WEBVTT - Diversification Play: Why It's Not Too Late to Buy Asia

0:00:02.720 --> 0:00:09.440
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg Audio Studios, podcasts, radio news, Marin Talks Money listeners.

0:00:09.760 --> 0:00:12.840
<v Speaker 1>Are you a Bloomberg subscriber? If you are not, here

0:00:12.920 --> 0:00:15.400
<v Speaker 1>is why you should be. You will get add free

0:00:15.480 --> 0:00:18.200
<v Speaker 1>episodes of this podcast and access to my Marin Talks

0:00:18.239 --> 0:00:21.520
<v Speaker 1>Money newsletter. You'll also get access to John's award winning

0:00:21.560 --> 0:00:25.079
<v Speaker 1>newsletter Money Distilled. And you'll get access to subscriber on

0:00:25.160 --> 0:00:26.599
<v Speaker 1>the events like the one we are going to be

0:00:26.640 --> 0:00:28.920
<v Speaker 1>hosting on March the seventeenth. See the link in the

0:00:28.920 --> 0:00:31.360
<v Speaker 1>show notes to sign up to that. Finally, of course,

0:00:31.400 --> 0:00:34.159
<v Speaker 1>you will get unlimited access to Bloomberg dot Com and

0:00:34.159 --> 0:00:37.360
<v Speaker 1>the Bloomberg App, including exclusive stories and premium market tools.

0:00:37.520 --> 0:00:52.960
<v Speaker 1>Subscribe now at Bloomberg dot com slash podcast offer. Welcome

0:00:52.960 --> 0:00:54.959
<v Speaker 1>to Marin Talks Money, the podcast in which people who

0:00:55.000 --> 0:00:58.440
<v Speaker 1>know the markets explain the markets. I am Maren Somerset Web.

0:00:58.600 --> 0:01:01.320
<v Speaker 1>This week I am speaking with Fion Yang, portfolio manager

0:01:01.320 --> 0:01:05.000
<v Speaker 1>on the Invesco Asia Dragon. Fiera specializes in Asian equities

0:01:05.040 --> 0:01:08.240
<v Speaker 1>and she is the perfect person to help us all

0:01:08.319 --> 0:01:12.080
<v Speaker 1>understand where Asia fits into our portfolios this year. Fiona,

0:01:12.120 --> 0:01:14.920
<v Speaker 1>Welcome to Marin Talks Money. Hello Marion, thank you for

0:01:14.959 --> 0:01:18.679
<v Speaker 1>having me on a show. Well, it's going to be good. Now. Listen,

0:01:18.800 --> 0:01:23.240
<v Speaker 1>your space is absolutely huge. You're covering pretty much all

0:01:23.280 --> 0:01:25.760
<v Speaker 1>of Asia bar Japan, right, all of that counts is

0:01:25.800 --> 0:01:30.039
<v Speaker 1>emerging Asia. So you're covering this vast area which international

0:01:30.080 --> 0:01:35.399
<v Speaker 1>investors were not paying nearly enough attention to until relatively recently.

0:01:35.480 --> 0:01:37.360
<v Speaker 1>So until even you know, a year ago, it was

0:01:37.400 --> 0:01:41.040
<v Speaker 1>all America, America, America, American exceptionalism. And now we've begun

0:01:41.160 --> 0:01:44.840
<v Speaker 1>to see this rotation out of the US and into

0:01:44.959 --> 0:01:47.640
<v Speaker 1>every other interesting market there is, which is quite a

0:01:47.680 --> 0:01:49.200
<v Speaker 1>lot of the ones that you cover, and your your

0:01:49.240 --> 0:01:53.120
<v Speaker 1>trust had excellent performance last year partially as a result.

0:01:53.920 --> 0:01:57.520
<v Speaker 1>Now these markets aren't looking quite as cheap as they were, right,

0:01:57.600 --> 0:01:59.800
<v Speaker 1>but maybe you could just talk us through the way

0:01:59.840 --> 0:02:02.640
<v Speaker 1>that rotation is working for your market. Yeah.

0:02:02.720 --> 0:02:05.960
<v Speaker 2>I think twenty twenty five was a year of rebalancing,

0:02:06.000 --> 0:02:09.560
<v Speaker 2>I would like to call it because of external factors

0:02:09.680 --> 0:02:13.480
<v Speaker 2>like the weak US dollar, as well as domestic adding

0:02:13.560 --> 0:02:16.680
<v Speaker 2>like the central banking Asia basically cutting into straight to

0:02:16.720 --> 0:02:20.400
<v Speaker 2>try to stumulate economic growth that just perpected a lot

0:02:20.440 --> 0:02:25.320
<v Speaker 2>of tension combined with Asia, just Taiwan and Career being

0:02:25.400 --> 0:02:29.919
<v Speaker 2>the engine behind the global ai revolution. I do think

0:02:30.160 --> 0:02:34.680
<v Speaker 2>Ernie's growth, combined with evaluation rating has really driven the

0:02:34.720 --> 0:02:38.519
<v Speaker 2>Asia market to outperform a lot of the other developed market.

0:02:39.080 --> 0:02:41.600
<v Speaker 2>And we're heading into twenty twenty six, a lot of

0:02:41.600 --> 0:02:45.720
<v Speaker 2>investors are thinking about rebalancing their global portfolio. Increasingly they

0:02:45.720 --> 0:02:49.560
<v Speaker 2>want to racify further into Asia. Animal Asia.

0:02:51.760 --> 0:02:54.079
<v Speaker 1>It's not just age obviously, it's musing markets around the world.

0:02:54.120 --> 0:02:56.320
<v Speaker 1>But for purposers of this podcast, where we're sticking with

0:02:56.360 --> 0:02:59.359
<v Speaker 1>the Asia. But again, we've already made this mistake almost

0:02:59.400 --> 0:03:02.799
<v Speaker 1>before we be and started by referring to Asia as

0:03:02.880 --> 0:03:06.200
<v Speaker 1>one big homogeneous mass, which of course it isn't. And

0:03:06.280 --> 0:03:08.360
<v Speaker 1>a lot of people when they think about the Asian

0:03:08.360 --> 0:03:10.880
<v Speaker 1>markets or the emerging Asian markets, they will think about

0:03:11.080 --> 0:03:14.000
<v Speaker 1>China and they'll forget about all the other markets. So

0:03:14.440 --> 0:03:16.400
<v Speaker 1>these are all very different, right, We have to look

0:03:16.440 --> 0:03:18.919
<v Speaker 1>at them as very separate countries in separate markets.

0:03:19.680 --> 0:03:23.040
<v Speaker 2>Yeah. Absolutely, I think one of the biggest misconceptions about

0:03:23.080 --> 0:03:26.280
<v Speaker 2>Asia is this is China and the rest. But reality,

0:03:26.280 --> 0:03:29.440
<v Speaker 2>as you pointed out, there are so many different countries

0:03:29.440 --> 0:03:32.640
<v Speaker 2>there for a different sectors within Asia. Look at India,

0:03:32.639 --> 0:03:36.120
<v Speaker 2>It's a country that can generate ten percent nominal GDP growth,

0:03:36.760 --> 0:03:40.080
<v Speaker 2>you can't really find very rare to finding the developed market.

0:03:40.400 --> 0:03:42.960
<v Speaker 2>And then you look at the East Asia block, there

0:03:42.960 --> 0:03:46.440
<v Speaker 2>are just so many countries that benefit from the diversification

0:03:46.640 --> 0:03:49.320
<v Speaker 2>of manufacturing hut away from China or more of a

0:03:49.440 --> 0:03:53.280
<v Speaker 2>China plus one strategy. And then the tech sector is

0:03:53.520 --> 0:03:58.680
<v Speaker 2>Asia is not just emerging technology, it's more like the

0:03:58.760 --> 0:04:02.120
<v Speaker 2>uncompested leaders a lot of the global act sector in

0:04:02.200 --> 0:04:06.320
<v Speaker 2>memory foundry and or all of this just make Asia

0:04:06.440 --> 0:04:08.760
<v Speaker 2>extremely exciting place to invest.

