WEBVTT - Has our solar system lost any planets?

0:00:08.480 --> 0:00:10.680
<v Speaker 1>Hey, Daniel, what pets do you have these days?

0:00:10.800 --> 0:00:13.119
<v Speaker 2>Oh, we just have our rescue dog, Peppito.

0:00:14.080 --> 0:00:16.680
<v Speaker 1>Haven't you had other pets in the past, like rodents.

0:00:17.680 --> 0:00:19.680
<v Speaker 2>We did have rats for a time, and we actually

0:00:19.680 --> 0:00:20.800
<v Speaker 2>had cats before that.

0:00:21.320 --> 0:00:23.680
<v Speaker 1>Oh what happened Pepito?

0:00:23.880 --> 0:00:29.040
<v Speaker 2>Ate them? No, we've never had a pet eat another pet.

0:00:29.080 --> 0:00:30.520
<v Speaker 2>We've only lost them to old age.

0:00:30.840 --> 0:00:33.240
<v Speaker 1>Old age. All that dark chocolate and big goods in

0:00:33.280 --> 0:00:35.520
<v Speaker 1>your house just did them in with the heart attack.

0:00:37.440 --> 0:00:40.320
<v Speaker 2>We don't feed dark chocolate at the dog, but everybody

0:00:40.360 --> 0:00:42.200
<v Speaker 2>does eat pretty well at our house.

0:00:42.800 --> 0:00:44.680
<v Speaker 1>Unless you like white chocolate, then your starved.

0:00:44.840 --> 0:00:46.560
<v Speaker 2>You know. If that's the reason you run away from home,

0:00:46.640 --> 0:00:48.479
<v Speaker 2>then maybe you never were really a white sun.

0:00:48.640 --> 0:00:50.440
<v Speaker 1>Wait, if you don't like white chocolate, you're not a

0:00:50.479 --> 0:00:53.520
<v Speaker 1>white son. It sounds like a white lie.

0:00:53.720 --> 0:01:10.280
<v Speaker 2>I have a dark secret. Hi.

0:01:10.280 --> 0:01:12.560
<v Speaker 1>I am Poor hammy cartoonists and the author of Oliver's

0:01:12.600 --> 0:01:13.600
<v Speaker 1>Great Big Universe.

0:01:13.880 --> 0:01:17.119
<v Speaker 2>Hi. I'm Daniel. I'm a particle physicist and a professor

0:01:17.200 --> 0:01:20.280
<v Speaker 2>at UC Irvine, and I will not waiver in my

0:01:20.400 --> 0:01:21.440
<v Speaker 2>campaign for dark.

0:01:21.319 --> 0:01:25.520
<v Speaker 1>Chocolate, Dark chocolate, dark matter. You're just a very dark physicist.

0:01:27.720 --> 0:01:29.440
<v Speaker 2>I'm trying to bring light to the world at the

0:01:29.480 --> 0:01:32.319
<v Speaker 2>same time as exposed all the dark secrets of the universe.

0:01:32.680 --> 0:01:35.679
<v Speaker 1>Oh, you're trying to expose dark matter. I thought you

0:01:35.720 --> 0:01:37.600
<v Speaker 1>were all about letting the universe.

0:01:37.240 --> 0:01:40.560
<v Speaker 2>Be Absolutely not. I do not believe in universe privacy.

0:01:40.680 --> 0:01:42.080
<v Speaker 1>You're like the universe paparazzi.

0:01:42.959 --> 0:01:45.080
<v Speaker 2>That's exactly right, except I'm not selling it to the

0:01:45.160 --> 0:01:47.520
<v Speaker 2>national inquirer. I'm just publishing papers.

0:01:47.720 --> 0:01:52.520
<v Speaker 1>Well, your buyer is the cosmological inquirer, the human inquirer.

0:01:55.120 --> 0:01:56.680
<v Speaker 2>Inquiring brains want to know.

0:01:57.160 --> 0:01:59.360
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, do you stand outside their home, like, Hey, dark

0:01:59.400 --> 0:02:02.640
<v Speaker 1>matter over here, over here snapping pictures?

0:02:03.040 --> 0:02:05.240
<v Speaker 2>If I knew where dark matter lived, I would definitely

0:02:05.280 --> 0:02:06.800
<v Speaker 2>go there with my dark matter camera.

0:02:06.840 --> 0:02:09.040
<v Speaker 1>I thought dark matter was all around us. It lives

0:02:09.080 --> 0:02:13.079
<v Speaker 1>in us and within us. It surrounds us and binds

0:02:13.080 --> 0:02:13.919
<v Speaker 1>the galaxy together.

0:02:14.160 --> 0:02:16.720
<v Speaker 2>You're absolutely right, it's everywhere. We just don't know how

0:02:16.800 --> 0:02:17.680
<v Speaker 2>to take a picture of it.

0:02:17.919 --> 0:02:20.400
<v Speaker 1>But anyways, welcome to our podcast, Daniel and Jorge Explain

0:02:20.480 --> 0:02:23.240
<v Speaker 1>the Universe, a production of iHeartRadio.

0:02:22.639 --> 0:02:25.800
<v Speaker 2>In which we join our inquiring minds with yours to

0:02:25.960 --> 0:02:29.280
<v Speaker 2>wonder together about the nature of the universe, to think

0:02:29.320 --> 0:02:33.040
<v Speaker 2>deeply about how everything comes together to make the cosmos

0:02:33.040 --> 0:02:35.639
<v Speaker 2>and the night sky that we appreciate to think about

0:02:35.639 --> 0:02:38.880
<v Speaker 2>how the tiniest little particles and the most massive black

0:02:38.880 --> 0:02:41.919
<v Speaker 2>holes shape the very world we live in, and whether

0:02:42.040 --> 0:02:43.600
<v Speaker 2>it has always looked this way.

0:02:43.680 --> 0:02:46.280
<v Speaker 1>That's right. We satisfy our curiosity for stars and what

0:02:46.320 --> 0:02:48.600
<v Speaker 1>they're doing with their lives, and we take pictures and

0:02:48.680 --> 0:02:51.760
<v Speaker 1>also sound recordings of what's out there in the universe

0:02:51.800 --> 0:02:54.239
<v Speaker 1>and what's going on to maybe get a clue about

0:02:54.280 --> 0:02:55.280
<v Speaker 1>how it all works.

0:02:55.360 --> 0:02:57.639
<v Speaker 2>We'd like to figure out the fundamental nature of the

0:02:57.720 --> 0:03:00.680
<v Speaker 2>universal laws that everything follows. But I also like to

0:03:00.720 --> 0:03:04.200
<v Speaker 2>know the story of the universe. What happened, How did

0:03:04.280 --> 0:03:07.200
<v Speaker 2>we end up where we are? How long have things

0:03:07.280 --> 0:03:09.640
<v Speaker 2>looked this way for? How long can we rely on

0:03:09.720 --> 0:03:11.960
<v Speaker 2>things to look this way? Do we live in a

0:03:12.000 --> 0:03:14.560
<v Speaker 2>momentary blip of the universe or is this a long

0:03:14.680 --> 0:03:15.360
<v Speaker 2>term trend?

0:03:15.639 --> 0:03:17.760
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, looking at our past is a way to look

0:03:17.800 --> 0:03:19.960
<v Speaker 1>into our future. We can try to deduce. But the

0:03:20.040 --> 0:03:22.280
<v Speaker 1>rules of the universe are and what they might mean

0:03:22.320 --> 0:03:24.320
<v Speaker 1>for us in the deep future? What is going to

0:03:24.360 --> 0:03:26.720
<v Speaker 1>be the future of humanity here in our solar system?

0:03:26.840 --> 0:03:29.040
<v Speaker 1>Can we call this our home for the next few

0:03:29.040 --> 0:03:29.680
<v Speaker 1>billion years?

0:03:31.480 --> 0:03:32.919
<v Speaker 2>Are you not planning to move out of that house

0:03:32.919 --> 0:03:34.800
<v Speaker 2>for a few billion years, so your kids can always

0:03:34.800 --> 0:03:36.840
<v Speaker 2>come home and their kids and their kids and their kids.

0:03:36.880 --> 0:03:38.880
<v Speaker 1>Well, we're kind of just squatting in this solar system,

0:03:38.960 --> 0:03:41.280
<v Speaker 1>right like we just popped in here, started living here.

0:03:41.640 --> 0:03:44.920
<v Speaker 1>We didn't ask if anyone owned these planets. What if

0:03:44.960 --> 0:03:46.760
<v Speaker 1>the real owners come back when they they're like, what

0:03:46.960 --> 0:03:49.400
<v Speaker 1>is going on here? Call pest control.

0:03:50.440 --> 0:03:52.200
<v Speaker 2>Don't we have some sort of like solar B and

0:03:52.200 --> 0:03:57.520
<v Speaker 2>B contract squatter rights. Maybe exactly after one hundred million years,

0:03:57.560 --> 0:04:00.200
<v Speaker 2>we're officially allowed to call ourselves the owners. It's a

0:04:00.200 --> 0:04:02.800
<v Speaker 2>good question how long things have looked this way. When

0:04:02.840 --> 0:04:04.640
<v Speaker 2>you look by the night guy, you expect to see

0:04:04.680 --> 0:04:07.120
<v Speaker 2>basically the same stars as you did a year ago,

0:04:07.240 --> 0:04:09.440
<v Speaker 2>and you know that you're looking at roughly the same

0:04:09.520 --> 0:04:12.600
<v Speaker 2>stars that Newton looked at, and the Egyptians looked at

0:04:12.640 --> 0:04:15.880
<v Speaker 2>and the Sumerians looked at thousands of years ago. But

0:04:15.960 --> 0:04:18.320
<v Speaker 2>the Solar system operates on a very different kind of

0:04:18.360 --> 0:04:21.919
<v Speaker 2>timescale than your life or even human civilization. And in

0:04:22.000 --> 0:04:24.720
<v Speaker 2>fast forward things don't seem so stable. They seem quite

0:04:24.839 --> 0:04:26.240
<v Speaker 2>chaotic and dynamic.

0:04:26.600 --> 0:04:28.359
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, when we were all kids, we learned in school

0:04:28.360 --> 0:04:30.400
<v Speaker 1>about the different planets in our solar system and how

0:04:30.440 --> 0:04:33.279
<v Speaker 1>many of there are. And that's basically the same story

0:04:33.279 --> 0:04:35.520
<v Speaker 1>that our kids are learning in school as well, right, Like,

0:04:35.560 --> 0:04:38.000
<v Speaker 1>it hasn't really changed so much, except maybe for Pluto.

0:04:39.320 --> 0:04:41.800
<v Speaker 2>We of course change what we mean by a planet

0:04:42.080 --> 0:04:45.120
<v Speaker 2>and make up new categories all the time. But you're right,

0:04:45.160 --> 0:04:48.120
<v Speaker 2>the stuff that's out there that we're seeing, whatever name

0:04:48.160 --> 0:04:51.120
<v Speaker 2>we give it, hasn't changed in our lifetime or in

0:04:51.160 --> 0:04:52.560
<v Speaker 2>our grandparents' lifetime.

0:04:52.760 --> 0:04:54.000
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, And so I guess you kind of get the

0:04:54.080 --> 0:04:56.839
<v Speaker 1>sense that maybe it will never change, you know, you

0:04:56.920 --> 0:04:59.599
<v Speaker 1>sort of memorize these facts and these things and think

0:04:59.600 --> 0:05:02.040
<v Speaker 1>that maybe it's going to be like that forever. But actually,

0:05:02.160 --> 0:05:04.040
<v Speaker 1>if you look at the grand scale of the Solar

0:05:04.040 --> 0:05:07.279
<v Speaker 1>System and the universe in or galaxy, things are rapidly changing.

0:05:07.320 --> 0:05:08.800
<v Speaker 1>If you look at it from that point of view.

0:05:08.839 --> 0:05:10.600
<v Speaker 2>If the Solar system changes, do you think we all

0:05:10.600 --> 0:05:12.440
<v Speaker 2>have to go back to elementary school to learn a

0:05:12.440 --> 0:05:13.040
<v Speaker 2>new mnemonic?

0:05:13.200 --> 0:05:15.240
<v Speaker 1>Oh, there's a mnemonic. I didn't grow up yours. I

0:05:15.279 --> 0:05:21.040
<v Speaker 1>don't know what do you use? Obviously the mnemonic did

0:05:21.080 --> 0:05:22.200
<v Speaker 1>it work because you don't remember it.

0:05:24.000 --> 0:05:26.000
<v Speaker 2>There's a lot of mnemonics to help you memorize the

0:05:26.080 --> 0:05:29.320
<v Speaker 2>order of the planets. One of them is my very

0:05:29.440 --> 0:05:36.720
<v Speaker 2>easy method just speeds up nothing. Mercury, Venus, Earth, Mars, Jupiter, Saturn, Urinus, Neptune.

0:05:36.880 --> 0:05:40.159
<v Speaker 1>Whoa, that is so not kit friendly. How many kids

0:05:40.320 --> 0:05:42.120
<v Speaker 1>use methods and have methods?

0:05:42.200 --> 0:05:44.080
<v Speaker 2>The history of them is actually really funny. There's ones

0:05:44.080 --> 0:05:47.719
<v Speaker 2>from the fifties that go like men very easily make jugs,

0:05:47.800 --> 0:05:48.719
<v Speaker 2>serve useful needs.

0:05:48.720 --> 0:05:52.440
<v Speaker 1>Perhaps, Oh man, I wonder why we'd stopped using that one.

0:05:52.920 --> 0:05:55.760
<v Speaker 2>And then a more recent one says, my very energetic

0:05:55.760 --> 0:05:58.159
<v Speaker 2>mother jumps skateboards under nana's patio.

0:05:58.320 --> 0:06:00.159
<v Speaker 1>Oh, there you go. That's a pretty good one, and

0:06:00.279 --> 0:06:01.919
<v Speaker 1>true as well for some people.

0:06:01.920 --> 0:06:05.719
<v Speaker 2>I'm sure my very educated mother just served us notches.

0:06:06.040 --> 0:06:07.560
<v Speaker 1>Oh that's an even tastier.

