WEBVTT - Special: President Trump in Europe

0:00:00.080 --> 0:00:12.960
<v Speaker 1>Ye, Welcome to the Bloomberg Surveillance Podcast. I'm Tom Keane

0:00:13.480 --> 0:00:17.560
<v Speaker 1>Jay Lee. We bring you insight from the best in economics, finance, investment,

0:00:18.000 --> 0:00:23.480
<v Speaker 1>and international relations. Find Bloomberg Surveillance on Apple Podcasts, SoundCloud,

0:00:23.600 --> 0:00:34.600
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg dot Com, and of course, on the Bloomberg John

0:00:34.720 --> 0:00:36.920
<v Speaker 1>us Now is a former US Ambassador to the EU.

0:00:37.000 --> 0:00:40.560
<v Speaker 1>He's Anthony Gardner Ambassador. When you look at everything that's happened,

0:00:40.560 --> 0:00:45.120
<v Speaker 1>we've lost seventy two hours. What does this mean for breaksit? Well,

0:00:45.159 --> 0:00:48.880
<v Speaker 1>first of all, it's unprecedented for a sitting president United

0:00:48.920 --> 0:00:52.120
<v Speaker 1>States during a state visit to attack and ally and

0:00:52.159 --> 0:00:55.400
<v Speaker 1>do it so publicly and endorse one of her rivals

0:00:55.440 --> 0:00:59.000
<v Speaker 1>for that position. It's unprecedented in its outrageous. The second

0:00:59.000 --> 0:01:01.440
<v Speaker 1>point it's an import is that the comments were just,

0:01:02.000 --> 0:01:05.200
<v Speaker 1>you know, not on the mark. A lot of US businesses,

0:01:05.240 --> 0:01:06.959
<v Speaker 1>as you know and use your viewers would know, have

0:01:07.040 --> 0:01:10.440
<v Speaker 1>invested in the UK as a gateway to Europe, just

0:01:10.520 --> 0:01:13.080
<v Speaker 1>like the Japanese have. So in fact, many of those

0:01:13.120 --> 0:01:16.760
<v Speaker 1>businesses want UK regulations to remain aligned with those of

0:01:16.800 --> 0:01:19.520
<v Speaker 1>the EU. The second point is important is that a

0:01:19.520 --> 0:01:22.520
<v Speaker 1>lot of the regulations that the US complains about and

0:01:22.600 --> 0:01:25.880
<v Speaker 1>that the President and Wilbert Ross wanted the UK to ditch.

0:01:26.360 --> 0:01:30.920
<v Speaker 1>Are those agricultural regulations that impede US exporters from selling

0:01:30.959 --> 0:01:34.640
<v Speaker 1>GMO products and hormone treated beefs on? Those things aren't

0:01:34.680 --> 0:01:37.640
<v Speaker 1>going to change. But I guess what I was trying

0:01:37.680 --> 0:01:40.360
<v Speaker 1>to get in my question is, you know, the President

0:01:40.400 --> 0:01:43.640
<v Speaker 1>of United States shows up saying maybe it's Boris Johnson

0:01:43.640 --> 0:01:47.560
<v Speaker 1>that should be Prime minister? Does the UK rally for

0:01:47.640 --> 0:01:50.200
<v Speaker 1>the prime minister? Does it actually make her stronger? I

0:01:50.240 --> 0:01:52.920
<v Speaker 1>think they probably will. We've seen a lot of reactions

0:01:52.920 --> 0:01:55.600
<v Speaker 1>so far, mostly from the Labor Party, but I think

0:01:55.680 --> 0:01:57.480
<v Speaker 1>we'll see a lot of reactions as well from the

0:01:57.520 --> 0:02:00.360
<v Speaker 1>Tory saying it's just not appropriate for president to be

0:02:00.440 --> 0:02:04.440
<v Speaker 1>interfering in the UK politics in this way. Ambassador, probably

0:02:04.560 --> 0:02:06.120
<v Speaker 1>all want to go to Venice and hide in the

0:02:06.600 --> 0:02:10.440
<v Speaker 1>Peggy looking On collection today, where you've provided leadership, that

0:02:10.480 --> 0:02:13.239
<v Speaker 1>would be a good place to get out of the storm.

0:02:13.320 --> 0:02:16.560
<v Speaker 1>You are one of the singular American voices, your cross

0:02:16.600 --> 0:02:21.480
<v Speaker 1>section of law and diplomacy as well in this cacophony

0:02:21.600 --> 0:02:26.200
<v Speaker 1>that we see here, How does Washington extract itself to

0:02:26.400 --> 0:02:29.640
<v Speaker 1>a president? Obama would say, and I would suggest President

0:02:29.639 --> 0:02:32.760
<v Speaker 1>Trump as well, to a better place out of the

0:02:33.000 --> 0:02:36.279
<v Speaker 1>endless and ceaseless noise that we have. What are Republicans

0:02:36.320 --> 0:02:38.800
<v Speaker 1>on the hill have to do? What are Democrats have

0:02:38.880 --> 0:02:41.760
<v Speaker 1>to do? What do these institutions have to do. That's

0:02:41.800 --> 0:02:44.080
<v Speaker 1>a great question and there is no clear answer to it.

0:02:44.120 --> 0:02:46.560
<v Speaker 1>But this is my answer to your question. I think

0:02:46.639 --> 0:02:48.960
<v Speaker 1>US business does have to speak up. Now. This is

0:02:49.000 --> 0:02:50.920
<v Speaker 1>not a part of an issue. This is important, it

0:02:51.040 --> 0:02:52.760
<v Speaker 1>is not a part as an issue. Just to ask

0:02:52.800 --> 0:02:56.200
<v Speaker 1>the question, how is any of this advancing US interests,

0:02:56.240 --> 0:03:00.919
<v Speaker 1>particularly US business interests? When we withdraw from international trade,

0:03:00.919 --> 0:03:04.720
<v Speaker 1>When the EU sets its standards globally, including an agriculture

0:03:04.720 --> 0:03:07.880
<v Speaker 1>on data protection wise and we're not, how does it

0:03:07.919 --> 0:03:10.760
<v Speaker 1>advance US interests? Two days after Brexit, Francie and I

0:03:10.800 --> 0:03:13.440
<v Speaker 1>were still trying to get through the debris that that

0:03:13.600 --> 0:03:17.959
<v Speaker 1>evening and into the next morning. I remember ubs purchased

0:03:17.960 --> 0:03:20.560
<v Speaker 1>a property or went from least to ownership or whatever

0:03:20.800 --> 0:03:23.240
<v Speaker 1>on the River Thames. We're going to hear from James

0:03:23.240 --> 0:03:26.880
<v Speaker 1>Diamond today and is JP Morgan earnings. What does someone

0:03:26.960 --> 0:03:31.239
<v Speaker 1>like Jamie Diamond have to say to suggest to President

0:03:31.280 --> 0:03:36.000
<v Speaker 1>Trump this behavior, this tabloid is not in the best

0:03:36.120 --> 0:03:39.200
<v Speaker 1>interests of all What does Jamie have to do well?

