WEBVTT - "Little Fires Everywhere"

0:00:03.840 --> 0:00:07.000
<v Speaker 1>Welcome to Bloomberg Opinion. I'm Vanny Quinn. This week, the

0:00:07.160 --> 0:00:11.080
<v Speaker 1>younger forces in Taiwan, the sub forty generation, they are very,

0:00:11.200 --> 0:00:13.399
<v Speaker 1>very willing to take out bounds. They really want to.

0:00:13.480 --> 0:00:16.520
<v Speaker 1>They gunn into Tim Culpan on whether Taiwan would be

0:00:16.520 --> 0:00:20.599
<v Speaker 1>willing and able to defend itself should it be necessary. Later,

0:00:20.640 --> 0:00:23.880
<v Speaker 1>we'll speak with Admiral James Defrida's former Suprema Line commander

0:00:23.880 --> 0:00:28.000
<v Speaker 1>of NATO on NATO expansion. First, though, the strengthening dollar

0:00:28.640 --> 0:00:31.600
<v Speaker 1>raises the specter of what I call little fires everywhere,

0:00:32.400 --> 0:00:34.960
<v Speaker 1>because if you're in a developing country right now, the

0:00:35.080 --> 0:00:39.000
<v Speaker 1>last thing you need is disorderly depreciation of your currencs

0:00:39.000 --> 0:00:41.480
<v Speaker 1>against the dollar at the time when energy prices are higher,

0:00:41.960 --> 0:00:44.919
<v Speaker 1>food prices are higher, and the global economy slowing down.

0:00:45.080 --> 0:00:47.920
<v Speaker 1>That's muhammadl Arian on the dangerous ripple effects of a

0:00:48.000 --> 0:00:51.919
<v Speaker 1>strengthening US dollar. I spoke with Marcus Ashworth. Marcus, we're

0:00:51.920 --> 0:00:53.880
<v Speaker 1>seeing a little bit of a pause now, but since

0:00:53.920 --> 0:00:55.880
<v Speaker 1>the start of the year, the broad dollar index has

0:00:55.920 --> 0:01:01.000
<v Speaker 1>appreciated around seven year over year. We heard the mohammadel

0:01:01.120 --> 0:01:05.720
<v Speaker 1>Arean bytes. Are we looking at bigger fragilities to come well?

0:01:05.760 --> 0:01:09.680
<v Speaker 1>It's unusual to see emerging markets joined by a lot

0:01:09.720 --> 0:01:13.440
<v Speaker 1>of the very large developed markets in all at the

0:01:13.480 --> 0:01:18.800
<v Speaker 1>same time facing a very unpleasant circumstances with very weak currencies,

0:01:19.880 --> 0:01:23.399
<v Speaker 1>accelerating the need to have to raise interest rates not

0:01:23.480 --> 0:01:28.360
<v Speaker 1>only to combat inflation but support their currencies because unfortunately

0:01:28.400 --> 0:01:32.440
<v Speaker 1>this time around, because it's all important energy inflation, they

0:01:32.440 --> 0:01:35.040
<v Speaker 1>really don't want to weak currency, even if they're export

0:01:35.160 --> 0:01:38.760
<v Speaker 1>lead like say Japan or the Union, are this compounds

0:01:38.760 --> 0:01:41.360
<v Speaker 1>itself or weaker currency. So it's all about the strong

0:01:41.400 --> 0:01:45.280
<v Speaker 1>dollar because the feathers raising rates so much more aggressively,

0:01:45.600 --> 0:01:47.960
<v Speaker 1>um and that then there's the added value of that

0:01:48.360 --> 0:01:53.360
<v Speaker 1>reserve haven currency or the dollar. So all the sort

0:01:53.400 --> 0:01:57.880
<v Speaker 1>of everything that wants a perfect storm, except perhaps we

0:01:58.000 --> 0:02:01.680
<v Speaker 1>see the dollar having a bit of a ead at last. Well,

0:02:01.720 --> 0:02:04.320
<v Speaker 1>where should we look for for agilities, because right now

0:02:04.360 --> 0:02:07.880
<v Speaker 1>it seems like there is social geopolitical instability in so

0:02:07.880 --> 0:02:10.800
<v Speaker 1>many places. I'm thinking of places like Sri Lanka, Pakistan,

0:02:10.880 --> 0:02:13.160
<v Speaker 1>but obviously other places around the world as well, even

0:02:13.320 --> 0:02:19.720
<v Speaker 1>China thinking w about So yes, there is a lot

0:02:19.760 --> 0:02:22.399
<v Speaker 1>of other problems around the world, and I certainly think

0:02:22.400 --> 0:02:25.680
<v Speaker 1>that encourages people to rush into dollars, particularly now they

0:02:25.680 --> 0:02:28.200
<v Speaker 1>can get to yield as the bond markets have verted

0:02:28.240 --> 0:02:31.400
<v Speaker 1>clearly with their feet. We have yet to see a

0:02:31.400 --> 0:02:35.120
<v Speaker 1>food crisis, but it's clearly coming, which will put a

0:02:35.120 --> 0:02:38.519
<v Speaker 1>lot of pressures, particularly on place like Egypt and North Africa,

0:02:38.840 --> 0:02:41.120
<v Speaker 1>but it will spill over into a lot of other

0:02:41.160 --> 0:02:44.840
<v Speaker 1>emerging markets. We're seeing clearly Turkey under pressure again the

0:02:44.919 --> 0:02:48.280
<v Speaker 1>last few days. They're all bubbling away, and the stresses

0:02:48.320 --> 0:02:50.959
<v Speaker 1>and strength of the system are xacci betted by the

0:02:50.960 --> 0:02:54.000
<v Speaker 1>strength of dollar, and buttons are starting to PLoP off

0:02:54.120 --> 0:02:58.280
<v Speaker 1>the super aggressive bed also with drawing liquidity. And the

0:02:58.320 --> 0:03:00.880
<v Speaker 1>one thing which has kept the world vibe through the

0:03:00.880 --> 0:03:05.720
<v Speaker 1>pandemic and gross crisis is equality of super amounts of dollars, right,

0:03:05.760 --> 0:03:08.680
<v Speaker 1>And how much of the responsibility is on the FED,

0:03:08.760 --> 0:03:11.320
<v Speaker 1>because obviously it has to look after its own economy,

0:03:11.440 --> 0:03:14.440
<v Speaker 1>and there's huge inflation relative to what we're used to

0:03:14.560 --> 0:03:16.200
<v Speaker 1>here in the United States, so the FED has to

0:03:16.240 --> 0:03:18.560
<v Speaker 1>worry about that. But at the same time, Jenny Yellen

0:03:18.639 --> 0:03:20.560
<v Speaker 1>used to always talk about feedback loops, so if there

0:03:20.560 --> 0:03:22.920
<v Speaker 1>are problems in other countries in the world, that's going

0:03:22.960 --> 0:03:25.600
<v Speaker 1>to eventually feed back to the United States as well. Yeah,

0:03:25.720 --> 0:03:28.160
<v Speaker 1>it's just going to be a second order effect, or

0:03:28.160 --> 0:03:31.280
<v Speaker 1>possibly more than that, until the US economy starts to

0:03:31.360 --> 0:03:36.000
<v Speaker 1>feel weakness because it's exports falling away or there is

0:03:36.040 --> 0:03:39.560
<v Speaker 1>a complete drop off demand. Only then will we see

0:03:39.800 --> 0:03:42.040
<v Speaker 1>perhaps be used as a bit of an excuse per Fed.

