WEBVTT - Strauss Zelnick: “Doing something from scratch, that’s challenging.”

0:00:03.080 --> 0:00:07.480
<v Speaker 1>You're listening to Math and Magic, a production of iHeart Podcasts.

0:00:08.880 --> 0:00:10.520
<v Speaker 2>What drove me was not like, oh, I need to

0:00:10.520 --> 0:00:12.000
<v Speaker 2>make a whole lot of dope, and that was never

0:00:12.160 --> 0:00:14.400
<v Speaker 2>motivating for me, and I did well in working for

0:00:14.440 --> 0:00:17.479
<v Speaker 2>other people. But here's the truth. How hard can it

0:00:17.520 --> 0:00:19.720
<v Speaker 2>be when someone hands you a business card that says

0:00:19.760 --> 0:00:24.280
<v Speaker 2>president of twentieth century Fox doing something totally from scratch,

0:00:24.440 --> 0:00:28.280
<v Speaker 2>Like totally from scratch. That's challenging and that'll be a

0:00:28.320 --> 0:00:28.920
<v Speaker 2>real test.

0:00:33.120 --> 0:00:33.239
<v Speaker 1>Hi.

0:00:33.240 --> 0:00:36.080
<v Speaker 3>I'm Bob Pittman, and welcome to Math and Magic. Today.

0:00:36.080 --> 0:00:38.199
<v Speaker 3>We have someone who has built a career and a

0:00:38.280 --> 0:00:41.199
<v Speaker 3>life by excelling at both. He manages to find the

0:00:41.240 --> 0:00:43.960
<v Speaker 3>next creative spark and nurtured well and at the same

0:00:44.000 --> 0:00:47.080
<v Speaker 3>time put a strong business foundation under it, whether it

0:00:47.120 --> 0:00:50.080
<v Speaker 3>be large or small businesses, or cutting edge or traditional.

0:00:50.400 --> 0:00:52.600
<v Speaker 3>He wears a number of hats, but his two main

0:00:52.640 --> 0:00:55.840
<v Speaker 3>ones are as chairman and CEO of Take two Interactive Software,

0:00:56.000 --> 0:00:58.960
<v Speaker 3>the publisher of Grand Theft Auto, and as an astute

0:00:59.040 --> 0:01:02.920
<v Speaker 3>and successful inventster best known for Zelnik Media Capital, his

0:01:03.000 --> 0:01:06.880
<v Speaker 3>private equity firm focused on media and technology investments, and

0:01:07.160 --> 0:01:10.480
<v Speaker 3>he is a longtime friend. He's Straus Selnik. Strauss had

0:01:10.520 --> 0:01:13.920
<v Speaker 3>business success at an early age and has an incredible resume.

0:01:14.240 --> 0:01:16.720
<v Speaker 3>Let me give you a few examples. In the eighties,

0:01:16.760 --> 0:01:19.720
<v Speaker 3>he was president and Chief Operating officer of twentieth Century Fox,

0:01:20.000 --> 0:01:23.360
<v Speaker 3>and had been president and COO of Vestron Video back

0:01:23.400 --> 0:01:26.959
<v Speaker 3>when Vestron was the dominant player in the home video business.

0:01:27.400 --> 0:01:30.560
<v Speaker 3>In the early nineties, he was the president and CEO

0:01:30.680 --> 0:01:35.360
<v Speaker 3>of Crystal Dynamics, a super hot interactive entertainment software company startup,

0:01:35.640 --> 0:01:37.759
<v Speaker 3>and in the late nineties he was President and CEO

0:01:37.840 --> 0:01:40.800
<v Speaker 3>of BMG Entertainment, at that time one of the world's

0:01:40.920 --> 0:01:44.319
<v Speaker 3>largest music and entertainment companies with more than two hundred

0:01:44.400 --> 0:01:48.080
<v Speaker 3>record labels and operations in fifty four countries. He also

0:01:48.120 --> 0:01:51.120
<v Speaker 3>has an impressive academic resume. He has an MBA from

0:01:51.160 --> 0:01:53.360
<v Speaker 3>the Harvard Business School and a jd from the Harvard

0:01:53.400 --> 0:01:56.680
<v Speaker 3>Law School. He's known for his incredible commitment to physical

0:01:56.680 --> 0:02:00.000
<v Speaker 3>fitness and his commitment to the life he really wanted

0:02:00.200 --> 0:02:02.480
<v Speaker 3>to lead. I've been close to him for about forty

0:02:02.560 --> 0:02:05.640
<v Speaker 3>years and looking forward to digging in with him today. Strauss, welcome,

0:02:05.880 --> 0:02:06.880
<v Speaker 3>Thanks for having Dog.

0:02:06.960 --> 0:02:07.680
<v Speaker 2>Great to be here.

0:02:07.800 --> 0:02:09.560
<v Speaker 3>Before we jump in, I want to do you in

0:02:09.639 --> 0:02:13.640
<v Speaker 3>sixty seconds if you prefer cats or dogs, dogs early

0:02:13.720 --> 0:02:17.080
<v Speaker 3>riser or night out early Rassler West Coast or East Coast,

0:02:17.200 --> 0:02:22.440
<v Speaker 3>East Coast, New York or Boston, New York. Soccer or basketball, basketball,

0:02:22.720 --> 0:02:28.079
<v Speaker 3>sleep or workout, workout, coke or pepsi coke, beach or mountains, beach,

0:02:28.400 --> 0:02:32.880
<v Speaker 3>rock and roller, country country, coffee or tea coffee, walking

0:02:33.040 --> 0:02:38.040
<v Speaker 3>or running, walking, books or movies, books, cook or read out, cook,

0:02:38.240 --> 0:02:42.680
<v Speaker 3>Godfather or Star Wars, Star Wars, comedy or drama, comedy,

0:02:43.040 --> 0:02:48.679
<v Speaker 3>Hamburger or Tofu rap Hamburger caller text text about to

0:02:48.680 --> 0:02:51.000
<v Speaker 3>get harder. All time favorite music artist.

0:02:52.560 --> 0:02:57.040
<v Speaker 2>James Taylor, first job, Columbia Pictures, Television favorite TV show.

0:02:57.800 --> 0:03:02.720
<v Speaker 2>But that's really tough, friends, smartest person you know David Remnick,

0:03:03.000 --> 0:03:08.200
<v Speaker 2>childhood hero, John F. Kennedy, secret talent, personal trainer.

0:03:10.040 --> 0:03:11.639
<v Speaker 3>What did you want to be when you were growing up?

0:03:11.840 --> 0:03:13.000
<v Speaker 2>Head of the film studio?

0:03:14.120 --> 0:03:17.200
<v Speaker 3>Okay, let's jump in. One of your hallmarks is how

0:03:17.240 --> 0:03:21.320
<v Speaker 3>well you manage creative people and creative hits driven businesses

0:03:21.800 --> 0:03:25.240
<v Speaker 3>yet still make them successful businesses. How do you strike

0:03:25.280 --> 0:03:28.200
<v Speaker 3>that balance and how do you build and manage your teams?

0:03:28.680 --> 0:03:32.880
<v Speaker 2>You know, I try to build businesses that take enormous

0:03:32.919 --> 0:03:36.160
<v Speaker 2>creative risks and no financial risks. I try to be

0:03:36.240 --> 0:03:41.040
<v Speaker 2>creatively risk forward and financially risk averse. So my companies

0:03:41.080 --> 0:03:45.000
<v Speaker 2>are all underleveraged. If they're leveraged at all, and they

0:03:45.000 --> 0:03:49.960
<v Speaker 2>are I hope, rationally run and cash flow generating businesses.

0:03:50.560 --> 0:03:52.800
<v Speaker 2>And it's amazing how many people in the entertainment business

0:03:53.000 --> 0:03:56.600
<v Speaker 2>don't bother to think about that part. That's important because

0:03:56.640 --> 0:03:58.160
<v Speaker 2>if you have a strong P and L and a

0:03:58.160 --> 0:04:02.280
<v Speaker 2>strong balance sheet, creative teams understand that even if they

0:04:02.320 --> 0:04:05.400
<v Speaker 2>make a mistake, the company can live to play another day,

0:04:05.440 --> 0:04:07.920
<v Speaker 2>and the company can afford to make creative mistakes. And

0:04:08.520 --> 0:04:12.480
<v Speaker 2>if you're unable to take meaningful creative risk and therefore

0:04:12.720 --> 0:04:16.279
<v Speaker 2>run the risk of making horrible creative mistakes, then you

0:04:16.360 --> 0:04:21.480
<v Speaker 2>can't play in this business. I try really hard to recruit, retain,

0:04:21.600 --> 0:04:24.680
<v Speaker 2>and motivate the best talent in the business. I'm proud

0:04:24.720 --> 0:04:28.040
<v Speaker 2>of the fact that I've run every kind of entertainment

0:04:28.080 --> 0:04:32.440
<v Speaker 2>business there is, and my teams have had the highest

0:04:32.480 --> 0:04:36.120
<v Speaker 2>hit ratios of any teams operating the business at that time.