0:06:07.160 --> 0:06:11.320
<v Speaker 2>One, exactly. But the point is that though these things

0:06:11.360 --> 0:06:14.599
<v Speaker 2>have seemed stable for a long time, it's not necessarily

0:06:14.640 --> 0:06:16.200
<v Speaker 2>true that they always will be.

0:06:16.360 --> 0:06:18.400
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, things are always changing, And in fact, you can

0:06:18.440 --> 0:06:21.640
<v Speaker 1>ask the question of whether our solar SYSM had more

0:06:21.720 --> 0:06:22.920
<v Speaker 1>planets in the past.

0:06:23.160 --> 0:06:25.640
<v Speaker 2>It might be that the planets we know today are

0:06:25.720 --> 0:06:29.120
<v Speaker 2>not all the planets that have ever orbited our star.

0:06:29.240 --> 0:06:31.760
<v Speaker 1>And if we had more, what happened to them? So

0:06:31.839 --> 0:06:39.159
<v Speaker 1>today on the podcast will be tackling the question has

0:06:39.240 --> 0:06:43.480
<v Speaker 1>our Solar System lost any planets? That just seems kind

0:06:43.480 --> 0:06:45.880
<v Speaker 1>of irresponsible there. How can you lose a whole planet?

0:06:47.320 --> 0:06:49.000
<v Speaker 2>I mean I had it in my hands and then

0:06:49.040 --> 0:06:51.480
<v Speaker 2>I put my keys down and the last place.

0:06:51.440 --> 0:06:54.240
<v Speaker 1>Remember having that planet was on top of the dog.

0:06:56.000 --> 0:06:57.840
<v Speaker 2>Blamed the dog. Huh, that's the first thing.

0:06:58.640 --> 0:07:01.360
<v Speaker 1>The dog ate my planet. Classic excuse.

0:07:02.040 --> 0:07:04.600
<v Speaker 2>Or maybe it just went rogue because it needed to

0:07:04.640 --> 0:07:07.440
<v Speaker 2>find a white chocolate friendly Solar system. You know, maybe

0:07:07.480 --> 0:07:08.520
<v Speaker 2>it just didn't fit in here.

0:07:09.000 --> 0:07:12.640
<v Speaker 1>It just rebelled against your tyranny of trying to dictate

0:07:12.680 --> 0:07:14.680
<v Speaker 1>what kind of chocolate people should eat or feel good

0:07:14.720 --> 0:07:16.360
<v Speaker 1>about eating. Doctor, Why.

0:07:17.960 --> 0:07:20.760
<v Speaker 2>You call it tyranny, I call it wisdom. Let's call

0:07:20.760 --> 0:07:21.480
<v Speaker 2>the whole thing off.

0:07:22.080 --> 0:07:25.440
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, that's what I'll tyrn say at two. Yeah, So

0:07:25.480 --> 0:07:28.040
<v Speaker 1>it's been an interesting story of the Solar System. You

0:07:28.120 --> 0:07:30.080
<v Speaker 1>got to wonder if maybef we had more than nine

0:07:30.160 --> 0:07:32.320
<v Speaker 1>or eight planets in the past. Well, we definitely had

0:07:32.320 --> 0:07:34.840
<v Speaker 1>more planets to pay in the past before Pluto got downgraded.

0:07:34.880 --> 0:07:37.160
<v Speaker 1>But that's a separate story and a separate reason.

0:07:37.240 --> 0:07:37.400
<v Speaker 3>Right.

0:07:37.520 --> 0:07:39.960
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, Pluto is still there, it's just not called the

0:07:40.000 --> 0:07:42.400
<v Speaker 2>planet anymore. It's called a dwarf planet.

0:07:42.200 --> 0:07:44.720
<v Speaker 1>Right, But we can ask the question of whether our

0:07:44.720 --> 0:07:48.360
<v Speaker 1>solar system did really have other giant planets like Jupiter

0:07:48.480 --> 0:07:51.280
<v Speaker 1>or Mars or Venus, but maybe they decided they didn't

0:07:51.320 --> 0:07:51.720
<v Speaker 1>like it here.

0:07:51.760 --> 0:07:53.560
<v Speaker 2>It's really fun to dig into the history of the

0:07:53.600 --> 0:07:56.280
<v Speaker 2>Solar system and understand how we got here, how it

0:07:56.360 --> 0:07:58.360
<v Speaker 2>might have been different, and give us a sense for

0:07:58.440 --> 0:08:01.560
<v Speaker 2>what other solar systems out there are likely to look like.

0:08:01.720 --> 0:08:03.640
<v Speaker 1>So, as usual, we were wondering how many people had

0:08:03.680 --> 0:08:07.040
<v Speaker 1>thought about the question of whether our solar system lost

0:08:07.120 --> 0:08:10.800
<v Speaker 1>any planets, or at least misplaced them temporarily. Maybe, So,

0:08:10.840 --> 0:08:12.720
<v Speaker 1>as usual, Daniel went out there into the internet to

0:08:12.720 --> 0:08:16.560
<v Speaker 1>ask people has our Solar system lost any planets?

0:08:16.720 --> 0:08:19.280
<v Speaker 2>Thanks very much to our group of volunteers. We greatly

0:08:19.280 --> 0:08:21.640
<v Speaker 2>appreciate them, but we also would like to add you

0:08:21.760 --> 0:08:24.400
<v Speaker 2>to their ranks. Please don't be shy write to me

0:08:24.480 --> 0:08:27.400
<v Speaker 2>two questions at Danielanjorge dot com.

0:08:27.440 --> 0:08:29.160
<v Speaker 1>What do people get I know if they sign up.

0:08:29.160 --> 0:08:32.240
<v Speaker 2>The satisfaction of hearing their voice on the podcast and

0:08:32.480 --> 0:08:35.960
<v Speaker 2>a weekly injection of hard physics questions.

0:08:35.640 --> 0:08:38.240
<v Speaker 1>And also a monthly supply of white chocolate that gets

0:08:38.320 --> 0:08:39.120
<v Speaker 1>kicked out of your house.

0:08:39.280 --> 0:08:41.959
<v Speaker 2>I will send you exactly zero grams of white chocolate.

0:08:44.480 --> 0:08:46.480
<v Speaker 1>Well, think about it for a second. Do you think

0:08:46.520 --> 0:08:50.160
<v Speaker 1>our Solar System has lost any planets? Here's what people

0:08:50.160 --> 0:08:50.600
<v Speaker 1>had to say.

0:08:50.880 --> 0:08:52.760
<v Speaker 3>I don't know if we can know for sure, maybe

0:08:52.760 --> 0:08:55.079
<v Speaker 3>by the orbits of current planets, but I'd have to

0:08:55.120 --> 0:08:57.520
<v Speaker 3>assume given the five billion years or so that or

0:08:57.520 --> 0:08:59.360
<v Speaker 3>some spent around, that at least one planet has come

0:08:59.400 --> 0:09:02.160
<v Speaker 3>in and been kicked out. But maybe it depends on

0:09:02.200 --> 0:09:04.240
<v Speaker 3>if we consider those objects planets.

0:09:04.360 --> 0:09:07.480
<v Speaker 4>So I think that there have been planets knocked out

0:09:07.480 --> 0:09:10.560
<v Speaker 4>of the Solar System, especially since when the Solar System

0:09:10.640 --> 0:09:13.160
<v Speaker 4>was first created there would have been loads of rocks

0:09:13.160 --> 0:09:16.360
<v Speaker 4>flying around to form planets. So then there would have

0:09:16.360 --> 0:09:19.360
<v Speaker 4>been planets formed and then hit by maybe another planet

0:09:19.360 --> 0:09:20.720
<v Speaker 4>which knocked them out of the system.

0:09:20.880 --> 0:09:23.240
<v Speaker 5>Nothing that I know of, they're all accounted for. Some

0:09:23.280 --> 0:09:26.480
<v Speaker 5>of them have lost the designation planet, like Pluto. I

0:09:26.480 --> 0:09:31.160
<v Speaker 5>think regularly objects get flung out of Solar systems due

0:09:31.200 --> 0:09:32.559
<v Speaker 5>to gravitational interactions with.

0:09:32.559 --> 0:09:33.400
<v Speaker 2>Other own jobjects.

0:09:33.400 --> 0:09:36.959
<v Speaker 5>So I can imagine Jupiter getting tired of somesome little

0:09:37.000 --> 0:09:39.760
<v Speaker 5>planet and flinging it out. Maybe when we were forming

0:09:39.840 --> 0:09:41.920
<v Speaker 5>all the planets performing them. Some of them were close

0:09:41.920 --> 0:09:43.760
<v Speaker 5>to the Sun and got gabbled up. I'm curious to

0:09:43.800 --> 0:09:46.640
<v Speaker 5>know if there's any record of planets that we're here

0:09:46.679 --> 0:09:47.480
<v Speaker 5>in now or not.

0:09:47.720 --> 0:09:51.160
<v Speaker 6>Apart from the reclassification of Pluto as a dwarf planet,

0:09:51.240 --> 0:09:54.559
<v Speaker 6>meaning that we've effectively lost one planet, I have heard

0:09:54.640 --> 0:09:57.319
<v Speaker 6>rumors about a tenth planet, which would now be a

0:09:57.400 --> 0:10:01.400
<v Speaker 6>ninth planet, that potentially all within our inn a soda

0:10:01.400 --> 0:10:04.040
<v Speaker 6>system and then could have collided with Earth and created

0:10:04.080 --> 0:10:07.439
<v Speaker 6>the Moon and then spun off out into an orbit

0:10:07.679 --> 0:10:10.640
<v Speaker 6>way out in our outer Soder system. Other than that,

0:10:10.760 --> 0:10:12.280
<v Speaker 6>I'm unaware of any lost planets.

0:10:12.360 --> 0:10:15.440
<v Speaker 1>Interesting answers. It seems to be all over the place.

0:10:15.480 --> 0:10:17.920
<v Speaker 1>Some people say yes, some people say no, not really,

0:10:17.960 --> 0:10:19.400
<v Speaker 1>some people say poor Pluto.

0:10:21.280 --> 0:10:23.920
<v Speaker 2>There does generally seem to be an appreciation of the

0:10:23.960 --> 0:10:26.920
<v Speaker 2>fact that the Solar System might not have always been

0:10:27.040 --> 0:10:31.520
<v Speaker 2>an orderly, stately placed that there might have been primordial chaos.

0:10:31.720 --> 0:10:33.200
<v Speaker 1>That's right. It was a big party here in the

0:10:33.280 --> 0:10:35.480
<v Speaker 1>Solar System, where we're kind of in the after party

0:10:35.520 --> 0:10:36.760
<v Speaker 1>of the Solar System, right.

0:10:37.360 --> 0:10:40.280
<v Speaker 2>We're waking up the next morning going, man, what happened?

0:10:40.280 --> 0:10:42.120
<v Speaker 2>And has anybody seen a dog?

0:10:43.360 --> 0:10:46.400
<v Speaker 1>Yeah? Well, why am I waking up next to Venus here?

0:10:46.760 --> 0:10:47.520
<v Speaker 1>How did that happen?

0:10:47.640 --> 0:10:49.720
<v Speaker 2>And why is the hot tub filled with white chocolate?

0:10:50.280 --> 0:10:54.520
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, so let's start with the basics, Daniel, is it

0:10:54.559 --> 0:10:58.320
<v Speaker 1>even possible for Solar system to lose the planet? I

0:10:58.360 --> 0:11:01.520
<v Speaker 1>thought that, you know, once you form, things are kind

0:11:01.520 --> 0:11:05.000
<v Speaker 1>of stuck to you gravitationally in orbits, or that at

0:11:05.080 --> 0:11:07.920
<v Speaker 1>least that it's hard to escape the gravitational field of

0:11:08.040 --> 0:11:11.640
<v Speaker 1>like Sun or all these planets. Wouldn't they either fall

0:11:11.640 --> 0:11:13.280
<v Speaker 1>in or go into a stable orbit.

0:11:13.360 --> 0:11:16.000
<v Speaker 2>I think the key idea is the word you used, form, Like,

0:11:16.160 --> 0:11:19.640
<v Speaker 2>when do you consider the Solar System to have formed?

0:11:20.040 --> 0:11:24.080
<v Speaker 2>The Solar system? Formation is a slow and gradual, constant process.

0:11:24.120 --> 0:11:27.440
<v Speaker 2>It's basically always changing. And so you can go all

0:11:27.480 --> 0:11:29.680
<v Speaker 2>the way back to the very beginning of the Solar

0:11:29.679 --> 0:11:33.840
<v Speaker 2>system to understand the chaos of that formation and understand

0:11:33.840 --> 0:11:36.880
<v Speaker 2>that that formation is a constant process, that things are

0:11:37.040 --> 0:11:39.880
<v Speaker 2>always potentially bumping into each other and disturbing each other.

0:11:40.040 --> 0:11:42.320
<v Speaker 1>Wait, are you saying that if we leave the window

0:11:42.440 --> 0:11:44.640
<v Speaker 1>open for the fact that maybe the Solar System is

0:11:44.640 --> 0:11:48.000
<v Speaker 1>still forming, does that mean we technically haven't lost any planets? Like?

0:11:48.080 --> 0:11:50.480
<v Speaker 1>Can I use it in my real life.

0:11:51.320 --> 0:11:54.040
<v Speaker 2>No, it just means that during the formation, planets could

0:11:54.120 --> 0:11:57.280
<v Speaker 2>form and be lost. There is no final form to

0:11:57.320 --> 0:12:00.360
<v Speaker 2>the Solar System. It's a constantly evolving thing. It's not

0:12:00.400 --> 0:12:02.760
<v Speaker 2>like at some point somebody says, Okay, the Solar System

0:12:02.840 --> 0:12:05.240
<v Speaker 2>is finished, let's package it and ship it and move

0:12:05.280 --> 0:12:06.880
<v Speaker 2>on to the next project. I see.

0:12:06.920 --> 0:12:09.960
<v Speaker 1>It's like a Pokemon, is what you're saying. It's always evolving,

0:12:10.240 --> 0:12:11.640
<v Speaker 1>it's looking for its final form.

0:12:12.000 --> 0:12:13.920
<v Speaker 2>I don't know enough about Pokemon to know whether that

0:12:13.960 --> 0:12:15.600
<v Speaker 2>analogy holds, So I'm just gonna.

