WEBVTT - T+Lunchtime: Settlement, Musk, Hwang

0:00:03.120 --> 0:00:08.200
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg Audio Studios, Podcasts, Radio News.

0:00:10.600 --> 0:00:13.360
<v Speaker 2>Hello and welcome to The Money Stuff Podcast, your weekly

0:00:13.400 --> 0:00:16.520
<v Speaker 2>podcast where we talk about stuff related to money. I'm

0:00:16.520 --> 0:00:18.480
<v Speaker 2>Matt Levine and I write the Money Stuff column for

0:00:18.480 --> 0:00:19.360
<v Speaker 2>Bloomberg Opinion.

0:00:19.760 --> 0:00:22.640
<v Speaker 1>And I'm Katie Greifeld. I'm a reporter with Bloomberg News

0:00:22.680 --> 0:00:24.720
<v Speaker 1>and an anchor for Bloomberg Television.

0:00:26.920 --> 0:00:29.080
<v Speaker 2>Katy did that offscript, and I'm sort of clutching the

0:00:29.120 --> 0:00:29.960
<v Speaker 2>table as she did.

0:00:30.640 --> 0:00:33.360
<v Speaker 1>I forgot usually fret out the intro. I forgot to

0:00:33.400 --> 0:00:35.200
<v Speaker 1>do that this week, but I do have a strong

0:00:35.240 --> 0:00:35.920
<v Speaker 1>sense of self.

0:00:36.000 --> 0:00:37.800
<v Speaker 2>Okay, what are we talking about this week? Katie?

0:00:38.760 --> 0:00:43.600
<v Speaker 1>Great question freestyle? Yeah, T plus one. It's finally here

0:00:43.720 --> 0:00:46.440
<v Speaker 1>in the US and in Canada and Mexico.

0:00:46.720 --> 0:00:47.440
<v Speaker 2>It's possible.

0:00:47.640 --> 0:00:50.440
<v Speaker 1>Maybe it's happening in India soon. We're going to talk

0:00:50.479 --> 0:00:52.720
<v Speaker 1>about Elon Musk. We have a few different things to

0:00:52.720 --> 0:00:54.760
<v Speaker 1>talk about with Elon Musk, but I really like the

0:00:55.080 --> 0:00:57.920
<v Speaker 1>attention auction that you wrote about this week, So we're

0:00:57.920 --> 0:01:00.120
<v Speaker 1>going to talk about that, and we're going to talk

0:01:00.000 --> 0:01:03.480
<v Speaker 1>talk about Bill Wang. It thinks possible and there'll be

0:01:04.160 --> 0:01:10.080
<v Speaker 1>we do have a mill bag. I like that you saying,

0:01:10.120 --> 0:01:12.760
<v Speaker 1>and I didn't usually it's usually the other way around.

0:01:18.880 --> 0:01:22.800
<v Speaker 1>T plus one. It's here. It feels like this was abrupt.

0:01:23.000 --> 0:01:24.640
<v Speaker 1>Maybe I just haven't been paying attention.

0:01:25.000 --> 0:01:27.600
<v Speaker 2>I think that if you had been reading articles for

0:01:27.640 --> 0:01:31.440
<v Speaker 2>the last three months being like TE plus one settlement

0:01:31.520 --> 0:01:34.520
<v Speaker 2>is coming the week after Memorial Day, you would have

0:01:34.880 --> 0:01:38.039
<v Speaker 2>growen very bored. I think that's news for a long time.

0:01:38.240 --> 0:01:40.200
<v Speaker 2>I think that's like news the week before, and then

0:01:40.280 --> 0:01:42.479
<v Speaker 2>news the week it happens. But yeah, it's T plus one.

0:01:42.640 --> 0:01:45.000
<v Speaker 1>It's T plus one. It happened at the start of

0:01:45.280 --> 0:01:48.440
<v Speaker 1>this week that we're recording the podcast in there was

0:01:48.480 --> 0:01:52.400
<v Speaker 1>a beautiful day where trades from both Tuesday and Friday

0:01:52.480 --> 0:01:55.120
<v Speaker 1>settled on the same day. It was like a lunar

0:01:55.160 --> 0:01:58.200
<v Speaker 1>eclipse or a solar eclipse, whatever you want to call it.

0:01:58.200 --> 0:02:00.520
<v Speaker 1>Seems like things are actually going fine, right.

0:02:00.880 --> 0:02:05.280
<v Speaker 2>I know, you root for chaos. I root for having

0:02:05.280 --> 0:02:09.160
<v Speaker 2>funny things to write about, and so clearly it would

0:02:09.200 --> 0:02:11.720
<v Speaker 2>have been more chaotic have T plus one kind of

0:02:11.880 --> 0:02:15.160
<v Speaker 2>broken the financial system, But in fact things seem to

0:02:15.160 --> 0:02:17.440
<v Speaker 2>be going very smoothly, and in fact, the fail rate

0:02:17.960 --> 0:02:19.720
<v Speaker 2>so far it seems to be a little bit lower

0:02:19.720 --> 0:02:22.640
<v Speaker 2>than the fail rate last week, meaning that if you

0:02:22.720 --> 0:02:25.920
<v Speaker 2>do a security trade and it settles T plus two

0:02:25.960 --> 0:02:27.720
<v Speaker 2>last week, T plus one this week. Then like in

0:02:27.760 --> 0:02:30.160
<v Speaker 2>two days, you have to deliver the stock and the

0:02:30.160 --> 0:02:32.520
<v Speaker 2>other person has to deliver the money, and if you

0:02:32.560 --> 0:02:34.880
<v Speaker 2>don't do that in time, it's called a fail And

0:02:34.919 --> 0:02:37.639
<v Speaker 2>people keep track of the fail rate and every soft

0:02:37.639 --> 0:02:40.239
<v Speaker 2>and people have conspiracy theories about naked short selling because

0:02:40.280 --> 0:02:42.520
<v Speaker 2>of like the fail rate's going up or whatever, and

0:02:42.560 --> 0:02:45.320
<v Speaker 2>the fail rate like last week was like two percent

0:02:45.440 --> 0:02:49.560
<v Speaker 2>or whatever, and then this week, like the first day

0:02:49.600 --> 0:02:50.600
<v Speaker 2>of T plus one, it.

0:02:50.520 --> 0:02:52.440
<v Speaker 1>Was like a little bit lower.

0:02:53.280 --> 0:02:57.040
<v Speaker 2>So everything's going great. I was wondering what that means,

0:02:57.080 --> 0:02:59.160
<v Speaker 2>like that the fail rate is lower. Like one possibility

0:02:59.200 --> 0:03:01.799
<v Speaker 2>is that they spent all this time modernizing their systems.

0:03:02.000 --> 0:03:04.320
<v Speaker 2>They turn on the modernized systems and it just works better.

0:03:04.480 --> 0:03:05.200
<v Speaker 1>Right there you go.

0:03:05.360 --> 0:03:08.320
<v Speaker 2>Possibility. Another possibility is that everyone's in the office this week.

0:03:08.320 --> 0:03:11.519
<v Speaker 2>If you work in settlement, you're definitely not on vacations. Yeah,

0:03:11.520 --> 0:03:14.480
<v Speaker 2>you're definitely like paying total attention to making sure the

0:03:14.520 --> 0:03:15.360
<v Speaker 2>failure it stays though.

0:03:15.639 --> 0:03:17.600
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, maybe the real thing to watch will be of

0:03:17.639 --> 0:03:21.399
<v Speaker 1>course next week. Yeah, we do have another test coming

0:03:21.480 --> 0:03:25.240
<v Speaker 1>up on Friday. The MSCI indexes are going to rebalance,

0:03:25.280 --> 0:03:28.720
<v Speaker 1>so that's another potential hurdle. But yeah, definitely. The optimistic

0:03:28.720 --> 0:03:32.040
<v Speaker 1>take here is that all the preparation that Bloomberg News

0:03:32.080 --> 0:03:34.480
<v Speaker 1>and other outlets have been writing about that the banks

0:03:34.480 --> 0:03:37.360
<v Speaker 1>and everyone else are undertaking, maybe it paid off. And

0:03:37.680 --> 0:03:40.160
<v Speaker 1>this is a total y two K moment.

0:03:40.120 --> 0:03:42.000
<v Speaker 2>Y two K in the sense of it's not like

0:03:42.080 --> 0:03:45.040
<v Speaker 2>that the fears were misplaced. It's just that people worked

0:03:45.080 --> 0:03:47.160
<v Speaker 2>really hard to fix them and they succeeded.

0:03:47.400 --> 0:03:48.040
<v Speaker 1>We did it, guys.

0:03:48.280 --> 0:03:52.280
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, congratulations all the settlement professionals. I think probably if

0:03:52.320 --> 0:03:54.000
<v Speaker 2>you're a settlement professional and you spent like the last

0:03:54.000 --> 0:03:56.000
<v Speaker 2>three months complaining about this's like probably some part of

0:03:56.040 --> 0:03:57.840
<v Speaker 2>you wants there to be a disaster, so you like

0:03:57.880 --> 0:03:58.360
<v Speaker 2>I told you.

0:03:58.400 --> 0:04:01.120
<v Speaker 1>But yeah, I was saying to him Matt this morning

0:04:01.160 --> 0:04:03.600
<v Speaker 1>that this would be a lot more fun had there

0:04:03.640 --> 0:04:06.560
<v Speaker 1>been a disaster. But I guess it comes into question

0:04:06.920 --> 0:04:09.560
<v Speaker 1>what's next. I know that some people talk about T

0:04:09.640 --> 0:04:13.120
<v Speaker 1>plus zero. Gensler himself actually suggested that T plus evening

0:04:13.600 --> 0:04:16.039
<v Speaker 1>could be a possibility, But what's the point.

