1 00:00:00,200 --> 00:00:03,360 Speaker 1: Hey, they're aud Loots listeners. It's Tracy Alloway. 2 00:00:03,000 --> 00:00:04,000 Speaker 2: And Jill Wisenthal. 3 00:00:04,280 --> 00:00:07,720 Speaker 1: We are very excited to announce that Audlots is going 4 00:00:07,800 --> 00:00:09,680 Speaker 1: to Washington That's right. 5 00:00:09,760 --> 00:00:11,560 Speaker 2: For the first time, we are going to do a 6 00:00:11,640 --> 00:00:16,439 Speaker 2: live public Odd Lots recording in our nation's capital. That's 7 00:00:16,440 --> 00:00:19,680 Speaker 2: going to be March twelfth in Washington, DC at the 8 00:00:19,760 --> 00:00:23,560 Speaker 2: Miracle Theater and guests will be announced in the coming days, 9 00:00:23,600 --> 00:00:25,960 Speaker 2: but in the meantime you can find a ticket link 10 00:00:26,000 --> 00:00:28,040 Speaker 2: at Bloomberg dot com, slash odd. 11 00:00:27,800 --> 00:00:45,320 Speaker 3: Lots, Bloomberg Audio Studios, Podcasts, Radio News. 12 00:00:46,920 --> 00:00:50,600 Speaker 2: Hello and welcome to another episode of the Odd Lots podcast. 13 00:00:50,760 --> 00:00:53,199 Speaker 1: I'm Jill Wisenthal and I'm Tracy Alloway. 14 00:00:53,320 --> 00:00:57,480 Speaker 2: Tracy, let's get back on the supply chain, shipping and 15 00:00:57,600 --> 00:00:58,639 Speaker 2: industrial policy. 16 00:00:58,680 --> 00:00:58,840 Speaker 4: Bee. 17 00:00:59,120 --> 00:00:59,720 Speaker 5: I love it. 18 00:01:00,040 --> 00:01:01,880 Speaker 1: I've been waiting for us to get back on that. 19 00:01:02,360 --> 00:01:06,080 Speaker 1: Although actually, okay, so I'm excited about this for two reasons. 20 00:01:06,280 --> 00:01:10,319 Speaker 1: One is I enjoy talking about supply chains and talking 21 00:01:10,360 --> 00:01:13,160 Speaker 1: about how goods are actually transported. And I think I've 22 00:01:13,160 --> 00:01:16,039 Speaker 1: told you before, I actually wanted to be a commodities 23 00:01:16,080 --> 00:01:19,920 Speaker 1: reporter because like there's this element of romanticism to shipping 24 00:01:20,080 --> 00:01:24,600 Speaker 1: actual things moving actual stuff around the world. But then secondly, 25 00:01:24,760 --> 00:01:27,679 Speaker 1: the reason I'm excited for this conversation is because this 26 00:01:27,800 --> 00:01:32,040 Speaker 1: is a rare example or instance of something that has 27 00:01:32,120 --> 00:01:33,400 Speaker 1: bipartisan support. 28 00:01:33,840 --> 00:01:37,560 Speaker 2: Yes, that's right. And so obviously during the last administration 29 00:01:37,720 --> 00:01:40,400 Speaker 2: we saw these things. Do is the Chips Act, do 30 00:01:40,560 --> 00:01:44,559 Speaker 2: is the Inflation Reduction Act, which primarily focused on energy, 31 00:01:44,600 --> 00:01:48,240 Speaker 2: a lot of alternative energy. There's been some question obviously, 32 00:01:48,360 --> 00:01:51,200 Speaker 2: with the changing of the guard in DC, are we 33 00:01:51,280 --> 00:01:54,400 Speaker 2: going to see some more like activist efforts to shore 34 00:01:54,520 --> 00:01:59,640 Speaker 2: up certain aspects of the US industrial capacity. There's a 35 00:01:59,640 --> 00:02:02,120 Speaker 2: lot of anxiety about that right now, but you know, 36 00:02:02,160 --> 00:02:05,480 Speaker 2: it's obviously an open question where that's going to go. 37 00:02:05,880 --> 00:02:07,480 Speaker 2: But one of the things that has come up in 38 00:02:07,520 --> 00:02:10,320 Speaker 2: some of our conversations that we haven't dived too deep 39 00:02:10,360 --> 00:02:14,440 Speaker 2: into it is American maritime capacity specifically, and it comes 40 00:02:14,520 --> 00:02:16,839 Speaker 2: up when we reference the Jones Act, and it comes 41 00:02:16,919 --> 00:02:20,359 Speaker 2: up when we talk about port automation, and we've talked 42 00:02:20,400 --> 00:02:23,080 Speaker 2: a little bit about icebreakers and things like that, and 43 00:02:23,120 --> 00:02:27,680 Speaker 2: how sort of atrophied US capacity has become. And so 44 00:02:27,760 --> 00:02:30,680 Speaker 2: then there's this question, like, you know, a what can 45 00:02:30,720 --> 00:02:33,200 Speaker 2: we do about it and be how urgent is there 46 00:02:33,360 --> 00:02:35,120 Speaker 2: a reason to rebuild this capacity. 47 00:02:35,320 --> 00:02:37,240 Speaker 1: I was kind of wondering how long it would take 48 00:02:37,280 --> 00:02:39,600 Speaker 1: for us to bring up the Genes Act in this conversation, 49 00:02:39,680 --> 00:02:43,000 Speaker 1: and the answer is about one or two minutes. But 50 00:02:43,120 --> 00:02:45,440 Speaker 1: I think this is it's a really interesting topic. From 51 00:02:45,480 --> 00:02:48,640 Speaker 1: an all blots perspective. We have done shipping episodes in 52 00:02:48,680 --> 00:02:51,480 Speaker 1: the past, and obviously everyone learned during the pandemic that 53 00:02:51,600 --> 00:02:55,680 Speaker 1: shipping costs are really important. But also I'm just interested 54 00:02:55,840 --> 00:02:59,399 Speaker 1: in this discussion from a sort of policy design perspective. 55 00:02:59,680 --> 00:03:03,160 Speaker 1: How do you go about actually designing something like this 56 00:03:03,360 --> 00:03:07,680 Speaker 1: that at first clients seems absolutely sprawling and complicated and 57 00:03:07,760 --> 00:03:09,480 Speaker 1: touching on all these different things. 58 00:03:09,720 --> 00:03:12,600 Speaker 2: Well, I'm excited to say we really do have the 59 00:03:12,720 --> 00:03:16,400 Speaker 2: two perfect guests for this conversation. We're going to be 60 00:03:16,440 --> 00:03:21,000 Speaker 2: speaking with Republican Senator Todd Young from Indiana and Democratic 61 00:03:21,080 --> 00:03:25,640 Speaker 2: Senator Mark Kelly from Arizona. Senator Kelly is a trained 62 00:03:25,760 --> 00:03:28,960 Speaker 2: merchant Marine. I see a class of eighty six the 63 00:03:29,000 --> 00:03:33,320 Speaker 2: Merchant Marine Academy. So, like I said, truly the perfect guests. 64 00:03:33,600 --> 00:03:36,400 Speaker 2: Senators Kelly and Young, thank you so much for coming 65 00:03:36,400 --> 00:03:37,080 Speaker 2: on Outlaws. 66 00:03:38,440 --> 00:03:39,320 Speaker 6: Thanks for having us. 67 00:03:39,560 --> 00:03:41,600 Speaker 4: Yeah, thank you. Joe and Tracy for having us on. 68 00:03:42,320 --> 00:03:45,360 Speaker 2: Why don't we just start what do you describe one 69 00:03:45,360 --> 00:03:48,880 Speaker 2: of you or both of you describe the existing state 70 00:03:49,000 --> 00:03:53,480 Speaker 2: of America's maritime capacity, and just like why it's something 71 00:03:53,520 --> 00:03:57,560 Speaker 2: that we need to in your views address it. 72 00:03:57,720 --> 00:03:59,960 Speaker 7: Joe, this is Mark Kelly. You know, just to start, 73 00:04:00,200 --> 00:04:04,440 Speaker 7: I would say, big picture, the state of our maritime 74 00:04:04,480 --> 00:04:08,320 Speaker 7: industry is really, really poor. I was in a brief 75 00:04:08,520 --> 00:04:12,760 Speaker 7: just yesterday with the Admiral, the four star admiral, Admiral Paparo, 76 00:04:13,400 --> 00:04:16,599 Speaker 7: who's the head of Indopaycom, and we're talking about the 77 00:04:16,600 --> 00:04:20,160 Speaker 7: Western Pacific, and he was talking about the Military Sealift 78 00:04:20,160 --> 00:04:24,800 Speaker 7: Command and how it is in bad shape materially and 79 00:04:24,880 --> 00:04:26,640 Speaker 7: also from a workforce perspective. 80 00:04:27,440 --> 00:04:30,360 Speaker 4: But when you consider where. 81 00:04:30,080 --> 00:04:33,000 Speaker 7: We were and where we are today. So when I 82 00:04:33,120 --> 00:04:35,880 Speaker 7: graduated from the US Merchantary Academy in nineteen eighty six, 83 00:04:35,960 --> 00:04:39,599 Speaker 7: as you mentioned, made about four hundred US flagged ocean 84 00:04:39,640 --> 00:04:42,599 Speaker 7: going vessels, and that was down, by the way, from. 85 00:04:42,640 --> 00:04:44,720 Speaker 4: Thousands after World War Two. 86 00:04:45,240 --> 00:04:49,760 Speaker 7: Today that number has fallen to eighty, so eighty US 87 00:04:49,880 --> 00:04:55,800 Speaker 7: flag vessels in international commerce flying the US flag. China, 88 00:04:56,680 --> 00:05:00,880 Speaker 7: you know, our peer or near peer adversary has five 89 00:05:01,000 --> 00:05:05,120 Speaker 7: thousand five hundred and most of the cargo that comes 90 00:05:05,400 --> 00:05:07,800 Speaker 7: to the United States can come on Chinese ships. So 91 00:05:08,680 --> 00:05:11,320 Speaker 7: if you remember what happened in twenty twenty one twenty 92 00:05:11,320 --> 00:05:15,640 Speaker 7: twenty two is supply chains and bottleneck at seaports, especially 93 00:05:15,640 --> 00:05:18,040 Speaker 7: on the West Coast. I mean, if China wants to 94 00:05:18,080 --> 00:05:22,360 Speaker 7: do that similar effect to US, they can. 95 00:05:22,920 --> 00:05:26,800 Speaker 4: On any day, President she could. 