WEBVTT - When ETFs Stop Working

0:00:05.840 --> 0:00:14.200
<v Speaker 1>Welcome the Trillions. I'm Joel Weber and I'm America Cultures. Eric.

0:00:14.200 --> 0:00:17.799
<v Speaker 1>Where you coming to us from today? I am live

0:00:17.920 --> 0:00:21.319
<v Speaker 1>from the thirtieth three station in Philadelphia, Uh, famous for

0:00:21.480 --> 0:00:24.200
<v Speaker 1>when they see film the last scene of Trading places.

0:00:24.880 --> 0:00:27.120
<v Speaker 1>UM actually on my way up to New York or

0:00:27.120 --> 0:00:30.480
<v Speaker 1>a client panel discussion at three thirty. And this is

0:00:30.520 --> 0:00:32.600
<v Speaker 1>the only way we can pull us off to accommodate

0:00:32.680 --> 0:00:36.440
<v Speaker 1>the great Katie Garifeld. So in the first you're gonna

0:00:36.440 --> 0:00:39.080
<v Speaker 1>be sitting on the ground at a train station for

0:00:39.159 --> 0:00:42.960
<v Speaker 1>us as we record trillions where it's really like the

0:00:42.960 --> 0:00:45.279
<v Speaker 1>world is in war mode right now, Eric, if if

0:00:45.320 --> 0:00:48.040
<v Speaker 1>you're if, it's come to this UM, and there's some

0:00:48.080 --> 0:00:51.159
<v Speaker 1>significant events that have been happening in ets that we're

0:00:51.159 --> 0:00:55.360
<v Speaker 1>going to talk about on today's episode. What's been happening? Yeah,

0:00:55.440 --> 0:00:57.760
<v Speaker 1>it's been pretty wild. Like you know, e T s

0:00:57.800 --> 0:01:00.520
<v Speaker 1>are are like cockroaches. I mean, they can trade through anything,

0:01:00.920 --> 0:01:03.880
<v Speaker 1>and they have even when the underlying is frozen. But

0:01:04.680 --> 0:01:08.240
<v Speaker 1>we had a situation with Russia where the underlying was

0:01:08.319 --> 0:01:12.520
<v Speaker 1>frozen effectively and then also the e t F stopped trading.

0:01:12.959 --> 0:01:15.559
<v Speaker 1>That's a new one. We've really never seen that before.

0:01:16.160 --> 0:01:18.840
<v Speaker 1>It's really an important one to discussed because where does

0:01:18.840 --> 0:01:21.959
<v Speaker 1>the sleeve investors and what should you think about going forward?

0:01:22.040 --> 0:01:24.319
<v Speaker 1>And then the other one is b x X, which

0:01:24.400 --> 0:01:29.679
<v Speaker 1>is a fixed et N, which is Barclay's halted creations

0:01:29.720 --> 0:01:33.000
<v Speaker 1>on that which it's still trades, but without creations, arbitrage

0:01:33.080 --> 0:01:35.240
<v Speaker 1>is basically destroyed. And so the price d v H

0:01:35.319 --> 0:01:37.520
<v Speaker 1>and the n A V and that causes problems and

0:01:37.560 --> 0:01:40.119
<v Speaker 1>that we've seen before. That's sort of a classic. I'm

0:01:40.160 --> 0:01:42.440
<v Speaker 1>a big bank, I don't feel like offering this anymore.

0:01:42.520 --> 0:01:45.199
<v Speaker 1>Let me just all creations and that's annoying. I think.

0:01:45.560 --> 0:01:47.400
<v Speaker 1>I think there are two different situations, but they both

0:01:47.400 --> 0:01:49.800
<v Speaker 1>speak to this idea of when the E t F

0:01:49.920 --> 0:01:53.560
<v Speaker 1>stops uh doing what it does and I wouldn't say

0:01:53.600 --> 0:01:56.360
<v Speaker 1>broken is the right word, but becomes impaired. Uh you know,

0:01:56.640 --> 0:01:59.680
<v Speaker 1>how does that work? What happens? Joining us will be

0:01:59.800 --> 0:02:03.320
<v Speaker 1>Key d Grindfield of Bloomberg News. She's also the co

0:02:03.400 --> 0:02:06.840
<v Speaker 1>host of the newly launched relaunched E t F i

0:02:06.960 --> 0:02:10.239
<v Speaker 1>Q Show as well as David Nodded with E t

0:02:10.400 --> 0:02:15.880
<v Speaker 1>F Trends, this time on trillions. When E t F

0:02:16.040 --> 0:02:22.320
<v Speaker 1>s stop working, Katie Dave Welcome back to the program.

0:02:22.360 --> 0:02:24.440
<v Speaker 1>Thanks for having me, Thanks for having me too. I

0:02:24.480 --> 0:02:27.720
<v Speaker 1>feel bad, Eric that you had to change things around

0:02:27.760 --> 0:02:32.000
<v Speaker 1>to accommodate me because I don't have a lot of answers. Listen,

0:02:32.000 --> 0:02:35.639
<v Speaker 1>you're very busy, and you look I am happy to

0:02:35.720 --> 0:02:40.160
<v Speaker 1>accommodate you. You just don't look comfortable. Well I'm not.

0:02:40.280 --> 0:02:44.000
<v Speaker 1>I'm I'm sitting Indian style on marble and I'm about

0:02:44.080 --> 0:02:47.200
<v Speaker 1>four feet from a dunkin Donuts kitchen. So but this

0:02:47.280 --> 0:02:50.919
<v Speaker 1>is natural habitat for Eric. He kind of is back

0:02:50.919 --> 0:02:53.240
<v Speaker 1>in the day. Maybe you're gonna have to stretch your

0:02:53.280 --> 0:02:56.080
<v Speaker 1>hip flexors after. Can I just say one quick thing

0:02:56.080 --> 0:02:59.919
<v Speaker 1>about dunkin Donuts pretty pandemic. I would get the same

0:03:00.040 --> 0:03:03.400
<v Speaker 1>breakfast here and then two years pasted because the pandemic,

0:03:03.440 --> 0:03:05.519
<v Speaker 1>and then, as you mentioned, e t F I two started.

0:03:05.680 --> 0:03:08.119
<v Speaker 1>I came back here on Monday two years later, got

0:03:08.160 --> 0:03:11.040
<v Speaker 1>the same thing and it was actually a hair cheaper.

0:03:14.320 --> 0:03:17.280
<v Speaker 1>Although somebody asked me to weigh the food. I was like,

0:03:17.320 --> 0:03:19.320
<v Speaker 1>come on, I don't think. I don't think they're doing that,

0:03:19.360 --> 0:03:21.520
<v Speaker 1>but I think don't donut. That's why the popular I

0:03:21.520 --> 0:03:24.760
<v Speaker 1>think they are able to be more efficient. But anyway,

0:03:24.840 --> 0:03:28.320
<v Speaker 1>interesting tidbits there. I could say many things, and we're

0:03:28.360 --> 0:03:32.360
<v Speaker 1>just gonna ignore that and move on. Um Katie, can

0:03:32.440 --> 0:03:35.240
<v Speaker 1>we start with you what has been happening, because you've

0:03:35.280 --> 0:03:38.000
<v Speaker 1>basically been on the front lines of the past few

0:03:38.200 --> 0:03:42.400
<v Speaker 1>weeks as as all of these things have transpired, it's

0:03:42.400 --> 0:03:45.600
<v Speaker 1>been pretty wild. I mean, it's been a roller coaster

0:03:45.640 --> 0:03:46.920
<v Speaker 1>a few weeks, and I feel like a lot of

0:03:46.920 --> 0:03:49.360
<v Speaker 1>the action has been centered on a bunch of e

0:03:49.440 --> 0:03:51.480
<v Speaker 1>t f s that aren't trading anymore. All of these

0:03:51.600 --> 0:03:55.800
<v Speaker 1>um US listed Russian focused e t f s. Obviously,

0:03:55.840 --> 0:03:58.680
<v Speaker 1>the Van Neck Russia et F was sort of where

0:03:58.760 --> 0:04:01.800
<v Speaker 1>all of this action was concentrated. But I mean, as

0:04:01.960 --> 0:04:05.280
<v Speaker 1>Eric alluded to, none, none of these et fs virtually,

0:04:05.320 --> 0:04:08.760
<v Speaker 1>I think that's correct, are trading anymore. But before that happened,

0:04:08.760 --> 0:04:11.880
<v Speaker 1>I mean, you saw a lot of flows into these funds.

0:04:11.880 --> 0:04:15.600
<v Speaker 1>It's unclear whether that was a create to lens situation,

0:04:15.600 --> 0:04:18.119
<v Speaker 1>people trying to short it. You also saw options volume

0:04:18.200 --> 0:04:20.359
<v Speaker 1>take off on a lot of these funds, including a

0:04:20.400 --> 0:04:23.240
<v Speaker 1>fund I think it was a direction fund that announced

0:04:23.279 --> 0:04:26.960
<v Speaker 1>that it would liquidate and it was a leverage fund.

