WEBVTT - Using AI to Explain Stock Moves

0:00:13.920 --> 0:00:17.360
<v Speaker 1>Welcome to Wako's Up, a weekly markets podcast. Humble Dona

0:00:17.440 --> 0:00:19.720
<v Speaker 1>Hire a market supporter with Bloomberg.

0:00:19.360 --> 0:00:21.799
<v Speaker 2>And I'm Katie Greifeld. Mike Reagan is off this week.

0:00:21.920 --> 0:00:23.079
<v Speaker 1>I'm so happy to have you here.

0:00:23.160 --> 0:00:23.960
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, thank god.

0:00:24.079 --> 0:00:26.479
<v Speaker 1>But first, Katie, it's been a really long time since

0:00:26.480 --> 0:00:29.920
<v Speaker 1>you've been on the podcast. I want to loll youoateral years,

0:00:29.960 --> 0:00:32.280
<v Speaker 1>not literal, No, it actually no literal.

0:00:32.400 --> 0:00:34.360
<v Speaker 2>But I'm thrilled to be here because it feels like

0:00:34.400 --> 0:00:35.440
<v Speaker 2>there's a lot to talk about.

0:00:35.720 --> 0:00:37.600
<v Speaker 1>There is, but I'm gonna put you on the spot first.

0:00:37.680 --> 0:00:38.040
<v Speaker 2>Okay.

0:00:38.479 --> 0:00:40.519
<v Speaker 1>I want you to tell the audience something about you

0:00:40.720 --> 0:00:44.360
<v Speaker 1>that nobody knows, not even your husband.

0:00:44.560 --> 0:00:48.199
<v Speaker 2>Oh no, I mean I don't think there's anything I

0:00:48.200 --> 0:00:51.720
<v Speaker 2>would say. I am extremely afraid of the dark.

0:00:52.520 --> 0:00:53.040
<v Speaker 3>I knew that.

0:00:53.400 --> 0:00:55.040
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, we are in a bit of a dark home.

0:00:55.080 --> 0:00:56.080
<v Speaker 1>It has black walls.

0:00:56.200 --> 0:00:59.120
<v Speaker 2>No, it's just like when you're in maybe a room

0:00:59.400 --> 0:01:02.040
<v Speaker 2>or your house saloon and the lights go out. I

0:01:02.160 --> 0:01:02.840
<v Speaker 2>hate that.

0:01:02.840 --> 0:01:03.960
<v Speaker 1>That's not a secret.

0:01:04.240 --> 0:01:06.959
<v Speaker 2>I'm media trained enough, don't you don't do.

0:01:06.959 --> 0:01:07.880
<v Speaker 1>That secret.

0:01:09.240 --> 0:01:09.640
<v Speaker 2>Anyway.

0:01:09.800 --> 0:01:12.959
<v Speaker 1>Artificial intelligence is all the hype on Wall Street these days,

0:01:13.040 --> 0:01:16.000
<v Speaker 1>and we have some strategists even seeing AI trends driving

0:01:16.000 --> 0:01:19.160
<v Speaker 1>further gains for stocks. Now one company is looking to

0:01:19.200 --> 0:01:24.080
<v Speaker 1>analyze US equity market trends using AI technology to project

0:01:24.080 --> 0:01:27.200
<v Speaker 1>in real time why stocks might be moving, and its

0:01:27.200 --> 0:01:31.240
<v Speaker 1>founder is joining us today. Gets Yen's Nordvic. He's the

0:01:31.280 --> 0:01:34.800
<v Speaker 1>co founder and CEO of Market Reader, and he's also

0:01:34.920 --> 0:01:38.279
<v Speaker 1>the founder and CEO of ex Anti Data. So, YenS,

0:01:38.360 --> 0:01:41.440
<v Speaker 1>thank you so much for joining us. I told so

0:01:41.520 --> 0:01:43.120
<v Speaker 1>many people you were going to be on the podcast,

0:01:43.160 --> 0:01:44.720
<v Speaker 1>and everybody's like, oh my god, I know him.

0:01:45.080 --> 0:01:46.640
<v Speaker 4>It was crazy that there was a line of people

0:01:46.640 --> 0:01:48.360
<v Speaker 4>when I came into the building. What's going on here?

0:01:48.520 --> 0:01:50.720
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, there was literally a lot of people. They were like,

0:01:50.720 --> 0:01:52.720
<v Speaker 1>I would like to meet him, and so that's why

0:01:52.720 --> 0:01:53.160
<v Speaker 1>we were like.

0:01:53.160 --> 0:01:55.240
<v Speaker 2>I was thrilled that Mike Reagan happened to be off

0:01:55.240 --> 0:01:58.160
<v Speaker 2>this week because I haven't talked to you in years.

0:01:58.200 --> 0:01:59.160
<v Speaker 2>But we go back.

0:01:59.440 --> 0:02:03.960
<v Speaker 4>I have been doing surveillance in the morning, probably forty times,

0:02:04.400 --> 0:02:07.720
<v Speaker 4>but I've not been in the office. This office I've

0:02:07.760 --> 0:02:10.919
<v Speaker 4>not been to I think since nineteen So it was weird,

0:02:11.000 --> 0:02:12.560
<v Speaker 4>but it's still the same building at least.

0:02:12.680 --> 0:02:14.920
<v Speaker 1>Oh yeah, it feels like Mike Reagan also hasn't been

0:02:14.960 --> 0:02:20.200
<v Speaker 1>in this office. Okay, so again, just to start, Katie

0:02:20.280 --> 0:02:22.560
<v Speaker 1>knows you. All these people I talk to know you,

0:02:22.639 --> 0:02:25.480
<v Speaker 1>but maybe just tell our audience a little bit about you.

0:02:25.800 --> 0:02:29.400
<v Speaker 4>I started my career being a currency strategist to Goldman

0:02:29.680 --> 0:02:32.600
<v Speaker 4>and then I was a currency strategist at Bridgeward Associates.

0:02:32.639 --> 0:02:34.079
<v Speaker 3>I was head of research.

0:02:33.680 --> 0:02:36.320
<v Speaker 4>At the More Securities, and then in sixteen I founded

0:02:36.320 --> 0:02:41.000
<v Speaker 4>a company called Exante Data where we advise institutional investors

0:02:41.120 --> 0:02:44.000
<v Speaker 4>on what's going on in the world using a lot

0:02:44.000 --> 0:02:48.359
<v Speaker 4>of data. And that's the sort of background. But really

0:02:48.200 --> 0:02:50.040
<v Speaker 4>the reason why I invite me in today is that

0:02:50.080 --> 0:02:53.160
<v Speaker 4>we have a new company called market Reader, where we

0:02:53.639 --> 0:02:57.760
<v Speaker 4>use latest technology to really crunch data in real time

0:02:58.360 --> 0:03:00.480
<v Speaker 4>and explain why the market is moving. So if you

0:03:00.520 --> 0:03:02.560
<v Speaker 4>have a stock that's gapping down, market readers should be

0:03:02.600 --> 0:03:05.840
<v Speaker 4>able to tell you why using all the different techniques

0:03:05.880 --> 0:03:08.240
<v Speaker 4>that like a top hedge fund would also be using,

0:03:08.240 --> 0:03:11.280
<v Speaker 4>but all programmed and a piece of software something that

0:03:11.360 --> 0:03:12.880
<v Speaker 4>everybody reader should be able to use.

0:03:13.000 --> 0:03:14.520
<v Speaker 1>And are you also afraid of the dark?

0:03:15.639 --> 0:03:15.679
<v Speaker 2>Not?

0:03:16.720 --> 0:03:19.640
<v Speaker 4>Not really, but this room is a little bit scary.

0:03:19.639 --> 0:03:21.240
<v Speaker 4>It is one of the blackest rooms I've seen.