96 00:05:26,520 --> 00:05:30,760 Speaker 7: Say, hey, no Chinese ships take cargo to the United 97 00:05:30,800 --> 00:05:33,560 Speaker 7: States anymore, and it would essentially shut down our economy. 98 00:05:33,640 --> 00:05:36,839 Speaker 7: So this is a problem. It's a national security problem. 99 00:05:36,880 --> 00:05:37,640 Speaker 7: We got to fix it. 100 00:05:38,760 --> 00:05:40,040 Speaker 5: So how did this happen? 101 00:05:40,200 --> 00:05:44,000 Speaker 1: I mean, eighty US flagged vessels versus five thousand, five 102 00:05:44,080 --> 00:05:48,680 Speaker 1: hundred out of China is pretty stunning statistic. What are 103 00:05:48,720 --> 00:05:51,680 Speaker 1: the things that went into making I guess the US 104 00:05:51,800 --> 00:05:53,880 Speaker 1: less competitive when it comes to shipbuilding? 105 00:05:54,279 --> 00:05:55,479 Speaker 7: God, I don't know if you want to take that 106 00:05:55,600 --> 00:05:59,680 Speaker 7: or I could kin, yeah, I'll speak at a high level. 107 00:06:00,000 --> 00:06:03,800 Speaker 6: I mean, what we have seen over the years is China, 108 00:06:03,839 --> 00:06:08,159 Speaker 6: in a number of different sectors of the economy, they've 109 00:06:08,200 --> 00:06:14,080 Speaker 6: subsidized their activities in furtherance of national security and domestic 110 00:06:14,200 --> 00:06:21,080 Speaker 6: job creation and to master certain technologies and crafts so 111 00:06:21,120 --> 00:06:27,039 Speaker 6: that they can leverage those for geopolitical purposes and also 112 00:06:27,360 --> 00:06:32,719 Speaker 6: for commercial purposes to put other industries and other countries 113 00:06:32,760 --> 00:06:37,480 Speaker 6: out of business. So examples, one example would be semiconductors, 114 00:06:37,920 --> 00:06:40,920 Speaker 6: and it's not just the Chinese, many other Asian nations 115 00:06:41,120 --> 00:06:45,560 Speaker 6: understood back You could point to the nineteen eighties. They 116 00:06:45,640 --> 00:06:51,239 Speaker 6: understood that having some measure of control and expertise over 117 00:06:51,279 --> 00:06:57,040 Speaker 6: semiconductor technologies was important to their growth and also important 118 00:06:57,160 --> 00:07:02,239 Speaker 6: to their military using these technologygies, embedding them in different 119 00:07:02,360 --> 00:07:07,680 Speaker 6: military platforms, and so they invested in them. We instead, 120 00:07:07,760 --> 00:07:11,120 Speaker 6: we have a more efficient economic model that doesn't lead 121 00:07:11,200 --> 00:07:14,760 Speaker 6: to the sort of over investment and waste by our 122 00:07:14,800 --> 00:07:19,960 Speaker 6: capital markets and others that the Chinese do. We also 123 00:07:20,120 --> 00:07:25,280 Speaker 6: don't look at economic exchanges historically through a military lens. 124 00:07:25,720 --> 00:07:25,880 Speaker 4: Well. 125 00:07:25,880 --> 00:07:29,440 Speaker 6: The disadvantage of that is when other countries are subsidizing 126 00:07:29,480 --> 00:07:34,000 Speaker 6: their businesses, in this case shipbuilding, and we're not subsidizing, 127 00:07:34,120 --> 00:07:38,440 Speaker 6: they will undercut us on price, and given enough practice, 128 00:07:38,920 --> 00:07:43,200 Speaker 6: sometimes undercut us on quality. So we have gotten out 129 00:07:43,240 --> 00:07:46,520 Speaker 6: of the business, in the case of semiconductors, of making them, 130 00:07:46,560 --> 00:07:50,080 Speaker 6: and over time we became vulnerable the interruptions in the 131 00:07:50,120 --> 00:07:54,840 Speaker 6: supply chain, the interruption that we might experience in shipbuilding 132 00:07:55,080 --> 00:07:58,440 Speaker 6: our maritime industry that Mark just alluded to is one 133 00:07:58,480 --> 00:08:01,800 Speaker 6: we're trying to prevent. We don't want a situation, whether 134 00:08:01,840 --> 00:08:07,480 Speaker 6: it's a pandemic or a military conflict, in which we 135 00:08:07,840 --> 00:08:13,600 Speaker 6: are dependent on our chief adversary, China to move materiel 136 00:08:13,800 --> 00:08:17,080 Speaker 6: and personnel to other places, and on a day to 137 00:08:17,160 --> 00:08:21,240 Speaker 6: day basis, as our government leaders are making foreign policy, 138 00:08:22,000 --> 00:08:25,320 Speaker 6: we don't want to be coerced into making certain decisions 139 00:08:25,360 --> 00:08:29,080 Speaker 6: by the mere threat of Chinese interruption of our economy. 140 00:08:29,160 --> 00:08:31,920 Speaker 6: So that's why, at the highest level this is very 141 00:08:31,960 --> 00:08:36,640 Speaker 6: important and why some sort of government intervention is needed 142 00:08:36,640 --> 00:08:39,280 Speaker 6: because this, in the end is an economic security issue 143 00:08:39,520 --> 00:08:41,520 Speaker 6: and also a national security issue. 144 00:08:42,040 --> 00:08:45,720 Speaker 7: And Tracy to add on to that just a little, 145 00:08:45,880 --> 00:08:47,880 Speaker 7: in the nineteen eighties, we used to do this differently, 146 00:08:48,000 --> 00:08:51,680 Speaker 7: and before there was some more government involvement. We got 147 00:08:51,720 --> 00:08:55,640 Speaker 7: out of that kind of left the maritime industry totally 148 00:08:55,679 --> 00:08:58,080 Speaker 7: on its own, and it just decayed. 149 00:08:58,440 --> 00:09:01,480 Speaker 4: Over decades for the last forty years. 150 00:09:02,440 --> 00:09:06,800 Speaker 7: And you know, the other concern here about you know, 151 00:09:06,840 --> 00:09:10,320 Speaker 7: it's not only the number of ships, but you know, 152 00:09:10,360 --> 00:09:13,680 Speaker 7: the Chinese ships, the ocean going their ocean going vessels 153 00:09:13,760 --> 00:09:19,360 Speaker 7: fifty five hundred or so that they have requirements put 154 00:09:19,400 --> 00:09:20,720 Speaker 7: on them by the PLA Navy. 155 00:09:21,360 --> 00:09:24,440 Speaker 4: So these ships are you know. 156 00:09:24,440 --> 00:09:29,439 Speaker 7: Well equipped and configured to be what they need if 157 00:09:29,480 --> 00:09:32,160 Speaker 7: they were in a conflict with US. Now, we rely 158 00:09:32,400 --> 00:09:38,600 Speaker 7: on the Military Sealift Command for our initial capacity to 159 00:09:38,679 --> 00:09:44,160 Speaker 7: move combat equipment and troops in some cases troops overseas, but. 160 00:09:44,200 --> 00:09:45,640 Speaker 4: Those numbers are rather limited. 161 00:09:46,520 --> 00:09:49,240 Speaker 7: And the reason why you want a large maritime fleet 162 00:09:49,320 --> 00:09:52,880 Speaker 7: is not only you know, peace time to move you know, cargo, 163 00:09:53,080 --> 00:09:57,040 Speaker 7: and it's healthy for our economy and it also helps 164 00:09:57,320 --> 00:10:01,080 Speaker 7: us shipbuilding. But the other reason, as in time of conflict, 165 00:10:01,120 --> 00:10:05,560 Speaker 7: we might have to rely on this capacity of ocean 166 00:10:05,600 --> 00:10:09,720 Speaker 7: going merchant vessels to get combat power across the Pacific 167 00:10:09,880 --> 00:10:10,480 Speaker 7: or Atlantic. 168 00:10:10,679 --> 00:10:13,800 Speaker 6: Sorry, I was just going to build on Mark's point 169 00:10:13,960 --> 00:10:18,199 Speaker 6: and emphasize the capacity that Mark just alluded to. Is 170 00:10:18,440 --> 00:10:20,160 Speaker 6: what we're essentially trying to do is we're trying to 171 00:10:20,200 --> 00:10:24,720 Speaker 6: train more mariners, build more ships, and then create more 172 00:10:24,840 --> 00:10:29,559 Speaker 6: yard space in our existing yards and perhaps some older 173 00:10:29,640 --> 00:10:32,560 Speaker 6: yards that need to be refurbished, create more yard space 174 00:10:32,640 --> 00:10:38,680 Speaker 6: that can support additional military shipbuilding and repair during a 175 00:10:38,720 --> 00:10:51,000 Speaker 6: wartime situation. 176 00:10:56,000 --> 00:10:59,160 Speaker 2: It's interesting, you know, we're having this bipartisan conversation, and 177 00:10:59,200 --> 00:11:01,360 Speaker 2: you laid it out the sort of tension very well, 178 00:11:01,400 --> 00:11:05,160 Speaker 2: which is that sort of American economic philosophy has been 179 00:11:05,200 --> 00:11:09,600 Speaker 2: optimized for efficiency and profit. And obviously we're extraordinarily wealthy 180 00:11:09,640 --> 00:11:13,280 Speaker 2: as a country, probably enlarge part of that. But A 181 00:11:13,559 --> 00:11:18,679 Speaker 2: there's the geopolitical risks that emerge with losing basically the 182 00:11:18,720 --> 00:11:21,720 Speaker 2: ability to build stuff, and you mentioned semiconductors and ships, 183 00:11:21,760 --> 00:11:24,240 Speaker 2: and there's a lot of this and so A, you know, 184 00:11:24,480 --> 00:11:27,000 Speaker 2: you run the risk it's overseas, and then over time 185 00:11:27,360 --> 00:11:30,040 Speaker 2: perhaps they don't even need the subsidies anymore because they 186 00:11:30,080 --> 00:11:32,720 Speaker 2: just have years and years and years of practice getting 187 00:11:32,840 --> 00:11:36,120 Speaker 2: better and better at it. Do you see this sort 188 00:11:36,160 --> 00:11:39,760 Speaker 2: of framework, this sort of lens with which to view 189 00:11:39,840 --> 00:11:44,679 Speaker 2: economic policy is fundamentally changing in DC because we're trying 190 00:11:44,679 --> 00:11:48,000 Speaker 2: to sort of understand, you know, how much momentum and 191 00:11:48,080 --> 00:11:52,200 Speaker 2: continuity there will be for just this general notion of 192 00:11:52,600 --> 00:11:54,400 Speaker 2: what people call industrial policy. 