Speaker 1: Well, we have come in your city.
Speaker 2: I wanna pay.
Speaker 3: I get to saying you a consciences will be entire
Speaker 3: little tell and if you want a little banging again,
Speaker 3: I come along.
Speaker 4: I'll let you know.
Speaker 5: Where there's no season, you won't have to know. If
Speaker 5: there's no cease fire, you're not gonna have to know
Speaker 5: you you don't have to look at one big glow
Speaker 5: coming out of Iran.
Speaker 3: Ice to meet is a criminal operation. I've said all
Speaker 3: along we should abolish ice.
Speaker 1: Sure then brought you really a democracy until nineteen sixty three,
Speaker 1: nineteen six sciety right, you know, voting rights and civil rights.
Speaker 3: We weren't, we were apart.
Speaker 6: Time freedom is back in style. Welcome to the revolution. Yea,
Speaker 6: we have coming to your site.
Speaker 7: The way I.
Speaker 6: Gets and saying you.
Speaker 3: A conscious silt.
Speaker 6: Sean Hennity Show, more me, I'm the scenes, information on
Speaker 6: freaking news and more bold inspired solutions for America.
Speaker 1: Thanks Dot Cawn an hour two Sean Hannity Show told
Speaker 1: free this Monday. It's eight hundred and nine foot one Shawn.
Speaker 1: If you want to be a part of the program. Well,
Speaker 1: Donald Trump promised, made promise, kept and I'm not sure
Speaker 1: why our government doesn't trust us enough to think that
Speaker 1: we can handle the idea that God, the creator of
Speaker 1: heavens and earth and signs now, has shown us that
Speaker 1: we have universes within universes within universes well beyond human comprehension,
Speaker 1: you know, the idea that there could be life on
Speaker 1: other planets. Now, I don't see anything theologically, biblically contradicts
Speaker 1: the idea that God may be created intelligent life elsewhere.
Speaker 1: I had, for example, Luigi Venda Telli on I mean,
Speaker 1: this guy's telling the story. It is unbelievable. His story,
Speaker 1: and he's been telling this story now forever, is that
Speaker 1: he worked with the government actually saying that we have
Speaker 1: one of these vehicles if you will tran you know,
Speaker 1: and it's like a flying sauce the way it's often
Speaker 1: been described and depicted in Hollywood films. As a matter
Speaker 1: of fact, I have a cut of my podcast with
Speaker 1: Luigi Venda Telly, and here's what he says.
Speaker 8: It wasn't moving in a linear fashion. It was one
Speaker 8: moment it's here, another moment it's here. It's like it's skipping.
Speaker 8: It's almost like skipping in and out of visual. It's
Speaker 8: coming towards you, but you're not seeing the whole line,
Speaker 8: you know what I mean, the whole trajectory. And he says,
Speaker 8: it was very close to them. It was very bright,
Speaker 8: and he said it was as clear as they It
Speaker 8: was a disc. It was lit, he says, a yellowish
Speaker 8: orange light. It was like the whole skin of the
Speaker 8: craft is lit. Was getting very bright. Bob said, that
Speaker 8: has to do with the propulsion system. It's the way
Speaker 8: that the skin of the craft has an electrical field
Speaker 8: on it. And he says, and it just vanished, It
Speaker 8: just disappeared.
Speaker 1: Well, that's from Age of Disclosure. One of the stars
Speaker 1: of that show, and the guy that has all the
Speaker 1: knowledge is Lou Elizandov is with us.
Speaker 3: Lou, great to have your back, stir Sean.
Speaker 4: Thank you for having me. It's always an honor and privilege.
Speaker 3: Why don't you explain your background?
Speaker 1: And the fact that you really can't even tell us
Speaker 1: everything you know because you still have a top security
Speaker 1: clearance and considering you're not part of the government, makes
Speaker 1: me wonder why.
Speaker 4: Well, great, great question, Sean. I started off my career
Speaker 4: after college joined the army for a little bit, and
Speaker 4: then I became a career special agent in counterintelligence, and
Speaker 4: my focus primarily was counterinsurgency, counter terrorism, and encounter espionage.