0:03:21.639 --> 0:03:24.160
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, it's pretty cool. I don't know, it's just you know,

0:03:24.200 --> 0:03:27.040
<v Speaker 2>when the lights go out, you don't know where everything is. Yeah,

0:03:27.080 --> 0:03:30.040
<v Speaker 2>I like to know in any case, So market reader,

0:03:30.160 --> 0:03:33.400
<v Speaker 2>so you say that this is theoretically similar to what

0:03:33.880 --> 0:03:36.920
<v Speaker 2>a hedge fund would be doing. Who is your client then?

0:03:37.000 --> 0:03:37.880
<v Speaker 2>Is it hedge funds?

0:03:38.280 --> 0:03:41.120
<v Speaker 4>This is my biggest problem with the market reader that

0:03:41.240 --> 0:03:44.000
<v Speaker 4>I think it's literally for everybody, So everybody else wants to, Oh,

0:03:44.000 --> 0:03:45.320
<v Speaker 4>who's your target audience?

0:03:45.320 --> 0:03:45.840
<v Speaker 3>Who is it?

0:03:46.600 --> 0:03:48.880
<v Speaker 4>I think it could be used by a hedge fund

0:03:48.880 --> 0:03:51.600
<v Speaker 4>manager or an asset manager, but it could also be used

0:03:51.640 --> 0:03:54.800
<v Speaker 4>by somebody who has, you know, a savings account and

0:03:54.840 --> 0:03:57.680
<v Speaker 4>investing on their own and they've maybe lost some money

0:03:57.680 --> 0:03:59.640
<v Speaker 4>and made some money. They want to know why so

0:03:59.680 --> 0:04:04.119
<v Speaker 4>they can good decisions. So this could be used by everybody,

0:04:04.120 --> 0:04:07.040
<v Speaker 4>Like I have a company where we cater to like

0:04:07.120 --> 0:04:10.960
<v Speaker 4>a niche audience of institutional investors. Right, the whole goal

0:04:11.080 --> 0:04:14.400
<v Speaker 4>of market reader is to do something for millions of users.

0:04:14.160 --> 0:04:17.000
<v Speaker 3>Really like have a tool that everybody can use.

0:04:17.000 --> 0:04:20.120
<v Speaker 4>And I have to say the AI aspect actually has

0:04:20.200 --> 0:04:23.200
<v Speaker 4>turned out to be very important in that regard, right,

0:04:23.200 --> 0:04:28.400
<v Speaker 4>because we have complex models that generate the results, but

0:04:28.480 --> 0:04:32.000
<v Speaker 4>the AI, the language processing, really allows us to present

0:04:32.200 --> 0:04:35.320
<v Speaker 4>that in a very easy to understand way, right, a

0:04:35.400 --> 0:04:37.240
<v Speaker 4>couple of lines of text saying Okay, this is really

0:04:37.279 --> 0:04:40.080
<v Speaker 4>what you need to know about this stock or this ETF.

0:04:40.360 --> 0:04:42.320
<v Speaker 4>And if it's just like you know, model output, it

0:04:42.320 --> 0:04:45.440
<v Speaker 4>would actually be kind of hard to digest. So the

0:04:45.480 --> 0:04:48.520
<v Speaker 4>AI technology has really allowed us to present stuff in

0:04:48.560 --> 0:04:49.880
<v Speaker 4>an easier to digest way.

0:04:50.120 --> 0:04:53.080
<v Speaker 1>Okay, so talk more about the AI aspect, because that

0:04:53.120 --> 0:04:55.440
<v Speaker 1>part obviously is super interesting to a lot of people

0:04:55.480 --> 0:04:58.960
<v Speaker 1>these days. But how even does market reader work? And

0:04:59.000 --> 0:05:03.279
<v Speaker 1>I know you won't spill the secret sauce I suppose

0:05:03.320 --> 0:05:05.400
<v Speaker 1>I could call it, but just like, give us an

0:05:05.400 --> 0:05:07.680
<v Speaker 1>overview of how it works, what it does, and how

0:05:07.720 --> 0:05:08.599
<v Speaker 1>the AI plays it.

0:05:08.880 --> 0:05:11.720
<v Speaker 4>I will give an example. Right, So, one of the

0:05:11.760 --> 0:05:14.920
<v Speaker 4>inputs into our system is literally everything that's going on

0:05:14.920 --> 0:05:17.680
<v Speaker 4>on social media. We so ingest a lot of data, right,

0:05:18.120 --> 0:05:20.400
<v Speaker 4>but if you look at everything that's going on on Twitter,

0:05:20.440 --> 0:05:23.080
<v Speaker 4>for example, there's a lot of stuff that is not

0:05:23.120 --> 0:05:25.599
<v Speaker 4>that relevant, a lot of stuff that is fairly noisy.

0:05:25.680 --> 0:05:25.840
<v Speaker 3>Right.

0:05:25.920 --> 0:05:28.080
<v Speaker 4>So one of the ways we can apply AI is

0:05:28.080 --> 0:05:31.120
<v Speaker 4>to literally say, is this a high quality tweet that

0:05:31.160 --> 0:05:33.760
<v Speaker 4>we should consider? Is this a low quality maybe even

0:05:33.760 --> 0:05:41.600
<v Speaker 4>inappropriate tweet right, and that process is extremely powerful, extremely powerful.

0:05:41.800 --> 0:05:44.640
<v Speaker 4>So there's sort of analytical aspect, but there's also as

0:05:44.640 --> 0:05:47.200
<v Speaker 4>a set before in presentational aspect when you then have

0:05:47.360 --> 0:05:50.080
<v Speaker 4>all the results from all the different fundamental models, just

0:05:50.160 --> 0:05:54.640
<v Speaker 4>summarizing in a way where the human can actually understand.

0:05:54.080 --> 0:05:55.239
<v Speaker 3>It very quickly.

0:05:55.560 --> 0:05:57.960
<v Speaker 4>It's very hard to get like how should we call

0:05:58.040 --> 0:06:01.560
<v Speaker 4>it mechanical robot to do it? But the possibilities you

0:06:01.640 --> 0:06:05.159
<v Speaker 4>have within different AI tools such as chet GPT to

0:06:05.279 --> 0:06:08.200
<v Speaker 4>really generate text that is what should we call it,

0:06:08.240 --> 0:06:13.280
<v Speaker 4>like digestible but also appetizing is something new and give

0:06:13.360 --> 0:06:14.360
<v Speaker 4>some new opportunities.

0:06:14.520 --> 0:06:16.480
<v Speaker 2>And that's what I wanted to sort of hone in

0:06:16.880 --> 0:06:19.680
<v Speaker 2>on on the new part, because you know, describing you know,

0:06:19.720 --> 0:06:23.880
<v Speaker 2>scraping social media that necessarily isn't new, but it sounds

0:06:23.880 --> 0:06:27.040
<v Speaker 2>like it's the step further turning that into text that

0:06:27.640 --> 0:06:29.520
<v Speaker 2>kind of makes sense and you can read and is

0:06:30.000 --> 0:06:32.720
<v Speaker 2>pleasant to look at. Am I understanding that correctly.

0:06:32.760 --> 0:06:35.320
<v Speaker 4>There's many ways we use AI, but two good examples

0:06:35.360 --> 0:06:38.600
<v Speaker 4>would be the filtering itself, Like we can actually use

0:06:38.640 --> 0:06:41.320
<v Speaker 4>the language models to say, okay, is this the type

0:06:41.360 --> 0:06:43.320
<v Speaker 4>of content we want to look at it all? So

0:06:43.360 --> 0:06:45.960
<v Speaker 4>it can kind of look as a filtering mechanism, right.

0:06:46.279 --> 0:06:48.839
<v Speaker 4>And then there's a further step that is close to

0:06:48.880 --> 0:06:51.239
<v Speaker 4>where the user gets the output, where we essentially, okay,

0:06:51.600 --> 0:06:54.280
<v Speaker 4>present all this model output in a way where it's

0:06:54.320 --> 0:06:56.880
<v Speaker 4>easy to digest in one second. Right, there's those two

0:06:56.960 --> 0:06:57.680
<v Speaker 4>aspects of it.

