:15.240 --> 0:03:17.200
<v Speaker 7>now what the US is trying to do, and Commerce

0:03:17.240 --> 0:03:20.160
<v Speaker 7>Secretorary Gina Raymondo has been very clear about trying to

0:03:20.560 --> 0:03:25.360
<v Speaker 7>plug any gaps in access that Huawei may have to

0:03:25.480 --> 0:03:29.760
<v Speaker 7>advance technology. And likewise, the Commerce Department has also been pushing,

0:03:29.800 --> 0:03:34.359
<v Speaker 7>as I mentioned, efforts to try to restrict China's access

0:03:34.440 --> 0:03:39.320
<v Speaker 7>to chip making equipment in other areas as well.

0:03:39.400 --> 0:03:41.320
<v Speaker 5>Okay, and it's important to note that the White House

0:03:41.400 --> 0:03:44.960
<v Speaker 5>National Security Council, the Commerce Department did not comment on

0:03:45.040 --> 0:03:48.520
<v Speaker 5>our story. Representatives all those Chinese domestic names that we

0:03:48.520 --> 0:03:51.120
<v Speaker 5>show didn't respond to comment, but the Ministry of Foreign

0:03:51.120 --> 0:03:55.160
<v Speaker 5>Affairs in China reiterated to us that it resolutely opposes

0:03:55.280 --> 0:04:00.240
<v Speaker 5>US actions that disrupt market order and harm Chinese Enterprises's

0:04:00.240 --> 0:04:03.360
<v Speaker 5>Michael Sheppard out of DC on an incredibly important Bloomberg

0:04:03.520 --> 0:04:04.360
<v Speaker 5>piece of reporting.

0:04:04.400 --> 0:04:06.480
<v Speaker 4>Thank you the other chip News. Let's get back to it.

0:04:06.720 --> 0:04:09.680
<v Speaker 5>US will award Intel eight point five billion dollars in

0:04:09.720 --> 0:04:12.840
<v Speaker 5>grants and as much as eleven billion dollars in loans

0:04:12.880 --> 0:04:16.920
<v Speaker 5>to help the company fund and expansion of its semiconductive factories.

0:04:16.960 --> 0:04:20.719
<v Speaker 5>That's the largest award from a program designed to reinvigorate

0:04:21.000 --> 0:04:23.800
<v Speaker 5>the domestic chip industry. Here with me and San Francisco,

0:04:23.800 --> 0:04:26.680
<v Speaker 5>Bloomberzie and King, we've gone the phone last night with

0:04:26.760 --> 0:04:29.960
<v Speaker 5>Pat Gelsinger. It's a big chunk of money. He told

0:04:30.040 --> 0:04:32.039
<v Speaker 5>us he would have liked more, but he's pretty happy

0:04:32.080 --> 0:04:35.599
<v Speaker 5>with it. The main point is to onshore or re

0:04:35.920 --> 0:04:39.039
<v Speaker 5>onshore the semiconductor industry in this country.

0:04:39.160 --> 0:04:41.760
<v Speaker 8>Yeah, I mean there are two things that play here. Obviously,

0:04:41.880 --> 0:04:44.920
<v Speaker 8>the concentration of advanced manufacturing who's currently in East Asia,

0:04:45.040 --> 0:04:48.760
<v Speaker 8>predominantly Taiwan, but also South Korea. That, as we saw

0:04:48.839 --> 0:04:52.960
<v Speaker 8>during the pandemic and this ongoing dispute with China, is

0:04:53.080 --> 0:04:57.039
<v Speaker 8>a security risk, it's a stability risk. The Biden administration

0:04:57.160 --> 0:05:01.479
<v Speaker 8>wants contingencies, it wants manufacturing in this country. It's backing

0:05:01.560 --> 0:05:04.240
<v Speaker 8>Intel as the best chance of getting that. For Intel,

0:05:05.040 --> 0:05:07.360
<v Speaker 8>they're on the comeback trail. They need money, all right,

0:05:07.600 --> 0:05:09.120
<v Speaker 8>and this is a big chunk of that.

0:05:10.360 --> 0:05:12.880
<v Speaker 3>Let's also think about some of the other names that

0:05:12.920 --> 0:05:14.920
<v Speaker 3>are likely to be incentivized to build here in the

0:05:15.040 --> 0:05:17.599
<v Speaker 3>United States, because it's notable. The US name gets the

0:05:17.600 --> 0:05:20.440
<v Speaker 3>big chunk of change and the announcement, but others are

0:05:20.440 --> 0:05:22.599
<v Speaker 3>going to be receiving it from the likes of Samsung

0:05:22.640 --> 0:05:23.200
<v Speaker 3>for example.

0:05:24.240 --> 0:05:27.320
<v Speaker 8>Yeah, I mean, you can't just back Intel. Intel, you know,

0:05:27.400 --> 0:05:29.600
<v Speaker 8>let's be honest, has kind of fallen behind over the

0:05:29.680 --> 0:05:33.200
<v Speaker 8>last five years. They say they're making a good shake

0:05:33.520 --> 0:05:35.560
<v Speaker 8>of a comeback and that they're close to being back

0:05:35.560 --> 0:05:37.800
<v Speaker 8>where they should be. But if you're looking at it

0:05:37.839 --> 0:05:40.480
<v Speaker 8>from a purely objective point of view, then you have

0:05:40.520 --> 0:05:43.400
<v Speaker 8>to back the winners as well, and that would be Samsung,

0:05:43.440 --> 0:05:46.720
<v Speaker 8>and that would be Taiwan semi conductor Manufacturing, and both

0:05:46.720 --> 0:05:50.400
<v Speaker 8>of those companies are building new facilities in the US.

0:05:50.920 --> 0:05:54.040
<v Speaker 5>I think Pat Gelsinger was honest with us last night

0:05:54.160 --> 0:05:58.120
<v Speaker 5>that the semiconductory industry in this country over a thirty

0:05:58.200 --> 0:06:01.599
<v Speaker 5>year period, went elsewhere. Therefore, it's not going to happen

0:06:01.640 --> 0:06:05.159
<v Speaker 5>overnight bringing it back. But walk our audience through the

0:06:05.160 --> 0:06:07.880
<v Speaker 5>footprint of what they're trying to do. Arizona and Ohio

0:06:07.960 --> 0:06:10.480
<v Speaker 5>are the focus. They also have plans for New Mexico.

0:06:10.880 --> 0:06:13.479
<v Speaker 5>The twenty billion actually goes quite a long way towards

0:06:13.480 --> 0:06:14.440
<v Speaker 5>getting things built.

0:06:15.160 --> 0:06:17.120
<v Speaker 8>It doesn't, It doesn't. I mean, you've got to bear

0:06:17.120 --> 0:06:20.880
<v Speaker 8>in mind one of these plants, twenty billion is just

0:06:20.920 --> 0:06:21.880
<v Speaker 8>about going to cover.

0:06:21.760 --> 0:06:23.760
<v Speaker 4>Its soutariety of that one fab.

0:06:23.760 --> 0:06:26.720
<v Speaker 8>Right, So, I mean, and it's not actually building the factory,

0:06:26.720 --> 0:06:28.560
<v Speaker 8>it's the equipment. It's what the money you give to

0:06:28.560 --> 0:06:31.159
<v Speaker 8>apply materials and everything like that. So it's a massive

0:06:31.200 --> 0:06:34.080
<v Speaker 8>amount of public money. But as you said, as you

0:06:34.160 --> 0:06:36.560
<v Speaker 8>reminded us, he said, it's not as much as I want.

0:06:36.640 --> 0:06:36.760
<v Speaker 7>Right.

0:06:36.800 --> 0:06:41.359
<v Speaker 8>This helps this balances the economics. This makes investing in

0:06:41.400 --> 0:06:44.000
<v Speaker 8>a US facility sort of equivalent to doing it in

0:06:44.040 --> 0:06:46.960
<v Speaker 8>Taiwan or doing it in South Korea. But this is

0:06:47.000 --> 0:06:49.760
<v Speaker 8>not a free pass. This is not a ten year

0:06:49.920 --> 0:06:52.240
<v Speaker 8>kind of extension of Intel's life to do what they

0:06:52.240 --> 0:06:56.200
<v Speaker 8>want for free for free. It's considerable help, but we're

0:06:56.200 --> 0:06:58.239
<v Speaker 8>going to need more money if we want to create

0:06:58.279 --> 0:07:00.000
<v Speaker 8>that basis.

0:07:00.040 --> 0:07:04.240
<v Speaker 3>While the real gem of the chip ecosystem in the

0:07:04.320 --> 0:07:07.440
<v Speaker 3>US and video has still been going out there discussing

0:07:07.520 --> 0:07:10.920
<v Speaker 3>its future plans. It's vision for an AI focused reality

0:07:11.600 --> 0:07:13.400
<v Speaker 3>in what are we learning more from in video? And

0:07:13.400 --> 0:07:15.200
<v Speaker 3>also who they're bathing in their own glory?

0:07:16.440 --> 0:07:20.320
<v Speaker 8>Are they anybody that Jensen Wang mentioned during his massive keynote,

0:07:20.480 --> 0:07:23.920
<v Speaker 8>they start got a bump, and you know, my colleagues

0:07:23.960 --> 0:07:25.640
<v Speaker 8>on the market team wrote a good story about that,

0:07:25.720 --> 0:07:27.840
<v Speaker 8>So have a look at that one. And that's exactly

0:07:27.840 --> 0:07:30.680
<v Speaker 8>what's going on here. They are absolutely central to what's

0:07:30.720 --> 0:07:33.000
<v Speaker 8>going on. The big message was, hey, here's a great

0:07:33.040 --> 0:07:34.680
<v Speaker 8>new tip. Of course it's twice as good as the

0:07:34.680 --> 0:07:37.880
<v Speaker 8>previous one, but don't worry too much about that. There's servers,

0:07:38.000 --> 0:07:41.280
<v Speaker 8>there's networking, there's you name it, and we're going to

0:07:41.320 --> 0:07:44.720
<v Speaker 8>bring this technology to everybody. It's not just going to

0:07:44.720 --> 0:07:46.840
<v Speaker 8>be for Amazon. It's not just going to be for Microsoft.

0:07:47.000 --> 0:07:49.280
<v Speaker 8>We're going to put it out there for corporations yunday.

0:07:49.360 --> 0:07:52.880
<v Speaker 8>Shipbuilding is going to be using AI to make better ships.

