WEBVTT - Day One, Part One at the Milken Global Conference

0:00:01.360 --> 0:00:05.680
<v Speaker 1>This is Bloomberg Business. Wait inside from the reporters and

0:00:05.880 --> 0:00:09.440
<v Speaker 1>editors who bring you America's most trusted business magazine, plus

0:00:09.520 --> 0:00:13.680
<v Speaker 1>global business finance and tech news. The Bloomberg Business Week

0:00:13.720 --> 0:00:19.000
<v Speaker 1>Podcast with Carol Messer and Tim Stenebeck from Bloomberg Radio.

0:00:20.800 --> 0:00:22.440
<v Speaker 2>If I do want to get to our guest, because

0:00:23.320 --> 0:00:25.480
<v Speaker 2>eighteen months ago our next guest held our Bloomberg team

0:00:25.520 --> 0:00:28.560
<v Speaker 2>that it was the golden age of private credit. Dun

0:00:28.680 --> 0:00:31.280
<v Speaker 2>Dun Dunn with us as Mark at NASIO. He's managing

0:00:31.280 --> 0:00:34.519
<v Speaker 2>partner at the Global Alternative Credit Investment from Crescent Capital

0:00:34.560 --> 0:00:37.720
<v Speaker 2>Managing Partners. They had some forty billion in assets under

0:00:37.760 --> 0:00:39.919
<v Speaker 2>management as the end of twenty twenty two. Mark also

0:00:40.000 --> 0:00:43.479
<v Speaker 2>chairman and owner of the Milwaukee Brewers baseball club.

0:00:44.000 --> 0:00:45.920
<v Speaker 3>Hello, very nice to see you again.

0:00:46.000 --> 0:00:47.720
<v Speaker 2>It's great to see you again. You know, I had

0:00:47.720 --> 0:00:50.000
<v Speaker 2>a question and we were talking over here. What's easier

0:00:50.040 --> 0:00:53.760
<v Speaker 2>owning an MLB team, investing in today's environment or growing

0:00:53.840 --> 0:00:55.520
<v Speaker 2>up in New Jersey and telling people that you're from

0:00:55.520 --> 0:00:58.880
<v Speaker 2>New Jersey. I can say that because I'm from New Jersey.

0:00:59.400 --> 0:01:00.680
<v Speaker 2>No playing with you.

0:01:00.800 --> 0:01:04.080
<v Speaker 3>It's always nice to connect with the fellow Jersey its.

0:01:03.960 --> 0:01:07.479
<v Speaker 2>I love New Jersey. Tell us about today's environment versus

0:01:07.520 --> 0:01:08.560
<v Speaker 2>a year ago.

0:01:09.120 --> 0:01:12.440
<v Speaker 3>So I actually bothered to go back and listen to

0:01:12.480 --> 0:01:15.640
<v Speaker 3>my broadcast and both on television and radio. You have

0:01:15.640 --> 0:01:18.880
<v Speaker 3>to see how badly I screwed up. You did not.

0:01:19.640 --> 0:01:22.440
<v Speaker 3>And I think the golden age of credit was almost

0:01:22.440 --> 0:01:25.440
<v Speaker 3>eighteen months ago I talked about and last year I

0:01:25.520 --> 0:01:28.399
<v Speaker 3>was worried about stagflation, and fortunately we didn't get that.

0:01:29.200 --> 0:01:32.160
<v Speaker 3>And so the environment for which we will discuss, the

0:01:32.240 --> 0:01:35.240
<v Speaker 3>environment for private credit is still is still quite good.

0:01:35.840 --> 0:01:38.759
<v Speaker 2>Actually for all levels, for all types. Because it's interesting.

0:01:38.800 --> 0:01:40.920
<v Speaker 2>I just gave up a real estate panel and they're saying,

0:01:40.920 --> 0:01:45.959
<v Speaker 2>you know, for valued properties, trophy properties, Class A properties,

0:01:46.160 --> 0:01:48.320
<v Speaker 2>you know, you're still seeing interest when you go down

0:01:48.320 --> 0:01:51.840
<v Speaker 2>the scale. It's not so much private credit, no distinctions

0:01:51.960 --> 0:01:52.480
<v Speaker 2>or yeah.

0:01:52.520 --> 0:01:56.520
<v Speaker 3>So real estate credit and including real estate private credits

0:01:56.520 --> 0:01:59.280
<v Speaker 3>a whole different animal than corporate credit, which is what

0:01:59.360 --> 0:02:02.000
<v Speaker 3>we focus on, right And there's a number of structural

0:02:02.400 --> 0:02:05.720
<v Speaker 3>challenges in real estate. There's a maturity wall in CMBs

0:02:05.720 --> 0:02:09.520
<v Speaker 3>that's coming up very fast with funds that will be

0:02:09.720 --> 0:02:11.959
<v Speaker 3>you know, needing to have liquidating and even have buyers,

0:02:12.000 --> 0:02:15.720
<v Speaker 3>which we don't have. Celos for the most part have

0:02:16.240 --> 0:02:20.040
<v Speaker 3>extended maturities now, and you know, I think also, and

0:02:20.080 --> 0:02:21.560
<v Speaker 3>it's easy for me to say and they'll say the

0:02:21.600 --> 0:02:24.799
<v Speaker 3>same about us, but I'm not sure. And I participated

0:02:24.800 --> 0:02:27.200
<v Speaker 3>in a lot of conferences like this and managed to

0:02:27.240 --> 0:02:30.600
<v Speaker 3>oversee a couple of endowments on charitable side. I'm not

0:02:30.600 --> 0:02:32.440
<v Speaker 3>sure the real estate marks are in the right place

0:02:32.560 --> 0:02:34.880
<v Speaker 3>just yet, not yet, So that needs to sort of

0:02:34.880 --> 0:02:39.000
<v Speaker 3>work its way through. And so it's challenging to find,

0:02:40.520 --> 0:02:42.600
<v Speaker 3>you know, the right part in the capstack to invest

0:02:42.600 --> 0:02:45.359
<v Speaker 3>in real estate now, Whereas you could argue the same

0:02:45.400 --> 0:02:48.200
<v Speaker 3>thing with corporate credit, and it's easier to go senior

0:02:49.000 --> 0:02:51.800
<v Speaker 3>because right now senior loans you yield over ten percent,

0:02:52.360 --> 0:02:55.799
<v Speaker 3>which isn't you know, it isn't bad right with with

0:02:55.840 --> 0:02:58.760
<v Speaker 3>the new you know for you know, so for you know,

0:02:58.960 --> 0:03:00.560
<v Speaker 3>close to five now.

0:03:01.320 --> 0:03:05.360
<v Speaker 2>Well, so it's interesting, so does that does this environment continue?

0:03:05.440 --> 0:03:07.080
<v Speaker 2>I'm like, I'm just curious. I think we're at this

0:03:07.280 --> 0:03:10.040
<v Speaker 2>juncture mark where we're trying to figure out, you know, recession,

0:03:10.040 --> 0:03:12.799
<v Speaker 2>no recession. We'll see what that we get from the

0:03:12.840 --> 0:03:14.240
<v Speaker 2>Fed this week. I mean, like, first of all, with

0:03:14.280 --> 0:03:17.440
<v Speaker 2>the Fed, how closely do you watch in terms of

0:03:17.480 --> 0:03:20.240
<v Speaker 2>what they're doing interest rates. We always does it matter

0:03:20.320 --> 0:03:20.679
<v Speaker 2>to you?

0:03:21.040 --> 0:03:24.480
<v Speaker 3>So moment to moment it doesn't. Now, once you've had

0:03:24.680 --> 0:03:26.520
<v Speaker 3>you know, four and a half, you know, four hundred

0:03:26.520 --> 0:03:29.280
<v Speaker 3>and fifty bases point, you know, increase in in the

0:03:29.960 --> 0:03:32.560
<v Speaker 3>you're right in the last year, you have to start watching.

0:03:32.560 --> 0:03:34.520
<v Speaker 3>And so but now everybody's on the edge of their

0:03:34.560 --> 0:03:37.760
<v Speaker 3>seat about whether the Fed's gonna hike and pause or not.

0:03:38.600 --> 0:03:40.480
<v Speaker 3>And you know, one of the things we talked about.

0:03:40.520 --> 0:03:43.760
<v Speaker 3>There's a private panel here yesterday for uh they called

0:03:43.800 --> 0:03:49.320
<v Speaker 3>them finance leaders, but so I I crashed that party,

0:03:50.320 --> 0:03:54.640
<v Speaker 3>no part of it. But but you know, Mike Milkin

0:03:54.720 --> 0:03:58.440
<v Speaker 3>came in and yeah, the tone for the conferences and

0:03:58.520 --> 0:04:01.240
<v Speaker 3>the theme is somewhat optimism. Yeah, but he came in

0:04:01.280 --> 0:04:02.880
<v Speaker 3>and talked to us about how we need to have

0:04:03.040 --> 0:04:06.840
<v Speaker 3>realism and so it really we all know the first

0:04:07.440 --> 0:04:10.920
<v Speaker 3>priority for the FED is to fight inflation, and they're

0:04:10.960 --> 0:04:13.560
<v Speaker 3>going to have to beat inflation almost at any cost.

0:04:14.200 --> 0:04:16.920
<v Speaker 3>So that if that's a when we're rate hike or

0:04:16.960 --> 0:04:19.360
<v Speaker 3>even two in a pause, that's great. If it has

0:04:19.400 --> 0:04:23.560
<v Speaker 3>to keep going, that starts to get into creating real

0:04:23.640 --> 0:04:27.440
<v Speaker 3>credit issues, not only in you know, corporate credit obviously,

0:04:27.480 --> 0:04:29.280
<v Speaker 3>but also in obviously in.

0:04:29.200 --> 0:04:31.000
<v Speaker 2>Real estate, Well, how problematic could it be?

0:04:32.320 --> 0:04:36.599
<v Speaker 3>Well, it's it's very problematic, depending on So I was

0:04:36.680 --> 0:04:40.279
<v Speaker 3>at a gathering JPM morganhead that Jamie Diamond spoke at,

0:04:40.920 --> 0:04:43.719
<v Speaker 3>and he was optimistic too, and very bullish on America,

0:04:43.760 --> 0:04:45.560
<v Speaker 3>which we all you know, I think everyone here is,

0:04:45.600 --> 0:04:48.000
<v Speaker 3>which is great, and we have a global audience here.

0:04:48.440 --> 0:04:51.520
<v Speaker 3>You can feel it, you can feel it, right And

0:04:52.080 --> 0:04:54.880
<v Speaker 3>obviously the fact I think you know that the takeover

0:04:55.040 --> 0:05:00.440
<v Speaker 3>today by JP Morgan on ufr C definitely it's okay.

0:05:00.440 --> 0:05:03.240
<v Speaker 3>Now we're over that hump, you know. However, he left

0:05:03.279 --> 0:05:04.920
<v Speaker 3>us with the thought everybody should go back to their

0:05:04.960 --> 0:05:07.960
<v Speaker 3>offices and budget for you know what happens if short

0:05:08.040 --> 0:05:11.279
<v Speaker 3>rates go to seven percent? Well that is that would

0:05:11.279 --> 0:05:14.240
<v Speaker 3>put you know, right now, in our credit portfolios, for example,

0:05:14.560 --> 0:05:17.080
<v Speaker 3>we have a handful of credits that are not you know,

0:05:17.200 --> 0:05:20.520
<v Speaker 3>within are not covering the cash flow. Yeah, you'll hear

0:05:20.520 --> 0:05:23.560
<v Speaker 3>a lot of managers like us say, like our portfolio is,

0:05:23.600 --> 0:05:27.440
<v Speaker 3>for example, the average credit quality of free cash flow

0:05:27.480 --> 0:05:30.960
<v Speaker 3>is one point six times plenty of cushion. But the

0:05:31.080 --> 0:05:34.320
<v Speaker 3>question is how many credits are at when times or below?

