WEBVTT - Surveillance: Weak Jobs Report

0:00:09.880 --> 0:00:13.800
<v Speaker 1>Welcome to the Bloomberg Surveillance Podcast. I'm Tom Keane Jai Ley.

0:00:13.960 --> 0:00:17.560
<v Speaker 1>We bring you insight from the best in economics, finance, investment,

0:00:18.000 --> 0:00:23.520
<v Speaker 1>and international relations. Find Bloomberg Surveillance on Apple Podcasts, SoundCloud,

0:00:23.600 --> 0:00:27.520
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg dot com, and of course on the Bloomberg. The

0:00:27.720 --> 0:00:31.320
<v Speaker 1>first loss in jobs for an entire month since April,

0:00:31.360 --> 0:00:34.680
<v Speaker 1>we are seeing the second wave of job losses, the

0:00:34.720 --> 0:00:38.200
<v Speaker 1>second wave of the coronavirus, and the second wave of pain,

0:00:38.280 --> 0:00:42.000
<v Speaker 1>hopefully jerking Congress into more action. At least that's the

0:00:42.000 --> 0:00:46.400
<v Speaker 1>implication from Marcus Jeffrey Rosenberg Blackport black Rock, portfolio manager

0:00:46.400 --> 0:00:49.960
<v Speaker 1>of the Systematic Multi Strategy Fund, joining us right now.

0:00:50.320 --> 0:00:52.920
<v Speaker 1>Your thoughts, Jeff on this report, Yeah, I think you

0:00:52.960 --> 0:00:55.080
<v Speaker 1>guys have it exactly right. You look at that market

0:00:55.120 --> 0:00:58.400
<v Speaker 1>reaction and you see slightly higher yields on what is

0:00:58.400 --> 0:01:02.120
<v Speaker 1>a very disappointing board. And it's really about looking through

0:01:02.160 --> 0:01:05.480
<v Speaker 1>this report to its implications for monitors for fiscal policy.

0:01:05.880 --> 0:01:09.000
<v Speaker 1>And yes, you know, fiscal policy expectations were high. This

0:01:09.080 --> 0:01:14.040
<v Speaker 1>report just underscores the likelihood that will see significant additional

0:01:14.200 --> 0:01:18.000
<v Speaker 1>fiscal stimulus in the new administration from the new administration,

0:01:18.040 --> 0:01:20.200
<v Speaker 1>from the new Congress, and that's why you're seeing a

0:01:20.200 --> 0:01:23.240
<v Speaker 1>little bit higher yields. You know, the report is remarkably

0:01:23.319 --> 0:01:26.880
<v Speaker 1>weak with regards to leisure and hospitality, down a five

0:01:27.280 --> 0:01:30.080
<v Speaker 1>thousand jobs. That's really what's taking the headline number down.

0:01:30.319 --> 0:01:34.880
<v Speaker 1>And that's just very clearly about the COVID resurgence here

0:01:34.880 --> 0:01:37.440
<v Speaker 1>that we're seeing, and that's just underscoring again the need

0:01:37.480 --> 0:01:39.919
<v Speaker 1>for more fiscal policy. So it's a it's a very

0:01:40.040 --> 0:01:42.920
<v Speaker 1>kind of different bond market reaction, but but I think

0:01:42.920 --> 0:01:45.480
<v Speaker 1>it makes a lot of sense that we're looking past

0:01:45.720 --> 0:01:48.880
<v Speaker 1>the near term weakness towards the policy response and that

0:01:48.920 --> 0:01:52.440
<v Speaker 1>means better growth and and higher rates. And that's really

0:01:52.520 --> 0:01:54.880
<v Speaker 1>higher rates and steeper curve that's been a trend. I

0:01:54.920 --> 0:01:57.120
<v Speaker 1>don't think this report is going to take us off

0:01:57.160 --> 0:02:00.480
<v Speaker 1>that trend. Futures up, nine, futures up, a little bit

0:02:00.480 --> 0:02:03.640
<v Speaker 1>of an ease back inequities at this moment. Jeff Rosenberg,

0:02:03.680 --> 0:02:05.560
<v Speaker 1>I know at Carnegie mel And you took Horse and

0:02:05.720 --> 0:02:09.679
<v Speaker 1>Cart two oh two an important course. The research this

0:02:09.800 --> 0:02:15.320
<v Speaker 1>morning is extraordinary about inflation expectations and how they fold

0:02:15.360 --> 0:02:19.959
<v Speaker 1>into the yield market, about oil surging, about a weaker

0:02:20.080 --> 0:02:23.000
<v Speaker 1>dollar and the presumption of a weekend dollar, which is

0:02:23.040 --> 0:02:27.320
<v Speaker 1>the horse and which is the cart real world dynamics

0:02:27.400 --> 0:02:32.359
<v Speaker 1>like dollar in oil or is it the fixed income market? Well,

0:02:32.160 --> 0:02:34.680
<v Speaker 1>the first of all on on on oil that's going

0:02:34.720 --> 0:02:39.400
<v Speaker 1>to affect the headline levels of inflation markets and longer

0:02:39.520 --> 0:02:42.760
<v Speaker 1>term inflation expectations are really gonna focus on on core. Now.

0:02:42.800 --> 0:02:45.680
<v Speaker 1>The expectations here and the developments are really about a

0:02:45.720 --> 0:02:50.440
<v Speaker 1>reflationary trade rolling through the fixed income markets. You see

0:02:50.480 --> 0:02:54.000
<v Speaker 1>it in terms of market based measures of inflation tips,

0:02:54.040 --> 0:02:58.280
<v Speaker 1>break even measures breaking out to the upside. You see

0:02:58.280 --> 0:03:00.600
<v Speaker 1>it in phenomena yield measures, and see it in the

0:03:00.639 --> 0:03:04.680
<v Speaker 1>steepening of the yield curve. The overall conclusion here is

0:03:05.040 --> 0:03:11.079
<v Speaker 1>expectations for significant monetary and fiscal policy coordination to deliver

0:03:11.360 --> 0:03:15.440
<v Speaker 1>a reflationary thrust to the economy that then flows through

0:03:15.560 --> 0:03:19.560
<v Speaker 1>into financial markets. But it starts with financial markets expectations,

0:03:19.560 --> 0:03:22.400
<v Speaker 1>and that's what you're seeing building. It's been building for

0:03:22.480 --> 0:03:26.840
<v Speaker 1>some time. It's certainly got some acceleration hosts the Georgia

0:03:27.200 --> 0:03:31.079
<v Speaker 1>runoff election results and certainly today UH and this negative

0:03:31.120 --> 0:03:34.120
<v Speaker 1>news is going to be looked through to its implications

0:03:34.160 --> 0:03:37.600
<v Speaker 1>to further the reflationary fiscal policy response. You know, I

0:03:37.600 --> 0:03:40.480
<v Speaker 1>don't want to read too much into the immediate market response,

0:03:40.520 --> 0:03:42.480
<v Speaker 1>but I do think it's interesting, Jeff, that you see

0:03:42.480 --> 0:03:44.920
<v Speaker 1>the bond market reacting more than the equity markets, That

0:03:45.000 --> 0:03:47.800
<v Speaker 1>equities actually took a little bit of a dip in

0:03:47.840 --> 0:03:51.520
<v Speaker 1>futures trading, whereas you saw bonds take a definitive move

0:03:51.840 --> 0:03:55.920
<v Speaker 1>price lower, yield higher on the expectation of stimulus. Have

0:03:56.000 --> 0:03:59.920
<v Speaker 1>we reached a point where higher yields with such a

0:04:00.120 --> 0:04:03.880
<v Speaker 1>lagging economy on the in the backdrop, becomes a headwind

0:04:03.880 --> 0:04:07.000
<v Speaker 1>for stocks. In other words, it sort of threatens the

0:04:07.000 --> 0:04:10.160
<v Speaker 1>thesis of going into stocks at such high valuation simply

0:04:10.400 --> 0:04:14.120
<v Speaker 1>because there is no alternative. Jeff, It's it's a great question.

