WEBVTT - Crab Bag, Part 3: The Crab is a Lonely Hunter

0:00:03.000 --> 0:00:06.760
<v Speaker 1>Welcome to Stuff to Blow Your Mind, production of iHeartRadio.

0:00:12.760 --> 0:00:15.320
<v Speaker 2>Hey, welcome to Stuff to Blow Your Mind. My name

0:00:15.360 --> 0:00:15.960
<v Speaker 2>is Robert.

0:00:15.840 --> 0:00:19.040
<v Speaker 3>Lamb and I am Joe McCormick, and we're back with

0:00:19.200 --> 0:00:22.840
<v Speaker 3>our crab Bag twenty twenty six series. This is a

0:00:23.000 --> 0:00:25.400
<v Speaker 3>kind of chef salad of all things crab.

0:00:26.120 --> 0:00:26.280
<v Speaker 2>Now.

0:00:26.320 --> 0:00:28.480
<v Speaker 3>We were just out for a week in between when

0:00:28.480 --> 0:00:31.800
<v Speaker 3>we recorded the last couple of crab episodes, and this

0:00:31.840 --> 0:00:34.479
<v Speaker 3>one's a rob Did anything krabby happen to you in

0:00:34.520 --> 0:00:35.440
<v Speaker 3>the past week.

0:00:35.640 --> 0:00:38.199
<v Speaker 2>Well, let's see. Put me on the spot here. I

0:00:38.240 --> 0:00:41.640
<v Speaker 2>spent my time in Arizona, so I didn't really see

0:00:41.640 --> 0:00:44.200
<v Speaker 2>any actual crabs. But I did go to the Musical

0:00:44.200 --> 0:00:47.360
<v Speaker 2>Instrument Museum in Phoenix, and I did see some musical

0:00:47.400 --> 0:00:51.720
<v Speaker 2>instruments that were shaped like crabs, which makes sense for

0:00:51.760 --> 0:00:53.800
<v Speaker 2>a number of reasons. The big one that we're going

0:00:53.840 --> 0:00:55.600
<v Speaker 2>to keep coming back to in this series. It's just

0:00:55.720 --> 0:01:00.920
<v Speaker 2>that crabs are fascinating, just their basic body shape, their movements.

0:01:01.240 --> 0:01:03.000
<v Speaker 2>We can't get enough of them, and we want to

0:01:03.080 --> 0:01:07.320
<v Speaker 2>reproduce their bodies in our art and in our tools.

0:01:07.880 --> 0:01:09.920
<v Speaker 3>This is interesting. I didn't know this would connect to

0:01:10.280 --> 0:01:13.360
<v Speaker 3>a major theme of today's episode, which is ye crab

0:01:13.400 --> 0:01:18.240
<v Speaker 3>inspired technology. So in the previous two episodes of this

0:01:18.400 --> 0:01:23.680
<v Speaker 3>series we talked about, first the sixteenth century legend of

0:01:23.760 --> 0:01:28.480
<v Speaker 3>the miracle crab, associated with the Catholic missionary figure Saint

0:01:28.560 --> 0:01:32.080
<v Speaker 3>Francis Xavier. This was a crab said to have carried

0:01:32.080 --> 0:01:35.560
<v Speaker 3>a lost crucifix out out of the ocean, aloft in

0:01:35.600 --> 0:01:39.280
<v Speaker 3>its claws and back to its original owner, the Saint

0:01:39.319 --> 0:01:43.040
<v Speaker 3>Francis Xavior I just mentioned. We talked a bit about

0:01:43.080 --> 0:01:47.480
<v Speaker 3>the loose connection between that story and a real species

0:01:47.680 --> 0:01:51.320
<v Speaker 3>known as the crucifix crab, getting a bit into the

0:01:51.440 --> 0:01:55.680
<v Speaker 3>question of it's what this crab's cross shaped markings are

0:01:55.680 --> 0:02:00.280
<v Speaker 3>probably four biologically speaking. This led in the second episode

0:02:00.360 --> 0:02:04.200
<v Speaker 3>we did into a broader discussion of object carrying behavior

0:02:04.240 --> 0:02:07.960
<v Speaker 3>in crabs, something that actually does happen quite a bit

0:02:08.000 --> 0:02:12.200
<v Speaker 3>in nature. Different forms of object carrying in different crab lineages,

0:02:13.919 --> 0:02:16.600
<v Speaker 3>none of them really matched what we find in the

0:02:16.600 --> 0:02:19.720
<v Speaker 3>miracle story. The crabs that carry things usually do so

0:02:19.880 --> 0:02:22.960
<v Speaker 3>on their backs or with their back legs, rather than

0:02:23.000 --> 0:02:27.400
<v Speaker 3>in their primary clause. The main exception to this generalization

0:02:27.560 --> 0:02:30.399
<v Speaker 3>is the boxer crab, which does carry things in its

0:02:30.440 --> 0:02:34.360
<v Speaker 3>main clause, but those things tend to be living anemonies,

0:02:34.680 --> 0:02:37.720
<v Speaker 3>which they use for feeding in defense, not inanimate objects.

0:02:38.240 --> 0:02:41.240
<v Speaker 3>We also talked about a type of burrowing crab lineage

0:02:41.320 --> 0:02:45.960
<v Speaker 3>known as the frog crabs. This includes the species Ranina ranina,

0:02:46.560 --> 0:02:50.080
<v Speaker 3>and these crabs have gone through an unusual evolutionary pattern

0:02:50.120 --> 0:02:56.000
<v Speaker 3>you might call decarsonization or uncrabification, becoming less like their

0:02:56.080 --> 0:03:00.600
<v Speaker 3>crab cousins and a bit more like their lobster shaped ands,

0:03:00.919 --> 0:03:04.160
<v Speaker 3>with a front to back elongated body. They don't regain

0:03:04.320 --> 0:03:08.720
<v Speaker 3>the long, muscular lobster swimming tail, but they do have

0:03:08.919 --> 0:03:11.360
<v Speaker 3>a longer body and a tendency to move forward and

0:03:11.440 --> 0:03:14.280
<v Speaker 3>backward rather than side to side and rob correct me

0:03:14.280 --> 0:03:16.200
<v Speaker 3>if I'm wrong. I think the idea was this is

0:03:16.320 --> 0:03:20.240
<v Speaker 3>this elongation front to back of the body is probably

0:03:20.320 --> 0:03:24.959
<v Speaker 3>related to the frog crabs tendency to be backwards burrowing species.

0:03:25.160 --> 0:03:28.480
<v Speaker 2>That is the reason for it. Yeah. Yeah, It just

0:03:28.520 --> 0:03:30.720
<v Speaker 2>goes to show once more, with evolution the card is

0:03:30.760 --> 0:03:31.880
<v Speaker 2>always subject to change.

0:03:32.200 --> 0:03:35.200
<v Speaker 3>Yeah yeah, yeah. And there really is no forward or

0:03:35.240 --> 0:03:38.720
<v Speaker 3>backward in evolution. There's just all different directions. It's like space,

0:03:38.760 --> 0:03:43.240
<v Speaker 3>there's no upper down. We also talked briefly about some

0:03:43.400 --> 0:03:47.280
<v Speaker 3>older reports of a very interesting crab shaped beast in

0:03:47.360 --> 0:03:51.360
<v Speaker 3>the sorcery traditions of the London people of Zambia. This

0:03:51.600 --> 0:03:54.680
<v Speaker 3>creature is known as the Nkala, which was described as

0:03:54.680 --> 0:03:58.160
<v Speaker 3>being a four foot wide crab with two heads, one

0:03:58.200 --> 0:04:01.800
<v Speaker 3>head front and one head back and some characteristics of

0:04:01.920 --> 0:04:04.360
<v Speaker 3>a hippopotamus. I think at least one of the heads

0:04:04.400 --> 0:04:06.680
<v Speaker 3>is said to be like that of a hippopotamus, and

0:04:06.800 --> 0:04:09.720
<v Speaker 3>this creature was said to attack a person by eating

0:04:09.800 --> 0:04:13.880
<v Speaker 3>their shadow. Very interesting. We also talked a bit about

0:04:13.920 --> 0:04:17.640
<v Speaker 3>the phenomenon of seeing faces in crab bodies, and of

0:04:17.640 --> 0:04:20.080
<v Speaker 3>course we talked about crab inspired wrestling acts.

0:04:20.200 --> 0:04:21.919
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, very briefly, very briefly.

0:04:22.880 --> 0:04:25.080
<v Speaker 3>And so we're back today to talk crabs once again.

0:04:25.839 --> 0:04:27.600
<v Speaker 3>So Rob, if you don't mind, I'm going to kick

0:04:27.640 --> 0:04:31.479
<v Speaker 3>things off today by talking about a weird connection between

0:04:31.920 --> 0:04:35.400
<v Speaker 3>a type of crab, not necessarily a true crab, not

0:04:35.440 --> 0:04:38.360
<v Speaker 3>a bracky urine crab, but a crab by common convention

0:04:39.600 --> 0:04:45.880
<v Speaker 3>as an idea for biomimicry, a sort of steampunk crab machine.

0:04:45.839 --> 0:04:48.520
<v Speaker 2>Crab war machines. Right. I think this will be exciting

0:04:48.560 --> 0:04:51.600
<v Speaker 2>for a lot of our listeners because in some areas

0:04:51.800 --> 0:04:57.280
<v Speaker 2>areas of science fiction particularly sci fi warfare such as

0:04:57.400 --> 0:05:01.160
<v Speaker 2>your Warhammer forty thousands. You end up you end up

0:05:01.160 --> 0:05:05.360
<v Speaker 2>with a lot of crab based designs for big or

0:05:05.440 --> 0:05:09.680
<v Speaker 2>small stalking machines or some sort of mechs that end

0:05:09.800 --> 0:05:12.359
<v Speaker 2>up looking like crabs, because again, we just were so

0:05:12.480 --> 0:05:16.440
<v Speaker 2>fascinated with a design, and when we start imagining fantastic

0:05:16.920 --> 0:05:19.440
<v Speaker 2>machines of war, we think of the crab because it

0:05:19.480 --> 0:05:22.440
<v Speaker 2>looks like a little machine of war to optize.

0:05:22.320 --> 0:05:25.800
<v Speaker 3>It looks dangerous, it looks like it means business, and

0:05:25.880 --> 0:05:28.880
<v Speaker 3>it's yeah, something that maybe one should be afraid of.

0:05:29.440 --> 0:05:33.320
<v Speaker 3>Something about arthropods generally, and I would say especially crabs,

0:05:33.400 --> 0:05:37.880
<v Speaker 3>especially you know, decapod crustaceans. It has more of a

0:05:37.960 --> 0:05:43.400
<v Speaker 3>kind of mechanical joint and piston kind of feeling about

0:05:43.400 --> 0:05:46.159
<v Speaker 3>it than say mammals or reptiles or birds do.

0:05:46.760 --> 0:05:51.919
<v Speaker 2>Yeah. Yeah, the exoskeleton lends itself well to comparisons to

0:05:52.440 --> 0:05:56.320
<v Speaker 2>our armor technology, to our tool technology, and then much

0:05:56.360 --> 0:05:59.200
<v Speaker 2>later on to our automatons in our robots. Yeah.

0:05:59.320 --> 0:06:02.400
<v Speaker 3>Okay, so we're gonna let slip the crabs of war

0:06:02.640 --> 0:06:05.000
<v Speaker 3>and go all the way back to the year eighteen

0:06:05.120 --> 0:06:09.880
<v Speaker 3>sixty four and talk about an obscure crab inspired proposal

0:06:10.240 --> 0:06:14.680
<v Speaker 3>for this great mechanism of belligerents called the King Crab Warship.

0:06:15.839 --> 0:06:17.920
<v Speaker 3>So the text that I want to talk about is

0:06:18.000 --> 0:06:22.200
<v Speaker 3>a letter appearing in the January thirtieth, eighteen sixty four

0:06:22.400 --> 0:06:25.839
<v Speaker 3>edition of thus Scientific Americans back when it had the

0:06:26.160 --> 0:06:30.800
<v Speaker 3>in the Scientific American. This is the ancestor to the

0:06:30.800 --> 0:06:34.640
<v Speaker 3>publication still called Scientific American today, though in the nineteenth

0:06:34.640 --> 0:06:38.440
<v Speaker 3>century it was a somewhat different publication. It was a

0:06:38.480 --> 0:06:42.080
<v Speaker 3>weekly newspaper at the time that was focused less on

0:06:42.200 --> 0:06:45.120
<v Speaker 3>pure science and more on technology, with a lot of

0:06:45.160 --> 0:06:49.680
<v Speaker 3>news about recent patents and design improvements for machines.

0:06:49.400 --> 0:06:50.679
<v Speaker 2>Some more industry centric.

0:06:50.720 --> 0:06:54.560
<v Speaker 3>I guess yeah. And so this letter in Scientific American

0:06:54.720 --> 0:06:58.839
<v Speaker 3>comes from a correspondent called c DK, known by initials

0:06:58.920 --> 0:07:04.560
<v Speaker 3>CDKA in Frankfort, Pennsylvania. CDK begins this letter with a

0:07:04.640 --> 0:07:08.920
<v Speaker 3>long wind up about how all of the best architectural

0:07:08.960 --> 0:07:13.720
<v Speaker 3>and mechanical designs are actually prefigured by objects in the

0:07:13.800 --> 0:07:18.119
<v Speaker 3>natural world, writing quote, perfection is only to be found

0:07:18.160 --> 0:07:21.760
<v Speaker 3>amongst the numerous specimens of the handiwork of the Great Creator,

0:07:22.160 --> 0:07:25.000
<v Speaker 3>which he has placed so lavishly around us for our

0:07:25.120 --> 0:07:27.920
<v Speaker 3>use and instruction, and which we should make the proper

0:07:27.920 --> 0:07:31.440
<v Speaker 3>application of the lessons which are continually placed before us.

