WEBVTT - FFW Micro - Jared Goff

0:00:01.680 --> 0:00:07.320
<v Speaker 1>You found Fantasy Football Weekly Micro a deep dive on

0:00:07.320 --> 0:00:10.600
<v Speaker 1>one player in just five to ten minutes. Now, here's

0:00:10.640 --> 0:00:16.319
<v Speaker 1>your host, Paul Chargian. Welcome to Fantasy Football Weekly Micro edition.

0:00:16.360 --> 0:00:19.760
<v Speaker 1>I'm Paul Charchi and my co host, as usual is

0:00:19.880 --> 0:00:23.079
<v Speaker 1>Tyler Cannabili. For each of our Fantasy Football Weekly micros.

0:00:23.480 --> 0:00:25.759
<v Speaker 1>Going on vacation pretty soon, and we're gonna have to

0:00:25.920 --> 0:00:27.760
<v Speaker 1>figure out what we're gonna do when when I'm gone.

0:00:27.800 --> 0:00:28.200
<v Speaker 1>I don't know.

0:00:28.400 --> 0:00:30.520
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, maybe just let me solo host it with a

0:00:30.560 --> 0:00:31.400
<v Speaker 2>couple of my buddies.

0:00:33.080 --> 0:00:36.559
<v Speaker 1>I don't trust your buddies. Trust you, Yeah, you got

0:00:36.560 --> 0:00:37.560
<v Speaker 1>a lot of shady friends.

0:00:37.640 --> 0:00:37.840
<v Speaker 2>Yeah.

0:00:37.800 --> 0:00:40.400
<v Speaker 1>I don't think I want anywhere near a Fantasy Football

0:00:40.400 --> 0:00:44.480
<v Speaker 1>Weekly microphone, the golden Fantasy Football Weekly microphone exactly. Yeah,

0:00:44.600 --> 0:00:45.320
<v Speaker 1>very very important.

0:00:45.320 --> 0:00:46.640
<v Speaker 2>We'll not let them on these airwaves.

0:00:46.720 --> 0:00:51.880
<v Speaker 1>Today's micro is a deep dive on Jared Goff.

0:00:52.320 --> 0:00:55.520
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, twenty twenty two finish. He was like QB ten great,

0:00:55.640 --> 0:00:56.080
<v Speaker 2>pretty good.

0:00:56.280 --> 0:00:58.320
<v Speaker 1>I mean you went off the board at what about

0:00:58.400 --> 0:01:02.480
<v Speaker 1>quarterback or something? I would guess yeah, yeah.

0:01:02.160 --> 0:01:04.840
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, And he's going later again and dressed this year

0:01:04.880 --> 0:01:07.160
<v Speaker 3>as ADP is currently the QB fifteen.

0:01:07.480 --> 0:01:10.360
<v Speaker 1>So I think it's weird that his ADP is lower.

0:01:10.959 --> 0:01:12.959
<v Speaker 1>So he finished last year's QB ten, but he's going

0:01:13.000 --> 0:01:16.560
<v Speaker 1>off the board now today is QB fifteen. Weird that

0:01:16.640 --> 0:01:21.520
<v Speaker 1>his ADP is sliding by five spots. But everybody's so

0:01:21.640 --> 0:01:24.440
<v Speaker 1>high on the Lions, and rightfully so. The way they

0:01:24.440 --> 0:01:26.800
<v Speaker 1>finished the season, it all came together. They were an

0:01:26.800 --> 0:01:30.120
<v Speaker 1>incredibly tough out. You know, they beat the Vikings down

0:01:30.120 --> 0:01:32.120
<v Speaker 1>the stretch at thirteen and Viking team, they knocked the

0:01:32.160 --> 0:01:33.960
<v Speaker 1>Packers out of the playoffs. I mean, they had so

0:01:34.120 --> 0:01:36.600
<v Speaker 1>much momentum at the end of the year, and people

0:01:36.640 --> 0:01:38.600
<v Speaker 1>are like, that's Jared Goff.

0:01:38.360 --> 0:01:38.920
<v Speaker 2>Out of want um.