193 00:11:55,200 --> 00:11:59,720 Speaker 6: I do. I believe a lot of minds have been 194 00:11:59,800 --> 00:12:06,120 Speaker 6: changed changed, and policy makers pensient for embracing these sorts 195 00:12:06,120 --> 00:12:10,720 Speaker 6: of policies has fundamentally changed. Mark was helpful to me 196 00:12:11,200 --> 00:12:13,360 Speaker 6: as we tried to push through the Chips and Science 197 00:12:13,360 --> 00:12:17,000 Speaker 6: Act dealing with the semiconductor challenges, and I think through 198 00:12:17,080 --> 00:12:20,120 Speaker 6: that exercise, many of us had to make what were 199 00:12:20,400 --> 00:12:23,959 Speaker 6: challenging arguments to colleagues about why we needed to bake 200 00:12:24,080 --> 00:12:30,280 Speaker 6: in a national security premium to the price of certain products, 201 00:12:30,960 --> 00:12:34,000 Speaker 6: knowing that if we didn't make them here have the 202 00:12:34,040 --> 00:12:37,120 Speaker 6: capacity to make them here in the future, there would 203 00:12:37,160 --> 00:12:40,840 Speaker 6: be national security consequences to that. And we've done that 204 00:12:41,120 --> 00:12:44,880 Speaker 6: on so many other technology areas in the past. The 205 00:12:44,960 --> 00:12:48,440 Speaker 6: only difference now is that we have an adversary that 206 00:12:48,960 --> 00:12:52,400 Speaker 6: does not really look at any commercial transactions through a 207 00:12:52,520 --> 00:12:57,120 Speaker 6: purely commercial lens. There's always a geopolitical or military overlay 208 00:12:57,200 --> 00:13:00,319 Speaker 6: to it. So we have to extend the long standing 209 00:13:00,720 --> 00:13:04,080 Speaker 6: philosophy to other areas of our economy in order to 210 00:13:04,120 --> 00:13:09,439 Speaker 6: protect our people. So if we continue to make the arguments, 211 00:13:09,520 --> 00:13:12,280 Speaker 6: I think more people in Washington will embrace what most 212 00:13:12,320 --> 00:13:18,080 Speaker 6: people across America already intuitively understand, which is yes. I 213 00:13:18,200 --> 00:13:21,000 Speaker 6: remember during the global pandemic when I tried to get 214 00:13:21,000 --> 00:13:25,160 Speaker 6: at Walmart and buy a consumer electronic and the shelves 215 00:13:25,200 --> 00:13:28,840 Speaker 6: were half empty. They understood why that was and why 216 00:13:28,880 --> 00:13:32,720 Speaker 6: it's hard to run a modern economy without more resiliency 217 00:13:33,360 --> 00:13:36,440 Speaker 6: and a little more just in case instead of just 218 00:13:36,559 --> 00:13:37,160 Speaker 6: in time. 219 00:13:38,640 --> 00:13:40,600 Speaker 1: So one of the things that comes up quite a 220 00:13:40,600 --> 00:13:44,280 Speaker 1: lot on this show is the importance of institutional knowledge. So, 221 00:13:44,559 --> 00:13:47,520 Speaker 1: you know, you can have people in DC agree that 222 00:13:47,559 --> 00:13:51,240 Speaker 1: the US should build, you know, more big and complicated things, 223 00:13:51,320 --> 00:13:55,480 Speaker 1: whether those are semiconductors or ships, but you actually need 224 00:13:55,520 --> 00:13:57,640 Speaker 1: people who know how to do that. And if we 225 00:13:57,800 --> 00:14:01,320 Speaker 1: haven't been building these things for decades, then there probably 226 00:14:01,360 --> 00:14:04,320 Speaker 1: aren't that many people around who have practical knowledge or 227 00:14:04,400 --> 00:14:07,000 Speaker 1: experience of how to do this. And in fact, I 228 00:14:07,000 --> 00:14:10,760 Speaker 1: don't think there's any major shipbuilder that is actually headquartered 229 00:14:10,800 --> 00:14:14,080 Speaker 1: in the US, although there are some subsidiaries. How do 230 00:14:14,120 --> 00:14:18,840 Speaker 1: you actually go about building up institutional knowledge for shipbuilding? 231 00:14:19,840 --> 00:14:23,200 Speaker 7: Tracy So, one of my classmates from the US Merchant 232 00:14:23,200 --> 00:14:25,400 Speaker 7: Many Academy in nineteen eighty six is a woman named 233 00:14:25,560 --> 00:14:30,360 Speaker 7: Jennifer Boykin. She's the president of Newport News Shipbuilding, And 234 00:14:30,440 --> 00:14:32,720 Speaker 7: before I was in this job, I remember going down 235 00:14:32,760 --> 00:14:33,720 Speaker 7: there to visit her. 236 00:14:33,640 --> 00:14:36,200 Speaker 4: And talking about some of the workforce issues. 237 00:14:36,240 --> 00:14:41,360 Speaker 7: She builds aircraft carriers and Virginia Class submarines. You know, 238 00:14:41,560 --> 00:14:45,280 Speaker 7: one of the pre eminent shipbuilders in the world. When 239 00:14:45,280 --> 00:14:49,320 Speaker 7: you consider just the capability of these vessels, a US 240 00:14:49,400 --> 00:14:51,920 Speaker 7: aircraft carrier or the Ford class aircraft carrier and the 241 00:14:52,000 --> 00:14:56,120 Speaker 7: Virginia class attack submarines are you know, there's nothing better. 242 00:14:56,240 --> 00:15:01,440 Speaker 7: So we can build really, really good and capable ships. 243 00:15:02,040 --> 00:15:04,800 Speaker 7: But one of the challenges, you know, the chief faces 244 00:15:04,880 --> 00:15:07,960 Speaker 7: is what you're talking about, is the workforce, you know, 245 00:15:08,080 --> 00:15:11,160 Speaker 7: constantly trying to find people that will do these jobs 246 00:15:11,200 --> 00:15:13,520 Speaker 7: and do them well and have the skills. Now, they 247 00:15:13,560 --> 00:15:18,560 Speaker 7: train a lot of their own people welders and pipe fitters, electricians, 248 00:15:19,360 --> 00:15:25,960 Speaker 7: but they often run into challenges and finding, you know, 249 00:15:26,240 --> 00:15:29,400 Speaker 7: people to go into these jobs, and when they need 250 00:15:29,560 --> 00:15:35,000 Speaker 7: people that are trained already, that ecosystem of shipbuilders doesn't 251 00:15:35,040 --> 00:15:38,480 Speaker 7: really exist anymore in the United States. So part of 252 00:15:38,520 --> 00:15:41,920 Speaker 7: the benefit of this and in the legislation itself, is 253 00:15:41,960 --> 00:15:47,880 Speaker 7: a strategy to provide help for training programs so to 254 00:15:47,920 --> 00:15:50,880 Speaker 7: build the workforce. You can think of this as kind 255 00:15:50,880 --> 00:15:53,680 Speaker 7: of a three legged stool. One of them be in 256 00:15:53,720 --> 00:15:58,359 Speaker 7: the shipyards, one of them being the US flag the vessels, 257 00:15:58,440 --> 00:16:03,600 Speaker 7: and the third being the and by supporting the schools 258 00:16:03,720 --> 00:16:06,240 Speaker 7: like the US Merchant Marine Academy and the state Maritime 259 00:16:06,280 --> 00:16:10,520 Speaker 7: Academies and also the you know, the schools that train 260 00:16:10,840 --> 00:16:17,160 Speaker 7: the unlicensed mariners, but then also programs to you know, 261 00:16:17,280 --> 00:16:23,000 Speaker 7: help shipyards find pipe fitters and train them, and welders 262 00:16:23,040 --> 00:16:28,280 Speaker 7: and electricians and all those trades will then grow this 263 00:16:28,600 --> 00:16:33,800 Speaker 7: entire ecosystem. So there's extra capacity of a workforce that 264 00:16:33,960 --> 00:16:37,720 Speaker 7: existing shipbuilders that build naval combatants can rely on. 265 00:16:38,400 --> 00:16:39,920 Speaker 4: And then that extends not only. 266 00:16:39,760 --> 00:16:43,480 Speaker 7: To the workforce, but to the companies that build the parts, 267 00:16:43,640 --> 00:16:48,120 Speaker 7: you know, pumps and pipes. If you grow that, there's 268 00:16:48,200 --> 00:16:52,960 Speaker 7: a more competitive economic environment, there's more availability in some 269 00:16:53,120 --> 00:16:57,920 Speaker 7: cases now when when they're buying, you know, a pump 270 00:16:58,040 --> 00:17:01,160 Speaker 7: or pipes, they might have only one or two vendors 271 00:17:01,200 --> 00:17:04,879 Speaker 7: that they can rely on. So the idea here is 272 00:17:04,960 --> 00:17:10,040 Speaker 7: by building the US merchant marine and the shipbuilding workforce, 273 00:17:10,440 --> 00:17:12,639 Speaker 7: we're also going to help our naval shipbuilding. 274 00:17:13,520 --> 00:17:15,800 Speaker 2: Well, this is actually just a good moment. Why don't 275 00:17:15,880 --> 00:17:19,280 Speaker 2: you describe what give us the outline of the Ships 276 00:17:19,320 --> 00:17:22,560 Speaker 2: for America Act. How much do you underspend, what does 277 00:17:22,600 --> 00:17:25,040 Speaker 2: it hope to achieve? What would the US industry look 278 00:17:25,119 --> 00:17:27,200 Speaker 2: like if all successfully implemented. 