0:07:31.720 --> 0:07:33.600
<v Speaker 2>Oh so like a religious biomimicry.

0:07:33.720 --> 0:07:37.560
<v Speaker 3>Okay, very much the tone of this letter, and also

0:07:37.760 --> 0:07:40.400
<v Speaker 3>something that we'll get more into this in a few minutes,

0:07:40.440 --> 0:07:42.360
<v Speaker 3>but kind of seem to be in the air at

0:07:42.360 --> 0:07:47.320
<v Speaker 3>the time. Other examples given by the author include the

0:07:47.440 --> 0:07:51.840
<v Speaker 3>architectural principle of the arch and how CDK claims this

0:07:51.880 --> 0:07:54.400
<v Speaker 3>can be observed in the bones of the human skeleton.

0:07:55.080 --> 0:07:58.640
<v Speaker 3>Also the roots of the oak tree, which CDK says

0:07:58.800 --> 0:08:00.960
<v Speaker 3>show us the best way to lay the foundations of

0:08:01.040 --> 0:08:06.480
<v Speaker 3>lighthouses and towers. And then also fossil shells, which show

0:08:06.560 --> 0:08:11.720
<v Speaker 3>us how to build impenetrable fortifications. A CDK says, quote,

0:08:11.760 --> 0:08:14.320
<v Speaker 3>and now, when the public mind and the minds of

0:08:14.320 --> 0:08:18.240
<v Speaker 3>inventors are run wild over the changed system of warfare

0:08:18.600 --> 0:08:22.600
<v Speaker 3>inaugurated with heavy guns and shot proof vessels, let us

0:08:22.640 --> 0:08:25.640
<v Speaker 3>see what nature will do for us. She furnishes a

0:08:25.680 --> 0:08:28.240
<v Speaker 3>model of an engine of war, which, if made of

0:08:28.280 --> 0:08:32.640
<v Speaker 3>suitable size, could destroy any vessel now afloat, in spite

0:08:32.720 --> 0:08:36.840
<v Speaker 3>of iron plates, big guns, and almost anything else. I

0:08:36.920 --> 0:08:41.319
<v Speaker 3>allude to the species of crab l Cyclops, the king

0:08:41.559 --> 0:08:45.959
<v Speaker 3>crab or horse hoof found on the coast of New Jersey.

0:08:46.840 --> 0:08:48.280
<v Speaker 3>Now I look this up to make sure I was

0:08:48.760 --> 0:08:50.920
<v Speaker 3>getting right what kind of animal he is talking about here.

0:08:50.960 --> 0:08:53.000
<v Speaker 3>I think this has to be a reference to the

0:08:53.040 --> 0:08:56.560
<v Speaker 3>Atlantic horseshoe crab, which is now known not as l

0:08:56.640 --> 0:09:01.280
<v Speaker 3>cyclops but by the scientific name Lemulus polyphemus. It was

0:09:01.480 --> 0:09:05.760
<v Speaker 3>previously known as Lemulus cyclops in some by some people

0:09:05.800 --> 0:09:08.920
<v Speaker 3>in the past. Of course, Polyphemus is the name of

0:09:09.000 --> 0:09:12.320
<v Speaker 3>the famous Cyclops from Greek mythology, appearing in the Odyssey.

0:09:13.040 --> 0:09:17.199
<v Speaker 3>So this is the proposal make a king crab warship

0:09:17.400 --> 0:09:22.240
<v Speaker 3>inspired by the flawless natural design of the Atlantic horseshoe crab.

0:09:23.360 --> 0:09:26.080
<v Speaker 3>So before we go on with the letter and the proposal,

0:09:26.080 --> 0:09:28.080
<v Speaker 3>I think maybe we should do a quick segment on

0:09:28.120 --> 0:09:31.360
<v Speaker 3>the horseshoe crab, or as CDK calls it, the horse hoof.

0:09:31.920 --> 0:09:36.079
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, yeah, the horseshoe crab. To be clear, it's certainly

0:09:36.080 --> 0:09:39.040
<v Speaker 2>fair game for this podcast series that we're calling it

0:09:39.120 --> 0:09:41.320
<v Speaker 2>a crab. But we do have to stress again the

0:09:41.320 --> 0:09:44.560
<v Speaker 2>horseshoe crabs they're not true crabs. They're not even crustaceans.

0:09:45.120 --> 0:09:50.320
<v Speaker 2>Their arthropod calliserates more closely related to iraqnts, but they're

0:09:50.360 --> 0:09:53.440
<v Speaker 2>famously weird. If you've had the chance to see one

0:09:53.440 --> 0:09:56.439
<v Speaker 2>in the wild, you know how bizarre they are, or

0:09:56.440 --> 0:09:59.480
<v Speaker 2>even if you've just seen the shell, it's phenomenal.

0:10:00.000 --> 0:10:01.480
<v Speaker 3>We've done whole episodes on them in the past.

0:10:01.559 --> 0:10:06.000
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, yeah, I think we've talked about their biomedical applications before,

0:10:06.040 --> 0:10:09.920
<v Speaker 2>which we'll allude to in passing here. But yeah, they're

0:10:09.920 --> 0:10:14.400
<v Speaker 2>also pretty famous because they're notable living fossils, having existed

0:10:14.440 --> 0:10:18.880
<v Speaker 2>in the world largely unchanged for at least two hundred

0:10:18.880 --> 0:10:21.000
<v Speaker 2>million years and existed for something like four hundred and

0:10:21.040 --> 0:10:23.480
<v Speaker 2>forty five million years. I've also seen three hundred million

0:10:23.559 --> 0:10:28.280
<v Speaker 2>years thrown out there. Only four living species remain today

0:10:29.040 --> 0:10:30.840
<v Speaker 2>any way you slice it. Yeah, they've been around for

0:10:30.920 --> 0:10:33.440
<v Speaker 2>hundreds of millions of years, and they are like a

0:10:33.480 --> 0:10:34.600
<v Speaker 2>snapshot of the past.

0:10:35.440 --> 0:10:37.880
<v Speaker 3>My general understanding is that they're thought to go back

0:10:37.880 --> 0:10:38.760
<v Speaker 3>to the Ordovisian.

0:10:39.640 --> 0:10:45.120
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, so, horseshoe crabs have a pretty iconic appearance. They

0:10:45.120 --> 0:10:49.760
<v Speaker 2>have this broad front shell, this cephalo thorax shell, so

0:10:49.800 --> 0:10:54.000
<v Speaker 2>it's like the head thorax commind shell with wide spaced eyes.

0:10:54.360 --> 0:10:57.720
<v Speaker 2>You see them on either side little dimples, and it

0:10:57.800 --> 0:11:00.000
<v Speaker 2>ends up kind of giving you the look and feel

0:11:00.400 --> 0:11:02.160
<v Speaker 2>of a helm. You know, we can't help but to

0:11:02.160 --> 0:11:06.160
<v Speaker 2>compare it to our technology. This portion tapers back to

0:11:06.440 --> 0:11:09.440
<v Speaker 2>the posterior portion of the shell and then to a

0:11:09.760 --> 0:11:15.960
<v Speaker 2>spike like tail underneath the protection of their exoskeleton. The

0:11:16.000 --> 0:11:18.680
<v Speaker 2>exoskeleton is going to be sand colored in juveniles and

0:11:18.720 --> 0:11:23.360
<v Speaker 2>then this signature brownish green and most adults. Underneath this

0:11:23.400 --> 0:11:27.640
<v Speaker 2>shell they boast five pairs of jointed legs. And then

0:11:27.679 --> 0:11:30.040
<v Speaker 2>they spend most of their time rooting around through the

0:11:30.080 --> 0:11:33.640
<v Speaker 2>sediment for worms and moths. And they can survive outside

0:11:33.640 --> 0:11:36.440
<v Speaker 2>of the water for extended periods of time, even if

0:11:36.480 --> 0:11:39.680
<v Speaker 2>their gills stay moist, and they can swim upside down

0:11:39.720 --> 0:11:43.440
<v Speaker 2>in the water really cool. They do have to crawl

0:11:43.520 --> 0:11:46.439
<v Speaker 2>up on the sandy beaches to mate and to lay eggs,

0:11:46.840 --> 0:11:49.839
<v Speaker 2>and this is where most people are going to encounter.

0:11:49.520 --> 0:11:51.880
<v Speaker 3>Them, and it makes sense, especially if we're talking about

0:11:51.920 --> 0:11:55.600
<v Speaker 3>the Atlantic horseshoe crab that CDK says, you will have

0:11:55.840 --> 0:11:58.559
<v Speaker 3>encountered these creatures on the shores of New Jersey.

0:11:59.040 --> 0:12:01.520
<v Speaker 2>That's right. We'll get back to their range in just

0:12:01.520 --> 0:12:05.320
<v Speaker 2>a second. But but yeah, that is, that is, that

0:12:05.440 --> 0:12:08.880
<v Speaker 2>is where you will find them. My wife's grandmother had

0:12:08.880 --> 0:12:11.599
<v Speaker 2>a story about encountering horseshoe crebs on the beaches of

0:12:11.640 --> 0:12:15.640
<v Speaker 2>the Great Outer Banks where according to this tale, and

0:12:15.679 --> 0:12:17.400
<v Speaker 2>I don't know to what extent this might have been

0:12:17.440 --> 0:12:20.640
<v Speaker 2>embellished a little bit over the years, as family stories

0:12:20.679 --> 0:12:25.120
<v Speaker 2>tend to, but she came across these horseshoe crabs on

0:12:25.160 --> 0:12:27.040
<v Speaker 2>the beach and she thought that they were stuck, that

0:12:27.080 --> 0:12:29.920
<v Speaker 2>they'd been like washed up, and so she tried to

0:12:29.920 --> 0:12:31.679
<v Speaker 2>help them out by throwing them all back in the water,

0:12:32.480 --> 0:12:35.360
<v Speaker 2>and then found out much later on that she'd unwittingly

0:12:35.400 --> 0:12:42.079
<v Speaker 2>disturbed their mating loops. Yep, but that spike like tail

0:12:42.360 --> 0:12:45.360
<v Speaker 2>I think is definitely part. Again, the front portion of

0:12:45.400 --> 0:12:47.719
<v Speaker 2>the horseshoe crab looks like an armored helm, and then

0:12:47.760 --> 0:12:49.880
<v Speaker 2>we have this what looks like a vicious looking spike

0:12:49.960 --> 0:12:54.400
<v Speaker 2>in the back. Yeah, this is the the telson, and

0:12:54.679 --> 0:12:58.400
<v Speaker 2>the telson takes different forms in different arthropods. If you've

0:12:58.400 --> 0:13:01.720
<v Speaker 2>ever shelled shrimp before, you've encountered a much shorter telson

0:13:01.840 --> 0:13:05.800
<v Speaker 2>spike amid the fantails. The stinger of a scorpion is

0:13:05.800 --> 0:13:11.000
<v Speaker 2>technically a telson. Now, the horseshoe crab does have a

0:13:11.040 --> 0:13:13.680
<v Speaker 2>fearsome looking telson, but this is not a weapon. It

0:13:13.760 --> 0:13:16.880
<v Speaker 2>is not something it uses to stab self defensively at

0:13:16.920 --> 0:13:20.800
<v Speaker 2>things messing with it and so forth. It is most

0:13:21.559 --> 0:13:23.800
<v Speaker 2>The most observable function of this for humans is that

0:13:23.840 --> 0:13:26.640
<v Speaker 2>it is a self riding tool. If they are flipped

0:13:26.679 --> 0:13:29.800
<v Speaker 2>on their backs on the beach, you know, exposing their

0:13:29.960 --> 0:13:32.440
<v Speaker 2>unprotected side, they can use it to flip back over

0:13:32.559 --> 0:13:35.080
<v Speaker 2>the way they want to be. They will get flipped

0:13:35.120 --> 0:13:37.280
<v Speaker 2>over in the surf as they're coming out or going

0:13:37.320 --> 0:13:40.240
<v Speaker 2>back in. It is also useful as a rudder for

0:13:40.480 --> 0:13:44.240
<v Speaker 2>swimming when in the water. And since the telson, like

0:13:44.280 --> 0:13:47.679
<v Speaker 2>other parts of their bodies, have photoreceptors on them, it

0:13:48.280 --> 0:13:49.960
<v Speaker 2>also wouldn't be out of line to think of this

0:13:50.000 --> 0:13:51.360
<v Speaker 2>as a sensory appendage.

0:13:52.080 --> 0:13:56.079
<v Speaker 3>Okay, but yeah, that is interesting because CDK, I think

0:13:56.240 --> 0:13:58.800
<v Speaker 3>is going to allude to the idea that the telson

0:13:59.040 --> 0:14:01.800
<v Speaker 3>is a weapon. I don't know we can It's kind

0:14:01.800 --> 0:14:04.120
<v Speaker 3>of hard to tell exactly what he's saying in some

0:14:04.160 --> 0:14:06.280
<v Speaker 3>parts of this, but I think he thinks it might

0:14:06.280 --> 0:14:09.320
<v Speaker 3>be a weapon. But yeah, interesting to think that it is.

0:14:09.400 --> 0:14:13.520
<v Speaker 3>Actually it is a lever primarily for riding the body,

0:14:13.559 --> 0:14:16.640
<v Speaker 3>and I think also maybe used for steering when swimming

0:14:16.679 --> 0:14:17.120
<v Speaker 3>in the water.