Speaker 4: Now what does that mean, Well, it doesn't really mean
Speaker 4: a whole lot, other than my entire career in the
Speaker 4: US government was always very no nonsense. I always consider
Speaker 4: myself just a fact man kind of guy. In fact,
Speaker 4: when I was in college, I studied medicine, specifically microbiology
Speaker 4: and immunology. So I've always been a disciple of these
Speaker 4: scientific methods and principles. But in two thousand and nine,
Speaker 4: all that really changed for me, and it changed when
Speaker 4: I was brought into a program. I did not, by
Speaker 4: the way, for the record, I had no idea what
Speaker 4: it was at the time. But I was brought into
Speaker 4: a program asked to provide counterintelligence and security support for
Speaker 4: this effort, and like many steps, they don't tell you
Speaker 4: what it is until once you get in and you
Speaker 4: kind of sign it to sign paperwork. But I remember
Speaker 4: the conversation very specifically, speaking to the then director at
Speaker 4: the time, James CATCHI of the program. I wound up
Speaker 4: running where he looked at me and he said, look,
Speaker 4: you know, I'm just going to ask you, frankly and bluntly,
Speaker 4: what do you think about UFOs, and I thought for
Speaker 4: a moment, I looked at him, and I told the truth.
Speaker 4: I said, I don't. He said, well, what do you
Speaker 4: mean you don't think they're real? I said, no, you
Speaker 4: didn't ask me that. You asked me what I thought
Speaker 4: about them, And my honest response is I don't. I
Speaker 4: don't have time to think about them. I'm too involved
Speaker 4: in national security issues and whatnot, so I don't really
Speaker 4: have an opinion. And truth be told, when I was younger,
Speaker 4: I was never really into science fiction as a kid.
Speaker 4: I wasn't a Star Wars kid. You know, if you
Speaker 4: were to ask me, I was probably more of a
Speaker 4: Gigo type of kid than I was Star Wars. So
Speaker 4: I wasn't into science fiction. But once I got into
Speaker 4: the program, which everybody now knows is called a TIP,
Speaker 4: the Advanced Aerospace Threat Identification Program in the Department of Defense.
Speaker 4: We love our we love our acronyms, but anyways, the
Speaker 4: short version of that is called a TIP. That's where
Speaker 4: I learned the reality that our government, your government, our
Speaker 4: tax pair dollars, are going on a regular basis to
Speaker 4: study and investigate UFOs, despite the public discussion and our
Speaker 4: statements to the contrary saying that they're nonsense and we
Speaker 4: don't really look at them and we don't waste taxpair
Speaker 4: money on it. The fact is we did, and we're
Speaker 4: doing it a lot, and we were finding some very
Speaker 4: very interesting things that quite frankly amount to nothing less
Speaker 4: than any national security issue. Again, we can go on
Speaker 4: for as long as you want about that, but that's
Speaker 4: really how I got into the program. I often tell
Speaker 4: people half jokingly, before I got into ah If, I
Speaker 4: couldn't even spell ufo. But it turns out that it's
Speaker 4: a very very serious topic and our government considers it
Speaker 4: a significant national security issue.
Speaker 1: Maybe explain to people because it's the common vernacular is ufo,
Speaker 1: but it's also UAP, which is the more common vernacular
Speaker 1: among people that study this correct.
Speaker 4: Well, there's actually two reasons why we don't really use
Speaker 4: the term UFO anymore. First of all, there's a lot
Speaker 4: of stigma that tends to be associated with the word UFO.
Speaker 4: Moment you say ufo, you think of cheesy nineteen fifties
Speaker 4: movies with kidfoil hats, and you know, slogans like Elvis
Speaker 4: on the mother Ship, and so there's a lot of
Speaker 4: stigma involved with that. And then secondly, the fact is
Speaker 4: is that as we understand more about this phenomenon, we
Speaker 4: realize that they're not really flying. The turn the UFO
Speaker 4: isn't even accurate. And what do I mean by that?