0:04:16.200 --> 0:04:19.159
<v Speaker 2>Well, part of why they moved to T plus one

0:04:19.680 --> 0:04:22.680
<v Speaker 2>is like the credit risk involved in waiting two days

0:04:22.720 --> 0:04:25.280
<v Speaker 2>to settle a trade. And I think the big impetus

0:04:25.360 --> 0:04:27.920
<v Speaker 2>was the memestock failures in twenty twenty one, when well,

0:04:27.920 --> 0:04:30.159
<v Speaker 2>when a lot of brokers got the large margin calls

0:04:30.160 --> 0:04:32.920
<v Speaker 2>because of the crazy volatility in the memestocks, and Robinhood

0:04:32.920 --> 0:04:34.160
<v Speaker 2>had to go out and raise money, and like the

0:04:34.200 --> 0:04:36.000
<v Speaker 2>lott of brokers shut off trading in game stop for

0:04:36.040 --> 0:04:38.480
<v Speaker 2>a while. So all that stuff felt kind of bad

0:04:38.520 --> 0:04:40.680
<v Speaker 2>and rickety, and so they wanted to change it. But

0:04:40.760 --> 0:04:42.279
<v Speaker 2>I do think another part of the impetus for this

0:04:42.360 --> 0:04:45.160
<v Speaker 2>is just like there's a general sense that payments and

0:04:45.200 --> 0:04:48.479
<v Speaker 2>like financial transactions should be real time. That wasn't always

0:04:48.520 --> 0:04:50.600
<v Speaker 2>people's sense, right, they used to like nail a check

0:04:50.680 --> 0:04:52.719
<v Speaker 2>or whatever. But now you know, you look at the

0:04:52.800 --> 0:04:55.320
<v Speaker 2>Venmo sort of, you know, like people's desire to be

0:04:55.320 --> 0:04:57.240
<v Speaker 2>able to make real time payments on their phone, and

0:04:57.279 --> 0:04:59.320
<v Speaker 2>like people find it weird that the US banking system

0:04:59.360 --> 0:05:03.640
<v Speaker 2>doesn't be support with that and with securities transactions. I

0:05:03.640 --> 0:05:07.120
<v Speaker 2>do think there's the example of crypto where crypto doesn't

0:05:07.120 --> 0:05:10.599
<v Speaker 2>always move like instantly, but like a crypto trade on

0:05:10.720 --> 0:05:13.719
<v Speaker 2>the blockchain settles when it happens, right, It's like it's

0:05:13.760 --> 0:05:18.200
<v Speaker 2>instantaneous settlement. And people sort of are introduced to the

0:05:18.200 --> 0:05:20.440
<v Speaker 2>financial world through that, and they look at stock trading

0:05:20.440 --> 0:05:21.800
<v Speaker 2>they're like, why does it take two days? Or even

0:05:21.839 --> 0:05:23.440
<v Speaker 2>why does it take one day? So I think there's

0:05:23.480 --> 0:05:25.599
<v Speaker 2>just like a sort of sense that like in a

0:05:25.680 --> 0:05:28.440
<v Speaker 2>modern computerized age, it shouldn't take any time to settle

0:05:28.440 --> 0:05:31.160
<v Speaker 2>a transaction. And I think that's like wrong. I think

0:05:31.200 --> 0:05:36.240
<v Speaker 2>it's like people confuse like the computer mechanics of like

0:05:36.279 --> 0:05:38.120
<v Speaker 2>moving the stuff around with the actual sort of like

0:05:38.160 --> 0:05:40.240
<v Speaker 2>financial mechanics of it. Nic stock trading is like very

0:05:40.279 --> 0:05:42.400
<v Speaker 2>efficient and very sort of just in time. And so

0:05:42.480 --> 0:05:44.720
<v Speaker 2>when people want to buy stock, they don't have money

0:05:44.720 --> 0:05:46.920
<v Speaker 2>sitting in their account. Most people do, but big hedgephones

0:05:46.920 --> 0:05:48.440
<v Speaker 2>want to buy so I don't have money just like

0:05:48.600 --> 0:05:50.120
<v Speaker 2>sitting around in their account. They have to like go

0:05:50.160 --> 0:05:52.080
<v Speaker 2>to their financing prime broker to like lend them the

0:05:52.080 --> 0:05:53.839
<v Speaker 2>money the moment after they agree to the trade. Right,

0:05:53.839 --> 0:05:56.239
<v Speaker 2>there's a lot of like you agree to a trade

0:05:56.240 --> 0:05:58.400
<v Speaker 2>before you have the money sitting in the account. Sometimes

0:05:58.440 --> 0:05:59.840
<v Speaker 2>you agree to the trade before you have the stock.

0:06:00.240 --> 0:06:02.760
<v Speaker 2>All those sort of business processes happen after you agree

0:06:02.800 --> 0:06:06.280
<v Speaker 2>to the trade. And if you moved to like very

0:06:06.279 --> 0:06:08.920
<v Speaker 2>fast settlement which I don't know exactly what very fast means,

0:06:08.920 --> 0:06:11.440
<v Speaker 2>Like maybe T plus evening is still like slow enough.

0:06:11.720 --> 0:06:13.200
<v Speaker 1>I want like T plus lunchtime.

0:06:13.360 --> 0:06:16.320
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, if you move to like instantaneous settlement, then like

0:06:16.480 --> 0:06:19.120
<v Speaker 2>everything changes, like you have to prefund trades, you have

0:06:19.160 --> 0:06:21.479
<v Speaker 2>to have the money sitting in the account before you

0:06:21.520 --> 0:06:23.200
<v Speaker 2>do the trade. And again, like in crypto, it kind

0:06:23.240 --> 0:06:24.760
<v Speaker 2>of works that way. Like in crypto, you kind of

0:06:24.760 --> 0:06:27.240
<v Speaker 2>prefund everything, and so people are there's like a model

0:06:27.240 --> 0:06:29.279
<v Speaker 2>for that, but it's not really how the modern financial

0:06:29.279 --> 0:06:29.960
<v Speaker 2>system works.

0:06:30.160 --> 0:06:33.039
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, I know I'm being dramatic when I say this,

0:06:33.160 --> 0:06:36.720
<v Speaker 1>but I don't know. The notion of taking pages out

0:06:36.760 --> 0:06:40.719
<v Speaker 1>of crypto infrastructure and bringing it into like the equity

0:06:40.760 --> 0:06:43.240
<v Speaker 1>market feels very weird for me. This is the second

0:06:43.240 --> 0:06:45.400
<v Speaker 1>time that we're sort of talking about that. Like we

0:06:45.440 --> 0:06:48.440
<v Speaker 1>talked about twenty four hour trading. Yeah, a few weeks

0:06:48.520 --> 0:06:50.400
<v Speaker 1>or months or years ago. At this point, I can't

0:06:50.400 --> 0:06:53.440
<v Speaker 1>remember what it feels like. But the idea that maybe

0:06:53.440 --> 0:06:56.039
<v Speaker 1>stocks being able to trade twenty four to seven or

0:06:56.040 --> 0:06:58.679
<v Speaker 1>twenty four to five, maybe that's a reality in the future.

0:06:59.040 --> 0:07:02.719
<v Speaker 1>Crypto does it here, Instantaneous settlement crypto does it. Why

0:07:02.760 --> 0:07:04.000
<v Speaker 1>not equities.

0:07:03.720 --> 0:07:06.640
<v Speaker 2>Crypto is a financial system that grew up entirely around

0:07:06.680 --> 0:07:08.920
<v Speaker 2>computers and in the computer era, right, like it dates

0:07:08.960 --> 0:07:10.720
<v Speaker 2>to like, you know, two thousand and nine. I think

0:07:11.480 --> 0:07:14.200
<v Speaker 2>if you were just like designing a financial system from

0:07:14.200 --> 0:07:17.000
<v Speaker 2>first principles, you'd be like, wow, that'll be on computers,

0:07:17.160 --> 0:07:18.360
<v Speaker 2>and then I'll be like, well, we should it open

0:07:18.360 --> 0:07:19.960
<v Speaker 2>at nine thirty in the morning. Now it's on a computer.

0:07:20.160 --> 0:07:22.080
<v Speaker 2>The Internet is open twenty four hours a day, so

0:07:22.120 --> 0:07:24.320
<v Speaker 2>you'd sort of design a system like that. And similarly,

0:07:24.480 --> 0:07:26.920
<v Speaker 2>if you're like, well, I've got a database of stocks

0:07:26.920 --> 0:07:29.480
<v Speaker 2>and a database of dollars, and like when I agree

0:07:29.520 --> 0:07:32.240
<v Speaker 2>a trade, we swapped the dollars to the stocks, It's like, yeah,

0:07:32.240 --> 0:07:34.520
<v Speaker 2>that should happen like on a computer, like immediately. Right,

0:07:34.560 --> 0:07:37.480
<v Speaker 2>if you're designing a financial system in two thousand and

0:07:37.560 --> 0:07:40.080
<v Speaker 2>nine or in twenty twenty four around computers, like you'll

0:07:40.160 --> 0:07:43.960
<v Speaker 2>naturally have twenty four hour real time trades. Right. It

0:07:44.080 --> 0:07:47.040
<v Speaker 2>just so happens that the actual financial system grew up

0:07:47.040 --> 0:07:50.640
<v Speaker 2>over hundreds of years and wasn't built around computers, and

0:07:51.800 --> 0:07:55.640
<v Speaker 2>the processes that have built up around that are very

0:07:55.680 --> 0:07:58.080
<v Speaker 2>path dependent and historically determined, but some of them are

0:07:58.800 --> 0:08:03.640
<v Speaker 2>good ish or like they work for humans or they

0:08:03.720 --> 0:08:06.040
<v Speaker 2>work for a financial system. So with twenty four hour trading,

0:08:06.120 --> 0:08:09.440
<v Speaker 2>what we talked about was in fact, in modern markets,

0:08:09.640 --> 0:08:12.760
<v Speaker 2>people like concentrated liquidity. You know, the stock markets open

0:08:12.800 --> 0:08:14.160
<v Speaker 2>six and a half hours a day, but like people

0:08:14.200 --> 0:08:16.560
<v Speaker 2>actually like largely traded the clothes because that's when everyone

0:08:16.560 --> 0:08:18.160
<v Speaker 2>else is trading, and it's good to be able to

0:08:18.160 --> 0:08:20.200
<v Speaker 2>trade when everyone else is trading. And if you spread

0:08:20.200 --> 0:08:22.280
<v Speaker 2>out your trading over twenty four hours, a few people

0:08:22.280 --> 0:08:25.000
<v Speaker 2>to trade with in like three am. And similarly here

0:08:25.000 --> 0:08:27.920
<v Speaker 2>it's yeah, like if everything moved instantaneously, like in some ways,

0:08:27.960 --> 0:08:30.400
<v Speaker 2>that would look more efficient, but it would mean that

0:08:30.440 --> 0:08:32.400
<v Speaker 2>you'd need to have the money in your account before

0:08:32.440 --> 0:08:35.360
<v Speaker 2>you did a trade, and so there'd be like weird stuff.