0:01:39.240 --> 0:01:41.720
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, it's just kind of like, no one likes Jared

0:01:41.720 --> 0:01:44.800
<v Speaker 3>GoF because he's the most boring QB in maybe in

0:01:44.840 --> 0:01:47.720
<v Speaker 3>the league, because he's he's just Jared Goff, Like we

0:01:47.800 --> 0:01:50.080
<v Speaker 3>know what we're gonna get from Jared Goff. But you

0:01:50.120 --> 0:01:52.600
<v Speaker 3>look at all the pieces he has around him, and

0:01:52.800 --> 0:01:55.360
<v Speaker 3>like just everything that he had, like the O line,

0:01:55.400 --> 0:01:58.880
<v Speaker 3>the play calling, the weapons. This debatably, if you take

0:01:58.920 --> 0:02:01.840
<v Speaker 3>all those into account, might be a top three supporting

0:02:01.880 --> 0:02:03.080
<v Speaker 3>cast in the entire league.

0:02:03.160 --> 0:02:05.120
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, I think that could be the case. You got

0:02:05.600 --> 0:02:09.600
<v Speaker 1>I'm on Ross Saint Brown, You've got DeAndre Swift and

0:02:09.720 --> 0:02:14.560
<v Speaker 1>David Montgomery. As past catching running backs, you've got Jamison Williams.

0:02:14.600 --> 0:02:17.919
<v Speaker 1>And once you get to week seven, dumbass, you've got

0:02:18.080 --> 0:02:21.239
<v Speaker 1>Marvin Jones coming back to town. That's helpful. No tight

0:02:21.320 --> 0:02:23.239
<v Speaker 1>end right now, but that's something they might solve in

0:02:23.320 --> 0:02:26.760
<v Speaker 1>a very good tight end draft. We talked on Friday's

0:02:26.880 --> 0:02:31.079
<v Speaker 1>edition of Fantasy Football Weekly Dwayne Washington Man, Darnell Washington

0:02:31.120 --> 0:02:33.760
<v Speaker 1>arn now, sorry, thank you, Darnell Washington. And if he

0:02:33.800 --> 0:02:36.200
<v Speaker 1>can find his way to Detroit, Oh, that'd be great.

0:02:36.240 --> 0:02:38.799
<v Speaker 1>I think he's going to Green Bay. But all right,

0:02:38.840 --> 0:02:41.440
<v Speaker 1>so let's let's talk through Jared Goff's game a little bit.

0:02:41.440 --> 0:02:44.720
<v Speaker 1>There were some good stats that last year revealed for

0:02:44.919 --> 0:02:48.080
<v Speaker 1>what we could see, you know, when everything's clicking in

0:02:48.120 --> 0:02:49.480
<v Speaker 1>this offense for him.

0:02:49.800 --> 0:02:51.560
<v Speaker 2>Yeah. I mean one of the things that I don't

0:02:51.560 --> 0:02:52.600
<v Speaker 2>even know what's good said or not.

0:02:52.680 --> 0:02:55.040
<v Speaker 3>He's number one in passing yards off play action plays,

0:02:55.080 --> 0:02:56.560
<v Speaker 3>which I mean is obviously a good stat I don't

0:02:56.560 --> 0:02:58.680
<v Speaker 3>know what it means necessarily. I feel like when you're

0:02:58.720 --> 0:03:00.639
<v Speaker 3>doing play action that means the off it's kind of

0:03:00.680 --> 0:03:02.600
<v Speaker 3>just clicking on all cylinders. So I really like that

0:03:02.680 --> 0:03:05.000
<v Speaker 3>stat that he was number one in passing yards off

0:03:05.040 --> 0:03:08.399
<v Speaker 3>play action. He was also seventh and next gen stats aggressiveness.

0:03:08.440 --> 0:03:12.000
<v Speaker 3>Aggressiveness is oh my god, aggressiveness rating, which is a

0:03:12.040 --> 0:03:12.560
<v Speaker 3>willingness to.

0:03:12.560 --> 0:03:14.680
<v Speaker 2>Show to kind of thrown at tight windows.

0:03:14.720 --> 0:03:16.520
<v Speaker 3>So that's kind of a nice stat to see from

0:03:16.600 --> 0:03:18.079
<v Speaker 3>which kind of people always thought it was like the

0:03:18.160 --> 0:03:19.360
<v Speaker 3>dink and dunk Jared Cough.