0:14:17.360 --> 0:14:19.680
<v Speaker 2>Correct, Yeah, yeah, yeah, it's like a rudder for swimming

0:14:19.680 --> 0:14:23.200
<v Speaker 2>in the water. Yeah. Now, one thing that it's coming

0:14:23.200 --> 0:14:25.520
<v Speaker 2>back to the range. It is interesting to note that

0:14:25.720 --> 0:14:29.680
<v Speaker 2>the four species of horseshoe crabs in the world today,

0:14:29.960 --> 0:14:33.120
<v Speaker 2>they do enjoy a wide range, but that range does

0:14:33.160 --> 0:14:37.360
<v Speaker 2>not include the Mediterranean. It's found along the North American

0:14:37.400 --> 0:14:40.320
<v Speaker 2>Atlantic coast and in Asia. So if you look at

0:14:40.360 --> 0:14:43.400
<v Speaker 2>ancient ridings, you won't find anything about them. And say,

0:14:43.440 --> 0:14:47.400
<v Speaker 2>plenty of the elder or related European and Mediterranean sources

0:14:47.600 --> 0:14:51.720
<v Speaker 2>out of antiquity Plenty, for instance, does discuss a horse

0:14:51.760 --> 0:14:54.320
<v Speaker 2>crab that is said to be quite fast, as fast

0:14:54.320 --> 0:14:56.800
<v Speaker 2>as a horse, But this is not a horseshoe crab.

0:14:56.800 --> 0:15:00.760
<v Speaker 2>I think sometimes people assume that it's the horseshoe crab,

0:15:00.760 --> 0:15:03.720
<v Speaker 2>but it's not. Obviously, horseshoe crabs were known to the

0:15:03.720 --> 0:15:08.240
<v Speaker 2>peoples of ancient Asia and the Americas, and they certainly

0:15:08.480 --> 0:15:10.680
<v Speaker 2>did observe them and had their own names for them.

0:15:11.240 --> 0:15:15.080
<v Speaker 2>So the Algonquin people of North America knew them as sikinox.

0:15:15.800 --> 0:15:20.680
<v Speaker 2>The Japanese referred to them as kabutagani or helmet crabs.

0:15:20.840 --> 0:15:24.400
<v Speaker 2>Coming back to that, you know, and there seemed to

0:15:24.400 --> 0:15:28.680
<v Speaker 2>be some Chinese traditions linking the horseshoe crabs or the

0:15:28.760 --> 0:15:33.720
<v Speaker 2>I think they're called the whole to marital fidelity, apparently

0:15:33.760 --> 0:15:36.840
<v Speaker 2>based on sightings of them mating, if I'm to understanding correctly,

0:15:36.880 --> 0:15:38.640
<v Speaker 2>there's this idea that it's like you would always see

0:15:38.680 --> 0:15:42.360
<v Speaker 2>them together. They're two together, and they're together always, which

0:15:42.400 --> 0:15:44.040
<v Speaker 2>of course isn't actually the case, but you know, it's

0:15:44.040 --> 0:15:47.680
<v Speaker 2>based on observations that people had, and therefore it becomes

0:15:47.720 --> 0:15:50.680
<v Speaker 2>the symbol of sticking together for the long term.

0:15:50.920 --> 0:15:53.440
<v Speaker 3>Like nice to imagine that you're seeing the same ones

0:15:53.480 --> 0:15:54.480
<v Speaker 3>together over and over.

0:15:54.920 --> 0:15:57.720
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, yeah, you know, and it's you know, it's it's

0:15:58.000 --> 0:15:59.720
<v Speaker 2>essentially a made up story for us, but you know,

0:15:59.840 --> 0:16:04.960
<v Speaker 2>it's based on observations of the horseshoe crab. I also

0:16:05.000 --> 0:16:07.520
<v Speaker 2>found it kind of interesting to note that despite the

0:16:07.560 --> 0:16:11.600
<v Speaker 2>horseshoe crab being quite important in modern medicine for biomedical testing,

0:16:11.640 --> 0:16:16.400
<v Speaker 2>their blood contains an important clotting agent that reactsively to biotoxins.

0:16:17.320 --> 0:16:18.920
<v Speaker 2>I think this is something we talked about in an

0:16:18.960 --> 0:16:22.400
<v Speaker 2>old episode. But despite this, they apparently have little to

0:16:22.480 --> 0:16:26.000
<v Speaker 2>no presence in traditional Chinese medicine, So I found that

0:16:26.080 --> 0:16:29.160
<v Speaker 2>kind of kind of interesting. But yeah, coming back to

0:16:29.200 --> 0:16:32.040
<v Speaker 2>their design, you can if you look up pictures of

0:16:32.040 --> 0:16:35.840
<v Speaker 2>the horseshoe crab, they do look like weird little biotanks.

0:16:36.280 --> 0:16:39.040
<v Speaker 2>So I think it makes sense that someone might look

0:16:39.080 --> 0:16:42.320
<v Speaker 2>to nature and say, okay, who has the best battle armor?

0:16:42.720 --> 0:16:45.880
<v Speaker 2>What is the best sort of armored shell that could

0:16:45.880 --> 0:16:49.480
<v Speaker 2>exist over some sort of mechanism, And it makes sense

0:16:49.520 --> 0:16:51.560
<v Speaker 2>that you might consider the horseshoe crab an option.

0:16:52.080 --> 0:16:55.040
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, And I think this highlights something interesting, which is

0:16:55.080 --> 0:17:01.240
<v Speaker 3>that biomimicry is a real principle in engineering and design,

0:17:01.840 --> 0:17:07.439
<v Speaker 3>but there's kind of sophisticated biomemicry and then superficial biomemicry.

0:17:08.040 --> 0:17:10.440
<v Speaker 3>And there is a tendency often to just go by

0:17:10.480 --> 0:17:14.760
<v Speaker 3>what like, something that looks fearsome would therefore be a

0:17:14.760 --> 0:17:18.200
<v Speaker 3>good war machine. But that's not always the case, because

0:17:18.240 --> 0:17:21.119
<v Speaker 3>something that is useful, say at a certain scale with

0:17:21.200 --> 0:17:24.480
<v Speaker 3>the chemistry and you know, the ecology of a small

0:17:24.560 --> 0:17:28.320
<v Speaker 3>animal might be very effective at that scale for that animal,

0:17:28.400 --> 0:17:30.920
<v Speaker 3>but does not scale up or you know, doesn't work

0:17:30.920 --> 0:17:33.280
<v Speaker 3>with the kinds of materials we would use to make

0:17:33.320 --> 0:17:37.080
<v Speaker 3>a warship or you know, or conflicts with ways that

0:17:37.240 --> 0:17:39.800
<v Speaker 3>we would need to control a vehicle or something.

0:17:40.160 --> 0:17:43.439
<v Speaker 2>Yeah. Another area to highlight would be flight, where a

0:17:43.480 --> 0:17:45.280
<v Speaker 2>lot of you know, there are a lot of things

0:17:45.280 --> 0:17:50.160
<v Speaker 2>to learn about flight from looking at evolved biological methods

0:17:50.160 --> 0:17:52.960
<v Speaker 2>of flight in different animals, but there are also a

0:17:52.960 --> 0:17:55.600
<v Speaker 2>lot of just rough missteps and like, well, okay, these

0:17:55.640 --> 0:17:58.399
<v Speaker 2>look like wings, these feel like wings. Let's have a

0:17:58.480 --> 0:18:01.720
<v Speaker 2>run off the top of this barn and see.

0:18:01.000 --> 0:18:03.840
<v Speaker 3>Or actually, I think a great comparison here is a

0:18:03.880 --> 0:18:07.919
<v Speaker 3>lot of inventors assuming that technological flight would involve the

0:18:07.960 --> 0:18:11.080
<v Speaker 3>flapping of wings like we see in basic basically every

0:18:11.080 --> 0:18:14.440
<v Speaker 3>flying organism in birds and insects and stuff. But then

0:18:14.680 --> 0:18:17.560
<v Speaker 3>we learned that actually flapping is not a very efficient

0:18:17.600 --> 0:18:20.600
<v Speaker 3>way to you know, degenerate thrust and to for a

0:18:20.640 --> 0:18:23.280
<v Speaker 3>machine to fly. It's better to have other methods of

0:18:23.320 --> 0:18:25.520
<v Speaker 3>generating forward thrust and having fixed wings.

0:18:25.680 --> 0:18:28.320
<v Speaker 2>Yeah. A lot of the best examples of biomimicry that

0:18:28.600 --> 0:18:30.840
<v Speaker 2>we've discussed on the show before they come down to

0:18:31.160 --> 0:18:35.879
<v Speaker 2>subtle interactions, things that are happening at like a material level,

0:18:36.640 --> 0:18:41.160
<v Speaker 2>or things that are happening, you know, specific aerodynamic problems

0:18:41.160 --> 0:18:44.960
<v Speaker 2>that occur and so forth, as opposed to like bigger

0:18:45.400 --> 0:18:48.439
<v Speaker 2>situations like all right, if you're if you're gonna be

0:18:48.440 --> 0:18:50.920
<v Speaker 2>tough in the animal world, let's translate that into being

0:18:50.960 --> 0:18:52.040
<v Speaker 2>tough on the battle.

0:18:51.720 --> 0:19:03.720
<v Speaker 3>Thing, all right. So to come back to this letter,

0:19:04.200 --> 0:19:08.040
<v Speaker 3>CDK here says that an engine of war modeled on

0:19:08.080 --> 0:19:12.360
<v Speaker 3>the Horseshoe Crab could quote destroy any vessel now afloat.

0:19:12.560 --> 0:19:16.160
<v Speaker 3>How do they claim this is going to happen? Well,

0:19:16.280 --> 0:19:19.560
<v Speaker 3>the letter reads, quote this creature is provided with almost

0:19:19.600 --> 0:19:23.960
<v Speaker 3>everything requisite for a first class RAM ship. And to

0:19:24.040 --> 0:19:26.480
<v Speaker 3>this I would invite the attention of scientific men and

0:19:26.600 --> 0:19:30.400
<v Speaker 3>naval constructors. I will not enter into a scientific description

0:19:30.480 --> 0:19:32.840
<v Speaker 3>of the animal in detail, but I will simply state

0:19:32.880 --> 0:19:37.199
<v Speaker 3>its most prominent features for the purpose specified. And this

0:19:37.320 --> 0:19:39.880
<v Speaker 3>part did have me wondering for a second. Are they

0:19:39.880 --> 0:19:43.240
<v Speaker 3>saying that they won't give a detailed description for the

0:19:43.280 --> 0:19:46.400
<v Speaker 3>sake of brevity, or because like the enemy might be reading.

0:19:46.480 --> 0:19:49.199
<v Speaker 3>You know, if certain Crab facts reach the enemy, they

0:19:49.240 --> 0:19:53.360
<v Speaker 3>could make the King Crab warship. First, I think it's

0:19:53.440 --> 0:19:57.160
<v Speaker 3>the former, but I was tempted to think the latter.

0:19:57.440 --> 0:20:01.840
<v Speaker 2>Okay, well, I'm excited to find out how something shaped

0:20:01.880 --> 0:20:03.960
<v Speaker 2>like a large horseshoe crab is going to ram things.

0:20:04.600 --> 0:20:07.920
<v Speaker 3>Well, let's read the rest of the letter. CDK goes

0:20:07.920 --> 0:20:11.880
<v Speaker 3>on quote in shape, it is like a turtle, covered

0:20:11.880 --> 0:20:14.679
<v Speaker 3>with a thick shell or armor, and armed with a

0:20:14.720 --> 0:20:19.520
<v Speaker 3>sharp stylet or prow. Now that's a little confusing because

0:20:20.600 --> 0:20:22.800
<v Speaker 3>maybe I don't know my naval terminology right, but I

0:20:22.800 --> 0:20:25.679
<v Speaker 3>would think prow usually goes at the front of a ship.

0:20:26.359 --> 0:20:29.199
<v Speaker 3>And the style it I think would be referring to

0:20:29.240 --> 0:20:30.919
<v Speaker 3>the telson, right, which is the tail.

0:20:31.320 --> 0:20:34.040
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, yeah, I mean that's the sharp part of the

0:20:34.880 --> 0:20:38.040
<v Speaker 2>horseshoe crab. It's hard, and you know, I can't imagine

0:20:38.080 --> 0:20:42.160
<v Speaker 2>it ramming anything by going backwards. And I also can't

0:20:42.160 --> 0:20:46.080
<v Speaker 2>imagine it really being a ramming vessel if it's moving forward.

0:20:46.800 --> 0:20:50.600
<v Speaker 3>Maybe we're not understanding something about this. Maybe something is

0:20:50.600 --> 0:20:54.320
<v Speaker 3>getting lost in the description here. But CDK goes on quote,

0:20:54.440 --> 0:20:57.400
<v Speaker 3>the back of it is brought down wedge shape, which

0:20:57.440 --> 0:21:00.560
<v Speaker 3>will enable it to have considerable speed through the wall.

0:21:00.720 --> 0:21:04.160
<v Speaker 3>Its propelling power is placed underneath so that its feet

0:21:04.320 --> 0:21:07.800
<v Speaker 3>or paddles are hid and are not liable to be injured.