0:04:14.480 --> 0:04:16.560
<v Speaker 1>I don't think we're there yet. You've got to take

0:04:16.560 --> 0:04:19.440
<v Speaker 1>a step back from these changes in in yield levels

0:04:19.480 --> 0:04:23.440
<v Speaker 1>that you know, from an environment where yields were exceptionally depressed,

0:04:23.480 --> 0:04:25.800
<v Speaker 1>and certainly when we think about the tenure yield being

0:04:25.800 --> 0:04:30.000
<v Speaker 1>significantly below one percent throughout the post COVID environment, you

0:04:30.040 --> 0:04:33.880
<v Speaker 1>know we've recently breached that level, but these yields are

0:04:33.920 --> 0:04:37.800
<v Speaker 1>still exceptionally low out the yield curve, and the FED

0:04:37.960 --> 0:04:40.479
<v Speaker 1>is telling you they're happy to see that now, they're

0:04:40.480 --> 0:04:43.360
<v Speaker 1>not going to be happy to see a disruptive increase

0:04:43.400 --> 0:04:47.200
<v Speaker 1>in interest rates basis points higher on the day. But

0:04:47.279 --> 0:04:49.640
<v Speaker 1>you look at all of the forecast for the year

0:04:49.720 --> 0:04:52.480
<v Speaker 1>and they center around twenty basis points for the year.

0:04:52.920 --> 0:04:59.560
<v Speaker 1>That's fine in terms of fiscal stimulus boosting market expectations

0:04:59.560 --> 0:05:04.120
<v Speaker 1>without the market expectations on doing the financial stability that

0:05:04.240 --> 0:05:06.800
<v Speaker 1>the FED is targeting here. So I think if we

0:05:06.880 --> 0:05:09.960
<v Speaker 1>have these kind of gradual increases in rates, that's not

0:05:09.960 --> 0:05:12.640
<v Speaker 1>going to get in the way of financial stability and

0:05:12.680 --> 0:05:15.320
<v Speaker 1>having to have the FED intervene. Jeff Rosenberg where this

0:05:15.400 --> 0:05:18.000
<v Speaker 1>is black Rock, and also Michael McKee of Bloomberg with

0:05:18.040 --> 0:05:20.719
<v Speaker 1>his wonderful analysis. He says, some time to dive into

0:05:20.720 --> 0:05:24.039
<v Speaker 1>the report. Jeff Rosenberg, Michael McKee mentioned the five hundred

0:05:24.120 --> 0:05:27.400
<v Speaker 1>thousand statistics on bars and restaurants. I think no surprise

0:05:27.480 --> 0:05:30.719
<v Speaker 1>to anyone in New York. Michael McKee, Can you extrapolate

0:05:30.839 --> 0:05:36.280
<v Speaker 1>anyway to the early February report, early February next month

0:05:36.400 --> 0:05:40.840
<v Speaker 1>or a year as January? Can you get January are

0:05:40.960 --> 0:05:44.440
<v Speaker 1>right now? In a sense you can, because it doesn't

0:05:44.440 --> 0:05:47.920
<v Speaker 1>look like any of the lockdown situation has changed and

0:05:48.279 --> 0:05:51.520
<v Speaker 1>as a matter of fact, we're seeing more cases, more

0:05:51.600 --> 0:05:55.040
<v Speaker 1>deaths every day, we're setting records, So it looks like

0:05:55.080 --> 0:05:57.400
<v Speaker 1>we're gonna be perhaps even in worse shape. A lot

0:05:57.440 --> 0:05:59.919
<v Speaker 1>of what happened in December came about in the early

0:06:00.040 --> 0:06:03.280
<v Speaker 1>part of the month UH and the survey has taken

0:06:03.320 --> 0:06:05.880
<v Speaker 1>the week of the that includes the twelfth of the month,

0:06:05.960 --> 0:06:09.480
<v Speaker 1>So at the twelfth of the month in UH in

0:06:10.000 --> 0:06:12.560
<v Speaker 1>January is not looking good right now, and so I

0:06:12.560 --> 0:06:16.880
<v Speaker 1>would imagine that we will not see any additional hiring. However,

0:06:17.760 --> 0:06:19.920
<v Speaker 1>I have people already lost their jobs. That's going to

0:06:20.000 --> 0:06:22.600
<v Speaker 1>be the question if if we lost so many in December,

0:06:22.880 --> 0:06:25.320
<v Speaker 1>do we see a significant number of people who go

0:06:25.440 --> 0:06:28.160
<v Speaker 1>off payrolls or are they just remaining off payrolls. So

0:06:28.320 --> 0:06:30.159
<v Speaker 1>let's just hie us all together and just sort of

0:06:30.240 --> 0:06:33.680
<v Speaker 1>highlight how a pivotal week this really has been, how

0:06:33.680 --> 0:06:38.600
<v Speaker 1>an exceptional start to a year following an unprecedented and

0:06:38.680 --> 0:06:42.200
<v Speaker 1>Jeff Rosenberg we started this segment talking about how people

0:06:42.200 --> 0:06:44.880
<v Speaker 1>have had to rewrite their year, had THECES in the

0:06:44.920 --> 0:06:48.120
<v Speaker 1>past week after just writing them days earlier, after what

0:06:48.240 --> 0:06:51.359
<v Speaker 1>happened with the Georgia election, and given what we're seeing

0:06:51.360 --> 0:06:54.240
<v Speaker 1>with the surprise now with a labor market that is

0:06:54.320 --> 0:06:57.960
<v Speaker 1>much weaker than many had expected. Jeff, are you changing

0:06:58.120 --> 0:07:03.279
<v Speaker 1>any of your sees based on the week's action. Well,

0:07:03.320 --> 0:07:05.800
<v Speaker 1>you know, I don't think that. The thing that has

0:07:05.880 --> 0:07:08.000
<v Speaker 1>happened in the over the course of the week is

0:07:08.040 --> 0:07:12.560
<v Speaker 1>the expectations were already going into the year that growth

0:07:12.600 --> 0:07:15.440
<v Speaker 1>would be better than expected, and so the Georgia elections

0:07:15.440 --> 0:07:18.880
<v Speaker 1>have only added to the confidence that market participants have

0:07:19.080 --> 0:07:23.320
<v Speaker 1>that growth due to fiscal policy support will be better