0:05:34.960 --> 0:05:36.599
<v Speaker 3>Right now, we have just a handful and those are

0:05:36.640 --> 0:05:39.160
<v Speaker 3>the ones we focus on. If you get another two

0:05:39.240 --> 0:05:42.280
<v Speaker 3>hundred basis points built into the system, there's gonna be

0:05:42.279 --> 0:05:43.920
<v Speaker 3>a lot more than a handful of credits.

0:05:43.680 --> 0:05:44.760
<v Speaker 2>That have com lismore.

0:05:45.800 --> 0:05:49.039
<v Speaker 3>I think it depends on Uh, you know, we've always

0:05:49.120 --> 0:05:51.839
<v Speaker 3>lent to six times cash flow, so I think you

0:05:51.880 --> 0:05:54.200
<v Speaker 3>know or under so I think we'll be okay. But

0:05:54.640 --> 0:05:56.960
<v Speaker 3>the broader market has already stretched out to seven and

0:05:57.120 --> 0:06:01.520
<v Speaker 3>recent transactions you've seen seven times and maybe a pick

0:06:01.560 --> 0:06:05.200
<v Speaker 3>component which right, pick toggle, which you'll pick toggle go

0:06:05.320 --> 0:06:05.560
<v Speaker 3>back to?

0:06:06.560 --> 0:06:07.279
<v Speaker 2>It all comes around.

0:06:07.320 --> 0:06:09.880
<v Speaker 3>It's like the usc UF. You know, student body left,

0:06:09.880 --> 0:06:11.479
<v Speaker 3>student body right off tackle play.

0:06:11.720 --> 0:06:13.839
<v Speaker 2>How likely is it we get another two hundred basis points?

0:06:13.880 --> 0:06:16.599
<v Speaker 2>Does that even make sense? I mean, the FED certainly

0:06:16.640 --> 0:06:19.039
<v Speaker 2>seems like they're on this mission, but you you you

0:06:19.160 --> 0:06:20.239
<v Speaker 2>have to ask at what cost?

0:06:20.600 --> 0:06:23.720
<v Speaker 3>Here's where you get worried. Right, everybody is lined up

0:06:23.800 --> 0:06:26.080
<v Speaker 3>on the side of the trade that that's not going

0:06:26.160 --> 0:06:29.560
<v Speaker 3>to have everybody. You talk to everybody the in fact,

0:06:29.600 --> 0:06:31.359
<v Speaker 3>the only person I have said you heard raise that

0:06:31.560 --> 0:06:35.000
<v Speaker 3>is in this private session that Jamie Diamond had and

0:06:35.000 --> 0:06:39.760
<v Speaker 3>and so you know, I okay. It creates all kinds

0:06:39.760 --> 0:06:42.799
<v Speaker 3>of prompts for the deficity. There's the whole domino effect,

0:06:43.120 --> 0:06:45.520
<v Speaker 3>well beyond what you know I do in my day job,

0:06:45.720 --> 0:06:48.440
<v Speaker 3>right and and so uh, but they've got to be

0:06:48.480 --> 0:06:48.880
<v Speaker 3>they can't.

0:06:48.880 --> 0:06:51.800
<v Speaker 2>They've got to beat inflation, all right, they have to

0:06:51.800 --> 0:06:56.800
<v Speaker 2>beat inflation. It's interesting, all right. So so if they

0:06:56.839 --> 0:06:59.200
<v Speaker 2>continue on the course, which they seem to do, I mean,

0:06:59.279 --> 0:07:01.919
<v Speaker 2>are you anticipate a recession? I mean, it's interesting this

0:07:01.960 --> 0:07:03.800
<v Speaker 2>panel I just came off of, and you know, I

0:07:03.839 --> 0:07:06.200
<v Speaker 2>said a year ago, what's surprised you about what happened

0:07:06.200 --> 0:07:09.280
<v Speaker 2>over the past year. And one of the individuals, David

0:07:10.440 --> 0:07:13.800
<v Speaker 2>who is over at hind So Global Corporate real Estate,

0:07:13.800 --> 0:07:16.200
<v Speaker 2>are global real estate of all kinds, and just said,

0:07:16.200 --> 0:07:18.600
<v Speaker 2>I really thought we'd be through the recession at this point.

0:07:19.120 --> 0:07:21.240
<v Speaker 2>So I'm just curious how you see it.

0:07:22.640 --> 0:07:28.520
<v Speaker 3>That's real estate realist colored classes. So it keeps getting

0:07:28.800 --> 0:07:33.280
<v Speaker 3>pushed out, right, And look, we can manage through a recession.

0:07:33.440 --> 0:07:35.360
<v Speaker 3>That's not an issue. And I think there are a

0:07:35.400 --> 0:07:38.360
<v Speaker 3>lot of other things now that are much greater fears

0:07:38.360 --> 0:07:41.880
<v Speaker 3>that seem to be surmounted. Every banking executive here we

0:07:41.920 --> 0:07:45.200
<v Speaker 3>had a dinner last night. Did Jane Frazer spoke at Yeah,

0:07:45.240 --> 0:07:48.040
<v Speaker 3>you know, the US banking system globally is considered the

0:07:48.080 --> 0:07:50.840
<v Speaker 3>strongest in the world. She pointed out this forty seven

0:07:50.960 --> 0:07:53.600
<v Speaker 3>hundred banks in our country, and there's three that have

0:07:53.640 --> 0:07:57.360
<v Speaker 3>had issues, and so we don't have you know, the

0:07:57.880 --> 0:08:02.559
<v Speaker 3>financial system is strong. And so the question is whether

0:08:03.040 --> 0:08:06.080
<v Speaker 3>either rates get so high that they and we still

0:08:06.120 --> 0:08:09.760
<v Speaker 3>have growth, right and pretty much everywhere, right, Labor costs

0:08:09.800 --> 0:08:12.560
<v Speaker 3>are high in certain sectors by chains actually sort of

0:08:12.560 --> 0:08:14.080
<v Speaker 3>figured out. So if it just ends up being a

0:08:14.680 --> 0:08:18.080
<v Speaker 3>slow down, that would be okay. And that's surmountable for

0:08:18.320 --> 0:08:20.480
<v Speaker 3>I think for everything, for not only for corporate credit,

0:08:20.520 --> 0:08:22.320
<v Speaker 3>but for real estate as well.

0:08:22.480 --> 0:08:25.400
<v Speaker 2>So when you look at investments, most attractive is it

0:08:25.440 --> 0:08:27.480
<v Speaker 2>high yield? Is it bank loans, direct lending?

0:08:28.920 --> 0:08:32.120
<v Speaker 3>So we you know, we're the high yel market is

0:08:32.160 --> 0:08:36.319
<v Speaker 3>finally high yield. Interestingly, you know, the generic high yeal

0:08:36.400 --> 0:08:40.199
<v Speaker 3>bond market is yielding only quote only eight percent. We're

0:08:40.240 --> 0:08:43.280
<v Speaker 3>delighted with that. Yeah, anything we have floating rates ten

0:08:43.320 --> 0:08:47.840
<v Speaker 3>percent plus. So for investors, you know, we now have

0:08:47.960 --> 0:08:51.800
<v Speaker 3>concerns about credit, so we can't call it the golden

0:08:51.840 --> 0:08:55.480
<v Speaker 3>age anymore. Yeah, but for our embedded portfolios, which are

0:08:55.480 --> 0:08:58.199
<v Speaker 3>in really good shape, and investors are getting hundreds of

0:08:58.240 --> 0:09:00.400
<v Speaker 3>basis points more in yield now than they did eighteen

0:09:00.440 --> 0:09:02.080
<v Speaker 3>months ago. Our investors are.

0:09:01.960 --> 0:09:05.520
<v Speaker 2>Happy, not too shabby, Brewers. What can we expect this year?

0:09:06.120 --> 0:09:07.280
<v Speaker 2>Is that easier?

0:09:07.400 --> 0:09:07.480
<v Speaker 4>No?

0:09:07.800 --> 0:09:09.520
<v Speaker 3>And I'll tell you that I got involved in English

0:09:09.520 --> 0:09:11.280
<v Speaker 3>football in the last six months. I know you, and

0:09:11.320 --> 0:09:12.640
<v Speaker 3>I was going to tell you. If you say, well,

0:09:12.640 --> 0:09:16.800
<v Speaker 3>what's harder investing? I love that one, Brewers or growing

0:09:16.880 --> 0:09:19.360
<v Speaker 3>up in New Jersey, the answer would have been English football,

0:09:19.360 --> 0:09:22.199
<v Speaker 3>it's harder. And Todd Bowley may have a perspective, and

0:09:22.240 --> 0:09:26.720
<v Speaker 3>then I'm clearly a Chelsea I'm sure it doesn't. But

0:09:27.960 --> 0:09:30.440
<v Speaker 3>so look we're off to a good start. We're eighteen

0:09:30.480 --> 0:09:33.760
<v Speaker 3>and ten. It beats ten and eighteen like like with credit,

0:09:33.840 --> 0:09:37.640
<v Speaker 3>you just worry about everything. We've had a number of injuries. Yeah,

0:09:38.480 --> 0:09:41.320
<v Speaker 3>but the team looks you know that. You take a

0:09:41.360 --> 0:09:45.880
<v Speaker 3>lot in sports from the feel of the clubhouse. Yeah,

0:09:45.920 --> 0:09:47.160
<v Speaker 3>and our clubhouse feels great.

0:09:47.600 --> 0:09:49.480
<v Speaker 2>Well. I have to say it was great to catch

0:09:49.559 --> 0:09:51.320
<v Speaker 2>up with you again. Thank you for giving us all

0:09:51.360 --> 0:09:55.000
<v Speaker 2>so much time, Mark, ad Andasio again. Wow, good to

0:09:55.040 --> 0:09:56.240
<v Speaker 2>see you all.

0:09:56.320 --> 0:09:56.440
<v Speaker 3>Right.

0:09:56.440 --> 0:09:58.600
<v Speaker 2>You are listening and watching Bloomberg Business Week. We're live

0:09:58.600 --> 0:09:59.120
<v Speaker 2>at Milkin.

0:09:59.440 --> 0:10:03.040
<v Speaker 1>You're listening to the Bloomberg Business Week podcast. Catch us

0:10:03.040 --> 0:10:06.439
<v Speaker 1>live weekday afternoons from three to six Eastern Listen on

0:10:06.480 --> 0:10:10.520
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg dot com, the iHeartRadio app, and the Bloomberg Business App,

0:10:10.800 --> 0:10:12.600
<v Speaker 1>or watch us live on YouTube.

0:10:13.320 --> 0:10:16.520
<v Speaker 2>We're at the Milkon Institute Global Conference. It's an incredible

0:10:16.559 --> 0:10:19.640
<v Speaker 2>gathering of so many different individuals, and I'm delighted to

0:10:19.679 --> 0:10:22.040
<v Speaker 2>have with us Sheila Patels, she's Vice Chairman to be Capital,

0:10:22.080 --> 0:10:25.080
<v Speaker 2>former chairman of Goldman Sachs Asset Management. Because I feel like,

0:10:25.120 --> 0:10:27.160
<v Speaker 2>first of all, great to have you here again and

0:10:27.200 --> 0:10:29.280
<v Speaker 2>tell us to be here. I always feel like a

0:10:29.320 --> 0:10:31.440
<v Speaker 2>great indicator of the economy is what's going on in

0:10:31.480 --> 0:10:34.280
<v Speaker 2>the startup world, So tell us what you're seeing. Let's

0:10:34.280 --> 0:10:34.680
<v Speaker 2>go macro.