Speaker 4: Because the F and UFO means fine unidentified flying object
Speaker 4: and it's easy to jump to conclusions when you see
Speaker 4: something in the sky that is technically flying, But the
Speaker 4: reality is flight is a combination of four fundamental forces.
Speaker 4: You have thrust, lift, dragon weight, and when you can
Speaker 4: create a lifting body or a wing, you create lift
Speaker 4: and therefore you fly. The object we are seeing don't
Speaker 4: seem to have the associated technology that we normally assume
Speaker 4: with flight. Mean there's no wings, there's no control surfaces,
Speaker 4: there's no obvious forms of propulsion. So yes, they're in
Speaker 4: the sky, but they're not probably not even really flying
Speaker 4: in a sense that we associate the term with flight.
Speaker 4: And the secondly, we also notice these things out in
Speaker 4: low earth orbit, as you just mentioned right now with
Speaker 4: the Apollo missions, we notice them even underwater. They call
Speaker 4: them usos. So the term UAP unidentified anomalist phenomenon was
Speaker 4: it was changed from UFO to UAP because we're seeing
Speaker 4: these things not just in our skies. We're seeing them underwater,
Speaker 4: we're seeing them again in a low Earth orbit environment.
Speaker 4: We're seeing them everywhere, So they're not just there in
Speaker 4: our sky. And secondly, they're not really flying in a
Speaker 4: sense that we would normally attribute to the notion of flying.
Speaker 1: Let me let me ask you this because part of
Speaker 1: the newly released files include footage and probably more people
Speaker 1: have seen this than anything else of what is an
Speaker 1: eight pointed It kind of looks like a star and
Speaker 1: it's submitted by Central Command personnel showing it's rather strange shaped,
Speaker 1: and it lasts nearly two minutes and shot from an
Speaker 1: infrared sensor aboard a US military platform, and it depicts
Speaker 1: an area of contrast resembling an eight pointed star. Now,
Speaker 1: one of the things that you know when we talk
Speaker 1: about unidentified aerial phenomenon as it's called, and what we
Speaker 1: see is a maneuverability and what is obviously different energy sources,
Speaker 1: in other words, things that defy physics as we know it.
Speaker 1: In other words, a level of science and a level
Speaker 1: level of power being generated maneuvers that are just not
Speaker 1: possible for anything that we are technically capable of creating.
Speaker 3: On this planet. That's what makes it so phenomenal to me.
Speaker 4: Yeah, you're You're absolutely right, Sean. In fact, there was
Speaker 4: some when I was in a top there was a
Speaker 4: very famous incident that we use as kind of the
Speaker 4: gold standard, if you will, for for UAP encounters regarding
Speaker 4: military personnel and whatnot. And it was in two thousand
Speaker 4: and four in the November timeframe, and it's now pointed
Speaker 4: as the USS Nimits incident, or they'll call it the
Speaker 4: tic Tech incident. But in essence, you had objects that
Speaker 4: were being tracked for days by the Spy one radar
Speaker 4: which was on the USS Princeton at the time, while
Speaker 4: the USS mimics was going out and doing carrier workups
Speaker 4: basically to go out they do these military style drills
Speaker 4: and kind of play you know, war games before they
Speaker 4: prepare to go out to the Middle East in a
Speaker 4: real deployment. And for many days it was being encountered
Speaker 4: these these objects that we could track at eighty thousand
Speaker 4: feet now that we were probably higher, but that was
Speaker 4: at the time the limitation of our capability with really
Speaker 4: any fidelity with this state of the art radar system
Speaker 4: called called the Spy one radar and so we're picking
Speaker 4: up these objects coming in and out of out of
Speaker 4: around eight thousand feet and within instant, and I mean
Speaker 4: literally an instant dropping down fifty feet over the water
Speaker 4: and then popping right back up again to that same
Speaker 4: altitude their original altitude. Now, why is that a big deal. Well,
Speaker 4: because it was assessed by some of the scientists that
Speaker 4: in order to go from eighty thousand feet and zero
Speaker 4: point seven seconds, which is what they calculated, to fifty
Speaker 4: feet over the water and then pop back up again
Speaker 4: would take something like three times the annual energy output
Speaker 4: of the entire continental United States. So we're talking about
Speaker 4: things that we quite frankly can't replicate. In many ways
Speaker 4: we still don't quite understand fully. And more importantly, we
Speaker 4: are seeing these EUAP with a very interesting curiosity of
Speaker 4: our military equities, and more specifically, our nuclear equities are
Speaker 4: nuclear technology, nuclear propulsion, nuclear power, nuclear weapon systems, to
Speaker 4: the point where they've actually these UAP have interfered with
Speaker 4: our nuclear readiness in the past.