0:04:09.600 --> 0:04:11.800
<v Speaker 1>Okay, well, why don't we start I tell you what

0:04:11.840 --> 0:04:14.120
<v Speaker 1>before we move on to looking at what's referred to

0:04:14.160 --> 0:04:16.520
<v Speaker 1>as the emerging economies in China, although sort of slightly

0:04:16.560 --> 0:04:19.520
<v Speaker 1>ridiculously the very idea that South Korea could be considered

0:04:19.560 --> 0:04:22.720
<v Speaker 1>emerging at this point as ridiculous, of course, but Japan

0:04:22.920 --> 0:04:26.800
<v Speaker 1>is not included in that. So let's briefly, if you

0:04:26.800 --> 0:04:30.520
<v Speaker 1>don't mind, talk about is there any spillover effect from

0:04:30.839 --> 0:04:35.040
<v Speaker 1>the election in Japan? So we have this supermajority now

0:04:35.080 --> 0:04:37.800
<v Speaker 1>for Takeichi, and that means that she will be able

0:04:37.839 --> 0:04:40.760
<v Speaker 1>to drive forward all her priorities inside Japan. And I

0:04:40.839 --> 0:04:43.240
<v Speaker 1>know that one of the worries there if there are

0:04:43.279 --> 0:04:45.160
<v Speaker 1>that many worries around it, but there're worries to do

0:04:45.279 --> 0:04:48.320
<v Speaker 1>with with Japan's fiscal position, and there of course worries

0:04:48.360 --> 0:04:52.240
<v Speaker 1>to do with any ratcheting up of tension in the

0:04:52.279 --> 0:04:55.760
<v Speaker 1>whole region as a result of defense spending and talking

0:04:55.800 --> 0:04:58.400
<v Speaker 1>about China and in Japan. Is there anything in that

0:04:58.400 --> 0:05:01.280
<v Speaker 1>that might spill over to change the conversation that we're

0:05:01.279 --> 0:05:01.840
<v Speaker 1>about to have.

0:05:02.880 --> 0:05:05.600
<v Speaker 2>I think though in the China and Japan relationship is

0:05:05.640 --> 0:05:08.640
<v Speaker 2>always being a bit tricky. So I've actually in Japan

0:05:08.720 --> 0:05:11.320
<v Speaker 2>for holiday earlier this year. One of the main things

0:05:11.320 --> 0:05:15.320
<v Speaker 2>happening is Chinese tool groups are not flying into Japan

0:05:15.360 --> 0:05:18.839
<v Speaker 2>and more. That's definitely a big head to the Japanese

0:05:18.880 --> 0:05:22.039
<v Speaker 2>tourism industry. But then at the flip side, it's just

0:05:22.320 --> 0:05:25.359
<v Speaker 2>they might have found the Australians or the other nationals

0:05:25.760 --> 0:05:31.680
<v Speaker 2>want to go to Japan because of course exactly, I

0:05:31.720 --> 0:05:33.760
<v Speaker 2>think the vacancy at a skiing resort I go to

0:05:33.880 --> 0:05:37.680
<v Speaker 2>pretty much get filed immediately when they release those vacancies,

0:05:38.560 --> 0:05:40.960
<v Speaker 2>so there could be a bit of a transition period,

0:05:41.000 --> 0:05:44.279
<v Speaker 2>but I think the impact is manageable. And in terms

0:05:44.279 --> 0:05:46.760
<v Speaker 2>of you know, the competitive dynamics. What happened to the

0:05:46.920 --> 0:05:49.919
<v Speaker 2>NISI en Lusus security one is something that I probably

0:05:50.000 --> 0:05:53.560
<v Speaker 2>monitored more because for my portfolio, we do have significant

0:05:53.600 --> 0:05:56.920
<v Speaker 2>exposure to the Korean ex borders and the current sy

0:05:57.120 --> 0:06:00.360
<v Speaker 2>always play a part in terms of the pricing competitive nurse.

0:06:01.279 --> 0:06:02.960
<v Speaker 1>So the current portfolio, I guess this.

0:06:03.080 --> 0:06:06.640
<v Speaker 2>Concentrated a lot in the Korean memory space. I do

0:06:06.680 --> 0:06:09.120
<v Speaker 2>you think Japan at this point doesn't really have this

0:06:09.200 --> 0:06:13.320
<v Speaker 2>strong consentder as compared to the Korean memory producers. So

0:06:13.400 --> 0:06:16.960
<v Speaker 2>I feel relatively comfortable with that ex culture in Korea.

0:06:17.920 --> 0:06:20.640
<v Speaker 1>Okay, that's the first elephant in the room for this area,

0:06:20.680 --> 0:06:23.080
<v Speaker 1>and the second is demographics. So I just wanted to

0:06:23.120 --> 0:06:25.200
<v Speaker 1>get that talk about that a little before we move

0:06:25.240 --> 0:06:28.120
<v Speaker 1>on in that. Historically, say twenty years ago, even ten

0:06:28.200 --> 0:06:30.840
<v Speaker 1>years ago, when a room was looking at the investment

0:06:30.880 --> 0:06:33.760
<v Speaker 1>opportunities across Asia, one of the things would be said

0:06:33.760 --> 0:06:38.120
<v Speaker 1>would be growing populations, growing middle class populations, a rising prosperity,

0:06:38.160 --> 0:06:40.480
<v Speaker 1>et cetera. And then that began to be people going, oh,

0:06:40.480 --> 0:06:42.240
<v Speaker 1>I don't know, maybe China is going to get old

0:06:42.279 --> 0:06:45.640
<v Speaker 1>before it gets rich. And then we've had this much

0:06:45.720 --> 0:06:50.480
<v Speaker 1>faster than anyone ever expected fall off in fertility rates

0:06:50.480 --> 0:06:53.080
<v Speaker 1>and I'm sure we both saw those numbers in China

0:06:53.160 --> 0:06:56.040
<v Speaker 1>showing fewer than eight million berths in China last year,

0:06:56.040 --> 0:06:57.960
<v Speaker 1>which was a bit of a shock to the system,

0:06:58.000 --> 0:07:00.719
<v Speaker 1>even for people who'd been very worried about demographics. And

0:07:00.760 --> 0:07:04.000
<v Speaker 1>we have Taiwan, Korea, all these countries have written up

0:07:04.040 --> 0:07:07.800
<v Speaker 1>every low fertility rate and even places like you know, Vietnam,

0:07:07.800 --> 0:07:10.440
<v Speaker 1>et cetera, where we thought fertility would remain higher for longer,

0:07:10.600 --> 0:07:16.120
<v Speaker 1>falling below replacement rate. Does that sort of massive macro

0:07:17.240 --> 0:07:20.680
<v Speaker 1>first change anything about the way you see the region.

0:07:21.440 --> 0:07:24.200
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, the great question and a very long term question.

0:07:24.680 --> 0:07:28.160
<v Speaker 2>And I do of the sitting here in Singapore. No,

0:07:28.320 --> 0:07:30.480
<v Speaker 2>it's one of the places I have one of the

0:07:30.520 --> 0:07:34.080
<v Speaker 2>lowest bust rate in the region, and in China as well.

0:07:34.200 --> 0:07:37.120
<v Speaker 2>Looking at my peer groups, the incentives the government has

0:07:37.160 --> 0:07:39.280
<v Speaker 2>introduced for them to have two babies or even three

0:07:39.320 --> 0:07:43.760
<v Speaker 2>kid is just not enough to incentivise to have more.

0:07:44.080 --> 0:07:48.160
<v Speaker 2>So this structural trend is undeniable. I think that's why

0:07:48.320 --> 0:07:51.840
<v Speaker 2>a lot of the countries are trying to evolve their policies.

0:07:52.120 --> 0:07:55.920
<v Speaker 2>Instead of you know, labor focused manufacturing, they're trying to

0:07:55.960 --> 0:07:58.400
<v Speaker 2>move up the value added tay. They try to do

0:07:58.480 --> 0:08:01.880
<v Speaker 2>more electronics using more or of robotics as well as

0:08:01.960 --> 0:08:05.640
<v Speaker 2>the automation try to move away from the label sector

0:08:05.720 --> 0:08:12.000
<v Speaker 2>to two different drivers. Why the structural challenge remains and

0:08:12.120 --> 0:08:14.680
<v Speaker 2>we need to be selected in terms of the sector

0:08:14.800 --> 0:08:17.600
<v Speaker 2>we might want to have expoke to. And then there

0:08:17.720 --> 0:08:23.400
<v Speaker 2>is the added sort of silver investment theme that increasingly

0:08:23.520 --> 0:08:26.600
<v Speaker 2>you start to see companies that are just attragging to

0:08:26.720 --> 0:08:31.520
<v Speaker 2>the need of the retire read because instead of trying

0:08:31.520 --> 0:08:33.960
<v Speaker 2>to pay their to the kids, now everyone is trying

0:08:34.000 --> 0:08:38.920
<v Speaker 2>to say the hospitality industry as well as even retire

0:08:38.920 --> 0:08:42.080
<v Speaker 2>re education, re education industry, all of this are gaining

0:08:42.080 --> 0:08:45.080
<v Speaker 2>more affections in Asia. I think the good thing is,

0:08:45.120 --> 0:08:49.959
<v Speaker 2>again it's a diverse region with many countries, and there's

0:08:50.040 --> 0:08:53.240
<v Speaker 2>just every single country had the different stage of their

0:08:53.360 --> 0:08:56.679
<v Speaker 2>aiding population. Career could be the first one and China

0:08:56.840 --> 0:09:00.319
<v Speaker 2>follow food for Asia Fund manager myself, then there are

0:09:00.400 --> 0:09:04.319
<v Speaker 2>just different sort of tracks you can tech to and

0:09:04.920 --> 0:09:07.600
<v Speaker 2>imply what could happen to some of the other countries

0:09:08.040 --> 0:09:11.439
<v Speaker 2>when they enter the aiding demographic a bit later on.