0:03:19.480 --> 0:03:22.959
<v Speaker 1>So yeah, now the aggressiveness stats sometimes means you're a

0:03:22.960 --> 0:03:25.880
<v Speaker 1>bad quarterback making bad decisions. Justin Fields was number one

0:03:25.919 --> 0:03:28.880
<v Speaker 1>in aggressiveness, but it was mostly bad judgment. He was

0:03:28.960 --> 0:03:31.400
<v Speaker 1>throwing into tight windows and he should not. He should

0:03:31.520 --> 0:03:33.200
<v Speaker 1>just a field should not be throwing into tight windows

0:03:33.240 --> 0:03:35.560
<v Speaker 1>at this stage of his career. But Jared Goff's a

0:03:35.640 --> 0:03:39.040
<v Speaker 1>savvy veteran, spend a Super Bowl. If he's throwing into

0:03:39.120 --> 0:03:41.600
<v Speaker 1>tight windows, I trust him to be better about that.

0:03:42.160 --> 0:03:45.000
<v Speaker 1>He was also seventh shortest and intended air yards, which

0:03:45.000 --> 0:03:48.360
<v Speaker 1>is a little disappointing. That is a huge, huge indicator

0:03:48.440 --> 0:03:52.360
<v Speaker 1>for fantasy success for receivers and others. But I want

0:03:52.360 --> 0:03:55.040
<v Speaker 1>to believe that that's going to open up when Jamison

0:03:55.080 --> 0:03:57.680
<v Speaker 1>Williams especially comes back and brings his crazy speed to

0:03:57.720 --> 0:04:00.360
<v Speaker 1>this offense that Goffs can be throwing deeper down field.

0:04:00.560 --> 0:04:01.960
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, well, I mean you look at the guys that

0:04:02.040 --> 0:04:04.400
<v Speaker 3>have on just kind of as their receivers. They don't

0:04:04.400 --> 0:04:07.360
<v Speaker 3>really have any of those field structure guys outside of

0:04:07.400 --> 0:04:09.440
<v Speaker 3>jameson Wims. They had Chart last season. He's coming off

0:04:09.440 --> 0:04:10.960
<v Speaker 3>in ACL. I mean, other than that, they have a

0:04:11.000 --> 0:04:12.720
<v Speaker 3>mon Ro He's not a burner. He's kind of more

0:04:12.720 --> 0:04:14.960
<v Speaker 3>of a slot guy going to get you tough yard.

0:04:15.160 --> 0:04:16.120
<v Speaker 1>He's a work the middle guy.

0:04:16.200 --> 0:04:16.360
<v Speaker 2>Yeah.

0:04:16.360 --> 0:04:18.839
<v Speaker 3>And also they got Josh Reynolds, also not a burner,

0:04:18.920 --> 0:04:20.880
<v Speaker 3>so they don't really have the personnel to kind of

0:04:20.880 --> 0:04:24.039
<v Speaker 3>go deep on those you know, those deep passes, which

0:04:24.240 --> 0:04:26.400
<v Speaker 3>which is why I think they drafted James and Williams.

0:04:26.400 --> 0:04:28.760
<v Speaker 1>So, oh for sure that was the point of getting

0:04:28.839 --> 0:04:31.000
<v Speaker 1>James and Williams. It just hasn't born fruit.

0:04:31.320 --> 0:04:34.200
<v Speaker 3>Suspension for the guy, by the way, very tough suspension.

0:04:34.360 --> 0:04:37.760
<v Speaker 3>What do you mean he so he been on a

0:04:37.800 --> 0:04:40.440
<v Speaker 3>college game, which you were allowed to do in per

0:04:40.480 --> 0:04:42.560
<v Speaker 3>the rules of the NFL. He'd been on a college game,

0:04:42.760 --> 0:04:45.039
<v Speaker 3>but because he did it in the facility and not

0:04:45.120 --> 0:04:46.520
<v Speaker 3>at home, he's out for six games.

0:04:46.520 --> 0:04:47.720
<v Speaker 2>That seems like a crazy rule.

0:04:47.839 --> 0:04:51.160
<v Speaker 1>Man, I don't have a lot of sympathy because everybody

0:04:51.320 --> 0:04:54.200
<v Speaker 1>knows the rules it is, so it's been made so

0:04:54.360 --> 0:04:57.239
<v Speaker 1>crystal clear. Right he didn't. Not betting on the NFL

0:04:57.240 --> 0:05:00.160
<v Speaker 1>certainly helps since why he's not out all year. Right, Yeah,

0:05:00.240 --> 0:05:03.400
<v Speaker 1>but they you know, I I what they don't with

0:05:03.440 --> 0:05:07.359
<v Speaker 1>the NFL is trying to avoid is the Lions. You know,