0:03:39.240 --> 0:03:42.000
<v Speaker 1>The basic point is remember who your allies are and

0:03:42.040 --> 0:03:45.280
<v Speaker 1>who your enemies are. Let's stop confusing the two. We

0:03:45.360 --> 0:03:49.000
<v Speaker 1>need to work with our allies, including the European Union,

0:03:49.600 --> 0:03:53.160
<v Speaker 1>who are natural partners at advancing our interests, particularly on trade.

0:03:53.200 --> 0:03:56.080
<v Speaker 1>On the business interests or your viewers are particularly interested in.

0:03:56.400 --> 0:03:59.880
<v Speaker 1>That means, for example, identifying the issues where the presidents

0:04:00.040 --> 0:04:05.760
<v Speaker 1>correctly identified as being problematic IP theft market access to

0:04:06.000 --> 0:04:08.720
<v Speaker 1>various countries, not only China. We should be working with

0:04:08.800 --> 0:04:11.240
<v Speaker 1>the EU as we have been in the past on

0:04:11.280 --> 0:04:13.320
<v Speaker 1>those issues, rather than being at war with the EU

0:04:13.440 --> 0:04:16.080
<v Speaker 1>on cars and on aluminum and on steel. That's the

0:04:16.080 --> 0:04:19.400
<v Speaker 1>basic point, right, But a mess this helps with his popularity. Right.

0:04:19.960 --> 0:04:23.320
<v Speaker 1>We're close to the midterm elections, so actually America going

0:04:23.320 --> 0:04:26.040
<v Speaker 1>out of a loan a strong man president that can

0:04:26.120 --> 0:04:29.400
<v Speaker 1>get a deal with China sounds better than going through

0:04:29.440 --> 0:04:31.279
<v Speaker 1>allies in Europe and trying to figure out what we

0:04:31.320 --> 0:04:33.640
<v Speaker 1>do with I p Yes, but that's short term thinking.

0:04:33.720 --> 0:04:35.600
<v Speaker 1>I think businesses should be in the business of mid

0:04:35.800 --> 0:04:38.919
<v Speaker 1>term and long term thinking as well. Um and we

0:04:38.960 --> 0:04:42.320
<v Speaker 1>will soon see the consequences of a potentially a trillion

0:04:42.320 --> 0:04:45.160
<v Speaker 1>dollar trade war on US exporters. A lot of people

0:04:45.200 --> 0:04:48.000
<v Speaker 1>are assuming that this is just negotiating tactics. Right. The

0:04:48.040 --> 0:04:51.680
<v Speaker 1>President knows what he's doing. He's a good negotiator, successful businessman.

0:04:51.880 --> 0:04:55.240
<v Speaker 1>It'll all sort itself out. Be careful about that kind

0:04:55.240 --> 0:04:58.480
<v Speaker 1>of you know thinking, because I don't see a strategy

0:04:58.520 --> 0:05:01.880
<v Speaker 1>behind this. Businesses need to warren as President Isabelle. What's

0:05:02.040 --> 0:05:05.280
<v Speaker 1>precedent in the markets? Do markets need to warn President Trump?

0:05:05.839 --> 0:05:08.320
<v Speaker 1>I think they do. Another, I think they are and

0:05:08.360 --> 0:05:10.840
<v Speaker 1>in fact we're I'm sure again we're going to hear

0:05:10.839 --> 0:05:14.279
<v Speaker 1>in the earnings called some some some stronger language from

0:05:14.320 --> 0:05:16.680
<v Speaker 1>from the corporate world that that came out clearly from

0:05:16.720 --> 0:05:20.240
<v Speaker 1>the five minutes that were published last week. The businesses

0:05:20.240 --> 0:05:23.480
<v Speaker 1>are beginning to to speak. And as I was saying earlier,

0:05:23.480 --> 0:05:26.640
<v Speaker 1>the markets, you know, are pricing in a much higher

0:05:27.200 --> 0:05:29.680
<v Speaker 1>risk premium in every asset class under the sun than

0:05:29.720 --> 0:05:31.799
<v Speaker 1>they did last year. Why is that? It's in large

0:05:31.800 --> 0:05:35.760
<v Speaker 1>part because of all this uncertainty that that the US

0:05:36.000 --> 0:05:38.920
<v Speaker 1>policies have been creating. In your government studies at Harvard

0:05:39.000 --> 0:05:42.000
<v Speaker 1>and then on to Oxford and the Columbia law all

0:05:42.040 --> 0:05:45.480
<v Speaker 1>the track of Anthony Gardner. What I find so important

0:05:45.520 --> 0:05:49.000
<v Speaker 1>here is you know, an event after event, the unpredictable happens.

0:05:49.720 --> 0:05:53.359
<v Speaker 1>Are we set up right now for the unpredictable abilities

0:05:53.360 --> 0:05:57.680
<v Speaker 1>that we heard financially, what we saw out of the

0:05:57.720 --> 0:06:01.960
<v Speaker 1>Soviet Union? Are we at that instability within Europe right now? Well,

0:06:02.000 --> 0:06:05.279
<v Speaker 1>we're sending a lot of negative signals, and signals communication

0:06:05.360 --> 0:06:08.039
<v Speaker 1>and words matter. Even if all of this is sorted out,

0:06:08.360 --> 0:06:10.919
<v Speaker 1>we're sending dangerous signals about how the president is at

0:06:11.000 --> 0:06:15.159
<v Speaker 1>least ambivalent about our alliances NATO in the EU. That's dangerous.