0:09:12.120 --> 0:09:14.679
<v Speaker 1>Anyway, that's probably a bigger and different conversation. Maybe we'll

0:09:14.679 --> 0:09:17.240
<v Speaker 1>pick that one up another time, but let's go on

0:09:17.320 --> 0:09:21.200
<v Speaker 1>to why don't we talk about how you invest. When

0:09:21.200 --> 0:09:24.480
<v Speaker 1>I look at what you do and what your trust does,

0:09:24.480 --> 0:09:26.959
<v Speaker 1>it's very kid. This is a valuation driven and valuation

0:09:27.120 --> 0:09:30.600
<v Speaker 1>focused method of investing across this insanely big region. So

0:09:30.640 --> 0:09:33.199
<v Speaker 1>tell us a little bit about how you do that.

0:09:33.960 --> 0:09:36.800
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, very happy to chat about that or something that

0:09:36.840 --> 0:09:39.680
<v Speaker 2>I do every single day. So I would say we

0:09:39.800 --> 0:09:44.040
<v Speaker 2>probably differentiate by three key points. The first one is,

0:09:44.200 --> 0:09:48.640
<v Speaker 2>as you correctly point out, is valuation discipline. It's just

0:09:48.840 --> 0:09:54.119
<v Speaker 2>we try to find unvalued miss priced opportunities. Everything basically

0:09:54.280 --> 0:09:57.080
<v Speaker 2>has a fair value and we try to buy it

0:09:57.240 --> 0:10:00.240
<v Speaker 2>at a point. As you know, market is few full,

0:10:00.320 --> 0:10:04.040
<v Speaker 2>which are the buyer when the stock price is significantly

0:10:04.440 --> 0:10:07.280
<v Speaker 2>below the fair value assessment that we have is estefinished

0:10:07.320 --> 0:10:11.240
<v Speaker 2>for the company itself. And the second point is we try.

0:10:11.120 --> 0:10:13.920
<v Speaker 1>To be long term. I think a lot of times.

0:10:14.640 --> 0:10:20.480
<v Speaker 2>Too much actively itself is non desirable. The market extremely volatile.

0:10:21.360 --> 0:10:26.520
<v Speaker 2>I think a frequent activity will not really help a

0:10:26.559 --> 0:10:29.000
<v Speaker 2>lot of investors.

0:10:29.000 --> 0:10:29.719
<v Speaker 1>So what we do.

0:10:29.800 --> 0:10:33.640
<v Speaker 2>The typical holding period is around three to five years.

0:10:34.480 --> 0:10:37.440
<v Speaker 2>We just want to be patient with our investment case,

0:10:37.840 --> 0:10:41.640
<v Speaker 2>try to grow together with the portfolio company. And this

0:10:41.840 --> 0:10:44.480
<v Speaker 2>so called evaluation GAT really need to give them time

0:10:44.600 --> 0:10:48.080
<v Speaker 2>to close. If you look at our portful companies, a

0:10:48.080 --> 0:10:50.400
<v Speaker 2>lot of them we have been holding them for more

0:10:50.440 --> 0:10:54.200
<v Speaker 2>than a decade. Then that Eve is a good example.

0:10:54.960 --> 0:11:00.000
<v Speaker 2>Is a gaming company in China, we have holded more

0:11:00.000 --> 0:11:02.959
<v Speaker 2>more than a decade. If you hold on to the

0:11:03.000 --> 0:11:05.840
<v Speaker 2>stock over the past ten years is pretty much has

0:11:05.880 --> 0:11:08.840
<v Speaker 2>gone through a lot of volatility or in the market

0:11:09.280 --> 0:11:13.520
<v Speaker 2>in terms of regulations as well as surprise. But marketcab

0:11:13.800 --> 0:11:18.080
<v Speaker 2>has grown over six times. But that just shows that

0:11:18.600 --> 0:11:22.960
<v Speaker 2>the power of stay in the seat, understanding the stock

0:11:23.040 --> 0:11:27.720
<v Speaker 2>level drivers behind a single company. And last but not Lesia,

0:11:27.880 --> 0:11:32.800
<v Speaker 2>we are comparing vests. This follows a more classic capital

0:11:32.840 --> 0:11:36.360
<v Speaker 2>cycle if we try to find areas of the market

0:11:36.400 --> 0:11:41.080
<v Speaker 2>that the other investors might not like. If a sector

0:11:41.280 --> 0:11:45.560
<v Speaker 2>or company is staffed of capital, staft of investment, that's

0:11:45.640 --> 0:11:50.240
<v Speaker 2>exactly when the remaining winners of the sector could enjoy

0:11:50.440 --> 0:11:53.600
<v Speaker 2>higher return as well as having the price and power

0:11:53.679 --> 0:11:57.960
<v Speaker 2>over that customers. So those are the three t pulars

0:11:58.080 --> 0:12:01.400
<v Speaker 2>I would say about how we Asia and generally are

0:12:01.800 --> 0:12:03.479
<v Speaker 2>for our investors.

0:12:04.120 --> 0:12:06.560
<v Speaker 1>Okay, and in the region with thousands and thousands of

0:12:06.600 --> 0:12:09.400
<v Speaker 1>listed companies, how do you narrow your universe down to

0:12:09.480 --> 0:12:14.040
<v Speaker 1>even begin to analyze those companies. I think, in contrary Wetter,

0:12:14.520 --> 0:12:17.720
<v Speaker 1>a lot of times we would try to identify opportunity

0:12:17.920 --> 0:12:22.679
<v Speaker 1>in the sectors in the countries that other people might

0:12:22.720 --> 0:12:26.000
<v Speaker 1>say not investable. I think a good example to look

0:12:26.040 --> 0:12:29.720
<v Speaker 1>at is China, probably twenty four months ago, but most

0:12:29.800 --> 0:12:33.040
<v Speaker 1>glowing investors were shown away from that market.

0:12:33.200 --> 0:12:38.679
<v Speaker 2>But we are actually seeing world leading companies being thrown

0:12:38.720 --> 0:12:43.040
<v Speaker 2>out of the bath water trading at extremely cheap multiples. Yes,

0:12:43.240 --> 0:12:47.080
<v Speaker 2>there are macro conferms, but it doesn't really impact the

0:12:47.120 --> 0:12:51.800
<v Speaker 2>fundamental of the company that we invest in. They still

0:12:52.120 --> 0:12:55.560
<v Speaker 2>gain market share, they still try to improve their margin.

0:12:56.160 --> 0:12:58.320
<v Speaker 2>A good example that we have picked up over the

0:12:58.360 --> 0:13:02.520
<v Speaker 2>path few years h World. It's one of the leading

0:13:02.720 --> 0:13:05.720
<v Speaker 2>hotel chain operator in China, so a bit like HILT

0:13:05.800 --> 0:13:09.760
<v Speaker 2>them and what they did in China was extremely good.

0:13:10.200 --> 0:13:13.600
<v Speaker 2>Throughout the extended COVID lockdown. They tried to gain more

0:13:13.920 --> 0:13:18.080
<v Speaker 2>market share as well as improved their operating efficiency. So

0:13:18.280 --> 0:13:22.559
<v Speaker 2>they come out of the whole CHRISTI being much lainer,

0:13:22.600 --> 0:13:27.840
<v Speaker 2>operation much higher margie. So we are very happy with

0:13:28.080 --> 0:13:32.440
<v Speaker 2>the operational performance of the company, but with what's going

0:13:32.480 --> 0:13:36.520
<v Speaker 2>on with the macro noises. HROs training out an extreme

0:13:36.679 --> 0:13:41.800
<v Speaker 2>discount as compared to the global gears. Okay, interesting, and

0:13:41.840 --> 0:13:45.360
<v Speaker 2>what about dividends and income? And I see the trust

0:13:45.360 --> 0:13:48.720
<v Speaker 2>has a reasonably high dividend yield three and a half.

0:13:48.960 --> 0:13:51.000
<v Speaker 2>How important to that is that to you when you

0:13:51.080 --> 0:13:54.720
<v Speaker 2>are stop picking? Yeah, so I think that's another common

0:13:54.720 --> 0:13:58.240
<v Speaker 2>misconception maybe of some of the investors of Asia. The

0:13:58.360 --> 0:14:02.040
<v Speaker 2>might think Asia is more growthy less dividend. We have

0:14:02.280 --> 0:14:05.679
<v Speaker 2>really seen a partigm shift in that over the past

0:14:05.960 --> 0:14:10.480
<v Speaker 2>five years. Korea is a good example. We've discussed briefly earlier.