0:10:34.800 --> 0:10:37.560
<v Speaker 5>First of all, Well, look, I think the macro environment

0:10:37.720 --> 0:10:40.040
<v Speaker 5>was already difficult for venture given what had gone on

0:10:40.080 --> 0:10:42.160
<v Speaker 5>in tech, and then you layer on what's going on

0:10:42.240 --> 0:10:44.800
<v Speaker 5>in banking, and it's a bit of a perfect storm

0:10:44.840 --> 0:10:47.120
<v Speaker 5>when you think about what founders have to go through

0:10:47.559 --> 0:10:50.480
<v Speaker 5>in normal times to start a company, much less today.

0:10:50.720 --> 0:10:51.760
<v Speaker 2>So has it stopped?

0:10:52.240 --> 0:10:53.120
<v Speaker 5>It hasn't stopped.

0:10:53.160 --> 0:10:54.320
<v Speaker 2>Okay, it hasn't stopped.

0:10:54.360 --> 0:10:56.440
<v Speaker 5>I think the good news is when you hear about

0:10:56.520 --> 0:10:59.920
<v Speaker 5>dry powder, that's not a fake thing, that's real.

0:11:00.120 --> 0:11:00.560
<v Speaker 2>Yeah.

0:11:00.640 --> 0:11:02.480
<v Speaker 5>You know, we were fortunate enough with the capital to

0:11:02.559 --> 0:11:05.120
<v Speaker 5>raise a large fund last year. We still have plenty

0:11:05.120 --> 0:11:07.480
<v Speaker 5>of that to deploy with our existing companies and to

0:11:07.520 --> 0:11:10.960
<v Speaker 5>look for new opportunities. I think that one of the

0:11:10.960 --> 0:11:13.880
<v Speaker 5>things you see experienced investors say to us right now,

0:11:13.960 --> 0:11:17.840
<v Speaker 5>people that have been LPs over many vintages, is they

0:11:17.920 --> 0:11:21.320
<v Speaker 5>remember what happened after the global financial crisis. They remember

0:11:21.360 --> 0:11:23.640
<v Speaker 5>what happened in the dot com bubble. The next four

0:11:23.679 --> 0:11:26.319
<v Speaker 5>to five years after those were some of the best vintages.

0:11:26.960 --> 0:11:30.160
<v Speaker 5>And once again we're in one of those periods, and

0:11:30.200 --> 0:11:33.079
<v Speaker 5>we have a new series of technologies, one of them

0:11:33.080 --> 0:11:36.920
<v Speaker 5>being generated of AI that could be so impactful to

0:11:36.960 --> 0:11:37.599
<v Speaker 5>the good.

0:11:37.600 --> 0:11:39.280
<v Speaker 2>I want to talk about that, Tilla, but I want

0:11:39.280 --> 0:11:42.560
<v Speaker 2>to ask you. I am curious that Silicon Valley Bank,

0:11:42.920 --> 0:11:45.560
<v Speaker 2>the collapse of that bank, which was so crucial to

0:11:45.600 --> 0:11:49.040
<v Speaker 2>the startup community and out there in San Francisco, Silicon Valley.

0:11:49.440 --> 0:11:52.920
<v Speaker 2>What impact did you see as a result of that specifically?

0:11:53.200 --> 0:11:55.280
<v Speaker 5>Well, I think you know, one good thing saw was

0:11:55.320 --> 0:11:58.840
<v Speaker 5>the community came together quite strongly, right behind their companies,

0:11:58.960 --> 0:12:02.079
<v Speaker 5>together to try to work things out, to try to

0:12:02.120 --> 0:12:05.080
<v Speaker 5>make sure people were making payroll and all the mundane

0:12:05.120 --> 0:12:08.319
<v Speaker 5>things that you need to keep an ecosystem going when

0:12:08.360 --> 0:12:11.800
<v Speaker 5>it's taken a big hit. I also think you saw recognition,

0:12:11.960 --> 0:12:14.480
<v Speaker 5>and maybe the UK was a little faster to this

0:12:14.559 --> 0:12:17.760
<v Speaker 5>than the US that the innovation economy has a huge

0:12:17.840 --> 0:12:21.400
<v Speaker 5>number of jobs associated with it, so letting it flounder

0:12:22.200 --> 0:12:25.640
<v Speaker 5>because of an issue like this is not about letting

0:12:25.720 --> 0:12:30.120
<v Speaker 5>some tech bros suffer in particular zip.

0:12:29.920 --> 0:12:30.840
<v Speaker 2>Code in California.

0:12:31.120 --> 0:12:34.680
<v Speaker 5>It's about real companies that have been founded anywhere from

0:12:34.720 --> 0:12:38.760
<v Speaker 5>Ohio to Jakarta, having a funding plan, having a business plan,

0:12:38.920 --> 0:12:42.160
<v Speaker 5>having hired people, and not being able to fulfill their

0:12:42.160 --> 0:12:44.079
<v Speaker 5>promises to their clients and their employees.

0:12:44.240 --> 0:12:46.839
<v Speaker 2>Did you have any direct impact from the collapse any

0:12:46.840 --> 0:12:48.520
<v Speaker 2>of your companies, your portfolio companies.

0:12:48.640 --> 0:12:52.560
<v Speaker 5>You know, we've been very lucky we had We did

0:12:52.559 --> 0:12:56.680
<v Speaker 5>not have anything particularly notable for ourselves or our portfolio companies.

0:12:56.760 --> 0:13:00.760
<v Speaker 5>We've always encouraged and maybe it's because Howard Morgan has

0:13:00.960 --> 0:13:04.400
<v Speaker 5>chair with his storied history and venture and me with

0:13:04.600 --> 0:13:09.240
<v Speaker 5>my Goldmen background and that associated risk obsession, always felt

0:13:09.240 --> 0:13:13.000
<v Speaker 5>that diversification was important and cash management was important, and

0:13:13.040 --> 0:13:15.400
<v Speaker 5>so had given that advice, had taken that advice, and

0:13:16.280 --> 0:13:18.920
<v Speaker 5>you know we're able to manage through it quite quite effectively.

0:13:19.000 --> 0:13:21.360
<v Speaker 2>All right, So talk to me about opportunities that you

0:13:21.360 --> 0:13:23.520
<v Speaker 2>guys are seeing of interest right now? What's coming your way?

0:13:23.559 --> 0:13:26.920
<v Speaker 2>You mentioned AI, right, we're all just talking generative AI,

0:13:27.000 --> 0:13:30.280
<v Speaker 2>and it's interesting. It's coming up. I'm sure a lot

0:13:30.280 --> 0:13:32.199
<v Speaker 2>here in terms of panels. We're all trying to figure

0:13:32.200 --> 0:13:36.000
<v Speaker 2>out how many opportunities are coming your way? Is it

0:13:36.720 --> 0:13:38.520
<v Speaker 2>a lot of them? In terms of deals that you're

0:13:38.559 --> 0:13:39.000
<v Speaker 2>looking at?

0:13:39.200 --> 0:13:40.840
<v Speaker 5>Look, I think there's a number of things coming, but

0:13:40.920 --> 0:13:43.760
<v Speaker 5>I think there's a number of companies we already invested in. Yeah,

0:13:43.880 --> 0:13:47.360
<v Speaker 5>that people and appreciate that this is AI. You know,

0:13:47.400 --> 0:13:48.640
<v Speaker 5>it's like, what is that? What is it?

0:13:48.760 --> 0:13:48.800
<v Speaker 3>No?

0:13:48.920 --> 0:13:49.720
<v Speaker 2>You have it already.

0:13:50.120 --> 0:13:52.840
<v Speaker 5>It's why Google knows what you're gonna ask it before

0:13:52.880 --> 0:13:53.920
<v Speaker 5>you've asked, right.

0:13:53.720 --> 0:13:55.800
<v Speaker 2>You're type, it's right when it fills in a letter.

0:13:56.920 --> 0:14:00.240
<v Speaker 5>They know your dress size when you're you know, have

0:14:00.280 --> 0:14:04.480
<v Speaker 5>bought something a certain number of times. It's embedded slowly

0:14:04.480 --> 0:14:07.240
<v Speaker 5>but surely in so many places. And so what we've

0:14:07.280 --> 0:14:10.360
<v Speaker 5>seen that we're excited about is there are so many

0:14:10.440 --> 0:14:14.960
<v Speaker 5>mundane ways AI can make businesses do better, can achieve

0:14:15.040 --> 0:14:18.040
<v Speaker 5>cost reductions, which in this environment is probably one of

0:14:18.120 --> 0:14:20.200
<v Speaker 5>the primary things people are looking for. It a way

0:14:20.240 --> 0:14:22.440
<v Speaker 5>for your business to thrive. At the same time, everybody's

0:14:22.440 --> 0:14:24.240
<v Speaker 5>worried about a recession. If you have a business that

0:14:24.600 --> 0:14:27.480
<v Speaker 5>shows up that can save money, right, you're welcome with

0:14:27.520 --> 0:14:30.320
<v Speaker 5>open arms, come in, help us, help us save money,

0:14:30.360 --> 0:14:32.800
<v Speaker 5>or help us find places that are new revenue sources.

0:14:32.840 --> 0:14:34.760
<v Speaker 2>So when you think of AI or what you're seeing

0:14:34.760 --> 0:14:36.720
<v Speaker 2>in terms of you know, possible companies to invest in

0:14:36.840 --> 0:14:39.000
<v Speaker 2>or you are investing, it is a lot more It's

0:14:39.080 --> 0:14:42.520
<v Speaker 2>not kind of out there, right, it's much more simplistic.

0:14:42.520 --> 0:14:44.240
<v Speaker 2>As you say, maybe it makes you more productive. This

0:14:44.280 --> 0:14:45.120
<v Speaker 2>is what we're talking about.

0:14:45.240 --> 0:14:48.120
<v Speaker 5>A great example is a company we invested in a

0:14:48.160 --> 0:14:54.120
<v Speaker 5>while ago, not recently, but that does document analysis and management,

0:14:54.200 --> 0:14:57.880
<v Speaker 5>basically information management for the contracts that a company might have.

0:14:57.920 --> 0:15:00.800
<v Speaker 5>And you think about a huge multinational if thousands and

0:15:00.840 --> 0:15:03.320
<v Speaker 5>thousands of contracts, right, who knows what's in them, who's

0:15:03.320 --> 0:15:05.600
<v Speaker 5>managing them like supply chain, who's checking them?

0:15:05.840 --> 0:15:06.040
<v Speaker 6>Right?

0:15:06.080 --> 0:15:09.640
<v Speaker 5>And that became important during COVID because of disruption clauses.