0:07:52.920 --> 0:07:53.920
<v Speaker 4>It's everything.

0:07:54.000 --> 0:07:56.040
<v Speaker 8>That was the big message that they kind of rammed

0:07:56.040 --> 0:07:57.800
<v Speaker 8>down our throats over the last couple of days.

0:07:58.200 --> 0:08:00.200
<v Speaker 3>It's Sam sang up the most of six months to

0:08:00.640 --> 0:08:04.360
<v Speaker 3>getting Jensen Lang's blessing a little bit earlier, inking across

0:08:04.360 --> 0:08:06.120
<v Speaker 3>it all in the world of chips, We've got more

0:08:06.120 --> 0:08:07.680
<v Speaker 3>to come. We thank you so much. I mean, while

0:08:07.680 --> 0:08:10.440
<v Speaker 3>coming up, Look, let's just check in on the implication

0:08:10.520 --> 0:08:12.400
<v Speaker 3>of the chip market on the rest of the markets.

0:08:12.480 --> 0:08:15.120
<v Speaker 3>Remember Magnificent seven still driving us to New hus yesterday.

0:08:15.360 --> 0:08:16.400
<v Speaker 6>Where is it going in the future?

0:08:16.400 --> 0:08:19.920
<v Speaker 3>Principal Asset Management chief Global strategist Semashal joins us ed,

0:08:20.000 --> 0:08:20.680
<v Speaker 3>what are you looking at?

0:08:21.400 --> 0:08:23.440
<v Speaker 5>Well, I'm looking at shares of Micron because we're at

0:08:23.440 --> 0:08:26.240
<v Speaker 5>the tail end of earning season. But Micron memory chip maker,

0:08:26.320 --> 0:08:31.640
<v Speaker 5>incredibly important, DRAM highly commoditized, and we've seen recovery in

0:08:31.720 --> 0:08:35.160
<v Speaker 5>d RAM prices and the streets. Expectation is that that

0:08:35.240 --> 0:08:37.840
<v Speaker 5>will result in some feel good for Micron. Where do

0:08:37.960 --> 0:08:41.280
<v Speaker 5>the memory chip makers sit in this AI story? We

0:08:41.360 --> 0:08:42.920
<v Speaker 5>still kind of want to learn that if they're building

0:08:42.920 --> 0:08:45.680
<v Speaker 5>all these data centers, surely they need the memory to

0:08:45.720 --> 0:08:48.640
<v Speaker 5>go in there alongside the GPUs and CPUs. Micro run

0:08:48.720 --> 0:08:50.880
<v Speaker 5>up nine ten to percent, and it's a big earnings

0:08:50.920 --> 0:09:13.600
<v Speaker 5>print after the bell. This is Bloomberg technology.

0:09:08.920 --> 0:09:10.960
<v Speaker 3>Go ahead of the FED decision today, This so called

0:09:11.000 --> 0:09:13.760
<v Speaker 3>Magnificent Seven, a few of them taking a breather, having

0:09:13.880 --> 0:09:17.000
<v Speaker 3>powered benchmarks to new records yesterday. I made all this

0:09:17.120 --> 0:09:19.640
<v Speaker 3>AI hype and indeed the reality being served to us

0:09:19.679 --> 0:09:22.760
<v Speaker 3>from in video for example, the Laters unveilings. They've made

0:09:23.120 --> 0:09:26.560
<v Speaker 3>some of these Magnificent seven names the most crowded trade

0:09:26.640 --> 0:09:27.800
<v Speaker 3>according to Bank of America.

0:09:27.920 --> 0:09:30.439
<v Speaker 6>So is this rarely going to be sustained? Let's get

0:09:30.520 --> 0:09:30.800
<v Speaker 6>into it.

0:09:30.800 --> 0:09:33.800
<v Speaker 3>Principal Asset Management chief Global strategist Seemacha is here with

0:09:33.880 --> 0:09:36.520
<v Speaker 3>us and to talk us through the macro and the

0:09:36.559 --> 0:09:39.600
<v Speaker 3>micro and just tell us how much you think, with

0:09:39.720 --> 0:09:41.959
<v Speaker 3>the macro policy as it is, with the fared as

0:09:41.960 --> 0:09:45.520
<v Speaker 3>it is, whether or not the Magnificent Seven can continue

0:09:45.520 --> 0:09:46.760
<v Speaker 3>to just own this rally.

0:09:46.880 --> 0:09:49.200
<v Speaker 9>Yeah, well, thanks for having me on. It's an interesting

0:09:49.240 --> 0:09:52.199
<v Speaker 9>question right now because coming to this year, there was

0:09:52.679 --> 0:09:54.720
<v Speaker 9>a perspective that actually there was going to be a

0:09:54.720 --> 0:09:57.160
<v Speaker 9>ship away from the MAG seven into other parts of

0:09:57.160 --> 0:09:59.760
<v Speaker 9>the market. But actually what we've seen is because there

0:09:59.760 --> 0:10:02.720
<v Speaker 9>has been in so much macro volatility, so much debates

0:10:02.720 --> 0:10:04.600
<v Speaker 9>still going on about what the FED is going to do,

0:10:05.280 --> 0:10:08.960
<v Speaker 9>that you're still seeing that uncertainty. Mean that investors are

0:10:09.000 --> 0:10:11.240
<v Speaker 9>looking for where they have safety, where they know what

0:10:11.280 --> 0:10:15.079
<v Speaker 9>they can expect, and so that means that actually people's

0:10:15.200 --> 0:10:18.719
<v Speaker 9>interest in MAG seven has been maintained. And of course

0:10:18.720 --> 0:10:21.479
<v Speaker 9>there's always going to be questions about the froppiness evaluations.

0:10:21.800 --> 0:10:24.240
<v Speaker 9>But actually the clients that we're speaking to, they're telling

0:10:24.280 --> 0:10:26.359
<v Speaker 9>us that they really do have belief in the expectations,

0:10:26.400 --> 0:10:29.160
<v Speaker 9>the earnings expectations, so they're not too concerned about the

0:10:29.160 --> 0:10:30.920
<v Speaker 9>froth but they would like to find other parts of

0:10:30.920 --> 0:10:32.920
<v Speaker 9>the market to also increase exposure to.

0:10:33.400 --> 0:10:35.200
<v Speaker 6>And let's talk about other parts of the market.

0:10:35.240 --> 0:10:39.360
<v Speaker 3>Is it therefore a broader part of the AI ecosystem

0:10:39.400 --> 0:10:42.199
<v Speaker 3>we look at other names? Are the global names in particular,

0:10:42.280 --> 0:10:44.960
<v Speaker 3>I think of ASML's done really well over there in Europe,

0:10:44.960 --> 0:10:47.160
<v Speaker 3>We've done some other Asian names doing incredibly well.

0:10:47.200 --> 0:10:48.920
<v Speaker 6>Or is it just getting into other industry groups.

0:10:49.960 --> 0:10:52.120
<v Speaker 9>So there's a bit of both. I mean typically looking

0:10:52.120 --> 0:10:54.720
<v Speaker 9>across TU Asia for the parts of that tech space

0:10:54.760 --> 0:10:57.680
<v Speaker 9>which can do well, but it is also about looking

0:10:57.720 --> 0:10:59.800
<v Speaker 9>at just other parts of the market, other sectors and

0:11:00.080 --> 0:11:02.920
<v Speaker 9>the regions which haven't performed as well, particularly in twenty

0:11:02.960 --> 0:11:06.839
<v Speaker 9>twenty three. So that has been some interest in small

0:11:06.840 --> 0:11:10.599
<v Speaker 9>cap space, but really quite hesitant, but hopefully looking to

0:11:10.640 --> 0:11:12.280
<v Speaker 9>see that once they know what the FED is going

0:11:12.360 --> 0:11:14.120
<v Speaker 9>to do, that they can start dipping their toes more

0:11:14.600 --> 0:11:17.520
<v Speaker 9>deeply into that area. And then other parts of the

0:11:17.520 --> 0:11:20.440
<v Speaker 9>market which you really are not tech focused, places like

0:11:20.480 --> 0:11:23.560
<v Speaker 9>Latin America, where evaluations are really interesting when the macro

0:11:24.160 --> 0:11:26.959
<v Speaker 9>stories are quite compelling as well. So it is a

0:11:27.000 --> 0:11:29.480
<v Speaker 9>bit of variation, but certainly what we're seeing throughout all

0:11:29.520 --> 0:11:31.680
<v Speaker 9>of this is even as interested outside of the US

0:11:31.760 --> 0:11:34.920
<v Speaker 9>tech space is growing, that still doesn't mean that then

0:11:35.040 --> 0:11:36.680
<v Speaker 9>taking it away from US tech either.

0:11:37.880 --> 0:11:41.040
<v Speaker 5>I've been thinking a lot sooner about what's supporting the

0:11:41.160 --> 0:11:44.080
<v Speaker 5>sort of large or megacap tech space in the United

0:11:44.160 --> 0:11:47.560
<v Speaker 5>States right. Earnings are really strong, and even if you

0:11:47.679 --> 0:11:50.280
<v Speaker 5>debate the timing of rate cuts, I think most people

0:11:50.320 --> 0:11:52.880
<v Speaker 5>still think some rate cuts are coming this year. But

0:11:52.960 --> 0:11:55.560
<v Speaker 5>the thing supporting all of it is like this investment

0:11:55.600 --> 0:11:59.800
<v Speaker 5>cycle driven by AI. How much carry does that give

0:11:59.840 --> 0:12:01.800
<v Speaker 5>us through the end of the year. If you call

0:12:01.840 --> 0:12:04.520
<v Speaker 5>it a tailwind, for how long does the tail wind flow?

0:12:06.640 --> 0:12:09.680
<v Speaker 9>It's interesting because actually I would say that that narrative

0:12:10.440 --> 0:12:12.040
<v Speaker 9>for a lot of people is not just the interest

0:12:12.080 --> 0:12:13.800
<v Speaker 9>for the rest of the year, and it really takes

0:12:13.880 --> 0:12:17.480
<v Speaker 9>up a very significant part of the strategic gap allocation,

0:12:17.559 --> 0:12:20.600
<v Speaker 9>not necessarily the tactical ass allocation. The valuations mean that

0:12:20.600 --> 0:12:22.520
<v Speaker 9>from a tactical side, this probably isn't going to be

0:12:22.559 --> 0:12:24.679
<v Speaker 9>the time that you want to be adding your exposure.