0:03:42.720 --> 0:03:44.560
<v Speaker 1>At the moment, that seems to be very little pressure

0:03:44.560 --> 0:03:47.320
<v Speaker 1>on them internally. To think of the rest of the world,

0:03:47.560 --> 0:03:50.840
<v Speaker 1>I do think that having Yellen and the Treasury is important.

0:03:51.000 --> 0:03:53.400
<v Speaker 1>Perhaps you could argue it's too close for comfort since

0:03:53.440 --> 0:03:56.400
<v Speaker 1>she's just stepped away from the FED, but equally it

0:03:56.480 --> 0:03:59.480
<v Speaker 1>can be very useful because she knows everyone. They all

0:03:59.480 --> 0:04:01.080
<v Speaker 1>talked to each other. There's no doubt about it. In

0:04:01.160 --> 0:04:03.120
<v Speaker 1>the Bank, I think that takes a very careful look

0:04:03.120 --> 0:04:05.720
<v Speaker 1>at what the said, doesn't likewise your insential bank on

0:04:05.760 --> 0:04:08.040
<v Speaker 1>the back of Japan. So I'm sure they'll they'll be

0:04:08.040 --> 0:04:11.360
<v Speaker 1>getting the incoming please stop the hiking rates so quickly.

0:04:11.440 --> 0:04:14.120
<v Speaker 1>But whether they listen or not, as you quite rightly summarized,

0:04:14.160 --> 0:04:16.920
<v Speaker 1>I don't think they can't then, yeah, exactly, And then

0:04:16.960 --> 0:04:18.719
<v Speaker 1>can we count on the rest of the world to

0:04:19.080 --> 0:04:22.440
<v Speaker 1>progress with things like structural reforms that might actually help

0:04:22.480 --> 0:04:24.599
<v Speaker 1>their economies. That's gonna be difficult for them too if

0:04:24.600 --> 0:04:27.800
<v Speaker 1>they can't even service their external debt, right. I think

0:04:27.800 --> 0:04:30.600
<v Speaker 1>that's which we're thinking on lots of different ways. I mean, yes,

0:04:30.800 --> 0:04:33.360
<v Speaker 1>someone that will have to not necessarily the time frame

0:04:33.440 --> 0:04:35.080
<v Speaker 1>they want to do it in, but some of them

0:04:35.080 --> 0:04:37.640
<v Speaker 1>will absolutely have to do some more aggressive and they

0:04:37.640 --> 0:04:39.719
<v Speaker 1>already are to be fair, but it's a dilever for

0:04:39.839 --> 0:04:42.680
<v Speaker 1>everyone to be able to try and keep inflation down

0:04:42.800 --> 0:04:47.040
<v Speaker 1>and avoid recession. Marcus, you sound a little less worried

0:04:47.080 --> 0:04:49.720
<v Speaker 1>than somebody like muhammadel Arian. I don't want to over

0:04:49.839 --> 0:04:52.720
<v Speaker 1>characterize what he's doing, but is he maybe exaggerating a

0:04:52.760 --> 0:04:56.720
<v Speaker 1>little bit? Yes, I think there's a problem in the world,

0:04:56.760 --> 0:05:00.240
<v Speaker 1>and I'm not sure they're going to get any any times.

0:05:00.240 --> 0:05:02.720
<v Speaker 1>Seeing but there are certain things which you know, if

0:05:02.720 --> 0:05:05.240
<v Speaker 1>you look at the underlying strength of the labor market

0:05:05.320 --> 0:05:08.480
<v Speaker 1>and economies in Europe, US and the UK in particular,

0:05:08.640 --> 0:05:11.760
<v Speaker 1>they're pretty strong. China is able to do an awful

0:05:11.800 --> 0:05:15.239
<v Speaker 1>lot of things which other economies can't presount so much control.

0:05:15.880 --> 0:05:18.120
<v Speaker 1>You know that the world is going to suffer a

0:05:18.120 --> 0:05:21.840
<v Speaker 1>correction because it's over stimulated. Left that stimus in too long,

0:05:22.480 --> 0:05:25.120
<v Speaker 1>and it's got a horrible hangover. Should we call a

0:05:25.120 --> 0:05:28.120
<v Speaker 1>combinems and logistic situations chuck in a war? But we

0:05:28.160 --> 0:05:30.000
<v Speaker 1>will get through this, and I do think the dollar

0:05:30.040 --> 0:05:33.640
<v Speaker 1>strength is overdone and it will probably carry on a

0:05:33.640 --> 0:05:35.640
<v Speaker 1>bit longer. But you know, the point is there for

0:05:35.640 --> 0:05:37.440
<v Speaker 1>a reason, and until the world gets a better place,

0:05:37.480 --> 0:05:39.400
<v Speaker 1>that is going to stay in the place. Today, the

0:05:39.400 --> 0:05:42.159
<v Speaker 1>Treasury is now talking a lot about friends shorings or

0:05:42.160 --> 0:05:45.720
<v Speaker 1>confining global supply chains to friendly networks. Don't quite know

0:05:45.839 --> 0:05:48.800
<v Speaker 1>who these friends are yet, but it must be pretty

0:05:48.839 --> 0:05:52.240
<v Speaker 1>difficult for partners or people who thought they were partners

0:05:52.279 --> 0:05:55.400
<v Speaker 1>to hear this. Many of them are not democracies. Are

0:05:55.520 --> 0:05:58.560
<v Speaker 1>we headed towards a system where many other countries are

0:05:58.640 --> 0:06:01.080
<v Speaker 1>locked out of the US and dollar system and don't

0:06:01.080 --> 0:06:04.520
<v Speaker 1>have enough reserves to pay for what they need to import. Well,

0:06:04.680 --> 0:06:06.880
<v Speaker 1>we know whose friends are because they're the ones who've

0:06:06.880 --> 0:06:09.719
<v Speaker 1>got currency swaps through the pandemic and before that, the

0:06:09.760 --> 0:06:12.840
<v Speaker 1>global financial crisis. Yes, it is a weapon. Do they

0:06:12.920 --> 0:06:16.960
<v Speaker 1>use it cleverly? Absolutely? Do I applaud what they're doing, Yes?

0:06:17.000 --> 0:06:20.120
<v Speaker 1>I do. Actually, I think this is the leverage they have,

0:06:20.360 --> 0:06:24.120
<v Speaker 1>and if you're without the dollar system, then that's a

0:06:24.240 --> 0:06:27.359
<v Speaker 1>conscious decision, And as far as I can say that,

0:06:27.400 --> 0:06:31.520
<v Speaker 1>the Treasury and the particularly oh fact of handling things

0:06:31.560 --> 0:06:34.520
<v Speaker 1>in a very smart way, and they are understanding what

0:06:34.560 --> 0:06:38.920
<v Speaker 1>they're doing with Russia. They're not being completely blanketly banning everything.

0:06:38.960 --> 0:06:41.680
<v Speaker 1>They've done it in a very superstated and clever way.