Speaker 1: All right, quick break right back more. Lou Elisondo. He's
Speaker 1: in the great film. It's a great documentary. It's on
Speaker 1: Prime It's called Agia Disclosure. Now with the release of
Speaker 1: what was the first of many on UAP's Unidentified Aerial
Speaker 1: phenomenon formerly called UFOs. This release is pretty spectacular. He
Speaker 1: knows more about it the most anybody on the planet.
Speaker 1: More with Lou on the other side, eight hundred and
Speaker 1: ninety four one, Shawn our number if you want to
Speaker 1: be a part of the program as we continue.
Speaker 6: Shawan's got more behind the scenes information.
Speaker 1: More contacts than anybody, more friends behind the curtains. Sean
Speaker 1: Hannity is on on I Depending with Luis Alessanda. He's
Speaker 1: the former head of the Pentagon program, responsible for the
Speaker 1: investigation into UAP, and also the author of Imminent Inside
Speaker 1: the Pentagon's Hunt for UFOs. He's also all over the
Speaker 1: documentary Age of Disclosure. You know, there was an interesting
Speaker 1: observation because one of the things that these files revealed
Speaker 1: is in the year that they kind of set as
Speaker 1: the year that they had the most discoveries was nineteen
Speaker 1: sixty five, and in other words, the number the greatest
Speaker 1: number of quote sightings that they observed. And you go
Speaker 1: back and you look at these files and they talk
Speaker 1: about witnesses and what they report seeing, and that they
Speaker 1: actually report that there was a landing of one of
Speaker 1: these UAPs, we'll call it that. You know, I'm kind
Speaker 1: of like you. I just I kind of followed it,
Speaker 1: but I didn't really pay that much attention to it.
Speaker 1: But the more I did delve into it, the more
Speaker 1: fascinated I am by it, and the more again I'm
Speaker 1: coming to believe that this is not an accident that
Speaker 1: so many people are describing these things.
Speaker 4: Yeah, You're absolutely right, Sean. There is a very interesting
Speaker 4: commonality that we have seen over the years, decades in
Speaker 4: fact of these objects, and in fact, it may even
Speaker 4: go back centuries, believe it or not. Now, you know,
Speaker 4: I'm an older guy, but I was not. Truthfully, I
Speaker 4: wasn't around for the nineteen forties when Allied pilots first
Speaker 4: started reporting these anomalies. They called food fighters when they
Speaker 4: were either going on a mission or coming back. But
Speaker 4: anybody can look it up and see the term foo fighters.
Speaker 4: And these objects were described as luinis balls that seem
Speaker 4: to be intelligently controlled following their aircraft from time to time,
Speaker 4: and it was seen by many, many, many pilots, and
Speaker 4: of course you had afterwards the famous Roswell incident in
Speaker 4: New Mexico, which by the way was a very real incident. Now,
Speaker 4: my time was really more or less in the information
Speaker 4: we had access to. With most Fidelli really the sixties
Speaker 4: to seventies, the eighties and nineties and into the present time,
Speaker 4: what we were seeing were objects and timber sets. Actually correct,
Speaker 4: there are millions of documents. In fact, there was a
Speaker 4: recent statement made by the Department of War under Heacsept
Speaker 4: where he said, you have to keep in mind that
Speaker 4: there are tens of millions of these documents in the
Speaker 4: US government's possession, and it's going to take some time
Speaker 4: for us to review them all, but we will be
Speaker 4: releasing them in tranches. Now, this is the first time
Speaker 4: you had a government official admitting that the US government
Speaker 4: has UFO information like this to the tens of millions,
Speaker 4: not just one or two, and that a lot of
Speaker 4: these are really only in paper form, which means a
Speaker 4: lot are going way way back to the forties and
Speaker 4: fifties and sixties. And I know that to be true
Speaker 4: myself because I actually had my hands on some of
Speaker 4: these documents when I was at the Pentagon and my
Speaker 4: team did, and they're very, very compelling. And back to
Speaker 4: your original question about you know, the commonality. We've been
Speaker 4: seeing a commonality in morphology now for many years. So
Speaker 4: a lot of people are familiar with the disc shaped
Speaker 4: vehicle or what they might call it in the vernacular
Speaker 4: of flying saucer. But the reality is is that there's
Speaker 4: cigar shapes, there's these enormous triangular shaped vehicles that are
Speaker 4: often seen. In fact, there's a massa photo taken from
Speaker 4: the surface of the Moon where they may have just
Speaker 4: caught one of these triangular vehicles on camera from the
Speaker 4: surface of the Moon, and you can see that for yourself.