279 00:17:27,720 --> 00:17:31,000 Speaker 7: Well, it's a three hundred page piece of legislation. 280 00:17:32,160 --> 00:17:35,920 Speaker 4: It touches every aspect or nearly. 281 00:17:35,640 --> 00:17:38,800 Speaker 7: Every aspect of the maritime industry. I guess I'll just 282 00:17:38,840 --> 00:17:41,560 Speaker 7: start kind of in a random place here. Provide for 283 00:17:41,680 --> 00:17:45,800 Speaker 7: a maritime Security Advisor within the White House who would 284 00:17:46,240 --> 00:17:50,560 Speaker 7: lead an interagency maritime Security Board to make some whole 285 00:17:50,560 --> 00:17:54,720 Speaker 7: of government strategic decisions on how to implement a national 286 00:17:54,760 --> 00:17:59,320 Speaker 7: maritime strategy. It also establishes a Maritime Security Trust Fund 287 00:17:59,320 --> 00:18:04,200 Speaker 7: that would rein asked duties and fees that are paid 288 00:18:04,200 --> 00:18:11,000 Speaker 7: by the maritime industry into maritime security programs and infrastructure programs, 289 00:18:12,040 --> 00:18:14,359 Speaker 7: with the goal here of having two hundred and fifty 290 00:18:15,280 --> 00:18:17,879 Speaker 7: ocean going merchant vessels in ten years. 291 00:18:18,400 --> 00:18:21,360 Speaker 4: We would create a strategic commercial fleet program. 292 00:18:22,080 --> 00:18:25,480 Speaker 7: We would change or establish a rule making committee on 293 00:18:25,520 --> 00:18:29,720 Speaker 7: commercial maritime regulations and standards, and then we would do 294 00:18:29,800 --> 00:18:33,800 Speaker 7: things like requiring government funded cargo to move on US 295 00:18:33,880 --> 00:18:39,160 Speaker 7: flag vessels and require a portion of the cargo imported 296 00:18:39,160 --> 00:18:41,959 Speaker 7: from China to go on US flag vessels starting at 297 00:18:41,960 --> 00:18:46,960 Speaker 7: a later time. There's tax credits, there's Title eleven Federal 298 00:18:47,000 --> 00:18:51,680 Speaker 7: ship financing, there's shipbuilding financial incentive. 299 00:18:51,200 --> 00:18:52,679 Speaker 4: Programs in the legislation. 300 00:18:53,640 --> 00:18:56,879 Speaker 7: There's also a part of this it's about manufacturing and 301 00:18:56,920 --> 00:19:00,760 Speaker 7: innovation and coming up with the next generation of ships 302 00:19:00,800 --> 00:19:04,439 Speaker 7: and ship energy systems, and I could go on. 303 00:19:05,880 --> 00:19:08,840 Speaker 1: Yeah, the bill in its official format is actually three 304 00:19:08,920 --> 00:19:11,560 Speaker 1: hundred and forty four pages long, and I will confess 305 00:19:11,640 --> 00:19:12,959 Speaker 1: I did not read all of it. 306 00:19:13,040 --> 00:19:13,800 Speaker 2: Did you upload it? 307 00:19:15,000 --> 00:19:17,200 Speaker 5: I did not. That's a good idea, Actually I did. 308 00:19:17,640 --> 00:19:20,560 Speaker 1: One of the things I was wondering is, you know, 309 00:19:20,600 --> 00:19:24,520 Speaker 1: this is kind of a Devil's advocate question, but a 310 00:19:24,560 --> 00:19:27,119 Speaker 1: lot of the ACT, as you just outlined, is about 311 00:19:27,119 --> 00:19:31,600 Speaker 1: creating incentives to build ships through things like tax credits 312 00:19:31,760 --> 00:19:36,480 Speaker 1: or providing some subsidies for construction or training. Why can't 313 00:19:36,480 --> 00:19:39,760 Speaker 1: the US government just fund ships directly? If ships are 314 00:19:39,840 --> 00:19:44,480 Speaker 1: so important for national security and trade, why even try 315 00:19:44,520 --> 00:19:46,560 Speaker 1: to leave it to private capital to build? 316 00:19:47,840 --> 00:19:50,119 Speaker 4: Well, that's a good question. 317 00:19:50,160 --> 00:19:52,679 Speaker 7: I mean, I guess that's what China does, right, They 318 00:19:52,960 --> 00:19:55,639 Speaker 7: build them, you know, they put them out there on 319 00:19:55,680 --> 00:19:59,119 Speaker 7: the oceans. They really belong to the Chinese government in 320 00:19:59,119 --> 00:20:03,679 Speaker 7: a way. You know, we are a democracy, we're capitalist society. 321 00:20:03,920 --> 00:20:10,320 Speaker 7: We believe in private markets and private ownership, and we 322 00:20:10,400 --> 00:20:13,760 Speaker 7: believe in, you know, to some extent, maybe helping companies, 323 00:20:13,760 --> 00:20:16,840 Speaker 7: but eventually getting them to the point where they're on 324 00:20:16,880 --> 00:20:20,800 Speaker 7: their own. They're profitable, they're creating good paying jobs. These 325 00:20:20,840 --> 00:20:23,199 Speaker 7: are jobs often that you can raise a family on, 326 00:20:23,320 --> 00:20:25,960 Speaker 7: that do not require a four year degree. So these 327 00:20:25,960 --> 00:20:30,080 Speaker 7: are you know, great you know jobs that are you know, 328 00:20:30,119 --> 00:20:32,719 Speaker 7: provide an economic benefit not just to the people who 329 00:20:32,800 --> 00:20:33,400 Speaker 7: work them, but. 330 00:20:33,320 --> 00:20:35,679 Speaker 4: To our country, and they help us grow the economy. 331 00:20:36,160 --> 00:20:36,800 Speaker 4: I don't think the. 332 00:20:36,800 --> 00:20:42,320 Speaker 7: Government operating its own you know, fleet vessels to move 333 00:20:42,440 --> 00:20:47,119 Speaker 7: commercial cargo, you know, makes a ton of sense, because 334 00:20:47,160 --> 00:20:50,080 Speaker 7: this is this is an important part of our economy. 335 00:20:50,520 --> 00:20:54,040 Speaker 7: It's deteriorated over the years. But you know, what you're 336 00:20:54,080 --> 00:20:58,240 Speaker 7: suggesting would be really like a you know, wholesale pivot 337 00:20:58,280 --> 00:20:59,840 Speaker 7: to government owned industry. 338 00:21:00,560 --> 00:21:02,080 Speaker 2: Let me ask you another question. You know, we've done 339 00:21:02,119 --> 00:21:05,520 Speaker 2: a lot on industrial policy in the past, and one 340 00:21:05,560 --> 00:21:12,920 Speaker 2: of the preconditions or you know, industrial policy can fail easily, 341 00:21:12,960 --> 00:21:17,000 Speaker 2: and you can have cronyism, and you can have companies 342 00:21:17,040 --> 00:21:20,639 Speaker 2: overbuilding the government for mediocre products. And this is just 343 00:21:21,000 --> 00:21:23,919 Speaker 2: one of the pitfalls of anytime there's a lot of 344 00:21:24,119 --> 00:21:26,960 Speaker 2: public money going to something. But one way that this 345 00:21:27,040 --> 00:21:31,880 Speaker 2: gets addressed historically in some markets is this idea of 346 00:21:32,440 --> 00:21:36,800 Speaker 2: the domestic champion has to be competitive on the global market. 347 00:21:36,840 --> 00:21:39,080 Speaker 2: And so if you're a car company or a chip 348 00:21:39,119 --> 00:21:42,680 Speaker 2: company in China or something like. You know, you don't 349 00:21:42,680 --> 00:21:46,240 Speaker 2: have any guaranteed buyers overseas because the chip maker is 350 00:21:46,280 --> 00:21:49,560 Speaker 2: still competing with Texas Instruments or BYD is still competing 351 00:21:49,600 --> 00:21:53,120 Speaker 2: with Tesla. What are the mechanisms that you have in 352 00:21:53,160 --> 00:21:56,880 Speaker 2: place or that you envision to still have that sort 353 00:21:56,960 --> 00:22:00,640 Speaker 2: of market discipline so to speak, so that yes, there 354 00:22:00,680 --> 00:22:03,520 Speaker 2: is this public money going, but there is still this 355 00:22:03,680 --> 00:22:07,040 Speaker 2: element that, yeah, we want the ships to be really 356 00:22:07,160 --> 00:22:12,360 Speaker 2: good and competitive and competitively priced and to sort of win, 357 00:22:12,520 --> 00:22:14,440 Speaker 2: so to speak, so that we know we're getting value 358 00:22:14,480 --> 00:22:15,040 Speaker 2: from the spending. 359 00:22:15,680 --> 00:22:17,240 Speaker 4: Well, yeah, let me take that. 360 00:22:17,920 --> 00:22:21,800 Speaker 6: And frankly, this builds off of the previous question. First, 361 00:22:22,040 --> 00:22:25,440 Speaker 6: I've learned a lot and frankly thought a fair amount 362 00:22:25,560 --> 00:22:28,760 Speaker 6: about industrial policy in recent years through. 