0:15:10.000 --> 0:15:12.840
<v Speaker 5>What's important now, well, we've done some projects with that

0:15:12.960 --> 0:15:15.960
<v Speaker 5>company and our good friends at BCG with whom we

0:15:16.000 --> 0:15:18.400
<v Speaker 5>have a special relationship, work with them as well, and

0:15:18.440 --> 0:15:20.840
<v Speaker 5>we realized, you know, for one of the special projects

0:15:20.920 --> 0:15:25.000
<v Speaker 5>they did, a company they were pitching had CPI clauses

0:15:25.040 --> 0:15:28.160
<v Speaker 5>embedded all over the place in their deals that they

0:15:28.160 --> 0:15:31.720
<v Speaker 5>hadn't executed on. So they were owed higher fees for

0:15:31.800 --> 0:15:34.560
<v Speaker 5>their services and they had never claimed those fees. They

0:15:34.600 --> 0:15:37.840
<v Speaker 5>had never asked their clients to act on the CPI

0:15:37.880 --> 0:15:40.960
<v Speaker 5>clauses that had been embedded because they they forgot what's

0:15:41.000 --> 0:15:41.800
<v Speaker 5>in the thousands?

0:15:41.840 --> 0:15:44.360
<v Speaker 2>Do you think about something like filtering through right?

0:15:44.440 --> 0:15:47.120
<v Speaker 5>AI can find things like that in a systematic way,

0:15:47.120 --> 0:15:49.880
<v Speaker 5>as opposed to you're just relying on who's the person

0:15:49.920 --> 0:15:52.440
<v Speaker 5>that's most on top of their clients to figure that out.

0:15:52.680 --> 0:15:56.240
<v Speaker 2>So in this environment, are is there a valuation reset

0:15:56.320 --> 0:15:58.320
<v Speaker 2>that you're seeing in terms of some of the deals

0:15:58.320 --> 0:15:59.360
<v Speaker 2>and when it comes to funding.

0:16:00.040 --> 0:16:03.800
<v Speaker 5>Yeah, Look, I think everybody bandies are about different percentages.

0:16:03.880 --> 0:16:05.920
<v Speaker 5>Probably the most common I think that people are seeing

0:16:05.960 --> 0:16:08.600
<v Speaker 5>across his face is down forty to fifty percent. Right

0:16:09.640 --> 0:16:13.960
<v Speaker 5>In terms of valuation significant, it's significant. I think it

0:16:14.040 --> 0:16:16.120
<v Speaker 5>very much depends on the stage. I think you've seen

0:16:16.160 --> 0:16:19.320
<v Speaker 5>a lot more weakness in late stage. Within the first quarter,

0:16:19.360 --> 0:16:21.440
<v Speaker 5>only about eight percent of funding going to late stage,

0:16:21.480 --> 0:16:24.960
<v Speaker 5>sixty seven percent went to early stage, and funding there

0:16:25.080 --> 0:16:29.280
<v Speaker 5>and valuations there are much less challenged. I also think

0:16:29.360 --> 0:16:32.000
<v Speaker 5>that a lot of people were reliant and hoping that

0:16:32.160 --> 0:16:33.760
<v Speaker 5>M and A would come back quickly, and I think

0:16:33.800 --> 0:16:36.880
<v Speaker 5>it's much slower go because even corporate M and A,

0:16:36.960 --> 0:16:40.920
<v Speaker 5>even companies that were looking to maybe acquire as their

0:16:40.960 --> 0:16:43.680
<v Speaker 5>source of innovation, because it's still hard for companies to

0:16:43.680 --> 0:16:46.640
<v Speaker 5>innovate from within. They can afford to wait a bit,

0:16:46.720 --> 0:16:48.760
<v Speaker 5>and they can afford to push on valuations or push

0:16:48.840 --> 0:16:49.760
<v Speaker 5>some unique terms.

0:16:50.280 --> 0:16:52.640
<v Speaker 2>Is it still like, you know, the goal is it IPO?

0:16:52.800 --> 0:16:54.520
<v Speaker 2>I mean, we've talked about for years. I feel like

0:16:54.560 --> 0:16:57.080
<v Speaker 2>that there was so much funding out there and abled

0:16:57.120 --> 0:16:59.080
<v Speaker 2>startup companies to stick around for a little bit longer,

0:16:59.080 --> 0:17:00.800
<v Speaker 2>which and some would argue was a good thing that

0:17:00.840 --> 0:17:03.760
<v Speaker 2>they could really kind of develop themselves. But I'm just curious,

0:17:04.280 --> 0:17:07.000
<v Speaker 2>what are your expectations in terms of IPO markets and

0:17:07.040 --> 0:17:07.720
<v Speaker 2>what we might say.

0:17:08.080 --> 0:17:11.280
<v Speaker 5>Look, I think inevitably they'll come back, they always do.

0:17:12.160 --> 0:17:14.440
<v Speaker 5>But I do think it does serve as a wake

0:17:14.520 --> 0:17:16.320
<v Speaker 5>up call as to is that the best route for

0:17:16.359 --> 0:17:20.240
<v Speaker 5>every company. And so when you think about growth and

0:17:20.280 --> 0:17:24.240
<v Speaker 5>you think about most founders' ambitions for their companies, I

0:17:24.240 --> 0:17:26.040
<v Speaker 5>think IPO is the easy one that seems like, Oh,

0:17:26.040 --> 0:17:28.119
<v Speaker 5>I'm gonna build this and I'm going to turn it

0:17:28.160 --> 0:17:32.920
<v Speaker 5>into its standalone success. But for some companies it might

0:17:32.960 --> 0:17:35.399
<v Speaker 5>make sense to stay private a lot longer and figure

0:17:35.400 --> 0:17:38.520
<v Speaker 5>out your funding from that perspective. For some, you know,

0:17:38.680 --> 0:17:42.199
<v Speaker 5>corporate M and A was something that was rejected two

0:17:42.320 --> 0:17:44.320
<v Speaker 5>or three years ago that today they look at and say,

0:17:44.320 --> 0:17:46.959
<v Speaker 5>maybe that makes sense. Maybe I'd have an installed client

0:17:47.000 --> 0:17:50.040
<v Speaker 5>base of the ten thousand best customers around the world

0:17:50.040 --> 0:17:52.560
<v Speaker 5>I need to ride away if I would just allow

0:17:52.640 --> 0:17:55.639
<v Speaker 5>myself to become part of a bigger enterprise, right And

0:17:56.200 --> 0:17:58.600
<v Speaker 5>I think more people have opened their eyes to those

0:17:58.680 --> 0:18:02.959
<v Speaker 5>different types of exit opportunities or future steps for their companies.

0:18:03.080 --> 0:18:04.879
<v Speaker 2>One thing I wanted to ask you guys, are playing

0:18:04.880 --> 0:18:09.760
<v Speaker 2>an enterprise fintech, healthcare, bio. We talked there's a category

0:18:09.800 --> 0:18:13.080
<v Speaker 2>opportunistic sort of an infrastructure tech for commerce and emerging

0:18:13.080 --> 0:18:17.640
<v Speaker 2>markets and more. What's the most active area right now

0:18:17.640 --> 0:18:19.480
<v Speaker 2>when it comes to investing for you guys.

0:18:19.560 --> 0:18:23.119
<v Speaker 5>Well, it's interesting, I'd say it's much more about what

0:18:23.240 --> 0:18:27.240
<v Speaker 5>are the most driven interesting founders. I wouldn't say a

0:18:27.240 --> 0:18:29.919
<v Speaker 5>sector stands out the most. I do think, you know,

0:18:30.080 --> 0:18:34.160
<v Speaker 5>enterprise and healthcare still have a fair bit of resilience,

0:18:34.240 --> 0:18:36.600
<v Speaker 5>and that's been great to see. I mean, healthcare needs

0:18:36.640 --> 0:18:38.520
<v Speaker 5>so much done and there's so much value there. I

0:18:38.520 --> 0:18:40.159
<v Speaker 5>feel like there's a lot of activity right now, a

0:18:40.200 --> 0:18:42.120
<v Speaker 5>lot of activity. Now you have to make sure it's

0:18:42.119 --> 0:18:46.040
<v Speaker 5>at the right valuation. Enterprise and software as a service

0:18:46.040 --> 0:18:49.639
<v Speaker 5>has been more resilient than we expected, and that's I

0:18:49.680 --> 0:18:51.840
<v Speaker 5>think that's a positive as well. And then you know,

0:18:51.920 --> 0:18:54.360
<v Speaker 5>one area that we've been spending quite a bit more

0:18:54.359 --> 0:18:56.639
<v Speaker 5>time on that we already have embedded in some portfolios

0:18:56.640 --> 0:19:00.000
<v Speaker 5>and we'll probably dedicate ourselves to in a standalone way

0:19:00.160 --> 0:19:01.000
<v Speaker 5>sometime in the future.

0:19:01.080 --> 0:19:05.240
<v Speaker 2>Is climate tech. Climate tech huge interesting.

0:19:04.760 --> 0:19:08.840
<v Speaker 5>An AI plus climate we see what we learned there twenty.

0:19:08.640 --> 0:19:11.000
<v Speaker 2>Seconds climate tech because of the money we're seeing from

0:19:11.040 --> 0:19:13.480
<v Speaker 2>governments or what's changed because I feel like.

0:19:13.560 --> 0:19:16.000
<v Speaker 5>A carrot and a stick. Do you have the governments

0:19:16.000 --> 0:19:19.840
<v Speaker 5>that are demanding new rules, new regulations, companies that have

0:19:19.880 --> 0:19:23.560
<v Speaker 5>to comply standards that are starting you unify from a

0:19:23.560 --> 0:19:27.240
<v Speaker 5>global perspective, and then you have the flip side, which

0:19:27.400 --> 0:19:30.040
<v Speaker 5>is the stick. The stick is the risk. The stick

0:19:30.119 --> 0:19:32.840
<v Speaker 5>is what you'll face by not doing something and finding

0:19:32.880 --> 0:19:35.200
<v Speaker 5>that you've built a plant in a place that's subject

0:19:35.240 --> 0:19:38.720
<v Speaker 5>to floods, or you've you know, enshored a risk that's

0:19:39.080 --> 0:19:40.120
<v Speaker 5>truly unensurable.

0:19:41.000 --> 0:19:42.880
<v Speaker 2>So glad we ended on that note. It meant there

0:19:43.320 --> 0:19:44.000
<v Speaker 2>free to check.

0:19:43.840 --> 0:19:45.800
<v Speaker 5>In with you and thank you so much, Thanks so much,

0:19:46.000 --> 0:19:47.440
<v Speaker 5>a great look and conference.

0:19:47.440 --> 0:19:50.600
<v Speaker 2>Thanks for going on. Chili Betel, vice chairman at Being Capital.

0:19:51.400 --> 0:19:56.399
<v Speaker 1>Here at Milkin, you're listening to the Bloomberg Business Week podcast.

0:19:56.640 --> 0:19:59.680
<v Speaker 1>Catch us live weekday afternoons from three to six Easter

0:20:00.160 --> 0:20:03.800
<v Speaker 1>on Bloomberg Radio, the Bloomberg Business app and YouTube. You

0:20:03.840 --> 0:20:07.080
<v Speaker 1>can also listen live on Amazon Alexa from our flagship

0:20:07.160 --> 0:20:11.080
<v Speaker 1>New York station just say Alexa playing Bloomberg eleven thirty.

0:20:12.760 --> 0:20:14.600
<v Speaker 2>Our next guest, I want to get right to him,

0:20:14.880 --> 0:20:17.080
<v Speaker 2>Steve Klinsky. He's founder and CEO of the private equity

0:20:17.119 --> 0:20:20.399
<v Speaker 2>and credit from New Mountain Capital and together with its affiliates,

0:20:20.440 --> 0:20:25.120
<v Speaker 2>manages PE Credit in Netley's Capital. Some assets under management

0:20:25.160 --> 0:20:27.240
<v Speaker 2>about thirty seven billion dollars. It's a lot.