0:21:08.320 --> 0:21:11.479
<v Speaker 3>It has apparatus to lower and raise itself in the

0:21:11.480 --> 0:21:14.480
<v Speaker 3>water around the bow, and it is armed with a

0:21:14.560 --> 0:21:17.240
<v Speaker 3>row of smaller spikes which would be sure to strike

0:21:17.320 --> 0:21:20.720
<v Speaker 3>anything met in its path through the water. A vessel

0:21:20.800 --> 0:21:24.679
<v Speaker 3>constructed to contain in itself the above mentioned principles, with

0:21:24.760 --> 0:21:28.080
<v Speaker 3>the addition of a telescopic smoke stack and pilot house,

0:21:28.320 --> 0:21:32.800
<v Speaker 3>and perhaps a revolving prow, would be really formidable. Manned

0:21:32.800 --> 0:21:36.000
<v Speaker 3>with a pilot engineer and fireman, it could attack any

0:21:36.080 --> 0:21:40.119
<v Speaker 3>vessel with impunity, being submerged when in action and showing

0:21:40.160 --> 0:21:43.040
<v Speaker 3>nothing but the smoke stack. It could approach a vessel

0:21:43.080 --> 0:21:46.399
<v Speaker 3>without being seen. With its great speed and weight. It

0:21:46.440 --> 0:21:49.080
<v Speaker 3>could strike a blow with the force of a dozen

0:21:49.320 --> 0:21:53.040
<v Speaker 3>swamp angels. A swamp angel here referring to a type

0:21:53.040 --> 0:21:56.640
<v Speaker 3>of heavy artillery that was used in the bombardment of Charleston.

0:21:56.880 --> 0:22:01.480
<v Speaker 2>Okay, I was imagining something entirely different, but yeah, thing, yeah, yeah,

0:22:01.560 --> 0:22:04.439
<v Speaker 2>we're kind of like, yeah, some swamp angels are just

0:22:04.560 --> 0:22:07.720
<v Speaker 2>like literal angels from the swamp covered and some sort

0:22:07.760 --> 0:22:09.200
<v Speaker 2>of Spanish moss.

0:22:09.160 --> 0:22:13.920
<v Speaker 3>Mermaids or sirens of the swamp with some algae. Anyway,

0:22:14.240 --> 0:22:17.879
<v Speaker 3>CDK says, thus utterly demolishing its opponent. If attacked and

0:22:17.920 --> 0:22:21.520
<v Speaker 3>surrounded by boats, it could rise to the surface, spin around,

0:22:21.600 --> 0:22:25.680
<v Speaker 3>and scatter its assailants like chips. In fact, under almost

0:22:25.680 --> 0:22:29.240
<v Speaker 3>any circumstances, I can see in a monster king crab

0:22:29.440 --> 0:22:33.800
<v Speaker 3>admirable means for protection and defense. Signed CDK.

0:22:34.040 --> 0:22:38.360
<v Speaker 2>Frankford, Pa, Wow, Well, I love the kaiju sized day

0:22:38.440 --> 0:22:42.000
<v Speaker 2>dreaming involved in this scenario, and I don't know some

0:22:42.080 --> 0:22:45.040
<v Speaker 2>of it, I can, I can get. I mean, certainly

0:22:45.160 --> 0:22:47.120
<v Speaker 2>you can admit that if all of these things were

0:22:47.160 --> 0:22:50.760
<v Speaker 2>possible on a machine level, it could be effective. And

0:22:51.359 --> 0:22:54.000
<v Speaker 2>it is you know, he observes that. Okay, you know,

0:22:54.200 --> 0:22:58.400
<v Speaker 2>essentially the legs and underbelly the mechanisms propelling the horseshoe

0:22:58.400 --> 0:23:00.760
<v Speaker 2>crab are protected by the shell. True, And so I

0:23:00.760 --> 0:23:04.879
<v Speaker 2>guess you could you could make some sort of an

0:23:05.000 --> 0:23:07.639
<v Speaker 2>argument for some sort of a big shell like that

0:23:07.800 --> 0:23:11.320
<v Speaker 2>covering the machinery that propels a ship through the water.

0:23:11.400 --> 0:23:11.800
<v Speaker 2>I don't know.

0:23:12.359 --> 0:23:15.680
<v Speaker 3>Well, it kind of makes me wonder if CDK had

0:23:15.720 --> 0:23:19.560
<v Speaker 3>been reading a lot about ancient Mediterranean combat with the

0:23:19.600 --> 0:23:22.800
<v Speaker 3>try rems, which did function, and there were still ramming

0:23:22.840 --> 0:23:25.240
<v Speaker 3>attacks in naval tactics at the time of the Civil War.

0:23:25.280 --> 0:23:28.320
<v Speaker 3>We can talk about that in it. But you know,

0:23:28.359 --> 0:23:30.560
<v Speaker 3>the age of the Tryrem, you would have very much

0:23:30.640 --> 0:23:34.240
<v Speaker 3>a ramming focused naval combat where you know, a ship

0:23:34.280 --> 0:23:37.080
<v Speaker 3>is trying to build up speed to ram an opponent

0:23:37.200 --> 0:23:41.199
<v Speaker 3>ship broadside. But then another type of attack that you

0:23:41.240 --> 0:23:44.040
<v Speaker 3>would get with the Tryrem would be these ships trying

0:23:44.080 --> 0:23:46.880
<v Speaker 3>to come up against another ship and shear off its

0:23:46.960 --> 0:23:49.919
<v Speaker 3>ores to you know, make it to prevent it from moving.

0:23:51.320 --> 0:23:53.960
<v Speaker 3>So so yeah, maybe that makes me think maybe he's

0:23:54.000 --> 0:23:55.960
<v Speaker 3>got similar things in mind, like you got to protect

0:23:56.080 --> 0:23:59.040
<v Speaker 3>the oars or the legs he specifies can be either one.

0:24:00.160 --> 0:24:02.800
<v Speaker 3>The ship could have oars or legs. What how would

0:24:02.800 --> 0:24:05.920
<v Speaker 3>it have legs? I'm a little a little confused confused there,

0:24:05.960 --> 0:24:09.440
<v Speaker 3>maybe like you know, many poles sticking out the bottom

0:24:09.520 --> 0:24:11.119
<v Speaker 3>like a pole barge that goes along.

0:24:11.440 --> 0:24:14.520
<v Speaker 2>Yeah. Now it is interesting to think though that if

0:24:14.520 --> 0:24:19.280
<v Speaker 2>he is invoking, you know, the ideas of the Trireem

0:24:19.280 --> 0:24:22.560
<v Speaker 2>and so forth, he would be reproducing a pattern we

0:24:22.600 --> 0:24:26.119
<v Speaker 2>see quite a lot in human thought, and that is

0:24:26.480 --> 0:24:30.320
<v Speaker 2>when we try to imagine the future of warfare, we

0:24:30.400 --> 0:24:34.800
<v Speaker 2>often extrapolate things off of the past warfare and not

0:24:34.880 --> 0:24:39.640
<v Speaker 2>really on the present nature of warfare. So he would

0:24:39.680 --> 0:24:40.800
<v Speaker 2>not be alone in making that air.

0:24:41.400 --> 0:24:44.040
<v Speaker 3>So we'll come back to the specific naval details. But

0:24:44.560 --> 0:24:46.359
<v Speaker 3>I do want to, of course mention that despite the

0:24:46.359 --> 0:24:49.800
<v Speaker 3>compelling pitch, this was never built. The King Crab Warship

0:24:50.080 --> 0:24:53.240
<v Speaker 3>was never realized. I went looking to see if I

0:24:53.280 --> 0:24:56.800
<v Speaker 3>could find anything else about this letter, like any you know,

0:24:56.960 --> 0:24:59.879
<v Speaker 3>notice from historians or attempts to put it in context.

0:25:00.200 --> 0:25:03.560
<v Speaker 3>But I really couldn't find anything like that. So I

0:25:03.600 --> 0:25:08.720
<v Speaker 3>think the King Crab proposal remains a just weird, barely noticed,

0:25:08.760 --> 0:25:12.399
<v Speaker 3>obscure little curiosity. It's just a strange little letter hanging

0:25:12.400 --> 0:25:15.280
<v Speaker 3>out there in history that never really went anywhere.

0:25:15.480 --> 0:25:17.600
<v Speaker 2>Oh it's kind of a shame because you can really

0:25:17.920 --> 0:25:21.760
<v Speaker 2>catch cdk's excitement here, and you know, I would have

0:25:21.760 --> 0:25:23.640
<v Speaker 2>hoped he would at least found one other human out

0:25:23.680 --> 0:25:26.360
<v Speaker 2>there in the world that he could share this with.

0:25:26.760 --> 0:25:30.840
<v Speaker 3>I really suspect CDK was talking about this a lot. Yeah,

0:25:30.880 --> 0:25:32.919
<v Speaker 3>I think it came up. I think it came up

0:25:32.960 --> 0:25:34.560
<v Speaker 3>at dinner. I think it came up at work.

0:25:34.880 --> 0:25:35.080
<v Speaker 2>Yeah.

0:25:35.119 --> 0:25:36.480
<v Speaker 3>I think there was a lot of this talk.

0:25:36.520 --> 0:25:38.520
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, there was probably a significant other that was like,

0:25:38.560 --> 0:25:41.760
<v Speaker 2>you know, you should write to Scientific American about this

0:25:41.880 --> 0:25:44.680
<v Speaker 2>insteads just continuing to tell me about it. I think

0:25:44.720 --> 0:25:46.520
<v Speaker 2>someone there might be excited to hear from you.

0:25:46.920 --> 0:25:49.879
<v Speaker 3>But this actually leads me to the broader context I

0:25:49.920 --> 0:25:52.679
<v Speaker 3>wanted to put this in. So I was reading, I

0:25:52.720 --> 0:25:54.520
<v Speaker 3>was trying to find context for this letter, and like

0:25:54.520 --> 0:25:57.639
<v Speaker 3>I said, didn't really find anything. But I did, through

0:25:57.720 --> 0:26:01.600
<v Speaker 3>that quest, end up reading about an interesting phenomenon taking

0:26:01.640 --> 0:26:04.679
<v Speaker 3>place during the Civil War, of which this seems to

0:26:04.720 --> 0:26:09.360
<v Speaker 3>be one example, which was a kind of frenzied period

0:26:09.640 --> 0:26:14.200
<v Speaker 3>of amateur inventors scrambling to talk to anyone who would

0:26:14.200 --> 0:26:17.920
<v Speaker 3>listen about their designs for stupendous machines that would win

0:26:17.960 --> 0:26:22.080
<v Speaker 3>the war. So one source that was really useful here

0:26:22.240 --> 0:26:24.719
<v Speaker 3>is a history book that I found online. You can

0:26:24.760 --> 0:26:27.640
<v Speaker 3>read the full text online called Lincoln and the Tools

0:26:27.680 --> 0:26:31.400
<v Speaker 3>of War, originally published in nineteen fifty six by University

0:26:31.440 --> 0:26:35.040
<v Speaker 3>of Illinois Press by the Pulitzer Prize winning American historian

0:26:35.240 --> 0:26:38.640
<v Speaker 3>Robert V. Bruce. Now I haven't read the whole book,

0:26:38.640 --> 0:26:41.159
<v Speaker 3>but I read a couple of chapters that discussed the

0:26:41.320 --> 0:26:45.879
<v Speaker 3>sort of patent fever that accompanied Lincoln's presidency and the

0:26:45.920 --> 0:26:50.840
<v Speaker 3>outbreak of the US Civil War, where many aspiring amateur

0:26:50.880 --> 0:26:55.320
<v Speaker 3>inventors did not seem to be aware of the proper

0:26:55.440 --> 0:26:59.040
<v Speaker 3>channels to get their designs noticed, such as contacting the

0:26:59.520 --> 0:27:03.280
<v Speaker 3>Army depart Department of Ordinance. So they would just try

0:27:03.320 --> 0:27:06.840
<v Speaker 3>to get in touch directly with the President. And the

0:27:06.960 --> 0:27:10.680
<v Speaker 3>strange thing is, in a lot of cases, Lincoln would

0:27:10.720 --> 0:27:15.440
<v Speaker 3>hear them out. Bruce writes, quote, scarcely had parade torches

0:27:15.480 --> 0:27:19.280
<v Speaker 3>gutted out, campaign songs died away, and votes been counted

0:27:19.320 --> 0:27:22.240
<v Speaker 3>in the election which made Abraham Lincoln sixteenth President of

0:27:22.320 --> 0:27:26.680
<v Speaker 3>the United States. When inventors began writing the successful candidate,

0:27:27.640 --> 0:27:31.920
<v Speaker 3>and he gives an example of one such early letter, quote,

0:27:32.200 --> 0:27:34.920
<v Speaker 3>it looks like war. I have invented a machine which

0:27:34.920 --> 0:27:38.720
<v Speaker 3>will fire five hundred bullets simultaneously. Write me if you

0:27:38.760 --> 0:27:41.600
<v Speaker 3>wish me to explain it to you. And then Bruce

0:27:41.640 --> 0:27:45.040
<v Speaker 3>adds that Lincoln jotted a note for his secretary, John

0:27:45.080 --> 0:27:47.400
<v Speaker 3>Nikolay across the top of this letter which just said,

0:27:47.520 --> 0:27:52.280
<v Speaker 3>need not answer this. But Bruce has a whole chapter

0:27:52.359 --> 0:27:55.600
<v Speaker 3>in this book called Patent Nonsense, which is focused on

0:27:55.640 --> 0:28:00.960
<v Speaker 3>the sheer volume of invention proposals, on what Bruce calls

0:28:01.040 --> 0:28:06.040
<v Speaker 3>cranks and dreamers that Lincoln waded through during and before

0:28:06.080 --> 0:28:09.520
<v Speaker 3>the war. I'll just mention a few examples. There was

0:28:09.600 --> 0:28:13.399
<v Speaker 3>a general craze at this time from multiple sources and

0:28:13.440 --> 0:28:18.000
<v Speaker 3>with different designs for steam powered guns as opposed to

0:28:18.160 --> 0:28:22.199
<v Speaker 3>gunpowder powdered guns. Sounds like an interesting idea, but the

0:28:22.240 --> 0:28:25.679
<v Speaker 3>problem was that they were usually not an improvement on

0:28:25.760 --> 0:28:29.159
<v Speaker 3>existing technology. I think it was a case of a

0:28:29.160 --> 0:28:32.439
<v Speaker 3>solution in search of a problem here, where like you know,

0:28:32.480 --> 0:28:35.520
<v Speaker 3>you had all this like great new innovations in steam

0:28:35.520 --> 0:28:38.760
<v Speaker 3>powered machinery, and people are thinking, we can make this

0:28:38.920 --> 0:28:42.360
<v Speaker 3>make a better gun. But from what I was reading,

0:28:42.520 --> 0:28:45.920
<v Speaker 3>the models that were actually built and tested were unreliable

0:28:46.080 --> 0:28:50.200
<v Speaker 3>and produced less muzzle velocity than gunpowder. So actually gunpowder

0:28:50.240 --> 0:28:52.960
<v Speaker 3>was already better. It was just people trying to, I think,

0:28:53.160 --> 0:28:55.600
<v Speaker 3>take one thing they knew and combine it with a

0:28:55.720 --> 0:28:57.520
<v Speaker 3>use case where it didn't actually work.