0:05:07.400 --> 0:05:09.719
<v Speaker 1>the Lions front office is a gambling ring. You know,

0:05:10.360 --> 0:05:12.719
<v Speaker 1>That's what they're trying to avoid. And and the Lion's

0:05:12.760 --> 0:05:15.600
<v Speaker 1>front office, you know, the front offices have got scouts,

0:05:15.600 --> 0:05:17.839
<v Speaker 1>some people who are doing all this deep dive college

0:05:18.400 --> 0:05:21.200
<v Speaker 1>football analysis, and I think they're they're, you know, the

0:05:21.400 --> 0:05:24.120
<v Speaker 1>least nervous about that. But man, I don't. I don't know.

0:05:24.240 --> 0:05:25.680
<v Speaker 1>I just feel like the league, you know, all these

0:05:25.680 --> 0:05:27.000
<v Speaker 1>players know they know better.

0:05:27.760 --> 0:05:29.760
<v Speaker 2>That's fair. I mean, I I thought that too.

0:05:29.880 --> 0:05:32.040
<v Speaker 3>So I was watching Pat McAfee the morning it happen,

0:05:32.120 --> 0:05:35.159
<v Speaker 3>and I had Ian Rappaport on, and Rappaport said that

0:05:36.520 --> 0:05:38.640
<v Speaker 3>like he didn't even know the rules, like he said

0:05:38.640 --> 0:05:40.360
<v Speaker 3>he read the gambling thing. He said he didn't even

0:05:40.360 --> 0:05:42.280
<v Speaker 3>know it was legal to gamel inside the building, which

0:05:42.320 --> 0:05:43.359
<v Speaker 3>I thought was pretty interesting.

0:05:43.400 --> 0:05:46.080
<v Speaker 1>So yeah, but the NFL doesn't do for him what

0:05:46.600 --> 0:05:48.279
<v Speaker 1>it will do for its players, and all the ways

0:05:48.279 --> 0:05:50.200
<v Speaker 1>they explain it and everything else. But that's we're off

0:05:50.360 --> 0:05:53.440
<v Speaker 1>we're off topic on Jared Goff. But it does give

0:05:53.480 --> 0:05:55.520
<v Speaker 1>you some upside in the second half of the season

0:05:55.600 --> 0:06:01.120
<v Speaker 1>for Jared Goff when when he does get back. Jamison Williams,

0:06:02.560 --> 0:06:06.440
<v Speaker 1>potentially some people are turned off by the lack of

0:06:06.480 --> 0:06:11.400
<v Speaker 1>upside for Jared Goff, not enough big explosive games.

0:06:12.040 --> 0:06:13.880
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, so I kind of dug into some of those,

0:06:13.960 --> 0:06:16.840
<v Speaker 3>like that explosiveness that you were talking about. So we said,

0:06:16.920 --> 0:06:19.120
<v Speaker 3>Jared Goff finished as the QB ten, and I thought

0:06:19.120 --> 0:06:20.760
<v Speaker 3>it was kind of interesting the qbs that.

0:06:20.800 --> 0:06:23.039
<v Speaker 2>Were kind of from five to ten and one to five.

0:06:23.080 --> 0:06:26.200
<v Speaker 3>What kind of separates you from that, like top five

0:06:26.200 --> 0:06:27.040
<v Speaker 3>finishing kind of thing.

0:06:27.080 --> 0:06:27.839
<v Speaker 2>So I broke it down.

0:06:27.880 --> 0:06:31.240
<v Speaker 3>I looked at other qbs inside the top ten with

0:06:31.480 --> 0:06:35.520
<v Speaker 3>four or less top five weekly finishes. So we had

0:06:36.200 --> 0:06:39.600
<v Speaker 3>Justin Herbert who was had two top five weekly finishes,

0:06:40.000 --> 0:06:43.159
<v Speaker 3>Daniel Jones had three, Kirk Cousins had three, and Gino

0:06:43.200 --> 0:06:45.320
<v Speaker 3>Smith had four, and those were all qbs that were

0:06:45.360 --> 0:06:48.000
<v Speaker 3>actually ranged from five to ten, and Jared Goff had

0:06:48.320 --> 0:06:51.800
<v Speaker 3>four as well. So all the qbs from five to

0:06:51.839 --> 0:06:52.839
<v Speaker 3>ten all had like.

