Speaker 1: Welcome to Stuff. You should know a production of My
Speaker 1: Heart Radios How Stuff Works. Hey, and welcome to the podcast.
Speaker 1: I'm Josh Clark. There's Charles W Chuck Bryan over there,
Speaker 1: and uh, it's just the two of us again. But
Speaker 1: I'm getting used to it. How about you? I am.
Speaker 1: I am sweating in our studio by myself, Like you're
Speaker 1: nervous now. I'm hot because the studio is hot and
Speaker 1: you know, I know we've been buzz marketing enough, but
Speaker 1: the internet is only working in our studio for some reason.
Speaker 1: And uh, I ate some of that spicy beef ramen
Speaker 1: in this hot room. Yeah, that's a dangerous combo. I
Speaker 1: didn't think to open the door, So I'm just like
Speaker 1: sitting here pouring sweat out everywhere. Well here's the thing.
Speaker 1: You could go totally dong out like Spartacus if you
Speaker 1: wanted to, because you're the only one there. People have
Speaker 1: been talking about dong out lately. To the movie crush page. Yeah,
Speaker 1: well it's a pretty hilarious term. But just please put down,
Speaker 1: like some newspaper or something on the chair before you
Speaker 1: sit on the bare bottomed Okay. Oh, and by the way,
Speaker 1: speaking of movie crush, you. I think this is going
Speaker 1: to come out the day after your movie Crush Mini
Speaker 1: Crush appearance next week. Yeah, I'm excited about it. Man,
Speaker 1: I'm a little nervous. So No, it's gonna be great.
Speaker 1: People are gonna love it. So if you don't listen
Speaker 1: to the show, maybe listen to this one episode and
Speaker 1: then forget about the show again. If you want always
Speaker 1: stick around, maybe boost the numbers a tad. But it
Speaker 1: was a lot of fun, and I think I think
Speaker 1: people would want to hear your appearances. What I really
Speaker 1: appreciated you having me on it was it was a
Speaker 1: lot of fun. It was fun professional at hosting. Hey,
Speaker 1: we turns out we know what we're doing here, don't
Speaker 1: we don't? Uh? Speaking of which, I think we should
Speaker 1: frontload this episode with a little bit of a c
Speaker 1: o A Um. If you are a pretty hard line
Speaker 1: anti vaxer, or if you believe in things like planned
Speaker 1: demmi or that Bill Gates created the coronavirus for population control,
Speaker 1: you may not want to listen to this because we're
Speaker 1: gonna bring you hard and leaned facts, lean and mean,
Speaker 1: depending on your point of view. I think that's a
Speaker 1: good It's a good c O a. I think that
Speaker 1: maybe you got rid of two of the hate mail
Speaker 1: we're gonna get, so thank you for that. Yeah, we'll see.
Speaker 1: I mean I think, uh, it just bears saying, just why, why,
Speaker 1: why rile yourself all up? Just let's listen to your
Speaker 1: echo chamber podcasts that validate what you think maybe or
Speaker 1: or or or or calm down and just hear us
Speaker 1: out and see what you think. Well, that's always a
Speaker 1: you know, it's always an option. You know. So we're
Speaker 1: not even talking necessarily just about vaccines or anti vaccines. Um,
Speaker 1: it's almost like a side thing to this whole thing,
Speaker 1: but it's definitely still, um, very much intertwined with it. Um,
Speaker 1: we're talking about her can't or you can't not talk
Speaker 1: about vaccines if you're going to talk about her immunity
Speaker 1: right now, because with with her immunity, especially in the
Speaker 1: twenty one century, there's basically two ways of getting there,
Speaker 1: and one of them is a robust vaccination program. That's right.
Speaker 1: And if you don't know what her immunity is, then um,
Speaker 1: then you're probably just fine. You've been living under a
Speaker 1: rock and you're not near any other humans or the internet.
Speaker 1: You're still protected though that's right. Herd immunity those the
Speaker 1: principle uh, sort of in its simplest form of safety
Speaker 1: and numbers and if you have a lot of people
Speaker 1: or enough people, because there's actual math involved to figuring
Speaker 1: that out. It's not just a guess. If you have
Speaker 1: enough people that are immune to a virus. Uh. And
Speaker 1: it can be like you said, through vaccination or through
Speaker 1: having lived through the disease and then having antibodies, then
Speaker 1: the population is protected from that disease even if they
Speaker 1: are an immune. That's that's the idea that so many
Speaker 1: a certain threshold of people are immune that even people
Speaker 1: that choose not to vaccinate can hop on that wagon, right. Um.
Speaker 1: And it's not even like you hop on the wagon,
Speaker 1: like you are on the wagon just by vulture being
Speaker 1: alive in the society or culture. Right. So that's a
Speaker 1: good point. Um. There's a really easy way of understanding
Speaker 1: it that Molly Edmonds used in Um the House Stuff
Speaker 1: Works episode Unheard Immunity that if you pretend you're at
Speaker 1: a bowling alley and each person has their own lane,
Speaker 1: and this is basically that bowling alley lane is like
Speaker 1: there their bubble that they live in, their work their
Speaker 1: home and everything, and they don't encounter anybody else. That's
Speaker 1: kind of like Wally, But with bowling. If the first
Speaker 1: person on lane one comes down with say the flu um,
Speaker 1: he can very easily pass it on to the woman
Speaker 1: in lane two. If she's not immune to the flu,
Speaker 1: she will contract it and pass it on to the
Speaker 1: person in lane three, and so on and so forth,
Speaker 1: and it'll just keep going and eventually people will develop anybodies.
Speaker 1: Some of those people will die, most will survive, uh,
Speaker 1: and the flu will have a hard time getting through
Speaker 1: that population a second time around. But if the woman
Speaker 1: in lane two is already immunized to that flu strain,
Speaker 1: say through like a vaccine or something, then it's not
Speaker 1: going to transmit from the first guy in lane one
Speaker 1: to her, or it's certainly not going to transmit beyond her.
Speaker 1: So she's protected everybody in lanes three through ten just
Speaker 1: by virtue of having been immune to that flu virus.
Speaker 1: It's stopped with her, and that's the point of her immunity.
Speaker 1: That's the whole that's the basis of the whole thing. Yeah,
Speaker 1: And if we want to stick with bowling parlance, then
Speaker 1: that means that that lady is bowling strikes. She's throwing
Speaker 1: strikes strikes, not even seven ten splits, which she could
Speaker 1: if she wanted to. That's how she is. Yeah, the
Speaker 1: perfect game, right. I remember that dumb joke when I
Speaker 1: was a little about You know, you learn the stupidest
Speaker 1: jokes when you're a kid because they have to be
Speaker 1: so dumb. A kid can understand him, I think, I
Speaker 1: think so. But about the the guy who bowled a
Speaker 1: three hundred and one and you're like, you can't bowl
Speaker 1: a three d and one, Well, you can't bowl a
Speaker 1: three hundred and lose, man. I know. That's how bad
Speaker 1: it was, and that's how much it stuck with me.
Speaker 1: Did you get that from highlights? I don't know where
Speaker 1: I got that. It's pretty bad. It sounds like a
Speaker 1: playground joke. I think so. But I think you beat
Speaker 1: up in the playground even with that one. Yeah. So
Speaker 1: let's talk about her community some more. We talked about
Speaker 1: the two ways natural exposure and vaccinations, and if we're
Speaker 1: going back pre vaccination and talking about human history. Um,
Speaker 1: the hurt there was hert immunity, and it was I
Speaker 1: guess the way to describe it as herd immunity. The
Speaker 1: hard way. Um, people being exposed to the virus or
Speaker 1: the bacteria developing that immune response and enough, you know,
Speaker 1: they reached that tipping point where enough people have it
Speaker 1: to where everyone's immune. But they lost a lot of
Speaker 1: people along the way. Yeah, that's part of the problem
Speaker 1: is is if you look at it on an individual level,
Speaker 1: if you are exposed to a virus or a bacterium
Speaker 1: and it runs rampant and infects you when you come
Speaker 1: down with an illness from it, you there's basically two outcomes.