0:06:41.800 --> 0:06:45.360
<v Speaker 1>I think it's so wonderful forul Marcus Ashworth. Are you

0:06:45.400 --> 0:06:48.719
<v Speaker 1>willing to get involved militarily to defend Taiwan if it

0:06:48.760 --> 0:06:54.320
<v Speaker 1>comes to that, you are? That's the commendment we made

0:06:54.600 --> 0:06:57.720
<v Speaker 1>President Biden this week. Well, gaff or no gaff. Taiwan's

0:06:57.720 --> 0:07:00.839
<v Speaker 1>democracy is facing a hostile chai now and a policy

0:07:00.839 --> 0:07:04.960
<v Speaker 1>of strategic ambiguity on whether US forces would defend Taiwan

0:07:05.000 --> 0:07:07.920
<v Speaker 1>against China in the event of an invasion. Tim Coultan

0:07:08.000 --> 0:07:10.760
<v Speaker 1>lives in Taipei. I asked him how Russia's invasion of

0:07:10.840 --> 0:07:14.360
<v Speaker 1>Ukraine and the subsequent global response might have changed China's

0:07:14.360 --> 0:07:17.440
<v Speaker 1>calculus on Taiwan, if at all. Yeah, this saber rattling

0:07:17.480 --> 0:07:20.000
<v Speaker 1>has been going on for twenty years. I've lived in

0:07:20.040 --> 0:07:23.640
<v Speaker 1>Taiwan half my life. It's something that's always been persistent.

0:07:23.720 --> 0:07:27.600
<v Speaker 1>It's had peaks and troughs. Back in the early two thousands,

0:07:27.640 --> 0:07:30.440
<v Speaker 1>when a more pro Taiwan independence president came in, and

0:07:30.480 --> 0:07:32.480
<v Speaker 1>he was in eight years, there's definitely a lot more

0:07:32.520 --> 0:07:34.800
<v Speaker 1>of it. Then we had a president for eight years

0:07:34.800 --> 0:07:37.160
<v Speaker 1>who was a bit more sympathetic to Beijing, and so

0:07:37.280 --> 0:07:40.320
<v Speaker 1>things died down. Now we have a president again who's

0:07:40.400 --> 0:07:43.720
<v Speaker 1>much more kind of democratically focused, leans towards the taiwan

0:07:44.440 --> 0:07:47.880
<v Speaker 1>centric view of Taiwan. So again it raises again. But

0:07:47.960 --> 0:07:52.640
<v Speaker 1>we also have a much more confident China, especially under

0:07:52.640 --> 0:07:55.240
<v Speaker 1>Shi Jimping, who's really pushing the genera a lot more.

0:07:56.000 --> 0:07:59.680
<v Speaker 1>So we now see this push towards basically making the

0:07:59.680 --> 0:08:04.880
<v Speaker 1>world understand Beijing's view of Taiwan and the China Taiwan relationship.

0:08:05.680 --> 0:08:09.040
<v Speaker 1>And I think the thing that I believe a lot

0:08:09.080 --> 0:08:12.640
<v Speaker 1>of people might be mistaking is that there is heightened

0:08:12.800 --> 0:08:19.440
<v Speaker 1>tension versus a higher cadence of statements from Beijing. So

0:08:20.360 --> 0:08:23.880
<v Speaker 1>Beijing will take pretty much any opportunity to press its

0:08:23.920 --> 0:08:27.520
<v Speaker 1>point on Taiwan, that being that Taiwan is an inalienable

0:08:27.600 --> 0:08:31.880
<v Speaker 1>part of China. Um you know, factually speaking, whether or

0:08:31.920 --> 0:08:34.320
<v Speaker 1>not you believe that you know, the PRC under the

0:08:34.320 --> 0:08:37.599
<v Speaker 1>c SP has never actually ruled Taiwan and the r

0:08:37.640 --> 0:08:39.960
<v Speaker 1>o C, which was kind of defeated and kicked out

0:08:39.960 --> 0:08:44.920
<v Speaker 1>of mainland China now sits in Taiwan. But there's definitely

0:08:44.920 --> 0:08:47.680
<v Speaker 1>that viewpoint from Beijing that Taiwan should be part of

0:08:47.679 --> 0:08:50.920
<v Speaker 1>the PRC, and of course in Taiwan the view is

0:08:51.040 --> 0:08:54.280
<v Speaker 1>very much the opposite. But what we're really seeing in

0:08:54.280 --> 0:08:57.440
<v Speaker 1>the last few years is weekly press conferences from the

0:08:57.480 --> 0:09:00.920
<v Speaker 1>Foreign Ministry, and China also has a Taiwan Affairs Office

0:09:00.960 --> 0:09:04.720
<v Speaker 1>which deals specifically with Taiwan issues. They will always keep

0:09:04.720 --> 0:09:08.840
<v Speaker 1>pressing the point, and then of course whenever US officials

0:09:08.920 --> 0:09:11.880
<v Speaker 1>talked to Chinese officials, they'll keep reminding them, hey, you know,

0:09:11.960 --> 0:09:15.800
<v Speaker 1>don't make the mistake of supporting Taiwan independence. You know,

0:09:15.920 --> 0:09:18.760
<v Speaker 1>you need to be reminded that Taiwan is ours. You'd

0:09:18.760 --> 0:09:24.240
<v Speaker 1>be making a grave mistake helping Taiwan independence forces. So

0:09:24.320 --> 0:09:28.280
<v Speaker 1>there's definitely an increase intention, But I think the thing

0:09:28.320 --> 0:09:30.480
<v Speaker 1>that we're seeing a lot is also just an increase

0:09:30.520 --> 0:09:33.640
<v Speaker 1>in the cadence at which Beijing will remind the world

0:09:33.880 --> 0:09:36.840
<v Speaker 1>of its world view and its view on Taiwan. And

0:09:36.960 --> 0:09:40.600
<v Speaker 1>it's important not to conflate the two, although both definitely exist.

0:09:40.720 --> 0:09:44.640
<v Speaker 1>Will China actually do anything concrete about making what it

0:09:44.679 --> 0:09:48.240
<v Speaker 1>perceives as its ownership of Taiwan anymore practical. Will the

0:09:48.280 --> 0:09:52.680
<v Speaker 1>taiwan his army have to defend Taiwan's democracy? That is

0:09:53.320 --> 0:09:55.800
<v Speaker 1>such a difficult question. You've got the CIA trying to

0:09:55.800 --> 0:10:01.880
<v Speaker 1>work that at. You've got US, uh UK, Australian, Japanese

0:10:02.320 --> 0:10:05.880
<v Speaker 1>intelligence agencies and defense horses trying to work that out.

0:10:06.000 --> 0:10:09.079
<v Speaker 1>I don't think so. Um, you know, I might be wrong.

0:10:09.240 --> 0:10:11.319
<v Speaker 1>I hope, I hope I'm not wrong. I don't think

0:10:11.360 --> 0:10:14.240
<v Speaker 1>that we will see China try to invade Taiwan. I

0:10:14.280 --> 0:10:18.079
<v Speaker 1>think the most likely scenario might be maybe more akin

0:10:18.120 --> 0:10:20.760
<v Speaker 1>to what Russia did with parts of Ukraine, such as

0:10:20.840 --> 0:10:24.400
<v Speaker 1>Crimera or even Dombus regions. They might try to take

0:10:24.440 --> 0:10:26.880
<v Speaker 1>an outlying island. Taiwan is not just one island. There's

0:10:26.960 --> 0:10:29.480
<v Speaker 1>multiple islands. There's the main island of Taiwan, but there's

0:10:29.520 --> 0:10:32.480
<v Speaker 1>some outlying islands Pungu, which is kind of close to Taiwan.