0:06:57.839 --> 0:06:58.080
<v Speaker 3>Okay.

0:06:58.080 --> 0:07:01.359
<v Speaker 1>And then let's say I ran an analysis on some

0:07:01.839 --> 0:07:06.520
<v Speaker 1>stock and then I got the little paragraph, Right, what

0:07:06.600 --> 0:07:08.960
<v Speaker 1>do I then do with that information? What does the

0:07:08.960 --> 0:07:09.880
<v Speaker 1>typical client do?

0:07:10.520 --> 0:07:13.680
<v Speaker 4>It could be used by financial advisor, right, Like if

0:07:13.680 --> 0:07:16.960
<v Speaker 4>financial advisor has fifty stocks that his clients are following,

0:07:17.000 --> 0:07:19.680
<v Speaker 4>you can very quickly get a gist of Okay, that

0:07:19.680 --> 0:07:21.800
<v Speaker 4>client just lost five percent, and now I know why.

0:07:21.840 --> 0:07:23.760
<v Speaker 4>I can tell him if he calls, right, so it

0:07:23.760 --> 0:07:26.320
<v Speaker 4>can be used for that. Actually was last week nowadays

0:07:26.320 --> 0:07:29.400
<v Speaker 4>of passing fast, we had Madona was popping again. Like

0:07:29.440 --> 0:07:32.320
<v Speaker 4>in the old days vaccine stocks, and I used to

0:07:32.360 --> 0:07:34.200
<v Speaker 4>do a lot of COVID forecasting, but it's not a

0:07:34.200 --> 0:07:35.560
<v Speaker 4>big part of our process anymore.

0:07:35.680 --> 0:07:36.600
<v Speaker 3>It does move marketing.

0:07:36.840 --> 0:07:39.640
<v Speaker 4>Would Madanna moved ten percent very quickly, and it popped

0:07:39.680 --> 0:07:42.320
<v Speaker 4>up in our system, right, And the reason was there

0:07:42.400 --> 0:07:45.400
<v Speaker 4>was actually a new wave of COVID in China that

0:07:45.440 --> 0:07:48.160
<v Speaker 4>I had not known like, so even though I've been

0:07:48.160 --> 0:07:51.280
<v Speaker 4>doing this for three years now, it actually showed me

0:07:51.360 --> 0:07:53.120
<v Speaker 4>something where I said, Okay, go and look at that,

0:07:53.160 --> 0:07:55.120
<v Speaker 4>and then we want to analyze the COVID data as well.

0:07:55.200 --> 0:07:55.800
<v Speaker 3>There was a spike.

0:07:55.840 --> 0:07:58.040
<v Speaker 4>We didn't think it was enough to worry about, but

0:07:58.120 --> 0:08:00.560
<v Speaker 4>it can actually allert you to stuff happen that you're

0:08:00.560 --> 0:08:01.600
<v Speaker 4>otherwise not aware of.

0:08:02.560 --> 0:08:06.000
<v Speaker 1>Audience can't see us. But I went whow because I

0:08:06.040 --> 0:08:07.480
<v Speaker 1>hadn't heard that COVID news either.

0:08:07.680 --> 0:08:07.880
<v Speaker 3>Yeah.

0:08:08.000 --> 0:08:11.240
<v Speaker 4>No, and I like, we're known for literally like tracking

0:08:11.280 --> 0:08:14.160
<v Speaker 4>COVID like that. We have clients that came to us

0:08:14.640 --> 0:08:17.960
<v Speaker 4>in the COVID crisis, So it was kind of interesting

0:08:18.000 --> 0:08:20.320
<v Speaker 4>to see that example. Like obviously the Silicon Valley bank

0:08:22.040 --> 0:08:24.800
<v Speaker 4>situation that everybody knows about is another one where the

0:08:24.840 --> 0:08:28.360
<v Speaker 4>system was very helpful. Say okay on that Wednesday night, Okay,

0:08:28.600 --> 0:08:31.920
<v Speaker 4>there's something happening here. It's because of the announcement they

0:08:32.160 --> 0:08:34.640
<v Speaker 4>made about the bond says. By the way, First Republic

0:08:34.720 --> 0:08:36.560
<v Speaker 4>is also doing something it's not supposed to do on

0:08:36.559 --> 0:08:39.719
<v Speaker 4>Wednesday night. And those are instruments. I'm not used to

0:08:39.760 --> 0:08:43.320
<v Speaker 4>having those instruments on my screen. I'm traditionally currency guy. Right,

0:08:43.320 --> 0:08:45.760
<v Speaker 4>if there's something happening with the Euro, I'll have it

0:08:45.800 --> 0:08:48.560
<v Speaker 4>on my screen. But all those smallest stocks I don't have.

0:08:48.679 --> 0:08:48.880
<v Speaker 3>Right.

0:08:49.200 --> 0:08:52.120
<v Speaker 4>So having a system that can monitor everything that's going

0:08:52.120 --> 0:08:55.080
<v Speaker 4>on in the US equity market eleven thousand instruments and

0:08:55.200 --> 0:08:58.280
<v Speaker 4>pick out what should you focus on now gives you.

0:08:58.240 --> 0:09:00.440
<v Speaker 3>A really anability to absorb more information.

0:09:01.200 --> 0:09:03.960
<v Speaker 2>And so it's the US equity market, right, that's the

0:09:04.000 --> 0:09:05.200
<v Speaker 2>only asset class right now.

0:09:05.240 --> 0:09:07.160
<v Speaker 4>We want to do everything. So at the moment in

0:09:07.200 --> 0:09:10.839
<v Speaker 4>the system, we have US stocks ad rs like foreign

0:09:10.840 --> 0:09:14.800
<v Speaker 4>companies that are listed here ETFs that will cover the macroangle, right,

0:09:14.880 --> 0:09:17.559
<v Speaker 4>but we want to do literally every single financial instruments.

0:09:17.600 --> 0:09:19.280
<v Speaker 3>So give us a few weeks, few months, we will

0:09:19.320 --> 0:09:19.720
<v Speaker 3>have that done.

0:09:19.920 --> 0:09:22.040
<v Speaker 2>You have a few weeks, a few weeks, we'll give

0:09:22.080 --> 0:09:24.199
<v Speaker 2>you two weeks, yeah, two weeks, and then we'll check

0:09:24.240 --> 0:09:28.319
<v Speaker 2>back in. So it creates this text that you can

0:09:28.360 --> 0:09:33.160
<v Speaker 2>actually read. It doesn't necessarily issue like a buy sell recommendation.

0:09:33.679 --> 0:09:37.120
<v Speaker 4>No, So we call it market reader very intentionally, like

0:09:37.160 --> 0:09:42.040
<v Speaker 4>we want it to really generate information that describes what's

0:09:42.080 --> 0:09:45.199
<v Speaker 4>going on. I'm sure there's going to be quant funds

0:09:45.240 --> 0:09:47.200
<v Speaker 4>and so forth. That can use the data set that

0:09:47.240 --> 0:09:50.480
<v Speaker 4>we're generating to create their own signals and outph and

0:09:50.480 --> 0:09:52.520
<v Speaker 4>so forth. But we want this to be for a

0:09:52.520 --> 0:09:55.080
<v Speaker 4>lot of people, and the purpose of our company is

0:09:55.080 --> 0:09:58.520
<v Speaker 4>to explain in a very objective, very precise way what's

0:09:58.520 --> 0:09:58.840
<v Speaker 4>going on.

0:09:58.960 --> 0:10:09.079
<v Speaker 1>Right, Okay, So is it fortuitous or maybe lucky is

0:10:09.120 --> 0:10:11.600
<v Speaker 1>the right word that you're that you started using AI

0:10:11.720 --> 0:10:13.760
<v Speaker 1>to do this and now AI is the big thing?