0:04:36.200 --> 0:04:40.320
<v Speaker 2>And that's without exception, and put that in context. I'm

0:04:40.320 --> 0:04:42.680
<v Speaker 2>not the one sitting in the corner office calling someone

0:04:42.760 --> 0:04:46.200
<v Speaker 2>up and giving them notes. I'm not reading scripts, I'm

0:04:46.200 --> 0:04:49.599
<v Speaker 2>not making video games, I'm not producing music, I'm not

0:04:50.000 --> 0:04:52.440
<v Speaker 2>directing TV shows, and I've never done any of that,

0:04:53.240 --> 0:04:56.320
<v Speaker 2>So what's the trick. The trick, in my opinion, is

0:04:56.520 --> 0:05:01.279
<v Speaker 2>truly being able to distinguish talent from almost talent, or

0:05:01.320 --> 0:05:05.480
<v Speaker 2>near talent or not talent, and then creating a structure

0:05:06.240 --> 0:05:10.160
<v Speaker 2>that not only allows talented people to pursue their passions,

0:05:10.800 --> 0:05:14.039
<v Speaker 2>but insists that they do so. I'm not sure this

0:05:14.120 --> 0:05:16.280
<v Speaker 2>is much of a skill, but the skill that I

0:05:16.320 --> 0:05:18.520
<v Speaker 2>have is that I seem to be able to identify

0:05:18.680 --> 0:05:21.200
<v Speaker 2>talent in others, and then I seem to be able

0:05:21.240 --> 0:05:25.240
<v Speaker 2>to encourage those talented people to work within the system

0:05:25.279 --> 0:05:27.960
<v Speaker 2>that I'm managing and to do their best work. And

0:05:28.000 --> 0:05:31.000
<v Speaker 2>I'm very proud of the fact that in my entire career,

0:05:31.080 --> 0:05:33.599
<v Speaker 2>I've never lost any talent that I didn't want to lose,

0:05:33.680 --> 0:05:38.359
<v Speaker 2>not once actually, and to this day, I think even

0:05:38.400 --> 0:05:41.400
<v Speaker 2>my competitors would have to acknowledge that Take two in

0:05:41.400 --> 0:05:44.800
<v Speaker 2>its affiliates have the best collection of creative talent in

0:05:44.839 --> 0:05:47.840
<v Speaker 2>the interactive entertainment business. I mean by a wide margin,

0:05:48.080 --> 0:05:50.680
<v Speaker 2>and our results reflect that our hit ratio reflects that.

0:05:51.160 --> 0:05:53.320
<v Speaker 3>So I'm going to dig into this little bit. I've

0:05:53.360 --> 0:05:57.159
<v Speaker 3>watched you do this for decades. You've taken an interest

0:05:57.200 --> 0:06:00.680
<v Speaker 3>in developing people, not people who already had skills, not

0:06:00.760 --> 0:06:04.000
<v Speaker 3>people that everybody's bidding on because they're the person, but

0:06:04.080 --> 0:06:06.760
<v Speaker 3>you really had an interest in developing the next generation

0:06:06.880 --> 0:06:10.440
<v Speaker 3>of leaders. How do you think about that and how

0:06:10.520 --> 0:06:12.839
<v Speaker 3>do you do it? And is it driven by just

0:06:12.920 --> 0:06:16.919
<v Speaker 3>good business giving back or something else.

0:06:17.960 --> 0:06:21.440
<v Speaker 2>There's an element of giving back because people bet on

0:06:21.520 --> 0:06:24.240
<v Speaker 2>me when I was young and inexperienced, and I like

0:06:24.279 --> 0:06:26.279
<v Speaker 2>to think that that paid off over and over again.

0:06:26.839 --> 0:06:29.440
<v Speaker 2>It's true that some of the very talented people who

0:06:29.520 --> 0:06:32.640
<v Speaker 2>run businesses for me today are people who I recruited

0:06:32.680 --> 0:06:38.040
<v Speaker 2>when they were unknown and inexperienced and in their twenties.

0:06:38.400 --> 0:06:41.960
<v Speaker 2>Carl Slatoff, was the president of Take two, has worked

0:06:42.000 --> 0:06:45.000
<v Speaker 2>with me in one enterprise or another since you graduated

0:06:45.000 --> 0:06:47.680
<v Speaker 2>from business school twenty seven or twenty eight years ago.

0:06:48.400 --> 0:06:51.880
<v Speaker 2>Andrew Vogel and Jordan Turkoitz were co CIOs of ZMC,

0:06:52.520 --> 0:06:56.159
<v Speaker 2>started with me when they were associates, very very early

0:06:56.200 --> 0:06:59.560
<v Speaker 2>in their careers, and now they're very senior at ZMC.

0:07:00.040 --> 0:07:02.800
<v Speaker 2>And it's a very long list actually across all of

0:07:02.839 --> 0:07:06.000
<v Speaker 2>my enterprises, and I have a whole alumni base as well.

0:07:07.000 --> 0:07:09.080
<v Speaker 2>I like to think, of course, there's an element of

0:07:09.120 --> 0:07:11.559
<v Speaker 2>being of service to others. I spend twenty to twenty

0:07:11.560 --> 0:07:14.800
<v Speaker 2>five percent of my time coaching and mentoring people, try

0:07:14.800 --> 0:07:17.160
<v Speaker 2>to help people, and most of those people are not

0:07:17.280 --> 0:07:21.960
<v Speaker 2>in any economic system of mind now and then they

0:07:22.000 --> 0:07:25.200
<v Speaker 2>are though, So it seems to me that the hardest

0:07:25.200 --> 0:07:29.480
<v Speaker 2>thing to do is convince established talent to leave where

0:07:29.480 --> 0:07:32.920
<v Speaker 2>they're happily employed and come to your system. And it's

0:07:32.960 --> 0:07:35.880
<v Speaker 2>a lot easier to develop your own if you have

0:07:35.960 --> 0:07:39.800
<v Speaker 2>a facility for identifying and developing talent to people, whether

0:07:39.800 --> 0:07:42.320
<v Speaker 2>they're on the creative or executive side. And as I said,

0:07:42.600 --> 0:07:45.320
<v Speaker 2>I think it's probably my only true skill in business.

0:07:45.400 --> 0:07:49.240
<v Speaker 2>Well maybe I'm a reasonably good capital alligator, but yes

0:07:49.320 --> 0:07:52.560
<v Speaker 2>you are. But really, I mean, because I work in

0:07:52.600 --> 0:07:56.720
<v Speaker 2>creative businesses, knowing the difference between good and great, that's

0:07:56.760 --> 0:08:00.400
<v Speaker 2>the whole shooting match, and then being willing to you know,

0:08:00.480 --> 0:08:03.080
<v Speaker 2>to work with them. So I don't think this is

0:08:03.120 --> 0:08:06.160
<v Speaker 2>talking out of school. When I got to Fox, Jim

0:08:06.200 --> 0:08:09.120
<v Speaker 2>Cameron was finishing up the ABYSS and he had a

0:08:09.160 --> 0:08:13.080
<v Speaker 2>reputation for being a challenging person to work with. And

0:08:13.480 --> 0:08:16.200
<v Speaker 2>I worked closely with Jim Cameron, which is to say,

0:08:16.920 --> 0:08:19.440
<v Speaker 2>whatever he wanted to do, I basically said yes to

0:08:19.600 --> 0:08:21.280
<v Speaker 2>because it was obvious to me that he was a

0:08:21.320 --> 0:08:23.720
<v Speaker 2>creative genius. It was, by the way, equally obvious that

0:08:24.200 --> 0:08:25.960
<v Speaker 2>I could say no or yes and he was still

0:08:25.960 --> 0:08:27.600
<v Speaker 2>going to do what he wanted. We could do this

0:08:27.720 --> 0:08:29.440
<v Speaker 2>easy way of the hard way, like why not do

0:08:29.480 --> 0:08:32.120
<v Speaker 2>it the easy way? So what I basically did was

0:08:32.280 --> 0:08:34.480
<v Speaker 2>to the extent he ever was interested in it, I

0:08:34.520 --> 0:08:38.480
<v Speaker 2>tried to hold his hand and support him, very very

0:08:38.600 --> 0:08:41.520
<v Speaker 2>very Occasionally he would be interested in my opinion or

0:08:41.559 --> 0:08:45.040
<v Speaker 2>ask for advice and I would offer it, and you know,

0:08:45.120 --> 0:08:48.400
<v Speaker 2>I was there to support and encourage him. And as

0:08:48.440 --> 0:08:52.480
<v Speaker 2>a result, he made more pictures for Fox, including after

0:08:52.520 --> 0:08:55.920
<v Speaker 2>I left. He had great success because I was right,

0:08:56.000 --> 0:08:59.400
<v Speaker 2>he was immensely talented, and I wasn't going to add

0:08:59.520 --> 0:09:02.559
<v Speaker 2>anything all to the creative quality of what he was doing.

0:09:03.200 --> 0:09:06.199
<v Speaker 2>So my choice was to say, let's make this experience

0:09:06.240 --> 0:09:09.079
<v Speaker 2>great for all involved, and like, let's get that hit

0:09:09.120 --> 0:09:09.679
<v Speaker 2>to market.

0:09:10.000 --> 0:09:13.079
<v Speaker 3>Let's talk about the people you help too. You've helped

0:09:13.120 --> 0:09:16.040
<v Speaker 3>people some on their way up, some already there. But

0:09:16.160 --> 0:09:17.720
<v Speaker 3>what do you learn from them?

0:09:18.200 --> 0:09:21.280
<v Speaker 2>I think you can learn from everyone, you know. I

0:09:21.280 --> 0:09:25.240
<v Speaker 2>have numerous friends who are decades younger, and by the way,

0:09:25.360 --> 0:09:28.880
<v Speaker 2>numerous fends who are decades older, and I can learn

0:09:28.920 --> 0:09:31.440
<v Speaker 2>and do learn from all of them. I find that today.

0:09:31.480 --> 0:09:33.320
<v Speaker 2>One of the reasons that I can continue to be

0:09:33.400 --> 0:09:35.679
<v Speaker 2>relevant and capable is that I spend a lot of

0:09:35.720 --> 0:09:38.280
<v Speaker 2>time with young people, so I don't have to play

0:09:38.320 --> 0:09:40.800
<v Speaker 2>catch up to figure out what TikTok is. I was

0:09:40.840 --> 0:09:43.959
<v Speaker 2>involved with Discord like days after it launched because I

0:09:44.320 --> 0:09:46.959
<v Speaker 2>have my ear of the ground with people who are

0:09:47.000 --> 0:09:51.360
<v Speaker 2>decades younger. That's very much informed what I do, particularly

0:09:51.440 --> 0:09:54.720
<v Speaker 2>in businesses like interactive entertainment, a big segment of which

0:09:54.760 --> 0:09:55.920
<v Speaker 2>is youth oriented.