0:28:57.880 --> 0:29:01.440
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, like we're real steampunk inner here though, Well, yes's

0:29:01.440 --> 0:29:02.800
<v Speaker 2>the supply steam to everything.

0:29:03.560 --> 0:29:07.280
<v Speaker 3>Another thing that inventors were going wild for at the

0:29:07.320 --> 0:29:10.200
<v Speaker 3>time of the Civil War was the double cannon or

0:29:10.240 --> 0:29:13.240
<v Speaker 3>the fork This what Bruce calls it is the quote

0:29:13.640 --> 0:29:16.080
<v Speaker 3>forked cannon firing chain shot.

0:29:17.080 --> 0:29:17.280
<v Speaker 2>Rob.

0:29:17.320 --> 0:29:19.400
<v Speaker 3>I think this has somehow come up on the show before,

0:29:19.440 --> 0:29:21.320
<v Speaker 3>but I don't remember what episode that was.

0:29:22.200 --> 0:29:24.680
<v Speaker 2>Well, let's keep going and maybe it'll maybe I'll remember.

0:29:25.080 --> 0:29:29.239
<v Speaker 3>This was an extremely popular suggestion, with seemingly dozens of

0:29:29.240 --> 0:29:32.760
<v Speaker 3>different inventors all writing to Lincoln about this fearful design,

0:29:32.920 --> 0:29:35.320
<v Speaker 3>imagining that they were each the first to think of it.

0:29:36.080 --> 0:29:38.600
<v Speaker 3>To summarize the basic idea, I'll read from Bruce here

0:29:38.760 --> 0:29:43.440
<v Speaker 3>quote from two diverging cannon joined at the breach were

0:29:43.480 --> 0:29:47.640
<v Speaker 3>to be fired two projectiles linked by a chain. As

0:29:47.680 --> 0:29:50.880
<v Speaker 3>the two shots spread apart, the chain between them was

0:29:50.920 --> 0:29:54.400
<v Speaker 3>supposed to snap taut and cut a terrible swathe through

0:29:54.400 --> 0:29:58.680
<v Speaker 3>the rebel ranks. One guy from Connecticut wrote Lincoln not once,

0:29:58.840 --> 0:30:02.200
<v Speaker 3>not twice, but five times about the double cannon idea.

0:30:02.880 --> 0:30:05.120
<v Speaker 3>But this is a great example of you know, when

0:30:05.200 --> 0:30:09.720
<v Speaker 3>everybody is having the same great idea and nobody's actually

0:30:09.840 --> 0:30:13.200
<v Speaker 3>using it, there's usually a good reason. And the reason

0:30:13.240 --> 0:30:16.000
<v Speaker 3>in this case is it had been tried multiple times

0:30:16.040 --> 0:30:19.280
<v Speaker 3>in the past. It did not usually work as intended,

0:30:19.360 --> 0:30:22.400
<v Speaker 3>in part because you couldn't in part because you couldn't

0:30:22.400 --> 0:30:25.800
<v Speaker 3>get the two cannons to fire at exactly the same

0:30:25.880 --> 0:30:29.880
<v Speaker 3>time or with the same initial velocity, so you know

0:30:29.920 --> 0:30:31.840
<v Speaker 3>it would go you would go off target or you

0:30:31.840 --> 0:30:37.040
<v Speaker 3>would get kind of malfunctions. The Confederates actually built one

0:30:37.080 --> 0:30:40.080
<v Speaker 3>of these and tested it in Athens, Georgia, and I've

0:30:40.080 --> 0:30:43.160
<v Speaker 3>read there are competing accounts of what happened here. Bruce

0:30:43.240 --> 0:30:45.840
<v Speaker 3>mentions this story that when they fired it, one of

0:30:45.880 --> 0:30:48.640
<v Speaker 3>the guns fired before the other one, and the chain

0:30:48.680 --> 0:30:51.600
<v Speaker 3>whipped back around the unfired barrel and killed most of

0:30:51.640 --> 0:30:54.320
<v Speaker 3>the artillery crew. From what I was reading that that

0:30:54.440 --> 0:30:57.600
<v Speaker 3>is a I think that is now the less subscribed

0:30:57.680 --> 0:31:00.640
<v Speaker 3>to account of what actually happened. A more subscribe to

0:31:00.680 --> 0:31:05.320
<v Speaker 3>account that I was reading instead says that both barrels fired,

0:31:05.480 --> 0:31:09.000
<v Speaker 3>but the contraption could not be aimed effectively and the

0:31:09.120 --> 0:31:12.920
<v Speaker 3>chain snapped, so both balls and chain flew off target,

0:31:13.320 --> 0:31:16.200
<v Speaker 3>accidentally smashing a chimney and killing a cow in a

0:31:16.240 --> 0:31:17.040
<v Speaker 3>nearby field.

0:31:17.800 --> 0:31:22.240
<v Speaker 2>Hmm. Wow. It's certainly a brutal idea for a weapon,

0:31:22.360 --> 0:31:25.640
<v Speaker 2>and I cannot help but wonder how much of it

0:31:25.680 --> 0:31:29.640
<v Speaker 2>is thinking about what the technology can do to improve

0:31:29.760 --> 0:31:32.080
<v Speaker 2>the nature of warfare, and how much of it is

0:31:32.120 --> 0:31:36.719
<v Speaker 2>just kind of like almost a reflection on just how

0:31:37.400 --> 0:31:40.680
<v Speaker 2>nasty and brutal modern warfare had become, and just sort

0:31:40.680 --> 0:31:43.600
<v Speaker 2>of like turning that back on technology and maybe in

0:31:43.640 --> 0:31:46.160
<v Speaker 2>an almost subconscious way, thinking well, how could what else

0:31:46.160 --> 0:31:48.480
<v Speaker 2>can we do in the spirit of how awful warfare

0:31:48.640 --> 0:31:49.680
<v Speaker 2>is at this present moment.

0:31:50.000 --> 0:31:52.320
<v Speaker 3>This one does feel to me less like the steam

0:31:52.360 --> 0:31:56.960
<v Speaker 3>powered gun idea. Feels like somebody is somewhat familiar with

0:31:57.040 --> 0:31:59.920
<v Speaker 3>steam technology and steam mechanisms and they're just trying to

0:32:00.000 --> 0:32:02.120
<v Speaker 3>apply it to a different domain. They're like, oh, now

0:32:02.160 --> 0:32:04.480
<v Speaker 3>there's a need for new war technology. Can we apply

0:32:04.640 --> 0:32:09.560
<v Speaker 3>steam to that? Yeah, this one, the double cannon, feels

0:32:09.640 --> 0:32:13.000
<v Speaker 3>more like the way people would dream up like horror

0:32:13.040 --> 0:32:15.320
<v Speaker 3>movie scripts, like you know, like you're writing, you know,

0:32:15.760 --> 0:32:19.080
<v Speaker 3>saw scripts, trying to think up new grizzly ideas of

0:32:19.120 --> 0:32:20.640
<v Speaker 3>things that could happen to people.

0:32:20.960 --> 0:32:22.000
<v Speaker 2>Yeah. Yeah.

0:32:22.040 --> 0:32:25.720
<v Speaker 3>One last example here from the dreamers category, Lincoln got

0:32:25.760 --> 0:32:29.280
<v Speaker 3>a bunch of letters from a machinist named Edward Tippett

0:32:29.480 --> 0:32:32.440
<v Speaker 3>who kept writing to him about designs for a mighty

0:32:32.680 --> 0:32:36.520
<v Speaker 3>battle balloon, which we laugh at, but that will come

0:32:36.560 --> 0:32:39.800
<v Speaker 3>back to that. That's actually not a bad idea in principle,

0:32:39.840 --> 0:32:43.280
<v Speaker 3>and Lincoln did use a form of balloons.

0:32:42.800 --> 0:32:45.280
<v Speaker 2>But nobody ever called them battle balloons. No.

0:32:45.800 --> 0:32:49.040
<v Speaker 3>The letters from this guy also contained a lot of

0:32:49.160 --> 0:32:53.960
<v Speaker 3>theological warnings and obscure references to the Bible. So just

0:32:54.000 --> 0:32:56.720
<v Speaker 3>some quotes from his letters. You must have my balloon

0:32:56.800 --> 0:32:59.440
<v Speaker 3>to put down all four and foes. I again warn

0:32:59.520 --> 0:33:02.680
<v Speaker 3>you against secret enemies. Watch well, and you will find

0:33:02.760 --> 0:33:07.000
<v Speaker 3>the golden wedge and the Achan too. Bruce thinks the

0:33:07.080 --> 0:33:09.520
<v Speaker 3>Achen here is a reference to a story in Joshua

0:33:09.600 --> 0:33:13.400
<v Speaker 3>chapter seven, where an Israelite named Achan is punished for

0:33:13.480 --> 0:33:16.920
<v Speaker 3>stealing spoils of war after the fall of Jericho. I

0:33:16.960 --> 0:33:19.280
<v Speaker 3>couldn't piece together all of the elements of this, but

0:33:19.680 --> 0:33:23.520
<v Speaker 3>finally later this letter says, I say, you cannot conquer

0:33:23.560 --> 0:33:29.800
<v Speaker 3>without my navigating balloon. That said. In this book, Bruce

0:33:29.840 --> 0:33:34.160
<v Speaker 3>describes how Lincoln had a real appetite for hearing from inventors.

0:33:34.240 --> 0:33:37.000
<v Speaker 3>Like it wasn't just like all these people are bombarding

0:33:37.040 --> 0:33:40.880
<v Speaker 3>him with ideas and annoying him. Even though a lot

0:33:40.880 --> 0:33:43.680
<v Speaker 3>of these ideas turned out to be useless or impractical,

0:33:43.920 --> 0:33:47.480
<v Speaker 3>some of them are just outright crankery. Lincoln kept hearing

0:33:47.520 --> 0:33:50.640
<v Speaker 3>inventors out, he would read their letters, he would invite

0:33:50.640 --> 0:33:53.840
<v Speaker 3>them to the White House to give demonstrations, and Bruce

0:33:53.880 --> 0:33:58.040
<v Speaker 3>gives several reasons for this. One is Lincoln's firm belief

0:33:58.080 --> 0:34:03.120
<v Speaker 3>that technological advantage could help win the war, so he

0:34:03.200 --> 0:34:07.280
<v Speaker 3>thought that new inventions would be critical for overall victory.

0:34:08.520 --> 0:34:12.880
<v Speaker 3>The second thing is Lincoln's personal interest in all things mechanical.