0:10:14.000 --> 0:10:16.679
<v Speaker 1>Or was it the case that even a couple of

0:10:16.720 --> 0:10:19.120
<v Speaker 1>years ago you thought to yourself, AI is going to

0:10:19.120 --> 0:10:21.559
<v Speaker 1>be the next big thing, so I'm going to incorporate

0:10:21.600 --> 0:10:22.640
<v Speaker 1>it into my strategy.

0:10:22.760 --> 0:10:25.800
<v Speaker 4>I think what's happened this year is that actually applying

0:10:25.920 --> 0:10:29.760
<v Speaker 4>AI has become so much easier than it was six

0:10:29.840 --> 0:10:32.280
<v Speaker 4>months ago or twelve months ago, Right, So the hurdle

0:10:32.360 --> 0:10:35.760
<v Speaker 4>to really embedding it in a system has been lowered

0:10:35.760 --> 0:10:39.719
<v Speaker 4>so much so. Our original plan was more focused on

0:10:39.760 --> 0:10:43.880
<v Speaker 4>structural modeling, traditional fundamental modeling, but we've really seen how

0:10:43.920 --> 0:10:46.240
<v Speaker 4>this actually allows us to do stuff that we just

0:10:46.280 --> 0:10:47.720
<v Speaker 4>can't do with traditional models.

0:10:47.760 --> 0:10:51.160
<v Speaker 3>So it's very it's.

0:10:50.720 --> 0:10:52.800
<v Speaker 4>Very rewarding to actually see that you can take the

0:10:52.840 --> 0:10:53.959
<v Speaker 4>technology step further.

0:10:54.760 --> 0:10:56.920
<v Speaker 2>I haven't really curious. I mean, my question at the

0:10:57.320 --> 0:11:00.559
<v Speaker 2>outset was who is this for? I'm curious about how

0:11:00.559 --> 0:11:03.360
<v Speaker 2>you market something like this because obviously, with AI being

0:11:03.360 --> 0:11:05.960
<v Speaker 2>the hot topic, there's going to be a lot of

0:11:06.040 --> 0:11:08.360
<v Speaker 2>snake oil out there, and obviously you have a track

0:11:08.400 --> 0:11:13.080
<v Speaker 2>record well respected. But when you're you're pitching this, I mean,

0:11:13.280 --> 0:11:16.480
<v Speaker 2>what does that pitch sound like? Especially when I'm sure

0:11:16.800 --> 0:11:19.280
<v Speaker 2>there's a lot of pitches out there right now.

0:11:19.520 --> 0:11:22.160
<v Speaker 4>If I'm gonna describe it very simply, is that we

0:11:22.400 --> 0:11:28.199
<v Speaker 4>don't have any garbage. Like when you look at financial markets,

0:11:28.240 --> 0:11:31.400
<v Speaker 4>they are so complex, like trying to figure out how

0:11:31.480 --> 0:11:36.160
<v Speaker 4>they linked, how processed correlations work, like one thing moves

0:11:36.160 --> 0:11:39.000
<v Speaker 4>the other and so forth, it's very easy to get

0:11:39.000 --> 0:11:43.439
<v Speaker 4>information overload and get like false positives effectively. Right, So

0:11:43.760 --> 0:11:46.520
<v Speaker 4>I think what our system is very good at is

0:11:46.559 --> 0:11:48.960
<v Speaker 4>to really cut down to what really matters and have

0:11:49.040 --> 0:11:51.120
<v Speaker 4>almost no noise, no garbage.

0:11:50.679 --> 0:11:51.160
<v Speaker 3>In the feed.

0:11:51.640 --> 0:11:53.839
<v Speaker 4>And I think that's what we've seen, Like once in

0:11:53.920 --> 0:11:55.959
<v Speaker 4>a while there's an AI tool that pops up with

0:11:56.000 --> 0:11:59.160
<v Speaker 4>the headlines, oh that sounds like market reader, and then

0:11:59.200 --> 0:12:02.640
<v Speaker 4>we see what is surfaced. Right, if you're just letting

0:12:02.840 --> 0:12:08.720
<v Speaker 4>the AI technology lose without you know, strict control of it,

0:12:08.720 --> 0:12:10.839
<v Speaker 4>it's going to find a lot of garbage and it's

0:12:10.880 --> 0:12:13.320
<v Speaker 4>going to become from it. For a financial market participant,

0:12:13.320 --> 0:12:16.839
<v Speaker 4>it's going to become not just useless, but like a

0:12:17.040 --> 0:12:19.400
<v Speaker 4>total waste of time, right, because it gives you information

0:12:19.440 --> 0:12:22.400
<v Speaker 4>that you don't want. So getting rid of the garbage

0:12:22.440 --> 0:12:26.040
<v Speaker 4>is very important. Also, if you think about if you

0:12:26.080 --> 0:12:28.120
<v Speaker 4>want to have alerts coming out from this thing, like

0:12:28.160 --> 0:12:30.000
<v Speaker 4>you don't want to get woken up at night because

0:12:30.000 --> 0:12:32.360
<v Speaker 4>there's something happened that is totally relevant.

0:12:31.920 --> 0:12:35.120
<v Speaker 3>For your portfolios. So getting rid of the garbage is cool.

0:12:35.160 --> 0:12:37.439
<v Speaker 4>So if you feel, if you feel that you can

0:12:37.520 --> 0:12:41.360
<v Speaker 4>feed chat, GPT or whatever AI technology with something that

0:12:41.480 --> 0:12:43.600
<v Speaker 4>is gold, right, then you're also going to get something

0:12:43.600 --> 0:12:44.679
<v Speaker 4>that's very valuable out.

0:12:45.559 --> 0:12:48.199
<v Speaker 1>So we had this great headline at Bloomberg this week

0:12:48.240 --> 0:12:50.760
<v Speaker 1>that said hedge funds are deploying chat gipt to handle

0:12:50.880 --> 0:12:53.400
<v Speaker 1>all the gruntwork. So I'm just curious how else you

0:12:53.520 --> 0:12:56.320
<v Speaker 1>see AI being deployed on Wall Street? Like, how are

0:12:56.360 --> 0:12:57.320
<v Speaker 1>companies using it?

0:12:57.400 --> 0:12:59.160
<v Speaker 4>I think a lot of hedge funds, a lot of

0:12:59.200 --> 0:13:02.199
<v Speaker 4>asset managers, and I've spoken too many about this over

0:13:02.200 --> 0:13:04.520
<v Speaker 4>the last couple of weeks, right, they all thinking about

0:13:04.520 --> 0:13:06.120
<v Speaker 4>how to go about doing this.

0:13:06.920 --> 0:13:07.560
<v Speaker 3>I think we're.

0:13:07.440 --> 0:13:11.040
<v Speaker 4>Still pretty early. We're still pretty early they're thinking about it.

0:13:11.120 --> 0:13:13.120
<v Speaker 4>I don't think this is something that has cost job

0:13:13.160 --> 0:13:15.920
<v Speaker 4>losses already. It's almost like in the short term is

0:13:15.960 --> 0:13:18.520
<v Speaker 4>almost the opposite, right, There has to be some investments

0:13:18.559 --> 0:13:22.600
<v Speaker 4>made in this field to harvest the benefit. But it's

0:13:22.640 --> 0:13:25.400
<v Speaker 4>gonna take a little while before we have matured to

0:13:25.440 --> 0:13:29.720
<v Speaker 4>a degree where it's actually gonna like substitute for some people.

0:13:29.760 --> 0:13:31.040
<v Speaker 2>I think, I like, how you.

0:13:31.000 --> 0:13:35.120
<v Speaker 1>Thought garbage was a bad word. Yeah, right, we say

0:13:35.160 --> 0:13:35.800
<v Speaker 1>garbage here?