0:12:25.240 --> 0:12:28.240
<v Speaker 9>But most people are looking at this megacap space and saying, okay,

0:12:28.240 --> 0:12:29.760
<v Speaker 9>this is something which is going to deliver for the

0:12:29.760 --> 0:12:32.600
<v Speaker 9>next three, five to ten years from beyond because of

0:12:32.640 --> 0:12:36.040
<v Speaker 9>the AI. So actually, I think that tailwind probably maintains

0:12:36.080 --> 0:12:38.320
<v Speaker 9>and carries the space through to the end of the year.

0:12:38.320 --> 0:12:40.520
<v Speaker 9>And obviously, look, the macrospace is going to be important,

0:12:40.800 --> 0:12:43.719
<v Speaker 9>but as you said right now, the narrative is more

0:12:43.720 --> 0:12:45.840
<v Speaker 9>about when is the bed going to cup? Not necessarily

0:12:46.160 --> 0:12:49.000
<v Speaker 9>is the bed gonna cup? So certainly that does help

0:12:49.040 --> 0:12:49.840
<v Speaker 9>the situation too.

0:12:50.600 --> 0:12:52.320
<v Speaker 5>I want to go back to the example of Intel,

0:12:52.320 --> 0:12:54.080
<v Speaker 5>because we were talking about it earlier in the show.

0:12:54.160 --> 0:12:56.320
<v Speaker 5>You know, if you just as a comparison, put Intel

0:12:56.440 --> 0:12:58.880
<v Speaker 5>side by side with the MAG seven, I think it's

0:12:58.920 --> 0:13:02.000
<v Speaker 5>down sixteen seventeen percent so far this year, just got

0:13:02.000 --> 0:13:04.760
<v Speaker 5>twenty billion dollars of awards from the US government, and

0:13:04.800 --> 0:13:08.240
<v Speaker 5>it's another example of something supporting that sector, at least

0:13:08.400 --> 0:13:11.560
<v Speaker 5>the CHIPSAC support. Do you expect investors to kind of

0:13:11.559 --> 0:13:15.079
<v Speaker 5>pay that more credence in the back half of twenty

0:13:15.120 --> 0:13:15.600
<v Speaker 5>twenty four.

0:13:16.880 --> 0:13:19.040
<v Speaker 9>So we are, and I think that is actually a

0:13:19.120 --> 0:13:22.480
<v Speaker 9>really important story is we're trying to see, you know,

0:13:22.520 --> 0:13:25.199
<v Speaker 9>we know how the MAG seven is done, but it's

0:13:25.200 --> 0:13:27.040
<v Speaker 9>now about thinking about whate of the second round effects,

0:13:27.120 --> 0:13:29.480
<v Speaker 9>which are the other parts of the universe which are

0:13:29.480 --> 0:13:31.760
<v Speaker 9>really going to benefit And as you said, Intel is

0:13:31.800 --> 0:13:34.320
<v Speaker 9>one perfect example, but also if you just look outsidely

0:13:34.360 --> 0:13:38.679
<v Speaker 9>in the tech sector, looking to maybe towards agribusiness, healthcare,

0:13:39.400 --> 0:13:41.960
<v Speaker 9>data centers, these are all areas that will benefit as

0:13:41.960 --> 0:13:44.840
<v Speaker 9>a second round from technology. And that's actually where we're

0:13:44.880 --> 0:13:49.040
<v Speaker 9>getting particular client interest of where can they benefit maybe

0:13:49.040 --> 0:13:51.880
<v Speaker 9>where the valuations haven't really moved up as much, but

0:13:51.920 --> 0:13:55.320
<v Speaker 9>they do know that those segments of the market are

0:13:55.400 --> 0:13:58.880
<v Speaker 9>really standing to have some serious gains over the coming

0:13:58.960 --> 0:14:01.800
<v Speaker 9>years from all of the technology moves we've already seen.

0:14:02.880 --> 0:14:05.920
<v Speaker 3>See, man, you are a global strategist, and you are

0:14:05.960 --> 0:14:08.280
<v Speaker 3>a cross asset strategist. I would like to do credit,

0:14:08.280 --> 0:14:11.200
<v Speaker 3>but instead I go to crypto and more broadly, is

0:14:11.200 --> 0:14:13.199
<v Speaker 3>that something you're getting some clients more questions as to

0:14:13.280 --> 0:14:14.559
<v Speaker 3>whether that rallies run out a little?

0:14:16.600 --> 0:14:16.960
<v Speaker 10>Of course.

0:14:17.040 --> 0:14:18.600
<v Speaker 9>I mean when you see the moves that we've had

0:14:18.600 --> 0:14:20.480
<v Speaker 9>in the crypto in flu that you're going to get

0:14:20.520 --> 0:14:23.520
<v Speaker 9>a lot of questions. And you know the questions are,

0:14:23.520 --> 0:14:26.120
<v Speaker 9>of course, is can it continue? But also what we're

0:14:26.120 --> 0:14:28.080
<v Speaker 9>seeing is that investors are looking and saying, well, look,

0:14:28.120 --> 0:14:31.040
<v Speaker 9>this has been legitimized now and there is a real runway.

0:14:31.320 --> 0:14:33.920
<v Speaker 9>They accept that there's a ton of volatility associated with this,

0:14:34.000 --> 0:14:36.280
<v Speaker 9>they have to have a fairly strong stomach, but again

0:14:36.680 --> 0:14:39.560
<v Speaker 9>they're looking at this is a long term and a

0:14:39.600 --> 0:14:41.680
<v Speaker 9>long term perspective, not something that you can maybe trade

0:14:41.760 --> 0:14:44.920
<v Speaker 9>in and out of. So certainly investors are trying to

0:14:44.920 --> 0:14:47.720
<v Speaker 9>find like, where are we going to get the significant

0:14:47.720 --> 0:14:50.080
<v Speaker 9>returns that maybe we've enjoyed in previous years but are

0:14:50.080 --> 0:14:52.320
<v Speaker 9>looking a little bit more like a little less likely

0:14:52.360 --> 0:14:54.560
<v Speaker 9>over the coming years. And that is certainly where crypto

0:14:54.640 --> 0:14:55.360
<v Speaker 9>is coming in more.

0:14:55.200 --> 0:14:55.720
<v Speaker 7>And more.

0:14:57.400 --> 0:15:00.440
<v Speaker 5>Principal asset management chief global strategies seem as are great.

0:15:00.480 --> 0:15:05.880
<v Speaker 5>To catch up with you here on invo technology. Steri

0:15:06.000 --> 0:15:10.320
<v Speaker 5>Labs indicated to open at fifty two dollars fifty six

0:15:10.400 --> 0:15:15.160
<v Speaker 5>cents a share. That's pretty significantly above its IPO price

0:15:15.200 --> 0:15:18.920
<v Speaker 5>of thirty six dollars a share. Shares indicated to open

0:15:18.920 --> 0:15:22.440
<v Speaker 5>at fifty three dollars as of around fifteen minutes past

0:15:22.480 --> 0:15:26.640
<v Speaker 5>eleven Eastern time fifteen minutes past eight am Pacific time.

0:15:26.800 --> 0:15:29.480
<v Speaker 5>It's a forty six percent premium on where they priced.

0:15:29.520 --> 0:15:32.240
<v Speaker 5>Let's get straight to Bloomberg Deal's reporter, Katie Ruth.

0:15:32.760 --> 0:15:36.080
<v Speaker 11>Your reaction, Well, this is the excitement that IPO market

0:15:36.160 --> 0:15:39.640
<v Speaker 11>is needed. There've only been three venture backed IPOs since

0:15:39.640 --> 0:15:45.160
<v Speaker 11>twenty twenty one. Is Sarah Labs popping significantly, which you

0:15:45.240 --> 0:15:49.320
<v Speaker 11>know this is after already pricing above their revised range.

0:15:49.320 --> 0:15:52.040
<v Speaker 11>They kept revising it higher because there was so much

0:15:52.120 --> 0:15:56.280
<v Speaker 11>demand from institutional investors and so the fact that Sarah

0:15:56.400 --> 0:15:59.600
<v Speaker 11>Lab's roadshow went really well shows it proves that there

0:15:59.680 --> 0:16:02.280
<v Speaker 11>is an US through demand for the right companies for

0:16:02.320 --> 0:16:03.480
<v Speaker 11>tech IPOs right now.

0:16:03.960 --> 0:16:06.960
<v Speaker 6>And the reason that it's so well liked is well.

0:16:06.960 --> 0:16:11.960
<v Speaker 3>It developed semiconductor based connectivity solutions. Basically, this is about AI, Katie,

0:16:11.960 --> 0:16:13.760
<v Speaker 3>And do you think therefore we are needing to have

0:16:13.800 --> 0:16:16.840
<v Speaker 3>this element of AI to get investors really excited at

0:16:16.840 --> 0:16:17.200
<v Speaker 3>the moment.

0:16:18.080 --> 0:16:20.320
<v Speaker 11>Yes, that's what it seems like. This is definitely an

0:16:20.400 --> 0:16:24.480
<v Speaker 11>AI related company. They're in chips and you know that's

0:16:24.520 --> 0:16:27.560
<v Speaker 11>been something that's drawn more excite and back to tech again.

0:16:27.600 --> 0:16:30.640
<v Speaker 11>Obviously twenty twenty two was rough, and then twenty twenty

0:16:30.640 --> 0:16:33.000
<v Speaker 11>three people started to get more excited about AI. And

0:16:33.320 --> 0:16:36.520
<v Speaker 11>now in twenty twenty four we're seeing this make it

0:16:36.520 --> 0:16:39.440
<v Speaker 11>to Wall Street in IPOs and there's a lot of

0:16:39.480 --> 0:16:40.200
<v Speaker 11>excitement there.

0:16:40.400 --> 0:16:43.280
<v Speaker 5>Let's get to the other technology IPO due in the

0:16:43.320 --> 0:16:46.800
<v Speaker 5>next twenty four hours. Reddit sources are telling us that

0:16:46.880 --> 0:16:48.480
<v Speaker 5>we're looking at the top end of the range. The

0:16:48.600 --> 0:16:50.920
<v Speaker 5>range was thirty one to thirty four dollars a share,

0:16:51.400 --> 0:16:53.920
<v Speaker 5>which on a diluted basis values.