0:10:32.800 --> 0:10:35.200
<v Speaker 1>There's another island of Ginman, which is very very close

0:10:35.240 --> 0:10:37.560
<v Speaker 1>to China's like one mile off the coast of China.

0:10:38.040 --> 0:10:41.480
<v Speaker 1>There's a couple of smaller islands. There's also some basically

0:10:41.520 --> 0:10:45.080
<v Speaker 1>deserted islands which a couple of countries are claimed Japan

0:10:45.920 --> 0:10:49.040
<v Speaker 1>and Taiwan and China and a few others claim a

0:10:49.120 --> 0:10:51.320
<v Speaker 1>set of islands kind of in the South China Sea.

0:10:51.880 --> 0:10:54.600
<v Speaker 1>It wouldn't be surprising if China tries to take one

0:10:54.600 --> 0:10:57.360
<v Speaker 1>of those islands just to kind of show that they can,

0:10:58.400 --> 0:11:01.640
<v Speaker 1>and that might be an to kind of rattle the

0:11:01.760 --> 0:11:05.000
<v Speaker 1>cage of the Americans and the Japanese and other allies

0:11:05.040 --> 0:11:07.840
<v Speaker 1>and like minded nations of Taiwan. But a full on

0:11:07.880 --> 0:11:13.240
<v Speaker 1>invasion of Taiwan, I think is unlikely. But we shouldn't

0:11:13.240 --> 0:11:17.240
<v Speaker 1>necessarily think of Beijing's leadership is acting rationally anymore than

0:11:17.280 --> 0:11:21.120
<v Speaker 1>we think of Vladimir Putin as acting rationally in trying

0:11:21.160 --> 0:11:25.559
<v Speaker 1>to take Ukraine. Rationalism doesn't play into it. It's more nationalism.

0:11:25.640 --> 0:11:27.640
<v Speaker 1>And there's the question of capabilities as well. I mean,

0:11:27.679 --> 0:11:30.360
<v Speaker 1>it would have to be a sea war. Taiwan has

0:11:30.400 --> 0:11:33.160
<v Speaker 1>an army, but how prepared is it. What kind of

0:11:33.160 --> 0:11:36.320
<v Speaker 1>tactics have they been learning? Is there the willingness in

0:11:36.400 --> 0:11:39.920
<v Speaker 1>Taiwan among the electorate to have Taiwan go to war

0:11:39.960 --> 0:11:42.440
<v Speaker 1>with China if it came to that. Yeah, So I

0:11:42.480 --> 0:11:44.920
<v Speaker 1>think one of the most important things that I think

0:11:45.040 --> 0:11:47.280
<v Speaker 1>the world needs to understand is Taiwan doesn't want a war.

0:11:47.800 --> 0:11:51.360
<v Speaker 1>Taiwan has not been bracing for war or preparing for war.

0:11:51.640 --> 0:11:54.480
<v Speaker 1>It is the case that China has over a thousand

0:11:54.480 --> 0:11:57.960
<v Speaker 1>missiles pointed at Taiwan. Taiwan does not have the reverse,

0:11:58.360 --> 0:12:02.120
<v Speaker 1>So it would be Taiwan is the fender as Ukraine

0:12:02.160 --> 0:12:06.120
<v Speaker 1>is the defender against Russia. There is a lot of debate,

0:12:06.240 --> 0:12:08.800
<v Speaker 1>both within Taiwan and globally about whether or not Taiwan

0:12:08.840 --> 0:12:11.080
<v Speaker 1>is doing enough, whether or not they take it seriously enough.

0:12:11.120 --> 0:12:15.360
<v Speaker 1>I think Ukraine definitely solidifies in Taiwanese people's minds that

0:12:15.440 --> 0:12:18.400
<v Speaker 1>it is a real possibility. There is much stronger moves

0:12:18.440 --> 0:12:22.959
<v Speaker 1>towards civil defense now. Washington, including Pentagon, State and White

0:12:23.000 --> 0:12:25.920
<v Speaker 1>House have criticized Taiwan for not taking it seriously enough,

0:12:26.000 --> 0:12:28.160
<v Speaker 1>for not spending enough money, for not spending the right

0:12:28.240 --> 0:12:31.320
<v Speaker 1>kind of money, and that is a valid criticism. I

0:12:31.360 --> 0:12:34.439
<v Speaker 1>think it could definitely be said that Taiwan has probably

0:12:34.480 --> 0:12:38.000
<v Speaker 1>not been doing enough. But there is a problem within Taiwan.

0:12:38.080 --> 0:12:40.480
<v Speaker 1>It's a domestic political problem, and that is that the

0:12:40.559 --> 0:12:43.760
<v Speaker 1>older generations in Taiwan, who think of themselves as more

0:12:43.920 --> 0:12:50.319
<v Speaker 1>Chinese are really not as keen to defend a independent

0:12:50.400 --> 0:12:53.760
<v Speaker 1>Taiwan as they might be seen as defending the Republic

0:12:53.840 --> 0:12:56.720
<v Speaker 1>of China, which you know, technically is the name of Taiwan.

0:12:57.200 --> 0:12:59.960
<v Speaker 1>The younger forces in Taiwan, the younger electorate at the

0:13:00.080 --> 0:13:04.840
<v Speaker 1>sub forty generation, and even the sub thirty generation, including

0:13:04.960 --> 0:13:07.960
<v Speaker 1>a group of people like call the Sunflower generation because

0:13:08.200 --> 0:13:12.640
<v Speaker 1>they helped defend Taiwan's democracy by storming the legislature many

0:13:12.720 --> 0:13:15.600
<v Speaker 1>years ago. They are very very willing to take up arms.

0:13:15.600 --> 0:13:17.760
<v Speaker 1>They they really want to. They're gunning too. I have

0:13:17.840 --> 0:13:21.280
<v Speaker 1>people come to me constantly messaging me and talking and saying, hey,

0:13:21.640 --> 0:13:23.360
<v Speaker 1>we want to learn how to use weapons. We want

0:13:23.360 --> 0:13:25.600
<v Speaker 1>to go into the jungle and learn how to fire

0:13:25.720 --> 0:13:28.839
<v Speaker 1>rifles and learn combat training and stuff like that. They're

0:13:29.040 --> 0:13:31.640
<v Speaker 1>really really looking at Ukraine and going we want to

0:13:31.640 --> 0:13:33.800
<v Speaker 1>be like that. We really respect what Ukraine is doing

0:13:33.840 --> 0:13:35.480
<v Speaker 1>and we want to learn that. But that is the

0:13:35.559 --> 0:13:40.160
<v Speaker 1>under forty generation. The over forty generation is probably less

0:13:40.240 --> 0:13:44.000
<v Speaker 1>keen to take up arms, and so Taiwan, I think,

0:13:44.080 --> 0:13:46.680
<v Speaker 1>is a little bit of a divided country in that respect.

0:13:46.720 --> 0:13:49.040
<v Speaker 1>And I think what we'll see going forward is that

0:13:49.120 --> 0:13:52.680
<v Speaker 1>time is not on Beijing side in terms of the

0:13:52.720 --> 0:13:56.640
<v Speaker 1>Taiwanese people seeing their self identity and willing to learn

0:13:56.800 --> 0:13:59.880
<v Speaker 1>civil defense and taking up their own arms and defending

0:13:59.880 --> 0:14:03.400
<v Speaker 1>a against any possible invasion. Tim Coulpan, There, don't forget

0:14:03.400 --> 0:14:05.959
<v Speaker 1>to get in touch. All thoughts and opinions very welcome.