0:08:35.480 --> 0:08:37.520
<v Speaker 2>A lot of the problems that people worried about with

0:08:37.520 --> 0:08:41.360
<v Speaker 2>T plus one were foreign investors having to convert currents.

0:08:41.559 --> 0:08:45.360
<v Speaker 2>If you're a foreign investor and you want to buy

0:08:45.400 --> 0:08:48.200
<v Speaker 2>a US stock, you can just decide to do that

0:08:48.760 --> 0:08:52.160
<v Speaker 2>and then figure out how to convert your euros into

0:08:52.200 --> 0:08:55.160
<v Speaker 2>dollars later, not like much later, but like two minutes later,

0:08:55.280 --> 0:08:57.439
<v Speaker 2>and an instantaneous settlement world, you wouldn't be able to

0:08:57.440 --> 0:09:00.599
<v Speaker 2>do that. Now, maybe your FX transaction would also settletaneously

0:09:00.760 --> 0:09:03.280
<v Speaker 2>and everything with like just in time workout, But it's

0:09:03.280 --> 0:09:03.800
<v Speaker 2>like trickier.

0:09:04.040 --> 0:09:06.880
<v Speaker 1>It does seem really complicated, especially, I mean the FX

0:09:06.880 --> 0:09:09.400
<v Speaker 1>piece talking about T plus one. When it comes to

0:09:10.160 --> 0:09:14.120
<v Speaker 1>just domestic US equities, that's somewhat easy to wrap one's

0:09:14.160 --> 0:09:17.000
<v Speaker 1>mind around, but thinking about the FX piece and the

0:09:17.000 --> 0:09:20.160
<v Speaker 1>international investor piece. I was talking to someone on TV

0:09:20.320 --> 0:09:22.520
<v Speaker 1>sometime this week and they said, you went from having

0:09:23.280 --> 0:09:26.480
<v Speaker 1>twelve hours to source your US dollars to having like

0:09:26.520 --> 0:09:27.040
<v Speaker 1>two hours.

0:09:27.080 --> 0:09:28.520
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, And like, I don't know you say that to

0:09:28.559 --> 0:09:30.200
<v Speaker 2>a normal person, And it's like, how long does it

0:09:30.240 --> 0:09:32.800
<v Speaker 2>take for your bank to convert your years?

0:09:32.800 --> 0:09:35.800
<v Speaker 1>And I've never thought about it, right, Like, yeah.

0:09:35.320 --> 0:09:37.800
<v Speaker 2>It should theoretically it kind of should take a millisecond.

0:09:38.040 --> 0:09:41.240
<v Speaker 1>Yeah right, Well maybe that's computer entries, but that's the

0:09:41.559 --> 0:09:44.440
<v Speaker 1>world we're rapidly hurtling towards her. Maybe we're already in

0:09:44.480 --> 0:09:46.040
<v Speaker 1>Can we talk about the thing I won't really want

0:09:46.080 --> 0:09:49.679
<v Speaker 1>to talk about? Okay? So I cover ETFs in my

0:09:49.760 --> 0:09:52.560
<v Speaker 1>day job, and I think that a lot of etf

0:09:52.600 --> 0:09:56.319
<v Speaker 1>issuers do is securities lending. They lend out the securities

0:09:56.360 --> 0:09:59.800
<v Speaker 1>and their portfolio it gets them a few basis points

0:10:00.080 --> 0:10:02.240
<v Speaker 1>for doing that. They make that, but you think about

0:10:02.240 --> 0:10:04.480
<v Speaker 1>the expense ratios on a lot of these ETFs and

0:10:04.600 --> 0:10:07.960
<v Speaker 1>they're like three basis points, So a couple of basis

0:10:07.960 --> 0:10:12.679
<v Speaker 1>points is super meaningful. I don't really understand how security

0:10:12.760 --> 0:10:16.640
<v Speaker 1>is lending is impacted by this move to T plus one.

0:10:16.720 --> 0:10:18.640
<v Speaker 1>It seems like it would be a headache. Not just

0:10:18.640 --> 0:10:21.200
<v Speaker 1>an ETFs, put mutual funds, et cetera.

0:10:21.559 --> 0:10:25.000
<v Speaker 2>It's a huge headache, I think. So here's why it works. So,

0:10:25.040 --> 0:10:27.000
<v Speaker 2>like you're a mutual fund or you're an ETF, you

0:10:27.080 --> 0:10:29.240
<v Speaker 2>like lend out your stocks. You know on stocks, you

0:10:29.320 --> 0:10:31.520
<v Speaker 2>lend them out, then you decide to sell them right

0:10:31.520 --> 0:10:34.320
<v Speaker 2>because you have outflows or because you're your indexes rebalancing

0:10:34.360 --> 0:10:37.280
<v Speaker 2>or whatever, you decide to sell your stocks. So between

0:10:37.320 --> 0:10:40.320
<v Speaker 2>the minute you sell the stock, the minute you'd like

0:10:40.640 --> 0:10:44.040
<v Speaker 2>your sell order executes on the stock exchange, and the

0:10:44.120 --> 0:10:46.960
<v Speaker 2>settlement date, you have to get the stock right. Like

0:10:47.000 --> 0:10:49.319
<v Speaker 2>you've loaned it out, you don't have it in your possession,

0:10:49.360 --> 0:10:53.520
<v Speaker 2>so you have to call back the borrow. So you

0:10:53.559 --> 0:10:54.920
<v Speaker 2>had two days to do that. Now you have one

0:10:55.000 --> 0:10:57.160
<v Speaker 2>day to do it right. Now you call back the

0:10:57.200 --> 0:10:59.559
<v Speaker 2>borrow by like you've loaned the stock out, probably through

0:10:59.600 --> 0:11:02.120
<v Speaker 2>a broke who's loaned out to like a short cellar.

0:11:02.200 --> 0:11:04.320
<v Speaker 2>So you call your broker and you say call the

0:11:04.320 --> 0:11:06.079
<v Speaker 2>intermediary and you say, I want the stock back in.

0:11:06.120 --> 0:11:09.120
<v Speaker 2>The intermediary calls the hedge fund who borrowed it and said,

0:11:09.120 --> 0:11:11.000
<v Speaker 2>we want the stock pack and the edge fund doesn't

0:11:11.000 --> 0:11:12.800
<v Speaker 2>have it either. They've sold the stock, so they have

0:11:12.920 --> 0:11:15.240
<v Speaker 2>to find it somewhere else right now, maybe they borrow

0:11:15.280 --> 0:11:17.480
<v Speaker 2>it from some other mutual fund or some other lender,

0:11:17.559 --> 0:11:20.160
<v Speaker 2>right and then they borrow it in like four hours

0:11:20.280 --> 0:11:22.319
<v Speaker 2>and they deliver it to you within twenty four hours,

0:11:22.320 --> 0:11:25.360
<v Speaker 2>and then you deliver it to settle your sale. But

0:11:25.400 --> 0:11:27.400
<v Speaker 2>another possibility is like they can't borrow it and they

0:11:27.440 --> 0:11:29.880
<v Speaker 2>have to buy in their short but then that settles

0:11:29.920 --> 0:11:31.960
<v Speaker 2>T plus one. So they're doing a trade after you

0:11:32.040 --> 0:11:34.319
<v Speaker 2>that has to settle before you in order to give

0:11:34.360 --> 0:11:36.240
<v Speaker 2>you the stocks that you can deliver it on your cell.

0:11:36.559 --> 0:11:38.840
<v Speaker 2>So it's like very tricky, and I think that like

0:11:38.960 --> 0:11:41.839
<v Speaker 2>one thing that mutual funds have been at least talking

0:11:41.880 --> 0:11:44.960
<v Speaker 2>about doing to address this is calling in their borrow

0:11:45.000 --> 0:11:47.199
<v Speaker 2>before they sell their stock. You know, you're having like

0:11:47.240 --> 0:11:51.440
<v Speaker 2>an index rebalanceing or whatever. Instead of hitting sell and

0:11:51.480 --> 0:11:53.920
<v Speaker 2>then calling back your borrow, you call back your borrow

0:11:53.960 --> 0:11:55.600
<v Speaker 2>the day before, so you make sure it settles, and

0:11:55.600 --> 0:11:58.160
<v Speaker 2>then you hit sell. Larry Tabbo Bloomberg Intelligence that has

0:11:58.200 --> 0:12:01.160
<v Speaker 2>written about like the problems of that in terms of

0:12:01.200 --> 0:12:03.600
<v Speaker 2>both you lose like a day of that lending income,

0:12:03.600 --> 0:12:06.000
<v Speaker 2>but you also maybe tip your hand that you're going

0:12:06.000 --> 0:12:08.280
<v Speaker 2>to be signing the stock because you're calling a sophisticated

0:12:08.320 --> 0:12:09.959
<v Speaker 2>hedge fund and saying we need our borrow back. The

0:12:10.000 --> 0:12:13.440
<v Speaker 2>hedge fund gets some information from that. They know you're selling. Yeah.

0:12:13.679 --> 0:12:16.480
<v Speaker 1>I guess from my perspective of someone who cares about

0:12:16.520 --> 0:12:18.800
<v Speaker 1>the ETF and a little bit the mutual fund world,

0:12:18.960 --> 0:12:21.440
<v Speaker 1>the fact that you do lose a day of that

0:12:21.520 --> 0:12:22.400
<v Speaker 1>fee coming in.

