WEBVTT - An Extended Breakdown of the Fed and Banks (Podcast)

0:00:00.840 --> 0:00:04.000
<v Speaker 1>Welcome to the Bloomberg Markets Podcast. I'm Paul Sweeney, alongside

0:00:04.040 --> 0:00:05.280
<v Speaker 1>my co host Matt Miller.

0:00:05.640 --> 0:00:09.600
<v Speaker 2>Every business day we bring you interviews from CEOs, market pros,

0:00:09.720 --> 0:00:13.600
<v Speaker 2>and Bloomberg experts, along with essential market moving news.

0:00:14.160 --> 0:00:17.279
<v Speaker 1>Find the Bloomberg Markets Podcast called Apple Podcasts or wherever

0:00:17.360 --> 0:00:20.480
<v Speaker 1>you listen to podcasts, and at Bloomberg dot com slash podcast.

0:00:21.280 --> 0:00:22.960
<v Speaker 1>Let's bring in some smart people who do this stuff

0:00:23.000 --> 0:00:24.240
<v Speaker 1>for a living. We'll kind of see if you can

0:00:24.280 --> 0:00:26.079
<v Speaker 1>break it down a little bit. Chris Whalen, founder of

0:00:26.079 --> 0:00:29.080
<v Speaker 1>Whale and Global Advisors, joins us here and Hugh Henry

0:00:29.080 --> 0:00:32.200
<v Speaker 1>have Aklectica Asset Management. They joined for an extended round

0:00:32.240 --> 0:00:36.440
<v Speaker 1>table on what we might be seeing in these markets. Hugh,

0:00:36.440 --> 0:00:39.120
<v Speaker 1>thanks so much for joining us here in our studio here.

0:00:39.520 --> 0:00:41.080
<v Speaker 1>What do you make of the past few days that

0:00:41.200 --> 0:00:44.839
<v Speaker 1>fed the ECB. We've got some banks kind of I

0:00:44.880 --> 0:00:46.839
<v Speaker 1>don't know if it's crisis or not. That's debatable, but

0:00:46.840 --> 0:00:48.280
<v Speaker 1>there's a lot going on out there. What do you

0:00:48.280 --> 0:00:48.680
<v Speaker 1>make of it?

0:00:49.360 --> 0:00:52.680
<v Speaker 3>I don't think it's debatable. Okay, you know this is

0:00:53.760 --> 0:00:58.840
<v Speaker 3>and we went over the clip, but I mean, seriously,

0:00:58.960 --> 0:01:04.640
<v Speaker 3>this this is real, right. I think the FED will

0:01:04.680 --> 0:01:09.560
<v Speaker 3>stand charged with the greatest FED folly in a very

0:01:09.600 --> 0:01:10.040
<v Speaker 3>long time.

0:01:10.120 --> 0:01:12.319
<v Speaker 2>And in terms of raising rates too fast or what

0:01:13.120 --> 0:01:13.960
<v Speaker 2>so or too late.

0:01:14.080 --> 0:01:18.240
<v Speaker 3>So it is a fact that they raise rates fast, yeah,

0:01:18.319 --> 0:01:22.440
<v Speaker 3>in terms of the timeline and the magnitude. And typically

0:01:22.760 --> 0:01:25.680
<v Speaker 3>the FED doesn't do that. And there's a reason for

0:01:25.720 --> 0:01:29.520
<v Speaker 3>that because your bank is effectively like a hedge fund.

0:01:29.800 --> 0:01:34.320
<v Speaker 3>Yeah it has it gets the money from deposits, right,

0:01:34.520 --> 0:01:37.039
<v Speaker 3>but there's no gate. Yeah, you can take like with

0:01:37.120 --> 0:01:39.039
<v Speaker 3>a hedge fund, they insist. I mean, if you're in

0:01:39.080 --> 0:01:41.160
<v Speaker 3>like one of those big hedge funds, try getting your

0:01:41.160 --> 0:01:42.959
<v Speaker 3>money out. It takes you to like, you know, it

0:01:42.959 --> 0:01:45.720
<v Speaker 3>takes you two years with that with the iPhone. With

0:01:45.760 --> 0:01:48.240
<v Speaker 3>the banks, so the gate issue, right, But the other

0:01:48.320 --> 0:01:51.120
<v Speaker 3>issue is that the assets are loans and it takes

0:01:51.320 --> 0:01:53.960
<v Speaker 3>kind of like two years to reprice your loan book

0:01:54.360 --> 0:01:58.560
<v Speaker 3>so that you can raise your CDs without destroying your

0:01:58.560 --> 0:02:01.280
<v Speaker 3>net interest margin like with our going into losses. So

0:02:01.320 --> 0:02:03.960
<v Speaker 3>the FED is cognizant of that, right, and it takes

0:02:04.000 --> 0:02:09.000
<v Speaker 3>its time. This was an impatient Fed, okay, And then

0:02:09.040 --> 0:02:10.679
<v Speaker 3>what we've discovered.

0:02:10.160 --> 0:02:12.800
<v Speaker 2>Well, first two patient, right, and then impatient.

0:02:13.240 --> 0:02:17.040
<v Speaker 3>Well, I think the world of economicists has changed profoundly.

0:02:17.120 --> 0:02:19.120
<v Speaker 3>But we may come back to that. But yeah, and

0:02:19.160 --> 0:02:24.640
<v Speaker 3>then impatient. But it's the deposit flight revealed. There's always

0:02:24.680 --> 0:02:28.280
<v Speaker 3>a revelation in markets, and the revelation has been the

0:02:28.480 --> 0:02:34.240
<v Speaker 3>conceit and the arrogance of a whole to maturity bond portfolio.

0:02:34.480 --> 0:02:38.960
<v Speaker 3>And that was fine, okay when rates were stable, but

0:02:39.040 --> 0:02:43.880
<v Speaker 3>when you aggressively hid them. And then with this technology jump,

0:02:43.960 --> 0:02:47.400
<v Speaker 3>with the iPhone and with the deposit flight, suddenly you

0:02:47.600 --> 0:02:51.360
<v Speaker 3>had to mark because deposits were fleeing, You had to

0:02:51.440 --> 0:02:57.000
<v Speaker 3>reduce the HTM portfolio, and suddenly you discover that you've

0:02:57.040 --> 0:02:59.800
<v Speaker 3>wiped out your shareholder funds. There was a FED report

0:03:00.120 --> 0:03:02.640
<v Speaker 3>back I think to the twenty third of March, which revealed,

0:03:02.639 --> 0:03:06.240
<v Speaker 3>as we know that total bank assets in the US

0:03:06.360 --> 0:03:08.800
<v Speaker 3>twenty three trillion dollars. What does that give? Give us

0:03:08.840 --> 0:03:14.480
<v Speaker 3>a reference? That's one time's GDP. Yeah, and you had

0:03:14.480 --> 0:03:19.480
<v Speaker 3>about twenty three billion of shareholder funds in fractional reserves

0:03:19.520 --> 0:03:23.200
<v Speaker 3>and we're kind of leveraged entities. But the marked market

0:03:23.320 --> 0:03:27.320
<v Speaker 3>or the unmarked loss was two point three trillion dollars. Okay, Right,

0:03:27.360 --> 0:03:30.080
<v Speaker 3>so we're talking about your metaphorically the kind of notion

0:03:30.120 --> 0:03:33.120
<v Speaker 3>of the dead people walking the banking sector, and that's

0:03:33.240 --> 0:03:36.440
<v Speaker 3>kind of I'm afraid that's on the Federal reserve. We

0:03:36.560 --> 0:03:39.880
<v Speaker 3>are staring at a scenartio which is very similar to

0:03:39.960 --> 0:03:43.760
<v Speaker 3>nineteen thirty where we had the widespread failure of the

0:03:43.880 --> 0:03:44.920
<v Speaker 3>US banking community.

0:03:45.040 --> 0:03:46.880
<v Speaker 2>Chris Whalen, what do you think about that? I want

0:03:46.880 --> 0:03:48.280
<v Speaker 2>to bring you in here because you're one of the

0:03:48.480 --> 0:03:52.960
<v Speaker 2>foremost bank analysts in the country. What do you think

0:03:53.000 --> 0:03:55.800
<v Speaker 2>about Hugh's point that the FED really kind of has

0:03:55.840 --> 0:03:56.760
<v Speaker 2>blood on its hands.

0:03:57.880 --> 0:04:00.280
<v Speaker 4>Well, I think I totally agree with Hugh in the

0:04:00.520 --> 0:04:04.480
<v Speaker 4>nineteen thirty metaphor is the correct one, because you know,

0:04:04.640 --> 0:04:08.559
<v Speaker 4>this isn't the two thousand and eight which was basically

0:04:08.640 --> 0:04:12.119
<v Speaker 4>just a bit of a tantrum around private mortgages. This

0:04:12.200 --> 0:04:18.000
<v Speaker 4>is solvency. This is a FED induced you know, panic

0:04:18.920 --> 0:04:20.839
<v Speaker 4>that looks a lot like the eighties. By the way,

0:04:20.880 --> 0:04:24.719
<v Speaker 4>with Paul Volker, the last time we had benchmarks four

0:04:24.760 --> 0:04:27.800
<v Speaker 4>or five points about bank deposit rates, it was back

0:04:27.839 --> 0:04:31.240
<v Speaker 4>in the eighties. We destroyed the snls, but the snls

0:04:31.240 --> 0:04:35.920
<v Speaker 4>didn't matter. These banks matter. That's the difference. And I

0:04:35.960 --> 0:04:39.120
<v Speaker 4>think that the FED is badly miss you know, they

0:04:39.240 --> 0:04:43.720
<v Speaker 4>panicked in twenty eighteen with the money market crisis in December.

0:04:44.080 --> 0:04:47.320
<v Speaker 4>They started dumping reserves into the system the next year,

0:04:47.760 --> 0:04:50.320
<v Speaker 4>a year before COVID. You can see it on the

0:04:50.320 --> 0:04:55.040
<v Speaker 4>Bloomberg look at the index for Ginny May duration. Wonderful

0:04:55.120 --> 0:04:58.280
<v Speaker 4>chart you guys have on the turbinil. It tells the story.

0:04:58.720 --> 0:05:01.640
<v Speaker 4>So by the time we get to COVID, the duration

0:05:01.839 --> 0:05:05.839
<v Speaker 4>on two point two trillion dollars in Giny MA securities

0:05:05.960 --> 0:05:08.479
<v Speaker 4>is one, which is almost impossible.

0:05:08.760 --> 0:05:11.400
<v Speaker 1>But Chris, I mean we we've heard from some analysts

0:05:11.440 --> 0:05:14.160
<v Speaker 1>that most or a lot of these I would say

0:05:14.200 --> 0:05:18.520
<v Speaker 1>most of these banks they have enough capital.

0:05:18.560 --> 0:05:21.200
<v Speaker 2>And let's talk specifically about pac West. I had our

0:05:21.560 --> 0:05:24.840
<v Speaker 2>regional banks analyst in here, Herman Chan. He said they

0:05:24.839 --> 0:05:27.520
<v Speaker 2>have one hundred and eighty eight percent assets to deposits.

0:05:28.600 --> 0:05:31.479
<v Speaker 4>I know, but it doesn't matter. These are going concerns.

0:05:31.800 --> 0:05:34.559
<v Speaker 4>When the stock price gets two point three times buck,

0:05:34.880 --> 0:05:37.120
<v Speaker 4>that tells you that the bank's going out of business.

0:05:38.400 --> 0:05:41.240
<v Speaker 4>It's like the politicians. They get voted on every day

0:05:41.279 --> 0:05:44.440
<v Speaker 4>in the stock market. Right, we're voting on pack West

0:05:44.560 --> 0:05:45.120
<v Speaker 4>this morning.

0:05:45.720 --> 0:05:49.560
<v Speaker 2>And you explains to me like I'm five, okay, if

0:05:49.640 --> 0:05:52.279
<v Speaker 2>every if every deposit goes into pack West and says

0:05:52.320 --> 0:05:54.000
<v Speaker 2>I want my money out. They can have it out

0:05:54.440 --> 0:05:56.120
<v Speaker 2>as far as I understand it right now.

0:05:56.600 --> 0:06:00.279
<v Speaker 4>No, you're thinking of this like it's a wonderful life. No,

0:06:00.839 --> 0:06:03.440
<v Speaker 4>that's not the way financial markets work. They want to

0:06:03.480 --> 0:06:06.320
<v Speaker 4>know that that bank is a going concern, and when

0:06:06.360 --> 0:06:11.280
<v Speaker 4>the stock price gets as low, the business counterparties back away,

0:06:11.960 --> 0:06:14.240
<v Speaker 4>and the formula and the bloomberg by the way that

0:06:14.360 --> 0:06:18.240
<v Speaker 4>generates probability of default is geared off of the equity price.

0:06:18.839 --> 0:06:21.560
<v Speaker 4>Uh huh, okay, what do you think the hedge funds use?

0:06:22.240 --> 0:06:23.240
<v Speaker 4>That's how it works.

0:06:23.720 --> 0:06:29.400
<v Speaker 2>So I'm typing it in right now, Jack W Equity DRSK.

0:06:29.640 --> 0:06:32.800
<v Speaker 4>What is it like four hundred basis points?

0:06:32.200 --> 0:06:33.440
<v Speaker 2>So yeah.

0:06:34.279 --> 0:06:36.520
<v Speaker 4>So my point is there's a lot of banks behind

0:06:36.560 --> 0:06:39.320
<v Speaker 4>this flat and you know I own Western Alliance. I

0:06:39.360 --> 0:06:42.680
<v Speaker 4>love that bank Ato point seven times book. I think

0:06:42.720 --> 0:06:45.200
<v Speaker 4>they'll be fine. They had already traded off because the

0:06:45.279 --> 0:06:47.719
<v Speaker 4>mortgage market had come off. That was one of the

0:06:47.720 --> 0:06:50.640
<v Speaker 4>best performing banks in the country in twenty twenty one.

0:06:51.640 --> 0:06:54.680
<v Speaker 4>So you know what's happened is the FED wants to

0:06:54.720 --> 0:06:59.440
<v Speaker 4>pretend that they can have a traditional anti inflation scenario

0:07:00.200 --> 0:07:03.839
<v Speaker 4>raising target rates, but they're ignoring the manipulation of the

0:07:03.960 --> 0:07:06.560
<v Speaker 4>bond market that came with quantitative es.

0:07:06.839 --> 0:07:10.040
<v Speaker 2>Let me get you in here, because the securities. You

0:07:10.120 --> 0:07:12.560
<v Speaker 2>made your money and your name by figuring out how

0:07:12.640 --> 0:07:14.840
<v Speaker 2>this kind of thing is going to play out? Right,

0:07:15.680 --> 0:07:17.800
<v Speaker 2>how does how does this look to you right now?

0:07:17.880 --> 0:07:21.520
<v Speaker 2>I mean we've had a few days of this sixty,

0:07:22.160 --> 0:07:25.400
<v Speaker 2>you know, fifty percent drops in these bank prices, and

0:07:25.480 --> 0:07:28.320
<v Speaker 2>yet the FED came out yesterday and said, you know,

0:07:28.880 --> 0:07:30.880
<v Speaker 2>the US banking system is sound and resilient.

0:07:31.680 --> 0:07:37.520
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, lyyer puns on fire. So you know, I mean,

0:07:37.520 --> 0:07:42.600
<v Speaker 3>I'm now really representing acid capitalism. You know, the eclectica

0:07:42.680 --> 0:07:44.560
<v Speaker 3>is no more. This is the world of us at capitalism.

0:07:44.760 --> 0:07:50.480
<v Speaker 3>There are occasional ripples through risk assets when people kind

0:07:50.480 --> 0:07:53.280
<v Speaker 3>of get excited with this notion that the Treasury might

0:07:53.400 --> 0:07:57.040
<v Speaker 3>come in and ensure old deposits. I want to tell

0:07:57.040 --> 0:08:01.520
<v Speaker 3>you that we are past the point of relevancy for

0:08:01.640 --> 0:08:06.040
<v Speaker 3>that procedure, my fear, and I do not say this lightly.

0:08:06.080 --> 0:08:12.080
<v Speaker 3>I've given it great consideration given the peril present peril

0:08:12.160 --> 0:08:17.160
<v Speaker 3>with regard to the magnitude of losses on security portfolios

0:08:17.360 --> 0:08:21.680
<v Speaker 3>held within predominantly the regional banks. Okay, you have to

0:08:21.720 --> 0:08:24.600
<v Speaker 3>cast your mind back to nineteen thirty four and the

0:08:24.600 --> 0:08:27.640
<v Speaker 3>Gold Reserve Act back then, as everyone knows, the US

0:08:27.720 --> 0:08:31.400
<v Speaker 3>citizens in their gold was confiscated. I can actually conceive

0:08:32.000 --> 0:08:34.920
<v Speaker 3>of a federal or Treasury rule coming in and saying

0:08:35.080 --> 0:08:37.880
<v Speaker 3>for the next one hundred and eighty days, you can't

0:08:37.960 --> 0:08:41.160
<v Speaker 3>pull your money out of the banking sector.

0:08:41.200 --> 0:08:41.920
<v Speaker 2>That would be terrified.

0:08:41.960 --> 0:08:43.800
<v Speaker 3>That would be terrified. But let me tell you that

0:08:43.840 --> 0:08:47.800
<v Speaker 3>the issue people are the deposit flight today is not

0:08:47.960 --> 0:08:52.640
<v Speaker 3>people fearing uninsured deposits. It's people saying I'm getting paid

0:08:52.640 --> 0:08:55.680
<v Speaker 3>ten basis points on a CD I need five hundred.

0:08:55.920 --> 0:09:00.760
<v Speaker 3>And what was castraphic about yesterday was the FED raised

0:09:00.840 --> 0:09:03.840
<v Speaker 3>hate hiked again. It went, hey, why don't we just

0:09:04.200 --> 0:09:09.280
<v Speaker 3>encourage more deposit flight. They are do gooders, but they're

0:09:09.360 --> 0:09:12.760
<v Speaker 3>incompetent and they're not seeing the picture. We are on

0:09:12.800 --> 0:09:16.560
<v Speaker 3>the verge of a catastrophe which will rival two thousand

0:09:16.640 --> 0:09:16.959
<v Speaker 3>and eight.

0:09:17.120 --> 0:09:20.240
<v Speaker 2>They keep trying to separate. You know, every FED speaker

0:09:20.240 --> 0:09:21.679
<v Speaker 2>you've heard the last couple of weeks says they want

0:09:21.679 --> 0:09:24.079
<v Speaker 2>to separate monetary policy on the one side with financial

0:09:24.080 --> 0:09:25.560
<v Speaker 2>stability on the other, and they don't want to mix

0:09:25.600 --> 0:09:28.680
<v Speaker 2>the two. Right and and the FED fundraid is a

0:09:28.679 --> 0:09:30.920
<v Speaker 2>monetary policy tool. Chris, what do you think because I've

0:09:30.920 --> 0:09:33.800
<v Speaker 2>asked a lot of people, you know, who do you

0:09:33.880 --> 0:09:36.920
<v Speaker 2>blame for the collapse of SBB, Who do you blame

0:09:38.200 --> 0:09:41.680
<v Speaker 2>for the collapse of signature? And now a first Republic?

0:09:42.040 --> 0:09:42.840
<v Speaker 2>Is it possibly?

0:09:42.960 --> 0:09:43.120
<v Speaker 5>You know?

0:09:43.160 --> 0:09:45.120
<v Speaker 2>The FED raising rates five hundred basis points in a

0:09:45.160 --> 0:09:51.000
<v Speaker 2>year and two a man. Until today, everyone has said no, Well.

0:09:50.720 --> 0:09:53.480
<v Speaker 4>Look, these banks did stupid things. I've written about the

0:09:53.640 --> 0:09:57.560
<v Speaker 4>Silicon Valley particularly, But the key thing is that the

0:09:57.640 --> 0:10:01.199
<v Speaker 4>FED is in a very and dantic sort of way.