0:04:26.960 --> 0:04:31.080
<v Speaker 1>And you saw again options contracts just explode in volume,

0:04:31.120 --> 0:04:33.240
<v Speaker 1>which we now know, and I'm sure we'll get into

0:04:33.680 --> 0:04:38.120
<v Speaker 1>it's unclear whether those holders will actually be paid out. Okay, Eric,

0:04:38.240 --> 0:04:40.440
<v Speaker 1>One of the e t F s that we want

0:04:40.480 --> 0:04:42.960
<v Speaker 1>to focus on is called r s X, which is

0:04:43.000 --> 0:04:45.039
<v Speaker 1>the van X Russia e t F. What happened with

0:04:45.080 --> 0:04:48.960
<v Speaker 1>that one? Yeah, essentially actually RSX and all of the

0:04:49.040 --> 0:04:54.080
<v Speaker 1>politic creations, that's not that abnormal. Back ten years ago

0:04:54.200 --> 0:04:57.480
<v Speaker 1>the Egypt et F pltic creations, when the stock exchange

0:04:57.800 --> 0:05:00.400
<v Speaker 1>was closed for like two months, we've seen the before.

0:05:00.480 --> 0:05:02.920
<v Speaker 1>We figured, oh, they'll just trade through. But the difference

0:05:02.960 --> 0:05:06.680
<v Speaker 1>here is this is serious government stuff sanctions. Also, the

0:05:06.720 --> 0:05:10.080
<v Speaker 1>stocks stopped trading, the g d rs on those stocks

0:05:10.360 --> 0:05:13.400
<v Speaker 1>stopped trading, and it became a much more like the

0:05:13.400 --> 0:05:15.839
<v Speaker 1>e t F was thrust into a geopolitical situation, which

0:05:15.839 --> 0:05:19.440
<v Speaker 1>it wasn't in the Egypt case. And so I'll actually

0:05:19.440 --> 0:05:22.000
<v Speaker 1>turn over to Dave because what was different this case

0:05:22.080 --> 0:05:25.599
<v Speaker 1>is the exchanges nicely and cbo E said we're not

0:05:25.600 --> 0:05:28.000
<v Speaker 1>actually gonna get trade it either, and that was new.

0:05:28.040 --> 0:05:30.279
<v Speaker 1>I've never seen that. Normally e t s trade through anything,

0:05:30.279 --> 0:05:33.680
<v Speaker 1>even if the underlying is frozen, and nobody writes about

0:05:33.760 --> 0:05:37.800
<v Speaker 1>mechanics and busted mechanics better than Dave, So I would

0:05:37.839 --> 0:05:40.159
<v Speaker 1>like to get his take on just what he saw

0:05:40.240 --> 0:05:44.640
<v Speaker 1>and what he thinks, uh, sort of happened behind the scenes. Well, well,

0:05:44.720 --> 0:05:46.599
<v Speaker 1>Joel was sort of saying before we got started that

0:05:46.600 --> 0:05:48.440
<v Speaker 1>you only have me on when the car crash happens.

0:05:48.520 --> 0:05:51.800
<v Speaker 1>So it does feel a little bit like that. I mean,

0:05:51.839 --> 0:05:54.720
<v Speaker 1>you're right that this time was very different, and really

0:05:55.000 --> 0:05:57.000
<v Speaker 1>it comes down to the sanctions. I think if you

0:05:57.000 --> 0:05:58.800
<v Speaker 1>want to trace it all the way back, it's not

0:05:58.920 --> 0:06:02.080
<v Speaker 1>so much that the moss Go Exchange closed for business,

0:06:02.120 --> 0:06:04.640
<v Speaker 1>because that's as you pointed out, that happened in Greece,

0:06:04.680 --> 0:06:07.719
<v Speaker 1>that happened in Egypt. But in both those cases there

0:06:07.760 --> 0:06:11.320
<v Speaker 1>was a really legitimate expectation that those markets would reopen,

0:06:11.440 --> 0:06:14.159
<v Speaker 1>they might price differently, right, that the Arab spring could

0:06:14.160 --> 0:06:16.280
<v Speaker 1>have gone a couple of different ways. But I don't

0:06:16.320 --> 0:06:18.719
<v Speaker 1>think anybody was expecting that somehow, you know, all of

0:06:18.760 --> 0:06:22.240
<v Speaker 1>the companies listed, we're going to disappear. What happened with

0:06:22.279 --> 0:06:25.560
<v Speaker 1>the sanctions kind of created this, I think, this cascading problem,

0:06:25.640 --> 0:06:29.320
<v Speaker 1>which is once it became impossible for the Russian companies

0:06:29.320 --> 0:06:32.960
<v Speaker 1>to actually do business as securities anymore, meaning that they

0:06:33.000 --> 0:06:36.960
<v Speaker 1>could pay dividends, that they could pay their their bond servicing,

0:06:37.000 --> 0:06:39.600
<v Speaker 1>all of that stuff. When that became a problem, it

0:06:39.640 --> 0:06:42.280
<v Speaker 1>was really just a ticking time bomb for when the

0:06:42.480 --> 0:06:46.320
<v Speaker 1>LS the London Stock Exchange would effectively have to suspend

0:06:46.400 --> 0:06:48.880
<v Speaker 1>the g d rs and the vast majority of Russian

0:06:48.880 --> 0:06:52.160
<v Speaker 1>stocks that people trade trade in London as g drs,

0:06:52.200 --> 0:06:53.960
<v Speaker 1>not in New York as a d r s, and

0:06:54.040 --> 0:06:57.279
<v Speaker 1>not in Moscow directly. So once that happened, which was

0:06:57.320 --> 0:07:00.520
<v Speaker 1>almost instantaneous, that in the early round of sanctions, that

0:07:00.520 --> 0:07:02.200
<v Speaker 1>it was going to be impossible for these companies to

0:07:02.279 --> 0:07:06.599
<v Speaker 1>actually do business as global public securities. UM. I actually

0:07:06.680 --> 0:07:09.560
<v Speaker 1>think they've waited about a day late. I predicted on Wednesday,

0:07:09.560 --> 0:07:12.320
<v Speaker 1>two weeks ago that they would actually um either delist

0:07:12.520 --> 0:07:14.760
<v Speaker 1>or suspend the g d r s. They haven't actually

0:07:14.800 --> 0:07:16.720
<v Speaker 1>delisted them yet. I think that will be the next

0:07:16.800 --> 0:07:19.480
<v Speaker 1>you to drop, at which point those no longer become

0:07:19.520 --> 0:07:22.880
<v Speaker 1>investible securities, regardless of whether the market reopens if they

0:07:22.880 --> 0:07:26.720
<v Speaker 1>get delisted off the LC. So with no underlying security

0:07:26.720 --> 0:07:31.600
<v Speaker 1>that anybody had faith in anymore, you know, pausing for

0:07:31.960 --> 0:07:34.320
<v Speaker 1>halting creations and that you basically had to do that

0:07:34.400 --> 0:07:36.440
<v Speaker 1>because there was no way to roll up a basket

0:07:36.480 --> 0:07:39.200
<v Speaker 1>of securities anymore to do a creation and then the

0:07:39.280 --> 0:07:42.480
<v Speaker 1>suspension of trading. That really comes down to the obligation

0:07:42.720 --> 0:07:45.960
<v Speaker 1>of the exchanges themselves to ensure that they can make

0:07:46.040 --> 0:07:48.920
<v Speaker 1>orderly markets. Right, That's that's there on the hook for

0:07:48.960 --> 0:07:52.080
<v Speaker 1>that if they let something trade knowing that it's going

0:07:52.120 --> 0:07:54.440
<v Speaker 1>to be you know, hitting the limit up, limit down

0:07:54.520 --> 0:07:57.680
<v Speaker 1>every eight seconds all day long because nobody has any

0:07:57.720 --> 0:08:00.560
<v Speaker 1>idea how to deal with pricing that is on exchange

0:08:00.560 --> 0:08:02.160
<v Speaker 1>a little bit, so you know, we didn't get it

0:08:02.160 --> 0:08:05.280
<v Speaker 1>completely synchronized. I think RSX closed for trading a day

0:08:05.320 --> 0:08:08.840
<v Speaker 1>after E r U S. But but fundamentally you end

0:08:08.920 --> 0:08:11.600
<v Speaker 1>up in the same position, which is you have uninvestable markets.