0:12:22.840 --> 0:12:24.760
<v Speaker 2>And I don't think that's a big deal.

0:12:25.160 --> 0:12:27.040
<v Speaker 1>You lose a day on Also.

0:12:26.679 --> 0:12:28.319
<v Speaker 2>They have twenty basis points of earnings.

0:12:28.360 --> 0:12:30.760
<v Speaker 1>Hey, that sounds pretty good. I mean, we're talking about

0:12:30.840 --> 0:12:33.600
<v Speaker 1>razor thin margins on some of these ETFs. I'm wondering

0:12:33.600 --> 0:12:37.760
<v Speaker 1>if it'll make securities lending a less appealing proposition for

0:12:37.960 --> 0:12:38.880
<v Speaker 1>some of these companies.

0:12:39.240 --> 0:12:41.920
<v Speaker 2>I be surprised if it moves the needle on that

0:12:42.080 --> 0:12:44.200
<v Speaker 2>because it's the money. You know, if you're like an

0:12:44.240 --> 0:12:46.199
<v Speaker 2>index e, you're not selling stock that often.

0:12:46.400 --> 0:12:48.400
<v Speaker 1>All right, that's everything I wanted to know about this.

0:12:48.679 --> 0:12:49.840
<v Speaker 2>That's probably everything I wanted to say.

0:12:49.920 --> 0:12:52.080
<v Speaker 1>But I guess we'll talk about it when we do

0:12:52.160 --> 0:12:54.600
<v Speaker 1>move to T plus zero, because actually it surprised me

0:12:54.640 --> 0:12:56.760
<v Speaker 1>to learn that we only moved to T plus two

0:12:56.840 --> 0:12:57.760
<v Speaker 1>and twenty seventeen.

0:12:58.120 --> 0:12:59.240
<v Speaker 2>Oh yeah, I was there.

0:12:59.280 --> 0:13:00.320
<v Speaker 3>I was not.

0:13:00.559 --> 0:13:02.640
<v Speaker 1>I mean I was there, actually, I just was not

0:13:02.640 --> 0:13:05.080
<v Speaker 1>paying attention. Yeah, yeah, no, what was that doing.

0:13:05.200 --> 0:13:07.120
<v Speaker 2>It was really twenty seventeen. Hey, I remember that. Yeah,

0:13:07.200 --> 0:13:08.760
<v Speaker 2>it was T plus three for my whole career, and

0:13:08.840 --> 0:13:11.960
<v Speaker 2>it was like plus five in like the sixties or something.

0:13:12.080 --> 0:13:15.439
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, we moved to T plus three, I guess in

0:13:15.520 --> 0:13:16.440
<v Speaker 1>nineteen ninety three.

0:13:16.760 --> 0:13:18.760
<v Speaker 2>My favorite part is that I didn't know this still

0:13:18.760 --> 0:13:20.480
<v Speaker 2>like this week it was T plus one, and like

0:13:20.520 --> 0:13:23.120
<v Speaker 2>the nineteen until nineteen years, I sort of imagine that,

0:13:23.160 --> 0:13:24.800
<v Speaker 2>like the reason it was T plus three or whatever,

0:13:24.840 --> 0:13:26.120
<v Speaker 2>you know, I grew up in T plus three. The

0:13:26.120 --> 0:13:27.560
<v Speaker 2>reason it was T plus three is because like you

0:13:27.600 --> 0:13:29.720
<v Speaker 2>needed to like load the stock certificates on a horse

0:13:29.760 --> 0:13:31.840
<v Speaker 2>and buggy and take them across around and count them

0:13:31.840 --> 0:13:32.200
<v Speaker 2>by hand.

0:13:32.320 --> 0:13:33.440
<v Speaker 1>That was happening in the nineties.

0:13:33.800 --> 0:13:35.920
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, no, it was happening in the twenties, but like

0:13:35.960 --> 0:13:37.760
<v Speaker 2>there were only so many stock certificates, so you could

0:13:37.800 --> 0:13:39.400
<v Speaker 2>do all of that in one day, right, Yeah, And

0:13:39.440 --> 0:13:42.240
<v Speaker 2>so it only became like a longer settlement process when

0:13:42.280 --> 0:13:45.000
<v Speaker 2>there were more trades and they were not like fully computerized,

0:13:45.040 --> 0:13:47.000
<v Speaker 2>and so you had you know, max that at T

0:13:47.120 --> 0:13:49.520
<v Speaker 2>plus five where it was like still a pretty manual process,

0:13:49.559 --> 0:13:51.920
<v Speaker 2>but there were a lot of trades, and now there

0:13:51.920 --> 0:13:55.760
<v Speaker 2>are many more trades, but it's a much less manual process. Okay,

0:13:56.040 --> 0:13:56.559
<v Speaker 2>there we are.

0:13:57.240 --> 0:14:10.760
<v Speaker 3>We're some buggies.

0:14:12.120 --> 0:14:16.320
<v Speaker 1>Oh boy, Elon Musk, it's been several weeks since we

0:14:16.920 --> 0:14:18.439
<v Speaker 1>really really dug in.

0:14:18.760 --> 0:14:21.040
<v Speaker 2>Part of me feels like Elon Musk, it's always the same.

0:14:20.840 --> 0:14:23.200
<v Speaker 1>Story, and that is checking his phone. He just checked

0:14:23.200 --> 0:14:25.560
<v Speaker 1>the time he has to want to talk about this.

0:14:26.760 --> 0:14:29.720
<v Speaker 1>We are drawing closer and closer to that shareholder vote.

0:14:29.800 --> 0:14:33.240
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, so, Elon Musk, he had a huge package of

0:14:33.280 --> 0:14:35.720
<v Speaker 2>options from Tesla in like twenty eighteenth. You know, everyone

0:14:35.760 --> 0:14:37.840
<v Speaker 2>says it's fifty six billion dollars, it doesn't really matter.

0:14:38.280 --> 0:14:42.480
<v Speaker 2>And then this year a Delaware judge said, no, we're

0:14:42.520 --> 0:14:45.800
<v Speaker 2>taking those back, and in reaction to that, Tesla wants

0:14:45.840 --> 0:14:47.560
<v Speaker 2>two things. They want the shareholders to vote to give

0:14:47.600 --> 0:14:51.160
<v Speaker 2>him back the options, and they want the shareholders to

0:14:51.240 --> 0:14:54.080
<v Speaker 2>vote to reincorporate the company in Texas so that no

0:14:54.200 --> 0:14:57.840
<v Speaker 2>Delaware judge can ever again take away Elon Musk's money.

0:14:57.960 --> 0:14:58.600
<v Speaker 2>Both of those votes.

0:14:58.640 --> 0:15:01.400
<v Speaker 1>As j thirteenth, he met the targets. Yeah, that he

0:15:01.480 --> 0:15:02.280
<v Speaker 1>was supposed to hit.

0:15:02.520 --> 0:15:05.840
<v Speaker 2>Like, I'm not a big ela On Musk pooster necessarily,

0:15:05.920 --> 0:15:08.520
<v Speaker 2>but I feel like here in this money, yeah, like

0:15:08.560 --> 0:15:11.320
<v Speaker 2>he should get the money. Maybe this is just projecting,

0:15:11.360 --> 0:15:16.200
<v Speaker 2>but my impression is that the maybe like most standard

0:15:16.280 --> 0:15:19.960
<v Speaker 2>view among the institutional investors in Tesla is one he

0:15:20.000 --> 0:15:23.320
<v Speaker 2>should get the money. Fair is fair, and two they

0:15:23.320 --> 0:15:24.880
<v Speaker 2>should not reincorporate in Texas.

0:15:25.160 --> 0:15:28.520
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, so let's attack the first point because I've been

0:15:28.520 --> 0:15:33.800
<v Speaker 1>thinking about why that doesn't feel great. So, yes, fair

0:15:33.840 --> 0:15:35.720
<v Speaker 1>is fair here in the money, But like, I feel

0:15:35.760 --> 0:15:38.360
<v Speaker 1>like you have to kind of forget about everything that

0:15:38.400 --> 0:15:40.920
<v Speaker 1>has happened in the past year or so. I mean,

0:15:40.960 --> 0:15:43.680
<v Speaker 1>I'm talking pretty short term when I talk about the

0:15:43.760 --> 0:15:46.840
<v Speaker 1>year to date performance of Tesla, but it's been pretty bad.

0:15:46.840 --> 0:15:49.280
<v Speaker 1>We've seen a big draw down in market cap and

0:15:49.360 --> 0:15:52.440
<v Speaker 1>they're facing real business problems right now.

0:15:52.640 --> 0:15:54.000
<v Speaker 2>Right When I say here in the money, I mean

0:15:54.040 --> 0:15:56.400
<v Speaker 2>like he was granted this money in twenty eighteen with

0:15:56.480 --> 0:15:58.320
<v Speaker 2>the goal of taking the market cap from like fifty

0:15:58.320 --> 0:16:00.360
<v Speaker 2>billion to six hundred and fifty billion dollars and he

0:16:00.400 --> 0:16:03.000
<v Speaker 2>did that by like twenty twenty one. Yeah, and so

0:16:03.040 --> 0:16:04.720
<v Speaker 2>he earned the money and they gave him the grants

0:16:04.720 --> 0:16:07.720
<v Speaker 2>and then now they've been taken away. But like since then, yeah, yeah,

0:16:07.880 --> 0:16:10.840
<v Speaker 2>things have changed. It's weird. It's a very backward looking

0:16:10.880 --> 0:16:13.040
<v Speaker 2>pay award, yeah, because it was a forward looking pay

0:16:13.040 --> 0:16:15.360
<v Speaker 2>award in twenty eighteen that has not been reversed. But

0:16:15.560 --> 0:16:18.480
<v Speaker 2>the question is should they give him this backward looking

0:16:18.520 --> 0:16:21.680
<v Speaker 2>pay award because he did accomplish all these things in

0:16:21.720 --> 0:16:24.280
<v Speaker 2>the past. And I kind of think the answer is yes,

0:16:24.400 --> 0:16:27.040
<v Speaker 2>that's fair. But I do think that if you're a

0:16:27.320 --> 0:16:30.920
<v Speaker 2>just hyper rational investor looking at things today, it's like,

0:16:31.640 --> 0:16:33.120
<v Speaker 2>is it a good idea to give him all this

0:16:33.200 --> 0:16:35.320
<v Speaker 2>money given what has he done for me lately?