0:10:01.240 --> 0:10:03.520
<v Speaker 4>And I love what your guest has been saying. By

0:10:03.520 --> 0:10:06.440
<v Speaker 4>the way, I totally agree, but they want to continue

0:10:06.480 --> 0:10:10.920
<v Speaker 4>to think they can separate monetary policy from financial policy

0:10:11.240 --> 0:10:14.320
<v Speaker 4>when we execute monetary policy in the bond market. For

0:10:14.400 --> 0:10:18.040
<v Speaker 4>Christ's sake, it's not credible for the chairman of the

0:10:18.040 --> 0:10:20.440
<v Speaker 4>FED to get up and tell us yesterday that the

0:10:20.480 --> 0:10:24.360
<v Speaker 4>banking system is fine when the FDIC has already published

0:10:24.400 --> 0:10:28.720
<v Speaker 4>numbers to show that it's insolvent. Okay, the two agencies

0:10:28.800 --> 0:10:30.880
<v Speaker 4>need to talk to one another, and I've spoken to

0:10:30.920 --> 0:10:33.000
<v Speaker 4>governors about this in the past. You know, I worked

0:10:33.000 --> 0:10:35.280
<v Speaker 4>at the FED in New York. They don't talk to

0:10:35.320 --> 0:10:38.320
<v Speaker 4>the Bank supervision people, and when they were on the hill,

0:10:38.679 --> 0:10:41.480
<v Speaker 4>you saw a vice chairman Barr. He was asked, did

0:10:41.480 --> 0:10:45.240
<v Speaker 4>you talk to the bank supervisory staff about your monetary policy,

0:10:45.520 --> 0:10:49.840
<v Speaker 4>about quantitative easing? And the answer is numb. So I

0:10:49.880 --> 0:10:53.079
<v Speaker 4>think we should make economists where ankle bracelets are really do.

0:10:53.760 --> 0:10:56.800
<v Speaker 4>These are the most dangerous people in our society right now,

0:10:57.080 --> 0:10:59.600
<v Speaker 4>and they are going to crash the system. It is very,

0:10:59.760 --> 0:11:01.800
<v Speaker 4>very close to nineteen thirty three months.

0:11:02.040 --> 0:11:05.600
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, yeah, you we had it. Seems like a lot

0:11:05.600 --> 0:11:07.800
<v Speaker 1>of folks are saying we had JP Morgan come in

0:11:07.840 --> 0:11:10.720
<v Speaker 1>and buy First Republic, but Jamie Diamond he can't be

0:11:11.000 --> 0:11:14.280
<v Speaker 1>literally JP Morgan and go out and support the system.

0:11:15.120 --> 0:11:17.840
<v Speaker 1>You have a solution. Do you feel like our regulators

0:11:17.880 --> 0:11:20.080
<v Speaker 1>need to do something now? And if so, what would

0:11:20.080 --> 0:11:20.360
<v Speaker 1>that be.

0:11:21.760 --> 0:11:27.679
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, it's called zup, It's called we gotta be humble

0:11:27.800 --> 0:11:31.280
<v Speaker 3>and we gotta say we kind of got this wrong.

0:11:31.679 --> 0:11:32.320
<v Speaker 6>My point.

0:11:32.320 --> 0:11:36.160
<v Speaker 3>Hey, listen, we've got debt which is approximately four times

0:11:36.440 --> 0:11:40.640
<v Speaker 3>the economy. Okay, We've got interest rates which are five percent. Okay,

0:11:40.800 --> 0:11:44.080
<v Speaker 3>if we make the comparison with Jay's idle, mister Volka,

0:11:44.120 --> 0:11:47.120
<v Speaker 3>in the seventies, we had twenty percent interest rates, and

0:11:47.120 --> 0:11:50.320
<v Speaker 3>we had debt which was one time's GDP. We've gone

0:11:50.520 --> 0:11:54.320
<v Speaker 3>back to the future. Effectively, we're at the point where

0:11:54.320 --> 0:11:56.200
<v Speaker 3>the FED was at twenty percent interest rates and it

0:11:56.280 --> 0:11:58.200
<v Speaker 3>was breaking everything in nineteen eighty two.

0:11:58.720 --> 0:12:00.920
<v Speaker 2>Say in nineteen eighty two we had twenty percent rates

0:12:00.920 --> 0:12:02.360
<v Speaker 2>and what was debt to one time?

0:12:02.600 --> 0:12:05.240
<v Speaker 3>Well, one times twenty is twenty, right, and now we're

0:12:05.280 --> 0:12:08.600
<v Speaker 3>at four times debt and we're five five and a quarter, right,

0:12:08.600 --> 0:12:11.679
<v Speaker 3>So we've actually surpassed right where we're all So, Jay,

0:12:11.760 --> 0:12:14.720
<v Speaker 3>you did it? Okay, Now get your ass and get

0:12:14.760 --> 0:12:17.360
<v Speaker 3>those rates down to zero. Other thing's gonna blow up.

0:12:17.360 --> 0:12:19.280
<v Speaker 2>Where do you get four hundred times? Do you four

0:12:19.360 --> 0:12:20.200
<v Speaker 2>hundred percent GDP?

0:12:20.320 --> 0:12:20.720
<v Speaker 7>Where are you?

0:12:20.840 --> 0:12:24.800
<v Speaker 3>Okay? I'm We're like three point six seven or something, right,

0:12:24.800 --> 0:12:26.760
<v Speaker 3>and I'm running up to the neatest destiny point. But

0:12:27.000 --> 0:12:30.920
<v Speaker 3>if you add government debt, household debt, financial debt, industrial dead, you.

0:12:30.840 --> 0:12:33.400
<v Speaker 1>Get yeah, just real quickly, guys come across a Bloomberg terminal,

0:12:33.800 --> 0:12:38.360
<v Speaker 1>another red headline. Western Alliance Moll's options including a potential sale.

0:12:38.600 --> 0:12:41.280
<v Speaker 1>So here we go. Yeah, it's a Financial Times. You

0:12:41.400 --> 0:12:43.000
<v Speaker 1>want to credit the Financial Times.

0:12:43.200 --> 0:12:46.679
<v Speaker 4>I think if we have another major bank failure. J

0:12:46.920 --> 0:12:50.360
<v Speaker 4>Powells can have to his sign and this system cannot

0:12:50.400 --> 0:12:55.080
<v Speaker 4>tolerate that kind of uh, you know, coming to Jesus

0:12:55.080 --> 0:12:57.040
<v Speaker 4>if you will, on the part of an agency like

0:12:57.080 --> 0:12:59.440
<v Speaker 4>the FED, because we depend on them to get it right,

0:13:00.160 --> 0:13:02.640
<v Speaker 4>and when they don't get it right, you know, to

0:13:03.080 --> 0:13:05.600
<v Speaker 4>the earlier comment, what should they have done? They should

0:13:05.640 --> 0:13:07.640
<v Speaker 4>have gotten FED funds up to three and a half

0:13:07.760 --> 0:13:11.280
<v Speaker 4>or four and sold assets. That was the astute thing

0:13:11.360 --> 0:13:14.600
<v Speaker 4>to do given their past policy moves. But instead they're

0:13:14.640 --> 0:13:17.720
<v Speaker 4>pretending it's twenty years ago and they could just raise

0:13:18.320 --> 0:13:20.720
<v Speaker 4>you know, target rates as fast as they want to

0:13:20.760 --> 0:13:24.400
<v Speaker 4>reclaim their credibility, because that's what's really driving this. I

0:13:24.440 --> 0:13:26.720
<v Speaker 4>want a panic of Powell. And then you had the

0:13:26.760 --> 0:13:29.720
<v Speaker 4>fact that they were caught out on inflation and they

0:13:29.760 --> 0:13:33.040
<v Speaker 4>were so embarrassed as an agency that now they've tried

0:13:33.080 --> 0:13:36.199
<v Speaker 4>to regain their credibility in what eighteen.

0:13:35.840 --> 0:13:39.400
<v Speaker 2>Months, right, I want to reset this. Just so listeners understand,

0:13:39.440 --> 0:13:41.800
<v Speaker 2>we're talking to Hugh Henry, who was the founder of Eclectica.

0:13:42.000 --> 0:13:44.240
<v Speaker 2>Now he's a surfer and a hotelier.

0:13:45.320 --> 0:13:48.840
<v Speaker 3>I tweet I'm the Acid and he's.

0:13:48.679 --> 0:13:51.400
<v Speaker 2>On Twitter, and then we're and then we're talking about

0:13:51.440 --> 0:13:55.280
<v Speaker 2>to Chris Whalen, I'm going to say, for me at

0:13:55.360 --> 0:13:59.000
<v Speaker 2>least one of the foremost banking analysts in the country,

0:13:59.760 --> 0:14:04.160
<v Speaker 2>and of course he's also the chairman of Whaling Global Advisors.

0:14:04.200 --> 0:14:07.560
<v Speaker 2>We had yesterday pack West saying they're gonna look at

0:14:07.559 --> 0:14:10.280
<v Speaker 2>strategic options, including the possibility of a sale. Their shares

0:14:10.320 --> 0:14:13.000
<v Speaker 2>now are down more than fifty or fifty percent. Western

0:14:13.040 --> 0:14:15.760
<v Speaker 2>Alliance now is saying it's smalling options, including a potential

0:14:15.840 --> 0:14:18.720
<v Speaker 2>sit sale, and their shares are down about thirty percent.

0:14:19.280 --> 0:14:20.800
<v Speaker 1>Haulted there for Western Alliance.

0:14:20.920 --> 0:14:24.520
<v Speaker 2>I'm I'm good getting goosebumps to some extent because this

0:14:24.560 --> 0:14:26.640
<v Speaker 2>is so scary and so dramatic. But I don't know

0:14:26.680 --> 0:14:28.440
<v Speaker 2>if I'm just not smart enough to push back against

0:14:28.480 --> 0:14:32.160
<v Speaker 2>these two geniuses. Here we have a listener writing in

0:14:32.200 --> 0:14:35.440
<v Speaker 2>and asks of Hugh, do you think any of this

0:14:35.560 --> 0:14:37.280
<v Speaker 2>is imminent? And then he's got a list of three things,

0:14:37.320 --> 0:14:40.720
<v Speaker 2>government intervention, deposit guarantees, or a ban on short sailing.

0:14:41.240 --> 0:14:44.120
<v Speaker 3>Oh Heaven's buns on short selling. Let's bond the truth.

0:14:44.440 --> 0:14:48.120
<v Speaker 2>Let's pretend. I mean, I think is are we in

0:14:48.160 --> 0:14:50.560
<v Speaker 2>a real crisis here? That's about snowball.

0:14:51.160 --> 0:14:53.800
<v Speaker 3>This is wild Coyoto we've gone over the cliff. THEO

0:14:54.080 --> 0:14:57.360
<v Speaker 3>what happened yesterday. The FOMC is no longer relevant. Right,

0:14:57.600 --> 0:15:01.160
<v Speaker 3>policy's too tight. Policy will be like I say, my

0:15:01.200 --> 0:15:04.360
<v Speaker 3>one fear if you're talking about government regulation, government intervention,

0:15:05.200 --> 0:15:07.640
<v Speaker 3>and I don't say it lightly, but I fear that

0:15:07.680 --> 0:15:11.200
<v Speaker 3>they may have to get the deposit base of the

0:15:11.360 --> 0:15:13.200
<v Speaker 3>US within the banking sector.

0:15:13.400 --> 0:15:15.120
<v Speaker 1>I agree, that's Chris.

0:15:15.120 --> 0:15:17.400
<v Speaker 2>Do you really think that that regulators are going to

0:15:17.440 --> 0:15:20.320
<v Speaker 2>put up gates? I mean, that would cause the biggest

0:15:20.360 --> 0:15:22.600
<v Speaker 2>bank run since the nineteen thirties.

0:15:22.600 --> 0:15:26.440
<v Speaker 4>I imagine that's what happens when the central bank injects

0:15:26.520 --> 0:15:30.360
<v Speaker 4>volatility into this system. That's what they have done. You know,

0:15:30.400 --> 0:15:34.600
<v Speaker 4>to Hugh's earlier point, right, you can't move interest rates

0:15:34.640 --> 0:15:37.600
<v Speaker 4>this much when the average coupon in the mortgage space

0:15:37.720 --> 0:15:41.760
<v Speaker 4>is three percent. Everyone listen, solve it, just do the math, right,

0:15:42.040 --> 0:15:45.160
<v Speaker 4>But unfortunately these PhDs that the FED can't do math.

0:15:46.600 --> 0:15:49.880
<v Speaker 1>So but I guess, just my again, I'm not you

0:15:49.960 --> 0:15:52.040
<v Speaker 1>guys are the experts, but their focus, or one of

0:15:52.040 --> 0:15:54.800
<v Speaker 1>their key focus, is to fight inflation. So if the

0:15:54.840 --> 0:15:56.720
<v Speaker 1>only tool they have or one of the main tools

0:15:56.720 --> 0:15:59.600
<v Speaker 1>they have, is raising interest rates, do you suggest that

0:15:59.640 --> 0:16:02.840
<v Speaker 1>they should have stopped at three percent or something like that,

0:16:02.960 --> 0:16:04.040
<v Speaker 1>or they just go to best.

0:16:04.360 --> 0:16:06.400
<v Speaker 3>I want to let me take that one. Let me

0:16:06.440 --> 0:16:09.200
<v Speaker 3>take one, because what we are seeing here is we

0:16:09.320 --> 0:16:13.040
<v Speaker 3>are seeing the crucifixion of the common man on the

0:16:13.120 --> 0:16:17.200
<v Speaker 3>cross of the vanity of JPOW. In twenty twenty, Jpower

0:16:17.320 --> 0:16:22.760
<v Speaker 3>went on US prime television, daytime television and he said, folks,

0:16:22.840 --> 0:16:25.480
<v Speaker 3>we got this. We are we at the Federal Reserve.

0:16:25.640 --> 0:16:29.840
<v Speaker 3>We're printing money. I was like, J, don'll send you

0:16:29.880 --> 0:16:33.880
<v Speaker 3>to prison. You're not allowed. You have no federal sanction

0:16:34.000 --> 0:16:36.760
<v Speaker 3>to print money. What are you doing. But again, the

0:16:37.200 --> 0:16:40.080
<v Speaker 3>Fed business is in the business of camouflage. To see,

0:16:40.120 --> 0:16:42.760
<v Speaker 3>it's in the business of aura. We are all powerful.

0:16:42.840 --> 0:16:44.880
<v Speaker 3>And so it made that comment. And then you get

0:16:44.880 --> 0:16:48.960
<v Speaker 3>this profound supply shop which was COVID right, and prices

0:16:49.000 --> 0:16:52.800
<v Speaker 3>get elevated, and people go, hey, J, you're printing money.

0:16:52.920 --> 0:16:55.760
<v Speaker 3>And now prices are like running double digit and J

0:16:56.080 --> 0:16:59.520
<v Speaker 3>went in to meltdown in terms of the institution and

0:16:59.600 --> 0:17:03.160
<v Speaker 3>the repidity of the rate hikes was to protect and

0:17:03.240 --> 0:17:07.560
<v Speaker 3>safeguard and pull back that comment that they had printed money.

0:17:07.880 --> 0:17:13.440
<v Speaker 3>Inflation I believe is transitory. I'm now with bad deflationary

0:17:13.520 --> 0:17:17.399
<v Speaker 3>money running through the banking sector. I would anticipate that

0:17:17.480 --> 0:17:20.000
<v Speaker 3>we're going to see prices that, hey, this in ninety days.

0:17:20.359 --> 0:17:21.879
<v Speaker 3>CPI is going to be running at three and a

0:17:21.880 --> 0:17:23.680
<v Speaker 3>half percent. By the end of the year, then we're

0:17:23.680 --> 0:17:25.119
<v Speaker 3>going to be close to zero again. We're going to

0:17:25.160 --> 0:17:26.320
<v Speaker 3>be low the Fed's target.

0:17:26.760 --> 0:17:27.879
<v Speaker 2>Chris is terrifying.

0:17:28.160 --> 0:17:31.280
<v Speaker 4>What do you think, Well, no, but to his point,

0:17:31.359 --> 0:17:33.920
<v Speaker 4>if you're a banker right now and you're trying to survive,

0:17:33.960 --> 0:17:36.679
<v Speaker 4>what have you done? You told your loan officers to

0:17:36.720 --> 0:17:39.719
<v Speaker 4>step back and turn it down. So you know, this

0:17:39.800 --> 0:17:42.880
<v Speaker 4>economy is going to slow down because the supplier credit

0:17:43.280 --> 0:17:45.840
<v Speaker 4>from the banking system, from the bond market is going

0:17:45.880 --> 0:17:50.080
<v Speaker 4>to be greatly reduced. Because everybody who's got this problem

0:17:50.160 --> 0:17:52.760
<v Speaker 4>we've been talking about with interest rates, it's got to

0:17:52.840 --> 0:17:55.439
<v Speaker 4>raise cash. Everything is for sale.

0:17:55.760 --> 0:17:56.119
<v Speaker 5>So J.

0:17:56.320 --> 0:17:59.040
<v Speaker 4>Powell has basically put the whole banking industry, and I

0:17:59.119 --> 0:18:01.840
<v Speaker 4>mean big and small banks. Don't think the big guys

0:18:01.840 --> 0:18:04.520
<v Speaker 4>are immune here. They're all for sale now. They're all

0:18:04.560 --> 0:18:07.640
<v Speaker 4>in liquidation mode. And I think the FED is going

0:18:07.680 --> 0:18:10.960
<v Speaker 4>to come out of this greatly weakened. I think you're

0:18:10.960 --> 0:18:14.240
<v Speaker 4>going to see Powell force to resign and then I think, yell,

0:18:14.320 --> 0:18:16.840
<v Speaker 4>and I'll be following them out the door because you.

0:18:16.800 --> 0:18:20.760
<v Speaker 2>Know, Chris, do you believe that's.

0:18:19.640 --> 0:18:20.440
<v Speaker 4>Ceiling this week?

0:18:20.520 --> 0:18:20.680
<v Speaker 8>Right?

0:18:20.960 --> 0:18:21.280
<v Speaker 4>Yeah?

0:18:22.040 --> 0:18:25.040
<v Speaker 2>Well, now we have a tsunami. Before the tsunami, do

0:18:25.119 --> 0:18:28.479
<v Speaker 2>you believe that the that regulators could put up gates

0:18:28.480 --> 0:18:29.200
<v Speaker 2>to deposits?

0:18:29.800 --> 0:18:33.400
<v Speaker 4>Yes, it's inevitable. It's very third world, But here we are.

0:18:33.600 --> 0:18:37.040
<v Speaker 4>You know, we've got to start practicing, practicing our Portuguese.

0:18:37.640 --> 0:18:40.000
<v Speaker 4>I really think, you know, I worked in the emerging

0:18:40.040 --> 0:18:42.480
<v Speaker 4>markets years ago, and it is scary to me watching

0:18:42.520 --> 0:18:45.720
<v Speaker 4>this because it's like deja voo. And it's not just

0:18:45.760 --> 0:18:48.919
<v Speaker 4>Wiley coyote. I think that's very clear. But it is

0:18:48.960 --> 0:18:53.240
<v Speaker 4>the hubris and the personal convenience of J. Powell and

0:18:53.280 --> 0:18:55.479
<v Speaker 4>the other members of the FED board that we're seeing.

0:18:55.680 --> 0:18:58.879
<v Speaker 4>They're not acting in the public interest right now. They're

0:18:58.880 --> 0:19:01.280
<v Speaker 4>covering their ass because they don't want to admit they

0:19:01.280 --> 0:19:02.000
<v Speaker 4>made a mistake.

0:19:02.520 --> 0:19:04.879
<v Speaker 1>But let me ask a question, Chris, me just go

0:19:04.880 --> 0:19:07.359
<v Speaker 1>to your real quickly. The money comes out of the banks,

0:19:07.720 --> 0:19:09.720
<v Speaker 1>don't I just put it into money market funds? Isn't

0:19:09.720 --> 0:19:11.440
<v Speaker 1>the cash still in the system.

0:19:11.720 --> 0:19:13.560
<v Speaker 4>Because in the T bills at five percent?

0:19:13.720 --> 0:19:15.880
<v Speaker 1>Right, So it's still there. It's not like I put

0:19:15.880 --> 0:19:16.680
<v Speaker 1>it under my mattress.

0:19:16.760 --> 0:19:18.440
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, but is in there?

0:19:18.600 --> 0:19:18.800
<v Speaker 6>Right?

0:19:18.960 --> 0:19:21.080
<v Speaker 3>You know, you have to let me take this, Chris.

0:19:21.280 --> 0:19:25.080
<v Speaker 3>The you when you pooh the deposits out of the

0:19:25.119 --> 0:19:28.159
<v Speaker 3>banking sector, they've then got to sell assets, right, What

0:19:28.200 --> 0:19:31.600
<v Speaker 3>are their assets? Well, their assets are loans to the bank.

0:19:31.600 --> 0:19:33.040
<v Speaker 1>Accounting thing is very difficult.

0:19:34.119 --> 0:19:38.200
<v Speaker 3>Money. Money is complicated. It is easy to spend, difficult

0:19:38.240 --> 0:19:39.000
<v Speaker 3>to decipher.