0:12:15.400 --> 0:12:18.160
<v Speaker 1>Trust you on that. I don't know either. To be honest,

0:12:19.320 --> 0:12:21.000
<v Speaker 1>I just heard final form and it made me think

0:12:21.040 --> 0:12:21.600
<v Speaker 1>of Pokemon.

0:12:21.720 --> 0:12:23.560
<v Speaker 2>Well, it's sort of in the same way that animals

0:12:23.559 --> 0:12:26.480
<v Speaker 2>never have a final form. Evolution is a constant process.

0:12:26.720 --> 0:12:29.760
<v Speaker 2>Things are always changing in response to the environment.

0:12:30.400 --> 0:12:33.240
<v Speaker 1>Except for crocodiles and sharks, they're pretty settled there.

0:12:33.080 --> 0:12:34.800
<v Speaker 2>In the plateau. Yeah that's true.

0:12:35.000 --> 0:12:37.480
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, but let me take us through to some of

0:12:37.480 --> 0:12:39.360
<v Speaker 1>the early history of the Solar System. How do we

0:12:39.400 --> 0:12:40.679
<v Speaker 1>get planets in the first place.

0:12:40.800 --> 0:12:43.920
<v Speaker 2>So planetary formation is a super fascinating topic, and it

0:12:43.960 --> 0:12:46.560
<v Speaker 2>helps us understand like the formation of the Solar System

0:12:46.600 --> 0:12:49.360
<v Speaker 2>as a whole. Remember that the Solar system forms from

0:12:49.360 --> 0:12:52.680
<v Speaker 2>the collapse of a huge cloud of like gas and dust.

0:12:53.000 --> 0:12:55.240
<v Speaker 2>It's mostly hydrogen, which is made in the Big Bang,

0:12:55.559 --> 0:12:57.960
<v Speaker 2>and it's also interspersed with a bunch of other heavier

0:12:58.000 --> 0:13:01.000
<v Speaker 2>stuff that's made from other solarss where the stars have

0:13:01.040 --> 0:13:04.200
<v Speaker 2>already fused heavier elements out of that hydrogen. So you

0:13:04.200 --> 0:13:06.320
<v Speaker 2>have this big cloud of mostly hydrogen with a few

0:13:06.320 --> 0:13:09.400
<v Speaker 2>heavier bits in it, and it collapses into stars. You

0:13:09.400 --> 0:13:11.720
<v Speaker 2>don't just get one solar system. You typically get several

0:13:11.720 --> 0:13:14.280
<v Speaker 2>made at the same time. In one of these stellar nurseries,

0:13:14.600 --> 0:13:16.040
<v Speaker 2>we have a big blob of this stuff and it

0:13:16.080 --> 0:13:18.520
<v Speaker 2>collapses and most of the stuff goes into the center

0:13:18.840 --> 0:13:20.920
<v Speaker 2>to make a star, like ninety nine percent of the

0:13:20.960 --> 0:13:23.800
<v Speaker 2>stuff goes in to make the star. But you typically

0:13:23.840 --> 0:13:27.000
<v Speaker 2>have a disc of gas and dust that's orbiting that star.

0:13:27.440 --> 0:13:29.640
<v Speaker 2>It's spinning too fast to collapse in the way the

0:13:29.679 --> 0:13:32.880
<v Speaker 2>Moon is orbiting the Earth without falling into the Earth,

0:13:33.320 --> 0:13:37.520
<v Speaker 2>and so you get this protoplanetary disc around this new star,

0:13:38.240 --> 0:13:42.120
<v Speaker 2>and that disc then coalesces into larger stuff. Gravity is

0:13:42.200 --> 0:13:44.440
<v Speaker 2>doing the work there to pull the gas and dust

0:13:44.559 --> 0:13:47.360
<v Speaker 2>in the disk into heavier things. And where you have

0:13:47.520 --> 0:13:50.960
<v Speaker 2>like little spots of iron or little spots of heavier metals,

0:13:51.000 --> 0:13:54.120
<v Speaker 2>those things will use their gravity to form larger objects.

0:13:54.840 --> 0:13:57.840
<v Speaker 1>But I think the Solar System formed into a disc first,

0:13:57.920 --> 0:13:59.520
<v Speaker 1>and then the star kind of ignited.

0:13:59.600 --> 0:14:02.040
<v Speaker 2>Right. Moment of ignition depends a little bit on the

0:14:02.040 --> 0:14:03.760
<v Speaker 2>mass of the star. I mean, in some cases you

0:14:03.760 --> 0:14:06.280
<v Speaker 2>don't even get ignition if there isn't enough mass there.

0:14:06.320 --> 0:14:09.120
<v Speaker 2>You have like a subcritical brown dwarf, but it's definitely

0:14:09.160 --> 0:14:11.680
<v Speaker 2>collapsing into a disc as it forms. Right, a big

0:14:11.679 --> 0:14:13.920
<v Speaker 2>amorphous blob is going to collapse, and it's going to

0:14:13.960 --> 0:14:16.560
<v Speaker 2>collapse into a disc shape because of its angular rotation.

0:14:17.120 --> 0:14:19.400
<v Speaker 2>So the two things can sort of happen simultaneously, And

0:14:19.440 --> 0:14:22.160
<v Speaker 2>when ignition happens depends on the mass of the star.

0:14:22.440 --> 0:14:24.880
<v Speaker 1>Right, And there's also kind of an intermediate step there

0:14:24.880 --> 0:14:28.680
<v Speaker 1>where the disc kind of turns into rings for a while.

0:14:28.720 --> 0:14:30.840
<v Speaker 1>Right before you get the planets.

0:14:30.520 --> 0:14:33.000
<v Speaker 2>Exactly, you get the seeding of structure and they pull

0:14:33.120 --> 0:14:36.960
<v Speaker 2>together into larger and larger objects, and rings are basically

0:14:37.000 --> 0:14:40.800
<v Speaker 2>just clusters of larger objects. So you get these gaps emerging,

0:14:41.200 --> 0:14:44.040
<v Speaker 2>and then you get those things formed together into planets

0:14:44.160 --> 0:14:47.720
<v Speaker 2>or not, depending on the tidal forces. A large object

0:14:47.760 --> 0:14:49.440
<v Speaker 2>can form and sort of gather up a lot of

0:14:49.440 --> 0:14:51.280
<v Speaker 2>the gas and dust near it, and then it can

0:14:51.320 --> 0:14:54.640
<v Speaker 2>also distort the other stuff nearby, preventing it from forming.

0:14:54.760 --> 0:14:57.080
<v Speaker 2>So it's a bit of a chaotic process in the beginning,

0:14:57.520 --> 0:14:59.480
<v Speaker 2>and it also depends a little bit on your distance

0:14:59.520 --> 0:15:02.040
<v Speaker 2>from the st There's a point it's called the snow line,

0:15:02.120 --> 0:15:04.800
<v Speaker 2>after which water tends to be ice, tends to be

0:15:04.840 --> 0:15:07.360
<v Speaker 2>a solid, and before which it tends to be vapor.

0:15:07.480 --> 0:15:09.760
<v Speaker 2>Like if you're close enough to the star, it's warm

0:15:09.840 --> 0:15:11.960
<v Speaker 2>enough that the water is vapor and if you're further

0:15:11.960 --> 0:15:14.960
<v Speaker 2>from that point, the water is frozen. That helps form

0:15:15.040 --> 0:15:18.080
<v Speaker 2>giant planets. So you tend to have these large planets

0:15:18.120 --> 0:15:21.080
<v Speaker 2>with ice and rock seeding structure on the outer part

0:15:21.120 --> 0:15:23.000
<v Speaker 2>of the Solar System past the snow line, and then

0:15:23.120 --> 0:15:26.040
<v Speaker 2>less ice so smaller planets before the snow line in

0:15:26.080 --> 0:15:27.080
<v Speaker 2>the inner Solar system.

0:15:27.200 --> 0:15:28.840
<v Speaker 1>Right in the inner Solar system, you get all the

0:15:28.960 --> 0:15:30.040
<v Speaker 1>rocky planets.

0:15:29.720 --> 0:15:32.640
<v Speaker 2>Right exactly because the gas there is blown away by

0:15:32.640 --> 0:15:35.000
<v Speaker 2>the radiation from the ignition of the Sun. In the

0:15:35.080 --> 0:15:37.200
<v Speaker 2>very beginning of the Solar system, the Sun is pumping

0:15:37.200 --> 0:15:40.600
<v Speaker 2>out a huge amount of ultraviolet, very high energy photons,

0:15:40.920 --> 0:15:44.120
<v Speaker 2>which tends to blast the inner planets clean, which is why,

0:15:44.160 --> 0:15:47.440
<v Speaker 2>like our initial atmosphere on Earth was blown off by

0:15:47.480 --> 0:15:50.160
<v Speaker 2>this stellar wind in the very early years of the

0:15:50.160 --> 0:15:52.440
<v Speaker 2>Solar System. So you get the rocky planets in the core,

0:15:52.720 --> 0:15:55.040
<v Speaker 2>and then you get the gas and ice giants out

0:15:55.120 --> 0:15:56.680
<v Speaker 2>past the snow line.

0:15:56.520 --> 0:15:58.480
<v Speaker 1>Right, And I think the process is like, yep, these

0:15:58.600 --> 0:16:01.920
<v Speaker 1>rings kind of like Saturn has rings right now, and

0:16:01.960 --> 0:16:05.680
<v Speaker 1>the rings eventually little by little collapse into planets or

0:16:05.720 --> 0:16:07.320
<v Speaker 1>first planet tesimals first, right.

0:16:07.320 --> 0:16:09.920
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, planet testimals a super fun word. They sound like

0:16:10.080 --> 0:16:13.160
<v Speaker 2>many cute little planets where they're basically like building blocks

0:16:13.200 --> 0:16:15.760
<v Speaker 2>of planets, and they don't always form, right, which is

0:16:15.760 --> 0:16:18.320
<v Speaker 2>why you have like the asteroid belt and the Kuiper Belt.

0:16:18.640 --> 0:16:21.560
<v Speaker 2>It depends on the tidal forces of the nearby stuff,

0:16:21.840 --> 0:16:25.200
<v Speaker 2>so it's not happening in isolation. This is complicated interplay

0:16:25.240 --> 0:16:27.040
<v Speaker 2>between all of the objects.

0:16:26.680 --> 0:16:28.760
<v Speaker 1>Right, But it's kind of a bit of a runaway process.

0:16:28.800 --> 0:16:31.920
<v Speaker 1>Like once you seed a planet or once more you know,

0:16:31.960 --> 0:16:34.880
<v Speaker 1>some planet tesimals moush together, then that becomes kind of

0:16:34.920 --> 0:16:37.120
<v Speaker 1>a center of gravity and more and more stuff falls

0:16:37.120 --> 0:16:39.359
<v Speaker 1>into it, and that's kind of how you get a planet.

0:16:39.160 --> 0:16:41.440
<v Speaker 2>Right, Yeah, that's kind of how you get a planet exactly.

0:16:41.840 --> 0:16:45.360
<v Speaker 2>And in this initial picture, everything forms very orderly, like

0:16:45.440 --> 0:16:47.440
<v Speaker 2>they tend to be mostly in the same plane, and

0:16:47.480 --> 0:16:50.440
<v Speaker 2>it be mostly circular because you have this big disc

0:16:50.560 --> 0:16:52.520
<v Speaker 2>as we say, that collapses in the rings and then

0:16:52.560 --> 0:16:55.600
<v Speaker 2>planet ismals and then planets. But once you have these

0:16:55.760 --> 0:16:59.400
<v Speaker 2>large objects formed with their own significant gravity, then they

0:16:59.400 --> 0:17:01.400
<v Speaker 2>can start to hug on each other pretty hard, and

0:17:01.440 --> 0:17:04.360
<v Speaker 2>you can get instabilities, you can get chaos, you can

0:17:04.400 --> 0:17:07.960
<v Speaker 2>get resonances, and that's how planets can migrate, and they

0:17:07.960 --> 0:17:10.440
<v Speaker 2>can tug on each other and you might even lose.

0:17:10.240 --> 0:17:13.080
<v Speaker 1>One, right, because I guess there's no guarantee that your

0:17:13.160 --> 0:17:14.840
<v Speaker 1>orbit is going to be stable. I mean, it's such

0:17:14.840 --> 0:17:18.680
<v Speaker 1>a complex and you know, there's so many things moving

0:17:18.720 --> 0:17:21.080
<v Speaker 1>around that there's no guarantee that even if you're orbiting

0:17:21.119 --> 0:17:23.160
<v Speaker 1>around the Sun, you're going to be there forever, because

0:17:23.160 --> 0:17:26.040
<v Speaker 1>something else might come around and knock you off your

0:17:26.119 --> 0:17:28.280
<v Speaker 1>orbit or pull you away from your orbit, right.

0:17:28.119 --> 0:17:30.439
<v Speaker 2>And that can be things from outside the Solar System,

0:17:30.560 --> 0:17:34.359
<v Speaker 2>like a passing star can nudge something and perturb the

0:17:34.440 --> 0:17:37.840
<v Speaker 2>otherwise stable orbits of the Solar System like even just

0:17:37.880 --> 0:17:40.600
<v Speaker 2>a little nudge from a star that's coming nearby, it's

0:17:40.640 --> 0:17:42.320
<v Speaker 2>not like it has to pass right through the Solar

0:17:42.359 --> 0:17:45.720
<v Speaker 2>system can cause a cascade effect of instabilities. But also,

0:17:46.000 --> 0:17:48.159
<v Speaker 2>just like the planetismals and the Kuyper Belt or the

0:17:48.160 --> 0:17:50.879
<v Speaker 2>asteroid belt can tug on stuff, and enough of that

0:17:51.000 --> 0:17:52.840
<v Speaker 2>happening can cause things to go.

0:17:52.880 --> 0:17:56.240
<v Speaker 1>Wonky and wonky. They might have gone in our Solar system,

0:17:56.400 --> 0:17:58.919
<v Speaker 1>perhaps wonky enough to lose a couple of planets here

0:17:58.920 --> 0:18:02.240
<v Speaker 1>and there. Let's get into that idea and whether or

0:18:02.280 --> 0:18:05.639
<v Speaker 1>not we did misplace a couple of planets in our history.