0:16:35.640 --> 0:16:39.560
<v Speaker 1>Yeah? Yeah, I mean Tesla has a pretty sizable retail

0:16:39.720 --> 0:16:41.280
<v Speaker 1>I mean a lot of them are huge fans of

0:16:41.280 --> 0:16:44.560
<v Speaker 1>Elon Musk. But I would just imagine that human psychology

0:16:44.600 --> 0:16:46.280
<v Speaker 1>is going to play in as and what has he

0:16:46.360 --> 0:16:47.160
<v Speaker 1>done for me lately?

0:16:47.400 --> 0:16:49.360
<v Speaker 2>Oh yeah, yeah, the retail people are there because they

0:16:49.400 --> 0:16:52.320
<v Speaker 2>love Elon Musk. Yeah, the institutions, I think it's more.

0:16:52.520 --> 0:16:54.560
<v Speaker 1>I mean you have seen like Glass Lewis come out

0:16:54.600 --> 0:16:56.840
<v Speaker 1>and say that they probably shouldn't vote for this.

0:16:57.000 --> 0:16:59.120
<v Speaker 2>There are few those came out against it in twenty

0:16:59.240 --> 0:16:59.800
<v Speaker 2>eighteen as well.

0:17:00.080 --> 0:17:03.480
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, something that keeps coming up is and this is

0:17:03.520 --> 0:17:06.680
<v Speaker 1>something you've written about, is just that he's got a

0:17:06.800 --> 0:17:10.280
<v Speaker 1>lot going on. This man is the CEO of six companies.

0:17:10.680 --> 0:17:14.560
<v Speaker 1>It's clear that Tesla isn't like really the only thing

0:17:14.720 --> 0:17:18.040
<v Speaker 1>occupying his mind share right now. He was really into

0:17:18.160 --> 0:17:22.080
<v Speaker 1>his AI startup SpaceX Scark. I forgot actually that the

0:17:22.160 --> 0:17:24.640
<v Speaker 1>boring company was still in there as well.

0:17:25.640 --> 0:17:27.800
<v Speaker 2>The boring company is the one I always mentioned because

0:17:27.840 --> 0:17:30.040
<v Speaker 2>it's like, I think, if you rank, how much does

0:17:30.119 --> 0:17:33.960
<v Speaker 2>Elon Musk speak publicly about, pay attention to and care

0:17:34.040 --> 0:17:37.359
<v Speaker 2>about his companies? Like, yeah, Tesla is really volatile and

0:17:37.480 --> 0:17:40.600
<v Speaker 2>like right now Tesla maybe like having some problems of

0:17:40.680 --> 0:17:43.639
<v Speaker 2>getting his attention, although the vote complicates that, But like

0:17:44.040 --> 0:17:47.000
<v Speaker 2>boring companies usually toward the bottom because its name is

0:17:47.040 --> 0:17:49.840
<v Speaker 2>the boring company. It digs tunnels. It's like just sort

0:17:49.880 --> 0:17:50.280
<v Speaker 2>of less.

0:17:50.320 --> 0:17:52.320
<v Speaker 1>It's like the cash in the portfolio, you know, you

0:17:52.359 --> 0:17:53.359
<v Speaker 1>don't really talk about it.

0:17:53.720 --> 0:17:54.040
<v Speaker 3>Sort of.

0:17:54.840 --> 0:17:56.800
<v Speaker 2>It's not literally like that because no.

0:17:57.560 --> 0:17:59.560
<v Speaker 1>Just in terms of like a small allocation that you

0:17:59.600 --> 0:18:03.280
<v Speaker 1>don't really think about. Neuralink is real obviously when you

0:18:03.320 --> 0:18:06.480
<v Speaker 1>look at the portfolio of his company's Twitter is the

0:18:06.560 --> 0:18:09.119
<v Speaker 1>weirdest one to me, x I'm sorry.

0:18:09.400 --> 0:18:11.600
<v Speaker 2>Elon Musk is really into AI, right, Yeah, He's kind

0:18:11.640 --> 0:18:13.600
<v Speaker 2>of always been into AI. He was a founder of

0:18:13.760 --> 0:18:16.560
<v Speaker 2>open Ai, right is now not an affiliated and angry

0:18:16.560 --> 0:18:18.240
<v Speaker 2>about and like suing open Ai. But he was like

0:18:18.320 --> 0:18:21.320
<v Speaker 2>there at the beginning, and he's very into AI right now,

0:18:21.920 --> 0:18:23.879
<v Speaker 2>and everyone's kind of right into AI right now. And

0:18:23.920 --> 0:18:26.359
<v Speaker 2>in some ways it's like weirdly trend following for Elon

0:18:26.480 --> 0:18:28.840
<v Speaker 2>Musk to be like, I also have a large language

0:18:28.880 --> 0:18:31.000
<v Speaker 2>model startup. Right, That's never been his thing. Right, He's

0:18:31.040 --> 0:18:34.080
<v Speaker 2>not like, oh, I'm founding the tenth electric car company

0:18:34.160 --> 0:18:36.040
<v Speaker 2>or the tenth commercial rocket company.

0:18:36.160 --> 0:18:36.280
<v Speaker 1>Right.

0:18:36.359 --> 0:18:38.920
<v Speaker 2>He's not like, you know, in fierce competition and like

0:18:39.040 --> 0:18:41.240
<v Speaker 2>the tunnel digging business. Right, It's like all of his

0:18:41.359 --> 0:18:44.120
<v Speaker 2>ideas have been sort of unusual and then XAI. He's like, yeah,

0:18:44.119 --> 0:18:46.040
<v Speaker 2>I'll do a large luggage model. Why not? But it

0:18:46.119 --> 0:18:48.320
<v Speaker 2>did seem like he had big AI plans for Twitter,

0:18:48.480 --> 0:18:50.720
<v Speaker 2>and like Tessla does do a lot of not like

0:18:50.840 --> 0:18:52.840
<v Speaker 2>large language models, but like a lot of AI for

0:18:53.040 --> 0:18:57.840
<v Speaker 2>like the self driving cars. And it's a little strange though.

0:18:57.960 --> 0:19:02.080
<v Speaker 2>He has instead started a separate company for AI and

0:19:02.359 --> 0:19:04.520
<v Speaker 2>ramped it up and has a twenty four billion dollar

0:19:04.600 --> 0:19:07.720
<v Speaker 2>valuation now and is raising money and seems to be,

0:19:08.000 --> 0:19:10.679
<v Speaker 2>to some extent the apple of his eye, and Tesla's

0:19:10.920 --> 0:19:12.080
<v Speaker 2>maybe a little neglected.

0:19:12.400 --> 0:19:14.800
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, it does feel like that, and you think about

0:19:14.840 --> 0:19:16.520
<v Speaker 1>I mean, his threat is that if he doesn't get

0:19:16.560 --> 0:19:20.440
<v Speaker 1>this pay package, then hold devote his energy and time elsewhere.

0:19:20.760 --> 0:19:22.639
<v Speaker 1>It seems like he's doing that already. And even if

0:19:22.720 --> 0:19:26.920
<v Speaker 1>the pay package was reapproved again on June thirteenth, I

0:19:26.960 --> 0:19:30.800
<v Speaker 1>believe the vote is it's not clear that would get

0:19:30.880 --> 0:19:32.520
<v Speaker 1>him re excited about Tesla.

0:19:32.800 --> 0:19:35.399
<v Speaker 2>So two things. One, like glass Lewis, one of their

0:19:35.440 --> 0:19:38.080
<v Speaker 2>objections to his pay package is that he has clearly

0:19:38.160 --> 0:19:40.360
<v Speaker 2>not been focused on Tesla. Yeah, and Tesla put out

0:19:40.400 --> 0:19:43.680
<v Speaker 2>this response that's a stockholder should care noormously about value

0:19:43.720 --> 0:19:46.960
<v Speaker 2>creation and not about whether Elon's perceived focus in scare

0:19:47.040 --> 0:19:50.639
<v Speaker 2>quotes was strong enough, and like, that's fair, but it

0:19:50.720 --> 0:19:53.720
<v Speaker 2>depends on your time frame. And in recent months, the

0:19:53.880 --> 0:19:57.399
<v Speaker 2>value creation has maybe tracked his lack of focus. Right

0:19:57.480 --> 0:19:59.439
<v Speaker 2>since the Twitter deal, like his lack of focus has

0:19:59.480 --> 0:20:02.200
<v Speaker 2>been bad for now Again, this pay package is for

0:20:02.359 --> 0:20:04.080
<v Speaker 2>like the work he did from twenty eighteen to twenty

0:20:04.160 --> 0:20:07.439
<v Speaker 2>twenty one, so I can see approving it, but as

0:20:07.480 --> 0:20:09.600
<v Speaker 2>a going forward better Yeah, you'd be worried about his

0:20:09.720 --> 0:20:12.720
<v Speaker 2>lack of focus, not only because you keep reading articles

0:20:12.760 --> 0:20:14.320
<v Speaker 2>about the other stuff he's doing, but also because the

0:20:14.359 --> 0:20:16.879
<v Speaker 2>stick price is down and like it's izing business challenges.