Speaker 1: You can put it up, put up an immune response
Speaker 1: and win, or you can lose and die. But if
Speaker 1: you survive and win, you've become immunized. And that's just
Speaker 1: the natural course of viruses or bacteria when they encounter humans.
Speaker 1: It's at least contagious ones infectious ones, right, um. And
Speaker 1: and we didn't have any recourse other than that. So
Speaker 1: it's actually kind of good that we do have this
Speaker 1: natural immune response to I mean, we just wouldn't be
Speaker 1: around anymore if we didn't have. Its. Part and parcel
Speaker 1: with human survival or any biological survival is to be
Speaker 1: able to mount in immune response, build antibodies so that
Speaker 1: if you do encounter this thing again. You don't have
Speaker 1: to go through the illness all over again for the
Speaker 1: most part. But like, we didn't have any other tools
Speaker 1: besides that until the nineteen forties when we were able
Speaker 1: to mass manufacture vaccines, and now all of a sudden,
Speaker 1: we could say, create herd immunity without anybody ever having
Speaker 1: to get sick or almost anybody, um, just through vaccination
Speaker 1: vaccination programs. Yeah, and here's the deal to uh. In
Speaker 1: you know, pre vaccination, they could build up an immunity,
Speaker 1: lose a lot of people on the way, and it
Speaker 1: wasn't like, all right, now we're fully set forever. Uh.
Speaker 1: Sometimes there would be like another swell of exposure, whether
Speaker 1: or not it's like a bunch of people moving into
Speaker 1: the country or a bunch of people being born, but
Speaker 1: basically non immune people kind of flooding the system. And
Speaker 1: then that percentage point that we're going to talk about
Speaker 1: dips below that number, and then you kind of you
Speaker 1: don't have to restart the whole process, but it kind
Speaker 1: of that hamster wheel gets going again until that herd
Speaker 1: immunity is then reached again. Yeah. That's I think that's
Speaker 1: um what's called an endemic disease where it's still they're
Speaker 1: just hanging in the background. But for the most part,
Speaker 1: people are immune to it. And then when you have
Speaker 1: like an influx of births or an influx of immigrants,
Speaker 1: that can flare up again. But then those people get
Speaker 1: um kind of taken into the immunized herd, become part
Speaker 1: of the immunized herd as well. And and the deal
Speaker 1: is is that natural herd immunity is all we had
Speaker 1: until we developed kind of the ability to make massive
Speaker 1: quantities of vaccines, right I think of the starting in
Speaker 1: the nineteen forties. Yeah, I mean there were a few
Speaker 1: researchers along the way who really brought this along. There
Speaker 1: was a couple of people, name a couple of dudes
Speaker 1: named W. W. C. Topley and G. S. Wilson who
Speaker 1: actually coined the term um herd immunity. But in ninety three.
Speaker 1: That was an UH epidemiologist named A. W. Hydrick who
Speaker 1: studied measles between ninety one and he's the one that
Speaker 1: actually kind of quantified this and said, I've done the math.
Speaker 1: If sixty percent of kids fifteen or younger were immune
Speaker 1: to measles, then we're not going to have a big outbreak,
Speaker 1: and he wrote a very famous paper about it, and
Speaker 1: that's where the term really took off. Yeah, and so, um,
Speaker 1: herd immunity is basically an epidemiological concept. It gets um sometimes,
Speaker 1: I think in the in the popular press especially, it
Speaker 1: gets kind of leaned on as if it's like a
Speaker 1: natural universal law or something like that. It's basically an observation,
Speaker 1: but one that has seems to be consistently held up
Speaker 1: by the success of vaccination programs that we've cre aided
Speaker 1: to generate artificial herd immunity. And that's the point. That's
Speaker 1: the point of vaccine programs is to say, okay, for
Speaker 1: for basically all of human history, all we had was
Speaker 1: that natural herd immunity, whether we liked it or not.
Speaker 1: But now that we have vaccines, we can create vaccine
Speaker 1: programs where if we vaccinate enough people, we can force
Speaker 1: this herd immunity without almost anybody getting sick. Like you
Speaker 1: might have a slight reaction to the vaccine for a
Speaker 1: small number of people, usually somewhere around like say three
Speaker 1: to ten percent, the vaccine is not going to protect you.
Speaker 1: But if enough people out there get this vaccine, they're
Speaker 1: going to be vaccinated. Immunized against the disease without ever
Speaker 1: having gotten it. And if enough people are vaccinated, we
Speaker 1: will have this herd immunity without having to undergo some
Speaker 1: disastrous epidemic that kills off some ungodly number of people
Speaker 1: and makes an even larger number of people sick. That's
Speaker 1: the basis of vaccines in the vaccination program. And I
Speaker 1: mean countless tens of millions of lives have been saved
Speaker 1: just from the fact that they have existed since the
Speaker 1: nineteen forties. Yeah, I mean that's when they came into
Speaker 1: mass production in se is, when we first started as humans.
Speaker 1: To kind of understand this concept, there was a man
Speaker 1: named Edward Jenner who inoculated a little kid, a little boy,
Speaker 1: against smallpox. And this is kind of gross sounding, but
Speaker 1: he infected him with the plus from a blister of
Speaker 1: cow cow pox, which is less deadly, and he was like, Hey,
Speaker 1: I think I'm onto something here, and in uh, two
Speaker 1: hundred and or I guess a hundred and forty something years,
Speaker 1: we're really going to be on the ball with this stuff, right.
Speaker 1: And there were others like vaccines along the way, but um,
Speaker 1: and I think they were all just kind of small batch.
Speaker 1: You know, like artisan vaccines that were created, um, but
Speaker 1: the uh, the it was like the forties where this
Speaker 1: on this mass industrial scale that that they were produced.
Speaker 1: And only under those circumstances can you actually get to
Speaker 1: herd immunity for like a large population like a state
Speaker 1: or a nation or a world. Basically, Yeah, and you know,
Speaker 1: I think we've said this will kind of keep beating
Speaker 1: this drum and repeating this, but the whole concept is
Speaker 1: to protect people who haven't even been vaccinated. Just sometimes
Speaker 1: you're too young to get vaccinated, Sometimes you have a
Speaker 1: condition as a child where you literally can't be vaccinated,
Speaker 1: or maybe you're elderly and you had been vaccinated. But
Speaker 1: you know, they always talk about, especially with COVID nineteen
Speaker 1: and and the flu, the elderly population is at risk
Speaker 1: because they're way more likely to develop complications like uh,
Speaker 1: pneumonia as a big one for what's going around now,
Speaker 1: but as far as even something like chicken pox, encephalitis
Speaker 1: or hepatitis. And we don't really know the deal with
Speaker 1: children and adults their immune system and exactly how they
Speaker 1: work and what the differences are, but it looks like
Speaker 1: kids are either more robust and against something like chicken pox,
Speaker 1: like when you have it as a kid is usually
Speaker 1: not such a big deal. When you have it as
Speaker 1: an adult, it is a big deal because it may
Speaker 1: be your adult system just going into overdrive saying you
Speaker 1: should have had this when you were six, Right, what
Speaker 1: is wrong with you? Didn't you have any friends? Did
Speaker 1: you have chicken pox? Probably didn't you? I did? I
Speaker 1: did here. Yeah, my sister always had. She had a
Speaker 1: pox scar like on her temple that I always admired,
Speaker 1: so I made sure to like pick one on my temple.