0:14:06.000 --> 0:14:08.720
<v Speaker 1>I'm at Vanney Quinn on Twitter or email v Quinn

0:14:08.720 --> 0:14:11.840
<v Speaker 1>at Bloomberg dot net and Bloomberg Opinion is also available

0:14:11.840 --> 0:14:14.719
<v Speaker 1>as a podcast on Apple, Spotify and wherever you get

0:14:14.760 --> 0:14:18.200
<v Speaker 1>your podcasts. Admiral James de Vitas is a former Supreme

0:14:18.240 --> 0:14:21.840
<v Speaker 1>Ally Commander of NATO's Ally Command operations. His new book

0:14:21.880 --> 0:14:24.720
<v Speaker 1>has just hit bookstores. It's called To Risk at All,

0:14:24.960 --> 0:14:28.160
<v Speaker 1>Nine Conflicts and the Crucible of Decision. In it, he

0:14:28.200 --> 0:14:31.840
<v Speaker 1>analyzes how to make good decisions in moments of intense crisis.

0:14:32.520 --> 0:14:34.920
<v Speaker 1>Admiral Stavidas, I want to talk about NATO expansion and

0:14:34.960 --> 0:14:37.720
<v Speaker 1>the war in Ukraine, obviously, but first the book I

0:14:37.760 --> 0:14:40.480
<v Speaker 1>have to ask why nine Decisions? Is it a reference

0:14:40.480 --> 0:14:44.080
<v Speaker 1>to Dante and his nine Circles of hell Um? You

0:14:44.120 --> 0:14:46.680
<v Speaker 1>know that was very much in my mind and the

0:14:46.880 --> 0:14:49.960
<v Speaker 1>idea that we have found ourselves, I think in this

0:14:50.120 --> 0:14:54.360
<v Speaker 1>kind of dark forest as Dante did before he was escorted,

0:14:54.440 --> 0:14:56.960
<v Speaker 1>if you will, into the inferno. But we have to

0:14:57.000 --> 0:15:03.120
<v Speaker 1>remember the optivism of of Ganti's uh divine comedy, which

0:15:03.160 --> 0:15:07.240
<v Speaker 1>is that eventually we escaped the inferno, we get to purgatory,

0:15:07.320 --> 0:15:11.480
<v Speaker 1>and we get to Paradis. It's an extra ordinarily optimistic

0:15:11.760 --> 0:15:14.920
<v Speaker 1>framework for somebody who's been through so much. Explained to

0:15:15.000 --> 0:15:20.240
<v Speaker 1>us how you picked these nine particular bottle decisions. Well,

0:15:20.280 --> 0:15:22.640
<v Speaker 1>first and foremost, of course, I'm a sailor, I'm a

0:15:22.760 --> 0:15:25.720
<v Speaker 1>naval officer, and so you know right about what you

0:15:25.760 --> 0:15:30.080
<v Speaker 1>actually know about. So I picked nine different sailors from history,

0:15:30.120 --> 0:15:33.680
<v Speaker 1>and Bonnie, you'll know also that another subtle reference here

0:15:33.720 --> 0:15:37.560
<v Speaker 1>is the Cato nine Gales, which is applied to sailors

0:15:37.600 --> 0:15:41.720
<v Speaker 1>when they have misbehaved. And so um in the course

0:15:41.720 --> 0:15:44.360
<v Speaker 1>of these nine decisions, to see some that come out

0:15:44.520 --> 0:15:47.280
<v Speaker 1>very well and some that come out very badly. M

0:15:47.400 --> 0:15:49.720
<v Speaker 1>it would have been easy to pick, you know, nine

0:15:49.800 --> 0:15:54.600
<v Speaker 1>spectacular decisions. I think more realistically, you want a book

0:15:54.760 --> 0:15:58.440
<v Speaker 1>that helps a reader understand what are the tools that

0:15:58.600 --> 0:16:02.640
<v Speaker 1>you're she needs to make decisions under extreme pressure using

0:16:02.640 --> 0:16:06.000
<v Speaker 1>the examples in the book. One of the conclusions that's

0:16:06.040 --> 0:16:10.080
<v Speaker 1>applicable to everyday civilian life, and in fact is probably

0:16:10.200 --> 0:16:14.000
<v Speaker 1>the conclusion. It's the only thing that matters is to

0:16:14.160 --> 0:16:16.600
<v Speaker 1>slow time down when you're in a moment like that.

0:16:17.200 --> 0:16:18.960
<v Speaker 1>How do you get to that spot where you can

0:16:19.000 --> 0:16:25.000
<v Speaker 1>do that? You first and foremost, you you study others,

0:16:25.080 --> 0:16:28.920
<v Speaker 1>You look at history, You try and understand how people

0:16:29.120 --> 0:16:34.440
<v Speaker 1>can make those decisions. Number Two, you practice, and what

0:16:34.480 --> 0:16:38.920
<v Speaker 1>I mean by that is deliberately place yourself mentally in

0:16:38.960 --> 0:16:42.400
<v Speaker 1>a situation of extreme crisis and walk your way through it.

0:16:42.880 --> 0:16:46.080
<v Speaker 1>And that is the kind of training that Navy seals

0:16:46.160 --> 0:16:48.560
<v Speaker 1>do all the time before they go off. And the

0:16:48.640 --> 0:16:53.880
<v Speaker 1>more you practice, the more you consciously think about what

0:16:54.000 --> 0:16:56.280
<v Speaker 1>it would be like to be in that moment of crisis,

0:16:56.960 --> 0:16:59.480
<v Speaker 1>the more prepared you'll be when that when that moment

0:16:59.520 --> 0:17:03.440
<v Speaker 1>does come. Admiral watching Russia's war in Ukraine over the

0:17:03.520 --> 0:17:06.080
<v Speaker 1>last three months now, and you know it's obviously going

0:17:06.119 --> 0:17:08.960
<v Speaker 1>to go on for longer. What are the decisions that

0:17:09.040 --> 0:17:12.000
<v Speaker 1>you have noticed that possibly the rest of us haven't seen.

0:17:12.680 --> 0:17:16.040
<v Speaker 1>The small decisions, the medium decisions, the large decisions that

0:17:16.119 --> 0:17:19.600
<v Speaker 1>have been made by everyday soldiers on the battlefield that

0:17:19.720 --> 0:17:24.560
<v Speaker 1>you think are extraordinary. I'm going to start on the

0:17:24.680 --> 0:17:27.800
<v Speaker 1>Russian side of the coin Banni and say that here

0:17:27.840 --> 0:17:34.119
<v Speaker 1>we've seen terrible decisions, decisions that have led to war crimes.

0:17:34.280 --> 0:17:37.320
<v Speaker 1>And I think that's really what's most striking to me

0:17:38.400 --> 0:17:42.520
<v Speaker 1>is how the Russian mid grade officers, their generals all

0:17:42.560 --> 0:17:46.520
<v Speaker 1>the way up to Vladimir Prutin, have allowed their troops

0:17:46.640 --> 0:17:53.080
<v Speaker 1>to simply indiscriminately attack civilians, to break to loot. Um.