0:18:05.720 --> 0:18:20.240
<v Speaker 1>But first let's take a quick break. All right, we're

0:18:20.240 --> 0:18:23.640
<v Speaker 1>talking about whether our Solar system has lost any planets.

0:18:23.720 --> 0:18:27.480
<v Speaker 1>I feel like that sounds very irresponsible of the Solar system.

0:18:27.800 --> 0:18:30.199
<v Speaker 1>Can would you say, like, have any planets escaped our

0:18:30.240 --> 0:18:30.840
<v Speaker 1>Solar system?

0:18:30.960 --> 0:18:33.920
<v Speaker 2>Maybe we've grown up and graduated planets. They're like off

0:18:34.000 --> 0:18:36.160
<v Speaker 2>into the universe living their best lives.

0:18:36.280 --> 0:18:38.239
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, there you go. You don't want it to live

0:18:38.240 --> 0:18:38.879
<v Speaker 1>at home forever.

0:18:39.560 --> 0:18:42.280
<v Speaker 2>Exactly when your kid graduates and goes to college, you

0:18:42.320 --> 0:18:43.680
<v Speaker 2>don't consider that you've lost them.

0:18:43.800 --> 0:18:47.480
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, there you go. So have we shepherded planets out

0:18:47.520 --> 0:18:50.400
<v Speaker 1>into the larger cosmos is the question of the day.

0:18:50.520 --> 0:18:52.480
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, in this scenario, they would like come back and

0:18:52.560 --> 0:18:54.399
<v Speaker 2>visit with their own little moons or something that we

0:18:54.440 --> 0:18:55.960
<v Speaker 2>could coop over. Oh look, how cute.

0:18:56.080 --> 0:18:58.560
<v Speaker 1>Oh yeah, yeah, except we already turned their bedroom into

0:18:58.600 --> 0:19:01.159
<v Speaker 1>like a workout room or a craft and so now

0:19:01.200 --> 0:19:02.920
<v Speaker 1>there's no room for them.

0:19:02.960 --> 0:19:04.800
<v Speaker 2>Sorry about that, your orbits being used?

0:19:05.640 --> 0:19:09.480
<v Speaker 1>Yes, sorry, you'll have to airbnb a nearby apartment or something.

0:19:09.840 --> 0:19:13.240
<v Speaker 1>But yeah, So it's possible in the early chaos of

0:19:13.280 --> 0:19:16.800
<v Speaker 1>a solar system to lose a planet, right because things

0:19:16.800 --> 0:19:20.679
<v Speaker 1>aren't quite settled. Even though we're all bound gravitationally to

0:19:20.880 --> 0:19:23.679
<v Speaker 1>the central star, things can get kind of wonky and

0:19:23.680 --> 0:19:27.680
<v Speaker 1>maybe wank enough to actually fling a planet out into space.

0:19:27.840 --> 0:19:30.760
<v Speaker 2>Exactly and when this happens is sort of the most

0:19:30.760 --> 0:19:34.440
<v Speaker 2>recent question people have been struggling with. There's a classic

0:19:34.560 --> 0:19:36.920
<v Speaker 2>model of the formation of the Solar system and how

0:19:36.920 --> 0:19:38.920
<v Speaker 2>the planets move around that we'll talk about. It's called

0:19:38.960 --> 0:19:43.240
<v Speaker 2>the Nice model because it was developed by researchers in Nice, France,

0:19:43.400 --> 0:19:45.840
<v Speaker 2>that has a bit of an issue with when exactly

0:19:45.880 --> 0:19:48.439
<v Speaker 2>all this chaos happened that might be solved by a

0:19:48.440 --> 0:19:51.399
<v Speaker 2>more recent model with a different picture for how these

0:19:51.400 --> 0:19:53.160
<v Speaker 2>instabilities might have been triggered.

0:19:53.240 --> 0:19:55.680
<v Speaker 1>Well, now, I wonder if some listeners out there might

0:19:55.680 --> 0:19:57.919
<v Speaker 1>be confused about how you can lose a planet, Like,

0:19:58.000 --> 0:20:00.800
<v Speaker 1>there isn't that much around us, right in terms of

0:20:00.880 --> 0:20:04.280
<v Speaker 1>other Solar systems or any large stars or galaxy or

0:20:04.359 --> 0:20:07.120
<v Speaker 1>you know, very heavy objects. So even if something gets

0:20:07.160 --> 0:20:09.440
<v Speaker 1>flung into space, wouldn't it eventually come back?

0:20:09.520 --> 0:20:12.680
<v Speaker 2>You're right that space near the Solar System is pretty empty.

0:20:12.920 --> 0:20:15.399
<v Speaker 2>I mean, the closest star is light years away, and

0:20:15.440 --> 0:20:17.800
<v Speaker 2>so its gravitational pull is pretty weak. But you can

0:20:17.840 --> 0:20:20.480
<v Speaker 2>still have an escape velocity. If you throw something hard

0:20:20.560 --> 0:20:23.119
<v Speaker 2>enough off the Earth, it will leave the Earth and

0:20:23.359 --> 0:20:26.040
<v Speaker 2>never return. If you throw something out of the Solar

0:20:26.080 --> 0:20:30.080
<v Speaker 2>System with enough velocity enough to escape the gravitational well

0:20:30.359 --> 0:20:33.159
<v Speaker 2>of the Solar System, then it will not return.

0:20:33.520 --> 0:20:35.680
<v Speaker 1>Mmmmm yeah, I think we talked about that in an

0:20:36.000 --> 0:20:38.240
<v Speaker 1>other episode. It's kind of a weird kind of math, right,

0:20:38.280 --> 0:20:40.400
<v Speaker 1>Like you need to have enough velocity so that as

0:20:40.440 --> 0:20:43.520
<v Speaker 1>you get further and further, the pool of gravity pulling

0:20:43.560 --> 0:20:45.679
<v Speaker 1>your back gets weaker and weaker, and so actually you

0:20:46.280 --> 0:20:49.080
<v Speaker 1>kind of outrun the pool of gravity exactly.

0:20:49.119 --> 0:20:51.720
<v Speaker 2>It seemed confusing because you know that gravity has an

0:20:51.760 --> 0:20:54.320
<v Speaker 2>infinite extent, like no matter how far away you are,

0:20:54.400 --> 0:20:56.960
<v Speaker 2>and the Sun is always pulling on you. But just

0:20:56.960 --> 0:20:59.480
<v Speaker 2>because there are infinite number of contributions doesn't mean it

0:20:59.560 --> 0:21:01.720
<v Speaker 2>adds up to an infinite force. It's just like any

0:21:01.760 --> 0:21:04.760
<v Speaker 2>integral or converging series. It can add to a finite

0:21:04.800 --> 0:21:06.760
<v Speaker 2>amount of energy. So as long as you have more

0:21:06.880 --> 0:21:09.760
<v Speaker 2>energy than the sum of all the tugs the Sun

0:21:09.800 --> 0:21:12.840
<v Speaker 2>will ever pull on you, you can escape the Solar System.

0:21:12.920 --> 0:21:15.080
<v Speaker 2>So if, for example, you have a planet that gets

0:21:15.080 --> 0:21:18.200
<v Speaker 2>a push from another planet and gets flung out into

0:21:18.240 --> 0:21:20.399
<v Speaker 2>the deep dark space, it might never return.

0:21:20.640 --> 0:21:22.800
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, I guess sort of like we've done with spacecraft

0:21:22.800 --> 0:21:25.080
<v Speaker 1>that we sent out into space right like it left

0:21:25.119 --> 0:21:27.240
<v Speaker 1>Earth eventually, it was going so fast it left the

0:21:27.280 --> 0:21:30.440
<v Speaker 1>gravity of Earth and through the gravity of maybe other planets.

0:21:30.480 --> 0:21:32.359
<v Speaker 1>And now we have some that are going out of

0:21:32.400 --> 0:21:33.680
<v Speaker 1>the Solar System exactly.

0:21:33.720 --> 0:21:35.520
<v Speaker 2>That can be a little bit more complicated because they

0:21:35.560 --> 0:21:38.680
<v Speaker 2>can have rockets and they can use gravitational assists from

0:21:38.720 --> 0:21:41.640
<v Speaker 2>other planets, but the principle is the same. Like Voyager

0:21:41.800 --> 0:21:44.919
<v Speaker 2>and Pioneer, they have enough velocity that they're leaving the

0:21:44.960 --> 0:21:48.120
<v Speaker 2>Solar System without any more rocket burns or gravitational assists.

0:21:48.320 --> 0:21:49.920
<v Speaker 2>It's definitely possible to leave home.

0:21:50.040 --> 0:21:53.520
<v Speaker 1>All right. Well, now the question here today is have

0:21:53.560 --> 0:21:56.399
<v Speaker 1>we actually lost any planets? Did the Solar System have

0:21:56.520 --> 0:21:58.520
<v Speaker 1>more planets than the eight that we have now, and

0:21:58.840 --> 0:22:01.520
<v Speaker 1>have we missed or have any left home?

0:22:01.600 --> 0:22:03.240
<v Speaker 2>But if you look at the pattern of the planets

0:22:03.240 --> 0:22:04.840
<v Speaker 2>that we have now and you try to tell a

0:22:04.880 --> 0:22:07.480
<v Speaker 2>story about how we got there, it's a hard thing

0:22:07.520 --> 0:22:10.560
<v Speaker 2>to do without another planet. The patterns that we see

0:22:10.600 --> 0:22:13.480
<v Speaker 2>in the eccentricities of the planets and the structure of

0:22:13.520 --> 0:22:16.879
<v Speaker 2>the Kuiper Belt and the asteroids is much easier to

0:22:16.960 --> 0:22:20.479
<v Speaker 2>explain if there was at one point another ice giant

0:22:20.800 --> 0:22:24.240
<v Speaker 2>like Neptune that was flung out of the Solar System.

0:22:24.320 --> 0:22:25.959
<v Speaker 1>I mean, you sort of look at how the planets

0:22:25.960 --> 0:22:29.200
<v Speaker 1>are moving now and their orbits, and you basically hit

0:22:29.200 --> 0:22:31.600
<v Speaker 1>the rewind button, kind of like you use math and

0:22:31.680 --> 0:22:36.240
<v Speaker 1>a computer to backtrack what the Solar System was doing

0:22:36.320 --> 0:22:38.720
<v Speaker 1>millions and millions of years ago, and you're saying that

0:22:38.760 --> 0:22:39.920
<v Speaker 1>it doesn't make sense or what.

0:22:40.000 --> 0:22:42.399
<v Speaker 2>It actually usually works. In the forward direction, like you

0:22:42.520 --> 0:22:46.159
<v Speaker 2>start from the Protosolar System and try to evolve forward

0:22:46.280 --> 0:22:48.960
<v Speaker 2>and see if it matches what we see today. Conceptually

0:22:48.960 --> 0:22:51.520
<v Speaker 2>it's the same as backtracking, but the way the simulations

0:22:51.560 --> 0:22:54.920
<v Speaker 2>actually work is forwards. You know, we model physics equations

0:22:54.920 --> 0:22:57.159
<v Speaker 2>forwards in time, and we try to see if we

0:22:57.240 --> 0:22:59.800
<v Speaker 2>can get to the current Solar system and explain everything

0:22:59.840 --> 0:23:02.120
<v Speaker 2>we see. And what we find is that doesn't really

0:23:02.160 --> 0:23:03.359
<v Speaker 2>work without another planet.

0:23:03.440 --> 0:23:05.280
<v Speaker 1>But are there like a million things that could have

0:23:05.280 --> 0:23:08.639
<v Speaker 1>happened in between? Absolutely, how do you make it match

0:23:09.040 --> 0:23:11.800
<v Speaker 1>what we have now? Like, what do you start with?

0:23:12.640 --> 0:23:14.439
<v Speaker 1>And if you can make it match, how do you

0:23:14.440 --> 0:23:15.960
<v Speaker 1>know it's not just you're making it error?

0:23:16.119 --> 0:23:20.600
<v Speaker 2>Absolutely, it's not definitive, right, it's statistical. It's totally possible

0:23:20.760 --> 0:23:23.920
<v Speaker 2>that our solar system could have arisen without another planet.

0:23:24.240 --> 0:23:26.600
<v Speaker 2>But it's just a question of what's more likely. Like

0:23:26.640 --> 0:23:29.400
<v Speaker 2>when you run the simulations of our solar system, how

0:23:29.400 --> 0:23:31.600
<v Speaker 2>many times do you get to something like what we

0:23:31.680 --> 0:23:35.120
<v Speaker 2>have now with a lost planet and without a lost planet?

0:23:35.600 --> 0:23:38.480
<v Speaker 2>And so is it just easier to make this arrangement

0:23:38.560 --> 0:23:41.359
<v Speaker 2>with a lost planet or without? It's totally possible to

0:23:41.359 --> 0:23:43.520
<v Speaker 2>do it without, but it's just less likely. It happens

0:23:43.560 --> 0:23:45.120
<v Speaker 2>in fewer of those simulations.

0:23:45.880 --> 0:23:47.600
<v Speaker 1>And by like what we have now, you don't mean

0:23:47.680 --> 0:23:49.720
<v Speaker 1>like exactly what we have now just kind of like

0:23:49.800 --> 0:23:51.000
<v Speaker 1>sort of like what we have now.

0:23:51.119 --> 0:23:53.600
<v Speaker 2>If you run enough simulations, you can get essentially a

0:23:53.680 --> 0:23:56.360
<v Speaker 2>sense for what's more likely and what's less likely under

0:23:56.400 --> 0:23:59.960
<v Speaker 2>various hypotheses. And if you have another planet in your system,

0:24:00.240 --> 0:24:03.320
<v Speaker 2>then you get more simulations that are similar to ours. Yeah,

0:24:03.560 --> 0:24:06.399
<v Speaker 2>so more like probability gets clustered in the kind of

0:24:06.520 --> 0:24:08.560
<v Speaker 2>arrangement that we have now. And the cool thing about

0:24:08.560 --> 0:24:10.320
<v Speaker 2>that is that it tells the story. You can look

0:24:10.359 --> 0:24:12.639
<v Speaker 2>at those simulations and you can see, oh, what happened

0:24:12.640 --> 0:24:14.600
<v Speaker 2>in the inner what happened in the early days of

0:24:14.640 --> 0:24:16.679
<v Speaker 2>the Solar System? How did this happen?