0:16:53.560 --> 0:16:55.800
<v Speaker 4>Reddit six point four billion. What do we know?

0:16:56.400 --> 0:16:59.120
<v Speaker 11>So, you know, technically hasn't priced yet, but we're already

0:16:59.160 --> 0:17:02.640
<v Speaker 11>hearing positive indications about where it will price. You know,

0:17:02.680 --> 0:17:06.360
<v Speaker 11>they're writing off of the excitement from Astra, which helps,

0:17:06.480 --> 0:17:11.320
<v Speaker 11>you know, excited investors for tech generally, and you know,

0:17:11.359 --> 0:17:13.320
<v Speaker 11>they saw how the market was trading today and they're

0:17:13.320 --> 0:17:16.119
<v Speaker 11>thinking already that this could go well. Technically, it doesn't

0:17:16.119 --> 0:17:20.040
<v Speaker 11>get priced until after the bell, but you know already

0:17:20.080 --> 0:17:21.439
<v Speaker 11>it's looking positive for Reddit.

0:17:21.840 --> 0:17:22.080
<v Speaker 4>Yeah.

0:17:22.119 --> 0:17:24.679
<v Speaker 3>I mean it's going to be music to some of

0:17:24.720 --> 0:17:27.199
<v Speaker 3>the banks. Is when we're at record highs and in

0:17:27.200 --> 0:17:29.480
<v Speaker 3>the days before the IPO being led by Monges Standing, Goldman,

0:17:29.520 --> 0:17:32.960
<v Speaker 3>sax Shaping, Morgan, Bank of America, Katie. This is a

0:17:33.119 --> 0:17:35.760
<v Speaker 3>name that people have anticipated coming to the market for

0:17:35.840 --> 0:17:39.280
<v Speaker 3>so long. How is some of the allocation going to

0:17:39.560 --> 0:17:42.120
<v Speaker 3>the regets themselves? Because they want to ensure that their

0:17:42.119 --> 0:17:44.679
<v Speaker 3>community is supportive of them going public.

0:17:45.520 --> 0:17:48.080
<v Speaker 11>That's right. They're allocating shares to some of their top

0:17:48.119 --> 0:17:50.679
<v Speaker 11>Breddit users. And you know the way this works is

0:17:51.040 --> 0:17:54.080
<v Speaker 11>normally it's a wall street that gets access at the

0:17:54.119 --> 0:17:58.560
<v Speaker 11>IPO price. Normally, an average retail investor can only buy

0:17:59.000 --> 0:18:01.280
<v Speaker 11>after it begins trade on the first day, and they

0:18:01.320 --> 0:18:04.280
<v Speaker 11>don't have access to that much of that pop that

0:18:04.359 --> 0:18:06.720
<v Speaker 11>we see, and so this is a way to kind

0:18:06.720 --> 0:18:09.480
<v Speaker 11>of gift that to some of their top users. We

0:18:09.600 --> 0:18:12.960
<v Speaker 11>have seen this with a couple of other consumer facing

0:18:13.000 --> 0:18:16.080
<v Speaker 11>IPOs now but this is part of that trend.

0:18:16.640 --> 0:18:19.919
<v Speaker 5>I think what's interesting about Reddit is relatively complicated history.

0:18:20.040 --> 0:18:22.879
<v Speaker 5>Founded two thousand and five, had a y combinator as well,

0:18:23.400 --> 0:18:26.840
<v Speaker 5>then bought by Conde Nas very quickly spun out twenty eleven,

0:18:27.320 --> 0:18:29.159
<v Speaker 5>and as carry pointed out, we've been waiting.

0:18:28.920 --> 0:18:29.560
<v Speaker 4>A long time.

0:18:30.240 --> 0:18:32.520
<v Speaker 5>There is also how this IPA is going to work.

0:18:32.600 --> 0:18:35.479
<v Speaker 5>So some of the sheds to insiders and staff, some

0:18:35.520 --> 0:18:38.800
<v Speaker 5>of them to redditors themselves. How does that impact the mechanics?

0:18:39.280 --> 0:18:39.560
<v Speaker 4>Sure?

0:18:39.680 --> 0:18:41.800
<v Speaker 11>So, you know, what we saw on this is that

0:18:41.920 --> 0:18:44.880
<v Speaker 11>we had smaller than usual stakes for some of the

0:18:45.080 --> 0:18:48.440
<v Speaker 11>institutional shareholders like venture capitalists, and that's part of that,

0:18:48.800 --> 0:18:52.119
<v Speaker 11>you know, because they were spun out of Advanced the

0:18:52.160 --> 0:18:57.000
<v Speaker 11>Conde Nas parent, the founders had really small stakes, you know,

0:18:57.240 --> 0:19:00.440
<v Speaker 11>less than five percent for them, and that's not something

0:19:00.440 --> 0:19:03.439
<v Speaker 11>we typically see at the time of an IPL. But

0:19:03.960 --> 0:19:06.560
<v Speaker 11>you know, this is a company that's going public after

0:19:06.720 --> 0:19:10.000
<v Speaker 11>being around for nineteen years. That's really really long for

0:19:10.080 --> 0:19:12.760
<v Speaker 11>a startup to IPL. But again, this is technically the

0:19:12.880 --> 0:19:15.639
<v Speaker 11>second exit for Reddit because they were sold in the

0:19:15.680 --> 0:19:18.240
<v Speaker 11>early days and then now spun out.

0:19:19.160 --> 0:19:23.360
<v Speaker 3>Question is profitability from these companies as of when it's

0:19:23.400 --> 0:19:26.359
<v Speaker 3>hit Katie Woof, We thank you so much for breaking

0:19:26.400 --> 0:19:28.119
<v Speaker 3>it down. It feels like a bit of an IPO

0:19:28.240 --> 0:19:38.440
<v Speaker 3>Mini Frenzy. Welcome back to Bloomberg Technology and carolinehid in New.

0:19:38.440 --> 0:19:40.960
<v Speaker 5>York and I'm Med Lodlo in San Francisco. The Buying

0:19:40.960 --> 0:19:44.760
<v Speaker 5>Administration is toughening auto emission mandates in order to boost

0:19:44.760 --> 0:19:47.920
<v Speaker 5>EV sales. In the near term, there's actually some easing

0:19:48.119 --> 0:19:51.400
<v Speaker 5>in tail pipe requirements, but in the long term it's

0:19:51.480 --> 0:19:53.840
<v Speaker 5>going to be an EPA cat for car and truck

0:19:54.119 --> 0:19:58.760
<v Speaker 5>tailpipe emissions through the model years twenty thirty two. The

0:19:58.880 --> 0:20:02.200
<v Speaker 5>idea is that it will push the automakers, particularly the

0:20:02.280 --> 0:20:05.920
<v Speaker 5>legacy auto makers, to move more quickly in boosting their

0:20:06.000 --> 0:20:08.679
<v Speaker 5>sales of battery electric vehicles. You look at some of

0:20:08.680 --> 0:20:10.800
<v Speaker 5>the names on the board. We have both pure play

0:20:10.840 --> 0:20:14.520
<v Speaker 5>and legacy OEMs on there that are making both combustion

0:20:14.600 --> 0:20:18.399
<v Speaker 5>engine and EV powertrain. Right now, you'd expect that GM

0:20:18.440 --> 0:20:21.480
<v Speaker 5>and Ford, as an example, will now get going more quickly. Caro,

0:20:21.760 --> 0:20:25.320
<v Speaker 5>as I say, biden tailpipe rule coming into a force

0:20:25.480 --> 0:20:28.320
<v Speaker 5>and pushing those EV makers to accelerate their EV timelines.

0:20:28.359 --> 0:20:29.560
<v Speaker 6>This is an interesting that Semashah.

0:20:29.600 --> 0:20:32.040
<v Speaker 3>We just had that conversation about how much regulation and

0:20:32.280 --> 0:20:35.480
<v Speaker 3>US incentives are going to be changing some of the investors'

0:20:35.520 --> 0:20:38.879
<v Speaker 3>mindsets so across chips and cars. Meanwhile, let's just go

0:20:38.960 --> 0:20:40.119
<v Speaker 3>to Microsoft for a moment.

0:20:40.440 --> 0:20:40.800
<v Speaker 6>Get this.

0:20:40.920 --> 0:20:43.479
<v Speaker 3>It's tapped DeepMind co founder and the stuff are Cinnemon

0:20:43.800 --> 0:20:47.320
<v Speaker 3>to head up its consumer artificial intelligence business, basically hiring

0:20:47.359 --> 0:20:50.440
<v Speaker 3>most of the stuff from his Inflection AI startup. As

0:20:50.440 --> 0:20:52.679
<v Speaker 3>a software giant, it's trying to be fending off Google

0:20:52.720 --> 0:20:56.280
<v Speaker 3>in the highly competitive market for AI products, really targeting consumers.

0:20:56.600 --> 0:20:58.879
<v Speaker 3>Joining us now from more bloom Moost Jackie Deavlos, And

0:20:58.920 --> 0:21:02.000
<v Speaker 3>this is so interesting because once again Microsoft getting in

0:21:02.040 --> 0:21:05.239
<v Speaker 3>net with a really fan favorite startup. This one an

0:21:05.240 --> 0:21:08.080
<v Speaker 3>empathetic one when it comes to Chapel, but they're licensing

0:21:08.119 --> 0:21:12.000
<v Speaker 3>the tech of Inflection and taking both well two of

0:21:12.000 --> 0:21:14.399
<v Speaker 3>the three co founders right they already have Reidofman on

0:21:14.400 --> 0:21:14.760
<v Speaker 3>the board.

0:21:16.000 --> 0:21:19.200
<v Speaker 2>It's a really interesting agreement between one of the biggest

0:21:19.240 --> 0:21:22.760
<v Speaker 2>players in AI right now, Microsoft and what was seen

0:21:22.800 --> 0:21:27.639
<v Speaker 2>to be is a really promising AIS startup. Now, both

0:21:27.680 --> 0:21:31.240
<v Speaker 2>companies were pretty careful not to call this an acquisition,

0:21:31.800 --> 0:21:37.560
<v Speaker 2>but nonetheless the agreement effectively has Microsoft absorbing this team

0:21:38.080 --> 0:21:42.199
<v Speaker 2>for them, it means they get to acquire this massive talent.