0:13:36.120 --> 0:13:39.640
<v Speaker 2>Are you gonna name names some people here? So in

0:13:39.760 --> 0:13:42.319
<v Speaker 2>talking about AI in this conversation, I mean, it seems

0:13:42.320 --> 0:13:47.080
<v Speaker 2>like we're talking about language processing. We're talking about generative AI,

0:13:47.720 --> 0:13:53.400
<v Speaker 2>not necessarily like machine learning. Because I'm pretty new to AI,

0:13:53.679 --> 0:13:56.280
<v Speaker 2>obviously interested in it, covered a lot, talk about it

0:13:56.320 --> 0:13:59.400
<v Speaker 2>a lot, But when it comes to investing, it seems

0:13:59.400 --> 0:14:02.280
<v Speaker 2>like there's this dichotomy here that you know, there's sort

0:14:02.320 --> 0:14:05.720
<v Speaker 2>of the text based AI, and then there's like machine learning.

0:14:05.720 --> 0:14:07.720
<v Speaker 2>Maybe you run a model a bunch and bunch a

0:14:07.720 --> 0:14:09.439
<v Speaker 2>bunch of times and it gets a little bit better

0:14:09.760 --> 0:14:13.160
<v Speaker 2>each time. You're firmly situated. It seems like in the

0:14:13.240 --> 0:14:14.199
<v Speaker 2>text based AI.

0:14:15.120 --> 0:14:18.240
<v Speaker 4>In the end, we will have the world kind of

0:14:18.840 --> 0:14:23.680
<v Speaker 4>past in a new way, right because we're gonna have

0:14:23.920 --> 0:14:26.640
<v Speaker 4>costal explanations for everything, and we're going to have a

0:14:26.840 --> 0:14:30.320
<v Speaker 4>very high frequency data set that has those costal explanations

0:14:30.360 --> 0:14:31.040
<v Speaker 4>attached to it.

0:14:31.760 --> 0:14:31.960
<v Speaker 3>Right.

0:14:32.080 --> 0:14:36.200
<v Speaker 4>So with that proprietary data set, you can take the

0:14:36.240 --> 0:14:38.720
<v Speaker 4>next step and say, okay, let's do some machine learning

0:14:38.720 --> 0:14:40.920
<v Speaker 4>on that. Figure out Okay, where are the alpha streams?

0:14:41.000 --> 0:14:41.160
<v Speaker 3>Right?

0:14:41.240 --> 0:14:44.160
<v Speaker 4>So I'm not planning to do that internally. I don't

0:14:44.160 --> 0:14:46.720
<v Speaker 4>have an aspiration to become an asset manager. We want

0:14:46.720 --> 0:14:49.280
<v Speaker 4>to help other asset managers do that, but there will

0:14:49.280 --> 0:14:50.600
<v Speaker 4>be that element to it as well.

0:14:51.280 --> 0:14:53.800
<v Speaker 2>So it's also interesting talking to you because you know,

0:14:53.840 --> 0:14:58.520
<v Speaker 2>you ran through your resume you were in analystic goldmans

0:14:58.760 --> 0:15:01.760
<v Speaker 2>or analysts. I don't know if you get picky about you.

0:15:01.760 --> 0:15:04.200
<v Speaker 4>Know, some people call it economists, but some people don't

0:15:04.280 --> 0:15:07.280
<v Speaker 4>like that, so, uh, strategists, some people like better.

0:15:07.760 --> 0:15:08.960
<v Speaker 3>We can choose whatever you like.

0:15:09.040 --> 0:15:10.880
<v Speaker 2>So you were a strategist at Goldvin, you were a

0:15:10.920 --> 0:15:14.640
<v Speaker 2>strategist at Nomura. Are you basically trying to put past

0:15:14.760 --> 0:15:18.640
<v Speaker 2>versions of yourself out of business? Is what you're you're doing?

0:15:18.680 --> 0:15:21.880
<v Speaker 2>What market reader does does that sort of displace the

0:15:21.960 --> 0:15:25.920
<v Speaker 2>traditional research analyst.

0:15:25.680 --> 0:15:29.520
<v Speaker 4>Within Excante Data, we have a Bloomberg chat right where

0:15:29.560 --> 0:15:34.120
<v Speaker 4>we talk to top institutional investors around the world around.

0:15:34.160 --> 0:15:35.400
<v Speaker 1>You don't talk to us, though.

0:15:37.200 --> 0:15:39.680
<v Speaker 4>If you want to pay, maybe you can get involved

0:15:39.680 --> 0:15:42.000
<v Speaker 4>in the chat, But this is like people pay for

0:15:42.080 --> 0:15:45.560
<v Speaker 4>that service, right, and we have an intense discussion about stuff.

0:15:46.000 --> 0:15:49.400
<v Speaker 4>To answer your question, right, It's totally possible that some

0:15:49.480 --> 0:15:53.160
<v Speaker 4>of the content that is there could be done by

0:15:53.520 --> 0:15:56.480
<v Speaker 4>a robot version of one of my team members or

0:15:56.480 --> 0:16:01.280
<v Speaker 4>a robot version of myself, and we definitely think about that.

0:16:01.480 --> 0:16:04.080
<v Speaker 4>We can also think about using essentially the market reader

0:16:04.160 --> 0:16:06.440
<v Speaker 4>technology to do aspects of what we do for the

0:16:06.440 --> 0:16:09.240
<v Speaker 4>Exante Data clients. This is going to be fun stuff

0:16:09.560 --> 0:16:12.960
<v Speaker 4>and maybe we can do analysis that we otherwise wouldn't do.

0:16:13.720 --> 0:16:15.760
<v Speaker 4>Maybe there's some analysis we don't like to do that

0:16:15.800 --> 0:16:17.600
<v Speaker 4>we find boring, that we give to the role what

0:16:17.720 --> 0:16:19.080
<v Speaker 4>to do, and then we have more time to do

0:16:19.160 --> 0:16:19.880
<v Speaker 4>some fun stuff.

0:16:20.480 --> 0:16:22.680
<v Speaker 1>And we can't let you go because of this Wall

0:16:22.720 --> 0:16:25.560
<v Speaker 1>Street background of yours without you sharing some thoughts on

0:16:25.600 --> 0:16:28.640
<v Speaker 1>what you're actually seeing in terms of markets. I think

0:16:28.880 --> 0:16:32.760
<v Speaker 1>you're looking at global growth slowing down. What evidence are

0:16:32.760 --> 0:16:35.160
<v Speaker 1>you looking at and just what are your thoughts, probably

0:16:35.240 --> 0:16:40.280
<v Speaker 1>speaking on everything that's going on with global economies and markets.

0:16:40.600 --> 0:16:44.400
<v Speaker 4>Yeah, we crunch a lot of data. So for China,

0:16:44.960 --> 0:16:47.920
<v Speaker 4>we essentially have a rule that we try not to

0:16:48.120 --> 0:16:51.160
<v Speaker 4>look at official data because we think it is since

0:16:51.160 --> 0:16:54.840
<v Speaker 4>we're allowed to use the word garbage. So we use

0:16:54.880 --> 0:16:57.280
<v Speaker 4>our own alternative data to have a sense of what's

0:16:57.320 --> 0:17:00.800
<v Speaker 4>going on in the Chinese economy. And we've had pretty

0:17:00.800 --> 0:17:03.520
<v Speaker 4>weak signals since the end of March. Right now it's

0:17:03.520 --> 0:17:06.000
<v Speaker 4>showing up in the official data while least the PMIS

0:17:06.040 --> 0:17:09.399
<v Speaker 4>will a lag. So this is an important thing for

0:17:09.440 --> 0:17:13.600
<v Speaker 4>the global economy, right, because other economies when they've reopened,

0:17:14.119 --> 0:17:17.760
<v Speaker 4>it was a multi quarter process with a booming economy, right,

0:17:17.800 --> 0:17:19.600
<v Speaker 4>And in China's case, it looks like they had one

0:17:19.680 --> 0:17:22.840
<v Speaker 4>quarter of better growth and now they're slowing already, right,

0:17:22.880 --> 0:17:24.879
<v Speaker 4>So that's the negative surprise for a lot of people.