0:20:27.240 --> 0:20:29.720
<v Speaker 6>How are you very well? Thanks for having meh.

0:20:29.920 --> 0:20:33.240
<v Speaker 2>It's great to have you back here this year versus

0:20:33.359 --> 0:20:35.760
<v Speaker 2>last year. What's top of mind?

0:20:35.960 --> 0:20:39.320
<v Speaker 6>Well, you know, obviously the economy is still kind of

0:20:39.359 --> 0:20:42.640
<v Speaker 6>limping along. Yeah, I think inflations getting more under control.

0:20:44.640 --> 0:20:47.120
<v Speaker 6>You know, the deal volume is low, but I think

0:20:47.280 --> 0:20:49.120
<v Speaker 6>likely to be picking up and things are quite good

0:20:49.119 --> 0:20:52.119
<v Speaker 6>for my firm, So you know, it's kind of more

0:20:52.119 --> 0:20:53.200
<v Speaker 6>of the same from last year.

0:20:53.280 --> 0:20:55.280
<v Speaker 2>Well, one thing I wanted to ask you. You your

0:20:55.320 --> 0:20:57.160
<v Speaker 2>firm was founded back in nineteen ninety nine, so you've

0:20:57.160 --> 0:20:59.400
<v Speaker 2>gone through the dot com bubble, right, You've gone through

0:20:59.400 --> 0:21:01.919
<v Speaker 2>the financial care is the pandemic, and then where we

0:21:01.960 --> 0:21:03.960
<v Speaker 2>are today in terms of bank collapses. We've had a

0:21:03.960 --> 0:21:07.200
<v Speaker 2>crypto collapse, and I'm just curious, how do those times

0:21:07.200 --> 0:21:09.000
<v Speaker 2>do you compare to where we are today?

0:21:09.200 --> 0:21:12.000
<v Speaker 6>Yeah. I actually started in October eighty one.

0:21:11.920 --> 0:21:14.680
<v Speaker 2>So forgive me. Yeah, well, right, that was twenty.

0:21:14.480 --> 0:21:16.960
<v Speaker 6>Years of from from an interest rates for tenure troices

0:21:17.000 --> 0:21:19.399
<v Speaker 6>for fifteen point eight percent, So I lived through eighty

0:21:19.440 --> 0:21:22.520
<v Speaker 6>seven and all those things. I would say, this is

0:21:22.600 --> 0:21:25.840
<v Speaker 6>not a crisis like seven or eight. It's not a

0:21:25.880 --> 0:21:28.560
<v Speaker 6>crisis like when COVID shut the whole world down. I view,

0:21:28.640 --> 0:21:31.359
<v Speaker 6>in general for the economy overall it's kind of a muddy,

0:21:31.440 --> 0:21:34.399
<v Speaker 6>rainy economy. Our companies are actually doing quite well. The

0:21:34.480 --> 0:21:37.320
<v Speaker 6>thing that is different and new was the collapse of SVB,

0:21:38.320 --> 0:21:42.360
<v Speaker 6>And if you really lose confidence in the regional banking system,

0:21:42.440 --> 0:21:44.359
<v Speaker 6>that is a new type of threat. That was a

0:21:44.400 --> 0:21:47.760
<v Speaker 6>worrisome weekend. It seems like that's quieting down. Yeah, and

0:21:47.880 --> 0:21:50.320
<v Speaker 6>real estate is under a lot of strain because COVID

0:21:50.320 --> 0:21:52.720
<v Speaker 6>may have just changed the way people use their offices.

0:21:53.400 --> 0:21:55.840
<v Speaker 6>But in the regular world, you know, we owned forty

0:21:55.840 --> 0:21:58.679
<v Speaker 6>companies and all sorts of industries, and we did well

0:21:58.800 --> 0:22:00.679
<v Speaker 6>last year and have good budgets for this year. So

0:22:01.200 --> 0:22:04.359
<v Speaker 6>the actual economy I think is doing, you know, is

0:22:04.440 --> 0:22:05.040
<v Speaker 6>muddling along.

0:22:05.200 --> 0:22:07.760
<v Speaker 2>Any stress points that you're seeing among your portfolio.

0:22:08.400 --> 0:22:11.560
<v Speaker 6>Our portfolio, Lockwood is doing quite well, So we don't

0:22:12.040 --> 0:22:14.440
<v Speaker 6>you know, there's always industries that are growing faster than others.

0:22:14.480 --> 0:22:17.600
<v Speaker 6>But if you're not over levered, if you can pass

0:22:17.640 --> 0:22:20.200
<v Speaker 6>through price and you have good market position, I think,

0:22:20.280 --> 0:22:22.600
<v Speaker 6>you know, defaults been almost zero in private equity. I

0:22:22.600 --> 0:22:24.440
<v Speaker 6>think there's still going to be quite low relative for

0:22:24.480 --> 0:22:27.439
<v Speaker 6>the return is generated. Yeah, and feeling good about our

0:22:27.440 --> 0:22:28.000
<v Speaker 6>own firm, So.

0:22:28.440 --> 0:22:30.840
<v Speaker 2>What about putting new money to work. You know, where's

0:22:30.840 --> 0:22:31.800
<v Speaker 2>the areas of interest.

0:22:32.920 --> 0:22:34.879
<v Speaker 6>My firm, a particular, is state active. So in the

0:22:34.960 --> 0:22:37.960
<v Speaker 6>last month, we sold a company called Signify for eight billion.

0:22:38.480 --> 0:22:40.280
<v Speaker 6>We bought a big piece of Perkin Elmer in the

0:22:40.320 --> 0:22:42.919
<v Speaker 6>last sixty days for two billions, so we're both buying

0:22:42.960 --> 0:22:46.560
<v Speaker 6>and selling. Right, you have to be much more proactive.

0:22:46.560 --> 0:22:48.679
<v Speaker 6>There's a long list of companies that would like to

0:22:48.720 --> 0:22:51.800
<v Speaker 6>sell that are not announcing there for sale until they

0:22:51.800 --> 0:22:54.520
<v Speaker 6>know where prices are in the market settles. But that

0:22:54.600 --> 0:22:57.520
<v Speaker 6>leaves the opportunity to approach them proactively and make a

0:22:57.600 --> 0:23:00.240
<v Speaker 6>one off negotiations. And you are and we've been doing

0:23:00.280 --> 0:23:03.000
<v Speaker 6>that because we know what industries we like. We track

0:23:03.119 --> 0:23:05.879
<v Speaker 6>these businesses. We only use about four times debt to

0:23:05.920 --> 0:23:08.480
<v Speaker 6>EBITDANA average, so we can fully finance what we want

0:23:08.520 --> 0:23:11.000
<v Speaker 6>to do. So we're just being more proactive. We have

0:23:11.040 --> 0:23:13.240
<v Speaker 6>another company we haven't announced that we just signed a

0:23:13.240 --> 0:23:16.399
<v Speaker 6>contract on and so we're quite busy. But we're a

0:23:16.440 --> 0:23:17.880
<v Speaker 6>little bit different than the average front.

0:23:18.000 --> 0:23:19.919
<v Speaker 2>How much of a price reset is there going on

0:23:19.960 --> 0:23:21.800
<v Speaker 2>in terms of valuations.

0:23:21.320 --> 0:23:23.520
<v Speaker 6>You know, it comes in gradually and it's you know,

0:23:23.600 --> 0:23:26.280
<v Speaker 6>if I had a guess and I've had some investment

0:23:26.320 --> 0:23:29.000
<v Speaker 6>banker friends kind of confirmed this. If something was ten,

0:23:29.040 --> 0:23:31.399
<v Speaker 6>it's probably going to be eight. If something was twelve,

0:23:31.400 --> 0:23:32.320
<v Speaker 6>it's probably going to be ten.

0:23:32.400 --> 0:23:33.280
<v Speaker 2>It's not a huge ten.

0:23:33.560 --> 0:23:35.480
<v Speaker 6>It's not a you know, I'm not talking about the

0:23:35.560 --> 0:23:38.160
<v Speaker 6>unicorn stocks that had no revenue, no earnings and were

0:23:38.160 --> 0:23:40.840
<v Speaker 6>worth eighty billion. Those are that's a totally different market.

0:23:41.160 --> 0:23:43.800
<v Speaker 6>Companies that were being sold off of their earnings power,

0:23:44.400 --> 0:23:46.680
<v Speaker 6>I think will be a couple multiple points less than

0:23:46.680 --> 0:23:49.240
<v Speaker 6>they were. So it is a good buyer's market. It's

0:23:49.240 --> 0:23:51.719
<v Speaker 6>more expensive to borrow, but you're getting a lower price,

0:23:51.880 --> 0:23:55.720
<v Speaker 6>so net that's a positive for the buyer. But it's

0:23:55.720 --> 0:23:58.520
<v Speaker 6>not again a cataclysm like oh seven or eight was

0:23:58.600 --> 0:23:59.840
<v Speaker 6>much scarier for the economy.

0:24:00.040 --> 0:24:04.159
<v Speaker 2>We're all right, right, it's interesting. Well, so when you

0:24:05.000 --> 0:24:08.240
<v Speaker 2>I'm thinking about the bank situation, you know, and you

0:24:08.240 --> 0:24:10.120
<v Speaker 2>know here we are, it does feel like we keep going,

0:24:10.119 --> 0:24:12.359
<v Speaker 2>it's not a bank crisis, crisis of a few banks.

0:24:12.560 --> 0:24:14.800
<v Speaker 2>You agree with that or is it hard to tell?

0:24:15.000 --> 0:24:18.800
<v Speaker 6>I hope that's the case. Yeah, everything, I see, that's

0:24:18.840 --> 0:24:22.440
<v Speaker 6>the case. You know, And when I talked to various

0:24:22.640 --> 0:24:26.080
<v Speaker 6>parties or either politicians on the financial committees or you

0:24:26.119 --> 0:24:27.800
<v Speaker 6>just talk to people in general. I think there's a

0:24:27.880 --> 0:24:31.480
<v Speaker 6>natural friction that's slowed down. It could have been a

0:24:31.520 --> 0:24:35.240
<v Speaker 6>whole run on the banking system following the SVB weekend.

0:24:35.800 --> 0:24:38.040
<v Speaker 6>It feels like it's slowed down. You know, obviously there

0:24:38.080 --> 0:24:40.680
<v Speaker 6>was the big news over the weekend, but it doesn't

0:24:40.680 --> 0:24:43.240
<v Speaker 6>feel like it's the beginning of a giant blossom of panic.

0:24:43.320 --> 0:24:45.600
<v Speaker 6>It feels like it's kind of slowed down. Now. The

0:24:45.640 --> 0:24:49.439
<v Speaker 6>whole regional banking industry may be less profitable, could be

0:24:49.480 --> 0:24:52.359
<v Speaker 6>a long term constraint on the availability to debt for

0:24:52.440 --> 0:24:54.560
<v Speaker 6>smaller companies. So I'm not saying it's over, but it

0:24:54.600 --> 0:24:58.080
<v Speaker 6>doesn't feel like it's a it's a panic about to start.

0:24:58.280 --> 0:25:00.560
<v Speaker 2>Are you finding on the predit crisis? Credit a private

0:25:00.600 --> 0:25:02.240
<v Speaker 2>credit side of things? This is what happens when you

0:25:02.240 --> 0:25:04.480
<v Speaker 2>get four hours to sleep, the private credit side of things.

0:25:05.160 --> 0:25:08.480
<v Speaker 2>What are the differences following the collapse of Silicon Valley

0:25:08.280 --> 0:25:09.960
<v Speaker 2>and the two other regionals.