0:09:56.280 --> 0:09:58.480
<v Speaker 3>We're talking about people here. Let's take a one more

0:09:58.520 --> 0:10:02.040
<v Speaker 3>step talk a little about the power of teams and collaboration.

0:10:02.520 --> 0:10:04.280
<v Speaker 2>I have mixed feelings about that. You know, it's funny.

0:10:04.320 --> 0:10:06.959
<v Speaker 2>I worked for Joe Roth at Fox, who was chairman

0:10:07.160 --> 0:10:09.720
<v Speaker 2>of the studio when I was president, and he said,

0:10:09.760 --> 0:10:14.120
<v Speaker 2>you know, creativity is ultimately a singular exercise. I agree

0:10:14.120 --> 0:10:16.040
<v Speaker 2>with that. I defy you to show me a big

0:10:16.120 --> 0:10:20.200
<v Speaker 2>hit that truly was created by a massive team. Generally

0:10:20.240 --> 0:10:24.199
<v Speaker 2>there was one powerful creative voice driving that. On the

0:10:24.240 --> 0:10:27.360
<v Speaker 2>other hand, particularly in businesses like interactive entertainment, you can't

0:10:27.400 --> 0:10:29.920
<v Speaker 2>execute anything without a big team, at least not currently.

0:10:30.320 --> 0:10:33.160
<v Speaker 2>So the true creative genius is in our business as

0:10:33.200 --> 0:10:37.199
<v Speaker 2>someone who can add value as an individual contributor creatively

0:10:37.400 --> 0:10:40.959
<v Speaker 2>and motivate a massive team to create value and then

0:10:41.160 --> 0:10:46.160
<v Speaker 2>ultimately pull the property together with some element of singular

0:10:46.240 --> 0:10:49.240
<v Speaker 2>focus to deliver a hit. I mean, I think that's

0:10:49.240 --> 0:10:52.280
<v Speaker 2>what a great director does. I think the showrunners play

0:10:52.320 --> 0:10:56.040
<v Speaker 2>that role in television, and producers play that role and

0:10:56.080 --> 0:11:00.280
<v Speaker 2>record of music and that's why you can listen into

0:11:00.360 --> 0:11:06.560
<v Speaker 2>music and certain producers had very specific sounds associated with

0:11:06.600 --> 0:11:09.679
<v Speaker 2>their approach. So I think it's both. To answer your question,

0:11:10.200 --> 0:11:13.760
<v Speaker 2>there's an element of singular creative leadership and engagement, and

0:11:13.840 --> 0:11:18.520
<v Speaker 2>then there is an element of encouraging and leading and

0:11:18.600 --> 0:11:23.439
<v Speaker 2>managing and motivating a big team to usher that vision

0:11:23.480 --> 0:11:24.200
<v Speaker 2>into reality.

0:11:24.800 --> 0:11:27.360
<v Speaker 3>You had a great career we touched on a little

0:11:27.360 --> 0:11:30.920
<v Speaker 3>bit at a very young age, huge jobs in your twenties.

0:11:31.840 --> 0:11:35.400
<v Speaker 3>Did that early head start shape you and make you

0:11:35.480 --> 0:11:37.960
<v Speaker 3>different from the leaders who are probably in their forties

0:11:37.960 --> 0:11:39.559
<v Speaker 3>before they reach those levels.

0:11:40.000 --> 0:11:42.520
<v Speaker 2>Well, I mean, there's nothing more pathetic than dining out

0:11:42.559 --> 0:11:45.599
<v Speaker 2>on your early success in life. I think maybe what

0:11:45.760 --> 0:11:49.120
<v Speaker 2>shape me is that I didn't get diverted later on

0:11:49.600 --> 0:11:52.680
<v Speaker 2>by stuff that maybe diverts people. So, you know, I

0:11:52.760 --> 0:11:55.040
<v Speaker 2>met all the stars, and I had a parking space

0:11:55.080 --> 0:11:59.000
<v Speaker 2>with my name on it very early in my career. Thankfully,

0:11:59.040 --> 0:12:01.760
<v Speaker 2>I'm not a person if it motivated by stuff like that,

0:12:02.360 --> 0:12:05.640
<v Speaker 2>So the thrill wore off really quickly, and I think

0:12:05.679 --> 0:12:08.720
<v Speaker 2>that allowed me to work and create a fields because

0:12:09.840 --> 0:12:12.480
<v Speaker 2>I'm not looking for an invitation to your cocktail party,

0:12:13.040 --> 0:12:17.840
<v Speaker 2>and I'm not starstruck, and ultimately, I don't confuse myself

0:12:17.920 --> 0:12:22.760
<v Speaker 2>with talent, and I'm not there for social purposes. I'm

0:12:22.760 --> 0:12:28.480
<v Speaker 2>there because I'm passionate about making extraordinary entertainment and because

0:12:28.520 --> 0:12:32.000
<v Speaker 2>I like running really good businesses. So I think maybe

0:12:32.280 --> 0:12:36.559
<v Speaker 2>doing well early allowed me to not get diverted by

0:12:36.640 --> 0:12:41.400
<v Speaker 2>stuff that does. Sometimes people who have access to these

0:12:41.440 --> 0:12:45.160
<v Speaker 2>fields later on where they're like, wow, this is amazing,

0:12:45.280 --> 0:12:47.319
<v Speaker 2>Like I can meet so and so and they can

0:12:47.360 --> 0:12:49.640
<v Speaker 2>come to my house and like next thing, you know,

0:12:49.679 --> 0:12:52.760
<v Speaker 2>they're making horrible business decisions as a result.

0:12:53.320 --> 0:12:54.680
<v Speaker 3>Yes, we've seen a lot of those.

0:12:55.160 --> 0:12:56.800
<v Speaker 2>Well I'll give you an example actually, because it's a

0:12:56.800 --> 0:12:59.480
<v Speaker 2>fun one, go for it. So as a twentieth century Fox,

0:12:59.600 --> 0:13:03.200
<v Speaker 2>and we were signing a deal to make a movie

0:13:03.480 --> 0:13:06.440
<v Speaker 2>with Warren Batty. So we're signing up this deal and

0:13:06.440 --> 0:13:09.640
<v Speaker 2>it had been long negotiated, was very tough. His order

0:13:09.720 --> 0:13:11.720
<v Speaker 2>was bird Fields. He didn't have an agent, and he

0:13:11.800 --> 0:13:14.800
<v Speaker 2>was intimately engaged with his own business affairs, and there

0:13:14.800 --> 0:13:17.560
<v Speaker 2>were some contentious elements of the deal. But finally had

0:13:17.600 --> 0:13:20.360
<v Speaker 2>gotten done and it was ready to be signed, and

0:13:20.440 --> 0:13:23.680
<v Speaker 2>I get a call from someone on his team saying

0:13:24.120 --> 0:13:26.680
<v Speaker 2>we're going to have a closing and we want you

0:13:26.720 --> 0:13:30.440
<v Speaker 2>to be there to sign the documents. And I was like,

0:13:31.200 --> 0:13:34.240
<v Speaker 2>I don't really do that, like like you just signed

0:13:34.240 --> 0:13:36.200
<v Speaker 2>the document, like you know, we're closing. So it wasn't

0:13:36.200 --> 0:13:39.880
<v Speaker 2>like we're buying a house. But okay, so there he said, Nope, nope,

0:13:39.920 --> 0:13:42.040
<v Speaker 2>mister Baty wants to have a closing and it's very

0:13:42.040 --> 0:13:43.800
<v Speaker 2>important that you'd be there to sign the documents. He

0:13:43.840 --> 0:13:46.280
<v Speaker 2>will be there to sign the documents. So I'm like

0:13:46.320 --> 0:13:49.599
<v Speaker 2>picking up the pen, ready to sign, like completely not

0:13:49.800 --> 0:13:52.240
<v Speaker 2>understanding why we're there. Very happy to meet him. By

0:13:52.240 --> 0:13:54.559
<v Speaker 2>the way, and he says, wait, wait, you know before

0:13:54.600 --> 0:13:58.160
<v Speaker 2>we sign, there are a couple things in the contract

0:13:58.200 --> 0:14:00.720
<v Speaker 2>that really, like, you know, just like mean a lot

0:14:00.760 --> 0:14:04.320
<v Speaker 2>to me if we could change. And he had fully

0:14:04.559 --> 0:14:08.080
<v Speaker 2>contemplated that the three or four sticking points it ultimately

0:14:08.120 --> 0:14:11.000
<v Speaker 2>had been resolved that he really wanted in a different direction.

0:14:11.600 --> 0:14:14.319
<v Speaker 2>He figured if he could get into a room with anyone,

0:14:14.360 --> 0:14:18.120
<v Speaker 2>they'd be so starstruck that they would just sign the documents.

0:14:18.559 --> 0:14:21.120
<v Speaker 2>And I said to him, Oh, sorry, I thought we're

0:14:21.160 --> 0:14:24.600
<v Speaker 2>here to have like a ceremonial closing, like I'm not

0:14:24.640 --> 0:14:27.000
<v Speaker 2>here to renegotiate the deal with you, mister Batty, And

0:14:27.080 --> 0:14:28.560
<v Speaker 2>I left the room. That was the end of it.

0:14:28.880 --> 0:14:30.120
<v Speaker 3>Did you ever change the points?

0:14:30.560 --> 0:14:33.160
<v Speaker 2>No? Then when you realized the gamp it didn't work,

0:14:33.560 --> 0:14:35.160
<v Speaker 2>they sent over the signed documents.

0:14:35.200 --> 0:14:39.720
<v Speaker 3>We did not have a certain very funny so New York.

0:14:40.240 --> 0:14:42.640
<v Speaker 3>Do you think you would have had the same level

0:14:42.640 --> 0:14:45.520
<v Speaker 3>of success if you had not been in and around

0:14:45.520 --> 0:14:47.920
<v Speaker 3>New York? Just New York give you an edge in

0:14:47.960 --> 0:14:48.400
<v Speaker 3>any way?