0:19:39.520 --> 0:19:40.960
<v Speaker 1>All right, Chris, what are what are some of the

0:19:41.000 --> 0:19:43.800
<v Speaker 1>next steps you're looking for in the evolution of what

0:19:43.800 --> 0:19:46.119
<v Speaker 1>we're seeing out there or what should we be on

0:19:46.160 --> 0:19:46.760
<v Speaker 1>the lookout for.

0:19:47.480 --> 0:19:50.520
<v Speaker 4>I think the FED needs to come forward and offer

0:19:50.600 --> 0:19:53.600
<v Speaker 4>to finance all of these legacy assets that the banks

0:19:53.640 --> 0:19:57.080
<v Speaker 4>have a problem with at par at whatever the coup

0:19:57.119 --> 0:19:59.560
<v Speaker 4>pund rate is. So, if I have a gy may two,

0:20:00.040 --> 0:20:05.000
<v Speaker 4>defense should charge me two indefinitely until rates fall. That's

0:20:05.040 --> 0:20:06.480
<v Speaker 4>how you take this off the table.

0:20:06.640 --> 0:20:09.199
<v Speaker 1>All right. So, but but we've had some of the

0:20:09.200 --> 0:20:12.120
<v Speaker 1>bank's regional banks report and most of them are saying

0:20:12.160 --> 0:20:12.760
<v Speaker 1>don't worry.

0:20:13.240 --> 0:20:14.960
<v Speaker 2>I mean, well they have to say that, right, but

0:20:14.960 --> 0:20:17.480
<v Speaker 2>they can't say freak out. But there's everyone panic.

0:20:17.600 --> 0:20:21.680
<v Speaker 1>Look at our balance sheet, look at our stuff work okay, hughe,

0:20:21.720 --> 0:20:23.560
<v Speaker 1>I mean, do we not take them at their word?

0:20:23.600 --> 0:20:23.960
<v Speaker 3>I guess?

0:20:24.040 --> 0:20:26.919
<v Speaker 1>Or is it or is the problem too big for

0:20:26.960 --> 0:20:28.120
<v Speaker 1>an individual bank per se?

0:20:28.160 --> 0:20:30.160
<v Speaker 2>But do you have any bank deposits in the US?

0:20:30.240 --> 0:20:35.080
<v Speaker 3>Hugh, No, I don't. I'm in a very fortunate position.

0:20:35.119 --> 0:20:39.159
<v Speaker 3>But I owe the banks a lot of money. I

0:20:39.320 --> 0:20:41.960
<v Speaker 3>recommend that, in fact, to everyone, I'd recommend your panic.

0:20:42.119 --> 0:20:43.679
<v Speaker 3>I mean, this is a good time to panic.

0:20:43.720 --> 0:20:47.040
<v Speaker 2>Do you recommend gold? Do you like bitcoin? I?

0:20:47.600 --> 0:20:51.520
<v Speaker 3>So gold has a logic, okay, But when we look

0:20:51.560 --> 0:20:54.600
<v Speaker 3>at that kind of Bell curve of distribution of where

0:20:54.640 --> 0:20:57.679
<v Speaker 3>we are on distribution of returns, like gold presently is

0:20:57.840 --> 0:21:01.399
<v Speaker 3>a little bit too far on the right axis in

0:21:01.480 --> 0:21:04.320
<v Speaker 3>terms of like it's kind of rich, it could be richer.

0:21:04.600 --> 0:21:07.679
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, twenty fifty four, we're almost at the all time

0:21:07.720 --> 0:21:08.439
<v Speaker 2>You know what I like?

0:21:08.600 --> 0:21:11.240
<v Speaker 3>Well, I like the Bell curve. I like when it's

0:21:11.320 --> 0:21:14.960
<v Speaker 3>hitting the x axes at zero on the left hand side,

0:21:15.000 --> 0:21:17.600
<v Speaker 3>which is to say, you're like two three standard deviations

0:21:17.680 --> 0:21:19.800
<v Speaker 3>below the price norm over the last forty years.

0:21:20.000 --> 0:21:20.119
<v Speaker 6>Right.

0:21:20.320 --> 0:21:23.199
<v Speaker 3>Welcome to the world of the ultra long treasury, the

0:21:23.359 --> 0:21:27.280
<v Speaker 3>most despised security because we got the ballgame ount of

0:21:27.280 --> 0:21:31.400
<v Speaker 3>inflation right. So the TLT, the ETF has halfed right,

0:21:31.400 --> 0:21:33.560
<v Speaker 3>one hundred and eighty to ninety today it's one hundred.

0:21:33.760 --> 0:21:36.040
<v Speaker 3>I think that's an easy moonshot back to one hundred

0:21:36.040 --> 0:21:37.080
<v Speaker 3>and forty hundred and fifty.

0:21:37.480 --> 0:21:37.800
<v Speaker 1>Wow.

0:21:38.320 --> 0:21:42.439
<v Speaker 2>Wow, take a long long duration treasuries TLT. Chris, what

0:21:42.480 --> 0:21:44.399
<v Speaker 2>do you think, I mean, where would you put your

0:21:44.440 --> 0:21:45.160
<v Speaker 2>money right now?

0:21:46.480 --> 0:21:46.640
<v Speaker 5>Well?

0:21:46.640 --> 0:21:49.040
<v Speaker 4>I think you is right. It's hard to argue with

0:21:49.080 --> 0:21:51.720
<v Speaker 4>the treasury. I mean, my god, why wouldn't you be.

0:21:51.920 --> 0:21:54.080
<v Speaker 2>Everybody's at the short end of the curve, right, I mean,

0:21:54.160 --> 0:21:56.119
<v Speaker 2>hence the price. Yeah, but the head.

0:21:57.520 --> 0:21:59.800
<v Speaker 3>It's a function of let like so it's like with duration.

0:22:00.119 --> 0:22:01.920
<v Speaker 3>So if you've got a drug dealer storry I meant

0:22:01.920 --> 0:22:04.160
<v Speaker 3>to say, is their contract with a prime broker?

0:22:04.480 --> 0:22:04.640
<v Speaker 9>Right?

0:22:04.640 --> 0:22:07.360
<v Speaker 3>Then you get but mountains of leverage and you can

0:22:07.400 --> 0:22:09.640
<v Speaker 3>own two year. But if you've got an ny view

0:22:09.680 --> 0:22:12.719
<v Speaker 3>of a billion dollars, you might have one hundred billion

0:22:12.760 --> 0:22:15.320
<v Speaker 3>dollars in the two year and you'll make money. When

0:22:15.480 --> 0:22:18.640
<v Speaker 3>in the ordinary world we own the t LT, you've

0:22:18.640 --> 0:22:21.639
<v Speaker 3>got to own duration to get the to sup up

0:22:21.640 --> 0:22:23.760
<v Speaker 3>your returns for the retail invest So that's how that

0:22:23.760 --> 0:22:24.760
<v Speaker 3>that equation works.

0:22:25.119 --> 0:22:26.879
<v Speaker 1>All right, We're gonna let Hugh gosse you have some

0:22:26.960 --> 0:22:30.320
<v Speaker 1>TV coming up, so well you appreciate the time with Hugh.

0:22:30.359 --> 0:22:31.399
<v Speaker 1>We're gonna kick you out now.

0:22:31.440 --> 0:22:33.360
<v Speaker 2>I just want to quickly ask, I see at Hugh

0:22:33.720 --> 0:22:37.320
<v Speaker 2>under at Henry Underscore Hugh for your for your Twitter darling,

0:22:37.359 --> 0:22:40.359
<v Speaker 2>I love you, Yeah, okay. At Henry Underscore Hugh is

0:22:40.400 --> 0:22:45.520
<v Speaker 2>where you find Hugh Henry of course the founder of Eclectica.

0:22:46.119 --> 0:22:51.479
<v Speaker 2>And as I said, uh, surfer, Chris Whalen, what what

0:22:51.480 --> 0:22:52.879
<v Speaker 2>what do you think? What do you think we need

0:22:52.920 --> 0:22:56.120
<v Speaker 2>to be watching today? What where should I be faced

0:22:56.359 --> 0:23:00.760
<v Speaker 2>at kr E? Should I be looking at you know, rates?

0:23:00.800 --> 0:23:03.560
<v Speaker 2>Should I be looking at stocks? What's the most important

0:23:03.560 --> 0:23:04.359
<v Speaker 2>thing to follow?

0:23:05.359 --> 0:23:07.359
<v Speaker 4>Well, I think you're looking at long rates for the

0:23:07.440 --> 0:23:10.879
<v Speaker 4>flight to quality. I also think that there's gonna be

0:23:11.040 --> 0:23:14.320
<v Speaker 4>enormous pressure on short term rates in terms of buyers

0:23:14.640 --> 0:23:16.960
<v Speaker 4>because they're going to be running out of risk assets.

0:23:18.560 --> 0:23:21.800
<v Speaker 4>You know, the US is playing with fire. I think

0:23:21.800 --> 0:23:24.760
<v Speaker 4>we're going to see dollar swaps flip back to a

0:23:24.800 --> 0:23:28.520
<v Speaker 4>positive premium. They've been negative since it's a great financial crisis.

0:23:29.000 --> 0:23:30.600
<v Speaker 4>And then I think this is going to start to

0:23:30.640 --> 0:23:33.040
<v Speaker 4>weigh on the dollar and on the US financial system.

0:23:33.280 --> 0:23:35.959
<v Speaker 4>Because we're demonstrating the people that we don't know what

0:23:36.000 --> 0:23:39.560
<v Speaker 4>we're doing. You know, when the Fed chairman tells everybody

0:23:39.560 --> 0:23:42.040
<v Speaker 4>banks are fine and then you see the market going

0:23:42.080 --> 0:23:45.399
<v Speaker 4>the other way, that's not a good picture. And I

0:23:45.440 --> 0:23:49.080
<v Speaker 4>think it raises questions of credibility to go to the

0:23:49.080 --> 0:23:51.120
<v Speaker 4>top of the government. So you know, the president has

0:23:51.119 --> 0:23:53.640
<v Speaker 4>a problem. I think he needs to make some changes

0:23:53.680 --> 0:23:54.959
<v Speaker 4>in his team very quickly.

0:23:55.280 --> 0:23:57.000
<v Speaker 1>Well, that's right where I was going to go, Chris.

0:23:57.400 --> 0:24:01.520
<v Speaker 1>This has not made the pages of the local papers.

0:24:01.600 --> 0:24:03.440
<v Speaker 1>I mean, unless you're happen to be in a town

0:24:03.480 --> 0:24:08.640
<v Speaker 1>with and I've heard nothing from Washington really, from Congress

0:24:08.680 --> 0:24:11.760
<v Speaker 1>or the administration really about this issue.

0:24:12.280 --> 0:24:15.959
<v Speaker 4>Well, I've been hearing from career staff. Okay not the

0:24:15.960 --> 0:24:18.880
<v Speaker 4>political staff, but the career people. And most of these

0:24:18.920 --> 0:24:23.240
<v Speaker 4>agencies are deeply concerned and they're moving, but there's only

0:24:23.280 --> 0:24:26.760
<v Speaker 4>so much they can do. They execute government policy, they

0:24:26.840 --> 0:24:30.560
<v Speaker 4>don't make policy. So you know, right now, the government,

0:24:30.760 --> 0:24:33.440
<v Speaker 4>I think, unfortunately, is a very we can't I work

0:24:33.480 --> 0:24:36.000
<v Speaker 4>in the mortgage business. I deal with most of these

0:24:36.040 --> 0:24:39.639
<v Speaker 4>agencies in Washington, and they really don't have people that

0:24:39.760 --> 0:24:45.920
<v Speaker 4>are financial professionals. They have politicians mostly, so I think

0:24:45.960 --> 0:24:50.160
<v Speaker 4>we have an issue. You know, Washington wants to continue

0:24:50.200 --> 0:24:53.879
<v Speaker 4>to pretend that we can just fight inflation in a

0:24:53.960 --> 0:24:58.120
<v Speaker 4>very traditional sort of way without the implications for financial

0:24:58.160 --> 0:25:00.000
<v Speaker 4>stability that are clearly in our face.

0:25:00.240 --> 0:25:02.679
<v Speaker 2>Well, Hughes says we're headed for deflation by you know,

0:25:02.800 --> 0:25:03.240
<v Speaker 2>a year end.

0:25:03.320 --> 0:25:06.359
<v Speaker 4>I agree with him. I agree with him because look again,

0:25:06.760 --> 0:25:10.040
<v Speaker 4>if the bankers are stepping back to raise cash, what

0:25:10.080 --> 0:25:12.399
<v Speaker 4>does that mean. That means they're going to cut people

0:25:12.440 --> 0:25:15.520
<v Speaker 4>off from credit and that leads to default. I think

0:25:15.600 --> 0:25:18.120
<v Speaker 4>by third quarter, credit is going to be the headline, Matt,

0:25:18.720 --> 0:25:20.240
<v Speaker 4>you and I are going to be sitting here talking

0:25:20.240 --> 0:25:20.840
<v Speaker 4>about credit.

0:25:21.200 --> 0:25:23.240
<v Speaker 1>All right, All right, Chris, thank you so much for

0:25:23.320 --> 0:25:25.800
<v Speaker 1>joining us. Really appreciate getting some of your time and

0:25:25.800 --> 0:25:29.920
<v Speaker 1>getting your formed opinion. Chris Whalen, chairman of Whalen Global Advisors,

0:25:30.320 --> 0:25:33.880
<v Speaker 1>along with Hugh Henry from Eclectica Asset Management. What an

0:25:34.000 --> 0:25:38.200
<v Speaker 1>incredible roundtable, Matt, of just getting these quite frankly very

0:25:38.280 --> 0:25:40.480
<v Speaker 1>dire views of kind of some of the risks in

0:25:40.520 --> 0:25:41.160
<v Speaker 1>the financial sys.

0:25:41.160 --> 0:25:42.920
<v Speaker 2>It's really freaking me out. I think we need to

0:25:42.920 --> 0:25:46.320
<v Speaker 2>talk to some optimistic bolts. I know, because I'm terriff.

0:25:46.400 --> 0:25:48.560
<v Speaker 2>I'm running home, right now sell the house, sell the car,

0:25:48.640 --> 0:25:50.000
<v Speaker 2>sell the kids, and yep, we'll see.

0:25:50.000 --> 0:25:51.200
<v Speaker 1>All right, let's say down to Washington.

0:25:54.119 --> 0:25:57.480
<v Speaker 6>You're listening to the team Ken's Are Live program, Bloomberg

0:25:57.560 --> 0:26:00.959
<v Speaker 6>Markets weekdays at ten am East Darren con Burg dot Com,

0:26:01.000 --> 0:26:04.160
<v Speaker 6>the iHeartRadio app and the Blowberg Business app, or listen

0:26:04.240 --> 0:26:06.320
<v Speaker 6>on demand wherever you get your podcasts.

0:26:08.200 --> 0:26:10.040
<v Speaker 1>All right, let's flip it. Maybe we can get a

0:26:10.080 --> 0:26:13.040
<v Speaker 1>different perspective. I'm not sure, but we've certainly got somebody

0:26:13.040 --> 0:26:16.080
<v Speaker 1>here who has a learned perspective, Doctor Richard Portus. He's

0:26:16.119 --> 0:26:18.120
<v Speaker 1>a professor at the London Business School, but that does

0:26:18.160 --> 0:26:22.920
<v Speaker 1>not begin to explain kind of his background, his experience,

0:26:22.920 --> 0:26:24.760
<v Speaker 1>because the CV just goes on and on and on,

0:26:25.000 --> 0:26:27.679
<v Speaker 1>undergraduate of elphd at Oxford, all the other kind of

0:26:27.720 --> 0:26:30.199
<v Speaker 1>stuff that goes on there. I'm looking for perspective, and

0:26:30.200 --> 0:26:32.280
<v Speaker 1>that's why we asked doctor Porters to join us here.

0:26:32.600 --> 0:26:34.320
<v Speaker 1>He's based in London, buddy, joining us here in our

0:26:34.320 --> 0:26:38.400
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg studio here. So we appreciate that, Doctor Porters, thanks

0:26:38.400 --> 0:26:41.840
<v Speaker 1>so much for coming in. How concerned should investors be

0:26:42.080 --> 0:26:43.919
<v Speaker 1>about the US banking system?

0:26:44.119 --> 0:26:46.680
<v Speaker 5>I think very concerned. I certainly wouldn't want to be

0:26:46.720 --> 0:26:50.520
<v Speaker 5>holding shares in any of the mid sized banks, any

0:26:50.600 --> 0:26:52.840
<v Speaker 5>of the midsize banks, but certainly not those that have

0:26:53.440 --> 0:26:59.760
<v Speaker 5>profiles that look anything like First Republic or Silicon Valley

0:26:59.840 --> 0:27:04.879
<v Speaker 5>or whatever that is to say, specialized, specialized, clontel I

0:27:05.040 --> 0:27:08.680
<v Speaker 5>net Worth maybe whatever. Okay, you just don't want to

0:27:08.720 --> 0:27:11.040
<v Speaker 5>be concentrated in that way, and you don't want to

0:27:11.040 --> 0:27:15.080
<v Speaker 5>be sensitive to deposit runs. That's what we call the

0:27:15.080 --> 0:27:20.000
<v Speaker 5>deposit beta, right, Okay, how much how much deposits will

0:27:20.000 --> 0:27:22.920
<v Speaker 5>move out in response to an interest rate differential that

0:27:22.960 --> 0:27:27.040
<v Speaker 5>you can get elsewhere, And what we saw with what

0:27:27.040 --> 0:27:29.080
<v Speaker 5>we've seen in a number of these cases is precisely that.

0:27:30.119 --> 0:27:33.240
<v Speaker 2>So what is the answer to stop this? You know,

0:27:33.280 --> 0:27:35.360
<v Speaker 2>it seemed like we had it in the rear view

0:27:35.400 --> 0:27:37.840
<v Speaker 2>mirror when Jamie Diamond and JP Morgan came in and

0:27:37.880 --> 0:27:41.080
<v Speaker 2>bought First Republic, or at least that was you know,

0:27:41.119 --> 0:27:44.280
<v Speaker 2>at the Milken conference, that was the general feeling that

0:27:44.800 --> 0:27:48.880
<v Speaker 2>fears had been calmed. Now, you know, the concerns are

0:27:48.920 --> 0:27:53.159
<v Speaker 2>front and center again, and the Federal Reserve grays rates

0:27:53.240 --> 0:27:56.440
<v Speaker 2>even further, which seems to be the crux of the problem.

0:27:56.840 --> 0:27:58.879
<v Speaker 5>It is the crux of the problem, but that's because

0:27:59.040 --> 0:28:02.200
<v Speaker 5>rates were nominal rates were low for a very long

0:28:02.240 --> 0:28:05.080
<v Speaker 5>period of time. People took risks they shouldn't have taken.

0:28:05.119 --> 0:28:10.320
<v Speaker 5>They accumulated portfolios that were very long duration, and that's

0:28:10.400 --> 0:28:15.080
<v Speaker 5>coming home to roost. So it's very straightforward and it

0:28:15.119 --> 0:28:19.560
<v Speaker 5>should have been expected. Supervisors should have been much more

0:28:20.240 --> 0:28:24.640
<v Speaker 5>vigorous in their investigations of the various of these banks.

0:28:25.119 --> 0:28:28.240
<v Speaker 5>But where we are, where we are, and you know,

0:28:29.640 --> 0:28:33.000
<v Speaker 5>it made me think today. The Westpac story made me

0:28:33.080 --> 0:28:35.159
<v Speaker 5>think of the of the line about you know, how

0:28:35.240 --> 0:28:38.800
<v Speaker 5>does a bank stock come down by ninety percent? The

0:28:38.880 --> 0:28:41.040
<v Speaker 5>answer is that comes down by eighty percent the first

0:28:41.080 --> 0:28:42.440
<v Speaker 5>day and fifty percent the next day.

0:28:42.520 --> 0:28:43.160
<v Speaker 1>Oh good point.

0:28:43.240 --> 0:28:44.880
<v Speaker 2>Right, that's the myth and.

0:28:45.480 --> 0:28:50.680
<v Speaker 5>That's what's happening. And they can't survive like that. So

0:28:51.760 --> 0:28:55.400
<v Speaker 5>we will see more failures whatever you want to have

0:28:55.400 --> 0:28:55.880
<v Speaker 5>to call them.

0:28:55.920 --> 0:28:57.680
<v Speaker 1>But I had my foot of reserve yesterday. Tell me

0:28:57.680 --> 0:29:00.720
<v Speaker 1>there's not a problem with the banking system sound and resilient.