0:34:12.960 --> 0:34:15.040
<v Speaker 3>He was a bit of an engineering nerd, and in

0:34:15.080 --> 0:34:18.439
<v Speaker 3>fact was the only US president to actually have taken

0:34:18.480 --> 0:34:22.960
<v Speaker 3>out a patent himself. He patented a device that was

0:34:23.040 --> 0:34:26.759
<v Speaker 3>used to lift riverboats over shoals and sandbars, like had

0:34:26.760 --> 0:34:29.840
<v Speaker 3>these inflatable bellows on the side, so if your riverboat

0:34:29.880 --> 0:34:32.040
<v Speaker 3>runs in the shallows, you can inflate the bellows and

0:34:32.040 --> 0:34:37.880
<v Speaker 3>get over them. And then also there's something that kind

0:34:37.920 --> 0:34:40.160
<v Speaker 3>of comes through in this chapter, which is Lincoln having

0:34:40.200 --> 0:34:44.239
<v Speaker 3>a bit of a tolerance and sometimes even an affectionate

0:34:44.440 --> 0:34:47.480
<v Speaker 3>amusement at pitches that turned out to be dead end

0:34:47.560 --> 0:34:51.080
<v Speaker 3>fantasies I would say, like the King Crab, though there

0:34:51.120 --> 0:34:54.120
<v Speaker 3>is no evidence Lincoln ever encountered or considered the King

0:34:54.200 --> 0:34:57.880
<v Speaker 3>Crab warship idea. But I do want to emphasize that

0:34:58.880 --> 0:35:03.400
<v Speaker 3>Lincoln's tolerance dealing with nonsense from amateur inventors was not

0:35:03.719 --> 0:35:05.960
<v Speaker 3>just because he found it amusing. There's a bit of

0:35:06.000 --> 0:35:09.360
<v Speaker 3>amusement you can read between the lines here, But the

0:35:09.400 --> 0:35:11.799
<v Speaker 3>main thrust, at least according to Bruce, is that he

0:35:11.880 --> 0:35:14.480
<v Speaker 3>was desperate to win the war as fast as possible

0:35:14.560 --> 0:35:18.319
<v Speaker 3>and thought, to some degree correctly, that new inventions would

0:35:18.320 --> 0:35:21.239
<v Speaker 3>bring about that end, and there are some examples where

0:35:21.239 --> 0:35:25.480
<v Speaker 3>that proved correct. One commonly cited example is the Spencer

0:35:25.560 --> 0:35:28.920
<v Speaker 3>repeating rifle, which is a seven shot lever action rifle

0:35:29.000 --> 0:35:32.120
<v Speaker 3>that Lincoln tried out at the White House after meeting

0:35:32.160 --> 0:35:36.200
<v Speaker 3>its inventor, Christopher Spencer, in eighteen sixty three. Lincoln was

0:35:36.320 --> 0:35:39.520
<v Speaker 3>very impressed, and he advocated its use by the Union Army,

0:35:39.840 --> 0:35:44.360
<v Speaker 3>even overruling some initial resistance from the Department of Ordnance leadership,

0:35:44.760 --> 0:35:49.000
<v Speaker 3>and it is thought by some historians that this rifle

0:35:49.080 --> 0:35:52.120
<v Speaker 3>made a big difference. It significantly increased the firing rate

0:35:52.160 --> 0:35:55.320
<v Speaker 3>of the Union cavalry and gave them a distinct advantage

0:35:55.320 --> 0:35:58.799
<v Speaker 3>on the battlefield. Another example, I told you I'd come

0:35:58.800 --> 0:36:02.480
<v Speaker 3>back to balloons, despite the fact that Tippetts you cannot

0:36:02.520 --> 0:36:06.560
<v Speaker 3>conquer without my balloon. Pitch went nowhere. Lincoln actually did

0:36:06.760 --> 0:36:10.080
<v Speaker 3>personally push for the Union to use hot air balloons

0:36:10.160 --> 0:36:14.040
<v Speaker 3>for aerial reconnaissance, and this was after he was impressed

0:36:14.080 --> 0:36:17.520
<v Speaker 3>by a demonstration from an inventor and aeronaut named Thaddeus

0:36:17.640 --> 0:36:21.279
<v Speaker 3>Lowe in eighteen sixty one, during at least one of

0:36:21.320 --> 0:36:23.160
<v Speaker 3>these demonstrations. I don't know how many there were, There

0:36:23.239 --> 0:36:25.760
<v Speaker 3>might have just been one, but at one of these demonstrations,

0:36:26.080 --> 0:36:30.560
<v Speaker 3>Lowe famously sent Lincoln a telegraph via wire from hundreds

0:36:30.560 --> 0:36:33.239
<v Speaker 3>of feet up in the air describing what he could

0:36:33.280 --> 0:36:35.799
<v Speaker 3>see from above. You can easily imagine how that would

0:36:35.840 --> 0:36:40.080
<v Speaker 3>be incredibly important in gathering intelligence at the time.

0:36:40.400 --> 0:36:44.319
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, And of course airships and balloons would continue to

0:36:44.360 --> 0:36:47.800
<v Speaker 2>be very important in warfare, you know, over the decades

0:36:47.840 --> 0:36:48.160
<v Speaker 2>to come.

0:36:48.480 --> 0:36:51.440
<v Speaker 3>Yeah. Absolutely, So how does this come back to the

0:36:51.560 --> 0:36:55.400
<v Speaker 3>King Crab and naval designs? Well, As I said, the

0:36:55.560 --> 0:36:59.120
<v Speaker 3>exact design of the King Crab warship was never used,

0:36:59.680 --> 0:37:04.040
<v Speaker 3>but the basic idea of a submersible or semi submersible

0:37:04.080 --> 0:37:08.200
<v Speaker 3>ship that would attack by ramming was actually used in

0:37:08.239 --> 0:37:10.919
<v Speaker 3>the US Civil War. Maybe a lot of people don't

0:37:10.960 --> 0:37:15.240
<v Speaker 3>know this, but there were several basically submarines or semi

0:37:15.239 --> 0:37:19.000
<v Speaker 3>submersible ships. Several of these were used by the Confederacy.

0:37:19.080 --> 0:37:22.640
<v Speaker 3>Though there ramming attack was not like the trirems of

0:37:22.680 --> 0:37:26.080
<v Speaker 3>the ancient Mediterranean, which would again those would ram each

0:37:26.120 --> 0:37:28.080
<v Speaker 3>other broadside with a kind with an you know, a

0:37:28.160 --> 0:37:30.960
<v Speaker 3>kind of thing sticking out of the front of the

0:37:31.000 --> 0:37:35.360
<v Speaker 3>ship I think usually called a ram. The ramming attacks

0:37:35.400 --> 0:37:39.359
<v Speaker 3>of Civil War submersibles involved hitting enemy vessels with a

0:37:39.400 --> 0:37:42.840
<v Speaker 3>mounted torpedo. So imagine it's just a big spike with

0:37:42.960 --> 0:37:45.239
<v Speaker 3>explosives on the end. I think this is sometimes called

0:37:45.239 --> 0:37:46.240
<v Speaker 3>a torpedo spar.

0:37:47.040 --> 0:37:49.560
<v Speaker 2>Yeah. And also this is just this is the age

0:37:49.600 --> 0:37:52.920
<v Speaker 2>of the ironclad ships as well, so right, yeah, you

0:37:52.920 --> 0:37:54.640
<v Speaker 2>know very much. The idea of what if a ship

0:37:54.680 --> 0:37:57.200
<v Speaker 2>had an exoskeleton, how effective would that be?

0:37:57.520 --> 0:38:01.440
<v Speaker 3>Yeah? Very I mean again, you can imagine to what

0:38:01.600 --> 0:38:04.520
<v Speaker 3>extent that was or was not inspired by crabs or

0:38:04.600 --> 0:38:07.959
<v Speaker 3>Arthur buds generally, I don't know, but yeah, plating putting

0:38:08.040 --> 0:38:11.360
<v Speaker 3>iron plating around a ship that that was also not

0:38:11.800 --> 0:38:15.000
<v Speaker 3>just submersibles, but you know, but top floating ships. That

0:38:15.080 --> 0:38:17.680
<v Speaker 3>was used in the Civil War as well. The Union

0:38:17.760 --> 0:38:22.200
<v Speaker 3>Army actually did develop some submersible technology, so they developed

0:38:22.239 --> 0:38:26.759
<v Speaker 3>a forty seven foot long iron submersible with an animal name.

0:38:26.840 --> 0:38:29.160
<v Speaker 3>Though it was not called the King Crab, it was

0:38:29.200 --> 0:38:33.560
<v Speaker 3>called the USS Alligator. Launched in eighteen sixty two, It

0:38:33.640 --> 0:38:36.280
<v Speaker 3>was based on an earlier design by a French inventor

0:38:36.360 --> 0:38:40.040
<v Speaker 3>named Brutus de Villeroi, and in its final form, the

0:38:40.080 --> 0:38:44.120
<v Speaker 3>Alligator was powered by a small propeller at the stern,

0:38:44.200 --> 0:38:47.840
<v Speaker 3>not by legs or ores like the King Crab describes.

0:38:49.080 --> 0:38:53.520
<v Speaker 3>But though actually an earlier version of the USS Alligator

0:38:53.520 --> 0:38:57.000
<v Speaker 3>design did have oars, it was powered by ores operated

0:38:57.000 --> 0:38:59.720
<v Speaker 3>by the crew from inside. But it turns out ores

0:38:59.719 --> 0:39:03.239
<v Speaker 3>don't worked very well for underwater vessels. I mean, they

0:39:03.239 --> 0:39:06.000
<v Speaker 3>can kind of work, but propellers are more efficient in

0:39:06.080 --> 0:39:10.239
<v Speaker 3>underwater vessels, so the propeller was added swapped out for

0:39:10.239 --> 0:39:13.600
<v Speaker 3>the oars. The propeller was rotated by a hand powered

0:39:13.640 --> 0:39:17.600
<v Speaker 3>crank operated by the crew inside. Air was supplied by

0:39:17.880 --> 0:39:21.400
<v Speaker 3>tubes that were attached to floats that went to the surface,

0:39:21.480 --> 0:39:24.160
<v Speaker 3>and there was an air pump, so these floats would

0:39:24.200 --> 0:39:26.600
<v Speaker 3>follow along with the ship at the surface and allow

0:39:26.800 --> 0:39:30.360
<v Speaker 3>gas exchange. Something about that feels tenuous and scary. I

0:39:30.360 --> 0:39:32.920
<v Speaker 3>guess all of this does, because it, you know, eighteen

0:39:33.040 --> 0:39:37.920
<v Speaker 3>sixty submersible. Apparently, light was provided by glass plates at

0:39:37.960 --> 0:39:41.000
<v Speaker 3>the top of the hull, and the Alligator was put

0:39:41.040 --> 0:39:44.000
<v Speaker 3>into service for a brief time, and the US Navy

0:39:44.040 --> 0:39:47.200
<v Speaker 3>had various plans for it, like they talked about potentially

0:39:47.280 --> 0:39:51.120
<v Speaker 3>using it to attack bridges or blockade runner ships. But

0:39:51.320 --> 0:39:53.680
<v Speaker 3>before it could do very much, it was lost at

0:39:53.680 --> 0:39:56.200
<v Speaker 3>sea off the coast of North Carolina during bad weather

0:39:56.640 --> 0:40:02.360
<v Speaker 3>in eighteen sixty three, So exactly a King Crab in design,

0:40:02.440 --> 0:40:06.279
<v Speaker 3>but sharing some characteristics with the proposal, though of course

0:40:06.320 --> 0:40:08.319
<v Speaker 3>this had already been built at the time this letter

0:40:08.360 --> 0:40:09.640
<v Speaker 3>came into Scientific American.

0:40:09.920 --> 0:40:13.600
<v Speaker 2>Yeah. Also just kind of an interesting snapshot of marine

0:40:13.600 --> 0:40:14.399
<v Speaker 2>warfare to come.

0:40:14.680 --> 0:40:17.879
<v Speaker 3>Yeah. So I'll say final verdict from me, the King

0:40:17.960 --> 0:40:21.400
<v Speaker 3>Crab warship. Maybe not a practical design, but I admire

0:40:21.440 --> 0:40:25.880
<v Speaker 3>the spirit the actual Atlantic horseshoe crab. Very good design.

0:40:26.280 --> 0:40:27.720
<v Speaker 3>Thumbs up, thumbs up. Evolution.

0:40:39.120 --> 0:40:41.600
<v Speaker 2>All right, Well, you know we mentioned how in one

0:40:41.600 --> 0:40:43.880
<v Speaker 2>of the previous episodes we did talk about crabs and

0:40:43.960 --> 0:40:46.919
<v Speaker 2>demonology to a certain extent. I want to come back

0:40:46.960 --> 0:40:50.040
<v Speaker 2>to that again, at least in a limited fashion, before

0:40:50.080 --> 0:40:54.920
<v Speaker 2>getting into another more prominent topic. But yeah, I was

0:40:55.480 --> 0:41:00.000
<v Speaker 2>looking around and I found a source from eighteen seventies,

0:41:00.280 --> 0:41:04.000
<v Speaker 2>so another older source here. This was titled The Folklore

0:41:04.080 --> 0:41:09.400
<v Speaker 2>of China by Nicholas Bellfield. I'm sorry, Nicholas Bellfield Denny's,

0:41:10.040 --> 0:41:13.879
<v Speaker 2>and it regarded this one little snippet, one little place

0:41:13.920 --> 0:41:18.520
<v Speaker 2>in the book concerned crabs and exorcisms among the people

0:41:18.760 --> 0:41:23.240
<v Speaker 2>in the southeastern Chinese province of Fujin. According to the author,

0:41:23.480 --> 0:41:27.320
<v Speaker 2>shortly before a child's birth, priests would attempt to scare

0:41:27.360 --> 0:41:31.000
<v Speaker 2>away demons that might harm the child during birth. So

0:41:31.040 --> 0:41:33.640
<v Speaker 2>I'm just going to read a snippet from this again,

0:41:34.920 --> 0:41:37.520
<v Speaker 2>again stressing that this isn't an older text, and I

0:41:37.520 --> 0:41:40.080
<v Speaker 2>couldn't find much. I couldn't find anything about this. It's

0:41:40.160 --> 0:41:43.680
<v Speaker 2>more contemporary. But according to this text quote, ten or

0:41:43.719 --> 0:41:46.399
<v Speaker 2>twenty pieces of a kind of grass, cut up about

0:41:46.400 --> 0:41:48.959
<v Speaker 2>an inch long, and several likenesses of the crab cut

0:41:49.000 --> 0:41:51.960
<v Speaker 2>out of common paper are put into censor and burned,

0:41:52.360 --> 0:41:54.880
<v Speaker 2>or sometimes several live crabs, after being used in this

0:41:54.960 --> 0:41:59.080
<v Speaker 2>ceremony are taken and turned into the street by way

0:41:59.080 --> 0:42:03.080
<v Speaker 2>of frightening or propitiating the spirits. The reason why crabs

0:42:03.120 --> 0:42:05.359
<v Speaker 2>are used is that the name of one of these

0:42:05.400 --> 0:42:09.200
<v Speaker 2>demons sounds like that of crab in the local dialect.

0:42:09.640 --> 0:42:12.360
<v Speaker 3>Now wait a minute, I'm a little confused here. Based

0:42:12.400 --> 0:42:15.120
<v Speaker 3>on the description, are the crabs the thing that are

0:42:15.280 --> 0:42:17.879
<v Speaker 3>the things that are being exercised to protect the mother

0:42:17.960 --> 0:42:21.120
<v Speaker 3>and the child, or are the crabs doing the protecting.