0:06:52.880 --> 0:06:55.240
<v Speaker 2>No more than four TOPI five finishes.

0:06:55.240 --> 0:06:57.039
<v Speaker 1>There's a lot of numbers floating around, but the big

0:06:57.080 --> 0:06:59.880
<v Speaker 1>one being through the entire season. Goff played the whole

0:06:59.880 --> 0:07:03.520
<v Speaker 1>se exactly cal he only was able to crack the

0:07:03.560 --> 0:07:05.560
<v Speaker 1>top five in four games exactly.

0:07:05.640 --> 0:07:08.279
<v Speaker 2>Yes. And then you kind of look at all those quarterbacks.

0:07:08.480 --> 0:07:11.120
<v Speaker 3>They're all kind of like in the pocket or like

0:07:11.280 --> 0:07:14.000
<v Speaker 3>bad offense quarterbacks. Maybe with the exception of Herbert he

0:07:14.040 --> 0:07:16.280
<v Speaker 3>can run a little, but he's not known for.

0:07:16.240 --> 0:07:17.160
<v Speaker 2>His rushing ability.

0:07:17.600 --> 0:07:20.320
<v Speaker 3>And then you look at the quarterbacks inside the top

0:07:20.360 --> 0:07:23.720
<v Speaker 3>five quarterbacks one through five. Patrick Mahomes he had seven.

0:07:23.760 --> 0:07:25.920
<v Speaker 3>He also had six more times where he was six,

0:07:26.320 --> 0:07:28.480
<v Speaker 3>so he kind of had almost top six thirteen times,

0:07:28.480 --> 0:07:31.200
<v Speaker 3>which is crazy. And then we had Josh Allen who

0:07:31.280 --> 0:07:35.240
<v Speaker 3>had eleven, Jalen Hurts eleven, Joe Burrow six, and Justin

0:07:35.240 --> 0:07:37.760
<v Speaker 3>Fields five. And all those quarterbacks are either like the

0:07:37.800 --> 0:07:40.239
<v Speaker 3>best pocket patches in the league or they have rushing

0:07:40.320 --> 0:07:41.120
<v Speaker 3>rushing ability.

0:07:41.240 --> 0:07:42.840
<v Speaker 1>So that's what Goff doesn't give you, and that's why

0:07:42.920 --> 0:07:45.320
<v Speaker 1>we're bored by him, exactly, And he doesn't give you

0:07:45.560 --> 0:07:48.520
<v Speaker 1>big upside the kind of league's perfect for Jared Goff.

0:07:48.600 --> 0:07:51.080
<v Speaker 1>Is a guillotine league, oh for sure. You know, we

0:07:51.120 --> 0:07:53.480
<v Speaker 1>don't need the upside. I don't need to finish first

0:07:53.520 --> 0:07:55.600
<v Speaker 1>in a guillotine league. I just need to not be last.

0:07:55.800 --> 0:07:58.400
<v Speaker 1>And I need somebody's gonna consistently score points. And that's

0:07:58.400 --> 0:08:01.400
<v Speaker 1>what Jared Goff didlast year, and that's presumably what he'll

0:08:01.400 --> 0:08:03.280
<v Speaker 1>do this year, you know, aided by a very good

0:08:03.280 --> 0:08:06.000
<v Speaker 1>offensive line, which helps a lot. Although I went back

0:08:06.040 --> 0:08:10.040
<v Speaker 1>to their PFF rankings. As a pass blocking unit, Lin's

0:08:10.120 --> 0:08:11.560
<v Speaker 1>ranked I believe twenty first.

0:08:11.760 --> 0:08:12.920
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, I think that shocked me.

0:08:13.000 --> 0:08:14.480
<v Speaker 3>I think I saw that too, But then I kind

0:08:14.480 --> 0:08:16.360
<v Speaker 3>of dug into like some of the other stats. So

0:08:16.440 --> 0:08:20.200
<v Speaker 3>Golf was actually sacked a second least of any quarterback

0:08:20.240 --> 0:08:22.920
<v Speaker 3>with fourteen plus games played. The only guy below him

0:08:22.960 --> 0:08:24.880
<v Speaker 3>was Tom Brady, who just does not want to get touched.

0:08:24.880 --> 0:08:27.400
<v Speaker 2>He's gonna throw away, so so good stat for that.