0:14:49.760 --> 0:14:51.880
<v Speaker 2>You know. I did work in California for five years

0:14:51.880 --> 0:14:55.920
<v Speaker 2>so and they were the right locations for those jobs.

0:14:56.000 --> 0:14:58.440
<v Speaker 2>But when I had the opportionity to turn around and

0:14:58.440 --> 0:15:01.040
<v Speaker 2>build up a record company I was located in New York.

0:15:01.080 --> 0:15:03.560
<v Speaker 2>I was actually happy to come back, because the truth is,

0:15:03.600 --> 0:15:05.720
<v Speaker 2>I was always more of a New York type person,

0:15:05.960 --> 0:15:09.280
<v Speaker 2>East Coast person in California when I was in the

0:15:09.320 --> 0:15:12.920
<v Speaker 2>movie business in the eighties and nineties and the Tellivision business,

0:15:12.960 --> 0:15:17.560
<v Speaker 2>the home entertainment business. Speaking grammatically wasn't necessarily like a benefit.

0:15:17.720 --> 0:15:22.520
<v Speaker 2>You may recall, and my multiple degrees from elite Eastern schools,

0:15:22.680 --> 0:15:25.520
<v Speaker 2>that was not a benefit that was detriment. There was

0:15:25.760 --> 0:15:27.760
<v Speaker 2>there no doubt that New York was maybe a little

0:15:27.760 --> 0:15:30.920
<v Speaker 2>more congenial. But it's a great question because as you know,

0:15:31.160 --> 0:15:34.840
<v Speaker 2>I started ZMC and that led to Take two. And

0:15:35.200 --> 0:15:37.520
<v Speaker 2>I do think that only could have worked in New

0:15:37.640 --> 0:15:42.360
<v Speaker 2>York because we had access to capital and access to

0:15:42.400 --> 0:15:46.360
<v Speaker 2>counterparties and access to deals that I don't think would

0:15:46.400 --> 0:15:48.840
<v Speaker 2>have come our way outside of New York.

0:15:49.880 --> 0:15:53.440
<v Speaker 3>Your book, Becoming Ageless The Four Secrets to Looking and

0:15:53.440 --> 0:15:56.880
<v Speaker 3>Feeling Younger than Ever, was put out in twenty eighteen.

0:15:57.120 --> 0:16:01.160
<v Speaker 3>Your four secrets are forever fuel eating for you, unlocking

0:16:01.160 --> 0:16:04.800
<v Speaker 3>inner strength, fitness three, bulletproofing the body, health and prevention,

0:16:05.240 --> 0:16:09.240
<v Speaker 3>and finding your soul connection. Community purpose? What motivated you

0:16:09.440 --> 0:16:12.160
<v Speaker 3>to write the book and seven years later, would you

0:16:12.200 --> 0:16:13.760
<v Speaker 3>amend any of the secrets?

0:16:14.040 --> 0:16:17.400
<v Speaker 2>What motivated me was people ask me all the time

0:16:18.480 --> 0:16:23.320
<v Speaker 2>how I managed to stay in reasonably good shape while

0:16:23.360 --> 0:16:27.680
<v Speaker 2>having an active professional life and an active personal life.

0:16:28.200 --> 0:16:31.920
<v Speaker 2>David Dizenko, who was at the time the editor in

0:16:32.040 --> 0:16:35.440
<v Speaker 2>chief of Men's Health, encouraged me to write the book

0:16:35.720 --> 0:16:39.080
<v Speaker 2>and published it through his label through Simon and Schuster. Ultimately,

0:16:39.600 --> 0:16:41.080
<v Speaker 2>I actually did it from a point of view being

0:16:41.120 --> 0:16:43.200
<v Speaker 2>of service to others. There are a number of things

0:16:43.240 --> 0:16:46.160
<v Speaker 2>I would amend. Probably the area that has evolved most

0:16:46.200 --> 0:16:49.480
<v Speaker 2>would be diet. So there's a whole bunch of diet

0:16:49.480 --> 0:16:52.160
<v Speaker 2>recommendations in the book, and they sort of err on

0:16:52.200 --> 0:16:56.120
<v Speaker 2>the side of ultra low carb and I'm no longer

0:16:56.160 --> 0:16:57.920
<v Speaker 2>of the view that that's a really good idea.

0:16:58.000 --> 0:17:00.280
<v Speaker 3>I like this. You're saying we can eat a lot

0:17:00.280 --> 0:17:02.640
<v Speaker 3>of carbs. Now this is the best news I have heard.

0:17:03.280 --> 0:17:05.919
<v Speaker 3>I'm saying you can eat a balanced diet that includes carbs,

0:17:06.200 --> 0:17:08.399
<v Speaker 3>and that I was low CARBD for a while. I

0:17:08.440 --> 0:17:12.119
<v Speaker 3>wouldn't publish something that wasn't accurate, and what I found

0:17:12.480 --> 0:17:14.600
<v Speaker 3>was that it really didn't allow me to be my

0:17:14.680 --> 0:17:17.760
<v Speaker 3>best self in any way, but certainly not physically. Actually

0:17:17.760 --> 0:17:20.360
<v Speaker 3>went on a cycling trip when I was in sort

0:17:20.400 --> 0:17:23.680
<v Speaker 3>of really low carb diet. I kept cramping up because

0:17:23.680 --> 0:17:27.359
<v Speaker 3>you can't really retain enough water to avoid cramping if

0:17:27.359 --> 0:17:30.040
<v Speaker 3>you're ultra low carb. I defy you to find a

0:17:30.119 --> 0:17:33.719
<v Speaker 3>runner a marathon or who's truly low carb, it's virtually

0:17:33.720 --> 0:17:36.879
<v Speaker 3>impossible to do. In the late nineteen nineties, we were

0:17:36.880 --> 0:17:40.879
<v Speaker 3>in Jamaica together and we worked out, and I remember

0:17:40.960 --> 0:17:43.040
<v Speaker 3>at that workout saying, oh, this guy's pretty serious about

0:17:43.040 --> 0:17:46.280
<v Speaker 3>his workout, but you looked nothing like you do today

0:17:46.680 --> 0:17:49.720
<v Speaker 3>in terms of what you've done. So what was it

0:17:49.840 --> 0:17:53.000
<v Speaker 3>that sort of brought this about? What sort of coalesced

0:17:53.000 --> 0:17:54.840
<v Speaker 3>around the idea of I'm going to be in shape

0:17:55.040 --> 0:17:57.320
<v Speaker 3>and I'm going to wake This very important in my life.

0:17:57.760 --> 0:18:00.879
<v Speaker 2>If someone's avidly going to the gym and I acknowledge

0:18:00.920 --> 0:18:03.960
<v Speaker 2>some element of vanity, then they're just not being candid.

0:18:04.400 --> 0:18:07.080
<v Speaker 2>So there is an element of wanting to look my best.

0:18:07.600 --> 0:18:10.600
<v Speaker 2>My view actually is it looking your best is a

0:18:10.600 --> 0:18:13.840
<v Speaker 2>sign of respect for yourself, and part of that is

0:18:14.119 --> 0:18:17.480
<v Speaker 2>being in reasonably good shape. In my case, working out

0:18:17.600 --> 0:18:20.359
<v Speaker 2>speaks to me in so many ways. First, because I

0:18:20.359 --> 0:18:24.199
<v Speaker 2>actually enjoy the process itself, and secondly because I like

0:18:24.240 --> 0:18:27.159
<v Speaker 2>the result, and then third and now these days, probably

0:18:27.200 --> 0:18:29.840
<v Speaker 2>most importantly, I work out with a huge fitness community

0:18:30.560 --> 0:18:33.080
<v Speaker 2>and these people who become my tribe.

0:18:33.440 --> 0:18:35.840
<v Speaker 3>And so do you work out every day or do

0:18:35.920 --> 0:18:36.960
<v Speaker 3>you take some days off?

0:18:37.480 --> 0:18:40.240
<v Speaker 2>Well, here's what one should do. If you work out avidly,

0:18:40.440 --> 0:18:42.320
<v Speaker 2>you probably ought to take one or two rest days

0:18:42.320 --> 0:18:45.040
<v Speaker 2>a week. And rest day does not mean like workout,

0:18:45.160 --> 0:18:49.040
<v Speaker 2>just less. Seriously, rest day means actually rest. In my case,

0:18:49.040 --> 0:18:51.560
<v Speaker 2>I take a rest day somewhere between you know, zero

0:18:51.720 --> 0:18:54.239
<v Speaker 2>and one day a week, but certainly within a two

0:18:54.280 --> 0:18:56.280
<v Speaker 2>week span, I will take at least one rest day.

0:18:56.320 --> 0:18:58.840
<v Speaker 2>And I do have days where the workouts are pretty light,

0:18:59.600 --> 0:19:01.840
<v Speaker 2>but I sometimes work out twice a day, So in

0:19:01.880 --> 0:19:05.399
<v Speaker 2>any given week, I typically work out between eight and

0:19:05.480 --> 0:19:06.280
<v Speaker 2>ten times.

0:19:06.600 --> 0:19:10.000
<v Speaker 3>What kind of parallel do you see between your success

0:19:10.040 --> 0:19:13.199
<v Speaker 3>and business and exercise? How are the two related?

0:19:13.960 --> 0:19:17.080
<v Speaker 2>I think they're related in that I'm willing to defer

0:19:17.280 --> 0:19:21.600
<v Speaker 2>gratification and I can find pleasure in doing hard things.

0:19:22.119 --> 0:19:24.240
<v Speaker 3>Tell us one more piece. Tell us about your daily

0:19:24.280 --> 0:19:27.600
<v Speaker 3>practice of silent prayer and what that does for you

0:19:27.680 --> 0:19:29.000
<v Speaker 3>and those around you.

0:19:29.000 --> 0:19:31.680
<v Speaker 2>You know, I've engaged in a prayer practice for fourteen years,

0:19:31.720 --> 0:19:34.199
<v Speaker 2>and to be clear, it's not a particularly religious practice.