0:17:53.200 --> 0:17:56.639
<v Speaker 1>These are armies you would expect, behaviors you would expect

0:17:56.640 --> 0:17:59.760
<v Speaker 1>from an army in the ninth century. Um. This is

0:18:00.280 --> 0:18:05.120
<v Speaker 1>a series of terrible decisions and there is no excuse

0:18:05.160 --> 0:18:07.760
<v Speaker 1>for it. On the other hand, on the Ukrainian side,

0:18:08.320 --> 0:18:13.919
<v Speaker 1>you see soldiers every game making very brave decisions in

0:18:14.040 --> 0:18:16.199
<v Speaker 1>moments when they, as the title of the book is,

0:18:16.240 --> 0:18:19.120
<v Speaker 1>to risk it all, when they are forced to risk

0:18:19.200 --> 0:18:22.359
<v Speaker 1>it all, they're making the right decisions. Look at those

0:18:22.560 --> 0:18:27.040
<v Speaker 1>Ukrainian marines who held out in the city of Marioko

0:18:27.240 --> 0:18:32.280
<v Speaker 1>for months. Um, in their bravery, their courage, Um, you

0:18:32.320 --> 0:18:36.200
<v Speaker 1>see a mirror image, one mirror dark and the other

0:18:36.320 --> 0:18:40.040
<v Speaker 1>full of light. Admiral, what does it mean for someone

0:18:40.160 --> 0:18:43.240
<v Speaker 1>like you who has been through so much training and

0:18:43.359 --> 0:18:46.560
<v Speaker 1>so much effort, so much practice, so much studying of

0:18:46.680 --> 0:18:51.400
<v Speaker 1>past battles and past wars. To see ports in Ukraine

0:18:51.680 --> 0:18:54.959
<v Speaker 1>and even on the Russian side being completely blockaded and

0:18:55.160 --> 0:18:58.360
<v Speaker 1>essentially becoming useless to the world, I mean that must

0:18:58.359 --> 0:19:00.840
<v Speaker 1>be that must provoke a very emotional reaction, even in

0:19:00.960 --> 0:19:04.959
<v Speaker 1>somebody as trained as you. It does indeed, and Um,

0:19:05.119 --> 0:19:07.960
<v Speaker 1>you know we've faced this in history before. You may

0:19:08.000 --> 0:19:13.360
<v Speaker 1>recall um in the nineteen eighties, Um, both the Iranians

0:19:13.400 --> 0:19:16.440
<v Speaker 1>and at one point the Iraqis, particularly the Iranians, tried

0:19:16.480 --> 0:19:19.880
<v Speaker 1>to close off the Straight of Hormuz from the shipment

0:19:19.920 --> 0:19:23.040
<v Speaker 1>of oil tankers. And what did the West do? We

0:19:23.119 --> 0:19:28.000
<v Speaker 1>started escorting those tankers in and out of the Arabian Gulf.

0:19:28.040 --> 0:19:31.000
<v Speaker 1>I did that as a young officer on board a

0:19:31.000 --> 0:19:35.159
<v Speaker 1>cruiser USS Valley Forge. And so I think it's time

0:19:35.200 --> 0:19:38.880
<v Speaker 1>that the West looks at this again. This is war

0:19:39.040 --> 0:19:43.639
<v Speaker 1>criminal behavior that you can't simply blockade ports. This is

0:19:43.680 --> 0:19:49.199
<v Speaker 1>not appropriate under international law, and it's cutting off desperately

0:19:49.240 --> 0:19:52.720
<v Speaker 1>needed grain supplies that's going to lead to further instability.

0:19:53.000 --> 0:19:57.520
<v Speaker 1>I think it's time to consider humanitarian escorts in and

0:19:57.560 --> 0:20:01.440
<v Speaker 1>out to keep the Ukrainian economy functioning. It Yet, he

0:20:01.560 --> 0:20:05.520
<v Speaker 1>creates grain to the world's market. We're with Admiral and

0:20:05.600 --> 0:20:09.880
<v Speaker 1>James Stavrida's former Supreme Allied Commander of NATO's Allied Command Operations.

0:20:10.160 --> 0:20:13.160
<v Speaker 1>His new book has literally just hit the shelves. It's

0:20:13.160 --> 0:20:16.280
<v Speaker 1>called to Risk at All Nine Conflicts and the Crucible

0:20:16.359 --> 0:20:20.119
<v Speaker 1>of Decision. He analyzes what goes into making great decisions

0:20:20.200 --> 0:20:23.640
<v Speaker 1>and maybe not so good decisions in moments of intense crisis.

0:20:24.080 --> 0:20:26.320
<v Speaker 1>Want to turn our attention now to NATO and the

0:20:26.359 --> 0:20:30.159
<v Speaker 1>question of expansion, Admiral, there is broad and bipartisans support

0:20:30.160 --> 0:20:32.840
<v Speaker 1>in the US for Finland and Sweden joining NATO. Turkey

0:20:32.840 --> 0:20:37.159
<v Speaker 1>obviously blocking it. Does Turkey have good arguments to make? No,

0:20:37.280 --> 0:20:40.480
<v Speaker 1>they don't. And let's start with the qualities of these

0:20:40.480 --> 0:20:44.320
<v Speaker 1>two nations as suite that Finland had commanded their troops

0:20:44.359 --> 0:20:50.159
<v Speaker 1>in combat uh They they deployed alongside NATO troops in Afghanistan,

0:20:50.200 --> 0:20:53.000
<v Speaker 1>They operated in the war over Libya. They were part

0:20:53.000 --> 0:20:55.480
<v Speaker 1>of our efforts, NATO efforts to the Balkans. I know

0:20:56.040 --> 0:20:59.680
<v Speaker 1>the quality of these troops very very well. Um there

0:21:00.040 --> 0:21:06.359
<v Speaker 1>a professional, highly trained and technologically advanced. The Swedish Grippin Fighter,

0:21:06.440 --> 0:21:09.159
<v Speaker 1>for example, is among the very best in the world.

0:21:09.440 --> 0:21:12.280
<v Speaker 1>I guess if you can build a good Valvo sports car,

0:21:12.359 --> 0:21:16.480
<v Speaker 1>you can build a fighter pilot plane as well. So um,

0:21:16.600 --> 0:21:22.000
<v Speaker 1>they bring real military quality. Second, they have a history

0:21:22.080 --> 0:21:26.720
<v Speaker 1>of fierce independence. The Fins of course bought the Soviets

0:21:26.720 --> 0:21:31.440
<v Speaker 1>to a standstill and the Winter War um and then

0:21:31.920 --> 0:21:35.040
<v Speaker 1>that that ethos I think will be a benefit to NATO.

0:21:35.119 --> 0:21:39.000
<v Speaker 1>And third fire Glint Bonnie. Geographically, this gives us a

0:21:39.680 --> 0:21:44.080
<v Speaker 1>northern flank in the Alliance and and more um more

0:21:44.720 --> 0:21:47.720
<v Speaker 1>landscape if you will, in the high north in the Arctic.