0:07:23.360 --> 0:07:26.440
<v Speaker 1>than expected. And that's that's providing some cushion, that's providing

0:07:26.800 --> 0:07:31.360
<v Speaker 1>some safety net to the positive sentiment around financial markets

0:07:31.360 --> 0:07:33.680
<v Speaker 1>and for the bond market for the expectations that yields

0:07:33.680 --> 0:07:36.360
<v Speaker 1>will continue to gradually rise. So I don't think we're

0:07:36.360 --> 0:07:39.200
<v Speaker 1>seeing a significant change from that. I think we're seeing

0:07:39.200 --> 0:07:43.440
<v Speaker 1>it reinforced with today's news and with the news on

0:07:43.480 --> 0:07:46.600
<v Speaker 1>the elections in the outlook for fiscal policy. Jeffrey Rosenberg,

0:07:46.640 --> 0:07:49.760
<v Speaker 1>thank you so much. With Blackbrook, greatly appreciate your time

0:07:49.800 --> 0:07:51.640
<v Speaker 1>with us on this job's report, and of course are

0:07:51.680 --> 0:08:01.080
<v Speaker 1>FED meetings as well, string of PLOSO for the discussion.

0:08:01.120 --> 0:08:03.800
<v Speaker 1>It will be an eventful Friday. The resignations of the

0:08:03.880 --> 0:08:08.240
<v Speaker 1>Secretary of Transportation, the Secretary of Education. This morning, we

0:08:08.320 --> 0:08:11.760
<v Speaker 1>were resigned to speak to french Kill, the Republican from Arkansas,

0:08:12.080 --> 0:08:14.360
<v Speaker 1>French Hill of Little Rock, and of course has been

0:08:14.400 --> 0:08:19.000
<v Speaker 1>a consistent Republican voice giving us conversation on Bloomberg surveillance.

0:08:19.320 --> 0:08:22.480
<v Speaker 1>Congressmanni Hill. There seems to be a divide, as we

0:08:22.560 --> 0:08:26.240
<v Speaker 1>just saw from Senator Sass of Nebraska the language at

0:08:26.240 --> 0:08:29.480
<v Speaker 1>the Senator from Nebraska used as compared to the Senator

0:08:29.480 --> 0:08:34.199
<v Speaker 1>from Missouri Holly and the Senator from Texas Uh Ted Cruz.

0:08:34.600 --> 0:08:38.400
<v Speaker 1>How do you bring together a Republican party to be

0:08:38.520 --> 0:08:43.080
<v Speaker 1>in minority with President Biden. Well, happy new year, Tom,

0:08:43.160 --> 0:08:46.000
<v Speaker 1>thanks for having me. This is a critical issue and

0:08:46.080 --> 0:08:48.640
<v Speaker 1>at this moment in American district, I think all the

0:08:48.760 --> 0:08:51.240
<v Speaker 1>leaders in boat parties, on both sides of the Capitol

0:08:51.360 --> 0:08:54.640
<v Speaker 1>and on both sides of the aisle need to focus

0:08:54.679 --> 0:08:59.080
<v Speaker 1>on our peaceful transfer of the presidency on noon January

0:08:59.400 --> 0:09:01.920
<v Speaker 1>and we need to and not add to the brinksmanship

0:09:02.040 --> 0:09:05.640
<v Speaker 1>that we've seen from Speaker Pelosi in the last day

0:09:05.679 --> 0:09:09.000
<v Speaker 1>on the amendment, or that we saw from Senator Cruz

0:09:09.120 --> 0:09:13.640
<v Speaker 1>or Senator Holly on this uh false narrative that somehow

0:09:13.679 --> 0:09:16.880
<v Speaker 1>we're going to have a different outcome on January six

0:09:17.000 --> 0:09:22.559
<v Speaker 1>by action of the Congress, which was never in the Constitution,

0:09:23.160 --> 0:09:25.640
<v Speaker 1>was never going to happen. And I think the rhetoric

0:09:25.720 --> 0:09:29.560
<v Speaker 1>since the election contributed to the disaster we saw here

0:09:30.160 --> 0:09:33.319
<v Speaker 1>the afternoon of January six, where people were misled, they

0:09:33.360 --> 0:09:37.520
<v Speaker 1>had a misunderstanding of what might happen on January six.

0:09:37.520 --> 0:09:40.880
<v Speaker 1>In Washington, d C. It's almost of a Whig Party

0:09:40.920 --> 0:09:43.120
<v Speaker 1>of another time and place, and I would suggest the

0:09:43.160 --> 0:09:46.319
<v Speaker 1>Whig Party not so much associated with Arkansas, but mostly

0:09:46.800 --> 0:09:51.479
<v Speaker 1>to the eastern Kentucky. Do you risk becoming a minority

0:09:51.520 --> 0:09:55.440
<v Speaker 1>party with this great fracture between say Ted Cruz and

0:09:55.520 --> 0:10:00.520
<v Speaker 1>Ben Sas. I think we need to remind our ourselves

0:10:00.559 --> 0:10:03.760
<v Speaker 1>of what the Republican tenants are and go back to

0:10:03.920 --> 0:10:08.520
<v Speaker 1>advocating for those limited government, limited scope of regulatory and

0:10:08.559 --> 0:10:12.480
<v Speaker 1>tax burdens on the American people, equal justice under the law,

0:10:12.800 --> 0:10:17.000
<v Speaker 1>more opportunities for people of all incomes, in a strong,

0:10:17.160 --> 0:10:20.480
<v Speaker 1>robust national security, in leadership in the world. Those are

0:10:20.520 --> 0:10:24.040
<v Speaker 1>the tenants of the Republican platform. I've heard a Senator

0:10:24.480 --> 0:10:27.400
<v Speaker 1>a Cruise speak passionately about them. I've heard Senator Sas

0:10:27.480 --> 0:10:30.680
<v Speaker 1>speak passionately about them. That's what the Republican Party needs

0:10:30.679 --> 0:10:34.480
<v Speaker 1>to get back out and advocate for and step away

0:10:34.520 --> 0:10:39.200
<v Speaker 1>from what we've seen since the election. Congressman, are you

0:10:39.280 --> 0:10:42.200
<v Speaker 1>happy with how President Trump and the Republican leadership has

0:10:42.240 --> 0:10:46.760
<v Speaker 1>handled the rollout of the coronavirus vaccine? Well, look, first,

0:10:46.840 --> 0:10:49.320
<v Speaker 1>let's say that the vaccine will go down in history.

0:10:49.400 --> 0:10:53.320
<v Speaker 1>This development effort from late January to the rollout of

0:10:53.320 --> 0:10:55.800
<v Speaker 1>a vaccine around the first of December is one of

0:10:55.840 --> 0:11:00.319
<v Speaker 1>the great global health initiatives and success stories in history.

0:11:00.920 --> 0:11:06.720
<v Speaker 1>So the CARES acts ten billion dollars for coronavirus pandemic

0:11:06.840 --> 0:11:11.679
<v Speaker 1>vaccine development. The President's quick UH direction of the FDA

0:11:11.800 --> 0:11:14.480
<v Speaker 1>and ni H to work on that is a success story.