363 00:22:28,600 --> 00:22:29,440 Speaker 4: The Chips Act. 364 00:22:30,600 --> 00:22:35,480 Speaker 6: From a purely economic standpoint, there would be no difference 365 00:22:35,920 --> 00:22:41,960 Speaker 6: when it comes to direct payments to grantee companies that 366 00:22:42,119 --> 00:22:46,879 Speaker 6: are charged with building ships on behalf of both our 367 00:22:46,880 --> 00:22:53,920 Speaker 6: commercial industry and for future national security reasons. But administratively 368 00:22:54,600 --> 00:22:59,400 Speaker 6: you can cut down on any concerns over croniism or 369 00:22:59,480 --> 00:23:06,720 Speaker 6: waste by having a neutral arbiter. And despite some anomalies 370 00:23:06,920 --> 00:23:11,240 Speaker 6: over time. Our IRS is a pretty neutral arbiter. So 371 00:23:11,359 --> 00:23:17,480 Speaker 6: when you are funding this shipbuilding initiative through the tax code, 372 00:23:17,600 --> 00:23:21,639 Speaker 6: it does provide a neutral arbiter. Sometimes the downside to 373 00:23:21,720 --> 00:23:24,119 Speaker 6: that approach is that you end up funding through the 374 00:23:24,200 --> 00:23:29,760 Speaker 6: tax code more enterprises and certain enterprises the would otherwise fund. 375 00:23:29,800 --> 00:23:33,000 Speaker 6: So there are trade offs when you make decisions about 376 00:23:33,040 --> 00:23:38,600 Speaker 6: how you administer your industrial policy. That would be point one. 377 00:23:38,640 --> 00:23:44,560 Speaker 6: Point two about establishing market discipline is very important. If 378 00:23:44,600 --> 00:23:49,240 Speaker 6: you look at semiconductors, that market is incredibly distributed and 379 00:23:49,440 --> 00:23:53,000 Speaker 6: ramified all across the world. We will see for any 380 00:23:53,000 --> 00:23:58,240 Speaker 6: given semiconductor it going across international borders dozens and dozens 381 00:23:58,240 --> 00:24:02,679 Speaker 6: of times before it becomes assembled component. In the case 382 00:24:03,000 --> 00:24:05,920 Speaker 6: of ships, of course you're going to have components going 383 00:24:05,960 --> 00:24:09,680 Speaker 6: in and out of the country some but it's less distributed, 384 00:24:10,560 --> 00:24:14,679 Speaker 6: and it will be the job in the main of 385 00:24:14,760 --> 00:24:19,320 Speaker 6: our diplomats and of our private enterprises to sell our 386 00:24:19,400 --> 00:24:23,200 Speaker 6: ships into other markets. We need to open up other 387 00:24:23,359 --> 00:24:27,520 Speaker 6: markets through trade policy, something I'm also an advocate of 388 00:24:27,560 --> 00:24:31,280 Speaker 6: and will continue to argue for. In part, and this 389 00:24:31,359 --> 00:24:34,479 Speaker 6: is a rarely mentioned dimension of trade policy, but one 390 00:24:34,520 --> 00:24:36,760 Speaker 6: of the reasons we want to trade with the rest 391 00:24:36,760 --> 00:24:39,600 Speaker 6: of the world is to enforce a certain efficiency and 392 00:24:39,680 --> 00:24:43,320 Speaker 6: discipline on our own economy so that we will see 393 00:24:43,320 --> 00:24:47,560 Speaker 6: a deployment of resources efficiently and we can grow faster 394 00:24:47,840 --> 00:24:51,480 Speaker 6: and all become more wealthy. So I mean, that's how 395 00:24:51,520 --> 00:24:54,840 Speaker 6: this will be accomplished. But what we have right now 396 00:24:55,880 --> 00:25:02,639 Speaker 6: is we have a more concentrated shipbuilding industry in particular 397 00:25:02,680 --> 00:25:05,280 Speaker 6: countries because they see not only the commercial but also 398 00:25:05,359 --> 00:25:10,800 Speaker 6: the national security upside to excelling in shipbuilding. And it 399 00:25:10,840 --> 00:25:13,719 Speaker 6: will take some work from our government to open up 400 00:25:13,760 --> 00:25:16,360 Speaker 6: foreign markets for our ships down the road, so we're 401 00:25:16,359 --> 00:25:19,520 Speaker 6: not there yet. We can't wait for that, however. I mean, 402 00:25:19,560 --> 00:25:23,960 Speaker 6: we own three percent of the global commercial fleet right now. 403 00:25:24,560 --> 00:25:28,520 Speaker 6: China owns roughly one fifth of the world's fleet, and 404 00:25:28,640 --> 00:25:34,640 Speaker 6: they will, through their bulk carriers, move a far larger 405 00:25:34,680 --> 00:25:39,720 Speaker 6: proportion of American goods into the United States. So they've 406 00:25:39,760 --> 00:25:42,960 Speaker 6: got us at the end of a barrel, frankly, and 407 00:25:43,040 --> 00:25:46,960 Speaker 6: there is some urgency to us beginning this exercise now, 408 00:25:47,080 --> 00:25:51,720 Speaker 6: especially in light of many of our national security communities 409 00:25:51,800 --> 00:25:59,359 Speaker 6: predictions about Chinese misbehavior visa VI Taiwan or South China Sea, 410 00:26:00,200 --> 00:26:04,720 Speaker 6: which will require a maritime response from the United States, 411 00:26:05,160 --> 00:26:08,840 Speaker 6: and at this point in time, we just cannot move 412 00:26:09,440 --> 00:26:14,040 Speaker 6: enough material and enough of our soldier sailers and airmen 413 00:26:14,560 --> 00:26:17,440 Speaker 6: to win a fight. And that ought to send a 414 00:26:17,480 --> 00:26:20,360 Speaker 6: shiver down the spine of most Americans. 415 00:26:20,480 --> 00:26:24,760 Speaker 1: Since you brought up the broader trade landscape, would you 416 00:26:24,840 --> 00:26:28,360 Speaker 1: expect retaliation from China for this act? I think it's 417 00:26:28,400 --> 00:26:30,920 Speaker 1: fair to say at the moment the relationship between the 418 00:26:31,040 --> 00:26:34,680 Speaker 1: US and China is pretty freed given the ongoing trade war. 419 00:26:34,840 --> 00:26:37,680 Speaker 1: And one of the things this act proposes is creating 420 00:26:38,080 --> 00:26:42,480 Speaker 1: a commercial cargo preference, so that in fifteen years, ten 421 00:26:42,520 --> 00:26:45,520 Speaker 1: percent of all cargo that's imported into the US from 422 00:26:45,640 --> 00:26:49,880 Speaker 1: China will need to be imported on US flagged vessels. 423 00:26:50,280 --> 00:26:53,640 Speaker 1: And I imagine that China might not like that, right 424 00:26:53,760 --> 00:26:56,560 Speaker 1: We talked earlier about how they've been supporting their own 425 00:26:56,640 --> 00:27:00,960 Speaker 1: domestic shipbuilding industry, so clearly this is important to them. 426 00:27:01,320 --> 00:27:06,359 Speaker 1: Could they potentially respond in kind with their own restrictions. 427 00:27:07,760 --> 00:27:10,199 Speaker 7: Well, they could always do that, Tracy, But when you 428 00:27:10,240 --> 00:27:13,040 Speaker 7: think about ten percent is pretty modest. You know, we're 429 00:27:13,080 --> 00:27:17,359 Speaker 7: building our capacity. We're going to require you know, certain 430 00:27:17,400 --> 00:27:22,119 Speaker 7: cargo to be carried on US flag ships. Under you know, 431 00:27:22,200 --> 00:27:27,760 Speaker 7: this Act, but we can't be making industrial policy decisions 432 00:27:27,800 --> 00:27:30,000 Speaker 7: based on what we think the response from China is 433 00:27:30,000 --> 00:27:30,359 Speaker 7: going to be. 434 00:27:30,960 --> 00:27:31,480 Speaker 4: You know, if they. 435 00:27:31,400 --> 00:27:35,160 Speaker 7: Respond, we'll figure out up way forward and figure out 436 00:27:35,240 --> 00:27:39,560 Speaker 7: how do we you know, counter a response if it's unfair. 437 00:27:40,280 --> 00:27:41,240 Speaker 4: But right now. 438 00:27:41,040 --> 00:27:46,359 Speaker 7: When you you know, just consider the capacity that China 439 00:27:46,440 --> 00:27:50,879 Speaker 7: has in this industry five thousand, five hundred ocean going 440 00:27:51,359 --> 00:27:52,560 Speaker 7: merchant vessels and. 441 00:27:52,480 --> 00:27:53,320 Speaker 4: We have eighty. 442 00:27:53,520 --> 00:27:57,440 Speaker 7: We've got to turn this around. Like semiconductors, we didn't 443 00:27:57,440 --> 00:28:00,879 Speaker 7: get into the you know, details of why you know, 444 00:28:00,920 --> 00:28:05,520 Speaker 7: the semiconductor industry is so important, but the best semiconductors 445 00:28:05,800 --> 00:28:09,520 Speaker 7: are made in Taiwan company to call TSMC, and if 446 00:28:09,560 --> 00:28:11,760 Speaker 7: we lose access to those this is part of the 447 00:28:11,760 --> 00:28:15,359 Speaker 7: discussion we had today with our yesterday with Admiral Paparo. 448 00:28:15,600 --> 00:28:18,760 Speaker 7: If we lose access to semiconductor chips from Taiwan, we 449 00:28:18,800 --> 00:28:21,639 Speaker 7: could very quickly lose five to ten percent of our GDP. 450 00:28:22,240 --> 00:28:25,800 Speaker 7: Unemployment could go up ten percent in the United States 451 00:28:25,920 --> 00:28:29,040 Speaker 7: rather rapidly. So that's one of the reasons we wanted 452 00:28:29,040 --> 00:28:32,240 Speaker 7: to onshore you know, this capability. And you know, Todd 453 00:28:32,280 --> 00:28:35,639 Speaker 7: was the author of the bill that I worked on 454 00:28:35,800 --> 00:28:40,120 Speaker 7: with him. So, yeah, I think it's always possible we 455 00:28:40,160 --> 00:28:43,360 Speaker 7: could see a response from the Chinese. But that doesn't, 456 00:28:43,720 --> 00:28:45,120 Speaker 7: you know, mean we shouldn't do this. 457 00:28:45,440 --> 00:28:50,960 Speaker 6: Yeah, Tracy, we have to assume that the Chinese will, 458 00:28:51,560 --> 00:28:54,800 Speaker 6: you know, be upset. But what they aim to do, 459 00:28:55,080 --> 00:28:59,600 Speaker 6: and it's an intelligent thing to do, is by threatening 460 00:29:00,400 --> 00:29:06,400 Speaker 6: a response, because our economies remain interwoven. By threatening a response, 461 00:29:06,440 --> 00:29:10,600 Speaker 6: they want to deter us from making our own economy 462 00:29:10,680 --> 00:29:14,720 Speaker 6: more resilient. And as long as we remain vulnerable to 463 00:29:15,400 --> 00:29:21,000 Speaker 6: their provocative threats and activities, then our policymakers will have 464 00:29:21,120 --> 00:29:26,160 Speaker 6: to think about the economic cost and sometimes even military costs. 