0:19:34.240 --> 0:19:37.680
<v Speaker 2>Although it is prayer, it's non denominational, and my prayer

0:19:37.720 --> 0:19:41.600
<v Speaker 2>practice takes three or four minutes. It doesn't depend on

0:19:41.600 --> 0:19:43.720
<v Speaker 2>a belief that there's anyone on the other end listening

0:19:43.720 --> 0:19:45.560
<v Speaker 2>to it, although there are days when I feel that

0:19:45.560 --> 0:19:47.360
<v Speaker 2>that might be the case, or also plenty of days

0:19:47.359 --> 0:19:52.160
<v Speaker 2>when I don't. The first part is to express gratitude

0:19:52.200 --> 0:19:56.280
<v Speaker 2>for all of the blessings of my life, both people

0:19:56.400 --> 0:20:02.119
<v Speaker 2>and things. The second is to ask for blessings for

0:20:02.200 --> 0:20:05.359
<v Speaker 2>people I care about and, with a little more difficulty,

0:20:05.520 --> 0:20:08.680
<v Speaker 2>people I resent. Luckily, that's a very short list. Usually

0:20:08.760 --> 0:20:10.359
<v Speaker 2>there's no one on that list, but if there is

0:20:10.359 --> 0:20:12.439
<v Speaker 2>someone on the list, I do pray for that person

0:20:13.080 --> 0:20:15.760
<v Speaker 2>for good things to happen in that person. And then, finally,

0:20:15.880 --> 0:20:18.160
<v Speaker 2>the third part is to set an intention for the day,

0:20:18.600 --> 0:20:22.360
<v Speaker 2>which involves not trying to barrel through life, but rather

0:20:22.640 --> 0:20:25.040
<v Speaker 2>trying to go through life with a bit of grace

0:20:25.080 --> 0:20:28.920
<v Speaker 2>and trying to listen and find beauty in the day.

0:20:29.280 --> 0:20:31.960
<v Speaker 2>That's where my practice looks like many people. I think

0:20:32.119 --> 0:20:34.159
<v Speaker 2>they'll relate to the notion that when I wake up

0:20:34.160 --> 0:20:36.000
<v Speaker 2>first thing in the morning, my head can be full

0:20:36.040 --> 0:20:41.359
<v Speaker 2>of random thoughts or anxiety provoking thoughts, and I find

0:20:41.359 --> 0:20:44.600
<v Speaker 2>that the prayer practice will come and center me and

0:20:44.640 --> 0:20:46.480
<v Speaker 2>set me up for a better day.

0:20:47.280 --> 0:20:49.880
<v Speaker 3>So you talked about your community when you work out,

0:20:50.880 --> 0:20:54.000
<v Speaker 3>Let's talk about friends. How many do you need and

0:20:54.119 --> 0:20:57.119
<v Speaker 3>how important is that to life? This is such a

0:20:57.160 --> 0:21:01.400
<v Speaker 3>personal decision. In my case, it all depends on how

0:21:01.400 --> 0:21:05.040
<v Speaker 3>you define a friend. In terms of truly intimate friends,

0:21:05.720 --> 0:21:08.240
<v Speaker 3>I actually have a lot, but that numbers I don't

0:21:08.280 --> 0:21:11.960
<v Speaker 3>know ten people, twenty people. In terms of people that

0:21:12.000 --> 0:21:16.400
<v Speaker 3>I would say I really care about and know about.

0:21:16.160 --> 0:21:19.359
<v Speaker 2>And connect with. In my case, that's a couple hundred people.

0:21:19.920 --> 0:21:22.520
<v Speaker 2>Bob as examples our friendship, like, we don't see each

0:21:22.520 --> 0:21:25.040
<v Speaker 2>other all that often. We probably get together a few

0:21:25.080 --> 0:21:27.879
<v Speaker 2>times a year, But every time we get together we

0:21:27.920 --> 0:21:32.119
<v Speaker 2>talk about real stuff, not superficial stuff. We actually know

0:21:32.160 --> 0:21:36.560
<v Speaker 2>one another's story, we have a long history. We connect,

0:21:36.960 --> 0:21:41.119
<v Speaker 2>and we leave one another's presence feeling energized and happy

0:21:41.160 --> 0:21:44.200
<v Speaker 2>that we saw one another. We just to say, even

0:21:44.240 --> 0:21:47.000
<v Speaker 2>though we don't see each other all that frequently, I

0:21:47.240 --> 0:21:50.439
<v Speaker 2>consider it a relatively intimate friendship, and I'm blessed that

0:21:50.480 --> 0:21:52.800
<v Speaker 2>I have a relationship like that with many people.

0:21:53.040 --> 0:21:55.439
<v Speaker 3>Yes, I just saw I was scrolling on Instagram and

0:21:55.480 --> 0:21:58.240
<v Speaker 3>saw somebody say, why is it that the people we

0:21:58.320 --> 0:22:01.760
<v Speaker 3>are really intimate with really get us and we really

0:22:01.840 --> 0:22:05.080
<v Speaker 3>care about live a bazillion miles away. You said, we

0:22:05.119 --> 0:22:06.639
<v Speaker 3>see each other a couple of times a year. But

0:22:06.920 --> 0:22:09.080
<v Speaker 3>to me, the mark of the friend is that when

0:22:09.119 --> 0:22:12.000
<v Speaker 3>I see you, it's like we just saw each other yesterday,

0:22:12.320 --> 0:22:14.320
<v Speaker 3>that we just pack up and keep going.

0:22:14.080 --> 0:22:16.760
<v Speaker 2>And then we talk about actually real stuff. I have

0:22:16.800 --> 0:22:19.320
<v Speaker 2>a friend I don't see that often, and when we

0:22:19.359 --> 0:22:22.080
<v Speaker 2>sit down, he'll say, Okay, tell me the bad stuff.

0:22:22.600 --> 0:22:24.040
<v Speaker 2>I know there's a bunch of good stuff, tell me

0:22:24.080 --> 0:22:26.040
<v Speaker 2>the bad stuff, or which is his way of saying,

0:22:26.480 --> 0:22:28.400
<v Speaker 2>I want to connect with you on what really matters.

0:22:28.960 --> 0:22:32.800
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, that's great. So you've talked about waking up in

0:22:32.840 --> 0:22:36.360
<v Speaker 3>the morning, all those ideas anxiety in your head. Tell

0:22:36.359 --> 0:22:38.960
<v Speaker 3>me about sleep? Is it important? How much do we need?

0:22:39.160 --> 0:22:43.200
<v Speaker 2>Sleep is really important? And unless you're an actual short sleeper,

0:22:43.359 --> 0:22:47.600
<v Speaker 2>and those people do exist, you probably need seven plus

0:22:47.640 --> 0:22:50.440
<v Speaker 2>hours a night to be refreshed and to be at

0:22:50.440 --> 0:22:55.040
<v Speaker 2>your best. Candidly, I probably get somewhere between six and

0:22:55.240 --> 0:22:59.000
<v Speaker 2>seven and a half hours. No matter how much I try,

0:22:59.080 --> 0:23:01.399
<v Speaker 2>I can't generally fine time for more and still do

0:23:01.480 --> 0:23:04.280
<v Speaker 2>everything else I care about. But if I get much less,

0:23:04.320 --> 0:23:07.440
<v Speaker 2>I really have a rotten day. Short sleepers are people

0:23:07.440 --> 0:23:12.520
<v Speaker 2>who really can be active and refreshed and healthy on

0:23:12.600 --> 0:23:15.440
<v Speaker 2>three and a half four hours of sleep. I'm pretty

0:23:15.480 --> 0:23:18.760
<v Speaker 2>sure carl Icon is a short sleeper. For example. Being

0:23:18.840 --> 0:23:21.040
<v Speaker 2>a short sleeper is very different than someone who just

0:23:21.200 --> 0:23:23.680
<v Speaker 2>is sleep deprived all the time. And that's not a

0:23:23.720 --> 0:23:25.600
<v Speaker 2>good thing, and it takes a terrible toll on your

0:23:25.640 --> 0:23:26.920
<v Speaker 2>physical and mental health.

0:23:27.440 --> 0:23:29.120
<v Speaker 3>You said you get that much sleep. How much time

0:23:29.160 --> 0:23:31.399
<v Speaker 3>in bed are you to get that amount of sleep?

0:23:32.440 --> 0:23:35.200
<v Speaker 2>My wife can confirm my head hits the pillow and

0:23:35.240 --> 0:23:37.199
<v Speaker 2>about fifteen seconds later I'm asleep.

0:23:37.400 --> 0:23:39.960
<v Speaker 3>God, I'm jealous. I could just do a one hour

0:23:40.040 --> 0:23:41.800
<v Speaker 3>tossing and turning in the night. I consider that a

0:23:41.840 --> 0:23:46.280
<v Speaker 3>big win. Let's jump to philanthropy. You are very generous,

0:23:46.320 --> 0:23:49.800
<v Speaker 3>you and your wife. How do you think about philanthropy

0:23:49.920 --> 0:23:52.840
<v Speaker 3>in your life and business and personal and how do

0:23:52.880 --> 0:23:55.560
<v Speaker 3>you decide where are you're going with it? Who gets

0:23:55.560 --> 0:23:58.160
<v Speaker 3>to be the BENEFICIARYA what's kind of you to ask

0:23:58.400 --> 0:24:03.280
<v Speaker 3>very broadly I try and really emphasize try to be

0:24:03.320 --> 0:24:06.440
<v Speaker 3>of service in my life. We have a family foundation

0:24:06.760 --> 0:24:10.120
<v Speaker 3>and our sons are on the board, and we have

0:24:10.320 --> 0:24:12.800
<v Speaker 3>three or four areas of interest, and we try to

0:24:12.840 --> 0:24:16.159
<v Speaker 3>focus most of our giving on those areas of interest.