0:08:11.720 --> 0:08:15.240
<v Speaker 1>That's what's different this time, Dave. And the pantheon of problems,

0:08:15.400 --> 0:08:17.320
<v Speaker 1>which is sort of how I think about you. You're

0:08:17.320 --> 0:08:18.880
<v Speaker 1>you're gonna be the red phone on the desk now

0:08:18.920 --> 0:08:22.160
<v Speaker 1>for trillions and the pantheon of problems. Where do you

0:08:22.240 --> 0:08:27.160
<v Speaker 1>rank this in terms of et F history? Oh predates right,

0:08:27.240 --> 0:08:29.560
<v Speaker 1>So the last time we can point to anything like

0:08:29.640 --> 0:08:33.080
<v Speaker 1>this um is either Cuba or ran both before you know,

0:08:33.120 --> 0:08:35.320
<v Speaker 1>both in the seventies and eight in the sixties prior

0:08:35.360 --> 0:08:37.600
<v Speaker 1>to that, um, which was the last time we actually

0:08:37.679 --> 0:08:40.000
<v Speaker 1>had the opportunity to look at the market and say,

0:08:40.160 --> 0:08:42.040
<v Speaker 1>this just might not exist when we get out the

0:08:42.080 --> 0:08:45.200
<v Speaker 1>other side of this crisis. UM. Now, I actually don't

0:08:45.240 --> 0:08:47.280
<v Speaker 1>think we end up in a world where they actually

0:08:47.320 --> 0:08:50.200
<v Speaker 1>just obviate all foreign ownership in Russia. But that's on

0:08:50.240 --> 0:08:54.040
<v Speaker 1>the table. They're already talking about taking over local assets

0:08:54.080 --> 0:08:56.560
<v Speaker 1>of foreign companies that have pulled out. I think it's

0:08:56.600 --> 0:08:58.760
<v Speaker 1>really just a matter of time before they say and

0:08:58.800 --> 0:09:02.520
<v Speaker 1>we're also obviating for ownership of the of the companies themselves,

0:09:02.960 --> 0:09:05.960
<v Speaker 1>at which point, literally those stocks go to zero, right,

0:09:06.000 --> 0:09:09.440
<v Speaker 1>those properties get written to nothing, which is incidentally what

0:09:09.559 --> 0:09:12.240
<v Speaker 1>happened in Iran, and it is what happened in Cuba,

0:09:12.280 --> 0:09:14.080
<v Speaker 1>which were the only two times in history I guess

0:09:14.120 --> 0:09:17.080
<v Speaker 1>nineteen seventeen and Russia again. Uh, those the only times

0:09:17.080 --> 0:09:18.720
<v Speaker 1>in history that I know that this has happened. So

0:09:18.760 --> 0:09:22.040
<v Speaker 1>it pre dates the et F structure. So if I'm

0:09:22.080 --> 0:09:26.640
<v Speaker 1>a shareholder and I'm looking at that, this seems really bad. Yeah. Yeah,

0:09:26.720 --> 0:09:29.040
<v Speaker 1>if you're sitting here with RSX in your SWAB account

0:09:29.160 --> 0:09:32.680
<v Speaker 1>right now, Uh, the very very high likelihood is that

0:09:32.760 --> 0:09:35.439
<v Speaker 1>you're going to get some very small percentage of your

0:09:35.440 --> 0:09:39.439
<v Speaker 1>money back when RSX finally closes, when they finally liquidated

0:09:39.440 --> 0:09:41.880
<v Speaker 1>it um, and you know it does have some cash.

0:09:42.000 --> 0:09:44.920
<v Speaker 1>They did what they could to raise what money they

0:09:44.920 --> 0:09:47.760
<v Speaker 1>could while those markets were still trading. But at the

0:09:47.840 --> 0:09:49.800
<v Speaker 1>end of the day, the price you see, you know,

0:09:49.840 --> 0:09:51.840
<v Speaker 1>the price you last saw, is pretty close to what

0:09:51.880 --> 0:09:54.880
<v Speaker 1>you might get, probably even less. Uh. And you know,

0:09:55.000 --> 0:09:57.160
<v Speaker 1>as we as you guys mentioned in the beginning, I

0:09:57.200 --> 0:09:59.240
<v Speaker 1>actually can't even predict what they're going to do with

0:09:59.280 --> 0:10:03.680
<v Speaker 1>the options market, because that's crazy, because the options market

0:10:03.679 --> 0:10:06.040
<v Speaker 1>now has no way to settle. You mentioned a word,

0:10:06.040 --> 0:10:07.920
<v Speaker 1>their liquid It's a big scary word, and I was

0:10:07.960 --> 0:10:10.560
<v Speaker 1>going to ask, I mean, how does this end, these

0:10:10.640 --> 0:10:14.120
<v Speaker 1>these e t f s where where trading has been halted,

0:10:14.800 --> 0:10:18.160
<v Speaker 1>Can that be unhalted or do you see this ending

0:10:18.360 --> 0:10:21.760
<v Speaker 1>eventually in liquidation. I only think that you'll see the

0:10:21.840 --> 0:10:25.199
<v Speaker 1>Russian e t f s resume normal trading when you

0:10:25.320 --> 0:10:29.240
<v Speaker 1>see the underlying markets resume normal trading. And I'm very,

0:10:29.400 --> 0:10:32.920
<v Speaker 1>very skeptical that that's going to happen for US investors.

0:10:32.960 --> 0:10:35.680
<v Speaker 1>For for a forty act fund um. I actually think

0:10:35.679 --> 0:10:39.080
<v Speaker 1>it is more likely at this point that those markets

0:10:39.160 --> 0:10:43.600
<v Speaker 1>become truly uninvestable, and that even should Moscow reopen, the

0:10:43.760 --> 0:10:46.200
<v Speaker 1>London will have to delist all those securities on the

0:10:46.240 --> 0:10:48.959
<v Speaker 1>GDR market and nobody's gonna want to own the underlying s.

0:10:49.000 --> 0:10:51.479
<v Speaker 1>E R U S had a lot of the direct underlyings.

0:10:51.520 --> 0:10:53.200
<v Speaker 1>They moved in the last couple of days to put

0:10:53.240 --> 0:10:54.559
<v Speaker 1>more of the A d r s and g d

0:10:54.679 --> 0:10:57.000
<v Speaker 1>rs on the books. But even if that reopens, at

0:10:57.000 --> 0:10:58.720
<v Speaker 1>this point, it won't have I don't think we'll have

0:10:58.760 --> 0:11:00.560
<v Speaker 1>those securities on the books any more. I think it'll

0:11:00.600 --> 0:11:09.319
<v Speaker 1>be mostly cash. So let's say I hold r s X.

0:11:10.200 --> 0:11:12.439
<v Speaker 1>A lot of people actually bought it after all this happened.

0:11:12.679 --> 0:11:14.480
<v Speaker 1>Let's say they're training at three or four dollars. They

0:11:14.520 --> 0:11:16.880
<v Speaker 1>bought it at five six whatever it was low. It

0:11:16.920 --> 0:11:19.400
<v Speaker 1>was four months ago, so it's they're looking, Hey, it's

0:11:19.400 --> 0:11:21.599
<v Speaker 1>a bargain you own that. E t F. Wouldn't you

0:11:21.720 --> 0:11:26.920
<v Speaker 1>rather just have everybody sitting limbo until something gets resolved,

0:11:26.920 --> 0:11:29.320
<v Speaker 1>even if that's two or three years, rather than really

0:11:29.320 --> 0:11:32.440
<v Speaker 1>get nothing. Yeah, I don't think you'll see them just

0:11:32.679 --> 0:11:36.040
<v Speaker 1>decide like next Thursday, to roll up the fund. I

0:11:36.080 --> 0:11:38.520
<v Speaker 1>do think you'll you'll see both. I mean, really, we're

0:11:38.520 --> 0:11:40.480
<v Speaker 1>just talking about black Rock and Van Neck here. I

0:11:40.480 --> 0:11:43.000
<v Speaker 1>think you'll see them. Wait until there's a shoe going

0:11:43.080 --> 0:11:45.800
<v Speaker 1>to drop right, whether either we you know, pass a

0:11:45.800 --> 0:11:48.439
<v Speaker 1>piece of legislation that makes this permanent in terms of

0:11:48.480 --> 0:11:52.360
<v Speaker 1>the sanctions, or Moscow does something to sort of obviate ownership,

0:11:52.559 --> 0:11:54.280
<v Speaker 1>or the l s D lists all the g d

0:11:54.480 --> 0:11:56.800
<v Speaker 1>r s, one of those kinds of events I think

0:11:56.840 --> 0:11:59.720
<v Speaker 1>has to happen first. You're right right now, Today is

0:11:59.720 --> 0:12:02.440
<v Speaker 1>not a day to close down this fund and hand

0:12:02.440 --> 0:12:04.679
<v Speaker 1>everybody back a buck on their dollar, you know, you know,

0:12:04.720 --> 0:12:07.679
<v Speaker 1>a buck on their fifty dollar investment or whatever's left over. Um,

0:12:07.800 --> 0:12:10.520
<v Speaker 1>why why would you do that? So one thing I

0:12:10.600 --> 0:12:12.720
<v Speaker 1>think is you need to be a little cautious of though,

0:12:12.800 --> 0:12:15.200
<v Speaker 1>is I think the idea that these are somehow cheap

0:12:15.240 --> 0:12:18.200
<v Speaker 1>lottery tickets is really dumb. Like I don't think that

0:12:18.240 --> 0:12:20.319
<v Speaker 1>you can look at the price of gas Prom when

0:12:20.360 --> 0:12:24.320
<v Speaker 1>it reopens as some universal lottery ticket, because all assets

0:12:24.400 --> 0:12:27.400
<v Speaker 1>must eventually be worth something. I think we're seeing a

0:12:27.440 --> 0:12:30.960
<v Speaker 1>big shift in the fundamental economic order that's going on.