0:14:11.120 --> 0:14:14.360
<v Speaker 2>The value our initiatives is really trying to drive the

0:14:14.440 --> 0:14:18.120
<v Speaker 2>Korean corporate to increase their shareholder return in the form

0:14:18.160 --> 0:14:21.560
<v Speaker 2>of dividend as well as buyback, so that has their

0:14:21.600 --> 0:14:26.680
<v Speaker 2>significant improved that markets dividend yield. And then if you

0:14:26.760 --> 0:14:30.120
<v Speaker 2>look across Asia, similar stories could be found in Singapore

0:14:30.320 --> 0:14:33.600
<v Speaker 2>as well as even the Chinese state owned enterprises. They

0:14:33.640 --> 0:14:37.120
<v Speaker 2>have all driven up their shareholder return over the past

0:14:37.160 --> 0:14:40.280
<v Speaker 2>few years. The Asia as a region, we can get

0:14:40.280 --> 0:14:44.880
<v Speaker 2>a dividend yield about two percent on the bus and

0:14:44.920 --> 0:14:47.680
<v Speaker 2>then for the trust, we actually have a bonus scheme

0:14:47.840 --> 0:14:49.920
<v Speaker 2>in the sense that we pay out four percent of

0:14:49.960 --> 0:14:55.040
<v Speaker 2>the need to our trust holders, so that give it

0:14:55.080 --> 0:14:59.960
<v Speaker 2>a bit more gig on top of the regional index field.

0:15:00.680 --> 0:15:03.480
<v Speaker 1>Okay, so this is using this ability that is peculiar

0:15:03.520 --> 0:15:05.720
<v Speaker 1>to the investment trust industry, where you can pay out

0:15:05.760 --> 0:15:07.960
<v Speaker 1>part of the capital as income and a lot of trust.

0:15:08.080 --> 0:15:10.040
<v Speaker 1>Now do this paying out four percent a year to

0:15:10.080 --> 0:15:13.400
<v Speaker 1>give investors maybe aimed particularly at older investors, to make

0:15:13.400 --> 0:15:16.600
<v Speaker 1>sure they get a regular income every year, regardless of

0:15:16.640 --> 0:15:19.280
<v Speaker 1>the actual income level of the trust exactly.

0:15:19.320 --> 0:15:22.040
<v Speaker 2>And the majority of that dividend is funded by the

0:15:22.120 --> 0:15:25.840
<v Speaker 2>trust dividend received from world Fuller company, but the additional

0:15:25.880 --> 0:15:26.920
<v Speaker 2>come from the capitol.

0:15:48.960 --> 0:15:50.560
<v Speaker 1>Why don't we have a look at some of your

0:15:50.760 --> 0:15:55.080
<v Speaker 1>biggest markets individually. So you said earlier that you were

0:15:55.480 --> 0:15:58.200
<v Speaker 1>invested in China when everyone else was running slightly scared

0:15:58.800 --> 0:16:01.320
<v Speaker 1>a little while ago. Are you still pretty bullished on

0:16:01.400 --> 0:16:04.480
<v Speaker 1>China or is that move gone as far as it's

0:16:04.520 --> 0:16:05.400
<v Speaker 1>going to go. Do you think?

0:16:06.040 --> 0:16:09.160
<v Speaker 2>I think China might not be the bargain vein like

0:16:09.280 --> 0:16:11.880
<v Speaker 2>what we have seen two years back, given how much

0:16:12.000 --> 0:16:16.280
<v Speaker 2>the market has rallied. But then again, I think it

0:16:16.400 --> 0:16:19.840
<v Speaker 2>is a big market with steps as well as bread

0:16:19.960 --> 0:16:23.760
<v Speaker 2>for bottom up stock pickers like ourselves to really find

0:16:23.800 --> 0:16:29.920
<v Speaker 2>the attractives value for our trust holders, so we remain

0:16:30.200 --> 0:16:33.440
<v Speaker 2>invested in the market. I actually brought the trust border

0:16:33.520 --> 0:16:36.960
<v Speaker 2>directors to train the trip and of last year. I

0:16:37.000 --> 0:16:41.360
<v Speaker 2>think everyone was just amazed by the level of development

0:16:41.520 --> 0:16:45.120
<v Speaker 2>that we have observed over the past two years, because

0:16:45.120 --> 0:16:48.800
<v Speaker 2>we do the trip every other year and it's just

0:16:48.960 --> 0:16:51.960
<v Speaker 2>amazing to see some of the robotics company, look at

0:16:52.000 --> 0:16:55.960
<v Speaker 2>the Eedy company on the progress that they have made

0:16:56.200 --> 0:16:59.720
<v Speaker 2>in terms of products, in terms of their cops. So again,

0:16:59.800 --> 0:17:03.160
<v Speaker 2>there there is just so many opportunities for us to

0:17:03.280 --> 0:17:08.080
<v Speaker 2>pick from. That's why we remain excited about investing.

0:17:08.359 --> 0:17:10.960
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, I suppose that the pushback against that would be

0:17:11.000 --> 0:17:15.320
<v Speaker 1>that it's not necessarily the case that either economic growth

0:17:15.600 --> 0:17:19.720
<v Speaker 1>or that technological development will translate into rising share prices

0:17:19.840 --> 0:17:23.240
<v Speaker 1>in a difficult political environment. Yeah, I think this.

0:17:23.880 --> 0:17:27.920
<v Speaker 2>Political environment actually that's probably one of the main conferences

0:17:27.960 --> 0:17:30.800
<v Speaker 2>that people have as well as the other one is

0:17:30.840 --> 0:17:34.040
<v Speaker 2>the housing market. That one of the most common pushbacks

0:17:34.080 --> 0:17:38.280
<v Speaker 2>that we get from clients. But the reality, I think

0:17:38.480 --> 0:17:42.920
<v Speaker 2>the covering the policy regime do provide a very good

0:17:43.119 --> 0:17:47.680
<v Speaker 2>sort of environment for technology companies to develop their products,

0:17:48.280 --> 0:17:51.119
<v Speaker 2>and that progress that we have seen in terms of

0:17:51.160 --> 0:17:55.959
<v Speaker 2>ev robotics in the AI trinity China, and then on

0:17:56.000 --> 0:18:00.359
<v Speaker 2>the other side of the housing market housing bubble. China

0:18:00.480 --> 0:18:04.679
<v Speaker 2>fortunate enough to avoid a b of housing bubble. It

0:18:04.760 --> 0:18:08.359
<v Speaker 2>has been a very painful sort of eRating carried for

0:18:08.480 --> 0:18:12.440
<v Speaker 2>the reality date sector, for the reality developer. But do

0:18:12.440 --> 0:18:15.080
<v Speaker 2>you think it's a better shut up then let everything

0:18:15.240 --> 0:18:18.080
<v Speaker 2>run to the hillcop and then suddenly birthed That might

0:18:18.119 --> 0:18:20.720
<v Speaker 2>take China ten or even twenty years to come back

0:18:20.760 --> 0:18:21.400
<v Speaker 2>where it were.

0:18:22.040 --> 0:18:23.439
<v Speaker 1>So it has been.

0:18:23.280 --> 0:18:26.320
<v Speaker 2>Painful, But for the firm itself, I think we have

0:18:26.440 --> 0:18:31.160
<v Speaker 2>avoided a lot of the real state investment in China itself.

0:18:31.720 --> 0:18:35.200
<v Speaker 2>Now we are actually getting a little bit more hopeful

0:18:35.280 --> 0:18:38.680
<v Speaker 2>of what to come with this sector because regulations start

0:18:39.160 --> 0:18:41.520
<v Speaker 2>to lose them a little bit more and we start

0:18:41.560 --> 0:18:45.680
<v Speaker 2>to see activities take up here there, especially in Hong Kong.

0:18:46.280 --> 0:18:49.439
<v Speaker 2>So when the market is deal fall, maybe it's a

0:18:49.480 --> 0:18:51.800
<v Speaker 2>sector that we can spend more time on and try

0:18:51.840 --> 0:18:53.240
<v Speaker 2>to do a little bit more.

0:18:53.280 --> 0:18:55.920
<v Speaker 1>I suppose it's two things to say about the housing

0:18:56.400 --> 0:18:59.919
<v Speaker 1>residential construction problem in China. The first is that without

0:19:00.080 --> 0:19:03.080
<v Speaker 1>household formation, it's quite difficult for that market to pick

0:19:03.160 --> 0:19:06.320
<v Speaker 1>up again. And if we're talking about very fast falling

0:19:06.400 --> 0:19:10.440
<v Speaker 1>fertility and a smaller number of babies, smaller number of marriages.

0:19:10.520 --> 0:19:14.640
<v Speaker 1>It's household formation that drives housing purchase, right, So that's

0:19:14.840 --> 0:19:15.800
<v Speaker 1>that's a problem.