0:20:17.359 --> 0:20:19.040
<v Speaker 2>The other thing I'd say is Tesla's in a weird

0:20:19.080 --> 0:20:22.280
<v Speaker 2>position in terms of like how much of Elon Musk's

0:20:22.480 --> 0:20:26.760
<v Speaker 2>focus it gets or it will get going forward, because

0:20:26.800 --> 0:20:29.320
<v Speaker 2>it's his only public company and also it's his biggest company,

0:20:29.680 --> 0:20:32.240
<v Speaker 2>and so on the one hand, that means it is

0:20:32.400 --> 0:20:36.200
<v Speaker 2>his like cash source. It is I think more important

0:20:36.280 --> 0:20:38.640
<v Speaker 2>to his fortune than any of the other companies, because

0:20:38.640 --> 0:20:41.000
<v Speaker 2>it's if he needs a billion dollars, he can get

0:20:41.040 --> 0:20:44.000
<v Speaker 2>it by selling Tesla stock borrowing against Tesla's slock much

0:20:44.080 --> 0:20:46.240
<v Speaker 2>more easily than he can from his other companies, and

0:20:46.400 --> 0:20:48.879
<v Speaker 2>so he sometimes does a need for a large amounts

0:20:48.880 --> 0:20:51.840
<v Speaker 2>of money, for example to buy Twitter. Yeah, and when

0:20:51.840 --> 0:20:55.360
<v Speaker 2>he does that, he sells Tesla stock. So Tesla's really

0:20:55.359 --> 0:20:58.040
<v Speaker 2>important to him. And if some of his other companies

0:20:58.080 --> 0:21:00.639
<v Speaker 2>like evaporated, he'd be fine. But it does evaporated, it

0:21:00.760 --> 0:21:02.760
<v Speaker 2>would be a big problem. On the other hand, he

0:21:02.840 --> 0:21:05.880
<v Speaker 2>hates running a public company. He's not a public company guy.

0:21:06.160 --> 0:21:08.879
<v Speaker 2>It doesn't work. He goes around saying I do not

0:21:08.960 --> 0:21:12.639
<v Speaker 2>respect the SEC. He gets in trouble, he gets sued

0:21:12.680 --> 0:21:16.600
<v Speaker 2>by shareholders. He pushes the boundaries in a way that

0:21:16.720 --> 0:21:18.720
<v Speaker 2>when you have a private company where all of the

0:21:18.760 --> 0:21:22.600
<v Speaker 2>shareholders are your fans and understand that they're there to

0:21:22.640 --> 0:21:24.920
<v Speaker 2>support you, it kind of works. But in a public

0:21:24.920 --> 0:21:26.720
<v Speaker 2>company where anyone can buy stock and then sue you

0:21:27.320 --> 0:21:30.040
<v Speaker 2>and like a judge or the SEC can just get involved,

0:21:30.600 --> 0:21:33.359
<v Speaker 2>it doesn't work that well. And he clearly hates it.

0:21:33.680 --> 0:21:35.840
<v Speaker 2>He sort of tried to take Tesla private in a

0:21:36.440 --> 0:21:38.639
<v Speaker 2>never deel that got him in trouble with the SEC.

0:21:39.320 --> 0:21:42.040
<v Speaker 2>And he's said off and on over the years that

0:21:42.040 --> 0:21:45.760
<v Speaker 2>he hates and running a public company, and will SpaceX

0:21:45.760 --> 0:21:48.680
<v Speaker 2>eventually go public probably but I would love that it's

0:21:48.760 --> 0:21:50.760
<v Speaker 2>possible that it would have gone public before. Now we're

0:21:50.840 --> 0:21:52.800
<v Speaker 2>not run by Elon Musk, who has had a bad

0:21:52.840 --> 0:21:55.600
<v Speaker 2>experience of running public companies. So if he has some

0:21:55.760 --> 0:21:58.000
<v Speaker 2>great idea, does he want to do it at Tesla

0:21:58.080 --> 0:22:02.040
<v Speaker 2>where it's going to be subject to public company's scrutiny,

0:22:02.119 --> 0:22:04.280
<v Speaker 2>or is he gonna want to focus on his other

0:22:04.560 --> 0:22:06.239
<v Speaker 2>companies that he has much more control over.

0:22:06.520 --> 0:22:09.240
<v Speaker 1>It feels like we're heading towards a rubber meets the

0:22:09.400 --> 0:22:12.119
<v Speaker 1>road moment when it comes to the shareholder vote. I mean,

0:22:13.600 --> 0:22:16.639
<v Speaker 1>either it's reapproved and he's a happy man maybe, or

0:22:16.880 --> 0:22:19.359
<v Speaker 1>maybe he leaves and then we as we spoke about

0:22:19.359 --> 0:22:20.920
<v Speaker 1>a few weeks ago, maybe we find out what the

0:22:21.040 --> 0:22:24.600
<v Speaker 1>Musk premium to Tesla actually is and we find out

0:22:24.720 --> 0:22:27.560
<v Speaker 1>I don't know whether Tesla needs Elon Musk at this point,

0:22:27.600 --> 0:22:33.120
<v Speaker 1>whether it would do better with a traditional auto type CEO.

0:22:33.240 --> 0:22:35.320
<v Speaker 1>When you think about I don't know the fact that

0:22:35.440 --> 0:22:38.200
<v Speaker 1>EV demand is drying up for everyone, not just for Tesla.

0:22:38.240 --> 0:22:40.600
<v Speaker 1>It feels like a kind of existential moment for the

0:22:40.640 --> 0:22:41.280
<v Speaker 1>EV market.

0:22:41.600 --> 0:22:43.880
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, it's not clear that his skill set is what's

0:22:43.960 --> 0:22:46.040
<v Speaker 2>really needed at Tesla right now, because it's like a

0:22:46.119 --> 0:22:50.120
<v Speaker 2>mature auto company with auto company problems, and he's off

0:22:50.240 --> 0:22:53.480
<v Speaker 2>putting wires in people's brains. Right, maybe the move is

0:22:53.560 --> 0:22:57.080
<v Speaker 2>in fact for him to step back as CEO, but

0:22:57.200 --> 0:22:59.080
<v Speaker 2>that's hard for thenock price. Like you get a lot

0:22:59.119 --> 0:23:01.840
<v Speaker 2>of valuation premium from the retail investors who love them.

0:23:01.880 --> 0:23:02.920
<v Speaker 2>I mean, that's the other thing about it being a

0:23:02.960 --> 0:23:05.080
<v Speaker 2>public company is it's the only place that his retail

0:23:05.119 --> 0:23:07.960
<v Speaker 2>investors can invest with them. Yeah, you can't buy.

0:23:07.840 --> 0:23:10.040
<v Speaker 1>SpaceX, but you know what a neat solution would be

0:23:10.640 --> 0:23:14.879
<v Speaker 1>taking SpaceX public closed and fun sure and invest in

0:23:14.920 --> 0:23:17.640
<v Speaker 1>all the elon musk companies. We can publicly list it too,

0:23:17.840 --> 0:23:19.400
<v Speaker 1>and that would be really fun to watch.

0:23:19.840 --> 0:23:21.160
<v Speaker 2>That is actually a really good idea.

0:23:21.560 --> 0:23:23.080
<v Speaker 1>Thanks that one's for free, but.

0:23:26.040 --> 0:23:27.119
<v Speaker 2>You get a commission on that one.

0:23:41.359 --> 0:23:42.520
<v Speaker 1>Bill Aang Bill Wang.

0:23:42.840 --> 0:23:45.359
<v Speaker 2>So Bill Wang is on trial for his family office,

0:23:45.440 --> 0:23:49.800
<v Speaker 2>Archie's Capital Management, employed a while back and lost thirty

0:23:49.840 --> 0:23:52.359
<v Speaker 2>something billion dollar fortune for him and billions of dollars

0:23:52.440 --> 0:23:56.480
<v Speaker 2>for several banks, including Credit Suites, which didn't fail because

0:23:56.520 --> 0:23:57.600
<v Speaker 2>of our chagoes.

0:23:57.680 --> 0:23:59.200
<v Speaker 1>But like it's not here anymore.

0:23:59.320 --> 0:24:01.879
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, it didn't didn't help. But he's on trial for

0:24:02.280 --> 0:24:05.479
<v Speaker 2>kind of two things like market manipulation, bottle these stocks

0:24:05.680 --> 0:24:07.680
<v Speaker 2>and pushed them way up and then they crashed when

0:24:07.680 --> 0:24:10.399
<v Speaker 2>he stopped buying them, And for lying to banks, because

0:24:10.440 --> 0:24:12.160
<v Speaker 2>basically he like borrowed a lot of money from banks

0:24:12.200 --> 0:24:15.320
<v Speaker 2>to buy all these stocks, and had the banks known

0:24:15.440 --> 0:24:17.280
<v Speaker 2>the true extent of his positions, they wouldn't have lent

0:24:17.400 --> 0:24:20.640
<v Speaker 2>him all the money. And he's on trial this week,

0:24:21.480 --> 0:24:23.159
<v Speaker 2>and I have to say it seems to be kind

0:24:23.200 --> 0:24:25.119
<v Speaker 2>of going okay for him in the sense that they

0:24:25.160 --> 0:24:28.359
<v Speaker 2>haven't really done the market manipulation case yet, but it

0:24:28.520 --> 0:24:31.200
<v Speaker 2>just sort of sounds like the evidence is like he

0:24:31.320 --> 0:24:34.680
<v Speaker 2>bought a lot of these stocks, which is weird, but

0:24:34.760 --> 0:24:36.960
<v Speaker 2>it is not proof of market manipulation by itself. It

0:24:37.000 --> 0:24:38.960
<v Speaker 2>doesn't seem to be any smoking gun of him being like,

0:24:39.440 --> 0:24:42.960
<v Speaker 2>I'm buying these stocks so that I can like artificially

0:24:43.000 --> 0:24:45.600
<v Speaker 2>inflate their price, so that I can do something. Because

0:24:45.600 --> 0:24:48.119
<v Speaker 2>he didn't do something, they bottle the stocks and then

0:24:48.200 --> 0:24:50.160
<v Speaker 2>they crashed and he lost all his money. He wasn't

0:24:50.240 --> 0:24:52.159
<v Speaker 2>like doing it for some nefarious plan as far as

0:24:52.200 --> 0:24:54.040
<v Speaker 2>I can tell. But the other thing he's on twelve

0:24:54.040 --> 0:24:55.440
<v Speaker 2>for is lining to the banks, and like there was

0:24:55.440 --> 0:24:57.200
<v Speaker 2>definitely some line to the banks. There's a lot of

0:24:57.240 --> 0:24:58.879
<v Speaker 2>testimony that there was lying to the banks, but it

0:24:58.960 --> 0:25:01.360
<v Speaker 2>wasn't from him. It's like from his employees.