0:17:25.600 --> 0:17:27.280
<v Speaker 4>Do you want to talk about assets as well?

0:17:27.720 --> 0:17:29.600
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, we love assets, So.

0:17:31.119 --> 0:17:34.800
<v Speaker 4>I think this is interesting about psychology in the market. Right,

0:17:34.840 --> 0:17:39.040
<v Speaker 4>We've had this whole wave of let's focus on the

0:17:39.160 --> 0:17:43.360
<v Speaker 4>dollar being doomed, that we're going to dedollarize and so forth, right,

0:17:43.920 --> 0:17:46.680
<v Speaker 4>and then you look at what's actually happening in the market, right,

0:17:47.440 --> 0:17:51.040
<v Speaker 4>and the currency that in the narrative is perceived to

0:17:51.080 --> 0:17:54.880
<v Speaker 4>be the new alternative to the dollar, the Chinese currency see,

0:17:54.920 --> 0:17:59.680
<v Speaker 4>and why it's literally going weaker every day, not every

0:17:59.680 --> 0:18:02.280
<v Speaker 4>single but if you look at the chat since January,

0:18:02.920 --> 0:18:05.800
<v Speaker 4>there are so few strengthening days, right, and we just

0:18:05.880 --> 0:18:10.159
<v Speaker 4>have a long trend now of dollar gains and c

0:18:10.280 --> 0:18:13.160
<v Speaker 4>andhy weakness. It's just so interesting, right that you can

0:18:13.200 --> 0:18:15.840
<v Speaker 4>have a disconnect between a narrative that if you read

0:18:15.880 --> 0:18:17.919
<v Speaker 4>all those stories, it look like, okay, the dollar's going

0:18:18.000 --> 0:18:19.960
<v Speaker 4>to die tomorrow, right, and then you look at what's

0:18:19.960 --> 0:18:23.000
<v Speaker 4>actually going on in the market, and the CNY.

0:18:22.800 --> 0:18:23.760
<v Speaker 3>Is having trouble.

0:18:24.000 --> 0:18:26.120
<v Speaker 4>Literally you can look at a lot of capital flow

0:18:26.160 --> 0:18:28.080
<v Speaker 4>data as well, but they're just in the price actions.

0:18:28.119 --> 0:18:46.919
<v Speaker 2>It's just stunning, well that, I mean deja vu again.

0:18:47.400 --> 0:18:50.080
<v Speaker 2>I first met yen's because I was a currency reporter

0:18:50.119 --> 0:18:53.720
<v Speaker 2>and I was obsessed with that theme in like twenty seventeen,

0:18:53.760 --> 0:18:56.400
<v Speaker 2>twenty eighteen, Oh my gosh, when will do you want

0:18:56.520 --> 0:18:59.359
<v Speaker 2>displace the dollar as the global reserve currency? And I

0:18:59.359 --> 0:19:00.919
<v Speaker 2>think some and said to me, I don't think it

0:19:00.920 --> 0:19:03.959
<v Speaker 2>was you like you will write this story every five years,

0:19:04.000 --> 0:19:06.359
<v Speaker 2>like it becomes a narrative and then it dies, like

0:19:06.560 --> 0:19:10.040
<v Speaker 2>nothing will displace the dollar. And it feels like we're

0:19:10.080 --> 0:19:12.879
<v Speaker 2>in that part of the arc again where people are

0:19:12.920 --> 0:19:15.400
<v Speaker 2>realizing that, Okay, the dollar's not going anywhere.

0:19:15.480 --> 0:19:18.600
<v Speaker 4>I get so many questions on it that I actually wrote.

0:19:18.680 --> 0:19:22.679
<v Speaker 4>I wrote a public substack today that's called a brief

0:19:22.840 --> 0:19:26.359
<v Speaker 4>History of Dollar Hatred. I tweeted it out as well.

0:19:26.600 --> 0:19:29.840
<v Speaker 4>Because we go through these waves, and I've been doing

0:19:29.880 --> 0:19:32.439
<v Speaker 4>this for about a little bit more than twenty years now, right,

0:19:32.480 --> 0:19:34.680
<v Speaker 4>I've been through free waves like there was one before

0:19:34.720 --> 0:19:36.840
<v Speaker 4>the global financial crisis where people say, oh, the US

0:19:36.920 --> 0:19:39.400
<v Speaker 4>current account definit is so big, the dollar's going to die.

0:19:39.880 --> 0:19:43.399
<v Speaker 4>Then there was you know, from twenty ten to twenty thirteen,

0:19:43.480 --> 0:19:46.160
<v Speaker 4>or sellers, ah, the Fed is printing so much money

0:19:46.200 --> 0:19:48.720
<v Speaker 4>que infinity is Dollar's going to die. And now this

0:19:48.880 --> 0:19:51.720
<v Speaker 4>year we've had a China has a much better currency.

0:19:51.760 --> 0:19:53.480
<v Speaker 4>The dollar's going to die. Right, So we go through

0:19:53.480 --> 0:19:57.200
<v Speaker 4>these phases, and then you look at how the dollar's trading.

0:19:58.119 --> 0:20:01.359
<v Speaker 4>Dollars is strong, doesn't matter how you look at it,

0:20:01.640 --> 0:20:05.720
<v Speaker 4>normal exchange rate, real exchange rate, which index it's a

0:20:05.760 --> 0:20:08.280
<v Speaker 4>strong currency. There's no evidence that the dollar is about

0:20:08.280 --> 0:20:11.479
<v Speaker 4>to collapse. Doesn't mean it couldn't collapse in the future, right,

0:20:11.520 --> 0:20:14.400
<v Speaker 4>But it's not. It's not something that is in motion yet.

0:20:15.080 --> 0:20:17.320
<v Speaker 2>What is that a function of rate?

0:20:17.760 --> 0:20:18.000
<v Speaker 3>Now?

0:20:18.240 --> 0:20:21.840
<v Speaker 2>Is it you know, the Federal Reserve having you know,

0:20:21.920 --> 0:20:26.320
<v Speaker 2>still on its hiking path higher terminal rate than everyone

0:20:26.359 --> 0:20:27.920
<v Speaker 2>else it seems like at least at this moment, or

0:20:28.000 --> 0:20:31.480
<v Speaker 2>is this more about other economies, other central banks not

0:20:31.520 --> 0:20:32.160
<v Speaker 2>looking as hot.

0:20:32.520 --> 0:20:34.520
<v Speaker 4>Well, we can keep it very simple, right, So we're

0:20:34.520 --> 0:20:37.399
<v Speaker 4>discussing how much above five percent interest rates should go

0:20:37.440 --> 0:20:40.160
<v Speaker 4>in the US, right, that's the debate we're having every day.

0:20:40.880 --> 0:20:43.800
<v Speaker 4>And then in China right now, the debate is whether

0:20:43.840 --> 0:20:45.840
<v Speaker 4>they have to lower interest rates below two percent?

0:20:46.040 --> 0:20:48.480
<v Speaker 3>Right, we're going lower every day, right.

0:20:48.560 --> 0:20:50.720
<v Speaker 4>So it used to be the case that interest rates

0:20:50.760 --> 0:20:53.160
<v Speaker 4>we're much much higher in China than the United States, right,

0:20:53.160 --> 0:20:54.680
<v Speaker 4>and now it's totally flip.

0:20:54.800 --> 0:20:54.960
<v Speaker 3>Right.