Speaker 1: I don't think Emily got it for some reason. I'm
Speaker 1: that is in my brain. Oh my is she? Does
Speaker 1: she have the vaccine against it? I think so? Okay,
Speaker 1: because since the mid nineties they came out with a
Speaker 1: vaccine against ari selah, which is the virus that causes
Speaker 1: chicken pox, And now it's like you don't have to
Speaker 1: get it as a kid any anymore. I'm pretty sure
Speaker 1: somebody I know didn't get it and did get the vaccine,
Speaker 1: and I'm pretty sure it's right, so pretty well so
Speaker 1: um so with chicken pox, that's a good example of
Speaker 1: how like you know, if you haven't when you're a kid,
Speaker 1: it's I mean, it's still life threatening. You can get
Speaker 1: all those same things like encephalitis or pneumonia, but you're
Speaker 1: just way likelier to get it as an adult. Same
Speaker 1: thing with the flu, Like the flu can be very
Speaker 1: deadly depending on how old you are. UM, I think
Speaker 1: something like it says ninety percent of flu related deaths
Speaker 1: and fifty to seventy percent of hospitalizations for the flu
Speaker 1: are for people over age sixty five. I mean, so
Speaker 1: for the same exact strain of a bug that, like
Speaker 1: you know, has a kid at home watching prices right
Speaker 1: for one day, maybe two, UM, it lands an older
Speaker 1: person over age sixty five in the hospital on the
Speaker 1: brink of death. You know, it's just different. And so
Speaker 1: because that there is that difference, it makes sense to
Speaker 1: immunize the young, inoculate the young, to protect the elderly.
Speaker 1: And let's not forget, even if you couldn't care less
Speaker 1: about the elderly, you hate the elderly because some old
Speaker 1: man yelled at you once when you threw a football
Speaker 1: in his yard, and you've hated all old people ever since.
Speaker 1: Then do you hate babies because there are there are
Speaker 1: babies who are too young to be inoculated? And then
Speaker 1: there's also those people, like you said, who don't have
Speaker 1: um healthy enough immune systems to get a vaccine, and
Speaker 1: so they rely on the everybody else the herd to
Speaker 1: be vaccinated to provide this immunity for them. So there
Speaker 1: are really good reasons to be vaccinated in addition to
Speaker 1: you yourself being immunized against these things. Yeah, and you know,
Speaker 1: these things work better in a homogeneous population. And every
Speaker 1: time I see that word, I want to say homogeneous
Speaker 1: for some reason, that's the British way of saying. Do
Speaker 1: they say that way? They probably do, probably just to
Speaker 1: be contrarian or contrary Indian. Uh, they work better and
Speaker 1: homogeneous populations, which there are not a lot of those
Speaker 1: uh still these days, um, thanks to you know, people
Speaker 1: integrating with one another. So when they do these calculations
Speaker 1: that we're about to talk about, they take all of
Speaker 1: that into account, races, ethnicities, mixed races, stuff like that.
Speaker 1: And so you know, we've been talking about the modeling
Speaker 1: and the math involved. It can get complicated, but it's
Speaker 1: really kind of simple that it's base form, don't you think, yes,
Speaker 1: especially if you're a mathematical genius in a statistical whiz,
Speaker 1: which I am not okay, But in the broad strokes, yeah,
Speaker 1: you you can make a pretty good case that it's
Speaker 1: understandable for sure that it's it's all based on the
Speaker 1: reproduction number in relation to the size of the population. Basically, yeah,
Speaker 1: and that reproduction number they in the in the biz,
Speaker 1: it's pronounced are not. It's are with a. I guess
Speaker 1: that's a zero. Huh, yeah, I'd to say our zero
Speaker 1: any day. Are not though, for an infection, is a
Speaker 1: number of people expected to contract that illness after coming
Speaker 1: into contact with an infected person under the right conditions
Speaker 1: that they can contract it. So a less confusing way
Speaker 1: of saying that is the are not number is the
Speaker 1: expected number of people that a contagious person is going
Speaker 1: to infect. Right, So if you understand this about a disease,
Speaker 1: if you know um, for example, with the MOMPS that's
Speaker 1: extremely contagious, which means that it has a high are
Speaker 1: not because the average person walking around infected with the
Speaker 1: MOMPS and contagious with the MOMPS is going to get
Speaker 1: something between ten and twelve other people infected with the
Speaker 1: MOMPS and then they themselves will be contagious. So that
Speaker 1: means that the MOMPS has a relatively high are not
Speaker 1: or reproduction number. So if you understand that about the moms,
Speaker 1: you can calculate how many people in a population have
Speaker 1: to be immunized against the momps to to prevent it
Speaker 1: from transmitting within that population. And, like we said, there's
Speaker 1: a lot more math to it than that, but ultimately,
Speaker 1: for the months in today's modern heterogeneous populations, is that
Speaker 1: the right way of saying. I don't know. Nobody says heterogeneous,
Speaker 1: do they. That sounds way too close to erotic. It
Speaker 1: sounds like something I would say, so um uh, in
Speaker 1: today's modern society, We'll just put it like that, you
Speaker 1: need to have about of any given population immunized against
Speaker 1: momps to reach what's called the herd immunity threshold. That
Speaker 1: herd immunity threshold is basically what I just said. It's
Speaker 1: the percentage of the population that has to be immunized
Speaker 1: for her immunity to kick in to cover everybody else. Yeah,
Speaker 1: and I know that everyone's going, what about COVID, What
Speaker 1: about COVID? What about COVID? Oh? Do you want to
Speaker 1: not even say yet? You want to wait? Okay, I
Speaker 1: mean that's fine, that's fine. We'll how about this let's
Speaker 1: take a break. Oh my god, this is just and
Speaker 1: then right after the break, we'll we'll dive into this
Speaker 1: stuff later, but right after the break, we'll give you
Speaker 1: sort of what they're thinking as of today when we
Speaker 1: record right after this shosh and shock. All right, So
Speaker 1: that was an unfair cliffhanger, uh, And keep in mind,
Speaker 1: like we kind of learned and we knew this was
Speaker 1: going to happen with our COVID nineteen podcast, it was
Speaker 1: out of date like days later, and this will be
Speaker 1: out of date because there's just so much we don't
Speaker 1: know yet and we're learning so much every day and
Speaker 1: every week. But I've seen the range from six is
Speaker 1: what they think the immunity threshold needs to be for
Speaker 1: UH to have a pretty successful herd immunity, Right, that's
Speaker 1: the current thinking that I saw as well, that they
Speaker 1: think the reproduction number is somewhere between two and three.
Speaker 1: I think that's a two point eight is like the
Speaker 1: most widely touted for COVID nineteen, thankfully. I mean, can
Speaker 1: you imagine if it was like a month's level, right, Yeah, No,
Speaker 1: that's especially with the fact that there's such a thing
Speaker 1: as asymptomatic carriers who can walk around in fating people.
Speaker 1: If that was that much more contagious, it would be, Yeah,
Speaker 1: it would be pretty rotten. Like it as bad as
Speaker 1: it is, it could conceivably be worse epidemiologically speaking. Yeah,
Speaker 1: And here's where we should also point out that, just
Speaker 1: like we're talking about her immunity, but if we reach
Speaker 1: her immunity, that doesn't mean like everything is solved. Um,
Speaker 1: if we come up with a vaccine, which we will,
Speaker 1: vaccines aren't effective against every single human, so things can
Speaker 1: still happen. Um, And then sometimes you get an immunization
Speaker 1: that's effective for a short time, for a few years. Maybe. Yeah,
Speaker 1: there's an outbreak of diphtheria in Russia. I mean, like
Speaker 1: tens of thousands of people fell ill with diphtheria, and
Speaker 1: they were almost all adults. And they went back and
Speaker 1: figured out the reason why this happened was because, um,
Speaker 1: those adults hadn't been given a booster shot for their
Speaker 1: diphtheria um inoculation and so so they're they're immune response.
Speaker 1: They're antibodies that they built up when they were children
Speaker 1: having been given this diphtheria vaccine had waned, and they
Speaker 1: it waned enough that diphtheria was able to kind of
Speaker 1: take over and and cause this outbreak. And so when
Speaker 1: you look at it like that, that's almost a really
Speaker 1: good analogy to herd immunity. It's like over time, the
Speaker 1: the the that threshold can be can be can decline
Speaker 1: so that the virus or the bacteria can get in
Speaker 1: the same thing. The individual level, if you don't get
Speaker 1: a booster shot if you need it. For some vaccines,
Speaker 1: you don't need it. I think measles, moms, and rubella
Speaker 1: are all considered UM to confer lifetime immunity if it
Speaker 1: does work on you, and I think those are nine
Speaker 1: seven percent effective. So for nine seven out of a
Speaker 1: hundred people, when you get an mm ARE vaccine as
Speaker 1: a kid, you don't need any kind of booster and
Speaker 1: you're gonna be immune to it for life, right, which
Speaker 1: is great. It is UM. That's the point of accedence. Yeah,
Speaker 1: and this is where we need to dip our toe
Speaker 1: into something UM. That's called vaccine hesitancy. That's that's what
Speaker 1: the official name for it is UH. And this is
Speaker 1: a situation we have UM. I'm not sure about other
Speaker 1: countries because I didn't do a lot of research into that.