0:06:15.200 --> 0:06:18.880
<v Speaker 1>Look at historical historical evidence. Are the Baltic states at

0:06:18.960 --> 0:06:20.719
<v Speaker 1>risk here? I mean we're talking about Georgia and the

0:06:20.720 --> 0:06:23.240
<v Speaker 1>rest of the tangential in Ukraine. Are the Baltic states

0:06:23.320 --> 0:06:25.400
<v Speaker 1>at risk? I think they feel that they're at risk,

0:06:25.640 --> 0:06:28.919
<v Speaker 1>and it empowers those who believe that those frontline states

0:06:29.080 --> 0:06:31.680
<v Speaker 1>actually may not be defended at a time of need.

0:06:32.160 --> 0:06:37.360
<v Speaker 1>Let's look at historical experience. When both sides mobilized, there

0:06:37.400 --> 0:06:39.760
<v Speaker 1>comes a point when it's very hard to withdraw. I'm

0:06:39.760 --> 0:06:41.680
<v Speaker 1>talking about the trade war here. We are at an

0:06:41.720 --> 0:06:44.720
<v Speaker 1>inflection point. Very good, Let's come back, Combassador Gardener, where

0:06:44.720 --> 0:06:47.279
<v Speaker 1>this and we will continue, and of course Isabelle Lago

0:06:47.640 --> 0:06:50.880
<v Speaker 1>as well from black Rock. This wonderful conversation to get

0:06:50.920 --> 0:07:09.000
<v Speaker 1>the day started. In London. Alex Wayne is the guy

0:07:09.240 --> 0:07:13.720
<v Speaker 1>in the trenches who takes all the different copy from

0:07:13.760 --> 0:07:18.080
<v Speaker 1>the reporters and makes it ready for Bloomberg News, Bloomberg

0:07:18.080 --> 0:07:21.560
<v Speaker 1>dot Com and of course for how many sources that

0:07:21.760 --> 0:07:26.000
<v Speaker 1>uses worldwide. We've dragged him away. He's working his phone here, Lisa.

0:07:26.120 --> 0:07:28.880
<v Speaker 1>It's embarrassing. His phone looks like he dropped it four

0:07:28.920 --> 0:07:31.560
<v Speaker 1>times in a bar last night. But you're glued to

0:07:31.600 --> 0:07:34.800
<v Speaker 1>the phone with nine reporters right now. What are the

0:07:34.800 --> 0:07:38.200
<v Speaker 1>people in checkers saying? It's pretty quiet up there? You know?

0:07:38.280 --> 0:07:40.960
<v Speaker 1>He's he played down the Sun interview when he when

0:07:40.960 --> 0:07:42.640
<v Speaker 1>he met with May, he said they have a very

0:07:42.720 --> 0:07:47.200
<v Speaker 1>very strong relationship. May was we couldn't we couldn't hear

0:07:47.320 --> 0:07:49.480
<v Speaker 1>very well for one thing. But she she, she seemed

0:07:49.560 --> 0:07:52.440
<v Speaker 1>like and they seemed to be getting along. Account helber Adi,

0:07:52.480 --> 0:07:55.600
<v Speaker 1>it's you're based in London or Washington. I'm based in Washington.

0:07:56.400 --> 0:07:59.720
<v Speaker 1>Based in Washington. There's the Washington Post, in the New

0:07:59.800 --> 0:08:02.560
<v Speaker 1>York Times, in Bloomberg News, and I love two days

0:08:02.560 --> 0:08:07.200
<v Speaker 1>this week Mike Allen and Axios led twice with Bloomberg copy.

0:08:07.640 --> 0:08:11.400
<v Speaker 1>Everybody's grinding it out. But the tabloid thing, I mean,

0:08:11.400 --> 0:08:14.760
<v Speaker 1>you're a pro journalist. I'm just pretending. The bottom line,

0:08:14.800 --> 0:08:19.840
<v Speaker 1>Alex is the tabloid tone in the United Kingdom is

0:08:19.920 --> 0:08:23.360
<v Speaker 1>way different than Washington and frankly way different than Mr

0:08:23.440 --> 0:08:26.520
<v Speaker 1>Murdock's New York Post as well. What did you think

0:08:26.560 --> 0:08:31.640
<v Speaker 1>of the presentation of the interview by the Sun. Uh,

0:08:31.680 --> 0:08:33.800
<v Speaker 1>you know, I've actually enjoyed it reading as a as

0:08:33.800 --> 0:08:35.959
<v Speaker 1>a reader, I found it a pretty pleasurable experience and

0:08:36.040 --> 0:08:38.160
<v Speaker 1>just kept going on and on and giving and giving

0:08:38.200 --> 0:08:40.280
<v Speaker 1>more and more. Now they do some stuff on their

0:08:40.280 --> 0:08:42.839
<v Speaker 1>website with ads and things that are a little distracting,

0:08:42.920 --> 0:08:44.920
<v Speaker 1>and uh and but I but I did like the

0:08:44.920 --> 0:08:46.640
<v Speaker 1>way they organized it. They sort of broke it up

0:08:46.640 --> 0:08:50.200
<v Speaker 1>into different sections with pictures, and you know, he covered

0:08:50.200 --> 0:08:54.840
<v Speaker 1>a lot of ground with them. Three right, one of

0:08:54.880 --> 0:08:57.880
<v Speaker 1>my at least, so one of my producers, Bowden ripped,

0:08:58.080 --> 0:09:00.560
<v Speaker 1>I go, where's page three? And he goes ripped it

0:09:00.559 --> 0:09:02.520
<v Speaker 1>out and I said why, he said, shut up? Time,

0:09:02.600 --> 0:09:07.120
<v Speaker 1>just go on. I love I love the the u

0:09:07.240 --> 0:09:09.480
<v Speaker 1>S analysis of the Sun. There were a lot of

0:09:09.559 --> 0:09:11.720
<v Speaker 1>nice pictures. No, Alex, I do want to get a

0:09:11.720 --> 0:09:15.600
<v Speaker 1>sense of the broader implications here of President Trump going

0:09:15.720 --> 0:09:19.280
<v Speaker 1>after Theresa May and frankly showing a lot of affection

0:09:19.320 --> 0:09:22.480
<v Speaker 1>towards barn Boris Johnson Um and sort of saying, if

0:09:22.640 --> 0:09:25.000
<v Speaker 1>you know that the Brexit deal that Theresa May is

0:09:25.040 --> 0:09:27.520
<v Speaker 1>putting out there isn't what the US is talking about,

0:09:28.120 --> 0:09:31.280
<v Speaker 1>isn't what the the UK isn't what the UK population