0:29:00.920 --> 0:29:05.080
<v Speaker 5>Yeah, you know, I've heard that one, that resilient line before.

0:29:05.200 --> 0:29:09.040
<v Speaker 5>When the chair of the Financial Stability Board in twenty seventeen,

0:29:09.400 --> 0:29:11.560
<v Speaker 5>Mark Kinnie, then the Governor of the Bank of England,

0:29:11.880 --> 0:29:15.440
<v Speaker 5>said we've now created a market based financial system that

0:29:15.600 --> 0:29:20.840
<v Speaker 5>is resilient. Right three years later March twenty twenty wasn't

0:29:20.840 --> 0:29:26.200
<v Speaker 5>resilient at all. And the answer is that that there

0:29:26.200 --> 0:29:29.400
<v Speaker 5>are some contingencies you can't provide for yep. But also

0:29:29.840 --> 0:29:33.880
<v Speaker 5>there are structural structural weaknesses, and you have to you

0:29:33.960 --> 0:29:34.560
<v Speaker 5>have to try.

0:29:34.440 --> 0:29:37.560
<v Speaker 2>To deal with those in the short term. How do

0:29:37.640 --> 0:29:39.520
<v Speaker 2>they deal with that? Do we see some kind of

0:29:39.600 --> 0:29:43.800
<v Speaker 2>government or regulatory intervention. Do we see deposit guarantees? Do

0:29:43.840 --> 0:29:47.920
<v Speaker 2>we see a ban on short selling? It seems archaic,

0:29:47.960 --> 0:29:49.040
<v Speaker 2>but you know, the.

0:29:49.160 --> 0:29:54.200
<v Speaker 5>Ban on short selling won't do you much good. The

0:29:54.240 --> 0:29:58.200
<v Speaker 5>suggestion that you might stop deposits from running. That won't do.

0:29:58.880 --> 0:29:59.600
<v Speaker 5>That just won't pass.

0:29:59.640 --> 0:30:01.760
<v Speaker 2>Putting up gates is what our last two guys said

0:30:01.800 --> 0:30:03.400
<v Speaker 2>was a possibility that will pass politically.

0:30:03.440 --> 0:30:05.719
<v Speaker 5>It's completely out of the question. I mean, you can

0:30:05.760 --> 0:30:08.640
<v Speaker 5>put up gates on a real estate an open end

0:30:08.680 --> 0:30:11.240
<v Speaker 5>real estate fund if there starts to be a run

0:30:11.280 --> 0:30:13.880
<v Speaker 5>on that, that makes sense, okay, And they can then

0:30:13.920 --> 0:30:16.640
<v Speaker 5>consolidate their position, liquidate some of their assets, and so

0:30:16.680 --> 0:30:19.640
<v Speaker 5>forth in a reasonable time. But you can't put a

0:30:19.720 --> 0:30:21.600
<v Speaker 5>gate on the positives. Come on, give me a break.

0:30:22.120 --> 0:30:23.880
<v Speaker 5>It's not gonna it's not gonna happen.

0:30:23.840 --> 0:30:25.200
<v Speaker 1>Right, Okay, that's the political stage.

0:30:25.280 --> 0:30:27.080
<v Speaker 2>They did, it would be the last thing they ever did.

0:30:27.120 --> 0:30:30.360
<v Speaker 5>If they did, it would be the last time anybody

0:30:30.400 --> 0:30:31.360
<v Speaker 5>put their money in a bank.

0:30:31.560 --> 0:30:34.880
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, yeah, that's right. Doctor Portershyer based in London at

0:30:34.880 --> 0:30:37.760
<v Speaker 1>the London School of Business. We heard from the ECB

0:30:37.960 --> 0:30:41.640
<v Speaker 1>today raising rates again. What's your view on the ECB

0:30:41.840 --> 0:30:43.440
<v Speaker 1>and kind of what they're trying to do with the

0:30:43.480 --> 0:30:44.480
<v Speaker 1>economy in Europe.

0:30:44.800 --> 0:30:47.320
<v Speaker 5>I think the general mood of the ECB is this

0:30:47.480 --> 0:30:51.680
<v Speaker 5>was a hawkish twenty five b raises point rise in

0:30:51.760 --> 0:30:55.240
<v Speaker 5>the sense that the President announced that she didn't expect

0:30:55.240 --> 0:30:57.240
<v Speaker 5>this to be the end, and I think that's probably

0:30:57.240 --> 0:31:00.600
<v Speaker 5>what we're going to see. Unless something thrown out happens,

0:31:01.160 --> 0:31:04.320
<v Speaker 5>We're going to see more twenty five basis point rises

0:31:04.880 --> 0:31:08.760
<v Speaker 5>up until the autumn. Probably my view they'll peak at

0:31:08.800 --> 0:31:14.280
<v Speaker 5>four four percent, but that's a sort of consensus few

0:31:14.280 --> 0:31:18.880
<v Speaker 5>there's no news there. I think they're wrong in the

0:31:18.920 --> 0:31:22.200
<v Speaker 5>sense that I think they should have paused. There is

0:31:22.240 --> 0:31:25.400
<v Speaker 5>a credit crunch developing as it is here, by the way,

0:31:25.760 --> 0:31:28.000
<v Speaker 5>for small and medium sized enterprises, it's going to be

0:31:28.160 --> 0:31:32.760
<v Speaker 5>very tough with the consumers, and yeah, and consumers too, absolutely,

0:31:33.840 --> 0:31:37.760
<v Speaker 5>but I'm worried about I'm worried about firms that won't

0:31:37.800 --> 0:31:40.600
<v Speaker 5>have access to credit. They and that's just you know,

0:31:41.120 --> 0:31:45.000
<v Speaker 5>that is a big thing in Europe. You know, the system,

0:31:45.600 --> 0:31:49.600
<v Speaker 5>the system is much more bank dependent in Europe than

0:31:49.600 --> 0:31:53.560
<v Speaker 5>it is in the United States, and that's where financing

0:31:53.600 --> 0:31:56.200
<v Speaker 5>comes from for the most part, and it's not going

0:31:56.280 --> 0:31:57.360
<v Speaker 5>to come. It's not coming.

0:31:57.880 --> 0:31:59.760
<v Speaker 2>I just had to jump in here with a quick

0:31:59.800 --> 0:32:03.360
<v Speaker 2>head line because we told our listeners earlier that Western

0:32:03.360 --> 0:32:08.160
<v Speaker 2>Alliance is mauling options, strategic options, including a potential sale

0:32:08.240 --> 0:32:12.320
<v Speaker 2>that came from the Financial Times. Western Alliance itself comes

0:32:12.360 --> 0:32:16.160
<v Speaker 2>out and says the report of deal talks is absolutely.

0:32:16.920 --> 0:32:17.320
<v Speaker 1>False.

0:32:17.840 --> 0:32:22.080
<v Speaker 2>So you know, this is the Financial Times reporting, Western

0:32:22.080 --> 0:32:26.880
<v Speaker 2>Alliance is denying it. Nonetheless, we do see shares of

0:32:26.960 --> 0:32:32.560
<v Speaker 2>Western Alliance down right now sixty one percent, so and

0:32:32.600 --> 0:32:35.760
<v Speaker 2>then of course they're halted, so you know, this is

0:32:36.040 --> 0:32:39.120
<v Speaker 2>absolute free fall. They've already done the eighty percent drop

0:32:39.160 --> 0:32:41.120
<v Speaker 2>that you talked about in the fifty percent drop.

0:32:40.920 --> 0:32:41.000
<v Speaker 9>And.

0:32:43.240 --> 0:32:48.360
<v Speaker 2>They have come down. Western Alliance shares have well eighty

0:32:48.440 --> 0:32:51.040
<v Speaker 2>one percent so far this year to date. But we're watching.

0:32:51.080 --> 0:32:54.480
<v Speaker 2>Of course. Pack West as well reports yesterday that pack

0:32:54.560 --> 0:32:58.640
<v Speaker 2>West is looking for strategic options. They're down eighty eight

0:32:58.680 --> 0:32:59.600
<v Speaker 2>percent year to date.

0:33:00.080 --> 0:33:03.920
<v Speaker 5>Outfits are dead men walking, Oh right, all right, and

0:33:04.680 --> 0:33:07.160
<v Speaker 5>that's there are going to be several of them. I

0:33:07.160 --> 0:33:10.760
<v Speaker 5>would not want to count, right, but that's where we.

0:33:10.720 --> 0:33:13.000
<v Speaker 1>Are, all right. Doctor Richard Porters, thank you so much

0:33:13.040 --> 0:33:14.960
<v Speaker 1>for joining us. We really appreciate you taking the time

0:33:15.120 --> 0:33:18.160
<v Speaker 1>coming into our students studio, Doctor Richard Porters. He's a

0:33:18.160 --> 0:33:21.160
<v Speaker 1>professor at the London Business School, giving us some of

0:33:21.200 --> 0:33:23.280
<v Speaker 1>his perspective and wisdom on kind of what we're seeing

0:33:23.280 --> 0:33:24.400
<v Speaker 1>out there in the economy.

0:33:24.720 --> 0:33:27.840
<v Speaker 6>You're listening to the tape Cat's are live program Bloomberg

0:33:27.880 --> 0:33:31.480
<v Speaker 6>Markets weekdays at ten am Eastern on Bloomberg Radio, the

0:33:31.560 --> 0:33:34.760
<v Speaker 6>tune in app, Bloomberg dot Com, and the Bloomberg Business App.

0:33:34.800 --> 0:33:37.640
<v Speaker 6>You can also listen live on Amazon Alexa from our

0:33:37.640 --> 0:33:42.720
<v Speaker 6>flagship New York station, Just say Alexa play Bloomberg eleven thirty.

0:33:44.440 --> 0:33:47.000
<v Speaker 1>This segment's called Don't Fight the Fit. Barry Ridols, founder

0:33:47.000 --> 0:33:49.760
<v Speaker 1>of Bertholts Wealth Management and host of Masters in Business,

0:33:50.560 --> 0:33:53.040
<v Speaker 1>joins us here on the access line, and Danielle di

0:33:53.200 --> 0:33:57.400
<v Speaker 1>Martino Booth CEO and chief strategists at QI joins us

0:33:57.440 --> 0:33:59.520
<v Speaker 1>in studio. We're gonna have an extended kind of couple

0:33:59.560 --> 0:34:02.520
<v Speaker 1>blocks toscussion with these two very smart people. And Daniel,

0:34:02.560 --> 0:34:05.040
<v Speaker 1>let's start with you here. Matt and I just had

0:34:05.240 --> 0:34:07.960
<v Speaker 1>you know, we were scared to death about it. Forty

0:34:08.000 --> 0:34:09.839
<v Speaker 1>five minutes ago. We had it a panel of folks

0:34:09.880 --> 0:34:13.840
<v Speaker 1>saying this banking crisis is bad. It's like nineteen thirty.

0:34:14.000 --> 0:34:16.040
<v Speaker 2>Surely you met Hugh Henry in the green room, because

0:34:16.040 --> 0:34:17.160
<v Speaker 2>I saw you were both in there.

0:34:17.280 --> 0:34:22.080
<v Speaker 10>Yes, I did recently yesterday I think he postponed an

0:34:22.120 --> 0:34:23.800
<v Speaker 10>interview with me. He said, I think I need another

0:34:23.840 --> 0:34:24.440
<v Speaker 10>week to prepare.

0:34:24.719 --> 0:34:28.480
<v Speaker 1>Okay, So what's your feeling here just about the banking

0:34:28.520 --> 0:34:31.440
<v Speaker 1>system out there? And is a FED contributing to some

0:34:31.480 --> 0:34:34.480
<v Speaker 1>of this stress there? How all importance to you?

0:34:34.640 --> 0:34:36.840
<v Speaker 10>So I certainly think that the FED, that the Fed's

0:34:36.840 --> 0:34:41.080
<v Speaker 10>aggressive policies have obviously made quite the mark, if not,

0:34:41.239 --> 0:34:44.520
<v Speaker 10>if not a scar. But that being said, you know,

0:34:44.640 --> 0:34:47.040
<v Speaker 10>I was looking back at FED rate hikes, but by

0:34:47.080 --> 0:34:49.640
<v Speaker 10>the time we got to June July twenty twenty two,

0:34:50.200 --> 0:34:52.560
<v Speaker 10>I think the market should have ordered the banks at

0:34:52.600 --> 0:34:54.320
<v Speaker 10>least should have figured out that j.

0:34:54.480 --> 0:34:55.400
<v Speaker 11>Powell was serious.

0:34:56.360 --> 0:34:57.920
<v Speaker 10>You know, the day that he was confirmed by the

0:34:58.000 --> 0:35:01.720
<v Speaker 10>US Senate May the twelfth, twenty two, after being basically

0:35:01.760 --> 0:35:05.160
<v Speaker 10>an a holding puner for six months. After being renominated,

0:35:05.200 --> 0:35:08.160
<v Speaker 10>he went on NPR's marketplace and he did an interview

0:35:08.200 --> 0:35:10.480
<v Speaker 10>and he said, inflation is now my number one target.

0:35:10.480 --> 0:35:12.520
<v Speaker 10>We have to get it down to two percent period.

0:35:12.520 --> 0:35:16.000
<v Speaker 10>And he changed his tune that day. He has not

0:35:16.320 --> 0:35:20.399
<v Speaker 10>deviated and it's been almost a full year. So there's

0:35:20.440 --> 0:35:22.880
<v Speaker 10>an argument to be made that there was time to

0:35:22.960 --> 0:35:25.839
<v Speaker 10>prepare because by then he was lobbing out seventy five

0:35:25.840 --> 0:35:26.880
<v Speaker 10>basis point rate hikes.

0:35:27.160 --> 0:35:31.560
<v Speaker 2>Fair enough, they should have prepared. But in the absence

0:35:31.640 --> 0:35:35.880
<v Speaker 2>of action from bank managers, don't they have regulators that

0:35:35.960 --> 0:35:38.680
<v Speaker 2>are there to force them. I mean, what was Mary

0:35:38.760 --> 0:35:40.120
<v Speaker 2>Daily doing all this time?

0:35:40.239 --> 0:35:40.399
<v Speaker 5>Well?

0:35:40.400 --> 0:35:43.160
<v Speaker 11>What was Janet Yellen doing when New Century went down?

0:35:43.719 --> 0:35:46.239
<v Speaker 10>I mean, and in fact, you know, the very last

0:35:46.280 --> 0:35:50.160
<v Speaker 10>chapter of fed Up argues that we needed fewer banking

0:35:50.239 --> 0:35:51.600
<v Speaker 10>districts than we have today.

0:35:51.760 --> 0:35:54.520
<v Speaker 2>Fed Up is Danielle di Martino Booth's book, Yes High.

0:35:54.600 --> 0:35:56.960
<v Speaker 11>Riders take on why the Federal Reserve is bad for America.

0:35:57.239 --> 0:36:00.120
<v Speaker 2>It really subtles up. I think Hugh Henry agrees with you.

0:36:00.960 --> 0:36:04.400
<v Speaker 11>Yeah, but better place.

0:36:05.040 --> 0:36:07.680
<v Speaker 10>I really do think that he's got noble Aames. Listen

0:36:07.719 --> 0:36:09.720
<v Speaker 10>to what's coming out of the Milking conference this week.

0:36:10.440 --> 0:36:12.880
<v Speaker 10>There's a lot of fear running through the private credit

0:36:12.960 --> 0:36:15.880
<v Speaker 10>markets right now that something is going to give, and

0:36:16.000 --> 0:36:18.160
<v Speaker 10>yet private credit makes the rules.

0:36:18.800 --> 0:36:20.800
<v Speaker 11>They dictate monetary policy.

0:36:21.080 --> 0:36:23.640
<v Speaker 10>They have for years, ever since Dodd, Frank and all

0:36:23.719 --> 0:36:26.680
<v Speaker 10>of the talent went bleeding out of the conventional banking system.

0:36:26.760 --> 0:36:28.960
<v Speaker 10>They're like, wait a minute, we can't make egregious amounts

0:36:28.960 --> 0:36:31.080
<v Speaker 10>of profits. Fine, We'll just leave and set up our

0:36:31.080 --> 0:36:33.320
<v Speaker 10>own little non banking system that's bigger than the conventional

0:36:33.360 --> 0:36:33.920
<v Speaker 10>banking system.

0:36:34.000 --> 0:36:36.879
<v Speaker 1>Hey, Barry, want to bring you in here again. Matt

0:36:36.920 --> 0:36:41.000
<v Speaker 1>and I we kind of got, you know, freaked out

0:36:41.000 --> 0:36:43.800
<v Speaker 1>by some of our previous guests talking about the banking situation.

0:36:44.200 --> 0:36:46.359
<v Speaker 1>I kind of feel like, just from my personal view,

0:36:46.680 --> 0:36:49.120
<v Speaker 1>I've kind of term it now a crisis where a

0:36:49.120 --> 0:36:51.719
<v Speaker 1>few days ago I wasn't there. How are you viewing

0:36:51.760 --> 0:36:54.319
<v Speaker 1>what's going on out there in the banking world, you

0:36:54.360 --> 0:36:54.640
<v Speaker 1>know what?

0:36:54.840 --> 0:36:57.520
<v Speaker 7>I look, I have a slightly different view than than

0:36:57.640 --> 0:37:00.959
<v Speaker 7>Daniel does about the impact of the FED and why

0:37:01.040 --> 0:37:03.759
<v Speaker 7>you don't want to unilaterally disarm and not have a

0:37:03.840 --> 0:37:09.080
<v Speaker 7>central bank. But that said, the FED was very belated

0:37:09.239 --> 0:37:12.960
<v Speaker 7>in recognizing inflation. Some people have made the claim it

0:37:13.200 --> 0:37:17.800
<v Speaker 7>was because Chairman Powell was in that holding pattern, waiting

0:37:17.840 --> 0:37:20.400
<v Speaker 7>to be confirmed that the FED was sitting on their hands.

0:37:20.680 --> 0:37:23.319
<v Speaker 7>They didn't want to be seen raising rates. I don't

0:37:23.360 --> 0:37:26.239
<v Speaker 7>know how true that is, but it's pretty clear that

0:37:26.280 --> 0:37:31.719
<v Speaker 7>the fastest rising rate environment of the modern era has

0:37:31.760 --> 0:37:35.200
<v Speaker 7>broken things. You can't take rates from zero to five

0:37:35.320 --> 0:37:39.080
<v Speaker 7>hundred bases points in twelve months and not cause some

0:37:39.120 --> 0:37:44.560
<v Speaker 7>sort of damage. So some of this is the Fed's responsibility. Now,

0:37:44.719 --> 0:37:48.200
<v Speaker 7>some of this is responsibility of the private sector bankers

0:37:48.560 --> 0:37:51.560
<v Speaker 7>who don't seem to understand duration risk in a rising

0:37:51.600 --> 0:37:54.680
<v Speaker 7>rate environment. That's pretty obvious. Even when we look at

0:37:54.760 --> 0:37:59.440
<v Speaker 7>Silicon Valley Bank. People forget those geniuses actually put a

0:37:59.520 --> 0:38:02.520
<v Speaker 7>hedge on on and were fine in their whole to

0:38:02.640 --> 0:38:06.799
<v Speaker 7>maturity book. They just realized how valuable that hedge was

0:38:06.880 --> 0:38:09.160
<v Speaker 7>and said, hey, if we sell this hedge, we can

0:38:09.200 --> 0:38:13.440
<v Speaker 7>all give ourselves bigger bonuses, not realizing but we're taking

0:38:13.480 --> 0:38:17.160
<v Speaker 7>our hedge off and putting our portfolios at risk. So

0:38:17.160 --> 0:38:22.640
<v Speaker 7>so I'm less inclined to blame fed supervision of all

0:38:22.680 --> 0:38:25.520
<v Speaker 7>the banks under them for not they were doing what

0:38:25.600 --> 0:38:27.960
<v Speaker 7>the banks were supposed to do, which is manage their

0:38:27.960 --> 0:38:28.439
<v Speaker 7>own risk.

0:38:28.680 --> 0:38:29.000
<v Speaker 11>Barry.

0:38:29.080 --> 0:38:32.520
<v Speaker 10>There there were red flags at Silicon Valley Bank, and

0:38:32.600 --> 0:38:35.120
<v Speaker 10>the regulators knew it, and the regulators did nothing about it.

0:38:35.120 --> 0:38:38.359
<v Speaker 10>And this was a presentation made in February of last year.

0:38:39.040 --> 0:38:42.960
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, yeah, they probably should have done something in February

0:38:42.960 --> 0:38:43.680
<v Speaker 2>of last year.