0:25:10.000 --> 0:25:12.680
<v Speaker 6>Well, it's not just so that the whole non bank

0:25:12.800 --> 0:25:14.520
<v Speaker 6>lending market, of which we're a part of we have

0:25:14.640 --> 0:25:16.880
<v Speaker 6>a ten billion dollar credit arm has been a It's

0:25:16.920 --> 0:25:20.440
<v Speaker 6>a great place to be because we were always lending

0:25:20.600 --> 0:25:23.080
<v Speaker 6>floating rate, so as rates went up, we actually make

0:25:23.119 --> 0:25:27.400
<v Speaker 6>more on the loans, you know, we're more. I think

0:25:27.400 --> 0:25:29.320
<v Speaker 6>it's one of the things that has kept the economy going.

0:25:29.359 --> 0:25:32.959
<v Speaker 6>It's this whole non bank lending market and it's and

0:25:33.000 --> 0:25:35.200
<v Speaker 6>the default rates have been very low. The thing also

0:25:35.200 --> 0:25:37.520
<v Speaker 6>people don't realize is how much equity is in these

0:25:37.560 --> 0:25:40.879
<v Speaker 6>deals now. So like in our companies, we're usually under

0:25:40.920 --> 0:25:44.479
<v Speaker 6>forty percent loan to value. Okay, a normal buyout these

0:25:44.560 --> 0:25:47.520
<v Speaker 6>days maybe half equity half debt. It's not like nine

0:25:47.560 --> 0:25:49.760
<v Speaker 6>parts debt one part equity the way it was thirty five.

0:25:49.880 --> 0:25:51.920
<v Speaker 2>Is that where the default rates are lower in your

0:25:52.000 --> 0:25:54.639
<v Speaker 2>because because you know some of the criticisms about the

0:25:54.760 --> 0:25:58.040
<v Speaker 2>shadow bank. Yeah, yeah, well you know that there's not transparency,

0:25:58.080 --> 0:26:00.359
<v Speaker 2>a little concerned about you know, what is actually going

0:26:00.400 --> 0:26:04.359
<v Speaker 2>on there. The flip side is that when funding is tight,

0:26:04.480 --> 0:26:05.719
<v Speaker 2>this is another alternative.

0:26:05.920 --> 0:26:08.480
<v Speaker 6>Yeah. I think there's a lot more transparency than people say.

0:26:08.520 --> 0:26:10.840
<v Speaker 6>For example, we have a publicly traded aren't called New

0:26:10.840 --> 0:26:15.240
<v Speaker 6>Mountain Finance Company. It's sec reported. We do our earnings calls.

0:26:15.280 --> 0:26:17.880
<v Speaker 6>We actually kind of go position by position, how what's

0:26:17.920 --> 0:26:20.879
<v Speaker 6>the multiple to EBITD and how has it changed. So

0:26:21.040 --> 0:26:23.120
<v Speaker 6>and other people are transparent as well. So I don't

0:26:23.160 --> 0:26:25.879
<v Speaker 6>think it's that lack of transparent. Yeah, if you remember,

0:26:26.000 --> 0:26:29.920
<v Speaker 6>the non bank lenders like we are are much less

0:26:30.000 --> 0:26:32.560
<v Speaker 6>leverate than banks are. A bank with ten percent equity

0:26:32.600 --> 0:26:36.120
<v Speaker 6>means it's nine parts debt to one part equity. BDC's

0:26:36.200 --> 0:26:38.199
<v Speaker 6>like we have are more one to one, are one

0:26:38.280 --> 0:26:40.960
<v Speaker 6>point two to one. And the people we're lending to

0:26:41.680 --> 0:26:44.680
<v Speaker 6>have much more equity than they used to in years ago.

0:26:44.880 --> 0:26:47.240
<v Speaker 6>And let's say you lend to a software company with

0:26:47.320 --> 0:26:49.960
<v Speaker 6>seven hundred million of equity and three hundred to debt

0:26:50.280 --> 0:26:52.800
<v Speaker 6>and interest rates go up by twenty million. They're not

0:26:52.840 --> 0:26:55.520
<v Speaker 6>going to throw away their seven hundred million because you know,

0:26:55.520 --> 0:26:57.760
<v Speaker 6>they'll put an extra money or bringing some equity. So

0:26:58.000 --> 0:27:00.600
<v Speaker 6>it's very different than the nineteen eighty one deals when

0:27:00.640 --> 0:27:03.679
<v Speaker 6>I started, or you know, it's not Gibson greeting cards,

0:27:03.960 --> 0:27:06.560
<v Speaker 6>you know, revelunt or stuff. It's a very different world now.

0:27:06.600 --> 0:27:09.000
<v Speaker 2>You know, eighteen months ago Bloomberg was writing stories about

0:27:09.000 --> 0:27:12.040
<v Speaker 2>record deals, direct deals, and the private credit market. What's

0:27:12.080 --> 0:27:14.399
<v Speaker 2>the headline from your perspective when it comes to private

0:27:14.440 --> 0:27:17.160
<v Speaker 2>credit in six months or twelve months, are you get

0:27:17.200 --> 0:27:18.440
<v Speaker 2>back back to record deals?

0:27:18.640 --> 0:27:20.440
<v Speaker 6>I don't think it's going to be record deals. Yeah,

0:27:20.640 --> 0:27:23.479
<v Speaker 6>but I think I think you'll see deal flow has

0:27:23.520 --> 0:27:27.520
<v Speaker 6>picked up. The non bank lenders are are are active

0:27:27.560 --> 0:27:31.119
<v Speaker 6>and engaged. And you know what's interesting is again there

0:27:31.200 --> 0:27:33.240
<v Speaker 6>was just a software deal done by a big private

0:27:33.240 --> 0:27:36.320
<v Speaker 6>equity firm. It's a thirteen billion dollar deal. Twelve billion

0:27:36.320 --> 0:27:37.720
<v Speaker 6>of equity, one billion of debt.

0:27:37.880 --> 0:27:40.080
<v Speaker 2>Wow, so no debt almost.

0:27:39.920 --> 0:27:42.119
<v Speaker 6>Almost no debt. So it's pretty attractive I think to

0:27:42.160 --> 0:27:43.760
<v Speaker 6>be in the debt. I mean, even if the twelve

0:27:43.760 --> 0:27:45.800
<v Speaker 6>even if they make a big mistake on their twelve billion,

0:27:45.880 --> 0:27:47.920
<v Speaker 6>you're pretty safe at the debt level. And so that's

0:27:47.960 --> 0:27:51.000
<v Speaker 6>an extreme version of but that's that's kind of symbolica

0:27:51.040 --> 0:27:51.760
<v Speaker 6>what's been happening.

0:27:51.800 --> 0:27:54.560
<v Speaker 2>What do you think could be the big surprise on

0:27:54.600 --> 0:27:56.200
<v Speaker 2>the downside in this environment?

0:27:56.400 --> 0:27:58.720
<v Speaker 6>Well, so the two things I worry the most about.

0:27:58.800 --> 0:28:00.800
<v Speaker 6>I feel good about private equity as a feel I

0:28:00.840 --> 0:28:03.240
<v Speaker 6>feel good about non back lending. You know, the big

0:28:03.280 --> 0:28:05.960
<v Speaker 6>things that would be to the negative would be real

0:28:06.080 --> 0:28:09.840
<v Speaker 6>estate hurting the regional banks which goes through Main Street America.

0:28:10.280 --> 0:28:13.120
<v Speaker 6>And I am worried about the interest rates on federal debt.

0:28:13.240 --> 0:28:15.760
<v Speaker 6>I mean, you know this, I think the government overstimulated.

0:28:15.800 --> 0:28:19.400
<v Speaker 6>The FED had to respond, and we have thirty trillion

0:28:19.440 --> 0:28:21.679
<v Speaker 6>of debts, So if it goes up by two percent

0:28:21.720 --> 0:28:23.920
<v Speaker 6>on the interest rate, that's six hundred billion, and that's

0:28:23.920 --> 0:28:27.560
<v Speaker 6>almost our defense budget. So I worry about you know,

0:28:27.680 --> 0:28:31.879
<v Speaker 6>government errors, government borrowing, and and I don't know. I

0:28:32.080 --> 0:28:33.639
<v Speaker 6>don't know how bad the real estate's going to be.

0:28:33.680 --> 0:28:35.840
<v Speaker 6>It doesn't feel like it's going to be cosmically bad,

0:28:35.880 --> 0:28:37.120
<v Speaker 6>but that's a big watch.

0:28:36.960 --> 0:28:38.560
<v Speaker 2>Up when it comes to real estate. Do you think

0:28:38.560 --> 0:28:40.960
<v Speaker 2>it's in more like the middle market and not the

0:28:40.960 --> 0:28:41.480
<v Speaker 2>big guys.

0:28:42.080 --> 0:28:46.000
<v Speaker 6>I think it's in the office building space. And I

0:28:46.000 --> 0:28:47.960
<v Speaker 6>guess retail has been bad in the malls for a

0:28:48.000 --> 0:28:50.880
<v Speaker 6>long time. We have a net lease arm where we're lending.

0:28:51.360 --> 0:28:53.720
<v Speaker 6>You know, the a company has a must have facility

0:28:53.720 --> 0:28:56.480
<v Speaker 6>they would keep even if they went bankrupt, and it's

0:28:56.520 --> 0:28:58.680
<v Speaker 6>worth you know, it has value itself. I'm not worried

0:28:58.720 --> 0:29:00.320
<v Speaker 6>about that part of the market. But I mean, I

0:29:00.320 --> 0:29:02.880
<v Speaker 6>don't know. With office buildings in New York, yeah, what

0:29:02.960 --> 0:29:05.040
<v Speaker 6>the vacancies are going to be. And they're more highly

0:29:05.080 --> 0:29:12.920
<v Speaker 6>levered than a lot of things. But still it has

0:29:12.920 --> 0:29:15.400
<v Speaker 6>been outputing every other asset class for a long time.

0:29:16.160 --> 0:29:17.880
<v Speaker 6>I feel good about my own firm. I think what

0:29:17.960 --> 0:29:19.920
<v Speaker 6>I hear with in general is the beta is about

0:29:20.000 --> 0:29:22.400
<v Speaker 6>half as much as the stock market. So yeah, I

0:29:22.400 --> 0:29:24.600
<v Speaker 6>don't think there's some crisis about to happen in private equity.

0:29:24.760 --> 0:29:28.560
<v Speaker 2>Just have about twenty seconds left here. So environment better

0:29:28.600 --> 0:29:32.600
<v Speaker 2>than a year ago.

0:29:30.920 --> 0:29:33.600
<v Speaker 6>Similar than a York I think, I think kind of

0:29:33.640 --> 0:29:36.239
<v Speaker 6>similar but getting better as inflation gets under. I think

0:29:36.280 --> 0:29:38.080
<v Speaker 6>the FED has to stop at some point and then

0:29:38.120 --> 0:29:38.760
<v Speaker 6>it will get better.

0:29:38.880 --> 0:29:40.880
<v Speaker 2>All right, I'm going to think the FED stops after

0:29:40.960 --> 0:29:41.720
<v Speaker 2>this meeting.

0:29:41.560 --> 0:29:42.239
<v Speaker 6>Or who knows who.

0:29:43.200 --> 0:29:45.720
<v Speaker 2>I feel like it's the great debate, depending on go

0:29:45.880 --> 0:29:48.520
<v Speaker 2>find out. Thank you so much. But optimism because you

0:29:48.520 --> 0:29:49.200
<v Speaker 2>guys are doing well.