Speaker 1: All right, quick break right back more with lou Elizondo.
Speaker 1: He's in the great film. It's a great documentary. It's
Speaker 1: on Prime. It's called Age of Disclosure. Now with the
Speaker 1: release of what was the first of many on UAPs
Speaker 1: Unidentified aerial phenomenon form called UFOs, this release is pretty spectacular.
Speaker 1: He knows more about it the most anybody on the planet.
Speaker 6: Exposing government waste and abuse of your liberties every day.
Speaker 3: Sean Hannity is on right now.
Speaker 1: All right, we continue our final moments and we'll get
Speaker 1: to your calls. Eight hundred and ninety four one Shawn
Speaker 1: with Lou Elizondo, former head of the Pentagon Program responsible
Speaker 1: for the investigation into UAPs, and he's he's featured extensively
Speaker 1: in the documentary Age of Disclosure. This upon the release
Speaker 1: of what is the first of what will be many
Speaker 1: leases on UAPs formerly known as UFOs by the White
Speaker 1: House this past week, and it's fascinating what they're releasing.
Speaker 1: The thing that really stands out to me is people
Speaker 1: that have enormous credibility. These This is not a group
Speaker 1: of nut jobs. For example, if people watch and I
Speaker 1: strongly recommend they watch Age of Disclosure, which you can
Speaker 1: get on Prime Video, you know you're all over this
Speaker 1: and you just exude this, you know, rational reasonable persona
Speaker 1: that is like, I know, I read it, I saw it,
Speaker 1: and no, this was not my wheelhouse until I actually
Speaker 1: looked at the real science and the real evidence behind it.
Speaker 1: And we better pay attention to it. And maybe there's
Speaker 1: something we can learn from all of this, because I
Speaker 1: don't think there's any doubt. And I'll ask you one
Speaker 1: last question, and that is if if whatever this is,
Speaker 1: if it is in fact real, and they have the
Speaker 1: ability to make it here and they're not how to
Speaker 1: attack us, because if they wanted to attack us, they
Speaker 1: already would have, and they have power sources that we
Speaker 1: know not of. They would have probably conquered us in
Speaker 1: next to no time, and we would all know in
Speaker 1: a different way. Maybe it's just curiosity on their end.
Speaker 1: Maybe it's that there's a lot that ultimately we can
Speaker 1: learn from this that would better the human condition. And
Speaker 1: I look at it from that standpoint. I wanted to
Speaker 1: get your final.
Speaker 3: Thought on that.
Speaker 4: I think you're absolutely right, Sean, and in fact, you
Speaker 4: know I tend to look at as things from an
Speaker 4: optimistic and opportunity perspective. I do think there's a lot
Speaker 4: we can still learn we've quite frankly, and I got
Speaker 4: to be careful what I say because I still do
Speaker 4: have a security clearance. You're absolutely right. There's a lot
Speaker 4: of stuff we have learned though ready, and that you know,
Speaker 4: if you look at them, make it very quickly. But
Speaker 4: if you look back at the at the original Apollo
Speaker 4: missions to the Moon, some six thousand, two hundred life
Speaker 4: changing technologies emerged from that little space decade long space
Speaker 4: race with the right.