0:09:31.360 --> 0:09:34.240
<v Speaker 1>voted for in the U S could potentially cut its trade,

0:09:34.480 --> 0:09:37.800
<v Speaker 1>some of its trade relationships or deals. Why what is

0:09:37.840 --> 0:09:41.520
<v Speaker 1>this significant not only for Britain but just in terms

0:09:41.640 --> 0:09:48.760
<v Speaker 1>of President Trump's sentiment right now? Short answer, No, not really, alright,

0:09:49.120 --> 0:09:52.000
<v Speaker 1>you know everybody everybody in the UK is very exercised

0:09:52.000 --> 0:09:54.680
<v Speaker 1>about the interview. Oh my gosh, he cut Theresa Mays

0:09:54.679 --> 0:09:57.600
<v Speaker 1>at knees out from underneath her. It's probably helpful for

0:09:57.760 --> 0:10:00.200
<v Speaker 1>I mean, he's not very popular in the UK, not

0:10:00.280 --> 0:10:03.160
<v Speaker 1>very popular in the US. Uh. If he's attacking the

0:10:03.160 --> 0:10:05.000
<v Speaker 1>Prime minister, I think that probably makes a lot of

0:10:05.000 --> 0:10:07.800
<v Speaker 1>Britain sympathetic toward her position. Hold on one second, this

0:10:07.880 --> 0:10:10.320
<v Speaker 1>is actually really important. We need to highlight this. You're

0:10:10.360 --> 0:10:13.240
<v Speaker 1>saying that by President Trump trying to cut down the

0:10:13.600 --> 0:10:16.560
<v Speaker 1>UK Prime Minister Theresa May. He's actually giving her more

0:10:16.720 --> 0:10:19.640
<v Speaker 1>clout with the population and could potentially give her more

0:10:19.720 --> 0:10:23.800
<v Speaker 1>power heading into Brexit negotiations. I think he could help

0:10:23.800 --> 0:10:26.240
<v Speaker 1>ear and I have a feeling she has a has

0:10:26.280 --> 0:10:29.040
<v Speaker 1>her finger closer to the pulse of what what Britain's

0:10:29.120 --> 0:10:33.160
<v Speaker 1>want and a Brexit deal than he does. When we

0:10:33.200 --> 0:10:36.719
<v Speaker 1>look at Kevin's really coming here. Was traveled with the

0:10:36.840 --> 0:10:40.800
<v Speaker 1>president since the very beginning. Wait, you know when nobody

0:10:41.040 --> 0:10:44.679
<v Speaker 1>thought he would be even his supporters think he'd become president.

0:10:45.000 --> 0:10:47.880
<v Speaker 1>In the grind that you're in, alex Wayne every day,

0:10:47.920 --> 0:10:51.560
<v Speaker 1>how has the president changed in the last year? And

0:10:51.600 --> 0:10:54.960
<v Speaker 1>then in the day to day grind, what do you observe?

0:10:55.640 --> 0:10:57.440
<v Speaker 1>Is he the same as he was a year ago?

0:10:58.000 --> 0:11:02.800
<v Speaker 1>Or has it been changes? Man? That's deep? Um you

0:11:03.120 --> 0:11:07.360
<v Speaker 1>do this Friday? Also, I went to a Croatian bar

0:11:07.480 --> 0:11:12.600
<v Speaker 1>last night, so seriously changed. I think his his relationship

0:11:12.679 --> 0:11:17.840
<v Speaker 1>with the press has gotten more complex. Uh, And I

0:11:17.880 --> 0:11:21.400
<v Speaker 1>think I think that this Annapolis shooting recently kind of

0:11:21.400 --> 0:11:25.320
<v Speaker 1>put a put a sort of highlighted that, Um he

0:11:25.520 --> 0:11:28.360
<v Speaker 1>you know, he's always demonized us in front of his

0:11:28.400 --> 0:11:30.679
<v Speaker 1>supporters and then dealt with us on the back end.

0:11:30.800 --> 0:11:34.160
<v Speaker 1>But uh, you know, he's he's been spending a lot

0:11:34.200 --> 0:11:36.400
<v Speaker 1>of time with us lately on all these foreign trips.

0:11:36.760 --> 0:11:41.400
<v Speaker 1>Um he's been. There's been a lot of lengthy conference

0:11:42.040 --> 0:11:43.880
<v Speaker 1>was and now he didn't give us much notice about

0:11:43.920 --> 0:11:47.280
<v Speaker 1>the press. But quickly here he spoke nicely to Margaret

0:11:47.280 --> 0:11:49.440
<v Speaker 1>to love as well. He did what was stunning he did,

0:11:49.480 --> 0:11:52.679
<v Speaker 1>he did, He's he's uh, he seems he's developed a

0:11:52.679 --> 0:11:54.839
<v Speaker 1>relationship with Margaret, with Jennifer Jacobs, with some of the

0:11:54.880 --> 0:11:59.520
<v Speaker 1>other reporters. Um, So you know, I think he's Even

0:11:59.520 --> 0:12:02.560
<v Speaker 1>when he was ripping us at his rallies, I thought

0:12:02.640 --> 0:12:06.760
<v Speaker 1>it was mostly for show. It's it's really become quite clearly.

0:12:06.920 --> 0:12:09.440
<v Speaker 1>And I want you to stay here, but your entourages

0:12:09.480 --> 0:12:12.079
<v Speaker 1>out through the window of our London studios saying Mr

0:12:12.120 --> 0:12:14.800
<v Speaker 1>Wayne has to go back to his real job. Alex Wayne,

0:12:14.800 --> 0:12:17.040
<v Speaker 1>thank you so much, folks. It's just a window into

0:12:17.120 --> 0:12:32.080
<v Speaker 1>our lead editor of our Brexit team. We drive forward

0:12:32.080 --> 0:12:34.599
<v Speaker 1>our conversation on Bloomberg surveillance, as we did it with

0:12:34.640 --> 0:12:37.920
<v Speaker 1>Ambassador Gardener in the last hour, with another ambassador from

0:12:37.960 --> 0:12:41.280
<v Speaker 1>the United Kingdom and their former ambassador of the United States,

0:12:41.320 --> 0:12:45.320
<v Speaker 1>also serving as ambassador to France and to Turkey as well.