0:11:14.960 --> 0:11:18.040
<v Speaker 1>The roll out UH and the manufacturing of it around

0:11:18.080 --> 0:11:20.920
<v Speaker 1>the world I think has been impressive. It's gotten to

0:11:21.000 --> 0:11:23.800
<v Speaker 1>the States, but we need to make sure the States

0:11:24.200 --> 0:11:28.520
<v Speaker 1>focus where it's needed, on essential workers and our elderly population.

0:11:28.920 --> 0:11:33.000
<v Speaker 1>You all, we're talking about incidences of death and you

0:11:33.040 --> 0:11:36.520
<v Speaker 1>look at that compared to accidental death by any choice,

0:11:36.559 --> 0:11:39.440
<v Speaker 1>and again it's concentrated in the older age groups are

0:11:39.520 --> 0:11:43.760
<v Speaker 1>more vulnerable to the coronavirus. So after essential workers. There's

0:11:43.800 --> 0:11:46.800
<v Speaker 1>no doubt that's where the vaccine should be focused. So Congressman,

0:11:47.320 --> 0:11:50.400
<v Speaker 1>that is true. And yet the states really have been

0:11:50.440 --> 0:11:52.920
<v Speaker 1>the ones in charge, and only about a third of

0:11:52.920 --> 0:11:56.760
<v Speaker 1>the vaccine that's been circulated on average has been deployed,

0:11:56.840 --> 0:12:00.160
<v Speaker 1>and there has been reports of, for example, doctors who

0:12:00.200 --> 0:12:02.720
<v Speaker 1>are not in the main lines having to call up

0:12:02.800 --> 0:12:05.480
<v Speaker 1>their pharmacies and their contacts and say, how do I

0:12:05.559 --> 0:12:08.360
<v Speaker 1>get vaccine? Do you regret that there isn't a more

0:12:08.640 --> 0:12:13.800
<v Speaker 1>federally central organized rollout plan that would have smoothed out

0:12:13.880 --> 0:12:18.040
<v Speaker 1>some of these kinks. Well, it possibly could have been better.

0:12:18.120 --> 0:12:21.480
<v Speaker 1>We've never done this before, but the defense logistics getting

0:12:21.520 --> 0:12:26.640
<v Speaker 1>the vaccine with the private sector produced, approved, and shipped

0:12:26.880 --> 0:12:30.680
<v Speaker 1>has been again, I think, an extraordinary accomplishment. In Arkansas,

0:12:30.720 --> 0:12:34.640
<v Speaker 1>speaking to our governor, we're generally pleased with the distribution

0:12:34.720 --> 0:12:38.160
<v Speaker 1>to hospitals and to pharmacies, and we're working hard to

0:12:38.240 --> 0:12:41.480
<v Speaker 1>get that out to the people who needed first. And

0:12:41.520 --> 0:12:43.760
<v Speaker 1>of course, you know, the storage has been a challenge.

0:12:43.840 --> 0:12:47.520
<v Speaker 1>Everyone recognizes that, particularly in the Visor vaccine, and so

0:12:47.600 --> 0:12:51.040
<v Speaker 1>that's limited distribution. With the Biderta vaccine that's going to

0:12:51.080 --> 0:12:53.600
<v Speaker 1>go out to more rural counties, and more regular pharmacy

0:12:53.720 --> 0:12:56.280
<v Speaker 1>used that I think will expand the vaccine. You've been

0:12:56.280 --> 0:12:59.400
<v Speaker 1>faster French show. To get back to the politics of

0:12:59.440 --> 0:13:02.319
<v Speaker 1>the moment, and we consider the two gentlemen from Vermont,

0:13:03.080 --> 0:13:06.720
<v Speaker 1>Lady and Sanders. Maybe we'll have chairmanships within a new Senate.

0:13:07.280 --> 0:13:10.360
<v Speaker 1>Perhaps the Democrats will manage to the middle. That seems

0:13:10.400 --> 0:13:13.240
<v Speaker 1>to be how they won this time around. How does

0:13:13.280 --> 0:13:18.600
<v Speaker 1>the Republican Party within the primary process managed to the middle.

0:13:20.320 --> 0:13:23.640
<v Speaker 1>Another good point. I mean, this is a center right country.

0:13:23.800 --> 0:13:28.040
<v Speaker 1>We saw that with Nancy. Yes, we saw that. And

0:13:28.080 --> 0:13:31.280
<v Speaker 1>it's up to both in both parties. They both have

0:13:31.400 --> 0:13:34.600
<v Speaker 1>a primary challenge from the left and the Democratic Party

0:13:34.679 --> 0:13:37.920
<v Speaker 1>and from the right. I guess you say the more

0:13:38.040 --> 0:13:41.199
<v Speaker 1>right in the Republican Party. We do that, I think

0:13:41.240 --> 0:13:43.719
<v Speaker 1>by again focusing on our basic tenants that I went

0:13:43.760 --> 0:13:45.839
<v Speaker 1>over a moment ago. That's what we have to do

0:13:45.960 --> 0:13:49.160
<v Speaker 1>is do more education and more communication with our primary

0:13:49.240 --> 0:13:53.400
<v Speaker 1>voters about what the Republican Party's goals are. Why are

0:13:53.480 --> 0:13:56.719
<v Speaker 1>we being elected, why do we run? That's our obligation

0:13:56.760 --> 0:13:59.920
<v Speaker 1>as Canada. Okay, but this is so important, carkisman Hill

0:14:00.120 --> 0:14:03.160
<v Speaker 1>very quickly here. This is so important because there is

0:14:03.200 --> 0:14:08.880
<v Speaker 1>a social overlay of social policy and issues over general

0:14:08.960 --> 0:14:13.640
<v Speaker 1>Republican issues, how do you combine those forward to two

0:14:13.640 --> 0:14:19.160
<v Speaker 1>thousand twenty two. In two thousand twenty four and win. Well,

0:14:19.200 --> 0:14:21.960
<v Speaker 1>I think we won with our message of what we

0:14:22.040 --> 0:14:25.600
<v Speaker 1>said was our commitment to America in we picked up.

0:14:25.640 --> 0:14:28.160
<v Speaker 1>We didn't have a single incumbent lose in the House

0:14:28.240 --> 0:14:32.200
<v Speaker 1>this year, and we have a new, diverse, aggressive group

0:14:32.280 --> 0:14:34.600
<v Speaker 1>of new members in the House. I think we'll continue

0:14:34.640 --> 0:14:38.080
<v Speaker 1>that momentum going into two particularly if you see the

0:14:38.120 --> 0:14:41.600
<v Speaker 1>Biden administration, as you say, not government from the center,

0:14:42.120 --> 0:14:44.960
<v Speaker 1>with a divided Senate in a divided House, but try

0:14:45.000 --> 0:14:49.600
<v Speaker 1>to again of interesting of progressive left policies. French Hill,

0:14:49.840 --> 0:14:53.160
<v Speaker 1>have a pleasant weekend after this historic the Congressman Hill

0:14:53.200 --> 0:14:59.200
<v Speaker 1>of Arkansas with us, and we thank you. This first