Speaker 1: More than paid for itself because of the discoveries you're describing.
Speaker 4: Yes, sir, absolutely absolutely so. I agree with you completely Sean.
Speaker 4: I think there's a lot of opportunity here. If we
Speaker 4: can just get rid of the stigma and taboo, I
Speaker 4: think we're going to be in much better shape.
Speaker 1: And I'll add one thing, even going back, I mentioned
Speaker 1: Apollo seventeen, Apollo eleven. You know, buzz Aldron, for example,
Speaker 1: recalled several unusual phenomenon that was part of the first release,
Speaker 1: also that he and his crew encountered during the first
Speaker 1: moon landing according to these documents. And again, this is
Speaker 1: just the tip of the iceberg. Anyway, It's called Aged Disclosure.
Speaker 1: It's on Prime. I urge you to watch it. Luis
Speaker 1: Elizondo's all over it, hanging, and Tim Burschett is all
Speaker 1: over it. Marco Rubio's all over it. And when you
Speaker 1: hear their comments and the comments and the credibility of
Speaker 1: all the other people that are interviewed in it, I
Speaker 1: think you'll come to a very interesting conclusion that maybe
Speaker 1: you're not anticipating. I really do appreciate your work, your time,
Speaker 1: and I hope to I hope we talk more about
Speaker 1: this in the future. I expect a lot more informations
Speaker 1: coming out in the days, weeks, months ahead.
Speaker 4: Yes, sir, and I appreciate you. Sean, thank you very much,
Speaker 4: and your audience, thank you so.
Speaker 1: Much for all right, my friend, thank you. Eight hundred
Speaker 1: and nine to four one. Shawn is on number. If
Speaker 1: you want to be a part of the program. All right,
Speaker 1: let us say hello to John and San Diego, California,
Speaker 1: Gavin's communist utopia.
Speaker 3: What is up? John? Glad you called Happy Monday, sir?
Speaker 7: Okay, Sean. A couple of days ago, that idiot aoc
Speaker 7: mouth talk about you can't become a billionaire by earning it. Well,
Speaker 7: you've got Steven Spielberg, George Lucas, Michael Jordan, Taylor swift
Speaker 7: leron James. It's really not that hard to earn a
Speaker 7: billion dollars as an employee. What is difficult, though, is
Speaker 7: to make a hundred billion dollars. You can't earn that.
Speaker 7: You have to create it out of nothing, which is
Speaker 7: much harder than getting paid by someone else a billion dollars.
Speaker 7: So she doesn't know anything about economics, yet somehow she
Speaker 7: has an economics degree from Boston College, so that school
Speaker 7: needs to be investigated for its fraud.
Speaker 1: Well, I know you're talking about AOC and her comments,
Speaker 1: but her coments go further, and it's interesting she doesn't
Speaker 1: deny that she has twenty twenty eight ambitions, but then
Speaker 1: she goes on to explain to I guess she's talking
Speaker 1: to David Axelrod, that her ambition is to change the
Speaker 1: country dramatically, which we already know. This is what the
Speaker 1: radical left. This is why, you know, we started the
Speaker 1: program today telling you, you know, how sick the Democrats
Speaker 1: are after the state court decision on their unconstitutional gerrymandering
Speaker 1: attempts in the Commonwealth of Virginia, you know. And then
Speaker 1: she doubles down on this idiocy that billionaires you know, uh,
Speaker 1: you know, didn't do it on their own. And then
Speaker 1: she goes even further and says that the American Revolution
Speaker 1: was against billionaires.
Speaker 3: Of their time.
Speaker 1: And now that's not why the American Revolution was fought.