0:12:31.040 --> 0:12:33.640
<v Speaker 1>So I think that's a that's a bad call. Russia

0:12:33.760 --> 0:12:36.360
<v Speaker 1>is not the land of meme stock, No, I don't

0:12:36.360 --> 0:12:41.040
<v Speaker 1>think so. So on the lottery tickets ideas, I remember

0:12:41.120 --> 0:12:43.960
<v Speaker 1>reporting on the fact that you saw that huge explosion

0:12:44.600 --> 0:12:47.320
<v Speaker 1>both input and call volume, and it was described to

0:12:47.360 --> 0:12:50.520
<v Speaker 1>me as just that cheap lottery tickets. And I mean,

0:12:50.559 --> 0:12:53.440
<v Speaker 1>assuming that e t f s hadn't stopped working, I mean,

0:12:53.559 --> 0:12:56.880
<v Speaker 1>especially for those put contracts, I mean it seems like

0:12:56.920 --> 0:12:58.880
<v Speaker 1>they would have paid off though that actually that wouldn't

0:12:58.880 --> 0:13:02.520
<v Speaker 1>have been such a bad lottery ticket. Oh and I mean, Eric,

0:13:02.559 --> 0:13:04.040
<v Speaker 1>you wrote about this the other day, right, I mean,

0:13:04.040 --> 0:13:07.960
<v Speaker 1>there's actually a fairly substantial put heavy position that's due

0:13:07.960 --> 0:13:10.880
<v Speaker 1>to settle what tomorrow I think on Thursday. I think

0:13:10.880 --> 0:13:13.559
<v Speaker 1>that's right, nineties six million dollars or something like that,

0:13:13.640 --> 0:13:15.920
<v Speaker 1>most of it on the put side that that should

0:13:15.960 --> 0:13:17.839
<v Speaker 1>be in the money, Like to your point, that should

0:13:17.840 --> 0:13:19.400
<v Speaker 1>be a lot of that should be in the money.

0:13:19.440 --> 0:13:21.720
<v Speaker 1>But because the o c C changed how they're doing

0:13:21.760 --> 0:13:24.000
<v Speaker 1>the settlement where it's now I think has to be directed,

0:13:24.080 --> 0:13:25.600
<v Speaker 1>meaning you have to go in and say yes, I'm

0:13:25.600 --> 0:13:29.440
<v Speaker 1>willing to do I think a cash settlement on this um.

0:13:29.480 --> 0:13:30.720
<v Speaker 1>I think there are a lot of folks that are

0:13:30.720 --> 0:13:34.199
<v Speaker 1>gonna let these expire with the opportunity to have gotten

0:13:34.200 --> 0:13:37.360
<v Speaker 1>money out of them, and and that's gonna that's problematic.

0:13:37.840 --> 0:13:40.400
<v Speaker 1>That's not on like van AK, that's kind of on

0:13:40.440 --> 0:13:43.440
<v Speaker 1>the O C C or CBO maybe, but like even there,

0:13:43.720 --> 0:13:46.440
<v Speaker 1>we are in pretty untested territory. So I think it's

0:13:46.440 --> 0:13:49.920
<v Speaker 1>tough to point fingers. By the way, Dave, you mentioned

0:13:49.920 --> 0:13:55.240
<v Speaker 1>the Barclay's of UH fund. That's v xx and e

0:13:55.360 --> 0:13:59.880
<v Speaker 1>t N. What's different about that circumstance than the rs

0:14:00.240 --> 0:14:02.920
<v Speaker 1>X one. Yeah, so totally different way that E T

0:14:03.160 --> 0:14:05.320
<v Speaker 1>s UM sort of broke down a little bit over

0:14:05.360 --> 0:14:08.600
<v Speaker 1>the last couple of weeks, so um vxx for very

0:14:08.640 --> 0:14:11.520
<v Speaker 1>different reasons. Vxx is an exchange trade note i E.

0:14:11.640 --> 0:14:13.880
<v Speaker 1>It's a piece of bank debt issued by Barkley's Bank,

0:14:13.960 --> 0:14:17.680
<v Speaker 1>tracking first and second month volatility futures. It's the most

0:14:17.720 --> 0:14:20.760
<v Speaker 1>popular e T F where E T P I should

0:14:20.760 --> 0:14:24.720
<v Speaker 1>say tracking volatility. It's sort of the traders darling sitting

0:14:24.760 --> 0:14:28.480
<v Speaker 1>on about a billion dollars um and they suspended creations

0:14:28.520 --> 0:14:31.200
<v Speaker 1>on it, which we've seen over and over again from

0:14:31.240 --> 0:14:33.840
<v Speaker 1>E t N issue wers over the last decade um

0:14:33.880 --> 0:14:36.080
<v Speaker 1>to the point where you know, I know you guys,

0:14:36.120 --> 0:14:37.920
<v Speaker 1>now give it a you know, a red a red

0:14:38.320 --> 0:14:41.560
<v Speaker 1>traffic light in every situation. Um. And this is one

0:14:41.560 --> 0:14:43.480
<v Speaker 1>of the big reasons, because it is a little bit

0:14:43.480 --> 0:14:45.440
<v Speaker 1>of you know, a fit of peak that the bank

0:14:45.520 --> 0:14:47.520
<v Speaker 1>can just decide they have too much risk on the

0:14:47.560 --> 0:14:51.120
<v Speaker 1>books and decide to stop issuing new shares, which causes

0:14:51.160 --> 0:14:53.480
<v Speaker 1>premium spikes, which is exactly what we've seen in v

0:14:53.720 --> 0:14:56.480
<v Speaker 1>x X. It's exactly what Credit Suite did to t

0:14:56.680 --> 0:15:00.520
<v Speaker 1>VX uh basically a decade ago. Uh. And in that case,

0:15:00.560 --> 0:15:02.200
<v Speaker 1>they just led a trade to a premium until they

0:15:02.240 --> 0:15:04.080
<v Speaker 1>got comfortable again, and then they issued a whole bunch

0:15:04.080 --> 0:15:07.160
<v Speaker 1>of shares out of inventory and in my opinion, somewhat

0:15:07.160 --> 0:15:10.760
<v Speaker 1>feloniously probably booked the profit on that because they were

0:15:10.760 --> 0:15:14.280
<v Speaker 1>actually issuing out of the market at a high price. UM.

0:15:14.760 --> 0:15:18.560
<v Speaker 1>Let me jump in here, because uh, these banks, Uh,

0:15:18.960 --> 0:15:21.240
<v Speaker 1>you're right, they do it almost when they want, and

0:15:21.280 --> 0:15:24.200
<v Speaker 1>that's what's annoying. In this case. Barclays did give some

0:15:24.480 --> 0:15:27.720
<v Speaker 1>logic they said, well, we've run out of issuance capacity,

0:15:27.760 --> 0:15:29.760
<v Speaker 1>but if you look at the documents, they are not

0:15:30.200 --> 0:15:33.520
<v Speaker 1>out of issuance capacity. They have plenty of runway left.

0:15:33.960 --> 0:15:37.240
<v Speaker 1>And so some speculated it's about hedging costs some who

0:15:37.280 --> 0:15:40.760
<v Speaker 1>speculated that somebody made a clerical error with the structure

0:15:40.800 --> 0:15:43.560
<v Speaker 1>products and this is sort of part of that fallout.