0:14:59.240 --> 0:15:03.920
<v Speaker 1>week of Nuary, it is about Eurasia group. Dr Bremer

0:15:03.920 --> 0:15:07.200
<v Speaker 1>and Mr coushkinsch Coupchins. I'll get it out. I can't

0:15:07.200 --> 0:15:11.200
<v Speaker 1>talking to Friday folks ever. Uh, they're wonderful. Top risks

0:15:11.240 --> 0:15:15.240
<v Speaker 1>of two thousand twenty one in that is Europe in

0:15:15.280 --> 0:15:17.800
<v Speaker 1>the changing of the Guard of Angelo, miracle. Moving on,

0:15:17.960 --> 0:15:21.360
<v Speaker 1>Mr McCraw with huge issues. Ms Raman joins with an

0:15:21.440 --> 0:15:24.240
<v Speaker 1>update with Eurasia Group. Midge, we haven't talked to about

0:15:24.720 --> 0:15:28.840
<v Speaker 1>enough about the travails of France and mccrawn. Why should

0:15:28.840 --> 0:15:34.680
<v Speaker 1>America worry about the fragility of Mr McCraw Because I

0:15:34.720 --> 0:15:39.040
<v Speaker 1>think Tom Europe's medium term stability depends more on what

0:15:39.200 --> 0:15:42.440
<v Speaker 1>happens in the French election than the German one. That

0:15:42.600 --> 0:15:44.520
<v Speaker 1>you know, the outcome of the German election is kind

0:15:44.560 --> 0:15:46.920
<v Speaker 1>of known. Is going to be a black Green government.

0:15:47.320 --> 0:15:49.760
<v Speaker 1>We don't know who will replace Miracle, but it doesn't

0:15:49.960 --> 0:15:53.280
<v Speaker 1>really matter that much because it will be it will

0:15:53.320 --> 0:15:57.080
<v Speaker 1>be a mainstream leader sitting on top of a very

0:15:57.120 --> 0:16:01.080
<v Speaker 1>pro European coalition in France. In France, you have a

0:16:01.080 --> 0:16:05.320
<v Speaker 1>health crisis, an economic crisis, and a security crisis, I

0:16:05.360 --> 0:16:09.240
<v Speaker 1>think for the terrorist incidents that took place a very

0:16:09.280 --> 0:16:11.560
<v Speaker 1>back end of last year, and they're all converging and

0:16:11.760 --> 0:16:15.760
<v Speaker 1>I think brings into questions the Macron question. And I

0:16:15.800 --> 0:16:18.640
<v Speaker 1>think on top of that, of course, because instability in

0:16:18.680 --> 0:16:20.800
<v Speaker 1>France would be a big problem for Europe in a

0:16:20.840 --> 0:16:24.200
<v Speaker 1>big problem for America. Does France have a Trumpian equivalent?

0:16:24.240 --> 0:16:26.240
<v Speaker 1>I mean Guy Johnson and I folks there for the

0:16:26.280 --> 0:16:30.000
<v Speaker 1>French elections, and the stunning side of Mr McCraw walking

0:16:30.040 --> 0:16:33.040
<v Speaker 1>across that magnificent courtyard, I mean a guest from the

0:16:33.120 --> 0:16:36.720
<v Speaker 1>nineteenth or eighteenth century and in the j RAM. And

0:16:36.720 --> 0:16:39.120
<v Speaker 1>the question is that the right, if you will of

0:16:39.280 --> 0:16:44.840
<v Speaker 1>France does it exist. You've got a very weak center

0:16:44.920 --> 0:16:48.120
<v Speaker 1>right and a very weak center left. Lapen is always,

0:16:48.360 --> 0:16:51.280
<v Speaker 1>as you know, Tom waiting in the wings, and next

0:16:51.400 --> 0:16:55.000
<v Speaker 1>year will be no different. What's interesting is Marine Lapin

0:16:55.160 --> 0:16:58.800
<v Speaker 1>has not really been able to capitalize on COVID. She's

0:16:58.840 --> 0:17:01.800
<v Speaker 1>not really been able to capitalize on the challenges and

0:17:01.840 --> 0:17:05.480
<v Speaker 1>the troubles that Macron has been facing both personally and

0:17:05.600 --> 0:17:08.719
<v Speaker 1>his government. But the question is depending on how he

0:17:08.800 --> 0:17:12.159
<v Speaker 1>deals with potential risk of the third lockdown, in this

0:17:12.280 --> 0:17:15.360
<v Speaker 1>mutant strain that's crossed the channel from Great Britain now

0:17:15.400 --> 0:17:19.560
<v Speaker 1>into France, the glacial pace of the vaccine rollout, there's

0:17:19.600 --> 0:17:23.359
<v Speaker 1>a lot of expectation of high profile business closures and

0:17:23.400 --> 0:17:25.679
<v Speaker 1>math unemployment in the first four to six months of

0:17:25.720 --> 0:17:28.359
<v Speaker 1>this year in France. You know, depending on how Macron

0:17:28.400 --> 0:17:32.320
<v Speaker 1>deals with those challenges could impact the dynamic heading into

0:17:32.480 --> 0:17:34.720
<v Speaker 1>the race next year. And I think most people expect,

0:17:34.760 --> 0:17:36.720
<v Speaker 1>and I think this is correct, that it will be

0:17:36.760 --> 0:17:41.240
<v Speaker 1>a Macron La Penn runoff again in May next year. Mitch,

0:17:41.640 --> 0:17:45.640
<v Speaker 1>you mentioned just across the channel to the UK lockdown.

0:17:45.960 --> 0:17:49.840
<v Speaker 1>There rollout of the vaccine slower as we see in

0:17:49.840 --> 0:17:51.480
<v Speaker 1>many parts of the world. Give us a sense of

0:17:52.080 --> 0:17:53.600
<v Speaker 1>how things are going in the early days of the

0:17:53.640 --> 0:17:57.080
<v Speaker 1>lockdown in the UK. I mean, it's a big mess, frankly,

0:17:57.160 --> 0:18:00.119
<v Speaker 1>because Boris Johnson is just not across the crisis is

0:18:00.280 --> 0:18:03.880
<v Speaker 1>you know, he's not good at taking and leaning into decisions.