Speaker 1: It was fought to secure independence from Great Britain. It
Speaker 1: was it was sought to establish self governance. They were
Speaker 1: underlying causes behind that conflict, oh, you know, like things
Speaker 1: that you learned in school, like taxation without representation and
Speaker 1: the Stamp Act and the Townsend Acts and the Tea
Speaker 1: Act and the you know, the British attempts to gain
Speaker 1: greater control over their colony. And guess what it You know,
Speaker 1: then of course you have skirmishes like at Lexington and
Speaker 1: common Cord mark the start of the fighting and the
Speaker 1: shot heard around the world, and you know, culminating in
Speaker 1: the Declaration of Independence, et cetera, et cetera. Uh, nobody
Speaker 1: mentioned oligarchs and billionaires.
Speaker 3: I mean, I.
Speaker 1: Mean, this is like exhibit a of of how our
Speaker 1: public school system is is failing us. And if her
Speaker 1: ambition is way bigger than being president, just know what
Speaker 1: that means. Understand what this means That AOC wants her
Speaker 1: Green New Deal, radical socialism, defund the police, defund the
Speaker 1: Department of Homeland Security. Uh, you know, confiscate wealth from
Speaker 1: people that that's what they want, and what they're doing
Speaker 1: in Virginia is exactly what they want.
Speaker 7: So there's one more there's one more thing. The billionaires
Speaker 7: of the time, those were the founding fathers and they're
Speaker 7: the ones who started the revolution.
Speaker 1: Oh and by the way, most of them died poor,
Speaker 1: most of them lost their fortunes.
Speaker 7: They were the equivalents of billionaires when they started the revolution.
Speaker 7: And also this is why the Democrats always say we're
Speaker 7: a democracy instead of a constitutional republic, because without that
Speaker 7: constitution in Virginia, we would have that ridiculous Supreme Court.
Speaker 1: Now listen, look at what they're trying to do today.
Speaker 1: As I mentioned earlier, you raised a lot of good points.
Speaker 1: This is why this election matters, this midterm election. I'm
Speaker 1: not asking anybody to do anything other than committing your mind,
Speaker 1: your heart, and your soul that this is the most
Speaker 1: important midterm election ye're in your life, that this is
Speaker 1: the radical left's agenda, this is what they would do
Speaker 1: if they got power, And just make a commitment that
Speaker 1: you're not going to give it to them, and that
Speaker 1: they're going to lose, and we're going to defy historical
Speaker 1: trends anyway. John san Diego, thank you, George in Texas. George,
Speaker 1: you're on the Sean Hannity Show. God bless Texas, Sir,
Speaker 1: glad you called.
Speaker 2: Thank you, Sean, pledge you to meet you, just to
Speaker 2: get started. I think China is the US's main adversary.
Speaker 2: You know, there's something inherently wrong when a nation like Taiwan,
Speaker 2: who doesn't want anything to do with them, and you
Speaker 2: have China saying it's our country. So right there, it's flawed.
Speaker 2: Another thing. You know, they're complaining about US hedge of me.
Speaker 2: I mean they want to control free sovereign nations. So
Speaker 2: I don't even know where their argument is. Number two,
Speaker 2: I think they have to be contained. I mean, they
Speaker 2: don't innovate. There's a lot of intellectual theft.
Speaker 1: In terms of intellectual property, theft is through the roof.
Speaker 1: I know somebody in business that has had every single
Speaker 1: patent he's ever gotten on his own, He's brilliant, stolen
Speaker 1: from him by the Chinese everyone, and there's nothing you
Speaker 1: can do.
Speaker 2: They invited Tesla into the country, right, Oh, come on in,
Speaker 2: we'll open it up, you'll get through. The bureocracy will
Speaker 2: set it up. So what they do. Tesla goes in
Speaker 2: and then they learn from Tesla. They adopt all their manufacturing,
Speaker 2: the trade secrets, the patents, and then they kick them
Speaker 2: out and they coffee and imitate electric cars, and then
Speaker 2: they start to dominate. So getting back to all this,
Speaker 2: you know, I think Trump is kind of kind of smart.
Speaker 2: He kind of blows a lot of smoke up, jeez,
Speaker 2: you know what, And I don't think he I don't
Speaker 2: think sincerely Trump really is is that enamored with him.
Speaker 2: I think he does that to flatter him, maybe to
Speaker 2: get the better of him during negotiation. But I know
Speaker 2: you're going there, and I'm just curious your view on it,
Speaker 2: what you hope to accomplish. And you know, it's a
Speaker 2: delicate situation because you know they're a vital part of
Speaker 2: the world's global economy. But how do you dance around it?