0:15:43.920 --> 0:15:46.320
<v Speaker 1>There's also a theory that it could be the canary

0:15:46.360 --> 0:15:51.040
<v Speaker 1>and a deeper problem with their books. Uh, and somebody

0:15:51.080 --> 0:15:55.240
<v Speaker 1>that management is just like, stop everything, what's your take on,

0:15:55.320 --> 0:15:58.040
<v Speaker 1>what's really going on behind the scenes? Who pulled the

0:15:58.120 --> 0:16:01.320
<v Speaker 1>plug and why? Well, so there are rumors on I

0:16:01.400 --> 0:16:03.040
<v Speaker 1>mean I heard those rumors too, that there was sort

0:16:03.040 --> 0:16:05.080
<v Speaker 1>of a blow up in some structure product issuance that

0:16:05.080 --> 0:16:07.720
<v Speaker 1>had to get delayed. Um, and that puts some strain

0:16:07.880 --> 0:16:09.720
<v Speaker 1>on the risk desk. And remember in the in the

0:16:09.800 --> 0:16:12.480
<v Speaker 1>sort of a post Dodd Frank world, banks have to

0:16:12.480 --> 0:16:16.200
<v Speaker 1>actually manage their overall risk pretty carefully. And so every

0:16:16.200 --> 0:16:18.680
<v Speaker 1>bank has somebody whose job it is to pay attention

0:16:18.760 --> 0:16:21.440
<v Speaker 1>to how much VEGA exposure do we have, right, how

0:16:21.480 --> 0:16:24.120
<v Speaker 1>much long equity exposure do we have, how much international

0:16:24.120 --> 0:16:27.000
<v Speaker 1>currency exposure do we have? And in most cases they're

0:16:27.040 --> 0:16:29.360
<v Speaker 1>monitoring that literally in real time to make sure that

0:16:29.400 --> 0:16:32.440
<v Speaker 1>the bank doesn't get over at skis SKIS because they're

0:16:32.440 --> 0:16:36.320
<v Speaker 1>considered you know, important institutions by regulators around the world. Um,

0:16:36.400 --> 0:16:40.040
<v Speaker 1>so it is not unlikely that somebody looked at their

0:16:40.080 --> 0:16:42.760
<v Speaker 1>book and said, we have way too much long ball

0:16:42.800 --> 0:16:47.160
<v Speaker 1>exposure on our book for the given volatility environment. Even

0:16:47.240 --> 0:16:49.560
<v Speaker 1>though all of the E t N value of that

0:16:49.640 --> 0:16:52.480
<v Speaker 1>was offset by an exactly equal liability in the E

0:16:52.560 --> 0:16:54.760
<v Speaker 1>t N, that doesn't matter. That doesn't get to be

0:16:54.840 --> 0:16:57.760
<v Speaker 1>counted because that's just considered short term paper on the book.

0:16:58.040 --> 0:17:00.240
<v Speaker 1>So there's a lot there's an asset liability miss match

0:17:00.240 --> 0:17:02.880
<v Speaker 1>in terms of how banks have to account for these things.

0:17:02.920 --> 0:17:05.359
<v Speaker 1>So it's not inconceivable they just got over their skis

0:17:05.400 --> 0:17:08.639
<v Speaker 1>on risk. The sort of canard they put up of

0:17:08.720 --> 0:17:12.040
<v Speaker 1>well we ran out of share issuance, that does happen

0:17:12.160 --> 0:17:14.040
<v Speaker 1>like I mean, we know for a fact, for instance,

0:17:14.080 --> 0:17:16.960
<v Speaker 1>that US Commodities Funds ran into this on U s

0:17:17.040 --> 0:17:18.720
<v Speaker 1>O and I think on U n G a few

0:17:18.760 --> 0:17:21.760
<v Speaker 1>times where they literally just didn't file to issue new

0:17:21.920 --> 0:17:25.439
<v Speaker 1>new shares. Unlike an e t F, a commodity spooler

0:17:25.480 --> 0:17:28.240
<v Speaker 1>in E t N can only sell the shares it's

0:17:28.280 --> 0:17:31.600
<v Speaker 1>it's actually registered with the exchange, and when they run

0:17:31.640 --> 0:17:33.600
<v Speaker 1>out of those, they have to file for more and

0:17:33.640 --> 0:17:35.840
<v Speaker 1>pay a decent amount of money. So every time they

0:17:35.840 --> 0:17:37.879
<v Speaker 1>file for one of these extensions. It's like a hundred

0:17:37.880 --> 0:17:40.200
<v Speaker 1>and fifty grand to put a bunch of new shares

0:17:40.280 --> 0:17:43.280
<v Speaker 1>up on the books. Now, it's possible for them to

0:17:43.440 --> 0:17:47.399
<v Speaker 1>reuse shares that have been redeemed, but most banks don't,

0:17:47.440 --> 0:17:49.880
<v Speaker 1>and I don't believe either Credits Weeks or Barkleys does.

0:17:49.960 --> 0:17:52.240
<v Speaker 1>So when we look at and say, oh, well, there's

0:17:52.240 --> 0:17:54.800
<v Speaker 1>thirty three e t N three million e tns outstanding

0:17:54.800 --> 0:17:57.359
<v Speaker 1>and they've got coverage for fifty the problem is if

0:17:57.359 --> 0:17:59.320
<v Speaker 1>there has been a hundred million dollars in creations and

0:17:59.359 --> 0:18:02.000
<v Speaker 1>a hundred million dollars and redemptions, they don't get to

0:18:02.080 --> 0:18:04.720
<v Speaker 1>count that again, so they actually sort of use up

0:18:04.760 --> 0:18:07.080
<v Speaker 1>only one side of the balance sheet when they're issuing.

0:18:07.400 --> 0:18:10.119
<v Speaker 1>We don't actually know. You can't really impute it because

0:18:10.160 --> 0:18:12.720
<v Speaker 1>the creation redemption numbers are net so we don't get

0:18:12.760 --> 0:18:15.200
<v Speaker 1>to really see the creation redemption. We get to see

0:18:15.240 --> 0:18:18.679
<v Speaker 1>the net um. But I suspect either they let that

0:18:18.720 --> 0:18:20.879
<v Speaker 1>happen on purpose to get out of this business, or

0:18:20.880 --> 0:18:23.600
<v Speaker 1>the risk desk turned them down. Something that caught my

0:18:23.640 --> 0:18:26.359
<v Speaker 1>eye with this v x X situation is just the

0:18:26.440 --> 0:18:29.040
<v Speaker 1>ripple effects that it could have for the volatility market,

0:18:29.440 --> 0:18:31.480
<v Speaker 1>largely because I don't know. You might look at the

0:18:31.520 --> 0:18:33.280
<v Speaker 1>size of v x x and say, okay, it's like

0:18:33.359 --> 0:18:37.280
<v Speaker 1>nine million dollars. That's big, but it's not systemically big.

0:18:37.320 --> 0:18:40.080
<v Speaker 1>But Goldman actually put out a note yesterday noting that

0:18:40.400 --> 0:18:42.840
<v Speaker 1>if you look at the options market that surrounds v

0:18:43.119 --> 0:18:46.960
<v Speaker 1>x x, uh the share a count of options is

0:18:47.240 --> 0:18:51.080
<v Speaker 1>about or rather, the outstanding options on v xx are

0:18:51.160 --> 0:18:54.360
<v Speaker 1>roughly six times v x x is actual share account.

0:18:54.440 --> 0:18:57.080
<v Speaker 1>That is more than double the ratio of all but

0:18:57.280 --> 0:19:00.240
<v Speaker 1>two e t f s, which is pretty amazing. Mean,

0:19:00.560 --> 0:19:03.800
<v Speaker 1>it just speaks to that a lot of these volatility

0:19:03.800 --> 0:19:05.520
<v Speaker 1>e t F c t N s, they're used as

0:19:06.080 --> 0:19:09.200
<v Speaker 1>trading tools for a lot of these volatility players. And

0:19:09.480 --> 0:19:12.200
<v Speaker 1>I mean what this means for the liquidity. I mean,

0:19:12.200 --> 0:19:15.400
<v Speaker 1>how could that options market around vxx be liquid if

0:19:15.440 --> 0:19:20.000
<v Speaker 1>this e t N isn't really trading or wears are halted,

0:19:20.359 --> 0:19:25.479
<v Speaker 1>it's still trading, right right, So so the share creation

0:19:25.560 --> 0:19:27.560
<v Speaker 1>just means that it's going to disconnect from its fair

0:19:27.640 --> 0:19:29.920
<v Speaker 1>value and it's mostly going to trade at a premium.

0:19:30.240 --> 0:19:33.280
<v Speaker 1>But to your point, you're right, like, the options complex

0:19:33.320 --> 0:19:36.120
<v Speaker 1>around v xx is huge, and a lot of big

0:19:36.160 --> 0:19:40.120
<v Speaker 1>hedge funds use that on a very dynamic basis what

0:19:40.160 --> 0:19:42.640
<v Speaker 1>you're what, what you're seeing, if you're to monitor fin

0:19:42.760 --> 0:19:46.480
<v Speaker 1>twit vol folks, the trader community there you're talking, you're

0:19:46.480 --> 0:19:48.480
<v Speaker 1>seeing a lot of talking about moving to other vehicles,

0:19:48.520 --> 0:19:51.280
<v Speaker 1>moving to other ways of expressing those opinions about VEGA.