0:18:03.880 --> 0:18:05.960
<v Speaker 1>He's waiting until the very last moment. He gave a

0:18:06.080 --> 0:18:09.440
<v Speaker 1>very big interview with a very high profile presenter here

0:18:09.480 --> 0:18:12.880
<v Speaker 1>on Sunday where he effectively told everybody will be fined

0:18:12.920 --> 0:18:15.280
<v Speaker 1>to return to school the following day. That evening he

0:18:15.640 --> 0:18:18.040
<v Speaker 1>plunged the country back into a third lockdown. So I

0:18:18.080 --> 0:18:22.199
<v Speaker 1>think the government's control of the pandemic, Boris Johnson's competence,

0:18:22.200 --> 0:18:26.439
<v Speaker 1>the competence of his administration, his cabinet, they're all really

0:18:26.840 --> 0:18:29.280
<v Speaker 1>I think, in the firing line. And that's on top

0:18:29.320 --> 0:18:31.639
<v Speaker 1>of he has delivered the deal on Brexit, that's correct,

0:18:31.840 --> 0:18:34.520
<v Speaker 1>but now the implications of that deal are really beginning

0:18:34.520 --> 0:18:38.480
<v Speaker 1>to be felt. Delays at the port's delays getting into

0:18:38.520 --> 0:18:41.560
<v Speaker 1>the UK, and I think that just it creates a

0:18:41.640 --> 0:18:44.600
<v Speaker 1>set of questions really about the credibility and competence of

0:18:44.640 --> 0:18:47.160
<v Speaker 1>the government that I think are going to stay with

0:18:47.240 --> 0:18:51.400
<v Speaker 1>Johnson for some time. What type of risk did those

0:18:51.480 --> 0:18:55.399
<v Speaker 1>challenges to Prime Minister Johnson? What are they posed to

0:18:55.560 --> 0:18:59.639
<v Speaker 1>his his government going forward? I think there's not a

0:18:59.760 --> 0:19:03.919
<v Speaker 1>lead a ship concern in the short term, but but

0:19:04.040 --> 0:19:06.840
<v Speaker 1>the pandemic now and I think the government of the

0:19:06.880 --> 0:19:10.320
<v Speaker 1>perception of how the government has managed the pandemic really

0:19:10.520 --> 0:19:13.960
<v Speaker 1>really hangs on the big bet the government has made

0:19:14.040 --> 0:19:18.200
<v Speaker 1>on the vaccinations. So they really got I think, start

0:19:18.240 --> 0:19:22.760
<v Speaker 1>getting jobs in people's arms and getting the population vaccinated.

0:19:22.800 --> 0:19:25.080
<v Speaker 1>And if the government is able to do that effectively,

0:19:25.359 --> 0:19:27.800
<v Speaker 1>So let's say we're moving towards the east to break

0:19:27.840 --> 0:19:30.800
<v Speaker 1>in a large part of the vulnerable population has been

0:19:30.880 --> 0:19:33.960
<v Speaker 1>vaccinated by that time, as the government is claiming will

0:19:34.000 --> 0:19:36.920
<v Speaker 1>be the case, then he may be able to emerge.

0:19:36.920 --> 0:19:38.640
<v Speaker 1>You know, if you're thinking a year, two years down

0:19:38.720 --> 0:19:44.360
<v Speaker 1>the track, relatively unscathed from this crisis. If the vaccination

0:19:44.560 --> 0:19:48.119
<v Speaker 1>that does not work out, um, then I think the

0:19:48.160 --> 0:19:50.680
<v Speaker 1>government's in trouble. And then I think Boris Shawn's in trouble,

0:19:50.720 --> 0:19:53.800
<v Speaker 1>and that will be a question in Mr Rahman, where

0:19:53.800 --> 0:19:57.240
<v Speaker 1>does demand come from in Europe? I mean, basically, it's

0:19:57.320 --> 0:20:01.760
<v Speaker 1>underperformed America for a jillion years. I know there's glimmers

0:20:01.840 --> 0:20:03.960
<v Speaker 1>of you know, real pop and all that, there isn't

0:20:04.080 --> 0:20:07.399
<v Speaker 1>much of a tech sector. Is well, what is the

0:20:07.560 --> 0:20:11.679
<v Speaker 1>might of the European consumer now to help jump start

0:20:11.760 --> 0:20:15.920
<v Speaker 1>everything like happens routinely in the United States. I think

0:20:15.960 --> 0:20:18.399
<v Speaker 1>this is a great question, Tom, And you know senior

0:20:18.440 --> 0:20:21.240
<v Speaker 1>European policymakers I talked to they basically think the EU

0:20:21.320 --> 0:20:24.520
<v Speaker 1>has missed the boat on digitization. I think you're right.

0:20:24.560 --> 0:20:28.560
<v Speaker 1>You know, we don't have that technical, technological, that innovation

0:20:28.720 --> 0:20:31.400
<v Speaker 1>dynamic that you see in the state where the EU

0:20:31.520 --> 0:20:34.000
<v Speaker 1>is now placing it. That is on the green transition,

0:20:34.640 --> 0:20:37.720
<v Speaker 1>on greening the economy, and you'll see the big seven

0:20:37.800 --> 0:20:40.480
<v Speaker 1>hundred and fifty billion recovery fund that was agreed at

0:20:40.520 --> 0:20:43.199
<v Speaker 1>the end of last year is really being used and

0:20:43.280 --> 0:20:46.639
<v Speaker 1>seen as a vehicle to try and promote that green transition.

0:20:46.680 --> 0:20:48.840
<v Speaker 1>And the UK is obviously at the forefront of that

0:20:48.880 --> 0:20:50.639
<v Speaker 1>and will be with the cop climates from at the

0:20:50.720 --> 0:20:54.760
<v Speaker 1>end of the year, are implementing a one billion recovery

0:20:54.800 --> 0:20:57.800
<v Speaker 1>plan that again is very much focused on the green transition.

0:20:57.840 --> 0:21:00.080
<v Speaker 1>So I think that's where the EU sees it, so

0:21:00.320 --> 0:21:03.960
<v Speaker 1>being a possible leader, whether or not will work out again,

0:21:03.960 --> 0:21:06.160
<v Speaker 1>we'll we'll need to see about the area right point

0:21:06.200 --> 0:21:08.840
<v Speaker 1>to that's one of big growth to the Ouropean economy

0:21:08.880 --> 0:21:11.360
<v Speaker 1>over the medium term. Mid Roman. Thank you so much

0:21:11.359 --> 0:21:13.199
<v Speaker 1>and thank you to all of your raising groups. Just

0:21:13.280 --> 0:21:22.320
<v Speaker 1>brilliant work, and we're just going to frame where America's

0:21:22.640 --> 0:21:27.960
<v Speaker 1>economy is. Tiffany Wilding joins from Pimco. Tiffany, I don't

0:21:27.960 --> 0:21:30.879
<v Speaker 1>want a lot of numbers. I just want to know

0:21:32.160 --> 0:21:35.840
<v Speaker 1>what the next six months looks like. You guys are

0:21:35.880 --> 0:21:41.800
<v Speaker 1>acclaimed for the new normal. Is this the new normal? Well,

0:21:41.840 --> 0:21:44.520
<v Speaker 1>I certainly hope not, Tom. I mean, you know, the

0:21:45.200 --> 0:21:47.800
<v Speaker 1>it was clearly a very weak employment report for example

0:21:47.800 --> 0:21:49.680
<v Speaker 1>this morning, which I think you know, clearly show that

0:21:49.680 --> 0:21:53.320
<v Speaker 1>the economy is still hurting from the virus pandemic, you know,

0:21:53.400 --> 0:21:56.600
<v Speaker 1>and as a result of you know, the targeted business

0:21:56.600 --> 0:21:59.280
<v Speaker 1>closures that had to had to happen in order to

0:21:59.320 --> 0:22:01.959
<v Speaker 1>try to contain that pandemic. We certainly hope that's not

0:22:02.000 --> 0:22:04.840
<v Speaker 1>the new normal. But you asked me to to think

0:22:04.840 --> 0:22:06.960
<v Speaker 1>about the next six months ahead, you know. And I