0:21:42.359 --> 0:21:46.679
<v Speaker 2>Mustafa Suliman, as you mentioned Caroline, comes from Google and

0:21:46.720 --> 0:21:50.480
<v Speaker 2>before that he co founded Deepmine along with Demisisabus. This

0:21:50.640 --> 0:21:54.480
<v Speaker 2>is kind of really pitting these two prominent figures and

0:21:54.600 --> 0:22:00.280
<v Speaker 2>artificial intelligence in these competing roles. Now, for Microsoft, this

0:22:00.359 --> 0:22:02.560
<v Speaker 2>is not just about the talent, but it's also about

0:22:02.600 --> 0:22:06.640
<v Speaker 2>expanding into consumer where you know, they haven't traditionally been

0:22:06.640 --> 0:22:09.159
<v Speaker 2>able to do as well as their enterprise business. So

0:22:09.240 --> 0:22:12.359
<v Speaker 2>this is a fairly large advantage for them for inflection.

0:22:12.520 --> 0:22:14.719
<v Speaker 2>On the other hand, there's still a few questions there

0:22:14.760 --> 0:22:17.040
<v Speaker 2>as to what this means for the company. While yes,

0:22:17.080 --> 0:22:21.000
<v Speaker 2>they get to run their technology on Microsoft's Azure infrastructure,

0:22:21.320 --> 0:22:24.360
<v Speaker 2>what does this mean for investors? The company said yesterday

0:22:24.400 --> 0:22:28.680
<v Speaker 2>that investors will be made whole. Even read Hoffman himself

0:22:28.720 --> 0:22:31.000
<v Speaker 2>posted on LinkedIn saying that it would be a good

0:22:31.040 --> 0:22:34.320
<v Speaker 2>outcome for investors. How and when this will happen is

0:22:34.359 --> 0:22:35.680
<v Speaker 2>still yet to be seen.

0:22:36.840 --> 0:22:39.080
<v Speaker 4>I think there's more than a few questions with this.

0:22:39.359 --> 0:22:41.800
<v Speaker 5>So when we put the story out on social media,

0:22:41.880 --> 0:22:45.240
<v Speaker 5>people start calling in Aqui higher and then this is

0:22:45.280 --> 0:22:47.879
<v Speaker 5>the most bizarre thing about the whole thing. Open Ai

0:22:48.280 --> 0:22:52.840
<v Speaker 5>felt compelled to issue a statement congratulating the stuff on

0:22:52.920 --> 0:22:55.200
<v Speaker 5>his new role, and I think that we spoke to

0:22:55.200 --> 0:22:59.080
<v Speaker 5>in Thedella as well, right Jackie, and he reiterated Microsoft's

0:22:59.080 --> 0:23:02.800
<v Speaker 5>commitment to open up. It's a very complicated situation.

0:23:03.440 --> 0:23:05.359
<v Speaker 2>It really is, because at the end of the day,

0:23:05.520 --> 0:23:10.000
<v Speaker 2>open Ai is a competitor to Inflection in many ways.

0:23:10.000 --> 0:23:12.680
<v Speaker 2>Inflection runs its own chat pot pie, which it said

0:23:12.720 --> 0:23:17.240
<v Speaker 2>it will continue to keep running for how long That's unclear,

0:23:17.480 --> 0:23:19.919
<v Speaker 2>but for what we do know is that Inflection plans

0:23:19.960 --> 0:23:24.240
<v Speaker 2>to focus more on enterprise business. Of course, that's right

0:23:24.320 --> 0:23:27.320
<v Speaker 2>up Microsoft's alley. But at the end of the day,

0:23:27.840 --> 0:23:30.080
<v Speaker 2>you have to kind of wonder how this is also

0:23:30.160 --> 0:23:33.719
<v Speaker 2>going to play out within Microsoft, who's already under some

0:23:33.800 --> 0:23:37.080
<v Speaker 2>pretty intense scrutiny by the FTC here in the US

0:23:37.200 --> 0:23:42.320
<v Speaker 2>about its agreement with open Ai. This might potentially draw

0:23:42.480 --> 0:23:45.000
<v Speaker 2>some more scrutiny, but again, I think we're still waiting

0:23:45.040 --> 0:23:47.399
<v Speaker 2>on some of the details around what this means for

0:23:47.480 --> 0:23:51.359
<v Speaker 2>the rest of the Inflection team. The company didn't say

0:23:51.520 --> 0:23:55.520
<v Speaker 2>exactly how many of inflection seventy employees will be joining over,

0:23:55.840 --> 0:23:58.840
<v Speaker 2>although we do know that another co founder will lead

0:23:59.400 --> 0:24:03.000
<v Speaker 2>It will become chief scientific Officer under this new Microsoft

0:24:03.119 --> 0:24:03.800
<v Speaker 2>AI group.

0:24:05.240 --> 0:24:09.080
<v Speaker 5>Public companies private companies making moves. Another example of a

0:24:09.119 --> 0:24:13.000
<v Speaker 5>public and private company getting closer aligned Blue Most Jack Davolos,

0:24:13.080 --> 0:24:16.320
<v Speaker 5>Trivic Reporting, Thank you AI, Let's stick with it and

0:24:16.400 --> 0:24:19.760
<v Speaker 5>let's stick with private markets is also on ivp's mind.

0:24:19.760 --> 0:24:20.560
<v Speaker 4>The forty four year.

0:24:20.480 --> 0:24:23.840
<v Speaker 5>Old Silicon Valley venture firm wanting to take advantage of

0:24:23.880 --> 0:24:27.919
<v Speaker 5>the great opportunities it sees with this technological shift, and

0:24:27.960 --> 0:24:31.440
<v Speaker 5>it's launching it's eighteenth fund with a one point six

0:24:31.480 --> 0:24:35.840
<v Speaker 5>billion dollar raise. Springing IVP partner Caac Wilhelm for more

0:24:36.119 --> 0:24:39.040
<v Speaker 5>in today's VC Spotlight. Welcome to the studio in San Francisco.

0:24:39.640 --> 0:24:41.560
<v Speaker 5>Let's start with the fund one point six billion.

0:24:42.000 --> 0:24:42.840
<v Speaker 4>Explain it to me.

0:24:42.920 --> 0:24:44.919
<v Speaker 5>What is it going to be used for, what is

0:24:44.920 --> 0:24:47.399
<v Speaker 5>the thematic focus, and how did it come together?

0:24:47.680 --> 0:24:48.160
<v Speaker 6>Absolutely?

0:24:48.240 --> 0:24:50.960
<v Speaker 10>Yeah, So you mentioned one point six billion and eighteenth fund.

0:24:51.040 --> 0:24:53.680
<v Speaker 10>That means, you know, Fund one was back in nineteen

0:24:53.800 --> 0:24:56.679
<v Speaker 10>eighty Fund one was a grand total of twenty two

0:24:56.720 --> 0:24:57.359
<v Speaker 10>million dollars.

0:24:57.400 --> 0:24:59.040
<v Speaker 6>So as you can see, we've come a long way.

0:25:00.040 --> 0:25:00.960
<v Speaker 6>We've invested through.

0:25:00.760 --> 0:25:02.800
<v Speaker 10>Cycles, and I think the key cycle right now is AI.

0:25:03.359 --> 0:25:06.840
<v Speaker 5>But it's a crowded space, a crowded cycle because you

0:25:06.880 --> 0:25:10.040
<v Speaker 5>not only have the like, well one point thing's been

0:25:10.040 --> 0:25:12.320
<v Speaker 5>in early stage or so it's a good question.

0:25:12.359 --> 0:25:14.639
<v Speaker 10>You know, venture means many things, so many people ventures

0:25:14.680 --> 0:25:16.080
<v Speaker 10>everything from you know pre.

0:25:16.000 --> 0:25:17.840
<v Speaker 6>Seed and seed all the way to pre IPO.

0:25:18.280 --> 0:25:20.879
<v Speaker 10>We are squarely in the sort of super growth phase.

0:25:20.960 --> 0:25:22.760
<v Speaker 10>So you're raising a Series B in a Series C,

0:25:23.000 --> 0:25:25.600
<v Speaker 10>you have early data. We believe in you, your team

0:25:25.640 --> 0:25:27.600
<v Speaker 10>and your market, and that's where we're trying to hone

0:25:27.600 --> 0:25:30.760
<v Speaker 10>in interesting in venture. You know, lots of people have

0:25:30.840 --> 0:25:33.639
<v Speaker 10>moved to a platform model, so everything to everyone. We

0:25:33.720 --> 0:25:36.520
<v Speaker 10>have consistently over eighteen funds, we've been really focused on

0:25:36.560 --> 0:25:38.200
<v Speaker 10>doing this one stage in this one stage way.

0:25:38.240 --> 0:25:39.800
<v Speaker 5>How I didn't mean to lose my train of thought there,

0:25:39.840 --> 0:25:42.520
<v Speaker 5>but I was just reflecting, having been at GtC, that

0:25:42.600 --> 0:25:44.639
<v Speaker 5>this is a space where it's not just venture firms

0:25:44.720 --> 0:25:48.280
<v Speaker 5>jumping in. You have strategic investors like in video as well.

0:25:48.600 --> 0:25:50.560
<v Speaker 5>There's a lot of people putting capital to play.

0:25:50.720 --> 0:25:52.080
<v Speaker 6>Yeah, it's super competitive.

0:25:52.200 --> 0:25:55.600
<v Speaker 3>And for that instance, when you're trying to therefore woo

0:25:55.640 --> 0:25:59.240
<v Speaker 3>in this new era of founders and ensure that you're

0:25:59.280 --> 0:26:01.520
<v Speaker 3>managing to write the write checks rather than well, the

0:26:01.560 --> 0:26:04.439
<v Speaker 3>corporate vcs at the same time, CAAC, I'm assuming some

0:26:04.520 --> 0:26:07.080
<v Speaker 3>of the past precedents really win out. I think of

0:26:07.119 --> 0:26:09.000
<v Speaker 3>some of the exits that you've had Data Dog here

0:26:09.000 --> 0:26:11.440
<v Speaker 3>in New York. I think of Klana coming up. I mean,

0:26:11.480 --> 0:26:14.320
<v Speaker 3>how much does that track record help show that you

0:26:14.359 --> 0:26:17.400
<v Speaker 3>should be as part of that winning team for them?