0:38:43.840 --> 0:38:48.400
<v Speaker 7>It wasn't nearly as catastrophic as it became.

0:38:48.120 --> 0:38:50.879
<v Speaker 2>But they were wive hundred bats later. They knew about

0:38:50.880 --> 0:38:54.160
<v Speaker 2>the whole to maturity portfolio. By the way, what, Danielle,

0:38:54.200 --> 0:38:56.880
<v Speaker 2>why don't they mark that stuff to market like weekly?

0:38:57.440 --> 0:39:00.680
<v Speaker 2>Why why are they allowed to just because we know

0:39:00.800 --> 0:39:04.759
<v Speaker 2>that then the valuations are insanely detached from reality. If

0:39:04.760 --> 0:39:07.200
<v Speaker 2>they only have to they never have to market, or.

0:39:07.239 --> 0:39:10.120
<v Speaker 10>Have an entire generation of banking regulators that are effectively

0:39:10.200 --> 0:39:12.840
<v Speaker 10>used to operating at the zero bound. I mean, but

0:39:13.280 --> 0:39:17.320
<v Speaker 10>that being said, Okay, the rules have changed, change your methodology,

0:39:17.800 --> 0:39:20.960
<v Speaker 10>change your approach. And if you've got all these red

0:39:20.960 --> 0:39:23.520
<v Speaker 10>flags on these banks and you know that they're making

0:39:23.560 --> 0:39:26.640
<v Speaker 10>insane commercial real estate loans, or that they've got a

0:39:26.719 --> 0:39:30.120
<v Speaker 10>highly concentrated book or that they're only banking to the

0:39:30.200 --> 0:39:31.440
<v Speaker 10>venture capital industry.

0:39:31.480 --> 0:39:33.279
<v Speaker 11>Then, for heaven's sake, factor that in.

0:39:33.960 --> 0:39:35.920
<v Speaker 2>I just don't barry. What do you think is the

0:39:35.920 --> 0:39:38.600
<v Speaker 2>bond market? Two? Opaque? Is it? Do we not have

0:39:38.680 --> 0:39:42.960
<v Speaker 2>the technology? Should we create a machine a terminal so

0:39:43.040 --> 0:39:46.719
<v Speaker 2>to speak? Could that allows GPT? Can AI help in

0:39:46.800 --> 0:39:49.160
<v Speaker 2>terms of why don't they mark their Why didn't First

0:39:49.200 --> 0:39:52.680
<v Speaker 2>Republic mark their mortgages on a regular basis? Is it

0:39:52.719 --> 0:39:53.360
<v Speaker 2>not possible?

0:39:54.320 --> 0:39:56.960
<v Speaker 7>Sure? All that stuff is possible. Keep in mind there

0:39:56.960 --> 0:40:00.560
<v Speaker 7>were some rules that required more aggressive disclosure and more

0:40:00.560 --> 0:40:04.560
<v Speaker 7>aggressive marks that the banking industry lobbied and actually got

0:40:04.560 --> 0:40:08.239
<v Speaker 7>approved a couple of years ago, which arguably certainly would

0:40:08.239 --> 0:40:10.280
<v Speaker 7>have helped. Singing that your bank probably would have helped

0:40:10.440 --> 0:40:13.160
<v Speaker 7>Silicon Valley Bank. You know, every time we go through

0:40:13.200 --> 0:40:17.759
<v Speaker 7>this cyclical from too much regulation to too little regulation,

0:40:18.239 --> 0:40:22.680
<v Speaker 7>it seems that banks demanding less oversight have a tendency

0:40:22.719 --> 0:40:25.160
<v Speaker 7>to blow themselves up.

0:40:25.200 --> 0:40:29.160
<v Speaker 10>But it was Silicon Valley Banks CEO Greg Becker himself

0:40:29.160 --> 0:40:31.440
<v Speaker 10>who sat on the San Francisco Board of Directors and

0:40:31.520 --> 0:40:37.680
<v Speaker 10>who personally successfully lobbied Congress to loosen the regulation. And

0:40:38.440 --> 0:40:42.160
<v Speaker 10>I mean clearly Chair Powell has now somebody's had their.

0:40:43.239 --> 0:40:44.359
<v Speaker 11>Behind handed to them.

0:40:44.640 --> 0:40:47.000
<v Speaker 10>I thought that I had to stop myself there. But

0:40:47.040 --> 0:40:49.400
<v Speaker 10>somebody's had their behind to hand it to them. And

0:40:49.440 --> 0:40:53.240
<v Speaker 10>now we know that we need to be stress testing

0:40:53.280 --> 0:40:57.400
<v Speaker 10>banks of a certain size and with bigger stress the

0:40:57.440 --> 0:41:00.920
<v Speaker 10>small community banks. However, that was a complete regulatory fumble

0:41:00.960 --> 0:41:04.120
<v Speaker 10>with Dodd Frank to target banks with ten billion dollars

0:41:04.160 --> 0:41:06.759
<v Speaker 10>of assets, and then they went out and made up

0:41:06.800 --> 0:41:09.520
<v Speaker 10>for having to cover the cost of compliance by making

0:41:09.560 --> 0:41:11.120
<v Speaker 10>go go commercial real estate loans.

0:41:11.440 --> 0:41:14.200
<v Speaker 1>So, Barry, are we going to see or do you

0:41:14.239 --> 0:41:15.920
<v Speaker 1>believe we will get to the point where the government

0:41:16.000 --> 0:41:18.320
<v Speaker 1>needs to step in somehow, whether it's the FDIC or

0:41:18.320 --> 0:41:20.280
<v Speaker 1>the FED and prop up this banking.

0:41:20.400 --> 0:41:22.000
<v Speaker 2>By the way, Barry, we should point out that we

0:41:22.040 --> 0:41:25.280
<v Speaker 2>had a Chris whalen on and Hugh henry on earlier

0:41:25.400 --> 0:41:29.600
<v Speaker 2>and they made some pretty extreme forecasts. They said that

0:41:29.640 --> 0:41:31.160
<v Speaker 2>regulators are going to have to come in and put

0:41:31.200 --> 0:41:36.000
<v Speaker 2>down deposit gates for US banks. I feel like, if

0:41:36.000 --> 0:41:38.720
<v Speaker 2>that's the case, that's the last thing that the government

0:41:38.719 --> 0:41:39.239
<v Speaker 2>will ever do.

0:41:39.719 --> 0:41:41.880
<v Speaker 7>Yeah, what are they? Hedge funds are in private equity.

0:41:41.880 --> 0:41:44.400
<v Speaker 7>They're allowed to not have people leave that. That doesn't

0:41:44.440 --> 0:41:48.839
<v Speaker 7>make any sense. I think what the real key is

0:41:51.480 --> 0:41:56.759
<v Speaker 7>that we need to have much more robust approach to oversight,

0:41:56.960 --> 0:42:02.359
<v Speaker 7>and that allowing banks this mad lobbying approach to say

0:42:02.400 --> 0:42:07.239
<v Speaker 7>we want less oversight, less regulation, less capital reserves required

0:42:09.000 --> 0:42:12.520
<v Speaker 7>is really problematic. But here's the key thing I think

0:42:12.560 --> 0:42:16.719
<v Speaker 7>we should focus on. When when we had the financial crisis,

0:42:17.200 --> 0:42:21.440
<v Speaker 7>everybody had eaten at the same poisoned buffet, and so

0:42:21.560 --> 0:42:25.440
<v Speaker 7>you had this systemic problem of every bank, every broker,

0:42:25.600 --> 0:42:30.000
<v Speaker 7>every non regulated bank all had consumed the same toxic

0:42:30.960 --> 0:42:33.799
<v Speaker 7>things which they either securitized or subsequently bought, and so

0:42:33.880 --> 0:42:37.160
<v Speaker 7>the whole system was put at risk. Yeah, the FED

0:42:37.200 --> 0:42:40.680
<v Speaker 7>has raise rates too quickly and they've broken things. It

0:42:40.719 --> 0:42:45.680
<v Speaker 7>doesn't appear that the entire system is at risk just yet.

0:42:46.080 --> 0:42:48.759
<v Speaker 7>If the FED keeps raising if they if they keep

0:42:48.800 --> 0:42:53.160
<v Speaker 7>breaking things, then we could have other issues. Maybe these

0:42:53.200 --> 0:42:56.719
<v Speaker 7>banks should be holding their long term treasuries in hold

0:42:56.760 --> 0:43:01.000
<v Speaker 7>to maturity instead of assets that could be sold. Maybe

0:43:01.000 --> 0:43:04.720
<v Speaker 7>that's one solution. This all comes back to, you're less

0:43:04.760 --> 0:43:08.960
<v Speaker 7>profitable if you have more capital on the books. Maybe

0:43:09.000 --> 0:43:12.320
<v Speaker 7>you need to think of yourselves as a sleepy utility

0:43:12.400 --> 0:43:16.160
<v Speaker 7>in bank and accept lower profit margin in order to

0:43:16.160 --> 0:43:17.080
<v Speaker 7>increase stability.

0:43:17.120 --> 0:43:19.320
<v Speaker 1>We've had a couple of days of central bank speak.

0:43:19.760 --> 0:43:22.840
<v Speaker 1>They fed yesterday, the ECB today, they seem to be

0:43:22.880 --> 0:43:25.439
<v Speaker 1>in sync. Anything kind of jump out of you from

0:43:25.480 --> 0:43:26.320
<v Speaker 1>either bank.

0:43:27.120 --> 0:43:30.720
<v Speaker 7>Yeah, I continue to be struck by how both central

0:43:30.760 --> 0:43:36.000
<v Speaker 7>banks seem to be far far behind the data about

0:43:36.239 --> 0:43:38.719
<v Speaker 7>when inflation peaked and how much further it's going to

0:43:38.760 --> 0:43:42.560
<v Speaker 7>come down. And I know the phrase transitory has gotten

0:43:43.040 --> 0:43:47.360
<v Speaker 7>a bad rap, but transitory seems to have taken longer

0:43:47.360 --> 0:43:53.400
<v Speaker 7>than expected by most measures. Goods peaked June twenty twenty

0:43:53.400 --> 0:43:56.640
<v Speaker 7>two and have come appreciably down. I heard you guys

0:43:56.640 --> 0:44:00.680
<v Speaker 7>call talking earlier this morning about oil at sixty seven dollars.

0:44:00.719 --> 0:44:04.120
<v Speaker 7>Wherever we look at the things that were really prime

0:44:04.200 --> 0:44:09.360
<v Speaker 7>drivers of inflation over the past couple of years, lumber prices, medals,

0:44:10.280 --> 0:44:14.280
<v Speaker 7>car prices, shipping containers, even just the course of costs

0:44:14.320 --> 0:44:18.960
<v Speaker 7>of transport, they've all come down appreciably. In some cases,

0:44:19.000 --> 0:44:23.080
<v Speaker 7>like lumber, they're below where they were when the pandemic started.

0:44:23.280 --> 0:44:28.000
<v Speaker 7>And so yes, services remain elevated. But the largest part

0:44:28.120 --> 0:44:33.560
<v Speaker 7>of services is owner's equivalent rent, and that's driven in

0:44:33.719 --> 0:44:37.000
<v Speaker 7>large part by where mortgage rates are. And guess who's

0:44:37.040 --> 0:44:40.640
<v Speaker 7>driven mortgage rates higher in the United States. It's the FED.

0:44:40.760 --> 0:44:44.440
<v Speaker 7>Europe is a little different set of circumstances. They are

0:44:44.600 --> 0:44:49.279
<v Speaker 7>behind us both in terms of the economic recovery and inflation,

0:44:50.560 --> 0:44:53.800
<v Speaker 7>but it always seems like they're late to the party

0:44:54.000 --> 0:44:55.520
<v Speaker 7>and fighting the previous lies.

0:44:55.560 --> 0:44:59.520
<v Speaker 2>So is inflation coming down rapidly? Do you think because

0:44:59.560 --> 0:45:03.840
<v Speaker 2>Powells seem to think yesterday Danielle that inflation could still

0:45:03.880 --> 0:45:06.480
<v Speaker 2>rear its ugly head. He's very careful and has been

0:45:06.520 --> 0:45:10.440
<v Speaker 2>about this. He doesn't want to repeat Arthur Burns. What

0:45:10.480 --> 0:45:11.040
<v Speaker 2>do you think?

0:45:11.200 --> 0:45:13.279
<v Speaker 10>So I have a little bit of a different view

0:45:13.320 --> 0:45:16.480
<v Speaker 10>on this. I believe, and we were talking about this

0:45:16.600 --> 0:45:17.200
<v Speaker 10>during the break.

0:45:17.239 --> 0:45:18.080
<v Speaker 11>I believe that j.

0:45:18.280 --> 0:45:22.839
<v Speaker 10>Powell wants for monetary policy to actually affect the non

0:45:22.960 --> 0:45:26.400
<v Speaker 10>banking sector. So it's he's not dim. He knows that

0:45:26.440 --> 0:45:30.839
<v Speaker 10>inflation's coming down. He knows that Barry and I are mutual friend,

0:45:30.840 --> 0:45:33.840
<v Speaker 10>Peter book bar He knows that there's at least a

0:45:33.840 --> 0:45:37.160
<v Speaker 10>half a percentage point of additional tightening as of First Republic.

0:45:37.440 --> 0:45:39.240
<v Speaker 10>Now we might have one hundred basis points of additional

0:45:39.239 --> 0:45:41.279
<v Speaker 10>tightening in the form of the credit credit crunch that

0:45:41.280 --> 0:45:41.800
<v Speaker 10>we're seeing.

0:45:42.080 --> 0:45:44.080
<v Speaker 2>Peter book far from Miller tayback.

0:45:43.760 --> 0:45:46.080
<v Speaker 11>And back in the day now, is it blately?

0:45:46.160 --> 0:45:49.520
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, the book report, the book report boosk.

0:45:50.440 --> 0:45:54.279
<v Speaker 10>But the fact is, I think J. Powell knows this,

0:45:54.920 --> 0:45:58.640
<v Speaker 10>and I think J. Powell wants to continue with quantitative tightening.

0:45:58.680 --> 0:46:00.799
<v Speaker 10>He wants to continue that in the back background, and

0:46:00.840 --> 0:46:03.759
<v Speaker 10>he's got to have something to hide behind, for lack

0:46:03.800 --> 0:46:05.560
<v Speaker 10>of a better word, in order.

0:46:05.360 --> 0:46:09.879
<v Speaker 11>To keep this going, keep what going, keep quantitative tightening going,

0:46:09.960 --> 0:46:11.280
<v Speaker 11>keep shrinking the balance sheet.

0:46:11.600 --> 0:46:14.000
<v Speaker 7>Yeah, but that can happen gradually, and the.

0:46:14.000 --> 0:46:16.680
<v Speaker 2>Problem is exaggerary gradual already. Yeah.

0:46:16.560 --> 0:46:20.520
<v Speaker 7>The problem isn't the actual absolute level of rates, it's

0:46:20.560 --> 0:46:24.920
<v Speaker 7>how quickly we've gotten here by historic measures. FED funds

0:46:25.000 --> 0:46:28.759
<v Speaker 7>rate and even mortgage rates are not crazy, they're just

0:46:28.840 --> 0:46:31.480
<v Speaker 7>crazy relative to the past. Doesn't the acute level hurt

0:46:31.520 --> 0:46:34.880
<v Speaker 7>as well? I mean, this is Hugh Henry was making that,

0:46:35.000 --> 0:46:39.720
<v Speaker 7>you know, twenty percent in nineteen eighty when total debt

0:46:39.920 --> 0:46:43.719
<v Speaker 7>was you know, one time's GDP, it's just as bad

0:46:43.719 --> 0:46:46.680
<v Speaker 7>as five percent now when total debt to GDP is

0:46:47.000 --> 0:46:49.759
<v Speaker 7>four times. I don't really buy that. I've been hearing

0:46:49.800 --> 0:46:52.600
<v Speaker 7>my entire adult life that you know, if we keep

0:46:52.680 --> 0:46:55.919
<v Speaker 7>running debt and deficits. You know, no one will lend

0:46:55.960 --> 0:46:58.800
<v Speaker 7>to Uncle Sam. The economy will crash and the dollar

0:46:58.880 --> 0:47:00.160
<v Speaker 7>will collas.

0:46:59.680 --> 0:47:01.640
<v Speaker 2>Just that the caring costs are very high.

0:47:01.760 --> 0:47:03.600
<v Speaker 7>Yeah, they're going to continue to be caught high. But

0:47:03.880 --> 0:47:07.279
<v Speaker 7>you know, look at Japan, they're double our GDP to

0:47:07.360 --> 0:47:10.480
<v Speaker 7>debt ratio. It hasn't affected their ability to borrow it

0:47:10.600 --> 0:47:14.000
<v Speaker 7>practically zero or for their GDP to continue chugging along.

0:47:14.239 --> 0:47:19.000
<v Speaker 7>They have other demographic concerns, but I worry much less

0:47:19.120 --> 0:47:22.640
<v Speaker 7>about the actual level of debt. Would it be better

0:47:22.680 --> 0:47:25.600
<v Speaker 7>if rates were a little lower, Sure, but I don't

0:47:25.600 --> 0:47:28.040
<v Speaker 7>think a couple of percentage points are going to make

0:47:28.360 --> 0:47:32.080
<v Speaker 7>a big difference to something like seeing that your bank

0:47:32.200 --> 0:47:35.520
<v Speaker 7>or Silicon Valley Bank or First Republic or any of

0:47:35.560 --> 0:47:39.400
<v Speaker 7>the other banks that ran into trouble for very specific

0:47:39.719 --> 0:47:43.759
<v Speaker 7>managerial errors that were exacerbated by the rapidity of the

0:47:43.800 --> 0:47:44.760
<v Speaker 7>Fed race.

0:47:45.040 --> 0:47:48.320
<v Speaker 11>So think about think about this for just a second.

0:47:48.400 --> 0:47:52.360
<v Speaker 10>Remember Standard Impoorsy, we were there in Maine. Standard impor

0:47:52.400 --> 0:47:55.040
<v Speaker 10>Is downgraded the debt of the United States August the fifth,

0:47:55.040 --> 0:47:58.520
<v Speaker 10>twenty eleven because there had been no reforms done during

0:47:58.560 --> 0:48:01.520
<v Speaker 10>the debt ceiling kerfuffle. What if this moment of higher

0:48:01.600 --> 0:48:04.920
<v Speaker 10>interest rates actually brings a serious discussion to the table

0:48:04.960 --> 0:48:07.520
<v Speaker 10>about some of the reforms that are desperately needed with

0:48:07.600 --> 0:48:09.759
<v Speaker 10>our fiscal spending. And I'm not necessarily talking about the

0:48:09.840 --> 0:48:13.120
<v Speaker 10>level of debt and or deficits, but being rational about

0:48:13.160 --> 0:48:16.160
<v Speaker 10>the trajectory of the growth and going to the table

0:48:16.160 --> 0:48:18.600
<v Speaker 10>and seriously taking this debt situation serious.

0:48:18.680 --> 0:48:21.600
<v Speaker 2>So, Berry, I'm sure you read that a couple of

0:48:21.680 --> 0:48:24.360
<v Speaker 2>days ago, Stan Druckenmiller was speaking I think it was

0:48:24.520 --> 0:48:28.560
<v Speaker 2>USC at the USC School of Business, and he said

0:48:28.960 --> 0:48:31.959
<v Speaker 2>that we're all sitting here worried about a thirty foot

0:48:32.360 --> 0:48:34.799
<v Speaker 2>wave in the form of the debt sealing problem, when

0:48:34.800 --> 0:48:37.080
<v Speaker 2>we should be worried about the two hundred foot tsunami

0:48:37.200 --> 0:48:39.919
<v Speaker 2>just ten miles out in the form of the total debt.

0:48:40.239 --> 0:48:43.600
<v Speaker 7>So so first, let me just remind everybody that shortly

0:48:43.680 --> 0:48:46.480
<v Speaker 7>after the S and P five hundred I'm sorry, shortainly

0:48:46.520 --> 0:48:50.440
<v Speaker 7>after the SMP as a ratings agency lowered the US

0:48:50.719 --> 0:48:52.640
<v Speaker 7>credit worthiness.

0:48:52.040 --> 0:48:53.560
<v Speaker 2>I guess what happened to treasuries?

0:48:53.760 --> 0:48:57.040
<v Speaker 7>Rates went lower, went lower, Right, It's like, oh, hold

0:48:57.040 --> 0:49:00.319
<v Speaker 7>my beer, watch this. And so if we if the

0:49:00.320 --> 0:49:05.280
<v Speaker 7>financial crisis didn't teach us that the least valuable entity

0:49:05.480 --> 0:49:09.160
<v Speaker 7>in the entire known universe are the credit rating agencies.