465 00:29:25,840 --> 00:29:27,680 Speaker 4: They'll impose on our country. 466 00:29:28,040 --> 00:29:31,240 Speaker 6: We have to get ourselves out of this predicament, and 467 00:29:31,640 --> 00:29:36,440 Speaker 6: why not do so by being consistent with something we've 468 00:29:36,480 --> 00:29:39,240 Speaker 6: told the Chinese and the rest of the world for generations, 469 00:29:39,240 --> 00:29:43,280 Speaker 6: which is the United States of America will be the 470 00:29:43,320 --> 00:29:47,760 Speaker 6: world's best friend and at times your best enemy. But 471 00:29:47,960 --> 00:29:52,440 Speaker 6: all we ask to ensure we remain friends is a 472 00:29:52,560 --> 00:29:58,120 Speaker 6: measure of reciprocity. It's a fundamental trading principle, and the 473 00:29:58,240 --> 00:30:03,960 Speaker 6: Chinese favor their own commercial vessels. The Chinese offer extensive 474 00:30:04,080 --> 00:30:07,880 Speaker 6: subsidies not only for their shipbuilding industry, but across the 475 00:30:07,920 --> 00:30:12,080 Speaker 6: board for industries they regard as strategic. So we're following 476 00:30:12,120 --> 00:30:16,320 Speaker 6: through with a long standing philosophy, and a key here 477 00:30:17,200 --> 00:30:19,840 Speaker 6: is that when we make these sorts of actions, we 478 00:30:19,920 --> 00:30:24,640 Speaker 6: do so in coordination with partners and allies. In this case, 479 00:30:25,240 --> 00:30:27,960 Speaker 6: in the last administration, the Secretary of the Navy and 480 00:30:28,000 --> 00:30:31,880 Speaker 6: the administration, we're able to unlock a significant investment which 481 00:30:31,880 --> 00:30:37,560 Speaker 6: I understand may be forthcoming in our Philadelphia Naval shipyard 482 00:30:37,600 --> 00:30:41,600 Speaker 6: from South Korea. So that's an illustration of how if 483 00:30:41,600 --> 00:30:44,600 Speaker 6: we start to get some buy in from other economies 484 00:30:44,760 --> 00:30:49,920 Speaker 6: and businesses and countries to our own shipbuilding exercise because 485 00:30:49,960 --> 00:30:53,239 Speaker 6: they too have a vested interest in our economic and 486 00:30:53,360 --> 00:30:57,600 Speaker 6: military strength, we can mitigate any blowback from China. 487 00:30:57,720 --> 00:31:01,000 Speaker 2: You sort of anticipated my next question, because one way 488 00:31:01,680 --> 00:31:05,720 Speaker 2: that you can sort of balance the goals for efficiency 489 00:31:05,880 --> 00:31:11,920 Speaker 2: and dynamic market economies alongside the national security concerns is 490 00:31:12,280 --> 00:31:15,280 Speaker 2: working with allies and countries that we trust in countries 491 00:31:15,440 --> 00:31:19,920 Speaker 2: in similar positions and et cetera. In your law, in 492 00:31:19,960 --> 00:31:24,480 Speaker 2: your proposed bill, what is the role for foreign companies 493 00:31:24,560 --> 00:31:29,440 Speaker 2: either building directly here or you know, us investment elsewhere, 494 00:31:29,560 --> 00:31:34,640 Speaker 2: but among friends, so to speak, in revitalizing this capacity, 495 00:31:34,800 --> 00:31:36,360 Speaker 2: how are allies treated? 496 00:31:36,960 --> 00:31:40,479 Speaker 7: Well, you know, we want our allies to work with 497 00:31:40,560 --> 00:31:43,160 Speaker 7: us here in the United States. You know there are 498 00:31:43,520 --> 00:31:49,360 Speaker 7: foreign shipbuilders that could build capacity here in shipyards and 499 00:31:49,400 --> 00:31:52,640 Speaker 7: be our partners. You know, that's built into the legislation. 500 00:31:53,520 --> 00:31:57,040 Speaker 7: So this could benefit our allies, and that's one of 501 00:31:57,080 --> 00:31:59,040 Speaker 7: our you know, strategic strengths as. 502 00:31:58,880 --> 00:32:02,360 Speaker 4: We actually have a China doesn't have that. 503 00:32:03,040 --> 00:32:07,560 Speaker 7: So when we develop this sort of policy, it's important 504 00:32:07,560 --> 00:32:10,400 Speaker 7: that we keep our allies in mind, and this legislation 505 00:32:10,560 --> 00:32:10,840 Speaker 7: does that. 506 00:32:27,320 --> 00:32:29,640 Speaker 1: One of the other things I'm sure people will be 507 00:32:29,680 --> 00:32:33,920 Speaker 1: curious about is the ultimate impact on cargo costs. And 508 00:32:33,960 --> 00:32:37,840 Speaker 1: as you mentioned, during the pandemic, we all experience the 509 00:32:37,880 --> 00:32:41,240 Speaker 1: frustration of not being able to buy toilet paper or 510 00:32:41,320 --> 00:32:45,000 Speaker 1: electronic goods or whatever because of empty shelves. And with 511 00:32:45,080 --> 00:32:47,960 Speaker 1: this Act, on the one hand, you're trying to expand 512 00:32:47,960 --> 00:32:52,400 Speaker 1: capacity with additional ships, which would presumably bring costs down. 513 00:32:52,720 --> 00:32:54,840 Speaker 1: But on the other hand, there are people out there, 514 00:32:55,400 --> 00:32:59,920 Speaker 1: I'm thinking specifically of Lars Jensen, shipping expert, who argue 515 00:33:00,120 --> 00:33:03,840 Speaker 1: that the ACT as currently designed would increase shipping costs 516 00:33:03,880 --> 00:33:08,040 Speaker 1: for US importers and exporters. And yeah, as we learned 517 00:33:08,080 --> 00:33:10,720 Speaker 1: during the pandemic, the cost of transporting goods is pretty 518 00:33:10,760 --> 00:33:14,920 Speaker 1: important to broader inflation. It feeds into almost everything, at 519 00:33:14,960 --> 00:33:17,640 Speaker 1: least when it comes to goods. How do you sort 520 00:33:17,680 --> 00:33:22,200 Speaker 1: of balance I guess, the additional costs of transitioning to 521 00:33:22,400 --> 00:33:26,400 Speaker 1: this new system versus ultimately trying to bring down prices. 522 00:33:27,200 --> 00:33:32,360 Speaker 6: Well, let me address that. From an economic standpoint. What 523 00:33:32,480 --> 00:33:37,880 Speaker 6: you want to establish is certainty in your economy, and 524 00:33:37,960 --> 00:33:41,160 Speaker 6: at the consumer level and the business level, you don't 525 00:33:41,200 --> 00:33:45,240 Speaker 6: want big spikes and then valleys and prices. That does 526 00:33:45,280 --> 00:33:50,520 Speaker 6: not lend itself to stability or confidence in the markets. 527 00:33:50,560 --> 00:33:53,680 Speaker 6: It makes it very difficult at the household level to 528 00:33:53,840 --> 00:33:59,040 Speaker 6: plan your expenditures. We I think all experienced a measure 529 00:33:59,080 --> 00:34:01,880 Speaker 6: of that during the pandemic, where some things were shooting 530 00:34:01,960 --> 00:34:05,040 Speaker 6: up and then other things were on discount, and it 531 00:34:05,080 --> 00:34:09,359 Speaker 6: became kind of an alternative universe. And the way we 532 00:34:09,400 --> 00:34:12,760 Speaker 6: aim to address prices, and you alluded to it, Tracy, 533 00:34:13,080 --> 00:34:16,360 Speaker 6: was by making sure we have more control under a 534 00:34:16,440 --> 00:34:19,560 Speaker 6: key uncertainty and the value chain, and that value chain 535 00:34:19,640 --> 00:34:24,400 Speaker 6: is the shipping of your products across an ocean and 536 00:34:24,440 --> 00:34:29,360 Speaker 6: that's at the export and import level, and so we 537 00:34:29,800 --> 00:34:34,160 Speaker 6: have control over that. Does that in the near term, 538 00:34:34,400 --> 00:34:40,480 Speaker 6: prior to a crisis lead to marginal premium on certain products. 539 00:34:40,520 --> 00:34:45,799 Speaker 6: It could, it could lead to a marginal increase. But 540 00:34:46,080 --> 00:34:49,080 Speaker 6: net net, you're not going to be experiencing those highs 541 00:34:49,400 --> 00:34:54,600 Speaker 6: and lows, and most importantly, you will not experience the 542 00:34:55,200 --> 00:35:01,160 Speaker 6: incredible cost of losing sovereignty, losing the ability to make 543 00:35:01,200 --> 00:35:05,680 Speaker 6: your own economic policies because of economic coercion a key 544 00:35:05,760 --> 00:35:10,160 Speaker 6: tactic of the Chinese Communist Party, or to be able 545 00:35:10,200 --> 00:35:14,200 Speaker 6: to defend your way of life through military force, because 546 00:35:14,239 --> 00:35:17,719 Speaker 6: you can't move the men and women to where they 547 00:35:17,760 --> 00:35:21,360 Speaker 6: need to go and the material and difficult circumstances. So 548 00:35:21,840 --> 00:35:27,200 Speaker 6: you know, as with other construction efforts, you know, we 549 00:35:27,360 --> 00:35:32,480 Speaker 6: build military jets here. For example, there wasn't a robust 550 00:35:32,640 --> 00:35:36,600 Speaker 6: enough consumer market in the United States to build fighter jets, 551 00:35:36,640 --> 00:35:42,160 Speaker 6: so we ask the taxpayers to front some investments so 552 00:35:42,280 --> 00:35:45,160 Speaker 6: we have the capacity to build it for a military 553 00:35:45,640 --> 00:35:48,440 Speaker 6: There's a dimension of that here as well. 554 00:35:48,520 --> 00:35:50,800 Speaker 2: I mean, I think this is a really important point. 