0:12:45.559 --> 0:12:48.160
<v Speaker 1>Peter Wassmancutt joining us this morning, Ambassador, thank you so

0:12:48.240 --> 0:12:52.480
<v Speaker 1>much for finding time on this just exceptionally unique day.

0:12:52.840 --> 0:12:56.320
<v Speaker 1>As well. There is a moment in the John Adams

0:12:56.320 --> 0:13:00.360
<v Speaker 1>television series where the acclaimed actor Paul Giamati is Johnny

0:13:00.360 --> 0:13:03.600
<v Speaker 1>Adams goes in to meet the king after the Revolution.

0:13:04.040 --> 0:13:07.960
<v Speaker 1>Stunning scene, at least for ugly Americans like me. He

0:13:08.160 --> 0:13:11.000
<v Speaker 1>backs out of the room. Now, I'm assuming the President

0:13:11.040 --> 0:13:13.280
<v Speaker 1>will not back out of the room today were the

0:13:13.360 --> 0:13:16.640
<v Speaker 1>queen when they have tea. But after what we've seen

0:13:16.760 --> 0:13:20.560
<v Speaker 1>in this tabloid, how will the Queen of England greet

0:13:20.559 --> 0:13:24.800
<v Speaker 1>this President of the United States. The Queen has a

0:13:24.800 --> 0:13:27.880
<v Speaker 1>lot of experience of dealing with visiting statesman she's met,

0:13:27.920 --> 0:13:29.800
<v Speaker 1>and a a lot of presidents post to the United

0:13:29.840 --> 0:13:34.080
<v Speaker 1>States and elsewhere. My hunch from my own experience is

0:13:34.120 --> 0:13:37.360
<v Speaker 1>that this will be super correct. It will be cordial.

0:13:37.880 --> 0:13:42.360
<v Speaker 1>There will be conversation about relatively unpolitical issues. I would

0:13:42.400 --> 0:13:45.120
<v Speaker 1>be surprised if her Majesty asks about, you know, the

0:13:45.160 --> 0:13:47.920
<v Speaker 1>Sun editorial and so on, But but who knows. So

0:13:48.080 --> 0:13:50.880
<v Speaker 1>I think this is a meeting, which is which is

0:13:50.960 --> 0:13:54.640
<v Speaker 1>largely a courtesy t at the Castle of windsor give

0:13:54.720 --> 0:13:56.559
<v Speaker 1>great pleasure to the first lady. I'm sure it will

0:13:56.600 --> 0:13:58.320
<v Speaker 1>give great pleasure to the President. But this is not

0:13:58.400 --> 0:14:00.160
<v Speaker 1>a conversation I don't think, which is like did to

0:14:00.200 --> 0:14:02.720
<v Speaker 1>go into the substance in any great depth? Will the

0:14:02.840 --> 0:14:06.559
<v Speaker 1>nation rally around the Prime minister after what we've seen here?

0:14:06.640 --> 0:14:10.800
<v Speaker 1>Will labor Tory? Will people not attached the politics? Will

0:14:10.840 --> 0:14:13.600
<v Speaker 1>they rally around the Prime Minister? Well, I think there's

0:14:13.600 --> 0:14:16.480
<v Speaker 1>a sense that this is a pretty unpleasant payback to

0:14:16.520 --> 0:14:18.760
<v Speaker 1>the Prime Minister who's gone out of her way to

0:14:18.880 --> 0:14:23.320
<v Speaker 1>give Donald Trump almost in all the detail, an equivalent

0:14:23.320 --> 0:14:25.080
<v Speaker 1>of a state visit without him being a state visit.

0:14:25.560 --> 0:14:29.520
<v Speaker 1>Red carpet, blendim palace, tea with the Queen, all the

0:14:29.520 --> 0:14:31.920
<v Speaker 1>other stuff which has been laid on, And this is

0:14:31.920 --> 0:14:33.880
<v Speaker 1>a bit of a kick in the teeth, frankly to

0:14:33.920 --> 0:14:36.400
<v Speaker 1>the Prime Minister. I don't know what it's designed to achieve.

0:14:36.960 --> 0:14:39.160
<v Speaker 1>I noticed that the President was not kind of renting.

0:14:39.240 --> 0:14:41.960
<v Speaker 1>He was calm and deliberate while he was giving an interview.

0:14:42.360 --> 0:14:44.880
<v Speaker 1>Was it something he had been encouraged to do in

0:14:45.000 --> 0:14:48.760
<v Speaker 1>order to strengthen the hard Brexit is here in British

0:14:48.800 --> 0:14:51.680
<v Speaker 1>domestic politics. Was it something she decided to do because

0:14:51.680 --> 0:14:53.440
<v Speaker 1>it was the opposite of what President Obama had done,

0:14:53.440 --> 0:14:56.240
<v Speaker 1>which was to come to London and support UM not

0:14:56.280 --> 0:14:59.360
<v Speaker 1>doing Brexit at David Cameron's request, and he decided he

0:14:59.400 --> 0:15:02.000
<v Speaker 1>would come to then Um and take the opposite view,

0:15:02.280 --> 0:15:04.720
<v Speaker 1>mind you, this time undermining the prime minister of the country,

0:15:04.840 --> 0:15:07.560
<v Speaker 1>not supporting the prime minister country. I do not know,

0:15:07.960 --> 0:15:09.800
<v Speaker 1>but I think we are in we are in different

0:15:09.840 --> 0:15:12.360
<v Speaker 1>territory and it's not helpful to the prime minister position,

0:15:12.480 --> 0:15:14.720
<v Speaker 1>and there could be some sort of a backlash saying,

0:15:14.840 --> 0:15:16.720
<v Speaker 1>you know what, whether we agree or whether we don't

0:15:16.720 --> 0:15:19.280
<v Speaker 1>agree what she's trying to do. This is not fair, right,

0:15:19.360 --> 0:15:22.960
<v Speaker 1>But is she also weakened by it? I'm not sure

0:15:23.000 --> 0:15:24.800
<v Speaker 1>that I can. I don't have a view on that yet.