0:19:16.000 --> 0:19:17.960
<v Speaker 2>So I think that was one of the key reasons

0:19:17.960 --> 0:19:21.159
<v Speaker 2>why we stayed away. You know, pricing was affordability was

0:19:21.320 --> 0:19:24.679
<v Speaker 2>very poor, especially in the bigger cities, the capital studies

0:19:24.760 --> 0:19:27.640
<v Speaker 2>of China, and then house information weigh as well as

0:19:27.640 --> 0:19:31.280
<v Speaker 2>the true immigration into the Tier one cities is slowing down.

0:19:31.640 --> 0:19:35.439
<v Speaker 2>So all that just doesn't support the demand side of saints.

0:19:35.520 --> 0:19:38.400
<v Speaker 2>And then looking at the supply I think five years

0:19:38.400 --> 0:19:42.480
<v Speaker 2>ago to keep coming up into the train to market,

0:19:42.640 --> 0:19:47.040
<v Speaker 2>but later over the past five years that is committed many. Oh,

0:19:47.119 --> 0:19:49.600
<v Speaker 2>then it's really a question of when the supply demand

0:19:49.720 --> 0:19:51.760
<v Speaker 2>can bat us out. So we find a bottom of

0:19:51.800 --> 0:19:55.320
<v Speaker 2>the pricing cycle in Chyna real estate market, we start

0:19:55.359 --> 0:19:59.560
<v Speaker 2>to see some fint of that might STUPI supposially.

0:19:59.560 --> 0:20:02.320
<v Speaker 1>The other things about it is that a huge amount

0:20:02.400 --> 0:20:05.560
<v Speaker 1>of the Chinese population savings have traditionally gone into properties,

0:20:05.640 --> 0:20:08.360
<v Speaker 1>as seventy percent of NetWorld is tied up in property,

0:20:08.600 --> 0:20:11.359
<v Speaker 1>and any shift away from that into people maybe putting

0:20:11.359 --> 0:20:13.959
<v Speaker 1>their savings into the market instead or possibly something more

0:20:14.000 --> 0:20:19.000
<v Speaker 1>productive than blocks of flats is a positive long term positive.

0:20:19.200 --> 0:20:22.240
<v Speaker 2>Definitely, and I and we start to notice them any

0:20:22.240 --> 0:20:27.240
<v Speaker 2>more money on travel experiences, especially the younger population locally,

0:20:27.280 --> 0:20:30.240
<v Speaker 2>back again to the age world investment is also trying

0:20:30.280 --> 0:20:35.000
<v Speaker 2>to really understand what the new generations want. They might

0:20:35.040 --> 0:20:37.520
<v Speaker 2>not want to spend all the savings our house, but

0:20:37.600 --> 0:20:39.760
<v Speaker 2>because I had a small money here and there, a

0:20:39.880 --> 0:20:45.080
<v Speaker 2>costumer product or traveling to really increase the enjoyment of

0:20:45.119 --> 0:20:46.080
<v Speaker 2>their lack. Yeah.

0:20:46.119 --> 0:20:48.199
<v Speaker 1>So do you think that consumer boom that we've been

0:20:48.200 --> 0:20:50.240
<v Speaker 1>waiting for in China for such a long time might

0:20:50.320 --> 0:20:52.240
<v Speaker 1>finally be nearly upon us.

0:20:52.600 --> 0:20:56.000
<v Speaker 2>I think everyone has grewn up for the housing market

0:20:56.080 --> 0:21:00.240
<v Speaker 2>to rebound, and the infection of the stock market has

0:21:00.280 --> 0:21:06.800
<v Speaker 2>certainly enriched a certain group of the Chinese consumers. They

0:21:06.960 --> 0:21:10.840
<v Speaker 2>have hand up demand for quite a while. Now they

0:21:11.240 --> 0:21:14.399
<v Speaker 2>start to feel happy and try to span again. I

0:21:14.920 --> 0:21:18.080
<v Speaker 2>think in the past investor also had a misconception that

0:21:18.160 --> 0:21:23.480
<v Speaker 2>the consumption in China equals to housing price. But it's

0:21:23.560 --> 0:21:26.679
<v Speaker 2>not like that. It doesn't happen everywhere in the world.

0:21:27.640 --> 0:21:30.040
<v Speaker 2>Even the UK housing price hasn't done off, hasn't done well.

0:21:30.080 --> 0:21:33.119
<v Speaker 2>I think the UK costumers you spand and so I

0:21:33.119 --> 0:21:35.560
<v Speaker 2>think Chinese our serios are coming out of that cycle

0:21:36.040 --> 0:21:40.879
<v Speaker 2>and they do want to band in certain areas. So

0:21:40.960 --> 0:21:43.920
<v Speaker 2>again that or because we just have to find out

0:21:44.080 --> 0:21:46.520
<v Speaker 2>where they want to span, which companies can gain more

0:21:46.520 --> 0:21:49.159
<v Speaker 2>market share, we are to write that way, what.

0:21:49.280 --> 0:21:51.000
<v Speaker 1>Of the sectors are you interested in in China? Then

0:21:51.040 --> 0:21:53.159
<v Speaker 1>we talked about the hotel company as they say, this

0:21:53.240 --> 0:21:56.000
<v Speaker 1>is such a massive market, where are you focused for?

0:21:56.960 --> 0:21:58.280
<v Speaker 1>So another top.

0:21:58.160 --> 0:22:01.840
<v Speaker 2>Holding of the trust is is kinda resources to sphere.

0:22:02.440 --> 0:22:06.359
<v Speaker 2>So this is one of the largest brewery in China.

0:22:06.520 --> 0:22:10.160
<v Speaker 2>They have about twenty five percent market share. They used

0:22:10.160 --> 0:22:14.679
<v Speaker 2>to trade over fifty times prior to earnings Racial before

0:22:14.680 --> 0:22:20.120
<v Speaker 2>COVID and since the deflationary cycle and the consumption worry

0:22:20.240 --> 0:22:22.960
<v Speaker 2>in China hit the market, they now trade at the

0:22:23.160 --> 0:22:28.000
<v Speaker 2>low King's price to earning Racial, a level that we

0:22:28.119 --> 0:22:34.080
<v Speaker 2>see extremely attractive. But what has uh There is constant

0:22:34.080 --> 0:22:36.920
<v Speaker 2>concern about the Again, the younger people do not want

0:22:36.960 --> 0:22:41.040
<v Speaker 2>to drink anymore, I do a blot to their health consciousness. Again,

0:22:41.400 --> 0:22:45.800
<v Speaker 2>China resource spear do have their own narratives of increasing

0:22:45.920 --> 0:22:51.240
<v Speaker 2>their brand premiumization. They acquire the Heinecome brand, their China

0:22:51.320 --> 0:22:55.360
<v Speaker 2>operation about five six years ago. I think then they

0:22:55.400 --> 0:22:59.800
<v Speaker 2>have integrated the product distribution into their portfolio, continue to increase,

0:23:00.560 --> 0:23:04.080
<v Speaker 2>brought up volume as the percentage of total volume, and

0:23:04.160 --> 0:23:08.280
<v Speaker 2>that premiumization really helped them with ASP growth as well

0:23:08.320 --> 0:23:14.000
<v Speaker 2>as Marti expansion. I just think the current evaluation doesn't

0:23:14.320 --> 0:23:19.080
<v Speaker 2>give them justice, and management has been increasing trailholder return

0:23:19.200 --> 0:23:23.400
<v Speaker 2>aggressively old harp years very backfully. We get paid while

0:23:23.400 --> 0:23:28.040
<v Speaker 2>waiting for market to realize the underline value of this company.

0:23:28.520 --> 0:23:32.080
<v Speaker 1>Can we talk a bit about about Korea, which, as

0:23:32.080 --> 0:23:33.840
<v Speaker 1>I said, I wrote about the bet eighteen months ago,

0:23:33.920 --> 0:23:36.320
<v Speaker 1>so saying like this is following the corporate governance path

0:23:36.600 --> 0:23:39.640
<v Speaker 1>of Japan and its too cheap, and it has done

0:23:39.640 --> 0:23:41.800
<v Speaker 1>that to a large degree, followed that path, and in

0:23:41.880 --> 0:23:45.960
<v Speaker 1>regulatory terms, certainly, but it's not really cheap anymore, is it? Yes?

0:23:46.000 --> 0:23:49.680
<v Speaker 2>And no? I guess, because I guess Korea has done

0:23:49.760 --> 0:23:53.840
<v Speaker 2>extremely well. Twenty thirty five, its doubled in the US

0:23:53.920 --> 0:23:56.639
<v Speaker 2>dollar term, almost double US dollar term, and then it

0:23:56.720 --> 0:24:01.200
<v Speaker 2>had hit several street spots. The value up government initiatives.