0:19:51.840 --> 0:19:54.720
<v Speaker 1>But that that options expiration cycle, both in the VXX

0:19:54.720 --> 0:19:57.280
<v Speaker 1>and really in the spy options and and the and

0:19:57.400 --> 0:20:00.639
<v Speaker 1>the in the futures, like that really impacts volatility in

0:20:00.680 --> 0:20:02.760
<v Speaker 1>pricing right the voulu you know, the whole sort of

0:20:02.840 --> 0:20:06.720
<v Speaker 1>vallpenning around opex is a very real phenomenon. It's less

0:20:06.720 --> 0:20:08.480
<v Speaker 1>of an issue in the VIXED complex than it is

0:20:08.520 --> 0:20:11.920
<v Speaker 1>directly in the underlying indexes. But you're right, like this

0:20:11.960 --> 0:20:14.119
<v Speaker 1>is it's a lot of shifting around of where that

0:20:14.160 --> 0:20:17.000
<v Speaker 1>exposure is going to come from. In that shifting around

0:20:17.080 --> 0:20:22.160
<v Speaker 1>create the opportunities for hiccups. Um. One of the aspects

0:20:22.200 --> 0:20:24.159
<v Speaker 1>of this is people who short the x X. So

0:20:24.840 --> 0:20:27.639
<v Speaker 1>last we look, there was about fifty of the shares

0:20:27.720 --> 0:20:32.120
<v Speaker 1>were held short the all creations, and man, you've gotta

0:20:32.119 --> 0:20:35.520
<v Speaker 1>be they screwed them over because let's say your short

0:20:35.520 --> 0:20:37.679
<v Speaker 1>this all of a sudden, it starts creeping up because

0:20:38.359 --> 0:20:40.879
<v Speaker 1>other people who are short start covering, well they have

0:20:41.000 --> 0:20:43.760
<v Speaker 1>they can't do creations. They gotta buy vxx open market.

0:20:44.359 --> 0:20:47.119
<v Speaker 1>That really starts to lift the price quickly, and then

0:20:47.160 --> 0:20:49.040
<v Speaker 1>you panic you can start to cover. So all of

0:20:49.080 --> 0:20:52.199
<v Speaker 1>a sudden, you're basically it's it's a you're in a

0:20:52.320 --> 0:20:54.880
<v Speaker 1>race to just basically make sure you don't lose too much.

0:20:55.280 --> 0:20:58.359
<v Speaker 1>Could they like sue the company because that's that's really

0:20:58.359 --> 0:21:01.280
<v Speaker 1>the product not working as designed. Uh, not that anybody

0:21:01.280 --> 0:21:03.800
<v Speaker 1>has these sympathy for short sellers, but they really they

0:21:03.880 --> 0:21:05.600
<v Speaker 1>made a fair bet and they got they're getting screwed

0:21:05.600 --> 0:21:10.800
<v Speaker 1>over interest. It was at six according to market numbers.

0:21:10.800 --> 0:21:16.320
<v Speaker 1>That's you basically just described the two fift t VIX

0:21:16.400 --> 0:21:19.200
<v Speaker 1>lawsuit right, which when you know what they got sued

0:21:19.200 --> 0:21:21.840
<v Speaker 1>for there, which was you know, we didn't you know,

0:21:21.920 --> 0:21:25.679
<v Speaker 1>manage the product correctly and therefore reliable to cred suits

0:21:25.760 --> 0:21:28.560
<v Speaker 1>won that lawsuit. So so, whether they morally should have

0:21:28.720 --> 0:21:31.640
<v Speaker 1>or not, they won the lawsuit because they had appropriately

0:21:31.680 --> 0:21:34.840
<v Speaker 1>disclosed everything they needed to disclose. I guarantee you that

0:21:34.880 --> 0:21:37.320
<v Speaker 1>Barclays is pretty much in the same boat. Everybody learned

0:21:37.400 --> 0:21:39.240
<v Speaker 1>that lesson that this is a get out of jail

0:21:39.280 --> 0:21:41.960
<v Speaker 1>free card. Um which is again why you guys put

0:21:41.960 --> 0:21:44.359
<v Speaker 1>a red light on this thing, right, because this is

0:21:44.440 --> 0:21:46.639
<v Speaker 1>always an option to your point about like all those

0:21:46.640 --> 0:21:48.560
<v Speaker 1>people who were short, and whether they're screwed or not.

0:21:49.240 --> 0:21:51.280
<v Speaker 1>You know, I guess the one thing against that would

0:21:51.320 --> 0:21:53.640
<v Speaker 1>be that there are other products out there, right, so

0:21:53.720 --> 0:21:57.080
<v Speaker 1>you know their BIXI exists, right, There is comparable beta

0:21:57.160 --> 0:22:00.280
<v Speaker 1>exposure available. It's not that difficult to roll up sort

0:22:00.320 --> 0:22:02.800
<v Speaker 1>of at the hedge fund level, and exposure that looks

0:22:02.920 --> 0:22:06.160
<v Speaker 1>just like vxx. So if you're short, you know at

0:22:06.960 --> 0:22:10.119
<v Speaker 1>premium you can actually cover your beta on that completely

0:22:10.160 --> 0:22:12.840
<v Speaker 1>just by buying vixie or by putting together your own

0:22:13.160 --> 0:22:16.040
<v Speaker 1>rolling portfolio of those things. So I don't think that

0:22:16.080 --> 0:22:19.400
<v Speaker 1>there's a systemic issue with that short position being there,

0:22:19.400 --> 0:22:21.240
<v Speaker 1>but there's no question if you're sitting there on the

0:22:21.280 --> 0:22:24.040
<v Speaker 1>short side, you have a really tough decision to make.

0:22:24.040 --> 0:22:26.600
<v Speaker 1>Do you cover up and make it worse or do

0:22:26.640 --> 0:22:29.879
<v Speaker 1>you just hang on for dear life, noting that eventually

0:22:29.920 --> 0:22:33.520
<v Speaker 1>this thing will crash back down to earth. What would

0:22:33.560 --> 0:22:36.000
<v Speaker 1>you do? I get the heck out of it, like,

0:22:36.040 --> 0:22:38.119
<v Speaker 1>I mean, it's I mean, I got a lot of

0:22:38.200 --> 0:22:39.879
<v Speaker 1>questions from people like, oh, how do I play this

0:22:39.880 --> 0:22:42.040
<v Speaker 1>premium blah blah blah blah blah, and it's like there

0:22:42.080 --> 0:22:46.120
<v Speaker 1>are billions of dollars in very sophisticated hedge funds waiting

0:22:46.240 --> 0:22:48.800
<v Speaker 1>for you to try, just desperate for you to try

0:22:48.800 --> 0:22:52.400
<v Speaker 1>to play this, Mr individual investor. By the way, sometimes

0:22:52.440 --> 0:22:55.000
<v Speaker 1>I tweet about this and most people have the sort

0:22:55.000 --> 0:22:58.320
<v Speaker 1>of understandable reaction, like call what it means, but really

0:22:58.520 --> 0:23:01.600
<v Speaker 1>I don't know. Tenth reply is like, oh, I'm loving this.

0:23:02.000 --> 0:23:03.800
<v Speaker 1>I don't know what they're doing, but they just some

0:23:03.880 --> 0:23:12.160
<v Speaker 1>people just love when Like are they financial journalists because this, Yeah,

0:23:12.240 --> 0:23:15.560
<v Speaker 1>that's true. These would be like people with like thirty

0:23:15.560 --> 0:23:17.719
<v Speaker 1>five followers. I think they're like, they're definitely a day

0:23:17.760 --> 0:23:21.320
<v Speaker 1>trade there. There there is a there. I absolutely have

0:23:21.359 --> 0:23:24.159
<v Speaker 1>seen the tweets from folks that we're using VXX in

0:23:24.400 --> 0:23:28.600
<v Speaker 1>sophisticated vall hedge fund strategies precisely because they knew this

0:23:28.640 --> 0:23:31.760
<v Speaker 1>could happen. Right, This was actually a feature, not a bug,

0:23:32.080 --> 0:23:34.639
<v Speaker 1>because it only goes one way. Right, there's nothing you

0:23:34.640 --> 0:23:37.879
<v Speaker 1>can do to be XX to make it traded at discount.

0:23:38.240 --> 0:23:40.280
<v Speaker 1>Like that's not that's not how the real world works,

0:23:40.280 --> 0:23:42.919
<v Speaker 1>and that would be unprecedented in the e t F world.