0:15:24.840 --> 0:15:27.440
<v Speaker 1>I think we wait to see. Initially, I think she's

0:15:27.480 --> 0:15:30.080
<v Speaker 1>a bit weakened because what it does is point out

0:15:30.160 --> 0:15:33.280
<v Speaker 1>the contradictions which we all know are unresolved within the

0:15:33.320 --> 0:15:36.880
<v Speaker 1>government's position on how to handle Brexit. When President Trump

0:15:36.920 --> 0:15:39.280
<v Speaker 1>says BI natural trade deal with neither the States is off,

0:15:39.400 --> 0:15:40.920
<v Speaker 1>I think he's a little out of date because he's

0:15:40.920 --> 0:15:43.560
<v Speaker 1>looking at the time when the Brexit package appeared to

0:15:43.600 --> 0:15:45.800
<v Speaker 1>be one which excluded the right for the UK to

0:15:45.880 --> 0:15:48.160
<v Speaker 1>have any bilactural free trade agreements. The Prime Minister has

0:15:48.160 --> 0:15:50.760
<v Speaker 1>since been in Parliament saying, actually it doesn't we can

0:15:50.800 --> 0:15:54.440
<v Speaker 1>negotiate those free trade agreements. So whether she's weak or not,

0:15:54.480 --> 0:15:56.680
<v Speaker 1>I don't know, but I don't think this helps the

0:15:56.720 --> 0:15:58.920
<v Speaker 1>relationship and the perception of Donald Trump here in the

0:15:58.960 --> 0:16:01.880
<v Speaker 1>United Kingdom. Okay, Is it because Donald Trump actually sees

0:16:01.880 --> 0:16:06.680
<v Speaker 1>parallels between Brexit and his own election? Is that why

0:16:06.720 --> 0:16:08.760
<v Speaker 1>he's weighing in or is it because he's simply friends

0:16:08.760 --> 0:16:12.720
<v Speaker 1>with Boris Johnson. I think in one sense we're seeing

0:16:12.800 --> 0:16:16.120
<v Speaker 1>his preference for bilateral deals. He doesn't like multilateral doesn't

0:16:16.160 --> 0:16:19.320
<v Speaker 1>like NATO, EU, all those countries coming together, and he

0:16:19.360 --> 0:16:22.480
<v Speaker 1>thought the answer was a deal between himself and the UK,

0:16:22.600 --> 0:16:25.280
<v Speaker 1>and he saw that perhaps disappearing. I think that's part

0:16:25.280 --> 0:16:28.000
<v Speaker 1>of it. The Boris Johnson thing puzzles me because bald

0:16:28.480 --> 0:16:31.000
<v Speaker 1>Boris Johnson was one of the British politicians who was

0:16:31.120 --> 0:16:33.880
<v Speaker 1>rudest about Donald Trump during the campaign. Since then, he's

0:16:33.880 --> 0:16:36.400
<v Speaker 1>been flattering him, saying how marvelous he is, so obviously

0:16:36.440 --> 0:16:39.400
<v Speaker 1>something has changed in that relationship. Beyond that, does he

0:16:39.440 --> 0:16:43.000
<v Speaker 1>really think Boris Johnson gonna become Prime Minister? Hut. We

0:16:43.040 --> 0:16:45.400
<v Speaker 1>want to come back and continue this discussion. But you

0:16:45.440 --> 0:16:48.640
<v Speaker 1>are one of the few people alive today understand the

0:16:48.760 --> 0:16:53.720
<v Speaker 1>special relationship of the United Kingdom in France where you served,

0:16:54.040 --> 0:16:57.520
<v Speaker 1>in the United States where you served. This triangle of

0:16:57.640 --> 0:17:01.880
<v Speaker 1>three centuries of relationship is really at risk here. How

0:17:01.880 --> 0:17:05.600
<v Speaker 1>do we extricate ourselves from this moment to get back

0:17:05.640 --> 0:17:09.160
<v Speaker 1>to what the United Kingdom, France and America once had.

0:17:10.560 --> 0:17:13.439
<v Speaker 1>It's an extraordinary good question. When I was in Paris,

0:17:14.160 --> 0:17:16.879
<v Speaker 1>there was an element of the bilateral relationship being special

0:17:16.920 --> 0:17:21.600
<v Speaker 1>and entente cordial, and some British politicians wanted to focus

0:17:21.640 --> 0:17:24.399
<v Speaker 1>exclusively on the United States. The French saw it a

0:17:24.400 --> 0:17:27.280
<v Speaker 1>bit more triangular. My own view was that with Britain

0:17:27.280 --> 0:17:30.240
<v Speaker 1>and France the only two serious European powers in defense

0:17:30.280 --> 0:17:32.879
<v Speaker 1>and intelligence and so on, that it was important for

0:17:32.920 --> 0:17:34.760
<v Speaker 1>all three of us to work together. And when you

0:17:34.760 --> 0:17:37.600
<v Speaker 1>look at the moment when we countries of the leaders

0:17:37.640 --> 0:17:39.080
<v Speaker 1>of the free world, if you like hav Inter been

0:17:39.119 --> 0:17:41.600
<v Speaker 1>militarily often, the three of us have been in there

0:17:41.680 --> 0:17:43.840
<v Speaker 1>Iraq being a great exception, of course, back in two

0:17:43.840 --> 0:17:48.359
<v Speaker 1>thousand and three. So getting this relationship working again very important.

0:17:48.440 --> 0:17:50.920
<v Speaker 1>I think President Emmanuel Macros has done a very good

0:17:50.960 --> 0:17:53.280
<v Speaker 1>job of Matt. He has stood up to Donald Trump.

0:17:53.280 --> 0:17:56.199
<v Speaker 1>He has also lavished praise on him. He's had him

0:17:56.240 --> 0:17:58.880
<v Speaker 1>to Paris for the vast Year Days celebrations. But he's

0:17:58.920 --> 0:18:00.879
<v Speaker 1>also just are you with him when he's needed to

0:18:00.960 --> 0:18:03.040
<v Speaker 1>do so. Theresa May has done so because there've been

0:18:03.160 --> 0:18:06.520
<v Speaker 1>numerous occasions when British and French views on international affairs

0:18:06.560 --> 0:18:09.720
<v Speaker 1>have been contradicted or even undermined by President Trump. So

0:18:09.920 --> 0:18:11.719
<v Speaker 1>we have to get that relationship back. It's a very

0:18:11.720 --> 0:18:13.800
<v Speaker 1>good point to make. How we do it remains to

0:18:13.840 --> 0:18:15.879
<v Speaker 1>be seen. Peter Westcott, thank you so much. He's, of

0:18:15.920 --> 0:18:31.679
<v Speaker 1>course a former UK ambassador to the US. We need

0:18:31.760 --> 0:18:33.920
<v Speaker 1>not to go to the White House and our Kevin

0:18:34.000 --> 0:18:38.680
<v Speaker 1>Sally Kevin a press conference with a certain level of joviality.