0:20:55.040 --> 0:20:57.600
<v Speaker 4>So I don't do analysis based on one verbal but

0:20:57.640 --> 0:21:00.280
<v Speaker 4>that's a pretty important veribal and it's like showing a

0:21:00.400 --> 0:21:03.200
<v Speaker 4>very dramatic effect. Like the other thing that I think

0:21:03.640 --> 0:21:06.919
<v Speaker 4>it's sort of grotesque about this debate about okay, is

0:21:06.960 --> 0:21:14.040
<v Speaker 4>the Chinese currency gonna take all the reserve currency money

0:21:14.080 --> 0:21:17.440
<v Speaker 4>like from central bank reserves instead of the dollar. Right,

0:21:17.760 --> 0:21:20.080
<v Speaker 4>you look at the capital flow, which is what I'm

0:21:20.080 --> 0:21:22.960
<v Speaker 4>doing every day, and literally since the beginning of twenty

0:21:23.160 --> 0:21:26.280
<v Speaker 4>twenty two, there's not been a single month with any

0:21:26.359 --> 0:21:29.760
<v Speaker 4>meaningful inflows into China. Nobody wants their bonds. How can

0:21:29.760 --> 0:21:31.600
<v Speaker 4>you have a reserve currency when people don't want to

0:21:31.600 --> 0:21:35.199
<v Speaker 4>hold their bonds. So there's a lot of stuff missing.

0:21:35.520 --> 0:21:38.480
<v Speaker 4>It's not because everything is fantastic in the US, right,

0:21:39.280 --> 0:21:42.040
<v Speaker 4>we have political issues. We talk about that ceiling, which

0:21:42.080 --> 0:21:44.919
<v Speaker 4>really is a silly thing, like why do we have

0:21:44.960 --> 0:21:48.280
<v Speaker 4>such a bizarre system? Right, So it's not that everything's

0:21:48.320 --> 0:21:51.119
<v Speaker 4>fantastic in the US, but we need to have an alternative.

0:21:51.160 --> 0:21:52.760
<v Speaker 4>To have a real threat to the dollar, needs to

0:21:52.760 --> 0:21:56.040
<v Speaker 4>be an alternative, and it's so hard to find a

0:21:56.080 --> 0:21:59.000
<v Speaker 4>real alternative, and the Chinese currency is definitely not one.

0:21:59.000 --> 0:22:00.960
<v Speaker 4>If people don't want the bond is not all alternative.

0:22:01.560 --> 0:22:03.440
<v Speaker 1>Katy, I'm so glad you're here because I know nothing

0:22:03.480 --> 0:22:04.120
<v Speaker 1>about currency.

0:22:04.240 --> 0:22:06.800
<v Speaker 2>This is so fun. It's like twenty nineteen again. It's great.

0:22:07.080 --> 0:22:11.000
<v Speaker 1>Well, Yen's Nordvick, thank you so much for joining the podcast.

0:22:11.040 --> 0:22:14.120
<v Speaker 1>This has been a real pleasure, but I'm gonna hold

0:22:14.160 --> 0:22:17.520
<v Speaker 1>both of you hostage until we play. Craziest thing we

0:22:17.560 --> 0:22:18.840
<v Speaker 1>saw in markets this week.

0:22:19.080 --> 0:22:21.520
<v Speaker 2>This is the most ready I've ever been for craziest.

0:22:21.160 --> 0:22:23.240
<v Speaker 1>Are you sure? Okay, you go first? Since wait, you

0:22:23.320 --> 0:22:23.680
<v Speaker 1>tease this?

0:22:23.960 --> 0:22:27.359
<v Speaker 2>So I cover ETFs now? Yes, So I moved on

0:22:27.520 --> 0:22:30.840
<v Speaker 2>from the world of currencies. I love covering bond ETFs.

0:22:30.840 --> 0:22:32.320
<v Speaker 2>Obviously it's been the year of the bond. But the

0:22:32.359 --> 0:22:35.199
<v Speaker 2>craziest thing I saw in markets this week I was

0:22:35.240 --> 0:22:41.760
<v Speaker 2>looking at a triple leveraged long duration treasuries ETF. So

0:22:41.840 --> 0:22:46.480
<v Speaker 2>it's twenty year treasuries and then you triple that exposure.

0:22:46.600 --> 0:22:49.600
<v Speaker 2>Bonds are already so volatile, but apparently people really want

0:22:49.600 --> 0:22:53.000
<v Speaker 2>this because this ETF it's the direction daily twenty plus

0:22:53.119 --> 0:22:57.439
<v Speaker 2>year treasury bowl three times ETF. The ticker is TMF uh.

0:22:57.680 --> 0:23:01.479
<v Speaker 2>It's assets have hit two billion dollars. It's more than

0:23:01.560 --> 0:23:06.520
<v Speaker 2>double this year alone in assets. People just really want

0:23:06.880 --> 0:23:07.919
<v Speaker 2>very volatile bonds.

0:23:07.920 --> 0:23:10.560
<v Speaker 1>I guess, Oh my gosh, I want a calmer market.

0:23:10.920 --> 0:23:11.879
<v Speaker 2>No, not these people.

0:23:12.240 --> 0:23:13.679
<v Speaker 1>I want calm. I won't calm.

0:23:13.760 --> 0:23:16.840
<v Speaker 2>I asked Dave Nadig over at a Verify, what's going on?

0:23:17.000 --> 0:23:20.800
<v Speaker 2>Who's buying this like, who the heck wants TMF right now?

0:23:20.800 --> 0:23:24.040
<v Speaker 2>And he said, it's all headline day traders. Wow, yeah,

0:23:24.080 --> 0:23:25.440
<v Speaker 2>that's cool, that is cool.

0:23:25.480 --> 0:23:26.440
<v Speaker 1>Okay, you were prepared.

0:23:26.640 --> 0:23:27.399
<v Speaker 2>Yeah. Y.

0:23:28.640 --> 0:23:33.520
<v Speaker 4>So we've had a bit of movement in some semiconductor

0:23:33.800 --> 0:23:36.880
<v Speaker 4>stocks over the last I think so two weeks. So,

0:23:36.880 --> 0:23:39.520
<v Speaker 4>so I'll give you a stat from market Rita. So

0:23:39.600 --> 0:23:44.320
<v Speaker 4>we we look at all the volumes and those instruments,

0:23:45.080 --> 0:23:49.280
<v Speaker 4>and some of these semiconductor companies they just have totally

0:23:49.480 --> 0:23:52.040
<v Speaker 4>insane volumes. Right if you look at the volume and

0:23:52.080 --> 0:23:55.000
<v Speaker 4>that you've learned about the normal distribution in school, right,

0:23:55.000 --> 0:23:57.760
<v Speaker 4>if you get like two standard deviations, it's big and free,

0:23:57.800 --> 0:24:01.320
<v Speaker 4>it's very big. I've seen sick, seen standard the aviations.

0:24:01.359 --> 0:24:04.080
<v Speaker 4>Like the volume was above normal here this week. So

0:24:04.240 --> 0:24:07.120
<v Speaker 4>there's definitely a little bit of focus on semiconductors like.

0:24:07.080 --> 0:24:09.240
<v Speaker 1>Con video or which stocks are.

0:24:09.080 --> 0:24:12.119
<v Speaker 4>We talking about some of the like my actual so

0:24:12.240 --> 0:24:14.480
<v Speaker 4>for some of the like second tier semiconductors, like just

0:24:14.560 --> 0:24:15.320
<v Speaker 4>crazy volume.

0:24:15.680 --> 0:24:17.800
<v Speaker 2>Well I would imagine people are trying to find the

0:24:17.880 --> 0:24:21.800
<v Speaker 2>next and video, right, Holy moly, yes, well, Tana.

0:24:21.880 --> 0:24:24.840
<v Speaker 1>I have trouble pronouncing video and video.

0:24:25.400 --> 0:24:27.840
<v Speaker 4>Why I said sector pronunciation?

0:24:28.040 --> 0:24:31.040
<v Speaker 2>I said no video on videos and I got like

0:24:31.080 --> 0:24:33.439
<v Speaker 2>three people paying me and they were like, it's end videos.