555 00:35:50,840 --> 00:35:54,239 Speaker 2: It gets to this very sort of deep tension. Everyone 556 00:35:54,680 --> 00:35:59,000 Speaker 2: likes the idea of spare capacity, especially in the moment, 557 00:35:59,280 --> 00:36:02,520 Speaker 2: like a March twenty twenty, or a pandemic or a 558 00:36:03,200 --> 00:36:06,640 Speaker 2: theoretical war. On the other hand, you know in times 559 00:36:06,680 --> 00:36:08,480 Speaker 2: of peace or in times of health when there isn't 560 00:36:08,520 --> 00:36:11,560 Speaker 2: a pandemic, you know, it is a cost, and it's 561 00:36:11,640 --> 00:36:15,239 Speaker 2: very hard to quantify or sort of perhaps into it 562 00:36:15,440 --> 00:36:17,920 Speaker 2: the price that you're paying for this sort of you know, 563 00:36:18,400 --> 00:36:21,759 Speaker 2: potential black swan event. Just real quickly, because we didn't 564 00:36:21,800 --> 00:36:24,560 Speaker 2: touch on this, how much are you envisioning this would 565 00:36:24,600 --> 00:36:26,799 Speaker 2: cost to get to your goals? How much would be 566 00:36:26,840 --> 00:36:30,279 Speaker 2: actually allocated? And what are the funding mechanisms. I think 567 00:36:30,320 --> 00:36:33,120 Speaker 2: you mentioned some sort of trust fund, but just talk 568 00:36:33,239 --> 00:36:34,720 Speaker 2: us through the dollars aspect. 569 00:36:36,000 --> 00:36:38,480 Speaker 7: Well, this bill is paid for, I mean, it's paid 570 00:36:38,520 --> 00:36:44,800 Speaker 7: for within fees that are generated within our maritime industry. 571 00:36:44,920 --> 00:36:48,200 Speaker 7: So there's not a significant amount of like direct funding. 572 00:36:48,200 --> 00:36:50,480 Speaker 7: I don't think we have a score on it yet. Okay, 573 00:36:50,600 --> 00:36:54,680 Speaker 7: tax credits are paid for by fees that you know, 574 00:36:54,760 --> 00:36:57,640 Speaker 7: shipping companies you know, will be paying as they bring 575 00:36:57,719 --> 00:37:01,600 Speaker 7: cargo into the United States, tonnage fees and other programs 576 00:37:01,719 --> 00:37:05,040 Speaker 7: like that. So in some ways I'd say it's different 577 00:37:05,320 --> 00:37:08,239 Speaker 7: than the Chips and Science Act in that regard and 578 00:37:08,280 --> 00:37:10,440 Speaker 7: how these things are paid for. 579 00:37:10,920 --> 00:37:16,160 Speaker 1: How confident are you of pushing this proposal through because 580 00:37:16,320 --> 00:37:18,680 Speaker 1: you know, on the one hand, it has bipartisan support, 581 00:37:18,800 --> 00:37:21,120 Speaker 1: and there are a lot of things you can say 582 00:37:21,160 --> 00:37:23,960 Speaker 1: that about nowadays. But on the other hand, a lot 583 00:37:24,000 --> 00:37:26,360 Speaker 1: of the focus of the new administration seems to be 584 00:37:26,560 --> 00:37:30,440 Speaker 1: on dismantling various things or making things more efficient versus 585 00:37:30,560 --> 00:37:32,920 Speaker 1: actually building new stuff. 586 00:37:34,360 --> 00:37:37,320 Speaker 6: Well, I can as a Republican, I can tell you 587 00:37:37,600 --> 00:37:43,400 Speaker 6: that President Trump likes to build things. He likes beautiful things. 588 00:37:44,080 --> 00:37:49,520 Speaker 6: He likes to create jobs, manufacturing jobs. He especially likes 589 00:37:49,600 --> 00:37:55,799 Speaker 6: the opportunity to create more manufacturing jobs in the industrial Midwest, 590 00:37:56,160 --> 00:37:59,520 Speaker 6: a place that loves President Trump. And there will be 591 00:37:59,640 --> 00:38:04,920 Speaker 6: compos of these ships, if not additional shipyards brought to 592 00:38:05,000 --> 00:38:10,520 Speaker 6: bear on this national and economic security challenge. And he's 593 00:38:10,880 --> 00:38:15,239 Speaker 6: enlisted the help already in his national security team of 594 00:38:15,520 --> 00:38:20,879 Speaker 6: key individuals who are fully supportive of this effort, one 595 00:38:21,000 --> 00:38:24,839 Speaker 6: being a friend of Mark Kelly's, Mike Waltz, who is 596 00:38:24,880 --> 00:38:28,640 Speaker 6: now the National Security Advisor. He's bought into this vision 597 00:38:28,760 --> 00:38:32,040 Speaker 6: in the past as a member of Congress. Another is 598 00:38:32,600 --> 00:38:37,399 Speaker 6: Jerry Hendrix, who Mark also knows happens to be from 599 00:38:37,400 --> 00:38:41,560 Speaker 6: my state. Jerry is a supply chain expert with particular 600 00:38:41,640 --> 00:38:45,720 Speaker 6: expertise in shipbuilding and spent a career in the Navy, 601 00:38:45,840 --> 00:38:49,640 Speaker 6: and he's bought into this sort of vision. So we 602 00:38:49,719 --> 00:38:53,319 Speaker 6: have some key allies and surrogates who can help us 603 00:38:53,360 --> 00:38:57,560 Speaker 6: make the case. It's never easy during times like these, 604 00:38:57,640 --> 00:39:03,400 Speaker 6: when we Republicans, I think are rightly focused on fiscal responsibility, 605 00:39:03,480 --> 00:39:06,239 Speaker 6: which I don't want to suggest Mark doesn't care about either. 606 00:39:06,320 --> 00:39:11,120 Speaker 6: He does, but we are warm to making our military 607 00:39:11,200 --> 00:39:14,440 Speaker 6: more effective and this is an important way to do so. 608 00:39:14,960 --> 00:39:16,840 Speaker 7: And Tracy, I think there's going to be a tremendous 609 00:39:16,880 --> 00:39:19,600 Speaker 7: amount of enthusiasm for this legislation. It's the kind of 610 00:39:19,640 --> 00:39:23,040 Speaker 7: thing that works on both sides of the aisle. You know, 611 00:39:23,080 --> 00:39:28,800 Speaker 7: we all realize that China is an adversary. President Shei, 612 00:39:29,239 --> 00:39:32,680 Speaker 7: the Chinese president, has said things that are rather aggressive 613 00:39:32,880 --> 00:39:36,440 Speaker 7: in the past. We've got to rebuild this industry. We 614 00:39:36,480 --> 00:39:39,440 Speaker 7: are a maritime nation. We've got water on both sides. 615 00:39:39,960 --> 00:39:40,160 Speaker 4: You know. 616 00:39:40,200 --> 00:39:44,720 Speaker 7: The Chinese have this vision of being a worldwide naval 617 00:39:44,760 --> 00:39:48,759 Speaker 7: and maritime power. They're building more naval ships than we 618 00:39:48,840 --> 00:39:50,480 Speaker 7: are every single year. 619 00:39:50,600 --> 00:39:52,040 Speaker 4: They're building more submarines. 620 00:39:52,640 --> 00:39:54,880 Speaker 7: We've got to get this back on track, and this 621 00:39:55,000 --> 00:39:57,439 Speaker 7: legislation is going to be a part of the thing 622 00:39:57,480 --> 00:40:00,880 Speaker 7: that we need to do. A big part actually to 623 00:40:00,920 --> 00:40:04,239 Speaker 7: turn this well, since I'm a Navy guy, to turn 624 00:40:04,280 --> 00:40:05,720 Speaker 7: this like aircraft. 625 00:40:05,239 --> 00:40:08,319 Speaker 4: Carry around take some time. It's a big part of this. 626 00:40:08,680 --> 00:40:11,520 Speaker 7: But unfortunately I've got to go, so I want to 627 00:40:11,560 --> 00:40:12,279 Speaker 7: wrap this up. 628 00:40:12,160 --> 00:40:12,600 Speaker 4: Here with you. 629 00:40:12,640 --> 00:40:15,640 Speaker 7: I appreciate your interest in this. You know, Todd and 630 00:40:15,680 --> 00:40:18,080 Speaker 7: I have been working on this for some time. Todd 631 00:40:18,120 --> 00:40:22,480 Speaker 7: mentioned Mike Waltz originally when this started. It was because 632 00:40:22,520 --> 00:40:25,920 Speaker 7: we had a common interest in this topic. He's now 633 00:40:26,360 --> 00:40:29,960 Speaker 7: the President's National Security Advisor, so we know at least 634 00:40:30,000 --> 00:40:31,880 Speaker 7: in his office there's a lot of interest in getting 635 00:40:31,880 --> 00:40:36,120 Speaker 7: this done. So I'm incredibly excited about getting this across 636 00:40:36,120 --> 00:40:38,920 Speaker 7: the finish line. We're going to reintroduce this soon in 637 00:40:39,000 --> 00:40:42,240 Speaker 7: this Congress, and then Todd and I in the Senate 638 00:40:42,440 --> 00:40:47,600 Speaker 7: and Representative Kelly in the House and Representative Garymandi, We're 639 00:40:47,640 --> 00:40:50,200 Speaker 7: all going to work together to get more co sponsors 640 00:40:50,200 --> 00:40:52,360 Speaker 7: to go through the process of getting this across the place. 641 00:40:52,440 --> 00:40:55,920 Speaker 2: Life Senators Mark Kelly and Todd Young, thank you so 642 00:40:56,040 --> 00:40:59,279 Speaker 2: much for coming on online. There was fantastic Thanks. 