0:22:06.960 --> 0:22:09.560
<v Speaker 1>think we're really you know, we're really optimistic that the

0:22:09.840 --> 0:22:12.760
<v Speaker 1>key word here will be re acceleration. Um. And I

0:22:12.800 --> 0:22:14.919
<v Speaker 1>say that because you know, we you know, we we

0:22:15.000 --> 0:22:17.840
<v Speaker 1>do have a vaccine. We hope that the vaccine uh

0:22:18.440 --> 0:22:21.760
<v Speaker 1>distribution can be rammed up, you know. But in addition

0:22:21.760 --> 0:22:24.760
<v Speaker 1>to that, we have fiscal policymakers in Washington which we

0:22:24.840 --> 0:22:28.119
<v Speaker 1>think will will will certainly support the recovery, continue support

0:22:28.160 --> 0:22:31.679
<v Speaker 1>the recovery. We just got a nine billion dollar stimulus

0:22:31.720 --> 0:22:34.959
<v Speaker 1>bill in late December to help bridge the gap for people, uh,

0:22:35.000 --> 0:22:36.440
<v Speaker 1>you know, while we're kind of dealing with the winter

0:22:36.520 --> 0:22:38.760
<v Speaker 1>and the COVID virus. We think you could see under

0:22:38.840 --> 0:22:42.800
<v Speaker 1>a democratic control of Washington, another trillion dollars you know,

0:22:42.840 --> 0:22:44.679
<v Speaker 1>that could be that could come about in March, and

0:22:44.720 --> 0:22:46.639
<v Speaker 1>that's really going to help the economy sort of bridge

0:22:46.640 --> 0:22:49.439
<v Speaker 1>this and re accelerate into the back end. And I

0:22:49.480 --> 0:22:51.120
<v Speaker 1>don't want you to put a number on it, because

0:22:51.119 --> 0:22:53.560
<v Speaker 1>I don't need the General Council PIMCO calling me up

0:22:53.560 --> 0:22:56.159
<v Speaker 1>and saying I was out of bounds. But Tiffany to

0:22:56.280 --> 0:22:59.919
<v Speaker 1>take Claudius some is just one example the liberal economy

0:23:00.080 --> 0:23:03.639
<v Speaker 1>US in Europe, in America, who are saying, you guys

0:23:03.640 --> 0:23:06.600
<v Speaker 1>are nuts at the margin of this billion or that trillion,

0:23:07.200 --> 0:23:09.359
<v Speaker 1>and we're going to need a certain percentage of g

0:23:09.440 --> 0:23:13.240
<v Speaker 1>d P, which is six or seven or eight trillion

0:23:13.280 --> 0:23:16.639
<v Speaker 1>dollars of aid no matter how it comes. Are we

0:23:16.760 --> 0:23:21.280
<v Speaker 1>closer to that view with the news of the last week, Yeah,

0:23:21.280 --> 0:23:24.840
<v Speaker 1>so we think you could get um another another so

0:23:24.920 --> 0:23:28.000
<v Speaker 1>basically a total of two trillion this year, So another trillion,

0:23:28.119 --> 0:23:32.360
<v Speaker 1>and that's just in COVID relief. UM. And it's certainly possible,

0:23:32.680 --> 0:23:35.680
<v Speaker 1>uh that that Outside of that, you can also get

0:23:35.720 --> 0:23:39.320
<v Speaker 1>you know, some infrastructure spending or investment in education and

0:23:39.359 --> 0:23:42.199
<v Speaker 1>health care UM that you know that the Democrats have

0:23:42.280 --> 0:23:45.000
<v Speaker 1>been talking about, UM, you know, which which would obviously

0:23:45.040 --> 0:23:48.399
<v Speaker 1>be spending you know, over a longer time frame, you know,

0:23:48.440 --> 0:23:50.680
<v Speaker 1>but that would help UM. And I think that's something

0:23:50.680 --> 0:23:53.240
<v Speaker 1>that is certainly needed. UM. It would be positive over

0:23:53.280 --> 0:23:56.400
<v Speaker 1>the longer term. You would hope for things like productivity, uh,

0:23:56.400 --> 0:23:59.879
<v Speaker 1>you know, labor force quality, uh you know, you know,

0:24:00.040 --> 0:24:02.600
<v Speaker 1>things like that. So you know, I think certainly we're

0:24:02.720 --> 0:24:04.600
<v Speaker 1>you know, we're in the right track in terms of

0:24:04.600 --> 0:24:07.480
<v Speaker 1>first let's think about the pandemic. Let's you know, kind

0:24:07.480 --> 0:24:10.280
<v Speaker 1>of help the folks that need it during this time.

0:24:10.320 --> 0:24:12.919
<v Speaker 1>Let's bridge the gap there, let's set ourselves up, um,

0:24:12.960 --> 0:24:15.080
<v Speaker 1>you know, for not having the longer term damage in

0:24:15.080 --> 0:24:17.720
<v Speaker 1>the economy, you know. And then after that focus, after

0:24:17.800 --> 0:24:20.560
<v Speaker 1>we've sort of dealt with that, um we're getting vaccine distribution,

0:24:20.640 --> 0:24:22.679
<v Speaker 1>then let's think about some of these longer term trends

0:24:22.800 --> 0:24:25.520
<v Speaker 1>and what can policy do, uh, you know, to lift

0:24:25.520 --> 0:24:29.439
<v Speaker 1>productivity in the future. Tiffany mentioned, you know, as we

0:24:29.480 --> 0:24:31.480
<v Speaker 1>take a look at some of this unemployment data that

0:24:31.520 --> 0:24:34.840
<v Speaker 1>we received this morning, how concerned are you about, uh,

0:24:34.880 --> 0:24:38.560
<v Speaker 1>perhaps the permanence of some of this unemployment of some

0:24:38.600 --> 0:24:41.040
<v Speaker 1>of these folks who are out of work. You know,

0:24:41.080 --> 0:24:42.920
<v Speaker 1>at the beginning of this pandemic, we kind of thought,

0:24:42.920 --> 0:24:45.720
<v Speaker 1>oh g you know, it's kind of temporary their quote

0:24:45.760 --> 0:24:49.199
<v Speaker 1>unquote furloughed. How concerned are you about the permanent nature

0:24:49.640 --> 0:24:53.640
<v Speaker 1>the damage done to our employment situation? Yeah, I mean

0:24:53.640 --> 0:24:55.960
<v Speaker 1>that's something that that we always have to worry about,

0:24:56.080 --> 0:24:58.080
<v Speaker 1>you know, and we want to try to you know,

0:24:58.119 --> 0:25:00.840
<v Speaker 1>reduce the extent to which you get that permanent damage,

0:25:00.880 --> 0:25:03.760
<v Speaker 1>you know. And I think that the issue here is that, um,

0:25:03.800 --> 0:25:06.320
<v Speaker 1>it is really kind of you know, as as more

0:25:06.359 --> 0:25:09.600
<v Speaker 1>people are unemployed for longer, you have skills that start

0:25:09.640 --> 0:25:12.680
<v Speaker 1>to atrophy, etcetera. So you know, really what you want