0:24:17.320 --> 0:24:19.919
<v Speaker 1>Okay, So then scientists have been running these simulations and

0:24:19.960 --> 0:24:22.280
<v Speaker 1>it's kind of hard to get what we have now

0:24:22.560 --> 0:24:26.840
<v Speaker 1>without some mystery planet that moved away from the Solar System.

0:24:26.960 --> 0:24:28.240
<v Speaker 1>How did scientists think that happen?

0:24:28.320 --> 0:24:31.840
<v Speaker 2>So the original models, called the NIE model, basically blames

0:24:31.840 --> 0:24:34.919
<v Speaker 2>it on the Kuiper Belt. So in the original Solar system,

0:24:34.960 --> 0:24:39.080
<v Speaker 2>you have Jupiter, Saturn, Urinus, Neptune, all formed in very nice,

0:24:39.200 --> 0:24:41.920
<v Speaker 2>neat circular orbits like we talked about, in fairly closely

0:24:41.960 --> 0:24:44.560
<v Speaker 2>spaced to each other. But then you have these planetismals

0:24:44.600 --> 0:24:47.000
<v Speaker 2>out in the Kuiper Belt that haven't formed into planets,

0:24:47.160 --> 0:24:50.160
<v Speaker 2>but they're tugging on Neptune, they're tugging on Urinus, they're

0:24:50.200 --> 0:24:52.520
<v Speaker 2>tugging on Saturn, and they get pulled into the inner

0:24:52.560 --> 0:24:55.080
<v Speaker 2>Solar System. And when that happens, these big planets get

0:24:55.119 --> 0:24:57.320
<v Speaker 2>pushed out a little bit, and then the planetismal falls

0:24:57.359 --> 0:25:00.159
<v Speaker 2>further into the Solar System until it reaches Jupiter, and

0:25:00.160 --> 0:25:03.240
<v Speaker 2>then Jupiter actually pushes it back out and Jupiter gets

0:25:03.240 --> 0:25:06.160
<v Speaker 2>pushed in. The effect of these little planetismals, these little

0:25:06.160 --> 0:25:09.840
<v Speaker 2>tugs is to pull out Neptune, Saturn, Uriness and to

0:25:09.880 --> 0:25:12.800
<v Speaker 2>push Jupiter in a little bit. So they're disturbing the

0:25:12.840 --> 0:25:14.640
<v Speaker 2>Solar System. And you might think, well, what can one

0:25:14.680 --> 0:25:17.240
<v Speaker 2>little rock do? And the key is that there's lots

0:25:17.280 --> 0:25:20.120
<v Speaker 2>of these rocks, and so over time this can really

0:25:20.160 --> 0:25:21.640
<v Speaker 2>have an effect on the orbit of the.

0:25:21.600 --> 0:25:25.280
<v Speaker 1>Planets because we know that at around that space, that

0:25:25.480 --> 0:25:27.440
<v Speaker 1>ring of the Solar System, you had a lot of

0:25:27.440 --> 0:25:28.840
<v Speaker 1>big rocks, and maybe you have a lot of big

0:25:28.920 --> 0:25:30.040
<v Speaker 1>rocks right now exactly.

0:25:30.080 --> 0:25:32.920
<v Speaker 2>The Kuiper Belt is huge. There could be like trillions

0:25:32.960 --> 0:25:35.720
<v Speaker 2>of objects out there. We think today it's the source

0:25:35.760 --> 0:25:38.480
<v Speaker 2>of comets that fall into the Solar System, the short

0:25:38.520 --> 0:25:41.400
<v Speaker 2>period comets. There's an even bigger blob of stuff out

0:25:41.440 --> 0:25:43.199
<v Speaker 2>in the Oort Cloud. It might be the source of

0:25:43.280 --> 0:25:46.520
<v Speaker 2>long term comments, but it's an enormous, massive stuff out there,

0:25:46.680 --> 0:25:48.720
<v Speaker 2>and each of those little bits as they interact with

0:25:48.760 --> 0:25:51.119
<v Speaker 2>the Solar System can give a little tug. You have

0:25:51.240 --> 0:25:54.359
<v Speaker 2>these nice circular orbits that were formed initially, but now

0:25:54.400 --> 0:25:57.040
<v Speaker 2>they're getting perturbed by these tugs from all these rocks

0:25:57.080 --> 0:25:58.600
<v Speaker 2>in the Kuiper Belt. Mmm.

0:25:59.000 --> 0:26:01.760
<v Speaker 1>Okay, scientist think that maybe these rocks from the Kuyper

0:26:01.800 --> 0:26:05.040
<v Speaker 1>berl maybe cause some planet that we had before to

0:26:05.200 --> 0:26:06.359
<v Speaker 1>exit the Solar System.

0:26:06.400 --> 0:26:09.800
<v Speaker 2>Well, essentially leads to some instability because you're pushing Jupiter in,

0:26:10.040 --> 0:26:13.879
<v Speaker 2>you're pushing Neptune, Saturn, Urinus out, and then those planets

0:26:13.920 --> 0:26:15.920
<v Speaker 2>start to interact like they used to be in a nice,

0:26:15.920 --> 0:26:19.360
<v Speaker 2>happy orbit. But now you get instabilities and resonances from

0:26:19.400 --> 0:26:23.000
<v Speaker 2>those planets themselves. Jupiter starts to drift inwards, and then

0:26:23.080 --> 0:26:26.040
<v Speaker 2>Saturn pulls on Jupiter, and Jupiter pulls on Saturn. You

0:26:26.080 --> 0:26:28.440
<v Speaker 2>start to get a regular orbits, and Saturn actually pulling

0:26:28.440 --> 0:26:31.199
<v Speaker 2>on Jupiter is what saves it. Saturn pulls on Jupiter

0:26:31.240 --> 0:26:34.480
<v Speaker 2>and changes its direction so it migrates back out away

0:26:34.520 --> 0:26:37.040
<v Speaker 2>from the Sun. Without Saturn there, it might have been

0:26:37.080 --> 0:26:39.440
<v Speaker 2>that Jupiter would have just like plummeted into the Sun

0:26:39.600 --> 0:26:41.200
<v Speaker 2>thanks to the influence of the Kuiper Belt.

0:26:41.280 --> 0:26:43.520
<v Speaker 1>You know, it all sounds kind of complicated, So I

0:26:43.520 --> 0:26:46.360
<v Speaker 1>wonder why do scientist think that making it more complicated

0:26:46.359 --> 0:26:49.720
<v Speaker 1>by adding another planet makes it easier to understand? Like

0:26:49.760 --> 0:26:52.600
<v Speaker 1>it's all really complex dynamics, right, Like, so then how

0:26:52.640 --> 0:26:56.520
<v Speaker 1>does adding another planet make it easier to predict, like

0:26:56.560 --> 0:27:00.320
<v Speaker 1>what's the missing thing that we currently have? That missing

0:27:00.359 --> 0:27:01.439
<v Speaker 1>planet would help with.

0:27:01.640 --> 0:27:03.760
<v Speaker 2>Some of the features of our Solar system that we

0:27:03.840 --> 0:27:07.240
<v Speaker 2>see today are difficult to explain without adding another planet,

0:27:07.800 --> 0:27:10.680
<v Speaker 2>you know, like the irregular orbits of Jupiter and Saturn.

0:27:10.720 --> 0:27:13.119
<v Speaker 2>They're not perfect circles. There are sort of ellipses that

0:27:13.200 --> 0:27:16.400
<v Speaker 2>have like a five percent eccentricity, And there's this structure

0:27:16.520 --> 0:27:18.840
<v Speaker 2>in the material of the Kuiper Belt. A lot of

0:27:18.840 --> 0:27:20.520
<v Speaker 2>it seems to have been lost, and a lot of

0:27:20.560 --> 0:27:23.159
<v Speaker 2>the rest of it is in resonance with Neptune. And

0:27:23.200 --> 0:27:25.960
<v Speaker 2>these things aren't like smoking guns that say like, oh, look,

0:27:26.040 --> 0:27:28.199
<v Speaker 2>there has to be another planet here. But when you

0:27:28.280 --> 0:27:30.720
<v Speaker 2>run the simulations, you get these kind of features more

0:27:30.760 --> 0:27:33.800
<v Speaker 2>often when you add another planet. If you put another

0:27:33.840 --> 0:27:37.400
<v Speaker 2>ice giant in around the size of Neptune between Saturn

0:27:37.440 --> 0:27:40.160
<v Speaker 2>and Urinus, then the story you get when you run

0:27:40.200 --> 0:27:44.000
<v Speaker 2>these simulations more closely resembles the Solar System we have today.

0:27:44.119 --> 0:27:47.040
<v Speaker 1>And I guess scientists just throw this mystery planet in

0:27:47.160 --> 0:27:49.960
<v Speaker 1>and all kinds of velocities in all kinds of sizes,

0:27:50.000 --> 0:27:52.400
<v Speaker 1>and you sort of see overall, like, hey, it does

0:27:52.480 --> 0:27:55.720
<v Speaker 1>kind of shape the Solar System more into what we

0:27:55.760 --> 0:27:56.160
<v Speaker 1>have now.

0:27:56.280 --> 0:27:58.119
<v Speaker 2>Yeah. Another way to say it is like they were

0:27:58.200 --> 0:28:01.000
<v Speaker 2>running the simulations with just the planets and they were

0:28:01.040 --> 0:28:05.080
<v Speaker 2>noticing that they pretty rarely ended up describing the situation

0:28:05.160 --> 0:28:07.359
<v Speaker 2>that we see today, Like it was very unlikely to

0:28:07.400 --> 0:28:10.240
<v Speaker 2>get Jupiter and Saturn to have these eccentricities, and to

0:28:10.280 --> 0:28:14.080
<v Speaker 2>have these asteroid belts along Jupiter's orbit, the Trojans and

0:28:14.119 --> 0:28:16.760
<v Speaker 2>the Greek camp of asteroid belts, those things were pretty

0:28:16.880 --> 0:28:19.760
<v Speaker 2>rare to get in a Solar system without this additional planet.

0:28:19.760 --> 0:28:21.760
<v Speaker 2>But when you put that new planet in, it started

0:28:21.760 --> 0:28:23.399
<v Speaker 2>to be less unlikely. It started to be like, oh,

0:28:23.440 --> 0:28:25.880
<v Speaker 2>this kind of thing happens pretty frequently, and so it's

0:28:25.920 --> 0:28:27.560
<v Speaker 2>just a question of like, how do you explain it.

0:28:27.560 --> 0:28:30.040
<v Speaker 2>It's not the only possible story, right, Maybe there are

0:28:30.040 --> 0:28:33.399
<v Speaker 2>two other planets. Maybe something else happened that could explain this,

0:28:33.720 --> 0:28:35.640
<v Speaker 2>but it does make the story more likely.

0:28:36.480 --> 0:28:39.360
<v Speaker 1>Maybe the planet had a big fight with Jupiter, stormed

0:28:39.360 --> 0:28:41.440
<v Speaker 1>out of the house with all their bags, left to

0:28:41.480 --> 0:28:43.520
<v Speaker 1>go live with their aunt or their niece. This is

0:28:43.680 --> 0:28:45.640
<v Speaker 1>the Nice model, right, This.

0:28:45.400 --> 0:28:48.520
<v Speaker 2>Is the Nie model exactly. They went to live with

0:28:48.560 --> 0:28:49.400
<v Speaker 2>their aunt in France.

0:28:49.680 --> 0:28:51.840
<v Speaker 1>So then that's one model you're seeing. One model says

0:28:51.840 --> 0:28:53.880
<v Speaker 1>and maybe it was all these big rocks from the

0:28:53.960 --> 0:28:56.440
<v Speaker 1>Kuiper Belt that maybe caused a lot of instability out

0:28:56.440 --> 0:28:58.920
<v Speaker 1>there in the icy planets, and then maybe it caused

0:28:58.920 --> 0:29:01.280
<v Speaker 1>a planet that we used to have to flyway exactly.

0:29:01.280 --> 0:29:03.400
<v Speaker 2>And one of the nice things about this model until

0:29:03.440 --> 0:29:06.160
<v Speaker 2>recently was that it lined up with other pieces of

0:29:06.200 --> 0:29:09.960
<v Speaker 2>evidence for when this instability happened. And in the Nice model,

0:29:10.000 --> 0:29:12.920
<v Speaker 2>this happens like about a billion years after the Solar

0:29:12.920 --> 0:29:15.840
<v Speaker 2>system is formed, so you get like the ignition of

0:29:15.880 --> 0:29:17.920
<v Speaker 2>the Sun, you get the formation and the gas planets

0:29:17.920 --> 0:29:20.840
<v Speaker 2>and the rocky planets. Things cycle around for a little while,

0:29:21.080 --> 0:29:23.120
<v Speaker 2>and it takes time for the Kuyper Belt to sort

0:29:23.120 --> 0:29:26.000
<v Speaker 2>of drive this because these are tiny little rocks. This

0:29:26.040 --> 0:29:28.240
<v Speaker 2>sort of lines up with another piece of evidence from

0:29:28.280 --> 0:29:30.400
<v Speaker 2>looking at our Moon. Our moon is a great record

0:29:30.480 --> 0:29:33.200
<v Speaker 2>for impacts in the Solar System, like when rocks have

0:29:33.320 --> 0:29:35.920
<v Speaker 2>been raining down in the inner Solar System. And when

0:29:35.920 --> 0:29:38.240
<v Speaker 2>the astronauts in the Apollo mission went to the Moon,

0:29:38.400 --> 0:29:40.600
<v Speaker 2>they gathered a bunch of samples to study, like the

0:29:40.600 --> 0:29:42.800
<v Speaker 2>craters and the impacts, to try to get a sense

0:29:42.840 --> 0:29:44.920
<v Speaker 2>for like what is the history of the Solar system.