0:23:43.240 --> 0:23:46.040
<v Speaker 1>But you know, taking something that's an e t N

0:23:46.160 --> 0:23:49.320
<v Speaker 1>having a pop to a crazy premium, that's free money

0:23:49.400 --> 0:23:51.360
<v Speaker 1>for the folks that were smart enough to realize this

0:23:51.400 --> 0:23:54.199
<v Speaker 1>is just a hanging chad over e t N s

0:23:54.359 --> 0:24:03.159
<v Speaker 1>every day. If you were the SEC or you know

0:24:03.200 --> 0:24:06.000
<v Speaker 1>somebody that control over this, where all the banks you

0:24:06.040 --> 0:24:09.520
<v Speaker 1>could tell them, would you advise or regulate them to

0:24:09.560 --> 0:24:11.280
<v Speaker 1>get out of the E t M business once and

0:24:11.320 --> 0:24:13.960
<v Speaker 1>for all? Or is it okay to have this sort

0:24:13.960 --> 0:24:17.520
<v Speaker 1>of graded our district where this can happen over and over.

0:24:17.560 --> 0:24:20.239
<v Speaker 1>You just live with it because, um, you know, if

0:24:20.280 --> 0:24:22.119
<v Speaker 1>there's a market, hey, let people trade it. What do

0:24:22.119 --> 0:24:25.439
<v Speaker 1>you think it's time to just get them out? Uh?

0:24:25.560 --> 0:24:29.000
<v Speaker 1>What I'd rather see is for them to allow forty

0:24:29.080 --> 0:24:32.040
<v Speaker 1>act structures to effectively create the same types of things

0:24:32.080 --> 0:24:33.920
<v Speaker 1>like a lot of the pro shayers leverage and inverse funds,

0:24:33.960 --> 0:24:36.800
<v Speaker 1>for instance, are just straight up forty act funds because

0:24:36.800 --> 0:24:38.440
<v Speaker 1>they got in under the wire and they let them

0:24:38.440 --> 0:24:41.040
<v Speaker 1>manage them that way. There's no reason you have to

0:24:41.080 --> 0:24:43.840
<v Speaker 1>put this exposure into an e t N. This exposure

0:24:43.840 --> 0:24:47.480
<v Speaker 1>could very easily be in a straight up CFTC regulated

0:24:47.480 --> 0:24:50.760
<v Speaker 1>commodities pool. Um So in this case, I don't see

0:24:50.760 --> 0:24:53.360
<v Speaker 1>any reason for the e t N to exist. Uh.

0:24:53.400 --> 0:24:56.600
<v Speaker 1>And the SEC has been I mean they've paid attention.

0:24:56.720 --> 0:24:58.760
<v Speaker 1>Like I mean, over every couple of years, the SEC

0:24:59.080 --> 0:25:01.000
<v Speaker 1>turns the eye of we're on towards the E t

0:25:01.119 --> 0:25:03.959
<v Speaker 1>N market and waves their finger a little bit, you know,

0:25:04.040 --> 0:25:06.640
<v Speaker 1>And to be fair, we are now down to a handful.

0:25:06.720 --> 0:25:08.360
<v Speaker 1>I mean, you and I remember Eric, you know, ten

0:25:08.440 --> 0:25:11.439
<v Speaker 1>years ago there were dozens and dozens and dozens of

0:25:11.480 --> 0:25:13.959
<v Speaker 1>all those E tracks E t N s that didn't trade,

0:25:14.040 --> 0:25:15.960
<v Speaker 1>and like I mean, it was just it was a

0:25:16.040 --> 0:25:19.320
<v Speaker 1>real littered field of garbage that you know, all had

0:25:19.320 --> 0:25:21.920
<v Speaker 1>two million dollars in it never closed. Most of that's

0:25:21.960 --> 0:25:25.760
<v Speaker 1>finally thankfully gone away. Um. But yeah, at this point,

0:25:25.840 --> 0:25:28.080
<v Speaker 1>I would just think that it's better to shut these

0:25:28.080 --> 0:25:30.720
<v Speaker 1>things down. I'm not sure anybody's really getting great exposure

0:25:30.760 --> 0:25:32.159
<v Speaker 1>out of them anymore. And if you want this kind

0:25:32.160 --> 0:25:35.200
<v Speaker 1>of exposure is a wealthy investor. This is what structure

0:25:35.200 --> 0:25:38.440
<v Speaker 1>products are for. Literally, these kinds of patterns of returns.

0:25:38.480 --> 0:25:42.600
<v Speaker 1>Just one more wonky question. And the reason for using

0:25:42.760 --> 0:25:44.880
<v Speaker 1>E t N over E t F told the same

0:25:44.920 --> 0:25:48.439
<v Speaker 1>thing like fix or oil, is that the E t

0:25:48.720 --> 0:25:51.480
<v Speaker 1>N is taxed in a way that's a little more

0:25:51.600 --> 0:25:53.840
<v Speaker 1>like a stock, whereas the E T S holds futures

0:25:53.840 --> 0:25:56.800
<v Speaker 1>and taxation isn't as ideal, So is it is? The

0:25:56.800 --> 0:26:00.840
<v Speaker 1>E t N popularity really just largely about this tax loophole,

0:26:00.920 --> 0:26:06.240
<v Speaker 1>or I should say tax uh standardization with other ets.

0:26:06.800 --> 0:26:08.720
<v Speaker 1>I think it's two things. So, yes, the fact that

0:26:08.720 --> 0:26:11.480
<v Speaker 1>they're treated as prepaid forward contracts ie they get text

0:26:11.520 --> 0:26:13.960
<v Speaker 1>just like stock. That was a big selling point back

0:26:14.000 --> 0:26:16.520
<v Speaker 1>in the day, particularly around commodities E T N S

0:26:16.600 --> 0:26:18.520
<v Speaker 1>before we actually had a lot of the commodities pool

0:26:18.560 --> 0:26:21.280
<v Speaker 1>ones out there. Um. I think that's largely obviated now

0:26:21.320 --> 0:26:23.760
<v Speaker 1>because we've got great no K one commodity ETF and

0:26:23.800 --> 0:26:27.040
<v Speaker 1>all that kind of stuff. Um. The the other one

0:26:27.119 --> 0:26:29.440
<v Speaker 1>is frankly perfect tracking. Right. So the great thing about

0:26:29.480 --> 0:26:33.399
<v Speaker 1>VXX if you're a vaultrator running a very tight quantitative strategy,

0:26:33.560 --> 0:26:35.760
<v Speaker 1>is that you know what the indicative value is to

0:26:35.880 --> 0:26:39.840
<v Speaker 1>the penny and it never varies. Right, It's mathematically guaranteed.

0:26:40.480 --> 0:26:43.199
<v Speaker 1>When there was a viable creation redemption mechanism and it

0:26:43.240 --> 0:26:46.840
<v Speaker 1>was trading spot on, I have all the time. That's valuable.

0:26:46.880 --> 0:26:49.080
<v Speaker 1>And this is a complex strategy with a daily roll.

0:26:49.160 --> 0:26:51.400
<v Speaker 1>So there's a lot of opportunity for friction and miss

0:26:51.560 --> 0:26:54.800
<v Speaker 1>on this. So having it in a perfect tracking vehicle

0:26:54.840 --> 0:26:57.640
<v Speaker 1>like an et N makes a lot of sense. Dave.

0:26:58.320 --> 0:26:59.680
<v Speaker 1>One of the things that I just wanted to ask

0:26:59.680 --> 0:27:02.639
<v Speaker 1>you here was interesting what you said about E t

0:27:02.800 --> 0:27:06.960
<v Speaker 1>N S anything else that this episode has revealed that

0:27:07.200 --> 0:27:10.960
<v Speaker 1>the market needs to be talking about more openly and

0:27:11.440 --> 0:27:14.720
<v Speaker 1>consider changes or is this kind of business as usual

0:27:14.880 --> 0:27:18.400
<v Speaker 1>in worst case scenarios. It feels pretty business as usial

0:27:18.440 --> 0:27:20.640
<v Speaker 1>in worst case scenarios. I mean, we'd really do need

0:27:20.680 --> 0:27:23.480
<v Speaker 1>to make clear that this was a conversation in two chapters.

0:27:23.520 --> 0:27:25.879
<v Speaker 1>What's going on in v x x UH and the

0:27:25.920 --> 0:27:28.119
<v Speaker 1>other barklays et N that's shut, which is O I

0:27:28.320 --> 0:27:32.280
<v Speaker 1>l um. That is an extraordinarily unique thing to e

0:27:32.440 --> 0:27:34.639
<v Speaker 1>t N s issued by the two big banks that

0:27:34.680 --> 0:27:37.280
<v Speaker 1>really still issue e t N s um and it

0:27:37.400 --> 0:27:41.639
<v Speaker 1>is the most problematic edge of the EXTREMEE traded product landscape.

0:27:41.920 --> 0:27:44.240
<v Speaker 1>That has nothing to do with what's going on in Russia,

0:27:44.320 --> 0:27:47.359
<v Speaker 1>even though we are talking about suspended you know, creations

0:27:47.400 --> 0:27:49.840
<v Speaker 1>in both cases, what's going on in Russia strikes me

0:27:49.840 --> 0:27:51.840
<v Speaker 1>as a little bit more like a two year flood.