0:26:17.720 --> 0:26:19.840
<v Speaker 10>Yeah, exactly. I mean I think longevity really helps. I

0:26:19.840 --> 0:26:22.000
<v Speaker 10>think brand matters and venture capital. So I think the

0:26:22.040 --> 0:26:24.960
<v Speaker 10>brand of IVP means something we wanted to mean, substance

0:26:25.000 --> 0:26:27.320
<v Speaker 10>and soul. We wanted to mean that warrior partner. We're

0:26:27.359 --> 0:26:28.560
<v Speaker 10>going to lead the round and we're going to be

0:26:28.560 --> 0:26:31.320
<v Speaker 10>with you for a long time. Take for example, Perplexity,

0:26:31.400 --> 0:26:33.480
<v Speaker 10>which is sort of akin to you know, Consumer AI

0:26:33.600 --> 0:26:36.040
<v Speaker 10>at the moment, and then Zekeeist and that's one where

0:26:36.080 --> 0:26:38.840
<v Speaker 10>we you know, hard fought battle for the Series B

0:26:39.119 --> 0:26:40.760
<v Speaker 10>and we were competitive and we won.

0:26:41.960 --> 0:26:45.280
<v Speaker 3>What do you make there for of inflection going with

0:26:45.320 --> 0:26:48.959
<v Speaker 3>Microsoft and a future of Perplexity. I mean, it feels

0:26:49.040 --> 0:26:52.480
<v Speaker 3>as though the big tech companies are not only writing

0:26:52.520 --> 0:26:55.400
<v Speaker 3>with their vcs, but they're also making these very extraordinary

0:26:55.400 --> 0:26:57.080
<v Speaker 3>partnerships that end up feeling.

0:26:56.800 --> 0:26:57.240
<v Speaker 6>Like M and A.

0:26:59.119 --> 0:27:01.720
<v Speaker 10>Yeah, I mean on this one you guys were discussing earlier.

0:27:01.760 --> 0:27:04.040
<v Speaker 10>I would like this inflection deal does sort of like

0:27:04.080 --> 0:27:06.320
<v Speaker 10>smells like an acquisition, looks like an acquisition. I think

0:27:06.359 --> 0:27:08.840
<v Speaker 10>everyone's focused on the CEO and his his move and

0:27:08.880 --> 0:27:11.520
<v Speaker 10>his role and Microsoft. But I think this does sound

0:27:11.560 --> 0:27:13.480
<v Speaker 10>and smell more like an acquisition than it does anything

0:27:13.480 --> 0:27:13.919
<v Speaker 10>else to me.

0:27:14.680 --> 0:27:16.080
<v Speaker 6>I mean, I think what it does is, you.

0:27:16.000 --> 0:27:19.080
<v Speaker 10>Know, from the perspective of a perplexity for example, very

0:27:19.080 --> 0:27:23.280
<v Speaker 10>focused on Google and their positioning visa be Google. I

0:27:23.280 --> 0:27:27.280
<v Speaker 10>think Microsoft historically conventionally has been very much an enterprise business.

0:27:27.440 --> 0:27:30.560
<v Speaker 10>So I think what this does is this puts Microsoft

0:27:30.600 --> 0:27:32.800
<v Speaker 10>consumer on the map in a way that maybe people

0:27:32.840 --> 0:27:34.200
<v Speaker 10>hadn't appreciated more recently.

0:27:34.960 --> 0:27:38.800
<v Speaker 3>Thinking of consumer, I'm thinking of you know, Klana for example,

0:27:39.000 --> 0:27:42.479
<v Speaker 3>as one of those companies that is very consumer facing,

0:27:42.600 --> 0:27:45.000
<v Speaker 3>is looking at tapping the markets itself. We today are

0:27:45.080 --> 0:27:48.520
<v Speaker 3>anticipating a non consumer business a Steri Labs coming to

0:27:48.560 --> 0:27:50.760
<v Speaker 3>the market. It looks as though it's going to price well,

0:27:50.800 --> 0:27:53.000
<v Speaker 3>it's going to start trading well above where at priced

0:27:53.000 --> 0:27:55.040
<v Speaker 3>we got Reddit tomorrow. How do you feel about the

0:27:55.080 --> 0:27:57.600
<v Speaker 3>exits at the moment, not only just big joint ventures,

0:27:57.640 --> 0:27:58.920
<v Speaker 3>but the public markets.

0:28:00.480 --> 0:28:02.800
<v Speaker 10>I'd say we're cautiously optimistic. I mean, if you think

0:28:03.000 --> 0:28:05.760
<v Speaker 10>look back on history, look at twenty twenty one for IVP,

0:28:05.880 --> 0:28:09.040
<v Speaker 10>we had fifteen IPOs in that single year. That's of

0:28:09.080 --> 0:28:12.119
<v Speaker 10>one hundred and thirty total over we discussed since nineteen eighty.

0:28:12.920 --> 0:28:15.359
<v Speaker 10>So those heyday you know, that heyday we all lived at.

0:28:15.600 --> 0:28:17.680
<v Speaker 10>You know, maybe we want to go back, but those

0:28:17.760 --> 0:28:20.400
<v Speaker 10>days are probably over for the next you know, ensuing years.

0:28:20.440 --> 0:28:23.000
<v Speaker 10>I think again, we're cautiously optimistic for this year. We

0:28:23.000 --> 0:28:24.720
<v Speaker 10>don't think it's going to be more like twenty twenty one.

0:28:24.760 --> 0:28:28.120
<v Speaker 10>But you know, Reddit and these others suggest that there

0:28:28.160 --> 0:28:30.920
<v Speaker 10>are companies in the wings that want to get out.

0:28:31.359 --> 0:28:34.080
<v Speaker 5>I'm interested in where the one point six billion is

0:28:34.119 --> 0:28:38.480
<v Speaker 5>coming from in the context of exits, but also the competition.

0:28:39.080 --> 0:28:41.680
<v Speaker 5>We are obsessed with the FED because we're Bloomberg and

0:28:41.680 --> 0:28:44.320
<v Speaker 5>that's all we talk about. But who would be an

0:28:44.440 --> 0:28:46.720
<v Speaker 5>LP right now in a venture firm like like yours.

0:28:46.760 --> 0:28:48.840
<v Speaker 5>Are they kicking down your door and saying I want

0:28:48.880 --> 0:28:51.680
<v Speaker 5>on that fund or was it difficult to bring the

0:28:51.720 --> 0:28:52.280
<v Speaker 5>fund together?

0:28:52.560 --> 0:28:53.400
<v Speaker 6>Yeah, a little bit of both.

0:28:53.440 --> 0:28:55.000
<v Speaker 10>I mean, we started in nineteen eighty and so we

0:28:55.040 --> 0:28:57.000
<v Speaker 10>have an investor base money of whom we've been with

0:28:57.080 --> 0:28:59.360
<v Speaker 10>us since nineteen eighty. You know that is a makeup

0:28:59.400 --> 0:29:03.480
<v Speaker 10>of a lot of US in Europe sort of mainstream LPs.

0:29:03.600 --> 0:29:05.720
<v Speaker 10>That being said, if you had taken a pulse check

0:29:05.760 --> 0:29:08.840
<v Speaker 10>with me six months ago, five months ago, four months ago,

0:29:08.840 --> 0:29:11.520
<v Speaker 10>I would have had different answers for you. It wasn't straightforward.

0:29:11.560 --> 0:29:13.160
<v Speaker 10>I think you guys know as well as we do.

0:29:13.280 --> 0:29:17.960
<v Speaker 10>Like it's been a tumultuous several years and the liquidity constraints,

0:29:18.000 --> 0:29:22.680
<v Speaker 10>the optimism of our investor base has really varied over time.

0:29:23.200 --> 0:29:26.160
<v Speaker 3>One of seven GPS over their IVP of course oldest

0:29:26.200 --> 0:29:27.880
<v Speaker 3>one on the black block when it comes to Slickon

0:29:27.920 --> 0:29:30.400
<v Speaker 3>Valley and cac. But you need to get into your

0:29:30.440 --> 0:29:33.640
<v Speaker 3>running prowess and how that's all going. IVP partner CAQ Wilhelm,

0:29:33.680 --> 0:29:35.080
<v Speaker 3>We thank you so much for coming on and talk

0:29:35.080 --> 0:29:36.880
<v Speaker 3>about the new fun. Meanwhile, coming up, we've got to

0:29:36.880 --> 0:29:39.760
<v Speaker 3>get into the IPO. We're just mentioning Asta Labs. It's

0:29:39.800 --> 0:29:43.680
<v Speaker 3>about to go start moving on the Nasdak it priced

0:29:43.920 --> 0:29:45.720
<v Speaker 3>now we're going to see where it starts to trade.

0:29:46.360 --> 0:29:48.080
<v Speaker 6>CEO Ja Tendra Mohun's joining us.

0:29:48.280 --> 0:29:50.120
<v Speaker 5>Ed what if you got I want to go back

0:29:50.160 --> 0:29:52.480
<v Speaker 5>to those kind of legacy automaker and EV names we

0:29:52.560 --> 0:29:52.960
<v Speaker 5>were watching.

0:29:53.040 --> 0:29:54.800
<v Speaker 4>The Biden administration is bringing in.

0:29:54.680 --> 0:29:59.160
<v Speaker 5>Tougher tailpipe rules effective or caps through model year twenty

0:29:59.200 --> 0:30:02.240
<v Speaker 5>thirty two. The we ease the short term requirements, but

0:30:02.320 --> 0:30:05.880
<v Speaker 5>the idea is make long term tail pipe emissions regulations tougher.

0:30:05.960 --> 0:30:08.720
<v Speaker 5>Now to get some of those names like GM and

0:30:08.800 --> 0:30:12.560
<v Speaker 5>Ford to move more quickly on transitioning to battery electric.

0:30:12.760 --> 0:30:15.320
<v Speaker 5>There wasn't really a knee joke reaction in the moves

0:30:15.320 --> 0:30:17.400
<v Speaker 5>of these names. We do see some of them higher

0:30:17.680 --> 0:30:19.880
<v Speaker 5>Rivian soft to one point three percent, but Rivian has

0:30:19.880 --> 0:30:22.640
<v Speaker 5>got all kinds of problems right now, which we will

0:30:22.640 --> 0:30:23.960
<v Speaker 5>continue to report on.

0:30:24.160 --> 0:30:33.920
<v Speaker 4>This is Bloomberg technology.

0:30:39.560 --> 0:30:41.560
<v Speaker 3>We've got to talk IPOs, We've got to talk the

0:30:41.600 --> 0:30:45.040
<v Speaker 3>listing day over stra Labs, which provides purpose built connectivity

0:30:45.040 --> 0:30:48.440
<v Speaker 3>solutions basically for artificial intelligence and for cloud infrastructure.