0:29:45.080 --> 0:29:48.120
<v Speaker 2>One of them been sort of more or less impacts

0:29:48.280 --> 0:29:50.560
<v Speaker 2>when it's been like bad weather and good weather, and

0:29:50.640 --> 0:29:52.479
<v Speaker 2>for a long time, there was this evidence for what

0:29:52.520 --> 0:29:55.640
<v Speaker 2>we call a late heavy bombardment, that there's this period

0:29:55.680 --> 0:29:58.280
<v Speaker 2>of billion years after the Solar system formed when a

0:29:58.320 --> 0:30:00.760
<v Speaker 2>lot of rocks were raining down in the the Solar system,

0:30:01.080 --> 0:30:02.640
<v Speaker 2>And that kind of lines up with the story of

0:30:02.680 --> 0:30:04.840
<v Speaker 2>the nice model that like all these rocks from the

0:30:04.920 --> 0:30:07.160
<v Speaker 2>Kuiper Belt were coming in and making trouble and maybe

0:30:07.200 --> 0:30:09.880
<v Speaker 2>also some of them were landing on the Moon. So

0:30:09.920 --> 0:30:11.480
<v Speaker 2>that was sort of a nice story.

0:30:11.160 --> 0:30:14.840
<v Speaker 1>For a while, meaning like there's a lot of activity

0:30:14.840 --> 0:30:17.840
<v Speaker 1>from the Kuiper Bell which may have contributed to us

0:30:17.920 --> 0:30:19.960
<v Speaker 1>kicking out an icy planet.

0:30:19.680 --> 0:30:21.920
<v Speaker 2>Exactly, and until a few years ago that all seemed

0:30:21.920 --> 0:30:23.600
<v Speaker 2>to kind of hang together. But then there was a

0:30:23.680 --> 0:30:27.040
<v Speaker 2>reanalysis of this data from the Moon and it turns

0:30:27.040 --> 0:30:28.280
<v Speaker 2>out that it may have been a mistake.

0:30:28.520 --> 0:30:31.400
<v Speaker 1>Well, we lost the theory the dog at theory.

0:30:31.480 --> 0:30:33.840
<v Speaker 2>It turns out of the way the astronauts gathered the

0:30:33.920 --> 0:30:37.640
<v Speaker 2>data that may have basically only collected data from one

0:30:37.720 --> 0:30:40.520
<v Speaker 2>big impact. So what we thought was a bunch of

0:30:40.560 --> 0:30:43.240
<v Speaker 2>impacts that all happened at the same time, like three

0:30:43.280 --> 0:30:45.840
<v Speaker 2>and a half billion years ago, might have actually just

0:30:45.880 --> 0:30:48.920
<v Speaker 2>been one big impact that the astronauts gathered from. So

0:30:48.920 --> 0:30:51.480
<v Speaker 2>it could have been like essentially just a statistical anomaly

0:30:51.520 --> 0:30:52.840
<v Speaker 2>in the data that made it look like there was

0:30:52.920 --> 0:30:55.600
<v Speaker 2>really bad weather for like a few hundred million years

0:30:55.680 --> 0:30:57.360
<v Speaker 2>three and a half billion years ago, But it was

0:30:57.400 --> 0:30:59.880
<v Speaker 2>really just one bad day that the astronauts happened to

0:31:00.000 --> 0:31:00.800
<v Speaker 2>elect data from.

0:31:00.960 --> 0:31:03.959
<v Speaker 1>Wait what, so we didn't we just had one sample.

0:31:04.120 --> 0:31:06.240
<v Speaker 1>We didn't take some samples from all over the Moon

0:31:06.400 --> 0:31:10.040
<v Speaker 1>or analyze the craters visually through telescopes, so.

0:31:10.000 --> 0:31:11.720
<v Speaker 2>We don't have samples from all over the Moon. And

0:31:11.720 --> 0:31:14.680
<v Speaker 2>they definitely collected a bunch of samples from different locations,

0:31:15.000 --> 0:31:17.280
<v Speaker 2>and that's why they thought maybe this was like a

0:31:17.320 --> 0:31:20.800
<v Speaker 2>fair sample from everywhere on the Moon. But a reanalysis

0:31:20.840 --> 0:31:24.360
<v Speaker 2>of it suggests that a single impact site Imbrium might

0:31:24.360 --> 0:31:27.200
<v Speaker 2>be responsible for basically all of the evidence that the

0:31:27.400 --> 0:31:29.520
<v Speaker 2>astronauts gathered. I don't know if the astronauts are being

0:31:29.560 --> 0:31:31.960
<v Speaker 2>lazy and not following instructions or if it was not

0:31:32.040 --> 0:31:35.480
<v Speaker 2>a well organized study, but more recent analysis suggests there

0:31:35.480 --> 0:31:38.400
<v Speaker 2>may have been no late heavy bombardment. There may just

0:31:38.440 --> 0:31:40.920
<v Speaker 2>be like a gradual decline in the number of impacts

0:31:40.920 --> 0:31:41.480
<v Speaker 2>over time.

0:31:42.040 --> 0:31:44.800
<v Speaker 1>And so maybe this idea that kyper Berl maybe caused

0:31:44.880 --> 0:31:47.600
<v Speaker 1>us to lose an icy planet maybe didn't really happen,

0:31:47.920 --> 0:31:50.640
<v Speaker 1>or could it still have happened without this late heavy bombardment.

0:31:50.840 --> 0:31:53.240
<v Speaker 2>This really causes us to doubt that model. And there's

0:31:53.360 --> 0:31:56.680
<v Speaker 2>been another lingering problem with this Nie model that has

0:31:56.720 --> 0:32:00.000
<v Speaker 2>never really been answered, which is why the terrestrial planets

0:32:00.080 --> 0:32:02.800
<v Speaker 2>kind of survived it. If you have these gas giants

0:32:02.880 --> 0:32:05.760
<v Speaker 2>doing this dance a billion years after the Solar System

0:32:05.800 --> 0:32:08.640
<v Speaker 2>is formed, when Earth and Mars are also already formed,

0:32:09.080 --> 0:32:11.760
<v Speaker 2>then how did the Earth and Mars and Venus survive

0:32:12.000 --> 0:32:15.440
<v Speaker 2>all these gravitational tugs. If Jupiter comes into the inner

0:32:15.480 --> 0:32:18.640
<v Speaker 2>Solar System basically turns around at the asteroid belt, how

0:32:18.680 --> 0:32:21.640
<v Speaker 2>does Mars stay in orbit? How does Earth stay where

0:32:21.680 --> 0:32:24.160
<v Speaker 2>it is? So one concerned about the Nie model has

0:32:24.160 --> 0:32:27.640
<v Speaker 2>always been how did the terrestrial planets not get disrupted

0:32:27.680 --> 0:32:30.760
<v Speaker 2>by the giants. So now there's a news story about

0:32:30.800 --> 0:32:33.560
<v Speaker 2>when this instability happened and what the cause was that

0:32:33.640 --> 0:32:36.640
<v Speaker 2>doesn't rely on this late heavy bombardment and places the

0:32:36.640 --> 0:32:38.480
<v Speaker 2>blame on the instability somewhere else.

0:32:39.200 --> 0:32:41.120
<v Speaker 1>But I guess why do we assume that there was

0:32:41.360 --> 0:32:44.480
<v Speaker 1>an instability because we think that maybe we did lose

0:32:44.480 --> 0:32:45.280
<v Speaker 1>a planet.

0:32:44.960 --> 0:32:47.480
<v Speaker 2>Because we can't explain the orbits and the eccentricities and

0:32:47.520 --> 0:32:50.160
<v Speaker 2>the structure of the Kyper Belt without some kind of

0:32:50.240 --> 0:32:52.680
<v Speaker 2>motion of these planets. We know the planets moved around,

0:32:52.960 --> 0:32:55.440
<v Speaker 2>we know there was interaction. We know that they did

0:32:55.480 --> 0:32:57.560
<v Speaker 2>not form in the order that we see them today.

0:32:57.760 --> 0:33:01.440
<v Speaker 1>All right, So then what's this new model? Not so nice,

0:33:02.080 --> 0:33:06.240
<v Speaker 1>the less nice model exactly, not the Nie model, the

0:33:06.280 --> 0:33:07.160
<v Speaker 1>Nephew model.

0:33:07.720 --> 0:33:11.440
<v Speaker 2>The nibbling model. So this model is called the rebound model,

0:33:11.600 --> 0:33:15.200
<v Speaker 2>and it suggests that this instability happened much much earlier. Actually,

0:33:15.240 --> 0:33:18.080
<v Speaker 2>while the rocky planets were forming, or maybe even before

0:33:18.200 --> 0:33:21.600
<v Speaker 2>they formed, that was basically an early instability.

0:33:21.800 --> 0:33:24.640
<v Speaker 1>Well, that's a big difference in timescale, But don't your

0:33:24.640 --> 0:33:27.880
<v Speaker 1>simulations as a solar system sort of help you pinpoint

0:33:27.920 --> 0:33:28.560
<v Speaker 1>when it happened.

0:33:28.600 --> 0:33:30.320
<v Speaker 2>It turns out that the simulations can come in to

0:33:30.360 --> 0:33:34.040
<v Speaker 2>either an early instability or a later instability, like the

0:33:34.080 --> 0:33:36.880
<v Speaker 2>instability for in the nice model, like a billion years

0:33:36.920 --> 0:33:39.680
<v Speaker 2>after the formation of the Solar system, can explain the

0:33:39.800 --> 0:33:42.560
<v Speaker 2>orbits that we got if there, in fact was a

0:33:42.600 --> 0:33:45.320
<v Speaker 2>bunch of interactions from the Kuiper Belt. But you could

0:33:45.400 --> 0:33:48.360
<v Speaker 2>also have an instability much earlier on that could reproduce

0:33:48.400 --> 0:33:50.680
<v Speaker 2>the orbits and the eccentricities that we see today.

0:33:51.600 --> 0:33:53.720
<v Speaker 1>All right, so then what does this model say? What

0:33:53.840 --> 0:33:56.400
<v Speaker 1>happened according to this model? So this is called the

0:33:56.440 --> 0:33:59.680
<v Speaker 1>rebound model, and essentially the instability trigger here, the thing

0:33:59.720 --> 0:34:03.440
<v Speaker 1>that can kicked off all this bouncing around was the

0:34:03.440 --> 0:34:06.960
<v Speaker 1>interaction of the planets with this gas. Imagine the formation

0:34:07.000 --> 0:34:09.040
<v Speaker 1>of the Solar system, as we talked about earlier. You

0:34:09.120 --> 0:34:11.760
<v Speaker 1>have these planets forming and they're pulling their stuff together,

0:34:11.920 --> 0:34:14.759
<v Speaker 1>but you still have something of a protoplanetary disk. You

0:34:14.760 --> 0:34:16.880
<v Speaker 1>still have a bunch of gas sort of in between

0:34:16.920 --> 0:34:18.840
<v Speaker 1>the planets. Now we don't have that today, and the

0:34:18.880 --> 0:34:21.479
<v Speaker 1>reason is that the Sun has effectively blown all that out.

0:34:21.520 --> 0:34:24.240
<v Speaker 1>As the Sun triggered and the ignited and its radiation

0:34:24.400 --> 0:34:26.600
<v Speaker 1>grew and grew, it blew out all that gas from

0:34:26.640 --> 0:34:29.560
<v Speaker 1>the Solar system. So in the first ten million years

0:34:29.680 --> 0:34:32.919
<v Speaker 1>or so, that gas disc is sort of moving out

0:34:33.000 --> 0:34:35.520
<v Speaker 1>through the Solar System and it affects the orbits of

0:34:35.560 --> 0:34:38.040
<v Speaker 1>those planets. If the planets are passing through the gas,

0:34:38.080 --> 0:34:40.800
<v Speaker 1>it slows them down, and if that gas is getting

0:34:40.840 --> 0:34:44.120
<v Speaker 1>pushed out by the star, it actually carries those planets

0:34:44.120 --> 0:34:46.839
<v Speaker 1>with them a little bit. So as this gas disc

0:34:46.920 --> 0:34:49.160
<v Speaker 1>is getting pushed out of the Solar System, it passes

0:34:49.280 --> 0:34:51.839
<v Speaker 1>through all of these orbits and it gives them all

0:34:51.880 --> 0:34:55.000
<v Speaker 1>a little tweak. So this rebound model suggests that the

0:34:55.040 --> 0:34:57.920
<v Speaker 1>interaction of the planets with this gas disc as it's

0:34:57.920 --> 0:35:00.680
<v Speaker 1>getting blown out of the Solar System and trigger these

0:35:00.719 --> 0:35:03.600
<v Speaker 1>same instabilities and can explain all the features we see

0:35:03.640 --> 0:35:06.279
<v Speaker 1>in the Solar system today. But couldn't you kind of

0:35:06.320 --> 0:35:08.920
<v Speaker 1>make the same argument as before with the other model,

0:35:09.000 --> 0:35:11.279
<v Speaker 1>like Wooden Huck How is it then that we'd the

0:35:11.280 --> 0:35:13.759
<v Speaker 1>Earth and Mars and Venus have such a nice even

0:35:13.840 --> 0:35:16.399
<v Speaker 1>orbits if we were disturbed and blown out.

0:35:16.520 --> 0:35:19.759
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, great question. It's because this happened much earlier, and

0:35:19.800 --> 0:35:23.040
<v Speaker 2>so essentially this happened before those terrestrial planets even form.

0:35:23.120 --> 0:35:25.960
<v Speaker 2>The terrestrial planets we think formed after the gas giants.

0:35:26.239 --> 0:35:28.120
<v Speaker 2>M how come the gas giants have a lot of

0:35:28.160 --> 0:35:30.760
<v Speaker 2>advantages over the rocky planets in the inner solar systems.

0:35:31.040 --> 0:35:33.120
<v Speaker 2>Number one, there's ice out there, which is like a

0:35:33.200 --> 0:35:35.920
<v Speaker 2>solid that can help seed the formation of planets. To

0:35:36.040 --> 0:35:38.200
<v Speaker 2>there's a lot more gas out there because the Sun

0:35:38.239 --> 0:35:40.800
<v Speaker 2>hasn't gobbled it up, and you don't have this proto

0:35:41.000 --> 0:35:44.120
<v Speaker 2>star messing everything up and heating things. So it's much colder,

0:35:44.160 --> 0:35:46.680
<v Speaker 2>which makes it easier for gravity to pull things together.