0:42:22.400 --> 0:42:25.839
<v Speaker 2>If I'm understanding this correctly, I think it's the idea

0:42:25.920 --> 0:42:28.920
<v Speaker 2>that there's just the idea of the crab is a

0:42:29.000 --> 0:42:33.680
<v Speaker 2>counter to the demon, because the demon's name sounds like crab. Okay, well,

0:42:33.760 --> 0:42:37.560
<v Speaker 2>it's almost like a mocking. I'm again I don't completely

0:42:37.600 --> 0:42:40.160
<v Speaker 2>understand it, but given that it's crab based exorcism, I

0:42:40.160 --> 0:42:41.319
<v Speaker 2>had to at least mention it.

0:42:41.960 --> 0:42:44.680
<v Speaker 3>That's interesting. But so in one form you would burn

0:42:44.880 --> 0:42:47.040
<v Speaker 3>an effigy of the crab, but in another form you

0:42:47.080 --> 0:42:50.080
<v Speaker 3>would release the crabs too into the streets, swarm the

0:42:50.120 --> 0:42:52.840
<v Speaker 3>street in front of your house to provide protection, or

0:42:52.880 --> 0:42:53.880
<v Speaker 3>scare the spirits.

0:42:53.960 --> 0:42:56.920
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, I guess again. I couldn't find much in the

0:42:56.920 --> 0:43:00.400
<v Speaker 2>way of recent sources on this, outside of some some

0:43:00.520 --> 0:43:05.960
<v Speaker 2>crab statues being sold online as Finchwei exorcism animals, though

0:43:06.000 --> 0:43:11.120
<v Speaker 2>I believe that in general, within fin Schwei and elsewhere

0:43:11.120 --> 0:43:15.480
<v Speaker 2>in Chinese culture, crabs are primarily symbols of wealth and advancement,

0:43:16.320 --> 0:43:18.880
<v Speaker 2>and in fact, if you look around, they are sometimes

0:43:18.880 --> 0:43:22.960
<v Speaker 2>depicted as holding aloft a coin or another treasure in

0:43:23.000 --> 0:43:25.719
<v Speaker 2>a very similar fashion to what we discussed previously with

0:43:25.840 --> 0:43:28.799
<v Speaker 2>the crab holding up the crucifix or some sort of

0:43:28.800 --> 0:43:30.320
<v Speaker 2>a you know, a Buddhist treasure.

0:43:31.160 --> 0:43:34.200
<v Speaker 3>Wow, so you've got an image in the outline here

0:43:34.640 --> 0:43:36.759
<v Speaker 3>of a crab holding up a coin. This, this is

0:43:36.760 --> 0:43:41.759
<v Speaker 3>a Chinese artifact here, Yes, okay, the posture is exactly

0:43:41.840 --> 0:43:46.600
<v Speaker 3>the same as that a seventeenth century or maybe it

0:43:46.640 --> 0:43:49.040
<v Speaker 3>was eighteenth century, I don't remember. The silver sculpture of

0:43:49.080 --> 0:43:52.680
<v Speaker 3>the crab holding the crucifix. I, you know, could just

0:43:52.719 --> 0:43:55.200
<v Speaker 3>be coincidence, But I wonder if one is inspired by

0:43:55.200 --> 0:43:59.000
<v Speaker 3>the other. Could the Catholic crab imagery have been inspired

0:43:59.040 --> 0:44:00.800
<v Speaker 3>by traditional China imagery.

0:44:01.520 --> 0:44:05.120
<v Speaker 2>It seems possible or certainly that both of these images

0:44:05.120 --> 0:44:08.000
<v Speaker 2>are speaking to a longer tradition of having a crab

0:44:08.320 --> 0:44:11.000
<v Speaker 2>hold up some sort of a treasure. Yeah. And then

0:44:11.040 --> 0:44:15.839
<v Speaker 2>also more common within Chinese iconography is the image of

0:44:15.880 --> 0:44:20.279
<v Speaker 2>the crab setting upon a bed of coins, almost like

0:44:20.320 --> 0:44:23.920
<v Speaker 2>a dragon in its layer. I think one thing I

0:44:23.960 --> 0:44:25.680
<v Speaker 2>think we touched on this as well. But one thing

0:44:25.719 --> 0:44:27.759
<v Speaker 2>to keep in mind is that when we look at

0:44:27.760 --> 0:44:31.520
<v Speaker 2>a crab's there is the observation of what a crab

0:44:31.600 --> 0:44:34.680
<v Speaker 2>does with its body, certainly, but there We also can't

0:44:34.680 --> 0:44:36.799
<v Speaker 2>help but to imagine what would we do. What would

0:44:36.800 --> 0:44:39.040
<v Speaker 2>a human do with a crab's body if we could,

0:44:39.080 --> 0:44:42.399
<v Speaker 2>we would do things like hold coins, grab coins and

0:44:42.560 --> 0:44:44.719
<v Speaker 2>hold them aloft, that sort of thing.

0:44:45.000 --> 0:44:50.640
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, the become an arthropods symbol of your own greed yep, cliff. Yeah.

0:44:50.680 --> 0:44:53.680
<v Speaker 2>So for more answers on this, I was fortunate enough

0:44:53.719 --> 0:44:57.360
<v Speaker 2>to find a full paper from Frontiers and Marine Science

0:44:57.400 --> 0:45:01.040
<v Speaker 2>than twenty twenty five by Yan and Zang titled the

0:45:01.040 --> 0:45:05.960
<v Speaker 2>Connotation of Chinese Crab Culture a Comprehensive Review from the

0:45:06.000 --> 0:45:10.800
<v Speaker 2>perspectives of Literature, Art and diet. So this paper is

0:45:11.000 --> 0:45:14.560
<v Speaker 2>pretty fun. It's a great breakdown of crab culture. That's

0:45:14.600 --> 0:45:18.160
<v Speaker 2>the term they use in China across numerous dynasties, so

0:45:18.280 --> 0:45:21.759
<v Speaker 2>covering a huge stretch of time. And they stress that

0:45:21.920 --> 0:45:25.839
<v Speaker 2>of course you can't ignore the fact that crabs are delicious,

0:45:26.560 --> 0:45:30.160
<v Speaker 2>and then on top of them just being delicious, they

0:45:30.200 --> 0:45:36.560
<v Speaker 2>hold not only this practical value but also significant theoretical value. Again,

0:45:36.760 --> 0:45:39.040
<v Speaker 2>we can't help but look at the crab and imagine

0:45:39.080 --> 0:45:41.400
<v Speaker 2>things related to the crab. What would we do if

0:45:41.440 --> 0:45:43.319
<v Speaker 2>we were a crab? What does the crab say about us?

0:45:44.080 --> 0:45:49.520
<v Speaker 2>And so forth. So they quote numerous bits of old

0:45:49.600 --> 0:45:52.960
<v Speaker 2>Chinese poetry, and a lot of these are first and

0:45:53.000 --> 0:45:56.600
<v Speaker 2>foremost talking about how delicious crab meat is, but then

0:45:56.960 --> 0:45:59.960
<v Speaker 2>in doing so also talking about how novel the creature

0:46:00.120 --> 0:46:03.279
<v Speaker 2>are to look at. I'm gonna read this is a

0:46:03.880 --> 0:46:06.560
<v Speaker 2>This is a snippet from the paper that quote the quote.

0:46:06.560 --> 0:46:10.600
<v Speaker 2>The quotes a poem as well. They say, Zoo Way,

0:46:10.719 --> 0:46:14.000
<v Speaker 2>a famous writer and painter in the Ming dynasty, once

0:46:14.040 --> 0:46:17.440
<v Speaker 2>wrote a poem which reads as follows. In the village

0:46:17.440 --> 0:46:20.919
<v Speaker 2>alongside rivers, the crabs are plump. When the rice is ripe,

0:46:21.400 --> 0:46:24.279
<v Speaker 2>the two kilipet of the crabs stand up like a

0:46:24.320 --> 0:46:27.719
<v Speaker 2>halbard in the green mud of the paddy field. If

0:46:27.719 --> 0:46:30.320
<v Speaker 2>you turn them over, you see a round and bulging

0:46:30.400 --> 0:46:33.920
<v Speaker 2>navel like dong Zou's belly button. And that's the end

0:46:33.960 --> 0:46:36.560
<v Speaker 2>of the poem. But then the authors continue while praising

0:46:36.600 --> 0:46:39.759
<v Speaker 2>the fatness of crab meat. This poem also uses metaphor

0:46:39.880 --> 0:46:44.680
<v Speaker 2>to satirize Dongzhou, a tyrannical trader. Naturally, this kind of

0:46:44.719 --> 0:46:48.560
<v Speaker 2>direct metaphor with the appearance characteristics of crab is slightly shallow.

0:46:49.760 --> 0:46:52.080
<v Speaker 2>But they go on to decite other poems as well,

0:46:52.120 --> 0:46:55.680
<v Speaker 2>where there is like the main point tends to be

0:46:55.920 --> 0:46:58.560
<v Speaker 2>man crab meat is so delicious, or there's more than

0:46:58.600 --> 0:47:01.080
<v Speaker 2>one where it's like crab meat and wine. What a

0:47:01.120 --> 0:47:01.680
<v Speaker 2>great comba.

0:47:04.080 --> 0:47:07.040
<v Speaker 3>This makes me think about how the I mean this

0:47:07.120 --> 0:47:10.719
<v Speaker 3>might be obvious, but about how the connotations of comparing

0:47:10.719 --> 0:47:14.120
<v Speaker 3>a person to a particular animal or not culturally universal,

0:47:14.280 --> 0:47:17.080
<v Speaker 3>So like comparing a person to a dog or a

0:47:17.120 --> 0:47:20.359
<v Speaker 3>pig in one culture might have very different connotations than

0:47:20.400 --> 0:47:24.760
<v Speaker 3>in another culture. And I have basically no cultural context

0:47:24.760 --> 0:47:27.400
<v Speaker 3>for comparing a person to a crab? What does that

0:47:27.480 --> 0:47:28.000
<v Speaker 3>mean at all?

0:47:29.160 --> 0:47:31.719
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, I mean I have yet. This would be a

0:47:31.719 --> 0:47:34.919
<v Speaker 2>great opportunity for listeners out there, but I can't think

0:47:34.960 --> 0:47:38.160
<v Speaker 2>of any examples where that I've ever heard where a

0:47:38.280 --> 0:47:42.760
<v Speaker 2>person is directly compared to a crab in a favorable way. Now, again,

0:47:42.840 --> 0:47:46.280
<v Speaker 2>we are discussing, and we'll be discussing a prime example

0:47:46.400 --> 0:47:49.920
<v Speaker 2>of a crab as a positive totem, as a as

0:47:49.960 --> 0:47:52.640
<v Speaker 2>a as an icon of good luck. And that's one thing.

0:47:53.000 --> 0:47:55.200
<v Speaker 2>But in terms of saying, hey, you're being a crab,

0:47:55.320 --> 0:47:56.960
<v Speaker 2>or you are like a crab, or that person is

0:47:57.080 --> 0:47:59.399
<v Speaker 2>like a crab, I don't know if I've ever heard

0:47:59.400 --> 0:48:02.920
<v Speaker 2>it with a real with a with a strong positive

0:48:03.200 --> 0:48:03.960
<v Speaker 2>framing to it.

0:48:04.880 --> 0:48:07.800
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, so I don't know how to take the crab's

0:48:07.960 --> 0:48:11.840
<v Speaker 3>navel is like this tyrannical trader's belly button.

0:48:12.080 --> 0:48:14.719
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, I mean it sounds like they're mocking a someone

0:48:14.719 --> 0:48:19.000
<v Speaker 2>who's considered a batty in an enemy. Yeah. But they

0:48:19.080 --> 0:48:21.480
<v Speaker 2>they also cite a legend. The authors here side a

0:48:21.560 --> 0:48:26.279
<v Speaker 2>legend regarding the first consumption of crab. There's talk about

0:48:26.280 --> 0:48:28.279
<v Speaker 2>how well crabs are fearsome, So the first people to

0:48:28.360 --> 0:48:30.040
<v Speaker 2>eat the crab meat, they had to have been warriors.

0:48:30.040 --> 0:48:32.239
<v Speaker 2>They had have been mighty, because who would think to

0:48:32.239 --> 0:48:34.480
<v Speaker 2>do this? Who would think to rise up against the crabs?

0:48:34.800 --> 0:48:40.600
<v Speaker 2>But they cited a legend regarding the originator of eating crabs,

0:48:41.200 --> 0:48:43.279
<v Speaker 2>and they say that it was said to have been

0:48:43.320 --> 0:48:48.480
<v Speaker 2>a flood manager named Baja working for the legendary engineer

0:48:48.480 --> 0:48:50.640
<v Speaker 2>you the Great, who we've talked about on the show before,

0:48:52.120 --> 0:48:55.640
<v Speaker 2>very much a cultural hero, you know, someone who steals

0:48:55.719 --> 0:49:01.759
<v Speaker 2>the or acquires the supernatural soil to aid in flood management.

0:49:02.160 --> 0:49:05.120
<v Speaker 2>And then one of his essentially underlings is the first

0:49:05.200 --> 0:49:08.839
<v Speaker 2>to boil a crab, smell the aroma and say this

0:49:09.120 --> 0:49:11.080
<v Speaker 2>just seems pretty good. And then eat it and then

0:49:11.120 --> 0:49:14.640
<v Speaker 2>pass that wisdom on to people as well. So I

0:49:14.680 --> 0:49:16.560
<v Speaker 2>guess maybe the idea here is that, like, you know,

0:49:17.960 --> 0:49:20.520
<v Speaker 2>realizing you can eat crabs is almost kind of like

0:49:20.520 --> 0:49:23.520
<v Speaker 2>a great cultural achievement on par with flood management.