0:25:12.680 --> 0:25:14.640
<v Speaker 1>to try to do is when you have these kinds

0:25:14.640 --> 0:25:16.240
<v Speaker 1>of shocks, you want to get people back in the

0:25:16.320 --> 0:25:18.399
<v Speaker 1>labor market, get them working as as soon as you

0:25:18.440 --> 0:25:20.360
<v Speaker 1>possibly can, so you don't have some of that longer

0:25:20.440 --> 0:25:22.640
<v Speaker 1>term damage. You know. I think you know, one thing

0:25:22.680 --> 0:25:24.720
<v Speaker 1>to consider here that's very important that we're monitoring is

0:25:24.760 --> 0:25:27.840
<v Speaker 1>that you will have some what we call economic reallocation

0:25:27.880 --> 0:25:30.240
<v Speaker 1>that happens. You know, in other words, there will be

0:25:30.320 --> 0:25:33.119
<v Speaker 1>some sort of longer term scars in certain industries um

0:25:33.280 --> 0:25:36.320
<v Speaker 1>from this pandemic, you know. But but but there also

0:25:36.400 --> 0:25:38.240
<v Speaker 1>be some some good things probably that come out of

0:25:38.240 --> 0:25:40.040
<v Speaker 1>it as well. So for example of that, you know,

0:25:40.080 --> 0:25:43.760
<v Speaker 1>maybe the leisure and hospitality sector never fully gets back

0:25:43.800 --> 0:25:46.560
<v Speaker 1>to normal, even though it will recover. UM. But on

0:25:46.600 --> 0:25:48.760
<v Speaker 1>the other side of that, you'll have some uh, you know,

0:25:48.880 --> 0:25:52.600
<v Speaker 1>improving trends and kind of things like warehousing, you know, transportation.

0:25:52.720 --> 0:25:55.080
<v Speaker 1>You know, as more people continue to shop online or

0:25:55.119 --> 0:25:57.479
<v Speaker 1>things like that, um, you can do more things that

0:25:57.560 --> 0:26:01.000
<v Speaker 1>are um you know via zoo room or you know,

0:26:01.040 --> 0:26:04.199
<v Speaker 1>tele telecommunications, you know, so I think that you you

0:26:04.240 --> 0:26:06.560
<v Speaker 1>need to be able to bridge the gap for people

0:26:06.640 --> 0:26:08.720
<v Speaker 1>so they can get new jobs and new industries and

0:26:08.760 --> 0:26:11.399
<v Speaker 1>you can get that economic reallocation that happens quickly and

0:26:11.480 --> 0:26:14.159
<v Speaker 1>smoothly and you don't get the longer term damage, you know,

0:26:14.200 --> 0:26:16.600
<v Speaker 1>And we certainly are optimistic that you know, we'll be

0:26:16.640 --> 0:26:19.359
<v Speaker 1>able to do that, you know, given the stimulus that

0:26:19.400 --> 0:26:21.439
<v Speaker 1>we've gotten to date, and you know, on our expectation

0:26:21.600 --> 0:26:24.880
<v Speaker 1>for for more support from the government going forward. Tiffany,

0:26:24.880 --> 0:26:27.840
<v Speaker 1>we're hearing you know, you know, kind of somewhat tongue

0:26:27.880 --> 0:26:31.400
<v Speaker 1>in cheek comparisons to the nineteen twenties. Here, how much

0:26:31.440 --> 0:26:34.960
<v Speaker 1>pent up demand do you think there really is out

0:26:34.960 --> 0:26:37.320
<v Speaker 1>there in the economy. I'm trying to fast forward a

0:26:37.320 --> 0:26:41.520
<v Speaker 1>little bit to kind of June July August. Um, do

0:26:41.560 --> 0:26:43.200
<v Speaker 1>you think people are going to kind of just kind

0:26:43.200 --> 0:26:46.040
<v Speaker 1>of burst out of their homes and apartments and go

0:26:46.080 --> 0:26:49.480
<v Speaker 1>out there and spend um. Well, you know, I think,

0:26:49.640 --> 0:26:52.280
<v Speaker 1>you know, again, like one thing, one sort of measure.

0:26:52.320 --> 0:26:54.800
<v Speaker 1>You know, obviously love to look at data and measurements

0:26:54.800 --> 0:26:56.680
<v Speaker 1>and things like that, you know, one measure I think

0:26:56.760 --> 0:26:59.639
<v Speaker 1>to look at the potential pent up demand is is

0:26:59.680 --> 0:27:02.200
<v Speaker 1>really the savings rate, um you know, and as we've seen,

0:27:02.200 --> 0:27:04.479
<v Speaker 1>the savings rate you know, has gone up a lot.

0:27:05.119 --> 0:27:07.680
<v Speaker 1>And I think that's important. You know a lot of

0:27:07.760 --> 0:27:11.000
<v Speaker 1>you know, we some of the spending and the household

0:27:11.080 --> 0:27:13.360
<v Speaker 1>relief that that people have gotten, they have not been

0:27:13.400 --> 0:27:16.680
<v Speaker 1>able to spend because uh you know, things are shut down,

0:27:16.880 --> 0:27:19.240
<v Speaker 1>um you know. And and so I certainly think that

0:27:19.480 --> 0:27:21.800
<v Speaker 1>um you know, you will get some some pin up

0:27:21.840 --> 0:27:26.119
<v Speaker 1>demand for for that type of spending when when things reopened. Certainly,

0:27:26.600 --> 0:27:28.320
<v Speaker 1>um you know, but again, as I mentioned, you know,

0:27:28.359 --> 0:27:30.199
<v Speaker 1>I don't I don't think things will be quite the

0:27:30.200 --> 0:27:32.560
<v Speaker 1>same as they were prior to this pandemic, you know,

0:27:32.560 --> 0:27:35.000
<v Speaker 1>because I think people have figured out that uh you know,

0:27:35.040 --> 0:27:38.119
<v Speaker 1>they can they can work from home more seamlessly, um

0:27:38.200 --> 0:27:40.600
<v Speaker 1>you know than they could before, for example, and things

0:27:40.600 --> 0:27:42.239
<v Speaker 1>like that. But but I think you will get some

0:27:42.240 --> 0:27:45.399
<v Speaker 1>pin up demand you know, leisure, hospitality sectors for travel

0:27:45.400 --> 0:27:48.760
<v Speaker 1>and things like that. You know, that will certainly rebound pativity. Well,

0:27:48.880 --> 0:27:51.440
<v Speaker 1>and thank you so much with PIMCO. Greatly appreciated after

0:27:51.560 --> 0:27:55.480
<v Speaker 1>jobs report. Thanks for listening to the Bloomberg Surveillance podcast.

0:27:55.880 --> 0:28:00.359
<v Speaker 1>Subscribe and listen to interviews on Apple Podcasts, Sun Cloud,

0:28:00.720 --> 0:28:04.920
<v Speaker 1>or whichever podcast platform you prefer. I'm on Twitter at

0:28:05.000 --> 0:28:09.199
<v Speaker 1>Tom Keene before the podcast. You can always catch us worldwide.

0:28:09.720 --> 0:28:10.800
<v Speaker 1>I'm Bloomberg Radio