0:25:01.480 --> 0:25:04.520
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, so far, we've heard from Scott Becker, for example,

0:25:04.560 --> 0:25:08.959
<v Speaker 1>who was a risk manager at Archagos, and he testified

0:25:09.160 --> 0:25:12.560
<v Speaker 1>that he lied. He told several banks that Archaeos was

0:25:12.600 --> 0:25:17.000
<v Speaker 1>heavily invested in fang stocks like Apple, Amazon, et cetera,

0:25:17.040 --> 0:25:21.520
<v Speaker 1>et cetera. In actuality, actually they were really invested in

0:25:21.640 --> 0:25:25.920
<v Speaker 1>ADRs for companies like ten cents and by Do et cetera.

0:25:26.080 --> 0:25:27.840
<v Speaker 1>That was a large part of the portfolio.

0:25:27.920 --> 0:25:30.960
<v Speaker 2>So that was a lie and he's but also like

0:25:31.240 --> 0:25:35.480
<v Speaker 2>you know, Viacom was like yeah the company or yeah,

0:25:35.960 --> 0:25:38.359
<v Speaker 2>quantities of a few, like a handful of stocks.

0:25:38.520 --> 0:25:41.520
<v Speaker 1>Yeah. But I guess what looks good for Bill Wangs

0:25:41.560 --> 0:25:46.800
<v Speaker 1>so far is that it's not clear that he necessarily

0:25:46.920 --> 0:25:48.000
<v Speaker 1>told those employees.

0:25:48.040 --> 0:25:49.800
<v Speaker 2>There's no email from him being like make sure to

0:25:49.800 --> 0:25:52.439
<v Speaker 2>a lot of the banks, which sometimes in some cases

0:25:52.480 --> 0:25:52.800
<v Speaker 2>they have that.

0:25:53.040 --> 0:25:56.600
<v Speaker 1>Yeah. Yeah, but I mean you raised the point why

0:25:56.680 --> 0:25:57.720
<v Speaker 1>did they lie? Then?

0:25:57.840 --> 0:25:59.879
<v Speaker 2>I was thinking about that. There's a sort of like

0:26:01.280 --> 0:26:04.320
<v Speaker 2>he was the boss, there's some sort of implicit assumption

0:26:04.440 --> 0:26:07.280
<v Speaker 2>of well, if the employees are lying to the banks

0:26:08.359 --> 0:26:10.240
<v Speaker 2>to keep our ke goos going. They were doing it

0:26:10.359 --> 0:26:12.760
<v Speaker 2>because that's what their boss wanted to them, which, first

0:26:12.800 --> 0:26:14.680
<v Speaker 2>of all, I'm not sure is enough for to be

0:26:14.720 --> 0:26:17.000
<v Speaker 2>a crime. But saying I'm not sure that's true, I

0:26:17.080 --> 0:26:19.480
<v Speaker 2>feel like people who have jobs are motivated to do

0:26:19.560 --> 0:26:21.320
<v Speaker 2>a good job at work. It's not like they're like,

0:26:21.800 --> 0:26:24.920
<v Speaker 2>I need to make this trade work at because my

0:26:24.960 --> 0:26:26.399
<v Speaker 2>boss told me to. It's I need to make this

0:26:26.440 --> 0:26:27.920
<v Speaker 2>trade work out because I'm like trying to be a

0:26:27.960 --> 0:26:29.800
<v Speaker 2>good employee. And like, you know, you sort of have

0:26:29.880 --> 0:26:32.480
<v Speaker 2>a general create value. Yeah, you want to create value,

0:26:32.920 --> 0:26:35.360
<v Speaker 2>and you're whatever, you've been at that company for a while,

0:26:35.359 --> 0:26:37.560
<v Speaker 2>and you have some sense of commitment to the company

0:26:37.600 --> 0:26:39.760
<v Speaker 2>in some sense of professional desire to do a good

0:26:39.840 --> 0:26:42.160
<v Speaker 2>job at whatever it is you do, and what you're

0:26:42.200 --> 0:26:46.480
<v Speaker 2>doing is keeping this extremely concentrated portfolio from crashing. Then

0:26:46.520 --> 0:26:48.239
<v Speaker 2>maybe you'll lie to a bank to do that, right,

0:26:48.400 --> 0:26:50.879
<v Speaker 2>And maybe you're just doing it because that's in the

0:26:51.119 --> 0:26:54.480
<v Speaker 2>very short term, the way to improve your own performance,

0:26:54.520 --> 0:26:56.600
<v Speaker 2>and you're just trying to do a good job. So

0:26:57.200 --> 0:26:59.040
<v Speaker 2>is that his fault. I don't know, it's like kind

0:26:59.080 --> 0:26:59.600
<v Speaker 2>of his fault.

0:26:59.640 --> 0:27:02.040
<v Speaker 1>But so for a couple of days into testimony, it

0:27:02.160 --> 0:27:04.600
<v Speaker 1>seems okay ish for bull Wang at the moment just

0:27:04.680 --> 0:27:07.359
<v Speaker 1>to meditate on Scott Becker a little bit longer. He's

0:27:07.400 --> 0:27:10.360
<v Speaker 1>definitely not having a great week or a great last

0:27:10.400 --> 0:27:13.320
<v Speaker 1>couple of weeks. Again, testified, he did say he lied.

0:27:14.400 --> 0:27:19.240
<v Speaker 1>He also apparently texted in twenty eighteen that he hoped

0:27:19.280 --> 0:27:22.000
<v Speaker 1>that his boss would die in a plane crash, and

0:27:22.040 --> 0:27:24.120
<v Speaker 1>then in twenty twenty, I hope that he would die

0:27:24.280 --> 0:27:30.080
<v Speaker 1>a quote slow, painful death from COVID. He said of

0:27:30.240 --> 0:27:33.840
<v Speaker 1>the texts, I obviously regret that it is not.

0:27:33.920 --> 0:27:36.280
<v Speaker 2>Inconsistent with what I said before. You'd be like really

0:27:36.359 --> 0:27:39.160
<v Speaker 2>motivated to do a good job and also have days

0:27:39.200 --> 0:27:41.480
<v Speaker 2>when you which your boss would dine a plane crash.

0:27:42.920 --> 0:27:45.800
<v Speaker 1>I that's why I never want to get sued. I mean,

0:27:45.840 --> 0:27:47.639
<v Speaker 1>for a lot of reasons. I don't want anyone to

0:27:47.720 --> 0:27:50.120
<v Speaker 1>go through my text messages. They're all super clean though.

0:27:50.720 --> 0:27:52.720
<v Speaker 1>But anyway, that was a fun.

0:27:52.680 --> 0:27:55.760
<v Speaker 2>Little through the outs of the Money Stuff podcast.

0:27:55.400 --> 0:27:59.879
<v Speaker 1>Exactly, Uh, we burn every recording, We'd smash it with bats. Anyway,

0:28:00.200 --> 0:28:03.359
<v Speaker 1>that was a fun little detail that came out in testimony.

0:28:03.520 --> 0:28:06.880
<v Speaker 1>Also coming out was the Goldman fat Finger, which wasn't

0:28:06.880 --> 0:28:07.760
<v Speaker 1>previously known.

0:28:07.800 --> 0:28:08.959
<v Speaker 2>I believe it's amazing.

0:28:09.080 --> 0:28:09.840
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, it's amazing.

0:28:10.359 --> 0:28:12.520
<v Speaker 2>At the end of our Chagos, like they had like

0:28:12.760 --> 0:28:15.240
<v Speaker 2>scraps of money at different banks, and like they were

0:28:15.280 --> 0:28:17.440
<v Speaker 2>getting furious margin calls, and they're also trying to buy

0:28:17.520 --> 0:28:19.280
<v Speaker 2>more of these stocks to prop them up, and so

0:28:19.359 --> 0:28:21.359
<v Speaker 2>they were going to every bank and saying, oh, we

0:28:21.400 --> 0:28:23.080
<v Speaker 2>have one hundred million dollars at your bank, send us

0:28:23.080 --> 0:28:25.320
<v Speaker 2>one hundred million dollars. And some banks were doing it

0:28:25.600 --> 0:28:27.680
<v Speaker 2>even though they were like a day away from bankruptcy.

0:28:28.000 --> 0:28:29.639
<v Speaker 2>And so they did that to Golden. They're like, before

0:28:29.640 --> 0:28:31.640
<v Speaker 2>it did seventy million dollars at Goldman, can you send

0:28:31.680 --> 0:28:33.879
<v Speaker 2>it to us, Except they like hit the wrong button

0:28:34.240 --> 0:28:36.960
<v Speaker 2>and instead of asking for ford and seventy million dollars

0:28:36.960 --> 0:28:38.880
<v Speaker 2>from Golden, they sent for hundred and seventy million dollars

0:28:38.920 --> 0:28:40.480
<v Speaker 2>in Golden And then they called govid Or like, hey,

0:28:40.560 --> 0:28:42.520
<v Speaker 2>can we get that money back? And Golvin was like no,

0:28:44.480 --> 0:28:46.000
<v Speaker 2>I sort of they were like, oh, we need to

0:28:46.160 --> 0:28:47.880
<v Speaker 2>Like yeah, they like sort of dragged their feet a

0:28:47.920 --> 0:28:49.720
<v Speaker 2>little bit, and then by the time they stopped dragging

0:28:49.720 --> 0:28:52.080
<v Speaker 2>their feet, like it was clear that our Kegos was

0:28:52.120 --> 0:28:54.040
<v Speaker 2>busted and yeah, Golbyn kept the money.

0:28:53.960 --> 0:28:55.680
<v Speaker 1>Didn't they request a meeting with them.