0:24:01.200 --> 0:24:04.360
<v Speaker 2>Have you highlighted The second one is really the strong

0:24:04.640 --> 0:24:09.080
<v Speaker 2>clical upturn of the memory cycle and the Spianic Sometimes

0:24:09.080 --> 0:24:13.800
<v Speaker 2>electronics make a big proportion of the coffeing decks, and

0:24:15.080 --> 0:24:18.520
<v Speaker 2>I would say historically we always have to view the

0:24:18.800 --> 0:24:23.359
<v Speaker 2>Korean discount for poor shareholder return for corporate government is

0:24:23.400 --> 0:24:29.119
<v Speaker 2>a bit exaggerated. A lot of the companies we owned

0:24:29.160 --> 0:24:33.240
<v Speaker 2>for years in our portfolio have actually been steadily increasing

0:24:33.320 --> 0:24:37.760
<v Speaker 2>their shareholder return uh the top down initiative from the

0:24:37.800 --> 0:24:42.679
<v Speaker 2>government to do it are board based with their characteristics

0:24:42.800 --> 0:24:47.320
<v Speaker 2>initiatives that really changed investors mindset of the market. So

0:24:47.320 --> 0:24:52.480
<v Speaker 2>suddenly we have seen are the board based stock cascelation

0:24:52.720 --> 0:24:57.840
<v Speaker 2>by bad term re shared cascelation and increase in payout, etcetera.

0:24:58.040 --> 0:25:01.719
<v Speaker 2>And a lot of our populo company just continue their

0:25:02.160 --> 0:25:06.040
<v Speaker 2>past and all of this basically narrow the so called

0:25:06.160 --> 0:25:09.040
<v Speaker 2>Korean discount that we have seen in the past. And

0:25:09.040 --> 0:25:11.639
<v Speaker 2>then for the memory cycle, I think it's just completely

0:25:11.720 --> 0:25:17.480
<v Speaker 2>separate from this theme memories they look at forty years ago,

0:25:17.640 --> 0:25:20.920
<v Speaker 2>there are money or even more memory producers out there,

0:25:20.960 --> 0:25:23.200
<v Speaker 2>and fart forward to where we are today. As the

0:25:23.320 --> 0:25:26.560
<v Speaker 2>series of aggressive competition, we pretty much only left with

0:25:26.960 --> 0:25:31.879
<v Speaker 2>three global eating players. That oligopolistic structures just made this

0:25:32.040 --> 0:25:36.280
<v Speaker 2>industry a lot more predictable as competitive before, and if

0:25:36.280 --> 0:25:38.080
<v Speaker 2>we look at what they have done over the past

0:25:38.080 --> 0:25:41.159
<v Speaker 2>few years, they have been burned in the last cycle,

0:25:41.760 --> 0:25:46.200
<v Speaker 2>so they had decided to all keep their capects a

0:25:46.280 --> 0:25:49.520
<v Speaker 2>lot more rational. So the supy that we have seen

0:25:49.920 --> 0:25:52.679
<v Speaker 2>in the past few years, she's been picked eyed and

0:25:52.760 --> 0:25:56.919
<v Speaker 2>the AI demand search definitely not in all of the

0:25:56.920 --> 0:26:01.399
<v Speaker 2>memory producers three years back. As a result of that,

0:26:01.440 --> 0:26:05.399
<v Speaker 2>we have just seen this extreme bomb in any of

0:26:05.440 --> 0:26:07.760
<v Speaker 2>the memory bus that you name it. It had gone

0:26:07.800 --> 0:26:13.280
<v Speaker 2>up oh at the unprecedented rate, even though all of

0:26:13.280 --> 0:26:16.800
<v Speaker 2>them are dividing to increasee that back in twentynine six,

0:26:16.960 --> 0:26:19.879
<v Speaker 2>we won't be that supply coming to the market probably

0:26:20.040 --> 0:26:24.480
<v Speaker 2>seven or eight, which means the type supply and this

0:26:24.720 --> 0:26:28.560
<v Speaker 2>will remain for the remainder of the year. As for

0:26:28.680 --> 0:26:32.200
<v Speaker 2>the fund with days in memory, but again we talk

0:26:32.240 --> 0:26:35.720
<v Speaker 2>about how we invest with the valuation discipline. With where

0:26:35.760 --> 0:26:39.000
<v Speaker 2>show price had been over the past year, the level

0:26:39.000 --> 0:26:41.720
<v Speaker 2>of return would has come down, so we just takes

0:26:41.720 --> 0:26:42.840
<v Speaker 2>some off off the table.

0:26:43.240 --> 0:26:46.000
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, so feeling a little bubbly, I mean that that

0:26:46.119 --> 0:26:49.159
<v Speaker 1>scene translates across to Taiwan right where tech is the

0:26:49.240 --> 0:26:51.240
<v Speaker 1>big driver. Are you happy there?

0:26:51.840 --> 0:26:57.200
<v Speaker 2>So Taiwan is the AI theme is a very prevalent

0:26:57.920 --> 0:27:02.320
<v Speaker 2>uh and more broad based as compared to Korea. So

0:27:02.480 --> 0:27:06.159
<v Speaker 2>for Taiwan our topic in the market TSMT, would you

0:27:06.240 --> 0:27:11.880
<v Speaker 2>be them as the uncontested global leader in foundry space.

0:27:12.400 --> 0:27:15.480
<v Speaker 2>And if you look at the Ai revolution Global revolution,

0:27:16.560 --> 0:27:22.439
<v Speaker 2>SMCS basically steal the engine behind all of that. That

0:27:22.520 --> 0:27:25.800
<v Speaker 2>remains as the biggest holding of the trust. But then

0:27:25.920 --> 0:27:28.639
<v Speaker 2>there are selective pockets of the talentice market. We do

0:27:28.800 --> 0:27:32.639
<v Speaker 2>think expectation is extremely high in terms of the volume

0:27:32.720 --> 0:27:36.840
<v Speaker 2>treatment of the product content creation, the dollar content of

0:27:36.880 --> 0:27:39.600
<v Speaker 2>the products in the Ai further as well as the

0:27:39.720 --> 0:27:44.440
<v Speaker 2>Marji expansion that people expect some of the talentice companies

0:27:44.480 --> 0:27:47.639
<v Speaker 2>to experience. So we do have an out of the

0:27:47.640 --> 0:27:51.560
<v Speaker 2>way position in Taiwan right now, just because the heightened

0:27:51.640 --> 0:27:56.080
<v Speaker 2>expectation heightened the variation that's compared to history, the gruct

0:27:56.080 --> 0:27:59.080
<v Speaker 2>real world doesn't look at the attractive for the BODER market.

0:27:59.560 --> 0:28:01.520
<v Speaker 1>Thinking with Taiwan, how much of a concern is that

0:28:01.560 --> 0:28:06.040
<v Speaker 1>when you're investing in Taiwan that intense geopolitical stress. Yeah,

0:28:06.119 --> 0:28:07.800
<v Speaker 1>I think it's definitely.

0:28:07.359 --> 0:28:10.040
<v Speaker 2>A count that we have. We always keep back of

0:28:10.119 --> 0:28:12.639
<v Speaker 2>a mind because for my team, we don't just manage

0:28:12.720 --> 0:28:16.040
<v Speaker 2>Asian money off emerge market money. And we have actually

0:28:16.080 --> 0:28:21.480
<v Speaker 2>been to the Russian situation. So you know, two years

0:28:21.480 --> 0:28:24.199
<v Speaker 2>ago when we talk about what China is investing, or

0:28:24.240 --> 0:28:27.639
<v Speaker 2>want to key debate whether the training market, if anything

0:28:27.720 --> 0:28:31.080
<v Speaker 2>happened to Taiwan between Taiwan and China, that the Chinese

0:28:31.160 --> 0:28:34.560
<v Speaker 2>market could effectively go to zero in our index. So

0:28:34.640 --> 0:28:38.680
<v Speaker 2>that's a risk we constantly discuss. But then you know,

0:28:38.760 --> 0:28:41.600
<v Speaker 2>investors give us money to try to manage a portfolio

0:28:41.640 --> 0:28:45.960
<v Speaker 2>of Asia assets. We do take think geopolitical risks in

0:28:46.000 --> 0:28:49.440
<v Speaker 2>the consideration, but I do think our end investors they

0:28:49.440 --> 0:28:52.080
<v Speaker 2>want to have a blod based exposure to the Asia region.

0:28:52.240 --> 0:28:55.360
<v Speaker 2>Otherwise they could have chosen a bit more of a

0:28:55.400 --> 0:28:59.920
<v Speaker 2>country allocation, try to avoid investing China or invest in Taiwan.

0:29:00.280 --> 0:29:02.560
<v Speaker 2>Is they do want to have an Asia fund. Our

0:29:02.640 --> 0:29:06.400
<v Speaker 2>job is really try to manage all this risking a colturists,

0:29:06.440 --> 0:29:09.720
<v Speaker 2>the tariff risk, all of these things. Try to take

0:29:10.160 --> 0:29:13.960
<v Speaker 2>all of my stocks that have the minimizing impact from

0:29:14.160 --> 0:29:19.800
<v Speaker 2>any of this. And TFMC being the biggest holding the trust,

0:29:19.960 --> 0:29:25.040
<v Speaker 2>I do think their diversification of their foundries across the region,

0:29:25.200 --> 0:29:27.760
<v Speaker 2>and that goes to the US is the right strategy

0:29:28.320 --> 0:29:31.520
<v Speaker 2>for them to survive the long term.