0:21:47.800 --> 0:21:51.840
<v Speaker 1>Both Sweden and Finland are Arctic nations, so um there

0:21:51.840 --> 0:21:54.840
<v Speaker 1>are there is every reason to bring them into the Alliance. Turkey,

0:21:54.840 --> 0:21:59.280
<v Speaker 1>on the other hand, has a series of bilateral annoyances

0:21:59.320 --> 0:22:02.240
<v Speaker 1>I would category as the man is between they feel

0:22:02.320 --> 0:22:05.320
<v Speaker 1>themselves in those two nations. It's not appropriate to hold

0:22:05.400 --> 0:22:10.040
<v Speaker 1>up the these applications. I don't think Turkey will continue

0:22:10.080 --> 0:22:12.359
<v Speaker 1>to do so well. It's a pretty bold step on

0:22:12.400 --> 0:22:14.760
<v Speaker 1>the part of both Finland and Sweden to want to

0:22:14.840 --> 0:22:16.520
<v Speaker 1>join NATO in the first place, But it does seem

0:22:16.560 --> 0:22:19.399
<v Speaker 1>like a pretty broad accusation to suggest that those countries

0:22:19.400 --> 0:22:23.400
<v Speaker 1>are places where quote representatives of terrorist organizations are concentrated.

0:22:23.600 --> 0:22:25.600
<v Speaker 1>How strong of an argument at all is this on

0:22:25.640 --> 0:22:28.480
<v Speaker 1>the part of Turkey. I don't see it as a

0:22:28.520 --> 0:22:31.760
<v Speaker 1>strong argument in the least, And and Turkey has deployed

0:22:31.800 --> 0:22:36.800
<v Speaker 1>that argument towards other NATO countries. The Turks off and

0:22:36.880 --> 0:22:40.480
<v Speaker 1>say that one of the leaders of the google and movement,

0:22:40.600 --> 0:22:43.840
<v Speaker 1>he happens to live in Pennsylvania in the United States,

0:22:43.840 --> 0:22:46.280
<v Speaker 1>and they want him extraditeed. But they have not given

0:22:46.400 --> 0:22:51.400
<v Speaker 1>us any reason to extradite him, and neither have given

0:22:51.400 --> 0:22:56.240
<v Speaker 1>the Swede to defend the appropriate documentation that that would

0:22:56.320 --> 0:23:00.280
<v Speaker 1>lead to an extradition. Um, it's more a new ant

0:23:00.320 --> 0:23:03.639
<v Speaker 1>spend anything else. And I think Turkey is is in

0:23:03.680 --> 0:23:06.600
<v Speaker 1>the wrong place on this one. You know, Turkey Admiral

0:23:06.600 --> 0:23:09.159
<v Speaker 1>has suggested that it might consider leaving the Alliance if

0:23:09.200 --> 0:23:13.000
<v Speaker 1>it's forced to accept Sweden and Finland. Would it follow through?

0:23:14.359 --> 0:23:17.400
<v Speaker 1>I highly doubt it. Um. I have spent a lot

0:23:17.440 --> 0:23:19.960
<v Speaker 1>of time in Turkey. My grandparents, by the way, we're

0:23:20.000 --> 0:23:23.320
<v Speaker 1>born in Turkey in uh what is today is Mayor.

0:23:23.359 --> 0:23:26.320
<v Speaker 1>They were born in the city of Smyrna in his Greeks.

0:23:26.320 --> 0:23:28.560
<v Speaker 1>They were invited to leave, shall we say, in the

0:23:28.640 --> 0:23:32.560
<v Speaker 1>nineteen twenties Um, so I know Turkey quite well, UM,

0:23:32.720 --> 0:23:35.520
<v Speaker 1>and I will very quickly say Turkey has been a

0:23:35.600 --> 0:23:38.919
<v Speaker 1>very positive force in the Alliance. They've deployed on every

0:23:39.000 --> 0:23:41.480
<v Speaker 1>mission we've asked them to come on, and they've done

0:23:41.640 --> 0:23:45.639
<v Speaker 1>extremely well militarily. I think they take pride day the

0:23:45.720 --> 0:23:49.840
<v Speaker 1>Turkish nation take pride being part of NATO, and I

0:23:49.880 --> 0:23:52.680
<v Speaker 1>don't think they will simply walk away from the alliance.

0:23:53.440 --> 0:23:56.639
<v Speaker 1>What would NATO b if Turkey one of the founding

0:23:56.640 --> 0:24:01.639
<v Speaker 1>members we should say left, Um. Actually Turkey and Greece

0:24:01.680 --> 0:24:05.000
<v Speaker 1>came in in the first contra traditional members, so they're

0:24:05.040 --> 0:24:10.480
<v Speaker 1>not true founding members. But your points extremely well taken. Um.

0:24:10.520 --> 0:24:13.960
<v Speaker 1>I think the NATO Alliance would continue on and would

0:24:13.960 --> 0:24:16.240
<v Speaker 1>continue to be very strong, but of course it would

0:24:16.240 --> 0:24:19.640
<v Speaker 1>be diminished by the departure of any of the nations.

0:24:19.680 --> 0:24:23.840
<v Speaker 1>Today we'd have thirty nations in NATO, many have joined

0:24:23.880 --> 0:24:28.439
<v Speaker 1>and none have left. Let's hope Turkey does not begin

0:24:28.600 --> 0:24:31.480
<v Speaker 1>that pattern. I think it would be bad for Turkey

0:24:31.520 --> 0:24:33.520
<v Speaker 1>and bad for the alliance. I mean, it's a real

0:24:33.560 --> 0:24:36.359
<v Speaker 1>matrix of relationships. As you said on Turkey's party, it

0:24:36.400 --> 0:24:38.760
<v Speaker 1>does have to navigate some kind of relationship with Russia.

0:24:38.880 --> 0:24:43.560
<v Speaker 1>Still presumably could it safely leave Vladimir Putin's orbits, even

0:24:43.560 --> 0:24:45.760
<v Speaker 1>though Russia is a trading partner in ally and it

0:24:45.840 --> 0:24:49.760
<v Speaker 1>needs Russia for food and energy imports in particular. I

0:24:49.840 --> 0:24:53.120
<v Speaker 1>think they can, and I think they should, and um

0:24:53.160 --> 0:24:57.800
<v Speaker 1>the rest of the Alliance would be very happy to

0:24:57.840 --> 0:25:02.120
<v Speaker 1>be helpful to Turkey in at nexus of relationships. And

0:25:02.480 --> 0:25:05.040
<v Speaker 1>let's say that many nations are going to have to

0:25:05.080 --> 0:25:08.440
<v Speaker 1>make some tough decisions in the days ahead about their

0:25:08.480 --> 0:25:12.920
<v Speaker 1>relationship with Labra Putent's Russia, and I say that specifically

0:25:13.040 --> 0:25:17.800
<v Speaker 1>Vladimir Putin's Russia. The wheel of time will turn, and

0:25:17.920 --> 0:25:21.240
<v Speaker 1>at some point in the future Russia may well be

0:25:21.720 --> 0:25:25.280
<v Speaker 1>welcome back. But for the moment um, we all need

0:25:25.359 --> 0:25:29.800
<v Speaker 1>to adjust our relationships. All close with this. People talk

0:25:29.920 --> 0:25:33.359
<v Speaker 1>these days a lot about the great resignation or the

0:25:33.440 --> 0:25:36.040
<v Speaker 1>next great procession. I think what we're going to see

0:25:36.119 --> 0:25:41.280
<v Speaker 1>Vanni is a great rewiring. You're going to see energy, fuel, food,

0:25:41.400 --> 0:25:45.560
<v Speaker 1>aquarian products. These are going to be rewired away from

0:25:45.640 --> 0:25:49.359
<v Speaker 1>Russia in a way that will diminish them. Ultimately. We're

0:25:49.400 --> 0:25:51.680
<v Speaker 1>getting insighted into details here, but there is a question

0:25:51.720 --> 0:25:54.520
<v Speaker 1>of an arms deal and a refund that Turkey is

0:25:54.560 --> 0:25:56.600
<v Speaker 1>looking for at one point four billion dollars. It was

0:25:56.640 --> 0:25:59.760
<v Speaker 1>a deposit for an F thirty five order. What happens

0:26:00.080 --> 0:26:02.239
<v Speaker 1>that is it fair for the US to hold onto that?