0:49:09.200 --> 0:49:12.920
<v Speaker 7>Then you weren't paying attention, there were worthless. Then they're worthless.

0:49:12.960 --> 0:49:17.040
<v Speaker 7>Now they'll be worthless in the future. Nobody should care about.

0:49:16.760 --> 0:49:19.080
<v Speaker 11>It, So fade the credit rating agencies.

0:49:19.120 --> 0:49:21.520
<v Speaker 10>Isn't it still nice to think that we could, actually,

0:49:21.920 --> 0:49:25.560
<v Speaker 10>like adults, approach fiscal reform again?

0:49:25.640 --> 0:49:27.719
<v Speaker 7>If you if you look at what the market is

0:49:27.760 --> 0:49:30.880
<v Speaker 7>telling us, it doesn't matter all thatch Are you a

0:49:30.920 --> 0:49:33.040
<v Speaker 7>mathematic say that again?

0:49:33.120 --> 0:49:36.360
<v Speaker 2>Are you a magic money tree guy? No, I'm you know,

0:49:37.200 --> 0:49:38.279
<v Speaker 2>I'm a hemmingway guy.

0:49:38.440 --> 0:49:42.399
<v Speaker 7>That it's very gradual until all at once, and right

0:49:42.440 --> 0:49:45.800
<v Speaker 7>now it's still very gradual. And when we look at Japan,

0:49:46.520 --> 0:49:49.600
<v Speaker 7>they're much further down the debt rabbit hole than we are,

0:49:50.120 --> 0:49:54.680
<v Speaker 7>and they're still in that gradual process. At some point

0:49:54.800 --> 0:49:58.000
<v Speaker 7>in the future, all of this debt will matter, but

0:49:58.400 --> 0:50:01.799
<v Speaker 7>it's going to be the way people go bankrupt gradually

0:50:01.840 --> 0:50:03.719
<v Speaker 7>and then all at once, and we're still in the

0:50:03.760 --> 0:50:04.440
<v Speaker 7>gradual thing.

0:50:04.600 --> 0:50:05.160
<v Speaker 11>I would too.

0:50:05.239 --> 0:50:08.480
<v Speaker 10>I've got kids, and they'll have kids, and we should

0:50:08.480 --> 0:50:11.200
<v Speaker 10>be thinking about future generations and not necessarily.

0:50:10.800 --> 0:50:12.440
<v Speaker 2>What we're trying to do is rip them off to

0:50:12.480 --> 0:50:13.440
<v Speaker 2>pay for our retirement.

0:50:13.640 --> 0:50:15.319
<v Speaker 10>Yeah, but that's been going on for that's been going

0:50:15.360 --> 0:50:17.480
<v Speaker 10>on right forever, forever, exactly.

0:50:17.480 --> 0:50:19.560
<v Speaker 7>All right, at a certain point when to keep it

0:50:19.600 --> 0:50:22.359
<v Speaker 7>going the boy who cried wolf. At a certain point,

0:50:22.440 --> 0:50:23.799
<v Speaker 7>nobody pays attention, And all.

0:50:23.800 --> 0:50:25.279
<v Speaker 1>Right, we guys, we got to cut off there. Thank

0:50:25.320 --> 0:50:26.399
<v Speaker 1>you for the extended stay.

0:50:26.440 --> 0:50:27.000
<v Speaker 2>We appreciate it.

0:50:27.080 --> 0:50:30.320
<v Speaker 1>Barry Ridolts, founder of Ridolts Wealth Management, and Danielle Di Martino,

0:50:30.360 --> 0:50:34.239
<v Speaker 1>Booth CEO and chief strategists at QI helping us kind

0:50:34.239 --> 0:50:36.279
<v Speaker 1>of frame out what's going on in these markets. Well

0:50:36.320 --> 0:50:38.200
<v Speaker 1>more coming up. This is Bloomberg.

0:50:40.120 --> 0:50:43.520
<v Speaker 6>You're listening to the teenth Ken's Are Live program Bloomberg

0:50:43.600 --> 0:50:46.960
<v Speaker 6>Markets weekdays at ten am eastering on Bloomberg dot com,

0:50:47.040 --> 0:50:50.160
<v Speaker 6>the iHeartRadio app and the Bloomberg Business App, or listen

0:50:50.239 --> 0:50:52.359
<v Speaker 6>on demand wherever you get your podcasts.

0:50:54.440 --> 0:50:56.480
<v Speaker 1>All right, let's get right back to the discussion here.

0:50:56.480 --> 0:50:58.040
<v Speaker 1>We're going to bring in our next guest. We really

0:50:58.120 --> 0:51:00.799
<v Speaker 1>always appreciate getting a few minutes of ret I'm Claudia Sam,

0:51:01.280 --> 0:51:06.600
<v Speaker 1>founder and independent economists at Some Consulting. Claudia, We've had

0:51:06.640 --> 0:51:11.120
<v Speaker 1>a lot of Federal Central Bank discussion and moving over

0:51:11.120 --> 0:51:12.560
<v Speaker 1>the past couple of days, but it seems to be

0:51:12.560 --> 0:51:14.839
<v Speaker 1>pushed a little bit to the background by what's going

0:51:14.840 --> 0:51:18.160
<v Speaker 1>on with the US regional banks. How are you viewing

0:51:18.200 --> 0:51:20.600
<v Speaker 1>what's happening out there with the banks? How concerned are

0:51:20.640 --> 0:51:23.920
<v Speaker 1>you about how this may be maybe more systemic than

0:51:23.960 --> 0:51:24.520
<v Speaker 1>others think?

0:51:25.800 --> 0:51:28.239
<v Speaker 12>Right this week has really been a competition for the

0:51:28.280 --> 0:51:30.480
<v Speaker 12>worst thing happening in the US economy. I mean, it's

0:51:30.480 --> 0:51:33.680
<v Speaker 12>pretty amazing to have the dead ceiling eclipsed. In addition,

0:51:34.600 --> 0:51:38.439
<v Speaker 12>I absolutely think that there should be concern about what's

0:51:38.440 --> 0:51:42.520
<v Speaker 12>happening with the regional banks. Would chair Pow said yesterday

0:51:42.600 --> 0:51:46.359
<v Speaker 12>the banking system is resilient in sound. That is a

0:51:46.400 --> 0:51:51.440
<v Speaker 12>true statement, and yet fundamentals are not enough to bring

0:51:51.960 --> 0:51:55.800
<v Speaker 12>contagion and this kind of downward spiral that we're seeing

0:51:55.920 --> 0:52:01.319
<v Speaker 12>under control. So it's really disconcerting that this is continued

0:52:01.840 --> 0:52:06.239
<v Speaker 12>and it's not clear how this ends, whether we really

0:52:06.320 --> 0:52:08.919
<v Speaker 12>are seeing the end of it. It doesn't appear that way.

0:52:10.120 --> 0:52:13.319
<v Speaker 2>Are you concerned about I mean, it doesn't seem like

0:52:13.360 --> 0:52:18.640
<v Speaker 2>regulators did much in terms of stopping this collapse of

0:52:18.760 --> 0:52:22.120
<v Speaker 2>SVB or First Republic. Are they gonna Is there something

0:52:22.120 --> 0:52:24.520
<v Speaker 2>they can do now? Claudia that that you can think of.

0:52:25.760 --> 0:52:28.239
<v Speaker 12>They're in a difficult position. In the beginning, they were

0:52:28.280 --> 0:52:32.720
<v Speaker 12>just flat footed, right, Silicon Valley Bank came out of nowhere.

0:52:32.880 --> 0:52:34.719
<v Speaker 2>I mean it should but they've known for They've known

0:52:34.760 --> 0:52:35.239
<v Speaker 2>for a year.

0:52:36.080 --> 0:52:36.959
<v Speaker 11>Yeah, no, they.

0:52:36.920 --> 0:52:40.120
<v Speaker 12>Knew, but I mean it's it's different between knowing something

0:52:40.160 --> 0:52:43.359
<v Speaker 12>and acting in a serious way, and they acted in

0:52:43.400 --> 0:52:46.040
<v Speaker 12>a serious way. They're at a point now and the

0:52:46.120 --> 0:52:50.040
<v Speaker 12>FDI see like this is they're doing the playbook. Now

0:52:50.200 --> 0:52:52.640
<v Speaker 12>banks are in trouble and then they you know, find

0:52:52.640 --> 0:52:54.839
<v Speaker 12>a buyer and so things are in more of that

0:52:55.000 --> 0:52:59.520
<v Speaker 12>state of now quote unquote business as usual when you

0:52:59.520 --> 0:53:03.880
<v Speaker 12>have banks understrain. And yet the piece that is really

0:53:03.920 --> 0:53:06.320
<v Speaker 12>hard for policy makers, and this is why the genie

0:53:06.320 --> 0:53:09.279
<v Speaker 12>out of the bottle was such a big problem, is

0:53:09.320 --> 0:53:13.200
<v Speaker 12>you have this psychology. J Pal can tell people all

0:53:13.239 --> 0:53:16.640
<v Speaker 12>he wants the banking system resilient, nothing to see here,

0:53:17.239 --> 0:53:20.279
<v Speaker 12>and they are not believing it right. And so this

0:53:20.400 --> 0:53:23.359
<v Speaker 12>is the tricky part. And honestly, I don't know how

0:53:23.400 --> 0:53:27.120
<v Speaker 12>the policy makers pull this back in because you say

0:53:27.120 --> 0:53:31.080
<v Speaker 12>the wrong word like pac West said last night about

0:53:31.080 --> 0:53:33.759
<v Speaker 12>their you know, strategic looking for a buyer, and things

0:53:33.800 --> 0:53:35.160
<v Speaker 12>can really go south. Quickly.

0:53:35.680 --> 0:53:39.839
<v Speaker 1>So, Claudia, how concerned are you that you know this

0:53:39.920 --> 0:53:42.839
<v Speaker 1>banking crisis that many people are calling and I think

0:53:42.840 --> 0:53:45.160
<v Speaker 1>I might be in that camp now, will in fact

0:53:45.200 --> 0:53:49.280
<v Speaker 1>have a material impact on the availability and the affordability

0:53:49.320 --> 0:53:51.600
<v Speaker 1>of credits such that it really will have a big

0:53:51.800 --> 0:53:53.120
<v Speaker 1>impact on this economy.

0:53:54.520 --> 0:53:57.840
<v Speaker 12>You will absolutely have a big impact on small businesses

0:53:57.880 --> 0:54:01.000
<v Speaker 12>that do a lot of their business with smaller and

0:54:01.280 --> 0:54:04.640
<v Speaker 12>regional banks. It will have an impact, though it may

0:54:04.680 --> 0:54:07.959
<v Speaker 12>be slow moving, and impact on commercial real estate, which

0:54:07.960 --> 0:54:13.520
<v Speaker 12>again does a lot of business with regional banks. It's

0:54:14.000 --> 0:54:15.960
<v Speaker 12>and we're going to see this not just in the

0:54:16.080 --> 0:54:19.040
<v Speaker 12>interest rates, right the Federal Reserve continues to raise interest

0:54:19.120 --> 0:54:21.840
<v Speaker 12>rates though there's a lot going on in the markets.

0:54:22.080 --> 0:54:23.759
<v Speaker 12>What we are seeing, and I think we're going to

0:54:23.880 --> 0:54:26.479
<v Speaker 12>absolutely see next week when we get the Senior Loan

0:54:26.520 --> 0:54:30.719
<v Speaker 12>Officer and Opinion survey, is that we see standards tightening.

0:54:31.040 --> 0:54:35.080
<v Speaker 12>So this is about the supply of credit getting harder,

0:54:35.160 --> 0:54:38.000
<v Speaker 12>and that you know, it's one thing to just say, hey,

0:54:38.080 --> 0:54:40.560
<v Speaker 12>i'm a business, I'll pay more for the credit. It's

0:54:40.600 --> 0:54:43.319
<v Speaker 12>another thing to say I just can't get it right.

0:54:43.360 --> 0:54:46.480
<v Speaker 12>And that does limit the kind of opportunities that they

0:54:46.520 --> 0:54:51.200
<v Speaker 12>have to grow and expand and have keep their workers right.

0:54:51.239 --> 0:54:53.279
<v Speaker 12>So it can have a lot of effects, and it

0:54:53.320 --> 0:54:56.960
<v Speaker 12>will have effects in these local, more localized communities. It's

0:54:56.960 --> 0:54:59.359
<v Speaker 12>an open question as to how much it spills over

0:55:00.200 --> 0:55:03.200
<v Speaker 12>like in aggregate, But the longer this goes on, the

0:55:03.320 --> 0:55:04.600
<v Speaker 12>higher those chances go.

0:55:05.160 --> 0:55:08.160
<v Speaker 2>And I think that this conversation then dovetails nicely with

0:55:08.320 --> 0:55:11.239
<v Speaker 2>your column, with the column that you put on the

0:55:11.280 --> 0:55:15.279
<v Speaker 2>Bloomberg Terminal about labor market tightness and the issue of yes,

0:55:15.320 --> 0:55:18.880
<v Speaker 2>we're at a nationally a record low for unemployment, but

0:55:18.920 --> 0:55:22.160
<v Speaker 2>if you look in pockets, you know, big important states

0:55:22.200 --> 0:55:25.360
<v Speaker 2>like New York and Ohio, we still don't have employment

0:55:25.440 --> 0:55:29.239
<v Speaker 2>levels back up to where they were pre pandemic. I

0:55:29.320 --> 0:55:33.000
<v Speaker 2>was listening to Diane Swank talk yesterday on our FED

0:55:33.040 --> 0:55:35.480
<v Speaker 2>special and she pointed out the importance of small and

0:55:35.560 --> 0:55:40.320
<v Speaker 2>medium sized companies as employers, and these are the companies

0:55:40.320 --> 0:55:42.360
<v Speaker 2>that are going to be directly affected by a regional

0:55:42.400 --> 0:55:47.160
<v Speaker 2>banking credit crunch. Does that, you know, does this exacerbate

0:55:47.200 --> 0:55:50.920
<v Speaker 2>the problems that you know, these these localities and especially

0:55:52.239 --> 0:55:56.280
<v Speaker 2>you know, underfunded, underbanked communities have in terms of getting

0:55:56.360 --> 0:55:56.919
<v Speaker 2>jobs back.

0:55:58.000 --> 0:56:02.799
<v Speaker 12>Absolutely, Diana's right, The small businesses or the heartbeat of

0:56:02.920 --> 0:56:06.439
<v Speaker 12>the employment that we have in the country, and they're

0:56:06.480 --> 0:56:09.320
<v Speaker 12>the ones that are going to have difficulty accessing credit.

0:56:11.480 --> 0:56:13.759
<v Speaker 12>In the column I was talking about today, where like

0:56:14.000 --> 0:56:16.560
<v Speaker 12>we should be careful on Safe Jobs Day tomorrow when

0:56:16.600 --> 0:56:19.480
<v Speaker 12>we get the aggregate numbers and we have Chair Powles

0:56:19.480 --> 0:56:22.560
<v Speaker 12>saying we have a very tight labor market, we need

0:56:22.600 --> 0:56:25.680
<v Speaker 12>to be careful. There's a lot of variation across the country.

0:56:26.320 --> 0:56:30.720
<v Speaker 12>Right now, about forty percent of the US states haven't

0:56:31.120 --> 0:56:35.239
<v Speaker 12>achieved their pre pandemic employment levels, and then you've got

0:56:35.280 --> 0:56:38.239
<v Speaker 12>another twenty percent that are well above it. So we

0:56:39.520 --> 0:56:42.440
<v Speaker 12>don't have a tight labor market in every labor market

0:56:42.520 --> 0:56:44.239
<v Speaker 12>we have kind of when you add it all up,

0:56:44.280 --> 0:56:47.600
<v Speaker 12>it looks like, you know, there's a shortage of workers.

0:56:47.600 --> 0:56:50.680
<v Speaker 12>That's not the case. The Federal Reserve and by letting

0:56:50.719 --> 0:56:54.520
<v Speaker 12>them dominate the conversation about the economy, their tools are

0:56:54.680 --> 0:56:58.600
<v Speaker 12>very blonde, their mandates are national. But we have so

0:56:58.680 --> 0:57:02.520
<v Speaker 12>many other policy makers that can be much more targeted.

0:57:02.560 --> 0:57:05.239
<v Speaker 12>But we have to actually, you know, admit that there's

0:57:05.280 --> 0:57:08.840
<v Speaker 12>this diversity and then think about how how to address it.

0:57:08.960 --> 0:57:11.240
<v Speaker 2>So how do we I saw one of the lines

0:57:11.760 --> 0:57:15.400
<v Speaker 2>in your in your column, geographic realignment could help address

0:57:15.440 --> 0:57:17.959
<v Speaker 2>some of the national labor shortages, and I was trying

0:57:17.960 --> 0:57:20.080
<v Speaker 2>to think of, you know, how the FED could be

0:57:20.320 --> 0:57:23.280
<v Speaker 2>involved in geographic realignment. But as you point out, their

0:57:23.280 --> 0:57:27.200
<v Speaker 2>tools are blunt, which regulators need to be you need

0:57:27.560 --> 0:57:29.000
<v Speaker 2>to be brought in and what do they need to do.

0:57:30.520 --> 0:57:33.400
<v Speaker 12>Well when that, you know, we have a potentially looming

0:57:33.840 --> 0:57:36.680
<v Speaker 12>recession that we should be preparing for. You know, hope

0:57:36.680 --> 0:57:39.560
<v Speaker 12>for the best, but prepare for the worst. And one

0:57:39.640 --> 0:57:42.640
<v Speaker 12>thing that we can do, and we're putting policies in place,

0:57:43.320 --> 0:57:46.520
<v Speaker 12>is to target and particularly when the policies phase out,

0:57:46.600 --> 0:57:50.480
<v Speaker 12>to the local labor market conditions. So the unemployment insurance

0:57:50.560 --> 0:57:53.680
<v Speaker 12>ought to phase out is that state's unemployment rate gets

0:57:53.720 --> 0:57:56.960
<v Speaker 12>back to normal. We saw a lot of problems with

0:57:57.080 --> 0:57:59.479
<v Speaker 12>the politics of it when we had just a date

0:58:00.160 --> 0:58:02.240
<v Speaker 12>in the last you know, in the last recession where

0:58:02.240 --> 0:58:05.000
<v Speaker 12>it turned off, and they just didn't take into account

0:58:05.000 --> 0:58:07.040
<v Speaker 12>that some states it took a lot longer for them

0:58:07.040 --> 0:58:10.960
<v Speaker 12>to recover, they're still recovering, and others really came back strong.

0:58:11.360 --> 0:58:14.200
<v Speaker 12>So if you want to use money effectively and equitably,

0:58:14.520 --> 0:58:17.760
<v Speaker 12>then you know, look at the reality of what's going

0:58:17.760 --> 0:58:21.480
<v Speaker 12>on in terms of now to build resilience because a

0:58:21.520 --> 0:58:25.880
<v Speaker 12>lot of our communities that were struggling before COVID, they

0:58:25.920 --> 0:58:29.160
<v Speaker 12>got hit really hard and they're still struggling. And we

0:58:29.200 --> 0:58:34.000
<v Speaker 12>have large programs like CHIPS infrastructure that you could say,

0:58:34.320 --> 0:58:37.760
<v Speaker 12>let's give some priority to communities that haven't recovered yet.

0:58:38.040 --> 0:58:42.760
<v Speaker 2>So a question came up in my head reading your column.

0:58:42.760 --> 0:58:45.600
<v Speaker 2>And I want to preface this by saying, I'm a

0:58:45.680 --> 0:58:50.520
<v Speaker 2>total idiot when it comes to economics, and so don't

0:58:50.840 --> 0:58:54.200
<v Speaker 2>get angry if this is a bad question. Is there

0:58:54.400 --> 0:58:58.320
<v Speaker 2>some kind of mobility program that we could put out

0:58:58.320 --> 0:59:00.880
<v Speaker 2>there which would which would help the realignment? I mean,

0:59:01.520 --> 0:59:03.360
<v Speaker 2>I guess if you're looking for a job in New

0:59:03.440 --> 0:59:05.800
<v Speaker 2>York and you can't find one, you're probably not in

0:59:05.800 --> 0:59:07.360
<v Speaker 2>a position to relocate to Florida.

0:59:07.440 --> 0:59:07.640
<v Speaker 1>Right.

0:59:08.120 --> 0:59:10.040
<v Speaker 2>Is there is there any way that we could help

0:59:10.120 --> 0:59:13.040
<v Speaker 2>that relocation that mobility Would that be a good solution.