0:27:52.119 --> 0:27:54.760
<v Speaker 1>I I would not have expected to see this in

0:27:54.800 --> 0:27:57.280
<v Speaker 1>my lifetime, and I don't particularly expect to see it

0:27:57.320 --> 0:28:01.720
<v Speaker 1>again in my lifetime because it requires, you know, literally

0:28:01.840 --> 0:28:05.199
<v Speaker 1>the overnight turning of a major economic player into a

0:28:05.240 --> 0:28:07.200
<v Speaker 1>pariahs state. I don't think we're going to see that

0:28:07.240 --> 0:28:10.280
<v Speaker 1>again in the next twenty years. I hope. Right. Well,

0:28:10.680 --> 0:28:12.800
<v Speaker 1>you've bring up the emergency markets, so we didn't really

0:28:12.800 --> 0:28:14.080
<v Speaker 1>get to that. But like you know, this is why

0:28:14.080 --> 0:28:16.480
<v Speaker 1>the cold emerging I mean, they are dangerous. The governments,

0:28:16.520 --> 0:28:19.080
<v Speaker 1>some of them authoritarian. I will say this is probably

0:28:19.280 --> 0:28:21.119
<v Speaker 1>you know, we've had first toll on her F R,

0:28:21.200 --> 0:28:23.840
<v Speaker 1>D M, E TF talk about in et F. It

0:28:24.000 --> 0:28:27.639
<v Speaker 1>keeps getting justified and justified. No China, no Turkey. It

0:28:27.680 --> 0:28:30.400
<v Speaker 1>really is true. All the problems are from governments with authority,

0:28:30.440 --> 0:28:35.120
<v Speaker 1>authoritarian sort of you know, not dictators, but just governments

0:28:35.119 --> 0:28:38.520
<v Speaker 1>can just do whatever they want. Um, it's an interesting

0:28:39.040 --> 0:28:41.640
<v Speaker 1>time for that fund. I think it would probably grow

0:28:41.760 --> 0:28:45.440
<v Speaker 1>after this. But I do think the emerging markets, especially

0:28:45.480 --> 0:28:47.520
<v Speaker 1>with China, it's gonna get it now. China is going

0:28:47.600 --> 0:28:50.400
<v Speaker 1>to be even bigger in e M, and I don't know,

0:28:50.480 --> 0:28:52.760
<v Speaker 1>I can feel like the whole emerging markets complex or

0:28:52.800 --> 0:28:55.560
<v Speaker 1>it gets unbundled or shifted around. I don't know this.

0:28:55.960 --> 0:28:58.080
<v Speaker 1>Do you think this is a game changing moment. I

0:28:58.400 --> 0:29:02.080
<v Speaker 1>think I've already said they're they're killing the acronym brick

0:29:04.440 --> 0:29:07.040
<v Speaker 1>at some point. Yeah. I I'm not a big fan

0:29:07.080 --> 0:29:10.080
<v Speaker 1>of the idea of bricks or bicks anyway, but but yeah,

0:29:10.160 --> 0:29:12.480
<v Speaker 1>I think this puts a spotlight on what we mean

0:29:12.520 --> 0:29:15.360
<v Speaker 1>by emerging markets. I think a lot of people, particularly

0:29:15.400 --> 0:29:19.959
<v Speaker 1>financial advisors, have treated e m as as a monolithic bucket. Right.

0:29:20.040 --> 0:29:21.640
<v Speaker 1>It's just a pattern of returns you put in the

0:29:21.640 --> 0:29:23.520
<v Speaker 1>corner of your portfolio. You put eight percent in it,

0:29:23.520 --> 0:29:26.160
<v Speaker 1>and everybody's happy. Um. And what we're learning is, though

0:29:26.160 --> 0:29:29.920
<v Speaker 1>there's a huge difference between Russia, China, India, Brazil and

0:29:30.000 --> 0:29:34.000
<v Speaker 1>all of the other emerging markets, they're all individually very unique. UM.

0:29:34.080 --> 0:29:36.080
<v Speaker 1>I'm a big fan of Perth product f R d M.

0:29:36.320 --> 0:29:38.080
<v Speaker 1>I think it's a really great way to to to

0:29:38.240 --> 0:29:41.240
<v Speaker 1>spin this UM. But I think what we also saw

0:29:41.480 --> 0:29:44.720
<v Speaker 1>was when we all the major emerging markets ets had

0:29:44.760 --> 0:29:48.160
<v Speaker 1>to pull Russia out because the index providers called those

0:29:48.200 --> 0:29:51.719
<v Speaker 1>market Russia uninvestable. Again, there was a lot of I

0:29:51.760 --> 0:29:56.480
<v Speaker 1>think legitimate hand ringing there that the optionality of whether

0:29:56.560 --> 0:29:59.040
<v Speaker 1>or not those Russian stocks might someday be worth something

0:29:59.120 --> 0:30:01.880
<v Speaker 1>was being taking out of the hands of an existing

0:30:02.320 --> 0:30:06.160
<v Speaker 1>e e M or vw OH shareholder. That's a legit complaint,

0:30:06.360 --> 0:30:08.840
<v Speaker 1>but it's a complaint about indexing and that and I

0:30:08.880 --> 0:30:10.760
<v Speaker 1>think that's a really important thing if you're in an

0:30:10.800 --> 0:30:14.640
<v Speaker 1>actively managed emerging markets mutual fund right now, they must exist.

0:30:14.720 --> 0:30:16.200
<v Speaker 1>I can't think I went off the top of my head.

0:30:16.680 --> 0:30:19.080
<v Speaker 1>Whether or not you were in Russia is a choice

0:30:19.120 --> 0:30:22.240
<v Speaker 1>that your PM made, right so that like you voted

0:30:22.280 --> 0:30:24.680
<v Speaker 1>for that PM with your dollars. I don't think most

0:30:24.680 --> 0:30:27.080
<v Speaker 1>people who just threw money into EM or v w

0:30:27.200 --> 0:30:29.680
<v Speaker 1>OH spent a lot of energy thinking about whether they

0:30:29.680 --> 0:30:32.479
<v Speaker 1>were enough foot see or MSc I index and what

0:30:32.560 --> 0:30:35.040
<v Speaker 1>was going to happen on you know, whether this country

0:30:35.120 --> 0:30:36.680
<v Speaker 1>was going to get in or out. You know, we

0:30:36.720 --> 0:30:39.560
<v Speaker 1>talked about it when countries, you know, try to get

0:30:39.600 --> 0:30:42.000
<v Speaker 1>into the emerging markets, but like this is a big

0:30:42.040 --> 0:30:44.600
<v Speaker 1>getting out and that's been you know, a long time coming.

0:30:44.640 --> 0:30:48.800
<v Speaker 1>We haven't seen that before, all right, Dave. Usually I

0:30:48.800 --> 0:30:52.240
<v Speaker 1>asked for favorite tickers. We've done that before with you. Um,

0:30:52.280 --> 0:30:55.800
<v Speaker 1>I want to ask you what's your favorite E M ticker. Well,

0:30:55.840 --> 0:30:57.480
<v Speaker 1>I mean I already said it Freedom f r d

0:30:57.720 --> 0:31:02.240
<v Speaker 1>M Alpha architect Freedom one hundred. I get that right.

0:31:02.240 --> 0:31:03.640
<v Speaker 1>I don't even remember if I got the name of

0:31:03.640 --> 0:31:05.240
<v Speaker 1>the fund right, but it's that far d M and

0:31:05.280 --> 0:31:08.440
<v Speaker 1>it's the only, it's really the only interesting emerging markets

0:31:08.440 --> 0:31:12.280
<v Speaker 1>fund out there. It's the only one doing something really different. Dave, Katie,

0:31:12.320 --> 0:31:15.000
<v Speaker 1>thanks for joining us on Trillians. Thank you, thank you.

0:31:20.840 --> 0:31:23.360
<v Speaker 1>Thanks for listening to Trillions. Until next time. You can

0:31:23.360 --> 0:31:27.720
<v Speaker 1>find us on the Bloomberg Terminal, Bloomberg dot com, Apple Podcast, Spotify,

0:31:28.080 --> 0:31:30.520
<v Speaker 1>and wherever else woul you'd like to listen. We'd love

0:31:30.560 --> 0:31:32.960
<v Speaker 1>to hear from you. We're on Twitter, I'm at Joel

0:31:33.000 --> 0:31:36.480
<v Speaker 1>Webber Show. He's at aer Fultunice. This episode of Trilliance

0:31:36.520 --> 0:31:39.600
<v Speaker 1>was produced by Magnus Hendrickson. Francesca Levi is the head

0:31:39.640 --> 0:31:41.280
<v Speaker 1>of Bloomberg podcast Fight