Speaker 1: But here in the United States, especially certain parts of
Speaker 1: the United States, there are vaccinine vaccine exemptions in place,
Speaker 1: granted for philosophical purposes, religious purposes, personal reasons. UM. It
Speaker 1: is important to point out here that personal reasons get
Speaker 1: all the press. UM, like when you see articles about
Speaker 1: anti vaxxer's as people that choose not to get their
Speaker 1: child vaccinated for certain reasons. But the the largest percentage
Speaker 1: of people who don't get vaccinated very sadly. UM. It
Speaker 1: has to do with UH finances and poverty, right. I mean,
Speaker 1: like it's it's if you want to vaccinate your kid,
Speaker 1: but you can't because you don't have the money or
Speaker 1: they're not available to you. I think kids in rural
Speaker 1: areas have much lower vaccine rates than kids in urban areas. UM.
Speaker 1: That is really sad, and I think that's something that
Speaker 1: because it's such a public health success, UM, it should
Speaker 1: be something that's much more widely available than anybody who
Speaker 1: wants it. Yeah, here's some numbers on that. There was
Speaker 1: a study by the CDC in that noted the percentage
Speaker 1: of children without any vaccines had risen to about one
Speaker 1: point three percent. And these are kids that were born
Speaker 1: in the year two thousand fifteen, and then they compared
Speaker 1: that with the two thousand one survey. They found it
Speaker 1: was just point three percent of children between the ages
Speaker 1: of nineteen to thirty five months. So basically they looked
Speaker 1: at the numbers and they found that the children who
Speaker 1: are uninsured or who live in rural areas like you said,
Speaker 1: or maybe had Medicaid insurance. Seventeen point two percent of
Speaker 1: the unvaccinated kids were uninsured compared to two point eight
Speaker 1: percent of overall kids. There's a big deaf It is
Speaker 1: a huge diff for sure, UM. And then there are,
Speaker 1: like you said, there's parents who forego vaccinations, uh, for
Speaker 1: personal reasons or religious reasons, UM, or philosophical reasons, although
Speaker 1: I don't understand what the differences between philosophical and personal. Yeah,
Speaker 1: I agree, UM, and I'd be interested to find that out.
Speaker 1: But the people who don't vaccinate their kids for whatever reason,
Speaker 1: who make a conscious decision not to are UM tend
Speaker 1: to be viewed as freeloaders. And that's not just us
Speaker 1: like throw in shade, that's like the term that that
Speaker 1: is used as freeloaders. They're freeloading on the larger herd.
Speaker 1: To UM, prevent from being exposed to this disease or
Speaker 1: these diseases or viruses or bacteria, UM, because they're depending
Speaker 1: on other people to immunize their kids through vaccinations instead.
Speaker 1: That's right. Uh. And there's another weird phenomenon that's happened
Speaker 1: here in the US that where a vaccine program is
Speaker 1: so successful that generations will go by without any of
Speaker 1: this disease. So you're not even familiar with it. So
Speaker 1: it's sort of absurd in this way that it's been flipped.
Speaker 1: But one of the reasons sometimes you will hear uh
Speaker 1: to to not vaccinate. It's like, well, that old disease
Speaker 1: that haven't you know that, we haven't seen that in
Speaker 1: two hundred years, And I'm gonna put that vaccine in
Speaker 1: Mike Kid and a cycle. Yeah, because the vaccine worked, right,
Speaker 1: It's a victim of its own success. The vast vaccination
Speaker 1: program is. And I think from what I can tell,
Speaker 1: that's how UM public health officials typically explain uh anti
Speaker 1: vaccine or declines in vaccine rates among people who consciously
Speaker 1: choose not to that basically, they just haven't seen how
Speaker 1: bad a disease is, Like you haven't seen what polio
Speaker 1: can do. To somebody because you were born into a
Speaker 1: world war. For all intents and purposes, polio just didn't exist, right,
Speaker 1: And so you lose that incentive that somebody who is
Speaker 1: aware of what polio can do, um the incentive that
Speaker 1: that person has to vaccinate their kid. And then when
Speaker 1: you couple that with um questions about a vaccine or
Speaker 1: fears that there are some um negative side effects from
Speaker 1: a vaccine, that disincentive or that lack of incentive becomes
Speaker 1: a disincentive to get that. And so there's this ironic
Speaker 1: circle that develops where those vaccination rates go down, we
Speaker 1: dip below the herd immunity level, there's an outbreak of
Speaker 1: that disease, and then the very people who lead to
Speaker 1: that decline in vaccination levels point to that outbreak as
Speaker 1: evidence that vaccines don't work or herd immunity doesn't work,
Speaker 1: and it's it's um. It's hard to wrap your head around.
Speaker 1: It is very hard to wrap your head around, especially
Speaker 1: if you are fully on board the vaccine and UM
Speaker 1: herd immunity through vaccine trains. It can be fairly galling,
Speaker 1: I believe. Yeah. And there's a couple of things, A
Speaker 1: couple of big challenges to herd immunity and whether or
Speaker 1: not it can work today. And one of them is
Speaker 1: that we can get on an airplane with our family
Speaker 1: and we can fly great, great distances and get places
Speaker 1: really fast and then come home again really fast. And
Speaker 1: this happened in two thousand eight with the outbreak in
Speaker 1: San Diego. That was a family that went to Switzerland
Speaker 1: in um the this little boy picked up the virus
Speaker 1: of the measles while he was in Switzerland. Such a
Speaker 1: bad little boy he was. He was he he was unvaccinated,
Speaker 1: He got sick. When he got home, he infected eleven
Speaker 1: other people, including one who was an infant that was
Speaker 1: too young to be vaccinated. Just if you were like
Speaker 1: ambivalent about this through that that little detailing. Yeah, And
Speaker 1: at first they were like, what is going on here
Speaker 1: with this weird outbreak because we have a minimum threshold
Speaker 1: here in San Diego against the measles for her community,
Speaker 1: and in two thousand it was declared eliminated basically all
Speaker 1: over the country. And so they started to kind of
Speaker 1: poke around this case and they said, all right, San
Speaker 1: Diego is doing great, but this kid actually goes to
Speaker 1: a school and his localized social group is about seventeen
Speaker 1: of them uh at this school don't vaccinate. So while
Speaker 1: the city was doing fine, his little localized community had
Speaker 1: a pretty high percentage of unvaccinated kids, and so that
Speaker 1: allowed it to spread, right, It allowed it to spread.
Speaker 1: Those kids became immunized, they became ill, but then they
Speaker 1: became immunized to the measles naturally from being exposed to
Speaker 1: it and having fallen ill um. But the big problem is,
Speaker 1: in addition to the fact that it just kind of
Speaker 1: ravaged this hyperlocal social group, there are other pockets within
Speaker 1: the herd that probably bear a striking resemblance to that
Speaker 1: social group. And those social groups come in contact with
Speaker 1: the other social group that's been infected, you can have
Speaker 1: an epidemic within the larger immunized herd, which you don't want.