0:24:16.760 --> 0:24:19.600
<v Speaker 3>I have a friend who's very wealthy and a philanthropist,

0:24:19.680 --> 0:24:22.600
<v Speaker 3>and her view is, look, you know, I like to

0:24:22.640 --> 0:24:24.919
<v Speaker 3>be supportive of my friend's interests.

0:24:24.960 --> 0:24:27.480
<v Speaker 2>So we give about twenty five percent of money we

0:24:27.520 --> 0:24:30.600
<v Speaker 2>give away every year to our friend's interests, and we

0:24:30.840 --> 0:24:33.480
<v Speaker 2>kind of never say no. And seventy five percent, though,

0:24:33.480 --> 0:24:35.879
<v Speaker 2>we try to direct to the areas of interest of

0:24:35.920 --> 0:24:38.280
<v Speaker 2>our interests so that we can make a real impact.

0:24:38.640 --> 0:24:40.680
<v Speaker 2>But the bulk of what we give away we try

0:24:40.680 --> 0:24:43.399
<v Speaker 2>to focus on areas of interest, which is our local

0:24:43.440 --> 0:24:45.960
<v Speaker 2>community in Bedford, which is where we spend a lot

0:24:46.000 --> 0:24:50.479
<v Speaker 2>of time, and special needs education and support because our

0:24:50.560 --> 0:24:53.919
<v Speaker 2>daughter has special needs, and then a couple other areas

0:24:53.960 --> 0:24:54.440
<v Speaker 2>of interest.

0:24:57.000 --> 0:24:59.639
<v Speaker 3>More of math and magic right after this quick break,

0:25:06.480 --> 0:25:08.920
<v Speaker 3>Welcome back to math and magic. Let's hear more from

0:25:08.920 --> 0:25:14.119
<v Speaker 3>my conversation with Strausselnik. Well, let's go back in time

0:25:14.200 --> 0:25:17.960
<v Speaker 3>to put you in context. Tell us about where you

0:25:18.040 --> 0:25:21.560
<v Speaker 3>grew up and paint a picture of that time and

0:25:22.000 --> 0:25:25.200
<v Speaker 3>pick out those few childhood events that you think looking back,

0:25:25.320 --> 0:25:26.600
<v Speaker 3>shaped you the most.

0:25:26.920 --> 0:25:30.920
<v Speaker 2>So I grew up in a striving, middle class family

0:25:31.000 --> 0:25:34.960
<v Speaker 2>in Boston. My father was a lawyer, my mom worked

0:25:35.040 --> 0:25:39.399
<v Speaker 2>part time. They were both highly educated and very ambitious,

0:25:40.200 --> 0:25:44.159
<v Speaker 2>and three siblings. Tragedy struck first. My parents got divorced

0:25:44.160 --> 0:25:47.000
<v Speaker 2>when I was quite young, six, and then my mother

0:25:47.080 --> 0:25:50.320
<v Speaker 2>suddenly passed away when I was ten, and my father

0:25:50.680 --> 0:25:54.639
<v Speaker 2>basically abandoned the family at that point, despite being a

0:25:54.720 --> 0:25:58.920
<v Speaker 2>very fancy lawyer Locally. We went to live with my uncle,

0:25:58.920 --> 0:26:01.520
<v Speaker 2>who became my second set of parents in New Jersey

0:26:02.200 --> 0:26:05.920
<v Speaker 2>when I was ten. I had pretty tragic childhood. I mean,

0:26:06.119 --> 0:26:08.919
<v Speaker 2>there are plenty of other attributes of my childhood, but

0:26:09.200 --> 0:26:11.119
<v Speaker 2>those are the things that really stand out. And I

0:26:11.160 --> 0:26:16.240
<v Speaker 2>think that childhood tragedy can have one of two effects.

0:26:16.840 --> 0:26:18.880
<v Speaker 2>The first is it can make you feel like you're

0:26:19.800 --> 0:26:21.720
<v Speaker 2>a victim and that the world is out to get you,

0:26:21.760 --> 0:26:23.879
<v Speaker 2>and that does not lead to good things later in life.

0:26:24.400 --> 0:26:28.040
<v Speaker 2>The other effect is that it can light a fire

0:26:28.119 --> 0:26:30.240
<v Speaker 2>under you and motivate you. And I had the latter

0:26:31.200 --> 0:26:34.359
<v Speaker 2>happened to me. Not all my siblings did, but I did,

0:26:34.680 --> 0:26:36.919
<v Speaker 2>and I was just of the view that if I

0:26:37.000 --> 0:26:40.400
<v Speaker 2>work hard enough, then nothing bad will ever happen to me. Again,

0:26:40.520 --> 0:26:44.680
<v Speaker 2>of course, that's a fallacy, wasn't true. Plenty of challenging

0:26:44.760 --> 0:26:48.080
<v Speaker 2>things have come my way, but I think I'm more

0:26:48.119 --> 0:26:50.920
<v Speaker 2>than a bit of a perfectionist. I've managed to moderate

0:26:50.960 --> 0:26:53.600
<v Speaker 2>that over the years. And a lot of that came

0:26:53.640 --> 0:26:57.360
<v Speaker 2>from my tragic childhood. I wouldn't wish it on anyone,

0:26:57.520 --> 0:27:01.320
<v Speaker 2>but it was highly motivating. There were other elements too.

0:27:01.400 --> 0:27:04.199
<v Speaker 2>I mean, despite this, my family really believed in me

0:27:04.240 --> 0:27:08.159
<v Speaker 2>and encouraged me. I said I wanted to run a

0:27:08.200 --> 0:27:10.919
<v Speaker 2>movie studio, and no one laughed. And even though like

0:27:11.000 --> 0:27:14.720
<v Speaker 2>my family had no connection to the business whatsoever, but

0:27:14.760 --> 0:27:18.600
<v Speaker 2>my family's willing to support me and my ambitions.

0:27:19.080 --> 0:27:21.560
<v Speaker 3>You know, Strauss, I appreciate you sharing that. That is

0:27:21.680 --> 0:27:26.280
<v Speaker 3>very personal and it is a chilling trauma. That's exactly right,

0:27:26.320 --> 0:27:27.840
<v Speaker 3>and by the way, we see it in other people

0:27:28.240 --> 0:27:30.760
<v Speaker 3>as well, that you know, get two directions when you

0:27:30.800 --> 0:27:33.159
<v Speaker 3>get hit with that, something good came out of it.

0:27:33.720 --> 0:27:37.280
<v Speaker 3>But when did Strauss the entrepreneur emerge? Was that a

0:27:37.400 --> 0:27:41.080
<v Speaker 3>childhood thing or was that later in life? I don't

0:27:41.080 --> 0:27:43.199
<v Speaker 3>think I was a born entrepreneur. You know, I was

0:27:43.240 --> 0:27:47.119
<v Speaker 3>a good employee. I liked being a professional manager. I

0:27:47.160 --> 0:27:50.160
<v Speaker 3>think I was good at it. I understood like chain

0:27:50.240 --> 0:27:53.280
<v Speaker 3>of command. I had respect for my bosses. So I

0:27:53.359 --> 0:27:55.200
<v Speaker 3>was not someone who was like, oh, this is horrible,

0:27:55.240 --> 0:27:56.480
<v Speaker 3>I have to get out of here and do my

0:27:56.520 --> 0:27:58.480
<v Speaker 3>own thing. On the one hand, on the other hand,

0:27:59.400 --> 0:28:02.239
<v Speaker 3>I did want to build something. The truth is, you know,

0:28:02.359 --> 0:28:06.040
<v Speaker 3>by the time I started ZMC, I was not young.

0:28:06.240 --> 0:28:09.320
<v Speaker 3>I was forty three, and I had a really good career.

0:28:09.520 --> 0:28:12.120
<v Speaker 2>I was paid well running a big record business, and

0:28:12.280 --> 0:28:15.160
<v Speaker 2>you know, there were other jobs that would come my way,

0:28:16.160 --> 0:28:18.400
<v Speaker 2>and I decided to take you know, one hundred ccent

0:28:18.440 --> 0:28:21.480
<v Speaker 2>pay cut and start a business that was aiming to

0:28:21.520 --> 0:28:25.600
<v Speaker 2>build a multi billion dollar diversified technology driven media business

0:28:25.640 --> 0:28:29.120
<v Speaker 2>from scratch. But what drove me was not like, oh,

0:28:29.160 --> 0:28:30.520
<v Speaker 2>I need to make a whole lot of dop because

0:28:30.640 --> 0:28:32.800
<v Speaker 2>that was never motivating for me, and I did well

0:28:33.720 --> 0:28:36.439
<v Speaker 2>working for other people. But here's the truth. Like I

0:28:36.480 --> 0:28:38.040
<v Speaker 2>looked at my career and even though I'd done a

0:28:38.040 --> 0:28:40.800
<v Speaker 2>bunch of turnarounds, I thought to myself, listen, how hard

0:28:40.840 --> 0:28:43.000
<v Speaker 2>can it be when someone hands you a business card

0:28:43.000 --> 0:28:45.680
<v Speaker 2>that says president of twentieth century far it's like and

0:28:45.800 --> 0:28:48.360
<v Speaker 2>a balance sheet by the way, and like a safety net,

0:28:48.440 --> 0:28:50.240
<v Speaker 2>and you got Ruper Murdock sitting in the corner of

0:28:50.360 --> 0:28:52.120
<v Speaker 2>It's like, how hard can that be? If you can't

0:28:52.120 --> 0:28:55.040
<v Speaker 2>do well in that circumstance, you got to be pretty lame.

0:28:55.120 --> 0:28:59.320
<v Speaker 2>But I don't know doing something totally from scratch, Like

0:28:59.480 --> 0:29:03.720
<v Speaker 2>totally from scratch, that's challenging, and that'll be a real test.