0:18:39.200 --> 0:18:42.240
<v Speaker 1>Have you ever seen him say I'm not going to

0:18:42.359 --> 0:18:45.080
<v Speaker 1>take a question from CNN? Was that a first or

0:18:45.160 --> 0:18:48.480
<v Speaker 1>is that business as usual for you animals that cover

0:18:48.560 --> 0:18:52.440
<v Speaker 1>the president? Business as usual? Business as usual? Look, and

0:18:52.800 --> 0:18:56.480
<v Speaker 1>obviously we should know our our intrepid colleagues with PNN.

0:18:56.840 --> 0:18:59.560
<v Speaker 1>You great work over there, But but I want to

0:18:59.600 --> 0:19:03.960
<v Speaker 1>make a here because it's fascinating to note that after

0:19:04.080 --> 0:19:07.520
<v Speaker 1>that black high affair yesterday, President Trump, as he left

0:19:07.960 --> 0:19:10.719
<v Speaker 1>that that dinner with the UK Prime Minister Theresa May

0:19:11.119 --> 0:19:15.159
<v Speaker 1>see Rupert Murdoch owned The Sun published this uh, this

0:19:15.359 --> 0:19:19.280
<v Speaker 1>interview uh, and as it was made public, flash forward

0:19:19.320 --> 0:19:22.800
<v Speaker 1>to this morning and loving when the President says that

0:19:22.920 --> 0:19:26.520
<v Speaker 1>he apologized to the UK Prime Minister and she brushed

0:19:26.560 --> 0:19:28.840
<v Speaker 1>it off and said, quote unquote, this is just the press.

0:19:29.400 --> 0:19:33.240
<v Speaker 1>So it was an interesting display and an illustration of

0:19:33.400 --> 0:19:37.120
<v Speaker 1>how the special relationship between the US and the UK

0:19:37.840 --> 0:19:42.280
<v Speaker 1>has evolved in the Trump era. Also note that, more importantly,

0:19:42.359 --> 0:19:45.800
<v Speaker 1>from a policy standpoint, UK Prime Minister Theresa May saying

0:19:45.840 --> 0:19:48.880
<v Speaker 1>that President Trump is going into the July sixty meeting

0:19:48.920 --> 0:19:51.800
<v Speaker 1>with President Who in hell Sinky from a quote unquote

0:19:52.080 --> 0:19:56.240
<v Speaker 1>position of strength and a unified NATO, the President saying

0:19:56.280 --> 0:19:59.719
<v Speaker 1>that he secured thirty four billion dollars additional funding Canado.

0:20:00.640 --> 0:20:04.879
<v Speaker 1>Oh within that, Kevin, is the preparation, preparation for what

0:20:05.040 --> 0:20:08.560
<v Speaker 1>you and I will see monday in Helsinki. Tell us

0:20:08.640 --> 0:20:13.320
<v Speaker 1>what's different about the preparation for this summit from any

0:20:13.400 --> 0:20:16.800
<v Speaker 1>other big meeting that President Trump would have. There were

0:20:16.880 --> 0:20:21.520
<v Speaker 1>certainly the preparation for the Singapore summit. What's different and

0:20:21.720 --> 0:20:26.560
<v Speaker 1>how he's preparing the expectations. The President said point blank

0:20:26.640 --> 0:20:30.359
<v Speaker 1>that he doesn't have high expectations that he's the administration

0:20:30.480 --> 0:20:33.399
<v Speaker 1>is really going out of its way to manage expectations

0:20:33.880 --> 0:20:37.600
<v Speaker 1>with this President Trump and President Putin meeting, the President

0:20:37.680 --> 0:20:40.720
<v Speaker 1>saying that he barely knows President Putin, that he's only

0:20:40.800 --> 0:20:43.760
<v Speaker 1>met with him to two and a half times his work,

0:20:44.119 --> 0:20:45.680
<v Speaker 1>his counting, I don't know how you need someone to

0:20:45.680 --> 0:20:48.680
<v Speaker 1>have fun, but uh, and I think that from a

0:20:48.800 --> 0:20:52.600
<v Speaker 1>from an agenda standpoint. More importantly, senior administration officials as

0:20:52.640 --> 0:20:55.000
<v Speaker 1>well as the President saying that the main topics the

0:20:55.080 --> 0:21:00.440
<v Speaker 1>conversation will be UH, disarmament, UH, Ukraine, Syria, and yes

0:21:00.560 --> 0:21:04.439
<v Speaker 1>election medally on the issue of crimea, particularly from an

0:21:04.560 --> 0:21:08.840
<v Speaker 1>energy sector standpoint, tom the President did not forecast at

0:21:08.920 --> 0:21:12.480
<v Speaker 1>all during this press conference when he was repeatedly asked

0:21:12.680 --> 0:21:16.440
<v Speaker 1>what his policy would be, or how he or what

0:21:16.600 --> 0:21:20.520
<v Speaker 1>outcome even he is hoping to articulate the President Photin

0:21:20.600 --> 0:21:25.480
<v Speaker 1>with regard to crimea. Kevin SURREALI one topic that did

0:21:25.560 --> 0:21:29.159
<v Speaker 1>not get mentioned, but that could be described as a

0:21:29.320 --> 0:21:34.160
<v Speaker 1>sort of in the center of Syria and Crimea as

0:21:34.280 --> 0:21:36.880
<v Speaker 1>well as what is going on inside the European Union

0:21:36.920 --> 0:21:40.360
<v Speaker 1>and NATO, and that is Turkey. And uh, I'm wondering

0:21:40.520 --> 0:21:43.680
<v Speaker 1>if there's any thought that you've or any based on

0:21:43.760 --> 0:21:47.159
<v Speaker 1>your conversations, whether anyone has been talking about what is

0:21:47.200 --> 0:21:51.000
<v Speaker 1>happening in Turkey. You have Turkish government bond yields tenure

0:21:51.080 --> 0:21:55.840
<v Speaker 1>yields near seventeen percent, you have the Turkish leer trading

0:21:55.880 --> 0:21:58.479
<v Speaker 1>at a record low against the US dollar, and at

0:21:58.520 --> 0:22:02.400
<v Speaker 1>the same time Turkeys looking to by Russian missile systems

0:22:02.520 --> 0:22:07.160
<v Speaker 1>and US mad F thirty five joint strike fighters. Yes,

0:22:07.320 --> 0:22:09.640
<v Speaker 1>and I think that that is from a broader context.