643 00:40:59,040 --> 00:41:03,560 Speaker 7: For having us write it. 644 00:41:13,040 --> 00:41:17,000 Speaker 2: Tracy A. I really enjoyed that conversation. B You're gonna 645 00:41:17,000 --> 00:41:18,800 Speaker 2: make fun of me because of how boomer I'm getting. 646 00:41:18,920 --> 00:41:21,160 Speaker 2: Like when like when you just want to build the 647 00:41:21,160 --> 00:41:24,360 Speaker 2: big Yeah, like Senator Kelly starts like a Virginia Class 648 00:41:24,400 --> 00:41:26,799 Speaker 2: submarines and stuff like that. I get the hair on 649 00:41:26,840 --> 00:41:29,080 Speaker 2: my arm picks up. You know, I get excited about 650 00:41:29,120 --> 00:41:29,560 Speaker 2: stuff like that. 651 00:41:29,600 --> 00:41:30,520 Speaker 5: They are cool things. 652 00:41:30,640 --> 00:41:31,040 Speaker 4: You know what. 653 00:41:31,160 --> 00:41:34,200 Speaker 1: I was rewatching Pretty Woman the other day, Yeah, and 654 00:41:34,360 --> 00:41:37,200 Speaker 1: I realized I had an epiphany. It's actually it's all 655 00:41:37,200 --> 00:41:40,840 Speaker 1: about shipbuilding. Yeah, right, that one guy wants to build 656 00:41:40,840 --> 00:41:43,840 Speaker 1: ships and Richard Gear ultimately has it come to Jesus 657 00:41:43,960 --> 00:41:47,200 Speaker 1: moment and decides to build them with him rather than 658 00:41:47,200 --> 00:41:50,840 Speaker 1: dismantling the company. So you know, shipbuilding is part of 659 00:41:50,880 --> 00:41:51,719 Speaker 1: the American jury. 660 00:41:51,880 --> 00:41:55,279 Speaker 2: I mean it literally, it literally is. And you know, 661 00:41:55,480 --> 00:41:58,920 Speaker 2: I actually really liked this conversation for many reasons. But 662 00:41:59,040 --> 00:42:02,000 Speaker 2: one it's sort of like gets down to some core 663 00:42:02,320 --> 00:42:05,799 Speaker 2: economic philosophical questions. And I remember, I think it was 664 00:42:05,920 --> 00:42:09,480 Speaker 2: spring of last year we did that conversation with Christian 665 00:42:09,480 --> 00:42:14,560 Speaker 2: Parente about Alexander Hamilton's Treaty or Treatise on Manufactures and 666 00:42:14,680 --> 00:42:18,239 Speaker 2: this idea that I think there's two things. A that 667 00:42:18,320 --> 00:42:21,200 Speaker 2: a country that can't build things is a country whose 668 00:42:21,239 --> 00:42:24,200 Speaker 2: sovereignty is really in doubt. I think is a really 669 00:42:24,280 --> 00:42:26,640 Speaker 2: just like core idea, And it's interesting to hear them 670 00:42:26,760 --> 00:42:30,560 Speaker 2: articulate this. And then this idea that, yeah, the US 671 00:42:30,680 --> 00:42:35,080 Speaker 2: economy is largely governed, so to speak, by the profit 672 00:42:35,160 --> 00:42:40,040 Speaker 2: principle and maximum efficiency, and it's cheaper to ship goods 673 00:42:40,560 --> 00:42:46,000 Speaker 2: on foreign owned ships, particularly if foreign governments are subsidizing 674 00:42:46,120 --> 00:42:49,440 Speaker 2: those ships, which means it's a de facto subsidy to 675 00:42:49,560 --> 00:42:52,920 Speaker 2: American consumers. But then the idea of okay, well, if 676 00:42:52,960 --> 00:42:55,960 Speaker 2: that ultimately long term puts us in a position where 677 00:42:56,000 --> 00:42:58,799 Speaker 2: our sovereignty is threatened. It's not just ships, it's obviously 678 00:42:59,080 --> 00:43:02,480 Speaker 2: things like semi cans and really many other things, then 679 00:43:02,520 --> 00:43:04,879 Speaker 2: you have to think about what is the price you're 680 00:43:04,920 --> 00:43:09,000 Speaker 2: going to pay for avoiding some tail risk, which is 681 00:43:09,040 --> 00:43:10,120 Speaker 2: really hard to measure down the. 682 00:43:10,120 --> 00:43:12,439 Speaker 1: Road, There is certainly a tension there. 683 00:43:12,640 --> 00:43:12,879 Speaker 4: Yeah. 684 00:43:12,920 --> 00:43:16,359 Speaker 1: The other thing I would say is it's interesting to 685 00:43:16,400 --> 00:43:21,040 Speaker 1: me how much this lines up with very traditional Knesian economics, 686 00:43:21,120 --> 00:43:24,279 Speaker 1: right in the sense that Kines argued that there's a 687 00:43:24,360 --> 00:43:27,040 Speaker 1: role for government to smooth economic cycles. 688 00:43:27,120 --> 00:43:28,959 Speaker 5: Yes, and we're talking about. 689 00:43:28,640 --> 00:43:35,520 Speaker 1: An extremely cyclical industry that's famous for boombust periods, and so, 690 00:43:35,880 --> 00:43:38,960 Speaker 1: you know, coming at it from that perspective, the idea 691 00:43:38,960 --> 00:43:41,879 Speaker 1: of the government being a sort of like smooth the 692 00:43:41,920 --> 00:43:43,799 Speaker 1: cycle actor makes some sense. 693 00:43:43,920 --> 00:43:44,720 Speaker 5: Well, this is interesting. 694 00:43:44,760 --> 00:43:47,640 Speaker 2: I've been, you know, trying to read more about defense 695 00:43:48,160 --> 00:43:51,440 Speaker 2: history and about defense procurement, and this is one of 696 00:43:51,480 --> 00:43:54,520 Speaker 2: the arguments that the big defense giants have always made 697 00:43:54,520 --> 00:43:56,840 Speaker 2: in the past, which is, you know, you can't just 698 00:43:57,360 --> 00:44:00,800 Speaker 2: have their argument, and I find it there's some logic 699 00:44:00,840 --> 00:44:03,160 Speaker 2: behind it. You know, you can't just have big orders 700 00:44:03,200 --> 00:44:06,760 Speaker 2: come in during war and then all the orders go away, 701 00:44:07,880 --> 00:44:10,200 Speaker 2: you know, after the war is over, and then you know, 702 00:44:10,239 --> 00:44:13,279 Speaker 2: everyone gets a different job and the factories are dismantled 703 00:44:13,320 --> 00:44:16,799 Speaker 2: and stuff, because then, you you know, you lose that 704 00:44:16,920 --> 00:44:17,880 Speaker 2: institutional memory. 705 00:44:18,200 --> 00:44:21,160 Speaker 1: This is how the Jones Act happened. So after the 706 00:44:21,200 --> 00:44:23,560 Speaker 1: First World War, we had a surplus of ships, and 707 00:44:23,640 --> 00:44:26,279 Speaker 1: so everyone was like, well, we'll just restrict it to 708 00:44:26,440 --> 00:44:29,320 Speaker 1: US owned ships and everything will be fine. And then 709 00:44:29,560 --> 00:44:33,239 Speaker 1: you know, fast forward like one hundred years and we 710 00:44:33,280 --> 00:44:34,800 Speaker 1: don't have that surplus anymore. 711 00:44:35,400 --> 00:44:37,480 Speaker 2: This is a really good topic for us. We should 712 00:44:37,480 --> 00:44:38,040 Speaker 2: do more on this. 713 00:44:38,200 --> 00:44:39,680 Speaker 1: Do you like how I brought it full service? 714 00:44:39,800 --> 00:44:42,040 Speaker 5: Yes to the Jones well done? Yeah, thank you. 715 00:44:42,120 --> 00:44:44,080 Speaker 2: And one day we're going to do a Jones Act episode. 716 00:44:44,160 --> 00:44:45,400 Speaker 4: We will. There's a long. 717 00:44:45,280 --> 00:44:49,040 Speaker 2: Recurring joke that we've never done a Jones Act episode. 718 00:44:49,320 --> 00:44:50,400 Speaker 5: All right, shall we leave it there? 719 00:44:50,480 --> 00:44:51,200 Speaker 2: Let's leave it there. 720 00:44:51,400 --> 00:44:54,080 Speaker 1: This has been another episode of the All Thoughts Podcast. 721 00:44:54,160 --> 00:44:57,680 Speaker 1: I'm Tracy Alloway. You can follow me at Tracy Alloway. 722 00:44:57,400 --> 00:44:59,919 Speaker 2: And I'm Joe Wisenthal. You can follow me at the Stall. 723 00:45:00,480 --> 00:45:04,160 Speaker 2: Follow our guests Indiana Senator Todd Young, He's at Senn 724 00:45:04,320 --> 00:45:08,400 Speaker 2: Todd Young. Follow Senator Mark Kelly at sen Mark Kelly. 725 00:45:08,640 --> 00:45:11,680 Speaker 2: Follow our producers Kerman Rodriguez at Kerman Arman, dash Ol 726 00:45:11,680 --> 00:45:15,520 Speaker 2: Bennett at Dashbot and Kilbrooks at Kilbrooks. More odd Laws 727 00:45:15,560 --> 00:45:18,319 Speaker 2: content go to Bloomberg dot com slash odd Lots, where 728 00:45:18,320 --> 00:45:20,799 Speaker 2: we have transcripts, a blog, and a newsletter and you 729 00:45:20,800 --> 00:45:22,840 Speaker 2: can chat about all of these topics twenty four to 730 00:45:22,840 --> 00:45:26,800 Speaker 2: seven in our discord discord dot gg slash odlts. 731 00:45:27,080 --> 00:45:29,799 Speaker 1: And if you enjoy listening to odd Lots, if you 732 00:45:30,239 --> 00:45:33,160 Speaker 1: like Joe, get goosebumps when we talk about building big 733 00:45:33,200 --> 00:45:36,040 Speaker 1: ships then please leave us a positive review on your 734 00:45:36,080 --> 00:45:40,520 Speaker 1: favorite podcast platform. And remember, if you are a Bloomberg subscriber, 735 00:45:40,600 --> 00:45:43,040 Speaker 1: you can listen to all of our episodes. 736 00:45:42,640 --> 00:45:43,920 Speaker 5: Absolutely ad free. 737 00:45:44,080 --> 00:45:46,160 Speaker 1: All you need to do is find the Bloomberg channel 738 00:45:46,200 --> 00:45:48,879 Speaker 1: on Apple Podcasts and follow the instructions there. 739 00:45:49,280 --> 00:46:00,960 Speaker 5: Thanks for listening 740 00:46:06,840 --> 00:46:06,880 Speaker 7: In