0:29:04.520 --> 0:29:07.400
<v Speaker 2>And you know, I set out to build a twenty

0:29:07.400 --> 0:29:11.760
<v Speaker 2>billion dollar business from scratch that was, you know, a

0:29:11.840 --> 0:29:15.280
<v Speaker 2>leader in the intersection of technology and entertainment. And today

0:29:15.320 --> 0:29:18.120
<v Speaker 2>we have tweens emc Intake two and they, you know,

0:29:18.160 --> 0:29:20.680
<v Speaker 2>about a fifty five billion dollar enterprise that is a

0:29:20.760 --> 0:29:24.000
<v Speaker 2>leader in the intersection of technology and entertainment. This was

0:29:24.040 --> 0:29:26.200
<v Speaker 2>not a singular exercise, to say the least. It was

0:29:26.200 --> 0:29:29.560
<v Speaker 2>a team exercise. And I have something like twenty thousand

0:29:29.720 --> 0:29:32.160
<v Speaker 2>colleagues across the system who did all the hard work

0:29:32.160 --> 0:29:34.880
<v Speaker 2>and the heavy lifting. But it is also true that

0:29:34.920 --> 0:29:36.719
<v Speaker 2>it would not exist if I had not done it,

0:29:36.920 --> 0:29:40.000
<v Speaker 2>and that was important to me. And I remember having

0:29:40.000 --> 0:29:42.480
<v Speaker 2>the presence of mind because I've always been able to

0:29:42.480 --> 0:29:46.040
<v Speaker 2>think far into the future when I was forty, and

0:29:46.120 --> 0:29:48.880
<v Speaker 2>I thought to myself, I know, this is incredibly risky

0:29:48.920 --> 0:29:51.640
<v Speaker 2>and the odds of failure are incredibly high. But I

0:29:51.720 --> 0:29:53.920
<v Speaker 2>don't want to be at the end of my life

0:29:54.080 --> 0:29:56.080
<v Speaker 2>and look back and say could it, would have? Should have?

0:29:56.920 --> 0:29:59.040
<v Speaker 2>I got to give it a try. So maybe in

0:29:59.040 --> 0:30:04.040
<v Speaker 2>that way there was an element of, you know, entrepreneurial fire.

0:30:04.520 --> 0:30:07.360
<v Speaker 2>But I don't think it is typical entrepreneurial fire because

0:30:07.360 --> 0:30:09.440
<v Speaker 2>I didn't object to working for other people.

0:30:09.800 --> 0:30:12.000
<v Speaker 3>Even on those jobs. When you were working for others,

0:30:12.000 --> 0:30:16.040
<v Speaker 3>I think of you as an entrepreneurial personality that within

0:30:16.120 --> 0:30:19.479
<v Speaker 3>those companies you didn't think like the cog and the wheel,

0:30:19.760 --> 0:30:22.000
<v Speaker 3>that you really did see things differently. And I must

0:30:22.040 --> 0:30:23.520
<v Speaker 3>say I'm gonna tell one story on you. I hope

0:30:23.520 --> 0:30:25.880
<v Speaker 3>you don't mind. Is I was so impressed when you

0:30:25.920 --> 0:30:29.320
<v Speaker 3>were running BMG that you were learning German because it

0:30:29.360 --> 0:30:32.120
<v Speaker 3>was a German company, and I go, wow, that is

0:30:32.160 --> 0:30:34.680
<v Speaker 3>some commitment. And you actually got pretty good at it,

0:30:34.720 --> 0:30:35.040
<v Speaker 3>didn't you.

0:30:35.760 --> 0:30:38.520
<v Speaker 2>Yeah. I surprised people too, because I didn't tell anyone

0:30:39.520 --> 0:30:41.920
<v Speaker 2>because you tard language. No, I didn't tell anyone in

0:30:41.960 --> 0:30:44.440
<v Speaker 2>the company. I was there for about two years before

0:30:44.440 --> 0:30:45.960
<v Speaker 2>I could speak it. And then one day I had

0:30:46.280 --> 0:30:48.120
<v Speaker 2>had offices all over the world and I was going

0:30:48.160 --> 0:30:51.880
<v Speaker 2>to my office in Munich. The plane was late. I

0:30:51.920 --> 0:30:55.520
<v Speaker 2>was in baggage claim. I called my office in Munich

0:30:55.560 --> 0:30:58.680
<v Speaker 2>and in German, I said, this is Strauss and I'm

0:30:58.760 --> 0:31:01.120
<v Speaker 2>running late. I apologize if you don't mind, could you

0:31:01.160 --> 0:31:05.080
<v Speaker 2>move My first meeting, my assistant was like in German,

0:31:05.240 --> 0:31:08.520
<v Speaker 2>was like who is this. That was like, it's yess

0:31:08.600 --> 0:31:10.719
<v Speaker 2>and she was like, you don't speak German. I was like, well,

0:31:10.760 --> 0:31:14.440
<v Speaker 2>actually I do speak German. I spoke proficiently, not fluently.

0:31:14.440 --> 0:31:16.400
<v Speaker 2>There is a difference, but I did speak well enough

0:31:16.440 --> 0:31:19.240
<v Speaker 2>to attend board meetings and actually conduct business in German.

0:31:19.760 --> 0:31:21.200
<v Speaker 2>And I thought it was a sign of respect to

0:31:21.240 --> 0:31:23.479
<v Speaker 2>the organization. But more to the point, you know, I'm

0:31:23.480 --> 0:31:25.400
<v Speaker 2>a good student. I like studying things, and I thought,

0:31:25.440 --> 0:31:28.360
<v Speaker 2>what a great opportunity I'll learn to speak German. Wall

0:31:28.400 --> 0:31:28.680
<v Speaker 2>in here.

0:31:29.080 --> 0:31:31.280
<v Speaker 3>That was one more impressive things you've done in my mind.

0:31:31.320 --> 0:31:32.960
<v Speaker 3>I know you've done a lot of great business things,

0:31:33.000 --> 0:31:35.080
<v Speaker 3>but I was really impressed with that. Let's get out

0:31:35.080 --> 0:31:38.560
<v Speaker 3>the crystal ball for a minute, Ai, I know you

0:31:38.640 --> 0:31:42.000
<v Speaker 3>have some interesting views. How should we think about it

0:31:42.080 --> 0:31:43.400
<v Speaker 3>and its impact.

0:31:43.640 --> 0:31:48.160
<v Speaker 2>The technology that people are calling AI is it is

0:31:48.280 --> 0:31:51.560
<v Speaker 2>a massive step forward in digital technology, but at the

0:31:51.640 --> 0:31:53.760
<v Speaker 2>end of the day, it's still an array of digital

0:31:53.800 --> 0:31:58.400
<v Speaker 2>tools that minimally create productivity, which is what digital tools

0:31:58.400 --> 0:32:02.480
<v Speaker 2>have always done. And I think the productivity opportunities are

0:32:02.520 --> 0:32:07.440
<v Speaker 2>really quite significant. But let's not confuse digital tools with

0:32:08.440 --> 0:32:13.000
<v Speaker 2>the singularity, which in my opinion is utter nonsense. That's

0:32:13.040 --> 0:32:17.600
<v Speaker 2>the merging of human brain power with digital brain power.

0:32:18.200 --> 0:32:20.400
<v Speaker 2>To the extent you can distinguish a human being from

0:32:20.400 --> 0:32:23.600
<v Speaker 2>a machine, the machine will be superior. And that is

0:32:23.640 --> 0:32:25.720
<v Speaker 2>not going to occur because the end of the day,

0:32:25.880 --> 0:32:30.440
<v Speaker 2>machines are machines that work on data, and data sets

0:32:30.480 --> 0:32:34.160
<v Speaker 2>are backward looking, and backward looking data is only going

0:32:34.200 --> 0:32:36.479
<v Speaker 2>to get you so far. Now, there's no doubt that

0:32:36.520 --> 0:32:40.040
<v Speaker 2>backward looking data that is used in a robust way

0:32:40.480 --> 0:32:43.400
<v Speaker 2>can answer a lot of questions. So when you see

0:32:43.400 --> 0:32:46.080
<v Speaker 2>people sort as they have in the last few year, saying, oh,

0:32:46.080 --> 0:32:50.520
<v Speaker 2>it's incredible, like AI programs can ace the l SAT,

0:32:50.560 --> 0:32:54.280
<v Speaker 2>it's like, well, I'm sorry, machines have been beating human

0:32:54.320 --> 0:32:57.000
<v Speaker 2>beings at chess for fifteen years, Like why are you surprised?

0:32:57.360 --> 0:33:00.000
<v Speaker 2>The l SATs are completely based on data. Of course,

0:33:00.320 --> 0:33:05.400
<v Speaker 2>machines that are data driven and good computational engines are

0:33:05.480 --> 0:33:07.920
<v Speaker 2>going to beat the human mind in anything that's based

0:33:08.000 --> 0:33:10.880
<v Speaker 2>on data. But there are a bunch of things that

0:33:11.000 --> 0:33:16.000
<v Speaker 2>machines are highly unlikely ever to do, because data driving

0:33:16.040 --> 0:33:21.640
<v Speaker 2>a predictive model isn't going to answer human questions. Creativity

0:33:22.160 --> 0:33:24.440
<v Speaker 2>applied to the entertainment business, which is a little world

0:33:24.520 --> 0:33:30.160
<v Speaker 2>in which I live, relies upon the unexpected for its

0:33:30.200 --> 0:33:33.680
<v Speaker 2>biggest hits. The biggest hits are, by their nature unexpected.

0:33:34.320 --> 0:33:39.640
<v Speaker 2>So sure, storytelling is informed by Shakespeare data. But great,

0:33:39.800 --> 0:33:44.960
<v Speaker 2>great stories well told reflect human genius that data sets

0:33:45.000 --> 0:33:50.680
<v Speaker 2>simply can't replicate. So in my world of interactive entertainment development,

0:33:51.160 --> 0:33:55.280
<v Speaker 2>will coding be much more efficient because of general of AI?

0:33:55.760 --> 0:34:02.240
<v Speaker 2>Unquestionably it's already happening. But will coving replace human genius?