0:29:49.280 --> 0:29:50.760
<v Speaker 6>Yeah, I feel good. Thank you very much.

0:29:50.760 --> 0:29:53.000
<v Speaker 2>All right, Steve. Always appreciate Steve Klinsky. He's founder and

0:29:53.080 --> 0:29:54.920
<v Speaker 2>CEO of the Private Equity and Credit for a New

0:29:54.920 --> 0:29:58.320
<v Speaker 2>Mountain Capital. Joining us here at Milkin. You are listening

0:29:58.360 --> 0:30:01.400
<v Speaker 2>and watching Bloomberg Business Week. We are live on YouTube,

0:30:01.400 --> 0:30:04.640
<v Speaker 2>Bloomberg Originals and of course on Bloomberg Radio.

0:30:05.680 --> 0:30:09.760
<v Speaker 3>Bloommarc A Journal.

0:30:10.800 --> 0:30:11.760
<v Speaker 2>How about you let me drive?

0:30:12.280 --> 0:30:16.200
<v Speaker 3>No, no, no, no, who's going to drug honey? Please? How

0:30:16.240 --> 0:30:17.360
<v Speaker 3>do the riding gravel?

0:30:17.920 --> 0:30:19.280
<v Speaker 5>Let's mate, I want to drive.

0:30:21.560 --> 0:30:22.440
<v Speaker 2>It's a good question.

0:30:22.920 --> 0:30:28.880
<v Speaker 6>Good this is the drive to the clothes.

0:30:28.400 --> 0:30:29.200
<v Speaker 3>Dot com for me.

0:30:29.240 --> 0:30:30.520
<v Speaker 2>I think we'll buy around.

0:30:30.920 --> 0:30:33.320
<v Speaker 6>On Bloomberg Radio blue radios.

0:30:33.320 --> 0:30:34.920
<v Speaker 4>On those you never really get a picture yourself.

0:30:34.960 --> 0:30:37.440
<v Speaker 2>On the radio, you can hear our next guest. Let's

0:30:37.480 --> 0:30:39.240
<v Speaker 2>get to it. It's time for the drive for the clothes.

0:30:39.280 --> 0:30:41.440
<v Speaker 2>You've got a bet seventeen and a half minutes left

0:30:42.120 --> 0:30:44.760
<v Speaker 2>in the trading session, and we are definitely off our

0:30:44.800 --> 0:30:46.560
<v Speaker 2>best levels of the session. It's kind of a myth day,

0:30:46.600 --> 0:30:49.000
<v Speaker 2>and it does feel like we've moved from the bank crisis,

0:30:49.640 --> 0:30:52.160
<v Speaker 2>if you will, and then moved to maybe focus on

0:30:52.240 --> 0:30:54.120
<v Speaker 2>the FED. Sarah Malick is with us, back with us,

0:30:54.160 --> 0:30:57.440
<v Speaker 2>chief investment Officer of New Bean UH and here at Milkin.

0:30:58.360 --> 0:31:01.480
<v Speaker 2>How are you great? I love being here. Oh thanks

0:31:01.520 --> 0:31:04.160
<v Speaker 2>for having me, Well, we love having you here. How

0:31:04.200 --> 0:31:05.800
<v Speaker 2>would you describe this environment right now?

0:31:06.040 --> 0:31:08.160
<v Speaker 4>I think the market's concerned about two things right now.

0:31:08.320 --> 0:31:11.000
<v Speaker 4>Number one is coming up this week it's the FOMC meeting,

0:31:11.040 --> 0:31:13.120
<v Speaker 4>and number two is coming up soon, which is the

0:31:13.160 --> 0:31:15.880
<v Speaker 4>debt sealing issue. So starting with the one coming up,

0:31:16.040 --> 0:31:17.240
<v Speaker 4>the FOMC meeting, I.

0:31:17.240 --> 0:31:19.520
<v Speaker 2>Think the FED is one and done. But then I

0:31:19.560 --> 0:31:21.160
<v Speaker 2>think we're going to have a really long pause.

0:31:21.240 --> 0:31:23.160
<v Speaker 4>So we disagree with some of the market views that

0:31:23.240 --> 0:31:25.800
<v Speaker 4>the FED may soon cut because inflation is going to

0:31:25.880 --> 0:31:28.320
<v Speaker 4>remain sticky and so not this year. I don't see

0:31:28.360 --> 0:31:30.200
<v Speaker 4>it this year, even if we do hit a recession,

0:31:30.280 --> 0:31:32.400
<v Speaker 4>I don't see rate cuts on the table for this

0:31:32.560 --> 0:31:35.040
<v Speaker 4>year because I think inflation is still very far from

0:31:35.080 --> 0:31:37.160
<v Speaker 4>the FED stated two percent target and it's going to

0:31:37.240 --> 0:31:39.560
<v Speaker 4>take quite a while for inflation to get to that level.

0:31:39.640 --> 0:31:41.560
<v Speaker 2>What's the problems with that? And I just think about,

0:31:41.680 --> 0:31:44.200
<v Speaker 2>you know, valuation resets. It's the constant debate that we

0:31:44.320 --> 0:31:46.120
<v Speaker 2>have here at Bloomberg at you know, if this is

0:31:46.200 --> 0:31:48.120
<v Speaker 2>the environment we're going to be in, you need to

0:31:48.200 --> 0:31:51.320
<v Speaker 2>rethink maybe the valuations that are out there. Do you agree?

0:31:51.840 --> 0:31:55.000
<v Speaker 4>I think valuations are pricing at a pretty optimistic scenario

0:31:55.120 --> 0:31:58.040
<v Speaker 4>for the S Andp's trading at a premium, and I

0:31:58.120 --> 0:32:00.440
<v Speaker 4>think that's optimistic given the downside you could see the

0:32:00.480 --> 0:32:02.840
<v Speaker 4>earnings going forward, because so take a.

0:32:02.800 --> 0:32:03.400
<v Speaker 2>Look at earnings.

0:32:03.400 --> 0:32:06.400
<v Speaker 4>Even though first quarter earning earnings have come in fine,

0:32:06.480 --> 0:32:09.080
<v Speaker 4>we were coming into that fairly negatively with higher than

0:32:09.160 --> 0:32:12.479
<v Speaker 4>usual cuts to consensus margins are an issue for companies

0:32:12.520 --> 0:32:13.400
<v Speaker 4>are being compressed.

0:32:13.720 --> 0:32:15.440
<v Speaker 2>Revenue growth has been positive, but.

0:32:15.600 --> 0:32:19.760
<v Speaker 4>It's it's basically significantly has pricing power in it rather

0:32:19.840 --> 0:32:20.760
<v Speaker 4>than volume growth.

0:32:20.960 --> 0:32:22.560
<v Speaker 2>And if inflation, inflation.

0:32:22.360 --> 0:32:24.000
<v Speaker 4>Is rolling over, so I think it's going to be

0:32:24.080 --> 0:32:26.920
<v Speaker 4>hard for companies to hold onto that pricing power. That's

0:32:26.960 --> 0:32:29.520
<v Speaker 4>another leg that will take earnings down and that I

0:32:29.600 --> 0:32:31.320
<v Speaker 4>think then at the S and P looks expensive.

0:32:31.480 --> 0:32:34.120
<v Speaker 2>You sound not optimistic, you sound pessimistic.

0:32:34.880 --> 0:32:38.160
<v Speaker 4>Well, I think there's still ways for realistic, there's still

0:32:38.200 --> 0:32:40.040
<v Speaker 4>ways for people to stay invested.

0:32:39.720 --> 0:32:41.560
<v Speaker 2>In the markets. Though, what's going to be the debt ceiling?

0:32:41.600 --> 0:32:43.200
<v Speaker 2>How do you see that scenario? I feel like here

0:32:43.360 --> 0:32:46.760
<v Speaker 2>we go again, like we've seen this movie several times before.

0:32:46.960 --> 0:32:49.640
<v Speaker 2>What are the how do you see it maybe playing out?

0:32:49.760 --> 0:32:51.840
<v Speaker 2>And the problems for investors in the markets.

0:32:52.240 --> 0:32:54.680
<v Speaker 4>So for the debt ceiling, you know, we're not seeing

0:32:54.680 --> 0:32:57.520
<v Speaker 4>the equities price in issues around the debt ceiling yet.

0:32:58.600 --> 0:33:00.840
<v Speaker 4>The timing of it depends on when axor seats may

0:33:00.920 --> 0:33:03.480
<v Speaker 4>come through, so they're coming in a little lower than usual,

0:33:03.600 --> 0:33:06.640
<v Speaker 4>So probably a June July debt ceiling deadline will run

0:33:06.720 --> 0:33:09.880
<v Speaker 4>into Credit spreads are starting starting to widen, so that's

0:33:10.920 --> 0:33:12.880
<v Speaker 4>credit spreads are starting to see an issue. Their equities

0:33:12.920 --> 0:33:15.400
<v Speaker 4>are not. You know, the issue would be if we

0:33:15.520 --> 0:33:18.160
<v Speaker 4>were to go past the debt ceiling deadline, you could

0:33:18.160 --> 0:33:20.720
<v Speaker 4>see downside equities of about ten to fifteen percent, which

0:33:20.760 --> 0:33:22.760
<v Speaker 4>is what we saw in twenty eleven when we got

0:33:22.800 --> 0:33:24.480
<v Speaker 4>to that point. So there is issues with the debt

0:33:24.560 --> 0:33:26.240
<v Speaker 4>ceiling out there if we can't come to a resolution,

0:33:26.520 --> 0:33:28.080
<v Speaker 4>and we're not getting close to one right now.

0:33:28.880 --> 0:33:31.000
<v Speaker 2>Haven't heard you talk about the bank sector. Are you

0:33:32.160 --> 0:33:35.040
<v Speaker 2>nervous that there's still another shoe to drop? Are we done?

0:33:35.680 --> 0:33:37.320
<v Speaker 2>How do you see it after what we got from

0:33:37.400 --> 0:33:40.400
<v Speaker 2>JP Morgan and First Republic over the weekend or this morning.

0:33:40.600 --> 0:33:42.840
<v Speaker 4>The banking sector is all about confidence, But the world

0:33:42.960 --> 0:33:44.880
<v Speaker 4>is different today than the bank runs that we saw,

0:33:45.320 --> 0:33:47.760
<v Speaker 4>you know, a decade plus ago. It's very digital, so

0:33:47.920 --> 0:33:50.120
<v Speaker 4>that kind of issue can happen at any time. It's

0:33:50.200 --> 0:33:51.840
<v Speaker 4>not where we all have to line up at the bank.

0:33:52.120 --> 0:33:54.360
<v Speaker 4>You know, we'reer to pull our money out, but bigger.

0:33:54.520 --> 0:33:56.560
<v Speaker 4>But I think, you know, the confidence was put back

0:33:56.600 --> 0:33:59.320
<v Speaker 4>in the sector today with JP Morgan buying First Republic,

0:33:59.440 --> 0:34:02.040
<v Speaker 4>so I think that gives us some stability. But generally

0:34:02.080 --> 0:34:05.480
<v Speaker 4>the banking system sector we see issues going forward, ranging

0:34:05.560 --> 0:34:10.279
<v Speaker 4>from net interest margin pressure, tighter regulations, tighter capital requirements,

0:34:10.480 --> 0:34:12.680
<v Speaker 4>and more competition for deposits. You know, we all have

0:34:12.800 --> 0:34:15.279
<v Speaker 4>our checking accounts and safest accounts that are really paying

0:34:15.320 --> 0:34:17.200
<v Speaker 4>low interest rates. Right now, I think that's going to

0:34:17.239 --> 0:34:19.600
<v Speaker 4>come to an end. Banks have to become more competitive.