Speaker 1: You want those people to be protected. But the decline
Speaker 1: in vaccine rates and the fact that we can travel,
Speaker 1: like you were saying so easily, not only does it
Speaker 1: mean that like a virus or bacteria can travel just
Speaker 1: as fast on on board a human who's on a plane, um,
Speaker 1: it also means that there's constant fluctuations to the percentage
Speaker 1: that herd immunity threshold because of the influx and outflux
Speaker 1: of people who are vaccinated or not vaccinated. Right, And
Speaker 1: this is why those vaccination vaccination rates being high is
Speaker 1: really important, um, because it's it's protecting everybody. Yes, you
Speaker 1: want a large public buy in to the concept of vaccinations,
Speaker 1: and when there is not a large public buying, then
Speaker 1: your herd immunity is under threat and everybody who is
Speaker 1: bought in is is um at risk. Because again you
Speaker 1: might say, well, who cares if you if you've inoculated
Speaker 1: your kids, if they're immunized against measles, what do you
Speaker 1: care if somebody else's kid isn't because they have personal
Speaker 1: reasons against it. Um, your kids find they're inoculated, don't
Speaker 1: forget that. With the measles vaccine, I think it's like
Speaker 1: pcent effective and that that means that if there's a
Speaker 1: hundred hundred kids in a room and one of them
Speaker 1: has full on contagious measles, which again is very contagious
Speaker 1: like the mumps in its contagiousness, three of those kids
Speaker 1: who have been vaccinated are possibly going to get the
Speaker 1: measles from that kid even though they were vaccinated, because
Speaker 1: their body just didn't form the right immune response or
Speaker 1: enough of an immune response that they be protected if
Speaker 1: they were exposed to that kid. So it is a
Speaker 1: problem for even people who have been vaccinated against diseases
Speaker 1: to have a decline and herd immunity. And then also,
Speaker 1: don't forget the people who don't have uh an immune
Speaker 1: system that can allow for them to be inoculated or vaccinated,
Speaker 1: and the elderly who are just by virtue of being older,
Speaker 1: more susceptible to a really hard about with whatever disease
Speaker 1: it is they're being exposed to. Yeah, I've been running
Speaker 1: up against that, that frustrating sort of circular um non
Speaker 1: logic about COVID Night Team. I'm a member of a
Speaker 1: Facebook page of a an area and more rural Georgia.
Speaker 1: That's all I'll say. You could have just stopped at
Speaker 1: a Facebook page. And there's been a lot of that
Speaker 1: same sort of um circular logic of well, all these
Speaker 1: models are turning out to be wrong. They weigh overstated
Speaker 1: everything because look at the numbers falling. It's like that's
Speaker 1: because we social distance and because we did all this
Speaker 1: stuff and like it worked, that's how modeling works. Like
Speaker 1: the initial numbers were really high because that was just
Speaker 1: sort of the starting point, that was the input data
Speaker 1: was here we are at the beginning, and this can
Speaker 1: happen this way, and Americans got together by and large
Speaker 1: at first at least and did the right thing, and
Speaker 1: so those numbers went way down and it worked. And
Speaker 1: then they're using that as proof of like we'll see
Speaker 1: the modelings just off. They're just guessing. Yeah that a
Speaker 1: mile away of course. Just yeah, yeah, everything is political,
Speaker 1: huh yeah, And I'm just you know, I've tried to
Speaker 1: I've tried to avoid it, but I have also commented
Speaker 1: at times like modeling is not guessing. It is there.
Speaker 1: There's real research and math that goes into it, and
Speaker 1: and that math changes based on the input data. Like
Speaker 1: in a month, there will probably be different numbers. And
Speaker 1: it's not because they're just guessing and they're wrong, right right, Yeah,
Speaker 1: it's um it's that distrust and expertise that has really
Speaker 1: kind of wrecked things quite a bit. Yeah, all right,
Speaker 1: let's talk about what's going on right now and how
Speaker 1: this applies to our situation today with the novel coronavirus
Speaker 1: COVID nineteen call it whatever you want, Well, wait a minute,
Speaker 1: I think we should institute a tradition in this episode
Speaker 1: where every time we're about to talk about COVID, we
Speaker 1: make it a cliffhanger and take a break. Okay, all right,
Speaker 1: we'll take a break and we'll talk about all that
Speaker 1: right after this a shosh and shock. Alright, Chuck, thanks
Speaker 1: for playing along with me. We're gonna have like fifty
Speaker 1: ad breaks in here because we're gonna stop every time
Speaker 1: right before we talk about COVID. Yeah. So, what we're
Speaker 1: dealing with now in the most recent days, in a
Speaker 1: couple of weeks, is a new sort of divide has emerged. Um.
Speaker 1: Everyone got together at first, it seemed like and there
Speaker 1: was a lot of unity for five minutes, and then
Speaker 1: a dividing line has now formed. Um in the United
Speaker 1: States and kind of in the world, depending on what
Speaker 1: your view is on how to best handle this, and
Speaker 1: the two sort of route are and we'll talk about
Speaker 1: specific example examples of different countries and what they're doing.
Speaker 1: But there's elimination and then there's herd immunity and vaccinations
Speaker 1: and not by not pooping, you don't mean pooping. By elimination,
Speaker 1: I mean getting rid of it, of the of the virus.
Speaker 1: But not by pooping, no, not by pooping. But we're
Speaker 1: talking about a few countries in particular. Everyone's talking about
Speaker 1: Sweden right now because Sweden, compared to the rest of
Speaker 1: the Nordic countries, the rest of Europe and most of
Speaker 1: the rest of the world, was one country that was like,
Speaker 1: you know what we are gonna say, if you feel sick,
Speaker 1: stay at home. If you're at risk, maybe stay at home,
Speaker 1: try and uh keep a safe distance from people. But
Speaker 1: bars are open, restaurants are open. Um, no big concerts
Speaker 1: or anything like that, and let's try and get that
Speaker 1: herd immunity going instead of shutting everything down. Right. So
Speaker 1: they're they're pursuing mixture of like social distancing guidelines, but
Speaker 1: nothing that's being super enforced aside from you know, those gatherings,
Speaker 1: like you said. But ultimately they're pursuing basically a strategy
Speaker 1: of herd immunity while trying their best to keep the
Speaker 1: curve flattened, right, And I think we're pushing this one
Speaker 1: out sooner, So this will just be out like four
Speaker 1: or five days from now, and all these numbers are
Speaker 1: going to be changing. But the jury is kind of
Speaker 1: still out on whether or not that's working in Sweden. UM,
Speaker 1: as of a couple of days ago, they have a
Speaker 1: far higher infection rate than their Nordic neighbors. UM not,
Speaker 1: I mean it's a little lower than some other countries
Speaker 1: to the south. So we just don't really know yet
Speaker 1: because the jury is still out. We don't know what
Speaker 1: our our percentage needs to be right now. Like I said,
Speaker 1: it could be as high as eight percent, So we
Speaker 1: just don't know. As these numbers come in over the
Speaker 1: next month or two, it's gonna be really telling. UM.
Speaker 1: I think kind of either way you slice it, it's
Speaker 1: not right to say, all right, we'll look at Sweden
Speaker 1: and if if it works there, that means it's gonna
Speaker 1: work everywhere, because that's just not the case. No be
Speaker 1: in Sweden has like consistently beat this drum. They're like, look,
Speaker 1: we're not even sure this is gonna work for us,
Speaker 1: but we're willing to try it. But we're far likelier
Speaker 1: to be successful at something like this because our UM
Speaker 1: population maybe is a little more collectivists than some other populations.
Speaker 1: They're healthier, They are healthier, they have a big deal
Speaker 1: a much stronger um and more responsive health care system.
Speaker 1: They have a more homogeneous population don't forget, which may
Speaker 1: mean that they could reach HERD immunity more quickly than
Speaker 1: some other countries that have less homogeneous populations. Sweden is
Speaker 1: more homogeneous. They also get this. They also they don't
Speaker 1: have like huge mega grocery stores where there's a thousand
Speaker 1: or undred people milling around all at the same time.
Speaker 1: They have like smaller shops and markets serve like a
Speaker 1: particular like corner in the neighborhood, and they have them
Speaker 1: like every few corners, so there's not tons of people
Speaker 1: in the market at every given at any given moment.