0:30:48.760 --> 0:30:51.040
<v Speaker 6>Company will soon be busy trading on the.

0:30:51.080 --> 0:30:55.160
<v Speaker 12>Nasdack and of the ticket symbol alab A Lab here

0:30:55.160 --> 0:30:58.880
<v Speaker 12>for more as the Estera Lab CEO Tendra Mahanjatendra, you

0:30:59.000 --> 0:31:01.440
<v Speaker 12>own what about six percent of a company that's going

0:31:01.480 --> 0:31:03.040
<v Speaker 12>to rock it to more than about a ten million

0:31:03.080 --> 0:31:03.800
<v Speaker 12>dollar valuation.

0:31:03.840 --> 0:31:04.440
<v Speaker 6>How do you feel?

0:31:05.680 --> 0:31:09.480
<v Speaker 13>Feels great, feels awesome. It's not about me, though, it's

0:31:09.640 --> 0:31:11.600
<v Speaker 13>if you think about Esthera, It's really all about the

0:31:11.600 --> 0:31:14.320
<v Speaker 13>people who have helped us get to this valuation, and

0:31:14.400 --> 0:31:16.360
<v Speaker 13>it's the people who are going to push us to

0:31:16.760 --> 0:31:18.960
<v Speaker 13>new heights. So very excited.

0:31:18.640 --> 0:31:22.280
<v Speaker 5>About today to Tendrey, Good morning from San Francisco, and

0:31:22.360 --> 0:31:24.480
<v Speaker 5>sorry to interrupts you. Just a few minutes before you

0:31:24.600 --> 0:31:28.440
<v Speaker 5>joined us on the program, Bloomberg reported that your stock

0:31:28.520 --> 0:31:31.760
<v Speaker 5>is indicated to open at fifty two dollars fifty six

0:31:31.760 --> 0:31:36.440
<v Speaker 5>cents a share. That's a forty six percent premium on where.

0:31:36.200 --> 0:31:39.080
<v Speaker 4>The IPO price. What's your reaction to that?

0:31:40.360 --> 0:31:43.040
<v Speaker 13>Thanks, stock market prices are something that we should be

0:31:43.040 --> 0:31:46.200
<v Speaker 13>aware of, but not let them drive us. It's my philosophy.

0:31:46.560 --> 0:31:49.320
<v Speaker 13>I think it's an indication of the confidence that our

0:31:50.320 --> 0:31:53.800
<v Speaker 13>investors are placing in us. So we are very, very glad.

0:31:53.880 --> 0:31:56.880
<v Speaker 13>We have a lot of gratitude for them. But we'll

0:31:56.960 --> 0:32:00.000
<v Speaker 13>keep our heads down, continue executing, continue building products.

0:32:00.440 --> 0:32:02.720
<v Speaker 3>And let's talk about that execution that's driven your revenue

0:32:02.760 --> 0:32:05.640
<v Speaker 3>to last year one hundred and sixteen million dollars, almost

0:32:05.680 --> 0:32:08.320
<v Speaker 3>doubling but you're still got a net loss of twenty

0:32:08.320 --> 0:32:10.720
<v Speaker 3>six million dollars when you think you will be able

0:32:10.760 --> 0:32:13.440
<v Speaker 3>to provide that profitability that so many investors want to see.

0:32:14.160 --> 0:32:17.320
<v Speaker 13>So we declared that the last quarter we were indeed profitable.

0:32:18.200 --> 0:32:21.080
<v Speaker 13>A focus for ester Labs from the inception has been

0:32:21.120 --> 0:32:23.640
<v Speaker 13>to build a strong business, one that can stand on

0:32:23.720 --> 0:32:27.040
<v Speaker 13>its own to feet without external support, and that's what

0:32:27.080 --> 0:32:29.280
<v Speaker 13>we've been doing for the last six years. We turned

0:32:29.320 --> 0:32:32.520
<v Speaker 13>in a profitable quarter last quarter, and we will continue

0:32:32.560 --> 0:32:35.320
<v Speaker 13>to drive our business forward in the coming quarters and

0:32:35.440 --> 0:32:36.000
<v Speaker 13>years to come.

0:32:37.360 --> 0:32:40.719
<v Speaker 5>Jitendra, there were no fewer than two hundred and seventy

0:32:40.720 --> 0:32:44.000
<v Speaker 5>one mentions of the word AI in your most recent

0:32:44.160 --> 0:32:47.360
<v Speaker 5>SEC filing before this morning, and I think it's worth

0:32:47.360 --> 0:32:49.680
<v Speaker 5>discussing what a stera actually does. Right, You make the

0:32:49.720 --> 0:32:53.200
<v Speaker 5>hardware or the chip that allows for the high speed

0:32:53.200 --> 0:32:56.240
<v Speaker 5>connection between different parts of the server rack war as

0:32:56.320 --> 0:32:59.280
<v Speaker 5>is now more commonplace to call it the computer the

0:32:59.320 --> 0:33:02.959
<v Speaker 5>compute plant form. How are you actually benefiting in the

0:33:03.000 --> 0:33:06.240
<v Speaker 5>real world from this AI infrastructure build out that we're

0:33:06.280 --> 0:33:07.320
<v Speaker 5>seeing before our eyes.

0:33:08.080 --> 0:33:10.479
<v Speaker 13>Yeah, that's a great question, and let me give you

0:33:11.000 --> 0:33:14.440
<v Speaker 13>a little background. So whenever you enter a querry into

0:33:14.600 --> 0:33:17.920
<v Speaker 13>a chat GPT or you look for a recommendation coming

0:33:17.960 --> 0:33:21.080
<v Speaker 13>from Netflix or Amazon. What happens in the back is

0:33:21.120 --> 0:33:24.840
<v Speaker 13>in a data center, thousands, hundreds of thousands of computers

0:33:25.080 --> 0:33:28.080
<v Speaker 13>you know, many times based on GPUs come into action

0:33:28.280 --> 0:33:30.479
<v Speaker 13>and they talk to each other very very rapidly, at

0:33:30.600 --> 0:33:32.959
<v Speaker 13>very very high rates. And in fact, the rates are

0:33:32.960 --> 0:33:34.920
<v Speaker 13>so much that they are not able to talk very

0:33:34.920 --> 0:33:37.600
<v Speaker 13>well together. And that's where our products come in. We

0:33:37.800 --> 0:33:40.880
<v Speaker 13>enable the CPUs and GPUs to talk to each other.

0:33:41.320 --> 0:33:43.960
<v Speaker 13>A great analogy might be one of running a race.

0:33:44.320 --> 0:33:46.400
<v Speaker 13>If you want to run really fast, you will get tired,

0:33:46.800 --> 0:33:48.720
<v Speaker 13>and so you run a really race. You start from

0:33:49.120 --> 0:33:51.440
<v Speaker 13>one point, you run very fast, passy button onto the

0:33:51.440 --> 0:33:55.440
<v Speaker 13>next guy, and continue forward. That's what our products do.

0:33:55.440 --> 0:33:57.880
<v Speaker 13>They enable all of these brains that are behind AI

0:33:58.240 --> 0:34:00.680
<v Speaker 13>to talk to each other very fast and reliably.

0:34:01.600 --> 0:34:03.880
<v Speaker 3>Briefly, you've raised seven hundred and thirty million dollars. What

0:34:03.920 --> 0:34:04.440
<v Speaker 3>are you doing with it?

0:34:04.480 --> 0:34:04.920
<v Speaker 6>Chatandra?

0:34:06.600 --> 0:34:09.279
<v Speaker 13>We have so much opportunity in front of us. We

0:34:09.320 --> 0:34:11.920
<v Speaker 13>are in a very unique position where our customers are

0:34:11.920 --> 0:34:14.439
<v Speaker 13>coming to us and telling us, build me this, build

0:34:14.440 --> 0:34:16.520
<v Speaker 13>me this. You guys are good at semiconductors. You can

0:34:16.560 --> 0:34:19.920
<v Speaker 13>build hardware you can do software. We've earned a trusted

0:34:19.920 --> 0:34:23.880
<v Speaker 13>advisors status with our customers and so much opportunity in

0:34:23.920 --> 0:34:26.000
<v Speaker 13>front of us, so we will use this money to

0:34:26.520 --> 0:34:30.760
<v Speaker 13>really accelerate the product development that we've done, hire more people.

0:34:31.160 --> 0:34:33.359
<v Speaker 13>If you're watching this and you're looking for a job

0:34:33.400 --> 0:34:34.680
<v Speaker 13>at Estera Labs, please.

0:34:34.480 --> 0:34:38.880
<v Speaker 5>Apply Sarah Labs CEO to Bendromo and great to have

0:34:38.960 --> 0:34:51.040
<v Speaker 5>you on the program. After Hollywood filmmaker George Lucas showed

0:34:51.080 --> 0:34:54.640
<v Speaker 5>support for Disney CEO Bob iger in his proxy battle

0:34:54.680 --> 0:34:58.239
<v Speaker 5>of activist investors, let's get the take of Gerber Kawasaki

0:34:58.280 --> 0:35:00.880
<v Speaker 5>CEO and President Ros Gerber, who's point posting on x

0:35:01.120 --> 0:35:04.160
<v Speaker 5>that Nelson Peltz quote does not know his way around

0:35:04.160 --> 0:35:08.040
<v Speaker 5>Hollywood or anything related to the entertainment industry.

0:35:08.880 --> 0:35:10.440
<v Speaker 4>Ross is here with us on the program.

0:35:10.520 --> 0:35:13.040
<v Speaker 5>So I guess the latest piece of news is what

0:35:13.080 --> 0:35:19.759
<v Speaker 5>we reported on Tuesday that George Lucas, who sold his

0:35:20.719 --> 0:35:24.239
<v Speaker 5>production house to Disney for stock, is coming out and

0:35:24.280 --> 0:35:25.279
<v Speaker 5>saying Bob's the man.

0:35:25.480 --> 0:35:26.840
<v Speaker 4>Does that carry weight for you?