0:34:19.800 --> 0:34:21.319
<v Speaker 4>That's not great for their profitability.

0:34:21.360 --> 0:34:23.680
<v Speaker 2>All right, So what's your advice to investors in this environment?

0:34:23.680 --> 0:34:25.400
<v Speaker 2>Because it does still feel like there's a lot of

0:34:25.480 --> 0:34:26.400
<v Speaker 2>things coming at us.

0:34:26.920 --> 0:34:29.640
<v Speaker 4>So when then equities are focusing on quality companies with

0:34:29.680 --> 0:34:32.040
<v Speaker 4>strong free cash flow, companies that tend to raise their

0:34:32.080 --> 0:34:35.440
<v Speaker 4>dividends over time. That's companies with strong fundamentals. Outside of

0:34:35.480 --> 0:34:37.680
<v Speaker 4>the US, emerging markets get a little bit more bang

0:34:37.760 --> 0:34:40.040
<v Speaker 4>for your buck. As we go into a recession, the

0:34:40.160 --> 0:34:43.279
<v Speaker 4>dollar likely weekends. That's good for emerging markets. China is

0:34:43.320 --> 0:34:47.480
<v Speaker 4>continuing to reopen. And then we outside of equity fixed income,

0:34:47.560 --> 0:34:49.520
<v Speaker 4>a lot of the pain is priced into fixed income.

0:34:49.600 --> 0:34:53.080
<v Speaker 4>With one more FED rate hike on the table, Areas

0:34:53.080 --> 0:34:56.040
<v Speaker 4>such as high quality, high yield double B rated corporates

0:34:56.040 --> 0:34:58.080
<v Speaker 4>are paying high single digit total return.

0:34:58.360 --> 0:34:59.160
<v Speaker 3>That's almost that's.

0:34:59.000 --> 0:35:02.000
<v Speaker 4>Equity like return in fixed income. And then look outside

0:35:02.000 --> 0:35:04.880
<v Speaker 4>of public markets, to real assets. Private credit tends to

0:35:04.960 --> 0:35:08.439
<v Speaker 4>be more resilient in an economic downturn, and infrastructure tends

0:35:08.480 --> 0:35:09.640
<v Speaker 4>to be recession resilience.

0:35:09.680 --> 0:35:11.680
<v Speaker 2>This is another two areas that we do, Like, what's

0:35:11.719 --> 0:35:13.880
<v Speaker 2>the biggest thing that's a risk to kind of the

0:35:14.000 --> 0:35:14.680
<v Speaker 2>thinking today?

0:35:14.920 --> 0:35:15.080
<v Speaker 4>Is it?

0:35:15.360 --> 0:35:16.120
<v Speaker 2>I don't know what is it?

0:35:16.360 --> 0:35:16.480
<v Speaker 3>Is it?

0:35:16.640 --> 0:35:18.239
<v Speaker 2>I feel like we we've kind of figured out what

0:35:18.280 --> 0:35:19.719
<v Speaker 2>the Fed's going to do, but what is it when

0:35:19.760 --> 0:35:22.080
<v Speaker 2>you look at the possible things that could kind of

0:35:22.200 --> 0:35:23.480
<v Speaker 2>change your perspective right now?

0:35:24.040 --> 0:35:28.000
<v Speaker 4>I think partly it's people tend to rely on recency bias, so.

0:35:28.080 --> 0:35:31.080
<v Speaker 2>We think back Ashton Kutcher tour right, I'm hearing. I'm

0:35:31.120 --> 0:35:33.360
<v Speaker 2>just going to tell everybody because that's what we do

0:35:33.440 --> 0:35:36.320
<v Speaker 2>at Milkin. Sorry anyway, so you go ahead, go ahead,

0:35:36.760 --> 0:35:39.960
<v Speaker 2>But I digress. You can't invest in Ashton, although he

0:35:40.080 --> 0:35:41.520
<v Speaker 2>does invest So anyway, go ahead.

0:35:41.840 --> 0:35:42.120
<v Speaker 1>Sorry.

0:35:42.719 --> 0:35:45.640
<v Speaker 4>So recency bias does exist. So I think a lot

0:35:45.640 --> 0:35:47.239
<v Speaker 4>of people look at the world they think of the

0:35:47.520 --> 0:35:50.359
<v Speaker 4>POSTGFC of our interest rates were on average FED month

0:35:50.440 --> 0:35:52.839
<v Speaker 4>funds rate under one percent. But if you look at

0:35:52.880 --> 0:35:55.920
<v Speaker 4>the about fifty year period pre the Global Financial Crisis,

0:35:56.160 --> 0:35:58.640
<v Speaker 4>FED funds rates were on average almost six percent.

0:35:58.840 --> 0:36:01.359
<v Speaker 2>Right, I think, why why is it so bored? Why

0:36:01.400 --> 0:36:04.440
<v Speaker 2>is it difficult? Is it just people can't understand it.

0:36:04.560 --> 0:36:07.759
<v Speaker 2>There's a generation that doesn't understand that that's the way

0:36:07.800 --> 0:36:09.040
<v Speaker 2>it usually is.

0:36:09.800 --> 0:36:11.400
<v Speaker 4>I think a lot of people spent most of their

0:36:11.480 --> 0:36:14.359
<v Speaker 4>careers in this kind of environment. A lot of people

0:36:14.520 --> 0:36:16.400
<v Speaker 4>even most of their lives in this kind of environment.

0:36:16.440 --> 0:36:18.080
<v Speaker 4>And that's kind of like, you know, the psychology of

0:36:18.120 --> 0:36:20.480
<v Speaker 4>recency bias, where you rely on what you know and

0:36:20.560 --> 0:36:22.239
<v Speaker 4>you don't maybe don't think about the fact that the

0:36:22.320 --> 0:36:25.319
<v Speaker 4>normal world was what was free GFC. I think that's

0:36:25.320 --> 0:36:27.080
<v Speaker 4>what we're going to and that's kind of implications for

0:36:27.200 --> 0:36:28.360
<v Speaker 4>more than just the banking sector.

0:36:28.360 --> 0:36:30.640
<v Speaker 2>All right, this was in my notes for you, and

0:36:30.760 --> 0:36:32.720
<v Speaker 2>so I want to go there. But the semiconductor space,

0:36:32.840 --> 0:36:34.440
<v Speaker 2>I love watching it. I feel like it's such a

0:36:34.480 --> 0:36:37.520
<v Speaker 2>great indicator of the economy. Mind you, it's a cyclical space,

0:36:37.560 --> 0:36:39.400
<v Speaker 2>and we have to understand that what is it that

0:36:39.440 --> 0:36:40.560
<v Speaker 2>you're watching specifically.

0:36:40.960 --> 0:36:43.360
<v Speaker 4>So we came into this year with our outlook that

0:36:43.400 --> 0:36:45.279
<v Speaker 4>we do for Barons and said technology was our top

0:36:45.360 --> 0:36:48.400
<v Speaker 4>pick for the year, Software and semiconductors. Now, we like

0:36:48.440 --> 0:36:51.000
<v Speaker 4>semiconductors for the long term. However, they're of almost twenty

0:36:51.040 --> 0:36:54.279
<v Speaker 4>percent year to date. A typical semiconductor downturn last six

0:36:54.360 --> 0:36:56.319
<v Speaker 4>to nine months, this one has taken ten. I think

0:36:56.360 --> 0:36:58.680
<v Speaker 4>the stocks got a little bit ahead of themselves, thinking

0:36:58.719 --> 0:37:00.640
<v Speaker 4>we were going to hit the inflection point at the bottom,

0:37:00.840 --> 0:37:03.640
<v Speaker 4>but we are going to hit it. Auto semiconductors like NXP,

0:37:03.760 --> 0:37:06.600
<v Speaker 4>which reports after the close today, is an area with

0:37:06.880 --> 0:37:10.239
<v Speaker 4>tailwinds like electric vehicles and self driving cars. I think

0:37:10.280 --> 0:37:12.000
<v Speaker 4>that the demand for semi's is going to come back.

0:37:12.040 --> 0:37:13.839
<v Speaker 4>Stocks take a bit of a breather, but then it's

0:37:13.880 --> 0:37:15.319
<v Speaker 4>off to the races that they hit as they hit

0:37:15.360 --> 0:37:17.040
<v Speaker 4>that inflection point on the bottom of the cycle.

0:37:17.600 --> 0:37:20.600
<v Speaker 2>Just have Sarah, about thirty seconds left here, twenty five seconds.

0:37:20.640 --> 0:37:24.200
<v Speaker 2>When you look out with confidence, what do you feel

0:37:24.200 --> 0:37:26.680
<v Speaker 2>comfortable talking about six months from now, twelve months from now,

0:37:27.400 --> 0:37:28.200
<v Speaker 2>two months from now.

0:37:28.960 --> 0:37:30.799
<v Speaker 4>I think I'm more worried about the next few months

0:37:30.840 --> 0:37:32.680
<v Speaker 4>because of the decks ceiling. Very hard to predict that.

0:37:32.960 --> 0:37:34.640
<v Speaker 4>I do think in the next six to twelve months

0:37:34.719 --> 0:37:37.160
<v Speaker 4>we're going to likely see some kind of mild recession

0:37:37.200 --> 0:37:39.520
<v Speaker 4>and that will clear the decks, clear the decks on earnings.

0:37:39.560 --> 0:37:41.560
<v Speaker 4>When you look at first quarter twenty twenty four, earnings

0:37:41.719 --> 0:37:43.800
<v Speaker 4>comps are fairly easy, so I think that's where everything

0:37:43.880 --> 0:37:46.480
<v Speaker 4>starts becoming easier in terms of what companies are reporting.

0:37:46.520 --> 0:37:48.279
<v Speaker 2>All right, well, this was so much fun you and

0:37:48.440 --> 0:37:50.600
<v Speaker 2>Ashton Kutscher. Who could have thought? Who would have thought?

0:37:51.200 --> 0:37:53.400
<v Speaker 2>Thank you so much, Thanks for having me really appreciate it.

0:37:53.400 --> 0:37:56.239
<v Speaker 2>Sarah Mallick of course, the CIO, Chief Investment Officer of

0:37:56.320 --> 0:37:58.680
<v Speaker 2>New Being joining us here at Milkin. You are listening

0:37:58.800 --> 0:38:02.560
<v Speaker 2>and watching Bloomberg Business Week. We are live in Beverly

0:38:02.680 --> 0:38:06.960
<v Speaker 2>Hills on radio, on YouTube, on Bloomberg Originals. This is Bloomberg.

0:38:08.040 --> 0:38:12.640
<v Speaker 1>This is the Bloomberg Business Week podcast, available on Apple, Spotify,

0:38:12.840 --> 0:38:16.520
<v Speaker 1>and anywhere else you get your podcast. Listen live weekday

0:38:16.520 --> 0:38:20.000
<v Speaker 1>afternoons from three to six Eastern on Bloomberg dot Com,

0:38:20.200 --> 0:38:23.480
<v Speaker 1>the iHeartRadio app, tune In, and the Bloomberg Business App.

0:38:23.600 --> 0:38:26.520
<v Speaker 1>You can also watch us live every weekday on YouTube

0:38:26.760 --> 0:38:29.000
<v Speaker 1>and always on the Bloomberg journalone