0:29:31.560 --> 0:29:35.000
<v Speaker 1>So what are your the main worries? We worry about geopolitics,

0:29:35.080 --> 0:29:37.600
<v Speaker 1>obviously worry a lot about valuations in the extent which

0:29:37.640 --> 0:29:41.080
<v Speaker 1>particularly AAR related stocks are in any kind of bubble territory.

0:29:41.160 --> 0:29:44.080
<v Speaker 1>Less So, now, obviously what else have these a long

0:29:44.400 --> 0:29:46.400
<v Speaker 1>list of potential risks? What are the ones that keep

0:29:46.440 --> 0:29:49.400
<v Speaker 1>you up at night? Again, it's a bottom up topicker.

0:29:49.520 --> 0:29:51.400
<v Speaker 2>So I do have a few things that I like

0:29:51.920 --> 0:29:54.000
<v Speaker 2>it give me awake a night. I think the first

0:29:54.040 --> 0:29:58.760
<v Speaker 2>thing is try to not overpay with magician defensive for

0:29:59.120 --> 0:30:02.720
<v Speaker 2>individual stocks, for individual markets, I try to stay away

0:30:02.760 --> 0:30:05.719
<v Speaker 2>from it. I think India being example. All that so

0:30:05.800 --> 0:30:08.320
<v Speaker 2>that was one of the market we were aggressively on

0:30:08.360 --> 0:30:13.239
<v Speaker 2>the way being the second half of twenty three. That

0:30:13.440 --> 0:30:16.280
<v Speaker 2>is just the nerves ritical old pay. You don't want

0:30:16.280 --> 0:30:19.840
<v Speaker 2>to be the last one to buy the hype. And

0:30:19.920 --> 0:30:23.000
<v Speaker 2>then the second risk I think about is my company's

0:30:23.120 --> 0:30:27.240
<v Speaker 2>alan sheet. But do you see that as a heavy backpack.

0:30:27.560 --> 0:30:30.520
<v Speaker 2>But the road is flat, anyone can carry it when

0:30:30.520 --> 0:30:32.960
<v Speaker 2>you hit a hill. Really, the one with a heavy

0:30:33.120 --> 0:30:35.920
<v Speaker 2>dead can be dragged down. I want to pick the

0:30:35.960 --> 0:30:39.200
<v Speaker 2>stocks by Stanton in Western to be the marathon winners.

0:30:39.520 --> 0:30:42.720
<v Speaker 2>So I do pay a lot of attention to company

0:30:42.880 --> 0:30:47.080
<v Speaker 2>s boansheet and then laugh not this resputation. Is my

0:30:47.160 --> 0:30:50.640
<v Speaker 2>portfolio diversified enough? Is it just being driven by this

0:30:50.960 --> 0:30:55.240
<v Speaker 2>super EI cycle or there is? I actually wander sure

0:30:55.280 --> 0:31:00.440
<v Speaker 2>there is a wide range of drivers, sectors, idiosyncretic drivers

0:31:00.480 --> 0:31:04.960
<v Speaker 2>of the individual company that if one road hit the bomb,

0:31:05.200 --> 0:31:07.680
<v Speaker 2>the other one will actually make it all right.

0:31:08.000 --> 0:31:11.000
<v Speaker 1>And how are you managing currency risk? Lots of talk

0:31:11.000 --> 0:31:13.960
<v Speaker 1>about China and currencies at the moment, but where the

0:31:14.000 --> 0:31:16.520
<v Speaker 1>dollar might go from here and how that relationship might

0:31:16.560 --> 0:31:18.000
<v Speaker 1>work out? How do you think about that?

0:31:18.920 --> 0:31:21.320
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, the reality is if you think about the Asia,

0:31:21.400 --> 0:31:26.040
<v Speaker 2>currencies still have been relatively stable versus each other over

0:31:26.120 --> 0:31:30.400
<v Speaker 2>the longer term. I think last year was the if

0:31:31.080 --> 0:31:34.680
<v Speaker 2>native prominence the reversion of that trend, but that is

0:31:34.800 --> 0:31:38.920
<v Speaker 2>mostly of a US dollar weakness against all the currencies.

0:31:39.560 --> 0:31:42.160
<v Speaker 2>So Taiwan is a good example. We see a sudden

0:31:42.200 --> 0:31:45.720
<v Speaker 2>step up in the Tawan dollar again against the US

0:31:45.760 --> 0:31:48.320
<v Speaker 2>dollar at one point in twenty twenty five.

0:31:48.400 --> 0:31:50.440
<v Speaker 1>That really did market a big shock.

0:31:51.440 --> 0:31:55.560
<v Speaker 2>But what is the good from the Tawanese company is

0:31:55.800 --> 0:31:58.240
<v Speaker 2>they do have a lot of revenue as well as

0:31:58.320 --> 0:32:03.600
<v Speaker 2>coch in the US dollar. Even with the magnet currency appreciation,

0:32:03.880 --> 0:32:07.960
<v Speaker 2>we have actually seen the company level managed on pretty well.

0:32:08.920 --> 0:32:10.520
<v Speaker 2>So it's a black thing that we have in that.

0:32:10.680 --> 0:32:15.520
<v Speaker 2>Seeing Asia, there's no major currency shocks that we have

0:32:15.640 --> 0:32:19.920
<v Speaker 2>seen so far. Touch Wood on China, I think they

0:32:20.040 --> 0:32:23.000
<v Speaker 2>are a lot more cautious with regard to how they

0:32:23.040 --> 0:32:27.320
<v Speaker 2>moved the currency. There was a a few years back.

0:32:27.720 --> 0:32:31.560
<v Speaker 2>I think suddenly that to bring a lot of negative

0:32:31.560 --> 0:32:34.960
<v Speaker 2>country quences with regard to capital outflow as well as

0:32:35.000 --> 0:32:40.560
<v Speaker 2>the how US a global all the other countries perceived China.

0:32:40.760 --> 0:32:44.160
<v Speaker 2>So now we can see them a lot steadier with

0:32:44.320 --> 0:32:49.400
<v Speaker 2>the CNY story age rate, you know, all of that.

0:32:49.680 --> 0:32:53.240
<v Speaker 2>For what remains for us, we really bring it down

0:32:53.240 --> 0:32:56.400
<v Speaker 2>to a Bottomas stock level. If this is an exporter,

0:32:56.560 --> 0:32:59.880
<v Speaker 2>we will be a lot more careful with their currently exposure.

0:33:00.680 --> 0:33:03.440
<v Speaker 2>But then a lot of the potful company are actually

0:33:03.440 --> 0:33:07.640
<v Speaker 2>domestic facing. Uh, they don't really need to manage that

0:33:07.760 --> 0:33:09.480
<v Speaker 2>currency rift to a Questionably.

0:33:10.240 --> 0:33:13.840
<v Speaker 1>Let's go back to India. So India expensive, any interesting

0:33:13.880 --> 0:33:16.920
<v Speaker 1>holdings there in their portfolio that aren't too expensively you're

0:33:16.920 --> 0:33:18.280
<v Speaker 1>happy with? Yeah?

0:33:18.320 --> 0:33:22.240
<v Speaker 2>So the founder is alway the Indian financial Again, we're

0:33:22.240 --> 0:33:25.120
<v Speaker 2>not trying to buy index. We try to buy the

0:33:25.160 --> 0:33:28.480
<v Speaker 2>stocks India at the index level, we're still sing is

0:33:28.720 --> 0:33:32.600
<v Speaker 2>expensive trading over twenty tnkey for the level of the

0:33:32.680 --> 0:33:37.320
<v Speaker 2>roles of the naxation not very attractive. But then selected

0:33:37.400 --> 0:33:41.080
<v Speaker 2>financial thing the Indian market looks very very interesting. Whina

0:33:41.240 --> 0:33:45.440
<v Speaker 2>did the polo company that we bought during the COVID

0:33:45.480 --> 0:33:51.360
<v Speaker 2>crisis did the non bank financial institution they give loan

0:33:51.680 --> 0:33:53.920
<v Speaker 2>like second half a second hand. All the loans go

0:33:54.120 --> 0:33:59.280
<v Speaker 2>loans to the rural as an easter that this company

0:33:59.360 --> 0:34:03.000
<v Speaker 2>has managed it credit cycle it truly well and grow

0:34:03.200 --> 0:34:06.360
<v Speaker 2>diversified a portfolio. First battle with the take a hand

0:34:06.720 --> 0:34:10.040
<v Speaker 2>all along them, gradually to all the other long segments

0:34:10.080 --> 0:34:16.240
<v Speaker 2>catering to the dainful holder customers through the here growing

0:34:16.320 --> 0:34:21.640
<v Speaker 2>together where we ran with be their shareholder and hoording

0:34:21.680 --> 0:34:25.759
<v Speaker 2>their growth. And we get a capital from being from

0:34:25.920 --> 0:34:29.520
<v Speaker 2>AMFT you one of the biggest Japanese financial institution to

0:34:29.680 --> 0:34:33.840
<v Speaker 2>giving them access to even cheaper credit andabling them to grow.