0:08:27.480 --> 0:08:30.520
<v Speaker 3>And then it was only pressured on nineteen percent of throws,

0:08:30.600 --> 0:08:34.120
<v Speaker 3>which was ninth best among quarterbacks with fourteen plus games played.

0:08:34.160 --> 0:08:35.520
<v Speaker 2>So two good stats for him there.

0:08:35.559 --> 0:08:37.240
<v Speaker 3>In terms of the offensive line, I mean, we know

0:08:37.360 --> 0:08:40.520
<v Speaker 3>the guys on the offensive line are just they're good guys.

0:08:40.559 --> 0:08:43.160
<v Speaker 3>So I feel confident about then I feel confident about

0:08:43.160 --> 0:08:44.840
<v Speaker 3>the skill guys. We got a mon Ra and you

0:08:44.880 --> 0:08:48.359
<v Speaker 3>got those two headed running back of Swift and Montgomery.

0:08:48.400 --> 0:08:50.400
<v Speaker 3>We both said on the pass micro that we think

0:08:50.440 --> 0:08:53.240
<v Speaker 3>Montgomery is going to be better than Jamal Williams. And

0:08:53.280 --> 0:08:55.920
<v Speaker 3>then the Marvin Jones signing for them could be huge

0:08:55.920 --> 0:08:58.360
<v Speaker 3>considering Jamison. That's probably why they brought him in because

0:08:58.400 --> 0:09:00.240
<v Speaker 3>they know Jamison was going to be out six, so

0:09:00.280 --> 0:09:01.160
<v Speaker 3>they brought it Martin Jones.

0:09:01.200 --> 0:09:03.440
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, maybe they've known for a while. That could be true.

0:09:03.559 --> 0:09:06.400
<v Speaker 1>It could be true. All right, So GoF from a

0:09:06.440 --> 0:09:10.040
<v Speaker 1>dynasty perspective, he's never going to be a sexy dynasty guy.

0:09:10.160 --> 0:09:13.040
<v Speaker 1>He's now old er. He's not old, but he's now

0:09:13.080 --> 0:09:15.360
<v Speaker 1>an older quarterback. But he's still got like five six

0:09:15.400 --> 0:09:18.760
<v Speaker 1>good years left in him. Ideally, in my superflex, i'd

0:09:18.800 --> 0:09:21.320
<v Speaker 1>like to have him and then some high upside rushing

0:09:21.360 --> 0:09:23.559
<v Speaker 1>guy as a you know, I'd love to have him

0:09:23.720 --> 0:09:27.000
<v Speaker 1>as my safety quarterback that I start every week. And

0:09:27.040 --> 0:09:29.920
<v Speaker 1>then I've got my Justin Fields as a high upside,

0:09:29.960 --> 0:09:32.959
<v Speaker 1>high downside kind of guy as my other quarterback. That

0:09:33.000 --> 0:09:35.440
<v Speaker 1>would be That may be my ideal pairing for those two,

0:09:36.000 --> 0:09:39.280
<v Speaker 1>let's talk. Let's talk ADP for Jared Goff currently going

0:09:39.280 --> 0:09:40.600
<v Speaker 1>off the board. It's quarterback fifteen.

0:09:40.920 --> 0:09:42.280
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, so let's play the game. This is now.

0:09:42.280 --> 0:09:43.760
<v Speaker 3>It's gonna be a very fun game because all of

0:09:43.760 --> 0:09:45.679
<v Speaker 3>these guys kind of have their like following and who

0:09:45.720 --> 0:09:46.640
<v Speaker 3>they think is going to be good.

0:09:46.640 --> 0:09:49.600
<v Speaker 2>So let's start off with Dak Prescott at QB ten.

0:09:49.840 --> 0:09:51.480
<v Speaker 1>Am I subtracting for interceptions?

0:09:52.760 --> 0:09:53.080
<v Speaker 2>Yes?

0:09:53.440 --> 0:09:55.480
<v Speaker 1>Well, then I can't take Prescott here if I'm subtracting

0:09:55.480 --> 0:09:59.480
<v Speaker 1>for interceptions. Guys, tits too many picks and you know, granted,

0:10:00.360 --> 0:10:03.200
<v Speaker 1>it's not like he has four pick games, and maybe

0:10:03.200 --> 0:10:06.000
<v Speaker 1>it's just a lot of just dumb but high bad

0:10:06.080 --> 0:10:08.960
<v Speaker 1>spots for his picks. I hate that stuff. So I

0:10:09.040 --> 0:10:11.600
<v Speaker 1>might go golf over Prescott just to play it, just

0:10:11.640 --> 0:10:13.640
<v Speaker 1>to play it safe. Yeah, I might.