Speaker 1: There's just a lot of differences between Swedish culture and
Speaker 1: say American culture. That's that is giving the Swedes the
Speaker 1: confidence to try this. But even still, there are people
Speaker 1: in Sweden that are like, this is indefensibly reckless. We
Speaker 1: can't do this, we can't try this is a stupid
Speaker 1: and like you said, there are some early signs that
Speaker 1: it is not going so well because compared to um Norway, Denmark,
Speaker 1: and Finland, their death rate adjusted for um UH population
Speaker 1: size is between three and six times the death rate
Speaker 1: of those nations, and those nations tried elimination. Yeah, and
Speaker 1: I saw that the UM. I don't. I don't think
Speaker 1: it was like the I think it might have been
Speaker 1: the head of whatever their CDC is said that they
Speaker 1: were surprised by the death toll. Yeah, yeah, and not
Speaker 1: in a way like they seem like really good people,
Speaker 1: so it's not like, oh, we never thought of this,
Speaker 1: but I think they were surprised. It is as high
Speaker 1: as it's been right UM. And so Sweden is not
Speaker 1: the only one trying this. India is trying it as well,
Speaker 1: and they're doing something very similar to Sweden. They have
Speaker 1: a lot of social distancing guidelines, but are also kind
Speaker 1: of hoping for natural herd immunity to kick in UM.
Speaker 1: And they don't have much of a choice there. They
Speaker 1: have like point five five hospital beds, so a little
Speaker 1: over half of a hospital bed per one thousand people
Speaker 1: in the country, and forty four thousand ventilators UM. But
Speaker 1: that both Sweden and India are taking a strategy of saying,
Speaker 1: if you're older, if you're elderly, if you are in
Speaker 1: this high risk group for suffering complications from COVID nineteen,
Speaker 1: you stay home too, and we'll let the younger population
Speaker 1: go out and get sick because they can handle it
Speaker 1: better and maybe less of a strain on the health
Speaker 1: care system. Um, and they'll be the immunized herd for
Speaker 1: the rest of the population. I don't know if those
Speaker 1: strategies are going to work or not, um, but that's
Speaker 1: kind of like the mentality behind them. Yeah. And there
Speaker 1: are other countries. I think in England they originally we're
Speaker 1: going to kind of follow that model, and then everyone
Speaker 1: said no way, bollocks to that, and so they have,
Speaker 1: um got some stricter measures going. Belarus is the one
Speaker 1: place that's really that. The president there, who's been in
Speaker 1: office i think since, has called the stricter responses around
Speaker 1: the world mass psychosis, and he's basically like, I mean
Speaker 1: they're having a full on military parade this weekend and saying,
Speaker 1: screw all this. Uh. And Belarus has one of Europe's
Speaker 1: highest per capita infection rates. Yeah, it's like, have any
Speaker 1: of you even seen there ownavirus and yourself I haven't. Yeah, jeez.
Speaker 1: There was a guy on one of this that same
Speaker 1: Facebook page that said I don't even know a single
Speaker 1: person who's had it l O L. And I was like, well,
Speaker 1: you're you're lucky, sir. You should be thankful for that,
Speaker 1: and he's like, hmm, it's not luck could be something
Speaker 1: else dot dot dot, and it's just like, I'm stepping
Speaker 1: out of this immediately. Man, I don't know if I
Speaker 1: I say hats off to you for being on that
Speaker 1: Facebook group or just deeply pity you for being on
Speaker 1: that Facebook group. Well I sort of have to be
Speaker 1: because I have to keep up with some things. Uh.
Speaker 1: This is a another part of Georgia where on a
Speaker 1: little little tract of land. Oh gotch, So you need
Speaker 1: to like nobody's squatting on it. Yeah, I'm the only squatter. So.
Speaker 1: Um So, this whole herd immunity thing, there's herd immunity
Speaker 1: itself has been controversial, uh since before the COVID nineteen pandemic. Right,
Speaker 1: those same but who questioned vaccines also questioned the concept
Speaker 1: of reaching herd immunity through vaccinations. There's like suspicion that, um,
Speaker 1: you're artificially suppressing the vaccine and you're actually weakening the
Speaker 1: immune system, and that it's going to set us up
Speaker 1: for this horrible problem down the road. None of that
Speaker 1: bears scrutiny under logic. Um, but today herd immunity has
Speaker 1: kind of reached this controversial inflection point for a totally
Speaker 1: different reason, and that the people who are saying, well,
Speaker 1: we're going to opt for to try for her immunity
Speaker 1: now rather than later so that we can get our
Speaker 1: economy going again, what they're talking about is her community
Speaker 1: without a vaccine. Big, big, big difference, huge difference, because
Speaker 1: what they're talking about is basically reverting back to the
Speaker 1: pre vaccine thing where it was just like, Okay, I
Speaker 1: hope we get to herd immunity sooner than later, and
Speaker 1: a lot of people are going to die along the way.
Speaker 1: And that's one of the big flaws of this argument
Speaker 1: of going for her immunity right now, which is there's
Speaker 1: going to be a lot of people who die as
Speaker 1: a result before we get to her immunity because we
Speaker 1: don't have a vaccine there. We're going to have to
Speaker 1: reach her community through just exposure to this virus, just
Speaker 1: like in the old timey days. Yeah, I was about
Speaker 1: to say, it's as if we were living in ancient
Speaker 1: times and just sort of crossing our fingers. So lots
Speaker 1: of death is a big flaw against it. Um If
Speaker 1: if the reproduction number for stars Cove two is three,
Speaker 1: that's confusing. But if it has, If if COVID nineteen
Speaker 1: has a reproduction number of three, let's say um, and
Speaker 1: that that means that the herd immunity threshold is about
Speaker 1: se That's about the high end that anybody's saying is
Speaker 1: seventy should stop the virus from spreading anymore. Right, So
Speaker 1: if that's the case, then that means seventy of a
Speaker 1: population would be sick. And I think a half to
Speaker 1: one percent of a fatality rate would mean that of
Speaker 1: the larger population, point three five to point seven percent
Speaker 1: of the population will die. So if you know that,
Speaker 1: and you can take just the populations of some of
Speaker 1: these countries that are trying this and say, well, before
Speaker 1: you reach her community, um Sweden, out of your population
Speaker 1: of ten point to five million people, about thirty six
Speaker 1: thousand to seventy two thousand are going to die along
Speaker 1: the way. Statistically speaking, that's the number that you can
Speaker 1: bet on, Yeah, between one point to five and about
Speaker 1: two and a half a million in the US. And
Speaker 1: if you're going to look at the world population, we're
Speaker 1: talking numbers higher than the Spanish flu twenty seven to
Speaker 1: about fifty four million people dead. And that's if you know,
Speaker 1: we're not saying like that's gonna happen. We're saying that's
Speaker 1: if the whole world took the approach of just all right,
Speaker 1: let's just see how we do, you know, right, And
Speaker 1: and I mean like this, that's we're a virgin population humanity,
Speaker 1: not just the US, not just Canada, not just the UK,
Speaker 1: not just Sweden. The world is a virgin population to
Speaker 1: this virus because it's a novel coronavirus. We've never no
Speaker 1: one on Earth has ever been exposed to this particular
Speaker 1: virus before, so there isn't any pre built in immunity
Speaker 1: like there would be if it makes another round a
Speaker 1: year from now, right, So it just burns. Viruses and
Speaker 1: bacteria burn their way through populations like that. So you
Speaker 1: can imagine it would spread, uh, pretty effectively. And if
Speaker 1: the fatality rate really is a half to one percent,
Speaker 1: those numbers could be pretty real depending on what what
Speaker 1: measures we take to mitigate those, Like you were saying,
Speaker 1: so death that's a big, big problem, um. And also
Speaker 1: along the way, we would be doing the opposite of
Speaker 1: flattening the curve by just letting people go out and
Speaker 1: getting sick to get things over with. Yeah. I mean,
Speaker 1: we we've worked so hard to flatten the curve and
Speaker 1: it worked in most of the most of the United States,
Speaker 1: except you know, these weird outbreaks in in smaller towns
Speaker 1: that didn't have enough beds and then laters and that's
Speaker 1: all been really really sad to see happen. But by
Speaker 1: and large, we did the right thing for a while
Speaker 1: and it flattened the curve pretty well. But this would
Speaker 1: fatten that curve right back up. Uh, and we'd be
Speaker 1: in that same like in a worse situation than we
Speaker 1: were going in, right. So, um, that's another big one.