0:24:33.440 --> 0:24:34.399
<v Speaker 1>Oh is it end video?

0:24:34.440 --> 0:24:35.080
<v Speaker 4>So I was right.

0:24:35.440 --> 0:24:37.320
<v Speaker 2>I just know it's not no video. I feel like

0:24:37.320 --> 0:24:38.960
<v Speaker 2>I toggle between ND video and.

0:24:39.720 --> 0:24:41.760
<v Speaker 1>I feel superior now because I got it right.

0:24:41.840 --> 0:24:44.520
<v Speaker 2>It's definitely not no no video.

0:24:44.920 --> 0:24:46.040
<v Speaker 1>Let's see who hits us up.

0:24:46.200 --> 0:24:47.080
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, not video.

0:24:48.280 --> 0:24:50.680
<v Speaker 1>Okay, it's my turn, and I'm gonna make you both

0:24:50.720 --> 0:24:51.320
<v Speaker 1>play a game.

0:24:51.800 --> 0:24:52.040
<v Speaker 2>Okay.

0:24:52.119 --> 0:24:55.280
<v Speaker 1>Mike usually does this role, and he's very good at officiating,

0:24:55.359 --> 0:24:58.719
<v Speaker 1>as like the game master. But I'm gonna read it

0:24:58.720 --> 0:25:00.879
<v Speaker 1>you a little description and then I'm going to have

0:25:00.920 --> 0:25:05.359
<v Speaker 1>you play. The price is precise, okay, So it's not

0:25:05.440 --> 0:25:07.480
<v Speaker 1>the price is right, it's the prices precise.

0:25:07.560 --> 0:25:08.720
<v Speaker 2>So what are the rules.

0:25:08.760 --> 0:25:11.399
<v Speaker 1>It's the same rules. Oh okay, we just can't call it, okay,

0:25:12.080 --> 0:25:16.120
<v Speaker 1>a Japanese ice cream. This is good, so far? Right,

0:25:16.160 --> 0:25:19.040
<v Speaker 1>so far just set the world record as the most

0:25:19.080 --> 0:25:23.840
<v Speaker 1>expensive ice cream ever. It's made of truffles from Italy

0:25:24.200 --> 0:25:28.199
<v Speaker 1>and they go for fifteen thousand dollars per kilogram, and

0:25:28.240 --> 0:25:32.040
<v Speaker 1>it also has Parmisano Vergiano in it and Saki Lee's

0:25:32.280 --> 0:25:36.600
<v Speaker 1>which is left over paced from Saki production. And when

0:25:36.640 --> 0:25:39.400
<v Speaker 1>you buy this ice cream, you also get a handcrafted

0:25:39.440 --> 0:25:43.440
<v Speaker 1>metal spoon that's made with materials used to build temples

0:25:43.560 --> 0:25:44.480
<v Speaker 1>and shrines.

0:25:44.920 --> 0:25:47.480
<v Speaker 2>I'm sorry, I thought this was the craziest thing in markets.

0:25:47.600 --> 0:25:51.640
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, it's fine, Okay, I'm giving myself a pass. Okay,

0:25:52.200 --> 0:25:55.400
<v Speaker 1>if you wanted to order this ice cream, how much

0:25:55.440 --> 0:25:59.720
<v Speaker 1>are you paying for it in dollars? And it's the

0:25:59.760 --> 0:26:01.960
<v Speaker 1>most expensive ice cream ever? And you go first?

0:26:02.240 --> 0:26:04.440
<v Speaker 4>Okay, I think it's twenty thousand dollars?

0:26:05.080 --> 0:26:08.000
<v Speaker 2>Katie? Is this for? What unit? Is this for a

0:26:08.000 --> 0:26:09.960
<v Speaker 2>cup of ice cream? A scoop of ice cream?

0:26:10.080 --> 0:26:12.040
<v Speaker 1>I think you get a little bit of ice cream

0:26:12.040 --> 0:26:16.960
<v Speaker 1>because yeah, like a pint maybe because this the story

0:26:17.040 --> 0:26:18.920
<v Speaker 1>said that you should try to eat it as soon

0:26:18.920 --> 0:26:22.600
<v Speaker 1>as possible, like doesn't technically go bad, but you should

0:26:22.680 --> 0:26:26.600
<v Speaker 1>eat it within ten days of getting it, so okay,

0:26:27.080 --> 0:26:29.480
<v Speaker 1>and you're supposed to put truffle oil on top of it.

0:26:29.680 --> 0:26:31.880
<v Speaker 2>I'm gonna say, I feel like you kind of low

0:26:31.920 --> 0:26:35.400
<v Speaker 2>balled it. So I'm going to say, like two hundred

0:26:35.400 --> 0:26:36.440
<v Speaker 2>and fifty thousand.

0:26:36.480 --> 0:26:37.399
<v Speaker 1>For ice cream.

0:26:37.680 --> 0:26:39.400
<v Speaker 2>I have no idea.

0:26:41.280 --> 0:26:42.600
<v Speaker 4>Twenty thousand ice cream is cheap?

0:26:43.040 --> 0:26:45.080
<v Speaker 1>All these people and tell them to up their price.

0:26:45.119 --> 0:26:45.520
<v Speaker 2>How wrong?

0:26:45.560 --> 0:26:49.000
<v Speaker 1>Am I you're both so wrong. What is it six thousand,

0:26:49.119 --> 0:26:51.399
<v Speaker 1>six hundred ninety six dollars.

0:26:51.640 --> 0:26:52.480
<v Speaker 3>Only three times?

0:26:52.560 --> 0:26:55.359
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, we're going to rage. Quit this podcast.

0:26:56.000 --> 0:26:59.439
<v Speaker 1>Slam your cups down, slam your fists down. Anyway, it

0:26:59.480 --> 0:27:01.920
<v Speaker 1>was a great pleasure to have you both on here

0:27:01.960 --> 0:27:05.600
<v Speaker 1>and have you guests so very incorrectly about this ice cream.

0:27:05.720 --> 0:27:07.080
<v Speaker 2>Thank you for the opportunity.

0:27:07.480 --> 0:27:10.639
<v Speaker 1>Thank you, and YenS, thank you so much for joining

0:27:10.680 --> 0:27:13.199
<v Speaker 1>us on the podcast this week. YenS Nordwick, co founder

0:27:13.240 --> 0:27:14.080
<v Speaker 1>and CEO of.

0:27:14.080 --> 0:27:16.320
<v Speaker 4>Market Reader, I hope with come back soon.

0:27:16.800 --> 0:27:18.200
<v Speaker 1>I hope so too. Thank you both.

0:27:18.359 --> 0:27:27.880
<v Speaker 2>That was fun What Goes Up.

0:27:27.960 --> 0:27:30.720
<v Speaker 1>We'll be back next week. Until then, you can find

0:27:30.800 --> 0:27:34.320
<v Speaker 1>us on the Bloomberg Terminal, website and app, or wherever

0:27:34.359 --> 0:27:37.120
<v Speaker 1>you get your podcasts. We'd love it if you took

0:27:37.119 --> 0:27:39.320
<v Speaker 1>the time to rate and review the show so more

0:27:39.320 --> 0:27:42.360
<v Speaker 1>listeners can find us. You can find us on Twitter,

0:27:43.119 --> 0:27:47.639
<v Speaker 1>follow me at Goldana Hirich. Mike Reagan is at Reaganonymous.

0:27:48.119 --> 0:27:52.640
<v Speaker 1>You can also follow Bloomberg Podcasts at podcasts. What Goes

0:27:52.720 --> 0:27:55.240
<v Speaker 1>Up is produced by Stacey Wong, and our head of

0:27:55.280 --> 0:27:58.639
<v Speaker 1>podcasts is Stage Bauman. Thanks for listening. We'll see you

0:27:58.640 --> 0:28:02.520
<v Speaker 1>next week at b