0:10:13.840 --> 0:10:16.840
<v Speaker 3>Okay, Okay, Daniel Jones a little bit more rushing upside

0:10:16.920 --> 0:10:17.600
<v Speaker 3>QB twelve.

0:10:19.320 --> 0:10:21.760
<v Speaker 1>I take Jones for the rushing upside. I get the

0:10:21.800 --> 0:10:24.040
<v Speaker 1>quarterback who ran for the fourth most yards last year,

0:10:24.120 --> 0:10:27.640
<v Speaker 1>and the passing can only get better, right, it can

0:10:27.760 --> 0:10:31.000
<v Speaker 1>only get better, has to Yeah, Darren Waller Loan makes

0:10:31.000 --> 0:10:31.840
<v Speaker 1>that offense better?

0:10:32.160 --> 0:10:34.120
<v Speaker 2>Is Darren Waller going to stay on the field. Let's

0:10:34.120 --> 0:10:37.760
<v Speaker 2>hope so, all right. Kirk Cousins QB thirteen.

0:10:39.760 --> 0:10:44.880
<v Speaker 1>Always Belieguered Kirk Cousins. I think Cousins was better last

0:10:44.960 --> 0:10:46.800
<v Speaker 1>year than Golf. I'm taking Cousins, that's fair.

0:10:46.880 --> 0:10:48.360
<v Speaker 2>No, I agree that he was better at last year.

0:10:48.360 --> 0:10:49.880
<v Speaker 3>Do you think Kirk Cousins is still on the Vikings

0:10:49.880 --> 0:10:51.319
<v Speaker 3>this season going to San Francisco?

0:10:51.440 --> 0:10:51.680
<v Speaker 2>Maybe.

0:10:52.280 --> 0:10:54.000
<v Speaker 1>I don't think he is going to go to San Francisco,

0:10:54.040 --> 0:10:58.200
<v Speaker 1>but Vikings do have a chance to invest a serious

0:10:58.240 --> 0:10:58.959
<v Speaker 1>pick at quarterback.

0:10:59.000 --> 0:10:59.160
<v Speaker 2>Yeah.

0:10:59.160 --> 0:11:01.440
<v Speaker 3>I feel like the Kirk Cousins the San Francisco trade

0:11:01.440 --> 0:11:03.000
<v Speaker 3>has been talked about for three years.

0:11:03.440 --> 0:11:05.200
<v Speaker 1>It hasn't happened yet. I'm not buying it's gonna happen.

0:11:05.240 --> 0:11:05.320
<v Speaker 2>Now.

0:11:05.600 --> 0:11:07.280
<v Speaker 1>They got Rock Perdy who looked great.

0:11:07.600 --> 0:11:09.520
<v Speaker 3>They're not gonna give They're not given anything, and they

0:11:09.520 --> 0:11:10.760
<v Speaker 3>have Sam Darnold who looked great.

0:11:10.800 --> 0:11:12.760
<v Speaker 1>The people that are pushing the Kirk Cousins in San

0:11:12.760 --> 0:11:16.640
<v Speaker 1>Francisco narrative are the many many Viking fans that want

0:11:16.720 --> 0:11:17.280
<v Speaker 1>him out of town.

0:11:17.440 --> 0:11:17.640
<v Speaker 2>Yeah.

0:11:17.679 --> 0:11:18.920
<v Speaker 3>I don't think he'll be on the Rock. I don't

0:11:18.920 --> 0:11:20.959
<v Speaker 3>think he'll be the starting quarterback going into next season.

0:11:20.960 --> 0:11:21.960
<v Speaker 2>I think he's gone Vikings.

0:11:22.040 --> 0:11:23.800
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, yeah, this is the this is last year here.

0:11:23.920 --> 0:11:26.320
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, all right, Aaron Rodgers QB fifteen.

0:11:28.720 --> 0:11:30.400
<v Speaker 1>Man, if you knew for sure he's gonna be with

0:11:30.400 --> 0:11:32.079
<v Speaker 1>the Jets, which I think you will, let's just assume,

0:11:32.920 --> 0:11:37.960
<v Speaker 1>you know. I just the receiving weapons are so open up,

0:11:38.000 --> 0:11:41.240
<v Speaker 1>so many possibilities for Rodgers. But man, there's a lot

0:11:41.240 --> 0:11:43.960
<v Speaker 1>of weirdness there. I'm I'm out on Rodgers. He looked bad.