0:35:46.840 --> 0:35:49.160
<v Speaker 2>So the outer Solar system is a much easier place

0:35:49.200 --> 0:35:51.760
<v Speaker 2>to form planets. So we think that gas planets formed

0:35:51.760 --> 0:35:54.759
<v Speaker 2>before the gas disc actually evaporated, sometimes in like the

0:35:54.800 --> 0:35:57.839
<v Speaker 2>two to ten million year range. But rocky planets take

0:35:57.920 --> 0:36:01.120
<v Speaker 2>longer because the inner Solar system is much hotter and messier,

0:36:01.239 --> 0:36:04.120
<v Speaker 2>is less gas available to form planets and no ice whatsoever,

0:36:04.280 --> 0:36:06.800
<v Speaker 2>So those take like thirty to one hundred million years

0:36:06.800 --> 0:36:07.240
<v Speaker 2>to form.

0:36:07.440 --> 0:36:09.319
<v Speaker 1>Okay, so I think what you're saying is that this

0:36:09.400 --> 0:36:12.600
<v Speaker 1>new model, this rebound model, is saying that we kicked

0:36:12.640 --> 0:36:16.520
<v Speaker 1>off a gassy icy planet a long time ago, before

0:36:16.560 --> 0:36:18.600
<v Speaker 1>we even had Earth and Venus and Mars and the

0:36:18.680 --> 0:36:21.160
<v Speaker 1>rocky planets inside, and that it was due to a

0:36:21.200 --> 0:36:23.880
<v Speaker 1>lot of this gas being blown out of the center.

0:36:23.719 --> 0:36:25.839
<v Speaker 2>Exactly, and as the sort of inner radius of that

0:36:25.920 --> 0:36:30.000
<v Speaker 2>gas passes through these early ice giants and gas planets,

0:36:30.120 --> 0:36:33.080
<v Speaker 2>it triggered that instability. They did their crazy dance with

0:36:33.160 --> 0:36:35.680
<v Speaker 2>Jupiter moving in and the other planets moving out and

0:36:35.760 --> 0:36:38.800
<v Speaker 2>ejected an ice giant planet that left the Solar System,

0:36:38.840 --> 0:36:41.800
<v Speaker 2>And all that happened even before the Earth and Mars

0:36:41.840 --> 0:36:44.440
<v Speaker 2>were formed, so they didn't mess up the formation of

0:36:44.480 --> 0:36:46.600
<v Speaker 2>the Earth and Mars because it was already done by then.

0:36:47.000 --> 0:36:49.360
<v Speaker 1>All right, well, those are both great stories. Now the

0:36:49.440 --> 0:36:52.279
<v Speaker 1>question is can we see the planet that we kicked out?

0:36:52.360 --> 0:36:56.640
<v Speaker 1>Are there lonely dejected planets floating out there in space

0:36:56.680 --> 0:36:59.400
<v Speaker 1>that we can see and maybe identify and track to

0:36:59.680 --> 0:37:02.120
<v Speaker 1>perhaps our Solar System? So let's stick into that, But

0:37:02.160 --> 0:37:17.240
<v Speaker 1>first let's take another quick break. All right, we're asking

0:37:17.280 --> 0:37:22.200
<v Speaker 1>the question, did our Solar system lose a planet or

0:37:22.320 --> 0:37:25.520
<v Speaker 1>I guess shepherd it out peacefully into the cosmos.

0:37:26.000 --> 0:37:28.920
<v Speaker 2>That's the niser model. If anything happened, it sounds like

0:37:28.960 --> 0:37:30.759
<v Speaker 2>we can blame it on the gas giants, Like we

0:37:30.760 --> 0:37:33.399
<v Speaker 2>weren't even around when all of this went down. It's

0:37:33.440 --> 0:37:35.440
<v Speaker 2>just the drama we heard about when we showed up.

0:37:35.680 --> 0:37:36.279
<v Speaker 2>Oh I see.

0:37:36.360 --> 0:37:38.719
<v Speaker 1>It's like, yeah, it's like you're the younger sibling and

0:37:38.920 --> 0:37:40.880
<v Speaker 1>there's all this drama before you were even born.

0:37:41.600 --> 0:37:44.279
<v Speaker 2>Exactly, Like why is everybody so mad? And who is

0:37:44.320 --> 0:37:46.839
<v Speaker 2>this missing sibling everybody's talking about you never met?

0:37:47.880 --> 0:37:50.040
<v Speaker 1>Oh wow, this is just god, this is just turned

0:37:50.040 --> 0:37:53.520
<v Speaker 1>into a Korean drama. I feel like super complicated.

0:37:53.080 --> 0:37:55.040
<v Speaker 2>But it is sort of the story. I mean, what

0:37:55.080 --> 0:37:58.680
<v Speaker 2>we learned from this is that these unstable giant planets,

0:37:58.719 --> 0:38:02.200
<v Speaker 2>the ice giants and the gas basically sculpted the inner

0:38:02.200 --> 0:38:05.520
<v Speaker 2>Solar system. I mean, it didn't disrupt the already formed

0:38:05.520 --> 0:38:08.680
<v Speaker 2>Earth in Mars and Venus, but it created the gravitational

0:38:08.719 --> 0:38:11.879
<v Speaker 2>context for them to form and probably changed how they

0:38:11.880 --> 0:38:15.160
<v Speaker 2>did form, the way younger siblings arrive, and family dramas

0:38:15.160 --> 0:38:16.520
<v Speaker 2>that have existed for years.

0:38:17.200 --> 0:38:20.040
<v Speaker 1>But again, I guess this is just kind of a model, right,

0:38:20.239 --> 0:38:22.480
<v Speaker 1>or sort of a guess to maybe explain some of

0:38:22.520 --> 0:38:25.000
<v Speaker 1>what we see. We don't quite know for sure, right.

0:38:24.840 --> 0:38:27.760
<v Speaker 2>We definitely don't know for sure. We've quibbled before about

0:38:27.760 --> 0:38:31.080
<v Speaker 2>what a guess means. Scientifically, I think we have a model,

0:38:31.200 --> 0:38:33.959
<v Speaker 2>we have some evidence for it, we're never exactly sure.

0:38:34.000 --> 0:38:36.200
<v Speaker 2>I mean, we have not identified a planet and said

0:38:36.560 --> 0:38:40.080
<v Speaker 2>that's our lost planet. It's just easier to explain what

0:38:40.120 --> 0:38:42.120
<v Speaker 2>we see in the universe when you add this to

0:38:42.200 --> 0:38:44.360
<v Speaker 2>the story. But that happens for lots of things, like

0:38:44.400 --> 0:38:47.360
<v Speaker 2>we don't witness the early years of the Earth's formation,

0:38:47.760 --> 0:38:50.080
<v Speaker 2>but we have a pretty detailed story about the formation

0:38:50.160 --> 0:38:52.239
<v Speaker 2>of the Earth based on the patterns of evidence that

0:38:52.239 --> 0:38:55.040
<v Speaker 2>we see in the rocks beneath our feet. And so

0:38:55.120 --> 0:38:57.160
<v Speaker 2>that's a big part of science, is developing a story

0:38:57.200 --> 0:38:59.680
<v Speaker 2>to explain the data, even if you don't directly witness

0:38:59.719 --> 0:39:01.480
<v Speaker 2>all of those events, right, right.

0:39:01.360 --> 0:39:03.239
<v Speaker 1>But I guess what I'm trying to say is that

0:39:03.239 --> 0:39:05.200
<v Speaker 1>we had a pretty good story that seemed to check

0:39:05.200 --> 0:39:07.719
<v Speaker 1>out and make sense before, but then it turned out

0:39:07.760 --> 0:39:08.920
<v Speaker 1>to be not quite correct.

0:39:09.000 --> 0:39:11.120
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, that's true. These stories are always evolving in they're

0:39:11.120 --> 0:39:13.839
<v Speaker 2>getting better, Like we like the nice model, but there

0:39:13.880 --> 0:39:16.160
<v Speaker 2>were some dangling questions about how the Earth and Mars

0:39:16.239 --> 0:39:18.360
<v Speaker 2>survived it. And now we like this new model, the

0:39:18.400 --> 0:39:20.920
<v Speaker 2>rebound model, But there's always going to be dangling questions,

0:39:20.960 --> 0:39:22.840
<v Speaker 2>and somebody's going to come along with a better model

0:39:23.000 --> 0:39:25.560
<v Speaker 2>and maybe tell a different story in five years. It's

0:39:25.600 --> 0:39:27.680
<v Speaker 2>a constantly evolving story.

0:39:27.760 --> 0:39:31.840
<v Speaker 1>I guess. But I wonder if maybe like a smoking

0:39:31.880 --> 0:39:34.399
<v Speaker 1>gun or something to definitely be able to say, like, hey,

0:39:34.400 --> 0:39:36.120
<v Speaker 1>there used to be a planet here in the Solar

0:39:36.200 --> 0:39:38.600
<v Speaker 1>System that we don't have anymore, is to actually maybe

0:39:38.680 --> 0:39:41.480
<v Speaker 1>see this planet that we kicked out or that left

0:39:41.520 --> 0:39:44.120
<v Speaker 1>Liane its own out there in space. Isn't it possible

0:39:44.160 --> 0:39:46.239
<v Speaker 1>that we could see a planet like and track it

0:39:46.280 --> 0:39:49.360
<v Speaker 1>to our Solar system out there beyond our Solar System?

0:39:49.480 --> 0:39:52.239
<v Speaker 2>I suppose it's possible, But we're talking about events that

0:39:52.360 --> 0:39:56.240
<v Speaker 2>happened four billion or more years ago, so that planet

0:39:56.320 --> 0:39:59.280
<v Speaker 2>is pretty far gone by now. If it did leave,

0:39:59.440 --> 0:40:01.840
<v Speaker 2>we can do so of more indirect discoveries, though. We

0:40:01.840 --> 0:40:04.560
<v Speaker 2>can look out and say, are there any rogue planets?

0:40:04.880 --> 0:40:06.919
<v Speaker 2>If this is happening in our Solar System, it should

0:40:06.920 --> 0:40:10.160
<v Speaker 2>be happening in other Solar systems. Shouldn't space be filled

0:40:10.239 --> 0:40:14.040
<v Speaker 2>with these ejected ice giants when it happened in other families,

0:40:14.080 --> 0:40:16.280
<v Speaker 2>not just ours, and we can go and look for those.

0:40:17.120 --> 0:40:19.960
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, we had a whole episode on rogue planets. There

0:40:20.040 --> 0:40:22.760
<v Speaker 1>might be a billions of them out there right exactly.

0:40:22.840 --> 0:40:25.360
<v Speaker 2>We can actually spot some of these using what we

0:40:25.400 --> 0:40:28.000
<v Speaker 2>call micro lensing. If one of these planets out there

0:40:28.000 --> 0:40:30.920
<v Speaker 2>floating between stars, passes in front of a star, like

0:40:30.960 --> 0:40:33.800
<v Speaker 2>a little eclipse, then it'll blink out and actually change

0:40:33.840 --> 0:40:36.080
<v Speaker 2>the way that light bends around the planet. So we

0:40:36.120 --> 0:40:39.080
<v Speaker 2>can use these micro lensing techniques to try to spot them.

0:40:39.280 --> 0:40:42.279
<v Speaker 2>We also have infrared telescopes like the Wise telescope that

0:40:42.320 --> 0:40:45.520
<v Speaker 2>can try to directly image them. These planets don't glow

0:40:45.600 --> 0:40:48.320
<v Speaker 2>in the visible light, but they do have some temperature,

0:40:48.360 --> 0:40:51.480
<v Speaker 2>and everything with the temperature glows in some frequency. These

0:40:51.520 --> 0:40:54.520
<v Speaker 2>would low in infrared, and so it's possible to see them.

0:40:54.880 --> 0:40:57.200
<v Speaker 2>So we have seen a bunch of these rogue planets,

0:40:57.640 --> 0:41:00.160
<v Speaker 2>and so we can estimate that there's like one of

0:41:00.200 --> 0:41:02.759
<v Speaker 2>these things for every star in the galaxy.

0:41:03.040 --> 0:41:05.759
<v Speaker 1>Well, I mean there's ae hundred billion of them right

0:41:05.800 --> 0:41:07.200
<v Speaker 1>in our galaxy.

0:41:06.920 --> 0:41:08.920
<v Speaker 2>Exactly, and we've only spotted a few of them. And

0:41:08.960 --> 0:41:11.239
<v Speaker 2>so the calculation of like how many there are is

0:41:11.440 --> 0:41:14.600
<v Speaker 2>very uncertain. There's a huge extrapolation there, which means a

0:41:14.680 --> 0:41:17.960
<v Speaker 2>huge uncertainty, but we know it's a pretty big number.

0:41:17.960 --> 0:41:20.120
<v Speaker 2>We know it's not just like ten in the galaxy.

0:41:20.280 --> 0:41:22.800
<v Speaker 2>There's lots of these things out there, and that lends

0:41:22.840 --> 0:41:25.800
<v Speaker 2>credence to this story that, like when solar systems form,

0:41:26.239 --> 0:41:29.200
<v Speaker 2>there's a period of instability when big planets can get

0:41:29.280 --> 0:41:29.799
<v Speaker 2>thrown out.

0:41:30.400 --> 0:41:32.400
<v Speaker 1>So we've actually seen these like if you look at

0:41:32.400 --> 0:41:33.880
<v Speaker 1>a picture of the nice guy in the infrared, you

0:41:33.880 --> 0:41:36.120
<v Speaker 1>can see these thoughts moving across the sky.

0:41:36.320 --> 0:41:38.479
<v Speaker 2>We can actually see these planets, and we have seen

0:41:38.600 --> 0:41:41.400
<v Speaker 2>with direct imaging some of these rogue planets. Again, not

0:41:41.600 --> 0:41:44.239
<v Speaker 2>very many, and so we're extrapolating from a handful up

0:41:44.239 --> 0:41:47.040
<v Speaker 2>to a big number. We've definitely seen non zero and

0:41:47.160 --> 0:41:51.319
<v Speaker 2>very recently James Webb saw some really crazy stuff out there.