0:26:02.280 --> 0:26:06.480
<v Speaker 1>Does Turkey have a point? I think on that one

0:26:06.520 --> 0:26:10.560
<v Speaker 1>Turkey very much as a point. And again all of

0:26:10.600 --> 0:26:14.080
<v Speaker 1>this fell out of the Turkish decision to purchase the

0:26:14.400 --> 0:26:17.800
<v Speaker 1>S four hundred weapons system, since you said you wanted

0:26:17.840 --> 0:26:22.040
<v Speaker 1>to go into detail a very high end air defense system,

0:26:22.080 --> 0:26:26.000
<v Speaker 1>and that is what led to their expulsion. Not too

0:26:26.040 --> 0:26:29.479
<v Speaker 1>strong a word from the Joint Strike Fighter program um,

0:26:29.640 --> 0:26:33.080
<v Speaker 1>but we need to even as we follow all of

0:26:33.240 --> 0:26:37.119
<v Speaker 1>those political paths, we need to be fair to a

0:26:37.240 --> 0:26:39.960
<v Speaker 1>NATO partner and ally, and I think this is one

0:26:40.000 --> 0:26:43.879
<v Speaker 1>where we can negotiate satisfactorily with Turkey, and I suspect

0:26:43.920 --> 0:26:47.120
<v Speaker 1>the US and Turkey will do so. Real a quick word,

0:26:47.160 --> 0:26:49.359
<v Speaker 1>if I may. On Taiwan, we obviously had the President

0:26:49.400 --> 0:26:52.160
<v Speaker 1>answering a question about defending Taiwan this week that wasn't

0:26:52.160 --> 0:26:56.280
<v Speaker 1>received well in Beijing. With our experience now regarding Ukraine,

0:26:56.440 --> 0:26:59.879
<v Speaker 1>has the tactical thinking on Taiwan changed at all? Is

0:27:00.040 --> 0:27:02.760
<v Speaker 1>offense something that could be done by proxy or its

0:27:02.760 --> 0:27:05.720
<v Speaker 1>sanctions as it has been for the most part with Ukraine.

0:27:07.440 --> 0:27:11.399
<v Speaker 1>I think that that is precisely what the administration is doing,

0:27:11.520 --> 0:27:14.760
<v Speaker 1>and um I don't think it's a gap or a

0:27:14.800 --> 0:27:17.960
<v Speaker 1>coincidence or miss speaking on the part of the President.

0:27:18.440 --> 0:27:22.280
<v Speaker 1>I think that he is signaling that this administration is

0:27:22.320 --> 0:27:27.320
<v Speaker 1>going to lean further forward. That means weapons systems that

0:27:27.400 --> 0:27:31.080
<v Speaker 1>won't be more useful in defense of the island of Taiwan.

0:27:31.520 --> 0:27:36.000
<v Speaker 1>It means more engagement diplomatically with the island of Taiwan.

0:27:36.040 --> 0:27:40.920
<v Speaker 1>It enhancing economic relationships and doing so in a timely

0:27:40.960 --> 0:27:45.000
<v Speaker 1>manner before we land in crisis. So it's not an

0:27:45.040 --> 0:27:49.080
<v Speaker 1>all out, Hey, we're going to defend him as we

0:27:49.080 --> 0:27:52.920
<v Speaker 1>wud a NATO. Ally, that's not what the President is

0:27:52.960 --> 0:27:56.320
<v Speaker 1>trying to signal, But I believe he's signaling a forward

0:27:56.400 --> 0:28:00.359
<v Speaker 1>leaning posture that would prepare and help the taiwan needs

0:28:00.359 --> 0:28:03.560
<v Speaker 1>so that they can, like Ukrainians, be in a position

0:28:03.600 --> 0:28:07.159
<v Speaker 1>to make the decision about their own future. If China

0:28:07.359 --> 0:28:10.920
<v Speaker 1>were to do something soon. One of the possibilities that

0:28:11.080 --> 0:28:13.879
<v Speaker 1>one of our other columnists, Tim Coulplan, has suggested is

0:28:13.880 --> 0:28:15.920
<v Speaker 1>that it could take an outlying island. It could take

0:28:15.960 --> 0:28:17.479
<v Speaker 1>one of the islands, just a mile or two off

0:28:17.560 --> 0:28:20.719
<v Speaker 1>the China coast as a non civilian, what would your

0:28:20.760 --> 0:28:26.399
<v Speaker 1>prognostication be. I think it's unlikely that President She would

0:28:26.440 --> 0:28:29.919
<v Speaker 1>even take let's say King Boy or Matsu one of

0:28:29.960 --> 0:28:32.720
<v Speaker 1>these islands that are very close to the Chinese coast.

0:28:33.680 --> 0:28:37.680
<v Speaker 1>They don't really gain much by doing that, and they

0:28:37.720 --> 0:28:41.520
<v Speaker 1>create a lot of instability, a lot of discussion. I

0:28:41.560 --> 0:28:44.520
<v Speaker 1>think Presidents She would rather not have. As he heads

0:28:44.600 --> 0:28:48.200
<v Speaker 1>into the the big Party Congress this fall, where he

0:28:48.280 --> 0:28:52.040
<v Speaker 1>hopes to be and probably will be elected for a

0:28:52.240 --> 0:28:54.600
<v Speaker 1>third five year term as a leader of China, I

0:28:54.640 --> 0:28:57.440
<v Speaker 1>think we're in for a year of living quietly with

0:28:57.520 --> 0:29:01.560
<v Speaker 1>China as this year unfold. Admiral James sta read us

0:29:02.080 --> 0:29:04.680
<v Speaker 1>and once again the Admiral's book To Risk at All

0:29:04.920 --> 0:29:08.080
<v Speaker 1>Nine Conflicts and The Clusible of Decision is just out

0:29:08.160 --> 0:29:11.719
<v Speaker 1>in bookstores and online. We are now choosing to end

0:29:11.760 --> 0:29:14.640
<v Speaker 1>all conversations not with you, though, please do get in touch.

0:29:14.880 --> 0:29:17.560
<v Speaker 1>I'm at Vonnie Quinn on Twitter or email v Quinn

0:29:17.600 --> 0:29:20.680
<v Speaker 1>at Bloomberg dot net. Bloomberg Opinion is also available as

0:29:20.680 --> 0:29:23.840
<v Speaker 1>a podcast on Apple, Spotify and wherever you get your

0:29:23.840 --> 0:29:27.320
<v Speaker 1>Podcasts were produced by Eric mollow Until Next Time on

0:29:27.360 --> 0:29:28.120
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg Opinion