0:22:09.880 --> 0:22:13.719
<v Speaker 1>You correct, there has been no direct connection of Turkey

0:22:14.000 --> 0:22:17.520
<v Speaker 1>in the last week or comments from Turkey Bostly administration

0:22:17.600 --> 0:22:21.520
<v Speaker 1>publicly forecasting remarks regarding Ukraine and Crimea, but with regards

0:22:21.560 --> 0:22:24.720
<v Speaker 1>to the Turkey in particular, I think this is where

0:22:24.720 --> 0:22:28.960
<v Speaker 1>the NATO negotiations really become interesting, particularly but the President

0:22:29.040 --> 0:22:33.320
<v Speaker 1>asserting that he has been able to ulster NATO funding that,

0:22:33.520 --> 0:22:36.680
<v Speaker 1>according to Prime Minister May, is something that gets the

0:22:36.720 --> 0:22:39.600
<v Speaker 1>president an upper hand in the Putin Trump meeting or

0:22:39.640 --> 0:22:42.800
<v Speaker 1>summit call, which one uh in hell stinky, I would

0:22:42.880 --> 0:22:45.600
<v Speaker 1>quickly note. And Tom when we talked about this every

0:22:45.680 --> 0:22:47.879
<v Speaker 1>morning about how you know, we make light of it.

0:22:48.000 --> 0:22:50.760
<v Speaker 1>But but just from the from the moment that we're in,

0:22:51.440 --> 0:22:54.520
<v Speaker 1>if you look at the names and how President Trump

0:22:54.640 --> 0:22:58.159
<v Speaker 1>is presenting himself, Rupert Murdoch owned the sun. Uh, this

0:22:58.400 --> 0:23:01.720
<v Speaker 1>was this is President trump embrace thing, the triangulation of

0:23:01.800 --> 0:23:06.600
<v Speaker 1>presenting himself European stage of Nile Farage, Deep Bannon, a

0:23:06.720 --> 0:23:11.600
<v Speaker 1>senior economic adviser, Peter Navarrow, Kevin Curlie, please stay with us.

0:23:11.600 --> 0:23:15.840
<v Speaker 1>We're now seeing the cars at checkers on a very

0:23:16.200 --> 0:23:20.160
<v Speaker 1>brown grass field. The heat here, folks has been really stunning.

0:23:20.680 --> 0:23:23.639
<v Speaker 1>All of the parks of London are brown brown brown,

0:23:24.200 --> 0:23:27.240
<v Speaker 1>uh and dry dry dry, And the helicopter waiting to

0:23:27.280 --> 0:23:31.000
<v Speaker 1>take the president of course t scheduled at Windsor today,

0:23:31.920 --> 0:23:36.680
<v Speaker 1>Kevin with within the dance here is immigration and that

0:23:36.880 --> 0:23:42.120
<v Speaker 1>is something that clearly ties every modern nation together. Review

0:23:42.280 --> 0:23:46.720
<v Speaker 1>for our global audience and our American audience, how the

0:23:46.880 --> 0:23:50.359
<v Speaker 1>president is doing in the polls. I have told many

0:23:50.520 --> 0:23:54.960
<v Speaker 1>people this week in London that when the President mentions

0:23:55.280 --> 0:24:00.200
<v Speaker 1>his beliefs on immigration. It's not a small, small, any

0:24:00.320 --> 0:24:04.760
<v Speaker 1>minority interest. How is he doing in the polls? The

0:24:04.800 --> 0:24:07.119
<v Speaker 1>base of the Republican Party is very much with him.

0:24:07.160 --> 0:24:11.919
<v Speaker 1>He remains incredibly popular amongst Republicans. Congress remains incredibly unpopular.

0:24:12.600 --> 0:24:14.879
<v Speaker 1>Uh and and I would note for the global audience,

0:24:14.960 --> 0:24:17.800
<v Speaker 1>there was a fascinating scene earlier this week for President

0:24:17.880 --> 0:24:21.920
<v Speaker 1>Trump really taking head on German Chancellor Angela Merkel. That

0:24:22.000 --> 0:24:26.920
<v Speaker 1>plays incredibly well the independent voters, particularly when he's arguing

0:24:27.600 --> 0:24:30.920
<v Speaker 1>that other countries ought to be putting the bill in NATO.

0:24:31.040 --> 0:24:35.440
<v Speaker 1>Now there is rightful criticism of the president mathematical assertion

0:24:36.080 --> 0:24:38.960
<v Speaker 1>of that, uh and and and people can have that

0:24:39.040 --> 0:24:42.280
<v Speaker 1>policy debate, but from a pure political standpoint, not a

0:24:42.359 --> 0:24:45.520
<v Speaker 1>policy standpoint. That moment where the President is speaking on

0:24:45.600 --> 0:24:49.639
<v Speaker 1>behalf of American taxpayers is that plays well according to

0:24:49.680 --> 0:24:51.960
<v Speaker 1>the political advisors that I speak with here in Washington,

0:24:52.040 --> 0:24:54.760
<v Speaker 1>on both sides of the Aisle. UH. Independent voters in

0:24:54.840 --> 0:24:59.400
<v Speaker 1>states like Wish, Michigan, with consinent Pennsylvania Kevin Sirley, thank

0:24:59.440 --> 0:25:02.040
<v Speaker 1>you so much. Really look forward to seeing you UH

0:25:02.160 --> 0:25:05.919
<v Speaker 1>in Helsinki here in the next twelve to UH twenty

0:25:05.960 --> 0:25:10.120
<v Speaker 1>four hours, Kevin as surly as our chief Washington corresponded,

0:25:16.119 --> 0:25:20.200
<v Speaker 1>Thanks for listening to the Bloomberg Surveillance podcast. Subscribe and

0:25:20.359 --> 0:25:25.639
<v Speaker 1>listen to interviews on Apple Podcasts, SoundCloud, or whichever podcast

0:25:25.720 --> 0:25:29.960
<v Speaker 1>platform you prefer. I'm on Twitter at Tom Keane before

0:25:30.000 --> 0:25:33.840
<v Speaker 1>the podcast. You can always catch us worldwide. I'm Bloomberg

0:25:33.920 --> 0:25:34.200
<v Speaker 1>Radio