Speaker 2: What kind of deals do we look for there?
Speaker 1: Well, the one thing you can be assured of is
Speaker 1: Donald Trump doesn't men's words, all right. And now it's
Speaker 1: interesting that you know some of the I know, for example,
Speaker 1: Elon Musk will be there, Tim Cook will be there.
Speaker 1: Think of Blackrock will be there, Steve Schwartzman will be there.
Speaker 1: You know, the head of Cisco's will be there. Ge
Speaker 1: Aerospace will be there, Goldman Sachs will be there, Master
Speaker 1: Card will be there, Meta will be there, Visa will
Speaker 1: be there.
Speaker 3: You know, Elon Musk, I think he may be on
Speaker 3: Air Force one. I don't know. I have no idea.
Speaker 3: You know.
Speaker 1: The good news is is I get to talk to
Speaker 1: and meet a lot of these people and hopefully get
Speaker 1: some interviews with some of them and get to you know,
Speaker 1: let you hear directly from them. You know, I look
Speaker 1: at it as an opportunity when push came to shove. Yes,
Speaker 1: I will miss time on the air. I don't like
Speaker 1: that part of it. The other part of it is
Speaker 1: I can report directly what I see going on, and
Speaker 1: they include me in everything, which is very gracious of them.
Speaker 1: So you know, I'll be able to I'll be able
Speaker 1: to give you a front row seat in terms of
Speaker 1: a lot of what's going on.
Speaker 3: Okay, you know what worries me a bit?
Speaker 2: Is it critical? I mean when you look at the
Speaker 2: terriffs when Trump sort of imposed terraffs, they said, well,
Speaker 2: we're going to restrict critical minerals. That is such an
Speaker 2: achilles skill for the US. What's your view?
Speaker 1: Not much longer? We're discovering more and more critical minerals,
Speaker 1: I know, the ones you're referring to right here in
Speaker 1: the US and with our other partners around the world,
Speaker 1: and we are bypassing and we will surpass China on
Speaker 1: the issue of critical minerals that I can that I
Speaker 1: can tell you. Okay, it's something I've I've talked to
Speaker 1: a lot of people about, you know, but you're right,
Speaker 1: as of today, you're one hundred percent correct. Anyway, my friend,
Speaker 1: appreciate it.
Speaker 6: Up. The final hour roundup is next. You do not
Speaker 6: want to miss it, and stay tuned for the final
Speaker 6: hour free for all on the Sean Hannity Show.
Speaker 1: We're gonna have Scott Perry in the final hour free
Speaker 1: for all of this program today. And the President went
Speaker 1: out there and said he wants to get rid of,
Speaker 1: at least temporarily, the federal gas tax.
Speaker 3: Here is what he said.
Speaker 5: Yeah, I'm gonna reduce until the let me tell you,
Speaker 5: as soon as this is over with arn, as soon
Speaker 5: as it's over, you're going to see gasoline and oil
Speaker 5: drop like a rock, going to be dropping down like
Speaker 5: a rock. I mean already, look just on the basis
Speaker 5: of you know, things have happened when it first came
Speaker 5: about twenty of the okay men of Armouse, it's a lot,
Speaker 5: but you know, with time, it's like they're going to Texas,
Speaker 5: they're going to Louisiana, they're going to Alaska, a lot
Speaker 5: of Alaska and Alaska's you know, so it seems like
Speaker 5: very far away from the from Asia, but it's actually
Speaker 5: a relatively short trip by comparison to other locations. They
Speaker 5: have to go to to get and they go to Alaska.
Speaker 5: In fact, our big problem is we're building bigger docks, docking,
Speaker 5: you know, doctor Phillips. But we have, we've become very
Speaker 5: bigger in the filling station.
Speaker 1: Got Perry, Pennsylvania. We'll weigh in on that and much
Speaker 1: more and how to get rid of other costs related
Speaker 1: to casoline on the other side.
Speaker 3: As we continue