0:28:55.800 --> 0:28:57.520
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, they were like, yeah, you get at the money back.

0:28:57.600 --> 0:28:59.760
<v Speaker 2>Let's just talk to your chief trader to make sure everything's.

0:28:59.440 --> 0:29:02.239
<v Speaker 1>Okay, right, Like he's busy right now.

0:29:02.600 --> 0:29:04.680
<v Speaker 2>I think anyone if you get a call saying can

0:29:04.720 --> 0:29:07.000
<v Speaker 2>we have all of our money back, you're like, well,

0:29:07.120 --> 0:29:09.960
<v Speaker 2>I think okay. Then Goldman they were just holding four

0:29:10.040 --> 0:29:12.480
<v Speaker 2>hundred and seventy million dollars for them. They were also

0:29:12.720 --> 0:29:16.360
<v Speaker 2>lending them enormous amounts of money against concentrated stock positions.

0:29:16.840 --> 0:29:19.440
<v Speaker 2>And if you're like, oh, our go needs money, your

0:29:19.480 --> 0:29:22.760
<v Speaker 2>next thought is are all these derivatives positions that we

0:29:22.880 --> 0:29:24.280
<v Speaker 2>have with them are they good for them?

0:29:24.480 --> 0:29:24.720
<v Speaker 3>Yeah?

0:29:24.760 --> 0:29:28.440
<v Speaker 2>And the answer was very much no. So Goldman cut

0:29:28.480 --> 0:29:28.840
<v Speaker 2>the money.

0:29:29.280 --> 0:29:33.080
<v Speaker 1>There was testimony from a Jeffreys managing director as well,

0:29:33.120 --> 0:29:35.760
<v Speaker 1>who when she got the call, her reaction was, what's

0:29:35.800 --> 0:29:39.120
<v Speaker 1>the emergency? Like, we need all the money back right now?

0:29:39.960 --> 0:29:41.800
<v Speaker 2>You get a call from your customer being like I

0:29:41.880 --> 0:29:44.640
<v Speaker 2>need every penny in my account wired to me immediately.

0:29:44.920 --> 0:29:46.720
<v Speaker 2>If you're just their bank, maybe you'd do that, right,

0:29:46.840 --> 0:29:49.080
<v Speaker 2>But you also have like an enormous loan out to them,

0:29:49.080 --> 0:29:50.080
<v Speaker 2>and you're like, wait a minute.

0:30:00.880 --> 0:30:01.600
<v Speaker 1>Mail back.

0:30:02.440 --> 0:30:05.600
<v Speaker 2>On this very podcast last week, we talked about, well,

0:30:05.600 --> 0:30:08.040
<v Speaker 2>we talked about several city fat.

0:30:07.840 --> 0:30:11.600
<v Speaker 1>Fingers to be a somewhat regular occurrence, but.

0:30:11.680 --> 0:30:13.680
<v Speaker 2>We talked specifically about the one where they like, they

0:30:13.720 --> 0:30:16.000
<v Speaker 2>sold a ton of European stocks and crashed all the markets,

0:30:16.080 --> 0:30:18.960
<v Speaker 2>and then we're like, oops, we meant to sell fifty

0:30:19.000 --> 0:30:21.000
<v Speaker 2>million dollars, but we sold four hundred and forty billion

0:30:21.040 --> 0:30:24.080
<v Speaker 2>dollars among us? Who among us? Indeed, because every time

0:30:24.120 --> 0:30:25.959
<v Speaker 2>I write or talk about a fat figure, I get

0:30:26.000 --> 0:30:28.240
<v Speaker 2>emails from people about like, yeah, here's my pad finger story.

0:30:28.320 --> 0:30:30.160
<v Speaker 2>I got a good one from a reader. He said

0:30:30.200 --> 0:30:33.280
<v Speaker 2>that he's trading in his personal account. He made some

0:30:33.360 --> 0:30:35.760
<v Speaker 2>money on call options, right, so he bought some call

0:30:35.800 --> 0:30:38.520
<v Speaker 2>options and some stock. He sold the call options. He

0:30:38.600 --> 0:30:40.640
<v Speaker 2>had one hundred thousand dollars, and he says, well, he's

0:30:40.720 --> 0:30:42.040
<v Speaker 2>trying to figure out what to do with the money.

0:30:42.600 --> 0:30:45.600
<v Speaker 2>He decided to put it into the bill ETF, like

0:30:45.640 --> 0:30:48.360
<v Speaker 2>a short term money market ETF. He's like one hundred

0:30:48.360 --> 0:30:51.400
<v Speaker 2>thousand dollars, and he says on his brokerage screen, like

0:30:51.600 --> 0:30:53.560
<v Speaker 2>when you sell an option and then you got to

0:30:53.640 --> 0:30:56.720
<v Speaker 2>do another trade, it defaults to doing an options trade.

0:30:57.160 --> 0:30:58.680
<v Speaker 2>And so he was like, I'm gonna put a hundred

0:30:58.680 --> 0:31:02.280
<v Speaker 2>thousand dollars into bill and instead he bought one hundred

0:31:02.320 --> 0:31:05.600
<v Speaker 2>thousand dollars of call options on the bill money market,

0:31:06.240 --> 0:31:08.880
<v Speaker 2>which is like, there is no more boring investment than

0:31:08.920 --> 0:31:12.640
<v Speaker 2>the billity, but there's no crazier investment than call options

0:31:12.720 --> 0:31:15.520
<v Speaker 2>on the time. Yeah, that's wild. And so he bought

0:31:15.640 --> 0:31:17.360
<v Speaker 2>a lot of the He hit buy on a lot

0:31:17.400 --> 0:31:19.960
<v Speaker 2>of these options, and he said that they executed like

0:31:20.000 --> 0:31:22.080
<v Speaker 2>one contract and moved the market, and he noticed and

0:31:22.160 --> 0:31:24.160
<v Speaker 2>canceled the rest of it and was only a few

0:31:24.240 --> 0:31:24.800
<v Speaker 2>hundred dollars.

0:31:25.160 --> 0:31:27.120
<v Speaker 1>But I thought it was amazing because we were talking

0:31:27.200 --> 0:31:30.200
<v Speaker 1>in relation to the city system, how it was maybe

0:31:30.320 --> 0:31:32.840
<v Speaker 1>just designed poorly. And I mean, here's a great example,

0:31:33.240 --> 0:31:36.160
<v Speaker 1>a real life example of a person in their personal

0:31:36.200 --> 0:31:41.280
<v Speaker 1>account falling victim to maybe an unintuitive trading screen, right right.

0:31:42.600 --> 0:31:45.280
<v Speaker 2>If I were designing a trading system, I would probably

0:31:45.440 --> 0:31:49.360
<v Speaker 2>make it default to trading cash, not options, every trade.

0:31:49.520 --> 0:31:52.400
<v Speaker 2>So of course, if I were a retail broker, I

0:31:52.440 --> 0:31:54.800
<v Speaker 2>would want to encourage as much option trading as possible,

0:31:54.800 --> 0:31:56.960
<v Speaker 2>because that's how the retail brokers make money, so maybe

0:31:57.000 --> 0:31:58.960
<v Speaker 2>I would, you know, maybe I would encourage.

0:31:59.240 --> 0:32:02.360
<v Speaker 1>I would want the text to be as big as possible,

0:32:02.480 --> 0:32:04.880
<v Speaker 1>like a really large font size. Those always make me

0:32:04.960 --> 0:32:07.080
<v Speaker 1>feel safe. Anyway, time to go.

0:32:08.240 --> 0:32:09.440
<v Speaker 2>How's the Money Stuff Podcast?

0:32:09.600 --> 0:32:10.760
<v Speaker 1>I don't have my script?

0:32:11.840 --> 0:32:13.920
<v Speaker 2>And that was the Money Stuff Podcast. I'm Matt Levian

0:32:14.080 --> 0:32:18.960
<v Speaker 2>and I'm Katy Gray. We're not actually doing that, and

0:32:19.080 --> 0:32:20.360
<v Speaker 2>that was the Money Stuff Podcast.

0:32:20.560 --> 0:32:22.480
<v Speaker 1>I'm Matt Levian and I'm Katie Greifeld.

0:32:24.360 --> 0:32:26.400
<v Speaker 2>You can find my work by subscribing to the money

0:32:26.400 --> 0:32:27.360
<v Speaker 2>Stuff newsletter on the.

0:32:27.360 --> 0:32:30.000
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg dot com, and you can find me on Bloomberg

0:32:30.040 --> 0:32:32.640
<v Speaker 1>TV every day between ten to eleven am Eastern.

0:32:33.000 --> 0:32:34.600
<v Speaker 2>We'd love to hear from you, and you can send

0:32:34.600 --> 0:32:37.840
<v Speaker 2>an email to Moneypod at Bloomberg dot net. Ask us

0:32:37.880 --> 0:32:39.360
<v Speaker 2>a question and we might answer it on air.

0:32:40.320 --> 0:32:42.440
<v Speaker 1>You can also subscribe to our show wherever you're listening

0:32:42.560 --> 0:32:44.560
<v Speaker 1>right now and leave us a review. It helps more

0:32:44.600 --> 0:32:45.440
<v Speaker 1>people find the show.

0:32:46.520 --> 0:32:49.720
<v Speaker 2>The Money Stuff Podcast is produced by Anamasaracus and Moses

0:32:49.760 --> 0:32:50.120
<v Speaker 2>on Them.

0:32:50.360 --> 0:32:52.400
<v Speaker 1>Our theme music was composed by Blake Naples.

0:32:52.880 --> 0:32:55.520
<v Speaker 2>Brandon Francis Newnham is our executive producer.

0:32:55.560 --> 0:32:57.720
<v Speaker 1>And Sage Ballman is Bloomberg's head of podcasts.

0:32:58.240 --> 0:33:00.560
<v Speaker 2>Thanks for listening to the Money Stuff podcast. We'll be

0:33:00.640 --> 0:33:02.080
<v Speaker 2>back next week with more stuff.