0:59:14.320 --> 0:59:18.040
<v Speaker 12>For a long time, economists had been big proponents of

0:59:18.160 --> 0:59:21.840
<v Speaker 12>moving people to prosperity, right, So moving people from the

0:59:21.880 --> 0:59:25.040
<v Speaker 12>heartland to the New York cities, the Bay areas, you

0:59:25.040 --> 0:59:27.680
<v Speaker 12>know that had a lot of jobs, and you know,

0:59:27.760 --> 0:59:29.720
<v Speaker 12>I grew up in the Midwest. The last thing my

0:59:29.800 --> 0:59:31.840
<v Speaker 12>family wants to do in Indiana is moved to New

0:59:31.920 --> 0:59:35.400
<v Speaker 12>York City, right, Like, that's just it's a non starter.

0:59:35.560 --> 0:59:37.800
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, but what about Orlando. New York's not a great

0:59:37.800 --> 0:59:40.160
<v Speaker 2>place right now? If the sun Dell's a good place to.

0:59:40.080 --> 0:59:44.800
<v Speaker 12>Go, It's true, and it right like the communities now,

0:59:44.840 --> 0:59:48.520
<v Speaker 12>I think where we've come around to is we must

0:59:48.560 --> 0:59:52.320
<v Speaker 12>figure out a way to invest in the communities. There's

0:59:52.360 --> 0:59:54.480
<v Speaker 12>a lot of you know, Atlanta took a lot of

0:59:54.520 --> 0:59:57.520
<v Speaker 12>effort after the Great Recession. They really struggled with some

0:59:57.600 --> 0:59:59.800
<v Speaker 12>of the comeback in jobs as a lot of the

1:00:00.760 --> 1:00:05.080
<v Speaker 12>and they really built up their workforce development networks. That's

1:00:05.280 --> 1:00:07.120
<v Speaker 12>one of those are hard to build up. But when

1:00:07.160 --> 1:00:09.040
<v Speaker 12>you take the view that you've got to make it

1:00:09.080 --> 1:00:12.080
<v Speaker 12>better on the ground, as opposed to telling people, well,

1:00:12.120 --> 1:00:13.840
<v Speaker 12>you know, you can stick around, but really you ought

1:00:13.920 --> 1:00:16.040
<v Speaker 12>to go to ship out right.

1:00:15.960 --> 1:00:18.480
<v Speaker 1>Exactly, all right, Claudia, thank you so much for joining us.

1:00:18.480 --> 1:00:19.240
<v Speaker 1>Really appreciate it.

1:00:19.280 --> 1:00:21.680
<v Speaker 2>I wish I wish we had more time about you know,

1:00:21.720 --> 1:00:24.000
<v Speaker 2>I grew up at Grandville right Brandall, Ohio. I know,

1:00:24.320 --> 1:00:26.600
<v Speaker 2>I know Claudia went.

1:00:26.480 --> 1:00:28.720
<v Speaker 1>To Dennis Dennison. That's right. That makes it all come

1:00:28.760 --> 1:00:32.360
<v Speaker 1>home Claudia Soom, founder in independent e commerce for some consulting.

1:00:32.560 --> 1:00:35.680
<v Speaker 6>You're listening to the tape Cat's are Live program Bloomberg

1:00:35.760 --> 1:00:39.320
<v Speaker 6>Markets weekdays at ten am Eastern on Bloomberg Radio, the

1:00:39.400 --> 1:00:42.640
<v Speaker 6>tune in app, Bloomberg dot Com, and the Bloomberg Business App.

1:00:42.680 --> 1:00:45.480
<v Speaker 6>You can also listen live on Amazon Alexa from our

1:00:45.480 --> 1:00:51.520
<v Speaker 6>flagship New York station Just Say Alexa play Bloomberg eleven thirty.

1:00:51.720 --> 1:00:56.240
<v Speaker 1>Talking about central banks this week raising rates, the FED

1:00:56.280 --> 1:00:59.919
<v Speaker 1>and the ECB each raising by twenty five bases point.

1:01:00.480 --> 1:01:03.080
<v Speaker 1>And obviously that's been just maybe the end of what

1:01:03.120 --> 1:01:08.200
<v Speaker 1>has been an unbelievably stark increase in rates across the world,

1:01:08.200 --> 1:01:10.320
<v Speaker 1>including here, most notably here in the US. And what

1:01:10.360 --> 1:01:13.720
<v Speaker 1>does that mean for the real estate business. Well, we're

1:01:13.720 --> 1:01:15.280
<v Speaker 1>going to check in with Brad case. He's the chief

1:01:15.280 --> 1:01:19.520
<v Speaker 1>economist and director of research at middle Bird middle Bird Communities. Brad,

1:01:19.520 --> 1:01:21.600
<v Speaker 1>thanks so much for joining us here. I mean, I

1:01:21.640 --> 1:01:23.960
<v Speaker 1>don't know, I just took out a mortgage for a property,

1:01:24.000 --> 1:01:26.400
<v Speaker 1>but I kind of feel like I'm the exception rather

1:01:26.440 --> 1:01:28.760
<v Speaker 1>than the rule. And oh, by the way, I fully

1:01:28.760 --> 1:01:31.040
<v Speaker 1>plan on refinancing that bad boy in twelve to eighteen

1:01:31.040 --> 1:01:32.720
<v Speaker 1>months at materially lower rates.

1:01:32.720 --> 1:01:34.160
<v Speaker 2>But talk to us.

1:01:34.120 --> 1:01:37.400
<v Speaker 1>About kind of good luck, talk to us about kind

1:01:37.400 --> 1:01:39.120
<v Speaker 1>of what you're seeing in your business. Bread.

1:01:40.320 --> 1:01:43.120
<v Speaker 8>Well, what we're seeing in the commercial part of the

1:01:43.120 --> 1:01:46.520
<v Speaker 8>real estate market is is that financing is still available,

1:01:46.560 --> 1:01:49.240
<v Speaker 8>but it is a little bit harder to access. And

1:01:49.280 --> 1:01:54.480
<v Speaker 8>that's and that's not really a problem. You know, if

1:01:54.640 --> 1:02:00.000
<v Speaker 8>when there's concern about the banking system, when something makes

1:02:00.120 --> 1:02:02.880
<v Speaker 8>borrowing more difficult, whether it's the rise of interest rates,

1:02:03.000 --> 1:02:06.680
<v Speaker 8>or whether it's the concern about about the regional banks

1:02:06.680 --> 1:02:09.560
<v Speaker 8>that have that have gotten in trouble recently, you know

1:02:09.800 --> 1:02:12.240
<v Speaker 8>when when when that makes it harder to borrow money,

1:02:12.360 --> 1:02:15.280
<v Speaker 8>it's not everybody who fails who you know who has

1:02:15.360 --> 1:02:19.520
<v Speaker 8>difficulty accessing capital. It's the weakest projects. And so that's

1:02:19.560 --> 1:02:22.160
<v Speaker 8>that's why it doesn't really doesn't really bother me. It

1:02:22.200 --> 1:02:25.320
<v Speaker 8>makes us work harder to get financing for the projects

1:02:25.360 --> 1:02:27.360
<v Speaker 8>that we have that are really good projects. If you've

1:02:27.400 --> 1:02:30.480
<v Speaker 8>got a if you've got a development project, for example,

1:02:30.560 --> 1:02:33.680
<v Speaker 8>that makes sense only because the capital is easy to get,

1:02:34.080 --> 1:02:36.280
<v Speaker 8>then it doesn't really make sense. You don't really want

1:02:36.320 --> 1:02:39.120
<v Speaker 8>projects like that happening, as you know, on an economy

1:02:39.160 --> 1:02:42.480
<v Speaker 8>wide basis. So yes, it's harder to get financing, and

1:02:42.560 --> 1:02:43.960
<v Speaker 8>that's not really a problem.

1:02:44.320 --> 1:02:46.600
<v Speaker 2>So and the other thing is refinancing.

1:02:47.120 --> 1:02:47.240
<v Speaker 4>Uh.

1:02:47.520 --> 1:02:49.480
<v Speaker 2>You know, I think a lot of people hear what

1:02:49.520 --> 1:02:53.600
<v Speaker 2>you're saying and visualize a project getting started. But there

1:02:53.640 --> 1:02:56.240
<v Speaker 2>are a lot of refiles that need to happen out there,

1:02:56.880 --> 1:03:02.880
<v Speaker 2>and if they don't, asset values will dropped dramatically, won't they.

1:03:03.000 --> 1:03:06.280
<v Speaker 8>Oh yes, And I mean asset values have dropped already

1:03:06.280 --> 1:03:08.720
<v Speaker 8>over the past year, and I expect that there is

1:03:08.800 --> 1:03:12.280
<v Speaker 8>more to come. However, again, it's not that that all

1:03:12.320 --> 1:03:16.120
<v Speaker 8>asset values drop, It's that it's that average asset value drop,

1:03:16.120 --> 1:03:18.920
<v Speaker 8>which is to say, some projects that that you know

1:03:19.360 --> 1:03:21.600
<v Speaker 8>you've got to you've got a retail project where no

1:03:21.600 --> 1:03:23.640
<v Speaker 8>one really wants to shop, or you've got an office

1:03:23.640 --> 1:03:27.080
<v Speaker 8>project in a place where where there's not a lot

1:03:27.080 --> 1:03:32.160
<v Speaker 8>of office employment. It's going to be difficult to convince

1:03:33.200 --> 1:03:35.720
<v Speaker 8>your source of capital that they should that they should

1:03:35.760 --> 1:03:38.280
<v Speaker 8>refinance a loan that's coming due when you don't really

1:03:38.280 --> 1:03:42.800
<v Speaker 8>have the fundamentals to support continuing to pay make payments

1:03:42.840 --> 1:03:46.720
<v Speaker 8>on that debt. So so, uh, the pain of something

1:03:46.720 --> 1:03:49.960
<v Speaker 8>like that is not spread evenly at all. It's uh,

1:03:50.000 --> 1:03:52.040
<v Speaker 8>you know, other parts of the real estate market that

1:03:52.080 --> 1:03:54.840
<v Speaker 8>are just doing just fine. They are not going to

1:03:54.880 --> 1:03:58.960
<v Speaker 8>have have difficulty getting new financing to replace their existing loans.

1:03:59.800 --> 1:04:04.640
<v Speaker 1>Right, We're experiencing a lot of turmoil in the regional

1:04:04.680 --> 1:04:06.880
<v Speaker 1>banking space over the last four or five six weeks,

1:04:06.880 --> 1:04:09.160
<v Speaker 1>and it's really picked up steam again over the last

1:04:09.400 --> 1:04:11.920
<v Speaker 1>several days with some of these names really being taken

1:04:11.920 --> 1:04:14.600
<v Speaker 1>to the woodshed in terms of their stock price. From

1:04:14.640 --> 1:04:17.600
<v Speaker 1>your perspective, from your business perspective, how are you viewing

1:04:17.640 --> 1:04:18.240
<v Speaker 1>this development?

1:04:19.440 --> 1:04:21.920
<v Speaker 8>Well, it's a concern. But you know, if if you

1:04:22.280 --> 1:04:24.920
<v Speaker 8>if you use a lot of if you use debt frequently,

1:04:25.520 --> 1:04:28.480
<v Speaker 8>then what you have been doing is setting up a

1:04:28.600 --> 1:04:33.160
<v Speaker 8>range of options because for any any particular use of debt,

1:04:33.920 --> 1:04:36.480
<v Speaker 8>it may be that, you know, one source of capital

1:04:36.560 --> 1:04:39.080
<v Speaker 8>is just not looking to fund that kind of a

1:04:39.320 --> 1:04:41.920
<v Speaker 8>kind of a project or an acquisition or whatever it is.

1:04:42.320 --> 1:04:45.280
<v Speaker 8>And so you're lining up several sources of capital so

1:04:45.320 --> 1:04:47.040
<v Speaker 8>that when one one of them says, now we have

1:04:47.080 --> 1:04:50.200
<v Speaker 8>too much of that sort of work. Uh, then you

1:04:50.240 --> 1:04:52.840
<v Speaker 8>go to somebody else who says who says, yeah, we're

1:04:52.840 --> 1:04:55.480
<v Speaker 8>ready to ready to finance that, and so you know,

1:04:55.520 --> 1:04:58.840
<v Speaker 8>that's a that's a normal way of doing business. So

1:04:58.840 --> 1:05:04.200
<v Speaker 8>so there aren't there shouldn't be a situation where the

1:05:04.280 --> 1:05:08.160
<v Speaker 8>regional banks that are you know, that are having difficulty

1:05:08.280 --> 1:05:11.960
<v Speaker 8>are your only sources of capital. So so going forward,

1:05:12.000 --> 1:05:15.160
<v Speaker 8>we will see other sources of capital picking up the slack.

1:05:15.920 --> 1:05:18.040
<v Speaker 2>Did you. I mean, one thing I've been thinking about

1:05:18.160 --> 1:05:22.720
<v Speaker 2>is anyone who needs financing, Ay should have taken care

1:05:22.760 --> 1:05:26.320
<v Speaker 2>of it as he saw rates rising, you know.

1:05:26.720 --> 1:05:28.720
<v Speaker 1>But the Jersey is sure a state did not come

1:05:28.760 --> 1:05:29.680
<v Speaker 1>on the market when we're.

1:05:29.640 --> 1:05:32.440
<v Speaker 2>Okay, I'm not talking about you. I'm talking about Brad's business.

1:05:32.520 --> 1:05:37.400
<v Speaker 2>You know, people developing, you know, big businesses or you know,

1:05:37.640 --> 1:05:40.400
<v Speaker 2>even medium sized businesses should already have gone out there

1:05:40.560 --> 1:05:42.680
<v Speaker 2>or should be getting out there now. Brad, have you

1:05:42.720 --> 1:05:45.280
<v Speaker 2>have you at Middleburg community has already taken care of

1:05:45.320 --> 1:05:48.040
<v Speaker 2>your financing needs as you see, as you saw rates

1:05:48.040 --> 1:05:49.000
<v Speaker 2>coming higher and higher.

1:05:49.800 --> 1:05:53.360
<v Speaker 8>Well, there's always this process of looking at our pipeline

1:05:53.400 --> 1:05:55.160
<v Speaker 8>and making sure that we have the financing, the right

1:05:55.200 --> 1:05:58.160
<v Speaker 8>financing in place for all of the projects in the pipeline.

1:05:58.280 --> 1:06:01.120
<v Speaker 8>But yeah, it's very important to be looking forward and

1:06:01.200 --> 1:06:04.840
<v Speaker 8>anticipating issues like this. You can't you can't do it perfectly.

1:06:05.320 --> 1:06:08.160
<v Speaker 8>But if you look at what happened back back before

1:06:08.200 --> 1:06:10.640
<v Speaker 8>the liquidity crisis of two thousand and eight and two

1:06:10.640 --> 1:06:14.200
<v Speaker 8>thousand and nine, there were companies that anticipated that things

1:06:14.200 --> 1:06:16.200
<v Speaker 8>were going to be tighter. It doesn't mean they anticipated

1:06:16.400 --> 1:06:19.040
<v Speaker 8>a crisis, but they anticipated that things were going to

1:06:19.200 --> 1:06:23.160
<v Speaker 8>get more difficult, and they addressed that. You know, maybe

1:06:23.200 --> 1:06:28.560
<v Speaker 8>they refinanced some some borrowing before they had to, but

1:06:28.720 --> 1:06:31.200
<v Speaker 8>because they were concerned that they might be more difficult

1:06:31.240 --> 1:06:33.680
<v Speaker 8>going forward. And if you were one of the people

1:06:33.760 --> 1:06:36.920
<v Speaker 8>who who you know, looked forward, made it, made a guess,

1:06:36.960 --> 1:06:40.080
<v Speaker 8>made a pretty good guess, and acted on it, then

1:06:40.160 --> 1:06:43.640
<v Speaker 8>you came out of that crisis much more solid than

1:06:43.800 --> 1:06:46.200
<v Speaker 8>companies that, you know, just sort of let the market

1:06:46.280 --> 1:06:48.760
<v Speaker 8>happen to them. So, you know, what what we tried

1:06:48.800 --> 1:06:50.280
<v Speaker 8>to do is we try to do a better job

1:06:50.320 --> 1:06:54.600
<v Speaker 8>of than other than our competitors, of anticipating that kind

1:06:54.640 --> 1:06:57.400
<v Speaker 8>of development in the market and responding to it in

1:06:57.480 --> 1:07:00.800
<v Speaker 8>terms of when we're raising capital, how much raising capital,

1:07:00.840 --> 1:07:02.360
<v Speaker 8>and who we're raising it from.

1:07:02.480 --> 1:07:05.320
<v Speaker 1>And Brad, in terms of deploying that capital, are you

1:07:05.400 --> 1:07:08.200
<v Speaker 1>just building stuff down in Florida and Texas where everybody

1:07:08.200 --> 1:07:10.760
<v Speaker 1>seems to be going, Where where are you guys seeing

1:07:10.800 --> 1:07:12.560
<v Speaker 1>the opportunities you look several years ahead.

1:07:13.600 --> 1:07:17.000
<v Speaker 8>So we were so our our our area is basically

1:07:17.040 --> 1:07:22.200
<v Speaker 8>from Virginia to Texas, and yes, it includes includes Florida, Georgia,

1:07:22.200 --> 1:07:24.960
<v Speaker 8>and North Carolina, South Carolina, Alabama, Tennessee. You know, so

1:07:25.000 --> 1:07:27.400
<v Speaker 8>those are very good markets. But one of the things

1:07:27.400 --> 1:07:29.640
<v Speaker 8>that we pay very close attention to, of course, is

1:07:29.680 --> 1:07:31.600
<v Speaker 8>what other people are doing, because we don't want to

1:07:31.600 --> 1:07:34.440
<v Speaker 8>be building a new, a new rental housing community in

1:07:34.480 --> 1:07:37.440
<v Speaker 8>a place where there is too much construction. And fortunately

1:07:37.480 --> 1:07:38.880
<v Speaker 8>in that part of the market, you know, there is

1:07:38.920 --> 1:07:44.000
<v Speaker 8>still so much unmad demand. But we look market by

1:07:44.040 --> 1:07:47.640
<v Speaker 8>market and we say, we may say, all right, here's

1:07:47.640 --> 1:07:50.360
<v Speaker 8>a particular city that that you know, it looks terrific,

1:07:50.560 --> 1:07:53.720
<v Speaker 8>but look how much new supply is coming on online.

1:07:54.160 --> 1:07:57.240
<v Speaker 8>We don't want to be locked into a big development

1:07:57.680 --> 1:07:59.640
<v Speaker 8>that's coming online in the middle of you know, what

1:07:59.760 --> 1:08:02.120
<v Speaker 8>may be a softening of rent growth or or an

1:08:02.120 --> 1:08:04.840
<v Speaker 8>increase in vacancy, or it's because there's too much supply

1:08:04.920 --> 1:08:08.439
<v Speaker 8>coming along online. So yeah, we we we pay close

1:08:08.480 --> 1:08:11.120
<v Speaker 8>attention to it. And and again our goal is to

1:08:11.160 --> 1:08:13.000
<v Speaker 8>be a little bit better than our community, than our

1:08:13.040 --> 1:08:17.240
<v Speaker 8>competitors in terms of anticipating how much new supply there's

1:08:17.240 --> 1:08:19.120
<v Speaker 8>going to be, how much new demand there's going to be,

1:08:19.520 --> 1:08:22.360
<v Speaker 8>not just nationwide, but but in particular markets.

1:08:22.640 --> 1:08:25.280
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, it just seems like the regional aspect that I

1:08:25.280 --> 1:08:28.439
<v Speaker 1>guess it's pretty straightforward, and of the markets you're in,

1:08:29.680 --> 1:08:31.439
<v Speaker 1>I seem to be some of the higher growth areas.

1:08:31.600 --> 1:08:33.080
<v Speaker 1>What do you think about when you if you when

1:08:33.080 --> 1:08:35.880
<v Speaker 1>you think about going into uh A, is it who

1:08:35.920 --> 1:08:38.400
<v Speaker 1>are like, who are your competitors? Are there other builders

1:08:38.439 --> 1:08:41.799
<v Speaker 1>you're competing against, or are there other modes of living

1:08:41.800 --> 1:08:43.360
<v Speaker 1>that you kind of look at, or is it just

1:08:43.360 --> 1:08:45.960
<v Speaker 1>simply oh boy, our big competitor cross the street is

1:08:45.960 --> 1:08:48.400
<v Speaker 1>building a big property in this market. Let's let's stay

1:08:48.400 --> 1:08:50.040
<v Speaker 1>away from it now.