0:34:03.000 --> 0:34:07.960
<v Speaker 2>Or more pointedly, will someone with you know, chat GPT

0:34:08.560 --> 0:34:11.399
<v Speaker 2>seventy three be able to push a button and make

0:34:11.440 --> 0:34:15.120
<v Speaker 2>a competitor to GTA six. No, And I can say

0:34:15.120 --> 0:34:20.439
<v Speaker 2>that unequivocally equally. Are all things AI going to reduce employment? Well,

0:34:20.560 --> 0:34:23.600
<v Speaker 2>I don't know the history of technology, which is one

0:34:23.640 --> 0:34:27.160
<v Speaker 2>thousand years old, and of the technology we understand to

0:34:27.239 --> 0:34:31.000
<v Speaker 2>be technology one hundred years old has been that technology

0:34:31.040 --> 0:34:37.080
<v Speaker 2>creates productivity. Productivity drives GDP. GDP growth drives employment. And

0:34:37.400 --> 0:34:39.239
<v Speaker 2>take a look at how many people were employed to

0:34:39.320 --> 0:34:41.879
<v Speaker 2>take to interactive eighteen years ago when I took over

0:34:42.320 --> 0:34:45.400
<v Speaker 2>about one thousand people. Today we employ thirteen and a

0:34:45.440 --> 0:34:47.640
<v Speaker 2>half thousand people. Take a look at the tech we

0:34:47.760 --> 0:34:50.560
<v Speaker 2>used then and the tech we use now. There's no comparison,

0:34:51.360 --> 0:34:56.360
<v Speaker 2>Absolutely no comparison. So I'm an optimist about what AI

0:34:56.520 --> 0:34:59.920
<v Speaker 2>can do, and I'm not at all worried about machine

0:35:00.520 --> 0:35:05.200
<v Speaker 2>taking over, becoming evil or condemning us to a life

0:35:05.239 --> 0:35:06.320
<v Speaker 2>of naval gazing.

0:35:07.040 --> 0:35:09.359
<v Speaker 3>It's interesting. We just came out with a study which

0:35:09.400 --> 0:35:11.319
<v Speaker 3>we do every year, we do a massive study of

0:35:11.400 --> 0:35:14.240
<v Speaker 3>the consumer. This year we did it on the human consumer,

0:35:14.280 --> 0:35:18.600
<v Speaker 3>really about how the consumer's thinking about humanity, being human

0:35:18.800 --> 0:35:22.280
<v Speaker 3>and technology. And it's interesting. Seventy percent of the people

0:35:22.400 --> 0:35:25.520
<v Speaker 3>use AI, but ninety percent what they're media created by

0:35:25.520 --> 0:35:28.360
<v Speaker 3>real humans. And it was very clear that the consumer

0:35:28.480 --> 0:35:31.200
<v Speaker 3>is saying, I like it as a tool, I don't

0:35:31.239 --> 0:35:34.600
<v Speaker 3>ever want it masquerading as something it's not. As a

0:35:34.640 --> 0:35:37.479
<v Speaker 3>matter of fact. It's interesting. So from about seventy six

0:35:37.560 --> 0:35:41.400
<v Speaker 3>percent to ninety three percent. The idea that the most

0:35:41.400 --> 0:35:44.719
<v Speaker 3>important thing in my life are human connections. That more

0:35:44.760 --> 0:35:48.280
<v Speaker 3>important than ever. That growth came from twenty sixteen till today.

0:35:48.360 --> 0:35:51.319
<v Speaker 3>So interesting world we're living in. If you could go

0:35:51.440 --> 0:35:54.279
<v Speaker 3>back in time, what advice would you have for your

0:35:54.280 --> 0:35:55.400
<v Speaker 3>twenty one year old self.

0:35:55.800 --> 0:35:57.799
<v Speaker 2>Don't worry so much, It'll be okay in the end.

0:35:58.120 --> 0:36:01.680
<v Speaker 3>Good piece of advice. So we end each episode of

0:36:01.719 --> 0:36:04.840
<v Speaker 3>Matth and Magic with a shout out to the analytical

0:36:04.920 --> 0:36:07.640
<v Speaker 3>side of business. They just see business as numbers and

0:36:07.719 --> 0:36:11.000
<v Speaker 3>it comes together. And then you have the other side

0:36:11.000 --> 0:36:13.600
<v Speaker 3>that are people who just have these incredible creative ideas.

0:36:13.680 --> 0:36:16.000
<v Speaker 3>By the way, not everybody has the combo you do

0:36:16.120 --> 0:36:19.360
<v Speaker 3>of both. Who would you give the shout out to

0:36:19.600 --> 0:36:22.720
<v Speaker 3>on both the sort of analytical side, the number side,

0:36:22.760 --> 0:36:25.600
<v Speaker 3>and on the creative side.

0:36:24.760 --> 0:36:27.320
<v Speaker 2>From the point of view of the entertainment business. Dick Parsons,

0:36:27.480 --> 0:36:30.160
<v Speaker 2>who we both knew well. I think he had an

0:36:30.239 --> 0:36:35.000
<v Speaker 2>extraordinary touch for business and people and data. But there's

0:36:35.040 --> 0:36:39.359
<v Speaker 2>so many other candidates. Really Jeff Ducas or really kind

0:36:39.400 --> 0:36:42.239
<v Speaker 2>of the master in this Steve Ross, and in many

0:36:42.239 --> 0:36:44.960
<v Speaker 2>ways I tried to model my career after his without

0:36:44.960 --> 0:36:48.480
<v Speaker 2>some of the more colorful elements on the creative side.

0:36:48.760 --> 0:36:53.120
<v Speaker 2>Jeffrey Katzenberg. He really has embodied sort of that intersection

0:36:53.239 --> 0:36:56.880
<v Speaker 2>of understanding the media in which he operates and understanding

0:36:56.920 --> 0:37:00.839
<v Speaker 2>storytelling and engaging with creative people bringing out the best

0:37:00.880 --> 0:37:02.640
<v Speaker 2>of them, and being creative himself.

0:37:02.800 --> 0:37:06.360
<v Speaker 3>Of course, Strauss, you've been an amazing friend for I

0:37:06.360 --> 0:37:09.240
<v Speaker 3>guess is more than thirty years. Your story is really

0:37:09.360 --> 0:37:12.440
<v Speaker 3>like no other, and your success is really a testament

0:37:12.800 --> 0:37:15.280
<v Speaker 3>to the leader you are. Thanks for sharing your lessons

0:37:15.280 --> 0:37:15.880
<v Speaker 3>with us today.

0:37:16.320 --> 0:37:17.160
<v Speaker 2>Thanks for having me.

0:37:20.719 --> 0:37:22.160
<v Speaker 3>Here are a few things I picked up from my

0:37:22.239 --> 0:37:26.960
<v Speaker 3>conversation with Strauss. One, Creative risk and financial risk are

0:37:27.000 --> 0:37:29.719
<v Speaker 3>two different things, and they don't have to mirror each other.

0:37:30.080 --> 0:37:34.399
<v Speaker 3>Strauss embraces creative risk, but demands financial security. In fact,

0:37:34.440 --> 0:37:36.840
<v Speaker 3>he believes a strong balance sheet is what allows bold

0:37:36.960 --> 0:37:40.920
<v Speaker 3>creative choices. Only when creatives have the space to make mistakes,

0:37:41.239 --> 0:37:42.480
<v Speaker 3>whill you see real innovation.

0:37:43.160 --> 0:37:43.399
<v Speaker 2>Two.

0:37:43.920 --> 0:37:47.160
<v Speaker 3>Recognize talent when you see it. Strauss has thrived in

0:37:47.200 --> 0:37:50.880
<v Speaker 3>the entertainment business, but he's never the one directing, writing,

0:37:51.000 --> 0:37:54.200
<v Speaker 3>or even giving notes. What he does exceptionally well is

0:37:54.280 --> 0:37:58.120
<v Speaker 3>distinguish the people who are most talented, continue to develop

0:37:58.160 --> 0:38:01.600
<v Speaker 3>their skills, and encourage their work. His retention rate says

0:38:01.600 --> 0:38:05.759
<v Speaker 3>it all. Three. Proving yourself can be a personal challenge.

0:38:06.000 --> 0:38:10.400
<v Speaker 3>Sometimes people strive for greatness for status or recognition. Strauss

0:38:10.440 --> 0:38:13.320
<v Speaker 3>was successful from her young age and countless people admired

0:38:13.320 --> 0:38:16.160
<v Speaker 3>his work, but he needed to prove his abilities to

0:38:16.239 --> 0:38:20.240
<v Speaker 3>himself before jumping into an entrepreneurial journey later in life.

0:38:20.600 --> 0:38:24.440
<v Speaker 3>I see it in his commitment to help and wellness too. Ultimately,

0:38:24.560 --> 0:38:28.600
<v Speaker 3>it comes from the place of respecting himself. Four Yet

0:38:28.920 --> 0:38:31.879
<v Speaker 3>more sleep. Lastly, I think we would all do well

0:38:31.920 --> 0:38:34.840
<v Speaker 3>to live by Strauss's example and work to prioritize in

0:38:34.880 --> 0:38:38.040
<v Speaker 3>that department. I'm Bob Pittman. Thanks for listening.

0:38:39.960 --> 0:38:42.840
<v Speaker 1>That's it for today's episode. Thanks so much for listening

0:38:42.840 --> 0:38:45.800
<v Speaker 1>to Math and Magic, a production of iHeart Podcasts. The

0:38:45.880 --> 0:38:48.479
<v Speaker 1>show is created and hosted by Bob Pittman. The Math

0:38:48.520 --> 0:38:52.120
<v Speaker 1>and Magic team is Ali Perry, Jessica Crinchitch, and Dylan Hoyer.

0:38:52.480 --> 0:38:55.759
<v Speaker 1>Special thanks to Sidney Rosenbloom for booking and wrangling our

0:38:55.800 --> 0:38:59.000
<v Speaker 1>wonderful talent, which is no small feat. Until next time,