Speaker 1: And then also took reinfection is another huge flaw in this.
Speaker 1: We don't know if stars cove two, which causes COVID nineteen, um,
Speaker 1: how fast it's mutating. If it's like other coronaviruses or
Speaker 1: other flu viruses, it probably has a lot of what's
Speaker 1: called antigenic drift, where it mutates really rapidly and creates
Speaker 1: new strains that the antibodies that have built up this
Speaker 1: immune defense against one variety are useless to fight this
Speaker 1: new variety. Right. Yeah, some diseases don't do that, like polio.
Speaker 1: The reason our polio vaccine has been so successful is
Speaker 1: because it doesn't mutate very much, it doesn't call it,
Speaker 1: it doesn't create new strains. With coronavirus is they tend
Speaker 1: to do that a lot, so there's a real chance
Speaker 1: for reinfection. So this herd immunity will just be like
Speaker 1: this ongoing thing until we can come up with the
Speaker 1: viable vaccine that can that can protect us from basically
Speaker 1: any mutated variety of this coronavirus. That's right, an antigenic drift.
Speaker 1: Do I need to say it? No? You don't, great? Great?
Speaker 1: Oh yeah, Chuck, I think he's for sure that that
Speaker 1: muted trumpet thing that they got going on. What's that
Speaker 1: thing called on the trumpet that they make that sound with.
Speaker 1: Oh yeah, the plunger plunger head muffler, the thing. I
Speaker 1: don't know. Yeah, you're on the trolley. So. Uh. The
Speaker 1: other thing that we need to consider, and that is
Speaker 1: the other sort of way that you can go about
Speaker 1: this is elimination. Elimination that we were talking about, and
Speaker 1: not pooping, and that is the opposite tactic, and that's
Speaker 1: what most of the world has done, including the u S,
Speaker 1: which is self quarantining, isolating, trying to contain the virus,
Speaker 1: closing borders, mass gloves, all that stuff. Um, we have
Speaker 1: flattened the curve for the most part. Other countries have
Speaker 1: come close to elimination. New Zealand is getting a lot
Speaker 1: of press because they and you know, they got a
Speaker 1: lot of Again, you can't say, like, well, the same
Speaker 1: thing could happen here in the US because New Zealand
Speaker 1: is a very isolated place and it's a smaller population
Speaker 1: and they have super smart elected officials and smart people
Speaker 1: who listen to those elected officials. Good to get no, man,
Speaker 1: someone come at me news. England's Prime minister is amazing.
Speaker 1: She's she's like one of the best. Yeah. I remember
Speaker 1: when we were there. Um, we got a cabra, do
Speaker 1: you me? And I did to the airport and this
Speaker 1: this guy, I think it was an immigrant from Sri
Speaker 1: Lanka and he just could not stop boasting about how
Speaker 1: great the New Zealand government was, about how taking care
Speaker 1: of their population was, how like how much of a
Speaker 1: sense of community the whole country had, and it was
Speaker 1: just really refreshing to experience. Yeah it is, Uh, maybe
Speaker 1: we should move there anyway. So the thing about New Zealand, Yeah,
Speaker 1: I'm sure there's some people listening like yeah, why don't
Speaker 1: you move there if you love it so much? And
Speaker 1: there's there's also Kiwis that are going come on over,
Speaker 1: We'd love to have you. And then there's also probably
Speaker 1: some there like please don't. We've had enough of you too.
Speaker 1: So why it worked there though, was because, like I said,
Speaker 1: they have you have to have everyone on board, and
Speaker 1: it seemed like most everyone on board or got on
Speaker 1: board in New Zealand, and that's just not happened here.
Speaker 1: So yeah, and I mean, it really has worked for
Speaker 1: New Zealand, but they've taken serious restrictions, like you you
Speaker 1: can't fly if you want to domestically, they shut down
Speaker 1: their reports. If you want to fly to New Zealand,
Speaker 1: t s for you, you're not gonna get anywhere near
Speaker 1: the country. But in addition that, if you're a New
Speaker 1: Zealand citizen, you can't fly from one place to another
Speaker 1: if you want to just for the heck of it. Right,
Speaker 1: There's so they've really insted instituted some draconian measures, but
Speaker 1: it seems to have worked. Like there was a report
Speaker 1: that came out two days ago on May fourth, that
Speaker 1: says that the models originally used to project how many cases.
Speaker 1: New Zealand was going to have said that they were
Speaker 1: going to get something like a thousand cases a day
Speaker 1: if they did nothing like no lockdown measures. All they've
Speaker 1: had since March is fourteen hundred and eighty seven cases,
Speaker 1: not a thousand a day, seven cases total, and they've
Speaker 1: only had twenty deaths. So it seems like elimination can work.
Speaker 1: And for that reason, and a lot of people are
Speaker 1: a lot of countries have said this is what we're
Speaker 1: gonna try, and elimination just amounts to hiding out from
Speaker 1: the virus until a vaccine can be developed. The problem
Speaker 1: is there are serious flaws to that too, depending on
Speaker 1: what kind of what kind of government and culture that
Speaker 1: you have. But even without that, depending on that, it
Speaker 1: requires that everybody act basically perfectly and avoid everybody else
Speaker 1: and give up your job, give up your economy and
Speaker 1: wait until somebody comes up with a vaccine. And that
Speaker 1: can be a really pricey, costly measure. Yeah, which is
Speaker 1: why a lot of people are like this, this we
Speaker 1: got to find some other way, Yeah, And they've looked
Speaker 1: at um there are like ways you can look at
Speaker 1: the countries and decide whether or not people are going
Speaker 1: to comply or not. Um, there was uh some cultural data.
Speaker 1: There was a company called half Steata Insights, and they
Speaker 1: look it things like individualism of a population, basically like
Speaker 1: whether or not people are gonna all go along or
Speaker 1: if people are like heck no, man, I want my freedoms.
Speaker 1: I'm an individual, I'm an American and you can't tell
Speaker 1: me what to do, right. And you might not be
Speaker 1: surprised to learn that in Sweden, Uh they have a
Speaker 1: rank of seventy one out of one hundred as on individualism.
Speaker 1: Uh the U scores ninety one out of a hundred,
Speaker 1: so basically out of a hundred would be uh difficult
Speaker 1: to maintain. You know, these kind of restrictions for too long.
Speaker 1: I mean, if you look at it like that, it's remarkable,
Speaker 1: how it's remarkable, in heartening, how much people have given
Speaker 1: up individual liberties for the greater good in this pandemic
Speaker 1: in the United States. Then, like I hadn't looked at
Speaker 1: it that way. I just kind of saw like one
Speaker 1: and thought, okay, you know that's that's that's a that's
Speaker 1: a high score. There's a lot of individualism in the
Speaker 1: United States. We gotta into visual streak like nobody's business, right,
Speaker 1: But if you look at it almost like it's a
Speaker 1: it's a percentage of the population that will listen in
Speaker 1: situations like this, then it really does kind of go
Speaker 1: to show you how how much of a sacrifice people
Speaker 1: have made, not just Americans. I don't want to just
Speaker 1: say it like that, Like if you're in a collective
Speaker 1: of society, you're still sacrificing for the greater good. It's
Speaker 1: just possibly a little more culturally ingrained in you that
Speaker 1: this is the thing to do. But either way, the
Speaker 1: idea of people people sacrificing for others is is it's heartening.