0:34:33.920 --> 0:34:36.239
<v Speaker 2>They have a target of growing their own book at

0:34:36.239 --> 0:34:41.000
<v Speaker 2>eighteen an for the next few years. So we are

0:34:41.440 --> 0:34:45.959
<v Speaker 2>dealt one of the top holdings in the trust okay.

0:34:45.800 --> 0:34:48.239
<v Speaker 1>Interesting, all right, Well let's escape to Vietnam, which was

0:34:48.280 --> 0:34:52.120
<v Speaker 1>always everyone's favorite emerging Asian market for a long time,

0:34:52.239 --> 0:34:54.600
<v Speaker 1>wasn't it. We had constant stories about Vietnam, and of

0:34:54.560 --> 0:34:58.160
<v Speaker 1>course sours some dedicated Vietnam trust. But how are you

0:34:58.160 --> 0:34:59.879
<v Speaker 1>feeling about that that story? Hole?

0:35:01.120 --> 0:35:05.760
<v Speaker 2>I think Vietnam has up and down, but also because

0:35:05.840 --> 0:35:09.240
<v Speaker 2>of the politics happening there, and what we are seeing

0:35:09.239 --> 0:35:11.960
<v Speaker 2>now is a period of the wealthy stable poltics that

0:35:12.080 --> 0:35:15.360
<v Speaker 2>you're provided in workers to really pick stocks. If I

0:35:15.400 --> 0:35:18.200
<v Speaker 2>look at the stocks in Vietnam, there are actually very

0:35:18.200 --> 0:35:21.919
<v Speaker 2>exciting a major companies to pick from. Recently we met

0:35:22.000 --> 0:35:26.200
<v Speaker 2>with the ID Services Company in Vietnam. They are trying

0:35:26.239 --> 0:35:29.080
<v Speaker 2>to address a different campto more cohord as compared to

0:35:29.160 --> 0:35:32.120
<v Speaker 2>the Indian IT Services Company. There be to be successful

0:35:32.160 --> 0:35:36.719
<v Speaker 2>and evaluation doesn't look too expensive, uh with all this

0:35:36.880 --> 0:35:40.640
<v Speaker 2>global AI trying to destroy IT Services company a software company,

0:35:41.160 --> 0:35:45.279
<v Speaker 2>something that we are practically working on. And then we

0:35:45.360 --> 0:35:48.400
<v Speaker 2>also owned some of the customer stables company in Vietnam.

0:35:49.480 --> 0:35:53.040
<v Speaker 2>In terms of the demographic trend, Vietnam, the aging population

0:35:53.200 --> 0:35:55.680
<v Speaker 2>is definitely at the slower pace as compared to other regions.

0:35:55.760 --> 0:35:58.360
<v Speaker 2>In the market we have been how the other customer

0:35:58.440 --> 0:36:01.560
<v Speaker 2>company has evolved in other market. So if you there

0:36:01.600 --> 0:36:06.480
<v Speaker 2>are pocket opportunities in Vietnam as well. I think as

0:36:06.560 --> 0:36:11.080
<v Speaker 2>for investors, we still face the contrain of ownership threshold.

0:36:11.280 --> 0:36:16.640
<v Speaker 2>The best company might not be available to buy for Invesco,

0:36:16.800 --> 0:36:19.799
<v Speaker 2>Arab and Frost that the struggle will continue to face

0:36:19.880 --> 0:36:23.400
<v Speaker 2>in a market over time. We have observed market access

0:36:23.520 --> 0:36:24.320
<v Speaker 2>has improved.

0:36:25.239 --> 0:36:27.600
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, And are there any smaller markets in the region

0:36:27.640 --> 0:36:31.080
<v Speaker 1>that people simply aren't paying attention to and should be. Yeah.

0:36:31.120 --> 0:36:34.320
<v Speaker 2>So I think Southeast Asia as the block is very interesting.

0:36:34.640 --> 0:36:37.520
<v Speaker 2>But we talk about the g gratification of global spy

0:36:37.640 --> 0:36:41.640
<v Speaker 2>tang China plus one. It benefits countries like not just Vietnam,

0:36:41.680 --> 0:36:45.080
<v Speaker 2>but also Thailand as well as Indonesia. And if you

0:36:45.120 --> 0:36:48.319
<v Speaker 2>look at the evaluation, extremely cheap right for CREATI about

0:36:48.360 --> 0:36:50.799
<v Speaker 2>one point three one point four times and as a

0:36:50.880 --> 0:36:53.200
<v Speaker 2>discount to your own training history as well as the

0:36:53.280 --> 0:36:56.560
<v Speaker 2>Asia global market. But then that a region all this

0:36:56.680 --> 0:37:01.800
<v Speaker 2>world creation from supply time digasifications and actually sustained decades

0:37:01.800 --> 0:37:04.880
<v Speaker 2>of growth, So you're really getting up from feed of

0:37:05.200 --> 0:37:08.640
<v Speaker 2>rapid growth at a garden price. We are all wait

0:37:08.960 --> 0:37:13.120
<v Speaker 2>in posses Asia having more based the sectory exposure there.

0:37:13.920 --> 0:37:15.839
<v Speaker 1>So all in all, Fiona, you would expect I think

0:37:15.880 --> 0:37:18.640
<v Speaker 1>this rotation maybe out of the US and into all

0:37:18.680 --> 0:37:20.799
<v Speaker 1>the countries that you're interested to continue over the next

0:37:20.800 --> 0:37:23.920
<v Speaker 1>couple of years. So even the evaluations across the region

0:37:23.960 --> 0:37:26.840
<v Speaker 1>are not as low as they were, it's still a

0:37:26.840 --> 0:37:30.560
<v Speaker 1>significant discount perhaps to the global markets as a whole.

0:37:30.960 --> 0:37:33.759
<v Speaker 1>So you I'm guessing here, assuming you're going to say yes,

0:37:33.920 --> 0:37:36.160
<v Speaker 1>pretty happy with your positions over the next year or so.

0:37:36.719 --> 0:37:40.680
<v Speaker 2>Yes, absolutely. I think for investors, you know, in twenty six,

0:37:40.719 --> 0:37:43.319
<v Speaker 2>maybe they should check their home buyers check whether they

0:37:43.320 --> 0:37:46.480
<v Speaker 2>are over exposed to US assets. Even as your own

0:37:46.640 --> 0:37:50.719
<v Speaker 2>SB five hundred index, your exposure to the US tech

0:37:50.840 --> 0:37:54.640
<v Speaker 2>might be over forty PREFN. A concentration risk is real.

0:37:55.120 --> 0:37:59.600
<v Speaker 2>So Asia do offer a cheaper alternatives. Getting you access

0:37:59.680 --> 0:38:03.680
<v Speaker 2>to a vast region of different countries and different sectory

0:38:03.719 --> 0:38:08.480
<v Speaker 2>exposure is a real damification, not just another hicker.

0:38:10.239 --> 0:38:12.160
<v Speaker 1>No, thank you so much for joining us today. That

0:38:12.280 --> 0:38:13.360
<v Speaker 1>was really interesting conversation.

0:38:13.960 --> 0:38:15.760
<v Speaker 2>Thank you Marion for having me, Ama Shall.

0:38:22.800 --> 0:38:25.000
<v Speaker 1>Thanks for listening to this week's Maren Drugs Money. If

0:38:25.000 --> 0:38:27.360
<v Speaker 1>you like us your rate review and subscribe wherever you

0:38:27.400 --> 0:38:29.719
<v Speaker 1>listen to your podcast. Also keep sending your questions or

0:38:29.719 --> 0:38:31.920
<v Speaker 1>comments to marrin Money at bloombag dot next. You can

0:38:31.960 --> 0:38:34.399
<v Speaker 1>also follow me and John on Twitter or x I

0:38:34.440 --> 0:38:38.080
<v Speaker 1>am at marins w and John is John Underscore strap Back.

0:38:38.440 --> 0:38:41.120
<v Speaker 1>This episode was hosted by Me Maren Sunset Web. It

0:38:41.200 --> 0:38:44.000
<v Speaker 1>was produced by Sammisadi and Moses and time designed by

0:38:44.040 --> 0:38:46.959
<v Speaker 1>Blake Maples and Aaron Kasper. A special thanks, of course

0:38:47.000 --> 0:38:47.839
<v Speaker 1>to Fia me Yang