1:08:50.280 --> 1:08:52.240
<v Speaker 8>You know, we we are a full service company, so

1:08:52.320 --> 1:08:57.280
<v Speaker 8>we we we we build rental housing communities, we buy them,

1:08:57.880 --> 1:09:01.040
<v Speaker 8>we manage them, including sometimes manage for other people. So

1:09:01.080 --> 1:09:04.000
<v Speaker 8>we're looking at competitors on a whole range of the

1:09:04.360 --> 1:09:08.439
<v Speaker 8>uh you know, of parts of the business. But so

1:09:08.439 --> 1:09:10.240
<v Speaker 8>so part of what we're trying to do is to say,

1:09:10.240 --> 1:09:11.840
<v Speaker 8>all right, you know, right now it looks like a

1:09:11.840 --> 1:09:14.240
<v Speaker 8>really good time to develop. Let's, you know, let's make

1:09:14.240 --> 1:09:16.240
<v Speaker 8>sure that we have a good development pipeline, or at

1:09:16.280 --> 1:09:18.240
<v Speaker 8>a different time we may be saying, all right, development

1:09:18.320 --> 1:09:21.439
<v Speaker 8>is really not the best, you know, best place to

1:09:21.479 --> 1:09:25.560
<v Speaker 8>focus our efforts. You know, let's be thinking about acquiring properties.

1:09:25.600 --> 1:09:27.600
<v Speaker 8>And it has to do and there's a lot of

1:09:27.640 --> 1:09:31.960
<v Speaker 8>differences both by market and by segment of the rental

1:09:31.960 --> 1:09:35.200
<v Speaker 8>housing market. So, for example, we were among the earliest

1:09:35.200 --> 1:09:40.200
<v Speaker 8>in terms of the you know, building single family rental

1:09:40.240 --> 1:09:44.120
<v Speaker 8>housing communities. Uh, you know, because you know, the the

1:09:44.160 --> 1:09:47.519
<v Speaker 8>some of the single family rental housing is scattered site

1:09:47.560 --> 1:09:50.960
<v Speaker 8>and what we work on is a community with amenities

1:09:51.000 --> 1:09:55.840
<v Speaker 8>and it's sort of a professionally managed place to live

1:09:56.600 --> 1:09:59.280
<v Speaker 8>where instead of sharing a wall with your neighbor, you've

1:09:59.280 --> 1:10:02.200
<v Speaker 8>got your own four So we were a little bit

1:10:02.200 --> 1:10:05.160
<v Speaker 8>earlier than many of our competitors in terms of figuring

1:10:05.200 --> 1:10:06.960
<v Speaker 8>out that that's what a lot of people were gonna

1:10:07.000 --> 1:10:09.439
<v Speaker 8>want and what kind of house would work well for them.

1:10:09.560 --> 1:10:11.519
<v Speaker 1>All right, good stuff, Brad, thanks so much for taking

1:10:11.520 --> 1:10:14.040
<v Speaker 1>the time. We really appreciate talking about the real estate

1:10:14.080 --> 1:10:17.000
<v Speaker 1>biz and the economics of the real estate business. Brad

1:10:17.040 --> 1:10:19.720
<v Speaker 1>Case he's a chief economist and director of research at

1:10:19.880 --> 1:10:22.439
<v Speaker 1>Middelburg Community talking about kind of some of the real

1:10:22.520 --> 1:10:24.759
<v Speaker 1>estate opportunities around the country.

1:10:25.040 --> 1:10:28.160
<v Speaker 6>You're listening to the tape cans Are live program Bloomberg

1:10:28.200 --> 1:10:31.800
<v Speaker 6>Markets weekdays at ten am Eastern on Bloomberg Radio, the

1:10:31.840 --> 1:10:35.080
<v Speaker 6>tune in app, Bloomberg dot Com, and the Bloomberg Business App.

1:10:35.120 --> 1:10:37.960
<v Speaker 6>You can also listen live on Amazon Alexa from our

1:10:37.960 --> 1:10:42.360
<v Speaker 6>flagship New York station. Just say Alexa play Bloomberg eleven thirty.

1:10:43.920 --> 1:10:47.479
<v Speaker 1>We'll talk about cross currents. We got earnings coming at

1:10:47.560 --> 1:10:50.519
<v Speaker 1>us seemingly left right and center this week. It's been

1:10:50.520 --> 1:10:52.799
<v Speaker 1>a busy week. We've got the FED and the ECB

1:10:53.200 --> 1:10:55.799
<v Speaker 1>raising rates, maybe gonna pause, we have to pay attention

1:10:55.840 --> 1:10:58.840
<v Speaker 1>to that. We've got some uncertain yet of Washington over

1:10:58.880 --> 1:11:01.680
<v Speaker 1>this whole debt ceiling thing. And then if that's not enough,

1:11:01.720 --> 1:11:05.280
<v Speaker 1>throw in some real concerns brewing in this marketplace about

1:11:05.400 --> 1:11:07.439
<v Speaker 1>some of the banks in the United States. So how's

1:11:07.479 --> 1:11:10.559
<v Speaker 1>a professional suppost to deal with that? Well, fortunately, we

1:11:10.600 --> 1:11:12.160
<v Speaker 1>have one that has a lot of perspective, a lot

1:11:12.160 --> 1:11:15.759
<v Speaker 1>of experience. Margy Pateel, Senior portfolio manage at all Spring

1:11:15.880 --> 1:11:18.759
<v Speaker 1>Global Investments, joins us. Margy, I'd like to to start

1:11:18.800 --> 1:11:21.400
<v Speaker 1>with kind of what we've been experiencing really over the

1:11:21.479 --> 1:11:22.880
<v Speaker 1>last couple of days, but over the last four or

1:11:22.880 --> 1:11:26.280
<v Speaker 1>five weeks with some of these regional banks. How concerned

1:11:26.320 --> 1:11:28.880
<v Speaker 1>are you that this is something systemic that could be

1:11:28.880 --> 1:11:29.959
<v Speaker 1>a problem for the economy.

1:11:30.880 --> 1:11:34.320
<v Speaker 9>Well, it definitely is, and I would say in almost

1:11:34.400 --> 1:11:38.200
<v Speaker 9>all cases, the banks really weren't doing anything wrong. They

1:11:38.240 --> 1:11:42.080
<v Speaker 9>simply structured their balance sheets according to zero rates and

1:11:42.120 --> 1:11:45.599
<v Speaker 9>simply couldn't adjust for a five point increase in short

1:11:45.680 --> 1:11:48.800
<v Speaker 9>rates in a year. So I think that the fragility

1:11:48.800 --> 1:11:51.800
<v Speaker 9>that we're seeing is really caused by FED actions, and

1:11:51.840 --> 1:11:55.479
<v Speaker 9>the FED scenes rather immune to the damage they're causing.

1:11:55.680 --> 1:11:57.640
<v Speaker 1>And we haven't heard that in the comments from Jay

1:11:57.720 --> 1:12:00.960
<v Speaker 1>Powell yesterday that whereas the banking system, his estimation is

1:12:01.000 --> 1:12:03.600
<v Speaker 1>pretty sound. Where do you think we are with this

1:12:03.640 --> 1:12:06.679
<v Speaker 1>Federal Reserve? And do you think that they are pausing

1:12:06.760 --> 1:12:08.920
<v Speaker 1>to risk or is there a chance that they may

1:12:08.960 --> 1:12:11.200
<v Speaker 1>be cut in the face of what could be some

1:12:11.680 --> 1:12:14.120
<v Speaker 1>challenges in economy stemming apart from the banks.

1:12:14.600 --> 1:12:16.800
<v Speaker 9>Well, it seems to me they are so focused on

1:12:16.880 --> 1:12:21.000
<v Speaker 9>bringing down the inflation rate that they're really losing track

1:12:21.040 --> 1:12:23.680
<v Speaker 9>of what's going on in the real economy, particularly in

1:12:23.680 --> 1:12:26.559
<v Speaker 9>the financial sector. We're we're seeing lots of stress, again

1:12:26.680 --> 1:12:30.040
<v Speaker 9>precipitated by Fred actions and really looking at his comments,

1:12:30.040 --> 1:12:33.479
<v Speaker 9>he was really rather high handed about what happens to banks,

1:12:33.520 --> 1:12:35.559
<v Speaker 9>and oh, well, if we have a number of banks

1:12:35.600 --> 1:12:38.639
<v Speaker 9>continue to shrink, then that's just the way it goes,

1:12:39.080 --> 1:12:41.800
<v Speaker 9>rather than looking at how much of that is really

1:12:41.960 --> 1:12:44.800
<v Speaker 9>due to what the Fed has done to limit them.

1:12:44.840 --> 1:12:46.919
<v Speaker 9>So we think that there is something to be concerned

1:12:46.960 --> 1:12:49.800
<v Speaker 9>about because the Fed, just the FED doesn't seem very

1:12:49.840 --> 1:12:53.080
<v Speaker 9>concerned about the financial system. They're looking at the inflation

1:12:53.240 --> 1:12:56.040
<v Speaker 9>rate and so that's why they think the course is

1:12:56.080 --> 1:12:58.519
<v Speaker 9>still steady and they're missing the bigger picture.

1:12:58.960 --> 1:13:02.240
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, is that comes back to bite them In terms

1:13:02.280 --> 1:13:05.400
<v Speaker 1>of earnings, Margie, we're about eighty percent through I guess

1:13:05.400 --> 1:13:07.800
<v Speaker 1>the S and P five hundred reporting, and the good

1:13:07.840 --> 1:13:10.160
<v Speaker 1>news is there was some revenue growth close to four percent,

1:13:10.200 --> 1:13:12.920
<v Speaker 1>but the earnings growth a negative three percent, indicating some

1:13:12.960 --> 1:13:16.400
<v Speaker 1>real margin pressure out there. What's your takeaway from this

1:13:16.439 --> 1:13:19.040
<v Speaker 1>earning season so far and maybe what that means to

1:13:19.520 --> 1:13:20.520
<v Speaker 1>your sense of evaluation.

1:13:21.600 --> 1:13:25.759
<v Speaker 9>Well, just like the fourth quarter surprised by better results

1:13:25.800 --> 1:13:28.759
<v Speaker 9>than we expected, the first quarter has actually been better

1:13:28.800 --> 1:13:31.639
<v Speaker 9>than the market expected. It's true we're starting to see

1:13:31.680 --> 1:13:34.960
<v Speaker 9>some pressure on revenue growth, and we're also seeing some

1:13:35.080 --> 1:13:38.759
<v Speaker 9>pressure on earnings, but it's been less than the market expected,

1:13:38.800 --> 1:13:42.280
<v Speaker 9>and it shows companies so far have held up pretty well. However,

1:13:42.720 --> 1:13:45.439
<v Speaker 9>I think the question is what we're seeing in some

1:13:45.520 --> 1:13:48.720
<v Speaker 9>of the companies that are disappointing is really telegraphing that

1:13:48.760 --> 1:13:51.720
<v Speaker 9>we may see a much more sharp deterioration as we

1:13:51.800 --> 1:13:53.799
<v Speaker 9>go into the next few quarters.

1:13:54.439 --> 1:13:56.840
<v Speaker 1>So are you are you baking into your outlook an

1:13:56.840 --> 1:13:59.439
<v Speaker 1>outright recession and if so, kind of what duration.

1:14:01.479 --> 1:14:04.080
<v Speaker 9>I'd like to think we could avoid a recession. But honestly,

1:14:04.120 --> 1:14:07.000
<v Speaker 9>when you look at the signs that we're seeing bank

1:14:07.080 --> 1:14:12.519
<v Speaker 9>lending officers becoming more conservative, we've seen hiring statistics really

1:14:12.640 --> 1:14:16.719
<v Speaker 9>roll over, and we've seen signs that consumers are starting

1:14:16.720 --> 1:14:20.000
<v Speaker 9>to feel a little stressed, especially in the lower chier consumers.

1:14:20.280 --> 1:14:23.280
<v Speaker 9>So we think that we rather suddenly are seeing some

1:14:23.320 --> 1:14:26.719
<v Speaker 9>pressure on the economy. Plus a lot of the things

1:14:26.720 --> 1:14:29.280
<v Speaker 9>that make the economy look good are going to go away.

1:14:29.320 --> 1:14:31.720
<v Speaker 9>For example, if student loans come back to start to

1:14:31.720 --> 1:14:34.360
<v Speaker 9>take a bite out of income. And also many state

1:14:34.400 --> 1:14:37.040
<v Speaker 9>and local governments have been spending their COVID money. That's

1:14:37.040 --> 1:14:41.679
<v Speaker 9>why construction by public entities has hauled up so well,

1:14:41.960 --> 1:14:43.479
<v Speaker 9>so that's going to come to an end. So we

1:14:43.520 --> 1:14:46.559
<v Speaker 9>may sort of go off more of a cliff than

1:14:46.560 --> 1:14:48.120
<v Speaker 9>we see right here in the first quarter.

1:14:48.439 --> 1:14:51.519
<v Speaker 1>All right, given all those cross currents, if you will,

1:14:51.560 --> 1:14:54.160
<v Speaker 1>and maybe even some headways out there, what are some

1:14:54.200 --> 1:14:57.479
<v Speaker 1>of the sectors that you guys are still find attractive.

1:14:57.520 --> 1:14:58.639
<v Speaker 1>You might be doing some work.

1:14:58.479 --> 1:15:02.679
<v Speaker 9>In well thinking and that basically everybody over the next

1:15:02.680 --> 1:15:06.439
<v Speaker 9>few quarters is going to have disappointing earnings compared to

1:15:06.479 --> 1:15:09.519
<v Speaker 9>what we're seeing today. We still like the technology sector,

1:15:09.880 --> 1:15:13.559
<v Speaker 9>especially semiconductors. We think they're working through their inventory issues.

1:15:14.000 --> 1:15:17.800
<v Speaker 9>They're well understood the inventory, and we expect to see

1:15:17.840 --> 1:15:21.120
<v Speaker 9>long term growth there. We like the industrial sectors because

1:15:21.120 --> 1:15:25.120
<v Speaker 9>we do believe that the reshoring and the increased capital

1:15:25.160 --> 1:15:28.840
<v Speaker 9>expenditure is going to increase. And selectively, we like part

1:15:28.880 --> 1:15:31.600
<v Speaker 9>of healthcare. We think that companies that can innovate and

1:15:31.680 --> 1:15:36.200
<v Speaker 9>avoid some of the price pressures of the drugs coming

1:15:36.240 --> 1:15:38.920
<v Speaker 9>off patent will still have a sustainable growth path, and

1:15:38.960 --> 1:15:40.920
<v Speaker 9>companies that have good balance sheets in case we do

1:15:40.960 --> 1:15:42.200
<v Speaker 9>have real financial stress.

1:15:42.600 --> 1:15:45.439
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, it's interesting on the tech side. You know, I

1:15:45.479 --> 1:15:47.320
<v Speaker 1>don't know, I guess all I know are what I

1:15:47.360 --> 1:15:49.400
<v Speaker 1>really know about that the chip business is Boy, it's

1:15:49.479 --> 1:15:52.719
<v Speaker 1>long cycle, and you better really get the cycle right.

1:15:53.840 --> 1:15:57.120
<v Speaker 1>So do you see demand picking up for chips in

1:15:57.120 --> 1:15:58.040
<v Speaker 1>the back half of this year?

1:15:58.840 --> 1:16:00.679
<v Speaker 9>Well, we're thinking in the back half of the year

1:16:00.720 --> 1:16:04.519
<v Speaker 9>that we should see the excess inventory be largely worked

1:16:04.560 --> 1:16:08.120
<v Speaker 9>off and then looking for a pickup and demand as

1:16:08.160 --> 1:16:11.000
<v Speaker 9>we get in the second half. And if we see

1:16:11.000 --> 1:16:13.320
<v Speaker 9>more pressure on the economy, we may have to push

1:16:13.360 --> 1:16:15.840
<v Speaker 9>that out a bit. But at this point that's our thinking.

1:16:16.200 --> 1:16:19.320
<v Speaker 1>And on this the restoring issue that was certainly a

1:16:19.479 --> 1:16:22.000
<v Speaker 1>very really hot topic during the beginning of the pandemic

1:16:22.000 --> 1:16:25.040
<v Speaker 1>when some of these supply chain issues became really apparent,

1:16:25.120 --> 1:16:27.599
<v Speaker 1>including chips, and you know, we say, boy, we got

1:16:27.600 --> 1:16:29.640
<v Speaker 1>to start restoring some of the stuff, and I know

1:16:29.720 --> 1:16:32.400
<v Speaker 1>the rhetoric was hot and heavy at the time. Have

1:16:32.479 --> 1:16:36.720
<v Speaker 1>we actually seen businesses across you know, sectors really start

1:16:36.840 --> 1:16:38.080
<v Speaker 1>to reshore some of this stuff.

1:16:38.720 --> 1:16:40.960
<v Speaker 9>Yes, we have, of course at the margin, it's still

1:16:41.000 --> 1:16:44.560
<v Speaker 9>a small part of the economy. We've also seen companies

1:16:44.680 --> 1:16:47.280
<v Speaker 9>move to, if not in the United States, close to

1:16:47.360 --> 1:16:50.280
<v Speaker 9>the United States, save Mexico for an example.

1:16:50.000 --> 1:16:52.080
<v Speaker 1>Right, friendshuring, I guess is what they tell about.

1:16:52.400 --> 1:16:56.120
<v Speaker 9>Yes, to make those but we think that's a permanent change,

1:16:56.160 --> 1:16:59.640
<v Speaker 9>a permanent swing away from particularly sourcing from China. We

1:16:59.640 --> 1:17:01.120
<v Speaker 9>don't think that's going to be reversed.

1:17:01.840 --> 1:17:04.360
<v Speaker 1>And it's interesting in the healthcare space, you know, we've

1:17:04.360 --> 1:17:07.360
<v Speaker 1>seen some deals happening and that always seems to be

1:17:07.439 --> 1:17:10.320
<v Speaker 1>kind of a merger Monday on the pharmacy space, and

1:17:10.400 --> 1:17:13.760
<v Speaker 1>is that when you invest in healthcare do you try

1:17:13.800 --> 1:17:16.160
<v Speaker 1>to keep that in mind? Do you ignore that or

1:17:16.160 --> 1:17:17.960
<v Speaker 1>do you just stay with some of the bigger names

1:17:18.000 --> 1:17:21.040
<v Speaker 1>that kind of give you a broad diversification diversification in

1:17:21.080 --> 1:17:21.479
<v Speaker 1>the space.

1:17:21.760 --> 1:17:23.960
<v Speaker 9>Yes, we try to stay with the larger names that

1:17:24.080 --> 1:17:28.040
<v Speaker 9>have good cash flow, that are diversified said that won't

1:17:28.080 --> 1:17:32.200
<v Speaker 9>be hurt by fall off in anyone product. And rather

1:17:32.240 --> 1:17:35.559
<v Speaker 9>than looking for companies that might be acquired, we think

1:17:35.600 --> 1:17:38.599
<v Speaker 9>good companies or the companies that eventually get acquired, and

1:17:38.640 --> 1:17:41.479
<v Speaker 9>so we're looking for companies that can have sustainable cash

1:17:41.479 --> 1:17:43.559
<v Speaker 9>flow through what might turn out to be a more

1:17:43.640 --> 1:17:45.400
<v Speaker 9>difficult period than we're thinking right now.

1:17:45.680 --> 1:17:48.080
<v Speaker 1>Right yep, absolutely, all right, Margie, thank you so much.

1:17:48.280 --> 1:17:51.800
<v Speaker 1>We appreciate getting your time as always. Argy Btel, she's

1:17:51.800 --> 1:17:55.600
<v Speaker 1>a senior portfolio manager, Offspring Global Investments.

1:17:58.960 --> 1:18:02.040
<v Speaker 2>Thanks for listening to the bloom Markets podcasts. You can

1:18:02.080 --> 1:18:05.839
<v Speaker 2>subscribe and listen to interviews at Apple Podcasts or whatever

1:18:05.920 --> 1:18:09.639
<v Speaker 2>podcast platform you prefer. I'm Matt Miller. I'm on Twitter

1:18:09.880 --> 1:18:11.800
<v Speaker 2>at Matt Miller nineteen seventy three.

1:18:12.240 --> 1:18:14.599
<v Speaker 1>And I'm Faull Sweeney. I'm on Twitter at pt Sweeney.

1:18:14.720 --> 1:18:17.400
<v Speaker 1>Before the podcast, you can always catch us worldwide at

1:18:17.400 --> 1:18:20.000
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg Radio