Speaker 1: The problem is is people can only sacrifice for so
Speaker 1: long until you have just massive economic drawbacks. And and
Speaker 1: that's the thing. So if you follow the forced herd
Speaker 1: immunity natural herd immunity strategy towards COVID nineteen, you will
Speaker 1: it will result in a lot of deaths. If you
Speaker 1: follow the elimination strategy, it results in a trem in
Speaker 1: this amount of economic hardship. And it's easy to say,
Speaker 1: chuck like, well, lives lost tops economic hardship any day
Speaker 1: of the week, And ultimately, yes it does. But it's
Speaker 1: you really should not um understate the toll in human
Speaker 1: misery of economic hardships and how bad this has gotten
Speaker 1: for some people and how quickly. Yeah, And the other
Speaker 1: thing I'll say too, is one of the arguments I've
Speaker 1: heard is that, you know, there are going to be
Speaker 1: so many deaths from people who are who are depressed
Speaker 1: because they can't go out, and people dying by suicide
Speaker 1: and stuff like that, which you know, I don't want
Speaker 1: to minimize that because that that for sure has an
Speaker 1: impact on people. But I saw a tweet from a
Speaker 1: guy that was talking about can we just stop pretending
Speaker 1: that our former world of like working fifty hours a
Speaker 1: week and commuting in a stressful environment and hectic crowds
Speaker 1: and mask consu umerism and pollution and everything else was
Speaker 1: like a mental health utopia. So it's you know, you've
Speaker 1: got to kind of look at the big picture and
Speaker 1: not just pick and choose what you're going to highlight
Speaker 1: because it fits your narrative. You know. Yeah, I think
Speaker 1: one of the like the few good outcomes so far
Speaker 1: of this has been like a huge down shift in
Speaker 1: that um manic productivity that drives most Americans, you know. Yeah,
Speaker 1: And you know, here's The thing is, we don't know.
Speaker 1: Everything is so new. We're not gonna sit here and
Speaker 1: pretend like there is only one right way, like, we
Speaker 1: don't know. So there's so much that we don't know
Speaker 1: about this is we don't know the exact right path
Speaker 1: forward yet as a population, and the medical community doesn't
Speaker 1: know the exact right path forward. We're all trying to
Speaker 1: figure this out in real time and build the road
Speaker 1: as we're driving on it or whatever that expression is.
Speaker 1: And you know, I have my money on uh, staying
Speaker 1: at home, slowing this thing down and elimination. Other people
Speaker 1: might feel a different way, But it seems like that
Speaker 1: way is working better. Yeah it is. But again, if
Speaker 1: you it's still early and the data is still coming in.
Speaker 1: There was a report this week of a hundred New
Speaker 1: York hospitals. They found that six or six percent of
Speaker 1: new cases where among people who had stayed at home
Speaker 1: and mostly followed the elimination strategy. So this one guy,
Speaker 1: this doctor who wrote an article that I read, Dr
Speaker 1: Stephen Phillips. He said, look, man, like, in addition to
Speaker 1: all the stuff that we need to be doing to
Speaker 1: handle this pandemic, let's also create like a really robust
Speaker 1: data sharing um arrangement, so that we can look back
Speaker 1: a year or a few years from now and study
Speaker 1: this and say, oh, actually, these countries followed elimination mixed
Speaker 1: with the social distancing guidelines, or they followed herd uh
Speaker 1: immunity pursuit um and they actually came out on top.
Speaker 1: So that we will know the next time which one
Speaker 1: actually does work. Taking everything into account the cost in lives,
Speaker 1: the economic cost, the cost and personal liberty, and find
Speaker 1: the best way forward. And it probably won't be a
Speaker 1: panacea where everything works like one thing works for every country,
Speaker 1: but we'll have a pretty good model hopefully that can
Speaker 1: be adjusted to suit the individual country that's adopting it. Hopefully.
Speaker 1: That's if we can get past all of the arguing
Speaker 1: over whether this is even real or not. Yeah, and
Speaker 1: I know it's hard right now, but I think that
Speaker 1: the most dangerous thing right now is to have the
Speaker 1: mindset of, well, you know what, I'm pretty kg and
Speaker 1: the weather is nice, and I don't know anyone personally
Speaker 1: who's gotten it, so I'm just sort of going to
Speaker 1: ease back into normality here. I think that's that's when
Speaker 1: the second wave comes and things get worse and it's tough, uh,
Speaker 1: and everyone is anti and KG myself include did you
Speaker 1: know I find myself wanting to do things. Um, and
Speaker 1: it's tough on on kids especially, But I think it's
Speaker 1: more important now than ever to keep up what's what
Speaker 1: we're doing. Yeah, we haven't just magically wished the pandemic away.
Speaker 1: It didn't work. No, and lovely weather. Um, you know
Speaker 1: to take your walks, get outside, do it safely, but
Speaker 1: that it is not a reason to be like, well
Speaker 1: that's old news. Now we can just go back to normal,
Speaker 1: right right. I saw a post to button it up.
Speaker 1: I'm sorry we keep going back back and forth on this,
Speaker 1: but I saw a post that said, um, easing of
Speaker 1: lockdown doesn't mean that the pandemic has gone away. It
Speaker 1: means that they have a hospital bed for you now,
Speaker 1: right exactly? You got anything else? I got nothing else? Man?
Speaker 1: All right, Well that's it for her community. Hopefully you
Speaker 1: guys learned something I definitely did from researching all this,
Speaker 1: and we hope everyone out there is staying safe, insane
Speaker 1: and uh, hanging in there. That's right. Uh. Since I
Speaker 1: said hanging in there, it's time chuck for listener mail.
Speaker 1: I'm gonna call this thanks from England and a little
Speaker 1: shout out. Hey, guys, I wanted to say thank you,
Speaker 1: thank you for your ongoing efforts with Stuff you Should Know.
Speaker 1: It's been a welcome distraction at work. I, along with
Speaker 1: so many feel like we know you guys so well
Speaker 1: with Stuff you Should Know and Chuck's movie Crush and
Speaker 1: Josh's Into the World podcasts. I hope your families remain
Speaker 1: safe and from my son Dexter and I we wish
Speaker 1: you all the best for yourselves in the future of
Speaker 1: the podcast. Sorry to ramble on, which, by the way, Ben,
Speaker 1: that was not rambling on. That was concise and beautiful.
Speaker 1: But you're from England, so you're very kind. Uh. Sorry
Speaker 1: to ramble On, but I was wondering if you would
Speaker 1: be kind enough to shout out all the UK NHS
Speaker 1: staff that are helping us over here. I have friends
Speaker 1: and family that work for the NHS services and this
Speaker 1: is the only way I know how to say thank you,
Speaker 1: So for sure, Ben, thank you to not only them,
Speaker 1: but to medical providers all over the world who are
Speaker 1: working hard risking their own lives UM, often with UM
Speaker 1: equipment that's being reused when it shouldn't be and uh,
Speaker 1: I'm not going to wade into those waters. But you
Speaker 1: don't have all that you need to do your job
Speaker 1: right now and that's terrible and we should not be
Speaker 1: in this position. But we are so thank you. Uh.
Speaker 1: He also says ps Torquay. We heard from a bunch
Speaker 1: of people on this uh you mentioned the other week
Speaker 1: and I think that Agatha Christie segment we would pronounce
Speaker 1: it tour as in tour bus and key Torquay. It's
Speaker 1: always fun to hear how everyone pronounces these bloody silly
Speaker 1: towns over here. Kind regards. That is from Ben Cleaver
Speaker 1: and Harrowgates, England. Hirogaty Ben. That was such a good
Speaker 1: email that we are now friends. That's right, thank you
Speaker 1: for that. That was much needed man Um, thanks a
Speaker 1: lot for that, and we will very happily shout out
Speaker 1: the entire NHS, especially all of the people who are
Speaker 1: out there on the front lines working to save people's
Speaker 1: lives against COVID nineteen or anything that happens to it
Speaker 1: befallen them. That's right, Um, Thanks again, Ben, And if
Speaker 1: you want to be like Ben and get in touch
Speaker 1: with us, whether you want to tell us to stop
Speaker 1: being so political, or you want to tell us that
Speaker 1: you think we're great. It doesn't matter. We want to
Speaker 1: hear from you. Either way, You can email us by
Speaker 1: sending one to Stuff podcast at iHeart radio dot com.
Speaker 1: Stuff you Should Know is a production of iHeart Radio's
Speaker 1: How Stuff Works. For more podcasts for my heart Radio,
Speaker 1: visit the iHeart Radio app, Apple Podcasts, or wherever you
Speaker 1: listen to your favorite shows.