0:35:28.920 --> 0:35:31.400
<v Speaker 1>I mean, George Lucas is like one of the geniuses

0:35:31.440 --> 0:35:34.399
<v Speaker 1>of Hollywood, and Bob Igrew, who you know, I've met

0:35:34.440 --> 0:35:37.279
<v Speaker 1>and talked to many times, is like one of the

0:35:37.280 --> 0:35:41.520
<v Speaker 1>best CEOs in like America or maybe the world, but

0:35:41.760 --> 0:35:45.480
<v Speaker 1>also one of the best CEOs in Hollywood. And like

0:35:45.760 --> 0:35:50.880
<v Speaker 1>getting this deal yesterday with ESPN in college sports, getting

0:35:50.920 --> 0:35:53.480
<v Speaker 1>Taylor Swift on the platform. You know, these are the

0:35:53.880 --> 0:35:56.400
<v Speaker 1>Bob Iger effect that people like Nelson Peltz who just

0:35:56.440 --> 0:35:59.200
<v Speaker 1>like do financials he should worry about Ben and Jerry's

0:35:59.520 --> 0:36:03.200
<v Speaker 1>and New Believer versus getting involved with companies like Disney

0:36:03.200 --> 0:36:07.719
<v Speaker 1>and Hollywood, which are really really hard to understand how

0:36:07.760 --> 0:36:10.319
<v Speaker 1>to make money in Hollywood, very very few people ever

0:36:10.400 --> 0:36:12.880
<v Speaker 1>have and Bob Iver is one of them. So so

0:36:12.920 --> 0:36:15.080
<v Speaker 1>we support him one hundred percent. He's a great person,

0:36:15.480 --> 0:36:18.640
<v Speaker 1>a great leader, and George Lucas as well, one of

0:36:18.680 --> 0:36:22.960
<v Speaker 1>the great creators of our time. Basically everybody supports Eiger

0:36:23.000 --> 0:36:24.160
<v Speaker 1>except Pelts.

0:36:24.600 --> 0:36:27.719
<v Speaker 3>And his former CFO, who would have known how to

0:36:27.719 --> 0:36:29.080
<v Speaker 3>make money in Hollywood before.

0:36:30.040 --> 0:36:33.040
<v Speaker 1>And I'm actually okay with replacing one of the board

0:36:33.080 --> 0:36:37.680
<v Speaker 1>members with Joe Rossulo, especially somebody like Mary Barrow who

0:36:37.680 --> 0:36:39.480
<v Speaker 1>has no reason to be on the board of directors

0:36:39.480 --> 0:36:42.560
<v Speaker 1>at Tesla. So like, I don't think it's a horrible

0:36:42.560 --> 0:36:46.160
<v Speaker 1>thing to have one board member switched for one of

0:36:46.200 --> 0:36:50.279
<v Speaker 1>their picks, especially Joe. But like in general, Disney's doing

0:36:50.320 --> 0:36:51.960
<v Speaker 1>well right now and they're doing everything they need to

0:36:51.960 --> 0:36:52.800
<v Speaker 1>do to fix the business.

0:36:53.440 --> 0:36:55.719
<v Speaker 5>Because real quick, I think you said Tesla, but did

0:36:55.760 --> 0:37:00.600
<v Speaker 5>you mean you meant Disney Disney. Yeah, I'm sorry, Elon's

0:37:00.600 --> 0:37:01.680
<v Speaker 5>on your mind a lot at the moment.

0:37:01.960 --> 0:37:02.440
<v Speaker 4>I get it.

0:37:02.560 --> 0:37:05.799
<v Speaker 5>Yeah, let's let's not go there, us.

0:37:06.040 --> 0:37:08.040
<v Speaker 4>Let let's let's not go there. Let's stick with Disney.

0:37:08.800 --> 0:37:11.799
<v Speaker 5>We're speaking so much about a proxy fight and an

0:37:11.840 --> 0:37:14.719
<v Speaker 5>activist investor battle that actually, I don't think we've got

0:37:14.719 --> 0:37:17.280
<v Speaker 5>any real good sense on how things are going at Disney.

0:37:17.560 --> 0:37:20.960
<v Speaker 5>Because the accusation from those that want change, like Nelson Peltz,

0:37:21.160 --> 0:37:23.480
<v Speaker 5>is it's not going very well, right, That's why they

0:37:23.480 --> 0:37:26.839
<v Speaker 5>want change. But what do you feel about the performance

0:37:26.880 --> 0:37:30.120
<v Speaker 5>of disney streaming business. It's studios and it's parks.

0:37:31.120 --> 0:37:33.000
<v Speaker 1>Well, that's not the vibe I'm getting. You know, I

0:37:33.360 --> 0:37:35.799
<v Speaker 1>live here in Hollywood, and you know I have deep

0:37:35.800 --> 0:37:39.520
<v Speaker 1>connections through the entertainment industry. You know, Disney and Hollywood

0:37:39.600 --> 0:37:42.239
<v Speaker 1>is going through a major retrenchment now on what they're

0:37:42.280 --> 0:37:44.680
<v Speaker 1>spending on streaming and what they're spending on shows and

0:37:45.080 --> 0:37:48.279
<v Speaker 1>what content's being made, and it's not just Disney, It's

0:37:48.280 --> 0:37:50.560
<v Speaker 1>it's Netflix and many of the other players are really

0:37:50.600 --> 0:37:53.640
<v Speaker 1>looking at profitability now and with the ad support and

0:37:53.680 --> 0:37:57.120
<v Speaker 1>streaming services. But but Disney streaming services do we just fine?

0:37:57.200 --> 0:37:57.360
<v Speaker 5>You know?

0:37:57.440 --> 0:37:59.640
<v Speaker 1>Showgun is a great show, so the number one show

0:37:59.640 --> 0:38:03.160
<v Speaker 1>out there if you haven't seen it, amazing show. They've

0:38:03.160 --> 0:38:07.080
<v Speaker 1>got Taylor Swift on the platform, you know. So Disney

0:38:07.080 --> 0:38:09.560
<v Speaker 1>Plus is doing well. ESPN is making all the right

0:38:09.640 --> 0:38:11.879
<v Speaker 1>moves they need to make to move into the next

0:38:11.880 --> 0:38:15.319
<v Speaker 1>stage for its growth, and parks and resorts is great

0:38:15.360 --> 0:38:17.280
<v Speaker 1>as well. They just need to make some good movies.

0:38:17.320 --> 0:38:19.960
<v Speaker 1>That's the only thing. And the best person to make

0:38:20.040 --> 0:38:23.640
<v Speaker 1>good movies is Iiger and his team. There's nobody else

0:38:24.080 --> 0:38:25.279
<v Speaker 1>that I would trust doing that.

0:38:26.040 --> 0:38:28.960
<v Speaker 3>Well, they can just license Area's Tour, which got four

0:38:28.960 --> 0:38:31.600
<v Speaker 3>point six million views on Disney Plus apparently in its

0:38:31.640 --> 0:38:32.280
<v Speaker 3>first weekend.

0:38:32.719 --> 0:38:34.520
<v Speaker 6>So go with the hits.

0:38:34.560 --> 0:38:38.359
<v Speaker 3>But Ross, I am interested in the successor eventually. As

0:38:38.440 --> 0:38:39.960
<v Speaker 3>much as you love Bob Iger, he's got to go

0:38:39.960 --> 0:38:40.879
<v Speaker 3>in twenty twenty six.

0:38:40.920 --> 0:38:41.440
<v Speaker 6>Who do you like?

0:38:43.200 --> 0:38:46.480
<v Speaker 1>Well, you know, the truth of the matter is, I've

0:38:46.520 --> 0:38:50.360
<v Speaker 1>been around since the Eisner era, so until he's actually gone.

0:38:50.400 --> 0:38:53.160
<v Speaker 1>I don't know. I don't know if I believe somebody's

0:38:53.200 --> 0:38:55.840
<v Speaker 1>replacing him, because you know, Bob Iger's in phenomenal shape,

0:38:55.840 --> 0:38:58.480
<v Speaker 1>and you know, if Joe Biden's running for president, certainly

0:38:58.520 --> 0:39:01.799
<v Speaker 1>Bob Iger can run Disney for another ten years. But

0:39:01.920 --> 0:39:06.480
<v Speaker 1>that said, you know, I'm really really partial to you know,

0:39:06.640 --> 0:39:09.239
<v Speaker 1>some of the teams that have worked with them in

0:39:09.280 --> 0:39:12.040
<v Speaker 1>the past, and and you know, especially people who've worked

0:39:12.080 --> 0:39:15.200
<v Speaker 1>on Disney Plus and some of the other things. So

0:39:15.600 --> 0:39:18.640
<v Speaker 1>there are many executives that they're talking to, you know

0:39:18.960 --> 0:39:21.680
<v Speaker 1>that I have a lot of faith in that could

0:39:21.760 --> 0:39:24.480
<v Speaker 1>replace them, But I still think it's really up for grabs,

0:39:24.480 --> 0:39:27.480
<v Speaker 1>and right now I'm happy i Iber is still there,

0:39:27.640 --> 0:39:27.879
<v Speaker 1>you know.

0:39:28.520 --> 0:39:31.839
<v Speaker 3>Goba Kawasaki, CEO, President ros Gerber always great to catch

0:39:31.920 --> 0:39:35.359
<v Speaker 3>up with you. Thank you so much for Meanwhile, Well

0:39:35.440 --> 0:39:37.480
<v Speaker 3>that does it for this edition of Bloomberg Technology.

0:39:37.520 --> 0:39:38.560
<v Speaker 6>Boy, what a busy show.

0:39:38.680 --> 0:39:38.719
<v Speaker 7>Ed.

0:39:39.440 --> 0:39:41.640
<v Speaker 5>Yeah, it's interesting how there is this kind of little

0:39:41.800 --> 0:39:45.880
<v Speaker 5>IPO euphoria window of the next twenty four hours recap

0:39:45.920 --> 0:39:49.920
<v Speaker 5>the ASTERA conversation in particular on the pod Apple Spotify.

0:39:50.000 --> 0:39:51.600
<v Speaker 4>iHeart the Bloomberg platforms.

0:39:51.760 --> 0:39:53.279
<v Speaker 5>So many of you are checking out the pod on

0:39:53.320 --> 0:39:55.239
<v Speaker 5>your way to work, or when you're on the treadmill,

0:39:55.400 --> 0:39:58.760
<v Speaker 5>whatever it is. Tune in daily from New York and SF.

0:39:58.960 --> 0:40:00.000
<v Speaker 5>This is Bloomberg Technology.

0:40:00.080 --> 0:40:01.920
<v Speaker 4>James wol