0:49:23.920 --> 0:49:26.160
<v Speaker 3>This just reminds me. I'm having a hazy memory of

0:49:26.200 --> 0:49:30.160
<v Speaker 3>another Chinese folk character we've talked about on the show

0:49:30.160 --> 0:49:33.160
<v Speaker 3>before who is famous for figuring out what foods are

0:49:33.160 --> 0:49:33.800
<v Speaker 3>good to eat.

0:49:34.200 --> 0:49:38.240
<v Speaker 2>Oh yeah, you're thinking of Shinong the Oh yeah, yeah.

0:49:38.520 --> 0:49:42.600
<v Speaker 2>The legend goes, you know, tried every orb, basically tried

0:49:43.480 --> 0:49:46.480
<v Speaker 2>all these different poisons, even in order to determine what

0:49:46.560 --> 0:49:48.320
<v Speaker 2>is good and what is usable and so forth.

0:49:48.560 --> 0:49:52.399
<v Speaker 3>Okay, but here we have the seafood focused version of that,

0:49:52.760 --> 0:49:54.279
<v Speaker 3>or at least not trying all of them, but at

0:49:54.360 --> 0:49:55.280
<v Speaker 3>least trying the crab.

0:49:55.600 --> 0:49:55.880
<v Speaker 2>Yeah.

0:49:56.000 --> 0:49:58.359
<v Speaker 3>It looks a little scary at first, but it is good.

0:49:58.960 --> 0:50:02.239
<v Speaker 2>Yeah. Yeah. And apparently there's a there's a park in

0:50:02.360 --> 0:50:05.759
<v Speaker 2>Kunshan City in China that is that is named for

0:50:05.840 --> 0:50:08.600
<v Speaker 2>this figure, and it has a number of different statues

0:50:08.640 --> 0:50:10.799
<v Speaker 2>of crabs. This is mentioned in the article, and they

0:50:10.840 --> 0:50:13.319
<v Speaker 2>include some photographs which I reproduce for you here. Joe

0:50:13.320 --> 0:50:16.360
<v Speaker 2>in our notes. Uh, and you can see there's one

0:50:16.400 --> 0:50:20.399
<v Speaker 2>that has a child, either a large child or well,

0:50:20.480 --> 0:50:22.399
<v Speaker 2>either a small child or a large crab. But there

0:50:22.480 --> 0:50:24.720
<v Speaker 2>is a it is a large statue of a crab

0:50:24.760 --> 0:50:26.240
<v Speaker 2>with a child on its back.

0:50:26.560 --> 0:50:27.200
<v Speaker 3>Adorable.

0:50:27.680 --> 0:50:30.840
<v Speaker 2>And then there here is another giant heap of coins

0:50:31.000 --> 0:50:34.040
<v Speaker 2>and a crab is on top of that pile of coins,

0:50:34.080 --> 0:50:36.200
<v Speaker 2>again like a like a Western dragon.

0:50:36.719 --> 0:50:41.800
<v Speaker 3>Yeah. So uh the crab has this recurring association with

0:50:41.800 --> 0:50:43.239
<v Speaker 3>with riches and abundance.

0:50:44.120 --> 0:50:46.919
<v Speaker 2>Yes, yeah, And so I dug into that a little

0:50:46.960 --> 0:50:49.840
<v Speaker 2>bit to term to determine like where does that come from?

0:50:51.000 --> 0:50:55.319
<v Speaker 2>And uh, Basically the crab wealth connection comes down to

0:50:55.480 --> 0:50:59.480
<v Speaker 2>some of the crab's symbolic characteristics and also another classic

0:50:59.600 --> 0:51:02.759
<v Speaker 2>Chinese homophone, you know, words that sound the same but

0:51:02.800 --> 0:51:06.920
<v Speaker 2>have unrelated meanings. So the shell of a crab is ja,

0:51:07.239 --> 0:51:10.160
<v Speaker 2>which also means if it would mean if I was

0:51:10.440 --> 0:51:13.719
<v Speaker 2>one hundred percent pronouncing it correctly, and I am probably not,

0:51:14.560 --> 0:51:18.680
<v Speaker 2>But it means number one with or you know, top performing,

0:51:19.000 --> 0:51:24.360
<v Speaker 2>but with special connotations regarding the old Imperial examination ranking system.

0:51:24.840 --> 0:51:27.480
<v Speaker 3>Oh okay, number one, best of the best.

0:51:27.520 --> 0:51:31.279
<v Speaker 2>Right right, So the crab shell and also you know,

0:51:31.360 --> 0:51:33.960
<v Speaker 2>ranking number one in something. These ideas are closely ranked

0:51:34.400 --> 0:51:37.640
<v Speaker 2>symbolically linked via language, and then you have some other

0:51:37.680 --> 0:51:40.000
<v Speaker 2>things in play too. So the crab has an auspicious

0:51:40.040 --> 0:51:43.680
<v Speaker 2>number of legs eight and it's there also is this

0:51:43.800 --> 0:51:49.280
<v Speaker 2>idea that it's sideways walking has business success connotations concerning

0:51:49.440 --> 0:51:51.759
<v Speaker 2>easy money or side fortunes.

0:51:53.880 --> 0:51:57.440
<v Speaker 3>This is that like making money on the side or.

0:51:57.880 --> 0:52:00.120
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, it's like hinkai, I think, And I think sometimes

0:52:00.120 --> 0:52:03.160
<v Speaker 2>that has very negative connotations, like you're running a scam

0:52:03.480 --> 0:52:05.960
<v Speaker 2>or it's ill gotten gains. But I think depending on

0:52:06.040 --> 0:52:09.600
<v Speaker 2>how it's used, it can also mean things that are

0:52:10.360 --> 0:52:13.640
<v Speaker 2>that are certainly legal and above board, but are also

0:52:13.800 --> 0:52:16.160
<v Speaker 2>kind of like a matter of luck, you know, coming

0:52:16.160 --> 0:52:20.040
<v Speaker 2>down to good fortune in business, things outside of your control.

0:52:21.120 --> 0:52:25.000
<v Speaker 2>And I guess lateral movement. And then yeah, and then

0:52:25.080 --> 0:52:27.000
<v Speaker 2>the big one too is that this comes back to

0:52:27.040 --> 0:52:30.200
<v Speaker 2>what we were saying earlier. Just crab claws look like things

0:52:30.280 --> 0:52:33.600
<v Speaker 2>that could hold onto coins. They could grab coins and

0:52:33.640 --> 0:52:35.920
<v Speaker 2>then hold on to them. And also coming down to

0:52:36.000 --> 0:52:37.960
<v Speaker 2>just the nature of the crab, knowing that you know,

0:52:38.000 --> 0:52:41.239
<v Speaker 2>a crab can be a little fighty if cornered the

0:52:41.360 --> 0:52:44.560
<v Speaker 2>flighty or fighty there, they can be a little intimidating.

0:52:44.600 --> 0:52:46.640
<v Speaker 2>They can appear to stand their ground, so we can

0:52:46.680 --> 0:52:49.320
<v Speaker 2>imagine them saying, no, that's my coin and I'm not

0:52:49.360 --> 0:52:50.000
<v Speaker 2>going to let it go.

0:52:50.920 --> 0:52:53.440
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, I can see all of that. And I don't know,

0:52:53.880 --> 0:52:56.680
<v Speaker 3>this might have gone past me. But if we didn't clarify,

0:52:57.400 --> 0:52:59.560
<v Speaker 3>why is it that, in addition to having the tequila

0:52:59.680 --> 0:53:01.759
<v Speaker 3>or that the two claws, it has eight legs? Why

0:53:01.800 --> 0:53:04.600
<v Speaker 3>would eight be auspicious that generally the number eight is

0:53:04.640 --> 0:53:07.200
<v Speaker 3>thought of as lucky in Chinese culture? Correct?

0:53:07.280 --> 0:53:09.560
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, yeah, So it's like all these things kind of

0:53:09.560 --> 0:53:12.400
<v Speaker 2>coming together with the crab, and I think again also

0:53:12.520 --> 0:53:15.799
<v Speaker 2>just the huge factor that crabs are amusing to look at.

0:53:16.960 --> 0:53:20.800
<v Speaker 2>If the crab wasn't so entertaining in and out itself,

0:53:21.120 --> 0:53:23.520
<v Speaker 2>we wouldn't heap on all of these ideas.

0:53:24.360 --> 0:53:26.839
<v Speaker 3>Well, Rob, I think we need to wrap up part

0:53:26.920 --> 0:53:29.080
<v Speaker 3>three of the crab Bag there, but this has been

0:53:29.160 --> 0:53:32.839
<v Speaker 3>yet another enjoyable and enlightening episode. So, folks at home,

0:53:32.880 --> 0:53:35.240
<v Speaker 3>I hope you will join us for crab Bag number

0:53:35.239 --> 0:53:36.280
<v Speaker 3>four on Thursday.

0:53:36.560 --> 0:53:38.239
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, and in the meantime, go ahead and write in.

0:53:38.920 --> 0:53:41.160
<v Speaker 2>We'd love to hear. I'd love to hear from anyone

0:53:41.200 --> 0:53:45.200
<v Speaker 2>out there who can speak more to the crab as

0:53:45.200 --> 0:53:50.439
<v Speaker 2>a symbol of business, luck and good fortune in Chinese cultures. Yeah,

0:53:50.440 --> 0:53:53.759
<v Speaker 2>if you have some personal examples or observations of that

0:53:53.920 --> 0:53:56.560
<v Speaker 2>right in, send your photos. We would love to hear

0:53:56.600 --> 0:53:56.960
<v Speaker 2>from you.

0:53:57.840 --> 0:54:01.280
<v Speaker 3>Also, if there is some really significant way that crabs

0:54:01.280 --> 0:54:04.239
<v Speaker 3>feature in your culture, something interesting about crabs where you

0:54:04.320 --> 0:54:06.560
<v Speaker 3>live that we haven't talked about yet, send it on

0:54:06.600 --> 0:54:07.400
<v Speaker 3>our way let us know.

0:54:07.719 --> 0:54:10.359
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, and what is your favorite sci fi crab based

0:54:10.400 --> 0:54:13.080
<v Speaker 2>war machine? Also fair game and I know some of

0:54:13.080 --> 0:54:15.680
<v Speaker 2>you will write in about that for sure. Just a

0:54:15.719 --> 0:54:17.719
<v Speaker 2>reminder to everyone out there that Stuff to Blow Your

0:54:17.719 --> 0:54:20.040
<v Speaker 2>Mind is primarily a science and culture podcast, with core

0:54:20.080 --> 0:54:23.440
<v Speaker 2>episodes in Tuesdays and Thursdays, short form episodes on Wednesdays

0:54:23.480 --> 0:54:25.680
<v Speaker 2>and on Fridays. We set aside most serious concerns to

0:54:25.719 --> 0:54:28.120
<v Speaker 2>just talk about a weird film on weird House Cinema.

0:54:28.640 --> 0:54:30.399
<v Speaker 2>Stuff to blil Your Mind has been around for years

0:54:30.400 --> 0:54:33.800
<v Speaker 2>and years. At this point, we are new to Netflix, however,

0:54:34.520 --> 0:54:36.880
<v Speaker 2>so there are only so many episodes that you'll find

0:54:37.080 --> 0:54:40.960
<v Speaker 2>in a visual form on Netflix. The rest are going

0:54:41.000 --> 0:54:44.160
<v Speaker 2>to be in audio form wherever you get your audio podcasts,

0:54:44.239 --> 0:54:46.840
<v Speaker 2>and you can find pretty extensive archive there.

0:54:46.760 --> 0:54:49.040
<v Speaker 3>That's right, and it's the same show. By the way,

0:54:49.440 --> 0:54:51.680
<v Speaker 3>just in case people are wondering, the version that we're

0:54:51.680 --> 0:54:54.680
<v Speaker 3>putting out on Netflix is just the video version of

0:54:54.760 --> 0:54:57.359
<v Speaker 3>the audio podcast that we release at the same time

0:54:57.440 --> 0:55:00.319
<v Speaker 3>in audio feed. So yeah, if you have a found

0:55:00.400 --> 0:55:03.120
<v Speaker 3>us in one on one platform and you want to

0:55:03.200 --> 0:55:06.520
<v Speaker 3>check us out on the other, go for it. Absolutely huge,

0:55:06.560 --> 0:55:09.960
<v Speaker 3>thanks as always to our excellent audio producer JJ Posway.

0:55:10.520 --> 0:55:12.080
<v Speaker 3>If you would like to get in touch with us

0:55:12.160 --> 0:55:14.640
<v Speaker 3>with feedback on this episode or any other, to suggest

0:55:14.719 --> 0:55:16.680
<v Speaker 3>a topic for the future, or just to say hello,

0:55:16.800 --> 0:55:19.279
<v Speaker 3>you can email us at contact at stuff to Blow

0:55:19.280 --> 0:55:27.239
<v Speaker 3>your Mind dot com.

0:55:27.360 --> 0:55:30.319
<v Speaker 1>Stuff to Blow Your Mind is production of iHeartRadio. For

0:55:30.400 --> 0:55:33.160
<v Speaker 1>more podcasts from my heart Radio, visit the iHeartRadio app,

0:55:33.320 --> 0:55:50.560
<v Speaker 1>Apple Podcasts, or wherever you listen to your favorite shows.