0:11:44.080 --> 0:11:45.960
<v Speaker 1>Now granted he had the broken thumb or whatever, the

0:11:46.040 --> 0:11:50.560
<v Speaker 1>thumb injury, but that those passes looked way wrong last year.

0:11:50.640 --> 0:11:52.680
<v Speaker 1>I'm out. I'm not taking Rodgers. I'll take Jared Goff.

0:11:52.720 --> 0:11:54.679
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, I'm in on golf too. On at that price

0:11:54.679 --> 0:11:57.160
<v Speaker 2>for Rodgers. And then Gino Smith.

0:11:57.200 --> 0:12:00.560
<v Speaker 3>QB sixteen and he finishes like the could be like

0:12:00.600 --> 0:12:02.160
<v Speaker 3>eight or something, right, Yeah.

0:12:01.920 --> 0:12:04.040
<v Speaker 2>And he's kind of going down lower again.

0:12:04.040 --> 0:12:06.040
<v Speaker 1>You gotta do him one of these times, you know, Smith,

0:12:06.760 --> 0:12:09.000
<v Speaker 1>Let's do that. I come back story is incredible, It

0:12:09.080 --> 0:12:13.240
<v Speaker 1>is incredible. Yeah, I totally improbable. I think I go

0:12:13.320 --> 0:12:15.400
<v Speaker 1>Geno Smith. You get a little bit of rushing, not

0:12:15.440 --> 0:12:17.120
<v Speaker 1>a lot. You get a little bit of rushing in there.

0:12:17.480 --> 0:12:21.000
<v Speaker 1>You got two great receivers they'll Yeah, I think I

0:12:21.240 --> 0:12:23.240
<v Speaker 1>think I'd go Gino Smith. He was probably he was

0:12:23.280 --> 0:12:24.200
<v Speaker 1>better than Golf last year.

0:12:24.240 --> 0:12:25.760
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, I'm going with Geno on that too. I think

0:12:25.800 --> 0:12:27.719
<v Speaker 3>just because they have his d K and Lockett and

0:12:27.720 --> 0:12:29.439
<v Speaker 3>they might draw somebody this year too. He's got Kenneth

0:12:29.440 --> 0:12:31.080
<v Speaker 3>Walker in a great wrong game kind of the same,

0:12:31.320 --> 0:12:33.520
<v Speaker 3>very similar situation that Goff is with the Lions, but

0:12:34.679 --> 0:12:36.360
<v Speaker 3>some at Geno Smith. He's on a one year deal too,

0:12:36.360 --> 0:12:37.600
<v Speaker 3>pretty much. I mean, I know he's on a three

0:12:37.640 --> 0:12:39.840
<v Speaker 3>year deal, but it's pretty much a one year deal. Yeah,

0:12:40.280 --> 0:12:41.880
<v Speaker 3>you'll get all the guaranteed money in the cap it.

0:12:41.880 --> 0:12:42.679
<v Speaker 3>He's on a one year deal.

0:12:43.160 --> 0:12:44.760
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, but which I wish he could have, you know,

0:12:44.800 --> 0:12:46.560
<v Speaker 1>for his sake, I wish he could have cashed that

0:12:46.679 --> 0:12:49.760
<v Speaker 1>in for something a little better. But yeah, Seahawks are

0:12:49.840 --> 0:12:53.720
<v Speaker 1>a sneaky team to go quarterback at the pick they

0:12:53.720 --> 0:12:56.720
<v Speaker 1>got Denver's page. I picked six right. That's a sneaky

0:12:56.800 --> 0:12:58.920
<v Speaker 1>landing spot for a quarterback right there, and then they

0:12:58.920 --> 0:12:59.760
<v Speaker 1>invest in the future.

0:12:59.880 --> 0:13:03.200
<v Speaker 2>I am totally on board for the Richardson to Richardson Seattle.

0:13:03.320 --> 0:13:06.000
<v Speaker 1>I know me too too. That would be great for

0:13:06.040 --> 0:13:09.040
<v Speaker 1>the Seahawks. All right, great job, thanks for listening, everybody.

0:13:09.080 --> 0:13:12.400
<v Speaker 1>Another Fantasy Football Weekly Micro edition coming up tomorrow