0:41:51.360 --> 0:41:55.440
<v Speaker 2>They found these Jupiter mass binary objects. They call them jumbos.

0:41:55.480 --> 0:41:58.200
<v Speaker 2>These are pairs of planets floating out there in the

0:41:58.239 --> 0:42:00.279
<v Speaker 2>galaxy with no star near by.

0:42:00.600 --> 0:42:02.640
<v Speaker 1>Wait what, well, first of all, James Webb, you mean

0:42:02.680 --> 0:42:06.960
<v Speaker 1>the telescope right, Yes, not James web from Erie, Pennsylvania.

0:42:07.719 --> 0:42:10.440
<v Speaker 2>We did not exhume the previous NASA administrator and ask

0:42:10.520 --> 0:42:12.200
<v Speaker 2>him to look at the night sky and then write

0:42:12.200 --> 0:42:14.279
<v Speaker 2>down with what he said. Though that would make a

0:42:14.280 --> 0:42:15.960
<v Speaker 2>pretty cool graphic novel. Yeah.

0:42:16.040 --> 0:42:17.799
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, Well, I just don't want to assume everyone knows

0:42:17.840 --> 0:42:18.839
<v Speaker 1>what James Webb is.

0:42:19.560 --> 0:42:22.160
<v Speaker 2>No, you're exactly right. The James web Space Telescope a

0:42:22.280 --> 0:42:24.239
<v Speaker 2>very powerful device that we launched a couple of years

0:42:24.280 --> 0:42:27.600
<v Speaker 2>ago and is an infrared telescope capable of seeing things

0:42:27.640 --> 0:42:32.719
<v Speaker 2>that are pretty cold. Spotted forty two pairs of jumbos.

0:42:32.520 --> 0:42:35.359
<v Speaker 1>WHOA and so is there? Is it weird that they're

0:42:35.360 --> 0:42:37.879
<v Speaker 1>in pairs? Or does it feel normal that they're in pairs? Meaning?

0:42:38.160 --> 0:42:40.080
<v Speaker 1>Does that mean that they were ejective from their Solar

0:42:40.120 --> 0:42:43.280
<v Speaker 1>system in pairs like they left together.

0:42:43.480 --> 0:42:45.960
<v Speaker 2>It's a great question. We don't know the answer to that.

0:42:46.000 --> 0:42:50.120
<v Speaker 2>Simulations suggest that it's unlikely for big planets to leave

0:42:50.160 --> 0:42:52.759
<v Speaker 2>the Solar system together, right. They would have to be

0:42:52.840 --> 0:42:55.800
<v Speaker 2>like bound together and then leave together, which means that

0:42:55.840 --> 0:42:58.520
<v Speaker 2>their fragile orbits around each other would have survived very

0:42:58.600 --> 0:43:03.600
<v Speaker 2>chaotic period. Seems very unlikely. So these are rogue planets

0:43:03.600 --> 0:43:05.359
<v Speaker 2>that are out there without their star, but they don't

0:43:05.400 --> 0:43:08.360
<v Speaker 2>seem to have been ejected from solar systems. So it

0:43:08.440 --> 0:43:10.520
<v Speaker 2>just sort of like adds to the murkiness of what's

0:43:10.520 --> 0:43:12.040
<v Speaker 2>going on with rogue planets.

0:43:12.320 --> 0:43:14.600
<v Speaker 1>Whoa wait, wait, so maybe they were ejected and then

0:43:14.640 --> 0:43:17.400
<v Speaker 1>they met up with another jumbo out there in space.

0:43:18.200 --> 0:43:20.680
<v Speaker 2>We actually don't have a great story to explain how

0:43:20.680 --> 0:43:24.040
<v Speaker 2>these even exist. Like that seems very unlikely for all

0:43:24.080 --> 0:43:26.799
<v Speaker 2>these jupiters to like start dancing around each other just

0:43:26.880 --> 0:43:27.400
<v Speaker 2>in space.

0:43:27.600 --> 0:43:30.080
<v Speaker 1>Well, maybe they have like a planet dating app or something.

0:43:31.640 --> 0:43:34.320
<v Speaker 2>Maybe they're speed dating there, or they're square dancing or something.

0:43:34.440 --> 0:43:35.600
<v Speaker 2>They're all changing partners.

0:43:35.920 --> 0:43:38.760
<v Speaker 1>That's right, they have jumpler under phones.

0:43:39.760 --> 0:43:42.480
<v Speaker 2>Some people suggested maybe they just formed independently, like you

0:43:42.520 --> 0:43:44.800
<v Speaker 2>had a solar system and it didn't have enough stuff

0:43:45.040 --> 0:43:46.840
<v Speaker 2>to actually have a star. You just got a couple

0:43:46.840 --> 0:43:49.200
<v Speaker 2>of jupiters. But we think that there's like a minimum

0:43:49.280 --> 0:43:51.759
<v Speaker 2>amount of mass you need to get like your own

0:43:51.800 --> 0:43:54.000
<v Speaker 2>solar system, otherwise you just get slurped up in like

0:43:54.000 --> 0:43:57.800
<v Speaker 2>a neighboring solar system when that huge stellar nurseries breaking

0:43:57.880 --> 0:44:00.480
<v Speaker 2>up into chunks that form solar systems. So we think

0:44:00.480 --> 0:44:03.000
<v Speaker 2>that these things are probably too small to have seeded

0:44:03.040 --> 0:44:05.960
<v Speaker 2>their own structure and be their own solar system. We

0:44:06.000 --> 0:44:08.760
<v Speaker 2>don't think they could have been ejected from other solar systems.

0:44:08.960 --> 0:44:11.319
<v Speaker 2>So it's something of a question of where these came from,

0:44:11.400 --> 0:44:13.279
<v Speaker 2>you know, just to paint the picture that like, there's

0:44:13.320 --> 0:44:14.880
<v Speaker 2>a lot we still don't know. There's a lot of

0:44:14.880 --> 0:44:15.719
<v Speaker 2>guessing going on.

0:44:16.080 --> 0:44:19.280
<v Speaker 1>But I guess if they didn't come from a solar system,

0:44:19.480 --> 0:44:21.840
<v Speaker 1>then that doesn't really tell us anything about this idea

0:44:21.840 --> 0:44:25.800
<v Speaker 1>of how often solar systems kick out planets exactly.

0:44:25.840 --> 0:44:28.400
<v Speaker 2>But it adds doubt to the argument that because we

0:44:28.440 --> 0:44:31.400
<v Speaker 2>see a bunch of rogue planets out there that suggest

0:44:31.480 --> 0:44:33.799
<v Speaker 2>that planets are lost from solar systems, because there are

0:44:33.840 --> 0:44:36.719
<v Speaker 2>planets out there whose formations we just don't understand and

0:44:36.719 --> 0:44:38.680
<v Speaker 2>we think don't come from having been lost by a

0:44:38.680 --> 0:44:39.320
<v Speaker 2>solar system.

0:44:39.400 --> 0:44:41.120
<v Speaker 1>All right, well, I guess to answer the question of

0:44:41.160 --> 0:44:43.840
<v Speaker 1>the episode, has our solar system lost any planets? The

0:44:43.960 --> 0:44:50.399
<v Speaker 1>answer is maybe, we guess. So we guess. Maybe we

0:44:50.480 --> 0:44:53.680
<v Speaker 1>used to have a brother, an older brother, but now

0:44:53.840 --> 0:44:56.680
<v Speaker 1>nobody likes to talk about him or her, and it's

0:44:56.800 --> 0:45:00.520
<v Speaker 1>very awkward. It makes all the models break, all the

0:45:00.520 --> 0:45:01.560
<v Speaker 1>pets are uncomfortable.

0:45:01.680 --> 0:45:03.680
<v Speaker 2>Almost all of the models we use to explain the

0:45:03.680 --> 0:45:07.920
<v Speaker 2>solar system do have an additional planet. It's not absolutely required.

0:45:08.200 --> 0:45:10.960
<v Speaker 2>It's possible to explain the Solar System without an additional

0:45:11.040 --> 0:45:14.200
<v Speaker 2>planet that got ejected during one of these early instabilities.

0:45:14.520 --> 0:45:17.040
<v Speaker 2>But it just makes the story come together more crisply.

0:45:17.080 --> 0:45:19.440
<v Speaker 2>It makes our Solar system seem less unlikely.

0:45:19.760 --> 0:45:21.600
<v Speaker 1>Now, how does this match up with I know there

0:45:21.640 --> 0:45:24.160
<v Speaker 1>are scientists that think that we have maybe a ninth

0:45:24.200 --> 0:45:26.640
<v Speaker 1>planet in our Solar system. We just can see it

0:45:27.120 --> 0:45:27.960
<v Speaker 1>planet X, right.

0:45:28.160 --> 0:45:30.640
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, there are some people who look at like gravitational

0:45:30.640 --> 0:45:33.040
<v Speaker 2>aberrations in the orbits of our planet to see if

0:45:33.040 --> 0:45:35.600
<v Speaker 2>there's something else out there tugging on it. But there's

0:45:35.640 --> 0:45:38.320
<v Speaker 2>no conclusive evidence for that. It's like very very gentle,

0:45:38.640 --> 0:45:40.759
<v Speaker 2>and there's a lot of disagreement about whether it's just

0:45:40.880 --> 0:45:42.640
<v Speaker 2>noise or has other explanations.

0:45:42.719 --> 0:45:45.000
<v Speaker 1>It's almost sort of the same, right, They use simulations

0:45:45.040 --> 0:45:47.480
<v Speaker 1>and try to figure out what would best explain what

0:45:47.520 --> 0:45:48.000
<v Speaker 1>we have now.

0:45:48.080 --> 0:45:50.600
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, exactly, but the data there are not conclusive.

0:45:50.880 --> 0:45:54.040
<v Speaker 1>All right. Well, another interesting lesson to keep track of

0:45:54.040 --> 0:45:56.520
<v Speaker 1>your planets. Don't lose them because once they're gone, they're

0:45:56.520 --> 0:45:57.120
<v Speaker 1>gone forever.

0:45:57.400 --> 0:45:59.480
<v Speaker 2>And try to understand where you came from and what's

0:45:59.480 --> 0:46:02.440
<v Speaker 2>your contact is, what happened before you showed up on

0:46:02.480 --> 0:46:03.000
<v Speaker 2>the scene.

0:46:03.120 --> 0:46:05.880
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, well, not that we have much influence over what happens,

0:46:05.920 --> 0:46:07.719
<v Speaker 1>but it's interesting to think about what might happen in

0:46:07.719 --> 0:46:10.000
<v Speaker 1>the future, Like, is it possible that the Earth might

0:46:10.040 --> 0:46:13.000
<v Speaker 1>get kicked out of the Solar System right in the

0:46:13.000 --> 0:46:13.800
<v Speaker 1>future exactly?

0:46:13.880 --> 0:46:16.480
<v Speaker 2>The difference between these models tells a very different story.

0:46:16.600 --> 0:46:20.040
<v Speaker 2>If it really is lots of gentle tugs from planet Esimals, well,

0:46:20.040 --> 0:46:21.560
<v Speaker 2>that could still happen in the future. We have the

0:46:21.680 --> 0:46:24.200
<v Speaker 2>Orc Cloud, we have the Kuyper Belt. There's still tugging

0:46:24.320 --> 0:46:27.360
<v Speaker 2>going on. But if it was something that only happened

0:46:27.360 --> 0:46:30.000
<v Speaker 2>in the very early formation of the Solar System itself,

0:46:30.160 --> 0:46:32.799
<v Speaker 2>as this gas was pushed out, that's not something that's

0:46:32.880 --> 0:46:35.799
<v Speaker 2>likely to be reproduced, and so that level of instability

0:46:35.800 --> 0:46:37.200
<v Speaker 2>is probably not going to happen again.

0:46:37.320 --> 0:46:40.080
<v Speaker 1>Now, Daniel, if we did have an icy gas planet before,

0:46:40.760 --> 0:46:42.759
<v Speaker 1>but it was filled with white chocolate, are you happy

0:46:42.840 --> 0:46:45.080
<v Speaker 1>that it's gone or are you sad that we don't

0:46:45.080 --> 0:46:45.640
<v Speaker 1>have anymore?

0:46:45.719 --> 0:46:47.600
<v Speaker 2>No, it's bittersweet. I wish it's the best.

0:46:48.760 --> 0:46:51.000
<v Speaker 1>No, it's not bitter, it's sweet. It's white chocolate. That's

0:46:51.000 --> 0:46:52.240
<v Speaker 1>the whole point of white chocolate.

0:46:53.320 --> 0:46:54.960
<v Speaker 2>It's oversweetened. That's the problem.

0:46:55.080 --> 0:46:56.439
<v Speaker 1>But maybe it'd be good for you because it would

0:46:56.480 --> 0:46:59.000
<v Speaker 1>make all the white chocolate lovers go to this planet

0:46:59.120 --> 0:47:00.560
<v Speaker 1>and leave ours exactly.

0:47:00.680 --> 0:47:04.160
<v Speaker 2>Let's arrange transit to the frozen planet of white chocolate.

0:47:04.280 --> 0:47:05.240
<v Speaker 1>Well call it white.

0:47:07.120 --> 0:47:08.000
<v Speaker 2>No son of mine?

0:47:10.239 --> 0:47:12.279
<v Speaker 1>All right, Well, we hope you enjoyed that. Thanks for

0:47:12.360 --> 0:47:14.520
<v Speaker 1>joining us, See you next time.

0:47:19.080 --> 0:47:22.280
<v Speaker 2>For more science and curiosity, come find us on social media,

0:47:22.360 --> 0:47:26.920
<v Speaker 2>where we answer questions and post videos. We're on Twitter, Discord, Instant,

0:47:27.000 --> 0:47:30.440
<v Speaker 2>and now TikTok. Thanks for listening, and remember that Daniel

0:47:30.480 --> 0:47:33.920
<v Speaker 2>and Jorge Explain the Universe is a production of iHeartRadio.

0:47:34.200 --> 0:47:39.359
<v Speaker 2>For more podcasts from iHeartRadio, visit the iHeartRadio app, Apple Podcasts,

0:47:39.480 --> 0:47:41.840
<v Speaker 2>or wherever you listen to your favorite shows.